104 MARC puzzles (model: gpt-oss-120b) | 1560 alternative clues | Valid alts: 744/1560
See: The input grid contains one or more outlined parallelogram-like shapes made of a single non-black color each, set against a black background. Each shape is an open outline (not filled) forming a slanted quadrilateral: the top and bottom edges are horizontal line segments, while the left and right edges slant diagonally downward to the right. The right edge and left edge have the same diagonal slope. The bottom-right corner of each shape is where the right edge meets the bottom edge.
Do: For each colored shape independently: (1) Identify the bottommost row of the shape and the rightmost column occupied by any pixel of the shape. (2) Every pixel that is NOT on the bottommost row of the shape AND NOT on the rightmost column of the shape gets shifted one cell to the right. (3) Pixels on the bottommost row or on the rightmost column remain in place. This has the effect of straightening the right edge of the parallelogram — the diagonal right side becomes more vertical at the bottom while the overall shape narrows its slant by one column.
Grid: The grid dimensions remain unchanged from input to output. The background is black (.). Shapes do not touch the grid edges and do not overlap each other. Each shape occupies a contiguous rectangular bounding region. Colors 0-9 are possible but only non-black colors form the shapes.
"A sail catching the wind snaps taut against its mast"
120b: k=1
See: Against a dark sea, colored sails billow in the wind — each one a slanted, hollow shape whose fabric stretches diagonally from its mast line on the right. The sails are slack, their left edges pulling away at an angle, making them lean like parallelograms rather than standing upright.
Do: A gust of wind blows from the left, pressing each sail flat against its mast. The mast (the rightmost edge) and the boom (the bottom edge) are rigid — they hold firm. But every loose piece of canvas not anchored to the mast or boom gets pushed one step rightward toward the mast, tightening the billow. The sail becomes tauter, its silhouette a little more upright, as the slack fabric snugs closer to the rigid frame.
Grid: The dark ocean fills the grid unchanged. Each sail is a single color's hollow outline floating in its own patch of sea. Sails never touch the edges of the world or overlap one another. The mast and boom hold fast while the free canvas shifts windward.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape: a hollow outline of a color (A in example) shaped like a slanted parallelogram? Let's visualize example 1 input grid 8x9? Actually given 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . ." =9 columns. rows 8. The shape: azure A forms a diagonal line from left to right? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Row1 index0? Row0 all dots. Row1: ". A A A A A . . ." columns 1-5 A. Row2: ". A . . . . A . ." columns1 and6 A. Row3: ". . A . . . . A ." columns2 and7 A. Row4: ". . . A . . . . A" columns3 and8 A. Row5: ". . . . A A A A A" columns4-8 A. So shape is like a hollow right-leaning parallelogram with right edge vertical? Actually mast is rightmost edge (vertical line) and bottom edge (boom) horizontal? In input, the rightmost column of shape is at column8 row4 and row5? Row5 has A at col8 (rightmost). Row4 also at col8. So right edge vertical from row4 to row5? Actually row4 col8 A, row5 col8 A. That's vertical line of length2. Bottom edge is row5 columns4-8 A (horizontal). So shape is a hollow outline of a parallelogram leaning leftwards? The left edge is diagonal from (row1,col1) down-right to (row4,col3). That's a diagonal line. Now output: shape shifted? Output rows: Row1: ". . A A A A A . ." columns2-6 A (shifted right by 1?). Input row1 had A at cols1-5. Output row1 has at 2-6. So moved right one. Row2 unchanged? Input row2 had A at col1 and6. Output row2 same? Output row2: ". . A . . . . A ." columns2 and7? Wait output row2: ". . A . . . . A ." that's col2 and7. Input row2 had col1 and6. So shifted right by1. Row3 input col2 and7; output col3 and8? Output row3: ". . . A . . . . A" columns3 and8. Yes shift right 1. Row4 input col3 and8; output col4 and8? Output row4: ". . . . A . . . A" columns4 and8. Left edge moved right, but right edge stayed at col8 (mast). Row5 input bottom row col4-8; output same col4-8 (unchanged). So rule: shift all non-mast, non-bottom edge cells one step right, but keep mast (rightmost vertical edge) and bottom edge fixed. Essentially "press sails flat": move all canvas cells that are not on the rightmost column of shape (mast) nor on the bottom row of shape (boom) one step right. Thus for test input with Y shape similar but larger? Let's map. Test input grid 10 rows, 9 columns? Actually first line ". . . . . . . . . ." 9 columns. rows 10. Let's locate Y shape. Row0 all dots. Row1: ". Y Y Y Y Y Y . . ." columns1-6 Y. Row2: ". Y . . . . . Y . ." columns1 and7 Y. Row3: ". . Y . . . . . Y ." columns2 and8 Y. Row4: ". . . Y . . . . . Y" columns3 and9? Wait only 9 columns, index0-8. Row4 string: ". . . Y . . . . . Y" that's 10 entries? Let's count: tokens: '.' '.' '.' 'Y' '.' '.' '.' '.' '.' 'Y' =10 columns. But earlier rows have 9 columns. Something off. Let's recount each row tokens. Given test input lines: ". . . . . . . . . ." ". Y Y Y Y Y Y . . ." ". Y . . . . . Y . ." ". . Y . . . . . Y ." ". . . Y . . . . . Y" ". . . . Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". . . . . . . . . ." ". . ... [5187 chars truncated]
"A leaning cell membrane stiffens as cytoskeletal filaments anchor its trailing edge"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of tilted cellular membranes float in dark cytoplasm. Each membrane forms a slanted envelope whose right wall leans away from vertical, connected to a firm base.
Do: The cytoskeleton pulls the loose interior of each membrane rightward toward the anchored edge and floor, while the base and the rightmost column of attachment points remain fixed. The cell wall becomes more upright.
Grid: Grid dimensions unchanged. Black background is cytoplasm. Colored pixels are membrane walls. Shapes do not overlap or touch grid edges.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape: colored outline of tilted membrane: looks like a right-leaning slanted rectangle? In example, shape is azure A. Input shape: a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Let's visualize. Example input grid 8x9? Actually 8 rows, 9 columns? Provided lines: first line ". . . . . . . . ." (9 columns). So 8 rows, 9 columns. Shape: Row1 (index0) all dots. Row2: ". A A A A A . . ." => A from col1 to col5 (0-index). Row3: ". A . . . . A . ." => A at col1 and col6. Row4: ". . A . . . . A ." => A at col2 and col7. Row5: ". . . A . . . . A" => A at col3 and col8. Row6: ". . . . A A A A A" => A from col4 to col8. So shape is like a slanted rectangle leaning right: top horizontal line from col1-5 row1? Actually row2. Right side vertical line at col? The rightmost column of shape is at col8 row5? Actually row5 col8 A. Row6 col8 A as part of bottom line. So shape forms a parallelogram? The base is bottom horizontal line row6 col4-8. Rightmost column is col8 rows4-6? Row4 col7 A, row5 col8 A, row6 col8 A. So rightmost column is slanted? The description: "right wall leans away from vertical, connected to a firm base." So shape is like a slanted rectangle with right side leaning outward (i.e., slanted to the right). The transformation: "cytoskeleton pulls the loose interior of each membrane rightward toward the anchored edge and floor, while the base and the rightmost column of attachment points remain fixed. The cell wall becomes more upright." Interpretation: The shape interior (the area inside the outline) is being shifted rightwards until the shape becomes more upright (i.e., right wall becomes vertical). The base and rightmost column stay fixed. So we need to "fill" interior? Actually output shows shape changed: Let's compare input vs output. Input row2: ". A A A A A . . ." Output row2: ". . A A A A A . ." So the top horizontal line moved one column right? Actually originally A from col1-5 (5 As) plus maybe col? Wait row2 had A at col1-5 (5 As). Output row2 has A from col2-6 (5 As) plus also at col? Actually output row2: ". . A A A A A . ." that's col2-6 (5 As) plus col? count: positions: 0 '.';1 '.';2 A;3 A;4 A;5 A;6 A;7 '.';8 '.'. So top line shifted right by 1. Row3 input: ". A . . . . A . ." Output row3: ". . A . . . . A ." So left A moved right one, right A stays same? Actually right A originally at col6, output at col7? Wait output row3 col7 A? Let's index: row3 output: positions:0 '.';1 '.';2 A;3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 A;8 '.'. So left A moved from col1 to col2? Actually from col1 to col2? Wait col indices: col0 '.'; col1 '.'; col2 A (so moved from col1 to col2). Right A moved from col6 to col7 (shifted right by 1). So both moved right. Row4 input: ". . A . . . . A ." Output: ". . . A . . . . A" Left A moved from col2 to col3 (right 1). Right A stays at col8? Actually output row4 col8 A (same as input col7? Wait input col7 A). Input row4 right A at col7. Output row4 right A at col8 (right 1 ... [5866 chars truncated]
"A gravitationally lensed ring image de-shears as the observer's frame corrects for the mass"
120b: k=2
See: Colored outlines of distorted ring images appear against dark space. Each ring is a slanted quadrilateral — gravitational lensing has skewed the right side into a diagonal.
Do: All photons not on the lowest arc or the rightmost ray shift one pixel toward the gravitational center. The base arc and rightmost ray are unaffected. The distortion lessens.
Grid: Black is deep space. Colored outlines are lensed images. Grid size preserved. Images don't overlap.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colored outlines of distorted ring images: slanted quadrilateral, right side diagonal. The rule: "All photons not on the lowest arc or the rightmost ray shift one pixel toward the gravitational center. The base arc and rightmost ray are unaffected. The distortion lessens." Interpretation: There is a shape like a ring (maybe a quadrilateral) with a base arc (lowest) and rightmost ray (vertical/horizontal?). The shape appears as colored cells forming an outline of a slanted quadrilateral (like a right-leaning shape). The transformation moves all colored cells except those on the bottom row of the shape (lowest arc) and the rightmost column of the shape (rightmost ray) one pixel towards the center (i.e., down-left? towards gravitational center). The base arc and rightmost ray stay. Let's examine Example 1. Input grid 8x9? Actually 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: Input lines show 9 columns. Row0 all '.'. Row1: . A A A A A . . . (positions 1-5 A) Row2: . A . . . . A . . (positions 1 and 6) Row3: . . A . . . . A . (positions 2 and 7) Row4: . . . A . . . . A (positions 3 and 8) Row5: . . . . A A A A A (positions 4-8) Rows6-7 empty. So shape is like a slanted quadrilateral: top horizontal line of A from col1-5 row1, then diagonal down-right? Actually there is a rightmost ray: column 8? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Use 0-index. Row1 col1-5 A (top edge) Row2 col1 and col6 A (left side and right side) Row3 col2 and col7 A Row4 col3 and col8 A Row5 col4-8 A (bottom edge) So shape is a quadrilateral with top edge horizontal, left edge vertical? Actually left side is diagonal? Let's see: left side goes from (1,1) down to (2,1) same column, then (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). That's diagonal down-right. Right side goes from (1,5) to (2,6) to (3,7) to (4,8) to (5,8) (bottom right). So rightmost ray is column 8? Actually bottom edge includes col8 as part of bottom line. Now output: Let's see changes. Output rows: Row1: . . A A A A A . . (positions 2-6 A) So top edge shifted right by 1? Actually originally top edge at cols1-5, now at 2-6. So each A moved one column right? But rule says shift toward center (gravitational center). Center of shape maybe somewhere interior. For top edge, moving right would be towards interior (since shape slants right). Indeed interior is to the right of top edge. Row2: . . A . . . . A . (positions 2 and 7) originally at 1 and 6. Both shifted right by 1. Row3: . . . A . . . . A (positions 3 and 8) originally at 2 and 7. Shift right by 1. Row4: . . . . A . . . A (positions 4 and 8) originally at 3 and 8? Wait original row4 had A at col3 and col8. Output row4 has A at col4 and col8. So left side shifted right by 1, rightmost unchanged (col8). That's consistent: rightmost ray (rightmost column of shape) stays unchanged. Row5: . . . . A A A A A (positions 4-8) same as input row5 (col4-8). So bottom edge unchanged (lowest arc). Indeed rule: base arc unchanged. Thus rule: For ... [7128 chars truncated]
"A skewed waveform on the oscilloscope corrects as the phase lock engages on the trigger edge"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of signal waveforms appear on a dark display. Each waveform forms a slanted shape — the right edge drifts diagonally instead of falling vertically to the baseline.
Do: Every sample not on the baseline or the trigger edge shifts one tick rightward toward the locked reference. The baseline and trigger column remain fixed. The waveform snaps to alignment.
Grid: Black display background. Colored outlines are signal traces. Grid unchanged. Waveforms are separate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 8x9? Actually example input shows 8 rows, 9 columns. Output same size. Let's map coordinates. Use '.' black background. In example, there is shape of azure A forming a slanted waveform. Input shape: Row1 (index0) all .; Row2: . A A A A A . . . (positions 1-5? Actually columns 0-8). Row2 has A from col1 to col5 inclusive (5 As). Row3: . A . . . . A . . (A at col1 and col6). Row4: . . A . . . . A . (A at col2 and col7). Row5: . . . A . . . . A (A at col3 and col8). Row6: . . . . A A A A A (A from col4 to col8). Row7-8 all . . So shape looks like a diagonal right edge moving downwards? Let's visualize coordinates (row, col). Baseline maybe bottom row of shape? The "baseline" maybe the leftmost vertical? Actually description: "right edge drifts diagonally instead of falling vertically to the baseline." So baseline is leftmost column? Or maybe the leftmost vertical line is fixed, and right edge shifts rightwards to align vertically. Transformation: "Every sample not on the baseline or the trigger edge shifts one tick rightward toward the locked reference. The baseline and trigger column remain fixed. The waveform snaps to alignment." Interpretation: There is a shape with a baseline (maybe leftmost column of shape) and a trigger edge (maybe rightmost column?). The shape is slanted; we need to shift interior points rightwards until shape becomes vertical? In output, compare. Output rows: Row2: . . A A A A A . . (now As from col2 to col6). Row3 unchanged: . . A . . . . A . (A at col2 and col7). Row4: . . . A . . . . A (A at col3 and col8). Row5: . . . . A . . . A (A at col4 and col8). Row6: . . . . A A A A A (same as input row6). So what changed? In input, row2 had As from col1-5; output shifted them right by 1 (now col2-6). Row3 had A at col1 and col6; output now at col2 and col7 (both shifted right by 1). Row4: col2 and col7 -> col3 and col8 (shift right 1). Row5: col3 and col8 -> col4 and col8? Wait col8 stays same? Input row5 had A at col3 and col8. Output row5 has A at col4 and col8. So left A shifted right 1, rightmost A stayed same (col8). Row6: As at col4-8 unchanged. Thus rule: For each row, shift all As right by 1 except those that are at the rightmost column of the shape (the "trigger edge") which stays fixed. Also baseline maybe leftmost column? Actually leftmost column of shape maybe baseline? But they shift right as well, except maybe the leftmost column of shape? In row2, leftmost A at col1 moved to col2, so baseline not fixed. So baseline maybe bottom row? Hmm. Observation: The shape seems to be a diagonal line of As forming right edge moving downwards. The rightmost column of shape is column index that increases each row (col5 row2, col6 row3, col7 row4, col8 row5, col8 row6? Actually row6 rightmost col8). In output, those rightmost As stay same (col5 row2? Wait row2 rightmost col5 moved to col6? Actually row2 rightmost col5 moved to col6, so not fixed). Let's examine: In input ... [4174 chars truncated]
"A crooked rune inscribed on shadow-stone is straightened by the right hand of the glyph-keeper"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of runic glyphs are carved into dark stone. Each glyph is a slanted quadrilateral frame — its right stroke leans diagonally away from the base stroke.
Do: Every mark not on the base stroke or the rightmost column of the glyph is pushed one chisel-width toward the keeper's hand. The base and right column hold fast. The rune becomes more upright.
Grid: Black stone is background. Colored outlines are rune strokes. Grid unchanged. Glyphs are separate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid shows a shape: azure A forming a slanted quadrilateral frame. Output shows it shifted? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-7, cols 0-8. Input rows: 0: all . 1: . A A A A A . . . 2: . A . . . . A . . 3: . . A . . . . A . 4: . . . A . . . . A 5: . . . . A A A A A 6: . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . Output rows: 0: all . 1: . . A A A A A . . 2: . . A . . . . A . 3: . . . A . . . . A 4: . . . . A . . . A 5: . . . . A A A A A 6: . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . So transformation: The shape moved right? Compare input vs output: In input, row1 has A from col1-5 (5 cells) plus col? Actually row1: cols1-5 are A, col6? Let's count: row1: . A A A A A . . . => A at cols1-5 inclusive (5 cells). Output row1: . . A A A A A . . => A at cols2-6 (shifted right by 1). Row2 input: A at col1 and col6. Output row2: A at col2 and col7? Actually output row2: . . A . . . . A . => A at col2 and col7. Yes shifted right by 1. Row3 input: A at col2 and col7. Output row3: . . . A . . . . A => A at col3 and col8 (shift right 1). Row4 input: A at col3 and col8. Output row4: . . . . A . . . A => A at col4 and col9? Wait grid width 9 columns (0-8). col9 out of range. Actually output row4 shows A at col4 and col8? Let's check: row4 output: ". . . . A . . . A" that's A at col4 and col8 (since indices: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 A). Input row4 had A at col3 and col8. So left A moved from col3 to col4 (right 1). Rightmost A stayed at col8 (did not move). Row5 input: A at cols4-8 (5 cells). Output row5: same A at cols4-8 (unchanged). So rule: "Every mark not on the base stroke or the rightmost column of the glyph is pushed one chisel-width toward the keeper's hand. The base and right column hold fast." So base stroke likely the bottom row of the quadrilateral? In shape, base stroke is the bottom horizontal line (row5). Rightmost column is the rightmost vertical side (col8). Those stay unchanged. All other A's shift right by 1. Thus transformation: For each colored shape (glyph), identify its "base stroke" (the bottommost row of the shape) and its "rightmost column" (the rightmost column of the shape). Keep those cells unchanged. All other cells of that color shift right by 1 (i.e., column+1) if empty? In example, shifting didn't cause overlap because rightmost column cells already occupied. Now apply to test input with Y color. Input grid 10x10? Let's count rows: given 10 rows, each with 10 columns. Rows index 0-9, cols 0-9. Input rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . Y Y Y Y Y Y . . . 2: . Y . . . . . Y . . 3: . . Y . . . . . Y . 4: . . . Y . . . . . Y 5: . . . . Y Y Y Y Y Y 6: . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . We need to identify glyph: Y forms slanted quadrilateral frame similar to A shape. Let's map Y positions. Row1 (r1): Y at cols1-6 (since . Y Y Y Y Y Y . . .) that's cols1-6 inclusive (6 cells). Row2: Y at col1 and col7. Row3: Y at ... [3110 chars truncated]
"Dancers in a tilted chevron close formation by stepping toward the anchor on the right wing"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of dancer formations appear on a dark stage. Each formation is a slanted open shape — the right side angles diagonally instead of holding a vertical column.
Do: Every dancer not on the front line or the right wing steps one position rightward. The front line and right-wing anchor hold still. The chevron tightens toward a rectangle.
Grid: Black is the stage floor. Colored outlines are dancer positions. Grid size preserved. Formations are independent.
We need to infer rule. Input shows shape: colored outline of dancer formation appears as slanted open shape — right side angles diagonally instead of vertical column. The rule: "Every dancer not on the front line or the right wing steps one position rightward. The front line and right-wing anchor hold still. The chevron tightens toward a rectangle." Interpretation: The shape is like a right-angled triangle? Let's examine example. Input grid 8x9? Actually example 1 input lines: 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . ." =9 columns. rows 8. Output also 8x9. In input, there is shape of A (azure) forming a slanted open shape: Let's map coordinates (row, col) starting 0. Row1 (index0) all . . Row2 (1): . A A A A A . . . (col1-5 A) Row3 (2): . A . . . . A . . (col1 and col6) Row4 (3): . . A . . . . A . (col2 and col7) Row5 (4): . . . A . . . . A (col3 and col8) Row6 (5): . . . . A A A A A (col4-8 A) Rows7-8 empty. So shape looks like a right-leaning open shape: top horizontal line of A from col1-5 row1? Actually row1 is empty. Row2 has a horizontal line of length5 starting at col1. Then diagonal down-right from (row2,col5?) Actually row2 col5 is A, row3 col6 A, row4 col7 A, row5 col8 A. That's diagonal line. Then bottom horizontal line from col4 to col8 row5? Wait row5 has A at col3? Actually row5 col3 A (since . . . A). That's leftmost of bottom line? Let's see row5: . . . A . . . . A (col3 and col8). So bottom line is from col3 to col8? But there is gap between col3 and col8 (only A at col3 and col8). However row6 has A from col4-8 (continuous). So shape is like a chevron? Let's view shape: top horizontal line (row2 col1-5). Right side diagonal down to bottom right (col5->col8). Bottom horizontal line (row6 col4-8). Also left side vertical? Not exactly. Now output: Let's see changes. Output rows: Row2: . . A A A A A . . (A shifted right? originally row2 had . A A A A A . . . now . . A A A A A . . So the leftmost A moved right one column, but the rightmost A (col5) maybe stays? Actually original row2 had A at cols1-5. Output has A at cols2-6? Wait output row2: . . A A A A A . . => A at cols2-6 (5 As). So they all shifted right by 1, except maybe the rightmost anchor? But there is no anchor on right wing? The right wing is the diagonal side? Let's see. Row3 output: . . A . . . . A . (same as input row3). Input row3 had . A . . . . A . . (A at col1 and col6). Output row3 has A at col2 and col7? Actually . . A . . . . A . => A at col2 and col7. So both shifted right by 1. Row4 output: . . . A . . . . A (A at col3 and col8). Input row4 had . . A . . . . A . (col2 and col7). So shifted right by 1. Row5 output: . . . . A . . . A (A at col4 and col8). Input row5 had . . . A . . . . A (col3 and col8). Here left A shifted right, rightmost A stays same (col8). So rightmost anchor stays. Row6 output: . . . . A A A A A (A at col4-8). Input row6 had . . . . A A A A A (same). So bottom line unchanged. Thus rule: shift ... [10035 chars truncated]
"A shear-folded rock layer is compressed until its right limb stands vertical again"
120b: k=2
See: Colored outlines of folded strata appear in dark bedrock. Each stratum is a slanted quadrilateral outline — the right limb of the fold tilts diagonally from the horizontal base.
Do: Every mineral grain not on the basal contact or the rightmost limb is displaced one unit toward the limb by tectonic pressure. The base and right limb are pinned. The fold tightens.
Grid: Black is surrounding rock. Colored outlines are strata boundaries. Grid unchanged. Layers don't overlap.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have a grid with black background '.' and colored outlines forming a slanted quadrilateral (fold). The description: "Every mineral grain not on the basal contact or the rightmost limb is displaced one unit toward the limb by tectonic pressure. The base and right limb are pinned." Interpretation: The shape is like a right-leaning triangle? Let's examine Example 1. Input grid (9x8? Actually 8 rows? Let's count). Example 1 Input lines: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . A A A A A . . . Row2: . A . . . . A . . Row3: . . A . . . . A . Row4: . . . A . . . . A Row5: . . . . A A A A A Row6: . . . . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . . . . . So shape of A's forms a slanted quadrilateral: base is bottom row of A's? Actually row5 has A A A A A from col4 to col8? Let's index columns 0-8? Actually there are 9 columns. Row5: positions: col4 '.'? Wait row5: ". . . . A A A A A". So col4 is A? Let's list columns 0-8: col0 '.',1'.',2'.',3'.',4'A',5'A',6'A',7'A',8'A'. So base is horizontal line at row5 from col4 to col8. The rightmost limb is diagonal from top right to bottom right? Let's see: top row of shape row1 has A's from col2 to col6? Row1: ". A A A A A . . ." => col1? Actually row1: col0 '.', col1 'A', col2 'A', col3 'A', col4 'A', col5 'A', col6 '.', col7 '.', col8 '.'. So topmost row of shape is row1 col1-col5. Rightmost limb appears as diagonal from row1 col5? Actually row1 col5 is A, then row2 col6 is A, row3 col7 is A, row4 col8 is A, row5 col8 is A (base). So rightmost limb is diagonal line of A's at positions (row1,col5), (row2,col6), (row3,col7), (row4,col8), (row5,col8). That's a slanted line. Base is row5 col4-col8. Now rule: "Every mineral grain not on the basal contact or the rightmost limb is displaced one unit toward the limb". So all A's that are not on base row5 or on rightmost diagonal should shift one unit towards the rightmost limb (i.e., down-right? Actually "toward the limb" meaning towards the rightmost limb direction, which is diagonal down-right direction. So shift each interior cell one step down-right (south-east) maybe. Let's test: In input, interior A's include those not on base row5 and not on rightmost diagonal. For example row2 col1 is A (since row2: ". A . . . . A . .") Actually row2 col1 is A, not on base, not on rightmost limb (rightmost limb at row2 col6). So it should move one step toward limb: which direction? The limb is down-right direction, so moving one step down-right would go to row3 col2. In output, row3 col2 is A? Let's see output row3: ". . . A . . . . A". Row3 col2 is '.' (col0 '.',1'.',2'.',3'A'). So not there. Wait maybe shift is up-right? Let's examine output. Output grid Example1: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . A A A A A . . Row2: . . A . . . . A . Row3: . . . A . . . . A Row4: . . . . A . . . A Row5: . . . . A A A A A Row6: . . . . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . . . . . Compare input vs output. Input row1 had A's at col1-5. Output row1 has ... [10804 chars truncated]
"A parallelogram pennant streaming in the wind is hauled taut against its halyard"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of pennant shapes fly against a dark sky. Each pennant is a slanted quadrilateral — its free edge trails diagonally away from the halyard line on the right and the bottom spar.
Do: Every thread of fabric not sewn to the bottom spar or the halyard is pulled one stitch toward the line. The spar and halyard hold firm. The pennant flattens against the mast.
Grid: Black is sky. Colored outlines are pennant edges. Grid dimensions unchanged. Pennants are separate and don't touch grid edges.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape of colored outline of pennant: In example, color A (azure) forms a diagonal shape? Let's visualize. Example input grid 8x9? Actually lines: 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: first row ". . . . . . . . ." =9 columns. rows 8. Pattern: Row1 all dots. Row2: ". A A A A A . . ." (positions 2-6 A). Row3: ". A . . . . A . ." (positions 2 and 7 A). Row4: ". . A . . . . A ." (positions3 and8). Row5: ". . . A . . . . A" (4 and9). Row6: ". . . . A A A A A" (5-9 A). Row7-8 all dots. So shape looks like a right triangle/pennant with right angle at bottom left? Actually outline: top horizontal line from col2-6 row2. Right edge diagonal down-right from (row2,col7?) Wait row2 col7 is '.'; but row3 col7 A, row4 col8 A, row5 col9 A. So diagonal from (row3,col7) to (row5,col9). Bottom edge horizontal from (row6,col5-9). Left edge vertical? There's A at (row2,col2) down to (row3,col2) then (row4,col3)?? Actually left edge is vertical? Let's see: column2 has A at rows2-3, then row4 col3 A (shifted right). So shape is a slanted quadrilateral: top edge horizontal, right edge diagonal down-right, bottom edge horizontal, left edge diagonal down-left? Wait left edge seems diagonal down-right as well? Let's map coordinates. Coordinates (r,c) 1-index. A cells: (2,2-6) (3,2) (3,7) (4,3) (4,8) (5,4) (5,9) (6,5-9) So shape is like a parallelogram/pennant with top edge from (2,2) to (2,6). Right edge from (2,6) down-right to (6,9) via (3,7),(4,8),(5,9). Bottom edge from (6,5) to (6,9). Left edge from (2,2) down-right to (6,5) via (3,2?) Actually (3,2) is directly below (2,2) not diagonal. Then (4,3) diagonal, (5,4) diagonal, (6,5) diagonal. So left edge is a stepwise line: vertical then diagonal. Now output: The shape appears "flattened" against the mast (halyard line). The description: "Every thread of fabric not sewn to the bottom spar or the halyard is pulled one stitch toward the line. The spar and halyard hold firm. The pennant flattens against the mast." Interpretation: The halyard line is the leftmost vertical line? Or maybe the top edge? The bottom spar is the bottom horizontal edge. The halyard is the left vertical edge? The shape is pulled towards the halyard line (left side) by one cell for all cells not on bottom or halyard (i.e., not on bottom edge or left edge). So they shift left by one? Let's see output. Output A cells: Row2: ". . A A A A A . ." (positions 3-7). So top edge shifted right? Wait original top edge at cols2-6, now at 3-7 (shifted right by 1). That's opposite direction (away from left). Hmm maybe halyard is right side? Let's examine. Right edge originally at (3,7),(4,8),(5,9). Output: Row3: ". . A . . . . A ." (positions3 and8). So right edge moved left by? originally at col7 now at col8? Actually original row3 had A at col7, output at col8 (shift right). Row4 original col8 -> output col9? Wait output row4: ". . . A . . . . A" positions4 and9. Original row4 had A at col3 and col8. So left edge move ... [7240 chars truncated]
"A crooked pastry shell is pressed flush against the right wall of its baking tin"
120b: k=2
See: Outlined dough shapes in various colors rest on a dark baking sheet. Each shape is a slanted open pastry outline — the right side leans like an improperly rolled crust.
Do: The baker nudges everything except the bottom crust and the rightmost edge one notch toward the tin wall. The bottom and right edges, already touching the tin, stay put. The lean corrects.
Grid: Black background is the baking sheet. Colored outlines are pastry shells. Grid size is preserved. Shapes are separate and non-touching.
We need to infer rule. From description: "baker nudges everything except the bottom crust and the rightmost edge one notch toward the tin wall. The bottom and right edges, already touching the tin, stay put. The lean corrects." Interpretation: shapes are outlined slanted open pastry shapes leaning right. The transformation nudges everything except bottom row and rightmost column one step towards bottom-right? Actually "toward the tin wall" maybe meaning downwards? Let's examine example. Example1 input grid 8x8? Actually given 8 rows? Let's count: Input lines: first line ". . . . . . . . ." (9? Actually there are 9 entries). Let's count: ". . . . . . . . ." that's 9 columns. Then rows etc. Output also 8 rows? Wait output also 8 rows? Actually both have 8 rows? Let's count rows: Input example1 shows 8 rows? lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . (row0) 2 . A A A A A . . . (row1) 3 . A . . . . A . . (row2) 4 . . A . . . . A . (row3) 5 . . . A . . . . A (row4) 6 . . . . A A A A A (row5) 7 . . . . . . . . . (row6) 8 . . . . . . . . . (row7) So 8 rows, 9 columns. Output rows: 1 . . . . . . . . . 2 . . A A A A A . . 3 . . A . . . . A . 4 . . . A . . . . A 5 . . . . A . . . A 6 . . . . A A A A A 7 . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . Observations: In input, shape of A forms a diagonal line from top-left to bottom-right? Let's map coordinates. Input shape: row1 col1-5 A (positions (1,1)-(1,5)). Row2: (2,1) A and (2,6) A. Row3: (3,2) A and (3,7) A. Row4: (4,3) A and (4,8) A. Row5: (5,4)-(5,8) A (five A). So shape is like a slanted open pastry: a diagonal line of A from top-left to bottom-right, with top horizontal line, bottom horizontal line, and right side vertical? Actually shape appears like a "Z" rotated? Let's visualize. Now output: row1 unchanged? Actually row1 (index0) all dots unchanged. Row2 (index1) now has A from col2 to col6 (shifted right by 1). Row3 unchanged? Row3 (index2) same as input row2? Wait output row3: ". . A . . . . A ." matches input row2? Input row2 had ". A . . . . A . ." (col1 and col6). Output row3 has A at col2 and col7? Actually ". . A . . . . A ." means A at col2? Let's index columns 0-8. Row3 output: col2 A, col7 A. Input row2 had col1 A, col6 A. So both shifted right by 1. Row4 output: ". . . A . . . . A" matches input row3 shifted right by 1 (col3 and col8). Row5 output: ". . . . A . . . A" matches input row4 shifted right by 1 (col4 and col9? but col9 out of range? Actually grid width 9, max index 8. Input row4 had A at col3 and col8. Shift right by 1 would be col4 and col9 (out of bounds). But output row5 shows A at col4 and col8? Wait output row5: ". . . . A . . . A" A at col4 and col8. So left A moved from col3 to col4 (right shift), rightmost A stayed at col8 (did not shift because at right edge). So rule: shift all colored cells one step to the right, except those already at rightmost column (stay). Also bottom row? Let's see bottom row of shape row5 (index5) input had A from col4-8 (five A). Output row6 (index5) same: " ... [6802 chars truncated]
"A jazz chord voiced too wide collapses inward as the left-hand voicings slide toward the root"
120b: k=2
See: Colored note-outlines form slanted shapes on a dark staff. Each shape's right edge drifts diagonally away from its bass note at the bottom-right corner.
Do: All notes except those in the bass register and the rightmost voice shift one position closer to the root tone. The bass line and the anchor voice hold steady. The voicing tightens.
Grid: Dark background is silence. Colored pixels are sounding notes. Grid dimensions stay the same. Shapes are independent and non-overlapping.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have grid with shapes: In example1, input has shape of A (azure) forming a slanted shape? Let's visualize. Example1 input grid 8x8? Actually given 8 rows? Let's count rows: Input lines: 1 ". . . . . . . . ." 2 ". A A A A A . . ." 3 ". A . . . . A . ." 4 ". . A . . . . A ." 5 ". . . A . . . . A" 6 ". . . . A A A A A" 7 ". . . . . . . . ." 8 ". . . . . . . . ." That's 8 rows, 9 columns? Actually each line has 9 entries. Output also 8 rows 9 columns. The shape appears like a diagonal line of A's forming a slanted shape from left side to right bottom? Let's map coordinates (row, col) starting 0. Rows 1-8 (0-7). Input A positions: Row1 (index1) row=1: cols 1-5 (since . A A A A A . . .) Actually columns 1-5 inclusive (0-index). Row2 (row=2): col1 and col6? ". A . . . . A . ." => col1 and col6. Row3: ". . A . . . . A ." => col2 and col7. Row4: ". . . A . . . . A" => col3 and col8. Row5: ". . . . A A A A A" => col4-8. So shape looks like a right-leaning triangle? Actually it's like a shape with left edge vertical? Let's see output: A's shifted left? Output rows: Row1 unchanged (all .) Row2: ". . A A A A A . ." => A's from col2-6 (shifted right? Actually originally row2 had A at cols1-5. Now they are at cols2-6, i.e., shifted right by 1). Row3: ". . A . . . . A ." same as input row3? Input row3 had A at col1 and col6. Output row3 has A at col2 and col7? Wait output row3: ". . A . . . . A ." => col2 and col7. Input row3: ". A . . . . A . ." => col1 and col6. So shifted right by 1. Row4: ". . . A . . . . A" => col3 and col8 (input had col2 and col7). Shift right by 1. Row5: ". . . . A . . . A" => col4 and col8? Actually output row5: ". . . . A . . . A" => col4 and col8. Input row5: ". . . A . . . . A" => col3 and col8. So leftmost A shifted right by 1, rightmost stays? Wait rightmost A at col8 unchanged. Row6: ". . . . A A A A A" => col4-8 same as input row6? Input row6: ". . . . A A A A A" same. So row6 unchanged. Thus rule: shift all A's one column to the right, except those in the "bass register" (bottom row?) and the rightmost voice (rightmost column?). Let's interpret metaphor: "All notes except those in the bass register and the rightmost voice shift one position closer to the root tone. The bass line and the anchor voice hold steady." So shift left? Actually "closer to the root tone" maybe leftwards? But we observed shift rightwards. Let's examine orientation: In example1, shape seems slanted down-right. Right edge drifts diagonally away from its bass note at bottom-right corner. So right edge is moving away from bottom-right. To tighten, we shift notes leftwards? But we saw shift rightwards. Wait maybe coordinate system reversed: columns increase to left? But typical grid left to right. Let's double-check: Input row2 had A's from col1-5. Output row2 has from col2-6 (shift right). So they moved away from left side, towards right side. That is ... [9222 chars truncated]
"A defensive line in a staggered formation snaps into alignment along the right sideline"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of player formations appear on a dark field. Each formation is a tilted quadrilateral — the right flank is staggered diagonally rather than standing in a straight column.
Do: Every player not already on the baseline or the rightmost column shuffles one step right. The baseline and sideline players hold position. The stagger tightens toward a squared-off formation.
Grid: Black is the field. Colored outlines are player positions. Grid unchanged. Formations are distinct and separated.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 8x9? Actually example input lines: 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . ." =9 columns. rows 8. Output also 8x9. We have shape of azure A forming a tilted quadrilateral (right flank staggered). The rule: "Every player not already on the baseline or the rightmost column shuffles one step right. The baseline and sideline players hold position. The stagger tightens toward a squared-off formation." Interpretation: baseline = bottom row? Rightmost column = column 9. Baseline maybe bottom row (last row before empty rows). In example, bottom row of shape is row 6 (index starting 0). That row has A A A A A across columns 5-9? Actually input row 6 (0-index row5) ". . . . A A A A A". That's 5 A's from col5 to col9 (1-index). In output row6 same ". . . . A A A A A" unchanged. So baseline (bottom of shape) stays. Rightmost column players hold position: any A in column 9 stays. Indeed there are A at column9 rows 2-5? Let's see input: row2 (index1) ". A A A A A . . ." has A up to column6? Actually columns: 1 '.'; 2 A;3 A;4 A;5 A;6 A;7 '.';8 '.';9 '.'. So rightmost column (9) empty. Row3 ". A . . . . A . ." has A at col2 and col7. col7 not rightmost. Row4 ". . A . . . . A ." has A at col3 and col8. Row5 ". . . A . . . . A" has A at col4 and col9 (rightmost). Row6 ". . . . A A A A A" has A at col5-9, includes rightmost. In output, we see shift right for non-baseline, non-rightmost. Let's compare row2 input vs output: input row2: A at cols2-6. Output row2: ". . A A A A A . ." So A's moved right by one column, except the rightmost column? In output they occupy cols3-7. Indeed shift right by 1. Row3 input: A at col2 and col7. Output row3: ". . A . . . . A ." => A at col3 and col8. Both shifted right by 1 (col2->3, col7->8). Row4 input: A at col3 and col8. Output row4: ". . . A . . . . A" => A at col4 and col9. Shift right by 1, but col9 is rightmost column, allowed? The rule said rightmost column players hold position, but this A moved into rightmost column from col8 to col9, which is allowed because it wasn't originally at rightmost? The rule maybe: players not already on baseline (bottom row of shape) shift right one step, unless they would go beyond grid? Rightmost column is boundary; they can shift into it if not already there. But description: "baseline and sideline players hold position." Sideline maybe leftmost column? Actually "rightmost column" is sideline? The metaphor says "right flank is staggered diagonally rather than standing in a straight column." So rightmost column is the right flank. They hold position (i.e., not shift). But in example, the A at col8 in row4 moved to col9, which is rightmost column, but originally not in rightmost column. So they moved into it, okay. Thus rule: For each colored cell (non-black) that is not on the bottommost row of its formation (baseline) shift it one column to the right. The bottom row stays. Also cells that are already at righ ... [3343 chars truncated]
"A sheared storm cloud reassembles as wind aloft shifts to match the surface flow"
120b: k=2
See: Colored outlines of cloud formations drift across a dark sky. Each cloud is a slanted parallelogram shape — upper portions displaced leftward from the base by wind shear.
Do: The upper and middle layers of each cloud drift one step downwind toward the anchored base and right edge. The cloud's base and rightmost column remain fixed. The shear diminishes.
Grid: Black sky is background. Colored outlines are cloud boundaries. Grid dimensions preserved. Clouds are separate and don't touch edges.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have clouds as slanted parallelogram shapes: upper portions displaced leftward from base. The rule: "The upper and middle layers of each cloud drift one step downwind toward the anchored base and right edge. The cloud's base and rightmost column remain fixed. The shear diminishes." Interpretation: For each colored shape (cloud), we shift its upper rows down and right by one cell, but keep the bottom row (base) and rightmost column unchanged. Also shape is slanted: each row is offset left relative to row below. Let's examine Example1. Input grid 8x9? Actually 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: Input lines show 9 columns? Example1 Input first row: ". . . . . . . . ." (9). There are 8 rows? Actually they show 8 rows then output also 8 rows. Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-7, cols 0-8. Input shape A forms a parallelogram: rows 1-5 have A's. Row1 (r=1): cols1-5 A (5 contiguous) Row2 (r=2): col1 A, col6 A (two ends) Row3 (r=3): col2 A, col8 A? Wait row3: ". . A . . . . A ." => col2 A, col7 A (since zero-index). Row4: ". . . A . . . . A" => col3 A, col8 A. Row5: ". . . . A A A A A" => cols4-8 A (5 contiguous). So shape is like a slanted parallelogram with base at row5 (bottom) spanning cols4-8, rightmost column col8 has A at rows3,4,5 (vertical line). Base row fixed. Output: Row1 becomes ". . A A A A A . ." (shifted right? originally row1 had A at cols1-5. Output row1 has A at cols2-6? Actually output row1: ". . A A A A A . ." => A at cols2-6 (5 contiguous). So moved right by 1, also maybe down? Not down because same row index? Wait row1 still row1. So upper layer moved right by 1, not down. But description says drift downwind toward anchored base and right edge. Downwind maybe meaning downwards (south) and rightwards (east). Let's see row2 output: ". . A . . . . A ." => A at col2 and col7. Input row2 had col1 and col6. So both shifted right by 1, same row. Row3 output: ". . . A . . . . A" => col3 and col8. Input row3 had col2 and col7. Shift right 1. Row4 output: ". . . . A . . . A" => col4 and col8? Wait output row4: ". . . . A . . . A" => A at col4 and col8. Input row4 had col3 and col8. So left A shifted right 1, rightmost column stays at col8 unchanged (since already at rightmost). Indeed rightmost column remains fixed. Row5 output: ". . . . A A A A A" same as input row5 (base). So base unchanged. Thus rule: For each shape, shift all cells except those in the bottom row (base) and those in the rightmost column of the shape, one step to the right (east). Also maybe also down? Not in example1. Let's check Example2. Example2 Input: shape M (magenta) similar parallelogram rows 1-5? Actually there are 5 rows of M (rows1-5). Let's map. Rows (0-index): 0: all . 1: ". M M M . . . . ." => M at cols1-3. 2: ". M . . M . . . ." => M at col1 and col4. 3: ". . M . . M . . ." => M at col2 and col5. 4: ". . . M . . M . ." => M at col3 and col6. 5: ". . . . M M M . ." => ... [7205 chars truncated]
"A leaning façade is buttressed until its right wall stands plumb"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of building façades rise from a dark ground plane. Each structure is a slanted open frame whose right wall tilts outward from the foundation.
Do: Every beam not resting on the foundation row or forming the rightmost pillar is nudged one unit toward the pillar. The foundation and right pillar are immovable. The lean corrects toward vertical.
Grid: Black is empty space. Colored outlines are structural frames. Grid size unchanged. Buildings are isolated and non-overlapping.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: "Colored outlines of building façades rise from a dark ground plane. Each structure is a slanted open frame whose right wall tilts outward from the foundation. What to do: Every beam not resting on the foundation row or forming the rightmost pillar is nudged one unit toward the pillar. The foundation and right pillar are immovable. The lean corrects toward vertical." Interpretation: We have shapes that look like slanted frames: maybe like a diagonal line from left to right? Let's examine example. Input grid 8x9? Actually example input lines: 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . ." that's 9 columns. Row2: ". A A A A A . . ." also 9. So grid 8x9. Output also 8x9. Let's map coordinates. Use row index starting 0 top. Input shape: Looks like a slanted rectangle? Let's draw positions of A. Row1 (index1): columns 1-5 are A (positions 1-5). Row2 (index2): column1 A, column6 A. Row3 (index3): column2 A, column7 A. Row4 (index4): column3 A, column8 A. Row5 (index5): columns4-8 A (positions 4-8). So shape is like a slanted open frame: left side vertical? Actually left side seems diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Let's list coordinates: (1,1)-(1,5) horizontal line top. (2,1) left vertical? (2,6) right side top? Actually row2 has A at col1 and col6. Row3: A at col2 and col7. Row4: A at col3 and col8. Row5: A at col4-8 horizontal bottom. So shape is like a "U" rotated? It's like a slanted rectangle: top horizontal, bottom horizontal, left side vertical (but slanted) and right side vertical (but slanted outward). The rightmost pillar is the rightmost column of the shape (col8 at row4, col6 at row2?). Wait rightmost pillar maybe the right side vertical line (the slanted right wall). The foundation row is bottom row of shape (row5). The rule: "Every beam not resting on the foundation row or forming the rightmost pillar is nudged one unit toward the pillar." So we shift all cells (beams) that are not on bottom row (foundation) and not part of rightmost pillar, one unit towards the rightmost pillar (i.e., horizontally right?). "Toward the pillar" meaning move horizontally towards the right side of shape (i.e., right direction). So shift them right by one cell, unless they are on bottom row or are part of rightmost pillar (i.e., the right side vertical line). The foundation and right pillar are immovable. Let's test with example: Input A positions not on bottom row (row5) and not rightmost pillar (right side). Which cells are rightmost pillar? The right side vertical line: positions (row2,col6), (row3,col7), (row4,col8). Those should stay. Also bottom row (row5, cols4-8) stays. All other A cells should shift right by one. Let's compute output: Starting from input, shift those cells. List all A cells: Row1: cols1-5. Among these, which are rightmost pillar? No, rightmost pillar only at rows2-4. So all these shift right by 1: become cols2-6. Row2: col1 (left side) shift right to col ... [7560 chars truncated]
"A skirmish line echeloned to the left wheels right to dress ranks on the anchor company"
120b: k=1
See: Colored outlines of troop formations appear on dark terrain. Each formation is a slanted quadrilateral — the right flank trails behind in a diagonal echelon.
Do: All units not in the base rank or the rightmost file advance one position rightward to close the echelon. The base rank and anchor file hold ground. The formation squares up.
Grid: Black terrain is background. Colored outlines are unit positions. Grid unchanged. Formations are separate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 8x8? Actually example input shows 8 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . ." that's 9 columns. So grid 8 rows x9 columns. Output also 8x9. We have azure A shape: looks like a slanted quadrilateral (right flank trailing). Let's map coordinates. Represent rows 0-7, cols0-8. Input A positions: Row1 (index1): cols1-5 are A (five contiguous) Row2: col1 and col6 are A (since ". A . . . . A . .") Row3: col2 and col8? Wait row3: ". . A . . . . A ." => cols2 and 7? Actually count: col0 .,1 .,2 A,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 A,8 . So col2 and7. Row4: ". . . A . . . . A" => cols3 and8. Row5: ". . . . A A A A A" => cols4-8 all A. So shape is like a right-leaning triangle? Let's visualize: It seems like a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right, with a base at bottom row (row5) spanning columns4-8. The rightmost column (col8) has A at rows3,4,5? Actually row3 col7, row4 col8, row5 col8. So rightmost file maybe column8? The description: "All units not in the base rank or the rightmost file advance one position rightward to close the echelon. The base rank and anchor file hold ground." Interpretation: For each formation, we shift all cells except those in the bottom row (base rank) and the rightmost column (anchor file) one step to the right. That would "close the echelon" making shape more rectangular? Let's test on example. Take input A cells not in bottom row (row5) and not in rightmost column (col8). Move them right by 1. Let's compute output A positions given. Output rows: Row1: ". . A A A A A . ." => A at cols2-6 (5 cells). Input row1 had A at cols1-5. Shifted right by 1 => cols2-6 matches output. Good, none were in bottom row or rightmost column (col8). So shift. Row2 output: ". . A . . . . A ." => A at col2 and col7. Input row2 had A at col1 and col6. Both not bottom row, not rightmost col8, shift right => col2 and col7 matches output. Row3 output: ". . . A . . . . A" => A at col3 and col8. Input row3 had A at col2 and col7. Shift right => col3 and col8 matches output. Note col8 is rightmost column; after shift, the cell that moved to col8 is now in rightmost file, but rule says rightmost file holds ground (i.e., they don't move further). That's fine. Row4 output: ". . . . A . . . A" => A at col4 and col8. Input row4 had A at col3 and col8. Wait input row4 had col3 and col8. The col3 not bottom row nor rightmost, shift to col4. The col8 is rightmost column, stays. Output matches. Row5 output: ". . . . A A A A A" => same as input row5 (bottom row). No shift. Thus rule matches: For each formation (connected shape), shift all cells right by one, except those that are already in the bottommost row of that formation (base rank) or in the rightmost column of the formation (anchor file). The bottom row and rightmost column stay. Now test input uses Y color. Need to apply same rule. First determine shape extents. Input grid 10 rows x9 columns? Let's count rows: given 10 r ... [4533 chars truncated]
"Actors in a raked blocking pattern shuffle stage-right to hit their spike marks against the wing"
120b: fail
See: Colored outlines of stage blocking patterns appear on a dark stage floor. Each pattern forms a slanted shape — performers are offset diagonally from the downstage-right mark.
Do: Every actor not on the downstage edge or the stage-right column shifts one step toward the wings. Those already at the base or the right wing hold position. The blocking tightens.
Grid: Black is the dark stage. Colored outlines are actor positions. Grid dimensions preserved. Blocking groups are separate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 8x9? Let's count: Example input lines: 8 rows, each 9 columns? Actually first line ". . . . . . . . ." 9 columns. Yes 8 rows, 9 columns. Output also 8x9. We see pattern: Input has azure A forming a shape: rows 2-6 (1-indexed). Output shifts some A left? Let's compare. Input row2: ". A A A A A . . ." (positions 2-6 are A). Output row2: ". . A A A A A . ." (positions 3-7 are A). So the block moved right by 1? Actually original had A from col2 to col6. Output has from col3 to col7. So shifted right one. Row3 input: ". A . . . . A . ." (col2 and col7). Output row3: ". . A . . . . A ." (col3 and col8). So each A moved right one column. Row4 input: ". . A . . . . A ." (col3 and col8). Output row4: ". . . A . . . . A" (col4 and col9). So shift right one. Row5 input: ". . . A . . . . A" (col4 and col9). Output row5: ". . . . A . . . A" (col5 and col9? Wait output row5: ". . . . A . . . A". That's col5 and col9. So leftmost A moved right one (col4->5). Rightmost A stays at col9 (since at right edge cannot move). Indeed rule: "Every actor not on the downstage edge or the stage-right column shifts one step toward the wings. Those already at the base or the right wing hold position." Downstage edge likely bottom row? Actually "downstage edge" maybe bottom row (base). Stage-right column is rightmost column. So actors not on bottom row nor rightmost column shift one step toward the wings (maybe right? Wait "toward the wings" could be right? In theater, wings are left and right sides. But they say "downstage edge or the stage-right column holds position". So shift towards the wings maybe left? Let's see: In example, actors shift right (increase column) unless at rightmost column. So they shift towards right wing (stage-right). So rule: shift right by one unless already at rightmost column or bottom row (downstage edge). Also bottom row (last row) holds position (no shift). In example, there are no actors in bottom row (row8). So not observed. Thus transformation: For each colored cell (non-black) that is not in bottom row (last row) and not in rightmost column, move it one column to the right (col+1). Cells in bottom row or rightmost column stay. Also need to preserve grid dimensions; overlapping? If two cells move into same spot? Possibly they may not overlap due to shape. But we need to handle. Now test input: 10 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . . ." 10 columns? Actually there are 10 entries separated by spaces. Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . ." that's 10 columns. Row count: there are 10 rows (lines). So grid 10x10. We have Y pattern similar to A pattern but with extra Y at row6 col10? Let's map coordinates (row index starting 1). Row1 all . (black). Row2: ". Y Y Y Y Y Y . . ." columns 2-7 Y. Row3: ". Y . . . . . Y . ." columns 2 and 8 Y. Row4: ". . Y . . . . . Y ." columns 3 and 9 Y. Row5: ". . . Y . . . . . Y" columns 4 and 10 Y. Row6: ". . . . Y Y Y Y Y Y" columns 5-10 Y ... [3185 chars truncated]
"A wind-bent trellis is staked upright from its rooted base"
120b: fail
See: Colored outlines of trellis frames stand in dark soil. Each trellis is a slanted lattice outline — the upper portions lean left of the firmly planted base and right post.
Do: Every joint not anchored to the ground rail or the rightmost stake is pulled one space rightward toward the stake. The base rail and right post are immovable. The trellis straightens.
Grid: Black is soil. Colored outlines are trellis frames. Grid unchanged. Trellises are isolated.
We need to understand rule. Input shows a shape: colored outline of trellis frames. In example, azure A shape forms a slanted lattice: looks like a diagonal line from left to right? Let's map coordinates. Example grid 8x9? Actually 8 rows, 9 columns? Input lines: first line ". . . . . . . . ." (9 columns). rows 0-7. Let's index rows 0-7, cols 0-8. Input A shape: row1 (index1) has A from col1 to col5 (5 As). row2 has A at col1 and col6. row3 has A at col2 and col7. row4 has A at col3 and col8. row5 has A from col4 to col8 (5 As). So shape looks like a slanted rectangle? It's like a right-leaning parallelogram with base at bottom row5 (row5 col4-8) and top row1 col1-5. Rightmost column is col8 (stake). Base rail is leftmost? Actually description: base rail (ground) is left side? "base rail and right post are immovable". The trellis slants left of base? Let's interpret: The shape is a slanted lattice outline where upper portions lean left of the firmly planted base and right post. So the shape is like a parallelogram leaning leftwards? The rule: "Every joint not anchored to the ground rail or the rightmost stake is pulled one space rightward toward the stake." So each joint (colored cell) that is not on the leftmost column (ground rail) nor on the rightmost column (rightmost stake) moves one cell to the right. The base rail (leftmost column?) and right post (rightmost column) are immovable. The trellis straightens. In example output: Let's see transformation. Input row1 had As at cols1-5. Output row1 has As at cols2-6? Actually output row1: ". . . . . . . . ." row0 unchanged. Row1 (index1) output: ". . A A A A A . ." So As at cols2-6 (5 As). Indeed shifted right by 1, but note col1 (original leftmost of shape) moved to col2. However col5 original (rightmost of shape) moved to col6, but col6 is not rightmost stake? Rightmost stake column is col8 (since shape extends to col8). So all As moved right by 1, except those that are at col8? Let's check row2: input row2 (index2) As at col1 and col6. Output row2: ". . A . . . . A ." As at col2 and col7. So both moved right by 1. Row3 input As at col2 and col7. Output row3: ". . . A . . . . A" As at col3 and col8. So rightmost moved to col8 (still moved right). Row4 input As at col3 and col8. Output row4: ". . . . A . . . A" As at col4 and col8? Wait output row4: ". . . . A . . . A". That's As at col4 and col8. The one at col8 stayed at col8 (did not move). Because it's anchored to rightmost stake. So rule: cells at rightmost column (col8) stay. Others shift right by 1, unless they would collide? Also leftmost base rail maybe column0? But there were no As at col0. So base rail immovable but not relevant. Thus transformation: For each colored shape (non-black), shift all its cells right by 1, except those already at the rightmost column of the shape's bounding box? Actually anchored to rightmost stake column (global rightmost column of grid? In example grid width 9, rightmost column index8. The stake is at ... [4027 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 15x15 grid with a black background containing several single colored pixels (dots) scattered at various positions. Each dot is a different color. The dots' row positions determine how the output grid is partitioned into horizontal bands.
Do: 1. Identify all colored dots in the input grid and record each dot's color and row index. Ignore column positions. 2. Sort the dots by row index from top to bottom. 3. Partition the 15 rows into consecutive bands by computing midpoints between adjacent dots' row indices. The boundary between two adjacent dots at rows r1 and r2 is floor((r1 + r2) / 2) + 1, meaning the first band ends at row floor((r1+r2)/2) and the next band starts at floor((r1+r2)/2)+1. The topmost band starts at row 0 and the bottommost band ends at row 14. 4. For each band, fill it with its dot's color as follows: a. The row where the dot originally sat becomes a full solid horizontal line (all 15 cells filled with the dot's color). b. The first and last rows of the entire grid (row 0 and row 14), if they fall within this band, also become full solid horizontal lines of the dot's color. c. All other rows in the band become border rows: only the leftmost cell (column 0) and rightmost cell (column 14) are filled with the dot's color; the interior cells (columns 1-13) remain black.
Grid: Both input and output grids are 15x15. The background color is black (.). The input contains exactly N single-colored pixels (N varies per puzzle instance) placed at distinct positions. The output uses the full 15x15 grid, partitioned into N horizontal bands with no gaps or overlaps, each rendered as a rectangular frame segment in the corresponding dot's color.
"Seeds dropped in soil grow into sedimentary rock layers, each mineral claiming its stratum of the earth."
120b: k=1
See: A column of dark earth stretches before you. Scattered at different depths, tiny mineral seeds sit buried — each a different color, each waiting to crystallize. Their depth is everything; their left-right position is forgotten the moment they begin to grow.
Do: Each seed awakens and claims a horizontal stratum of the earth proportional to the space between its neighbors above and below. Where the seed was planted, a solid vein of ore runs the full width of the earth — the densest concentration. At the very surface and the very bottom of the world, exposed strata also harden into solid bands. Everywhere else within a stratum, the mineral only lines the walls — crystallizing along the left and right edges while the interior remains hollow dark rock, like a geode split open.
Grid: The earth is a 15-layer-deep cross-section. Each mineral seed is a single colored speck in the dark. Once they crystallize, the entire cross-section is claimed — no dark void is left unowned. Each stratum is a hollow corridor: solid colored ceiling where the seed sat, colored walls on left and right edges, and darkness filling the interior between them.
We need to understand rule. From example: Input 15x15 grid with three colored seeds: R at row4 col7? Let's index rows 0-14. Input shows R at row3 (0-index) column6? Actually row4 line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So column6 (0-index). O at row7 col8? line: ". . . . . . . . O . . . . . ." column8. A at row12 col3? line: ". . . A . . . . . . . . . . ." column3. Output: shows horizontal bands. For each seed, a band spanning rows? Let's examine output rows. Rows 0-14 output given. Row0: all R across entire row. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Actually row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So R at edges only. Row2 same. Row3: all R. Row4: R at edges only. Row5: R at edges only. Row6: O at edges only? Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Yes O edges. Row7: all O. Row8: O edges only. Row9: O edges only. Row10: A edges only? Row10: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row11 same. Row12: all A. Row13: A edges only. Row14: all A. So pattern: For each seed, we create a horizontal stratum whose height equals distance between neighboring seeds (including top and bottom boundaries). The seed row becomes the "solid ceiling" (full row of that color). The bottom of stratum becomes solid floor? Actually bottom row of stratum also solid? In example, for R stratum: top boundary is row0 (top of world) solid R. Then rows1-2 are walls only (R at leftmost and rightmost). Then row3 (seed row) is solid R. Then rows4-5 are walls only. Then row6 is start of next stratum O with walls only? Wait O stratum top row is row6? Actually O stratum top row is row6 walls only, row7 solid O, row8-9 walls only, then row10 start of A stratum walls only, row12 solid A, etc. At bottom, final stratum bottom row (row14) solid A. Thus each stratum consists of: top solid row (if at top boundary) else walls only? Let's examine O stratum: The seed O is at row7. The rows above O within its stratum are rows6 (walls only). The top of O stratum is row6 (walls only) not solid. The solid row appears at seed row (row7). The bottom of O stratum is row10? Actually bottom of O stratum is row9 walls only, then next stratum A starts at row10 walls only. So bottom solid row appears at bottom boundary (row14) for last stratum. For first stratum, top boundary solid row appears at row0. So rule: At world top and bottom, the stratum's outermost rows become solid across full width. For interior strata, only the seed row is solid; the rows at the boundaries between strata are walls only (colored at leftmost and rightmost columns). So each stratum height = distance between seeds (including boundaries). The seed row is somewhere within stratum: its position relative to top? In example, R seed at row3, stratum height from top (row0) to next seed O row7? Actually distance between R seed row3 and O seed row7 is 4 rows (rows4-7?). But stratum includes rows0-5? Wait R stratum includes rows0-5. That's 6 rows. Let's compute: top boundary row0, seed row3, next seed row7. The stratum extends from top boundar ... [11122 chars truncated]
"Lone cells floating in a dark medium each emit a hormone that claims surrounding tissue. Each cell's signal spreads horizontally to form a membrane, while the edges of the organism's body wall thicken with the nearest cell's pigment. Between membranes, only the skin of the organism — its outermost left and right margins — shows the stain."
120b: k=1
See: A dark tissue sample with isolated colored cells at various depths.
Do: Each cell's influence radiates outward to dominate a horizontal zone of the body. The cell's own depth becomes a full membrane wall. The organism's outer skin within that zone takes on the cell's color. Interior tissue between membranes stays dark, touched only at the body's left and right edges.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Input has colored single cells on black. Output partitions rows into colored band-frames based on cell positions.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 15x15 with three colored single cells: R at (row3? let's index 0). Let's map coordinates. Example1 input: rows 0-14. R at row3 col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." that's row3 (0-index). So column6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows bands: rows partitioned into three horizontal zones each associated with a color. The zone for each cell includes its row as full wall (full row of that color). Also above and below? Let's examine output: rows 0-? The top zone appears red rows 0-3? Output rows 0-3 are all red. Row0: all R. Row1: R at first and last column, interior .? Actually row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So border red, interior black. Row2 similar. Row3: all R. So zone height =? The cell at row3 becomes full row of red (wall). Rows above (0-2) have red border only. Rows below (4-?) until next zone? Row4-6 have pattern: row4: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". Row5 same. Row6 same. So red border continues until row6. Then row7 is O zone start: row7: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O"? Actually output row7: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Wait check: In output given, after row6 (R . . ... R), row7 is "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row8 is "O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O". Row9: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row10: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Then row11: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row12: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row13: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". Row14: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Wait need to verify mapping: Actually output lines after row6: Let's list given output: Row0: R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Row1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row2: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row3: R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Row4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row5: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row7: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Row8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row9: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row11: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row12: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Row13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row14: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Wait there are 15 rows, but we have 15 lines. Let's map: Actually row indices 0-14. The pattern: each zone has a full row of color at the cell's row (wall). The rows above the wall up to previous wall have border of that color (first and last column) and interior black. The rows below the wall until next wall have border of that color as well? In example, after red wall at row3, rows4-5 have red border. Row6 is O border (but not full O row). That suggests that the zone for O starts at row6? But O cell is at row7 col8. The full O row appears at row7 (all O). So row6 is just border O (first and last column O). So the zone for O includes rows6-9? Actually rows6-9 have O border, with row7 full O. Row8-9 border O. Then row10 is A border (first and last column A). Row11 border A. Row12 full A. Row13 bord ... [8606 chars truncated]
"Colored stars appear at various declinations in a dark sky survey. Each star's radiation ionizes a full horizontal emission band at its declination. Between emission bands, only the edges of the survey frame — the leftmost and rightmost columns — fluoresce with the nearest star's color, like a faint halo tracing the detector boundaries."
120b: k=2
See: A dark sky field with isolated colored stars at different vertical positions.
Do: Each star produces a full horizontal emission line at its row. The survey frame edges between lines carry the nearest star's hue. The top and bottom frame edges solidify under their governing star.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Stars become solid horizontal lines with colored frame-edge borders between them.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has colored single cells (stars) at various rows. Output: each star expands to full horizontal line of its color across entire row (including edges). Additionally, there are "frame edges" between lines that take nearest star's hue. Looking at example1: Input stars: R at row3? Actually rows indexed 0-14. Input shows R at (3,6) (row3 col6). O at (7,8). A at (12,3). Output: rows 0-14 have patterns. Let's map output rows: Row0: all R (full line) Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest '.'? Actually output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So edges R, interior '.'. Row2 similar. Row3: all R. Row4: edges R, interior '.'. Row5: edges R. Row6: O at col0 and col14, interior '.'? Actually row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Yes. Row7: all O. Row8: edges O. Row9: edges O. Row10: A at col0 and col14, interior '.'. Row11: same. Row12: all A. Row13: edges A. Row14: all A. So pattern: For each star, its row becomes a "band" of three rows? Actually for each star, there is a block of rows: top row of block is full line of that color, middle rows have edges colored, bottom row full line? Let's examine: For R star at row3 (input). Output rows 0-5 correspond to R region? Actually rows 0-5 are R region. That's 6 rows: rows 0-5. Input star row3 is middle of that region? Indeed row3 is full line (center). Rows 0-2 are full line? Row0 full, rows1-2 edges only. Wait row0 full, row1 edges, row2 edges, row3 full, row4 edges, row5 edges. So pattern: The region for a star spans from previous star's region boundary to next star's region boundary. The topmost region starts at top edge (row0) and ends halfway to next star? Let's analyze more. Stars order by row: R at row3, O at row7, A at row12. Output shows three color zones: R zone rows0-5, O zone rows6-9, A zone rows10-14. Each zone height: R zone 6 rows (0-5), O zone 4 rows (6-9), A zone 5 rows (10-14). Not equal. The rule described: "Each star produces a full horizontal emission line at its row. The survey frame edges between lines carry the nearest star's hue. The top and bottom frame edges solidify under their governing star." Means: The row of the star becomes full line of that color. The rows between star rows become edges colored with nearest star's hue (i.e., the nearest star above or below). The topmost rows above first star become full line of first star? Actually top edge rows (above first star) become full line of that star (R). Similarly bottom rows below last star become full line of last star (A). In example1, rows above R (rows0-2) become R full line at row0 only? Wait row0 full, rows1-2 edges only. So not full line for all rows above star. Let's examine: The "frame edges between lines" maybe refer to the leftmost and rightmost columns (edges) being colored with nearest star's hue, while interior remains '.' except the star row which is full line. Indeed output shows only edges colored (col0 and col14) for rows that are not star rows. The star rows are full ... [6329 chars truncated]
"Colored buoys are anchored at different depths in a dark water column. Each buoy trails a full horizontal net across the channel at its depth. Between nets, only the harbor walls — the leftmost and rightmost positions — are painted with the nearest buoy's color, like waterline marks on a canal lock. The surface and seabed edges solidify when they fall within a buoy's jurisdiction."
120b: k=1
See: A dark water column with colored buoys at various depths.
Do: Each buoy stretches a solid horizontal net at its depth. Harbor walls between nets carry the nearest buoy's color. The water surface and seabed become solid lines if within a buoy's zone.
Grid: 15x15. Colored pixels become horizontal nets with colored wall-marks between them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored cells: R at (row3? actually zero-index?). Let's index rows 0-14. Example1 input: R at row3 col6? Let's map: row3 (0-index) line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So column6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output: large horizontal bands of each color, with walls between them colored with nearest buoy's color. Essentially each colored pixel creates a horizontal stripe (full row) of its color across entire width, but also vertical walls? Let's examine output rows. Rows 0-14 output: Row0: all R. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Actually row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So edges R, interior . . So row1 is between top of R stripe and next? Let's see pattern: The R stripe appears rows 0-3? Actually rows 0-3 output are all R (full rows). Row0 full R. Row1 edges R. Row2 edges R. Row3 full R. So stripe of R occupies rows 0-3 inclusive, with top and bottom full, middle rows have only edges R. Similarly O stripe rows 4-7? Let's see output rows 4: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" (edges R). Row5: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row7: all O. Row8: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row9: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row10: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row11: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row12: all A. Row13: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row14: all A. Observations: The colored buoys at certain rows: R at row3, O at row7, A at row12. The output shows horizontal bands centered on those rows, extending outward until meeting another buoy's zone? The pattern: For each buoy, its color fills a "zone" that is the region of rows closer to that buoy than any other buoy (in vertical distance). Within each zone, the topmost and bottommost rows of the zone have full color across width; interior rows have color only at leftmost and rightmost columns (edges). So essentially we draw horizontal "walls" (edges) of the zone with the buoy's color, and fill the interior of the zone with black (.)? But the interior rows have '.' except edges. The full rows maybe represent the "water surface" and "seabed" within zone? The description: "Harbor walls between nets carry the nearest buoy's color. The water surface and seabed become solid lines if within a buoy's zone." So each buoy creates a horizontal net (full line) at its depth (row). The walls (vertical columns) between nets are colored with nearest buoy's color. The water surface (top) and seabed (bottom) become solid lines if within a buoy's zone. So topmost row of zone (closest to top of grid) becomes full line of that color, similarly bottommost row of zone (closest to next buoy or bottom) becomes full line. Thus algorithm: Given input with colored cells at distinct rows (maybe multiple columns but only one per row). Determine ordering by row. For each region of rows between two buoys (including edges), assign the color of the nearer buoy (by vertical distance). For rows exactly at b ... [5435 chars truncated]
"Colored charge carriers are trapped at different layers of a dark semiconductor. Each carrier saturates its layer into a full conductive trace across the chip's width. Between traces, only the chip's edge contacts — the leftmost and rightmost pins — carry the nearest layer's voltage. The chip's top and bottom package boundaries also conduct fully when within a carrier's domain."
120b: k=1
See: A dark chip cross-section with isolated colored charges at different layers.
Do: Each charge becomes a full horizontal conductive trace. Edge pins between traces carry the nearest charge's voltage. Package boundaries solidify under their governing charge.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Scattered charges become horizontal traces with colored edge-contacts between them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with three colored points: R at (row4,col7?) Let's index 0-based. Input example1: R at row3 col6 (since rows start 0). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands of each color filling rows? Let's examine output: first row all R. second row: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Actually output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So edges have R, interior . . Row2 similar. Row3 all R. So pattern: For each charge, we create a horizontal stripe (full row) of that color across entire width, but only within a vertical region bounded by something? Let's see: R appears in rows 0-3? Actually rows 0-3 are R rows (full). Then rows 4-5 have R at edges only. Row6 O at edges. Row7 full O. Row8-9 O edges. Row10-11 A edges. Row12 full A. Row13 A edges. Row14 full A. So each charge creates a horizontal band of its color spanning multiple rows: a central full row, plus adjacent rows with only edge cells colored? Looks like pattern: For each charge, we fill a 5-row tall region: top row full, next two rows edges only, middle row full, next two rows edges only? Wait for R region: rows0-4? Actually rows0-3 full R, rows4-5 edges only. That's 6 rows? Let's map: R region seems rows0-5? Row0 full, row1 edges, row2 edges, row3 full, row4 edges, row5 edges? But row5 edges are R? Yes row5 has R at edges. So pattern: a 6-row block: rows0-5. Within that, rows0 and3 are full, rows1,2,4,5 edges only. That's like a pattern of period 3? Let's examine O region rows6-10: row6 edges O, row7 full O, row8 edges O, row9 edges O, row10 edges A? Wait row10 is A edges, not O. So O region maybe rows6-9? Actually row6 edges O, row7 full O, row8 edges O, row9 edges O. That's 4 rows? Not matching. Let's think differently: maybe each charge expands horizontally across its row, and also vertically to fill a rectangle bounded by nearest other charges or grid edges. Edge pins between traces carry nearest charge's voltage: meaning columns between charges become colored at edges? Hmm. Maybe rule: For each colored cell, fill its entire row with that color, but only up to the nearest other colored cell in same column? Not. Look at positions: R at (3,6). O at (7,8). A at (12,3). In output, the full rows of each color correspond to rows of the charge? R full rows at row0 and row3? Actually row3 is where R originally located. Row0 also full R (top). O full row at row7 (original). Also row? O full row at row? only row7. A full rows at row12 and row14? Actually A original at row12 col3. Output has full A rows at row12 and row14 (bottom). So maybe fill from charge row downwards until hitting another charge's region, and also fill upwards to edge? For R, upward to top (row0) full, downward until before O region? O region starts at row6? Actually O region starts row6 edges, row7 full. So R region occupies rows0-5. That's up to row5 inclusive, then O region starts row6. So R region extends down until just before next charge's row (row7). ... [5571 chars truncated]
"Colored runes are carved at different heights on a dark monolith. Each rune awakens, sending its power surging across the full width of the stone at its inscribed height. Between awakened rune-lines, the monolith's edges — its left and right faces — shimmer with the glow of whichever rune governs that span. The crown and base of the monolith blaze fully when they fall within a rune's dominion."
120b: k=1
See: A dark monolith with isolated colored runes at various heights.
Do: Each rune blazes into a full horizontal band of power at its height. The monolith's side faces between bands glow with the nearest rune's color. The crown and base solidify under their governing rune.
Grid: 15x15. Rune pixels become solid horizontal lines with glowing edge-pillars between them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15. In example, there are three colored single pixels: R at (row3? actually zero-index? Let's map). Input rows 0-14. R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands of each color spanning full width, with edges of other colors? Let's examine output. Output rows: Row0: all R Row1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row2: same as row1 Row3: all R Row4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row5: same Row6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row7: all O Row8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row9: same Row10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row11: same Row12: all A Row13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row14: all A Observations: For each rune (single pixel) at a certain row, the output creates a horizontal band of that color spanning full width, but with pattern: the band consists of three rows? Actually for R: rows 0-5? Let's see: rows 0-5 contain R band. Row0 full R. Row1-2 have R at edges only (first and last column) and interior black. Row3 full R again. Row4-5 edges R. So pattern: a 5-row tall band? Actually rows 0-5 inclusive = 6 rows. But pattern seems: top row full, then two rows edges, then middle full, then two rows edges. That's 5 rows? Wait count: rows 0,1,2,3,4,5 = 6 rows. Pattern: full, edge, edge, full, edge, edge. That's like repeating pattern of full then two edge rows, maybe representing a "solid band with glowing side faces". The description: "Each rune blazes into a full horizontal band of power at its height. The monolith's side faces between bands glow with the nearest rune's color. The crown and base solidify under their governing rune." So maybe the band is 3 rows thick? But we see 6 rows for each rune. However there are three runes at different heights: R at row3, O at row7, A at row12. Output shows bands overlapping? Let's see rows 6-9 correspond to O band: rows6 edge, row7 full, row8 edge, row9 edge? Actually row6 edge, row7 full, row8 edge, row9 edge (no full). Wait row9 edge only, not full. But pattern for O: rows6 edge, row7 full, rows8-9 edge, then next band A starts at row10 edge, row11 edge, row12 full, row13 edge, row14 full? Actually row14 full A. So A band seems rows10 edge,11 edge,12 full,13 edge,14 full. That's not symmetric. Maybe the rule: For each colored pixel, fill its row with that color across entire width. Then also fill the column of that pixel with that color at the edges? Not. Let's examine column positions: The edge columns (first and last) have colors matching the nearest band above? Row1 first column R, last column R. Row2 same. Row4,5 same. Row6 first column O, last column O. Row8,9 O edges. Row10,11 A edges. Row13 A edges. Row14 full A. So edges are colored with the color of the band that is "closest" vertically? The description: "side faces between bands glow with the nearest rune's color." So the side faces (first and last column) are colored with the nearest rune's color (i.e., the nearest colored row). So for ... [6272 chars truncated]
"Colored dancers take positions at different heights on a dark vertical stage. Each dancer extends their arms into a full horizontal formation across the stage at their level. Between formations, only the dancers at the wings — the far left and far right positions — hold the nearest formation's color in a posed frame. The stage floor and ceiling become full formations when they fall within a dancer's domain."
120b: k=2
See: A dark vertical stage with isolated colored dancers at various heights.
Do: Each dancer spreads into a full horizontal line at their level. Wing positions between lines hold the nearest dancer's color. Stage boundaries become full lines under their governing dancer.
Grid: 15x15. Colored dots become horizontal formations with colored wing-poses between them.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has colored single cells at various rows and columns. Output expands each color into horizontal lines across entire row (full width) at the rows where the color appears, but also creates vertical "wings" between rows? Let's examine Example1. Input positions: R at (row3? zero-index? Let's index rows 0-14). Input shows R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output: Let's see rows. Row0: all R. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Actually output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So R at edges only. Row2 similar. Row3: all R. Row4: R at edges. Row5: R at edges. Row6: O at edges? Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Yes O at edges. Row7: all O. Row8: O at edges. Row9: O at edges. Row10: A at edges. Row11: A at edges. Row12: all A. Row13: A at edges. Row14: all A. Pattern: For each color, there is a block of rows: the row where the original dot is, plus rows above and below until reaching another color's block? Actually R block occupies rows 0-5? Let's list: rows 0-5 have R at edges or full. Row0 full R, rows1-2 edges, row3 full, rows4-5 edges. That's 6 rows total (0-5). Input R at row3 (middle). So block extends symmetrically up and down until hitting another color's block? Next color O block rows6-9 (4 rows). Input O at row7 (within). Row6 edges O, row7 full O, rows8-9 edges O. That's 4 rows. Next A block rows10-14 (5 rows). Input A at row12. Row10-11 edges A, row12 full A, rows13-14 edges A (but row14 full A? Actually row14 all A). Wait row14 is full A, not edge only. Let's check: output row14: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". Yes full. So pattern maybe: topmost block starts with full row at top, then edges, then full at original row, then edges, then bottom full row? For R block: top row0 full, then rows1-2 edges, row3 full (original), rows4-5 edges, then next block starts with O edges row6 (not full). So after R block, there is no full row before O block; O block starts with edges row6, then full row7 (original), then edges rows8-9, then next block A starts with edges row10? Actually row10 edges A, row11 edges A, row12 full A (original), rows13 edges, row14 full (bottom). So bottommost block ends with full row. Observation: The full rows appear at the original positions of each color, and also at the very top row (row0) and bottom row (row14) regardless of color? In example1 top row is full R (color of topmost dancer). Bottom row full A (color of bottommost dancer). So topmost color's block includes full row at top; bottommost includes full row at bottom. Similarly example2: Input colors: A at row1 col6, B at row3 col11, R at row7 col3, G at row9 col5. Output rows: Row0: all A (top full of topmost color A) Row1: all A (original row of A) actually row1 full A as well. Wait row0 also full A. Row2: A edges only? Output row2: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Yes edges A. Row3: all B (original row of B). Row4-5 edges B. Row6: R edges? Actually row6: "R . . . . . . . . . ... [6987 chars truncated]
"Colored mineral veins are exposed at different depths in a dark cliff face. Each vein runs a solid horizontal seam across the full width of the outcrop. Between seams, only the cliff's exposed left and right edges show the nearest mineral's color, like oxidation staining on the rock face. The cliff top and base solidify with whatever mineral governs those extremes."
120b: k=1
See: A dark cliff cross-section with isolated colored mineral points at various depths.
Do: Each mineral point extends into a full horizontal seam. The cliff edges between seams stain with the nearest mineral's color. The cliff's top and base become full seams if within a mineral's zone.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Mineral dots become solid seams with colored cliff-edge staining between them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 15x15 with some colored points: R at (row3? actually zero-index?). Let's map coordinates. Example1 input: there is R at row3 col6? Let's index rows 0-14. Row3 (0-based) line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So column6 (0-based). O at row7 col8? Row7 line: ". . . . . . . . O . . . . . ." column8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands: top rows all R, then rows with R edges etc. Let's examine output pattern: rows 0-14. Row0: all R. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest . (black) Row2: same as row1. Row3: all R. Row4: R at edges, rest . Row5: same. Row6: O at edges, rest . Row7: all O. Row8: O at edges, rest . Row9: same. Row10: A at edges, rest . Row11: same. Row12: all A. Row13: A at edges, rest . Row14: all A. So pattern: each mineral point creates a horizontal "seam" (full row of that color) at its row? Actually R point at row3 leads to full row of R at row0? Wait row0 is R full, row3 also full. So there are multiple rows of R. Let's see: The R point at row3 col6. Output shows full rows of R at rows 0,3,? also row? Row? Actually rows 0,3,? also row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Let's list rows with full R: row0, row3, maybe row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Actually row0 and row3 and row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Let's check output rows: row0 all R, row1 edges R, row2 edges R, row3 all R, row4 edges R, row5 edges R, row6 edges O, row7 all O, row8 edges O, row9 edges O, row10 edges A, row11 edges A, row12 all A, row13 edges A, row14 all A. So R appears in rows 0-5 only. O appears rows6-9. A rows10-14. Thus each mineral defines a vertical region? Actually the "cliff edges between seams stain with the nearest mineral's color". So we have three minerals at different depths (rows). The output shows horizontal bands: topmost band (rows 0-5) colored R, middle band (rows6-9) O, bottom band (rows10-14) A. Within each band, the full rows (every other row?) are fully colored, while the rows in between have only edges colored (first and last column) with that color, interior black. Specifically for each band, the topmost row of band is full color, then next two rows have edges only, then next row full, etc? Let's examine R band rows 0-5: pattern: row0 full, rows1-2 edges, row3 full, rows4-5 edges. So within band, full rows appear at start and then every 3 rows? Actually band height = 6 rows (0-5). Full rows at rows 0 and 3 (spacing 3). Edges rows others. Similarly O band rows6-9 (height 4): row6 edges, row7 full, row8 edges, row9 edges? Wait row9 edges, but there is no second full row because height 4. Pattern maybe: start with edges, then full, then edges, then edges? Not consistent. Let's examine A band rows10-14 (height5): rows10-11 edges, row12 full, rows13 edges, row14 full. So pattern: edges, edges, full, edges, full. Maybe rule: For each mineral point, extend horizontally across its row (full seam). Then fill rows between minerals with nearest mineral's color at edges only, and fil ... [6443 chars truncated]
"Drops of different-colored spices fall into a tall glass of dark broth at various heights. Each spice dissolves into a full horizontal ribbon at its resting depth, and the broth between ribbons takes on only a thin film of color along the glass walls, like condensation clinging to the sides of the vessel."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall dark vessel with isolated spice drops suspended at different levels.
Do: Each drop melts into a complete horizontal band at its depth. The glass walls between adjacent bands show edge-coloring from the nearest spice. The top and bottom rims of the glass also solidify with whatever spice governs that region.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Scattered colored pixels become horizontal partitions with colored borders.
"Notes are scattered across a dark staff at different pitches. Each note resonates, filling its register with a sustained drone — a solid bar of sound at the note's own pitch, while the edges of the register hum faintly like sympathetic strings vibrating only at the margins of the soundboard."
120b: k=1
See: Isolated colored notes placed at various vertical positions on a silent dark field.
Do: Each note claims a horizontal register. At the note's own pitch, a full solid bar sounds across the width. At the register's boundaries and the staff's outer edges, only the outermost positions resonate. The interior stays silent.
Grid: 15x15. Single colored pixels become banded horizontal zones with solid center-lines and framed borders.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has isolated colored pixels at various positions. Output shows horizontal bands (bars) for each color, with solid center line across width, and borders at top and bottom of band? Let's examine. Input example1: grid 15x15. There are three colored pixels: R at (row3? Actually zero-index? Let's index rows 0-14. Input shows R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output: For each color, there is a horizontal zone (band) of height? Let's see R band occupies rows 0-3? Actually output rows 0-3 are all R across entire row. Row0: all R. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Wait output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So border R at leftmost and rightmost columns, interior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .? Actually there are 15 columns, row1 has R at col0 and col14, rest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13 dots). Row2 similar. Row3 all R. Thus R band height = 4 rows (rows0-3). Within band, top row all R, bottom row all R, middle rows have R only at leftmost and rightmost columns (forming vertical borders). So a solid bar across width with border only at edges? Actually description: "At the note's own pitch, a full solid bar sounds across the width. At the register's boundaries and the staff's outer edges, only the outermost positions resonate. The interior stays silent." So each note defines a horizontal register (band). At the note's own pitch (the row where the note is located) we have full solid bar across width. At the register's boundaries (top and bottom rows of the band) and the staff's outer edges (leftmost and rightmost columns) only outermost positions are colored (i.e., only at edges). The interior stays silent (dots). So the band includes the note row plus some rows above and below? How many? In example, for R note at row3 (0-index). The band includes rows 0-3? That's 4 rows, with note row being row3 (the bottom of band). Wait note row is row3 (since input row3 col6). In output, row3 is full R (solid). Row0 is also full R (top). So band extends upward from note row to top of grid? Actually note row is at bottom of band, not middle. Let's examine O note at row7 col8. Output O band rows 6-9? Let's see output rows 6-9: Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row7: "O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O". Row8: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row9: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Wait row7 is full O (solid). Row6 and 8-9 have O at edges only. So band height = 4 rows? Actually rows 6-9 inclusive = 4 rows. Note row is row7 (full). Top of band row6 has edges only, not full. Bottom row8? Actually row8 also edges only, row9 also edges only. So bottom of band extends two rows below note? That's odd. Now A note at row12 col3. Output rows 10-14? Let's see rows 10-14: Row10: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row11: same. Row12: full A. Row13: edges only. Row14: full A? Wait row14 is "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". Actually output row14 is full A. Let's list output rows from example: Row0: ... [10347 chars truncated]
"Coaches stand at different yard lines on a darkened field. Each coach's whistle blast paints their territory line solid across the width of the field. Between territories, only the sideline markings glow with the nearest coach's color — the interior turf stays dark until you hit the next coach's line."
120b: k=1
See: A dark playing field with isolated colored figures standing at scattered positions.
Do: Each figure claims a horizontal territory. Their own yard line becomes a solid stripe. The field's sidelines within their zone show their color. All interior ground between lines remains dark.
Grid: 15x15 grid partitioned into horizontal territories with solid lines and colored sideline edges.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored cells (R, O, A). Output shows horizontal stripes: each color expands to fill a horizontal band (rows) with solid border lines of that color at top and bottom of band, and interior rows have color only at leftmost and rightmost columns? Let's examine. Example1 Input: positions: R at (row3? zero-index?) Let's index rows 0-14. Input shows R at row3 col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." That's row3 (0-index). O at row7 col8? line: ". . . . . . . . O . . . . . ." That's row7 col8. A at row12 col3? line: ". . . A . . . . . . . . . . ." That's row12 col3. Output: rows 0-14. Let's view output rows: Row0: all R across. Row1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row2: same as row1. Row3: all R. Row4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row5: same. Row6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row7: all O. Row8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row9: same. Row10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row11: same. Row12: all A. Row13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row14: all A. Observations: For each color, there is a 5-row band? Let's see R occupies rows 0-5? Actually rows 0-5 have R border lines: rows0 and3 are full R, rows1,2,4,5 have R at columns0 and14 only. That's a pattern: a 3x? Wait band height maybe 4? Let's map: Input R at row3 col6. Output shows R band spanning rows0-5 (6 rows). Within that band, top row (row0) full R, middle rows (1,2) have R at edges, row3 full R, rows4,5 edges. So pattern: a stripe of height 6 with full rows at top and middle? Actually there are two full rows: first row of band and middle row (row3). The band seems centered on original R row? Original R at row3 (0-index). In output, row3 is full R (center). Also row0 is full R (top of band). So band extends upward to top of grid? Wait top row is row0 full R, which is 3 rows above original. So band height maybe 6 rows: from row0 to row5 inclusive. The original row becomes the middle full row? Let's compute: original row index 3. Band rows 0-5 => middle of band is row2.5? Not exactly. But row3 is full, which is 3 rows from top. So maybe rule: For each colored cell, fill its entire row with that color, and also fill column edges? Not. Look at O: Input O at row7 col8. Output O band rows6-9? Actually rows6-9 inclusive: rows6 edge, row7 full, row8 edge, row9 edge? Wait row9 also edge. Row7 full O, row6 edge O, row8 edge O, row9 edge O. That's 4 rows band (6-9). Not symmetric. A: Input A at row12 col3. Output A band rows10-14? Actually rows10-14 inclusive: rows10 edge, row11 edge, row12 full, row13 edge, row14 full. That's 5 rows? Row14 full A as bottom. So pattern: each color creates a horizontal band that extends to top or bottom edges? For A, bottom rows are full A (row14) and also row12 full. For R, top row full. For O, maybe both top and bottom? Not. Let's think differently: The rule might be: For each colored cell, draw a rectangle that spans the entire width of grid, with the colored cell's row as the mi ... [6062 chars truncated]
"Lightning strikes land at different altitudes in a dark storm column. Each bolt ionizes the air at its own height into a continuous bright band, and the static charge creeps along the edges of the storm front above and below — tracing only the left and right walls of the thunderhead until it meets the next bolt's domain."
120b: k=1
See: A dark atmospheric column with isolated colored sparks at various heights.
Do: Each spark's altitude becomes a fully charged horizontal band. The storm's outer walls within that spark's zone carry its charge. The interior air stays dark. The top and bottom of the storm solidify if they fall within a zone.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Colored pixels define horizontal weather bands with solid lines and edge-traced borders.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored single pixels: R at (row4,col7?) Let's index rows 0-14. Example1 input: R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands of each color spanning full width, with borders of same color at edges? Let's examine output pattern. Output rows: first row all R. second row: R at col0 and col14, rest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .? Actually row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So border R at leftmost and rightmost columns, interior empty. Row2 same. Row3 all R. Row4: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". Row5 same. Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row7 all O. Row8: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". Row9 same. Row10: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row11 same. Row12 all A. Row13: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A". Row14 all A. Observations: For each colored pixel, we create a horizontal band of that color covering entire row? Actually band height maybe 3 rows? For R: rows 0-5? Let's see: R appears rows 0-5 (0-5 inclusive). That's 6 rows. Input R at row3. The band seems to extend from top to just before O band? Actually O band occupies rows 6-9? O rows 6-9 (6-9 inclusive) that's 4 rows. Input O at row7. A band rows 10-14 (5 rows). Input A at row12. So rule: For each colored pixel, fill a horizontal band spanning entire width, with the color, covering a region determined by nearest other colored pixels above/below? The "storm's outer walls within that spark's zone carry its charge. The interior air stays dark. The top and bottom of the storm solidify if they fall within a zone." Metaphor: each spark altitude becomes a fully charged horizontal band. The storm's outer walls within that spark's zone carry its charge. The interior air stays dark. The top and bottom of the storm solidify if they fall within a zone. Interpretation: For each colored pixel, we create a band that extends vertically until reaching another colored pixel (or grid edge). The band's interior rows are filled with color across entire width? But interior rows are filled with color across entire width (full rows). The border rows (top and bottom of band) have color only at leftmost and rightmost columns (walls). The interior rows (between top and bottom) are empty (black). Wait for R band: top row (row0) is full R. bottom row of R band? Row5 is "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". That's border row? Actually row5 is not full, it's border. Row3 (where original pixel) is inside band? Row3 is full R (since row3 is middle). Row4 border? Row4 is border. So pattern: For each band, the topmost row is full color, bottommost row is full? Let's check O band: rows6-9. Row6 border? Row6 is "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O" (border). Row7 full O. Row8 border. Row9 border? Actually row9 is "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O". That's border. So bottommost row (row9) is border not full. So maybe topmost row of band is full only if it's the top of grid? Indeed R band top row is row0 (grid t ... [9834 chars truncated]
"Colored keystones are placed at various floors within a dark tower. Each keystone extends into a full load-bearing beam across the tower's width. Between beams, only the tower's outer walls carry the color of the nearest keystone — the rooms inside remain unlit, framed by the structural shell."
120b: k=1
See: A dark tower cross-section with colored stones placed at different floor levels.
Do: Each stone becomes a full horizontal beam at its floor. The tower's left and right walls between beams adopt the nearest stone's color. The top and ground floors, if within a zone, also become solid beams.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Scattered pixels become horizontal beams with colored wall-edges between them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 15x15 with scattered colored single pixels: R at (row3? actually zero-index?). Let's index rows 0-14. Input example1: R at row3 col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." that's row3 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands: top band all R across entire row0? Actually output row0: all R. Row1: R at col0 and col14, rest .? Wait output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So leftmost and rightmost columns become R, interior . . . So pattern: For each stone, we create a horizontal beam (full row) of that color across entire width? Not exactly: In output, there are multiple rows of R: rows0,1,2,3 are R? Let's list output rows (0-14): 0: R R R ... all R 1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 2: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 3: R R R ... all R 4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 5: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 7: O O O ... all O 8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 9: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 11: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 12: A A A ... all A 13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 14: A A A ... all A Observations: For each color, there is a block of rows: a top full row, then two rows with color at leftmost and rightmost columns, then a full row, then two rows with left/right, etc? Actually pattern seems like each stone creates a "zone" of 5 rows? Let's examine R stone at row3 col6. In output, rows0-5 are R zone. That's 6 rows (0-5). Within that zone, rows0 and 3 are full R rows, rows1,2,4,5 have R at leftmost and rightmost only. So pattern: For a given stone, we fill a vertical segment of rows from some start to some end, with horizontal beams at top and bottom of segment (full rows), and side walls (leftmost and rightmost columns) for interior rows. Similarly O stone at row7 col8 leads to rows6-9? Actually O zone rows6-9 (6,7,8,9). That's 4 rows. Row7 is full O, row6,8,9 have O at left/right? Row6 has O at left/right only, row7 full, row8 and 9 left/right only. Wait row9 also left/right only, no bottom full row? Actually row9 left/right only, row10 is A zone start. So O zone has top row6 left/right only, middle row7 full, bottom rows8-9 left/right only, no bottom full row. But in R zone, there were two full rows (top row0 and middle row3?) Actually top of R zone row0 full, middle row3 full, bottom row? row? after row5 there is O zone, so no bottom full row for R zone. So pattern maybe: For each stone, we create a "tower" where the stone's row becomes a full beam, and also the row directly above becomes full beam? Not exactly. Let's think of metaphor: "dark tower cross-section with colored stones placed at different floor levels. Each stone becomes a full horizontal beam at its floor. The tower's left and right walls between beams adopt the nearest stone's color. The top and ground floors, if within a zone, also become solid beams." Interpretation: We have vertical column (tower) wit ... [6110 chars truncated]
"Signal flares are launched at different heights over a dark battlefield. Each flare burns into a continuous tripwire of light across the field at its altitude. Between tripwires, only the fortified flanks — the leftmost and rightmost defensive positions — glow with the nearest flare's color, leaving the no-man's-land interior shrouded in darkness."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield with colored flares suspended at various elevations.
Do: Each flare's height becomes a solid defensive line across the full width. The flanks between lines carry the nearest flare's color. The perimeter edges of the entire field also fortify with the governing flare's color.
Grid: 15x15 grid divided into horizontal zones with solid tripwire lines and colored flank positions.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored cells (R, O, A). Output shows horizontal bands of solid color lines across full width at rows where there were colored cells? Let's examine. Input example1: colored cells at (row3? zero-index?) Let's index rows 0-14. Input shows R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output: rows 0-? Let's see output rows: Row0: all R Row1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row2: same as row1 Row3: all R Row4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R Row5: same Row6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row7: all O Row8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Row9: same as row8 Row10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row11: same Row12: all A Row13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A Row14: all A Observations: For each colored cell, there is a horizontal "solid line" of that color across full width at the row of the cell? Actually R cell at row3, output row3 is all R (solid). Also rows above and below? Row0 also all R, row1-2 have R at edges only. Row0 is topmost row, also all R. So seems that the "height" of flare becomes solid defensive line across full width: maybe each colored cell defines a "height" (row) and we fill that row with solid line of that color. Additionally, "flanks between lines carry the nearest flare's color." Means rows between solid lines are filled at leftmost and rightmost columns with nearest color? In output, rows between R solid line (row3) and O solid line (row7) have R at edges (col0 and col14) for rows4-5, then O at edges for rows6-9? Wait row6 is O at edges, row6 also has O at edges but not solid. Row6 is just above O solid line row7. Row6 edges O. Row8-9 edges O as well (between O solid line row7 and A solid line row12). Row10-11 edges A. So pattern: For each region between two solid lines, the rows have the color of the nearest solid line (maybe the one above? Actually rows4-5 are between R solid line row3 and O solid line row7. They have R at edges, not O. So they take the color of the nearest solid line above? Or nearest flare? "Flanks between lines carry the nearest flare's color." Could be nearest in vertical distance: rows4-5 are closer to R (distance 1-2) than O (distance 3-2). So they get R. Row6 is distance 1 from O, 3 from R, so O. Row8-9 are distance 1-2 from O, 3-4 from A, so O. Row10-11 are closer to A (distance 1-2) than O (distance 2-3), so A. So each row gets edge color of the nearest colored row (solid line). The solid lines themselves are at rows where original colored cells existed? In example, there were three colored cells at rows 3,7,12. Output solid lines at those rows (full width). Also topmost row0 is also solid R, even though no original R at row0. Why? Possibly because the "perimeter edges of the entire field also fortify with the governing flare's color." Means top and bottom edges become solid of the nearest flare's color? The top edge (row0) gets color of nearest flare (R at row3) across whole row. Bottom edge row14 gets color of nearest ... [4712 chars truncated]
"Spotlight operators are positioned at different heights in a dark theater rigging. Each operator sweeps a solid bar of light across the full width of the stage at their own level. Between their beams, only the wings — stage left and stage right — glow faintly with the nearest operator's gel color. The stage floor and fly-loft edges illuminate fully when they fall under an operator's domain."
120b: k=1
See: A dark stage house with isolated colored light sources at various heights.
Do: Each source creates a full horizontal wash at its height. The wing positions between washes carry the nearest source's color. Stage boundaries become full washes if within a source's territory.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Colored dots become horizontal light bars with wing-colored edges in between.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored single cells: R at (row4,col7?) Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14. Example1 input: R at row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bars: For each color, a full row of that color across entire width, but also some rows with that color only at edges? Let's examine output. Output rows (0-index): 0: R repeated across all columns. 1: R at col0 and col14, rest '.'? Actually row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So R at both ends, interior '.'. 2: same as row1. 3: full R row. 4: R at ends. 5: R at ends. 6: O at ends? Row6: "O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O" 7: full O row. 8: O at ends. 9: O at ends. 10: A at ends. 11: A at ends. 12: full A row. 13: A at ends. 14: full A row. So pattern: For each source color, we create a horizontal bar (full row) at the source's row? Let's see source rows: R at row3, O at row7, A at row12. Indeed full rows at those rows (row3,7,12) are all that color. Additionally, there are "wing" rows above and below each full bar, where the color appears only at the leftmost and rightmost columns (edges). The number of wing rows seems to extend outward until encountering another source's territory? Let's see: For R, source at row3. Wing rows above: rows0-2? Actually row0 is full R, not wing. Row1 and 2 are wing rows (edges). Row0 is also full R, maybe because it's top boundary within R's territory? Wait row0 is full R, but there is no source above. So maybe the rule: The region of influence of each source extends vertically until halfway to next source? Let's compute distances. Rows: R at 3, O at 7, A at 12. Distances: between R and O: 4 rows (rows3-7). The midpoint between 3 and7 is row5? Actually average (3+7)/2=5. So rows closer to R than O are rows <=5? Let's see: rows0-5 are R territory. Indeed rows0-5 output are R (full at row0? row0 full, rows1-2 edges, row3 full, rows4-5 edges). Row6 is O edges (since row6 is just above O's full row). So R territory includes rows0-5. Within that, the central row (source row) is full, the rows above and below within territory but not source become edge-only rows. At top boundary (row0) also full? maybe because it's the top edge of grid, considered as "stage boundary becomes full wash if within a source's territory". The description: "Stage boundaries become full washes if within a source's territory." So top boundary row0 is within R's territory, thus full R. Similarly bottom boundary row14 is within A's territory, thus full A. Now for O: source row7 full. Territory likely rows6-9? Since O's territory extends halfway to R above (row5.5) and halfway to A below (row9.5). So rows6-9 inclusive. Row6 edge, row7 full, row8 edge, row9 edge? Wait row9 is edge row (as output shows O at ends). Yes row9 edge. Row10 is A edges (since A territory starts at row10?). Actually A source at row12, territory rows10-14. Row10 edge, row11 edge, row12 full, row13 edge, row14 full (boundary). Indeed m ... [7679 chars truncated]
"Colored bulbs are buried at different depths in a dark flowerbed. Each bulb sends out roots that form a solid horizontal root mat at its planting depth. Between root mats, only the garden's border fence — the leftmost and rightmost columns of soil — shows the nearest bulb's color, as if the roots only trace the edges of the plot before turning inward."
120b: k=1
See: A dark soil cross-section with colored bulbs at various depths.
Do: Each bulb forms a full root mat across its depth. The garden border between mats shows the nearest bulb's color. The surface and bed-bottom also solidify if within a bulb's root zone.
Grid: 15x15. Colored dots become horizontal mats with colored border-edges between zones.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15 with some colored single cells: R at (row4,col7?) Let's index rows 0-14, cols 0-14. In example input: row3 (0-index) has R at col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." that's row3 col6 (0-index). O at row7 col8? line: ". . . . . . . . O . . . . . ." that's row7 col8. A at row12 col3. Output shows horizontal bands: top rows all R across entire row (row0-? Actually output first row all R). Then second row: R at first and last column, rest .? Wait output row1: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So border of R region. So region of R extends from row0 to row? Let's see output rows: rows0-? pattern: rows0-? full R rows, then rows with R border, then full R row again. Actually output rows0-? Let's list output rows with indices: 0: R R R ... all R 1: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 2: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 3: R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R 4: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 5: R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R 6: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 7: O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 8: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 9: O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 10: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 11: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 12: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 13: A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 14: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Observations: For each colored dot, we create a horizontal band (mat) of that color across its row? Actually R dot at row3 col6 leads to a band of R rows from row0 to row5? Let's see: R band occupies rows0-5? Actually rows0-5 have R in some pattern. Row0 full R, row1 border, row2 border, row3 full R, row4 border, row5 border. That's a 6-row tall region (rows0-5). The original R dot at row3 (middle) within that region. So region height maybe 6 rows centered on dot? Similarly O dot at row7 col8 leads to O region rows6-9? Actually O region rows6-9: row6 border O, row7 full O, row8 border O, row9 border O. That's 4 rows tall. A dot at row12 col3 leads to A region rows10-14? Actually rows10-14: row10 border A, row11 border A, row12 full A, row13 border A, row14 full A. That's 5 rows tall? Wait row14 full A. So region height maybe 5 rows? Let's examine pattern: For each color, the region extends from the dot's row up to the next colored region's border? Actually they are stacked vertically in order of appearance in input: R at row3, O at row7, A at row12. Output shows R region occupies rows0-5, O region rows6-9, A region rows10-14. So they partition the grid vertically, each region covering a contiguous block of rows. Within each region, the color fills entire rows at top and bottom of region? Actually pattern: For each region, the topmost row of region is full color, then next rows are border rows (color at first and last column), then middle row full color? Let's examine R region rows0-5: pattern: row0 full, rows1-2 border, row3 full, rows4-5 border. So pattern repeats: full, border, border, full, border, border? That's like alternating every two rows? Actually region heig ... [9420 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains black (.) background cells and non-black colored cells (which may include any combination of B, O, A, X, and possibly other colors). The non-black cells form connected components of same-colored cells using 4-connectivity (up, down, left, right — not diagonal). These components vary in size from single isolated cells to larger groups of 3 or more connected same-colored cells.
Do: 1. Identify every non-black cell in the grid and determine its color. 2. For each non-black cell, find the entire connected component it belongs to, where a connected component is defined as all cells of the same color reachable via 4-directional adjacency (up, down, left, right). 3. Count the number of cells in each connected component. 4. If a connected component has 3 or more cells, leave all its cells unchanged (they keep their original color). 5. If a connected component has fewer than 3 cells (i.e., size 1 or 2), replace every cell in that component with green (G). 6. All black (.) cells remain black.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background is black (.). The coordinate system is row-column with the origin at the top-left. There are no fixed size constraints — the grid can be any rectangular dimensions.
"Small tribes without enough members to survive are absorbed by the green forest."
120b: k=1
See: A dark landscape dotted with settlements of various colored tribes — blue villages, orange encampments, azure outposts, grey hermitages. Some tribes have gathered in strength, their people clustered tightly together along roads running north-south and east-west. Others are lonely — a single wanderer here, a pair of companions there, cut off from their kin.
Do: The green forest is always growing, always hungry. It respects strength in numbers — any tribe that has gathered at least three of its people together in an unbroken chain stands firm, their settlement walls holding back the encroaching woods. But the stragglers, the isolated outcasts and small pairs who couldn't find enough of their own kind to form a viable community, are swallowed by the forest. Their colors fade beneath the canopy, replaced by green. The darkness between settlements is too barren even for the forest — it remains untouched.
Grid: The landscape is a rectangular territory viewed from above, dark ground forming the empty wilderness between settlements. Tribe members touch only along the four cardinal roads — diagonal neighbors are strangers. The forest's green conquest replaces the lost, while the dark ground and the strong tribes remain exactly as they were.
We need to infer rule: From example, we have input and output. Let's map. Input grid (example1) size? Let's write rows: Row1: B O O B . A . X Row2: B O O B B . B . Row3: A A . . O O O O Row4: . B . . . . B B Row5: X . A . B . B B Output rows: Row1: G O O B . G . G Row2: G O O B B . G . Row3: G G . . O O O O Row4: . G . . . . B B Row5: G . G . G . B B We need to see which cells changed to G (green). Others unchanged. Identify groups of same color (non-green) that are at least size 3 in orthogonal connectivity. Those groups stay same; others become G? Let's test. Look at input: color B (blue). Where are B cells? Coordinates (row,col) 1-index. Row1 col1 B, col4 B. Row2 col1 B, col4 B, col5 B, col7 B. Row4 col2 B, col7 B, col8 B. Row5 col5 B, col7 B, col8 B. Also B at row5 col? row5 col1 X not B. Now connectivity: Let's see clusters. Cluster1: B at (1,1) adjacent to (2,1) vertically => cluster includes (1,1),(2,1). Also (2,1) adjacent to (2,2) O not B. (2,1) adjacent to (3,1) A not B. So cluster size 2. Cluster2: B at (1,4) adjacent to (2,4) B, (2,5) B adjacent to (2,4) horizontally, also (2,5) adjacent to (3,5) O not B. Also (2,4) adjacent to (2,5) and (3,4) . not B. So cluster includes (1,4),(2,4),(2,5) size 3. Cluster3: B at (2,7) adjacent to (3,7) O not B, (2,8) . not B, (1,7) . not B, (3,7) O. So isolated size1. Cluster4: B at (4,2) adjacent to (5,2) . not B, (4,1) . not B, (3,2) A not B, (4,3) . not B. size1. Cluster5: B at (4,7) adjacent to (4,8) B, (5,7) B, (3,7) O, (4,6) . So cluster includes (4,7),(4,8),(5,7),(5,8) also (5,5) B? Wait (5,5) B adjacent to (5,7) not directly (col6 is .). So not connected. So cluster size 4. Cluster6: B at (5,5) isolated? Adjacent (4,5) . , (5,4) . , (5,6) . , (6,5) none (grid only 5 rows). So size1. Thus clusters of size >=3: cluster2 (size3) and cluster5 (size4). According to description, those stay same (remain B). Others become G (green). Let's see output: positions that were B and became G? Check output row1 col1: G (was B) yes cluster1 size2 -> turned G. Row2 col1: G (was B) yes. Row2 col7: G (was B) yes cluster3 size1 -> G. Row4 col2: G (was B) yes cluster4 size1 -> G. Row5 col5: G (was B) yes cluster6 size1 -> G. Also row5 col1? was X unchanged? Output row5 col1 G? Wait output row5 col1 is G (input X). Actually input row5 col1 is X (grey). Output row5 col1 G. So not only B changed. Also row1 col8 X became G. Row2 col8 . unchanged? output row2 col8 . (same). Row3 col1 A became G? Input row3 col1 A, output row3 col1 G. Row3 col2 A became G. Row5 col3 A became G. So many non-B turned to G. Thus rule not just about B clusters. Maybe any color that does NOT belong to a cluster of size >=3 becomes G, regardless of original color. Let's test: Colors present: O (orange), A (azure), X (grey), . (black). Check clusters for each color. We need to find clusters of each color (excluding green). If a cluster size >=3, keep original colors; else turn to G. Let's test O clus ... [7770 chars truncated]
"Cells that fail to reach a viable colony size undergo apoptosis and are replaced by green fluorescent markers, while thriving colonies maintain their original phenotype."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A petri dish of colored cell colonies on a dark growth medium. Each colony is a cluster of same-colored organisms connected by cardinal contact.
Do: Colonies too small to sustain themselves — fewer than three organisms — trigger programmed cell death and glow green under the microscope. Larger colonies survive unchanged.
Grid: Same dimensions. Dark medium remains. Colonies of 3+ connected same-colored cells persist; smaller clusters turn green.
"Lone stars and binary pairs lack the gravitational pull to resist the green nebula's expansion. Only star clusters of three or more maintain their spectral signature."
120b: k=1
See: A dark void with colored stars. Same-colored stars adjacent in cardinal directions form clusters.
Do: Clusters too small to resist — one or two stars — are absorbed into the green nebula. Clusters of three or more burn bright in their original spectral color.
Grid: Same void dimensions. Dark space unchanged. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ keep their color; groups of 1-2 turn green.
We need to infer rule: clusters of same color (non-black?) of size 1 or 2 become green (G). Clusters size >=3 stay same. Black '.' unchanged. Need to consider all colors: B, O, A, X, etc. In example, let's verify. Input example 1 grid 5 rows? Let's write coordinates. Input: Row1: B O O B . A . X Row2: B O O B B . B . Row3: A A . . O O O O Row4: . B . . . . B B Row5: X . A . B . B B Output: Row1: G O O B . G . G Row2: G O O B B . G . Row3: G G . . O O O O Row4: . G . . . . B B Row5: G . G . G . B B Now analyze clusters per color. Color B: positions: (1,1) B; (1,4) B; (2,1) B; (2,4) B; (2,5) B; (2,7) B; (4,2) B; (4,7) B; (4,8) B; (5,5) B; (5,7) B; (5,8) B. Need to see connectivity cardinal (up/down/left/right). Let's map. Coordinates (row,col). Let's see clusters: Cluster A: (1,1) adjacent to (2,1) vertically => size at least 2. Also (2,1) adjacent to (2,2?) no B. (1,1) also adjacent to (1,2) O not B. So cluster of B at (1,1)-(2,1) size 2. In output those become G? Indeed output row1 col1 G, row2 col1 G. Yes. Cluster B: (1,4) adjacent to (2,4) vertically => size 2. Output row1 col4 B stays B? Wait output row1 col4 B unchanged. Actually output row1 col4 B (same). So rule not just size 2 become G. Let's examine: maybe clusters of size exactly 2 become green only if they are isolated from other same color? But (1,4)-(2,4) is size 2 but remained B. Why? Maybe because there is also (2,5) B adjacent to (2,4) horizontally? Yes (2,5) B adjacent to (2,4). So cluster includes (1,4),(2,4),(2,5) => size 3. Also (5,5) B not connected. So cluster size >=3 stays B. Indeed (1,4)-(2,4)-(2,5) size 3 => stays B. Check other B cluster: (2,7) B adjacent to (4,7)? Not directly (row3 col7 O). So maybe separate. (4,7) B adjacent to (4,8) B and (5,7) B and (5,8) B. Also (5,7) adjacent to (5,8). So cluster includes (4,7),(4,8),(5,7),(5,8) size 4 => stays B. Output shows those remain B. (4,2) B adjacent to (5,2) .? No. Adjacent to (3,2) A? No. So isolated size1 => becomes G? Output row4 col2 G yes. (5,5) B isolated? Adjacent up (4,5) .; left (5,4) .; right (5,6) .; down none. So size1 => becomes G. Output row5 col5 G yes. Thus rule: For each color (excluding black '.'), find connected components via orthogonal adjacency. If component size is 1 or 2, change all cells in that component to green G. If size >=3, keep original color. Now need to consider other colors: O, A, X etc. Let's verify. Color O positions: (1,2),(1,3),(2,2),(2,3) cluster size 4 => stays O. Output O unchanged. Also O cluster at row3 col5-8 (four O) size 4 stays O. Also O at row5 col1 X? Wait row5 col1 X not O. So fine. Color A: positions (1,6) A; (3,1) A; (3,2) A; (5,3) A. Need connectivity: (3,1)-(3,2) adjacent => cluster size2 => should become G. Output row3 col1 G, row3 col2 G yes. (1,6) A isolated size1 => becomes G row1 col6 G yes. (5,3) A isolated size1 => becomes G row5 col3 G yes. Color X: positions (1,8) X; (5,1) X. Are they adjacent? N ... [7045 chars truncated]
"Small rafts of one or two lashed boats capsize in the green algal tide. Only flotillas of three or more vessels linked gunwale-to-gunwale sail through with their flags flying."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark ocean with colored vessels. Same-colored vessels moored side-by-side in cardinal directions form flotillas.
Do: Flotillas of fewer than three vessels are swallowed by the green tide and lose their colors. Flotillas of three or more keep their original flag colors.
Grid: Same ocean dimensions. Open water stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ unchanged; groups of 1-2 become green.
"Components with insufficient connections to form a viable subcircuit short out and emit a green fault signal. Only clusters of three or more linked components maintain their rated voltage color."
120b: k=1
See: A dark circuit board with colored components. Same-colored components connected along cardinal traces form subcircuits.
Do: Subcircuits of fewer than three connected components fault out and display green. Subcircuits of three or more operate normally in their original color.
Grid: Same board dimensions. Empty board stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ remain; groups of 1-2 turn green.
We need to infer rule: groups of same color connected orthogonally (cardinal). If group size <3, turn to green (G). Else keep original color. Black '.' stays black? In example, '.' remained '.' unless turned green? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 5 rows? Let's write coordinates. Input: Row0: B O O B . A . X Row1: B O O B B . B . Row2: A A . . O O O O Row3: . B . . . . B B Row4: X . A . B . B B Output: Row0: G O O B . G . G Row1: G O O B B . G . Row2: G G . . O O O O Row3: . G . . . . B B Row4: G . G . G . B B Now compare groups. Identify groups of each color. Color B: positions: (0,0), (0,3), (1,0), (1,3), (1,4), (1,6), (3,1), (3,6), (3,7), (4,4), (4,6), (4,7) Check connectivity orthogonal. Let's map adjacency. Group1: (0,0) adjacent to (1,0) => same group. (1,0) adjacent to (0,0) and (1,1?) but that's O. Also (2,0) is A. So group includes (0,0),(1,0). Also (0,3) not adjacent (distance). (1,3) adjacent to (0,3) and (1,4) and (2,3) '.' etc. So separate group. Group2: (0,3),(1,3),(1,4) connected. Also (3,6),(3,7),(4,6),(4,7) maybe connected via (2,6) O etc not. So separate. Group3: (3,1) alone? Adjacent to (2,1) A, (4,1) '.' etc. So isolated. Group4: (3,6),(3,7),(4,6),(4,7) connected as a 2x2 block. Group5: (4,4) isolated. Now output: B's that remain B: at (0,3) stays B, (1,3) B, (1,4) B, (3,6) B, (3,7) B, (4,6) B, (4,7) B. So group2 and group4 remain B (size >=3). Group1 (size2) turned to G at (0,0) and (1,0) -> output G. Group3 (size1) turned G at (3,1). Group5 (size1) turned G at (4,4). Indeed matches rule. Now check other colors. Color O: positions: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(1,2),(2,4),(2,5),(2,6),(2,7). Also maybe others? That's all. Connectivity: (0,1)-(0,2) adjacent, also (1,1) below (0,1) etc. So they form a big group of size? Let's count: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(1,2) = 4. Also (2,4-7) are separate? They are adjacent horizontally: (2,4)-(2,5)-(2,6)-(2,7) = 4. Are they connected to upper O's via vertical? (1,2) above (2,2) which is '.'; (1,1) above (2,1) A. So separate groups. So two groups each size 4. In output, O's remain O unchanged. Indeed. Color A: positions: (0,5), (2,0),(2,1),(4,2). Also maybe others? (0,5) isolated? Adjacent to (1,5) '.'; (0,4) '.'; (0,6) '.'; ( - ) So isolated size1 -> turned G at (0,5) output G. (2,0),(2,1) adjacent -> group size2 -> turned G at both (2,0),(2,1) output G. (4,2) isolated -> turned G at (4,2) output G. Indeed. Color X: positions: (0,7),(4,0). Also maybe others? (0,7) isolated -> output G at (0,7). (4,0) isolated -> output G at (4,0). Indeed. Thus rule confirmed. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid 8 rows? Let's list rows with indices. Row0: ". X . B X X . X" Row1: "B B . . . B B ." Row2: ". O O . . . . X" Row3: "B B . X . B . ." Row4: ". B . X X X . B" Row5: ". O . . O . . O" Row6: "B . B . . . B O" Row7: ". . B B . B . O" Let's map coordinates (r,c). We'll need to find connected components for each color (excluding black '.' which stays). For each col ... [6705 chars truncated]
"Spirits wandering alone or in pairs are too weak to resist the enchantment of the green fae, who claims them. Only gatherings of three or more kindred spirits hold their true essence."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark realm with colored spirits. Same-colored spirits adjacent in cardinal directions form kindred gatherings.
Do: Gatherings of fewer than three spirits are enchanted by the green fae and transformed. Gatherings of three or more resist and keep their original essence.
Grid: Same realm dimensions. Void stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ unchanged; groups of 1-2 become green.
"Dancers without a troupe of at least three are pulled offstage and given green ribbons — marked as understudies. Only formations of three or more linked dancers keep their performance sashes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with colored dancers. Same-colored dancers touching in cardinal directions form troupes.
Do: Troupes of fewer than three dancers are benched and marked with green ribbons. Troupes of three or more perform in their original colors.
Grid: Same stage dimensions. Empty floor stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ keep color; groups of 1-2 become green.
"Mineral deposits too small to mine — just a crystal or two — oxidize to green copper patina under exposure. Only veins of three or more connected crystals retain their native luster."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark rock face with colored mineral deposits. Same-colored crystals adjacent in cardinal directions form veins.
Do: Veins of fewer than three crystals oxidize and turn green. Veins of three or more crystals are stable and keep their original mineral color.
Grid: Same rock face dimensions. Dark matrix stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ unchanged; groups of 1-2 turn green.
"Ingredients scattered too thinly across the pan never caramelize — they just turn green and bitter. Only clusters thick enough to hold their own heat develop their true flavor."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark cooking surface dotted with colored ingredients. Same-colored pieces touching edge-to-edge form groups of varying sizes.
Do: Any group of ingredients too sparse to retain heat — fewer than three touching pieces — overcooks into a green char. Generous clusters keep their original color and flavor.
Grid: Same grid size. Black background unchanged. Connected groups of 3+ same-colored cells stay; groups of 1-2 turn green.
"Solo performers and duets lack the resonance to hold their tone in the concert hall — their sound shifts to a strange green frequency. Only ensembles of three or more sustain their true pitch."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark concert hall where colored notes hang in the air. Notes of the same color adjacent in the four cardinal directions form ensembles.
Do: Ensembles too small to resonate — just one or two notes — lose their original timbre and shift to a green overtone. Larger ensembles ring true.
Grid: Same dimensions. Silence (black) remains. Groups of 3+ connected same-colored notes keep their color; smaller groups become green.
"Teams fielding fewer than three players forfeit and wear the green jersey of elimination. Only squads with enough players to compete keep their original colors."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark playing field with colored players. Players of the same color standing in adjacent cardinal positions form a team.
Do: Teams with fewer than three connected players are disqualified and forced into green elimination jerseys. Teams of three or more play on in their true colors.
Grid: Same grid. Empty field stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ remain; groups of 1-2 become green.
"Wisps of cloud too thin to hold their hue are bleached green by the aurora's light. Only storm systems with enough mass keep their original color against the night sky."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky with colored cloud formations. Same-colored clouds touching along cardinal edges form weather systems of different sizes.
Do: Weather systems too small — just a wisp or pair of clouds — are overwhelmed by the green aurora and change color. Larger systems resist and maintain their original hue.
Grid: Same sky dimensions. Black sky persists. Connected cloud groups of 3+ keep color; groups of 1-2 turn green.
"Buildings standing alone or in pairs lack the zoning density to avoid the city's green-space reclamation program. Only blocks of three or more connected structures are granted preservation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark city map with colored buildings. Same-colored buildings sharing walls along cardinal directions form blocks.
Do: Blocks with fewer than three buildings are demolished and converted to green park space. Blocks of three or more are historically preserved in their original color.
Grid: Same map dimensions. Empty lots stay black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ persist; smaller groups become green.
"Scouts and small patrols caught behind enemy lines are captured and repainted in the enemy's green. Only battalions of three or more hold their ground and fly their true banner."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark battlefield with colored units. Same-colored units in adjacent cardinal positions form battalions.
Do: Battalions too small to defend themselves — one or two units — are overrun and converted to the enemy's green. Larger formations hold their colors.
Grid: Same battlefield. Empty ground remains black. Connected groups of 3+ same-colored units stay; groups of 1-2 turn green.
"Actors who can't fill a scene — soloists and duos — are draped in green cloaks by the stage manager, signaling they've lost their role. Only casts of three or more keep their costumes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with costumed performers in various colors. Performers of the same costume color touching in cardinal directions form a cast.
Do: Casts too small to carry a scene — fewer than three — lose their costumes to green cloaks. Full casts of three or more perform in their original attire.
Grid: Same stage dimensions. Dark backdrop stays. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ unchanged; groups of 1-2 become green.
"Flowers planted in isolation or lonely pairs are overtaken by green moss. Only flower beds dense enough — three blooms or more touching — resist the creeping ground cover."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark garden bed with colored flowers. Same-colored flowers adjacent in cardinal directions form flower beds.
Do: Flower beds with fewer than three connected blooms are smothered by green moss. Beds of three or more blooms thrive and keep their original color.
Grid: Same garden dimensions. Bare soil stays black. Connected same-colored groups of 3+ remain; groups of 1-2 become green.
See: The input is an 11x11 grid with a black background. Scattered across the grid are several grey (X) cells and several colored (non-black, non-grey) cells. Each colored cell is spatially close to exactly one X cell. The X cells act as anchor points, and each has one or more colored cells nearby (within one step in row and/or column). Together, the colored cells and X cells encode fragments of a single 3x3 pattern.
Do: 1. Identify all X cells in the input grid. These are anchor points representing the center cell (row 1, column 1) of a shared 3x3 output grid. 2. Initialize a 3x3 output grid filled with black (.) and place X at position (1,1) — the center. 3. For each colored cell (any color other than black or grey), find the nearest X cell (by Manhattan distance or Euclidean distance — each colored cell will be unambiguously closest to exactly one X). 4. Compute the row and column offset of the colored cell relative to its nearest X: (delta_row, delta_col) = (colored_row - X_row, colored_col - X_col). 5. Map the offset to the 3x3 output grid by adding it to the center position: output position = (1 + delta_row, 1 + delta_col). 6. Write the colored cell's color into that output position. 7. Repeat for all colored cells. The result is the completed 3x3 output grid.
Grid: The input grid is 11x11 with a black (.) background. The output grid is always 3x3. The center cell of the output is always X (grey). Each offset from an anchor X falls within the range [-1, +1] in both row and column, so all fragments map into valid positions within the 3x3 output. No two colored cells map to the same output position.
"Archaeologists piece together a shattered mosaic from fragments found near buried survey stakes."
120b: k=2
See: Across a dark excavation site, several grey survey stakes have been driven into the earth. Around each stake, colored mosaic fragments lie half-buried in the soil — each shard resting just a step or two from its stake, as though a single mosaic tile was smashed and its pieces scattered to different corners of the dig site, each piece coming to rest near a different stake.
Do: The archaeologists realize every stake marks the same center point of the original mosaic — each stake is a ghost of the same heart-stone. The colored shards near each stake remember where they sat relative to that center. Gather every shard, note how it leans from its stake — above, below, left, right, diagonal — and lay it back into its rightful place around a single restored heart-stone. When every fragment has come home, the mosaic is whole again.
Grid: The dig site is a wide dark field. The restored mosaic is a small 3×3 tile with the grey heart-stone always at its center. Every shard nestles within one step of the center — no fragment was flung farther than arm's reach. No two shards compete for the same seat in the mosaic.
We need to infer rule. From description: stakes are grey (X) representing center of each 3x3 mosaic? Actually grey heart-stone always at center. In examples, output is 3x3 grid with center being X? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 11x11. Output: M R R O X O G G G So output 3x3. Center is X (grey). So X is the stake (center). The other colors are placed relative to X based on their positions relative to any X in input? There may be multiple X's in input, each representing a stake (center). The colored shards near each stake are within one step (Manhattan? Chebyshev distance <=1). They are placed accordingly in output mosaic. In Example1 input, locate X's. Let's map coordinates (row, col). I'll index rows 0-10, cols 0-10. Rows: 0 all . 1 all . 2: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) 3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) 4 all . 5 all . 6 all . 7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) 8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) 9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) 10 all . So there are multiple X's: at (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). The description says each stake marks same center point of original mosaic — each stake is a ghost of same heart-stone. So we need to combine fragments from all stakes into one mosaic. We need to collect colored fragments that are within one step of any X (including diagonals). For each such fragment, note its relative position to its X (dx,dy). Then place that color at same relative position around a single central X in output. But there may be multiple X's with overlapping relative positions; but rule says no two shards compete for same seat, so they are consistent. Let's test: For each X, look at neighboring cells (8 directions). Gather colors. Take X at (3,2). Its neighbors: (2,1)=M (up-left) => relative (-1,-1) => top-left of mosaic => output top-left should be M. Indeed output top-left is M. (2,2)=. (up) (2,3)=. (up-right) (3,1)=. (left) (3,3)=. (right) (4,1)=. (down-left) (4,2)=. (down) (4,3)=. (down-right) So only M. X at (3,5). Neighbors: (2,4)=. (up-left) (2,5)=. (up) (2,6)=. (up-right) (3,4)=O (left) => relative (0,-1) => middle-left => output middle-left should be O. Indeed output middle-left is O. (3,6)=O (right) => middle-right => output middle-right O. Yes. (4,4)=. (down-left) (4,5)=. (down) (4,6)=. (down-right) X at (7,7). Neighbors: (6,6)=. (up-left) (6,7)=. (up) (6,8)=. (up-right) (7,6)=. (left) (7,8)=. (right) (8,6)=G (down-left) => relative (+1,-1) => bottom-left => output bottom-left G. Indeed output bottom-left G. (8,7)=G (down) => bottom middle => output bottom middle G. Yes. (8,8)=G (down-right) => bottom-right G. Yes. X at (9,2). Neighbors: (8,1)=. (up-left) (8,2)=R (up) => relative (-1,0) => top middle? Wait relative to X at (9,2): up is (8,2) => that's top middle of mosaic => output top middle should be R. Indeed output top middle is R. ... [6119 chars truncated]
"Scattered cells carry genetic memories of a single organism they once formed. Each drifts near a nucleus remnant, remembering only its relative position in the body plan."
120b: fail
See: A dark petri dish holds several grey nucleus remnants and colorful wandering cells, each cell orbiting close to one nucleus.
Do: Each cell recalls where it sat relative to its nucleus. Reconstruct the original organism by letting every cell snap back to its remembered position around a single shared nucleus.
Grid: The petri dish is an 11x11 dark field. The organism is a 3x3 body plan with a grey nucleus at its core.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 11x11 input, output is 3x3 grid (maybe extracted region). The description: "organism is a 3x3 body plan with a grey nucleus at its core." So output is 3x3 with center being grey X? In example1 output: M R R O X O G G G Center is X (grey). Indeed. In input example1, there is a cluster of colored cells around a grey nucleus? Let's examine input1 coordinates. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input1 grid: Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2: col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 'M' col3 '.'... Row3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." So row3 col2 X, col4 O, col5 X, col6 O. Row4 all . Row5 all . Row6 all . Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." Row10 all . We need to find a 3x3 pattern with center X that includes other colors relative positions. Look at the cluster: maybe there are multiple X's (grey) representing nucleus remnants. In description: "dark petri dish holds several grey nucleus remnants and colorful wandering cells, each cell orbiting close to one nucleus." So there are multiple X's (grey) each with surrounding colored cells that were originally around a single nucleus. The task: "Each cell recalls where it sat relative to its nucleus. Reconstruct the original organism by letting every cell snap back to its remembered position around a single shared nucleus." Thus we need to take all colored cells that are adjacent (maybe orthogonal or diagonal) to any X, and map them to positions relative to a central X (the nucleus). The output is the 3x3 arrangement of colors around a central X, where each colored cell's relative offset from its original X is preserved, but we overlay all onto a single nucleus. So we need to collect all colored cells that are adjacent (maybe within Manhattan distance 1?) to any X, and map them onto a 3x3 grid centered at (0,0). If multiple cells map to same relative position, maybe they stack? In example1, let's compute. Find all X positions: - (3,2) - (3,5) - (7,7) - (9,2) Also maybe others? That's it. Now for each colored cell (non '.' and not X) we compute its offset relative to the nearest X? Or relative to the X it is orbiting (closest). The description: each cell orbits close to one nucleus. So each colored cell is adjacent to a particular X (maybe orthogonal or diagonal). Let's list colored cells and their adjacency. List colored cells: M at (2,2). Adjacent to X at (3,2) (down one). So offset from X: (-1,0) (i.e., cell is above X). So relative position (row offset -1, col 0) corresponds to top middle of 3x3. O at (3,4) and (3,6). X at (3,5) is between them. Offsets: O at (3,4) offset (0,-1) left of X. O at (3,6) offset (0,+1) right of X. R at (8,2) and (8,3). X at (9,2) is below them? Actually X at (9,2) is one row below (8,2). Offsets: R at (8,2) offset (-1,0) (above X). R at (8,3) offset (-1,1) (above and right). Also there is X at (9,2) maybe also adjacent to R at (8,3) diagonal? That's offset (-1,1). Good. G at (8,6),(8 ... [10481 chars truncated]
"Fragments of a shattered constellation drift through the void, each still gravitationally tethered to the nearest dead star."
120b: k=2
See: A dark sky with several grey dead stars and colorful stellar fragments, each fragment orbiting near one star.
Do: Measure each fragment's displacement from its anchor star. Collapse all stars to a single point and the fragments reassemble the lost constellation.
Grid: The sky is 11x11 dark void. The constellation is a 3x3 star map with a grey anchor at center.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 11x11 input, output is 3x3 grid (maybe extracted region). The description: dark sky 11x11, constellation 3x3 star map with grey anchor at center. The anchor is grey (X). The fragments are colored cells around anchor. The rule: measure each fragment's displacement from its anchor star, collapse all stars to a single point and fragments reassemble lost constellation. So we need to find anchor X (grey) in input? In example1, output is: M R R O X O G G G So output includes X at center. Input example1: Let's locate X's. Input grid (I'll index rows 0-10). Provided: Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) Row3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) Row4: all . Row5: all . Row6: all . Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) Row10: all . There are multiple X's (grey). The anchor is maybe the central X of the constellation? In output, X is at center (position (1,1) of 3x3). Which X from input corresponds? Possibly the X that has colored fragments around it (M, O, R, G). Let's see distances: In output, arrangement: M at (0,0) relative to X (center). O at (0,1) and (0,2?) Wait output grid: Row0: M R R Row1: O X O Row2: G G G So relative positions: M is up-left of X; R are up-right? Actually coordinates: center (1,1). M at (0,0) offset (-1,-1). R at (0,1) offset (-1,0) and (0,2) offset (-1,1). O at (1,0) offset (0,-1) and (1,2) offset (0,1). G at (2,0),(2,1),(2,2) offset (1,-1),(1,0),(1,1). Thus pattern: a 3x3 block with colors arranged maybe based on original positions relative to some anchor X. Now find in input a configuration where relative positions of colored cells to a particular X match these offsets (maybe after translation). Let's examine each X. Consider X at (3,2). What colored cells around it? At (2,1) M is up-left (-1,-1) relative to X. At (3,4) O is same row, col+2 (offset 0,+2) not matching. At (3,5) X another anchor. At (3,6) O offset (0,+4). At (7,7) X far away. At (9,2) X. But also R at (8,2) is offset (+5,0) from (3,2). Not matching. Maybe the rule: take all colored cells (non-grey) and map them relative to the nearest X? Or collapse all X's to a single point (the anchor) and keep relative positions of other colors to that anchor, then output bounding box of those colors? The description: "Collapse all stars to a single point and the fragments reassemble the lost constellation." So we treat each X as a star; we move them all to same location (the anchor). The fragments (colored cells) keep their displacement vectors from their original X (anchor star). When we collapse all X's to same point, fragments from different stars may overlap, forming a combined pattern. Then we output the minimal bounding rectangle containing all fragments (maybe 3x3). Let's test. In example1, there are three ... [8122 chars truncated]
"Flotsam from a wrecked vessel drifts near several channel buoys. Each piece of wreckage remembers its position on the ship relative to the mast it was lashed to."
120b: k=1
See: A dark ocean with several grey buoys and colorful pieces of flotsam, each drifting near one buoy.
Do: Each piece's offset from its buoy reveals where it sat on the original vessel. Reassemble all pieces around a single mast to rebuild the ship's cross-section.
Grid: The ocean is 11x11 dark water. The ship's cross-section is a 3x3 layout with a grey mast at center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 11x11 with many colors, output is 3x3 cross-section. In example 1, output grid is: M R R O X O G G G We need to see how these correspond to pieces near buoys (grey buoys maybe X?). In input, there are grey X cells and colored pieces near them. The description: "Each piece's offset from its buoy reveals where it sat on the original vessel. Reassemble all pieces around a single mast to rebuild the ship's cross-section." So we have multiple buoys (grey X) each with colored pieces around them (maybe O, M, G, R). Offsets relative to each X indicate original positions relative to central mast (maybe also X?). The central mast is grey at center of 3x3 output (X). So we need to collect all colored cells that are adjacent to X buoys, compute their offset vectors from the X, then map those offsets onto a single central X (mast) to produce output. In example, let's locate X cells in input. Input grid (I'll index rows 0-10, cols 0-10). Let's list coordinates with X: Row3 (0-index?) Actually row numbers: Let's write rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . M . . . . . . . . . 3: . . X . O X O . . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . X . . . 8: . . R R . . G G G . . 9: . . X . . . . . . . . 10: . . . . . . . . . . . Coordinates (row,col): - X at (3,2) - X at (3,5) - X at (7,7) - X at (9,2) Also maybe other X? That's it. Now colored pieces near each X: Let's see around each X. First X (3,2). Adjacent cells (including diagonals?) The description "offset from its buoy reveals where it sat on the original vessel." Likely relative positions of colored cells to the X indicate where they belong in final 3x3. So we need to collect colored cells that are within some radius? In example, output includes colors M,R,R,O,X,O,G,G,G. The central X is the mast. So we need to map colors to positions relative to central X. Let's compute offsets of colored cells relative to each X. For X at (3,2): - M at (2,1) is offset (-1,-1) relative to X. - O at (3,4) offset (0,2) relative to X. - O at (3,6) offset (0,4) relative to X? Wait (3,6) is O, offset (0,4). That's far. - Also maybe other colors near? Not. For X at (3,5): - O at (3,4) offset (0,-1) - O at (3,6) offset (0,1) - maybe others. For X at (7,7): - No colored around? Actually none. For X at (9,2): - R at (8,2) offset (-1,0) - R at (8,3) offset (-1,1) - G at (8,5) offset (-1,3) - G at (8,6) offset (-1,4) - G at (8,7) offset (-1,5) But output only 3x3, so offsets beyond -1..1 maybe not used. So maybe we only consider immediate 8-neighbor cells (distance 1). Let's check. Neighbors of X (3,2): cells at (2,1) M, (2,2) ., (2,3) ., (3,1) ., (3,3) ., (4,1) ., (4,2) ., (4,3) . So only M at (-1,-1). That maps to output position top-left maybe M. Neighbors of X (3,5): cells: (2,4) ., (2,5). ., (2,6). ., (3,4) O, (3,6) O, (4,4). ., (4,5). ., (4,6). . So O at left and right of X. That would map to outp ... [5956 chars truncated]
"Components were desoldered from a circuit board and scattered—each landed near one of several identical test pads on the workbench."
120b: k=1
See: A dark workbench with several grey test pads and colorful components, each component resting near one pad.
Do: Each component's offset from its nearest pad matches its pin assignment on the original chip. Place all components at their offsets around a single pad to reconstruct the chip layout.
Grid: The workbench is 11x11 dark surface. The chip is a 3x3 layout with a grey pad at center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 11x11 with many colors, output is 3x3 grid containing certain colors arranged. The description: grey pad at center (X?) In example, output shows a 3x3 chip layout with a grey pad at center? In output of example: M R R O X O G G G Here X is grey pad at center (row2 col2). So output is 3x3 with center X. The other colors are placed relative to that pad according to offsets from nearest pad in input. In input example, there are multiple grey test pads (X) and components (colored). Each component's offset from its nearest pad matches its pin assignment on original chip. So we need to find a single pad (maybe the central pad) and map components relative to it. Thus algorithm: Find all X cells in input. For each colored cell (non '.' and not X), find the nearest X (Manhattan? Euclidean?) and compute offset vector (dx,dy) from that X to the colored cell. Then place that colored cell at same offset relative to a chosen central pad (maybe the central X of the chip). The output grid is just the 3x3 region containing the central pad and its surrounding components (offsets within -1..1?). In example, offsets likely within one cell distance (adjacent). Let's test. Example input: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. I'll list X positions: In example input lines: Row3 (0-index) line: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => positions: col2 X, col5 X. Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => row7 col7 X. Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => no X. Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => row9 col2 X. Also maybe other X? Row0-2 none. Row5-6 none. So X positions: (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). Also maybe more? That's it. Now colored cells: M at (2,1). O at (3,4) and (3,6). R at (8,2),(8,3). G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8). Also maybe others. Now for each colored cell, find nearest X (Manhattan distance). Compute offset. Let's compute: M (2,1). Distances to Xs: to (3,2): |2-3|+|1-2|=2 to (3,5): |2-3|+|1-5|=5 to (7,7): 11 to (9,2): 8 Nearest is (3,2) with offset = (2-3,1-2)=(-1,-1). So relative position up-left of pad. In output, M appears at top-left corner (row0 col0) relative to X at center (row1 col1). Indeed offset (-1,-1). Good. Now O at (3,4). Distances: to (3,2)=2, to (3,5)=1, to (7,7)=7, to (9,2)=7. Nearest is (3,5) offset (0,-1) (since col4 - col5 = -1). So O is left of pad. In output, O appears at (1,0) left of X. Yes. O at (3,6). Distances: to (3,5)=1 offset (0,1) right of pad. Output O at (1,2) right of X. Yes. R at (8,2). Distances: to (9,2)=1 offset (-1,0) above pad. Output R at (0,1) above X. Yes. R at (8,3). Distances: to (9,2)=|8-9|+|3-2|=2, to (7,7)=5, to (3,5)=... etc nearest (9,2) offset (-1,1). That's up-right. Output R at (0,2) top-right. Yes. G at (8,6). Distances: to (7,7)=|8-7|+|6-7|=2 offset (1,-1) down-left. Output G at (2,0) bottom-left. Yes. G at (8,7). nearest (7,7) offset (1,0) down. Output G at (2,1) bottom center. Yes. G at (8,8). nearest (7,7) offset (1,1) down-right. Output G at (2,2). Yes. Thus r ... [5371 chars truncated]
"An oracle's prophecy was split among shrines—each shrine holds colored rune stones arranged around a sacred grey altar stone, and only by uniting the shrines does the full prophecy appear."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark temple floor with several grey altar stones and colorful rune stones, each rune placed near one altar.
Do: Each rune's position relative to its altar encodes one glyph of the prophecy. Merge all altars into one to read the complete oracle.
Grid: The temple is 11x11 dark stone. The prophecy tablet is a 3x3 grid with a grey altar at center.
"Dancers freeze mid-routine, each poised near a spotlight on the floor. Their positions relative to their spotlights encode the choreographer's secret formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark dance floor with several grey spotlights and colorful dancers, each frozen near one spotlight.
Do: Note each dancer's offset from their spotlight. Slide all spotlights together and the dancers lock into the hidden formation.
Grid: The floor is 11x11 dark surface. The formation is a 3x3 pattern with a grey spotlight at center.
"Mineral veins fractured during a quake, each colored crystal displaced from its magma chamber core but still nearby—the original geode can be reconstructed from the scatter pattern."
120b: k=3
See: A dark rock face with several grey magma chamber cores and colorful mineral crystals, each crystal lodged near one core.
Do: Measure each crystal's displacement from its nearest core. Overlay all displacements onto a single core to reconstruct the original geode cross-section.
Grid: The rock face is 11x11 dark stone. The geode is a 3x3 cross-section with a grey core at center.
We need to infer rule. From description: dark rock face 11x11 black '.'; geode 3x3 cross-section with grey core at center. Input contains several colored crystals near grey magma chamber cores (grey X). Need to measure each crystal's displacement from its nearest core, overlay all displacements onto a single core to reconstruct original geode cross-section. Interpretation: For each colored cell (non-grey, non-black), find nearest X (grey) cell (maybe Manhattan distance). Compute vector from X to the colored cell (dx, dy). Then place that colored cell relative to a reference core (maybe at origin) i.e., overlay all vectors onto a single core location (maybe at center of output 3x3). Output grid is 3x3 showing arrangement of colors around a central X? In examples output includes X at center? Let's examine. Example1 Input: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. We have X at (3,2), (3,4), (3,6), (7,8), (9,2). Also maybe others? Let's list. Input grid lines: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) 3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) 4: all . 5: all . 6: all . 7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) 8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) 9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) 10: all . Now output is 3x3: M R R O X O G G G So output grid shows M at top-left, R R top row middle/right, O left middle, X center, O right middle, G G G bottom row. Thus they overlaid all colored cells relative to nearest X, and the central X is the reference core (maybe the one at (3,5)?? Actually there is X at (3,5) which is between O's. In output, X is at center (row1 col1). The pattern of colors around matches relative positions of those colors to that X. Let's compute vectors relative to X at (3,5) (the central X maybe). For each colored cell, find nearest X (maybe Euclidean or Manhattan). Let's compute distances. List colored cells: M (2,1). Nearest X? X positions: (3,2) distance |1|+|1|=2; (3,5) distance |1|+|4|=5; (3,6) distance |1|+|5|=6; (7,7) distance 5+6=11; (9,2) distance 7+1=8. So nearest is (3,2). Vector from X (3,2) to M (2,1) = (-1,-1). In output, M appears at top-left relative to X (center). Indeed top-left is (-1,-1). Good. R at (8,2) and (8,3). Nearest X? For (8,2): distances to Xs: (7,7) distance 1+5=6; (9,2) distance 1+0=1 (closest). So nearest X is (9,2). Vector from X (9,2) to R (8,2) = (-1,0). That's top middle relative to X. Output top middle is R. Good. R at (8,3): nearest X? (9,2) distance 1+1=2; (7,7) distance 1+4=5; (3,5) distance 5+2=7. So nearest X (9,2). Vector = (-1,+1). That's top right relative to X. Output top right is R. Good. O at (3,4) and (3,6). For O at (3,4): nearest X? X at (3,5) distance 0+1=1; X at (3,2) distance 0+2=2; etc. So nearest X (3,5). Vector = (0,-1) left of X. Output left middle is O. O at (3,6): nearest X (3,5) distance 0+1=1. Vector = (0,+1) right of X. Output right middle O. Good. G at (8,6),(8 ... [8020 chars truncated]
"A chef's mise en place was knocked off the counter—each ingredient landed near one of several identical cutting board marks scattered across the floor."
120b: k=3
See: A dark kitchen floor with several grey cutting-board marks and colorful ingredients, each ingredient resting close to exactly one mark.
Do: Each ingredient remembers where it sat relative to its cutting board mark. Reassemble the original mise en place by placing each ingredient at its remembered offset on a single board.
Grid: The floor is an 11x11 dark surface. The cutting board is a 3x3 arrangement with a grey center mark.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input 11x11 with many empty cells '.' and some colored cells and X marks (grey). Output is a small 3x3 grid (maybe the cutting board). The description: cutting board is 3x3 arrangement with a grey center mark. So we need to locate a 3x3 region where the center is X (grey). Then we need to place each ingredient (colored cells) at its offset relative to its associated X mark (cutting board mark). Each ingredient rests close to exactly one mark. So each colored cell is near an X (maybe adjacent). The ingredient remembers where it sat relative to its cutting board mark. So we need to reconstruct original arrangement by placing each ingredient at its offset from the X (center) in a 3x3 board. Thus we need to find all X marks (grey) that serve as cutting board marks? In examples, there is a central X in the 3x3 board output? Let's examine Example1. Input example1: Let's map coordinates. We'll parse quickly. Rows 0-10. Row2: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) Row3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) Output: M R R O X O G G G That's a 3x3 grid. Center is X. The arrangement matches positions relative to some X? Let's see which X is the center? Probably the X at (9,2) maybe? Let's compute offsets of other colored cells relative to that X. Center X at (9,2). Offsets: M at (2,1) far away not adjacent. Not likely. Maybe the board is formed by taking the smallest bounding box that contains all colored cells and X? But output is 3x3. Let's examine positions of colored cells relative to X's that are near them. We have multiple X's: at (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). The output board includes colors: M at top-left, O at top-middle and top-right? Actually output rows: Row0: M R R Row1: O X O Row2: G G G So center X. The top row has M at left, R at middle and right. The middle row has O left, X center, O right. Bottom row all G. Now look at input: Where are M, R, O, G relative to some X? Perhaps each colored cell is adjacent (Manhattan distance?) to a particular X, and the offset (dx,dy) from that X is recorded. Then we reconstruct board by placing each colored cell at that offset relative to the central X (the one that is the "cutting board"). Thus we need to find a central X that has other X's around? In output only one X appears (center). So maybe we pick the X that has other X's around it (forming a plus shape). In example1, there are X's at (3,2) and (9,2) vertical line, also at (3,5) and (7,7). Not obvious. Let's compute relative positions of colored cells to X at (3,2). Offsets: M (2,1): offset (-1,-1) (row-1, col-1) => top-left. O at (3,4): offset (0,2) => two right. O at (3,6): offset (0,4) => four right. R at (8,2): offset (5,0) => down 5. R at (8,3): offset (5,1) => down5 right ... [8907 chars truncated]
"A symphony score was torn apart and the fragments pinned to a corkboard—each note cluster clings near a treble clef it once belonged to."
120b: k=3
See: A dark corkboard with several grey treble clefs and colorful note fragments, each fragment pinned near one clef.
Do: Read where each note sits relative to its nearest clef. Overlay all fragments onto one staff to reconstruct the lost chord.
Grid: The corkboard is an 11x11 dark surface. The chord is a 3x3 arrangement with a grey clef at center.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input 11x11, output 3x3. The description: "dark corkboard with several grey treble clefs and colorful note fragments, each fragment pinned near one clef. Read where each note sits relative to its nearest clef. Overlay all fragments onto one staff to reconstruct the lost chord. Grid details: The corkboard is an 11x11 dark surface. The chord is a 3x3 arrangement with a grey clef at center." Interpretation: There is a grey clef (X) at center of output 3x3. Input contains multiple X's (grey). Each X is a clef. Around each X there are colored fragments (non-X). For each X, we look at relative positions of colored cells around it (maybe immediate neighbors?) and map them onto a 3x3 output where the X is at center (position (2,2) if 1-indexed). Then overlay all fragments from each X onto same output, maybe combining (if overlapping same color? maybe they match). The output shows arrangement of colors around central X. Let's test with Example1. Input Example1 grid: Let's locate X's. Provided grid lines: Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (3,2) Row4: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (4,3) and X at (4,6). O at (4,5) and (4,7) Row5: all . Row6: all . Row7: all . Row8: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (8,8) Row9: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (9,3),(9,4); G at (9,7),(9,8),(9,9) Row10: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (10,3) Row11: all . So X positions: (4,3), (4,6), (8,8), (10,3). Possibly also others? That's it. Now output 3x3: M R R O X O G G G So central X, with surrounding colors: top row M R R, middle row O X O, bottom row G G G. We need to see if each X's surrounding colors produce parts of this. Consider X at (4,3). Look at its neighboring cells (maybe 8-neighborhood). Coordinates: row4 col3. Adjacent cells: up (3,3) is '.'; down (5,3) '.'; left (4,2) '.'; right (4,4) '.'; diagonals: (3,2) M, (3,4) '.'; (5,2) '.'; (5,4) '.'. So only M at (3,2) which is up-left diagonal relative to X. In output, M appears at top-left relative to X (position (-1,-1)). Indeed output top-left is M. Good. Now X at (4,6). Its neighbors: up (3,6) '.'; down (5,6) '.'; left (4,5) O; right (4,7) O; diagonals: (3,5) '.'; (3,7) '.'; (5,5) '.'; (5,7) '.'. So O left and right of X. In output, O appears left and right of center (positions (0,-1) and (0,+1)). Indeed output middle row O X O. Good. X at (8,8). Neighbors: up (7,8) '.'; down (9,8) G; left (8,7) '.'; right (8,9) '.'; diagonals: (7,7) '.'; (7,9) '.'; (9,7) G; (9,9) G. So G at down, down-left, down-right (south, southwest, southeast). In output bottom row G G G (positions (+1, -1,0,+1)). Indeed matches. X at (10,3). Neighbors: up (9,3) R; up-right (9,4) R; right (10,4) '.'; down (11,3) '.'; etc. Also maybe up-left (9,2) '.'; down-left (11,2) '.'; down-right (11,4) '.'; left (10,2) '.' . So R at up and up-right (north, northeast). In output top row has R R at positions ( -1,0) and (-1,+1). Indeed top row: M R R (positions left, center? ... [8529 chars truncated]
"After a play, players scatter across the field, each still within a step of the yard marker they were assigned to. The coach reconstructs the formation from their displacements."
120b: fail
See: A dark field with several grey yard markers and colorful players, each player standing close to one marker.
Do: Measure each player's offset from their nearest marker. Collapse all offsets onto a single marker to reveal the original formation.
Grid: The field is 11x11 dark turf. The formation is a 3x3 diagram with a grey marker at center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 11x11 with many colors. Output is 3x3 diagram with a grey marker at center? In example output: M R R O X O G G G Here center is X (grey). The description: dark field with several grey yard markers and colorful players, each player standing close to one marker. Measure each player's offset from their nearest marker. Collapse all offsets onto a single marker to reveal original formation. Interpretation: There are multiple markers (grey X) in input. Each colored player (non-grey, non-black?) is near a marker. For each player, compute vector offset from its nearest marker (dx,dy). Then apply those offsets relative to a single reference marker (maybe the central marker) to reconstruct original pattern. Thus output is a 3x3 grid showing arrangement of players relative to a marker at center (X). In example, we need to verify. Let's locate all X in example input. Example input grid (I'll index rows 0-10, cols 0-10). Let's list positions: Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2: col1 M (magenta) at (2,1) Row3: pattern ". . X . O X O . . . ." So X at (3,2) and (3,5). O at (3,4) and (3,6). Also maybe others. Row4 all . Row5 all . Row6 all . Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . .": X at (7,7) Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . .": R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . .": X at (9,2) Row10 all . So X positions: (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). Possibly also others? That's it. Now colored players: M at (2,1); O at (3,4) and (3,6); R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8). Also maybe others but not. Now for each player, find nearest X (by Manhattan distance?). Compute offset vector (player - marker). Then we will map these offsets onto a single reference marker (maybe the central one). Which marker is central? Possibly the one that is at the "center of mass" of markers? Or maybe the one that is at (3,5)?? Let's test. Compute offsets: Marker positions list: A (3,2) B (3,5) C (7,7) D (9,2) Now for each player: M at (2,1). Distances to markers: to A: |2-3|+|1-2|=1+1=2 to B: |2-3|+|1-5|=1+4=5 to C: |2-7|+|1-7|=5+6=11 to D: |2-9|+|1-2|=7+1=8 Nearest is A (3,2). Offset = player - marker = (2-3,1-2)=(-1,-1). So relative position up-left. O at (3,4). Distances: to A (3,2): |0|+|2|=2 to B (3,5): |0|+|1|=1 -> nearest B. Offset = (0, -1) (since col 4 -5 = -1). So left. O at (3,6). Distances: to B (3,5): 1 -> offset (0, +1) (col6-5=1). So right. R at (8,2). Distances: to D (9,2): |1|+0=1 -> nearest D. Offset = (-1,0) (row8-9=-1, col2-2=0) => up. R at (8,3). Distances: to D (9,2): |1|+|1|=2 to C (7,7): |1|+|4|=5 to B (3,5): |5|+|2|=7 to A (3,2): |5|+|1|=6 Nearest D (9,2) distance2? Actually D distance 2, A distance6, B7, C5. So nearest D. Offset = (8-9,3-2)=(-1,1) => up-right. G at (8,6). Distances: to C (7,7): |1|+|1|=2 to B (3,5): |5|+|1|=6 to D (9,2): |1|+|4|=5 to A (3,2): |5|+|4|=9 Nearest C. Offset = (1, -1) (row8-7=1, col6-7=-1) => down-left. G at (8,7). Distances: to C (7,7): 1 => offset (1,0 ... [7694 chars truncated]
"Storm fragments orbit the eyes of several dying cyclones. Each fragment remembers its bearing relative to the eye it circles."
120b: k=3
See: A dark sky with several grey cyclone eyes and colorful storm fragments, each fragment hovering near one eye.
Do: Note each fragment's position relative to its eye. Merge all eyes into one to reassemble the complete storm system.
Grid: The sky is an 11x11 dark expanse. The storm is a 3x3 pattern with a grey eye at center.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input is 11x11 with many empty cells (.) and some colored cells. Output is a small 3x3 grid (maybe extracted pattern). The description: "dark sky with several grey cyclone eyes and colorful storm fragments, each fragment hovering near one eye. Note each fragment's position relative to its eye. Merge all eyes into one to reassemble the complete storm system." So there are multiple "eyes" (grey X) each with surrounding colored fragments (other colors). Need to align them relative to eye and combine into a single pattern. In examples, output is 3x3 pattern. Let's analyze Example1. Input Example1 grid: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. I'll list non-blank cells: Row2 col1? Actually row2 (0-index) line: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) Row3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) Row7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) Row8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2), R at (8,3), G at (8,6), G at (8,7), G at (8,8) Row9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) So we have multiple X's: at (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). Possibly each X is an eye. Surrounding colored fragments near each eye: For eye at (3,2), adjacent cells maybe O at (3,4) not adjacent. Actually O at (3,4) is two columns away. Hmm. Maybe the pattern is 3x3 with eye at center (X) and fragments around it (colors). The output pattern for Example1 is: M R R O X O G G G That's a 3x3 grid with X at center (row1 col1). So they merged multiple eyes into one central X, and placed fragments relative to eye positions. Let's see each eye's surrounding fragments in input. Eye1 at (3,2). What colored cells are near it? Look at positions relative to (3,2). In input, there is M at (2,1) which is up-left diagonal (-1,-1). There is O at (3,4) which is (0,+2) not within 1 step. X at (3,5) is another eye. R at (8,2) far away. So maybe each eye has its own fragment set: For eye at (3,2), we have M at (-1,-1) relative. Also maybe O at (0,+2) but that's two steps away maybe considered right? Not sure. Eye2 at (3,5). Surrounding: O at (3,4) left (-0,-1). O at (3,6) right (+0,+1). X at (3,2) left far. Also maybe other colors? Not. Eye3 at (7,7). Surrounding: maybe G at (8,6) down-left (+1,-1). G at (8,7) down ( +1,0). G at (8,8) down-right (+1,+1). Also maybe something else? No. Eye4 at (9,2). Surrounding: R at (8,2) up ( -1,0). R at (8,3) up-right (-1,+1). Also maybe something else? Not. Now output pattern: positions relative to center X (0,0). Let's map output coordinates (row, col) with center at (1,1) (since 3x3). Output grid: Row0: M R R Row1: O X O Row2: G G G So relative positions: (-1,-1): M (-1,0): R (-1,1): R (0,-1): O (0,0): X (0,1): O (1,-1): G (1,0): G (1,1): G Now compare with each eye's fragments: Eye at (3,2): M at (-1,-1) relative to eye? Eye (3,2) -> M at (2,1) indeed (-1,-1). So M maps to (-1,-1) slot. Eye at (9,2): R at (8,2) (-1,0) and R at (8,3) (-1,+1). So those map to (- ... [7879 chars truncated]
"Blueprints for a single room were photocopied onto transparencies and scattered—each transparency shows only a few tiles near its alignment crosshair."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark drafting table with several grey crosshair marks and colorful tile fragments, each fragment near one crosshair.
Do: Stack all transparencies by aligning their crosshairs. The overlapping tiles reveal the complete room layout.
Grid: The table is 11x11 dark space. The room is a 3x3 floor plan with a grey crosshair at center.
"Scouts planted flags near command posts across no-man's-land. Each flag's bearing from its post encodes one piece of the battle formation."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield with several grey command posts and colorful signal flags, each flag planted near one post.
Do: Read each flag's displacement from its command post. Collapse all readings onto a single tactical map to reveal the formation.
Grid: The battlefield is 11x11 dark ground. The tactical map is a 3x3 grid with a grey command post at center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 11x11 with many colors, output 3x3. In example 1, output grid shows three rows: "M R R", "O X O", "G G G". These correspond to some pattern of flags relative to command post (grey X?). Let's examine example input. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". M . . . . . . . . ." => M at (2,1) 3: ". . X . O X O . . . ." => X at (3,2), O at (3,4), X at (3,5), O at (3,6) 4: all . 5: all . 6: all . 7: ". . . . . . . X . . ." => X at (7,7) 8: ". . R R . . G G G . ." => R at (8,2),(8,3); G at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) 9: ". . X . . . . . . . ." => X at (9,2) 10: all . We need to produce 3x3 output with center maybe X? Output center is X (row1 col1). Indeed output grid: row0: M R R ; row1: O X O ; row2: G G G. So center X corresponds to some X in input? There are multiple X's. Which one is central command post? Possibly the X that is surrounded by flags? Let's see positions: there is an X at (3,2) near O's at (3,4) and (3,6) but not symmetrical. Another X at (3,5) between O's? Actually O at (3,4) left, O at (3,6) right, X at (3,5) between them. That seems like a central command post with flags O left and right. Also there is X at (7,7) isolated. X at (9,2) near R's? R at (8,2),(8,3) above. So maybe each X is a command post, and we read flags around it (colored cells) and map them onto a 3x3 output where each X becomes center and surrounding colors placed relative positions? But output only 3x3, not multiple. Maybe we need to collapse all readings onto a single map: "Collapse all readings onto a single tactical map". So we take each X as a center, look at relative positions of colored flags (non-X, non-.) around it, and overlay them onto a 3x3 grid (center X). If multiple X's produce overlapping positions, maybe they combine? In example, we have three X's: at (3,2), (3,5), (7,7), (9,2). Actually four X's. Let's examine each. X at (3,2): what colored cells adjacent? Look at neighbors (including maybe up/down/left/right?) The output includes M at top-left? M is at (2,1) which is up-left relative to X at (3,2) (row-1, col-1). Indeed M appears in output at (0,0) top-left. So that matches. X at (3,5): O at (3,4) left (same row, col-1) => output O at (1,0) left of center. O at (3,6) right => output O at (1,2) right of center. Also maybe other flags? None. X at (9,2): R at (8,2) up => output R at (0,1) (top middle). R at (8,3) up-right => output R at (0,2) top right? Wait top right is (0,2) which in output is R. Yes. Also maybe other? No. X at (7,7): G at (8,6) down-left => output G at (2,0) bottom left. G at (8,7) down => output G at (2,1) bottom middle. G at (8,8) down-right => output G at (2,2) bottom right. Thus each X contributed flags in its immediate 8-neighbor positions (including diagonals). The output grid is the aggregation of all such neighbor colors onto a 3x3 map centered on X. If multiple X's produce same relative position, maybe they are sam ... [5431 chars truncated]
"Actors rehearse on separate chalk marks across a vast dark stage. Each actor holds their blocking position relative to their mark—only the director sees how they form one tableau."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with several grey chalk marks and colorful actors, each standing near one mark.
Do: Note each actor's offset from their mark. Bring all marks together to a single spot and the actors form the director's intended tableau.
Grid: The stage is 11x11 dark boards. The tableau is a 3x3 scene with a grey mark at center.
"Seeds were scattered by wind, each landing near a different garden stone. Every seed remembers where in the flowerbed it was meant to bloom."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark garden plot with several grey stones and colorful seeds, each seed resting near one stone.
Do: Each seed's distance and direction from its stone tells where it belongs in the planting pattern. Gather all instructions onto one stone to see the flowerbed design.
Grid: The garden is 11x11 dark soil. The flowerbed is a 3x3 plot with a grey stone at center.
See: The input is a 3×3 grid. Exactly one row or one column is filled with a single uniform color (all three cells are the same color). The remaining cells contain a mix of other colors.
Do: 1. Identify the uniform line: find the row or column where all three cells share the same color. Note whether it is a row (top=0, middle=1, bottom=2) or a column (left=0, middle=1, right=2). 2. Create a 9×9 output grid filled entirely with black (.). 3. If the uniform line is a row at position R (0, 1, or 2): copy the entire 3×3 input into the output three times side by side, placing them in output rows R×3 through R×3+2, spanning all 9 columns. 4. If the uniform line is a column at position C (0, 1, or 2): copy the entire 3×3 input into the output three times stacked vertically, placing them in output columns C×3 through C×3+2, spanning all 9 rows.
Grid: The input grid is always 3×3. The output grid is always 9×9 (a 3×3 arrangement of 3×3 blocks). The background fill is black (.). The 3×3 input is tiled three times along the axis indicated by the uniform row or column, placed in the corresponding strip of the 9×9 grid.
"A banner unfurls along the flagpole that holds it"
120b: k=3
See: A small 3×3 tapestry hangs in a dark hall. One thread—a single row or column—is woven from a single pure color, forming the flagpole that holds the whole design together. The rest of the weave is a patchwork of different colors.
Do: The flagpole knows which wall it belongs to. A row-pole is horizontal and knows its height; a column-pole is vertical and knows its side. The tapestry longs to be seen, so it unfurls itself three times along the direction of its pole, like a banner repeating in the wind. Wherever the banner doesn't reach, the dark hall remains—empty black stone stretching into shadow.
Grid: The dark hall is a 9×9 chamber of black stone. The flagpole's position decides which strip of the chamber gets decorated: a horizontal pole at the top, middle, or bottom places three copies side by side in the matching horizontal band; a vertical pole on the left, center, or right stacks three copies in the matching vertical band. The rest of the chamber stays dark and bare.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input is 3x3 grid. Output is 9x9 grid. The description: there is a "flagpole" which is a single row or column of uniform color (all same). In examples, we need to identify which row or column is uniform. Example1 input: B B B M R R R R M Row0: B B B all same -> uniform row (horizontal pole) at top? Actually row0 is uniform B. So horizontal pole at top. Output: The top three rows (band) contain three copies side by side? Let's see output: first row: B B B B B B B B B (9 cells). That's three copies of row0 concatenated horizontally: B B B repeated three times. Indeed row0 repeated three times horizontally across the 9 columns. Row1 output: M R R M R R M R R (that's row1 repeated three times). Row2 output: R R M R R M R R M (row2 repeated three times). Then rows 3-8 are all '.' (black). So the flagpole is horizontal at top, so we fill the top band (first 3 rows) with the 3x3 pattern repeated horizontally three times (i.e., tile horizontally). The rest rows are black. Example2 input: R Y G R G Y R G Y Check uniform column? Column0: R,R,R all same -> vertical pole on left. Indeed column0 uniform R. Output: The leftmost three columns (band) contain three copies stacked vertically? Let's see output: 9x9 grid. The first three columns contain the original 3x3 pattern repeated vertically three times. Let's examine output rows: Row0: R Y G . . . . . . (first three columns R Y G). Row1: R G Y . . . . . . (R G Y). Row2: R G Y . . . . . . (R G Y). Row3: R Y G . . . . . . (again). Row4: R G Y ... Row5: R G Y ... Row6: R Y G ... Row7: R G Y ... Row8: R G Y ... So indeed the 3x3 pattern is repeated vertically three times in the leftmost three columns. The rest columns are '.'. Example3 input: G B M G M B G B M Check uniform column? Column0: G,G,G all same -> vertical pole left again. Output similar: leftmost three columns repeated vertically three times. Indeed output shows same pattern repeated vertically. Thus rule: Identify the uniform row (all same color) or uniform column (all same). If uniform row, repeat the whole 3x3 pattern horizontally three times, placing in the rows corresponding to that row's position? Wait in example1, uniform row is top row (row0). Output placed repeated pattern in rows 0-2 (the top band). So the band corresponds to the row index of the uniform row: top, middle, bottom. Since uniform row is at top, we fill rows 0-2. If uniform row were middle (row1), we would fill rows 3-5? Actually "horizontal pole at the top, middle, or bottom places three copies side by side in the matching horizontal band". So if uniform row is middle (row1), the band would be rows 3-5? Wait the band is a horizontal band of height 3. The 9x9 grid is divided into three horizontal bands: top rows 0-2, middle rows 3-5, bottom rows 6-8. The pole's position (top/middle/bottom) determines which band gets the repeated pattern. For a uniform row at top, we fill top band. For uniform row at middle, fill middle band. For ... [3454 chars truncated]
"A cell divides along its spine, replicating itself in the direction its backbone runs"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 organism with one structural spine — a row or column of identical tissue running through it.
Do: The spine determines the axis of mitosis. The organism replicates itself three times along that axis, embedding into a larger 9×9 body of dormant (black) tissue at the position matching the spine's location.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9, mostly black. Three copies of the input arranged in a strip corresponding to the spine's position and orientation.
"A constellation is mirrored across the sky along the axis where a single star type forms an unbroken meridian"
120b: k=4
See: A 3×3 star cluster with one meridian — a row or column of identical stellar class.
Do: Project onto a 9×9 dark sky (black). The meridian's direction and position select the band of sky. Tile the cluster three times along that band.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 dark sky with three copies of the input tiled along the meridian's band.
We need to understand rule. Input 3x3, output 9x9 with three copies tiled along a band determined by a "meridian": a row or column of identical stellar class (i.e., a row or column where all three cells are same color). In each example, find such row/column. Example1 input: B B B M R R R R M Row0 all B (identical). So meridian is row (horizontal) at top. Output: first three rows are tiled copies? Let's see output: first row: B B B B B B B B B (that's three copies of row0 horizontally? Actually row0 is B B B. Tiling three times along the band (row direction) means repeat the 3x3 block three times horizontally? But output is 9x9. They placed three copies of the entire 3x3 input tiled along that row band? Let's examine output rows 0-2: they show pattern: Row0: B B B B B B B B B (that's B row repeated 3 times) Row1: M R R M R R M R R (that's row1 repeated 3 times) Row2: R R M R R M R R M (row2 repeated 3 times) Rows 3-8 are all '.' (black). So they placed the 3x3 input tiled horizontally across columns, but only in the band of rows corresponding to the meridian row? Actually they placed it in rows 0-2 (the same rows as the input). So the band is the row where the identical row occurs (row0). They tile the whole 3x3 block horizontally across the 9 columns, but only within that band of rows (the three rows). So output is 9x9: the top three rows contain the tiled pattern, rest black. Thus rule: Identify a row (or column) where all three cells are same color. That row/column defines the orientation (horizontal if row, vertical if column) and position (which rows/columns to fill). Then tile the entire input 3x3 block repeatedly along that orientation, filling a 9x9 region that spans the whole dimension in that direction, but only occupies the three rows (if horizontal) or three columns (if vertical) corresponding to that row/column. Check Example2: Input: R Y G R G Y R G Y Look for a row or column of identical colors. Columns: column0 is R,R,R all same. So meridian is column0 (vertical). Output: they tiled vertically? Let's see output: 9x9 grid. Provided output shows first three columns filled with pattern repeated vertically? Let's view rows: Row0: R Y G . . . . . . Row1: R G Y . . . . . . Row2: R G Y . . . . . . Row3: R Y G . . . . . . Row4: R G Y . . . . . . Row5: R G Y . . . . . . Row6: R Y G . . . . . . Row7: R G Y . . . . . . Row8: R G Y . . . . . . So they tiled the 3x3 input vertically across rows, but only in first three columns (the meridian column). Indeed column0 is all R, so they placed the 3x3 block repeated vertically (i.e., three copies stacked) within columns 0-2, rows 0-8. So output has pattern repeated every 3 rows, same as input rows repeated downwards. Thus rule matches. Example3: Input: G B M G M B G B M Column0 all G, so meridian vertical column0. Output same as example2: pattern repeated vertically in first three columns. Example4: Input: Y Y M G G G M M Y Row1 (index1) is G G G all same, so meridian horizontal row1. Output: ... [4076 chars truncated]
"The flotilla sails in the channel marked by the current — a single uniform flow tells the fleet which heading to repeat"
120b: k=3
See: A 3×3 flotilla with one current — a row or column of uniform water color.
Do: On a 9×9 open sea (black), the current's axis and position define the shipping channel. Deploy three copies of the flotilla along that channel.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 sea with three copies of the input tiled in a strip at the current's position.
We need to understand rule. Input 3x3, output 9x9. The description: "A 3×3 flotilla with one current — a row or column of uniform water color. What to do: On a 9×9 open sea (black), the current's axis and position define the shipping channel. Deploy three copies of the flotilla along that channel." Interpretation: In input, there is a row or column where all three cells are same color (uniform water). That defines axis (row or column) and position (which row/col). Then output: a 9x9 grid initially black (.) and we place three copies of the 3x3 input tiled along that axis (i.e., along the row or column) at that position. Let's verify with examples. Example1 Input: B B B M R R R R M We need to find a uniform row or column. Row1: B B B all same (blue). So current is row, position row 0 (top). Output: 9x9 with three copies of input tiled in a strip at that row? Let's see output: first three rows are copies? Output shows first three rows: row0: B B B B B B B B B (that's three copies horizontally? Actually each copy is 3 columns wide, three copies side by side produce 9 columns). Row1: M R R M R R M R R (three copies horizontally). Row2: R R M R R M R R M (three copies). Then rows 3-8 are all black. So indeed we placed three copies side by side horizontally, forming a 3x9 block at top rows (rows 0-2). That's a horizontal strip (since current row). So we tile the 3x3 input horizontally across columns, three times, at the row position (top). So the strip occupies rows 0-2 (the same rows as the uniform row). Good. Example2 Input: R Y G R G Y R G Y Uniform column? Let's check columns: col0: R,R,R all same (red). So current is column at position 0 (leftmost). Output: we see first three columns are copies vertically? Output shows 9x9 grid where first three columns contain three copies stacked vertically? Let's examine output: rows 0-2: "R Y G . . . . . ." etc. Actually output rows 0-2 show the original pattern in first three columns, then rows 3-5 repeat same pattern, rows 6-8 repeat same pattern. So we have three copies stacked vertically (i.e., along rows) in column strip at leftmost columns (col0-2). So we tile the 3x3 input vertically three times, forming a 9x3 block at left side. That matches column current. Example3 Input: G B M G M B G B M Uniform column? col0: G,G,G all same (green). So column at position 0 again. Output: similar to example2: three copies stacked vertically. Indeed output shows first three columns repeated three times vertically. Thus rule: Identify the uniform row or column (all three cells same). If it's a row, place three copies of the entire 3x3 input side by side horizontally, aligning the rows of the copy with that row (i.e., rows 0-2 if row0 uniform, rows 3-5 if row1 uniform, rows 6-8 if row2 uniform). If it's a column, place three copies stacked vertically, aligning columns with that column (col0 uniform => columns 0-2; col1 uniform => columns 3-5; col2 uniform => columns 6-8). The rest cells ... [2350 chars truncated]
"The signal propagates down the bus where the ground rail runs — one clean rail of uniform voltage sets the data path"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 circuit block with one ground rail — a row or column of identical voltage.
Do: Mount on a 9×9 circuit board of null state (black). The ground rail's orientation and pin position select the bus. Replicate the circuit block three times along that bus.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 null board with three copies of the input tiled in a strip at the ground rail's position.
"The pantheon manifests along the sacred axis — where the acolytes stand in unison marks the path of divine procession"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 temple tableau with one row or column of acolytes dressed in the same sacred color.
Do: Cast the tableau onto a 9×9 void (black). The acolytes' alignment and position in the tableau select the sacred axis. The pantheon processes three times along that axis.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 void with three copies of the input tiled along the sacred axis at the acolytes' position.
"The troupe repeats its formation along the line where the dancers move in lockstep — uniform footwork marks the parade route"
120b: fail
See: A 3×3 dance formation with one line of dancers in lockstep — a row or column of matching color.
Do: Choreograph on a 9×9 empty floor (black). The lockstep line's axis and position determine the parade route. Perform the formation three times along that route.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 empty floor with three copies of the formation tiled along the lockstep line's route.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 9x9 with three copies of formation tiled along lockstep line's route. In example, input: Row1: B B B Row2: M R R Row3: R R M We see a line of matching color: first row all B (blue). That's a row of same color. So lockstep line is that row. Its axis and position determine parade route. Perform formation three times along that route. Output shows top three rows are pattern repeated horizontally? Let's see output: first three rows are: Row1: B B B B B B B B B (9 B's) Row2: M R R M R R M R R Row3: R R M R R M R R M So they tiled the 3x3 input horizontally three times (i.e., repeat columns) because lockstep line is a row, so route is horizontal across columns? Actually they placed three copies side by side, making width 9, height 3. The rest rows are empty (black .). So they placed three copies along the row direction (i.e., across columns) anchored at the row where the uniform line is (row 1). So they fill rows 1-3? Wait they filled rows 1-3 with repeated pattern, not just row1. The whole 3x3 block repeated horizontally three times, occupying rows 1-3. So they placed three copies of the whole formation (the 3x3) along the direction of the uniform line (row). Since uniform line is a row, direction is horizontal, so they tile horizontally. Thus rule: Find the line (row or column) where all three cells are same color. That line determines orientation: if it's a row, repeat the entire input block three times horizontally (i.e., concatenate three copies side by side) and place them starting at that row (i.e., rows of block remain same). Output grid size 9x9, with other cells black. If uniform line is a column, then repeat vertically (stack three copies) along that column. Now test input: M M G Y Y G Y Y G Let's examine rows: Row1: M M G not uniform. Row2: Y Y G not uniform. Row3: Y Y G not uniform. Columns: Column1: M, Y, Y -> not uniform. Column2: M, Y, Y -> not uniform. Column3: G, G, G -> uniform column of G (green). So lockstep line is column 3 (rightmost). So orientation is vertical. We need to repeat the 3x3 formation three times along that column direction (i.e., vertically). So we will stack three copies of the 3x3 block vertically, making height 9, width 3? But output must be 9x9, so we need to place the 3x3 block repeated vertically, but also maybe centered? In example, they placed block at top rows (rows 1-3) because uniform row was at top (row1). So they placed block starting at that row? Actually uniform row is row1, they placed block rows 1-3 (the block height). So they anchored at that row as the top of block? The uniform row is the first row of the block. So they placed block such that the uniform line aligns with the top edge? Wait uniform line is row1 of block. In output, row1 is uniform B row repeated horizontally. So the uniform line appears as the first row of the repeated block. So they placed block starting at that row (row1). So for column case, uniform column is column3 of ... [1260 chars truncated]
"The mineral deposit is replicated along the fault line — one vein of pure ore reveals the direction of the seam"
120b: k=1
See: A 3×3 rock sample with one vein of pure ore — a row or column of uniform mineral.
Do: Set in a 9×9 bedrock matrix (black). The vein's orientation and position in the sample mark the seam. Deposit three copies of the sample along that seam.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 bedrock with three copies of the input tiled in a strip at the vein's position.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input: Row1: B B B Row2: M R R Row3: R R M Output first three rows are: Row1: B B B B B B B B B Row2: M R R M R R M R R Row3: R R M R R M R R M Then rows 4-9 are all '.' (black). So they placed three copies of the input tiled horizontally? Actually they placed three copies side by side in a strip of height 3, width 9. That's three copies horizontally. The "vein" is a row or column of uniform mineral in the 3x3 sample. In input, which row or column is uniform? Let's examine: Row1 is B B B (uniform). Column? Column1: B M R (not uniform). So the uniform row is row1. That marks the seam orientation? The description: "Set in a 9×9 bedrock matrix (black). The vein's orientation and position in the sample mark the seam. Deposit three copies of the sample along that seam." So we have a uniform row (vein) at row1. So orientation is horizontal (since row). Position is row index 1 (top). So we place three copies of the sample along that seam: meaning we tile the 3x3 sample three times along that row? In output, the three copies are placed starting at top rows (rows 1-3) across columns 1-9. That's consistent: we placed three copies side by side horizontally, aligning the uniform row (vein) with the seam? Actually seam is the row where the uniform row sits? The seam is a horizontal line across the 9x9 matrix at the same vertical position as the uniform row within each copy? In output, the uniform row (B B B) appears repeated across the top row of each copy? Let's see: In output row1 (top row) is B B B B B B B B B, which is three copies of row1 concatenated. Row2 is M R R M R R M R R, which is row2 repeated three times. Row3 similarly. So they tiled the whole 3x3 sample horizontally three times, occupying rows 1-3 of the 9x9. The rest rows are black. Thus rule: Find the uniform row or column (all same color) in the 3x3 input. If it's a row, output consists of three copies of the input tiled horizontally, placed such that the uniform row aligns with the top of the output? Actually placed at the same vertical offset as the uniform row's position within the 3x3? In example, uniform row is row1 (index 0). So the tiled block occupies rows 0-2 (i.e., starting at row0). If uniform row were row2 (index 1) maybe the block would be placed starting at row3? Wait we need to think: The seam is the line where the uniform row/column is located. For a row, seam is horizontal line across the 9x9 at that row index? But they placed three copies along that seam, meaning the seam is the line where the copies are placed? Actually they placed copies side by side along the seam, which is a horizontal line? The seam is a line across the 9x9 where the copies are aligned. For a horizontal vein, the seam is a horizontal line; the copies are placed along that line, meaning they are arranged horizontally (side by side) with the vein row being the top row of the block? Not sure. Let's hypothesize: If uniform col ... [3579 chars truncated]
"The filling spreads across whichever shelf of the oven rack holds the baking sheet"
120b: k=1
See: A 3×3 pastry where one layer is a single pure ingredient — the baking sheet — and the rest is mixed filling.
Do: Place the pastry on a 9×9 oven rack (black background). The baking sheet's position on the rack determines which shelf gets loaded: tile the pastry three times along that shelf, leaving the other shelves empty.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 black grid with a strip of three tiled copies of the input placed at the position indicated by the uniform layer.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input 3x3 grid, output 9x9 black background ('.' = black). There is a "uniform layer" i.e., a single pure ingredient — the baking sheet — which is a layer of uniform color in the input? In example, input:
B B B
M R R
R R M
We see first row all B (blue). That's uniform layer (single pure ingredient). That determines which shelf (row) gets loaded. Output shows three tiled copies of the input placed at that shelf (i.e., row block) leaving other shelves empty (black). Output shows first three rows (since B row is top) contain tiled copies: they are 9x9 grid where the 3x3 input is repeated horizontally three times across the row block (i.e., 3 copies side by side) and also vertically? Wait they said "tile the pastry three times along that shelf". Means along that shelf (row) we tile horizontally three times, but not vertically. So output has three rows (the shelf) each of length 9, containing three copies of the 3x3 input side by side. The rest rows are black.
Let's verify with example output.
Given input matrix:
Row0: B B B
Row1: M R R
Row2: R R M
Now output first three rows:
Row0 output: B B B B B B B B B (makes sense: row0 of input repeated three times horizontally)
Row1 output: M R R M R R M R R (row1 repeated)
Row2 output: R R M R R M R R M (row2 repeated)
Rows 3-8 are all '.'.
Thus rule: Find the row in input that is uniform (all same color). That row indicates which shelf (i.e., which block of three rows) in the 9x9 output will contain the tiled pattern. The uniform row's index (0,1,2) determines which block of three rows (0-2, 3-5, 6-8) is filled. In example, uniform row is row0, so top block (rows0-2) filled.
Now test input:
M M G
Y Y G
Y Y G
We need to find uniform row: Row0: M M G (not uniform). Row1: Y Y G (not uniform). Row2: Y Y G (same as row1, not uniform). No row is all same color. Hmm maybe uniform column? But description says "one layer is a single pure ingredient — the baking sheet". Could be a column? In example, uniform row is top row all B. Could also be uniform column in other cases. But test input may have uniform column? Let's check columns:
Col0: M, Y, Y (not uniform). Col1: M, Y, Y (not uniform). Col2: G, G, G (all G!). Yes column 2 is uniform green. So uniform layer could be a column. The "layer" could be any row or column? The description: "A 3×3 pastry where one layer is a single pure ingredient — the baking sheet — and the rest is mixed filling." Could be a row or column. In example, uniform row. In test, uniform column.
Now need to map to output: The uniform column's position determines which shelf gets loaded. But shelf is a row block. How to map column index to which block? Possibly column index determines which of the three horizontal strips (i.e., which set of three columns) gets tiled? But output is 9x9 with black background, and we tile the pastry three times along that shelf (i.e., along that row). If uniform column indicates vert
... [4102 chars truncated]
"A chord repeats across the measure wherever the drone note holds its position"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 arrangement of notes where one voice sustains a single unbroken tone — the drone.
Do: Lay the chord into a 9×9 score of silence. The drone's voice (row or column) and its position in the chord set where the repetitions land — the chord echoes three times along the drone's axis at the drone's register.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9, silence (black) except for a strip of three copies of the input placed at the drone's corresponding position.
"The team runs its play in the lane marked by the player wearing all one color"
120b: fail
See: A 3×3 formation of players, one row or column wearing matching jerseys.
Do: On a 9×9 field (empty/black), the uniformed line picks the lane. The whole formation is repeated three times along that lane at the matching position, and the rest of the field stays empty.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 empty field with three copies of the formation tiled in a strip matching the uniformed line's position and direction.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input is 3x3 grid with colors. Output is 9x9 grid with three copies of formation tiled in a strip matching the uniformed line's position and direction. The description: "A 3×3 formation of players, one row or column wearing matching jerseys." So in input, there is a row or column where all three cells have same color (matching jerseys). That line determines the lane (direction) along which we repeat the formation three times in the 9x9 output. The rest of the field stays empty (black '.') In example 1: Input: B B B M R R R R M We see first row all B (blue). So uniformed line is row 0 (top row). Direction is horizontal (row). So we repeat the 3x3 formation three times along that lane (i.e., horizontally?) Actually output shows first three rows (0-2) filled with pattern repeated horizontally across 9 columns. Let's examine output: Row0: B B B B B B B B B (9 B's) -> that's three copies of first row (BBB) concatenated horizontally. Row1: M R R M R R M R R -> that's three copies of second row (M R R) concatenated. Row2: R R M R R M R R M -> three copies of third row (R R M) concatenated. Rows 3-8 are all '.'. Thus the lane is the top row, and we repeat the 3x3 block horizontally across the row, filling rows 0-2 (the same vertical extent as the block) but extending horizontally to 9 columns (3 copies). So the output is a 9x9 where the block is tiled 3 times horizontally, anchored at the row where uniform line is (top). The rest rows are empty. If uniform line were a column, we would tile vertically? Let's hypothesize: If uniform line is a column (all same color), then we would repeat the formation three times vertically along that column, filling columns 0-2? Actually we need to think: The lane direction is the line's orientation: row => horizontal lane; column => vertical lane. The formation repeated three times along that lane at the matching position. So for column uniform, we would repeat vertically, i.e., three copies stacked vertically, occupying columns 0-2? Wait the lane is the column, so the repeated copies would be placed along that column direction, i.e., vertically, but the formation is 3x3, so each copy occupies 3 rows and 3 columns. If we tile vertically, we would have 9 rows and 3 columns filled, rest empty. Thus output would be 9x9 with leftmost 3 columns filled (if column is first column) and rest '.'. Now test input: M M G Y Y G Y Y G We need to find a row or column where all three cells are same color. Rows: Row0: M M G (not all same) Row1: Y Y G (not all same) Row2: Y Y G (not all same) Columns: Col0: M, Y, Y -> not same Col1: M, Y, Y -> not same Col2: G, G, G -> all G (green). So uniform line is column 2 (rightmost column) all G. Thus direction is vertical (column). So we will repeat the 3x3 formation three times vertically along that column, i.e., produce a 9x9 grid where columns 0-2 (the width of formation) are filled with three copies stacked verticall ... [3850 chars truncated]
"Storm clouds replicate along the front — the barometric wall decides the direction of the squall line"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 weather cell containing one uniform pressure front — a row or column of identical readings.
Do: Project onto a 9×9 atmosphere of calm (black). The pressure front's orientation sets the squall line direction; its position sets the latitude or longitude. Tile the weather cell three times along the front.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 calm grid with three copies of the input tiled along a strip at the pressure front's position.
"The building's floor plan is repeated along whichever load-bearing wall runs in a single material"
120b: k=4
See: A 3×3 blueprint with one structural wall — a row or column built from one uniform material.
Do: Expand to a 9×9 city block of empty lots (black). The load-bearing wall's orientation and position determine the avenue; tile the blueprint three times along that avenue.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 empty block with three copies of the input tiled in a strip matching the wall's position and axis.
We need to infer rule. From description: 3x3 input with one structural wall — a row or column built from one uniform material. So there is a row or column where all three cells are same color. That is the "wall". Then output is 9x9 with three copies of input tiled along that wall's orientation and position. Means we repeat the 3x3 pattern three times along the direction of the wall, forming a 3x9 or 9x3 strip? Actually output examples show. Example1 input: B B B M R R R R M Identify uniform row/col: first row B B B all same => wall is row at top (row0). Orientation horizontal. Position: top row. Output: 9x9 with three copies of input tiled in a strip matching the wall's position and axis. Since wall is top row, we tile input three times vertically? Let's see output: first three rows are the input repeated horizontally? Output rows 0-2: they show B B B B B B B B B (that's row0 repeated three times horizontally). Row1: M R R M R R M R R (that's row1 repeated three times). Row2: R R M R R M R R M (row2 repeated). So they tiled the 3x3 input three times side by side horizontally, making a 3x9 block at top of 9x9. The rest rows are empty (black). So they placed a 3x9 strip at top (since wall row is top). So orientation horizontal, placed strip at that row position (top). The strip occupies rows 0-2 (height 3) and columns 0-8 (full width). So they tiled along horizontal axis (i.e., repeated across columns). So rule: replicate input three times along axis perpendicular to wall? Wait wall is horizontal row; they repeated horizontally (along columns) which is parallel to wall? Actually wall is a row; repeating across columns extends the row horizontally, which is same orientation as wall (row). So they tiled along the direction of the wall (i.e., across columns). And placed at same vertical position (top). So output is 9x9 with the 3x9 block at same row index as wall (top). The rest black. Example2 input: R Y G R G Y R G Y Uniform column? Let's see column0: R,R,R all same => leftmost column is uniform red. That's a vertical wall at column0. Output: 9x9 with three copies tiled vertically? Let's see output: first three columns? Actually output shows first three rows repeated? Let's view output: rows0-2: R Y G . . . . . . (so first row of input placed at top-left 3 columns). Row1: R G Y ... Row2: R G Y ... Then rows3-5: R Y G ... etc. So they tiled the 3x3 input three times vertically (downwards) forming a 9x3 block on left side. Indeed rows0-8 have pattern repeated every 3 rows, columns0-2 contain the input pattern. So they placed a 9x3 block at left side (since wall column is leftmost). So they repeated input vertically (downwards) across rows, which is parallel to wall orientation (vertical). So rule: replicate input three times along the direction of the uniform line (wall), extending to fill 9x9, but only in that strip (3x9 or 9x3) placed at same position (top/middle/bottom or left/center/right) as the wall. Check Example3 input: G B M ... [3220 chars truncated]
"The battalion advances in the direction its supply line runs, deploying three regiments along that corridor"
120b: k=4
See: A 3×3 tactical unit with one supply line — a row or column of uniform insignia.
Do: Deploy on a 9×9 battlefield of empty terrain (black). The supply line's axis sets the advance direction; its position sets the corridor. Station three copies of the unit along that corridor.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 black terrain with three copies of the input tiled along the supply line's corridor.
We need to understand the transformation rule. We have 3x3 input, output 9x9. The description: "3×3 tactical unit with one supply line — a row or column of uniform insignia. Deploy on a 9×9 battlefield of empty terrain (black). The supply line's axis sets the advance direction; its position sets the corridor. Station three copies of the unit along that corridor." Interpretation: Input 3x3 contains a row or column where all three cells are the same color (uniform). That is the "supply line". The axis (row vs column) determines direction (horizontal vs vertical). Its position (which row/col) determines where the corridor is placed in the 9x9 output. Then we place three copies of the 3x3 unit along that corridor (i.e., tiled along that axis) within the 9x9, leaving other cells black (.). So output is 9x9 with three 3x3 blocks placed in a line (either horizontally across rows or vertically across columns) aligned with the uniform row/col. Let's verify with examples. Example1 Input: B B B M R R R R M Uniform row? First row all B. That's a row uniform. So axis is horizontal (row). Position is row 0 (top). Corridor: we place three copies of the unit along that row direction? Actually we need to tile horizontally across columns? Let's see output: first three rows (0-2) contain pattern: first row: B B B B B B B B B (9 cells). That's three copies of first row (BBB) repeated horizontally across 9 columns. Second row: M R R M R R M R R (pattern of second row repeated). Third row: R R M R R M R R M (third row repeated). So we have three copies placed side by side horizontally, occupying rows 0-2, columns 0-8. The rest rows 3-8 are all black. So corridor is rows 0-2 (height 3) placed at top (since uniform row is top). So we tile horizontally (i.e., repeat across columns). That matches. Example2 Input: R Y G R G Y R G Y Uniform column? Let's see columns: first column all R (R,R,R). That's uniform column. So axis vertical. Position column 0 (leftmost). Output: we see pattern repeated vertically downwards: first column block of 3 rows repeated three times downwards? Let's examine output: first three rows (0-2) are the original 3x3 placed at leftmost columns 0-2? Actually output rows 0-2: "R Y G . . . . . ." etc. So the 3x3 appears at top-left corner (rows0-2, cols0-2). Then rows3-5: "R Y G . . . . . ." etc. That's a copy placed directly below the first copy (rows3-5). Then rows6-8: another copy (rows6-8). So three copies stacked vertically, occupying columns 0-2, rows 0-8. The rest columns 3-8 are black. So corridor is columns 0-2 (width 3) placed at leftmost (since uniform column is leftmost). So we tile vertically (repeat downwards). Example3 Input: G B M G M B G B M Uniform column? Let's check columns: first column all G (G,G,G). Yes uniform column leftmost. Output: similar to example2: three copies stacked vertically, leftmost columns. Indeed output rows0-2 same as input, rows3-5 same, rows6-8 same. So matches. Example4 Input: Y Y M ... [3189 chars truncated]
"The ensemble takes the stage in the wing where the spotlight bar hangs — one unbroken beam shows them where to stand in triplicate"
120b: k=4
See: A 3×3 cast arrangement containing one spotlight bar — a row or column of identical light.
Do: On a 9×9 darkened stage (black), the spotlight bar's orientation and position pick the wing. Place three copies of the cast arrangement along that wing.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 dark stage with three copies of the input tiled in a strip at the spotlight bar's position.
We need to infer rule. From description: 3x3 input, find a "spotlight bar" — a row or column of identical light (i.e., a row or column where all three cells are same color). Then on 9x9 black grid, place three copies of the input tiled along that wing (i.e., along that row or column position). Let's examine examples. Example1 input: B B B M R R R R M We see first row is all B (identical). That's a row of identical light. So spotlight bar is row 0 (top). Output: 9x9 grid with three copies of input placed in a strip at that position. Output shows first three rows are copies? Let's see output rows: Row0: B B B B B B B B B (that's three copies horizontally? Actually each copy is 3 columns, three copies side by side yields 9 columns. Row0 is B B B repeated three times -> matches input row0 repeated horizontally. Row1: M R R M R R M R R (input row1 repeated three times). Row2: R R M R R M R R M (input row2 repeated three times). Then rows 3-8 are all '.' (black). So they placed three copies side by side horizontally, forming a 3x9 block at top rows (since spotlight bar is a row). So they tiled horizontally across columns, same rows as original (top three rows). So "wing" is horizontal wing (top). So they placed three copies left to right. Example2 input: R Y G R G Y R G Y We need to find a column of identical? Let's check columns: column0: R,R,R all same (R). So spotlight bar is column0 (leftmost). Output: 9x9 grid with three copies tiled vertically? Let's see output: first three columns? Actually output rows show pattern: first three rows are the input as is (R Y G etc) then rows 3-5 repeat same pattern, rows 6-8 repeat same pattern. Let's examine output matrix: Provided as 9 rows each with 9 entries, but they show first three rows: "R Y G . . . . . ." etc. Actually output shows first three rows contain the input pattern in first three columns, rest '.' . Then rows 3-5 also same pattern in first three columns, rows 6-8 also same. So they tiled vertically: three copies stacked top to bottom, each copy occupies rows 0-2, 3-5, 6-8, same columns (0-2). So they placed three copies vertically because spotlight bar is a column. Thus rule: Identify the row or column that is uniform (all same color). If it's a row, tile the 3x3 input horizontally across that row block (i.e., replicate three times side by side) and keep same rows (the three rows). If it's a column, tile vertically (stack three copies) keeping same columns. Example3 input: G B M G M B G B M Check columns: column0: G,G,G uniform (G). So column uniform. Output: they tiled vertically as before. Indeed output shows first three columns contain pattern repeated vertically. Example4 input: Y Y M G G G M M Y Check rows: row0: Y Y M not uniform. row1: G G G uniform (G). So row uniform at row1 (middle). Output: they placed three copies horizontally but centered at rows 3-5? Wait output shows rows 3-5 contain the tiled pattern, rows elsewhere '.' . Let's see: Output rows 0-2 are all '.' ... [6102 chars truncated]
"The garden bed is planted in triplicate along the trellis — the single-vine row tells you which direction to extend the beds"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 garden patch with one trellis line — a row or column of the same plant.
Do: Lay out a 9×9 plot of bare soil (black). The trellis line's axis and position mark where to plant. Replicate the garden patch three times along the trellis.
Grid: Input: 3×3. Output: 9×9 bare plot with three copies of the input tiled in a strip at the trellis position.
See: The input grid has a black background with a single colored rectangle drawn in one non-black color. The rectangle is defined by solid border rows at the top and bottom, and solid border columns at the left and right, forming a grid-like structure. The interior is divided into cells by internal horizontal and vertical lines of the same color, with black cells filling the spaces between the lines. The rectangle can vary in size, position, number of internal divisions, and color.
Do: Identify the rectangular structure and its top and bottom border rows. Let the bottom border row have distance d=0. For each row of the rectangle, compute d = (bottom_row - current_row). Shift the entire row's colored content horizontally according to d mod 4: if d mod 4 is 0, no shift; if d mod 4 is 1, shift left by 1; if d mod 4 is 2, no shift; if d mod 4 is 3, shift right by 1. Shifting means moving every cell in that row (both colored and the black cells between colored cells) by 1 position in the indicated direction. Vacated positions become black and content that moves fills its new position. All rows outside the rectangle remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly. The background is black (.). The colored rectangle occupies a contiguous region and is always axis-aligned. The grid is large enough that horizontal shifts of ±1 do not push content outside the grid boundaries.
"A snake slithers through a window frame, its body swaying side to side."
120b: k=4
See: Against the darkness, a colored window frame floats — a lattice of panes divided by mullions, like a church window suspended in the void. The frame is rigid and geometric, every crossbar perfectly aligned.
Do: A serpentine wave passes through the window from bottom to top. The bottom edge of the frame is anchored, but as the wave ripples upward, each horizontal bar of the lattice sways — first leaning one direction, then settling, then leaning the other way, in a steady breathing rhythm. The bars rock gently like a rope bridge swinging in the wind, each rung shifting just one step from center before swinging back. The top and bottom rails stay planted while the rows between them dance in a slow, repeating shimmy.
Grid: The dark void remains still. Only the lattice moves — its colored bars and the dark panes between them sway together as one body, like beads on a string sliding left or right. The frame never breaks apart or leaves the grid; it merely breathes sideways in place.
We need to infer rule. Observations: Input shows a rectangular frame of colored cells (X, R, A, G) forming a thick border? Actually pattern: In example1, X forms a 4x? Let's view: Input has a block of X forming a 4x? Actually rows 2-11 have X pattern: looks like a 4x? Let's think: The pattern is a "window" with vertical bars? The description: lattice of panes divided by mullions, like a church window. The frame is rigid and geometric, every crossbar perfectly aligned. The wave passes bottom to top, each horizontal bar sways left/right one step then back, alternating direction each row? The output shows the X pattern shifted horizontally in a wave pattern: rows shift left or right relative to original. Let's examine example1 more concretely. Input rows (0-index). Row2 (third row) has X X X X X X X X from col4 to col11 (8 X). Row3 has pattern: X . . X X . . X . . X (positions?). Let's index columns 0-14. Row2: cols4-11 X. Row3: col4 X, col5 ., col6 ., col7 X, col8 X, col9 ., col10 ., col11 X, col12 ., col13 ., col14 X? Wait there are 15 columns. Actually row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." So X at col4, col7, col8, col11. Row4 same as row3. Row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as row2. Row6: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as row3. Row7 same. Row8 same as row2. Row9 same as row3. Row10 same as row3. Row11 same as row2. So pattern is a grid of X forming a 4x? Actually it's like a 4x? The pattern resembles a "window" with vertical bars? But anyway. Output: Row2 becomes ". . . X X X X X X X X . . .". So the block of X shifted left by 1 column (starting at col3). Row3 unchanged? Output row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row3. Row4: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." This is shifted right? Let's compare input row4 same as row3. Output row4 has X at col5? Actually output row4: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." So X at col5, col8,9,12. That's like original row3 shifted right by 1? Original row3 had X at col4,7,8,11. Shift right gives col5,8,9,12 matches. So row4 shifted right. Row5 (input row5 same as row2) output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." unchanged? Actually output row5 same as input row5 (starting at col4). So pattern: rows alternate shift left, none, right, none? Let's list: Rows with full horizontal bar (row2,5,8,11) maybe shift left on row2, unchanged on row5? Wait row5 output same as input (col4). Row8 output ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." shift right? Actually output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." That's shift right by 1 (starting col5). Row11 output same as input? Row11 output ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." unchanged. So pattern across rows: Starting from bottom? The description says wave from bottom to top, each horizontal bar sways first leaning one direction, then settling, then leaning other way, in a steady breathing rhythm. So maybe the rows of the lattice (horizontal bars) move left, then stay, then right, then stay, repeating as you go up. Let's examine example2 with R pattern. Input ... [10703 chars truncated]
"A ribcage breathes — as each rib rises from the diaphragm, it rocks gently left, then center, then right, then center again, the bones swaying in a cycle with each breath."
120b: fail
See: A skeleton of colored bone forms a cage of ribs against dark tissue. Horizontal bands of bone alternate with dark gaps of flesh between them.
Do: The ribcage inhales. Each rib sways according to how far it sits from the diaphragm at the base — some nudge left, some nudge right, some hold still, repeating in a four-beat respiratory rhythm climbing upward.
Grid: Grid dimensions unchanged. The dark background is tissue. The colored framework is bone. The cage structure remains intact but its ribs have shifted in their sockets.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with background '.' (black). There is a "cage" of colored bone: in example1 color X (grey). Input shows a pattern: a rectangular block of X forming a shape like multiple horizontal bars? Let's view. Example1 Input: rows 0-14 (15x15). The pattern appears in columns 4-11 (0-index?). Actually there is a block of X forming a shape of ribs: looks like a 3x? Let's map. Rows 2-12 have X pattern. Row2: columns 4-11 all X (8). Row3: pattern: col4 X, col5 ., col6 ., col7 X, col8 X, col9 ., col10 ., col11 X. Row4 same as row3. Row5: full row of X columns4-11. Row6 similar to row3 but with X at col4, col7,8, col11? Actually row6: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as row3. Row7 same. Row8 full row. Row9 same as row3. Row10 same. Row11 full row. So pattern is like alternating full rows of X and rows with three X groups: leftmost single, middle double, rightmost single? Actually row3 pattern: X . . X X . . X. That's left single at col4, double at col7-8, single at col11. So three groups. Now output: The pattern shifted? Let's compare output rows. Output row2 (index2): ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." So full row of X shifted left? In input row2 had X from col4-11 (8). Output row2 has X from col3-11? Actually count: there are 9 X? Let's count: positions: col3? Let's index: row2 output: columns 3-11 inclusive? That's 9 X. Input had 8 X from col4-11. So shifted left by 1 and extended one more? Row3 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row3? Input row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." identical. Row4 output: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." This is different: input row4 same as row3. Output row4 has leftmost X moved right one? Actually output row4: at col5 X (instead of col4). So shift right? Row5 output: full row same as input row5? Input row5 full X col4-11. Output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input row5 (full). Row6 output: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." This is like input row6 but leftmost X moved left? Input row6 had X at col4. Output row6 has X at col3. Row7 output same as input row7. Row8 output: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." Input row8 full row col4-11. Output row8: X from col5-12? Actually count: there are 9 X from col5-12? Let's count: row8 output: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." That's 9 X starting at col5. So shift right by 1. Row9 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row9. Row10 output: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." left shift. Row11 output: full row same as input row11? Input row11 full col4-11. Output row11: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input. So pattern: rows that are full rows of X (the "ribs") shift left or right depending on distance from center? Actually they alternate shift direction: row2 shifted left, row5 unchanged, row8 shifted right, row11 unchanged? Wait row5 unchanged, row11 unchanged. Row2 left, row8 right. Row6 left, row10 left? Actually row6 left, row10 left. Hmm. Let's examine example2 with colo ... [11372 chars truncated]
"Gravitational lensing warps the image of a distant grid-like nebula — the bottom edge stays true, but each band of light above it refracts in a four-band oscillation: true, left, true, right."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colored rectangular nebula of banded light floats in dark space, its glow organized into horizontal bands and vertical columns by brighter filaments.
Do: The lowest band of the nebula image remains undistorted. Each band above refracts in a four-band lensing cycle from the bottom: no refraction, shift left, no refraction, shift right.
Grid: Space dimensions unchanged. Dark void persists. The nebula's horizontal bands have each been displaced by gravitational lensing according to their distance from the bottom edge.
"A cargo net hangs from a ship's boom — the bottom rope is taut against the deck, but each rope above swings with the ship's roll in a four-rope cycle: still, port, still, starboard."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colored cargo net forms a rectangle against the dark hull, woven from horizontal and vertical ropes of the same color with dark gaps between them.
Do: The bottom rope lies flat on deck. Each rope above swings according to a four-rope cycle measured from the bottom: hold, swing to port, hold, swing to starboard.
Grid: Hull dimensions unchanged. Dark background persists. Each horizontal rope of the net has swung laterally based on its height above the deck rope in the four-beat roll cycle.
"A signal passes through a shift register array — each row of bits processes according to its distance from the clock line at the bottom: pass through, shift left, pass through, shift right, in a four-stage cycle."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colored circuit board of horizontal bus lines and vertical traces forms a rectangle against a dark substrate, with dark cells between the traces.
Do: The bottom bus line is the clock reference. Each bus line above processes in a four-stage cycle from the clock: no shift, shift left one position, no shift, shift right one position.
Grid: Board dimensions unchanged. Dark substrate persists. Each horizontal bus line has shifted its contents laterally according to its stage distance from the clock line.
"The Tower of Babel twists as the gods confuse it — its base stands firm, but each course of bricks above wobbles in divine displeasure: steady, nudge east, steady, nudge west, in an endless heavenly cycle."
120b: k=2
See: A colored tower of brick courses and vertical columns rises from dark earth, forming a rectangular structure with dark mortar gaps.
Do: The foundation course holds fast. Each course above shifts according to divine will in a four-course cycle from the base: no shift, shift left, no shift, shift right.
Grid: Earth dimensions unchanged. Dark ground persists. Each horizontal course of the tower has been displaced laterally by the gods' cycling displeasure.
We need to infer rule. From description: "tower of brick courses and vertical columns rises from dark earth, forming a rectangular structure with dark mortar gaps." The grid has a rectangular block of colored cells (X in example1, R in example2, O in test). The block is like a tower with courses (horizontal rows) and columns. The rule: "foundation course holds fast. Each course above shifts according to divine will in a four-course cycle from the base: no shift, shift left, no shift, shift right." Interpretation: Starting from bottom of the block (foundation), that row stays same. Then next row up shifts left by one cell (maybe wrap? but seems not wrap, just shift within block). Then next row up no shift. Then next row up shift right. Then repeat cycle every 4 rows upward. Check example1: Input block of X's forms a 9x? Actually shape: rows 2-11 (0-index?). Let's examine. Input rows (0-index). Row2: " . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . " that's full row of X from col4 to col11 (8 cells). Row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." pattern. Row4 same as row3. Row5 full row again. Row6 pattern like row3. Row7 same. Row8 full row. Row9 pattern. Row10 pattern. Row11 full row. So block height 10? Actually rows 2-11 inclusive =10 rows. The pattern of full rows at rows 2,5,8,11? Let's list: row2 full, row3 pattern, row4 pattern, row5 full, row6 pattern, row7 pattern, row8 full, row9 pattern, row10 pattern, row11 full. So full rows every 3 rows? Actually pattern: full, pattern, pattern, full, pattern, pattern, full, pattern, pattern, full. That's a cycle of 3 rows: full then two pattern rows. But rule says shift left/right every 4 rows. Let's see output: In output, the block appears shifted left/right? Let's compare row2 input full at cols4-11. Output row2 (index2) is ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." So shifted left by 1 (starting at col3). Row3 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row3? Input row3 had same pattern? Input row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." Yes unchanged. Row4 output: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." Input row4: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." So shifted right by 1? Actually compare: input row4 had X at col4, pattern. Output row4 has X at col5 (shift right). Row5 output: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input row5 (full). So pattern: starting from bottom? Let's examine bottom rows: Input row11 full at col4-11. Output row11 same (full). Row10 output: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . " Input row10 pattern same? Input row10 pattern same as row3. Output row10 same as input? Actually output row10: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . " That's shift left? Wait compare: Input row10: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." (col4). Output row10: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . " (col3). So shifted left. Row9 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row9 (pattern). Row8 output: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." Input row8 full at col4-11. Output row8 shifted right? Actually output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." That's start at col5 (righ ... [11329 chars truncated]
"A chorus line performs a shimmy — feet planted on the bottom mark, each row of dancers above shifts hips in a four-count pattern: center, left, center, right, the wave traveling up through the line."
120b: k=1
See: A colored chorus line fills a rectangular formation on a dark floor, with horizontal rows of dancers separated by colored sashes and vertical colored position marks.
Do: The bottom row keeps feet planted. Each row above shimmies in a four-count cycle measured from the floor row: hold center, shift left, hold center, shift right.
Grid: Floor dimensions unchanged. Dark stage persists. Each horizontal row of dancers has shifted laterally per its position in the four-count shimmy cycle.
We need to infer rule. Input grid has a pattern of orange O forming a rectangle with border? Let's examine example 1: Input uses X (grey) pattern. Output shows X shifted laterally per row according to cycle. Let's analyze example 1: Input grid size 15x15. The pattern of X forms a shape: looks like a 8x8 block? Actually rows 2-11 have X pattern. Let's index rows 0-14. Rows with X start at row2 (index2) to row11 (index11). Within those rows, columns 4-11 have X pattern forming something like a "checkerboard"? Let's view input rows: Row2: columns4-11 all X (8 X) Row3: col4 X, col5 ., col6 ., col7 X, col8 X, col9 ., col10 ., col11 X Row4 same as row3 Row5: col4-11 all X Row6: same as row3 Row7 same as row3 Row8 all X Row9 same as row3 Row10 same as row3 Row11 all X So pattern is like a 8x8 block with a "plus" shape? Actually it's like a pattern of a "checkerboard" of 2x2? Not needed. Output: The block appears shifted left/right per row. Let's compare row2 input vs output row2 (index2). Input row2 had X from col4-11. Output row2 has X from col3-10? Actually output row2: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." Wait row2 output: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." That's columns3-10? Let's count: positions 0-14. Row2 output: at col3 X, col4 X, col5 X, col6 X, col7 X, col8 X, col9 X, col10 X, col11 X? Wait there are 8 X? Actually they show 8 X? Let's count: after three dots, there are X X X X X X X X? The string: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." That's 3 dots, then 8 X? Let's count: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 X,4 X,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 X,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 . So X from col3 to col10 inclusive (8 columns). So shifted left by 1 compared to input (col4-11). Good. Row3 input: pattern with X at col4,7,8,11. Output row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." That's same as input? Let's compare: Input row3 had X at col4,7,8,11. Output row3 has X at col4? Wait output row3: after 4 dots? Actually row3 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." That's 4 dots then X at col4? Let's index: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 X,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 X,9 .,10 .,11 X,12 .,13 .,14 . So X at col4,7,8,11 same as input (col4,7,8,11). So row3 unchanged. Row4 input same as row3. Output row4: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." Wait row4 output: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." That's shift right by 1? Let's see: X at col5,8,9,12? Actually count: after 5 dots? Let's parse: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 X,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 X,13 .,14 . So X at col5,8,9,12. Input had at col4,7,8,11. So each X shifted right by 1. So row4 shifted right. Row5 input all X col4-11. Output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." That's same as input? Wait output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." That's X from col4-11 unchanged. So row5 unchanged. Thus pattern: rows cycle: shift left, unchanged, shift right, unchanged, shift left, etc? Let's list rows 2-11 (10 rows). Row indices and shift: Row2: left Row3: unchanged Row4: right Row5: unchanged Row6: left? Let's check output row6: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." That's row6 output: after ... [7782 chars truncated]
"Tectonic creep deforms a columnar basalt formation — the base layer is locked to bedrock, but each layer above creeps in a four-layer strain cycle: locked, creep left, locked, creep right."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colored basalt formation of horizontal strata and vertical columns stands against dark country rock, with dark gaps between the columns and strata.
Do: The bottom stratum is locked to bedrock. Each stratum above undergoes tectonic creep in a four-layer cycle from the base: no creep, creep left one unit, no creep, creep right one unit.
Grid: Rock mass dimensions unchanged. Dark country rock persists. Each horizontal stratum has crept laterally according to its distance from the base in the four-layer strain cycle.
"A layered lasagna settles unevenly in the pan — each sheet of pasta, counting from the bottom, slides slightly to one side or the other as gravity and sauce redistribute its weight."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Layers of colored pasta form a rectangular dish against a dark countertop. Vertical lines of filling divide each layer into portions.
Do: Starting from the bottom layer, each sheet shifts according to a repeating four-step settling pattern: still, slide left, still, slide right. The bottom layer stays put, and the pattern cycles upward through the stack.
Grid: The dish stays the same size. The dark counter is unchanged. Each horizontal pasta layer has nudged sideways according to its position in the stack.
"A choir stands on risers, and as a wave of rhythm passes through them, each row sways — still, lean left, still, lean right — a four-beat groove rippling up from the bass section."
120b: k=1
See: Rows of colored singers stand in a rectangular formation on a dark stage, organized into sections by colored dividers.
Do: The bass row at the bottom keeps time without moving. Each row above sways according to where it falls in the four-beat measure: beat one holds, beat two leans left, beat three holds, beat four leans right, repeating up through the risers.
Grid: The stage dimensions are unchanged. Dark space surrounds the choir. Each row of singers has shifted laterally according to its rhythmic position.
We need to infer rule. Input grid has a pattern of colored region (X in example, O in test). The description: rows of colored singers stand in rectangular formation, organized into sections by colored dividers. Bass row at bottom keeps time without moving. Each row above sways according to where it falls in the four-beat measure: beat one holds, beat two leans left, beat three holds, beat four leans right, repeating up through the risers. Interpretation: We have a block of colored cells (X or O) forming a shape (maybe a rectangle with some pattern). The bottom row (bass) stays same. Rows above shift left or right depending on beat pattern: hold (no shift), left shift, hold, right shift, repeating. In example 1, input has a block of X's forming a pattern: looks like a 9x? Actually grid 15x15. The block occupies columns 4-11 (0-index?). Let's index columns 0-14. Input rows 2-11 have X pattern. Let's examine row indices (0-based). Row0-1 empty. Row2: columns 4-11 all X (8 X). Row3: pattern: col4 X, col5 ., col6 ., col7 X, col8 X, col9 ., col10 ., col11 X. Row4 same as row3. Row5: all X columns 4-11. Row6 similar to row3. Row7 same. Row8 all X. Row9 similar to row3. Row10 similar. Row11 all X. Row12-14 empty. Output: bottom rows shift? Let's compare row2 input (all X) becomes row2 output: columns 3-10 X? Actually output row2: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." So X's shifted left by 1 column (from col4-11 to col3-10). Row3 input: pattern . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . (same as input). Output row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." unchanged? Wait output row3 same as input row3? Let's check: output row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." Yes unchanged. Row4 input same as row3. Output row4: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." So shifted right by 1? Actually input row4 had X at col4,7,8,11. Output row4 has X at col5,8,9,12? Let's map: output row4: positions: col4? there is '.'; col5 X; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 X; col9 X; col10 '.'; col11 '.'; col12 X. So shift right by 1 relative to input row4 (col4->5, col7->8, col8->9, col11->12). Yes. Row5 input all X (col4-11). Output row5: same as input? Output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." unchanged (still col4-11). So hold. Row6 input pattern like row3. Output row6: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." That's shift left by 1 (col4->3, col7->6? Wait original row6: X at col4,7,8,11. Shift left gives col3,6,7,10. Output row6: X at col3,6,7,10 matches. Row7 input same as row3. Output row7 unchanged? Output row7: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." unchanged. Row8 input all X. Output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." That's shift right by 1 (col4-11 -> col5-12). Yes. Row9 input pattern like row3. Output row9 unchanged? Output row9: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." unchanged. Row10 input pattern like row3. Output row10: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." shift left. Row11 input all X. Output row11 unchanged? Output row11: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." unchanged. Thus pattern of shifts per row from ... [8782 chars truncated]
"A marching band performs a ripple drill — the bottom rank stands firm while each successive rank steps sideways in a four-count pattern, making the formation shimmer like a flag in wind."
120b: k=1
See: A colored rectangular formation of band members stands on a dark field, organized in rows and columns by colored guide markers.
Do: The bottom rank anchors. Counting upward, each rank executes a four-count drill: hold position, step left one pace, hold position, step right one pace — cycling through the pattern as ranks ascend.
Grid: Field dimensions unchanged. The dark turf surrounds the formation. Each horizontal rank has shifted laterally per its count in the four-step drill sequence.
We need to infer rule. Input and output example 1: Let's map coordinates. Input grid 15x15. There's a block of X forming a shape? Looks like a pattern of a "band" maybe a rectangle with holes? Let's examine: Input rows 3-12 (0-index?) Actually rows 0-14. Row2 (index2) has X from col4 to col11 (8 X). Row3 has X at col4, col7, col8, col11? Wait row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." So X at col4, col7, col8, col11. Row4 same as row3. Row5 full row of X from col4 to col11. Row6 similar to row3. Row7 same. Row8 full row. Row9 similar to row3. Row10 similar. Row11 full row. So pattern is like a "band" of 8 columns wide, 10 rows tall, with some missing X in certain rows (like a pattern of two columns missing? Actually rows with pattern: rows 3,4,6,7,9,10 have X at col4, col7, col8, col11 (four X). Others rows 2,5,8,11 have full 8 X. Output: The shape appears shifted horizontally per row according to a four-step cycle: hold, left, hold, right. Let's see output rows: Row2 (index2) now has X from col3 to col10 (shift left by 1). Row3 unchanged? Output row3: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row3? Actually output row3 same as input row3. Row4 output: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." This is shifted right by 1? Input row4 had X at col4,7,8,11. Output row4 has X at col5,8,9,12? Wait output row4: ". . . . . X . . X X . . X . ." So X at col5, col8, col9, col12. That's shift right by 1 relative to input row4 (col4->5,7->8,8->9,11->12). Row5 output: full row of X from col4 to col11 unchanged? Actually output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input row5 (full). Row6 output: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." That's shift left? Input row6 had X at col4,7,8,11. Output row6 has X at col3,6,7,10? Wait output row6: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." positions: col3, col6, col7, col10. That's left by 1 relative to input (col4->3,7->6,8->7,11->10). Row7 output unchanged? Output row7: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." same as input row7. Row8 output: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." shift right by 1? Input row8 full from col4-11. Output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." X from col5-12 (right shift). Row9 output: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." unchanged? Actually output row9 same as input row9. Row10 output: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." shift left. Row11 output full unchanged? Output row11: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input row11 (full). So pattern: rows follow cycle: left shift, hold, right shift, hold? Let's list rows 2-11 (10 rows). Input rows indices 2-11. Output rows: 2: left 3: hold 4: right 5: hold 6: left 7: hold 8: right 9: hold 10: left 11: hold So pattern repeats every 4 rows: left, hold, right, hold. Starting with left at row2 (the bottom rank? Actually bottom rank anchors? The description: bottom rank anchors. Counting upward, each rank executes a four-count drill: hold position, step left one pace, hold position, step right one pace — cycling through the pattern as ranks ascend. Wait descripti ... [7069 chars truncated]
"Wind shear twists a curtain of rain — the base of the storm stays anchored while each altitude band drifts sideways in a cycling pattern, warping the downpour into a wobbling column."
120b: k=1
See: A rectangular curtain of colored rain falls against a dark sky, with colored bands marking different altitude layers and vertical streams dividing the rainfall.
Do: The lowest band of rain stays grounded. Each band above drifts according to oscillating wind shear: no drift, drift left, no drift, drift right — a four-layer cycle repeating upward through the column.
Grid: Sky dimensions unchanged. The dark background is empty air. The colored rainfall retains its structure but each horizontal band has been displaced by the shear pattern.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has a pattern of X forming a shape (maybe a plus?). Output shows same shape but shifted horizontally per row according to pattern: "lowest band stays grounded. Each band above drifts according to oscillating wind shear: no drift, drift left, no drift, drift right — a four-layer cycle repeating upward through the column." Interpretation: The grid has horizontal bands of colored rain (X). The lowest band (bottommost) stays same. Then moving upward, bands shift left/right/no shift in cycle: no drift, left, no drift, right, repeat. In example, we need to see bands: Input shows multiple horizontal bands of X? Let's examine input rows (15x15). Rows 0-1 empty. Row2: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (full block of X length 12 starting col4). Row3: . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . (pattern). Row4 same as row3. Row5: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (full). Row6 similar to row3. Row7 similar. Row8 full. Row9 similar. Row10 similar. Row11 full. Row12-14 empty. So pattern appears like a repeating vertical structure: a 4-row cycle? Actually rows 2-11 contain pattern. Let's label rows index 0-14. Rows with full X: rows 2,5,8,11 (every 3 rows?). Actually difference 3. Those are "full bands". The rows in between (3,4,6,7,9,10) have partial X pattern. In output, we see shifts: Row2 (full) moved right? Output row2: . . . X X X X X X X X . . . . (full shifted left by 1? Actually original full started at col4 (0-index). Output full at col3? Let's count: Output row2: . . . X X X X X X X X . . . . . Wait there are 15 columns. Output row2: positions 0-2 '.' then X at col3 through col10 (8 X?) Actually original had 12 X from col4 to col15? Wait grid width 15 columns (0-14). Original row2: columns 4-11? Let's count: there are 12 X? The line ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." that's 4 dots, then 8 X? Actually there are 8 X? Let's count tokens: after 4 dots, we have X X X X X X X X (8) then . . . (3). So total 4+8+3=15. So full band width 8 X from col4 to col11 inclusive. Output row2: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . . ." That's 3 dots, then 8 X from col3 to col10, then 4 dots. So shifted left by 1. Row5 (original full) output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input? Let's check output row5: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." Indeed unchanged (no shift). Row8 output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." That's 5 dots then 8 X from col5 to col12? Actually shift right by 1? Input row8 full at col4-11. Output row8 at col5-12 (right 1). Row11 output row11 unchanged? Output row11: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . ." same as input. Thus pattern: starting from bottommost full band (row11) stays same (no drift). Then moving up: row8 (one band above) drifts right (+1). Row5 drifts left? Wait row5 is two bands above bottom? Actually bottommost full band is row11 (index 11). Next full band upward is row8 (index 8) which shifted right. Next is row5 (index5) shifted left? But output row5 unchanged. Hmm maybe the cycle is: bottom band no dri ... [6872 chars truncated]
"An earthquake shifts a pagoda — each floor rocks on its post, and counting from the foundation upward, the floors wobble in a four-story cycle: steady, lean left, steady, lean right."
120b: k=2
See: A colored pagoda stands against a dark landscape, its floors marked by horizontal beams and its rooms divided by vertical pillars.
Do: The foundation stays true. Each floor above displaces laterally in a repeating four-floor seismic cycle: no shift, shift left one unit, no shift, shift right one unit, measured from the base upward.
Grid: Landscape dimensions unchanged. Dark surroundings persist. The pagoda's horizontal floors have each shifted sideways according to their position in the four-beat seismic oscillation.
We need to understand transformation rule. From description: "pagoda floors shift laterally according to four-beat seismic oscillation: no shift, shift left one unit, no shift, shift right one unit, measured from the base upward." So base floor stays same, next floor shift left, next no shift, next shift right, then repeat. In examples, we need to see pattern. Example1 input: looks like a pattern of X forming a pagoda shape? Let's examine rows with X. Input rows 3-12 (0-index?). Actually grid 15x15. Input rows 2-11 have X pattern: appears like a 8x8 block of X with some holes? Let's map. Row indices (0-based): 0-1 all dots. Row2: " . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . " => columns 4-11 X. Row3: " . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . " => columns 4 X, 5-6 ., 7 X, 8 X, 9-10 ., 11 X? Wait need count: Let's index columns 0-14. Row3: positions: 0-3 ., 4 X, 5 .,6 .,7 X,8 X,9 .,10 .,11 X,12 .,13 .,14 . . So pattern. Row4 similar. Row5: " . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . " full block again. Row6 similar to row3. Row7 similar. Row8 full block. Row9 similar. Row10 similar. Row11 full block. So pattern: alternating full rows of X (solid) and rows with pattern: X . . X X . . X . . X? Actually row3 pattern: X . . X X . . X . . X (positions 4,7,8,11). Row6 same etc. Now output: rows shifted laterally per floor. Let's compare row2 (index2) input full block at columns 4-11. Output row2: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." Wait output row2: ". . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." That's columns 3-10 X (shift left by 1). Indeed base floor? Which floor is considered base? Probably bottommost floor (row11) stays same? Let's see bottom full row input row11 (index11) columns 4-11 X. Output row11: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." same as input (no shift). So bottom floor unchanged. Now row10 (index10) input pattern row similar to row3. Output row10: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." Let's compare shift? Input row10 pattern: columns 4 X,7 X,8 X,11 X. Output row10: columns 3 X,6 X,7 X,10 X? Actually output row10: ". . . X . . X X . . X . . . ." That's X at col3,6,7,10. That's shift left by 1 relative to input (col4->3,7->6,8->7,11->10). So row10 shifted left. Row9 (index9) input full block columns4-11. Output row9: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." same as input? Wait output row9: ". . . . X X X X X X X X . . . ." That's same as input (no shift). But according to pattern, after left shift, next floor no shift? Let's list from bottom upward: Bottom row index11: no shift (0) Row10: shift left (-1) Row9: no shift (0) Row8: shift right (+1) maybe? Let's check output row8 (index8) input full block. Output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." Wait output row8: ". . . . . X X X X X X X X . ." That's columns5-12 X (shift right by 1). Indeed. Row7 (index7) pattern row similar to row3. Output row7: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." That's same as input? Let's see: output row7: ". . . . X . . X X . . X . . ." That's X at col4,7,8,11 same as input (no shift). So pattern: no shif ... [9477 chars truncated]
"A shield wall buckles under pressure — the rear rank holds firm, and each rank forward warps in a four-rank cycle: hold, buckle left, hold, buckle right, creating a zigzag in the formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colored rectangular phalanx of shields stands on a dark battlefield, organized by horizontal ranks and vertical files of colored edges.
Do: The rearmost rank anchors. Counting forward from the rear, each rank deforms in a four-rank repeating pattern: hold position, shift left, hold position, shift right.
Grid: Battlefield unchanged in size. Dark ground persists. The phalanx's rows have each buckled laterally based on their distance from the rear rank.
"Stage flats on a revolving set wobble as they rotate — the bottom edge is bolted to the stage, but each horizontal slat above it twists in a four-beat pattern: still, left, still, right."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A rectangular scenic flat of colored slats stands against a dark backstage void, with horizontal and vertical colored framing dividing it into panels.
Do: The base of the flat is bolted down. Each horizontal slat above twists according to its distance from the base in a four-step cycle: no twist, twist left, no twist, twist right.
Grid: Stage dimensions unchanged. Dark backstage surrounds the flat. Each horizontal slat has displaced sideways per its position in the four-beat twist cycle.
"A trellis warps as vines grow heavy — the bottom rail stays staked, but each rail above bows under the weight in a four-rail cycle: straight, bow left, straight, bow right."
120b: k=1
See: A colored trellis of horizontal rails and vertical stakes forms a rectangle against dark soil. The spaces between rails and stakes are dark open air.
Do: The bottom rail remains staked to the ground. Each rail above bows according to a four-rail repeating pattern measured from the bottom: no bow, bow left, no bow, bow right.
Grid: Garden dimensions unchanged. Dark soil background persists. The trellis rails have each bowed laterally based on their distance from the bottom rail.
We need to infer rule. Input grid shows a rectangle of colored cells (X in example 1) inside black background. Output shows same rectangle but shifted? Let's compare. Example1 Input: rows 0-14 (15x15). The rectangle of X occupies rows 2-11 and columns 4-11 (0-index?). Actually look: Input rows 2-11 have pattern of X forming a shape: seems like a pattern of a "trellis" with vertical lines? Let's visualize: rows 2-11 each have X's in columns 4-11 (8 columns). Within that, there are some '.' inside forming pattern: It's like a pattern of a "grid" with some missing X's? Let's compare Input vs Output. Row2 (index2): Input: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (full block of X). Output row2: . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (shifted left by 1? Actually output row2 has X from col3 to col10, missing at col11? Wait count: output row2: . . . X X X X X X X X . . . . That's 3 leading dots, then 8 X, then 4 dots. Input had 4 leading dots, then 8 X, then 3 dots. So rectangle shifted left by 1 column. Row3: Input: . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . (pattern). Output row3: . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . (same as input). No shift. Row4: Input: . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . ; Output row4: . . . . . X . . X X . . X . . (shifted right? Actually output row4 has leading 4 dots then .? Let's count: output row4: . . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . That's 5 leading dots then X at col5? Input had X at col4. So shifted right by 1. Row5: Input full block again. Output row5: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (same as input? Actually same as input row5? Input row5 same as row2. Output row5 same as input row2? Wait row5 index5: Input row5: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . ; Output row5: . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (same). So no shift. Row6: Input: . . . . X . . X X . . X . . . ; Output row6: . . . X . . X X . . X . . . . (shift left? output row6 has leading 3 dots then X at col3, while input had at col4). So shift left. Row7: Input same as row6; Output row7 same as input (no shift). Row8: Input full block; Output row8: . . . . . X X X X X X X X . . . (shift right). Row9: Input same as row6; Output row9 same as input. Row10: Input same as row6; Output row10: . . . X . . X X . . X . . . . (shift left). Row11: Input full block; Output row11 same as input. Pattern: For rows that are full block (no internal holes), output sometimes shifted left or right depending on row index? Let's list row indices (starting 0). Full block rows: 2,5,8,11 (every 3 rows starting at 2). Their shifts: row2 left, row5 none, row8 right, row11 none? Actually row5 none, row11 none. Hmm. Rows with pattern (with holes) maybe shift left/right alternating? Let's examine row3 (index3) no shift, row4 shift right, row6 shift left, row7 none, row9 none, row10 shift left, etc. Not clear. Maybe rule: "Each rail above bows according to a four-rail repeating pattern measured from the bottom: no bow, bow left, no bow, bow right." So bottom rail (closest to bottom) stays same (no bow). Then moving upward, pattern repeats: no bow, left, ... [7482 chars truncated]
See: The input is a large grid (typically 30x30) with a black background. Several colors are scattered sparsely and seemingly randomly across the grid as noise pixels. Among all the colors present, exactly one color appears only in a small, compact, contiguous cluster rather than being scattered widely. This rare color forms a distinct shape, typically spanning only a few rows and columns, while every other non-black color appears many times distributed broadly across the entire grid.
Do: 1. For each non-black color in the grid, count how many disconnected pixels or small groups it forms and assess its spatial distribution. 2. Identify the one color whose pixels are all concentrated in a single small, compact region rather than scattered across the grid. This is the signal color; all other colors are noise. 3. Find the bounding box of all pixels of the signal color — the smallest rectangle that contains every pixel of that color. 4. Extract that bounding box from the grid, preserving the signal-color pixels in their positions and replacing all other cells (black or noise-colored) within the bounding box with black. 5. Output the extracted bounding box as the result.
Grid: The input grid is large (e.g., 30x30) with a black (.) background. The output grid is small, matching the dimensions of the bounding box of the signal-color cluster — typically between 3x3 and 5x5. The output contains only black (.) and the signal color.
"Finding the one bird that stayed with its flock while all others scattered in a storm."
120b: k=1
See: A vast dark night sky is filled with fireflies of various colors, each species flung far and wide by the wind — their lights blinking in lonely isolation across the expanse. But one species refused to scatter. Somewhere in the darkness, a small family of identically-colored lights huddles together, their glow forming a tiny constellation. They are the only ones who kept their formation while every other color drifted apart into solitary wandering.
Do: Search the sky for the loyal flock — the one color whose members never abandoned each other. Every other color is a diaspora, its individuals lost across the void. But this one color held hands. Once you find the huddled family, draw a frame around their gathering and lift it out of the darkness. Let the scattered loners fade away; only the constellation and the night around it remain.
Grid: The night sky is a large dark canvas sprinkled with colored sparks. The rescued constellation is a small portrait — a tight frame holding just the huddled family against the dark, no bigger than a few steps across.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small 3x3? In example output is 3 rows, 3 columns: pattern of Y and . . Let's examine example: Input contains many colors: R, Y, etc. The description: find color whose members are contiguous (huddled) while others are scattered. Then output a tight frame around that cluster, with background black? Output shows only that cluster with its colors? In example output shows Y cluster shape: a plus? Let's map: Output: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's shape of Y's cluster? In input, we need locate Y's that are together. Let's scan example input (given). Hard but we can approximate: There are Y's in rows 9-12 maybe. Let's locate Y positions: Row indices starting 0? Let's list rows with Y: Row9 (0-index?) Actually line 10: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." (row9). Contains a single Y at column 11. Row10: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." (row10) Y at columns 11,12,13. Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (row11) Y at columns 11,12. Thus Y's form a cluster of shape maybe like a small block. Let's map coordinates: row9 col11; row10 col11-13; row11 col11-12. That's shape: Row9: . Y . Row10: Y Y Y Row11: . Y Y Exactly matches output (with . for black). So rule: find color that forms a connected component (4-connected?) that is larger than 1? But other colors also have multiple cells but scattered. Need to find the only color whose cells are all adjacent (forming a single connected component) while other colors have multiple components. In example, Y appears only in that cluster (connected). R appears many scattered solitary cells. So we extract bounding box of that component and output that subgrid, with other cells turned to . (black). So output is minimal bounding rectangle containing that component, preserving its colors (Y) and turning other cells within rectangle to . (if empty). Indeed bounding box rows 9-11, cols 11-13 gives 3x3 grid as output. Thus rule: Identify the color that forms a single connected component (i.e., all its cells are connected) while all other colors have multiple components (i.e., are scattered). Then output the minimal bounding rectangle of that component, with that component's cells colored, others as . (black). If component includes other colors? Not. Now apply to test input. Need to find which color appears as a single connected cluster (all its cells connected) while other colors appear in multiple disconnected groups. Let's parse test input grid. It's 30 rows? Let's count lines: Provided 30 lines? Let's count quickly. I'll index rows 0-? Let's list each row with characters. Row0: ". . B . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . ." Row1: ". . A G . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . A . . . . . . B B ." Row2: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A A A B G . . . . . . ." Row3: ". . A . . . . . . A . . B . . . A . . . G . . G . . . . . . A" Row4: "B . . . . . . . . ... [6735 chars truncated]
"In a petri dish teeming with wandering bacteria of various strains, one colony has formed a tight biofilm while all others drift as free-floating planktonic cells. The researcher isolates and cultures only the biofilm."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vast petri dish with colored bacteria scattered everywhere. Most strains wander individually across the medium, but one strain has clustered into a dense colonial biofilm in a small patch.
Do: Identify the strain that formed a biofilm rather than dispersing. Excise the agar rectangle containing only that colony and discard the rest of the dish.
Grid: The petri dish is a large black field with colored dots. The output is the small rectangle of agar containing the biofilm colony against a clean black background.
"The night sky is full of stars from many constellations, each star seemingly alone. But one constellation's stars are bunched in an unusually tight asterism. The astronomer photographs only that formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vast sky with colored stars scattered broadly. One color of star clusters into a compact asterism while every other color is spread thinly across the heavens.
Do: Find the constellation whose stars are packed into a small region instead of being strewn across the sky. Frame the telescope's view around only that asterism.
Grid: The sky is a large dark field with colored star-dots. The telescope view is a small rectangle showing only the tight asterism.
"Flotsam from many wrecked ships drifts across the open sea. Most debris has scattered with the currents. One ship's wreckage remains lashed together as a small raft. The rescue crew recovers only that raft."
120b: fail
See: A vast ocean surface with colored flotsam drifting in every direction. One color of debris has stayed bound together in a compact mass while all others are dispersed.
Do: Identify the wreckage that held together as a raft. Haul aboard only that connected mass, leaving the scattered flotsam behind.
Grid: The ocean is a large dark surface with colored debris. The recovered raft is a small rectangle showing only the bound wreckage.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small rectangle showing only the connected mass that stayed together (raft). So we need to find which color forms a single connected component (maybe largest?) while others are scattered (multiple components). Output shows that component cropped to minimal bounding rectangle, preserving colors, other cells become '.'? In example output is 3 rows x 3 columns: pattern: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y So output contains Y (yellow) only, no other colors. So the "bound wreckage" is the color that forms a single connected mass (connected orthogonally?) while other colors are dispersed (multiple components). In input example, there are many colors: R, Y, etc. Need to see which color appears as a single connected component. Likely Y forms a cluster. Let's verify: In example input, Y appears in rows 10-13 maybe forming shape. Let's quickly scan: rows (0-index). Row9 (index9) has Y at column? row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." Actually row9 (line 10) has Y at column 11? Row10 (line 11) has Y Y Y at columns 11-13. Row11 (line12) has Y Y at columns 11-12. So Y forms a connected cluster of size maybe 6? That's the only cluster? R appears many scattered singletons and maybe some clusters but likely multiple components. So rule: find color that forms exactly one connected component (i.e., all its cells are orthogonally connected) while other colors have multiple components. Then output minimal bounding rectangle of that component, with that color cells kept, others become '.'. Check if any other color also single component? In example, maybe there is also a single R cluster? But there are many R scattered. So Y is unique. Thus for test input, we need to find which color appears as a single connected component. Colors present: B, G, A, etc. Also R appears maybe in some rows (there are R's in rows 13-15). Need to examine connectivity. We need to parse grid. Let's index rows 0-? Count lines: Provided test input has many rows. Let's count lines: I'll enumerate. 1: ". . B . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . ." 2: ". . A G . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . A . . . . . . B B ." 3: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A A A B G . . . . . . ." 4: ". . A . . . . . . A . . B . . . A . . . G . . G . . . . . . A" 5: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . B A . A . . G" 6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . A" 7: ". A . B . . . . B B . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . A A . G" 8: ". . . B A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G B . . A . . . . . . ." 9: ". . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . A . G . . . A . . G . . . ." 10: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 11: ". . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . ." 12: ". B A . . G . . . . A G . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . ." 13: ". . . B . . B . . . G . G . . . . . . . R R R . . . . . . ." 14: ". . B . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . B . . ." 15: ". . . . . ... [7862 chars truncated]
"A circuit board has components soldered everywhere, most placed individually with no clear grouping. One type of component forms a tight integrated module. The technician desolders only that module for testing."
120b: fail
See: A large circuit board with colored components scattered across its surface. One component type clusters together as a compact module while all others are isolated across the board.
Do: Find the component type that forms an integrated module rather than scattered placements. Desolder and extract just that module's footprint.
Grid: The board is a large dark grid with colored component markers. The extracted module is a small rectangle showing only the clustered components.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small rectangle showing clustered component type. In example, we need to see which color forms a compact module (cluster) while others are scattered. Output shows only that cluster, preserving relative positions? Let's analyze example. We have input grid 30x? Let's count rows: appears 30 rows (since output 3 rows). Output is 3x3 grid: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y So the clustered component type is Y (yellow). In input, there are Y's forming a cluster. Need to locate cluster and extract minimal bounding rectangle containing all Y's? Let's check input snippet: there are Y's at rows 10-13 maybe. Let's locate Y positions. I'll index rows starting 1. Row1: all . and R etc. No Y. Row2: none. Row3: none. Row4: none. Row5: none. Row6: none. Row7: none. Row8: none. Row9: none. Row10: line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at column 12? (since after 11 dots). Row10 col12 = Y. Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at cols 12,13,14. Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Y at col13,14? Wait row12: there is "Y Y" after some spaces. Actually row12: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So Y at col13 and 14? Let's count: there are 11 dots then maybe dot? Let's approximate cluster shape: rows 10-12, columns 12-14 maybe. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" no Y. Thus Y cluster is a small shape: rows 10-12, columns 12-14. Let's map: Row10: Y at col12 only. Row11: Y at col12,13,14. Row12: Y at col13,14. That shape matches output 3x3? Let's extract bounding box rows 10-12 (3 rows) and cols 12-14 (3 cols). Build subgrid: Rows: Row10 cols12-14: col12 Y, col13 ?, col14 ?. Input row10 after Y there is ". . ."? Actually row10: "... Y . . . ..." So col13 is ., col14 is . So row10: Y . . Row11 cols12-14: Y Y Y Row12 cols12-14: . Y Y? Wait row12 has Y at col13 and 14, not at col12. So col12 ., col13 Y, col14 Y. Thus subgrid: Row10: Y . . Row11: Y Y Y Row12: . Y Y But output is: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's rotated? Actually output row1 . Y . vs our row10 Y . . . So they seem to have shifted horizontally: they placed Y at middle column of first row, not leftmost. So maybe they center the cluster? Or they rotate? Let's compare shape: Our shape is like a "L" rotated? Let's draw coordinates: positions relative to top-left (0,0). Y at (0,0), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2). Output Y positions: (0,1), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2). So they moved the top-left Y from (0,0) to (0,1). So they shifted the shape right by 1 column. Why? Maybe they align cluster to have minimal bounding rectangle but also ensure that the cluster is "compact" meaning no isolated cells? Not. Maybe they extracted the cluster but also removed any empty columns/rows that are all '.'? In our bounding box, column 12 had Y at rows10,11 but not row12. Column 14 had Y at rows11,12 but not ... [11084 chars truncated]
"The gods cast colored gemstones from the heavens—each deity hurling theirs far and wide. But one god placed their stones carefully together as a small shrine. Mortals preserve only the shrine."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vast landscape covered in scattered divine gemstones of many colors. One color's stones form a compact, deliberate arrangement while all others lie randomly flung.
Do: Find the god whose offerings were placed together as a shrine rather than scattered as rain. Excavate only the shrine's footprint.
Grid: The landscape is a large dark field with colored gemstones. The excavated shrine is a small rectangle showing only the arranged offerings.
"Dancers of many troupes freestyle across an enormous ballroom floor, each spinning alone. One troupe dances in close formation—a small synchronized cluster. The choreographer spotlights only their formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vast ballroom with colored dancers scattered independently. One troupe moves in a tight group while every other dancer is isolated and dispersed.
Do: Identify the troupe dancing in formation rather than freestyle. Frame the spotlight to capture only their compact arrangement.
Grid: The ballroom is a large dark floor with colored dancer-marks. The spotlight reveals a small rectangle showing only the synchronized troupe.
"Mineral samples from many veins are scattered across an eroded landscape. Most crystals have been carried far from their source by water. One mineral remains as a compact, unweathered outcrop. The geologist maps only that outcrop."
120b: fail
See: A vast terrain with colored mineral grains distributed widely by erosion. One mineral type persists as a dense, localized outcrop while all others have been dispersed.
Do: Find the mineral that stayed as a coherent outcrop rather than being scattered by erosion. Map the bounding rectangle of only that formation.
Grid: The terrain is a large dark surface with colored mineral grains. The geological map is a small rectangle showing only the intact outcrop.
We need to infer rule from example. Input large grid with many colors, output small grid showing bounding rectangle of the "dense localized outcrop" i.e., the color that remains clustered while others are scattered. We need to find which color appears in a dense cluster (maybe contiguous region) while other colors are scattered sparsely. Then output the minimal bounding rectangle containing only that cluster, preserving colors? In example, output is 3x3 grid with Y and .? Let's examine example. We have input grid (size maybe 30x30). Output is: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y So output contains Y and . only. So the "outcrop" color is Y (yellow). In input, there are Y cells forming a cluster? Let's check input snippet: there are Y's at rows 10-13 etc. Let's locate Y positions: In example input lines (I'll index rows starting 1). Row10: "... Y ..." row10 column? line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." Actually row10: after many dots, there is Y at column 12? Row11: "... Y Y Y ..." row11 columns 12-14 maybe. Row12: "... Y Y ..." row12 columns 12-13? So cluster of Y forms shape maybe like output shape. Indeed output shape matches cluster shape: a 3x3 region with Y's in certain pattern. Thus rule: Identify the color that forms the most dense cluster (largest connected component?) and output its minimal bounding rectangle, with that color cells kept, others turned to . (black). In output, only Y and . appear. Check if any other color also forms cluster? There are many R scattered, B etc. Y cluster seems contiguous and relatively dense. Thus for test input, we need to find which color forms a dense localized outcrop (largest connected component maybe). Then output its bounding rectangle with that color and . elsewhere. We need to parse test input grid (size?). Let's count rows: Provided lines from ". . B . G . A ..." to last line ". . A . . . . A . . . . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . G". Let's count rows: I'll enumerate. 1: ". . B . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . ." 2: ". . A G . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . A . . . . . . B B ." 3: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A A A B G . . . . . ." 4: ". . A . . . . . . A . . B . . . A . . . G . . G . . . . . A" 5: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . B A . A . . G" 6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . A" 7: ". A . B . . . . B B . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . A A . G" 8: ". . . B A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G B . . A . . . . . . ." 9: ". . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . A . G . . . A . . G . . . ." 10: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 11: ". . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . ." 12: ". B A . . G . . . . A G . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . ." 13: ". . . B . . B . . . G . G . . . . . . . R R R . . . . . . ." 14: ". . B . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . B . . ." 15: ". . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . . . . ." 16: ". . . G . . . . . . . . B . . . . G ... [4461 chars truncated]
"Spices have been flung across the kitchen counter in a chaotic mise en place gone wrong. But one ingredient was placed deliberately—a careful pinch arranged in a small mound. The chef plates only what was intentional."
120b: fail
See: A broad countertop dusted with various colored spice grains thrown haphazardly. One spice sits in a neat, deliberate cluster while all others are scattered like confetti.
Do: Find the spice that was placed with intent rather than accident. Scoop up only that small arranged portion onto a tiny plate, leaving the mess behind.
Grid: The counter is a large dark surface with colorful grains. The plate is a small grid showing only the intentionally placed spice against a clean surface.
We need to infer rule from examples. Example1 input large grid with many colors; output is small 3x3? Actually output shows 3 rows, each with 3 columns: ". Y .", "Y Y Y", ". Y Y". So output is a small pattern of Y (yellow) extracted. Observation: In input, there is a cluster of Y's maybe forming shape. Need to locate the "intentional cluster". The description: one spice sits in a neat, deliberate cluster while all others are scattered like confetti. So we need to find the color that forms a compact cluster (maybe contiguous) and output that cluster isolated on minimal bounding box, with background as '.' (black). Output shows Y cluster shape. Thus rule: Identify the color that appears in a contiguous region (maybe rectangular or shape) that is more dense than others? In example1, there are Y's in input: scanning lines: there are Y's at rows 9-12 etc. Let's map approximate positions: Input lines (index starting 0). Row9 (0-index?) Actually row numbers: Let's count: Provided 30 rows? Not needed. Y's appear in a block: rows 9-12 columns around 12-14 maybe forming shape: Row9: "... Y ..." row10: "Y Y Y" row11: "Y Y" etc. Output matches that shape: . Y . ; Y Y Y ; . Y Y . Wait output 3x3: row0: . Y . ; row1: Y Y Y ; row2: . Y Y . Actually output row2: ". Y Y". That's 3 columns: . Y Y. So shape: coordinates: (0,1), (1,0)(1,1)(1,2), (2,1)(2,2). That's like a cluster of 6 Y's. In input, Y's likely exactly those positions relative to each other. So rule: find the color that forms the most compact cluster (maybe smallest bounding box area relative to count) and output that cluster trimmed to bounding box. Check example2: Output is 5 rows x 3 columns? Actually output lines: "G G .", "G G G", "G . G", "G G G", ". G G". That's 5 rows, 3 columns. So shape of G's cluster. In input, there are many G's scattered but also a cluster of G's maybe forming that shape. Let's verify: Input includes G's at rows 10-14 etc. Likely a cluster of G's forming shape of 5x3 with some missing cells (dots). Output shows that shape. Thus rule: Identify the color that appears in a cluster that is not random but forms a contiguous region (maybe 4-connected) with shape not rectangular (some holes). Output that region trimmed. But there may be multiple colors with clusters; need to pick the one that is "intentional" meaning maybe the only color that appears more than once in a contiguous block? In example1, Y appears 6 times contiguous; other colors like R appear many scattered but not contiguous? R appears many isolated. So Y is the only color with adjacency >1? Actually there may be other colors with adjacency but maybe not as dense. In example2, G appears many times in cluster; other colors B, X, etc scattered. So G is the cluster. Thus algorithm: Find the color (excluding '.' maybe) that has the largest connected component size? In example1, Y component size 6; maybe other colors have larger components? Let's check R maybe many but maybe not connected. Could there be a l ... [8062 chars truncated]
"An orchestra is warming up—every musician playing random notes in isolation, filling the hall with cacophony. But one small section is already playing together in tight harmony. The conductor spotlights only that section."
120b: fail
See: A concert hall full of scattered, dissonant notes from many instruments. One small ensemble plays in close formation while every other player is isolated and dispersed.
Do: Listen for the section playing in ensemble rather than soloing randomly. Frame just that group on stage and silence the rest.
Grid: The hall is a large dark space with colored sound-dots. The spotlight reveals a small stage showing only the harmonious ensemble.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many colors; output is small 3x3? In example output shows 3 rows, each with 3 entries: ". Y .", "Y Y Y", ". Y Y". So output is a minimal bounding box around something? The description: "small ensemble plays in close formation while every other player is isolated and dispersed. Frame just that group on stage and silence the rest." So find cluster of same color that is tightly packed? In example input, many colors: R, Y, etc. Output shows only Y's and '.' (black). So the ensemble is Y cluster. Need to locate Y cluster that is dense? Let's examine example input to see Y positions. Let's parse roughly: rows 1-30? Actually input lines 30? Let's locate Y's. I'll copy first few rows with Y: Row 10 (0-index?) line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at column 12 (1-index?). Row 11: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at columns 12,13,14. Row 12: ". . . R . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Y at columns 12,13. So cluster of Y's forms a shape: a 3x3 block maybe? Let's map coordinates: rows 10-12 (0-index maybe). Row10: single Y at col12. Row11: three Y at col12-14. Row12: two Y at col12-13. That's like a small cluster. Output shows pattern: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's 3 rows x3 cols. Let's map output pattern: row0: . Y . (center column Y). row1: Y Y Y (full). row2: . Y Y (right two Y). This matches the cluster shape? Let's see original cluster: coordinates relative: Let's set origin at top-left of bounding box of Y's. Find min row = row10, min col = col12. Then positions: (row10, col12) => relative (0,0) Y (row11, col12) => (1,0) Y (row11, col13) => (1,1) Y (row11, col14) => (1,2) Y (row12, col12) => (2,0) Y (row12, col13) => (2,1) Y So relative positions: (0,0), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1). That's shape: Row0: Y . . Row1: Y Y Y Row2: Y Y . But output is . Y . / Y Y Y / . Y Y. That's rotated or mirrored? Let's compare: Our shape rotated 90? If we rotate our shape 90 clockwise: original matrix 3x3 (with missing cells). Let's create 3x3 grid with coordinates (r,c): r0: c0 Y, c1 ., c2 . r1: Y Y Y r2: Y Y . Now rotate 90 cw: new r0 = original column0 reversed? Actually rotation cw: new[r][c] = original[2-c][r]. Compute: new r0 c0 = original[2-0][0]=original[2][0]=Y new r0 c1 = original[2-1][0]=original[1][0]=Y new r0 c2 = original[2-2][0]=original[0][0]=Y => row0 Y Y Y But output row0 . Y . not match. Maybe output is the cluster after removing isolated cells? Wait output includes Y at positions (0,1),(1,0-2),(2,1,2). That's shape like a "L" rotated? Let's map original cluster shape maybe we mis-located. Let's double-check original Y positions: Row10 (index 9) had Y at column 12? Actually row10 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at column 12 (1-index). Row11 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." Y at columns 12,13,14. Row12 lin ... [10674 chars truncated]
"After the whistle, players from several teams mill about the field aimlessly. One team's players have already huddled together for a play call. The camera zooms into just that huddle."
120b: fail
See: A vast playing field with jersey colors scattered in every direction. Most players wander alone, but one team's members have gathered into a tight huddle.
Do: Find the team that formed a huddle instead of dispersing. Zoom the camera to frame only that huddle, cropping everything else out.
Grid: The field is a large dark pitch with colored jerseys. The broadcast frame is a small rectangle showing only the huddled team on a dark background.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid with many colors, output is small 3x3? In example output shows 3 rows, each with 3 entries: ". Y .", "Y Y Y", ". Y Y". So output is a cropped region containing the "huddle" of a particular color (team). In description: find team that formed a huddle instead of dispersing. Zoom to frame only that huddle, cropping everything else out. So we need to identify which color forms a cluster (connected component) that is more dense? In example input, many colors: R, Y, etc. Output shows only Y's and '.' background. So the huddled team is Y (yellow). The output shows a minimal bounding rectangle around the Y cluster, with '.' elsewhere (background black). Let's verify: In example input, there are Y's at certain positions. Let's locate Y cluster: scanning lines: row 10 (0-index?) Actually lines: row 10 (starting from 1) has "... Y . . . . . . . . . . R ..." etc. Row 11 has "... Y Y Y ..." Row 12 has "... Y Y ..." So appears a cluster of Y's roughly 3x3 shape. The output matches that cluster: a 3x3 bounding box containing Y's and '.' where no Y. So rule: find the color that appears in a contiguous cluster (connected orthogonally? maybe 8-direction) that is larger than any other clusters? Or maybe the only color that appears more than once in a compact region while other colors are scattered singly. In description: "Most players wander alone, but one team's members have gathered into a tight huddle." So we need to find the color that has multiple adjacent cells (forming a cluster) while other colors are isolated (singletons). Then output the minimal bounding rectangle of that cluster, with that color kept, other cells turned to '.' (black). The background is black '.'. Thus for test input, we need to find which color forms a cluster (multiple adjacent cells). Let's parse test grid. It's 30 rows? Let's count lines: Provided test input lines (starting after "Test Input:"): 1: ". . B . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . ." 2: ". . A G . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . A . . . . . . B B ." 3: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A A A B G . . . . . ." 4: ". . A . . . . . . A . . B . . . A . . . G . . G . . . . . A" 5: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . . . . . B A . A . . G" 6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . A" 7: ". A . B . . . . B B . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . A A . G" 8: ". . . B A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G B . . A . . . . . . ." 9: ". . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . A . G . . . A . . G . . . ." 10: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 11: ". . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . ." 12: ". B A . . G . . . . A G . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . ." 13: ". . . B . . B . . . G . G . . . . . . . R R R . . . . . . ." 14: ". . B . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . B . . ." 15: ". . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . . . . ." 16: ". . . G . . . . . . . . B . . . . G . . R R R . A G . . . ." 17 ... [8031 chars truncated]
"After a storm shatters clouds across the sky, most droplets become scattered mist. But one cloud reforms—a small, dense cumulus among the haze. The satellite crops its image to track only that cloud."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A wide sky filled with scattered colored vapor from many dispersed cloud types. One type has condensed back into a small, compact cloud formation.
Do: Identify the cloud type that reconvened rather than remaining as scattered mist. Crop the satellite image to just its bounding area.
Grid: The sky is a large dark field with colored vapor dots. The cropped image is a small rectangle showing only the reformed cloud.
"After an earthquake, building materials lie strewn across the city. Most materials are scattered rubble, but one type remains standing as an intact small structure. The surveyor maps only what survived."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vast cityscape littered with colored debris in every direction. One material still stands as a compact, coherent structure while everything else is scattered ruins.
Do: Find the material that held together as a structure instead of becoming rubble. Draw the survey boundary around only that surviving structure.
Grid: The city is a large dark grid with colored debris. The survey map is a small rectangle showing only the intact structure.
"After a rout, soldiers from many regiments flee in all directions. One unit holds formation—a small squad maintaining discipline. The general sends orders only to that unit."
120b: fail
See: A vast battlefield with uniformed figures of many colors scattered chaotically. One regiment's soldiers remain in tight formation while all others have broken ranks.
Do: Identify the unit that held formation. Extract their position from the battle map as a small tactical overlay.
Grid: The battlefield is a large dark map with colored soldier markers. The tactical overlay is a small rectangle showing only the disciplined unit.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid (maybe 30x30). Output is small rectangle showing "unit that held formation". In example, output is 3 rows x 3 columns? Actually output shown: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's 3 rows, 3 columns? Let's count: first row ". Y ." (3). second "Y Y Y" (3). third ". Y Y" (3). So 3x3. In input example, we need find a cluster of same color that is in tight formation (maybe a rectangle of same color). The output shows that cluster extracted. Look at example input: many colors: R, Y, etc. Output shows Y's pattern. So the disciplined unit is Y cluster. Let's locate Y in input. Scan input lines (given). Let's reconstruct approximate positions. Input lines (30 rows?). Let's index rows. I'll copy example input rows (I'll number). Provided earlier: Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . R R . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row3: "R . . . . . . R . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row4: "R . R . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . R . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row7: ". . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . R . ." Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." Row10: ". . . . . . . R . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . ." Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . ." Row12: ". . . R . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row13: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" Row15: ". . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row16: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row17: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . R . . . ." Row18: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R ." Row19: ". R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row20: ". . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R ." Row21: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . ." Row22: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row23: ". . R . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row24: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row25: ". . . . R . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row26: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row27: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R . . R . . . . . . . ." Row28: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . ." Row29: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row30: (maybe none) Actually output grid is 3x3. We need to locate Y cluster. In rows 10-12 there are Y's forming shape: Row10 col? Let's index columns 1-30. Row10: ". . . . . . . R . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . ... [7241 chars truncated]
"Stagehands have left props from a dozen different plays scattered across the theater. But the props for tonight's scene are still arranged together on a small set piece. The director keeps only that arrangement."
120b: fail
See: A huge stage cluttered with colored props thrown everywhere from many productions. One set of props remains carefully arranged in a compact tableau.
Do: Find the props that are staged rather than stray. Isolate that small set piece and strike everything else.
Grid: The stage is a large dark space with colored prop-marks. The set piece is a small grid preserving only the arranged props.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid with many colored cells. Output is small grid (3x3) containing Y and . pattern. Let's examine example 1: Input grid size? Looks like 30x30 maybe. Output is 3x3 with Y pattern: rows: ". Y ." "Y Y Y" ". Y Y" So output seems to be the minimal bounding box containing a particular color? In input, there are Y cells (yellow). Let's locate Y positions in example input. We need to parse quickly: In example input lines, I see Y in rows 10-13 etc. Let's note coordinates (row index starting 0). Row 9 (0-index?) Actually line numbers: Let's count lines: Provided input lines (30 lines). Let's index rows 0-29. Row0: many . and R etc, no Y. Row1: none. Row2: none. Row3: none. Row4: none. Row5: none. Row6: none. Row7: none. Row8: none. Row9: line: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." So Y at column 11? (0-index). Row9. Row10: ". . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." Y at columns 11,12,13. Row11: ". . . R . . . . . . . . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Y at columns 11,12. Row12: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" no Y. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" no Y. Row14: ". . . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." no Y. Rows after maybe none. So Y cluster forms shape: coordinates: (9,11) (10,11),(10,12),(10,13) (11,11),(11,12) That's a shape of 6 cells forming a small cluster. Output 3x3 with Y pattern: Let's map bounding box of Y cluster: min row =9, max row=11 => height 3 rows (9,10,11). min col=11, max col=13 => width 3 columns (11,12,13). So bounding box 3x3. Within that box, Y cells pattern: Rows relative: row9: col11 Y, col12 ., col13 . row10: col11 Y, col12 Y, col13 Y row11: col11 Y, col12 Y, col13 . Thus pattern: Y . . Y Y Y Y Y . But output is: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's different orientation/rotation? Let's compare: Output pattern seems like original pattern rotated 90 degrees? Let's rotate original 90 clockwise: Original matrix: [ [Y,.,.], [Y,Y,Y], [Y,Y,.] ] Rotate 90 cw => new rows: [ [Y,Y,Y], [.,Y,.], [.,Y,Y] ]? Let's compute: matrix a[i][j] where i row, j col. Rot cw: b[j][n-1-i] = a[i][j]. For 3x3, result: Row0 (j=0): b[0][2] = a[0][0]=Y; b[0][1]=a[1][0]=Y; b[0][0]=a[2][0]=Y => row0 = [Y,Y,Y] (col0..2). Row1 (j=1): b[1][2]=a[0][1]=.; b[1][1]=a[1][1]=Y; b[1][0]=a[2][1]=Y => row1 = [Y,Y,.]? Wait order: b[1][0]=a[2][1]=Y, b[1][1]=a[1][1]=Y, b[1][2]=a[0][1]=. => row1 = [Y,Y,.]. Row2 (j=2): b[2][2]=a[0][2]=.; b[2][1]=a[1][2]=Y; b[2][0]=a[2][2]=. => row2 = [.,Y,.]? Actually b[2][0]=a[2][2]=., b[2][1]=a[1][2]=Y, b[2][2]=a[0][2]=. => row2 = [.,Y,.]. So rotated cw gives: Y Y Y Y Y . . Y . Not match. Rotate 90 ccw: Should give: . Y Y Y Y Y . . Y? Let's compute quickly: ccw result matrix = transpose then reverse rows. Original: Y . . Y Y Y Y Y . Transpose: Y Y Y . Y Y . Y . Reverse rows (swap first and last): . Y . . Y Y Y Y Y? Not match. Out ... [9719 chars truncated]
"Seeds of many varieties were scattered by wind across a wild meadow. Most germinated as lone volunteers far apart. One variety took root together in a tight patch. The gardener transplants only that cluster."
120b: fail
See: A broad meadow with colored seedlings scattered at random. One flower variety grows in a dense, compact patch while all others are widely dispersed individuals.
Do: Identify the variety that grew as a cluster rather than as scattered volunteers. Dig up the rectangular sod containing only that patch.
Grid: The meadow is a large dark field with colored seedlings. The transplanted sod is a small rectangle with only the clustered variety.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small 3x3? In example output is 3 rows, each with 3 cells: pattern shows Y cluster. Input had many colors; need find which color forms a dense compact patch (cluster) vs scattered. Then output rectangle containing only that patch, presumably minimal bounding rectangle of that cluster, with colors preserved? In output only Y appears, others omitted (maybe replaced with .). Output shows . Y . / Y Y Y / . Y Y . Wait output given: . Y . Y Y Y . Y Y That's 3x3 with Y and . . So cluster of Y in input? Let's examine example input: many Y's appear in rows 10-13 maybe forming a cluster. Let's locate Y positions: Row indices starting 0? Let's quickly scan: rows 9-12 (0-index). Row9: "... Y ...". Row10: "... Y Y Y ...". Row11: "... Y Y ...". So cluster of Y forms shape maybe 3x3 with some missing. The output matches that shape exactly, cropping to bounding rectangle of Y cluster, and other colors replaced with . (black). So rule: find color that appears as a dense compact patch (i.e., multiple adjacent cells forming a cluster) while other colors are scattered (isolated). Extract minimal rectangle containing all cells of that color, output that rectangle with that color kept, other cells become . (black). That matches. Thus for test input, we need to find which color forms a dense compact patch. Let's examine test grid (size maybe 30x30). Need to scan for clusters. Colors: B, G, A, R, Y? Y not present maybe. Look for any color that appears in a dense region. Let's note occurrences. I'll parse rows quickly (I'll index rows 0-?). Row0: ". . B . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . ." Positions: B at col2, G at col4, A at col6, G at col? after many dots col? there is G at col? after many . then G at col? let's count: after 20? Hard. But cluster likely of B maybe? Let's scan later rows for many B close together. Row6: ". A . B . . . . B B . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . A A . G" Here B at col3, B at col8, B at col9 (adjacent). That's a small cluster of B (two adjacent). Row12: ". . . B . . B . . . G . G . . . . . . . R R R . . . . . . ." Row13: ". . B . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . B . . ." Row14: ". . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . . . . R R . R . . . . . . ." Row15: ". . . G . . . . . . . . B . . . . G . . R R R . A G . . . ." Row16: "B . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row17: ". . . . . . . . . . B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row18: ". . . . A . . . . G . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row19: ". . A . . . . . G . . . . . . . . A G . . . G . . . . . . . G" Row20: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . G . . . . . . . . . . ." Row21: ". . . . . . . . G . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . B . . . ." Row22: ". . . . . . A . . . . . G . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G" Row23: ". . . . . . . . . . B . . . G . G . B . . G . . . . A . . ." Row24: ". . . . . . A . A . . B B B . . . A . . . . . . . B . . . ." Row25: ". A . . . . . ... [9426 chars truncated]
See: The grid has an orange (O) background. Vertical bars of a single non-orange color occupy every other column (odd-indexed columns: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, …). Each bar is anchored to the bottom row and extends upward for some height. Different bars have different colors and different heights. Even-indexed columns (0, 2, 4, …) are entirely orange and serve as separators.
Do: 1. Identify all vertical bars on odd-indexed columns. For each bar, record its color and its height (number of consecutive non-orange cells from the bottom up). 2. List the bars in order from left to right. 3. Rotate the sequence of colors one position to the RIGHT (the rightmost bar's color wraps around to become the leftmost bar's color). 4. Simultaneously rotate the sequence of heights one position to the LEFT (the leftmost bar's height wraps around to become the rightmost bar's height). 5. Redraw the grid: assign each bar position its new color and new height, filling from the bottom up, with all remaining cells orange.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly (same number of rows and columns). The background color is orange (O). Bars exist only on odd-indexed columns (1, 3, 5, …), and even-indexed columns remain entirely orange. Each bar is a contiguous vertical stripe of one color anchored to the bottom edge.
"Musical chairs at a costume party — everyone moves one seat right but leaves their shadow behind."
120b: k=1
See: Against a sunset-orange ballroom floor, costumed dancers stand in evenly spaced lanes, each wearing a single vivid color. Some dancers are tall, some short — their heights tell you how long they've been dancing. They stand rooted to the floor's edge, stretching upward like flames of different lengths, separated by empty aisles of orange light.
Do: The music stops and the dancers play a strange double game. Each dancer strips off their costume and tosses it one partner to the right — the dancer at the far end throws theirs all the way to the front of the line, like a boomerang. But their shadows — the silhouettes they cast on the wall — slide the opposite way, each shadow stretching to fill the space one partner to the left, with the frontmost shadow wrapping to the back. When the music resumes, each lane now wears a borrowed costume at a borrowed height: someone else's color, someone else's stature.
Grid: The ballroom keeps its exact dimensions. The orange floor fills every even lane and all the empty air above the dancers. The dancers only ever stand in the odd lanes, rooted to the bottom edge, rising upward in solid columns of color. After the swap, every lane still has exactly one costumed figure — but the colors and heights have been reshuffled as if the party spun like a carousel.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid: 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's map. Represent coordinates: rows top to bottom, columns left to right. Input example1 grid (I'll index). Let's write rows: 1: O O O O O O O O O 2: O O O O O M O O O 3: O O O O O M O O O 4: O O O O O M O O O 5: O O O O O M O O O 6: O O O O O M O O O 7: O O A O M O B O 8: O W O A O M O B O 9: O W O A O M O B O Wait rows 7-9 have fewer columns? Actually they have 9 columns: row7: O O A O M O B O (that's 8?) Let's count: "O O A O M O B O" = 8 entries. Something off. Maybe spaces misaligned. Let's reconstruct from description: The pattern likely: columns: 1-9. The input likely has orange floor in even columns (2,4,6,8) and black '.' in odd columns? But example uses O for orange floor, and other colors for dancers in odd columns. In example, there are columns with O and other colors. Let's examine column pattern: In rows 2-6, there is a vertical column of M at column6? Actually row2: O O O O O M O O O => M at column6 (even). But dancers should be in odd columns only. However M appears in even column (6). Hmm maybe orange floor is even rows? Wait description: orange floor fills every even lane and all empty air above dancers. Dancers only stand in odd lanes, rooted to bottom edge, rising upward in solid columns of color. So lanes = columns? Even lanes (columns) are orange O throughout. Odd lanes have vertical columns of colors (maybe multiple colors stacked). In example, column6 is even? 6 is even, but it's M (magenta) not O. So maybe lanes are rows? Let's think: "lanes" could be rows. Even rows are orange floor. Dancers stand in odd rows, columns? But they are columns of color rising upward from bottom. So each dancer is a column of color in odd columns, with bottom at bottom row. In example, bottom rows have colors A, W, B etc in certain columns. Let's examine bottom rows (rows 7-9). Row9: O W O A O M O B O. So there are colors W at column2? Actually column2 is W (maroon) which is odd column? column2 even. Hmm. Maybe the grid is transposed: The dancers are rows, not columns. Let's think differently. Better to analyze transformation: Output grid shows colors shifted right for costumes and left for shadows. Essentially each "dancer" column (odd lane) has a color column of some height (height = number of cells of that color from bottom up). The rule: shift the color columns right by one lane (wrapping) while shifting the empty orange floor left? Wait description: each dancer strips costume and tosses it one partner to the right — dancer at far end throws theirs to front of line (like boomerang). So costumes move right (to next odd lane?) The shadows slide opposite way left, each shadow stretching to fill space one partner to the left, with frontmost shadow wrapping to back. So the heights (shadows) shift left. Thus after transformation, each odd lane still has a column of color, but the color (costume) is from previous lane (right n ... [10177 chars truncated]
"A row of trees in autumn: each passes its fruit to its neighbor on one side, while its roots creep toward the neighbor on the other."
120b: fail
See: Colored trunks of varying heights stand rooted in amber soil, spaced evenly like trees in an orchard.
Do: Each tree donates its bark color to the tree on its left while stealing the root depth of the tree on its left — a symbiotic exchange where pigment flows one way and vigor flows the other.
Grid: Same dimensions as input. Amber background. Trunks only on every other column, anchored to the ground, with gaps of pure amber between them.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with background O (amber). Trunks only on every other column, anchored to ground, with gaps of pure amber between them. In input, there are vertical columns of colored cells (non-O) at certain columns, maybe representing trunks. They have varying heights (different number of colored cells). The rule: each tree donates its bark color to the tree on its left while stealing the root depth of the tree on its left — pigment flows one way and vigor flows the other. Interpretation: For each trunk column, its color (bark) moves left to the adjacent trunk column (the one to its left). Meanwhile, the height (root depth) of the left trunk is taken by the right trunk? Actually "stealing the root depth of the tree on its left" meaning the right tree takes the height of the left tree? Let's examine example 1. Example1 Input grid 9x9. Let's map coordinates. I'll write columns index 0-8. Input rows (top to bottom). Let's list non-O cells. Row0: all O. Row1: column5 M (magenta). So trunk at col5 with M color, height from row1 to row5? Actually rows 1-5 have M at col5. Row6 also has M? Row6: col5 M, plus col3 A, col7 B. Row7: col1 W, col3 A, col5 M, col7 B. Row8: same as row7. So there are trunks at columns 1 (W), 3 (A), 5 (M), 7 (B). They are spaced every 2 columns (odd columns). Each trunk extends from some row down to bottom (row8). Let's compute heights (number of colored cells in column): col1: rows7,8 have W (2 cells). So height 2. col3: rows6,7,8 have A (3 cells). Height 3. col5: rows1-8 have M (8 cells). Height 8. col7: rows6,7,8 have B (3 cells). Height 3. Now output grid: Let's see colors moved left. Output rows: column0? all O. Column1 now has? Output shows column1 has W in rows1-6? Wait output row1: O O O W O O O O O (col3? Actually row1 output: O O O W O O O O O). Let's index: row1 output col0 O, col1 O, col2 O, col3 W, col4 O, col5 O, col6 O, col7 O, col8 O. So W moved to column3? That's right: original W at col1 moved to col3 (two columns right). But description said each tree donates its bark color to the tree on its left. That would be moving left, not right. Let's verify. Original A at col3 moves to col5? Output row6: O B O W O A O O O. Let's examine row6 output: row6 (index 6) originally had A at col3, M at col5, B at col7. Output row6: O B O W O A O O O. So at col1? Actually row6 output col1 B (original B at col7 moved to col1?). Wait need systematic. Let's write output grid columns. I'll reconstruct output example1: Rows 0-8: 0: O O O O O O O O O 1: O O O W O O O O O 2: O O O W O O O O O 3: O O O W O O O O O 4: O O O W O O O O O 5: O O O W O O O O O 6: O B O W O A O O O 7: O B O W O A O M O 8: O B O W O A O M O Now locate colored columns: col1? row6 col1 B, row7 col1 B, row8 col1 B. So B column at col1 height 3 (same as original B height). col3 has W column height? rows1-8 col3 W (8 cells). So W column height 8 (original M height). col5 has A column height row ... [11840 chars truncated]
"Nebulae in a galactic ring: their spectra redshift one position clockwise while their luminous reach blueshifts one position counterclockwise — light and extent orbit in contrary motion."
120b: fail
See: Colored nebular columns of varying extent rise from an amber void, evenly distributed like beads on a cosmic string.
Do: Each nebula's spectral color rotates one position to the right while each nebula's extent (height) rotates one position to the left — hue and magnitude precess in opposite senses.
Grid: Same dimensions. Amber void is the background. Nebulae occupy alternating columns, anchored at the bottom.
We need to infer rule. From example 1: Input grid 9x9? Let's map. Input example1 grid (9 columns, 9 rows). Let's write rows top to bottom. Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Output grid same size. Output rows: Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O We need to see pattern: "nebulae" are columns of colored cells anchored at bottom, alternating columns? In input, there is a column of M (magenta) at column5 (0-index). It extends from row1 to row8 (full except top row). That's a nebula of magenta height 8? Actually rows 1-8 inclusive = 8 cells. Another column of A (azure) at column3 rows6-8 (3 cells). Another column of B (blue) at column7 rows6-8 (3 cells). Another column of W (maroon) at column1 rows7-8 (2 cells). So columns: col1 W height2, col3 A height3, col5 M height8, col7 B height3. They are alternating? Starting from leftmost non-O column? They are spaced by one O column between each (col0 O, col1 W, col2 O, col3 A, col4 O, col5 M, col6 O, col7 B, col8 O). Yes alternating columns with nebula. Now output: columns shifted? Let's see output columns: col1 now has B? Actually output col1 (index1) has B in rows6-8 (height3). col3 has W rows1-5? Wait output col3 (index3) has W rows1-5 and also rows6-8? Let's list output column values: col0 all O. col1: rows0-5 O, rows6-8 B. So B column height3 at col1. col2: all O. col3: rows0 O, rows1-5 W, rows6-8 W? Actually rows6-8 also W? Let's check rows6-8: row6: O B O W O A O O O -> col3 is W. row7: O B O W O A O M O -> col3 W. row8 same. So column3 has W from rows1-8 (height8). That's the magenta column moved? Wait original M column at col5 height8. In output, column3 has W (maroon) height8. So colors shifted right? Let's examine mapping. Original columns and colors: col1: W height2 col3: A height3 col5: M height8 col7: B height3 Output columns: col1: B height3 (was at col7) col3: W height8 (was at col1 but height changed? original W height2, now height8) col5: A height3? Let's check output col5 (index5): rows0-5 O, rows6-8 A (height3). Yes A column at col5 height3 (was at col3). col7: M? Output col7 (index7): rows0-5 O, rows6-8 M (height3). Wait original M height8, now at col7 height3. Actually output col7 has M rows7? Let's see rows6-8: row6 col7 O, row7 col7 M, row8 col7 M. So M appears rows7-8 height2? Wait row6 col7 O, row7 col7 M, row8 col7 M => height2. Hmm. Let's list output column heights: col1 B rows6-8 => height3 col3 W rows1-8 => height8 col5 A rows6-8 => height3 col7 M rows7-8 => height2 So heights have rotated left (extent rotates left) while colors rotate right. Original heights order left to right: col1 heigh ... [8055 chars truncated]
"Signal flags on a fleet of masts — the tide carries each flag's color one mast starboard while the current drags each mast's height one position port."
120b: k=2
See: Colored signal pennants of varying lengths fly from evenly spaced masts rising from an amber sea, all anchored to the waterline.
Do: Each pennant's color drifts one mast to the right while each mast's pennant length drifts one mast to the left — color and length are carried by opposing currents.
Grid: Same grid dimensions. Amber ocean is the background. Masts stand on alternating columns, rooted at the bottom.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with background O (amber). There are "masts" on alternating columns, rooted at bottom. In examples, there are vertical lines of a certain color (maybe representing pennant length). In example1 input: Let's map coordinates. 9x9? Actually input 9 rows, 9 columns. Let's write rows with indices. I'll recreate quickly. Example1 Input grid (9x9): Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Output: Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Observations: In input, there is a vertical column of M at column5 (0-index). That's the "mast"? Actually column5 has M from rows1-8 (except maybe row0). Also there is column3 with A from rows6-8, column1 with W rows7-8, column7 with B rows6-8. So there are multiple vertical lines (masts) each with a color (maybe representing pennant length). In output, the vertical column of M disappears? Actually output column5 now has O (background) except rows6-8? Wait output rows6-8 column5 is A? Let's check: Row6 output: O B O W O A O O O. So column5 (index5) is A. Row7: O B O W O A O M O -> column5 A again. Row8 same. So the M moved? In input column5 had M; in output column5 now has A (which originally was at column3). So colors shifted right? Let's see mapping: Input column1 had W (rows7-8). Output column3 has W (rows1-5 and 6-8?). Actually output column3 (index3) has W in rows1-5 and rows6-8? Row1-5 column3 = W, yes. So W moved from column1 to column3 (right by 2). Input column3 had A (rows6-8). Output column5 has A (right by 2). Input column7 had B (rows6-8). Output column1? Wait output column1 has B rows6-8. That's left shift? Actually B moved from column7 to column1 (left by 6). Hmm maybe rule: each "pennant's color drifts one mast to the right while each mast's pennant length drifts one mast to the left". So there are alternating columns that are "masts". The colors (the vertical lines) shift right to next mast column, while the lengths (i.e., the vertical extent) shift left to previous mast column. So each mast column holds a vertical line of a color; the color moves right, but the length (how many rows occupied) moves left. Let's identify mast columns: "alternating columns, rooted at the bottom". So maybe columns 1,3,5,7 are masts (odd indices). In example1, we have vertical lines at columns1 (W),3 (A),5 (M),7 (B). Indeed they are at odd columns (1,3,5,7). Good. Now each mast has a vertical line of some length (starting from some row near bottom). In input, lengths: column1 W occupies rows7-8 (2 cells). column3 A occupies rows6-8 (3 cells). column5 M occupies rows1-8 (8 cells). column7 B occupies rows6-8 (3 cell ... [8972 chars truncated]
"A shift register with two buses running in opposite directions — the signal type propagates right while the amplitude propagates left, and they meet at new junctions."
120b: k=1
See: Colored voltage bars of varying amplitude stand on alternating nodes along an amber circuit board, all grounded at the bottom.
Do: Each node's signal type (color) shifts one node to the right while each node's amplitude (height) shifts one node to the left — data and power counterflow through the register.
Grid: Identical dimensions. Amber PCB fills the background. Bars occupy alternating columns, rising from the bottom edge.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Let's map. Example1 Input (9x9): Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Output (9x9): Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Observation: In input, there are vertical bars of color M (magenta) in column 5 (0-index). Also column 3 has A (azure) rows 6-8? Actually rows6-8 column3 = A. Column7 has B (blue) rows6-8. Column1 has W (maroon) rows7-8. So bars occupy alternating columns? Let's see pattern: columns with bars: col1 (W), col3 (A), col5 (M), col7 (B). They are spaced by one column gap (col2,4,6,8 are O background). Bars rise from bottom: For each column, the colored cells occupy contiguous block from some row up to bottom? Let's check column5 M: rows1-5? Actually rows1-5 have M, also rows6? row6 col5 = M, row7 col5 = M, row8 col5 = M. So column5 M occupies rows1-8 (all except row0). That's a tall bar starting near top? Wait bottom is row8. So bar extends from row1 down to bottom (row8). Column3 A: rows6-8 only (3 cells). Column7 B: rows6-8 only. Column1 W: rows7-8 only (2 cells). So bars of varying heights. Output: Bars have shifted? In output, column1 now has B? Actually output column1 (index1) has B in rows6-8. Column3 now has W in rows1-5? Wait output column3 (index3) has W rows1-5 and also rows6-8? Let's examine output rows: Row0: all O Row1: O O O W O O O O O => column3 (0-index) = W Row2: same Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: O B O W O A O O O => column1 B, column3 W, column5 A Row7: O B O W O A O M O => column1 B, column3 W, column5 A, column7 M Row8: same as row7. So transformation: Colors shift: The "signal type (color) shifts one node to the right while each node's amplitude (height) shifts one node to the left". Means each column's color moves right, but the height (how many rows occupied) moves left. So for each bar, its color moves to next column to the right, but its height becomes the height of the bar that was originally to its left? Let's test. Original bars: col1 W height2 (rows7-8) col3 A height3 (rows6-8) col5 M height8? Actually rows1-8 = height8 (since 8 rows from 1 to 8 inclusive). That's height8. col7 B height3 (rows6-8) After transformation: col1 now B (color from col7 moved right? Wait B moved from col7 to col1? That's left wrap? Actually shift right: each color moves one column to the right. So color at col1 should move to col2? But col2 is background O. However output shows col1 B, which originally was at col7. That suggests wrap-around? Let's think: maybe columns are considered alternating nodes; only columns with bars are nodes. So nodes are at columns 1,3,5,7 (odd indices). Shifting right am ... [7576 chars truncated]
"The gods play their annual trick: each titan passes its divine aspect to the sibling on the right, but steals the mortal stature of the sibling on the left — divinity and mortality rotate like a two-headed serpent."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Titans of different divine colors and mortal heights stand on amber earth in evenly spaced sacred groves.
Do: Each titan's divine color cycles one position rightward while each titan's mortal stature cycles one position leftward — essence and presence contra-rotate around the pantheon.
Grid: Same dimensions. Amber earth is the background. Titans stand on alternating columns, rooted at the bottom.
"Partners in a contra dance — sashes pass to the right while the dancers' reach extends from the left, so everyone ends up in a new costume at a new stretch."
120b: k=1
See: Dancers in colored sashes of varying heights stand on amber marks, evenly spaced across the floor.
Do: Each dancer's sash color moves one place to the right while each dancer's extension (height) moves one place to the left — adornment and posture circulate as opposing spirals.
Grid: Same grid size. Amber floor is the background. Dancers occupy alternating columns, anchored at the bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's map. I'll write coordinates. Use rows top to bottom, columns left to right. Input example1 grid (I'll denote). Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Output: Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Observation: In input, there is a vertical column of M at column5 (0-index). Also column3 has A at rows6-8, column1 has W at rows7-8, column7 has B at rows6-8. So pattern: there are "dancers" occupying alternating columns? The description: dancers occupy alternating columns anchored at bottom. Colors: M, A, W, B. They are in columns 5,3,1,7 respectively. In output, the M column disappears? Actually output column5 becomes O (background). The M seems moved? Let's see output: column5 (index5) now has O except rows7-8 have M? Wait output rows7-8 column5 is M? Row7: O B O W O A O M O -> column5 (0-index) is A? Let's index: columns 0 O,1 B,2 O,3 W,4 O,5 A,6 O,7 M,8 O. So column5 now has A (was A originally at column3). Column3 now has W (was W originally at column1). Column1 now has B (was B originally at column7). Column7 now has M (was M originally at column5). So colors have shifted right? Let's map: original columns with colors: col1 W, col3 A, col5 M, col7 B. Output columns: col1 B, col3 W, col5 A, col7 M. So each color moved two columns to the right? Actually order: W->col3, A->col5, M->col7, B->col1 (wrap). That's a right shift by 2 positions (mod 8? but there are 4 occupied columns). The description: each dancer's sash color moves one place to the right while each dancer's extension (height) moves one place to the left. Height refers to vertical extent (how many rows occupied). In input, each column has a vertical segment of certain height: W column has height 2 (rows7-8). A column height 3 (rows6-8). M column height 6? Actually M column from rows1-6 (6 rows). B column height 3 (rows6-8). In output, heights have moved left: W height now at column3? Wait W column output at col3 has height 5? Let's check rows with W in output: rows1-5 have W at col3, also rows6-8 have W at col3? Actually rows6-8 col3 is W as well (row6: O B O W O A O O O). So W appears rows1-8? Let's list: output rows0 none, rows1-5 have W at col3, rows6-8 also have W at col3 (since row6 col3 W, row7 col3 W, row8 col3 W). That's 8 rows of W? Wait row0 no, row1-8 inclusive =8 rows. In input, W column had height 2 at bottom rows7-8. So height moved left (to column3) and also extended upward? Actually height seems to become the previous column's height? Let's examine mapping: The "extension (height)" moves one place to t ... [9776 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins in a canyon wall: erosion carries the pigment one fissure downstream while tectonic pressure pushes the depth one fissure upstream — color and strata migrate in opposing currents through the rock."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored mineral veins of varying depth stripe an amber cliff face at regular intervals, all anchored to the canyon floor.
Do: Each vein's mineral color shifts one fissure to the right while each vein's depth (height) shifts one fissure to the left — pigment and pressure contra-flow through the geology.
Grid: Identical dimensions. Amber rock is the matrix. Veins occupy alternating columns, rising from the bottom edge.
"A sushi conveyor belt where the fish switches plates in one direction but the rice portions slide the other way."
120b: k=1
See: Colored ingredients of different portion sizes sit on evenly spaced pedestals along an amber counter.
Do: Each ingredient's identity (flavor/color) shifts one pedestal to the left while each pedestal's portion size shifts one position to the right — the tastes rotate against the servings.
Grid: Grid matches input size. Amber is the counter surface. Ingredients form vertical stacks on alternating columns, built up from the bottom edge.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's examine pattern. Input example 1 (I'll label rows 0-8, cols 0-8). Represent characters. Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O We see vertical stacks on alternating columns? Let's see columns with non-O: column 3? Actually column indices: 0 O,1 O,2 O,3 O,4 O,5 ?,6 O,7 O,8 O. At column5 (index5) there is a vertical line of M from rows1-6? Row1-6 have M at col5. Row0 col5 O. Row7 col5 O? Actually row7 col5 O (since row7: O W O A O M O B O -> col5 is M? Wait count: col0 O,1 W,2 O,3 A,4 O,5 M,6 O,7 B,8 O. So row7 col5 M. Row8 col5 M. So column5 has M from rows1-8 except row0? Actually row0 col5 O. So vertical stack of M from row1 to row8 (8 rows). That's a column of M. Other columns: column3? Row6 col3 A, row7 col3 A, row8 col3 A. So column3 has A from rows6-8 (3 rows). Column1? rows7-8 have W at col1. Column7? rows6-8 have B at col7. Thus we have vertical stacks on columns 1,3,5,7 (alternating). Stacks built from bottom edge upward: bottom rows have W at col1 (rows7-8). A at col3 (rows6-8). M at col5 (rows1-8). B at col7 (rows6-8). So each stack maybe of different height. Now output grid: Let's see output rows. Row0: O O O O O O O O O (all O) Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Now stacks appear shifted left? Let's compare. Original stacks: column1 W (height2 rows7-8). column3 A (height3 rows6-8). column5 M (height8 rows1-8). column7 B (height3 rows6-8). Output stacks: column3 W (height? rows1-8? Actually rows1-5 have W at col3, rows6-8 also have W at col3. So height 8 rows1-8). column1 B (height3 rows6-8). column5 A (height3 rows6-8). column7 M (height2 rows7-8? Wait rows7-8 have M at col7, rows6? row6 col7 O. So height2 rows7-8). Hmm. It seems each ingredient's color shifts left by one pedestal (column) while each pedestal's portion size (height) shifts right by one. So the stack heights move right, colors move left. Interpretation: For each column that had a stack, the color (type) moves to the column to its left, but the height (number of cells) moves to the column to its right. So the shape (height) stays same but moves right, while the color moves left. Let's test: Original column1 had color W, height2. After transformation, color W moves left to column0? But column0 is O in output, not W. Wait maybe columns are considered only on alternating columns (pedestals). The "pedestals" are alternating columns (maybe odd columns). In input, stacks are on columns 1,3,5,7 (odd indices). In output, stacks appear also on odd columns? Output stacks are at columns1? Actually output has B at col1 (odd), W at col3 ... [8044 chars truncated]
"An orchestra pit where the instruments trade seats in one direction but the sheet music passes the other way — every musician plays a new part on a borrowed chair."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored sound columns of varying intensity rise from an amber stage floor at regular intervals.
Do: The timbre (color) of each column cycles one position rightward while the volume (height) cycles one position leftward — each voice now sings another's melody at another's amplitude.
Grid: Identical dimensions. Amber silence fills the background. Sound columns occupy every other column, rising from the bottom.
"Relay racers on a circular track — jerseys get passed clockwise but stamina is handed counterclockwise."
120b: k=1
See: Differently colored, differently tall athletes stand in lanes separated by amber rest zones, all planted on the finish line.
Do: Each racer gives their jersey to the runner on their right while absorbing the endurance of the runner on their left — uniforms circle one way, energy the other.
Grid: Same grid size. Amber lanes separate the racers. Each athlete is a vertical column of color on alternating columns, rooted at the bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's map. I'll write coordinates. Use rows top to bottom. Input example1 grid (9x9): Row1: O O O O O O O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O O O M O O O Row7: O O O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Row9: O W O A O M O B O We see vertical columns of colors: column5? Actually index starting 1. Let's locate non-O colors. Column2? Row8,9 have W at col2. Column4 has A at rows7-9. Column6 has M at rows2-9 (continuous). Column8 has B at rows7-9. So pattern: there are "lanes" of amber rest zones? Amber maybe represented by O? Actually O is orange, not amber. But description says amber rest zones separate racers. In grid, O is orange, maybe representing amber? But O is orange color. However the "lanes" are columns of O? The non-O columns are spaced by O columns? Let's see columns: col2 (W) is separated by O columns on both sides (col1 O, col3 O). col4 (A) separated by O columns (col3 O, col5 O). col6 (M) separated by O columns (col5 O, col7 O). col8 (B) separated by O columns (col7 O, col9 O). So indeed O columns act as separators (lanes). The athletes are vertical columns of a color (W, A, M, B) placed on alternating columns (every other column). They are "rooted at the bottom" meaning they extend from some row down to bottom? In example, each column extends from some top row to bottom? For W column2: rows8-9 only (two cells). Not full height. A column4: rows7-9 (three cells). M column6: rows2-9 (eight cells). B column8: rows7-9 (three cells). So they have varying heights. Now output example1: Row1: O O O O O O O O O (all O) Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O O O W O O O O O Row7: O B O W O A O O O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Row9: O B O W O A O M O Now the columns have shifted? Let's see new positions: W moved to column4? Actually output column4 has W rows2-6 (5 rows). Also rows7-9 column4 also W (since row7 col4 is W). So column4 now full from row2-9? Actually row2-6 W, row7 also W, row8 W, row9 W. So column4 all rows2-9 are W (except row1 O). So W column moved to column4 (originally column2). A moved to column6? In output column6 rows7-9 have A (rows7-9 col6 A). Also row2-6 column6 O. So A moved to column6 (originally column4). M moved to column8 rows8-9? Actually output column8 rows8-9 have M, rows7 also O? Wait row7 col8 O, row8 col8 M, row9 col8 M. So M moved to column8 (originally column6). B moved to column2 rows7-9? Output column2 rows7-9 B. Yes B moved to column2 (originally column8). So they rotated positions to the right? Let's see ordering: original order left to right: W (col2), A (col4), M (col6), B (col8). Output order left to right: B (col2), W (col4), A (col6), M (col8). That's a cyclic shift right by one? Actually original sequence: [W, A, M, B]. Output sequence: [B, W, A, M] which is shi ... [9862 chars truncated]
"Storm fronts that trade their color with the eastern neighbor and their fury with the western one, like pressure systems swapping masks at the solstice."
120b: k=1
See: Colored weather columns of varying intensity rise from an amber horizon, evenly spaced like fronts on a satellite map.
Do: Each front's hue drifts one position eastward (right) while each front's intensity (height) drifts one position westward (left) — the appearance and the power decouple and rotate in opposite directions.
Grid: Same dimensions. Amber sky fills the background. Storm columns stand on alternating columns, built upward from the bottom edge.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's map. I'll write coordinates (row, col). Input has background O (orange) everywhere except some columns with other colors: column 5? Let's index 0-8. Input rows: 0: O O O O O O O O O 1: O O O O O M O O O 2: O O O O O M O O O 3: O O O O O M O O O 4: O O O O O M O O O 5: O O O O O M O O O 6: O O A O M O B O 7: O W O A O M O B O 8: O W O A O M O B O So there is a vertical column of M at col5 rows1-5 and also rows6-8? Actually rows6-8 have M at col5 as well. So column 5 (0-index) is all M except row0? row0 col5 O. So column of M from row1 to row8. There is column of A at col3 rows6-8? Actually rows6-8 have A at col3. Also row7,8 have W at col1, and B at col6? Wait B at col6 rows6-8? Row6 col6 B, row7 col6 B, row8 col6 B. Also column of W at col1 rows7-8. So pattern: there are "storm columns" built upward from bottom edge, alternating columns. The description: "Storm columns stand on alternating columns, built upward from the bottom edge." So columns with non-background colors appear in alternating columns (maybe every other column). In input, columns with non-O: col1 (W), col3 (A), col5 (M), col6 (B). Not exactly alternating: col1,3,5,6. Hmm. Now output: Let's see output grid. Output rows: 0: O O O O O O O O O 1: O O O W O O O O O 2: O O O W O O O O O 3: O O O W O O O O O 4: O O O W O O O O O 5: O O O W O O O O O 6: O B O W O A O O O 7: O B O W O A O M O 8: O B O W O A O M O Now columns: col3 now has W from rows1-8? Actually col3 (0-index) has W rows1-8. col1 has B rows6-8? Wait col1 has B rows6-8. col5 has A rows6-8. col6 has M rows7-8? Actually col6 has M rows7-8. Let's map. So transformation: The "appearance" (color) drifts east (right) while "intensity" (height) drifts west (left). Means each column's colors shift right, but the heights shift left? Let's think. In input, column of M (magenta) is at col5, height from row1 to row8 (8 rows tall). In output, M column moved right? Actually M appears at col6 rows7-8 only (height 2). So its height decreased and moved right. Column of A at col3 rows6-8 (height 3). In output, A appears at col5 rows6-8 (height 3) moved right 2 columns? Actually from col3 to col5 (right 2). Height same. Column of W at col1 rows7-8 (height2). In output, W appears at col3 rows1-8 (height8) moved right 2 columns, height increased. Column of B at col6 rows6-8 (height3). In output, B appears at col1 rows6-8 (height3) moved left 5 columns? Actually from col6 to col1 (left 5). Height same. So pattern: each column's color moves right by some amount equal to its height? Or maybe each column's "intensity" (height) moves left: the height of column becomes the new column index? Let's compute. Input column heights: - M column height = rows1-8 = 8 rows (since row0 not M). Actually rows1-8 inclusive = 8 rows. - A column height = rows6-8 = 3 rows. - W column height = rows7-8 = 2 rows. - B column height = rows6-8 = 3 rows. ... [11154 chars truncated]
"A colonnade where the marble facades rotate one direction along the boulevard while the foundations shift the other — each pillar wears a new skin at a new depth."
120b: k=1
See: Colored pillars of varying heights rise from an amber plaza, evenly spaced with amber corridors between them.
Do: The façade material (color) of each pillar moves one position to the right while the foundation depth (height) moves one position to the left — stone dresses migrate against structural ambition.
Grid: Grid matches input exactly. Amber is the open plaza. Pillars exist only on alternating columns, anchored to the bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Actually example 1 input 9x9. Output also 9x9. Let's map. I'll write coordinates. Use rows 0-8, cols 0-8. Input example1 grid (I'll denote colors). Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O M O O O Row2: O O O O O M O O O Row3: O O O O O M O O O Row4: O O O O O M O O O Row5: O O O O O M O O O Row6: O O O A O M O B O Row7: O W O A O M O B O Row8: O W O A O M O B O Output: Row0: O O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O W O O O O O Row2: O O O W O O O O O Row3: O O O W O O O O O Row4: O O O W O O O O O Row5: O O O W O O O O O Row6: O B O W O A O O O Row7: O B O W O A O M O Row8: O B O W O A O M O Observation: There are pillars on alternating columns? In input, column 4? Let's see positions of non-O colors. Input non-O: Column5 (index5) has M vertical line rows1-6? Actually rows1-6 have M at col5. Also rows6-8 have M at col5 as well? Row6 col5 M, row7 col5 M, row8 col5 M. So column5 full of M from rows1-8 (except row0). That's a pillar. Column3 (index3) has A at rows6-8? Row6 col3 A, row7 col3 A, row8 col3 A. That's a pillar of A. Column1 (index1) has W at rows7-8? Row7 col1 W, row8 col1 W. That's a pillar of W. Column7 (index7) has B at rows6-8? Row6 col7 B, row7 col7 B, row8 col7 B. That's a pillar of B. So pillars are vertical columns of same color, located on alternating columns (maybe every 2 columns starting at 1?). Indeed columns 1,3,5,7 have pillars. Now output: Pillars have moved? Let's see output non-O positions. Column3 (index3) now has W vertical rows1-5? Actually rows1-5 col3 W, rows6-8 col3 W as well? Row6 col3 W, row7 col3 W, row8 col3 W. So column3 now all W rows1-8 (except row0). So W pillar moved from column1 to column3 (right by 2?). Wait original W at col1 rows7-8 only, not full height. In output, W pillar is full height (rows1-8). So also height moved left? Let's analyze rule: "façade material (color) of each pillar moves one position to the right while the foundation depth (height) moves one position to the left". Means color shifts right, height shifts left. So each pillar's color moves right column, but its height (i.e., how tall) moves left column? Actually "foundation depth (height) moves one position to the left". So the vertical extent (which rows are filled) shifts left? But height is vertical dimension, not horizontal. Maybe they mean the pillar's height (i.e., number of cells) moves leftwards (i.e., the pillar becomes shorter and moves left?). Let's think. In input, each pillar has a certain height (starting row maybe). For column5 M pillar: starts at row1 (since row0 empty) and goes down to row8 (full). Height = 8 rows? Actually rows1-8 inclusive =8 rows. In output, M pillar appears at column7 rows7-8? Let's check output: M appears at row7 col7? Row7 col7 M, row8 col7 M. Also row6 col7 O (empty). So M pillar now only rows7-8 (height 2) and column7 (right shift). So color M moved right to column7 (from 5 to 7). Height moved left? The height decreased and appears lo ... [9828 chars truncated]
"Banners and battalions rotate in opposite directions around the fortress walls — the flags march east while the armies march west."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored banners of different lengths hang from evenly spaced towers along an amber rampart, all touching the ground.
Do: Each tower's banner color advances one tower to the right while each tower's garrison strength (banner length) advances one tower to the left — heraldry and might circle in opposition.
Grid: Same dimensions. Amber stone fills the walls. Banners hang on alternating columns, draped from the bottom upward.
"Actors in a chorus line swap costumes to the right but trade their monologue lengths to the left — each performer debuts in borrowed clothes speaking stolen lines."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Costumed figures of varying stature stand on amber stage marks, evenly spaced under the lights.
Do: Each actor's costume (color) shifts one position stage-right while each actor's role length (height) shifts one position stage-left — wardrobe and script rotate as counter-currents.
Grid: Same grid size. Amber stage floor is the background. Figures occupy alternating columns, standing from the bottom.
"In the enchanted garden, flower colors blow rightward on the wind while root systems creep leftward underground — by morning each stem wears a neighbor's bloom at a neighbor's depth."
120b: k=3
See: Flowers of different colors and heights grow in alternating plots along an amber garden bed, all rooted at the bottom.
Do: Each flower's petal color migrates one plot to the right while each flower's stem height migrates one plot to the left — bloom and stature spiral in opposite directions.
Grid: Identical dimensions. Amber soil fills the bed. Flowers grow on every other column, rising from the bottom edge.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Flowers of different colors and heights grow in alternating plots along an amber garden bed, all rooted at the bottom. Each flower's petal color migrates one plot to the right while each flower's stem height migrates one plot to the left — bloom and stature spiral in opposite directions. Grid details: Identical dimensions. Amber soil fills the bed. Flowers grow on every other column, rising from the bottom edge." Interpretation: Input grid has "amber soil" maybe O (orange). Flowers are colored cells (non-O) placed on alternating columns (every other column). They have a "stem height" maybe vertical line of same color? Actually in examples, there are vertical columns of same color? Let's examine Example1. Input1 grid 9x9. Let's map coordinates (row0 top). Input shows column 5 (0-index?) Actually O O O O O O O O O (row0 all O). Row1: O O O O O M O O O (M at column5). Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6: O O O A O M O B O (A at col3, M at col5, B at col7). Row7: O W O A O M O B O (W at col1, A at col3, M at col5, B at col7). Row8 same as row7. So we have columns 1,3,5,7 have colored cells (W, A, M, B). Also column5 has M throughout rows1-6 (vertical line). Column3 has A rows6-8 (vertical). Column1 has W rows7-8 (vertical). Column7 has B rows6-8 (vertical). So pattern: colored columns at odd indices (1,3,5,7) maybe "flowers". Each column has a vertical segment of colored cells (stem) of varying height (starting from bottom). The bottommost row is row8 (index8). The "stem height" is number of colored cells in that column (including maybe topmost?). For column5 M: rows1-6 (6 cells) plus rows7-8 also M? Actually rows7-8 have M at col5 as well (yes row7 col5 M, row8 col5 M). So column5 has M from row1 to row8 (8 cells) except row0? Actually row0 O. So height 8? That's tall. Column3 A: rows6-8 (3 cells). Column1 W: rows7-8 (2 cells). Column7 B: rows6-8 (3 cells). So heights differ. Output1: Let's see transformation. Output grid same size. Output shows column3? Let's list output rows. Row0: O O O O O O O O O (all O) Row1: O O O W O O O O O (W at col3? Wait col index? Let's index: columns 0-8. Row1 output: O O O W O O O O O => W at col3 (0-based). Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6: O B O W O A O O O (B at col1, W at col3, A at col5). Row7: O B O W O A O M O (B col1, W col3, A col5, M col7). Row8 same. So after transformation, the colored columns have shifted? Let's compare input vs output. Input column1 (W) moved to column3 (W). Input column3 (A) moved to column5 (A). Input column5 (M) moved to column7 (M). Input column7 (B) moved to column1 (B). So they rotated right? Actually each "petal color migrates one plot to the right" meaning the colored cell (maybe topmost?) moves right. And "stem height migrates one plot to the left". So the vertical line (stem) moves left, while the color (maybe the top cell?) moves right? Let's examine. In input, column5 M vertical line heig ... [10611 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black background with several colored rectangles scattered across it. Each rectangle is a solid block of a single color (e.g., green, yellow, azure, red, blue) and can be any size (2×2, 3×3, 4×4, 2×3, etc.). Multiple rectangles may share the same color but appear as separate, non-touching blocks at different positions in the grid.
Do: 1. Identify every distinct contiguous rectangle of non-black color in the input grid. Two blocks of the same color that do not touch are separate rectangles. 2. Count how many rectangles exist for each color. 3. Rank the colors from most rectangles to fewest. 4. Determine the output width as the maximum rectangle count across all colors. The output height equals the number of distinct colors present. 5. Build the output grid as a right-aligned staircase: the top row corresponds to the color with the most rectangles and is fully filled (width cells of that color). Each subsequent row corresponds to the next color in descending count order, with that many cells of its color right-justified in the row (padded with black on the left). The result is a staircase descending from upper-right to lower-left.
Grid: The output grid has width equal to the largest rectangle count among all colors and height equal to the number of distinct colors. The background is black (.). Each row contains one color, right-aligned, with the number of colored cells equal to that color's rectangle count. Rows are ordered top-to-bottom from highest count to lowest count.
"A popularity contest where colors line up for a podium photo, the most popular standing proudest at the front."
120b: k=1
See: Scattered across a dark field are colonies of colored creatures — some colors have established many small settlements, others only a few. Each settlement is a solid rectangular encampment, and even siblings of the same color keep to their own separate camps, never touching.
Do: A talent show is being judged. Each color is a contestant, and the number of separate encampments they've founded is their vote count. The host calls them to the stage in order of popularity — the color with the most fans steps up first, standing tall across the full width of the stage. Each subsequent contestant steps up behind, but shyly — they only occupy as many spotlights as votes they earned, hugging the right edge of the stage while darkness fills the empty seats to their left. The stage shrinks into a staircase descending from the star to the underdog.
Grid: The stage is only as wide as the highest vote count and only as tall as there are contestants. Each row is one color's moment in the spotlight — right-justified, with their earned spotlights glowing and the rest dark. The champion fills the top row completely; each act below is one step further from the edge, forming a dark triangle of empty seats in the upper-left corner.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid contains colored rectangles (solid rectangular encampments) each color may have multiple separate rectangles, never touching. Need to count number of separate encampments per color (vote count). Then output grid is a staircase: rows correspond to colors sorted descending by count (most votes first). Width equals highest vote count. Each row is right-justified: fill with that color's count of cells on right side, left side '.' (black). So output grid dimensions: number of distinct colors = rows; columns = max count. In example 1, we need verify. Let's parse example 1 input (16x16). Need to count separate rectangular components per color. Colors present: Y, R, G, A. Possibly others? Let's see. We need to count number of separate rectangular encampments for each color. From visual: Y appears in top rows: first row has Y Y at columns 9-10? Actually row1: ". . . . . . . . Y Y . . . R R .". So Y rectangle maybe 2x2? Let's map. Better to count components: For each color, find distinct rectangular blocks not touching. From example output: rows are R, G, A, Y (order). Output grid: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y Thus counts: R count = 4, G count =3, A count=2, Y count=1. So they had 4,3,2,1 separate rectangles respectively. Let's verify with input: R appears many times; likely 4 separate rectangles. G appears 3 rectangles. A appears 2 rectangles. Y appears 1 rectangle. Thus rule matches. Now test input: need to count components per color. Colors present: A, G, Y. Possibly others? Let's scan. Rows 0-15 (16x16). I'll index rows. Row0: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." => A rectangle at columns 6-7 (0-index). Possibly part of larger rectangle. Row1: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." => G rectangle columns1-3, A rectangle columns6-7. Row2: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" => G rectangle columns1-3 (continuation of previous? same rows 1-2, columns1-3 forms rectangle 2x3? Actually rows1-2 have G at cols1-3, so that's one rectangle. Also G at cols9-10? Wait row2: after some spaces, "G G" at columns? Let's count: positions: 0 '.';1 G;2 G;3 G;4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 G;11 G;12 '.';13 '.';14 A;15 A. So another G rectangle at cols10-11 (size maybe 2x? rows2-3?). Row3 similar. Row3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" => same as row2. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." Row7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" Row8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . G G" Row9: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." Row10: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." Row11: ". G G . . Y Y Y . G G G G . . ." Row12: ". G G . . . . . . G G G G . . ." Row13: ". . . . Y Y . . . G G G G . . ." Row14: ". . . . Y Y . . . G G G G . . ." Row15: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Now need to identify separate rectangular components for each color. Let's map coordinates (row, col). We'll list components. Color A: appears rows0-1 columns6-7 (2x2 block ... [4173 chars truncated]
"In a petri dish, colonies of different bacterial strains compete for dominance. The species census determines their place in the survival hierarchy — the strain with the most colonies claims the widest territory in the final report, while rarer strains retreat into narrower niches. The results are tallied into a stacked tissue sample, each layer representing one species' footprint, pressed flush against the right wall of the slide."
120b: k=2
See: A petri dish teeming with isolated colonies of various bacterial strains, each colony a solid rectangular cluster of uniform color on a dark agar background.
Do: Conduct a census of each strain's colony count. Arrange the strains in a tissue cross-section from most prolific at the top to rarest at the bottom. Each strain's band is as wide as its colony count, pressed against the right edge of the slide, with empty agar filling the left.
Grid: The output slide has as many rows as there are strains and is as wide as the highest colony count. Each row is one strain's color, right-justified to its colony count, with dark agar (.) padding the left.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: Input grid contains isolated rectangular clusters of uniform color on black background (.). Need to count each color's colonies (clusters). Then output grid: rows correspond to each strain (color) sorted from most prolific (most clusters) at top to rarest at bottom. Each row width equals highest colony count (max number of clusters among colors). Each row is that color's code repeated count times, right-justified (i.e., padded on left with .). So each row has '.' on left for (maxCount - count) cells, then count cells of that color. Thus we need to count number of rectangular clusters per color. In examples verify. Example1: Input shows clusters of colors: R, G, A, Y. Need to count clusters. Let's count quickly: In output they gave rows: R row has 4 R's (since max count maybe 4). Output rows: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y Thus max count =4. R count =4 clusters. G count =3 clusters. A count =2 clusters. Y count =1 cluster. Check input: likely there are 4 red rectangular clusters, 3 green, 2 azure, 1 yellow. So rule matches. Example2: Colors: A, R, B. Output rows: A A A . R R . . B Thus max count =3. A count=3 clusters, R count=2 clusters, B count=1 cluster. Check input: likely. Thus rule stands. Now apply to test input. We need to identify distinct colors present (excluding .). Colors: A, G, Y. Possibly others? Let's scan. Rows 1-16 (since 16x16). Let's map. I'll label coordinates. Row1: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." So A appears at columns 7-8 (1-index). That's a cluster maybe part of larger rectangle. Row2: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." G at cols2-4 (three contiguous). A at 7-8. Row3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" G at 2-4, also G at 11-12. A at 15-16. Row4: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" Same as row3. Row5: all . (empty) Row6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." Y at cols5-7. Row7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." Y at 5-7, also Y at 10-11. Row8: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" Y at 5-7, Y at 10-11, G at 15-16? Wait columns: after spaces: let's count: columns 1-4 '.'; 5-7 Y; 8 '.'; 9 '.'? Actually pattern: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G". So after Y Y Y, column8 is '.'; column9 is '.'? there are two '.' after that? The string shows ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G". So columns: 1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 Y;6 Y;7 Y;8 '.';9 '.';10 Y;11 Y;12 '.';13 '.';14 '.';15 G;16 G. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . G G" G at 15-16. Row10: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." Y at 6-8? Wait columns: after five '.' then Y Y Y at cols6-8. Good. Row11: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." same as row10. Row12: ". G G . . Y Y Y . G G G G . . ." Let's parse: col1 '.';2 G;3 G;4 '.';5 '.';6 Y;7 Y;8 Y;9 '.';10 G;11 G;12 G;13 G;14 '.';15 '.';16 '.' Row13: ". G G . . . . . . G G G G . . ." col2-3 G; col10-13 G; rest '.'. Row14: ". . . . Y Y . . . G G G G . . ." col5-6 Y; col10-13 G. Row15: ". . . . Y Y . . . G G G G . . ." same as row14. Row16: all '.'. Now we need to identify ... [4541 chars truncated]
"Nebulae of different spectral signatures are scattered as rectangular patches across a dark star chart. The astronomer compiles a luminosity index — the spectral class observed in the most separate nebulae dominates the top band of the index, each band below narrows for rarer classes, all bands pinned to the right edge of the chart like a cosmic staircase descending into the void."
120b: fail
See: A dark star chart with isolated rectangular nebulae of various spectral colors. Multiple nebulae of the same color appear in separate locations across the chart.
Do: Count separate nebulae per spectral class. Compile a luminosity index: the most frequent class fills the top band, each subsequent band narrows by count, all right-aligned.
Grid: The index has one band per spectral class, ordered by nebula count descending. Width equals the highest count. Each band is the class's color, right-justified, with void (.) on the left.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 16x16? Output is 4x4? In example, output shows 4 rows each with 4 columns. It seems they produce a compact representation: each spectral class (color) appears as a band (row) of its color, right-aligned, width equals max count among classes, height equals number of classes. In example, counts of separate nebulae per color? Let's compute from example input. We need to count separate nebulae (connected components) per color. Connectivity likely orthogonal (4-direction). Let's identify colors present: R, G, A, Y. In example input, there are multiple rectangular blocks of each color. Need count of separate nebulae per class. From visual: R appears in several places: top right area? Let's count components. I'll map roughly. Rows 0-15 (0-index). Let's note positions. I'll sketch quickly. Row0: ... Y Y ... R R . Row1: ... R R R ... Y Y ... R R . Row2: ... R R R ... Row3: ... R R R ... ... R R R ... Row4: ... ... ... R R R ... Row5: ... ... G G ... R R R ... Row6: A A A A .. G G ... ... ... ... Row7: A A A A .. .... ... R R R R Row8: A A A A .. ... G G G ... R R R R Row9: A A A A .. ... G G G ... R R R R Row10: ... ... ... G G G ... R R R R Row11: ... A A ... Row12: ... A A ... Row13: ... ... G G ... Row14: ... ... G G ... Row15: all dots. We need to identify separate components per color. Let's count R components. There are multiple R clusters: top right cluster maybe one? Let's see coordinates. First cluster: rows0-4 columns? Row0 has R at columns? after Y Y there are . . . R R . So maybe columns 12-13? Row1 has R at columns 3-5 (three Rs) and also at columns 12-13. Row2 has R at columns 3-5. Row3 has R at columns 3-5 and also at columns 9-11? Actually row3: "... R R R . . . R R R . .". So there is a second cluster at columns 9-11. Row4 has R at columns 10-12? row4: "... R R R . .". So seems there are multiple separate R clusters: one on left side (columns 3-5 rows1-4) and one on right side (columns 9-13 rows0-4). Also later lower rows have R clusters at columns 12-15 rows7-10 etc. That's another cluster maybe connected to right top? Let's see: rows7-10 have R at columns 12-15 (four Rs). Are they connected vertically to the earlier right cluster? The earlier right cluster had Rs at columns 9-13 rows0-4. There is a gap rows5-6 maybe no Rs. Row5 has R at columns 10-12? Actually row5: "... R R R . .". So row5 has R at columns 10-12 (three Rs). That may connect to upper right cluster (since overlapping columns). Row6 has no R. Row7 has R at columns 12-15 (four). Row8 same. Row9 same. Row10 same. So likely all these right side Rs are one big component (connected via adjacency). So we have left cluster (small) and right large cluster. That's 2 R components. Now G components: There are G blocks at rows5-10 columns? Row5 has G G at columns 6-7. Row6 has G G at columns 6-7. Row7 none? Row8 has G G G at columns 6-8. Row9 same. Row10 has G G G at columns 6-8. Also later rows13-14 have G G at columns? row13: ... [10173 chars truncated]
"Flotillas flying different flags are anchored in scattered rectangular formations across a dark sea chart. The harbor master logs the fleet registry — the flag with the most separate flotillas claims the top berth at full dock width, each berth below shortens for flags with fewer flotillas, all vessels moored starboard-flush against the harbor wall."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sea chart with isolated rectangular flotillas of various flag colors anchored in separate positions. Multiple flotillas may fly the same flag but never raft together.
Do: Count each flag's separate flotillas. Assign harbor berths: the most numerous flag gets the top, widest berth, each berth below shrinks to its flotilla count, all flush against the starboard wall.
Grid: The harbor has one berth per flag color, ordered by flotilla count descending. Width equals the largest flotilla count. Each berth is the flag's color, right-justified, with open water (.) on the left.
"Component clusters of various types are soldered onto isolated rectangular pads across a dark circuit board. The engineer generates a power distribution diagram — the component type on the most separate pads draws the widest trace at the top, each trace below narrows for types on fewer pads, all traces terminating at the right-side bus bar."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark PCB with isolated rectangular component pads of various colors. The same component type may occupy multiple separate, non-touching pads.
Do: Count each component type's separate pads. Draw a power diagram: the type with the most pads gets the top, widest trace, each trace below narrows to its pad count, all right-terminated at the bus bar.
Grid: The diagram has one trace per component type, ordered by pad count descending. Width equals the highest pad count. Each trace is the component's color, right-justified, with empty board (.) on the left.
"Shrines to different deities are scattered as rectangular sanctuaries across a dark mythic landscape. The oracle reads the devotion index — the deity with the most separate shrines ascends to the top tier of the divine hierarchy, each tier below admits gods with fewer shrines, their domains narrowing accordingly, all tiers anchored to the eastern pillar of the celestial temple."
120b: fail
See: A dark mythic landscape with isolated rectangular shrines of various deity colors. Multiple shrines to the same deity appear in separate, non-touching locations.
Do: Count each deity's separate shrines. Build the celestial hierarchy: the most-worshipped deity crowns the top tier at full width, each tier below narrows to its shrine count, all right-aligned against the eastern pillar.
Grid: The temple has one tier per deity color, ordered by shrine count descending. Width equals the highest shrine count. Each tier is the deity's color, right-justified, with void (.) on the left.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid contains colored rectangles (shrines). Need to count separate shrines per color, then produce output grid with tiers: each tier corresponds to a deity (color) ordered by shrine count descending. Width equals highest shrine count. Each tier is the deity's color, right-justified, with '.' on left. In example 1, we need to verify. First, identify separate rectangular shrines of each color in input. Let's parse example 1 input (16x16). We need to count distinct non-touching rectangular blocks of same color. Let's attempt quickly. Colors present: Y, R, G, A. We need to count number of separate shrines per color. From visual: Y appears at top rows: first row columns 9-10 (two Y). second row also Y at 9-10. So that's a 2x2 block? Actually rows 0-1 columns 8-9 (0-index). That's a rectangle of Y size 2x2. Also later there are Y elsewhere? At rows 13-14 columns 12-13? Actually later there are G G at rows 13-14 columns 12-13. Y maybe only that one block. So Y count =1. R appears many places: there is a vertical block at rows 0-4 columns 12-13? Let's examine: Row0 columns 12-13 are R R. Row1 same. Row2 none. Row3 columns 9-11? Actually row3: ". . . R R R . . . . R R R . . ." So there is a block of R at columns 3-5 (3 wide) rows 1-4? Let's systematically count. Better: maybe there are 4 separate R shrines? Output shows tiers: top row "R R R R" (width 4). So highest count maybe 4 shrines of some color. Output rows: top row R's, second row G's, third row A's, fourth row Y's. So order descending counts: R most, then G, then A, then Y. Thus counts: R count =4, G count =3, A count =2, Y count =1. Check if that matches input. Count R shrines: Let's locate distinct rectangles. From input: Rows 0-1 columns 12-13: R R (2x2) => shrine 1. Rows 1-4? Actually row1 also has R at columns 3-5? Row1: ". . . R R R . . Y Y . . . R R ." So there is R block at columns 3-5 rows 1-4? Row2 has ". . . R R R . . . . . . . . . ." So rows 1-4 columns 3-5 are R (rows 1-4 inclusive?). Row3 also has R at columns 3-5 and also at columns 9-11? Row3: ". . . R R R . . . . R R R . . ." So there is second R block at columns 9-11 rows 3-5? Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . R R R . . ." So rows 3-5 columns 9-11 are R (3x3?). Let's map. Thus we have multiple R rectangles: one at top right (2x2). One at left middle (rows1-4 cols3-5) size maybe 4x3? Actually rows1-4 inclusive (row1,2,3,4) columns3-5 (3 columns) => 4 rows x3 columns rectangle (size 4x3). That's shrine 2. Another at middle right (rows3-5 cols9-11) size 3x3 rectangle (rows3,4,5). That's shrine 3. Also there is a block at bottom rows7-10 columns12-15? Let's see rows7-10: Row7: "A A A A . . . . . . . R R R R" columns 12-15 R R R R (4 wide) row7 only? Row8: "A A A A . . . G G G . . R R R R" same columns 12-15 R R R R row8. Row9: "A A A A . . . G G G . . R R R R" row9 same. Row10: ". . . . . . . G G G . . R R R R" row10 same. So that's a 4x4 rectangle of R (rows7-10, cols12-15). T ... [8685 chars truncated]
"Dance troupes in various colored costumes rehearse in isolated rectangular formations across a dark ballroom. The choreographer arranges the grand finale as a cascading reveal — the troupe that rehearsed in the most separate formations sweeps across the full top line, each line below features a troupe with fewer formations taking shorter passes, all finishing at the right wing of the stage."
120b: fail
See: A dark ballroom with isolated rectangular dance formations of various costumed colors. The same troupe color may appear in multiple separate formations.
Do: Count each troupe's separate formations. Choreograph the finale: the most-rehearsed troupe fills the top line, each line below shortens to its formation count, all ending at the right wing.
Grid: The finale has one line per troupe color, ordered by formation count descending. Width equals the highest formation count. Each line is the troupe's color, right-justified, with dark stage (.) on the left.
We need to understand puzzle: Count separate rectangular formations of each color. Output grid: each line corresponds to a color, ordered by formation count descending. Width equals highest formation count. Each line is the color repeated formation count times, right-justified, left side filled with '.'. From examples: Example1 output: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y Interpretation: Colors present: R, G, A, Y. Need to count separate rectangular formations of each color in input. Let's verify counts. In Example1 input grid 16x16. Let's identify formations. We need to count "isolated rectangular dance formations" meaning contiguous blocks of same color forming rectangles, not touching other same color blocks? They may be separate. Let's examine quickly: R appears in multiple rectangular blocks. Let's count. From visual: There is a block of R at top rows? Row0: positions 11-12? Actually row0: "... Y Y ... R R ..." So R block of size 2x? Row0 col? Let's index maybe not needed. But output shows R line length 4 (since width = highest formation count). So R count =4 formations. G line shows 3 G's (right-justified) meaning G count =3. A line shows 2 A's => count=2. Y line shows 1 Y => count=1. Thus counts: R=4, G=3, A=2, Y=1. Sorted descending: R, G, A, Y. Width = max count =4. So output grid 4 rows, 4 columns. Row for each color: right-justified with that many color cells. Matches. Now verify counts from input: need to see if indeed there are 4 separate rectangular R formations, etc. Probably yes. Example2: Output: A A A . R R . . B Counts: A=3, R=2, B=1. Width=3. Order descending: A (3), R (2), B (1). Good. Now we need to apply to test input. We must count separate rectangular formations for each color present (excluding '.' which is background). Colors: A, G, Y maybe others? Let's list: In test input we see A, G, Y. Also maybe other colors? I see only A, G, Y. No B,R,X,M,O,W. Thus we need to count number of distinct rectangular formations for each of A, G, Y. Important: Formations are rectangular and isolated (no touching). Need to ensure that each contiguous region of same color forms a rectangle (likely given). Count each separate rectangle. Let's parse test input grid 16x16. I'll label rows 0-15, columns 0-15. I'll write each row as string with spaces. Row0: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." Indices: 0-5 '.'; 6 A;7 A; 8-15 '.'. Row1: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." Indices:0 '.';1 G;2 G;3 G;4 '.';5 '.';6 A;7 A; rest '.'. Row2: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" Indices:0 '.';1 G;2 G;3 G;4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 G;11 G;12 '.';13 '.';14 A;15 A. Row3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" Same as row2. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." All '.'. Row5: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." Indices:0-3 '.';4 Y;5 Y;6 Y; rest '.'. Row6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." Indices:0-3 '.';4 Y;5 Y;6 Y;7 '.';8 '.';9 Y;10 Y;11 '.';12-15 '.'. Row7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" Indices:0-3 '.';4 Y;5 Y;6 Y;7 ... [8172 chars truncated]
"Mineral deposits of different types are exposed as isolated rectangular outcrops across a dark geological survey map. The geologist drafts a stratigraphic column ranked by prevalence — the mineral found in the most separate outcrops forms the widest top stratum, each layer below thins for minerals with fewer outcrops, all strata flush against the right face of the drill core."
120b: fail
See: A dark survey map with isolated rectangular mineral outcrops of various colors. Multiple outcrops of the same mineral appear in separate, non-touching locations.
Do: Count each mineral's separate outcrops. Draft a stratigraphic column: the most prevalent mineral forms the top, widest stratum, each layer below narrows to its outcrop count, all right-aligned against the core face.
Grid: The column has one stratum per mineral color, ordered by outcrop count descending. Width equals the highest outcrop count. Each stratum is the mineral's color, right-justified, with empty rock (.) on the left.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grids with many colors, output is a small grid representing counts of separate outcrops per color, sorted descending, right-aligned. Let's analyze Example1. Input: 16x16 grid. Colors present: Y, R, G, A. Possibly others? Let's count outcrops. We need to identify separate rectangular mineral outcrops of same color, non-touching. In description: isolated rectangular mineral outcrops of various colors. So each outcrop is a rectangle of same color, not touching others of same color. We need to count each mineral's separate outcrops. Then produce column: top stratum is most prevalent mineral (most outcrops). Width equals highest outcrop count. Each stratum is the mineral's color, right-justified, with '.' left. Output for Example1: Rows: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y So there are 4 rows (one per mineral). Width = 4 (max outcrop count). Right-justified. Thus counts: R has 4 outcrops, G has 3, A has 2, Y has 1. Check if that matches input. Let's examine input quickly. We need to count rectangles of each color. From visual: R appears many times. Let's locate. Rows 0-3 etc. Hard but we can approximate. Better: trust that counts are as above. Thus rule: For each color (excluding '.'), count number of distinct connected components (probably 4-connected) that are rectangular and isolated (no touching). Then produce output grid: number of rows = number of colors. Order descending by count. Width = max count. For each row, fill with that color's character right-aligned, left side '.'. Now Example2. Input colors: A, B, R. Output: A A A . R R . . B Thus counts: A has 3 outcrops, R has 2, B has 1. Width = 3. Check if matches input. Look at input: A appears many times in top left region, maybe 3 separate rectangles. R appears two separate rectangles (one at rows 11-13 maybe). B appears one rectangle. Thus matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now apply to test input. We need to identify colors present: A, G, Y. Possibly others? Let's scan. Rows (0-index): 0: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." => A at columns 6,7 (0-index). That's a rectangle maybe 2x? Let's see later rows. 1: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." => G at columns 1-3 (three G). A at 6,7. 2: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" => G at 1-3, also G at 9-10? Actually columns: after spaces: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A". So G at 1-3, and at 10-11 (since there are two G). A at 14-15. 3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" => same as row2. 4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." => none. 5: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." => Y at 4-6. 6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." => Y at 4-6, also Y at 9-10? Actually after spaces: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . .". So Y at 4-6, Y at 9-10. 7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" => Y at 4-6, Y at 9-10, G at 14-15? Wait columns: after spaces: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G". So G at 14-15. 8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . G G" => G at 14-15. 9: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . ... [6364 chars truncated]
"A chef inventories the pantry before service, counting how many containers hold each ingredient. The mise en place board is then arranged as a descending cascade — the most abundant ingredient fills the top shelf edge-to-edge, while scarcer items occupy progressively shorter rows below, each pushed snug against the right side of the cutting board."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark countertop scattered with sealed containers of various colored ingredients. Each container is a solid rectangular block; containers of the same ingredient may appear in multiple spots but never touch.
Do: Count the containers for each ingredient color. Arrange a mise en place board: the ingredient with the most containers fills the top row completely, each subsequent ingredient gets a shorter row below it, all right-aligned on the board.
Grid: The board is as wide as the largest container count and as tall as the number of ingredients. Each row holds one ingredient color, right-justified, padded with empty counter (.) on the left.
"An orchestra's instrument sections are scattered across a rehearsal hall. The conductor takes attendance — sections with more player groups earn longer phrases in the finale's descending fanfare. The score is written right-to-left, each instrument's line trimmed to match how many ensembles it fielded, cascading downward like a diminuendo from fortissimo to pianissimo."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark rehearsal hall dotted with isolated rectangular clusters of musicians, each cluster a single instrument section's color. The same instrument may have multiple separate clusters positioned around the hall.
Do: Count the separate clusters for each instrument section. Compose a score: the section with the most clusters plays the top line at full width, each subsequent section plays a shorter line below, all ending on the same right-hand beat.
Grid: The score has one row per instrument section, ordered by cluster count descending. Width equals the maximum cluster count. Each row is that section's color, right-aligned, with rests (.) on the left.
"Teams scattered across practice fields send delegates to a championship bracket. Each team's delegation size reflects how many separate squads they fielded. At the awards ceremony, teams line up on a podium staircase — the team with the most squads stands on the widest top step, each step below grows narrower, all flush against the trophy wall on the right."
120b: fail
See: A dark athletic complex with rectangular team practice zones of various colors spread across the fields. Teams of the same color may occupy multiple non-adjacent zones.
Do: Count each team's separate practice zones. Build a podium: the team with the most zones claims the top, widest step. Each lower step narrows by the next team's zone count, all steps right-aligned against the trophy wall.
Grid: The podium has one step per team color, height equals number of teams, width equals the largest zone count. Each step is the team's color, right-justified, with empty space (.) on the left.
We need to infer rule. From description: count separate zones (connected components) of each color (non-adjacent zones). Build podium: each step corresponds to a team color, height equals number of teams, width equals largest zone count. Steps right-aligned, each step's width equals that team's zone count? Actually "Each lower step narrows by the next team's zone count". So top step width = max zone count (most zones). Next step width = second most zone count, etc. Steps right-aligned against trophy wall (left side filled with .). Output grid shows steps stacked vertically, each row corresponds to a team color? Let's examine Example1. We need to compute zones per color in input. Example1 input grid 16x16. Colors present: Y, R, G, A. Let's count connected components (4-direction? likely orthogonal). Let's approximate. From visual: Y appears in top rows columns 9-10 maybe two cells? Actually first row: Y Y at columns 9-10. Second row same. They are contiguous vertically, forming a 2x2 block? Row1 col9-10 Y Y, row2 col9-10 Y Y. That's one component. No other Y elsewhere? I think only that block. So Y zones =1. R appears many places: there are multiple rectangular blocks. Let's identify components: top left area rows1-4 columns4-6 maybe? Actually rows1-4 have R R R pattern. Row1 columns13-14 R R. Row2 same. Row3 none. Row4 columns13-15? Row4 has R R R at columns13-15? Actually row4: ". . . R R R . . . . R R R . . ." So there is a block at columns4-6 rows1-4? Row1 col13-14 R R, row2 same, row4 col13-15 R R R (3). Row3 none. Also later rows have R R R etc. There may be multiple components. Let's count quickly: component1: top-left block rows1-4 cols4-6 (connected). component2: top-right block rows1-2 cols13-14 (2x2). component3: middle block rows4-6 cols11-13? Row4 col11-13 R R R, row5 col11-13 R R R, row6 col11-13 R R R. That's another component. component4: rows7-10 col13-16? Row7 has R R R R at cols13-16, row8 same, row9 same, row10 same. That's another component. So total R zones =4. G appears: rows5-6 col7-8? Row5 has G G at col7-8, row6 same. Also rows7-10 have G G G at cols8-10? Actually rows7-10 have G G G at cols8-10? Let's see rows7: "A A A A . . . G G . . . . . . ." So G G at cols8-9? row8 similar, row9 similar, row10 similar. Also rows13-14 have G G at cols13-14? Actually rows13-14: ". . . . . . . . . . . . G G . ." So another component. Also rows15-16 have G G at cols13-14? rows15-16 have G G . . .? Actually rows15-16: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." no G. So total G zones: maybe 3? Let's list: component1: rows5-6 col7-8 (2x2). component2: rows7-10 col8-9? Actually rows7-10 have G G at cols8-9 (4 rows). That's connected to component1? There's a gap row7 col8-9 but row6 col7-8, they are adjacent vertically? Row6 col7-8, row7 col8-9 not directly adjacent because column offset? Row6 col8 adjacent to row7 col8 (vertical). So they connect, making a larger component spanning rows5-10 col7-9 maybe. So maybe it's one component. Then compone ... [9355 chars truncated]
"Storm cells of different types are scattered across a radar map. The meteorologist files a severity report: the phenomenon observed in the most separate cells ranks highest in the warning bulletin. The bulletin is printed as a descending barometric chart — the most frequent phenomenon fills the top bar completely, each subsequent type gets a shorter bar below, all pinned to the right edge of the chart."
120b: k=1
See: A dark radar screen showing isolated rectangular storm cells of various colors. Multiple cells of the same color type appear in separate locations across the map.
Do: Count the separate cells for each storm type. Build a severity chart: the most frequent type fills the top bar, each subsequent type gets fewer cells in its bar below, all bars right-aligned.
Grid: The chart has one row per storm type, ordered by cell count descending. Width equals the highest count. Each row shows that type's color right-justified, with clear sky (.) padding the left.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 16x16? Output is 4x4? Let's analyze. In example 1, input shows multiple rectangular blocks of colors: Y block top right? R block central? G block somewhere? A block left? Let's count separate cells (connected components) of each color. Likely each "storm cell" is a rectangular region of same color, isolated. Need count of separate cells per color. Then output chart: rows sorted descending by count, each row width = max count, right-aligned with color cells (maybe each cell represented by that color character). In output example, we have rows: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y Interpretation: counts: R appears 4 cells, G 3, A 2, Y 1. So max count =4 width. Right-aligned: row for R has 4 R's (no padding). Row for G has 1 dot then 3 G's. Row for A has 2 dots then 2 A's. Row for Y has 3 dots then 1 Y. Thus rule: count number of separate rectangular blocks of each color in input. Output grid with rows for each color that appears, sorted descending by count. Width = max count. Each row: left padding with '.' to right-align the color cells, number of color cells equals its count. Now need to apply to test input. We must count separate cells (connected components) of each color. Need to consider connectivity: likely orthogonal (4-direction) adjacency. The blocks appear rectangular clusters. Let's parse test input 16x16. I'll label rows 0-15, columns 0-15. Row0: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." So A at cols6,7 (two adjacent). That's a block maybe part of larger A region? Let's see other rows. Row1: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." G at cols1-3 (three contiguous). A at cols6,7 again (same columns). So A block 2x2? Row0 and Row1 have A at (0,6)(0,7)(1,6)(1,7) forming 2x2 rectangle. That's one A cell. Row2: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" G at cols1-3 again (continuation of previous G block? Row0-1 had G at 1-3 only rows1? Row0 none. Row1 had G at 1-3. Row2 also G at 1-3, so that extends vertical, making a 3x3 block? Actually rows1-2 have G at 1-3, row0 none. So block of G size rows1-2 (2 rows) columns1-3 (3 cols) = 2x3 rectangle. Row2 also has G at cols10,11 (two). That's separate block maybe. Also A at cols14,15 (two). That's separate A block. Row3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" Same as row2: G at 1-3, G at 10,11, A at 14,15. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." empty. Row5: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." Y at cols4,5,6 (three). That's a block maybe 2 rows? Let's see row6. Row6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." Y at cols4,5,6 (continuation) and also Y at cols9,10 (two). So first Y block extends rows5-6 columns4-6 (2x3). Second Y block maybe rows6-? Let's continue. Row7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" Y at 4-6, Y at 9,10, G at 14,15. Row8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . G G" G at 14,15. Row9: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." Y at 5,6,7? Wait columns? Row9: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." Indices: col0 '.';1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 'Y';6 'Y';7 'Y'; rest '.' So Y block at 5-7 (3) ... [4691 chars truncated]
"Across a dark cityscape, buildings of various materials stand as isolated blocks. The city planner drafts a skyline elevation ordered by material prevalence — the most common material forms the widest rooftop at the peak, each lower terrace narrows for less common materials, all facades flush against the eastern wall, creating a stepped ziggurat descending to the west."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark city grid with isolated rectangular buildings of uniform color scattered across the landscape. Buildings of the same material color appear in multiple separate locations.
Do: Count the separate buildings per material. Draft a ziggurat elevation: the most prevalent material crowns the top at full width, each terrace below narrows to match its building count, all right-aligned against the eastern wall.
Grid: The ziggurat has one terrace per material, width equals the maximum building count, terraces descend by count. Each row is the material's color, right-justified, with void (.) on the left.
"Regiments of various banners are encamped across a dark battlefield. The general assembles a battle formation based on each banner's encampment count — the banner with the most camps commands the front rank at full strength, each rank behind fields fewer soldiers matching its camp count, all ranks anchored to the right flank."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark battlefield with isolated rectangular encampments of various banner colors. The same banner color may appear in multiple separate, non-touching camps.
Do: Count each banner's separate encampments. Form up: the banner with the most camps fills the front rank, each subsequent rank shrinks to its camp count, all right-flank-aligned.
Grid: The formation has one rank per banner color, ordered by camp count descending. Width equals the largest camp count. Each rank is its banner color, right-justified, with empty ground (.) on the left.
"Actors in various costume colors are positioned in isolated blocking groups across a dark stage. The director arranges the curtain call by ensemble size — the color that appeared in the most separate scenes takes the top bow spanning the full width, each subsequent cast takes a narrower bow below, all lining up stage-right, forming a cascading tableau."
120b: fail
See: A dark stage with isolated rectangular blocking groups of costumed actors in various colors. The same costume color may appear in multiple separate groups.
Do: Count each costume color's separate blocking groups. Arrange the curtain call: most groups takes the top, widest bow, each color below gets fewer spots, all aligned to stage-right.
Grid: The curtain call has one row per costume color, ordered by group count descending. Width equals the maximum group count. Each row is the costume's color, right-justified, with dark stage (.) on the left.
We need to infer rule: Count separate groups (connected components) of each color (non '.'), using orthogonal adjacency? Likely 4-direction connectivity. Then produce output grid: rows correspond to colors sorted by descending number of groups. Width equals maximum group count among colors. Each row is right-justified: fill from rightmost columns with that color's code repeated count times? Wait example 1 output: R R R R . G G G . . A A . . . Y Let's compute groups in example1 input. We need to count groups per color. Let's parse quickly. Colors present: R, G, A, Y. We need to count separate rectangular blocking groups (isolated rectangular groups). Likely each group is a rectangle of same color contiguous orthogonally. Count groups: From visual, there are multiple R groups. Let's approximate. Look at input example1 (16x16). Hard but we can approximate. Better compute: maybe R groups count = 4? Output first row has 4 R's (max width). So max group count = 4. That suggests R has 4 groups, G has 3 groups, A has 2 groups, Y has 1 group. Indeed rows show counts: row1: 4 R's, row2: 3 G's, row3: 2 A's, row4: 1 Y. Thus rule: For each color, count number of distinct groups (connected components). Then produce a grid where each row corresponds to a color, sorted descending by group count. Row length = max group count across colors. Fill from rightmost side with that color's code repeated group count times, left side filled with '.'. Thus output grid dimensions: rows = number of colors present, columns = max group count. Check example2: Colors: A, R, B. Output: A A A . R R . . B Counts: A row has 3 A's, R row has 2 R's, B row has 1 B. So max count =3. So rows =3 colors. Sorted descending: A (3 groups), R (2 groups), B (1 group). Works. Now need to compute groups for test input. We have colors: A, G, Y maybe others? Let's list: A, G, Y. Also maybe others? I see only A, G, Y. No R, B, etc. We need to count separate groups for each. Let's map grid 16x16. I'll index rows 0-15, columns 0-15. I'll write each row: 0: ". . . . . . A A . . . . . . . ." => columns 6,7 are A. 1: ". G G G . . A A . . . . . . . ." => col1-3 G, col6-7 A. 2: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" => col1-3 G, col9-10 G? Wait positions: after ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A". Let's count: col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 G; col3 G; col4 '.'; col5 '.'; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'; col10 G; col11 G; col12 '.'; col13 '.'; col14 A; col15 A. 3: ". G G G . . . . . . G G . . A A" same as row2. 4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." all dots. 5: ". . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . . ." => col4-6 Y. 6: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . . ." => col4-6 Y, col9-10 Y. 7: ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G" => col4-6 Y, col9-10 Y, col14-15 G? Wait after ". . . . Y Y Y . . Y Y . . . G G": columns: 0-3 '.'; 4 Y;5 Y;6 Y;7 '.';8 '.';9 Y;10 Y;11 '.';12 '.';13 '.';14 G;15 G. 8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . G G" => col14-15 G. 9: ". . . . . Y Y Y . . . . . . . ." => col5-7 Y ... [5867 chars truncated]
"Flower beds of various colors are planted in scattered rectangular plots across a dark garden. The gardener arranges a harvest display by abundance — the flower with the most separate beds fills the top shelf of the display, each shelf below holds fewer blooms matching the bed count, all bouquets pressed against the right edge of the display case."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark garden with isolated rectangular flower beds of various colors. Multiple beds of the same flower color appear in separate, non-touching locations.
Do: Count each flower color's separate beds. Build a harvest display: the most abundant flower fills the top shelf, each shelf below narrows to its bed count, all right-aligned in the display case.
Grid: The display has one shelf per flower color, ordered by bed count descending. Width equals the highest bed count. Each shelf is the flower's color, right-justified, with empty space (.) on the left.
See: The input grid has a black background with two key features: (1) A horizontal 'header segment' of exactly 3 consecutive colored pixels in row 0, and (2) scattered 'anchor' pixels elsewhere in the grid, each matching one of the header colors. Each anchor pixel appears at most once per header color. Some header colors may have no corresponding anchor pixel.
Do: For each of the 3 header colors, from left to right occupying columns L, M, R in row 0: (1) Find whether an anchor pixel of that color exists elsewhere in the grid. (2) If an anchor exists at position (row_a, col_a): fill that color's header column from row 0 down through row_a, then fill row_a horizontally from col_a to the header column (inclusive), connecting the anchor to the column. (3) If no anchor exists for that color: extend that color's header column from row 0 all the way down to the last row of the grid. All other cells remain black.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly (no resizing). The background is black (.). Row 0 contains a contiguous 3-pixel colored segment; the rest of the grid is black except for isolated anchor pixels. The coordinate system is row-major with (0,0) at the top-left.
"Lightning rods on a rooftop attract bolts from storms on the horizon."
120b: k=1
See: A rooftop runs along the top of the grid — three lightning rods stand side by side, each a different color. Scattered across the dark sky below, lone storm clouds drift, each glowing with the same color as one of the rods that calls to it.
Do: Each lightning rod reaches downward through the darkness, searching for its matching storm cloud. When a rod finds its cloud, a bolt of lightning strikes — the rod's color streams straight down from the rooftop and then arcs horizontally to meet the cloud, forging an L-shaped path of light. If a rod has no cloud to attract, its energy simply pours all the way down to the ground, an unbroken pillar of color with nowhere else to go.
Grid: The rooftop sits along the top edge — three adjacent colored rods against a pitch-black sky. The storm clouds are single colored sparks floating in the darkness. Lightning bolts are vertical then horizontal, always connecting rod to cloud by the shortest L-shaped route through the rod's own column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 12x12? Let's count. Example input lines: each line has 12 entries. Yes 12x12. In example, top row has "... X G A ..." three colored rods? Actually rooftop: three adjacent colored rods along top edge. In example input top row: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So at columns 5,6,7 (0-index?) there are X (grey), G (green), A (azure). That's three adjacent colored cells. They are the rods. Storm clouds are single colored sparks elsewhere: In example input there are X at row5 col1? Let's see: row5 (0-index row4) line: "X . . . . . . . . . . ." So X at column1. Also A at row6 col12? Actually row6 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . A" so A at column12. Also G at row9 line: "G . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at column1. So clouds of same colors as rods. Now output shows L-shaped connections: For each rod, vertical line down from its column until reaching row of its cloud, then horizontal line to cloud column. Let's verify: Rod X at column5 (index4). Cloud X at row5 col1 (index0). So vertical line from row1 to row5 in column5? Output shows column5 (X) from rows1-4? Let's examine output rows: Row1 same as input. Row2: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So X appears at row2 col5. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So row5 has X across columns1-5 (horizontal). So vertical line from rows1-5 column5 (X). Then horizontal from column5 to column1 (cloud) at row5. Yes. Rod G at column6 (col6). Cloud G at row9 col1. Output: vertical G from rows1-8 column6? Let's see rows2-4 have G at col6? Row2: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." includes G at col6. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." includes G at col6. Row6: ". . . . . G A A A A A A" includes G at col6. Row7: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." includes G at col6. Row8: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." includes G at col6. Row9: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." includes G across columns1-6. So vertical line down to row9 col6, then horizontal left to col1. Rod A at column7 (col7). Cloud A at row6 col12. Output: vertical A from rows1-5 col7? Row1 has A at col7. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6: ". . . . . G A A A A A A" includes A at col7 and also A's across columns8-12 (horizontal). So vertical down to row6 col7, then horizontal right to col12. If a rod has no cloud, vertical line goes all the way to bottom (ground). Not present in example. Thus rule: Identify three adjacent colored cells on top row (rods). For each, find matching colored cell elsewhere (cloud). If found, draw vertical line of that color from rod down to the row of cloud (including rod row and cloud row). Then draw horizontal line from that column to cloud column on that row. If multiple clouds of same color? Probably only one. If no cloud, draw vertical line down to bottom row (row12). No horizontal. Now test input: Let's parse. Grid 12x12. Rows: 1: ". . . Y A X . . . . ." 2: ". . . . . . . . . . ." 3: ". . . . . . . . . . ." 4: ". . . . . . . . . . ." 5: ". . . . . . . . . . ." 6: ". . . . . . ... [4248 chars truncated]
"Three nerve endings in the brain stem sense distant organs and grow axons toward them, branching laterally upon arrival to form synaptic connections."
120b: k=3
See: A cluster of three adjacent nerve cells sits at the top of an otherwise empty tissue matrix. Scattered throughout the body are isolated organ cells, each color-coded to match one of the nerves.
Do: Each nerve extends a dendrite straight down through the tissue toward its matching organ cell. When it reaches the organ's depth, it branches sideways to physically contact the organ. If no organ exists for a nerve, the dendrite grows all the way to the tissue's edge.
Grid: The tissue matrix keeps its original dimensions. Black cells are empty interstitial space. The top cluster and organ cells remain in place; dendrite paths fill in between.
We need to infer rule. From description: top cluster of three adjacent nerve cells sits at top of otherwise empty matrix. Scattered throughout are isolated organ cells, each color-coded to match one of the nerves. Each nerve extends a dendrite straight down through tissue toward its matching organ cell. When it reaches organ's depth, it branches sideways to physically contact the organ. If no organ exists for a nerve, the dendrite grows all the way to tissue's edge. Interpretation: Input grid contains a top row cluster of three adjacent colored cells (nerve cells). Then elsewhere there are same colors (organ cells). Output: draw vertical line (same column) from each nerve downwards, filling with that color (or maybe a specific color) until reaching the row of the organ of same color; then fill horizontally from that column to the organ's column (branch) at that row, using same color? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid size 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input shows top cluster: row0 has X G A at columns 4,5,6? Let's index columns 0-11. Row0: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So three adjacent cells: X (grey), G (green), A (azure) at columns 4,5,6. That's the nerve cluster. Other organ cells: there is X at row4 col0, A at row5 col11, G at row8 col0. So each color appears elsewhere. Output: Let's see result. Row0 unchanged. Row1: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So vertical line extended down one row for each of the three colors? Actually row1 now has X G A at same columns 4,5,6. Row2 same, row3 same. Row4: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." Wait row4 originally had X at col0 only. Output row4 now has X across columns 0-4? Let's examine: row4 output: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So at row4, the vertical line for X extended down to row4 column0? Actually X nerve column is 4. But row4 now has X at columns 0-4 (five X's). That seems like horizontal branch from column4 to column0 where organ X is located at (row4,col0). So vertical line of X from top (col4) down to row4 (same column) then horizontal leftwards to organ at col0, filling with X. Similarly G nerve column5: vertical line down to row4 col5 (still G). At row4, there is G at col5 (same as vertical). Then horizontal? The organ G is at row8 col0, not row4. So not yet. Actually row4 output shows G at col5 (vertical). No horizontal for G yet. A nerve column6: organ A at row5 col11. At row4 output, A at col6 (vertical). No horizontal yet. Row5 output: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Row5 originally had A at col11. Output row5 now has G at col5? Wait row5 output: columns? Let's map: row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So at col5 is G (vertical line continues). At col6 is A (vertical). Then from col7 to col11 are A's (horizontal branch to organ at col11). Indeed organ A at row5 col11, so horizontal line from col6 to col11 filled with A. Row6 output: ". . . . . G . . . . . .". So G vertical continues down at col5. No horizontal yet. Row7 same. Row8 output: "G G G G G G . . . . .". Row8 originally had G at col0. ... [8966 chars truncated]
"Three stars in a constellation beam light downward through the void until each finds its orbiting planet, then wraps a ring of light around its orbital path."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three adjacent stars of different spectral colors shine at the top of a star chart. Lone planets of matching color drift at scattered positions in the void below.
Do: Each star projects a beam of light straight down through space. At the planet's orbital altitude, the light bends horizontally to reach the planet. A star with no planet shines to the edge of the chart.
Grid: The star chart keeps its dimensions. Void is black. Stars and planets remain; light beams and orbital arcs fill in.
"Three lighthouses on a clifftop each cast a beam down into the depths where a shipwreck bearing their colors lies; the light then sweeps the seabed to reach the wreck."
120b: k=3
See: Three adjacent lighthouses of different lamp colors stand at the sea cliff's edge. Shipwrecks bearing matching-colored hulls rest at scattered positions on the ocean floor.
Do: Each lighthouse drives its beam straight down into the water. At the wreck's depth, the beam refracts horizontally along the seabed until it illuminates the wreck. A lighthouse with no wreck pierces the full ocean depth.
Grid: The ocean cross-section is unchanged. Dark water is black. Lighthouses and wrecks stay put; light paths fill in.
We need to infer rule. From description: three adjacent lighthouses of different lamp colors stand at sea cliff edge. Shipwrecks bearing matching-colored hulls rest at scattered positions. Each lighthouse drives its beam straight down into water. At wreck's depth, beam refracts horizontally along seabed until it illuminates wreck. A lighthouse with no wreck pierces full ocean depth. Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells representing lighthouses (maybe at top row?) and wrecks (maybe elsewhere). The output fills vertical column from lighthouse down to wreck depth, then horizontal line from that depth to wreck column, filling with same color? Let's examine examples. Example1 input grid size 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input shows X at (row0,col4) (0-index). G at (0,5). A at (0,6). Also X at (4,0). A at (5,11). G at (8,0). Output shows many filled cells. Let's map coordinates. Use row index. Row0: col4 X, col5 G, col6 A. Row4: col0 X. Row5: col11 A. Row8: col0 G. Output rows: Row0 unchanged: X G A at same positions. Row1: X G A shifted? Row1: col4 X, col5 G, col6 A. So vertical line down from row0 to row3? Indeed rows0-3 have X G A at same columns. Rows0-3: same as row0. Row4: row4 output: X X X X X G A . . . . . . Wait row4 has X across columns0-4, then G at col5, A at col6. So at row4, the X lighthouse at col0 extends horizontally to col4? Actually there is a lighthouse X at (0,4) originally? Wait X at (0,4) is a lighthouse? Possibly. The X at (4,0) is a lighthouse? Let's think: Lighthouses are adjacent three of different colors. In example1, we have X G A adjacent horizontally at top row columns 4-6. Those are three adjacent lighthouses of different colors. Yes they are adjacent horizontally. So they are the three lighthouses. The wrecks are other colored cells elsewhere: X at (4,0) is a wreck of color X? Actually X is grey, could be wreck color. Also A at (5,11) is a wreck of color A. G at (8,0) is a wreck of color G. Thus rule: For each lighthouse color, find the wreck of same color (if any). Then draw vertical line from lighthouse down to the row of wreck (same column). Then from that point, draw horizontal line from that column to wreck column (same row). Fill with lighthouse color? In output, the vertical line uses the lighthouse color (X,G,A) downwards. Horizontal line uses same color as lighthouse? Let's check. For lighthouse X at column4 (row0). Wreck X at (4,0). So vertical line from (0,4) down to row4 at column4: rows0-4 col4 become X. Indeed rows0-4 col4 are X (row0 already X, rows1-4 X). Good. Then horizontal line from (4,4) to wreck at (4,0) across row4 columns0-4 become X. Indeed row4 columns0-4 are X. So that matches. For lighthouse G at column5 (row0). Wreck G at (8,0). Vertical line from (0,5) down to row8 col5 become G. Output rows0-8 col5 are G? Let's see: rows0-3 col5 G, row4 col5 G (already), row5 col5 G? Output row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Row5 col5 is G yes. Row6 col5 G? Row6 output: ". ... [7534 chars truncated]
"Three voltage sources on a circuit board's top rail send current down through traces until each finds a grounded component of matching impedance, then bridges to it."
120b: k=2
See: Three adjacent voltage sources of different colors sit on the top rail of a printed circuit board. Matching grounded components are soldered at scattered points below.
Do: Each source drives current straight down its trace. At the component's row, the trace turns horizontally to connect to the component. A source with no matching component runs its trace to the board's bottom edge.
Grid: The PCB layout is unchanged. Empty board is black. Sources and components remain; copper traces fill in.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with sources on top row? In description: three adjacent voltage sources of different colors sit on the top rail. Matching grounded components are scattered below. Each source drives current straight down its trace. At the component's row, the trace turns horizontally to connect to the component. A source with no matching component runs its trace to the board's bottom edge. So input grid: top row contains colored cells (non-black) representing sources. Below there are components of same colors somewhere. Need to draw vertical line from source down until row where component of same color exists; then fill horizontally from that column to component column? Actually "trace turns horizontally to connect to the component". Means at component's row, the vertical trace extends horizontally to the component's column (where component is located). So output should have a line of that color from source down to component row, then across to component column, maybe also fill component cell? In examples, let's verify. Example1 input grid size 12x12? Let's map coordinates. Input rows (0-index). Row0: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So at columns: 4 X (grey), 5 G (green), 6 A (azure). These are sources? According to description, three adjacent voltage sources of different colors sit on top rail. Here we have X, G, A adjacent? Yes columns 4,5,6 are adjacent. So sources are X,G,A. Components: there are matching grounded components scattered below. Look for X,G,A elsewhere in grid. Row4: "X . . . . . . . . . . ." column0 X component? Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . . A" column11 A component. Row8: "G . . . . . . . . . . ." column0 G component. So each source has a component somewhere below (maybe not same column). Output shows traces. Let's examine output grid for example1. Row0 unchanged: same as input. Row1: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So vertical trace from source down one row: at row1 columns 4,5,6 now have X,G,A (previously black). Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So at row4, we see a horizontal line of X from col0 to col4? Actually row4 originally had X at col0 only. Output row4 has X at cols0-4 (five X's). Also G at col5, A at col6 unchanged. This suggests that at row4, which is the row of component X (at col0), the vertical trace of X (source column4) reaches row4, then turns horizontally left to component at col0, filling X across. So horizontal line from source column4 to component column0 inclusive. Similarly for G: component at row8 col0. Let's see output rows 5-? Row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Row5 originally had ". . . . . . . . . . . . A". Wait row5 had A at col11 component. Output row5 shows G at col5? Actually row5 col5 is G (since column index 5). Row5 also shows A's from col6 to col11 (six A's). This suggests at row5 (component row for A at col11), the vertical trace of A (source column6) goes down to row5 then turns right to component at col11, filling A across columns6- ... [7957 chars truncated]
"Three gods seated on their thrones hurl divine chains into the mortal realm, each chain plunging earthward until it shackles a champion bearing that god's mark."
120b: k=2
See: Three adjacent deities of distinct divine auras sit enthroned at the top of the cosmos. Mortal champions branded with matching auras kneel at scattered locations below.
Do: Each god casts a chain straight downward through the heavens. When it reaches the champion's plane, the chain snakes horizontally to bind them. A god with no champion lets the chain fall to the underworld.
Grid: The cosmic plane retains its dimensions. Void is black. Thrones and champions remain; divine chains fill in.
We need to infer rule. From description: three adjacent deities at top, each with matching champions below. Chains go down then horizontally to champion. If no champion, chain falls to bottom (underworld). In grid, deities are top row? In examples, look at Example1. Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 columns, 12 rows. Let's map coordinates. Input shows top rows with some letters: row0: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So at columns 4 X (grey), 5 G (green), 6 A (azure). These are deities? They are adjacent? Yes X G A are adjacent horizontally. They are at top row. Champions are same colors somewhere below: G champion at row8 col0? Actually row8: "G . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at column0 row8. A champion? row5 col11 A (row5 col11). X champion? maybe none? In input row4 col0 X (row4 col0). That's X at row4 column0, not same column as deity. But champion should be same color as deity. Let's locate each color: G appears at (0,5) deity, and at (8,0) champion. A appears at (0,6) deity, and at (5,11) champion. X appears at (0,4) deity, and also at (4,0) X (maybe champion). Indeed X at (4,0) is champion for X deity? But not same column. Now output: we see chains: vertical line of X G A from row0 down to row4? Let's examine output rows. Row0 unchanged: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." Row1: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." Row3: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." Row4: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So at row4, columns 0-4 become X, column5 G, column6 A. So chain for X extends horizontally leftwards? Actually deity X at col4 row0, chain goes down to row4 (where champion X at col0). Then snakes horizontally to bind them: fill row4 columns 0-4 with X. That's what we see. For G deity at col5, champion at row8 col0. In output, we see column5 from rows0-8 filled with G (vertical). Row8: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." So at row8, columns 0-5 become G, connecting champion at col0 to column5 where chain meets. So vertical line of G from row0 to row8 at col5, then horizontal left to col0. For A deity at col6, champion at row5 col11. Output: row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Wait row5 col5 G? Actually row5 shows ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So column5 G? That's weird. Let's examine: row5 originally had A at col11. Output row5 shows G at col5? Actually column5 is index5 (0-based). Row5 col5 is G (maybe part of chain from G deity? but G chain already ended at row8). Wait row5 col5 G maybe from G horizontal line? But G horizontal line only at row8. So maybe row5 col5 is part of A chain vertical? Let's compute: A deity at col6 row0, vertical line down to row5 (where champion at col11). So column6 rows0-5 become A. Indeed output rows0-5 column6 are A. Row5 also has horizontal line from col6 to col11 filled with A. But output row5 shows " . . . . . G A A A A A A". There's a G at col5 before A chain. Why G? Maybe because G vertical line passes through row5 col5? Actually G vertical line is at col5 rows0-8, so at row5 col5 there is G. So overlapping: G vertical line and A horizontal li ... [10500 chars truncated]
"Three dancers at the top of the ballroom floor glide straight back in formation, then one by one peel off sideways to clasp the hand of a partner waiting at the edge."
120b: k=3
See: Three adjacent lead dancers in distinct costumes stand at the top of the dance floor. Solo partners in matching attire wait at scattered positions around the room.
Do: Each lead dancer moves straight down the floor. Upon reaching their partner's row, they chassé horizontally to join hands. A dancer with no partner glides all the way to the far wall.
Grid: The ballroom floor is unchanged. Empty floor is black. Leads and partners stay in place; dance paths fill in.
We need to infer rule. From description: three adjacent lead dancers at top, distinct costumes, solo partners scattered. Leads move straight down, upon reaching partner's row, they move horizontally to join. Dancer with no partner goes to far wall (bottom? far wall maybe rightmost column). Grid unchanged, empty floor black. Leads and partners stay in place; dance paths fill in. Interpretation: Input has three adjacent lead dancers at top row (distinct colors). In examples, top row contains three adjacent non-black cells? Let's examine Example1 input top row: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So at columns 5? Actually index starting 0: column4 X (grey), column5 G (green), column6 A (azure). These are three adjacent? Yes X G A are adjacent horizontally. They are distinct colors. So leads are X,G,A? But description says leads distinct costumes. Partners are same colors elsewhere? In example1, there are other G and A elsewhere: G at row8 col0, A at row5 col11. Also X appears at row4 col0. So each lead has a partner of same color somewhere else. The leads move down column until they reach the row of their partner, then move horizontally to that partner's column (chassé) to join. The path cells become that color? Output shows trails. Let's verify: For lead X at column4 (0-index). Partner X at row4 col0 (since input row4 col0 is X). So lead X moves down from row0 col4 to row4 (same row as partner). At row4, it moves horizontally left to column0 to join partner. Path: vertical line from (0,4) to (4,4) inclusive? Output shows column4 rows0-3 have X? Let's see output example1 rows0-3 column4: row0 col4 X (original), row1 col4 X, row2 col4 X, row3 col4 X. Yes. Row4 column0-4 become X X X X X (horizontal). Indeed output row4: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So horizontal line of X from col0 to col4. Good. Lead G at column5. Partner G at row8 col0? Actually input row8 col0 is G. So partner row8. Lead moves down column5 to row8, then horizontally left to col0. Output: column5 rows0-7 have G? Let's check output rows0-3 column5 G (yes). Row4 column5 G (since row4 col5 is G original). Row5 column5 G? Output row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So column5 row5 is G. Row6 column5 G? Output row6 column5 G? Row6 line: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." yes G. Row7 column5 G? Row7 line: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." yes G. Row8 row8 column0-? Output row8: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." So horizontal line from col0 to col5 (since lead at col5). Good. Lead A at column6. Partner A at row5 col11. So lead moves down column6 to row5, then horizontally right to col11. Output: column6 rows0-4 have A? Row0 col6 A, row1 col6 A, row2 col6 A, row3 col6 A, row4 col6 A (original). Row5 row5 columns6-11 become A A A A A A (including original at col11). Indeed output row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So horizontal right. Thus rule matches. Now Example2: Input top row: ". . . . . M X G . . . . . . ." So three adjacent leads? M X G are adjacent columns 5,6,7. Distinct colors. Partners: M appears at row4 col0 (M ... [8154 chars truncated]
"Three mineral veins exposed at a cliff face penetrate straight down through the rock strata until each meets a magma pocket of matching composition, then intrudes laterally into it."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three adjacent mineral veins of different colors are exposed at the top of a geological cross-section. Magma pockets of matching mineral color are trapped at various depths and positions in the rock.
Do: Each vein extends straight down through the strata. At the depth of its matching magma pocket, the vein intrudes horizontally to connect with it. A vein with no pocket extends to the base of the formation.
Grid: The cross-section dimensions are unchanged. Solid rock is black. Veins and pockets remain; intrusion paths fill in.
"Three spice dispensers mounted on a shelf drizzle their sauces down onto plates placed at various positions on the counter below."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A kitchen shelf holds three adjacent spice bottles at the top. Scattered on the counter below are single plates, each tinted to match one bottle's sauce color.
Do: Each bottle pours a stream of sauce straight down from the shelf. When the stream reaches the plate's level, it pools sideways across the counter until it touches the plate. Bottles with no plate below pour all the way to the floor.
Grid: The counter area retains its original size. Clean countertop is black. The shelf bottles and plates stay put; sauce streams and pools fill the gaps.
"Three tuning forks on a music stand resonate downward through the concert hall until they find their sympathetic strings, then hum across the row to meet them."
120b: k=2
See: Three adjacent tuning forks of different timbres sit atop a silent hall. Lone sympathetic strings are positioned elsewhere in the space, each matching one fork's pitch.
Do: Each fork sends its resonance vertically downward through the hall. At the depth where its sympathetic string waits, the vibration travels horizontally to reach the string. A fork with no matching string lets its tone carry to the bottom of the hall.
Grid: The hall dimensions are unchanged. Silence is black. Forks and strings stay fixed; resonance paths fill in.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with black '.' background. Some colored cells: In example1 input: positions: (row0 col4) X, (0,5) G, (0,6) A. Also (4,0) X. (5,11) A. (8,0) G. That's all. Output: many more colored cells. Let's map. Interpretation: "forks" are three adjacent tuning forks of different timbres sit atop a silent hall. "Lone sympathetic strings are positioned elsewhere in the space, each matching one fork's pitch." So forks are three adjacent cells horizontally? In example1, at top row we have X G A adjacent horizontally (col4-6). That's three adjacent different colors (X grey, G green, A azure). That's the three forks. Strings elsewhere: there is X at (4,0) (same color as first fork X), A at (5,11) (same as third fork A), G at (8,0) (same as second fork G). So each fork has a matching string somewhere else. Rule: Each fork sends resonance vertically downward through the hall. At the depth where its sympathetic string waits, the vibration travels horizontally to reach the string. A fork with no matching string lets its tone carry to the bottom of the hall. Thus for each fork column, we fill vertical line downwards from fork until either we reach row of matching string (same color) then we fill horizontally from that column to the string's column? Wait string may be elsewhere not same column. In example1, fork X at col4 row0. Matching string X at (4,0). So vertical line from (0,4) down to row4 (same column). At row4, we then travel horizontally to column0 (where string is). So we fill cells along that path: vertical cells (rows0-4 col4) become X? In output, column4 rows0-4 are X indeed. Also row4 columns0-4 become X (horizontal). Indeed output row4: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So row4 col0-4 X. Similarly fork G at col5 row0, matching string G at (8,0). So vertical line from row0 to row8 col5 becomes G. Output: column5 rows0-8 are G? Let's check: output rows0-3 col5 G yes. Row4 col5 G (since row4 already X row? Actually row4 col5 is G from original? In output row4 col5 is G (since row4 had "X X X X X G A ..."). Row5 col5? Output row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So row5 col5 G. Row6 col5 G? Output row6: ". . . . . G . . . . . .". Yes. Row7 col5 G. Row8 col5 G? Output row8: "G G G G G G . . . . .". Row8 col5 G indeed. Then at row8, we need horizontal to column0 (string at (8,0)). So row8 columns0-5 become G. Indeed row8 col0-5 G. Fork A at col6 row0, matching string A at (5,11). So vertical line from row0 to row5 col6 becomes A. Output: column6 rows0-5 A? Row0 col6 A yes. Row1 col6? Output row1: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." Wait row1 col6 is A? Actually row1 line: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So col4 X, col5 G, col6 A. So yes A. Row2 col6 A? Row2 line: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." same. Row3 same. Row4 col6 A? Row4 line: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." col6 A. Row5 col6 A? Row5 line: ". . . . . G A A A A A A" col6 A (first A after G). So vertical line done. At row5, horizontal to column11 (string). So row5 columns6-11 bec ... [7605 chars truncated]
"Three relay runners at the starting blocks sprint down their lanes, then cut sideways across the track to hand off batons to teammates waiting in the stands."
120b: fail
See: Three runners line up adjacently in the top row. Lone teammates sit scattered in the arena, each wearing a jersey matching one runner's color.
Do: Each runner charges straight down their lane. Upon reaching the row of their teammate, they dash horizontally across to deliver the baton. A runner with no teammate sprints to the far end of the track.
Grid: The arena keeps its dimensions. Empty track is black. Runners and teammates stay in place; sprint paths fill between them.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with runners (top row three adjacent?) In description: three runners line up adjacently in top row. Lone teammates scattered. Each runner charges straight down their lane. Upon reaching row of their teammate, they dash horizontally across to deliver baton. Runner with no teammate sprints to far end of track. Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells representing runners (maybe top row adjacent colors) and teammates (same color elsewhere). Output fills paths: vertical lines from runner down to teammate row, then horizontal line from teammate to maybe other side? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 12x12? Actually lines show 12 columns. Let's map coordinates. Use row index 0 top. Input Example1 rows (I'll index columns 0-11): Row0: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row1: all . Row2: . Row3: . Row4: X . . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . A Row6: . Row7: . Row8: G . . . . . . . . . . . Row9-11 all . So runners: top row has X G A adjacent? Actually positions: col4 X (grey), col5 G (green), col6 A (azure). They are adjacent three cells. So three runners colors: X, G, A. Teammates: scattered: there is X at row4 col0, G at row8 col0, A at row5 col11. Also maybe others? That's it. Now output: Let's see rows. Output rows: Row0: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row1: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row2: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row3: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row4: X X X X X G A . . . . . Row5: . . . . . G A A A A A A Row6: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row8: G G G G G G . . . . . . Row9-11 unchanged all . Interpretation: For each runner: - Runner X at col4: teammate X at row4 col0. Path: vertical line from runner down to row4 (same column col4) filled with X? Indeed rows0-4 col4 have X (row0 already X, rows1-4 X). That's vertical line. Then horizontal line from teammate location (row4 col0) to runner column? Actually row4 now has X across columns 0-4 (five X). So horizontal line from teammate (col0) to runner column (col4) filled with X. So path forms an L shape: vertical down from runner to teammate row, then horizontal left to teammate. - Runner G at col5: teammate G at row8 col0. Output: vertical line from row0-8 col5 filled with G? Let's see rows0-8 col5: row0 G, row1 G, row2 G, row3 G, row4 G, row5 G, row6 G, row7 G, row8 G (yes). Horizontal line at row8 from col0 to col5 filled with G (row8 columns0-5 G). Indeed row8 shows G G G G G G. - Runner A at col6: teammate A at row5 col11. Output: vertical line from row0-5 col6 filled with A? rows0-5 col6: row0 A, row1 A, row2 A, row3 A, row4 A, row5 A (yes). Horizontal line at row5 from col6 to col11 filled with A (row5 columns6-11 A). Indeed row5 shows . . . . . G A A A A A A (col5 G from previous vertical, col6 A start, then A across to col11). Good. Thus rule: For each runner in top row (adjacent three cells), find its teammate of same color elsewhere (anywhere). Draw vertical line of that color from runner down to the ... [7297 chars truncated]
"Three clouds bunched at the top of the sky release colored rain that falls until it hits a matching seed crystal, then spreads as fog along that altitude."
120b: k=2
See: Three adjacent storm clouds of distinct hues hover at the sky's ceiling. Isolated seed crystals matching each cloud's color float at various altitudes and positions.
Do: Each cloud releases rain straight down. When the rain meets its seed crystal's altitude, it disperses horizontally as fog until it engulfs the crystal. A cloud with no seed crystal rains all the way to the ground.
Grid: Sky dimensions are preserved. Clear air is black. Clouds and crystals remain; rain columns and fog bands fill in.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with black '.' background. There are three adjacent storm clouds of distinct hues (clouds) and seed crystals matching each cloud's color at various positions. Clouds are contiguous? In example1 input: we see G at (row0,col4?) Actually grid coordinates: Let's index rows. Example1 Input (12x12?). Let's write rows with indices. Row0: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: all . Row4: X . . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . A Row6: all . Row7: all . Row8: G . . . . . . . . . . . Row9-11 all . So we have three clouds? Colors: X (grey), G (green), A (azure). They appear as single cells? Cloud maybe vertical line? Actually clouds are "adjacent" meaning three adjacent columns? In output we see columns of rain and fog. Output shows many X, G, A forming shapes. Let's examine output row0: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row1: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row2: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row3: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row4: X X X X X G A . . . . . Row5: . . . . . G A A A A A A Row6: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row8: G G G G G G . . . . . . Rows9-11 unchanged. Interpretation: Clouds are at positions: column4 X, column5 G, column6 A (adjacent horizontally). They are "clouds". Seed crystals: there is X at (row4,col0) and A at (row5,col11) and G at (row8,col0). Those are seeds matching each cloud color. Rule: For each cloud column, rain falls straight down from cloud cell (i.e., fill column below cloud with same color until reaching seed altitude). When reaches same row as seed of same color, then spreads horizontally (fog) across that row, filling cells with that color until it engulfs the seed (i.e., reaches seed column). After that maybe continues? Let's test. Cloud X at col4 row0. Seed X at (row4,col0). Rain column: from row0 downwards fill X until row4? In output, column4 rows0-4 are X (yes). At row4, also horizontal spread: row4 columns0-4 become X (fog) until reaching seed at col0. Indeed row4 col0-4 are X. After that, does rain continue below? No, after reaching seed, maybe stops? In output, below row4 column4 there is no X (rows5+ column4 is .). So rain stops at seed row. Cloud G at col5 row0. Seed G at (row8,col0). Rain column: column5 rows0-8 become G? Output shows column5 rows0-4 G, row5 column5 G, row6 G, row7 G, row8 G? Let's see: row5 column5 is G (yes). Row6 column5 G, row7 column5 G, row8 column5? Row8 column5 is G (since row8 has G G G G G G across columns0-5). So column5 rows0-8 are G. At row8, horizontal spread across row8 columns0-5 become G, reaching seed at col0. After that, no more G below. Cloud A at col6 row0. Seed A at (row5,col11). Rain column: column6 rows0-5 become A? Output shows column6 rows0-4 A, row5 column6 A (yes). At row5, horizontal spread across row5 columns6-11 become A, reaching seed at col11. After that, no more A below. Thus rule matches. Now Example2. Input size 15x15. Clouds? Look for three adjacent colors: M, ... [7691 chars truncated]
"Three pillars in a colonnade extend their foundations downward and throw flying buttresses sideways to brace against keystones embedded in distant walls."
120b: k=3
See: Three adjacent decorative pillars crown the top of a building facade. Keystones matching each pillar's stone color are embedded at various points in the surrounding walls.
Do: Each pillar drives its foundation straight down through the structure. At the keystone's level, a flying buttress extends horizontally to meet it. A pillar with no keystone extends its foundation to the building's base.
Grid: The facade dimensions stay the same. Empty space is black. Pillars and keystones stay put; foundations and buttresses fill in.
We need to infer rule. From description: pillars are three adjacent decorative pillars crown top of building facade. Keystones matching each pillar's stone color are embedded at various points in surrounding walls. Each pillar drives its foundation straight down through structure. At keystone's level, a flying buttress extends horizontally to meet it. A pillar with no keystone extends its foundation to building's base. Interpretation: Input grid has pillars (maybe three adjacent cells of same color at top row?). In examples, look at Example1 input: top row: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So there is a sequence X G A adjacent? Actually X (grey), G (green), A (azure) are three adjacent cells (positions 5,6,7). Those are pillars? Colors differ. They are "pillars" each with its own color. Keystones are same colors elsewhere in grid. In example1, there are other G at row9 col1? Actually row9: "G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's a G keystone. Also A at row6 col12? Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . A" That's A keystone. X at row5 col1? Row5: "X . . . . . . . . . . ." That's X keystone. So each pillar color has a keystone somewhere else. Transformation: For each pillar, draw vertical line (foundation) down from pillar position until reaching the row of its keystone. At that row, draw horizontal line (buttress) from that column to the keystone column? Actually "flying buttress extends horizontally to meet it." So at keystone's level, a horizontal line from the pillar column to the keystone column, filling cells between inclusive? In output example1, let's examine. Input coordinates: Let's index rows 1-12, cols 1-12. Pillars at row1 col5 X, col6 G, col7 A. Keystones: X at row5 col1. G at row9 col1. A at row6 col12. Now output: Row1 unchanged same as input (top). Row2: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So row2 now has X G A at cols5-7? Actually row2 shows X at col5, G at col6, A at col7. So foundation extended down one row for each pillar (vertical). Row3 same as row2. Row4 same. Row5: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So row5 has X across cols1-5? Actually row5 shows X X X X X G A ... So at row5 (keystone row for X), we have horizontal line from col1 (keystone) to col5 (pillar column). Indeed X at col1 (keystone) and pillar column is col5, so fill cols1-5 with X. Also G and A remain at col6,7 (pillars). Row6: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Row6 is keystone row for A (row6 col12). Horizontal line from pillar col7 to keystone col12 filled with A. Indeed columns7-12 are A. Also G at col6 unchanged. Row7: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." Row7 is below row6 but above G keystone row9. It shows vertical line for G at col6. Row8 same. Row9: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." Row9 is keystone row for G at col1. Horizontal line from col1 to pillar col6 filled with G. So rule matches. Also note that after reaching keystone row, vertical line stops (no further down). For pillar with no keystone, foundation goes to bottom (example2 maybe). Let's examine example2. Example2 input: grid 15x15. Pillars? Top row ... [7688 chars truncated]
"Three siege towers at the rampart lower drawbridges straight down the castle wall, then roll battering rams across the courtyard to breach gates bearing their insignia."
120b: fail
See: Three adjacent siege towers sit atop the fortress wall. Lone gates marked with each tower's heraldic color are embedded in walls throughout the courtyard.
Do: Each tower drops a drawbridge vertically down the wall face. At the gate's level, a battering ram extends horizontally to strike the matching gate. A tower with no gate drops its bridge all the way to the dungeon floor.
Grid: The fortress layout is unchanged. Empty courtyard is black. Towers and gates remain; drawbridges and rams fill in.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with some colored cells (non-black). In description: three adjacent siege towers atop fortress wall. Towers are maybe vertical columns of same color? Gates are colored cells embedded in walls throughout courtyard. Drawbridge drops vertically down from tower, and at gate level a horizontal ram extends to strike matching gate. Tower with no gate drops bridge to floor. Interpretation: Input has towers (maybe vertical line of same color at top row?) and gates (colored cells elsewhere). Output adds vertical lines (drawbridge) from tower downwards until reaching gate row, then horizontal line (ram) from that point to the right (or left?) covering until maybe edge or until another tower? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Looks 12x12? Let's index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input Example1 non-black cells: Row0: col4 X, col5 G, col6 A Row4: col0 X Row5: col11 A Row8: col0 G So we have three towers? Possibly at top row: X G A at columns 4,5,6. That's three adjacent towers (colors X,G,A). Gates: there are X at row4 col0, A at row5 col11, G at row8 col0. So each tower color matches a gate somewhere else. Output Example1: Let's see added cells. Rows: 0 unchanged: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row1: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row2: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row3: . . . . X G A . . . . . Row4: X X X X X G A . . . . . Row5: . . . . . G A A A A A A Row6: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row8: G G G G G G . . . . . . Rows9-11 unchanged empty. Interpretation: For tower X (col4) vertical line from row0 down to row4 (gate row) inclusive? Actually gate X at row4 col0, not same column. Wait tower X at col4, gate X at row4 col0. In output, we see vertical line of X from rows0-4 at column4? Actually column4 has X in rows0-4 (yes). That's drawbridge. At row4, horizontal line of X extends leftwards from col4 to col0 (gate location). Indeed row4 columns0-4 are X. So horizontal ram from tower column to gate column. Similarly tower G at col5, gate G at row8 col0. Output: vertical G from rows0-8 at column5 (rows0-8 have G). At row8, horizontal G from col5 left to col0 (row8 col0-5 are G). Also note at row5 there is something: row5 col5 G (vertical) and also row5 col6 A? Wait row5 output: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Let's parse: columns: 0-4 '.'; col5 G (vertical); col6 A (tower A vertical?) Actually tower A at col6, gate A at row5 col11. Output shows vertical A from rows0-5 at col6? Let's see rows0-5 col6: row0 col6 A, row1 col6 A, row2 col6 A, row3 col6 A, row4 col6 A, row5 col6 A (yes). So vertical A line down to row5 (gate row). At row5, horizontal A extends from col6 to col11 (gate location). Indeed row5 columns6-11 are A. Thus rule: For each colored cell in top row (tower), find matching colored cell elsewhere (gate). Draw vertical line of that color from tower down to the row of the gate (same column as tower). Then draw horizontal line from that point (gate row, tower column) to the gate col ... [5885 chars truncated]
"Three spotlights on the lighting rig cast beams straight down to the stage, then sweep sideways to find their featured actors waiting in the wings."
120b: fail
See: Three adjacent spotlights of different colors are mounted at the top of the stage. Solo actors dressed in matching colors stand at scattered positions on and off stage.
Do: Each spotlight casts its beam vertically downward. When the beam reaches the actor's row, it sweeps horizontally to illuminate the actor. A spotlight with no actor shines its beam all the way to the orchestra pit.
Grid: The stage area is unchanged. Darkness is black. Spotlights and actors stay in place; light beams fill in.
We need to infer rule. From description: three adjacent spotlights at top of stage (three columns?) Different colors. Actors (matching colors) scattered. Each spotlight casts beam vertically down. When beam reaches actor's row, it sweeps horizontally to illuminate the actor. A spotlight with no actor shines its beam all the way to the orchestra pit (bottom). Grid unchanged stage area; darkness black; spotlights and actors stay; light beams fill in. Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells (actors) and maybe some "spotlights" at top row? In examples, top row contains some colored cells and maybe X (grey) representing spotlight? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 columns, 12 rows. Top row: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So there is X at column5, G at col6, A at col7. Those are three adjacent? X G A are adjacent columns 5,6,7. Colors: X=grey (spotlight?), G=green, A=azure. According to description, three adjacent spotlights of different colors. So X, G, A are spotlights. Actors are same colors elsewhere: there are G at row9 col1? Actually row9 (index starting 1) has "G . . . . . . . . . . ." So a green actor at column1 row9. Also A at row6 col12? Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . A" (col12). Also maybe other G? Row1 also has G at col6 (spotlight). So actors are same colors as spotlights but placed elsewhere. Now output: beams fill vertical columns from each spotlight down until reaching row of actor, then horizontal line to actor. Let's test: Spotlight X at col5 (grey). In output, column5 from row1 down to row5 become X? Actually output rows: row1 unchanged: col5 X. Row2: col5 X (added). Row3: col5 X. Row4: col5 X. Row5: row5 is "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So row5 col5 X, plus leftwards fill? Wait row5 originally "X . . . . . . . . . . ." (col1 X). Actually input row5: "X . . . . . . . . . . ." So there is an X at col1 row5 (maybe actor? but X is grey, same as spotlight color). But description says actors match colors of spotlights. So there is a grey actor at row5 col1. So the X spotlight at col5 will beam down until row5 (where there is a grey actor at col1). At that row, it sweeps horizontally to illuminate the actor at col1. So row5 columns 1-5 become X. Indeed output row5 shows X X X X X (col1-5). Good. Similarly, spotlight G at col6. There is a green actor at row9 col1. So beam goes down column6 until row9, then horizontal left to col1. Output rows: rows1-4 column6 G? Row1 already G. Row2 col6 G added. Row3 col6 G added. Row4 col6 G added. Row5 col6 G (already G). Row6 col6 G? Output row6: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". Row6 col6 G, yes. Row7 col6 G? Output row7: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." So yes column6 G continues down to row9? Row8 col6 G? Output row8: ". . . . . G . . . . . .". Row9 row9: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." So at row9, horizontal fill across row9 from col1 to col6 (green). So matches. Spotlight A at col7. There is azure actor at row6 col12. Beam down column7 until row6, then horizontal right to col12. Output rows: ... [9219 chars truncated]
"Three seeds planted side by side on a garden wall send roots plunging down through the soil until they taste a matching mineral vein, then spread along it."
120b: k=2
See: Three adjacent seeds of different varieties sit at the top of a soil cross-section. Mineral deposits matching each seed's needs are buried at various depths and horizontal positions.
Do: Each seed sends a taproot straight down through the earth. When the root hits the depth of its mineral deposit, it branches laterally to absorb it. A seed with no matching mineral sends its root to bedrock.
Grid: The soil profile stays the same size. Empty soil is black. Seeds and minerals stay fixed; root paths fill in.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with seeds at top row? In description: three adjacent seeds of different varieties sit at top of soil cross-section. Minerals at various depths/horizontal positions. Each seed sends taproot straight down; when root hits depth of its mineral deposit, it branches laterally to absorb it. Seed with no matching mineral sends root to bedrock. Interpretation: Input grid contains seeds (colored cells) at top row? In example1 input: top row: ". . . . X G A . . . . ." So there is X (grey) at column5, G at col6, A at col7. Those are three adjacent seeds? They are adjacent horizontally (col5-7). Colors: X, G, A. In description seeds of different varieties; minerals matching each seed's needs are buried at various depths and horizontal positions. So minerals are same colors as seeds? In example1, there are other G and A cells elsewhere: row9 col1 has G; row6 col12 has A; row5 col1 has X. So each seed color appears elsewhere as mineral deposit. Goal: draw vertical line from each seed downwards (taproot) until reaching the row where its mineral deposit exists (same color). At that depth, branch laterally (horizontal line) to absorb mineral deposit(s). The output shows lines of that color connecting seed to mineral deposit. Let's verify. Example1 output: Let's map coordinates (0-index). Input size 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Seeds at row0 col4 X, col5 G, col6 A. Mineral deposits: X at row4 col0 (since row4: "X . . . . . . . . . . .") yes X at (4,0). G at row8 col0 (row8: "G . . . . . . . . . . .") yes G at (8,0). A at row5 col11 (row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . . A") yes A at (5,11). Also maybe other A? row0 col6 is seed A. Now output: Let's see column4 (X seed). Output rows 0-3 column4 have X? Row0 col4 X unchanged. Row1 col4 X (added). Row2 col4 X. Row3 col4 X. Row4 row4 col0-4 are X X X X X (horizontal line from col0 to col4). So vertical line from seed down to row4 (where mineral X at col0). At row4, horizontal line extends left to mineral at col0. So matches. For G seed column5: output rows0-3 col5 G (vertical). Row4 col5 G (vertical continues). Row5 row5 col5 G? Actually output row5: ". . . . . G A A A A A A". So col5 G, then A's start at col6 onward. Row6 col5 G (vertical). Row7 col5 G. Row8 row8: "G G G G G G . . . . . ." So at row8, horizontal line from col0 to col5 (including seed column5) connecting to mineral G at col0. So vertical line from seed down to row8, then horizontal leftwards. For A seed column6: output rows0-3 col6 A vertical. Row4 col6 A? row4 output: "X X X X X G A . . . . ." So col6 A present. Row5 row5 col6 A (starting horizontal line). Row5 has A's from col6 to col11 (rightwards) connecting to mineral at col11. So horizontal line to right. Thus rule: For each seed (colored cell) in top row (maybe any row?), draw vertical line of same color downwards until reaching the row that contains a mineral of same color somewhere else (maybe the first occurrence below?). ... [6408 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains a single vertical column of yellow (Y) cells that divides the grid into two equal halves: a left half and a right half. The left half contains azure (A) cells and black (.) background cells. The right half contains grey (X) cells and black (.) background cells.
Do: Remove the yellow divider column and compare the left and right halves cell by cell. For each position, apply an XOR rule: if exactly one of the two sides has a colored cell (A on the left or X on the right) and the other side is black (.), output red (R). If both sides have a colored cell or both sides are black, output black (.). The result is a grid with only red (R) and black (.) cells.
Grid: The output grid has the same number of rows as the input and a width equal to half the input width minus the divider column. For example, a 5×9 input with a 1-cell-wide divider produces a 5×4 output. The background is black (.) and the only foreground color is red (R).
"A curtain divides two dancers, and the spotlight finds whoever dances alone."
120b: k=3
See: A golden curtain hangs down the center of a stage, splitting it into two wings. In the left wing, azure performers take their positions among empty squares. In the right wing, grey performers mirror the same stage layout. The black squares are darkness — empty stage floor.
Do: Raise the curtain and let the two troupes face each other. Wherever a performer on one side finds only darkness across from them — no partner, no mirror — a red spotlight ignites on that square, marking the lonesome dancer. But where two performers lock eyes across the divide, or where darkness meets darkness, the stage stays dark. The spotlight only loves the unmatched.
Grid: The curtain vanishes and the two wings collapse into one stage. What remains is a smaller floor plan lit only by red spotlights where solitary dancers stood, surrounded by the darkness of matched pairs and empty silence.
We need to infer rule. From description: golden curtain down center splitting into two wings. Left wing azure performers (A) among empty squares (.) . Right wing grey performers (X) mirror same stage layout. So input grid has left side with A and . and right side with X and .? Also Y appears maybe as something else? In examples, Y appears as a column maybe representing curtain? Let's examine Example1 input dimensions: 5 rows, 9 columns? Let's count first row: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9. So curtain column is Y? Yes Y column in middle. Left side columns before Y are left wing, right side after Y are right wing. The left wing contains A and . (azure and black). Right wing contains X and . (grey and black). Possibly also other colors but not in examples. The rule: compare each row left side pattern with right side pattern mirrored across curtain? "mirror the same stage layout" meaning right wing is mirror of left wing? Actually description: right wing performers mirror the same stage layout. So the pattern of A's on left side is mirrored as X's on right side? In input, we see X's placed where A's are mirrored? Let's test Example1: Row1 left of Y: ". A . ." positions columns 1-4. Right of Y: ". X X ." columns 6-9. Mirror of left across Y would be reversed order: columns 1-4 reversed = ". . A ." (since left pattern . A . . reversed is . . A .). Right side actual: . X X . . Wait there are 4 columns after Y? Actually after Y there are ". X X ." that's 4 columns. Mirror of left: . . A . ; but we have . X X . . Not matching. Let's map: maybe X corresponds to A positions but not mirrored? Let's list left A positions: column2. Right side X positions: columns7 and8? Actually columns after Y: col6 '.' col7 'X' col8 'X' col9 '.' So X at col7 and8. Not matching. Maybe rule: For each row, compare left side A pattern with right side X pattern directly (same column offset from curtain). If left has A and right has X at same offset, they are matched pair and become dark (.) in output. If left has A but right has . (no partner) then output red at that left position? But output grid is smaller (collapsed). Output dimensions are 5 rows, 4 columns (since curtain removed and wings collapsed). Indeed output examples have 4 columns. So they collapse left and right wings into one by overlaying: For each row, compare left side cell and right side cell (mirrored?) and produce a single cell in output: If exactly one of them is a performer (A or X) and the other is empty (.), output R (red). If both are performers (A and X) or both empty, output . (black). That matches description: "where a performer on one side finds only darkness across from them — no partner, no mirror — a red spotlight ignites on that square". So output cell corresponds to that position (maybe left side position). The output grid size equals number of rows x number of columns left of curtain (or right). In examples, left side columns count = 4 (since total 9 columns, Y at column5). Output col ... [3364 chars truncated]
"A membrane separates two colonies of cells. Only the mutations unique to one side survive the selection pressure."
120b: k=2
See: A vertical membrane of yellow tissue divides two populations — azure organisms on the left, grey organisms on the right — scattered across a black petri dish.
Do: Dissolve the membrane and perform differential selection: wherever one colony has a living cell and the other has empty medium, a red mutant emerges. Where both thrive or both are barren, nothing survives.
Grid: The output is a half-width dish showing only red mutants against black medium.
We need to infer rule. From description: vertical membrane of yellow tissue divides two populations — azure organisms on left, grey organisms on right — scattered across a black petri dish. So input grid contains Y column(s) representing membrane? In examples, Y appears as a vertical line? Let's examine Example1 input grid (9 columns? Let's count). Example1 Input lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." "A A . A Y X . . X" "A A . . Y X . . X" ". A . A Y . . X ." ". . A . Y . X . X" Let's write as matrix 5 rows, 9 columns. Y appears at column 5 (0-index 4) consistently across rows: yes each row has Y at column5. So vertical membrane column of Y. Left side (columns 1-4) have A (azure) and . (black). Right side (columns 6-9) have X (grey) and . etc. Goal: dissolve membrane and perform differential selection: wherever one colony has a living cell and the other has empty medium, a red mutant emerges. Where both thrive or both are barren, nothing survives. Interpretation: For each row? Or for each column? Probably compare left side vs right side at same row? "wherever one colony has a living cell and the other has empty medium" meaning compare left cell and right cell at same position relative to membrane? Since membrane is vertical, we can pair cells symmetric across membrane? For each row, we have left side cells at positions left of Y, and right side cells at positions right of Y. Need to align them maybe by distance from membrane. So column offset: column 4 left of Y (immediately left) pairs with column 6 (immediately right). Next left column 3 pairs with column7, etc. So we compare each pair across Y. If one side has a living cell (A or X?) Actually azure organisms on left, grey on right. So living cells are A on left, X on right. Empty medium is . (black). So rule: For each pair, if exactly one side is a living cell (A or X) and the other is ., output R at that position (maybe on left side? Output grid is half-width dish showing only red mutants against black medium. So output only includes left half? Let's see output dimensions: Example1 output is 5 rows, 4 columns (half width). Indeed original width 9, membrane column removed, right side maybe discarded, output width = number of columns left of Y (4). Output shows R where red mutants appear, else . (black). So we need to compute for each left cell position: look at its counterpart on right side (same distance from membrane). If exactly one of the two cells is a living cell (A on left, X on right) and the other is ., then output R at that left position. Otherwise output . (black). Also maybe if both have living cells (A and X) or both empty, output . (nothing survives). Let's test with Example1. Let's compute. Create rows with left columns (1-4) and right columns (6-9). We'll index. Row1: Input: ". A . . Y . X X ." Columns: 1 '.';2 'A';3 '.';4 '.';5 Y;6 '.';7 'X';8 'X';9 '.' Left side: [.,A,.,.] Right side: [.,X,X,.] (col6-9) Now compare each pair: pair0: left col4? Wait distance: imme ... [10325 chars truncated]
"A golden meridian divides two star charts. Red nebulae glow only where one chart shows a star and the other shows void."
120b: k=1
See: A vertical yellow meridian splits the sky. Azure stars dot the left hemisphere; grey stars dot the right. Black is the void of space.
Do: Overlay the hemispheres and look for asymmetry: where one hemisphere has a star and the other has void, a red nebula ignites. Where both have stars or both are void, darkness persists.
Grid: A half-width star chart with red nebulae and black void.
We need to infer rule. Input grid seems larger than output. In example, input 5 rows? Let's count. Example1 Input lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." "A A . A Y X . . X" "A A . . Y X . . X" ". A . A Y . . X ." ". . A . Y . X . X" That's 5 rows, each 9 columns. Output: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So transformation reduces width from 9 to 4. Likely overlay left and right halves across vertical yellow meridian (column with Y). The description: vertical yellow meridian splits sky. Azure stars left hemisphere; grey stars right. Black void. Overlay hemispheres and look for asymmetry: where one hemisphere has a star and other void, a red nebula ignites. Where both have stars or both void, darkness persists. Thus we have a vertical line of Y (yellow) that splits grid into left and right halves. Input includes Y column(s). In example, there is a column of Y? Let's locate Y positions. Row1: ". A . . Y . X X ." Y at column5 (1-index). Row2: column5 Y. Row3 column5 Y. Row4 column5 Y. Row5 column5 Y. So a vertical line of Y at column5 across all rows. So left side columns 1-4 are left hemisphere, right side columns 6-9 are right hemisphere (since column5 is the meridian). Left hemisphere contains azure A and maybe black . . etc. Right hemisphere contains X (grey) and maybe . etc. Goal: overlay left and right halves: align them column-wise? Probably compare each cell left vs corresponding cell right (mirrored across meridian). Since left side width = 4, right side width = 4. So we compare left column1 with right column9? Or column6? Need to think: overlay meaning bring them together, maybe superimpose such that leftmost aligns with rightmost? But description: "where one hemisphere has a star and the other has void, a red nebula ignites." So we need to produce output grid of same height but width equal to half (maybe 4). Output cells are red where asymmetry (one star, one void). Darkness (black) where both same (both stars or both void). In output we see only '.' and 'R'. '.' is black (void). So output cells are '.' for darkness, 'R' for red nebula. Thus we need to map each pair of cells (left, right) to output cell. Determine which positions correspond. Let's compute for example to deduce mapping. Create left matrix (4 columns) and right matrix (4 columns). Right side columns 6-9: columns 6,7,8,9. Row1: columns: 1 '.';2 'A';3 '.';4 '.';5 Y;6 '.';7 'X';8 'X';9 '.'. Left: . A . . Right: . X X . Now output row1: ". . R .". That's 4 columns. Let's see which positions are R. Output col1 '.'; col2 '.'; col3 'R'; col4 '.'. So only third position is R. Now compare left vs right cells maybe aligned same column index? Let's pair left col1 with right col1 (col6). left '.' vs right '.' => both void => darkness '.' (matches output col1 '.') Left col2 'A' (star) vs right col2 'X' (star) => both stars => darkness '.' (output col2 '.') Left col3 '.' vs right col3 'X' => void vs star => asymmetry => shou ... [2840 chars truncated]
"A golden reef divides two lagoons. Red coral grows only where one lagoon holds a pearl and the other holds empty water."
120b: k=2
See: A vertical yellow reef splits the sea. Azure pearls rest on the left seabed; grey pearls on the right. Black is open water.
Do: Dive past the reef and compare the two floors: wherever one lagoon has a pearl and the other has open water, red coral blooms. Where both have pearls or both are empty, the seabed stays dark.
Grid: A half-width seabed of red coral and black water.
We need to decode puzzle. Input grids have colors: . black, A azure, Y yellow, X grey, maybe others. Output grids only have . and R? In examples output contains . and R only. So rule produces red coral (R) where condition met, else black (.) maybe. Metaphor: vertical yellow reef splits sea. So column of Y acts as divider. Left side azure pearls (A) on left seabed; grey pearls (X) on right. Black is open water (.). Need to "compare the two floors": wherever one lagoon has a pearl and the other has open water, red coral blooms. Where both have pearls or both empty, seabed stays dark. Interpretation: For each row, we have left side (columns left of Y column) and right side (columns right of Y). The left side contains A (pearls) and . (open water). Right side contains X (pearls) and . (open water). Need to compare per row? Or per column? "wherever one lagoon has a pearl and the other has open water" suggests per row, compare left and right cells at same relative position? But left and right have different widths maybe? The description: "A half-width seabed of red coral and black water." Means output grid is half-width (only one side?) Actually output examples have fewer columns than input. Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions: Let's count columns. Row1: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9 columns. Row2: "A A . A Y X . . X" also 9. So 9 columns. Output rows: Row1 ". . R ." that's 4 columns. So output width is 4. So they reduced to half width (maybe left side only). Indeed after splitting by Y column, left side columns before Y are 4 columns (since Y at column5). Right side after Y are 4 columns (col6-9). Output width 4 corresponds to comparing left and right columns per row, producing a result per column (maybe per position). For each row, for each column index i (1..4), look at left cell (col i) and right cell (col (5 + i))? Actually Y at col5, right side starts col6. So mapping: left col1 maps to right col6, left col2 to right col7, left col3 to right col8, left col4 to right col9. Then rule: if one is pearl (A on left, X on right) and other is open water (.) then output R. If both pearls (A and X) or both open water (.) then output . (dark). Let's test with Example1. Write rows with left and right pairs. Row1 input: cols:1 '.';2 'A';3 '.';4 '.';5 Y;6 '.';7 'X';8 'X';9 '.' Pairs: i1: left '.' right '.' => both open => output '.' (matches output row1 col1 '.' yes) i2: left 'A' right 'X' => both pearls => output '.' (output row1 col2 '.' yes) i3: left '.' right 'X' => left open, right pearl => output R (output row1 col3 'R' yes) i4: left '.' right '.' => both open => '.' (output row1 col4 '.' yes) Row1 output ". . R .": matches. Row2: Input: "A A . A Y X . . X" Left cols1-4: A A . A Right cols6-9: X . . X Pairs: 1: A vs X => both pearls => . 2: A vs . => pearl vs open => R (output row2 col2 is R) yes. 3: . vs . => . (output row2 col3 '.' yes) 4: A vs X => both pearls => . (output row2 col4 '.' yes) ... [4197 chars truncated]
"Two signal lines feed into a gate separated by a golden bus. The output fires red only when the inputs disagree."
120b: k=4
See: A yellow bus line runs vertically through the circuit. Azure signals pulse on the left traces; grey signals pulse on the right. Black is no signal.
Do: Route both signals through the gate: where one input is high and the other is low, the output fires red. Where both are high or both are low, the output stays dark.
Grid: A half-width output register of red-fired and black-dormant cells.
We need to infer rule. The description: "yellow bus line runs vertically through the circuit. Azure signals pulse on the left traces; grey signals pulse on the right. Black is no signal. What to do: Route both signals through the gate: where one input is high and the other is low, the output fires red. Where both are high or both are low, the output stays dark. Grid details: A half-width output register of red-fired and black-dormant cells." Interpretation: Input grid contains azure (A) and grey (X) signals, plus yellow Y vertical line, maybe representing bus line. Output is red R where XOR of left and right signals? The bus line Y runs vertically through the circuit, maybe indicates column(s) where we compute? Let's examine examples. We have input grids of size? Example1 input appears 5 rows, 9 columns? Let's count: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9 columns. Output is 5 rows, 4 columns. So output width is half of input width? "half-width output register". Input width 9 -> output width 4 (floor(9/2)?). Indeed half of 9 is 4.5, maybe floor? Output width 4. So mapping: each output cell corresponds to a pair of columns? Likely left and right signals around the central Y column (bus). Y column is vertical line at column index? In example1, Y appears at column 5 (0-index 4). So Y is central column. Left side columns 1-4 (indices 0-3) contain azure and maybe other colors. Right side columns 6-9 (indices 5-8) contain grey etc. Output width 4 corresponds to number of rows? Actually output rows same as input rows (5). Output columns correspond to number of left side columns? In example1 left side has 4 columns (indices 0-3). Output width 4 matches that. So each output column corresponds to a left column? But rule uses both left and right signals: maybe for each row, we take left column cell (azure?) and right column cell (grey?) at same row? But there are multiple left columns per row. Perhaps we need to compute XOR across each row for each left column? Let's examine row by row. Example1 Input row1: ". A . . Y . X X ." Indices:0 '.';1 'A';2 '.';3 '.';4 'Y';5 '.';6 'X';7 'X';8 '.' Left side columns 0-3: . A . . Right side columns 5-8: . X X . Output row1: ". . R ." Indices 0-3 output: . . R . So output column0 corresponds to left col0? left col0 '.' and right col? maybe right col? Let's map: For each left column i (0-3), pair with right column i? Right side columns maybe mirrored: column5 corresponds to left0, column6 to left1, column7 to left2, column8 to left3. That would align pairs: left0 '.' with right0 '.' (col5). XOR of signals? Both low (no signal) => output dark '.' (matches output col0 '.'). left1 'A' (signal high) with right1 'X' (signal high) => both high => output dark '.' (output col1 '.'), matches. left2 '.' with right2 'X' => low vs high => XOR => output red 'R' (output col2 'R'), matches. left3 '.' with right3 '.' => both low => '.' matches. Good! Thus rule: For each row, for each column left of Y (excluding Y), p ... [4467 chars truncated]
"A golden river separates the land of the living from the land of the dead. Souls glow red only where one bank is inhabited and the other is desolate."
120b: k=1
See: A vertical yellow river flows between two realms. Azure spirits inhabit the left bank; grey shades haunt the right. Black is empty ground.
Do: Ford the river and compare the banks: where one realm has a presence and the other is barren, a red soul manifests. Where both are populated or both are empty, nothing appears.
Grid: A half-width spirit map of red souls and black emptiness.
We need to infer rule. Input grid includes colors: ., A, Y, X etc. Output grid only contains . and R? In example output, only '.' and 'R'. So rule produces red where condition met, else black. Metaphor: vertical yellow river flows between two realms. Azure spirits left bank; grey shades right. Black empty ground. Ford the river and compare the banks: where one realm has a presence and the other is barren, a red soul manifests. Where both are populated or both empty, nothing appears. Interpretation: The input grid has a vertical column of Y (yellow) representing river. Left side of river (west) contains A (azure). Right side contains X (grey). Possibly also other colors? In example, left side has A and maybe other? Right side has X and maybe other. The rule: For each row, look at cells left of Y and right of Y? Or compare columns? "Ford the river and compare the banks": maybe we overlay left and right halves after mirroring across river? Where one side has a presence (non-black) and the other side is empty (black '.'), we place R at that position in output (maybe at the river column?). Output grid is half-width (as description). Output grid size appears to be number of rows same as input, but columns half? Let's examine example. Input example 1 dimensions: Let's count rows. Input lines: 1 ". A . . Y . X X ." 2 "A A . A Y X . . X" 3 "A A . . Y X . . X" 4 ". A . A Y . . X ." 5 ". . A . Y . X . X" So 5 rows, each 9 columns (including spaces). Output lines: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So output width = (input width -1)/2? Input width 9, minus 1 for river column =8, half =4. Yes. Thus we take left side columns (before Y) and right side columns (after Y). For each row, we compare each pair of cells symmetric across river: left column i (from left side) vs right column i (from right side). If exactly one of them is non-black (i.e., not '.'), then output cell is R; else '.'. Let's test with example. Row1 input: ". A . . Y . X X ." Indices: columns 1-4 left side: . A . . ; column5 Y; columns6-9 right side: . X X . Right side columns correspond to left side positions? Need to align: left side length 4, right side length 4. Right side order maybe left-to-right as is (i.e., column6 corresponds to left column1?). Probably compare left column1 with right column1 (col6), left2 with col7, etc. Row1 left: [., A, ., .] Right: [., X, X, .] Now apply rule: For each position: 1: left '.' (empty), right '.' (empty) => both empty => output '.' (matches output row1 col1 '.' yes) 2: left A (presence), right X (presence) => both populated => output '.' (output row1 col2 '.' yes) 3: left '.' empty, right X presence => one present => output R (output row1 col3 'R' yes) 4: left '.' empty, right '.' empty => '.' (output row1 col4 '.' yes). Works. Row2 input: "A A . A Y X . . X" Left: A A . A Right: X . . X Compare: 1: A vs X both present => '.' output row2 col1 '.'? Output row2 col1 '.' yes. 2: A ... [3423 chars truncated]
"A golden ribbon divides the ballroom floor. The choreographer marks red footprints only where one side has a dancer and the other side is empty."
120b: k=1
See: A vertical yellow ribbon splits the dance floor. Azure dancers hold poses on the left; grey dancers hold poses on the right. Black is empty floor.
Do: Pull the ribbon away and overlay the formations: wherever one side has a dancer and the other has open floor, stamp a red footprint. Where both have dancers or both are empty, the floor stays unmarked.
Grid: A half-width floor plan with red footprints and black unmarked tiles.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid includes colors: . (black), A (azure), Y (yellow), X (grey). Output grid includes . and R (red). The description: vertical yellow ribbon splits the dance floor. Azure dancers left, grey right. Black empty floor. Pull ribbon away and overlay formations: wherever one side has a dancer and the other has open floor, stamp a red footprint. Where both have dancers or both empty, floor stays unmarked. Interpretation: Input grid is half-width floor plan? Actually the input seems to be a full grid with left side (azure) and right side (grey) separated by a column of Y (yellow). The Y column is the ribbon. The left side of Y contains A (azure) and . (black). Right side contains X (grey) and . (black). The transformation: remove Y column, overlay left and right halves onto each other (like superimpose). For each position (excluding Y column), compare the left side cell and the right side cell (mirrored? Actually overlay: after pulling ribbon away, the left and right halves come together, aligning their columns adjacent? The Y column is removed, so the left side columns shift right to meet right side columns? Let's think. In example 1, Input grid dimensions: Let's count rows and columns. Input lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." That's 9 columns (including spaces). So columns: 1 '.';2 'A';3 '.';4 '.';5 'Y';6 '.';7 'X';8 'X';9 '.' Row2: "A A . A Y X . . X" (9 columns) Row3: "A A . . Y X . . X" Row4: ". A . A Y . . X ." Row5: ". . A . Y . X . X" So 5 rows, 9 columns. Y column is column5 (vertical). Left side columns 1-4, right side columns 6-9. Output grid is 5 rows, 4 columns (since half-width). Output rows: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" That's 4 columns. Thus rule: For each row, for each column index i from 1 to left width (4), compare left cell at column i and right cell at column (i + offset). The offset is maybe 5? Actually right side column index = i + (total columns - left width)?? Let's compute: total columns = 9, left width = 4, right width = 4 (since after Y column there are 4 columns). So right side column index = i + 5? Because Y column is column5, then right side starts at column6. So mapping: left col i (1-4) vs right col i+5 (6-9). Yes. Now rule: If exactly one of the two cells is a dancer (i.e., non-black) and the other is black (.), then output R. If both are dancers (both non-black) or both black, output . (black). Dancers are azure (A) on left side, grey (X) on right side. Possibly also other colors could appear but not in examples. Thus we need to apply to test input. Test Input grid (given after "Test Input:" in description). Let's list rows: Row1: ". A . . Y X . . ." Row2: ". A . A Y X X . X" Row3: "A A . A Y . . X X" Row4: "A A A A Y X . X X" Row5: ". . A A Y X . X ." Check column count: Let's count each row. Row1 tokens: . A . . Y X . . . => 9 columns (same as before). Row2: . A . A Y X X . X => 9. Row3: A A . A Y . . X X => 9. Row4: A A A A Y X . X X => ... [2711 chars truncated]
"A golden fault line splits two strata. Red magma surfaces only where one stratum has mineral deposits and the other is hollow rock."
120b: k=1
See: A vertical yellow fault line divides the cross-section. Azure mineral veins thread the left stratum; grey mineral veins thread the right. Black is hollow rock.
Do: Collapse the fault and compare layers: wherever one side has mineral and the other is hollow, red magma erupts through the gap. Where both have mineral or both are hollow, the rock stays dark.
Grid: A half-width geological cross-section of red magma and black rock.
We need to infer rule. Input grid seems rectangular? Example1 input lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9 columns. Next line 9, etc. Output grid is 5 rows? Actually output lines: ". . R ." (4 cols) etc 5 rows, 4 cols. So transformation reduces width? Probably collapse fault line: vertical yellow line divides left and right halves. In input, Y column is the fault line. Left side (columns left of Y) have azure A and maybe other colors; right side (columns right of Y) have grey X etc. Black '.' is hollow rock. Rule: compare left and right cells at same row? "Collapse the fault and compare layers: wherever one side has mineral and the other is hollow, red magma erupts through the gap. Where both have mineral or both are hollow, the rock stays dark." So we need to produce output grid representing the collapsed fault line? Output width maybe number of rows? Let's analyze example. Let's parse example1 input grid (I'll index rows). Write rows with columns: Row0: . A . . Y . X X . Row1: A A . A Y X . . X Row2: A A . . Y X . . X Row3: . A . A Y . . X . Row4: . . A . Y . X . X We have Y column at index? Count: columns 0-8. Y appears at column 4 (0-based). So left side columns 0-3, right side columns 5-8. Now output grid rows 5, columns 4. Likely each output cell corresponds to a row of input, and each column corresponds to a position after collapsing? Maybe each column corresponds to a pair of positions left vs right? Actually width 4 equals number of columns left side? left side width =4. So output width equals left side width. So for each row, we compare left cell at column i with right cell at column (i+? maybe mirrored?). Since after collapse, the left and right sides meet, aligning column i from left with column i from right (mirrored?). The right side columns are 5-8 (4 columns). Probably they align such that column 0 left aligns with column 0 right (i.e., column5). So we compare left[i] with right[i] (where right[i] is column 5+i). Then output cell is R if exactly one is mineral (i.e., not black '.'), and the other is black '.'; else '.' (dark). Mineral includes azure A, grey X? Also maybe other colors like B etc. In example, minerals are A and X (maybe also other colors). Let's test. Compute for each row. Row0 left cols 0-3: [., A, ., .] ; right cols 5-8: [., X, X, .] (col5 is '.'? Actually row0 col5 is '.' (since after Y there is '.' ), col6 X, col7 X, col8 .). Compare each pair: i0: left '.' vs right '.' => both hollow => output '.' (matches output row0 col0 = '.') i1: left 'A' (mineral) vs right 'X' (mineral) => both mineral => output '.' (output row0 col1 = '.') i2: left '.' vs right 'X' => one mineral one hollow => output 'R' (output row0 col2 = 'R') matches. i3: left '.' vs right '.' => both hollow => '.' (output row0 col3 = '.') Row0 output ". . R ." matches. Row1: left cols: [A, A, ., A]; right cols: [X, ., ., X] (col5 X, col6 ., col7 ., col8 X) Pairs: i0: A vs X => both mineral => '.' (output row1 c ... [3574 chars truncated]
"Two halves of a sandwich are compared by a picky eater who only wants bites where one side has filling and the other is bare bread."
120b: k=2
See: A yellow toothpick skewers through the center, holding apart a left slice spread with azure jam and a right slice dabbed with grey mustard, both on black bread.
Do: Remove the toothpick, press the halves together, and wherever one condiment meets bare bread on the other side, the bite turns red with heat. Where both have spread or both are bare, the bite stays cold and black.
Grid: A half-width grid of red hot bites and black cold bites.
We need to decode puzzle. Input grid includes colors: . (black), A (azure), Y (yellow), X (grey), maybe others. Output grid only uses . and R? In examples output only . and R. So transformation yields red hot bites (R) and black cold (.) based on rule described metaphorically. Interpretation: There is a "toothpick" (yellow) through center, separating left slice (azure jam) and right slice (grey mustard). So input grid has a vertical line of Y (yellow) maybe column? Let's examine Example1 input dimensions: lines? Let's parse. Example1 Input lines (9 columns?): ". A . . Y . X X ." "A A . A Y X . . X" "A A . . Y X . . X" ". A . A Y . . X ." ". . A . Y . X . X" So 5 rows, 9 columns. There's a column of Y at column 5 (0-index 4). Indeed each row has Y at same column. That's the toothpick. Left side (columns 1-4) contains A (azure) and . (black). Right side (columns 6-9) contains X (grey) and . (black). So left slice spread with azure jam (A) and right slice dabbed with grey mustard (X). The "bread" is black (.) background. Transformation: Remove toothpick (Y column disappears), press halves together (i.e., overlay left and right halves onto each other?). Where one condiment meets bare bread on the other side, the bite turns red (R). Where both have spread (both A and X?) or both are bare (both .) the bite stays black (.). So we need to combine left and right halves column-wise after removing Y column, aligning them such that left side columns are mirrored onto right side? Actually "press the halves together" suggests we bring left and right slices together, aligning them side by side, maybe overlapping the columns that were separated by the toothpick. The toothpick column is removed, so the left side columns shift right? Let's think. We have left slice width = columns left of Y (4 columns). Right slice width = columns right of Y (4 columns). When we press together, we overlay them such that column i from left aligns with column i from right (mirrored?). Probably we align them such that leftmost column of left slice aligns with leftmost column of right slice? But they were originally separated by Y column; after removal, they become adjacent: left slice columns 1-4, right slice columns 6-9 become columns 5-8? Actually after removing column 5, the grid becomes 8 columns: columns 1-4 then columns 6-9 shift left one. Then we "press halves together" maybe meaning we overlay them (like folding) so that each position now has two cells overlapping: one from left side and one from right side. The result is a half-width grid (as description says "A half-width grid of red hot bites and black cold bites.") So output grid width is half of original width (excluding Y). Indeed Example1 output has 4 columns (since original width 9, minus 1 Y =8, half =4). Output rows same as input rows (5). So we combine left and right halves column-wise: for each row, for each position j (0..3), we take left cell at column j and right cell at column (original right side column ... [6195 chars truncated]
"Two orchestral sections are separated by a conductor's baton — only the notes played by one section alone ring out as solos."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vertical yellow baton divides the score: azure notes written on the left staff, grey notes on the right, all against silent black rests.
Do: Lower the baton and listen for dissonance: wherever one section plays a note against the other's silence, a red solo rings out. Where both play or both rest, silence remains.
Grid: The resulting score is half as wide, with red solos and black silences.
"Two teams line up on opposite sides of a net, and the referee flags only the positions where one side has a player standing alone without a mirror opponent."
120b: k=1
See: A yellow net stretches vertically down the court. Azure players stand in various positions on the left; grey players stand on the right. Empty positions are black.
Do: Drop the net and mark every position where exactly one team has a player — paint that spot red. Where both have players facing off, or both positions are empty, leave it unmarked.
Grid: A half-court diagram with red flags and black empty spots.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5 rows? Let's examine Example 1. Input lines (looks like 5 rows, each maybe 9 columns). Let's write them. Row1: ". A . . Y . X X ." Row2: "A A . A Y X . . X" Row3: "A A . . Y X . . X" Row4: ". A . A Y . . X ." Row5: ". . A . Y . X . X" Output lines (5 rows, each maybe 4 columns?). Output: Row1: ". . R ." Row2: ". R . ." Row3: ". R . R" Row4: ". R R R" Row5: ". R R R" So output dimensions are smaller: 4 columns vs 9 input columns. So transformation includes some reduction. Interpret metaphor: "yellow net stretches vertically down the court. Azure players stand in various positions on the left; grey players stand on the right. Empty positions are black." So Y = net (vertical line). A = azure players left side. X = grey players right side. . = empty (black). Need to "drop the net and mark every position where exactly one team has a player — paint that spot red. Where both have players facing off, or both positions are empty, leave it unmarked." Interpretation: The net is vertical line of Y's. We drop net (i.e., collapse columns onto each other?) Possibly we overlay left side and right side across the net, comparing positions opposite each other across the net. For each row, we have left side columns (left of net) and right side columns (right of net). When we drop net, we align left and right columns onto each other (like folding). Then for each pair, if exactly one side has a player (A or X) then output red at that position; else (both have player or both empty) output empty (black). Output grid width equals number of rows? Actually output columns maybe equal to number of rows? Let's compute. In example, net Y appears in each row at column? Let's locate Y column index (0-based). Row1: columns: 0 '.';1 'A';2 '.';3 '.';4 'Y';5 '.';6 'X';7 'X';8 '.' So Y at col4. Row2: "A A . A Y X . . X": Y at col4 again. Row3: Y at col4. Row4: Y at col4. Row5: Y at col4. So net is vertical line at column 4 (5th column). So left side columns 0-3 (4 columns). Right side columns 5-8 (4 columns). Output grid is 4 columns, matching left side width (or right side). So after dropping net, we compare each left column with corresponding right column (mirrored?) Possibly we align left column i with right column i (same offset from net). For each row, we compare left cell (col i) and right cell (col 5+i). If exactly one is a player (A or X) then output R at that column i; else '.'. Let's test with example. Create table rows. Row1 left cols 0-3: [., A, ., .] ; right cols 5-8: [., X, X, .] (col5 '.'; col6 X; col7 X; col8 .) Now compare each position: i0: left '.' (empty), right '.' (empty) => both empty => output '.' (matches output row1 col0 '.') i1: left 'A' (player), right 'X' (player) => both have players => output '.' (but output row1 col1 is '.'? Actually output row1 is ". . R .": col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 'R' col3 '.' . So col1 '.' matches. i2: left '.' empty, right 'X' player => exactly one p ... [5605 chars truncated]
"A cold front and a warm front collide along a stationary boundary — only where one system pushes into calm air does a red storm cell form."
120b: k=1
See: A yellow stationary front line runs vertically through the atmosphere. Azure high-pressure zones sit to the left; grey low-pressure zones churn to the right. Black is calm air.
Do: Collapse the front and check each region: where one pressure system meets calm air on the other side, a red storm erupts. Where both systems clash directly or both are calm, the sky stays dark.
Grid: A half-width weather map of red storm cells and black clear skies.
We need to infer rule. Input grid seems larger than output: Input appears 5 rows? Example1 Input: lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9 columns. Next rows also 9 columns. Output: 5 rows, 4 columns. So transformation reduces width? Possibly collapse front: The description: yellow stationary front line runs vertically through atmosphere. Azure left, grey right, black calm. Collapse front and check each region: where one pressure system meets calm air on the other side, a red storm erupts. Where both systems clash directly or both are calm, sky stays dark. Interpretation: Input grid contains vertical line of Y (yellow) representing front. To left of Y are A (azure) and maybe . (black). To right are X (grey) and maybe . (black). Need to collapse front: maybe compress each row into a single cell per region? Output shows only red and black? Actually output uses '.' and 'R' only. So output grid is reduced to only red (storm) and black (calm). So rule: For each row, we examine left side region (cells left of Y) and right side region (cells right of Y). Determine if exactly one side has any non-black (i.e., pressure system) while other side is all black? Then output red at that row column? But output width 4 columns, not 1 per row. Let's examine example. Let's parse Example1 input grid (5 rows, 9 cols). Write rows with indices. Row0: . A . . Y . X X . Row1: A A . A Y X . . X Row2: A A . . Y X . . X Row3: . A . A Y . . X . Row4: . . A . Y . X . X Now output 5 rows, 4 cols: Row0: . . R . Row1: . R . . Row2: . R . R Row3: . R R R Row4: . R R R So output width 4. How derived? Maybe after collapsing front, we get a half-width map: left side (west) and right side (east) each become a column? Actually half-width: original width 9, front at column 4 (0-index). So left side columns 0-3 (4 columns), right side columns 5-8 (4 columns). Output width 4 corresponds to each side? Maybe we overlay left and right after collapsing front: For each row, we compare each pair of cells symmetric around front: left column i (0-3) vs right column (5+ i). Then apply rule: if one is pressure (A or X) and the other is black (.) then output red at that position; else black. Let's test: For row0, left columns 0-3: [., A, ., .]; right columns 5-8: [., X, X, .] (since col5 is ., col6 X, col7 X, col8 .). Pairwise: i0: left '.' (black), right '.' (black) => both calm => output '.' (black). Output row0 col0 is '.' matches. i1: left 'A' (pressure), right 'X' (pressure) => both systems clash => output '.' (dark). Output row0 col1 is '.' matches. i2: left '.' , right 'X' => one side pressure, other calm => red. Output row0 col2 is 'R' matches. i3: left '.' , right '.' => both calm => '.' matches output row0 col3 '.'. Great! Row1: left cols 0-3: [A, A, ., A]; right cols 5-8: [X, ., ., X] (col5 X, col6 ., col7 ., col8 X). Pairwise: i0: A vs X => both pressure => '.' output row1 col0 '.' matches. i1: A vs '.' => pressure vs calm => R. Output row1 c ... [4104 chars truncated]
"A load-bearing wall divides two mirror rooms. The inspector marks in red every spot where one room has a pillar and the other has open space — structural imbalance."
120b: k=2
See: A yellow load-bearing wall runs floor to ceiling. Azure pillars support the left room; grey pillars support the right. Black is open floor.
Do: Remove the wall on the blueprint and flag imbalances: where one room has a pillar and the other has open floor, mark it red. Where both have pillars or both have open space, leave it unmarked.
Grid: A half-width blueprint with red imbalance flags on a black background.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grids have colors: . black, A azure, Y yellow, X grey, maybe others. Output grids have only . and R? In examples output only . and R. So transformation extracts something. Metaphor: "yellow load-bearing wall runs floor to ceiling. Azure pillars support the left room; grey pillars support the right. Black is open floor. What to do: Remove the wall on the blueprint and flag imbalances: where one room has a pillar and the other has open floor, mark it red. Where both have pillars or both have open space, leave it unmarked. Grid details: A half-width blueprint with red imbalance flags on a black background." Interpretation: Input grid is half-width blueprint? Actually input appears rectangular with columns maybe 9? Example1 input 9 columns? Let's count: ". A . . Y . X X ." that's 9. Output example1 has 4 columns? Output lines: ". . R ." that's 4 columns. So output is half width (maybe removing the wall column). The wall is yellow column Y that runs floor to ceiling (vertical line). So we need to split the grid into left and right rooms separated by the Y column. Remove the Y column (wall) and produce a new grid of half width (maybe left side only?) Actually output width is 4 while input width 9, so removed the Y column and also maybe removed the right side? Wait half-width blueprint: maybe we overlay left and right rooms onto each other? The output is a grid where each cell corresponds to a pair of cells: left side cell and right side cell at same row? The rule: For each row, compare left side (left of wall) and right side (right of wall). If one side has a pillar (azure A on left side, grey X on right side) and the other side has open floor (black .), then mark red R. If both have pillars or both open, leave unmarked (i.e., .). So output cell corresponds to each row? But output has multiple columns, not just one per row. So maybe we compare column-wise: For each row, we compare each column left of wall with the corresponding column right of wall (mirrored?) Actually the wall runs floor to ceiling, so it's a vertical line of Y. The left room and right room each have same width? Input width maybe 2*W+1 (wall column). Output width is W (half). So we need to compare each column left of wall with the column right of wall (mirrored across wall). For each row and each offset from wall, we look at left cell (left side) and right cell (right side). If they differ in terms of pillar vs floor, we output R else . . That matches output dimensions: width = number of columns left of wall (or right). Example1: Input width 9, so left side columns = 4 (since wall column is at position 5). Indeed columns: indices 1-4 left, 5 is Y, 6-9 right (4 columns). Output width 4 matches. Now need to define pillar vs floor: Pillar colors: left side azure A is pillar; right side grey X is pillar. Open floor is black . . So we need to check each pair (left cell, right cell). Cases: - left is A (pillar) and right is . (open) => imbalanc ... [3925 chars truncated]
"Two armies face each other across a golden fortification. The battlefield scars appear only where one army's soldiers stand unopposed."
120b: k=1
See: A yellow fortress wall divides the field. Azure infantry hold positions on the left; grey infantry hold the right. Black is no man's land.
Do: Breach the wall and survey the field: where one army stands unopposed by the other, the ground turns red with conflict. Where forces are matched or both absent, the ground stays dark.
Grid: A half-width battlefield of red scars and black earth.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is half-width? Let's examine example. Example 1 Input grid dimensions? Let's count rows: given lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." "A A . A Y X . . X" "A A . . Y X . . X" ". A . A Y . . X ." ". . A . Y . X . X" Each row length? Count tokens separated by space: first row: . A . . Y . X X . => 9 columns. 5 rows. Output grid: lines: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" Output rows 5, columns 4. So transformation reduces width roughly half? The description: "A half-width battlefield of red scars and black earth." So output is half width of input (maybe floor(width/2)). Input width 9 -> output width 4 (since half of 9 rounded down?). 9/2 = 4.5 floor 4. Yes. Now rule: Input has colors: A azure left side, X grey right side, Y yellow wall dividing? Y appears column 5 in each row (since 9 columns). Indeed Y at column5 all rows. So Y is vertical wall dividing left and right halves. Left side (columns 1-4) have azure A and maybe . black. Right side (columns 6-9) have X grey and . black. The description: "where one army stands unopposed by the other, the ground turns red with conflict. Where forces are matched or both absent, the ground stays dark." Interpretation: For each row, we compare left side and right side positions? Maybe we compare each column pair across the wall: column i on left vs column i on right (mirrored?) Since wall at column5, left side columns 1-4 correspond to right side columns 6-9 (same offset). For each row, we look at each pair (col1 vs col6, col2 vs col7, col3 vs col8, col4 vs col9). Determine output cell (maybe red if exactly one side has army (A or X) and the other is empty (.)). If both have army or both empty, output black (.)? Let's test with example. Let's map row1 input: columns: 1 . (black) 2 A (azure) 3 . 4 . 5 Y wall 6 . (black) 7 X (grey) 8 X (grey) 9 . (black) Pairs: c1 vs c6: . vs . => both empty => output? In output row1 col1 is '.' (black). Good. c2 vs c7: A vs X => both armies present (different colors) => "forces are matched" => output black? Output row1 col2 is '.' (black). Yes. c3 vs c8: . vs X => one side army (right) unopposed => output red? Output row1 col3 is 'R'. Yes. c4 vs c9: . vs . => both empty => output '.'? Output row1 col4 is '.' . Yes. Row1 matches rule. Row2 input: ". A . A Y X . . X" Columns:1 . ;2 A;3 .;4 A;5 Y;6 X;7 .;8 .;9 X Pairs: 1 vs6: . vs X => one army => R? Output row2 col1 is '.'? Wait output row2 col1 is '.' according to given output: ". R . .". Actually row2 output first column '.' . Hmm our expectation R but got '.' So maybe rule is different: maybe we consider left side army vs right side army of same type? Or maybe we consider presence of azure vs grey: if left has azure and right empty => red? Let's test. Row2 pair1: left '.' (none), right X (grey) => unopposed grey => maybe red? But output '.' suggests not red. Let's examine other pairs. Pair2: col2 A vs col7 . => left azure unop ... [5770 chars truncated]
"A golden curtain parts to reveal two casts rehearsing the same play — the director spotlights only the actors who have no counterpart on the other side."
120b: k=1
See: A vertical yellow curtain divides the stage. Azure actors rehearse on stage left; grey actors on stage right. Black is empty stage.
Do: Raise the curtain and compare blocking: wherever one side has an actor and the other has empty stage, a red spotlight illuminates that position. Where both sides have actors or both are empty, the light stays off.
Grid: A half-width stage map of red spotlights and dark positions.
We need to infer rule. From description: vertical yellow curtain divides stage. Azure actors left side, grey actors right side. Black empty stage. Output red spots where one side has actor and other empty. So input grid includes colors: A azure, X grey, Y yellow curtain, . black empty. Need to compare left and right of the Y column? Probably Y column is vertical line dividing. For each row, we look at cells left of Y and right of Y? But grid may have multiple Y columns? In examples, there is a column of Y's? Let's examine Example1 input (size?). Provided as lines with spaces? Actually they are strings with spaces? Input lines: ". A . . Y . X X ." "A A . A Y X . . X" "A A . . Y X . . X" ". A . A Y . . X ." ". . A . Y . X . X" Let's count columns: first line: . A . . Y . X X . => 9 columns. Y appears at column5 (index 4). All rows have Y at column5. So vertical curtain at column5. Left side columns 1-4 are azure (A) or . (black). Right side columns 6-9 are X (grey) or . (black). Output grid is smaller: 5 rows, 4 columns? Output lines: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" That's 4 columns. So output corresponds to positions where left side vs right side compare? Probably each row yields a column per left side? Actually output width 4 equals number of columns left of curtain (or right?). Let's think: For each row, we compare each left cell with corresponding right cell? But there are 4 left cells and 4 right cells (since total 9 columns, minus 1 Y =8, split 4 left, 4 right). So we can pair left column i with right column i (mirrored across curtain). For each pair, if one is actor (A or X) and other is empty (.) then output red at that position (maybe on left side?). Output grid shows red positions where mismatch. Let's test row1: Input row1 left side columns1-4: . A . . ; right side columns6-9: . X X . . Wait there are 4 right cells: columns6 '.'? Actually column6 is '.' (since after Y there is '.'), column7 X, column8 X, column9 '.' . So right side: . X X . . Wait that's 5? Let's list: columns:1 .,2 A,3 .,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 X,8 X,9 . . That's 9 columns, right side columns6-9 are . X X . . Wait that's 4 columns: col6 ., col7 X, col8 X, col9 . . Actually there are only 4 columns after Y, but we have 5? Let's recount: maybe there is extra '.' at end? The string ". A . . Y . X X ." has 9 tokens: 1 .,2 A,3 .,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 X,8 X,9 . . So right side columns6-9 are ., X, X, . . That's 4 cells: ., X, X, . . Good. Now compare left vs right per position i (1-4). Pair1: left col1 '.' vs right col6 '.' => both empty => no red. Pair2: left col2 'A' vs right col7 'X' => both actors (different colors) => no red. Pair3: left col3 '.' vs right col8 'X' => left empty, right actor => red. Pair4: left col4 '.' vs right col9 '.' => both empty => no red. So we expect red at position 3 (index 3) in output row1. Output row1: ". . R ." matches red at third column. Good. Row2 input: "A A . A Y X . . X". Columns:1 A,2 A,3 .,4 A,5 Y,6 X ... [4065 chars truncated]
"A golden trellis separates two garden beds. The gardener plants red flowers only in spots where one bed blooms and the other lies fallow."
120b: k=1
See: A yellow trellis runs vertically through the garden. Azure flowers grow on the left bed; grey flowers grow on the right. Black is bare soil.
Do: Remove the trellis and cross-pollinate: wherever one bed has a bloom and the other has bare soil, a red hybrid sprouts. Where both bloom or both are barren, nothing new grows.
Grid: A half-width garden bed of red hybrids and black soil.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid with colors. Metaphor: yellow trellis runs vertically through garden. Azure flowers left bed; grey flowers right. Black is bare soil. Remove trellis and cross-pollinate: wherever one bed has a bloom and the other has bare soil, a red hybrid sprouts. Where both bloom or both barren, nothing new grows. Grid details: A half-width garden bed of red hybrids and black soil. Interpretation: Input grid contains vertical column of Y (yellow) representing trellis. Left side of Y are azure (A) and maybe other colors? Right side are grey (X). Black (.) is soil. The transformation: remove Y column, then for each row, compare left cell (left of Y) and right cell (right of Y). If one is a bloom (i.e., non-black? maybe A or X?) and the other is black (.), then output a red (R) at that position? Output grid is half-width garden bed of red hybrids and black soil. So output grid likely consists of a single column? Actually example: Input grid size? Let's examine Example 1. Input lines (I'll count columns). Row1: ". A . . Y . X X ." That's 9 columns. Row2: "A A . A Y X . . X" 9. Row3: "A A . . Y X . . X" 9. Row4: ". A . A Y . . X ." 9. Row5: ". . A . Y . X . X" 9. So Y column is at column5 (index 5). Left side columns 1-4, right side columns 6-9. Output grid: lines: ". . R ." ". R . ." ". R . R" ". R R R" ". R R R" That's 4 columns each row. So output width is left side width? Actually left side width is 4 columns. Output also 4 columns. So output corresponds to left side? Or maybe combine left and right? Let's compute rule: For each row, we consider each pair of cells left and right at same row? But there are 4 left cells and 4 right cells (since right side also 4 columns). Perhaps we compare each left cell with corresponding right cell (mirrored?) and produce output cell at that column based on condition: if exactly one of the pair is a bloom (non-black) and the other is black, then output R; else output . (black). That would produce 4 columns. Let's test with row1. Input row1 left side columns1-4: . A . . ; right side columns6-9: . X X . (since column6 is ., 7 X,8 X,9 .). Let's list pairs per column index i (1..4): i1: left '.' (black), right '.' (black) => both barren => output '.' (matches output row1 col1 '.' yes) i2: left 'A' (bloom), right 'X' (bloom) => both bloom => output '.' (output row1 col2 '.' yes) i3: left '.' (black), right 'X' (bloom) => one bloom one barren => output 'R' (output row1 col3 'R' yes) i4: left '.' (black), right '.' (black) => output '.' (output row1 col4 '.' yes) Matches. Row2: left cols: A A . A ; right: X . . X Pairs: 1: A vs X => both bloom => '.' (output row2 col1 '.' yes) 2: A vs . => one bloom one barren => R (output row2 col2 'R' yes) 3: . vs . => '.' (output col3 '.' yes) 4: A vs X => both bloom => '.' (output col4 '.' yes) matches. Row3: left: A A . . ; right: X . . X Pairs: 1: A vs X => both bloom => '.' (output row3 col1 '.' y ... [3264 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains several small 3×3 shapes scattered on a black background. Each shape is a distinct pattern of colored cells within a 3×3 bounding box, with the remaining cells black. Multiple colors may be present (e.g., red, green, azure, blue, yellow, magenta), and some shape patterns appear more than once as exact duplicates — same color and same spatial arrangement of colored cells within their 3×3 bounding box.
Do: 1. Scan the input grid and identify every distinct 3×3 shape by extracting each connected or nearby cluster of non-black cells and reading its 3×3 bounding box pattern. 2. Group these shapes by their exact pattern (same color and same cell arrangement within the 3×3 box). 3. Count how many identical copies exist for each distinct shape pattern. 4. Select the shape pattern that has the highest number of identical copies in the grid. 5. Output that 3×3 pattern as the result.
Grid: The input is a rectangular grid (typically 14×14) with a black (.) background. The output is always a 3×3 grid showing the extracted shape pattern on a black background. Each shape occupies exactly a 3×3 bounding box within the input grid.
"A talent show where the most popular act wins the encore."
120b: k=1
See: A dark stage is scattered with small troupes of performers, each wearing matching costumes of a single color — blue dancers, red acrobats, yellow jugglers, azure mimes. Each troupe strikes a unique pose within its own small spotlight. Some acts are one-of-a-kind, but others have sent identical understudy groups who mirror the original's pose and costume perfectly, scattered elsewhere across the stage.
Do: The audience votes by recognition: whichever act has sent the most identical understudy copies of itself onto the stage is clearly the crowd favorite. That winning troupe — the one whose exact pose and costume appears more times than any other — earns the encore. Pull them into the spotlight alone and let the rest of the stage go dark.
Grid: The stage is a wide dark floor where each troupe occupies a small spotlight just large enough for a few performers. The encore spotlight shrinks to show only the winning troupe's formation against the darkness, exactly as they stood during the show.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small 3x3? In example output is 3x3. Likely we need to find the most frequent pattern (shape) of a color cluster (connected component) that appears multiple times identical (same shape and color). Then output that shape isolated on minimal bounding box, with other cells empty (.)? In example, output shows Y . . etc. So winning troupe is Y (yellow). Let's examine example input to see clusters of Y. We need to parse example input (14x15?). Let's map coordinates. But maybe easier: Identify distinct shapes of each color. Count identical copies (same shape orientation). The most copies wins. Then output that shape in its original orientation, placed in top-left? In output they placed shape as appears (maybe bounding box trimmed). For Y shape, output grid 3x3 with Y pattern. Let's examine Y positions in example input. Write rows (0-index). I'll transcribe quickly. Row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." Row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." Row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." We need to find Y clusters. Let's locate each Y coordinate. Row1 col2 (0-index). Row2 col3,4. Row3 col2, col11. Row4 col12,13. Row5 col10. Row8 col9. Row9 col10,11. Row10 col2, col9. Row11 col3,4. Row12 col2. That's many Y cells, many separate clusters. We need to find identical shapes. Likely there are multiple copies of a small shape of Y of size maybe 3 cells? Let's examine clusters. Cluster A: Row1 col2 alone? Check adjacency orthogonal? Usually connectivity maybe 4-direction. Row1 col2 adjacent to any other Y? Row2 col3 is diagonal, not orthogonal. So isolated single Y. Cluster B: Row2 col3 and col4 adjacent horizontally (size 2 line). Also maybe adjacent to row1 col2 diagonal not count. So shape of two horizontal Y. Cluster C: Row3 col2 isolated? Row3 col11 isolated. Cluster D: Row4 col12,13 adjacent horizontally (size2). Row5 col10 isolated. Row8 col9 isolated. Row9 col10,11 adjacent horizontally (size2). Row10 col2 isolated, col9 isolated. Row11 col3,4 adjacent horizontally (size2). Row12 col2 isolated. Thus we have many size1 and size2 horizontal pairs. Which shape appears most? Horizontal pair appears many times: at (row2 col3-4), (row4 col12-13), (row9 col10-11), (row11 col3-4). That's 4 occurrences. Single Y appears many times: count singles: row1 col2, row3 col2, row3 col11, row5 col10, row8 col9, row10 col2, row10 col9, row12 col2 = 8 singles. So singles more frequent. But output shows a shape of Y with pattern: Output: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a 3x3 shape with Y at (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like an L ... [10588 chars truncated]
"In a petri dish teeming with microcolonies, each species leaves a unique footprint. The dominant strain—the one that has replicated most successfully—is isolated for study."
120b: fail
See: A culture medium dotted with small colonial formations, each a distinct species identified by its pigment and morphology.
Do: Identify which microcolony pattern has proliferated the most copies of itself across the dish. Isolate and extract that dominant strain.
Grid: The petri dish is a dark field with colored colonial clusters. The extracted specimen is presented alone on a clean slide.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 14x14? Actually examples show 14 rows, each 14 columns. Output grids are 3x3. So rule extracts a 3x3 pattern representing the most frequent "microcolony pattern" maybe the shape of a particular color cluster? Let's examine Example1. We need to find which color appears most in some pattern? Let's analyze. Example1 input contains colors B, Y, R. Output is a 3x3 grid with Y and . (black). Output pattern: Y . . . Y Y Y . . So shape of Y? Let's see positions of Y in input maybe form that shape repeated many times? Let's map coordinates of Y in input. Hard manually but maybe pattern of Y forms a plus shape? The output pattern shows Y at (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like a small shape. Maybe rule: find the most common 3x3 subgrid (ignoring other colors) and output that subgrid with only the dominant color and '.' elsewhere? Let's test. In Example2, colors A and R. Output 3x3: A . A . A . A . A That's a pattern of A in corners and center, like a X shape? Actually positions: (0,0) A, (0,2) A, (1,1) A, (2,0) A, (2,2) A. That's a diagonal cross. In input, there are many A's arranged maybe in that pattern repeated? Let's see input: there are many A's scattered. Possibly the most common 3x3 pattern of A's is that shape. Example3: colors A and M. Output: . A . A A A . A . That's a plus shape (cross). Input has A's forming plus shapes? Let's examine: there is a cluster of A's at rows 2-4 columns 3-5 maybe forming plus. Indeed rows 2-4 (0-index) show A's: row2 col3 = A, row3 col2-4 = A A A, row4 col3 = A. That's exactly the plus shape. Also there are M's elsewhere. So rule: Identify the most frequent 3x3 pattern of a single color (maybe the color that forms a connected component of size 5?) Actually plus shape of A appears once maybe. But maybe there are multiple such patterns of A? Let's count: In example3, there is also a plus shape of A at rows 8-10 columns 9-11? Let's see rows 8-10: row8 col9 = A, row9 col8-10 = A A A, row10 col9 = A. Yes there is another plus shape of A later. So there are at least two occurrences of that plus shape. So the rule could be: find the color that appears in the most 3x3 patterns (maybe overlapping) and output that pattern. In example1, Y pattern maybe appears many times. Let's see Y positions: there are Y's scattered. The output pattern Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . . That's like a shape of Y's maybe appears multiple times. Let's test: In example1, there is a cluster of Y's at rows 1-3 columns 2-4? Let's examine rows (0-index). Row0: Y at col2? Actually row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. So cluster at rows1-3 cols2-4 forms shape: (1,2) Y; (2,3) Y; (2,4) Y; (3,2) Y. That's exactly the output pattern (rotated?). Output pattern Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . corresponds to coordinates: (0,0) Y, (1,1) Y, (1,2) Y, (2,0) Y. That' ... [9318 chars truncated]
"An astronomer surveys a patch of sky crowded with small nebulae. Each nebula has a distinctive emission pattern, but one particular shape keeps appearing—a cosmic signature repeated by some unseen process."
120b: k=3
See: A dark sky field with small colored nebular formations, each a unique emission shape, some appearing as exact duplicates.
Do: Identify the nebular emission pattern that occurs most frequently across the field. Catalog that pattern as the dominant cosmic signature.
Grid: The sky field is a dark void with colored nebular shapes. The catalog entry isolates a single small emission pattern.
We need to infer rule: From examples, output is a small pattern (3x3) representing the most frequent shape? Let's analyze. Example1 input: large grid 14x14. Output 3x3 pattern of Y and . (black). Output: Y . . . Y Y Y . . So pattern of Y's shape appears most frequently in input? Let's locate Y clusters in input. Look at input grid: many Y scattered. Need to find shape of size maybe 3x3? The output is a 3x3 pattern with Y's at positions (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like a shape of 4 Y's. Check if that shape appears multiple times in input as a subgrid? Let's examine input coordinates: Represent grid rows 0-13, columns 0-13. We need to find occurrences of that pattern (Y's at those relative positions) maybe with other colors ignored? The pattern includes Y and . (black) meaning only Y positions matter, other cells must be not Y? Possibly pattern of Y's shape that appears most frequently. Let's search manually: Look at input rows where Y appear. Row1 (index0): ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. Row2 (1): ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. Row3 (2): ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. Row4 (3): ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. Row5 (4): ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at col12,13. Row6 (5): ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at col10. Row7 (6): ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." none Y. Row8 (7): ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." none Y. Row9 (8): ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col9. Row10 (9): ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at col10,11. Row11 (10): ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col2,9. Row12 (11): ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at col3,4. Row13 (12): ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at col2. Row14 (13): ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." none. Now we need to find a 3x3 pattern of Y's that appears most often. The output pattern Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . corresponds to Y positions: (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). Let's see if such arrangement appears somewhere. Check around row1-3 etc. For each Y cluster maybe shape of 4 Y's. Look at rows 1-3 (indices 1-3) columns 2-4 maybe? Let's extract subgrid rows1-3 cols2-4 (3x3). Rows: row1 (index1): col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . row2 (2): col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y row3 (3): col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . That matches exactly! So pattern appears at top-left region rows1-3 cols2-4. Good. Now are there other occurrences? Let's search other Y clusters. Rows9-11 (indices9-11) columns9-11 maybe? Row9 (index9): col9 ., col10 Y, col11 Y => . Y Y (but need Y . . at top row). Not match. Rows10-12 (10-12) columns2-4? Row10 (index10): col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . ; Row11 (11): col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y ; Row12 (12): col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . . That's same pattern! Indeed rows10-12 cols2-4 produce same pattern. So there are at least two occurrences. Thus rule: find the most frequent 3x3 pattern of a particular color (maybe any color) that appears at least twice, output that pattern with that color and '.' elsewhere. Example2: Input ... [8263 chars truncated]
"A cartographer charts an archipelago where each tiny island has a unique silhouette. The island shape that appears most often across the chain reveals the geological forces that built these waters."
120b: k=3
See: A dark ocean surface with small colored island formations scattered about, each with a distinct shape, some shapes repeated.
Do: Find the island silhouette that recurs most frequently across the archipelago. Engrave that shape onto the nautical chart's legend.
Grid: The ocean is a dark expanse with colored island shapes. The chart legend displays a single small island silhouette.
We need to infer rule: From examples, output is a small pattern (3x3) representing the most frequent shape (island silhouette) from input. Input grids are 14x14. The output is 3x3 pattern of colors (non-black?) Actually output shows only colors of the most frequent shape, with other cells '.'? Let's examine Example1. Input contains many colored cells: B, Y, R. Need to find shape that recurs most frequently. Output is: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a 3x3 pattern with Y's forming a shape. So the most frequent shape is a Y-shaped island? Let's see input: Look for clusters of Y maybe shape of 3x3 with Y at positions (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). Actually output pattern coordinates: row0 col0 Y, row0 col1 ., row0 col2 .; row1 col0 ., col1 Y, col2 Y; row2 col0 Y, col1 ., col2 . . That's like a rotated L shape? Let's map: positions with Y: (0,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's shape of 4 cells. Now find such shape in input: Look at input grid (14x14). Let's locate Y clusters. Row0: column? Input row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at col12,13. Row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at col11. Row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." none. Row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." none. Row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col9. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at col10,11. Row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col2 and col9. Row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at col3,4. Row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at col2. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." none. We need to find shape of 4 Y cells in that pattern. Let's see if there is a 3x3 region with Y at those positions. For example rows1-3 columns2-4 maybe? Let's extract rows1-3, cols2-4: Rows indices 1,2,3; cols2,3,4. Row1 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . Row2 col2 . , col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y Row3 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . That matches output exactly! So the shape appears at rows1-3, cols2-4. So the most frequent shape is that Y pattern. Are there other occurrences? Possibly multiple same shape elsewhere? Let's check other Y clusters: rows10-12 maybe? rows10-12 cols2-4: Row10 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . Row11 col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y Row12 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . matches again! So there are at least two occurrences. So shape appears multiple times. So rule: find the most common 3x3 pattern (ignoring '.' maybe) that appears in the grid, and output that pattern. Example2: Input contains A and R. Output is: A . A . A . A . A That's a 3x3 pattern with A at corners and center, others '.'. Find occurrences: Look at input rows1-3 cols2-4 maybe? Let's map. Input rows (0-index). Row1: ". . A . A . . . . . . . . ." So at col2 A, col4 A. Row2: ". . . A . . . . . . A . A ." A at col3, col10, col12. Row3: ". . A . A . . . . . . A . ." A at col2, col4, col11. So region rows1- ... [8876 chars truncated]
"A technician examines a circuit board under magnification. Many small component footprints are soldered on, but the component placed most frequently is clearly the workhorse of the design."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark circuit board with small colored component footprints in various configurations scattered across the surface.
Do: Identify which component footprint appears in the greatest number of identical placements on the board. Extract that footprint as the reference part.
Grid: The PCB is a dark substrate with colored component pads. The datasheet shows a single small component footprint.
"In a hall of enchanted mirrors, each mirror holds a different trapped spirit's sigil. The sigil that appears in the most mirrors is the true name of the curse—the one the sorcerer keeps casting."
120b: fail
See: A dark hall with small glowing sigils in various colors and shapes scattered across the mirrors, some sigils identical.
Do: Find the sigil that has been inscribed in the most mirrors. That repeated sigil is the true spell—extract it from its frame.
Grid: The hall is a dark void with colored sigil patterns. The spell scroll reveals a single small sigil.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 14x14? Yes each example 14x14. Output is 3x3 grid. The rule: find the most frequent pattern (sigil) that appears multiple times in input? The description: find sigil that has been inscribed in the most mirrors (i.e., appears most frequently). Extract it from its frame. So we need to locate the most common shape (color pattern) that appears multiple times across the grid, then output that shape (maybe 3x3) extracted from its bounding box? In examples, output is 3x3 pattern of the most frequent color? Let's analyze. Example1: Input contains many colors: B blue, Y yellow, R red. Output is: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a 3x3 pattern of Y and . (black). So the most frequent sigil is a Y pattern shape? Let's see occurrences of that pattern in input. Look for a 3x3 region that matches that pattern. The pattern: Row0: Y . . Row1: . Y Y Row2: Y . . Coordinates relative: positions with Y at (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like a shape of Y's forming a small diagonal cross? Let's search in input mentally: In example1 grid, there are many Y scattered. Perhaps there is a 3x3 block containing exactly those Y positions. Let's scan: At rows 2-4? Row indices starting 0. Input lines: I'll index rows 0-13. Row0: . . . . . . . B . B . . . . Row1: . . Y . . . . B B B . . . . Row2: . . . Y Y . . . B . . . . . Row3: . . Y . . . . . . . . Y . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y Row5: . . . . . . R . R . . Y . . Row6: . B . B . . . R . . . . . . Row7: . B B B . . R . R . . . . . Row8: . . B . . . . . . Y . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . Y Y . . Row10: . . Y . . . . . . Y . . . . Row11: . . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B Row12: . . Y . . . . . . . . B B B Row13: . . . . . . . . . . . . B . We need to find a 3x3 region where Y's are at those positions. Let's check around row1-3 columns? For example rows1-3 cols0-2: rows1 col0 '.'; row1 col1 '.'; row1 col2 'Y' (that's Y at (0,2) not match). Not. Maybe pattern appears multiple times; the most frequent shape is that pattern. Could be shape of Y's forming a "L" shape? Let's compute frequency of each color? Y appears many times. But output includes only Y and . So maybe rule: find the color that appears most frequently overall, then output a 3x3 pattern that is the minimal bounding box of that color's cluster? In example1, which color appears most? Count: Y appears many, B also many, R some. Let's approximate: Y appears maybe 15 times, B maybe 12, R maybe 8. So Y is most frequent. Then output is a 3x3 pattern of Y's shape? The pattern maybe the shape of Y's that appears most often as a 3x3 subgrid? But why 3x3? Maybe the most frequent color forms a shape of size 3x3 (connected component) and we output that component's shape trimmed to bounding box. Let's examine Y positions: list coordinates (row,col): (1,2) (2,3),(2,4) (3,2),(3,11) (4,12),(4,13) (5,10) (8,9) (9,10),(9,11) (10,2),(10,9) (11,3),(11,4) (12,2) That's many scattered, not forming a 3x3 cluster. However there is a ... [9256 chars truncated]
"A choreographer reviews footage of an open rehearsal where dancers formed many small figures. The formation that appeared most often—the one the troupe kept gravitating toward—becomes the signature move of the finale."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with small clusters of colored dancers frozen in various formations, some formations appearing multiple times.
Do: Determine which dancer formation was struck most frequently across the rehearsal. Notate that formation as the finale's centerpiece.
Grid: The rehearsal space is dark with colored dancer positions. The notation card shows a single small formation.
"A geologist cracks open a dark matrix of rock to find it studded with tiny crystal inclusions. Each crystal has a unique lattice habit, but one habit dominates the sample—the mineral that crystallized under the prevailing conditions."
120b: k=3
See: A dark rock matrix with small colored crystal formations embedded throughout, each with a distinct habit, some habits repeated.
Do: Identify the crystal habit that occurs most frequently in the sample. Extract that mineral specimen for classification.
Grid: The rock matrix is a dark ground mass with colored crystal shapes. The specimen mount displays a single small crystal habit.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 14x14? Yes each example 14x14. Output is 3x3 grid showing pattern of most frequent "crystal habit". Likely we need to find the most common shape of colored cells (connected component) and output its shape normalized to bounding box? Let's examine Example1. We need to identify which color appears most frequently? In example1 colors: B, Y, R. Count? Let's approximate. Y appears many times maybe most frequent. Output is a 3x3 pattern with Y and . (black). Output pattern: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a shape of Y cells. So likely the most frequent color is Y, and we extract its shape (connected component) that occurs most frequently? But there are many Y cells scattered. Need to find a particular habit (shape) that repeats most often among Y components. Then output that shape. Let's analyze example1: Look at input grid coordinates (14x14). Need to find clusters of Y (adjacent orthogonal? maybe 8-direction?). Let's map quickly. I'll index rows 0-13, cols 0-13. Row0: B at col7 and col9? Actually row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." So B at (0,7) and (0,9). Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at (1,2). B at (1,7,8,9). Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at (2,3),(2,4). B at (2,8). Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at (3,2) and (3,11). Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at (4,12),(4,13). Row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at (5,11). R at (5,6),(5,8). Row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." B at (6,1),(6,3). R at (6,7). Row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." B at (7,1,2,3). R at (7,6,8). Row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." B at (8,2). Y at (8,9). Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at (9,10),(9,11). Row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at (10,2),(10,9). Row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at (11,3),(11,4). B at (11,11),(11,13). Row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at (12,2). B at (12,11,12,13). Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." B at (13,11). Now we need to find Y clusters. Let's see adjacency orthogonal (4-dir). Identify components. Component A: Y at (1,2) adjacent to (2,2?) none. (2,3) is Y but diagonal? (2,3) is at (2,3) which is diagonal to (1,2) (down-right). If only orthogonal, not connected. So maybe connectivity includes diagonal (8-dir). Let's test: The output shape is 3x3 with pattern Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . . That shape includes three Y's in a L shape? Actually pattern coordinates: (0,0) Y, (0,1) ., (0,2) .; (1,0) ., (1,1) Y, (1,2) Y; (2,0) Y, (2,1) ., (2,2) . . That's shape of three Y's forming a small L shape (like a corner). So maybe the most common Y cluster shape is that L of three cells. Let's see if such shape appears in input. Look at Y positions: maybe cluster of three Y's connected orthogonally/diagonally forming that shape. Check cluster around (1,2),(2,3),(2,4)? That's Y at (1,2), (2,3), (2,4). Are they connected? (1,2) adjacent diagonally to (2,3). (2,3) adjacent orthogonal to (2,4). So shape coordinates relative: (0,0) (1,1) (1,2) maybe? That's no ... [8444 chars truncated]
"A baker surveys the morning's pastry trays. Many varieties were attempted, but only the recipe that was repeated most often—the crowd favorite—makes it onto the display case."
120b: k=1
See: A kitchen counter scattered with small pastries of different shapes and flavors, some recipes duplicated across the spread.
Do: Count which pastry design appears most frequently among all the offerings. Place that one signature pastry on the serving plate.
Grid: The counter is a dark workspace with colorful pastry shapes. The display plate is a small, clean surface showing the winning design.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output small 3x3? In example output is 3x3 grid with Y and . . So rule: find most frequent color among non-black? In description: count which pastry design appears most frequently among all offerings. Place that one signature pastry on the serving plate. So output grid likely shows pattern of that most frequent shape? In example input, we need to see which color appears most. Let's count approximate: colors present: B, Y, R. Need most frequent. Let's approximate counts: Hard but maybe Y is most frequent? Output contains Y and . only. So most frequent color is Y, and output is a 3x3 pattern of Y's maybe representing shape of Y cluster? Output:
Y . .
. Y Y
Y . .
That's a shape of Y's maybe the most common shape? Let's examine input to see pattern of Y's arrangement? Look at input grid coordinates where Y appears. Let's map roughly: rows (0-index). Row0: positions 8? Actually row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. Row4: "... Y Y at end? row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at col12,13. Row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at col10. Row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." none Y. Row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." none Y. Row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col9. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at col10,11. Row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col2,9. Row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at col3,4. Row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at col2. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." none Y.
So many Y's. Count B's? B appears many as well. But likely Y is most frequent. Output is a 3x3 pattern of Y's maybe representing the most common 3x3 shape of Y? Let's see if there is a 3x3 block of Y's in input that matches output pattern. Look for pattern:
Y . .
. Y Y
Y . .
That's like a shape of Y's in a 3x3. Does such arrangement exist? Let's check region around rows1-3 columns2-4 maybe. Row1 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 .? Row1 col3 is '.' (since row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . .") yes col3 '.' col4 '.' . Row2 col2 '.'? row2 col2 '.' (". . . Y Y ...") col3 Y, col4 Y. Row3 col2 Y, col3 '.' col4 '.'? row3 col2 Y, col3 '.' col4 '.' . So pattern:
Row1: Y . .
Row2: . Y Y
Row3: Y . .
Matches! Indeed rows1-3 cols2-4 produce that pattern. So rule: find the most frequent color, then locate the smallest bounding box? Actually find a 3x3 pattern of that color that appears? Maybe we need to output the pattern of that color's most common 3x3 arrangement? In this case the pattern appears exactly once? Could be that we need to extract the 3x3 region that contains the most occurrences of that color? Or maybe we need to output the shape of that color's cluster that is most frequent (i.e., the most common shape among clusters of that color). The cluster shape we extracted is exactly the pattern of Y's in that region. So output is that shape.
Thus for test input
... [4773 chars truncated]
"A composer listens back to a sprawling improvisation, picking out the melodic fragment that recurs most insistently—the motif the piece can't stop humming to itself."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A score scattered with short melodic phrases in different timbres, some phrases echoing each other exactly across the composition.
Do: Find the motif that appears in the most identical repetitions throughout the piece. Transcribe that motif alone as the theme.
Grid: The full score is a silent dark page with colored note clusters. The extracted theme is a small, isolated phrase.
"At a tournament's end, the jerseys are laid out on the field. The team with the most players wearing identical uniforms claims the championship banner."
120b: k=1
See: A playing field with small clusters of colored jerseys scattered about, each cluster representing a different team's formation.
Do: Determine which jersey pattern appears in the greatest number of identical copies across the field. Award that team's crest the trophy.
Grid: The field is a dark expanse with colored jersey formations. The trophy display shows a single small crest pattern.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output is small 3x3 pattern. The description: find which jersey pattern appears in greatest number of identical copies across the field. So we need to find the most frequent subgrid pattern? Output shows that pattern. In example1, output is: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a 3x3 pattern of Y and . (black). Need to see where this pattern appears in input multiple times. Let's examine input quickly: It's 14x15? Actually lines show 14 rows, each with 15 columns. Need to locate occurrences of that 3x3 pattern. Pattern: Row0: Y . . Row1: . Y Y Row2: Y . . We need to find identical copies of this pattern in the input. Likely there are multiple occurrences of that arrangement of Y's among black cells. The most frequent pattern among all possible 3x3 subgrids? Could be. Thus rule: slide a 3x3 window over input, count each distinct pattern (ignoring other colors? maybe only consider Y and .?). But pattern includes only Y and .; other colors maybe not present in those windows. So we need to find the most frequent 3x3 pattern overall (including any colors). Then output that pattern. Check if any other colors appear in that pattern? No. So maybe the most frequent 3x3 pattern is that one. Thus for test input, we need to find the most frequent 3x3 subgrid pattern and output it. We need to compute frequencies. Input size 14x14? Let's count rows: given 14 rows each with 14 columns? Actually each line shows 14 entries? Let's count first row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14. So grid 14x14. We need to consider all possible 3x3 windows: (14-2)*(14-2)=12*12=144 windows. We need to find which pattern repeats most. We can attempt manually maybe pattern of R's? Let's map grid. I'll index rows 0-13, cols 0-13. I'll write grid as matrix. Row0: all . (14) Row1: all . Row2: ". . . G . G . . . . R . . ." Let's write columns: 0 . 1 . 2 . 3 G 4 . 5 G 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 R 11 . 12 . 13 . Row3: ". . . . G G . . . R R R . ." col0 . 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 G 5 G 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 R 10 R 11 R 12 . 13 . Row4: ". . . G . G . . . R R . . ." col3 G,5 G,9 R,10 R. Row5: all . Row6: all . Row7: ". . . . . . . A . . . . . ." col7 A? Wait count: positions: 0-6 ., 7 A, rest . Row8: "R . . . . . A . A . . . . ." Let's parse: col0 R, col1 ., col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 A, col7 ., col8 A, col9 ., rest . Row9: "R R R . . . . A . . . . . ." col0 R,1 R,2 R,7 A. Row10: "R R . . . . . . . . . . . ." col0 R,1 R. Row11: ". . . . . R . . . G . G . ." col5 R, col9 G, col11 G. Row12: ". . . . R R R . . . G G . ." col4 R,5 R,6 R,9 G,10 G. Row13: ". . . . R R . . . G . G . ." col4 R,5 R,9 G,11 G. Now we need to find most frequent 3x3 pattern. Likely pattern of all . (empty) maybe most common. But does output include only .? In example, they didn't output all . pattern even though many windows are all . (since many black area). So maybe they consider patterns that contain at least one non-black? Or maybe they consider only patterns that consist ... [6330 chars truncated]
"A meteorologist studies a satellite image peppered with storm cells. Each cell has a unique pressure signature, but the pattern that keeps spawning identical copies is the season's defining weather system."
120b: k=2
See: A dark atmospheric map with small colored pressure formations scattered across the region, some formations identical twins of each other.
Do: Identify the pressure signature that has generated the most identical copies across the map. Report that signature as the dominant system.
Grid: The satellite image is a dark canvas with colored weather cells. The forecast card isolates the dominant pressure pattern.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input large grid, output small 3x3 pattern. Likely find the most frequent shape (pattern) of a particular color that appears multiple times (identical copies). Then output that pattern (maybe bounding box) with colors? In example1 output is 3x3 with Y and . only. Let's analyze example1 input to see Y pattern occurrences. We need to locate clusters of Y maybe? Let's map coordinates quickly? Hard but we can think: The output pattern: Y . . . Y Y Y . . That's a shape of Y cells in a 3x3. So likely the most frequent 3x3 pattern of Y? Let's see if there are multiple identical Y clusters of that shape in input. Look at input example1: many Y scattered. Could there be three Y's forming that shape? Let's try to locate: At rows (0-index) maybe row0 col? Input lines: row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at col12,13. row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at col10. row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." none. row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." none. row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col9. row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at col10,11. row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col2,9. row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at col3,4. row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at col2. row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." none. Now look for pattern of Y's shape: maybe a 3x3 block with Y at positions (0,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's shape like a small L with extra. Let's see if any 3x3 region matches that. For example region rows1-3 cols2-4? Let's extract: rows1-3, cols2-4 (indices). Row1 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . ; Row2 col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y ; Row3 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . . That matches output exactly! So there is a 3x3 region with that pattern at rows1-3, cols2-4. Are there other identical copies elsewhere? Possibly yes. Let's search quickly: Another region rows10-12, cols2-4? Row10 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . ; Row11 col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y => . Y Y ; Row12 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . => Y . . . That's same! Indeed rows10-12, cols2-4 matches. So there are at least two copies. Maybe that's the most frequent pattern among colors. So rule: find the most common 3x3 subgrid pattern (maybe of any color) that appears at least twice, output that pattern. Check example2: Output pattern is: A . A . A . A . A That's a cross shape of A's at corners and center. Let's see input example2: many A's. Need to find 3x3 region with that pattern appears multiple times. Look at rows1-3, cols2-4? Row1: ". . A . A . . . . . . . . ." columns? Let's index: row1 col2 A, col3 ., col4 A => A . A ; row2 col2 ., col3 A, col4 . => . A . ; row3 col2 A, col3 ., col4 A => A . A . That matches output. Another copy maybe rows8-10? Let's see rows8-10 (0-index). Row8: ". . . A . A . . . R . R . ." columns ... [7238 chars truncated]
"An urban planner flies over a city at night, noting the small lit structures below. One building design has been copied across more neighborhoods than any other—that's the city's vernacular architecture."
120b: k=2
See: A dark aerial view with small illuminated building footprints in various colors and layouts scattered across the landscape.
Do: Find the building footprint design that has been replicated the most times across the city. Present that blueprint as the vernacular template.
Grid: The cityscape is a dark ground plane with colored building footprints. The blueprint is a small isolated floor plan.
We need to infer rule: From examples, output is a small pattern (3x3) that is the most frequently occurring subgrid pattern (building footprint) in input? Let's analyze. Example1 input is 14x14 grid with many colors. Output is 3x3 pattern: Y . . . Y Y Y . . We need to see where this pattern appears in input. Look for that 3x3 arrangement of Y and . (black). Let's map '.' as black. In input, Y appears at various positions. Need to find 3x3 region that matches output exactly. Let's scan mentally: maybe there is a 3x3 cluster of Y's shaped like that. Output pattern: positions (0,0)=Y, (0,1)=., (0,2)=.; (1,0)=., (1,1)=Y, (1,2)=Y; (2,0)=Y, (2,1)=., (2,2)=. So shape like a rotated L? Actually Y's at (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like a small shape. Find occurrences: In input, look at rows with Y. Row0: positions? Row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." no Y. Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Y at col2. Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." Y at col3,4. Row3: ". . Y . . . . . . . . Y . ." Y at col2 and col11. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y" Y at col12,13. Row5: ". . . . . . R . R . . Y . ." Y at col11. Row6: ". B . B . . . R . . . . . ." none. Row7: ". B B B . . R . R . . . . ." none. Row8: ". . B . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col9. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . Y Y . ." Y at col10,11. Row10: ". . Y . . . . . . Y . . . ." Y at col2,9. Row11: ". . . Y Y . . . . . . B . B" Y at col3,4. Row12: ". . Y . . . . . . . . B B B" Y at col2. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . B ." none. Now need to find 3x3 region matching pattern. Let's check around row1-3 columns2-4 maybe. Take rows1-3, cols2-4 (indices). Row1 col2=Y, col3='.', col4='.'? Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." So col2=Y, col3='.', col4='.' (since row1 col3 is '.'), good. Row2 col2='.', col3=Y, col4=Y (since row2 has Y at col3,4). Row3 col2=Y, col3='.', col4='.' (row3 col2=Y, col3='.', col4='.' ), matches pattern! So that 3x3 region appears at rows1-3, cols2-4. Are there other occurrences? Possibly multiple. The rule: find the most frequent 3x3 pattern? Let's see if any other pattern repeats more. But output is that pattern. Example2: Input 14x14 with A and R. Output 3x3: A . A . A . A . A That's a pattern of A's at corners and center, like a plus missing edges. Let's locate in input. Look for 3x3 region with that arrangement. Input rows with A: many. Let's examine rows1-3, cols2-4 maybe. Row1: ". . A . A . . . . . . . . ." So at col2=A, col3='.', col4=A. Row2: ". . . A . . . . . . A . A ." So col2='.', col3='A', col4='.'? Wait col3 is A? Actually row2 col3 = A (since pattern . . . A ...). So row2 col2='.', col3='A', col4='.' . Row3: ". . A . A . . . . . . A . ." So col2=A, col3='.', col4=A. That matches pattern A . A / . A . / A . A? Wait row2 center should be A at (1,1) of 3x3. In our region rows1-3, cols2-4, the center is row2 col3 which is A, yes. So pattern matches. So again that region appears. Thus rule: find the most common 3x3 subgrid (maybe of non-black colors) and output that subgrid. In ... [5891 chars truncated]
"A general reviews the battlefield from a hilltop. Many small units have taken positions, each in a different formation. The formation deployed most often reveals the enemy's favored tactic."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield scattered with small colored unit formations, each a distinct tactical arrangement, some formations repeated.
Do: Identify which tactical formation has been deployed in the greatest number of identical instances. Extract that formation as the enemy's signature maneuver.
Grid: The battlefield is dark terrain with colored troop markers. The intelligence briefing shows a single small formation diagram.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid with many colors. Output is small 3x3 grid: Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . . So output appears to be the most frequent pattern (formation) extracted. Need to find which subgrid pattern appears most often in input. Likely we look for a particular shape of colored cells (maybe a 3x3 pattern) that repeats. In example, output is a 3x3 pattern with Y's at certain positions. Let's analyze example 1 input to see occurrences. Input grid size 14x14? Actually lines show 14 columns. Output is 3x3. So maybe we need to find the most common 3x3 subgrid (any colors) and output that subgrid. In example, the most common 3x3 subgrid is the pattern with Y's as shown. Let's test: In input, there are many Y's scattered. The pattern Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . corresponds to Y at (0,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's like a shape of Y's forming a small L? Let's see if that appears multiple times. We need to count all 3x3 windows in input and find which one repeats most. Could be that pattern appears 2+ times, others appear less. Let's quickly scan input for that pattern. Represent coordinates: top-left of window at (r,c). Need Y at (r,c), (r+1,c+1), (r+1,c+2), (r+2,c). Others any color? In output they are '.' (black) meaning empty. So pattern includes only Y's at those positions, and other cells are black (.) in output. But in input, other cells may be other colors, not necessarily black. So maybe we consider only positions of a particular color (e.g., Y) and ignore others? The output shows only Y and .; maybe we extract the shape of the most common color arrangement ignoring other colors (treat non-target as .). So we find the most common arrangement of Y's within a 3x3 window (positions where Y appears). That arrangement is Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . . So we output that arrangement with Y's and . elsewhere. Thus rule: Find the color that appears most frequently in the grid? Not exactly; Y appears many times but pattern of Y's may be common. Let's test: In input, there are many Y's scattered. The pattern of Y's maybe appears multiple times. Let's locate one: Look at rows 0-2? Row0: ". . . . . . . B . B . . . ." Row1: ". . Y . . . . B B B . . . ." Row2: ". . . Y Y . . . B . . . . ." So consider window rows0-2 cols0-2: positions: (0,0) ., (0,1)., (0,2). ; (1,0)., (1,1)., (1,2) Y ; (2,0)., (2,1)., (2,2). . Not match. Maybe window rows1-3 cols2-4? Let's compute: rows1-3, cols2-4: Row1 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . ; Row2 col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y ; Row3 col2 Y, col3 ., col4 . . That gives pattern: Y . . / . Y Y / Y . . matches! Indeed row1 col2 = Y (top-left), row2 col3 = Y (center), row2 col4 = Y (right), row3 col2 = Y (bottom-left). Yes matches output pattern. So that window exists. Now need to see if this pattern appears elsewhere multiple times, maybe most frequent. Thus rule: Find the most common 3x3 pattern of a particular color (maybe any color) where we treat other colors as '.' (ignore). Output that pattern with that color. But n ... [5771 chars truncated]
"After a night of one-act plays, the festival director reviews the lineup. The play that was staged the most times—by popular demand—earns a permanent spot in the repertoire."
120b: k=2
See: A dark stage scattered with small tableaux vivants in different colors and arrangements, each a frozen scene from a different play.
Do: Count which tableau appears in the most identical stagings across the festival. Preserve that scene as the signature production.
Grid: The festival grounds are a dark space with colored scenic arrangements. The repertoire card shows a single preserved tableau.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger (14x14). Output is 3x3. The rule: find the most frequent 3x3 pattern? Or find the most common subgrid shape? Let's analyze Example1. We need to see which tableau appears most identical across the festival. Likely we need to find the most frequent 3x3 pattern of colored cells (non-black?) within the input, and output that pattern. In Example1 output is: Y . . . Y Y Y . . So a 3x3 pattern with Y's and dots. We need to see if that pattern appears multiple times in input. Let's examine input quickly (hard). But maybe the most frequent 3x3 subgrid of any colors? Could be that we count occurrences of each distinct 3x3 subgrid (including all colors) and pick the one with highest count. Output that subgrid. Check Example2: Output pattern: A . A . A . A . A So a cross pattern of A's at corners and center? Actually corners and center? pattern: positions (0,0) A, (0,2) A, (1,1) A, (2,0) A, (2,2) A. That's like a plus shape rotated? It's like a X shape. We need to see if that pattern appears most frequently in Example2 input. Let's examine Example2 input: many A's and R's. The pattern of A's maybe appears many times. We need to verify quickly: The input grid 14x14. Look for 3x3 windows where A's at those positions. Could be many. Alternative rule: maybe we need to find the most common color that forms a specific shape (like a plus) and output that shape with that color, others as dot. In Example1 output uses Y only. So maybe Y appears in that shape most frequently. In Example2 output uses A only. Thus rule: Identify which color appears most frequently in a specific 3x3 pattern (maybe a "diagonal cross" shape). Then output that pattern with that color, others as dot. But need to define shape: In Example1 pattern: Y at (0,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's not symmetric. Let's map coordinates: Row0: Y . . Row1: . Y Y Row2: Y . . Positions: (0,0), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's like a shape of 4 cells. In Example2 pattern: A at (0,0), (0,2), (1,1), (2,0), (2,2). That's 5 cells forming X shape. So shapes differ. So maybe the pattern is the most frequent 3x3 subgrid overall, not constrained shape. Thus we need to find the most common 3x3 subgrid (including all colors). In Example1, the most common 3x3 subgrid is that Y pattern. In Example2, the most common is the A X shape. Thus we need to compute for test input. We need to scan all possible 3x3 windows (positions 0-11 rows, 0-11 cols) in 14x14 grid, count each distinct pattern (including colors). Then find the one with highest count. Output that 3x3 pattern. We must do manually? Could be limited patterns. Let's list colors present: G, R, A. Also maybe others? In test input we have G, R, A. No Y etc. We need to find most frequent 3x3 subgrid. We can try to look for simple patterns like a single color block etc. Let's write the grid with coordinates. I'll index rows 0-13, cols 0-13. Row0: all . (14 dots) Row1: all . Row2: ". . . G . ... [10950 chars truncated]
"A gardener walks through a wildflower meadow where many species bloom in small clusters. The flower that has self-seeded most prolifically—spreading the most identical blooms—is harvested for the seed catalog."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark soil bed dotted with small clusters of colored blossoms, each cluster a unique floral pattern, some species appearing multiple times.
Do: Determine which floral pattern has produced the most identical blooms across the meadow. Pick that specimen for the catalog illustration.
Grid: The meadow is dark earth with colored blossom patterns. The catalog page shows a single small floral specimen.
See: The input grid has a black background containing one or more rectangular concentric two-color patterns. Each pattern consists of an outer frame of one color (the 'border color') surrounding a filled rectangular interior of a second color (the 'core color'). The core region can be any rectangular dimensions (1×1, 1×2, 2×2, etc.). The border is always exactly one cell thick. Multiple patterns may appear on the same grid at different positions and do not overlap.
Do: For each pattern in the input, perform the following steps: 1. Identify the border color (B) and core color (C), and note the dimensions of the core region (height h, width w). 2. Color-swap the original pattern to create a new center: replace every B cell with C, and every C cell with B. This produces a C-frame surrounding a B-filled interior, positioned exactly where the original pattern was. 3. Extend the border outward by adding rectangular bands of B cells in all four cardinal directions. Each band has thickness equal to the core dimensions along the perpendicular axis: - Top and bottom bands: extend h rows outward, spanning the full width of the original pattern. - Left and right bands: extend w columns outward, spanning the full height of the original pattern. 4. The extensions do not include diagonal corners — only the cardinal-direction projections of the original pattern's footprint are filled. 5. All cells not covered by any pattern or its extensions remain black.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input. The background is black (.). Patterns and their extensions must fit within the grid boundaries. Each pattern is processed independently; if multiple patterns exist, they do not interact or overlap.
"A living cell divides, turning itself inside-out and stretching its membrane outward like a starfish reaching its arms."
120b: k=2
See: On a dark ocean floor, you find small living cells — each one a nucleus of one color wrapped snugly in a membrane of another. They sit quietly, compact and self-contained, like seeds waiting to germinate.
Do: Each cell undergoes mitosis in place. First, the cell inverts — the membrane sinks inward to become the new nucleus, while the old nucleus material rises to coat the surface, as if the organism turned itself inside-out. Then, energized by this transformation, the creature reaches outward in the four cardinal directions, projecting thick pseudopods of its old membrane color. Each pseudopod's thickness mirrors the proportions of the original nucleus — a wide nucleus sends out wide arms, a tall nucleus sends out tall arms. The creature stretches only along the compass lines, never diagonally — like a starfish that grew exactly four arms aligned to the grid.
Grid: The ocean floor stays dark wherever no creature has claimed territory. Each organism's body and outstretched arms must remain within the boundaries of the world. Multiple creatures, if present, grow independently without touching one another.
We need to understand rule. From description: each "cell" is a nucleus of one color wrapped in membrane of another. In examples, input shows a shape: a 3x3 block? Let's examine Example1 input: there is a 4x4? Actually coordinates: rows 3-6 columns 3-6? Let's map. Input example1: rows index 0-9. At row3 col3-6: R R R R (a horizontal line). Row4 col3 R, col4 O, col5 O, col6 R. Row5 same. Row6 col3-6 R R R R. So shape is a 4x4 square with outer border R and interior O (2x2). So outer color = membrane (R), inner color = nucleus (O). That's a "cell". Output shows transformation: The outer border becomes interior? Let's see output: rows 1-8? Output row1 (index1) has R R R R at col3-6 (same as input row3). Row2 same. Row3: at col2-7: R R O O O O R R (a larger shape). Row4: R R O R R O R R. Row5 same. Row6: R R O O O O R R. Row7: row7 col3-6 R R R R. Row8 same. So the original 4x4 cell expanded outward with arms of membrane color (R) extending outward in four directions, thickness equal to original nucleus dimensions (which is 2x2). Indeed original nucleus O is 2x2. So arms thickness = 2 cells wide/tall. The membrane color R becomes new nucleus (fills original interior?) Wait after transformation, the "membrane sinks inward to become new nucleus, while old nucleus rises to coat surface". So original membrane color (R) becomes interior (new nucleus) and original nucleus color (O) becomes outer border (membrane). In output, the central area (original 4x4) now has R interior? Let's see output rows3-6 columns3-6: they are R R R R? Actually row3 (index3) col3-6 are O O O O? Wait row3 is ". R R O O O O R R .". At col3 (0-index) maybe? Let's compute: row3 (index3) has pattern: . R R O O O O R R . .? Actually output row3: ". R R O O O O R R .". So columns: 0 '.'; 1 'R';2 'R';3 'O';4 'O';5 'O';6 'O';7 'R';8 'R';9 '.' . So the original 4x4 region (cols3-6 rows3-6) now contains O's (the original nucleus) as interior? Wait original membrane was R, now interior is O? Actually row3 col3-6 are O O O O (original nucleus). So yes original nucleus O becomes interior (new nucleus). The original membrane R becomes outer border (including arms). So rule: swap colors: membrane becomes outer, nucleus becomes inner. Arms: extend outward from the new outer border (original membrane color) in four cardinal directions, thickness equal to dimensions of original nucleus (height and width). In example1, original nucleus is 2x2, so arms are 2 cells thick. Indeed arms extend 2 cells outward from each side of the original square, forming a larger plus shape. Specifically, the output shape is a larger square of size (original size + 2*thickness)?? Let's compute: original outer size = 4 (including membrane). Thickness = 2. Output outer size = 8? Actually outermost R border extends 2 cells beyond original border on each side, making total size 8? Let's see: original outer border at rows3-6, cols3-6. Output outermost R border appears at rows1-8, cols1-8? Row1 (index1) has R at cols3-6 on ... [11155 chars truncated]
"A nucleus undergoes chromatic inversion while the cytoplasm pushes pseudopods outward along the body axes, each limb as thick as the nucleus it fled."
120b: k=1
See: A membrane-bound organelle resting in empty cytosol — a skin of one pigment cradling a core of another.
Do: The organelle inverts its chemistry — skin becomes marrow, marrow becomes skin — then extrudes projections of the old skin color outward along the cardinal axes, each projection matching the core's girth in the perpendicular direction.
Grid: Same dimensions. The void remains void. Only the organelle and its new projections carry color.
We need to infer rule. From example 1: Input shows a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 10x10. There's a shape: a square of R border with O interior 2x2? Actually input lines: Row3 (0-index?) Let's index rows 0-9. Rows: 0 all . 1 all . 2 all . 3: . . . R R R R . . . 4: . . . R O O R . . . 5: . . . R O O R . . . 6: . . . R R R R . . . 7-9 all . So shape: a 4x4 block from rows3-6 cols3-6. Outer border R, interior O 2x2. Output: same dimensions. Let's view output rows: 0 all . 1: . . . R R R R . . . 2: . . . R R R R . . . 3: . R R O O O O R R . 4: . R R O R R O R R . 5: . R R O R R O R R . 6: . R R O O O O R R . 7: . . . R R R R . . . 8: . . . R R R R . . . 9 all . So shape expanded outward with projections of old skin color (R) outward along cardinal axes, each projection matching core's girth in perpendicular direction. Interpretation: Original organelle: skin = R, core = O. Invert: skin becomes marrow (core) and core becomes skin. So after inversion, the central area becomes R and outer border becomes O? But output shows many R still. Let's think: In output, the original O interior (2x2) becomes a plus shape? Actually output interior region (rows4-5 cols4-5) are R (core). The original O region (2x2) becomes O in a larger shape? Let's examine output: At rows3-6 cols3-6 we have a pattern: a 4x4 block of O? Actually rows3-6 cols3-6: Row3 col3-6: O O O O (all O) Row4 col3-6: O R R O Row5 col3-6: O R R O Row6 col3-6: O O O O So that's like original border now O, interior now R (2x2). So inversion done. Now projections: "extrudes projections of the old skin color outward along the cardinal axes, each projection matching the core's girth in the perpendicular direction." Old skin color = R. Projections outward along up, down, left, right from the organelle. Each projection width equals core's girth (size) in perpendicular direction. Core after inversion is R (size 2x2). So projections are R bars extending outward from each side, width equal to core's size perpendicular: So vertical projections up/down have width equal to core's width horizontally (2). So we see in output rows1-2 and rows7-8 have R bars of width 4? Let's see: rows1-2 have R from col3-6 (4 columns). That's width 4, not 2. Wait maybe projection includes both old skin and new core? Let's examine: The original organelle after inversion occupies rows3-6 cols3-6 (size 4). The projections are added beyond that: Upwards rows1-2 have R from col3-6 (same width as organelle). Downwards rows7-8 same. Leftwards columns1-2 rows3-6 have R? Actually output rows3-6 columns1-2 are R (two columns). Rightwards columns7-8 rows3-6 are R. So indeed projections of R extend outward by 2 cells (the core's size?) Actually original organelle size 4x4. Core size after inversion is 2x2. Projections extend outward by core size? For up/down, they added 2 rows of R (rows1-2 and rows7-8). For left/right, added 2 columns of R (col1-2 and col7-8). So projection thickness equals core size (2). And length ... [7336 chars truncated]
"A binary star system undergoes spectral inversion — the shell trades luminosity with the core — then tidal streams of the old shell's light stretch along the galactic cardinal axes, each stream as broad as the core measured crosswise."
120b: fail
See: Dark space with a single nebular object: a shell of one spectral color surrounding a core of another.
Do: Invert the spectra — core becomes shell, shell becomes core. The old shell color then extends as tidal streams in four cardinal directions, each stream's width equal to the core's perpendicular dimension.
Grid: Space remains dark. Only the object and its tidal streams carry light.
We need to infer rule. Input example: a 10x10 grid with a red shell (R) surrounding orange core (O). Actually shape: a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input shows a square of R border with O interior 2x2? Let's visualize: rows 4-7 columns 4-7 (0-index?). Input rows 3-6 (0-index) have R border. Row3: columns3-6 R R R R. Row4: col3 R, col4 O, col5 O, col6 R. Row5 same. Row6: row6 col3-6 R R R R. So it's a 4x4 square with outer ring R, inner 2x2 O. Output: The core becomes shell and shell becomes core, plus streams extending in four cardinal directions with width equal to core's perpendicular dimension. Let's see output: The new core (now R?) Actually after swapping, the previous shell color R becomes interior, and previous core O becomes outer? Let's examine output grid. Output rows: row1 (index1) has R R R R at columns3-6 (same as original shell but moved up?). Actually output row1 (index1) is ". . . R R R R . . .". That's row index1 (second row). Original shell was at rows3-6. Now appears at rows1-2 and rows7-8 as well? Let's list output rows: Row0 all . Row1: . . . R R R R . . . Row2: . . . R R R R . . . Row3: . R R O O O O R R . Row4: . R R O R R O R R . Row5: . R R O R R O R R . Row6: . R R O O O O R R . Row7: . . . R R R R . . . Row8: . . . R R R R . . . Row9 all . So shape now is larger: a plus-shaped streams? The original core O (2x2) now becomes a cross shape of O? Actually O appears in rows3-6 columns4-7? Let's see: Row3: columns3? row3: ". R R O O O O R R ." So O occupies columns4-7 (4 O's). Row4: ". R R O R R O R R ." O at col4 and col7. Row5 similar. Row6: ". R R O O O O R R ." O at col4-7. So O forms a hollow rectangle? Actually O forms a shape like original R shell but with a hole? Wait. The new R appears as a larger square 6x6? Let's see R positions: rows1-2 columns3-6 (full). rows3-6 columns3-? there are R at col3 and col8? Row3: R at col2? Actually row3: ". R R O O O O R R ." So R at col1? Let's index: columns0-9. Row3: col0 '.'; col1 'R'; col2 'R'; col3 'O'; col4 'O'; col5 'O'; col6 'O'; col7 'R'; col8 'R'; col9 '.'. So R forms vertical bars at col1-2 and col7-8 for rows3-6. Also top rows1-2 have R block columns3-6. Bottom rows7-8 same. Thus the transformation: original core (O) becomes a cross-shaped stream extending outward in four directions, width equal to core's perpendicular dimension (core is 2x2, so width = 2). The streams are of the old shell color (R). The new core (now R) becomes the inner core? Actually the old shell becomes core (filled) maybe? In output, the central area (where original core was) now has O as a plus shape? Wait central area rows3-6 columns3-8 includes O and R. The O region is like a plus shape of width 2? Actually O occupies a 4x4 region with a hole? Let's think: The original shell (R) becomes the new core (filled) of size same as original shell? In output, the central 4x4 area (rows3-6, cols3-8) has O in a plus shape and R in corners? Not exactly. Maybe rule: swap colors: core becomes shell ... [12225 chars truncated]
"A ship's hull is careened and repainted inside-out — the waterline paint moves inboard, the cabin color wraps the hull — then the old hull paint leaks along the four cardinal currents, each slick as wide as the cabin was athwartships."
120b: fail
See: Open water with a single vessel footprint: an outer hull color surrounding an inner cabin color.
Do: Swap hull and cabin colors. The original hull color then flows outward in four cardinal wakes, each wake's breadth matching the cabin's perpendicular measurement.
Grid: The sea stays empty. Only the vessel and its cardinal wakes are colored.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input shows a rectangle of R hull with inner O cabin? Actually input shows a 4x4 block: outer R border (hull) and inner O 2x2 cabin. Output shows hull and cabin swapped and extended wakes. Let's map coordinates. Input grid 10x10. The vessel located at rows 3-6? Let's index from 0. Input rows 0-9. Rows: 0 all . 1 . 2 . 3: . . . R R R R . . . 4: . . . R O O R . . . 5: . . . R O O R . . . 6: . . . R R R R . . . others empty. So hull is a 4x4 square of R with inner 2x2 O. Output: hull and cabin swapped: inner becomes hull? Let's see output rows: Row1 (index1): . . . R R R R . . . (hull row appears at row1) Row2: . . . R R R R . . . Row3: . R R O O O O R R . Row4: . R R O R R O R R . Row5: . R R O R R O R R . Row6: . R R O O O O R R . Row7: . . . R R R R . . . Row8: . . . R R R R . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . So original hull (R) moved outward? The original inner O becomes new hull? In output, the central area (rows3-6, cols3-6) now has O and R pattern. Let's examine central 4x4 region (rows3-6, cols3-6). It appears as: Rows3 (index3): cols3-6 = O O O O (all O) Row4: O R R O Row5: O R R O Row6: O O O O So that's a 4x4 square where outer border is O, inner 2x2 is R. That's swapped colors: hull becomes O, cabin becomes R. So swap colors. Now the "wakes": The original hull color (R) flows outward in four cardinal directions, each wake's breadth matching the cabin's perpendicular measurement. Cabin size originally 2x2, so its perpendicular measurement (width) = 2. So wakes of R extend outward from the hull? In output we see extra R rows above and below the original hull region: rows1-2 and rows7-8 have R rows of width 4 (same as hull width). Indeed rows1-2 have R R R R at cols3-6. That's a wake upward of breadth 2 (matching cabin width). Similarly rows7-8 downward. Also left and right wakes? In output, columns left/right of central region have R columns? Let's see row3 (index3) has . R R O O O O R R . So there are R columns at cols1-2 and cols7-8. That's left/right wakes of width 2. Similarly rows4-6 have same pattern. Thus rule: Identify a rectangular "vessel": outer border of one color (hull) surrounding inner rectangle of another color (cabin). Swap colors (hull becomes cabin color, cabin becomes hull color). Then extend the original hull color outward in cardinal directions (up, down, left, right) forming "wakes" of thickness equal to the size of the cabin's dimension perpendicular to direction (i.e., the width of cabin for vertical wakes, height for horizontal wakes). The wakes are filled with original hull color. Essentially create a plus-shaped extension of original hull color outward by a distance equal to cabin size (maybe number of cells). In example cabin size 2x2, so extend 2 cells outward in each direction. Now test input: grid 12x12. Contains two vessels? Let's examine. There is one at top-left area rows1-4 cols1-3? Actually rows: Row1 index1: . A A A . . . . . . . . Row2: . A G A . . . . ... [8566 chars truncated]
"A capacitor undergoes polarity reversal — the dielectric and the plates swap charge colors — then the old plate voltage radiates along the four trace directions, each trace as wide as the dielectric gap measured crosswise."
120b: k=3
See: An empty circuit board with a single component: outer plates of one charge-color enclosing a dielectric of another.
Do: Reverse polarity — plates become dielectric color, dielectric becomes plate color. Then the old plate color extends as traces in four cardinal directions, each trace's width matching the dielectric's perpendicular dimension.
Grid: The board remains bare except for the component and its four cardinal traces.
We need to understand rule. From examples. We have a component: outer plates of one color enclosing a dielectric of another. Input shows a rectangle of outer color (plate) surrounding inner region of another color (dielectric). For example1: outer R, inner O (orange). Input shows a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Example1 input: rows 0-9. At rows 3-6 columns 3-6 there is a 4x4 block: outer ring of R, inner 2x2 O. Indeed pattern: R R R R top row, then R O O R, etc. Output: The colors swapped: outer becomes dielectric color? Actually description: Reverse polarity — plates become dielectric color, dielectric becomes plate color. Then the old plate color extends as traces in four cardinal directions, each trace's width matching the dielectric's perpendicular dimension. So after swapping, the outer ring becomes O (dielectric) and inner becomes R (plate). Then the old plate color (R) extends as traces outward in four directions, width equal to dielectric's perpendicular dimension (i.e., the size of the inner region? The inner region originally O size 2x2, so its perpendicular dimension is 2? So trace width = 2? Let's see output. Output shows a larger shape: At rows 1-8 columns? Let's examine output grid for example1. I'll reconstruct coordinates. Input block at rows 3-6, cols 3-6. Output: rows 1-8 have pattern. Row1 (index1): ". . . R R R R . . ." (row1). So a horizontal line of R length 4 at cols3-6. That's trace extending upward from original plate? Original plate color R now becomes inner (plate) after swap, but also extends outward as traces. The trace width equals dielectric's perpendicular dimension = original inner O size = 2? But we see width 4? Wait trace width maybe equals outer dimension? Let's analyze. In output, there is a plus shape of R extending outward from the original component. The central region now is a 4x4 block where outer is O and inner is R? Let's see output rows 3-6 columns 3-6. Row3 (index3): ". R R O O O O R R .". That's row3. So at cols1-2? Actually there are R at col1-2? Let's index: columns 0-9. Row3: col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 '.'? Wait row3 string: ". R R O O O O R R .". So col0 '.' col1 'R' col2 'R' col3 'O' col4 'O' col5 'O' col6 'O' col7 'R' col8 'R' col9 '.'. So central region now 6x? The original component expanded horizontally with R traces of width 2 on each side? The inner O region now is 4x4? Actually O region now occupies cols3-6 rows3-6 (a 4x4 block). That's the former outer ring turned O, but now it's solid O (no inner R). The inner R region (plate) is now a 2x2 block at center? Let's see rows4-5 columns4-5 maybe. Row4: ". R R O R R O R R .". So O at col3, R at col4-5, O at col6. So inner R 2x2 at cols4-5 rows4-5. Yes. Thus after swap, we have outer O ring (now solid O) and inner R 2x2. Then traces of R extend outward from the original outer ring? Actually we see R traces of width 2 extending up, down, left, right from the component. For example, rows1-2 have R rows at cols3-6 (width 4). Tha ... [12730 chars truncated]
"A cursed amulet inverts its enchantment — the outer seal absorbs the inner gem's essence while the gem radiates the seal's power — then the old seal's runes blaze outward along the four compass ley lines, each line as broad as the gem measured crosswise."
120b: k=1
See: A void with a single artifact: an outer seal in one color encasing an inner gem in another.
Do: The seal and gem exchange their essences. Then the old seal color projects along four cardinal ley lines, each line's width matching the gem's perpendicular dimension.
Grid: The void stays empty except for the artifact and its ley line projections.
We need to infer rule from example. Input shows a square of outer seal color R (red) forming a border around inner gem O (orange) a 2x2 block? Actually input: a 4x4 block: rows 4-7 columns 4-7? Let's map coordinates (0-index). Input grid 10x10. The artifact: outer seal color R forms a 4x4 square? Let's view: rows 3-6 (0-index) columns 3-6 have pattern: row3: R R R R ; row4: R O O R ; row5: R O O R ; row6: R R R R. So outer seal is red border, inner gem is orange 2x2. Output: The seal and gem exchange essences: So outer border becomes orange? In output, we see many orange O's where previously red border? Let's examine output rows 3-6 columns 3-6: row3: R R R R (same as input) actually output row3 (index3) is ". . . . . . . . . ."?? Wait output row0-9 given. Let's list output rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . R R R R . . . 2: . . . R R R R . . . 3: . R R O O O O R R . 4: . R R O R R O R R . 5: . R R O R R O R R . 6: . R R O O O O R R . 7: . . . R R R R . . . 8: . . . R R R R . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . So the artifact expanded outward with lines. The old seal color (red) projects along four cardinal ley lines, each line's width matching the gem's perpendicular dimension. Gem's perpendicular dimension: gem is 2x2 square, its perpendicular dimension (height?) maybe width =2. So lines of width 2 of red extending outward from the original border? In output, we see red lines extending outward from the original square, forming a plus shape of width 2? Let's see: original square center at rows3-6 col3-6. In output, red appears in a larger shape: rows1-2 col3-6 are red (two rows above). Also rows7-8 col3-6 red (two rows below). Also columns1-2 rows3-6 red (two columns left). Also columns7-8 rows3-6 red (two columns right). So indeed red lines of width 2 extending outward from the original border, matching gem's dimension (2). The original border (seal) becomes orange? In output, the original border (the outer ring) now appears orange? Let's check rows3-6 col3-6: In output, the outer ring (positions where either row=3 or row=6 or col=3 or col=6) are O except corners? Row3 col3-6 are O O O O (yes). Row4 col3 and col6 are O, interior col4-5 are R (since gem swapped). Row5 similar. Row6 col3-6 O O O O. So indeed the outer seal color (red) swapped with gem color (orange). The inner gem becomes red (the previous seal). So swap colors of border and interior. Now also the red lines extend outward with width equal to gem's perpendicular dimension (2). So we need to apply to test input. Test input grid 12x12. Contains two artifacts? Let's examine: There is a top-left artifact: rows1-4 columns1-3? Actually rows1: ". A A A . . . . . . . ." (col1-3 A). Row2: ". A G A . . . . . . . ." (A G A). Row3: ". A A A . . . . . . . ." So a 3x3 outer border of A (azure) with inner gem G (green) 1x1? Actually inner gem is a single G at center (row2 col2). So outer seal A forms a 3x3 square, inner gem G is 1x1. Second artifact at bottom right: rows6-9 columns6-9? Let's se ... [8021 chars truncated]
"The ensemble performs a do-si-do of color — inner dancers take the outer ring's sashes and the ring takes the center's — then the old ring color glides outward in four cardinal lines like dancers chassing toward the wings, each line as many abreast as the center was deep."
120b: k=2
See: An empty floor with a single formation: an outer ring in one sash-color encircling center dancers in another.
Do: Swap sash colors between ring and center. The original ring color then extends in four cardinal lines, each line's width matching the center's perpendicular count of dancers.
Grid: The floor stays clear except for the formation and its four cardinal extensions.
We need to infer rule. From description: outer ring in one color encircling center dancers in another. Swap sash colors between ring and center. Original ring color then extends in four cardinal lines, each line's width matching the center's perpendicular count of dancers. Interpretation: Input has a square block: outer ring of one color, inner block (center) of another color (maybe 2x2?). In examples, we see. Example1 Input: a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input shows R outer ring and O inner 2x2? Actually pattern: Rows 3-6 columns 3-6 (0-index?). Let's draw: Row3: . . . R R R R . . . Row4: . . . R O O R . . . Row5: . . . R O O R . . . Row6: . . . R R R R . . . So outer ring of R (size 4x4) with inner 2x2 of O. So ring thickness 1. Output: The ring color (R) swapped with center (O) inside? Let's see output region rows 2-7 columns 2-7 maybe. Output rows: Row2: . . . R R R R . . . Row3: . . . R R R R . . . Row4: . R R O O O O R R . Row5: . R R O R R O R R . Row6: . R R O R R O R R . Row7: . R R O O O O R R . Row8: . . . R R R R . . . Row9: . . . R R R R . . . Now the shape is larger: a plus shape? Actually we see a 6x6 region? Let's examine: The original 4x4 block became a 6x6 with ring extended outward in cardinal directions (up, down, left, right) by width equal to center's perpendicular count. Center's perpendicular count: inner O block size is 2x2, so its width =2. So extend ring outward by 2 cells in each direction? Indeed original ring of R now appears as a thicker plus shape: there is a central 2x2 O region? Wait output central area: rows4-7 columns4-7? Let's locate O's. Rows4 (index starting 0) line: ". R R O O O O R R ." Positions: after leading dot, then space? Let's index columns 0-9. Row4: col0 '.'; col1 'R'; col2 'R'; col3 'O'; col4 'O'; col5 'O'; col6 'O'; col7 'R'; col8 'R'; col9 '.'. So O block is 4x4? Actually O's form a 4x4 square (rows4-7, cols3-6). That's larger than original 2x2. So inner O expanded to size equal to original ring thickness? Wait original ring thickness 1, inner size 2. After transformation, inner O becomes size 4? That's double. Let's analyze rule: Swap colors: ring becomes O, center becomes R? In output, the outermost ring (the plus shape) is R? Actually the outermost border of the shape (the extended lines) are R. The interior region (the central square) is O? Let's see: In output, there is a central 4x4 O region, surrounded by R ring of thickness 1? But also there are extensions outward: the shape is like a larger square with a hole? Actually look at rows2-9 columns2-9: shape forms a 8x8? Let's map. Better to think: The original ring color (R) extends outward in four cardinal lines, each line's width matching the center's perpendicular count of dancers (i.e., the size of the inner block). The inner block becomes the ring color? Wait "Swap sash colors between ring and center. The original ring color then extends in four cardinal lines, each line's width matching the center's perpendicular co ... [11131 chars truncated]
"A geode cracks open and crystallizes inside-out — the rind takes the crystal hue, the crystals take the rind's — then veins of the old rind mineral propagate along the four cardinal fault lines, each vein as thick as the crystal cavity measured crosswise."
120b: k=2
See: Bare bedrock with a single geode: an outer rind of one mineral color enclosing crystals of another.
Do: Invert the mineralogy — rind becomes crystal color, crystals become rind color. Then the old rind mineral extends as veins along four cardinal faults, each vein's thickness matching the crystal cavity's perpendicular dimension.
Grid: Bedrock remains bare except for the geode and its cardinal veins.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have a grid with a "geode": outer rind of one mineral color enclosing crystals of another. In example 1 input: there is a 4x4 block? Let's examine. Input example1: coordinates (row, col). The pattern: rows 3-6 (0-index?) Actually grid 10x10. Rows 3: "... R R R R ..." (col 3-6 are R) Row4: "... R O O R ..." Row5: "... R O O R ..." Row6: "... R R R R ..." So it's a 4x4 square of R outer border with O interior 2x2. That's a geode: rind color R, crystal color O. Output example1: The rind becomes crystal color (so O becomes outer?) Let's see output: The central area now has O as outer? Output rows: Row1: all . Row2: "... R R R R ..." (same as input row3) Row3: "... R R R R ..." (row4? Actually row3 now has R R R R) Row4: ". R R O O O O R R ." Row5: ". R R O R R O R R ." Row6: ". R R O R R O R R ." Row7: ". R R O O O O R R ." Row8: "... R R R R ..." Row9: "... R R R R ..." Row10: all . So the original 4x4 geode turned into a larger shape: a 8x8? Let's analyze. Original geode size: outer dimension 4 (including rind). Inner cavity dimension 2 (crystal). After transformation, the rind color (R) becomes crystal color? Actually output shows O as inner? Let's see: In output, the central region (rows4-7, cols3-8?) has O forming a plus? Wait. Let's map coordinates. Input geode top-left at (3,3) (0-index). Outer size 4. After transformation, we see a larger shape centered same? The output shows a 8x8 shape with outer border of R? Actually outermost border of shape is R (same as original rind). Inside that, there is a region of O forming a diamond? Let's examine row4 output: ". R R O O O O R R .". That's row index 3 (0-index). Columns: at col1 '.'; col2 R; col3 R; col4 O; col5 O; col6 O; col7 O; col8 R; col9 R; col10 '.'. So there is a 2x2 block of O? Actually O runs from col4 to col7 (4 cells). That's width 4. Row5 output: ". R R O R R O R R .": O at col4, col7; R at col5,6. Row6 same as row5. Row7: ". R R O O O O R R .": O from col4-7 again. Thus shape is like original rind expanded outward by thickness equal to inner dimension (2) along cardinal directions. The original rind (R) becomes the new "crystal" (inner) maybe? Let's think: The rule says: invert mineralogy — rind becomes crystal color, crystals become rind color. Then the old rind mineral extends as veins along four cardinal faults, each vein's thickness matching the crystal cavity's perpendicular dimension. Interpretation: Original rind color (R) becomes new crystal color (i.e., interior). Original crystal color (O) becomes new rind color (i.e., outer border). Then we also add "veins" of the old rind color extending outward from the original geode along up/down/left/right, with thickness equal to the original crystal cavity's perpendicular dimension (i.e., the inner dimension). In example1, original inner dimension is 2 (since O block 2x2). So we add veins of old rind color (R) of thickness 2 extending outward in four di ... [10704 chars truncated]
"A stuffed pastry is flipped inside-out so the filling becomes the crust, then the old crust oozes out the sides like molten cheese escaping a pressed sandwich."
120b: fail
See: A neat parcel sitting on an empty baking sheet — golden dough wrapped around a colored filling.
Do: Invert the parcel so the filling is now on the outside and the dough is trapped within. The former crust then spreads outward in four cardinal ribbons, each ribbon as wide as the filling was deep (or as tall as it was wide), hugging the parcel's silhouette.
Grid: The baking sheet stays clean except where the parcel and its overflow sit.
We need to infer rule from example. Input shows a shape: a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input example1: grid 10x10. There's a rectangle of R border with O interior? Actually pattern: rows 3-6 columns 3-6 (0-index?). Let's visualize: At rows 3-6, columns 3-6: a 4x4 block. Outer ring R, inner 2x2 O. So shape is a filled square with border color R and interior O. Output: The shape seems expanded outward with ribbons. Output shows larger pattern: The original shape seems turned inside-out? Let's see output grid: rows 1-8 columns? Output shows R border expanded outward forming plus shape? Let's map. Output rows: 0 all . 1 . . . R R R R . . . 2 . . . R R R R . . . 3 . R R O O O O R R . 4 . R R O R R O R R . 5 . R R O R R O R R . 6 . R R O O O O R R . 7 . . . R R R R . . . 8 . . . R R R R . . . 9 all . So shape now is 8x8? Actually outermost R region forms a 4x4 block at rows1-2 cols3-6 and rows7-8 same. And also a larger plus shape? Let's think of transformation: "Invert the parcel so the filling is now on the outside and the dough is trapped within. The former crust then spreads outward in four cardinal ribbons, each ribbon as wide as the filling was deep (or as tall as it was wide), hugging the parcel's silhouette." Interpretation: Original shape: dough = border (R) wrapping filling (O). Invert: filling becomes outside, dough inside. So O becomes outer region, R becomes inner core? In output, O appears in larger area (the plus shape) while R appears as inner cross? Actually output shows O in a plus shape of width 4? Let's examine: O appears in rows3-6 columns4-7? Wait row3: . R R O O O O R R . So O occupies columns5-8? Actually count: indices: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 R,4 R,5 O,6 O,7 O,8 O,9 R,10 R,11 .? Wait grid size 10 columns originally. Let's index 0-9. Row3: positions:0 .,1 .,2 R?, Actually row3 string: ". R R O O O O R R .". That's 10 entries: col0 .,1 R,2 R,3 O,4 O,5 O,6 O,7 R,8 R,9 . So O occupies cols3-6 (4 cells). R occupies cols1-2 and 7-8. So O region is a 4x4 square? rows3-6 O region forms 4x4 square. Indeed rows3-6 each have O in cols3-6. So O forms a 4x4 block (the original interior size 2x2 expanded to 4x4). R forms a border around that block of thickness 2? Actually R appears as a 2-cell thick border? Let's see rows1-2 have R block cols3-6 (4x4) but no O. That's like top ribbon of R. Similarly rows7-8 bottom ribbon of R. And left/right ribbons of R at rows3-6 cols1-2 and 7-8. So R forms a plus shape of thickness 2 extending outward, width equal to original interior size (2) maybe? The description: "former crust then spreads outward in four cardinal ribbons, each ribbon as wide as the filling was deep (or as tall as it was wide)". Original filling (O) depth = 2 (height). So ribbons width = 2. Indeed R ribbons are width 2 cells outward from original shape. Thus transformation: Take original shape with border color C1 and interior color C2. Create new shape where interior color C2 expands to fill a larger square equal to original bor ... [11386 chars truncated]
"A chord inverts — the bass note leaps to the top register and the melody drops below — then resonance bleeds outward like sympathetic strings vibrating along the neck."
120b: fail
See: A quiet staff with a single chord block: an outer voice surrounding an inner voice, each in its own timbre.
Do: Invert the chord so the outer voice now occupies the interior and the inner voice wraps around it. The original outer timbre then resonates outward along the horizontal and vertical axes of the score, each resonance band as thick as the inner voice was in the perpendicular dimension.
Grid: The staff remains silent except where the chord and its resonance occupy space.
We need to infer rule from example. Input shows a 10x10 grid with a block of R and O forming a 4x4 square with inner 2x2 O and outer ring of R. Output shows transformation: outer ring becomes interior? Let's examine. Input coordinates (0-index). The block at rows 3-6, cols 3-6 (4x4). Pattern: R R R R R O O R R O O R R R R R Output shows larger pattern 8x8? Actually output grid same size 10x10. Output shows the original block expanded? Let's view output rows 1-8 maybe. Output rows: row0 all . row1: . . . R R R R . . . row2: . . . R R R R . . . row3: . R R O O O O R R . row4: . R R O R R O R R . row5: . R R O R R O R R . row6: . R R O O O O R R . row7: . . . R R R R . . . row8: . . . R R R R . . . row9 all . So original 4x4 block turned into a 8x8? Actually pattern now occupies rows1-8, cols3-6? Wait coordinates: In output, the outermost R ring now appears at rows1-2 and rows7-8 (top and bottom) and also columns3-6? Let's map. The new shape seems like original outer ring (R) moved to interior? The description: invert chord so outer voice now occupies interior and inner voice wraps around it. Original outer timbre resonates outward along horizontal and vertical axes, each resonance band as thick as inner voice was in perpendicular dimension. Interpretation: Original shape: outer ring thickness = 1 cell (R). Inner region thickness = also 1? Actually inner region is 2x2 O (inner voice). So inner voice thickness maybe 2? Not sure. Transformation: Swap outer and inner: inner becomes outer ring (surrounding), outer becomes inner core. Then outer also extends outward along axes with thickness equal to inner's thickness in perpendicular dimension. In example, inner O (2x2) becomes new outer ring of O surrounding a core of R? Let's see output: In rows3-6, columns4-5 maybe O? Actually output rows3-6 have O in a 4x4 region? Let's extract subgrid rows3-6, cols3-6 (0-index). Row3 col3=R? Wait row3: ". R R O O O O R R .". Indices: 0 '.' 1 'R' 2 'R' 3 'O' 4 'O' 5 'O' 6 'O' 7 'R' 8 'R' 9 '.'. So columns3-6 are O O O O (all O). Row4: ". R R O R R O R R .": columns3-6 = O R R O. Row5 same. Row6: ". R R O O O O R R .": columns3-6 = O O O O. So we have a 4x4 block where outer ring is O (now outer voice) and inner 2x2 is R (original outer). Indeed outer ring O surrounds inner R. That's inversion. Now also there are extra R bands extending outward horizontally and vertically, thickness equal to inner voice thickness in perpendicular dimension. Original inner voice thickness? The inner O region was 2 cells thick in both dimensions (since it's 2x2). So thickness =2? The resonance bands are R of thickness 2? Let's see: In output, there are R bands extending up/down/left/right from the 4x4 block. For example, above the block rows1-2 have R's forming a 4x4 block same width as original outer ring? Actually rows1-2 columns3-6 are R R R R (full). That's a band of thickness 2 rows (since inner thickness 2) extending upward. Similarly rows7-8 have R's. Also left side co ... [10405 chars truncated]
"A defensive formation swaps jerseys — guards become forwards and forwards become guards — then the old guard color sprints outward to set screens in the four cardinal lanes."
120b: fail
See: A compact formation on an empty court: a perimeter squad in one jersey enclosing a core squad in another.
Do: The squads swap jerseys in place, then the original perimeter color extends outward in four straight lanes (up, down, left, right), each lane as wide as the core was perpendicular to the direction of extension.
Grid: The court stays empty except for the formation and its lane extensions.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1 input: a 10x10 grid. There's a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input shows a square of R border with O interior? Actually pattern: rows 3-6 columns 3-6 (0-index?). Let's visualize: At rows 3-6, columns 3-6: a 4x4 block. The outer ring (perimeter) of that block is R, interior 2x2 is O. So perimeter color R, core color O. Output: The block expands: The original perimeter color R extends outward in four straight lanes (up, down, left, right), each lane as wide as the core was perpendicular to direction. Core was 2x2 (width 2). So lanes width = 2? In output, we see R lanes of width 2 extending up/down/left/right from the original block. Also the core and perimeter swap jerseys in place: meaning the original core O becomes perimeter? Actually output shows inside the original block, the colors swapped: The original perimeter R becomes interior? Let's examine output central region rows 4-7 columns 4-7 maybe. Output lines: Row3 (0-index?) Let's list output grid rows (0-9). Provided output: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . R R R R . . . 2: . . . R R R R . . . 3: . R R O O O O R R . 4: . R R O R R O R R . 5: . R R O R R O R R . 6: . R R O O O O R R . 7: . . . R R R R . . . 8: . . . R R R R . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . Original block at rows3-6 cols3-6 (0-index). In output, the block now larger 8x8? Actually outermost R lanes at rows1-2 and 7-8 etc. Interpretation: The original perimeter R becomes the core after swap? Let's see central 4x4 region rows4-5 cols4-5 maybe. In output rows4-5 columns4-5 are R (since row4: . R R O R R O R R .). At columns? Let's index: row4: positions: 0 .,1 R,2 R,3 O,4 R,5 R,6 O,7 R,8 R,9 . So central 2x2 (cols4-5) are R. That's original core O now becomes R? Actually original core O was at rows4-5 cols4-5 (0-index). In output they are R. So core swapped to perimeter color. The original perimeter R becomes O in the inner ring? Let's see positions around central: row4 col3 O (was perimeter R originally). So yes swapped. Thus rule: swap colors of perimeter and core within the original shape. Then extend the original perimeter color (now core after swap? Actually extension uses original perimeter color, which after swap becomes core? In output, the extended lanes are of color R (original perimeter). So extension uses original perimeter color (R). Lanes width equals size of core (2) in perpendicular direction. So we create a cross shape of width equal to core size, extending outward from the original shape's perimeter outward. Similarly Example2: Input: a plus? Actually shape: a 3x3 block with Y border and M interior (single cell). Input rows3-5 cols3-5: Y border (3x3) with M at center (row4 col4). So core size 1x1. Output: The Y border and M swap: central becomes Y? Let's see output rows3-5 cols3-5: row3: . . . Y Y Y . . . . (same as input). Row4: . . Y M M M Y . . . (so central row now has M M M across? Wait). Let's map. Output row4: . . Y M M M Y . . . . So at columns3-5 we h ... [10739 chars truncated]
"The eye of the storm swallows the eyewall's color while the eyewall takes on the eye's calm hue, and pressure bands radiate outward along the compass lines like squall lines fleeing the center."
120b: k=2
See: A calm void with a single storm system: a wall of one pressure-color encircling an eye of another.
Do: The eye and eyewall exchange their pressure signatures. Then the old wall color pushes outward in four cardinal bands, each band's cross-section matching the eye's dimension perpendicular to the band's direction.
Grid: The void remains calm. Only the storm and its cardinal squall bands carry color.
We need to infer rule. From examples. We have a "storm": a wall of one color encircling an eye of another. Input shows a square of outer color (wall) and inner region (eye). Example1: outer wall color R (red) forming a 4x4 square? Let's examine input1 coordinates. Input grid 10x10. The storm appears at rows 3-6 columns 3-6 (0-index?). Actually rows 3-6 (0-index) have R forming border and O inside? Input1: rows 3: ". . . R R R R . . ." (R 4 in a row). Row4: ". . . R O O R . . ." (R at ends, O inside). Row5 same. Row6: ". . . R R R R . . .". So shape: a 4x4 block: outer border R, inner 2x2 O. That's a "wall" of R encircling eye of O. Output1: The eye and eyewall exchange their pressure signatures. So outer becomes O? Let's see output: The region expands outward in four cardinal bands, each band's cross-section matching the eye's dimension perpendicular to the band's direction. Output1 shows larger pattern: The original 4x4 becomes central part of larger shape. Let's map. Output1 rows: row1 all .; row2 ". . . R R R R . . ." (same as input row3). row3 same. row4 ". R R O O O O R R ." etc. Let's reconstruct. It seems the original wall (R) becomes inner now? Actually after exchange, eye becomes wall? Let's analyze. Input: outer R, inner O. Output: The central region (where originally O) now appears as O? Let's see output row4: ". R R O O O O R R .". That's a row with R R O O O O R R. So there is a band of O of width 4? The original O 2x2 becomes expanded to 4x4? The outer R band now appears as a ring of thickness 2? Let's think. The description: "eye and eyewall exchange their pressure signatures. Then the old wall color pushes outward in four cardinal bands, each band's cross-section matching the eye's dimension perpendicular to the band's direction." Interpretation: Swap colors: the eye becomes wall color, the wall becomes eye color. Then the old wall color (now eye color after swap?) pushes outward in four cardinal directions, forming bands whose cross-section matches the eye's dimension perpendicular to direction. Let's test with example1. Original: wall color = R, eye color = O, eye dimensions: 2x2 (height=2, width=2). After swap: eye becomes R, wall becomes O. So central region (where original eye) becomes R? In output, central region (around center) appears to be R? Let's see output row5: ". R R O R R O R R .". That's row5 (index 4). Contains pattern: R R O R R O R R. Hard. Maybe better to view final shape: It seems there is a plus-shaped band of O extending outward from original wall? Let's compute. In output, there is a larger 8x8 region from rows2-7 columns2-7? Let's list output grid coordinates (10x10). I'll write rows with indices. Row0: all . Row1: ". . . R R R R . . ." Row2: ". . . R R R R . . ." Row3: ". R R O O O O R R ." Row4: ". R R O R R O R R ." Row5: ". R R O R R O R R ." Row6: ". R R O O O O R R ." Row7: ". . . R R R R . . ." Row8: ". . . R R R R . . ." Row9: all . So shape is a 8x8? Actually non-blank region from r ... [11290 chars truncated]
"A building undergoes façade inversion — the exterior cladding retreats inside while the interior finish wraps the outside — then flying buttresses of the old cladding extend outward along the cardinal walls."
120b: fail
See: An empty lot with a single building footprint: outer walls in one material surrounding interior rooms in another.
Do: Swap the materials — walls become rooms, rooms become walls. Then the original wall material projects outward from each face as buttresses, each buttress as deep as the interior was wide perpendicular to that face.
Grid: The lot remains empty save for the building and its buttress extensions.
We need to understand the transformation. The description: empty lot with a single building footprint: outer walls in one material surrounding interior rooms in another. Swap materials: walls become rooms, rooms become walls. Then original wall material projects outward from each face as buttresses, each buttress as deep as the interior was wide perpendicular to that face. Interpretation: Input contains a rectangular shape (maybe square) where outer border is one color (wall) and interior is another color (room). In example 1, input shows a 4x4 block? Let's examine. Example1 input grid 10x10. The building appears at rows 3-6 (0-index?). Let's map coordinates. Input rows (0-index): 0: all . 1: all . 2: all . 3: . . . R R R R . . . 4: . . . R O O R . . . 5: . . . R O O R . . . 6: . . . R R R R . . . 7-9 all . So building is a 4x4 square? Actually outer wall R forms a 4x4 border: rows 3-6, cols 3-6. Inside interior is 2x2 O at rows4-5, cols4-5. So outer wall color R, interior O. Output grid: Let's see output rows: 0: all . 1: . . . R R R R . . . 2: . . . R R R R . . . 3: . R R O O O O R R . 4: . R R O R R O R R . 5: . R R O R R O R R . 6: . R R O O O O R R . 7: . . . R R R R . . . 8: . . . R R R R . . . 9: all . So output shows the original building expanded outward with buttresses. The original outer wall R becomes interior (rooms) after swap? Let's analyze. Original outer wall R becomes interior after swap: In output, the central area (where original interior O was) now has R as walls? Actually output central 4x4 region (rows3-6, cols3-6) now has pattern: corners? Let's extract. Rows3-6, cols3-6: Row3 (index3): columns3-6: O O O O? Wait row3 output: ". R R O O O O R R .". So columns: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. At col3 = O, col4=O, col5=O, col6=O. So row3 interior is O O O O. Row4: ". R R O R R O R R .": col3=O, col4=R, col5=R, col6=O. Row5: same as row4. Row6: ". R R O O O O R R .": col3=O, col4=O, col5=O, col6=O. Thus the original interior O (2x2) became a larger O region (4x4) after transformation? Actually original interior O was 2x2 at rows4-5, cols4-5. After transformation, O occupies a plus shape? Let's see: O now occupies a 4x4 region with a cross of R inside? Wait O occupies outer ring of that 4x4, while R occupies inner 2x2. So indeed swapped: original interior O becomes outer ring (walls) and original outer wall R becomes inner region (rooms). So swap of materials. Now buttresses: original outer wall material (R) projects outward from each face as buttresses, each buttress as deep as the interior was wide perpendicular to that face. Original interior width: interior O was 2 cells wide (both dimensions). So buttress depth = 2? In output, we see R extends outward beyond original building by 2 cells on each side? Let's check: original building outer wall at rows3-6, cols3-6. In output, there are extra R rows above and below: rows1-2 and rows7-8 have R rows of width 4 (cols3-6). Indeed rows1-2 have R R R R at cols3-6. That's 2 rows ou ... [11639 chars truncated]
"A besieged citadel performs a desperate sortie: the garrison and the besiegers swap positions, then the old siege color charges outward in four columns along the roads radiating from the fortress."
120b: fail
See: An empty battlefield with a single fortification: outer ramparts in one banner surrounding an inner garrison in another.
Do: The garrison and ramparts exchange banners. Then the old rampart color surges outward in four cardinal columns, each column's width matching the garrison's perpendicular extent.
Grid: The battlefield stays bare except for the fortress and its four sally columns.
We need to infer rule from example. Input shows a square fortress: outer ramparts in one color surrounding inner garrison in another. In example1 input: outer rampart color? The shape: a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 10x10. At rows 3-6 columns 3-6 (0-index?). Actually rows 3-6 (0-index) have R and O. The outer border of that block is R, inner 2x2 is O. So outer rampart = R, inner garrison = O. Output: The garrison and ramparts exchange banners: So inner becomes R, outer becomes O? Let's see output: At rows 3-6 columns 3-6 we see pattern: outer now O? Actually output rows 3-6 columns 3-6: row3 (index3) ". R R O O O O R R ." Wait that's larger region. Let's examine output grid: Provided output 10x10. Let's write coordinates. I'll reconstruct input matrix indices (0-9). Input rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: all . 3: . . . R R R R . . . 4: . . . R O O R . . . 5: . . . R O O R . . . 6: . . . R R R R . . . 7-9: all . So the fortress is a 4x4 block from rows3-6, cols3-6 (R border) with inner 2x2 O at rows4-5 cols4-5. Output rows: 0: all . 1: . . . R R R R . . . 2: . . . R R R R . . . 3: . R R O O O O R R . 4: . R R O R R O R R . 5: . R R O R R O R R . 6: . R R O O O O R R . 7: . . . R R R R . . . 8: . . . R R R R . . . 9: all . Now we see larger shape: outer rampart color (original R) now forms a plus shape? Actually we have columns and rows of R extending outward forming four cardinal columns of width equal to garrison's perpendicular extent. The garrison's perpendicular extent: original inner O block size is 2x2, so its width in each direction? The description: "old rampart color surges outward in four cardinal columns, each column's width matching the garrison's perpendicular extent." So original rampart color (R) extends outward in four directions (up, down, left, right) as columns/rows of width equal to the size of the inner block (which is 2). Indeed we see R columns of width 2 extending up and down from the original block, and left/right. Specifically, after exchange, the inner becomes original rampart color? Wait inner now appears as O? Let's see output central 2x2 region rows4-5 cols4-5: they are R (since output row4 col4 = R, row4 col5 = R, row5 col4 = R, row5 col5 = R). So inner now R (original rampart). Outer ring now O? Let's see output row3 col3 = O? Actually row3 col3 is O? Row3: ". R R O O O O R R ." So columns: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 R? Wait need index: row3 string: ". R R O O O O R R .". That's 10 entries: col0 .,1 R? Actually there is leading dot then space then R etc. Let's map: col0 ., col1 R, col2 R, col3 O, col4 O, col5 O, col6 O, col7 R, col8 R, col9 . So outer ring now O at positions that were previously R? The original outer border (size 4x4) now becomes O except where the R columns extended? Let's see original outer border positions: rows3-6 cols3-6. In output, those positions are O except the inner 2x2 now R. Indeed row3 col3 (original top-left corner) is O. Row3 col4 O, col5 O, col6 O. Row4 col3 O, col6 O. Row5 c ... [10350 chars truncated]
"The actors swap costumes mid-scene — the chorus dons the lead's colors, the lead takes the chorus robes — then spotlights in the old chorus color extend outward along the stage's cardinal axes like follow-spots chasing exits."
120b: fail
See: A dark stage with a single tableau: a chorus ring in one costume encircling a lead ensemble in another.
Do: Swap costumes between chorus and lead. Then the old chorus color projects as spotlight beams in four cardinal directions, each beam's width matching the lead group's perpendicular span.
Grid: The stage remains dark except for the tableau and its projected spotlights.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input shows a 4x4 block? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 10x10. There's a central shape: a ring of R (red) surrounding a 2x2 O (orange) interior? Actually input shows: Rows 3-6 (0-index?) Let's index rows 0-9. Row3: ... R R R R ... Row4: ... R O O R ... Row5: ... R O O R ... Row6: ... R R R R ... So it's a 4x4 square of R border with O interior 2x2. That's like a "chorus ring" (R) encircling lead ensemble (O). Output shows transformation: swap colors? Let's see output. Output rows: Row1: ... (row0) all . Row1 (row1): ... R R R R ... (same as input row3 moved up one? Actually row1 now has R row) Row2 (row2): ... R R R R ... (same) Row3 (row3): . R R O O O O R R . Row4 (row4): . R R O R R O R R . Row5 (row5): . R R O R R O R R . Row6 (row6): . R R O O O O R R . Row7 (row7): ... R R R R ... Row8 (row8): ... R R R R ... Row9 (row9): all . So output shows larger pattern: the original 4x4 block expanded? Actually appears that the original ring (R) becomes inner ring? Let's analyze. Original: a 4x4 block with border R, interior O (2x2). Output: there is a larger 8x8? Let's see coordinates: The output has R border of thickness 2? Let's draw. Positions with R in output: rows1-2 columns3-6 (0-index). That's a 2x4 rectangle? Wait. Better to think: The output seems to have the original O interior turned into R? Actually inside the new shape, there is a cross pattern of R inside O? Let's examine row3 output: . R R O O O O R R . So row3 has R at columns1-2, O at 3-6, R at 7-8. So there is a horizontal band of O length 4 inside R border of thickness 2? Row4: . R R O R R O R R . So inside O region, there is a 2x2 block of R (the original O maybe swapped). So seems like swapping colors: chorus (R) becomes lead (O) and lead becomes chorus (R). Then "spotlights" of old chorus color (R) project outward in four cardinal directions, width matching lead group's perpendicular span. Interpretation: Original chorus ring (R) encircles lead (O). After swap, the lead becomes R (so interior becomes R). The old chorus color (R) becomes beams extending outward from the original ring outward in four directions, width equal to lead group's perpendicular span (i.e., the size of interior). The interior size is 2x2, so width of beams is 2? In output, we see beams of R extending outward from the original ring: Upwards, there are two rows of R above original ring (rows1-2). Downwards also two rows of R (rows7-8). Leftwards and rightwards also two columns of R beyond original ring (columns1-2 and columns7-8). Indeed output shows a larger square of R border thickness 2 around a central region where interior is O? Wait central region now is O? Actually after swap, interior should be R (lead becomes chorus). But output central region (rows3-6, cols3-6) contains O and R mixture: O at positions where originally R? Let's map. Original coordinates: ring at rows3-6, cols3-6 (0-index). Inside O at rows4-5, cols4-5. After transformation: The interi ... [10412 chars truncated]
"A flower bed undergoes petal inversion — the border hedge becomes the bloom and the bloom becomes hedge — then the old hedge sends runners along the cardinal paths, each runner as thick as the bloom was across."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Bare soil with a single planted bed: a hedge border in one color framing blooms of another.
Do: Swap the hedge and bloom colors in place. Then the original hedge color extends outward as runners in four cardinal directions, each runner's thickness matching the bloom's perpendicular dimension.
Grid: Soil stays bare. Only the bed and its runners carry color.
See: The input grid has a black background with one or more columns containing colored cells. Each such column has colored cells scattered vertically in its upper portion, separated by gaps of black cells, with empty space below. A column may contain cells of a single color or multiple colors. When multiple colors appear in a column, they are grouped contiguously from top to bottom (e.g., all red cells appear above all blue cells). The total number of colored cells in each column is always a perfect square (1, 4, 9, 16, ...).
Do: For each column that contains colored cells, do the following independently: (1) Count the total number of colored cells N in that column. Compute the triangle size as sqrt(N), call it S. (2) Record the colors from top to bottom in the column, preserving their order. (3) Clear the entire column. (4) Build a triangle of S rows at the very bottom of the grid, centered on that column. The bottom row of the triangle sits on the last row of the grid. Row widths from top to bottom are 1, 3, 5, ..., 2S-1 (odd numbers). Each row is horizontally centered on the column. (5) Fill the triangle rows with colors from top (narrowest) to bottom (widest). Assign colors in the same top-to-bottom order as they appeared in the input column: the first color fills cells starting from the top row of the triangle, consuming one cell per triangle position left-to-right, top-to-bottom, until that color's count is exhausted, then continue with the next color. All cells not part of any triangle become black.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background is entirely black except for the triangle(s) drawn at the bottom. Multiple columns may each produce their own independent triangle, and these triangles coexist on the grid without overlapping. Triangles are always bottom-aligned (touching the last row) and horizontally centered on their source column.
"Scattered seeds fall and pile into pyramids on the ground."
120b: k=1
See: Against a night sky, colored seeds float in vertical columns — hovering in the upper air, spaced unevenly as if suspended by invisible threads. Some columns hold seeds of a single hue; others carry layers of different colors stacked like geological strata, one color giving way to the next below it. The ground below sits empty, waiting.
Do: Gravity finally switches on. Every floating seed in a column falls, but rather than simply dropping straight down, the seeds accumulate into a neat triangular mound resting on the ground floor — like sand pouring through an hourglass and forming a perfect pile. The colors preserve their original layering: whatever was highest in the sky settles at the peak of the mound, and the deepest colors spread across its wide base. The more seeds that fall, the taller and broader the pyramid they build.
Grid: The sky clears completely — all black — and only the triangular mounds remain, each sitting flush against the bottom edge of the grid, centered beneath where its seeds once floated. If multiple columns had seeds, multiple independent pyramids form side by side, each loyal to its own column. The night reclaims everything the pyramids don't touch.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: seeds floating in vertical columns, then gravity makes them fall forming triangular mound (pyramid) with colors preserving layering: highest in sky becomes peak, deepest colors spread across base. The output shows black (.) everywhere except pyramids at bottom. We need to infer rule from example. Example 1 Input: grid size? Let's count rows: appears 16 rows? Actually lines: Input shows 16 rows? Let's count: lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." repeated. I see 16 rows maybe. Output also 16 rows. In input, there is column with O's at column 7? Let's map. Let's index columns 0-11? Actually each row has 12 entries. So grid 16x12. Input: many O's in column 6 (0-index). Let's list rows with O: Row1 (index0): all . Row2 (1): column6 O (since . . . . . . O . . . . .) yes. Row3 (2): column6 O Row4 (3): all . Row5 (4): column6 O Row6 (5): column6 O Row7 (6): column6 O Row8 (7): all . Row9 (8): column6 O Row10 (9): all . Row11 (10): column6 O Row12 (11): column6 O Row13 (12): column6 O Row14 (13): all . Row15 (14): all . Row16 (15): all . So there are many O's in same column, but not contiguous; they are spaced. Output: bottom rows have pyramid of O's centered at column6? Let's see output rows bottom three rows: Row13 (index12): all . Row14 (13): . . . . . . O . . . . . (single O at column6) Row15 (14): . . . . . O O O . . . . (three O's columns5-7) Row16 (15): . . . . O O O O O . . . (five O's columns4-8) So pyramid of height 3 (rows 13-15) with base width 5. The number of O's originally? Count O's in column6: let's count: rows with O: indices1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,12 = 9 O's. Pyramid of height 3 uses 1+3+5=9 cells. Yes matches. Thus rule: For each column that contains colored cells (non-black), we take all those cells (any colors) and drop them to bottom forming a centered isosceles triangle (pyramid) of that color? Wait colors preserve layering: highest in sky becomes peak, deepest colors spread across base. In example only one color O, so all O. If multiple colors in same column, we need to stack them in order: topmost becomes apex, then next rows of triangle? But description says colors preserve layering: whatever was highest in the sky settles at the peak of the mound, and the deepest colors spread across its wide base. So within a column, there may be multiple colors stacked vertically (maybe different colors). When they fall, they form a triangle where each row of triangle corresponds to a layer of colors? Actually need to think: Suppose column has colors from top to bottom: C1 (top), C2, C3 (bottom). When they fall, they will form triangle of height h where total number of cells = n (number of seeds). The triangle rows have widths 1,3,5,... up to (2h-1). The colors need to fill the triangle such that the apex cell is the topmost original color, and the base cells are the bottommost original colors. But there are more cells than original seeds? No, number of cells equals number of seeds, so ... [6268 chars truncated]
"Dormant spores drift down the spine of an organism and crystallize into a layered exoskeleton at its base."
120b: fail
See: A dark tissue sample with pigmented cells dotting a central nerve column, separated by inert gaps, with blank tissue below.
Do: The pigmented cells migrate downward, shed their scattered arrangement, and fuse into a structured growth anchored at the organism's foundation—each layer broader than the last, like a living coral polyp building outward from its foot.
Grid: The specimen retains its original dimensions. All former cell sites go dark; the structured growth sits flush against the bottom edge, symmetrically straddling the original nerve column.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has vertical column of colored cells (O in ex1, O in ex2, Y,O,M in ex3). Output: they disappear (become .) and a triangle/pyramid of those colors appears anchored at bottom, centered on original column, expanding upward? Let's examine ex1: Input size? 16 rows? Actually given 16 rows? Let's count: Input lines 16? Actually example1 input shows 16 rows? Let's count: lines: 1-? It shows many rows, maybe 16 rows. Output shows bottom rows with O forming triangle: bottom row (row16) has O O O O O (5 O) centered at column 6? Let's map coordinates. We need to understand transformation: The colored cells "migrate downward, shed scattered arrangement, and fuse into a structured growth anchored at the organism's foundation—each layer broader than the last". So they move down to bottom, forming a pyramid (like a triangle) with base at bottom row, apex above, centered on original column. In ex1, original O column at column 6 (0-index?). Input shows O at many rows, same column. Output: bottom row (row16) has O O O O O (5 O) centered at column6? Let's compute: If column index 5 (0-index) is center, then bottom row would have O at columns 3-7 (5 cells). Row15 (second from bottom) has O O O (3 O) at columns 4-6. Row14 (third from bottom) has single O at column5? Actually output row14 shows ". . . . . . O . . . . .". That's a single O at column6 (index5). So pyramid of height 3? Wait bottom row has 5 O, row above 3 O, row above 1 O. That's a triangle of height 3 (levels). So they took the column of O's and turned into a triangle of height equal to number of O's? Input had many O's (maybe 9?). But output triangle height is 3. Let's count O's in input ex1: there are O's at many rows: rows 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13? Actually many. But output only uses 3 rows of O's. So maybe rule: take the count of O's in column, compute n, then produce triangle of size n? Let's count O's: In ex1 input, column 6 has O at rows: 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13 (9 O's). Output triangle height 3 corresponds to sqrt(9)? Since triangle of height h has total cells = h^2 (if using odd numbers 1+3+5+... = h^2). For h=3, total cells =9. Yes! So they convert the column of O's (count =9) into a centered isosceles triangle of height h where h^2 = count. So h = sqrt(count). Since count is perfect square (9). Output triangle of height 3 uses 9 cells. Check ex2: Input O column at column5? Let's count O's: rows with O: row1? Actually input ex2 first row has O at column5 (0-index?). Row4 has O, row7 has O, row10 has O. That's 4 O's. Output triangle: bottom row has O O O (3 O) row above has single O (1 O). That's height 2 triangle total cells = 4. Yes matches sqrt(4)=2. Ex3: Input has Y at column4 (single), O column? Actually there is O at column4 rows 2-4? Let's parse: Input grid 22 rows? Contains Y at row1 col4, O at rows2-4 col4 (three O's). Also M's at various rows col4 (multiple). Let's count each color separately? Output shows Y at bottom row (row20?) Actually ... [10468 chars truncated]
"Stars strung along a filament collapse under gravity and accrete into a conical nebula at the galactic floor."
120b: k=2
See: A dark void with luminous points of different colors spaced along a single cosmic filament, empty space below.
Do: The filament destabilizes and each star falls, accreting into a nebula—the first arrival forms a lone point at the apex, each subsequent shell wider, their spectral colors ordered as they were originally strung, the broadest shell touching the lowest edge of the field.
Grid: The void retains its dimensions. All former star positions go dark; the nebula sits at the bottom, centered on the filament's axis.
We need to understand transformation. We have examples. Let's parse. Example1 input: grid size? appears 16 rows? Actually given 16 rows? Let's count lines: Input lines: there are 16 rows? Let's count: lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." repeated. I see 16 rows? Actually list: row1, row2, row3, row4, row5, row6, row7, row8, row9, row10, row11, row12, row13, row14, row15, row16. Yes 16 rows, each 12 columns? Wait each row has 12 entries. So grid 16x12. In input, there is a vertical line of O's (orange) at column 7? Let's index columns 1-12. Row2 has O at col7. Row3 O at col7. Row5 O at col7. Row6 O at col7. Row7 O at col7. Row9 O at col7. Row11 O at col7. Row12 O at col7. Row13 O at col7. So many O's forming a vertical filament (column 7). Some rows have O's, others not. So pattern: a column of O's with gaps? Actually rows 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13 have O. That's many. Output: same dimensions 16x12. Output shows O's forming a triangle/pyramid at bottom centered on column 7. Let's examine output rows: bottom rows rows 14-16 have O's. Row14: ". . . . . . O . . . . .": O at col7 (single). Row15: ". . . . . O O O . . . .": O at cols6,7,8 (3). Row16: ". . . . O O O O O . . .": O at cols5-9 (5). So a pyramid of height 3 (rows 14-16) with base width 5, centered column 7. The original vertical line of O's collapsed into this pyramid at bottom. Observation: The number of O's in input? Count O's: rows with O: row2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13 = 9 O's. Output pyramid has total O count: 1+3+5 = 9. So they redistributed O's into a centered triangle (odd widths) at bottom, preserving count and order? The description: "first arrival forms a lone point at the apex, each subsequent shell wider, their spectral colors ordered as they were originally strung". So they take the sequence of colors along the filament (top to bottom?) and create concentric shells (rows) from top to bottom of pyramid, preserving order of colors. In example1, all O's same color, so order irrelevant. Example2: Input grid 16x10? Actually rows 16, columns 10. Input shows O's at column6? Let's see: row1 has O at col6. row4 O at col6. row7 O at col6. row10 O at col6. So four O's vertical line. Output: bottom rows rows15-16 have O's: row15: ". . . . . O . . . .": O at col6 (apex). Row16: ". . . . O O O . . .": O at cols5,6,7 (base width 3). That's total O count 4 (1+3). So pyramid height 2 (apex row15, base row16). So they used 4 O's to make pyramid of size 2 rows (odd widths 1 and 3). Works. Thus rule: Given a vertical line (filament) of same column of colored cells (could be multiple colors), we need to collapse them into a centered triangle/pyramid at bottom of grid, using same colors in order from top to bottom to fill rows from top of pyramid (apex) downwards, each row having odd number of cells (1,3,5,...). The colors are placed left-to-right across each row preserving order? For multiple colors, need to see ordering. But we only have single color examples. In test input, there are multiple co ... [7798 chars truncated]
"Signal flags run up a halyard are struck and draped over the bowsprit in a ceremonial bunting."
120b: fail
See: A dark harbor with colored pennants clipped at intervals along a single vertical halyard, open water below.
Do: The pennants are hauled down and re-dressed as bunting along the bow—the topmost flag becomes the single peak pennant, each swag below it wider, their colors kept in the order they flew, the widest swag kissing the waterline.
Grid: The harbor view keeps its dimensions. The halyard is bare; only the bunting remains, draped at the very bottom and centered under the mast line.
We need to infer rule. From description: vertical halyard with colored pennants at intervals along a single vertical line. They are hauled down and re-dressed as bunting along the bottom, centered under the mast line. Essentially we take the column of colored cells (non-.) in input, which are aligned vertically (maybe with gaps). Then we move them to bottom rows, forming a triangle/pyramid shape centered horizontally under the original column. The topmost flag becomes the single peak, each row below wider, colors kept order they flew (top to bottom). The widest row touches waterline (bottommost row). So we need to produce output where the colored cells are arranged in a triangle with apex at some row near bottom, base at bottom row, centered under original column. Let's examine examples. Example1: Input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 16 rows? Actually list shows 16 rows? Let's count: lines from Input: there are 16 rows? Let's count: lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row1) 2 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row2) 3 same (row3) 4 all . (row4) 5 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row5) 6 row6 same (row6) 7 row7 same (row7) 8 row8 all . (row8) 9 row9 O (row9) 10 row10 all . (row10) 11 row11 O (row11) 12 row12 O (row12) 13 row13 O (row13) 14 row14 all . (row14) 15 row15 all . (row15) 16 row16 all . (row16). So 16 rows, 13 columns? Actually each row has 13 entries. The column with O appears at column 7 (0-index maybe). So there are many O's at various rows, not contiguous: rows 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13. That's 9 O's. Output: same dimensions 16x13. The O's are now at bottom rows forming triangle: rows 14,15,16? Let's see output rows: row1-13 all . (first 13 rows). Row14: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." (single O at column7). Row15: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." (three O's centered at column6-8). Row16: ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." (five O's centered at columns5-9). So triangle height 3 rows (apex row14, base row16). Number of O's total = 1+3+5 =9 matches count. Order kept: topmost flag becomes apex (single O). The colors kept order they flew: So the sequence of O's from top to bottom in input is placed left-to-right? Actually they are placed in rows left-to-right across each row? The apex O is the first O (topmost). Then next three O's (second to fourth) become row15 left to right? Let's verify order: Input O order top to bottom: rows2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13. That's 9 O's. Output row14 (apex) O corresponds to first O (row2). Row15 has three O's: likely correspond to next three O's (rows3,5,6) placed left to right. Row16 has five O's: correspond to remaining five O's (rows7,9,11,12,13) placed left to right. So order preserved left-to-right across rows, top to bottom across rows. Thus rule: take all non-blank cells (colored) that are aligned in a single column (maybe same x coordinate). Count them N. Determine smallest odd triangle height h such that total cells = h^2 (since triangle of odd width each row width = 1,3,5,..., (2h-1) sum = h^2). Indeed N = h^2. For N=9, h=3. ... [9450 chars truncated]
"Charged capacitors arrayed along a bus rail discharge and their energy pools into a wedge-shaped heat signature at the board's edge."
120b: fail
See: A dark circuit board with colored charge indicators lit at various points along a single vertical bus, unused board below.
Do: The capacitors discharge simultaneously; their energy migrates to the board's lower edge and manifests as a thermal wedge—hottest point at the peak, each band below wider, thermal colors matching the original charge indicators top-to-bottom.
Grid: The board dimensions are unchanged. All indicator positions go dark; only the thermal wedge glows at the bottom, centered on the bus rail.
We need to infer rule. From description: vertical bus column with colored indicators (O, etc). They disappear and produce a wedge at bottom centered on bus rail. The wedge expands upward: bottom row has single cell of original color? Actually in examples. Example1 input: grid 16x13? Let's count rows: Input lines 16 rows? Actually given 16 rows of 13 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13 columns. 16 rows. In input, there is a vertical column of O's at column 6 (0-index?). Many O's at various rows. Output: bottom rows show wedge: last row (row15) has O O O O O centered? Let's examine output rows bottom three rows: Row13 (0-index?) Actually output lines: after many empty rows, row13: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." (single O at column6). Row14: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." (three O's centered). Row15: ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." (five O's). So wedge of width 1,3,5 rows from bottom upward. The colors match original indicator color O. So rule: take the column where colored cells appear (the "bus") and collapse all colored cells to bottom, forming a centered triangle (isosceles) of odd widths increasing upward, with the same color as the original indicator (maybe multiple colors? In example2 there is only O as well). In example2 input: column 5? Actually O at column5 (0-index?). Output bottom rows: row14: ". . . . . O . . . . ." (single O). Row15: ". . . . O O O . . . ." (three O). So same. Now test input includes multiple colors: R, B, O at various rows. Possibly multiple vertical columns? Let's examine test input: grid appears 31 rows? Let's count lines: Provided many rows. Let's parse. Rows: 1: ". . R . . . . . O ." 2: ". . R . . . . . . ." 3: ". . . . . . . . . ." 4: ". . R . . . . . . ." 5: ". . R . . . . . . ." 6: ". . B . . . . . . ." 7: ". . B . . . . . . ." 8: ". . . . . . . . . ." 9: ". . B . . . . . . ." 10: ". . B . . . . . . ." 11: ". . . . . . . . . ." 12: ". . B . . . . . . ." 13: ". . . . . . . . O ." 14: ". . . . . . . . . ." 15: ". . . . . . . . . ." 16: ". . . . . . . . . ." 17: ". . . . . . . . . ." 18: ". . . . . . . . . ." 19: ". . . . . . . . . ." 20: ". . . . . . . . . ." 21: ". . . . . . . . O ." 22: ". . . . . . . . . ." 23: ". . . . . . . . . ." 24: ". . . . . . . . O ." 25: ". . . . . . . . . ." 26: ". . . . . . . . . ." 27: ". . . . . . . . . ." 28: ". . . . . . . . . ." 29: ". . . . . . . . . ." 30: ". . . . . . . . . ." 31: ". . . . . . . . . ." So 31 rows, 10 columns? Actually each row has 10 entries (including spaces). Yes 10 columns. We have colored cells at column 3? Let's index columns 1-10. Row1: column3 = R, column9 = O. Row2: column3=R. Row4: column3=R. Row5: column3=R. Row6-7: column3=B. Row9-10: column3=B. Row12: column3=B. Row13: column9=O. Row21: column9=O. Row24: column9=O. Thus there are two vertical columns: column3 has R and B mixed? Actually R and B appear at same column but different rows. Column9 has O at rows 1,13,21,24. The description says "single vertical bus". I ... [11326 chars truncated]
"Runes inscribed at intervals on a world-pillar detach and reassemble as a sacred cairn at the pillar's root."
120b: fail
See: A dark void bisected by a single pillar bearing colored runes at scattered heights, barren ground below.
Do: The runes peel from the pillar and drift downward, stacking into a cairn at the base—one rune crowns the peak, each tier below wider, their colors following the order they were carved from top to bottom of the pillar.
Grid: The void keeps its dimensions. The pillar is blank; only the cairn remains at the very bottom, centered on the pillar's axis.
We need to infer rule. From description: "dark void bisected by a single pillar bearing colored runes at scattered heights, barren ground below. The runes peel from the pillar and drift downward, stacking into a cairn at the base—one rune crowns the peak, each tier below wider, their colors following the order they were carved from top to bottom of the pillar. Grid details: The void keeps its dimensions. The pillar is blank; only the cairn remains at the very bottom, centered on the pillar's axis." Interpretation: Input grid has a vertical column (pillar) of colored cells (runes) at various rows, same column (maybe column index). They fall down to bottom, forming a pyramid (cairn) with the topmost rune at the apex, then next tier below wider (maybe 3 cells), then next tier 5 cells, etc. Colors follow order from top to bottom of pillar: topmost rune becomes top of cairn (single cell), next becomes second tier (3 cells) all same color? In examples, we need to verify. Example1 Input: many O's in column? Let's examine. Input grid size? appears 16 rows? Actually given 16 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 16 rows? Let's count: lines from Input: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." (12 columns). Then many lines with O at column 7? Let's index columns 0-11. O appears at column 6 (0-index). There are O's at rows: 2? Actually row2 (index1) has O, row3 also O, row5 O, row6 O, row7 O, row9 O, row11 O, row12 O, row13 O? Let's list: rows (starting 0): 0 all . 1 O at col6 2 O at col6 3 all . 4 O at col6 5 O at col6 6 O at col6 7 all . 8 O at col6 9 all . 10 O at col6 11 O at col6 12 O at col6 13 all . 14 all . 15 all . So there are many O's, not contiguous. The output shows a cairn at bottom rows 13-15? Output rows: bottom three rows have O's forming pyramid: row13 (index13) has O at col6 (single). row14 has O O O centered (col5-7). row15 has O O O O O (col4-8). That's a pyramid of height 3 (tiers 1,3,5). The colors follow order from top to bottom of pillar: need to see order of O's in pillar from topmost to bottommost. In input, topmost O at row1, then row2, row4,5,6,8,10,11,12. That's many O's. But output only uses O's (same color). So maybe rule: take the column of colored cells (any color) and compress them to bottom forming pyramid with same color as original column (since all same). The number of tiers equals number of distinct colors? Not. Example2 Input: column of O's at column5? Let's see: Input 16 rows, O at rows 0,3,6,9 maybe. Actually first line has O at col5 (0-index). Row3 O at col5, row6 O at col5, row9 O at col5. So four O's spaced. Output: bottom two rows have pyramid: row14 (index14) has O at col5 (single). row15 has O O O (col4-6). That's height 2 pyramid (tiers 1 and 3). So number of O's in column = 4, but pyramid uses only 2 tiers (total cells = 1+3=4). So they used all O's to fill pyramid: total O count = 4, pyramid of height h uses 1+3+5+...+(2h-1) = h^2 cells. So need h such that h^2 = number of runes. For 4 runes, h=2. For ... [5656 chars truncated]
"Dancers poised on separate platforms along a pole leap down and form a tiered tableau at the stage floor."
120b: fail
See: A dark stage with costumed dancers balanced at different heights along a single vertical pole, open floor below.
Do: Each dancer descends and joins a living tableau at the floor—the highest dancer stands alone on top, each tier below adds partners on both sides, costumes ordered as they were perched from top to bottom.
Grid: The stage dimensions remain. The pole stands empty; only the tableau sits at the bottom, centered beneath the pole.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x? Actually example 1 input appears 15 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13? Wait count: there are 13 entries per row? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13. So grid 15 rows? Actually there are 16 rows? Let's count lines: Input lines: from . . . . . . . . . . . . . (line1) then line2 with O etc, line3, line4, line5, line6, line7, line8, line9, line10, line11, line12, line13, line14, line15, line16. So 16 rows, 13 columns. Output also 16 rows, 13 columns. In output, O's moved to bottom forming a pyramid shape centered under column 6? Let's examine output: bottom rows (row16) ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." that's 5 O's centered. Row15: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." that's 3 O's. Row14: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." that's 1 O. So they formed a triangle/pyramid with apex at row14 column7? Actually column index 7 (1-indexed). Input had O's in a vertical line at column7 (since many rows have O at column7). Indeed input: many rows have O at column7 (the 7th column). So rule: take vertical line of O's (the "pole") and collapse them down to form a centered triangle at bottom, with height equal to number of O's? Let's count O's in input: rows with O at column7: rows2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13? Actually list: row2 O, row3 O, row5 O, row6 O, row7 O, row9 O, row11 O, row12 O, row13 O. That's 9 O's. Output triangle has rows14-16 with 1+3+5 =9 O's. Yes. So rule: take all cells of a particular color (maybe the most frequent non-black?) that are aligned vertically (forming a pole) and transform them into a centered pyramid at bottom, preserving count, with each row having odd number of that color, centered under original column. Now test input: grid appears 31 rows? Let's count lines: Provided many rows. Let's count: lines from ". . R . . . . . O ." (row1) to last ". . . . . . . . . ." (row31?). Let's count: I see rows numbered maybe 31. Let's count manually: 1 . . R . . . . . O . 2 . . R . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . R . . . . . . . 5 . . R . . . . . . . 6 . . B . . . . . . . 7 . . B . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . B . . . . . . . 10 . . B . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . 12 . . B . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . . . O . 14 . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . . 16 . . . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . 19 . . . . . . . . . . 20 . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . O . 22 . . . . . . . . . . 23 . . . . . . . . . . 24 . . . . . . . . O . 25 . . . . . . . . . . 26 . . . . . . . . . . 27 . . . . . . . . . . 28 . . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . . . . 30 . . . . . . . . . . 31 . . . . . . . . . . So 31 rows, 10 columns? Let's count columns: ". . R . . . . . O ." that's 10 entries. Yes 10 columns. We have two colors: R (red) and B (blue) and O (orange). They appear in vertical lines? Let's examine positions. R's at column3? Row1 col3 R, row2 col3 R, row4 col3 R, row5 col3 R. That's 4 R's at column3 (some rows missing). So vertical li ... [11734 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins exposed along a vertical fault line erode free and deposit into a delta fan at the basin floor."
120b: fail
See: A dark rock face with colored mineral bands exposed at irregular depths along a single fault, an empty basin below.
Do: Erosion frees the minerals and they wash downward, settling into a delta—the first mineral forms a narrow point, each stratum below fans wider, their colors matching the original vein order from shallowest to deepest, the widest deposit resting on the basin floor.
Grid: The cross-section keeps its dimensions. The fault line is blank; only the delta fan remains at the very bottom, centered on the fault.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x? Actually example 1 input appears 16 rows? Let's count: lines show 16 rows? Actually first example input: many rows, seems 16 rows? Output also 16 rows. Input shows a vertical line of O's (orange) at column 6? Let's index columns 0-? Input rows: first row all dots. second row has O at column 6 (0-index). Many rows have O at same column, but there are gaps (some rows have O, some not). Output shows a triangle fan at bottom: bottom row has O O O O O centered? Let's examine output bottom rows: row 13 (0-index?) shows O at column 6? Actually output rows: last three rows: row 13: . . . . . . O . . . . . . row 14: . . . . . O O O . . . . . row 15: . . . . O O O O O . . . . So a triangle of O's with apex at row13 column6, then width 3 at row14 columns5-7, then width5 at row15 columns4-8. So shape is a downward-pointing triangle (or fan) with apex at the original fault line (column where O's were). The original O's were a vertical line (a "fault") across many rows. The rule: take the vertical line of colored cells (maybe multiple colors) and collapse them into a triangle fan at bottom, preserving order of colors from top to bottom as layers? In example only one color O, so triangle of O. Now test input has multiple colors: R, B, O at various positions. Let's examine test input grid dimensions: appears 31 rows? Let's count lines: from ". . R . . . . . O ." as first row to last ". . . . . . . . . ." many rows. Let's count: I'll enumerate. 1 . . R . . . . . O . 2 . . R . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . R . . . . . . . 5 . . R . . . . . . . 6 . . B . . . . . . . 7 . . B . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . B . . . . . . . 10 . . B . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . 12 . . B . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . . . O . 14 . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . . 16 . . . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . 19 . . . . . . . . . . 20 . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . . . 22 . . . . . . . . O . 23 . . . . . . . . . . 24 . . . . . . . . . . 25 . . . . . . . . O . 26 . . . . . . . . . . 27 . . . . . . . . . . 28 . . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . . . . 30 . . . . . . . . . . 31 . . . . . . . . . . So 31 rows, 10 columns? Actually each row has 10 entries (including spaces). Yes 10 columns. We have vertical lines of R at column 2 (0-index?) Let's index columns 0-9. Row1: ". . R . . . . . O ." => column2 = R, column8 = O. Row2: column2 R. Row3 none. Row4 column2 R. Row5 column2 R. Row6 column2 B. Row7 column2 B. Row8 none. Row9 column2 B. Row10 column2 B. Row11 none. Row12 column2 B. Row13 column8 O. Row22 column8 O. Row25 column8 O. So there are three distinct vertical lines? Actually R line at column2 rows1,2,4,5. B line at column2 rows6,7,9,10,12. O line at column8 rows1,13,22,25. The description: "fault line is blank; only the delta fan remains at the very bottom, centered on the fault." So there is a single fault line (maybe the column where any colored cells ap ... [9047 chars truncated]
"Ingredients measured out along a skewer slide off and melt into a layered parfait at the bottom of the glass."
120b: fail
See: A tall, narrow glass with spoonfuls of colored batter clinging to a central skewer at various heights, empty glass below.
Do: The batter releases from the skewer, pools at the bottom, and sets into a parfait—each layer wider than the one above, colors stacking in the order they were threaded, the topmost dollop becoming the smallest cap of the dessert.
Grid: The glass keeps its shape. The skewer is bare; only the parfait remains, centered and resting on the bottom, its widest layer flush with the base.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x? Actually example 1 input appears 16 rows? Let's count: lines show 16 rows? Actually list: from ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." repeated many times. Count rows: I see 16 rows of input? Let's count: lines: 1-? Let's count quickly: there are 16 rows of input (maybe 16x13?). Output also 16 rows. Input has vertical line of O's at column 7 (0-index?). Many O's scattered. Output shows bottom rows forming a triangle of O's expanding upward: bottom row has O O O O O centered? Actually output bottom row: ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." That's 13 columns? Let's count columns: there are 13 columns. Bottom row has O's from col5 to col9 (5 O's). Row above has O O O at cols6-8? Actually second from bottom: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." (3 O's). Third from bottom: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." (single O). So shape is a pyramid of O's centered, with height 3? Actually there are 3 layers: single O, then 3 O, then 5 O. That's like expanding by 2 each level. This matches "parfait" stacking: the original O's were vertical line (spoonfuls) at various heights. They fall down and spread out forming layers, each layer wider than above, preserving order: topmost dollop becomes smallest cap (single O at top of parfait). So we need to take the vertical column of colored cells (maybe multiple colors) and collapse them into a pyramid at bottom, preserving order from top to bottom as layers from top to bottom? In example, input had O's at various rows (positions). Let's list input O rows: rows (0-index) maybe rows 1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,12? Actually many O's. Let's count: Input lines show O at column 7 (index 6) in rows: row1 (second line), row2 (third line), row4 (fifth line), row5 (sixth), row6 (seventh), row8 (ninth), row10 (eleventh), row11 (twelfth), row12 (thirteenth). That's 9 O's. Output pyramid has 1+3+5 =9 O's. So number of O's determines size of pyramid: need to arrange them in layers of odd counts: 1,3,5,... until sum equals total count. So we need to create a centered pyramid at bottom of grid, with base flush with bottom row. The pyramid is built upward: bottom layer width = largest odd number <= total count? Actually sum of first k odd numbers = k^2. So if total count = n, we need k = sqrt(n) if n is perfect square. Here n=9 => k=3 layers, bottom width = 2k-1 =5. Works. Thus rule: take all cells of a particular color (maybe the most frequent? Or the color that appears in a vertical line?) In example only O present. In test input there are multiple colors: R, B, O. Possibly each color forms its own vertical line? Let's examine test input: grid 31 rows? Actually many rows. Let's parse: each line has 10 columns? The first line: ". . R . . . . . O ." that's 10 columns. So grid 31 rows x10 columns. There are vertical lines of R at column 3? Actually column indices: 0 1 2 3? Let's map: positions: . . R . . . . . O . => R at col2, O at col8. Next line: ". . R . . . . . . ." => R at col2. Many rows have R vertical line at ... [10085 chars truncated]
"Staccato notes hung high on a staff collapse into a resonant chord that swells at the finale."
120b: k=2
See: A silent score with isolated notes pinned along a vertical staff line, rests between them, and empty measures trailing below.
Do: The notes release from their suspended positions and cascade to the closing bars, each successive bar gaining more voices, building from a single tone at top to a full harmonic spread at the bottom—preserving the original timbral ordering.
Grid: The score's length is unchanged. All prior note positions become rests; the crescendo chord occupies the final measures, centered on the original staff line.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with many rows, columns? Example1 input size: looks 16 rows? Actually count lines: Input lines list 16 rows? Let's count: Provided lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . So 16 rows, 13 columns. Output also 16 rows, 13 columns. Output shows bottom rows have O's forming triangle shape: rows 14-16? Actually output rows 14-16 have O's. Let's examine output rows: 1-13 all dots. Row14: . . . . . . O . . . . . . Row15: . . . . . O O O . . . . . Row16: . . . . O O O O O . . . . So pattern: original O's were scattered vertically along column 7 (0-index maybe 6) at many rows (2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13). They become a triangle at bottom rows, centered on same column (col7). The number of O's originally? Count: rows with O: 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13 = 9 O's. Output triangle uses rows 14-16: row14 has 1 O, row15 has 3 O, row16 has 5 O = total 9 O's. So they are arranged as a centered pyramid with increasing odd counts per row, bottom row width = number of O's? Actually bottom row width = 5, which is 2* (row index from bottom?) Let's think: For n O's, we create a triangle of height h where total O = h^2 (since sum of odd numbers 1+3+...+(2h-1)=h^2). Here total O =9 => h=3. So triangle height 3 rows, bottom width 2h-1=5. Yes. They are placed at bottom of grid, aligned such that the central column matches original column of O's (col7). So they "cascade" down. Now Example2: Input size? 16 rows, 10 columns? Let's count columns: line ". . . . . O . . . . ." that's 11? Actually there are spaces between. Let's count tokens: . . . . . O . . . . . => 11 tokens. So 11 columns, 16 rows. Input O's at rows: 1 (row1 col6), 4 (row4 col6), 7 (row7 col6), 10 (row10 col6). That's 4 O's. Output: bottom rows rows 15-16? Output rows 15: . . . . . O . . . . . (single O) row16: . . . . O O O . . . . (3 O). That's total 4 O's, triangle height h=2 (since 1+3=4). Bottom row width 3, centered on column 6? Let's see bottom row: O O O at columns 5,6,7? Actually row16: . . . . O O O . . . . => O at col5,6,7 (1-index). Center column is col6 which matches original column of O's. Good. Thus rule: Gather all cells of a particular color (maybe O) that are "notes" (non-black) and move them to bottom forming a centered triangle (or pyramid) with odd widths, preserving original column as center. All other cells become dots (black). The "notes release from their suspended positions and cascade to the closing bars, each successive bar gaining more voices, building from a single tone at top to a full harmonic spread at the bott ... [8905 chars truncated]
"Climbers roped at intervals along a cliff face rappel down and form a human pyramid on the ground."
120b: k=3
See: A sheer rock wall with athletes clipped in at scattered heights along a single vertical route, open ground below.
Do: Each climber descends and takes a position in a pyramid at the base of the wall—the highest climber stands alone on top, and each row below adds shoulders, preserving the jersey colors in the order they were roped.
Grid: The wall's dimensions stay the same. Every hold is now empty; only the pyramid stands on the bottom ledge, centered beneath the route line.
We need to infer rule. From description: "sheer rock wall with athletes clipped in at scattered heights along a single vertical route, open ground below. Each climber descends and takes a position in a pyramid at the base of the wall—the highest climber stands alone on top, and each row below adds shoulders, preserving the jersey colors in the order they were roped."
Interpretation: Input grid has colored cells (non-.) representing climbers at various rows along a single column (the route). They are at various heights (rows). They descend to bottom and form a pyramid (triangular arrangement) centered under the column. The order of colors is preserved as they were roped (maybe topmost first?).
Essentially we take the sequence of colored cells encountered from top to bottom along the column (maybe leftmost column? Actually column where they are placed). In examples, we need to see.
Example1 input: grid 16 rows? Actually 16 rows, 13 columns? Let's count: Input lines show 13 columns. The O's are in column 7 (0-index?). Let's examine: Row1 all .; Row2 has O at column7 (index 6). Row3 O same column. Row4 none. Row5 O etc. So there are many O's scattered at various rows, all in same column. Output: bottom rows have pyramid of O's: last row (row16) has O O O O O (5 O's) centered at column? Let's see output rows: row14 (index13) has O at column7 (single). Row15 (index14) has O O O (3) centered. Row16 (index15) has O O O O O (5). So pyramid of height 3 (levels 1,2,3) with base width 5. The number of O's in input? Count O's: Let's count rows with O: rows2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13? Actually list: row2 O, row3 O, row5 O, row6 O, row7 O, row9 O, row11 O, row12 O, row13 O. That's 9 O's. Pyramid of height 3 uses 1+3+5=9 cells. So they used all O's to fill pyramid, preserving order: topmost O becomes top of pyramid (single), then next three O's become second row left to right, then next five O's become bottom row left to right. The order is top-to-bottom in input.
Thus rule: Take column where colored cells appear (maybe there could be multiple columns? but seems single column). Collect all non-.-colored cells in that column, in order from top to bottom. Then create a centered pyramid at bottom of grid (lowest rows) using those colors, preserving order left-to-right across each row, top row first.
The pyramid shape: For n total items, find smallest odd k such that sum_{i=1}^{m} (2i-1) = m^2 >= n? Actually pyramid rows have odd widths: 1,3,5,... So total items needed for m rows = m^2. So number of items must be a perfect square? In examples, 9 items -> m=3 rows. Example2: Input has O's count? Let's count: rows1 O at col6? Actually row1 has O at column6? Input row1: ". . . . . O . . . . ." that's column6 (index5). Row4 O, row7 O, row10 O. That's 4 O's. Output pyramid: bottom rows: row15 (index14) has O at column5? Actually output row15: ". . . . O O O . . .". That's three O's. Row16: ". . . . . O . . . .". That's single O at column6? Wait orientation reve
... [8399 chars truncated]
"Raindrops suspended in a column of air finally fall and accumulate into a snowdrift at the surface."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky with droplets of color frozen at various altitudes along a single vertical updraft, clear air beneath.
Do: The updraft dies and the droplets precipitate, each one layering into a drift that grows wider toward the ground—the highest drops settle on top, the lowest spread the widest, their hues preserved in falling order.
Grid: The sky remains the same size. All former droplet positions clear to darkness; the drift sits at the very bottom, centered under the updraft column.
We need to understand transformation. From description: dark sky with droplets of color frozen at various altitudes along a single vertical updraft, clear air beneath. Updraft dies and droplets precipitate, each one layering into a drift that grows wider toward the ground—the highest drops settle on top, the lowest spread the widest, their hues preserved in falling order. Grid details: sky remains same size. All former droplet positions clear to darkness; the drift sits at the very bottom, centered under the updraft column.
Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells (non-.) aligned in a single column (the updraft). They may be at various rows. They represent droplets at different altitudes. Output: we clear those cells (set to .) and create a "drift" at bottom rows, centered under that column, forming a pyramid shape (like triangle) with rows increasing width as go down. The colors are placed in order from top of pyramid (smallest width) to bottom (largest width), preserving the order of droplets from highest to lowest (i.e., topmost droplet becomes topmost row of pyramid). The colors of each droplet maybe fill the entire row? In example 1, input had many O's in column 6 (0-index?). Let's examine.
Example 1 input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 16 rows? Actually list: lines from . . . . . . . . . . . . . (first line) then many lines. Let's count: I see 16 rows? Let's count: lines: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 2: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 3: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 5: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 6: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 7: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 8: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 9: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 10: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 11: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 12: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 13: . . . . . . O . . . . . . ; 14: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 15: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; 16: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (maybe 16 rows). Output grid also 16 rows. Output shows bottom three rows have O's forming triangle: row 14 (0-index?) has O at column 6 (single). Row 15 has O O O centered (columns 5-7). Row 16 has O O O O O (columns 4-8). Indeed triangle of width 1,3,5.
Input had many O's in column 6 (0-index maybe 5). Count of O's? Let's count O positions: rows 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13 = 9 O's. Output triangle uses 1+3+5 = 9 O's. So number of droplets equals total cells in triangle (odd numbers sum). The triangle is built with rows of odd widths increasing by 2 each row, centered on column of updraft. The number of rows of triangle = smallest k such that sum_{i=0}^{k-1} (2i+1) = k^2 >= number of droplets. Actually sum of first k odd numbers = k^2. So if n droplets, k = ceil(sqrt(n)). Then we fill triangle of k rows, using exactly k^2 cells, but if n is not a perfect square, maybe some extra cells? In example n=9, sqrt=3, k=3, triangle rows 3, total cells 9 exactly.
Now colors: all O same, so fine.
Now test input: grid size appears 31 rows? Let's count lines: Provided m
... [7443 chars truncated]
"Bricks stored on different scaffold platforms are lowered and mortared into a ziggurat at street level."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A construction site with colored bricks sitting on scaffold tiers along a single vertical column, unbuilt ground below.
Do: The scaffold is dismantled and each brick is set into a ziggurat rising from the street—narrowest course on top, each course below one brick wider on each side, colors laid in the order they were shelved.
Grid: The site footprint is unchanged. The scaffold vanishes; only the ziggurat remains, its base flush with the bottom edge, centered on the column.
"Scouts posted at watchtowers along a frontier withdraw and form ranked battle lines at the border's edge."
120b: fail
See: A dark frontier with sentinels stationed at irregular intervals along a single lookout column, open marshaling ground below.
Do: The sentinels abandon their posts and assemble into formation at the border—the highest-ranked officer stands alone at the front, each successive rank wider, their banner colors matching the order of their original postings from top to bottom.
Grid: The frontier map keeps its dimensions. All towers go dark; the formation sits at the very bottom, centered on the lookout column.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid with many rows, columns? Example 1 input appears 12 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13? Actually there are 13 entries per row? Let's count: there are 13 '.' maybe. Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13. So grid 17 rows? Actually example input has many rows: list shows 17 rows? Let's count lines: from Input: lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row1) 2 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row2) 3 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row3) 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row4) 5 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row5) 6 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row6) 7 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row7) 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row8) 9 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row9) 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row10) 11 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row11) 12 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row12) 13 . . . . . . O . . . . . . (row13) 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row14) 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row15) 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (row16) So 16 rows, 13 columns. Output grid same dimensions 16x13. Output shows bottom rows have O's forming a pyramid shape centered on column where original O's were (the "lookout column"). In input, O's are at column index? Let's index columns 0-12. In rows with O, they appear at column 6? Let's check row2: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." So column 6 (0-index). So the sentinel column is column 6 (the 7th column). There are many O's at various rows (irregular intervals). The rule: take all O's (sentinels) and move them to bottom, forming a pyramid: highest-ranked officer stands alone at front (top of pyramid), each successive rank wider, colors matching order of original postings from top to bottom. In example, all O's same color, so pyramid of O's with rows increasing width: bottom row width 5? Let's see output bottom rows: Row14 (index13?) Actually output rows: last three rows show O's. Let's list output rows from bottom up: Row16 (last): ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." (all .) Wait bottom row maybe row16? Actually output shows bottom rows with O's at rows 14-16? Let's examine output lines: Output: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . O . . . . . . 15 . . . . . O O O . . . . . 16 . . . . O O O O O . . . . So bottom three rows have O's forming pyramid: row14 (third from bottom) has single O at column6; row15 has three O's centered at column5-7; row16 has five O's centered at column4-8. So width increases by 2 each row downwards. This matches number of O's originally? Count original O's: In input there are many O's: rows 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13,? Actually many O's. Let's count: rows with O: 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13. That's 9 O's. Pyramid of 1+3+5 =9. So they arranged O' ... [8640 chars truncated]
"Spotlights hung at different heights on a fly tower descend and fan into a footlight array at the stage floor."
120b: fail
See: A dark proscenium with colored lanterns rigged at various battens along one fly line, empty stage below.
Do: The lanterns are flown down and re-hung as footlights—the top lantern becomes a single point, each row below it spreading wider, their gel colors kept in the original rigging order, all mounted flush against the stage floor.
Grid: The proscenium dimensions are unchanged. The fly line goes dark; only the footlight fan remains at the bottom, centered under the original line.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grid has vertical line of O's (orange) at column 6? Let's examine Example1 input size 16x13? Actually lines: first example input shows 16 rows? Let's count: lines from Input: there are 16 rows? Actually list: rows: 1 ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." (13 columns) then many rows. Output also 16 rows. In input, there is a column of O's at column 7 (0-index?). In output, the O's form a triangle at bottom left? Let's see output rows bottom three rows have O's forming pyramid: row14 (0-index?) has O at col6? Actually output bottom rows: row14 (index 13) ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." (single O). Row15: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." (three O). Row16: ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." (five O). So pattern: a triangle with apex at original column? The original column of O's is column 6 (0-index?) Let's index columns 0-12. Input O column appears at column 6 (since there are 5 dots then O). Output triangle apex at row13 (second from bottom) column6? Actually row13 (index 13) has O at column6 (same column). Then next row down (row14) has O at columns5,6,7 (centered). Next row (row15) has O at columns4-8 (5 O). So triangle expands downward, each row adds one O to each side. Thus rule: take vertical line of colored cells (same color) located somewhere, collapse to a single point at top of that line? Wait description: "lanterns are flown down and re-hung as footlights—the top lantern becomes a single point, each row below it spreading wider". So original vertical line of lanterns (color) becomes a triangle (pyramid) anchored at original top position (the highest lantern) becomes apex, then expands downward. In example1, the vertical line of O's extends many rows (positions). The topmost O is at row2? Actually input rows: row2 (index1) has O at col6, row3 also O, row5 etc many O's. The topmost O is at row2 (index1). In output, the apex O appears at row14 (index13) not at top. Wait output apex is near bottom, not top. Hmm maybe they flip orientation: The "fly line" is top, footlights at bottom. So they take the vertical line and move it to bottom, preserving order? The top lantern becomes a single point (apex) at bottom row? Actually bottom rows have triangle. The apex is at row14 (third from bottom). The original line length maybe 9 O's? Let's count O's in input: rows with O: row2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13? Actually list: rows: 2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13? That's 9 O's. Output triangle has 1+3+5 =9 O's. So they rearranged the O's into a triangle at bottom, preserving count. The apex row is placed such that triangle fits within grid bottom, anchored at same column as original line. The triangle height = number of rows needed to accommodate count as odd numbers? For n O's, they form rows of 1,3,5,... until sum = n. That's like k rows where sum of first k odd numbers = k^2 = n => k = sqrt(n). For n=9, k=3 rows. Indeed triangle of height 3 rows. So they create a centered triangle of width (2k-1) at bottom, with apex at column of original li ... [10154 chars truncated]
"Buds clinging to a bare stem drop their petals, which settle into a mulch mound at the soil line."
120b: k=1
See: A dark garden bed with colored buds dotting a single upright stem at uneven intervals, bare earth below.
Do: Each bud sheds its color downward; the petals gather at the soil into a neat mound—one petal at the peak, each layer below wider, hues layered in the order the buds appeared from tip to root.
Grid: The bed stays the same size. The stem is bare; only the mound remains, sitting on the bottom row, centered on the stem's position.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x12? Actually example 1 input size: looks 12 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13? Wait count: there are 13 entries per row? Let's count: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." that's 13 columns. Number of rows: many lines, maybe 16? Output also 16 rows, 13 columns. So grid size stays same. In example, there is a vertical line of O's (orange) at column 7 (0-index?). Input shows O's at various rows: rows 2,3? Actually list: row1 (index0) all .; row2 has O at col6; row3 same; row4 all .; row5 O; row6 O; row7 O; row8 all .; row9 O; row10 all .; row11 O; row12 O; row13 O; rows14-16 all . . So there is a single column with O's at many rows, not contiguous, with gaps. Output: bottom rows have a pyramid of O's centered at same column. Specifically bottom row (last row) has O O O O O (5) centered? Let's see output last row: ". . . . O O O O O . . . ." That's 5 O's from col4 to col8 (0-index). Next row up: ". . . . . O O O . . . . ." that's 3 O's from col5-7. Next row up: ". . . . . . O . . . . . ." that's single O at col6. So pyramid of height 3 (levels) with widths 1,3,5. The column matches original column of O's (col6). The pyramid sits at bottom rows (rows 13-15? Actually output rows 13-15 have O's). The rest cleared. Thus rule: For a given column (stem) that contains colored buds (non-black) at various rows, we take the sequence of colors as they appear from top to bottom? In example only one color O, so pyramid of O's. But description: "Each bud sheds its color downward; the petals gather at the soil into a neat mound—one petal at the peak, each layer below wider, hues layered in the order the buds appeared from tip to root." So multiple colors: each bud (colored cell) drops down, forming layers of pyramid, with topmost layer (single cell) being color of topmost bud, next layer (3 cells) color of next bud, etc. So we need to collect colors in order from topmost bud to bottommost bud along the column, ignoring gaps. Then construct a centered pyramid at bottom rows, with each layer height 1 row, width = 2*layer_index-1 (starting 1). The bottommost layer corresponds to the lowest bud? Actually description says "hues layered in the order the buds appeared from tip to root." Tip is top, root is bottom. So topmost bud color at top of mound (single cell), then next colors below, etc. So pyramid layers from top to bottom follow same order as original top-to-bottom. Thus for test input, we need to identify the column (stem) where colored cells appear. There may be multiple colors: R, B, O etc. Let's parse test input. Grid size: appears 31 rows? Let's count lines: Provided many rows. Let's enumerate rows with index. I'll copy lines: 1: . . R . . . . . O . 2: . . R . . . . . . . 3: . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . R . . . . . . . 5: . . R . . . . . . . 6: . . B . . . . . . . 7: . . B . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . B . . . . . . . 10: . . B . . . . . . . 11: . . . . . . . . . . 12 ... [10536 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black background containing several colored line segments (horizontal or vertical). Each segment is a contiguous run of a single non-black color, either all in one row or all in one column. The segments vary in length — some are just a single cell, others span multiple cells. No two segments share the same color.
Do: 1. Identify all distinct colored line segments in the input grid. For each segment, record its color and its length (number of cells). 2. Sort the segments by length in descending order (longest first). 3. The longest segment has length L. Create an L×L output grid. 4. Fill the output grid in layers from outside to inside: the longest segment's color fills the entire grid as the outermost border ring. The second-longest segment's color fills the next inner rectangle (inset by 1 on all sides). Continue for each subsequent segment, each forming the next inner ring, inset by 1 additional cell on each side from the previous. 5. The shortest segment (which may be a single cell) fills the center of the grid. If a segment has length 1, it fills only the single center cell (for odd-sized grids) or a 2×2 center block is not needed — each layer's thickness is exactly 1 cell on each side.
Grid: The output grid is a square with side length equal to the length of the longest segment found in the input. It contains concentric rectangular rings of color, one ring per segment, with no black background remaining. The outermost ring is 1 cell thick on each side, as is each subsequent inner ring.
"Russian nesting dolls carved from colored sticks"
120b: k=1
See: Scattered across a vast dark field lie colored sticks of different lengths — each a single pure color, each lying perfectly straight, no two alike. They look abandoned, but each one remembers its size.
Do: The longest stick claims authority and bends itself into a square frame — the outermost shell of a nesting doll. The next longest stick, humbled, curls inside that frame to form a smaller shell within. Each remaining stick, from longest to shortest, takes its turn nestling inside the one before it, like matryoshka dolls stacking inward. The tiniest stick — perhaps just a splinter — finds itself cradled at the very heart.
Grid: The result is a perfect square portrait of nested shells, each exactly one layer thick, with the mightiest stick's color as the outer skin and the smallest stick's color glowing at the core. No darkness remains — every inch is claimed by a shell.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid has colored sticks (lines) of single colors, each straight line (vertical/horizontal?) In example1 input: we see B vertical line? Let's examine: grid 21x21? Input shows B column at column? Let's map coordinates: rows 0-20. B appears at column 13? Actually line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." many rows. At row2: "... B ..." at column? Count: there are 13 dots then B then rest. So B at column 13 (0-index). Also G vertical line at column 4? rows 3-6 have G at column4. M vertical line at column8? rows8-9 have M at column8. So three sticks: B longest? length? B appears from row2 to row7? Actually B appears rows2-7 (6 rows). G appears rows3-6 (4 rows). M appears rows8-9 (2 rows). So lengths: B=6, G=4, M=2. Output is a 6x6 square with nested layers: outermost B, then G, then M at center 2x2. So rule: take sticks lengths, sort descending, create square of size equal to longest length? Actually longest length =6 => output 6x6. Outer border color = longest stick's color (B). Next inner border (one cell thick) = second longest (G). Next inner border = third (M). Since lengths are even? The innermost region size = length of shortest? For lengths 2 => inner 2x2 region of M. Works. Thus transformation: Identify each colored line (stick) in input: they are straight lines (vertical or horizontal?) In example they are vertical. Could be any orientation but likely vertical/horizontal. Determine length (number of cells). Sort descending. Create a square of size equal to longest length. Fill layers from outermost to innermost with colors according to descending lengths. If there are more sticks than can fit? Probably each layer thickness is 1 cell. The innermost region will be size = length of shortest stick (maybe also 1 cell if odd?). For odd lengths, inner region may be 1x1. Now test input: Need to find sticks. Let's parse grid: size? appears 22 columns? Let's count: first row has 22 entries? ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 22. rows 0-20? Actually there are 22 rows? Let's count lines: Provided 22 rows (0-21). Let's index. I'll list rows with coordinates. Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: all . Row4: ". . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." => G at column6? Count: columns 0-5 are ., column6 is G, rest . So G vertical line length? Let's see further rows. Row5: all . Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . ." => O at column10? Actually count: columns0-9 ., column10 O, rest . Row7: same O at column10. Row8: same O at column10. Row9: all . Row10: all . Row11: ". . M M M M M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." => M from column2 to column6 (5 cells) horizontally? Actually row11 has M M M M M (5) starting at col2? Let's count: col0 ., col1 ., col2 M, col3 M, col4 M, col5 M, col6 M, col7 ., rest . Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . ." => A at column10? Wait column10? Count: col0-9 ., col10 A, rest . Rows13-18: similar A vertic ... [2434 chars truncated]
"Cell membranes forming around organelles by size"
120b: fail
See: Scattered protein filaments of different colors float in cytoplasm. Each filament is a single color and varies in length — some are long structural proteins, others are tiny enzymatic fragments.
Do: The cell organizes itself: the longest filament becomes the outermost cell membrane, wrapping around everything. The next longest forms a membrane just inside, and so on, each enclosing the smaller ones. The tiniest fragment becomes the nucleus at the very center. Each membrane is exactly one layer thick.
Grid: A square cell whose side length matches the longest filament, filled with concentric membrane layers — no cytoplasm remains, only nested living envelopes.
We need to infer rule: From examples, we have input with scattered colored cells (filaments). Output is a square of size equal to longest filament length (i.e., the maximum count of contiguous cells of same color in a line? Actually "filament" is a line of same color maybe contiguous orthogonal? In example1: Input shows B vertical line of length? Let's examine. Example1 input grid size 21x21? Actually many rows. There are B column at column? Let's map: row indices 0-20. B appears at column 13? Let's count: row2 (index2) has B at column13 (0-index?). Row3 also B at column13. Row4-6 also B at column13. So B vertical line of length 5? Actually rows 2-7 have B? Row2-7 inclusive: rows 2,3,4,5,6,7 have B at column13. That's 6 cells. Also there is M vertical line at column8 rows8-9? Actually rows8-9 have M at column8. That's length 2. G vertical line at column4 rows3-6? Actually rows3-6 have G at column4. That's length 4. So longest filament is B length 6. Output is 6x6 square with outer layer B, inner G, innermost M (2x2). Indeed output shows B border, then G interior, then M 2x2 center. So rule: Identify each color filament (connected line) length (number of cells). Sort by length descending. Build concentric squares with each color as layer, outermost being longest filament, next longest inner, etc. The smallest filament becomes center (single cell? but in example1 smallest is M length2, but center is 2x2 block, not single cell. Wait center is M block of size 2x2 because there are two M cells originally? Actually M length 2 vertical line. In output, M occupies a 2x2 square. So the size of each layer corresponds to the count of cells of that color? Let's see: B length6 -> outer border of 6x6 square has perimeter cells count? For a 6x6 square, border cells count = 6*4 -4 =20. That's not 6. So not matching count. Maybe each filament length determines side length of square: longest length = side length of final square. Next longest determines side length of inner square? In example1, longest length =6 => outer square side 6. Next longest G length=4 => inner square side =? In output inner G region is a 4x4 square (since border B occupies outermost ring, leaving 4x4 interior). Indeed output shows B border, then G interior of size 4x4 (including M inside). So G side length =4 matches its filament length. Next M length=2 => innermost square side =2, matches M block 2x2. So rule: For each color, the number of cells in its filament equals side length of square region for that color in final nested squares. Thus we need to find distinct colors (excluding .) each appears as a straight line (filament) of length N. Then produce output square of size equal to max N, with layers of colors in descending order of N (largest outermost). Each layer is a solid square of side length equal to its N, centered. If there are more than 3 colors, we nest accordingly. Check Example2: Input has R line length? Let's count: row4 (index4) has R R R R R R R? Actually ... [6974 chars truncated]
"Planetary rings sorted by the arc length of each debris field"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored debris streams orbit through empty black space. Each stream is a single color — some stretch across many sectors, others are just brief flashes. No two share a color.
Do: Gravity collapses them into a planetary cross-section: the longest debris arc becomes the outermost ring. Each successively shorter arc forms the next inner ring, compressing inward until the shortest fragment becomes the planetary core.
Grid: A square cross-section of a ringed planet — concentric colored bands from longest arc outside to shortest at the center, with no void remaining.
"Colored current bands pulled into a whirlpool by their reach"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored ocean currents of different lengths flow across a dark sea. Each current is a distinct color — some stretch across many leagues, others are just brief eddies. They drift in various directions.
Do: A maelstrom draws them in: the longest current wraps the outer rim of the whirlpool. The next longest spirals just inside. Each shorter current tightens into the next inner ring until the briefest eddy sits motionless at the whirlpool's heart.
Grid: A square cross-section of the whirlpool — concentric colored rings, each one layer thick, longest current on the outside, shortest at the still center.
"Colored wire traces sheathed into a cable by gauge length"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored wire traces of different lengths lie scattered across a dark circuit board. Each trace is a single color and runs in one direction — some are long bus lines, others short jumpers.
Do: The engineer bundles them into a shielded cable: the longest trace wraps the outermost sheath. The next longest becomes the next inner insulation layer. Each shorter trace nests inside the previous until the shortest forms the core conductor at the center.
Grid: A square cable cross-section with concentric colored insulation rings, longest trace as outer jacket, shortest as the central conductor.
"Colored serpents coil around each other by their body length"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Mythic serpents of different colors lie stretched across the void. Each serpent is a single brilliant hue — some are great wyrms spanning vast distances, others are small garden snakes. None share a color.
Do: They coil into a nest: the longest serpent wraps the outermost coil of the square nest. The next longest coils just inside. Each shorter serpent takes the next inner ring until the smallest curls into a knot at the very center.
Grid: A square serpent's nest — concentric colored coils, each one body thick, greatest wyrm on the outside, smallest snake at the center.
"Colored ribbon dancers forming concentric squares by ribbon length"
120b: k=1
See: Dancers with colored ribbons of different lengths are scattered across a dark stage. Each dancer trails a ribbon of a unique color — some ribbons flow long and sweeping, others are short scarves.
Do: The choreographer calls them to form: the dancer with the longest ribbon traces the outermost square path. The next longest ribbon traces a square just inside. Each shorter ribbon dances a tighter square within the last until the shortest ribbon twirls only at the center.
Grid: A square formation viewed from above — concentric colored ribbon paths, each one step wide, longest ribbon on the outside, shortest at the center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with scattered colored cells: B column vertical line? Let's examine example1 input: many rows 21x? Actually 21 columns? Output is 6x6 pattern: a square with outer border B, inner region G, center 2x2 M. So rule: find longest ribbon (most frequent? longest line?) and create concentric squares based on lengths of ribbons present in input. In input, we have B vertical line of length? Let's see coordinates: B appears at column? rows 2-7? Actually lines: row2 (0-index?) Let's map: Input rows 0-20. B appears at column 13? Let's count: row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B at column 13 (0-index). Row3: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B same column 13. Row4-6 also B same column. Row7: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B column 13 rows 2-7 (6 rows). That's longest vertical line length 6. G appears at column 4 rows 3-6 (4 rows). M appears at column 8 rows 8-9 (2 rows). So lengths: B length6, G length4, M length2. Output forms concentric squares with side lengths corresponding to lengths? Outer square size 6? Output is 6x6 with border B (size6). Inside G region size4 (since border removed). Inside M region size2. So rule: take each colored line (vertical) of distinct color, length determines size of square. Place squares centered? In output, squares are centered same as original lines? The input lines are vertical, but output squares are full squares. So we need to map lengths to square sizes, and colors correspond to those lines. Thus algorithm: Identify colored cells that form straight lines (ribbons) of same color, each line length distinct. Sort by length descending. Create output grid of size equal to longest length (Lmax). Fill with outermost color border of thickness 1? Actually outermost square is Lmax x Lmax, filled entirely with outermost color? In example, outermost border is B, interior is other colors. The outermost square is filled with B on border, interior not B. So we need to create concentric squares each one cell thick, colors correspond to lengths descending. Thus for test input, we need to find colored lines and lengths. Let's parse test input grid (size?). Provided 21 rows? Let's count rows: lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (row0) to last row row20. So 21 rows, 23 columns? Let's count columns: first row has 23 entries? Let's count: there are 23 '.'? Let's quickly count: pattern ". " repeated 23? Hard. But we just need lengths of colored lines. Identify colors present: G, O, M, A. Also maybe others? Let's locate. Rows: 0-3 all dots. Row4: ". . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at column? Let's index columns 0-? Count: positions: 0 '.';1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 'G'; So column6. Only one G? Row5 all dots. Rows6-8 have O vertical line: Row6: "... O ..." at column? Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . ." So O at column10? Let's count: columns 0-9 '.' then column10 'O ... [3171 chars truncated]
"Colored mineral veins compressed into strata by their extent"
120b: k=2
See: Colored mineral veins of varying lengths are exposed in dark bedrock. Each vein is a single vivid mineral — some run deep and long through the earth, others are short crystalline pockets.
Do: Tectonic pressure compresses them into a square geode: the longest vein becomes the outermost mineral layer. The next longest crystallizes just inside. Each shorter vein forms the next inner stratum until the smallest crystal sits at the geode's core.
Grid: A square geode cross-section with concentric colored mineral strata, each one layer thick, longest vein on the outside, rarest crystal at the center.
We need to infer rule: From examples, input contains colored cells scattered; output is a square with concentric layers of colors based on lengths of "veins". Essentially we need to find each distinct color's connected component (maybe line) length? In example1: Input has B vertical line of length? Let's examine. Input grid size 21x21? Actually example1 input shows many rows, with B column at column? Let's parse: there is a vertical line of B from row 2? Actually rows start index 0. B appears at column 13? Let's count: row2 (0-index) has B at column 13 (since . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . .). Row3 also B at column 13, row4-6 also B. So B vertical line length 5? rows 2-6 inclusive =5 cells. Also G vertical line at column 4 rows 3-6? Actually rows 3-6 have G at column 4. So G length 4. M appears as two cells at row8-9 column? row8 has M at column 9? Actually row8: ". . . . . . . . M . . . . . . . . . . . . .". So M at column 8 (0-index). Row9 same. So M length 2. So we have three colors with lengths: B=5, G=4, M=2. Output is a 6x6 square with layers: outermost B, then G, then M at center 2x2. Indeed output shows B border, G inner border, M 2x2 center. So rule: take each colored component (maybe line) length, sort descending, create concentric square layers each one cell thick, using colors in order of decreasing length, with smallest component at center (if multiple cells maybe fill square of appropriate size). The size of output square = 2*max_len? Let's see: max length 5 gave outer layer thickness? Output size 6. For length 5, outer layer thickness? Actually outer layer is B border of width 1. The side length of square = 2* (number of distinct colors) + something? Not exactly. Let's compute: number of colors =3. Output size = 2*3 =6. Indeed 6x6. Example2: Input has R line length? Input shows a horizontal line of R of length 5? Actually row4 has "R R R R R R R R" eight? Let's count: row4: ". . . R R R R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". That's 8 Rs? Actually there are 8 Rs contiguous. So length 8. G line length? Row12 has "G G G G" length 4. A single cell? Actually A appears at row9 column? row9 has A at column 15? Actually row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . .". So A single cell. So lengths: R=8, G=4, A=1. Output size = 5x5. Number of colors =3, but output size 5 not 6. Hmm maybe size = max length? For example1 max length 5 gave output size 6 (max+1). Example2 max length 8 gave output size 5 (not). So not. Maybe output square side length = (max length of any component) - (min length) + 1? Not. Let's examine output2: 5x5 with layers: outer R border, inner G border, center A. So three layers. So side length = 2*layers -? For 3 layers, side length = 2*3 -1 =5. Indeed for n layers, side length = 2n-1. Example1 had 3 layers, side length should be 5, but output is 6. Wait output1 is 6x6, not 5x5. Let's recount layers: colors B, G, M. That's 3 layers. 2*3-1 =5. But output is 6. So maybe there is al ... [6890 chars truncated]
"Layered sushi built from ingredient strips"
120b: fig alone solves
See: On a black cutting board lie several strips of colored ingredients — some long nori sheets, some shorter fish slices, a tiny dab of wasabi. Each ingredient is a different color and a different length.
Do: The chef builds a square pressed sushi block: the longest strip wraps the outermost layer. The next longest wraps just inside that, forming the next ring. Each ingredient becomes one layer of the cross-section, nesting inward by size until the smallest morsel sits at the heart.
Grid: A perfect square cross-section of layered sushi, each ring one ingredient thick, largest on the outside, smallest at the center.
"Notes ranked by duration composing a resonance mandala"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Scattered across silence are colored tones — each a sustained note of a single pitch. Some ring out for many beats, others are brief staccato pops. No two share the same timbre.
Do: The conductor arranges them into a chord diagram: the longest-ringing tone becomes the outermost resonance frame. Each successively shorter tone nests inside the previous, forming concentric harmonic shells. The briefest note sits at the still center of the sound.
Grid: A square harmonic diagram with concentric colored rings, one per tone, ordered from longest duration outside to shortest inside.
"Relay batons stacked into a champion's trophy by distance run"
120b: k=1
See: Across an empty field, relay batons of different colors are scattered. Each baton represents a leg of the race — some legs are long sprints, others short dashes. Each baton has a different color and length.
Do: The batons are assembled into a victory monument: the longest baton defines the square pedestal and wraps the outside. The next longest forms the next inner tier. Each successive baton nests inside, one layer deep, until the shortest baton crowns the center.
Grid: A square trophy cross-section with colored concentric tiers, longest leg forming the outer edge, shortest at the core.
We need to infer rule: From example, input grid has scattered colored points representing batons of different colors and lengths. Output is a small square (6x6) with concentric layers: outermost B, then G, then M center 2x2. So longest baton defines outer square, next longest inner, etc. In input, we have colors B, G, M. Need to determine lengths: maybe count of contiguous cells in a line? Let's examine example input: there are B's forming a vertical line? Let's map coordinates. Input size 21x21. B appears at column? Let's locate: row2 (0-index?) Actually rows start at 0. At row2 (third row) there is B at column? The line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B at column 13? Let's count: there are 14 dots then B then rest. So column 13 (0-index). Then many rows have B at same column forming vertical line from row2 to row7? Let's see rows 2-7 have B at column 13. Row8-9 have M at column 8? Actually rows 8-9 have M at column 8 (0-index). G appears at column 4 rows 3-6? Actually rows 3-6 have G at column 4. So we have three colors each forming a line segment (vertical). Their lengths: B line length = rows 2-7 inclusive = 6 cells. G line length = rows 3-6 inclusive = 4 cells. M line length = rows 8-9 inclusive = 2 cells. So lengths descending: B longest (6), G (4), M (2). Output is 6x6 square with outermost B, then G, then M 2x2 center. So rule: Identify each colored line (baton) of same color, its length (number of cells). Then construct a square of size equal to longest length (maybe length). Fill concentric layers with colors ordered by length descending, each layer thickness 1 cell. The innermost layer size equals shortest length? In example, shortest length 2 => inner square 2x2. Indeed. Now test input: we have colors G, O, M, A. Need to find lengths of each colored line. Let's parse. Grid 21x21 again. Rows: 0-3 all dots. Row4 (index4): ". . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at column 6? Count: positions 0-5 dots, then G at 6. So single G? Only one G? Let's see other rows. Row5 all dots. Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . ." O at column 10? Actually after 10 dots? Let's count: columns 0-9 dots, column10 O, rest dots. Row7 same O at column10. Row8 same O at column10. Row9 all dots. Row10 all dots. Row11: ". . M M M M M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So M from column2 to column6? Let's count: columns 0-1 dots, then M at 2,3,4,5,6 (5 cells). So length 5. Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . ." A at column10. Rows13-18: each have A at column10 (rows13-18). Let's count rows: row13,14,15,16,17,18 each have A at column10. That's 7 rows? Let's list: rows12-18 inclusive have A? Row12 has A, row13 A, row14 A, row15 A, row16 A, row17 A, row18 A. That's 7 rows (12-18). So length 7. Also there is G only one cell? maybe there are more G elsewhere? Only row4 has G. So length 1. O line length: rows6-8 inclusive = 3 cells. M line length: row11 only? Actually only row11 has M's, not v ... [1432 chars truncated]
"Storm fronts coalescing into a hurricane eye by reach"
120b: k=1
See: Weather bands of different colors drift across a calm black sky. Each band stretches across the atmosphere — some spanning wide, others narrow. Each is a single color and moves in one direction.
Do: The bands spiral inward to form a hurricane: the widest-reaching front wraps the outermost wall. The next widest tightens inside it. Each successively narrower band forms the next inner ring until the smallest disturbance becomes the quiet eye at the center.
Grid: A square cross-section of the storm — concentric colored rings from widest band on the outside to narrowest at the calm center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with scattered colored lines? Output is 6x6 pattern: concentric rings: outer B, then G, then M center 2x2. In input, there were bands: B vertical line? Let's examine example1 input: size 21x21? There are B column at column? Let's map coordinates: rows 0-20. B appears at column 13? Actually line: row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B at column 13 (0-index). Also rows 3-7 have B at column 13 as well. So vertical blue line of length 6? Actually rows 2-7 inclusive (6 rows). Also G vertical line at column 4 rows 3-7? Let's see rows 3-7 have G at column 4. So green vertical line of same length. M appears at rows 8-9 column 8? Actually rows 8-9 have M at column 8. So orange? Actually M magenta at column 8 rows 8-9 (2 rows). So three bands: green, blue, magenta, each vertical line of different lengths: green length 5? rows3-7 (5). Blue length 6? rows2-7 (6). Magenta length 2 rows8-9. They are aligned horizontally at different columns: green left of blue left of magenta? Actually columns: G at 4, B at 13, M at 8? Wait M column 8 is between G and B. In output, we have concentric rings: outer B, then G, then M center. So ordering by length? Blue longest -> outermost. Green medium -> middle. Magenta shortest -> inner. Also positions: they become centered to form square 6x6. So rule: take colored bands (lines) of varying lengths, sort by length descending, map to concentric squares (rings) with outermost color = longest band, etc. The size of output square equals (2*max_len?) Let's compute lengths: blue length 6, green length 5, magenta length 2. Output size 6. How derived? Possibly side length = longest length? Blue length 6 => output 6x6. Yes. Construct concentric rings: outermost ring all cells = color of longest band (blue). Next inner ring (size-2) = color of second longest (green). Next inner ring (size-4) = color of third (magenta). Since magenta length 2, inner region is 2x2. That matches. Thus algorithm: Identify distinct colors (non-black) that appear as contiguous straight lines? Determine their lengths (count of cells). Sort descending. Output square of size equal to max length. Fill with concentric rings: outermost ring color of longest, then next, etc. If more colors than possible rings? Probably. Now test input: need to find colored bands and lengths. Let's parse test input grid (size maybe 21x22?). Provided rows 0-20? Let's count columns: first row has 22 entries? ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 22 columns. So grid 21 rows? Actually rows listed 0-20 (21 rows). Good. Now locate colored cells: Row4 (0-index) has G at column? Row4: ". . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Count: columns 0-5 '.' then column6 G? Let's index: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 G,7 ., etc. So G at col6. Rows6-8 have O at column? Row6: "... . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . ." Let's count: O at column? Let's count columns: there are many ... [2839 chars truncated]
"Walls built from salvaged beams, longest timber frames the outermost room"
120b: k=1
See: Across a vacant lot lie colored beams of different lengths — some long enough for load-bearing walls, others just short posts. Each beam is a different material and color.
Do: The architect builds a nested floorplan: the longest beam defines the outer wall of the square structure. The next longest becomes the wall of the first inner room. Each shorter beam frames a smaller room inside the last, until the shortest beam marks only the innermost closet.
Grid: A square blueprint of nested rooms, each wall one beam thick, longest on the perimeter, shortest enclosing the center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with scattered colored cells: B column vertical line? Let's examine example 1 input: many rows 21x21? Output is 6x6 pattern: outer border B, inner region G, inner 2x2 M. So rule: find longest beam (most cells?) of a color? In input, there are B vertical line of length? Let's count: B appears at column? In input rows 3-7 have B at column? Row indices starting 0? Let's map: rows 2-6 have B at column 13? Actually row 2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . ." So B at column 13 (0-index). Row 3-6 also B at same column. Row 7 also B at column 13. So B vertical line length 6? rows 2-7 inclusive =6 cells. G appears vertical line at column 4 rows 3-6? Actually rows 3-6 have G at column 4. So G length 4. M appears vertical line at column 8 rows 8-9? Actually rows 8-9 have M at column 8. length 2. So we have three beams of different colors, lengths 6,4,2. Output is nested squares with outermost color B (longest), then G, then M. So rule: Identify colored lines (beams) that are straight contiguous cells either vertical or horizontal? They are vertical lines. The longest defines outer square border, next defines inner border, etc. The output is a square of size (2*number_of_beams+? Actually output size 6 corresponds to longest length 6? Yes outer border thickness 1, inner size = longest length? Let's think: longest beam length =6 => output grid size =6? Indeed output is 6x6. So output dimension equals length of longest beam. The pattern: create nested squares where each layer corresponds to a beam color, ordered by length descending. The innermost square size equals length of shortest beam? In example shortest length 2 => inner 2x2 of M. Yes. Thus algorithm: Find all colors (non-.) that form a straight line (contiguous) either vertical or horizontal. Determine their lengths. Sort descending. Create square of size equal to longest length. Fill layers: outermost border with longest color, then next inner border with next color, etc. If there are k colors, we will have k layers. The innermost region will be a square of size equal to shortest length, filled with that color. Now test input: need to identify colored lines. Let's parse test input grid (21x? Actually rows 21?). Provided 21 rows? Let's count lines: from first line to last line there are 21 rows (0-20). Each row has 22 columns? Let's count first row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 22 columns. So grid 21x22? Actually 21 rows, 22 columns. We need to locate colored cells: G at row 4 column? Row 4: ". . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at column 6 (0-index). Only one G? No other G elsewhere. So G line length maybe vertical? Let's see other rows for G: none else. So maybe G is a single cell (length 1). But we need beams of different lengths. O appears: rows 6-8 have O at column 10? Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . ." column 10. Row7 same, row8 same. So O vertical line length 3. M ... [3083 chars truncated]
"Defensive perimeters ranked by the length of each regiment's battle line"
120b: k=2
See: Colored regiments are stationed at scattered positions across a dark battlefield. Each regiment forms a single-file line — some are large with many soldiers stretching far, others are small squads of just a few.
Do: The general orders a fortification: the regiment with the longest line forms the outermost defensive wall. The next longest garrisons just inside. Each smaller regiment mans the next inner perimeter until the smallest squad guards the command post at the center.
Grid: A square fortress cross-section with concentric colored defensive rings, each one soldier thick, largest regiment on the outside.
We need to infer rule: From examples, we have input with scattered colored lines (regiments). Output is a concentric square of colors, each ring corresponds to a regiment sorted by length (longest outermost). The output grid size seems to be minimal square that can contain all rings? Example1: Input had B vertical line of length? Let's examine. Example1 input: grid 21x21? Actually many rows. There is a vertical line of B at column? Let's locate: row2? Actually row index starting 0. B appears at column? In rows 2-7 there is B at column? Let's count: row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . .". So B at column 13 (0-index). Also rows 3-7 have B at same column. So B line length 6? rows 2-7 inclusive = 6 cells. Also there is G vertical line at column 4 rows 3-7? Actually rows 3-7 have G at column 4. So G line length 5? rows 3-7 inclusive =5. M vertical line at column 8 rows 8-9? Actually rows 8-9 have M at column 8. length 2. So lengths: B=6, G=5, M=2. Output is 6x6 grid with outer ring B, inner ring G, inner 2x2 M. Indeed output shows B border, then G interior, then M 2x2 center. So rule: take each colored line (regiment) which is a straight line (vertical/horizontal?) In examples they are vertical lines. Determine length (number of cells). Sort descending. Build concentric squares (rings) each one cell thick, using colors in order of length descending (largest outermost). The size of final square = 2*max_len? Wait outer ring thickness 1, inner ring thickness 1, etc. For three colors lengths 6,5,2 produce 6x6 output. How derived? Outer ring side length = length of longest line? In example1 longest length =6 (B). Output side =6. Example2: Input has R line length? Let's see: row4 has "R R R R R R R R" eight Rs? Actually row4: ". . . R R R R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". That's 8 Rs horizontally? Wait they are contiguous horizontally. So R line length =8. G line length? rows 12 have "G G G G" four Gs horizontally. A line length? row9 has A single? Actually row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . .". So A length 1. Output side length =5? Actually output grid is 5x5. Wait longest length 8 but output side 5. Hmm maybe they consider number of distinct regiments = number of colors? Not. Let's examine example2 more carefully. Input: R line is horizontal length 8 (maybe). G line horizontal length 4. A line single. Output is 5x5 with outer ring R, inner ring G, center A. So side length = number of colors? 3 colors => side = 2*3-1 =5. Indeed for 3 colors, side = 2*3-1 =5. For example1 also 3 colors, side = 2*3-1 =5? But output side is 6, not 5. Wait example1 output is 6x6. Let's count rows: they show 6 rows each with 6 entries. So side=6. That's not 5. So maybe side = max length? B length 6 => side 6. Example2 max length 8 but side 5, not match. Maybe they take the number of distinct colors (regiments) and produce a square where outer ring thickness equals length of longest line? Not. Let's compute lengths ... [10718 chars truncated]
"Curtains drawn inward by the length of each act"
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored curtain rods of different lengths are scattered across the dark backstage. Each rod holds a curtain of a unique color. Some rods span nearly the whole stage; one is barely a handkerchief.
Do: The stage manager hangs the curtains as nested reveals: the longest curtain frames the outermost proscenium. The next longest hangs just inside. Each shorter curtain creates a tighter frame, drawing the audience's eye inward until the shortest curtain reveals only the spotlight center.
Grid: A square stage viewed from above — concentric colored curtain frames, each one layer thick, longest framing the outside, shortest revealing the center.
"Hedge borders planted by the length of each cutting"
120b: k=2
See: Colored hedge cuttings of different lengths lie scattered on dark soil. Each cutting is a single vivid color — some are long enough to border a garden bed, others are mere sprigs.
Do: The gardener plants them as nested borders: the longest cutting defines the outermost garden hedge. The next longest is planted just inside. Each shorter cutting forms the next inner border ring until the smallest sprig marks the center of the garden.
Grid: A square garden plot with concentric colored hedge borders, each one row thick, longest on the perimeter, smallest at the heart.
We need to infer rule: From examples, input contains scattered colored cells of various colors representing "cuttings". Need to produce concentric border pattern with colors sorted by length? Let's analyze. Example1 input: grid 21x21? Actually many rows. Colors present: B (blue) vertical line? Let's locate: In input, there is a column of B at column? Row2? Let's map coordinates roughly. Input shows B at positions (row2? Actually row index starting 0). Row2 (third row) has B at column 13 (0-index). Row3 has G at column 4 and B at 13. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 has B at 13. Row9 has M at column 9? Actually row8 (0-index) shows ". . . . . . . . M . . . . . . . . . . . . .". So M at column 8. Row9 same. So we have three colors: B vertical line, G vertical line left, M vertical line somewhere right? Actually M column 8, B column 13, G column 4. So three cuttings of lengths: B appears from row2 to row7? Actually B appears rows 2-7 (6 rows) plus row8? Row8 also B? Row8 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . . . .". Yes B at row8 column13. So B length 7? Let's count rows with B: rows 2-8 inclusive = 7 rows. G appears rows 3-6? Actually rows 3-6 have G at column4 (4 rows). Also row2? No. So G length 4. M appears rows 8-9? Actually rows 8-9 have M at column8 (2 rows). So lengths: B longest, G medium, M shortest. Output is a 6x6 grid with concentric border: outermost B, then G, then M center 2x2. Indeed output shows B border, inside G border, inside M 2x2. So rule: Identify colored lines (cuttings) of same color forming straight line (maybe vertical/horizontal) of varying lengths. The longest defines outer border color, next defines next inner border, etc. The output is a square of size (2*number_of_colors + something?). In example1, three colors => output size 6 (since border thickness 1 each, total size = 2* (num_colors) =6? Actually with 3 colors, we have outer border (color1), inner border (color2), inner-most region (color3) maybe fill with color3? In output, innermost is 2x2 of M, not 1x1. So size = 2* (num_colors) ? For 3 colors, size = 6, yes. The innermost region is a square of size 2 (since each border thickness 1). So general: output is a square of side length = 2 * N where N = number of distinct colors (cuttings). The outermost border is color of longest cutting, then next, etc, until innermost region filled with color of shortest cutting. Check Example2: Input colors: R vertical line? Actually there is a horizontal line of R: row4 has "R R R R R R R R" (8 Rs) at columns 4-11? That's length 8. Also there is A single cell at row9 column? Actually row9 has A at column? Row9 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . .". So A is a single cell. Also G block: row12 has "G G G G" (4 Gs) at columns 8-11 maybe. So lengths: R longest (8), G medium (4), A shortest (1). Output is 5x5 grid (since 3 colors => side 5? Wait 2*N =6? But output is 5x5. Let's verify: Output shows 5 rows each 5 columns. So side ... [5139 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains a rectangular frame made of three distinct elements: (1) two vertical columns of grey (X) cells forming the left and right walls, (2) azure (A) cells at the four corners connecting the tops and bottoms of the X walls, and (3) a row of A cells along the top edge and bottom edge between the corner A's. Inside the frame, some cells are azure (A) and the rest are black (.). Scattered across the grid outside this frame are additional azure (A) cells that serve as distractors.
Do: 1. Locate the two vertical columns of grey (X) cells in the grid. These form the left and right walls of a rectangle. 2. Identify the azure (A) cells that sit directly above and below each X column — these are the corner cells of the rectangle. The top row of the rectangle is the row containing the A corners above the X walls; the bottom row is the row containing the A corners below the X walls. 3. Extract the sub-grid defined by this rectangle: from the top corner row to the bottom corner row (inclusive), and from the left X column to the right X column (inclusive). 4. Output this extracted sub-grid exactly as it appears. All content outside the rectangle is discarded.
Grid: The input grid is variable in size with a black (.) background. Embedded in it is a rectangular frame whose width equals the horizontal distance between the two X columns (inclusive) and whose height equals the vertical span from the top A corners to the bottom A corners (inclusive). The output grid has exactly these dimensions. The frame's walls are grey (X), its corners and top/bottom edges are azure (A), its interior contains a mix of black (.) and azure (A) cells, and the background outside the frame is black with scattered azure distractors.
"A treasure chest lies buried in a field of scattered gems — only the iron-bound chest matters."
120b: k=2
See: Across a dark field, azure gemstones lie scattered like fallen stars. But among them, two pillars of grey iron stand upright, and azure cornerstone jewels cap their tops and bottoms, forming the frame of a buried chest. Inside the chest, some compartments hold azure gems while others sit empty. The gems strewn outside the chest are fool's gold — glittering distractions left by wanderers.
Do: Find the two iron pillars rising from the darkness — they are the sides of the chest. Look for the azure cornerstones that seal each pillar's top and bottom; these mark where the lid begins and the base ends. Lift the chest out of the ground whole, leaving every scattered gem behind in the dirt. What you hold in your hands is the treasure — nothing more, nothing less.
Grid: The dark field stretches in all directions, littered with stray azure gems that catch the eye. The chest is defined by its grey iron walls running vertically and its azure cornerstones and trim running horizontally across the top and bottom. Inside the chest, azure gems sit in some slots while others are empty black velvet. The chest's dimensions are fixed by its own construction — pillar to pillar, cornerstone to cornerstone — and everything beyond its edges is just empty earth.
We need to infer rule. From examples, we have input larger grid with many colors, output smaller grid focusing on a "chest" defined by grey pillars (X) and azure corners (A). The output seems to be a subgrid extracted: the rectangle bounded by the outermost X columns (vertical pillars) and outermost A rows (top and bottom). Inside that rectangle, we keep the original colors? Let's examine Example1. Input1 grid size? Let's write rows (10? Actually given 9 rows? Let's count). Input lines: 1 ". A . . . . . . . . ." 2 ". . A . . . A . . . A" 3 ". . . . . . . . . A A" 4 ". . A . . . . . A . ." 5 "A . X . . . . . X . ." 6 ". . X . . A A . X . ." 7 ". . X . . . . . X . ." 8 ". . A . A . . . A . ." 9 ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 11 columns. Output: A . . . . . A X . . . . . X X . . A A . X X . . . . . X A . A . . . A That's 5 rows, 7 columns. Now locate X pillars: In input, there are X's forming vertical lines? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Row5 col3 is X. Row6 col3 X, row7 col3 X, row8 col3? row8 col3 A not X. Row9 col3 . So vertical line at col3 rows5-7. Also there is another vertical line at col9? Row5 col9 X, row6 col9 X, row7 col9 X, row8 col9 A? Actually row8 col9 A, row9 col9 A? Wait row9 col9 A? Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." columns: 1 .,2 A,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A,10 A,11 . So col9 A. So X column at col9 rows5-7. So two pillars of X at columns 3 and 9 rows5-7. The top and bottom corners are A's at the ends of these pillars: At top of pillar (row5) there is A at col1? Actually row5 col1 A, not at pillar column. But description: azure cornerstones cap their tops and bottoms. In example, top of each pillar maybe row5? Actually pillars start at row5 (first X). The top corner A maybe at same row but left/right of pillar? Let's examine output rectangle: It includes rows5-9? Output rows correspond to rows5-9? Output first row is "A . . . . . A". That matches row5 columns 1? Let's extract subgrid rows5-9 columns1-7? Row5 columns1-7: "A . X . . . ." => A . X . . . . Not match output first row (A . . . . . A). So not that. Maybe rectangle defined by outermost X columns (col3 and col9) and outermost A rows (topmost A in those columns? Actually topmost A in column3? There is no A in column3. But there are A's at row5 col1 and row9 col2 etc. Let's examine output content: It contains A's at corners: top-left A, top-right A, bottom-left A, bottom-right A. Also X's forming vertical sides inside? Output rows show X at column1 rows2-4? Actually output grid: Row1: A . . . . . A Row2: X . . . . . X Row3: X . . A A . X Row4: X . . . . . X Row5: A . A . . . A So pattern: rectangle of width 7, height5. The leftmost column: A, X, X, X, A. Rightmost column: A, X, X, X, A. So vertical sides are X except corners A. Inside there are some A's at row3 col4-5 (two A's) and row5 col3 A. Now locate these in original input: The rectangle likely corresponds to region bounded by the two X pillars (col3 and col9) and the topmost A above left pillar and b ... [7680 chars truncated]
"A cell membrane encloses precious organelles while free-floating proteins drift in the cytoplasm around it."
120b: k=1
See: A living cell viewed under a microscope: a rigid membrane with reinforced walls and protein-studded junctions surrounds internal structures, while identical-looking proteins float freely in the surrounding fluid.
Do: Identify the intact cell membrane — the rigid walls and their junction points — and extract everything within its boundary. Ignore the free-floating proteins outside; they are not part of the cell.
Grid: The membrane walls are grey, the junction proteins at corners and edges are azure, the cell interior contains azure organelles on a black background, and the surrounding cytoplasm is black with scattered azure proteins.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) and output grid. Let's parse. Example Input size? Looks like 9 rows? Actually given lines: ". A . . . . . . . . ." ". . A . . . A . . . A" ". . . . . . . . . A A" ". . A . . . . . A . ." "A . X . . . . . X . ." ". . X . . A A . X . ." ". . X . . . . . X . ." ". . A . A . . . A . ." ". A . . . . . . A A ." That's 9 rows, 11 columns? Count first row: ". A . . . . . . . . . ." that's 12? Let's count: tokens separated by space. .(1) A2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .10 .11 .12 => 12 columns. So 9x12. Output grid: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So rule extracts a subgrid bounded by something (membrane). The description: grey walls (X) and azure corners/edges (A). The interior contains azure organelles on black background (A on .). Surrounding cytoplasm black with scattered azure proteins (A). So we need to find a rectangular shape formed by X (grey) walls and A at corners/edges? In example, look at input: there are X forming a rectangle? Let's locate X positions. Rows with X: row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." positions col3 and col9? Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." col3 and col9. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." not X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." no X. Also rows 1-4 have no X. So X at columns 3 and 9 across rows 5-7 (maybe also row4? no). That's a vertical walls. Also maybe top and bottom walls are A? Let's see A at corners: row5 col1 is A, row5 col11? Actually row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." col1 A, col3 X, col9 X, rest . . . . . . . . . . . So leftmost A maybe part of membrane corner? Row9 col2 A etc. But output is 5x7. Let's see which region extracted: Output rows correspond to region inside rectangle defined by X walls? Output includes A at top-left corner? Output first row: "A . . . . . A". That matches maybe top row of rectangle: left corner A, right corner A. In input, top of rectangle maybe row5? Row5 has A at col1, X at col3, X at col9, and maybe A at col11? Not exactly. Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 1-12. Row5: col1 A, col3 X, col9 X. No other A near col? col? maybe col11? row5 col11 . So not. Row6: col3 X, col6 A, col7 A, col9 X. Row7: col3 X, col9 X. Row8: col3 A, col5 A, col9 A. Row9: col2 A, col9 A, col10 A. Hmm rectangle maybe from col3 to col9 (X walls) and rows5-7 (vertical). But top and bottom walls maybe A's at row5 col? Actually top wall would be row5 with X's as corners? But corners should be A (azure). In rectangle, corners at (row5,col3) is X not A. So maybe rectangle defined by A's forming border, with X inside? Let's examine output: interior contains A's and X's. Output grid 5x7: Let's map output coordinates. Row1: A . . . . . A. Row2: X . . . . . X. Row3: X . . A A . X. Row4: X . . . . . X. Row5: A . A . . . A. So border: corners are A at (1,1), (1,7), (5,1), (5,7). Edges: left and right edges are X except corners? Actually left edge ... [9726 chars truncated]
"Two dark pillars of a nebula bracket a stellar nursery — nearby field stars are mere foreground contamination."
120b: k=1
See: A dark void with scattered azure field stars. Two vertical grey nebular pillars stand parallel, connected at top and bottom by azure emission ridges with bright azure knots at the corners. Between the pillars, azure protostars glow amid dark gas.
Do: Identify the nebular pillars and their connecting emission ridges. Extract only the stellar nursery bounded by this structure. Field stars outside the pillars are foreground objects — subtract them.
Grid: Void is black, pillars are grey, emission ridges and knots are azure, nursery interior has azure and black, field stars are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) and output grid. Let's map. First, note colors: '.' black, A azure, X grey, others not present. In example input, there are azure A scattered, grey X forming vertical pillars? Let's view dimensions. Input appears 9 rows? Actually lines: count rows: 1 ". A . . . . . . . . ." 2 ". . A . . . A . . . A" 3 ". . . . . . . . . A A" 4 ". . A . . . . . A . ." 5 "A . X . . . . . X . ." 6 ". . X . . A A . X . ." 7 ". . X . . . . . X . ." 8 ". . A . A . . . A . ." 9 ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 11 columns. Output grid is 5 rows, 7 columns: Row1 "A . . . . . A" Row2 "X . . . . . X" Row3 "X . . A A . X" Row4 "X . . . . . X" Row5 "A . A . . . A" Observations: Output seems to be a cropped region containing the "structure": vertical grey pillars (X) and azure A at corners and interior. In input, where are vertical columns of X? Look at column positions: column 3? Let's index columns 0-10. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col2 and col8. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => X at col2 and col8. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col2 and col8. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. So there are two vertical lines of X at columns 2 and 8 rows 5-7 (maybe also row4? row4 has no X). So pillars of length 3. Connected at top and bottom by azure ridges? At top row? Row4 maybe has A at col2? Row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." => A at col2 and col8. So azure A at same columns at row4 (just above X). At bottom row? Row8 maybe? Row8 has A at col2? Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => A at col2 and col8? Actually col2 is A, col8 is A. Yes. Thus structure: two vertical grey pillars (X) with azure A at top and bottom connecting them, forming rectangle. Inside rectangle (between columns 2 and 8, rows 5-7) there are some azure A's: row6 has A A at columns5,6 (inside). Also maybe other azure inside? Row6 also has X at col2 and col8 as sides. Output appears to be the minimal bounding box of this structure, but also includes some extra azure outside? Let's compute bounding box: min row = 4 (row index 3) where top A appears, max row = 8 (row index 7) where bottom A appears. min col = 2, max col = 8. That gives height 5 rows (rows 4-8 inclusive) and width 7 columns (2-8 inclusive). Output dimensions 5x7 matches. Now output content: Let's extract subgrid rows 4-8, cols 2-8 from input. Rows (1-indexed): Row4 (index3): ". . A . . . . . A . ." columns 2-8 => col2 A, col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 .? Wait need mapping: columns 0-10. Row4: positions:0'.',1'.',2'A',3'.',4'.',5'.',6'.',7'.',8'A',9'.',10'.'. So cols2-8 inclusive: [2]A,3'.',4'.',5'.',6'.',7'.',8'A' => "A . . . . . A". matches output row1. Row5 (index4): "A . X . . . . . X . ." cols2-8: col2 X? Wait row5 col0 A,1'.',2'X',3'.',4'.',5'.',6'.',7'.',8'X',9'.',10'.' => subgrid: X . . . . . X => matches output row2. Row6 (index5): ". . X . . A A . X . ." cols2-8: col2 X,3'.',4' ... [4886 chars truncated]
"A ship's porthole frames the sea — barnacles on the hull outside the glass don't change the view."
120b: k=1
See: A dark ocean with azure bioluminescent plankton drifting randomly. A rectangular porthole: grey iron frame on left and right sides, azure brass fittings along top and bottom edges and at the four corners. Through the glass, azure sea-lights and dark water are visible.
Do: Find the porthole — grey iron sides and azure brass fittings — and capture only the sea view framed within. Bioluminescence outside the porthole is hull-side scatter; ignore it.
Grid: Ocean is black, iron sides are grey, brass fittings are azure, the view has azure and black, plankton are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x? Let's parse example1. Input lines (I'll index rows): 1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." 2: ". . A . . . A . . . A" 3: ". . . . . . . . . A A" 4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." 5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." 6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." 7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." 8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." 9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." Output: Row1: "A . . . . . A" Row2: "X . . . . . X" Row3: "X . . A A . X" Row4: "X . . . . . X" Row5: "A . A . . . A" So output is 5 rows x7 columns. We need to see what region extracted: maybe the "porthole" defined by grey iron sides (X) and azure brass fittings (A) forming a rectangle. In input, X are grey, A azure. The rectangle likely bounded by X on left/right and A on top/bottom? Let's locate X's forming vertical lines? In input, there are X's forming a vertical column? Let's map coordinates. I'll create grid coordinates (row, col). Input width 11? Actually row1 has 11 entries: ". A . . . . . . . . .". So 11 columns. Let's list positions of X: Row5 col3? Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. Also row1-4 have no X. So there are two vertical lines of X at columns 3 and 9 from rows5-7 (three rows). That's like sides of rectangle. Now A's maybe top and bottom edges? Let's see A positions near those columns: Row5 col1 A, col? Row5 also has A at col1 and maybe at col11? Actually row5 ends with ".": col11 . So only A at col1. Row6 has A at col6 and col7. Row8 has A at col3,5,9. Row9 has A at col2,9,10. Also top rows have A scattered. But rectangle maybe defined by X sides and A corners? Let's see corners: At (row5,col3) X is side, but corner maybe at (row5,col3) is X not A. However description: grey iron sides and azure brass fittings at top/bottom edges and four corners. So rectangle frame: left/right sides are X (grey), top/bottom edges are A (azure), corners also A. Thus we need to find a rectangle where left/right columns are X, top/bottom rows are A, and corners are A (maybe overlapping). Then output the interior view (including frame?) The output includes A at corners? Let's examine output: It is 5x7. Does it correspond to rectangle extracted from input? Let's locate rectangle in input that matches size 5x7. Output first row: "A . . . . . A". That suggests top edge has A at leftmost and rightmost positions, interior '.' (black). So top edge of rectangle has A at corners only, not continuous A across top. But description said brass fittings along top and bottom edges and at four corners. Could be only at corners? Actually "azure brass fittings along top and bottom edges and at the four corners" could mean continuous line of A across top and bottom edges, plus corners also A (redundant). But output shows only corners A, not continuous. Maybe the rectangle extracted is the minimal boundi ... [7306 chars truncated]
"A chip package sits on a noisy circuit board — read only the die inside the package leads, not the stray signals on the board."
120b: fail
See: A dark circuit board with azure signal traces scattered randomly. A rectangular chip package: grey lead columns on left and right, azure bond wires along the top and bottom edges with azure pads at the corners. Inside the package, azure circuit elements on dark silicon.
Do: Locate the chip package by its grey leads and azure bond wires. Extract the die contents within the package boundary. Stray board signals outside are noise — discard them.
Grid: Board is black, leads are grey columns, bond wires and pads are azure, die interior has azure and black, stray signals are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids larger, output smaller subgrid containing something. The metaphor: chip package with grey leads columns left/right, azure bond wires top/bottom edges with azure pads at corners. Inside package azure and black. So we need to locate rectangle defined by grey columns (X) on left and right, azure (A) on top and bottom edges, corners A. Then extract interior (including azure and black) maybe output that interior region trimmed to just that rectangle? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input size? Let's count rows: appears 9 rows? Actually lines: 1 ". A . . . . . . . . ." 2 ". . A . . . A . . . A" 3 ". . . . . . . . . A A" 4 ". . A . . . . . A . ." 5 "A . X . . . . . X . ." 6 ". . X . . A A . X . ." 7 ". . X . . . . . X . ." 8 ". . A . A . . . A . ." 9 ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 12 columns. Output: A . . . . . A X . . . . . X X . . A A . X X . . . . . X A . A . . . A That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So output appears to be a subgrid extracted: maybe the rectangle bounded by X columns (grey) left/right and A rows top/bottom? Let's locate X columns in input: column indices (0-based). Let's map grid. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: . A . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . A . . . A . . . A Row2: . . . . . . . . . A A Row3: . . A . . . . . A . . Row4: A . X . . . . . X . . Row5: . . X . . A A . X . . Row6: . . X . . . . . X . . Row7: . . A . A . . . A . . Row8: . A . . . . . . A A . We see X at positions: row4 col2, row4 col8; row5 col2, col8; row6 col2, col8; row7 none? row7 none; row8 none. So vertical columns of X at col2 and col8 from rows4-6. That's like leads columns. The top and bottom edges of chip are azure A at corners? Let's see top row of rectangle maybe row4? Actually row4 has A at col0, X at col2, X at col8. Row5 has A A at col5,6 inside. Row6 none. Row7 has A at col2? Wait row7 col2 is A? row7: ". . A . A . . . A . ." So col2 A, col4 A, col8 A. Hmm. Maybe the chip rectangle is defined by the outermost X columns and the outermost A rows that intersect? Let's find rectangle that encloses all X and A that form border. In output, dimensions 5x7. Let's see output pattern: first row: A . . . . . A (A at leftmost and rightmost). second row: X . . . . . X (X at leftmost and rightmost). third row: X . . A A . X (X left, X right, A A inside). fourth row: X . . . . . X. fifth row: A . A . . . A. So border: top row A's, bottom row A's, left/right columns X except corners where A. Inside there are some A's at positions (row2 col3,4) and (row4 col2?) Actually row4 (0-index) is bottom row: A . A . . . A (A at col0,2,6). So interior A's. Thus output seems to be the minimal rectangle that contains all X and A? Let's compute bounding box of all X and A in input. Find min row containing X or A? Input has many A scattered. But maybe we consider only those that form chip: the rectangle where X columns appear and A at top/bottom edges aligning with those columns. In input, X columns at col2 and col8 rows4-6. ... [8895 chars truncated]
"A sacred gateway marked by stone sentinels and celestial runes opens onto a divine realm — wandering spirits outside the gate are illusions."
120b: k=1
See: A dark void with azure spirit-lights wandering randomly. A rectangular gateway: grey stone sentinels standing as left and right pillars, azure celestial runes inscribed across the lintel and threshold and glowing at each corner. Within the gateway, azure divine lights and sacred darkness.
Do: Find the sacred gateway — grey sentinels and azure runes — and reveal only the divine realm they frame. The wandering spirit-lights beyond the gate are illusions with no meaning.
Grid: Void is black, sentinels are grey, runes and corner glows are azure, the divine realm has azure and black, spirit-lights are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) size? Let's parse. Example Input lines (10 rows? Actually given 9 rows? Let's count): Row1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . A . . . A . . . A" Row3: ". . . . . . . . . A A" Row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 11 columns? Let's count row1 tokens: ". A . . . . . . . . ." = 11 columns. Good. Output grid: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So transformation extracts a subgrid defined by something: "grey sentinels (X) left and right pillars, azure runes (A) across lintel and threshold and glowing at each corner." So we need to find rectangle whose left and right borders are X (grey), top and bottom rows have A at corners and maybe across? Let's examine input to locate rectangle. Look at input: there are X's forming vertical lines? Row5 col3 is X (index 3). Row6 col3 X, row7 col3 X, row8 col3 X, row9 col3 X, row10? Actually only 9 rows. So column 3 (0-index?) Let's index columns 1-11. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. So there is a vertical pair of X columns at col3 and col9 rows5-7 (three rows). That's like left and right pillars. Now top border maybe A's across? Look at rows5-7 columns between 3 and 9 inclusive? Let's extract subgrid rows5-7, cols3-9 (7 columns). Row5 cols3-9: X . . . . X (col3 X, col4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 X) => pattern X.....X Row6: X . . A A . X (col3 X, col4 .,5 .,6 A,7 A,8 .,9 X) => X..AA.X Row7: X . . . . . X => X.....X Now output grid is 5 rows 7 columns. It seems they added top and bottom rows of A's? Output rows: Row1: A . . . . . A Row2: X . . . . . X Row3: X . . A A . X Row4: X . . . . . X Row5: A . A . . . A So they took rectangle defined by X pillars (left/right) and A corners (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) maybe from somewhere else. In input, where are A's at corners? At row5 col3 is X not A. But there are A's elsewhere maybe above? Let's search for A's at positions aligning with pillars. Look at row4 col3? Row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." => col3 A, col9 A. That's above the X pillars (row4). So top border maybe row4 with A at col3 and col9, and maybe also A's across top? Row4 also has A at col3 and col9 only, not across. Bottom border maybe row8? Row8 col3? Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => col3 A, col5 A, col9 A. So bottom border includes A at col3, col5, col9. Thus rectangle corners: top-left (row4 col3) A, top-right (row4 col9) A, bottom-left (row8 col3) A, bottom-right (row8 col9) A. The left/right pillars are X at rows5-7 col3 and col9. So rectangle spans rows4-8 (5 rows) and ... [4966 chars truncated]
"Spotlight operators frame the stage with rigid beams — dancers who wander into the wings are no longer part of the choreography."
120b: fail
See: A dark stage with azure costume sequins glinting randomly in the wings. A rectangular spotlight frame: grey vertical beams on left and right, azure horizontal beams across the top and bottom with bright azure intersections at the corners. Inside the frame, azure dancers move on dark flooring.
Do: Find the spotlight frame — grey vertical beams and azure horizontal beams — and capture only the choreography illuminated within. Sequin glints in the wings are distractions; cut them.
Grid: Stage is black, vertical beams are grey, horizontal beams and corners are azure, the framed dance has azure and black, wing glints are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with colors: . black, A azure, X grey, etc. The description: "spotlight frame — grey vertical beams and azure horizontal beams — and capture only the choreography illuminated within. Sequin glints in the wings are distractions; cut them." Interpretation: Find rectangle formed by vertical grey lines (X) and horizontal azure lines (A) at top/bottom? Actually horizontal beams are azure (A) across top and bottom, corners bright azure intersections. Vertical beams are grey (X). Inside frame there are azure and black (A and .). The output seems to be the interior of that rectangle, maybe cropping to that region, preserving colors inside (including A and X? Wait X are vertical beams, they become border? In output examples, we see X appear as border? Let's examine Example1. Input Example1 grid size? Let's reconstruct quickly. Rows (maybe 9 rows, 11 columns). Output is 5 rows x 7 columns. Let's locate rectangle: In input, there are X's forming vertical lines? Let's view input lines: Row0: ". A . . . . . . . . ." Row1: ". . A . . . A . . . A" Row2: ". . . . . . . . . A A" Row3: ". . A . . . . . A . ." Row4: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Row5: ". . X . . A A . X . ." Row6: ". . X . . . . . X . ." Row7: ". . A . A . . . A . ." Row8: ". A . . . . . . A A ." We see X's at positions column2? Actually row4 col2 is X (0-index). Row5 col2 X, row6 col2 X, row7 col2? row7 col2 is A not X. Row8 col2? row8 col2 is .? Wait row8 col2 is .? Row8: ". A . . . . . . A A ." So col2 is '.'. Also X at column8? row4 col8 X, row5 col8 X, row6 col8 X, row7 col8? row7 col8 A, row8 col8 A. Thus vertical line of X at col2 and col8 from rows4-6 maybe forms vertical beams. Horizontal azure beams maybe rows? Look for row5 maybe has A's across? Row5: ". . X . . A A . X . ." has A at col5 and col6 (adjacent). Not full horizontal line. But output is 5x7 grid: Rows: 0: "A . . . . . A" 1: "X . . . . . X" 2: "X . . A A . X" 3: "X . . . . . X" 4: "A . A . . . A" Let's see if this matches cropping region bounded by X columns (col2 to col8) and maybe rows4-8? Let's extract subgrid rows4-8, cols2-8 inclusive (7 columns). Let's compute: Rows4-8 (indices 4-8): Row4: "A . X . . . . . X . ." columns 0-10. Extract cols2-8: col2 X, col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 X => "X . . . . . X" Row5: ". . X . . A A . X . ." cols2-8: col2 X, col3 ., col4 ., col5 A, col6 A, col7 ., col8 X => "X . . A A . X" Row6: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => "X . . . . . X" Row7: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => cols2-8: col2 A, col3 ., col4 A, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 A => "A . A . . . A" Row8: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => cols2-8: col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 A? Wait col8 is A? Actually row8 col8 is A (since there are A at col8 and col9). So " . . . . . . A". But output row0 is "A . . . . . A". Hmm mismatch. Maybe rectangle includes row0? Let's check rows0-4? Actually output first row "A . . . . . ... [8910 chars truncated]
"A rectangular vein of ore is trapped between two dikes — surface mineral flecks are weathering artifacts, not part of the deposit."
120b: k=1
See: A dark rock matrix with azure mineral flecks scattered on the surface. A rectangular ore body: grey igneous dikes forming left and right walls, with azure crystalline seams along the top and bottom contacts and azure mineral clusters at the corners. Inside, azure ore pockets sit in dark gangue.
Do: Identify the ore body bounded by grey dikes and azure contact seams. Extract only the material within this rectangular deposit. Surface mineral flecks outside the dikes are weathering products — discard them.
Grid: Rock matrix is black, dikes are grey, contact seams and corner clusters are azure, ore interior has azure and black, surface flecks are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) and output grid. Let's parse. Example Input dimensions? Let's count rows. Provided lines: ". A . . . . . . . . ." ". . A . . . A . . . A" ". . . . . . . . . A A" ". . A . . . . . A . ." "A . X . . . . . X . ." ". . X . . A A . X . ." ". . X . . . . . X . ." ". . A . A . . . A . ." ". A . . . . . . A A ." That's 9 rows, each 11 columns? Let's count first row: ". A . . . . . . . . ." that's 11 entries (including spaces). Yes 11 columns. Output grid lines: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So transformation extracts a rectangular region bounded by something. In description: grey dikes left/right walls, azure seams top/bottom, azure clusters corners. In example, grey = X, azure = A, black = . (background). So we need to find rectangle formed by X's as vertical walls? Let's examine input to locate rectangle. Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-8, cols 0-10. I'll write grid with characters. Row0: 0 .;1 A;2 .;3 .;4 .;5 .;6 .;7 .;8 .;9 .;10 . Row1: . . A . . . A . . . A Row2: . . . . . . . . . A A Row3: . . A . . . . . A . . Row4: A . X . . . . . X . . Row5: . . X . . A A . X . . Row6: . . X . . . . . X . . Row7: . . A . A . . . A . . Row8: . A . . . . . . A A . We see X's forming vertical lines at columns? At row4 col2 is X, row5 col2 X, row6 col2 X, row7 col2? row7 col2 is A not X. Row8 col2 . So left wall maybe column2? Right wall column8? Let's see X at col8 rows4,5,6. Yes row4 col8 X, row5 col8 X, row6 col8 X. So rectangle between columns 2 and 8 inclusive? The walls are X at those columns rows4-6. Top and bottom azure seams maybe A's at corners? At row4 col0 A (corner left top?), row4 col10 . Not. Let's examine rectangle interior: rows4-6, cols2-8. Let's extract subgrid: Rows4-6, cols2-8 (7 columns: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8) Row4: col2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X => X . . . . . X Row5: col2 X,3 .,4 .,5 A,6 A,7 .,8 X => X . . A A . X Row6: col2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X => X . . . . . X That matches middle three rows of output (rows1-3). Indeed output rows: Row0: A . . . . . A Row1: X . . . . . X Row2: X . . A A . X Row3: X . . . . . X Row4: A . A . . . A So output includes top and bottom rows with azure A at corners and maybe some A's inside? Let's see top row of output corresponds to row? Possibly row? The rectangle top seam is azure A's at positions above left and right walls? In input, above the X column at row3? Row3 col2 is A (above left wall). Row3 col8 is A? Row3 col8 is A (yes). Also maybe azure at corners row3 col2 and col8. Also there are azure A's inside rectangle top seam? In description azure seams along top and bottom contacts. So top seam is row3 (just above X walls) with A at columns 2 and 8, maybe also other A's inside? In input row3 col4? row3 col4 .; col5 .; col6 .; col7 . So only A at col2 and col8. Output top row: "A . . . . . A" matches that. Bottom seam: row7? Actually rectangle ... [4718 chars truncated]
"A pastry chef has piped a rigid frame of royal icing onto a dark chocolate sheet — cut along the frame and plate only what's inside."
120b: k=3
See: A dark chocolate slab with a rectangular border piped in two icings: stiff grey fondant for the vertical sides and delicate blue glaze for the horizontal edges and corners. Scattered blue sugar crystals dot the chocolate outside the border.
Do: Find the piped frame, cut precisely along its outer edge, and plate only the enclosed rectangle. Discard the chocolate and scattered sugar outside.
Grid: The slab is black, the vertical frame sides are grey, the horizontal edges and corners are azure, the filling has azure and black, and stray azure crystals appear outside the frame.
We need to infer rule. From description: dark chocolate slab = black (.) background. vertical frame sides = grey (X). horizontal edges and corners = azure (A). filling has azure and black. stray azure crystals outside frame. Goal: find piped frame (rectangle) composed of vertical sides X and horizontal edges A (including corners). Cut along outer edge, output only enclosed rectangle (including its interior). Discard outside. Thus we need to locate rectangle where top and bottom rows are A (maybe with some pattern) and left/right columns are X (vertical sides). Inside may contain A and . (black). Output that subgrid. Check examples. Example1 Input grid size? Let's parse quickly. Input lines (maybe 9 rows, 12 columns). Output is 5x7 grid. We need to locate rectangle in input. Let's map. I'll write coordinates. Input rows: 1: ". A . . . . . . . . . ." (12) 2: ". . A . . . A . . . A" 3: ". . . . . . . . . A A" 4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." 5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." 6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." 7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." 8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." 9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." Output 5 rows 7 cols: Row1: "A . . . . . A" Row2: "X . . . . . X" Row3: "X . . A A . X" Row4: "X . . . . . X" Row5: "A . A . . . A" We need to see rectangle in input that matches this pattern. Look for X vertical sides: columns where X appear in rows 5-7 maybe. In input rows 5-7 have X at column3? Let's index columns 1-12. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Positions: 1 A,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 . Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." X at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." X at col3 and col9. So vertical sides at col3 and col9 rows5-7. Also maybe row8? Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . .": no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A .": no X. Thus rectangle corners maybe at rows5-7, cols3-9. Top edge row5? Row5 col3 is X (left side) but top edge should be A? Actually description: horizontal edges and corners are azure (A). But in this rectangle, top edge row5 columns 3-9 includes X at col3 and X at col9 (vertical sides) and maybe A at top middle? Row5 has no A between. So maybe rectangle is rows5-9? Let's examine. Look for A horizontal edges: maybe row5 has A at col1? Not part. Let's examine output pattern: top row "A . . . . . A" corresponds to corners A at left and right. In input, where are A at corners? Possibly at row5 col1 is A (left corner) and row5 col? maybe col? Not. But output rectangle width 7 columns, height5 rows. In output, left column is A at top row, X for middle rows, A at bottom row. Right column similar. Thus rectangle's left side vertical is X except corners A. Right side same. In input, we have X vertical sides at col3 and col9 rows5-7, but corners maybe A at row5 col3? No it's X. So maybe rectangle is rows5-9, cols1-7? Let's test. Rows5-9, cols1-7: Row5: col1 A,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 . Row6: . . X . . A A Row7: . . X . . . . Row8: . . A . A . . Row9: . A . . . . . Now extract that subgrid 5x7: Rows5-9, cols1-7 produce: Row5: A . X . . . . ... [8544 chars truncated]
"Between two steady bass drones, a melody plays — but stray echoes bounce off the concert hall walls and must be ignored."
120b: k=1
See: A musical score with two sustained grey bass notes forming vertical pillars of sound, connected at top and bottom by azure harmonic tones. Between the pillars a melodic phrase plays in azure and silence. Outside, azure echoes scatter randomly.
Do: Listen only for the passage framed between the two bass drones, from the first connecting harmonic to the last. Transcribe that bounded passage and let the echoes fade.
Grid: Bass drones are grey columns, connecting harmonics are azure, the bounded passage is azure and black interior, echoes are scattered azure on a silent black background.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) size? Let's parse. Example Input lines (10 rows? Actually list): ". A . . . . . . . . ." ". . A . . . A . . . A" ". . . . . . . . . A A" ". . A . . . . . A . ." "A . X . . . . . X . ." ". . X . . A A . X . ." ". . X . . . . . X . ." ". . A . A . . . A . ." ". A . . . . . . A A ." That's 9 rows, each 11 columns? Let's count first row: ". A . . . . . . . . ." that's 11 entries. Output grid lines: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So transformation extracts a subgrid bounded by something: description mentions grey columns (X) as bass drones vertical pillars, azure (A) connecting harmonics at top and bottom, bounded passage azure and black interior, echoes scattered azure on black background. In input, we have X forming two vertical columns? Let's locate X positions. In input rows 5-8 have X patterns. Let's map coordinates (row, col). Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9 (1-index). Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. So two vertical columns of X at cols3 and 9 from rows5-7 (maybe also row4? row4 has ". . A . . . . . A . ." no X). So vertical pillars of grey (X) of height 3 rows. Connecting harmonics azure (A) at top and bottom of these columns: At top of column (row5) there is A at col1? Not at same column. Actually azure at top maybe row5 col1? Not aligning. Let's examine azure positions near columns: At row5 col1 is A, row5 col10 is .? row5 col? Not sure. But output grid seems to be a subgrid that includes the region between the two X columns, plus the X columns themselves? Output size 7 columns: maybe includes columns from first X to last X inclusive (col3 to col9) that's 7 columns (3,4,5,6,7,8,9). Yes 9-3+1=7. Output rows maybe from first X row (row5) to last X row (row7) plus maybe top and bottom connecting A rows? Output rows 5? Actually rows5-9? Let's see: rows5-9 inclusive is 5 rows (5,6,7,8,9) which matches output rows count 5. So output is subgrid rows5-9, cols3-9. Let's extract that subgrid from input to see if matches output. Rows5-9, cols3-9: Row5 (index5): columns 3-9: col3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 X => "X . . . . . X" Row6: col3 X,4 .,5 .,6 A,7 A,8 .,9 X => "X . . A A . X" Row7: col3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 X => "X . . . . . X" Row8: col3 A,4 .,5 A,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A => "A . A . . . A" Row9: col3 .,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A? Wait row9 is ". A . . . . . . A A ." columns: let's list: col1 .,2 A,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A,10 A,11 . . Actually row9 col3 is ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 ., col9 A, col? Wait we need up to col9. So row9 cols3-9: col3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A => ". . . . . . A". But output row5 is "A . . . . . A". Hmm mismatch. Our extracted rows: row5 X..., row6 X..AA.X, row7 X..., row8 A.A. ... [5380 chars truncated]
"The referee marks the playing field with sidelines and end zones — the ball may bounce into the stands, but only what happens on the field counts."
120b: k=2
See: A dark arena with a rectangular playing field marked by rigid grey sidelines running vertically and azure end-zone markers across the top and bottom, including corner flags. Azure objects appear both inside the field and scattered in the stands.
Do: Identify the official playing field — grey sidelines and azure end zones with corner flags — and report only the action within those boundaries. Everything in the stands is irrelevant.
Grid: The arena is black, sidelines are grey, end zones and corners are azure, the field interior has azure and black, and crowd noise (scattered azure) fills the surrounding black.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with colors: . black, A azure, X grey, etc. The description: "dark arena with rectangular playing field marked by rigid grey sidelines running vertically and azure end-zone markers across the top and bottom, including corner flags. Azure objects appear both inside the field and scattered in the stands. Identify the official playing field — grey sidelines and azure end zones with corner flags — and report only the action within those boundaries. Everything in the stands is irrelevant." Interpretation: Input grid contains a rectangular region defined by grey vertical lines (sidelines) and azure top/bottom rows (end zones) with corner flags (azure at corners). Within that rectangle, there are azure and maybe other colors (like X?). The output should be the subgrid inside that rectangle, maybe cropping to that region, preserving colors but maybe removing outer area (stands). Let's test with Example 1. Example1 Input grid size? Let's count rows: lines given: 9 rows? Actually list: Row1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . A . . . A . . . A" Row3: ". . . . . . . . . A A" Row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 11 columns? Let's count row1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." that's 11 entries (including spaces). Output grid: 5 rows, 7 columns. Let's locate grey sidelines: X appear vertical lines? In input, X appear at column 3? Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 1-11. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. So vertical lines of X at columns 3 and 9 from rows5-7 only, not full height. Maybe the rectangle is defined by the outermost X columns that appear in same rows? Let's also see azure end zones: top and bottom rows with A across? Row1 has A at col2 only. Row9 has A at col2 and col10,11? Actually row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => A at col2, col9, col10. Not full row. Hmm maybe rectangle defined by pattern: corners are A at four corners of rectangle (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). In example1 output, we have 5x7 grid. Let's see output content: Rows: 1: "A . . . . . A" 2: "X . . . . . X" 3: "X . . A A . X" 4: "X . . . . . X" 5: "A . A . . . A" So output includes A at corners (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). Also X vertical lines at columns 1 and 7? Actually output width 7, X at column1? Row2: X at col1 and col7. Row3: X at col1 and col7, plus A A in middle. Row4: X at col1 and col7. Row5: A at col1, col3, col7. Thus rectangle has X as vertical sidelines (left/right) and A as top/bottom rows (end zones). Inside there are A and maybe other colors. Thus rule: Find the smallest rec ... [6536 chars truncated]
"The eye wall of a rectangular storm holds calm and chaos inside — lightning flashes outside the wall are just atmospheric noise."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky with a rectangular eye wall: two vertical grey cloud columns and azure electrical arcs bridging them at top and bottom. Inside the eye, some azure lightning crackles amid black calm. Outside, stray azure lightning flashes randomly.
Do: Map the eye wall — the grey columns and their azure bridges — and capture only the weather within. The stray flashes beyond the wall are atmospheric scatter; discard them.
Grid: Sky is black, eye wall columns are grey, bridge arcs and corners are azure, interior has azure and black, exterior has scattered azure on black.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) and output grid. Let's parse. Example Input dimensions? Let's count rows. Provided lines: ". A . . . . . . . . ." ". . A . . . A . . . A" ". . . . . . . . . A A" ". . A . . . . . A . ." "A . X . . . . . X . ." ". . X . . A A . X . ." ". . X . . . . . X . ." ". . A . A . . . A . ." ". A . . . . . . A A ." That's 9 rows, each 11 columns? Let's count first row: ". A . . . . . . . . ." that's 11 entries (including spaces). Yes 11 columns. Output grid lines: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So transformation extracts something: maybe the "eye wall" rectangle defined by grey columns (X) and azure (A) bridges. In input, X appear forming vertical columns? Let's locate X positions. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9 (1-index). Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => X at col3 and col9. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. So there are two vertical columns of X at columns 3 and 9 rows 5-7 (maybe also row4? row4 has ". . A . . . . . A . ." no X). So rectangle defined by these columns and maybe top/bottom azure A bridging at top row? At row4 column? Row4 has A at col3? Actually row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." => A at col3 and col9. So top of rectangle: row4 has A at same columns as X below. Bottom maybe row8? Row8 has A at col5? Not same. Row9 has A at col2 and col9? Actually row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => A at col2, col9, col10. Not. But output grid seems to be a cropped region containing the rectangle: 5 rows x7 columns. Let's see which region corresponds. Output rows 5x7. Let's map input region maybe rows 4-8 and columns 3-9? That's 5 rows (4,5,6,7,8) and 7 columns (3-9). Let's extract that subgrid from input. Rows 4-8: Row4 (index4): ". . A . . . . . A . ." Columns 3-9: col3=A,4=.,5=.,6=.,7=.,8=.,9= A => sequence: A . . . . . A Matches output row1: "A . . . . . A". Good. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Cols3-9: col3=X,4=.,5=.,6=.,7=.,8=.,9= X => "X . . . . . X" matches output row2. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." Cols3-9: col3=X,4=.,5=.,6=A,7=A,8=.,9= X => "X . . A A . X" matches output row3. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." Cols3-9: "X . . . . . X" matches output row4. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." Cols3-9: col3=A,4=.,5=A,6=.,7=.,8=.,9= A => "A . A . . . A" matches output row5. Great! So rule: find the minimal bounding rectangle that encloses all X (grey) cells? In this case X columns at 3 and 9 rows 5-7, but also maybe X elsewhere? Only those. The rectangle includes also A at top row (row4) bridging columns 3 and 9. So rectangle defined by the outermost X columns and the topmost and bottommost rows that contain X? Actually topmost row containing X is row5, but rectangle includes row4 (one row above) because there are A bridging at same columns. So maybe rectangle defined by th ... [4282 chars truncated]
"A stone doorframe stands in a field of scattered blue tiles — step through and see only the room beyond."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark plaza littered with blue mosaic tiles. In it stands a rectangular doorframe: grey stone columns on left and right, with blue capstones and threshold tiles connecting them at top and bottom. Through the frame, a room with blue and dark tiles is visible.
Do: Find the stone doorframe — its grey columns and blue capstones — and extract only the view within the frame, from capstone to threshold, column to column. Ignore the scattered tiles in the plaza.
Grid: The plaza is black with scattered azure tiles, columns are grey, capstones and thresholds are azure, the room interior has azure and black cells.
"A fortress stands in no-man's land littered with spent flares — only what lies within the fortress walls matters to the general."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark battlefield with spent azure flares scattered across it. A rectangular fortress rises from the field: grey rampart walls on left and right, azure watchtowers at the corners and azure battlements along the top and bottom edges. Inside, azure signal fires and dark ground.
Do: Locate the fortress by its grey ramparts and azure watchtowers. Extract the fortress footprint — everything from tower to tower, rampart to rampart. Leave the battlefield and its spent flares behind.
Grid: Battlefield is black, ramparts are grey columns, watchtowers and battlements are azure, interior has azure and black, spent flares are scattered azure outside.
"The proscenium arch frames the stage — audience members wearing blue scarves are not part of the play."
120b: fail
See: A dark theater: a rectangular proscenium arch with grey curtain borders on left and right and azure gilded trim across the top and bottom, including ornate azure corner pieces. On stage, azure props sit on a dark floor. In the audience, azure scarves are scattered randomly.
Do: Find the proscenium arch — grey curtain borders and azure gilded trim — and capture only the stage within. The audience and their scarves are outside the frame and excluded.
Grid: The theater is black, curtain borders are grey, gilded trim and corners are azure, stage has azure and black, audience scarves are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule. From description: find proscenium arch: grey curtain borders and azure gilded trim. In grid, grey = X, azure = A. So we need to capture only the stage within the frame defined by X border and A trim? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 9 rows? Actually given lines: ". A . . . . . . . . ." ". . A . . . A . . . A" ". . . . . . . . . A A" ". . A . . . . . A . ." "A . X . . . . . X . ." ". . X . . A A . X . ." ". . X . . . . . X . ." ". . A . A . . . A . ." ". A . . . . . . A A ." That's 9 rows, each 12 columns? Let's count first row: ". A . . . . . . . . . ." that's 12. Output grid is 5 rows x 7 columns: "A . . . . . A" "X . . . . . X" "X . . A A . X" "X . . . . . X" "A . A . . . A" So output seems to be a cropped region containing the "stage". The stage appears to be region bounded by X's (grey) and A's (azure) as border? Let's locate in input where there is a rectangular frame of X and A. Look at input rows 5-8 maybe. Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." has A at col1, X at col3, X at col9. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." has X at col3, A at col6-7, X at col9. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." similar. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." has A at col3, A at col5, A at col9. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." has A at col2, A at col9-10. Seems like a frame: corners maybe A at (row5,col1) top-left? But not rectangular. Maybe the rule: find the smallest rectangle that contains all X cells? Then output that rectangle, preserving A and X inside, but replace other colors? Let's test. In example1, X positions: (row5,col3), (row5,col9), (row6,col3), (row6,col9), (row7,col3), (row7,col9), (row8?, none), (row9?, none). So X's form vertical lines at col3 and col9 rows5-7. Also there is X maybe elsewhere? That's it. The smallest rectangle covering all X's would be rows5-7, cols3-9. That's 3 rows x 7 cols. But output is 5 rows x7 cols, includes rows4-8? Actually output rows correspond maybe to rows4-8? Let's see output row1 "A . . . . . A". That could correspond to row4 columns? Row4 input: ". . A . . . . . A . ." columns? At col? Row4 has A at col3 and col9. If we take columns 3-9 inclusive, row4 col3 = A, col4-8 = . . . . ., col9 = A. That matches output row1: A . . . . . A (7 columns). Yes! So output includes row4 (above X top) and row8 (below X bottom) as well. So rectangle rows4-8, cols3-9 gives 5 rows x7 cols. That matches output. Thus rule: find the rectangular region bounded by the outermost X's (grey) and include one extra row/col of surrounding azure? Actually the rectangle includes the X's and also the outermost A's that form the "gilded trim". In example1, the A's at top row4 col3 and col9 are part of frame. Also bottom row8 col3 and col9 are A's. Also leftmost column maybe A at row5 col1? Not included. So the frame is defined by X vertical lines and A at top/bottom of those lines? Actually the rectangle is defined by the outermost X columns (col3 and col9) and the outermost rows that contain X (row5-7) ... [9252 chars truncated]
"A trellis stands in a wildflower meadow — only the vine growing within the trellis frame should be harvested."
120b: k=1
See: A dark garden bed with azure wildflowers scattered randomly. A rectangular trellis is planted in it: grey wooden stakes on left and right, with azure blossoms woven along the top and bottom rails and clustered at the corners. Inside the trellis, azure blooms and dark soil.
Do: Identify the trellis frame — grey stakes and azure-flowered rails — and harvest only what grows within its bounds. Leave the meadow wildflowers untouched.
Grid: Garden bed is black, stakes are grey, rail blossoms and corners are azure, interior has azure and black, wildflowers are scattered azure outside.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1 (example) and output grid given. Let's parse. Example Input dimensions? Let's count rows: appears 9 rows? Actually list: Row1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . A . . . A . . . A" Row3: ". . . . . . . . . A A" Row4: ". . A . . . . . A . ." Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." So 9 rows, 11 columns? Let's count row1: ". A . . . . . . . . ." that's 11 entries. Good. Output grid: Rows: 1: "A . . . . . A" 2: "X . . . . . X" 3: "X . . A A . X" 4: "X . . . . . X" 5: "A . A . . . A" That's 5 rows, 7 columns. So rule extracts a subgrid (trellis) defined by grey X stakes forming rectangle, with azure A rails top/bottom and corners. Inside rectangle includes A and . (black). Output seems to be the interior? Let's examine input to locate rectangle of X forming vertical lines? In input, there are X's forming a vertical column? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 1-9, cols 1-11. Mark X positions: Row5 col3? Row5: "A . X . . . . . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row6: ". . X . . A A . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row7: ". . X . . . . . X . ." => col3 X, col9 X. Row8: ". . A . A . . . A . ." => no X. Row9: ". A . . . . . . A A ." => no X. Also row6 col? there is X at col3 and col9. So vertical lines at col3 and col9 from rows5-7 (maybe also row? row5-7). That's a rectangle of width (col3 to col9) and height rows5-7? But also top and bottom rails of A? Let's see A positions at corners: row5 col1 A, row5 col11? row5 col11 . not A. Row5 col? Actually corners maybe at (row5,col3?) but that's X. Hmm. Look at A's forming top and bottom rails: Row5 has A at col1, also maybe at col? Row5 col1 A, col? row5 col? there is also A at col? row5 col? after X's there is . . . . X . . So not. Row6 has A at col6 and col7 (two adjacent). Row7 none. Row8 has A at col3? row8 col3 A, col5 A, col9 A. Row9 has A at col2, col9, col10. But output grid is 5x7. Let's see which region corresponds. Output row1: "A . . . . . A". That matches maybe top rail of rectangle: left corner A, right corner A, interior . . . . . . .? Actually there are 7 columns, corners at col1 and col7 are A. In input, where are two A's horizontally aligned with rectangle? Look at row5: A at col1, X at col3, X at col9, maybe A at col11? Not. Row5 col1 A, col? maybe col11? not. Row6: there are A at col6 and col7 (adjacent). Not corners. Row8: A at col3, col5, col9. Row9: A at col2, col9, col10. Maybe rectangle defined by X's as vertical sides, and A's as top and bottom rails connecting them. Let's find rectangle where top rail is a row of A's between two X columns. Look for a row where there are A's at positions aligning with X columns? For rectangle, top rail would be A's at columns between left X and right X inclusive? In example, left X column is 3, right X column is 9. Top rail maybe row5? Row5 has X at col3 and col9, but also ... [6725 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black background with a single irregular closed shape made of one non-black color. The shape resembles a rough rectangle or polygon outlined in colored pixels, with a hollow interior of black pixels. The shape has a clearly identifiable bottom row (its lowest horizontal edge) and a top row (its highest horizontal edge).
Do: Identify the bottom row of the colored shape — this is the anchor row and does not move. For every other row of the shape, count how many rows above the bottom row it is; call this distance d. Shift all colored pixels in that row exactly d cells to the left. Pixels that would shift to negative column indices are discarded. All other cells remain black. The vertical positions of all rows stay the same; only horizontal positions change.
Grid: The grid dimensions remain identical to the input. The background is black (.). Only one non-black color is present. The shape occupies a contiguous vertical span of rows, and the transformation only affects columns within those rows.
"A flag unfurling in the wind, anchored at its bottom edge"
120b: k=1
See: Against a night sky, a colored banner hangs in stillness — its shape an irregular pennant stitched from a single hue, hollow at its heart like a window frame. The banner's bottom hem is nailed firmly to an invisible pole.
Do: A steady wind blows from the right. The bottom hem, nailed down, holds fast. But every row of fabric above it catches the breeze — and the higher it flutters from the anchor, the further the wind carries it leftward. Each row sails left by exactly as far as it stands above the grounded hem, as though the wind grows stronger with altitude.
Grid: The night sky keeps its darkness and its dimensions. Only the single-colored banner moves — its hem stays planted while the rest streams leftward like a flag caught in a rising gale.
We need to understand transformation. The description: a banner shape irregular pennant stitched from a single hue, hollow at its heart like a window frame. Bottom hem is nailed to invisible pole. Wind from right, bottom hem stays, each row above moves left by exactly as far as it stands above the grounded hem (i.e., distance from bottom row). So basically shift each row left by number of rows from bottom of shape? Let's examine example. Input shape: color R forms a shape like a hollow rectangle? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 11 rows, 13 columns? Actually given 13 columns. Let's index rows 0-10. Rows with R: Row3: columns 4-8 (5 Rs) Row4: col4 R, col8 R (others .) Row5: col4-5 R,R, col8 R Row6: col5 R, col8-9 R,R Row7: col5 R, col8 R Row8: col5-9 R (5 Rs) So shape is like a flag with bottom row row8 (index 8) having 5 Rs. The bottom hem is row8? Actually bottom of shape is row8 (since rows 0-2 empty, row9-10 empty). The bottom hem is anchored, not moving. Rows above shift left by distance equal to vertical distance from bottom row? Let's test. Output rows: Row3 (original row3) becomes shifted left by? In output row3 (index3) we have R R R R . . . . . . . . . (4 Rs at cols0-3). Original row3 had Rs at cols4-8 (5 Rs). After shift left by 4? Actually bottom row is row8. Distance from row3 to row8 = 5 rows (8-3=5). If shift left by 5, original cols4-8 shift to -1 to 3 (some off-grid). But output shows Rs at 0-3 (4 Rs). Not matching. Maybe shift left by number of rows above bottom hem (i.e., row index relative to bottom of shape's top? Let's compute shift for each row based on its row number relative to bottom row of shape (row8). Row8 stays same (no shift). Row7 shift left by 1? Output row7 (index7) has . . . . R . . . R . . . . . Let's see original row7 had Rs at col5 and col8. After shift left by 1, they'd be at col4 and col7. Output row7 shows R at col4? Actually output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . . ." That's R at col4 and col8? Wait count: positions 0-12. Let's list: 0.,1.,2.,3.,4R,5.,6.,7.,8R,9.,10.,11.,12. So Rs at col4 and col8. Original had col5 and col8. So left shift of 1 moves col5->4, col8->7 but output shows col8 unchanged. So not simple shift. Maybe the shape is being "sheared" such that each row is shifted left by its distance from bottom *but also the shape is hollow, so interior spaces become filled? Let's examine row6 (index6). Original row6: col5 R, col8-9 R,R. Output row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." That's Rs at col3, col6, col7. Original col5->3 shift 2? col8->6 shift2, col9->7 shift2. So shift left by 2 for row6 (distance from bottom row8 is 2). That matches: row6 distance = 8-6=2, shift left 2. Good. Row5 (index5) distance 3. Original row5: col4-5 R,R, col8 R. Shift left 3 => col1-2, col5. Output row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." That's Rs at col1,2,5. Yes matches! Row4 distance 4. Original row4: col4 R, col8 R. Shift left 4 => col0,4. Output row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." That's Rs at c ... [4025 chars truncated]
"A cell's membrane shears under directional stress, its base rooted to the substrate while its upper structures lean away like windblown cilia"
120b: k=1
See: A single colored organism clings to a dark void, its body a hollow membrane of pigmented pixels enclosing an empty interior.
Do: The organism's lowest foothold grips the surface immovably. Each layer of tissue above that anchor point stretches laterally under increasing cytoplasmic pressure — the farther from the root, the greater the displacement, as if an invisible current were combing the cell's body sideways from base to tip.
Grid: The dark void remains. The organism's color and vertical span are preserved, but its silhouette leans as upper layers migrate horizontally, each row displaced proportionally to its height above the anchored base.
We need to understand transformation. Input shows a shape of orange O forming a hollow membrane? Let's examine example 1: Input shape is red R forming a hollow shape? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 11 rows, 13 columns? Actually given 11 rows, each row 13 columns. The shape appears like a hollow rectangle? Let's visualize rows 4-9 (0-index?). Row indices starting 0. Rows: 0-2 empty. Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 R's) -> "R R R R R" Row4: col4 R, col8 R (with spaces between) Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col7 R (maybe) Row6: col5 R, col8 R, col9 R? Wait row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." => col5 R, col8 R, col9 R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => col5 R, col9 R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9 R. So shape is like a diagonal? Actually looks like a shape that is leaning rightwards already? Output shows shape shifted leftwards? Let's see output rows 3-8: Row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => columns 0-3 R? Actually row3 output: first four columns R then rest empty. So the top row of shape moved to leftmost columns. Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => R at col0 and col4. Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => R at col1,2 and col5. Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => R at col3 and col6,7. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => R at col4 and col8. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => R at col5-9 (same as input row8). So shape appears to have been "leaned" leftwards, anchored at bottom row (row8) unchanged, and each row above shifted left by amount proportional to distance from bottom? Let's compute shift: bottom row (row8) shift 0. Row7 shift 1 left? Input row7 had R at col5 and col9. Output row7 has R at col4 and col8 (shift -1). Row6 input had R at col5,8,9. Output row6 has R at col3,6,7 (shift -2). Row5 input had R at col4,5,7. Output row5 has R at col1,2,5 (shift -3). Row4 input had R at col4,8. Output row4 has R at col0,4 (shift -4). Row3 input had R at col4-8. Output row3 has R at col0-3 (shift -4? Actually input col4-8 (5 cells). Output col0-3 (4 cells). That's shift -4 but also width changed? Let's compute shift per row: shift = bottom row index - current row index? bottom row index = 8. For row7 (index7) shift = 8-7 =1 left. Row6 shift=2 left. Row5 shift=3 left. Row4 shift=4 left. Row3 shift=5 left? But we observed shift 4 left for row3? Let's verify: Input row3 col4-8 -> after shift 5 left would be col -1 to 3 (invalid). So maybe shape truncated at left edge, cells that would go out of bounds are dropped. So row3 after shift 5 left would have cells at col -1,0,1,2,3; col -1 dropped, leaving col0-3 (4 cells). That matches output row3: col0-3 R. So rule: anchor at bottommost row of shape (lowest row containing the organism). That row stays same. For each row above, shift left by number of rows difference (distance from anchor). If shift would move beyond left edge, cells are clipped. Thus transformation is a leftward "lean" with base anchored. Now test input: shape of orange O similar but maybe diffe ... [3138 chars truncated]
"A galaxy sheared by tidal forces from a passing cluster — its core holds position while outer spiral arms are stretched and dragged sideways by increasing gravitational gradient"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored nebula drifts in dark space — a hollow structure of one hue with void inside its shell.
Do: The nebula's densest edge (bottom) resists the tidal pull. Each shell layer further from that anchor is swept sideways by the gradient — one parsec of drift per layer of distance from the core edge. The structure elongates into a tidal tail.
Grid: Dark space remains. The nebula's color and vertical layers persist, but its profile becomes a slanted streak, anchored at the bottom and fanning outward at the top.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid shows a shape of red R forming a hollow structure? Let's visualize: Input example 1: rows 0-10 (11 rows) columns 0-12 (13 columns). The red shape appears like a hollow diamond? Actually pattern: rows 3-9 have R forming a shape: row3: columns4-8 (5 Rs). row4: col4 R, col8 R (with spaces). row5: col4-5 R,R then col8 R. row6: col5 R, col8-9 R,R. row7: col5 R, col8 R. row8: col5-9 R (5 Rs). This looks like a hollow shape with a vertical axis? The output moves shape leftwards and downwards? Let's compare output rows: row3 output: R R R R . . . . . . . . . (four Rs at cols0-3). row4: R . . . R . . . . . . . . (R at col0 and col4). row5: . R R . . R . . . . . . . (Rs at col1,2,5). row6: . . . R . . R R . . . . . (R at col3,6,7). row7: . . . . R . . . R . . . . (R at col4,8). row8: . . . . . R R R R R . . . (Rs at col5-9). So shape has been sheared to the right as we go up? Actually original shape anchored at bottom? In input, bottom row (row8) has 5 Rs contiguous (col5-9). In output, bottom row (row8) same contiguous 5 Rs but shifted right by 0? Wait input bottom row row8 had Rs at col5-9. Output row8 also at col5-9. So bottom unchanged. Row7 input had Rs at col5 and col8? Actually row7 input: ". . . . . R . . O O . ."? Wait that's test input. For example, row7 input: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ."? Let's check: row7 (index7) from example input: ". . . . . R . . R R . . .". Yes Rs at col5, col8, col9. Output row7: Rs at col4 and col8. So changed. Observation: The shape appears to be sheared leftwards as we go up: bottom row unchanged, each row above shifted left by 1 relative to row below? Let's see: bottom row (row8) Rs at 5-9. Row7 output Rs at 4 and 8 (two Rs). Not exactly shift left by 1 of each element? Input row7 had Rs at 5,8,9. Output row7 has Rs at 4,8. So leftmost moved left 1, rightmost (col9) disappeared? Actually shape is hollow; maybe the rule is to "rotate" shape 90 degrees? Not. Let's compute transformation: It seems they are "tilting" the shape so that the left edge becomes vertical? The description: "nebula's densest edge (bottom) resists the tidal pull. Each shell layer further from that anchor is swept sideways by the gradient — one parsec of drift per layer of distance from the core edge. The structure elongates into a tidal tail." So bottom edge anchored, each layer above shifts left by one column per layer distance from bottom. So topmost layer shifts left many columns, maybe until hitting left border. In example, distance from bottom row (row8) to row7 is 1, shift left 1. Row6 distance 2 shift left 2. Row5 distance 3 shift left 3. Row4 distance 4 shift left 4. Row3 distance 5 shift left 5. Let's test: Input row7 had Rs at cols5,8,9. Shift left 1 => cols4,7,8. Output row7 has Rs at 4 and 8 (col7 missing). So maybe also shape is "hollow" and interior removed? Actually original row7 had three Rs, but after shift left 1, we would have three Rs. Output only two. Which one disappe ... [5377 chars truncated]
"A sail luffing as the boom holds fast — the foot of the sail stays taut along the boom while each higher batten flutters further downwind"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored sail hangs in a dark seascape — a hollow canvas of one hue with empty air pocketed inside.
Do: The foot of the sail, lashed to the boom, does not move. Each horizontal batten above it catches more wind and swings further to leeward — one canvas-width per batten above the foot. The sail billows into a diagonal profile.
Grid: The dark sea and sky remain. The sail keeps its color and height, but each horizontal strip shifts progressively from the anchored foot, creating a wind-sheared silhouette.
We need to understand transformation. Input grid shows a shape of orange O forming a sail? Let's examine example 1: Input has red R shape. Output shows same shape but shifted diagonally? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-10, columns 0-12 (13 columns). Input rows 3-9 contain shape. Input shape (R) pattern: Row3: cols4-8 (5 Rs) (since . . . . R R R R R . . . .) Actually columns 4-8 inclusive (5). Row4: col4 R, col8 R (two Rs). Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col7 R (positions?). Row5 line: . . . . R R . . R . . . . => cols4,5,7. Row6: . . . . . R . . R R . . . => cols5,8,9. Row7: . . . . . R . . . R . . . => cols5,9. Row8: . . . . . R R R R R . . . => cols5-9. So shape is like a sail with foot at bottom? Actually bottom row (row8) is full line of Rs from col5-9. The foot maybe bottom? In description foot anchored, batten above shift rightwards each row up. Output shape: Row3: R R R R . . . . . . . . . => cols0-3? Wait output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." That's row index 3 (same as input row3). So the topmost horizontal strip (row3) originally had 5 Rs from col4-8, now shifted left? Actually now at cols0-3 (4 Rs). Hmm. Row4 output: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => Rs at col0 and col4. Input row4 had Rs at col4 and col8. So leftmost moved to col0, rightmost moved to col4 (shift left by 4). Row5 output: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => Rs at col1,2,5. Input row5 had at col4,5,7. So shift left by 3? Row6 output: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => Rs at col3,6,7. Input row6 had at col5,8,9. Shift left by 2. Row7 output: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4,8. Input row7 had at col5,9. Shift left by1. Row8 output: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => Rs at col5-9 unchanged (shift 0). So indeed each row above bottom shifts left progressively more: bottom row unchanged, each row above shifts left by (bottom row index - current row index). That matches description: each horizontal batten above foot catches more wind and swings further to leeward — one canvas-width per batten above the foot. So foot is bottom row of shape (the anchored row). Each row above moves left by one more column per row. Thus transformation: Identify contiguous region of a single non-black color (maybe any color) that forms a shape with a bottommost row (the foot) that is a solid horizontal line? Actually shape may be any shape but we shift each row upward (north) leftwards? Actually shift leftwards (west) by offset equal to distance from bottom row of shape. Implementation: For each row containing the shape, compute shift = (maxRow - row). Then move all colored cells in that row left by shift columns, preserving relative positions, and fill vacated cells with black '.'. Also shape's color remains same. Check row3 shift = maxRow (8) - 3 =5, but we observed shift of 4? Wait row3 shift 5 would move col4-8 left by5 => cols -1 to 3 (some out of bounds). Actually output row3 had Rs at cols0-3 (4 cells). Input had 5 cells. So shift 4? Let's comput ... [4890 chars truncated]
"A signal passing through a delay line — the ground reference pin holds steady while each successive tap introduces more phase shift, staggering the waveform sideways on the oscilloscope"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored waveform trace sits on a dark oscilloscope screen — a hollow signal outline in one hue with baseline inside.
Do: The ground tap (bottom trace) stays locked to the trigger. Each higher tap in the delay chain introduces one additional unit of phase lag, shifting that trace segment sideways on the display. The composite waveform becomes a staircase of increasing delay.
Grid: The dark screen remains. The trace color and vertical channels are preserved, but horizontal position shifts incrementally with each channel above the reference, producing a diagonally skewed readout.
We need to infer transformation rule from example. Input grid 11 rows? Actually example input has 11 rows, each 13 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13 columns. 11 rows. In example, there is a shape of red trace forming a hollow outline? Input shows a shape: rows 4-9 contain R pattern forming a shape like a rectangle with missing interior? Let's visualize coordinates (row index starting 0). Input rows 3-8 have R pattern. Row3 (index3): columns 4-8 are R (5 Rs). Row4: col4 R, col8 R (with a dot at 5-7?). Actually row4: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." So R at col4 and col8. Row5: ". . . . R R . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4,5,8. Row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." => Rs at col5,8,9. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => Rs at col5,9. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => Rs at col5-9. So shape is like a diagonal staircase? Output shows same shape but shifted leftwards? Let's see output rows. Output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => Rs at col0-3. That's shift left by 4 columns compared to input row3 (col4-8). Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => Rs at col0 and col4. Input had at col4 and col8. So left shift of 4 for first R, second R shift left 4 as well (col8->col4). Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => Rs at col1,2,5. Input had col4,5,8. So shift left 3? Wait col4->1 shift -3, col5->2 shift -3, col8->5 shift -3. So shift amount varies per row? Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => Rs at col3,6,7. Input had col5,8,9. Shift -2. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4,8. Input had col5,9. Shift -1. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => Rs at col5-9 same as input (no shift). So pattern: each row lower (higher index) shift less left, culminating in no shift at bottom row of shape. Thus transformation: shift each row of the colored shape left by an amount equal to (some function of vertical distance from bottom of shape). The description: "ground tap (bottom trace) stays locked to the trigger. Each higher tap in the delay chain introduces one additional unit of phase lag, shifting that trace segment sideways on the display. The composite waveform becomes a staircase of increasing delay." So bottom row unchanged, each row above shifted left by 1 more unit relative to row below. So shift amount = (bottom row index - current row index) ??? Actually bottom row (row8) shift 0. Row7 shift 1 left. Row6 shift 2 left. Row5 shift 3 left. Row4 shift 4 left. Row3 shift 4? Wait row3 shift 4 left (col4->0). That's shift 4, but according to pattern should be 5? Let's compute distances: bottom row index = 8. Row7 index 7 distance 1 shift 1 left (true). Row6 distance 2 shift 2 left (true). Row5 distance 3 shift 3 left (true). Row4 distance 4 shift 4 left (true). Row3 distance 5 shift 4 left (but expected 5). However row3 shift is 4 not 5. Let's verify row3 input had Rs at col4-8 (5 cells). Output row3 has Rs at col0-3 (4 cells). Wait shape width changed? Input row3 had 5 Rs contiguous. Out ... [3780 chars truncated]
"The Tower of Babel mid-collapse — divine wrath pins the foundation stones while each higher course of masonry is flung further from true by an unseen hand"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored tower rises from a dark plain — a hollow monolith of one hue with emptiness within its walls.
Do: The foundation course is spared and stays in place. Each course of stone above it is cast sideways by a force proportional to its hubris — one stone's width per level above the base. The tower shears into a cascading ruin, its summit displaced the farthest.
Grid: The dark plain endures. The tower's color and height survive, but its profile becomes a diagonal collapse anchored at the foundation, each level offset further than the last.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a "tower" of a single color (R in example) on dark plain (.) The tower is a shape: looks like a hollow square? Let's visualize example 1 input: rows 0-10 (11 rows). The tower appears rows 3-9 columns 4-8 maybe. Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows starting 0. Row3: columns 4-8 are R R R R R (5) Row4: col4 R, col8 R (others .) Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col7 R (since pattern "R R . . R") Actually row5: "R R . . R . . . . . . ."? Wait given: ". . . . R R . . R . . . ." That's columns: 4 R,5 R,6 .,7 .,8 R, rest . So shape is like a hollow rectangle with some interior? Row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." columns: 5 R,8 R,9 R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." columns 5 R,9 R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." columns 5-9 all R. So shape is like a pyramid? Actually looks like a diagonal? Let's see output: The tower collapsed diagonally to left? Output rows 3-8 show R's shifted leftwards gradually. Output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." (four Rs at cols0-3). Input row3 had five Rs at cols4-8. So they moved leftwards by 4? Actually base row (row8) unchanged? Output row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." same as input row8. So bottom row unchanged (foundation stays). Row7 output: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." which matches input row7 but shifted left by 4? Input row7 had Rs at cols5 and 9. Output row7 has Rs at col4 and 8? Wait output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." That's cols4 and 8. Input row7: cols5 and 9. So shifted left by 1. Row6 output: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." Input row6: cols5,8,9. Output row6: cols3,6,7? Actually output row6: positions: col3 R, col6 R, col7 R. Input row6: col5 R, col8 R, col9 R. So shift left by 2 for first, 2 for second? Let's compute: col5->col3 shift -2, col8->col6 shift -2, col9->col7 shift -2. Row5 output: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." Input row5: cols4,5,8. Output row5: cols1,2,5. Shifts: col4->1 (-3), col5->2 (-3), col8->5 (-3). Row4 output: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." Input row4: cols4 and 8. Output row4: cols0 and 4. Shifts: -4 each. Row3 output: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." Input row3: cols4-8 (5). Output row3: cols0-3 (4). Hmm shift -4 for first? Actually mapping: Input col4->output col0 (-4), col5->1 (-4), col6->2 (-4), col7->3 (-4), col8 disappears? Actually output only 4 Rs, not 5. So top row lost one cell? Wait shape maybe triangular? Let's examine shape: It seems like a hollow square with missing top right? Actually input top row of tower (row3) has 5 Rs contiguous. Output row3 has 4 Rs contiguous starting at col0. So the rightmost column maybe fell off because tower width reduces as we go up? The rule: each level above base shifts left by number of levels above base (i.e., offset = level index). Base (row8) offset 0. Row7 offset 1 left. Row6 offset 2 left. Row5 offset 3 left. Row4 offset 4 left. Row3 offset 5 left? But we observed offset 4 for row4, offset 3 for row5, offset 2 for row6, offset 1 for row7, offset 4 for row3? Let's compute levels: base ... [5879 chars truncated]
"A chorus line performing a ripple — the dancer at the end of the line stays planted while each successive dancer peels away one more step, creating a cascading diagonal wave"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored chorus line stands on a dark stage — a hollow formation in one costume color with open space between the dancers.
Do: The anchor dancer at the bottom of the formation stays rooted. Each dancer above peels one additional step sideways — the second dancer shifts one, the third shifts two, and so on. The line transforms from a column into a sweeping diagonal.
Grid: The dark stage persists. The dancers' color and vertical spacing remain, but horizontal positions cascade progressively from the fixed anchor, drawing a diagonal line across the floor.
We need to understand transformation. Input example shows a shape: a hollow formation? Let's examine example 1 input and output. Input grid 11 rows, 13 columns? Actually given 13 columns. Let's index rows 0-10, columns 0-12. Input rows with R pattern: Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 Rs) (positions 4,5,6,7,8) Row4: col4 R, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 R (so R at 4 and 8) Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col6 ., col7 ., col8 R (R at 4,5,8) Row6: col5 R, col8 R, col9 R? Wait row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." So columns: 5=R, 8=R,9=R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => col5=R, col9=R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => cols5-9 all R. So shape is like a hollow diamond? Actually looks like a "hollow formation" maybe a column? Let's view as column of Rs? The anchor dancer at bottom stays rooted. Each dancer above peels one additional step sideways — second dancer shifts one, third shifts two, etc. So we take the column of Rs (vertical line) and shift each row progressively to the left? In output, we see Rs moved leftwards forming diagonal. Let's examine output rows: Row3 output: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => Rs at cols0-3? Actually row3 output: first four columns Rs then rest empty. So original row3 had Rs at cols4-8 (5 Rs). They moved left by 4? Wait they now occupy cols0-3 (4 Rs). Not same count. Let's compare shape. Better to map each original R cell to new location. Let's list original coordinates (row, col): (3,4)(3,5)(3,6)(3,7)(3,8) (4,4)(4,8) (5,4)(5,5)(5,8) (6,5)(6,8)(6,9) (7,5)(7,9) (8,5)(8,6)(8,7)(8,8)(8,9) Now output coordinates: Row3: (3,0)(3,1)(3,2)(3,3) Row4: (4,0)(4,4) Row5: (5,1)(5,2)(5,5) Row6: (6,3)(6,6)(6,7) Row7: (7,4)(7,8) Row8: (8,5)(8,6)(8,7)(8,8)(8,9) Observations: The bottom row (row8) unchanged (same positions). Row7 shifted right by? Original row7 had Rs at col5 and 9. Output row7 has at col4 and 8 (shift left by 1). Row6 original at 5,8,9 -> output at 3,6,7 (shift left by 2 for first, left by 2 for second? Actually 8->6 shift -2, 9->7 shift -2). Row5 original at 4,5,8 -> output at 1,2,5 (shifts: 4->1 (-3),5->2 (-3),8->5 (-3)). Row4 original at 4,8 -> output at 0,4 (shifts: -4, -4). Row3 original at 4-8 -> output at 0-3 (shifts: -4, -4, -4, -4, -4? Actually 8->3 shift -5). Wait row3 had 5 cells, output has 4 cells. The rightmost cell maybe dropped because shift would go out of bounds? Let's compute shift amount per row: seems to increase as we go up: bottom row shift 0, row7 shift -1, row6 shift -2, row5 shift -3, row4 shift -4, row3 shift -4? maybe -5 but truncated. Pattern: each row above moves left by one more column than row below. Anchor at bottom stays same. So shift = (bottom_row_index - current_row_index) * 1? Actually bottom row index 8. For row7 (index 7) shift = 1 left. Row6 shift = 2 left. Row5 shift = 3 left. Row4 shift = 4 left. Row3 shift = 5 left? But we see shift maybe 5 left but truncated causing loss of rightmost cell. Let's test: original row3 col4 would shift to ... [4900 chars truncated]
"A cliff face undergoing lateral shear — the bedrock stratum holds firm while each sedimentary layer above it is displaced further by tectonic creep"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored rock formation stands against a dark void — a hollow outcrop of one mineral hue with an eroded hollow inside.
Do: The lowest stratum is locked into the bedrock and does not move. Each successive layer above it undergoes one additional unit of lateral shear, as slow tectonic stress displaces higher strata further from the original alignment. The cliff becomes a leaning stack of offset layers.
Grid: The dark void remains. The formation's mineral color and vertical layering are preserved, but its cross-section shows a diagonal offset — each stratum shifted incrementally further than the one below, anchored at the base.
We need to understand transformation. Input shows a shape of a mineral (color R in example, O in test). It's a solid shape with a hollow interior? Let's examine example 1 input shape: a 5x? Actually grid 11 rows, 13 columns. The shape appears as a "rock formation" maybe a filled shape with a hollow interior? Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows index 0-10, columns 0-12. Rows 3-9 contain R shape. Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 contiguous). Row4: col4 R, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 R (so edges). Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col6 ., col7 ., col8 R. Row6: col5 R, col8 R, col9 R? Wait row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." Actually row6: columns? Let's count: row6 string: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." That's 13 entries. So col5=R, col8=R, col9=R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => col5=R, col9=R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9 all R. So shape is like a diamond? Actually looks like a shape of a "rock formation" maybe a "hollow outcrop" meaning a shape with a hole inside? Let's view shape: It seems like a filled shape with a hollow interior? Let's draw coordinates. I'll create matrix of R positions: Row3: 4-8 Row4: 4,8 Row5: 4,5,8 Row6:5,8,9 Row7:5,9 Row8:5-9 This shape is like a diagonal? Not symmetrical. Now output: The shape is shifted leftwards gradually upward? Let's see output rows. Output rows 3-8: Row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => columns 0-3 R? Actually row3 output: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." So R at cols0-3. Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => R at col0 and col4. Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => R at col1,2,5. Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => R at col3,6,7. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => R at col4,8. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => R at col5-9. So the shape appears to have been sheared to the right? Actually original shape had leftmost column at col4 (row3). After transformation, leftmost column moves leftwards? Wait original leftmost col is 4 (row3). Output leftmost col is 0 (row3). That's shift left by 4. Row4 leftmost col 4 -> output col0 shift left 4. Row5 leftmost col4 -> output col1 shift left 3? Actually row5 leftmost col4 becomes col1 shift -3. Row6 leftmost col5 becomes col3 shift -2. Row7 leftmost col5 becomes col4 shift -1. Row8 leftmost col5 becomes col5 shift 0. Thus each successive row above base shifts left more (i.e., higher rows shift more left). The base row (row8) stays same. So the rule: anchor bottom row (lowest occupied row) unchanged; each row above moves left by (distance from bottom) units? Let's compute offset = (bottom_row_index - current_row_index). For row8 (bottom) offset 0, row7 offset 1 left shift 1, row6 offset 2 left shift 2, row5 offset 3 left shift 3, row4 offset 4 left shift 4, row3 offset 5 left shift 5? But we observed row3 shift 4 not 5. Let's verify bottom row index = 8. Row3 index 3 offset = 5. But shift observed 4. Hmm maybe bottom row is row8 (index 8). Row3 shift 4, not 5. Let's compute offset = (bottom_row_index - current_row_in ... [5129 chars truncated]
"A layered pastry topples in slow motion off the edge of a plate, each tier sliding further than the one beneath it"
120b: k=3
See: A single colored pastry form sits on a dark countertop — a hollow crust of one hue enclosing an empty filling space.
Do: The bottom crust layer stays stuck to the plate. Each successive layer above it slides sideways as if gravity were pulling it off the edge — the higher the layer, the farther it slides. The pastry collapses into a leaning cascade, each tier offset by one more step than the tier below.
Grid: The countertop stays dark. The pastry retains its color and vertical layers but the silhouette becomes a diagonal cascade, anchored at the base.
We need to infer rule. From examples, input shows a shape: a "hollow crust" of a color forming a ring? Let's examine Example1 input: a shape of R forming a hollow square? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 11 rows? Actually 11 rows, 13 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13 columns. The shape appears like a "U" maybe? Let's visualize: rows 4-9 have R pattern. Rows (0-index): row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 Rs) row4: col4 R, col8 R (edges) row5: col4-5 R, col8 R (two Rs left, one right) row6: col5 R, col8-9 R (one left, two right) row7: col5 R, col8 R (one left, one right) row8: col5-9 R (5 Rs) So shape is like a "hollow triangle"? Actually looks like a shape of a "pie slice"? Let's see output: shape shifted diagonally down-left? Output rows 3-8: pattern: row3: R R R R . . . . . . . . . row4: R . . . R . . . . . . . . row5: . R R . . R . . . . . . . row6: . . . R . . R R . . . . . row7: . . . . R . . . R . . . . row8: . . . . . R R R R R . . . So output shape is same as input but "leaning cascade" anchored at base? Let's compare: Input shape seems like a "hollow right triangle" oriented with right side vertical? Actually input shape appears like a "hollow square ring"? Let's draw coordinates relative to shape's bounding box. Input shape bounding box rows 3-8, cols 4-9 (6 columns). Within that, pattern: Row0 (r3): cols4-8 filled (5) leaving col9 empty. Row1 (r4): col4 filled, col8 filled. Row2 (r5): col4-5 filled, col8 filled. Row3 (r6): col5 filled, col8-9 filled. Row4 (r7): col5 filled, col8 filled. Row5 (r8): col5-9 filled (5). So shape looks like a "hollow hourglass"? Not. Now output shape bounding box rows3-8, cols0-4? Actually output rows3-8, columns0-4? Let's see row3: R at cols0-3 (4). Row4: R at col0 and col4. Row5: R at col1-2 and col5? Wait row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." That's col1,2,5. Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => col3,6,7. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => col4,8. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9. So output shape is same pattern but shifted diagonally down-right? Actually compare input to output: Input had leftmost column at col4, output leftmost at col0 (shift left). Wait output leftmost column is col0 for row3, but row4 leftmost col0 as well. So shape moved leftwards and also maybe rotated? Let's overlay: Input shape seems to be same as output but mirrored horizontally? Let's test: If we reflect input horizontally (mirror left-right) within its bounding box, would we get output? Input row3: R at cols4-8 (5). Mirror would be at cols? Within bounding box width 6 (4-9). Mirror of col4 becomes col9, col5->8, col6->7, col7->6, col8->5. That would produce R at cols5-9 (5). Output row3 has R at cols0-3 (4). Not match. Maybe rule: shift each row left by its row index relative to top of shape? The description: "bottom crust layer stays stuck to the plate. Each successive layer above it slides sideways as if gravity were pulling it off the edge — the highe ... [9537 chars truncated]
"A chord played on a harp, where higher strings ring later and their echoes drift further from the soundboard"
120b: k=3
See: A colored shape sits silently on a dark staff — a hollow resonating body made of a single hue against silence.
Do: The lowest tone stays fixed at the soundboard. Each higher harmonic drifts progressively further from the instrument's body — one step of echo for each step of pitch above the fundamental. The chord stretches into a diagonal wash of sound.
Grid: The silent background persists. The shape's vertical range is unchanged, but its profile skews as each ascending voice drifts laterally by its interval above the root note.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input shapes: In example1, shape is red R forming some pattern (maybe a digit?). Output is same shape but shifted leftwards? Let's compare. Example1 input grid 11 rows? Actually 11 rows, 13 columns. Input rows 4-9 contain shape. Output rows same rows but shape moved leftwards gradually? Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 0-12. Input row3 (0-index) row index 3: ". . . . R R R R R . . . ." => columns 4-8 are R (5 cells). Output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => columns 0-3 are R (4 cells)?? Wait output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." That's 4 Rs at cols0-3. Input had 5 Rs at cols4-8. So shape changed. Let's write input shape coordinates (rows 3-8). I'll list rows with indices. Row3 (r=3): cols4-8 = R (5) Row4 (r=4): pattern ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4 and col8 (2) Row5 (r=5): ". . . . R R . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4,5,8 (3) Row6 (r=6): ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." => Rs at col5,8,9 (3) Row7 (r=7): ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => Rs at col5,9 (2) Row8 (r=8): ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => Rs at col5-9 (5) Now output rows 3-8: Row3 (r=3): "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => Rs at col0-3 (4) Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => Rs at col0 and col4 (2) Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => Rs at col1,2,5 (3) Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => Rs at col3,6,7 (3) Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => Rs at col4,8 (2) Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => Rs at col5-9 (5) Observations: The shape seems to have been "sheared" diagonally: each row's pattern shifted left by row offset? Let's compute shift relative to input. Row3: input cols4-8 (5). Output cols0-3 (4). Not just shift; also width changed. Maybe rule: For each column, the shape is moved leftwards by its distance from bottom? Let's examine vertical alignment: The shape's vertical range unchanged (rows 3-8). The description: "lowest tone stays fixed at the soundboard. Each higher harmonic drifts progressively further from the instrument's body — one step of echo for each step of pitch above the fundamental. The chord stretches into a diagonal wash of sound." So bottom row (lowest tone) stays same position; rows above shift leftwards progressively more. In example1, bottom row is row8 (lowest tone). In output row8 unchanged: same as input row8 (cols5-9). Indeed output row8 matches input row8 exactly. Row7 (one above) shifted left by 1? Input row7 had Rs at col5 and 9. Output row7 has Rs at col4 and 8 (both -1). Yes shift left by 1. Row6 shift left by 2? Input row6 had Rs at col5,8,9. Output row6 has Rs at col3,6,7. That's -2 for each column. Yes col5->3, col8->6, col9->7. Row5 shift left by 3? Input row5 cols4,5,8 -> output cols1,2,5 (shift -3). Row4 shift left by 4? Input row4 cols4,8 -> output cols0,4 (shift -4). Row3 shift left by 5? Input row3 cols4-8 -> output cols? Input col4->? output col? row3 output has cols0-3 (4 cells). That's shift -4? Wait input col4-> ... [8537 chars truncated]
"A formation of runners rounding a curve on a track, where the inner lane holds steady and each outer lane falls progressively further behind"
120b: k=2
See: A single colored formation of athletes stands on a dark field — a hollow squad outline in one team color.
Do: The runner on the innermost lane (the bottom edge) holds the starting line. Each runner further out drifts backward by their lane number, creating a staggered echelon. The formation tilts into a diagonal as outer lanes accumulate more offset.
Grid: The dark field remains. The formation keeps its color and vertical spread, but the horizontal profile becomes an angled stagger anchored at the bottom.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1 input: a shape of R forming a hollow square? Let's visualize coordinates. Input grid 11 rows? Actually 11 rows, 13 columns. The shape appears like a hollow diamond? Let's map rows with R. Rows 4-9 (0-index?). Let's index rows 0-10. Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 contiguous) Row4: col4 R, col8 R (edges) Row5: col4-5 R, col8 R (two left, one right) Row6: col5 R, col8-9 R (one left, two right) Row7: col5 R, col8 R (edges) Row8: col5-9 R (5 contiguous) So shape is like a rotated square? Actually looks like a hollow shape with vertical thickness. Output: same shape but shifted leftwards gradually? Let's see output rows. Row3: columns0-3 R (4 contiguous) then rest empty. Row4: col0 R, col4 R Row5: col1-2 R, col5 R Row6: col3 R, col6-7 R Row7: col4 R, col8 R Row8: col5-9 R (same as input row8 but shifted right? Wait input row8 had col5-9 R, output row8 same col5-9 R). Actually output row8 unchanged. Observations: The shape seems to have been "sheared" diagonally: each row moved left by its distance from bottom? Let's compute offset: bottom row (row8) offset 0. Row7 offset 1 left? Input row7 had col5 and col8. Output row7 has col4 and col8? Actually output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . .". That's col4 and col8. Input row7: ". . . . . R . . R R . .". Wait input row7 had col5 and col8-9? Let's re-evaluate. Input row7 (index 7): ". . . . . R . . R R . . .". That's col5 R, col8 R, col9 R. Output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . .". That's col4 R, col8 R. So shape changed: some cells removed? Actually shape seems to be "tilted" such that the left edge moves leftwards each row upward, while right edge maybe stays same? Let's compare each row. Let's list input leftmost R column per row (rows 3-8): Row3: left=4, right=8 (span 5) Row4: left=4, right=8 Row5: left=4, right=8? Actually row5 left=4, right=8 (since col4-5 R, col8 R) Row6: left=5, right=9? row6 col5 R, col8-9 R => left=5, right=9 Row7: left=5, right=9 (col5, col8,9) Row8: left=5, right=9 (col5-9) Output leftmost per row: Row3: left=0, right=3 (span4) Row4: left=0, right=4? Actually row4 output: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => left=0, right=4 Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => left=1, right=5? Actually there are R at col1,2,5. So leftmost=1, rightmost=5. Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => left=3, right=6,7? Actually R at col3,6,7. So leftmost=3, rightmost=7. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => left=4, right=8. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => left=5, right=9. So pattern: leftmost column moves leftwards as we go up, by 1 each row? Let's compute offset relative to bottom row (row8 left=5). Row7 left=4 (offset -1). Row6 left=3 (offset -2). Row5 left=1 (offset -4) not -3. Row4 left=0 (offset -5). Row3 left=0 (offset -5). So not linear. But maybe rule: shift shape leftwards such that its bottom edge anchored, and each row is shifted left by its row index from bottom (i.e., number of rows above bottom). Let's compute bottom row ind ... [5365 chars truncated]
"A thundercloud sheared by wind gradient — its base fixed over the warm ground while upper layers are swept sideways by increasing jet stream winds"
120b: k=1
See: A colored cloud formation floats in a dark sky — a single-hued hollow mass with empty air inside.
Do: The cloud's base remains anchored to the thermal below. Wind speed increases with altitude, so each higher layer of cloud is pushed sideways more aggressively. The column becomes a leaning anvil shape, with the topmost wisps displaced the greatest distance.
Grid: The dark sky stays. The cloud's color and vertical extent are preserved, but its outline tilts as each layer above the base shifts horizontally by its height above ground level.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has a shape of red cloud: a hollow shape? Let's view input grid coordinates. 11 rows? Actually given 11 rows of 13 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13 columns. rows 0-10. In input, red shape appears rows 3-9 columns 4-8 maybe. Let's map. Row3: columns 4-8 are R R R R R (5). Row4: col4 R, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 R (so hollow). Row5: col4 R, col5 R, col6 ., col7 ., col8 R. Row6: col5 R, col8 R R? Wait row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." columns: col5? Let's index 0-12. Row6 string: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." So at col5 = R, col8=R, col9=R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => col5 R, col9 R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9 all R. So shape is like a hollow vertical column with base at row8? Actually bottom row (row8) full line of R from col5-9. Row3 top line full line of 5 R from col4-8 (shifted left one). So shape is like a tilted column? The output shows shape shifted leftwards as we go down? Let's see output rows. Output rows same size. Row3 output: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." So top row (row3) now has R at cols0-3? Wait output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." That's 4 Rs at cols0-3. In input top row had 5 Rs at cols4-8. So they moved leftwards and also maybe compressed? Let's map transformation: each layer above base shifts left by its height above base? The description: base remains anchored, each higher layer shifts horizontally by its height above ground level. In metaphor, wind pushes higher layers more sideways. So we tilt shape: base stays same, topmost moves most. In example, base is row8 (the bottom of shape). In output, row8 unchanged? Output row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." same as input row8. Yes base unchanged. Row7 (one above base) input had R at col5 and col9. Output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." That's R at col4 and col8? Wait output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." That's col4 R, col8 R. Input row7 had col5 and col9. So shifted left by 1. Row6 input had R at col5, col8, col9. Output row6: ". . . . . R R . . . . . ." Wait output row6: ". . . . . R R . . . . . ." That's col5 R, col6 R. Actually need to parse: row6 output: ". . . . . R R . . . . . ." That's col5 R, col6 R. Input had col5, col8, col9. So they moved left by? The leftmost R stays same col5, others shift left more? Let's compute shift amount = distance from base? Row6 is 2 rows above base (row8). So shift left by 2? Input col8 -> col6 (shift -2). Input col9 -> col7 (shift -2). Indeed output has R at col5 (unchanged?) Wait leftmost R at col5 should shift left 2 to col3, but output shows at col5. Hmm maybe shape is not uniform; the left edge is anchored? Actually base anchored, but shape may be hollow; maybe each cell moves left by its vertical distance from base, but only if there is empty space? Let's test: For row6 (distance 2), input R at col5 should go to col3, but output shows at col5. So maybe shift right? Let's examine more. Let's compute shift ... [6296 chars truncated]
"A pagoda in an earthquake, where each story slides on its posts — the foundation holds but upper floors rack progressively further out of plumb"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored structure stands on a dark plane — a hollow architectural outline of one material color.
Do: The foundation story refuses to move. Each floor above it shifts laterally on its bearings — one unit of displacement per story of height above the base. The pagoda becomes a leaning stack, each level jutting further than the one below.
Grid: The dark ground plane remains. The structure keeps its hue and number of stories, but the footprint skews into a diagonal cascade anchored at the ground floor.
We need to infer rule from example. Input shows a shape of red R forming a hollow square? Let's visualize: Input grid 11 rows, 13 columns? Actually given 11 rows, each row 13 columns. The red shape appears like a "hollow architectural outline of one material color". In input, red forms a shape: rows 4-9 (0-index?). Let's map coordinates. Row indices starting 0. Rows 0-2 empty. Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 Rs). Row4: col4 R, col8 R (with spaces). Row5: col4-5 R,R then col8 R. Row6: col5 R, col8-9 R,R? Actually row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." => col5 R, col8 R, col9 R. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." => col5 R, col9 R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9 R. So shape is like a hollow rectangle? Let's draw coordinates: columns 4-8 (5 wide) rows 3-8 (6 tall). The interior is mostly empty except some Rs at certain positions making maybe a diagonal? Actually interior: row4 col5-7 empty, row5 col5 empty? row5 col5 is '.'? row5: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => col4 R, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 R. So interior empty. Row6: col5 R (that's interior left side?), but left side originally at col4? Wait left side column is 4. Row6 col5 is one right of left side, maybe interior. Row6 also has col8 and col9 Rs (right side plus extra). Row7 col5 R, col9 R. Row8 bottom row full of Rs col5-9. Thus shape is like a "pagoda" maybe? The description: "single-colored structure stands on a dark plane — a hollow architectural outline of one material color." So shape is a hollow outline (border) of a rectangle? But interior not fully empty: there are some Rs inside (like a diagonal?). Actually row6 col5 R is interior left side? The left border originally at col4, but row6 has R at col5, shifting right one. Row7 col5 R also interior. So shape maybe is a "staircase" leaning? The transformation output shows shape shifted leftwards? Let's see output. Output rows 0-2 empty. Row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." => columns 0-3 Rs (4 Rs). Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." => col0 R, col4 R. Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." => col1 R, col2 R, col5 R. Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." => col3 R, col6 R, col7 R. Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." => col4 R, col8 R. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." => col5-9 Rs. So output shape appears same as input but shifted leftwards each row? Let's compare coordinates: Input shape columns roughly 4-8. Output shape columns 0-4? Actually bottom row (row8) output has Rs at col5-9, same as input bottom row col5-9. Wait bottom row unchanged? Input bottom row row8 had Rs col5-9. Output same. Row7 input had Rs at col5 and col9. Output row7 has Rs at col4 and col8 (shift left by 1). Row6 input had Rs at col5, col8, col9. Output row6 has Rs at col3, col6, col7 (shift left by 2?). Row5 input had Rs at col4, col5?, col8? Actually row5 input: col4 R, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 R. Output row5: col1 R, col2 R, col5 R. That's shift left by 3? Not consistent. Let's compute shift per row relative to base row (groun ... [7531 chars truncated]
"A phalanx breaking under a flanking charge — the rear rank holds the line while each forward rank buckles sideways, the vanguard displaced the farthest"
120b: k=1
See: A colored battle formation holds position on a dark field — a single-hued hollow shield wall with empty ground inside.
Do: The rearmost rank stands firm as the anchor. Each rank ahead of it is pushed sideways by mounting pressure from the flank — one step of displacement per rank of distance from the anchor line. The formation shears into a diagonal echelon.
Grid: The dark battlefield persists. The formation's color and depth are retained, but the frontline is displaced furthest while the rear holds, creating a slanted line of battle.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape: a hollow rectangle? In example, input has a shape of red R forming a hollow square? Let's visualize: rows 3-9 (0-index?). Input rows 3-9 have R pattern: row3: R R R R R (5) starting col4? Actually given with spaces. Let's map coordinates: columns 0-12. Row3: ". . . . R R R R R . . . ." So columns 4-8 are R (5). Row4: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." columns 4 and 8. Row5: ". . . . R R . . R . . . ." columns 4,5,8. Row6: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." columns5,8,9. Row7: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." columns5,9. Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." columns5-9. So shape is like a diagonal? Actually looks like a rotated square? It's like a shape that is a "hollow shield wall" with empty interior. The description: single-hued hollow shield wall with empty ground inside. So shape is a hollow rectangle (border) maybe? Let's see: The border of a shape: top row full, bottom row full, left side maybe vertical line? In input, left side appears at column4 rows3-5, then column5 rows6-8? So left side shifts rightwards as go down: that's the shear transformation described. Output shows shape shifted leftwards? Let's see output: Row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." So top row moved left to columns0-3? Actually output row3 has R at cols0-3 (4 Rs). Input top row had Rs at cols4-8 (5). Output top row has 4 Rs? Wait count: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." that's 4 Rs. Input had 5 Rs. Something changed. Let's map output rows: Row3 (index3) output: R R R R . . . . . . . . . (cols0-3). Row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." (R at col0 and col4). Row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." (R at col1,2,5). Row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." (R at col3,6,7). Row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." (R at col4,8). Row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." (R at col5-9). So shape has been sheared to the left? Actually anchor is rearmost rank (bottom row) stays same? Input bottom row (row8) had Rs at cols5-9. Output bottom row same. So anchor row unchanged. Each row above moves left by one per distance from bottom. Indeed bottom row (distance0) unchanged. Row7 (distance1) moved left by 1: input row7 had Rs at col5 and 9. Output row7 has Rs at col4 and 8 (shift left 1). Row6 (distance2) input Rs at col5,8,9 -> output at col3,6,7 (shift left 2). Row5 (dist3) input Rs at col4,5,8 -> output at col1,2,5 (shift left 3). Row4 (dist4) input Rs at col4 and 8 -> output at col0 and 4 (shift left 4). Row3 (dist5) input Rs at cols4-8 -> output at cols? shift left5 gives cols -1 to 3? But negative columns drop off. So only those that remain within grid appear: input cols4-8 shift left5 => cols -1,0,1,2,3 => visible cols0-3 (4 Rs). That's output row3: Rs at 0-3. Yes matches. Thus rule: Identify a contiguous shape (colored region) that is a "hollow shield wall" (border). The bottommost row of shape is anchor, stays same. For each row above, shift left by number of rows below it within shape (i.e., distance from bottom). Equivalent to shear transformation to the left, pivot at ... [3926 chars truncated]
"Actors taking a cascading bow — the downstage performer bends first and stays low while each upstage performer sweeps further into the wings before bowing"
120b: k=1
See: A single-colored troupe holds a formation on a dark stage — a hollow ensemble outline in one costume hue.
Do: The performer closest to the audience (bottom edge) stays center stage. Each performer further upstage takes a sweeping sidestep before bowing — one extra step for each row of depth behind the anchor. The troupe fans into a diagonal curtain call.
Grid: The dark stage remains. The troupe's color and vertical positions are unchanged, but each row's horizontal placement shifts progressively, creating a fanned diagonal anchored at the footlights.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape of orange O forming a hollow outline? Let's examine example 1: Input has red R shape. Output shows same shape but shifted leftwards progressively per row? Let's compare. Input rows (0-index maybe). Let's list rows with R positions. Rows 0-2 empty. Row3: columns? Input row3: ". . . . R R R R R . . . ." That's 5 Rs from col4 to col8? Actually indices: col0..12. So row3 has Rs at 4-8 inclusive (5 cells). Output row3: "R R R R . . . . . . . . ." That's Rs at col0-3 (4 cells). Wait count changed. Let's map more precisely. I'll write coordinates. Assume width 13. Row3 input: positions 4,5,6,7,8 = R (5 cells). Output row3: positions 0,1,2,3 = R (4 cells). So shape changed. Row4 input: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." positions 4 and 8. Output row4: "R . . . R . . . . . . . ." positions 0 and 4. So each row shifted left by 4? Not exactly. Row5 input: ". . . . R R . . R . . . ." positions 4,5,8. Output row5: ". R R . . R . . . . . . ." positions 1,2,5. Row6 input: ". . . . . R . . R R . . ." positions 5,8,9. Output row6: ". . . R . . R R . . . . ." positions 3,6,7. Row7 input: ". . . . . R . . . R . . ." positions 5,9. Output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." positions 4,8. Row8 input: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." positions 5-9 (5 cells). Output row8: ". . . . . R R R R R . . ." same positions 5-9 unchanged. Observation: The bottommost row (row8) unchanged. Row7 shifted left by 1? Input row7 had positions 5 and 9; output row7 positions 4 and 8 (both -1). Row6: input 5,8,9 -> output 3,6,7 (shift -2). Row5: input 4,5,8 -> output 1,2,5 (shift -3). Row4: input 4,8 -> output 0,4 (shift -4). Row3: input 4-8 -> output 0-3 (shift -4? Actually 4->0 shift -4, 5->1 shift -4, 6->2 shift -4, 7->3 shift -4, 8->? disappears? output only 0-3, so 8 shifted to 4? but not present. So maybe shape is hollow outline, and they are moving each row left by (bottom row index - current row index). The bottom row (anchor) stays same. Each row above moves left by number of rows below it (distance from bottom). That matches: bottom row index 8 (anchor). Row7 distance 1 -> shift left 1. Row6 distance 2 -> shift left 2. Row5 distance 3 -> shift left 3. Row4 distance 4 -> shift left 4. Row3 distance 5 -> shift left 5? But we observed shift -4 for most cells, not -5. Let's compute: Row3 distance = 5 (8-3). Input col4 -> output col? 4-5 = -1 (off grid) so disappears. Indeed output row3 has no cell at col? Actually output row3 has Rs at 0-3, which came from input cols 4-7 shifted -4. So shift -4 not -5. So maybe shift equals distance-1? Let's test: Row7 distance 1 -> shift -1 (yes). Row6 distance 2 -> shift -2 (yes). Row5 distance 3 -> shift -3 (yes). Row4 distance 4 -> shift -4 (yes). Row3 distance 5 -> shift -4? Not matching. Maybe because shape width limited; they shift but also keep shape within left boundary, cropping at left edge. So shift -5 would move col4 to -1 (off grid) a ... [4834 chars truncated]
"An espalier vine trained against a wall, its lowest branch nailed in place while upper branches are pulled further along the trellis wires with each tier of growth"
120b: k=1
See: A colored vine grows on a dark wall — a single-hued hollow trellis outline with empty space inside its frame.
Do: The root branch at the bottom stays pinned to its nail. Each branch above is trained along the wire, drawn further sideways — one lattice-width per tier above the root. The vine's profile becomes a leaning fan against the wall.
Grid: The dark wall stays. The vine's color and vertical span hold, but its outline skews diagonally as each ascending branch is offset incrementally from the rooted base.
We need to infer rule. Input shows a shape: a hollow rectangle? Let's examine example1. Input grid 11 rows, 13 columns? Actually given 11 rows, each row 13 entries. The shape: a red outline of a shape? Let's map coordinates. Row indices 0-10, col 0-12. Rows 3-9 contain shape. Let's draw shape: Row3: columns 4-8 are R (5 cells). Row4: col4 R, col8 R. Row5: col4-5 R, col8 R. Row6: col5 R, col8-9 R. Row7: col5 R, col8 R. Row8: col5-9 R (5 cells). So shape looks like a hollow shape? Actually it's like a rotated "U"? Let's visualize: It seems like a shape that is like a "C" rotated? But output shows shape shifted leftwards and skewed diagonally upward? Let's compare output. Output rows same size. Output rows 3-9 have R's but shifted leftwards gradually upward? Row3 output: columns0-3 R (4 cells) then rest empty. Row4: col0 R, col4 R. Row5: col1-2 R, col5 R. Row6: col3 R, col5-6 R. Row7: col4 R, col8 R? Wait output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." Actually row7 output: columns4 R, column8 R. Row8 output: columns5-9 R (5 cells). So shape moved leftwards and also seems to be "leaning" like each row shifted left by row-3? Let's compute offset: Input row3 had R at cols4-8. Output row3 has R at cols0-3 (4 cells). That's shift -4 and also width changed (input width 5, output width 4). Row4 input: R at col4 and col8. Output row4: R at col0 and col4. So leftmost moved -4, rightmost moved -4? Actually col8 -> col4 shift -4. Row5 input: R at cols4-5 and col8. Output row5: R at cols1-2 and col5. So leftmost moved -3? Input leftmost col4 -> output col1 shift -3. Rightmost col8 -> output col5 shift -3. Row6 input: R at col5 and col8-9. Output row6: R at col3 and col5-6. Input leftmost col5 -> output col3 shift -2. Rightmost col9 -> output col6 shift -3? Wait col9->col6 shift -3. Not consistent. Maybe rule: "leaning fan" meaning each row above root (bottom) is offset one column to the left relative to row below. The root is bottom row of shape (row8 in example). The bottom row stays same? Input bottom row (row8) has R at cols5-9. Output bottom row (row8) same? Yes output row8: cols5-9 R unchanged. So bottom row unchanged. Then each row above is shifted left by 1 relative to row below. Let's test: Row7 (one above bottom) input row7: R at col5 and col8. Output row7: R at col4 and col8? Actually output row7: ". . . . R . . . R . . . ." That's col4 and col8. Compare to row8: bottom row has R at 5-9. Row7 should be shifted left by 1: So positions would be col4 and col7? But output has col4 and col8 (rightmost not shifted). Hmm maybe shape is outline of a "hollow trellis" where each row's left side moves left by 1 each row up, but right side stays same? Let's examine: Input left side columns: row8 leftmost col5, row7 leftmost col5, row6 leftmost col5, row5 leftmost col4, row4 leftmost col4, row3 leftmost col4. Output left side columns: row8 leftmost col5 (same), row7 leftmost col4 (shift -1), row6 leftmost col3 (shift -2), row5 leftmost col1 (shift - ... [10993 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a uniform background color. Against this background are one or more composite shapes, each consisting of two differently-colored rectangular regions stacked vertically (one color on top, another color on bottom). The two color regions share a horizontal boundary where they meet. Each region may have an irregular outline (not necessarily a perfect rectangle), but the top region and bottom region together form a single connected composite shape. The top region's leftmost column aligns with the bottom region's leftmost column in the input.
Do: For each composite shape in the grid, identify its two color regions: the upper color region and the lower color region. Shift the entire upper color region one column to the left, replacing vacated cells with the background color. Shift the entire lower color region one column to the right, replacing vacated cells with the background color. The two halves spread apart horizontally like opening a hinge — the top half moves left by one cell and the bottom half moves right by one cell. All other cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid dimensions remain the same from input to output. The background is a single uniform color filling all cells not occupied by the composite shapes. The grid is large enough that shifting regions by one column does not push any colored cells beyond the grid boundary.
"A book falls open and its pages splay apart from the spine."
120b: k=1
See: Against a calm, monochrome sky, you see one or more closed books standing upright. Each book has a colored cover on top and a differently colored cover on the bottom, pressed together along a shared spine where the two halves meet horizontally.
Do: A breeze catches each book and it falls open: the top cover fans to the left while the bottom cover fans to the right, each drifting exactly one step away from the spine. The sky fills in the thin gap each half leaves behind. The books breathe open, their two halves parting like wings unfolding from a single crease.
Grid: The sky is a single background color that fills every space not claimed by a book. The world is wide enough that no cover slides off the edge when the books fall open. Everything stays the same size — only the halves shift apart.
We need to infer rule. From description: books upright with colored cover top and bottom, share spine horizontally. When open, top cover moves left one step, bottom cover moves right one step, leaving gap filled with background color (sky). So input has vertical stacks? Let's examine example. Input grid 12x12. Colors: B background? In output, many B remain. The "books" likely are vertical rectangles of two colors stacked vertically (top half one color, bottom half another). In input example, we see region of Y (yellow) and R (red) etc. Let's locate in input example 1: rows 3-6 (0-index?) Actually rows 3-6 have Y region: rows 3-6 (starting at row index 2) columns? Let's map. I'll index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input rows: 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: B B B B B B B B B B B B 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8-11 all B. So there are two "books": one with Y top? Actually Y region appears as a shape: top half maybe Y? Let's see shape: rows 2-5 columns 2-8 maybe. The Y region forms a rectangle? rows 2-5, columns 2-8 (7 columns). But note rows 2-3 have Y at col2 and col6-8? Actually row2: col2=Y, col6=Y, col7=Y, col8=Y. Row3 same. Row4: cols2-8 all Y. Row5 same. So shape is like a "book" with top cover maybe Y? But there is also R region rows6-7 columns2-? Row6: cols2-8 all R. Row7: cols2-5 R, col6? row7 col6 = B, col7= B, col8=R. So R region is like bottom cover? The shape is similar but with a missing piece. In output, we see Y region shifted left? Let's compare output rows 2-5: Output rows2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B (col1? Actually output row2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B). So Y at col1 and col5-7. In input row2 Y at col2 and col6-8. So each Y moved left by 1? Indeed col2->col1, col6->col5, col7->col6, col8->col7. So shift left by 1. Similarly bottom cover R rows6-7 shift right by 1? Output row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B (R from col2-8 moved to col3-9). Indeed shift right by 1. Row7 output: B B B R R R R B B R B B. Input row7: B B R R R R B B R B B B. Shift right: col2->col3, col3->col4, col4->col5, col5->col6, col6 B stays? Actually B at col6 becomes B at col7? Wait shift right only for R cells, not B. So R at col2-5 become col3-6. R at col8 becomes col9. So matches. The gap (spine) column originally where the two halves met? In input, the spine is the line where top and bottom halves meet horizontally: they share a row? Actually they are stacked vertically, so spine is the horizontal line between them (row5/6?). The gap after moving: column where they were adjacent now becomes background B. Indeed column2? Let's see after shift, there is a column of B at col2? Output rows2-5 have B at col2 (since Y moved left). Row6-7 have B at col2 (since R moved right). So column2 becomes B (background). So rule: For each vertical stack of two colors (top cover color A, bottom cover color B) that are adjacent ver ... [7937 chars truncated]
"A cell prepares to divide: the upper organelles drift toward one pole while the lower organelles migrate toward the opposite pole, as if pulled apart by invisible spindle fibers."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Against a uniform cytoplasm, composite organisms rest—each made of two differently-pigmented tissue layers fused along a horizontal membrane.
Do: Mitosis begins. The upper tissue layer is tugged one unit toward the left pole; the lower tissue layer is drawn one unit toward the right pole. The cytoplasm fills behind each retreating half.
Grid: Grid dimensions stay fixed. Background is the cytoplasm. Vacated cells revert to cytoplasm color.
"A binary star system spirals apart through tidal interaction—the hotter upper star drifts toward galactic left while the cooler lower companion drifts toward galactic right."
120b: k=2
See: In a uniform void, binary systems float—each pair consisting of an upper stellar body of one color and a lower stellar body of another, sharing an orbital plane.
Do: Tidal forces act: the upper body migrates one unit to the left, the lower body one unit to the right. Dark void fills the separation.
Grid: Void dimensions unchanged. Vacated space becomes background.
We need to infer rule. From description: "binary systems float—each pair consisting of an upper stellar body of one color and a lower stellar body of another, sharing an orbital plane. Tidal forces act: the upper body migrates one unit to the left, the lower body one unit to the right. Dark void fills the separation. Grid details: Void dimensions unchanged. Vacated space becomes background." Interpretation: In input, there are vertical pairs? Upper body of one color, lower body of another, same column? They move apart horizontally: upper moves left, lower moves right, leaving background (maybe '.' or original background color) in between. Look at example 1. Input grid 12x12. Colors: B background? B is blue but appears everywhere except Y and R shapes. In output, B remains background. Y shape moved? Let's compare. Input example1: rows 3-6 have Y region: coordinates? Let's index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input rows: 0: all B 1: all B 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: same as row2 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: same as row4 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8-11 all B Output rows: 0-1 all B unchanged. Rows2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B Row3 same. Row4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B Row5 same. Row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B Row7: B B B R R R R B B R B B Rows8-11 all B. So what changed? The Y region originally had upper part? Let's see original Y region: rows2-5, columns? At row2 col2 is Y, col6-8 Y Y Y. Row3 same. Row4 col2-8 Y. Row5 same. In output, Y region shifted left for upper part? Let's compare each cell. Original row2 col2 Y stays Y? In output row2 col1? Wait output row2 col1 is Y? Actually output row2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B. So Y at col1 and col5-7. So original Y at col2 moved left to col1 (one left). Original Y at col6-8 moved left? They are now at col5-7 (one left). So upper Y region (maybe top half) moved left by 1. Row3 same. Row4 original Y at col2-8. Output row4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B. So Y at col1-7 (shift left by 1). Row5 same. Thus the Y region (a block) moved left by 1 column overall. But description says upper body moves left, lower body moves right. However Y region maybe upper body? Let's see R region: Input rows6-7 have R. Row6 col2-8 R. Row7 col2-5 R, col6? Actually row7: B B R R R R B B R B B B (col2-5 R, col8 R). Output row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B (R shifted right? originally col2-8 now col3-9? That's shift right by 1). Row7 output: B B B R R R R B B R B B (R at col3-6 and col9). So lower body (R) moved right by 1. Thus we have a pair: upper Y moved left, lower R moved right. They were vertically adjacent? Y rows 2-5, R rows 6-7. So they share same columns originally (overlap columns 2-8). So they form a binary system: upper color Y, lower color R. The rule: shift upper region left by 1, lower region right by 1, fill vacated cells with background (B). That's consistent. Now example2: Input has colors A background? Actually A is azure used as background. There are M region (magenta) rows1-4? Let's exa ... [8514 chars truncated]
"A capsizing vessel lists apart—the sail and rigging above the waterline heel to port while the keel and hull below the waterline swing to starboard."
120b: fig alone solves
See: On calm seas, vessels float—each with a colored superstructure above and a differently colored hull below, joined at the waterline.
Do: The vessel capsizes in slow motion: the superstructure shifts one cell to port (left), the hull shifts one cell to starboard (right). Sea fills the gap.
Grid: Ocean dimensions unchanged. Exposed water matches the sea background.
"A relay contact opens: the upper terminal plate retracts one notch left while the lower terminal plate retracts one notch right, breaking the circuit between them."
120b: fig alone solves
See: On a bare circuit board, relay assemblies sit—each with an upper contact plate of one color and a lower contact plate of another, touching at a shared connection line.
Do: The relay triggers: the upper plate slides one position left, the lower plate slides one position right. Bare board is exposed at the break.
Grid: Board dimensions unchanged. Exposed positions take the board background color.
"The earth and sky are pried apart by a primordial act of separation—the celestial half rises to the left while the chthonic half sinks to the right, and the void opens between them."
120b: fig alone solves
See: In a primordial unity, composite beings exist—each fusing a heavenly upper nature of one color with an earthly lower nature of another, meeting at a horizon line.
Do: Creation begins: the celestial half separates one step to the left, the earthly half one step to the right. The void of the background fills the space between.
Grid: The cosmos dimensions remain fixed. The void is the background color.
"Partners in a lift separate: the dancer above leans left while the base below steps right, widening the frame into an open counterbalance."
120b: k=2
See: On an empty stage floor, dance pairs are frozen in lifts—each pair with an upper dancer of one color and a supporting base of another color, connected at the hold.
Do: They release: the upper dancer extends one space to the left, the base steps one space to the right. The bare floor appears between them.
Grid: Stage floor dimensions unchanged. Gaps show the floor background color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "dance pairs frozen in lifts—each pair with an upper dancer of one color and a supporting base of another color, connected at the hold. They release: the upper dancer extends one space to the left, the base steps one space to the right. The bare floor appears between them." Interpretation: In input, there are patterns where two colors adjacent horizontally? Upper dancer (maybe top cell) and base (bottom cell) connected at hold (maybe same column?). Actually "upper dancer extends one space to the left, the base steps one space to the right" suggests a vertical pair (two cells stacked) that are adjacent vertically (upper above lower). They are connected at the hold (maybe they share a side). After transformation, the upper moves left, lower moves right, leaving empty (background) cell where they were. Thus we need to find vertical pairs of two different colors (maybe same column) that are adjacent vertically (touching). In output, the upper cell's color moves left one cell (same row), lower cell's color moves right one cell (same row), and the original two cells become background (maybe original color of floor? In examples, background is B in example1? Input background B? Let's examine. Example1 Input: many B background. There are Y region and R region. In input, there is a vertical pair? Let's locate: At rows 3-4 (0-index?), Actually grid 12x12. Input shows Y region: rows 2-5 columns 2-? Let's map. Input rows (0-index): 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: B B B B B B B B B B B B 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8-11 all B. We see vertical adjacency of Y and R? Not same column. Actually there is a vertical pair of Y and R? At column 2 (0-index) rows 2-5 have Y, rows 6-7 have R? Not adjacent (gap). The rule maybe about "pairs" where two colors are adjacent horizontally? Let's examine transformation output. Output rows 2-5 columns changed: In output, row2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B (instead of B B Y...). So Y moved left? Let's compare input row2 col2 (index2) was Y, output row2 col1 is Y (moved left). Row2 col6-8 Y Y Y unchanged? Actually input row2 col6-8 Y Y Y, output same. Row3 similar. Row4 input: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B. Output row4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B (Y moved left one at col1). Row5 same. So pattern: a vertical column of Y at column2 (index2) rows2-5 (4 cells). In output, those Y's moved left one column (col1) rows2-5. The original column2 becomes B (background). So the "upper dancer extends left" maybe for a vertical line of same color? But also there is R region: Input rows6-7 columns2-? Actually row6: B B R R R R R R R B B B (R from col2 to col8). Row7: B B R R R R B B R B B B (R at col2-5, col8). Output rows6-7: row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B (R shifted right? Actually output row6 col3? Let's compare: Input row6 col2 is R, output row6 col3 is R? Wait output row6: ... [9744 chars truncated]
"A fault line activates and the strata shear apart—the upper rock layer grinds one step to the left while the lower layer grinds one step to the right, a classic strike-slip displacement."
120b: fig alone solves
See: In uniform bedrock, layered formations appear—each with an upper stratum of one mineral color and a lower stratum of another, meeting at a horizontal fault plane.
Do: The fault slips: the upper stratum displaces one cell to the left, the lower stratum one cell to the right. The surrounding bedrock fills the voids.
Grid: Bedrock dimensions unchanged. Gaps fill with the uniform bedrock background.
"A layered sandwich is sliced down the middle and the two halves are nudged apart on the cutting board—the top filling peeks left, the bottom filling peeks right."
120b: k=1
See: On a clean countertop, one or more two-layer sandwiches sit, each with a different colored filling on top and bottom, joined at a shared crust line.
Do: The chef offsets the layers: the upper filling slides one space toward the left edge of the board, the lower filling slides one space toward the right. The countertop shows through the gap.
Grid: The cutting board dimensions remain the same. Exposed countertop matches the background color.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Output same size. We have "sandwiches" two-layer with different colored filling on top and bottom, joined at a shared crust line. Upper filling slides left, lower slides right, gap shows background. Interpretation: Identify contiguous region of a color that forms a "sandwich": two layers stacked vertically? In example, there are two sandwiches: one with Y (yellow) top layer and R (red) bottom? Let's examine input example 1. I'll reconstruct small portion. Input rows (0-index): Row0: B B B B B B B B B B B B Row1: B B B B B B B B B B B B Row2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B Row3: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B Row4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B Row5: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B Row6: B B R R R R R R R B B B Row7: B B R R R R B B R B B B Rows8-11 all B. So there are two distinct colored regions: Y region (top) and R region (bottom). They are adjacent vertically? Y region occupies rows2-5 columns2-? Let's map coordinates (col index). Row2: col2=Y, col6-8=Y Y Y. Row3 same. Row4: col2-8 all Y. Row5 same. R region rows6-7 columns2-? Row6: col2-8 all R. Row7: col2-5 R, col6-7 B, col8 R. So they share a "crust line" where they meet? The Y region bottom touches R region top at row5/6? Actually Y region ends at row5, R starts at row6, same columns 2-8. So they are stacked vertically with a shared border line (row5/6). That's the sandwich: top filling Y, bottom filling R, crust line between them (maybe the line of adjacency). The rule: shift top filling left by one cell, bottom filling right by one cell, leaving background (B) in the gap. Check output: Y region moved left: In output rows2-5, Y region columns? Row2 output: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B. So Y at col1 and col5-7. Original had Y at col2 and col6-8. So each Y moved left by 1 (col2->1, col6->5, col7->6, col8->7). Yes. R region moved right: Output row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B. Original row6 had R at col2-8. Now at col3-9 (shift right by 1). Row7 output: B B B R R R R B B R B B. Original row7 had R at col2-5 and col8. Now at col3-6 and col9? Let's see: output row7: columns? Let's index: col0 B,1 B,2 B,3 R,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 R,10 B,11 B. So R at 3-6 (shifted from 2-5) and at 9 (shifted from 8). Yes. Thus rule: For each vertical pair of colored regions stacked (top and bottom) sharing a border, shift top region left by 1, bottom region right by 1, leaving background color (original background) in vacated cells. The background is the color that fills rest of board (B). The board dimensions unchanged. Now test input: 13 rows? Let's count rows: Provided grid lines: 1: A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A B A A B A A A A A A A 3: A A B B B B A A A A A A A 4: A A B B B B A A A A A A A 5: A A R R R R A A A A A A A 6: A A A A A A A A A A A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A A A 8: A A A A A A A A A A A A A 9: A A A A A A A A A A A A A 10: A A A A A A R R R A A A A 11: A A A A A A R R R A A A A 12: A A A A A A Y Y Y A A A A 13: A A A A A ... [7598 chars truncated]
"A chord splits into contrary motion—the upper voice steps left while the lower voice steps right, opening an interval between them like diverging melodic lines."
120b: fail
See: On a silent staff of uniform color, composite tone clusters appear, each formed from an upper register block and a lower register block sharing a common harmonic boundary.
Do: The upper voice shifts one position to the left; the lower voice shifts one position to the right. Silence fills the spaces each voice abandons.
Grid: The staff dimensions are unchanged. Rests (background color) fill vacated positions.
We need to infer rule. From description: "staff of uniform color" background. "composite tone clusters appear, each formed from an upper register block and a lower register block sharing a common harmonic boundary." So there are clusters composed of two blocks stacked vertically sharing a boundary row? Upper block shifts left, lower block shifts right. Vacated positions become background. Look at example 1 input and output to deduce. Let's write input grid (12x12). Represent rows. I'll index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input rows: 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: B B B B B B B B B B B B 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8: B B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B B B B B B B B B B 10: B B B B B B B B B B B B 11: B B B B B B B B B B B B Output rows: 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: B B B B B B B B B B B B 2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B 3: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B 4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B 5: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B 6: B B B R R R R R R R B B 7: B B B R R R R B B R B B 8-11 same all B. Observations: In input, there is a cluster of Y's forming a shape: rows 2-5, columns? Let's map Y positions. Rows2: col2=Y, col6=Y, col7=Y, col8=Y Row3 same. Row4: col2-8 all Y (col2-8 inclusive) Row5 same. So shape looks like two blocks: upper block maybe rows2-3? lower block rows4-5? They share boundary between rows3 and4? Actually upper block rows2-3, lower block rows4-5. Upper block appears to have Y at col2 and a group at col6-8. Lower block is a solid rectangle col2-8. In output, Y's have shifted: upper block moved left by 1? Let's see output Y positions. Rows2: col1=Y, col5-7=Y Y Y? Wait output row2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B. So Y at col1, and col5,6,7. That's left shift of upper block: originally at col2 becomes col1 (left 1). The group at col6-8 becomes col5-7 (left 1). Good. Rows3 same. Rows4: output row4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B. Y at col1-7? Actually row4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B. That's Y at col1 through col7 (seven Y). Original lower block had Y at col2-8 (seven Y). Shift right? Wait they moved left? Original lower block col2-8; output col1-7 (left 1). But description said lower voice shifts right. Hmm maybe I misinterpret which is upper/lower. Let's examine lower block maybe rows2-3? Actually "upper register block" maybe top part of cluster (higher rows) shift left, lower block shift right. In example, upper rows (2-3) shifted left (yes). Lower rows (4-5) should shift right, but they shifted left as well? Let's check: original lower block rows4-5 had Y across col2-8. Output rows4-5 have Y across col1-7 (left). That's left shift, not right. Maybe I mis-assign which rows are upper/lower. Could be that the cluster is composed of two blocks side by side sharing a vertical boundary, not horizontal. Let's examine R cluster rows6-7. Input R positions: rows6: col2-9? Actually row6: B B R R R R R R R B B B (col2-8? Wait count: indices 0 B,1 B,2 R ... [9775 chars truncated]
"A wrestler's stance widens: the shoulders lean left and the hips lean right, opening the body like a fighter shifting into a broader base."
120b: k=1
See: On a uniform mat, one or more figures stand—each composed of an upper body color and a lower body color meeting at the waist.
Do: Each figure shifts its upper body one unit to the left and its lower body one unit to the right. The mat is revealed where the body once was.
Grid: The mat dimensions stay constant. Exposed mat matches the background.
We need to infer rule. From description: figures composed of upper body color and lower body color meeting at waist. Upper body shifts left, lower body shifts right, leaving background (mat) where body was. Input and output examples: Let's analyze. Example 1 input grid 12x12. Colors: B background? In output, many B remain. There are Y region (yellow) and R region (red). In input, Y region appears as a block? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input rows: 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: same 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: same as row2 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: same as row4 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8-11: all B Output rows: 0-1 all B. 2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B 3: same 4: B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B 5: same 6: B B B R R R R R R R B B 7: B B B R R R R B B R B B 8-11 all B. So compare input vs output: For Y region, originally at rows2-5, columns? Input Y positions: Rows2-3: col2 is Y, col6-8 are Y Y Y. Rows4-5: cols2-8 are Y (a 7-wide block). So shape looks like upper body? Upper body maybe top half of figure? Lower body maybe bottom half? In output, Y region shifted left for upper part? Let's see output Y positions: Rows2-3: col1 is Y (shift left from col2), col5-7 are Y Y Y (shift left from col6-8). So each Y moved left by 1 column. Rows4-5: col1-7 are Y (shift left from col2-8). So indeed all Y cells moved left by 1. The vacated cells become B (background). So Y is upper body? It moved left. Now R region: Input rows6-7: Row6: cols2-8 are R (7 cells). Row7: cols2-5 are R, cols6-7 are B B, col8 is R. So shape maybe lower body? In output, R region moved right by 1: Row6: cols3-9 are R (shift right). Row7: cols3-6 are R, col7-8 are B B, col9 is R. Indeed shift right by 1. Vacated cells become B. Thus rule: For each distinct non-background color (other than B), treat as a figure composed of upper and lower body? Actually each color may be either upper or lower? In example, Y moved left, R moved right. So maybe rule: Upper body colors are those that appear in top half of figure (maybe above waist line) and shift left; lower body colors shift right. How to determine which is upper vs lower? Possibly based on relative vertical position: The upper body is the topmost contiguous region of a color, lower body is bottommost region of a different color? But in example, Y and R are different colors, not same figure. The description says each figure composed of an upper body color and a lower body color meeting at waist. So each figure has two colors: upper and lower. In example, maybe there are two figures: one with upper Y and lower R? But they are separate vertical positions: Y region rows2-5, R region rows6-7, they meet at row5/6? Actually Y bottom row5, R top row6, they are adjacent vertically, same columns overlapping? In input, Y occupies columns2-8 rows2-5. R occupies columns2-8 rows6-7 (except some missing). So they meet at row5/6, same columns, forming a figure with upper Y, lower R. So the figure's w ... [7052 chars truncated]
"A thundercloud shears in the wind: the anvil top drifts one direction while the rain curtain beneath drifts the other, torn apart by opposing gusts at different altitudes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Against a calm sky, storm formations hover—each with an upper cloud mass in one hue and a lower precipitation mass in another, joined at a flat boundary.
Do: Wind shear acts: the upper cloud mass slides one cell leftward, the lower precipitation mass slides one cell rightward. Clear sky fills the gaps.
Grid: Sky dimensions remain fixed. Cleared cells become background sky color.
"A drawbridge splits at its center beam—the upper deck tilts toward the left bank while the lower counterweight swings toward the right, revealing water beneath."
120b: k=1
See: On a uniform foundation, structures stand—each built from an upper story of one material and a lower story of another, joined at a floor line.
Do: The structure cleaves at its seam: the upper story shifts one column left, the lower story shifts one column right. The foundation is exposed in the gap.
Grid: Foundation dimensions unchanged. Revealed cells take the background color.
We need to infer rule. From description: uniform foundation, structures built from upper story of one material and lower story of another, joined at a floor line. The structure cleaves at its seam: upper story shifts one column left, lower story shifts one column right. The foundation is exposed in the gap. So we have a base color (foundation) which is uniform across grid? In examples, background is B (blue). In input example 1, background B everywhere except some structures: there are Y region (yellow) and R region (red). They appear as rectangular blocks? Let's examine input1 grid 12x12. Let's map coordinates (row, col). The Y region appears rows 3-5? Actually rows index starting 0? Let's just view. Rows: 0: B B B B B B B B B B B B 1: B B B B B B B B B B B B 2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 3: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B 4: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 5: B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B 6: B B R R R R R R R B B B 7: B B R R R R B B R B B B 8-11 all B. So there are two structures: a Y structure (upper story maybe?) and R structure (lower story?). The description: each structure built from an upper story of one material and a lower story of another, joined at a floor line. So maybe each structure is composed of two colors stacked vertically: top part one color, bottom part another. In example, Y region maybe upper story? Actually Y region appears as shape: rows 2-5, columns 2-? Let's see coordinates: Y at (2,2), (2,6-8). Row3 similar. Row4 columns 2-8 all Y. Row5 same. So shape is like a T? Not exactly. R region rows 6-7 columns 2-? Row6 columns 2-8 all R. Row7 columns 2-5 R, columns 6-7 B, column8 R. So R region is like a shape with a gap. But output shows transformation: Y region shifted left for upper part? Let's compare input vs output. Output rows 2-5: row2: B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B (same as input row2? Input row2: B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B. So Y at col2 moved to col1? Actually index: columns 0-11. Input row2: col0 B,1 B,2 Y,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 Y,7 Y,8 Y,9 B,10 B,11 B. Output row2: col0 B,1 Y,2 B,3 B,4 B,5 Y,6 Y,7 Y,8 B,9 B,10 B,11 B. So Y at col2 moved to col1 (left by 1). The block of three Y at cols6-8 moved to cols5-7 (left by 1). So upper story (Y) shifted left by 1 column. Now lower story (R) shift right by 1. Input rows6-7: row6: B B R R R R R R R B B B. Output row6: B B B R R R R R R R B B. So R block shifted right by 1 (col2->col3). Row7 input: B B R R R R B B R B B B. Output row7: B B B R R R R B B R B B. Let's see: original R at col2-5 shift to col3-6? Actually output row7: col0 B,1 B,2 B,3 R,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 R,10 B,11 B. So R at col2-5 moved to col3-6 (right 1). The isolated R at col8 stays at col9? Input col8 R becomes col9 R (right 1). Good. The gap (exposed foundation) becomes background B (same as foundation). So rule: For each structure composed of two colors (upper and lower), shift upper part left 1, lower part right 1, leaving background in between. Now need to detect structures: They are contiguous region of two colors stacked vertically ... [9452 chars truncated]
"A shield wall fractures under pressure: the front rank staggers left while the rear rank stumbles right, opening a fatal gap in the formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: On a featureless battlefield, formations are arrayed—each composed of a front rank colored one way and a rear rank colored another, meeting at a battle line.
Do: The ranks separate: the front rank displaces one position to the left, the rear rank one position to the right. Empty ground appears between them.
Grid: Battlefield dimensions hold. Gaps fill with the background terrain color.
"The stage splits for a dramatic reveal: the upper scenery flat slides into the left wing while the lower flat slides into the right wing, exposing the bare stage behind."
120b: k=2
See: Against a bare stage, scenic pieces stand—each a two-toned flat with an upper painted panel and a lower painted panel meeting at a horizontal seam.
Do: The scene changes: upper panels glide one space stage-left, lower panels glide one space stage-right. The bare stage shows through where the flats parted.
Grid: Stage dimensions remain the same. Revealed space is the bare stage background color.
We need to infer rule: "two-toned flat with an upper painted panel and a lower painted panel meeting at a horizontal seam." So each flat is a rectangle of two colors stacked vertically: top part color X, bottom part color Y, same width? In examples, we see shapes: In example1 input, there are colored blocks: Y region (yellow) appears as a rectangle? Let's examine. Example1 input grid 12x12. Colors: B background, Y region appears as a block of Y in rows 3-6 columns 3-9? Actually look: rows index starting 0? Let's map. Rows 0-1 all B. Row2: "B B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B". So Y at col2, col6-8. Row3 same. Row4: "B B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B". Row5 same. So Y region is like a shape with top row having a single Y at left side and three Y at right side, bottom rows full Y across columns 2-8. That's like two-toned flat? Actually maybe it's a "flat" where upper panel is Y? Wait there is also R region rows 6-7 etc. R region rows6: "B B R R R R R R R B B B". Row7: "B B R R R R B B R B B B". So R region shape similar to Y but offset? The transformation output moves upper panels left, lower panels right. So each flat consists of two horizontal halves: upper half (top rows) and lower half (bottom rows). Upper half moves left one column, lower half moves right one column, leaving background where they vacated. Let's test with Y region: In input, Y region occupies rows2-5 (4 rows). Upper half would be rows2-3 (top two rows). Lower half rows4-5 (bottom two rows). Upper half pattern: rows2-3 have Y at col2 and col6-8. Lower half rows4-5 have Y across col2-8. After transformation output: rows2-3 should have Y shifted left by 1: col1 and col5-7? Let's see output rows2-3: "B Y B B B Y Y Y B B B B". That's Y at col1 and col5-7. Indeed original upper half Y at col2 becomes col1 (left shift). Original Y at col6-8 become col5-7 (left shift). Good. Lower half rows4-5 shifted right by 1: output rows4-5: "B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B". That's Y at col2-8? Wait original lower half Y at col2-8. Shift right by 1 would be col3-9. But output shows Y at col2-8 (same as original). Let's check: row4 output: "B Y Y Y Y Y Y Y B B B B". That's Y from col2 to col8 inclusive (7 cells). That's same as original lower half (col2-8). Hmm maybe because rightmost column B? Let's compute shift: original lower half Y at columns 2-8 (7 cells). Shift right by 1 would be columns 3-9 (still 7 cells). But output shows columns 2-8, not shifted. Wait maybe the lower half moves right but also the upper half moves left, but they meet at seam? Actually the seam is horizontal middle; after moving, there may be overlap? Let's examine R region. Input R rows6-7: row6 (upper half) "B B R R R R R R R B B B" (R columns 2-8). row7 (lower half) "B B R R R R B B R B B B" (R columns 2-5,7). Output rows6: "B B B R R R R R R R B B". That's R columns 3-9? Actually output row6: "B B B R R R R R R R B B". So R at col3-9 (shift right by 1). That's lower half? Wait row6 is upper half originally, but after transformation it moved r ... [10498 chars truncated]
"An espalier tree's branches are trained apart—the upper canopy is guided one step along the left wire, the root stock leans one step along the right wire, spreading the plant across the trellis."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Against bare trellis, trained plants grow—each with an upper foliage color and a lower root color sharing a graft line.
Do: The gardener trains them: upper foliage shifts one cell left along the wire, lower roots shift one cell right. Bare trellis is exposed at the graft.
Grid: Trellis dimensions unchanged. Exposed cells revert to trellis background.
See: A 3×3 grid with R (red) always at the center cell (row 1, column 1). Three G (green) cells form a 2×2 block together with R, occupying one of the four corner quadrants of the grid. The remaining five cells are black (empty), forming an L-shape along the row and column not occupied by the 2×2 block.
Do: 1. Identify which corner quadrant the 2×2 block (R + 3 G cells) occupies. Note the row index (0 or 2) and column index (0 or 2) of the G cell diagonally opposite R within that block — call these gr and gc. 2. Identify the empty row (the row index, 0 or 2, not shared by the 2×2 block) and the empty column (likewise). 3. Create a 9×9 output grid filled with black. 4. Place a single empty divider: the empty row index × 4 gives the output row that stays black; the empty column index × 4 gives the output column that stays black. 5. The remaining 8 rows and 8 columns form a conceptual 2×2 arrangement of four 4×4 quadrants. Determine the diagonal: if gr and gc are the same (both 0 or both 2), the G diagonal is the main diagonal; if they differ, it is the anti-diagonal. 6. Fill the two 4×4 quadrants along that diagonal entirely with G.
Grid: Input is always 3×3 with values from {., R, G}. Output is always 9×9. The output contains exactly two 4×4 solid green blocks, one entirely empty row, one entirely empty column, and black elsewhere. The empty row and column each occupy one of positions 0, 4, or 8 in the output, corresponding to input positions 0, 1, or 2 scaled by 4.
"A seed planted in a garden corner grows twin canopies that shade the diagonal."
120b: k=1
See: A small 3×3 garden plot. A red seed sits at the very center, and three green sprouts huddle around it, forming a little square patch in one corner. The rest of the soil is bare — an empty row and an empty column form paths of untilled earth along two edges.
Do: The seed germinates and the garden expands into a vast 9×9 field. The two bare paths from the original plot widen into full irrigation channels — one horizontal, one vertical — that cut across the field, leaving it forever barren where they pass. The channels divide the field into four large planting quadrants. The green sprouts remember which diagonal of the original corner they grew from, and they send their canopy spreading across the two quadrants along that same diagonal, filling each one completely with lush green growth. The other two quadrants remain fallow.
Grid: The small plot is always 3×3 with one red seed, three green sprouts, and bare earth. The grown field is always 9×9. Two irrigation channels (one row, one column) stay barren, and exactly two of the four large quadrants burst into solid green canopy along the diagonal the sprouts originally faced.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 with R at center? In example1 input: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G So R at (2,2) (1-indexed). Greens: positions (2,3), (3,2), (3,3) forming a 2x2 block missing top-left? Actually they form a corner (bottom right) of 2x2 block with R at its top-left? Wait R at (2,2). Greens at (2,3) right of R, (3,2) below R, (3,3) diagonal down-right. So they form an L shape plus diagonal, basically a 2x2 square with R at top-left, greens fill other three cells. That's described as "three green sprouts huddle around it, forming a little square patch in one corner." Output is 9x9. Let's map. Output rows 1-9, columns 1-9. Given output grid (I'll index). Provided: Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G Interpretation: There is a vertical channel column? The barren (.) columns: column1 all ., column6 all .? Actually column1 all rows are . (yes). Column6 all rows are . (yes). So two channels: column1 and column6 (vertical). Also there is a horizontal channel row1? Row1 all . (yes). Row6? Row6 has . . . . . G G G G, not all . So horizontal channel is row1? Wait description said one horizontal, one vertical. In output, row1 is all . (horizontal channel). Column1 is all . (vertical channel). So they intersect at (1,1) top-left corner. Quadrants: The 9x9 divided by row1 and column1? Actually row1 and column1 split into quadrants: top-left quadrant is just cell (1,1) which is .; top-right quadrant rows1? Actually row1 is channel, so quadrants are below row1 and right of column1. So quadrants are: upper-left (rows 1? none), upper-right (rows 1? none), lower-left (rows 2-9, col1? column1 is channel, so none), lower-right (rows2-9, cols2-9) is the main area. But output shows green region in two quadrants: one is rows2-5, cols2-5 (a 4x4 block) filled with G. Another is rows6-9, cols6-9 (4x4 block) filled with G. So they are diagonal quadrants relative to the original corner? The original green corner was bottom-right of the 2x2 block. That corresponds to diagonal direction down-right from R. In output, the green fills quadrants that are down-right from the intersection? Actually the intersection is at (row1, col1). The quadrants relative to that are: top-left (none), top-right (rows1, cols2-9) but row1 is channel, so empty. bottom-left (rows2-9, col1) channel. bottom-right (rows2-9, cols2-9) is the main area. But they filled two sub-quadrants within that: rows2-5, cols2-5 (upper-left of bottom-right) and rows6-9, cols6-9 (lower-right). Those are along the main diagonal of the bottom-right quadrant. So they filled the two quadrants along the diagonal direction of original green corner (down-right). So they split the bottom-right quadrant into four 4x4 sub-quadrants (since 8x8 area). They filled the ones that are along the same diagonal as the original green ... [8777 chars truncated]
"A red nucleus sits at the heart of a cell, flanked by green organelles clustering in one lobe. During mitosis, the nucleus dissolves and each organelle colony multiplies into a full tissue mass — but only along the axis the original cluster pointed toward, leaving a membrane gap where the empty cytoplasm once was."
120b: fail
See: A cell with a red nucleus at center and green organelles huddled in one quadrant, surrounded by empty cytoplasm.
Do: The nucleus triggers division: the green cluster's diagonal orientation determines which two opposite lobes swell into full tissue blocks, separated by a thin membrane channel where the vacant space once was.
Grid: Input: 3×3 cell. Output: 9×9 organism. Two 4×4 green tissue masses on the diagonal the organelles indicated, with one blank row and one blank column forming the membrane.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 9x9. Example given: Input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output 9x9 shown. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green tissue masses on diagonal indicated by green cluster orientation. Input has red nucleus at (2,2) (0-index? row2 col2). Green organelles at positions (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's a 2x2 block of G at bottom right corner of input (rows2-3, cols2-3) but missing (2,2) which is R. Actually coordinates: using 1-index rows/cols. Input matrix: (1,1) . (1,2) . (1,3) . (2,1) . (2,2) R (2,3) G (3,1) . (3,2) G (3,3) G So green cluster forms an L shape? Actually positions: (2,3) top right of cluster, (3,2) bottom left, (3,3) bottom right. That's a diagonal orientation? The description says diagonal orientation determines which two opposite lobes swell. Output: 9x9 grid. Let's view output rows. Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So we have two 4x4 green blocks: one at rows2-5, cols2-5 (top-left block). Another at rows6-9, cols6-9 (bottom-right block). There's a blank row (row6?) Actually row6 has . . . . . G G G G: first 5 columns blank, then 4 G. So row6 is the separating row? Wait blank row between blocks: The first block occupies rows2-5, columns2-5. The second block occupies rows6-9, columns6-9. There's a blank column between them: columns1? Actually column1 all blanks. Column6? In rows2-5 column6 is . . . . . So column6 is blank for first block rows. So there is a blank column (col6) separating? Let's map coordinates: 9x9 indices 1-9. Block A: rows2-5, cols2-5 (size4). Block B: rows6-9, cols6-9 (size4). The blank row is row6? Actually row6 contains block B starting at col6, but rows2-5 have blanks at col6-9. So the "membrane channel" is the row6 and column6? Actually there is a blank row (row6) for columns1-5, and blank column (col6) for rows2-5. So they intersect at (row6,col6) which is also blank? In output row6 col6 is G (since block B includes row6 col6). Wait row6 col6 is G (since block B rows6-9, cols6-9). So the blank row is row6 only for first block area, but block B occupies that row from col6 onward. So the "membrane channel" maybe the row5? Let's think. But description: "two opposite lobes swell into full tissue blocks, separated by a thin membrane channel where the vacant space once was." In input there is vacant space (blank) region maybe the top-left area? Actually input has many blanks. The rule likely: Identify the diagonal direction of the green cluster relative to red nucleus. Then create two 4x4 green blocks placed in opposite corners of the 9x9 output, aligned along that diagonal, leaving a blank row and column separating them (forming a channel). The red maybe disappears? In output there is no red. Only green and blanks. Thus transformation: Input 3x3 with red at center (may ... [8823 chars truncated]
"A red dwarf star anchors the center of a small nebula while green gas clouds condense in one quadrant. As the nebula expands, two green stellar nurseries ignite along the diagonal the gas first drifted toward, separated by a dark void lane where the nebula had no matter."
120b: fail
See: A small nebula with a red star at center and green gas condensed in one quadrant.
Do: The nebula expands: two stellar nurseries form along the gas cloud's diagonal, with a dark void row and column where the original nebula was empty.
Grid: Input: 3×3 nebula. Output: 9×9 star field. Two 4×4 green nurseries on the diagonal, one void row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown 9x9. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green nurseries on diagonal, one void row and column where original nebula was empty. Let's examine output. I'll write output rows (9 rows each 9 columns). Provided: Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So pattern: top-left 5x5 region? Actually first column all '.' (col1). Row1 all '.'. We see a 4x4 block of G starting at (row2,col2) to (row5,col5). That's a green block. Another 4x4 block of G starting at (row6,col6) to (row9,col9). That's diagonal second block. The void row and column where original nebula was empty: original input had many '.'? Input had '.' in many cells. The original nebula empty maybe row1 and column1? Indeed input first row all '.' and first column all '.' (since column1: ., ., .). So void row and column correspond to first row and first column in output being all '.' (row1 all '.'; column1 all '.'), and also maybe row6? Wait void row/column where original nebula was empty: original empty cells maybe those that were '.'? But many '.' in input: positions (1,1),(1,2),(1,3),(2,1),(3,1). That's a cross shape: first row and first column. In output we see row1 all '.' and column1 all '.' (makes sense). Also there is a void row and column maybe at offset? Actually output also has a void row/column at row6? No row6 has '.' in first five columns, then G block. So not void. Thus rule: Expand 3x3 to 9x9 by scaling factor 3? But blocks are 4x4 not 3x3. Let's think: Input has a red star at (2,2) and green gas at (2,3),(3,2),(3,3). Output shows green blocks but no red. Red disappears? In output there is no red. So maybe red indicates center of each block? Actually red maybe indicates where to place the second block? Not present. Maybe rule: For each non-empty cell (non '.'), create a 4x4 block of its color placed in output at positions determined by something. The red cell maybe indicates a "seed" for second block? But output only has green blocks, not red. Input green cells: positions (2,3),(3,2),(3,3). That's three green cells forming an L shape. Output has two 4x4 green blocks. So not one-to-one. Maybe rule: Identify the bounding box of non-'.' cells (excluding red?) The green region forms a 2x2 block at bottom right of input (rows2-3, cols2-3) except missing (2,2) which is red. So shape is a 2x2 with one red at top-left of that block. Output: two 4x4 green blocks placed on diagonal, maybe each corresponds to each quadrant of original? The red indicates the diagonal direction? Hmm. Let's test with test input: . G G . R G . . . We need to produce output. We need to deduce rule more concretely. Observation: Output size 9 = 3*3? Actually 3x3 input -> 9x9 output (sca ... [5389 chars truncated]
"A red buoy marks the center of a small harbor chart while green algae blooms cluster in one cove. As tides expand the chart, two vast algae fields spread to opposite coves along the diagonal the bloom first favored. The deep channel — where the chart showed open water — cuts cleanly through."
120b: fail
See: A small harbor chart with a red buoy at center and green algae in one cove corner.
Do: Tides expand the chart: two algae fields fill opposite coves on the bloom's diagonal. The open-water channel becomes a clear row and column dividing them.
Grid: Input: 3×3 chart. Output: 9×9 sea map. Two 4×4 green algae blocks on the diagonal, one channel row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown 9x9. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, channel row and column dividing them. Input has red at (2,2) (center) and green at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). So a 2x2 green block at bottom right corner of input? Actually positions: (row2,col3), (row3,col2), (row3,col3) - that's an L shape missing (2,2) which is red. So maybe the rule: take the pattern of green cells (excluding red) and expand them into larger blocks in output. Output: Let's examine output grid (9x9). Provided as rows: Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So there is a 4x4 green block at rows2-5, cols2-5 (since row2 col2 is G). Another 4x4 green block at rows6-9, cols6-9. The rest are black '.'. Thus two blocks on diagonal separated by a clear row and column (row6? Actually column6? The dividing line is row6? Wait row6 has '.' in first 5 columns then G block starts at col6. So the dividing line is row6 and column6? Actually row6 col1-5 are '.'; row6 col6-9 are G. So the dividing line is row6 (first 5 columns) and column6 (first 5 rows). So a clear row and column of '.' separate the two blocks. How does input map? Input size 3, output 9 = 3*3. So scaling factor 3? But blocks are 4x4 not 3x3. Hmm. Maybe rule: Identify the red cell as center, then expand green cells outward to fill a quadrant? The red at (2,2) maybe becomes the dividing row/column? In output, the dividing row/column is at index 5? Actually zero-index? Let's think: Input 3x3, output 9x9. Possibly each input cell becomes a 3x3 block? That would give 9x9. Let's test: Input cell (i,j) maps to 3x3 region in output. The red cell maybe becomes a 3x3 region of '.' (clear channel). The green cells become 3x3 region of green? But output shows 4x4 blocks, not 3x3. Let's map: Input coordinates (1-index). Red at (2,2). In output, the dividing row/col of '.' maybe corresponds to the red cell region. If each input cell expands to 3x3, then red cell would become a 3x3 block of '.' at rows ( (2-1)*3+1 =4 ) to 6, columns 4-6. But output shows '.' region at rows1? Actually output rows1-5 col1-5 are '.' except green block occupies rows2-5 col2-5. So not matching. Alternative: The output is composed of two 4x4 green blocks placed at opposite corners (top-left? Actually top-left block is at rows2-5 col2-5, not corner). That's offset by one from top-left. So maybe the rule: take the shape of green cells in input (excluding red) and replicate it scaled up by factor 4? Input green shape is L of three cells. Output green shape is two 4x4 squares (i.e., 16 cells each). Not matching. Maybe the rule: The red cell indicates a pivot; we create a diagonal of green blocks of size (n-1?) where n is input size? Inp ... [6217 chars truncated]
"A red LED sits at the center of a small circuit board while green capacitors are soldered in one corner cluster. When the board is scaled to production, two green capacitor banks populate opposing quadrants along the trace diagonal the cluster pointed toward. The bus lines where no components sat become the empty power rails."
120b: k=2
See: A small PCB with a red LED at center and green capacitors clustered in one corner.
Do: Scale to production: two capacitor banks fill opposing quadrants along the cluster's diagonal trace. The empty bus lines become unpopulated power rail row and column.
Grid: Input: 3×3 PCB. Output: 9×9 production board. Two 4×4 green banks on the diagonal, one empty row and column as rails.
We need to infer transformation rule from examples. We have 3x3 input to 9x9 output. The description: small PCB with red LED at center and green capacitors clustered in one corner. Output: two 4x4 green banks on the diagonal, one empty row and column as rails. Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid (3x3): Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Let's label coordinates (r,c) 0-index. Input: (0,0)=., (0,1)=., (0,2)=. (1,0)=., (1,1)=R, (1,2)=G (2,0)=., (2,1)=G, (2,2)=G Output 9x9 given: Let's write rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . G G G G . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . . . . . G G G G Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Observations: Output has two 4x4 green blocks: top-left? Actually block at rows1-4, cols1-4 (since row1 col1 is G). That's a 4x4 block of G. Another block at rows5-8, cols5-8 (since row5 col5 is G). That's also 4x4 block of G. The rest are '.' (black). So two green squares on diagonal quadrants, each 4x4, separated by a row and column of '.' (the 0th row/col and the 4th row/col? Let's see). The empty row and column are row0 and col0? Actually row0 is all '.'; col0 is all '.' (since first column all '.'), also row4? Wait row4 has . G G G G . . . . So row4 has G's at cols1-4, not empty. So the empty row is row0? And empty column is col0? But description says empty bus lines become unpopulated power rail row and column. In output there is a row of '.' at top (row0) and a column of '.' at left (col0). So they act as rails. Now mapping from input: Input had green cluster in bottom-right corner (positions (1,2),(2,1),(2,2)). Red at (1,1). Output: green blocks placed in quadrants opposite? Let's see: The green block appears in top-left quadrant (rows1-4, cols1-4). That's opposite diagonal from where cluster originally? Input cluster is bottom-right corner of 3x3 (excluding top-left). The output block appears top-left. Also second green block appears bottom-right quadrant (rows5-8, cols5-8). So maybe we replicate the green cluster into two quadrants: one opposite (mirrored) and one same location? Let's examine Example2. Example2 Input: Row0: G G . Row1: G R . Row2: . . . Coordinates: green at (0,0),(0,1),(1,0). Red at (1,1). Output 9x9: Rows0-3: G G G G . . . . . Rows0-3 each first 4 columns G, rest '.'. Rows4-7: . . . . G G G G . Rows4-7 each columns4-7 G, column8 '.'. Row8: all '.'. So output has a 4x4 green block at top-left (rows0-3, cols0-3). Another 4x4 green block at rows4-7, cols4-7. The rest '.'. Thus similar pattern: two green 4x4 blocks on diagonal, with empty row and column (maybe row4? Actually row4 has . . . . G G G G . So row4 has G's at cols4-7, not empty. The empty row is row8? Actually row8 all '.'; empty column is col8? column8 all '.'. So the empty row/col are the last row and column (index 8). In Example1 empty row/col were first row/col (index0). So maybe the empty row/col correspond to location of red LED ... [11313 chars truncated]
"A red oracle sits at the crossroads while green spirits gather in one quarter of the sacred grove. When the ritual magnifies the grove, two spirit hosts manifest in opposing sanctuaries along the diagonal the spirits first haunted. The ley lines where the grove was barren remain as silent boundaries."
120b: fail
See: A sacred grove with a red oracle at the crossroads and green spirits gathered in one quarter.
Do: The ritual expands: two spirit hosts fill opposing sanctuaries along the haunted diagonal. The barren ley lines become silent boundary row and column.
Grid: Input: 3×3 grove. Output: 9×9 sanctum. Two 4×4 green spirit blocks on the diagonal, one ley-line row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown 9x9. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, one empty row and column (ley line). The description: "two spirit hosts fill opposing sanctuaries along the haunted diagonal. The barren ley lines become silent boundary row and column." Interpretation: Input has a red oracle at crossroads (R) and green spirits gathered in one quarter (some G's). Output expands to 9x9 with two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal (maybe top-left and bottom-right?), and a row and column of black (.)? Actually output shows many '.' and G. Let's write output matrix coordinates 0-8. Given output lines: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . G G G G . . . . 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G 9: . . . . . G G G G So top-left 4x4 block of G starting at (1,1) (0-index?). Actually rows 2-5, cols 2-5 are G. That's a 4x4 block offset by one row/col from top-left (since first row and column are all .). Similarly bottom-right 4x4 block of G at rows 6-9, cols 6-9. So there is a row of . (first row) and column of . (first column) acting as boundary. Also there is a column of . at col5? Wait columns: first 5 columns? Let's view grid: columns 1-9. Rows 1: all . Row2: col1 ., col2-5 G, col6-9 . Row3 same Row4 same Row5 same Row6: col1-5 ., col6-9 G Rows7-9 same. Thus there is a vertical line of . at col5? Actually col5 is G for rows2-5, and . for rows6-9. So the boundary between blocks is at row6 and col6? The pattern: top-left block occupies rows2-5, cols2-5. bottom-right block rows6-9, cols6-9. So there is a separating row (row6) and column (col6) that are all .? Row6 has . . . . . G G G G (first five .). So row6 first five . then G block. So row6 is not all .; column6 has . for rows1-5 then G for rows6-9. So the "barren ley lines become silent boundary row and column" maybe refer to the row and column that were originally empty in input? Input had first column all . (since column1: ., ., .). Also first row all . . . . Actually input first row all . . . . So those become the boundary row and column in output (the first row and first column). Indeed output first row all ., first column all . (col1). So they are the "barren ley lines". Good. Now the green blocks: Input had green in lower right quarter (positions (2,3), (3,2), (3,3) using 1-index). That's a 2x2-ish shape? Actually input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G So green cells at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's a 2x2 block missing top-left cell (2,2) which is R. So green shape is like an L shape? But output has 4x4 green blocks. So maybe each green cell expands to a 2x2 block? Let's test: Input green count =3. Output green count = 4x4*2 = 32 cells. That's not simple. Maybe rule: Take the pattern of non-blank cells (R and G) and embed it into larger grid where the original empty row/col ... [6031 chars truncated]
"A red lead dancer holds center floor while green chorus dancers cluster in one corner formation. When the finale opens the grand ballroom, two full chorus formations mirror each other across the diagonal the dancers first leaned toward. The promenade lanes where no one stood remain as open floor."
120b: k=1
See: A small floor with a red lead at center and green chorus in one corner formation.
Do: Grand finale: two full chorus blocks fill opposing corners along the formation's diagonal. The open promenade lanes become empty row and column.
Grid: Input: 3×3 floor. Output: 9×9 ballroom. Two 4×4 green chorus blocks on the diagonal, one promenade row and column.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output 9x9 shown. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, one empty row and column (promenade lanes). Input has red lead at center? In example, red at (2,2) (0-index? Actually row2 col2). Green chorus in corner formation: there is a shape of greens in lower right corner? Input has G at (2,3) and (3,2),(3,3). That's like an L shape? Actually coordinates: using 1-index rows, cols. Input: (1,1) . (1,2) . (1,3) . (2,1) . (2,2) R (2,3) G (3,1) . (3,2) G (3,3) G So green forms a 2x2 block missing top-left (2,2) is red, (2,3) G, (3,2) G, (3,3) G (so three greens making a corner shape). Red at (2,2) center of that 2x2? Not exactly center of grid (center would be (2,2) indeed). So red at center. Output 9x9: Let's view rows. Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So we have a 4x4 green block at rows2-5, cols2-5 (top-left block). Another 4x4 green block at rows6-9, cols6-9 (bottom-right block). The rest are black (.) except row1 and col1 all black, also row6-9 col1-5 black, rows2-5 col6-9 black, etc. So there is an empty row and column? Actually there is a "promenade lane" empty row and column: row1 is empty, column1 is empty. Also there is a gap between the two blocks: rows2-5 col6-9 are empty, rows6-9 col2-5 empty. So shape is like two blocks placed on diagonal with a blank row and column separating them (the first row and column). So transformation: Input 3x3 with red at center and green L shape maybe indicates size of blocks? The output blocks are 4x4. How derived? Input size 3 => output size 9 = 3*3? Actually 3x3 to 9x9 scaling factor 3. But blocks are 4x4 not 3x3. Maybe block size = input dimension +1? 3+1=4. Yes. The green shape maybe indicates orientation: The green corner shape (like a 2x2 missing top-left) indicates that the blocks should be placed on diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? The empty row/col correspond to the position of the red? Red at center maybe indicates that the empty row/col is the first row/col? Not sure. Let's test with test input: Test Input: . G G . R G . . . Rows: 1: . G G 2: . R G 3: . . . Green positions: (1,2),(1,3),(2,3). That's a different corner shape: top-right corner of a 2x2? Actually shape of three greens forming an L rotated: missing (2,2) which is red, (2,3) G, (1,2) G, (1,3) G. That's like a corner at top-right. In example, greens were at (2,3),(3,2),(3,3) which is bottom-right corner shape (missing top-left). So orientation changed. Output likely will have two 4x4 green blocks placed on opposite corners along diagonal? The description: "two full chorus blocks fill opposing corners along the formation's diagonal." In example, blocks were at top-left and bottom-right corners (opposing ... [5679 chars truncated]
"A red magma vent sits at the center of a small tectonic plate while green mineral deposits crystallize in one corner. As the plate spreads, two vast mineral fields emerge along the diagonal the crystals first seeded, separated by a rift valley — the barren fault line where the plate had nothing."
120b: fail
See: A small plate with a red vent at center and green mineral crystals in one corner.
Do: Plate spreads: two mineral fields crystallize on the seeded diagonal. The barren fault lines become a rift valley row and column.
Grid: Input: 3×3 plate. Output: 9×9 geological map. Two 4×4 green mineral blocks on the diagonal, one rift row and column.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input 3x3: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output 9x9. Let's map coordinates. Output seems to have two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, and a rift row and column (maybe red line?). Let's view output matrix. I'll write rows (0-index). Output rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . 1: . G G G G . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . . . . . G G G G 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . . . . . Interpretation: There is a 4x4 green block at rows1-4, cols1-4 (since row1 col1-4 are G). Another 4x4 green block at rows5-8, cols5-8 (since row5 col5-8 are G). The rest are . except maybe some . at row0 and col0 etc. So pattern: Input had red at (1,1?) Let's index input rows 0-2, cols0-2. Input: (0,0)=., (0,1)=., (0,2)=. (1,0)=., (1,1)=R, (1,2)=G (2,0)=., (2,1)=G, (2,2)=G So red at (1,1) center? Actually center of 3x3 is (1,1). Yes red at center. Green cluster in bottom right corner (positions (1,2),(2,1),(2,2)). That's a 2x2 L shape? Actually it's a 2x2 block missing (1,1) which is red. So green occupies the three cells of that 2x2 block except the top-left of that block (which is red). So basically a 2x2 green block with red at its top-left corner? Wait coordinates: The 2x2 block covering rows1-2, cols1-2 includes cells: (1,1)=R, (1,2)=G, (2,1)=G, (2,2)=G. So yes red at top-left of that 2x2 block, rest green. Now output: two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal. The red seems to become a "rift row and column" maybe a row and column of .? Actually output has . in row0 and col0 and row8 and col8? Let's see: row0 all .; col0 all .; row8 all .; col8 all .? Row8 all . yes. Column8 all .? Let's check rows: row0 col8 .; row1 col8 .; row2 col8 .; row3 col8 .; row4 col8 .; row5 col8 .; row6 col8 .; row7 col8 .; row8 col8 . So column8 all . . So there is a border of . around? Actually output is 9x9 with . border of width1 around the two 4x4 green blocks placed at (1-4,1-4) and (5-8,5-8). So they are separated by a row and column of .? Let's see row5 col0-4 are .; row5 col5-8 are G. Row4 col5-8 are . (since row4 col5-8 .). So there is a . row (row4?) Actually row4 has G at cols1-4, rest . So row4 col5-8 . So the gap between the two blocks is row5? Wait block1 occupies rows1-4, cols1-4. Block2 occupies rows5-8, cols5-8. So there is a row5? Actually block2 starts at row5, col5. So rows5-8, cols5-8. So there is a gap of one row (row5?) No row5 is part of block2. The gap between blocks is rows? The blocks are offset diagonally, not adjacent. So there is a "rift row and column" maybe the row and column that correspond to the red cell location? In input red at (1,1) relative to 3x3. In output, the rift row and column are the row and column that are all .? Which are row0 and col0? Or row4 and col4? Let's examine: row0 all . (top border). col0 all . (left border). Also row8 and col8 bottom/right border. But maybe the rift is the row and column that intersect at the red cell's p ... [9487 chars truncated]
"A red chili pepper rests on a cutting board beside a cluster of green herbs. When plated, the herbs are portioned into two generous servings placed at opposite corners of a large square plate, following the angle the herbs originally leaned toward. The bare board lines — where nothing grew — become the clean dividers between courses."
120b: k=2
See: A small cutting board with a red chili at center and green herbs bunched in one corner area, the rest bare.
Do: Plate the dish on a larger square: the herbs expand into two large equal portions mirrored along the diagonal the bunch suggested, with clean lines of empty plate where the bare strips were.
Grid: Input: 3×3 board. Output: 9×9 plate. Two 4×4 herb portions on the indicated diagonal, separated by one empty row and column.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input 3x3: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output 9x9. Let's map coordinates. Output seems to have two 4x4 blocks of G (green) placed: top-left block? Let's view output matrix. I'll write rows 1-9: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . G G G G . . . . 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G 9: . . . . . G G G G So there is a 4x4 green block at rows2-5, cols2-5. And another 4x4 green block at rows6-9, cols6-9. They are separated by one empty row (row6? actually row6 has block start at col6, but row6 col1-5 are .). Also one empty column between blocks (col6? Wait block1 ends at col5, block2 starts at col6, so no empty column; but there is empty column? Actually row2 col6 is ., row2 col1 is ., etc. So there is a column of . at col1 and col6? Let's examine: block1 occupies cols2-5. So col1 is empty, col6-9 block2 occupies cols6-9, so there is no empty column between them; they are adjacent horizontally? But description said separated by one empty row and column. Let's check: block2 starts at col6, so column5 is last of block1, column6 first of block2, no empty column. However there is empty column at col1 (left of block1). Maybe they meant separated by one empty row and column from the edges? Let's examine pattern: The input had red at (2,2) (using 1-index). Green at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). So a 2x2 green L shape? Actually shape: positions (2,3), (3,2), (3,3) are G, plus red at (2,2). So a 2x2 block of G missing top-left cell (which is red). The output shows two 4x4 green blocks. So scaling factor 4? Input size 3 -> output 9 (scale factor 3). But block size 4? Hmm. Maybe rule: take the pattern of non-black cells (R and G) and expand each cell into a 3x3 block? Let's test. Input 3x3, output 9x9 (scale factor 3). If each input cell becomes a 3x3 region. Let's map: Input cell (i,j) maps to output rows (3i-2 to 3i) and cols (3j-2 to 3j). Let's see: Input (2,2) is R. In output rows 4-6, cols 4-6 should be R block? But output shows green block at rows2-5 cols2-5 etc. Not matching. Maybe rule: Identify the "herb bunch" which is green cluster, expand it into larger squares placed along diagonal indicated by its orientation. In example1, green cluster occupies positions (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's like a 2x2 square missing top-left (which is red). The diagonal from top-left to bottom-right of the 3x3 board passes through (1,1),(2,2),(3,3). The green cluster is near bottom-right corner. The output places a 4x4 green block in top-left? Actually block at rows2-5 cols2-5 is near top-left but offset by one. That's maybe the "herb bunch" expanded and mirrored across diagonal? Let's examine example2. Example2 Input: Row1: G G . Row2: G R . Row3: . . . So green at (1,1),(1,2),(2,1). Red at (2,2). That's a 2x2 green block missing bottom-right (which is red). So similar shape but rotated? Output 9x9: Rows1-4 cols1-4 are G block ... [9452 chars truncated]
"A red conductor stands at the podium while green musicians cluster to one side of a small rehearsal room. In the concert hall, two full orchestral sections swell into opposite balconies along the acoustic axis the musicians first leaned toward. The silent corridors between them carry no sound."
120b: fail
See: A small room with a red conductor at center and green musicians grouped in one corner section, the rest silent.
Do: Expand into the concert hall: the musicians fill two grand balcony sections on the diagonal they originally clustered toward. The empty aisles become silent dividing corridors.
Grid: Input: 3×3 rehearsal room. Output: 9×9 concert hall. Two 4×4 orchestral blocks on the implied diagonal, silent corridor row and column between.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input 3x3: Row0: . . . Row1: . R G Row2: . G G Output 9x9. Let's map coordinates. Input has red at (1,1) (center?) Actually coordinates (row, col). Green cluster at bottom right corner: positions (1,2), (2,1), (2,2) - three greens forming L shape? Actually (1,2) G, (2,1) G, (2,2) G. That's a 2x2 block missing (1,1) which is R. So green cluster in corner (bottom right). Output shows two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal? Let's view output. Output rows (0-8): 0: . . . . . . . . . 1: . G G G G . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . . . . . G G G G 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G So there is a 4x4 green block at rows1-4, cols1-4 (top-left?) Actually row1-4, col1-4 (since col0 is .). That's block1. Another 4x4 block at rows5-8, cols5-8 (bottom-right). So diagonal from top-left to bottom-right, with a silent corridor row4? Wait there is a row of . at row0 and column0 and also row5? Actually row0 all ., col0 all ., also row5 col0-4 are . etc. The two blocks are separated by a single row and column of .? Let's see: block1 occupies rows1-4, cols1-4. block2 occupies rows5-8, cols5-8. So there is a gap of one row (row5?) Actually row5 is start of block2, but row5 also has . in cols0-4, and G in cols5-8. So the gap between blocks is row5? Wait block1 ends at row4, block2 starts at row5, so they are adjacent vertically (no empty row). But there is a column gap: block1 ends at col4, block2 starts at col5, adjacent horizontally. So they touch at corner? Actually they are separated by a single column and row of .? Not exactly. Let's examine row4: row4 is ". G G G G . . . .". So row4 has G in cols1-4, rest . So row4 is last row of block1. Row5: ". . . . . G G G G". So row5 has . in cols0-4, G in 5-8. So there is a . column at col0-4 for rows5-8. So there is a vertical corridor of . between blocks (col0-4 rows5-8). Similarly horizontal corridor of . between blocks (row0 and row5? Actually row0 all ., row5 has . in left side). So basically we have a 9x9 grid divided into 3x3 macro cells each of size 3? Wait 9 = 3*3. Input 3x3 becomes 9x9 by scaling factor 3? But blocks are 4x4 not 3x3. Hmm. Maybe rule: take the pattern of green cluster (size 2x2 missing top-left) and expand to 4x4 blocks placed on diagonal positions corresponding to original green positions? In input, green cells are at (1,2), (2,1), (2,2). That's three cells forming shape of a 2x2 block missing top-left. In output, we have two 4x4 blocks of green. How does that map? Perhaps each green cell becomes a 4x4 block? But there are three green cells, but only two blocks appear. So not. Maybe rule: Identify the corner where green cluster is located (bottom right). Then create two 4x4 green squares on the diagonal that extends from that corner towards opposite corner? In example1, green cluster in bottom right corner of 3x3 (positions near bottom right). Output has green blocks on top ... [12006 chars truncated]
"A red referee stands at midfield while green players huddle in one corner of a practice pitch. When the full stadium opens, two fan sections erupt in green along whichever diagonal the players' huddle pointed toward. The empty stands and the sideline lane remain dark."
120b: fail
See: A small pitch with a red referee at center and green players clustered in one corner zone.
Do: Scale up to the stadium: the green energy fills two opposite grandstand blocks along the diagonal the huddle indicated, while the unused lane and empty row of seats stay dark.
Grid: Input: 3×3 practice pitch. Output: 9×9 stadium. Two 4×4 green fan blocks on the diagonal, one dark row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown: 9x9 with pattern: top-left 4x4 block of G? Let's map. Output rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . G G G G . . . . 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G 9: . . . . . G G G G Interpretation: There is a 4x4 green block at rows2-5, cols2-5. And another 4x4 green block at rows6-9, cols6-9. The rest are black (.) . So two diagonal blocks offset: first block starts at (2,2) size4, second at (6,6) size4. There is a dark row and column? The description says one dark row and column stay dark. Indeed column1 all . and row1 all . and also column6? Wait column6 has . in rows1-5, but rows6-9 have G. So column6 not all dark. Actually dark row maybe row1? And dark column maybe col1? Yes. Now how derived from input? Input has red at (2,2) (if 1-indexed). Actually input rows: row2 col2 = R, row2 col3 = G, row3 col2 = G, row3 col3 = G. So a 2x2 green L shape plus red at top-left of that shape. The output seems to expand green region into 4x4 blocks placed along diagonal based on something. Perhaps each green cell becomes a 2x2 block? Let's test: Input green cells at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's three greens. Output has 8x8? Actually 4x4 blocks total 32 green cells. Not matching. Maybe rule: Identify the smallest bounding box containing all non-black cells (R and G). In input, bounding box rows2-3, cols2-3 (size2). Then output is 3x larger? Actually output size is 9 (3*3). So scaling factor 3. The green region (excluding red) is scaled to fill two opposite quadrants? Let's think: The green cluster is in bottom-right corner of the 2x2 box (since red at top-left). In output, green blocks appear in two opposite corners of the 9x9: top-left block (starting at (2,2)) and bottom-right block (starting at (6,6)). That's like replicating the pattern rotated 180 degrees? The red maybe indicates orientation? The red at center of input? Actually red at (2,2) relative to box top-left (1,1). So red is top-left of the 2x2 box. In output, the dark row/col correspond to the row and column of the red? In output, row1 and column1 are dark (all .). That matches red being at (1,1) of the 3x3? Not exactly. Maybe rule: Take the input 3x3, treat it as a pattern to upscale to 9x9 by replacing each cell with a 3x3 block: '.' becomes 3x3 of '.'; 'R' becomes something? But output shows no red. So red maybe becomes the dark row/col (i.e., a line of '.' across). In output, there is a full row of '.' at top (row1) and column of '.' at left (col1). That's like the red cell expands to a full row and column of '.'? In input, red at (2,2). In output, row1 and column1 correspond to that? Not aligning. Let's map scaling factor: Input size 3 -> output 9, factor 3. So each input cell maps to a 3x3 region. Let's test: Input cell (1,1) is '.' -> output rows1-3, cols1-3 should be ... [2790 chars truncated]
"A red pressure center sits in the eye of a small weather cell, with green storm clouds massing in one quadrant. As the system expands, twin storm fronts bloom along the diagonal the clouds originally favored, while the clear-sky band where no moisture gathered becomes a calm corridor cutting through the larger system."
120b: fail
See: A small weather map with a red pressure center and green storm clouds in one quadrant corner.
Do: The system expands: two large storm zones form on the diagonal the clouds indicated, separated by a clear-sky corridor aligned with where the original map was empty.
Grid: Input: 3×3 weather cell. Output: 9×9 system map. Two 4×4 green storm blocks on the diagonal, one clear row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown 9x9. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, separated by clear row/column (black .). The original red maybe indicates center? Let's reconstruct. Output grid rows (9 rows each 9 columns). Provided: Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So top-left 4x4 block of G starting at (row2,col2) to (row5,col5). Bottom-right 4x4 block of G starting at (row6,col6) to (row9,col9). The rest are . (black). So indeed two diagonal blocks. Now how derived from input? Input has red at (2,2) (using 1-index). Actually input rows: row2 col2 = R, row2 col3 = G, row3 col2 = G, row3 col3 = G. So a 2x2 subgrid of bottom-right corner of input contains R G; G G. That's like a shape: red at top-left of that 2x2, rest green. The output seems to expand that shape into larger blocks: The red disappears? In output there is no red. Only green blocks. The red maybe indicates the "origin" of expansion? The rule: take the pattern of non-black cells (R and G) in input, treat R as anchor point, expand green region outward to form two diagonal blocks of size (input size *?). Specifically, input size 3, output size 9 = 3*3. So scaling factor 3. The green region (including red?) maybe scaled up 3x each dimension, but only green appears. The red maybe becomes the clear corridor (the row/col of .). Indeed the clear corridor is row1? Actually corridor is first row and first column? In output, the first row and first column are all . (black). Also column5? Wait there is a clear column at col5? Let's see: columns 1-5? Actually block occupies columns 2-5 for top-left block, and columns 6-9 for bottom-right block. So column5 is part of top-left block (col5). The clear corridor is row1 and column1? Also there is a clear area between blocks: rows 1-5 columns6-9 are . (top-right quadrant) and rows6-9 columns1-5 are . (bottom-left). So the clear corridor is the off-diagonal quadrants. Thus rule: Input 3x3 with a pattern in lower-right 2x2 (R and G). Output 9x9 with two 4x4 green blocks placed on diagonal, each block size = (input size -1?) Actually block size 4 = input size +1? Input size 3, block size 4 = 3+1. Maybe block size = number of rows containing any non-black in input? Input non-black cells are at positions (2,2),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3) => a 2x2 region. So block size = that region size +2? Not sure. Let's test with test input: . G G . R G . . . Rows: 1: . G G 2: . R G 3: . . . Non-black cells: G at (1,2),(1,3),(2,3); R at (2,2). So shape is like an L? Let's map coordinates relative to top-left of non-empty region? The region maybe bounding box of non-black: rows 1-2, cols 2-3 => size 2x2. Within that, pattern: (1,2) G (relative (1,1)) (1,3) G ... [2739 chars truncated]
"A red keystone sits at the center of a small blueprint, with green foundation stones laid in one corner. When the building is erected at full scale, two green wings rise along the diagonal the foundation pointed toward, separated by an open-air atrium corridor where the blueprint showed bare ground."
120b: fail
See: A small blueprint with a red keystone at center and green foundation blocks in one corner quadrant.
Do: Build at full scale: two grand wings in green rise along the foundation's diagonal, with an open atrium row and corridor column where there was bare ground.
Grid: Input: 3×3 blueprint. Output: 9×9 building plan. Two 4×4 green wings on the diagonal, one open row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown 9x9. Let's map. We need to see pattern: Two 4x4 green wings on diagonal, open row and column where there was bare ground. The description: small blueprint with red keystone at center and green foundation blocks in one corner quadrant. Build at full scale: two grand wings in green rise along the foundation's diagonal, with an open atrium row and corridor column where there was bare ground. Interpretation: Input has red at (2,2) (center of 3x3). Green blocks in lower right quadrant? Let's index rows 1-3, cols 1-3. Input green at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's a 2x2 block missing (2,2) which is red, plus an extra at (2,3). Actually shape: bottom right 2x2 all green except top-left of that block is red? Wait bottom right 2x2 positions: (2,2) red, (2,3) green, (3,2) green, (3,3) green. So a 2x2 with red at top-left, rest green. Output 9x9: Let's view output rows. Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G G G . . . . Row3: . G G G G . . . . Row4: . G G G G . . . . Row5: . G G G G . . . . Row6: . . . . . G G G G Row7: . . . . . G G G G Row8: . . . . . G G G G Row9: . . . . . G G G G So output has two 4x4 green squares: one at rows2-5, cols2-5 (top-left of output). Another at rows6-9, cols6-9 (bottom-right). The rest are black (.) . There's also a column of black at col1 and row1 and column6-9? Actually row1 all black. Column1 all black. Also a gap: rows2-5, cols6-9 are black. rows6-9, cols2-5 are black. So it's like two 4x4 green blocks placed on diagonal, with a "open atrium row and corridor column where there was bare ground". The input had black cells? Input had black at many positions: all except the 2x2 block. The black region maybe corresponds to the open row/column separating the two wings. Specifically, input black cells: positions (1,1)-(1,3), (2,1), (3,1). That's a shape: first row all black, first column rows2-3 black. That's like an L shape of black. In output, the open row is row1 (all black) and open column is col1 (all black). So the black L shape is scaled up to a full row and column of size 9? Actually row1 is length 9 black, column1 is length 9 black. So scaling factor 3? Input size 3, output 9 = 3x scaling. The black L shape becomes a full row and column of black across entire output. The green 2x2 block becomes two 4x4 blocks? How? The green region in input is a 2x2 block (positions (2,2)-(3,3)). In output, we have two 4x4 green blocks placed on diagonal, each of size 4 (which is 2*scale?). Scale factor 2? Wait scaling factor from input to output is 3 (size 3 to 9). But green block size 2 becomes 4? That's factor 2. Hmm maybe each green cell expands to a 2x2 block? Let's test: Input green cells: (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's three green cells. Output green cells: there are 4x4 + 4x4 = 32 green cells. That's not simple scaling. Maybe rule: take the green region (a 2x2 with red top-left) and create two wings: on ... [5973 chars truncated]
"A red command post holds the center while green troops mass in one flank. When battle lines expand, two green battalions deploy to opposing strongholds along the axis the troops originally leaned toward. The no-man's-land — the empty file and rank — remains unoccupied."
120b: fail
See: A small battlefield grid with a red command post at center and green troops in one corner flank.
Do: Deploy at scale: two battalions fill opposing strongholds along the diagonal the troops indicated, while the empty rank and file become no-man's-land.
Grid: Input: 3×3 field. Output: 9×9 battlefield. Two 4×4 green battalions on the diagonal, one empty row and column as no-man's-land.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input 3x3: Row0: . . . Row1: . R G Row2: . G G Output 9x9. Let's map. Output appears to have two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal? Let's view output matrix. I'll write coordinates 0-8. Rows0-3 columns0-3: a 4x4 block of G? Actually output rows0-3 columns0-3 are all G? Let's see row0: ". . . . . . . . ." (all .) Wait row0 is all .? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . . ." (all .). Row1: ". G G G G . . . ." So rows1-4 columns1-4 are G? Let's list. Row0: all . Row1: col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 G; col3 G; col4 G; rest . . Row2 same as row1. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: ". . . . . G G G G" Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 same. So we have a 4x4 green block starting at (1,1) to (4,4). Another 4x4 green block starting at (5,5) to (8,8). So diagonal blocks offset by one row/col gap? Actually there is empty row0 and column0, and also empty row5? Wait row5 has empty columns0-4 then block at 5-8. So there is a gap of one row/col between blocks? The first block occupies rows1-4, cols1-4. The second block rows5-8, cols5-8. So there is a single empty row (row0) and column (col0) before first block, and also a single empty row/col between blocks? Actually between block1 and block2 there is row5? No block2 starts at row5, col5, so rows5-8. Row5 is part of block2, not empty. So there is no gap between blocks; they are adjacent diagonally with a one-cell offset? Wait block1 ends at row4 col4. Block2 starts at row5 col5, so there is a one-cell gap (row5 col4? column4 row5?). That's the diagonal cell (4,5) etc. Actually the empty row/col "no-man's-land" maybe the row and column that correspond to the position of the red command post? Let's examine input: red at (1,1) (0-index). Input grid coordinates: row0 col0 '.'; row0 col1 '.'; row0 col2 '.'; row1 col0 '.'; row1 col1 'R'; row1 col2 'G'; row2 col0 '.'; row2 col1 'G'; row2 col2 'G'. So red at (1,1). The output seems to have empty row0 and column0 (i.e., before red). Also empty row? Actually there is also empty column? Let's see column0 all rows are '.' (yes). Row0 all '.' (yes). So the empty rank and file correspond to the row and column of the red? In input red at (1,1) but output empty row0 and col0, not row1 col1. So maybe they shift by -1? Because scaling factor 3? Actually output size 9 = 3*3. So each input cell expands to 3x3 block? But not exactly. Let's think: scaling factor maybe 3? Input 3x3 -> output 9x9 (scale factor 3). The rule: For each cell in input, produce a 3x3 subgrid in output. The red cell becomes empty row/col? Let's test. If we map each input cell to a 3x3 region: positions (i*3 to i*3+2). For input (0,0) '.' => output rows0-2 cols0-2 maybe all '.'? In example, rows0-2 cols0-2 are: row0 col0-2 '.'; row1 col0-2 '.' G G? Actually row1 col0 '.' col1 G col2 G. So not all '.'. So maybe rule: For each green cell, fill a 4x4 block? Not. Let's examine example2. Input2: Row0: G G . Row1: G R . Row2: . . . Output 9x9 given. Let's write outp ... [7580 chars truncated]
"A red spotlight marks center stage while green actors cluster in one wing. When the curtain rises on the grand production, two full ensemble scenes play out on opposite diagonal stages, following the wing the actors first gathered in. The dark crosswalk between stages stays unlit."
120b: fail
See: A small stage with a red spotlight at center and green actors grouped in one wing area.
Do: Open the grand production: two full scenes bloom on the diagonal stages the actors' wing pointed toward. The crosswalk row and column stay dark.
Grid: Input: 3×3 stage. Output: 9×9 theater. Two 4×4 green scene blocks on the diagonal, one dark row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. Two 4x4 green blocks on diagonal, one dark row and column (black '.'?). Let's examine example. Input: Row0: . . . Row1: . R G Row2: . G G Output 9x9 shown. Let's map. Output rows (0-8): 0: . . . . . . . . . 1: . G G G G . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . . . . . G G G G 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G Interpretation: top-left 4x4 block (rows1-4, cols1-4) all G. bottom-right 4x4 block (rows5-8, cols5-8) all G. The rest are '.' except row0 and col0 all '.' and also row0 col? Actually row0 all '.'; col0 all '.'; also there is a cross row/col? The description says crosswalk row and column stay dark. Which row/col? Probably the middle row and column? But here cross is at row0? Wait output shows row0 all '.' and col0 all '.'; also there is a gap between blocks: rows1-4 have cols5-8 '.'; rows5-8 have cols1-4 '.'. Thus pattern: Input 3x3 with red at (1,1) maybe indicates where to place the cross? Input coordinates: using 0-index: (1,1) is R. That's center of input. Output cross row/col maybe correspond to that? In output, the dark row is row0? Not center. Hmm. Let's think: Input size 3, output size 9 = 3*3. So each input cell expands to 3x3 block? But output shows 4x4 blocks, not 3x3. Maybe each input cell expands to 3x3 but then plus 1? Actually 3*3 =9, but blocks are 4x4, leaving 1 row/col of dark between them? So maybe each input cell becomes a 3x3 region, but the red cell becomes a 1-pixel dark row/col? Let's examine mapping. Input grid: [0,0]=. ; [0,1]=. ; [0,2]=. [1,0]=. ; [1,1]=R ; [1,2]=G [2,0]=. ; [2,1]=G ; [2,2]=G Output: we can think of dividing 9x9 into 3x3 macro cells each of size 3? Actually 9/3=3. So each input cell maps to a 3x3 block. Let's label macro cell (i,j) corresponds to rows i*3 to i*3+2, cols j*3 to j*3+2. Now check macro cell (1,2) corresponds to input G at (1,2). Output rows 3-5, cols 6-8 should be something. Let's see output rows 3-5 (0-index). Row3: . G G G G . . . . (col0 '.' col1-4 G col5-8 .). Row4 similar. Row5: . . . . . G G G G. So macro cell (1,2) (rows3-5, cols6-8) includes rows3-5, cols6-8: Row3 col6-8 = . . . ; Row4 col6-8 = . . . ; Row5 col6-8 = G G G. That's not uniform. Thus not simple macro mapping. Alternative: The output seems to have two 4x4 green squares placed at positions offset by 1 from top-left and bottom-right corners. The input had green cells at (1,2), (2,1), (2,2). Those maybe define shape of green blocks? The green block size 4 maybe equals count of green cells? There are 3 green cells. Not 4. Maybe rule: Take the pattern of green cells relative to red, and create two larger blocks on diagonal opposite corners, leaving a dark cross at row/col of red? In output, dark cross is row0 and col0 (first row and column). That corresponds to red being at (1,1) maybe mapping to top-left corner? Not. Let's examine coordinates: In output, the top-left block of G occupi ... [5157 chars truncated]
"A red marker stake stands in the center of a plot, with green sprouts clustered in one bed corner. Come harvest, two lush garden beds overflow along the diagonal the sprouts leaned toward, while the bare paths — where nothing was planted — remain as walkways dividing the larger garden."
120b: fail
See: A small garden plot with a red stake at center and green sprouts in one corner bed.
Do: At harvest, two full beds flourish along the sprouts' diagonal. The bare row and column become dividing walkways in the expanded garden.
Grid: Input: 3×3 plot. Output: 9×9 garden. Two 4×4 green beds on the diagonal, one path row and column.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 9x9. In example, input grid: Row1: . . . Row2: . R G Row3: . G G Output shown as 9x9 with pattern: top-left 4x4 block of G? Let's map. Output rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G G G . . . . 3: . G G G G . . . . 4: . G G G G . . . . 5: . G G G G . . . . 6: . . . . . G G G G 7: . . . . . G G G G 8: . . . . . G G G G 9: . . . . . G G G G Interpretation: There is a 4x4 green block at rows2-5, cols2-5. And another 4x4 green block at rows6-9, cols6-9. The rest are black '.'. So rule: Input has a red cell at (2,2) (using 1-index). Green cells at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3). That's a 2x2 green L shape? Actually positions: (row2,col3) G, (row3,col2) G, (row3,col3) G. So a 2x2 block of G at bottom right of a 2x2 subgrid? The red at (2,2) is top-left of that 2x2? Wait coordinates: Input grid: [1,1] . ; [1,2] . ; [1,3] . [2,1] . ; [2,2] R ; [2,3] G [3,1] . ; [3,2] G ; [3,3] G So red at (2,2). Greens at (2,3), (3,2), (3,3) forming a 2x2 block missing top-left (which is red). So pattern: a red cell adjacent to a 2x2 green block (forming a 2x2 with red as top-left). Output: two 4x4 green blocks placed along diagonal, with a row and column of black separating them (like walkway). The red disappears? In output no red appears. So transformation: Input 3x3 pattern expands to 9x9 where the green region expands to 4x4 blocks placed at positions determined by red? The red maybe indicates direction? In example, red at (2,2) central? Actually central of input? Not exactly center (center would be (2,2) for 3x3). Yes red is at center. So red at center indicates that we will create two green blocks along diagonal: one in top-left? Actually output has first green block at rows2-5, cols2-5 (i.e., offset by 1 from top-left). That's not top-left corner but near top-left. Second block at rows6-9, cols6-9 (bottom-right). So they are placed along diagonal from top-left to bottom-right, with a separating row/col of black (row5? Actually row5 is part of first block, row6 start second block). The black walkway is column5? Wait column5 is part of first block (col2-5). Column6 is start of second block. So walkway is column6? Actually there is no black column between blocks; they are adjacent? Let's see: first block occupies cols2-5, second block cols6-9, so column6 is part of second block, column5 part of first. So there is no black column separating; but there is a black row/col? The description says "bare row and column become dividing walkways". In output, row1 is all black, column1 is all black, also rows6-9 columns1-5 are black? Actually rows6-9 columns1-5 are black (since only green in cols6-9). So there is a black region forming an L shape walkway: top row and left column are black, also bottom-left area is black, top-right area black. So basically the green blocks occupy two quadrants: top-left quadrant (excluding first row/col) and bottom-right quadrant (excluding first row/col). So rule: take the green shape (excluding re ... [6139 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains several distinctly colored rectangular shapes on an orange (O) background. Each shape is an almost-complete rectangle — it is missing exactly one corner cell. That missing corner is filled with an azure (A) cell instead of the shape's own color. The azure cell thus sits at one corner of what would be the shape's full bounding rectangle, indicating a direction.
Do: For each colored shape (ignoring orange background and azure markers): 1. Identify the shape's bounding rectangle by finding the minimal rectangle that contains all cells of that color plus the adjacent azure (A) cell that completes the rectangle's missing corner. 2. Determine which corner of the bounding rectangle the azure cell occupies (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, or bottom-right). 3. Complete the shape into a full rectangle by replacing the azure cell with the shape's color. 4. Shift the entire completed rectangle by exactly 1 cell in the direction indicated by the azure corner: top-left corner means shift up 1 and left 1; top-right means shift up 1 and right 1; bottom-left means shift down 1 and left 1; bottom-right means shift down 1 and right 1. 5. Place the shifted rectangle on a blank orange background. Repeat for all shapes. The original positions are cleared to orange.
Grid: The grid dimensions are the same for input and output. The background color is orange (O). All colored shapes remain fully within grid bounds after shifting. Shapes do not overlap.
"Each shape is a creature stretching toward a scent on the breeze, then lunging one step to catch it."
120b: k=1
See: Against a vast orange desert, colored creatures rest — nearly perfect rectangles, but each one is missing a single corner tooth. In that gap sits a tiny azure firefly, hovering just outside the creature's bite. The firefly marks the direction the creature is yearning toward, like a compass needle the creature can smell but not yet reach.
Do: Each creature swallows the azure firefly, filling in its missing tooth to become a complete rectangle. Now whole, the creature lunges one step diagonally toward where the firefly was — pulled in that direction as if the firefly's glow left a trail. A firefly at the top-left corner pulls the creature up and to the left; one at the bottom-right pulls it down and to the right, and so on. After every creature has lunged, the desert sand (orange) fills in the places they left behind, as if they were never there.
Grid: The desert stays the same size. The sand is always orange. Every creature remains fully within the desert after lunging — none leap off the edge. No two creatures collide.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's parse. We have colors: W maroon, A azure, X grey, O orange desert, B blue, G green, Y yellow, R red. Metaphor: creatures are rectangles missing a corner tooth (i.e., L-shaped? Actually rectangle missing one corner cell). Azure firefly is a single A cell adjacent to missing corner? The firefly marks direction creature wants to go. Creature fills missing corner (i.e., becomes full rectangle) then moves one step diagonally towards firefly direction (i.e., the direction of the missing corner). After moving, the original rectangle cells become orange (sand). So output shows rectangle shifted diagonally by one cell towards the missing corner, and the original location becomes orange. Let's examine example 1. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate creatures. Look at colors B (blue) forms a 3x3 block? Input lines: Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We have two creatures: one blue rectangle missing a corner with azure A at missing corner? Let's see B region: rows2-4 columns5-7 (0-index). That's a 3x3 solid block of B. No missing corner. But there is an A at row1 col5? Actually row1 col5 is A (since row1: W A O O O A B B O O). Wait positions: columns:0 W,1 A,2 O,3 O,4 O,5 A,6 B,7 B,8 O,9 O. So there are two A's: at (1,1) and (1,5). The B block is at rows2-4, cols5-7. The A at (1,5) is directly above the B block, at its top-left corner? The B block missing top-left cell? Actually B block is full 3x3, but there is an A above it, not part of B. Maybe the creature is the B block missing top-left corner (i.e., shape of 3x3 with missing top-left cell) and the A indicates missing corner location. Let's see: If we consider rectangle of size 3x3 that would occupy rows1-3, cols4-6? Not matching. Let's map coordinates: B block coordinates: rows2-4, cols5-7. That's 3 rows x3 cols. The missing corner would be at (row1,col4) maybe? But A at (1,5) not (1,4). Hmm. Maybe the creature is the X grey block? X region rows6-9, cols1-5 (a 4x5 rectangle?) Actually rows6-9, cols1-5 are X (grey). That's a 4x5 block (rows6-9 inclusive =4 rows, cols1-5 =5 columns). But there is an A at row6 col5? Row6: O X X X X A O O O O. So A at (6,5) which is rightmost column of X block? The X block missing a corner at (6,5) maybe? The X block is rectangle missing top-right corner? Let's see shape: rows6-9, cols1-5 includes cells (6,1-4) X, (6,5) is A not X. So the rectangle of X would be rows6-9, cols1-5, but missing cell (6,5) which is top-right corner. So the missing corner is at top-right, and the A is there. So creature (grey) will fill missing corner (turn A to X) then move diagonally towards that corner direction: top-right direction means move up and right by one cell (i.e., row-1, col+1). So after transformation, the X block ... [9547 chars truncated]
"Each organism bears a single azure mutation at one extremity — a genetic compass needle. During mitosis, the cell colony heals the mutation to match its true color, then migrates one body-length toward the site where the mutation appeared, as if drawn by chemotaxis toward a fading signal."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored rectangular colonies on an orange medium, each with one azure-marked corner cell replacing its native pigment.
Do: Cure each colony's azure mutation by restoring its true color, completing the rectangle. Then shift the whole colony one step diagonally toward the corner where the mutation was found. Clear the original footprint to orange.
Grid: Same dimensions. Orange background. All colonies remain within bounds and do not overlap.
"Each colored nebula is a rectangle of stellar gas with one azure protostar glowing at a corner — the gravitational anchor. When the protostar ignites fully and matches the nebula's spectrum, the whole cloud is pulled one parsec diagonally toward the protostar's position, collapsing into its gravity well."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular nebulae on an orange void, each with an azure protostar at one corner.
Do: Ignite the protostar to the nebula's color, completing the rectangle. Shift the nebula one cell diagonally toward the protostar's corner. Clear the original space to orange.
Grid: Same cosmic grid. Orange background. No nebulae overlap.
"Each colored fleet sails in a rectangular convoy with one azure buoy anchored at a corner — marking the heading. The crew paints the buoy to match their hull colors, then the fleet tacks one league diagonally toward the buoy, following the channel it marked."
120b: k=2
See: Rectangular fleets on an orange sea, each with an azure buoy at one corner.
Do: Paint the buoy the fleet's color, completing the rectangle. Sail the fleet one cell diagonally toward the buoy's corner. The wake fades to orange.
Grid: Same ocean dimensions. Orange water background.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Rectangular fleets on an orange sea, each with an azure buoy at one corner. Paint the buoy the fleet's color, completing the rectangle. Sail the fleet one cell diagonally toward the buoy's corner. The wake fades to orange." Interpretation: In input, there are rectangles (filled) of a color (fleet) with an azure (A) cell at one corner of rectangle (buoy). The rectangle likely missing that corner cell (maybe not filled). The rule: fill that corner with the fleet's color (paint buoy). Then shift the rectangle one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., move the whole rectangle one step towards the corner). The cells vacated become orange (background). Also the original buoy cell (A) maybe becomes orange? Actually "paint the buoy the fleet's color, completing the rectangle." So A becomes that color. Then "Sail the fleet one cell diagonally toward the buoy's corner. The wake fades to orange." So after painting, the rectangle (including the newly colored corner) moves one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., up-left if corner is top-left? Actually direction depends on which corner the buoy is at). The rectangle moves towards the buoy's corner, meaning the rectangle slides so that the buoy corner becomes the new leading corner? Wait: If buoy is at one corner of rectangle, after painting, the rectangle is complete. Then we move the rectangle one cell diagonally toward that corner, meaning the rectangle shifts such that the buoy corner becomes the new position? Let's examine example. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Let's map colors: O orange background. There is a blue rectangle B? Let's locate. Input rows: Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We have two fleets: Blue rectangle B (size 3x3?) Actually B region rows1-4 columns5-7? Let's index columns 0-9. Row1: col5 A (azure), col6 B, col7 B Row2: col5 B,6 B,7 B Row3: same Row4: same So rectangle of B is 4 rows (1-4) and 3 columns (5-7) but missing top-left corner? The azure A at (1,5) is top-left corner of rectangle. So rectangle missing that cell (should be B). So we paint A to B. Similarly there is a grey rectangle X with azure A at (6,5) maybe? Let's see rows6-9 columns1-5? Actually row6: O X X X X A O O O O (col1 X,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 A). Row7: O X X X X X ... (col1-5 X). Row8 same, row9 same. So rectangle of X is 4 rows (6-9) and 5 columns (1-5) missing top-right corner? Wait azure at (6,5) which is rightmost column of rectangle? The rectangle appears to be columns1-5 rows6-9, but top row (row6) has X at cols1-4, A at col5. So missing top-right corner (col5). So azure at top-right corner. Thus rule: For each rectangle of a color (fleet) with an azure A at one corner (missing piece), we fill that corner with the fleet's color, completin ... [9743 chars truncated]
"Each colored circuit block has one azure LED at a corner — a diagnostic indicator showing signal direction. When the LED is soldered over with the circuit's own copper, the completed module shifts one trace-width diagonally toward where the LED signaled, snapping to its routed position on the orange PCB."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular circuit modules on an orange PCB, each with an azure diagnostic LED at one corner.
Do: Solder the LED into the module's color, completing the rectangle. Route the module one cell diagonally toward the LED's corner. Clear the old footprint to orange.
Grid: Same board dimensions. Orange substrate.
"Each colored titan sleeps as a rectangular monolith with one azure rune glowing at a corner — the awakening glyph. When the rune absorbs the titan's essence and matches its stone, the monolith lurches one stride diagonally toward the rune's corner, answering the ancient summons."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular monoliths on an orange plane, each with an azure rune at one corner.
Do: Fill the rune with the monolith's color, completing the rectangle. Shift the monolith one cell diagonally toward the rune's corner. The old ground returns to orange.
Grid: Same plane dimensions. Orange ground.
"Each colored troupe holds a rectangular formation with one azure dancer at a corner — the lead who sets the direction of the next chassé. The lead changes into the troupe's color, and the whole formation glides one step diagonally toward the lead's corner, executing a synchronized shift."
120b: fail
See: Rectangular dance formations on an orange floor, each with an azure lead dancer at one corner.
Do: Recolor the lead to match the troupe, completing the rectangle. Glide the formation one cell diagonally toward the lead's corner. Clear the old positions to orange.
Grid: Same floor dimensions. Orange surface.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Actually example 1 input 10x10. Output also 10x10. Let's analyze. We have colors: W maroon, A azure, B blue, O orange, X grey. Interpretation: "Rectangular dance formations on an orange floor, each with an azure lead dancer at one corner. Recolor the lead to match the troupe, completing the rectangle. Glide the formation one cell diagonally toward the lead's corner. Clear the old positions to orange." So there are rectangles composed of a color (troupe) maybe B blue, X grey? In example, there are two rectangles: one of B (blue) and one of X (grey). Each rectangle has an azure A at one corner (lead). Need to recolor the lead to match the rectangle's color, completing rectangle (i.e., fill missing corner). Then move the whole rectangle one cell diagonally toward the lead's corner (i.e., shift up-left? Actually "toward the lead's corner" meaning the corner where the lead was originally? The lead is at one corner of rectangle; after recoloring, we shift rectangle diagonally towards that corner, meaning the rectangle moves such that the lead's corner becomes the new top-left? Let's examine. Input example: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. I'll write grid. Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We see a blue rectangle of B's: rows1-4, cols5-7? Let's see: Row1 col5 is A (azure) at (1,5). Row1 also has B B at cols6-7. Row2-4 have B B B at cols5-7? Actually row2: B at cols5-7 (since O O O O O B B B O O). So rectangle of B size 4 rows (1-4) and 3 columns (5-7). The top-left corner of rectangle would be (1,5) which currently is A (azure). So azure lead at top-left corner. Need to recolor that to B, completing rectangle (makes all B). Indeed output shows B at (1,5) etc. Now the grey rectangle: X's rows6-9, cols1-5? Let's see: Row6: O X X X X A O O O O (positions 1-4 X, col5 A). Row7: O X X X X X O O O O (cols1-5 X). Row8 same, Row9 same. So rectangle of X size 4 rows (6-9) and 5 columns (1-5). The azure A is at (6,5) which is top-right corner? Actually rectangle columns 1-5, rows6-9. The corner at (6,5) is top-right corner. So azure lead at top-right corner. Need to recolor to X. Now after recoloring, we need to "glide the formation one cell diagonally toward the lead's corner." For blue rectangle, lead corner is top-left. So move rectangle one cell up-left (i.e., row-1, col-1). But grid boundaries? In output, where are B's? Output rows0-3? Let's see output grid: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O Row1: O W W O B B B O O O Row2: O W W O B B B O O O Row3: O O O O B B B O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O X X X X X O O O Row6: O O X X X X X O O O Row7: O O X X X X X O O O Row8: O O X X X X X O O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O Blue rectangle now rows0-3, cols4-6? Let's check: Ro ... [10587 chars truncated]
"Each colored mineral vein forms a rectangle in the orange sandstone, but one corner crystal is azure — a stress point in the lattice. When the crystal recrystallizes to match the vein, tectonic pressure nudges the entire deposit one layer diagonally toward the stress point, settling into a new stratum."
120b: fail
See: Rectangular mineral veins in orange sandstone, each with an azure stress crystal at one corner.
Do: Recrystallize the azure crystal to the vein's color, completing the rectangle. Shift the vein one cell diagonally toward the crystal's corner. Fill the vacated space with orange sandstone.
Grid: Same rock dimensions. Orange sandstone background.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's decode. Colors: O=orange background. A=azure (crystal). B=blue (vein color). W=maroon? Actually W is maroon per key. In description: rectangular mineral veins in orange sandstone, each with an azure stress crystal at one corner. So veins are rectangles of some color (blue in example) placed on orange background. At one corner of rectangle there is an azure crystal (A). The rule: Recrystallize azure crystal to vein's color, completing rectangle. Shift the vein one cell diagonally toward the crystal's corner. Fill vacated space with orange sandstone. Interpretation: For each rectangle (filled with a color, e.g., B) that has an A at one corner (adjacent? maybe at a corner outside rectangle?), we change the A cell to the rectangle's color (so rectangle becomes larger by one cell at that corner). Then shift the whole rectangle one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., move rectangle such that its previous location moves away? Wait "Shift the vein one cell diagonally toward the crystal's corner." The vein is rectangle; we shift it one cell diagonally towards the corner where the crystal was. That means the rectangle moves one step in direction of that corner, i.e., the rectangle's position moves closer to the crystal's original location. Since we also recolor the crystal cell to rectangle color, the rectangle after shift will occupy the original rectangle cells shifted, plus the crystal cell becomes part of rectangle? Let's examine example. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate B rectangle. Input lines: Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We have two rectangles? One blue rectangle B: appears rows1-4 columns5-7? Let's index columns 0-9. Row1: col5? Actually row1: "W A O O O A B B O O". Let's map: col0 W,1 A,2 O,3 O,4 O,5 A,6 B,7 B,8 O,9 O. So B at (1,6) and (1,7). Row2: O O O O O B B B O O => B at cols5,6,7. Row3 same, Row4 same. So rectangle of B is rows1-4, cols5-7? But row1 only has B at 6,7 not 5. So missing one cell at (1,5) which is A (azure). So rectangle is 4 rows high (rows1-4) and 3 columns wide (5-7). The top-left corner (row1,col5) is A instead of B. So azure crystal at top-left corner of rectangle. Similarly there is a grey X rectangle rows6-9 cols1-5? Actually rows6-9 have X's forming rectangle 4x5 (rows6-9, cols1-5). At row6 col5? Row6: "O X X X X A O O O O": X at cols1-4, col5 is A (azure) at rightmost top corner? Let's see rectangle of X is rows6-9, cols1-5. At row6 col5 is A, which is top-right corner of rectangle (since rectangle extends downwards). So azure at top-right corner. Now output grid: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O Row1: O W W O B B B O O O Row2: O W W O B B B O O O Row3: O O O O B B B O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O X X X X X O O O Row6: O O X X X ... [9168 chars truncated]
"Each block of dough has a pinch of azure saffron pressed into one corner — the baker's thumbprint showing which way the loaf should slide on the oiled countertop. Knead the saffron into the dough so it vanishes, then give the loaf a gentle nudge — it glides one space in the direction the thumbprint pointed."
120b: k=2
See: Colored dough blocks on an orange countertop, each with an azure saffron mark at one corner.
Do: Absorb the saffron into the dough, completing the rectangle in its natural color. Slide the finished loaf one unit diagonally toward the corner that held the saffron. Wipe the old position clean.
Grid: Same-sized countertop. Orange surface restored where dough was.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with colored blocks (dough) and azure mark (A) at one corner of each block? The description: colored dough blocks on orange countertop, each with an azure saffron mark at one corner. Absorb the saffron into the dough, completing the rectangle in its natural color. Slide the finished loaf one unit diagonally toward the corner that held the saffron. Wipe the old position clean. Orange surface restored where dough was. Interpretation: In input, there are rectangular blocks of a color (e.g., B blue, R red, G green, Y yellow, etc.) that are missing one corner cell which is instead A (azure). The A marks the corner. The block is otherwise filled with its natural color? Let's check Example1. Input example1 grid 10x10. Let's locate B block. Input rows: Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We see a blue block B of size 3x3? Actually rows2-4 columns5-7 are B (3x3). At row1 column? there is A at column5? Let's index columns 0-9. Row1: col0 W,1 A,2 O,3 O,4 O,5 A,6 B,7 B,8 O,9 O. So there are two As: at (1,1) and (1,5). The B block top-left corner would be at (2,5). The A at (1,5) is directly above the top-left corner of B block (north). That's a corner? Actually the missing corner of the block would be at (1,5) if the block were 4x4? Let's see shape: B block currently 3x3. If we add a row above and column left? Not. Maybe the block is 4x4 with missing top-left corner replaced by A. Let's examine region rows1-4, cols5-8? Row1 col5 A, col6 B, col7 B, col8 O. Row2 col5 B,6 B,7 B,8 O. Row3 same. Row4 same. So we have a 4x4 area where top-left cell is A, rest are B except top-right maybe O. Actually top row: A B B O. So missing top-right corner? Not. But description: "each with an azure saffron mark at one corner." So the A is at a corner of the rectangle (block). The rectangle's natural color is the block's color (B). So we need to fill the missing corner with that color, making a full rectangle. Then slide the rectangle one unit diagonally toward the corner that held the saffron (i.e., move rectangle towards that corner). Then wipe old position (set to orange O). So output should have rectangle shifted diagonally (down-right? up-left?) depending on corner. In example1 output: Let's see B rectangle location. Output rows: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O Row1: O W W O B B B O O O Row2: O W W O B B B O O O Row3: O O O O B B B O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O X X X X X O O O Row6: O O X X X X X O O O Row7: O O X X X X X O O O Row8: O O X X X X X O O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O Now B rectangle appears rows0-3, cols4-6 (size 4x3? Actually rows0-3 inclusive =4 rows, cols4-6 =3 columns). That's 4x3 rectangle. In input B block was 3x3 at rows2-4, cols5-7. So rectangle moved up-l ... [9993 chars truncated]
"Each chord cluster on the orange staff has one azure grace note tucked into a corner — a fleeting ornament that tells the performer which way the phrase resolves. Play the grace note as the chord's own tone, then let the whole chord drift one beat in the direction the grace note beckoned."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular chord blocks on an orange score, each missing one corner note replaced by an azure grace note.
Do: Resolve each grace note into the chord's own color, completing the rectangle. Shift the entire chord one position diagonally toward the grace note's corner. Erase the original placement.
Grid: Same dimensions. Orange background throughout.
"Each team's formation on the orange pitch has one player wearing an azure jersey — the designated pivot, always stationed at a corner of the squad's rectangular shape. At the whistle, the pivot changes into the team's colors and the whole formation executes a diagonal set-piece one step toward where the pivot stood."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored rectangular team formations on an orange field, each with one azure-jerseyed pivot at a corner.
Do: Recolor the pivot to match the team, completing the formation. Move the entire formation one cell diagonally in the direction of the pivot's corner. Clear the original ground.
Grid: Same field size. Orange turf restored.
"Each colored cloud mass on an orange sky has an azure lightning point flickering at one corner — static charge building at the leading edge. When the charge equalizes, the lightning pixel absorbs the cloud's hue and the entire storm front drifts one square diagonally toward where the spark discharged."
120b: k=2
See: Rectangular cloud masses on an orange sky, each with an azure spark at one corner.
Do: Neutralize the spark by filling it with the cloud's color. Shift the completed cloud one cell diagonally toward the spark's corner. Clear the old position to sky-orange.
Grid: Same sky dimensions. Orange background. No overlap.
We need to understand the puzzle. The metaphor: rectangular cloud masses on orange sky, each with an azure spark at one corner. Need to neutralize spark by filling it with cloud's color. Shift the completed cloud one cell diagonally toward the spark's corner. Clear old position to sky-orange. Interpretation: In input, there are rectangular blocks of a color (cloud) with an azure (A) cell at one corner of the rectangle. The azure spark is at a corner of the rectangle. The rule: replace the azure cell with the cloud's color (i.e., fill the rectangle fully with its color). Then shift the entire rectangle (including the newly filled cell) one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., towards where the azure was). Then set the cells that were previously occupied by the rectangle (original position) to orange (background). No overlap. Let's verify with examples. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Colors: W (maroon) appears as a 2x2 block at top-left? Let's map. Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We have two cloud masses: one of color W (maroon) with azure A at its corner. The W block appears as 2x2 at top-left (rows0-1, cols0-1). There's also an A at (1,1) which is bottom-right corner of that 2x2? Actually the W block occupies (0,0),(0,1),(1,0). That's only three cells? Wait W at (0,0),(0,1),(1,0). That's L shape? Let's examine: Row0 col0 W, col1 W. Row1 col0 W. So shape is 2x2 missing bottom-right cell (1,1) which is A. So azure at bottom-right corner of rectangle (size 2x2). So rectangle of cloud color W is missing that corner, azure there. Similarly, there is a B (blue) rectangle: rows1-4, cols5-7? Let's see: Row1 col5 A (azure) also? Actually row1 col5 is A (azure) at (1,5). Row1 col6 B, col7 B. Row2 col5 B, col6 B, col7 B. Row3 same, Row4 same. So rectangle of B is 4 rows (1-4) and 3 columns (5-7). The azure A is at top-left corner of that rectangle? Let's see rectangle would be rows1-4, cols5-7. The top-left cell (1,5) is A, others B. So azure at top-left corner. Also there is X (grey) rectangle rows6-9, cols1-5? Actually rows6-9, cols1-5 are X, with an A at (6,5) maybe? Row6: O X X X X A O O O O (col5 is A). So rectangle of X is rows6-9, cols1-5 (4x5). Azure at top-right corner? Let's see rectangle would be rows6-9, cols1-5. Top-right corner is (6,5) which is A. Yes. Thus rule: For each rectangle of a color (cloud) that is missing one corner cell which is azure A, we fill that corner with the cloud color, making rectangle solid. Then shift the whole rectangle one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., towards the azure's original location). That means move rectangle one step in direction of that corner (i.e., up-left? down-right? depends). For first W rectangle, azure at bottom-right corner, so shift rectangle one cell ... [9275 chars truncated]
"Each colored building footprint has one azure cornerstone marking where the foundation should be laid. The mason fills the cornerstone with matching brick, completing the blueprint, then shifts the entire structure one lot diagonally toward the cornerstone's position — as if the building settled into the ground the cornerstone consecrated."
120b: k=1
See: Rectangular building footprints on orange ground, each with an azure cornerstone at one corner.
Do: Replace the cornerstone with the building's color to complete the rectangle. Shift the whole building one cell diagonally toward the cornerstone's corner. Return vacated ground to orange.
Grid: Same plot dimensions. Orange ground. Buildings stay in bounds.
We need to infer rule. From description: rectangular building footprints on orange ground, each with an azure cornerstone at one corner. Replace cornerstone with building's color to complete rectangle. Shift whole building one cell diagonally toward the cornerstone's corner. Return vacated ground to orange. Interpretation: Input has rectangles of some color (building) with an azure (A) at one corner of rectangle (maybe missing one cell of building color). The azure is the cornerstone. The rectangle is otherwise filled with building color? In example, we need to see. Let's parse Example 1 input grid (10x10). Represent. Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O We see two buildings: one blue rectangle B of size 3x3? Actually B region rows1-4 columns5-7? Let's index columns 0-9. Row1: col5 A (azure), col6 B, col7 B Row2: col5 B,6 B,7 B Row3: same Row4: same So rectangle of B 3x3? Actually positions (row1-4, col5-7) would be 4 rows x3 cols. But azure at (1,5) top-left corner? The rectangle missing top-left cell replaced by A. So building color B, azure at top-left corner. So rule: replace azure with building color (B) to complete rectangle, then shift whole building one cell diagonally toward the azure's corner (i.e., top-left direction). Since azure was at top-left, shift up-left? But can't go out of bounds; maybe shift down-right? Wait "toward the cornerstone's corner" meaning shift towards that corner? The cornerstone is at one corner of rectangle; we replace it, then shift rectangle one cell diagonally toward that corner (i.e., move rectangle so that the corner moves into the azure's original position? Actually after replacement, the rectangle is complete; then shift whole building one cell diagonally toward the cornerstone's corner, meaning move rectangle such that the corner that had azure moves outward? Let's examine output. Output grid rows: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O Row1: O W W O B B B O O O Row2: O W W O B B B O O O Row3: O O O O B B B O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O X X X X X O O O Row6: O O X X X X X O O O Row7: O O X X X X X O O O Row8: O O X X X X X O O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O Now blue rectangle appears rows0-3, cols4-6? Let's map: Row0 col4 B,5 B,6 B. Row1 same, Row2 same, Row3 same. That's 4 rows x3 cols, same size as before. Its top-left corner now at (0,4). Original azure at (1,5). The shift appears up-left by (-1,-1) relative to original rectangle position? Original rectangle top-left (including azure) at (1,5). After transformation, rectangle top-left at (0,4) which is up-left one. So shift diagonally toward the azure's corner (which is top-left) meaning move rectangle towards that corner (i.e., up-left). So we shift rectangle one cell up and left. Also the azure cell becomes B (replaced). The ... [9816 chars truncated]
"Each regiment's rectangular formation has one azure standard-bearer at a corner, signaling the direction of advance. On the command, the standard-bearer falls in line with the regiment's colors, and the entire unit advances one pace diagonally toward the corner where the standard flew."
120b: k=1
See: Colored rectangular regiments on an orange battlefield, each with an azure standard at one corner.
Do: Absorb the standard into the regiment's color, completing the block. March the whole regiment one cell diagonally toward the standard's corner. The vacated ground returns to orange.
Grid: Same battlefield size. Orange terrain. No regiment overlaps.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: "Colored rectangular regiments on an orange battlefield, each with an azure standard at one corner. Absorb the standard into the regiment's color, completing the block. March the whole regiment one cell diagonally toward the standard's corner. The vacated ground returns to orange." Interpretation: In input, there are rectangular blocks of a color (regiment) that are missing one corner cell which is azure (A). The azure standard is at one corner of the rectangle. The rectangle is otherwise filled with that color? Possibly missing that corner cell (maybe also other cells?). The rule: fill that missing corner with the regiment's color (absorb standard), then shift the entire rectangle one cell diagonally towards that corner (i.e., move the rectangle so that its previous corner becomes filled with the color, and the rectangle moves one step towards that corner). The cell vacated (the opposite corner?) becomes orange. Let's examine example 1. Input grid 10x10. Let's map. I'll write coordinates row, col 0-index. Input rows: 0: W W O O O O O O O O 1: W A O O O A B B O O 2: O O O O O B B B O O 3: O O O O O B B B O O 4: O O O O O B B B O O 5: O O O O O O O O O O 6: O X X X X A O O O O 7: O X X X X X O O O O 8: O X X X X X O O O O 9: O X X X X X O O O O We see two regiments: one of B (blue) rectangle maybe 3x3? Let's locate B region: rows1-4, cols5-7? Actually row1 col5 is A (azure). Row1 col6 B, col7 B. Row2 col5 B,6 B,7 B. Row3 same, row4 same. So rectangle of B size 4 rows (1-4) and 3 columns (5-7). The top-left corner of that rectangle would be (row1,col5) which is A (azure). So azure at top-left corner. The rest of rectangle filled with B except that corner is A. So rule: replace A with B (absorb) and shift rectangle one cell diagonally toward that corner (i.e., up-left). That would move rectangle up-left by one cell, so new B block occupies rows0-3, cols4-6? Let's see output. Output rows: 0: O O O O B B B O O O 1: O W W O B B B O O O 2: O W W O B B B O O O 3: O O O O B B B O O O 4: O O O O O O O O O O 5: O O X X X X X O O O 6: O O X X X X X O O O 7: O O X X X X X O O O 8: O O X X X X X O O O 9: O O O O O O O O O O Now B block appears rows0-3, cols4-6 (4 rows, 3 cols). Indeed shifted up-left by 1. The original A at (1,5) is gone, replaced by B. The vacated cells (the bottom-right corner of original rectangle?) become orange. In output, original rectangle's bottom row (row4) col5-7 are now O (orange). Indeed row4 col4-6 are O. So that matches. Now second regiment: X (grey) rectangle rows6-9, cols1-5? Let's see input: rows6-9, cols1-5 are X, but there is an A at (6,5) (row6 col5) azure. Actually row6: O X X X X A O O O O (col1-4 X, col5 A). Row7: O X X X X X ... (col1-5 X). Row8 same, row9 same. So rectangle of X size 4 rows (6-9) and 5 columns (1-5). Azure at top-right corner? Wait top row of rectangle is row6, columns1-5. The azure is at column5 (rightmost) of top row, so top-right corner. So ... [7860 chars truncated]
"Each ensemble of actors in matching costumes holds a rectangular stage block, but one performer at a corner wears azure — the understudy learning their cue. When the understudy dons the company's costume, the entire troupe takes one step diagonally toward the corner where the understudy stood, hitting their final stage mark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular actor groups on an orange stage, each with one azure-costumed understudy at a corner.
Do: Dress the understudy in the company color, completing the rectangle. Move the troupe one cell diagonally toward the understudy's corner. Clear the previous positions to bare stage.
Grid: Same stage dimensions. Orange floor. No overlapping troupes.
"Each flower bed is a neat colored rectangle with one azure seedling at a corner — not yet bloomed. When the seedling blossoms into the bed's color, the entire garden patch creeps one space diagonally toward the seedling, as if the roots pulled the bed toward fresh soil."
120b: k=1
See: Rectangular flower beds on orange earth, each with an azure seedling at one corner.
Do: Bloom the seedling into the bed's color, completing the rectangle. Shift the bed one cell diagonally toward the seedling's corner. Restore old ground to orange.
Grid: Same garden dimensions. Orange soil background.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10. Output also 10x10. Let's map. Input example1 grid: I'll label coordinates (row, col). Let's write input matrix. Row0: W W O O O O O O O O Row1: W A O O O A B B O O Row2: O O O O O B B B O O Row3: O O O O O B B B O O Row4: O O O O O B B B O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O X X X X A O O O O Row7: O X X X X X O O O O Row8: O X X X X X O O O O Row9: O X X X X X O O O O Output: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O Row1: O W W O B B B O O O Row2: O W W O B B B O O O Row3: O O O O B B B O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O X X X X X O O O Row6: O O X X X X X O O O Row7: O O X X X X X O O O Row8: O O X X X X X O O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O Interpretation: There are two rectangular "beds": one of color B (blue) rectangle originally at rows1-4, cols5-7? Let's see input: B's appear in rows1-4, cols5-6-7? Actually row1: ... A B B ... positions: col5? Let's index 0-9. Row1: W A O O O A B B O O. So B at col6 and 7? Wait col0 W,1 A,2 O,3 O,4 O,5 A,6 B,7 B,8 O,9 O. Row2: O O O O O B B B O O => B at col5,6,7. Row3 same, Row4 same. So rectangle of B 4 rows (1-4) and 3 columns (5-7) but top row (row1) only has B at col6,7 (missing col5) because that cell had A (azure) seedling at corner? Actually seedling azure A at (row1,col5) which is top-left corner of rectangle? The rectangle's top-left corner would be (row1,col5). Indeed there is A there. So rule: replace A with B (bloom), fill rectangle fully with B. Then shift rectangle one cell diagonally toward the seedling's corner (i.e., up-left?) Wait shift toward seedling's corner means move rectangle towards that corner? The seedling is at corner of rectangle; after blooming, we shift rectangle one cell diagonally toward that corner. Since seedling is at top-left corner, shift rectangle up-left by one cell. But grid boundaries? In output, B rectangle appears at rows0-3, cols4-6? Let's see output rows0-3: Row0: O O O O B B B O O O => B at cols4,5,6. Row1: O W W O B B B O O O => B at cols4,5,6. Row2 same. Row3: O O O O B B B O O O => B at cols4,5,6. So rectangle moved up-left by one (row-1, col-1). Indeed original top-left (row1,col5) becomes (row0,col4). Good. Also the original rectangle area after moving leaves behind original cells: they become orange O, except the original A becomes W? Wait original A at (1,5) becomes W in output? Actually output row1 col5 is W? Row1: O W W O B B B O O O. At col1? Let's map: row1 output: col0 O,1 W,2 W,3 O,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 O,8 O,9 O. So original A at (1,5) now is B (since rectangle moved). Wait original A at (1,5) is now B? Actually after shift, rectangle occupies (0-3,4-6). So (1,5) is within rectangle, becomes B. So original A replaced by B (bloom). The original W's at (0,0) and (0,1) become O? In output row0 col0 O, col1 O (they were W). So original W (maroon) become O (orange). Also original W at (1,0) becomes O? Row1 col0 O. So W's turned to O. The original A at (1,5) turned to B (bloom). The other A at (1,5?) ... [9870 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains exactly two objects on a black background: (1) a green 2×2 block, and (2) a red shape made of connected red cells. The red shape is adjacent to the green block, positioned on one side (or in one quadrant) relative to the green center. The green block acts as a central pivot point.
Do: Find the center of the green 2×2 block (the point where its four cells meet). Reflect the entire red shape to produce four-fold symmetry around this center point: (1) mirror the red shape horizontally across the vertical axis through the green center, (2) mirror the red shape vertically across the horizontal axis through the green center, and (3) mirror it diagonally (equivalently, apply both horizontal and vertical reflections). For each original red cell at position (r, c), compute the three reflected positions using the green center (cr, cc): horizontally reflected to (r, 2·cc − c − 1), vertically reflected to (2·cr − r − 1, c), and doubly reflected to (2·cr − r − 1, 2·cc − c − 1). Place red cells at all reflected positions. Keep the green block unchanged. If a reflected copy already exists (the input already has symmetry in some direction), the output is unchanged in that region.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly (variable size). The background is black (.). The green 2×2 block remains in place. The output grid contains the original red shape plus up to three reflected copies, forming four-fold (bilateral + rotational) symmetry around the green block's center.
"The green jewel is a hall of mirrors, and the red dancer sees her reflections on every wall."
120b: k=2
See: A red dancer strikes a pose near a small green jewel sitting on a dark stage. The jewel has four perfectly polished faces — it is a tiny mirror box at the heart of the world.
Do: The green jewel awakens and casts the dancer's image outward in every direction it can reflect — left and right, up and down, and corner to corner. Wherever the dancer stands, her reflections appear on the opposite sides of the jewel, as if she is performing inside a kaleidoscope. The jewel itself never moves — it only watches and reflects. If a reflection would land where the dancer (or another reflection) already stands, nothing changes — mirrors don't argue over who arrived first.
Grid: The dark stage stays the same size. The green jewel remains fixed at its position, glowing quietly. The red dancer now appears to be surrounded by her own reflections, forming a symmetrical constellation that honors the jewel as its center. Every quadrant around the jewel tells the same story, just viewed from a different mirror.
We need to infer rule: There's a green jewel (G) of size 2x2 (as in examples). The red dancer (R) pattern is reflected across the jewel in all 8 directions (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) producing symmetric pattern around the jewel. The jewel stays same. The reflections are placed such that for each red cell, its mirror across the center of the jewel (the 2x2 block) is placed. The jewel is at some coordinates. In example1, input grid 10x10. Jewel at rows 3-4? Let's index 0-based. Input example1 rows: row0 ". R R . . . . . . ." etc. Jewel appears rows 3 and 4 (0-index) columns 4 and5? Actually row3: ". . . . G G . . . ." So columns 4,5 are G. Row4 same. So jewel at (3,4)-(4,5). Output shows reflections of R pattern around jewel: original R cluster near top left of jewel? Let's see input R positions: rows0-2 columns1-3 etc. Output adds R's mirrored to bottom right etc. Indeed they reflect across both axes.
In example2, larger grid 20x30? Jewel at rows7-8 columns9-10 (0-index). Input R pattern is a plus shape? Actually there is a vertical line of R at columns5 rows3-6, plus a horizontal line at row6 columns5-8, making a T shape? Output shows reflections across jewel both horizontally and vertically, creating pattern repeated in four quadrants.
Thus rule: For each red cell, compute its offset relative to the center of the jewel (the center point between the four G cells). Then place a red cell at the symmetric position across the jewel: i.e., reflect the offset sign (dx, dy) to opposite signs, generating up to 4 copies? Actually they reflect in all directions: original stays, plus reflections across vertical axis (mirror left-right), across horizontal axis (up-down), and across both (diagonal). So total up to 4 copies (including original) making symmetric about the jewel's center.
Implementation: For each red cell at (r,c), compute its vector to the jewel center. Jewel center is between the four cells: coordinates (r0+0.5, c0+0.5) where top-left G at (r0,c0). Then reflected positions are (center - (dx,dy))? Actually original offset = (r - center_y, c - center_x). Mirror across vertical axis: (r - center_y, -(c - center_x)). Mirror across horizontal: (-(r - center_y), c - center_x). Mirror across both: (-(r - center_y), -(c - center_x)). Then round to integer positions? Since center is half-integer, offsets are half-integer, resulting positions integer. Works.
Now apply to test input.
Test grid size 18 rows x14 columns? Actually lines show 18 rows, each 14 columns. Jewel: rows6-7 columns6-7 are G (0-index). Let's index.
Rows (0-based):
0: all .
1: all .
2: ". . R R R R . . . . . . . ."
3: ". . . R . . . . . . . . . ."
4: ". . . . R . . . . . . . . ."
5: ". . . . R R . . . . . . . ."
6: ". . . . . . G G . . . . . ."
7: same as row6
8-17 all .
Now list R coordinates.
Row2: columns2,3,4,5 are R (since ". . R R R R . . ...") So (2,2),(2,3),(2,4),(2,5)
Row3: column3 is R (". . . R ...") => (3,3)
Row4: column4 is R => (4,4)
Row5: columns4,5
... [6298 chars truncated]
"A green nucleus pulses at the heart of the cell, and a red organelle undergoes mitotic division — splitting into identical copies that arrange themselves in perfect bilateral symmetry across both axes of the cell membrane."
120b: k=1
See: A green nucleus and a red organelle floating in a dark cellular void.
Do: The organelle divides and its daughter copies migrate to fill every quadrant around the nucleus, each a mirror-image of the original.
Grid: The dark cytoplasm, green nucleus, and red organelle copies fill the same cellular boundary as before.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Actually example 1 input shows 10 rows, each 10 columns. Output also 10x10. In input: there is a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5, cols 5-6 (0-index?). Red shape: appears like a diagonal? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input rows: 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6-9 all dots. Red shape looks like a small pattern maybe like a "L" shape? Actually coordinates: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) That's like a shape of 6 cells. Output shows same green block unchanged at same location rows3-4 cols4-5 (since zero-index). Also red copies appear in other quadrants: top right, bottom left, bottom right? Let's see output rows: Row0: . R R . . . . R R . Row1: . R . R . . R . R . Row2: . . R R . . R R . . Row3: . . . . G G . . . . Row4: . . . . G G . . . . Row5: . . R R . . R R . . Row6: . R . R . . R . R . Row7: . R R . . . . R R . Rows8-9 all dots. So original red shape at top-left (rows0-2, cols1-3). In output, same shape remains there. Additional copies appear at top-right (rows0-2, cols6-8), bottom-left (rows5-7, cols1-3), bottom-right (rows5-7, cols6-8). So four quadrants around the green nucleus (center). The green nucleus is 2x2 at rows3-4, cols4-5. The grid is 10x10, nucleus occupies central region. The red shape is placed in each quadrant, mirrored? Let's see orientation: top-left original orientation. Top-right copy appears mirrored horizontally? Compare original shape coordinates relative to quadrant. Original shape pattern: rows0-2, cols1-3. In top-right copy rows0-2, cols6-8. Let's map pattern: At top-right, row0 col6-7 are R R (same as original row0 col1-2). Row0 col8 is .? Actually output row0: ". R R . . . . R R ." So at cols6,7 are R,R; col8 is .? Wait there is a dot at col8? Actually pattern shows at col8 is '.'? The row0 string: positions: 0 '.';1 'R';2 'R';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 'R';8 'R';9 '.' . Wait there is a '.' at col6? Let's recount: row0 output: ". R R . . . . R R ." That's 10 entries: index0 '.';1 'R';2 'R';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 'R';8 'R';9 '.'. So the copy occupies cols7-8 not 6-7. Actually original occupies cols1-2 (two Rs) and col? original row0 had R at col1 and col2. So copy at col7 and 8. That's mirrored horizontally across center column? The center vertical line is between cols4 and5? Actually nucleus occupies cols4-5. So left side columns 0-3, right side columns 6-9. Mirror across vertical axis between 4 and5. Original at cols1-2 (distance 3-4 from center). Mirror would be cols? distance from center: col1 distance to center line? Let's compute center line between 4 and5. Mirror of col1 (distance 3 left of line) would be col? line index 4.5? Mirror would be col? 4.5 + 3 = 7.5 => col7 or 8? Since integer, maybe col8? Indeed copy at col7-8. So seems mirrored. Also shape orientation maybe also mirrored vertically for bottom quadrants ... [8712 chars truncated]
"The green binary star system sits at the gravitational center. A red nebula glows in one quadrant of the sky. Spacetime around the twin stars acts as a gravitational lens — bending the nebula's light into three additional images, one in each remaining quadrant, each a reflected phantom of the original."
120b: k=2
See: A green binary star and a red nebula in dark space.
Do: The gravitational lens produces mirror images of the red nebula in all four quadrants around the green center.
Grid: Dark space unchanged; green stars persist; red nebula images now appear in four-fold symmetry.
We need to infer rule. From description: green binary star (two green cells?) and red nebula (some red shape). Mirror images of red nebula in all four quadrants around green center. So we have central green region (maybe a 2x2 block) and red pattern around it. The output adds mirrored copies of red pattern across both axes centered on green block. Look at Example1. Input grid 10x10. Green block is 2x2 at rows 4-5 (0-index? Actually rows 4-5 (starting 0) columns 4-5). Red shape: appears as a diagonal line? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input Example1 red cells: Row0: col1,2 (R R) Row1: col1,3 (R at 1, col1; also R at col3) Row2: col2,3 (R R) That's a small shape like a 3x3 block missing some corners? Actually pattern looks like a diagonal line shape. Also there are red cells at rows? only those rows 0-2. No other reds. Output adds more reds: In lower right quadrant mirrored across both axes relative to green block? Let's see output red cells added at rows 5-7 etc. Output rows: Row0: col1,2 and also col7,8 (R R) Row1: col1,3 and col6,8? Actually row1 output: ". R . R . . R . R ." So reds at col1,3,6,8. Row2: ". . R R . . R R . ." reds at col2,3,6,7. Row5: ". . R R . . R R . ." (row5) same as row2 but shifted down? Row5 corresponds to row5 (index5) which is below green block (green rows 3-4? Wait green rows 3-4? Actually green rows 3-4? Let's recount: Input rows 3 and 4 have green block? Input row3: ". . . . G G . . . .", row4 same. So green rows 3 and 4 (0-index). So green block rows 3-4, cols 4-5. Output adds red pattern mirrored across vertical axis through center of green block? Let's see: original red pattern located in upper left quadrant relative to green block (rows 0-2, cols 0-3). Output adds copies in upper right (rows 0-2, cols 6-9?), lower left (rows5-7, cols0-3), lower right (rows5-7, cols6-9). Indeed. Specifically, output rows5-7 have reds similar to rows0-2 but shifted down 5 rows (since green block height 2, distance?). Mirror across both axes: reflect across vertical line through center of green block (between cols4 and5?) Actually green block occupies cols4-5. Mirror of col positions: original col1 becomes col8? Let's compute: width 10. Mirror across center of grid? Not exactly. Mirror across vertical line through center of green block: For col c, mirrored col = (center_line*2 - c - 1?) Let's compute: green block columns 4 and5. Center line between 4 and5? Mirror of col1 (distance 3 left of col4) would be col6? Wait distance from col1 to line between 4-5 is (4 - 1) =3. Mirror would be col5+3 =8? Actually line between 4 and5 is at 4.5. Distance from 1 to 4.5 =3.5. Mirror would be 4.5+3.5=8. So col8. Indeed output has red at col8 (row0 col8). Good. Similarly col2 -> mirror to col7 (distance 2.5 -> 4.5+2.5=7). Output row0 col7 is R. Yes. col3 -> mirror to col6 (distance 1.5 -> 6). Output row0 col6 is '.'? Actually row0 output has ". R R . . . . R R ." So col6 is '.'? Wait positions: indice ... [8979 chars truncated]
"The green buoy bobs at the intersection of two shipping lanes. A red coral formation grows in one quadrant beneath it. The tidal currents, flowing along both lanes, carry coral spawn to settle in every quadrant — each new formation a mirror of the original, reflected across the buoy's crosshairs."
120b: k=1
See: A green buoy and a red coral shape in one quarter of a dark seabed.
Do: Coral propagates to all four quadrants around the green buoy, each colony a reflected copy of the original.
Grid: Same dark seabed; green buoy unmoved; red coral now appears in all four quadrants symmetrically.
We need to infer rule. From example 1: Input grid 10x10. There's a red shape (some pattern) in top-left quadrant? Let's map coordinates. Input shows red R at positions: (0,1),(0,2); (1,1),(1,3); (2,2),(2,3). That's like a small shape maybe a diagonal block? Also green G 2x2 block at (3,4),(3,5),(4,4),(4,5). Output shows original red shape stays, plus copies in other quadrants: appears also in top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right quadrants symmetrically around green buoy (center). Indeed output adds red pattern mirrored across vertical and horizontal axes through the green block center? Let's examine output coordinates: Additional reds at top-right: rows 0-2 columns 7-9? Output row0: ". R R . . . . R R ." So reds at col1,2 and col7,8. Row1: ". R . R . . R . R ." reds at col1,3 and col6,8. Row2: ". . R R . . R R . ." reds at col2,3 and col6,7. So pattern mirrored horizontally across center column? The green block occupies columns 4-5 rows 3-4. The vertical axis likely between columns 4 and5? Actually center of green block is between columns 4 and5? The green block is 2x2, so its center is at intersection of four cells. Mirroring across that center would map left side to right side offset by same distance. Indeed original red shape located left of green (columns 1-3). Mirrored to right side appears at columns 6-8 (since distance from green edge?). Similarly bottom copies appear rows 5-7? Output rows 5-7 have reds similar to rows 0-2 but shifted down. Row5: ". . R R . . R R . ." matches row2 pattern but at rows5-? Actually row5 corresponds to original row2 mirrored vertically. Row6: ". R . R . . R . R ." matches row1. Row7: ". R R . . . . R R ." matches row0. So indeed reflect across both axes. Thus rule: take the colored shape (red) that is in one quadrant relative to a central reference shape (green buoy). Replicate it to the other three quadrants by reflecting across horizontal and vertical axes that pass through the center of the green shape. Now test input: larger grid 18x14? Actually given 18 rows? Let's count lines: there are 18 rows of 14 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . " that's 14 entries. Yes 14 columns, 18 rows. We have red shape: appears rows 2-5 columns 3-6? Let's map coordinates (0-index). Row2: ". . R R R R . . . . . . . .": reds at col2,3,4,5? Wait there are two leading dots then R at col2? Actually indices: col0 dot, col1 dot, col2 R, col3 R, col4 R, col5 R, col6 dot... So reds at 2-5 inclusive (4 cells). Row3: ". . . R . . . . . . . . . .": red at col3 only. Row4: ". . . . R . . . . . . . . .": red at col4. Row5: ". . . . R R . . . . . . . .": reds at col4,5. So shape is like a plus? Let's draw shape coordinates relative to green block. Green block appears rows6-7 columns6-7 (since row6: ". . . . . . G G . . . . . .": G at col6,7). Row7 same. Thus green 2x2 block at rows6-7, cols6-7. Red shape is located upper-left quadrant relative to green. Need to reflect to other quadrants. We need to compute ... [6529 chars truncated]
"The green capacitor sits at the junction of two circuit traces. A red signal pattern pulses along one branch. The junction acts as a signal splitter with phase inversion — routing reflected copies of the red waveform down every branch, until identical patterns propagate in all four directions from the green node."
120b: k=2
See: A green component and a red signal trace on a dark circuit board.
Do: Split and reflect the red signal pattern across both axes of the green junction, populating all four branches.
Grid: Dark board unchanged; green component stays; red traces now extend symmetrically in all four directions.
We need to infer rule. From description: "green component and a red signal trace on a dark circuit board. Split and reflect the red signal pattern across both axes of the green junction, populating all four branches." Interpretation: Input has a green block (2x2) somewhere. Red pattern is some shape near it. Output replicates red pattern mirrored across both axes of the green block (i.e., across vertical and horizontal lines passing through center of green component). Also original red pattern remains? In examples, we see. Example1: Input grid 10x10. Green 2x2 at rows 3-4 (0-index?). Let's index rows 0-9. Input rows: 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5-9 empty. Red pattern appears as a diagonal shape? Let's map coordinates (row,col) where R present: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) That's like a small shape near top left of green. Output shows red pattern also mirrored to bottom right etc. Output rows: 0: . R R . . . . R R . 1: . R . R . . R . R . 2: . . R R . . R R . . 3-4 same green. 5: . . R R . . R R . . 6: . R . R . . R . R . 7: . R R . . . . R R . Rows 8-9 empty. So original red pattern at top left remains (rows0-2). Then mirrored across vertical axis through green? The green block columns 4-5 (0-index). Mirror horizontally across that vertical line: positions (row, col) -> (row, 9-col?) Wait grid width 10. Mirror across center of green block? The green block occupies columns 4 and5. The axis likely between columns 4 and5? Actually vertical axis through the center of green component maybe between columns 4 and5 (since block width 2). Mirror of left side to right side would map col 1->? Let's compute: distance from axis: axis at 4.5 (between 4 and5). col 1 distance -3.5 => mirrored col = 4.5+3.5=8? That's col8. Indeed output has R at (0,7) and (0,8)? Wait output row0: . R R . . . . R R . So reds at col1,2 and col7,8. So mirrored columns 7,8. That matches axis 4.5: col1 -> 8, col2 ->7? Actually col1 distance -3.5 => mirrored col = 4.5+3.5=8. So col1 maps to 8. col2 distance -2.5 => mirrored col = 4.5+2.5=7. So yes mapping. Similarly vertical axis? Mirror across horizontal axis through green block rows 3-4 (center between 3 and4? Actually rows 3 and4). Axis at 3.5. Mirror top rows 0-2 to bottom rows 5-7. Indeed output rows5-7 have same pattern mirrored vertically. Thus rule: take red cells, reflect across both axes defined by the green 2x2 block, generating up to 4 copies (original, horizontal mirror, vertical mirror, both). Keep original unchanged. The board is otherwise unchanged. Example2: Larger grid 20x30? Actually 20 rows, 30 columns. Green block at rows 7-8, columns 9-10 (0-index). Red pattern is a plus shape? Let's examine input red coordinates: rows 3-6 have pattern forming a vertical line of R at col5? Actually look: rows 3-6 have R at column 5? Let's parse: Row3: ". . . . . R . . R . . . ..." So R at col5 and col8? Wa ... [8254 chars truncated]
"The green sacred stone rests at the crossroads of the world. A red spirit emerges from one path. The stone's ancient magic creates three spirit-doubles — each a reflection cast along the cardinal axes of the crossroads — until the red spirit stands guard in all four quarters of the world, symmetrically bound to the stone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A green sacred stone and a red spirit form in a dark mythic void.
Do: The stone conjures three reflected doubles of the red spirit, one for each remaining quarter around the crossroads.
Grid: The dark void persists; the green stone endures; red spirits now occupy all four quarters in mirror symmetry.
"The green spotlight marks the center of the ballroom floor. A red dancer performs a sequence in one quadrant. The choreographer calls for a grand symmetry — three shadow dancers enter from the remaining quadrants, each performing the exact mirror of the original's steps reflected across the floor's central axes, until the formation is perfectly balanced."
120b: k=1
See: A green floor marker and a red dancer's path traced in one quadrant of a dark ballroom.
Do: Three mirrored dancers replicate the red path in the remaining quadrants, reflected across both axes through the green center.
Grid: Same dark ballroom; green marker fixed; red dance paths now fill all four quadrants in bilateral symmetry.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10? Actually given 10 rows each 10 columns. Output also 10x10. In input, there is a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5 (0-index? Let's index from 0). Input rows: 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6-9 empty. Output shows original red pattern in top-left quadrant (rows0-2, cols1-3) unchanged. Also green block unchanged. Then red pattern appears mirrored into other quadrants: bottom-left (rows5-7?), top-right, bottom-right. Let's map coordinates. Input size 10. Green block at rows3-4, cols4-5 (0-index). That's center? The description says green marker at center. Indeed 2x2 green at center of grid (since even dimensions). So quadrants are 5x5 each? Actually grid 10x10, center 2x2 green occupies rows 4-5? Wait rows 3-4 (0-index) are 4th and5th rows. That's middle two rows. Similarly columns 4-5 are middle two columns. So quadrants are 4x4? Let's compute: rows 0-2 top, rows 5-9 bottom? Actually rows 0-2 (3 rows) above green, rows 5-9 (5 rows) below? Not symmetric. Let's examine output: Additional red appears at rows5-7 (indices 5-7) mirroring top pattern but shifted? Output rows5: ". . R R . . R R . ." matches pattern at rows0? Row0 output: ". R R . . . . R R .". So pattern appears mirrored across both axes: top-left original, top-right mirrored horizontally, bottom-left mirrored vertically, bottom-right mirrored both. But note vertical mirroring appears starting at row5 (since green occupies rows3-4). So bottom quadrant rows5-7 correspond to rows2-0 reversed? Let's check: Input top pattern rows0-2. Output bottom rows5-7 show same pattern but maybe reversed order? Row5 output: ". . R R . . R R . ." corresponds to input row2? Input row2: ". . R R . . . . . ." yes matches left side part. Row6 output: ". R . R . . R . R ." matches input row1. Row7 output: ". R R . . . . R R ." matches input row0. So vertical mirroring also flips order (top to bottom). So rule: replicate the pattern of non-green non-black cells (red) from one quadrant (top-left) into other three quadrants by reflecting across the central green block both horizontally and vertically. Thus for test input: larger grid 18x14? Actually given 18 rows? Let's count lines: Provided test input has many rows: appears 18 rows of 14 columns? Let's count columns: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14 columns. Number of rows: lines from 0 to 17? Let's count: they list rows up to row17 (index). I see rows: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 = 18 rows. So grid 18x14 (height 18, width 14). Need to locate green 2x2 block. In input rows 6 and 7 have "G G" at columns 6-7? Let's examine row6: ". . . . . . G G . . . . . . ." columns index 0-13. So G at col6 and7. Row7 same. So green block at rows6-7, cols6-7 (center). Since dimensions even, center is 2x2 block. Now red pattern appears in top-left quadrant? Let's view rows2-5 etc. Input ... [8994 chars truncated]
"The green mineral vein marks a tectonic intersection where two fault lines cross. A red crystal formation juts from one quadrant of the rock face. Pressure along both fault lines forces identical crystalline structures to grow in all four quadrants — each a mirror of the original, reflected across the intersecting faults through the green vein."
120b: fail
See: A green mineral deposit and a red crystal cluster in one section of dark rock.
Do: Tectonic pressure replicates the red crystal structure into all four sections around the green intersection, each reflected across a fault line.
Grid: Dark rock face unchanged; green vein persists; red crystals now appear in all four quadrants with mirror symmetry.
We need to infer rule. From description: green mineral deposit (G) and red crystal cluster (R) in one section of dark rock (.) . Tectonic pressure replicates red crystal structure into all four sections around the green intersection, each reflected across a fault line. So we have a central green block (maybe 2x2) and red shape around it in one quadrant; output replicates that red shape into other quadrants mirrored across vertical/horizontal lines through the green block. Look at Example1. Input grid 10x10. There's a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5, cols 4-5 (0-index?). Actually rows 4-5 (0-index starting 0). Red shape appears in top-left quadrant: pattern of R's forming a diagonal shape? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input Example1: Row0: . R R . . . . . . . Row1: . R . R . . . . . . Row2: . . R R . . . . . . Rows3-4: . . . . G G . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . Rows6-9 all dots. So red shape occupies rows0-2, cols1-3 maybe. It's like a small shape. Output Example1: Red shape appears also in bottom-left, top-right, bottom-right quadrants mirrored across green block. Let's see output rows: Row0: . R R . . . . R R . Row1: . R . R . . R . R . Row2: . . R R . . R R . . Row3-4 unchanged green. Row5: . . R R . . R R . . Row6: . R . R . . R . R . Row7: . R R . . . . R R . Rows8-9 all dots. So indeed red shape appears mirrored across both axes: original at top-left (rows0-2, cols1-3). Mirror across vertical axis through green block (center column between col4-5?) yields top-right shape at rows0-2, cols6-8 (positions). Mirror across horizontal axis yields bottom-left at rows5-7, cols1-3. Mirror both yields bottom-right at rows5-7, cols6-8. Thus rule: Identify a green region (maybe rectangular) that acts as center. Identify red pattern in one quadrant (the quadrant that contains red in input). Replicate it to other three quadrants by mirroring across the central axes defined by the green region's bounding box. Example2: Input larger 20x20. Green 2x2 block at rows7-8, cols9-10? Actually rows7-8 (0-index) have G G at cols9-10 (since there are spaces). Red shape appears in top-left quadrant: a plus shape? Let's examine. Rows3-6 have R's forming a shape: rows3-6 columns5-9 maybe. Let's map: Row3: . . . . . R . . R . . . ... So R at col5 and col8? Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6: . . . . . R R R R . . . So row6 has R at col5-8 contiguous. Thus red shape is like a T? Actually shape: a 2x2 block? Let's visualize coordinates relative to green block center. Green block at rows7-8, cols9-10 (0-index). The red shape appears above and left of that block (top-left quadrant). Output replicates shape to other quadrants: we see in output rows3-6 same as input (top-left). Then rows9-12 (below green) have mirrored shapes. Indeed output rows9-12 show R pattern similar to rows3-6 but mirrored vertically. Also rows3-6 columns after green show mirrored horizontally (positions after col10). And rows9-12 both axes. Thus rule confirmed. Now test inp ... [6112 chars truncated]
"The green pat of butter melts at the center of the pan, and the red spice paste spread on one side blooms outward — its flavor pattern echoing into every quadrant of the dish until the plate is perfectly garnished from every angle."
120b: k=2
See: A green dollop sits centered with a red drizzle pattern nearby on a dark plate.
Do: Fold the red garnish as if creasing a napkin twice through the green center, pressing the pattern into all four sections of the plate.
Grid: Same dark plate, same green center, red garnish now decorates all four quadrants symmetrically.
We need to infer rule. From description: green dollop centered with red drizzle pattern nearby on dark plate. Fold the red garnish as if creasing a napkin twice through the green center, pressing pattern into all four sections of the plate. So we have a central green block (2x2?) and red pattern around it, which is mirrored into four quadrants. Look at Example1. Input grid 10x10. Green 2x2 at rows 4-5, cols 4-5 (0-index?). Actually rows 4-5 (0-index starting 0). Red pattern: appears as a diagonal shape? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input Example1: Row0: . R R . . . . . . . Row1: . R . R . . . . . . Row2: . . R R . . . . . . Rows3-4: green block at (3,4)-(4,5) (since row3 col4 G, col5 G; row4 same). Actually row3 index 3: ". . . . G G . . . ." Row4 index4: same. Other rows empty. Output Example1: Rows0-2 have red pattern also mirrored to right side columns 7-8? Let's see row0 output: ". R R . . . . R R ." So original red at cols1-2, now also at cols7-8. Row1 output: ". R . R . . R . R ." Original at cols1,3; new at cols6,8? Actually row1 output: positions: col1 R, col3 R, col6 R, col8 R. Row2 output: ". . R R . . R R . .": original at cols2-3, new at cols6-7. Also later rows5-7 have red pattern mirrored vertically: rows5-7 output show red pattern similar to rows0-2 but shifted down? Row5: ". . R R . . R R . .": that's same as row2 but at row5. Row6: ". R . R . . R . R .": same as row1 at row6. Row7: ". R R . . . . R R .": same as row0 at row7. Thus the red pattern is replicated into four quadrants around the green center: original top-left quadrant (rows0-2, cols0-3?) Actually original pattern occupies top-left area relative to green block. Then it's mirrored horizontally to top-right, vertically to bottom-left, both to bottom-right. Green block stays same. Thus rule: Identify central green region (maybe 2x2). The red pattern located in one quadrant (top-left) is reflected across both axes through the center of green block, filling other three quadrants. Example2: Larger grid 20x20. Green block 2x2 at rows7-8, cols9-10? Actually rows7 and 8 have "G G" at columns 9-10 (0-index). Input shows red pattern: a shape of a plus? Let's examine: rows3-6 have red vertical/horizontal lines forming a shape left of green. Input rows3-6: row3: "... R . . R ..." Actually row3: ". . . . . R . . R . . . ..." So red at col5 and col8? Wait need coordinates. Row3: columns: index0-? Let's count: there are 30 columns? Actually given 30 columns? The line shows 30 entries. Let's compute: row3: ". . . . . R . . R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's 30 columns. Red at col5 and col8 (0-index). Row4 same, row5 same, row6: ". . . . . R R R R . . . ..." red block 4 contiguous at cols5-8. So pattern is like a T shape? Actually it's a 2x2 plus extra? The pattern appears in top-left quadrant relative to green block at rows7-8, cols9-10. The output replicates pattern into other quadrants: we see rows3-6 same as input, plus also rows9 ... [7142 chars truncated]
"The green chord sustains at the center of the staff, while a red melodic phrase plays in one voice — then the counterpoint answers in inversion, retrograde, and retrograde-inversion, until all four canonical transformations ring out simultaneously around the tonal center."
120b: k=2
See: A green tonal anchor and a red melodic fragment in a silent dark space.
Do: Compose the three remaining canonical transformations of the red phrase, each reflected through the green center, so all four voices sound together.
Grid: The dark staff holds the green anchor unchanged, with the red phrase appearing in all four contrapuntal forms.
We need to infer rule. From description: "green tonal anchor" unchanged, "red melodic fragment" appears in all four contrapuntal forms (canonical transformations) reflected through green center. So we have a red shape that is transformed by rotations/reflections? In example1 input: a small red shape (like a diagonal line?) Let's map coordinates. Example1 input grid 10x10. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input red cells: Row0: col1,2 Row1: col1,3 Row2: col2,3 That's a shape like a 2x2 block offset? Actually pattern: looks like a small "Z" shape? Let's list coordinates: (0,1),(0,2); (1,1),(1,3); (2,2),(2,3). That's like a shape maybe a 3x3 with missing some cells. Green anchor: rows3-4 cols4-5 (2x2 block). unchanged. Output: red appears also in other quadrants mirrored across green center? Output shows red also at rows5-7 etc. Let's see output red cells: Row0: col1,2 and also col7,8 (mirrored) Row1: col1,3 and col6,8? Actually row1 output: ". R . R . . R . R ." => reds at col1,3,6,8. Row2: ". . R R . . R R . ." => reds at col2,3,6,7. Row5: ". . R R . . R R . ." => row5 reds at col2,3,6,7. Row6: ". R . R . . R . R ." => row6 reds at col1,3,6,8. Row7: ". R R . . . . R R ." => row7 reds at col1,2,7,8. So the original shape appears in top-left quadrant (rows0-2, cols0-3) and also mirrored to top-right (cols6-9), bottom-left (rows5-7, cols0-3) and bottom-right (rows5-7, cols6-9). The green anchor is at center rows3-4 cols4-5. Thus rule: replicate the red pattern into four quadrants by reflecting across both horizontal and vertical axes that pass through the green block center. Essentially reflect across the vertical line through center of green block (between cols4 and5?) Actually green block occupies cols4-5, rows3-4. Its center is between those cells? The reflection axis likely passes through the center of green block (midpoint). So reflect shape across vertical axis (mirror left to right) and across horizontal axis (mirror top to bottom), generating up to 4 copies (original plus reflections). In example1, original already in top-left; reflections produce top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Example2: larger grid 20x20. Input red shape appears as a vertical line? Let's examine: rows3-6 have red pattern: rows3-5 have red at col5 and col8? Actually row3: ". . . . . R . . R . ..." So reds at col5 and col8. Row4 same, row5 same, row6: ". . . . . R R R R . ..." reds at col5-8 contiguous. So shape is like a 4x? plus vertical lines. Green block rows7-8 cols9-10 (2x2). Output shows red pattern replicated in four quadrants similarly. Indeed output rows3-6 same as input (top-left). Then rows9-12 have similar pattern (bottom-left). Also rows3-6 columns mirrored to right side (col? positions 11-14?). Let's verify output row3: ". . . . . R . . R . . R . . R . . . . .". So reds at col5,8,11,14. That's original plus mirrored across vertical axis through green center (between cols9-10). Similarly bottom rows have both sides. Thus rule confirm ... [6911 chars truncated]
"The green coin marks center court. A red formation of players occupies one quadrant. The coach calls 'full-court mirror' — and identical formations sprint to fill every quadrant, as if the play diagram were folded twice through the center mark."
120b: k=1
See: A green center mark and a red player formation on a dark field.
Do: Deploy matching red formations into all remaining quadrants, reflected across both the vertical and horizontal lines through the green mark.
Grid: Same dark field, green mark unmoved, red formations now occupy all four quadrants in mirror symmetry.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Actually example input shows 10 rows, each 10 columns. Output also 10x10. In input, there is a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5 (0-index? Actually rows 4-5). Red formation appears in top-left quadrant? Let's map. Input example: rows (0-index): 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5-9 all dots. So red shape is like a triangle? Let's plot coordinates of R: (0,1),(0,2); (1,1),(1,3); (2,2),(2,3). That's like a small shape. Green block at (3,4),(3,5),(4,4),(4,5) (2x2). The rule: replicate red formation into other quadrants mirrored across vertical and horizontal lines through green mark (center). The green mark is 2x2, so its center lines are between its rows and columns? The vertical line through green mark likely passes through its columns (4 and5). Horizontal line through rows 3 and4. So reflect red shape across those lines to other quadrants. In output, we see red also appears in bottom-left quadrant (rows 5-7?) Let's examine output rows: 0: . R R . . . . R R . 1: . R . R . . R . R . 2: . . R R . . R R . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . R R . . R R . . 6: . R . R . . R . R . 7: . R R . . . . R R . 8-9 all dots. So indeed red shape appears mirrored across vertical line (to right side) and also mirrored across horizontal line (to bottom). The bottom-left quadrant (rows5-7, cols0-2) contains same shape as top-left but shifted down. Bottom-right quadrant (rows5-7, cols7-9?) Actually columns 7-9 have shape mirrored both. Thus rule: take the pattern of non-green non-black (red) in one quadrant (the quadrant containing the pattern) and reflect it across both axes defined by the green block's center lines, filling other quadrants with mirrored copies. The original pattern remains. Now test input: larger grid 18x14? Actually given 18 rows? Let's count lines: Provided test input lines: appears 18 rows of 14 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . .". That's 14 entries. There are 18 rows (0-17). So grid 18x14. We have green 2x2 block at rows 6-7, columns 6-7 (0-index). Indeed lines: row6: ". . . . . . G G . . . . . ." row7 same. Red formation appears in top area rows 2-5 columns? Let's list red coordinates. Rows: row2: ". . R R R R . . . . . . . ." Indices: columns 2,3,4,5 are R. row3: ". . . R . . . . . . . . . ." col3 R. row4: ". . . . R . . . . . . . . ." col4 R. row5: ". . . . R R . . . . . . . ." col4,5 R. So shape is like a kind of T? Let's map coordinates relative to green center lines. Green block columns 6-7, rows 6-7. So vertical line(s) at columns 6 and7? The reflection across vertical line would map left side to right side mirrored across the line between columns 6 and7? In example, green block at columns 4-5, and red shape originally in columns 1-3 (left side). Mirrored shape appears at columns 7-9 (right side). So mapping: distance from left side of green bloc ... [11350 chars truncated]
"The green eye of the storm holds eerily still. Red lightning crackles in one quadrant of the sky — then the storm's rotational symmetry asserts itself, and identical bolts arc through every remaining quadrant, each a perfect reflection around the calm green center."
120b: k=1
See: A green eye and red lightning in one region of a dark sky.
Do: The storm replicates the red lightning pattern across both axes of the green eye until all four quadrants carry matching bolts.
Grid: The dark sky retains its dimensions; the green eye persists; red lightning now fills all four quadrants symmetrically.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10? Actually given 10 rows each 10 columns. Input shows a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5 columns 5-6 (0-index?). Red pattern: looks like a diagonal shape? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input rows: 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . Red pattern appears in upper left quadrant: shape maybe like a rotated L? Let's list red cells: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) That's it. Green block at (3,4),(3,5),(4,4),(4,5). Output grid same size 10x10. Output shows red pattern replicated to other quadrants symmetrically around green eye (center). Let's see output rows: 0: . R R . . . . R R . 1: . R . R . . R . R . 2: . . R R . . R R . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . R R . . R R . . 6: . R . R . . R . R . 7: . R R . . . . R R . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . So red pattern appears also mirrored across both axes of the green block. The green block is at rows 3-4, cols 4-5. The axes are vertical line through center of green block? The green block is 2x2, so its center is between rows 3-4? Actually rows 3 and 4 (0-index) are the green rows. The vertical axis likely passes between columns 4 and5? Wait green occupies columns 4 and5. So axis maybe through middle of green block: vertical axis between col4 and5? Horizontal axis between row3 and4? That would make quadrants: top-left (rows 0-2, cols 0-3), top-right (rows0-2, cols6-9), bottom-left (rows5-9?, cols0-3), bottom-right (rows5-9, cols6-9). Indeed red pattern appears in top-left (original), top-right (mirrored horizontally), bottom-left (mirrored vertically), bottom-right (mirrored both). The pattern is placed such that its relative position to the axes matches. Specifically original red pattern coordinates relative to axes: Let's define origin at the center of green block (between rows3-4 and cols4-5). So coordinates (row offset, col offset) where offset measured from that center. For each red cell, compute offset: For cell (0,1): row offset = 0 - 3.5 = -3.5? Actually center row = (3+4)/2 = 3.5. So offset = -3.5. col offset = 1 - 4.5 = -3.5. So (-3.5,-3.5). Similarly (0,2): (-3.5,-2.5). (1,1): (-2.5,-3.5). (1,3): (-2.5,-1.5). (2,2): (-1.5,-2.5). (2,3): (-1.5,-1.5). So pattern is a small shape. Now output includes same offsets in other quadrants: For top-right, we reflect col offset sign: (row offset same, col offset positive). So positions: row = center row + offset row, col = center col + (+abs(col offset)). That yields cells at (0,8?) Let's compute: For (-3.5,-3.5) reflect col => (-3.5,+3.5) => row -3.5 => row 0, col = 4.5+3.5=8. So (0,8) red. Indeed output row0 col8 is R. Also (0,9?) Wait original had two reds at (0,1),(0,2). Mirror gives (0,8),(0,9). Yes output row0 col8 and col9 are R. S ... [7361 chars truncated]
"The green cornerstone anchors where two walls meet. A red mosaic adorns one wing of the building. The architect demands classical symmetry — the mosaic must be mirrored across both axes of the cornerstone until every wing bears an identical but reflected tile pattern."
120b: k=2
See: A green cornerstone and a red mosaic fragment in a dark architectural void.
Do: Reflect the red mosaic across both the horizontal and vertical planes passing through the green stone, completing all four wings.
Grid: The dark void, green cornerstone, and four symmetrical red mosaic panels fill the original footprint.
We need to infer rule. From description: "green cornerstone and a red mosaic fragment in a dark architectural void. Reflect the red mosaic across both the horizontal and vertical planes passing through the green stone, completing all four wings." So we have a green block (2x2?) at center. Red pattern around it is some shape that is reflected across both axes through the green block, producing symmetric pattern in four quadrants. In Example1: Input grid 10x10. Green G at positions (row4-5, col5-6) (0-index?). Actually rows 4-5 (0-index 3-4) columns 5-6 (4-5). That's a 2x2 green block. Red pattern: appears as a diagonal shape top-left of green? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input Example1 red cells: Row0: col1,2 (R R) Row1: col1,3 (R at 1, col1; also R at col3) Row2: col2,3 (R R) That's a small shape like a 3x3 block missing some corners? Actually shape looks like a diagonal line? Let's list coordinates: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) Also there is maybe more? That's all red in input. Green block at (3,4),(3,5),(4,4),(4,5). Output adds more reds: appears to reflect across both axes through green block, generating reds in other quadrants. Output red cells: Rows0: col1,2 and also col7,8 (R R) symmetrical horizontally across green center column? Green center columns are 4 and5. Mirror of col1 across vertical line between 4 and5? Let's compute: distance from col1 to center line? The vertical axis passes through the green stone? The green block is 2 columns wide, so axis maybe between columns 4 and5? Or through the center of the block? The description: "horizontal and vertical planes passing through the green stone". If green is 2x2, the plane passes through its center? Could be the lines that cut through the middle of the green block (i.e., between the two columns and between the two rows). So reflection across that line would map col1 to col8? Let's compute: width 10, columns 0-9. Mirror across line between col4 and5: mapping col x to 9 - x? Actually reflection across central vertical line (between 4 and5) maps column c to 9 - c? Let's test: c=1 -> 8, yes output has red at col8? Actually output row0 has reds at col7,8? Wait row0 output: ". R R . . . . R R ." So reds at col1,2 and col7,8. That's 1->7? 2->8? Mirror across center line between 4 and5: mapping c' = 9 - c? 9-1=8, 9-2=7. So they swapped order: 1 maps to 8, 2 maps to 7. Output shows reds at 7 and8 (order reversed). So yes reflection across vertical axis yields reds at columns 7 and8 (positions reversed). Good. Similarly horizontal reflection across line between rows 3 and4 (since green rows 3,4). Mirror row0 to row7? Let's compute: rows 0-9, line between 3 and4. Mirror mapping r' = 9 - r? 9-0=9, but output row9 has no reds. Actually output row7 has reds? Let's see output rows: row0 has reds both sides. Row1 has reds at col1,3 and col6,8? Actually output row1: ". R . R . . R . R ." So reds at col1,3 and col6,8. That's mirrored horizontally? Input ... [9194 chars truncated]
"The green citadel stands at the crossroads. A red battalion approaches from one direction. The general, fearing encirclement, imagines mirror armies advancing from every approach — and so deploys red defenses in all four quadrants around the citadel, each a reflected copy of the approaching force."
120b: k=1
See: A green fortress and a red troop formation on a dark battlefield.
Do: Clone the red formation into every quadrant around the green citadel, each reflected across the fortress's defensive axes.
Grid: Same dark battlefield dimensions; green citadel unchanged; red formations now surround it in four-fold symmetry.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10? Actually given 10 rows each 10 columns. Green 2x2 block at rows 4-5, cols 5-6 (0-index?). Red shape appears top-left quadrant? Let's map. Input example1 grid coordinates (row, col starting 0). Let's write rows: 0: . R R . . . . . . . 1: . R . R . . . . . . 2: . . R R . . . . . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . Red shape appears like a diagonal cluster maybe a 3x3? Let's mark red cells coordinates: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) That's shape. Output grid same size 10x10. Output shows original green unchanged at same location rows3-4 cols4-5 (0-index). Red shape appears also in other quadrants mirrored across green's axes. Let's see output rows: 0: . R R . . . . R R . 1: . R . R . . R . R . 2: . . R R . . R R . . 3: . . . . G G . . . . 4: . . . . G G . . . . 5: . . R R . . R R . . 6: . R . R . . R . R . 7: . R R . . . . R R . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . We see original red shape at top-left (rows0-2, cols1-3). Also mirrored to top-right (rows0-2, cols6-8). Also mirrored to bottom-left (rows5-7, cols1-3). Also bottom-right (rows5-7, cols6-8). So fourfold symmetry around the green block center. The green block is 2x2 at rows3-4, cols4-5. The axes are vertical line between cols5 and 6? Actually center between columns 4-5? The green block occupies columns 4-5 (0-index). Its center is between 4 and5? For symmetry, reflect across vertical line through middle of green block (between col4 and5?) Let's compute: original red shape's columns relative to green block: left side columns 1-3. Mirror to right side columns? In output right side columns are 6-8. That's offset: distance from green block's right edge (col5) to mirrored shape start at col6 (adjacent). So reflection across vertical line between col5 and col6 (i.e., after green block). Similarly vertical reflection across horizontal line between rows4 and5 (below green). So shape is duplicated into four quadrants around green block. Thus rule: Identify green region (any shape? maybe a rectangle). Keep it unchanged. Find red shape(s) that are in one quadrant (top-left) relative to green block. Replicate them into other three quadrants by reflecting across the central axes defined by green block's bounding box. Now test input: larger grid 18x14? Actually given 18 rows? Let's count rows: Provided lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." repeated many times. Let's count rows: after header there are 18 rows? Let's count lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . R R R R . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . R . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . R . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . R R . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . G G . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . G G . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 . . . . . . . . . ... [8741 chars truncated]
"The green spotlight holds center stage. A red actor strikes a pose in one quarter of the stage. Then the mirrors descend — and three phantom doubles appear, each reflecting the actor's pose across the vertical and horizontal axes of the spotlight, until the stage holds a perfect tableau vivant in four-fold symmetry."
120b: k=1
See: A green spotlight and a red performer's silhouette on a dark stage.
Do: Summon reflected doubles of the red silhouette into every quarter of the stage, mirrored through the green spotlight's center.
Grid: Dark stage unchanged in size; green light persists; red silhouettes now appear in all four quarters.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input grid 10x10. There's a green 2x2 block at rows 4-5 (0-index? Actually rows 4-5). Red shape appears in upper left quadrant? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input red cells: (0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,3) (2,2),(2,3) That's shape like a small diagonal cluster. Green cells: (3,4),(3,5),(4,4),(4,5) a 2x2 block. Output: original green unchanged. Red appears also mirrored into other quadrants relative to green center. Output red cells list: Original ones remain? Let's see output row0: . R R . . . . R R . So red at (0,1),(0,2) original, plus new at (0,7),(0,8). Row1: . R . R . . R . R . => original (1,1),(1,3) plus new at (1,6),(1,8). Row2: . . R R . . R R . . => original (2,2),(2,3) plus new at (2,6),(2,7). Row5: . . R R . . R R . . => new red at rows5? Actually row5 originally empty. Output row5 has red at (5,2),(5,3) and (5,6),(5,7). Row6: . R . R . . R . R . => red at (6,1),(6,3) and (6,6),(6,8). Row7: . R R . . . . R R . => red at (7,1),(7,2) and (7,7),(7,8). So pattern: original red shape appears in top-left quadrant (relative to green). Then reflected across vertical axis through center of green to top-right quadrant. Also reflected across horizontal axis to bottom-left, and both axes to bottom-right. Green center: green block occupies rows3-4, cols4-5. Center maybe between rows3.5 and 4.5? Actually center point at (3.5,4.5) maybe. Mirror across vertical line x = 4.5? Let's test: original red at (0,1) mirrored across vertical line x=4.5 gives x' = 9 - 1? Wait formula: x' = 2*cx - x - 1? Let's compute: distance from line: d = cx - x - 0.5? Might be easier: grid width 10. Mirror across center column between 4 and5 (0-index). Mirror of column 1 becomes column 8? Indeed output has column 8 (0-index) red. So mapping: col' = 9 - col? Since 1 -> 8, 2 ->7, 3->6? Actually original col3 (row1 col3) mirrored to col6? Output row1 col6 is red. 9-3=6 correct. So mirror across vertical center of whole grid? Not exactly; but 9-col works for width 10. That is mirror across vertical midline of whole grid (between col4 and5). Similarly horizontal mirror across row midline (between rows4 and5) gives row' = 9 - row. Indeed original rows 0,1,2 become rows 9,8,7? But output shows new reds at rows5,6,7 not 9,8,7. Wait original rows 0 mirrored to row9? Not present. Actually new reds appear at rows5-7, not 9-? Let's examine: original rows 0-2 produce new rows 5-7 (i.e., 5 = 9-4? hmm). Let's compute: row0 mirrored across horizontal center (between 4 and5) would be row9? Since 9-0=9. Not present. So maybe mirroring within each quadrant relative to green block's center (row3.5, col4.5). For a point (r,c), the mirrored across vertical line through green center: c' = 2*4.5 - c = 9 - c. That matches earlier. For horizontal: r' = 2*3.5 - r = 7 - r. Let's test: r=0 => r'=7. Indeed new reds appear at rows7 (for original row0). Indeed output row7 has reds at columns 1,2 and 7,8 (mirrored horizon ... [6893 chars truncated]
"The green topiary marks the center of the formal garden. A red flower bed blooms in one parterre. The garden designer, devoted to French symmetry, plants identical beds in every remaining parterre — each a mirror image reflected across the central topiary's north-south and east-west axes."
120b: fail
See: A green topiary centerpiece and a red flower bed pattern in a dark garden plot.
Do: Plant reflected copies of the red bed in all four parterres around the green center, achieving bilateral symmetry on both axes.
Grid: The dark garden keeps its borders; the green topiary stays; red beds now bloom in all four symmetric sections.
We need to infer rule: From description: green center stays, red pattern reflected into four quadrants around green, achieving bilateral symmetry on both axes. In examples, we see input with red shape on top-left quadrant? Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 10x10. There's a red shape in top-left area: coordinates (row0 col1-2), (row1 col1 and col3), (row2 col2-3). That's like a small shape. Green 2x2 block at rows3-4 cols4-5. Output: The red shape appears also mirrored to top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right quadrants around green center? Let's see output rows0-2 have red also at right side columns? Row0: ". R R . . . . R R ." So original red at cols1-2, new red at cols7-8. That's mirrored horizontally across vertical axis through center? The grid width 10, green block at cols4-5 (center columns). Mirror of col1-2 across center would be cols? Mirror across line between col4-5? For width 10, indices 0-9. Mirror of col1 -> 8? Actually distance from center line: center line between 4 and5. col1 distance = 3 left of left center? Mirror would be col8? Indeed output has red at col7-8? Wait col7-8 are positions 7 and8. That's distance 3 right of right center? Let's compute: col1 -> mirror = 8? Yes 1->8 (since 1+8=9). col2 -> mirror =7 (2+7=9). So output has red at 7,8 (order reversed). Indeed row0 has red at 7,8. Good. Similarly vertical mirroring: rows0-2 mirrored to rows7-9? Output rows7-9 have red pattern similar. Row7: ". R R . . . . R R ." matches row0. Row8: ". R . R . . R . R ." matches row1. Row9: ". . R R . . R R . ." matches row2. Yes. Thus rule: take red shape (R) and reflect it across both horizontal and vertical axes that pass through the green block (center). Keep original and add copies in other three quadrants. The green block remains unchanged. The rest stays black. Example2: Input larger 20x20. There's a red shape (maybe a plus?) around rows3-6 columns5-9? Let's locate: rows3-6 have red pattern forming a shape: rows3-5 have R at col5 and col8? Actually row3: col5 R, col8 R. Row4 same, row5 same, row6 has R at col5-8 (four in a row). That's like a vertical line of three pairs plus a horizontal line at row6. Green block at rows7-8 cols9-10 (2x2). Output shows red pattern replicated to right side of green (mirrored horizontally) and also below (mirrored vertically) and both. Indeed output rows3-6 have red also at columns? Let's check output row3: ". . . . . R . . R . . R . . R . . . . .". So original reds at col5 and col8, new at col11 and col14? Actually need compute. Original width 20, green at cols9-10 (0-index). Mirror across vertical line between 9-10: col5 -> mirror = 14? Since 5+14=19. Indeed new red at col14. col8 -> mirror = 11 (8+11=19). So output row3 has reds at 5,8,11,14. Yes. Also vertical mirroring across horizontal line between rows7-8: rows3-6 mirrored to rows13-10? Actually output rows9-12 have red pattern as well. Row9 (index9) corresponds to mirror of row6 (index6) across line between 7-8: 6 dis ... [8209 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains two distinct colored objects on a black background. The first is an X-shaped directional marker: four cells of one color arranged at the four diagonal neighbor positions around an implicit center cell (which is black). This forms a small diamond/X pattern spanning a 3x3 area. The second object is an asymmetric shape of a different color, located in one of the four diagonal quadrants relative to the X-marker's center. The X-marker and the shape do not overlap.
Do: 1. Locate the X-shaped marker: find four same-colored cells arranged at positions (r-1,c-1), (r-1,c+1), (r+1,c-1), (r+1,c+1) for some center (r,c). This center (r,c) is the symmetry anchor. 2. Identify the other colored shape. Compute each of its cell positions as offsets (dr, dc) relative to the center (r,c). 3. Reflect the shape into all four diagonal quadrants by generating four copies of each offset: (dr, dc), (-dr, dc), (dr, -dc), and (-dr, -dc). 4. Place all four reflected copies of the shape onto the grid in addition to the original X-marker, which remains unchanged. The background stays black everywhere else.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly. The background is black (.). The X-shaped marker remains at its original position in the output. The grid must be large enough to contain all four reflections of the shape; reflections that would fall outside the grid boundary do not occur in valid inputs.
"A compass rose casts reflections of a traveler into every cardinal shadow."
120b: k=1
See: On a dark plain, a compass rose glows—four sentinel gems set at the diagonal points around an invisible hub, forming a small X of light. Somewhere in one quadrant of the plain, a wandering figure (a different-colored shape) has settled, as if a traveler who arrived from just one direction.
Do: The compass rose is a hall of mirrors aimed at the four diagonal winds. When the traveler stands in one quadrant, the rose catches their silhouette and projects it into the three empty quadrants—flipping it across the rose's invisible crosshairs so that every quadrant receives its own reflected twin. The traveler multiplies into four, each a mirror image appropriate to its quadrant, while the compass rose itself remains unmoved and unchanged at the center of it all.
Grid: The dark plain keeps its original dimensions. The compass rose stays planted where it was. Four versions of the traveler now populate the grid, arranged symmetrically around the rose's hub like four dancers reflected in a pond. The darkness fills everything the light does not touch.
We need to understand the transformation. In example 1, input grid shows a pattern: there is a central "compass rose" of four sentinel gems at diagonal points around an invisible hub, forming a small X of light. In example, the sentinel gems are maybe color A? Actually in input example 1, we see A's forming a small X? Let's examine. Input example 1 grid (14x14). Let's locate A's: At row 3 (0-index?), row index 3 (fourth row) column 8 has A. Row 4: columns 7,8,9 have A A A. Row5: columns 6,7,8 have A A A. That's like a small shape maybe a triangle? Actually looks like a 3x3 block offset? Let's map coordinates. Rows 0-13. Row3 col8 A. Row4 col7-9 A A A. Row5 col6-8 A A A. That's like a diagonal line of A's forming a shape maybe a "compass rose"? The description: four sentinel gems set at diagonal points around an invisible hub, forming a small X of light. So sentinel gems are at four diagonal points around a center. In example, maybe the A's are the compass rose? Let's see pattern: The A's form an X shape? Let's list coordinates: (3,8), (4,7),(4,8),(4,9), (5,6),(5,7),(5,8). That's not symmetric X; it's like a small shape maybe a rotated L? Hmm. But also there are G's forming a shape elsewhere: rows 6-8 have G pattern: row6 col4 G, col6 G? Actually row6: ". . . . G . G . . . . . . . ." So G at col4 and col6. Row7: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . ." G at col5. Row8: same as row6. That's a small X shape of G's centered at (7,5). That's likely the compass rose (four sentinel gems). Indeed G's are at diagonal points around center (7,5). The pattern: positions (6,4), (6,6), (7,5), (8,4), (8,6). That's a plus? Actually that's a small X: top-left, top-right, center, bottom-left, bottom-right. That's 5 points forming an X shape. So sentinel gems are G's. Thus the compass rose is G's. The traveler is a different-colored shape located in one quadrant relative to the rose. In input, there is a shape of A's located in upper right quadrant relative to the rose? Let's find rose center: (7,5). Quadrants: upper-left rows<7, cols<5; upper-right rows<7, cols>5; lower-left rows>7, cols<5; lower-right rows>7, cols>5. A shape coordinates: rows 3-5, cols 6-9. Those are rows less than 7, cols greater than 5 => upper-right quadrant. So traveler is A shape. In output, we see A shape replicated in all four quadrants, mirrored appropriately. Let's verify output: A's appear also in other quadrants: In output rows 3-5 same as input but shifted? Actually output row3: ". . . . . . . . A . . . . . ." Wait row3 col8? Let's check output row3: ". . . . . . . . A . . . . . .". That's A at col8 (same as input). Row4: ". A A A . . . A A A . . . .". So now there are two groups of A's: one at left side (col1-3?) Actually row4: positions col1,2,3 are A A A (that's left side). And also col7-9 A A A (right side). So left side group is mirrored to upper-left quadrant. Row5: ". . A A A . A A A . . . .". So left group at col2-4? Actually row5 col2,3,4 A A A (mir ... [7938 chars truncated]
"A cell's crossed chromosomes anchor mitosis, and the organelle nearby is replicated into every daughter quadrant of the dividing cytoplasm."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A crossed chromosome structure made of one color sits at the division center. A single organelle cluster of another color drifts in one quadrant of the cell.
Do: The chromosome stays fixed as the spindle axis. The organelle undergoes mitotic division, duplicating itself symmetrically into all four quadrants around the chromosomal cross, as though the cell has split in both axes simultaneously.
Grid: Grid dimensions unchanged. The crossed structure remains. Four copies of the organelle appear, reflected across both axes defined by the cross center. Background stays black.
"A pulsar radiates from four cardinal beams crossing at a neutron core; a nearby nebula is gravitationally lensed into four phantom images around the stellar anchor."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four beam-points of one color form a cross around an invisible neutron core. A nebula of another color drifts in one diagonal region.
Do: The pulsar beams remain fixed. The nebula is gravitationally lensed, producing four symmetric images reflected across both axes through the pulsar's core.
Grid: Sky dimensions unchanged. Pulsar beams persist. Four lensed nebula images appear. Dark space remains black.
"A navigation buoy blinks at the crossing of four diagonal channel markers; a ship's wake in one quarter of the harbor is reflected by the still water into all four quarters."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four diagonal channel markers of one color form a cross around the buoy's position. A ship's wake of another color trails through one quarter.
Do: The channel markers stay anchored. The wake is reflected across both harbor axes through the buoy center, producing four symmetric wake patterns.
Grid: Harbor dimensions unchanged. Channel markers persist. Four wake reflections spread across all quarters. Open water remains black.
"A junction box sits where four diagonal traces cross on the circuit board; a component cluster in one quadrant is duplicated by the layout tool into all four quadrants for balanced impedance."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four diagonal trace endpoints of one color converge at a junction. A component cluster of another color is placed in one quadrant.
Do: The junction remains fixed. The component cluster is mirrored across both axes through the junction point, placing identical copies in all four quadrants of the board.
Grid: Board dimensions unchanged. Junction traces persist. Four reflected component clusters appear. Empty board remains black.
"Janus gazes from a crossroads marked by four sacred stones; a pilgrim's offering left at one diagonal shrine is multiplied by divine will to appear at every shrine."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four sacred stones of one color mark the diagonal points of a crossroads. A pilgrim's offering of another color rests near one diagonal direction.
Do: The sacred stones remain eternal. The offering is divinely replicated into all four diagonal quadrants around the crossroads, reflected across both axes.
Grid: Sacred ground dimensions unchanged. Crossroads stones persist. Four reflected offerings appear. Barren earth remains black.
"Four dancers in a diamond hold the formation's center; a soloist's gesture in one diagonal is mirrored by the corps de ballet into all four diagonals of the stage."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four formation-holders of one color mark diagonal positions around a center point. A soloist's gesture of another color extends into one diagonal.
Do: The formation-holders remain still. The soloist's gesture is mirrored across both stage axes through the center, producing four symmetric gestures in every diagonal.
Grid: Stage dimensions unchanged. Formation markers persist. Four mirrored gestures appear. Empty stage remains black.
"A fault intersection is marked by four displaced strata at the crossing point; a mineral deposit in one fault block is repeated by tectonic symmetry into all four blocks."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four displaced strata of one color mark the diagonal corners of a fault intersection. A mineral deposit of another color lies in one fault block.
Do: The fault markers remain fixed. The mineral deposit is reflected across both fault planes through the intersection, producing four symmetric deposits in all fault blocks.
Grid: Terrain dimensions unchanged. Fault markers persist. Four reflected mineral deposits appear. Bare rock remains black.
"A pinch of saffron threads marks the center of the plate; a garnish placed in one corner is mirrored by the chef's hand into every quadrant for perfect plating symmetry."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Saffron threads form a small X at the plate's focal point. A garnish of a different ingredient sits off to one diagonal side.
Do: Keep the saffron cross untouched. Replicate the garnish into all four diagonal quadrants around the saffron center, as a chef would for symmetrical fine-dining presentation.
Grid: Same grid size. The X-mark of saffron persists. Four reflected copies of the garnish fill the plate's quadrants. Empty space remains clean.
"A tuning fork's twin prongs vibrate at the still point, and a melody fragment heard in one register echoes in inversion and retrograde across all four voices of a fugue."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tuning fork shape of one color marks the resonant center. A melodic phrase of another color occupies one corner of the score.
Do: The tuning fork remains as the tonal anchor. The melodic phrase is subjected to the four fugal transformations—original, inversion, retrograde, and retrograde-inversion—placing a copy in each quadrant around the fork.
Grid: Grid unchanged in size. Tuning fork persists. Four versions of the phrase populate all quadrants symmetrically. Silence (black) fills the rest.
"The referee stands at center court with arms crossed, and a play formation drawn up in one quarter is drilled until every quadrant of the court mirrors the same pattern."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A referee's crossed-arm signal of one color marks center court. A team formation of another color appears in one quadrant.
Do: The referee stays planted. The formation is replicated into all four quadrants of the court, reflected across both the midline and the sideline through the referee's position.
Grid: Court dimensions unchanged. Referee cross remains. Four reflected formations appear. Empty court stays black.
"The eye of the storm is marked by four calm spots in a diamond; a cloud bank spiraling in one quadrant spawns mirror-image fronts in every direction from the eye."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four calm-eye markers of one color sit at diagonal positions around a storm center. A cloud formation of another color occupies one quadrant.
Do: The eye markers hold steady. The cloud formation is reflected across both axes through the eye center, producing four symmetric weather fronts in all quadrants.
Grid: Grid size matches input. Eye markers unchanged. Four reflections of the cloud bank fill the quadrants. Clear sky remains black.
"A cornerstone is laid where four diagonal beams cross; a wing built in one quarter of the blueprint is replicated by the architect into every quarter for a perfectly symmetric palace."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Diagonal crossbeams of one color mark the building's central anchor point. An architectural wing of another color extends in one diagonal direction.
Do: The crossbeam cornerstone remains. The wing is reflected across both axes of the building plan, producing four identical wings radiating from the center.
Grid: Blueprint dimensions unchanged. Crossbeams persist. Four reflected wings appear. Empty ground stays black.
"Scouts plant crossed signal flags at the command post; a battalion positioned in one sector is ordered to deploy mirror formations in all four sectors of the battlefield."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Crossed signal flags of one color mark the command post. A battalion arrangement of another color occupies one sector.
Do: Signal flags remain as the fixed reference. The battalion is reflected across both axes through the command post, deploying identical formations into all four battlefield sectors.
Grid: Battlefield dimensions unchanged. Crossed flags persist. Four battalion reflections fill each sector. Empty terrain remains black.
"A spotlight marks center stage with an X of light; a dancer posed in one wing is reflected by four mirrors into every corner of the proscenium."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An X-shaped spotlight of one color illuminates center stage. A dancer's silhouette of another color poses in one diagonal wing.
Do: The spotlight stays fixed. The dancer's pose is reflected through both the horizontal and vertical axes of the stage, placing mirror-image silhouettes in all four corners.
Grid: Stage dimensions unchanged. Spotlight cross persists. Four dancer reflections appear. Dark stage remains black.
"A trellis of crossed stakes marks the garden's center; a flower bed planted in one corner is propagated by cuttings into every quadrant for a symmetric parterre."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Crossed garden stakes of one color form a trellis at the center. A flower bed of another color grows in one diagonal quadrant.
Do: The trellis remains rooted. The flower bed is propagated into all four quadrants by reflecting it across both axes through the trellis center.
Grid: Garden dimensions unchanged. Trellis cross persists. Four reflected flower beds bloom. Bare soil remains black.
See: The input grid consists of two equally-sized rectangular grids stacked vertically, separated by a single horizontal row of yellow (Y) cells that acts as a divider. The top grid contains red (R) cells and black (.) cells. The bottom grid contains blue (B) cells and black (.) cells.
Do: Remove the yellow divider row to isolate the top grid and bottom grid. Create an output grid of the same dimensions as either half. For each cell position, if the top grid has red (R) at that position OR the bottom grid has blue (B) at that position (or both), set the output cell to green (G). If neither grid has a colored cell at that position (both are black), set the output cell to black (.). This is a logical OR operation across the two grids.
Grid: The input grid has dimensions (2n+1) rows by m columns, where the middle row is entirely yellow. The output grid has dimensions n rows by m columns. In the examples, n=4 and m=5, producing a 9×5 input and a 4×5 output.
"Two armies join forces under a shared banner"
120b: k=1
See: A golden river runs across the middle of the battlefield, dividing two kingdoms. Above the river, the Red Army has pitched its tents on certain squares. Below the river, the Blue Army holds its own positions. The rest of the land lies empty and dark.
Do: The war is over — the golden river dries up, and the two kingdoms merge into one. Wherever either army had claimed ground, the united banner of green now flies. Only the squares that neither army ever touched remain barren darkness. Every soldier, red or blue, becomes green in the new alliance.
Grid: The golden river is a single row splitting the world in half. The united kingdom is exactly the size of one half. Every plot of land answers one question: did anyone fight here? If so, it blooms green.
We need to infer rule. Description: golden river is a single row splitting world in half. Input grid seems to have a row of Y's (yellow) representing river. Above river there are red R positions (army). Below river there are blue B positions. Output is a grid of size equal to one half (either above or below?) The description: "The united kingdom is exactly the size of one half." So output grid size equals half the input rows (excluding river?). In example 1, input grid dimensions? Let's count rows. Example 1 Input lines: ". . . . ." ". R R R ." ". R . . ." "R R R . R" "Y Y Y Y Y" "B B . . B" "B B . B B" "B . B . B" ". B . B B" That's 9 rows, each 5 columns. River row is row 5 (Y's). So above river rows = 4 rows, below river rows = 4 rows. Output grid is 4 rows, 5 columns. Indeed output given 4 rows. Output rows: "G G . . G" "G G G G G" "G G G . G" "G G G G G" So output corresponds to merging armies: any cell that had either red (above) or blue (below) becomes green. Cells that were empty (.) remain .? But output shows many G's where there were reds or blues. Let's verify mapping. Take position (row1,col1) input top half row1 col1 = '.' (black). Output row1 col1 = G. Wait that's not matching. Let's map coordinates: Output row1 corresponds to input row1? Actually output row1 corresponds to top half row1? Let's compare. Input top half rows (rows1-4): 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R Output rows: 1: G G . . G 2: G G G G G 3: G G G . G 4: G G G G G Now compare each cell: For cell (1,1) input '.' becomes G. So rule not just red->green. Maybe any cell that is not yellow (river) becomes green regardless of being empty? But output has some '.' still? Actually output row1 col3 is '.' (input row1 col3 '.'), output row1 col4 '.' (input '.'), others G. So not all become G. Let's see pattern: maybe output is union of red positions (above) and blue positions (below) projected onto same half? Since output size equals half, maybe we overlay the two halves onto each other (like combine). For each column, we take red from above and blue from below, and if either has a soldier, output green. If both empty, output '.'. But need to align rows: top half rows correspond to same rows as bottom half? Probably we overlay row i from top with row i from bottom (mirrored?) Let's test. Bottom half rows (rows6-9): 6: B B . . B 7: B B . B B 8: B . B . B 9: . B . B B Now overlay row1 (top) with row6 (bottom) maybe? Let's compute union: For each column, if either top row1 colj is R (or any non-empty) or bottom row6 colj is B (or any non-empty) then output G else '.'. Row1 top: . . . . . Row6 bottom: B B . . B Union: columns 1,2,5 have B => G. columns3,4 empty => . So output row1 would be G G . . G. That matches output row1! Good. Row2 top: . R R R . Row7 bottom: B B . B B Union: col1 top '.' bottom B => G. col2 top R bottom B => G. col3 top R bottom . => G. col4 top R bottom B => G. col5 top . bottom B => G. So all G => r ... [2305 chars truncated]
"Two strands of DNA recombine during crossing-over, and wherever either parent contributes a dominant allele, the offspring expresses the trait."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A double helix split at its midline — one strand stained crimson, the other indigo, with a golden centromere band holding them apart. Empty loci appear as silence in both strands.
Do: Dissolve the centromere. Overlay the two strands into a single daughter chromosome. Every locus where either parent donated genetic material awakens in verdant expression; only doubly-silent loci remain dormant.
Grid: The daughter chromosome has the same width and half the height of the original paired structure. Active loci glow green; silent ones stay dark.
"Two nebulae drift through the same region of space — wherever either cloud has matter, the overlap glows with new starlight."
120b: k=1
See: A patch of sky split by a golden ecliptic band. Above, a crimson nebula has dense pockets and voids. Below, a sapphire nebula has its own pattern of density and emptiness.
Do: The ecliptic fades and both nebulae occupy the same coordinates. Any region where at least one nebula has matter ignites green with nascent starlight. Only regions void in both remain dark space.
Grid: The star-forming region is half the original field. Luminous cells are green; voids are black.
We need to infer rule. The description: "patch of sky split by a golden ecliptic band. Above, a crimson nebula has dense pockets and voids. Below, a sapphire nebula has its own pattern of density and emptiness. What to do: The ecliptic fades and both nebulae occupy the same coordinates. Any region where at least one nebula has matter ignites green with nascent starlight. Only regions void in both remain dark space. Grid details: The star-forming region is half the original field. Luminous cells are green; voids are black." Interpretation: Input grid contains two halves separated by a "golden ecliptic band". Probably a row of Y (yellow) representing the band. Above that row is crimson nebula (R). Below is sapphire nebula (B). The task: overlay the two halves (above and below) onto each other, ignoring the band, and produce output where any cell that had either R or B becomes G (green). Cells that were empty (.) in both become . (black). Output grid is half the original height (since we overlay). So we take the top half (above the Y row) and bottom half (below Y row) and combine them cellwise (maybe aligning them directly). The Y row disappears. The resulting grid height is half of original (excluding the Y row). In example, input dimensions? Let's count. Example 1 Input lines: 1 ". . . . ." 2 ". R R R ." 3 ". R . . ." 4 "R R R . R" 5 "Y Y Y Y Y" 6 "B B . . B" 7 "B B . B B" 8 "B . B . B" 9 ". B . B B" That's 9 rows, 5 columns. Y row is row5. So top part rows1-4 (4 rows). Bottom part rows6-9 (4 rows). Output has 4 rows, 5 columns. Indeed output lines: 1 "G G . . G" 2 "G G G G G" 3 "G G G . G" 4 "G G G G G" So rule: For each column, combine top and bottom cells: if either top cell is R (or maybe any non-.) or bottom cell is B (or any non-.) then output G, else . . Let's verify with data. Let's map top rows (1-4) and bottom rows (6-9). Write them: Top: r1: . . . . . r2: . R R R . r3: . R . . . r4: R R R . R Bottom: r6: B B . . B r7: B B . B B r8: B . B . B r9: . B . B B Now overlay: For each position, if top is R or bottom is B => G else . . Let's compute. Column1: row1 top . bottom row6 B => G row2 top . bottom row7 B => G row3 top . bottom row8 B => G row4 top R bottom row9 . => G (since top R) Thus column1 all G matches output column1: G G G G (yes) Column2: top rows: . R R R bottom rows: B B . B Overlay: row1: . + B => G row2: R + B => G (both) row3: R + . => G row4: R + B => G Output column2: G G G G (yes) Column3: top rows: . R . R bottom rows: . . B . Overlay: row1: . + . => . (output row1 col3 is .) matches. row2: R + . => G (output row2 col3 G) row3: . + B => G (output row3 col3 G) row4: R + . => G (output row4 col3 G) Matches. Column4: top rows: . R . . bottom rows: . B . B Overlay: row1: . + . => . (output row1 col4 .) matches. row2: R + B => G (output row2 col4 G) row3: . + . => . (output row3 col4 .) matches. row4: . + B => G (output row4 col4 G) matches. Column5: top rows: . ... [1848 chars truncated]
"Two captains chart hazards on the same waters — their combined map warns of every reef either one spotted."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nautical chart torn along a gold latitude line. The upper half marks reefs in red from one captain's survey; the lower marks reefs in blue from another's. Uncharted waters are blank on both.
Do: Stitch the charts together along the gold line and project both surveys onto a single map. Every cell where either captain spotted a reef is marked green for danger. Only waters clear on both surveys remain unmarked.
Grid: The merged chart is the size of one half. Hazard cells are green; safe waters are blank.
"Two signal channels feed into an OR gate array — any cell receiving voltage from either channel outputs high."
120b: fail
See: A circuit board split by a golden bus bar. The upper channel carries red HIGH signals at certain nodes; the lower carries blue HIGH signals at others. Unpowered nodes sit at LOW on both sides.
Do: The bus bar routes both channels into a shared OR gate array. Each gate outputs green HIGH if either input is HIGH. Only nodes where both inputs are LOW remain off.
Grid: The output array matches one channel's dimensions. HIGH outputs are green; LOW nodes are black.
We need to infer rule. Description: circuit board split by golden bus bar. Upper channel carries red HIGH signals at certain nodes; lower carries blue HIGH signals at others. Unpowered nodes sit at LOW on both sides. Bus bar routes both channels into shared OR gate array. Each gate outputs green HIGH if either input is HIGH. Only nodes where both inputs are LOW remain off. Output array matches one channel's dimensions. HIGH outputs are green; LOW nodes are black. Interpretation: Input grid contains two halves separated by a row of Y (yellow) maybe representing golden bus bar? In example, input grid has 9 rows? Let's examine Example 1 input: lines: Row1: . . . . . Row2: . R R R . Row3: . R . . . Row4: R R R . R Row5: Y Y Y Y Y Row6: B B . . B Row7: B B . B B Row8: B . B . B Row9: . B . B B So 9 rows, 5 columns. Row5 is all Y (yellow) representing bus bar separating upper and lower halves. Upper half rows 1-4 contain red R and . (black). Lower half rows 6-9 contain blue B and . . Output grid is 4 rows? Output shown: G G . . G G G G G G G G G . G G G G G G That's 4 rows, 5 columns. So output matches dimensions of upper half (or lower half) - they said matches one channel's dimensions. So output corresponds to each column position across the bus? Probably each column corresponds to an OR of the red and blue signals at that column across the two halves? But need mapping: For each column, we need to consider the red pattern in upper half and blue pattern in lower half, maybe aligning rows? The bus bar routes both channels into shared OR gate array. Each gate outputs green if either input is HIGH. Only nodes where both inputs are LOW remain off (black). So output grid cells correspond to positions where there is a gate; maybe each gate corresponds to a column? But output is 4x5, same as upper half. So each cell corresponds to a position in upper half (row, col). The input for that gate is the red value at that position (if any) and the blue value at the corresponding position in lower half? But lower half has same number of rows (4) as upper half, rows 6-9 correspond to rows 1-4? Likely yes: row6 aligns with row1, row7 with row2, etc. Let's test. Create matrix of red presence (R) in upper half (rows1-4). Blue presence (B) in lower half (rows6-9). For each cell (i,j), output G if either red at (i,j) or blue at (i+5,j) is present (i.e., not black). Else output black (.) . Let's test with example. Upper rows: 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R Lower rows (aligned): row6 (align with row1): B B . . B row7 (align with row2): B B . B B row8 (align with row3): B . B . B row9 (align with row4): . B . B B Now compute OR: Row1: upper all ., lower B B . . B => output G where B present: columns1,2,5 => G G . . G matches output row1: G G . . G correct. Row2: upper . R R R . ; lower B B . B B. So any red or blue => columns1 (B),2 (R/B),3 (R),4 (R/B),5 (B). So all G => G G G G G matches output row2. Row3: upper . R . . . ; lower ... [2406 chars truncated]
"Two gods each breathe life into clay figures on their half of the world — wherever either deity's breath reached, the clay awakens."
120b: k=2
See: A creation tablet split by a golden river. Above, one god's breath animates certain clay figures, marked red. Below, another god's breath reaches other figures, marked blue. Unanimated clay is dark on both sides.
Do: The river dries and the two halves become one world. Every figure touched by at least one god's breath awakens in green vitality. Only figures ignored by both gods remain inert clay.
Grid: The unified world is the size of one half. Awakened figures are green; inert clay is black.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid appears to be split into two halves: top half maybe above river (some rows) and bottom half below river. In examples, input includes rows of Y (yellow) as a separator? Let's examine Example1 input. Example1 Input lines (I'll list): Row1: . . . . . Row2: . R R R . Row3: . R . . . Row4: R R R . R Row5: Y Y Y Y Y Row6: B B . . B Row7: B B . B B Row8: B . B . B Row9: . B . B B So total 9 rows, 5 columns. Row5 is all Y (yellow) representing the river? The description: "creation tablet split by a golden river". So Y row is the river separating top and bottom halves. The top half (rows 1-4) contains red R marks (breath of god1). The bottom half (rows 6-9) contains blue B marks (breath of god2). Black '.' are unanimated clay (dark on both sides). The output grid size is the size of one half (so 4 rows? Actually top half had 4 rows, bottom half also 4 rows). Output is 4 rows, 5 columns. Indeed output given has 4 rows. Output rows: 1: G G . . G 2: G G G G G 3: G G G . G 4: G G G G G So rule: For each cell position (column) across halves, if either top half cell is red (R) or bottom half cell is blue (B) (or both), then output cell becomes green G. If both are '.' (black), output becomes '.' (black). What about cases where both have marks? Could be both R and B? Not in examples maybe. Also Y row removed. Let's test with Example1: Let's compute for each column row index (1-4). For each position (i,j) where i is row in top half (1-4) and bottom half row (i+5?) Actually bottom half rows 6-9 correspond to same relative positions. Let's map. Top rows: 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R Bottom rows: 6: B B . . B 7: B B . B B 8: B . B . B 9: . B . B B Now compute output: For each column: Row1: top row1 all '.'; bottom row6: B B . . B. So positions where bottom has B => G. So row1 output: col1 G, col2 G, col3 ., col4 ., col5 G. matches output row1: G G . . G. Yes. Row2: top row2: . R R R . ; bottom row7: B B . B B. For each column: col1 top '.' bottom B => G. col2 top R bottom B => at least one => G. col3 top R bottom . => G. col4 top R bottom B => G. col5 top '.' bottom B => G. Output row2: G G G G G matches. Row3: top row3: . R . . . ; bottom row8: B . B . B. col1: bottom B => G. col2: top R => G. col3: bottom B => G. col4: both . => . . Output row3: G G G . G matches (col4 .). Good. Row4: top row4: R R R . R ; bottom row9: . B . B B. col1 top R => G. col2 top R or bottom B => G. col3 top R => G. col4 bottom B => G. col5 top R or bottom B => G. Output row4 all G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now Example2: Input rows count? Let's list. Rows: 1: R R R R R 2: . . . R . 3: . R . R R 4: R R R R R 5: Y Y Y Y Y 6: . B B . . 7: B B . B . 8: B B . . . 9: . . B B B Top half rows 1-4, bottom half rows 6-9. Compute output rows 1-4. Row1 top: R R R R R ; bottom row6: . B B . . => any R or B => all G. Output row1: G G G G G matches. Row2 top: . . . ... [2643 chars truncated]
"Two choreographers each mark floor positions for their dancers — the final performance uses every marked spot from either routine."
120b: k=4
See: A rehearsal floor divided by a golden tape line. Above, one choreographer marked positions in red; below, the other marked positions in blue. Unmarked tiles are open on both sides.
Do: Peel away the tape and overlay both choreographies. Every tile claimed by at least one routine is spotlit green for the combined performance. Only tiles unused by both stay dark.
Grid: The performance floor matches one choreographer's half. Active positions are green; unused tiles are black.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid divided by a golden tape line. Above line: red positions; below: blue positions. Unmarked tiles are open on both sides. Peel away tape and overlay both choreographies. Every tile claimed by at least one routine is spotlit green. Only tiles unused by both stay dark. Grid details: The performance floor matches one choreographer's half. Active positions are green; unused tiles are black. Interpretation: Input grid consists of two halves separated by a line of Y (yellow) maybe representing tape. The top half contains R (red) marks; bottom half contains B (blue) marks. The Y row is the dividing line. The output grid is only the half that matches one choreographer's half? Wait: "The performance floor matches one choreographer's half. Active positions are green; unused tiles are black." Means output grid corresponds to either top half or bottom half? Looking at examples: Input size appears 9 rows? Let's examine Example1 input: lines: Row1: . . . . . Row2: . R R R . Row3: . R . . . Row4: R R R . R Row5: Y Y Y Y Y Row6: B B . . B Row7: B B . B B Row8: B . B . B Row9: . B . B B So 9 rows, 5 columns. Row5 is Y line. Top 4 rows have R and . ; bottom 4 rows have B and . . Output is 4 rows, 5 columns (same as half). Output rows: G G . . G G G G G G G G G . G G G G G G So output corresponds to top half? Let's see: top half rows 1-4. Input top half had R positions. Output shows G where either top had R or bottom had B? Let's compute overlay: For each column, combine top and bottom halves (mirrored?) Wait bottom half rows correspond to rows 6-9. Need to map them onto top half positions? Perhaps the tape is removed and the bottom half is flipped vertically onto top half (like overlay). The description: "Peel away the tape and overlay both choreographies." So you take the bottom half and flip it up onto the top half (maybe mirror vertically). Then any tile claimed by at least one routine becomes green. So output is the combined overlay of top and bottom halves onto same coordinate system (top half). So we need to align bottom rows with top rows in order: row6 aligns with row4? Let's test. Example1: top rows (1-4). bottom rows (6-9). Let's list top R positions (R) coordinates (row, col) 1-indexed. Top: Row1: all . none. Row2: col2,3,4 are R. Row3: col2 is R. Row4: col1,2,3,5 are R. Bottom rows (6-9): Row6: B B . . B => cols1,2,5. Row7: B B . B B => cols1,2,4,5. Row8: B . B . B => cols1,3,5. Row9: . B . B B => cols2,4,5. Now overlay: need to map bottom rows onto top rows. Likely bottom row6 aligns with top row4 (closest to tape). Row7 aligns with top row3, row8 with top row2, row9 with top row1. That is reverse order (mirror vertically). Let's test: combine. Create a 4x5 grid initially from top R positions (R considered claimed). Then for each bottom row i (starting from row6) map to top row (5 - (i-5))? Actually tape row is row5. So distance from tape: bottom row6 distance 1 maps to top row4 distanc ... [5099 chars truncated]
"Two tectonic plates each carry mineral deposits — when they converge, every site bearing ore from either plate is exposed at the surface."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cross-section of crust split by a golden fault line. The upper plate has red mineral veins in some cells; the lower has blue veins in others. Barren rock is dark on both plates.
Do: The fault line closes as the plates collide and merge. Every cell where at least one plate carried minerals surfaces as green exposed ore. Only doubly-barren cells remain dark bedrock.
Grid: The merged formation is the size of one plate. Ore cells are green; barren cells are black.
"Two half-finished sauces are folded together — wherever either contributes flavor, the fusion tastes rich."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A kitchen counter divided by a strip of saffron garnish. Above it, dollops of paprika reduction sit in some compartments of a mold; below, pools of blueberry coulis fill other compartments. Some compartments on each side are empty.
Do: Remove the saffron divider and fold both sauces into a single mold of the same compartment layout. Any compartment that received flavor from either sauce turns into a mature green pesto. Only compartments that were empty in both halves remain clean.
Grid: The resulting mold has half the rows. Filled compartments are green; empty ones are bare.
"Two musicians each play partial melodies, and the audience hears every note that either one sounds."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A score split by a golden bar line into an upper staff written in red ink and a lower staff written in blue ink. Each staff has notes in some positions and rests in others.
Do: Collapse the two staves into one. Wherever either musician played a note, the combined performance rings out in a new harmonic color. Only positions where both players rested remain silent.
Grid: The merged staff has the dimensions of one half. Sounded notes appear in green; rests remain blank.
"Two relay teams cover different legs of the course — the ground touched by either team's runners gets marked as contested territory."
120b: k=1
See: A playing field bisected by a bright yellow midfield line. The northern half shows where the red team's players have stepped; the southern half shows the blue team's footprints. Untouched grass is bare on both sides.
Do: Erase the midfield line and overlay both halves onto a single field map. Any patch trodden by at least one team turns vivid green. Only patches untouched by both remain bare.
Grid: The combined field map is half the original height. Green marks contested ground; bare patches are untouched.
We need to infer rule. Input grid appears to have top half (north) with red R and maybe other colors, bottom half with blue B, and a middle line of Y (yellow) separating. Output is half height (i.e., combine halves). In example, input size? Let's count rows. Example 1 Input lines: 1 ". . . . ." 2 ". R R R ." 3 ". R . . ." 4 "R R R . R" 5 "Y Y Y Y Y" 6 "B B . . B" 7 "B B . B B" 8 "B . B . B" 9 ". B . B B" That's 9 rows, 5 columns. Middle line row5 is Y's. So north half rows 1-4, south half rows 6-9. Output has 4 rows (half height) and 5 columns. Output rows: 1 "G G . . G" 2 "G G G G G" 3 "G G G . G" 4 "G G G G G" So rule: For each column, combine north and south halves: if either north cell (above Y) or south cell (below Y) is non-black (i.e., not '.'), then output G (green). If both are '.' (black), output '.'? Let's verify with example. Let's map north half (rows1-4) and south half (rows6-9). We'll overlay: For each position (i,j) where i from 1..4 (north) and i' = i+5 (south) (since Y row is row5). Let's list. I'll create arrays. North rows: 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R South rows (rows6-9): 6: B B . . B 7: B B . B B 8: B . B . B 9: . B . B B Now compute output: For each column j. Row1 output corresponds to north row1 vs south row6? Actually output row1 corresponds to north row1? In example output row1: "G G . . G". Let's compute: north row1 all '.'; south row6 has B B . . B. So positions where south has B (non-.) become G. Indeed output row1 has G G . . G matches. So rule: output cell = G if either north cell is R (red) or south cell is B (blue). If both are '.' then '.'. Check row2: north row2 ". R R R .", south row7 "B B . B B". Combine: positions: col1: north '.' south B => G (output G) col2: north R, south B => G (output G) col3: north R, south . => G (output G) col4: north R, south B => G (output G) col5: north '.' south B => G (output G) Matches output row2 all G. Row3: north row3 ". R . . .", south row8 "B . B . B". Combine: c1: . + B => G (output G) c2: R + . => G (output G) c3: . + B => G (output G) c4: . + . => . (output .) matches output row3 col4 '.'. c5: . + B => G (output G). Output row3 "G G G . G". Yes. Row4: north row4 "R R R . R", south row9 ". B . B B". Combine: c1: R + . => G c2: R + B => G c3: R + . => G c4: . + B => G c5: R + B => G Output row4 all G. Yes. Thus rule confirmed. Now apply to test input. Test Input rows: Let's list rows: 1 ". R R R R" 2 ". . . R ." 3 ". R . . ." 4 "R R R . R" 5 "Y Y Y Y Y" 6 ". . B . ." 7 ". . . . B" 8 "B . . B B" 9 ". . . . B" Check dimensions: 9 rows, 5 columns. North rows 1-4, South rows 6-9. North rows: 1: . R R R R 2: . . . R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R South rows: 6: . . B . . 7: . . . . B 8: B . . B B 9: . . . . B Now compute output rows 1-4. Row1 output = combine north row1 with south row6. Row1 north: . R R R R Row1 south: . . B . . For each column: c1: north '.' south '.' => both '.' = ... [816 chars truncated]
"A warm front and a cold front converge — wherever either system carries moisture, rain falls on the land below."
120b: k=2
See: A sky divided by a golden jet stream. Above it, a warm front's moisture pockets glow red; below, a cold front's moisture pockets shimmer blue. Dry pockets on both sides are clear.
Do: The jet stream dissolves as the fronts merge. Project their combined moisture onto a single weather map. Wherever either front carried moisture, green rainfall marks the map. Only doubly-dry zones stay clear.
Grid: The weather map is the size of one front. Rainfall cells are green; dry cells are blank.
We need to infer rule. Input appears to be two halves? In examples, input grid seems larger than output. Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions? Let's count rows: Provided lines: ". . . . ." ". R R R ." ". R . . ." "R R R . R" "Y Y Y Y Y" "B B . . B" "B B . B B" "B . B . B" ". B . B B" That's 9 rows, each 5 columns. Output grid lines: "G G . . G" "G G G G G" "G G G . G" "G G G G G" That's 4 rows, 5 columns. So output height = 4, width =5 same as top part? The description: "weather map is the size of one front." The input seems to have two fronts separated by a line of Y (yellow) representing jet stream? Indeed row of Y's is row5. Above that rows1-4 are top front (warm front) with red moisture pockets (R) and dry (.) maybe. Below rows6-9 are bottom front (cold front) with blue moisture pockets (B) and dry. Goal: combine moisture: wherever either front had moisture (R or B) becomes green G. Only doubly-dry zones stay clear (i.e., both sides dry). Output size equals one front (i.e., rows above jet stream). So we take rows above Y (first 4 rows) as output grid, but fill with G where either top front had R or bottom front had B at same column position? Need to align columns same, rows correspond? Probably we overlay the two fronts: top front rows correspond to bottom front rows? But they have same number of rows (4). So we pair row1 with row6, row2 with row7, row3 with row8, row4 with row9. Let's test. Example1 top rows (1-4): 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R Bottom rows (6-9): 6: B B . . B 7: B B . B B 8: B . B . B 9: . B . B B Now compute combined: For each cell, if top has R or bottom has B => G else . (dry). Let's compute. Row1 top all . ; bottom row6: B B . . B => any B => G at those columns. So row1 output should be G G . . G. Indeed output row1: G G . . G matches. Row2 top: . R R R . ; bottom row7: B B . B B. For each column: col1: top . bottom B => G col2: top R bottom B => both moisture => G col3: top R bottom . => G col4: top R bottom B => G col5: top . bottom B => G Thus row2 output: G G G G G matches. Row3 top: . R . . . ; bottom row8: B . B . B col1: . + B => G col2: R + . => G col3: . + B => G col4: . + . => . (both dry) => output . matches? Output row3: G G G . G . Wait output row3: "G G G . G". Yes col4 . matches. col5: . + B => G. So row3 matches. Row4 top: R R R . R ; bottom row9: . B . B B col1: R + . => G col2: R + B => G col3: R + . => G col4: . + B => G col5: R + B => G Thus row4 all G. Output row4: G G G G G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Example2: Let's verify. Input rows count? Provided lines: "R R R R R" ". . . R ." ". R . R R" "R R R R R" "Y Y Y Y Y" ". B B . ." "B B . B ." "B B . . ." ". . B B B" That's 9 rows, 5 columns. Top rows 1-4, bottom rows 6-9. Top rows: 1: R R R R R 2: . . . R . 3: . R . R R 4: R R R R R Bottom rows: 6: . B B . . 7: B B . B . 8: B B . . . 9: . . B B B Now compute combined. Row1: top all R, ... [2024 chars truncated]
"Two transparent blueprints are stacked on a light table — wherever either blueprint has a wall, the combined plan shows structure."
120b: k=1
See: Two architectural floor plans separated by a golden binding strip. The upper plan draws walls in red drafting ink; the lower plan draws walls in blue. Open spaces in each plan are empty.
Do: Remove the binding and overlay the plans on the light table. Any cell where either plan specifies a wall becomes solid green in the composite. Only spaces open in both plans remain empty.
Grid: The composite plan has the footprint of one floor. Solid walls are green; open spaces are unmarked.
We need to infer rule. Description: two floor plans separated by a golden binding strip. Upper plan draws walls in red; lower plan draws walls in blue. Open spaces empty. Remove binding and overlay; any cell where either plan specifies a wall becomes solid green in composite. Only spaces open in both plans remain empty. Thus input grid consists of two halves separated by a row of Y (yellow) maybe representing binding strip? In example, input grid 9 rows? Let's examine Example 1. Input lines (as shown): . . . . . . R R R . . R . . . R R R . R Y Y Y Y Y B B . . B B B . B B B . B . B . B . B B So first 4 rows (0-3) are upper plan (red walls). Row 4 is Y row (binding). Rows 5-8 are lower plan (blue walls). Output is 4 rows (same as one floor footprint) with G and .? Output given: G G . . G G G G G G G G G . G G G G G G That's 4 rows, 5 columns. So output corresponds to overlay of upper and lower plans, ignoring binding row. For each column, if either upper (R) or lower (B) has a wall (non-.) then output G, else . (empty). Let's verify. Take column wise: Let's reconstruct matrices. Upper (rows0-3): r0: . . . . . r1: . R R R . r2: . R . . . r3: R R R . R Lower (rows5-8): r5: B B . . B r6: B B . B B r7: B . B . B r8: . B . B B Now overlay: For each cell, if either has non-., output G else . . Let's compute. Create 4x5 grid. Row0: upper row0 all . ; lower row5? Wait mapping: row0 of output corresponds to upper row0? Actually lower rows correspond same positions. So row0 overlay upper row0 with lower row5? Yes because same column positions. So row0: upper . . . . . ; lower row5 B B . . B. So any B => G. So row0 becomes G G . . G. matches output row0. Row1: upper row1 . R R R . ; lower row6 B B . B B. Any non-., so columns: col0 . vs B => G. col1 R vs B => G. col2 R vs . => G. col3 R vs B => G. col4 . vs B => G. So row1 all G. matches. Row2: upper row2 . R . . . ; lower row7 B . B . B. So col0 . vs B => G. col1 R vs . => G. col2 . vs B => G. col3 . vs . => . (both .) => . . col4 . vs B => G. Output row2: G G G . G matches. Row3: upper row3 R R R . R ; lower row8 . B . B B. Any non-., all columns have at least one non-. So all G. Output row3 all G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input: Given: . R R R R . . . R . . R . . . R R R . R Y Y Y Y Y . . B . . . . . . B B . . B B . . . . B We have 9 rows, 5 columns. Upper rows 0-3, binding row 4, lower rows 5-8. Upper rows: 0: . R R R R 1: . . . R . 2: . R . . . 3: R R R . R Lower rows: 5: . . B . . 6: . . . . B 7: B . . B B 8: . . . . B Now overlay produce 4 rows output. Compute each cell. I'll index columns 0-4. Row0: upper row0 vs lower row5. col0: upper '.' lower '.' => . (both empty) col1: upper 'R' lower '.' => G col2: upper 'R' lower 'B' => G col3: upper 'R' lower '.' => G col4: upper 'R' lower '.' => G Thus row0: . G G G G Row1: upper row1 vs lower row6. col0: '.' vs '.' => . col1: '.' vs '.' => . col2: '.' vs '.' => ... [525 chars truncated]
"Two scout reports are combined into a single intelligence map — any position flagged by either scout is marked as occupied."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A war table split by a gold command ribbon. Above, one scout's report marks enemy positions in red. Below, the other scout's report marks positions in blue. Unobserved cells are blank in both.
Do: Remove the ribbon and merge both intelligence reports onto one tactical map. Every cell flagged by at least one scout turns green for 'confirmed presence.' Only cells missed by both remain unmarked.
Grid: The tactical map matches one scout report's dimensions. Occupied cells are green; unconfirmed cells are blank.
"Two spotlight operators each illuminate parts of the stage — the audience sees everywhere that either beam falls."
120b: k=4
See: A stage divided by a golden curtain. Above, one operator's red spots light certain tiles; below, another's blue spots light others. Unlit tiles are dark on both sides.
Do: Raise the curtain and merge both lighting plots into a single stage map. Every tile illuminated by at least one operator glows green under combined light. Only tiles in both operators' shadows stay dark.
Grid: The combined plot covers one half of the original stage. Lit tiles are green; dark tiles are black.
We need to infer rule. From description: stage divided by golden curtain: top half operator red spots, bottom half blue spots. Input grid seems to have top part rows with R and . and Y row? Actually examples show input grid of 9 rows? Let's examine Example1 input: lines: . . . . . . R R R . . R . . . R R R . R Y Y Y Y Y B B . . B B B . B B B . B . B . B . B B That's 9 rows, 5 columns. The middle row (row5) is Y Y Y Y Y (yellow). That likely is the curtain dividing top and bottom halves. Top 4 rows are red operator (R and .). Bottom 4 rows are blue operator (B and .). The Y row is the curtain. Output is 4 rows, 5 columns (half of original). Output rows correspond to combined map? Output shows green where either red or blue lit tile? Let's test. We need to map top and bottom halves onto same coordinate system? Probably overlay: For each column, combine red pattern (top) and blue pattern (bottom) by aligning them vertically? But they are separate halves; maybe we "raise curtain" meaning we overlay the two halves onto each other, aligning them such that the top half is reflected? Actually description: "The combined plot covers one half of the original stage." So output size equals half height (excluding curtain). So we need to merge the two halves into one half-height grid. Likely we overlay the top half onto bottom half (or vice versa) by aligning rows: top row (just above curtain) corresponds to bottom row (just below curtain) after merging? Let's test with Example1. Top half (rows1-4): 1: . . . . . 2: . R R R . 3: . R . . . 4: R R R . R Bottom half (rows6-9): 6: B B . . B 7: B B . B B 8: B . B . B 9: . B . B B Now output (4 rows): 1: G G . . G 2: G G G G G 3: G G G . G 4: G G G G G Let's compute overlay: For each column, if either top cell is R (lit) or bottom cell is B (lit) then output G, else .? Let's test row1 output corresponds to which rows? Possibly combine row1 of top with row6 of bottom? Let's pair: top row1 (all .) with bottom row6 (B B . . B) => combine => positions with B become G, else . => would be G G . . G matches output row1! Yes row1 output = G G . . G matches that. Row2 output: combine top row2 (. R R R .) with bottom row7 (B B . B B) => combine: positions: col1 . + B => G; col2 R + B => both lit => G; col3 R + . => G; col4 R + B => G; col5 . + B => G => G G G G G matches output row2. Row3 output: combine top row3 (. R . . .) with bottom row8 (B . B . B) => col1 .+B=G; col2 R+.=G; col3 .+B=G; col4 .+.=.; col5 .+B=G => G G G . G matches output row3. Row4 output: combine top row4 (R R R . R) with bottom row9 (. B . B B) => col1 R+.=G; col2 R+B=G; col3 R+.=G; col4 .+B=G; col5 R+B=G => G G G G G matches output row4. Thus rule: For each column, combine corresponding rows from top half (above curtain) and bottom half (below curtain) by logical OR: if either cell is colored (R in top, B in bottom) then output G, else . (black). The colors are specific: top uses R (red) as lit, bo ... [3003 chars truncated]
"Two gardeners each plant seeds in different plots of the same bed — wherever either planted, something grows."
120b: k=2
See: A raised bed divided by a golden edging strip. In the upper plot, one gardener planted red seed markers; in the lower, the other planted blue markers. Some cells in each plot were left fallow.
Do: Remove the edging and overlay both planting patterns into one bed. Every cell where at least one gardener sowed seed sprouts green. Only doubly-fallow cells remain bare soil.
Grid: The combined bed is the size of one plot. Sprouted cells are green; bare cells are dark.
We need to understand puzzle. Input appears to be two plots stacked? In examples, input grid seems to have 9 rows? Let's examine Example1 input: lines: ". . . . ." ". R R R ." ". R . . ." "R R R . R" "Y Y Y Y Y" "B B . . B" "B B . B B" "B . B . B" ". B . B B" That's 9 rows, 5 columns. Output is 4 rows, 5 columns? Actually output lines: "G G . . G" "G G G G G" "G G G . G" "G G G G G" That's 4 rows, 5 columns. So combined bed size is size of one plot (upper plot). Upper plot likely first 4 rows? Lower plot maybe rows 6-9? Row5 is Y Y Y Y Y which is golden edging strip separating plots. So top plot rows 1-4, bottom plot rows 6-9. The Y row is separator. In top plot, red markers (R) represent seeds of gardener1. Some cells left fallow (.) maybe black? In bottom plot, blue markers (B) represent other gardener. So rule: overlay top and bottom patterns onto same size grid (size of one plot). For each cell, if at least one gardener sowed seed (i.e., either R in top or B in bottom at that position), output G (green). If both are fallow (i.e., top '.' and bottom '.'), output .? But description says "Only doubly-fallow cells remain bare soil." Bare soil is dark (maybe .). In output examples, we see '.' appear where both are '.'? Let's verify. Example1 top 4x5 grid: Row1: . . . . . Row2: . R R R . Row3: . R . . . Row4: R R R . R Bottom 4x5 grid rows6-9: Row6: B B . . B Row7: B B . B B Row8: B . B . B Row9: . B . B B Now overlay: For each position, if top has R or bottom has B => G, else . (both .). Let's compute. Create matrix positions (col1-5). Row1 top: all . ; bottom row6: B B . . B => So row1 output: col1 top . bottom B => G; col2 . + B => G; col3 . + . => . ; col4 . + . => . ; col5 . + B => G. Output row1: G G . . G matches. Row2 top: . R R R . ; bottom row7: B B . B B. For each col: c1: . + B => G c2: R + B => at least one => G c3: R + . => G c4: R + B => G c5: . + B => G => G G G G G matches output row2. Row3 top: . R . . . ; bottom row8: B . B . B c1: .+B => G c2: R+. => G c3: .+B => G c4: .+. => .? Wait bottom row8 col4 is . . top . => both . => . . Output row3 col4 is . (they have G G G . G). Yes. c5: .+B => G. So row3: G G G . G matches. Row4 top: R R R . R ; bottom row9: . B . B B c1: R+. => G c2: R+B => G c3: R+. => G c4: .+B => G c5: R+B => G => G G G G G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now Example2: Input top rows 1-4, bottom rows 6-9, Y row 5. Let's test quickly to ensure same. Top rows: 1: R R R R R 2: . . . R . 3: . R . R R 4: R R R R R Bottom rows: 6: . B B . . 7: B B . B . 8: B B . . . 9: . . B B B Overlay produce output given: Let's test row1: top all R, bottom row6 . B B . . => any R => G all columns => G G G G G matches. Row2: top . . . R . ; bottom row7 B B . B . => col1 .+B=G, col2 .+B=G, col3 .+.=., col4 R+B=G, col5 .+.=.; output row2: G G . G . matches. Row3: top . R . R R ; bottom row8 B B . . . => col1 .+B=G, col2 R ... [1409 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains three elements: (1) a black (.) background, (2) a solid rectangular red (R) wall along one edge of the grid (it can be along the bottom, right, left, or top — occupying full rows or full columns), and (3) exactly two or three azure (A) cells arranged in a diagonal line. The A cells define a trajectory direction — moving from the first A to the last A gives a diagonal direction vector (e.g., down-right, down-left, up-right, or up-left). The A diagonal is positioned in the open black region, with the red wall nearby on one side.
Do: 1. Identify the diagonal direction of the A cells by looking at consecutive A positions. Compute the direction vector (row_delta, col_delta), each being +1 or -1. 2. Identify the red wall: it is a solid rectangular block of R cells occupying entire rows or columns along one edge of the grid. Determine which edge it lies on (top, bottom, left, or right). 3. Starting from the last A cell in the direction of travel, extend the trajectory one step at a time in the same diagonal direction, placing a green (G) cell at each new position. Continue until the next step would enter the red wall region or exit the grid. 4. When the trajectory reaches the red wall, reflect the ball: reverse the component of the direction vector that is perpendicular to the wall. If the wall is horizontal (top or bottom edge), negate the row_delta; if the wall is vertical (left or right edge), negate the col_delta. 5. Continue placing G cells in the new reflected direction, one step at a time, until the trajectory exits the grid boundary. 6. Leave all original A cells and R cells unchanged. Only add G cells on previously black cells.
Grid: The grid is rectangular (not necessarily square), typically around 12x12. The background is black (.). The red wall is a contiguous rectangular block spanning the full width or full height of the grid along one edge, and can be multiple rows or columns thick. The A cells and G cells occupy the open (non-red) portion of the grid. The output grid has the same dimensions as the input.
"A ball bounces off a wall like light reflecting off a mirror."
120b: k=3
See: A black night sky stretches across the grid. Along one edge, a solid red cliff face stands immovable — a wall of crimson stone. Out in the open darkness, a few azure sparks trace a diagonal path, like a ball mid-flight, hurtling toward the cliff.
Do: The azure sparks show where the ball has already been — its past trajectory frozen in place. Follow the ball's momentum forward, leaving a green phosphorescent trail as it streaks through the darkness. When the ball reaches the red cliff, it bounces — ricocheting like a billiard ball off a cushion, its angle of incidence equal to its angle of reflection. The green trail continues in the new direction until the ball flies off into the void beyond the grid's edge. The cliff and the original sparks remain untouched.
Grid: The arena is a rectangular court draped in black. The red cliff is a thick, immovable barrier running along one entire side. The azure marks and the green trail live only in the open darkness beyond the cliff. The court's dimensions stay fixed.
We need to infer rule. From description: black background, red cliff along one side (full side). Azure (A) marks past trajectory of ball. Need to extend ball's path forward, leaving green (G) trail, bounce off red wall with equal angle, continue until off grid. The red wall and original A remain unchanged. Thus we need to detect direction of ball from A positions (a line of A's). They represent previous positions. Determine direction vector (dx, dy) from consecutive A's. Then extend forward from last A (the tip) in same direction, marking G until hitting red wall (R). At wall, reflect direction (dx, dy) -> reflect across wall normal. Since wall is along one side (full side). Which side? In examples, red wall is at bottom rows (example1 rows 10-12). In example1, A's are diagonal from (row3,col1) etc? Let's map coordinates: Example1 input grid 12 rows, 12 columns. Red rows at rows 10-12 all columns. A's at (row3,col1), (row4,col2), (row5,col3). That's a diagonal down-right. So direction vector (1,1). The ball moves forward from last A at (5,3) direction (1,1) towards red wall at bottom. It will hit red wall at row10? Let's compute: positions: (6,4) G, (7,5) G, (8,6) G, (9,7) G, (10,8) would be red wall cell (since row10 all R). At that point bounce. Reflection off horizontal wall (bottom) would invert dy (vertical component) while keep dx same? Actually wall is horizontal line (row10). Incidence angle equal reflection: direction (1,1) hitting horizontal wall => reflect vertical component: (1,-1). So after bounce, continue with (1,-1) moving up-right. Starting from cell just before wall? In output, we see G's placed at (6,4), (7,5), (8,6), (9,7) as above, and also after bounce they have G at (9,8)? Wait output shows G at (9,8?) Let's examine output rows: Row6 (index6) has G at col4? Actually row6 line: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." That's row6 (original row6). G at col4 and col10? Wait there are two G's per row after bounce? Let's map. Let's write coordinates (row, col) 1-indexed. Output rows: Row1 all . Row2 all . Row3 A at col1 unchanged. Row4 A at col2, G at col4? Actually row4: ". A . . . . . . . . G". So G at col12? Wait row4 length 12. Row4 shows G at last column (col12). That's after bounce maybe. Row5: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." G at col11. Row6: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." G at col4 and col10. Row7: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col5 and col9. Row8: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col6 and col8. Row9: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col7. Rows10-12 red. Observations: The path after bounce seems to go up-left? Actually after hitting bottom, direction becomes ( -1, 1 )? Let's compute: Starting from last A at (5,3). Continue (1,1): (6,4) G, (7,5) G, (8,6) G, (9,7) G, then bounce at row10 (R). After bounce, direction becomes (-1,1) (up-right). So next positions: (9,8) G, (8,9) G, (7,10) G, (6,11) G, (5,12) G, then off grid. Indeed output shows G at (9,8) row9 col8? Row9 has G at col7 only, not col8. Wait row9 line: ". . . . . . G . . . ... [10391 chars truncated]
"A nerve impulse races along an axon until it hits a membrane barrier, then rebounds along a mirror-image pathway."
120b: k=1
See: A cell body (azure diagonal) sends a signal across empty cytoplasm toward a thick membrane wall (red block). The background is intracellular fluid (black).
Do: The signal extends from the last azure cell along its trajectory, leaving a neurotransmitter trail (green). When it reaches the membrane, the signal reflects off the barrier and continues in the complementary direction until it exits the cell.
Grid: Azure cells and red cells remain. Green cells appear tracing the signal's path through previously empty (black) space.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure diagonal A from (row2? Let's index 0). Input shows A at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2). That's a diagonal of length 3 starting at row2 col0. Rest black. Bottom rows rows9-11 are red block full rows of R across all columns (12 columns). Output: same azure cells unchanged. Green cells appear forming a path from the last azure cell (row4 col2) extending down-right? Let's see output green positions: Provided output grid shows G at (3,11?) Wait need map. Let's write coordinates (row, col). Output rows 0-8 have some G. Row3 (0-index) has G at column 11? Actually row3 line: ". A . . . . . . . . G". That's row3 (index3) originally had A at col1? Wait input row3 had ". A . . . . . . . . .". So output row3 has same A at col1 and a G at last column (col11). Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." So G at col10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." So G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. So pattern: Starting from last azure at (4,2). The signal extends along its trajectory: azure diagonal direction is down-right (south-east). So from (4,2) continue moving down-right until hitting red block? But red block is rows9-11 all columns. The path of green appears to go down-right, reflect off red block, and continue in complementary direction (down-left?) until exits grid. Let's trace: Starting point after last azure (4,2). Next step down-right: (5,3) -> G appears at (5,3) yes. Next (6,4) -> G at (6,4) yes. Next (7,5) -> G at (7,5) yes. Next (8,6) -> G at (8,6) yes. Next (9,7) would be in red block row9 col7 which is R. So reflect at barrier: reflect direction? Complementary direction maybe down-left (south-west). So after hitting red at (9,7) we reflect and continue moving down-left from the cell before barrier? Actually they placed G at (8,6) then next G at (7,7?) Wait we see G at (7,7) yes row7 col7. That's after reflection, moving up? Let's see: After hitting barrier at row9, they reflect and go up? Actually they continue in complementary direction until exits cell. Complementary direction maybe up-right? Let's examine sequence after (8,6). Next G appears at (7,7) which is up-right from (8,6). That's direction north-east. Then (6,8) G at row6 col8 (north-east). Then (5,9) G at row5 col9 (north-east). Then (4,10) G at row4 col10 (north-east). Then (3,11) G at row3 col11 (north-east). Then next would be (2,12) out of grid, exit. So indeed after hitting red barrier at row9 (the red block), the signal reflects and goes in opposite vertical direction (north) while maintaining horizontal direction? Actually original direction was down-right (dx=+1, dy=+1). Upon hitting barrier (which is a horizontal wall of red rows), the vertical component flips sign, horizontal stays same, resulting in up-right (dx=-1, dy=+1). That matches. Thus rule: Find the las ... [5518 chars truncated]
"A comet streaks diagonally through the void, grazes the edge of a dense nebula, and slingshots away on a mirrored course."
120b: k=1
See: A short cometary trail (azure diagonal) crosses empty space (black) toward a dense nebula cloud (red block along one edge).
Do: Extend the comet's path from its leading point, leaving a plasma tail (green). When the comet reaches the nebula's edge, its trajectory component perpendicular to the nebula boundary reverses, and it continues trailing plasma until it exits the field of view.
Grid: Original comet trail (azure) and nebula (red) are fixed. Plasma tail (green) marks the full reflected trajectory.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure diagonal A from (row2? Let's index 0). Provided input: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . A . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . A . . . . . . . . . Rows5-8 all dots. Rows9-11: R repeated across entire row (12 columns). So red block at bottom three rows. Output: same azure diagonal unchanged. Then green G appears forming a reflected diagonal? Let's map coordinates. Output rows 0-2 same as input. Row3: ". A . . . . . . . . . G" So G at column 11? Actually columns 0-11. Row3 has A at col1, G at col11. Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." G at col10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. Rows9-11 unchanged red rows. So pattern: Starting from the tip of azure diagonal? The azure diagonal goes from (2,0), (3,1), (4,2). That's three cells. The "leading point" likely the last azure cell (row4,col2). Extend its path beyond that direction (down-right?) Actually direction of diagonal is down-right (increase row, increase col). Starting at (2,0) to (4,2). So direction vector (1,1). Extend from leading point (row4,col2) further: (5,3), (6,4), (7,5), (8,6), (9,7), (10,8), (11,9). But there is red block occupying rows9-11 all columns. The rule: when hitting red block, reflect perpendicular component (i.e., bounce off the edge). The red block is a solid rectangle covering bottom rows. The boundary is horizontal (top of red block). The trajectory component perpendicular to boundary (vertical) reverses, so after hitting row9 (first red row) at column7, the path reflects upward while continuing horizontal component? Actually original direction (1,1). Perpendicular to horizontal boundary is vertical component, so vertical direction flips sign, horizontal stays same. So after bounce, direction becomes (-1,1). So path goes up-right: from (9,7) bounce? But output shows G at (5,3) etc before hitting red? Let's list G positions: (5,3) matches (row5,col3) which is (row4+1, col2+1) = (5,3) correct. (6,4) (7,5) (8,6) are before hitting red. Then after bounce, we expect positions (9,7) would be inside red block, but they are not green (since red stays). The bounce occurs at the edge of red block, i.e., at row8? Actually the comet reaches the nebula's edge (the red block's top edge) at row8? The top of red block is row9 (0-index). The comet reaches row8 col6 (just before red). Then next step would be row9 col7 which is red, so bounce occurs at row8 col6? The output shows G at row8 col6 (the last before red). Then after bounce, direction becomes (-1,1) so next positions: (7,7) (6,8) (5,9) (4,10) (3,11) (2,12 out). Indeed output has G at (7,7) row7 col7, (6,8) row6 col8, (5,9) row5 col9, (4,10) row4 col10, (3,11) row3 col11. Yes matches. So rule: draw line from last ... [5521 chars truncated]
"A current flows diagonally across open water, strikes a sea wall, and the undertow reverses its crosswise drift."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short diagonal current (azure) flows across open water (black) toward a solid seawall or jetty (red block along one edge).
Do: Trace the current's path forward from its leading edge, marking the flow (green). Upon hitting the seawall, the current deflects — its component perpendicular to the wall reverses — and continues flowing until it passes beyond the charted waters.
Grid: Original current markers (azure) and seawall (red) stay. Flow markers (green) trace the current and its deflection.
"A signal propagates diagonally along a circuit trace, hits a grounded plane, and reflects back along a complementary path."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short diagonal signal trace (azure) crosses an empty circuit board (black) toward a solid ground plane (red block along one edge).
Do: Propagate the signal from the trace's end, marking each step (green). When it reaches the ground plane, the signal reflects — impedance mismatch reverses the perpendicular component — and continues until it leaves the board.
Grid: Original trace (azure) and ground plane (red) remain. Signal propagation (green) marks the full reflected path.
"A thunderbolt is hurled diagonally by a god, strikes an enchanted barrier, and is cast back along a fated path."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short diagonal thunderbolt (azure) flies across the void (black) toward an enchanted barrier (red block along one edge).
Do: Extend the thunderbolt's flight from its tip, leaving scorch marks (green). Upon striking the barrier, the bolt rebounds symmetrically — its angle mirrors against the barrier's face — and continues scorching until it vanishes beyond the realm.
Grid: The thrown bolt (azure) and enchanted barrier (red) persist. Scorch marks (green) trace the bolt's full flight and rebound.
"A dancer glides diagonally across the floor, reaches the edge of the stage, and pirouettes into a mirrored path."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short diagonal sequence of footsteps (azure) crosses an empty dance floor (black) toward a solid stage edge (red block along one side).
Do: Continue the dancer's path from the last step, leaving footprints (green). At the stage edge the dancer pivots — reversing the direction perpendicular to the edge while maintaining the parallel component — and glides until exiting the floor.
Grid: Original footsteps (azure) and stage edge (red) remain. New footprints (green) trace the glide and its pivot.
"A seismic wave propagates diagonally through bedrock, hits a dense magma intrusion, and refracts back at a symmetric angle."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short diagonal wavefront (azure) travels through stable rock (black) toward a solid magma body (red block along one edge).
Do: Extend the wavefront from its leading edge, marking its passage (green). When it meets the magma body, the wave reflects — its component perpendicular to the magma face reverses — and continues propagating until it exits the geological survey area.
Grid: Initial wavefront (azure) and magma body (red) stay. Seismic trace (green) marks the wave's full reflected path.
"A drizzle of sauce slides across a hot skillet until it sizzles against the rim, then skids back at an angle."
120b: fail
See: A tilted drizzle of glaze (azure diagonal) slides across an empty pan surface (black) toward a thick metal rim (red block along one edge).
Do: Continue the drizzle's angled path from its leading edge, leaving a caramelized trail (green). When it hits the rim, the drizzle deflects and streaks away at the complementary angle until it slides off the pan.
Grid: The original glaze (azure) and rim (red) stay. The caramelized trail (green) fills the path through empty pan surface.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure A diagonal from (row2? Let's index 0). Input shows A at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2). That's a diagonal of length 3 starting near top left moving down-right. Bottom rows (9-11) are red R rows across entire row (full width). So red block along bottom edge (horizontal). Output: same A positions unchanged. Green G appears forming a diagonal path extending from the leading edge of the azure diagonal? Let's see output G positions: At (3,11?) Wait output row3 (0-index row3) has G at column 11? Actually row3 output: ". A . . . . . . . . G". That's row index 3 (fourth row). Input row3 had A at col1, rest empty. Output adds G at far right column 11. Row4 output: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." Wait row4 output: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." That's 12 columns, G at column 10? Let's count: columns 0-11. Row4: positions: 0 '.';1 '.';2 'A';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 'G';11 '.' . So G at col10. Row5 output: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." Row5: G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. So pattern: a diagonal line of G from the point just after the A diagonal's leading edge (the tip?) The azure diagonal goes from (2,0) to (4,2). Its leading edge is at (4,2) (the farthest down-right). From there, continue same direction (down-right) until hitting red rim (the bottom rows of red). But red rim is horizontal at rows 9-11 across all columns. So the path from (4,2) down-right would go (5,3),(6,4),(7,5),(8,6),(9,7),(10,8),(11,9). However output G appears at (5,3) yes row5 col3 G, (6,4) row6 col4 G, (7,5) row7 col5 G, (8,6) row8 col6 G. Then after hitting red rim at row9? Actually red rows start at row9 (index 9). At (9,7) would be red cell (since row9 is all R). The rule says when hits rim, deflects and streaks away at complementary angle until slides off pan. Complementary angle: reflect across the normal? For a horizontal rim, incoming direction down-right (vector (1,1)). Reflect off horizontal surface would invert vertical component, resulting direction up-right (vector (-1,1)). So after hitting at (9,7) (red), the path should go up-right: (8,8),(7,9),(6,10),(5,11),(4,12 out). But output shows G at (5,9) and (6,8) and (7,7) and (8,? actually row8 col? Wait we have G at (5,9) row5 col9, (6,8) row6 col8, (7,7) row7 col7, (8,6) already part of earlier? Actually (8,6) is part of original down-right path. The reflected path seems to be moving up-left? Let's examine coordinates of G after the red row: Output G at (5,9) (row5 col9) which is up-left from (9,7)? Not exactly. Let's compute path after hitting red at (9,7). Up-right from there would be (8,8) (row8 col8) but output has no G at (8,8). Instead we have G at (5,9) which is far above. Maybe the reflection is off vertical rim? Wait rim is along bottom edge, but also left? Actually red block is a thick ... [10053 chars truncated]
"A melody ascends on a diagonal through silence, strikes a resonant wall of sustained chords, and echoes back transposed."
120b: k=2
See: A short melodic phrase (azure diagonal) moves through rests (black) toward a dense block of sustained harmony (red). The phrase has a clear directional interval.
Do: Extend the phrase's intervallic direction, placing echo notes (green) step by step. When the phrase meets the harmonic wall, it reflects — the pitch direction inverts while the rhythmic direction continues — and the echo trails off into silence.
Grid: Original phrase (azure) and harmonic block (red) persist. Echo notes (green) fill the reflected path.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with azure (A) diagonal phrase moving towards red block at bottom rows. In example1 input: 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Azure A placed at (row3,col1), (row4,col2), (row5,col3) forming diagonal down-right. Red block occupies rows 10-12 all columns (full rows). Output adds green G along a reflected path after hitting red block? Let's see output: green appears forming a diagonal from near bottom right of red block upward left? Let's map coordinates (0-index). Input A at (2,0),(3,1),(4,2). Red rows 9-11 all columns (since rows 10-12). Output: green positions: Row3 (index3) column3? Actually output row4 (index3) has G at column3? Let's list output rows with indices: Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: A at (2,0) Row3: ". A . . . . . . . . . G" => A at (3,1), G at (3,11) Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." => A at (4,2), G at (4,10) Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." => G at (5,3) and (5,9) Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." => G at (6,4) and (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." => G at (7,5) and (7,7) Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." => G at (8,6) Rows9-11: red rows unchanged. So pattern: Starting from the tip of azure diagonal? The azure phrase is three cells. The direction is down-right (south-east). It moves towards red block (south). Actually red block is below, not diagonal. The phrase moves downwards? The phrase's direction interval maybe down-right each step. The echo notes (green) are placed extending the line beyond the red block, reflecting off the red block: after hitting red, direction inverts vertically? Let's see: The green forms a V shape: starting near where azure would intersect red? Let's compute where the line from A would intersect red rows if continued down-right: Starting at (2,0) direction (+1,+1). Continue: (3,1) A, (4,2) A, (5,3) would be next, (6,4), (7,5), (8,6), (9,7), (10,8), (11,9). But rows 9-11 are red rows, so those cells are occupied by red, not green. In output, green appears at (5,3) and (6,4) etc but not where red is. Actually green appears at (5,3) which is row5 col3 (index). Row5 is just above red rows (since red rows start at 9). So green appears before hitting red? Wait row5 is index5, red rows start at 9. So green appears earlier than red. So maybe reflection occurs when hitting the right edge of grid? Let's see positions of green: they form a diagonal from (5,3) to (8,6) (down-right) and also a diagonal from (5,9) to (8,6) (down-left). So they meet at (8,6) which is just above red rows (row8). So they form a V shape meeting at a point just before red block. The point (8,6) is directly above the red block (row9). So maybe the phrase continues until just before red block, then reflects horizontally (direction changes to down-left) creating symmetric path. Thus rule: Starting from the last azure cell (the tip), extend a line in same direction (down-right) step by step, placing green, until the next step would land on a red cell (or beyond ... [8935 chars truncated]
"A squash ball rockets diagonally across the court, smacks the front wall, and careens back at a symmetric angle."
120b: k=1
See: A player's shot trajectory (azure diagonal) cuts across the open court (black) toward a solid front wall (red block along one edge).
Do: Trace the ball's flight from the last contact point, marking its path (green). When it strikes the wall, it bounces — the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection relative to the wall's orientation — and continues until it leaves the court.
Grid: Shot origin (azure) and wall (red) stay fixed. Ball trail (green) appears on open court (black) cells.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure A diagonal from (row2 col0?) Let's index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Given input example1: rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: A . . . . . . . . . . . 3: . A . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . A . . . . . . . . . 5-8 all dots 9-11 rows of R across entire row. So azure diagonal from (2,0),(3,1),(4,2). That's a short diagonal of length 3. Red wall is bottom three rows (rows 9-11) full of R. Output adds green G cells forming a path from last A? Let's see output rows: Rows 0-2 unchanged same A positions. Row3: ". A . . . . . . . . . G" So a G at col11? row3 col11. Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." G at col10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. Rows9-11 unchanged R rows. So pattern: Starting from the last A (the one farthest along diagonal? maybe the tip of shot) at (4,2). The ball travels in direction (1,1) i.e., down-right (south-east) until hits wall? But wall is horizontal at bottom rows. Actually the wall is red block along one edge: here bottom rows (horizontal). The ball would go downwards (south) after reflecting? Let's simulate: Starting point maybe after last A? The "last contact point" maybe the last A cell (most bottom-right of azure). From there, ball moves diagonally down-right (south-east) across black cells until hitting the red wall (which is horizontal). When it hits, it reflects with angle of incidence equals angle of reflection relative to wall orientation. For a horizontal wall, vertical component reverses, horizontal stays same, so direction becomes up-right (north-east). Then continues until leaves grid (top or right edge). The path should be marked green. Let's test: Starting at (4,2). Direction (1,1). Step positions: (5,3) -> G? Output row5 col3 is G yes. (6,4) -> G row6 col4 yes. (7,5) -> G row7 col5 yes. (8,6) -> G row8 col6 yes. (9,7) -> but row9 is red wall (R). Actually row9 col7 is R, so ball hits wall at (9,7) which is a red cell. At that point reflect: direction becomes (-1,1) (up-right). After reflection, continue from the cell before? Usually after hitting wall, the ball would bounce and move to next cell in new direction from the wall cell? The path after bounce includes cells after reflection, not including the wall cell. So next position would be (8,8) (since moving up-right from (9,7) goes to (8,8)). Output has G at (8,8)? Row8 col8 is '.' (since row8 only G at col6). Wait maybe bounce occurs at the edge of wall, not inside wall. Actually wall occupies entire row 9-11. The ball would hit the top edge of the wall at row9? The wall is solid, ball cannot occupy those cells. So the point of contact is just before the wall, i.e., at (8,7) maybe? Let's compute: Starting from (4,2) moving (1,1). Positions: (5,3),(6,4),(7, ... [5026 chars truncated]
"A cold front sweeps diagonally until it collides with a mountain range, then deflects along a mirrored bearing."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A short advancing front line (azure diagonal) pushes across open plains (black) toward a solid mountain range (red block along one edge).
Do: The front extends its diagonal advance, leaving a pressure trail (green). Upon meeting the mountains, the front bounces — the component of motion perpendicular to the range reverses — and the front continues on its new heading until it dissipates beyond the region.
Grid: The initial front (azure) and mountains (red) remain. The pressure trail (green) marks the front's full journey.
"A beam of light enters a cathedral through a narrow diagonal slit and, upon striking the far wall, scatters symmetrically back through the nave."
120b: k=1
See: A diagonal window slit (azure cells) admits light into a dark nave (black) facing a solid stone wall (red block).
Do: Project the light beam from the slit's end along its angle, placing illuminated tiles (green). When the beam hits the stone wall, it reflects at the complementary angle and continues illuminating tiles until it exits the nave.
Grid: The window slit (azure) and stone wall (red) are unchanged. Illuminated tiles (green) trace the beam's path and its reflection.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure A diagonal from (row3,col1) etc? Let's map coordinates (0-index). Input rows: Row0: all . (black) Row1: all . Row2: A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . A . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . A . . . . . . . . . Rows5-8 all . (maybe) Row9-11: all R (red) across entire row. So azure diagonal from (2,0) to (4,2) length 3. Red wall is bottom three rows full of R. Output: same azure unchanged. Green G appear forming a diagonal beam from the end of azure? Let's see output rows: Row0-2 unchanged (same as input). Row3: ". A . . . . . . . . . G" So at row3 col11 (last column) G placed. Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." So G at col10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." So G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. So pattern: a line of G from the tip of azure (which is at (4,2) maybe) projecting down-right? Let's compute: Azure tip is at (4,2). Beam goes down-right (south-east) until hits red wall? But red wall is rows9-11 full. The beam would go from (4,2) to (5,3), (6,4), (7,5), (8,6), (9,7) would be in red row. At (9,7) there is red, so beam hits wall at (9,7). At that point reflect at complementary angle: incoming direction SE (dx=1,dy=1). Complementary angle relative to wall? The wall is horizontal? Actually red wall is horizontal block (full rows). So reflection would be bounce upward? If wall is horizontal, reflect vertical component: direction becomes NE? Wait incoming SE hits horizontal surface, reflect to NE (dx=-1, dy=1?) Actually reflect across horizontal line: vertical component reverses, horizontal stays same. So SE (down-right) becomes NE (up-right). So after hitting at (9,7), continue NE: (8,8), (7,9), (6,10), (5,11), (4,12 out). But output shows G at (5,9) and (6,8) etc? Let's check coordinates: Output G positions: (5,3) (5,9) (6,4) (6,8) (7,5) (7,7) (8,6). That's symmetric around column 6? Actually they form a V shape: from tip (4,2) go down-right to (5,3),(6,4),(7,5),(8,6) then reflect and go up-right? Wait after (8,6) next would be (9,7) which is red, not green. So green stops before red? Actually they placed green up to (8,6) just before hitting red row. Then after reflection they placed green on the other side of the wall? But we see green also at (5,9),(6,8),(7,7),(8,6) already includes (8,6) again? Actually (8,6) appears once. The reflected path would be (8,8?) Wait compute reflection: hitting red at row9, column7 (if beam would go there). But they placed green at (5,9) which is up-right from (9,7) after reflection? Let's trace: Starting from tip (4,2) go SE: (5,3) G, (6,4) G, (7,5) G, (8,6) G, next (9,7) is red wall, so stop before red? They placed G at (8,6) yes. Then reflect: direction becomes NE (dx=-1, dy=1). Starting from the cell before wall? Or from the wall cell? If from (8,6) reflect, next would be (7,7) G, (6,8) ... [6340 chars truncated]
"A cannonball arcs diagonally across the battlefield, ricochets off a fortress rampart, and tumbles away on a deflected trajectory."
120b: k=1
See: A short firing arc (azure diagonal) crosses open ground (black) toward a thick fortress wall (red block along one edge).
Do: Extend the cannonball's trajectory from the last azure position, scorching the ground (green). Upon striking the rampart, the ball ricochets — its motion perpendicular to the wall reverses — and it continues scarring the earth until it flies off the map.
Grid: Firing arc (azure) and rampart (red) persist. Scorch marks (green) trace the ball's flight and ricochet.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input has azure A diagonal from (row2 col0?) Let's index rows 0-11, cols 0-11. Input rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: A . . . . . . . . . . . 3: . A . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . A . . . . . . . . . 5-8 all . etc rows 5-8 all . (maybe) 9: R R R ... all red row 10: R row 11: R row So azure diagonal of length 3 from (2,0),(3,1),(4,2). Red wall is bottom three rows full of red. Output shows green G marks forming a diagonal line extending from last azure position (4,2) downwards right? Let's see output rows: Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2 A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3 . A . . . . . . . . . G Row4 . . A . . . . . . . G . Row5 . . . G . . . . . G . . Row6 . . . . G . . . G . . . Row7 . . . . . G . G . . . . Row8 . . . . . . G . . . . . Rows9-11 red unchanged. Let's map coordinates of G. Row3 col11? Actually row3 has G at last column? Row3: ". A . . . . . . . . . G" that's col11 (0-index). Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." that's col10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." G at col3 and col9. Row6: G at col4 and col8. Row7: G at col5 and col7. Row8: G at col6. So pattern: Starting from last azure at (4,2). Extend diagonal down-right until hitting red wall? The red wall is rows9-11 all columns. The trajectory: from (4,2) direction down-right (south-east). Positions: (5,3),(6,4),(7,5),(8,6),(9,7) would be first red row. At (9,7) is red, so ball hits wall at row9 col7. Upon hitting, ricochet: motion perpendicular to wall reverses. Wall is horizontal (since red rows are horizontal). Perpendicular direction is vertical (south). Reversing vertical component means bounce upward? Actually motion direction before hit: down-right (dx=+1, dy=+1). Wall is horizontal, so normal is vertical. Perpendicular to wall is vertical direction; reversing vertical component means dy becomes -dy while dx stays same? That would be up-right direction (dx=+1, dy=-1). So after bounce, ball moves up-right from the hit point (9,7) but maybe starting from the cell before wall? In output, after hitting, we see green marks also moving up-right from (9,7) but not including the red cell. Let's see: after row9 (red), we have green at (8,6) already part of original path before hit. After bounce, we should have green at (8,8)? Wait up-right from (9,7) would go to (8,8), then (7,9), (6,10), (5,11), then off map. In output, we have green at (5,9) and (6,8) and (7,7) and (8,6) already part of original path. Actually output shows green at (5,9) (row5 col9), (6,8), (7,7), (8,6). That's moving up-left? Let's check coordinates: (5,9) is row5 col9, (6,8) row6 col8, (7,7) row7 col7, (8,6) row8 col6. That's moving down-left? Wait row index increasing downwards. So from (5,9) to (6,8) is down one, left one (south-west). That's direction (+1,-1). That's up-right from perspective of moving upward? Actually after bounce, direction should be up-right (dx=+1, dy=-1) meaning row decreases, column increas ... [7073 chars truncated]
"A spotlight slides diagonally across the stage, hits the backdrop curtain, and bounces its reflection into the wings."
120b: k=1
See: A short diagonal spotlight sweep (azure) moves across a dark stage (black) toward a heavy curtain wall (red block at one edge).
Do: Continue the spotlight's diagonal sweep, leaving afterglow (green) at each position. When it strikes the curtain, the light reflects at a symmetric angle and the afterglow continues until the beam exits the stage.
Grid: Original spotlight positions (azure) and curtain (red) remain. Afterglow (green) traces the sweep and its reflection.
We need to infer rule. Example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input shows azure A diagonal from (row2? Let's index 0). Input rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . A . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . A . . . . . . . . . Rows5-8 all dots. Rows9-11: R repeated across entire row (12 Rs). So red curtain at bottom rows (3 rows? Actually rows9-11 three rows of red). In output, azure A stays same positions. Green G appears forming diagonal from A positions downwards rightwards? Let's see output rows: Row0 all dots. Row1 all dots. Row2: A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . A . . . . . . . . . G Row4: . . A . . . . . . . G . Row5: . . . G . . . . . . G . Row6: . . . . G . . . G . . . Row7: . . . . . G . G . . . . Row8: . . . . . . G . . . . . Rows9-11 unchanged red rows. So green trace forms a diagonal line starting from the last A? Actually A at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2). The beam starts at first A? The description: short diagonal spotlight sweep (azure) moves across dark stage toward heavy curtain wall (red block at one edge). Continue sweep, leaving afterglow (green) at each position. When it strikes curtain, reflects at symmetric angle and afterglow continues until exits. So azure positions form a short diagonal line of length 3 heading down-right. The beam continues beyond the last azure (at (4,2)) moving same direction (down-right) until hits red block (which starts at row9). At each step, place green. Then reflect off red block (like mirror) and continue with afterglow until exits stage (grid). The red block is a horizontal wall at bottom rows (rows9-11). The beam hits the top of the red block at column? Let's compute: Starting from (4,2) direction (1,1). Continue: (5,3) -> green? In output row5 col3 is G (yes). (6,4) G (row6 col4). (7,5) G (row7 col5). (8,6) G (row8 col6). Next step (9,7) would be inside red block (row9 col7 is R). So beam hits curtain at (9,7) which is red. At that point reflect symmetric angle: incoming direction (1,1) hits horizontal surface? Actually red block is a thick wall (multiple rows). The reflection likely inverts vertical component (dy) while keeping horizontal? Since hitting a horizontal wall, reflect upward: direction becomes (-1,1) (up-right). Then continue afterglow: next position after reflection would be (8,8) (since from hit point (9,7) reflect to go up-right). In output we see green at (8,8)? Row8 col8 is '.'? Wait row8 has G at col6 only. No other G. Actually after reflection, we see green at (7,7)? Let's check output: Row7 col7 is G? Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." So at row7 col7 (0-index) there is G. That's (7,7). That matches after reflection: from hit point (9,7) reflect to go up-right: step to (8,8) would be row8 col8, but we have G at (7,7). Hmm maybe reflection occurs at the top edge of red block (row9) and then direction becomes (-1,0?) Not. Let's trace actual green positions after row8 col6: output also has G at row7 col7, r ... [7445 chars truncated]
"A vine grows diagonally along the ground, hits a garden wall, then climbs back at an angle as though repelled by stone."
120b: k=1
See: A short diagonal vine shoot (azure) creeps across bare soil (black) toward a solid garden wall (red block along one edge).
Do: Extend the vine from its growing tip along the same diagonal, leaving tendrils (green). When it reaches the wall, the vine's growth direction reflects off the barrier, and it continues spreading tendrils until it grows beyond the garden's edge.
Grid: Root vine (azure) and wall (red) stay. New tendrils (green) mark the vine's extended and reflected growth path.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x12? Actually 12 rows, 12 columns. Input shows azure A diagonal from (row2? Let's index 0). Input rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: A . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . A . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . A . . . . . . . . . Rows5-8 all dots. Row9-11: all R across. So azure diagonal from (2,0) to (4,2) length 3. Red wall bottom rows rows9-11 full width. Output: same azure unchanged. New green G appear forming a diagonal extension from tip? Let's see output rows: Row0-1 unchanged dots. Row2 same A at (2,0) Row3: . A ... G at column? Row3 output: ". A . . . . . . . . . G". So G at column 11? Actually row length 12. So column index 11 (last). That's far right. Row4: ". . A . . . . . . . G ." G at column 10. Row5: ". . . G . . . . . G . ." G at col3 and col9. Row6: ". . . . G . . . G . . ." G at col4 and col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . G . . . ." G at col5 and col7. Row8: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6. So pattern: Starting from tip of azure diagonal at (4,2) (row4 col2). The vine extends along same diagonal direction (down-right) until hitting red wall? The red wall is rows9-11 all columns. The diagonal from (4,2) down-right would go (5,3), (6,4), (7,5), (8,6), (9,7) which is within red wall row9 col7. At that point reflect off barrier (like bounce) and continue spreading tendrils? The output shows green at (5,3) (row5 col3) yes. (6,4) row6 col4 yes. (7,5) row7 col5 yes. (8,6) row8 col6 yes. Then after hitting wall at row9 col7, reflect direction? The reflected path would go down-left? Starting from (9,7) reflect off vertical? Actually wall is horizontal line (full row). Reflection off barrier would invert vertical component? Since wall is horizontal, hitting from above, reflect upward? But they continue beyond garden edge (outside grid). However output shows green also at positions after reflection: (5,9), (6,8), (7,7), (8,? maybe 6 already). Let's examine: Row5 also has G at col9. Row6 G at col8. Row7 G at col7. Row8 none? Actually row8 only G at col6 (the original path). So the reflected path seems to go up-right? Wait coordinates: After hitting wall at row9 col7, reflect direction to go up-right? Starting point maybe (9,7) reflect to go up-right (i.e., direction -1,+1). Then positions: (8,8) would be row8 col8 but not present. Instead we have (5,9) etc. Let's compute: If reflect and continue beyond wall, maybe they start from the point of impact and go further down-right beyond wall (outside) but also produce mirrored tendrils on other side of wall? Actually output shows symmetric green on other side of diagonal: positions (5,9) etc correspond to a diagonal from (5,9) up-left? Let's list coordinates of green: (3,11) (4,10) (5,3) (5,9) (6,4) (6,8) (7,5) (7,7) (8,6) Also (3,11) and (4,10) are beyond the wall? Row3 and 4 are above the wall, but they are far right side. Those seem to be continuation of reflected path after bounce? Let's think: The vine after hittin ... [7487 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has an orange (O) background containing several distinct non-orange colored shapes, each made up of a different number of cells. Each color appears exactly once as a distinct group of cells scattered across the grid. The key feature of each shape is simply how many cells it occupies — its position and arrangement in the input do not matter.
Do: 1. Identify all distinct non-orange colors in the input and count the number of cells each color occupies. 2. Rank the colors from most cells (largest) to fewest cells (smallest). 3. Let n be the number of distinct colors. The output grid is (2n−1) × (2n−1). 4. Build the output as concentric rectangular rings, each one cell wide, nesting inward: the largest color forms the outermost ring, the second-largest forms the next ring inward, and so on, with the smallest color filling the single center cell. 5. If two colors have the same cell count, their relative order may be ambiguous; otherwise, strict descending cell count determines ring order from outside to inside.
Grid: The output grid is always a square of side length (2n−1), where n is the number of distinct non-orange colors in the input. There is no background color in the output — every cell belongs to one of the concentric rings. The grid is symmetric about both axes and both diagonals.
"Russian nesting dolls are packed away, each one's importance measured by its weight."
120b: k=1
See: Scattered across an orange workshop table lie the disassembled pieces of a set of nesting dolls — each painted a different color, some larger and heavier than others. The dolls have tumbled out of order; their sizes are all you need to know, not where they landed.
Do: The dollmaker gathers the pieces and reassembles the set. The heaviest doll becomes the outermost shell, the next heaviest nestles inside it, and so on, each one cradled snugly within the last, until the tiniest doll — light as a single breath — sits alone at the very heart.
Grid: The finished nesting doll, viewed from above, is a perfect square window into concentric colored shells. Each shell is exactly one layer thick, and the whole assembly grows symmetrically outward from the tiny center doll. The workshop table is gone — every inch of the view belongs to a doll.
We need to infer rule. Input grid contains various colors; output is a small square of concentric layers based on "heaviest" meaning maybe frequency? In example1: Input 6x6 with colors O, Y, M. Output 3x3 with Y outer, M center? Actually output shows Y border, M center. So they identified heaviest doll = outermost shell = most frequent color? Let's count frequencies in example1 input. Let's compute: Grid 6x6. Rows: 1 O O O O O O -> 6 O 2 O O O Y Y O -> O4? actually O O O Y Y O => O4? positions: O O O (3) Y Y O (1 O) => O4, Y2 3 O O O Y Y O => same O4, Y2 4 M O O O O O => M1, O5 5 M M O O O O => M2, O4 6 O O O O O O => O6 Total O: row1 6 + row2 4 + row3 4 + row4 5 + row5 4 + row6 6 = 29? Let's sum: 6+4=10, +4=14, +5=19, +4=23, +6=29. Y: row2 2 + row3 2 =4. M: row4 1 + row5 2 =3. Heaviest (most frequent) is O (29). But output outermost is Y, not O. So maybe heaviest means "largest size" defined by something else like area of contiguous region? Let's examine shapes. Input likely contains clusters of colors representing pieces of dolls. The "size" maybe number of cells in each connected component (4-neighbor?). Let's find connected components for each color. We need to see clusters: O appears everywhere, likely background. Y appears as a 2x2 block at positions (2,4-5) and (3,4-5). That's a 2x2 square. M appears as two cells at (4,1) and (5,1-2). That's an L shape of 3 cells. So Y region size 4, M region size 3. O region is huge but maybe considered background not a doll? The description: pieces of nesting dolls each painted a different color, some larger and heavier than others. The heaviest doll becomes outermost shell. So we need to sort pieces by size (area) descending, then create concentric squares with those colors, smallest at center. In example, Y size 4 > M size 3, so Y outer, M inner. Output is 3x3 with Y border and M center. That matches. Thus rule: Identify distinct non-background colors? But which is background? Possibly the color that appears most (O) is the table, to be ignored. The remaining colors are pieces. Sort by component size (number of cells). Then produce a square of size (2* n -1?) Actually with two colors we got 3x3. For k colors, output size = 2*k -1? Let's test: k=2 => size 3. Yes. If there were 3 colors, size would be 5, etc. The output is concentric layers each one cell thick, outermost color = largest piece, then next, etc, innermost = smallest piece. Now test input: we need to identify colors other than background. Determine background color: likely the most frequent color overall. Let's count frequencies. We have colors: O, W, R, X, A, B, . (black), maybe others. Let's list grid 8x8. I'll index rows. Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each color. Initialize counts. We'll go row by row. Row1: O x? positions: O,O,W,O,O,R,R ... [6590 chars truncated]
"Cells in a petri dish compete for territory; the most abundant organism claims the outer membrane, while rarer species are pushed toward the nucleus."
120b: k=1
See: A culture medium dotted with colonies of different species, each occupying varying amounts of space.
Do: The colonies reorganize into a single organism — the most prolific species forms the cell wall, each less abundant species forms the next membrane inward, and the rarest becomes the nucleus.
Grid: The output is a perfectly symmetric organism whose layers correspond to species abundance, outermost to innermost.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's list. Example1 Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output grid (3x3): Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: Count frequencies of colors in input. Colors present: O (orange), Y (yellow), M (magenta). Count each. Let's count O: many. Let's compute quickly. Row1: 6 O. Row2: O O O Y Y O => O count 4. Row3: same 4. Row4: M O O O O O => O count5. Row5: M M O O O O => O count4. Row6: 6 O. Total O =6+4+4+5+4+6=29? Wait 6+4=10, +4=14, +5=19, +4=23, +6=29. Yes. Y count: Row2 two Y, Row3 two Y => total 4. M count: Row4 one M, Row5 two M => total 3. So frequencies: O most (29), Y second (4), M least (3). According to description: most prolific forms cell wall (outermost layer), next forms next membrane inward, rarest becomes nucleus (center). Output is symmetric organism with layers corresponding to abundance, outermost to innermost. Output grid 3x3 shows Y outer layer? Actually output shows Y on all outer cells, M at center, Y also at corners? Wait output: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y So outer ring is Y, center is M. No O present. So O (most abundant) disappeared? According to description, outermost layer should be most abundant species. But output shows Y (second abundant) as outermost. Maybe they discard the most abundant (background) and use next as outermost, then next as inner, etc. So they ignore the most common color (maybe considered background). Then they create concentric layers based on remaining colors sorted by decreasing frequency (most to least) mapping to outer to inner. Thus we have two layers: outermost Y (more frequent among non-background), inner M (least). That matches. Thus rule: Identify the most frequent color overall; treat it as background and remove. Then among remaining colors, sort by frequency descending. Create a symmetric square output where each layer (border) is filled with the corresponding color, outermost layer with most frequent among remaining, next inner layer with next, etc., until colors exhausted. Output size equals 2*L+1 where L = number of distinct non-background colors? In example, there are 2 colors => output size 3 (since layers: outer border + center). For n colors, output dimension = 2n-1? Let's test: if 2 colors => 3 = 2*2-1 =3 correct. So formula: size = 2k-1 where k = number of distinct colors excluding most frequent (background). Fill layers. Now test input: we need to count frequencies of each color. Test Input grid dimensions? Let's list rows (8 rows, each 8 columns). Represent. Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each symbol: O, W, R, X, A, ., B. We'll tally. Initialize counts. Row1: O O W O O R R R - O: positions 1,2,4,5 => 4 O - W:1 - R:3 (positions 6,7,8) => 3 R Row2: O O ... [5099 chars truncated]
"Celestial bodies drift in scattered clusters through the void; gravity draws them into a planetary cross-section — the most abundant element forms the crust, each rarer element settles closer to the core."
120b: k=1
See: Scattered clusters of different cosmic matter, each element present in different quantities.
Do: Gravitational collapse arranges them concentrically: the most abundant element solidifies as the outer crust, the next as the mantle, continuing until the rarest element crystallizes as the single-cell core.
Grid: A square cross-section of the planet, symmetric concentric shells from crust to core.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's parse. Example1 Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output grid is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: We have colors: O (orange), Y (yellow), M (magenta). The rule: count frequencies? Let's count occurrences in input. Count O: many. Count Y: appears 4? Actually rows2-3 have Y Y each, so total 4 Y. Count M: appears 3? Row4 col1 M, row5 col1 M, row5 col2 M => 3 M. O rest. Abundance: O most abundant, then Y, then M least. According to metaphor: most abundant becomes outer crust, next mantle, rarest core single cell. Output is concentric shells: outer ring of most abundant? Wait output shows outer ring Y (yellow) and center M. So outer ring is Y, inner core M. That suggests Y is most abundant? But Y count 4, M count 3, O count many >? O count maybe 6*6=36 total cells minus 4-3 =29 O. O is most abundant. Yet output outer ring is Y, not O. So maybe we ignore O because it's background? Perhaps O is considered empty/space? In output they only include colors that are not O (maybe O is background). So we consider only non-O colors: Y and M. Among those, Y more abundant than M, so Y outer ring, M core. That matches. Thus rule: Identify distinct colors other than a designated "background" (maybe O). Determine their frequencies. Arrange them in concentric squares (or maybe diamond?) with most frequent forming outermost layer, next forming next layer, etc., until innermost single cell (if odd number of layers). Output grid size equals 2*layers-1? For two colors, layers=2 => output size 3x3 (2*2-1). Outer layer filled with most frequent color, inner layer (size 1) with next color. If more colors, would have more layers. Thus we need to apply to test input. Determine background color? In example, O is background. In test input, there are many colors: O, W, R, X, A, B, . (black). Which is background? Likely O again? But there are also '.' black maybe background? In example '.' not present. In test input, '.' appears as black cells maybe background? Let's examine grid. Test Input 8x8: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . We need to identify background color that will be ignored. In example, O is background, but O also appears in outer ring of output? No, output only Y and M. So O ignored. In test, there are many O's, also many X, etc. Which is background? Could be O again, as it's most common maybe. Let's count frequencies of each non-O color. Let's tally. We'll parse each cell. I'll create counts. Initialize dict. Row1: O,O,W,O,O,R,R,R - O count +2? Actually O appears positions 1,2,4,5 =4 O. W count 1, R count 3. Row2: O O W O O R O R - O positions 1,2,4,5,7 =5 O. W +1 (now total W 2). R positions 6,8 =2 R (total R 5). (Note there is O at 7) Row3: X ... [6305 chars truncated]
"Flotsam of different colors drifts in scattered patches across the sea; the tide pushes it all into a single reef — the most plentiful debris forms the outer reef wall, the scarcest piece lodges at the heart."
120b: k=1
See: An ocean surface with scattered patches of colored debris, each color in different quantities.
Do: The tide compresses the debris into a square reef: the most abundant color forms the outermost barrier, each less abundant color the next inner layer, with the rarest piece at the very center.
Grid: A top-down reef cross-section, symmetric concentric rings of debris, one color per ring.
We need to infer rule from example. Only one training example given? Input 6x6, output 3x3. Input grid has colors O, Y, M. Need to count frequencies? Let's count in example. Input grid: Row1: O O O O O O (6 O) Row2: O O O Y Y O (4 O,2 Y) Row3: O O O Y Y O (same) Row4: M O O O O O (5 O,1 M) Row5: M M O O O O (4 O,2 M) Row6: O O O O O O (6 O) Total counts: O: row1 6 + row2 4 + row3 4 + row4 5 + row5 4 + row6 6 = 29? Let's sum: 6+4=10, +4=14, +5=19, +4=23, +6=29 O. Y: row2 2 + row3 2 =4 Y. M: row4 1 + row5 2 =3 M. So most abundant O, then Y, then M least. Output 3x3: Y Y Y / Y M Y / Y Y Y. That's a ring of Y surrounding center M. No O present. So rule: take colors sorted by abundance, create concentric square (ring) pattern with most abundant as outermost? But output shows Y outermost, M inner, O omitted. Wait most abundant O is not present. Perhaps we only consider colors that appear at least some threshold? Or maybe we compress to smallest square that can contain all colors except the most abundant which becomes background (ignored). The description: "most abundant color forms the outermost barrier, each less abundant color the next inner layer, with the rarest piece at the very center." That suggests outermost = most abundant. But output shows outermost = Y (second most). So maybe they exclude the most abundant because it's considered background and removed, then the next most abundant becomes outermost. That matches: O is background removed, Y outermost, M center. Thus rule: Identify colors present. Determine frequencies. Remove the most frequent color (treat as background). Then create a square output where the remaining colors are arranged in concentric rings ordered by decreasing frequency (most frequent among remaining becomes outer ring, etc.) The size of output square is (2*number_of_remaining_colors -1). For 2 remaining colors (Y and M) => size = 3. Indeed output 3x3. If there were 3 remaining colors, size would be 5, etc. Now test input: we need to count frequencies of each color in the given grid. Then remove most abundant color, then order remaining by frequency descending to create concentric rings. Let's parse test input grid (8x8). Provide rows: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . We need to count each color: O, W, R, X, A, ., B. Also maybe other colors? Let's list. We'll count. Initialize counts dict. Traverse rows. Row1: O,O,W,O,O,R,R,R - O: +4? Actually O appears positions 1,2,4,5 => 4 O. - W: +1 - R: +3 Row2: O O W O O R O R - O: positions 1,2,4,5,7 =>5 O - W: +1 (now total W 2) - R: positions 6,8 =>2 R (total R 5) Row3: X O O O O O O O - X: +1 - O: positions 2-8 =>7 O (total O now 4+5+7=16) Row4: X X O A O O O O - X: +2 (total X 3) - O: positions 3,5,6,7,8 =>5 O (total O 21) - A: +1 Row5: X O O O O . O O - X: +1 (total X 4) - O: positions 2,3,4,5,7,8 => ... [5524 chars truncated]
"Components of different types lie scattered on a workbench; the engineer solders them into a chip layout — the most numerous component forms the outermost trace ring, the rarest sits as the single central transistor."
120b: k=1
See: A workbench with scattered electronic components in groups of varying quantity.
Do: Design a square chip: the most numerous component forms the outer ring of traces, the next most numerous the next ring, nesting inward until the rarest component occupies the single center pad.
Grid: A square chip diagram, concentric trace rings each one unit wide, perfectly symmetric.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's parse example1. Input: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Count each color: O, Y, M. Count O: many. Let's count: total cells 36. Y appears at positions (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5) => 4 Y. M appears at (4,1),(5,1),(5,2) => 3 M. O rest = 36-7=29. Rule: most numerous component forms outer ring of traces, next most forms next ring, nesting inward until rarest occupies center pad. Output is 3x3 grid: Y outer ring, M center? Wait output: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y That's outer ring Y, center M. So most numerous O becomes outer ring? But output uses Y outer ring. So maybe we ignore O because it's background? The description: "most numerous component forms the outer ring of traces". In input, O is most numerous, but output outer ring is Y, not O. So perhaps we consider only components that are not background? Maybe background is the most numerous and is ignored. Then next most numerous (Y) becomes outer ring, next (M) inner, etc. That matches: Y outer ring, M center. So rule: Identify colors present, sort by frequency descending, ignore the most frequent (background). Then create a square output whose size equals number of distinct colors (excluding background?) Actually output size 3x3 because there are 2 non-background colors? But size 3 corresponds to number of distinct colors (including background?) Let's think: we have 3 colors total (O,Y,M). Output is 3x3. So size equals number of distinct colors. Outer ring corresponds to second most frequent (Y), inner ring to third most (M). Center is single cell for rarest. If there were more colors, would have more rings. Thus algorithm: Determine distinct colors in input. Let n = number of distinct colors. Create n x n output grid. Sort colors by frequency descending. The most frequent is background, not used? Actually outermost ring uses second most frequent, then next ring uses third, etc, until center uses least frequent. So we map frequencies rank 2 -> outermost ring, rank 3 -> next ring, ..., rank n -> center cell. If there are only 2 colors, then output would be 2x2? Outer ring would be second most frequent (i.e., the less frequent) and center? But 2x2 has no single center cell. Might be ambiguous but not needed. Now apply to test input. We need to count frequencies of each color in test input grid. Let's list grid rows (8 columns each, 8 rows). I'll label coordinates. Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . Note: '.' is black. We need counts for each symbol: O, W, R, X, A, B, ., maybe others. Let's count. Initialize counts dict. We'll go row by row. Row1: O O W O O R R R - O: positions 1,2,4,5 => 4 O - W: 1 - R: 3 (positions 6,7,8) => 3 R Row2: O O W O O R O R - O: positions 1,2,4,5,7 => 5 O (add) - W: +1 => ... [8939 chars truncated]
"Divine essences lie scattered across the mortal plane; an ancient summoning ritual gathers them into a mandala — the most abundant essence inscribes the outer circle of protection, the rarest becomes the sacred center."
120b: k=1
See: Scattered pools of divine essence across a landscape, each deity's power present in different measure.
Do: The ritual arranges them into a square mandala: the most abundant essence draws the outermost circle, each scarcer essence the next inner ring, until the rarest spark occupies the single sacred center.
Grid: A square mandala, concentric rings of divine essence, symmetric on all axes.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's list. Example1 Input: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y So output is 3x3 grid. It seems they took the most abundant color? Let's count colors in input. Colors present: O, Y, M. Count O: many. Y: appears 4? Actually rows2-3 have Y Y at columns4-5 each row => total 4 Y. M appears at (4,1) and (5,1-2) => three M? Wait row4 col1 M, row5 col1 M, row5 col2 M => three M. O rest. Most abundant among non-O? Y count 4, M count 3. So Y is most abundant, M next. Output is a 3x3 mandala: outer ring Y, inner center M. That matches description: most abundant essence draws outermost circle, each scarcer next inner ring, until rarest spark occupies center. So we need to produce concentric rings with colors sorted by frequency (excluding maybe background?). The output size seems to be (2*number_of_distinct_colors -1)? Here distinct colors (excluding background?) are Y and M => 2 colors => output size 3 (2*2-1). Yes. The outer ring is most abundant (Y), inner ring M. Now test input: we need to count colors (excluding maybe background?). Colors present: O, W, R, X, A, B, . (black). Also maybe others. Need to count frequencies of each non-background? Which is background? In example, O seems background (orange). They used Y and M as non-background colors. So background is the most common color? Actually O appears many times, more than Y and M. So they treat O as background and ignore it for mandala. So we need to consider all colors except the most frequent (background). Then among remaining colors, sort by frequency descending, assign outermost ring to most frequent among them, next inner ring to next, etc, until center is rarest. Thus we need to count frequencies of each color in test input, find the most common overall (background) and ignore it. Then list other colors sorted by count descending. Let's count. I'll parse grid 8x8. Rows: 1: O O W O O R R R 2: O O W O O R O R 3: X O O O O O O O 4: X X O A O O O O 5: X O O O O . O O 6: O O B O O . . O 7: O B B B O O . . 8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each symbol. Initialize counts. We'll go row by row. Row1: O x2? Actually O O W O O R R R => O count 4? positions 1,2,4,5 = O four. W count 1. R count 3. Row2: O O W O O R O R => O positions 1,2,4,5,7 =5 O. W +1 (now total W 2). R positions 6,8 =2 R (total R 5). (Note there is also O at 7). Good. Row3: X O O O O O O O => X 1, O 7 (positions 2-8). So O +7 => total O now 4+5+7=16. X total 1. Row4: X X O A O O O O => X +2 => total X 3. O at col3,5,6,7,8 =5 O => total O 21. A 1. Row5: X O O O O . O O => X +1 => total X 4. O at col2,3,4,5,7,8 =6 O => total O 27. . (black) count 1. Row6: O O B O O . . O => O at 1,2,4,5,8 =5 O => total O 32. B at col3 =1 B. . at col6,7 =2 . => total . now 3. Row7: O B B B O O . . => O at col1,5,6 =3 O => total ... [4002 chars truncated]
"Dancers from different companies rehearse in scattered clusters; the choreographer calls formation and they assemble into concentric rings — the largest company frames the outside, the lone dancer holds center stage."
120b: k=1
See: A rehearsal hall with scattered groups of dancers, each company a different size.
Do: At the cue, form a square formation: the largest company lines the outer edge, the next largest the ring inside, continuing until the smallest company — a single dancer — takes the center position.
Grid: An overhead view of the formation, each concentric ring one dancer wide, perfectly symmetric.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's map. Example1 Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output grid is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: The input contains groups of colors: O (orange) background, Y (yellow) a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5, M (magenta) at rows4-5 col1-2? Actually M at (4,1) and (5,1-2). So shape: M forms an L shape? Let's map coordinates (1-indexed). Y block: (2,4)(2,5)(3,4)(3,5). M cells: (4,1) and (5,1)(5,2). That's 3 M cells. Goal: produce concentric squares with largest company outer edge, next inner, etc. Output 3x3 shows outer ring Y, inner center M, outer ring Y again? Actually output shows Y on all outer cells, M at center, Y at corners? Wait 3x3 grid: positions: (1,1) Y, (1,2) Y, (1,3) Y (2,1) Y, (2,2) M, (2,3) Y (3,1) Y, (3,2) Y, (3,3) Y So outer ring all Y, center M. So largest company = Y (size 4 cells) forms outer ring of 3x3 (8 cells). Next largest = M (size 3 cells) forms center (1 cell). But M had 3 cells originally, not 1. So they compress each company's cells into a ring of width 1, preserving ordering by size. The smallest company (maybe O?) becomes center? But O is background maybe ignored. Thus rule: Identify distinct colors (excluding background?) Count number of cells per color. Sort descending by count. Then create a square output where each concentric ring (width 1) is filled with the color of the corresponding rank (largest outermost). The size of output square is determined by number of distinct colors? In example, there are 2 colors (Y and M) considered, output size 3 (odd). For n colors, output size = 2*n-1? For n=2, size=3 matches. So each ring corresponds to a color, outermost ring width 1, then inner ring width 1, etc, until center cell is smallest color? But we have only 2 colors, outer ring Y, inner center M. That matches. Now test input: we need to identify groups (companies) of each color (excluding maybe background). Determine counts. Then sort descending, assign outermost ring to largest, next to second, etc. Output size = 2*number_of_colors-1. But need to decide which colors are considered. In example, O appears many cells (background). It is not used in output. So O is background (maybe the most common color). So we need to treat the most frequent color as background and ignore it. The other colors are companies. Thus steps: Count each color frequency. Identify the most frequent color (background). Exclude it. Remaining colors sorted by count descending. Number of remaining colors = k. Output size = 2*k-1. Fill concentric rings: outermost ring color = most frequent among remaining (largest company), next inner ring = second most frequent, etc. If tie? Not needed. Now test input grid dimensions? Let's parse. Rows given (8 rows? Actually lines): 1: O O W O O R R R 2: O O W O O R O R 3: X O O O O O O O 4: X X O A O O O O 5: X O O O O . O O 6: O O B O O . . O 7: O B B B O ... [5641 chars truncated]
"Mineral deposits of different abundances lie scattered through sediment; tectonic pressure compresses them into a geode — the most plentiful mineral crystallizes as the outer shell, the rarest as the hidden crystal at the core."
120b: k=1
See: A cross-section of sediment with scattered mineral deposits of varying abundance.
Do: Pressure forms a square geode: the most abundant mineral hardens into the outer shell, each less abundant mineral forms the next inner band, and the rarest mineral crystallizes as the single center point.
Grid: A square geode cross-section, concentric mineral bands from shell to core, symmetric on all axes.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Actually example 1 input is 6x6. Output is 3x3. So transformation reduces to a smaller grid representing concentric bands based on abundance of colors in input? Let's analyze. Example1 Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Count each color: O: many. Let's count: Row1 6 O. Row2: O O O ? actually row2: O O O Y Y O => O count 4. Row3 same 4. Row4: M O O O O O => O count 5. Row5: M M O O O O => O count 4. Row6: 6 O. Total O =6+4+4+5+4+6=29. Y: row2 two Y, row3 two Y => total 4. M: row4 one M, row5 two M => total 3. So most abundant is O, then Y, then M least. Output 3x3 grid: outer shell Y, inner center M, outer corners Y? Actually output: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y So outer ring is Y, center M. No O present. So rule: most abundant mineral becomes outer shell? Wait description says most abundant mineral hardens into outer shell, each less abundant forms next inner band, rarest as single center point. In example, most abundant is O, but outer shell is Y (second most). So maybe they ignore background (maybe O is considered background and not part of geode). The "cross-section of sediment with scattered mineral deposits" maybe O is sediment (background) and other colors are minerals. So we consider only non-O colors. Among those, most abundant is Y (4) vs M (3). So outer shell Y, inner M. That matches. Thus rule: Identify distinct colors other than a designated background (maybe O). Determine frequencies among those colors. Sort descending abundance. Build a square output where outermost layer is most abundant, next inner layer second most, etc., until center is rarest. Output size equals 2* (number of distinct colors) -1? In example, there are 2 colors (Y, M) => output size 3 (2*2-1). Yes. Thus output is a square of size (2n-1) where n = number of distinct non-background colors. Fill concentric squares: outermost all most frequent color, then next inner all second most, etc., with center single cell of least frequent. Now test input: we need to identify background color. In example background is O (orange). In test input there are many O's as well. Likely O is background again. So we consider other colors: W (maroon), R (red), X (grey), A (azure), B (blue), . (black). Also maybe others? Let's list. Input grid 8x8: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each non-O color. We'll count: W: appears row1 col3, row2 col3 => 2. R: row1 col6-8 (3), row2 col6 and col8 (2) plus row2 col7 is O, row1 col7? Actually row1 col7 is R, col8 R. So total R count = row1: positions 6,7,8 =3. Row2: col6=R, col8=R =>2. Row2 col7 O. So total R =5. X: row3 col1, row4 col1-2, row5 col1 => that's 1+2+1=4. A: row4 col4 =1. . (black): row5 col6, row6 col6, row6 col ... [5866 chars truncated]
"Ingredients scattered across the counter are layered into a terrine — the most plentiful ingredient wraps the outside, cradling each scarcer filling toward the center."
120b: k=1
See: A countertop with scattered clusters of different ingredients, each measured in unequal portions.
Do: Assemble a square terrine: the ingredient you have most of coats the outer shell, the next most plentiful lines the inside, continuing inward until the scarcest ingredient sits as the jewel in the middle.
Grid: A square cross-section of the terrine, perfectly symmetric, each layer one unit thick.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is 6x6? Let's see example1 input grid 6x6. Output is 3x3. So transformation reduces size. Description: "assemble a square terrine: the ingredient you have most of coats the outer shell, the next most plentiful lines the inside, continuing inward until the scarcest ingredient sits as the jewel in the middle." So we count colors in input, sort by frequency descending. Then create a square output where layers (border, inner border, etc.) are filled with colors in that order, outermost most frequent, innermost least frequent. Output size? For 6x6 input, output 3x3. Possibly size = sqrt(N) where N is number of distinct colors? Not. Let's compute frequencies in example1. Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O (6 O) Row2: O O O Y Y O (4 O,2 Y) Row3: O O O Y Y O (same) Row4: M O O O O O (5 O,1 M) Row5: M M O O O O (4 O,2 M) Row6: O O O O O O (6 O) Count O: row1 6 + row2 4 + row3 4 + row4 5 + row5 4 + row6 6 = 29? Let's sum: 6+4+4+5+4+6=29. Y: row2 2 + row3 2 =4. M: row4 1 + row5 2 =3. Total cells 36. So frequencies: O 29, Y 4, M 3. Sorted descending: O, Y, M. Output 3x3: outer border Y? Wait output shows Y outer, M center, Y border again? Actually output: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y So outermost layer is Y, inner (center) is M. That suggests most frequent (O) is not present; they used the two less frequent colors only. Maybe they ignore the most frequent? The description: "ingredient you have most of coats the outer shell". But outer shell in output is Y, which is not most frequent. So maybe they consider only colors that appear in the input but not the background? Perhaps O is considered background (like empty) and not used. The most abundant non-background color is Y (4) then M (3). So O is background (maybe considered "empty" or "no ingredient"). So we need to treat a particular color as background? In example, O appears everywhere, maybe it's the default filler not counted. So we need to identify which color is the "most common overall" and treat it as background, then use remaining colors sorted by frequency to fill layers. Thus output size 3x3 corresponds to number of distinct non-background colors = 2, so layers = 2 (outer and inner). For k distinct colors, output will be (2k-1) size? For 2 colors, size 3. For 3 colors would be 5? Let's hypothesize: output dimension = 2 * n -1 where n = number of distinct non-background colors. Because each layer adds 2 to dimension (border thickness 1). Example: n=2 => size 3. Works. Now test input: we need to count colors, find most frequent (background), then order remaining colors by frequency descending, then create output square of size 2*n-1 where n = number of distinct colors excluding background. Fill layers from outermost with most frequent among remaining, then next inner, etc., until center is least frequent. Let's compute frequencies in test input grid. Grid size? Let's count rows: given lines: 1: O O W O O R R R (8) 2: O O W O O R O R (8) 3: X O O O O O O O (8) ... [4921 chars truncated]
"Musicians warming up in scattered practice rooms are called to the stage — the largest section surrounds the ensemble, and the soloist stands alone at the center."
120b: k=1
See: Practice rooms scattered with musicians of different sections, some sections larger than others.
Do: Arrange them on a symmetric stage: the largest section forms the outermost ring, the next largest forms the ring inside it, continuing until the smallest section — the soloist — occupies the single center spot.
Grid: A square stage viewed from above, with concentric borders of musicians, one section per ring.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 6x6? Let's parse example 1. Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: We need to find sections (colors) and arrange them as concentric rings sorted by size. Input has colors: O (orange), Y (yellow), M (magenta). Possibly also others but only these. Count each color occurrences: O: many cells. Y: appears in a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5 => 4 cells. M: appears at (4,1) and (5,1-2) => 3 cells? Actually row4 col1 M, row5 col1 M, row5 col2 M => 3 cells. So sizes: O largest, Y second, M smallest. According to description, largest forms outermost ring, next largest inner ring, smallest center spot. Output is 3x3 with outer ring Y, inner center M? Wait output shows outer ring all Y, center M, but Y is second largest, not largest. Hmm maybe they only output the three colors present, discarding background? The output grid is 3x3, not same size as input. It seems they compress to minimal square containing the sections arranged as rings. In output, outer ring is Y (size 4) and inner center M (size 3). O is not present. So maybe they take the two smallest sections? Or they treat O as background (empty) and ignore it. The description: "Practice rooms scattered with musicians of different sections, some sections larger than others." The stage is square with concentric borders of musicians, one section per ring. So we need to produce a grid where each ring corresponds to a section, sorted by size descending outward. The background maybe not considered a section. So we need to identify distinct colors that are not the most frequent (background). Then order them by size descending outward. In example, background O is most frequent, ignored. Then Y (4) larger than M (3) => outer ring Y, inner M. Output size is determined by number of sections: if there are N sections (excluding background), output is (2N-1) x (2N-1) grid? For N=2, 2*2-1=3 => 3x3 matches. Outer ring thickness 1 cell. So rule: produce a square of size (2k-1) where k = number of distinct non-background colors. Fill rings from outermost to innermost with colors sorted by descending count (largest to smallest). Background omitted. Now test input: we need to parse grid, count colors, identify background (most frequent). Then produce output. Let's parse test input grid. Provided as rows with spaces. Let's list rows: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each color. Colors present: O, W, R, X, A, ., B We need to count occurrences. I'll go row by row. Initialize counts dict. Row1: O O W O O R R R - O: positions 1,2,4,5 => 4 O - W: 1 - R: 3 (col6-8) => 3 R Row2: O O W O O R O R - O: positions 1,2,4,5,7 => 5 O (add) - W: +1 => total W 2 - R: posi ... [5752 chars truncated]
"Athletes from different teams are scattered across the field after a timeout; the referee blows the whistle and they reform into a target formation, the biggest squad claiming the perimeter."
120b: k=1
See: Players from several teams milling about a field in loose clusters of varying sizes.
Do: At the whistle, they snap into a symmetric square formation — the team with the most players lines the outside edge, the next largest team the next ring in, down to the smallest team standing alone at dead center.
Grid: A top-down view of the square formation, each team occupying one concentric band.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's parse example1. Input grid (6x6): Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output grid is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: Teams are colors: O, Y, M. The description: players from several teams milling about a field in loose clusters of varying sizes. At whistle they snap into symmetric square formation — the team with most players lines the outside edge, next largest next ring, smallest at center. So we need to count occurrences of each color (excluding maybe black '.'?), then arrange them as concentric squares (bands) in output grid, with size determined by number of distinct colors? Output is a square with side length = 2* (number of colors -1) +1? For 3 colors, output 3x3 (makes sense). Outer ring color = most frequent, inner ring = second, center = third (least). In example, counts: O appears many, Y appears 4? Actually Y appears at positions (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5) =4. M appears at (4,1),(5,1),(5,2) =3. O appears rest: total cells 36 - 4 -3 =29. So O most frequent, Y second, M least. But output outer ring is Y, not O. Wait output outer ring is Y, inner ring M, center Y? Actually output grid: Row1: Y Y Y Row2: Y M Y Row3: Y Y Y So outer ring Y, center M, inner? Actually 3x3 only has outer ring (border) and center. So outer ring Y, center M. That suggests Y is most frequent? But Y count 4, M 3, O 29. So O is most but not present in output. Maybe O is considered background (empty) and ignored. Indeed O maybe "field" not a team. So we consider only non-O colors as teams. Then counts: Y=4, M=3. So two colors. Output 3x3: outer ring Y (most), center M (least). That matches. Thus rule: Identify non-background color(s) (maybe O is background). Determine distinct colors other than background. Count occurrences. Sort descending. Create smallest square that can accommodate concentric rings for each color: side length = 2* (n-1) +1 where n = number of colors. Fill square with rings: outermost ring color = most frequent, next inner = next, etc., center = least frequent. Output that square. Now test input: grid 8x8? Let's list rows: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . We need to identify background color. In example, O was background. In test, there are many O's, also X, . (black), etc. Which is background? Possibly O again, as many O's. The description: "players from several teams milling about a field" field maybe O. So O is background. So we consider other colors: W, R, X, A, ., B maybe? But '.' is black (maybe also background?). In example, '.' not present. In test, '.' appears as black. Could be also considered a team (players). But black maybe also a team. Need to see pattern: In description, colors represent teams. Could include black. So we treat any color other tha ... [4844 chars truncated]
"Scattered weather systems converge into a single storm — the most widespread pressure zone spirals to the outermost band, while the rarest phenomenon sits in the calm eye."
120b: k=1
See: A weather map with isolated patches of different atmospheric phenomena, each covering different areas.
Do: The systems merge into one grand cyclone: the phenomenon covering the most area forms the outermost wall, the next forms the inner wall, and so on until the least common phenomenon becomes the eye.
Grid: A square cross-section of the storm, with symmetric concentric bands from outer wall to eye.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's map. Example1 Input grid 6x6 with colors O, Y, M. Output is 3x3 grid with Y outer, M center. Let's analyze. Input: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O We need to find "phenomenon covering most area forms outermost wall, next inner wall, etc." So we need to count contiguous patches? The description: isolated patches of different atmospheric phenomena, each covering different areas. They merge into one grand cyclone: the phenomenon covering the most area forms the outermost wall, the next forms the inner wall, and so on until the least common phenomenon becomes the eye. Thus we need to identify distinct colors (phenomena) and their total area (count of cells). Then order by area descending: largest becomes outermost ring, then next inner ring, etc. The output is a concentric square (maybe minimal size) with layers of colors in that order, with the smallest color at center. In example, counts: O appears many cells. Y appears 4 cells (2x2). M appears 3 cells? Actually M cells: row4 col1, row5 col1, row5 col2 = 3. O count: total cells 36 - (4+3)=29. So ordering: O largest, Y second, M smallest. According to rule, outermost wall should be O, then inner Y, then eye M. But output shows outer Y, inner M, center Y? Wait output 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y That's outer Y, inner M, center Y? Actually 3x3 has outer ring of Y, center M, but also corners are Y (outer). No O present. So seems they omitted the most common (O) and used only the two less common? Or maybe they consider only the non-background color? Perhaps O is considered background (like empty) and not part of phenomenon? In description, "isolated patches" maybe O is background. The outermost wall is the phenomenon covering most area among the patches (excluding background). So we need to consider only colors that are not the most frequent overall? Let's test: Among non-O colors, Y count 4, M count 3. So Y larger => outer wall, M inner => eye. That matches output. Thus rule: Identify distinct colors other than the most frequent color (which is considered background). Order them by count descending, assign them to concentric layers from outermost to innermost, producing a square output whose size equals (2*number_of_layers+1) maybe? In example, there are 2 colors (Y, M) => layers = 2 => output size = 2*2-1? Actually 2 layers produce 3x3 (outer layer thickness 1, inner layer thickness 1). So size = 2*layers -1? For layers=2 => 3. Yes formula: size = 2*L -1 where L = number of distinct non-background colors. If there were 3 colors, output would be 5x5 etc. Now test input: we need to count colors, determine background (most frequent). Then order remaining colors by count descending, produce concentric square. Let's parse test input grid. Provided as rows with spaces. Let's list rows: Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4 ... [5002 chars truncated]
"Building materials are stockpiled in scattered heaps around a construction site; the foreman orders them into concentric walls — the most abundant material forms the façade."
120b: k=1
See: A construction site with piles of different materials, each pile a different size.
Do: Build a square structure from the outside in: the most plentiful material becomes the outer wall, the next most plentiful the inner wall, continuing until the scarcest material is laid as the single hearthstone.
Grid: A floor plan of the structure: perfectly symmetric concentric walls, each one unit thick.
We need to infer rule from example. Only one training example given? Input 6x6, output 3x3. Let's analyze. Input grid 6x6 with colors: O, Y, M. Let's count frequencies. Input: Row1: O O O O O O (6 O) Row2: O O O Y Y O (4 O,2 Y) Row3: O O O Y Y O (same) Row4: M O O O O O (5 O,1 M) Row5: M M O O O O (4 O,2 M) Row6: O O O O O O (6 O) Total counts: O: row1 6 + row2 4 + row3 4 + row4 5 + row5 4 + row6 6 = 29? Let's sum: 6+4=10, +4=14, +5=19, +4=23, +6=29 O. Y: row2 2 + row3 2 =4 Y. M: row4 1 + row5 2 =3 M. So most plentiful O, then Y, then M. Output 3x3 grid: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y So outer wall is Y (second most plentiful), inner wall is M (least). Hearthstone would be most plentiful O? But output does not contain O. Wait description: "most plentiful material becomes the outer wall, next most inner, continuing until scarcest material is laid as the single hearthstone." That suggests outermost = most frequent, innermost = least frequent. But output shows outer = Y (second), inner = M (least), no O. So maybe they exclude the most frequent (background) and build walls from remaining colors, with outermost being second most, then third, etc., ending with least as center. The most frequent becomes background (outside of structure) and not part of output. Thus output size is determined by number of distinct colors excluding most frequent? In example, there are 3 colors total. Excluding most frequent O leaves Y and M (2 colors). Concentric walls: outermost Y, inner M, and center? Since only 2 colors, the innermost is a single cell of M (hearthstone). That yields a 3x3 grid (outer ring thickness 1). So size = 2* (number of remaining colors) +1? For k remaining colors, output dimension = 2k+1. Here k=2 => 5? Wait 2*2+1=5, but output is 3. Hmm maybe outermost wall thickness 1, then inner wall thickness 1, then center cell. That's total layers = number of remaining colors =2, plus center =? Actually layers: outermost (color1), inner (color2), then center (color2?) No, they said continue until scarcest material is laid as single hearthstone. So if there are 2 colors (excluding most frequent), then outermost = most plentiful among remaining (Y), then scarcest (M) as hearthstone (single cell). So only two layers: outer ring and center cell. That yields dimension = 2*1 +1 =3. So dimension = 2*(number of remaining colors -1) +3? Let's think: If there are n distinct colors total. Excluding most frequent leaves n-1 colors. The outermost uses the most frequent among those, then each subsequent inner wall uses next, until the last color is a single cell. So number of walls = n-2 (if last is single cell). The total layers = (n-2) walls + 1 center = n-1 layers. The outermost wall thickness 1, each subsequent wall thickness 1, center cell thickness 1. So total dimension = 2*(n-2) +1? For n=3, dimension = 2*(1)+1=3 correct. For n=4, dimension = 2*(2)+1=5. So formula: size = 2*(distinct colors -2) +3? Wait compute: n distinct colors total. Excluding most frequent leaves ... [6154 chars truncated]
"Scattered regiments receive orders to form a defensive square — the largest regiment mans the outer perimeter, each smaller regiment fills the next ring of defense, and the smallest holds the command post."
120b: k=1
See: Regiments of different sizes dispersed across a battlefield.
Do: Form a concentric defensive square: rank regiments by size, place the largest on the outermost wall, the next on the inner wall, and so on, with the smallest detachment guarding the single center position.
Grid: A bird's-eye fortress plan, symmetric on all axes, one regiment per concentric ring.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's map. Example1 Input grid 6x6: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: We need to find concentric rings of regiments (colors) and output a smaller grid representing the rings? The description: "Form a concentric defensive square: rank regiments by size, place the largest on the outermost wall, the next on the inner wall, and so on, with the smallest detachment guarding the single center position. Grid details: symmetric on all axes, one regiment per concentric ring." So we need to identify distinct colors (regiments) present in input, count their occurrences (size). Then sort by size descending. Then create a square output where each ring (border) is filled with the color of that regiment, outermost ring largest, inner next, etc, until center cell is smallest. In example: colors present: O (orange), Y (yellow), M (magenta). Count occurrences. Let's count: O count? Input 6x6 =36 cells. Count Y: appears in rows2-3 columns4-5: that's 2 rows *2 cols =4 Y. M appears rows4-5: row4 col1 M, row5 col1 M, row5 col2 M => total 3 M. O rest: 36-4-3=29 O. Sizes: O largest (29), Y next (4), M smallest (3). According to rule, largest on outermost wall, next inner, smallest center. Output 3x3: outer ring (border) should be O? But output shows Y on outer ring, M center, Y inner? Wait output outer ring is Y, not O. So maybe we only consider non-background? Perhaps O is background (empty) and not a regiment. The regiments are colored other than O. So we ignore O. Then we have Y (size4) and M (size3). Largest Y outer ring, smallest M center. Output 3x3 matches: border Y, center M. Yes. Thus O is considered empty/terrain, not a regiment. So rule: Identify non-O colors, count each, sort descending, then create smallest possible square that can accommodate rings equal to number of colors. The outermost ring gets largest color, next inner gets next, etc, center cell gets smallest (if odd number of colors, center is a single cell; if even maybe 2x2? but likely odd). Output size = 2* n_colors -1? For 2 colors, size = 3 (as example). For k colors, output dimension = 2k-1? Let's test: k=2 => 3 yes. If k=1 => 1. If k=3 => 5 etc. Now apply to test input. We need to parse test input grid. Let's list rows (8 columns each? Actually rows have varying length? Let's count.) Row1: O O W O O R R R => 8 Row2: O O W O O R O R => 8 Row3: X O O O O O O O => 8 Row4: X X O A O O O O => 8 Row5: X O O O O . O O => 8 (note '.' black) Row6: O O B O O . . O => 8 Row7: O B B B O O . . => 8 Row8: B B B B B O O . => 8 So 8x8 grid. We need to identify non-O colors (regiments). Colors present besides O: W (maroon), R (red), X (grey), A (azure), . (black), B (blue). Also maybe others? That's it. We need to count occurrences of each non-O color. Let's count each. I'll go row by ro ... [6069 chars truncated]
"Actors from different troupes loiter backstage; when the curtain rises, they arrange themselves in a living tableau — the largest troupe frames the scene, the smallest stands spotlit at center stage."
120b: k=1
See: Backstage chaos with clusters of costumed actors, each troupe a different size.
Do: The tableau assembles: the largest troupe forms the outer frame, each successively smaller troupe fills the next inner border, and the single smallest performer holds the center spotlight.
Grid: A square stage viewed from above, concentric borders of actors forming a symmetric living picture.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 6x6? Let's write example1 input grid: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: Identify clusters of same color? Let's map. In input, there are colors: O (orange), Y (yellow), M (magenta). The description: largest troupe forms outer frame, each smaller troupe fills next inner border, single smallest performer center. So we need to find distinct connected components (clusters) of same color? Determine sizes. Largest cluster becomes outer border of output, next largest inner border, etc. Output size is maybe based on number of distinct clusters? In example, we have three colors: O (largest?), Y (medium), M (smallest). Output 3x3 shows Y on border, M center, Y also border? Wait output shows Y border all around, M at center, Y also at corners? Actually output grid 3x3: all Y except center is M. So outer border is Y, inner border (just center) is M. No O appears. So O (largest) is omitted? Maybe rule: take the three largest clusters? Let's examine sizes. Count cells: O cells: many. Let's count: Row1 6 O. Row2: first three O then O at end? Row2: O O O Y Y O => O count 4. Row3 same 4. Row4: M O O O O O => O count5. Row5: M M O O O O => O count4. Row6: 6 O. Total O =6+4+4+5+4+6=29. Y cells: positions (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5) => 4 cells. M cells: (4,1),(5,1),(5,2) => 3 cells. So sizes: O largest (29), Y medium (4), M smallest (3). Output shows Y as outer border, M center. O omitted. So maybe we take the two smallest clusters? But description says largest troupe forms outer frame. However here outer frame is Y, not O. So maybe we consider clusters of non-background? Maybe O is background (like empty). The "stage" maybe background is O? In description, maybe O is background color (orange) representing empty stage. The actors are other colors. So we ignore O. Then among remaining colors, largest becomes outer border, next inner, etc. In example, remaining colors are Y (4) and M (3). Largest among them is Y -> outer border. Next is M -> center. That matches. Thus rule: Identify all non-background color clusters (colors other than the most frequent color? Or maybe the color that fills most of grid). Determine their sizes. Sort descending. Create output grid of size N x N where N = number of distinct non-background colors *2 -1? In example, two colors => output size 3 (2*2-1). For three colors would be 5? Let's test with test input: we have many colors besides maybe background. Need to determine which color is background (most frequent). Let's count frequencies in test input. Test input grid 8x8. Let's list rows: 1: O O W O O R R R 2: O O W O O R O R 3: X O O O O O O O 4: X X O A O O O O 5: X O O O O . O O 6: O O B O O . . O 7: O B B B O O . . 8: B B B B B O O . Let's count each color. Initialize counts. We'll go row by row. Row1: O x? positions: O,O,W,O,O,R,R,R => ... [6125 chars truncated]
"Seeds of different flowers lie scattered in unequal handfuls; the gardener plants them in a formal parterre — the most abundant bloom borders the entire bed, each rarer variety rings closer to the centerpiece."
120b: k=1
See: A potting bench with scattered groups of different seeds, each group a different count.
Do: Plant a square parterre garden: the most plentiful flower forms the outer border, the next most plentiful the next ring inward, until the rarest single bloom is the centerpiece.
Grid: An overhead view of the garden bed, each concentric ring one row wide, perfectly symmetric.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6? Let's map. Example1 Input grid 6x6: Row1: O O O O O O Row2: O O O Y Y O Row3: O O O Y Y O Row4: M O O O O O Row5: M M O O O O Row6: O O O O O O Output is 3x3: Y Y Y Y M Y Y Y Y Interpretation: Count occurrences of each color in input? Let's count: O many, Y 4? Actually Y appears at (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5) =4. M appears at (4,1),(5,1),(5,2) =3. Others O many. So most plentiful is O, then Y, then M? But output shows outer border Y, center M. So most plentiful flower forms outer border? Wait description: "most plentiful flower forms the outer border, the next most plentiful the next ring inward, until the rarest single bloom is the centerpiece." In output, outer border is Y, inner is M, center? 3x3 center is M? Actually center cell is M (row2 col2). So outer border Y, inner (center) M. That suggests Y is most plentiful, M next, and maybe O is rarest? But O is most abundant in input. So maybe they consider only colors that appear in groups (clusters) not background? Perhaps O is background and ignored. The groups of seeds are colored differently (non-background). So we consider only non-O colors. In input, Y count 4, M count 3. So Y more than M, so Y outer, M inner. That matches. Thus rule: Identify distinct non-background colors (maybe the most common non-background color becomes outermost ring, next most common becomes next inner ring, etc.) Output is a square grid whose size equals number of distinct colors *2 -1? For 2 colors we got 3x3 (outer ring width 1). For n colors, output size = 2n-1 (concentric rings). Each ring one cell thick, filled with that color. The innermost cell is the rarest color (if odd number). If there are more than 2 colors, we would have multiple rings. Now test input: need to count non-O colors? Let's list colors present: O (background), W, R, X, A, B, . (black). Also maybe others? Let's parse grid 8x8. I'll write coordinates. Row1: O O W O O R R R Row2: O O W O O R O R Row3: X O O O O O O O Row4: X X O A O O O O Row5: X O O O O . O O Row6: O O B O O . . O Row7: O B B B O O . . Row8: B B B B B O O . We need to count each non-O color (excluding O). Let's tally. Initialize counts. W: appears row1 col3, row2 col3 => 2. R: row1 col6,7,8? Actually row1 col6=R, col7=R, col8=R => three Rs. Row2 col6=R, col8=R => two more. Row2 col7 is O. So total R =5. X: row3 col1, row4 col1, row4 col2, row5 col1 => 4 Xs. A: row4 col4 = A => 1. . (black): row5 col6 = ., row6 col6 = ., row6 col7 = ., row7 col7 = ., row7 col8 = ., row8 col8 = . => count? Let's list: row5 col6 (1), row6 col6 (2), row6 col7 (3), row7 col7 (4), row7 col8 (5), row8 col8 (6). Also any other '.'? row8 col? row8 col8 is ., yes. So total 6. B: row6 col3 = B, row7 col2,3,4 = B B B, row8 col1-5 = B B B B B => count: row6 col3 (1), row7 col2 (2), col3 (3), col4 (4), row8 col1 (5), col2 (6), col3 (7), col4 (8), col5 (9). Also row6 maybe other B? row6 col? row6 col? row6 col? row6 col? row6 ... [5561 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains three key elements on a black background: (1) a red line (R) — either horizontal or vertical — that spans the full width or height of the grid, acting as a fixed wall; (2) a green shape (G) — an irregular connected figure made of green cells; and (3) empty black space between and around them. The green shape is separated from the red line by one or more rows/columns of empty space, positioned somewhere on the opposite side of the red line from the nearest edge.
Do: 1. Identify the red line and its orientation (horizontal or vertical). 2. Identify the green shape and note its bounding box and internal pattern. 3. Slide the entire green shape along the axis perpendicular to the red line, moving it toward the red line, until the green shape is directly adjacent to the red line (no gap remains between them). 4. Remove the green shape from its original position (replace with black). 5. Place a solid azure (A) line on the far side of the green shape — that is, on the edge of the green shape's bounding box opposite the red line. The azure line runs parallel to the red line and spans exactly the same length as the red line (full row or full column width). The azure line occupies the single row or column immediately after the green shape's bounding box, on the side away from the red line. 6. All other cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid dimensions vary across instances (can be rectangular in either orientation). The background is black (.). The red line always spans the full width of the grid (if horizontal) or the full height (if vertical), occupying exactly one row or column. The green shape fits entirely on one side of the red line. The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid.
"A moth is drawn to a flame, leaving a shadow on the wall where it finally rests."
120b: k=1
See: In the darkness, a red ember glows — a bright, unbroken line of heat stretching from edge to edge. Somewhere in the void, a green moth flutters, its irregular wings catching no light. Between the moth and the ember lies empty night.
Do: The moth cannot resist the warmth. It drifts through the darkness toward the red ember, crossing all the empty space until it presses its body right against the glowing line. Where the moth once hovered, only darkness remains — no trace of its departure. But the journey leaves a mark: an azure shadow crystallizes along the moth's trailing edge, a cool afterimage the exact length of the ember, as if the night itself remembers the last place the moth paused before surrendering to the heat.
Grid: The void (black) can stretch in any direction. The ember (red) is an unbroken line of fire spanning the full breadth of the world. The moth (green) is an irregular living shape that always begins on one side of the ember. The shadow (azure) is born only after the moth completes its journey.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid is 16 rows? Let's count. Example input shows many rows: appears 16 rows? Actually list: rows from top: first row ". . . . ." (5 columns). Then many rows until row with "R R R R R". So grid height maybe 16? Let's count rows: I'll enumerate: 1 . . . . . 2 G G . . . 3 G . . . . 4 G G . G G 5 . G G G . 6 . . . . . 7 . . . . . 8 . . . . . 9 . . . . . 10 . . . . . 11 . . . . . 12 . . . . . 13 . . . . . 14 . . . . . 15 . . . . . 16 R R R R R 17 . . . . . Actually there are 17 rows? Wait after row 16 with R line, there is row 17 ". . . . .". So total 17 rows, 5 columns. Output grid: also 17 rows, 5 columns. Let's list output rows: 1 . . . . . 2 . . . . . 3 . . . . . 4 . . . . . 5 . . . . . 6 . . . . . 7 . . . . . 8 . . . . . 9 . . . . . 10 . . . . . 11 A A A A A 12 G G . . . 13 G . . . . 14 G G . G G 15 . G G G . 16 R R R R R 17 . . . . . So transformation: The red line (R) is at row 16 originally, spanning full width. In output, red line stays same row 16 unchanged. The green shape originally appears in rows 2-5 (some shape). In output, the green shape moved down to rows 12-15? Actually output rows 12-15 contain the same pattern as original rows 2-5. Indeed row 12: G G . . . matches original row2. Row13: G . . . . matches original row3. Row14: G G . G G matches original row4. Row15: . G G G . matches original row5. So the green shape moved down to just above the red line, with one row of A (azure) inserted between them? Actually there is row 11 with A A A A A (azure line) exactly same length as red line, placed directly above the green shape? Wait order: In output, from top: rows 1-10 empty, row11 azure line, rows12-15 green shape, row16 red line, row17 empty. In input, green shape was at top (rows2-5), red line at row16, empty rows elsewhere. So transformation: Move green shape down until it is directly above red line, leaving exactly one row of azure (A) between green shape and red line? Actually azure line appears above green shape, not between green and red. Let's examine description: Moth (green) moves towards ember (red) crossing empty space until it presses its body right against the glowing line. Where the moth once hovered, only darkness remains. But the journey leaves a mark: an azure shadow crystallizes along the moth's trailing edge, a cool afterimage the exact length of the ember, as if the night itself remembers the last place the moth paused before surrendering to the heat. Interpretation: The green shape moves downwards (assuming ember is horizontal line). It ends up adjacent to red line (touching). The original location of green becomes empty (black). The azure line appears at the previous location of the green shape's trailing edge? Actually "azure shadow crystallizes along the moth's trailing edge, a cool afterimage the exact length of the ember". The trailing edge is the side opposite direction of movement? If moving downwards, trailing edge is top side of green shape. So azure li ... [7974 chars truncated]
"A cell migrates toward the membrane wall, and a cytoskeletal filament crystallizes along its trailing edge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A membrane barrier stretches across the organism, while a free-floating cell drifts in the cytoplasm nearby.
Do: The cell crawls toward the membrane until it presses flush against it, vacating its old position. A rigid filament forms along the cell's far surface, sealing it in place.
Grid: The membrane is a red line spanning the full width or height. The cell is the green shape. Black is cytoplasm. The filament is an azure line matching the membrane's span.
"A nebula drifts toward the accretion disk and settles against it, while a shock front forms on its outer boundary."
120b: k=3
See: An accretion disk stretches across the field of view. A nebula floats in the void some distance away.
Do: The nebula migrates toward the disk until contact. A shock front appears on the nebula's far edge, extending the full span of the field.
Grid: The accretion disk is red. The nebula is green. Empty space is black. The shock front is azure.
We need to infer rule. From description: accretion disk = red (R) horizontal line? Nebula = green (G) shape. Shock front = azure (A) appears on nebula's far edge extending full span of field after moving nebula towards disk until contact. Look at examples. Example1: Input grid 16 rows? Let's count: appears 16 rows? Actually list: rows: first line ". . . . ." (5 columns). Then many rows. At bottom row "R R R R R". So red line at row 16 (index maybe 15). Green shape above (some cluster). Output: The red line moved up? Let's compare. Input rows (I'll index 1-16): 1 . . . . . 2 G G . . . 3 G . . . . 4 G G . G G 5 . G G G . 6 . . . . . 7 . . . . . 8 . . . . . 9 . . . . . 10 . . . . . 11 . . . . . 12 . . . . . 13 . . . . . 14 . . . . . 15 . . . . . 16 R R R R R 17 . . . . . (actually there is row 17? Wait they show after R row, then ". . . . .". So total 17 rows? Let's recount: Input list shows after R row, then ". . . . .". So maybe 17 rows. Output shows similar but with A row inserted at row 11? Let's examine output rows: Output rows: 1 . . . . . 2 . . . . . 3 . . . . . 4 . . . . . 5 . . . . . 6 . . . . . 7 . . . . . 8 . . . . . 9 . . . . . 10 . . . . . 11 A A A A A 12 G G . . . 13 G . . . . 14 G G . G G 15 . G G G . 16 R R R R R 17 . . . . . So transformation: The green shape moved down to just below the A row, which is placed above it. The red line stayed same row (16). The A row appears at row 11, which is exactly halfway between original green top and red? Let's compute original green shape occupied rows 2-5. Red at row 16. The distance between bottom of green (row5) and red (row16) is 11 rows gap (rows6-15). In output, green moved down to rows12-15 (same shape). A row placed at row11, i.e., just above green after moving. So the nebula (green) migrated towards the disk (red) until contact? Actually they didn't contact; there is still one row gap? Wait after moving, green now rows12-15, red row16, they are adjacent (green bottom row15, red row16). So they are in contact (touching). The shock front (A) appears on nebula's far edge (the side opposite the disk) extending full span. Since nebula moved downwards towards red (disk at bottom), the far edge is the top side of nebula. So A row placed above the nebula (row11) spanning full width. That matches. Thus rule: Identify red horizontal line (disk). Identify green region (nebula). Move green region vertically towards red line until it is directly adjacent (touching) without overlapping. Then fill the row (or column?) on the opposite side of the green region (far edge) with azure A, spanning entire width (or height) of grid, placed adjacent to the nebula on that far side. Check Example2: Input 4 rows, 16 columns? Let's view. Rows: 1 ". G . . . . . . . . R . . . . ." 2 ". G G G . . . . . . R . . . . ." 3 "G G . . . . . . . . R . . . . ." 4 ". G G G . . . . . . R . . . . ." So red line is vertical? Actually there is a column of R at column 11 (0-index?). It's a vertical line of R across all ro ... [8397 chars truncated]
"A raft drifts toward the reef line on the current, and a wake mark traces where the raft finally lodged."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A reef line crosses the entire channel. A raft floats somewhere in the open water.
Do: The current carries the raft to the reef until it lodges against it. A wake line forms on the raft's seaward edge, spanning the full width of the channel.
Grid: The reef is red. The raft is green. Open water is black. The wake line is azure.
"A component slides along the PCB traces until it seats against the bus bar, and a solder bridge forms on its far lead."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A bus bar runs across the full width of the circuit board. A component sits unsoldered elsewhere on the board.
Do: Slide the component until its pins contact the bus bar. A solder bridge forms along the component's opposite edge, spanning the board's full width.
Grid: The bus bar is red. The component is green. Bare board is black. The solder bridge is azure.
"A wandering spirit is summoned to the threshold of the underworld, and a seal is inscribed behind it so it cannot return."
120b: k=1
See: A threshold stretches across the boundary between realms. A spirit roams in the mortal plane.
Do: The spirit is drawn to the threshold until it stands at the gate. A binding seal is inscribed across the spirit's mortal-side edge, spanning the full boundary.
Grid: The threshold is red. The spirit is green. The void is black. The seal is azure.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid is 16 rows? Let's count. Example input shows many rows: first block of rows with G and . then many rows of . then a row of R then . row. Output shows shift: The A row appears where? In output, rows 1-10 are all . rows, row 11 is A A A A A, then rows 12-15 are the original G pattern, row 16 is R row, row 17 is . row? Wait count. Let's enumerate example input rows (I'll index): 1: . . . . . 2: G G . . . 3: G . . . . 4: G G . G G 5: . G G G . 6: . . . . . 7: . . . . . 8: . . . . . 9: . . . . . 10: . . . . . 11: . . . . . 12: . . . . . 13: . . . . . 14: . . . . . 15: . . . . . 16: R R R R R 17: . . . . . So 17 rows, 5 columns. Output rows: 1: . . . . . 2: . . . . . 3: . . . . . 4: . . . . . 5: . . . . . 6: . . . . . 7: . . . . . 8: . . . . . 9: . . . . . 10: . . . . . 11: A A A A A 12: G G . . . 13: G . . . . 14: G G . G G 15: . G G G . 16: R R R R R 17: . . . . . So the original G block (rows2-5) moved down to rows12-15 (shifted down by 10 rows). The R row (row16) stayed same row index? Actually originally row16 is R row, output row16 also R row (same). The A row inserted at row11 (just above the G block). So rule: Insert a row of azure (A) across the full boundary (threshold) spanning the full boundary between realms. The threshold is red (R). The spirit is green (G). The void is black (.). The seal is azure (A). The description: "spirit drawn to threshold until it stands at the gate. A binding seal is inscribed across the spirit's mortal-side edge, spanning the full boundary." Interpretation: The red row is threshold. The green region is spirit located above threshold? In input, green block is above red row (rows2-5 above row16). The spirit moves down until it stands at the gate (adjacent to red row). Then a seal (A) is placed across the spirit's mortal-side edge, spanning the full boundary (i.e., a row of A directly above the red row, covering entire width). Also the spirit (green) is shifted down to be just above the seal? Actually after transformation, green block is directly below the A row (rows12-15) and above red row (row16). So green block moved down to be adjacent to red row, with A row inserted between them? Wait order: A row at row11, then G rows 12-15, then R row 16. So G is below A, not above. In description: spirit drawn to threshold until it stands at the gate (i.e., adjacent to threshold). Then seal is inscribed across spirit's mortal-side edge, spanning full boundary. Mortal-side edge likely the side opposite threshold? If spirit is above threshold, mortal side is the side away from threshold (top). So seal placed across that edge (top edge of spirit) spanning full width. That matches: A row placed above the G block (i.e., at its top edge). Indeed A row is above G block (row11) and G block rows12-15, then R row16. So the seal is placed on the side of spirit opposite threshold (the "mortal side"). Thus transformation: Identify red row(s) (threshold). Identify green region (spir ... [7446 chars truncated]
"A dancer glides across the floor to the barre, and a chalk mark is swept behind their final position."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A barre runs along the full length of the studio. A dancer stands somewhere on the open floor.
Do: The dancer glides toward the barre and stops against it. A chalk line appears on the floor behind the dancer's back, running the barre's full length.
Grid: The barre is red. The dancer is green. Open floor is black. The chalk line is azure.
"A tectonic plate subducts toward the trench, and a volcanic arc erupts along its trailing margin."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A deep-ocean trench cuts across the full extent of the crust. A tectonic plate sits some distance away.
Do: The plate slides toward the trench until it meets the boundary. A volcanic arc forms on the plate's far edge, running the full width of the crust.
Grid: The trench is red. The plate is green. Empty crust is black. The volcanic arc is azure.
"An ingredient slides down the cutting board toward the knife's edge, and a garnish line marks where it came to rest."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blade lies fixed across the board. A morsel sits some distance away on the same surface.
Do: Push the morsel along the board until it meets the blade. A decorative drizzle appears on the morsel's far side, parallel to the blade and just as wide.
Grid: The blade is a red line. The morsel is green. The board is black. The drizzle is azure.
"A wandering phrase resolves to the bar line, and a sustain pedal marking appears beneath it."
120b: k=2
See: A bar line stretches across the staff. A musical phrase floats several measures away.
Do: The phrase drifts toward the bar line until it sits directly against it. A pedal marking materializes on the phrase's far edge, spanning the full width of the staff.
Grid: The bar line is red. The phrase is green. Empty staff is black. The pedal marking is azure.
We need to infer rule. From description: bar line is red vertical line across staff (maybe column). Phrase is green shape somewhere to right of bar line. Need to shift phrase left until it touches bar line, then add azure (A) pedal marking on phrase's far edge spanning full width of staff (i.e., a row of A's at the far side of phrase after shift? Let's examine examples. Example1 input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 16 rows? Actually list: lines: 1 . . . . . 2 G G . . . 3 G . . . . 4 G G . G G 5 . G G G . 6 . . . . . 7 . . . . . 8 . . . . . 9 . . . . . 10 . . . . . 11 . . . . . 12 . . . . . 13 . . . . . 14 . . . . . 15 . . . . . 16 R R R R R 17 . . . . . So 17 rows, 5 columns. Red bar line is row 16? Actually red line is horizontal? In description bar line stretches across staff (horizontal). So red row across entire width. Indeed row 16 is all R. Green phrase is above it, some shape. Output: rows shifted down? Let's see output rows: same size 17 rows. Output rows: first 10 rows all . . . . . (same as input rows 1-10). Row 11: A A A A A (azure across full width). Row 12-15: same as original green rows 2-5? Let's map: Output row12: G G . . . (matches input row2). Row13: G . . . . (input row3). Row14: G G . G G (input row4). Row15: . G G G . (input row5). Row16: R R R R R (same). Row17: . . . . . (same as input row17). So transformation: moved green phrase down until it sits directly above red line? Actually originally green phrase rows 2-5, with a gap of many empty rows between them and red line at row16. In output, green phrase moved down to rows12-15, i.e., directly above red line (row16) with no empty rows between? Indeed there is exactly one row of A (azure) between green phrase and red line? Wait row11 is A's, then green phrase rows12-15, then red line row16. In description: phrase drifts toward bar line until it sits directly against it. A pedal marking materializes on the phrase's far edge, spanning full width of staff. In example, phrase moved down until its bottom edge touches red line? Actually phrase's far edge (the side opposite bar line) gets A row. Since bar line is red horizontal line, phrase is above it, moving downwards until its bottom touches red line? But they added A row on phrase's far edge (the side away from bar line). Since bar line is below phrase after moving? Wait phrase moves towards bar line (downwards) until sits directly against it (i.e., its bottom row adjacent to red line). Then pedal marking appears on phrase's far edge (the opposite side, i.e., top edge) spanning full width. Indeed A row appears above the phrase (row11) spanning full width. So rule: shift the green shape vertically towards the red line until it is directly adjacent (touching) the red line, preserving orientation. Then add a row of azure (A) on the opposite side of the shape (i.e., on the side away from red line), covering full width of grid. Check Example2: Input grid 4 rows, 16 columns? Let's count columns: ". G . . . . . . . . R . . . ... [9810 chars truncated]
"A formation charges the goal line, and the referee paints a new offside marker behind them."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A goal line crosses the entire field. A team formation is positioned elsewhere on the pitch.
Do: The formation advances until it reaches the goal line. An offside line is drawn across the field just behind the formation's trailing edge.
Grid: The goal line is red. The formation is green. The pitch is black. The offside line is azure.
"A cloud bank drifts toward the front and compresses against it, leaving a dew line in its wake."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A weather front stretches across the sky. A cloud formation hovers at a distance.
Do: The cloud bank slides toward the front until they touch. A condensation line appears along the cloud's far edge, matching the front's full extent.
Grid: The front is red. The cloud bank is green. Clear sky is black. The dew line is azure.
"A facade module is slid along its rail until it clicks against the bearing wall, and a flashing strip is installed on the exposed edge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A load-bearing wall spans the full width of the structure. A modular facade section sits elsewhere in the frame.
Do: Slide the module toward the wall until it abuts. Install a flashing strip on the module's outward-facing edge, running the full span of the structure.
Grid: The bearing wall is red. The facade module is green. Empty frame is black. The flashing strip is azure.
"A regiment advances to the fortification wall, and a supply line is established at their rear."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A fortification wall stretches across the battlefield. A regiment is encamped at some distance.
Do: March the regiment forward until it is pressed against the wall. A supply line is drawn behind the regiment's rearmost rank, spanning the full width of the field.
Grid: The wall is red. The regiment is green. Open ground is black. The supply line is azure.
"An actor crosses the stage to the footlights, and a spotlight bar illuminates the space just behind them."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A row of footlights runs across the stage. A performer stands somewhere in the wings or upstage.
Do: The performer walks to the footlights and stops just in front of them. A spotlight bar activates along the performer's upstage edge, spanning the full width of the stage.
Grid: Footlights are red. The performer is green. Dark stage is black. The spotlight bar is azure.
"A topiary is transplanted next to the garden wall, and an irrigation line is laid along its outer roots."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A garden wall runs the full length of the plot. A topiary grows somewhere in the garden bed.
Do: Uproot the topiary and replant it flush against the wall. Lay an irrigation pipe on the topiary's far side, running the entire length of the plot.
Grid: The wall is red. The topiary is green. Bare soil is black. The irrigation line is azure.
See: The input is a grid where the top row contains some number N of colored cells (all the same color) packed to the left, followed by black cells. All remaining rows below are entirely black. The grid has width W and a variable number of rows.
Do: 1. Count N, the number of colored cells in the top row. Note the color C and the grid width W. 2. Generate a linear sequence of cells by producing runs of C-colored cells with lengths 1, 2, 3, ..., N, ..., 3, 2, 1 (ascending from 1 to N, then descending back to 1). Separate each consecutive pair of runs with exactly one black cell. 3. If the total length of this sequence is not a multiple of W, pad the end with black cells until it is. 4. Wrap this linear sequence into rows of width W. The resulting rows form the output grid.
Grid: The output grid has the same width W as the input. The number of output rows equals the total padded sequence length divided by W. The background color is black (.). Only one non-black color appears, matching the color from the input's first row.
"A heartbeat grows louder, peaks, then fades — and the EKG paper scrolls it across the page."
120b: k=3
See: A row of colored pulses sits at the top of a dark monitor, like an initial charge of energy. Below stretches silence — a flatline of black.
Do: The pulse begins to beat. It starts faint — a single colored blip — then each successive beat grows one pulse stronger: tap, tap-tap, tap-tap-tap, building up to the full strength shown in that first row. At its peak the heartbeat holds, then winds back down symmetrically — each beat losing one pulse until it fades to a single blip again. Between every heartbeat, one moment of silence (a black cell) separates the rhythm. This entire cardiac rhythm is recorded onto the EKG tape.
Grid: The EKG tape is exactly as wide as the monitor. The rhythm is printed left to right, and when the tape reaches the right edge it scrolls to the next line. If the last line has leftover space after the final heartbeat fades, the tape fills with flatline silence to the edge.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have input grid with top row containing a sequence of colored cells (same color) then blanks (.) rest of row. Rest rows are empty (all .). Output shows a pattern of that color arranged in a "heartbeat" pattern across rows, like a triangular wave. Let's analyze Example1. Input top row: G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G then 5 .) width 11? Actually count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns. Input grid 9 rows? Actually given 9 rows of . after top row. Output grid appears 5 rows? Let's count output rows: they show 5 rows. Output rows: Row0: G . G G . G G G . G G Row1: G G . G G G G G . G G Row2: G G G G . G G G G G . Row3: G G G G . G G G . G G Row4: . G . . . . . . . . . So output width same as input width (11). Height seems 5 rows (maybe number of beats?). The pattern: looks like a "pulse" moving downwards? Let's map positions. Let's index columns 0-10. Row0: G . G G . G G G . G G Positions with G: 0,2,3,5,6,7,9,10 (8 cells). Row1: G G . G G G G G . G G => positions 0,1,3,4,5,6,7,9,10 (9 cells). Row2: G G G G . G G G G G . => positions 0,1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9 (9 cells). Row3: G G G G . G G G . G G => positions 0,1,2,3,5,6,7,9,10 (9 cells). Row4: . G . . . . . . . . . => position 1 only. Seems like a pattern of a "heartbeat" shape: start with single G at column 1? Actually bottom row row4 has a single G at column1 (maybe the final single blip). The top row row0 has pattern starting with G at column0 then blank then two G etc. Let's think of the metaphor: top row is initial pulse row (full strength). The rhythm is printed left to right, with each beat consisting of increasing number of pulses (colored cells) from 1 up to full length (the number of colored cells in top row?), then decreasing back to 1, with a black cell separating beats. The output grid is like a raster of this sequence across rows, wrapping to next line when reaching edge. Essentially we need to generate a 1D sequence of colors and blanks (black) representing the heartbeat pattern, then fill into grid rows left to right, top to bottom, with width equal to input width. The input provides the "full strength" pattern: a contiguous block of colored cells (maybe length N) at the start of the top row, rest blanks. That defines the color and the length of the full pulse (max number of colored cells in a beat). The beats are built by starting with 1 colored cell, then 2, then 3, ... up to N, then N-1,... down to 1. Between each beat, there is a single black cell (.) as separator. The pattern repeats? The description says "the entire cardiac rhythm is recorded onto the EKG tape." Probably just one full cycle (up and down) maybe? Let's test with Example1: N = 6 (since 6 G). So beats lengths: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1. That's 11 beats. Between each beat, a black cell separator, so total cells = sum of lengths + (number of beats -1) separators? Actually separators between beats, not after last? So total cells = (1+2+...+ ... [8444 chars truncated]
"A single cell divides with increasing vigor — each generation larger than the last — until it reaches its peak vitality, then senescence sets in and each division yields fewer and fewer daughters, the whole colony recorded on a microscope slide that scrolls left to right."
120b: k=2
See: A seed colony sits at the top of a petri dish, its population count visible. The rest of the dish is empty growth medium.
Do: The colony pulses outward in waves of increasing then decreasing size, each wave separated by a thin membrane of empty medium. The culture log is read across the slide row by row.
Grid: The dish keeps its width. Colored cells are living organisms; black cells are empty medium. The culture wraps onto as many rows as it needs.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colored cells at top row (seed colony) and rest empty (black .). Output shows pattern of colored cells forming waves with empty separators. Example1: Input top row: G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G then 5 .). Output grid size? Let's count rows: output shows 5 rows (since last row ". G . . . . . . . . .") Actually output lines: 1: G . G G . G G G . G G 2: G G . G G G G G . G G 3: G G G G . G G G G G . 4: G G G G . G G G . G G 5: . G . . . . . . . . . So 5 rows, each length? Count columns: row1: G . G G . G G G . G G = 11 columns. Input had 11 columns (6 G +5 .). So width unchanged. Height increased from 1 to 5 rows (wrap as needed). The pattern seems like a "pulse" of G cells expanding then contracting, with empty columns as separators (thin membrane). The seed count is 6 (number of G in first row). Output seems to have a pattern of G cells arranged in a diagonal wave? Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 0-10. Input top row G at 0-5. Output rows: Row0: col0 G,1 .,2 G,3 G,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 .,9 G,10 G Row1: 0 G,1 G,2 .,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 .,9 G,10 G Row2: 0 G,1 G,2 G,3 G,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 . Row3: 0 G,1 G,2 G,3 G,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 .,9 G,10 G Row4: 0 .,1 G,2 ., rest . (all .) Interesting pattern: seems like a "triangular" shape of G expanding outward from leftmost column? Actually G appears in many columns. Maybe rule: take the initial contiguous block of colored cells (seed) length N. Then generate a pattern of N rows (or maybe N+? ) where each row is a shifted version of the seed with a moving empty column (membrane) that moves right each row? Let's examine. Seed length 6. Output rows 5 (maybe N-1?). Row0 has G at columns 0,2,3,5,6,7,9,10 (8 G). Row1 has G at 0,1,3,4,5,6,7,9,10 (9 G). Row2 has G at 0,1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9 (9 G). Row3 similar to row1. Row4 only G at column1. Pattern symmetrical? Looks like a "pulse" where a block of G expands outward then contracts, with a single column of . separating pulses. Maybe it's like taking the seed count N and creating a pattern of N rows where each row has N G's arranged in a diagonal line? Not matching. Let's examine Example2. Input: first row: B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4 B then many .). Output rows? Provided 1 row? Actually output shows a single line? Let's count: Output line: "B . B B . B B B . B B B B . B B B . B B . B .". That's one row? Wait there are spaces between characters. It seems output is a single row (maybe multiple rows but they collapsed). Let's count columns: Let's parse: B . B B . B B B . B B B B . B B B . B B . B . That's 22? Let's count: 1 B,2 .,3 B,4 B,5 .,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 .,10 B,11 B,12 B,13 B,14 .,15 B,16 B,17 B,18 .,19 B,20 B,21 .,22 B,23 . . Actually there are 23 entries maybe. Input width? Input row length: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's 4 B + many . total maybe 24? Let's count: there are 4 B then 20 .? Actually count: after B B B B there are 20 '.'? Let's count ... [9081 chars truncated]
"A pulsar emits bursts of light — a single flash, then a double, then a triple — each burst longer as it charges, peaking at full power, then winding down symmetrically. A moment of void separates each burst, and the signal is captured on a detector array of fixed width."
120b: k=1
See: A star cluster glows along the top of the detector. The array below reads only darkness.
Do: Record light bursts ascending from 1 to the cluster count, then descending. A single dark cell separates each burst. Wrap the signal across the detector's width.
Grid: Photons match the cluster color; void is black. Detector width is unchanged. Rows accumulate as data streams in.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid: first row has G G G G G G . . . . . (6 greens then 5 blanks). Rest rows empty. Output is 5 rows? Actually output shown 5 rows, each with 11 columns? Let's count: first output row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 cells. Input width 11. Height input 9? Actually input had 9 rows? Provided 9 rows of 11 columns? Input shows 9 rows (first row with G's, then 8 rows of all .). Output has 5 rows (maybe height reduced?). Let's examine pattern. Interpretation: "star cluster glows along the top of the detector" => top row has cluster of same color (G). "Record light bursts ascending from 1 to the cluster count, then descending. A single dark cell separates each burst. Wrap the signal across the detector's width. Rows accumulate as data streams in." So we need to produce rows representing bursts of increasing length from 1 up to cluster count (6) then descending back to 1? With single dark cell separator between bursts. Wrap across width. Let's test: cluster count = number of colored cells in top row = 6 (greens). So we need bursts of length 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1? That's 11 bursts. Each burst is a sequence of the cluster color (G) of that length, separated by a single dark cell (.) between bursts. Wrap across width meaning we fill rows left to right, moving to next row when exceed width. Let's generate linear sequence: start with length1 G, then . separator, length2 GG, ., length3 GGG, ., length4 GGGG, ., length5 GGGGG, ., length6 GGGGGG, ., length5 GGGGG, ., length4 GGGG, ., length3 GGG, ., length2 GG, ., length1 G. That's bursts count 11, each separated by a dot. After last burst maybe no trailing dot? Not sure. In example output first row: G . G G . G G G . G G .? Wait actual first row: "G . G G . G G G . G G". That's 11 cells. Let's map sequence: positions: 1 G (len1) 2 . separator 3 G (start len2) 4 G (len2 second) 5 . separator 6 G (len3 start) 7 G 8 G (len3 end) 9 . separator 10 G (len4 start) 11 G (len4 second) But we need more cells for len4 third and fourth etc. However row ends at column 11, so continues to next row. Let's write full linear sequence as characters (G and .) for bursts up to len6 then descending, without trailing dot after final burst. Let's compute. We'll generate list: burst lengths: [1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1] separator '.' between bursts, not after last. So sequence: for each length L: add L times G, then if not last burst add '.'. Let's produce: len1: G sep . len2: GG sep . len3: GGG sep . len4: GGGG sep . len5: GGGGG sep . len6: GGGGGG sep . len5: GGGGG sep . len4: GGGG sep . len3: GGG sep . len2: GG sep . len1: G (last, no sep) Now concatenate. Let's write as string: G . GG . GGG . GGGG . GGGGG . GGGGGG . GGGGG . GGGG . GGG . GG . G Now count characters: compute lengths. G (1) . (2) GG (4) . (5) GGG (8) . (9) GGGG (13) . (14) GGGGG (19) . (20) GGGGGG (26) . (27) GGGGG (32) . (33) GGGG (37) . (38) GGG (41) . (42) GG (44) . (45) G (46) Total 46 characters. Now widt ... [7718 chars truncated]
"Waves roll in with increasing crests — a single ripple, then a swell of two, then three — building to a rogue wave matching the fleet's count, then receding symmetrically. A trough of still water separates each wave, and the captain's log wraps across pages as wide as the horizon."
120b: fail
See: A fleet of vessels lines the horizon at the top of the chart. The sea below is flat and dark.
Do: Record swells of increasing then decreasing length, from 1 to fleet size and back. A single trough separates each. Wrap the log across the chart's horizon width.
Grid: Crests match the fleet color; troughs are black. Chart width equals the horizon. Rows fill as the log continues.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. We have input grid with top row containing a sequence of same color (fleet) then blanks (black .). Rest rows empty (all .). Output shows pattern of that color arranged in some wave pattern across rows, with black troughs separating groups. Interpretation: "Record swells of increasing then decreasing length, from 1 to fleet size and back. A single trough separates each. Wrap the log across the chart's horizon width." So we have to create a pattern of the fleet color (same as input top row) across the grid, forming a series of "crests" of lengths 1,2,3,...,N,...,2,1 where N is fleet size? Actually fleet size is number of colored cells in top row? Example1: Input top row: G G G G G G (6 greens) then . . . . . (5 blanks) total width 11? Actually given: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns. So fleet size =6. Output grid appears to have 5 rows? Let's examine output rows count: they show 5 rows. Output pattern: rows 1-5. Let's reconstruct output matrix for example1 (5 rows, 11 columns). Row1: "G . G G . G G G . G G" Row2: "G G . G G G G G . G G" Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." Interesting. Seems like they are writing a "log" that wraps horizontally across width, moving down rows as needed. The pattern of crests (colored cells) and troughs (black .) forms a wave of increasing then decreasing length. Let's think of a 1D sequence of colors and blacks: start with length 1 of color, then 1 black, then length 2 color, then 1 black, then length 3 color, etc up to fleet size (6), then decreasing lengths 5,4,3,2,1? But they said "from 1 to fleet size and back". So sequence of crest lengths: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1. Between each crest a single trough (black). So the 1D pattern would be: G (1), . (1), GG (2), . , GGG (3), . , GGGG (4), . , GGGGG (5), . , GGGGGG (6), . , GGGGG (5), . , GGGG (4), . , GGG (3), . , GG (2), . , G (1). That's total length sum of crests + troughs. Let's compute total cells: sum of crest lengths = 1+2+3+4+5+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 36. Number of troughs = number of crests -1 = 11-1=10. Total = 46 cells. Now the grid width is 11 columns, rows maybe enough to accommodate 46 cells when wrapped row-wise left to right, top to bottom? Let's see: 46 cells across width 11 => rows needed = ceil(46/11)=5 (since 5*11=55). Indeed output has 5 rows. The pattern is placed row by row, left to right, top to bottom, filling cells with the sequence. The remaining cells after 46 are left as . (black). In example1, row5 after some cells maybe leftover . . . etc. Let's test: generate sequence of 46 cells as described, fill 5x11 grid row-major. Let's simulate quickly mentally to see if matches output. Create sequence: I'll write as groups. 1: G 2: . 3-4: G G 5: . 6-8: G G G 9: . 10-13: G G G G 14: . 15-19: G G G G G 20: . 21-26: G G G G G G 27: . 28-32: G G G G G (5) 33: . 34-37: G G G G (4) 38: . 39-41: G G G (3) 42: . 43-44: G G (2) 45: . 46: G (1) Now w ... [8048 chars truncated]
"A signal generator outputs pulses of increasing duration — one tick, then two, then three — ramping up to maximum duty cycle and then ramping back down. A single clock-low separates each pulse train, and the oscilloscope trace wraps at a fixed sweep width."
120b: k=2
See: A voltage header is high across the top of the scope display. The trace below is flatlined.
Do: Generate pulse trains of widths 1 to the header count, then back to 1, each separated by one low tick. Wrap the trace at the sweep width.
Grid: High voltage is the header color; low is black. Sweep width matches the display. Rows stack as the trace wraps.
We need to understand puzzle. Metaphor: voltage header high across top of scope display, trace flatlined. Generate pulse trains of widths 1 to header count, then back to 1, each separated by one low tick. Wrap trace at sweep width. Rows stack as trace wraps. Interpretation: Input grid: top row contains header colors (non-black). The rest rows are black. The header count = number of columns where top row is non-black? In examples. Example1 Input: top row: G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G then 5 .). So header count = 6? Output grid is 5 rows? Actually output shows 5 rows (maybe same as input rows count?). Input had 9 rows? Let's count: Input example1 had 9 rows (first row with Gs, then 8 rows of all .). Output has 5 rows. So rows reduced? Let's examine output pattern. We need to generate pulse trains of widths 1 to header count then back to 1, each separated by one low tick (black). Wrap at sweep width (display width = number of columns?). Rows stack as trace wraps. Essentially we have a 1D pattern (time) of high (header color) and low (black) across columns, representing a trace that moves horizontally across rows as it wraps. Starting at top left? The header is high across top of scope display (i.e., first row). The trace below is flatlined (i.e., low). We need to generate pulse trains of varying widths. Interpretation: We have a sequence of high pulses of lengths 1,2,3,...,N, N-1,...,1, each separated by a single low tick. This sequence is placed into a linear timeline of length equal to sweep width (number of columns). Then we map this timeline onto rows: as the trace moves across columns, when it reaches end of row, it wraps to next row (like raster scan). The high pulses are colored with header color (same as top row). The low ticks are black. Thus output grid is representation of that pattern across rows. Let's test with Example2. Example2 Input: top row: B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4 B then many .). So header count = 4? Output: single row? Output shows one row: "B . B B . B B B . B B B B . B B B . B B . B .". That's 24 columns? Let's count: maybe same as input width (24?). Input width appears 24? Actually input row length: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 24? Let's count: 4 B + 20 . =24. Output row length also 24. So output is a single row (since only one row needed to display pattern before wrap?). The pattern of pulses of widths 1..4..1 across 24 columns. Let's generate sequence: widths: 1,2,3,4,3,2,1 (then maybe repeat? but only one cycle). Each pulse separated by one low tick. So pattern: high (H) length1, low1, high length2, low1, high length3, low1, high length4, low1, high length3, low1, high length2, low1, high length1. Let's compute total length: sum of highs = 1+2+3+4+3+2+1 = 16. Number of low separators = number of pulses -1 = 7-1=6. So total = 22. But output length is 24, maybe there are extra low ticks at start or end? Let's examine output pattern: B . B B . B B B . B B B B . B B B ... [8903 chars truncated]
"A phoenix is reborn in cycles of increasing splendor — a single spark, then twin flames, then a triple blaze — building to a full conflagration matching its former glory, then fading back to embers symmetrically. A wisp of ash separates each rebirth, and the saga is inscribed across a scroll of fixed width."
120b: k=1
See: The phoenix's essence shimmers across the top of the scroll. The parchment below is dark and unmarked.
Do: Inscribe flame sequences ascending from 1 to the essence count, then descending. A single ash mark separates each. Wrap the saga across the scroll's width.
Grid: Flames match the essence color; ash and blank parchment are black. Scroll width stays fixed. Lines extend as the saga grows.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid: first row has G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G then 5 dots). Rest rows empty (dots). Output grid is 5 rows? Actually output shown 5 rows, each row length? Let's count first output row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 cells. Input width 11. Output height 5 rows (same as number of G in first row? Input had 6 G). Output pattern seems like constructing a pyramid of G with ash (dot) separators? Let's analyze. Input: top row has a contiguous block of G of length 6 starting at column1. Rest empty. Output: appears to have a pattern of G and . forming something like ascending then descending sequences separated by single . (ash). "Flame sequences ascending from 1 to the essence count, then descending. A single ash mark separates each. Wrap the saga across the scroll's width." Interpretation: essence count = number of G in top row = 6. Need to write sequences of G of lengths 1,2,3,4,5,6 then 5,4,3,2,1? Actually ascending from 1 to count then descending. Each sequence separated by a single ash (dot). Wrap across width. So we need to fill rows with these sequences horizontally, wrapping to next row when exceed width. Also ash marks are black (dot). The background also black (dot). So output rows contain G and . only. Let's test: Build a linear string of length? sequences: 1 G, dot, 2 G, dot, 3 G, dot, 4 G, dot,5 G, dot,6 G, dot,5 G, dot,4 G, dot,3 G, dot,2 G, dot,1 G. That's total G count sum = 1+2+3+4+5+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 36 G. Number of dots separators = number of sequences -1 = 11-1=10? Actually there are 11 sequences, so 10 separators. Also maybe no trailing dot after last? In output first row length 11, but we need to map onto grid width 11, height maybe enough rows to accommodate 36+10=46 cells. Input grid height 10? Actually example input had 9 rows? Let's count: Input shows 9 rows? It lists 9 lines after first row? Actually there are 9 rows of dots after first row, total 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines: first row G..., then 8 rows of dots? It shows 8 lines of ". . . . . . . . . . .". Let's count: after first row, there are 8 lines of dots (maybe 9?). The output has 5 rows. So they used only needed rows to fit pattern, maybe height is minimal to contain all cells, but they kept same width. Let's simulate filling rows left to right, top to bottom, wrapping when exceed width. Starting with first sequence length 1 G: place G at (row1,col1). Then dot separator: place . at col2. Then 2 G: col3-4 G G. Then dot at col5. Then 3 G: col6-8 G G G. Then dot at col9. Then 4 G: need columns 10-13 but width 11, so we place G at col10, G at col11, then wrap to next row col1, col2 for remaining two G. Then dot separator after sequence: after placing 4 G, we need a dot. Continue at col3 row2 place dot. Then 5 G: col4-8 row2 G G G G G. Then dot col9 row2. Then 6 G: col10-11 row2 G G, then wrap row3 col1-4 G G G G. Then dot col5 row3. Then 5 G: col6-10 row3 G G G G G. Then dot col11 row3. Then 4 G: wrap row4 col1-4 G G G G. ... [8738 chars truncated]
"Dancers join the stage in growing lines — a solo, then a duet, then a trio — each formation larger until the full corps performs, then they exit in diminishing groups. A single breath of stillness separates each formation, and the choreography chart wraps across a floor of fixed width."
120b: fail
See: The corps is poised along the top of the stage. The dance floor below is dark and still.
Do: Choreograph formations of 1 through the corps count, then back to 1. A single still moment separates each. Wrap the chart across the floor width.
Grid: Dancers are the corps color; stillness is black. Floor width matches the stage. Rows fill as the dance unfolds.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with top row filled with a color (corps) and rest black. Output shows pattern of that color arranged in some formation across rows, like a "dance" pattern. Let's examine Example1. Input: 10 columns? Let's count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11? Actually list: G G G G G G . . . . . => 11 columns. Rows: 9 rows? Input shows 9 rows (first row with G's, then 8 rows of all .). Output: also 5 rows? Let's count output rows: they show 5 rows. So output height reduced? Let's examine output rows: Row1: "G . G G . G G G . G G" Row2: "G G . G G G G G . G G" Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." So output width 11 columns same as input. Height 5 rows (maybe equal to number of G's in first row? Input first row had 6 G's then 5 .). Number of G's =6. Output rows =? 5? Not equal. Let's analyze pattern: It seems like they are creating a "triangular wave" of G's moving across rows, with a single still moment (black) separating each? The description: "Choreograph formations of 1 through the corps count, then back to 1. A single still moment separates each. Wrap the chart across the floor width." Interpretation: Starting with count 1 up to N (where N = number of corps color cells in first row?), then back down to 1, with a single black column separating each formation. Wrap across width. So we need to generate a sequence of columns where we place the color in a vertical line of length equal to count? Wait "formations of 1 through the corps count, then back to 1" maybe means we create vertical lines of length 1,2,3,...,N, then N-1,...,1 across columns, with a single column of black between each formation. Let's test with Example1: N = 6 (since 6 G's). So we expect columns: start with a column of 1 G (maybe at top row?), then a black column, then column of 2 G's, then black, then 3 G's, etc up to 6, then back down 5,4,3,2,1, each separated by a black column. Wrap across width (i.e., continue until run out of columns). The output grid height maybe equals N? Actually vertical lines of varying length placed starting from top? In output, we see many G's across rows, not just vertical lines. Let's reconstruct: Output grid 5 rows high. But N=6, height maybe N-1? Not. Let's view output as matrix. Write rows with indices (row0 top). Row0: G . G G . G G G . G G Row1: G G . G G G G G . G G Row2: G G G G . G G G G G . Row3: G G G G . G G G . G G Row4: . G . . . . . . . . . Interesting pattern: It seems like a diagonal band of G's moving rightwards each row, with gaps. Maybe the rule is to take the first row of color cells and treat them as a "corps count" = number of consecutive color cells from left before first black? In Example1, first row has 6 G then 5 . So count=6. Then we generate a pattern of that many rows? Output has 5 rows, not 6. Hmm. Let's examine Example2. Input: first row: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's 4 B then many . (t ... [7580 chars truncated]
"Sediment layers deposit in thickening strata — a single grain, then a pair, then a triple — each deposit thicker as the river floods with increasing force, peaking, then waning symmetrically. A thin band of void separates each stratum, and the core sample is read across a tray of fixed width."
120b: fail
See: A mineral vein runs along the top of the core tray. The sample below is dark, undeposited matrix.
Do: Deposit strata of thicknesses 1 through the vein width, then decreasing back. A single void band separates each. Read the core across the tray's width.
Grid: Mineral is the vein color; void and matrix are black. Tray width stays the same. Rows deepen as strata accumulate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid: first row has G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G then 5 .). Rest rows all . (empty). Output grid is 5 rows? Actually output shown 5 rows, each with 11 columns? Let's count: first output row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 entries. Input width 11. Output height 5 rows (same as number of rows with something? Input had 9 rows? Actually input had 9 rows? Let's count: Input lines: first line with G..., then 8 more lines of all . (total 9 rows). Output has 5 rows. So height reduced? The description: "Deposit strata of thicknesses 1 through the vein width, then decreasing back. A single void band separates each. Read the core across the tray's width." So we have a vein (color G) at top row across some width (6). Need to deposit strata of thicknesses 1 through the vein width (i.e., 1 to 6) then decreasing back (5,4,3,2,1). Each stratum separated by a void band (black .). So we create vertical columns? Actually output shows pattern across width: seems like building a triangle pattern of G with gaps. Let's analyze output rows (from top to bottom). Represent as columns 1-11. Row1: G . G G . G G G . G G Row2: G G . G G G G G . G G Row3: G G G G . G G G G G . Row4: G G G G . G G G . G G Row5: . G . . . . . . . . . Interesting pattern maybe derived from sliding window of thickness? Let's map positions of G in each row. Row1 positions: 1,3,4,6,7,8,10,11 (8 G) Row2: 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12? Wait width 11, but row2 shows "G G . G G G G G . G G" that's 11 entries: positions 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,11 (9 G). Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." positions 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10 (9 G). Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" positions 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,10,11 (9 G). Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." positions 2 only (1 G). Seems like a pattern of diagonal? Maybe we are constructing a "core" reading across width: we take the original vein (row of G length 6) and treat as a "vein" across top. Then we deposit strata of thicknesses 1..6 then decreasing, each separated by a void row (.) between strata. So we produce rows representing each thickness? For thickness t, we fill t consecutive rows? Not. Let's think: The vein width = number of G in first row = 6. So we need to create a pattern of G that forms a "mountain" shape across columns, with void rows between layers. The output height is 5, which equals 2*vein_width -? Actually 2*6-? 2*6-? =12. Not 5. Maybe height = vein_width -1? 6-1=5. Yes output rows = vein_width -1. That matches: 6 -> 5 rows. Pattern: For each row i from 1 to vein_width-1 (i=1..5), we place G in columns where distance from some center? Let's compute distances: maybe we are creating a "triangular" pattern where each row corresponds to a thickness layer, and we fill G in columns where the original vein had G and also within a sliding window of size i? Let's examine original vein positions: columns 1-6 are G, columns 7-11 are . (since width 11). Output rows show G beyond column 6 as well, up to column 11. So pattern expands outward. Maybe ... [12345 chars truncated]
"A chef pipes frosting in swells — a tiny dot, then a longer stroke, then longer still — building to a grand flourish before tapering back down to a final delicate point, all along a ribbon of fondant that folds back and forth across the cake."
120b: k=1
See: Ingredients are laid out along the top shelf of the pantry. The counter below is bare and waiting.
Do: Pipe successive strokes of icing, each one longer than the last until you match the number of ingredients, then shorten each stroke back down. Leave a gap of bare fondant between each stroke. Fold the ribbon to fit the counter width.
Grid: The counter is the same width as the shelf. Icing is the ingredient color; bare fondant is black. Rows multiply as the ribbon folds.
We need to infer rule from example. Input: first row has G repeated 6 then . . . . . (10 columns?). Actually input grid size: first row: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns. Then 8 more rows of all . (9 rows). Output grid appears 5 rows? Let's count output rows: lines given: 1: G . G G . G G G . G G (11 columns) 2: G G . G G G G G . G G (11) 3: G G G G . G G G G G . (11) 4: G G G G . G G G . G G (11) 5: . G . . . . . . . . . (11) So output has 5 rows. Input had 10 rows? Actually input had 9 rows after first? Let's count: they listed 9 rows of dots after first? They show 8 rows? Let's count lines: after first line, there are 8 lines of ". . . . . . . . . . .". Actually they show 8 lines? Let's count: they list rows 2-9 maybe 8 rows. So input 9 rows total. Output 5 rows. So rows reduced. Interpret metaphor: "ingredients along top shelf" = top row colored. "counter below is bare". "Pipe successive strokes of icing, each one longer than the last until you match the number of ingredients, then shorten each stroke back down. Leave a gap of bare fondant between each stroke. Fold the ribbon to fit the counter width. Grid details: The counter is the same width as the shelf. Icing is the ingredient color; bare fondant is black. Rows multiply as the ribbon folds." Seems like we take the top row colors (ingredients) and create a pattern of strokes (lines) of that color, increasing length then decreasing, with gaps of black between strokes, forming a diagonal pattern? Output shows G's forming a kind of triangle pattern with gaps. Let's analyze output pattern relative to top row of G's (6 G then 5 .). So ingredient color is G. Output uses G and . only. So we generate a pattern of G strokes of varying lengths across rows. Let's map coordinates. Represent rows 0-4 (output). Columns 0-10. Row0: G . G G . G G G . G G Row1: G G . G G G G G . G G Row2: G G G G . G G G G G . Row3: G G G G . G G G . G G Row4: . G . . . . . . . . . Looks like a diagonal band moving rightwards? Let's view as strokes: maybe each stroke is a contiguous segment of G's separated by single . gaps. Lengths increase then decrease. Row0: segments: G (len1) then gap, then GG (len2) then gap, then GGG (len3) then gap, then GG (len2) then gap? Actually row0 pattern: G . G G . G G G . G G. That's segments lengths:1,2,3,2 with . gaps between. Row1: G G . G G G G G . G G => segments lengths:2,4,2? Wait there is . after first two Gs, then 4 Gs, then . then 2 Gs. So lengths 2,4,2. Row2: G G G G . G G G G G . => segments lengths:4,5? Actually after first 4 Gs, . then 5 Gs then . (end). So lengths 4,5. Row3: G G G G . G G G . G G => lengths 4,3,2. Row4: . G . . . . . . . . . => just a single G at column1. Seems like we are creating a "ribbon" that folds: start with length1, then increase each row? Let's think of strokes as successive strokes of icing each longer than last until match number of ingredients (6), then shorten each stroke back down. Number of ingredients = count o ... [7010 chars truncated]
"A composer writes phrases of increasing length — one note, then two, then three — building to a crescendo that matches the ensemble size, then diminishing back to a solo, with rests between each phrase, all scored onto staves of fixed width."
120b: k=2
See: An ensemble of musicians sits in a row at the top of the score. The staves below are silent.
Do: Write ascending phrase lengths from 1 up to the ensemble count, then descending back to 1. Place a single rest between consecutive phrases. Flow the music across staves of the same width as the ensemble row.
Grid: Each note is the ensemble's color, each rest is silence (black). The score has as many staves as the music requires.
We need to decode the puzzle. The metaphor: ensemble of musicians sits in a row at the top of the score. The staves below are silent. Write ascending phrase lengths from 1 up to the ensemble count, then descending back to 1. Place a single rest between consecutive phrases. Flow the music across staves of the same width as the ensemble row. Each note is the ensemble's color, each rest is black. The score has as many staves as the music requires. Interpretation: Input grid: first row contains a sequence of same color (ensemble) across some columns, then black (.) rest of row? In examples, first row has a block of same color (G or B) then dots. The rest rows are all dots. Output: we need to produce a pattern of that color arranged in a "pyramid" of phrase lengths across multiple rows (staves). Ascending phrase lengths from 1 up to ensemble count, then descending back to 1. Place a single rest between consecutive phrases. Flow across staves of same width as ensemble row. Let's analyze Example 1. Input: first row: G G G G G G . . . . . (6 G's then 5 dots). So ensemble count = 6? The width of ensemble row = total columns? Input grid width appears 11 columns. The ensemble row has 6 G's then 5 dots. So ensemble count = number of G's = 6. Output grid (given) appears 5 rows? Let's count rows: Provided output lines: 1: G . G G . G G G . G G 2: G G . G G G G G . G G 3: G G G G . G G G G G . 4: G G G G . G G G . G G 5: . G . . . . . . . . . That's 5 rows, each 11 columns. We need to see pattern. Let's map positions (col 1-11). Represent G as 1, . as 0. Row1: 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 Row2: 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Row3: 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Row4: 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 Row5: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interesting. The pattern seems like moving a sliding window of length varying? Let's think of phrase lengths: ascending from 1 to 6 then descending back to 1. Place a single rest between consecutive phrases. So we need to write sequences of G's of length 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1? That's total 11 phrases? Actually ascending 1..6 then descending 5..1 gives 11 phrases. Between each phrase a rest (single dot). So total length = sum of phrase lengths + number of rests between them (which is number of phrases -1). Let's compute: sum lengths = 1+2+3+4+5+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 36. Number of rests = 10. Total cells = 46. But width is 11, not 46. So they are arranged across multiple rows (staves) of same width as ensemble row (11). So we fill row by row left to right, moving to next row when exceed width? "Flow the music across staves of the same width as the ensemble row." So we treat the sequence of notes and rests as a linear sequence, and we wrap to next row after reaching width. Thus we need to generate the linear sequence of colors (G) and rests (.) according to phrase lengths pattern, then fill rows of width equal to input width (11) top to bottom. Let's test this hypothesis with Example1. Generate sequence: phrase lengths ascending then descending, with single rest between p ... [8866 chars truncated]
"A relay team builds momentum — the first runner takes one stride, the next takes two, building until the whole squad has run, then the cool-down lap mirrors the build-up in reverse. A single cone marks each handoff zone, and the track wraps around a fixed-width oval."
120b: fail
See: Athletes line up across the starting blocks at the top of the track. The lanes ahead are empty.
Do: Run relay legs of increasing stride count up to the team size, then decreasing back down. Place one cone between each leg. Wrap the full route around an oval whose width matches the starting blocks.
Grid: Strides are the team color, cones are black. The oval determines the row width; the number of laps fills as needed.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. We have input grid with top row containing a run of same color (team color) across columns, rest rows empty (dots). Output shows pattern of that color and black dots (.) placed as cones between legs. The description: athletes line up across starting blocks at top of track. Lanes ahead empty. Run relay legs of increasing stride count up to team size, then decreasing back down. Place one cone between each leg. Wrap full route around an oval whose width matches the starting blocks. The oval determines row width; number of laps fills as needed. Interpretation: Starting row length = number of athletes (team size). We need to create a pattern that goes down rows forming a "snake" or "zigzag" path that expands then contracts? Let's examine Example1. Input: top row: G G G G G G (6 greens) then rest empty (10 columns?). Actually input grid 10 columns? Let's count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11? Wait there are spaces. Let's count: G G G G G G . . . . . => 11 columns. Output grid appears 5 rows? Let's count rows: output lines: 5 rows. Row1: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 columns. Row2: "G G . G G G G G . G G" 11. Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." 11. Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" 11. Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." 11. So pattern: Starting top row (row1) has 6 G's originally. Output row1 now has G's and dots interspersed. Row5 has a single G at column2? Actually ". G . . . . . . . . .". So the path seems to snake downwards and back up? Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 1-11. Input top row had G at cols1-6. Output row1: G at col1, dot at2, G at3, G at4, dot5, G6, G7, G8, dot9, G10, G11. So pattern: groups of G with single dot between groups? Not exactly. Row2: G at1,2, dot3, G4-8, dot9, G10,11. Row3: G1-4, dot5, G6-10, dot11. Row4: G1-4, dot5, G6-8, dot9, G10,11. Row5: dot1, G2, dot3-11. Seems like a diagonal line of dots moving rightwards each row? Let's see positions of dots that are not part of original? The "cones" are black (.) placed between each leg. So maybe we are drawing a path of length equal to number of athletes (team size) across rows, with each leg length increasing then decreasing. Team size = number of athletes = count of colored cells in top row = 6. So we need to create legs of stride counts: 1,2,3,4,5,6 then decreasing 5,4,3,2,1? Or up to team size then back down. Starting at top row, first leg maybe length 1 (just the first athlete?), then a cone (dot) then next leg length 2, etc. Let's attempt to simulate: Starting at column1 row1? The athletes line up across starting blocks at top of track. So they occupy contiguous cells at top row. The path will start at leftmost? The output shows G at col1 row1 (still). Then a dot at col2 row1 (cone). Then next leg of length 2? Row1 has G at col3-4 (two G). Then dot at col5. Then leg length 3? Row1 has G at col6-8 (three G). Then dot at col9. Then leg length 4? Row1 has G at col10-11 (only two G). Hmm not matching. But maybe the path ... [10843 chars truncated]
"A storm gathers — first a brief gust, then a longer squall, each wave of wind more sustained than the last until the tempest peaks, then it subsides symmetrically. Calm breaths separate each gale, and the weather chart scrolls across a fixed-width barograph drum."
120b: k=2
See: A pressure front is visible along the top edge of the barograph. Below it, the drum is calm and blank.
Do: Plot wind bursts of lengths 1, 2, 3... up to the front's width, then back down. A single calm cell separates each burst. Wrap the trace onto the drum at the chart's width.
Grid: Storm cells are the front's color; calm is black. The drum width matches the chart. Rows extend as needed.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid has top row with colored cells (front) and rest black. Output shows pattern of bursts of increasing length then decreasing, separated by single black cells, wrapped onto drum width (same as chart width). Essentially we need to generate a pattern across rows (vertical) maybe like a diagonal? Let's examine Example1. Input: width? Let's count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns. Top row has 6 G then 5 . (black). Rest rows all black. Output grid appears to have 5 rows (maybe same as number of rows needed for pattern). Output rows: Row1: "G . G G . G G G . G G" Row2: "G G . G G G G G . G G" Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." Let's count columns each row: Row1 has 11 entries? Let's count: G(1) .2 G3 G4 .5 G6 G7 G8 .9 G10 G11 => 11 columns matches width. Rows count 5. Input had many rows (9). Output uses 5 rows (maybe front width = 6? Actually front width is number of colored cells in top row: 6 G. The pattern: bursts lengths 1,2,3,... up to front width (6) then back down? But we see bursts lengths maybe 1,2,3,4,5,6 then 5,4,3,2,1? However output rows only 5 rows, not 11. Let's analyze pattern. Interpretation: We have a "drum" (vertical) where we wrap trace onto width. The bursts are sequences of front color (G) of length L placed horizontally? Actually output rows show G's in various positions, with black separating bursts. Let's examine row1: pattern of G's: positions: 1,3,4,6,7,8,10,11. That's groups: single G at col1, then group of two G at col3-4, then group of three G at col6-8, then group of two G at col10-11? Wait that's length 2 not 4. Actually after group of three, there is a black at col9, then two G at 10-11 (length2). Not matching increasing then decreasing. Row2: G at 1-2, then black at3, then group of 5? Let's list: cols1 G,2 G,3 .,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 .,10 G,11 G. So groups: length2, length5, length2. Row3: G at 1-4, then .5, then G6-10 (5), then .11. groups: length4, length5. Row4: G1-4, .5, G6-8 (3), .9, G10-11 (2). groups: 4,3,2. Row5: .1, G2, .3-11 all .? Actually row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." So only a single G at col2. Hmm. Maybe the pattern is a diagonal trace that moves right each row, wrapping around width, and bursts lengths correspond to distance from front? Let's think of "wind bursts of lengths 1,2,3... up to the front's width, then back down. A single calm cell separates each burst. Wrap the trace onto the drum at the chart's width." Interpretation: Starting at leftmost column? The "front" is top row colored cells (G). The "burst" is a run of front color placed on drum rows, with a black cell separating bursts. The lengths increase then decrease. Essentially we need to produce a sequence of runs of G of lengths 1,2,3,...,frontWidth, frontWidth-1,...,1, each separated by a single black cell, placed sequentially across rows, wrapping to next row when exceed width? But output shows rows with multiple runs p ... [7877 chars truncated]
"A mason lays courses of brick — a single brick, then a pair, then a triple — each course wider than the last until the foundation's full span is reached, then the arch narrows back symmetrically. A mortar joint separates each course, and the wall wraps across a façade of fixed width."
120b: k=1
See: Building materials are stacked across the top of the blueprint. The construction site below is bare ground.
Do: Lay brick courses ascending from 1 to the material count, then descending back to 1, with a single mortar gap between courses. Wrap the brickwork across the façade width.
Grid: Bricks match the material color; mortar and ground are black. The façade width equals the blueprint's. Rows stack as needed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input: top row has G repeated 6 then . . . . . (10 columns?). Actually input grid size? Let's count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns. Then many rows of all . (black). Output grid also 5 rows? Let's count output rows: they show 5 rows. Output first row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 columns. Second row: "G G . G G G G G . G G" 11. Third: "G G G G . G G G G G ." 11. Fourth: "G G G G . G G G . G G" 11. Fifth: ". G . . . . . . . . ." 11. So transformation builds a "brick pattern" using the material color (G) from top row of input (the "materials stacked across the top of the blueprint"). The rest are black (ground). Output shows bricks arranged in ascending then descending counts with a mortar gap (single black column) between courses, wrapping across width. Interpretation: We have a sequence of bricks (colored cells) equal to count of material cells in top row? Input top row has 6 G's then 5 . (black). So material count = 6. Need to lay brick courses ascending from 1 to material count then descending back to 1, with a single mortar gap between courses. Wrap across width. So we need to produce rows (courses) where each row contains a contiguous block of G bricks of length equal to the course number? But also there is a mortar gap (single black column) between courses (i.e., between rows?). Actually "single mortar gap between courses" likely means a column of black separating each brick block horizontally? Let's examine output. Let's map rows: Row1: G . G G . G G G . G G Interpret as pattern of bricks of sizes? Let's identify groups of G separated by single . (black). Row1 groups: "G" (size1), then "G G" (size2), then "G G G" (size3), then "G G" (size2), then "G G"? Wait after last . there is "G G". Actually row1: positions: 1 G,2 .,3 G,4 G,5 .,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 .,10 G,11 G. So groups: size1 at col1, size2 at cols3-4, size3 at cols6-8, size2 at cols10-11. That's ascending 1,2,3 then descending 2? Not full descending to 1 because width limited? Material count is 6, but we see max size 3. Hmm maybe each row corresponds to a "course" and we wrap across width, meaning we place bricks sequentially across rows, moving left to right, top to bottom, with a mortar column between bricks. The bricks sizes follow pattern 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1 (ascending then descending). Each brick is a block of G of that length, separated by a single . column. We fill the grid row by row, wrapping to next row when exceed width. Let's test: material count =6, so sequence of brick lengths: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1 (total bricks = 11). Each brick placed with a mortar column after it except maybe last? In output, we see bricks of lengths: 1,2,3,2,2? Not matching. Let's simulate filling across rows of width 11. Starting at row1 col1: place brick length1 (G). Then mortar column (.) at col2. Next brick length2 occupies col3-4 (GG). Mortar at col5 (.). Next brick length3 occupies col6-8 (GGG). Mortar at col9 (.). Next brick length4 would ... [9134 chars truncated]
"A general deploys troops in escalating waves — a single scout, then a pair, then a squad — each sortie larger until the full regiment is committed, then a symmetric withdrawal. A no-man's-land gap separates each wave, and the battle report is transcribed across dispatch pages of fixed width."
120b: k=1
See: A regiment is mustered along the northern edge of the battlefield. The terrain below is empty.
Do: Deploy waves of troops sized 1 through the regiment count, then shrink back to 1. Leave a single empty cell between waves. Transcribe the deployment onto pages matching the battlefield width.
Grid: Soldiers are the regiment's color; empty ground is black. Page width equals the battlefield. Pages stack as needed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input: first row has G repeated 6 then . . . . . (10 columns?). Actually input grid: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns? Count: G G G G G G =6, then . . . . . =5 total 11. Then 8 more rows of all . (10 rows?). Output grid appears 5 rows? Let's count output rows: given 5 rows. Output first row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 columns. So output height is 5 rows (same as number of G in first row? Input had 6 Gs). Let's analyze pattern. Interpretation: regiment along northern edge (top row) of color G. Deploy waves of troops sized 1 through regiment count then shrink back to 1, leaving a single empty cell between waves. Transcribe onto pages matching battlefield width. Pages stack as needed. Seems we take the top row of colored cells (regiment) length N (here 6). We need to create a pattern of that color placed in successive rows (pages) forming a triangle wave: first wave size 1, then 2, up to N, then N-1 down to 1? But also leave a single empty cell between waves horizontally? Let's examine output. We have 5 rows output. N=6. But rows =? maybe N-1? Let's list rows with positions of G. Row1: G . G G . G G G . G G Indices 0-10. Let's mark G positions: 0,2,3,5,6,7,9,10. That's groups: single G at col0, then two G at 2-3, then three G at5-7, then two G at9-10? Actually that's 2 not 4. Wait pattern maybe wave sizes 1,2,3,2,1? That would be 5 rows. Yes N=3? But we have 6 G in top row. Hmm. Let's compute wave sizes: Row1 has groups of G separated by single . . pattern: . between groups. Row1 groups sizes: 1,2,3,2,2? Not symmetrical. Let's view each row as a "page" of width equal to battlefield width (11). The regiment count maybe number of columns with G in top row =6. Deploy waves sized 1 through regiment count then shrink back to 1. So we need to create rows where we place a contiguous block of G of size k, then a dot, then block size k+1, etc? Actually "Leave a single empty cell between waves." Means between each wave horizontally there is a dot column. So we need to place blocks of G of sizes 1,2,3,...,N, then N-1,...,1 across the row, separated by single . columns. That would produce a sequence of blocks across a single row. But output shows multiple rows, not a single row. However "Pages stack as needed" meaning if the sequence exceeds width, we wrap to next row (page). So we fill rows left to right with blocks separated by a dot, moving to next row when run out of columns. Thus we generate a linear sequence of blocks: sizes 1,2,...,N,N-1,...,1. Insert a dot between each block (single empty cell). Then fill into rows of width equal to input width (same as battlefield width). Starting at top-left of output grid (row0 col0). Fill sequentially; when reach end of row, continue on next row (new page). The output height is enough to contain all. Now test with N=6. Sequence of block sizes: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1 (total blocks = 11). Between each block a dot column (except maybe after last?). So total ce ... [8444 chars truncated]
"Actors enter from the wings in growing ensembles — a monologue, then a duet, then a trio — building to a full-cast number, then exiting in reverse. A beat of darkness falls between each scene, and the script wraps across pages as wide as the stage."
120b: k=1
See: The full cast is introduced along the top of the playbill. The stage below is dark and empty.
Do: Stage scenes with ascending then descending cast sizes from 1 to the troupe count and back. A single blackout separates scenes. Wrap the script onto pages matching the stage width.
Grid: Performers are the troupe color; blackouts are black. Page width matches the playbill. Pages fill as needed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid: first row has G repeated 6 then . . . . . (10 columns?). Actually input shows: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11 columns? Count: G G G G G G =6, then . . . . . =5 total 11. Then 8 more rows of all . (empty). Output grid is 5 rows? Let's count output rows: lines given 5 rows. Output rows have 11 columns each? Let's count first output row: "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11. Good. So output height reduced to 5 rows (maybe number of G's?). Interpretation: The metaphor: cast introduced along top of playbill (first row). Stage below dark empty. Need to stage scenes with ascending then descending cast sizes from 1 to troupe count and back. A single blackout separates scenes. Wrap script onto pages matching stage width. Pages fill as needed. So we have top row of colors (cast). Need to create pattern of scenes: sequences of that color of length increasing from 1 up to count of cast (maybe number of columns of that color?) then decreasing back to 1, separated by black cells (.) as blackout between scenes. Wrap onto rows (pages) of width equal to stage width (same as input width). Fill as needed. In example, top row has 6 G's then 5 blanks. So troupe count maybe 6 (number of G). Need to produce scenes of sizes 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1? That's 11 scenes. Each scene is a block of G's of that length placed consecutively horizontally? But output rows show pattern across rows. Let's try to reconstruct: Output first row: G . G G . G G G . G G Interpret as scenes placed left to right with black between. Scenes sizes: 1 G, then blackout ., then 2 G G, then blackout ., then 3 G G G, then blackout ., then 4? Actually after third scene we have . G G G . G G? Wait we have: positions: 1 G,2 .,3 G,4 G,5 .,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 .,10 G,11 G. That's scenes of sizes: 1,2,3,2? Not matching. Maybe the pattern is vertical stacking: each row corresponds to a "page". Scenes are placed vertically (downwards) with each scene being a column of G's of certain height? Let's view output as 5 rows. Let's write columns: col1: rows: G,G,G,G,. => 4 G then . (so column of G's length 4) col2: . G G G G => 4 G after first .? Actually rows: row1 '.' row2 G row3 G row4 G row5 G => 4 G bottom. col3: G . G G . => pattern. Hard. Maybe rule: take the top row colors, then create a diagonal pattern like a pyramid? Ascending then descending cast sizes maybe refer to number of consecutive same color cells per row, forming a triangle. Let's attempt to generate pattern: For n=6, we need rows representing sizes from 1 to 6 then back to 1, each row having that many G's contiguous, centered? But output rows are 5 rows not 11. Maybe they wrap onto pages of width equal to stage width (input width). So we write the sequence of scenes (blocks) linearly, and fill rows left to right, wrapping when exceed width. Scenes are blocks of G of length k, separated by a single black cell. So we have sequence of lengths: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1. Insert a black betwe ... [8041 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants beds of flowers in increasing lengths along a serpentine path — one bulb, then two, then three — peaking at full bloom, then pruning back symmetrically. A stepping stone separates each bed, and the path winds back and forth across a plot of fixed width."
120b: k=2
See: Seeds are laid out across the top edge of the garden plot. The soil below is bare.
Do: Plant flower beds of lengths 1 up to the seed count, then back down to 1. Place a single stepping stone between each bed. Wind the path across the plot's width.
Grid: Flowers are the seed color; stones and bare soil are black. Plot width stays the same. Rows grow as the path winds.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 input: first row has G G G G G G then rest rows empty (black). So seed count = 6? Actually there are 6 G in top row, then 5 columns of '.'? Input width appears 10 columns? Let's count: "G G G G G G . . . . ." that's 11? Wait spaces separate. Let's count: G(1) G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 .7 .8 .9 .10 .11 => width 11. Height 9 rows (including top). Output grid appears 5 rows? Actually output lines: first line "G . G G . G G G . G G" that's 11 columns. second line "G G . G G G G G . G G" 11. third "G G G G . G G G G G ." 11. fourth "G G G G . G G G . G G" 11. fifth ". G . . . . . . . . ." 11. So output height 5 rows. So transformation creates a "winding path" of the seed color across rows, with stepping stones (black) between beds. The description: Plant flower beds of lengths 1 up to seed count, then back down to 1. Place a single stepping stone between each bed. Wind the path across the plot's width. So we need to generate a pattern of the seed color (G) forming segments of increasing length from 1 to N (seed count) then decreasing back to 1, with a single black cell between each segment. The path winds across rows (like snake). The width stays same (same number columns). Rows increase as needed. Let's test with example1: seed count = 6 (since 6 G in top row). So lengths: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1? Actually up to seed count then back down to 1. That would be 1..6..1 total 11 segments. Between each segment a black cell (single). So total cells per row? The path winds across rows, meaning we fill cells sequentially left-to-right then next row right-to-left etc? Let's simulate. We have width 11. Starting at top-left? The top row of input had seeds across first 6 columns. That maybe indicates starting point? The output first row: G . G G . G G G . G G. Let's map segments: length1: G at col1. Then black at col2. length2: G G at col3-4. black at col5. length3: G G G at col6-8. black at col9. length4: G G at col10-11? Wait length4 should be 4 cells but only 2 left. Actually output row1 has G at col10 and col11 (two). So maybe the path continues to next row. Let's list output rows with coordinates. Row1: col1 G, col2 ., col3 G, col4 G, col5 ., col6 G, col7 G, col8 G, col9 ., col10 G, col11 G. Row2: "G G . G G G G G . G G" col1 G,2 G,3 .,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 .,10 G,11 G Row3: "G G G G . G G G G G ." col1 G,2 G,3 G,4 G,5 .,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 . Row4: "G G G G . G G G . G G" col1 G,2 G,3 G,4 G,5 .,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 .,10 G,11 G Row5: ". G . . . . . . . . ." col1 .,2 G,3 ., rest . Observations: The pattern seems like a diagonal snake? Let's think of path that goes right across row1, then down to row2, then left across row2? But row2 has G at col1-2 then black at col3 then many G etc. Not simple snake. Maybe the rule: Starting from top-left, we place segments of increasing length horizontally, but when hitting edge, we wrap to next row and continue direction opposite? Like a "boustrophedon" fill. Let's sim ... [8116 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a rectangular pattern of colored cells on the left side, followed by a region of black (.) cells extending to the right. The pattern has a key property: in each row, the first and last cells of the pattern share the same color, forming a 'border' color for that row. The interior cells between these matching border cells may be different colors.
Do: 1. Identify the pattern block on the left side of the grid (all columns before the black/dot region). Note its width W and the total grid width T. 2. For each row, identify the border color, which is the color of the first (and last) cell of the pattern block. 3. Construct the output row as follows: place the original pattern block at the left edge, place a mirrored copy of the pattern block at the right edge (so columns T-W through T-1 are the same as columns 0 through W-1), and fill all cells in between with that row's border color. 4. Repeat for every row.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid (same number of rows and columns). The height equals the height of the input pattern. The width equals the full grid width including the dot region. No black cells remain in the output; they are all replaced by either the repeated border color or the mirrored pattern.
"A herald's banner unfurls across a great hall, its emblem reflected in the mirror at the far wall."
120b: k=1
See: On the left edge of the hall hangs a narrow heraldic banner — each horizontal stripe bears a distinct coat of arms, framed on both sides by that stripe's own house color. The rest of the hall stretches away into darkness, an empty corridor of black stone.
Do: The banner is carried in procession across the hall. As it moves, each stripe leaves a ribbon of its house color trailing behind it, like a carpet unrolling. When the procession reaches the far wall, a great mirror reflects the banner's image back — an identical copy appears flush against the opposite wall. Between the real banner and its reflection, the hall is flooded with each row's house color, as though the family's standard has claimed every stone in its path.
Grid: The hall is exactly as wide and tall as before — no stones are added or removed. The darkness is banished entirely; every black stone is now draped in color. The original banner holds its place at the left wall, its twin gazes back from the right, and between them stretches an unbroken field of each row's own heraldic hue.
We need to infer rule. From description: left edge banner: each horizontal stripe distinct coat of arms, framed on both sides by that stripe's own house color. Input shows leftmost columns have pattern: each row has some colors (non-black) at left side, rest black. In output, the banner is duplicated on right side, and between them fill with each row's house color (the stripe's own house color). Also each stripe leaves a ribbon of its house color trailing behind it as it moves across. Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's count columns: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows 4. Input rows: Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . So leftmost three columns have pattern: each row has three colored cells (non-black). The rest are black '.'. Output rows (same size 12): Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: The leftmost three columns unchanged? Let's compare row1: first three are G R G same as input. Row2: B R B same. Row3: G R G same. Row4: B G B same. So original banner stays at left. Rightmost three columns? Let's see row1 last three columns: positions 10,11,12? Actually output row1: columns: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So rightmost three are columns 10-12: G R G? Wait column 10 is G, 11 is R, 12 is G. That's same as leftmost three. So mirror copy appears at right side, but maybe reversed? Not reversed; it's same orientation. Between left and right, there is a field of each row's house color. What is house color? For each row, maybe the color that frames the stripe? In description: each stripe framed on both sides by that stripe's own house color. In input, each row's stripe maybe has a central color? Let's examine row1: pattern G R G. The outer colors are G, middle is R. So house color maybe G? Because outer frames are G. Row2: B R B -> house color B. Row3 same as row1. Row4: B G B -> house color B (outer B). So between left and right, we see many G's for rows 1 and 3, many B's for rows 2 and 4. Indeed output row1 columns 4-9 are G (six G's). Row2 columns 4-9 are B (six B's). Row3 same as row1. Row4 same as row2. Thus rule: For each row, take the leftmost non-black segment (the "banner stripe") which consists of some pattern where the first and last cells are same color (house color) and there may be other colors inside. Keep that unchanged at left. Then replicate the same segment at rightmost side (same orientation). Fill all cells between left segment and right segment with the house color (the outer color of the segment). The width of fill is such that total width unchanged. Thus algorithm: Determine width of left segment (call w). Determine total columns C. For each row, copy left segment to columns C-w+1 .. C (rightmost). Fill columns w+1 .. C-w with house color (the first cell of left segment). That's it. Now ... [2395 chars truncated]
"A cell's membrane encloses its cytoplasm: the organelles cluster at both ends while the interior fills with the cell's own signature protein."
120b: k=1
See: A living cell with complex structures pressed against its walls and a hollow interior waiting to be filled with cellular fluid.
Do: The organelles at one wall replicate at the opposite wall, and the space between floods with the membrane's own essence — the color that defines each layer's boundary.
Grid: Output matches input dimensions. The pattern block appears at both left and right edges as mirror copies, with all interior cells filled by each row's outermost color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 4 rows? Example1 input shows 4 rows, each with 12 columns? Actually first row: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 entries. Similarly others. Output also 4 rows, 12 columns. Pattern: left side three columns have original pattern? Let's examine. Input row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G So output first three columns same as input (G R G). Then columns 4-10? Actually output columns 4-10 are G repeated? Let's list indices 1-12. Input row1: [1]G [2]R [3]G [4]. [5]. [6]. [7]. [8]. [9]. [10]. [11]. [12]. Output row1: [1]G [2]R [3]G [4]G [5]G [6]G [7]G [8]G [9]G [10]G [11]R [12]G Interesting: columns 4-10 filled with G (the outermost color? leftmost? Actually outermost color of row is G at column1 and column3 also G. The outermost color maybe the color at leftmost non-blank? That's G. Rightmost non-blank in input row is column3 also G. So fill interior with that color? But column11 is R, column12 is G. Wait column11 becomes R, column12 G. In input column11 was . column12 . . So why column11 becomes R? Maybe they mirror the pattern from left edge to right edge: pattern block appears at both left and right edges as mirror copies. So left block (first three columns) is G R G. Right block (last three columns) should be mirror copy? Mirror of left? Mirror of G R G is G R G (same). But output rightmost three columns are columns10-12? Actually output columns10-12 are G R G? Let's see: column10 G, column11 R, column12 G. Yes that matches mirror (same). So they placed left block at right edge as well. The interior columns (4-9) filled with each row's outermost color? Outer color maybe the color that defines each layer's boundary: "the color that defines each layer's boundary" maybe the color at the edge of the block (the outermost of the block) which is G? So interior filled with G. Now check row2: Input: B R B . . . . . . . . . Output: B R B B B B B B B B R B Left block B R B same. Right block B R B? Output last three columns: column10 B, column11 R, column12 B. Yes matches. Interior columns 4-9 filled with B (outermost color B). Good. Row3: Input G R G . . . . . . . . . Output G R G G G G G G G G R G same as row1. Row4: Input B G B . . . . . . . . . Output B G B B B B B B B B G B. Right block B G B? Output last three columns: column10 B, column11 G, column12 B. Yes. Thus rule: For each row, there is a pattern block of some width (maybe 3 columns) at left side (non-blank). The same block is copied to right side (mirrored horizontally) at the far right, preserving order (not reversed). The interior columns between left block and right block are filled with the outermost color of the row's block (the color at the leftmost column of the block? Or maybe the color that appears at both ends of block? In examples, block is symmetric: first and third same, outermost color same as those. So fill with that color. Now test input: Provided: Test Input: G A A G . . . . . . . . . . R B B ... [2485 chars truncated]
"Twin nebulae drift at the edges of a dark expanse, mirror images of each other, and the void between glows faintly with the spectral signature of each layer's dominant element."
120b: k=3
See: A colorful nebula occupies the left region of the star chart, each band framed by matching emission lines, with dark space extending rightward.
Do: A reflected nebula materializes at the right edge, and the dark space between fills with each band's framing emission color.
Grid: Same grid size. Pattern at left and right; interior cells become each row's border color.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1 input: 4 rows, 12 columns? Actually given as rows with spaces? Input rows: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Left region (first 3 columns) have pattern: columns 0-2 have colors, then rest are '.' (black). Output: same size 4x12. Output shows left region unchanged? Let's compare row1 input: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G. So left three cells same G R G. Right side (columns 3-11) now filled with colors: seems pattern: border color? The description: "each band's framing emission color". In input left region has bands? Let's examine rows: Row1: G R G (maybe pattern G R G). Row2: B R B. Row3: G R G. Row4: B G B. So each row has a "border color"? Possibly the outermost colors of the left pattern? For row1, leftmost and rightmost of the three are G, middle R. Border color maybe G? Row2 border colors B (both sides) and middle R. Row3 border G. Row4 border B? Actually row4 pattern B G B, border B. Output row1 after column3 onward: G G G G G G G G R G? Wait output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G. Let's list columns 0-11: 0 G,1 R,2 G,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 R,11 G. So after the left three, columns 3-9 are all G (the border color). Column10 is R (the middle color?), column11 is G (border again). So pattern: fill interior with border color, but keep the middle color at the far right? Actually column10 corresponds to second last column? In output, the rightmost column (11) is G (border). The column before that (10) is R (the middle color from left pattern). So they placed the middle color at the second-to-last column, and border color at the last column? Wait row2 output: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So columns 0 B,1 R,2 B, then columns3-9 B (border), column10 R, column11 B. Same pattern. Thus rule: For each row, take the leftmost three cells (pattern). The leftmost and rightmost of those three are the "border color". The middle is "center color". In output, keep the first three cells unchanged. Then fill the interior (columns after the first three up to second-to-last column) with border color. Then set the second-to-last column to center color, and last column to border color. But note number of columns: Input had 12 columns, with 9 '.' after first three. Output has 12 columns, with 9 filled: 6 border, then center, then border? Actually after first three, there are 9 columns left. In output, columns 3-9 (7 columns) are border, column10 center, column11 border. That's 7+1+1=9. So border fills all but last two columns? Wait 7 border cells, then center, then border. So border occupies all interior except the last two columns where center and border placed. Thus rule: replicate left pattern to right edge: the border color repeats across interior, and the center color appears just before the rightmost column, which is border color. Check Example2: Input rows length? Row1: "A R A . . . . . . ." that's 10 columns. Left three: A R A. Border A, center R. Output row1: " ... [8704 chars truncated]
"Identical lighthouses mark both ends of a channel, and the water between each pair of signal lamps shimmers with the color of the beacons that frame it."
120b: k=1
See: A column of signal lamps stands at the port side, each row's top and bottom lamps matching in color, with open water stretching to starboard.
Do: Erect a mirror lighthouse at starboard. The channel water in each row takes the color of that row's matching beacon lamps.
Grid: Output same dimensions. Pattern at both edges, gap cells adopt row's edge color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "column of signal lamps stands at the port side, each row's top and bottom lamps matching in color, with open water stretching to starboard. What to do: Erect a mirror lighthouse at starboard. The channel water in each row takes the color of that row's matching beacon lamps. Grid details: Output same dimensions. Pattern at both edges, gap cells adopt row's edge color." Interpretation: Input grid has left side column(s) with pattern? In example 1 input: 4 rows, 12 columns. First three columns have pattern: columns 0,1,2 have colors, rest are '.' (black). Output: left side same, right side (columns after?) become filled with colors: seems they fill the row with the color of the matching top and bottom lamps? Let's examine. Input row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row1 left three: G R G same. Right side columns 3-10 become G, column 11 becomes R, column12? Wait there are 12 columns total (0-11). Output row1: positions: 0 G 1 R 2 G 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 G 10 G? Actually they show "G R G G G G G G G G R G" that's 12 entries: indices 0-11. Let's list: 0 G,1 R,2 G,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 R,11 G. So after column2, they filled columns3-9 with G (the leftmost color? maybe the leftmost lamp color? Row's top and bottom lamps matching in color: top and bottom of column? Actually "each row's top and bottom lamps matching in color". In input, column0 and column2 maybe are top and bottom? Row's top and bottom lamps? Not sure. Row1 has leftmost three: G R G. The first and third are same (G). So top and bottom lamps matching (G). The middle is R maybe the "channel"? The output fills the interior (gap) with the matching edge color G, but also at far right column they put R then G? Wait column10 is R, column11 is G. Why R appears near right edge? Possibly they mirror the left pattern to the right side: the left side pattern (G R G) is mirrored to the right side: after the gap, we see G R G reversed? Let's see: Rightmost three columns (9,10,11) are G R G? Actually we have columns9 G,10 R,11 G. That's G R G, which matches left pattern. So they placed the left pattern at both edges, with the interior filled with the edge color (matching top/bottom). So pattern: leftmost three columns are pattern; rightmost three columns become mirror of that pattern (maybe reversed order?). In output row1, rightmost three are G R G which is same order as leftmost three, not reversed. So they just copy the leftmost three to the rightmost three. The interior columns (3-8) are filled with the edge color (the matching color G). So rule: Identify the leftmost non-'.' segment (continuous) that forms a pattern where first and last colors are same (matching top/bottom). Then fill the interior (the '.' region) with that matching color, and copy the left pattern to the right edge. Check row2: Input: B R B . . . . . . . . . Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Left pattern B R B (first and last B). Rightmos ... [3293 chars truncated]
"A circuit board has identical connector pins at both ends of each trace, and the copper fill between runs at the voltage level set by each row's termination resistor."
120b: k=1
See: A pin header sits at the left edge of the PCB, each row's first and last pins carrying the same signal color, with bare substrate extending right.
Do: Solder a matching pin header at the right edge and flood-fill each trace row with the signal color of its terminating pins.
Grid: Same dimensions. Pattern mirrored at right edge; interior cells filled with each row's border color.
We need to infer rule. From description: left edge has first and last pins same signal color per row. Input shows leftmost column and maybe some other column? Let's examine Example1. Input grid (looks 4 rows, 12 columns). Let's write rows: Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . So leftmost three columns have pattern: first column G,B,G,B; second column R,R,R,G; third column G,B,G,B. Actually row4 second column is G not R. So "first and last pins carrying same signal color" maybe means first and third columns are same per row? Row1 col1 G, col3 G same. Row2 col1 B, col3 B same. Row3 G,G. Row4 B,B. Yes first and last of the three are same. So each row has a "border color" which is the color of those edge pins (col1 and col3). The middle column maybe something else (signal? maybe different). In row1 middle is R, row2 middle R, row3 middle R, row4 middle G. So middle may be something else. Output grid: same dimensions 4x12. Output rows: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: The leftmost three columns unchanged? Let's compare row1 first three: G R G same as input. Row2 first three: B R B same. Row3 same. Row4 same. So border columns unchanged. The rest columns (positions 4-11?) are filled with something: For row1, columns 4-10 are G (the border color). Column 11 is R (the middle original? Actually original column 2 is R). Column12 is G (border). Wait output row1 length 12: indices 1-12. Let's list: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So after the three original columns, they filled columns 4-10 with border color G. Column 11 is the original middle column? Actually original column 2 is R, but column 11 is R. So they moved the middle column to near right edge? Let's see pattern: The rightmost column (col12) is border color G (same as leftmost). So they mirrored border at right edge. Similarly row2: output: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So columns 4-10 are B (border). Column11 is R (original middle). Column12 is B (border). Row3 same as row1. Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B. Here border is B, middle original is G (col2). Output column11 is G, column12 is B. Thus rule: Keep first three columns unchanged. Then fill columns 4 through (n-2) with the border color (color of column1). Then column (n-1) (second last) gets the original middle column (col2). Then last column gets border color again. Essentially we mirror the left edge pattern to right edge: the row's first and last pins (col1 and col3) same color; we extend that color across interior, but keep the middle column's color at the second-last position. But why column 11 (second-last) not column 4? Actually interior length = total columns - 4? Let's compute: total columns =12. We have left three columns fixed. Rightmost column is border. The second-last column is original middle column. The rest interior colu ... [6909 chars truncated]
"The gates of a divine realm bear twin guardian carvings — identical sentinels at each threshold — and the hall between is bathed in the aura of each row's guardian spirit."
120b: k=2
See: Guardian figures stand carved at the left gate, each tier's outermost figures sharing a divine color, with an empty hall stretching toward the far gate.
Do: Identical carvings appear at the far gate, and each tier's hall glows with the aura color of its guardian figures.
Grid: Dimensions unchanged. Pattern at both edges; gap filled per-row with the border color.
We need to infer rule. Look at example1. Input grid 4 rows, 12 columns? Actually given rows: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Similarly output also 12 columns. Pattern: left side has some pattern of colors in first 3 columns? Let's examine input example1 rows: Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . So left side 3 columns pattern: columns 1-3 have pattern. The rest columns 4-12 are all '.' (black). Output rows: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: The outermost figures (leftmost and rightmost?) "each tier's outermost figures sharing a divine color". The description: Guardian figures stand carved at the left gate, each tier's outermost figures sharing a divine color, with an empty hall stretching toward the far gate. Identical carvings appear at the far gate, and each tier's hall glows with the aura color of its guardian figures. So we replicate left pattern to right side, and fill interior with the color of the outermost figures (maybe the color at column1? Or maybe the color at column2? Let's see. Row1 input leftmost three: G R G. Outer figures maybe leftmost and rightmost of that pattern? The pattern is symmetric? Actually leftmost three: G (col1), R (col2), G (col3). Outer figures are col1 and col3 both G (same). So outermost color = G. In output row1, columns 1-3 remain same? Output row1 col1-3: G R G (same). Rightmost three columns (col10-12?) Let's see output row1: "G R G G G G G G G G R G". That's 12 columns. Let's index: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So rightmost three columns are columns 10-12: G R G which matches left pattern. So they duplicated pattern at far right. The interior columns (4-9) are filled with G (the outermost color). Indeed they are all G. So rule: replicate leftmost pattern (first N columns) to rightmost N columns, where N = width of pattern (maybe number of non-'.' columns in input). Fill the middle columns with the outermost color (the color that appears at both ends of the pattern). If outermost colors differ? In example2. Example2 input rows (3 rows, 10 columns). Input: Row1: A R A . . . . . . . Row2: B A B . . . . . . . Row3: B A B . . . . . . . Pattern width = 3 columns. Row1 outermost colors: A and A (same). Row2 outermost: B and B (same). Row3 same. Output rows: Row1: A R A A A A A A R A Row2: B A B B B B B B A B Row3: B A B B B B B B A B Check: Rightmost three columns (col8-10?) Let's index 10 columns: output row1: A R A A A A A A R A. So columns 1-3: A R A. columns 8-10: R A? Wait need to map. Let's list indices: 1 A,2 R,3 A,4 A,5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 R,10 A. Rightmost three columns are 8-10: A R A which matches left pattern. Good. Interior columns 4-7 are filled with outermost color A (since outermost = A). Indeed they are A. Row2 output: B A B B B B B B A B. Indices: 1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 B, ... [2878 chars truncated]
"Dancers in formation begin and end their routine in the same pose at opposite ends of the stage; between movements, each row holds a tableau in the color of the dancers' starting position."
120b: k=3
See: A formation of dancers poses at stage left, each row's lead and anchor wearing matching costumes, with empty stage stretching to the right.
Do: The formation reappears at stage right in mirror. Each row's empty stage between fills with the sustained color of that row's lead dancer.
Grid: Same grid dimensions. Pattern at left and right; interior cells take each row's first color.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has left pattern of some columns, then empty '.' cells to the right. Output: same dimensions, but pattern appears mirrored on right side? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's count columns: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows 4. Input row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: The left three columns (positions 1-3) remain same. Right side (positions 4-12) are filled with something. It seems they fill with the row's first color? Actually row1 first color G. But output positions 4-10 are G, position 11 is R, position12 is G. Wait pattern: G R G at left, then many G, then R, then G. So seems they mirror the left pattern to right side: left pattern G R G, rightmost pattern maybe G R G reversed? Let's see: left pattern = [G,R,G]. Mirror would be [G,R,G] reversed = [G,R,G] same because palindrome. But output right side: after many G's, we see R then G at end. Actually output row1: columns:1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So after column3, columns4-10 are G (the first color). Column11 is R (second color), column12 is G (third color). So they fill interior with first color, and then at far right they place the second and third colors? Let's check row2: left pattern B R B. Output: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So columns4-10 are B (first color), column11 R (second), column12 B (third). Row4 left pattern B G B. Output: B G B B B B B B B B G B. So interior B, then G, then B. Thus rule: For each row, keep left pattern unchanged. Then fill all interior cells (i.e., columns after the pattern up to before the last two columns?) with the first color of that row. Then the last two columns are the second and third colors of the original left pattern, respectively. Essentially the right side replicates the left pattern but shifted to the far right, with the interior filled with first color. Check Example2: Input rows length? "A R A . . . . . . ." that's 10 columns. Left pattern length 3. Output row1: A R A A A A A A R A. That's columns:1 A,2 R,3 A,4 A,5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 R,10 A. So interior columns 4-8 are first color A. Column9 is second color R, column10 third color A. Yes matches. Row2 input: B A B . . . . . . . Output: B A B B B B B B A B. So interior B, then A, then B. Row3 same as row2. Example3: Input rows length? "R G A R . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14 columns? Let's count: R G A R (4) then 10 dots =14. Left pattern length 4. Output row1: R G A R R R R R R R R G A R. That's 14 columns. So interior columns 5-11 are first color R. Column12 is second color G, column13 third color A, column14 fourth color R. So pattern: after left pattern, fill with first color for all but last (len(pattern)-1?) Actually we have pattern length =4. Output after left pattern: we ... [3201 chars truncated]
"A canyon reveals identical strata in its opposing cliff faces, and the sediment floor between them is composed of whatever mineral defines each stratum's outer rind."
120b: k=1
See: A cliff face on the left shows layered strata, each layer's top and bottom surfaces sharing a mineral color, with an eroded gap stretching to the right.
Do: An identical cliff face is exposed at the right edge. The canyon floor at each layer's depth fills with the mineral color of that stratum's outer rind.
Grid: Output same size. Pattern mirrored at right edge; gap cells filled per-row with border color.
We need to infer rule. From example 1: Input grid size? Let's count columns: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows 4. Output also 4 rows, 12 columns. Input shows left side pattern of three columns with colors, then a gap of 9 columns (dots). Output fills the gap with colors based on "border color" per row? Let's examine. Input row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G So leftmost three cells unchanged. Rightmost? The pattern seems to mirror left side? Let's see: left side pattern: G R G. Right side after fill: ... G G G G G G G G R G. The rightmost column (col12) is G, which matches leftmost? Actually leftmost col1 is G, col12 is G. Column2 is R, column11 is R. Column3 is G, column10 is G. So seems mirrored horizontally across center? Let's map: Input left pattern of width 3, maybe also right side pattern of same width appears at right edge? In output, we see pattern of width 3 at right edge: columns 10-12 are G R G? Wait output row1 columns 10-12: column10 = G? Let's list output row1: positions 1-12: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So rightmost three are G,R,G? Actually col10 G, col11 R, col12 G. That's G,R,G but order is G,R,G? Wait leftmost three are G,R,G. Rightmost three are G,R,G but shifted? leftmost: G,R,G. Rightmost: G,R,G (col10 G, col11 R, col12 G). So yes mirrored but same orientation (not reversed). So they just copy the leftmost pattern to the rightmost side. Now the middle columns (4-9) are filled with a single color per row: row1 they are G. Row2: Input row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So middle columns 4-9 are B. Row3: G R G -> middle filled G. Row4: B G B -> middle filled B? Output row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B. Yes middle filled B. Thus rule: For each row, identify the leftmost non-dot segment (maybe contiguous colored cells). Determine its outer "rind" colors? The description says each layer's top and bottom surfaces share a mineral color, with an eroded gap stretching to the right. The canyon floor at each layer's depth fills with the mineral color of that stratum's outer rind. So the "border color" is the color of the outermost cells of that segment? For row1, outer colors are G (both sides same). So fill with G. Row2 outer colors are B (both sides same). Row4 outer colors are B (both sides same). Row3 outer colors G. Thus fill middle gap with the color that appears on the outer edges of the left segment (maybe first and last cell of that segment). If they differ? Not in examples. Also copy the left segment to right edge (mirrored). The right edge width equals left segment width. Thus for test input: grid size? Let's count columns: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14 columns? Let's count: G(1) A2 A3 G4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14? Actually there are 14 columns. Rows 4. Left segment appears to be first 4 columns: G A A G (non-dots). Then gap of 10 columns. We need to copy this segment to right edge: last 4 co ... [1310 chars truncated]
"A sandwich is assembled: ornate garnishes bookend each layer, and the filling between is simply the bread that holds the row together."
120b: k=1
See: Ingredients are stacked on the left side of the cutting board, each row's first and last morsels matching in flavor, with an empty counter stretching to the right.
Do: Duplicate the garnish arrangement at the far end of the counter and spread each layer's binding ingredient — the flavor of its bookends — across the gap between.
Grid: Same dimensions as input. Pattern appears at left and right edges; all black cells become the border color of their row.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 4 rows, 12 columns? Actually example 1 input shows 4 rows, each with 12 entries: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." etc. Output also 4 rows, 12 columns. Let's examine. Input row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observation: Left side pattern (first three columns) same as input. Right side (last three columns?) In output, columns 10-12? Let's index columns 1-12. Input row1: col1 G,2 R,3 G,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 . Output row1: col1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So output replicates left pattern at right side? The rightmost three columns (10-12) become G R G (same as leftmost three). Indeed col10 G? Wait leftmost three are G,R,G. Output col10 G, col11 R, col12 G matches. Also columns 4-9 are filled with something: all G for row1, B for row2, G for row3, B for row4. That seems to be the "binding ingredient" i.e., the flavor of its bookends (first and last morsels matching). The first and last morsels matching in flavor: In input, first and last non-empty? Actually input only has left side non-empty; right side empty. The rule: duplicate the left pattern at far right (mirrored? same order). Then fill the gap between with the border color of that row (the color of the bookends). The bookends are first and last non-empty cells after duplication? The first and last morsels matching in flavor: leftmost and rightmost after duplication are same pattern, so the "binding ingredient" is the color of the border? In output, the filler color is the color of the border cells? For row1, border cells are G (leftmost) and G (rightmost) both G, filler is G. Row2 border cells are B and B, filler B. Row3 border G, filler G. Row4 border B, filler B. So filler is the color of the border cells (which are same). So rule: take leftmost contiguous non-blank segment (maybe up to first blank) as pattern. Mirror it to rightmost side of row (same length). Fill the interior (between left pattern and right pattern) with the border color (the color of the leftmost cell? Or maybe the color of the first cell of pattern). In example, leftmost cell colors are G,B,G,B respectively, which matches filler. Now test input: 4 rows, 14 columns? Provided: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14? Let's count: G(1) A2 A3 G4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14? Actually there are 14 columns. Row2: "R B B R . . . . . . . . . ." also 14. Row3: "B G G B . . . . . . . . . ." Row4: "R B B R . . . . . . . . . ." So left pattern length? The non-blank segment appears to be first 4 cells (since after that blanks). So pattern length =4. Need to duplicate this pattern at far right (last 4 columns). Then fill interior columns (5 to (total-4)) with filler color = border color (first cell? maybe leftmost cell). Let's verify wit ... [1015 chars truncated]
"An orchestra plays a motif, then a single instrument sustains a drone note until the motif returns in retrograde at the coda."
120b: k=1
See: A short melodic phrase sits at the opening of each staff line, followed by rests stretching to the final bar. Each phrase begins and ends on the same note.
Do: The opening phrase echoes at the close, and the silence between is filled by sustaining each line's tonic — the note that opens and closes the phrase.
Grid: Output has identical dimensions. The motif block is placed at both edges of each row; intervening cells take the row's first color.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: "short melodic phrase sits at the opening of each staff line, followed by rests stretching to the final bar. Each phrase begins and ends on the same note. What to do: The opening phrase echoes at the close, and the silence between is filled by sustaining each line's tonic — the note that opens and closes the phrase. Grid details: Output has identical dimensions. The motif block is placed at both edges of each row; intervening cells take the row's first color." Interpretation: For each row, there is a motif block at the start (some pattern) and at the end (mirrored?). The rest of the row (between) is filled with the row's first color (the tonic). The motif block is the same as the opening phrase (the first few cells) and also placed at the end (echo). So output: leftmost block same as input leftmost block (maybe up to first non-zero? Actually in examples, we need to examine. Example 1 Input (I'll rewrite as rows with spaces): Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . Output rows: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: Input first three cells are motif: pattern of three colors (e.g., G R G). Then rest are '.' (black). Output: first three cells unchanged. Then many cells (positions 4-10) are filled with the row's first color (the tonic). Row1 first color is G, so positions 4-10 become G. Then at position 11 (second to last?) they have R (the second color of motif?) Actually output row1: positions: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So the last three cells are R G? Wait motif length 3, but at end we have "R G"? Let's see: The motif at start is G R G. At end we have R G? Actually the last three cells are "R G"? Let's list: output row1 length 12. Indices 1-12. Indices: 1 G 2 R 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 G 10 G 11 R 12 G So the ending block is "R G"? That's only two cells. But maybe the motif is placed at both edges, overlapping? Let's think: The phrase begins and ends on same note. So motif maybe first and last note same (G). The phrase length maybe 3? Starting G R G (ends G). At the end of row, we need to echo the opening phrase: maybe we place the motif reversed? Or we place the motif but overlapping the last note with the row's last cell? Let's examine row2. Row2 input: B R B . . . . . . . . . Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Indices: 1 B 2 R 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 R 12 B Again, start motif B R B, then filler B's, then at positions 11-12 we have R B (two cells). So the ending block is "R B". That's the middle and last of motif? Actually motif is B R B. The ending block appears to be "R B". That's motif positions 2-3? Similarly row1 ending block "R G" corresponds to motif positions 2-3 (R G). So the ending block is motif without the first cell (the tonic). So we have start motif (f ... [4067 chars truncated]
"Two teams in matching jerseys stand at opposite ends of the field; the grass between is painted in each lane's team color for the home stretch."
120b: k=1
See: Players are lined up on the left sideline in formation, with an empty field stretching out to the right boundary.
Do: Mirror the formation at the far sideline, then paint each lane of the field with the color of the players who bookend it.
Grid: Same grid size. Pattern block at left and right edges; interior cells of each row filled with that row's border color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Players are lined up on the left sideline in formation, with an empty field stretching out to the right boundary. Mirror the formation at the far sideline, then paint each lane of the field with the color of the players who bookend it. Grid details: Same grid size. Pattern block at left and right edges; interior cells of each row filled with that row's border color." Interpretation: Input grid has left side pattern (some columns) and rest empty (dots). Output: replicate pattern on right side (mirror) and fill interior cells between left and right patterns with the border color of that row (maybe the color of the players who bookend it). In example 1: Input grid 4 rows, 12 columns? Let's examine. Input example 1 rows: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." "B R B . . . . . . . . ." "G R G . . . . . . . . ." "B G B . . . . . . . . ." So first three columns have pattern: row1 G R G, row2 B R B, row3 G R G, row4 B G B. Rest are dots. Output rows: "G R G G G G G G G G R G" "B R B B B B B B B B R B" "G R G G G G G G G G R G" "B G B B B B B B B B G B" Now output has same size (12 columns). Rightmost three columns appear to be mirror of leftmost three? Let's see row1 left pattern G R G, rightmost three columns are R G? Actually output row1: columns: 1 G,2 R,3 G, then columns 4-10 are G, column11 R, column12 G. So rightmost three columns are columns 10-12? Wait count: 12 columns. Let's index: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So rightmost three are columns 10-12: G R G? Actually column10 G, column11 R, column12 G => G R G which matches left pattern. So it's mirrored? Not reversed but same order? Mirror across vertical axis would reverse order: left pattern G R G would become G R G reversed is G R G (palindrome) same. For row2 left pattern B R B, rightmost three columns are B R B (col10 B, col11 R, col12 B). Row4 left pattern B G B, rightmost three columns B G B. So indeed right side replicates left pattern (maybe mirrored but same because symmetric). So rule: copy leftmost block to rightmost block. Now interior cells (columns between left block and right block) are filled with the border color of that row. Which border color? "color of the players who bookend it" meaning the leftmost and rightmost border colors? In row1 leftmost is G, rightmost is G (same). So interior filled with G. Indeed columns 4-9 are G. Row2 leftmost B, rightmost B, interior B. Row4 leftmost B, rightmost B, interior B. Row3 leftmost G, rightmost G, interior G. So interior filled with that border color (which is same as leftmost). If leftmost and rightmost differ, maybe they are same? In examples they are same because pattern symmetric. But description says "paint each lane of the field with the color of the players who bookend it." If left and right colors differ, maybe choose something else? Could be they are same always. Now test input: 4 rows, 13 columns? Let's count: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." That's 14? Let's count tok ... [1995 chars truncated]
"Storm fronts converge from both horizons — identical cloud formations approach from east and west, and the sky between takes on the hue of each layer's pressure band."
120b: k=3
See: A weather system sits at the western edge of the radar map, each altitude band framed by matching pressure colors, with clear sky extending eastward.
Do: The system reappears at the eastern edge, and the clear sky between saturates with each altitude band's framing pressure color.
Grid: Dimensions unchanged. Pattern mirrored at right edge; gap cells adopt each row's outermost color.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1 input: 4 rows, 12 columns? Actually given: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. The leftmost 3 columns have pattern: columns 0-2: G R G; row2: B R B; row3: G R G; row4: B G B. The rest columns 3-11 are '.' (black). Output: same dimensions 4x12. Output shows leftmost 3 columns unchanged? Let's see output row1: "G R G G G G G G G G R G". So columns 0-2 same as input? Input row1 col0 G matches output col0 G. col1 R matches. col2 G matches. Then columns 3-9 are G (the same as outermost leftmost? Actually outermost color of row? Row1 outermost leftmost color is G (col0). Rightmost? Input had '.' so outermost rightmost is '.'? But output column10 is R, column11 G. Wait output row1 col10 is R, col11 G. That seems like the pattern from left side mirrored to right side? Let's examine. Input row1: pattern G R G at cols0-2. Output row1: G R G (cols0-2) then many G's then at col10 R then col11 G. So the original pattern appears again at right edge, but reversed? Actually original pattern is G R G. At right edge we have ... R G (col10 R, col11 G). That's missing leading G? Let's see length: total 12 columns. If we place original pattern at rightmost positions aligning rightmost column with original rightmost? Original pattern width 3. Rightmost three columns of output are: col9 ?, col10 R, col11 G. Output row1 col9 is G (since many G's). So rightmost three are G R G? Wait col9 G, col10 R, col11 G => G R G matches original pattern. So pattern repeated at right edge exactly same orientation. So the pattern appears at both left and right edges, with the middle filled with the outermost color of the row (the leftmost color? maybe the "framing pressure color"). Specifically, row1 outermost color (leftmost) is G. The middle columns (from col3 to col8?) are filled with G. Indeed output row1 col3-8 are G. Row2: input leftmost pattern B R B. Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So leftmost three same, rightmost three B R B? Let's check: output row2 col9? col10 R, col11 B. Output row2 col9 B. So rightmost three B R B matches original. Middle columns filled with B (outermost leftmost color). Row3: input G R G. Output similar with middle G. Row4: input B G B. Output middle B? Wait outermost leftmost is B. Output row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B. Rightmost three B G B matches original. Middle columns B. Yes. Thus rule: For each row, take the leftmost contiguous non-'.' segment (maybe pattern) of length L (here 3). Replicate that segment at rightmost side of row (same orientation). Fill all cells between left segment and right segment (the gap) with the leftmost color (the first cell of the segment). The '.' cells become that color or the segment? In examples, '.' become filled accordingly. Now Example2: Input rows length? Row1: "A R A . . . . . . ." that's 10 columns. Left segment A R A (cols0-2). Output row1: "A R A A A A A A R A". Let's see: left segment unchanged. Rightmost three? Output last three columns ... [4202 chars truncated]
"Twin facades face each other across a courtyard, and each floor's corridor between them is tiled in the color of that story's cornerstone."
120b: k=1
See: A decorated facade stands at the left edge of the blueprint, each floor's first and last bricks sharing a color, with an empty lot stretching rightward.
Do: Erect a mirror-image facade at the right boundary and pave each floor's corridor with the cornerstone color that frames that level.
Grid: Same dimensions. Pattern at both edges; interior filled per-row with border color.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 4 rows? Let's view. Example1 Input (looks 4 rows, 12 columns): Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . Output: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: Input leftmost three columns have pattern: first and last bricks same color per row? Row1: G R G (first G last G). Row2: B R B. Row3: G R G. Row4: B G B (first B last B). Right side originally empty (dots). Output: The left pattern remains same, and also mirrored on right side? Let's see output row1: columns: G R G G G G G G G G R G. That's 12 columns. The left three are same as input. The rightmost three? At positions 10-12? Actually we need to see pattern: It seems they placed a mirror of the left three at rightmost three, but also filled interior with a "cornerstone color" that frames that level (the border color). The description: "pave each floor's corridor with the cornerstone color that frames that level." Means fill interior (between left and right facades) with the color that appears at the ends (first and last) of that row (which are same). For row1, border color is G. So interior columns (positions 4-9) become G. At rightmost three, they seem to be G R G? Wait row1 output ends with "R G". Actually output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G. Let's index: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So rightmost three are columns 10-12: G R G. That's mirror of left three? Left three: G R G. Yes same order. So they placed same three at rightmost three, not reversed. So it's a copy, not mirror horizontally. But description said mirror-image facade at right boundary. However they copy same orientation? Actually mirror would reverse order: G R G reversed is G R G (palindrome) same. For row2: left three B R B. Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B. Rightmost three columns 10-12: R B? Wait need check: row2 output: B R B B B B B B B B R B. That's 12 columns: 1 B,2 R,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B,11 R,12 B. Rightmost three: columns 10 B,11 R,12 B => B R B same as left three. So copy. Row4 left three B G B. Output row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B. Rightmost three columns 10 B,11 G,12 B => B G B same. Thus rule: For each row, take the first three cells (maybe first and last same color, middle maybe different). Keep them on left unchanged. Fill all interior cells (from column 4 to column (width-3)) with the border color (the color that appears at first and last positions, which are same). Then copy the first three cells to the rightmost three positions. Thus input width 12, interior width = 12-6 =6 columns (positions 4-9) filled with border color. Now test input: Provided: Test Input: G A A G . . . . . . . . . . R B B R . . . . . . . . . . B G G B . . . . . . . . . . R B B R . . . . . . . . . . Let's count columns. Row1: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." That's 14? Let's ... [2563 chars truncated]
"An army's vanguard and rearguard carry identical banners; between them, the marching column flies each regiment's flag color in an unbroken line."
120b: k=3
See: A formation of units is arrayed at the left flank, each row's leading and trailing soldiers bearing the same standard, with open ground ahead.
Do: Station an identical formation at the far flank, and fill the ground between with each regiment's standard color — an unbroken line of banners.
Grid: Output matches input size. Pattern duplicated at right; gap cells take each row's edge color.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has pattern on left side columns (maybe first 3 columns) with some colors, then empty '.' cells to the right. Output replicates pattern on right side as well, filling the middle with edge colors per row. Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions? Let's count columns: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows 4. Pattern: first three columns: G R G ; second row: B R B ; third: G R G ; fourth: B G B. So leftmost three columns have pattern where first and third columns are same (edge colors), middle column maybe different. The rest columns are '.'. Output: same size 12 columns. Output rows: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Observations: The leftmost three columns unchanged? Let's compare row1 input: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1 first three: G R G same. Row1 last three? Actually output row1 columns 4-10 are G repeated? Let's see: columns 4-10 (positions 4-10) are G G G G G G G? Actually output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G. That's 12 columns. So after first three, there are 7 columns of G? Let's index: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So pattern: left edge color G repeated across columns 4-10, then column 11 is the right edge color (same as column2? Actually column2 is R, column11 is R). Column12 is same as column1? Actually column12 is G (same as leftmost). So they placed a mirrored pattern? Let's think: The original leftmost three columns: left edge (col1) = G, middle (col2) = R, right edge (col3) = G (same as left). So edges are same color. The rule: replicate this three-column pattern at right side, but fill the middle columns with the edge color (the leftmost color) maybe? In output, columns 4-10 are G (edge color). Column11 is R (middle color). Column12 is G (edge). So they placed the pattern again at far right: columns 10-12? Actually far right three columns are columns 10-12? Let's see: columns 10-12 are G R G? No column10 is G, column11 R, column12 G => that's G R G, which matches original pattern. So the pattern appears at columns 10-12 (positions 10-12). Indeed original pattern width 3, placed at rightmost side aligning right edge. So columns 10-12 replicate original three columns. The columns between left pattern (col1-3) and right pattern (col10-12) are filled with edge color (col1) repeated. Check row2: Input left pattern B R B. Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So columns 1-3 B R B unchanged. Columns 4-9? Actually columns 4-9 are B repeated (edge color). Column10? Let's index: 1 B,2 R,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B,11 R,12 B. So columns 4-10 are B (edge). Rightmost three columns 10-12 are B R B? Wait column10 is B, column11 R, column12 B => that's B R B matches pattern. So indeed rightmost three columns start at column10 (since width 12). So gap length = total columns - 2*pattern_width = 12 - 6 = 6? Actually pattern width = 3, two patterns occupy 6 col ... [5404 chars truncated]
"The stage has identical wings on left and right — ornate set pieces frame both sides — and between them, each row of the stage floor glows under a spotlight matching its wing's trim color."
120b: k=2
See: A set piece stands in the left wing, each row trimmed with a consistent border color, and the stage extends bare to the opposite wing.
Do: Build a mirror set piece in the right wing; flood each row of the bare stage with that row's trim color spotlight.
Grid: Same dimensions. Pattern at both edges, interior cells filled with each row's border color.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1 Input grid dimensions? Let's count columns: "G R G . . . . . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows 4. Input has leftmost 3 columns pattern, rest dots (black). Output: same dimensions 4x12. Output shows leftmost 3 columns unchanged? Let's see row1 input: G R G . . . . . . . . . Output row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G. So leftmost three same, then columns 4-10 become G (the row's border color?) Actually row1 border color maybe G? Row1 has pattern G R G at left edge. The border color maybe the outermost leftmost? In row1, leftmost cell G, rightmost? Not present. The row's trim color maybe the color that appears at both ends of the left pattern? In row1 pattern G R G: ends are G. So border color = G. Output row1 after column3, columns 4-10 become G, column11 becomes R, column12 becomes G. Wait column11 is R, column12 G. That matches original pattern maybe mirrored on right side? Let's examine: Input left pattern length 3: positions 1-3: G R G. Output right side (positions 10-12?) Actually output row1: positions: 1 G,2 R,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G,11 R,12 G. So after the left pattern, we have a stretch of G (border color) filling until near end, then the pattern reversed? At the far right we have R G which is the middle and rightmost of original pattern? Actually original pattern G R G, reversed is G R G same. But output rightmost two cells are R G, not G R G. Let's map: maybe they mirror the left pattern onto right side, but overlapping? Let's see row2 input: B R B . . . . . . . . . Output row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B. So left pattern B R B, then many B, then R B at end. So rightmost two cells are R B (mirror of middle and rightmost?). Row3 input: G R G same as row1 output same pattern. Row4 input: B G B output: B G B B B B B B B B G B. Rightmost two: G B. Thus rule: For each row, take the leftmost three cells (pattern). The outermost left cell is border color (call C). Fill the interior (the columns between left pattern and rightmost pattern) with C. Then at the far right, place the middle and rightmost cells of the left pattern (i.e., columns 2 and 3) in order? Let's test: Row1 left pattern: col1 G, col2 R, col3 G. Rightmost two in output are col11 R, col12 G (col2 then col3). Row2: col2 R, col3 B -> output rightmost two: R B. Row4: col2 G, col3 B -> output rightmost two: G B. Yes matches. What about column count? Input width 12, left pattern width 3, right pattern width 2? Actually output rightmost two cells are placed, leaving one column before them filled with border color? In row1, columns 4-10 (7 cells) are G. That's total width 12: 3 left pattern + 7 interior + 2 right pattern =12. So interior length = total width -5. So rule: replicate border color across interior columns (all columns except first three and last two). The last two columns are the middle and rightmost cells of the left pattern. Thus transformation: Mirror set piece: left pattern stays, right side gets trimmed with same b ... [3632 chars truncated]
"Identical topiaries bookend a garden path, and each row of the walkway between them is mulched in the color of the hedgerow that borders it."
120b: k=1
See: An ornamental hedge stands at the garden's left edge, each horizontal layer edged in a unifying color, with bare soil stretching to the right fence.
Do: Plant a mirror hedge at the right fence and spread mulch of each layer's edging color across the bare path between.
Grid: Dimensions unchanged. Pattern mirrored at right; gap filled per-row with outermost color.
We need to infer rule. From description: ornamental hedge left edge each horizontal layer edged in a unifying color, with bare soil stretching to the right fence. Mirror hedge at right fence and spread mulch of each layer's edging color across the bare path between. So input has left side pattern (hedge) with colors, then empty '.' to right. Output: same left pattern unchanged, right side filled with mirror of left pattern (i.e., same pattern reversed horizontally) at far right column? And the gap between filled with the outermost color of each row (the edging color). Let's examine example. Example 1 Input: 4 rows, 12 columns? Let's write rows: Row1: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row2: B R B . . . . . . . . . Row3: G R G . . . . . . . . . Row4: B G B . . . . . . . . . So left pattern occupies first 3 columns (positions 0-2). Then columns 3-11 are '.'. Output rows: Row1: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row2: B R B B B B B B B B R B Row3: G R G G G G G G G G R G Row4: B G B B B B B B B B G B Let's see length: 12 columns as before. Now pattern: leftmost 3 columns unchanged. Rightmost 3 columns? Let's see row1: positions 0-2: G R G same. Positions 9-11? Actually output row1: columns index 0 G,1 R,2 G,3 G,4 G,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 R,11 G. So rightmost three columns (9,10,11) are G,R,G which is mirror of leftmost three? Mirror of G R G is G R G (same). Row2 leftmost: B R B. Rightmost three: B R B (mirror). Row4 leftmost: B G B. Rightmost three: B G B (mirror). So yes mirror placed at right edge. The middle columns (3-8) are filled with a color: row1 they are G (the outermost color? leftmost column is G, rightmost column also G). Row2 middle columns are B (outermost color B). Row3 middle G. Row4 middle B. So they fill with the color of the outermost edge (the leftmost column color). That matches description: spread mulch of each layer's edging color across the bare path between. Thus rule: For each row, identify the leftmost non-'.' color (the "edge" color). The pattern of non-'.' cells on left side (contiguous block) is mirrored to the rightmost side of the row (same width). The interior '.' cells are replaced with the edge color (the leftmost color). The dimensions unchanged. Now test input: Rows (looks 4 rows, 14 columns? Let's count): Row1: G A A G . . . . . . . . . . Indices: 0 G,1 A,2 A,3 G, then 4-13 '.' (10 dots). So left pattern width = 4 columns (0-3). Row2: R B B R . . . . . . . . . . (same width 4). Row3: B G G B . . . . . . . . . . (width 4). Row4: R B B R . . . . . . . . . . (width 4). So pattern is 4 columns. We need to mirror these 4 columns to right edge (last 4 columns). The total columns count: let's count characters: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14 tokens? Let's count: G(1) A2 A3 G4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14? Actually there are 10 dots after G? Let's verify: string: "G A A G . . . . . . . . . ." spaces separate. After G there are 10 '.'? Let's count: tokens after G: . . . . . . . . . . (10). So total tokens = 4 + 10 ... [1985 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 3×3 grid of colored cells. Each cell contains one of several colors, with no special structural constraints — any arrangement of colors is valid.
Do: 1. Start with the original 3×3 grid. 2. Create a horizontal mirror (flip left-to-right) of the original and place it to the right, forming a 3×6 grid. 3. Create a vertical mirror (flip top-to-bottom) of that entire 3×6 grid and place it below, forming the final 6×6 output.
Grid: The input is always a 3×3 grid. The output is always a 6×6 grid — the input tiled with its reflections to produce four-fold symmetry (left-right and top-bottom).
"A stained-glass window unfolds its hidden reflections when the cathedral doors swing open."
120b: k=1
See: A small square of stained glass, three panes across and three down, each shard holding its own color — a fragment of a larger window that has been folded in on itself, concealing its full design.
Do: The window remembers its complete form. First, the glass unfolds to the right, as though a hinged panel swings open to reveal the twin that was always pressed against it face-to-face. Then the entire doubled panel drops its reflection downward, like a window over still water, so that every shard finds its counterpart above and below. The cathedral reveals what symmetry had kept hidden.
Grid: The original fragment is a modest 3×3 piece of stained glass. When the cathedral fully opens its doors and the reflection pool settles beneath, the complete rose window stands 6×6 — four copies of the fragment facing inward like hands pressed together in prayer, symmetric in every direction.
We need to understand transformation. Input 3x3, output 6x6. The description: unfold to the right (mirror horizontally?) then reflection downward (mirror vertically). Essentially create a 2x2 tiling of the original and its mirrored versions? Let's examine example. Input: Row1: R X R Row2: R M Y Row3: R R R Output 6x6: Row1: R X R R X R Row2: R M Y Y M R Row3: R R R R R R Row4: R R R R R R Row5: R M Y Y M R Row6: R X R R X R Let's see pattern. The top-left 3x3 of output equals input? Compare: Output rows1-3 cols1-3: R X R R M Y R R R -> matches input exactly. Now top-right 3x3 (rows1-3 cols4-6): R X R Y M R R R R Is that horizontal mirror of input? Input mirrored horizontally (left-right) would be: R X R (same because symmetric?) Actually input row1: R X R reversed is R X R same. Row2: R M Y reversed is Y M R. Row3: R R R reversed same. So top-right matches that: row1 same, row2 Y M R, row3 same. Yes. Now bottom-left 3x3 (rows4-6 cols1-3): R R R R M Y R X R That's vertical mirror (up-down) of input? Input vertical mirror (top-bottom) would be rows reversed: row3, row2, row1: R R R R M Y R X R matches bottom-left. Bottom-right 3x3 (rows4-6 cols4-6): R R R Y M R R X R That's both horizontal and vertical mirror (i.e., 180 rotation) of input. Indeed. Thus transformation: create a 2x2 block where each quadrant is a copy of the input, mirrored appropriately: top-left original, top-right horizontal mirror, bottom-left vertical mirror, bottom-right both mirrors (i.e., rotate 180). Equivalent to reflecting across both axes to fill 6x6. Thus rule: output size double each dimension, fill with input and its reflections. Now apply to test input: Test Input: B M M X R R R R R Let's denote matrix A (3x3). We'll compute: A: row1: B M M row2: X R R row3: R R R Horizontal mirror (flip left-right) H: row1 reversed: M M B row2: R R X row3: R R R (same) Vertical mirror (flip up-down) V: rows reversed: row1: R R R row2: X R R row3: B M M Both (HV) i.e., rotate 180 (or flip both): reverse rows and reverse each row: Take A, reverse rows order and each row reversed: Original rows reversed: row3, row2, row1 => R R R, X R R, B M M then each reversed: row3 reversed: R R R (same) row2 reversed: R R X row1 reversed: M M B Thus HV matrix: row1: R R R row2: R R X row3: M M B Now construct output 6x6: Top-left (TL) = A Top-right (TR) = H Bottom-left (BL) = V Bottom-right (BR) = HV Let's write rows: Rows 1-3 combine TL and TR side by side. Row1 TL: B M M ; TR: M M B => combined: B M M M M B Row2 TL: X R R ; TR: R R X => X R R R R X Row3 TL: R R R ; TR: R R R => R R R R R R Rows 4-6 combine BL and BR. Row4 BL: R R R ; BR: R R R => R R R R R R Row5 BL: X R R ; BR: R R X => X R R R R X Row6 BL: B M M ; BR: M M B => B M M M M B Thus output grid 6x6. Check symmetry: matches pattern. Now produce answer block with spaces. Answer: B M M M M B X R R R R X R R R R R R R R R R R R X R R R R X B M M M M B Let's ensure using color key let ... [42 chars truncated]
"A cell reaches mitosis, its colorful organelles duplicating in mirror-image as the membrane stretches to encompass two daughters, then the whole embryo folds along a second axis, producing a four-chambered blastula."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small cluster of living pigmented cells, each carrying its own unique protein marker.
Do: The cell undergoes two rounds of symmetric division — first splitting sideways so each daughter mirrors the other, then the entire colony divides along the perpendicular axis, each half a reflection of its twin.
Grid: The original tissue sample is a 3×3 patch. After双 division completes, the organism is a 6×6 colony with perfect bilateral symmetry along both body axes.
"A fragment of a nebula is caught in a gravitational lens that projects its light in four symmetric images around the lensing mass — each quadrant a perfect reflection of the others."
120b: k=3
See: A compact patch of colored stellar material — each cell a differently hued region of gas and dust.
Do: The gravitational lens first creates a lateral mirror image, then the entire doubled image is reflected along the perpendicular axis, producing four symmetric projections of the original fragment.
Grid: The source nebula fragment is 3×3. The lensed image spans 6×6 with four-fold symmetry, as gravitational optics dictate.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 6x6 with four-fold symmetry. Looking at examples. Example1 input: Row1: R X R Row2: R M Y Row3: R R R Output 6x6: Row1: R X R R X R Row2: R M Y Y M R Row3: R R R R R R Row4: R R R R R R Row5: R M Y Y M R Row6: R X R R X R Observations: Output appears to be original 3x3 placed in top-left quadrant? Let's map coordinates. Let input matrix A[i][j] i=0..2, j=0..2. Output B size 6x6. Possibly B is formed by mirroring A horizontally and vertically to create 4 quadrants. Quadrant layout: Top-left (rows0-2, cols0-2) = A. Top-right (rows0-2, cols3-5) = horizontal mirror of A? Let's check: top-right row0: columns3-5 = R X R? Actually row0 output: R X R R X R. So first three are R X R (A row0). Next three are R X R again, which is same as A row0, not mirrored. Wait horizontal mirror of A row0 would be R X R reversed = R X R (same because palindrome). Row1: A row1 = R M Y. Output row1: R M Y Y M R. So top-right part (cols3-5) = Y M R? Actually row1 columns3-5 are Y M R. That's reverse of A row1 (R M Y reversed = Y M R). So top-right is mirror horizontally. Row2: A row2 = R R R. Mirror same. Output row2: R R R R R R (both halves same). So top-right is mirror horizontally. Now bottom-left (rows3-5, cols0-2) appears to be vertical mirror of top-left? Row3 output: R R R (same as row2). Row4: R M Y (same as row1). Row5: R X R (same as row0). So bottom-left is vertical mirror (flip rows). Bottom-right (rows3-5, cols3-5) should be both horizontal and vertical mirror (i.e., rotate 180). Row3 cols3-5 = R R R (same as row2). Row4 cols3-5 = Y M R (mirror of row1). Row5 cols3-5 = R X R (mirror of row0). Indeed matches. Thus rule: Create a 2x2 tiling of the input with mirroring: top-left original, top-right horizontal mirror, bottom-left vertical mirror, bottom-right both mirrors (i.e., 180 rotation). Equivalent to reflect across both axes to fill 6x6. Check Example2. Input: O B X O O B X G B Let's compute top-left = input. Top-right should be horizontal mirror of each row. Row0 input: O B X. Reverse: X B O. Output row0: O B X X B O. Yes matches. Row1: O O B reversed B O O. Output row1: O O B B O O. Yes. Row2: X G B reversed B G X. Output row2: X G B B G X. Yes. Bottom-left rows are vertical mirror: rows reversed order. Row3 (output row3) should be same as row2 (original) i.e., X G B. Indeed output row3: X G B B G X (same as row2). Row4 same as row1. Row5 same as row0. Bottom-right should be both mirrors (i.e., reverse rows and columns). Row3 cols3-5 should be reverse of row2: B G X. Indeed row3: B G X. Row4: B O O matches reverse of row1. Row5: B O? Wait row5: B O? Actually output row5: O B X X B O. Bottom-right part (cols3-5) = X B O which is reverse of row0 O B X. Yes. Thus rule confirmed. Example3 also matches. Thus transformation: Given 3x3 input, output 6x6 where for each cell (i,j) in 0..5, we map to input cell (i%3, j%3) after applying mirroring based on quadrant: if i>=3 then row index = 5 - i (i. ... [2094 chars truncated]
"A signal flag arrangement on the port yardarm is matched by its mirror on the starboard side, and then the whole rigging is reflected in the still water below the hull."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small square of colored signal flags hoisted on one arm of the mast.
Do: The port flags are mirrored to starboard, creating a balanced horizontal display. Then the water's surface reflects the entire arrangement downward, doubling it vertically.
Grid: The original signal hoist is 3×3. The full display — ship and reflection — spans 6×6 with symmetry across both the mast and the waterline.
"A small circuit pattern on one quadrant of a silicon die is lithographically stepped-and-repeated with mirrored exposures to fill the full die area with symmetric interconnects."
120b: k=3
See: A compact 3×3 array of colored circuit elements — each cell a differently doped region or metal trace.
Do: The stepper mirrors the pattern laterally for the adjacent quadrant, then mirrors the combined half-die vertically to complete the full layout.
Grid: The unit cell is 3×3. The completed die is 6×6 with mirror symmetry on both axes, as is standard in balanced IC layout.
We need to infer rule: Input 3x3, output 6x6 with mirroring both axes. Looking at examples. Example1 input: Row1: R X R Row2: R M Y Row3: R R R Output 6x6: Rows: 1: R X R R X R 2: R M Y Y M R 3: R R R R R R 4: R R R R R R 5: R M Y Y M R 6: R X R R X R Observations: Output appears to be input mirrored horizontally to right (i.e., reflect across vertical axis) to make width 6, then the resulting 3x6 top half is mirrored vertically to bottom to make 6x6. Specifically, take input 3x3, create a 3x6 by concatenating input and its horizontal mirror (left-right reversed). Let's test: Input rows: R X R -> reversed: R X R (same palindrome). Concatenated: R X R + R X R = R X R R X R matches row1 output. Good. Row2: R M Y reversed: Y M R. Concatenated: R M Y Y M R matches row2 output. Yes. Row3: R R R reversed: R R R. Concatenated: R R R R R R matches row3 output. Yes. Then vertical mirroring: bottom three rows are rows 3,2,1 of top half? Actually output rows 4-6 are: row4 = row3 (R R R R R R), row5 = row2 (R M Y Y M R), row6 = row1 (R X R R X R). So vertical mirror of the top half (including middle row duplicated). So overall rule: produce a 6x6 symmetric pattern by mirroring input horizontally and then vertically. Check Example2: Input: O B X O O B X G B Horizontal mirror each row: Row1: O B X + X B O = O B X X B O matches output row1. Row2: O O B + B O O = O O B B O O matches row2. Row3: X G B + B G X = X G B B G X matches row3. Then vertical mirror: rows 4-6 are rows 3,2,1 respectively. Output rows 4-6: row4 = X G B B G X (matches), row5 = O O B B O O, row6 = O B X X B O. Yes. Example3: Input: B R B R A B A B M Horizontal mirror: Row1: B R B + B R B = B R B B R B matches output row1. Row2: R A B + B A R = R A B B A R matches row2. Row3: A B M + M B A = A B M M B A matches row3. Vertical mirror: rows 4-6 are rows 3,2,1. Output rows 4-6: row4 = A B M M B A, row5 = R A B B A R, row6 = B R B B R B. Yes. Thus rule is clear. Now apply to test input: Test Input: B M M X R R R R R Let's compute horizontal mirror for each row. Row1: B M M. Reverse: M M B. Concatenate: B M M M M B? Wait careful: original row: B M M. Reverse: M M B. Concatenated: B M M + M M B = B M M M M B. So row1 output top half: B M M M M B. Row2: X R R. Reverse: R R X. Concatenate: X R R R R X = X R R R R X. Row3: R R R. Reverse: R R R. Concatenate: R R R R R R = R R R R R R. Now vertical mirror: rows 4-6 are rows 3,2,1 respectively. Row4 = row3: R R R R R R Row5 = row2: X R R R R X Row6 = row1: B M M M M B Thus final 6x6 grid: Row1: B M M M M B Row2: X R R R R X Row3: R R R R R R Row4: R R R R R R Row5: X R R R R X Row6: B M M M M B Check consistency with pattern: symmetrical. Now produce answer block with spaces between characters. Answer: B M M M M B X R R R R X R R R R R R R R R R R R X R R R R X B M M M M B Make sure using color key letters as given. Now produce final response.
"A god gazes into twin divine mirrors — the Mirror of East-and-West and the Mirror of Sky-and-Earth — and sees a single sacred glyph multiplied into a mandala of four perfect reflections."
120b: k=3
See: A small sacred tablet inscribed with colored runes, each in its appointed position within a square.
Do: The Mirror of East-and-West reveals the tablet's lateral twin. Then the Mirror of Sky-and-Earth reflects the whole vision, so the glyph appears in four orientations forming a holy mandala.
Grid: The original tablet is 3×3. The divine mandala spans 6×6 with the fourfold symmetry of cosmic balance.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 6x6. Description: Mirror East-and-West (horizontal mirror?) then Mirror Sky-and-Earth (vertical mirror?) So produce four orientations: original, east-west mirror (horizontal flip), then vertical flip of whole? Actually "Mirror of East-and-West reveals the tablet's lateral twin." That suggests reflect left-right (horizontal mirror). Then "Mirror of Sky-and-Earth reflects the whole vision, so the glyph appears in four orientations forming a holy mandala." So after first mirror, we have original and its left-right mirror side by side? Then reflect whole vertically to get bottom half. So final 6x6 is composed of 2x2 blocks each 3x3: top-left original, top-right left-right mirror, bottom-left vertical mirror of original (i.e., up-down flip), bottom-right vertical mirror of left-right mirror (which is both flips, i.e., 180 rotation). Let's test with examples. Example1 input: R X R R M Y R R R Compute left-right mirror: flip columns: R X R -> same because symmetric? Actually row1: R X R reversed = R X R same. Row2: R M Y reversed = Y M R. Row3: R R R reversed = R R R. Now construct 6x6: top-left original, top-right LR mirror, bottom-left UD mirror (flip rows), bottom-right both flips. Let's compute. Original (O): [ [R,X,R], [R,M,Y], [R,R,R] ] LR (L): [ [R,X,R], [Y,M,R], [R,R,R] ] UD (U) = flip O vertically (reverse row order): [ [R,R,R], [R,M,Y], [R,X,R] ] Both (B) = flip L vertically (or rotate 180). Let's compute L flipped vertically: Rows reversed: [ [R,R,R], [Y,M,R], [R,X,R] ] Now assemble 6x6: rows 0-2 top half, rows 3-5 bottom half. Each row consists of left block + right block. Row0: O row0 + L row0 = R X R | R X R => "R X R R X R" matches output row1: "R X R R X R". Yes. Row1: O row1 + L row1 = R M Y | Y M R => "R M Y Y M R" matches output row2: "R M Y Y M R". Yes. Row2: O row2 + L row2 = R R R | R R R => "R R R R R R" matches output row3: "R R R R R R". Yes. Row3: U row0 + B row0 = R R R | R R R => "R R R R R R" matches output row4: "R R R R R R". Yes. Row4: U row1 + B row1 = R M Y | Y M R => "R M Y Y M R" matches output row5: "R M Y Y M R". Yes. Row5: U row2 + B row2 = R X R | R X R => "R X R R X R" matches output row6: "R X R R X R". Yes. Thus rule confirmed. Check Example2. Input: O B X O O B X G B Compute O matrix. LR mirror: reverse each row. Row0 O: O B X -> reversed X B O Row1: O O B -> B O O Row2: X G B -> B G X Now UD (vertical flip of O): rows reversed: Row0: X G B Row1: O O B Row2: O B X Both (vertical flip of LR): rows reversed of LR: Row0: B G X Row1: B O O Row2: X B O Now assemble. Top rows: Row0: O row0 + LR row0 = O B X | X B O => "O B X X B O" matches output row1: O B X X B O. Yes. Row1: O row1 + LR row1 = O O B | B O O => "O O B B O O" matches output row2. Yes. Row2: O row2 + LR row2 = X G B | B G X => "X G B B G X" matches output row3. Yes. Bottom rows: Row3: UD row0 + Both row0 = X G B | B G X => same ... [1416 chars truncated]
"A choreographer blocks three rows of dancers in colored costumes on one side of the stage, then calls 'mirror!' — the formation replicates to the opposite wing. Then 'echo!' — the whole company repeats the shape in reverse from back to front."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A compact square formation of dancers, each wearing a distinctly colored costume at their assigned floor mark.
Do: The formation is mirrored laterally so the right wing reflects the left. Then the entire doubled line is mirrored front-to-back, so the rear rows echo the front.
Grid: The original formation is 3×3 dancers. The full company fills a 6×6 floor pattern with perfect reflective symmetry on both stage axes.
"A crystal seed grows by twinning — first extending a mirror lattice along one axis, then repeating the twin operation along the perpendicular axis, until the unit cell has propagated into a four-fold symmetric crystal face."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small unit cell of colored mineral inclusions, each species occupying a unique lattice site within the square seed.
Do: The crystal twins laterally, mirroring each inclusion to create a doubled cell. Then the entire structure twins vertically, producing a four-quadrant crystal face where every inclusion has three symmetry-related copies.
Grid: The seed crystal is 3×3. The twinned crystal face is 6×6 with the characteristic bilateral symmetry of a twinned mineral specimen.
"A chef folds a thin crêpe of colored batter — first in half one way, then in half the other — but here you must imagine the folding in reverse, opening the crêpe out to reveal every layer's imprint on the surface."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small square of dough decorated with dabs of colored filling, each dollop in its own position.
Do: Unfold the crêpe sideways first, revealing that each colored mark has left its twin on the other side. Then unfold downward, so the top pattern stamps its reflection onto the bottom half.
Grid: The folded crêpe is 3×3. The fully unfolded pastry reveals a 6×6 surface where every colored mark appears in four symmetric positions.
"A short motif played by an ensemble is answered by its retrograde inversion — first the melody is reversed in pitch across a horizontal mirror, then the whole passage is palindromed in time."
120b: k=1
See: A compact three-by-three arrangement of instrumental voices, each cell a distinct tonal color.
Do: First, the motif is played alongside its horizontal retrograde, doubling the width. Then the entire phrase is followed by its temporal inversion, doubling the length — so the piece ends as it began.
Grid: The original score is a 3×3 grid of voices. The full performed composition is a 6×6 score with perfect symmetry in both directions.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 6x6 symmetric both horizontally and vertically, formed by original plus its horizontal retrograde (mirror) to double width, then followed by its temporal inversion (vertical mirror?) to double length, so final piece ends as it began. Let's examine example. Input grid: Row1: R X R Row2: R M Y Row3: R R R Output 6x6: Row1: R X R R X R Row2: R M Y Y M R Row3: R R R R R R Row4: R R R R R R Row5: R M Y Y M R Row6: R X R R X R Observations: Output first three columns correspond to original? Let's see first three columns of output rows 1-3: they are exactly input rows 1-3. Indeed row1 col1-3: R X R matches input row1. Row2 col1-3: R M Y matches input row2. Row3 col1-3: R R R matches input row3. Now columns 4-6 appear to be horizontal retrograde (mirror) of first three columns. Row1 col4-6: R X R (mirror of R X R) but reversed order? Input row1 is R X R, reversed is R X R (palindrome). Row2: input row2 R M Y reversed Y M R, but output row2 col4-6 is Y M R indeed. Row3: input row3 R R R reversed same. Thus first three rows are original + its horizontal mirror to make width 6. Now rows 4-6 appear to be vertical mirror (temporal inversion) of rows 1-3 (i.e., flip vertically). Row4 equals row3 (R R R R R R). Row5 equals row2 (R M Y Y M R). Row6 equals row1 (R X R R X R). So the output is symmetric vertically as well. Thus rule: Given N x N input (here 3x3), produce 2N x 2N output where top-left quadrant is original, top-right is horizontal mirror of original (each row reversed), bottom-left is vertical mirror of original (rows reversed), bottom-right is both mirrors (i.e., 180-degree rotation) which matches vertical+horizontal. But in example, bottom-right equals top-left? Let's check bottom-right quadrant (rows 4-6, cols 4-6). Row4 col4-6: R R R (same as row3 col1-3). Row5 col4-6: Y M R (mirror of row2). Row6 col4-6: R X R (mirror of row1). So indeed bottom-right is both mirrors. Thus transformation: output size 2N x 2N, where output[i][j] = input[i][j] for i<N, j<N; output[i][j] = input[i][2N-1-j] for i<N, j>=N (mirror horizontally); output[i][j] = input[2N-1-i][j] for i>=N, j<N (mirror vertically); output[i][j] = input[2N-1-i][2N-1-j] for i>=N, j>=N. Now apply to test input: Test Input: B M M X R R R R R Let's label rows 0-2, cols 0-2. Row0: B M M Row1: X R R Row2: R R R Now produce 6x6. Top-left (rows0-2, cols0-2) same. Top-right (rows0-2, cols3-5) = horizontal mirror of each row (reverse order). Row0 reversed: M M B. Row1 reversed: R R X. Row2 reversed: R R R. Bottom-left (rows3-5, cols0-2) = vertical mirror of rows (reverse row order). Row2 becomes row3, Row1 row4, Row0 row5. Thus rows3-5 left part: Row3 (i=3) corresponds to original row2: R R R Row4 corresponds to original row1: X R R Row5 corresponds to original row0: B M M Bottom-right (rows3-5, cols3-5) = both mirrors (i.e., reverse both). Equivalent to taking original rows reversed and columns reversed. So we can ... [665 chars truncated]
"A coach diagrams a play on a quarter of the field, then tells both wings to run the mirror-image of each other, and both halves of the field to execute the same symmetric formation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small tactical diagram showing colored player positions on a compact square of the field.
Do: Copy the play to the right side of the field as a mirror image. Then reflect the entire formation to the other half of the pitch so both ends match.
Grid: The coach's original diagram is 3×3. The full-field formation spans 6×6 with identical mirrored structure in every quadrant.
"A small storm system meets its own reflection at a pressure boundary, then the entire doubled front collides with an identical system arriving from the opposite latitude."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A compact weather cell — colored bands of temperature, moisture, and wind packed into a tight square formation.
Do: The storm encounters a vertical pressure wall that bounces its pattern sideways, creating a mirror twin. Then the combined system hits a horizontal jet stream that reflects the whole formation downward.
Grid: The initial cell is 3×3. The resulting mega-system covers a 6×6 area with four-fold meteorological symmetry.
"A master mason carves one corner block of an ornamental ceiling tile, knowing the mold will be pressed four ways to produce the full rosette."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A square corner piece with colored stone inlays, each occupying a distinct position within the small slab.
Do: The corner block is flipped to create its lateral twin, then the paired blocks are flipped again along the perpendicular axis, so every inlay appears in four rotationally related positions.
Grid: The carved corner is 3×3. The completed ceiling tile is 6×6, a symmetric rosette born from a single quarter-pattern.
"A general positions a vanguard in one quadrant of the battlefield, then deploys identical mirror-formations to guard every flank — what threatens from the east is matched from the west, what advances from the north is echoed from the south."
120b: k=2
See: A small square battle formation of colored regiment banners, each unit holding a unique position.
Do: Mirror the vanguard sideways to create a matched flank. Then mirror the entire line north-to-south so the rearguard perfectly echoes the front.
Grid: The vanguard occupies a 3×3 square. The full deployment covers 6×6 with defensive symmetry on both axes.
We need to infer rule. Input is 3x3, output is 6x6. The description: "Mirror the vanguard sideways to create a matched flank. Then mirror the entire line north-to-south so the rearguard perfectly echoes the front." So likely we take the 3x3 block, mirror horizontally (left-right) to make a 3x6? Actually "mirror sideways" could mean reflect across vertical axis, creating a symmetric left-right pattern: original 3x3 on left, its mirror on right, making 3x6. Then "mirror the entire line north-to-south" meaning reflect the 3x6 across horizontal axis to produce bottom half, making 6x6. Thus output is 6x6 where top half is original 3x3 + its horizontal mirror, bottom half is vertical mirror of top half (i.e., top half flipped vertically). Let's test with Example1. Input1: R X R R M Y R R R Create horizontal mirror: For each row, take original row then its reverse? Let's compute. Row1: R X R. Reverse is R X R (same). So combined: R X R R X R. Output top row is R X R R X R. Yes matches. Row2: R M Y. Reverse: Y M R. Combined: R M Y Y M R. Output row2: R M Y Y M R. Yes. Row3: R R R. Reverse: R R R. Combined: R R R R R R. Output row3: R R R R R R. Yes. Now vertical mirror: Take top three rows and reflect vertically (i.e., reverse order) to produce bottom three rows. So row4 should be row3, row5 row2, row6 row1. Output rows 4-6: row4 = R R R R R R (matches), row5 = R M Y Y M R (matches), row6 = R X R R X R (matches). Yes. Example2: Input: O B X O O B X G B Horizontal mirror rows: Row1: O B X + reverse X B O => O B X X B O matches output row1. Row2: O O B + reverse B O O => O O B B O O matches output row2. Row3: X G B + reverse B G X => X G B B G X matches output row3. Then vertical mirror: rows 4-6 are rows 3-1 respectively. Output rows 4-6: row4 = X G B B G X (matches), row5 = O O B B O O (matches), row6 = O B X X B O (matches). Good. Thus rule confirmed. Now apply to test input: Test Input: B M M X R R R R R Let's compute. Row1: B M M. Reverse: M M B. Combined: B M M M M B? Wait combine original then reverse: B M M + M M B = B M M M M B. That's 6 elements: B M M M M B. Row2: X R R. Reverse: R R X. Combined: X R R R R X. Row3: R R R. Reverse: R R R. Combined: R R R R R R. Now vertical mirror: bottom three rows are rows 3,2,1. Row4 = row3: R R R R R R Row5 = row2: X R R R R X Row6 = row1: B M M M M B Thus final 6x6 grid: Row1: B M M M M B Row2: X R R R R X Row3: R R R R R R Row4: R R R R R R Row5: X R R R R X Row6: B M M M M B Check consistency with pattern. Now produce answer block with spaces. Answer: B M M M M B X R R R R X R R R R R R R R R R R R X R R R R X B M M M M B Let's ensure color codes: B blue, M magenta, X grey, R red. Good. Now produce final.
"A troupe rehearses a tableau in one corner of the stage, then the director calls for the scene to be performed simultaneously by mirror-casts on both wings, and again by shadow-casts above on a raised platform."
120b: k=3
See: A small square stage with costumed performers in colored costumes, each at a distinct mark.
Do: The cast is doubled with a mirrored troupe extending the scene to the right. Then the entire doubled tableau is reflected upward, filling the full stage with four symmetric performances.
Grid: The rehearsal block is 3×3. Opening night fills a 6×6 stage with perfect bilateral symmetry in both dimensions.
We need to infer transformation: Input 3x3, output 6x6. The description: "cast is doubled with a mirrored troupe extending the scene to the right. Then the entire doubled tableau is reflected upward, filling the full stage with four symmetric performances." So likely we take the input grid, create a horizontal mirror (left-right) to double width, then vertical mirror (top-bottom) to double height, resulting in 2x2 tiling with mirrored copies. Specifically, output appears to be 6x6 where top-left quadrant is original? Let's examine Example1. Input1: Row1: R X R Row2: R M Y Row3: R R R Output rows (6): 1: R X R R X R 2: R M Y Y M R 3: R R R R R R 4: R R R R R R 5: R M Y Y M R 6: R X R R X R Let's split output into quadrants 3x3 each. Top-left (rows1-3, cols1-3): R X R R M Y R R R -> matches input exactly. Top-right (rows1-3, cols4-6): R X R Y M R R R R Is that a horizontal mirror of input? Mirror left-right of input would be: reverse each row: Row1: R X R reversed = R X R (same because symmetric). Row2: R M Y reversed = Y M R. Row3: R R R reversed = R R R. Indeed top-right matches that: Row1 R X R, Row2 Y M R, Row3 R R R. Yes. Bottom-left (rows4-6, cols1-3): R R R R M Y R X R That's vertical mirror (top-bottom) of top-left? Input reversed rows: Row3, Row2, Row1: R R R, R M Y, R X R. Yes matches. Bottom-right (rows4-6, cols4-6): R R R Y M R R X R That's both horizontal and vertical mirror (i.e., rotate 180? Actually mirror both axes). Should be mirror of input both ways: reverse rows and reverse each row: Row3 reversed = R R R, Row2 reversed = Y M R, Row1 reversed = R X R. Yes matches. Thus rule: output is 2x2 tiling where each tile is a reflection: top-left original, top-right horizontal mirror, bottom-left vertical mirror, bottom-right both. Check Example2. Input2: O B X O O B X G B Compute horizontal mirror: reverse each row: Row1: X B O Row2: B O O Row3: B G X Vertical mirror: rows reversed: Row1: X G B Row2: O O B Row3: O B X Both: reverse rows then reverse each row: Row1: B G X reversed? Wait start with bottom row X G B reversed = B G X. Row2: O O B reversed = B O O. Row3: O B X reversed = X B O. Now output given: Rows: 1: O B X X B O 2: O O B B O O 3: X G B B G X 4: X G B B G X 5: O O B B O O 6: O B X X B O Let's split quadrants 3x3. Top-left rows1-3 cols1-3: O B X O O B X G B -> matches input. Top-right rows1-3 cols4-6: X B O B O O B G X -> matches horizontal mirror. Bottom-left rows4-6 cols1-3: X G B O O B O B X -> matches vertical mirror. Bottom-right rows4-6 cols4-6: B G X B O O X B O -> matches both. Thus rule confirmed. Example3 also matches. Thus for test input: Input: B M M X R R R R R We need to produce 6x6 output. Let's compute. Original (top-left) = same. Horizontal mirror: reverse each row. Row1: B M M reversed = M M B Row2: X R R reversed = R R X Row3: R R R reversed = R R R Vertical mirror: reverse rows order. Rows reversed: Row3, Row2, Row1: Row3: R R R Row2: X R R Row1: B M M ... [1147 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants one corner of a formal parterre, then lets the pattern propagate by reflection — hedgerows mirror left to right, then the whole bed mirrors top to bottom, creating the classic four-quadrant knot garden."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small square planting bed with flowers of different colors arranged in a simple pattern.
Do: Extend the bed rightward by planting the mirror image of each row. Then extend the combined bed downward by mirroring the whole arrangement, so each bloom has three symmetric siblings.
Grid: The planted corner is 3×3. The completed parterre is 6×6 with the formal bilateral symmetry of a French garden.
See: The input grid contains exactly two non-black colored shapes on a black background. Each shape is a distinct color. One shape is larger (occupies more cells) and the other is smaller. Both shapes fit within a 3×3 bounding box. The larger shape has empty (black) cells within its 3×3 bounding box that form a cavity, and the smaller shape's colored cells exactly correspond to that cavity pattern.
Do: 1. Identify the two colored shapes in the input grid. 2. Determine each shape's bounding box. Both will fit within a 3×3 region. 3. Extract each shape into a 3×3 grid, recording which cells are filled (colored) and which are empty (black). 4. Identify the larger shape (the one with more colored cells). 5. Overlay the two shapes into a single 3×3 output grid: place the larger shape's color in all cells it occupies, and place the smaller shape's color in the remaining cells (which are the empty/cavity cells of the larger shape). The smaller shape's filled cells exactly fill the gaps of the larger shape.
Grid: The output grid is always 3×3. Each cell contains one of the two colors from the input shapes. There are no black cells in the output — the two shapes together completely tile the 3×3 grid.
"Two puzzle pieces, cast from the same mold, find each other and become whole."
120b: k=1
See: Two lonely fragments drift in a vast dark ocean, each a different hue. One is the bigger sibling — nearly complete but riddled with holes, like a key missing its teeth. The other is the smaller sibling — just a few bright cells, shaped exactly like what the bigger one is missing. They are two halves of the same breath.
Do: The smaller fragment hears the larger one calling and swims into its wounds. Every gap in the bigger sibling is a socket waiting for the smaller one's bones. Nest them together: the larger fragment keeps its color wherever it was whole, and the smaller fragment fills every void with its own color, like mortar between bricks. They fuse into one solid body, no darkness left between them.
Grid: The fused body is a compact 3×3 tile — fully healed, no black scars remaining. Every cell glows with one of the two original colors: the dominant sibling's color where it was strong, the smaller sibling's color where it was needed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is 10x10 grid with many black '.' and some colored cells. Output is 3x3 grid. The description: larger fragment (bigger sibling) is nearly complete but riddled with holes, like a key missing its teeth. Smaller fragment is just a few bright cells, shaped exactly like what the larger one is missing. They are two halves of the same breath. The smaller fragment fills the gaps. Thus we need to find two shapes: one larger shape of one color, mostly solid but with holes (black cells) that correspond to shape of smaller fragment of another color. Then output is the combined shape (3x3) where larger color fills its original cells, and smaller color fills the holes. In example 1: Input shows M (magenta) and Y (yellow). Let's map coordinates. 10x10 grid. Let's locate M cells: rows (0-index). Row0: none. Row1: none. Row2: columns 3,4,5 are M. Row3: columns 3,4 are M. Row4: column5 is M. That's a shape like a small L? Let's draw 5x? Actually shape: positions: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5) (3,3)(3,4) (4,5) That's like a shape with missing cells at (3,5) and (4,3)(4,4). The Y cells: row0 col8? Wait Y at (0,8). Row1 col8,9 Y Y. So Y shape is a 2x2 block? Actually coordinates: (0,8) Y, (1,8) Y, (1,9) Y. That's like an L shape of three cells: a 2x2 missing one corner (top-left?). Let's see shape: cells at (0,8), (1,8), (1,9). That's like a small L shape (like missing (0,9)). The description says smaller fragment shaped exactly like what the larger one is missing. So the missing cells in M shape should match Y shape (maybe after translation/rotation?). Let's compute missing cells in M shape within its bounding box? M shape bounding box rows 2-4, cols 3-5 (size 3x3). Within that 3x3, cells present: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5); (3,3)(3,4); (4,5). Missing cells: (3,5), (4,3), (4,4). That's three cells forming an L shape (like Y shape). Indeed Y shape is three cells L shape. So Y shape matches missing cells shape. Thus output 3x3 tile corresponds to the bounding box of larger shape (3x3). Fill with M where M existed, Y where missing. Output given: M M M Y M M Y Y M Let's map: rows correspond to bounding box rows 2-4, cols 3-5. Fill: row2: M M M matches. row3: Y M M (since missing at (3,5) becomes Y). row4: Y Y M (missing at (4,3),(4,4) become Y). Yes matches. Thus rule: Identify the larger shape (color that appears more cells within its minimal bounding rectangle) that is mostly filled except some missing cells. Identify the smaller shape (different color) that matches the pattern of missing cells (same shape). Then output the combined 3x3 (or whatever size) rectangle of the larger shape's bounding box, with missing cells filled by smaller color. Now test input: we have colors R (red) and A (azure). Let's locate them. Input grid 10x10. Rows index 0-9. Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2: ". . . . R . . . . ." => R at (2,4) Row3: ". . . R R . . . . ." => R at (3,3) and (3,4) Row4: all . Row5: all . Row6: ". . . . . . . A A ." => A at (6,7),(6,8) ... [7099 chars truncated]
"Two organisms, one dominant and one recessive, share the same niche. Where the dominant species cannot reach, the recessive flourishes — together they saturate every corner of the habitat."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two differently-colored colonies drift across a vast dark petri dish. One colony is robust and widespread; the other is smaller and seems to mirror the gaps of the first.
Do: Extract the shared habitat — a small region where both colonies belong. The dominant organism claims its territory first, and the recessive organism fills every crevice the dominant one left open, until no empty space remains.
Grid: A compact culture plate where every cell is colonized — the dominant species in its color, the recessive in its own, with no sterile gaps.
"Two nebulae of different spectra drift into the same region of space. The larger nebula claims most of the void, but the smaller one condenses into every pocket the larger one left empty — together they fill the sky."
120b: fail
See: Two luminous bodies of different colors float in a vast dark cosmos. One is more expansive; the other is compact, its shape eerily complementary to the gaps of the first.
Do: Both nebulae collapse into a single compact stellar nursery. The larger nebula occupies its natural region, and the smaller one fills every remaining void, until no darkness persists in the frame.
Grid: A small, dense star map — every cell glowing in one spectral color or the other, no dark space left.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input is 10x10 grid with many empty (.) and some colored clusters. Output is 3x3 grid (maybe minimal bounding box covering both shapes after transformation). The description: two luminous bodies of different colors, one larger, one smaller complementary shape (like holes). They collapse into a single compact shape filling all cells, no empty. So likely we take two shapes (different colors) that are non-overlapping, one larger shape and one smaller shape that fits into the gaps of larger shape (like complement). Then we overlay them to fill a 3x3 region? Let's examine Example1. Input: colors M (magenta) and Y (yellow). Let's locate them. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows 0-9. Row0: Y at col8. Row1: Y at col8,9. Rows2: M at col3,4,5. Row3: M at col4,5. Row4: M at col5. So M shape is like a triangle? Let's draw 5x? coordinates: M cells: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5); (3,4)(3,5); (4,5). That's a right triangle shape (like a 3x3 lower-left? Actually shape of a diagonal line). Y cells: (0,8); (1,8)(1,9). That's a small L shape? Actually Y shape is like a 2x2 missing one? coordinates: (0,8) top, (1,8) below, (1,9) right. That's also a small L shape. Output 3x3: M M M Y M M Y Y M Let's see arrangement: 3x3 grid with M and Y. This looks like overlay of the two shapes combined into a 3x3 block where M occupies most cells, Y occupies some cells (the complement). The pattern matches: M shape is like a triangle covering top row all M, second row last two M, third row last M. Y shape occupies bottom-left corner? Actually output grid: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M So Y occupies (1,0), (2,0), (2,1). That's a small L shape (mirrored). M occupies rest. Now compare to original shapes: M shape originally was a triangle oriented with right angle at top-left? Let's visualize original M shape coordinates relative: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5) top row of shape length3; (3,4)(3,5) second row length2 shifted right by1; (4,5) third row length1 shifted right by2. That's a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Actually shape looks like: Row0: *** (cols 3-5) Row1: ** (cols 4-5) Row2: * (col5) That's a triangle with right angle at top-left? The right angle would be at (2,3) maybe? The shape is like a right triangle sloping down-right. Now output M shape occupies top row all three, second row last two, third row last one. That's same orientation as original M shape! So M shape preserved orientation and size, placed in top-left of 3x3? Actually output M occupies positions (0,0-2), (1,1-2), (2,2). That's same pattern as original M but shifted to top-left corner of 3x3. Indeed original M shape pattern matches that. Now Y shape original: coordinates (0,8); (1,8)(1,9). That's shape: top row single cell, second row two cells (forming L shape). That's like a small L shape oriented with right angle at bottom-left? Actually shape pattern: row0 col0; row1 col0, col1. That's like a shape that in output occupies (1,0) and (2,0)(2,1). That's ... [12323 chars truncated]
"Two currents of different temperatures converge in a narrow strait — the warm current claims most of the channel, but the cold current threads into every gap the warm one leaves, until the strait runs full."
120b: k=1
See: Two bodies of water in distinct colors drift across a dark ocean. One current is broader; the other is a narrow stream whose path mirrors the empty channels of the first.
Do: Both currents funnel into a small strait. The dominant current fills its natural flow, and the minor current rushes into every remaining channel, until the entire passage is water with no dead zones.
Grid: A compact strait cross-section — every cell flowing with one current color or the other, no stagnant voids.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 10x10 with some colored shapes. Output is 3x3 grid. So transformation extracts a region? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (10x10). Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: . . . . . . . . Y . Row1: . . . . . . . . Y Y Row2: . . . M M M . . . . Row3: . . . . M M . . . . Row4: . . . . . M . . . . Rows5-9 all dots. So there is a cluster of M (magenta) forming a shape like a triangle? Coordinates: (2,3-5) three Ms, (3,4-5) two Ms, (4,5) one M. That's like a right triangle pointing down-right? Also Y's at (0,8) and (1,8-9). So Y's form a vertical line of two then a horizontal? Actually Y at (0,8) and (1,8) and (1,9). So shape like an L. Output 3x3: M M M Y M M Y Y M Let's see this output corresponds to overlapping of the two shapes? The output grid seems to combine the two currents: maybe fill the convex hull? Let's map output coordinates: 3x3 grid with top row MMM, middle row YMM, bottom row YYM. This looks like the shape formed by taking the union of the two shapes after aligning them such that they share a corner? The pattern resembles a "strait" where one color dominates (M) and the other fills remaining spaces (Y). In output, M occupies most cells, Y occupies lower-left triangle. In input, M shape is larger (broader current) and Y shape is narrower (stream). The description: "Two bodies of water in distinct colors drift across a dark ocean. One current is broader; the other is a narrow stream whose path mirrors the empty channels of the first. Both currents funnel into a small strait. The dominant current fills its natural flow, and the minor current rushes into every remaining channel, until the entire passage is water with no dead zones." Interpretation: We have two colored shapes (broad and narrow). They are oriented such that they converge into a small region (strait). The output is that region, with the dominant color filling its natural shape, and the minor color filling the rest (i.e., the complement within the bounding shape). So we need to extract the overlapping region where they would meet? In example, the M shape is like a diagonal line of three then two then one (like a triangle). The Y shape is like a vertical line of two then a horizontal extension to the right (like an L). If we overlay them such that the tip of Y aligns with the tip of M? Let's see output: 3x3 grid where M occupies a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Actually output grid: positions: (0,0) M, (0,1) M, (0,2) M (1,0) Y, (1,1) M, (1,2) M (2,0) Y, (2,1) Y, (2,2) M So M occupies rightmost column all three, plus top row all three, plus middle (1,1). That's like a shape of a right triangle with right angle at bottom-left? Actually shape of M is like an L rotated? Y occupies lower-left triangle (including (2,0),(2,1),(1,0)). So overall the 3x3 is fully filled (no empty). The pattern resembles the union of the two shapes after aligning them such that they share the corner at bottom-right? Let's th ... [9995 chars truncated]
"Two circuit traces of different voltages are routed onto the same chip. The primary trace claims most of the die area, but the secondary trace fills every unused pad — the chip has no unconnected nodes."
120b: k=1
See: Two signal patterns in different colors are laid out across a dark circuit board. One pattern is more extensive; the other is smaller, its traces fitting precisely into the unused pads of the first.
Do: Route both patterns onto a single compact chip. The primary signal claims its pads, and the secondary signal fills every remaining connection point, leaving no unconnected node on the die.
Grid: A small, fully-routed chip — every pad carrying one signal color or the other, no floating nodes.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 10x10 grid with some colored cells: Y and M. Output is 3x3 grid with M and Y. So rule extracts overlapping patterns? Let's map positions. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1: I'll list coordinates with colors. Row0: col8 Y Row1: col8 Y, col9 Y Row2: col3 M, col4 M, col5 M Row3: col4 M, col5 M Row4: col5 M Other rows empty. So pattern: a larger shape of M (magenta) maybe like a triangle? And Y shape maybe like a line? Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M So output seems to be the minimal bounding box that contains both patterns, with overlapping? Let's see bounding box of all colored cells: min row =0, max row=4, min col=3, max col=9? Actually Y at col8-9 rows0-1. M at cols3-5 rows2-4. So bounding box rows0-4, cols3-9 => size 5x7. But output is 3x3, not that. Maybe rule: overlay the two patterns after cropping each to its own minimal bounding box, then combine where one fills empty cells of other? The description: primary signal claims its pads, secondary fills remaining connection points, leaving no unconnected node. So maybe we take the larger pattern as primary, then fill its empty cells with the smaller pattern's shape, aligning such that the smaller fits into the "unused pads" of the larger. In example, larger pattern likely M (more extensive). Smaller pattern Y (fits into unused pads). The output shows a combined shape where M occupies most cells, Y occupies some cells where M not present? Let's see output grid: positions (0,0)-(0,2): M M M. Row1: Y M M. Row2: Y Y M. So M occupies a right triangle shape (upper left? Actually M at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(1,2),(2,2). That's like a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Y occupies (1,0),(2,0),(2,1). So combined they fill a 3x3 block completely (no empty). So rule: take the convex hull? Actually they fill all cells. Thus the output is a 3x3 fully filled block where each cell is colored either M or Y, with M taking the "primary" shape (maybe the shape that appears more times) and Y filling the rest. So we need to extract the shape of each color, then overlay them to produce a compact shape with no empty cells, preserving relative arrangement? In example, the relative arrangement of M and Y in input: M shape is like a diagonal line from (2,3)-(4,5) maybe shape of a right triangle? Y shape is a 2x2 L shape at top right? Let's map relative positions: M coordinates relative to its bounding box (rows2-4, cols3-5). Within that 3x3 box, M occupies: (0,0? actually row2 col3) that's top-left of box. Let's define box rows2-4, cols3-5. Coordinates inside box (r,c): Row2 (r0): col3 (c0) M, col4 (c1) M, col5 (c2) M => row0 all M. Row3 (r1): col3 empty, col4 M, col5 M => row1: . M M Row4 (r2): col3 empty, col4 empty, col5 M => row2: . . M That's exactly the M pattern in output! Good. So M pattern is its minimal bounding box shape. Now Y pattern: Y coordinates rows0-1, cols8-9. Bounding box rows0-1, cols8-9 (2x2). Inside t ... [8667 chars truncated]
"Twin gods share dominion over a single realm — the elder claims most of the territory, but the younger inhabits every shadow the elder cannot reach. Together their power blankets the land."
120b: k=1
See: Two divine presences of different auras wander a vast dark void. One deity is mightier, covering more ground; the other is smaller, its influence shaped to fill the exact gaps the first leaves.
Do: Both deities converge upon a single small domain. The elder god claims its territory, and the younger god fills every remaining pocket, until the entire realm pulses with divine energy and no void remains.
Grid: A compact divine realm — every cell suffused with one deity's color or the other, no mortal darkness left.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with many '.' (black) and some colored cells: Y (yellow) and M (magenta). Output is a 3x3 grid with M and Y only. So transformation extracts a region where two deities (colors) interact? Let's examine input example. Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input rows: 0: . . . . . . . . Y . 1: . . . . . . . . Y Y 2: . . . M M M . . . . 3: . . . . M M . . . . 4: . . . . . M . . . . 5-9 all dots. So there is a cluster of M forming a shape, and Y cluster to right top. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M So output seems to be a minimal bounding box that contains both colors? Let's find bounding box of all non-'.' cells in input. M cells coordinates: (2,3),(2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5),(4,5). Y cells: (0,8),(1,8),(1,9). Bounding box: min row =0, max row=4, min col=3? Wait Y col 8, M min col 3. So min col =3, max col =9? Actually Y max col 9. So bounding box rows 0-4, cols 3-9 => size 5 rows x7 cols. Not 3x3. But output is 3x3. Maybe they compress each color region into a shape? Perhaps they overlay the two shapes after aligning them? The description: "Two divine presences of different auras wander a vast dark void. One deity is mightier, covering more ground; the other is smaller, its influence shaped to fill the exact gaps the first leaves. Both deities converge upon a single small domain. The elder god claims its territory, and the younger god fills every remaining pocket, until the entire realm pulses with divine energy and no void remains." Interpretation: Larger shape (elder) is placed, then smaller shape fills the gaps (holes) left by larger shape, within a small domain (maybe the intersection of their bounding boxes?). The output shows combined fill: elder's color (maybe M) occupies its shape, and younger (Y) fills remaining empty cells within the minimal rectangle that encloses both shapes? Let's test: Take rectangle that tightly bounds both shapes after aligning? The output rectangle 3x3 includes both colors. Let's see if we can map input shapes onto that rectangle. Consider elder god = M (larger). Younger = Y (smaller). In output, M occupies many cells, Y occupies some cells where M not present, but within same rectangle. If we take the shape of M (a kind of L shape) and Y (a small L) and overlay them after translating so that they occupy same bounding box of size 3? Let's compute shape of M: coordinates relative to its own bounding box. M bounding box rows 2-4, cols 3-5 => size 3x3. Within that 3x3, M pattern: Rows relative 0-2, cols 0-2: Row0 (r2): M M M Row1 (r3): . M M Row2 (r4): . . M That's exactly the output's M pattern! Indeed output first column row0 M, row1 Y? Wait output row0: M M M matches row0 of M pattern. Row1: Y M M matches row1 pattern where M at col1,2 and empty at col0 replaced by Y. Row2: Y Y M matches row2 pattern where M at col2 and empties at col0,1 replaced by Y. So output is the 3x3 bounding box of the larger shape (M), with the s ... [6185 chars truncated]
"Two dancers in different costumes share a tiny floor — the lead sweeps across most of the space, but the partner pirouettes into every gap the lead leaves, until not a single tile is untouched."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two dancers in contrasting colors are positioned far apart on a dark ballroom floor. One dancer covers more ground; the other is more compact, their movements complementing the spaces the first avoids.
Do: Both dancers converge onto a small dance floor. The lead claims their positions, and the partner fills every remaining tile with their own steps, until the entire floor bears the mark of one dancer or the other.
Grid: A compact dance floor — every tile touched by one dancer's color or the other, no unmarked space.
"Two mineral veins of different ores intrude into the same rock face. The dominant vein fills most of the fractures, but the secondary vein crystallizes in every remaining crack — the outcrop is solid color through and through."
120b: k=1
See: Two mineral deposits of different colors are exposed across a dark rock face. One deposit is more extensive; the other is smaller, its crystals growing precisely in the voids the larger deposit leaves.
Do: Both veins consolidate into a single compact outcrop. The dominant mineral fills its natural fractures, and the secondary mineral crystallizes in every remaining gap, producing a solid face with no empty rock.
Grid: A small, solid outcrop cross-section — every cell filled with one mineral color or the other, no bare matrix rock.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with many '.' (black) and some colored cells: Y (yellow) and M (magenta). Output is a 3x3 grid with M and Y only. So transformation extracts region where two minerals interact? Let's map. Input example1 coordinates: Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Rows with Y: row0 col8 Y. row1 col8 Y, col9 Y. So Y forms a small shape: two cells vertical? Actually positions: (0,8), (1,8), (1,9). That's like an L shape. M positions: row2 col3-5 (three M). row3 col4-5 (two M). row4 col5 (one M). So shape like a triangle. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M That looks like overlay of shapes? Let's see if output corresponds to bounding box of combined region? The combined region of M and Y in input occupies rows 0-4, cols 3-9? Actually M from col3-5, Y at col8-9. There's gap columns 6-7 empty. Output seems to compress them together: "dominant mineral fills its natural fractures, secondary fills gaps". So maybe rule: take the larger shape (dominant) and fill its interior gaps with the smaller shape's color, after moving them together so they interlock without empty cells. In example, larger deposit is M (more cells). Smaller is Y (3 cells). The output is a 3x3 solid block where M occupies most cells, Y fills gaps. The pattern matches shape of M after being compacted? Let's examine M shape: original M cells coordinates relative: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5); (3,4)(3,5); (4,5). That's like a right triangle shape (like a 3x3 lower-left triangle?). If we shift them leftwards to fill gaps, we could get a 3x3 triangle of M occupying positions: maybe top row three M, middle row two M, bottom row one M. That's exactly the M pattern in output (top row MMM, middle row ? actually output middle row Y M M: two M at right side, Y at left). Wait output M pattern: row0 MMM (3), row1 positions col1? Actually output grid columns 0-2. Row1: Y M M (so M at col1,2). Row2: Y Y M (M at col2). So M forms a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Let's map M positions: (0,0)(0,1)(0,2); (1,1)(1,2); (2,2). That's a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right, filling upper triangle. That's same shape as original M but rotated? Original M shape: coordinates relative to its bounding box (rows 0-2, cols 0-2) maybe? Let's compute original M bounding box rows 2-4, cols 3-5. Translate to (0,0) origin: cells: (0,0)(0,1)(0,2); (1,1)(1,2); (2,2). That's exactly same pattern! So original M already is that triangle shape. So output M pattern matches original M shape unchanged (just cropped to bounding box). Y cells in output fill the empty cells within the bounding box of M? The bounding box of M is 3x3. Within that box, the cells not occupied by M are: (1,0), (2,0), (2,1). Those three cells are filled with Y in output. Indeed output Y at (1,0) and (2,0)(2,1). So rule: take the larger shape (dominant) and its minimal bounding rectangle. Then fill any empty cells inside that rectangle with the smaller shape's color, preserving relative positions? Bu ... [2345 chars truncated]
"A baker presses dough into a mold, but the dough doesn't fill every cavity. A second batter, poured over the top, seeps into the hollows the first dough couldn't reach."
120b: k=2
See: Two ingredients of different colors sit apart on a large dark countertop. One ingredient spreads more generously; the other is a smaller portion that seems shaped to complement the first.
Do: Place both ingredients into the same small baking tin. The larger portion settles where it naturally fits, and the smaller portion flows into every gap the first one left behind, until the tin is completely full.
Grid: A filled baking tin — no empty space, just two colors of batter sharing every cell of the mold.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input larger shape of one color (M in ex1) and smaller shape of another (Y). Output is a 3x3 grid combining them? Let's examine. Example1 input grid 10x10. There is a cluster of M (magenta) shape: looks like a plus? Let's map coordinates. Rows 0-9. M positions: row2 col3-5 (three), row3 col4-5 (two), row4 col5 (one). That's like a triangle shape? Actually shape: coordinates (2,3)(2,4)(2,5); (3,4)(3,5); (4,5). That's a right triangle oriented down-right. Y positions: row0 col8, row1 col8-9. That's a vertical 2 cells plus one above? Actually Y at (0,8) and (1,8)(1,9). That's an L shape. Output is 3x3: M M M Y M M Y Y M So output grid seems to be the minimal bounding box that contains both shapes after "filling gaps". The larger shape (M) placed, then smaller shape (Y) fills gaps left by M to make full rectangle? Let's see: The output 3x3 fully filled with M and Y, no empty cells. The pattern: M occupies most cells except lower left triangle? Actually output matrix: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M That's like M shape same as original M shape (right triangle) placed in top-left? Let's compare original M shape orientation: original M shape coordinates relative to its bounding box: rows 0-2, cols 0-2? Let's extract: original M shape bounding box rows2-4, cols3-5. Within that 3x3 box, M pattern is: Row0 (r2): M M M Row1 (r3): . M M (since col3 empty, col4 M, col5 M) Row2 (r4): . . M (col5 M) That matches a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Actually pattern: top row full, second row last two, third row last one. That's exactly the pattern in output but output has Y filling the empty spots: positions where M missing become Y. Indeed output shows Y at (1,0) and (2,0)(2,1) which correspond to the empty spots of M shape within the 3x3 bounding box. So rule: Take the larger shape (dominant color) and its minimal bounding rectangle. Fill any empty cells within that rectangle with the smaller shape's color, preserving relative positions? The smaller shape appears to be placed to fill the gaps, but its original arrangement maybe not used; just its color fills all empty cells. Check Example2: Input has G shape (larger?) and O shape (smaller). Let's see counts. G positions: row2 col1-2 (two), row3 col1 (one), row4 col1 (one). That's 4 cells. O positions: row7 col8, row8 col8-9, row9 col8-9 (4 cells). Both have 4 cells. Which is larger? maybe shape area? But rule says larger portion settles where it naturally fits (its original shape). Smaller flows into gaps. In output 3x3: G G O G O O G O O Let's see bounding box of G shape: rows2-4, cols1-2 => size 3 rows x2 cols? Actually cols1-2 inclusive width 2. That's 3x2 rectangle. But output is 3x3. Hmm maybe they take union bounding box of both shapes? Let's compute bounding box covering both shapes: G at rows2-4, cols1-2. O at rows7-9, cols8-9. Combined bounding box rows2-9 (8 rows) cols1-9 (9 cols). Not 3x3. But output is 3x3, similar to example1. Perhaps ... [4149 chars truncated]
"Two musicians play the same measure but never at the same beat — where one rests, the other sounds, and together they produce a chord with no silence."
120b: k=1
See: Two melodies in different timbres are scattered across a silent score. One melody has more notes; the other is sparser, its notes falling precisely in the rests of the first.
Do: Collapse both parts onto a single small staff. The louder instrument claims its beats, and the quieter one fills every remaining rest, producing a measure where every beat rings.
Grid: A dense, compact measure — every beat occupied by one timbre or the other, with no rests remaining.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 10x10 grid with some colored cells. Output is 3x3 grid. So transformation extracts overlapping patterns? Let's examine example. Input grid (I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9). Represent non-blank cells: Row0: col8 Y Row1: col8 Y, col9 Y Row2: col3 M, col4 M, col5 M Row3: col4 M, col5 M Row4: col5 M Rows5-9 empty. So shape: a cluster of M forming a kind of triangle? Let's map coordinates: M at (2,3),(2,4),(2,5) M at (3,4),(3,5) M at (4,5) Y at (0,8),(1,8),(1,9) Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M So output seems to be a compacted version where the two "melodies" (M cluster and Y cluster) are overlapped onto a small grid, with M taking precedence (louder) where overlapping? Let's see mapping: The M cluster shape is like a diagonal line descending right? Actually coordinates relative: shape of M forms a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Let's draw 3x3 output: M M M top row all M. second row Y M M. third row Y Y M. This is also a right triangle of M on right side, Y on left side. In input, M cluster occupies a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Let's view relative positions: M positions form a diagonal line from (2,3) to (4,5) with extra cells making a triangle shape oriented down-right. Y positions are separate cluster at top right area (0,8),(1,8),(1,9) forming a small L shape. The output seems to combine them into a 3x3 where M occupies right side triangle, Y occupies left side triangle. So maybe rule: take bounding boxes of each color, then overlay them aligning their "beats" (maybe aligning along a diagonal?). The description: "Two melodies in different timbres are scattered across a silent score. One melody has more notes; the other is sparser, its notes falling precisely in the rests of the first. Collapse both parts onto a single small staff. The louder instrument claims its beats, and the quieter one fills every remaining rest, producing a measure where every beat rings." Interpretation: There are two colors: one more dense (M) and one sparser (Y). They are placed such that the sparser notes fall in the empty spaces of the denser when projected onto a smaller grid (maybe by compressing rows and columns that have any notes). The rule: compress the grid by removing empty rows and columns, preserving relative order, resulting in a compact grid where cells are filled by the denser color if both would occupy same cell, else the sparser fills empty. Thus we need to take input grid, remove all rows that are completely empty (all .) and all columns that are completely empty, then we get a smaller grid. In example, which rows have any non-blank? rows 0,1,2,3,4 have notes. rows 5-9 empty, removed. So we keep rows 0-4 => 5 rows. Columns with any notes: columns 3,4,5,8,9. That's 5 columns. So after removing empty rows/cols, we would get a 5x5 grid. But output is 3x3, not 5x5. So maybe also compress each color separately then overlay? Let's examine: The M cluster occupies co ... [7632 chars truncated]
"Two teams in different jerseys scramble to cover the same small field. The stronger team claims most positions, but the underdog fills the gaps in the formation — every square of turf is defended."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two squads in distinct colors are warming up far apart on a vast dark pitch. One squad is larger; the other smaller, their stances oddly complementary.
Do: Both teams converge onto a compact playing area. The larger squad takes its positions first, and the smaller squad slots into every uncovered position, until no patch of field is unoccupied.
Grid: A tight formation grid where every position is filled by one jersey color or the other — no open ground.
"A cloud formation and a patch of clear sky share the same window of atmosphere. Where clouds gather, sky hides; where sky opens, clouds retreat — together they paint the whole frame."
120b: k=1
See: Two weather patterns in different hues drift across a dark atmospheric void. One system covers more area; the other is smaller and seems to nestle into the exact spaces the larger one avoids.
Do: Compress both weather systems into one small observation window. The dominant system fills its natural region, and the minor system occupies every remaining pocket, leaving no void in the frame.
Grid: A compact weather map where every cell shows one system or the other — no dark emptiness, just two interlocking patterns.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with many '.' (black) and some colors. Output is 3x3 grid with colors M and Y. Let's examine example 1. Input coordinates: Let's map positions with non '.'. Rows index 0-9, columns 0-9. Row0: col8 Y Row1: col8 Y, col9 Y Row2: col3 M, col4 M, col5 M Row3: col4 M, col5 M Row4: col5 M Other rows empty. So pattern: a small cluster of M shaped like maybe a triangle? And Y vertical line at column8 rows0-1. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M Interpretation: The output seems to be a minimal bounding rectangle that contains both patterns, but compressed? Let's see bounding box of all non '.' cells: min row =0, max row=4, min col=3, max col=8. That's height 5 rows, width 6 cols. Output is 3x3, so they compressed. Maybe they take the larger pattern (M) and fill its shape, and fill remaining spaces with Y (the other pattern). The description: "dominant system fills its natural region, and the minor system occupies every remaining pocket, leaving no void". So we need to identify which color occupies larger area (more cells). In example, M count =? M cells: row2 three, row3 two, row4 one =6. Y cells: row0 one, row1 two =3. So M is dominant. Output shows M in many cells, Y in remaining cells, forming a shape where M occupies its natural region (maybe shape of M cluster) and Y fills rest of rectangle. But output 3x3: Let's see shape of M in output: positions (0,0)(0,1)(0,2)(1,1)(1,2)(2,2) = 6 cells, matches M count. Y positions: (1,0)(2,0)(2,1) =3 cells matches Y count. So they preserved counts and relative arrangement? The arrangement seems to be that they compress the pattern into a minimal rectangle preserving relative ordering? Let's map original M shape coordinates relative to its bounding box: M cells coordinates (row, col): (2,3),(2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,5) If we shift to top-left of its own bounding box (min row2, min col3) => subtract (2,3): (0,0),(0,1),(0,2) (1,1),(1,2) (2,2) That matches exactly M positions in output! Good. So they take the dominant color's shape, extract its minimal bounding box, and place it at top-left of output grid. Now Y cells original coordinates: (0,8),(1,8),(1,9). Their bounding box min row0, min col8. Relative positions: (0,0),(1,0),(1,1). In output Y positions are (1,0),(2,0),(2,1). That's shifted down by 1 row compared to M shape? Actually output overall grid size is determined by the larger shape's bounding box (dominant). The dominant shape occupies its bounding box (size 3x3). The other shape is placed in remaining cells of that same rectangle, preserving its relative arrangement but maybe rotated? Let's see: In output, Y occupies lower-left corner 2x2 minus top-left cell. Relative positions within the 3x3 rectangle: Y cells at (1,0),(2,0),(2,1). If we take the dominant shape's bounding box (3x3). The Y shape's relative positions originally (0,0),(1,0),(1,1). To fit into same 3x3 rectangle without overlapping M, they may be placed in the " ... [5568 chars truncated]
"A mason lays stones of one color but leaves deliberate voids in the wall. A second artisan fills those voids with stones of a different hue — the finished wall has no mortar gaps."
120b: k=1
See: Two sets of building materials in different colors are scattered across a dark construction site. One set is more abundant; the other is smaller and seems cut to fit the spaces the first set would leave.
Do: Assemble both sets into one compact wall section. The primary stones are placed first, then the secondary stones are fitted precisely into every remaining gap, producing a seamless surface.
Grid: A small, solid wall face — every position filled with one stone color or the other, no gaps or mortar showing.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with many '.' (black) and some colored cells Y and M. Output is a small 3x3 grid with only M and Y. The description: two sets of building materials, primary stones placed first, then secondary stones fitted into gaps. So likely we need to extract the minimal bounding rectangle that contains all non-black cells? In example, input has Y's forming a shape maybe vertical line? Let's map coordinates. Example1 input grid (10x10). Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . Y . 1: . . . . . . . . Y Y 2: . . . M M M . . . . 3: . . . . M M . . . . 4: . . . . . M . . . . 5-9 all dots. So Y's at (0,8), (1,8),(1,9). M's at (2,3),(2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5),(4,5). That's shape. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M So output seems to be a compact arrangement where primary stones (maybe M) placed first, then secondary (Y) fill gaps. The output contains exactly the same counts? Count M in input: 6. Output M count: row0 3 + row1 2 + row2 1 =6. Y count input: 3. Output Y count: row1 1 + row2 2 =3. So same counts. So rule: take all colored cells, pack them into a compact rectangle (no empty cells) preserving relative order? Perhaps fill row-major order with primary color first then secondary? But output arrangement shows M's occupy top-left region, Y's fill remaining cells in bottom-left? Let's see arrangement: 3x3 rectangle fully filled. The pattern: M's fill a triangle shape? Actually layout: Positions (r,c): (0,0) M (0,1) M (0,2) M (1,0) Y (1,1) M (1,2) M (2,0) Y (2,1) Y (2,2) M So M's occupy all cells except three Y's placed in lower-left corner shape (like a L). The Y's are placed in positions that correspond to original relative arrangement? In original, Y's formed a small L shape: coordinates (0,8),(1,8),(1,9). That's like a 2x2 block missing (0,9). That's similar shape to Y's in output: positions (1,0),(2,0),(2,1) which is also an L shape missing (1,1). So shape preserved but rotated? Actually original Y shape: top-left of that shape at (0,8). In output Y shape top-left at (1,0). So shape preserved orientation? Original Y's: positions relative: (0,0), (1,0), (1,1). Output Y's: (1,0), (2,0), (2,1). That's same shape shifted down one row. So they kept relative arrangement but maybe placed them after packing M's? Let's examine M shape original: M's coordinates: (2,3),(2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5),(4,5). That's like a diagonal shape? Visual: row2 three consecutive, row3 two, row4 one. That's like a triangle shape (right-justified). Output M's shape: positions: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(1,2),(2,2). That's also a triangle shape but mirrored? Original M shape: top row length 3, then 2, then 1, aligned left? Actually original coordinates: row2 columns 3-5 (three). row3 columns 4-5 (two) shifted right by 1. row4 column5 (one) shifted right by 2. So shape is right-justified triangle sloping down-right. Output M shape: row0 columns 0-2 (three) leftmost, row1 columns1-2 (two) shifted right by1, ro ... [7034 chars truncated]
"Two armies claim the same contested ground. The larger force digs in first, but the smaller force infiltrates every undefended position — the battlefield is fully occupied with no neutral territory."
120b: k=1
See: Two forces in different colors are positioned far apart across a dark no-man's-land. One force is stronger; the other is a smaller unit whose formation is the exact inverse of the larger force's footprint.
Do: Both forces converge on a small contested zone. The larger force holds its ground, and the smaller force occupies every cell the larger one left exposed, until the entire zone is claimed.
Grid: A compact tactical map — every cell held by one color or the other, no unclaimed territory.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with some colored cells. Output is a small 3x3 grid? In example, output is 3x3 containing M and Y. Input had M region and Y region. Let's map. Input example1: Let's write coordinates. Grid 10x10. Y cells at (0,8), (1,8),(1,9). M cells forming shape: rows2-4? Actually row2 (index2) has M M M at columns3-5. Row3 has M M at columns4-5. Row4 has M at column5. So M shape is like a triangle pointing down? Y shape is vertical line of two then one? Actually Y cells: (0,8) top, (1,8) below, (1,9) right of that. So shape like an L? The description: two forces far apart across dark no-man's-land. Larger force holds ground, smaller occupies every cell the larger left exposed until entire zone claimed. So maybe we take bounding boxes of each color, find overlapping region? The output is the overlapping region after "convergence". In example, larger force maybe M (more cells) and smaller Y (fewer). Their footprints: M shape 3x3? Let's compute minimal bounding rectangle of M: rows2-4, cols3-5 => size 3 rows x3 cols. Y bounding rectangle rows0-1, cols8-9 => 2 rows x2 cols. Not same size. But description says smaller unit's formation is exact inverse of larger force's footprint. Inverse maybe rotated 180? Let's see shape of Y relative to M? M shape pattern: Row0 of its bbox (row2): M M M Row1 (row3): . M M Row2 (row4): . . M That's like a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Actually pattern: [1,1,1] [0,1,1] [0,0,1] That's a triangle of ones in upper-left to lower-right diagonal. Y shape pattern within its bbox (2x2): Rows0-1, cols8-9: Row0: . Y (since only at col8? Actually (0,8) Y, (0,9) .) Row1: Y Y (col8 Y, col9 Y) Pattern: [0,1] [1,1] That's also a triangle but inverse (mirrored) maybe? If we rotate M 90? Not exactly. But output 3x3: M M M Y M M Y Y M That pattern matches merging of M and Y where Y occupies cells where M had . (empty) within the 3x3 bounding box of M? Let's overlay: M bbox 3x3. Fill with M where original M present, else fill with Y where Y shape would map? The output shows first row all M (original M row had M M M). Second row: original M row had . M M, output has Y M M (so the missing cell replaced by Y). Third row: original M row had . . M, output has Y Y M (both missing cells replaced by Y). So indeed Y pattern fills the empty cells of M's shape, but Y pattern is placed such that its shape aligns with the missing cells? The Y shape is a triangle of size 2, but placed anchored at bottom-left of M bbox? Let's see Y pattern of size 2 placed such that its occupied cells correspond to the empty cells of M. In M bbox, empty cells are at positions (row1,col0) and (row2,col0),(row2,col1). That's a shape of a triangle of size 2 (2 rows). Y shape originally is a triangle of size 2 with pattern: [0,1] [1,1] If we align its top-left to (row1,col0) of M bbox, then its cells would be: (row1,col0) empty -> Y? Actually Y pattern at (0,1) would map to (row1,col1) which is already M. ... [5039 chars truncated]
"Two actors share a tiny stage — the lead commands most of the spotlight, but the understudy steps into every shadow the lead casts, until the whole stage glows."
120b: fail
See: Two performers in different costumes stand far apart on a vast dark stage. One commands more presence; the other is subtler, positioned as if to fill the negative space of the first.
Do: Both performers converge onto a small spotlight. The lead takes their marks, and the understudy occupies every remaining dark spot, until every square of stage is illuminated by one performer or the other.
Grid: A tight stage grid — every cell lit by one costume color or the other, no darkness remaining.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 10x10 with many '.' and some colors Y and M. Output is 3x3 grid with M and Y. So rule extracts region containing colored cells? Let's map. Input example1 grid coordinates (row0-9, col0-9). Let's list positions of non-'.' cells. Row0: col8 Y Row1: col8 Y, col9 Y Row2: col3 M, col4 M, col5 M Row3: col4 M, col5 M Row4: col5 M Other rows empty. So shape: a cluster of M forming a kind of triangle, and Y vertical line at col8 rows0-1. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M Interpretation: maybe we take bounding box of all colored cells, then fill with two colors: the "lead" performer is the larger cluster (M) and fills its shape, while the understudy fills remaining cells within bounding box with other color(s) maybe Y? Let's compute bounding box of all non-'.' cells: min row =0, max row=4; min col=3, max col=9? Actually Y at col8-9, M at col3-5. So min col=3, max col=9. That gives width 7 columns (3-9 inclusive) and height 5 rows (0-4). But output is 3x3, not 5x7. Maybe they compress by removing empty rows/cols within each color? Or they overlay shapes? Let's think: The output seems to be a 3x3 representation where M occupies a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Actually output matrix: M M M Y M M Y Y M That's like a lower-left triangle of Y, rest M. That matches pattern of original: M cluster is larger (more cells) and Y cluster is smaller (2 cells). In original, M shape is like a triangle pointing down-right? Let's visualize original M positions: rows2-4 columns3-5 forming a triangle: row2 col3-5 (3 cells), row3 col4-5 (2 cells), row4 col5 (1 cell). That's a right triangle with right angle at top-left? Actually coordinates: (2,3)(2,4)(2,5); (3,4)(3,5); (4,5). That's a triangle sloping down-right. Y positions: (0,8) and (1,8)(1,9) forming a small L shape? Actually Y at (0,8) and (1,8)(1,9) forms a shape like a corner. If we translate both shapes to a common origin and overlay? The output shows M triangle of size 3 (3 rows) and Y shape filling lower-left triangle? Let's map M triangle of size 3 (rows0-2, cols0-2) with pattern: row0: M M M row1: . M M row2: . . M But output row1 col0 is Y not '.'; row2 col0 Y, col1 Y. So Y occupies the lower-left triangle (including diagonal?) Actually output Y positions: (1,0), (2,0), (2,1). That's a triangle of size 2? That's similar to Y shape original? Original Y shape: (0,8) single, (1,8)(1,9) two cells. That's like a shape of size 2 rows: top row one cell, second row two cells to the right. If we rotate? The output Y triangle is bottom-left, not top-right. Maybe rule: take two distinct colors (excluding '.'), identify the one with more cells (lead) and the one with fewer cells (understudy). Then create a minimal bounding box that tightly contains both shapes after aligning their centroids? Or maybe we overlay them such that the lead shape occupies its own shape, and the understudy fills the remaining cells of the bounding box (i.e., the convex hull) ... [4170 chars truncated]
"Two species of flower are planted in the same bed — one spreads broadly, the other tucks itself into every bare patch the first one missed, until the bed is a seamless carpet of blooms."
120b: k=1
See: Two types of flowers in different colors are planted far apart in a dark garden plot. One species covers more ground; the other is sparser, its blooms shaped to fit the bare spots of the first.
Do: Transplant both species into one compact flower bed. The dominant species fills its natural positions, and the companion species roots in every remaining gap, leaving no bare soil.
Grid: A small, lush bed — every cell blooming in one color or the other, with no bare earth visible.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with some colored cells: Y, M. Output is a 3x3 grid with M and Y. Let's examine positions. Input example1: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows with data: Row0: col8 Y Row1: col8 Y, col9 Y Row2: col3 M, col4 M, col5 M Row3: col4 M, col5 M Row4: col5 M Other rows empty. So shape: M cluster roughly a triangle? Y cluster vertical line at col8 rows0-1. Output 3x3: Row0: M M M Row1: Y M M Row2: Y Y M Interpretation: The dominant species (more cells) is M (magenta). The other is Y (yellow). The output is a compact arrangement where M occupies its natural positions (relative arrangement) and Y fills remaining gaps. So we need to take the pattern of M cells relative positions, compress to minimal bounding box, then fill empty cells within that box with Y cells (the other color). The output size equals bounding box of dominant species? Let's test: M cells coordinates: (2,3),(2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5),(4,5). Bounding box rows 2-4 (height 3), cols 3-5 (width 3). That's 3x3. Within that box, we have M at positions: (0,0?) Let's translate: subtract min row 2, min col 3. So relative positions: (0,0) (0,1) (0,2) (1,1) (1,2) (2,2) That matches output M positions: row0 col0-2 all M, row1 col1-2 M, row2 col2 M. Yes. Now Y cells original positions: (0,8),(1,8),(1,9). Need to map them into same bounding box? The rule says companion species roots in every remaining gap, leaving no bare soil. So we need to place Y cells into the empty cells of the bounding box (where M not present). The pattern of Y maybe preserves relative arrangement? Let's see output Y positions: (1,0), (2,0),(2,1). That's a shape of Y cluster: original Y shape is like an L? Original Y positions relative to each other: (0,8) and (1,8) vertical line, plus (1,9) to the right of lower one. That's a shape: two vertical, then a right cell at bottom. In output Y positions: (1,0) and (2,0) vertical line, plus (2,1) right of bottom. Same shape! So Y pattern is placed into the empty cells of the bounding box, preserving its shape orientation, maybe anchored at top-leftmost empty cell? Let's see mapping: The empty cells in bounding box are positions not occupied by M: coordinates relative: (1,0), (2,0), (2,1). That's exactly where Y placed. So Y pattern is placed to fill those empty cells, but also matches shape of Y cluster. It seems they just fill all empty cells with Y, regardless of original shape. Since empty cells count = 3, and Y count = 3, they fill them. The shape matches because the empty cells happen to have that shape. Thus rule: Identify the color that appears most (dominant). Compute its minimal bounding rectangle. Output grid is that rectangle. Within it, keep dominant color cells at same relative positions. All other cells within rectangle become the other color(s) that were present? In example only one other color Y. If multiple other colors maybe they fill? But description says two types of flowers. So exactly two colors. ... [2445 chars truncated]
See: The input is a tall grid consisting of three equally-sized square layers stacked vertically. Each layer is 5 rows by 5 columns. The top layer contains cells that are either blue (B) or black (.). The middle layer contains cells that are either azure (A) or black (.). The bottom layer contains cells that are either magenta (M) or black (.). Each layer acts as a binary mask for its respective color, where the colored cells are 'present' and black cells are 'absent.'
Do: Divide the input into three equal layers from top to bottom: the B-layer (blue), the A-layer (azure), and the M-layer (magenta). Each layer has the same dimensions. Create an output grid of the same dimensions as one layer. For each cell position, apply a priority rule to determine the output color: if the M-layer has a colored cell at that position, the output is M (magenta); otherwise, if the B-layer has a colored cell at that position, the output is B (blue); otherwise, if the A-layer has a colored cell at that position, the output is A (azure); otherwise, the output is black (.). In short, the priority order is M > B > A > black.
Grid: The input grid is 15 rows by 5 columns, composed of three stacked 5×5 layers. The output grid is 5 rows by 5 columns. The background color is black (.). The three colors used are blue (B), azure (A), and magenta (M), each exclusive to its respective layer in the input but potentially co-occurring at the same position in the output resolution.
"Three painters compete for a single canvas, and the last to arrive paints over everyone else."
120b: k=1
See: Three artists share a studio, each assigned a floor in a tall building. The blue painter works on the top floor, the azure painter on the middle floor, and the magenta painter in the basement. Each has sketched out where they want to place brushstrokes on an identical canvas — some cells filled, some left bare.
Do: The three painters must merge their plans onto a single shared canvas. The magenta painter, working deepest underground, has the strongest pigment — wherever she has marked a stroke, her color dominates and nobody can paint over it. The blue painter has the next strongest hand; his marks show through wherever magenta hasn't already claimed the spot. The azure painter is the gentlest — her color only appears in the gaps the other two left untouched. Where no artist wanted to paint at all, the canvas stays bare and dark.
Grid: The tall building has three identical floors stacked vertically, each the size of the final canvas. Each floor's sketch uses only one color against darkness. The shared canvas is a single floor's worth of space, where the strongest pigments rise from below to claim their territory.
We need to infer rule. The description: three floors (blue top, azure middle, magenta bottom). Input grid seems to be 15 rows? Actually example input is 15 rows, each row length 5? Let's examine example 1 input: lines: ". B B B B" ". B B . ." ". B B B ." ". . B B B" ". B B B ." ". A A . ." "A . . A ." ". A . . A" ". . A . ." "A . A . A" ". M . M M" ". . M M M" ". M . . ." ". M M . M" ". . . . ." That's 15 rows, 5 columns. So three floors each of 5x5? Actually 15 rows = 3*5 rows. So each floor is 5 rows stacked vertically: top floor rows 0-4 (blue), middle rows 5-9 (azure), bottom rows 10-14 (magenta). Output is 5x5 grid (single floor). The rule: combine layers with priority: magenta > blue > azure? Wait description: magenta strongest (bottom), blue next, azure gentle (top). So output cell color determined by: if magenta layer has a colored cell (non-.) then output that color (M). Else if blue layer has colored cell then output that color (B). Else if azure layer has colored cell then output that color (A). Else '.' (black). However example output includes also A and B and M. Let's test with example 1. Let's compute manually for a few cells. We need to map coordinates: rows 0-4 blue, 5-9 azure, 10-14 magenta. Take column 0 (first column). Input rows: 0: '.' (blue) 1: '.' (blue) 2: '.' (blue) 3: '.' (blue) 4: '.' (blue) 5: '.' (azure) 6: 'A' (azure) 7: '.' (azure) 8: '.' (azure) 9: 'A' (azure) 10: '.' (magenta) 11: '.' (magenta) 12: '.' (magenta) 13: '.' (magenta) 14: '.' (magenta) Now output row0 col0? Output grid first row: ". M B M M". Wait that's row0 of output. Column0 char '.' . According to rule, magenta at row0? Need to map which row of output corresponds to which column? Actually output is 5x5, each cell corresponds to column across floors? The stacking: each floor is same size; we need to combine per cell across floors (same column and row index within floor). So output row i corresponds to row i within each floor (i from 0 to 4). So for output row0 col0, we look at blue row0 col0, azure row5 col0, magenta row10 col0. Those are '.' '.' '.' => output '.' matches. Now output row0 col1 is 'M'. Let's check column1 row0: blue row0 col1 = 'B' (since row0 ". B B B B": col1 B). azure row5 col1 = '.' (row5 ". A A . .": col1 A? Wait row5 is ". A A . .": columns: 0 '.',1 'A',2 'A',3 '.',4 '.' . So col1 = 'A'. magenta row10 col1 = 'M' (row10 ". M . M M": col1 = 'M'). Since magenta present, output 'M' matches. Row0 col2 output 'B'. Check: blue row0 col2 = 'B', azure row5 col2 = 'A', magenta row10 col2 = '.' . Magenta none, blue present, output should be blue 'B' (since blue stronger than azure). Indeed output 'B'. Row0 col3 output 'M'. Blue row0 col3 = 'B', azure row5 col3 = '.', magenta row10 col3 = 'M' => M. Row0 col4 output 'M'. Blue row0 col4 = 'B', azure row5 col4='.', magenta row10 col4='M' => M. Matches rule. Check another cell: output row1 col0 = 'A' (from output). Row1 corresponds to row index 1 within floor. Blue ... [4457 chars truncated]
"Three species of lichen colonize the same rock face. The magenta fungus is most aggressive and claims any territory it touches. The blue algae holds firm where the fungus hasn't spread. The azure cyanobacteria only survives in the gaps left by both."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall slab of rock divided into three horizontal bands, each colonized by a different organism — one blue, one azure, one magenta — scattered across the stone in irregular patches against bare black rock.
Do: Let the three colonies compete for the same territory. The magenta fungus overgrows everything beneath it; the blue algae holds where fungus is absent; the azure cyanobacteria clings only to what neither has claimed. Bare rock remains where none has reached.
Grid: The rock face is 15 rows by 5 columns, three bands of 5 rows each. The surviving colony map is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three nebulae drift through the same region of space. The magenta emission nebula burns hottest and outshines anything at its coordinates. The blue reflection nebula glows where no emission nebula blazes. The azure planetary nebula is visible only in the voids left by both."
120b: k=2
See: A tall star chart split into three equal panels, each mapping scattered patches of a different nebula type against the black void of space.
Do: Merge the three panels into a single deep-field image. The emission nebula's glow dominates; the reflection nebula shows where emission is absent; the planetary nebula appears only where neither other type exists. Black void remains elsewhere.
Grid: The star chart is 15 rows by 5 columns in three 5-row panels. The composite image is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 15 rows x5 columns, representing three panels of 5 rows each stacked vertically. Output is 5x5 composite. Interpretation: three panels correspond to three nebula types: emission (maybe B?), reflection (A?), planetary (M?). In description: emission nebula's glow dominates; reflection nebula shows where emission is absent; planetary nebula appears only where neither other type exists. Black void remains elsewhere. Thus we have three layers: top panel = emission? middle = reflection? bottom = planetary? Need to map colors: In examples, colors present: B, A, M. Output contains B, A, M, plus maybe . (black). In Example1, input top 5 rows contain B and . only. middle rows contain A and . only. bottom rows contain M and . only. Output includes mixture of B, A, M, and . . So rule: For each cell (column, row) in 5x5 output, look at the three corresponding cells from each panel (same column, row within each panel). Determine final color: If emission (B) present (i.e., B in top panel cell), that dominates (output B). Else if reflection (A) present (i.e., A in middle panel cell) and no B, output A. Else if planetary (M) present (i.e., M in bottom panel cell) and no B or A, output M. Else output . (black). However need to consider cases where multiple colors present? In examples, there may be overlapping? Let's test with Example1. Let's reconstruct Example1 input panels. Rows 1-5 (top): 1 . B B B B 2 . B B . . 3 . B B B . 4 . . B B B 5 . B B B . Rows6-10 (middle): 6 . A A . . 7 A . . A . 8 . A . . A 9 . . A . . 10 A . A . A Rows11-15 (bottom): 11 . M . M M 12 . . M M M 13 . M . . . 14 . M M . M 15 . . . . . Now compute output per rule. Let's compute each column 1-5. I'll create table of top, middle, bottom per row. Row1 col1 top '.'; middle row6 col1 '.'; bottom row11 col1 '.' => none => output '.'? In output row1 col1 is '.' indeed. Row1 col2: top B, middle row6 col2 A? row6 col2 = A? Wait row6 is ". A A . ." so col2 = A. bottom row11 col2 = M? row11 ". M . M M" col2 = M. According to rule, B dominates, output B. Output row1 col2 is M? Wait output row1: ". M B M M". Actually row1 col2 is M. Hmm not B. So my assumption wrong. Let's examine output row1: ". M B M M". So at position (row1,col2) output M, not B. That suggests priority order maybe M > B > A? Let's analyze. Check row1 col3: top B, middle row6 col3 = A, bottom row11 col3 = '.' . Output row1 col3 = B. So B appears when bottom is '.' and top B. Row1 col2 bottom is M, top B, middle A, output M. So bottom overrides top? Let's test other cells. Row1 col4: top B, middle row6 col4 = '.' , bottom row11 col4 = M. Output row1 col4 = M. So bottom overrides top. Row1 col5: top B, middle row6 col5 = '.' , bottom row11 col5 = M. Output M. Yes. Thus rule: planetary (M) overrides emission (B) and reflection (A). Emission overrides reflection? Let's test. Row2 output: "A B M M M". Row2 corresponds to input row2 (top) ". B B . .". middle row7 "A . . A .". bot ... [4057 chars truncated]
"Three currents flow through the same strait at different depths. The magenta deep current is strongest and defines the flow wherever it runs. The blue surface current governs where the deep current is absent. The azure tidal drift moves only through channels untouched by either stronger current."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall nautical chart divided into three equal depth layers — deep current in magenta, surface current in blue, tidal drift in azure — each marked as scattered flow lines against still black water.
Do: Read the combined current at each point in the strait. The deep current overrides all; the surface current holds where deep is absent; the tidal drift fills remaining gaps. Still water persists where no current flows.
Grid: The chart is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row depth layers. The combined current map is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three circuit layers are etched on the same chip. The magenta power traces have highest priority and claim any via they touch. The blue signal traces route through vias the power layer didn't use. The azure ground traces fill only the remaining connections."
120b: fail
See: A tall chip layout showing three equal layers of traces — power in magenta, signal in blue, ground in azure — each with scattered connections against an empty black substrate.
Do: Fabricate the chip by stacking the three layers. Power traces override signal traces at any shared via; signal traces override ground traces; ground traces exist only where neither other layer claims space. Empty substrate shows through the rest.
Grid: The chip layout is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row layers. The fabricated chip is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. From description: three layers of 5 rows each stacked. Input is 15 rows by 5 columns. Layers: rows 0-4 = power layer (magenta M), rows5-9 = signal layer (blue B), rows10-14 = ground layer (azure A). Actually description says power magenta, signal blue, ground azure. In examples, output shows combination where magenta overrides blue, blue overrides azure, azure only where none else. Also empty substrate '.' shows where no layer has any trace? But in input each layer uses its color letters: In example1 input, first 5 rows contain B and .? Actually example1 first 5 rows have B and . and also later rows have A and M. Let's map: rows0-4: contain B and . (blue). rows5-9: contain A and . (azure). rows10-14: contain M and . (magenta). Output is 5x5 grid with mixture of B, A, M, . according to priority: M > B > A > . (empty). Let's test with example1. We need to compute for each column row (0-4) combine layers: For each cell position (r,c) where r from 0-4 (output row), we look at layer rows: power row = r (0-4) from top? Actually power is magenta rows 10-14? Wait description: three equal layers of traces — power in magenta, signal in blue, ground in azure — each with scattered connections against an empty black substrate. Input grid is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row layers. So order maybe top to bottom: power (magenta) first 5 rows, then signal (blue) next 5, then ground (azure) last 5. But in example1, first 5 rows contain B (blue) not M. So maybe order is signal (blue) first, then ground (azure), then power (magenta). Indeed rows0-4 have B, rows5-9 have A, rows10-14 have M. That matches example1. So layer order: signal (blue) rows0-4, ground (azure) rows5-9, power (magenta) rows10-14. Now rule: For each cell, if any magenta present in power layer (rows10-14) at that column, output M. Else if any blue present in signal layer (rows0-4) at that column, output B. Else if any azure present in ground layer (rows5-9) at that column, output A. Else '.'. But need to consider that each layer is 5 rows, but we are stacking them: each output row corresponds to same row index across layers? Actually stacking layers means they overlay same coordinates, not combine rows. So output row i corresponds to row i of each layer (i from 0-4). So we look at three cells: (i, col) in each of the three layers (i in 0-4 for signal, i+5 for ground, i+10 for power). Choose based on priority. Let's test with example1 quickly for a cell. Take output row0 col0: output is '.' (from output). Input rows: row0 col0 '.' (signal), row5 col0 '.' (ground), row10 col0 '.' (power). So '.' correct. Row0 col1 output M. Input: row0 col1 B (signal), row5 col1 A (ground), row10 col1 M (power). Since power present, M overrides. Good. Row0 col2 output B. Input: row0 col2 B, row5 col2 A, row10 col2 '.'? Actually row10 col2 '.' (power). Since no M, B present, output B. Good. Row0 col3 output M. Input: row0 col3 B, row5 col3 '.'? row5 col3 '.' (gr ... [4070 chars truncated]
"Three divine edicts are inscribed over the same sacred tablet. The magenta decree of the underworld god cannot be overwritten. The blue commandment of the sky god stands where no underworld decree exists. The azure blessing of the sea god appears only in the unmarked spaces."
120b: k=3
See: A tall stone tablet divided into three equal bands, each bearing scattered glyphs in a different divine color against bare black stone.
Do: Read the tablet as one unified prophecy. The underworld god's words supersede all; the sky god's words fill the gaps; the sea god's words occupy what remains. Bare stone means silence from all three.
Grid: The tablet is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row divine bands. The unified prophecy is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 15x5 grid, three bands of 5 rows each. Output is 5x5 grid. The description: "tall stone tablet divided into three equal bands, each bearing scattered glyphs in a different divine color against bare black stone. What to do: Read the tablet as one unified prophecy. The underworld god's words supersede all; the sky god's words fill the gaps; the sea god's words occupy what remains. Bare stone means silence from all three." Interpretation: three bands correspond to three gods: maybe underworld = magenta (M), sky = azure (A), sea = blue (B)? Actually colors: Underworld maybe black? But we have colors: B=blue, A=azure, M=magenta. In examples, output contains combination of these colors. Let's analyze Example1. Input 15x5. Let's separate bands rows 0-4,5-9,10-14. I'll label rows. Example1 Input rows: 0: . B B B B 1: . B B . . 2: . B B B . 3: . . B B B 4: . B B B . 5: . A A . . 6: A . . A . 7: . A . . A 8: . . A . . 9: A . A . A 10: . M . M M 11: . . M M M 12: . M . . . 13: . M M . M 14: . . . . . Now output 5x5: 0: . M B M M 1: A B M M M 2: . M B B A 3: . M M B M 4: A B B B A We need to see how each cell of output derived from three corresponding cells from each band (same column, same row within band). For each position (i,j) where i from 0-4 (row within band), j 0-4 column. We have three values: top band (underworld?), middle band (sky?), bottom band (sea?). The rule: underworld supersedes all; sky fills gaps; sea occupies what remains. So priority order: underworld > sky > sea > black (silence). So output cell is the highest priority non-black among the three corresponding cells. Now need to map which band corresponds to which god. Underworld = maybe magenta (M) appears in bottom band of example1 (rows 10-14). Indeed bottom band contains M and . . . . . So underworld likely bottom band (sea? hmm). Sky maybe middle band (A). Sea maybe top band (B). Let's test. Take position (0,0): top band row0 col0 = '.' (black). middle band row5 col0 = '.' . bottom band row10 col0 = '.' . So all black => output '.'? Output at (0,0) is '.' yes. (0,1): top row0 col1 = B, middle row5 col1 = '.' , bottom row10 col1 = '.' . According to priority sea (top) maybe B, sky none, underworld none => output B? But output (0,1) is M. Wait output row0 col1 = M. So not B. So maybe underworld is top band? Let's test: top band has B, but output M, not B. So maybe underworld = middle band? middle row5 col1 = '.' not M. bottom row10 col1 = '.' not M. So where does M come from? Actually output M at (0,1) maybe from bottom band row10 col1? bottom row10 col1 is '.'? Wait row10: ". M . M M" columns: 0 '.' 1 'M' 2 '.' 3 'M' 4 'M'. So column1 is M. Yes bottom band row10 col1 = M. So output M came from bottom band. So underworld = bottom band (M). Good. Now (0,2): top row0 col2 = B, middle row5 col2 = A, bottom row10 col2 = '.' . Underworld (bottom) is '.' so not. Sky (middle) is A, sea (top) is B. Priority: underworld > sky > s ... [9692 chars truncated]
"Three dance troupes rehearse choreography for the same stage positions. When they perform together, the magenta troupe claims every mark they rehearsed — no one dares step there. The blue troupe takes their marks where magenta left space. The azure troupe fills in only the positions no one else claimed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall rehearsal chart with three equal sections showing each troupe's scattered stage marks in their signature color against empty black floor.
Do: Merge the three rehearsals into one performance. Magenta dancers hold their marks absolutely; blue dancers take unclaimed positions; azure dancers fill whatever gaps remain. Empty floor stays open.
Grid: The rehearsal chart is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row sections. The final blocking is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three mineral deposits form in the same rock stratum over successive ages. The magenta igneous intrusion, youngest and hardest, displaces everything at its location. The blue metamorphic layer persists where no intrusion cut through. The azure sedimentary deposit survives only where neither harder formation exists."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall cross-section of earth showing three equal strata — igneous in magenta, metamorphic in blue, sedimentary in azure — each with scattered mineral patches against barren black rock.
Do: Compress the three strata into a single geological survey. Igneous rock dominates wherever it intruded; metamorphic rock holds where igneous is absent; sedimentary rock remains only in the untouched gaps. Barren rock persists where no deposit formed.
Grid: The cross-section is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row strata. The geological survey is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three batters are poured into the same baking tin in succession. The magenta batter, poured last, sinks to the bottom and dominates wherever it lands. The blue batter settles where the magenta didn't reach. The azure batter floats to the top only where neither heavier batter pooled."
120b: k=2
See: A tall rectangular mold showing three separate layers of batter — blue on top, azure in the middle, magenta at the bottom — each dolloped in scattered portions against an empty black tin.
Do: Tip the three batters into a single pan. The densest (magenta) claims its spots first; the medium (blue) fills unclaimed spaces; the lightest (azure) drifts into whatever gaps remain. Empty tin shows through where no batter fell.
Grid: The mold is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row batter layers. The finished cake cross-section is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. From description: three layers of batter: top layer blue, middle azure, bottom magenta. Input grid is 15 rows x5 columns, representing three 5-row layers stacked vertically: rows 0-4 blue layer, rows5-9 azure layer, rows10-14 magenta layer. Output is 5x5 cross-section after "tipping" them into a single pan: densest (magenta) claims spots first; then medium (blue) fills unclaimed spaces; then lightest (azure) fills remaining gaps. Empty black shows where no batter. Interpretation: For each column, we have three layers each with scattered cells of that color (or empty). When "tipping", we combine them: think of gravity: we drop the pieces down into a 5x5 grid, with magenta pieces occupying cells first, then blue, then azure, but respecting that each cell can hold only one piece, priority order M > B > A. Also maybe pieces retain their column positions? Probably we overlay the three layers onto same 5x5 grid, with priority. Let's test with Example1. We need to extract layers. Input 15x5. Let's label rows 0-14. I'll write them. Example1 Input rows: 0: . B B B B 1: . B B . . 2: . B B B . 3: . . B B B 4: . B B B . 5: . A A . . 6: A . . A . 7: . A . . A 8: . . A . . 9: A . A . A 10: . M . M M 11: . . M M M 12: . M . . . 13: . M M . M 14: . . . . . Now layers: rows0-4 blue layer (B). rows5-9 azure (A). rows10-14 magenta (M). Goal output 5x5: Row0: . M B M M Row1: A B M M M Row2: . M B B A Row3: . M M B M Row4: A B B B A Let's compute overlay with priority M > B > A > . (empty). For each cell (col 0-4), we look at three rows (same column) across layers? But need to map each layer's 5x5 onto same positions. So for each column c, we have 5 rows in each layer. The output row index corresponds to row within layer? Probably we just overlay same coordinates: row i (0-4) corresponds to row i in each layer. So output cell (i,j) = priority of (layerM row i+10, col j), else (layerB row i, col j), else (layerA row i+5, col j). Let's test. Compute for each position. I'll create table. First, list blue layer rows0-4: r0: . B B B B r1: . B B . . r2: . B B B . r3: . . B B B r4: . B B B . Azure layer rows5-9: r5: . A A . . r6: A . . A . r7: . A . . A r8: . . A . . r9: A . A . A Magenta layer rows10-14: r10: . M . M M r11: . . M M M r12: . M . . . r13: . M M . M r14: . . . . . Now compute output cell (i,j) for i=0..4, j=0..4. i0: look at rows: blue r0, azure r5, magenta r10. col0: blue '.'; azure '.'; magenta '.' => '.' matches output row0 col0 '.' yes. col1: blue B; azure A; magenta M. Priority M => M. Output row0 col1 M correct. col2: blue B; azure A; magenta '.' => B (since no M). Output row0 col2 B correct. col3: blue B; azure '.'; magenta M => M. Output row0 col3 M correct. col4: blue B; azure '.'; magenta M => M. Output row0 col4 M correct. Row0 matches. i1: rows blue r1, azure r6, magenta r11. col0: blue '.'; azure A; magenta '.' => A (since no M). Output row1 col0 A correct. col1: ... [7079 chars truncated]
"Three instruments rehearse the same passage independently. When they play together, the bass drum (magenta) drowns out everything at its beats. The trumpet (blue) cuts through wherever the drum is silent. The flute (azure) is heard only in the hush where both louder instruments rest."
120b: k=1
See: A long score divided into three staves of equal length — one for drums, one for trumpet, one for flute — each marking scattered notes against silent measures.
Do: Collapse the three staves onto a single line. At each beat, the loudest sounding instrument is the one you hear: drum over trumpet, trumpet over flute, silence where none plays.
Grid: The full score is 15 rows by 5 columns in three 5-row staves. The combined performance is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid 15 rows x5 columns, representing three staves of 5 rows each (drums, trumpet, flute). Output is 5x5 combined. Rule: At each column (beat) and row? Actually collapse three staves onto single line: For each position (row, col) in 5x5 output, we look at the three corresponding cells from the three staves (i.e., rows 0-4 drum, 5-9 trumpet, 10-14 flute). Choose the "loudest" instrument: drum over trumpet over flute. So priority: drum (top 5 rows) > trumpet (middle 5) > flute (bottom 5). If none have a note (maybe '.' black), output '.'? In example, we need verify. Let's parse example 1. Input 15x5 given. Let's label rows 0-14. I'll write them: Row0: . B B B B Row1: . B B . . Row2: . B B B . Row3: . . B B B Row4: . B B B . Row5: . A A . . Row6: A . . A . Row7: . A . . A Row8: . . A . . Row9: A . A . A Row10: . M . M M Row11: . . M M M Row12: . M . . . Row13: . M M . M Row14: . . . . . Now output 5x5: Row0: . M B M M Row1: A B M M M Row2: . M B B A Row3: . M M B M Row4: A B B B A Now let's test rule: For each column c (0-4) and row r (0-4) output cell = first non-'.' among rows r (drum), r+5 (trumpet), r+10 (flute) in that column, with priority drum > trumpet > flute. Let's compute some cells. Take r=0,c=0: drum row0 col0 = '.'; trumpet row5 col0 = '.'; flute row10 col0 = '.' => output '.' matches output row0 col0 '.' good. r=0,c=1: drum row0 col1 = B; trumpet row5 col1 = A; flute row10 col1 = M. Priority drum B, output should be B but output is M. Hmm output row0 col1 is M. So my assumption wrong. Maybe priority reversed: flute > trumpet > drum? Let's test: flute row10 col1 = M, output M matches. So priority maybe bottom (flute) over middle over top. Let's test other cells. r=0,c=2: drum row0 col2 = B; trumpet row5 col2 = A; flute row10 col2 = '.' . Output row0 col2 = B. If priority bottom, flute '.' then go to trumpet A, but output B not A. So maybe rule: choose the most frequent color among three? Not. Let's compute: drum B, trumpet A, flute '.' => output B. So drum wins over trumpet when flute empty. So maybe rule: choose the "loudest" instrument meaning drum is loudest, but earlier we saw flute winning over drum for column1. Why? Because drum had '.' (silence). So if drum is '.' then look at trumpet, if trumpet '.' then flute. But we got flute M while trumpet A present. Wait trumpet row5 col1 = A (non '.'), but output M (flute) not A. So maybe priority: flute > drum > trumpet? Let's test other cells. r=0,c=3: drum row0 col3 = B; trumpet row5 col3 = '.'; flute row10 col3 = M. Output row0 col3 = M. So flute wins over drum when both non '.'? Yes flute M vs drum B, output M. So flute overrides drum. r=0,c=4: drum row0 col4 = B; trumpet row5 col4 = '.'; flute row10 col4 = M. Output M. Again flute wins. Thus rule: At each position, choose the "loudest" instrument: maybe flute is highest pitch? But description said drum over trumpet over flute. However metaphor may be re ... [6534 chars truncated]
"Three teams draft players for the same positions on a field. The magenta team has first pick at every position it wants. The blue team fills any position magenta passed on. The azure team gets only what's left after both have chosen."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall roster board divided into three equal sections, each team's selections scattered as colored markers against empty black slots.
Do: Merge the three rosters onto one field. Where teams compete for the same slot, magenta's pick stands; then blue's; then azure's. Unfilled positions remain vacant.
Grid: The draft board is 15 rows by 5 columns, three 5-row team sections. The final roster is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three weather fronts converge over the same region. The magenta thunderstorm is most violent and dominates wherever it appears. The blue cold front holds where storms haven't formed. The azure high-pressure zone persists only in the calm gaps untouched by either front."
120b: k=2
See: A tall weather map split into three equal forecast panels — one showing scattered thunderstorm cells, one showing cold fronts, one showing high-pressure zones — all against clear black skies.
Do: Overlay the three forecasts onto a single map. Thunderstorms overpower cold fronts; cold fronts overpower high pressure; clear skies remain only where no system reaches.
Grid: The forecast panels span 15 rows by 5 columns in three 5-row zones. The merged weather map is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 15 rows x5 columns? Actually description: three panels each 5 rows, total 15 rows, 5 columns. Output is 5x5 merging with precedence: thunderstorms (maybe B) over cold fronts (maybe A?) over high pressure (maybe M?) and clear sky '.' remains only where no system reaches. Let's map colors: In examples, we have three types: B, A, M. Output contains combination of these with precedence: B over A over M? Let's examine Example1. Input rows 1-5 panel1 (thunderstorms?) rows6-10 panel2 (cold fronts?) rows11-15 panel3 (high pressure?). Output 5x5. Let's extract panels. Example1 Input 15x5: Rows1-5: 1 . B B B B 2 . B B . . 3 . B B B . 4 . . B B B 5 . B B B . Rows6-10: 6 . A A . . 7 A . . A . 8 . A . . A 9 . . A . . 10 A . A . A Rows11-15: 11 . M . M M 12 . . M M M 13 . M . . . 14 . M M . M 15 . . . . . Now output 5x5: 1 . M B M M 2 A B M M M 3 . M B B A 4 . M M B M 5 A B B B A We need to see how each cell is determined from three panels stacked vertically. For each column (5) and row (5) we have three source cells: from panel1 row r, panel2 row r, panel3 row r? Actually panels correspond to rows groups: panel1 rows1-5 correspond to output rows? Probably each output row corresponds to a column? Wait merging: overlay three forecasts onto single map. So each cell in output is result of overlay of three cells from same column and row across panels. So for each position (i,j) where i=1..5 rows, j=1..5 columns, we have three values: panel1[i][j], panel2[i][j], panel3[i][j]. Precedence: Thunderstorms (maybe B) over cold fronts (A) over high pressure (M). Clear sky '.' remains only where no system reaches (i.e., all three are '.'). Let's test. Take position (1,1): panel1 row1 col1 = '.' ; panel2 row1 col1 = '.' ; panel3 row1 col1 = '.' . All '.' => output '.' . Indeed output (1,1) is '.'. (1,2): panel1 (row1 col2) = B ; panel2 (row6? actually row6 col2) = A? Wait row6 is ". A A . ." col2 = A . panel3 row11 col2 = '.' . So we have B, A, . Precedence B over A over M, so output B. But output (1,2) is M according to output row1 col2 = M. Hmm not matching. Let's compute correctly: Need to map rows: panel2 rows6-10 correspond to same output rows 1-5? Yes row6 corresponds to output row1, row7 to row2, etc. So for (row1, col2): panel1 row1 col2 = B ; panel2 row6 col2 = A ; panel3 row11 col2 = '.' . According to precedence B > A > M, output should be B, but actual is M. So maybe precedence different: M > B > A? Let's test. If M highest, then output would be M (since panel3 row11 col2 is '.' not M). Wait panel3 row11 col2 is '.' not M. So M not present. So why M output? Let's check values again: panel3 row11 col2 = '.' indeed. So M not present. So output M cannot be from any source? Let's verify panel3 row11 col2 maybe is '.'? Row11: ". M . M M" col2 = M? Wait row11 is ". M . M M": columns: 1 '.' 2 'M' 3 '.' 4 'M' 5 'M'. Yes col2 is M! I mis-copied. So panel3 row11 col2 = M. So we have B, A, M. Output is M. So preceden ... [7125 chars truncated]
"Three blueprints are drawn on transparencies for the same floor plan. The magenta structural walls are load-bearing and override everything. The blue partition walls stand where no structural wall exists. The azure decorative screens fill only the remaining openings."
120b: k=1
See: A tall drafting sheet with three equal blueprint layers stacked vertically — structural walls in magenta, partitions in blue, screens in azure — each sketched against empty black space.
Do: Stack the three transparencies. Wherever structural walls appear, they stand. Partitions fill gaps where there are no structural walls. Screens occupy only the spaces left by both. Open floor remains where nothing is drawn.
Grid: The stacked blueprints span 15 rows by 5 columns in three 5-row layers. The final floor plan is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 15 rows x5 columns, representing three layers of 5 rows each: top layer structural walls (magenta M), middle partitions (blue B), bottom screens (azure A). Actually description: three equal blueprint layers stacked vertically — structural walls in magenta, partitions in blue, screens in azure — each sketched against empty black space. So first 5 rows correspond to magenta? Let's examine example 1 input: 15 rows. Let's separate into three 5-row layers. Rows1-5: 1 . B B B B 2 . B B . . 3 . B B B . 4 . . B B B 5 . B B B . Rows6-10: 6 . A A . . 7 A . . A . 8 . A . . A 9 . . A . . 10 A . A . A Rows11-15: 11 . M . M M 12 . . M M M 13 . M . . . 14 . M M . M 15 . . . . . Output 5x5: Row1 . M B M M Row2 A B M M M Row3 . M B B A Row4 . M M B M Row5 A B B B A We need to see how stacking works. According to description: Stack three transparencies. Wherever structural walls appear, they stand. Partitions fill gaps where there are no structural walls. Screens occupy only the spaces left by both. Open floor remains where nothing is drawn. Interpretation: For each cell (column, row) in final 5x5, we look at the three layers (top to bottom). Structural walls = magenta (M). Partitions = blue (B). Screens = azure (A). In input, the layers are in order? In example, top layer (rows1-5) contains B's (blue) not M. So maybe order is: first layer is partitions (blue), second is screens (azure), third is structural walls (magenta). Let's verify: In output, many M appear where there were M in third layer? Let's check cell (row1,col2). Input third layer row? third layer rows11-15. Row11 col2 is '.' (since row11 ". M . M M": col2 = M). Wait row11 col2 = M. So at final row1 col2 (output row1 col2 = M). That matches M present in third layer row11 col2. So mapping: final row1 corresponds to input row11? Actually stacking: top of final corresponds to top of each layer? The three layers each 5 rows; when stacked, they overlay to produce final 5 rows. So final row i corresponds to row i of each layer (i from 1 to5). So final row1 uses rows1,6,11 from input. Let's test: final row1 col2 = M. Input rows: row1 col2 = B, row6 col2 = '.'? row6 ". A A . .": col2 = A, row11 col2 = M. According to rule: structural walls (M) dominate; if present, output M. Indeed M present in third layer, output M. Good. Now final row1 col1 = '.' output. Input: row1 col1 '.'; row6 col1 '.'; row11 col1 '.' => none, output '.'. Final row1 col3 = B output. Input: row1 col3 B, row6 col3 A, row11 col3 '.' . Since no M, partitions fill gaps where no structural walls. So if B present in any layer (maybe top layer), and no M, output B? But also screens occupy only spaces left by both (i.e., where no M and no B). So A appears only if no M and no B. Let's test final row1 col5 output M (since M present). Indeed M present row11 col5 = M. Check final row2: output row2 col1 = A. Input rows: row2 col1 '.'; row7 col1 A; row12 col1 '.' . No M, B? row2 col1 '.'; row7 co ... [4948 chars truncated]
"Three armies march across the same contested territory. The magenta legion is unstoppable — it holds every square it occupies. The blue regiment controls ground the legion hasn't claimed. The azure scouts hold only territory neither force has taken."
120b: k=1
See: A tall battlefield map divided into three equal campaign zones, each showing scattered troop positions in a different color against unoccupied black terrain.
Do: Resolve the territorial dispute. The legion's positions are absolute; the regiment holds where the legion is absent; the scouts keep only what both others have ignored. Unclaimed ground stays neutral.
Grid: The campaign map is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row zones. The final territorial control map is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 15x5, divided into three zones of 5 rows each. Output is 5x5. Likely combine zones using operations: legion positions absolute, regiment holds where legion absent, scouts keep only what both others have ignored. Metaphor: three colors: maybe B, A, M correspond to legion, regiment, scouts? In example, input zones: first zone rows0-4 contain B and . ; second zone rows5-9 contain A and . ; third zone rows10-14 contain M and . . Output contains mixture of B, A, M. We need to see rule: "legion's positions are absolute; the regiment holds where the legion is absent; the scouts keep only what both others have ignored. Unclaimed ground stays neutral." Interpretation: three layers: legion (first zone), regiment (second), scouts (third). Output cell determined by priority: if legion (first zone) has a color (non-.) then output that color (absolute). Else if regiment (second zone) has a color, then output that color (holds where legion absent). Else if scouts (third zone) has a color, but only keep where both others have ignored (i.e., both first and second zones are .). So scouts only appear if both first and second zones are . at that position. Otherwise output . (neutral) if none. Thus output cell = first non-blank in order: zone1 else zone2 else zone3 (but only if zone1 and zone2 are .). That matches description. Check with example: Let's test a few cells. We need to reconstruct example input zones. Example input 15x5 lines: I'll index rows 0-14. Rows: 0 ". B B B B" 1 ". B B . ." 2 ". B B B ." 3 ". . B B B" 4 ". B B B ." 5 ". A A . ." 6 "A . . A ." 7 ". A . . A" 8 ". . A . ." 9 "A . A . A" 10 ". M . M M" 11 ". . M M M" 12 ". M . . ." 13 ". M M . M" 14 ". . . . ." Now output 5x5: 0 ". M B M M" 1 "A B M M M" 2 ". M B B A" 3 ". M M B M" 4 "A B B B A" Let's compute using rule. Take position (row0,col0) across zones: zone1 row0 col0 = '.' ; zone2 row5 col0 = '.' ; zone3 row10 col0 = '.' => output '.' matches output row0 col0 '.' good. (0,1): zone1 row0 col1 = 'B' => output B? But output row0 col1 is 'M' not B. Hmm conflict. Wait maybe zones are not rows 0-4,5-9,10-14 but columns? But description says three equal campaign zones each showing scattered troop positions in a different color. Could be vertical zones (columns). Input 15 rows by 5 columns, three zones of 5 rows each (makes sense). So our rule gave B but output M. So maybe mapping of colors: legion = M? Let's see. In output, many M appear where zone1 had B? Let's examine (0,1) zone1 B, zone2 A, zone3 M. According to rule, legion absolute maybe corresponds to third zone? Let's test. If legion = third zone (M), then output would be M (since zone3 has M) regardless of others. That matches (0,1) output M. Check (0,2): zone1 row0 col2 = B, zone2 row5 col2 = A, zone3 row10 col2 = '.' . Output row0 col2 = B. If legion = third zone, not present, then regiment holds where legion absent: maybe regiment = first zone? Let's think. We need mapping: three colors ... [5604 chars truncated]
"Three spotlights of different colors are aimed at the same stage. The magenta spotlight is brightest and washes out any other color where it shines. The blue light shows through only where magenta doesn't reach. The azure glow is visible only in the shadows left by both brighter lights."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tall stage rigging diagram showing three banks of lights — magenta, blue, and azure — each casting scattered pools of color against the dark black stage.
Do: Turn on all three banks simultaneously. The brightest light wins at each spot on stage: magenta overpowers blue, blue overpowers azure, and darkness remains where no light falls.
Grid: The rigging plan is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row light banks. The lit stage is 5 rows by 5 columns.
"Three ground covers are planted in the same bed at different times. The magenta creeper, planted last, smothers everything beneath it. The blue moss holds where the creeper hasn't spread. The azure clover survives only in the bare patches left by both."
120b: k=1
See: A tall garden bed divided into three equal planting zones — each showing a different ground cover scattered against bare black soil.
Do: Let the three ground covers compete for the same soil. The magenta creeper dominates wherever it has taken root; blue moss persists in the gaps; azure clover clings to whatever remains. Bare soil shows where nothing has grown.
Grid: The garden bed is 15 rows by 5 columns with three 5-row planting zones. The mature bed is 5 rows by 5 columns.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 15x5, three zones of 5 rows each. Output is 5x5. So we compress zones into one? In example, input 15x5, output 5x5. The description: three ground covers compete for same soil. Magenta dominates wherever it has taken root; blue persists in gaps; azure clover clings to whatever remains. Bare soil shows where nothing has grown. So likely each zone corresponds to a color: first zone maybe blue B, second azure A, third magenta M. They compete: for each cell (column) across the three zones, we decide final color based on priority: M > B > A > .? Let's test with example. We need to reconstruct example input zones. Example 1 input (15 rows). Let's label rows 1-15. Rows: 1 . B B B B 2 . B B . . 3 . B B B . 4 . . B B B 5 . B B B . 6 . A A . . 7 A . . A . 8 . A . . A 9 . . A . . 10 A . A . A 11 . M . M M 12 . . M M M 13 . M . . . 14 . M M . M 15 . . . . . Now zones: rows1-5 zone1, rows6-10 zone2, rows11-15 zone3. We need to produce output 5x5 rows. Let's compute per column (5 columns). For each column, we have three values (one from each zone) maybe aggregated across rows? Actually each zone is 5x5, same size as output. So maybe we overlay zones: zone1 provides B pattern, zone2 provides A pattern, zone3 provides M pattern. Then competition: for each cell position (row, col) we look at three values (from each zone) and decide final based on priority: M > B > A > . (maybe . is black). Let's test. Take position (row1,col1) in each zone: zone1 row1 col1 = '.' ; zone2 row1 (overall row6) col1 = '.' ; zone3 row1 (row11) col1 = '.' . All '.' => output should be '.'? In example output row1 col1 is '.' indeed (output first row: ". M B M M"? Wait output rows given: Output: . M B M M A B M M M . M B B A . M M B M A B B B A Let's map coordinates. Row1 col1 '.' matches. Now position (row1,col2): zone1 row1 col2 = 'B'; zone2 row1 col2 = '.'; zone3 row1 col2 = 'M'. According to priority M > B > A > . => M dominates, output row1 col2 is 'M' (yes). Good. Row1 col3: zone1 row1 col3 = 'B'; zone2 row1 col3 = '.'? row6 col3 = 'A'? Wait row6 is ". A A . ." Actually row6 (overall) is ". A A . .": col3 = 'A'. zone3 row1 col3 = '.' (row11 col3 = '.'). So we have B, A, . . Priority M > B > A > . => B dominates over A, output row1 col3 is 'B' (yes). Good. Row1 col4: zone1 row1 col4 = 'B'; zone2 row1 col4 = '.'? row6 col4 = '.' ; zone3 row1 col4 = 'M' (row11 col4 = 'M'). So M dominates, output 'M' (yes). Row1 col5: zone1 row1 col5 = 'B'; zone2 row1 col5 = '.'? row6 col5='.' ; zone3 row1 col5='M' (row11 col5='M'). Output 'M' (yes). So rule matches. Check another cell: output row2 col1 = 'A'. Let's compute: row2 corresponds to overall row2 in each zone? Actually output row2 corresponds to zone row2 (i.e., overall rows 2,7,12). Row2 col1: zone1 row2 col1 = '.' ; zone2 row2 (overall row7) col1 = 'A' ; zone3 row2 (row12) col1 = '.' . So we have A only, output 'A' matches. Row2 col2: zone1 row2 col ... [3647 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has three structural layers: (1) A single-cell-thick border frame of a uniform color (the 'frame color' — azure, yellow, magenta, or blue depending on the puzzle instance) forming the outermost row/column on all four sides. (2) A green (G) spine consisting of two parallel green lines running either vertically or horizontally through the interior, dividing the grid into an interior band (between the green lines) and exterior regions (outside the green lines but inside the border). (3) Inside the spine band, a repeating pattern of red (R) and black (.) cells. The exterior regions (between the spine and the border) are all black.
Do: 1. Identify the frame color (the uniform color forming the 1-cell border on all four sides). 2. Identify the green spine — two parallel green lines running in the same direction (both horizontal or both vertical). 3. Note the pattern of red and black cells inside the spine band. 4. Build the output grid (same dimensions as input): (a) Every cell on a green spine line becomes G, extended across the full width or height of the grid. (b) For each row (if spine is vertical) or column (if spine is horizontal), examine what color appears in the spine interior for that row/column. If the spine interior contains R for that row/column, fill all non-green cells in that row/column with R (inside the spine) and the frame color (outside the spine). If the spine interior contains black (.) for that row/column, fill all non-green cells with black (.). 5. The border frame is removed — it does not appear in the output. The frame color only appears in the exterior regions of rows/columns whose spine interior contains red.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. There is no border frame. The green spine lines span the full extent of the grid. The grid is filled according to the spine's red/black pattern: red rows or columns get the former frame color outside the spine, and black rows or columns remain entirely black outside the spine.
"A cocoon dissolves, and its pigment is summoned inward only where the heartbeat pulses."
120b: k=1
See: A chrysalis of uniform color wraps the entire grid — a single-cell shell holding everything in. Inside, two parallel green veins run like arteries through the body, forming a narrow channel. Within that channel, a heartbeat pattern alternates: some segments pulse red, others lie dormant and dark. The flesh between the veins and the shell is entirely dark — asleep, waiting.
Do: The chrysalis breaks open and vanishes. But its color doesn't disappear — it becomes a dye that the red pulses can summon. Each red heartbeat in the channel calls out across its entire row or column, flooding the flesh beyond the veins with the old shell color, as if the pulse radiates outward through the green walls. Where the channel is dark and still, no signal is sent — those rows or columns remain black and silent from wall to wall. The green veins themselves stretch to span the full body, no longer caged by the shell. Think of it as: red pulses broadcast the cocoon's color outward; silence broadcasts nothing.
Grid: The output is the same size as the input. The shell is gone. The green veins now run edge to edge. Rows or columns with a red pulse in the channel are vivid — the old shell color fills everything outside the veins, red fills between them. Rows or columns where the channel was dark remain entirely black outside the veins. The grid breathes in a rhythm dictated by the heartbeat pattern.
We need to understand rule from example. Input grid 19x19? Let's count: Example 1 input appears 19x19 with border of A (azure) around. Inside there is a vertical green column? Actually pattern: column 7? Let's map coordinates: each row has 19 entries. The border rows (first and last) are all A. The leftmost and rightmost columns are A. Inside, there is a vertical line of G at column 7? Let's see row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after A, six '.' then G, then R R R, then G, then rest '.' then A. So column indices: 1 A, 2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 G? Wait count: after A (col1), there are six '.' (col2-7), then G at col8, then R at col9,10,11, then G at col12, then '.' rest col13-? Let's count total 19. So green column at col8 and col12? Actually two green columns forming veins? In example, there are two parallel green veins vertical? Yes they are at columns 8 and 12 (distance 4 apart). The channel between them includes three columns (9-11) where there may be R or '.'. The pattern: In some rows, the channel (cols9-11) is filled with RRR (red heartbeat) else '.' (dark). In example, rows 2-4 have RRR, rows5-7 have '.' (dark), rows8-10 have RRR, rows11-13 '.' etc. So alternating groups of three rows? Actually pattern: groups of 3 rows with RRR, then 3 rows with '.' etc. So heartbeat pattern vertical? Actually rows. Now output: The border A disappears (becomes '.'?) In output first row is all '.' (black). Indeed shell color (A) becomes dye used to fill outside of veins where red present. The output shows that rows that had RRR in channel become filled with A (the old shell color) outside the green veins, while rows with '.' remain '.' outside. Specifically output row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So outside the two green columns (col8 and col12) the cells become A (the shell color) for that row because there was red in channel. The green columns remain G, red remain R. The rest of grid (outside) becomes A for those rows. For rows without red, output row5: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." i.e., outside remains '.' (black). So rule: For each row, if any red present in the channel (between the two green veins), then fill entire row (outside the veins) with the shell color (the color that formed the border). If no red, keep black. Similarly columns? The description mentions rows or columns with red pulse broadcast across its entire row or column. In example, the veins are vertical, so channel is vertical? Actually red pulses are in rows, but they broadcast across row. Could also be columns if veins horizontal. So rule: Determine the two parallel green lines (veins) that are continuous across entire grid after transformation. They may be vertical or horizontal. The region between them is the channel. For each line (row or column) that contains at least one red cell within the channel, fill the entire line outside the veins with the shell color (the color that formed the outer border). For lines without red, keep black. ... [11667 chars truncated]
"A cell membrane dissolves, but its proteins are redistributed along the rows where the chromosome's active genes glow — silent genes leave the cytoplasm empty."
120b: k=3
See: A membrane of uniform pigment encases the cell. Twin filaments of cartilage run through the interior, with genes alternating between active (red) and dormant (black) along their length. The space between filaments and membrane is clear.
Do: The membrane lyses. The cartilage filaments extend to span the entire cell body. Where an active gene sits between the filaments, the former membrane pigment floods outward through that cross-section. Where a gene is dormant, the cross-section remains void.
Grid: Output matches input dimensions. Cartilage lines span fully. Active-gene rows/columns show the old membrane color outside the filaments and red between them. Dormant rows/columns are entirely black outside the filaments.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. Interpretation: There's a "membrane" of uniform pigment encasing the cell: that is the border of the grid (outermost rows/columns) of a single color (e.g., A in example1, Y in example2, M in example3, B in test). Inside there are "twin filaments of cartilage" - likely two lines (vertical/horizontal?) of a different color (maybe G in examples). Indeed in example1, inside there are vertical lines of G? Let's examine input1: grid 19x19? Actually 19 rows, 19 columns. Outer border A. Inside there is a column of G at column 7? Let's index: Input row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So there is G at column7, then RRR, then G at column11. So there are two vertical lines of G? Actually G appears at column7 and column11 across many rows. Those are the "cartilage filaments". Between them there are sequences of R (active genes) and . (dormant). The pattern: rows where there are RRR between Gs correspond to active gene rows; rows where there are . . . between Gs correspond to dormant rows. Indeed rows 2-4 have RRR between Gs; rows 5-7 have . . .; rows 8-10 have RRR; rows 11-13 . . .; rows 14-16 RRR; rows 17-18 . . . . So alternating. Transformation: Output shows that the outer border (membrane) "lyses" i.e., disappears (becomes black .) except where active gene rows/columns cause flood outward with old membrane color (A) outside the filaments. In output1, rows that were active (with RRR) now have A across entire row except the G columns remain G and the RRR remain R? Let's check output row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". Indeed outer border A now fills entire row (including previous border positions). The G columns remain G, RRR remain R. The rest become A. For dormant rows (with . . .), output row5: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So they become all black (.) except the G columns remain G. So rule: For each row (or column?) where the interior between the two G filaments contains R (active), fill the entire row (including border) with the border color (original membrane color). For rows where interior is . (dormant), fill with black (.) except keep the G filaments. Similarly columns? In example1, also columns between G filaments? Actually the transformation also applies to columns? Let's see output column wise: The G columns remain G throughout. The R columns remain R only where rows active. In dormant rows, the interior between Gs is . (black). So columns not changed. But description mentions "cartilage filaments extend to span the entire cell body". In input, G lines are vertical? Actually they are vertical lines of G at columns 7 and 11 spanning many rows, but there are also horizontal lines? In example1, there are also G rows? Let's see row6 etc: row6 input: "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A". So G at same columns, but no horizontal G line. So cartilage filaments are vertical lines only? But description says twin filaments run through interior, maybe two pa ... [11644 chars truncated]
"The nebula's shell disperses and the twin jets extend to infinity — only the bands where stars ignite carry the shell's color outward, while dark bands collapse into void."
120b: k=3
See: A nebula shell of uniform color. Two green plasma jets run through the core. Between them, star-forming bands (red) and dark bands (black). Outside the jets, empty space.
Do: Disperse the shell. Extend jets to span the full field. Star-forming bands push the shell's color outward. Dark bands remain void.
Grid: Same dimensions. Jets span fully. Star bands: red between jets, shell-color outside. Dark bands: black outside jets.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have metaphor: nebula shell uniform color, two green plasma jets run through core. Between them, star-forming bands (red) and dark bands (black). Outside jets, empty space. Goal: Disperse shell. Extend jets to span full field. Star-forming bands push the shell's color outward. Dark bands remain void. Interpretation: Input grid has a border of uniform color (shell) maybe A in example1, Y in example2, M in example3, B in test. Inside there are two vertical green columns (jets) maybe? Actually in examples, green appears as vertical line? Let's examine example1 input: size 19x19? Actually 19 rows, 19 columns. Border of A (azure) around edges. Inside there is a vertical column of G at column 7? Let's index: row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So there is G at col7, then RRR, then G at col11. So two green columns separated by three reds. Also there are rows where only G columns with no reds (like row5: "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A"). So pattern: two vertical green lines (jets) spanning many rows, with occasional red blocks between them (star-forming bands). Also black '.' appears elsewhere (empty). The border A is shell. Output: The border A is moved outward? Actually output shows top row all '.' except G columns? Let's see output row1: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So top row now has G at same columns, but rest '.' (black). The border A moved down? Row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So second row now has A across except G and R region. So the border A has been shifted down one row, and also left/right? Actually originally border A was at row1 and row19 and column1 and column19. In output, border A appears in rows 2,3,4,8,9,10,14,15,16, etc. So the border A is now filling the area that was previously '.' (empty) but only outside the jets? Let's think. The rule: "Disperse the shell. Extend jets to span the full field. Star-forming bands push the shell's color outward. Dark bands remain void." Interpretation: The outer border color (shell) is spread outward from its original location, filling empty spaces (black) but not crossing the jets (green) and not crossing the dark bands (black?). Wait dark bands are black '.' originally? In metaphor, dark bands are black outside jets. In input, black '.' are everywhere else (including outside jets). So dark bands remain void (stay black) in output. So the shell color (A) should fill the empty spaces that are not blocked by jets (green) or dark bands (black). But dark bands are black, which are the same as empty spaces? Hmm. Look at output: The area outside the two green columns (i.e., left of left green and right of right green) is filled with A (shell) in many rows, but not all rows: only rows where there were originally red bands? Actually rows with red bands (star-forming) cause A to be placed in those rows across the whole width except the green columns and red region? Let's examine row2 output: A across left side, then ... [12410 chars truncated]
"The harbor walls sink beneath the waves and the twin channel markers extend to open sea — only the shipping lanes with cargo carry the harbor's paint outward, while empty lanes are swallowed by dark water."
120b: k=3
See: Harbor walls of uniform color. Two green channel markers run through the port. Between them, laden lanes (red) and empty lanes (black). Outside the markers, open water.
Do: Sink the harbor walls. Extend channel markers across the full sea. Laden lanes carry the harbor's color outward. Empty lanes become dark water.
Grid: Same dimensions. Markers span fully. Laden lanes: red between markers, harbor-color outside. Empty lanes: black outside.
We need to infer rule. From description: Harbor walls of uniform color (border). Two green channel markers run through the port. Between them, laden lanes (red) and empty lanes (black). Outside the markers, open water. Goal: Sink the harbor walls (turn border to black?). Extend channel markers across full sea. Laden lanes carry the harbor's color outward. Empty lanes become dark water. Interpretation: Input has border of a color (e.g., A in example1, Y in example2, M in example3, B in test). Inside there are two vertical green columns? Actually in examples, green markers are vertical lines? Let's examine example1 input: 19x19? Actually grid 19x19. Border of A (top row all A, bottom row all A, leftmost column all A, rightmost column all A). Inside there are two vertical green columns at column 7? Let's index: row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after left border A, there are 5 dots, then G, then R R R, then G, then rest dots, then right border A. So green markers are vertical columns at positions col7 and col11? Actually positions: columns: 1 A, 2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 G,8 R,9 R,10 R,11 G,12 .,13 .,14 .,15 .,16 .,17 .,18 .,19 A. So green markers are at col7 and col11, vertical lines of G across many rows. Red lanes between them (columns 8-10) are red. Outside markers (columns 2-6 and 12-18) are either dots (black) or sometimes other? In input, those are '.' (black). So "laden lanes" are red between markers, "empty lanes" are black outside markers. Output: border becomes '.' (black) (sink harbor walls). The green markers extend across full sea: they become full columns of G across entire grid (including border rows). Indeed output rows have G at col7 and col11 across all rows, and border rows now have '.' except G columns. Also the red lanes (laden) carry the harbor's color outward: The harbor's color is the border color (A). In output, the red lanes become A (the border color) extending outward beyond markers? Let's see output row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So red lane columns 8-10 remain R? Wait they are still R. Actually output shows G at col7, R R R at 8-10, G at 11, and outside columns become A (border color) instead of '.' . Indeed columns 2-6 become A, columns 12-18 become A. So the "laden lanes carry the harbor's color outward": the red lanes cause the border color to fill the outside area (i.e., replace '.' with border color) but only in rows where red lanes exist? Actually all rows that have red lanes (i.e., rows where there is red between markers) become filled with border color outside markers. In rows where there is no red (i.e., rows with only green markers and no red), the outside remains '.' as in output rows 1,5,6,7, etc. Indeed row1 output is all '.' except G columns. Row5 (which had only G columns and no red) output is '.' outside. So rule: For each row, if there is at least one red cell between the two green columns, then fill all cells outside the green columns (i.e., left of left green and right ... [11833 chars truncated]
"The chassis is removed and the bus lines extend across the full board — only the traces carrying current light up with the chassis color, while inactive traces go to ground."
120b: k=1
See: A chassis of uniform color. Two green bus lines run through the circuit. Between them, active traces (red) and inactive ones (black). Outside the bus, bare board.
Do: Remove the chassis. Extend bus lines across the full board. Active traces energize their rows with the chassis color. Inactive traces drop to ground.
Grid: Same dimensions. Bus lines span fully. Active rows: red between buses, chassis-color outside. Inactive rows: black outside.
We need to understand transformation. Given example 1: Input grid 19x19? Let's count. Input first line: A repeated 19 times. So 19x19. In input, outer border of A (azure) forms chassis. Inside, there are two vertical green columns? Actually look: In each row, after first A, there are . . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A. So pattern: left border A, then 6 '.' then G, then RRR, then G, then rest '.' then A. So there are two green vertical lines at column index? Let's index columns 0-18. Column0 A, columns1-6 '.' (positions 1-6), column7 G, columns8-10 R, column11 G, columns12-? '.' up to column17, column18 A. Thus there are two green columns (col7 and col11) forming bus lines. Between them (col8-10) are red active traces. Outside the bus lines (columns 1-6 and 12-17) are '.' (black). Also there are rows where pattern repeats: many rows have same pattern, but some rows have only G at those columns and '.' elsewhere (no red). Those correspond to inactive rows? Let's see rows: rows 1-3 have G RRR G. Row4 has G . . . G (no red). Row5 same, row6 same, row7 same, row8-10 have G RRR G again, etc. So pattern: some rows have active (red) between green buses, others inactive (just green). The outer border rows (0 and 18) are all A. Now output: The outer border rows become all '.' (black) except? Actually output first row: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." So border A replaced with '.' except green columns remain G? Wait first row originally all A. Output first row has '.' at columns0-5, then G at col6? Let's map: output first row: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." That's 19 entries. So at col0-5 '.' (was A), col6 G (was A), col7 '.' (was A), col8 '.' (was A), col9 '.' (was A), col10 G (was A), rest '.'. So the green bus lines have been extended across full board: they now appear in every row (including border rows) at columns where they were originally (col7 and col11? Wait output shows G at col6 and col10? Off by one due to indexing maybe). Let's compute: In input, green at column7 and column11 (0-index). In output, green at column6 and column10? Let's recount: Input row: A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A. That's 19 entries. Let's index: 0 A, 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 G,7 R,8 R,9 R,10 G,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 .,15 .,16 .,17 .,18 A. So green at col6 and col10. Yes earlier miscount. So green columns are 6 and 10. Good. Output first row: . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . So green at col6 and col10 as well. So bus lines extended to border rows. Now rows that were originally A border become '.' except green columns. Rows that were originally interior rows with active red: In output, those rows become A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A (i.e., the chassis color A fills the area outside the bus lines, while the red remains between green, and green stays). So active rows: outside region (columns left of left bus and right of right bus) become chassis color (A). Inactive rows (originally only green, no red) become all '.' except green columns? ... [13240 chars truncated]
"The titan's cage shatters and the twin pillars of the world extend from earth to sky — only the realms where sacred fire burns inherit the cage's divine radiance, while forsaken realms fall into shadow."
120b: fail
See: A cage of uniform divine color. Two green world-pillars run through the cosmos. Between them, realms of sacred fire (red) and forsaken realms (black). Outside the pillars, nothing.
Do: Shatter the cage. Extend the pillars across all of existence. Fire-realms radiate the cage's divine color outward. Forsaken realms sink into shadow.
Grid: Same dimensions. Pillars span fully. Fire realms: red between pillars, cage-color outside. Forsaken realms: black outside.
We need to infer rule from examples. Interpret metaphor: cage of uniform divine color (maybe border color). Two green world-pillars run through cosmos (vertical columns?). Between them, realms of sacred fire (red) and forsaken realms (black). Outside pillars, nothing. Transformation: Shatter cage. Extend pillars across all existence. Fire-realms radiate cage's divine color outward. Forsaken realms sink into shadow. Let's decode. In Example1: Input grid 19x19? Actually 19 rows, each 19 columns. Border is A (azure) around edges. Inside there are green columns? Let's view: In input, there are G at column 7? Actually pattern: each row has A at start and end, and interior . and G and R. The green "pillars" are vertical lines of G at column 7 and column 13? Let's count: Row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after A, six dots, then G, then three Rs, then G, then rest dots, then A. So green at positions 7 and 11? Wait indices: start A (col1). Then columns 2-6 are dots (5?). Actually there are six dots before G: ". . . . . .". That's 6. So G at col8? Let's index: col1 A, col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 G, col9 R, col10 R, col11 R, col12 G, then rest dots. So green pillars at col8 and col12 (distance 4). They are vertical lines of G throughout many rows. Red region between them (columns 9-11) forms a block of Rs. Outside pillars (left of col8 and right of col12) are either . (black) or A border. Output: The border A becomes replaced? In output, the outer border becomes . (black) except where there were A? Let's see output row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So the outer border (first 6 cells) become A (azure) now, not . . The previous interior . become A. So rule: The cage (border color A) is shattered and extended across all existence: meaning the border color fills the area outside the pillars (i.e., left and right of green columns). The fire realms (red) radiate the cage's divine color outward: meaning the red region expands outward? Actually in output, the red block remains same columns 9-11, but the A color appears on both sides of green pillars, filling the previous . area. The black (.) outside pillars becomes A? Wait outside pillars originally . (black). In output they become A (azure). So the cage color (A) spreads outward to fill those spaces. Also "Forsaken realms sink into shadow": black (.) maybe become .? But they turned into A, not . So maybe black becomes .? Let's examine: In output, there are still . in some rows: rows where there were no green pillars? Actually output rows 1,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,14,15,17,18 have . in many cells. Row1 output: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." So border A disappeared? Row1 originally all A. Output row1 becomes . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . So border A turned to . (black). So the outermost border becomes . (nothing). So "shatter the cage" maybe means remove outer border (set to .). Then "extend pillars across all existence": the green columns become ... [12925 chars truncated]
"The ballroom rope is unclipped and the twin formation lines extend across the entire floor — only the rows where dancers are spinning wear the rope's color in their ribbons, while empty rows dim to darkness."
120b: k=2
See: A velvet rope of uniform color rings the floor. Two green formation lines run through the middle. Between them, spinning dancers (red) and empty positions (black). Outside the lines, open floor.
Do: Unclip the rope. Extend formation lines wall to wall. Dancer rows trail the rope's color across the floor outside the lines. Empty rows go dark.
Grid: Same dimensions. Formation lines span fully. Dancer rows: red between lines, rope-color outside. Empty rows: black outside.
We need to understand transformation. We have metaphor: velvet rope of uniform color rings the floor. Two green formation lines run through the middle. Between them, spinning dancers (red) and empty positions (black). Outside the lines, open floor. Interpretation: Input grid has a border of a uniform color (rope) surrounding. Inside there are two green lines (horizontal?) through middle. Between them there are red blocks (dancers) and black empty positions (.) inside the region between lines. Outside the lines (i.e., above top green line and below bottom green line) there is open floor (maybe original border color? Actually rope is removed, and the formation lines extend wall to wall, and dancer rows trail the rope's color across the floor outside the lines. Empty rows go dark.) Let's examine Example 1. Input grid size 19x19? Actually 19 rows, each 19 columns. Border of A (azure) around edges (first and last rows all A, first and last columns all A). Inside there are two vertical green lines? Let's view: In input, column 7? Actually each row shows "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So there is a column of G at position 7 (0-index maybe 6) and another G at position 11? Wait pattern: after 6 dots, G, space, then R R R, then G, then rest dots. So there are two green columns separated by three reds. So green lines are vertical lines (columns). Two green lines run through middle (vertical). The rope is the border of A. Between them (i.e., columns between the two green columns) there are red dancers and empty positions (black .). Actually inside between the green columns, there are three columns: first column after left G is R, then R, then R, then G (right line). So there are three red columns between the green lines. In some rows, those red columns are present; in other rows they are '.' (empty). Indeed rows where there is "G R R R G" have reds; rows where there is "G . . . G" have empties. Now output: The border A is removed? In output, first row is ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So border becomes '.' (black) except the green columns remain? Actually first row originally all A. Output first row now has '.' except green columns at positions 7 and 11 (still G). So rope color (A) is removed and replaced with '.' (black) outside the lines. The green lines have been extended to full width? Let's see output rows 2-4: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So now the rows that originally had reds between green lines now have A (original rope color) on the left side of left green line and right side of right green line, extending to edges. So the rope color (A) now fills the area outside the green lines for rows that had reds. For rows that originally had empties (dots) between green lines, output rows have '.' outside the green lines (i.e., black). Indeed rows 5-7 output: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So they are all '.' except green columns. Thus rule: For each row, if the segment between the two green lines contains an ... [12840 chars truncated]
"The continental shelf crumbles and the twin fault lines extend across the whole plate — only the strata with magma veins are stained with the shelf's mineral color, while cold strata erode to bedrock."
120b: fail
See: A continental shelf of uniform mineral color. Two green fault lines run through the crust. Between them, magma veins (red) and cold rock (black). Outside the faults, bare stone.
Do: Crumble the shelf. Extend fault lines across the full plate. Magma strata push the shelf's mineral color outward. Cold strata erode to bare bedrock.
Grid: Same dimensions. Faults span fully. Magma strata: red between faults, shelf-color outside. Cold strata: black outside faults.
We need to understand the transformation rule from example. We have input grid with border of A (azure) around, interior with . black, G green vertical line? Let's examine example 1. Input size 19x19? Actually rows 19, columns 19. Border of A on outermost rows and columns. Inside there is a pattern: a vertical green line at column 7? Let's index columns 0-18. Row1 (index0) all A. Row2: A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A. So at col0 A, col1-5 ., col6 G, col7-9 R, col10 G, rest . then col18 A. So green line at col6 and col10? Actually two green columns? Wait there is G at col6 and col10. So two green vertical lines separated by three reds. In rows where there is G and R pattern, they form a rectangle region between the two green lines: columns 6-10 inclusive? Actually G at col6, R at 7-9, G at 10. So a stripe of width 5 (G RRR G). This appears in many rows, but some rows have only G at col6 and col10 with dots between (like rows 5-7). So there are "fault lines" green columns at col6 and col10. Between them there are magma (red) in some rows, and black elsewhere. The output: The border of A is replaced? Let's see output row1: . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . (row0). So top border becomes black except green columns at col6 and col10 remain G, rest . . So the outer border A turned into . (black) except the green fault lines extended across full plate (top to bottom). Indeed in output, the green columns at col6 and col10 are G across all rows (including border). The red region (magma) appears as a block of R between the green columns, but only in rows where originally there were R? Let's see output rows 1-3 (index1-3) are A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A. So the outer border now becomes A (azure) in those rows? Wait row1 output: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So the outermost columns (col0 and col18) are A, also columns 1-5 are A, columns 11-17 are A. So the shelf-color (originally A) is pushed outward beyond the fault lines, filling the area outside the green columns. Inside the green columns, the red block remains where originally present, but also maybe extended? Let's compare: In input, rows 1-3 had red block at columns 7-9. In output, same rows have red block at same columns. So red unchanged. Rows where there were only green columns with dots between (no red), output rows have green columns but the area between them becomes . (black) (cold strata erode to bare bedrock). Indeed rows 4-6 output: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." (all black except green columns). So the interior between green columns becomes black. Rows where there were green columns with red block later (rows 7-9) output: same as rows 1-3 (A outside, G RRR G). So pattern repeats. Thus rule: Identify two vertical green lines (fault lines). Extend them across entire grid (full height). Then for each cell: - If cell is between the two green lines (i.e., column between them exclusive), then: - If original cell was red, keep red. - Else (original ... [8906 chars truncated]
"A pastry crust is broken open, and its golden color seeps into the filling only along the layers where jam was spread — plain layers stay dry."
120b: fail
See: A baked shell of uniform color surrounds a layered interior. Two strips of green fondant run parallel through the center, with alternating stripes of red jam and bare dough between them. The space outside the fondant strips is bare.
Do: Crack the crust away. Extend the fondant strips edge to edge. For every layer that had jam between the fondant, soak the outer regions with the crust's color. Layers without jam stay dry and bare.
Grid: Same dimensions. Fondant lines span the full grid. Jam layers show crust-color outside and red inside the fondant. Bare layers are black everywhere outside the fondant.
We need to understand the transformation rule from example. We have input grid with border of A (azure) around, interior with pattern: two vertical green columns? Let's examine example 1 input. Grid size? Looks 19x19 (since 19 rows). Input first row all A. Last row all A. First column all A, last column all A. Inside there is a region of G column? Actually pattern: column 7? Let's index columns 0-18. Input rows 1-17 have '.' and G and R. From visual: In each interior row, there is a vertical line of G at column 6? Let's count: row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after A, there are 5 '.' then G, then RRR, then G, then rest '.' then A. So G at col6, G at col10? Actually after G then three R then G. So pattern: G at col6, R at 7-9, G at 10. So two green columns separated by three red columns. This repeats in many rows, but some rows have only G at those columns with '.' elsewhere (no R). Those are "bare layers". So the "fondant strips" are the green columns (vertical lines). The "jam layers" are rows where between the green columns there are red cells (R). The "crust" is the outer border of A (azure). The "bare layers" have '.' (black) between green columns. Transformation description: "Crack the crust away. Extend the fondant strips edge to edge. For every layer that had jam between the fondant, soak the outer regions with the crust's color. Layers without jam stay dry and bare." Interpretation: Output: The green columns become continuous vertical lines across whole grid (they already are). The outer region (outside the green columns) becomes either crust color (A) if that row originally had red jam between greens, else remains black '.'. Looking at output: Row2 (index1) output: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So outer region (columns 0-5 and 11-18) become A (crust) instead of '.' . Row2 originally had jam (R). So outer region turned to A. Row5 (index4) originally had no jam (just G . . . G). Output row5: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." So outer region stays '.' (black). Indeed. Also note that rows that originally had jam become fully A outside, but also the green columns remain G, red remain R. The border A rows become '.'? In output first row is all '.' (since crust removed). Indeed first row originally all A, becomes all '.' (black). Similarly last row becomes '.'. Also rows that originally were border (first and last) become '.'. Thus rule: For each row, if there is any red cell (R) between the two green columns (i.e., jam), then replace all cells outside the green columns (including original border) with the border color (the color of the outermost border in input, which is A). If no red between greens, keep those outer cells as '.' (black). Also the green columns remain unchanged, red remain unchanged. The border rows become '.' because they have no green columns? Actually they have no green columns, but they are considered outer region; they become '.' (since no jam). So they become black. Now test in ... [12597 chars truncated]
"The concert hall walls vanish, and the reverb of each struck note carries the hall's resonance outward — but only rests produce silence in every direction."
120b: k=2
See: A concert hall's walls form a uniform-colored border. Two parallel green soundboards run through the stage. Between them, some positions hold struck notes (red) and others hold rests (black). Beyond the soundboards, silence.
Do: Remove the hall walls. Extend the soundboards to infinite length. Each struck note sends the hall's former acoustic color rippling outward along its row or column. Rests propagate nothing — their rows stay silent.
Grid: Same size grid, no walls. Soundboard lines span fully. Note positions have red between boards and wall-color outside. Rest positions are black throughout.
We need to infer rule. From description: border of uniform color (wall) removed, soundboards are two parallel green lines. Between them, red notes and black rests. Outside boards, wall color. Output: no border, green lines extend full length, red notes propagate outward along row/column? Let's examine example1. Input grid size 19x19? Actually 19 rows, 19 columns. Border color A (azure) around. Inside, there are two vertical green columns? Let's view: In input, rows 2-... there is pattern: column 7? Let's index columns 0-18. Input row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after A at col0, then '.' at col1-5, then G at col6, then R R R at col7-9, then G at col10, then '.' rest, then A at col18. So green columns at col6 and col10, with three reds between them (col7-9). That's a horizontal segment? Actually green columns vertical lines? They are at same columns across rows where pattern repeats. So two parallel green vertical lines (soundboards) with reds between them (notes) in some rows. Also there are rows where only green columns with no reds (rests). The border A surrounds. Output: border removed, green lines extend full height (i.e., all rows have G at col6 and col10). Red notes propagate outward along row? Let's see output row2 (index1): "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So border removed? Actually output still has A's but now they are inside? Wait output row2 shows A's where previously border was '.'? Let's examine: Output row2 (second row) has A's in columns 0-5, then G,R,R,R,G, then A's columns 11-18. So the border color A now fills the area outside the green lines, not just border. The original border A was only outermost row/col. In output, the area outside the green columns (i.e., left of col6 and right of col10) is filled with A (the original border color). Also rows where there were no reds (rests) become all '.'? Let's check row5 (index4) input: "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A". So only greens, no reds. Output row5: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So left/right become '.' (black) not A. So rule: For rows where there is at least one red between greens, the outside area becomes border color (A). For rows with only greens (no reds), outside becomes black '.'. Also note that green lines extend fully: all rows have G at col6 and col10 in output, even rows that originally had '.' there? Actually rows 2-4 had G already, rows 5-7 had G, rows 8-10 had G, etc. In output, every row has G at those columns. Yes. Now what about propagation of reds? In rows with reds, they stay same positions? In output row2, reds remain at col7-9. In rows with reds, they also appear in rows where originally there were reds? Yes. But also note that rows with reds originally had border A at ends; after transformation, those border A become A across whole outside region (left/right). So basically fill outside region with border color if that row contains any red (note). If row contains only greens (no reds), fill outside with black. ... [12536 chars truncated]
"The stadium fence comes down and the field markings stretch to the horizon — only the lanes where runners are sprinting get painted in the stadium's colors, while empty lanes fade to dirt."
120b: fail
See: A stadium perimeter of one color. Two green lane dividers run parallel inside. Between them, some lanes have sprinters (red), others are empty (black). Outside the dividers, all lanes are bare.
Do: Tear down the perimeter. Stretch the lane dividers across the full track. Lanes with sprinters receive the old perimeter color outside the dividers. Empty lanes turn to bare ground.
Grid: Same grid dimensions. Green dividers span edge to edge. Sprinter lanes: red between dividers, perimeter-color outside. Empty lanes: black everywhere outside dividers.
We need to understand rule. From description: stadium perimeter of one color (the outer border). Two green lane dividers run parallel inside. Between them, some lanes have sprinters (red), others empty (black). Outside dividers, all lanes are bare. Transformation: Tear down perimeter. Stretch lane dividers across full track. Lanes with sprinters receive old perimeter color outside dividers. Empty lanes turn to bare ground. Interpretation: Input grid has outer border of a color (e.g., A in example1, Y in example2, M in example3). Inside there are two parallel green lines (vertical? horizontal?) Actually look at examples. Example1 input: size 19x19? Outer border A. Inside there are vertical green columns? Let's view: rows show "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So there is a green column at column 7? Actually after 6 dots, G, then RRR, then G, then dots, then A at end. So green column appears at column 7 and column 11? Wait pattern: . . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . . So G at col7, then RRR at col8-10, then G at col11. So two green columns separated by three red columns. That's like two parallel green lane dividers with a lane of red between them. Also there are multiple rows where green columns appear but no reds (empty lanes). So the green columns are vertical lines. Thus the "lane dividers" are vertical green columns. They run from top to bottom but only within inner area? In input they appear only in rows where there is content; but they are continuous across rows? Let's see rows: many rows have same pattern. Some rows have only green columns with no reds (empty lanes). So the green columns are continuous across all rows (except border rows). Indeed rows 2-4 have G RRR G; rows 5-7 have G . . . G; etc. So green columns are vertical lines spanning many rows. Now transformation: Output shows that the green columns become continuous across entire grid (including border rows?) Actually output rows: first row is ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So top row now has green at columns 7 and 11, but no border color A. The outer border A is removed (replaced by .). The green columns now extend to top and bottom rows (they were already there? In input top row had A border, not green). So they are stretched across full height. Also the red lanes (sprinters) become colored with the old perimeter color (A) outside the dividers. In output, rows where there were reds between green columns now have A's in those positions (and also A's outside the green columns?). Let's examine output row 2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So the row now has A's on left side of first green column (positions 1-6) and on right side after second green column (positions 12-19). The reds remain red? Actually they remain R? In output they are still R? Wait row shows "G R R R G". So reds unchanged. The perimeter color A appears outside the green columns, filling the rest of row. Thus rule: Replace outer border color with black (.)? Actually they become '.' ... [12542 chars truncated]
"The pressure dome collapses — lightning channels extend to the horizon, and only the bands where thunder rolls carry the storm's color outward. Calm bands dissipate into clear sky."
120b: fail
See: A pressure dome of uniform color encloses the atmosphere. Two green lightning channels run parallel inside. Between them, thunderclaps (red) and calm patches (black) alternate. Outside the channels, still air.
Do: Collapse the dome. Extend the lightning channels across the full sky. Thunder bands push the dome's color outward in their rows. Calm bands dissolve to clear sky.
Grid: Same dimensions, no dome. Green channels span fully. Thunder rows: red between channels, dome-color outside. Calm rows: black outside channels.
We need to understand transformation rule from example. We have input grid with outer border of A (azure) forming a dome. Inside there are green vertical columns? Let's examine example 1 input. Grid size 19x19? Actually rows 19, columns 19. Outer border rows 1 and 19 are all A. Columns 1 and 19 also A. Inside there are patterns: column 7? Let's map coordinates (1-index). In input, rows 2-4 have "G R R R G" at columns 7-11? Let's count: Row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after A (col1), then 5 dots (col2-6), then G at col7, R at col8-10, G at col11, then dots col12-? then A at col19. So green columns at col7 and col11, red block between them columns 8-10. This pattern repeats in multiple rows, but there are also rows where only green columns with dots between (no red). Those are rows 5-7 etc. Thus the metaphor: dome = outer border of A. Two green lightning channels run parallel inside (columns 7 and 11). Between them, thunderclaps (red) and calm patches (black) alternate. Outside the channels, still air (dots). So rows with red between green are "thunder rows". Rows with black (dots) between green are "calm rows". The dome color (A) is outside the channels in thunder rows, but in calm rows outside channels is also dot? Wait look at row5 (calm row): "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A". So outside channels (col2-6 and col12-18) are dots, not A. So dome color only appears in rows where there is red between green (thunder rows). Indeed rows 2-4 have A's outside? Actually row2: after A at col1, there are dots col2-6, then G,R,R,R,G, then dots col12-18, then A at col19. So outside channels still dots, not A. Wait but the outer border includes A at col1 and col19 (the dome). The description says dome of uniform color encloses atmosphere. So the border is A. In thunder rows, the dome color pushes outward in their rows: meaning the A color expands horizontally across the row, replacing dots? Let's see output. Output row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So the A's have filled the entire row except the green and red columns remain same. So the dome color (A) has been extended across the row, replacing the dots, but not overwriting green or red. Similarly row3,4 same. Row5 (calm row) output: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So calm rows become all dots (clear sky) except green columns remain. So the dome color disappears from calm rows (they become black). So rule: For each row, if there is any red between the two green columns (i.e., thunder row), then fill all non-green, non-red cells in that row with the border color (the color of the outer border). If there is no red (i.e., calm row), then set all non-green cells to black (dot). Also keep green columns unchanged. Also keep red unchanged. Also the outer border rows (first and last) become all dots? In output row1: all dots. Row19: all dots. Indeed they become dots (clear sky). So border color removed entirely. Thus transformation: Remove outer border (set to dot). ... [11919 chars truncated]
"The facade is stripped away and the load-bearing columns extend floor to ceiling — only the floors with tenants glow with the building's old facade color, while vacant floors go dark."
120b: k=3
See: A building facade of uniform color. Two green structural columns run through the interior. Between them, occupied floors (red) alternate with vacant ones (black). The wings outside the columns are unlit.
Do: Remove the facade. Extend columns to span the full structure. Occupied floors radiate the facade color into the wings. Vacant floors remain dark.
Grid: Same grid. Columns span fully. Occupied floors: red between columns, facade-color in wings. Vacant floors: black in wings.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have a metaphor: building facade uniform color, two green columns interior, between them occupied floors (red) alternate with vacant (black). Wings outside columns are unlit. Remove facade, extend columns to span full structure. Occupied floors radiate facade color into wings. Vacant floors remain dark. Interpretation: Input grid has outer border of some color (facade). Inside there are two vertical green columns (maybe at certain columns). Between them there are rows of red (occupied) and black (vacant) alternating? Actually in examples. Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Looks like 19x19? Actually first line: A repeated 19 times. So border of A (azure). Inside there are columns of G (green) at column index? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-18, columns 0-18. Row0: all A. Row1: A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A So border A at col0 and col18. Inside, at col6 is G, then col7-9 are R R R, col10 G, rest . then border A. Rows 1-3 same pattern (R block). Row4: A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A (so G columns but no R). Row5-6 same. Row7-9 again R block. Row10-12 G columns only. Row13-15 R block. Row16-18 G columns only? Actually row16 similar to row4: G columns only. Row17-18 same. Row18 border A. So pattern: two vertical green columns at col6 and col10 spanning entire interior (except border). Between them, there are rows where the interior between columns (col7-9) are either R (occupied) or . (vacant). The pattern alternates: rows 1-3 have R, rows4-6 have ., rows7-9 have R, rows10-12 ., rows13-15 R, rows16-18 . So alternating blocks of 3 rows each. Now output: The border A removed? In output, border rows become . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . (first row). So top border becomes . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . (i.e., border A replaced with . except the green columns remain). Similarly bottom border row becomes same. Rows that were originally border A become rows of . except green columns remain. Rows that were originally interior rows become either all A (the facade color) except green columns and red block? Let's see row1 output: A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A So the row that originally had A border, . interior, G column, R block, G column, . interior, A border. Output: left side (col0-5) become A (facade color) instead of original A border? Actually original left border col0 is A, col1-5 were .; output col0-5 are A. So the facade color (original border color) spreads into the left wing (columns left of left green column) and right wing (columns right of right green column). The green columns stay G, the red block stays R. The right border col18 becomes A as well (instead of original A). So basically the facade color (original border color) fills the entire rows except the green columns and red block? Wait also the interior . between green columns (col7-9) are R in occupied rows, . in vacant rows. In output, for occupied rows (orig ... [12440 chars truncated]
"The fortress wall is breached, and the twin ramparts extend across the battlefield — supply lines flow outward only through trenches where soldiers are stationed, while abandoned trenches lie barren."
120b: fail
See: A fortress wall of uniform color. Two green ramparts run through the keep. Between them, manned trenches (red) and empty ones (black). Outside the ramparts, no man's land.
Do: Breach the wall. Extend the ramparts across the full field. Manned trenches push the wall's color outward along their lines. Abandoned trenches remain barren.
Grid: Same dimensions. Ramparts span fully. Manned lines: red between ramparts, wall-color outside. Empty lines: black outside ramparts.
We need to infer rule from examples. Interpretation: Input has outer border of a color (A in ex1, Y in ex2, M in ex3, B in test). Inside there are two vertical (or horizontal?) green "ramparts" (lines) that run through the keep. In examples, green lines are vertical? Let's examine ex1 input: grid 19x19? Actually 19 rows, 19 columns. Outer border A. Inside there are two vertical green columns? Let's view: In input rows, pattern: after border A, there is ". . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . .". So there is a column of G at position 6? Let's index columns 0-18. Border A at col0 and col18. At col5? Actually after A, there is space then . . . . . G ... So column 6 (0-index) is G, then columns 7-9 are R R R, column10 is G. So there are two green columns separated by three red columns. This repeats across rows, but some rows have only G at those columns and no R (empty trenches). So green columns are vertical lines (ramparts). Red are "manned trenches" between them. Black '.' are empty trenches. Goal: "Breach the wall. Extend the ramparts across the full field. Manned trenches push the wall's color outward along their lines. Abandoned trenches remain barren." Interpretation: The outer border color (wall) should be extended outward (i.e., fill area outside the green columns) but only along rows where there are red (manned) between the green columns. The red lines cause the wall color to be projected outward from the green columns outward to the border? Let's see output ex1: In rows where there were red between greens, the outer border A appears in those rows across the whole row except where green columns remain? Actually output row2 (index1) is "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So the border A now fills the left side up to column5 (where G is) and right side after column10 (where G) across entire row. So the wall color (A) has been extended outward from the green columns to fill the row, but only in rows where there were red between greens. In rows where there were only green columns and no red (i.e., empty trenches), the output row is ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . ." i.e., black (.) remains, not A. Indeed rows 1,5,6,7 etc have no red; output is black across except green columns. Thus rule: For each row, if there is at least one red cell between the two green columns (i.e., a "manned trench"), then fill the entire row (except the green columns) with the border color (the original outer color). If no red, fill with black (.)? Actually original empty cells were '.' (black). In output they become '.' (still black). So they stay unchanged. Similarly columns? In ex2, the pattern is horizontal? Let's examine ex2 input: 14x? Actually 14 rows, 19 columns? Outer border Y. Inside there is a horizontal green row at row4 (index4) full of G across columns 1-17. Then rows5-6 have pattern of R R . . R R ... etc. So green ramparts are horizontal lines? Actually there are two green rows? Let's see: row4 is all G across interior. Row7 is also all G (row7 i ... [10632 chars truncated]
"The curtain is torn down and the spotlight rails extend across the whole stage — only scenes with actors in the wings are bathed in the curtain's color, while intermissions go to blackout."
120b: fail
See: A curtain of uniform color frames the stage. Two green spotlight rails run parallel through the set. Between them, scenes with actors (red) and intermissions (black). The wings outside the rails are dark.
Do: Tear down the curtain. Extend the rails across the full stage. Actor scenes flood the wings with the curtain's color. Intermissions leave the wings in blackout.
Grid: Same dimensions. Rails span fully. Actor rows: red between rails, curtain-color in wings. Intermission rows: black in wings.
We need to understand transformation rule from examples. Interpret metaphor: curtain of uniform color frames stage (border). Two green spotlight rails run parallel through set. Between them, scenes with actors (red) and intermissions (black). Wings outside rails are dark. Goal: Tear down curtain. Extend rails across full stage. Actor scenes flood the wings with curtain's color. Intermissions leave wings in blackout. Interpretation: Input grid has border of some color (maybe A in example1, Y in example2, B in test). Inside there are two vertical green columns (rails) maybe? Let's examine example1 input. Example1 input: 19x19? Actually rows 19. Border of A (azure) around edges. Inside, there are columns of G (green) at column index? Let's map coordinates. Row2: "A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A". So after leading A, there are 5 dots, then G, then RRR, then G, then rest dots, then A. So green columns at positions 7 and 11 (1-indexed). So two vertical green rails separated by 3 columns of red (actors) between them. Dots represent black (.) intermissions? Actually black is '.' per key. So black cells are intermissions. Rows with only G columns and no red: rows 5-7 have "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A". So between rails there are black (dots). So those rows are intermission rows. Rows with red block: rows 2-4,8-10,14-16 have red block between rails. Thus pattern: rails are vertical green columns spanning many rows, but not full height: they start at row2? Actually they appear from row2 to row18? Let's see row18: "A . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . A". So rails extend all the way except maybe some rows? Actually row1 and row19 are border A. So rails go from row2 to row18 inclusive (full interior). So they already span full height? In input they already do. But metaphor says "extend rails across full stage". In output, rails become full width? Wait output shows rails become horizontal? Let's examine output example1. Output row1: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So border removed? Row1 originally A border now replaced with '.' (black). So curtain removed (border color replaced with black). Row2: "A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A". So row2 now has A's across left and right of rails, and rails G and red block unchanged. So the border color (A) now fills the wings (outside rails) for rows that were actor rows. For intermission rows (like row5) output row5: ". . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . .". So wings become black (.) for intermission rows. Thus rule: For each row, if there is any red (actor) between the two green rails, then fill the cells left of left rail and right of right rail with the original border color (curtain color). If there is no red (i.e., only black) between rails, fill wings with black (.) (i.e., keep as black). Also the border rows (top and bottom) become all black (since no red). Also the rails themselves (green columns) stay green, and red cells stay red. Also note that original border color may be ... [12551 chars truncated]
"The garden fence rots away and the trellises grow to span the whole plot — only the rows where flowers bloom get mulched in the fence's old color, while fallow rows return to bare soil."
120b: k=3
See: A garden fence of uniform color. Two green trellises run parallel. Between them, blooming rows (red) and fallow rows (black). Outside the trellises, bare soil.
Do: Remove the fence. Extend trellises across the full garden. Blooming rows spread the fence's color as mulch outside the trellises. Fallow rows stay bare.
Grid: Same dimensions. Trellises span fully. Bloom rows: red between trellises, fence-color outside. Fallow rows: black outside.
We need to infer rule from examples. Interpret metaphor: fence of uniform color (border?) Two green trellises run parallel. Between them, blooming rows (red) and fallow rows (black). Outside trellises, bare soil. Goal: Remove fence. Extend trellises across full garden. Bloom rows spread fence's color as mulch outside trellises. Fallow rows stay bare. Interpretation: Input grid has border of a color (maybe A in example1, Y in example2, M in example3, B in test). Inside there are two vertical green columns (trellises) maybe? Let's examine example1 input. Example1 input: 19x19? Actually rows 19. Border of A around edges (first and last rows all A, first and last columns all A). Inside there are vertical green columns? Let's view a few rows: Row2: A . . . . . G R R R G . . . . . . . A. So there is a G at column 7? Let's index columns 1-19. Row2: col1 A, col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 G, col8 R, col9 R, col10 R, col11 G, then rest . then col19 A. So there are two G columns at positions 7 and 11, with three R between them. That's a pattern: green trellises vertical lines at columns 7 and 11. Between them, rows of red (bloom) and rows of black (fallow) maybe? Let's see rows where between trellises there are R's: rows 2-4 have R's between G's. Row5 has G . . . G (no R). So rows 2-4 are "bloom rows" (red). Row5-7 are "fallow rows" (black). Row8-10 again bloom rows. Row11-13 fallow. Row14-16 bloom. Row17-18 fallow. So pattern: alternating blocks of 3 rows of red between G columns, then 4 rows of black? Actually count: rows 2-4 (3 rows) red; rows5-7 (3 rows) black; rows8-10 (3 rows) red; rows11-13 (3 rows) black; rows14-16 red; rows17-18 black? Wait rows17-18 are . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . (no red). That's black rows. So pattern: 3 red rows, 3 black rows, repeated, ending with black before bottom border. Now output example1: border removed? Output shows first row all . except G at columns 7 and 11? Actually output row1: . . . . . . G . . . G . . . . . . . . . So border removed (no A). The G columns now extend full height (including top and bottom rows). The red rows now have fence color (A) outside trellises (i.e., left and right of G columns). In output rows that were red in input, we see A's filling the rest of row (except G columns and red block?). Let's check output row2: A A A A A A G R R R G A A A A A A A A. Indeed left of first G (col1-6) now A, right of second G (col12-19) A. The red block remains same. So rule: For rows that originally had red between G columns, replace the background (originally .) with border color (the original border color). For rows that originally had black (.) between G columns, keep as . (black). Also extend G columns to full height (including rows that were border originally). And remove border color from outermost rows (they become .). So border color is used as filler for bloom rows. Example2: Input border color Y. Inside there are vertical green columns? Let's see row5: Y G G G ... G Y. Ac ... [11751 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains scattered cells of several colors on a black background. Exactly one color — the 'marker' color — appears precisely four times, positioned at the endpoints of a cross pattern: two cells sit on opposite edges of the same row (leftmost and rightmost columns, or near them), and two cells sit on opposite edges of the same column (topmost and bottommost rows, or near them). All other non-black cells are noise/distractors.
Do: 1. Identify the unique color that appears exactly four times in the grid. This is the marker color. 2. Among those four marker positions, find the two that share the same row — they define the 'marker row.' Find the two that share the same column — they define the 'marker column.' 3. Fill the entire marker row with the marker color (every cell in that row becomes the marker color). 4. Fill the entire marker column with the marker color (every cell in that column becomes the marker color). 5. Set all other cells in the grid to black.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly (they vary across instances). The background is black (.). The output contains exactly one fully filled row and one fully filled column of the marker color, forming a cross, with their intersection sharing the marker color. All other cells are black.
"A lighthouse sends its beams to the horizon in four directions."
120b: k=2
See: The grid is a dark ocean at night, littered with flotsam of many colors drifting aimlessly. Hidden among the debris are exactly four lighthouse keepers of the same uniform color, stationed at the far edges of the sea — two guarding opposite shores of a single shipping lane, and two watching over opposite ends of a single channel. All other colored flotsam is just wreckage to be cleared away.
Do: Find the four keepers wearing matching uniforms — they are the only color that appears exactly four times. Two keepers face each other across the same horizontal shipping lane; two face each other along the same vertical channel. When the lighthouse activates, it sends a brilliant beam of that color flooding the entire shipping lane from coast to coast, and another beam blazing the full length of the channel from shore to shore. The light obliterates everything else — all flotsam sinks into the dark water.
Grid: The ocean keeps its original dimensions. Where the shipping lane and the channel cross, the beams merge into one blazing intersection. Every cell along those two lines glows with the keepers' color. The rest of the sea returns to total darkness.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colors. The description: find color that appears exactly four times. Those four cells are at far edges: two opposite sides same row (horizontal lane) and two opposite sides same column (vertical channel). Then output grid: fill entire row (full width) and column (full height) with that color, intersect cell both. All other cells become '.' (black). In example1, which color appears exactly four times? Let's check input example1: colors present: A, B, R. Count occurrences: A appears many times? Let's count quickly: In input lines, there are many As. Not four. B appears many. R appears at positions: row4 col1? Actually row4 first cell R, and row4 last cell R. Row12 first cell R, last cell R. That's four Rs, located at far left/right edges of rows 4 and 12. They are at same rows (row4 and row12) and same columns (col1 and col20). So they form rectangle corners. Output: rows 4 and 12 become all R across entire row. Also columns 1 and 20 become all R across entire column. Indeed output shows row4 all R, row12 all R, column1 all R, column20 all R. Others '.'. Thus rule matches. Example2: Input colors: R, G, X, etc. Need color appearing exactly four times. Let's count: G appears many? In input, there are G at (row1 col6?), Actually row1: ". . . . . R R . . . . G . . . . . R . . . ." So G appears at column12 row1. Row9: "G . . X X . R X . . . . . . . . . . . . R G" includes G at col1 and col22? Wait width maybe 22? Let's count. Row9 has G at start and at end. Row11: ". . R . . . . . X . . G . . . . . X . X . ." includes G at column12. So total G count: row1 col12, row9 col1, row9 col22, row11 col12 = 4. They are at far edges? Row9 col1 is left edge, row9 col22 is right edge (same row). Row1 col12 is top edge? Not top edge (row1 is top row). Column12 is not edge column (since width maybe 22). Row11 col12 is bottom? Row11 is not bottom row (there are 11 rows). So not edges. But description says keepers at far edges of sea — two guarding opposite shores of a single shipping lane (horizontal), and two watching opposite ends of a single channel (vertical). In example2, the four G's are at positions: (row1, col12) top edge, (row9, col1) left edge, (row9, col22) right edge, (row11, col12) bottom edge. So they form a cross: same column (col12) top and bottom edges, same row (row9) left and right edges. Indeed they are at far edges of grid: top row, bottom row, leftmost column, rightmost column. So they define a horizontal lane at row9 (full row) and vertical channel at column12 (full column). Output shows column12 all G, row9 all G. Indeed output grid: column12 (index?) all G, row9 all G. Yes. Thus rule: find color that appears exactly four times. Those four cells will be at the four extreme positions: two share same row (leftmost and rightmost columns), two share same column (topmost and bottommost rows). Then output: fill entire row (the row of the two cells) and column (the column of the other tw ... [6112 chars truncated]
"A cell's chromosomes align at the metaphase plate, and the spindle fibers reach out to opposite poles — when division begins, the fibers extend fully, tracing the axes of separation while all other organelles dissolve."
120b: fail
See: A culture dish teeming with scattered cellular debris of various types. One rare protein appears at exactly four anchor points, bracing against the membrane walls.
Do: Identify the rare protein. Let its anchors define the axes of cell division. The spindle fibers extend completely along both axes, consuming everything else into clear cytoplasm.
Grid: Output matches input dimensions. Two full lines of the anchor color form a cross. All other cells become black.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 13 rows? Let's count. Example 1 input appears 13 rows (since output also 13 rows). Output shows rows with R across full rows at row 4 and row 12 (0-index?). Actually output rows: row1 all .; row2 all .; row3 all .; row4 all R; row5 .; row6 .; row7 .; row8 .; row9 .; row10 .; row11 .; row12 all R; row13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (all .). So two full rows of R (the anchor color). In input, there are R letters at corners? Let's examine input: Row4: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" So R at first and last column. Row12: "R . . . . . . . A . . B . . . . . . . R". So also R at first and last column. Also there are other R? Not elsewhere. So rare protein appears at exactly four anchor points, bracing against the membrane walls. That suggests there are exactly four cells of a particular color that are at the extreme positions (topmost, bottommost, leftmost, rightmost?) Actually anchor points likely are the four corners? In example, R appears at leftmost column row4 and row12, and rightmost column same rows. So they form a rectangle: two rows (row4 and row12) each have R at both ends. So four anchor points: (row4,col1), (row4,col20), (row12,col1), (row12,col20). Those define axes: horizontal axis = row4 and row12? vertical axis = col1 and col20? The rule: produce cross lines (full rows and columns) of that anchor color across entire grid. In output, we see full rows of R at row4 and row12 (horizontal lines). Also full columns? Wait output shows only rows of R, not columns. Let's check column 1 and column 20: In output, column 1 has R at rows4 and12 only? Actually output row4 is all R, so column1 row4 is R. Row12 also all R. Other rows column1 are '.' (since rows other than 4 and12 are all .). So columns are not filled. So cross is only two full lines (rows) not columns. But description says "Two full lines of the anchor color form a cross." That would be one horizontal and one vertical line intersecting at center, forming a cross. However output shows two horizontal lines, not a cross. Maybe because the anchor points are aligned horizontally (same row) and vertically (same column) but they are at four corners of a rectangle, so the axes are the rows and columns that pass through them: the two rows (row4 and row12) and two columns (col1 and col20). But output only shows rows, not columns. Wait maybe the grid width is 20 columns. The output rows are all R across entire width, but columns are also all R? Actually if we have full rows of R, that already includes columns being R at those rows, but not full columns. The description "Two full lines of the anchor color form a cross" could mean two lines (one horizontal, one vertical) that intersect, but in this case we have two horizontal lines, not a cross. Could be that the anchor points are aligned such that the two lines are the rows (since the anchor points share same columns? Let's think: anchor points are at (row4,col1), (row4,col20), ( ... [10961 chars truncated]
"The night sky is cluttered with stars and nebulae of many colors, but four pulsars of the same rare wavelength sit at the cardinal extremes of a galactic plane — when they align, their beams trace a full meridian and a full parallel across the sky, bleaching all other light."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A starfield with scattered colored objects. Four pulsars of one rare color occupy extreme positions, paired along one declination and one right ascension.
Do: Identify the rare pulsars. Their beams extend across the full row and column they define. All other celestial objects go dark.
Grid: Two full beams of the pulsar color form a cross on a black sky.
"Flotsam of many colors drifts across the sea, but four identical buoys of a rare paint mark the edges of a shipping channel — the harbormaster clears the waters and paints navigation lanes connecting each pair of buoys, one running port-to-starboard and one bow-to-stern."
120b: fail
See: An ocean surface littered with colored debris. Four buoys of one rare color sit at peripheral positions, paired along a row and a column.
Do: Find the rare buoys. Paint full navigation lanes along their shared row and column. Clear all other debris.
Grid: Two painted lanes of the buoy color form a cross on clear water.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 13 rows? Let's count. Example 1 input appears 13 rows (0-12). Output also 13 rows. In input, there are rare color buoys? Colors: A azure appears few times. Also R red appears at row3 col0 and row11 col0 and row3 col? Actually row3 has R at start and end? Let's parse. Example1 Input grid (13x20?). Let's note positions of R: row3 col0 and col? row3 line: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" So R at col0 and col19. Row11 similar: "R . . . . . . . A . . B . . . . . . . R". So R at col0 and col19 again. So four R's at peripheral positions: corners? Actually at leftmost column rows 3 and 11, and rightmost column same rows. That's four buoys of rare color (R). They are paired along a row (row3) and a column (col0 and col19?). Wait row3 has two R's at both ends, same row. Column0 has two R's at rows3 and11. Column19 also has two R's. But description says four buoys of one rare color sit at peripheral positions, paired along a row and a column. So they form a rectangle corners? In example, they are at (3,0), (3,19), (11,0), (11,19). That's a rectangle corners. The rule: find rare color (R) that appears exactly four times at periphery (edges). Then paint full navigation lanes along their shared row and column: i.e., fill entire row(s) and column(s) that contain these buoys with that color, forming a cross? In output, we see rows 3 and 11 filled entirely with R across all columns. Also columns 0 and 19 filled with R across all rows? Let's check output: Row3 is all R. Row11 all R. Column0: rows all? Output shows column0 has R at rows0? Actually output row0 col0 is '.'? Wait output row0 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So column0 not filled. But row3 and row11 are filled. Column0 not filled except rows3 and11? Let's examine output row0: all '.'; row1 all '.'; row2 all '.'; row3 all R; row4 all '.'; row5 '.'; row6 '.'; row7 '.'; row8 '.'; row9 '.'; row10 '.'; row11 all R; row12 '.'. Thus only rows 3 and 11 are filled, not columns. So "paint full navigation lanes along their shared row and column" maybe means fill the rows that contain the buoys (the two rows) but not columns? But description says cross. However output shows only horizontal lines, not vertical. Wait maybe because the buoys are at peripheral positions along a row and a column: they share a row (top pair) and share a column (left pair). Actually there are two rows (row3 and row11) each have two buoys at ends. There are two columns (col0 and col19) each have two buoys. The rule might be: fill the rows that have the rare color buoys, but not columns. But why not columns? Maybe because the rare color appears also at column ends but they are already covered by rows? In output, column0 and column19 remain '.' except at rows3 and11 where they are R due to row fill. So not cross. Let's double-check if any column filled in other examples? Only one example given. So rule ambiguous. Maybe the rule: Identify the rare color that appears e ... [9486 chars truncated]
"A circuit board is scattered with components of various colors, but four identical resistors of a rare band code sit at the outer edges of the board — when power flows, current traces two complete bus lines along the row and column the resistors define, and all other components go dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cluttered PCB with multicolored components. Four resistors of one rare color mark peripheral positions, paired along one trace row and one trace column.
Do: Identify the rare resistors. Energize full bus lines along their shared row and column. Power down all other components.
Grid: Two energized bus lines of the resistor color form a cross on a dark board.
"The gods scatter tokens of many colors across the mortal plane as distractions, but four identical runes of a sacred color are planted at the outermost reaches — when the prophecy activates, divine fire races along the ley lines connecting the paired runes, burning away all else."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A mortal plane littered with colorful divine tokens. Four sacred runes of one rare color sit at extreme positions, paired along a row and a column.
Do: Find the sacred runes. Let divine fire trace the full row and column they define. Burn away all other tokens.
Grid: Two ley lines of the sacred color form a cross on a cleansed plane.
"Dancers in colorful costumes mill about the floor, but four performers in a rare matching outfit stand at the far edges of the ballroom — when the music swells, they glide inward, leaving ribbons of their color along one full rank and one full file, while all others exit the floor."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dance floor crowded with performers in varied colors. Four dancers in one rare costume stand at boundary positions, paired by row and by column.
Do: Identify the rare costume. Trail ribbons of its color across the full row and column the paired dancers define. Clear all other dancers.
Grid: Two ribbons of the costume color form a cross on an empty floor.
"The earth's surface is scattered with mineral deposits of many colors, but four identical crystals of a rare ore sit at the tectonic boundaries — when the plates shift, magma intrudes along the fault lines connecting the crystal pairs, one running east-west and one north-south, melting away all surface deposits."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A geological survey with scattered colored minerals. Four crystals of one rare mineral sit at extreme positions, paired along a row and a column.
Do: Find the rare crystals. Magma fills the full fault lines along their shared row and column with the crystal's color. All other deposits erode away.
Grid: Two magma-filled fault lines of the crystal color form a cross on bare rock.
"A master chef tastes the chaotic stew and detects one spice used sparingly at four cardinal points of the pot — she draws her knife through the broth in a cross, and everywhere the blade passes, only that spice remains."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A pot full of scattered ingredients of many colors. One seasoning appears exactly four times, placed at the far edges of the pot in a cross-like arrangement.
Do: Find the rare seasoning. Trace lines connecting its paired positions — one horizontal, one vertical. Fill those lines entirely with the seasoning and discard everything else from the pot.
Grid: The pot (grid) retains only two full lines of the rare seasoning forming a cross on a clean background.
"An orchestra warms up in cacophony, but four tuning forks hidden at the edges of the concert hall resonate at the same pitch — when the conductor raises the baton, silence falls and only two sustaining tones ring out, one sweeping across the rows and one down the aisles."
120b: k=2
See: A noisy score with scattered notes of many timbres. One rare timbre sounds from exactly four positions near the boundaries, paired across a row and a column.
Do: Find the rare timbre. Sustain it across the full row and full column defined by its paired positions. Silence all other notes.
Grid: A silent grid with one complete horizontal line and one complete vertical line of the rare timbre intersecting in a cross.
We need to infer rule from examples. Example1: Input grid 13 rows? Let's count. Input shows 13 rows (0-12). Output also 13 rows. In input, there are many colors: A, B, R. The description: rare timbre appears exactly four positions near boundaries, paired across a row and a column. In example1, rare timbre likely 'R' (red) appears at four positions near boundaries: Let's locate R in input. Row3 (0-index?) Actually row index starting 0: Row0: ... A ... Row1: ... A ... B ... Row2: ... B ... B ... Row3: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" So R at column0 and column? at end column? That's two R's on same row at boundaries. Row5? Row... Row11: "R . . . . . . . A . . B . . . . . . . R" again R at start and end. Row? also maybe other rows have R at boundaries? Row? Row? Actually row0 no R. Row2 none. Row4 none. Row6 none. Row8 none. Row9 none. Row10 none. Row12: "A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . ." no R. So there are exactly four R's: at (row3, col0), (row3, col19), (row11, col0), (row11, col19). That's four positions near boundaries, paired across a row (row3) and a column (col0 and col19). So rare timbre = R. Output: all R's fill entire rows 3 and 11 (full horizontal lines) and columns 0 and 19 (full vertical lines). Indeed output shows row3 all R, row11 all R, column0 all R, column19 all R. Intersection cross forms full cross. All other cells become '.' (black). Yes. Example2: Input grid 11 rows? Let's count. Input lines show 11 rows. Colors: R, G, X, etc. Rare timbre appears exactly four positions near boundaries, paired across a row and a column. Let's find which color appears exactly four times near boundaries. Look at input: I see many G's maybe? Let's locate G: Row0: "... G ..." at column? Row0: ". . . . . R R . . . . G . . . . . R . . . ." So G at column? after some spaces. Row1: "R . . . . . R . . . . . . R . . . . . . . ." No G. Row2: ". . . . . . X R . X R . X . . . . . R . . ." No G. Row3: ". . . . X X . . . . . . . . R . . . . . R ." No G. Row4: "X . . R . R . . . . . . . . R . . . . . . ." No G. Row5: ". . . R . . . R . . R . . . . . . . R . X ." No G. Row6: ". . R . . . . . . X X . . X . . . . . R X ." No G. Row7: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . . . R . . ." No G. Row8: "G . . X X . R X . . . . . . . . . . . . R G" G at start column0 and at end column? last column maybe G. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . R . R X . X . . . R . . ." No G. Row10: ". . R . . . . . X . . G . . . . . X . X . ." G at column? near end. So G appears at positions: (0,??), (8,0), (8,?, maybe last), (10,??). Let's count: Row0 column? Let's index columns 0-? length maybe 23? Not needed. G appears at row0 col? maybe 11? Row8 col0 and col? maybe 22? Row10 col? maybe 10? That's four G's. Are they near boundaries? Row0 not near boundary (top row) but near top boundary yes. Row8 col0 left boundary, row8 col22 right boundary, row10 maybe near bottom? Not exactly. But they are paired across a row and column: maybe they share same row (row8) and same column (col??). ... [7921 chars truncated]
"During a chaotic scrimmage, four teammates wearing the same rare jersey color stand at the far sidelines and endlines — the referee blows the whistle and chalk lines extend between them, marking the field while all other players leave the pitch."
120b: k=3
See: A playing field cluttered with athletes in various jerseys. One jersey color appears exactly four times, at boundary-like positions hinting at paired alignments.
Do: Identify the rare jersey. Draw the sideline and endline connecting its paired wearers across the full width and height. Clear the field of all other players.
Grid: Two complete lines of the rare jersey color forming a cross on an empty field.
We need to infer rule. From description: "One jersey color appears exactly four times, at boundary-like positions hinting at paired alignments. Identify the rare jersey. Draw the sideline and endline connecting its paired wearers across the full width and height. Clear the field of all other players. Grid details: Two complete lines of the rare jersey color forming a cross on an empty field." Interpretation: In each input, there is a color that appears exactly four times, positioned at corners of a rectangle? The rule draws a full horizontal line across the row of those positions and a full vertical line across the column, forming a cross (full row and column) of that color, and clears everything else (set to .). Output shows only that cross. Check Example1: Input colors: many letters A, B, R. Which appears exactly four times? Let's count R appears many times? In input, R appears at (row4 col1), (row4 col20), (row12 col1), (row12 col20). That's four Rs at corners of rectangle (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). Indeed output shows full rows of R at rows 4 and 12 (full width) and also columns? Wait output shows rows 4 and 12 filled with R across all columns. Also column? Actually output shows column? Let's see output grid: rows 4 and 12 are all R. No other rows have R. No vertical line? The description says cross: both full row and column. But output only has rows. Let's examine: In output, row4: all R. Row12: all R. No column of R elsewhere. So maybe the rule is: draw lines connecting the paired wearers across full width (horizontal) and height (vertical) but only if they share same row or column? Wait the four Rs are at (4,1), (4,20), (12,1), (12,20). So they form rectangle corners. The "sideline and endline connecting its paired wearers across the full width and height" could mean draw horizontal lines across rows of the top pair (row4) and bottom pair (row12) (full width). And vertical lines across columns of left pair (col1) and right pair (col20) (full height). But output does not have vertical lines at col1 and col20. Let's check output column1: row1 '.' row2 '.' ... row4 R (since row4 all R) row5 '.' ... row12 R (row12 all R) others '.' So column1 has R only at rows4 and12, not full column. So vertical lines not drawn. So maybe they only draw the horizontal lines (sideline) connecting paired wearers across full width, and the vertical lines are not drawn because they would overlap? But description says "sideline and endline connecting its paired wearers across the full width and height." Could be they draw both, but overlapping with existing rows? Wait vertical lines would be at columns where the rare color appears (col1 and col20). But those columns already have Rs at rows4 and12; drawing full column would add Rs at other rows. Output does not have them. So maybe they only draw the line that is longer? Not. Check Example2: Input includes many colors; rare color appears exactly four times? Let's find which color appears ex ... [12053 chars truncated]
"Storm debris litters the landscape in random colors, but four identical weather vanes at the far edges of the map point inward — when the front passes, the wind carves two clean corridors through the wreckage, one east-west and one north-south."
120b: k=1
See: A weather map scattered with colored storm debris. Four identical vanes of a rare hue sit at extreme positions, two sharing a latitude and two sharing a longitude.
Do: Find the rare vanes. The wind scours clean corridors along their shared latitude and longitude, painting those corridors entirely in the vane's color. All debris elsewhere vanishes.
Grid: Two full-length corridors of the vane color form a cross on a clear map.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 13 rows? Let's count. Example 1 input lines: appears 13 rows (0-12). Output also 13 rows. In input, there are colored cells: A, B, R. The description: "Four identical vanes of a rare hue sit at extreme positions, two sharing a latitude and two sharing a longitude." Means there are four cells of a particular color located at extreme positions (corners?) sharing rows/columns. In example, rare hue likely 'R' (red) appears at four corners? Let's see input: Row0 has A at column5? Row3 has R at col0 and col? Actually row3: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R" So R at leftmost and rightmost of row3. Row11: "R . . . . . . . A . . B . . . . . . . R" also R at both ends. So four Rs at extreme positions? They are at rows 3 and 11, columns 0 and 19 (assuming 20 columns). So they share latitude (same row) pair: rows 3 and 11 each have two Rs at extremes. They also share longitude (same column) pair: columns 0 and 19 each have Rs at rows 3 and 11. So indeed four Rs at corners of a rectangle (not full grid corners). The rule: "Find the rare vanes. The wind scours clean corridors along their shared latitude and longitude, painting those corridors entirely in the vane's color. All debris elsewhere vanishes." So we fill entire rows (the two rows) and columns (the two columns) with the vane color (R). All other cells become '.' (black). Output shows rows 3 and 11 filled with R across all columns. Also columns 0 and 19 filled with R across all rows (including rows 3 and 11 already R). Indeed output shows column 0 and 19 all R. Let's verify: Output row0: all '.' (since column0? Wait row0 column0 is '.' in output? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So column0 is '.' not R. Hmm but rule says columns 0 and 19 should be R. Let's check output row3: "R R R ...". Row0 column0 is '.' So maybe columns are not filled, only rows? Wait output row0 column0 '.' but column0 should be R if column corridor painted. Let's examine output row1 column0 '.' etc. So only rows 3 and 11 are filled with R, not columns. But description says cross of two full-length corridors. In output we see only horizontal lines, not vertical. However maybe the grid is 13 rows x 20 columns, and the Rs at extremes are at same column index? Let's check positions: Row3 column0 and column? Actually row3 string: "R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R". So Rs at col0 and col19. Row11 similar. So columns 0 and 19 each have Rs at rows 3 and 11 only, not at other rows. So they are not "full-length corridors". The rule says wind scours clean corridors along their shared latitude and longitude, painting those corridors entirely in the vane's color. That would mean fill entire rows (latitudes) and columns (longitudes) that are shared by the vanes. The shared latitude: rows 3 and 11 (since each pair of vanes share a latitude). The shared longitude: columns 0 and 19. So we should fill rows 3 and 11 fully, and columns 0 and 19 fully. But out ... [9465 chars truncated]
"A demolition crew surveys a cluttered building site — four identical cornerstones of a rare marble are embedded at the extremes of a hidden foundation. The crew clears everything and lays two load-bearing walls along the axes the cornerstones define."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A construction site strewn with materials of many colors. One rare stone appears four times at peripheral positions, hinting at structural axes.
Do: Locate the rare cornerstones. Erect continuous walls along the row and column they define. Demolish all other materials.
Grid: Two solid walls of the rare stone color intersect as a cross on a cleared site.
"Scouts scattered across a battlefield carry flags of many colors, but four sentinels bearing the same rare banner hold positions at the outermost edges — the general orders a barricade built along both lines connecting the sentinel pairs, and all other troops withdraw."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A battlefield with scattered soldiers bearing various colors. One banner color marks exactly four sentinels at boundary positions, paired along one row and one column.
Do: Identify the sentinel banner. Fortify the entire row and column connecting the paired sentinels with that banner's color. Withdraw all other forces.
Grid: Two complete fortification lines of the banner color form a cross on an empty field.
"The stage is cluttered with props and extras in costume — four identical spotlights of a rare gel color are mounted at the edges of the theater, two flanking the same row of seats and two flanking the same aisle. When the house lights drop, only two beams remain: one sweeping across the row and one down the aisle."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stage filled with colorful distractions. Four rare-colored spotlights sit at extreme positions, defining one row and one column by their pairings.
Do: Find the rare spotlight color. Illuminate the entire row and column it defines. Blackout everything else.
Grid: Two beams of the spotlight color form a cross on a dark stage.
"A neglected garden is overrun with weeds of every hue, but four identical stakes of a rare wood mark the edges of a hidden irrigation cross — the gardener clears the plot, and water flows along both trenches the stakes define, staining the soil in the wood's color."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An overgrown garden with scattered colored plants. Four stakes of one rare color sit at peripheral positions, two sharing a row and two sharing a column.
Do: Find the rare stakes. Flood their row and column with water of the stake's color. Uproot everything else.
Grid: Two irrigation lines of the stake color form a cross on bare soil.
See: The input is a 3x3 grid filled with colored cells. The cells may all be the same color, or they may contain two or three distinct colors arranged in any pattern.
Do: Count the number of distinct colors present in the input grid. Create a 3x3 output grid filled with black (.). Then place exactly three grey (X) cells according to the count: If there is 1 distinct color, place X across the entire top row (positions (0,0), (0,1), (0,2)) forming a horizontal line. If there are 2 distinct colors, place X along the main diagonal (positions (0,0), (1,1), (2,2)) running from top-left to bottom-right. If there are 3 distinct colors, place X along the anti-diagonal (positions (0,2), (1,1), (2,0)) running from top-right to bottom-left.
Grid: Both input and output are 3x3 grids. The output grid has a black (.) background with exactly three grey (X) cells arranged in one of three fixed patterns depending on the color count in the input.
"A conductor reads the harmony of an orchestra to choose the curtain call formation."
120b: k=2
See: A small stage is filled with performers dressed in colored costumes. Sometimes the entire ensemble wears matching outfits; other times, factions in different colors share the stage.
Do: After the performance, the curtain falls and the stage goes dark. A spotlight operator counts how many distinct factions performed. The fewer the factions, the more unified the bow — a single troupe lines up shoulder to shoulder across the front of the stage. A duo takes a bow along the grand staircase from balcony to pit. A trio crosses paths, saluting from opposite wings through center stage.
Grid: The dark stage is the same size as the original. Exactly three spotlights (grey) illuminate the bowing positions against the blackout, their arrangement a silent review of the evening's diversity.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid of colors. Output contains X (grey) and . (black) only? In examples output only X and . . Yes. Goal: count distinct colors (factions) in input? Then place exactly three X's (spotlights) in output arrangement based on number of distinct colors? Let's examine. Example1 input: all G (green) only one color. Output: X X X . . . . . . So three X's in first row, rest . . . So arrangement maybe a line across front (top row) when only one faction? "single troupe lines up shoulder to shoulder across the front of the stage." That matches: a single line of X across front (top row). So three X's across top row. Example2 input: colors: G, Y, R. Let's list distinct: G, Y, R = 3 colors. Output: . . X . X . X . . That's a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Actually positions: (row1,col3), (row2,col2), (row3,col1). That's a diagonal descending leftwards (anti-diagonal). That's three X's forming a line from top right to bottom left. That could represent "a duo takes a bow along the grand staircase from balcony to pit" maybe two? Not sure. But we have three X's always exactly three. Arrangement varies based on number of distinct colors? Example1 (1 distinct) gave top row. Example2 (3 distinct) gave anti-diagonal. Need mapping for 2 distinct maybe? Not given. For test input we have colors: Y, R, G. That's also three distinct colors (Y,R,G). Same as example2. So output likely same pattern: anti-diagonal. But need verify if arrangement depends on something else like which colors present? Example2 input grid: G G G Y R R Y Y R Let's compute something: maybe count of each color? Not needed. Maybe rule: place X's at positions of the three most frequent colors? Not. But output pattern independent of input arrangement? Example1 all same color gave top row. Example2 mixed gave anti-diagonal. Could be based on number of distinct colors: 1 -> top row, 2 -> middle column? 3 -> anti-diagonal? Need to guess for 3 distinct we output anti-diagonal. Thus test input also 3 distinct, output same anti-diagonal. Let's produce grid same size as input (3x3). So output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . Same as example2. Let's answer.
"A cell biologist examines a tissue sample under the microscope. The diversity of cell types determines whether the organism's skeleton crystallizes as a flat plate, a right-handed helix, or a left-handed helix."
120b: k=2
See: A tissue sample of colored cells fills a petri dish.
Do: Assess the biodiversity of the sample. The skeleton that forms across the dark medium reflects the complexity of life found within.
Grid: The petri dish and the skeletal imprint are both 3x3. The imprint is dark except for three calcified grey nodes arranged in a pattern that echoes the richness of the sample.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R etc. Output uses '.' (black) and 'X' (grey). So output seems to mark certain positions with X based on something about input. Example1: Input all G (green). Output: first row all X, other rows all . . . So pattern: top row X, rest . . . So maybe rule: find the "skeleton" of something: three grey nodes arranged in a pattern that echoes richness. In example1, maybe the three X's are placed where there is a "max" or something? But only three X's appear (top row). That's three nodes. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . So X's form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right (anti-diagonal). That's three X's again. So rule: place X's at positions of something like "most frequent color"? Let's analyze. Example1: all G, so any rule would be symmetric; they chose top row. Why top row? Maybe they choose the "skeleton" shape based on distribution of colors: maybe they compute convex hull of a particular color? But only one color present. Example2: Input has colors G, Y, R. Output X's at positions (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) (using 1-index). That's anti-diagonal. What property of those cells? Let's list input values at those positions: (1,3): G (2,2): R (3,1): Y So they are different colors. Maybe they correspond to the three most common colors? Count frequencies: G appears 3 (row1 all G). Y appears 3? Let's count: Y at (2,1), (3,1), (3,2) = 3. R appears 3? R at (2,2),(2,3),(3,3) = 3. So all three colors appear equally (3 each). So maybe X's placed at positions of each of the three colors? But which positions? They chose one of each color maybe in some order: top-right G, center R, bottom-left Y. That seems like they placed X at a representative cell for each color, maybe the "first occurrence" scanning order? Let's see scanning order row-major: positions: (1,1) G, (1,2) G, (1,3) G, (2,1) Y, (2,2) R, (2,3) R, (3,1) Y, (3,2) Y, (3,3) R. If we take first occurrence of each distinct color: G first at (1,1); Y first at (2,1); R first at (2,2). That would be positions (1,1), (2,1), (2,2) not matching. Maybe they take the "centroid" of each color region? For uniform distribution maybe centroid of G region is top row center? Not. Alternatively maybe rule: find three cells that form a line (maybe diagonal) that contains one of each color? In example2, anti-diagonal contains G,R,Y each distinct. In example1, all cells are G, but they still need three nodes; they placed them in top row (horizontal line). That line contains three G (same). So maybe rule: find a line (row, column, or diagonal) that contains the most "biodiversity" (i.e., number of distinct colors). Choose line with maximum distinct colors. Then mark those three cells with X. In example2, anti-diagonal has three distinct colors (G,R,Y) which is max possible (3). Any row/col? Row1 has all G (1 distinct). Row2 has Y,R,R (2 distinct). Row3 has Y,Y,R (2). Columns: col1 ... [3392 chars truncated]
"An astronomer catalogs the spectral classes of stars in a cluster. A uniform cluster emits radiation in a flat band across the observatory sensor; binary systems cast a diagonal streak; triple-star systems refract light along the opposing diagonal."
120b: k=5
See: A 3x3 star cluster with colored spectral signatures.
Do: Classify the spectral diversity and record the grey emission pattern on the dark sensor array.
Grid: The sensor array is 3x3 black with three grey readings.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3x3 input, output also 3x3 with '.' black and 'X' grey only? In examples outputs only '.' and 'X'. So rule maps certain positions to X based on input colors. Example1: Input all G. Output first row all X, rest '.'. So when all same color (green) output X in top row. Example3: Input all Y. Output same as example1: top row X, rest '.'. Thus uniform grid leads to X across top row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: . . X . X . X . . Let's map coordinates (r,c) 1-index. Output X positions: (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). That's a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left (anti-diagonal). So pattern maybe based on something like "spectral diversity" classification? Let's see input colors: maybe we need to find the most frequent color? Or something about positions of a particular color. In example2, what is special? Let's list colors: G appears 3 times (row1). Y appears 3 times (row2 col1, row3 col1-2). R appears 3 times (row2 col2-3, row3 col3). So three colors each 3 times. So equal counts. Output is anti-diagonal X. Example4 input: Row1 Y Y Y Row2 Y Y Y Row3 G G G So colors: Y 6, G 3. Output: X . . . X . . . X (main diagonal from top-left to bottom-right). So X on main diagonal. Example5 input: Row1 R R R Row2 G R G Row3 G G G Counts: R? Row1 3, Row2 col2 R => total 4. G: Row2 col1,3 and row3 three => total 5. So G most frequent (5). Output same as example4: main diagonal. So rule maybe: If there is a majority color (most frequent) then place X on main diagonal; else if tie among colors (maybe three colors equal) then place X on anti-diagonal; else if uniform (single color) also top row? Wait uniform case gave top row X, not diagonal. Uniform also is a tie? Actually only one color present, counts: that color 9, others 0. That's a majority, but output is top row, not diagonal. So need nuance. Maybe rule based on number of distinct colors: 1 distinct => top row; 2 distinct => main diagonal? Let's test: Example4 has 2 colors (Y and G) output main diagonal. Example5 also 2 colors (R and G) output main diagonal. Example2 has 3 colors (G,Y,R) output anti-diagonal. Example1 and 3 have 1 color => top row. Thus rule: Determine number of distinct colors present in input grid. If 1 distinct -> fill top row with X (others .). If 2 distinct -> fill main diagonal with X. If 3 distinct -> fill anti-diagonal with X. What about 4+? Not in examples. Test input: Y Y Y R G R G R G Let's count distinct colors: Y, R, G present. That's 3 distinct colors. So output should be anti-diagonal X pattern (like example2). So X at positions (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). All other cells '.'. Thus output grid: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . Check if any other nuance like order of colors? Not needed. Thus answer.
"A navigator reads the colors of the ocean currents on the chart. Uniform waters send the wake straight across the bow; two currents meeting carve a diagonal course to starboard; where three currents converge, the ship tacks hard to port along the counter-diagonal."
120b: k=4
See: A 3x3 ocean chart with colored current zones.
Do: Read the currents and plot three grey waypoints on the dark nautical chart.
Grid: The chart is 3x3 black with three grey waypoints marking the vessel's course.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R etc. Output uses only X (grey) and . (black). So transformation maps certain positions to X based on input pattern. Example1: Input all G. Output first row all X, other rows all . . . So X's in row0 all columns. So maybe X placed where there is a "majority" of a certain color? Not. Example3: Input all Y. Output same as example1: first row X X X, rest . . . So same output for all G and all Y. So rule not dependent on specific color but maybe on something like "top row is the 'ocean current' direction"? Let's see other examples. Example2: Input: Row0: G G G Row1: Y R R Row2: Y Y R Output: Row0: . . X Row1: . X . Row2: X . . So X's form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Actually positions: (2,0), (1,1), (0,2) - that's anti-diagonal. So X placed on anti-diagonal. Example4: Input: Y Y Y Y Y Y G G G Output: X . . . X . . . X That's main diagonal (top-left to bottom-right). So X placed on main diagonal. So rule: Determine which diagonal to fill based on something in input. Example1 and 3 (uniform color) gave X's on first row, not diagonal. Hmm maybe when all same color, fill top row. But why not diagonal? Let's examine pattern: maybe they fill the row/col/diag that has the most of a particular color? Let's compute counts. Example2 input: counts per row: Row0 GGG (all G) Row1 YRR (mix) Row2 YYR (mix) The anti-diagonal positions (0,2)=G, (1,1)=R, (2,0)=Y. Those are three different colors. Maybe rule: place X on cells where the three colors are all distinct? In example2, anti-diagonal cells are G,R,Y all distinct. Main diagonal cells are (0,0)=G, (1,1)=R, (2,2)=R (two Rs) not all distinct. So they chose anti-diagonal. Example4 input: rows: top two rows Y Y Y, bottom row G G G. Main diagonal cells: (0,0)=Y, (1,1)=Y, (2,2)=G (two Y). Not all distinct. Anti-diagonal cells: (0,2)=Y, (1,1)=Y, (2,0)=G (two Y). Both have duplicate Y. Yet they chose main diagonal. So maybe rule is choose diagonal that has the most of a particular color? Let's count colors on each diagonal. Example2: Main diag: G,R,R => two Rs, one G. Anti diag: G,R,Y => all distinct. Maybe rule: choose diagonal with all distinct colors? Example4: both diagonals have duplicate Y, but they chose main diagonal. So maybe tie-breaking rule: choose main diagonal if both not distinct? But example1/3 had uniform rows, not diagonal. Maybe rule: If any row is uniform (all same color) then fill that row with X? In example1 all rows uniform G, but they filled top row only, not all rows. Example3 all Y, same. So they choose top row when entire grid uniform. Why top row not any row? Maybe they always fill the first row (row0) when the grid is uniform (all same color). That matches both. Now test input: Y Y Y R G R G R G We need to decide which diagonal or row. First, check if any row uniform: Row0 Y Y Y uniform yes. Row1 not uniform, Row2 not uniform. So there is a uniform row (top row). In exa ... [11317 chars truncated]
"A circuit designer examines the voltage levels on an input bus. A single voltage level routes current straight across the top trace; two distinct levels activate the main diagonal path through the resistor matrix; three levels trigger the cross-diagonal failsafe."
120b: k=3
See: A 3x3 bus of colored voltage indicators.
Do: Measure the distinct signal levels and light up three grey LEDs on the dark circuit board.
Grid: The board is 3x3 black with three grey LEDs.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 grid of colors. Output also 3x3 with '.' black and 'X' grey maybe others? In examples output only '.' and 'X'. So rule maps some positions to X based on something. Example1: Input all G (green). Output first row all X, rest '.'. So when all same color, X's fill first row. Example3: Input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1: first row X, rest '.'. Thus rule likely: Identify distinct colors? "Measure the distinct signal levels and light up three grey LEDs on the dark circuit board." There are three grey LEDs. So we need to light up three X's (grey) based on something about distinct colors in input. In example1, only one distinct color (green). Output has three X's (first row). Example3 also one distinct color (yellow) -> same output. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Distinct colors present: G, Y, R => three distinct colors. Output: . . X . X . X . . Positions of X form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Output X at (0,2), (1,1), (2,0). That's anti-diagonal. So when three distinct colors, X's placed on anti-diagonal. When one distinct color, X's placed on first row (positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2)). That's also three X's. What about two distinct colors? Not given. Need to infer rule: maybe X's placed on column corresponding to something like count of each color? Or maybe based on which colors are present: order of colors maybe map to positions. Observation: In example2, the three distinct colors are G, Y, R. The anti-diagonal maybe corresponds to ordering of colors? Not sure. Maybe rule: For each distinct color, find its "signal level" (maybe numeric mapping). Then light up three LEDs corresponding to the three distinct levels sorted? But output only three X's always. Maybe rule: Identify the three most frequent colors? In example2 frequencies: G appears 3 times (row1). Y appears 4 times? Let's count: Y at (1,0), (2,0),(2,1) =3? Actually row2 col0 Y, row3 col0 Y, row3 col1 Y => 3 Y. R appears 3 times (row2 col1,2; row3 col2). So all three colors appear 3 times each. So equal frequencies. In example1, only one color appears 9 times. Output first row X. Maybe rule: If only one distinct color, fill first row. If three distinct colors, fill anti-diagonal. If two distinct colors, maybe fill first column? Need guess. Test input: Y Y Y R G R G R G Let's count distinct colors: Y, R, G => three distinct colors again. So likely output anti-diagonal X pattern same as example2. Thus output grid: Row0: . . X Row1: . X . Row2: X . . Same as example2. Check if any other nuance: maybe positions correspond to which colors are present in each row/col? In test input, first row all Y, second row R G R, third row G R G. In example2, first row all G, second row Y R R, third row Y Y R. Both have first row uniform color, second row mix, third row mix. Output anti-diagonal. Thus answer likely anti-diagonal. Provide output grid with '.' an ... [23 chars truncated]
"An oracle peers into a mosaic of colored tiles and reads the fate of nations. When the tiles speak with one voice, destiny marches in a rank. Two voices weave fate from throne to grave. Three voices unravel fate from grave to throne."
120b: k=4
See: A 3x3 mosaic of colored prophetic tiles.
Do: Divine the number of voices in the mosaic and inscribe the grey fate-marks on the dark tablet.
Grid: The tablet is 3x3 obsidian black with three grey fate-marks.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 grid of colors. Output uses only '.' (black) and 'X' (grey). So transformation maps certain cells to X based on something. Look at examples. Example1: Input all G (green). Output: first row all X, other rows all . . . So X's in top row. Example3: Input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1: top row X, rest . . . So when uniform color (all same) output X in top row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . So X's form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 1-indexed. X at (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). That's anti-diagonal. What property leads to that? Input pattern maybe counts of something? Let's examine input colors: maybe we need to find "voices" number? The description: "Divine the number of voices in the mosaic and inscribe the grey fate-marks on the dark tablet." Not helpful. Maybe rule: Determine the majority color? Or count of each color? The number of distinct colors? Example1: only G (1 distinct). Output X in top row (3 X). Example3: only Y (1 distinct). Same output. Example2: Input has G, Y, R (3 distinct). Output X's on anti-diagonal (3 X). Example4: Input: Row1: Y Y Y Row2: Y Y Y Row3: G G G Distinct colors: Y and G (2). Output: X . . . X . . . X That's main diagonal (top-left to bottom-right) with X's (3 X). Wait that's 3 X again. So number of X's always 3? All outputs have exactly three X's. Indeed each output grid has three X's placed somewhere. So rule: place three X's in positions determined by something about input colors. Example1 and 3: all same color -> X's in top row (positions (1,1),(1,2),(1,3)). That's a horizontal line. Example4: two colors (Y top rows, G bottom row) -> X's on main diagonal. Example2: three colors (G, Y, R) -> X's on anti-diagonal. Maybe mapping: number of distinct colors determines pattern orientation: 1 distinct -> top row; 2 distinct -> main diagonal; 3 distinct -> anti-diagonal. Could be. Test input: Row1: Y Y Y Row2: R G R Row3: G R G Let's count distinct colors: Y, R, G => three distinct colors. So pattern should be anti-diagonal (like example2). So X's at (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). All other cells '.'. Thus output grid: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . Check if any other nuance: maybe also need to consider which colors appear where? Example2 also had three distinct colors and anti-diagonal. Example4 had two distinct colors and main diagonal. Example1/3 had one distinct and top row. Thus answer. Let's format. ANSWER: . . X . X . X . .
"A choreographer watches the dancers' costumes swirl and decides the final pose. A troupe in uniform freezes in a chorus line across the stage; two costume groups finish in a cascading fall from corner to corner; three groups end in the mirror-image cascade."
120b: k=2
See: A 3x3 stage of dancers in colored costumes.
Do: Read the costume diversity and place the three grey spotlights for the final freeze-frame on the dark stage floor.
Grid: The floor is 3x3 black with three grey marks.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R etc. Output uses '.' (black) and 'X' (grey). So rule maps certain positions to grey spots based on input pattern. Example1: Input all G. Output: first row all X, rest '.'. So when all same color (green), grey spots fill top row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . So pattern of X's forms a diagonal from top right to bottom left (anti-diagonal). Input pattern maybe indicates something about diversity? Let's examine. Input grid: [ (0,0) G, (0,1) G, (0,2) G (1,0) Y, (1,1) R, (1,2) R (2,0) Y, (2,1) Y, (2,2) R ] We need to map to X positions: (0,2), (1,1), (2,0). That's anti-diagonal. What property of those cells? Maybe they are the most frequent color? Let's count colors: G appears 3 times (top row). Y appears 3 times (positions (1,0),(2,0),(2,1)). R appears 3 times (positions (1,1),(1,2),(2,2)). All equal frequency. So not that. Maybe rule: place X on cells that are unique in their row/column? Let's see: For each row, maybe pick the color that is different from others? Row1 all G same, no unique. Row2 has Y,R,R -> Y is unique. Row3 Y,Y,R -> R is unique. But X positions are (0,2) not in rows 2 or 3. So not. Maybe rule: find positions where the color is the minority in its column? Let's compute column wise: col0: G,Y,Y -> Y appears twice, G once. Minority G at (0,0). Not X. col1: G,R,Y -> all different. No minority. col2: G,R,R -> R appears twice, G once. Minority G at (0,2) which is X! So one X matches minority column. Also (1,1) is X, column1 had all different, maybe pick the middle? Not. Maybe rule: X marks positions that are the "center of each color's bounding box"? Let's see: For each color, compute minimal rectangle covering its occurrences. For G: positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2) -> bounding box row0 only, columns 0-2. Center maybe (0,1) not X. For Y: positions (1,0),(2,0),(2,1) -> bounding box rows1-2, cols0-1. Center maybe (1,0) or (2,0) or (1,1) etc. X includes (2,0) yes. For R: positions (1,1),(1,2),(2,2) -> bounding box rows1-2, cols1-2. Center maybe (1,2) or (2,1). X includes (1,1) not. Hmm. Maybe rule: X marks cells that are part of a "rook move" from a unique color? Not. Let's think about metaphor: "3x3 stage of dancers in colored costumes. Read the costume diversity and place the three grey spotlights for the final freeze-frame on the dark stage floor. Grid details: The floor is 3x3 black with three grey marks." Interpretation: We have three dancers (maybe three colors) and we need to place three spotlights (grey) based on diversity of costumes. So we need to identify three distinct colors present, and then place grey marks maybe at positions of those colors? Example1: only one color (green). But we still need three grey marks. They placed them on top row (maybe first row). Could be that when only one color, we place grey marks in first row (or maybe at positi ... [2247 chars truncated]
"A geologist cores a rock face and reads the mineral composition. A pure formation fractures in a clean horizontal shear; a binary composite cracks along the grain from surface to depth; a triple-mineral matrix cleaves against the grain."
120b: k=4
See: A 3x3 rock face of colored mineral deposits.
Do: Assay the mineral diversity and mark the three grey fracture points on the dark cross-section.
Grid: The cross-section is 3x3 black with three grey fracture points.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors varied. Output uses only '.' (black) and 'X' (grey). The description: "cross-section is 3x3 black with three grey fracture points." So output always has exactly three X's? Let's check. Example1 output: X X X on first row, rest '.' => three X's indeed. Example2 output: pattern: . . X . X . X . . That's three X's (positions (0,2), (1,1), (2,0)) diagonal from top-right to bottom-left. Example3 output: same as example1: first row X X X. Example4 output: X . . . X . . . X => three X's diagonal from top-left to bottom-right. So rule: given input grid, we need to place three X's in certain positions based on something about colors. Observations: Example1 input all G (green). Output X's across top row. Example3 input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1 (top row). So when uniform color (all same), output top row X's. Example4 input: top two rows Y, bottom row G. Output diagonal TL-BR. Example2 input: first row GGG, second row YRR, third row YYR. Output diagonal TR-BL. So rule maybe based on which color appears most? Let's compute counts. Example1: all G count 9. Output top row. Example3: all Y count 9. Output top row. Example4: Y count 6 (first two rows), G count 3 (bottom row). Output TL-BR diagonal. Example2: counts: G: first row 3, plus maybe others? Input: row1 G G G (3 G). row2 Y R R (0 G). row3 Y Y R (0 G). So G count =3. Y count = row2 first Y (1) + row3 first two Y (2) =3. R count = row2 two R + row3 one R =3. So all three colors equal 3 each. Output diagonal TR-BL. So maybe rule: Identify the color that is "different" or minority? Not. Let's think about mapping: The three X's correspond to positions of something like the "most frequent color"? Example1: all G, but X's across top row (positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2)). That's entire first row. Could be that the most frequent color's row index? Not. Maybe rule: For each column, find the color that is most common in that column, and mark X in row where that color appears? Not. Let's examine Example4: Input rows: Y Y Y / Y Y Y / G G G. Output X's at (0,0),(1,1),(2,2). That's diagonal TL-BR. How could that be derived? Perhaps we look at columns: column0 has Y,Y,G. Majority Y (2). The minority G at row2 column0. That position is (2,0) but output X at (2,2) not match. Maybe we consider positions of a particular color, like the color that appears exactly three times? In Example4, G appears 3 times (bottom row). Their positions are (2,0),(2,1),(2,2). Output X's are (0,0),(1,1),(2,2). That's not same. Example2: each color appears 3 times. Positions of G: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2). Output X's are (0,2),(1,1),(2,0). That's like reverse diagonal of G positions? G positions are top row; output includes top-right (0,2) which is part of G row, plus others. Maybe rule: Determine the "rock face" (input) and "fracture points" are three grey points placed at positions that correspond to something like the three colors' ce ... [1352 chars truncated]
"A chef tastes a stew and judges its complexity. A simple broth gets a flat garnish across the rim; a two-flavor blend earns a cascading drizzle corner to corner; a three-spice medley receives a contrary slash."
120b: k=2
See: A pot of ingredients fills the kitchen counter, each ingredient a different hue.
Do: Taste the stew and judge its complexity. Plate the grey sauce on a dark dish in the pattern that honors the depth of flavor.
Grid: Both the pot and the plate are 3x3. The plate is clean black except for three drops of grey sauce whose arrangement speaks to the palate.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R etc. Output uses '.' (black) and X (grey). So output is a pattern of grey (X) on black background. Goal: "plate is clean black except for three drops of grey sauce whose arrangement speaks to the palate." So output always has exactly three X's? Example1 output: first row all X, others . . . That's three X's? Actually first row has three X's, that's three X's total. Example2 output: pattern: positions (0,2), (1,1), (2,0) - that's three X's as well (diagonal from top right to bottom left). So exactly three X's placed according to something derived from input. We need to map input to positions of X. Example1 input: all G (green). Output: X's in top row (row0 all columns). So maybe rule: find the row/col with most of a certain color? Or maybe based on counts of colors? Let's analyze. Input1: all same color G. Output: X's fill the row that corresponds to that color? But we only have one row of X's across entire row. Could be that we take the positions of the most frequent color? But all cells are G, so all positions are that color, not just top row. Maybe we consider each color corresponds to a direction? Or we treat the 3x3 as a "pot" and we need to "taste" complexity: maybe we compute something like the "center of mass" of a particular color and place X's in a line through that? Not sure. Example2 input: Row0: G G G Row1: Y R R Row2: Y Y R Output X positions: (0,2), (1,1), (2,0). That's anti-diagonal. What property of input leads to anti-diagonal? Let's examine distribution of colors. Count each color: G: row0 all three =3 R: row1 col1, col2 =2; row2 col2 =1 => total 3 Y: row1 col0 =1; row2 col0, col1 =2 => total 3 All three colors appear 3 times each. Balanced. Output is anti-diagonal. In example1, only one color present (G) count 9. Output top row. Maybe rule: Identify the three colors that appear (or up to three) and map each to a specific X position (maybe based on order). In example2 there are three colors each 3 times, maybe each color maps to one X position: G-> (0,2) maybe? R-> (1,1) maybe? Y-> (2,0). But why that mapping? Could be based on some ordering like alphabetical? G, R, Y alphabetical? G (green) first, R second, Y third. Positions maybe correspond to something like top row rightmost, middle, bottom left? Not clear. In example1 only one color G present, but output has three X's across top row. That would be mapping G to three positions? Actually maybe each occurrence of the most frequent color determines X positions: we need exactly three X's, maybe we take the three most frequent colors (or top three cells) and place X's at positions corresponding to their relative order in the input scanning order? Example1: scanning row-major, first three cells are G (positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2)). Output X's at those positions? But output X's are at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2) indeed! So maybe rule: take first three cells of input (row-major) and set X ... [8044 chars truncated]
"A composer listens to a chord and scores the resonance pattern. A unison note hums across a single staff line; a dyad vibrates along the descending strings; a triad reverberates against the ascending brass."
120b: k=2
See: A chord of colored tones rings out across a 3x3 sound field.
Do: Listen to how many distinct voices sing in the chord, then etch the resonance pattern in grey on a silent black score.
Grid: The score is 3x3, silent black, with three grey notes placed where the resonance lands.
We need to infer rule. We have two examples. Example1 Input: all G (green) 3x3. Output: first row all X (grey), rest rows all . (black). So three grey notes placed where resonance lands. The description: "Listen to how many distinct voices sing in the chord, then etch the resonance pattern in grey on a silent black score." So count distinct colors in input? Example1 distinct colors: only G => 1 distinct. Then output has three grey notes? Actually three X placed in first row. Maybe pattern based on count? 1 distinct leads to X in first row (maybe top row). Example2 Input grid: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Let's list distinct colors: G, Y, R => 3 distinct. Output: . . X . X . X . . Positions of X: (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) i.e., diagonal from top right to bottom left (anti-diagonal). That's three X's as well. So number of X's always three (as description says three grey notes placed where resonance lands). So we need to place three X's according to something derived from distinct colors count? In example1, X's are in first row (positions (1,1),(1,2),(1,3)). That's also three X's forming a horizontal line top row. In example2, they form anti-diagonal. Maybe rule: Determine the shape formed by the distinct colors' positions? Or maybe we map each distinct color to a direction (e.g., up, right, down) and then place X's accordingly. Let's examine input2: distribution of colors: G appears only in first row all three cells. Y appears in (2,1), (3,1), (3,2). R appears in (2,2),(2,3),(3,3). So each color forms a cluster. Perhaps we count the number of cells of each color? G count =3, Y count=3, R count=3. All equal. Maybe we order colors by something (e.g., alphabetical) and then place X's in pattern corresponding to that order? Not clear. Maybe rule: Identify the color that appears most frequently? In example1 only G. Then place X's in row corresponding to that color's position? Not. Another angle: The description: "Listen to how many distinct voices sing in the chord" => count distinct colors. Then "etch the resonance pattern in grey". The pattern maybe is a shape that corresponds to that count: 1 distinct => horizontal line (maybe representing a single note). 3 distinct => anti-diagonal (maybe representing three notes). But we need mapping for any count? Could be that we place X's in positions that correspond to the distinct colors' first occurrence coordinates? For example2 distinct colors: G first appears at (1,1). Y first appears at (2,1). R first appears at (2,2). If we take those coordinates and maybe sort them? Not produce anti-diagonal. Let's compute something: maybe we take the positions of each distinct color's centroid? For G centroid is (1,2) (since row1 all). Y centroid approx (3,1.33). R centroid (2.33,2.67). Not. Maybe we map distinct colors to numbers (e.g., G=1, Y=2, R=3) based on some ordering (maybe alphabetical). Then we place X's in cells where the sum of row+col equals that number? Not. Let's examine pattern: ... [1968 chars truncated]
"A referee surveys the jerseys on a playing field and signals the formation. Identical kits mean the team lines up shoulder to shoulder; two rival colors march in lockstep down the pitch; three factions scatter to opposite flanks."
120b: k=2
See: Players in colored jerseys fill the 3x3 pitch.
Do: Count the factions on the field and signal the grey markers into formation on the dark scoreboard.
Grid: The scoreboard is 3x3 black with three grey markers arranged according to the referee's call.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R etc. Output uses '.' (black) and X (grey). So output only black and grey. The description: "players in colored jerseys fill the 3x3 pitch. Count the factions on the field and signal the grey markers into formation on the dark scoreboard. Grid details: The scoreboard is 3x3 black with three grey markers arranged according to the referee's call." Interpretation: Count the factions (distinct colors?) and place three grey markers (X) on black board according to something. Example1: Input all G (green). So only one faction present. Output: first row all X, rest black. So three grey markers placed in first row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Let's count factions: colors present: G, Y, R. That's three distinct colors. Output: . . X . X . X . . Positions of X: (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) i.e., diagonal from top right to bottom left (anti-diagonal). That's three X's. So rule: number of distinct colors determines placement pattern? Example1 had 1 distinct color -> X's in first row (maybe top row). Example2 had 3 distinct colors -> X's on anti-diagonal. What about 2 distinct colors? Not given. Need to infer pattern: maybe placement corresponds to count: 1 -> top row, 2 -> maybe middle column? 3 -> anti-diagonal. Could be mapping of count to shape: 1 = horizontal line, 2 = vertical line, 3 = diagonal? But we need three X's always. So arrangement of three X's depends on number of distinct colors (factions). Could be like: 1 -> top row, 2 -> middle column, 3 -> anti-diagonal, 4 -> something else etc. But we only have up to 3. Test input: Y Y Y R G R G R G Let's count distinct colors: Y, R, G => three distinct colors again. So output should be same pattern as example2: anti-diagonal X's. Thus output grid: X at (1,3), (2,2), (3,1). All other cells '.'. So produce: Row1: . . X? Wait (1,3) X, others '.' => ". . X" Row2: . X . (since (2,2) X) Row3: X . . (since (3,1) X) Thus answer. Check if any other nuance: maybe count of each color matters? Example2: counts: G=3, Y=3, R=3 equal. Example1: G=9. Not helpful. But maybe rule: place X's at positions corresponding to colors sorted by some order? Eg map each distinct color to a specific position: maybe first color encountered (top-left) maps to top-left? Not. Given limited data, likely count-based. Thus answer grid as above. Let's format.
"A meteorologist reads the colors of the sky at dawn. A monochrome sky means the storm front rolls in flat along the horizon; two-toned skies send lightning arcing from one corner down to the other; a sky of three hues drives the wind diagonally against the grain."
120b: k=5
See: A 3x3 patch of dawn sky painted in colored bands.
Do: Read the atmospheric palette and chart the grey storm pattern on the dark radar screen.
Grid: The radar is 3x3 black. Three grey blips appear in a formation dictated by the sky's chromatic complexity.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3x3 input, output also 3x3 with only '.' (black) and 'X' (grey) maybe also other colors? In examples output only X and . . So rule maps certain positions to X based on input colors. Interpret metaphor: "3x3 patch of dawn sky painted in colored bands. Read the atmospheric palette and chart the grey storm pattern on the dark radar screen. The radar is 3x3 black. Three grey blips appear in a formation dictated by the sky's chromatic complexity." So we need to find three X positions (grey blips) maybe based on something like positions of a particular color or pattern. Let's list each example. Example1: Input all G (green). Output: first row all X, rest . . So X positions: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2) i.e., top row. Example2: Input: Row0: G G G Row1: Y R R Row2: Y Y R Output: Row0: . . X Row1: . X . Row2: X . . So X positions: (0,2), (1,1), (2,0) - a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left (anti-diagonal). That's three X's. Example3: Input all Y. Output same as example1: top row X's. Example4: Input: Row0: Y Y Y Row1: Y Y Y Row2: G G G Output: X . . . X . . . X That's main diagonal (top-left to bottom-right). X positions: (0,0),(1,1),(2,2). Example5: Input: Row0: R R R Row1: G R G Row2: G G G Output same as example4: main diagonal. So rule depends on composition of colors. Possibly the three X's correspond to positions of a particular color that appears exactly three times? Let's check. Example1: all G (9). No color appears exactly 3 times. But output is top row. Maybe rule: if a single color dominates (all same), output top row X. Example3 all Y also top row. Example2: Input colors counts: G appears 3 (row0 all G). Y appears 3 (row1 col0, row2 col0, row2 col1). R appears 3 (row1 col1, col2, row2 col2). So three colors each appear 3 times. Output anti-diagonal. Which color corresponds to anti-diagonal? Let's map positions: anti-diagonal cells are (0,2) G, (1,1) R, (2,0) Y. So each of the three colors appears at one of those positions. So maybe rule: place X at positions where each of the three colors that appear exactly three times intersect? Not clear. Example4: Input: Y appears 6 (first two rows), G appears 3 (bottom row). Output main diagonal. Which positions have G? bottom row (2,0),(2,1),(2,2) all G. But X positions are (0,0) Y, (1,1) Y, (2,2) G. Not just G. Example5: Input counts: R appears 4? Let's count: Row0 R R R (3), Row1 G R G (1 R) total 4 R. G appears 4? Row1 G _ G (2), Row2 G G G (3) total 5? Wait row2 has 3 G, plus row1 two G =5 G. So counts: R=4, G=5. No color appears exactly 3. Output main diagonal again. So maybe rule based on majority color? Example1 all G -> top row. Example3 all Y -> top row. Example4 majority Y (6) vs G (3) -> main diagonal. Example5 majority G (5) vs R (4) -> main diagonal. Example2 each color equal 3 -> anti-diagonal. Thus maybe rule: Determine which color is most frequent? Then map to a pattern: If majority color is G or Y? Wait exampl ... [2171 chars truncated]
"An architect surveys the materials delivered to a building site. If every brick is the same stone, the load-bearing wall runs flat across the foundation. Mixed materials require diagonal bracing — and the more diverse the supply, the more the brace tilts against convention."
120b: k=3
See: A 3x3 lot of colored building materials.
Do: Assess the variety of materials and place three grey structural supports on the dark blueprint in the bracing pattern the site demands.
Grid: The blueprint is 3x3, black background, with exactly three grey supports.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 grid of colors. Output is 3x3 with '.' black and 'X' grey placements (three X's). The description: "Assess the variety of materials and place three grey structural supports on the dark blueprint in the bracing pattern the site demands." So we need to place three X's based on variety of colors? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input all G (green). Output: first row all X, rest '.'. So when all same color, X's fill top row. Example3: Input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1: top row X's. Thus rule: if uniform color, X's in top row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . So X's placed in a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right (anti-diagonal). That's three X's forming a line. How determined? Input has variety of colors. Maybe we need to find the color that appears most? Let's count: G appears 3 (top row). Y appears 4? Row2: Y (1), Row3: Y Y (2) total 3? Wait row2 has Y at first column, row3 has Y Y at first two columns, that's 3 Y's. R appears 3 (row2 col2, col3; row3 col3). So counts: G=3, Y=3, R=3 all equal. So maybe rule: when three colors each appear three times, place X's in positions of the color that is "different"? Not. Look at positions of X's: (row1,col3), (row2,col2), (row3,col1). That's the anti-diagonal. What is special about those positions in input? Let's list input colors at those positions: (row1,col3) = G (row2,col2) = R (row3,col1) = Y So they are three different colors (G,R,Y). Maybe we need to place X's on cells that contain three distinct colors? But there are many cells with distinct colors. Maybe rule: Identify three colors that each appear exactly three times, then place X's on the cells where those three colors intersect in a pattern? Not. Another angle: The description: "Assess the variety of materials and place three grey structural supports on the dark blueprint in the bracing pattern the site demands." Could be about counting number of distinct colors (variety). If variety = 1 (uniform), place X's in top row. If variety = 3 (three distinct colors), place X's in anti-diagonal. Maybe other patterns for other variety counts. Test input: Y Y Y R G R G R G Let's count distinct colors: Y, R, G => three distinct colors. So likely pattern anti-diagonal again? But need to verify if anti-diagonal pattern is always for three distinct colors, regardless of distribution. Check example2: indeed three distinct colors present. Example1 and 3 have only one distinct color. So rule could be: If only one color present, X's fill top row. If three colors present, X's fill anti-diagonal. What about two colors? Not given. Thus for test input with three colors, output should be anti-diagonal X's. Thus output grid: positions (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) are X, others '.'. Let's produce: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . Same as example2 output. Thus answer. Check if any other nuance: maybe also need to consider which colors are pres ... [426 chars truncated]
"A general studies the banners on the battlefield. A single banner means the troops hold the line; two opposing banners demand a flanking advance from high ground to low; three banners trigger a counter-flanking retreat from the opposite direction."
120b: k=3
See: A 3x3 battlefield with colored banners.
Do: Read the allegiances on the field and deploy grey sentinels on the dark war map in the appropriate strategic formation.
Grid: The war map is 3x3 black with three grey sentinels positioned by the general's reading of the banners.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 grid with colors. Output uses only X (grey) and . (black). So rule maps certain positions to X based on input pattern. Example1: Input all G (green). Output first row X X X, rest rows . . . So X placed in top row. Example3: Input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1: top row X X X, rest . . . So same rule: when uniform color (any color) output top row X. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: Row1: . . X Row2: . X . Row3: X . . So X positions form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Output X at (0,2), (1,1), (2,0). That's anti-diagonal. What determines that? Input pattern maybe has something like count of each color? Let's examine input2 grid: G G G Y R R Y Y R Maybe we need to find the "majority color" or something and place X where that color is NOT present? Not. Let's see positions of something: maybe X placed where input color is same as some reference? For anti-diagonal positions, input colors are: (0,2)=G, (1,1)=R, (2,0)=Y. That's three different colors. Not helpful. Maybe rule: find the three distinct colors present, order them by some rule, then place X in positions corresponding to that order? Example2 has three colors: G, Y, R. Output X pattern is anti-diagonal. Example1 and 3 have only one color, output top row (maybe representing that color's "first row"?). Hmm. Maybe rule: Identify the "dominant color" (most frequent). In example2 counts: G appears 4? Let's count: G at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2) =3, plus maybe elsewhere? No other G. So G=3. Y appears at (1,0),(2,0),(2,1) =3. R appears at (1,1),(1,2),(2,2) =3. All equal. So tie. Then maybe we place X in positions where each of the three colors appears in a particular pattern: maybe each color corresponds to a row/col? Not. Maybe rule: For each color, find its "center of mass" and place X at that coordinate? For uniform color, center is whole grid, but they placed X across top row (maybe all cells in first row). Not. Maybe rule: The output X pattern is the shape of the "letter" formed by the most frequent color? Not. Let's think of transformation: Input is 3x3 with colors; output is 3x3 with X marking something like "positions of the three colors in a particular order: maybe sorted by alphabetical code (G, R, Y) and placed along anti-diagonal? In example2, anti-diagonal order from top-right to bottom-left corresponds to G (top-right), R (center), Y (bottom-left). That's alphabetical? G,R,Y alphabetical order is G,R,Y which matches anti-diagonal from top-right to bottom-left (positions (0,2) G, (1,1) R, (2,0) Y). So maybe rule: sort distinct colors alphabetically and place them on anti-diagonal from top-right to bottom-left. For uniform color case, only one distinct color, so fill top row? But why top row? If only one color, maybe we place X in the row corresponding to that color's alphabetical index? Not. Alternatively maybe rule: For each distinct color, place X in the row ... [1783 chars truncated]
"A stage director counts the speaking roles in a script. A monologue places the spotlight straight across the proscenium; a dialogue angles it from upstage-left to downstage-right; a three-voice ensemble reverses the angle from upstage-right to downstage-left."
120b: k=3
See: A 3x3 stage filled with costumed players in various colors.
Do: Count the distinct roles and aim the grey spotlights on the dark stage accordingly.
Grid: The stage is 3x3 black with three grey spotlights.
We need to infer rule. We have 3x3 grids. Input colors: G, Y, R, etc. Output uses only X (grey) and . (black). So rule maps positions to X or . based on something about input colors. Example1: Input all G. Output first row all X, other rows all . . . So X's in top row only. Example3: Input all Y. Output same as example1: top row X, rest . . . So regardless of color, if uniform? maybe count distinct colors? The description: "Count the distinct roles and aim the grey spotlights on the dark stage accordingly." Stage is 3x3 black with three grey spotlights. So we have three X's (grey spotlights). They are placed according to something about distinct colors count? In examples, there are three X's placed in some pattern. Example1: all G => only one distinct color (G). But we have three X's placed in top row (positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2)). That's three X's contiguous. Example3: all Y => also one distinct color, same pattern. Example2: Input: Row0: G G G Row1: Y R R Row2: Y Y R Let's list distinct colors: G, Y, R => three distinct colors. Output: Row0: . . X Row1: . X . Row2: X . . So X's form a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right (anti-diagonal). That's three X's placed each in a different row and column, like a permutation. So rule maybe: number of distinct colors determines placement pattern of three X's. If distinct count =1, place X's in top row. If distinct count =3, place X's on anti-diagonal. What about distinct count =2? Not given. Need to infer maybe other pattern like middle column? Let's think. The description: "Count the distinct roles and aim the grey spotlights on the dark stage accordingly." So we count distinct colors (roles). Then we aim the three grey spotlights accordingly. Possibly mapping: distinct count = 1 => all three spotlights in first row (left to right). Distinct count = 2 => maybe second row? Distinct count = 3 => anti-diagonal. Could be mapping to binary representation? Or maybe the positions correspond to the colors themselves: each distinct color maps to a specific column/row based on some ordering (e.g., alphabetical). In example2, distinct colors are G, R, Y. Output X positions: (0,2) column 2, (1,1) column1, (2,0) column0. That's reverse order of something? Let's order colors maybe by some hierarchy: maybe G (green) first, R (red) second, Y (yellow) third. The X's placed such that column index corresponds to rank? For row0 (first row) column2 (rightmost) maybe corresponds to first color? Not sure. Alternatively, maybe we count number of each color and place X's according to majority? Example1 all G, majority G, place X's in top row. Example2 distribution: G appears 3 times, Y appears 4 times, R appears 2 times. Not equal. But pattern anti-diagonal maybe corresponds to ordering of colors by frequency descending? Frequencies: Y=4, G=3, R=2. If we map rows to colors sorted descending: row0 Y, row1 G, row2 R. Then X placed at column where that color appears in that row? Row0 (Y) appears at colu ... [1787 chars truncated]
"A gardener inspects the flower bed and decides where to lay stepping stones. A bed of one bloom gets stones along the garden wall; two varieties earn a winding path from gate to gazebo; three species demand a crossing path from the opposite corner."
120b: k=3
See: A 3x3 flower bed of colored blooms.
Do: Survey the floral diversity and place three grey stepping stones on the dark soil.
Grid: The garden plot is 3x3 dark soil with three grey stones whose path reflects the variety of blooms.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3 grid, output also 3x3 with X (grey) placed three stones, and '.' black elsewhere? In examples, output uses X and . only. So rule: place three X's based on something about colors diversity. Example1: Input all G (green). Output: first row all X, rest . . . So three X's in first row. Example3: Input all Y (yellow). Output same as example1: first row X X X. So when uniform color, X's placed in first row. Example2: Input: Row1: G G G Row2: Y R R Row3: Y Y R Output: . . X . X . X . . Positions of X: (1,3), (2,2), (3,1) i.e. diagonal from top right to bottom left. That's three X's placed along anti-diagonal. What determines placement? Maybe based on count of each color? Let's analyze. Input2 colors: G appears 3 (first row). Y appears 3 (row2 col1, row3 col1-2). R appears 3 (row2 col2-3, row3 col3). So three colors each appearing three times. So each color count equal. Then X placed on anti-diagonal? Maybe mapping each color to a position based on something like order of colors in some list? But output only X's, not colors. Maybe rule: Identify three most frequent colors? In example2 all three colors tie. Then place X's at positions of those colors? Let's see positions of each color: G at (1,1)(1,2)(1,3). Y at (2,1)(3,1)(3,2). R at (2,2)(2,3)(3,3). The X positions are (1,3) which is G, (2,2) which is R, (3,1) which is Y. So each X corresponds to one of each color, picking maybe the "median" position? Not clear. Maybe rule: For each color, place X at the cell that is the "center of mass" of that color? For G, its cells are top row; median column is 2, but X placed at (1,3) not median. For Y, cells at (2,1),(3,1),(3,2) median maybe (3,1) which matches X at (3,1). For R cells at (2,2),(2,3),(3,3) median maybe (2,3) or (2,2). X at (2,2). So not consistent. Alternative: maybe rule: Identify three colors that are not the majority? In uniform case, only one color present, so X placed in first row (maybe arbitrary). In mixed case, maybe we need to place X's on cells that are unique in row/col? Let's examine pattern: X's form anti-diagonal. Could be that we need to place X's on cells that are the only occurrence of their color in their row and column? Check (1,3) G: row1 has all G, column3 has G,R,R. Not unique. Maybe rule: rotate the grid 90 degrees? Not. Consider that output X's correspond to positions where the three colors appear in a "cycle" order reading rows? Not. Maybe rule: The three X's are placed at positions that would form a line (anti-diagonal) regardless of input, but only when there are three distinct colors each appearing three times. In uniform case, they placed X's in first row (also three X's in a line). So rule: always place three X's in a straight line (row, column, or diagonal) based on something about input diversity. For uniform, line is top row. For mixed with three colors, line is anti-diagonal. Maybe other possibilities: if there are exactly two colors? Not given. We need to predict for t ... [882 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains one or more L-shaped trominos (groups of exactly 3 colored cells) on a black background. Each tromino occupies 3 out of 4 cells of a 2×2 bounding box, forming an L-shape. The 4th corner of that 2×2 box is empty (black).
Do: For each L-shaped tromino, identify its 2×2 bounding box and locate the missing (empty) 4th corner. Determine the diagonal direction that points away from the center of the L-shape (i.e., outward from the missing corner, away from the occupied cells). Starting from that missing corner, draw a diagonal line of colored cells (using the same color as the tromino) extending one cell at a time in that direction until reaching the edge of the grid. Do not modify the original tromino cells.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input (typically 10×10). The background is black (.). The coordinate system is row-column with (0,0) at the top-left. All original cells are preserved; only new diagonal trail cells are added.
"A boomerang's throw traces the arc of its missing wing"
120b: k=1
See: On a dark field, small boomerangs rest in different orientations — each one a colored L-shape missing a single wing tip, as if snapped off before flight.
Do: Each broken boomerang launches from its missing wing tip. The ghost of the lost piece flies outward along the diagonal it would have traced, leaving a streak of color behind it as it sails away until it vanishes beyond the edge of the field. The boomerang itself stays planted where it lies.
Grid: The dark field keeps its original size. The boomerangs remain exactly where they fell. Only the flight trails — colored streaks from each missing tip — are new marks on the field.
We need to infer rule. Description: boomerangs are L-shape missing a tip. Each missing tip launches a colored streak along diagonal outward. We need to identify L-shape pattern: In example 1 input, there are W's forming small L shapes missing a tip. Let's map coordinates. Grid 10x10. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1 positions of W: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These look like two L shapes? First cluster: (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L shape missing (2,3) tip? That's a 2x2 block missing bottom-left. That's like a boomerang missing tip at (2,3). The missing tip is diagonal from the corner? The L shape orientation: The missing tip is the cell that would complete the 2x2 square. So missing tip is at (2,3). According to description, ghost flies outward along diagonal from missing tip. Which diagonal? The diagonal that would have been traced by the missing piece? For a missing bottom-left cell, the diagonal direction outward would be down-left? Actually from missing tip (2,3) outward away from the L shape? Let's see output: Additional W's appear along a diagonal line from that missing tip outward until edge. Output has extra W's at positions: (1,9?) Wait output row1 (index1) has W at col9? Let's list output W positions: Row1 (index1): columns 3,4,9? Actually output row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" => cols3,4,9. Row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." => cols4,8. Row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." => cols2,7. Row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." => cols1,6. Row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." => cols0,5. Row6: ". . . W . . . . . ." => col3. Row7: ". . . W W . . . . ." => cols3,4. Rows8-9 unchanged. So new W's added form a diagonal line from missing tip (2,3) moving down-left? Let's see coordinates: missing tip (2,3). Down-left diagonal would be (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) then out. Indeed we have W at (3,2) row3 col2? Output row3 (index3) has W at col2 yes. Row4 col1 yes. Row5 col0 yes. That's the diagonal down-left. Also there is a diagonal up-right? Not present. So only one direction. What about second L shape at (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4) (top-right missing). Missing tip at (6,4). Diagonal outward from missing tip would be up-right? Actually missing top-right, outward direction would be up-right (north-east). Let's see added W's: from (6,4) go up-right: (5,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9). Indeed output has W at (5,5) row5 col5 yes, (4,6) row4 col6 yes, (3,7) row3 col7 yes, (2,8) row2 col8 yes, (1,9) row1 col9 yes. So matches. Thus rule: Identify each L-shaped pattern of three same-colored cells forming a 2x2 block missing one cell (the "missing tip"). For each such shape, extend a line of that color from the missing cell outward along the diagonal away from the existing cells (i.e., direction from the missing cell opposite the interior of the L). Fill cells along that diagonal until edge, leaving original cells unchanged. Now test input with A's. Let's locate A positions. Rows: Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2: col4 A (since ". . . . A . . . . .") index2 ... [2857 chars truncated]
"A three-legged cell senses the void in its membrane and extends a pseudopod through the gap, reaching across the petri dish until it touches the glass wall."
120b: fail
See: Small three-celled organisms rest on a dark substrate, each missing one limb from an otherwise square body plan.
Do: Each organism detects its absent limb and grows a filament of identical tissue outward through that gap, stretching diagonally cell by cell until it reaches the boundary of the culture.
Grid: Same dimensions as input. The dark substrate and original organisms remain unchanged. New tissue cells appear along the diagonal extension path.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10 with W cells forming small organisms? Let's map. Input example1 coordinates (row, col 0-index). Let's list W positions: Row1 (index1): columns 3,4 (two adjacent) Row2: col4 Row6: col3 Row7: col3,4 So there are three clusters? Let's visualize: Rows: 0: none 1: ...WW... 2: ....W... 3: ....... 4: ....... 5: ....... 6: ...W.... 7: ...WW... others empty. Each organism is "three-celled organisms rest on a dark substrate, each missing one limb from an otherwise square body plan." So each organism likely is a 2x2 block missing one cell (so three cells). Indeed a 2x2 square missing one corner yields three cells. In input we have such shapes? Let's check cluster at rows1-2 cols3-4: cells at (1,3),(1,4),(2,4). That's a 2x2 missing (2,3) bottom-left corner. So missing limb is at (2,3). Another cluster at rows6-7 cols3-4: cells (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4) top-right? Wait shape: positions (6,3) top-left, (7,3) bottom-left, (7,4) bottom-right. Missing (6,4) top-right. That's also a 2x2 missing one cell. Third cluster? Actually there is also a single W at (2,4) already part of first cluster. No other W. So only two organisms? Wait there is also a W at (6,3) part of second cluster. So two organisms. Now output adds new tissue cells along diagonal extension from missing limb outward until boundary. Let's see output W positions added: Output rows: Row1 unchanged? Row1 (index1) same: ...WW... Row2 (index2): ....W... plus new W at col8? Actually output row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." So original at col4, new at col8. That's diagonal from missing cell (2,3) direction? Missing cell at (2,3). Diagonal outward maybe down-right? Starting from missing cell, go down-right (increase row and col) until boundary. Starting at (2,3) -> (3,4) -> (4,5) -> (5,6) -> (6,7) -> (7,8) -> (8,9) boundary? But output shows new W at (2,8) not (3,4). Wait maybe direction is up-right? Let's compute other added cells. Output row0? Row0 unchanged. Row2 (index2) new at col8 (row2). That's same row as missing cell, not diagonal. Let's list all new W positions in output not present in input: From output grid: Row0 none. Row1: same as input. Row2: new at col8. Row3: row3 output: ". . W . . . . W . ." => new at col2 and col7. Row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." => new at col1 and col6. Row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." => new at col0 and col5. Row6: same as input (row6 had W at col3) no new. Row7: same as input. Rows8-9 none. So new W cells form a diagonal line from near top-left to bottom-right? Let's map coordinates: (2,8) (3,2) and (3,7) (4,1) and (4,6) (5,0) and (5,5) Looks like two diagonal lines emanating from each missing limb. First organism missing at (2,3). Diagonal direction maybe up-left? Starting from missing cell (2,3) go up-left: (1,2),(0,1) but not present. Another direction maybe down-left: (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) which matches new cells at (3,2),(4,1),(5,0). Yes those are present. So for first organism, e ... [11297 chars truncated]
"A constellation missing its fourth star emits a jet of light from the void, the beam streaking diagonally across the night sky until it vanishes past the observatory's field of view."
120b: fail
See: Three-star clusters form L-shapes against a dark sky, each cluster fitting within a square region with one star position empty.
Do: A luminous jet of the constellation's color shoots from the empty star position diagonally outward, adding one stellar point per cell until it exits the visible sky.
Grid: Sky field unchanged. Original stars preserved. Jet points added along the diagonal from the void to the field edge.
We need to infer rule. From description: three-star clusters form L-shapes within a square region with one star position empty. The empty position is where jet starts, shoots diagonally outward adding points of same color until exits grid. Look at example1: Input has W (maroon) forming L shapes? Let's map coordinates. Grid 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input1 positions of W: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These are two L shapes? First cluster: rows1-2 cols3-4 forms a 2x2 square missing (2,3) empty. That's L shape with empty at bottom-left (2,3). Second cluster: rows6-7 cols3-4 also missing (6,4)? Wait positions: (6,3) only, (7,3),(7,4). That's also a 2x2 missing (6,4) top-right? Actually shape: cells at (6,3) (7,3) (7,4) missing (6,4). That's L shape with empty at (6,4). So each cluster is a 2x2 block with three cells filled, one empty. Now output adds W along diagonal from empty outward. For first cluster empty at (2,3). Diagonal direction outward? "diagonally outward" meaning away from cluster center? Which diagonal? In output, we see new W at (1,9?) Let's list output W positions: From output grid lines: Row1 (index0) none. Row1 (index1): positions (1,3),(1,4) original, plus (1,9)?? Actually row1 line: ". . . W W . . . . W" that's row index1. So extra W at col9. Row2 (index2): ". . . . W . . . W ." extra at col8. Row3 (index3): ". . W . . . . W . ." extra at col7? Wait row3 line: ". . W . . . . W . ." So W at col2 and col7. Row4 (index4): ". W . . . . W . . ." W at col1 and col6. Row5 (index5): "W . . . . W . . . ." W at col0 and col5. Row6 (index6): ". . . W . . . . . ." original at (6,3) unchanged. Row7 (index7): ". . . W W . . . . ." original cluster unchanged. Thus added W's form a diagonal line from empty (2,3) down-left? Let's see coordinates of added W: (5,0) (4,1) (3,2) (2,8) (1,9) also (3,7) (4,6) (5,5). Wait there are two diagonals? Actually we have two clusters, each adds its own diagonal. First cluster empty at (2,3). Diagonal outward direction? The added W's for that cluster appear at (5,0),(4,1),(3,2) which is direction up-left? Actually from empty (2,3) moving down-left would be (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) etc. Yes that's down-left direction (row+1, col-1). Continue until edge: next would be (6,-1) out of grid, stop. So we have three added W's along that diagonal. Second cluster empty at (6,4). Diagonal outward direction? Added W's at (5,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9) which is up-right direction (row-1, col+1). Yes from (6,4) moving up-right yields (5,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9). So rule: For each 2x2 L-shaped cluster of same color, find the empty cell of the 2x2 block. From that empty cell, extend a line of same color diagonally outward away from the cluster (i.e., away from the three filled cells). Determine direction: The empty cell is opposite the corner formed by the three cells. The three cells occupy the other three corners of the 2x2. The empty corner is opposite the "filled corner"? Actually the three cells ... [5417 chars truncated]
"A damaged sail with a torn corner lets the wind through, and the escaping gust drives a wake of foam diagonally across the sea until it dissolves at the horizon."
120b: k=1
See: Three-cell sail patches form L-shapes on a dark ocean, each occupying three corners of a square rigging frame with one corner torn away.
Do: Wind escaping through each torn corner drives a foam trail diagonally outward from the sail, marking one wave crest per cell until the trail reaches the ocean's edge.
Grid: Ocean grid same size. Sail patches untouched. Foam trail cells added from the tear to the boundary.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10 with some W (maroon) cells forming L shapes? Let's map. Input example1 coordinates (row, col 0-index). Let's list W positions: Row1 (index1): columns 3,4 (two adjacent) Row2: col4 Row6: col3 Row7: col3,4 So we have two L shapes? Let's visualize. Rows 1-2: at (1,3)(1,4)(2,4) forms an L missing corner at (2,3) (torn away). That's an L shape of three cells occupying three corners of a 2x2 square, missing bottom-left. Rows 6-7: (6,3)(7,3)(7,4) forms L missing top-right? Actually positions: (6,3) top left, (7,3) bottom left, (7,4) bottom right. Missing (6,4) top right. So also L shape. Thus each L shape is three cells of same color (W) forming a 2x2 block missing one corner (the "torn corner"). Now output adds foam trail diagonally outward from the torn corner, marking one wave crest per cell until reaching edge. We need to see output: Additional W cells added along diagonal from missing corner outward. First L: missing corner at (2,3) (row2 col3). Diagonal outward direction? "diagonally outward from the sail" meaning away from the L shape? Which direction? For first L, the missing corner is bottom-left of the 2x2? Wait L shape: cells at (1,3) top-left, (1,4) top-right, (2,4) bottom-right. Missing (2,3) bottom-left. So missing corner is bottom-left. Diagonal outward from that corner would be down-left direction (southwest) maybe? Let's see output added W cells: In output, new W cells appear at positions: Row1: same as input unchanged. Row2: same plus at col9? Actually output row1 (index0) unchanged. Row2 (index1) has original W at 3,4 and also new W at col9? Wait output row1 (index1) line: ". . . W W . . . . W". So extra W at column9 (0-index). That's far right, not diagonal from missing corner. Row3 (index2): ". . . . W . . . W ." extra W at col8. Row4 (index3): ". . W . . . . W . ." extra W at col2 and col7. Row5 (index4): ". W . . . . W . . ." extra W at col1 and col6. Row6 (index5): "W . . . . W . . . ." extra W at col0 and col5. Rows7-8 unchanged. So we see a diagonal line of W from near top-left to bottom-right? Let's map coordinates of added W (excluding original). Original W positions: (1,3)(1,4)(2,4)(6,3)(7,3)(7,4). Added W positions: (1,9) (2,8) (3,2) (3,7) (4,1) (4,6) (5,0) (5,5) These seem to form two diagonal lines? Let's examine first L missing corner (2,3). Diagonal outward maybe direction down-left (southwest) would go to (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) then edge. Indeed we have added W at (3,2),(4,1),(5,0). That's a line SW from missing corner (2,3) to edge row5 col0 (since grid 10x10, further would be (6,-1) out). So that matches. Second L missing corner at (6,4) (top-right missing). Diagonal outward direction up-right (northeast) would go to (5,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9) then edge. Indeed we have added W at those coordinates. So rule: For each L shape of three same-colored cells forming a 2x2 block missing one corner, we extend a line of same color from the missing corner ou ... [4271 chars truncated]
"A circuit board with a missing component at one corner of a chip leaks current through the gap, the charge arcing diagonally across the board until it grounds at the edge."
120b: k=1
See: Three-cell component clusters form L-shapes on a dark circuit board, each seated in a square footprint with one pad vacant.
Do: Electrical current of the component's color arcs from the vacant pad diagonally outward, jumping one trace per cell until it reaches the board edge and grounds.
Grid: Board dimensions unchanged. Components intact. Arc trace cells added along the diagonal to the edge.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has W (maroon) forming L-shaped clusters of three cells with one empty cell in 2x2 square? Let's examine example1 input coordinates. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input W positions: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These are two L shapes: first at rows1-2 cols3-4: cells (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forming L with missing (2,3) vacant pad. Second at rows6-7 cols3-4: cells (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4) vacant. Output adds new W cells along diagonal from vacant pad outward to edge. Let's see output W positions additional: From output list: many W's added. Let's compute for first L: vacant pad at (2,3). Diagonal outward? Which direction? The description: "arc from the vacant pad diagonally outward, jumping one trace per cell until it reaches the board edge". So from vacant pad, go diagonally outward (which direction?) Probably away from the L shape, i.e., direction that is opposite the interior of L? For L shape orientation: cells at (1,3) top-left, (1,4) top-right, (2,4) bottom-right. Missing (2,3) bottom-left. The diagonal outward from missing cell could be down-right? Actually from missing cell (2,3), the L occupies up and right cells, so outward diagonal would be down-left? Let's see output added W's: output has W at (1,5)? Wait output row1 col? Let's list output W coordinates: Row1 (index1): (1,3),(1,4) original, plus (1,9?) Actually output row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" => W at col3,4,9. So new W at (1,9). That's far right same row. That's not diagonal from (2,3). Another new W at row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." => W at (2,4) original, plus (2,8). Row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." => W at (3,2) and (3,7). Row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." => W at (4,1) and (4,6). Row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." => W at (5,0) and (5,5). So pattern: a diagonal line of W from near (2,3) moving down-left to edge? Let's see coordinates: (5,0) is down-left from (2,3) by (3,-3). Also (4,1) (2,3)+(2,-2). (3,2) (2,3)+(1,-1). So indeed diagonal down-left direction from vacant pad (2,3) to edge (row5 col0) continues until edge. Also there is a diagonal up-right? Actually also there are W at (1,9) and (2,8) and (3,7) etc. That's diagonal up-right from (2,3)? Let's compute: (2,3) to (1,4) is up-right but that's occupied. But the line up-right from (2,3) goes (1,4) occupied, (0,5) would be edge but not present. However output has W at (1,9) far right not on that line. Wait maybe there are two L shapes, each creates diagonal outward in opposite direction? Let's examine second L: cells at (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4). Vacant pad (6,4). Diagonal outward from (6,4) maybe down-right? Let's see added W near that area: output rows6-? Row6 (index6): ". . . W . . . . . ." => W at (6,3) original, no new. Row7: ". . . W W . . . . ." unchanged. No new beyond. So maybe the diagonal from (6,4) goes up-left? That would be (5,3),(4,2),(3,1),(2,0). Output has W at (5,5) not (5,3). Hmm. Let's map added W positions: (1,9),(2,8),(3,7),(4,6),(5,5) form ... [5794 chars truncated]
"A three-headed guardian missing its fourth horn channels cursed energy through the gap in its crown, the hex streaking diagonally into the void until it strikes the world's edge."
120b: k=1
See: Three-celled mythic glyphs form L-shapes on a dark tablet, each inscribed within a square seal with one corner unsealed.
Do: Cursed energy of the glyph's hue escapes through the unsealed corner and blazes diagonally outward, scorching one rune per cell until it reaches the tablet's border.
Grid: Tablet dimensions preserved. Glyphs untouched. Scorched rune cells mark the diagonal from the open corner to the edge.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10 with some W (maroon) forming L-shaped glyphs? Let's examine input example 1. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input has W at positions: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These look like two L shapes? First L: cells (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L with corner at (1,4) maybe? Actually shape: a 2x2 block missing (2,3). That's an L shape with missing lower-left corner. The open corner is (2,3) (the missing cell). Second L: (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) similar missing (6,4). Open corner (6,4). Now output adds additional W cells along diagonal from open corner outward to border. Let's see output W positions beyond original: Output grid shows many W's forming diagonal lines from those open corners. List output W positions: From output: Row1 (index1): (1,3),(1,4) same as input, plus (1,9)?? Actually output row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" So at (1,9) also W. Row2 (2): ". . . . W . . . W ." => (2,4) original, plus (2,8) W. Row3 (3): ". . W . . . . W . ." => (3,2) W, (3,7) W. Row4 (4): ". W . . . . W . . ." => (4,1) W, (4,6) W. Row5 (5): "W . . . . W . . . ." => (5,0) W, (5,5) W. Row6 (6): ". . . W . . . . . ." => (6,3) original. Row7 (7): ". . . W W . . . . ." => (7,3),(7,4) original. Rows 0,8,9 unchanged. So we see for first L (top left) open corner at (2,3). Diagonal outward direction? The description: "cursed energy escapes through the unsealed corner and blazes diagonally outward, scorching one rune per cell until it reaches the tablet's border." So from open corner, go diagonally outward (which direction?). For first L, open corner (2,3). The added W's are at (3,2), (4,1), (5,0) - that's down-left diagonal (row+1, col-1). Also there is a W at (1,9) and (2,8) and (3,7) and (4,6) and (5,5). That's a different diagonal: up-right? Let's see: Starting from open corner (2,3), up-right diagonal would be (1,4) which is already W (part of L). Continue to (0,5) but not present. However we see W at (1,9) far away not along that line. Wait maybe there are two L shapes, each produces diagonal outward from its open corner away from the L shape interior. For first L, interior is the 2x2 block missing lower-left. The open corner is lower-left (2,3). The diagonal outward could be down-left (southwest) direction, which matches added W's at (3,2),(4,1),(5,0). Good. For second L, open corner at (6,4). Diagonal outward would be up-right (northeast) direction? Let's see added W's: (5,5) (row5 col5) is up-right from (6,4). Then (4,6), (3,7), (2,8), (1,9). Yes matches. So rule: For each L-shaped glyph (3 cells forming a 2x2 missing one corner), identify the missing corner (the unsealed corner). Then extend a line of same color diagonally outward away from the 3 cells (i.e., direction from the missing corner opposite the interior of the L). Fill cells along that diagonal until border. Thus we need to apply to test input with A (azure) glyphs. Let's parse test input grid 10x10. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . ... [4912 chars truncated]
"Three dancers holding an L-formation spin their missing partner's ghost outward through the open corner, the phantom's afterimages stepping diagonally across the floor until they fade beyond the stage."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Trios of colored dancers form L-shapes on a dark dance floor, each group positioned within a square formation with one corner empty.
Do: A phantom dancer in matching color leaps from the empty position and glides diagonally outward, leaving an afterimage at each step until exiting the floor.
Grid: Floor unchanged in size. Original dancers remain. Afterimage cells placed along the diagonal from the empty corner to the floor edge.
"A fractured crystal missing one vertex from its square lattice releases a vein of mineral through the crack, the deposit streaking diagonally through the bedrock until it surfaces at the cliff face."
120b: fail
See: Three-cell mineral deposits form L-shapes in dark rock, each fitting within a square crystal lattice with one vertex fractured away.
Do: A mineral vein of matching color seeps from the fractured vertex diagonally outward through the rock, depositing one crystal per cell until it reaches the rock's outer edge.
Grid: Rock slab same dimensions. Original deposits preserved. Vein crystals added along the diagonal from the fracture to the boundary.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Three-cell mineral deposits form L-shapes in dark rock, each fitting within a square crystal lattice with one vertex fractured away. What to do: A mineral vein of matching color seeps from the fractured vertex diagonally outward through the rock, depositing one crystal per cell until it reaches the rock's outer edge. Grid details: Rock slab same dimensions. Original deposits preserved. Vein crystals added along the diagonal from the fracture to the boundary." Interpretation: Input contains L-shaped clusters of same color of size 3 cells (forming a 2x2 block missing one cell). The missing cell is the "fractured vertex". From that missing cell, we extend a diagonal line outward (presumably away from the L shape) until hitting edge, filling with same color. In example 1, color is W (maroon). Input shows several W L-shapes? Let's map. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate W cells. Row1 index0? Let's index rows 0-9, columns 0-9. Given input lines: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . W W . . . . . Row2: . . . . W . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . W . . . . . . Row7: . . . W W . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . Let's map coordinates (r,c). W at (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L? That's cells: (1,3) (1,4) (2,4). That's a shape like a corner missing (2,3). So missing vertex is (2,3). From that missing vertex, we extend diagonal outward. Which diagonal? Likely down-left? Since missing vertex is bottom-left of the L? Actually L shape orientation: cells at top row (1,3)-(1,4) horizontal, and vertical down from (1,4) to (2,4). So missing cell is (2,3) which is down-left from (1,4). The diagonal outward from missing vertex would be direction down-left? Continue until edge. Starting at (2,3) then (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) then out of grid. In output, we see new W's at those positions? Let's check output grid. Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . W W . . . . W Row2: . . . . W . . . W . Row3: . . W . . . . W . . Row4: . W . . . . W . . . Row5: W . . . . W . . . . Row6: . . . W . . . . . . Row7: . . . W W . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . We see original W's unchanged at (1,3),(1,4),(2,4),(6,3),(7,3),(7,4). Additional W's appear along diagonal from (2,3) down-left: (2,3) is now? In output row2 col3? Row2 col3 is '.'? Wait row2 col3 index? Row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." positions: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 W,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 W,9 . So (2,3) is '.' not filled. Hmm maybe diagonal direction is up-right? Let's examine added W's: Additional W's at (1,9), (2,8), (3,7), (4,6), (5,5), (5,5) is W? Row5 col5 is W (since row5: "W . . . . W . . . .": col0 W, col5 W). Also (3,2) is W (row3 col2). (4,1) is W (row4 col1). So we have a diagonal from (5,0) up-right? Let's list coordinates of added W's not in original: (1,9) (2,8) (3,7) (4,6) (5,5) (5,0) is original? Actually (5,0) is W added? Row5 col0 is W (added). That's par ... [9716 chars truncated]
"A broken cookie remembers where its crumb fell and drizzles icing from the gap, letting gravity pull the glaze diagonally off the edge of the baking sheet."
120b: k=2
See: Small L-shaped pastry fragments sit on a dark tray, each clearly snapped from what was once a square piece.
Do: From the point where each fragment broke, a thin line of matching glaze drips away diagonally—always falling outward from the intact mass—until it runs off the tray.
Grid: Tray dimensions unchanged. Original fragments untouched. Glaze trail added from the break point to the tray edge.
We need to infer rule. The description: "Small L-shaped pastry fragments sit on a dark tray, each clearly snapped from what was once a square piece. From the point where each fragment broke, a thin line of matching glaze drips away diagonally—always falling outward from the intact mass—until it runs off the tray." Interpretation: Input contains L-shaped fragments of a color (non-black). They are like a 2x2 square missing one cell? L shape: three cells forming an L (like a 2x2 with one missing). The break point is the missing corner? The glaze line extends diagonally outward from the break point (the missing cell) until edge, using same color. In example 1: color W (maroon). Input shows several W cells forming L shapes? Let's map coordinates. Grid 10x10. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input1 W positions: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These are two L shapes? First L at rows1-2 cols3-4: cells (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L missing (2,3) which is the break point (the missing corner). Second L at rows6-7 cols3-4: cells (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4). So break points are (2,3) and (6,4). Output adds diagonal lines from break points outward. Check output1: Additional W cells appear at positions: Row0? none. Row1: (1,8)?? Actually output row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" So extra W at (1,9). That's diagonal from break point (2,3) outward? Let's compute direction: break point (2,3) is missing cell; outward direction is away from intact mass. The intact mass is the L shape cells. The missing corner is adjacent to two cells: one above? Actually L shape orientation: cells at (1,3) (top left), (1,4) (top right), (2,4) (bottom right). Missing (2,3) is bottom left corner. The intact mass is to the north and east of break point. So outward direction would be southwest? Wait "always falling outward from the intact mass". So from break point, line goes away from the mass, i.e., opposite direction of where the mass is. The mass occupies north and east of break point, so outward direction is south-west (down-left). Diagonal direction (down-left) from (2,3) would go to (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) until edge. In output, we see W at (3,2)?? Output row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." That's (3,2) yes. Also (4,1) row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." includes (4,1). Also (5,0) row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." includes (5,0). So indeed line goes down-left. Also there is another line from break point (6,4) outward. Missing cell (6,4) is top right corner? L cells: (6,3) left, (7,3) bottom left, (7,4) bottom right. Missing (6,4) is top right. Mass occupies south and west of break point, so outward direction is north-east (up-right). Diagonal from (6,4) up-right: (5,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9). Output shows W at (5,5) row5 col5 yes (row5: "W . . . . W . . . .") includes (5,5). Row4 col6 (4,6) row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." includes (4,6). Row3 col7 (3,7) row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." includes (3,7). Row2 col8 (2,8) row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." includes (2,8). Row1 col9 (1,9) row1: ". . . W W . . . ... [7534 chars truncated]
"A chord missing its root note sends a resonance escaping through the silence, each overtone stepping further into the quiet until it fades beyond the concert hall."
120b: k=1
See: Clusters of three identical notes huddle in a square arrangement on a silent staff, each cluster conspicuously missing one corner tone.
Do: From each absent note, a trail of echoing harmonics radiates diagonally outward away from the chord body, one step at a time, until reaching the edge of the composition.
Grid: Staff dimensions preserved. Original note clusters intact. Echo tones fill the diagonal path from the missing position to the boundary.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10. There are clusters of three identical notes in a square arrangement missing one corner. So a 2x2 block with three same color, one missing (black). In example 1, color W (maroon). Let's locate clusters. Input example1 grid coordinates (row, col 0-index). Let's map. Rows: 0 all . 1: col3 W, col4 W (two adjacent horizontally) 2: col4 W (single below right) 3-... etc 6: row6 col3 W 7: row7 col3 W, col4 W So we have two clusters? Let's see pattern: At rows1-2-? Actually cluster shape: a 2x2 square missing one corner. For first cluster: positions (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) present, missing (2,3). That's a missing corner at bottom-left of the 2x2 block. For second cluster: positions (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) present, missing (6,4). That's missing top-right corner. Thus two clusters of three W's each. Rule: From each absent note (the missing corner), a trail of echoing harmonics radiates diagonally outward away from the chord body, one step at a time, until reaching the edge. So from missing corner, we draw a diagonal line outward away from the cluster (i.e., away from the three notes). For first cluster missing (2,3) bottom-left corner. The cluster body is the three notes forming an L shape. The missing corner is bottom-left; direction outward would be down-left? Let's think: The cluster occupies top row (1,3)-(1,4) and right column (2,4). The missing corner is at (2,3) which is below-left of the top row. The "away from chord body" likely means direction away from the three notes, i.e., opposite direction of the interior of the L. The interior is the area of the 2x2 block; missing corner is at (2,3). The three notes are at positions north, east, north-east relative to missing corner. So outward direction would be south-west (down-left) from missing corner. Indeed output shows a diagonal line of W's from (2,3) outward to edge? Let's check output. Output grid: we see many W's added. List output W positions: Row1 col3,4 same as input. Row1 col9? Actually row1 (index1) has W at col9? Output row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" So extra W at (1,9). That's far right top row. Not from first cluster. Row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." => W at (2,4) original, plus W at (2,8). Row2 col8. Row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." => W at (3,2) and (3,7). Row3 col2 and col7. Row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." => W at (4,1) and (4,6). Row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." => W at (5,0) and (5,5). Row6: ". . . W . . . . . ." => original (6,3) unchanged. Row7: ". . . W W . . . . ." => original (7,3),(7,4). Thus we see a diagonal line of W from (5,0) up to (1,9) maybe? Let's map coordinates of added W's (excluding original cluster positions). Added: (5,0), (4,1), (3,2), (2,8), (1,9), (3,7), (4,6), (5,5). Wait there are two diagonals? Let's examine pattern: There is a diagonal from (5,0) up-right to (1,4?) Actually (5,0) to (4,1) to (3,2) to (2,3?) but (2,3) is missing corner. Indeed (2,3) is the missing spot. Then continue to (1,4) which is origin ... [5505 chars truncated]
"A formation with a gap in its corner launches the ball through the opening, and it rolls diagonally across the field until it crosses the sideline."
120b: k=1
See: Small three-player formations occupy the field, each arranged in an L within a tight square zone, leaving one corner position vacant.
Do: A ball of the team's color is kicked through the empty position and travels diagonally away from the formation, marking each square it crosses, until it exits the field.
Grid: Field unchanged in size. Players remain in position. Ball trail marked from the gap to the field boundary.
We need to infer rule. Description: small three-player formations occupy field, each arranged in an L within a tight square zone, leaving one corner position vacant. That's like three same-colored cells forming an L shape (2x2 block missing one corner). The ball of team's color is kicked through the empty position and travels diagonally away from formation, marking each square it crosses, until it exits field. Players remain. So we need to find each L-shaped trio of same color, identify the missing corner (the empty cell adjacent orthogonally to both other cells). Then from that empty cell, extend a diagonal line outward away from the L (direction away from the three cells) marking with same color? In example, color W (maroon) forms L shapes. Let's examine example input and output. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate W positions. Row indices 0-9, col 0-9. Input: Row1 (0): all . Row2 (1): cols 3,4 are W (0-index?). Actually row1 index 1: ". . . W W . . . . ." So (1,3) and (1,4) W. Row2 (2): ". . . . W . . . . ." => (2,4) W. Row6 (6): ". . . W . . . . . ." => (6,3) W. Row7 (7): ". . . W W . . . . ." => (7,3),(7,4) W. Thus we have two L shapes? Let's see: At top left cluster: cells (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) form an L missing (2,3). That's a 2x2 block rows1-2 cols3-4 missing bottom-left. So empty corner is (2,3). According to rule, ball travels diagonally away from formation. Which direction? The empty corner is bottom-left of the L (since missing). The three cells occupy top row (both), and right column (bottom). So the L shape orientation: missing corner is bottom-left, so the diagonal away would be down-left? Actually from empty position, away from the three cells means direction opposite to where the three cells are relative to the empty. The three cells are to the up and right of the empty. So away would be down-left (southwest). Let's see output: they added W's along diagonal from (2,3) down-left to edge. Output shows new W's at positions: Let's list output W coordinates. Output rows: Row1 (0): none. Row2 (1): same as input (1,3),(1,4) plus also at (1,9)? Wait output row1? Actually output row1 (0) unchanged. Row2 (1): ". . . W W . . . . W" => (1,3),(1,4),(1,9) W. Row3 (2): ". . . . W . . . W ." => (2,4),(2,8) W. Row4 (3): ". . W . . . . W . ." => (3,2),(3,7) W. Row5 (4): ". W . . . . W . . ." => (4,1),(4,6) W. Row6 (5): "W . . . . W . . . ." => (5,0),(5,5) W. Row7 (6): ". . . W . . . . . ." => (6,3) unchanged. Row8 (7): ". . . W W . . . . ." => (7,3),(7,4) unchanged. Rows9-10 none. So new W's appear forming a diagonal line from (2,3) down-left to (5,0). Indeed (2,3) is empty originally, but output does not have W at (2,3). Wait they didn't fill the empty cell itself? The description says ball kicked through empty position and travels diagonally away, marking each square it crosses, until exits. Does it mark the empty cell? Possibly not; maybe starts from the empty cell and moves one step diagonally, marking each square it ... [4652 chars truncated]
"A storm cloud with a breach in its wall funnels wind through the opening, carrying colored rain diagonally across the landscape until it dissipates at the horizon."
120b: k=1
See: Dense three-cell cloud formations sit against a dark sky, each shaped like an L within a square frame, with one corner open to the air.
Do: Through each cloud's opening, a streak of colored precipitation is blown diagonally outward, depositing one raindrop per cell until the streak reaches the sky's edge.
Grid: Sky dimensions same as input. Clouds unchanged. Rain trail extends from the open corner diagonally to the grid boundary.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Dense three-cell cloud formations sit against a dark sky, each shaped like an L within a square frame, with one corner open to the air. Through each cloud's opening, a streak of colored precipitation is blown diagonally outward, depositing one raindrop per cell until the streak reaches the sky's edge. Grid details: Sky dimensions same as input. Clouds unchanged. Rain trail extends from the open corner diagonally to the grid boundary." Interpretation: Input has L-shaped clusters of same color? In example 1, color W (maroon) forms L shapes? Let's examine input example 1 grid 10x10. I'll map coordinates (row, col). Input has W at positions: (1,3),(1,4) (0-index? Let's use 0-index rows). Actually row0: all .; row1: columns 3,4 are W. row2: column4? Wait row2: ". . . . W . . . . ." so column4 (0-index) is W. row6: column3 is W. row7: columns3,4 are W. So we have two L shapes? Let's visualize. Rows: 0: .......... 1: ...WW.... 2: ....W.... 3: .......... 4: .......... 5: .......... 6: ...W..... 7: ...WW.... 8: .......... 9: .......... We see an L shape at rows1-2-? Actually shape: at (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L (corner at (1,4) maybe). That's a 2x2 square missing one cell (the lower-left). That's like an L shape with open corner at (2,3) (southwest). Another L shape at rows6-7: (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) forms L rotated? That's shape with corner at (6,4) missing? Actually cells: (6,3) top left, (7,3) below, (7,4) right of bottom. That's L shape with open corner at (6,4) (northeast). So two L shapes oriented differently. Now output adds new W cells forming diagonal lines from the open corner outward to edge. Let's see output positions of W beyond original. Output grid rows: 0: .......... 1: ...WW....W (W at col8) 2: ....W...W. (W at col8) 3: ..W...W.. (row3 col2 and col7) 4: .W...W... (row4 col1 and col6) 5: W...W.... (row5 col0 and col5) 6: ...W..... (row6 col3 unchanged) 7: ...WW.... (row7 col3,4 unchanged) 8: .......... 9: .......... So new W cells form a diagonal line from open corner of first L (which open corner is at (2,3)?) Let's compute: first L open corner at (2,3) (row2 col3). In output, there is a W at (3,2), (4,1), (5,0) - that's a diagonal going down-left (southwest) from (2,3) to edge. Indeed those are new W cells. Second L open corner at (6,4) (row6 col4). In output, there is a W at (5,5), (4,6), (3,7), (2,8), (1,8)?? Wait (1,8) is row1 col8, yes. That's diagonal up-right (northeast) from (6,4) to edge. So rule: For each L-shaped cluster of same color (size 3 cells forming a 2x2 missing one corner), identify the missing corner (the open corner). Then extend a line of that same color diagonally outward from that missing corner towards the grid edge, adding cells until hitting edge. Thus test input has color A (azure) forming L shapes. Need to locate them. Test input grid 10x10: Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . A . . . . . 3: . . . A A . . . . . 4: . . ... [11070 chars truncated]
"A building missing one cornerstone casts its shadow through the gap, the dark silhouette stretching diagonally across the plaza until it meets the city wall."
120b: k=1
See: Small L-shaped structures stand on an empty plaza, each occupying three corners of a square foundation with one cornerstone absent.
Do: Light shining through each missing cornerstone projects a colored shadow diagonally outward from the gap, extending one block at a time to the plaza's edge.
Grid: Plaza dimensions preserved. Buildings untouched. Shadow cells added along the diagonal from the missing corner to the boundary.
We need to infer rule. Description: L-shaped structures occupy three corners of a square foundation with one cornerstone absent. So each L shape is three cells forming a 2x2 block missing one corner. The missing corner is the gap. The rule: project a colored shadow diagonally outward from the gap, extending one block at a time to the plaza's edge. So for each L shape, we identify the missing cell (the corner not occupied). Then from that missing cell, go along the diagonal direction outward (presumably away from the L shape) until hitting edge, filling cells with same color as the L shape? In example, color is W (maroon). Input has W cells forming L shapes. Output adds W cells along diagonal from missing corner to edge. Let's examine example 1 to confirm. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate W cells. Rows (0-index). I'll map. Row0 all . Row1: columns 3,4 are W (two adjacent horizontally). Row2: column4 is W (vertical). So that's a 2x2 block at rows1-2 cols3-4 missing top-left? Let's see positions: (1,3),(1,4),(2,4). Missing (2,3). That's an L shape missing bottom-left? Actually shape: cells at (1,3) top-left of block, (1,4) top-right, (2,4) bottom-right. Missing (2,3) bottom-left. So missing corner is (2,3). Diagonal outward from missing corner: which direction? The missing corner is bottom-left of the 2x2 block. The diagonal outward would be down-left? Since missing corner is at bottom-left, outward direction likely continues that same direction away from the L shape, i.e., down-left (southwest). From (2,3) go to (3,2),(4,1),(5,0) until edge. In output, we see new W at (1,9?) Wait need to check. Output grid: Row1 (index1) same as input plus extra W at column9? Let's list output rows. Row0 all . Row1: ". . . W W . . . . W" So W at col3,4 (same) and also at col9. That's far right, not down-left. Row2: ". . . . W . . . W ." W at col4 (same) and col8. Row3: ". . W . . . . W . ." W at col2 and col7. Row4: ". W . . . . W . . ." W at col1 and col6. Row5: "W . . . . W . . . ." W at col0 and col5. Row6: ". . . W . . . . . ." W at col3 (same as input row6 col3? Wait input row6 had W at col3? Let's check input row6: ". . . W . . . . . ." yes same. Row7: ". . . W W . . . . ." same as input. Rows8-9 unchanged. So new W cells form a diagonal line from (2,3)?? Actually we see new W cells at positions: (1,9), (2,8), (3,7), (4,6), (5,5), (5,0?) Wait (5,0) is also new. Let's list all new W cells not present in input: Input W positions: (1,3),(1,4),(2,4),(6,3),(7,3),(7,4). That's it. Output adds: (1,9),(2,8),(3,2),(3,7),(4,1),(4,6),(5,0),(5,5). That's eight new cells. Observe pattern: There are two L shapes? Actually there is also another L shape at rows6-7 columns3-4 similar orientation? Let's examine rows6-7: row6 col3 W, row7 col3 W, row7 col4 W. That's same orientation missing (6,4) top-right? Wait cells: (6,3) top-left, (7,3) bottom-left, (7,4) bottom-right. Missing (6,4) top-right. So missing corner is (6,4). Diagonal outward from missing corner w ... [4370 chars truncated]
"A fortress with a breached wall fires signal flares through the opening, each flare arcing one step further into the darkness until the last one lands beyond the battlefield."
120b: k=1
See: Small three-cell fortifications hold positions on a dark battlefield, each forming an L-shape with one defensive corner exposed.
Do: From each breach, a chain of signal flares launches diagonally outward through the gap, one per cell, until the volley reaches the edge of the map.
Grid: Battlefield same size. Fortifications intact. Flare markers placed along the diagonal from breach to boundary.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Small three-cell fortifications hold positions on a dark battlefield, each forming an L-shape with one defensive corner exposed. From each breach, a chain of signal flares launches diagonally outward through the gap, one per cell, until the volley reaches the edge of the map. Grid details: Battlefield same size. Fortifications intact. Flare markers placed along the diagonal from breach to boundary." Interpretation: Input has L-shaped clusters of a color (maybe W in example). They are three cells forming an L shape (2 cells orthogonal plus corner). The "defensive corner exposed" means the corner cell is the breach? Actually L shape: three cells: two adjacent orthogonal forming a corner, plus one extra cell extending from one of the arms? Wait typical L of 3 cells: like a 2x2 block missing one cell, shape like a corner. The "defensive corner exposed" maybe the missing cell? The breach is the gap (the missing cell) where diagonal line goes outward. In example 1, input has W cells forming L shapes? Let's map coordinates. Grid 10x10. Let's list W positions: Row1 index0? Actually rows 0-9. Row1 (index0): none. Row2 (index1): columns 3,4 (0-index) have W W (two adjacent horizontally). Row2 also maybe part of L. Row3 (index2): column4 has W (vertical continuation). So we have a shape: (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L shape with corner at (1,4) maybe? That's three cells: a 2x2 missing (2,3). The missing cell (2,3) is the "breach" (gap). Diagonal outward through the gap: from missing cell, go diagonally outward (which direction?). The gap is at (2,3). Diagonal outward likely away from the L shape? Which direction? The L shape orientation: cells at (1,3) left, (1,4) top right, (2,4) bottom right. The missing cell (2,3) is bottom left of the 2x2 block. The diagonal outward from that missing cell would be down-left? Actually from missing cell to outside of shape maybe direction away from the occupied cells. The occupied cells are up, right, and up-right relative to missing cell. The empty diagonal direction is down-left (southwest). So we would place flare markers (maybe W?) along that diagonal until edge. In output, we see new W's added along diagonal from (2,3) down-left: positions (3,2), (4,1), (5,0). Indeed output shows W at (3,2) row3 col2? Let's check output: Row3 (index2) output: ". . . . W . . . . W ." Wait row2? Let's list output rows. Output rows: 0: all . 1: ". . . W W . . . . W" 2: ". . . . W . . . W ." 3: ". . W . . . . W . ." 4: ". W . . . . W . . ." 5: "W . . . . W . . . ." 6: ". . . W . . . . . ." 7: ". . . W W . . . . ." 8: all . 9: all . Now compare to input W positions: same as before plus new ones. New W's appear at (1,9) row1 col9, (2,8), (3,2), (3,7), (4,1), (4,6), (5,0), (5,5). Let's map each L shape. We have other W clusters: At row6 (index6) column3? Input row6 (index6) ". . . W . . . . . ." that's (6,3). Row7 (index7) ". . . W W . . . . ." positions (7,3),(7,4). That's another L shape: ... [5593 chars truncated]
"An actor exits through the missing wing of the stage set, leaving a trail of spotlight pools stretching diagonally into the darkness beyond the proscenium."
120b: fail
See: Three-piece stage set fragments form L-shapes on a dark stage, each missing one panel from a square arrangement.
Do: A spotlight follows the invisible actor's exit through the gap, casting pools of matching color diagonally outward until the light spills off the stage entirely.
Grid: Stage dimensions unchanged. Set pieces remain. Spotlight pools mark the diagonal from the gap to the stage edge.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has some W (maroon) forming L shapes missing one cell? Let's view example1 input grid 10x10. Let's map coordinates (row, col). Input has W at (1,3),(1,4) (0-index?). Actually rows start 0. Row1 (index1) has W W at cols3,4. Row2 has W at col4. Row6 has W at col3. Row7 has W W at cols3,4. So there are two L shapes? Let's visualize: first L shape top-left? At rows1-2 and row6? Wait. Positions: (1,3),(1,4) (2,4) (6,3) (7,3),(7,4) These are two separate L shapes: one at rows1-2 columns3-4 (a 2x2 square missing bottom-left? Actually square would be (1,3),(1,4),(2,3),(2,4). Missing (2,3). So L shape missing bottom-left cell. Second L shape at rows6-7 columns3-4: positions (6,3),(7,3),(7,4). That's also missing top-right? Square would be (6,3),(6,4),(7,3),(7,4). Missing (6,4). So L shape missing top-right cell. Thus each L shape missing one cell (the gap). The rule: from the gap, cast diagonal outward matching color (W) until edge. In output, we see additional W's along diagonal from each gap outward. Let's locate gaps: first L missing (2,3). In output, there are new W's at (2,9?) Wait output shows many W's along diagonal from that gap? Let's list output W positions beyond original. Output rows: Row1 (index1) same as input? Row1: . . . W W . . . . W (extra W at col9) Row2: . . . . W . . . W . (extra W at col8) Row3: . . W . . . . W . . (extra W at col2 and col7) Row4: . W . . . . W . . . (extra W at col1 and col6) Row5: W . . . . W . . . . (extra W at col0 and col5) Row6: . . . W . . . . . . (same as input) Row7: . . . W W . . . . . (same) Thus new W's form a diagonal line from the gap (2,3) down-left? Actually gap at (2,3). The new W's appear at (5,0) (row5 col0) etc. That's down-left direction (southwest) from gap to edge. Also there is a diagonal up-right? Let's see extra at (0,9) etc. That's up-right direction (north-east) from gap to edge. Indeed from gap (2,3) moving up-right: (1,4) already W, (0,5) is . but output shows no W there. Wait output row0 col5 is . . Actually row0 unchanged. Up-right from (2,3): (1,4) already W, (0,5) would be . but not filled. However we see W at (1,9) far right? That's not along same diagonal. Let's compute other diagonal: from gap (2,3) moving down-left: (3,2) output has W at (3,2) yes row3 col2. (4,1) W at (4,1). (5,0) W at (5,0). Good. From gap moving up-right: (1,4) already W, (0,5) not filled. But maybe they continue beyond existing shape until edge, but stop when encountering another shape? Not. Now second L shape missing (6,4). Gap at (6,4). Output shows new W's? Let's see extra W's maybe at (5,5) etc. Output row5 col5 has W (yes). That's up-left from gap? Actually from (6,4) moving up-left: (5,3) is . but output row5 col3 is .? row5 col3 is . (since row5 is "W . . . . W . . . .") col3 is index3 '.' . Not W. Wait row5 col5 is W (col5). That's up-right? From (6,4) up-right: (5,5) yes W. Then (4,6) would be? row4 col6 is . (row4: ". W . . . . W . . .") col6 is W? A ... [10288 chars truncated]
"A vine growing in three corners of a trellis square reaches through the empty corner and sends a runner diagonally across the garden until it hits the fence."
120b: k=1
See: Small L-shaped plantings of colored flowers occupy three cells of square plots on bare soil, each with one corner of the plot unplanted.
Do: From the bare corner, a runner of matching flowers extends diagonally outward away from the planted mass, sprouting one bloom per cell until it reaches the garden's border.
Grid: Garden dimensions same. Original plantings unchanged. Runner blooms added along the diagonal to the edge.
We need to infer rule. From description: L-shaped plantings of colored flowers occupy three cells of square plots, each with one corner of the plot unplanted. So shape is like a 2x2 block missing one corner (the bare corner). The runner extends diagonally outward from the bare corner, adding same color cells along diagonal to edge. In example 1: Input has W's forming L shapes? Let's map coordinates. 10x10 grid. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input W positions: Row1 (index1): cols3,4 (since . . . W W . . . . .) => (1,3),(1,4) Row2: col4 (2,4) Row5: none Row6: col3 (6,3) Row7: cols3,4 (7,3),(7,4) These look like two L shapes? Let's see first L: cells (1,3),(1,4),(2,4) forms an L missing corner at (2,3) which is bare. That's a 2x2 block rows1-2 cols3-4 missing (2,3). So bare corner at (2,3). Runner should extend diagonally outward from bare corner away from planted mass. The planted mass is the three cells; the missing corner is opposite the mass? For L shape, the missing corner is at (2,3). The direction away from planted mass would be down-left? Let's think: The L shape occupies top row (1,3),(1,4) and right column (2,4). The missing corner is bottom-left of the 2x2 block. The planted mass is at top and right sides; the diagonal outward from missing corner away from mass would be down-left direction (southwest) from (2,3). Indeed output shows additional W's along that diagonal: Let's check output W positions beyond original. Output grid: Row1 same as input (no new). Row2: same plus W at col9? Wait output row1 index0? Let's list output W positions: Row1 (0): none Row2 (1): cols3,4 (same) plus col9? Actually output row1 line: ". . . . . . . . . ." row0. Row1 (index1): ". . . W W . . . . . W" So there is a W at col9 (index9). That's far right, not diagonal from missing corner. Hmm maybe other L shape. Row2 (index2): ". . . . W . . . . W ." => W at col4 (same) and col8. Row3 (index3): ". . W . . . . W . ." => W at col2 and col7. Row4 (index4): ". W . . . . W . . ." => W at col1 and col6. Row5 (index5): "W . . . . W . . . ." => W at col0 and col5. Row6 (index6): ". . . W . . . . . ." => original (6,3) unchanged. Row7 (index7): ". . . W W . . . . ." unchanged. So we see a diagonal line of W from (5,0) up to (1,9) maybe? Let's map: positions (5,0), (4,1), (3,2), (2,3?) Actually (2,3) is not W (input had no W there). Wait (2,3) is empty. But output has W at (2,8) not (2,3). Hmm maybe there are two L shapes: second L shape at rows6-7 cols3-4 missing corner at (6,4)? Let's examine second L: cells (6,3),(7,3),(7,4) missing (6,4). Bare corner at (6,4). Diagonal outward from (6,4) away from mass would be down-right (south-east) direction (since mass is up and left). Extending to border would produce W at (8,5),(9,6) maybe? But output does not have those; output unchanged for rows8-9. So maybe the rule is: For each L shape, extend a line of same color from the missing corner outward in the direction opposite the occupied cells (i ... [5260 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains several distinct clusters (connected components) of grey (X) cells against a black (.) background. Each cluster varies in size, meaning the number of cells it contains. Clusters can be any shape — L-shapes, straight lines, squares, etc. — and are scattered across the grid without overlapping.
Do: 1. Identify every connected component of grey (X) cells in the input grid, using 4-connectivity (up, down, left, right — not diagonal). 2. Count the number of cells in each connected component. 3. Recolor each component based on its size: cells belonging to a 2-cell cluster become green (G), cells belonging to a 3-cell cluster become red (R), and cells belonging to a 4-cell cluster become blue (B). 4. All black (.) background cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly (typically 10x10). The background is black (.). The only non-background elements are clusters of grey cells in the input, which become green, red, or blue in the output depending on cluster size. No cells are added or removed; only colors change.
"A naturalist classifies unknown species by the size of their herds."
120b: k=1
See: Scattered across a dark landscape, small herds of mysterious grey animals huddle together. Some travel in pairs, some in trios, and some in groups of four. Each herd keeps to itself, never touching another.
Do: A naturalist arrives to catalog the wildlife. She identifies each herd by counting its members, then paints them with a tag color revealing their species: the smallest pairs share one color, the middle-sized trios another, and the largest bands of four a third. The empty wilderness stays untouched.
Grid: The dark terrain remains as-is. Every grey animal receives its species tag — a new coat color determined solely by how many companions share its herd. No creatures appear or vanish; only their coats change.
We need to infer rule: In example, input has X (grey) representing animals. They form clusters (connected components) of size 2,3,4? Let's examine example1 input grid 10x10. I'll map coordinates. Let's list X positions: Row2 (0-index? but easier). Let's index rows 0-9. Row0: none Row1: none Row2: columns 1,2,3 are X X X (a horizontal line of 3). Also column7 is X. Row3: column7 X. Row4: none Row5: columns3,4 X X (two adjacent horizontally) Row6: column3 X Row7: column7 X Row8: columns1,2 X X ; column5 X ; columns7,8,9 X X X (three contiguous) Row9: columns1,2 X X Now clusters: Need to consider adjacency? Likely orthogonal (4-direction) connectivity. Let's identify clusters. Cluster A: row2 col1-3 (three X contiguous horizontally). That's size 3. Cluster B: row2 col7, row3 col7, row7 col7, row8 col7-9? Wait connectivity: row2 col7 adjacent to row3 col7 (vertical) => same cluster. Row3 col7 adjacent to row4? none. Row7 col7 is far (row difference 4) not connected because there is gap rows4-6 no X at col7. So separate cluster. Row8 col7-9 are three X contiguous horizontally, but they are at row8, col7 adjacent vertically to row7 col7 (since row7 col7 X). So they belong to same cluster as row2 col7? Actually there is a gap rows4-6 col7 empty, so not connected. So row7 col7 connects to row8 col7-9, forming cluster size 4? Let's count: row7 col7 (1), row8 col7,8,9 (3) => total 4. Also row2 col7 and row3 col7 are separate cluster size 2? Wait row2 col7 and row3 col7 are adjacent vertically, so cluster size 2. So we have cluster size 2 at rows2-3 col7. Cluster C: row5 col3-4 (two adjacent) size2, plus row6 col3 (adjacent vertically to row5 col3) => that makes size3? Actually row5 col3 adjacent to row6 col3, row5 col4 adjacent to row5 col3. So cluster of three X: positions (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size 3. Cluster D: row8 col1-2 and row9 col1-2: that's a 2x2 block? Actually row8 col1,2 X; row9 col1,2 X. That's four X forming a 2x2 square, size 4. Now output colors: Let's map. Output grid shows at those positions colors: For cluster size 3 (row2 col1-3) output R R R (red). Indeed output row2 col1-3 are R. So size3 -> red. Cluster size 2 (row2-3 col7) output? Row2 col7 in output is G? Wait output row2 col7 is G (green). Row3 col7 is G. So size2 -> green? But also other size2 clusters: row5 col3-4? Output row5 col3-4 are R R (red) actually row5 col3-4 are R R. That's size2 but colored red, not green. Hmm maybe orientation matters? Let's double-check mapping. Hold on: In output row5 col3-4 are R R. In input those are part of cluster size3 (including row6 col3). So cluster size3 gave red. So that matches size3 -> red. Now size2 cluster row2-3 col7 gave green. So size2 -> green? But there is also size2 cluster maybe elsewhere? Let's see other size2 clusters: none else. Size4 clusters: row7-8 col7-9 (size4) output? Row7 col7 is B (blue). Row8 col7-9 are B B B. So size4 -> blue. Size4 cluster row8-9 col1-2 (2x2) output? Row8 ... [4925 chars truncated]
"A cellular biologist stains tissue samples under a microscope, applying different fluorescent dyes depending on how many cells have fused together in each colony."
120b: k=3
See: A dark slide dotted with pale, unstained cell colonies of varying sizes.
Do: Apply the appropriate fluorescent marker to each colony based on the number of cells it contains. Smaller fusions glow one hue, mid-sized another, and the largest yet another.
Grid: Grid dimensions match the input. Black background remains. Each pale colony is recolored with its size-appropriate fluorescent dye.
We need to infer rule. From description: dark slide (black background) with pale colonies (grey X?) Actually input uses X for grey cells (pale colonies). Need to recolor each colony based on its size: small -> one hue, medium -> another, large -> another. In examples, X cells become colored B,R,G etc depending on size. Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 10x10. Identify clusters of X (connected? likely orthogonal adjacency). Determine sizes and mapping to colors. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. I'll list X positions: Row2: col1,2,3 (three contiguous horizontally). Also col7 (single). Row3: col7 (single). Row5: col3,4 (two). Row6: col3 (single). Row7: col7 (single). Row8: col1,2 (two), col5,6,7 (three). Row9: col1,2 (two). That's all. Now output colors at those positions: Row2 col1-3 become R R R. So size 3 cluster -> R (red). Row2 col7 becomes G. Row3 col7 becomes G. So single cell cluster? Actually col7 at row2 and row3 are vertically adjacent? Row2 col7 is X, row3 col7 is X, they are adjacent vertically, forming a cluster of size 2. Wait row2 col7 is X, row3 col7 is X. In output both are G. So size 2 cluster -> G (green). Row5 col3-4 become R R (size 2? Actually they are adjacent horizontally, size 2 cluster, but colored R not G. Hmm conflict. Let's double-check: Row5 col3,4 are X's. Output row5 col3,4 are R R. So size 2 cluster colored R. But earlier size 2 cluster (row2-3 col7) colored G. So maybe connectivity includes diagonal? Let's examine cluster definitions. Maybe clusters are defined by connectivity of X cells (including diagonals). Let's compute clusters with 8-connectivity. Check cluster containing row2 col1-3: they are adjacent horizontally, also maybe other X near? No other X adjacent diagonally? Row3 col2? Row3 col2 is '.' (no). So cluster size 3. Cluster containing row2 col7 and row3 col7: also row2 col6? row2 col6 is '.'; row3 col6 '.'; row1 col7 '.'; row1 col6 '.'; row3 col8 '.'; So only those two cells, size 2. Cluster row5 col3-4: also row6 col3 is X (row6 col3). That's vertically adjacent (row5 col3 to row6 col3). Also row5 col4 adjacent to row6 col4? row6 col4 is '.'; row6 col3 also adjacent to row5 col4 diagonally? That's diagonal adjacency (row6 col3 to row5 col4). If using 8-connectivity, then row5 col3-4 and row6 col3 are all connected, forming size 3 cluster. Indeed output: row5 col3-4 are R R, row6 col3 is R. So size 3 cluster -> R (consistent with earlier size 3 cluster also R). Good. Cluster row7 col7: check adjacency to row8 col5-7? Row8 col5,6,7 are X. Row7 col7 is above row8 col7 (vertical adjacency) so they are connected, also row8 col6 diagonal etc. So cluster includes row7 col7, row8 col5,6,7, row9 col1,2? Wait row8 col5-7 are three cells, row9 col1,2 are far away not connected. Row8 col5 adjacent to row8 col6 horizontally, etc. So cluster size = row7 col7 (1) + row8 col5,6,7 (3) = 4 cells. Output: row7 col7 is B, row8 col5,6,7 are B B B. So size 4 cluster -> B (blue). R ... [9398 chars truncated]
"An astronomer classifies star clusters in a dark sky survey by their membership count, rendering small pairs in one false color, triplets in another, and quadruplets in a third."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky field with faint grey star clusters of various sizes.
Do: Count the stars in each cluster and render them in the false-color palette assigned to that membership tier.
Grid: Same sky dimensions. Empty space stays dark. Each cluster glows in its membership-count color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has '.' black and 'X' grey stars. Output replaces X clusters with colors based on cluster size (membership tier). In example, clusters of X of certain sizes become R, G, B etc. Let's analyze example 1. Input coordinates (10x10). Let's map clusters of X (connected? likely orthogonal adjacency). Determine cluster sizes. I'll label positions (row, col) 0-index. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => X at (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally => cluster A size 3. Also X at (2,7) isolated? maybe adjacent to others later. 3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (3,7) adjacent vertically to (2,7) => cluster B includes (2,7),(3,7) size 2. 4: all . 5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => X at (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally => cluster C size 2? also maybe connect to others later. 6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => X at (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => cluster C expands: includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). Also (5,4) not adjacent to (6,3) diagonally not count. So cluster C size 3? Actually (5,4) is separate from (6,3) not orthogonal. So cluster C currently: (5,3),(5,4) size2, plus (6,3) adjacent to (5,3) => size3. 7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (7,7) adjacent vertically to (3,7)? No gap rows 4,5,6 are empty at col7. So separate cluster D size1. 8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => X at (8,1),(8,2) adjacent => cluster E size2 maybe connect to others? also X at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous horizontally => cluster F size3. 9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => X at (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => cluster E expands: includes (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) size4. Now output grid: Let's see colors. Rows output: 2: ". R R R . . . G . ." => positions (2,1-3) turned R. So cluster size3 -> R. Good. (2,7) turned G. So cluster B size2? Wait B size2 turned G. So size2 -> G? Let's check other size2 clusters. Cluster C size3 turned R? Let's see output rows 5,6. Row5 output: ". . . R R . . . . ." positions (5,3),(5,4) are R. So cluster C size3 gave R (makes sense). Row6 output: ". . . R . . . . . ." position (6,3) is R as part of same cluster size3. So size3 -> R. Cluster D size1 at (7,7) output row7: ". . . . . . . B . ." => B at (7,7). So size1 -> B. Cluster E size4 at (8,1,2,9,1,2) output rows8,9: row8 output ". B B . . . B B B ." positions (8,1),(8,2) are B (size4 cluster gave B). Also (8,6,7,8) are B B B (cluster F size3? Wait cluster F size3 turned B? Let's see). Row9 output ". B B . . . . . . ." positions (9,1),(9,2) are B. So cluster E size4 -> B. So size4 also B. Cluster F size3 (positions (8,6-8)) output B B B (size3 gave B? but earlier size3 gave R). Hmm conflict. Let's double-check cluster identification: maybe connectivity includes diagonal? If diagonal counts, clusters may be larger. Check cluster F: (8,6),(8,7),(8,8). Are there any adjacent X's diagonally? (7,7) is X (cluster D). Diagonal adjacency could connect them, making a large ... [7206 chars truncated]
"A harbor master paints mooring buoys based on how many boats are rafted together at each anchorage — pairs get one signal color, triplets another, and groups of four a third."
120b: fail
See: Dark open water with clusters of grey vessels rafted together at scattered anchorages.
Do: Count the boats in each raft-up and repaint them in the harbor signal color for that raft size.
Grid: Same waterway. Open water stays dark. Each group of boats takes on its raft-size signal color.
We need to infer rule. Input grid with '.' black background, 'X' grey vessels. Need to group connected X's (probably orthogonal adjacency?) and recolor each group based on its size (raft size) to a specific color mapping. From example 1: Input shows X clusters. Output shows R, G, B colors. We need to map size to color. Let's analyze example 1. Let's label coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input example1 grid 10x10. I'll list X positions: Row2: columns1,2,3 (three contiguous horizontally). Also column7 (single). Row3: column7 (single). Row5: columns3,4 (two adjacent). Row6: column3 (single). Row7: column7 (single). Row8: columns1,2 (two adjacent) and columns5,6,7 (three adjacent). Row9: columns1,2 (two adjacent). Now need to see output colors at those positions. Output row2 (index2): columns1,2,3 are R R R. So size 3 cluster becomes R. column7 is G (since output row2 col7 = G). So single X becomes G? Wait there is also a single X at row3 col7 becomes G (output row3 col7 = G). So single cluster size 1 maps to G. Row5: columns3,4 become R R (size 2 cluster becomes R? but earlier size 3 also R). Let's check: row5 col3,4 are R R. So size 2 also R. Row6 col3 is R (size1? but we already said size1 is G). Wait row6 col3 corresponds to input X at (6,3) which is part of same cluster? Actually check adjacency: (5,3) and (5,4) are X's. (6,3) is below (5,3) vertically adjacent, so they are part of same cluster of size 3? Let's see: positions: (5,3), (5,4), (6,3). That's three cells connected (orthogonal). So cluster size 3 again -> R. Good. Row7 col7 is X, output row7 col7 = B (since row7 output shows B at col7). Wait row7 output line: ". . . . . . . B . ." yes B at col7. So size1 cluster becomes B? But earlier size1 at (2,7) became G. So maybe there are different colors based on something else like orientation? Let's examine other size1 clusters: (2,7) and (3,7) are adjacent vertically? Actually (2,7) and (3,7) are vertically adjacent, so they form a size2 cluster! Wait we misread: Input row2 col7 is X, row3 col7 is X, they are adjacent vertically, so they form a cluster of size 2. Output shows G at both positions (row2 col7 G, row3 col7 G). So size2 cluster maps to G. Now size1 clusters: (7,7) is isolated? Check adjacency: any other X near? Row8 col5-7 cluster includes (8,5),(8,6),(8,7). That's separate. So (7,7) is isolated size1 -> B. Now cluster at row8 col1,2 (size2) and row9 col1,2 (size2) are vertically adjacent? Row8 col1,2 are X, row9 col1,2 are X, making a 2x2 block of size4? Actually positions: (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) all X, they are all orthogonally connected, forming size4 cluster. Output row8 col1,2 are B B, row9 col1,2 are B B. So size4 cluster maps to B. Cluster at row8 col5,6,7 (size3) output row8 col5,6,7 are B B B. So size3 cluster maps to B? Wait earlier size3 cluster (row2 col1-3) mapped to R. So different colors for size3 depending on something else. Let's list clusters with sizes and output colors: Cluster A: (2,1-3) ... [5989 chars truncated]
"A circuit board inspector color-codes solder blobs based on how many pads each blob bridges — dual bridges get one diagnostic color, triple bridges another, and quad bridges a third."
120b: fail
See: A dark PCB with grey solder blobs of varying sizes bridging different numbers of pads.
Do: Count the pads each solder bridge connects and highlight it in the diagnostic color for that bridge count.
Grid: Same board layout. Clean substrate stays dark. Each solder blob is highlighted in its bridge-count diagnostic color.
We need to infer rule. Input grid has '.' black background and 'X' grey blobs. Output replaces each X with a color based on the size of the connected component (bridge count). In example, we see components of X of various sizes, each colored differently: R, G, B etc. Let's analyze example 1. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate X components. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". X X X . . . X . ." positions: (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally => component size 3. Also (2,7) isolated? check adjacency orthogonal? Usually connectivity is orthogonal (up/down/left/right). (2,7) isolated (no adjacent X). So size 1 component. 3: ". . . . . . . X . ." (3,7) adjacent to (2,7) vertically => component size 2 (positions (2,7),(3,7)). Also maybe more? check later rows. 4: all . 5: ". . . X X . . . . ." (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally => component size 2. 6: ". . . X . . . . . ." (6,3) adjacent to (5,3) vertically => component size 3? Actually (5,3) already part of size2 component; adding (6,3) makes component of size 3 (positions (5,3),(5,4),(6,3)). Wait (5,4) not adjacent to (6,3) diagonally not count. So component includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size 3. 7: ". . . . . . . X . ." (7,7) adjacent to (3,7)? No far. Check adjacency to (2,7) etc: (7,7) not adjacent to any X above (6,7) is '.'; So isolated size1. 8: ". X X . . . X X X ." positions: (8,1),(8,2) adjacent => component size? also (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous horizontally => component size 3. Are they connected to other rows? Row7 col? (7,1) '.'; (7,2) '.'; (7,6) '.'; (7,7) X at (7,7) but that's separate component size1 earlier. So (8,6-8) size3 component. 9: ". X X . . . . . . ." positions (9,1),(9,2) adjacent horizontally => component size 2, also adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => they connect, making larger component: combine (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) => size 4. Now we have components sizes: - size3 component at (2,1-3) => output shows R at those positions. Indeed output row2 col1-3 are R. So size3 maps to R (red). - size2 component (2,7)+(3,7) => output shows G at (2,7) and (3,7) are G. So size2 maps to G (green). - size3 component (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) => output shows R at (5,3),(5,4) and (6,3) is R. Yes. - size1 component (7,7) => output shows B at (7,7) is B (blue). So size1 maps to B. - size3 component (8,6-8) => output shows B at (8,6-8) are B? Wait output row8 (index8) shows "B B B" at columns 6-8? Let's check output row8: ". B B . . . B B B ."? Actually given output row8 (row index8) is ". B B . . . B B B .". Let's verify: Output lines: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . R R R . . . G . . Row3: . . . . . . . G . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . R R . . . . . Row6: . . . R . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . . . B . . Row8: . B B . . . B B B . Row9: . B B . . . . . . . So at row8 col1,2 are B (size? those are part of size4 component). So size4 maps to B? Wait earlier size1 ... [7337 chars truncated]
"An oracle reads scattered bone fragments on a dark cloth, divining their meaning by how many shards lie touching — each omen size channels a different divine patron, whose sacred color then illuminates the bones."
120b: fail
See: A dark divination cloth with clusters of pale bone fragments of varying group sizes.
Do: Count the touching shards in each cluster to determine which deity claims the omen, then let that patron's sacred color suffuse the bones.
Grid: Same cloth. Empty cloth stays dark. Each bone cluster glows with its patron deity's color.
We need to infer rule. Input uses '.' black and 'X' grey. Output replaces X clusters with colors based on cluster size? In example1, we see clusters of X in input, output shows colors R,G,B etc. Need mapping size->color. Let's analyze example1. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate X positions. Row0 index0? Actually rows 0-9. Row2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => positions (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally size3 cluster? Also (2,7) isolated? Check adjacency: touching shards likely orthogonal (4-neighbor). So cluster A: three X at (2,1-3). cluster B: single X at (2,7). Row3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (3,7) adjacent to (2,7) vertically => same cluster B size2. Row5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally size2 cluster C. Row6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => cluster C now size3? also adjacent to (5,4)? (6,3) adjacent to (5,3) only. So cluster C includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) size3. Row7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (7,7) isolated? check adjacency to (3,7) far away, not connected. So new cluster D size1. Row8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => (8,1),(8,2) adjacent size2 cluster E? also (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous horizontally size3 cluster F. Row9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => cluster E size4? Actually (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) forms 2x2 block size4. Now output colors: Row2 output: ". R R R . . . G . ." => positions (2,1-3) turned R. So cluster size3 -> R. Row2 col7 output G (position (2,7)) turned G. cluster B size2? Actually B includes (2,7) and (3,7). Output row3 col7 is G as well. So size2 -> G. Row5 output: ". . . R R . . . . ." positions (5,3,4) are R. cluster C size3 -> R again. Row6 output: ". . . R . . . . . ." (6,3) R matches. Row7 output: ". . . . . . . B . ." (7,7) B. cluster D size1 -> B. Row8 output: ". B B . . . B B B ." => (8,1,2) B, (8,6,7,8) B. So cluster E size4 -> B? Wait (8,1,2) are part of cluster E size4 but they are B. cluster F size3 -> B as well? Actually (8,6-8) are size3 cluster F but also B. So both size3 and size4 gave B? But earlier size3 gave R. So maybe color depends on something else like orientation? Let's double-check: cluster F is size3 but output B not R. So rule not just size. Maybe colors correspond to deity based on cluster shape? Let's list clusters and output colors: Cluster A (size3 horizontal line) -> R Cluster C (size3 L shape) -> R Cluster F (size3 horizontal line) -> B (different) Cluster B (size2 vertical line) -> G Cluster D (size1) -> B Cluster E (size4 2x2 block) -> B So colors: R for some clusters, B for others, G for size2 vertical. Maybe mapping based on number of cells in cluster modulo something? Let's see: size3 can be R or B. Need differentiate: maybe based on whether cluster touches border? Cluster A at row2 not border. Cluster C touches row5-6 not border. Cluster F at row8 not border. So not. Maybe based on whether c ... [7112 chars truncated]
"A choreographer assigns costume colors to dancers based on the size of each formation they hold — pairs in one hue, trios in another, quartets in a third — so the audience can read the groupings from afar."
120b: fail
See: A dark stage floor with clusters of dancers (grey) holding various small formations.
Do: Count the dancers in each formation and assign them the costume color designated for that formation size.
Grid: Same stage. Empty floor stays dark. Each dancer group appears in their formation-size costume color.
We need to infer rule. Input has '.' black and 'X' grey (dancers). Output replaces each connected component of X (formation) with a color based on its size (number of X cells). In example 1, we need to map sizes to colors: Let's analyze. Example1 input grid 10x10. Identify clusters of X. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => X at (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally size3 cluster. Also X at (2,7) isolated? maybe adjacent to others later. 3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (3,7) adjacent vertically to (2,7) => cluster size2 (positions (2,7),(3,7)) 4: all . 5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => X at (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally size2 cluster. 6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => X at (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => cluster size3? Actually (5,3) already part of size2 cluster with (5,4). Adding (6,3) makes shape: (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) size3 cluster (connected via orthogonal). So cluster size3. 7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (7,7) adjacent vertically to (3,7)? No gap rows 4,5,6 have no X at col7. So isolated size1 cluster. 8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => X at (8,1),(8,2) adjacent horizontally size2 cluster maybe also connect to others? Not near others. X at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) size3 cluster. 9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => X at (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => cluster size4 (positions (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2)) Now output colors: Corresponding positions: Cluster size3 at (2,1-3) becomes R (red) according to output row2: "R R R". So size3 -> R. Cluster size2 at (2,7),(3,7) becomes G? Output row2 col7 is G, row3 col7 G. So size2 -> G. Cluster size3 (5,3-5,4,6,3) becomes R? Output rows5: "R R" at cols3-4, row6 col3 R. Yes size3 -> R. Cluster size1 at (7,7) becomes B? Output row7 col7 B. So size1 -> B. Cluster size2 at (8,1-2) becomes B? Output row8 col1-2 B B. Yes size2 -> B? Wait earlier size2 gave G. So conflict. Let's check: maybe orientation matters? Actually (8,1-2) cluster size2 but output shows B B. So size2 can map to B in some cases, G in others. Let's examine other size2 cluster: (5,3-5,4) size2 but part of size3 cluster earlier? Actually (5,3-5,4) were part of size3 cluster after adding (6,3). So not pure size2. Another size2 cluster: (2,7)-(3,7) gave G. So maybe rule: clusters of size2 that are vertical (stacked) become G, horizontal become B? Let's see (8,1-2) horizontal size2 -> B. (2,7)-(3,7) vertical size2 -> G. That fits. Now size3 clusters: (2,1-3) horizontal line size3 -> R. (5,3,5,4,6,3) L shape size3 -> R. (8,6-8,8) horizontal size3 -> B? Wait output row8 col6-8 are B B B? Let's check output row8: "B B . . . B B B ." Actually row8 (index8) output: "B B . . . B B B ." Yes at cols6-8 B B B. So size3 horizontal gave B, not R. So not just size. Maybe colors correspond to shape type: line of length 3 horizontal -> R? but we have both horizontal length3 gave R (top) and B (bottom). So maybe orientation re ... [10235 chars truncated]
"A geologist mapping an outcrop codes mineral veins by the number of connected crystal faces exposed — small veins in one map color, medium veins in another, and the thickest veins in a third."
120b: fail
See: A dark rock face with grey mineral veins of varying thickness and extent.
Do: Count the exposed crystal faces in each connected vein and color it according to the geological survey code for that vein size.
Grid: Same outcrop dimensions. Bare rock stays dark. Each vein is rendered in its size-coded survey color.
We need to infer rule. Input grid has '.' black background, 'X' grey veins. Output replaces each connected component (vein) of X with a color based on its size (number of cells). In example, we have components of size? Let's analyze. Example1 input: we need to identify connected components of X (presumably orthogonal adjacency? Likely 4-direction). Then output colors: R, G, B correspond to sizes. Let's map. Example1 input grid 10x10. I'll label coordinates row, col (0-index). Let's list X positions. Row2 (index2): columns 1,2,3 are X X X contiguous horizontally. Also column7 is X. Row3 col7 X. Row5 col3,4 X X. Row6 col3 X. Row7 col7 X. Row8 col1,2 X X, col6,7,8 X X X. Row9 col1,2 X X. Now find components. Component A: the three X at (2,1)(2,2)(2,3) maybe also connected to others? Check adjacency: (2,1) adjacent to (2,2) etc. No other X adjacent orthogonally. So size 3. Component B: (2,7) adjacent to (3,7) (vertical). Also (7,7) is far away not connected. So component size 2? Actually (2,7) and (3,7) are adjacent vertically, size 2. Component C: (5,3)(5,4) adjacent horizontally, also (6,3) below (5,3) vertical adjacency, so component includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size 3. Component D: (7,7) alone? Actually (7,7) row7 col7 X, no adjacent X (row6 col7 is .; row8 col7 is X? row8 col7 is X (since row8 has col6,7,8). Yes row8 col7 X, also row8 col6 X, col8 X. So (7,7) connects to row8 col7. Row8 col6 and col8 also adjacent to row8 col7 horizontally. So component includes (7,7),(8,6),(8,7),(8,8). Also row9 col? row9 col? row9 has X at col1,2 only, not near. So component size 4. Component E: row8 col1,2 and row9 col1,2 form a 2x2 block. That's size 4. Now output colors: Let's see mapping. Component A size3 -> output color? At those positions (2,1-3) output is R R R (row2 col1-3). So size3 => R (red). Component B size2 -> positions (2,7) and (3,7) output: row2 col7 is G, row3 col7 is G. So size2 => G (green). Component C size3 -> positions (5,3)(5,4)(6,3) output: row5 col3-4 are R R, row6 col3 is R. So size3 => R again. Component D size4 -> positions (7,7),(8,6-8) output: row7 col7 is B, row8 col6-8 are B B B. So size4 => B (blue). Component E size4 -> positions (8,1-2) and (9,1-2) output: row8 col1-2 B B, row9 col1-2 B B. So size4 => B. Thus mapping: size 2 -> G, size3 -> R, size4 -> B. Possibly other sizes map to other colors (Y, M, O, A, W) for other sizes. Thus rule: For each connected component of X (4-direction), replace all its cells with a color based on component size according to a code mapping. The mapping likely is: size 1? Not present. size 2 -> G, size3 -> R, size4 -> B. Need to infer mapping for other sizes maybe from other examples (but only one example given). Could be that colors correspond to geological survey code: maybe alphabetical order: B=blue for size 4, G=green for size 2, R=red for size 3. Not obvious. We need to apply to test input. Determine component size ... [4762 chars truncated]
"A chef sorts freshly harvested mushroom clusters by weight, then marinates each batch in a different sauce — the lightest in herb oil, the middling in pepper glaze, the heaviest in dark soy."
120b: k=1
See: A cutting board (black surface) scattered with clusters of raw mushrooms (grey) of varying bunch sizes.
Do: Weigh each connected bunch by counting its pieces, then coat it in the sauce assigned to that weight class.
Grid: Same board layout. Background unchanged. Each mushroom cluster takes on the color of its assigned marinade.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid with '.' black background, 'X' grey mushrooms. Output replaces each connected component of X with a color based on its size (weight class). Need mapping from size to color: In example, we have components of various sizes. Let's analyze example 1. Input coordinates (10x10). Let's label components. I'll map grid indices row0-9, col0-9. Input rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . X X X . . . X . . 3: . . . . . . . X . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: . . . X X . . . . . 6: . . . X . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . X . . 8: . X X . . . X X X . 9: . X X . . . . . . . Let's find components (4-direction connectivity? likely orthogonal). Determine each cluster. Component A: at (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) three X horizontally adjacent. Also check adjacency to others: (3,7) separate. So component size 3. Component B: at (2,7) single X? also (3,7) below adjacent vertically, so they are connected: (2,7) and (3,7) size 2. Component C: at (5,3),(5,4) two X adjacent horizontally size2. Also (6,3) below (5,3) vertical adjacency, so component includes (6,3) making size3? Let's see: (5,3) adjacent to (6,3). So component includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). Are there more? (7,7) separate. So size 3. Component D: at (7,7) single X size1. Component E: at (8,1),(8,2) two X horizontally size2. Also (9,1),(9,2) two X below row9 same columns, they are adjacent vertically to row8? (9,1) adjacent to (8,1) vertical, (9,2) adjacent to (8,2). So component includes (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) size4. Component F: at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three X horizontally size3. Also (8,6) maybe adjacent to (7,7)? diagonal not count. So separate. Now output colors mapping: Component A size3 -> output shows at those positions (2,1-3) are R R R (red). So size3 => red. Component B size2 -> positions (2,7) and (3,7) output: (2,7) G, (3,7) G. So size2 => green. Component C size3 -> positions (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) output: (5,3) R, (5,4) R, (6,3) R. So size3 red again. Component D size1 -> (7,7) output: B (blue). So size1 => blue. Component E size4 -> positions (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) output: (8,1) B, (8,2) B, (9,1) B, (9,2) B. So size4 => blue as well? Wait size1 also blue. So maybe size >=4 also blue? Let's see. Component F size3 -> (8,6-8) output: (8,6) B? Actually output row8: " . B B . . . B B B . " Let's map row8 (index8) output: columns: 0 .,1 B,2 B,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 . So (8,6-8) are B B B (blue). That's size3 but earlier size3 gave red. So inconsistency. Wait maybe we mis-assigned component: maybe (8,6-8) are part of larger component including (7,7) etc? Let's examine adjacency: (7,7) is at row7 col7, which is adjacent orthogonally to (8,7) (row8 col7). Yes vertical adjacency! So component D (size1) actually connects to (8,6-8) via (7,7) to (8,7). So they are same component! Let's recompute. Component D+F: includes (7,7), (8,6),(8,7),(8,8). That's size4? Actually count: (7,7) 1, (8,6) 2, (8,7)3, (8,8)4. S ... [5660 chars truncated]
"An orchestral arranger assigns instrument families to musical phrases based on how many notes each phrase contains — short motifs to one section, medium phrases to another, longer passages to a third."
120b: k=3
See: A blank score (black) with scattered grey note-clusters of different lengths.
Do: Count the notes in each phrase and assign it to the instrument section that owns that phrase length, rewriting it in that section's ink color.
Grid: Same score layout. Silent measures stay black. Each phrase is rewritten in the color of its assigned instrument family.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has black '.' and grey 'X' clusters. Output replaces X with colors B,R,G etc based on phrase length? The description: Count notes in each phrase and assign to instrument section that owns that phrase length, rewriting it in that section's ink color. So each connected cluster of X (maybe orthogonal adjacency) length determines which color to use. Need mapping from length to color: Look at example1. Example1 input clusters: Let's identify clusters of X. Grid 10x10. I'll map coordinates (row, col). Row0 top. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => X at (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally length3 cluster A. Also X at (2,7) isolated length1 cluster B. 3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (3,7) isolated length1 cluster C (adjacent to previous? (2,7) is above, so vertical adjacency => they are same cluster? Yes (2,7) and (3,7) are adjacent vertically, so cluster length2 maybe includes both. So cluster B+C length2. 4: all . 5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => X at (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally length2 cluster D. 6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => X at (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) so same cluster D extends length3? Actually (5,3) and (6,3) vertical adjacency, so cluster includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's 3 cells? Wait (5,4) not adjacent to (6,3) diagonally not count. So cluster includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) total 3 cells but shape L. So length3. 7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => X at (7,7) isolated? Check adjacency: (3,7) far. So new cluster E length1. 8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => X at (8,1),(8,2) adjacent length2 cluster F. Also X at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) length3 cluster G. 9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => X at (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) so cluster F extends length4? Actually (8,1),(8,2) plus (9,1),(9,2) => 4 cells cluster F length4. Now output colors: Let's see mapping. Output rows: Row2: ". R R R . . . G . ." => cells (2,1-3) become R. So cluster length3 (A) -> R (red). Good. Cell (2,7) becomes G? Wait output row2 col7 is G. So cluster B+C length2 becomes G (green). So length2 -> G. Row3 col7 output G as well (consistent). Row5: ". . . R R . . . . ." => (5,3),(5,4) become R. That's part of cluster D length3 -> R again. Row6 col3 output R (consistent). Row7 col7 output B (blue). That's cluster E length1 -> B. Row8 col1,2 output B B (cluster F length4? Wait length4 gave B). Row8 col6-8 output B B B (cluster G length3? but earlier length3 gave R). Actually cluster G length3 gave B? Let's check: output row8 col6-8 are B B B. So length3 can map to either R or B depending maybe instrument family based on something else (maybe orientation?). But earlier length3 cluster A gave R, cluster D gave R, cluster G gave B. So not just length. Maybe mapping based on phrase length to instrument sections: maybe there are three instrument families: red, green, blue correspond to lengths 3,2,1? But we have B for length1, G for length2, R for length3. Then why ... [9022 chars truncated]
"A tournament referee assigns jersey colors to pickup teams based on how many players showed up together — duos get one color, trios another, and quads a third."
120b: fail
See: An empty field (black) with clusters of unassigned players (grey) standing in small groups.
Do: Count the members of each group and issue them the jersey color designated for that squad size.
Grid: Same field. Empty grass stays black. Each group now wears their size-assigned jersey color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input uses '.' black, 'X' grey (unassigned players). Output replaces X groups with colors based on group size. In example, groups of X (connected components) are colored: size 3 -> R? size 2 -> B? size 1 -> G? Let's examine. Example 1 input grid 10x10. Let's locate X positions. Row indices 0-9. Row0: none. Row1: none. Row2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => positions (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally size3 group. Also (2,7) isolated? check adjacency orthogonal? Usually connectivity orthogonal (4-neighbor). (2,7) isolated maybe size1. Row3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (3,7) adjacent vertically to (2,7) => group size2 (positions (2,7),(3,7)). So group size2. Row5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally size2 group. Row6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => group size3? Actually (5,3) already part of size2 group with (5,4). Adding (6,3) makes shape: (5,3)-(5,4) horizontal, (6,3) below (5,3). That's 3 cells connected (via orthogonal). So group size3. Row7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (7,7) isolated? Check adjacency: above (6,7) none, left (7,6) none, right (7,8) none, down (8,7) X? Row8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => positions (8,1),(8,2) group, (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) group. So (7,7) is above (8,7) which is X, so they are connected vertically, making group with (8,6,7,8). Let's map groups. Row8: (8,1),(8,2) adjacent horizontally size2 group. (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous horizontally size3 group. Row9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => (9,1),(9,2) adjacent horizontally and also vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => they connect making larger group of size? (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) = 4 cells. Now also (9,?) none else. Now also (2,1-3) group size3 earlier. Now (5,3-4,6,3) group size3. Now (2,7)-(3,7) group size2. Now (8,6-8,8) group size3. Now (8,1-2,9,1-2) group size4. Now (7,7) part of group with (8,6-8,8) because (7,7) adjacent to (8,7). So that group actually size4? Let's count: (7,7) plus (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) = 4 cells. Now output colors: Let's see mapping. Output row2: ". R R R . . . G . ." So the size3 group at (2,1-3) became R (red). Good. The isolated (2,7) became G? Wait output at (2,7) is G. Indeed size1? Actually group size2 with (3,7). But output shows (2,7) G, (3,7) G. So size2 group became G? Let's check. Row3 output: ". . . . . . . G . ." So (3,7) G. Thus size2 group colored G (green). But earlier we thought size2 groups maybe B? Let's see other size2 groups. Group at (5,3-4) plus (6,3) is size3, colored R? Output row5: ". . . R R . . . . ." (positions (5,3),(5,4) R). Row6: ". . . R . . . . . ." (6,3) R. So size3 -> R. Group at (8,1-2,9,1-2) size4: output rows8,9: row8 ". B B . . . B B B ." Wait row8 output: ". B B . . . B B B ." So positions (8,1),(8,2) are B (blue). Row9 output: ". B B . . . . . . ." So (9,1),(9,2) B. So size4 group -> B. Group at (7,7)+(8,6-8,8) size4: output row7 col7? Row7 output: ". . . . . . . B . ... [5656 chars truncated]
"A meteorologist color-codes cloud formations on a radar map by the number of connected cells each storm system occupies — small cells in one warning color, medium in another, large in a third."
120b: fail
See: A dark radar screen with scattered grey storm cells of varying extent.
Do: Measure each connected weather system by its cell count, then paint it in the alert color assigned to that severity tier.
Grid: Same radar dimensions. Clear sky stays dark. Each storm system is recolored by its size-based alert level.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has '.' black background, 'X' grey cells representing storm cells. Output recolors each connected component of X with a color based on its size (cell count). Need to map size to color: In example, we have components of various sizes colored R, G, B. Let's analyze example 1. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate X positions. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Row0: none Row1: none Row2: cols1,2,3 are X X X ; col7 X Row3: col7 X Row4: none Row5: col3,4 X X Row6: col3 X Row7: col7 X Row8: col1,2 X X ; col5 X ; col7,8,9 X X X Row9: col1,2 X X Now find connected components (4-directional adjacency? Likely orthogonal). Let's compute. Component A: cluster at rows2 cols1-3 (three X horizontally). Are they connected to anything else? Check adjacency: row3 col? row3 has X at col7 only, far. So component size =3. In output, those positions become R (row2 col1-3 are R). So size 3 -> R. Component B: single X at row2 col7, also row3 col7, row7 col7, row8 col7, maybe connected vertically? Let's see: row2 col7 X; row3 col7 X directly below, so connected. Row4 col7 none, row5 col7 none, row6 col7 none, row7 col7 X (gap of rows4-6). Since not contiguous, not connected. So component B is two cells (row2 col7, row3 col7) size 2. In output, those become G (row2 col7 G, row3 col7 G). So size 2 -> G. Component C: rows5 col3-4 X X (adjacent horizontally) plus row6 col3 X (below row5 col3). So shape: (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size 3. In output, those become R (row5 col3-4 R, row6 col3 R). So size 3 again -> R (consistent). Component D: row8 col1-2 X X and row9 col1-2 X X (a 2x2 block). That's size 4. Output: row8 col1-2 B B, row9 col1-2 B B. So size 4 -> B. Component E: row8 col5 X alone? Check adjacency: row7 col5 none, row9 col5 none, col4/6 none. So size1. Output: row8 col5 B? Wait output row8 col5 is B (looking at output row8: ". B B . . . B B B ."? Actually row8 output line: ". B B . . . B B B .". Let's map: row8 (index8) output: ". B B . . . B B B .". So col0 '.'; col1 B; col2 B; col3 '.'; col4 '.'; col5 '.'; col6 B; col7 B; col8 B; col9 '.' . Wait there is B at col6,7,8 correspond to input X at col7,8,9? Actually input row8 had X at col1,2,5,7,8,9. So col5 input X becomes output '.'? No output at col5 is '.' (since row8 col5 '.'), but input had X at col5. Let's double-check: Input row8: "X X . . . . . X X X"? Wait original row8 line: " . X X . . . X X X ."? Let's re-read example input row8: ". X X . . . X X X .". Yes row8 col0 '.'; col1 X; col2 X; col3 '.'; col4 '.'; col5 '.'; col6 X; col7 X; col8 X; col9 '.'. So there is no X at col5. My earlier misreading. So component E is the three X at col6-8 (contiguous horizontally). That's size 3. Output row8 col6-8 are B B B (but size 3 previously mapped to R). Wait earlier size 3 components were colored R. Here size 3 component colored B. So maybe color mapping depends on size tier thresholds, not direct size to color. Let's examine. Component F: row9 col1-2 X X part ... [9761 chars truncated]
"A city planner zones building footprints by the number of lots each structure occupies, painting small shops one color, mid-size offices another, and large warehouses a third on the master plan."
120b: fail
See: A blank city grid (black) with grey building footprints of varying sizes scattered across it.
Do: Count the lots each footprint covers, then color-code it according to the zoning designation for that building class.
Grid: Same city grid. Empty lots remain black. Each footprint takes its zoning color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid with '.' black and 'X' grey building footprints. Output replaces each connected component of X with a color based on its size (number of cells). In example, we see components of size 3 become R? Let's examine. Example1 input: Let's map coordinates. I'll list components. Row indices 0-9. Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: ". X X X . . . X . ." positions: (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally size3. Also (2,7) single X. 3: ". . . . . . . X . .": (3,7) single X adjacent vertically to (2,7) => component size2? Actually (2,7) and (3,7) are adjacent vertically, so component size2. 4: all . 5: ". . . X X . . . . .": (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally size2. 6: ". . . X . . . . . .": (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => component size3? Let's see: (5,3) connected to (6,3). Also (5,4) maybe not connected to (6,3) (diagonal not). So component includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) size3. 7: ". . . . . . . X . .": (7,7) single X, maybe adjacent to (3,7)? No far. 8: ". X X . . . X X X .": (8,1),(8,2) adjacent size2; also (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous size3. 9: ". X X . . . . . . .": (9,1),(9,2) size2 connected vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => component size4? Actually (8,1)-(8,2) and (9,1)-(9,2) forms 2x2 block size4. Now output colors: Rows output: 2: ". R R R . . . G . .": So the size3 horizontal component became R (red). The single X at (2,7) became G? Wait output at (2,7) is G. So component size2 (including (3,7)) maybe G? Let's see. Row3 output: ". . . . . . . G . .": (3,7) G as well. So component of size2 became G. Component size3 (the L shape of (5,3),(5,4),(6,3)) output: rows5: ". . . R R . . . . .": (5,3),(5,4) are R. Row6: ". . . R . . . . . .": (6,3) R. So size3 -> R again. Component size1? there is (7,7) single X. Output row7: ". . . . . . . B . .": (7,7) B. So size1 -> B. Component size2 (8,1)-(8,2) and (9,1)-(9,2) actually size4 component. Output rows8: ". B B . . . B B B .": positions (8,1),(8,2) B. Row9: ". B B . . . . . . .": (9,1),(9,2) B. So size4 -> B as well? Wait B also used for size1 earlier. So maybe B is for size >=4? But size1 also B. Let's double-check: maybe (7,7) is not size1 but part of larger component? Check adjacency: (7,7) adjacent to (8,6) diagonal? Not orthogonal. So isolated. So B used for size1 and size4. That seems inconsistent. Maybe colors correspond to specific shapes? Let's list mapping: Size1 -> B (blue) Size2 -> G (green) Size3 -> R (red) Size4 -> B (blue) again? maybe size4 also B. So maybe rule: color based on size modulo something? For size1 and size4 both map to B. That's size mod 3? 1 mod3 =1, 4 mod3=1. Size2 -> G (mod3=2). Size3 -> R (mod3=0). Yes! So mapping: remainder 0 -> R, remainder 1 -> B, remainder 2 -> G. That fits. Check: size3 remainder0 -> R. size6 would also be R etc. Thus rule: For each connected component of X (orthogonal adjacency), count cells n. Replace all those cells with color based on ... [3621 chars truncated]
"A field marshal marks enemy units on a tactical map with colored pins — the color of each pin reflects the size of the detachment spotted at that position."
120b: k=1
See: A dark tactical map with grey markers indicating enemy positions, each cluster representing a unit of unknown strength.
Do: Assess each unit's strength by counting its connected positions, then replace the grey markers with the colored pin designated for that unit size.
Grid: Same map. Unmarked terrain stays dark. Each unit's markers are replaced with their strength-coded color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has '.' black and 'X' grey markers. Output replaces X clusters with colors based on size (connected positions). Need to see mapping. Example1 input grid 10x10. Let's locate X clusters. I'll index rows 0-9, columns 0-9. Row0 all .; row1 all .; Row2: ". X X X . . . X . ." => positions (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) contiguous horizontally; also (2,7) isolated. Row3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (3,7) adjacent vertically to (2,7) => cluster size 2. Row4 all .; Row5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally size2. Row6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => cluster size3? Actually (5,3) and (5,4) and (6,3). (6,3) adjacent to (5,3). So cluster includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) size3. Row7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (7,7) adjacent vertically to (3,7)? Wait there is gap rows4,5,6 have no X at col7. So not connected. So (7,7) isolated size1. Row8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => (8,1),(8,2) adjacent; (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three contiguous horizontally. Row9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) => cluster size4? Let's compute: cluster A: positions (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) size4. Now also there is cluster B: (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) size3. Now also cluster C: (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) size3. Cluster D: (2,7),(3,7) size2. Cluster E: (5,3),(5,4),(6,3) size3. Cluster F: (7,7) size1. Now output colors: Let's map. Output row2: ". R R R . . . G . ." So positions (2,1-3) become R. So size3 cluster -> R. (2,7) becomes G. So size2 cluster? Wait (2,7) part of D size2, but output G. So size2 -> G? But later other size2 cluster (5,3,5,4?) Actually size3 cluster gave R. Let's see other colors. Row3 output: ". . . . . . . G . ." So (3,7) becomes G as part of same size2 cluster D. So size2 -> G. Row5 output: ". . . R R . . . . ." So (5,3),(5,4) become R. But note (6,3) also part of same cluster size3, but output row6: ". . . R . . . . . ." So (6,3) also R. So size3 cluster -> R (consistent). Row7 output: ". . . . . . . B . ." So (7,7) becomes B. So size1 -> B. Row8 output: ". B B . . . B B B ." So (8,1),(8,2) become B. That's size4 cluster? Wait size4 cluster includes (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2). But (9,1),(9,2) output row9: ". B B . . . . . . ." So they also B. So size4 cluster -> B. Row8 also (8,6-8) become B as well. That's size3 cluster? Actually (8,6-8) size3 but they are B not R. Hmm conflict. Let's examine: (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) cluster size3 but output B. So size3 sometimes R, sometimes B. Need other factor: maybe shape orientation? Or maybe colors correspond to specific sizes: size1->B? Wait size1 gave B (row7). size2 gave G. size3 gave R for some clusters, B for others. size4 gave B. So not just size. Maybe colors correspond to cluster size modulo something? Let's list: Cluster sizes and colors: size1: B size2: G size3: two clusters: C (top left) -> R, E (mid) -> R, also cluster (8,6-8) -> B. So size3 can be R or B. ... [4450 chars truncated]
"A lighting designer assigns gel colors to clusters of actors based on how many performers share each pooled spotlight — duets get one wash, trios another, quartets a third."
120b: k=1
See: A dark stage with groups of performers (grey) standing in separate pools of neutral light.
Do: Count the actors in each spotlight pool and switch the gel to the color assigned to that grouping size.
Grid: Same stage layout. Unlit areas stay dark. Each actor group is bathed in their size-assigned gel color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has '.' black, 'X' grey (actors). Output replaces X's with colors based on size of each connected group (pool). Groups are separate pools of neutral light (maybe connected components). Count actors in each group, then assign a gel color based on size. Need mapping size->color. From example: Let's analyze. Example 1 Input: we have X positions. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index? We'll just count groups. I'll draw grid 10x10. Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . X X X . . . X . . 3: . . . . . . . X . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: . . . X X . . . . . 6: . . . X . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . X . . 8: . X X . . . X X X . 9: . X X . . . . . . . Let's identify connected components of X using orthogonal adjacency? Likely 4-directional. Let's find groups. Group A: at row2 col1-3 (three X contiguous horizontally). Also maybe connected to others? Check adjacency: row2 col1 adjacent to row3 col1? row3 col1 is '.'; row2 col2 adjacent to row2 col3 etc. No other X adjacent. So size 3. Group B: at row2 col7 (single X). Adjacent to row3 col7 (X) yes row3 col7 is X. Also row3 col7 adjacent to row4 col7 '.'; row2 col7 also adjacent to row2 col6 '.'; row2 col8 '.'; So group includes row2 col7 and row3 col7. Also row3 col7 adjacent to row4 col7 '.'; row3 col7 adjacent to row3 col6 '.'; row3 col8 '.'; So size 2. Group C: row5 col3-4 (two X adjacent horizontally). Also row6 col3 is X directly below row5 col3, so connected. So group includes (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size 3. Group D: row7 col7 (X). Adjacent to row8 col7 (X) and row8 col6? row8 col6 is X, row8 col8 is X, also row9 col7 '.' . So group includes row7 col7, row8 col6,7,8 (three), plus maybe row8 col2? Wait row8 col2 is X? row8 col2 is X (since row8: . X X . . . X X X .). Actually row8 col1? Let's index: columns 0-9. Row8: col0 '.'; col1 X; col2 X; col3 '.'; col4 '.'; col5 '.'; col6 X; col7 X; col8 X; col9 '.'. So there are X at (8,1) and (8,2) separate from the cluster at col6-8? Are they connected via adjacency? (8,2) adjacent to (8,1) horizontally, but not to (8,6). So they are separate group. Thus group D: cluster at (7,7),(8,6),(8,7),(8,8) size 4. Group E: row8 col1-2 (two X). Also row9 col1-2 are X (row9: . X X . . . . . . .). So they connect vertically. So group includes (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) size 4. Group F: maybe any other X? That's all. Now output colors: Let's map. Output grid shows at those positions colors: Group A (size3) becomes R (red) according to output: row2 col1-3 are R R R. Yes. Group B (size2) becomes G? Wait output row2 col7 is G, row3 col7 is G. Yes size2 -> G (green). Group C (size3) becomes R as well: row5 col3-4 are R R, row6 col3 is R. Yes. Group D (size4) becomes B (blue): row7 col7 is B, row8 col6-8 are B B B. Yes. Group E (size4) becomes B as well: row8 col1-2 are B B, row9 col1-2 are B B. Yes. Thus mapping: size 2 -> G, size 3 -> R, size 4 -> B. What about other sizes? Po ... [3948 chars truncated]
"A gardener sorts volunteer seedling clusters by how many sprouts emerged together, then ties a different colored ribbon around each group to plan transplanting priorities."
120b: fail
See: A dark garden bed with clusters of grey seedlings of varying group sizes poking through the soil.
Do: Count the sprouts in each cluster and tie the ribbon color that corresponds to that count around the group.
Grid: Same bed dimensions. Bare soil stays dark. Each seedling cluster displays its count-assigned ribbon color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid with '.' black background, 'X' grey seedlings. Output replaces each cluster of X with a color based on count of X in that cluster. Need to determine mapping count->color. In example1, we have clusters of X in input. Let's map. Input example1 grid 10x10. Let's locate X positions. Row indices 0-9. Row2 (index2): ". X X X . . . X . ." => positions (2,1),(2,2),(2,3) cluster? contiguous orthogonal? They are adjacent horizontally. Also (2,7) separate. Row3: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (3,7) adjacent vertically to (2,7) => same cluster size 2? Actually (2,7) and (3,7) are adjacent vertically, so cluster of size 2. Row5: ". . . X X . . . . ." => (5,3),(5,4) adjacent horizontally cluster size2. Row6: ". . . X . . . . . ." => (6,3) adjacent vertically to (5,3) => same cluster size3? Actually (5,3) and (5,4) cluster; (6,3) below (5,3) adds to cluster making shape of 3 cells: (5,3),(5,4),(6,3). That's size3. Row7: ". . . . . . . X . ." => (7,7) separate? Check adjacency to earlier cluster at (3,7) etc. There's gap rows 4? Row4 index4 has none. So (7,7) isolated size1. Row8: ". X X . . . X X X ." => (8,1),(8,2) cluster maybe with (9?) Row9: ". X X . . . . . . ." => (9,1),(9,2) adjacent vertically to (8,1),(8,2) making cluster size4? Let's list: positions (8,1),(8,2),(9,1),(9,2) = 4 cells. Also there are X at (8,6),(8,7),(8,8) three cells horizontally cluster size3. Now output colors: Let's map. Output row2 (index2): ". R R R . . . G . ." So the three X at (2,1-3) become R. So cluster size3 -> R. The X at (2,7) becomes G? Wait output at (2,7) is G. So cluster size2 (with (3,7)) becomes G? Let's see row3 output (3,7) is G as well. So size2 -> G. Row5 output: ". . . R R . . . . ." positions (5,3),(5,4) become R. But note cluster size3 earlier includes (6,3). Let's see output row6 (6,3) is R as well. So cluster size3 -> R (consistent). Row7 output: ". . . . . . . B . ." position (7,7) becomes B. So size1 -> B. Row8 output: ". B B . . . B B B ." positions (8,1),(8,2) become B (size4 cluster). So size4 -> B. Also (8,6,7,8) become B (size3 cluster) but earlier size3 gave R. Wait conflict. Let's check: (8,6-8) cluster size3 but output shows B B B. So maybe rule not based on size alone but maybe count of X in each connected component of same row? Hmm. Let's examine: The cluster at (8,6-8) is size3 but output B not R. So maybe color depends on orientation? Or maybe clusters are defined differently: maybe diagonal adjacency counts? Let's see if (8,6-8) is adjacent to other X via diagonal to (7,7) which is B size1 cluster earlier. Diagonal adjacency maybe considered part of same cluster? If diagonal counts, then (8,6) diagonal to (7,7) (row7 col7). That would connect size1 cluster with this size3 making size4 cluster, which would be B (size4). Indeed (7,7) B plus (8,6-8) three cells = total 4 cells, output B for all. That matches size4 -> B. Similarly, the cluster ... [4994 chars truncated]
See: The input is a rectangular grid filled entirely with black (.) cells. The grid can be any width and height.
Do: Color every cell that lies on the border of the grid azure (A). A border cell is any cell in the first row, last row, first column, or last column. Leave all interior cells black (.).
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background is black, with a 1-cell-thick azure frame around the entire perimeter.
"A kingdom builds its castle walls to protect the darkness within."
120b: k=3
See: A quiet kingdom of shadow stretches across the land — nothing but still, dark earth as far as the eye can see.
Do: The kingdom raises azure fortress walls along every exposed edge, one stone thick. The sentinels stand guard only where the land meets the outside world. The interior remains untouched — a sheltered courtyard of darkness the walls were built to protect.
Grid: The kingdom keeps its original shape. Azure stone rises wherever the realm touches the frontier, forming an unbroken perimeter. The dark heart within sleeps undisturbed.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input grids are all black '.' cells. Output adds azure 'A' border of thickness one around the shape, leaving interior unchanged (still black). The shape is the original shape (the region of '.'), but we add A on the perimeter cells that are adjacent to outside (i.e., cells that are on the outer boundary of the shape). In examples, input is rectangular block of '.' of size (height x width). Output is same size, but border cells become A, interior remain '.'. Check Example1: Input 5 rows, 4 columns. Output: border A, interior '.' (3x2 interior). Yes. Example2: Input 4x3, output border A. Example3: Input 5x6, output border A. Thus rule: For any input grid, replace all '.' cells that are on the outer edge of the shape (i.e., have at least one neighbor that is outside the shape or outside grid) with 'A', keep interior '.' unchanged. Since shape is whole grid (all '.'), the border is the outermost rows and columns. Test input: 7 rows, 6 columns (looks like 7x6). So output should be 7x6 with border A, interior '.'. Thus rows: Row1: all A (6) Row2: A then 4 '.' then A Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: same Row7: all A So produce grid lines with spaces. Let's write: A A A A A A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A A A A A A Check dimensions: 7 rows, 6 columns. Return as answer block.
"A cell membrane crystallizes around the void of the cytoplasm, the phospholipid bilayer asserting its bright boundary while the interior remains in quiet dormancy."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An empty cellular space awaiting definition.
Do: The membrane assembles itself along every exposed edge, leaving the interior unstructured.
Grid: Same dimensions. Border cells become azure; interior stays black.
"A nebula's luminous shell glows azure where stellar winds compress its outer gas, but the hollow core remains a pocket of cold, lightless vacuum."
120b: k=1
See: A dark region of empty space.
Do: Ignite the outermost layer of the nebula on all sides; the interior void persists.
Grid: Same dimensions. Border cells become azure; interior stays black.
We need to interpret the puzzle. Input is all '.' (black). Output is border azure 'A' and interior stays '.'. Metaphorical description: "dark region of empty space" (black). "Ignite the outermost layer of the nebula on all sides; the interior void persists." So border becomes azure (A). So rule: replace all border cells (first row, last row, first column, last column) with azure 'A', keep interior unchanged. Thus for test input: dimensions? Provided test input grid: 7 rows, each with 6 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . ." that's 6 columns. There are 7 rows (lines). So output: same 7x6 grid, border cells become A, interior '.'. Thus rows: Row1 (top border): all A's: 6 A's. Row2: first and last column A, interior columns (2-5) remain '.' (since interior). So pattern: A . . . . A (6 columns) Row3 same as row2. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 bottom border: all A's. Thus produce output grid lines with spaces. Let's write: A A A A A A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A A A A A A Check count rows: 7 rows. Now produce final answer block.
"Bioluminescent plankton wash up along every shore of the black lagoon, tracing its exact outline in pale blue light — the deep water at the center stays dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark, still body of water.
Do: Light up every cell that touches the lagoon's edge; leave the deep interior unlit.
Grid: Same dimensions. Outer ring becomes azure; inside remains black.
"Current flows only through the trace that rings the circuit board's perimeter — a single-width loop of charged copper around a dark, unpowered core."
120b: k=1
See: A powered-down rectangular circuit board.
Do: Energize only the outermost trace loop; all interior components remain off.
Grid: Same dimensions. Border becomes azure; interior stays black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input is all '.' (black). Output: border becomes 'A' (azure) and interior stays '.'. So rule: replace outermost border cells with azure (A), keep interior unchanged. Test input is 7 rows x 6 columns? Let's count: given lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 7 rows, each 6 columns. So output: border cells (first row, last row, first column, last column) become A, interior (rows 2-6, columns 2-5) remain '.'. Thus produce 7x6 grid. Let's construct. Row1: all A (6) Row2: A then four '.' then A Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: same Row7: all A So rows 2-6 have pattern: A . . . . A (since interior columns 2-5 are '.'; there are 4 interior columns). Yes. Thus output grid: A A A A A A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A A A A A A Now produce answer block.
"The old gods drew a ring of sacred fire around the sleeping darkness, one pace wide on every side — nothing within the circle was to be touched or awakened."
120b: fail
See: A rectangular domain of primordial darkness.
Do: Inscribe the sacred boundary along every outer edge; preserve the darkness within.
Grid: Same dimensions. Perimeter cells become azure; interior stays black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input grids are all '.' (black). Output: perimeter cells become 'A' (azure), interior stays '.'. So rule: replace all cells on outer border with azure (A), keep interior unchanged. Test input is 7 rows, 6 columns? Let's count: given lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 7 rows, each with 6 columns. Thus output: first row all A's (6). Last row all A's (6). For rows 2-6 (i.e., rows index 1 to 5), first and last column become A, interior (columns 2-5) remain '.'. So produce grid: Row1: A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A Check interior columns count: total columns 6, interior columns are columns 2-5 (4 columns). So each interior row has A, then 4 dots, then A. Thus output. Now produce answer block.
"The corps de ballet forms a single unbroken line along every wall of the ballroom, their azure costumes glowing — the dark parquet floor at center remains empty, waiting."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An empty, dark ballroom.
Do: Position dancers at every edge cell; leave the central floor vacant.
Grid: Same dimensions. Border positions become azure; interior stays black.
"Mineral deposits precipitate along the walls of an underground cavern — a thin azure rind of crystal encrusts every exposed surface while the hollow interior stays dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark, empty subterranean chamber.
Do: Crystallize a single layer of mineral along every bounding surface; the interior air remains untouched.
Grid: Same dimensions. Outermost cells become azure; interior cells stay black.
"A chef caramelizes only the crust of a dark chocolate ganache tart, leaving the center molten and untouched — the glaze knows to stop where the filling begins."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A uniformly dark confection before finishing.
Do: Apply the glaze to every outer surface, leaving the interior in its original rich darkness.
Grid: Same dimensions. Outermost ring becomes azure; inside remains black.
"The orchestra falls silent, and only the musicians seated at the edge of the pit sustain a single azure note — those buried within let their instruments rest."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A silent ensemble arranged in rows and columns.
Do: Awaken only the performers who sit along the perimeter; the rest hold their silence.
Grid: Same dimensions. Edge positions become azure; interior stays black.
"The referee paints the sidelines and end lines of a darkened pitch in vivid blue before the night match — the field of play itself remains unlit."
120b: fail
See: A dark rectangular playing surface with no markings.
Do: Mark every boundary line of the field, leaving the interior unmarked.
Grid: Same dimensions. Perimeter cells turn azure; interior cells stay black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input grid is all '.' (black). Output is perimeter cells turned to 'A' (azure), interior stays '.'. Thus rule: replace all boundary cells (first row, last row, first column, last column) with azure (A). Keep interior unchanged. Test input is 7 rows, 6 columns? Let's count: Provided lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 7 rows, each with 6 columns. So output: first row all A's (6). Last row all A's (6). For rows 2-6 (i.e., rows index 2-6), first and last column A, interior columns (2-5) remain '.'. Thus produce 7 rows: Row1: A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A Check interior columns count: total columns 6, interior columns are columns 2-5 (4 columns). So each interior row has A, then four dots, then A. Now produce answer block.
"A frost creeps across a frozen lake at midnight, but it only reaches from the shore inward by a single step — the deep center stays black beneath unfrozen ice."
120b: k=1
See: A dark, featureless frozen expanse.
Do: Let the frost advance exactly one cell from every edge, leaving the heart of the lake untouched.
Grid: Same dimensions. One-cell-deep border becomes azure; center stays black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input is all '.' (black). Output shows azure border (A) one cell thick, interior remains '.' (black). So rule: replace all cells that are on the outermost border (i.e., any cell that is in first row, last row, first column, last column) with azure (A). Keep interior unchanged. Test input is 7 rows x 6 columns? Let's count: Provided lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 7 rows, each with 6 columns. So output should have azure border: first row all A, last row all A, first column and last column A, interior '.'. Thus produce 7 rows, 6 columns. Row1: A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A Check interior columns: columns 2-5 (since 6 columns) are '.' for rows 2-6. Return grid with spaces. Now need to include conceptual digestion: CAST, AFFORDANCES, TRANSFORMATION RULE. Provide reasoning. Finally output block. Let's craft answer.
"The mason lays azure tiles along every threshold and lintel of the dark hall — where wall meets void, brightness is placed, but the interior floor is left in shadow."
120b: k=2
See: A dark rectangular room with no ornamentation.
Do: Tile every position where the structure meets the outside world; leave all interior flooring bare.
Grid: Same dimensions. Outer ring becomes azure; inside remains black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input grids are all '.' (black). Output grids have azure 'A' on outer ring, interior '.' unchanged. So rule: replace all border cells with 'A', keep interior as original (which is '.'). So test input is 7 rows x 6 columns? Let's count: Provided lines: ". . . . . ." repeated 7 times? Let's count lines: they show 7 lines: 1 . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . Yes 7 rows, 6 columns. So output: border cells (first and last row, first and last column) become 'A', interior cells remain '.'. Thus rows: Row1: all A (6) Row2: A . . . . A (since 6 columns, interior columns 2-5 are '.'; first and last A) Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: same Row7: all A So produce grid lines with spaces. Let's write: A A A A A A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A A A A A A Check dimensions: 7 rows, 6 columns. Now produce answer block.
"The general stations sentinels shoulder-to-shoulder along the entire perimeter of the camp — inside, the sleeping army lies hidden in darkness."
120b: k=1
See: A dark encampment with no visible defenses.
Do: Place sentinels at every position along the camp's outer edge; the interior remains dark and undisturbed.
Grid: Same dimensions. Border cells become azure; interior stays black.
We need to infer rule: Input is all black '.' grid. Output: border cells become azure 'A', interior stays black '.'. Example 1: Input 5x4? Actually given: Input lines: ". . . ." repeated 5 rows? Let's count: they show 5 rows of 4 columns. Output: border A, interior '.'. So rule: For any input grid, replace all border cells (first row, last row, first column, last column) with azure 'A', keep interior unchanged (original colors). In example interior was '.' so stays '.'. Test input: 7 rows, 6 columns all '.'. Thus output: 7x6 grid where border cells are 'A', interior '.'. Let's construct. Rows index 0-6, cols 0-5. Row0: all A (6) Row1: col0 A, cols1-4 ., col5 A Row2: same Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: all A So rows 1-5 interior rows. Thus output lines: Row0: A A A A A A Row1: A . . . . A Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A A A A A A Check dimensions: 7 rows, 6 columns. Now produce answer block.
"The stage lights ignite only along the proscenium arch and the wings — the actors standing center-stage remain cloaked in darkness, waiting for their cue."
120b: k=2
See: A completely dark stage.
Do: Illuminate every position along the frame of the stage; leave the interior dark.
Grid: Same dimensions. Edge positions become azure; center positions stay black.
We need to interpret puzzle. Input grids are all '.' (black). Output is azure 'A' on border, interior stays '.'. Thus rule: replace all edge cells with 'A', keep interior as '.'. Test input is 7 rows, 6 columns? Let's count: lines: ". . . . . ." that's 6 columns. There are 7 rows. So output: same dimensions 7x6, border cells (first row, last row, first column, last column) become 'A', interior '.'. So produce grid: Row1: all A (6) Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A . . . . A Row7: all A Check interior rows count: rows 2-6 have first and last A, middle 4 '.'. Thus output. Now produce answer block with spaces. Let's write rows: A A A A A A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A . . . . A A A A A A A Return.
"The gardener plants a hedge of blue hydrangeas in a single row around the entire plot, while the soil within the border lies fallow and dark, awaiting spring."
120b: k=2
See: A bare rectangular garden plot.
Do: Plant along every edge of the plot, one row deep; leave the interior as bare earth.
Grid: Same dimensions. Perimeter becomes azure; interior stays black.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: "Plant along every edge of the plot, one row deep; leave the interior as bare earth. Grid details: Same dimensions. Perimeter becomes azure; interior stays black." So input grid is all '.' (black). Output: perimeter cells become 'A' (azure), interior stays '.'. Examples confirm: Example1 input 5x4? Actually input shows 5 rows, 4 columns? Let's count: Input lines: ". . . ." repeated 5 rows. Output: 5 rows, 4 columns, with A border. Example2: Input 4 rows, 3 columns. Output border A. Thus rule: Replace all cells on the outermost border (first row, last row, first column, last column) with 'A', keep interior '.'. Now test input: 7 rows, 6 columns (since 7 lines each with 6 '.' separated by spaces). So output: 7x6 grid with border A, interior '.'. Thus produce rows: Row1: A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . A Row3: A . . . . A Row4: A . . . . A Row5: A . . . . A Row6: A . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A Check interior rows count: total rows 7, interior rows are rows 2-6 (5 rows). Each interior row has first and last column A, interior columns 2-5 '.' (4 columns). So each interior row: A . . . . A. Now produce output block. Make sure format: characters separated by spaces. Thus final answer.
See: The input grid contains a single horizontal bar made of blue (B) cells spanning one full row, with one or more non-blue colored marker cells (such as azure A or red R) embedded at specific positions within that bar. The rest of the grid is black (.) empty space. The bar can appear at any row in the grid.
Do: For each non-blue marker cell in the horizontal bar, grow a vertical column upward from that marker's position. The column's height (including the marker copy at the top) depends on the marker's color: azure (A) produces a column of height 3 (the top cell is A, followed by 2 blue B cells below it, connecting down to the bar), and red (R) produces a column of height 4 (the top cell is R, followed by 3 blue B cells below it, connecting down to the bar). The marker cell in the original bar remains unchanged. All other cells remain black.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly and do not change. The background is black (.). The horizontal bar occupies exactly one row. Columns grow strictly upward from the bar; no cells are modified below the bar or beyond the grid boundaries.
"Rockets on a launchpad ignite according to their fuel type."
120b: k=2
See: A launchpad stretches across the darkness — a solid blue runway with special rocket engines embedded in it, each glowing a distinct color (azure or red) to signal what kind of fuel they carry.
Do: When launch is triggered, each colored engine fires a plume straight up into the night sky. The plume is a column of blue exhaust capped by a bright flare matching the engine's color. Red rockets burn hotter and their plumes reach higher than azure ones. The engines themselves stay bolted to the launchpad.
Grid: The night sky stays dark except where exhaust trails rise. The launchpad remains fixed in its row. Plumes only fire upward — nothing falls below the runway, and no rocket escapes the edge of the sky.
We need to infer rule. From description: launchpad is a solid blue runway (row of B) with special rocket engines embedded, each glowing distinct color (azure A or red R) to signal fuel. When launch triggered, each colored engine fires a plume straight up: column of blue exhaust capped by a bright flare matching engine's color. Red rockets burn hotter and plumes reach higher than azure ones. Engines stay in launchpad row. Plumes only fire upward, nothing below runway, no rocket escapes edge. Interpretation: Input grid has a row of B (blue) representing runway. Some cells in that row are A (azure) or R (red) representing engines. Output adds vertical columns above each engine: a column of B cells (blue exhaust) extending upward some number of rows, ending with a cell of the engine's color (A or R) at the top of the column. For red rockets, plume reaches higher than azure ones (i.e., longer column). Need to determine lengths: maybe red plume length = number of rows above runway? In examples, we can deduce. Example1: Input grid size? Let's count rows: Input shows 9 rows? Actually list: . . . . . . (row1) ... row2 row3 row4 B A B B B B (row4) then rows5-9 all dots. Output: rows1-9 with modifications. Let's map coordinates. Runway row is row4 (0-index maybe). In output, we see column above A (at column2?) Let's index columns 1-6. Input row4: B A B B B B. So A at column2. Output: row1: . A . . . . (so A at top row column2). Row2: . B . . . . (B at column2). Row3: . B . . . . (B at column2). Row4 unchanged runway. So plume: top cell A, then two B cells below it, then runway B at row4 column2? Actually runway at row4 column2 is A originally, not B. Wait runway row has A at column2, not B. So plume includes the engine cell itself? The description says engine stays in runway row. So output should keep A at runway row, not replaced. In output row4 column2 is A? Let's check output row4: B A B B B B (same). Yes row4 column2 is A. So plume above includes B cells directly above engine, then top cell is A (flare). In output, row1 column2 is A (top), rows2-3 column2 are B, row4 column2 is A (engine). So plume length for azure = 2 B cells above plus top A. So total height (including engine) = 3 rows? Actually engine row is part of runway, not counted as plume length. The plume extends upward: number of B cells = maybe count of B cells above engine equals number of B cells to left/right? Not. Now Example2: Input grid: 10 rows? Let's count: rows: 1-5 all dots, row6 B B B R B B B (runway), rows7-10 all dots. Output: rows1-5 have modifications: row1 all dots, row2 . . . R . . . (R at column4 top), row3 . . . B . . . (B at column4), row4 . . . B . . ., row5 . . . B . . . . Row6 unchanged runway. So plume for red engine at column4: top cell R at row2, then three B cells rows3-5, then engine row6 column4 is R. So red plume has 3 B cells above, azure had 2 B cells above. So red plume longer by 1 row. So rule: azure plume height = 2 B cells above engine; red plume height ... [4890 chars truncated]
"Certain enzymes along a chromosome express themselves differently depending on their type, sending protein chains of varying lengths toward the cell membrane."
120b: k=2
See: A horizontal strand of uniform genetic material stretches across the culture, punctuated by differently-colored enzyme markers embedded within it.
Do: Each enzyme activates and synthesizes a protein chain that extends away from the strand. The chain length and cap molecule depend on the enzyme's identity — some produce shorter chains, others longer ones.
Grid: The strand remains fixed in place. Protein chains grow perpendicular to the strand from each enzyme site, capped by a copy of the enzyme at the distal end.
We need to infer rule. From description: horizontal strand of uniform genetic material across the culture, punctuated by differently-colored enzyme markers embedded within it. The strand remains fixed; protein chains grow perpendicular to the strand from each enzyme site, capped by a copy of the enzyme at distal end. So input has a horizontal line (row) of something (maybe B's?) with other colors as enzymes. Output shows vertical lines extending up (or down?) from each enzyme cell, with same color chain and cap. Look at Example1. Input grid size 9 rows x 6 columns? Actually given 9 rows (0-8) each with 6 columns. The strand appears at row 3 (0-index) with "B A B B B B". So row 3 has B A B B B B. That's the horizontal strand. The rest are '.' (black). Output shows vertical chain from the A at column1? Let's map coordinates: columns 0-5. Input row3: col0 B, col1 A, col2 B, col3 B, col4 B, col5 B. Output: we see at column1 (A) there is A at row0? Actually output rows: Row0: ". A . . . ." Row1: ". B . . . ." Row2: ". B . . . ." Row3: "B A B B B B" Rows4-8 all '.'. So vertical chain above the A: at row0 col1 is A (cap), rows1-2 col1 are B (chain). So chain length 2? The enzyme is A (azure). The chain is made of B (blue) maybe the uniform strand material? The cap is copy of enzyme (A) at distal end (top). The chain extends upward (perpendicular) from the strand (which is horizontal). So direction is upward (north). In Example2, strand row5 (0-index) with "B B B R B B B". Enzyme is R at column3. Output shows vertical chain above R: rows1-4 col3 have R? Let's see output rows: Row0: all '.'. Row1: ". . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . B . . ." Row3: ". . . B . . ." Row4: ". . . B . . ." Row5: "B B B R B B B" Rows6-9 '.'. So at column3 (0-index) we have enzyme R at row5. Output shows at row1 col3 is R (cap), rows2-4 col3 are B (chain). That's length 3 chain (rows2-4). So chain length maybe depends on enzyme identity: A gave length 2, R gave length 3. Let's hypothesize mapping: each enzyme color corresponds to a specific chain length (number of B cells) and cap is enzyme at top. The chain is made of the uniform strand color (B). The strand is B across row. So chain length maybe equals some property like alphabetical order? Let's list: A (azure) length 2, R (red) length 3. Need more data but only two examples. Maybe length equals number of letters in enzyme name? Not. Maybe length equals distance to nearest edge? In Example1, A at column1, distance to top edge is 3 rows above (row0-2). But chain length is 2 (B cells) plus cap at row0, total 3 cells above strand. That's distance to top? Row index of strand is 3, so rows above are 0,1,2 (3 rows). The output uses cap at row0, chain of B at rows1-2 (2 cells). So total cells above = 3 = distance. So chain length (B cells) = distance -1? For R in Example2, strand row5, distance to top =5 rows (0-4). Output uses cap at row1 (not row0). Wait cap at row1, chain rows2-4 (3 B cells). That's total 4 cells above strand ... [5424 chars truncated]
"Anomalous stars embedded in a galactic arm emit jets of plasma — red dwarfs produce longer jets than blue giants before the plasma dissipates."
120b: k=2
See: A galactic arm of uniform starlight sweeps across the void, with a few distinctly colored stellar anomalies embedded within it.
Do: Each anomaly emits a plasma jet perpendicular to the arm. The jet length depends on the star's spectral class, with the star's color visible at the jet terminus.
Grid: The galactic arm persists. Plasma jets extend from each anomaly, tipped with the anomaly's color.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1 input: grid 9 rows? Actually given 9 rows? Let's count: Input lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "B A B B B B" ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 9 rows, 6 columns. Output: ". A . . . ." ". B . . . ." ". B . . . ." "B A B B B B" ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." So original arm is row 4 (0-index 3) with pattern B A B B B B (blue, azure, etc). In output, we see a vertical column of A and B above the arm: At column 2? Let's map coordinates. Input row4: columns: 0 B,1 A,2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B. Output: row1 (index0) has A at column1? Actually output row0: ". A . . . ." => A at column1. Row1: ". B . . . ." => B at column1. Row2: ". B . . . ." => B at column1. Row3 unchanged: "B A B B B B". So the anomaly is at column1 (A) and column0? Wait there is also B at column0 but that's part of arm. The rule: For each colored anomaly embedded within the uniform arm, we emit a jet perpendicular to the arm. The arm is horizontal line of uniform color? In example1, the arm is row of B's with an A anomaly among them. The uniform starlight is B (blue). The anomaly is A (azure). Jet extends upward (perpendicular) from the anomaly, length depends on spectral class (maybe color determines length). In output, we see a column of A then B then B above the arm at same column as anomaly (col1). The tip color is the anomaly's color (A) at topmost cell? Actually topmost is A, then below are B's (maybe length 3? Actually there are three cells above arm: rows0-2. The topmost is A, then two B's. So length maybe 3? Let's see spectral class mapping: A maybe length 3? B maybe length 2? Not sure. Example2: Input grid 10 rows? Let's count: lines: ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." "B B B R B B B" ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." That's 10 rows, 7 columns. Output: ". . . . . . ." ". . . R . . ." ". . . B . . ." ". . . B . . ." ". . . B . . ." "B B B R B B B" ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." So arm is row5 (index5) with B B B R B B B (blue with a red anomaly at column3). Output shows vertical column at column3 (0-index) above the arm: rows1-4 have R at row1 (topmost), then B at rows2-4 (three B's). So length 4? Actually there are 4 cells above arm (rows1-4). Topmost is R (the anomaly color), then three B's (the arm color). So jet length = 4 cells (including tip). In example1, length was 3 cells (topmost A, then two B). So length maybe depends on something: maybe the spectral class is determined by the anomaly's color: A (azure) length 3, R (red) length 4. Could be mapping: length = number of letters in color name? Not. Let's examine: In example1, anomaly color A (azure) maybe length = 3 (since azure is 5 letters). Not. Maybe length equals the count of that color in the arm? In example1, arm has B's count =5? Actually B count 5 (sinc ... [6669 chars truncated]
"Buoys anchored to a sea chain surface at different depths depending on their class — red channel markers ride higher on longer tethers than blue navigation buoys."
120b: k=3
See: A chain stretches along the sea floor, mostly uniform, with distinctly colored buoy anchors attached at certain points.
Do: Each anchor releases a tether that rises toward the surface. The tether length depends on the buoy class, with the colored buoy floating at the top.
Grid: The chain stays on the bottom. Tethers extend upward from each anchor, with the buoy color at the top.
We need to infer rule. From description: chain at bottom row (or near bottom) with anchors (colored buoys) attached at certain points. Tethers rise upward from each anchor, with buoy color at top. So we take the row containing the chain (the row with many B's and maybe other colors) and for each non-blank cell (colored) in that row, we create a vertical column upward (north) from that cell, placing the same color at the topmost cell of that column? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input: grid 9 rows? Actually given 9 rows? Let's count: Input lines: ". . . . . ." repeated 3, then "B A B B B B", then 5 rows of dots. So total 9 rows. The chain row is row index 3 (0-based). Output: we see column above each anchor: For A at column 1 (0-index?), output shows A at row0 col1? Let's map. Input row3: B A B B B B (columns 0-5). Output rows 0-2 have some colors: Row0: ". A . . . ." (A at col1). Row1: ". B . . . ." (B at col1). Row2: ". B . . . ." (B at col1). So vertical column above column1: topmost is A (the buoy color), then B's below? Actually chain row remains unchanged at row3. The column above shows A at top, then B's filling down to just above chain? In output, there are 3 rows above chain (rows0-2). The chain row is row3. The column above column1 has A at row0, B at rows1-2. That's length 3 (distance from top to just above chain). But why B's? Perhaps the tether is colored B (blue) for all anchors except the buoy color at top? In description: "Each anchor releases a tether that rises toward the surface. The tether length depends on the buoy class, with the colored buoy floating at the top." Maybe tether color is blue (B) for all? Let's see Example2. Example2 Input: chain row is row5 (0-index). Row5: B B B R B B B (7 columns). Output: rows1-4 have vertical columns above each anchor. Let's examine column3 (where R is). Output rows1-4 column3: row1: R, row2: B, row3: B, row4: B. So topmost is R (buoy color), then B's downwards until just above chain row (row4). So tether color is B (blue). For other columns where anchor is B, we see column above with B's? Let's check column0 (B). Output rows1-4 column0: row1: ., row2: ., row3: ., row4: .? Actually output shows row1: . . . . . . . (all dots). Wait output rows0-4? Let's list output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . Row1: . . . R . . . Row2: . . . B . . . Row3: . . . B . . . Row4: . . . B . . . Row5: B B B R B B B Rows6-9: all dots. So only column3 (where R) has vertical column; other columns have none. So why only R? Because maybe only non-B anchors produce tethers? In Example1, anchor A produced column; B anchors did not produce column (except B's in column above A). So rule: For each non-B colored cell in chain row, create vertical column upward: topmost cell is that color, and fill the cells below it (down to just above chain row) with B (blue). The length of column maybe equal to the number of cells above chain row? In Example1, there were 3 rows above chain (rows0-2). So column length = number of rows ... [6900 chars truncated]
"Components soldered to a bus line discharge at different voltages — each type drives a signal trace of proportional length along the perpendicular rail."
120b: k=2
See: A uniform bus line runs across the circuit board, with distinctly colored components soldered at specific positions.
Do: Each component activates, sending a signal trace perpendicular to the bus. The trace length depends on the component type, with the component's identifier visible at the trace end.
Grid: The bus line remains. Signal traces extend from each component position, terminated by the component's color.
We need to infer rule. From description: uniform bus line across grid, components at specific positions. Bus line remains. Signal traces extend from each component position, terminated by component's color. In examples, bus line is a row of B's (blue) maybe with other component letters like A, R etc. Input shows a row of B's with some other letters (A, R) among them. Output shows vertical traces from those letters upward? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? 9 rows, 6 columns? Actually given lines: Input rows: 9 rows? Let's count: they show 9 rows of 6 columns. Row4 (index starting 1) is "B A B B B B". Others are all '.'. Output: same size. Row4 unchanged. Additionally, there are vertical columns above row4: At column2 (where A is) we see in output: row1 col2 = A, rows2-3 col2 = B? Wait output rows: Row1: ". A . . . ." Row2: ". B . . . ." Row3: ". B . . . ." Row4: "B A B B B B" Rows5-9 all '.'. So from the component A at row4 col2, we have a trace upward: at row1 col2 is A (the component identifier visible at trace end). The trace consists of B's (bus color) in rows2-3 col2. So trace length is 3? Actually distance from component row4 up to top row row1 is 3 cells above (rows3,2,1). The trace includes B's in rows2-3, and the topmost cell shows A (the component's color). So the trace length depends on component type? In example1 only A component. The trace length maybe equals number of letters in component identifier? Not. Example2: Input: 10 rows, 7 columns? Row6 is "B B B R B B B". Output shows vertical trace above the R component (col4). Let's examine output rows: Row1: all '.' (since output row1 is ". . . . . . .") Row2: ". . . R . . ." Row3: ". . . B . . ." Row4: ". . . B . . ." Row5: ". . . B . . ." Row6: "B B B R B B B" Rows7-10 all '.'. So trace goes upward from row6 col4 (R). At row5,4 is B; row4,4 B; row3,4 B; row2,4 R (component identifier at top). So length of trace is 4 cells above component (rows5-2). The topmost cell shows R, not B. So trace length maybe equals something like number of same-colored B's to left/right? Not. In example1, component A had trace length 3 (rows2-1). In example2, component R had trace length 4. What determines length? Possibly distance to nearest other component on bus line? In example1 bus line row4 has B A B B B B. Only one A at col2. To left of A is B at col1. To right there are B's. Maybe trace length equals number of B's to left of component? For A at col2, left side has 1 B (col1). But trace length is 3, not 1. Maybe trace length equals number of columns from component to edge? For col2, distance to top edge is rows above (since bus line is at row4). Number of rows above is 3 (since total rows 9, bus at row4, rows above = 3). Indeed trace length = rows above bus line (i.e., distance to top). In example2, bus line at row6 (since row6 has B B B R B B B). Total rows 10, rows above = 5 (rows1-5). But trace length observed is 4 (rows5-2). Not full 5; topmost row (row1) is '.' not R. So trace le ... [9196 chars truncated]
"Runes carved into Yggdrasil's root each summon a different spirit — fire runes call forth taller flame pillars than ice runes raise frost columns."
120b: k=3
See: A great root stretches across the world, inscribed with mostly uniform markings but bearing a few distinctly colored runes at certain points.
Do: Each rune awakens, summoning a pillar of elemental force perpendicular to the root. The pillar's height depends on the rune's element, with the rune's glow crowning the top.
Grid: The root remains unchanged. Elemental pillars extend from each rune, topped by the rune's color.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid has a "root" row of many B's and other colors (A,R etc). In examples, root row is a horizontal line of B's with occasional other colors (A,R). The transformation: For each non-B element (rune) in root row, we create a vertical pillar upward (or maybe both directions?) The description: "Each rune awakens, summoning a pillar of elemental force perpendicular to the root. The pillar's height depends on the rune's element, with the rune's glow crowning the top." So we need to map each rune color to a pillar of certain height (maybe number of cells above root). The pillar is made of the same color as the rune? Or maybe a specific color per element? In examples, we can deduce. Example1: Input grid 9 rows? Actually given 9 rows (0-8). Root row is row index 3 (0-index). Row 3: B A B B B B. So there is an A at column 1 (0-index). Output: we see a vertical column of A at row0 col1? Let's examine output grid: rows 0-8. Output rows: Row0: . A . . . . Row1: . B . . . . Row2: . B . . . . Row3: B A B B B B Rows4-8 all dots. So pillar: At column1 (where A is in root), we have A at top row0, then B's at rows1-2? Actually rows1-2 have B at column1. So pillar height is 3? The root row is row3. Pillar extends upward from root: row2, row1, row0. The topmost cell (row0) is the rune's color (A). The cells below (row1-2) are B (blue). So B is the "elemental force" color (maybe same for all runes). So the pillar consists of B cells (blue) for the height-1 part, topped with the rune's color. Now need to know height depends on rune's element. For A (azure) maybe height 3? Let's see other examples. Example2: Input root row is row5: B B B R B B B. So a single R at column3 (0-index). Output shows pillar of R at row1 col3? Let's list output rows (10 rows). Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . Row1: . . . R . . . Row2: . . . B . . . Row3: . . . B . . . Row4: . . . B . . . Row5: B B B R B B B Rows6-9 all dots. So pillar extends upward from root row5 to rows4,3,2,1,0? Actually we have B at rows2-4 (three B's) and R at row1 (top). No cell at row0. So height is 4? Let's count: root row5 (contains R). Pillar cells above: row4 B, row3 B, row2 B, row1 R. That's 4 cells total (including top). So height = 4. For R (red) height 4. For A earlier height 3. So height depends on color. Example3: Input root row is row7: B A B B B A B R B (9 columns). Output rows (9 rows). Let's map. Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . A . . . A . B . Row5: . B . . . B . B . Row6: . B . . . B . B . Row7: B A B B B A B R B Row8: . . . . . . . . . Let's index columns 0-8. Root row7: B A B B B A B R B. We have runes at column1 (A), column5 (A), column7 (R). Output shows pillars for each. For column1 (A): topmost A at row4 col1. B's at rows5-6 col1? Actually row5 col1 is B, row6 col1 is B. So pillar height = 3? Wait root row7, then rows6,5,4 above. Row4 has A (top), rows5-6 have B. Tha ... [5764 chars truncated]
"Dancers in a chorus line leap at their cue — soloists in crimson leap four beats high while those in teal leap only three, each hanging suspended at the peak."
120b: k=2
See: A chorus line of uniformly costumed dancers stretches across the stage, with a few wearing distinctly colored costumes at certain positions.
Do: Each costumed dancer leaps perpendicular to the line. The height of the leap depends on the costume color, with the dancer visible at the apex and a motion trail connecting back to the line.
Grid: The chorus line stays grounded. Vertical motion trails extend from each leaping dancer, with their costume color at the peak.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1 input grid 9 rows? Let's count: Input shows 9 rows? Actually lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "B A B B B B" ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 9 rows, 6 columns. Output also 9 rows 6 columns. Observation: There's a horizontal line of dancers (the "chorus line") at row 4 (0-index maybe row3) containing B A B B B B. In output, that line stays same (row4 unchanged). Then there are vertical trails above it for each colored dancer (non-B? Actually A is azure). In input, there is an A at column2 (index1) and also B's elsewhere. In output, we see column2 (where A was) now has A at row1 (topmost) and B's below? Let's examine output rows: Row1: ". A . . . ." Row2: ". B . . . ." Row3: ". B . . . ." Row4: "B A B B B B" Rows5-9 all dots. So vertical trail of B's from row2-3 under the A? Actually column2: row1 A, rows2-3 B, row4 A (original). So the A moved up to top row, leaving a trail of B's in between? Wait original had A at row4 column2 (same as output). In output, A appears also at row1 column2 (above). So the dancer leaps upward (perpendicular to line) with height depending on costume color. The apex is visible at top of trail. The trail is colored with maybe the dancer's original line color? The line is B's (blue). So the trail is B's. The dancer's color is A (azure). So the apex is A at top, trail B's connecting down to original position (which remains A). So rule: For each non-B cell in the horizontal line (the "chorus line"), we create a vertical column upward (or maybe both directions?) of B's from the line up to some height determined by the dancer's color, and place the dancer's color at the topmost cell (apex). Height depends on color: For A, height is 3? Actually there are 2 B's between apex and original (rows2-3). So total distance from line to apex is 3 rows (including apex row). So height = something. Now Example2: Input 10 rows? Let's count: lines: ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." "B B B R B B B" ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." That's 10 rows, 7 columns. Output rows: ". . . . . . ." ". . . R . . ." ". . . B . . ." ". . . B . . ." ". . . B . . ." "B B B R B B B" ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." ". . . . . . ." So original line at row6 (index5) with B B B R B B B. The R is at column4 (index3). In output, we have R at row2 column4 (apex). Then B's at rows3-5 column4 (trail). So height: apex row2, line row6, distance 4 rows (including apex? Actually rows2-5 are 4 rows: apex row2, then B rows3,4,5, then line row6). So there are 3 B's between apex and line? Wait rows3-5 are three B's, plus apex R. So total vertical distance from line to apex is 4 rows (line row6 to apex row2). So number of B's = line row - apex row -1 = 3. So height for R is 4 rows (apex at row2). For A earlier height was 3 rows (apex row1, line row4). So height depends on ... [5284 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins trapped in a bedrock stratum erupt under tectonic pressure — basalt intrusions push farther than quartz dikes before cooling solid."
120b: k=3
See: A horizontal stratum of uniform bedrock cuts across the formation, with distinctly colored mineral deposits embedded at certain points.
Do: Tectonic stress forces each mineral deposit to intrude perpendicular to the stratum. The intrusion length depends on the mineral type, with the mineral visible at the leading edge.
Grid: The stratum remains. Mineral intrusions extend from each deposit, tipped with the deposit's color.
We need to infer rule. From description: horizontal stratum of uniform bedrock cuts across formation, with colored mineral deposits embedded at certain points. The stratum remains. Mineral intrusions extend from each deposit, tipped with deposit's color. Intrude perpendicular to stratum. So stratum is a row of uniform bedrock? In examples, the row with many B's (blue) is the stratum? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid 9 rows, 6 columns. Row4 (0-index? Actually row index 4?) Input shows row4: "B A B B B B". That's a row of B's with an A at column2? Actually B A B B B B (positions 1-6). That's the stratum? Output shows same row unchanged. Then above that row, there are intrusions: In output, we see column2 (where A is) has A at row1 (just above stratum) and B at rows2-3? Wait output grid: rows: Row1: ". A . . . ." Row2: ". B . . . ." Row3: ". B . . . ." Row4: "B A B B B B" Rows5-9 all dots. So the stratum row is row4 unchanged. The A deposit at column2 (index2) produced an intrusion upward (perpendicular) of length? It shows A at row1 (topmost), then B at rows2-3 (blue). The tip is A (deposit color) at top, and the rest of intrusion is B (the stratum color). Similarly, there is a B deposit at column1? Actually row4 column1 is B (part of stratum). In output, there is B at row2? Wait column1 has B at row2? Output row2 column1 is '.'? Actually row2: ". B . . . ." means column2 B. So column1 no intrusion. So only deposits that are not the stratum color? The stratum is B (blue). Deposits of other colors (A) cause intrusion. The intrusion consists of a vertical line upward from the stratum, length equal to something? In example1, A deposit produced intrusion of length 3 rows (including tip). The tip is A, the rest are B (stratum color). How many rows? The distance from stratum to top edge? The stratum is at row4 (index 4). The grid height is 9 rows. So there are 5 rows above stratum. But intrusion only 3 rows tall. Maybe length equals number of same-colored deposits in row? Not. Let's examine Example2. Input: 10 rows, 7 columns. Row6 (index6?) Actually row6 (starting 1) is "B B B R B B B". That's the stratum row (all B except R at column4). Output: same row unchanged. Above it, we see intrusion at column4 (where R deposit). Output rows: Row1: all dots Row2: ". . . R . . ." Row3: ". . . B . . ." Row4: ". . . B . . ." Row5: ". . . B . . ." Row6: "B B B R B B B" Rows7-10 dots. So intrusion length is 4 rows above stratum: tip R at row2 (two rows above stratum? Actually stratum row is row6, so rows above are 1-5. Tip at row2, then B at rows3-5 (three B's). So total length 4 rows (including tip). In example1, tip at row1, B at rows2-3 (two B's) total 3 rows. So length varies. Maybe intrusion length equals number of same-colored deposits in stratum row? In example2, there is one R deposit, and there are 3 B's above? Not. Maybe intrusion length equals the distance to the nearest other deposit of same type? Not. Let's examine Example3. Input: 9 rows, 9 c ... [8435 chars truncated]
"Spices pressed into a roll of dough bloom upward when the heat hits, each releasing its aromatic tower at a height that matches its potency."
120b: k=3
See: A long roll of uniform dough stretches across the baking sheet, with distinctly colored spice plugs pressed into it at various points.
Do: When baked, each spice plug sends a rising column of infused dough upward, crowned by the spice itself. Stronger spices push higher columns than milder ones.
Grid: The original roll stays flat. Columns of dough rise perpendicular from the spice locations, each topped with the spice color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "long roll of uniform dough stretches across the baking sheet, with distinctly colored spice plugs pressed into it at various points. When baked, each spice plug sends a rising column of infused dough upward, crowned by the spice itself. Stronger spices push higher columns than milder ones. Grid details: The original roll stays flat. Columns of dough rise perpendicular from the spice locations, each topped with the spice color." Interpretation: Input grid has a row of colored cells (spice plugs) somewhere (maybe a row of non-blank). The rest are empty (black .). Output: For each spice cell, we create a vertical column upward from that cell (i.e., above it) with the same color? But "crowned by the spice itself" suggests the topmost cell is the spice color, and below maybe some other color (dough) maybe same as something else? In examples, the columns are of the same color as the spice? Let's examine. Example1: Input grid size? 9 rows, 6 columns. Row with B A B B B B is row index 3 (0-index?). Output: The same row unchanged. Above it, there are columns: At column 1 (0-index?), there is A at row0? Let's map. Input Example1 grid (rows 0-8): 0: . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . 3: B A B B B B 4: . . . . . . 5: . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . Output: 0: . A . . . . 1: . B . . . . 2: . B . . . . 3: B A B B B B 4-8: all . rows. So columns: At column0 (B) there is no column above (just .). At column1 (A) there is A at row0 (top), and B at rows1-2? Wait column1 output rows: row0 A, row1 B, row2 B, row3 A (original). So above the A plug, there is a column of B? Actually B is a different color (blue). The rule maybe: each spice plug pushes a column of the "dough" which is the most common color? Let's see. The row has B and A. B is blue, A azure. The column above A is A at top, then B's below (two rows). The column above B (col0) is just . (no column). Column2 (B) also no column? Actually output column2 rows0-2 are . . . . So only columns where there is A? Wait column0 is B but no column. Column2 is B no column. Column3 B no column. Column4 B no column. Column5 B no column. So only column1 (A) got a column. Why? Maybe because A is "stronger spice" than B? The description: stronger spices push higher columns than milder ones. So maybe we sort by strength: A > B? So A pushes column up to top of grid (or until blocked). B maybe pushes less height, maybe zero? But in example2, we have row of B B B R B B B. Output shows column above R (red) with R at row1 (top?), and B's above B's? Let's examine. Example2 input: 10 rows, 7 columns. Row with B B B R B B B is row5 (0-index). Output rows: 0: . . . . . . . 1: . . . R . . . 2: . . . B . . . 3: . . . B . . . 4: . . . B . . . 5: B B B R B B B 6-9: all . rows. So column index 3 (R) has R at row1, B at rows2-4, original R at row5. So above R, there is a column of B (the milder spice) of height 3 (rows2-4). Above B's (other columns) there ... [8739 chars truncated]
"Notes embedded in a drone string resonate upward, each pitch sustaining harmonics whose overtone count depends on the instrument that produced it."
120b: k=4
See: A sustained drone hums across one line, with certain positions colored by distinct tonal signatures breaking the monotone.
Do: Each tonal signature vibrates and projects a stack of harmonic overtones away from the drone. The number of overtones varies by timbre — some voices ring longer than others.
Grid: The drone line persists unchanged. Overtone stacks extend perpendicular from each colored position, with the original tone at the far end.
We need to infer rule. From description: "drone line persists unchanged. Overtone stacks extend perpendicular from each colored position, with the original tone at the far end." So there is a line (row) that stays same (the input row with many colors). In examples, that line is somewhere (maybe row 4 in ex1, row 6 in ex2, row 8 in ex3, row 10 in ex4). Indeed each input has a row of many colored cells (non-.) that remains unchanged in output at same location. The other colored cells appear above that line (or below?) as stacks extending perpendicular (vertical) from each colored position, with original tone at far end (i.e., the original colored cell is at the far end of the stack, away from the drone line). Let's examine. Example1: Input grid 9 rows, 6 columns. Row index (0-based) maybe 3 (fourth row) has B A B B B B. Output: same row unchanged. Above that row, there are new colored cells: At column 1 (0-index?), there is A at row0 col1? Let's map. Input ex1 grid (9x6). Row0-2 all dots. Row3: B A B B B B. Row4-8 all dots. Output: Row0: . A . . . . (so A appears at column1 row0). Row1: . B . . . . (B at column1 row1). Row2: . B . . . . (B at column1 row2). Row3 unchanged. Others dots. So from the original row, there were colored cells at columns 0-5: B A B B B B. For each colored cell, we create a vertical stack extending upward (since drone line persists, stacks extend perpendicular away from the drone). The original tone at far end: meaning the original colored cell is at the far end of the stack, i.e., the stack goes away from the line, ending with the original color at the far end? Wait in example, original A at column1 row3. In output, we have A at row0 col1 (far end) and B's at rows1-2 col1? Actually original A is at row3 col1. In output, there is A at row0 col1 (far end) and B's at rows1-2 col1. But original A is not present at row3 col1? Wait row3 unchanged includes A at col1. So original A remains at row3 col1 (the drone line). The stack extends upward from that position, with original tone at far end? But the far end is the topmost cell (row0 col1) which is A, same color as original. However we also have B's above? Actually B's are at rows1-2 col1, not same color as original. So maybe the stack consists of the same color as the original at the far end, and intermediate cells are the color of the nearest other colored cell? Let's examine. Original row: columns: 0 B,1 A,2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B. In output, column0: there is no new cells above (since column0 maybe not). Actually output row0 col0 is '.'; row1 col0 '.'; row2 col0 '.'; So column0 no stack. Column1: we have A at row0, B at rows1-2. Column2: no stack? Output row0 col2 '.'; row1 col2 '.'; row2 col2 '.'; So only column1 got stack. Why? Because maybe only the A (azure) triggers a stack of length equal to its "overtones" (maybe number of same color elsewhere?). Let's examine other examples. Example2: Input 10 rows, 7 columns. Row5 (index5) has B B B R B B B. Output: same row unchanged ... [10624 chars truncated]
"Players standing in a scrimmage line break formation at the whistle — each position sprints a different number of yards depending on their jersey color."
120b: k=3
See: A scrimmage line of uniformly dressed players stretches across the field, with a few wearing distinctly colored jerseys mixed in.
Do: At the whistle, each uniquely jersied player sprints perpendicular to the line, trailing teammates behind them. The sprint distance depends on the jersey color.
Grid: The scrimmage line remains. Each sprinting player leaves a trail of teammates connecting back to the line, with the colored jersey at the lead.
We need to infer rule. From description: "scrimmage line of uniformly dressed players stretches across the field, with a few wearing distinctly colored jerseys mixed in." The line is a row of uniform color? In examples, the line is a row of B's (blue) with some other colors (A azure, R red) interspersed. The line remains unchanged in output (the row stays same). Then each uniquely jersied player (non-uniform color) sprints perpendicular to the line, trailing teammates behind them. Sprint distance depends on jersey color. So they move vertically (perpendicular) away from line, leaving a trail of B's (the uniform color) connecting back to line, with the colored jersey at the lead (farther from line). So we need to map each colored cell (non-B) in the line to a column where we place a vertical line of B's extending from the line upward (or maybe both directions?) and the colored cell at the far end. Look at Example1: Input grid 9 rows, 6 columns. The line is row 4 (0-index? Actually row index 3 if starting 0). Row: B A B B B B. So uniform B with one A at column 2 (0-index 1). Output: The line unchanged at row 4. Above it, there is a vertical column of B's and A at top? Let's see output rows: Row0: . A . . . . Row1: . B . . . . Row2: . B . . . . Row3: B A B B B B (line) Rows4-8 all dots. So A is at row0 column1 (same column as A in line). B's at rows1-2 column1. So the trail length is 2 B's plus A at top. How determined? Color A maybe distance 3? Actually there are 3 cells above line: rows0-2. The colored A is at topmost (row0). So distance from line = 3 rows (including A? Actually line at row3, A at row0 => distance 3 rows upward). So maybe A's sprint distance = 3? Let's test Example2. Example2: Input grid 10 rows, 7 columns. Line at row5: B B B R B B B (R at column3). Output: line unchanged row5. Above line, there is vertical column at column3: rows1-4 have R at row1? Wait output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . Row1: . . . R . . . Row2: . . . B . . . Row3: . . . B . . . Row4: . . . B . . . Row5: B B B R B B B So R at row1 column3 (top). B's at rows2-4 column3. That's 3 B's below R, then line at row5. So distance from line to R is 4 rows (rows1-4 are 4 rows? Actually line row5, R row1 => distance 4 rows). So R sprint distance maybe 4? Let's see color mapping: R maybe distance 4. In Example1, A distance 3. So each color has a fixed sprint length. Example3: Input grid 9 rows, 9 columns. Line at row7: B A B B B A B R B (positions: col0 B, col1 A, col2 B, col3 B, col4 B, col5 A, col6 B, col7 R, col8 B). Output shows vertical columns above line for each non-B (A at col1, A at col5, R at col7). Let's examine output rows: Rows0-2 all dots. Row3: . . . . . . . . R . Row4: . A . . . A . B . Row5: . B . . . B . B . Row6: . B . . . B . B . Row7: B A B B B A B R B Rows8 all dots. Let's map columns: col1: A at row4, B's at rows5-6? Actually row5 col1 is B, row6 col1 is B. So A at row4, B's at rows5-6, line at row7. So distance from line to A = 3 rows ( ... [4662 chars truncated]
"Storm cells embedded in a pressure front push updrafts of different heights — warm cells climb higher than cool ones before condensing."
120b: k=3
See: A long pressure front stretches across the atmosphere, mostly uniform but with distinct thermal anomalies embedded at certain points.
Do: Each thermal anomaly drives an updraft column perpendicular to the front. The column's height depends on the anomaly's thermal signature, with the anomaly type visible at the cloud top.
Grid: The front stays in place. Updraft columns extend from each anomaly position, topped by the anomaly's color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "long pressure front stretches across the atmosphere, mostly uniform but with distinct thermal anomalies embedded at certain points." The front is a row of something? In examples, there is a row of many B's (blue) maybe representing front. In example1 input: 9 rows? Actually grid 9 rows x6 columns. Row4 (0-index?) is "B A B B B B". That's the front: mostly B with some A anomalies. Output shows columns above that row: at positions where anomalies (A) in front, we have vertical column upward with the anomaly color at top? Let's see example1 output: The front row unchanged. Above it, there are columns: At column2 (0-index?) front row has A at column2? Input row4: B A B B B B (positions 0-5). So A at col1. Output shows at row0 col1 = A (top). Row1 col0? Wait output grid: rows 0-8. Output row0: ". A . . . .". So A at col1 top. Row1: ". B . . . .". That's B at col1? Actually row1 col1 = B. Row2: ". B . . . .". Row3 is front row unchanged. So column of B's below A? The column includes B's directly above front? Let's examine: The front row has B at col0, A at col1, B at col2-5. The column above col1 shows A at top row0, then B at rows1-2, then front row row3 has A. So the column consists of the anomaly color at top (A) and then B's filling down until reaching the front row where the anomaly sits (A). So the B's are the front color (B) filling the column between top and front (excluding front). Similarly, example2: front row is row5: "B B B R B B B". Anomaly is R at col3. Output shows column above: row1 col3 = R (top), rows2-4 col3 = B (front color). Indeed output rows: row1 ". . . R . . .", row2 ". . . B . . .", row3 ". . . B . . .", row4 ". . . B . . .". So same pattern. Example3: front row is row7: "B A B B B A B R B". Multiple anomalies: A at col1, A at col5, R at col7. Output shows columns above each anomaly. Let's verify: Output rows: row3 has R at col7 (top). Row4 has A at col1 and A at col5? Actually row4 ". A . . . A . B .". Yes A at col1 and col5, and B at col7? Wait row4 col7 = B? Actually row4 shows ". A . . . A . B .": positions: col0 ., col1 A, col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 A, col6 ., col7 B, col8 . . So B at col7 (just below top R column). Row5: ". B . . . B . B .": B at col1? Actually col1 B, col5 B, col7 B. Row6: ". B . . . B . B .": same. So pattern: For each anomaly (non-B) in front row, we create a vertical column upward: top cell is the anomaly color, cells below (until just above front row) are filled with front color B. If multiple anomalies, columns may overlap? Not here. Thus rule: Identify the row that contains the most B's? The front is the row that is all B except some other colors. In all examples, there is exactly one row with many B's (and anomalies). That row stays unchanged. For each non-B cell in that row, create a vertical column upward: fill cells above that row in same column with B, except the topmost cell (the highest row) gets the anomaly color. The height of column seems to ... [7651 chars truncated]
"Keystones set into a foundation wall dictate how tall their supporting columns must be — marble keystones demand shorter columns than granite ones."
120b: k=2
See: A foundation wall of uniform brick runs across the site, with a few distinctly colored keystones mortared into specific positions.
Do: From each keystone, a column rises perpendicular to the wall. The column height is determined by the keystone material, with a matching capstone placed at the top.
Grid: The wall remains intact. Columns of brick rise from keystone positions, each crowned with a capstone matching the keystone's color.
We need to infer rule. From description: foundation wall of uniform brick runs across site, with few colored keystones mortared into specific positions. From each keystone, a column rises perpendicular to wall. Column height determined by keystone material, with matching capstone placed at top. The wall remains intact. Columns of brick rise from keystone positions, each crowned with a capstone matching keystone's color. Interpretation: Input grid has a row of bricks (maybe B?) representing wall? In examples, there is a row of many B's (blue) across middle. That's the wall. The keystones are other colors placed on that wall row. In example1, input: row 4 (0-index?) has B A B B B B (so a row of B's with an A at column 2?). Actually row index 3 (since 0-index) has B A B B B B. That's the wall row. The rest rows are empty (.) . Output shows columns rising upward from keystone positions: For each keystone (non-B) on wall row, we create a vertical column upward (i.e., above the wall) of bricks (B) of height determined by keystone material, and a capstone (same color as keystone) at top. In example1, keystone is A at column 1 (0-index?). Input row: B A B B B B (positions 0-5). So A at column1. Output: we see column of B's above that A: At row0 col1 is A (capstone). Row1 col1 is B. Row2 col1 is B. Row3 is the wall row unchanged. So height of column is 2 bricks plus capstone? Actually there are 2 B's below A (rows1 and2) then wall row at row3. So total column height (including capstone) = 3? The rule says column height determined by keystone material. For A (azure) maybe height = 3? Let's check example2. Example2 input: wall row is row5 (0-index) with B B B R B B B (R at column3). Output shows column above: At row1 col3 is R (capstone). Rows2-4 col3 are B's (three B's). So there are 3 B's below capstone before wall row at row5. So total height = 4 (including capstone). So R leads to height 4? Let's see. Thus mapping: each keystone color corresponds to a specific column height (number of B bricks below capstone). Need to deduce mapping for colors present: A gave height 3 (including capstone? Actually capstone plus 2 B's). R gave height 4 (capstone + 3 B's). So maybe height = numeric value of color? Could be based on alphabetical order? A=1? Not matching. Could be based on color's position in rainbow? Not. Maybe the height equals the number of letters in color name? "azure" length 5? Not 3. "red" length 3? Not 4. Maybe each color corresponds to a specific integer predetermined by puzzle (like ARC tasks). Need to infer from limited data. Only two examples. But maybe rule: column height equals the number of occurrences of that color in the entire input? In example1, only one A present, so height maybe 1? Not. Maybe height equals distance to nearest edge? Not. Let's examine example2: only one R keystone. Height 4. Could be based on row index of keystone? In example2, wall row is at row5 (0-index). The column extends upward until row1 (since capstone a ... [6682 chars truncated]
"Signal flares lodged in a trench wall launch at different altitudes depending on the order they encode — reconnaissance flares arc lower than artillery calls."
120b: k=2
See: A fortified trench line stretches across the battlefield, uniform except for colored signal flares embedded at intervals.
Do: Each flare fires perpendicular to the trench, trailing smoke behind it. The altitude reached depends on the flare's color, with the flare visible at the apex.
Grid: The trench remains. Smoke trails extend from each flare position, with the colored flare at the far end.
We need to infer rule. From description: trench line uniform except colored signal flares embedded at intervals. Input shows a row of many B's with some other colors (A, R). That's trench line. Output shows vertical columns of smoke trails extending upward from each flare, with colored flare at far end (apex). In example1: Input row: B A B B B B at row index? Let's map coordinates. Input grid size 9 rows x6 columns? Actually given 9 rows each with 6 entries. The trench row is row 4 (0-index maybe). Output shows same trench unchanged, and above it there are vertical lines: For each column where there is a non-B? Let's see. Example1 Input: Rows: 0: . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . 3: B A B B B B 4: . . . . . . 5: . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . Output: 0: . A . . . . 1: . B . . . . 2: . B . . . . 3: B A B B B B 4-8: all dots. So trench row is row3 (0-index). At column1 (0-index) there is A in trench. In output, above trench at column1 row0 is A (apex). And rows1-2 column1 have B (smoke). So smoke is B (blue) trailing from flare upward, with flare color at apex (A). Also column0 had B in trench but not a flare? Actually trench has B at column0, but output above column0 row0 is '.' not B. So only for non-B colors? In trench row, there are B's and A. The A is a flare. The smoke is B (blue) placed above it, extending until maybe hits top or until some condition. In example1, there are 3 rows of smoke (rows1-2 plus apex row0). Actually apex row0 is A, then rows1-2 are B. That's 2 B rows. How many? The distance from trench to top is 3 rows (rows0-2). So they filled all rows above trench with B, except the topmost replaced by flare color? Wait apex is A at row0, not B. So they placed flare color at topmost cell of column, and fill all cells between trench (exclusive) and apex (exclusive?) with B. So basically propagate upward until reaching top edge, placing B in all intermediate cells, and place the original flare color at the topmost cell. Check example2: Input grid 10 rows x7 columns? Actually given 10 rows each 7 columns. Trench row is row5 (0-index). Row5: B B B R B B B. So there is a R flare at column3. Output shows vertical column at column3: rows0-4? Let's see output rows: 0: . . . . . . . 1: . . . R . . . 2: . . . B . . . 3: . . . B . . . 4: . . . B . . . 5: B B B R B B B 6-9: all dots. So apex row1 column3 is R (flare). Rows2-4 column3 are B (smoke). Row0 column3 is '.' (empty). So why not fill to top? The trench is at row5, there are rows0-4 above. They placed flare at row1, not row0. So maybe the altitude depends on flare color: different colors have different heights. In example1, A flare reached top (row0). In example2, R flare reached row1 (height 4 above trench? Actually trench row5, apex row1 => distance 4 rows above trench (rows4,3,2,1). So smoke occupies rows2-4 (3 cells). So total height (including flare) = 4 rows above trench. For R, altitude maybe 4? For A, altitude maybe 5? Let's compute: g ... [5663 chars truncated]
"Trapdoors in the stage floor spring open and raise performers on lifts — lead actors rise higher than the chorus, each standing on a pillar of light matching their spotlight color."
120b: k=3
See: The stage floor stretches as a uniform platform with distinctly colored trapdoor markers at certain positions.
Do: Each trapdoor activates, raising a column from below. The height of the lift depends on the marker color, with the performer's spotlight visible at the top.
Grid: The stage floor stays level. Columns extend perpendicular from each trapdoor, topped by the marker's color.
We need to infer rule. From description: stage floor uniform, trapdoor markers at certain positions. Each trapdoor activates raising a column from below. Height depends on marker color, with performer spotlight visible at top. So output shows vertical columns of same color extending upward from the marker row? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input grid size? Input shows 9 rows, 6 columns. Row indices 0-8. The row with markers is row3 (0-index). Row3: B A B B B B. Output: we see same row unchanged. Above that, there are columns of colors: At column1 (index0) there is B at row2? Actually output rows: row0: . A . . . . ; row1: . B . . . . ; row2: . B . . . . ; row3: B A B B B B ; rows4-8 all dots. So from marker row (row3) we have columns upward: For each marker in row3, we create a vertical column above it (i.e., rows decreasing) of same color? Let's see: column0 marker B, output above rows0-2 at column0 are . . . (all dots). So no column for B? Wait column0 above is dot. So maybe only certain colors produce columns: A (azure) produced column of A upward? Actually column1 marker A, output above rows0-2 column1: row0 A, row1 B, row2 B. That's not just A. Hmm. Let's map: Input row3: columns: 0 B,1 A,2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B. Output above row3: Row0: . A . . . . Row1: . B . . . . Row2: . B . . . . So column1 (A) produced A at row0, B at rows1-2? That's weird. Maybe columns are built based on distance from marker to top? Actually maybe each marker lifts a column of its own color, but the topmost cell (spotlight) is a different color? The description: "height of the lift depends on the marker color, with the performer's spotlight visible at the top." So maybe each color corresponds to a height (number of cells) and the top cell is a different color (maybe the same as marker? Not sure). Let's examine Example2. Example2 input: 10 rows, 7 columns. Row5 (0-index) has B B B R B B B. Output: same row unchanged. Above rows0-4 have a vertical column at column3 (R) and column? Let's see output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . Row1: . . . R . . . Row2: . . . B . . . Row3: . . . B . . . Row4: . . . B . . . Row5: B B B R B B B Rows6-9 all dots. So only column3 (index3) which had R marker produced a column: at row1 R, rows2-4 B. So top cell is R (same as marker), below cells are B (maybe base color?). The column height is 4 cells above marker? Actually marker row is row5. The column extends upward to row1 (4 rows above). That's height 4? The marker color R maybe determines height? Let's see: In Example1, marker A produced column of height 3? Actually rows0-2 above row3 (3 rows). So height 3. Marker B maybe height 0 (no column). So maybe each color maps to a specific height: A -> 3, R -> 4, B -> 0? Let's test Example3. Example3 input: 9 rows, 9 columns. Row7 (index7) has B A B B B A B R B. Output: same row unchanged. Above rows0-6 have columns for certain markers. Output rows (0-index): Row0: all dots Row1: all dots Row2: all dots Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: ... [5871 chars truncated]
"Seeds of different species planted along an irrigation channel send shoots upward — sunflowers reach taller than marigolds, each bloom showing its true color at the tip."
120b: k=2
See: An irrigation channel runs across the garden bed, with differently colored seeds planted at certain intervals along it.
Do: Each seed germinates and sends a stem upward from the channel. The stem height depends on the seed variety, with the flower's color appearing at the top.
Grid: The channel remains. Stems of uniform green rise from each seed position, capped by the flower color.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1 input grid 9 rows? Let's count: Input shows 9 rows? Actually lines: ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "B A B B B B" ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." That's 9 rows, 6 columns. Output: ". A . . . ." ". B . . . ." ". B . . . ." "B A B B B B" ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." So original channel row is row4 (index starting 1). It contains B A B B B B. In output, that row unchanged. Above it, there are stems: at column2 (where A is) we have A at row1? Actually output row1 col2 = A. Row2 col2 = B. Row3 col2 = B. So vertical column above the A seed: topmost cell (row1) is A (flower color), below that B (stem color) repeated? Wait stem color is uniform green according to description, but output shows B (blue) as stem? Let's examine: The seed at column2 is A (azure). In output, above it we have A at row1, B at rows2-3. So stem color is B (blue) not green. Hmm maybe stem color is the color of the seed to the left? Let's see other seeds: In row4, there are B at columns1,3,4,5,6. In output, above column1 there is '.' (nothing). Above column3-6 also '.' So only column2 got a stem. Why? Because maybe only seeds that are not same as neighbor? Let's examine example2. Example2 input: 10 rows? Actually lines: 10 rows, 7 columns. Row6 has "B B B R B B B". Output: same row unchanged. Above it, there is a vertical column at column4 (where R is). Output rows2-5 column4: row2 col4 = R, rows3-5 col4 = B. So similar pattern: topmost is the seed color (R), below are B (blue) stems. So rule: For each non-blue seed? Wait seed at column4 is R (red). The stem color is B (blue). In example1, seed at column2 is A (azure). Stem color is B (blue). So stems are always B (blue). So maybe B is the "stem" color always, regardless of seed. The topmost cell is the seed's original color (the flower). The stem extends upward from the channel until hitting top row? In examples, the stem length is 3 rows above channel? In example1, channel row is row4, stems occupy rows1-3 (3 cells). In example2, channel row is row6, stems occupy rows2-5 (4 cells). Wait count: rows2-5 inclusive is 4 rows above channel (since channel row6). Actually output rows2-5 column4 have: row2 R, rows3-5 B. That's 1+3 =4 cells above channel. In example1, rows1-3 column2 have: row1 A, rows2-3 B (2 B's). That's 1+2 =3 cells above channel. So stem length varies maybe based on something else: maybe distance to next seed? In example1, there is only one seed (A) among B's. The channel row has B A B B B B. The seed at column2 is A, but there are B's to left and right. The stem length maybe equals number of consecutive B's to left? Not sure. Let's compute: In example1, channel row index 4. Above it, there are rows1-3 empty originally. Output placed stem of length 3 (including flower). In example2, channel row index 6. Above rows1-5 empty originally. Output placed stem of length 4 (including flo ... [10074 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains a horizontal red line spanning the full width of the grid, a set of yellow dots scattered on the black background (some above the red line, some below it), and otherwise empty black cells.
Do: 1. Shift every yellow dot down by exactly one row. The red line remains fixed in place. 2. After shifting, check each yellow dot that is now positioned exactly one row above the red line. For each such dot, generate a V-shaped bounce pattern: place additional yellow dots along two diagonal paths extending upward from that dot's position — one going up-left (row-1, col-1 per step) and one going up-right (row-1, col+1 per step). Continue each diagonal path until it exits the grid boundary. 3. Yellow dots that are not exactly one row above the red line after shifting (whether above or below the red line) simply remain at their new shifted position with no bounce effect. 4. All other cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid dimensions and the position of the red horizontal line vary across instances. The background is black (.). The red line always spans the full width of the grid. Yellow dots may appear anywhere above or below the red line. The coordinate system is row-column with row 0 at the top.
"Raindrops fall toward a drumhead and splash upward on impact"
120b: k=1
See: Yellow raindrops hang suspended in a dark sky above and below a taut red drumhead stretched across the world. The air is still, everything frozen mid-fall.
Do: Gravity pulls each raindrop one step closer to the earth. The red drumhead is anchored and never moves. Any drop that lands right on the drumhead's edge erupts into a V-shaped splash — twin arcs of yellow spray flying up-left and up-right, each droplet one step further along the diagonal until it escapes the sky. Drops that are still drifting through open air, or that have already passed beneath the drum, simply settle into their new resting place — no splash, no fanfare.
Grid: The dark sky (black) can stretch to any height or width. The red drumhead always runs its full width like a horizon line, dividing above from below. Yellow raindrops may float anywhere in the sky or sit beneath the drum. The world is read top-to-bottom, left-to-right.
We need to infer rule. From description: red drumhead is a full-width row of R that never moves. Yellow raindrops (Y) fall one step down (gravity) unless they hit the drumhead edge? Actually "any drop that lands right on the drumhead's edge erupts into a V-shaped splash — twin arcs of yellow spray flying up-left and up-right, each droplet one step further along the diagonal until it escapes the sky." So if a Y is directly above a R cell? The drumhead edge maybe the boundary between R row and the row above? The "edge" maybe the cell directly above a R? When a Y moves down onto a R cell? But R cells are occupied, can't have Y there. So maybe when Y is directly above R, after moving down it would land on R, causing splash: the Y disappears and creates two Y's moving diagonally up-left and up-right from that point (the edge). They continue moving diagonally outward each step until they exit grid (i.e., go beyond top row). In example, we can test. Let's parse example 1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 12 rows? Actually list: rows: 1 . Y . . . . . . ; 2 . . . . . Y . . ; 3 . . . . . . . . ; 4 . . . . . . . . ;5 . . Y . . . . . ;6 . . . . . . . . ;7 . . . . . . . . ;8 . . . . Y . . . ;9 . . . . . . . . ;10 R R R R R R R R ;11 . . . Y . . . . ;12 . . . . . . . . . Wait row 12 maybe . . . . . . . . (but they show . . . . . . . .). Actually output also 12 rows. So drumhead at row 10 (index 10). Y's above and below. In output, Y's have moved down one step (gravity) except those that hit drumhead? Let's see. Input Y positions: (1,2) row1 col2 (0-index?). Row2 col6. Row5 col3. Row8 col5. Row11 col4. After transformation output Y positions: Row2 col2? Actually output row2: ". Y . . . . . ." => Y at col2 row2 (was row1 col2 moved down 1). Good. Row3: ". . . . . Y . ." => Y at col6 row3 (was row2 col6 moved down 1). Good. Row5: "Y . . . . . . ." => Y at col1 row5 (was row5 col3? Wait row5 col3 moved down? Actually row5 col3 moved down to row6? Let's see output row6: ". Y Y . . . . Y". Row6 has Y at col2, col3, col8. Row5 has Y at col1. So original Y at row5 col3 moved down to row6 col3? But output row6 col3 is Y indeed. Also there is Y at row6 col2 maybe from something else (splash). And Y at row6 col8 maybe from splash. Original Y at row8 col5 moved down to row9 col5? Output row9: ". . . . Y . . ." => Y at col5 row9. Yes. Original Y at row11 col4 (below drumhead) moves down? Row11 is below drumhead (row10). Gravity still applies? It says drops that are still drifting through open air, or that have already passed beneath the drum, simply settle into their new resting place — no splash. So they also move down one step? Row11 col4 moves to row12 col4. Output row12: ". . . Y . . . ." => Y at col4 row12. Yes. Now what about splash? Need to see extra Y's created: output row6 col2, row6 col8, row7 col3? Actually output row7: ". . Y . . . Y ." => Y at col3 and col7. Row8: ". . . Y . Y . ." => Y at col4 and col6. Row6 c ... [9573 chars truncated]
"Spores drift downward through the air until they encounter a nutrient-rich membrane, where they germinate and send branching hyphae spreading upward in opposite diagonal directions"
120b: k=2
See: A horizontal membrane of red tissue stretches across the culture. Scattered yellow spores float in the medium above and below it.
Do: Each spore sinks one layer closer to the membrane. Any spore that settles directly against the membrane germinates instantly, shooting two filaments that climb away at opposing angles until they reach the edge of the dish. Spores farther from the membrane simply settle without germinating.
Grid: The red membrane is a fixed horizontal band. Yellow marks represent spores and their filaments. Black is empty medium.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have a horizontal red membrane (row of R). In inputs, there is a row of R somewhere (maybe not top). Yellow spores (Y) above and below. The rule: each spore moves one layer closer to membrane (i.e., one row towards the R row). If after moving, it ends up directly adjacent (i.e., next to) the membrane (i.e., the cell just above or below the R row), then it "germinates" and shoots two filaments that climb away at opposing angles until they reach edge of dish. Filaments are also Y? In output, we see Y marks representing spores and filaments. Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: Provided input lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." That's 12 rows, 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-11, columns 0-7. R row is row 9 (0-index). So membrane at row9. Now spores Y positions in input: Row0 col1 Row1 col5 Row4 col2 Row7 col4 Row10 col3 Also maybe others? That's all. Now apply rule: each spore moves one layer closer to membrane. For spores above membrane (rows <9), they move down one row (increase row index). For spores below membrane (rows >9), they move up one row (decrease row index). In this example, all Y are above membrane except row10 col3 which is below (since row10 >9). So: - Row0 col1 moves to row1 col1. - Row1 col5 moves to row2 col5. - Row4 col2 moves to row5 col2. - Row7 col4 moves to row8 col4. - Row10 col3 moves to row9? Wait row10 is below membrane, moving up one row to row9 col3, which is the membrane row (R). But rule says spore settles directly against the membrane (i.e., adjacent, not on top of it). Actually "directly against the membrane" meaning the cell adjacent to the membrane, not overlapping. Since membrane occupies row9, the cell directly above row9 is row8, directly below is row10. So spore moving from row10 to row9 would be overlapping membrane, which likely not allowed. Maybe spores below move up one row, but if they are one row away (i.e., row10 is directly below membrane), moving up would place them on membrane? In example, row10 col3 is one row below membrane (distance 1). After moving, it would be adjacent? Wait distance before moving: row10 is distance 1 from membrane (row9). After moving one layer closer, it would be at row9? That would be on membrane, maybe not allowed. Perhaps rule: spores move one layer towards membrane, but if they are already adjacent, they stay? Let's see output to infer. Look at output Y positions. Output rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . ." Row1: ". Y . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . Y . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . ." Row4: "Y . . . . . . ." Row5: ". Y Y . . . . Y" Row6: ". . Y . . . Y ." Row7: ". . . Y . Y . ." Row8: ". . . . Y . . ." Row9: "R R R R R R R R" Row10: ". . . . . . . ." Row11: ... [9311 chars truncated]
"Drifting stars are pulled one orbit closer to the accretion disk; any star that grazes the disk erupts into twin jets streaming diagonally outward in opposite directions to the edge of the nebula"
120b: k=3
See: A red accretion disk spans the width of the nebula. Yellow stars drift at various distances above and below the disk.
Do: Each star falls one orbital layer inward. A star arriving just above the disk triggers bipolar jets that shoot diagonally outward in opposite directions until they exit the nebula. Stars farther from the disk simply drift without erupting.
Grid: Red is the accretion disk. Yellow marks stars and jet trails. Black is empty space.
We need to infer rule. From description: red accretion disk spans width of nebula (a row of R). Yellow stars above and below. Each star falls one orbital layer inward (i.e., moves one row towards the red row). A star arriving just above the disk triggers bipolar jets that shoot diagonally outward in opposite directions until they exit the nebula. Stars farther from the disk simply drift without erupting. Interpretation: Input grid has R row somewhere (maybe not at bottom). Yellow Y positions above and below. The transformation: each Y moves one step towards the R row (i.e., vertical direction). If a Y is directly adjacent to R after moving (i.e., ends up just above the R row), then it triggers jets: from that Y position, we draw Y along diagonals outward (both down-left and down-right? Wait "bipolar jets that shoot diagonally outward in opposite directions until they exit the nebula." If star is just above the disk, jets go diagonally outward in opposite directions. Since star is above disk, jets likely go upward? Actually "bipolar jets" from accretion disk are perpendicular to disk, but here they say star arriving just above the disk triggers jets that shoot diagonally outward in opposite directions until they exit the nebula. So from that star location (just above R), we draw Y along both diagonal directions away from the disk (i.e., up-left and up-right) until hitting grid edge. That matches examples? Let's test. Example 2: Input grid 10 rows? Actually given 10 rows? Let's map. Example2 Input (10 rows? Actually list shows 10 rows). Let's index rows from top 0. Rows: 0: . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . 2: . Y . . . . 3: . . . . Y . 4: . . . . . . 5: R R R R R R 6: . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . Output rows: 0: Y . . . . . 1: . Y . . . . 2: . . Y . . . 3: . Y . Y . Y 4: . . . . Y . 5: R R R R R R 6-9: all dots. Let's analyze. Original Y at (2,1) (row2 col1). Original Y at (3,4). R row at row5. Stars fall one layer inward: they move one row towards R row (downwards because they are above). So Y at (2,1) moves to (3,1). Y at (3,4) moves to (4,4). After moving, check if any Y ends up just above R row (i.e., row4). The Y at (4,4) is just above R (row5). So triggers jets diagonally outward. From (4,4), jets go up-left and up-right? Wait outward from disk would be away from disk, i.e., upward direction (since disk below). Diagonal outward would be up-left and up-right. So we would fill Y along those diagonals from (4,4) upward until edge. Let's compute: up-left: (3,3), (2,2), (1,1), (0,0). up-right: (3,5) (col5), (2,6) out of bounds (since width 6). So up-right only (3,5). Also maybe also down-left/down-right? But "bipolar jets that shoot diagonally outward in opposite directions" could be both up-left and down-right? Actually opposite directions relative to each other, not necessarily away from disk. Could be one up-left, one down-right (i.e., opposite). But they say "just above the disk triggers bipolar jets that shoot dia ... [10570 chars truncated]
"Floating lanterns drift one current-step toward the reef; any lantern that reaches the reef breaks apart and its embers ride two diverging wind currents diagonally upward until they vanish over the horizon"
120b: fail
See: A red coral reef stretches across the sea. Yellow paper lanterns float at various distances above and below the reef line.
Do: Each lantern drifts one position toward the reef. A lantern arriving just above the reef bursts, sending embers along two diagonal wind paths diverging upward until they leave the scene. Lanterns that don't reach the reef just drift intact.
Grid: Red is the reef. Yellow marks lanterns and embers. Black is dark water.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid size? Looks like 12 rows? Let's count: Input example lines: 1 ". Y . . . . . ." 2 ". . . . . Y . ." 3 ". . . . . . . ." 4 ". . . . . . . ." 5 ". . Y . . . . ." 6 ". . . . . . . ." 7 ". . . . . . . ." 8 ". . . . Y . . ." 9 ". . . . . . . ." 10 "R R R R R R R R" 11 ". . . Y . . . ." 12 ". . . . . . . ." So 12 rows, 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Interpretation: Red row is reef at row 10 (index 9 zero-based). Yellow lanterns at various positions above and below reef line. In description, lantern drifts one position toward reef (i.e., vertically towards the red row). If lantern arrives just above reef (i.e., moves into row just above red row?), it bursts, sending embers along two diagonal wind paths diverging upward until they leave scene. Lanterns that don't reach reef just drift intact. So rule: For each yellow cell, move it one step vertically towards the red row. If after moving, it ends up directly above the red row (i.e., row just above red row), then it disappears and creates two new yellow cells moving diagonally upward left and right from that position, continuing until hitting top edge? Actually "until they leave the scene". So they propagate upward diagonally until out of grid. Let's test with example. Identify red row at row 10 (index 9). So reef is row 10. Lanterns above (rows <10) will move down one (toward reef). Lanterns below (rows >10) will move up one (toward reef). In example, there are lanterns only above? Let's see input: Y at (row1,col2), row2 col6, row5 col3, row8 col5, row11 col4 (that's below reef? row11 is below row10). So there is one lantern below reef at row11 col4. Now apply rule. First lantern at (1,2) (row1). Moves down to row2 col2. Output shows Y at row2 col2? Output row2: "Y . . . . . . ." yes Y at col1? Wait output row2 is "Y . . . . . . .". That's col1? Actually columns: they show spaces between. Input row1 had ". Y . . . . . ." meaning Y at column2. Output row2 "Y . . . . . . ." Y at column1. Hmm shift left? Let's map. Let's index columns 1-8. Input row1: col2 Y. After moving down one row to row2 col2. But output row2 shows Y at col1. So maybe also shift left? Let's examine other lanterns. Input row2 col6 Y. Moves down to row3 col6. Output row3: ". . . . . Y . ." Y at col6? Output row3 is ". . . . . Y . ." yes col6 matches. So first lantern didn't match. Maybe because after moving, if it ends up directly above reef? Not yet (row2). So why shift left? Let's double-check output row2: ". Y . . . . . ." Wait earlier I mis-copied. Let's look at provided output lines: Output: 1 ". . . . . . . ." 2 ". Y . . . . . ." 3 ". . . . . Y . ." 4 ". . . . . . . ." 5 "Y . . . . . . ." 6 ". Y Y . . . . Y" 7 ". . Y . . . Y ." 8 ". . . Y . Y . ." 9 ". . . . Y . . ." 10 "R R R R R R R R" 11 ". . . . . . . ." 12 ". . . Y . . . ." Let's verify row numbers. Row1 all dots. Row2 has Y at col2. That's the lantern from row1 col2 moved down to row2 co ... [7059 chars truncated]
"Charge carriers drift one step toward the junction; any carrier arriving at the depletion zone recombines and emits two photons that propagate diagonally in opposite directions until they exit the crystal"
120b: fail
See: A red P-N junction stretches across the semiconductor. Yellow charge carriers are distributed above and below the junction.
Do: Each carrier drifts one position toward the junction. A carrier that reaches the layer just above the junction recombines, emitting two photons that travel diagonally apart until they exit the device boundary. Carriers farther away simply drift without recombining.
Grid: Red is the junction. Yellow marks carriers and photon paths. Black is inert substrate.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with rows, seems bottom part has a row of R (red) representing junction. Yellow carriers above and below? In example1 input: grid size? Let's count rows: Input lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." So 12 rows, 8 columns. Red row at row index 9 (0-based?). Carriers Y appear above and also below? Actually there is a Y at row 10 (index 10) column 3? Wait row 11? Let's index: rows 0-11. Row9 is red row. Row10 has ". . . Y . . . ." (a Y below red). Row0-8 are above red. So carriers both above and below. Output grid same size. Let's compare transformation. We need to see rule: each carrier drifts one position toward the junction (red row). If carrier is above red, it moves down one row. If below, moves up one row. Carriers that reach the layer just above the junction (i.e., after moving, they are directly adjacent to red row on the side of carriers? Actually "just above the junction" meaning the row immediately above red row (i.e., row index 8). When a carrier reaches that layer, it recombines, emitting two photons that travel diagonally apart until they exit the device boundary. So the carrier disappears, and two photons appear traveling diagonally away from the junction (presumably upward-left and upward-right if coming from above? Wait carriers above move downwards toward junction; when they reach just above junction (row 8), they recombine and emit photons that travel diagonally apart until they exit. Since they are just above junction, photons would travel upward-left and upward-right? Actually they travel "diagonally apart" maybe away from the junction, i.e., upward-left and upward-right for carriers from above. For carriers from below moving up, they would recombine when they reach just below junction (row 10?) and emit photons traveling diagonally down-left and down-right. Let's test with example1. Identify carriers above red: positions: Row0 col1 (Y) Row1 col5 (Y) Row4 col2 (Y) Row7 col4 (Y) These are above red (row9). After moving down one row, they become: Row1 col1 Row2 col5 Row5 col2 Row8 col4 Now check if any of these are now in row8 (just above red). Row8 is index 8 (since red at 9). Among moved carriers, row8 col4 is indeed just above red. So that carrier recombines, disappears, and emits two photons diagonally apart. Photons travel diagonally until exit. Starting from row8 col4, photons go up-left and up-right? Actually they should travel away from junction, which is downwards direction for carriers above, so photons go upward (away). So up-left: positions (row7 col3), (row6 col2), (row5 col1), (row4 col0) then exit. Up-right: (row7 col5), (row6 col6), (row5 col7), (row4 col8) exit (col8 out of 0-7). So we should see Y at those positions in output. Let's see output grid rows (0-11). Out ... [10892 chars truncated]
"Fallen souls descend one tier toward the River Styx; any soul that touches the river's edge is seized and split into twin wraiths that ascend diagonally toward opposite mountain peaks at the world's rim"
120b: k=1
See: The red River Styx flows horizontally across the underworld. Yellow wandering souls hover at various levels above and below it.
Do: Each soul sinks one level. A soul arriving directly above the river splits into twin wraiths that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they reach the edge of the realm. Souls that don't reach the river simply descend and linger.
Grid: Red is the River Styx. Yellow marks souls and wraith trails. Black is the void.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 12 rows? Let's count: lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." That's 12 rows, each 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Interpretation: Red river is a horizontal line of R across row 10 (0-index?). Indeed row 10 (1-indexed) is the river. Yellow souls at various positions above and below. In output, souls sink one level (move down one row). If a soul is directly above the river (i.e., one row above?), then it splits into twin wraiths that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they reach edge. Wait "directly above the river splits into twin wraiths that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they reach the edge of the realm." So a Y located immediately above the river (row just above) will be replaced by two Y's moving diagonally up-left and up-right? Actually they climb diagonally (i.e., move upward) until edge. Since they start from the position above river? The description: "Each soul sinks one level. A soul arriving directly above the river splits into twin wraiths that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they reach the edge of the realm." So process: first each Y moves down one row (sink). If after moving down, it lands on the river? Actually "arriving directly above the river" means after sinking? Let's think: original Y above river (i.e., one row above) after sinking one level would land on the river row? But river is red, maybe cannot occupy. Instead they split before hitting river? In example, we can examine. Let's map coordinates. Use row index 0-11. River row = 9 (since 0-index). Input Y positions: Row0 col1 (0,1) Row1 col5 (1,5) Row4 col2 (4,2) Row7 col4 (7,4) Also maybe others? That's all. Now output Y positions: Row0 none? Output row0 all . (first line . . . . . . . .) yes. Row1: Y at col1 (1,1) matches original row0 moved down one. Row2: Y at col5 (2,5) matches original row1 moved down one. Row3: none. Row4: Y at col0 (4,0) ??? original row4 col2 moved down one would be row5 col2, not row4. So something else. Row5: Y at col1,2,7 (row5 col1,2,7). Row5 originally row5 is empty. These Y's likely from splitting. Row6: Y at col2,6 (row6 col2,6) Row7: Y at col3,5 (row7 col3,5) Row8: Y at col4 (row8 col4) Row9: river unchanged. Row10: none. Row11: Y at col3 (row11 col3) from original row? Input row10? Actually input row10 has Y at col3 (row10 col3). That is below river (since river row9). So Y below river just sinks one level (down) to row11 col3. Indeed output row11 col3 Y. Now analyze the splitting: original Y at row4 col2 is above river? River row9, so not directly above. So why does it produce many Y's? Wait maybe rule: each Y sinks one level (down). If after sinking, it lands directly above river (i.e., now one row above river), th ... [5731 chars truncated]
"Dancers step one position downstage; any dancer who reaches the ribbon on the floor performs a grand jeté that sends two trailing scarves arcing diagonally upward toward opposite wings"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A red ribbon is laid across the stage floor. Yellow dancers are positioned at various places above and below the ribbon.
Do: Each dancer steps one mark downstage. A dancer arriving just above the ribbon leaps and casts two scarves that arc diagonally upward in opposite directions until they fly offstage. Dancers elsewhere simply step without leaping.
Grid: Red is the ribbon. Yellow marks dancers and scarf trails. Black is empty stage.
"Boulders tumble one stratum downward; any boulder striking the magma intrusion fractures and sends two pyroclastic streams surging diagonally upward through the rock toward opposite surface vents"
120b: k=1
See: A red magma intrusion cuts horizontally through the rock layers. Yellow boulders are lodged at various strata above and below it.
Do: Each boulder drops one stratum. A boulder landing directly above the magma layer fractures on contact, releasing two pyroclastic flows that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they breach the surface. Boulders that don't reach the magma simply settle.
Grid: Red is the magma intrusion. Yellow marks boulders and pyroclastic flows. Black is solid rock.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 12 rows? Let's count: lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." That's 12 rows, each 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Interpretation: Red row is magma intrusion horizontal across entire row (row 10). Yellow are boulders. Rule: each boulder drops one stratum (i.e., moves down one row). If boulder lands directly above magma layer (i.e., after moving down, its new position is just above the red row), it fractures and releases two pyroclastic flows that climb diagonally in opposite directions until they breach the surface (top row). So from that point, we generate Y cells moving up-left and up-right from the fracture point, until reaching top row (row 0). Boulders that don't reach magma simply settle (i.e., after moving down one row, they stay as Y at new location). Also maybe original boulder disappears? In output, we see Y's moved down one row, and some new Y's diagonally upward from those that hit magma. Let's test with example. Identify positions of Y in input (row index 0 top). Let's index rows 0-11. Rows: 0: col1 Y (0,1) 1: col5 Y (1,5) 4: col2 Y (4,2) 7: col4 Y (7,4) Red row is row9 (index 9) all columns. Now apply rule: each Y moves down one row (row+1). So new positions: (1,1) (2,5) (5,2) (8,4) Now check if any of these new positions are directly above magma (i.e., row8? Actually magma at row9, so directly above is row8). So if after moving down, Y ends up at row8 (i.e., original row7). Only the Y originally at row7 col4 moves to row8 col4, which is directly above magma. That one fractures, generating pyroclastic flows that climb diagonally up-left and up-right until top row. From fracture point? The fracture occurs when boulder lands directly above magma layer, i.e., at row8 col4. Then flows go up-left and up-right from that point, moving up one row and left/right each step, marking Y cells, until they breach surface (row0). So we should generate Y at positions: Up-left diagonal: (7,3), (6,2), (5,1), (4,0) then next would be (3,-1) out of bounds stop. Up-right diagonal: (7,5), (6,6), (5,7), (4,8) out of bounds stop. So Y at (7,3),(6,2),(5,1),(4,0) and (7,5),(6,6),(5,7). Also maybe the original boulder at (8,4) remains? In output, let's see. Check output Y positions: List output rows: Row0: all . (no Y) Row1: "Y . . . . . . ." => Y at (1,0)?? Wait output row1: ". Y . . . . . ." Actually output row1 line: ". Y . . . . . ." Let's list rows from output: Row0: ". . . . . . . ." Row1: ". Y . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . Y . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . ." Row4: "Y . . . . . . ." Row5: ". Y Y . . . . Y" Row6: ". . Y . . . Y ." Row7: ". . . Y . Y . ." Row8: ". . . . Y . . ." Row9: "R R R R R R R R" Row10: ". . . . . . . ." Row11: ". . . Y . . . ." Let's map Y coordinates (ro ... [3795 chars truncated]
"Sesame seeds slide down a tilted baking sheet; any seed that reaches the caramel strip sizzles and sends thin sugar threads fanning upward like pulled candy"
120b: fail
See: A sticky caramel bar runs horizontally across the pan. Yellow sesame seeds are sprinkled across the tray above and below the bar.
Do: Every seed slides one position toward the caramel. A seed that comes to rest just touching the caramel melts into it and throws two thin sugar strands diagonally upward in a spreading V until they leave the tray. Seeds that don't reach the bar just settle quietly.
Grid: Red is the caramel strip, yellow marks seeds and sugar strands, black is the bare tray.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 12 rows? Let's count: lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." That's 12 rows, each 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Interpretation: Red row is caramel strip horizontally across pan: appears as a full row of R's. In input, row 10 (0-index?) is the R row. In output, same row unchanged. Yellow seeds are Y. They slide one position toward the caramel (i.e., vertically towards the R row). Caramel is horizontal, so seeds above move down one row; seeds below move up one row? In description: "seed slides one position toward the caramel. A seed that comes to rest just touching the caramel melts into it and throws two thin sugar strands diagonally upward in a spreading V until they leave the tray." So seeds that after moving become adjacent (touching) to caramel (i.e., directly above or below the R row) melt (disappear?) and produce two Y strands diagonally upward (i.e., away from caramel) forming a V shape until they exit grid. In example, we need to see behavior. Let's map coordinates. Use rows 0-11, columns 0-7. Input seeds Y positions: Row0 col1 Row1 col5 Row4 col2 Row7 col4 Row10? actually row9 is R row. Row10 col3 (since ". . . Y . . . .") row10 col3. That's all. Now output Y positions: Row0 none? output row0 all . (first line . . . . . . . .) Row1 col1 (Y) matches seed from row0 moved down one? Actually seed at (0,1) moved down to (1,1) because moving toward caramel (down). Yes. Row2 col5 (Y) matches seed from (1,5) moved down to (2,5). Good. Row4? output row4 has Y at col0 (Y . . . . . . .). That's new: seed from (4,2) moved down to (5,2) maybe? Wait output row5 has Y Y at col1 and col2? Let's list output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . Row1: . Y . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . Y . . Row3: . . . . . . . . Row4: Y . . . . . . . Row5: . Y Y . . . . Y Row6: . . Y . . . Y . Row7: . . . Y . Y . . Row8: . . . . Y . . . Row9: R R R R R R R R Row10: . . . . . . . . Row11: . . . Y . . . . Let's map seeds after transformation. Original seeds: A (0,1) -> moved to (1,1) appears yes. B (1,5) -> moved to (2,5) appears yes. C (4,2) -> moved to (5,2) maybe? Output row5 col2 is Y (since row5 . Y Y . . . . Y: col1 Y, col2 Y, col7 Y). So (5,2) is Y indeed. Also there is Y at (5,1) and (5,7) new. D (7,4) -> moved to (8,4) appears row8 col4 Y yes. E (10,3) is below caramel? Row10 is below row9 caramel (since caramel row9). So seed below moves up one to row9? Actually row9 is caramel, cannot occupy. The rule: seed slides one position toward caramel. If seed is directly adjacent after moving, it melts into caramel and creates V strands upward (diagonally). For seed below caramel, moving up one would bring it to row9 (caramel) which is not allowed; maybe it melts and creates V upward (i.e., ... [10922 chars truncated]
"Notes descend the staff one step at a time; when a note lands on the resonant string, it rings out in harmonics that climb the staff in diverging intervals"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A vibrating red string stretches horizontally across the score. Yellow notes are placed at various positions above and below the string.
Do: Every note steps down one line. A note arriving directly above the string resonates and produces two harmonic overtones that ascend diagonally in opposite directions until they exit the score. Notes that don't reach the string simply rest at their new position in silence.
Grid: The red string is a full-width horizontal line. Yellow dots are notes and harmonics. Black is silence.
"Tennis balls roll toward the net under gravity; any ball that reaches the net tape ricochets upward in a V-shaped split, each half arcing to opposite sidelines"
120b: fail
See: A red net stretches across the full width of the court. Yellow tennis balls are scattered on both sides.
Do: Each ball rolls one space closer to the net. A ball arriving at the net tape splits into two trajectories diverging diagonally upward toward opposite corners until they leave the court. Balls that don't reach the net simply stop one space lower.
Grid: Red is the net tape. Yellow marks balls and their ricochet paths. Black is empty court.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid size? Looks like 12 rows? Let's count rows in example input: lines: 1 ". Y . . . . . ." 2 ". . . . . Y . ." 3 ". . . . . . . ." 4 ". . . . . . . ." 5 ". . Y . . . . ." 6 ". . . . . . . ." 7 ". . . . . . . ." 8 ". . . . Y . . ." 9 ". . . . . . . ." 10 "R R R R R R R R" 11 ". . . Y . . . ." 12 ". . . . . . . ." So 12 rows, 8 columns. Output also 12 rows 8 columns. Interpretation: Red row is net across full width at row 10 (index 9 zero-based). Yellow balls scattered above and below? In description: net across full width of court. Yellow balls scattered on both sides. Each ball rolls one space closer to the net. A ball arriving at the net tape splits into two trajectories diverging diagonally upward toward opposite corners until they leave the court. Balls that don't reach the net simply stop one space lower. So net is red row. Balls are yellow cells. They move one step towards net (i.e., vertically towards the red row). If a ball is above net, it moves down one row. If below net, moves up one row. If after moving, it lands on net (i.e., the red row), then it splits into two diagonal paths upward (i.e., away from net) toward opposite corners until they leave the grid. Wait "diverging diagonally upward toward opposite corners". Since net is horizontal, upward direction is away from net? For a ball arriving at net, it splits and goes diagonally upward (i.e., away from net) toward opposite corners. So from the net cell, two new yellow cells appear: one moving up-left, one up-right (if net is above? Actually upward from net is away from net, which is opposite direction of original movement). For balls above net moving down, they reach net, then split upward (i.e., back up) diagonally? That seems contradictory. Maybe "upward" means away from net regardless of side: for balls from above, after hitting net they go upward (i.e., continue upward) diagonally to corners (i.e., they bounce off and go up). For balls from below, after hitting net they go upward (i.e., continue upward) which would be towards net? Hmm. Let's examine example to deduce. Input positions of Y: Row1 col2 (1-indexed) (row0 col1) Row2 col6 (row1 col5) Row5 col3 (row4 col2) Row8 col5 (row7 col4) Row11 col4 (row10 col3) Red row at row10 (index9). So balls above net: rows 0-8. Row11 is below net (row10 index10? Actually row11 is index10, below net). Let's see output Y positions. Output rows: Row1 all . (row0) Row2: Y at col2 (row1 col1) matches? Input had Y at row0 col1 moved down one? Actually ball at row0 col1 moves one space closer to net (down) to row1 col1. Output row1 (index1) has Y at col2? Wait output row2 line: ". Y . . . . . ." meaning Y at col2 (index1). That's exactly row1 col1. So ball moved down one. Row3: ". . . . . Y . ." Y at col6 (index5). Input ball at row1 col5 moved down to row2 col5? Output row2 (index2) has Y at col6. Yes. Row4: all . (row3) no Y. Row5: "Y . . . . . . ." Y at col1 (index0). Input b ... [10115 chars truncated]
"Hailstones fall through the sky; when one strikes the thermal inversion layer, it fractures and sends ice shards scattering upward along two diverging wind shear lines"
120b: k=1
See: A red thermal inversion layer lies horizontally across the atmosphere. Yellow hailstones are suspended at various altitudes above and below it.
Do: Each hailstone drops one altitude level. A hailstone arriving just above the inversion layer shatters on contact and launches shards along two diagonal updrafts spreading apart until they exit the atmosphere. Hailstones farther from the layer just descend without breaking.
Grid: Red marks the inversion layer. Yellow marks hailstones and shards. Black is clear sky.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid size? Looks like 12 rows? Let's count: Example input lines: 1 ". Y . . . . . ." 2 ". . . . . Y . ." 3 ". . . . . . . ." 4 ". . . . . . . ." 5 ". . Y . . . . ." 6 ". . . . . . . ." 7 ". . . . . . . ." 8 ". . . . Y . . ." 9 ". . . . . . . ." 10 "R R R R R R R R" 11 ". . . Y . . . ." 12 ". . . . . . . ." So 12 rows, 8 columns. Output also 12 rows, 8 columns. Interpretation: Red row is inversion layer horizontally across entire width at row 10 (0-index?). Yellow hailstones at various positions above and below. Rule: each hailstone drops one altitude level (i.e., moves down one row). If a hailstone arrives just above inversion layer (i.e., one row above red row), it shatters and launches shards along two diagonal updrafts spreading apart until they exit the atmosphere. That means when a Y is directly above a red cell (i.e., at row 9), after moving down one row it would hit red? Actually "arriving just above the inversion layer shatters on contact and launches shards along two diagonal updrafts spreading apart until they exit the atmosphere." So a hailstone that is one row above red (row 9) after moving down one row would be at row 10 (red). It shatters, producing shards that go diagonally upward? Wait "updrafts" maybe upward direction away from layer? The shards spread apart until they exit the atmosphere (i.e., go off grid). So they travel diagonally upward (i.e., away from the red layer) maybe both left-up and right-up from the point of impact? Starting from the cell where it hits? The shards are yellow. Hailstones farther from the layer just descend without breaking (i.e., move down one row). So overall transformation: For each Y in input, compute its new position: move down one row. If the new position is a red cell (i.e., the Y was directly above red), then instead of placing Y there, we generate Y's at diagonal positions moving upward from that point? Actually shards go upward, not downward. Let's examine example to deduce. Let's map coordinates. Use rows 0-11 top to bottom. Red row at row 9 (since 0-index). Input Y positions: Row0 col1 (0,1) Row1 col5 (1,5) Row4 col2 (4,2) Row7 col4 (7,4) Row10 col3 (10,3) (since row10 has Y at col3) Also maybe others? Let's list. Now output Y positions: Row1 col1? Actually output row1 (index1) has Y at col1? Let's see output line2: ". Y . . . . . ." => row1 col1 Y (same as input row0 moved down one). Good. Row2: ". . . . . Y . ." => row2 col5 Y (input row1 col5 moved down one). Good. Row4: "Y . . . . . . ." => row4 col0 Y (input row3? Wait there was no Y at row3. Actually output row4 col0 Y appears new. Let's see input row? There was Y at row4 col2 originally. That moved down to row5 col2 maybe. But output row5 line: ". Y Y . . . . Y" row5 has Y at col1,2,7. Let's examine. Let's compute each input Y: 1) (0,1) -> moves to (1,1) output Y present at (1,1). Yes. 2) (1,5) -> moves to (2,5) output Y at (2,5). Yes. 3) (4,2) -> ... [9982 chars truncated]
"Loose bricks settle one floor downward; any brick that lands on the steel beam cracks and sends fracture lines radiating diagonally upward through the facade to opposite eaves"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A red steel I-beam runs horizontally through the building. Yellow bricks are embedded at various positions in the walls above and below.
Do: Every brick drops one floor. A brick that comes to rest directly on the beam fractures, propagating two diagonal crack lines that climb upward in opposite directions until they reach the roof edge. Bricks that don't land on the beam settle intact.
Grid: Red is the structural beam. Yellow marks bricks and crack lines. Black is intact wall.
"Paratroopers descend one altitude; those who land on the fortified wall trigger flare signals that streak diagonally upward in a V formation to mark the breach for incoming forces"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A red fortification wall stretches across the battlefield. Yellow paratroopers are airborne at various heights above and below the wall.
Do: Each paratrooper descends one level. A trooper who touches down directly above the wall fires two signal flares that rise diagonally apart until they leave the field. Troopers who land elsewhere simply hold position.
Grid: Red is the wall. Yellow marks troopers and flare trails. Black is open ground.
"Spotlight circles drift downstage one mark; any spotlight that reaches the proscenium arch splits into two beams that sweep diagonally upward toward opposite wings"
120b: k=2
See: A red proscenium arch line runs across the stage. Yellow spotlight pools dot the stage floor above and below the arch.
Do: Each spotlight slides one mark downstage. A spotlight arriving at the arch refracts and throws two beams diverging diagonally upward to opposite wings until they exit the stage. Spotlights that don't reach the arch just shift without splitting.
Grid: Red is the proscenium line. Yellow marks spotlights and light beams. Black is dark stage.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with red line (R) across some row (maybe bottom?). In example1 input: grid size? Let's count rows: appears 12 rows? Actually list: Input lines: ". Y . . . . . ." ". . . . . Y . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." ". . . . Y . . ." ". . . . . . . ." "R R R R R R R R" ". . . Y . . . ." ". . . . . . . ." That's 12 rows, 8 columns. Red line is row 10 (0-index 9) all R across 8 columns. Yellow spots elsewhere. Output: also 12 rows, 8 columns. Let's compare transformation. We need to understand rule: "Each spotlight slides one mark downstage. A spotlight arriving at the arch refracts and throws two beams diverging diagonally upward to opposite wings until they exit the stage. Spotlights that don't reach the arch just shift without splitting." Interpretation: The red line is arch (horizontal line). Yellow spots are spotlights. They move down one row (towards the red line). If after moving they land on the red line (i.e., they reach the arch), they split into two diagonal beams upward (i.e., moving up-left and up-right from that point) until they exit grid (i.e., until they go out of bounds). The original spot maybe disappears? In output we see many Y's. Let's test with example1. Input yellow positions (row, col) (0-index rows top). Let's index rows 0-11, cols 0-7. List: (0,1) (1,5) (4,2) (7,4) (10? actually row 10 is red line, not Y) (10? there is Y at row10 col3? Wait row 10 is " . . . Y . . . . " that's row 10 (index 10) after red line? Actually after red line row 10 is ". . . Y . . . .". Yes there is a Y at row 10 col3 (0-index). That's below red line? The red line is row 9. So Y at row10 is below the red line (downstage). Also there is Y at row? row? Let's list all Y's: Row0 col1 Row1 col5 Row4 col2 Row7 col4 Row10 col3 That's 5 Y's. Now output Y positions: Let's list output rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . ." Row1: ". Y . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . Y . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . ." Row4: "Y . . . . . . ." Row5: ". Y Y . . . . Y" Row6: ". . Y . . . Y ." Row7: ". . . Y . Y . ." Row8: ". . . . Y . . ." Row9: "R R R R R R R R" Row10: ". . . . . . . ." Row11: ". . . Y . . . ." Now Y positions: (1,1) (2,5) (4,0) (5,1) (5,2) (5,7) (6,2) (6,6) (7,3) (7,5) (8,4) (11,3) Also maybe (0?) none. Now compare to input. We need to see movement: each Y moves down one row (increase row index by 1) unless it hits red line? Actually "downstage" likely means towards red line (which is maybe at bottom? In example, red line is near bottom (row9). Y's above it move down one row. Let's test: Input Y at (0,1) moves to (1,1) -> output has Y at (1,1). Yes. Input Y at (1,5) moves to (2,5) -> output Y at (2,5). Yes. Input Y at (4,2) moves to (5,2) -> output Y at (5,2). Yes. Input Y at (7,4) moves to (8,4) -> output Y at (8,4). Yes. Input Y at (10,3) is below red line (row9). Moves down one row to (11,3) -> output Y at (11,3). Yes. So ... [9053 chars truncated]
"Seeds sink one layer into the soil; those that reach the buried irrigation pipe sprout twin vines that climb diagonally in opposite directions toward the garden fence"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A red irrigation pipe runs horizontally underground. Yellow seeds are planted at various depths above and below the pipe.
Do: Each seed settles one layer deeper. A seed resting directly above the pipe germinates and sends two vines growing diagonally upward in opposite directions until they pass the garden boundary. Seeds that don't reach the pipe simply sink without sprouting.
Grid: Red is the buried pipe. Yellow marks seeds and vines. Black is soil.
See: The input grid contains a green cross: one full horizontal line of green cells and one full vertical line of green cells that span the entire grid and intersect at a single point. All other cells are black. The green lines divide the grid into four rectangular quadrants.
Do: Keep all green cells unchanged. For every non-green cell at position (row, col), compute its distance to the horizontal green line as dr = |row - row_h| and its distance to the vertical green line as dc = |col - col_v|, where row_h is the row index of the horizontal green line and col_v is the column index of the vertical green line. Then compute max(dr, dc). If this value is even (including zero), color the cell yellow. If this value is odd, leave the cell black. This produces nested concentric rectangular rings (based on Chebyshev distance) radiating outward from the green cross intersection.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input. The green cross remains in place. Every non-green cell is either yellow or black depending on the parity of its Chebyshev distance (max of horizontal and vertical distances) from the cross. The pattern is symmetric across both the horizontal and vertical green lines.
"A stone dropped at a crossroads sends square ripples through still water."
120b: k=1
See: Two green roads cross the world — one running horizon to horizon, the other pole to pole — meeting at a single crossroads. The land around them lies dark and silent, divided into four quiet provinces.
Do: Where the roads meet, drop a stone into the darkness. Square-shaped ripples of golden light pulse outward from the crossroads, each ring one step larger than the last. But the light breathes — every other ripple is visible, and the ones between fade back to darkness. The roads themselves are ancient and unchanging; the ripples wash around them but never disturb them.
Grid: The green crossroads stands untouched. Golden ripple-rings nest outward like the walls of a square labyrinth, alternating with corridors of darkness between them. The pattern mirrors itself perfectly across both roads, as ripples naturally would from a single point of impact. The closer to the crossroads, the tighter the rings; the farther away, the wider each band of light and shadow.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid has green roads: one vertical line of G across entire grid, and one horizontal line of G across entire grid. In example 1, grid size 10x10. Input shows vertical line at column 6 (0-index?) Actually they show 10 columns. The vertical line of G in column 6 (index 5?) Let's index from 0. Input rows: each row has G at position 6 (1-indexed 7?). Wait row strings: ". . . . . . G . . ." That's 10 columns, G at column 7 (1-indexed). So vertical line at column 7. Horizontal line at row 5 (0-indexed 4?) Actually row 5 (0-indexed 4) is "G G G G G G G G G G". So horizontal line across row 5 (index 4). So they intersect at (row5, col7). That's the crossroads. Output shows pattern of Y (yellow) forming square rings around the intersection, but not overlapping the green lines. Let's examine output grid 10x10. Row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y" Row0 columns: col1 Y, col2 ., col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 Y, col7 G, col8 Y, col9 Y, col10 Y. Row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." Row2: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y ." Row3: "Y . Y . Y . G . Y ." Row4: "G G G G G G G G G G" Row5: "Y . Y . Y . G . Y ." Row6: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y ." Row7: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." Row8: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y" Row9: ". . . . . . G . . ." Observations: The pattern of Y forms concentric squares centered at intersection (row4, col6? Actually intersection at row5? Wait row index 4 (0-based) is the horizontal line row. Intersection cell is row4 col6 (0-based). In output, that cell is G (unchanged). The Y pattern forms rings: distance Manhattan? Actually square rings (Chebyshev distance) from center, but only on cells not on the green lines. Also alternating rings: visible (Y) then invisible (.) then Y etc. Let's compute Chebyshev distance d = max(|r - rc|, |c - cc|). For each cell not on green lines, if d is even? Let's test: Intersection at (4,6). For cell (0,0) distance max(4,6)=6. 6 is even? 6 even => maybe Y? Output at (0,0) is Y. Good. Cell (0,1) distance max(4,5)=5 odd => output '.' (yes). Cell (0,2) distance max(4,4)=4 even => Y (yes). So pattern matches even distances Y, odd distances '.' (except green lines). However need to consider that green lines themselves remain G regardless of distance. Also note that cells on green lines but not intersection remain G (vertical line column6 all rows, horizontal line row4 all columns). In output they stay G. Also note that the pattern is symmetric across both axes (roads). So rule: For each cell not G, set to Y if Chebyshev distance from intersection is even, else '.' (black). That matches example. Now test input is larger: 12x12? Let's count columns: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows: 12 rows. Horizontal line is row 9? Actually row index 8 (0-based) is "G G G G G G G G G G G G". So intersection at (row8, col7?) Wait vertical line column is column 7 (1-indexed 7?) Let's count: columns: positions 1-12. G appears at column 7 (since there are six '.' then G). So column index 6 (0-based). Intersection at (ro ... [6516 chars truncated]
"A cell divides at the junction of two membranes, and each generation of daughter cells forms a new wall around the last, alternating between living tissue and empty space."
120b: k=2
See: Two green membranes stretch across the organism, one horizontal and one vertical, meeting at a nucleus.
Do: From the nucleus outward, layers of yellow cytoplasm and black void alternate in rectangular shells, each generation one step farther from the crossing membranes.
Grid: Green membranes remain. Non-membrane cells alternate yellow and black in concentric rectangular bands radiating from where the membranes cross.
We need to understand rule. Input grids have green vertical line (column) and horizontal line (row) crossing at a nucleus (intersection). In examples, the green line is full column of G and full row of G. The rest are '.' (black). Output: green remains unchanged. Non-green cells become alternating Y and . (black) in rectangular shells around the crossing point. Specifically, we have a central crossing point at (row of horizontal line, column of vertical line). In example1, grid size 10x10. Horizontal line at row 4 (0-index?) Actually input shows row 5 (index 4) all G. Vertical line at column 6 (index 5) all G. Intersection at (4,5). Output: we see pattern of Y and . forming concentric rectangles around that point, but also some Y's on the green line? Let's examine output example1: Row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So at row0, column5 is G (vertical line). Others: Y at col0,2,3,4,6,7,8,9? Actually row0: positions: 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 Y,4 Y,5 Y? Wait there is G at col5. Let's list: row0: Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y. So col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y? but G at col5? Wait they said G at col5, but row0 col5 is Y? Let's count columns: there are 10 columns. Input vertical line at column 6 (1-index?) Let's index 0-9. Input row0: ". . . . . . G . . ." So G at column6 (0-index). Output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So G at column6 indeed. So columns: 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 Y,4 Y,5 Y,6 G,7 Y,8 Y,9 Y. So there is Y at column5 (just left of G). So pattern includes Y's on both sides. The rule: Starting from nucleus (intersection), we create layers outward. Each layer is a rectangle border (Manhattan distance max?). Alternating Y and . (black). The green lines remain unchanged (they are not overwritten). So for cells that are green, keep G. For other cells, compute distance from nucleus in terms of Chebyshev distance? Let's test: For cell (0,0) distance max(|row-4|,|col-6|)=max(4,6)=6. Layer index 6. Starting from 0 at nucleus? At nucleus (4,6) is G (green). For distance 1: cells adjacent orthogonal or diagonal? The rectangle border at distance 1 includes positions where max distance =1. Those should be Y? Let's see cell (3,5) (row3 col5) distance max(1,1)=1. Output row3 col5 is '.'? Row3 output: "Y . Y . Y . G . Y .". Let's map: row3 (index3) columns: 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 G,7 .,8 Y,9 . . So col5 is '.' indeed. So distance1 gave '.' not Y. Hmm maybe they start with Y at distance 2? Let's check distance2 cells: e.g., (2,4) distance max(2,2)=2. Output row2 col4 is Y? Row2 output: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y .". col4 is Y (since columns:0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 Y,6 G...). So distance2 gave Y. So pattern: even distance => Y, odd distance => . (black). But need to consider that green cells are excluded (they stay G). Also note that some cells on green line have distance odd/even but remain G. Check distance0 (nucleus) is G (green). So rule: For each non-green cell, compute Chebyshev distance d = max(|r - r0|, |c - c0|). If d is even, color Y; if odd, color . (black). That matc ... [7316 chars truncated]
"Two galactic filaments cross in the void, and at their junction a pulsar emits square wavefronts — luminous shells and dark gaps alternate outward like cosmic Fresnel rings."
120b: k=1
See: A green horizontal filament and a green vertical filament span the cosmos, intersecting at one bright point.
Do: The pulsar at the junction emits energy in rectangular wavefronts. Even-numbered shells glow yellow; odd-numbered shells are dark voids.
Grid: Green filaments persist. All other cells pulse yellow or remain void-black based on their rectangular shell number from the intersection.
We need to understand the transformation rule from example.
We have input grid 10x10? Actually example 1 input appears 10 rows, each 10 columns. Let's map coordinates. Input has a vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?) and a horizontal line of G in row 4 (0-index). So cross shape.
Output: The green line remains unchanged (both vertical and horizontal). Other cells become Y or . (black) based on rectangular shells around intersection point (the crossing). The description: Even-numbered shells glow yellow; odd-numbered shells are dark voids (black). Intersection point is bright? In output, at intersection (row4 col6) is G (still green). The shells are rectangular layers outward from intersection, aligned with axes? Let's examine.
Define intersection at (row4, col6) (0-index). Shell distance maybe max(|dx|,|dy|) i.e., Chebyshev distance (square shells). Even distance => Y, odd => . . Let's test.
Take cell (0,0) top-left corner. dx = -4, dy = -6? Actually row0 col0: row diff = -4, col diff = -6. Chebyshev distance = max(4,6)=6 which is even => Y. Output at (0,0) is Y. Good.
Cell (0,1): row diff -4, col diff -5 => distance 5 odd => .? Output at (0,1) is . (since they show '.'? Actually output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So column1 is '.' matches odd distance.
Cell (0,2): diff -4, -4 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y. Good.
Cell (0,3): diff -4, -3 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y. Good.
Cell (0,4): diff -4, -2 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Cell (0,5): diff -4, -1 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Cell (0,6): intersection column (vertical line) is G unchanged.
Cell (0,7): diff -4, +1 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Cell (0,8): diff -4, +2 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Cell (0,9): diff -4, +3 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Matches.
Now check cell (1,0): row diff -3, col diff -6 => distance 6 even => Y. Output row1 col0 is Y. Good.
Cell (1,1): diff -3,-5 => distance 5 odd => . Output '.'? Row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." Actually row1 col1 is '.' yes.
Cell (1,2): diff -3,-4 => distance 4 even => Y. Output Y.
Cell (1,3): diff -3,-3 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Cell (1,4): diff -3,-2 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Cell (1,5): diff -3,-1 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Cell (1,6): G.
Cell (1,7): diff -3, +1 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Cell (1,8): diff -3,+2 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Cell (1,9): diff -3,+3 => distance 3 odd => . Output '.' matches.
Thus rule: For each cell not part of green lines, compute Chebyshev distance from intersection point (the crossing of the two green lines). If distance is even, set Y; if odd, set . (black). The green lines remain G.
Now test input is larger: 12 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: each row appears 12 entries (". . . . . . G . . . . .") that's 12 columns. There is a vertical line of G at column 6 (0-i
... [5915 chars truncated]
"Two currents meet at right angles, and where they collide, square tidal bores roll outward — cresting waves and calm troughs alternate in nested rectangular sets."
120b: k=1
See: A green east-west current and a green north-south current span the sea, colliding at one point.
Do: From the collision, rectangular wave crests and troughs alternate outward. Crests are yellow foam; troughs are black deep water.
Grid: Green currents remain. Sea cells alternate yellow crest and black trough in concentric rectangular rings from the collision point.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid has green lines forming a cross: a vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?) and a horizontal line of G in row 4 (0-index). In example 1, grid size 10x10. Input: vertical line of G at column 6 (0-index? Actually they show 10 columns). Horizontal line of G at row 4 (0-index). So cross intersection at (row4, col6). Output: they keep the green cross unchanged. Then they fill surrounding cells with alternating Y (yellow) and . (black) in concentric rectangular rings around the intersection point, but only within the "sea" cells? The description: "green east-west current and a green north-south current span the sea, colliding at one point. From the collision, rectangular wave crests and troughs alternate outward. Crests are yellow foam; troughs are black deep water. Grid details: Green currents remain. Sea cells alternate yellow crest and black trough in concentric rectangular rings from the collision point." Thus we need to generate pattern of alternating Y and . in rectangular rings centered at intersection. The rings are axis-aligned rectangles expanding outward. The cells that are part of the cross remain G. The rest of the grid (non-green) become Y or . depending on Manhattan distance? Actually rectangular rings: distance measured as max of row offset and col offset? For a rectangular ring (Chebyshev distance). For each cell not on the green lines, compute its Chebyshev distance d = max(|r - r0|, |c - c0|) where (r0,c0) is intersection. Then if d is odd? Let's test with example. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Intersection at row4, col6. Let's compute for cell (0,0) top-left corner. Offsets: dr=4, dc=6 => d=6. In output at (0,0) they have Y. d=6 even? Actually 6 even. They have Y. So maybe even distance => Y, odd => .? Let's test another cell (0,1) output '.'? Actually output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So col0 Y, col1 '.' (dot). For (0,1): dr=4, dc=5 => d=5 (odd) => '.' matches. Good. Check (0,2): output Y. dr=4, dc=4 => d=4 even => Y. Good. Check (0,5): column5 output Y? Row0 col5 is Y (since row0: Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y). col5 is index5, dr=4, dc=1 => d=4 even => Y matches. col7: row0 col7 Y, dr=4, dc=1? Wait col7 offset = |7-6|=1, dr=4 => d=4 even => Y matches. col8: dr=4, dc=2 => d=4 even => Y matches. col9: dr=4, dc=3 => d=4 even => Y matches. So rule: if cell not G, assign Y if Chebyshev distance from intersection is even, else '.' (black). However note that the cross cells themselves are G, regardless of distance. Check row1 col0 output Y. dr=3, dc=6 => d=6 even => Y matches. Row1 col1 '.'? dr=3, dc=5 => d=5 odd => '.' matches. Row1 col2 Y? dr=3, dc=4 => d=4 even => Y matches. Row1 col3 '.'? dr=3, dc=3 => d=3 odd => '.' but output row1 col3 is '.'? Actually row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." So col3 '.' yes matches. Row1 col4 '.'? dr=3, dc=2 => d=3 odd => '.' matches. Row1 col5 '.'? dr=3, dc=1 => d=3 odd => '.' mat ... [8160 chars truncated]
"Two bus lines cross on a circuit board, and the signal at their junction propagates outward in square clock cycles — high and low voltage alternate in rectangular wavefronts."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A green horizontal trace and a green vertical trace span the entire board, meeting at one junction.
Do: A square clock signal radiates from the junction. Even cycles drive cells high (yellow); odd cycles pull them low (black).
Grid: Green traces unchanged. Every cell is high-yellow or low-black depending on its rectangular wavefront distance from the junction.
"Yggdrasil's roots and branches form a great cross through the nine realms, and from their nexus, rings of golden light and primordial darkness alternate outward — the world tree breathing order into chaos."
120b: k=1
See: A green horizontal root and a green vertical branch span all of existence, crossing at one sacred point.
Do: Golden realms and dark voids alternate in rectangular rings outward from the nexus, each ring one step farther from the tree's heart.
Grid: Green world-tree remains. Cells glow golden-yellow or stay void-black in alternating rectangular shells from the crossing.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: a cross of green line: vertical line column? In example 1, grid size 10x10. Input shows column 6 (0-index?) Actually they show 10 columns. The vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index 5?) Let's index: positions: columns 0-9. Input rows: each row has G at column 6? Let's count: ". . . . . . G . . ." that's 10 columns: indices 0-5 '.' then index6 G then '.' '.' '.'? Wait there are 10 entries: positions 0-5 '.' (6), position6 G, positions7-9 '.' (3). So column 6 (0-index) is G. Also there is a full row of G at row 4 (0-index) across all columns. So cross at (row4, col6). Output shows pattern of Y and . around, with G unchanged. The description: "Golden realms and dark voids alternate in rectangular rings outward from the nexus". So we need to fill alternating rings (Manhattan distance? rectangular shells) around the crossing point (the intersection). The crossing point is the whole row and column of G remain G. The rest cells become Y or . in alternating rectangular rings outward from the crossing. Let's examine output to deduce pattern. For example 1 output grid 10x10. Let's compute distances from the cross? The cross includes all cells where row==4 or col==6. Those remain G (as in output). Indeed output shows G in those positions unchanged. Now for other cells, they are either Y or . (black). The pattern appears to be concentric rectangular rings centered at the crossing point (the intersection). Since the cross extends infinitely, the "distance" maybe defined as max of Manhattan distances to the nearest G cell? Actually rectangular shells outward from the tree's heart (the crossing). Since the cross is like axes, the distance to the cross is min(|row-4|, |col-6|)? Wait rectangular shells: For each cell not on cross, consider its "Chebyshev distance" to the cross? Let's test. Take cell (0,0) top-left corner. Row 0, col0. Distance to row4 is |0-4|=4, to col6 is |0-6|=6. The nearest axis distance is min(4,6)=4. So ring index maybe 4? Output at (0,0) is Y. Let's see pattern: (0,0) Y. (0,1) .? Actually output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So col0 Y, col1 . , col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 G, col7 Y, col8 Y, col9 Y. So pattern not simple. Let's compute for each cell its "Manhattan distance to nearest G cell"? For cell (0,1): row0 col1. Distance to row4 axis: |0-4|=4. Distance to col6 axis: |1-6|=5. Minimum =4. So same as (0,0) but output is '.' not Y. So not based solely on distance. Maybe pattern is based on parity of sum of distances? Let's compute (row distance + col distance) maybe? For (0,0): distance to cross? Could be Manhattan distance to intersection (4,6): |0-4|+|0-6|=10. For (0,1): 9. So parity flips? 10 even => Y, 9 odd => . Indeed Y for even, . for odd? Let's test other cells. Check (0,2): output Y. Distance to (4,6) = |0-4|+|2-6|=4+4=8 even => Y. (0,3): Y distance 7? Actually |0-4|+|3-6|=4+3=7 odd would be . but output Y. So not. Maybe distance measured as Chebyshev distance (max of r ... [8165 chars truncated]
"Two lines of dancers cross the ballroom floor, and from where the lead pair meets, a square formation expands — partners step forward into the light on even beats and retreat into shadow on odd beats."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A green horizontal line and a green vertical line of dancers span the floor, meeting at center.
Do: Concentric rectangular formations expand from center. Dancers on even-numbered rings step into yellow light; those on odd rings fade to black shadow.
Grid: Green dancer lines stay. Floor cells are lit yellow or shadowed black in alternating rectangular rings from the center meeting point.
"Two fault lines cross deep underground, and the quake at their junction sends square shockwaves through the strata — compression and rarefaction alternate in nested rectangular rings through the bedrock."
120b: k=1
See: A green horizontal fault and a green vertical fault span the crust, meeting at an epicenter.
Do: Seismic waves radiate in rectangular shells from the epicenter. Compressed layers turn yellow; rarefied layers remain black.
Grid: Green faults persist. Rock cells alternate yellow compression and black rarefaction in concentric rectangular rings from the fault crossing.
We need to understand transformation. Input grid has green vertical line (column) and green horizontal line (row) crossing at epicenter. In example 1, grid size 10x10. Input: vertical line of G at column 6 (0-index? Actually they show 10 columns). Horizontal line at row 5 (0-index). So crossing at (5,6). Output: they fill concentric rectangular rings around crossing, alternating Y and . (black). The green line remains unchanged (fault persists). Let's examine output pattern. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input G vertical at col 5? Wait they show ". . . . . . G . . ." that's 10 columns, G at position 6 (0-index 5?). Count: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 G,7 .,8 .,9 . So column 6 (0-index). Horizontal line row 4? Actually they have row 4 (0-index) as "G G G G G G G G G G". That's row index 4 (5th row). So crossing at (row4, col6). Output: Let's see row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". That's 10 columns. At col6 still G. Others Y or . pattern. We need to see rule: For each cell not on green lines, compute Manhattan distance? Actually rectangular shells: distance measured as max of vertical and horizontal offset from epicenter? Concentric rectangular rings (like Chebyshev distance). For each cell, compute Chebyshev distance d = max(|r - epicenter_row|, |c - epicenter_col|). Then assign Y if d is odd? Let's test: Epicenter at (4,6). For cell (0,0): dr=4, dc=6 => max=6. d=6 even. Output at (0,0) is Y (should be maybe even?). Let's compute parity: d=6 even -> Y. At (0,1): dr=4, dc=5 => max=5 odd -> output '.' (black). Indeed row0 col1 is '.' . Good. At (0,2): dr=4, dc=4 => max=4 even -> Y. Row0 col2 Y. At (0,3): dr=4, dc=3 => max=4 even -> Y (output Y). Row0 col3 Y. At (0,4): dr=4, dc=2 => max=4 even -> Y (output Y). Row0 col5: dr=4, dc=1 => max=4 even -> Y (output Y). Row0 col6 is G (fault). Row0 col7: dr=4, dc=1 => max=4 even -> Y (output Y). Row0 col8: dr=4, dc=2 => max=4 even -> Y. Row0 col9: dr=4, dc=3 => max=4 even -> Y. So pattern matches: Y for even Chebyshev distance, . for odd. Check another cell: row1 col0: dr=3, dc=6 => max=6 even -> Y (output Y). row1 col1: dr=3, dc=5 => max=5 odd -> '.' (output .). row1 col2: dr=3, dc=4 => max=4 even -> Y (output Y). row1 col3: dr=3, dc=3 => max=3 odd -> '.'? Output row1 col3 is '.'? Actually row1 line: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." So col3 is '.' yes. Good. So rule holds. Thus transformation: Keep green lines unchanged. For other cells, compute Chebyshev distance from epicenter (intersection of green lines). If distance even -> Y (yellow), else black '.'. Now test input: size? Let's count columns: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows: there are 12 rows (since they show 12 lines). Horizontal line appears at row 8 (0-index) because line "G G G G G G G G G G G G". That's row index 8 (9th row). Vertical line at column 6 (0-index) same as before (since G at position 6). So epicenter at (row8, col6). Need to produce outpu ... [6555 chars truncated]
"A hot cross bun fresh from the oven radiates heat in square waves — the icing cross stays cool while the dough pulses warm-cold-warm in nested boxes."
120b: k=1
See: A green icing cross divides the bun's surface into four quadrants of dark dough.
Do: Heat radiates from where the cross meets, baking the dough in alternating rings of golden crust and raw darkness, each ring one layer farther out.
Grid: The green cross persists. Dough cells become golden or stay dark in alternating rectangular halos measured from the cross center.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: a cross of green G vertical line in column? In example 1 input 10x10? Actually 10 rows, 10 columns. There's a vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?). Also a horizontal line of G across row 5 (0-index). So a plus sign (cross) of green dividing grid into quadrants. Output shows many Y (yellow) and some . (black) etc. The cross remains green unchanged. The rest cells become Y or . in pattern of alternating rectangular halos measured from cross center. Let's analyze. Coordinates: Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. The cross: column 6 (index 5? Wait count). Input shows each row: ". . . . . . G . . ." That's 10 entries: positions 0-5 are ., position 6 is G? Actually there are 6 dots then G then 3 dots = total 10. So G at column 6 (0-index 6). Row 4 (0-index) is "G G G G G G G G G G" all G across row 4. So cross center at (row4, col6). So vertical line at col6, horizontal at row4. Now output: Row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". Let's map columns. At col6 still G. Others Y or . pattern. Row0 col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 G, col7 Y, col8 Y, col9 Y. Row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." => col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y, col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 G, col7 ., col8 ., col9 . Row2: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y ." => etc. Seems pattern based on Manhattan distance from center? Alternating rings rectangular (i.e., Chebyshev distance?) Let's compute distances. Define dx = |col - 6|, dy = |row - 4|. The "ring" maybe max(dx, dy) (Chebyshev) gives square rings. Alternating between Y and .? Let's test. For cell (0,0): dx=6, dy=4 => max=6. Row0 col0 output Y. For (0,1): dx=5, dy=4 => max=5 => output . . Indeed row0 col1 is . So maybe odd distance => . , even => Y? Let's test (0,2): dx=4, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. (0,3): dx=3, dy=4 => max=4? Actually max=4 (since dy=4) even => Y matches. (0,4): dx=2, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. (0,5): dx=1, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. (0,7): dx=1, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. (0,8): dx=2, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. (0,9): dx=3, dy=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. So pattern holds: cells where max(dx,dy) even => Y, odd => . (except cross cells remain G). Let's test row1 col0: row1 dy=3, col0 dx=6 => max=6 even => Y matches. Row1 col1: dy=3, dx=5 => max=5 odd => . matches. Row1 col2: dy=3, dx=4 => max=4 even => Y matches. Row1 col3: dy=3, dx=3 => max=3 odd => . matches (output .). Row1 col4: dy=3, dx=2 => max=3 odd => . matches. Row1 col5: dy=3, dx=1 => max=3 odd => . matches. Row1 col7: dy=3, dx=1 => max=3 odd => . matches. Good. Thus rule: Keep green cross unchanged. For other cells, compute Chebyshev distance from center (intersection of cross). If distance is even, color Y (yellow). If odd, color . (black). That matches example. Now test input: larger grid 12x12? Let's count rows: given 12 rows? Actually list shows 12 rows: first 8 rows with vertical line, then row8 a ... [6819 chars truncated]
"Two resonating strings cross on a soundboard, and standing waves form square nodes and antinodes spreading outward from where they meet."
120b: k=1
See: A green horizontal string and a green vertical string vibrate across the full instrument, crossing at one point.
Do: Where the strings cross, interference patterns bloom outward — alternating bands of resonance and silence in rectangular shells.
Grid: Green strings stay. Every other position rings yellow or falls silent black, determined by how many shells out from the crossing it sits.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: a cross of green line: full vertical line column? In example 1, grid 10x10. Input shows column 6 (0-index?) Actually they show 10 columns. The vertical line of G at column 6 (0-index 5?) Let's index: rows 0-9. In each row, there is a G at column 6 (7th position). Also row 4 is all G (horizontal line). So cross at (row4, col6). Output: they keep green strings unchanged (vertical and horizontal remain G). Then they fill other cells with Y or . (black) in alternating rectangular shells around crossing. Let's examine output pattern. For positions not on the cross, they are either Y or . . The pattern seems like Manhattan distance from crossing? Let's compute. Crossing at (4,6). For each cell (r,c) not on cross, compute max of |r-4|, |c-6|? Or maybe Chebyshev distance (square shells). Let's test: At (0,0) distance max= max(4,6)=6. Output at (0,0) is Y. At (0,1) is .? Actually output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So column0 Y, col1 . , col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 G, col7 Y, col8 Y, col9 Y. So pattern not simple. Let's compute Chebyshev distance d = max(|r-4|, |c-6|). For row0, col0: |r-4|=4, |c-6|=6 => d=6. Row0 col1: d = max(4,5)=5. Row0 col2: d = max(4,4)=4. Row0 col3: d = max(4,3)=4? Actually max(4,3)=4. Row0 col4: max(4,2)=4. Row0 col5: max(4,1)=4. Row0 col6 is cross (G). Row0 col7: max(4,1)=4. col8: max(4,2)=4. col9: max(4,3)=4. Now output Y for d=6, . for d=5, Y for d=4. So pattern maybe Y for even distance, . for odd distance? Let's test: d=6 even => Y, d=5 odd => ., d=4 even => Y. Works for row0. Check row1: output row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . .". Row1 r=1. Compute distances: col0: |r-4|=3, |c-6|=6 => d=6 (even) => Y matches. col1: d=max(3,5)=5 odd => . matches. col2: d=max(3,4)=4 even => Y matches. col3: d=max(3,3)=3 odd => . matches (output .). col4: d=max(3,2)=3 odd => . matches. col5: d=max(3,1)=3 odd => . matches. col6 G. col7: d=max(3,1)=3 odd => . matches. col8: d=max(3,2)=3 odd => . matches. col9: d=max(3,3)=3 odd => . matches. Good. Row2: output "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y .". Row2 r=2, |r-4|=2. Compute d per column: col0: max(2,6)=6 even => Y. col1: max(2,5)=5 odd => . . matches. col2: max(2,4)=4 even => Y matches. col3: max(2,3)=3 odd => . matches. col4: max(2,2)=2 even => Y matches. col5: max(2,1)=2 even => Y matches. col6 G. col7: max(2,1)=2 even => Y matches. col8: max(2,2)=2 even => Y matches. col9: max(2,3)=3 odd => . matches. Good. Thus rule: For each cell not on green cross, compute Chebyshev distance (max of row diff and col diff) from the crossing point (intersection of the two green lines). If distance is even, set Y (yellow). If odd, set . (black). Keep green lines unchanged. Now test input: grid size? Provided test input appears 12 columns? Let's count: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." that's 12 columns. Rows: 12? Actually they list 12 rows (0-11). Row0-7 have vertical G at column 6 (0-index?). Row8 is full horizontal G row ... [5487 chars truncated]
"The referee stands at center court where the lines cross, and the crowd does the wave — but the wave travels in square fronts, every other ring standing while the rest sit."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green court lines run the full length and width, crossing at center court. The stands are dark.
Do: The wave pulses outward from center in rectangular fronts. Odd-numbered rings stay seated in darkness; even-numbered rings leap up in yellow.
Grid: Court lines remain green. Spectator cells are yellow if their ring number from center is even, black if odd.
"Lightning strikes a crossroads and pressure waves radiate outward in square isobars — high and low pressure alternate in nested rectangular fronts."
120b: k=1
See: Two green storm fronts collide, one running east-west and one north-south, meeting at a single flash point.
Do: From the strike point, atmospheric pressure oscillates outward, high then low then high, forming rectangular isobars that mirror each other across both fronts.
Grid: Green fronts unchanged. Each cell becomes high-pressure yellow or low-pressure black based on which rectangular isobar ring it falls within.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: 10x10 in example 1? Actually example 1 input appears 10x10. There's a vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?) and a horizontal line of G in row 4 (full row). So cross shape: vertical line at column 6 (0-index maybe 5) and horizontal line at row 4 (0-index maybe 4). Output shows G unchanged. Other cells become Y or . (black) based on rectangular rings centered at intersection point (the crossing). Intersection at (row4, col6). The pattern: seems like concentric rectangles (Manhattan distance?) with alternating Y and . (black). Let's examine output coordinates. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input G at col5? Wait count: Input line: ". . . . . . G . . ." that's 10 entries: positions 0-5 '.' then position6 'G' then 7-9 '.' . So G at col6 (0-index). Horizontal line row4 all G. Thus intersection at (4,6). Output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". Let's map: row0 col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 G, col7 Y, col8 Y, col9 Y. We need to compute Manhattan distance from intersection? Let's compute distance d = max(|r-4|, |c-6|) maybe Chebyshev distance (square rings). For row0 col0: |r-4|=4, |c-6|=6, max=6. Row0 col0 output Y. Row0 col1 distance max(4,5)=5 output '.' . Row0 col2 max(4,4)=4 output Y. Row0 col3 max(4,3)=4? Actually max=4 output Y. Row0 col4 max(4,2)=4 Y. Row0 col5 max(4,1)=4 Y. Row0 col6 is G unchanged. Row0 col7 max(4,1)=4 Y. Row0 col8 max(4,2)=4 Y. Row0 col9 max(4,3)=4 Y. Pattern: For distance 6 -> Y, distance5 -> ., distance4 -> Y. So alternating starting with Y at outermost? Let's check other rows. Row1 output: "Y . Y . . . G . . .". Row1 col0 Y distance max(3,6)=6 Y matches. col1 . distance5 '.' matches. col2 Y distance4 Y matches. col3 . distance3? max(3,3)=3 output '.' . col4 . distance2? max(3,2)=3? Wait col4 index4: |c-6|=2, max=3 output '.' . col5 . distance max(3,1)=3 '.' . col6 G unchanged. col7 . distance max(3,1)=3 '.' . col8 . distance max(3,2)=3 '.' . col9 . distance max(3,3)=3 '.'. So distance 3 gives '.' . So pattern: distance 6 Y,5 .,4 Y,3 .,2 ?,1 ?,0? Let's see row2 output: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y .". Row2 (r=2) distances: col0 max(2,6)=6 Y ok. col1 max(2,5)=5 . ok. col2 max(2,4)=4 Y ok. col3 max(2,3)=3 . ok. col4 max(2,2)=2 Y (output Y) good. col5 max(2,1)=2 Y (output Y) good. col6 G. col7 max(2,1)=2 Y output Y. col8 max(2,2)=2 Y output Y. col9 max(2,3)=3 . output '.' matches. Row3 output: "Y . Y . Y . G . Y .". Row3 r=3 distances: col0 max(1,6)=6 Y. col1 max(1,5)=5 . . col2 max(1,4)=4 Y. col3 max(1,3)=3 . . col4 max(1,2)=2 Y. col5 max(1,1)=1 . output '.' (yes). col6 G. col7 max(1,1)=1 . output '.' . col8 max(1,2)=2 Y output Y. col9 max(1,3)=3 . output '.'. Row4 is all G unchanged. Row5 r=5 distances: row5 output "Y . Y . Y . G . Y .". r=5 diff =1. same as row3 symmetrical. Row6 r=6 diff=2: output "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y .". matches row2. Row7 r=7 diff=3: output "Y . Y . . . G . . .". matches row1. Row8 r=8 diff=4: output "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". matches row0. Ro ... [5906 chars truncated]
"An architect lays two load-bearing walls across a foundation, then builds concentric courtyards around their intersection — every other courtyard is paved gold, the rest left open to the sky."
120b: k=1
See: Two green walls span the full building, one horizontal and one vertical, intersecting once.
Do: Nested rectangular courtyards are constructed outward from the intersection. Even-numbered courtyards are paved yellow; odd-numbered ones remain open and black.
Grid: Green walls persist. All other cells are paved yellow or open black in alternating rectangular rings from the walls' crossing.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid has green walls: a full row and a full column intersecting at a point. In example 1, grid size 10x10. Input shows a vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?) Actually they show 10 columns. The vertical line at column 6 (0-index 5?) Let's index: columns 0-9. The G column appears at column 6? Let's count: ". . . . . . G . . ." That's 10 entries: positions 0-5 are ., position6 is G, positions7-9 are . So column index 6. Also there is a full row of G at row 4 (0-index). So intersection at (row4, col6). That's the crossing. Output: they fill rectangular rings outward from intersection, alternating Y (yellow) and . (black). The green walls remain unchanged. Let's examine output pattern. We need to generate rings: Starting from intersection, we consider rectangles that expand outward, with walls as boundaries? The description: "Two green walls span the full building, one horizontal and one vertical, intersecting once. Nested rectangular courtyards are constructed outward from the intersection. Even-numbered courtyards are paved yellow; odd-numbered ones remain open and black." Thus we have concentric rectangles centered at intersection, aligned with grid axes, using the walls as axes. The walls themselves remain green. The cells not on walls are colored based on which ring they belong to: ring 1 (closest to intersection) is black (.), ring2 yellow, ring3 black, etc. Let's test with example. Intersection at (4,6). Let's compute Manhattan distance? Actually rectangular rings: For each cell not on walls, consider max(|row - intersectRow|, |col - intersectCol|). That gives Chebyshev distance (square rings). The parity of distance determines color: distance 0 is the intersection cell itself (which is G because it's on both walls). For cells on same row or column as intersection (i.e., on walls) remain G. For other cells, distance d >=1. If d is odd => black, even => yellow? Let's test. Take cell (0,0) top-left corner. intersect (4,6). diff rows =4, cols=6 => max=6 => distance 6 (even) => should be yellow. Output at (0,0) is Y. Yes. Cell (0,1): row diff 4, col diff5 => max5 odd => black? Output at (0,1) is '.'? Actually output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". At column1 (index1) is '.' (black). Good. Cell (0,2): diff rows4, cols4 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Good. Cell (0,3): diff rows4, cols3 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Good. Cell (0,4): diff rows4, cols2 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Good. Cell (0,5): diff rows4, cols1 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Good. Cell (0,6) is G (wall). Output G. Cell (0,7): diff rows4, cols1 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Indeed Y. Cell (0,8): diff rows4, cols2 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Cell (0,9): diff rows4, cols3 => max4 even => Y. Output Y. Matches. Check a cell where distance odd: e.g., (1,1): row diff3, col diff5 => max5 odd => should be '.' Output row1: "Y . Y . . . G . . ." At col1 '.' yes. (1,2) ... [8235 chars truncated]
"A fortress is built at the crossroads of two great walls, and concentric rectangular ramparts radiate outward — garrison and moat alternate in nested rings of defense."
120b: k=1
See: Two green fortification lines span the battlefield, crossing at a strategic point.
Do: Defensive rings expand outward from the stronghold. Every other ring is manned with yellow garrisons; the rest are flooded black moats.
Grid: The green walls hold. Each cell is garrison yellow or moat black depending on which concentric rectangular ring it occupies from the crossing.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: black '.' background, green G forming two lines: vertical line of G in column 6 (0-index?) and horizontal line of G across row 8 (0-index). So crossing at (row8, col6). Output: we see Y and . and G. The description: defensive rings expand outward from the stronghold (crossing). Every other ring is manned with yellow garrisons; the rest are flooded black moats. So we need to fill concentric rectangular rings around the crossing point, alternating Y and . (black). The green walls hold (remain G). So output: cells that are part of rings get Y or . depending on ring parity. The rings are rectangular shapes expanding outward from crossing, bounded by the extents of the grid? Let's examine example. Grid size 10x10. Crossing at (row4? Actually row index 4 (0-based) is the horizontal line row 4 (since row 0-3 have vertical line only, row4 is full G). Column index 5? Let's count: Input row0: ". . . . . . G . . ." That's 10 columns, G at position 6 (0-based index 6). So vertical line at col6. Horizontal line at row4 (0-index). So crossing at (4,6). Output: Let's map. I'll create coordinates. We'll compute Manhattan distance? Actually rectangular rings: distance measured as max(|dx|,|dy|) from crossing? That yields Chebyshev distance (square rings). Alternating Y and . starting with Y for distance 1? Let's test. At crossing (4,6) is G (remains G). For cells where either row==4 or col==6 (the lines) remain G? Actually output shows G across entire row4 and column6 unchanged. Yes. Now other cells: For each cell not on green lines, we assign Y if its Chebyshev distance from crossing is odd? Let's test a few. Take cell (0,0). dx = -4, dy = -6 => max(|dx|,|dy|)=6. 6 is even. Output at (0,0) is Y according to output? Row0 col0 is Y. That's odd? Actually Y appears. So maybe Y for even distance? Let's test (0,1): dx=-4, dy=-5 => max=5 odd. Output row0 col1 is '.' (black). Indeed row0 col1 is '.' in output? Row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So col1 is '.' yes. So pattern matches: Y for even distance, . for odd distance. Let's test (0,2): dx=-4, dy=-4 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. Good. (0,3): dx=-4, dy=-3 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. (0,4): dx=-4, dy=-2 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. (0,5): dx=-4, dy=-1 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. (0,6) is G line. (0,7): dx=-4, dy=1 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. (0,8): dx=-4, dy=2 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. (0,9): dx=-4, dy=3 => max=4 even => Y. Output Y. So row0 matches. Row1: output "Y . Y . . . G . . .". Let's compute distances. Row1 col0: dx=-3, dy=-6 => max=6 even => Y correct. col1: dx=-3, dy=-5 => max=5 odd => . correct. col2: dx=-3, dy=-4 => max=4 even => Y correct. col3: dx=-3, dy=-3 => max=3 odd => . output '.' yes. col4: dx=-3, dy=-2 => max=3 odd => . output '.' yes. col5: dx=-3, dy=-1 => max=3 odd => . output '.' yes. col6 G. col7: dx=-3, dy=1 => max=3 odd => . output '.' yes. col8: dx=-3, dy= ... [6678 chars truncated]
"Two spotlights cross on an empty stage, and their interference casts square halos of light and shadow — performers standing in bright rings are illuminated, those in dark rings vanish."
120b: k=1
See: A green horizontal beam and a green vertical beam sweep across the full stage, crossing at one point.
Do: From the crossing, alternating rings of spotlight and shadow expand outward in rectangular frames. Lit cells glow yellow; shadowed cells stay black.
Grid: Green beams remain. Cells alternate yellow and black in concentric rectangular rings based on their distance from where the beams cross.
We need to understand rule. Input has green vertical line column (maybe column 6?) and horizontal line row (row 4? Actually example 1: grid 10x10. Input shows column of G at column 6 (0-index?) and row of G at row 4 (0-index). So crossing at (row4, col6). Output: green beams remain unchanged. Then alternating rings of yellow and black (.) outward in rectangular frames centered at crossing. Let's examine output pattern. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Crossing at (4,6). Output: row4 all G unchanged. Column6 all G unchanged. Now for other cells: they become Y or . based on Manhattan distance? Actually rectangular rings: distance measured as max of vertical and horizontal offset? For rectangular frames (Chebyshev distance). Let's compute for cell (0,0): offset dr = 4, dc =6. max =6. Is that even? Let's see output at (0,0) is Y. So ring 0? Let's compute ring index = max(|r-4|,|c-6|). For (0,0) =6. For (0,1) = max(4,5)=5 => output at (0,1) is . (since row0 col1 is .). Indeed output row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So col1 is . matches. So pattern: if ring index is even -> Y, odd -> .? Let's test: ring index 6 even => Y yes. ring index5 odd => . yes. ring index4 even => Y? At (0,2) offset max(4,4)=4 even => Y matches. (0,3) offset max(4,3)=4 even => Y matches. (0,4) offset max(4,2)=4 even => Y matches. (0,5) offset max(4,1)=4 even => Y matches. (0,6) is G (beam). (0,7) offset max(4,1)=4 even => Y matches. (0,8) offset max(4,2)=4 even => Y matches. (0,9) offset max(4,3)=4 even => Y matches. Good. Check row1 col0: output Y. Offsets dr=3, dc=6 => max=6 even => Y. Row1 col1: . offset max(3,5)=5 odd => . matches. Row1 col2: Y offset max(3,4)=4 even => Y matches. Row1 col3: . offset max(3,3)=3 odd => . matches? Output row1 col3 is . yes. Row1 col4: . offset max(3,2)=3 odd => . output . yes. Row1 col5: . offset max(3,1)=3 odd => . output . yes. Row1 col6 G. Row1 col7 . offset max(3,1)=3 odd => . output . yes. Row1 col8 . offset max(3,2)=3 odd => . output . yes. Row1 col9 . offset max(3,3)=3 odd => . output . yes. Thus rule: For each cell not part of green beams, compute Chebyshev distance d = max(|r - r0|, |c - c0|) where (r0,c0) is crossing point (intersection of full row and column of G). If d is even, set Y; if odd, set . (black). Keep G cells unchanged. Now test input: size? Let's count rows: appears 12 rows, each with 12 columns? Input lines show 12 columns: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." that's 12 entries. So grid 12x12. Horizontal green line is row 8 (0-index) because line of G across row 8 (the 9th line). Vertical green line column 6 (0-index) because each line has G at position 6. So crossing at (8,6). Need to produce output 12x12. We will compute for each cell (r,c). If r==8 or c==6 => G. Else compute d = max(|r-8|, |c-6|). If d even => Y else . . Let's generate. Create rows 0-11, cols 0-11. I'll make table. First, note crossing point (8,6) is G. Row0 (r=0): Compute |r-8| = ... [5985 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants hedgerows in a cross pattern and then lays out nested rectangular garden beds around the intersection — alternating between marigold borders and bare earth paths."
120b: k=2
See: Two green hedgerows run the full length and width of the garden, meeting at a central point.
Do: Rectangular planting beds radiate from the center. Every other bed bursts with yellow marigolds; the intervening paths are left as bare black soil.
Grid: Green hedges stay. Cells are yellow marigolds or black earth in alternating rectangular rings outward from the hedge crossing.
We need to infer rule. Input grids have green hedges forming two full-length lines crossing: one vertical line of G across entire grid (full column) and one horizontal line of G across entire grid (full row). In examples, they intersect at center (forming a plus). The rest are '.' (black). Output: keep G unchanged. Then fill cells in alternating rectangular rings outward from the crossing with Y (yellow) and '.' (black) alternating. Essentially create concentric rectangles centered at intersection, aligned with axes, with thickness 1 cell? Let's examine Example1: Input size 10x10? Actually 10 rows, 10 columns. G column at column 6 (0-index?) and G row at row5 (0-index). Output shows Y pattern forming rings. Let's map coordinates. Row0: "Y . Y Y Y Y G Y Y Y". So around G column (col6) there is Y except some '.' at col1? Actually row0 col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y, col3 Y, col4 Y, col5 Y, col6 G, col7 Y, col8 Y, col9 Y. So pattern: a ring of Y around center? Let's compute distance from center (row5,col6). Manhattan? Or Chebyshev? Let's compute Chebyshev distance (max of |dx|,|dy|). For row0, dy = -5, so distance 5. For col0, dx = -6, distance max 6. But Y appears at many positions not uniform. Maybe rule: fill all cells that are not on same row or column as G with Y if they are in positions where both row and column indices are either both even or both odd relative to center? Let's test: row0 col0 Y (both even distance from center? row diff -5 (odd), col diff -6 (even) not same parity. Hmm. Look at pattern: It seems like alternating rectangular rings: The region between the central cross and the outer border is divided into concentric rectangles (like layers). The innermost layer (adjacent to cross) maybe is '.' (black) except some Y? Let's examine Example1 near center: Row4 is the G row (index4? Actually row4 is all G). Row5 is below center? Wait center row is row4 (0-index) because G row is row4 (the 5th row). Row5 is just below. Row5 output: "Y . Y . Y . G . Y .". So row5 has Y at col0, col2, col4, col6? Actually col6 is G. Y at col8. So pattern: Y at even columns except column1? Let's list columns 0-9: 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 G,7 .,8 Y,9 . . So Y at even columns (0,2,4,8) but not at 6 because G. So seems like alternating columns. Row6 output: "Y . Y . Y Y G Y Y .". That's row6 (index6). Y at 0,2,4,5,7,8. So pattern changes. Maybe rule: For each cell, consider its Chebyshev distance d from the central cross intersection (the cell where both a G row and G column intersect). If d is even, fill Y; if odd, keep '.'? Let's test: Intersection at (row4,col6). Compute d = max(|r-4|,|c-6|). For row0 col0: |r-4|=4, |c-6|=6 => d=6 (even) => Y (yes). Row0 col1: |r-4|=4, |c-6|=5 => d=5 (odd) => '.' (yes). Row0 col2: |c-6|=4 => d=4 even => Y (yes). Row0 col3: d=5 odd => Y? Wait row0 col3: |c-6|=3, |r-4|=4 => d=4 (max 4) even => Y (output Y). Good. Row0 col4: |c-6|=2, d=4 even => Y (output Y). Row0 col5: |c-6|=1, d=4 even => Y ( ... [8167 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 6×9 grid with a black background containing two 3×3 regions, both occupying columns 3–5. The top region (rows 0–2) contains an azure pattern — an irregular shape made of azure cells within that 3×3 block. The bottom region (rows 3–5) contains a yellow pattern that resembles a plus sign (center cell plus four cardinal neighbors) with one additional cell in either the top-left or top-right corner of the 3×3 block. This extra yellow cell breaks the plus sign's symmetry and serves as a directional indicator: if it is in the top-right corner, the direction is RIGHT; if it is in the top-left corner, the direction is LEFT.
Do: 1. Identify the yellow 3×3 region (rows 3–5, columns 3–5). Determine whether the extra yellow cell (beyond the basic plus shape) is at the top-right or top-left corner of this block. Top-right means direction RIGHT; top-left means direction LEFT. 2. Extract the azure 3×3 pattern from rows 0–2, columns 3–5. 3. Create a horizontally mirrored copy of that 3×3 azure pattern (flip left to right, so column 0 of the block swaps with column 2). 4. Place the mirrored copy adjacent to the original azure block in the indicated direction: if RIGHT, place it at columns 6–8 (immediately to the right); if LEFT, place it at columns 0–2 (immediately to the left). 5. Leave the yellow region and all other cells unchanged.
Grid: The grid is always 6 rows by 9 columns with a black (.) background. The top three rows contain the azure pattern centered in columns 3–5, with columns 0–2 or 6–8 initially empty (black) to receive the mirrored copy. The bottom three rows contain the yellow directional indicator in columns 3–5. The grid dimensions do not change between input and output.
"A yellow weather vane tells the azure cloud which way to cast its reflection."
120b: k=2
See: A small azure cloud drifts in the upper half of a dark sky, while below it sits a yellow weather vane — a plus-shaped post with one extra fin jutting to the left or right, revealing which way the wind is blowing.
Do: The wind catches the azure cloud and blows a mirror-image of it outward in the direction the weather vane points. The reflection lands right next to the original cloud, as if the sky now holds the cloud and its twin reflected in a puddle laid sideways. The weather vane itself is anchored and never moves — only the cloud above is subject to the wind.
Grid: The sky is a dark canvas nine columns wide and six rows tall. The cloud always forms in the middle three columns of the upper atmosphere, while the weather vane is bolted into the same middle columns of the lower half. One side of the sky is empty, waiting to receive the cloud's wind-blown reflection.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 9x6 grid. Middle three columns are columns 4,5,6? Let's index 1-9. In inputs, azure A appears in columns 4 and 6 maybe? Let's view Example1 input rows: Row1: . . . A . A . . . => A at col4 and col6. Row2: . . . A A A . . . => A at col4,5,6. Row3: . . . A A . . . . => A at col4,5. Rows4-6 have Y pattern: plus shape with extra fin left or right? Row4: . . . . . Y . . . => Y at col6? Wait col6? Actually columns: col1-9. Row4 has Y at col6? Let's count: positions: 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 .,9 . So Y at col6. Row5: . . . Y Y Y . . . => Y at col4,5,6. Row6: . . . . Y . . . . => Y at col5? Actually row6: . . . . Y . . . . => Y at col5. So Y forms a plus shape centered at (row5,col5) with extra fin? Actually plus shape would be center plus up/down/left/right. Here we have Y at (row5,col5) center, up at row4,col5? but row4 has Y at col6 not col5. So it's shifted? Let's map coordinates: center maybe at (row5,col5). Up would be row4,col5 but there is no Y there. Instead Y at row4,col6 (right-up diagonal). Down row6,col5 is Y present. Left row5,col4 Y present. Right row5,col6 Y present. So shape is like a T? Actually plus with extra fin left or right? The description: "plus-shaped post with one extra fin jutting to the left or right". So base plus shape (center plus up/down/left/right) plus an extra fin either left or right of the center? In example1, extra fin is at row4,col6 (above right). That's extra fin to the right? Hmm. Weather vane Y pattern: In both examples, Y occupies middle three columns rows 4-6. Let's see Example2 input Y pattern same as example1? Example2 rows 4-6 same as example1: row4 . . . Y . . . . . => Y at col4? Wait row4: ". . . Y . . . . ." => Y at col4. Row5: ". . . Y Y Y . . ." => Y at col4,5,6. Row6: ". . . . Y . . . ." => Y at col5. So here extra fin is at row4,col4 (above left). So extra fin left side. Thus the weather vane orientation indicates direction: extra fin left => wind direction left? Or right? The description: plus-shaped post with one extra fin jutting to the left or right, revealing which way the wind is blowing. So extra fin indicates direction of wind. In example1 extra fin at right (col6) => wind blowing right? So cloud reflection should be placed to the right of original cloud. In output example1, we see additional A's added to the right side of original cloud. Let's compare input vs output example1. Input rows 1-3 have A cloud shape. Output rows 1-3 have more A's. Row1 input: A at col4 and col6. Output row1: ". . . A . A A . A". Let's list columns: col1 .,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 .,6 A,7 A,8 .,9 A? Wait there are 9 columns. Output row1: ". . . A . A A . A". That's columns: 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 .,6 A,7 A,8 .,9 A. So new A at col7 and col9. Original had at col4 and col6. So added A's to the right side (col7,9). Row2 input: A at col4,5,6. Output row2: ". . . A A A A A A". That's A at col4-9 all A except maybe col8? Actually ... [10127 chars truncated]
"A yellow enzyme with a chirality marker catalyzes the mitosis of an azure cell, budding its mirror-image daughter to one side."
120b: k=2
See: An azure organism sits above a yellow enzyme. The enzyme's asymmetric shape hints at a handedness.
Do: The enzyme directs the azure cell to divide, producing a reflected twin on the side the enzyme's extra lobe faces.
Grid: 6 rows by 9 columns, black background. Azure cells occupy a 3×3 region in the top-center; yellow cells occupy a 3×3 region in the bottom-center. The reflected azure twin appears in the formerly empty flank.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 6x9 grid. Azure (A) 3x3 region top-center. Yellow (Y) 3x3 region bottom-center. In example1 input: azure shape? Let's map coordinates. Represent columns 0-8. Input1 rows: r0: ...A.A.. => positions col3 A, col5 A? Actually pattern: "...A . A . . ." So A at col3 and col5. r1: "...AAA..." => A at col3,4,5. r2: "...AA...." => A at col3,4. r3: "... . . Y . . ." => Y at col5? Wait row3: "... . . Y . . ." pattern: "... . . Y . . ." Actually given: ". . . . . Y . . ." So Y at col5. r4: "... Y Y Y . . ." => Y at col3,4,5. r5: "... . Y . . ." => Y at col4? Actually row5: ". . . . Y . . .": Y at col4. So azure block occupies columns 3-5 rows0-2 (3x3). Yellow block occupies columns 3-5 rows3-5 (3x3). So they are stacked vertically. Output1: azure region expanded to right side? Let's see output rows: r0: "...A . A A . A" => A at col3, col5, col6?, col8? Wait pattern: "... A . A A . A". Let's write columns 0-8: col0 .,1.,2.,3 A,4 .,5 A,6 A,7 .,8 A. So new A at col6 and col8. r1: "...AAA A A A" => "... A A A A A A A"? Actually output row1: ". . . A A A A A A". So A at col3,4,5,6,7,8 (full from 3-8). Row2: ". . . A A . . A A" => A at col3,4,7,8. Rows3-5 unchanged (yellow same). So azure twin appears on right side (flank) where extra lobe of enzyme faces? Need to see enzyme shape: Yellow shape is asymmetric? In input1, yellow shape: rows3-5 columns3-5 forms a T? Let's draw: row3 col5 Y (center top). row4 col3-5 Y (full row). row5 col4 Y (center bottom). That's a T shape pointing up? Actually shape looks like a T with stem down? Wait orientation: top of T at row3 col5 (single), middle row4 full, bottom row5 col4 (center). That's like a T rotated? Let's visualize: coordinates relative: center at (row4,col4). Extra lobe? The shape is symmetric? Not exactly. The extra lobe maybe the single Y at top (row3,col5) is extra lobe on right side? Actually the shape is like a Y shape? Let's compare example2. Example2 input: azure shape same? Input2 rows: r0: "...A . A . . ." (same as before) r1: "... . A A . . ." => A at col4,5? Actually row1: ". . . . A A . . ." => A at col4,5. r2: "... . . . A . . ." => A at col5. So azure block is shifted right? Let's map azure region: rows0-2 columns3-5 but pattern different: row0 col3 and col5, row1 col4,5, row2 col5. That's a shape like a diagonal? Not full block. Yellow same as before (same T shape). Output2: azure appears on left side (flank) with some pattern. Output2 rows: r0: "A . A A . A . . ." => A at col0,2,3,5. r1: "A A . . A A . . ." => A at col0,1,4,5. r2: "A . . . . A . . ." => A at col0,5. So azure twin appears on left side (columns0-2). The original azure region remains? Actually original azure region maybe removed? Let's compare: Input azure at columns3-5 rows0-2. Output azure appears at columns0-2 rows0-2, and also maybe original azure still there? Let's check output row0 col3 A? Yes row0 col3 A present (since patt ... [11947 chars truncated]
"A yellow pulsar whose beam skews to one side causes the azure nebula to project its mirror image into the adjacent void."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure nebula glows in the upper sky; a yellow pulsar rotates below with an asymmetric beam pattern.
Do: The nebula's horizontally flipped reflection materializes in the dark region on whichever side the pulsar's beam favors.
Grid: 6×9 star field. Azure nebula centered in top rows; yellow pulsar centered in bottom rows. The reflected nebula appears in the neighboring empty sector.
"A yellow buoy listing to one side tells the azure ship to cast its reflected wake in that direction."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure vessel shape sits in the upper waters; a yellow buoy bobs below with a visible lean to one side.
Do: The vessel's mirror image appears in the waters on the side the buoy leans toward, flush against the original.
Grid: 6×9 ocean chart. Azure ship in top-center columns; yellow buoy in bottom-center columns. The reflected wake fills the adjacent column block.
"A yellow logic gate with an asymmetric input pin mirrors the azure signal pattern to the output bus on the indicated side."
120b: k=1
See: An azure signal pattern occupies the upper circuit board; a yellow gate sits below with one pin offset from symmetry.
Do: The offset pin determines which adjacent bus receives a horizontally flipped copy of the azure signal.
Grid: 6×9 circuit board. Azure signal in top rows 0-2, columns 3-5; yellow gate in bottom rows 3-5, columns 3-5. Mirrored signal appears in the neighboring 3-column bus.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid 6x9. Represent coordinates rows 0-5, cols 0-8. Input example1: Row0: . . . A . A . . . Row1: . . . A A A . . . Row2: . . . A A . . . . Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . Output example1: Row0: . . . A . A A . A Row1: . . . A A A A A A Row2: . . . A A . . A A Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . So transformation added azure (A) copies to right side? Let's see original azure region top rows 0-2, cols 3-5 (as description). Indeed azure pattern shape: Let's map. Input azure cells (A): (0,3), (0,5) (1,3),(1,4),(1,5) (2,3),(2,4) That's shape like a block missing (0,4) and (2,5). Output azure cells added: new A's at positions (0,6),(0,8),(1,6),(1,7),(1,8),(2,7),(2,8). Let's see pattern: horizontally flipped copy placed in neighboring 3-column bus. The bus likely columns 6-8 (right side). Flipping horizontally means mirror across vertical axis of original block? Original block columns 3-5. Flipped would map col 3->5, 4->4,5->3. But also placed offset? Let's compute mapping: For each original A at (r,c), new location maybe (r, c+3?) with column mirrored within block? Let's test: original (0,3) -> new (0,6) (c+3). original (0,5) -> new (0,8) (c+3). original (1,3)->(1,6). (1,4)->(1,7). (1,5)->(1,8). (2,3)->(2,6?) but output has (2,7) and (2,8) not (2,6). Wait output row2 new A's at (2,7) and (2,8). Original (2,3) maybe maps to (2,6) but not present. Original (2,4) maps to (2,7) which is present. So missing (2,6). Also original (2,5) not present originally. So maybe rule: copy only those azure cells that have a corresponding yellow pin offset? Let's examine yellow gate bottom rows 3-5, cols 3-5. Yellow cells Y: (3,5) (4,3),(4,4),(4,5) (5,4) Offset pin: "one pin offset from symmetry". The yellow gate maybe has a missing cell at (3,3) (since shape maybe 3x3 block with missing one). Indeed typical gate shape maybe a 3x3 block of Y with one missing at top-left? Let's see actual Y pattern: rows3-5, cols3-5 forms: Row3: col3 ., col4 ., col5 Y Row4: Y Y Y Row5: col3 ., col4 Y, col5 . So shape is like a plus missing top-left and bottom-left? Not symmetrical. The "offset pin" maybe the Y at (3,5) which is offset from center? The rule: The offset pin determines which adjacent bus receives copy. There are two possible adjacent buses: left (cols0-2) or right (cols6-8). In example, copy went to right bus. So offset pin likely indicates direction: maybe if the missing cell is on left side, copy to right, etc. Let's examine offset pin location relative to center of gate. Center of 3x3 would be (4,4). The offset pin maybe the Y that is not symmetric: there is Y at (3,5) which is top-right corner, while top-left corner missing. So offset to right side => copy to right bus. If offset were left side, copy to left bus. Now test input: we need to see azure pattern same region? Input test: Row0: . . . A . A . . ... [2886 chars truncated]
"A yellow oracle whose crooked staff points to one horizon commands the azure spirit to manifest its twin in reflection there."
120b: k=1
See: An azure spirit form haunts the upper realm; a yellow oracle below clutches a staff that tilts to one side.
Do: The spirit's mirror double appears at the horizon the staff indicates, materializing beside the original.
Grid: 6×9 mythic plane. Azure spirit in top-center 3×3 area; yellow oracle in bottom-center 3×3 area. The reflected spirit fills the adjacent empty columns.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid 6 rows, 9 columns. Represent coordinates (row, col). Let's map. I'll write rows: Row0: . . . A . A . . . Row1: . . . A A A . . . Row2: . . . A A . . . . Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . Output rows: Row0: . . . A . A A . A Row1: . . . A A A A A A Row2: . . . A A . . A A Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . Observations: The lower part (rows 3-5) unchanged. Upper part (rows0-2) changed: added extra A's to the right side. Original azure spirit (A) located in top-center 3x3 area? Let's locate: In input, A's at positions: Row0 col3, col5 Row1 col3,4,5 Row2 col3,4 That's a shape like a 3x3 block missing some cells: basically a 3x3 with missing rightmost column top row? Actually 3x3 area columns 3-5 rows0-2. The pattern: a shape maybe like a "staff tilts to one side"? Not sure. Output adds A's to columns beyond original area: new A's at: Row0 col6? Actually output row0: . . . A . A A . A => columns: 3 A, 5 A, 6 A, 8 A. So added at col6 and col8. Row1: . . . A A A A A A => columns 3,4,5,6,7,8 all A. So added at col6,7,8. Row2: . . . A A . . A A => columns 3,4,6,7,8? Wait row2 output: positions: col3 A, col4 A, col7 A, col8 A. Actually there is '.' at col5, '.' at col6? Let's count: row2 string ". . . A A . . A A". That's columns: 0-2 ., col3 A, col4 A, col5 ., col6 ., col7 A, col8 A. So added at col7,8. So rule seems to reflect the azure shape horizontally to the right side, filling empty columns until maybe hitting edge? The description: "spirit's mirror double appears at the horizon the staff indicates, materializing beside the original." So mirror double appears adjacent to original, maybe to the right side, filling empty columns until edge. In example, original azure shape occupies columns 3-5. Mirror appears to the right, starting at column 6? But not exactly mirror: The pattern seems to be a horizontal reflection of the original shape across a vertical line at the right edge of original? Let's test: Original shape matrix (3x3) rows0-2, cols3-5: Rows: r0: col3 A, col4 ., col5 A r1: col3 A, col4 A, col5 A r2: col3 A, col4 A, col5 . Now reflect horizontally (mirror) to the right side: The mirrored shape would have same pattern but reversed columns: So for each cell (r,c) in original, we place A at (r, mirror_col) where mirror_col = something like (maxcol_of_original + (maxcol_of_original - c))? If original maxcol=5, then mirror of col3 would be 5 + (5-3)=7? Actually distance from left edge of original? Let's compute: offset = c - left = c-3. Mirror offset = (width-1 - offset). width=3. So mirror col = left + (width-1 - offset) = 3 + (2 - offset). For c=3 offset0 => mirror col = 3+2=5 (but that's within original). Not right. Maybe they reflect across the rightmost column of original (col5) to the right side: mirror col = col5 + (col5 - c) + 1? Let's test: For c=3, distance =2, mirror col =5+2+1=8 ... [3508 chars truncated]
"A yellow choreographer whose stance favors one side cues the azure dancer to perform the reversed step in that wing."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure dancer's pose is frozen center-stage above; a yellow choreographer below holds a stance shifted slightly to one side.
Do: The dancer's horizontally mirrored pose appears in the wing the choreographer's stance favors, right next to the original.
Grid: 6×9 dance floor. Azure dancer in top-center 3×3 block; yellow choreographer in bottom-center 3×3 block. Mirrored pose fills the adjacent wing.
"A yellow fault line with an asymmetric pressure ridge pushes the azure crystal to cleave a mirrored twin toward the stressed side."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure crystal formation sits in the upper strata; a yellow fault line below has a pressure ridge that bulges unevenly to one side.
Do: The crystal fractures, and its horizontally flipped twin emerges on the side where the fault's pressure is greatest, abutting the original.
Grid: 6×9 cross-section. Azure crystal in top-center columns; yellow fault in bottom-center columns. The cleaved twin occupies the adjacent column block on the pressured side.
"A yellow mold with an off-center spout pours a flipped azure batter beside the original cake."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure pastry shape sits on a black countertop above a yellow mold with a lopsided spout.
Do: The mold's spout indicates which side of the counter receives a mirror-image copy of the azure pastry.
Grid: 6×9 black surface. The azure pastry is centered in the top half; the yellow mold is centered in the bottom half. The duplicate pastry appears flush against the original on the spout side.
"A yellow conductor whose baton leans to one side cues the azure melody to play its retrograde inversion on that flank of the stage."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure motif is written in the upper staff; a yellow conductor's figure stands in the lower staff with an asymmetric lean.
Do: The conductor signals the azure motif to produce its horizontally reversed echo on the side the baton favors.
Grid: 6 rows × 9 columns. The azure notes cluster in columns 3-5 of the top three rows; the yellow conductor occupies columns 3-5 of the bottom three rows. The reversed echo fills the adjacent empty columns.
"A yellow referee's flag, raised on one side, tells the azure formation to mirror its play to that sideline."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure team formation occupies the center-top of the field; a yellow referee shape stands below with an asymmetric flag.
Do: The formation clones itself in reverse toward whichever sideline the flag indicates.
Grid: 6×9 field. Azure players in the top-center 3×3 zone; yellow referee in the bottom-center 3×3 zone. The mirrored formation appears in the adjacent 3×3 wing.
"A yellow wind rose with a broken spoke tells an azure cloud to cast its reversed shadow on the leeward side."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure cloud pattern floats above a yellow wind rose. The rose is nearly symmetric but has one extra spoke hinting at a prevailing wind.
Do: The cloud's mirror image drifts to the side the broken spoke points toward, settling adjacent to the original.
Grid: 6×9 sky. Azure cloud in top-center columns; yellow wind rose in bottom-center columns. The shadow appears in the neighboring empty columns on the indicated side.
"A yellow cornerstone with an off-center keymark instructs the azure façade to extend a mirrored wing in that direction."
120b: k=1
See: An azure architectural fragment sits in the upper story; a yellow cornerstone with an asymmetric notch sits in the foundation below.
Do: The notch's position dictates which side gains a reflected copy of the azure façade, built flush against the original.
Grid: 6×9 blueprint. Azure fragment centered in the top three rows; yellow cornerstone centered in the bottom three rows. The mirrored wing fills the adjacent vacant columns.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 6 rows x9 columns. Represent coordinates (row0-5, col0-8). Input example1: Row0: . . . A . A . . . Row1: . . . A A A . . . Row2: . . . A A . . . . Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . Output: Row0: . . . A . A A . A Row1: . . . A A A A A A Row2: . . . A A . . A A Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . So transformation added A's (azure) mirrored copies to right side? Let's see original A positions: Original A coordinates: (0,3), (0,5) (1,3),(1,4),(1,5) (2,3),(2,4) So shape: a block of azure in top three rows, leftmost column of shape at col3, rightmost at col5 maybe. Output adds new A's at positions: Row0: col6? Actually output row0: positions: col3 A, col5 A, col6 A?, col8 A? Let's list: row0 output: . . . A . A A . A => A at col3, col5, col6, col8. Row1 output: . . . A A A A A A => A at col3,4,5,6,7,8. Row2 output: . . . A A . . A A => A at col3,4,6,7,8? Wait col6? Actually row2 output: positions: col3 A, col4 A, col7 A, col8 A. (col6 is '.') So new A's added to right side of original shape, but not uniformly; seems mirrored across a vertical line determined by notch Y shape. Yellow Y shape coordinates (input): Row3: col5 Y Row4: col3,4,5 Y Row5: col4 Y That's a Y shape (like a corner notch?). The description: "yellow cornerstone with an asymmetric notch sits in the foundation below." Notch position dictates which side gains reflected copy of azure façade, built flush against original. So notch maybe indicates direction of mirroring: if notch is on right side? Let's see shape of Y: looks like a T? Actually Y shape is like a plus? Let's visualize: Rows 3-5 columns 3-5: Row3: ... . . . . . Y . . . (col5) Row4: ... . . . Y Y Y . . . (col3-5) Row5: ... . . . . Y . . . (col4) So shape is like a "corner" with notch maybe at top? Notch maybe the missing cell at (3,4) and (3,3) etc. The shape is like a "U" missing top left? Not sure. But rule: Mirror azure shape across vertical line that passes through the "notch"? Let's find line of symmetry: maybe the notch is the empty cell adjacent to Y shape? The Y shape is like a "corner" of a 3x3 block missing two cells: missing at (3,3) and (3,4) maybe? Actually 3x3 block would be rows3-5 cols3-5. The Y occupies (3,5), (4,3-5), (5,4). Missing cells: (3,3), (3,4), (5,3), (5,5). Notch maybe the missing cell at (3,4) (center top). Asymmetric notch maybe indicates direction: if notch is on left side? Hmm. In output, azure shape is extended to the right side (columns > original). So mirrored copy placed to the right of original, flush (adjacent) meaning the leftmost column of mirrored copy aligns with column after the rightmost column of original? Let's check: original rightmost A column is col5. In output, new A's appear at col6,7,8 (some). So yes, they start at col6 (adjacent). So mirrored copy of azure shape placed to the right. Thus rule: Determine which ... [4401 chars truncated]
"A yellow signal flag with a torn corner orders the azure battalion to deploy its mirror formation on the indicated flank."
120b: k=1
See: An azure battalion holds the center-top ground; a yellow signal flag occupies the center-bottom with one corner visibly different from the others.
Do: The torn corner points to the flank where the battalion's reversed double takes position beside the original.
Grid: 6×9 battlefield. Azure troops in top columns 3-5; yellow flag in bottom columns 3-5. The mirror battalion occupies the adjacent 3-column flank.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze example. Input grid 6 rows x9 columns. Represent coordinates (row0-5, col0-8). Input example1: Row0: . . . A . A . . . Row1: . . . A A A . . . Row2: . . . A A . . . . Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . Output example1: Row0: . . . A . A A . A Row1: . . . A A A A A A Row2: . . . A A . . A A Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . So transformation added some A's (azure) to right side of original block? Let's map. Original azure block: top rows 0-2, columns 3-5 maybe shape. Let's list azure positions input: Row0 col3 A, col5 A (col4 .) Row1 col3 A, col4 A, col5 A Row2 col3 A, col4 A So shape: a kind of L? Actually looks like a 3x3 block missing some cells: positions (0,3),(0,5),(1,3,4,5),(2,3,4). That's like a shape with a missing (0,4) and (2,5) and (1,2?) not relevant. Output azure positions: same original plus new ones: Row0: col3 A (same), col5 A (same), plus col6 A? Actually output row0: ". . . A . A A . A" => columns: 0-8. Let's index: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 A,4 .,5 A,6 A,7 .,8 A. So new A at col6 and col8. Row1 output: ". . . A A A A A A": columns 3-8 all A? col3 A,4 A,5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A. So new A at col6,7,8. Row2 output: ". . . A A . . A A": columns 3 A,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 A,8 A. New A at col7,8. Thus new azure added to the right side, forming a mirrored copy? The description: "battalion reversed double takes position beside the original". So we take the original azure shape, reflect horizontally (mirror) and place adjacent to the right (flank). The original occupies columns 3-5. Mirror would occupy columns? If original width 3 (col3-5). Mirror placed adjacent to right, maybe starting at col6? Mirror of shape would be reversed left-right. Let's compute mirror of original shape within its bounding box (3x3). Original shape matrix (rows0-2, cols3-5): Rows: r0: [A, ., A] (col3 A,4 .,5 A) r1: [A, A, A] r2: [A, A, .] Mirror horizontally gives: r0: [A, ., A] (same symmetric) r1: [A, A, A] (same) r2: [., A, A] Now place this mirrored shape adjacent to right of original, i.e., starting at col6 (original max col5 +1). So columns 6-8. Let's see if output matches: For each row, columns 6-8 should be mirror shape. Row0 col6-8: [A, ., A] matches output row0 col6 A, col7 ., col8 A. Yes. Row1 col6-8: [A, A, A] matches output row1 col6 A,7 A,8 A. Yes. Row2 col6-8: [., A, A] matches output row2 col6 .,7 A,8 A. Yes. Thus rule: Identify a colored region (azure) located centrally top (columns 3-5). Mirror it horizontally and place adjacent to the right side (flank). The yellow flag at bottom remains unchanged. Now test input: Input test: Row0: . . . A . A . . . Row1: . . . . A A . . . Row2: . . . A . . . . . Row3: . . . . . Y . . . Row4: . . . Y Y Y . . . Row5: . . . . Y . . . . We need to apply same transformation: find azure region (A) top columns 3-5? Let's list azure positions: Row0 col3 A, col5 A (col4 .) Row1 col4 A, col5 A (col3 .) R ... [1884 chars truncated]
"A yellow stage director whose spotlight favors one wing sends the azure actor to perform their scene in reverse on that side."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure performer's silhouette is center-stage above; a yellow director below has an asymmetric posture leaning toward one wing.
Do: The performer's mirror image appears in the wing the director favors, acting out the scene in horizontal reverse.
Grid: 6×9 stage. Azure silhouette in top-center 3×3 block; yellow director in bottom-center 3×3 block. The reflected performance fills the adjacent wing columns.
"A yellow trellis with one extra branch guides the azure vine to grow a mirrored twin toward that side of the garden bed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure vine pattern grows in the center-top of a garden bed; a yellow trellis below has an almost-symmetric shape with one distinguishing branch.
Do: The extra branch indicates where the vine's reflected double sprouts, growing flush beside the original.
Grid: 6×9 garden bed. Azure vine in top rows 0-2, columns 3-5; yellow trellis in bottom rows 3-5, columns 3-5. The twin vine fills the adjacent 3×3 plot.
See: The input grid has a black background with a single 2x2 colored seed pattern placed somewhere in the grid. The seed contains four colored cells arranged in a 2x2 block (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right), where each cell is a non-black color. The seed's four colors define a quadrant pattern.
Do: Starting from the 2x2 seed pattern, generate a series of scaled copies at exponentially increasing sizes, each placed immediately to the right of the previous one and vertically centered on the seed's position. Specifically: Level 0 is the original 2x2 seed (each cell is 1x1). Level 1 doubles the scale: each of the four quadrant colors becomes a 2x2 block, producing a 4x4 region placed directly to the right of level 0 and centered vertically on the seed. Level 2 doubles again: each quadrant color becomes a 4x4 block, producing an 8x8 region placed to the right of level 1, centered on the seed. Continue doubling (level n has cell size 2^n, producing a region of size 2^(n+1) x 2^(n+1)) until the grid's right edge is reached. At every level, the 2x2 quadrant arrangement is preserved: top-left quadrant uses the seed's top-left color, top-right uses the seed's top-right color, bottom-left uses the seed's bottom-left color, bottom-right uses the seed's bottom-right color. Each level's region is vertically centered on the seed's center row. Cells that fall outside the grid boundaries remain black.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background is black. The seed pattern remains at its original position. The scaled copies expand rightward from the seed, filling the grid toward the right edge. The vertical extent of each level is centered on the seed's vertical midpoint, growing symmetrically upward and downward. No content extends to the left of the seed.
"A seed crystal grows into ever-larger reflections of itself, each generation dwarfing the last."
120b: k=1
See: In a vast dark field, a tiny 2×2 embryo sits quietly — four colored organs packed into one small heart. Each quadrant holds a different hue, like the four chambers of a beating heart waiting to pump life outward.
Do: The heart begins to beat. With each pulse, it projects a shadow of itself to the right — but each shadow is twice the size of the last, as if viewed through a succession of magnifying glasses lined up in a row. The first echo is a 4×4 ghost, the next an 8×8 phantom, then 16×16, and so on, each one faithfully preserving the four-chambered arrangement of the original heart, just writ larger and larger. The echoes march rightward like Russian nesting dolls laid open in a line, smallest to largest, until they crash against the edge of the world. Each echo is vertically anchored to the heartbeat's center, growing equally above and below like a tree branching symmetrically from its trunk.
Grid: The dark field stays the same size. The original heart never moves. Its echoes only radiate to the right, never to the left. Where an echo would extend beyond the sky or below the earth, it simply doesn't exist — the darkness holds. The four colors in each echo always sit in the same quadrant positions as the original: upper-left stays upper-left, lower-right stays lower-right, like a flag whose design never rotates no matter how large the banner grows.
We need to understand rule. From description: original 2x2 embryo somewhere in grid. It stays same. Echoes to the right, each larger by factor 2 each step (size doubles). They are anchored vertically centered on original's center, expanding equally up/down. They are placed to the right, not overlapping? In example 1, input shows a 2x2 block at rows 5-6? Let's map coordinates. Input grid size? appears 10 rows, 14 columns? Actually given lines: first row ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (14). So 10 rows, 14 columns. Input has R X at (row5 col1?) Let's index rows starting 1. Row5: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." So R at col1, X at col2. Row6: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." So X at col1, G at col2. That's a 2x2 block top-left corner of grid. Output: same size grid 10x14. Let's see output rows. Row1 all dots. Row2: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" So starting at col7? Let's count: columns 1-6 dots, then R repeated 4, X repeated 4. So a 4x4 echo placed starting column7? Row2 corresponds to top part of 4x4 block? The original 2x2 block is at rows5-6, cols1-2. Its center is between rows5-6? Actually 2x2 center is between those cells. For vertical anchoring, the 4x4 block should be centered on same vertical center, meaning its rows should be rows4-7? Since original rows5-6, center between 5 and6. A 4x4 block centered would occupy rows4-7 (since height 4). Indeed output rows4-7 contain pattern. Check output rows4-7 columns? Row4: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". That's columns 3-? Let's count: col1-2 dots, then R R X X (first 4 columns of block?), then R R R R X X X X (second 4?). Wait pattern: The 4x4 block should be composed of 2x2 pattern scaled by 2: each original cell becomes 2x2 block of same color. Original arrangement: R X X G Scaled 2x2 each => 4x4: R R X X R R X X X X G G X X G G Now output shows something like that but also repeated? Actually they placed two copies? Let's examine output rows2-3: they have R R R R X X X X (8 columns). That's like two 4x4 blocks side by side? Wait row2: after 6 dots, there are 4 R then 4 X. That's 8 columns. Row3 same. Row4: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". That's 2 dots then 2 R,2 X, then 4 R,4 X? Not matching. Maybe the echo pattern repeats horizontally as it expands: each echo is twice size of previous, but placed to the right, not overlapping, so they are tiled horizontally: first echo 4x4 placed immediately right of original (starting col3?). But output shows first echo starting at col3? Actually original occupies col1-2. 4x4 echo would occupy cols3-6. But output rows4-7 columns3-6 show pattern? Let's check row4 col3-6: "R R X X" matches top row of scaled block. Row5 col3-6: "R R X X"? Row5 line: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". Let's parse row5: col1 R, col2 X (original), col3 space? Actually row5: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". So after original two cells, we have "R R X X" (col3-6) which matches top row of block. Row6: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". After original "X G", we have "X X G G". That's second row of ... [9215 chars truncated]
"A fertilized egg undergoes mitotic division, each daughter cell cluster preserving the original four-tissue arrangement but doubling in mass, the organism elongating in one direction as it grows through successive developmental stages."
120b: k=2
See: A tiny embryo of four distinct tissue types rests in a vast dark womb.
Do: The embryo divides repeatedly, each generation twice the size of the last, stretching the organism rightward while maintaining the same four-tissue body plan at every scale.
Grid: The womb stays dark. The embryo and all its scaled offspring are anchored to the same central axis, growing only toward one side.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input small 10x? Actually 10 rows, 14 columns? Example1 input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. There is a 2x2 block? Let's examine. Example1 input: rows 0-9, columns 0-13. Non-black cells: at (4,0)=R, (4,1)=X, (5,0)=X, (5,1)=G. So a 2x2 pattern: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. That's the "embryo". Output shows a larger pattern extending rightwards, with repeated scaling. Output grid same size 10x14. The pattern appears to be a 4x4 block repeated? Let's view output rows. Row0 all . (black). Row1: columns 6-9 R, columns 10-13 X. Actually row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X". So positions 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row2 same as row1. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". So columns 2-3 R, 4-5 X, 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G". Row8 same as row7. Row9 all . . Observing pattern: It seems the original 2x2 embryo is being expanded by repeatedly doubling size each generation, anchored at left side? Actually embryo at leftmost columns rows 4-5. In output, we see a fractal-like pattern where the 2x2 pattern is tiled in a larger shape that grows rightwards and also up/down. Specifically, the pattern appears to be a 4x4 block formed by scaling the 2x2 by factor 2: each cell becomes 2x2 block? Let's test: original 2x2: R X X G Scale factor 2: each cell becomes 2x2 of same color? That would produce 4x4: R R X X R R X X X X G G X X G G But output shows something more complex: The region rows 3-6, cols 2-5 maybe matches that? Let's extract rows3-6, cols2-5: Row3 cols2-5: R R X X Row4 cols2-5: R R X X? Actually row4 col2=R, col3=R, col4=X, col5=X yes. Row5 cols2-5: X X G G? Row5 col2=X,3=X,4=G,5=G yes. Row6 cols2-5: X X G G? Row6 col2=., wait row6 col2 is '.'? Actually row6 line: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G". So col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 X col3 X col4 G col5 G. So matches. Thus a 4x4 block appears at rows3-6, cols2-5, which is the scaled embryo (factor2). Similarly there is a larger block factor4? At rows1-8, cols6-13 maybe? Let's see rows1-8, cols6-13: Row1 col6-13: R R R R X X X X (4R then 4X). Row2 same. Row3 col6-13: R R R R X X X X. Row4 same. Row5 col6-13: X X X X G G G G. Row6 same. Row7 col6-13: X X X X G G G G. Row8 same. That's an 8x8 block (rows1-8, cols6-13) which is scaling factor 4 (since original 2x2 -> 8x8). Indeed each original cell becomes 4x4 block? Let's test: original R becomes 4x4 of R? In 8x8 block, top-left quadrant (rows1-4, cols6-9) is all R (4x4). Top-right quadrant (rows1-4, cols10-13) is all X (4x4). Bottom-left (rows5-8, cols6-9) is all X (4x4). Bottom-right (rows5-8, cols10-13) is all G (4x4). Yes matches. Thus rule: Starting from a small pattern (embryo) located somewhere near left side, we generate scaled copies of it anchored at same central axis (maybe the leftmost column of embryo is the axis). The scaling occurs repeatedly, each generation doub ... [8542 chars truncated]
"A four-star system emits gravitational echoes — each echo manifests as a larger replica of the original constellation, expanding outward through space in one direction, each apparition doubling in scale."
120b: fail
See: Four colored stars form a tight cluster in a dark void.
Do: Successive gravitational echoes appear at doubling scales, each materializing immediately beyond the last and preserving the original four-star arrangement, all centered on the cluster's midpoint.
Grid: The void remains dark. Echoes propagate in one direction, vertically symmetric around the original cluster.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x14? Actually example input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. Output 10 rows, 14 columns. Input had a small cluster: at rows 5-6 (0-index?) Let's index rows starting 0. Input rows: 0-3 all dots. Row4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Rows6-9 all dots. So cluster of four colored stars? Actually we have R at (4,0), X at (4,1), X at (5,0), G at (5,1). That's a 2x2 block: R X / X G. That's four colored stars? Colors: R, X, X, G. X is grey. So cluster of four colored stars (maybe includes grey). The description: "Four colored stars form a tight cluster in a dark void." So yes. Transformation: "Successive gravitational echoes appear at doubling scales, each materializing immediately beyond the last and preserving the original four-star arrangement, all centered on the cluster's midpoint. Grid details: the void remains dark. Echoes propagate in one direction, vertically symmetric around the original cluster." Interpretation: We need to replicate the pattern at larger scales, doubling each time, placed beyond the last, preserving arrangement, centered on cluster's midpoint, propagate in one direction, vertically symmetric around original cluster. Look at output: Let's examine output grid 10x14. Output rows: 0: all dots. 1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" 2: same as row1. 3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X" 4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X" 5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G" 6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G" 7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G" 8: same as row7. 9: all dots. We need to see pattern. Original cluster at rows4-5, cols0-1. In output, that region now appears at left side of larger pattern. The pattern seems to expand to the right (one direction) and also vertically symmetric around original cluster (i.e., both up and down). The pattern appears as a series of blocks of size doubling each echo? Let's map coordinates. Let's define original cluster size = 2x2. Its midpoint? For even size, midpoint maybe between cells? But they say centered on cluster's midpoint. Echoes appear at doubling scales, each materializing immediately beyond the last. So first echo maybe size 4x4? Actually output shows a larger pattern extending to right up to column 13. Let's compute. Original cluster occupies columns 0-1 rows 4-5. Output shows pattern extends to columns up to 13 (0-index). That's width 14. So pattern seems to be repeated with scaling factor 2 each time? Let's examine pattern of colors. Take original 2x2 block: [ [R, X], [X, G] ] Now output region rows4-5 columns0-1 matches original: row4 col0=R, col1=X; row5 col0=X, col1=G. Good. Now look at rows4-5 columns2-3? Row4 col2=R, col3=R? Actually row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". Let's index: col0 R,1 X,2 R,3 R,4 X,5 X,6 R,7 R,8 R,9 R,10 X,11 X,12 X,13 X. Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". So pattern seems to be original block repeated with scaling? Let's view as 2x2 block repeated in a larger pattern where each cell becomes a 2x2 ... [11302 chars truncated]
"A message in a bottle carries a four-colored signal flag. Each wave that catches the bottle unfurls a larger copy of the flag on the water's surface, the replicas doubling with each swell as they stretch toward the horizon."
120b: fail
See: A tiny four-colored flag floats on a dark sea.
Do: Each wave produces a flag twice the previous size, laid on the surface immediately beyond the last, maintaining the original quadrant colors, all centered on the original flag's waterline.
Grid: The sea stays dark. Flags unfurl in one direction, each centered vertically on the original.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x14? Let's count. Input example lines: 10 rows, each 14 columns. Output also 10 rows, 14 columns. Input shows a small 2x2 flag? Let's map coordinates. Input has R at (row4? actually zero-index). Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-13. Rows: 0-3 all dots. Row4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." So at (4,0)=R, (4,1)=X. Row5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." So (5,0)=X, (5,1)=G. Rows6-9 all dots. So a 2x2 pattern: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. That's like a flag quadrants: maybe colors: R top-left, X top-right, X bottom-left, G bottom-right. Actually bottom-left X, bottom-right G. Output shows larger pattern: seems to have expanded flag to size 4x4? Let's examine output rows 0-9. Row0 all dots. Row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" So columns 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row1 has 4 R then 4 X. Row2 same as row1. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X" So columns 2-3 R, 4-5 X, 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X" Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G" Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G" Row7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G" Row8 same as row7. Row9 all dots. So pattern seems to be original flag at top-left corner (row4 col0) remains? Actually original R at (4,0) still there. X at (4,1) still there. X at (5,0) still there. G at (5,1) still there. So original 2x2 stays. Then there are additional copies of the flag placed to the right and down? The description: "Each wave produces a flag twice the previous size, laid on the surface immediately beyond the last, maintaining the original quadrant colors, all centered on the original flag's waterline. Flags unfurl in one direction, each centered vertically on the original." Interpretation: Starting flag size 2x2. Next flag size 4x4 placed immediately to the right of previous flag (beyond the last), centered vertically on original flag's waterline (i.e., same vertical center). So the 4x4 flag's vertical center aligns with original flag's vertical center (which is between rows 4 and5? Actually original 2x2 occupies rows4-5, columns0-1. Its vertical center is between rows4 and5 (midline). So the 4x4 flag should be centered on that line, meaning it extends 2 rows above and 2 rows below that line: rows3-6? Indeed rows3-6 contain the 4x4 block? Let's see rows3-6 columns2-9 maybe. Rows3-6 columns2-9 show pattern: a 4x4 flag with quadrants: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G? Let's examine rows3-6, cols2-9: Row3 col2-5: R R X X ; col6-9: R R X X? Wait row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". So cols2-3 R,R ; 4-5 X,X ; 6-9 R,R,R,R ; 10-13 X,X,X,X. So the 4x4 block maybe columns2-5? Actually 4x4 would be cols2-5 (4 columns) and rows3-6 (4 rows). Let's extract rows3-6, cols2-5: Row3 cols2-5: R R X X Row4 cols2-5: R R X X Row5 cols2-5: X X G G? Wait row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". cols2-5: X X G G (since col0 X,1 G,2 X,3 X,4 G,5 G). So row5 cols2-5 = X X G G. Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G". cols2-5: X X G G. Thus 4x4 block patte ... [6432 chars truncated]
"A pixel on a display triggers a cascade through a doubling circuit — each stage reads the pixel's four-color subpixel arrangement, renders it at twice the resolution, and outputs the enlarged pattern to the next stage along a single bus."
120b: k=1
See: A four-colored pixel glows on a dark screen.
Do: Each circuit stage doubles the pixel's dimensions and renders the result immediately adjacent, preserving the subpixel quadrant layout, all stages aligned on the original pixel's center row.
Grid: The screen is dark. Enlarged copies cascade in one direction, vertically centered on the source pixel.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x14? Actually example input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. Output also 10 rows, 14 columns. Input has a 2x2 pattern? Let's map coordinates. Input: rows 0-9, cols 0-13. Non-black cells: at (4,0)=R, (4,1)=X, (5,0)=X, (5,1)=G. So a 2x2 block: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. Output shows larger pattern: seems each stage doubles dimensions and renders adjacent preserving quadrant layout, aligned on original pixel's center row. Let's examine output: non-black region appears larger, maybe 8x8? Let's locate output non-black region rows 1-8, cols 5-12? Actually output rows 1-8 have content. Let's extract subgrid rows 1-8, cols 5-12 (0-index). Row1: columns 5-12: R R R R X X X X. Row2 same. Row3: col4? Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". That's 14 columns. Let's locate pattern: It seems original 2x2 block expanded to 8x8? Original size 2, after 2 stages doubling each stage => 2*2*2 =8. So final block size 8x8. The block is placed such that its center aligns with original pixel's center row? "cascading in one direction, vertically centered on the source pixel." Means copies placed to the right? In output, original block at left side? Let's see original R at (4,0). In output, there is R at (4,0) still? Yes output row4 col0 = R. So original remains. Then enlarged copies appear to the right (adjacent) preserving quadrant layout. So we have original 2x2 at leftmost, then to its right we have larger copies? Actually output shows pattern extending to right columns up to 13. The original 2x2 appears at leftmost columns 0-1 rows 4-5. Then there is a 4x4 block? Let's examine output rows 3-6 cols 2-5 maybe. Row3 (index3) has ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". So columns 2-3 = R R, 4-5 = X X, then columns 6-9 = R R R R, 10-13 = X X X X. So seems after original 2x2, there is a 4x4 block (doubling) placed adjacent to the right, preserving quadrant layout: the 2x2 quadrants become each 2x2? Actually original quadrants: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. In 4x4 block, each quadrant is a 2x2 copy of original? Let's check: In 4x4 region (cols2-5 rows2-5?) Let's extract rows2-5 cols2-5. Row2 (index2) columns2-5: R R X X. Row3 columns2-5: R R X X. Row4 columns2-5: R R X X? Actually row4 is "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". columns2-5: R R X X. Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". columns2-5: X X G G? Wait row5 col2 = X, col3 = X, col4 = G, col5 = G. So bottom-left quadrant (rows4-5, cols2-3) should be X X (matches original bottom-left X). bottom-right quadrant (rows4-5, cols4-5) should be G G (original bottom-right G). So indeed each quadrant is scaled by factor 2 (each pixel becomes 2x2 block). So the 4x4 block is a scaled version of original 2x2. Then further to the right, there is an 8x8 block (doubling again) covering columns6-13 rows1-8. That block is scaling of the 4x4? Actually each pixel of 4x4 becomes 2x2, resulting in 8x8. So overall rule: Starting from original pattern, repeated ... [7403 chars truncated]
"A four-faced idol is discovered in a dark temple. Each prayer spoken before it conjures a larger idol of the same form beside it — a procession of ever-growing icons stretching toward the temple's far wall."
120b: k=2
See: A small four-colored idol sits in a dark temple.
Do: Each invocation doubles the idol's size and places the new one immediately beside the last, preserving the four-faced color arrangement, all aligned on the original idol's center.
Grid: The temple stays dark. Idols grow in one direction, vertically symmetric about the original.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input small pattern of 2x? Actually first example input shows a 5x? Let's map. Example1 input grid size 10 rows x 14 columns? Actually given rows lines. Input shows 10 rows, each with 14 entries. Non-empty cells: at row5 col1 R, row5 col2 X? Wait coordinates: rows start 0? Let's index. Rows (0-index): 0 all . 1 all . 2 all . 3 all . 4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." 5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." 6-9 all . So pattern is a 2x2 block of colors: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. That's a 2x2 "idol". Output grid size same 10x14. Output shows expanded pattern: appears to double size and replicate horizontally? Let's examine output rows. Output rows: 0 all . 1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" 2: same as row1 3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X" 4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X" 5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G" 6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G" 7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G" 8: same as row7 9 all . We see original 2x2 block at rows4-5, cols0-1? Actually original at rows4-5, cols0-1. In output, that region expanded to larger pattern covering rows3-6? Let's locate original pattern within output: At output row4 col0 is R (same), col1 is X (same). So original top-left cell remains at same position. The pattern seems to have been expanded outward to the right and down, preserving center alignment? The description: "Each invocation doubles the idol's size and places the new one immediately beside the last, preserving the four-faced color arrangement, all aligned on the original idol's center. Idols grow in one direction, vertically symmetric about the original." Interpretation: Starting with a 2x2 block. Doubling size means each cell becomes a 2x2 block? But output shows larger pattern not just scaling each cell. Let's think: Doubling size of idol (the 2x2) would become 4x4 block with same arrangement? But output shows 4x4? Actually final pattern seems 8x8? Let's count region of colors: In output rows1-8 columns? Let's find extents: Non-blank region appears columns 2-13? Actually row1 has colors from col6? Wait row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X". That's 14 columns. So colors start at col6 (0-index). Row1 has 4 R then 4 X. Row2 same. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". So pattern expands leftwards as well. It seems the idol is being tiled horizontally to the right, and also mirrored vertically? Let's examine pattern of colors: The original 2x2 pattern (R X / X G). Output seems to have a 8x8 region of colors (rows1-8, cols2-13?) Let's extract subgrid rows1-8, cols2-13 (12 columns). Actually there are 12 columns of colors maybe representing 3 copies? Let's compute: The pattern appears to be 4 copies horizontally? In row1: RRRRXXXX (4 each). That's 8 columns. Row3: RRXXRRRRXXXX (2R2X then 4R4X). Hmm. Maybe rule: Starting with 2x2 pattern, we repeatedly "invoke" (maybe each step adds another copy adjacent to previous, aligning centers). The output shows 3 invocations? Let's see: Original at position ... [11021 chars truncated]
"Four dancers in colored costumes hold a tight square formation. The choreographer mirrors the formation at double scale with new dancers beside them, then again at quadruple, the troupe line extending across the stage in exponential lockstep."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four costumed dancers form a small square on a dark stage.
Do: Each choreographic echo doubles the formation size and places it immediately beside the previous one, keeping each dancer's quadrant color, all formations centered on the original group's height.
Grid: The stage is dark. Formations extend in one direction, centered on the original square's vertical midpoint.
"A four-mineral crystal inclusion is exposed at a cliff face. Tectonic pressure extrudes copies of the inclusion at doubling scales, each new layer of rock face revealing a larger version of the same mineral arrangement."
120b: k=2
See: A tiny four-colored mineral inclusion sits on a dark rock face.
Do: Each tectonic extrusion doubles the inclusion's scale and deposits it immediately beside the last, preserving the four-mineral quadrant pattern, centered on the original inclusion's depth.
Grid: The rock face remains dark. Extrusions extend in one direction, vertically centered on the original inclusion.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grid with a small 2x2? Actually in example1 input: there is a 2x2 pattern? Let's view. Example1 input grid size 10x14? Actually given 10 rows, 14 columns. The non-black cells are at rows 5-6 (0-index?). Let's index rows starting 0. Rows: 0-3 all . Row4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Rows6-9 all . So a 2x2 block at top-left of non-empty area: pattern: R X X G So four colors: R, X, G, X? Actually pattern is: [ (0,0)=R, (0,1)=X (1,0)=X, (1,1)=G ] So a 2x2 block with R top-left, X top-right, X bottom-left, G bottom-right. Output grid size same 10x14. Output shows a larger pattern: appears to have duplicated and scaled. Let's examine output rows 0-9. Row0 all . Row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" Row2 same as row1. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X" Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X" Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G" Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G" Row7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G" Row8 same as row7. Row9 all . Observations: The original 2x2 block appears at rows4-5, cols0-1? Actually output row4 col0 = R, col1 = X (original). Row5 col0 = X, col1 = G (original). So original block remains at same location (top-left of pattern). Then extrusions extend to the right (east) and down? Actually pattern expands to right and down, but description says extrusions extend in one direction, vertically centered on original inclusion. Wait metaphor: "Extrusions extend in one direction, vertically centered on the original inclusion." Means duplication horizontally? Actually "one direction" maybe to the right, and vertically centered meaning the pattern is duplicated vertically symmetric about original's vertical center line? Let's analyze. The output shows a larger pattern that seems to be a 4x? maybe 8x? Let's see the pattern of colors: It seems to be a 4x4 block repeated? Let's extract the 4x4 quadrant pattern maybe. Look at rows4-5 and columns0-? The pattern seems to be a 4x4 block of colors replicating the original 2x2 pattern scaled by factor 2? Let's compute scaling factor 2: each original cell becomes a 2x2 block? For example original R at (0,0) becomes a 2x2 block of R in output? Let's see output rows4-5, cols0-1: we have R X on row4, X G on row5. That's original not scaled. But later we see R R at row4 col2-3? Actually row4 col2 = R, col3 = R. Row4 col4 = X, col5 = X. So there is a 2x2 block of R at (row4, col2-3) and (row5, col2-3) maybe? Let's check row5 col2-3: row5 col2 = X, col3 = X. So not R. Hmm. Let's map coordinates. I'll write output grid with indices. Rows 0-9, cols 0-13. Row0: all . Row1: cols6-9 = R, cols10-13 = X? Actually row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X" So col0-5 '.'; col6-9 R; col10-13 X. Row2 same. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X" So col0-1 '.'; col2-3 R; col4-5 X; col6-9 R; col10-13 X. Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X" col0 R,1 X,2 R,3 R,4 X,5 X,6 R,7 R,8 R,9 R,10 X,11 X,12 X,13 X Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G ... [10361 chars truncated]
"A single pat of layered butter is folded into dough again and again — each fold doubles the layers while preserving the original arrangement of flavors, the pastry stretching longer across the countertop with every turn."
120b: k=2
See: Four flavors are pressed into a tiny square on a dark marble counter.
Do: Each lamination doubles the square's dimensions and places the new sheet beside the previous one, always keeping the four flavors in their original quadrant positions.
Grid: The counter remains clean marble. Layers accumulate rightward from the original pat, centered vertically on where the butter was placed.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Four flavors are pressed into a tiny square on a dark marble counter. Each lamination doubles the square's dimensions and places the new sheet beside the previous one, always keeping the four flavors in their original quadrant positions. Layers accumulate rightward from the original pat, centered vertically on where the butter was placed." Interpretation: Input contains a small 2x2 pattern? In examples, input grid 10x14? Actually example 1 input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. The non-empty region appears in top-left quadrant? Let's examine example1 input: rows 0-9, columns 0-13. Non-zero cells: at (4,0)=R, (4,1)=X, (5,0)=X, (5,1)=G. So a 2x2 block: rows 4-5, cols 0-1. Colors: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. That's four flavors. Output grid same size 10x14. Output shows pattern expanded to rightwards with repeated blocks? Let's view output rows 0-9. Row0 all dots. Row1: columns 6-9 R, columns 10-13 X. Row2 same. Row3: columns 2-3 R, 4-5 X, 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row4: columns0 R,1 X,2-5 R,6-9 R,10-13 X. Row5: col0 X,1 G,2-3 X,4-5 G,6-9 X,10-13 G. Row6: col2-3 X,4-5 G,6-9 X,10-13 G. Row7: col6-9 X,10-13 G. Row8 same. Row9 all dots. Seems like the original 2x2 block is being tiled in a pattern that expands outward? "Each lamination doubles the square's dimensions and places the new sheet beside the previous one, always keeping the four flavors in their original quadrant positions." So start with 2x2 block. Double dimensions => 4x4 block? Place new sheet beside previous one (to the right). So we have original 2x2 at left, then a 2x2? Wait doubling dimensions means each lamination creates a larger square that contains previous pattern scaled? Maybe they are performing a recursive construction similar to a fractal: start with 2x2 pattern. Then create a 4x4 pattern where each quadrant is a copy of original 2x2? But "keeping the four flavors in their original quadrant positions" suggests that the quadrants correspond to original colors: top-left quadrant gets top-left color (R), top-right gets top-right (X), bottom-left gets bottom-left (X), bottom-right gets bottom-right (G). So the 4x4 would have each quadrant filled uniformly with that color? Let's test: 4x4 would have top-left 2x2 all R, top-right 2x2 all X, bottom-left 2x2 all X, bottom-right 2x2 all G. That matches part of output? Look at rows 3-4? Actually output rows 3-4 columns 2-5 maybe correspond to 4x4 block? Row3 col2-3 R, col4-5 X. Row4 col2-3 R, col4-5 X. That's top half of 4x4. Bottom half rows5-6 col2-3 X, col4-5 G. Indeed rows5 col2-3 X, col4-5 G; row6 same. So 4x4 block appears starting at column2 row3? Yes. Then next lamination doubles again to 8x8 placed to the right of previous? "Layers accumulate rightward from the original pat, centered vertically on where the butter was placed." So we have original 2x2 at leftmost (col0-1 rows4-5). Then 4x4 placed to its right? Actually 4x4 appears starting at col2 row3, overlapping ve ... [8929 chars truncated]
"A quartet plays a four-note motif, then each instrument's phrase is doubled in duration and harmonized outward in successive movements, the symphony swelling rightward across the score like an unrolling scroll."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four colored voices sit together in a tiny chord on an otherwise silent staff.
Do: Each movement reprises the same four-voice arrangement at twice the previous duration, appended to the right of the last movement, all centered on the original chord's pitch.
Grid: Silence surrounds the music. The score extends only to the right, each movement taller and wider, vertically balanced around the opening chord.
"A relay team of four runners passes a baton, and at each exchange zone the track widens and the runners' strides double in length, the race stretching outward from the starting block in one direction while each runner keeps their original lane position."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four athletes crouch in a tight 2x2 starting formation on an empty dark field.
Do: At each leg of the relay, the formation doubles in size and is placed immediately ahead of the previous one, preserving each runner's quadrant.
Grid: The field stays dark. The race extends only forward (rightward), each leg centered on the original formation's midline.
"A tiny pressure cell with four distinct air masses spawns a larger copycat system downwind, and that system spawns one larger still — each weather front doubling in diameter as it propagates across the map."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Four colored air masses form a small pressure cell on a dark meteorological chart.
Do: The cell replicates downwind at doubling scales, each replica preserving the four-quadrant arrangement of air masses and stacking immediately beside the last.
Grid: The chart remains dark except for the chain of systems, which grow rightward and stay vertically centered on the original cell.
"A cornerstone is laid with four colored tiles in a square. The architect then builds a pavilion around it at double scale using the same tile pattern, then a hall around that, each structure doubling and extending the facade in one direction."
120b: k=2
See: A four-tile cornerstone sits on a dark blueprint.
Do: Each successive structure doubles the tile scale and is erected immediately to the right of the previous one, replicating the cornerstone's four-quadrant color scheme at every level.
Grid: The blueprint stays blank. Buildings extend only rightward from the cornerstone, their heights centered on the stone's position.
We need to infer rule. From description: "four-tile cornerstone sits on a dark blueprint." Input shows a 2x2 block (cornerstone) at leftmost columns? In example1 input: grid 10x14? Actually 10 rows, 14 columns. The cornerstone appears at rows 4-5? Let's map coordinates. Input example1 rows (0-index). Row4: "R X . . ..." Row5: "X G . . ..." So a 2x2 block: top-left R, top-right X, bottom-left X, bottom-right G. That's the cornerstone. Output shows pattern expanding to right: each successive structure doubles tile scale and is erected immediately to the right of the previous one, replicating the cornerstone's four-quadrant color scheme at every level. So we start with 2x2 block (scale 1). Next structure scale 2? Means each tile becomes 2x2 block? Actually output shows larger pattern. Let's examine output example1. Output grid 10x14 same size. Right side shows repeated pattern of 4 colors: R, X, G, maybe? Let's view output rows. I'll rewrite output example1 rows (10 rows, 14 columns): Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . R R R R X X X X Row2: . . . . . . R R R R X X X X Row3: . . R R X X R R R R X X X X Row4: R X R R X X R R R R X X X X Row5: X G X X G G X X X X G G G G Row6: . . X X G G X X X X G G G G Row7: . . . . . . X X X X G G G G Row8: . . . . . . X X X X G G G G Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Observations: The pattern seems to be building blocks of size doubling each step: first 2x2 cornerstone at columns 0-1 rows4-5. Then next structure of size 4x4 placed to right starting column2? Actually columns 2-5 maybe? Let's see rows4-5 columns2-5: row4 col2-5: R R X X (matches top row of 4x4 block?). Row5 col2-5: X X G G. That seems like scaling factor 2: each original tile becomes 2x2 block? Original 2x2: [R X; X G]. Scale 2 would produce 4x4 where each original cell becomes 2x2 of same color. Indeed: top-left R becomes 2x2 R's at rows4-5 cols2-3? Wait row4 col2-3 are R R, row5 col2-3 are X X (not R). Hmm not matching. Let's think differently: The pattern maybe is constructing a fractal like a Sierpinski carpet? Actually "Each successive structure doubles the tile scale and is erected immediately to the right of the previous one, replicating the cornerstone's four-quadrant color scheme at every level." So we have structures placed side by side, each larger than previous, each replicating the 2x2 pattern but scaled. So first structure: size 2 (the cornerstone). Second structure: size 4 placed to right of first, starting at column2? Actually first occupies columns0-1 rows4-5. Second occupies columns2-5 rows? maybe rows3-6? Let's examine output: The 4x4 block appears rows3-6 columns2-5? Let's extract rows3-6 columns2-5: Rows3: col2-5 = R R X X Row4: col2-5 = R R X X Row5: col2-5 = X X G G Row6: col2-5 = X X G G That is a 4x4 block where each quadrant is 2x2 of same color: top-left quadrant (rows3-4, cols2-3) = R R; R R (all R). top-right quadrant (rows3-4, cols4-5) = X X; X X (all X). bottom-left (rows5-6, cols2-3) = X X; X X ( ... [9051 chars truncated]
"A general's standard bears four colored quadrants. As reinforcements arrive, each new regiment forms up beside the last in the same heraldic pattern, but each regiment is twice the size of the one before — a battle line growing ever more massive toward the enemy."
120b: k=1
See: A tiny four-colored standard stands alone on a dark battlefield.
Do: Each wave of reinforcements doubles in number and forms the same quadrant pattern, assembling immediately to the right of the previous formation, vertically centered on the standard.
Grid: The battlefield remains dark. Formations extend rightward only, each dwarfing the last but repeating the same four-color arrangement.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x14? Actually example input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. Output also 10 rows, 14 columns. Input has a small pattern: a "tiny four-colored standard" stands alone on dark battlefield. In input, there is a 2x2 block? Let's view input coordinates: rows 0-9, columns 0-13. Given input lines (I'll index rows 0-9): Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: all . Row4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Rows6-9 all . So there is a 2x2 pattern at rows4-5, cols0-1: R X on row4, X G on row5. That's a "standard": maybe a flag with colors R, X, G? Actually four colors: R, X, G, and maybe something else? The pattern is like a 2x2 with R top-left, X top-right, X bottom-left, G bottom-right. That's not four distinct colors; only three. But maybe the "tiny four-colored standard" includes also the background? Not sure. Output shows many repetitions to the right, forming quadrants pattern. Let's examine output rows (10x14). I'll write them: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . R R R R X X X X Row2: . . . . . . R R R R X X X X Row3: . . R R X X R R R R X X X X Row4: R X R R X X R R R R X X X X Row5: X G X X G G X X X X G G G G Row6: . . X X G G X X X X G G G G Row7: . . . . . . X X X X G G G G Row8: . . . . . . X X X X G G G G Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . We see pattern expanding to right, centered vertically on the original standard (rows4-5). The pattern seems to be a 4x4 quadrant repeated? Let's try to see the base pattern maybe 4x4 block: Look at rows3-6 and cols2-5 maybe? Let's extract a 4x4 region that repeats. From output, columns 0-13. The pattern seems to have a 4x4 tile: maybe: Tile: Row0? Not sure. Let's look at region columns 0-3 rows0-3? Actually the pattern appears only from column2 onward? Row1 has R R R R starting at col6? Wait row1: columns? Let's index columns 0-13. Row1: positions 0-5 are '.'; col6-9 are R; col10-13 are X. So pattern width 8? Row2 same. Row3: col0 '.'; col1 '.'; col2-3 R R; col4-5 X X; col6-9 R R R R; col10-13 X X X X. Row4: col0 R; col1 X; col2-3 R R; col4-5 X X; col6-9 R R R R; col10-13 X X X X. Row5: col0 X; col1 G; col2 X; col3 X; col4 G; col5 G; col6-9 X X X X; col10-13 G G G G. Row6: col0 '.'; col1 '.'; col2 X; col3 X; col4 G; col5 G; col6-9 X X X X; col10-13 G G G G. Row7: col0-5 '.'; col6-9 X X X X; col10-13 G G G G. Row8 same as row7. So pattern seems to be a 2x2 original (R X / X G) then each "wave" doubles in number and forms same quadrant pattern, assembling immediately to the right of previous formation, vertically centered on the standard. Interpretation: Starting with original 2x2 block at leftmost (col0-1 rows4-5). Then we create a larger block to its right, double size (i.e., 4x4) replicating the same pattern arrangement (maybe like a fractal). Then next wave double again (8x8) but limited by grid width. The output shows a 4x4 block starting at col2? Let's see: columns 2-5 rows3-6 maybe correspond to ... [9643 chars truncated]
"Four spotlight colors illuminate a tiny stage. The director calls for an encore — the same scene replayed on a stage twice as large, then twice again, each restaging extending the theater complex further into the wings while keeping the same color blocking."
120b: k=1
See: Four colored spotlights mark a small square stage in surrounding darkness.
Do: Each encore doubles the stage dimensions and is built immediately to the right of the last, preserving the four-color spotlight arrangement, centered on the original stage's height.
Grid: Darkness surrounds all stages. The sequence of stages extends rightward, growing symmetrically above and below the original.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x14? Actually example input shows 10 rows, 14 columns. Output also 10 rows, 14 columns. Input has a small 2x2 pattern? Let's view input: rows 0-3 all dots. Row4: "R X . . . . . . . . . . . .". Row5: "X G . . . . . . . . . . . .". So a 2x2 block at leftmost columns: positions (4,0)=R, (4,1)=X, (5,0)=X, (5,1)=G. That's like a stage with four colors: R top-left, X top-right, X bottom-left, G bottom-right? Actually bottom-left is X, bottom-right G. Output shows larger pattern extending rightwards, replicating and scaling. Let's examine output rows (10x14). Row0 all dots. Row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X". So row1 columns 6-9 R, 10-13 X. Row2 same as row1. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G". Row8 same as row7. Row9 all dots. So pattern appears to be successive "encores" doubling stage dimensions each time, placed to the right, centered vertically on original stage's height. Original stage is 2x2 at rows 4-5, cols 0-1. Height 2. Center vertical line? The output shows original stage remains at leftmost? Actually output rows 4-5 columns 0-1 still have original: row4 col0 R, col1 X; row5 col0 X, col1 G. Yes unchanged. Then to the right, we have larger stages: first encore maybe size 4x4? Let's see region columns 2-5? Actually output shows at columns 2-5 rows 3-6 maybe? Let's map. Let's index columns 0-13. Original stage at cols0-1 rows4-5. Next stage (first encore) appears to be 4x4 block placed immediately to the right (starting col2) and centered vertically on original stage's height (original height 2, center line between rows4-5?). For a 4x4 block, vertical centering would place its rows 3-6 (since original rows 4-5 are middle two rows). Indeed rows3-6 columns2-5 contain pattern: Let's extract rows3-6 cols2-5: Row3 col2 R,3 R,4 X,5 X => "R R X X" Row4 col2 R,3 R,4 X,5 X => "R R X X" Row5 col2 X,3 X,4 G,5 G => "X X G G" Row6 col2 X,3 X,4 G,5 G => "X X G G" That matches a scaled version of original: original pattern: R X X G Scaled by factor 2 (each cell becomes 2x2 block). Indeed R becomes 2x2 of R, X becomes 2x2 of X, G becomes 2x2 of G. The arrangement: top-left R block, top-right X block, bottom-left X block, bottom-right G block. Yes. Next encore: size 8x8 placed to the right of that, starting col6? Actually columns6-13 (8 columns) rows? Should be centered vertically on original height (2) => rows? For 8 height, center would be rows? Original rows 4-5 are middle. For height 8, rows would be from 0? Let's see output rows0-9. The 8x8 block appears rows0-9? Actually output rows0-9 (10 rows) but 8 height cannot exceed grid height. Let's examine columns6-13 rows0-9: pattern appears: rows0-1 all dots? Row0 col6-13 are dots. Row1 col6-9 R, col10-13 X. Row2 same. Row3 col6-9 R, col10-13 X. Row4 col6-9 R, col10-13 X. Row5 col6-9 X, col1 ... [9776 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants four varieties in a tiny square plot, then cultivates a plot twice as large with the same layout beside it, then one twice as large again — a geometric garden expanding along a single garden wall."
120b: fail
See: Four colored plants sit in a small square bed on dark soil.
Do: Each successive bed doubles in size and is planted immediately beside the previous one in the same four-quadrant arrangement, centered on the original bed's row.
Grid: The soil stays dark. Beds extend in one direction from the original plot, each vertically centered on the first planting.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Four colored plants sit in a small square bed on dark soil. Each successive bed doubles in size and is planted immediately beside the previous one in the same four-quadrant arrangement, centered on the original bed's row. The soil stays dark. Beds extend in one direction from the original plot, each vertically centered on the first planting." Interpretation: Input contains a small 2x2 block? Actually examples: Input shows a small cluster of colored cells in top-left? Let's examine Example1 input: grid 10x14? Actually 10 rows, 14 columns. Input has R at (row5,col1) (0-index?). Let's index rows starting 0. Row4 (0-index) has "R X . . ..." So R at col0, X at col1. Row5 has "X G . . ..." So X at col0, G at col1. So a 2x2 block of colors: top-left: R (red), top-right: X (grey), bottom-left: X, bottom-right: G (green). That's four colored cells forming a 2x2 square. Output is larger grid 10x14 same size? Output shows pattern extended to right and down? Let's view output rows: Row0 all dots. Row1: ". . . . . . R R R R X X X X". So row1 has 4 Rs then 4 Xs starting at col6? Actually columns 6-9 Rs, 10-13 Xs. Row2 same as row1. Row3: ". . R R X X R R R R X X X X". Row4: "R X R R X X R R R R X X X X". Row5: "X G X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row6: ". . X X G G X X X X G G G G". Row7: ". . . . . . X X X X G G G G". Row8 similar. Row9 all dots. So pattern appears to be a fractal-like expansion: original 2x2 block is placed, then successive "beds" double size and placed to the right? Actually description: each successive bed doubles in size and is planted immediately beside the previous one in the same four-quadrant arrangement, centered on the original bed's row. So we start with original 2x2 block (size 2). Next bed size 4? Actually double size => 4x4? It is placed immediately beside previous one (to the right?) in same four-quadrant arrangement (i.e., same relative positions of colors within the block). Centered on original bed's row (vertical alignment). So we get a 4x4 block adjacent to the right of original, sharing same row center. In output, we see a 4x4 block of pattern to the right of original? Let's locate original block coordinates: In input, rows 4-5, cols0-1. In output, those same cells appear? Row4 col0 is R (same), col1 X (same). Row5 col0 X, col1 G. So original unchanged. Now to the right, there is a 4x4 block starting at col2? Let's see row4 col2-5: "R R X X". Row5 col2-5: "X X G G". Row6 col2-5: "X X G G". Row7 col2-5: "X X G G". That's a 4x4 block? Actually rows4-7, cols2-5. That's 4 rows, 4 cols. It seems to be a scaled version of original? Let's compare: original 2x2 pattern: R X X G If we double each dimension (scale factor 2), we would get 4x4 where each original cell becomes 2x2 block of same color. That would be: R R X X R R X X X X G G X X G G But the observed block rows4-7 cols2-5 is: Row4: R R X X (matches top two rows of scaled) Row5: X X G G (but expected row5 to be R R X X? Wait sc ... [10513 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains cells of three types: red (R) cells that form a diagonal or irregular boundary/separator line, a dominant non-red color (blue, grey, azure, or maroon depending on the puzzle instance) scattered throughout the grid on both sides of the red boundary, and black/empty (.) cells also scattered on both sides. The red cells divide each column into an 'above' region and a 'below' region.
Do: 1. Identify all red (R) cells in the grid. These remain fixed in place throughout the transformation. 2. Identify the non-red, non-black color present in the grid (e.g., blue, grey, azure, maroon) — this is the fill color. 3. For each column independently, find the red cell(s). Every non-red cell ABOVE the topmost red cell in that column becomes black (.). Every non-red cell BELOW the bottommost red cell in that column becomes the fill color. 4. Red cells stay exactly where they are. The result is that the region above the red boundary is cleared to empty/black, the red boundary is preserved, and the region below the red boundary is filled solid with the fill color.
Grid: The grid is square (10x10 in all examples). It uses a black (.) background with exactly two other colors: red (R) serving as a fixed boundary, and one other color serving as fill material. The red cells form a connected or near-connected band that spans the full width of the grid, separating it into an upper and lower region.
"A dam holds back a flood that fills everything below it."
120b: k=2
See: A red dam stretches across the landscape, sometimes straight, sometimes staggered like a staircase. Above and below the dam, colored sediment and empty air pockets are scattered randomly — the remnants of a world before the flood.
Do: When the floodwaters rise, the dam holds firm. Everything above the dam is swept clean — scoured to empty sky. Everything below the dam is submerged: the water fills every pocket, every gap, drowning the space in a uniform layer of sediment. The dam itself, red and unyielding, stays exactly where it was built.
Grid: The world is a 10×10 valley. The red dam cuts across it column by column, and the colored sediment is the same substance everywhere — it just needs the flood to press it into place. Above: clear sky. Below: solid earth. The dam: immovable.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: red dam across landscape, sometimes straight, sometimes staggered like a staircase. Above dam: clear sky (empty). Below dam: solid earth (filled). The dam stays same. So transformation: For each column, there is a red row (R) that forms a dam across columns, maybe not same row each column? In examples, we see input grid 10x10. In example1, there is a row of R's across entire row 4 (0-index? Actually row index 3 if starting 0). Input shows row 4 (line 4) is "R R R R R R R R R R". That's the dam. Above rows have various colors (B, .). Below rows have B and . etc. Output: rows above dam become all '.' (black). Rows below dam become all B (blue) (the color of sediment). The dam row stays R. But note: In example1, below dam rows originally had mixture of B and .; after transformation they become all B. So the sediment color is B (blue). The rule: fill all cells below the dam with the most common non-R color? Actually in example1, the only other color present is B (blue). So fill with B. In example2, input has a row of R's but not a full row? Let's examine example2 input: lines: 1: X X X . X . . . X X 2: X . . X X . X . X X 3: . X X . X X . X . . 4: R . X X R . X . R X 5: X R . R . R . R . R 6: . . R X X X R . X . 7: X X . . . X X X X X 8: . X . X X . X . X X 9: . X X . X . X . X X 10: X X . . X X X X X X We see a "dam" of R's but not a straight line: row4 has R at columns 1,5,9? Actually row4: "R . X X R . X . R X" => R at col1, col5, col9 (1-index). Row5: "X R . R . R . R . R" => R at col2,4,6,8,10. Row6: ". . R X X X R . X ." => R at col3,7. So the dam is like a staircase shape: a contiguous path of R's that goes downwards? The description says dam cuts across column by column. So each column has exactly one R cell? Let's check columns: column1: rows: X, X, ., R, X, ., X, ., ., X => R at row4 only. column2: X, ., X, ., R, ., X, X, X, X => R at row5 only. column3: X, ., X, X, ., R, ., ., X, . => R at row6 only. column4: ., X, ., X, R, X, ., X, ., . => R at row5? Wait column4 row5 is R, row4 is X, row6 is X. So R at row5. column5: X, X, X, R, ., X, ., X, X, X => R at row4. column6: ., ., X, ., R, X, X, ., ., X => R at row5. column7: ., X, ., X, ., R, X, X, X, . => R at row6. column8: ., ., X, ., R, ., X, ., ., X => R at row5. column9: X, X, ., R, ., R, X, X, X, . => R at row4 and row6? Actually row4 col9 is R, row6 col9 is R. That's two R's in same column, which violates one per column. Let's double-check: row6 is ". . R X X X R . X ." => col9 is X, not R. So only row4 col9 is R. column10: X, X, ., X, R, ., X, X, X, X => R at row5. Thus each column has exactly one R, forming a diagonal staircase from top-left to bottom-right? Let's list rows of R per column (1-indexed): col1: row4 col2: row5 col3: row6 col4: row5 col5: row4 col6: row5 col7: row6 col8: row5 col9: row4 col10: row5 So pattern: rows vary but each column has exactly one R. The dam is a set of ... [9078 chars truncated]
"A membrane separates living tissue from decay — below it, cells multiply to fill every gap; above it, necrosis claims all."
120b: k=2
See: A red membrane stretches across the organism. Scattered cells of one color inhabit both sides, mixed with empty voids.
Do: The membrane holds firm. Everything above it dies and goes dark. Everything below it regenerates into solid, healthy tissue of the dominant cell type.
Grid: 10x10. Black (.) background, red (R) cells forming a boundary band, and one other color scattered throughout.
We need to infer rule. From description: red membrane across organism (a row of R across). Everything above it dies and goes dark (becomes .). Everything below it regenerates into solid, healthy tissue of the dominant cell type. In examples, there is a full row of R across (horizontal). Input grid 10x10. In Example1, row 4 (0-index? Let's see). Input rows: Row0: B . B B B B B B B . Row1: . . B . B B . B . B Row2: B B . . B B B B B . Row3: R R R R R R R R R R <-- red membrane Row4: . . B B . . . . . . Row5: B B . B . . . . B . Row6: . B B B . B B . B . Row7: B B . . . B . . B . Row8: . . B . . . B B . . Row9: . B B B . B B . . B Output rows: first three rows all . (black). Row3 unchanged R row. Rows4-9 become all B (blue). Indeed below membrane, fill with dominant cell type among cells below? In input below row3, there are many B and some . . The dominant color is B (blue). So fill entire rows 4-9 with B. Also rows above become all . (black). So rule: find the row of all R (full red line). Everything above set to . (black). Everything below set to the most frequent non- . color present in the region below (including maybe above? but likely below). In Example2, let's verify. Example2 input rows: Row0: X X X . X . . . X X Row1: X . . X X . X . X X Row2: . X X . X X . X . . Row3: R . X X R . X . R X Row4: X R . R . R . R . R Row5: . . R X X X R . X . Row6: X X . . . X X X X X Row7: . X . X X . X . X X Row8: . X X . X . X . X X Row9: X X . . X X X X X X We need to locate full red row? Row3 is not full R; it's mixed. Row4 also mixed. Row5 also mixed. Actually there is no full row of R. Wait maybe the "membrane" is a column? But description says stretches across organism, could be vertical? Let's examine output. Output rows: Row0-2 all . (black). Row3: R . . . R . . . R . (positions of R kept? Input row3 had R at col0, col4, col8? Actually input row3: R . X X R . X . R X. So R at col0, col4, col8. Output row3: R . . . R . . . R . (R kept, others .). Row4: X R . R X R . R X R (looks like input row4: X R . R . R . R . R. Output changed some . to X? Actually input row4 had X at col0, R at1, . at2, R at3, . at4, R at5, . at6, R at7, . at8, R at9. Output row4: X R . R X R . R X R. So col0 X unchanged, col1 R unchanged, col2 . stays ., col3 R unchanged, col4 changed from . to X, col5 R unchanged, col6 . stays ., col7 R unchanged, col8 changed from . to X, col9 R unchanged. So the . cells below membrane become filled with dominant color? Let's see. Row5 output: X X R X X X R X X X. Input row5: . . R X X X R . X . . Wait row5 input: ". . R X X X R . X ." Actually row5 length 10: positions:0 .,1 .,2 R,3 X,4 X,5 X,6 R,7 .,8 X,9 . . Output row5: X X R X X X R X X X. So . at 0,1,7,9 become X. So below membrane, fill with dominant color X (grey). Indeed below rows (4-9) have many X and some R. Dominant is X. So they fill all . with X? But also they keep existing X and R unchanged. So rule: above membrane rows become all . (black). Below membrane rows ... [5535 chars truncated]
"A red accretion ring glows around the singularity — matter below the ring compresses into a solid disk, while above it the void swallows everything into darkness."
120b: fail
See: A red ring of energy spans the field. Particles of one color are scattered above and below, mixed with dark void.
Do: The red ring is immovable. Above it, all matter vanishes into the void. Below it, matter accretes until the disk is completely solid.
Grid: 10x10 space field. Red (R) is the accretion ring. One color is matter. Black (.) is void.
We need to infer rule. From description: red ring immovable, above it all matter vanishes into void (becomes .), below it matter accretes until disk completely solid (fills with the matter color?). In examples, red row is horizontal line across entire grid (row of R). In Example1 input: red row at row index 3 (0-based). Above rows have various B and .; below rows have mixture of B and . etc. Output: rows above red become all . (void). Row of red unchanged. Rows below become all B (the "matter" color). Indeed matter color is B (blue). So rule: Identify the row (or column?) of R that spans entire width (continuous line). That is the "ring". Everything above that line becomes .; everything below becomes filled with the dominant non-void color? In example1, below rows become all B, which is the color that appears in input below (mostly B). In example2, red pattern is not a full row? Let's examine. Input example2: grid 10x10. Row3 (0-index) is "R . X X R . X . R X". Not full red. Row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". Row5: ". . R X X X R . X .". So red not spanning entire row. But maybe the "ring" is a vertical column? Let's see column? Look at column indices where R appears: many. But maybe the "ring" is a diagonal? Hmm. But output example2: rows above some line become .; rows below become X (grey) except the red row unchanged? Let's see output rows: first three rows all . (rows0-2). Row3 output: "R . . . R . . . R .". So red positions remain R, others become .? Actually row3 originally had R . X X R . X . R X. Output row3: R . . . R . . . R . So X's turned to .; R kept. Row4 output: "X R . R X R . R X R". Original row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". So the '.' positions turned to X? Wait original row4 had '.' at col4 and col8? Actually row4: positions: 0 X,1 R,2 .,3 R,4 .,5 R,6 .,7 R,8 .,9 R. Output row4: X R . R X R . R X R. So '.' became X at col2? No col2 was '.' stays '.'; col4 '.' became X; col6 '.' stays '.'; col8 '.' became X. So pattern: maybe below the red ring, fill with X (matter color) except keep existing R? Let's see rows5-9 output all X rows (full X). Input rows5-9 have mixture of X, R, etc. Output rows5-9 are all X (full). So rule: identify the "ring" of R that is a contiguous line (maybe the topmost row that contains any R? Actually row3 has R at columns 0,4,8. Not full. But maybe the "ring" is the first row that contains at least one R? In example1, first row with R is row3 (full). In example2, first row with R is row3 as well. So that row is considered the red ring. Then above rows become all . (void). The red row: keep R where they were, turn other colors to .? In example1, red row is all R already, so unchanged. In example2, red row had X at other positions, turned to . (void). So yes. Below the red row: fill with the "matter" color, which is the most common non-void, non-red color present in the input? In example1, below rows had B and .; B is the matter color. Output rows below become all B. In example2, below rows have X and R and .; X is ... [3659 chars truncated]
"A red thermocline divides the water column — below it the depths are thick with brine, while above it the water clarifies to transparency."
120b: k=2
See: A red thermocline layer stretches across the water column. Colored particles and clear water are mixed above and below.
Do: The thermocline remains fixed. Water above it clears to transparency. Water below it saturates fully with the colored brine.
Grid: 10x10 water column. Red (R) is the thermocline. One color is brine. Black (.) is clear water.
We need to infer rule. From description: red thermocline layer across water column. In examples, red row is fixed. Above becomes clear (.) and below becomes filled with the other color (the brine). In example1 input: grid 10x10. There is a row of R across entire row (row index 3? Let's see). Input rows: row0: B . B B B B B B B . ; row1: . . B . B B . B . B ; row2: B B . . B B B B B . ; row3: R R R R R R R R R R ; row4: . . B B . . . . . . ; row5: B B . B . . . . B . ; row6: . B B B . B B . B . ; row7: B B . . . B . . B . ; row8: . . B . . . B B . . ; row9: . B B B . B B . . B Output: rows0-2 become all . (clear). Row3 unchanged (R). Rows4-9 become all B (the other color). Indeed the brine color is the most common non-red color? In input, colors besides R are B and . . The brine appears to be B (blue). So rule: find the row of all R (thermocline). Everything above that row becomes . (clear). Everything below becomes filled with the most frequent non-R color present in the grid? In example1, B is the only other color besides .; but . also present above. But below rows become B, not . So choose the color that appears most below? Let's examine example2. Example2 input: many X (grey) and R. Row3: "R . X X R . X . R X" Wait row index 3? Let's list rows: 0: X X X . X . . . X X 1: X . . X X . X . X X 2: . X X . X X . X . . 3: R . X X R . X . R X 4: X R . R . R . R . R 5: . . R X X X R . X . 6: X X . . . X X X X X 7: . X . X X . X . X X 8: . X X . X . X . X X 9: X X . . X X X X X X Output rows0-2 become all . (clear). Row3 unchanged? Output row3: "R . . . R . . . R ." Indeed R positions remain R, other cells become . (clear). Row4 becomes "X R . R X R . R X R": So below thermocline, the non-R cells become X (the brine color). Row5: "X X R X X X R X X X": all X except R. Row6-9 all X. Thus brine color is X (grey). In input, besides R, there are X and . . The most common non-R color is X. So rule: fill below with the most frequent non-R color (excluding . maybe). In example1, B is most frequent non-R (blue). In example2, X is most frequent non-R (grey). Also above becomes . regardless of original colors. Also note that in rows below, the R cells stay R (thermocline only one row). In example2, there are R also below? Actually there are R in rows 4-5 etc. In output, those R remain R (they are part of brine? Wait row4 output: X R . R X R . R X R includes R at positions where input had R. So rule: keep R cells unchanged everywhere (thermocline row and any other R?). But description says thermocline is a red layer across water column (full row). In examples, there are R also elsewhere (like row4 column1 etc). Those remain R. So rule: preserve R cells; above thermocline row, set all non-R cells to .; below thermocline row, set all non-R cells to the dominant non-R color (most frequent color other than R and . maybe). Also keep . above? Actually above becomes . anyway, so . stays .. Now need to apply to test input. Test input grid 10x10: Let's index rows ... [6846 chars truncated]
"A red semiconductor junction gates the current — charge accumulates below it until every cell is saturated, while above it the circuit is drained to zero."
120b: k=2
See: A red junction band spans the circuit board. Charge of one color is scattered on both sides, with dead cells in between.
Do: The junction stays fixed. Cells above the junction discharge to zero. Cells below the junction fill to maximum charge.
Grid: 10x10 circuit grid. Red (R) is the junction. One color is charge. Black (.) is zero state.
We need to understand puzzle. From description: red junction band spans the circuit board. Charge of one color is scattered on both sides, with dead cells in between. What to do: junction stays fixed. Cells above the junction discharge to zero. Cells below the junction fill to maximum charge. Interpretation: Input grid contains a horizontal line of R (red) across entire row (junction). Above that row, there are cells of some other color (the "charge") scattered among other colors (including black .). The rule: For rows above the R row, set all cells to black (.) regardless of original? In examples, output rows above R become all '.'. Check Example1: Input rows 0-2 above R row (row index 3). Output rows 0-2 are all '.' indeed. Row 3 (R row) unchanged. Rows below (rows 4-9) become all B (blue) which is the "charge" color? In input, below R there were various colors: B and . etc. The "charge" color appears to be B (blue). Indeed after transformation, all cells below become B (the maximum charge). So rule: Identify the color that appears below the R row (maybe the most frequent non-'.' color?) In Example1, below rows contain B and . only. The charge color is B. Output fills all below rows with B. Example2: Input rows 0-2 above R row (row index 3). Output rows 0-2 become all '.' (black). Row 3 (R row) unchanged (R . . . R . . . R .). Wait output row 3: "R . . . R . . . R ." matches input row 3? Input row 3: "R . X X R . X . R X". Actually input row 3: "R . X X R . X . R X". Output row 3: "R . . . R . . . R .". So not unchanged: the non-R cells become '.'? Let's examine: In row 3, there are R at columns 0,4,8. Others are X or . . In output, those become '.' (including X become .). So rule: Junction row: keep R cells, set other cells to '.' (zero). So "junction stays fixed" meaning R cells stay, others become zero. Rows below (rows 4-9) become filled with the charge color X (grey) maybe? Let's see output rows 4-9: they are all X except some pattern? Output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R". That's not all X. Wait row4 is the first row below R (index4). Output row4 matches input row4? Input row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". Output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R". So some '.' become X? Actually input row4 had '.' at col4 and col8? Let's list: columns 0-9. Input row4: X R . R . R . R . R. Output row4: X R . R X R . R X R. So '.' turned into X (charge). Also original X remain X. So rule: For rows below R, any cell that is not R becomes charge color (the dominant non-R color present below?). In this example, the charge color is X (grey). Indeed rows below contain X, R, and '.' . The output fills non-R cells with X. Rows 5-9 output all X except R positions remain R? Let's check output row5: "X X R X X X R X X X". Input row5: ". . R X X X R . X .". So '.' become X, X stay X, R stay R. Row6 output: all X. Input row6: "X X . . . X X X X X". So '.' become X. Row7 output all X. Input row7: ". X . X X . X . X X". '.' become X. Row8 output all X. Input row8: ". X X . X . X . ... [8603 chars truncated]
"A river of red fire separates the realms — the underworld below fills with the souls of the gathered dead, while the sky above is emptied into oblivion."
120b: k=3
See: A red river of flame crosses the world. Spirits of one color drift on both sides, with emptiness between them.
Do: The river of fire is eternal and unmoved. Above it, all spirits are annihilated into void. Below it, the dead pack together until the underworld is full.
Grid: 10x10 cosmological map. Red (R) is the fire river. One color is spirits. Black (.) is void.
We need to infer rule. From description: red river of flame crosses world (row of R across). Spirits of one color drift on both sides, with emptiness between them. Above it, all spirits are annihilated into void. Below it, the dead pack together until the underworld is full. Interpretation: Input grid has a horizontal line of R across entire row (maybe multiple rows?). In examples, there is a full row of R across (row index 3 in example1 (0-index?), row 3 of 10). In example2, row 3 also has R's but not full? Let's check example2 input: row 3 (0-index) is "R . X X R . X . R X". Not full. Wait but description says red river crosses world, maybe a vertical? Let's examine outputs: In example1 output, rows above the R row become all '.' (void). Rows below become filled with B (the spirit color). The spirit color is the most frequent non-R color? In example1 input, colors besides R and . are B (blue). Indeed output rows 4-9 (below R) become all B. So rule: Identify the row of R that is full across (maybe the first full row of R). Everything above that row becomes '.'; everything below becomes filled with the dominant other color (spirits). The original positions of other colors above become void; below become filled. Check example2: Input has multiple colors: X (grey), R, etc. Output: rows above the R row become '.'; rows below become filled with X? Let's see output rows 4-9 are filled with X. Indeed output row4 (index 4) is "X R . R X R . R X R" Wait that's not all X. Actually output row4 (0-index) is row index 4? Let's list output example2: Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . 3: R . . . R . . . R . 4: X R . R X R . R X R 5: X X R X X X R X X X 6-9: all X rows. So the R row is row3? In input row3 is "R . X X R . X . R X". That's not full R. But output row3 after transformation: "R . . . R . . . R ." So they kept R positions? Actually they kept R in same columns as original? Let's compare: Input row3 columns with R at positions 0,4,8? Actually row3: indices 0 R, 1 ., 2 X,3 X,4 R,5 .,6 X,7 .,8 R,9 X. Output row3: R . . . R . . . R . So they kept R at same columns (0,4,8) and set other cells to '.' (void). So rule: For the "river" row (the row containing R's), keep R's, set other cells to '.'. Now rows above become all '.' (void). Indeed rows 0-2 become all '.'. Rows below: they become filled with the "spirit" color (X) except where there are R? Let's see row4 output: "X R . R X R . R X R". This row originally (input row4) is "X R . R . R . R . R". Wait input row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". Output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R". So they filled the '.' positions (where there was '.' originally) with X (spirit color). Also kept R positions unchanged. Row5 input: ". . R X X X R . X ." Output row5: "X X R X X X R X X X". So '.' become X, R stay, other colors (X) stay X (already). Row6 input: "X X . . . X X X X X" Output row6: all X (including '.' become X). Row7 input: ". X . X X . X . X X" Output row7: all X. Row8 inpu ... [6182 chars truncated]
"The red ribbon dancers hold their formation across the floor — behind them, the chorus packs in tight filling every mark, while ahead the stage is cleared for their entrance."
120b: k=2
See: Red ribbon dancers form a line across the floor. Other dancers of one color and empty marks are scattered on both sides.
Do: The ribbon dancers freeze in place. The space ahead of them empties completely. The space behind them fills with chorus dancers on every mark.
Grid: 10x10 dance floor. Red (R) is ribbon dancers. One color is chorus. Black (.) is empty marks.
We need to infer rule. From description: Red ribbon dancers form a line across the floor. Other dancers of one color and empty marks are scattered on both sides. The ribbon dancers freeze in place. The space ahead of them empties completely. The space behind them fills with chorus dancers on every mark. Interpretation: Input has a full row of R across? In examples, yes: Example1 input row 4 (0-index?) is all R across. Output: rows above become empty (.) rows below become filled with B (the other color). Indeed output rows 0-2 become all .; row3 remains R; rows4-9 become all B. So rule: Identify the row (or column?) of R that is full line across. Then set all rows above that row to empty (.) and all rows below to the other color (the non-R color that appears elsewhere). In example1, other color is B (blue). In output, rows below become all B. Example2: Input has a row of R? Let's see: Input rows: row0: X X X . X . . . X X (no). row1: X . . X X . X . X X (no). row2: . X X . X X . X . . (no). row3: R . X X R . X . R X (has R at positions 0,4,8 but not full). row4: X R . R . R . R . R (R at 1,3,5,7,9). Not full. row5: . . R X X X R . X . (R at 2,6). row6: X X . . . X X X X X (no). row7: . X . X X . X . X X (no). row8: . X X . X . X . X X (no). row9: X X . . X X X X X X (no). Wait there is no full row of R. But output shows row3 (index?) becomes R . . . R . . . R . (R at positions 0,4,8). So they kept R positions but cleared others? Actually output row3: "R . . . R . . . R ." matches input row3 but with X replaced by .? Input row3: "R . X X R . X . R X". So they turned X to . and kept R. Also rows above become all . (rows0-2). Rows below become filled with X (the other color). Indeed output rows4-9 are all X. So rule: Find the row that contains the most R? Or the "ribbon line" maybe is the row that contains R in a contiguous line? In example2, there is no full line, but maybe the "ribbon dancers" are the R that form a line across the floor meaning they are aligned vertically? Wait maybe it's a column? Let's examine columns: In example2, column? Let's see column0: X, X, ., R, X, ., X, ., ., X => contains R at row3 only. Not full. Column? Not. Maybe the rule: Identify the row that contains the most R (or the median row?) In example1, row3 has 10 R (max). In example2, which row has most R? Count: row0 has 0 R. row1 0. row2 0. row3 has 3 R. row4 has 5 R. row5 has 2 R. row6 0. row7 0. row8 0. row9 0. So row4 has 5 R, more than row3. But output row4? Output row4 is "X R . R X R . R X R" which matches input row4 unchanged? Actually output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R" same as input row4. Wait output row4 is same as input row4 (since input row4: X R . R . R . R . R). Wait there is difference: input row4 had '.' at positions 4 and 8? Let's check: Input row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". Output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R". So they changed '.' at positions 4 and 8 to X (the other color). So they filled missing spots with other color? Hmm. Let's list output rows: ... [7512 chars truncated]
"A red intrusion of magma cuts through the strata — below it, sediment compacts into solid rock, while above it erosion strips everything down to bare void."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A red magma intrusion runs across the rock face. Sediment of one color and voids are distributed on both sides.
Do: The magma intrusion is fixed. Above it, all material erodes away to nothing. Below it, sediment lithifies and fills every pore until the rock is solid.
Grid: 10x10 geological cross-section. Red (R) is the magma intrusion. One color is sediment/rock. Black (.) is void.
"A layer of caramel hardens in the pan — beneath it, the custard sets smooth and even, while steam escapes above leaving the surface bare."
120b: k=2
See: A red caramel ribbon crosses the dish. Crumbs of a colored ingredient are scattered above and below, with empty spaces throughout.
Do: The caramel stays put. Above the caramel, the surface is wiped clean. Below the caramel, the ingredient melts and fills every pocket into a uniform layer.
Grid: 10x10. Red (R) forms the caramel line. One other color is the ingredient. Black (.) is empty space.
We need to understand puzzle. From description: red caramel ribbon crosses the dish (i.e., a horizontal line of red across grid). Crumbs of a colored ingredient are scattered above and below, with empty spaces throughout. The caramel stays put. Above the caramel, the surface is wiped clean. Below the caramel, the ingredient melts and fills every pocket into a uniform layer. Thus: Input grid 10x10. There is a full row of R (red) across somewhere (maybe not full? In examples, row of R is full across). In Example1, row 4 (0-index?) is all R. In Example2, row 4? Let's check Example2 input: row indices 0-9. Row3 (index3) is "R . X X R . X . R X" not full. Wait there is also row4 "X R . R . R . R . R". Actually there is not a full row of R. But maybe the "caramel ribbon" is a vertical line? Let's examine output: In Example2 output, rows 0-2 become all '.' (cleared). Row3 output: "R . . . R . . . R ." So row3 retains R positions but other colors cleared? Row4 output: "X R . R X R . R X R" same as input row4? Let's compare input row4: "X R . R . R . R . R". Output row4: "X R . R X R . R X R". So some changes: positions where there were '.' become X? Actually input row4 col4 (0-index) is '.'; output row4 col4 is X. Also col8 '.' becomes X. So below the caramel (rows after row3) ingredient (X) fills empty spaces (.) to become uniform layer of X? Let's analyze. In Example2, the "ingredient" color is X (grey). The caramel is R (red). The row of R is not full but maybe the "ribbon" is a horizontal line of R that may have gaps? In description: "red caramel ribbon crosses the dish." Could be a line across entire width but maybe with gaps? In Example2, row3 has R at positions 0,4,8 (three Rs). Not full. But maybe the "ribbon" is the set of R cells that form a contiguous line? Actually row3: "R . X X R . X . R X". That's not contiguous. Hmm. Let's examine Example1: Input row3 (index3) is all R. Output rows 0-2 become all '.' (cleared). Row4-9 become all B (the ingredient). So above the R row, everything cleared; below, all B fill. Thus rule: Find the row containing the red line (maybe the first row that is all red? Or the row that is completely filled with R). Then set all rows above to '.' (black). Set all rows below to fill with the other color (the ingredient) everywhere (including where there were '.' originally). Keep the red row unchanged? In Example1 output, the red row unchanged (still all R). Yes. In Example2, there is not a full red row. Let's locate the "ribbon": maybe it's the first row that contains at least one R and no other colors? But row3 contains X as well. So not. Maybe the ribbon is the row where R appears in a contiguous block across the row? Let's examine row3: pattern: R . X X R . X . R X. Not contiguous. Maybe the ribbon is the row where the number of R equals number of other colors? Not. Let's think: In Example2 output, rows 0-2 cleared to '.' (same as Example1). Row3 output retains R positions but other cells become '.' (cleared ... [5445 chars truncated]
"A sustained red chord rings out across the staff — below it, the orchestra swells to fill every beat, while above it the notes fade into silence."
120b: fail
See: Red notes form a held chord spanning the width of the score. Other colored notes are scattered above and below this chord, interspersed with rests.
Do: The red chord is sustained unchanged. Every beat above the chord becomes a rest. Every beat below the chord is filled with the orchestra's color.
Grid: 10x10 score grid. Red (R) is the sustained chord. One color is the orchestral fill. Black (.) is silence.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: "Red notes form a held chord spanning the width of the score. Other colored notes are scattered above and below this chord, interspersed with rests. What to do: The red chord is sustained unchanged. Every beat above the chord becomes a rest. Every beat below the chord is filled with the orchestra's color." Interpretation: Input grid 10x10. There is a row of R across entire width (maybe multiple rows?). In example 1, input has a row of R across entire width at row index 3 (0-index?). Output: The rows above that become all '.' (black). The rows below become filled with the "orchestral fill" color, which appears to be B (blue) in example. Indeed, in example input, there are many B scattered above and below. The fill color is the most common non-R, non-., maybe? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (10x10). Let's list rows: Row0: B . B B B B B B B . Row1: . . B . B B . B . B Row2: B B . . B B B B B . Row3: R R R R R R R R R R Row4: . . B B . . . . . . Row5: B B . B . . . . B . Row6: . B B B . B B . B . Row7: B B . . . B . . B . Row8: . . B . . . B B . . Row9: . B B B . B B . . B Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: R R R R R R R R R R Row4: B B B B B B B B B B Row5: B B B B B B B B B B Row6: B B B B B B B B B B Row7: B B B B B B B B B B Row8: B B B B B B B B B B Row9: B B B B B B B B B B So rows above the red row become all '.' (silence). Rows below become all B (blue). So fill color is B. In input, B appears many times. The "orchestra's color" maybe the most frequent non-R, non-., color in the grid. Let's verify: In example, colors present: B, maybe others? Only B appears besides R and . . So fill is B. Now test input: we need to find the row(s) of R spanning width? Let's examine test input rows: Row0: W W W . . . . . . . Row1: W W W . W . . W . . Row2: W . . . W . W . . . Row3: . . W W W . W . . . Row4: . R R R . R R R W R Row5: R R . R R R W R R R Row6: W . . W W W . W W . Row7: . . . . W . W . . W Row8: . W W . . . . W W . Row9: W . W . . W . W . . We need to locate the red chord: "Red notes form a held chord spanning the width of the score." That means there is a row (or maybe multiple rows) where all columns are R? In example, row3 is all R. In test input, we have rows 4 and 5 containing many R but not full width. Row5: "R R . R R R W R R R" has a '.' at column2 (0-index?). Row4: ". R R R . R R R W R" also not full. So maybe the chord is a contiguous block of rows where R appears in each column at least once? Let's examine columns: maybe the chord is a vertical column? But description says spanning the width (i.e., across columns). So maybe the chord is a contiguous set of rows where each column has at least one R across those rows? In example, there is exactly one row of all R. In test, there is not a full row of R. Could be that the chord is the set of rows where R appears in majority? Let's think. Maybe the chord is the lon ... [2555 chars truncated]
"The defensive line holds its ground — behind them the field is packed solid with players, while ahead of them the field is swept clean."
120b: k=1
See: Red defenders form an irregular line across the field. Players of another color are scattered on both sides along with open grass.
Do: The defensive line stays exactly where it is. The side in front of them is cleared to open grass. The side behind them fills up completely with players of the team color.
Grid: 10x10 field. Red (R) is the defensive line. One other color represents players. Black (.) is open field.
We need to infer rule. From description: Red defenders line across field (irregular line). The side in front of them cleared to open grass (black .). The side behind them fills up completely with players of the team color (the other color). In example, red line is row 4 (0-index? Actually input grid 10x10). In example input, row 4 (0-index) is "R R R R R R R R R R". That's a full line of reds across. The other color is B (blue). In output, rows above red become all '.' (black). Indeed rows 0-2 become all '.' (they were originally with B and .). Row 3 is red line unchanged. Rows below become all B (blue) filling entire rows 4-9. Indeed output rows 4-9 are all B. So rule: Identify the row(s) that are entirely red? Or the red line may be irregular line across field (maybe not full row). In test input, red line appears as irregular shape: Let's view test input grid 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9. Row0: "W W W . . . . . . ." Row1: "W W W . W . . W . ." Row2: "W . . . W . W . . ." Row3: ". . W W W . W . . ." Row4: ". R R R . R R R W R" Row5: "R R . R R R W R R R" Row6: "W . . W W W . W W ." Row7: ". . . . W . W . . W" Row8: ". W W . . . . W W ." Row9: "W . W . . W . W . ." We need to find the "defensive line" of red (R). In example, it's a full row of R. Here we have reds in rows 4 and 5, maybe forming a line across? Let's map positions. Row4: columns: 0 '.';1 R;2 R;3 R;4 '.';5 R;6 R;7 R;8 W;9 R Row5: col0 R;1 R;2 '.';3 R;4 R;5 R;6 W;7 R;8 R;9 R So reds occupy many cells, maybe forming a contiguous region? The description: "Red defenders form an irregular line across the field." Could be a connected shape that roughly spans horizontally. The side in front (maybe above?) cleared to '.'; side behind (maybe below?) filled with other color (the other color present in grid besides red and .). In example, other color is B. In test input, other colors present: W (maroon) appears many times. Also maybe other colors? Only W and maybe others? Let's list colors: W, ., R. No other colors. So the "team color" other than red is W. So we will fill the side behind red with W. Need to decide orientation: In example, red line row 3 (0-index) had side in front (above) cleared to '.' and side behind (below) filled with B. So "front" is above (north) and "behind" is below (south). So we need to treat rows above the red line become '.'; rows below become all W. But red line is not a single row; it's irregular across rows 4 and 5. Perhaps we need to find the "topmost" row containing any red? Or treat each column? Let's think: The line may be irregular but still forms a contiguous shape that separates grid into two halves: above and below. The rule may be: For each column, find the red cell(s) that are the "defensive line" (maybe the lowest red in that column? Actually in example, red line occupies entire row, so each column has red at same row. The side in front (above) cleared, side behind (below) filled. So for each column, we could take the red cell(s) that are the "fr ... [7830 chars truncated]
"A warm front creeps across the sky — beneath the front, clouds condense and thicken into a solid overcast, while above it the atmosphere clears to nothing."
120b: k=3
See: A red front line cuts across the sky. Scattered cloud patches of one color appear on both sides, with clear patches between them.
Do: The front holds its position. Skies above the front clear completely. Below the front, clouds fill in every gap until the layer is solid.
Grid: 10x10 sky grid. Red (R) is the weather front. One color is cloud cover. Black (.) is clear sky.
We need to infer rule. From description: red front line cuts across sky. In examples, red row(s) become fixed, above cleared to black (.) and below filled with cloud color (the other color). Let's analyze. Example1 input: 10x10. There is a row of R across entire row (row index 3 zero-based? Actually row4). Input rows: first three rows have B and . etc. Row4 is all R. Below rows have mixture of B and . etc. Output: rows above R become all . (clear). Row of R stays same. Rows below become all B (cloud color). Indeed output rows 5-10 are all B. So rule: Identify the row (or column?) of R that spans entire row? In example1, R row is full of R across. In example2, input: there is a row with R . X X R . X . R X (row4). Not full R. But there is also column? Let's examine. In example2 output: rows above row4 become all . (first three rows). Row4 output: R . . . R . . . R . (preserve R positions, other become .). Row5 output: X R . R X R . R X R (preserve pattern of X and R? Actually row5 input: X R . R . R . R . R. Output row5: X R . R X R . R X R. So some changes: positions where input had . become X? Let's see. Row5 input: X R . R . R . R . R. Output: X R . R X R . R X R. So the '.' at col5 and col9 become X (cloud color). Also row6 input: . . R X X X R . X . ; output: X X R X X X R X X X. So '.' become X, other colors unchanged? Row6 input had '.' at col1,2,8,10 become X. Row7 input: X X . . . X X X X X ; output: X X X X X X X X X X (all X). So '.' become X, other X remain X. Row8 input: . X . X X . X . X X ; output: X X X X X X X X X X (all X). Row9 input: . X X . X . X . X X ; output all X. Row10 input: X X . . X X X X X X ; output all X. Thus rule: Identify the "front line" of R that is a contiguous line (maybe horizontal) that separates top and bottom. Above it, everything becomes clear (.) regardless of original. Below it, everything becomes cloud color (the most frequent non-R color? In ex2, cloud color is X (grey). In ex1, cloud color is B (blue). In ex3, cloud color is A (azure). Indeed each example has a single other color besides R and . (maybe multiple). In ex3 input: colors are A and R and . . Output: above R rows become .; R rows keep R and maybe also A? Let's see ex3: Input rows: row1: . A A . A . A A . . ; row2: R . A A . A . . . A ; row3: R R A . . . . . . . ; row4: . R R . A . . . . . ; row5: A A R R . . . A A . ; row6: A A A R R A . . . . ; row7: . . . . R R A A A . ; row8: A . A . . R R A A A ; row9: A A . . . . R R A . ; row10: . A . A . A A R R A Output rows: row1 all . ; row2 R . . . . . . . . . ; row3 R R . . . . . . . . ; row4 A R R . . . . . . . ; row5 A A R R . . . . . . ; row6 A A A R R . . . . . ; row7 A A A A R R . . . . ; row8 A A A A A R R . . . ; row9 A A A A A A R R . . ; row10 A A A A A A A R R . Observations: The "front line" appears to be the first row containing R? Actually row2 has R at col1, row3 has R at col1-2, row4 has R at col2-3, etc. The front line seems to be a diagonal? But description says "red front ... [7471 chars truncated]
"A red beam bears the load — everything above it is demolished to open air, while below it the walls are filled in solid with brick."
120b: k=2
See: Red structural beams span across the building's cross-section. Bricks of one color and empty spaces are scattered above and below the beams.
Do: The beams remain fixed. All material above the beam is removed, leaving open air. All space below the beam is filled solid with brick.
Grid: 10x10 cross-section. Red (R) is the load-bearing beam. One color is brick. Black (.) is empty space.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: red structural beams span across the building's cross-section. Bricks of one color and empty spaces are scattered above and below the beams. The beams remain fixed. All material above the beam is removed, leaving open air. All space below the beam is filled solid with brick. So we have a grid with a horizontal line of R across entire row (maybe multiple rows?). In examples, the input has a row of R across entire width (10 columns). In Example1, row 4 (0-index?) is all R. In output, rows above become all '.' (empty). Rows below become all B (the brick color). The brick color is the other color present besides R and '.'? In Example1, there are B's (blue) as bricks. Indeed output rows below become all B. So rule: Identify the row(s) of R that span entire width (maybe exactly one row). Keep that row unchanged. For rows above that row, set all cells to '.' (black). For rows below, set all cells to the brick color (the most frequent non-R, non-'.' color? In Example1, there are B's only besides R and '.'; output uses B for all below rows. In Example2, there are X (grey) and maybe other colors? Input includes X and R. Output rows below become X (the brick color). Indeed above rows become '.'; the R row unchanged; below rows become X. Thus algorithm: Find the full-width row of R (i.e., all columns are R). Keep it. For each cell above that row, set to '.' regardless of original. For each cell below, set to the "brick" color, which is the most common non-R, non-'.' color in the input (maybe the color that appears in rows below originally?). In Example2, there are X's and also maybe other colors like '.'? Actually there are '.' as empty spaces. The brick color is X. So we need to determine brick color for test input: there is W (maroon) as brick? Let's examine test input. Test Input grid 10x10: Row0: "W W W . . . . . . ." Row1: "W W W . W . . W . ." Row2: "W . . . W . W . . ." Row3: ". . W W W . W . . ." Row4: ". R R R . R R R W R" Row5: "R R . R R R W R R R" Row6: "W . . W W W . W W ." Row7: ". . . . W . W . . W" Row8: ". W W . . . . W W ." Row9: "W . W . . W . W . ." We need to locate a row of all R across width. Row4: ". R R R . R R R W R" not all R (has '.' and W). Row5: "R R . R R R W R R R" not all R (has '.' and W). No row of all R. Hmm maybe the beam is a vertical column? But description says beams span across building's cross-section, likely horizontal across entire width. In examples, the R row is full of R across all columns. In test input, there is no full R row. Could be that the beam is a column of R spanning entire height? Let's check columns: column0 values: W,W,W,.,.,R,W,.,.,W -> not all R. Column1: W,W,.,.,R,R,.,.,W,. -> not all R. Column2: W,.,.,W,R,.,.,.,W,W? Actually row5 col2 is '.'; not all R. So not column. Maybe the beam is a contiguous region of R that forms a line (maybe not full width) but we treat it as the beam line. In Example1, the beam row is full width, but maybe ... [9501 chars truncated]
"A line of red fortifications divides the battlefield — behind the wall, troops mass into an impenetrable formation, while the no-man's-land beyond is scorched bare."
120b: k=2
See: Red fortifications form a line across the grid. Soldiers of one color are scattered on both sides, with empty ground between them.
Do: The fortifications hold. Everything on the forward side is razed to bare ground. Everything on the sheltered side consolidates into a solid block of troops.
Grid: 10x10 battlefield. Red (R) is fortifications. One color is troops. Black (.) is empty ground.
We need to infer rule. From description: Red line across grid (R row). Soldiers of one color scattered on both sides, empty ground between them. Fortifications hold. Everything on forward side is razed to bare ground (i.e., become .). Everything on sheltered side consolidates into a solid block of troops (i.e., fill with that color). In examples, red line is row of R across entire width (row index?). In Example1 input: row 4 (0-index?) is all R. Above that rows have B and . etc. Below that rows have B and . etc. Output: rows above become all . (empty). Row of R stays same. Rows below become all B (the troop color). Indeed output rows 5-10 are all B. So the "troop color" is the color that appears on both sides of the red line? In example1, above red line there are B and . mixture; below also B and . mixture. The color B appears on both sides. So after transformation, the side "sheltered side" (which side?) consolidates into solid block of troops. Which side is sheltered? In description: "Everything on the forward side is razed to bare ground. Everything on the sheltered side consolidates into a solid block of troops." Need to determine which side is forward vs sheltered. In example1, rows above red line become . (razed). Rows below become B (consolidated). So forward side is above (north) and sheltered side is below (south). In example2, red line is not a full row? Let's examine. Input example2: grid 10x10. Row 4 (0-index?) Actually line: "R . X X R . X . R X" is row 4 (index 3). That's not full R across. Wait there is also column? Let's view grid: maybe red line is column? Let's examine pattern: In example2 output, rows 0-2 become all . (first three rows). Row 3 (index3) becomes "R . . . R . . . R ." (preserves R positions?). Row 4 becomes "X R . R X R . R X R". Row5 "X X R X X X R X X X". Then rows 6-9 become all X. So the red line appears as column? Let's see input rows 3-5 maybe contain R forming vertical line? Let's list input rows with indices: 0: X X X . X . . . X X 1: X . . X X . X . X X 2: . X X . X X . X . . 3: R . X X R . X . R X 4: X R . R . R . R . R 5: . . R X X X R . X . 6: X X . . . X X X X X 7: . X . X X . X . X X 8: . X X . X . X . X X 9: X X . . X X X X X X We need to find a line of R across? Not across rows. Maybe there is a diagonal? Let's see columns: column0 values: X, X, ., R, X, ., X, ., ., X -> not all R. Column1: X, ., X, ., R, ., X, X, X, X -> not. Column2: X, ., X, X, ., R, ., ., X, . -> not. Column3: ., X, ., X, R, X, ., X, ., . -> not. Column4: X, X, X, R, ., X, ., X, X, X -> not. Column5: ., ., X, ., R, X, X, ., ., X -> not. Column6: ., X, ., X, ., R, X, X, X, X -> not. Column7: ., ., X, ., R, ., X, ., ., X -> not. Column8: X, X, ., R, ., X, X, X, X, X -> not. Column9: X, X, ., X, R, ., X, X, X, X -> not. But there is a pattern: rows 3,4,5 have many R's forming maybe a vertical line of R at column? Let's check column0-9 for rows 3-5: Row3: R . X X R . X . R X Row4: X R . R . R . R . ... [11108 chars truncated]
"The red curtain descends — below it the stage fills with performers standing shoulder to shoulder, while above it the rigging loft goes dark."
120b: k=2
See: A red curtain line crosses the stage. Performers of one color and empty spots are scattered throughout the space above and below.
Do: The curtain stays in place. The flies above go completely dark. The stage below fills entirely with the performers' color.
Grid: 10x10 stage cross-section. Red (R) is the curtain line. One color is performers. Black (.) is darkness.
We need to infer rule. From description: red curtain line (R) across stage (horizontal line). Performers of one color and empty spots scattered above and below. Curtain stays. Flies above go completely dark (become .). Stage below fills entirely with performers' color. Interpretation: Input grid 10x10. There is a horizontal line of R across entire row (maybe multiple rows?). In examples, there is a row of R across entire row (row index 3 in example1 (0-index?), row 3). In example2, row 3 also has R at some positions? Let's examine. Example1 input: 10x10. Row0: B . B B B B B B B . ; Row1: . . B . B B . B . B ; Row2: B B . . B B B B B . ; Row3: R R R R R R R R R R (full red line). Row4: . . B B . . . . . . ; Row5: B B . B . . . . B . ; Row6: . B B B . B B . B . ; Row7: B B . . . B . . B . ; Row8: . . B . . . B B . . ; Row9: . B B B . B B . . B Output: rows0-2 become all . (black). Row3 unchanged (R line). Rows4-9 become all B (the performer color). Indeed performer color is B (blue) present above and below? In input, above the red line there are B and . mixture. Below there are B and . mixture. The rule: above the red line, everything becomes . (black). Below the red line, everything becomes the most common non-R color? In example1, below rows have many B and some .; output rows4-9 all B. So performer color is B (blue). So fill entire below region with B. Example2: Input rows: Let's list. Row0: X X X . X . . . X X ; Row1: X . . X X . X . X X ; Row2: . X X . X X . X . . ; Row3: R . X X R . X . R X ; Row4: X R . R . R . R . R ; Row5: . . R X X X R . X . ; Row6: X X . . . X X X X X ; Row7: . X . X X . X . X X ; Row8: . X X . X . X . X X ; Row9: X X . . X X X X X X Observe red line? Row3 has R at positions 0,4,8 maybe not full line. Actually row3: R . X X R . X . R X (R at col0,4,8). Not full line. Row4 also has R at col1,3,5,7,9. So red appears in two rows? The description says "red curtain line crosses the stage". Could be vertical? But in example2, there are multiple rows with R pattern maybe forming a vertical line? Let's examine columns: column0: row0 X, row1 X, row2 ., row3 R, row4 X, row5 ., row6 X, row7 ., row8 ., row9 X. Not all R. So not vertical. Maybe the "curtain line" is the set of R cells that form a contiguous line (maybe diagonal?) In example2, maybe the R cells form a diagonal line? Let's map coordinates (row, col). R positions: row3 col0, col4, col8. row4 col1,3,5,7,9. row5 col2,6. row? row? row? row? row? Actually row5: . . R X X X R . X . => R at col2 and col6. Row6 none? row6 has no R. Row7 none. Row8 none. Row9 none. So R positions form a shape maybe like a "V"? Not a straight line. But output: rows0-2 become all . (black). Row3 becomes "R . . . R . . . R ." (R at same columns as before? Input row3 had R at 0,4,8; output row3 has R at 0,4,8 same, others .). Row4 output: "X R . R X R . R X R" (same as input row4). Row5 output: "X X R X X X R X X X" (input row5 had . . R X X X R . X . ; output changed . to X at col0,1,7,9 ... [9055 chars truncated]
"A red root barrier divides the bed — below it, ground cover spreads until no soil is visible, while above it the earth is raked clean."
120b: k=2
See: A red barrier runs across the garden bed. Patches of one plant color and bare soil are mixed on both sides.
Do: The barrier holds its position. Above the barrier, everything is cleared to bare soil. Below the barrier, the ground cover fills every bare patch until solid.
Grid: 10x10 garden bed. Red (R) is root barrier. One color is ground cover. Black (.) is bare soil.
We need to understand the transformation rule from examples. We have a grid 10x10. Input includes various colors, but the description says: red barrier runs across the garden bed. So red (R) is barrier line across entire row? In examples, there is a full row of R across the grid (horizontal line). Indeed Example1 input: row 4 (0-index?) is "R R R R R R R R R R". That's a full row of R. Example2 input: row 3 is "R . X X R . X . R X" not full row. Wait there is also row 4? Let's examine Example2 input: lines: 1: X X X . X . . . X X 2: X . . X X . X . X X 3: . X X . X X . X . . 4: R . X X R . X . R X 5: X R . R . R . R . R 6: . . R X X X R . X . 7: X X . . . X X X X X 8: . X . X X . X . X X 9: . X X . X . X . X X 10: X X . . X X X X X X Here there is not a full row of R. But there is a column? Let's see column positions: maybe there is a vertical barrier? Let's examine column 1 (index0): rows: X, X, ., R, X, ., X, ., ., X => not all R. Column 3? Not. But description says barrier runs across garden bed. Could be a line of R that is contiguous across either row or column? In Example2, there is a diagonal? Let's see pattern: maybe the barrier is the set of R cells that form a line (maybe not full). In Example2 output, the rows above barrier become all '.' (black). Rows below barrier become filled with the "ground cover" color (which is the most frequent non-R, non-., maybe X?). Let's examine output Example2: rows 1-3 become all '.' (black). Row4 (the barrier row) becomes "R . . . R . . . R .". Wait output row4: "R . . . R . . . R .". So barrier row retains R at positions where R originally? Actually input row4 had R at positions 0,4,8 maybe? Let's check: input row4: "R . X X R . X . R X". So R at col0, col4, col8. Output row4: "R . . . R . . . R .". So R kept, other cells become '.' (cleared). So barrier row retains R but other cells cleared. Rows below barrier (rows 5-10) become filled with X (ground cover) except where there were R originally? Let's see output row5: "X R . R X R . R X R". Input row5: "X R . R . R . R . R". So output row5: at positions where input had R, they stay R. At other positions, they become X (ground cover). Indeed row5 output: col0 X (was X), col1 R (R), col2 . (was .) but output is '.'? Wait output row5 col2 is '.'? Actually output row5: "X R . R X R . R X R". So col2 is '.' (same as input '.'), not X. Hmm rule maybe: fill bare patches (.) with ground cover (X) but keep other colors unchanged? Let's examine row5 input: "X R . R . R . R . R". Output: "X R . R X R . R X R". So '.' at col2 remains '.' (since maybe it's not bare soil? Actually '.' is black = bare soil). The rule says: "Below the barrier, the ground cover fills every bare patch until solid." So fill '.' with ground cover color (which is the most common non-R, non-., maybe X). But in row5, col2 is '.' and output remains '.'? Wait output row5 col2 is '.' indeed. So maybe ground cover only fills '.' that are adjacent to something? Let's examine row6 input: " ... [9574 chars truncated]
See: A 4×4 grid of colored cells. The grid is treated as a single rigid tile that can be rotated.
Do: Create an 8×8 output by tiling four rotated copies of the 4×4 input into a 2×2 arrangement of quadrants: (1) Top-left quadrant: the original input, unchanged. (2) Top-right quadrant: the input rotated 90° counter-clockwise (equivalently, transpose then reverse each column). (3) Bottom-left quadrant: the input rotated 180°. (4) Bottom-right quadrant: the input rotated 90° clockwise (equivalently, transpose then reverse each row).
Grid: The input is always a 4×4 grid. The output is always an 8×8 grid composed of four 4×4 quadrants arranged in a 2×2 layout. There is no background color or border; every cell is determined by the corresponding rotation of the input.
"A compass rose unfurls from a single petal, each cardinal direction revealing a new face of the same bloom."
120b: k=2
See: A small mosaic tile — a 4×4 swatch of stained glass — sits at the heart of a cathedral floor, waiting to be echoed outward.
Do: The tile dreams of itself from every direction. It gazes north and sees its own face. It turns its head east, west, and south, and at each glance the reflection has spun — as if the tile were placed on a lazy Susan and photographed at each quarter-turn. These four portraits are pressed together like pages of a folded map, the original anchoring one corner while its dizzied twins fill the remaining three.
Grid: The cathedral floor is exactly four tiles wide and four tiles tall — a 2×2 arrangement of the original swatch and its three rotated echoes. No grout, no gaps: every cell of colored glass belongs to one of the four spinning memories of the original piece.
We need to infer rule. Input is 4x4, output is 8x8 (since examples output 8x8). The description: original 4x4 tile placed at heart, then rotated copies (90°,180°,270°) placed to form a 2x2 arrangement. Likely output is a 8x8 where quadrants are the original and its rotations. Need to determine arrangement: which quadrant gets which rotation? The description: "original anchoring one corner while its dizzied twins fill the remaining three." So original placed at one corner of 8x8 (maybe top-left) and other three quadrants are rotated versions. Check Example1. Input 4x4 grid: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Let's compute rotations. Original (0°): [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90° clockwise: new[i][j] = original[3-j][i] (size 4). Let's compute. Indices: rows 0-3, cols 0-3. Compute rotated90: row0: original[3][0]=B, [2][0]=Y, [1][0]=A, [0][0]=Y => B Y A Y row1: original[3][1]=B, [2][1]=A, [1][1]=Y, [0][1]=W => B A Y W row2: original[3][2]=B, [2][2]=A, [1][2]=B, [0][2]=B => B A B B row3: original[3][3]=A, [2][3]=B, [1][3]=A, [0][3]=A => A B A A Rotate 180°: rotate 90 twice or reverse both axes. Let's compute: row0 = original[3][3], original[3][2], original[3][1], original[3][0] => A B B B row1: original[2][3], [2][2], [2][1], [2][0] => B A A Y row2: original[1][3], [1][2], [1][1], [1][0] => A B Y A row3: original[0][3], [0][2], [0][1], [0][0] => A B W Y Rotate 270° clockwise (or 90° ccw): row0 = original[0][3], [1][3], [2][3], [3][3] => A A B A row1 = original[0][2], [1][2], [2][2], [3][2] => B B A B row2 = original[0][1], [1][1], [2][1], [3][1] => W Y A B row3 = original[0][0], [1][0], [2][0], [3][0] => Y A Y B Now output 8x8 given. Let's layout output rows: Row1: Y W B A A A B A Row2: A Y B A B B A B Row3: Y A A B W Y A B Row4: B B B A Y A Y B Row5: A B B B B Y A Y Row6: B A A Y B A Y W Row7: A B Y A B A B B Row8: A B W Y A B A A We need to see quadrants 4x4 each. Top-left quadrant (rows1-4, cols1-4) = original? Let's extract: Rows1-4, Col1-4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Yes matches original. Good. Top-right quadrant (rows1-4, cols5-8): Rows1: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B That appears to be rotation? Compare with 90°? Our 90° rotation matrix was: B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A B A A Not match. 180° rotation matrix: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y Not match. 270° rotation matrix: A A B A B B A B W Y A B Y A Y B Yes top-right matches 270° rotation (clockwise). Good. Bottom-left quadrant (rows5-8, cols1-4): Rows5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y That matches 180° rotation? Let's compare 180° matrix we computed: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y Exactly matches. Good. Bottom-right quadrant (rows5-8, cols5-8): Rows5: B Y A Y Row6: B A Y W Row7: B A B B Row8: A B A A That matches 90° rotation matrix? 90 ... [4882 chars truncated]
"A cell undergoes mitotic division, but each daughter inherits the mother's memory at a different angle of the spindle—four offspring, four orientations, one genome."
120b: k=1
See: A small tissue sample of colored cells, a living mosaic waiting to replicate.
Do: The organism divides into four daughter colonies, each carrying the same genetic pattern but rotated on its axis as though the spindle apparatus turned each copy before planting it in its quadrant of the petri dish.
Grid: The original tissue sits in one corner. Three sibling colonies fill the remaining corners, each a rotated echo of the first, assembling into a larger organism exactly twice the width and twice the height.
We need to infer rule: Input is a small grid, output is larger (twice width and height). The description: original tissue sits in one corner, three sibling colonies fill remaining corners, each a rotated echo of the first, assembling into larger organism exactly twice width and twice height. Thus output is 2x2 tiling of the input, but each tile is rotated differently: maybe original in top-left, then rotated 90°, 180°, 270° in other quadrants. Check example 1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: given lines: Y W B A (4) A Y B A (4) Y A A B (4) B B B A (4) So 4x4 input. Output grid size? Provided lines: let's count rows: appears 8 rows, each 8 columns. Yes 8x8. Now we need to see arrangement. Let's label input matrix I (4x4). We'll compute rotations. Define: I0 = original (no rotation) I90 = rotate 90 degrees clockwise? Or maybe 90 anticlockwise. Need to see. Quadrants: top-left (rows 0-3, cols0-3) should be I0? Let's check output top-left 4x4 region. Output rows first 4, cols first 4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A That matches exactly input. So top-left is original. Now top-right quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7). Let's extract from output. Row1 cols5-8: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B So 4x4 block: [ [A A B A], [B B A B], [W Y A B], [Y A Y B] ] Is this a rotation of input? Let's compute input rotated 90 clockwise: Input matrix: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A Rotate 90 cw => new row i = column from bottom to top. Let's compute: col0 (Y, A, Y, B) becomes row0 reversed? Actually 90 cw: element (r,c) -> (c, N-1-r). So resulting matrix: Row0: B? Wait compute: For each new row r (0..3), new col c (0..3) = original[N-1-c][r]. Let's just compute manually: Write original: [0,0]=Y, [0,1]=W, [0,2]=B, [0,3]=A [1,0]=A, [1,1]=Y, [1,2]=B, [1,3]=A [2,0]=Y, [2,1]=A, [2,2]=A, [2,3]=B [3,0]=B, [3,1]=B, [3,2]=B, [3,3]=A Rotate 90 cw => new matrix: Row0: [3,0]=B, [2,0]=Y, [1,0]=A, [0,0]=Y => B Y A Y Row1: [3,1]=B, [2,1]=A, [1,1]=Y, [0,1]=W => B A Y W Row2: [3,2]=B, [2,2]=A, [1,2]=B, [0,2]=B => B A B B Row3: [3,3]=A, [2,3]=B, [1,3]=A, [0,3]=A => A B A A So 90 cw matrix: B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A B A A Does that match top-right? Not exactly. Top-right we have: A A B A B B A B W Y A B Y A Y B That looks like maybe 90 ccw? Let's compute 90 ccw (or 270 cw). 90 ccw: new row r = original[c][N-1-r]? Let's compute quickly: Equivalent to rotate 90 cw three times. Let's compute 90 ccw matrix: Take original, rotate left: Row0 becomes column from rightmost to leftmost? Actually 90 ccw: new row0 = column from rightmost to leftmost? Let's compute: new matrix element (r,c) = original[c][N-1-r]? Wait that's cw? Let's just compute manually: 90 ccw of original: take original and rotate left. We can compute by transposing then reversing rows. Original: Y W B A A Y B A Y A A B B B B A Transpose: Y A Y B W Y A B B B A B A A B A Now reverse each row (since ... [7979 chars truncated]
"A nebula's core image is captured by four telescopes orbiting at different angles—each returns the same stellar nursery rotated by its orbital position, and the composite is stitched into one grand mosaic."
120b: k=1
See: A small square field of colored stars and gas clouds—a single telescope's capture.
Do: Combine four exposures into one mosaic. Each exposure shows the same patch of sky but rotated according to the telescope's orbital attitude, so the nebula appears to pinwheel across the composite.
Grid: The final mosaic is twice the dimensions of a single exposure, tiled 2×2. Each tile is the same stellar field at a different rotational angle.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is 4x4, output is 8x8. So tile 2x2 each being rotated version of input? Let's examine. Input grid (4x4): Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Output 8x8 given. Let's write output rows: 1: Y W B A A A B A 2: A Y B A B B A B 3: Y A A B W Y A B 4: B B B A Y A Y B 5: A B B B B Y A Y 6: B A A Y B A Y W 7: A B Y A B A B B 8: A B W Y A B A A We need to see pattern: maybe output is composed of four quadrants each being input rotated 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°? Let's test. Quadrant size 4x4 each. Top-left quadrant (rows1-4, cols1-4) of output: Rows1-4, cols1-4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A That's exactly the original input. Good. Top-right quadrant (rows1-4, cols5-8): Rows1: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B What is this? Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise? Input rotated 90° cw would be size 4x4 where new row i = column from bottom? Let's compute quickly. Input matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90 cw => new matrix: Row1: B,Y,W,Y? Wait compute: column0 from bottom to top: B, Y, A, Y? Actually column0 (first column) values top to bottom: Y, A, Y, B. Reverse order gives B, Y, A, Y. So row1 = B Y A Y. Row2: column1 values: W, Y, A, B -> reversed: B A Y W. Row3: column2: B, B, A, B -> reversed: B A B B? Wait reversed: B A B B? Actually column2 values top to bottom: B, B, A, B. Reverse: B, A, B, B. Row4: column3: A, A, B, A -> reversed: A B A A. So rotated 90 cw matrix: Row1: B Y A Y Row2: B A Y W Row3: B A B B Row4: A B A A Now compare to top-right quadrant we have: Row1: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe it's rotated 90 ccw? Let's compute 90 ccw (or 270 cw). 90 ccw matrix: column from left to right reversed rows? Compute: new row i = column i from top to bottom? Actually 90 ccw: new row1 = column4 (last) top to bottom? Let's compute quickly: Input columns: col3 (index3) values: A, A, B, A. So row1 = A A B A. That matches top-right row1! Good. Row2 = column2 values: B, B, A, B => B B A B matches row2. Row3 = column1 values: W, Y, A, B => W Y A B matches row3. Row4 = column0 values: Y, A, Y, B => Y A Y B matches row4. Yes! So top-right quadrant is input rotated 90° counterclockwise (i.e., 270° cw). Good. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows5-8, cols1-4): Rows5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y What is this? Likely input rotated 90° clockwise. Let's compare with earlier cw rotation we computed: rows: 1: B Y A Y 2: B A Y W 3: B A B B 4: A B A A Our bottom-left rows are: Row5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y Not matching. Maybe it's rotated 180°? Let's compute 180 rotation: reverse both rows and columns. Input reversed rows order and each row reversed. Input rows reversed: Row4 reversed: A B B B Row3 reversed: B A A Y Row2 reversed: A B Y A Row1 reversed: A B W Y That matches ... [4260 chars truncated]
"A cartographer draws a single chart of an island and pins four copies to the navigation table, each turned so a different coast faces north—together they map every approach to the harbor."
120b: k=1
See: A small square nautical chart with colored depth soundings and landmarks.
Do: Assemble a master chart by placing four copies of the island map into a larger frame. Each copy is rotated so that a different shoreline points upward, giving navigators a view from every bearing.
Grid: The master chart is twice the width and height of the original, divided into four quadrants. Each quadrant holds the same island chart at a different rotation.
We need to infer rule: Input is a small grid, output is larger (twice width and height) with four rotated copies placed in quadrants. Let's verify with example. Input 4x4. Output appears 8x8. Let's map quadrants. Input grid: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A We need to produce 8x8 where each quadrant is a rotated version. Let's label quadrants: top-left (TL), top-right (TR), bottom-left (BL), bottom-right (BR). Each quadrant size 4x4. We need to see which rotation each quadrant uses. Take TL quadrant of output (rows0-3, cols0-3): Rows from output: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A That matches input exactly (no rotation). So TL = original orientation. TR quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0-3 columns 4-7: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Let's extract as 4x4 matrix: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B What rotation of input yields that? Let's compute rotations of input. Original: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90° clockwise: new[i][j] = original[3-j][i] Compute quickly: result matrix: Row0: B Y Y B? Let's compute systematically. I'll write original coordinates (r,c). Rot90 cw: (c, N-1-r). Let's produce matrix: c=0 column: rows 3 to0: B, Y, A, Y => row0 = B Y A Y? Wait need order: for each new row r' = 0..3, we take original row N-1 - r'? Actually easier: rotate cw: new[r][c] = original[N-1-c][r]. Let's compute new matrix: For r=0: c=0: original[3][0]=B c=1: original[2][0]=Y c=2: original[1][0]=A c=3: original[0][0]=Y Row0: B Y A Y Row1 (r=1): c0: original[3][1]=B c1: original[2][1]=A c2: original[1][1]=Y c3: original[0][1]=W Row1: B A Y W Row2 (r=2): c0: original[3][2]=B c1: original[2][2]=A c2: original[1][2]=B c3: original[0][2]=B Row2: B A B B Row3 (r=3): c0: original[3][3]=A c1: original[2][3]=B c2: original[1][3]=A c3: original[0][3]=A Row3: A B A A So cw rotation yields: B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A B A A Not matching TR. Rotate 180 (or 90 ccw). 180 rotation: flip both axes. Compute: new[r][c] = original[3-r][3-c]. Row0: original[3][3]=A, [3][2]=B, [3][1]=B, [3][0]=B => A B B B Row1: original[2][3]=B, [2][2]=A, [2][1]=A, [2][0]=Y => B A A Y Row2: original[1][3]=A, [1][2]=B, [1][1]=Y, [1][0]=A => A B Y A Row3: original[0][3]=A, [0][2]=B, [0][1]=W, [0][0]=Y => A B W Y So 180 rotation matrix: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y Not matching TR. Rotate 90 ccw (or 270 cw). Compute: new[r][c] = original[c][3-r]. Row0: c0 original[0][3]=A, c1 original[1][3]=A, c2 original[2][3]=B, c3 original[3][3]=A => A A B A Row1: c0 original[0][2]=B, c1 original[1][2]=B, c2 original[2][2]=A, c3 original[3][2]=B => B B A B Row2: c0 original[0][1]=W, c1 original[1][1]=Y, c2 original[2][1]=A, c3 original[3][1]=B => W Y A B Row3: c0 original[0][0]=Y, c1 original[1][0]=A, c2 original[2][0]=Y, c3 original[3][0]=B => Y A Y B That matches TR exactly! Good. So TR = input rotated 90° c ... [4784 chars truncated]
"A chip designer copies a single logic block into four quadrants of a die, rotating each copy so the pin-outs face outward in every direction—same circuit, four orientations, one integrated package."
120b: k=1
See: A small square silicon block with colored transistor regions.
Do: Fabricate a larger die by placing four copies of the logic block in a 2×2 layout. Each copy is rotated so its interface pins face a different edge of the package.
Grid: The finished die is twice the dimensions of the original block. Four identical circuit copies, each at a successive quarter-turn, tile the silicon perfectly.
We need to infer rule: Input grid is some size N x N? Example 1 input is 4x4. Output is 8x8 (twice dimensions). The description: place four copies rotated 0°,90°,180°,270° in 2x2 layout. So output is composed of four quadrants each being the input rotated accordingly. Let's test with example. Input 4x4 matrix: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A We need to produce 8x8 output. According to description: top-left quadrant maybe original orientation? top-right rotated 90°? bottom-left rotated 270°? bottom-right rotated 180°? Let's verify with given output. Let's compute rotations. Define original matrix O (4x4). Let's compute O rotated 90° clockwise (R90). Standard: new[i][j] = O[N-1-j][i]. Let's compute quickly. O: 0: Y W B A 1: A Y B A 2: Y A A B 3: B B B A R90 (clockwise): Row0: from col0 bottom to top: B Y A Y? Wait compute: For i=0, j from 0..3: new[0][j] = O[3-j][0]. So j0: O[3][0]=B, j1: O[2][0]=Y, j2: O[1][0]=A, j3: O[0][0]=Y => row0: B Y A Y Row1: i=1: new[1][j]=O[3-j][1]; j0 O[3][1]=B, j1 O[2][1]=A, j2 O[1][1]=Y, j3 O[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2: i=2: O[3-j][2]; j0 O[3][2]=B, j1 O[2][2]=A, j2 O[1][2]=B, j3 O[0][2]=B => B A B B Row3: i=3: O[3-j][3]; j0 O[3][3]=A, j1 O[2][3]=B, j2 O[1][3]=A, j3 O[0][3]=A => A B A A R180 (rotate 180): reverse both rows and columns. Equivalent to rotate 90 twice. Let's compute: Row0 = O[3][3], O[3][2], O[3][1], O[3][0] => A B B B Row1: O[2][3], O[2][2], O[2][1], O[2][0] => B A A Y Row2: O[1][3], O[1][2], O[1][1], O[1][0] => A B Y A Row3: O[0][3], O[0][2], O[0][1], O[0][0] => A B W Y R270 (or 90 ccw) = rotate 90 clockwise three times. Compute: Row0 = O[0][3], O[1][3], O[2][3], O[3][3] => A A B A Row1 = O[0][2], O[1][2], O[2][2], O[3][2] => B B A B Row2 = O[0][1], O[1][1], O[2][1], O[3][1] => W Y A B Row3 = O[0][0], O[1][0], O[2][0], O[3][0] => Y A Y B Now we need to see how output 8x8 is arranged. Let's write output rows given: Row0: Y W B A A A B A Row1: A Y B A B B A B Row2: Y A A B W Y A B Row3: B B B A Y A Y B Row4: A B B B B Y A Y Row5: B A A Y B A Y W Row6: A B Y A B A B B Row7: A B W Y A B A A Now let's split into quadrants 4x4 each. Top-left (rows0-3, cols0-3): Rows0-3, cols0-3: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A That's exactly original O. Good. Top-right (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0: cols4-7: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B That matches R270? Let's compare R270 we computed: rows: 0: A A B A (matches) 1: B B A B (matches) 2: W Y A B (matches) 3: Y A Y B (matches) Good. So top-right is rotated 270° (i.e., 90° counterclockwise) relative to original. Bottom-left (rows4-7, cols0-3): Rows4: A B B B Row5: B A A Y Row6: A B Y A Row7: A B W Y Compare with R90? R90 we computed rows: 0: B Y A Y 1: B A Y W 2: B A B B 3: A B A A Not match. Compare with R180? R180 rows: 0: A B B B (matches row4) 1: B A A Y (matches row5) 2: A B Y A (matches row6) 3: A B W Y (match ... [4152 chars truncated]
"Janus looks not in two directions but four—each face gazes outward from the crossroads, and behind every visage lies the same divine countenance, merely turned upon its axis."
120b: k=1
See: A small square mosaic depicting a divine face in colored tesserae.
Do: Erect a four-sided shrine at the crossroads. Each face of the shrine bears the same mosaic portrait, but rotated so the god appears to gaze down each of the four roads.
Grid: The shrine's unfolded plan is twice the original mosaic in each dimension—four panels in a 2×2 arrangement, each a rotated copy of the sacred image.
We need to infer rule. Input is a small square mosaic (original). Output is a larger grid 2x size each dimension? In example, input size? Let's count. Input grid lines: "Y W B A" etc 4 columns, 4 rows. So 4x4. Output appears 8x8 (twice each dimension). Indeed output lines: first line "Y W B A A A B A" that's 8 columns. So output is 8x8. The description: "Erect a four-sided shrine at the crossroads. Each face of the shrine bears the same mosaic portrait, but rotated so the god appears to gaze down each of the four roads. The shrine's unfolded plan is twice the original mosaic in each dimension—four panels in a 2×2 arrangement, each a rotated copy of the sacred image." Interpretation: Take original image. Create 2x2 tiling where each quadrant is a rotated version of original: maybe rotations 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°? The description: each face rotated so the god appears to gaze down each of the four roads (directions). So likely top-left quadrant is original orientation, top-right is rotated 90° clockwise, bottom-left rotated 270° (or 90 ccw), bottom-right rotated 180°. Need to verify with example. Let's compute. Original 4x4 matrix: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A Now output 8x8. Let's split into quadrants 4x4 each. Output rows (list): 0: Y W B A A A B A 1: A Y B A B B A B 2: Y A A B W Y A B 3: B B B A Y A Y B 4: A B B B B Y A Y 5: B A A Y B A Y W 6: A B Y A B A B B 7: A B W Y A B A A Now quadrants: Top-left (rows0-3, cols0-3): Rows0-3 first 4 cols: 0: Y W B A 1: A Y B A 2: Y A A B 3: B B B A That's exactly original. Good. Top-right (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0: cols4-7: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Let's see if this is original rotated 90° clockwise. Compute original rotated 90 cw: new[i][j] = original[n-1-j][i]. Original 4x4. Let's compute quickly. Original matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90 cw => size 4x4: Row0 (i=0): original[3][0]=B, [2][0]=Y, [1][0]=A, [0][0]=Y => B Y A Y Row1 (i=1): original[3][1]=B, [2][1]=A, [1][1]=Y, [0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2 (i=2): original[3][2]=B, [2][2]=A, [1][2]=B, [0][2]=B => B A B B Row3 (i=3): original[3][3]=A, [2][3]=B, [1][3]=A, [0][3]=A => A B A A So rotated 90 cw matrix: Row0: B Y A Y Row1: B A Y W Row2: B A B B Row3: A B A A But top-right quadrant we have: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B That does not match. Maybe rotation is 90 ccw? Let's compute 90 ccw (or 270 cw). 90 ccw: new[i][j] = original[j][n-1-i]. Compute: Row0 (i=0): original[0][3]=A, [1][3]=A, [2][3]=B, [3][3]=A => A A B A Row1 (i=1): original[0][2]=B, [1][2]=B, [2][2]=A, [3][2]=B => B B A B Row2 (i=2): original[0][1]=W, [1][1]=Y, [2][1]=A, [3][1]=B => W Y A B Row3 (i=3): original[0][0]=Y, [1][0]=A, [2][0]=Y, [3][0]=B => Y A Y B That matches exactly top-right quadrant! Good. So top-right is original rotated 90° counterclockwise. Now bottom-left quadrant ( ... [5083 chars truncated]
"Four couples learn the same choreography but start facing different walls of the ballroom—when the music plays, the identical routine unfolds in four orientations simultaneously, filling the entire floor."
120b: k=1
See: A small square dance floor with colored position markers for a single couple's routine.
Do: Expand the ballroom to twice the size and station four couples in its quadrants. Each couple performs the identical choreography but begins facing a different wall, so their colored traces rotate relative to one another.
Grid: The full ballroom floor is a 2×2 grid of dance squares. Each square holds the same pattern of colored positions, rotated by a quarter-turn from its neighbor.
We need to infer rule. Input is 4x4? Example 1 input is 4x4 grid. Output is 8x8. So rule: expand to double size (2x scaling) and fill quadrants with rotated versions of original pattern? Let's examine. Input1 matrix (4x4): Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Output 8x8 given. Let's try to see quadrants 4x4 each. Take output rows 1-4, cols1-4: should be original? Let's list output first 4 rows, first 4 cols. Output rows: 1: Y W B A A A B A 2: A Y B A B B A B 3: Y A A B W Y A B 4: B B B A Y A Y B Take first 4 columns of each row: Row1 cols1-4: Y W B A (matches input row1) Row2: A Y B A (matches input row2) Row3: Y A A B (matches input row3) Row4: B B B A (matches input row4) So top-left quadrant is original. Now top-right quadrant (rows1-4, cols5-8). Let's extract: Row1 cols5-8: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B What transformation? Possibly rotate original 90° clockwise? Let's compute original rotated 90° clockwise: original matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90 cw => new matrix where new[i][j] = original[n-1-j][i]. Let's compute quickly. Indices 0-3. Compute rotated cw: Row0 (i=0): original[3][0]=B, [2][0]=Y, [1][0]=A, [0][0]=Y => B Y A Y Row1 (i=1): original[3][1]=B, [2][1]=A, [1][1]=Y, [0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2 (i=2): original[3][2]=B, [2][2]=A, [1][2]=B, [0][2]=B => B A B B Row3 (i=3): original[3][3]=A, [2][3]=B, [1][3]=A, [0][3]=A => A B A A Now compare to top-right quadrant we have: Row1: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe rotate 90° counterclockwise? Compute ccw: new[i][j]=original[j][n-1-i]. Compute ccw: Row0: original[0][3]=A, [1][3]=A, [2][3]=B, [3][3]=A => A A B A (matches row1 top-right!) Row1: original[0][2]=B, [1][2]=B, [2][2]=A, [3][2]=B => B B A B (matches row2) Row2: original[0][1]=W, [1][1]=Y, [2][1]=A, [3][1]=B => W Y A B (matches row3) Row3: original[0][0]=Y, [1][0]=A, [2][0]=Y, [3][0]=B => Y A Y B (matches row4) Great! So top-right quadrant is original rotated 90° counterclockwise. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows5-8, cols1-4). Let's extract rows5-8 first 4 cols from output: Row5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y What transformation? Possibly rotate 90° clockwise? Let's compute original rotated 90° clockwise we earlier got: Row0: B Y A Y Row1: B A Y W Row2: B A B B Row3: A B A A But bottom-left quadrant rows5-8 are: Row5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y Not matching cw. Maybe rotate 180°? 180 rotation of original: reverse both rows and columns. Original 180: Row0 becomes reversed row3: A B B B Row1 reversed row2: B A A Y? Wait row2 original is Y A A B reversed => B A A Y (yes) Row2 reversed row1: A B Y A? row1 original A Y B A reversed => A B Y A (yes) Row3 reversed row0: A W B Y? row0 original Y W B A reversed => A B W Y? Wait original row0 Y W B A reversed => A B W Y (yes) Thus bottom-left ... [9398 chars truncated]
"A crystal seed grows into four twinned domains—each domain preserves the atomic lattice of the original nucleus but is rotated at the twin boundary, so the mineral displays the same internal order from every cleaved face."
120b: k=1
See: A small square cross-section of a crystal lattice, each colored cell an atom in the unit cell.
Do: Grow the crystal until it twins into four domains arranged in a 2×2 block. Each domain replicates the original unit cell but is rotated at the boundary, as though the lattice was turned before continuing growth.
Grid: The twinned crystal cross-section is twice the dimensions of the seed lattice. Four domains tile it—each a rotated copy of the original unit cell, joined seamlessly at their twin planes.
We need to infer rule: Input is a small grid (n x n). Output is 2n x 2n, composed of four rotated copies of input? Let's examine example. Input 4x4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Output 8x8 given. Let's split output into quadrants 4x4 each. Output rows (8): 1: Y W B A A A B A 2: A Y B A B B A B 3: Y A A B W Y A B 4: B B B A Y A Y B 5: A B B B B Y A Y 6: B A A Y B A Y W 7: A B Y A B A B B 8: A B W Y A B A A Now quadrants: Top-left (rows1-4, cols1-4): Rows1-4 cols1-4: 1: Y W B A 2: A Y B A 3: Y A A B 4: B B B A That's exactly the original input. Good. Top-right (rows1-4, cols5-8): Rows1-4 cols5-8: 1: A A B A 2: B B A B 3: W Y A B 4: Y A Y B What is this? Possibly input rotated 90°? Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise: original matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Clockwise 90 => new rows = columns reversed: column0 from bottom to top becomes first row: [B, Y, A, Y]?? Wait compute: column0 (first column) top to bottom: Y, A, Y, B. Reverse => B, Y, A, Y. That's row0 of rotated. Row0 would be B Y A Y. Not match top-right row1: A A B A. Maybe rotated 180? 180 would be reversed both rows and columns: original reversed rows order and each row reversed. Let's compute 180: rows reversed: row4 B B B A reversed => A B B B ; row3 Y A A B reversed => B A A Y ; row2 A Y B A reversed => A B Y A ; row1 Y W B A reversed => A B W Y. So 180 matrix: Row1: A B B B Row2: B A A Y Row3: A B Y A Row4: A B W Y Now compare top-right quadrant rows1-4: we have Row1: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B Not match. Maybe top-right is input reflected horizontally? Horizontal flip (mirror left-right): each row reversed. Row1 reversed: A B W Y Row2: A B Y A Row3: B A A Y Row4: A B B B That's not top-right. Maybe top-right is input rotated 90° counterclockwise? Compute CCW: column last to first as rows. Column3 (index3) top to bottom: A, A, B, A -> reversed? Wait CCW: new row0 = column3 top to bottom? Actually CCW 90: new row i = column i from rightmost? Let's compute: CCW 90 matrix: rows become columns from rightmost to leftmost. So new row0 = column3 (index3) top to bottom: A, A, B, A => A A B A matches top-right row1! Good. Row1 matches. Row2 should be column2 top to bottom: B, B, A, B => B B A B matches top-right row2. Row3 column1 top to bottom: W, Y, A, B => W Y A B matches row3. Row4 column0 top to bottom: Y, A, Y, B => Y A Y B matches row4. Perfect! So top-right quadrant is input rotated 90° CCW (i.e., 270° clockwise). Good. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows5-8, cols1-4): Rows5-8 cols1-4: 5: A B B B 6: B A A Y 7: A B Y A 8: A B W Y That matches the 180-degree rotation we computed earlier! Indeed bottom-left is input rotated 180°. Bottom-right quadrant (rows5-8, cols5-8): Rows5-8 cols5-8: 5: B Y A Y 6: A Y W Wait need full rows: Row5 cols5-8: B Y A Y Row6: A Y A W? Let's list row6: row6 is "B A A Y B A Y W". cols5-8 are positions 5- ... [4715 chars truncated]
"A baker quarters her dough and lays each piece into the pan with a different twist of the wrist, so the same marbling appears from four different angles on the finished pastry."
120b: k=1
See: A small square of marbled dough, its swirls of color frozen mid-fold.
Do: Place the original dough in one corner of a baking sheet. Cut three identical copies and rotate each by a different quarter-turn before pressing them into the remaining corners, so the marble pattern spirals differently in each quadrant.
Grid: The baking sheet is twice as wide and twice as tall as the original dough square. Four portions tile it perfectly—same ingredients, different orientations, one seamless sheet.
We need to infer rule. Input is a square? Example 1 input is 4x4. Output is 8x8 (twice dimensions). The description: place original dough in one corner, cut three copies rotate each by different quarter-turn before pressing them into remaining corners, so pattern spirals differently in each quadrant. So output is 2x size, tiled with four quadrants: original orientation in top-left? Then rotated copies in other quadrants: maybe top-right rotated 90°, bottom-left rotated 180°, bottom-right rotated 270°? Let's test with example. We have input 4x4 matrix. Let's label coordinates (r,c). We'll compute quadrants of output 8x8: TL (rows0-3, cols0-3) should be original? Let's check output first 4 rows, first 4 cols. Output rows (0-index): Row0: Y W B A A A B A Row1: A Y B A B B A B Row2: Y A A B W Y A B Row3: B B B A Y A Y B Take first 4 columns of each row: Row0 cols0-3: Y W B A -> matches input row0 exactly (Y W B A). Good. Row1 cols0-3: A Y B A -> matches input row1 (A Y B A). Good. Row2 cols0-3: Y A A B -> matches input row2 (Y A A B). Good. Row3 cols0-3: B B B A -> matches input row3 (B B B A). Good. So TL is original. Now top-right quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7). Let's extract. Row0 cols4-7: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: Y A B Wait row2 has only 4 columns: row2 cols4-7: W Y A B? Actually row2 full: Y A A B W Y A B. So cols4-7: W Y A B. Row3: Y A Y B (row3 full: B B B A Y A Y B). So cols4-7: Y A Y B. Now compare to rotated versions of input. Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise. Input matrix: 0: Y W B A 1: A Y B A 2: Y A A B 3: B B B A Rotate 90 cw => new matrix size 4x4 where new[r][c] = original[3-c][r]. Let's compute: Row0 (r=0): original[3-0][0]=original[3][0]=B; original[2][0]=Y; original[1][0]=A; original[0][0]=Y => B Y A Y Row1: original[3][1]=B; original[2][1]=A; original[1][1]=Y; original[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2: original[3][2]=B; original[2][2]=A; original[1][2]=B; original[0][2]=B => B A B B Row3: original[3][3]=A; original[2][3]=B; original[1][3]=A; original[0][3]=A => A B A A Now compare to top-right quadrant we observed: Rows0-3: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe top-right is rotated 270° (counterclockwise) or 90° anticlockwise? Let's compute 90° anticlockwise (or 270 cw). Anticlockwise: new[r][c] = original[c][3 - r]. Compute: Row0: original[0][3]=A, original[1][3]=A, original[2][3]=B, original[3][3]=A => A A B A Row1: original[0][2]=B, original[1][2]=B, original[2][2]=A, original[3][2]=B => B B A B Row2: original[0][1]=W, original[1][1]=Y, original[2][1]=A, original[3][1]=B => W Y A B Row3: original[0][0]=Y, original[1][0]=A, original[2][0]=Y, original[3][0]=B => Y A Y B That matches exactly! So top-right quadrant is input rotated 90° anticlockwise (or 270° clockwise). Good. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows4-7, cols0-3). Let's extract rows4-7 from output. Row4: A B B B B Y A Y Row5: B A A Y B A Y ... [4566 chars truncated]
"A quartet takes a single melodic phrase and each musician enters from a different inversion—the theme heard right-side-up, upside-down, backwards, and in retrograde inversion—filling the concert hall with symmetry."
120b: k=1
See: A short musical phrase notated on a small colored score, each cell a note in the composition.
Do: Arrange four performances of the phrase into a larger score: the original reading, and three transformed versions each rotated as if the sheet music were physically turned on the music stand before playing.
Grid: The full score is a 2×2 arrangement of the original phrase's block, each quadrant a different rotational reading, producing a composition twice the size in each dimension.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid (maybe 4x4). Output is larger (8x8) as described: 2x2 arrangement of original phrase block, each quadrant a different rotational reading: original, rotated 90°, 180°, 270°? Let's examine example. Input 4x4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A Output 8x8 given. Let's map quadrants. We need to see if output is composed of four 4x4 blocks arranged 2x2. Let's split output into top-left 4x4, top-right 4x4, bottom-left 4x4, bottom-right 4x4. Output rows (8): 1 Y W B A A A B A 2 A Y B A B B A B 3 Y A A B W Y A B 4 B B B A Y A Y B 5 A B B B B Y A Y 6 B A A Y B A Y W 7 A B Y A B A B B 8 A B W Y A B A A Now top-left block rows1-4 cols1-4: Rows1-4 cols1-4: 1: Y W B A 2: A Y B A 3: Y A A B 4: B B B A That's exactly the original input. Good. Top-right block rows1-4 cols5-8: Rows1 col5-8: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B What is this? Possibly input rotated 90° clockwise? Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise: original matrix 4x4. Write coordinates. Input matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90° clockwise => new matrix where new[i][j] = old[n-1-j][i]. Compute: Row0 (i=0): old[3][0]=B, old[2][0]=Y, old[1][0]=A, old[0][0]=Y => B Y A Y Row1 (i=1): old[3][1]=B, old[2][1]=A, old[1][1]=Y, old[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2 (i=2): old[3][2]=B, old[2][2]=A, old[1][2]=B, old[0][2]=B => B A B B Row3 (i=3): old[3][3]=A, old[2][3]=B, old[1][3]=A, old[0][3]=A => A B A A So rotated 90° clockwise matrix: B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A B A A But top-right block we have: A A B A B B A B W Y A B Y A Y B That does not match. Maybe it's rotated 90° counterclockwise? Compute ccw: new[i][j] = old[j][n-1-i]. Row0: old[0][3]=A, old[1][3]=A, old[2][3]=B, old[3][3]=A => A A B A matches first row of top-right! Good. Row1: old[0][2]=B, old[1][2]=B, old[2][2]=A, old[3][2]=B => B B A B matches second row. Row2: old[0][1]=W, old[1][1]=Y, old[2][1]=A, old[3][1]=B => W Y A B matches third row. Row3: old[0][0]=Y, old[1][0]=A, old[2][0]=Y, old[3][0]=B => Y A Y B matches fourth row. Great! So top-right block is input rotated 90° counterclockwise (i.e., 270° clockwise). Good. Now bottom-left block rows5-8 cols1-4: Rows5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y What transformation? Possibly 180° rotation? Let's compute 180° rotation of input: reverse both rows and columns. Input 180°: reverse rows order and each row reversed. Original rows reversed: Row4: B B B A -> reversed: A B B B Row3: Y A A B -> reversed: B A A Y Row2: A Y B A -> reversed: A B Y A Row1: Y W B A -> reversed: A B W Y Thus 180° rotated matrix: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y Matches bottom-left block exactly. Good. Bottom-right block rows5-8 cols5-8: Rows5 col5-8: B Y A Y Row6: A Y W Wait need 4 columns: Row6 col5-8: A Y W ? Let's list row6 full: B A A Y B A Y W. So cols5-8 are B A Y W? Ac ... [4523 chars truncated]
"A coach diagrams a play on a whiteboard, then tells each squad to run it facing a different sideline—same formation, four orientations, full-court coverage."
120b: k=1
See: A small tactical diagram with colored position markers on a square clipboard.
Do: Deploy four squads onto a court twice the size: one runs the play as drawn, the others execute the same formation but oriented toward different edges of the field, so together they tile the full arena.
Grid: The full court is four clipboard-sized zones. Each zone holds the same formation rotated to face a different direction, and together they fill the doubled playing surface without gaps.
We need to infer rule. Input is a small grid (size maybe 4x4). Output is larger (8x8) in example. The description: "Deploy four squads onto a court twice the size: one runs the play as drawn, the others execute the same formation but oriented toward different edges of the field, so together they tile the full arena." So we take the input pattern and rotate it to four orientations (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) and tile them into a 2x2 arrangement to make double size (both dimensions doubled). So output size is double each dimension (if input N x N, output 2N x 2N). Example: input 4x4, output 8x8. The arrangement: top-left quadrant is original? top-right maybe rotated 90°? bottom-left rotated 270°? bottom-right rotated 180°? Need to check with example. Let's label input matrix I (rows 0-3, cols 0-3). Write them: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A Now output 8x8 rows: Row0: Y W B A A A B A Row1: A Y B A B B A B Row2: Y A A B W Y A B Row3: B B B A Y A Y B Row4: A B B B B Y A Y Row5: B A A Y B A Y W Row6: A B Y A B A B B Row7: A B W Y A B A A We need to see quadrants each 4x4. Top-left quadrant (rows0-3, cols0-3): Rows0-3, cols0-3: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A That's exactly the original input. Good. Top-right quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0-3, cols4-7: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B What is this? Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise? Input rotated 90° clockwise would have size 4x4 where new row i = original column (N-1 - i) maybe. Let's compute. Original matrix I: [0,0] Y [0,1] W [0,2] B [0,3] A [1,0] A [1,1] Y [1,2] B [1,3] A [2,0] Y [2,1] A [2,2] A [2,3] B [3,0] B [3,1] B [3,2] B [3,3] A Rotate 90° clockwise => matrix R where R[i][j] = I[N-1-j][i]. Let's compute rows. R row0 (i=0): j from 0..3: I[3][0]=B, I[2][0]=Y, I[1][0]=A, I[0][0]=Y => B Y A Y Row0: B Y A Y R row1 (i=1): I[3][1]=B, I[2][1]=A, I[1][1]=Y, I[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row1: B A Y W R row2 (i=2): I[3][2]=B, I[2][2]=A, I[1][2]=B, I[0][2]=B => B A B B Row2: B A B B R row3 (i=3): I[3][3]=A, I[2][3]=B, I[1][3]=A, I[0][3]=A => A B A A Row3: A B A A Now compare to top-right quadrant we observed: Rows0-3: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe top-right is rotated 90° counterclockwise? Let's compute 90° CCW (or 270° clockwise). CCW: R[i][j] = I[j][N-1-i]. Compute: Row0 (i=0): j0 I[0][3]=A, j1 I[1][3]=A, j2 I[2][3]=B, j3 I[3][3]=A => A A B A matches top-right row0! Good. Row1 (i=1): I[0][2]=B, I[1][2]=B, I[2][2]=A, I[3][2]=B => B B A B matches row1. Row2 (i=2): I[0][1]=W, I[1][1]=Y, I[2][1]=A, I[3][1]=B => W Y A B matches row2. Row3 (i=3): I[0][0]=Y, I[1][0]=A, I[2][0]=Y, I[3][0]=B => Y A Y B matches row3. Great! So top-right quadrant is input rotated 90° CCW (i.e., 270° clockwise) which corresponds to orientation "facing different edge" maybe rotated left. Now bott ... [7511 chars truncated]
"A storm cell splits into four fronts, each sweeping outward from the eye in a different rotational bearing, painting the radar map with the same cloud signature turned four ways."
120b: k=1
See: A small square radar return showing a colorful storm pattern.
Do: The storm propagates into four quadrants of a larger radar display. Each quadrant carries the same precipitation pattern but rotated as though the wind shear twisted each front to a different compass bearing.
Grid: The full radar image is twice the dimensions of the original cell, tiled by four copies of the storm pattern, each rotated by successive quarter-turns.
We need to infer rule. Input grid size? Example 1 input is 4x4. Output is 8x8 (twice dimensions). Output appears to be tiled four copies rotated by 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°? Let's test. Input matrix I (4x4): Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A We need to produce 8x8 output O. Let's compute quadrants: top-left quadrant (rows0-3, cols0-3) maybe original? Let's see O rows0-3, cols0-3: According to output first 4 rows first 4 columns: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A Matches original exactly. Good. Top-right quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7) should be rotation? Let's extract from output rows0-3, cols4-7: Row0 cols4-7: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Now, what is rotation of original? Let's compute 90° clockwise rotation of original: original 4x4, rotate cw: new matrix R90 where R90[i][j] = I[3-j][i]. Let's compute quickly. I: 0: Y W B A 1: A Y B A 2: Y A A B 3: B B B A R90 (size 4): row0: from col0 bottom to top: B Y A Y? Wait compute: for j from 0..3, i=0: R90[0][j] = I[3-j][0] j0: I[3][0]=B j1: I[2][0]=Y j2: I[1][0]=A j3: I[0][0]=Y So row0: B Y A Y Row1 (i=1): R90[1][j]=I[3-j][1] j0: I[3][1]=B j1: I[2][1]=A j2: I[1][1]=Y j3: I[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2 (i=2): I[3-j][2] j0: I[3][2]=B j1: I[2][2]=A j2: I[1][2]=B j3: I[0][2]=B => B A B B Row3 (i=3): I[3-j][3] j0: I[3][3]=A j1: I[2][3]=B j2: I[1][3]=A j3: I[0][3]=A => A B A A Now compare to top-right quadrant we extracted: rows0-3, cols4-7: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe rotation counterclockwise? Let's compute 90° CCW (or 270° cw). CCW: Rccw[i][j] = I[j][3-i]. Compute quickly: i0 row: j0..3: I[0][3]=A, I[1][3]=A, I[2][3]=B, I[3][3]=A => A A B A matches row0 of top-right! Good. i1 row: I[0][2]=B, I[1][2]=B, I[2][2]=A, I[3][2]=B => B B A B matches row1. Good. i2 row: I[0][1]=W, I[1][1]=Y, I[2][1]=A, I[3][1]=B => W Y A B matches row2. Good. i3 row: I[0][0]=Y, I[1][0]=A, I[2][0]=Y, I[3][0]=B => Y A Y B matches row3. Good. Thus top-right quadrant is original rotated 90° CCW (i.e., 270° cw). Good. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows4-7, cols0-3) should be rotation 180°? Let's extract rows4-7, cols0-3: Row4: A B B B Row5: B A A Y Row6: A B Y A Row7: A B W Y Now compute 180° rotation of original: I180[i][j] = I[3-i][3-j]. Compute rows: i0: j0 I[3][3]=A, j1 I[3][2]=B, j2 I[3][1]=B, j3 I[3][0]=B => A B B B matches row4. i1: I[2][3]=B, I[2][2]=A, I[2][1]=A, I[2][0]=Y => B A A Y matches row5. i2: I[1][3]=A, I[1][2]=B, I[1][1]=Y, I[1][0]=A => A B Y A matches row6. i3: I[0][3]=A, I[0][2]=B, I[0][1]=W, I[0][0]=Y => A B W Y matches row7. Good. Bottom-right quadrant (rows4-7, cols4-7) should be rotation 90° clockwise (or 270° CCW). Let's extract: Row4 cols4-7: B Y A Y Row5: A Y B W Row6: B A Y W Row7: B A A A Now compute 90° clockwise rotation of original (R90 we computed earlier): rows: Row0: B Y A ... [5230 chars truncated]
"An architect takes a single ornamental tile and sets it at four rotations around a central point, creating a larger mosaic panel where the same design faces every wall of the room."
120b: k=1
See: A small square decorative tile with an intricate colored pattern.
Do: Mount four copies of the tile into a 2×2 panel. Each tile is rotated so that the pattern radiates outward in a different direction, as though the artisan turned each piece before grouting it into place.
Grid: The finished panel is exactly four tiles—twice the width and height of the original. No grout lines or borders interrupt the pattern; only the rotation distinguishes each quadrant.
We need to infer rule: tile duplication with rotations. Input is a square tile. Output is 2x size (twice width and height). Quadrants are rotated versions of original tile, each rotated to radiate outward. Likely: top-left quadrant is original orientation. top-right is rotated 90° clockwise. bottom-left is rotated 90° counterclockwise. bottom-right is rotated 180°. Or maybe each quadrant rotated to point outward from center: top-left rotated 0°, top-right rotated 90°, bottom-left rotated 270°, bottom-right rotated 180°. Let's test with example. Example 1: Input grid size? Let's count rows: given lines: Y W B A (4) A Y B A (4) Y A A B (4) B B B A (4) So 4x4 input. Output grid size? Provided 8x8 lines (8 rows each 8 columns). Let's map quadrants. We need to compute rotations of input and see if they match output quadrants. Let's label input matrix I (rows 0-3, cols 0-3). We'll compute rotations. I'll write I: r0: [Y, W, B, A] r1: [A, Y, B, A] r2: [Y, A, A, B] r3: [B, B, B, A] Now output O 8x8 rows: Row0: Y W B A A A B A Row1: A Y B A B B A B Row2: Y A A B W Y A B Row3: B B B A Y A Y B Row4: A B B B B Y A Y Row5: B A A Y B A Y W Row6: A B Y A B A B B Row7: A B W Y A B A A Let's split into quadrants each 4x4. Top-left (rows0-3, cols0-3): Rows0-3, cols0-3: r0: Y W B A r1: A Y B A r2: Y A A B r3: B B B A That's exactly the original input! Good. Top-right (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0-3, cols4-7: r0: A A B A r1: B B A B r2: W Y A B r3: Y A Y B Let's compute input rotated 90° clockwise. Rotation 90 cw of I yields matrix R90 where new row i = column (n-1 - i) of original? Let's compute. Original I columns: col0: Y, A, Y, B col1: W, Y, A, B col2: B, B, A, B col3: A, A, B, A 90 cw results rows: row0 = col3 reversed? Actually 90 cw: new row0 = col0 from bottom to top? Wait typical: rotate cw: new[i][j] = old[n-1-j][i]. So compute. Let's compute R90 (size 4): For i=0 row: j=0 => old[3][0]=B j=1 => old[2][0]=Y j=2 => old[1][0]=A j=3 => old[0][0]=Y So row0: B Y A Y Row1 (i=1): j0 => old[3][1]=B j1 => old[2][1]=A j2 => old[1][1]=Y j3 => old[0][1]=W => B A Y W Row2 (i=2): j0 => old[3][2]=B j1 => old[2][2]=A j2 => old[1][2]=B j3 => old[0][2]=B => B A B B Row3 (i=3): j0 => old[3][3]=A j1 => old[2][3]=B j2 => old[1][3]=A j3 => old[0][3]=A => A B A A So R90 matrix: [ B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A B A A ] Now compare to top-right quadrant we extracted: Rows0-3 of top-right: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B That does not match R90. Maybe orientation different: maybe top-right is rotated 90° counterclockwise? Let's compute R270 (or 90 ccw). R270 (or 90 ccw) = old[j][n-1-i]. Compute R270: i=0 row: j0 => old[0][3]=A j1 => old[1][3]=A j2 => old[2][3]=B j3 => old[3][3]=A => A A B A i=1 row: j0 => old[0][2]=B j1 => old[1][2]=B j2 => old[2][2]=A j3 => old[3][2]=B => B B A B i=2 row: j0 => old[0][ ... [8302 chars truncated]
"A general deploys the same battalion formation to hold four quadrants of a fortress—each regiment faces a different gate, but the internal structure of each unit is identical, merely wheeled into position."
120b: k=2
See: A small colored battle map showing the arrangement of troops in a single formation.
Do: Garrison a fortress by placing four copies of the formation into its four quadrants. Each copy is wheeled to face a different cardinal wall, so the same tactical shape guards every approach.
Grid: The fortress map is twice the span of one formation in each direction. Four identical regiments, each rotated to a different heading, tile the interior perfectly.
We need to infer rule. Input is a small grid (n x n). Output is larger grid (2n x 2n?) Let's see example1: Input size? Provided as 4x4? Let's count rows: "Y W B A" etc 4 rows, each 4 columns. Output appears 8x8? Let's count rows: there are 8 rows, each 8 columns. Yes output is 8x8, double dimensions. Similarly example2 input 4x4, output 8x8. So rule: take input pattern and place four rotated copies into quadrants of output. Rotations: each copy rotated to face a different cardinal wall (north, east, south, west). Likely quadrants: top-left (original orientation), top-right (rotated 90° clockwise), bottom-left (rotated 90° counterclockwise), bottom-right (rotated 180°). Or maybe other arrangement. Let's test with example1 to deduce mapping. Let input matrix A (4x4). Let's label coordinates (r,c) 0-index. Input1: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A Now output 8x8. Let's split into quadrants each 4x4. Top-left quadrant (rows0-3, cols0-3) of output: Rows0-3, cols0-3: Row0: Y W B A Row1: A Y B A Row2: Y A A B Row3: B B B A That matches original exactly. Good. Top-right quadrant (rows0-3, cols4-7): Rows0-3, cols4-7: Row0: A A B A Row1: B B A B Row2: W Y A B Row3: Y A Y B Let's compute what transformation yields that. Possibly rotate 90° clockwise of original? Let's compute original rotated 90° clockwise: new matrix size 4x4 where new[r][c] = original[3-c][r]. Let's compute: Original: [0] Y W B A [1] A Y B A [2] Y A A B [3] B B B A Clockwise rotation: Row0: from original row3 col0..3? Actually formula: new row0 = original row3 reversed? Wait compute: new[0][0]=orig[3][0]=B; new[0][1]=orig[2][0]=Y; new[0][2]=orig[1][0]=A; new[0][3]=orig[0][0]=Y => row0: B Y A Y. Not matching top-right row0 (A A B A). So not that. Maybe rotate 90° counterclockwise? Compute new[0][0]=orig[0][3]=A; new[0][1]=orig[1][3]=A; new[0][2]=orig[2][3]=B; new[0][3]=orig[3][3]=A => row0: A A B A matches top-right row0! Good. So top-right quadrant is original rotated 90° counterclockwise. Check row1 of top-right: should be rotation result row1: new[1][0]=orig[0][2]=B; new[1][1]=orig[1][2]=B; new[1][2]=orig[2][2]=A; new[1][3]=orig[3][2]=B => B B A B matches output row1 top-right: B B A B yes. Row2: new[2][0]=orig[0][1]=W; new[2][1]=orig[1][1]=Y; new[2][2]=orig[2][1]=A; new[2][3]=orig[3][1]=B => W Y A B matches output row2 top-right: W Y A B yes. Row3: new[3][0]=orig[0][0]=Y; new[3][1]=orig[1][0]=A; new[3][2]=orig[2][0]=Y; new[3][3]=orig[3][0]=B => Y A Y B matches output row3 top-right: Y A Y B yes. Great. Now bottom-left quadrant (rows4-7, cols0-3): Rows4-7, cols0-3: Row4: A B B B Row5: B A A Y Row6: A B Y A Row7: A B W Y Let's see if that's original rotated 90° clockwise? Compute clockwise rotation earlier gave row0 B Y A Y etc. Let's compute full clockwise rotated matrix: Clockwise rotation matrix (size 4): Row0: B Y A Y Row1: B A Y A Row2: B B A W Row3: A B B A But bottom-left rows are: Row ... [7902 chars truncated]
"A stage manager blocks the same scene four times on a revolving stage—each time the platform turns, the audience sees the identical tableau from a new angle, and all four frozen moments are captured in a single panoramic photograph."
120b: k=1
See: A small square stage with colored actors frozen in a tableau.
Do: Photograph four performances of the same tableau, each taken after the revolving stage has turned another quarter-rotation. Arrange the four photographs into a grid to create one composite panorama.
Grid: The panoramic image is twice the height and width of a single stage shot. Each quadrant holds one rotation of the tableau, and together they fill the composite without overlap or gaps.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid, output is larger (twice height and width). The description: take four rotations (quarter rotations) of the input tableau, arrange into quadrants to form composite panorama. So output is 2x size, each quadrant is a rotated version of input? Let's test with example. Example 1 Input is 4x4. Output is 8x8. Let's compute rotations: original (0°), 90°, 180°, 270°? Need to place them in quadrants: maybe top-left original, top-right rotated 90°, bottom-left rotated 270°, bottom-right rotated 180°, etc. Let's test with given output. I'll label input matrix I (rows): r0: Y W B A r1: A Y B A r2: Y A A B r3: B B B A Now compute 90° clockwise rotation: rotate matrix: new rows = columns reversed. Let's compute: 90° cw matrix R90 (size 4x4): col0 from bottom to top: B, Y, A, Y -> row0: B Y A Y col1: B, A, Y, W -> row1: B A Y W col2: B, A, B, B -> row2: B A B B col3: A, A, A, A -> row3: A A A A Now 180° rotation (or 90° twice) = rotate original 180: flip both axes. Compute: rows reversed and each row reversed. Original rows reversed: r3 B B B A, r2 Y A A B, r1 A Y B A, r0 Y W B A. Then reverse each row: r3 reversed: A B B B r2 reversed: B A A Y r1 reversed: A B Y A r0 reversed: A B W Y So R180: row0: A B B B row1: B A A Y row2: A B Y A row3: A B W Y Now 270° cw (or 90° ccw) rotation: compute from original: columns from top to bottom reversed order? Let's compute 270° cw = 90° ccw. Equivalent to rotate original 90° ccw: new rows are columns from left to right, each column taken top to bottom? Actually 90° ccw: row0 = col3 top to bottom, row1 = col2 top to bottom, etc. Let's compute: col3 values top to bottom: A, A, B, A -> row0: A A B A col2: B, B, A, B -> row1: B B A B col1: W, Y, A, B -> row2: W Y A B col0: Y, A, Y, B -> row3: Y A Y B Now we need to see how output 8x8 is arranged. Let's split output into quadrants 4x4 each. Output rows (8): 0: Y W B A A A B A 1: A Y B A B B A B 2: Y A A B W Y A B 3: B B B A Y A Y B 4: A B B B B Y A Y 5: B A A Y B A Y W 6: A B Y A B A B B 7: A B W Y A B A A Now quadrants: Top-left (rows0-3, cols0-3): [0,0-3] rows0-3 cols0-3: row0: Y W B A row1: A Y B A row2: Y A A B row3: B B B A That's exactly original input! Good. Top-right (rows0-3, cols4-7): rows0-3, cols4-7: row0 cols4-7: A A B A row1: B B A B row2: W Y A B row3: Y A Y B So matrix: A A B A B B A B W Y A B Y A Y B Compare with our rotations. Which rotation matches? Let's compare with R90 we computed: R90: B Y A Y B A Y W B A B B A A A A Not match. R180: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y Not match. R270: A A B A B B A B W Y A B Y A Y B That matches exactly! So top-right quadrant is 270° cw (or 90° ccw) rotation. Bottom-left quadrant (rows4-7, cols0-3): Rows4-7, cols0-3: row4: A B B B row5: B A A Y row6: A B Y A row7: A B W Y Matrix: A B B B B A A Y A B Y A A B W Y That matches R180 (we computed). Yes. Bottom ... [5095 chars truncated]
"A gardener takes a single planting grid and sows it into four raised beds, turning the template a quarter-turn for each bed so the same floral pattern blooms in every cardinal direction."
120b: k=1
See: A small square planting plan with colored markers for different flower varieties.
Do: Lay out a garden twice the size by filling four adjacent beds. Each bed follows the same planting plan but rotated so the rows that once ran east-west now run north-south, and so on for each successive bed.
Grid: The full garden is a 2×2 arrangement of beds, each the same size as the original plan. Every bed is a rotated copy, and together they tile the plot completely.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid, output is larger (twice size in each dimension? Example1 input size? Let's count. Input grid lines: "Y W B A" => 4 columns. 4 rows. So 4x4 input. Output appears 8x8 (since 2x2 arrangement of rotated copies). Indeed output lines: first line "Y W B A A A B A" => 8 columns. 8 rows total. So rule: take input grid, create 2x2 tiling where each tile is a rotated version of original: top-left is original? Let's see. Output top-left 4x4 should match input? Compare first 4 columns of first 4 rows. Output rows 1-4, cols1-4: Row1: Y W B A Row2: A Y B A Row3: Y A A B Row4: B B B A That matches input exactly. Good. So top-left tile is original. Top-right tile (rows1-4, cols5-8) should be rotated? According to description: "rotated so the rows that once ran east-west now run north-south, and so on for each successive bed." Likely each tile is rotated 90 degrees clockwise relative to previous? Let's examine top-right tile: rows1-4, cols5-8: Row1 cols5-8: A A B A Row2: B B A B Row3: W Y A B Row4: Y A Y B We need to see if this is original rotated 90° clockwise. Let's compute original 4x4 matrix: [ [Y,W,B,A], [A,Y,B,A], [Y,A,A,B], [B,B,B,A] ] Rotate 90° clockwise => new matrix where element (i,j) becomes original (n-1-j,i). Let's compute quickly: result rows: Row0: B, Y, Y, Y? Wait compute: For each column of original from bottom to top become rows. Let's do manually: Original columns: col0: Y, A, Y, B col1: W, Y, A, B col2: B, B, A, B col3: A, A, B, A Clockwise rotation: new row0 = column0 reversed? Actually 90° clockwise: new row0 = original row3 reversed? Let's compute using python mental: Rotated matrix = transpose then reverse each row. Transpose of original: [ [Y, A, Y, B], [W, Y, A, B], [B, B, A, B], [A, A, B, A] ] Now reverse each row (i.e., reverse order of columns) to get clockwise rotation: Row0 reversed: [B, Y, A, Y]? Wait row0 is [Y, A, Y, B]; reversed => [B, Y, A, Y] Row1: [W, Y, A, B] reversed => [B, A, Y, W] Row2: [B, B, A, B] reversed => [B, A, B, B] Row3: [A, A, B, A] reversed => [A, B, A, A] So rotated 90° clockwise matrix: [ [B, Y, A, Y], [B, A, Y, W], [B, A, B, B], [A, B, A, A] ] Now compare to top-right tile we observed: Rows: 1: A A B A 2: B B A B 3: W Y A B 4: Y A Y B Not matching. Maybe rotation is 90° counterclockwise? Let's compute CCW: transpose then reverse columns (i.e., reverse order of rows). Transpose we have above. Reverse order of rows: Rows reversed order: row3, row2, row1, row0: [ [A, A, B, A], [B, B, A, B], [W, Y, A, B], [Y, A, Y, B] ] That matches exactly top-right tile! Yes! So top-right tile is original rotated 90° counterclockwise (or 270° clockwise). Good. Now bottom-left tile (rows5-8, cols1-4) should be rotated 180°? Let's check. Output rows5-8, cols1-4: Row5: A B B B Row6: B A A Y Row7: A B Y A Row8: A B W Y Let's compute 180° rotation of original: reverse both rows ... [6474 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 9×9 grid divided into four quadrants by a horizontal row and a vertical column of azure (A) cells that form a cross. One of the four quadrants (6×6) contains a pattern made of green (G) cells on a black (.) background. An adjacent quadrant (2×2, tucked into the corner next to the A-cross) contains exactly four colored cells arranged in a 2×2 block — these are the color key. The remaining two quadrants are empty (all black).
Do: 1. Locate the row and column of A cells; they intersect to divide the grid into four quadrants. 2. Identify the 6×6 quadrant containing the green pattern and the 2×2 quadrant containing the color key. 3. Determine the spatial relationship between the key quadrant and the pattern quadrant: the 2×2 key maps onto the four 3×3 sub-blocks of the 6×6 pattern based on their relative positions (top-left key cell maps to the top-left 3×3 block, top-right key cell to the top-right 3×3 block, bottom-left key cell to the bottom-left 3×3 block, bottom-right key cell to the bottom-right 3×3 block). 4. Produce a 6×6 output grid: for each 3×3 block of the green pattern, replace every green (G) cell with the color from the corresponding position in the 2×2 key, and keep every black (.) cell as black.
Grid: The input grid is always 9×9. The output grid is always 6×6 — it contains only the recolored pattern with no azure dividers. The background color is black (.). The 2×2 color key can appear in any of the three non-pattern quadrants (its exact corner varies across instances), and the green pattern can occupy any of the four quadrants, but it is always the 6×6 one.
"A stained-glass window reveals its true colors when sunlight passes through a prism."
120b: k=2
See: An azure cross divides the world like the leading of a cathedral window, separating four panes. One large pane holds a pattern traced in plain green glass — a design waiting to be illuminated. Tucked into a nearby corner, a tiny 2×2 prism glows with four jewel-toned colors, each one a secret instruction. The remaining panes are dark, as if the light hasn't reached them yet.
Do: The prism catches the light and casts it onto the green glass. Each of the prism's four facets shines toward the quadrant of the pattern that mirrors its own position — upper-left facet illuminates the upper-left quarter, and so on. Wherever the green glass stands, it absorbs the color of the light falling on it, transforming from plain green into the jewel tone of its corresponding facet. Wherever there is only darkness, no light takes hold. Strip away the leading — the azure framework was only ever scaffolding — and what remains is the stained-glass window in full color.
Grid: The cathedral window is always 9×9 before the leading is removed. The finished stained-glass panel is always 6×6 — the illuminated design without its frame. The darkness is black (.). The prism may sit in any dark corner adjacent to the leading, and the green tracery may fill any of the four panes, but it always occupies the large one.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid 9x9 with azure leading cross? In examples, there is a column and row of A (azure) forming cross dividing into four quadrants. The large pane contains green pattern (G). The small 2x2 prism of four colors (different from green and azure) located in a corner adjacent to the leading (i.e., in one of the quadrants, at corner). The prism is 2x2 block of distinct colors (e.g., in example1: top-left quadrant? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid (9x9). Let's layout rows: Row1: . . . . . . A B R Row2: . . . . . . A Y B Row3: A A A A A A A A A Row4: . . G G . G A . . Row5: G G . . . . A . . Row6: G G . G . G A . . Row7: . . . . G . A . . Row8: G G G G G G A . . Row9: . . . . G . A . . We see column 7 (index 7?) Actually A's column at col7? Let's index 1-9. Row1 col7 = A, col8 = B, col9 = R. Row2 col7 = A, col8 = Y, col9 = B. Row3 all A across. So cross: vertical line of A at column7 (col7) and horizontal line of A at row3 (row3). That divides into four quadrants: top-left (rows1-2, cols1-6), top-right (rows1-2, cols8-9), bottom-left (rows4-9, cols1-6), bottom-right (rows4-9, cols8-9). The large pane holds green pattern: appears in bottom-left quadrant (rows4-9, cols1-6) there are G's forming shape. Indeed. The prism is a 2x2 block of colors in top-right quadrant? Let's see top-right quadrant rows1-2, cols8-9: we have (row1 col8 B, col9 R; row2 col8 Y, col9 B). That's a 2x2 block with colors B,R,Y,B (not all distinct). But description says four jewel-toned colors each one a secret instruction. In example1, the colors are B,R,Y,B (B repeats). Hmm maybe the prism is not necessarily all distinct; but each facet corresponds to quadrant: upper-left facet illuminates upper-left quarter, etc. So the prism's positions correspond to quadrants: top-left facet (row1 col8?) Wait orientation: The prism sits in a corner adjacent to the leading. In example1, the prism is in top-right corner (adjacent to both the vertical and horizontal A lines). The 2x2 block occupies rows1-2, cols8-9. Its four cells correspond to quadrants: upper-left cell of prism (row1 col8) corresponds to upper-left quadrant (top-left). Upper-right cell (row1 col9) corresponds to upper-right quadrant. Lower-left cell (row2 col8) corresponds to lower-left quadrant. Lower-right cell (row2 col9) corresponds to lower-right quadrant. That matches "upper-left facet illuminates the upper-left quarter, and so on." Now transformation: For each quadrant, wherever there is green G in the large pane, replace it with the color of the corresponding prism cell. If there is no green (i.e., black .) remain black. Also maybe other colors (non-green) become something? In output example1, we see output 6x6 (after removing leading cross). Let's compute. First, we need to extract the 6x6 region that is the large pane (the quadrant with green). In example1, large pane is bottom-left quadrant (rows4-9, cols1-6). That's 6 rows (4-9) and 6 columns (1-6). Indeed output is 6x6. Now ... [9034 chars truncated]
"A single stem cell divides along two axes, and the daughter cells inherit different gene expressions depending on which quadrant of the embryo they settle in."
120b: k=2
See: A cellular membrane of azure divides the organism into chambers. One large chamber holds a skeleton of green tissue. A tiny cluster of four specialized cells waits in a neighboring pocket, each carrying a unique pigment.
Do: The pigment cells colonize the skeleton, each claiming the quarter of the body nearest to its origin. Wherever green tissue exists, it absorbs the pigment of its nearest colonizer. The membrane dissolves, leaving only the transformed body.
Grid: The embryo shrinks to just the skeleton — no membrane, no empty chambers. Each quarter of the skeleton now displays the color of the pigment cell that claimed it.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colors. Input includes a membrane (azure A) dividing chambers. The description: "cellular membrane of azure divides the organism into chambers. One large chamber holds a skeleton of green tissue. A tiny cluster of four specialized cells waits in a neighboring pocket, each carrying a unique pigment." In examples, there is a region of A forming a vertical line? Let's examine Example1 input. I'll rewrite as matrix coordinates. Example1 Input (9x9?). Provided lines: Row1: . . . . . . A B R Row2: . . . . . . A Y B Row3: A A A A A A A A A Row4: . . G G . G A . . Row5: G G . . . . A . . Row6: G G . G . G A . . Row7: . . . . G . A . . Row8: G G G G G G A . . Row9: . . . . G . A . . So A forms a vertical line column 7 (0-index?). Actually column 7 (1-index) is A in many rows, plus row3 is all A across entire row. So membrane: a full row of A across row3, and a column of A from row1-9 at column7, forming a cross dividing grid into four quadrants? Yes. Green tissue (G) appears in lower left quadrant (below row3 and left of column7). Also some G above? Actually rows4-9 left side have G clusters. The "tiny cluster of four specialized cells" each with unique pigment: In input we have B, R, Y, maybe also something else? In example1, we have B at (1,8) (row1 col8), R at (1,9), Y at (2,8), B at (2,9). That's four cells: B,R,Y,B? Actually two B's. Hmm maybe the four specialized cells are B,R,Y,? maybe also something else not present? In example2, we have R,Y,M,B? Let's see. Example2 Input: Row1: R Y A . . . . . . Row2: B M A . . . . . . Row3: A A A A A A A A A Row4: . . A . G . . G . Row5: . . A G G G G G G Row6: . . A . G . . G . Row7: . . A . G . . G . Row8: . . A G G G G G G Row9: . . A . G . . G . Here A column at col3? Actually column3 is A in rows1-9, plus row3 all A across. So same cross shape. The four specialized cells are at top left quadrant: positions (1,1)=R, (1,2)=Y, (2,1)=B, (2,2)=M. So four distinct colors: R,Y,B,M. Thus the rule: The four pigment cells are located in the top-left quadrant (above membrane row and left of membrane column). They colonize the green skeleton (G) in the bottom-left quadrant (below membrane row, left of column). Each colonizer claims the quarter of the body nearest to its origin. So we need to partition the green region into four quadrants relative to the four pigment cells? Actually "each claiming the quarter of the body nearest to its origin." The body is the skeleton (green tissue). The four pigment cells are at positions forming a 2x2 block? In example2 they are at (1,1) R, (1,2) Y, (2,1) B, (2,2) M. So they are arranged in a 2x2 square. The green skeleton occupies lower-left quadrant (rows4-9, cols1-? Actually left of column3). That's a region of size maybe 6 rows x 2 columns? Wait left of column3 includes columns1-2. Indeed green cells are in columns1-2? Let's see rows4-9: row4 col1 '.' col2 '.' col3 A col4 '.' col5 G col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 G col9 '. ... [11135 chars truncated]
"A nebula bisected by dark dust lanes reveals four quadrants of stars, each quadrant ionized to a different glow by the nearest stellar remnant."
120b: k=3
See: Azure dust lanes form a cross through the nebula. One large region holds a constellation of green gas clouds. In a small cluster nearby, four differently colored stellar remnants sit in a tight square.
Do: Each remnant ionizes the nearest quarter of the gas clouds. Green gas adopts the remnant's emission color. Voids remain dark. The dust lanes dissipate.
Grid: The nebula resolves to just the gas clouds — four quadrants each glowing a different color, voids black, no dust lanes.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids 9x9? Example1 input appears 9x9. Output appears 6x6? Actually output lines: first line ". . B R . R" that's 6 columns. So output size reduced? Let's examine pattern: In description: "dust lanes dissipate. Grid resolves to just the gas clouds — four quadrants each glowing a different color, voids black, no dust lanes." So output is 4 quadrants each colored based on nearest remnant (colored squares). The input includes azure dust lanes forming a cross (A column?) and a large region holds a constellation of green gas clouds (G region). In a small cluster nearby, four differently colored stellar remnants sit in a tight square. So there are four colored cells (maybe B,R,Y,M etc) forming a 2x2 block near the gas region. They ionize nearest quarter of gas clouds, turning them that color. Voids remain black. Dust lanes (A) disappear. Thus transformation: Identify a contiguous region of G (green) maybe shape irregular. Identify a 2x2 block of non-A colored cells (different colors) near it. For each of the four quadrants of the G region (split by its bounding box center?) assign each quadrant the color of the nearest remnant (one of the four). Then output a smaller grid containing only the region of G transformed into colored quadrants, with black elsewhere, and no A. Let's test with Example1. Input1: Let's map coordinates. 9x9. Row0: . . . . . . A B R Row1: . . . . . . A Y B Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: . . G G . G A . . Row4: G G . . . . A . . Row5: G G . G . G A . . Row6: . . . . G . A . . Row7: G G G G G G A . . Row8: . . . . G . A . . We see A column at col6 (0-index). That's dust lane vertical line. Also row2 all A horizontal line. So cross of A. The green region is left of the cross (columns 0-5) maybe irregular shape. The colored remnants are at top right of cross: B,R,Y,B etc? Actually near cross there are B,R,Y,B in top right area (col7,8). Those four cells maybe form a 2x2 block? Let's see positions: Row0 col7 B, col8 R. Row1 col7 Y, col8 B. That's a 2x2 block of colors B,R,Y,B (two B). So four differently colored? Not all different but okay. Now output is 6x6 grid. Let's see output rows: Row0: . . B R . R Row1: B B . . . . Row2: B B . R . R Row3: . . . . B . Row4: Y Y Y B B B Row5: . . . . B . So output seems to be region of green transformed into colors B,R,Y etc. Let's map original green shape coordinates relative to something. The output size 6x6 maybe corresponds to bounding box of green region (excluding A cross). Let's compute bounding box of G cells in input: rows 3-8, cols 0-5? Actually G appear columns up to 5 (col5 maybe). Row3: cols2,3,5. Row4: cols0,1. Row5: cols0,1,3,5. Row6: col4. Row7: cols0-5 all G. Row8: col4. So bounding box rows3-8 (6 rows) and cols0-5 (6 cols). Yes output is 6x6. So output corresponds to that bounding box, with A removed (since cross at col6). Good. Now transformation: For each cell in that bounding box that was G, assign a co ... [8411 chars truncated]
"A sea chart divided by shipping lanes reveals four fishing grounds, each school of fish taking on the color of the nearest lighthouse beacon."
120b: k=1
See: Azure shipping lanes form a cross on the chart. One large area holds a pattern of green fish shoals. In a small harbor nearby, four differently colored lighthouse beacons are arranged in a square.
Do: Each beacon illuminates the nearest quarter of the shoals. Green fish in that zone reflect the beacon's color. Empty water stays dark. The shipping lanes are erased from the chart.
Grid: The chart shows only the fishing grounds — four quarters of shoals each colored by their beacon, open water black, no lanes.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Let's map. Example1 Input grid (9x9). Let's write coordinates. I'll parse. Row1: ". . . . . . A B R" Row2: ". . . . . . A Y B" Row3: "A A A A A A A A A" Row4: ". . G G . G A . ." Row5: "G G . . . . A . ." Row6: "G G . G . G A . ." Row7: ". . . . G . A . ." Row8: "G G G G G G A . ." Row9: ". . . . G . A . ." Output grid (6x6?) Actually output rows: Row1: ". . B R . R" Row2: "B B . . . ." Row3: "B B . R . R" Row4: ". . . . B ." Row5: "Y Y Y B B B" Row6: ". . . . B ." That's 6 columns, 6 rows. So transformation reduces size? Possibly cropping to region of interest (shoals) after removing lanes (azure A column?). In description: shipping lanes are azure (A) forming a cross. In input, there is a vertical line of A in column 7 (index 7) across many rows, and a horizontal line of A in row3 (all A). That's a cross. The lanes are erased in output. So we remove the cross (both row and column) and keep remaining quadrants (four quarters) each colored according to nearest beacon. Beacons: four differently colored lighthouse beacons arranged in a square near a small harbor. In input, there are colored cells B,R,Y,O? In example1, we have B,R,Y maybe? Let's locate beacons: In input, near bottom right? Row1 col8 B, col9 R. Row2 col8 Y, col9 B. Row8 col8 .? Actually row8 col8 . row8 col9 . Row9 col8 . col9 . So beacons are a 2x2 block at top right? Actually rows1-2, cols8-9: pattern: Row1: col8 B, col9 R Row2: col8 Y, col9 B That's a 2x2 square of beacons: B,R,Y,B (maybe O elsewhere). In output, we see colors B,R,Y appear in quadrants. The rule: For each quadrant defined by the cross (vertical A column and horizontal A row), we fill with the color of the nearest beacon (the one in that quadrant). The original green fish (G) become that color. Empty water (.) stays black (.)? In output, we see '.' for empty water. Also the cross removed. Let's test: Quadrant top-left (above row3 and left of col7) contains G's and . . . In output, top-left quadrant becomes B? Let's see output rows correspond to original quadrants after removing cross. Need to map. Original grid size 9x9. Remove row3 (all A) and column7 (A). That leaves 8 rows (since row3 removed) and 8 columns (col7 removed). But output is 6x6, not 8x8. Wait maybe also remove rows/cols that are empty? Let's compute: After removing cross, we have four quadrants each of size? The cross splits grid into four quadrants: top-left rows1-2, cols1-6 (since before column7). That's 2 rows x6 cols = 12 cells. Top-right rows1-2, cols8-9 (since after column7). That's 2x2 =4 cells. Bottom-left rows4-9 (excluding row3) rows4-9 =6 rows, cols1-6 =6x6 =36 cells. Bottom-right rows4-9, cols8-9 =6x2 =12 cells. But output is 6x6, maybe they only output bottom-left quadrant? Not. Let's examine output content: Row1 ". . B R . R" length6. Row1 corresponds maybe to top-left quadrant after transformation? Contains B,R colors. In top-left quadrant original had only '.' and maybe G? ... [9964 chars truncated]
"A circuit board's bus lines carry four different voltage signals, and each chip region on the board lights up in the color of the signal reaching it."
120b: k=1
See: Azure bus traces form a cross on the PCB. One large chip area holds a pattern of green active nodes. In a small component nearby, four differently colored voltage sources are arranged in a square.
Do: Each voltage source powers the nearest quarter of the chip. Active green nodes in that zone light up in the source's color. Inactive pads stay dark. The bus traces are etched away.
Grid: The output shows only the chip — four powered quarters each glowing a different signal color, inactive pads black, no bus traces.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9? Let's map. Example1 Input grid (9x9). Output grid appears 6x6? Actually output lines: 6 rows, each with 6 entries. So transformation reduces size? Let's examine. Input example1: Row1: . . . . . . A B R Row2: . . . . . . A Y B Row3: A A A A A A A A A Row4: . . G G . G A . . Row5: G G . . . . A . . Row6: G G . G . G A . . Row7: . . . . G . A . . Row8: G G G G G G A . . Row9: . . . . G . A . . Output example1 rows (6x6): Row1: . . B R . R Row2: B B . . . . Row3: B B . R . R Row4: . . . . B . Row5: Y Y Y B B B Row6: . . . . B . We need to see mapping: The description: Azure bus traces form a cross on PCB. Large chip area holds pattern of green active nodes. Small component nearby, four differently colored voltage sources arranged in a square. Each voltage source powers nearest quarter of chip. Active green nodes in that zone light up in source's color. Inactive pads stay dark. Bus traces are etched away. Output shows only chip — four powered quarters each glowing a different signal color, inactive pads black, no bus traces. Interpretation: Input grid contains azure 'A' forming cross (bus traces). Also green 'G' pattern inside chip area (maybe shape). Also four colored sources (B,R,Y,O?) arranged in a square near component. In example, sources are B,R,Y? Let's locate in input: At top right area there are A B R in row1 col7-9, A Y B row2 col7-9. So a 2x2 block of colored cells? Actually pattern: positions (row1,col8)=B, (row1,col9)=R, (row2,col8)=Y, (row2,col9)=B. That's a 2x2 square of colors (B,R;Y,B). That's four sources? Colors: B,R,Y,B (two blues). Hmm maybe the four sources are B,R,Y,O but O not present. In output we see colors B,R,Y appear. The chip area: maybe the region of green G's (active nodes) within the cross of A's? The cross of A's is column 7? Actually column7 is all A's (vertical bus). Row3 is all A's (horizontal bus). So cross at row3 and column7. The chip area maybe the region of G's that is contiguous and maybe bounded by A's? In input, G's are in left side of grid (columns 1-6). They form some shape. The rule: For each quarter of chip (relative to cross), assign a source color based on nearest source (distance). Then replace G's in that quarter with that source color, while other cells become black (.)? Also remove A's (bus traces) and other colors become maybe remain? In output, we see only B,R,Y colors and . . No A, no G. So yes. Let's test: Determine quarters: The cross divides grid into four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right relative to intersection (row3, col7). The sources are located near the chip? In example, sources are at top-right area (rows1-2, cols8-9). That's top-right quadrant? Actually those coordinates are above row3 and right of col7, so top-right quadrant. But there are four sources arranged in a square; maybe each source corresponds to a quadrant: top-left source at (row1,col8?) Not sure. But output shows colors distribu ... [9985 chars truncated]
"Four elemental gods, each seated at a corner shrine, claim dominion over the nearest quarter of a sacred grove, transforming its foliage to their own essence."
120b: k=1
See: Azure sacred rivers form a cross through the realm. One large quarter holds a grove of green life. In a small shrine nearby, four gods of different colors sit in a square.
Do: Each god's essence flows into the nearest quarter of the grove. Green foliage touched by a god transforms to that god's color. Clearings remain void. The rivers dry up.
Grid: Only the grove remains — four domains each bearing a different god's color, clearings left black, no rivers.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's parse. We have input grid 9x9? Example 1 input lines: ". . . . . . A B R" ". . . . . . A Y B" "A A A A A A A A A" ". . G G . G A . ." "G G . . . . A . ." "G G . G . G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." "G G G G G G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." That's 9 rows, 9 columns. Output grid lines: ". . B R . R" "B B . . . ." "B B . R . R" ". . . . B ." "Y Y Y B B B" ". . . . B ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns? Let's count columns: first row ". . B R . R" =6. So output is 6x6. So transformation reduces size? Possibly cropping to region of interest (grove). The description: Azure sacred rivers form a cross through the realm. One large quarter holds a grove of green life. In a small shrine nearby, four gods of different colors sit in a square. Each god's essence flows into the nearest quarter of the grove. Green foliage touched by a god transforms to that god's color. Clearings remain void. The rivers dry up. Grid details: Only the grove remains — four domains each bearing a different god's color, clearings left black, no rivers. Interpretation: Input contains azure (A) lines forming cross (vertical and horizontal). Green (G) region (grove) in one quarter (maybe bottom-left?). Four gods of different colors (B,R,Y,O?) sit in a square near the shrine (maybe near center). They flow into nearest quarter of the grove, recoloring green cells accordingly. Output only includes the grove region (cropped) with recolored cells, black for empty (clearings). No azure rivers. Let's examine example to map. Input: Let's map coordinates (row, col 0-8). I'll write grid. Row0: . . . . . . A B R Row1: . . . . . . A Y B Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: . . G G . G A . . Row4: G G . . . . A . . Row5: G G . G . G A . . Row6: . . . . G . A . . Row7: G G G G G G A . . Row8: . . . . G . A . . Observations: Azure column at col6 (index6) vertical line of A's from row0 to row8. Also row2 is all A's across (horizontal). So cross of azure. Green region appears left of column6 (west side) maybe bottom-left quadrant? Let's list green cells coordinates: Row3 col2,3,5? Actually row3: ". . G G . G A . ." => col2 G, col3 G, col5 G. Row4: "G G . . . . A . ." => col0 G, col1 G. Row5: "G G . G . G A . ." => col0 G, col1 G, col3 G, col5 G. Row6: ". . . . G . A . ." => col4 G. Row7: "G G G G G G A . ." => col0-5 all G. Row8: ". . . . G . A . ." => col4 G. So green area is a shape roughly left of column6, spanning rows3-8, columns0-5. Now gods: colors B,R,Y,O? In input we have B at (0,7) and (1,8) etc. Let's locate colored cells not A or G or .: Row0 col7 B, col8 R. Row1 col7 Y, col8 B. Row7 col7 .? Actually row7 col7 . (since after A). Row8 col7 .? Row8 col7 . . Row? Also there is O maybe not in example 1. Not present. So four gods maybe B,R,Y,? maybe O not present. In example 1 we have B,R,Y maybe also something else? Let's see other colors: maybe there is also something else elsewhere but not. Positions: B at (0,7) R at (0,8) Y at ( ... [10120 chars truncated]
"A ballroom floor is divided by ribbon barriers, and four lead dancers each lend their sash color to every partner in their nearest quadrant of the formation."
120b: k=2
See: Azure ribbons form a cross on the ballroom floor. One large section holds a formation of green dancers. In a small alcove nearby, four leads wearing different colored sashes stand in a square.
Do: Each lead claims the nearest quarter of the formation. Every green dancer in that zone dons the lead's sash color. Empty floor stays open. The ribbons are untied.
Grid: The formation alone remains — four quadrants of dancers each wearing a different sash color, open floor black, no ribbons.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with azure ribbons forming a cross? In inputs, there is a column of A (azure) across? In example1 input: 9x9? Let's view. Example1 Input rows: 1: . . . . . . A B R 2: . . . . . . A Y B 3: A A A A A A A A A 4: . . G G . G A . . 5: G G . . . . A . . 6: G G . G . G A . . 7: . . . . G . A . . 8: G G G G G G A . . 9: . . . . G . A . . So there is a vertical line of A in column7 (index7) across rows1-9, plus row3 all A across. That's a cross of azure ribbons. Green dancers region: cluster of G in lower left area? Also some G in other places. Four leads wearing different colored sashes stand in a square: likely the 2x2 block of non-A colors near top right? In input, we have B,R,Y,B etc near top right: positions (row1 col8 B, col9 R), (row2 col8 Y, col9 B). That's a 2x2 square of B,R,Y,B (different colors). Those are leads. Goal: each lead claims nearest quarter of formation (green region). Every green dancer in that zone dons lead's sash color. Empty floor stays black. Ribbons untied (remove A cross). Output shows only colored quadrants and black elsewhere. Let's see output example1: 6x6? Actually output rows 6? Provided: Row1: . . B R . R Row2: B B . . . . Row3: B B . R . R Row4: . . . . B . Row5: Y Y Y B B B Row6: . . . . B . Dimensions maybe 6x6? Let's map coordinates. Need to see mapping from original region of greens (maybe shape) to output quadrants. Let's extract green region coordinates in input1. Let's index rows1-9, cols1-9. List G positions: Row4 col3,4,6 Row5 col1,2 Row6 col1,2,4,6 Row7 col5 Row8 col1-6 all G Row9 col5 Also row4 col? there is G at col5? Actually row4: ". . G G . G A . ." => G at col3,4,6. Row5: "G G . . . . A . ." => G at col1,2. Row6: "G G . G . G A . ." => G at col1,2,4,6. Row7: ". . . . G . A . ." => G at col5. Row8: "G G G G G G A . ." => G at col1-6. Row9: ". . . . G . A . ." => G at col5. So shape roughly like a blob. Now leads positions: 2x2 block at rows1-2, cols8-9: (1,8)=B, (1,9)=R, (2,8)=Y, (2,9)=B. Now output grid seems to be 6x6 with colors B,R,Y etc placed where green were, but transformed. Let's map output coordinates maybe correspond to original green region after removing A cross and cropping to bounding box of greens? Let's compute bounding box of greens: rows4-8? Actually min row =4, max row=8 (since row9 also G at col5). Wait row9 has G at col5, so max row=9. min col=1, max col=6. So bounding box rows4-9, cols1-6 => size 6 rows (4-9 inclusive =6) and 6 cols (1-6). That matches output size 6x6. Now output rows correspond to that region, with colors assigned based on quadrant nearest lead. We need to assign each green cell to nearest lead (by Euclidean? Manhattan?) and recolor with that lead's color. Leads are at positions outside the region: (1,8) B, (1,9) R, (2,8) Y, (2,9) B. So four leads forming a square. Determine quadrants: top-left lead B at (1,8) maybe claims upper-left quarter of formation (relative ... [9644 chars truncated]
"A landmass split by rift valleys has four mineral veins, each vein staining the nearest quarter of an exposed rock formation with its ore color."
120b: fail
See: Azure rift valleys form a cross through the terrain. One large exposure holds a pattern of green mineral deposits. In a small outcrop nearby, four differently colored ore veins sit in a square.
Do: Each ore vein stains the nearest quarter of the deposit. Green minerals in that zone take on the ore's color. Bare rock stays dark. The rift valleys close.
Grid: Only the deposit remains — four quarters each stained a different ore color, bare rock black, no rifts.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids with many colors. Output seems smaller? Example1 input is 9x9? Let's count rows: given lines: first line ". . . . . . A B R" that's 9 columns. 9 rows. Output lines: first line ". . B R . R" that's 6 columns? Actually output rows have varying lengths? Let's list output example1 rows: ". . B R . R" (6) "B B . . . ." (6) "B B . R . R" (6) ". . . . B ." (6) "Y Y Y B B B" (6) ". . . . B ." (6) So output is 6x6. So transformation reduces size. Input had a central cross of azure (A) maybe representing rift valleys? In description: Azure rift valleys form a cross through terrain. One large exposure holds pattern of green mineral deposits. In a small outcrop nearby, four differently colored ore veins sit in a square. So input includes a cross of A (azure) dividing grid into quadrants. The large exposure (green deposit) maybe a region of G. The four ore veins are colors (B,R,Y,M etc) placed in a square near deposit. The rule: each ore vein stains the nearest quarter of the deposit. Green minerals in that zone take on ore's color. Bare rock stays dark. The rift valleys close. Grid details: Only the deposit remains — four quarters each stained a different ore color, bare rock black, no rifts. Thus output is a cropped region containing only the deposit area (the green region) after being recolored by nearest ore color per quarter, and the cross removed (rifts closed). Also black for non-green (bare rock) within deposit area? In output we see B and R etc colors, and '.' for black. Let's examine example1 to map. Input example1: Let's reconstruct grid coordinates. I'll index rows 0-8, cols 0-8. Row0: . . . . . . A B R Row1: . . . . . . A Y B Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: . . G G . G A . . Row4: G G . . . . A . . Row5: G G . G . G A . . Row6: . . . . G . A . . Row7: G G G G G G A . . Row8: . . . . G . A . . We see a vertical line of A at column6 (0-index). Also a horizontal line of A at row2 (full row). That's the cross. Green deposit region appears to be left of the vertical A line and below the horizontal A line? Actually deposit is a shape of G's maybe forming a region left of column6 and below row2? Let's see G positions: rows3-8, columns0-5 maybe. Indeed many G's left side. Four ore veins: colors B,R,Y maybe placed near deposit? In input we have B,R at top right of cross (row0 col7 B, col8 R). Y at row1 col7 B? Wait row1 col7 B? Actually row1: ". . . . . . A Y B" so Y at col7, B at col8. Also maybe other colors elsewhere? Not in this example. So the four ore colors maybe B,R,Y,? Actually we have B,R,Y maybe plus something else? In this example only three ore colors appear? But output shows B and R and Y. Output grid 6x6 includes B,R,Y. Let's locate deposit region boundaries: The deposit likely is the region of G's (green) that is contiguous and maybe rectangular? Let's map coordinates of G's: Row3: col2 G, col3 G, col5 G Row4: col0 G, col1 G Row5: col0 G, col1 G, col3 G, ... [10770 chars truncated]
"A chef glazes a single pastry lattice using four different icings, each piped from its own corner of the decorating station."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cutting board of azure strips divides the workspace. On one broad section sits a lattice of green dough. Nearby, four tiny wells of colored icing sit in a square arrangement.
Do: Each icing well claims the nearest quarter of the lattice. Wherever dough exists in that quarter, it receives that icing color. The bare gaps between dough strips remain unfrosted. Then the lattice is lifted off the board.
Grid: Only the lattice remains — a six-by-six pastry where each quarter shows its own icing color on the dough, with empty gaps left bare.
"A conductor splits the orchestra into four sections, and each section plays the same melodic phrase but in a different instrument's timbre."
120b: k=1
See: Azure bars divide the score into four parts. One large section holds a rhythmic pattern notated in green. A small cluster of four colored notes sits in an adjacent corner — each a different instrument assignment.
Do: Each colored note assigns its timbre to the nearest quadrant of the green rhythm. The green notes transform into the color of their assigned instrument. Rests stay silent. The score collapses to just the performed passage.
Grid: The output is the rhythm alone — four quadrants of the same pattern, each recolored by its assigned instrument, with silences remaining black.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's parse. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 9x9? Let's count rows: given lines: ". . . . . . A B R" (9) ". . . . . . A Y B" "A A A A A A A A A" ". . G G . G A . ." "G G . . . . A . ." "G G . G . G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." "G G G G G G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." That's 9 rows, 9 columns. Output grid lines: ". . B R . R" "B B . . . ." "B B . R . R" ". . . . B ." "Y Y Y B B B" ". . . . B ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. So transformation reduces size? Possibly collapse to quadrants of green rhythm? Let's analyze. In input, there is a large block of green G forming a shape? Also azure A column? Let's map. Let's create coordinates (row, col). Row0: columns 0-8. A appears at col6 in rows0-1, also row2 all A, rows3-8 col6 A. So column6 is all A (azure). That's the "Azure bars divide the score into four parts." So vertical bar at column6 dividing grid into left and right quadrants? Also maybe horizontal bar? In input, row2 is all A, a horizontal bar dividing top and bottom? Indeed row2 all A. So we have a cross dividing into four quadrants: top-left (rows0-1, cols0-5), top-right (rows0-1, cols7-8), bottom-left (rows3-8, cols0-5), bottom-right (rows3-8, cols7-8). The central cross (row2 and col6) are azure. Now green rhythm pattern appears in quadrants? The description: "One large section holds a rhythmic pattern notated in green." So green cells are the pattern, maybe in bottom-left quadrant? Let's see green positions: rows3-8, columns0-5 have many G. Indeed bottom-left quadrant contains many G forming shape. Also some G in top-left? rows0-1 have none. So pattern is in bottom-left quadrant. "A small cluster of four colored notes sits in an adjacent corner — each a different instrument assignment." That likely refers to four colored notes (B,R,Y,O etc) in top-right quadrant? In example, top-right quadrant (rows0-1, cols7-8) contains: row0 col7 B, col8 R; row1 col7 Y, col8 B. That's four notes: B,R,Y,B (but B repeats). Actually there are B,R,Y,B. Not four distinct colors. But maybe includes also something else? In test input, top-right quadrant has R,B and Y,O etc. In example output, we have 6x6 grid: four quadrants of same pattern, each recolored by its assigned instrument, with silences remaining black. So output is pattern (green) repeated in each quadrant, recolored according to instrument assigned to that quadrant (based on nearest colored note). The silences (black .) remain. Thus we need to identify which instrument (color) is assigned to each quadrant: based on nearest colored note (from the small cluster) to that quadrant. In example, the four colored notes are at positions: (0,7)=B, (0,8)=R, (1,7)=Y, (1,8)=B. Quadrants: top-left (TL) nearest? Probably nearest note is B at (0,7) maybe? Actually TL quadrant is left of column6 and above row2. Its nearest colored note among the four? Distance? Let's compute Manhattan distance from each note to the quadrant region? Might be nearest note ... [8492 chars truncated]
"A playing field is quartered by chalk lines, and each quadrant's team dons its own jersey color over the same formation."
120b: fail
See: Azure chalk lines cross the field, creating quadrants. One large quadrant is populated with green player markers in a formation. A small huddle of four differently colored captains waits in an adjacent corner.
Do: Each captain sends their jersey color into the nearest quarter of the formation. Every green marker in that quarter adopts the captain's color. Empty positions stay vacant. The chalk lines and sidelines vanish.
Grid: Only the formation remains on a clean field — four quarters each wearing a different captain's color, empty spots left bare.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's parse. We have input grid 9x9? Example 1 input lines: ". . . . . . A B R" ". . . . . . A Y B" "A A A A A A A A A" ". . G G . G A . ." "G G . . . . A . ." "G G . G . G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." "G G G G G G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." That's 9 rows, 9 columns. Output: ". . B R . R" "B B . . . ." "B B . R . R" ". . . . B ." "Y Y Y B B B" ". . . . B ." Wait output rows count? Looks like 6 rows, 6 columns? Let's count characters per row: Row1: ". . B R . R" => 6 columns. Row2: "B B . . . ." => 6 Row3: "B B . R . R" =>6 Row4: ". . . . B ." =>6 Row5: "Y Y Y B B B" =>6 Row6: ". . . . B ." =>6 So output is 6x6. So transformation reduces size? Possibly cropping to region containing formation after removing chalk lines (A?) and empty rows/cols. Interpretation: In description, azure chalk lines (A) cross field creating quadrants. One large quadrant populated with green markers (G) in formation. Small huddle of four differently colored captains (B,R,Y,O?) waits in adjacent corner. In example, A forms vertical line? Let's view input: column 7 (index 6) is all A's (since rows have A at column 7). Indeed each row has A at column 7. Also row 3 (index2) is all A's across row? Row3: "A A A A A A A A A" all A. So A forms a cross dividing grid into four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Green formation appears in bottom-left quadrant? Let's see bottom-left area (rows 4-9, cols 1-6). There are G's forming shape. Captains: four differently colored captains in adjacent corner (maybe top-right quadrant). In input, we have B,R,Y at top-right area near A cross: Row1 col8 B, col9 R. Row2 col8 Y, col9 B. Also maybe O elsewhere? Not in example. So rule: Each captain sends its color into nearest quarter of the formation. So we need to assign each quarter (quadrant) a captain color based on nearest captain location. Then every green marker in that quarter becomes that color. Empty positions stay empty. Then remove A lines and empty rows/cols, leaving only colored formation. In example output 6x6 corresponds to the quadrant containing the green formation (bottom-left) after recoloring. Indeed output shows B and R and Y colors replacing G's. Let's map quadrants: The cross divides into four quadrants: top-left (above row3 and left of col7), top-right (above row3, right of col7), bottom-left (below row3, left of col7), bottom-right (below row3, right of col7). The green formation is in bottom-left quadrant (rows 4-9, cols1-6). Captains are in top-right quadrant (rows1-2, cols8-9). But there are also maybe captains in other quadrants? In example only B,R,Y present in top-right. So nearest quarter of formation? The formation is bottom-left; nearest captain? Possibly distance from each green cell to each captain; assign each green cell the color of nearest captain. But output shows mixture of B,R,Y across formation, not uniform. Let's examine output grid mapping to original bottom-left ... [8199 chars truncated]
"A weather front crosses a landscape divided by mountain ridges, and each valley beyond the ridge takes on the climate of whichever wind reaches it first."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Azure mountain ridges form a cross, dividing the land into valleys. One broad valley holds a pattern of green vegetation. In a small sheltered pocket nearby, four different-colored weather systems brew.
Do: Each weather system drifts into the nearest quarter of the vegetated valley. Wherever green growth exists, it changes color to match the arriving climate. Barren ground stays unchanged. The ridges erode away.
Grid: The output shows only the valley — vegetation recolored in four climate zones, barren patches remaining black, no ridges.
"A blueprint's scaffolding is removed, revealing four wings of a building each finished in a different façade material."
120b: k=2
See: Azure scaffolding forms a cross through the blueprint. Behind one large section, a structural framework is sketched in green. In a small alcove nearby, four swatches of colored material are pinned in a square.
Do: Each swatch is applied to the nearest quarter of the framework. Green structural elements adopt that swatch's color; open spaces remain as voids. The scaffolding is then struck from the plans.
Grid: The final blueprint shows only the structure — four wings each clad in a different material color, voids left empty, no scaffolding.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with azure scaffolding (A) forming a cross through blueprint. In examples, A appears as a vertical line? Let's view Example1 input grid 9x9? Actually lines: first row ". . . . . . A B R" etc. So A column at position 7? Let's map coordinates. I'll rewrite Example1 input as matrix with indices (row, col 0-8). Row0: . . . . . . A B R Row1: . . . . . . A Y B Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: . . G G . G A . . Row4: G G . . . . A . . Row5: G G . G . G A . . Row6: . . . . G . A . . Row7: G G G G G G A . . Row8: . . . . G . A . . So A forms a vertical line column6 (0-index) across many rows, plus row2 is all A (horizontal). So cross shape of A (azure scaffolding). Green G forms some shape behind (maybe a structure). The small alcove with four swatches of colored material pinned in a square: In input we see B,R,Y,B etc near top right? Actually there are B,R,Y,B in top right area near A column? Let's locate colored swatches: At rows0-1 columns7-8 we have B,R and Y,B forming a 2x2 square? Row0 col7 B, col8 R. Row1 col7 Y, col8 B. That's a 2x2 square of colors (B,R;Y,B). That's the four swatches. Goal: Each swatch applied to nearest quarter of the framework (green). Green structural elements adopt that swatch's color; open spaces remain voids. The scaffolding (A) is then removed. Output Example1: Let's see output grid 6x6? Actually output lines: ". . B R . R" etc. Let's write rows: Row0: . . B R . R Row1: B B . . . . Row2: B B . R . R Row3: . . . . B . Row4: Y Y Y B B B Row5: . . . . B . So output size is 6x6? Actually each row has 6 entries. So output is trimmed to region containing green after transformation? Let's map. In input, green shape maybe 6x6 region? Let's extract region of green G (and maybe A cross). The green shape appears in lower left area (columns0-5 rows3-8). The cross A column6 and row2 maybe removed. The output appears to be that region after transformation, with colors B,R,Y applied to quadrants. Let's examine mapping: In input, green cells coordinates: Rows3-8, columns0-5 (some). Let's list. Row3: col2 G, col3 G, col5 G Row4: col0 G, col1 G Row5: col0 G, col1 G, col3 G, col5 G Row6: col4 G Row7: col0-5 all G Row8: col4 G So shape is like a plus? Not exactly. Now output: we have colors B,R,Y and also B in many places. Let's map output coordinates (6x6). Probably corresponds to bounding box of green region (rows3-8, cols0-5) which is 6 rows (3-8 inclusive) and 6 columns (0-5). Yes that matches output size 6x6. Now rule: For each green cell, replace with color of nearest swatch (from the 2x2 square) based on quadrant relative to center of green shape? "Each swatch is applied to the nearest quarter of the framework." So we need to divide green shape into four quadrants (quarters) relative to its center (maybe the cross intersection). The swatches correspond to quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right? In example, swatches colors: top-left? The 2x2 square ... [9103 chars truncated]
"A fortress divided by inner walls is conquered quadrant by quadrant, each battalion planting its own banner over the occupied fortifications."
120b: fail
See: Azure inner walls form a cross through the fortress. One large courtyard contains green fortifications. In a small gatehouse nearby, four differently colored battalion banners are staged in formation.
Do: Each battalion breaches the nearest quarter of the fortifications. Every green rampart in their zone is claimed with their banner color. Open ground is left unclaimed. The inner walls crumble after the siege.
Grid: The ruins show only the fortifications — four zones each bearing a different banner's color, open ground black, no dividing walls.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's parse. We have grid with colors and '.' black. Input includes a central cross of azure A? In description: Azure inner walls form a cross through the fortress. One large courtyard contains green fortifications. In a small gatehouse nearby, four differently colored battalion banners are staged in formation. Interpretation: Input shows a cross of A (azure) forming vertical and horizontal line dividing grid into four quadrants. Inside central area there is a region of G (green) representing fortifications (courtyard). In a small gatehouse (maybe a small area near bottom right?) there are four colored banners (different colors) placed in formation (maybe in a row/column). The rule: each battalion (color) breaches nearest quarter of fortifications. Every green rampart in their zone is claimed with their banner color. Open ground left unclaimed. The inner walls crumble after siege (so A removed). Output shows only fortifications colored with banner colors, open ground black, no dividing walls. Thus transformation: Input grid contains a cross of A dividing into four quadrants. In each quadrant there is a region of G (maybe contiguous). Also there are four distinct colors (non-A, non-G) placed somewhere (maybe near center?) representing battalion colors. The output: For each quadrant, replace G cells with the color of the nearest battalion (maybe the one located in that quadrant's "gatehouse"?). The A cells become '.' (black). Non-G cells become '.' unless they are the battalion colors? In output examples, the battalion colors themselves are not present; they become '.' as well? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid size? Let's reconstruct. Input lines (space separated): ". . . . . . A B R" ". . . . . . A Y B" "A A A A A A A A A" ". . G G . G A . ." "G G . . . . A . ." "G G . G . G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." "G G G G G G A . ." ". . . . G . A . ." So 9x9 grid. There is a vertical line of A in column 7 (0-index?). Also a horizontal line of A in row 3? Actually row 2 (0-index) is all A. So cross of A dividing into four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Four battalion colors: B, R, Y, B? Wait there are B, R, Y, B? Actually in top rows we have A B R, A Y B. So colors B,R,Y,B placed near the cross? They are in top-left quadrant? Let's locate: Row0 col6 A, col7 B, col8 R. Row1 col6 A, col7 Y, col8 B. So the battalion colors are in the top-right quadrant (since cross at col6? Actually A column at col6, so columns 7-8 are right side of cross. Row0-1 are above horizontal A line (row2). So they are in top-right quadrant. But there are four colors: B,R,Y,B (B appears twice). Hmm maybe the four colors are B,R,Y,? Actually there are two B's. Maybe the four colors are B,R,Y,? The second B maybe part of something else. Let's look at output example1: Output lines: ". . B R . R" "B B . . . ." "B B . R . R" ". . . . B ." "Y Y Y B B B" ". . . . B ." Wait output size is 6x6? Actually lines have 6 entr ... [11550 chars truncated]
"A stage is divided by curtains into wings, and each wing's actors don costumes matching the spotlight filter assigned to their zone."
120b: fail
See: Azure curtains form a cross on stage. One large wing holds actors arranged in a green-lit pattern. In a small prompt box nearby, four colored spotlight filters are arranged in a square.
Do: Each filter is assigned to the nearest quarter of the stage. Actors in that zone are bathed in the filter's color. Empty stage floor stays dark. The curtains are drawn open for the finale.
Grid: The audience sees only the performers — four stage quarters each lit in a different color, dark floor remaining black, curtains gone.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have input grids 9x9? Example1 input appears 9 columns each row? Let's count: ". . . . . . A B R" =9. 9 rows. Output appears 6 columns? Let's count: ". . B R . R" =6 columns, rows? Output lines: 6 rows? Actually output lines: ". . B R . R" "B B . . . ." "B B . R . R" ". . . . B ." "Y Y Y B B B" ". . . . B ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. So transformation reduces size? Possibly each quarter mapping to color based on nearest filter? Let's interpret metaphor: "Azure curtains form a cross on stage. One large wing holds actors arranged in a green-lit pattern. In a small prompt box nearby, four colored spotlight filters are arranged in a square." So input includes azure 'A' forming cross? In examples, there is a vertical line of A's in column? In example1 input, there is a column of A's? Let's view: rows: first two rows have A at col7? Actually row1: positions 7=A,8=B,9=R. Row2: 7=A,8=Y,9=B. Row3: all A across row. Row4: ". . G G . G A . ." etc. So there is a vertical line of A's in column7 (index 7) and also row3 all A's forming cross. So cross of azure (A). That matches "curtains form a cross". The "large wing holds actors arranged in a green-lit pattern": there is a region of G's maybe bottom left? Indeed rows 4-9 have G's forming shape. The "small prompt box nearby, four colored spotlight filters are arranged in a square." In input, there are four colored cells near top right? In example1, top right 3x3 area includes colors B,R,Y,B etc. Those are the filters? They are in a 2x2? Actually we have A B R in row1 col7-9, A Y B in row2 col7-9. So a 2x3 rectangle of colored cells (B,R,Y,B). Maybe the four filters are B,R,Y,? Actually there are three colors B,R,Y plus maybe something else? In example2, similar: top left area has R Y A etc? Let's examine example2 input: first two rows: "R Y A . . . . . ." and "B M A . . . . . .". So top left 2x3 includes R,Y,A and B,M,A. The cross of A's again row3 all A's and column3? Actually column3 has A's down many rows. So cross again. Thus rule: The cross of A's divides grid into four quadrants (quarters). Each quarter gets colored according to nearest filter (colored cell) located in the "prompt box" which is the top-left 2x3 region? Actually filters are four colored cells arranged in a square near the cross? In example1, the colored cells are at positions (row1,col8)=B, (row1,col9)=R, (row2,col8)=Y, (row2,col9)=B. That's a 2x2 square of colors (B,R,Y,B). In example2, colored cells at (row1,col1)=R, (row1,col2)=Y, (row2,col1)=B, (row2,col2)=M. That's also 2x2 square. Thus each quadrant gets assigned one of those four colors based on proximity (nearest quarter). The output shows only those colored cells where actors (green) were originally? Actually output shows B and R etc in positions where G's were? Let's compare example1: Input green pattern region (G) occupies lower left area (rows4-9, columns1-5 maybe). Output shows B and R and Y in that area? Let's map. ... [11435 chars truncated]
"A garden bed divided by stone paths is planted in four zones, each zone's seedlings blooming in the color of the bulb buried at its nearest corner."
120b: k=2
See: Azure stone paths form a cross through the garden. One large bed holds a pattern of green seedlings. In a small planter nearby, four differently colored bulbs sit in a square arrangement.
Do: Each bulb's color spreads to the seedlings in the nearest quarter of the bed. Green sprouts bloom into that bulb's hue. Bare soil stays bare. The stone paths are removed.
Grid: The harvest shows only the flower bed — four quarters each blooming in a different color, bare patches black, no paths.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with paths (azure A?) stone paths? In description: Azure stone paths form a cross through the garden. So azure A is stone paths forming a cross. Large bed holds pattern of green seedlings (G). Small planter with four differently colored bulbs in a square arrangement (colors: maybe B,R,Y,O etc). The rule: each bulb's color spreads to the seedlings in the nearest quarter of the bed. Green sprouts bloom into that bulb's hue. Bare soil stays bare. The stone paths are removed. Output shows only the flower bed — four quarters each blooming in a different color, bare patches black, no paths. Thus input contains cross of A (azure) dividing grid into four quadrants (quarters). In each quadrant there is a region of G (green) maybe shape. Also there are four colored bulbs placed near center? In examples, we need to locate colored bulbs (non-A, non-G) maybe in a 2x2 block near center? Let's examine Example1 input. I'll rewrite grid coordinates. Example1 input 9x9? Let's list rows: Row0: . . . . . . A B R Row1: . . . . . . A Y B Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: . . G G . G A . . Row4: G G . . . . A . . Row5: G G . G . G A . . Row6: . . . . G . A . . Row7: G G G G G G A . . Row8: . . . . G . A . . So A forms a vertical line column6? Actually column6 (0-index) has A in many rows, plus row2 all A across. So cross: horizontal line row2 all A, vertical line column6 all A. That matches cross. Green region appears in lower-left quadrant (southwest) maybe? Let's see quadrants relative to cross: Quadrant NW (above row2, left of col6) contains only '.' (black). NE (above row2, right of col6) contains B,R,Y,B etc colored bulbs? Actually row0 col7 B, col8 R; row1 col7 Y, col8 B. Those are colored bulbs in a 2x2 square? positions (0,7) B, (0,8) R, (1,7) Y, (1,8) B. That's not a square of four different colors? Colors B,R,Y,B (B repeats). Hmm maybe the bulbs are at the intersection of cross? Wait cross center is (2,6). The 2x2 square maybe adjacent to cross? In example1, the colored bulbs are in the NE quadrant near the cross but not exactly square? Let's map coordinates: rows 0-1, cols7-8. That's a 2x2 block of colors: [B,R; Y,B]. So colors: B,R,Y,B (B appears twice). But description says four differently colored bulbs sit in a square arrangement. In example2 maybe they are distinct. Example2 input: Rows (9x9): 0: R Y A . . . . . . 1: B M A . . . . . . 2: A A A A A A A A A 3: . . A . G . . G . 4: . . A G G G G G G 5: . . A . G . . G . 6: . . A . G . . G . 7: . . A G G G G G G 8: . . A . G . . G . Cross: row2 all A, column2 all A (since column index 2). Indeed column2 has A in rows0-8. So cross. Colored bulbs: top-left quadrant (NW) contains a 2x2 block at rows0-1 cols0-1: R Y; B M. That's four different colors (R,Y,B,M). Good. Green region appears in SE quadrant (south-east) maybe? Actually G pattern appears in rows3-8, columns3-8 (right of column2 and below row2). That's a shape. Output example2: Rows (sam ... [10312 chars truncated]
See: The 10x10 grid is partitioned into rectangular regions by horizontal and vertical separator lines. Separator lines are composed of grey (X) cells interspersed with colored markers (R or B). Horizontal separator lines span entire rows; vertical separator lines span entire columns. Together they form a lattice that divides the grid into rectangular compartments. Inside each compartment, the cells are empty (black dots). The colored markers (R, B) embedded in the separator lines serve as boundary labels for the adjacent compartments.
Do: 1. Identify all horizontal separator rows and vertical separator columns. These are the rows and columns composed entirely of X, R, and B (no dot cells). They form a grid-like lattice. 2. The intersections of these separator lines define rectangular interior regions (compartments) whose cells are all dots in the input. 3. For each compartment, collect all colored (non-X) markers that lie on its four boundary edges — that is, the colored markers on the separator row above, the separator row below, the separator column to the left, and the separator column to the right, restricted to the span of that compartment's extent. Include corner cells shared with adjacent separators. 4. Determine the majority color among these collected boundary markers (whichever of R or B appears more often). 5. Replace every dot cell inside that compartment with the majority color. 6. All separator cells (X and colored markers) remain unchanged in the output.
Grid: The grid is always 10x10. The background fill is black (dots) inside compartments. Grey (X) cells and colored markers (R, B) form separator lines that persist unchanged through the transformation. Separator lines run the full width or height of the grid, creating a lattice of rectangular compartments. Each compartment is at least 1 cell wide and 1 cell tall. The only colors used are black (.), grey (X), red (R), and blue (B).
"Stained glass windows are filled by the dominant color of their surrounding lead frame."
120b: k=1
See: A cathedral wall of grey (X) lead caming forms a lattice of window panes. Embedded in the lead are gemstones — rubies (R) and sapphires (B) — set into the framework like jeweled accents. The window panes themselves are empty (black), waiting to be filled with colored glass.
Do: Each empty pane yearns to be filled with light. It looks to the jewels set into its surrounding frame — the rubies and sapphires adorning its four edges — and takes on the hue of whichever gem appears more often. Where more rubies border a pane, it floods with red light; where sapphires dominate, it glows blue. The lead caming and its embedded jewels remain untouched — only the empty glass transforms.
Grid: The cathedral wall is always 10×10 stones. Grey lead (X) and colored jewels (R, B) form the rigid skeleton that never changes. The black (.) panes sit within rectangular openings in this lattice, each pane at least one stone wide and tall. Only four materials exist: lead (X), ruby (R), sapphire (B), and empty darkness (.) waiting for its color.
We need to infer rule: For each '.' cell, look at its four orthogonal neighbors (up, down, left, right). Count R and B among those neighbors (maybe also X? but description says rubies and sapphires on four edges). Choose whichever appears more often; if tie? maybe keep '.'? In example, we can test. Let's reconstruct example 1 input and output to verify. I'll map coordinates 10x10. Input grid (I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9). Represent. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output grid: Row0 same. Row1: B B X B B B B X B B Row2: B B B B B B B B B B Row3: B B X B B B B X B B Row4: B B X B B B B X B B Row5 same as input row5. Row6: B B X R R R R X B B Row7: B B X R R R R R B B Row8: B B X R R R R X B B Row9: B X X X R X X X X B We need to see transformation of '.' cells only. Let's compute for a sample. Take row1 col0 (input '.'), neighbors: up row0 col0 = R, down row2 col0 = '.' (but that's also '.' originally), left none, right col1 '.' . So only R neighbor? Also maybe consider only non '.'? The rule says look at rubies and sapphires on four edges. So count R and B among the four orthogonal cells, ignoring '.' and X? In this case up is R, down is '.' (ignore), left none, right '.' (ignore). So R count=1, B count=0 => choose R? But output at row1 col0 is B (blue). Hmm not matching. Maybe they consider the four cells that are part of the "frame": the immediate orthogonal cells that are not '.' (i.e., X, R, B). In this case down is '.' but maybe later after transformation? Not. Let's examine row1 col0 output B. So maybe rule is opposite: choose the majority among the four cells (including X?) but X is grey not counted? Let's count: up R, down '.' (maybe treat as empty), left none, right '.' . So R majority, would be R not B. Thus maybe we misinterpret coordinates. Let's double-check input row1 col0 is '.'? Row1: ". . X . . . . X . ." yes first two are '.'. But output row1 col0 is B. So something else. Maybe the rule is to fill each '.' region (connected component) with the color that is most common among the border cells (R or B) surrounding the region (i.e., the region's perimeter). The region may be larger than single cell. In example, there are rectangular openings (windows) comprised of '.' cells forming rectangles. The rule: each empty pane (i.e., each rectangular region) takes color of majority of gems on its four edges (the border of the rectangle). That matches description: "Each empty pane yearns to be filled ... looks to the jewels set into its surrounding frame — the rubies and sapphires adorning its four edges — and takes on the hue of whichever gem appears more often." Thus we need to identify each rectangular region of '.' cells (connected orthogonally) that is bounded by X, R, B (the frame) ... [8813 chars truncated]
"Cells in a tissue matrix absorb the dominant signal from their surrounding membrane receptors."
120b: k=3
See: A lattice of connective tissue (grey fibers) studded with two types of receptor proteins (red and blue) encases hollow cellular chambers.
Do: Each hollow cell senses which receptor type is more abundant along its enclosing membrane walls and fills its cytoplasm with that signal's pigment.
Grid: Grey fibers and receptor markers remain fixed; empty interiors adopt the color of whichever receptor dominates their perimeter.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey fibers (X) are connective tissue, red and blue receptors (R,B). Hollow cellular chambers are empty cells '.' (black). Each hollow cell looks at its enclosing membrane walls (the perimeter of the region of '.'? Actually each '.' cell is inside a region bounded by X, R, B? In examples, '.' cells become either B or R depending on which color dominates along its perimeter. We need to identify connected components of '.' (black) that are surrounded by X,R,B? In examples, output shows that '.' cells are filled with either B or R (or maybe other colors) based on majority of adjacent R/B along the boundary of that region. Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 10x10. Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . R . . Row7: . . X . . . . X . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output rows: 0 same as input. 1: B B X B B B B X B B 2: B B B B B B B B B B 3: B B X B B B B X B B 4: B B X B B B B X B B 5: X B X X X R X X X B (same) 6: B B X R R R R X B B 7: B B X R R R R R B B 8: B B X R R R R X B B 9: B X X X R X X X X B (same) Observation: The '.' cells (originally black) become either B or R. In rows 1-4 region left side (columns 0-1) become B. That region is a 4x2 block of '.' originally (rows1-4, cols0-1). Its perimeter includes surrounding cells: top row0 col0 is R, col1 is X; left border col0 row0 is R, bottom row5 col0 is X, etc. Also there are B at row2 col2? Actually row2 col2 is B (original). That B is adjacent to the region? The region touches B at (2,2) which is right of column1? Actually column2 is index2. The region includes col0-1, so its right boundary touches column2 cells: row1 col2 is X, row2 col2 is B, row3 col2 is X, row4 col2 is X. So there is one B adjacent, and also R at (0,0). Count? The rule maybe count number of R vs B along the perimeter (including diagonal? maybe orthogonal). For this region, B seems majority? Let's compute: perimeter cells around region (including all cells adjacent orthogonally? maybe 4-neighbor). Let's list unique perimeter cells: top row0 col0-1: R, X. left side col0 row0-5: R, ., etc but row5 col0 is X. bottom row5 col0-1: X, B. right side col2 rows1-4: X, B, X, X. Also corners maybe counted twice but ignore. So we have R (0,0), X (0,1), X (5,0), B (5,1), X (1,2), B (2,2), X (3,2), X (4,2). So B count =2, R count=1. So B dominates -> fill with B. Indeed output B. Now region at rows1-4, cols3-8? Actually there are '.' cells scattered. Let's examine region maybe larger. Look at output rows1-4 columns3-8 become B as well (except some X). In input, those positions were '.' except some X at column? Row1 col3 is '.'? Actually row1 col3 is '.'? Input row1: ". . X . . . . X . ." So columns:0 '.';1 '.';2 X;3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 X;8 '.';9 '.'. So region includes many '.' separate ... [8439 chars truncated]
"Dark nebular voids between stellar filaments ignite with the radiation type most prevalent along their bounding strands."
120b: fail
See: Grey cosmic filaments lace through space, studded with red-giant and blue-giant stars at various junctions, enclosing dark voids.
Do: Each void absorbs radiation from the stars along its enclosing filaments and glows with whichever stellar color has more representatives on its borders.
Grid: Filaments and embedded stars remain; dark voids illuminate in the majority star color from their surrounding filament segments.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Grey cosmic filaments lace through space, studded with red-giant and blue-giant stars at various junctions, enclosing dark voids. Each void absorbs radiation from the stars along its enclosing filaments and glows with whichever stellar color has more representatives on its borders. Filaments and embedded stars remain; dark voids illuminate in the majority star color from their surrounding filament segments." Interpretation: Grid has X = grey filament, R = red star, B = blue star, . = black (void). The void cells (.) become colored either R or B depending on majority of adjacent (maybe orthogonal? or maybe along the enclosing filament?) star colors on its border (i.e., neighboring cells that are X? Actually border of void is filament cells X that have stars adjacent? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Let's map. I'll write coordinates. But easier: Look at output: many . turned into B or R. In output, original X and stars unchanged? Let's verify: In Example1 Input row1: "R X X X B X X X X R". Output row1 same. So X and stars unchanged. Row2 Input: ". . X . . . . X . .". Output row2: "B B X B B B B X B B". So the . cells became B (blue) except maybe some become R? All B. So row2's . positions become B. Row2 had . at columns1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10. All turned B. So rule gave B. Row3 Input: ". . B . . . . B . .". Output row3: "B B B B B B B B B B". So all cells become B, including original B? Wait original B at col3 and col8 become B (same). So . turned B. Row3 had . at many positions, turned B. Row4 Input: ". . X . . . . X . .". Output row4: "B B X B B B B X B B". Same pattern as row2. Row5 Input: ". . X . . . . X . .". Output row5 same as row4. Row6 Input: "X B X X X R X X X B". Output row6 same unchanged. Row7 Input: ". . X . . . . R . .". Output row7: "B B X R R R R X B B". So . at col1,2 become B, . at col5,6,7 become R? Wait row7 input: columns: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 R,9 .,10 . . Output: col1 B,2 B,3 X,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 R,8 X? Wait output row7: "B B X R R R R X B B". Let's map: col1 B,2 B,3 X,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 R,8 X,9 B,10 B. But input col8 was R star, output col8 is X? Actually input row7 col8 is R (star). Output row7 col8 is X (filament). That's a change! Wait earlier we thought stars unchanged. But here star turned into X? Let's double-check original row7: from example input lines: Row7 line: ". . X . . . . R . ." Indices: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 R,9 .,10 . Output row7: "B B X R R R R X B B" Indices: 1 B,2 B,3 X,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 R,8 X,9 B,10 B. So indeed original R at col8 became X, and original . at col4-7 became R, and . at col9-10 became B. Also original . at col1-2 became B. Interesting. So transformation also changes some stars to X? But description says filaments and embedded stars remain. However maybe the "filaments" are X, and stars are at junctions (maybe where X intersect?). In input, stars are placed on X? Actually in row7 col8 is R, but surrounding there is X at ... [9899 chars truncated]
"Becalmed lagoons enclosed by reef walls take on the current of whichever tide marker colors more of their coral borders."
120b: fail
See: Grey coral reef walls form a lattice of enclosed lagoons, with red and blue tide markers embedded in the reef at intervals.
Do: Each lagoon reads the tide markers along its surrounding reef walls and fills with the current color that holds the majority.
Grid: Reef walls and tide markers are permanent; still lagoons flood with the dominant tide-marker color from their enclosing reef segments.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Grey coral reef walls form a lattice of enclosed lagoons, with red and blue tide markers embedded in the reef at intervals. Each lagoon reads the tide markers along its surrounding reef walls and fills with the current color that holds the majority. Reef walls and tide markers are permanent; still lagoons flood with the dominant tide-marker color from their enclosing reef segments." Interpretation: Grid has grey X as walls forming enclosures (like boundaries). Red R and Blue B are markers placed on walls (maybe on X cells?). The '.' are black (maybe empty lagoon cells). The rule: For each region (connected component) of '.' cells (black) that is enclosed by X walls (maybe also includes B,R on walls?), we look at the colors of the surrounding wall cells (adjacent to region?) and fill the region with the majority color among those markers (R or B). In examples, '.' become B or R depending. Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 10x10. Let's map. I'll write coordinates row, col 0-9. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . R . . Row7: . . X . . . . . . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output same first row unchanged. Row1 becomes: B B X B B B B X B B. So the '.' cells turned into B (blue) except some maybe? Row1 originally had '.' at col0,1,3,4,5,6,8,9. Output B at all those positions. So region of '.' maybe connected? Let's see walls X at col2 and col7 etc. The region maybe split by X columns. Let's examine connectivity via orthogonal adjacency (4-dir). The X cells act as walls, not traversable. '.' cells are traversable region. So we need to find each connected component of '.' cells (maybe also B,R considered as markers but not traversable). In row1, there is X at col2 and col7, splitting row into three segments: columns 0-1 left segment, columns 3-6 middle, columns 8-9 right. Are they connected vertically? Let's see column0 rows1-4 etc. Row2 col0 '.'; row3 col0 '.'; row4 col0 '.'; row5 col0 X (wall). So left segment includes rows1-4 col0-1 maybe. Row2 col1 '.'; row3 col1 '.'; row4 col1 '.'; row5 col1 B (blue marker) not '.'; but B is a wall? In input, B appears on reef walls (maybe part of wall). So B cells are considered part of wall (non-traversable). So left region of '.' is bounded by X and B etc. Now output for left region (rows1-4 col0-1) becomes B (blue). So majority of surrounding markers is blue. Middle region (col3-6 rows1-4) also becomes B. Right region (col8-9 rows1-4) becomes B as well. Now row2 output: B B B B B B B B B B (all B). Input row2 had '.' at col0,1,3,4,5,6,8,9 and B at col2? Actually row2 col2 is B (blue marker) not '.'; col7 B; others '.' . Output turned all cells (including original B?) Wait output row2 col2 is B (same). col7 B remains B. So all become B. Row3 output: B B X B B B B X B B. Input row3 '.' at col0,1,3,4,5 ... [10782 chars truncated]
"Unpowered circuit zones are energized by whichever voltage rail has more taps along their bordering bus lines."
120b: fail
See: Grey bus lines form a grid of circuit zones, with red (positive) and blue (negative) voltage taps placed along the conductors.
Do: Each unpowered zone checks the voltage taps on its surrounding bus lines and charges to the polarity that appears more frequently.
Grid: Bus lines and voltage taps remain fixed; dead zones energize with the majority tap color from their bounding conductors.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid with bus lines (grey X) forming grid of circuit zones, with red (positive) and blue (negative) voltage taps placed along conductors. Each unpowered zone (black .?) checks surrounding bus lines and charges to polarity that appears more frequently. Bus lines and taps remain fixed; dead zones energize with majority tap color from their bounding conductors. Interpretation: Input grid contains X (grey) as bus lines forming a grid (like lines). Red R and Blue B are taps placed on those lines. The '.' are dead zones (black). The rule: For each '.' cell, look at its orthogonal (maybe 4-direction) neighboring cells that are X (bus lines). Among those neighboring X cells, count how many have adjacent R or B? Wait taps are on bus lines, not on '.' cells. So maybe each '.' zone is surrounded by X cells (forming a rectangle). The taps are on X cells. The zone should adopt the majority color among taps that are reachable via the surrounding X border? Let's examine example. We have 10x10 grid. Let's map coordinates. I'll write input and output to see changes. Example1 Input grid (10x10). I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output grid: Row0 unchanged: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: B B X B B B B X B B Row2: B B B B B B B B B B Row3: B B X B B B B X B B Row4: B B X B B B B X B B Row5: X B X X X R X X X B (unchanged) Row6: B B X R R R R X B B Row7: B B X R R R R R B B Row8: B B X R R R R X B B Row9: B X X X R X X X X B (unchanged) Observations: The X cells remain same (bus lines). The R and B taps remain same (except maybe some new B appear where '.' were). Indeed output has many B and R filling '.' zones. Let's see which '.' turned into B vs R. For each region bounded by X lines, we need to see majority of taps (R/B) on its border. The grid appears to have vertical and horizontal X lines forming a grid. Let's locate X lines: In row0, columns 1-3 are X, column5-8 X etc. Row5 has X at col0,2,3,4,6,7,8. Row9 has X at col1-3,5-8. Seems there are vertical X lines at columns 2? Actually column2 has X in many rows: row0 col2 X, row1 col2 X, row2 col2 B (not X), row3 col2 X, row4 col2 X, row5 col2 X, row6 col2 X, row7 col2 X, row8 col2 X, row9 col2 X. So column2 is mostly X except row2 col2 is B (tap on line). Similarly column7 maybe X. Thus the X lines form a grid of cells (zones) that are '.' originally. The rule: For each zone (connected region of '.' bounded by X lines), count number of R and B taps on the surrounding X border (including maybe taps on the border cells). If more B than R, fill zone with B; if more R, fill with R. If tie? Not seen maybe keep original? In example, zones become B or R accordingly. Let's identify zones. Zone A: top-left area between X ... [8625 chars truncated]
"Mortal realms enclosed by divine barriers are claimed by whichever pantheon has inscribed more runes along the surrounding walls."
120b: fail
See: Grey divine barriers criss-cross the world, with red fire-runes and blue ice-runes carved into them at sacred points, enclosing empty mortal realms.
Do: Each mortal realm counts the runes along its enclosing barriers and is consecrated to whichever pantheon's runes outnumber the other.
Grid: Barriers and runes are eternal; empty realms transform to the color of the dominant rune type along their bounding walls.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey barriers (X) criss-cross, with red fire-runes (R) and blue ice-runes (B) carved into them at sacred points, enclosing empty mortal realms (.) black cells. Each mortal realm counts the runes along its enclosing barriers and is consecrated to whichever pantheon's runes outnumber the other. So we have a grid with X as barriers (walls). Inside each region bounded by X (like connected area of non-X cells?), there are B and R placed on the barriers? Actually description: "Grey divine barriers criss-cross the world, with red fire-runes and blue ice-runes carved into them at sacred points, enclosing empty mortal realms." So X are walls, B and R are on walls (maybe on X cells?). In input examples, X cells are walls, B and R appear on X cells? Let's examine Example1 input: grid 10x10. Row1: R X X X B X X X X R. So at positions 1 and 10 are R (not X). So R can be on non-X cells (maybe on walls). Actually X are walls, but R and B are also on walls? The description: "with red fire-runes and blue ice-runes carved into them at sacred points". So R and B are on the walls (X). So maybe X cells are generic wall, but some X cells are replaced by R or B indicating runes on that wall segment. So the walls are comprised of X, B, R. The interior cells are '.' (black). The rule: For each interior region (connected component of '.' cells bounded by walls), count number of R and B on its boundary (adjacent cells that are wall cells). If more R than B, fill region with R; if more B, fill with B; maybe tie? Not seen. Let's test with Example1. Need to compute region boundaries. Let's map grid coordinates. I'll quickly analyze region near top-left interior. Example1 input grid (I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9). Provide matrix: Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B We need to identify interior regions of '.' cells separated by walls (X,B,R). Let's treat any non-'.' as wall. So '.' cells are interior. Determine connected components via orthogonal adjacency (likely). Let's find region A: top-left area rows1-4 cols0-1 maybe? Row1 col0 '.'; row1 col1 '.'; row2 col0 '.'; row2 col1 '.'; row3 col0 '.'; row3 col1 '.'; row4 col0 '.'; row4 col1 '.'; also row0 col0 is R (wall). Row0 col1 X etc. So region of 8 cells (2x4). Its boundary walls: cells adjacent to region that are not '.' (including X,B,R). Let's count B and R on boundary. Adjacent positions: For each '.' cell, look at its 4-neighbor that is wall. Let's list unique wall cells around region. Coordinates: (1,0) '.' neighbors: up (0,0) R -> R count+1; left none; right (1,1) '.'; down (2,0) '.'. (1,1) '.' neighbors: up (0,1) X; left (1,0) '.'; right (1,2) X; down (2,1) '.'. (2,0) '.' neighbors: up (1,0) '.'; left none; right (2,1) '.'; down (3,0) '.'. (2,1) '.' ... [8178 chars truncated]
"Empty squares on the ballroom floor adopt the rhythm of whichever colored lantern line dominates their bordering rails."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey railings partition the ballroom into dance squares, with red and blue lanterns hung at intervals along the rails. The squares themselves are dark and empty.
Do: Each dance square counts the lanterns of each color along its four surrounding rails and fills with the hue of the majority lantern color.
Grid: Railings and lanterns stay in place; dark squares light up in the dominant lantern color from their enclosing rail segments.
"Empty caverns between mineral veins crystallize with whichever ore pigment dominates the veins enclosing them."
120b: fail
See: Grey mineral veins run through rock in a grid pattern, with red and blue ore deposits embedded along the veins, enclosing hollow caverns.
Do: Each cavern surveys the ore deposits along its surrounding veins and fills with crystals matching whichever ore color is more prevalent on its walls.
Grid: Veins and ore deposits are unchanged; hollow caverns crystallize uniformly in the majority ore color from their bounding vein segments.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey mineral veins (X) run through rock in a grid pattern, with red (R) and blue (B) ore deposits embedded along the veins, enclosing hollow caverns (.) black? Wait '.' is black per key. So '.' are hollow caverns. Veins and ore deposits unchanged; caverns fill with crystals matching whichever ore color is more prevalent on its surrounding veins. Thus each '.' cell looks at its surrounding "vein segments" (X cells) that are adjacent? Probably orthogonal? The description: "surrounding veins" maybe the orthogonal neighbors that are X. Count R and B among those X cells? But X are grey veins, not ore. Actually ore deposits are embedded along the veins, meaning R and B appear on X cells? In examples, R and B appear on X positions? Let's examine Example 1 input and output. Input grid 10x10. Let's map. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output grid same size. Row0 unchanged: R X X X B X X X X R (same) Row1 output: B B X B B B B X B B Row2: B B B B B B B B B B Row3: B B X B B B B X B B Row4: B B X B B B B X B B Row5 unchanged: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: B B X R R R R X B B Row7: B B X R R R R R B B Row8: B B X R R R R X B B Row9 unchanged: B X X X R X X X X B Observation: Only '.' cells changed to B or R. The X, R, B cells remain same. Indeed rows 0,5,9 unchanged (they have no '.'?). Row0 has no '.'; row5 has X B X X X R X X X B (no '.'), row9 similar. So transformation only affects '.' cells. Now we need to see rule: For each '.' cell, look at its "surrounding veins" (X cells) and count R vs B among those X cells? But X cells are grey, not ore. However ore deposits are embedded along the veins, meaning R and B appear on X positions? In input, R and B appear on positions that are not X? Actually row0 col0 is R (not X). So R can be on any cell, not just X. But description: veins are X, ore deposits are R/B embedded along the veins. So perhaps R/B appear on X cells in input? But row0 col0 is R, not X. So maybe the grid includes both veins (X) and ore (R/B) as separate cells; the veins are X cells, and ore deposits are R/B cells that are adjacent to X cells (i.e., on the vein). The '.' cells are cavities surrounded by X cells (veins) and possibly R/B on those veins. Thus for each '.' cell, we consider the orthogonal (or maybe 8-direction) neighboring cells that are X (veins). Among those X cells, we look at the ore colors that are adjacent to those X cells? Hmm. Let's examine a specific '.' cell in example to deduce. Take row1 col0 (position (1,0)). Input '.'; output B. Let's look at its surroundings. Coordinates: row1 col0. Adjacent orthogonal: up (0,0) = R, down (2,0) = ., left none, right (1,1) = . . Diagonal maybe? Up-right (0,1)=X, down-right (2,1)=. So not many X. But output B sugge ... [9840 chars truncated]
"Pastry compartments in a baking mold take on the flavor of whichever spice dots more of their rim."
120b: fail
See: A rigid grey waffle-iron lattice with red and blue seasoning crystals pressed into its ridges forms pockets of empty dough.
Do: Each dough pocket absorbs the dominant seasoning from the crystals lining its edges, coloring the filling accordingly.
Grid: The iron framework and its embedded crystals stay unchanged; raw dough transforms to match the majority seasoning color around each pocket.
We need to infer rule. From description: rigid grey waffle-iron lattice with red and blue seasoning crystals pressed into its ridges forms pockets of empty dough. So grid has grey X as lattice (walls). Red R and blue B are crystals on ridges (edges). Empty dough pockets are '.' (black). Each pocket absorbs dominant seasoning from crystals lining its edges, coloring the filling accordingly. So for each '.' cell, look at its orthogonal (maybe also diagonal?) neighbors that are not '.'? The "edges" of pocket likely the immediate orthogonal neighbors that are X (walls) with crystals? Actually crystals are on ridges (X cells) maybe? In examples, X are grey lattice, B and R are crystals placed on X cells? Let's examine Example1 input and output. I'll parse small region. Input row1: R X X X B X X X X R (top row). Output same row unchanged. So border cells unchanged. Row2 input: . . X . . . . X . . ; output row2: B B X B B B B X B B. So the '.' cells became B (blue) in many places. Let's see surroundings: Row2 col1 '.' has above row1 col1 R, left none, right col2 '.' (also '.'), below row3 col1 '.'? Actually row3 col1 '.'? Input row3: . . B . . . . B . . So below is '.' . So majority of neighboring crystals? Let's compute maybe consider the 4-directional neighbors that are not '.' (i.e., X, B, R). But row2 col1 has neighbor up R, right '.' (ignore), down '.' (ignore), left none. So only R present, but output is B, not R. So maybe consider the whole pocket region (connected '.' cells) and look at the crystals (B/R) on the boundary of that region (adjacent to any '.' cell). Then fill the whole pocket with the dominant color among those boundary crystals. Let's test. In Example1, there is a large pocket of '.' cells in upper left area? Let's map. I'll label coordinates (row, col) 1-10. Input grid (E1): Row1: 1 R,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 B,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 R Row2: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row3: 1 .,2 .,3 B,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 B,9 .,10 . Row4: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row5: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row6: 1 X,2 B,3 X,4 X,5 X,6 R,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 B Row7: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 R,9 .,10 . Row8: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 . Row9: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row10:1 B,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 R,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 B Output grid (E1): Row1 unchanged. Row2: B B X B B B B X B B Row3: B B B B B B B B B B Row4: B B X B B B B X B B Row5: B B X B B B B X B B Row6 unchanged. Row7: B B X R R R R X B B Row8: B B X R R R R R B B Row9: B B X R R R R X B B Row10 unchanged. Observation: The '.' region in upper left (rows2-5, cols1-2) became all B. The boundary crystals around that region: Let's list B and R adjacent to that region. The region includes cells (2,1)(2,2)(3,1)(3,2)(4,1)(4,2)(5,1)(5,2). Adjacent cells (orthogonal) that are not '.' include: (1,1) R, (1,2) X (grey), (2,3) X, (3,3) B, (4,3) X, (5,3) X, (6,1) X, (6,2) B, (1,1) R, (6,2) B, (2,0) none, etc. So crystals: R at (1,1) and B at (3,3) and B at (6,2). ... [7679 chars truncated]
"Silent chambers in a cathedral organ resonate with the pitch carried by most of the pipes framing them."
120b: fail
See: Grey organ pipes and colored tone-markers (red and blue) form a rigid scaffolding around silent air chambers.
Do: Each air chamber listens to the colored tone-markers bordering it and fills with the resonance of whichever tone appears more often along its walls.
Grid: Pipes and tone-markers hold their positions; silent chambers fill with the majority tone color from their surrounding frame.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input 10x10 grid with colors: R, B, X, . (black). Output same size. Observations: The border elements (R, B, X) remain same? Let's compare. Input row1: "R X X X B X X X X R" Output row1 same: "R X X X B X X X X R" unchanged. Row2 input: ". . X . . . . X . ." Output row2: "B B X B B B B X B B" So the '.' (black) cells changed to B or something based on surrounding? The X cells unchanged (col3 and col8). Row2 col1 '.' became B. Row2 col2 '.' became B. Row2 col4 '.' became B etc. So they filled with majority tone color from surrounding frame. Interpretation: The "air chambers" are black cells (.) that are enclosed by colored markers (R, B, maybe X?). The "tone-markers" are red and blue (R,B). Grey pipes are X. The rule: For each contiguous region of black cells (connected orthogonally?) that is surrounded by R and B (maybe also X?), we fill the region with whichever of R or B appears more along its border (the cells adjacent to region). If tie? maybe keep original? Let's test. Consider region of black cells in example: Let's map. I'll reconstruct grid coordinates (0-index). Input: Row0: 0 R,1 X,2 X,3 X,4 B,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 R Row1: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row2: 0 .,1 .,2 B,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 . Row3: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row4: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row5: 0 X,1 B,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 R,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 B Row6: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 R,8 .,9 . Row7: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 R,9 . Row8: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row9: 0 B,1 X,2 X,3 X,4 R,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 B Now output: Row1 (index1) becomes B B X B B B B X B B. So all '.' turned B. Let's see border of that region: The region includes many '.' cells maybe connected? Let's see connectivity: Starting at (1,0) '.' adjacent to (0,0) R above, (2,0) '.' below, (1,1) '.' right, (0,0) R left? Actually left out of grid. So border includes R at (0,0) and maybe B at (2,2) etc. Need to compute majority of R vs B along perimeter of region. But output shows B for all those cells, meaning B majority. Let's compute border colors of region of '.' cells that are not separated by X? X are walls (pipes) that block region? The '.' region maybe separated by X cells. Let's identify region of '.' cells that are not adjacent to X? Actually X are grey pipes that are part of scaffolding, not changed. In row1, column2 is X, so region left of that X includes columns 0,1,3-? but there is X at col2 separating. So region left side includes (1,0),(1,1) etc. Also (2,0),(2,1) etc. Let's map region A: cells (r,c) where input '.' and reachable without crossing X. X cells are at positions where input has X. So region A includes many '.' cells in top-left area bounded by X column2 and row5 maybe. Let's compute border colors of region A: The cells adjacent (orthogonal) to any cell in region that are not '.' (i.e., are R, B, X). Among those, count R vs B? X maybe ignored. The rule says "colored tone-markers (red and bl ... [7548 chars truncated]
"Empty zones on a playing field are claimed by whichever team has planted more flags along the boundary fences."
120b: k=3
See: Grey boundary fences crisscross the field, with red and blue team flags anchored at intervals along them, enclosing unclaimed zones.
Do: Each unclaimed zone tallies the team flags along all four of its fence boundaries and is captured by whichever team has more flags there.
Grid: Fences and flags remain in place; empty zones flood with the color of the team holding the majority of bordering flags.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey X are fences? Actually "Grey boundary fences crisscross the field" so X are fences. Red R and blue B are flags anchored at intervals along them. Unclaimed zones are '.' (black) maybe? In inputs, '.' appear as black cells inside zones. Output fills those zones with majority color of bordering flags along its fence boundaries. So we need to identify connected regions of '.' (black) that are enclosed by X fences? The fences are X lines forming grid lines? In examples, X form vertical/horizontal lines dividing grid into cells. The '.' are interior cells. The rule: For each region of '.' (connected orthogonally) that is surrounded by X fences (i.e., region inside a rectangle formed by X lines), count number of B and R cells that are adjacent to the region along the fence boundaries (i.e., on the fence cells? Actually flags are placed on X cells? In examples, B and R appear on X cells? Let's examine Example1 input: grid 10x10. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R. So top row has R at col0, B at col4, R at col9. X elsewhere. So flags are on X cells? Actually they are on same row as X? The X are fences; flags are placed at intervals along them, maybe replacing X? But in input, flags appear on positions where X would be? In row0, positions 0 and 9 are R (not X). So maybe flags are on border cells (outside fences) not on X. In row0 col0 is R (edge). Row0 col4 is B. Row0 col9 is R. So flags are on border cells (outside). In row5: X B X X X R X X X B. So B at col1, R at col5, B at col9. Those are on X line? Row5 col1 is B, but column1 maybe part of vertical fence? Let's see column1 values: row0 X, row1 ., row2 ., row3 ., row4 ., row5 B, row6 ., row7 ., row8 ., row9 X. So column1 has X at top row, B at row5, X at bottom row. So B sits on fence line (vertical). So flags are placed on X cells (fence) replacing X with B or R. So fences are X, but some X cells are replaced by B or R flags. Thus rule: For each region of '.' (black) that is bounded by X (including flags) on its four sides (i.e., region inside a rectangle formed by X lines), we count flags (B,R) on the surrounding fence cells that are adjacent to the region (i.e., on the perimeter). Then fill region with majority color (B or R). If tie? maybe keep original? Not seen. Check Example1: Look at region top-left interior? Let's compute quickly. Input region between rows1-4 and columns1-2? Actually there is a vertical fence at column2? Let's map. But easier: Look at output: many B fill interior left side, many R fill interior right side. So rule plausible. Implementation: Need to process test input manually. We have 10x10 grid. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input grid: Row0: X B X X X X X X B X Row1: . . X . . X . . . . Row2: . . X . . B . . . . Row3: X X X X B X X R B X Row4: . . R . . R . . . . Row5: . . X . . X . . . . Row6: R X X X R X X B R X Row7: . . B . . R . . . . Row8: . . X . . X . . . . Row9: X R X X X X B X X B We need to identify fence lines (X) fo ... [9130 chars truncated]
"Calm valleys between mountain ridges fill with the weather front that dominates their surrounding peaks."
120b: fail
See: Grey mountain ridges form a lattice across the landscape, with red (warm front) and blue (cold front) weather beacons planted along the ridgelines, enclosing calm valleys.
Do: Each valley surveys the weather beacons along its bounding ridges and fills entirely with whichever front has more beacons around it.
Grid: Mountain ridges and beacons persist; empty valleys saturate with the majority front color from their enclosing ridgeline markers.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey mountain ridges (X) form lattice across landscape, with red (R) and blue (B) beacons planted along ridgelines, enclosing calm valleys (.) black? Actually '.' is black per key. Valleys are black cells. Each valley surveys the beacons along its bounding ridges and fills entirely with whichever front has more beacons around it. So we need to identify connected regions of '.' (black) that are enclosed by X ridges? The ridges are X cells forming walls. The beacons are R or B placed on ridges (X cells? Actually in input, R and B appear on X positions? In example, grid 10x10. Let's examine example 1 input and output to deduce. I'll write coordinates. Input row1: "R X X X B X X X X R" Row2: ". . X . . . . X . ." Row3: ". . B . . . . B . ." Row4: ". . X . . . . X . ." Row5: ". . X . . . . X . ." Row6: "X B X X X R X X X B" Row7: ". . X . . . . X . ." Row8: ". . X . . . . R . ." Row9: ". . X . . . . X . ." Row10:"B X X X R X X X X B" Output row1 unchanged. Row2 output: "B B X B B B B X B B". So the '.' cells in row2 become B or maybe based on surrounding beacons. Row2 originally had '.' at col1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10? Actually row2: ". . X . . . . X . ." So positions: 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 are '.'; col3 X, col8 X. Output row2: B B X B B B B X B B. So all those '.' turned into B. So valley region filled with B. Row3 input: ". . B . . . . B . ." Output: "B B B B B B B B B B". So all '.' become B, and also the B beacons remain B? Actually original B at col3 and col8 remain B (they are beacons). Output row3 all B. Row4 input: ". . X . . . . X . ." Output: "B B X B B B B X B B". So '.' become B. Row5 same as row4. Row6 input: "X B X X X R X X X B" Output unchanged? Row6 output: "X B X X X R X X X B" same. Row7 input: ". . X . . . . X . ." Output: "B B X R R R R X B B". Interesting: now some '.' become R. Let's see row7 col4-7 become R. Row7 originally '.' at col1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10. Output: col1,2 become B; col4-7 become R; col9,10 become B. So valley split? There is a ridge of X at col3 and col8. So region left of X (col1-2) maybe one valley, region between X's (col4-7) another valley, region right of X (col9-10) another valley. The beacons around each valley: need to count R vs B on surrounding ridges. Let's analyze valley between X's (col4-7) row7. The surrounding ridges: top row6 col4-7 are X X X? Row6 col4 X, col5 X, col6 R (beacon), col7 X. Bottom row8 col4-7 are '.'? Row8 input: ". . X . . . . R . ." So row8 col4-7 are '.' (valley). Left ridge column3 is X (col3). Right ridge column8 is X. Also maybe side columns? The valley region includes rows7-? Actually need to consider connected region of '.' bounded by X cells (including edges). Let's map region between X's columns 4-7 rows7-9? Row8 col4-7 '.'; Row9 col4-7 '.' (row9 input ". . X . . . . X . .") So region is a rectangle 3 rows (7-9) and columns 4-7, bounded left/right by X at col3 and col8, top by row6 (which has X X X R X) includes a R at col6, bottom by row10? ... [8990 chars truncated]
"Empty rooms in a blueprint flood with the hue dictated by the majority of colored keystones in their surrounding walls."
120b: fail
See: Load-bearing grey walls intersect to form rooms, with red and blue keystones embedded at intervals along the wall segments.
Do: Each room counts the colored keystones in all four of its enclosing walls and is painted with whichever keystone color predominates.
Grid: Walls and keystones are structural and unchanged; room interiors adopt the majority keystone color from their bounding walls.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey walls X intersect to form rooms, with red R and blue B keystones embedded at intervals along wall segments. Each room counts colored keystones in all four of its enclosing walls and is painted with whichever keystone color predominates. Walls and keystones unchanged; room interiors adopt majority keystone color from bounding walls. Interpretation: Input grid contains walls (X) forming rectangular rooms (like lines of X). Keystones are R or B placed on walls (maybe on X cells? Actually in example, R and B appear on same positions as X? Let's examine example 1 input and output. Input grid 10x10. Let's map. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . R . . Row7: . . X . . . . X . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output grid same size. Let's compare. Row0 unchanged: R X X X B X X X X R (walls and keystones unchanged) Row1 output: B B X B B B B X B B Original row1 had . . X . . . . X . . (dots are black interior?). In output, many B's fill interior of rooms? Row1 now has B's except X at column2? Actually column2 is X (index2). So interior cells become B. Row2 output: B B B B B B B B B B (all B). Original had . . B . . . . B . . (dots and B keystones). So interior filled B. Row3 output: B B X B B B B X B B (similar to row1). Row4 same. Row5 unchanged: X B X X X R X X X B (walls and keystones unchanged) Row6 output: B B X R R R R X B B (original . . X . . . . R . .). So interior now B except where walls? Actually column3 is X unchanged, column7 is X unchanged. The interior region maybe colored R? Wait row6 output has R's from col3? Let's index columns 0-9. Row6 output: col0 B,1 B,2 X,3 R,4 R,5 R,6 R,7 X,8 B,9 B. So interior cells between walls maybe colored R because majority keystone color in surrounding walls is red. Row7 output: B B X R R R R R B B (original . . X . . . . X . .). Row8 similar. Row9 unchanged: B X X X R X X X X B Thus pattern: There are rooms defined by X walls forming rectangular enclosures. The interior cells (originally .) become either B or R depending on majority of keystones (R/B) on the four walls surrounding that room. We need to identify rooms. Let's map walls: X cells form lines. In example, there is a central vertical wall column2? Actually many X's. Let's visualize quickly: I'll mark coordinates. Row0: 0R 1X 2X 3X 4B 5X 6X 7X 8X 9R Row1: 0. 1. 2X 3. 4. 5. 6. 7X 8. 9. Row2: 0. 1. 2B 3. 4. 5. 6. 7B 8. 9. Row3: 0. 1. 2X 3. 4. 5. 6. 7X 8. 9. Row4: same as row3 Row5: 0X 1B 2X 3X 4X 5R 6X 7X 8X 9B Row6: 0. 1. 2X 3. 4. 5. 6. 7R 8. 9. Row7: 0. 1. 2X 3. 4. 5. 6. 7X 8. 9. Row8: same as row7 Row9: 0B 1X 2X 3X 4R 5X 6X 7X 8X 9B We see walls forming three rooms? Let's see region top-left interior bounded by X walls? The X walls likely form a rectangular border: maybe the outer border is not full X; but there is a vertical ... [8934 chars truncated]
"Contested territories fall to whichever army has stationed more sentries along the fortification walls enclosing them."
120b: fail
See: Grey fortification walls form a grid of contested territories, with red and blue sentries posted at intervals along the ramparts.
Do: Each territory counts the sentries of each color along its surrounding walls and surrenders to the army with more sentries on its borders.
Grid: Fortifications and sentries remain fixed; empty territories are colored by whichever army's sentries outnumber the other along the enclosing walls.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid with grey walls (X) forming grid of contested territories, red and blue sentries posted at intervals along ramparts. Each territory counts sentries of each color along its surrounding walls and surrenders to army with more sentries on its borders. Fortifications and sentries remain fixed; empty territories are colored by whichever army's sentries outnumber the other along the enclosing walls. Interpretation: Input grid contains X (grey walls), B (blue sentry), R (red sentry), . (black?) maybe empty territory? In examples, '.' appears as black cells (maybe empty). Output fills many '.' with B or R depending on surrounding X walls? Let's examine. In Example1 Input: 10x10 grid. Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Output rows: 0 same as input. 1: B B X B B B B X B B 2: B B B B B B B B B B 3: B B X B B B B X B B 4: B B X B B B B X B B 5: X B X X X R X X X B (same as input) 6: B B X R R R R X B B 7: B B X R R R R R B B 8: B B X R R R R X B B 9: B X X X R X X X X B (same as input) Observation: The border rows (0,5,9) unchanged (they contain X walls and sentries). The interior '.' become B or R depending on surrounding walls? Let's see region: The X walls form a grid pattern: there are vertical columns of X at column2? Actually look at input: many '.' and X. The X's seem to form a grid of walls: at positions where X appears, they are walls. The '.' are empty cells (territories). The rule: For each empty cell (.) we look at the nearest X walls in four directions? Or count sentries (B,R) that are adjacent to the walls surrounding the region? Let's analyze region: In example1, there is a central area of '.' bounded by X walls forming a rectangle? Let's map coordinates with indices. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input grid: I'll create matrix. Row0: col0 R,1 X,2 X,3 X,4 B,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 R Row1: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row2: 0 .,1 .,2 B,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 . Row3: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row4: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row5: 0 X,1 B,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 R,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 B Row6: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row7: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 R,8 .,9 . Row8: 0 .,1 .,2 X,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 . Row9: 0 B,1 X,2 X,3 X,4 R,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 B Now output: many '.' become B or R. Let's see which become B vs R. Output row1: B B X B B B B X B B (so all '.' turned B) Row2: all B Row3: B B X B B B B X B B (same as row1) Row4: same as row3 Row6: B B X R R R R X B B Row7: B B X R R R R R B B Row8: B B X R R R R X B B So region top-left area (rows1-4, cols0-1) become B. Region bottom-left area rows6-8 cols0-1 become B as well. The central region rows6-8 cols3-6 become R. So rule: each "territory" ... [8050 chars truncated]
"Darkened stage sections are lit by whichever colored spotlight has more fixtures mounted on their surrounding catwalks."
120b: fail
See: Grey catwalks criss-cross above the stage, holding red and blue spotlight fixtures at various points, with dark stage sections below.
Do: Each dark section counts the spotlight fixtures of each color along the catwalks directly bordering it and is illuminated in the majority color.
Grid: Catwalks and fixture positions are unchanged; dark sections glow with the color of whichever spotlight type dominates their surrounding framework.
We need to infer rule. From description: "dark sections" are '.' cells (black). They count spotlight fixtures of each color along the catwalks directly bordering it and is illuminated in the majority color. Catwalks are X (grey) maybe? Fixtures are R and B (red and blue). So grid has X as catwalks (grey), R/B as fixtures, . as dark sections (black). The rule: For each '.' cell, look at the "catwalks directly bordering it" (adjacent? maybe orthogonal? Or maybe along lines of X that are connected?). Count number of R and B fixtures that are reachable along catwalks that border the dark cell. The majority color determines the new color of that cell (becomes that color). In output examples, '.' become B or R accordingly. Let's verify with Example1. We have 10x10 grid. Let's map coordinates. I'll write input and output. Input row1: R X X X B X X X X R Row2: . . X . . . . X . . Row3: . . B . . . . B . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: . . X . . . . X . . Row6: X B X X X R X X X B Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: . . X . . . . X . . Row10: B X X X R X X X X B Output row1 unchanged (same). Row2 output: B B X B B B B X B B Row3: B B B B B B B B B B Row4: B B X B B B B X B B Row5: B B X B B B B X B B Row6 unchanged? Row6 output: X B X X X R X X X B (same) Row7 output: B B X R R R R X B B Row8 output: B B X R R R R R B B Row9 output: B B X R R R R X B B Row10 unchanged: B X X X R X X X X B So only '.' cells changed to B or R. Some '.' remained '.'? Actually row6 had no '.' originally. Row1 and row6 and row10 unchanged (they have no '.' maybe). Row2 had '.' at positions 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10? Actually row2: . . X . . . . X . . => columns 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 are '.'; output row2: B B X B B B B X B B => all those become B. So majority color around each '.' is B. Row3: . . B . . . . B . . => '.' at 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 become B (output all B). Row4: . . X . . . . X . . => '.' at 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 become B except column? output row4: B B X B B B B X B B (all B). Row5 same. Row7: . . X . . . . R . . => '.' at 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 output: B B X R R R R X B B. So some become R (columns 4-7 become R). Row8: . . X . . . . X . . => '.' at 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10 output: B B X R R R R R B B (col4-8? Actually col8 is X unchanged). Row9 similar. Thus rule depends on neighboring catwalks (X) that border the '.' cell. Need to see which fixtures are reachable via X network adjacent to that '.'. Let's examine layout of X (catwalks). They form cross shapes? In example, X's are in columns 3? Actually many X's in column3? Let's map coordinates (row, col). I'll create grid with indices 1-10. Row1: col1 R,2 X,3 X,4 X,5 B,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 R Row2: col1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row3: col1 .,2 .,3 B,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 B,9 .,10 . Row4: col1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 . Row5: same as row4. Row6: col1 X,2 B,3 X,4 X,5 X,6 R,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 B Row7: col1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 R,9 .,10 . Row8: col1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 ... [10581 chars truncated]
"Empty garden beds take root from whichever seed type is sown more heavily along their bordering trellises."
120b: fail
See: Grey wooden trellises partition a garden into rectangular beds, with red and blue seed pods lodged at intervals along the trellis beams. The beds themselves are bare soil.
Do: Each bed germinates with the flower color matching whichever seed pod appears more often along its enclosing trellis edges.
Grid: Trellises and seed pods stay fixed; bare soil beds bloom uniformly in the majority seed color from their surrounding frame.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid with trellises (grey X) forming rectangular frames (beds). Red R and blue B seed pods placed along trellis beams (edges). The interior cells (.) are black (soil). Output: fill interior of each rectangular region bounded by X (grey) with majority color (R or B) among the X's edges? Actually edges have seed pods (R/B) at intervals along trellis beams. The rule: For each rectangular region enclosed by X's (forming a rectangle border), count number of R and B on its border (including corners?) and fill interior (originally .) with the majority color (R or B). The X's remain unchanged. Also maybe other colors (like other letters) appear? In examples only X, R, B, . present. Output shows interior cells become either B or R depending on majority. Let's verify with Example1. Input grid 10x10. Let's locate rectangles formed by X's. The pattern: there are multiple rectangular frames? Let's examine. Row0: R X X X B X X X X R Row1: . . X . . . . X . . Row2: . . B . . . . B . . Row3: . . X . . . . X . . Row4: . . X . . . . X . . Row5: X B X X X R X X X B Row6: . . X . . . . X . . Row7: . . X . . . . R . . Row8: . . X . . . . X . . Row9: B X X X R X X X X B Looks like there are three rectangular frames? Let's identify: The outermost border maybe? Row0 and Row9 have X's and R/B at ends. But there are X's across row0 columns1-8, with R at col0 and col9. Row9 similar. Columns? Column0 has R at row0, B at row9, and . at rows1-8? Actually column0 rows1-8 are '.' except row5 is X? Wait row5 col0 is X. So not a solid border. Maybe each rectangle is defined by X's forming a closed loop. For example rectangle top-left: at (0,1)-(0,3) X's, then down column3 rows1-4 have X? Row1 col3 is X, row2 col3 is ., row3 col3 is X, row4 col3 is X, row5 col3 is X, etc. Hmm. Better to think: The X's form a grid of lines (like trellises) dividing area into cells (beds). The X's are like walls. The interior cells (.) are within each region bounded by X's (including edges). The rule: For each region, count R and B that lie on its boundary (i.e., adjacent to region via X cells?). Actually seed pods are placed "along the trellis beams" meaning on X cells? In input, R and B appear on X cells? Let's see: In example1, R at (0,0) which is not X, it's R on border outside? Actually (0,0) is R, not X. So seed pods can be on non-X cells? But description says seed pods lodged at intervals along the trellis beams. Trellis beams are X cells. However R/B appear on positions that are not X (like (0,0) is R, (0,4) B, (0,9) R). Those are at ends of row0 where X's are also present? Row0 col1-8 are X, col0 and col9 are R. So maybe the trellis includes the outermost line of X's, but the ends have seed pods (R/B) attached to the trellis ends (outside). So seed pods are on the same line as X but at positions where X is missing (i.e., '.' replaced by R/B). So the border of a region consists of X cells plus possibly R/B cells where they replace X. Thus to co ... [10024 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains a single 2x2 solid block of a colored cell (non-black) and one or more isolated single cells of the same color positioned diagonally adjacent to corners of the 2x2 block. These single cells act as diagonal arms indicating ray directions extending outward from the block.
Do: Keep the original 2x2 block and all original single cells in place. For each single cell that is diagonally adjacent to a corner of the 2x2 block, identify the diagonal direction pointing away from the block (i.e., the direction from the block's corner to that single cell). Starting from that single cell, continue placing one cell of the same color per row along that diagonal, stepping one row and one column in the same direction each time, until reaching the edge of the grid.
Grid: The grid is 10x10 with a black (.) background. All colored cells share the same single color. The 2x2 block is positioned away from the edges, leaving room for diagonal rays to extend to the grid boundary.
"A comet streaks away from its home planet, leaving a glowing trail across the night sky."
120b: k=1
See: In the darkness of space, a small colored planet floats — a solid 2×2 world. Nearby, one or two comets have just launched from its corners, each a single bright spark sitting diagonally adjacent to the planet's surface.
Do: Each comet is hurtling away from the planet. It blazes a trail across the void, dropping one spark of light in every row it crosses, always flying diagonally outward until it crashes into the edge of the universe. The planet itself stays fixed — only the comets move, and they never look back.
Grid: The universe is a 10×10 field of black void. The planet and its comets share one color — they belong to the same star system. The planet drifts far enough from the edges that each comet has runway to streak across the sky before hitting the boundary.
We need to infer rule. From description: planet is 2x2 block, comets are single cells diagonally adjacent to planet corners. They move outward diagonally, leaving a trail: one spark per row they cross, until hitting edge. The planet stays fixed. So input has a 2x2 block of a color (same as comets). The comets are at positions diagonally adjacent to the block corners (i.e., at (row-1,col-1) etc). They then move outward: each step they go one row and one column further away (same direction) until edge, and they fill cells along the way? "dropping one spark of light in every row it crosses" meaning they fill each cell along its diagonal path? In example 1, color Y. Let's examine input and output. Example1 Input grid: Let's map coordinates (0-index). We'll list Y positions. Rows: 0: none 1: column6? Actually row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => column6 (0-index) = Y. 2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => columns4,5 Y. 3: same as row2 columns4,5 Y. 4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => column6 Y. others none. So shape: a 2x2 block at rows2-3, cols4-5 (that's the planet). Comets: there are Y at (1,6) which is diagonally adjacent to top-right corner? Planet top-right corner is (2,5). Diagonal up-right from that is (1,6) yes. Also Y at (4,6) which is diagonal down-right from bottom-right corner (3,5) -> (4,6). So there are two comets on the right side only. No left side comets. Output Y positions: Row0: column7? ". . . . . . . Y . ." => col7 Y. Row1: column6 Y. Row2: cols4,5 Y (same planet) Row3: cols4,5 Y Row4: column6 Y (same as input) Row5: column7 Y. Row6: column8 Y. Row7: column9 Y. Rows8-9 none. So the comet at (1,6) moved outward up-right direction: from (1,6) to (0,7) then hits edge? Actually continues until column9? Wait up-right from (1,6) goes to (0,7) then next would be (-1,8) out of grid, so stops at (0,7). That's present in output row0 col7 Y. Good. The comet at (4,6) moves down-right: (5,7), (6,8), (7,9) then out. Output includes Y at (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). Yes. Thus rule: For each comet cell that is diagonally adjacent to the 2x2 block, extend a line of same color outward in same diagonal direction until hitting grid edge, filling each cell along the way (including original comet? original stays? In output, original comet positions remain? Yes (1,6) and (4,6) still present). So we keep original comet and add trail cells beyond it outward. Now test input: we need to locate 2x2 block of same color A (azure). Input grid: Rows: 0 all . 1 all . 2 all . 3: ". . . . . A . . . ." => column5? Actually count: indices 0-9. Row3 col5 = A. 4: ". . . A A . . . . ." => col3,4 = A A. 5: same row5 col3,4 = A A. 6: ". . A . . A . . . ." => col2 = A, col5 = A. 7-9 all . Let's map positions. Planet: 2x2 block likely at rows4-5, cols3-4 (since that's a 2x2 of A). Yes. Now comets: cells diagonally adjacent to any corner of that block. Corners of block: Top-left: (4,3) Top-right: (4,4) Bottom-left: (5,3) Bottom-right: (5,4) Check diagonal adjacent cel ... [2969 chars truncated]
"A cell nucleus sends out tendrils of cytoplasm, each filament stretching toward the membrane wall along the path first signaled by a pioneer molecule."
120b: k=1
See: A dense cluster of organelles forms the nucleus, with scout molecules perched at its diagonal edges.
Do: Each scout molecule initiates a chain of replication, spawning identical molecules in a line from itself to the cell membrane, following the trajectory away from the nucleus.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background, single color for all living material.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming shape: there is a dense cluster (nucleus) and scout molecules at diagonal edges. In example, Y's positions: let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input example1 Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) That's like a small cluster plus two at diagonal edges? Actually cluster maybe central: positions (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5) form 2x2 block. Scouts at diagonal edges: (1,6) is up-right diagonal from cluster? (4,6) is down-right diagonal. So scouts are at diagonal edges of cluster (top-right and bottom-right). The rule: each scout initiates a chain of replication, spawning identical molecules in a line from itself to the cell membrane, following the trajectory away from the nucleus. So from each scout, extend line outward away from cluster (nucleus) until edge of grid, filling with same color Y. In output, we see Y's extended: original cluster unchanged, plus lines from scouts outward to right-bottom? Let's see output Y positions: Row0: col7? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (1,6) (original) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) unchanged Row3: same (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) unchanged Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => Y at (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => Y at (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So from scout at (1,6) we extended upward-right? Actually direction away from nucleus: cluster center maybe around (2.5,4.5). Vector from cluster to scout (1,6) is (-1, +2). Direction away from cluster would continue same vector direction: go further up-right (row-1, col+1) each step? Starting at (1,6) next would be (0,7) which matches Y added. Next would be (-1,8) out of grid stop. So line of length 1 added. From scout at (4,6) vector from cluster (approx) is (+1,+2). Continue down-right: (5,7) added, (6,8) added, (7,9) added. That's exactly output. Thus rule: Identify the central dense cluster (maybe the largest contiguous block of same color). Identify "scout" cells of same color that are located diagonally adjacent (maybe at positions offset by (±1, ±2?) Actually they are at diagonal edges of cluster: they are at positions that are one step away in row direction and two steps away in column? Let's examine: cluster is 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5. The scouts are at (1,6) which is row-1, col+1 from top-right corner (2,5). That's diagonal (north-east) adjacent (difference -1,+1). Similarly (4,6) is row+1, col+1 from bottom-right corner (3,5). So scouts are diagonal adjacent to cluster at its right side corners. Thus rule: For each cell of the target color that is isolated (not part of the main cluster) and is positioned diagonally adjacent to the cluster, extend a line of that color outward in the same diagonal direction until hitting grid edge. Now test input: color A (azure). Let's map positions. Rows (0-index): Row3: col5 ... [2810 chars truncated]
"A binary star system pulses at the center of the field, and certain gravitational lensing artifacts streak diagonally outward like phantom images toward the edge of the telescope's frame."
120b: k=1
See: A compact stellar mass sits in the grid with lensing artifacts appearing at diagonal adjacencies.
Do: Each artifact replicates itself outward along its diagonal trajectory, one pixel per frame, until it exits the field of view.
Grid: 10x10 dark sky, all luminous objects in one color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming a compact mass with lensing artifacts at diagonal adjacencies. Output shows Y's shifted along diagonals outward one step per frame until exit. Let's examine example. Input coordinates (row, col) 0-index? Let's list Y positions: Row1 (index1): row1? Actually given grid lines. Let's index rows 0-9. Row0: all . Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => Y at (2,4) and (2,5) Row3: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => Y at (3,4) and (3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (4,6) Rows5-9 empty. So shape: a central block of 2x2 at (2-3,4-5) plus two single Y's at (1,6) and (4,6) forming diagonal adjacency? Let's see: (1,6) is up-right of (2,5) (diagonal). (4,6) is down-right of (3,5). So lensing artifacts appear at diagonal adjacencies to the compact mass (the 2x2 block). The rule: each artifact replicates outward along its diagonal trajectory, one pixel per frame, until it exits the field. Thus in output, we see Y's moving outward along same diagonal direction each step? Let's see output grid Y positions: Row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (1,6) (same as input) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => same block at (2,4)(2,5) Row3: same block (3,4)(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (4,6) same as input Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => Y at (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => Y at (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So the original artifacts at (1,6) and (4,6) remain, and new Y's appear further along same diagonal direction: (0,7) is up-right from (1,6) (i.e., moving up one row, right one column). Similarly (5,7) is down-right from (4,6). Then continue: (6,8), (7,9). So they propagate outward until hitting edge. Thus rule: For each Y that is diagonally adjacent to the main compact mass (maybe defined as the largest connected component?), we extend a line of Y's outward along that diagonal direction, adding new Y's each step until reaching grid boundary. The original Y's stay. Now test input uses color A (azure). Need to apply same rule with A instead of Y. Identify compact mass and diagonal artifacts. Input grid: Rows: 0: all . 1: all . 2: all . 3: ". . . . . A . . . ." => A at (3,5) 4: ". . . A A . . . . ." => A at (4,3) and (4,4) 5: ". . . A A . . . . ." => A at (5,3) and (5,4) 6: ". . A . . A . . . ." => A at (6,2) and (6,5) 7-9 empty. Let's map positions. We have a 2x2 block at rows4-5, cols3-4 (positions (4,3),(4,4),(5,3),(5,4)). That's the compact mass. Now other A's: (3,5) is up-right diagonal from (4,4) (since (3,5) = (4-1,4+1)). That's a diagonal adjacency artifact. (6,2) is down-left diagonal from (5,3) (since (6,2) = (5+1,3-1)). That's another artifact. (6,5) is down-right diagonal from (5,4) (since (6,5) = (5+1,4+1)). That's another artifact. So we have three artifacts at different diagonal directions: up-right, down-left, down- ... [2159 chars truncated]
"An anchored buoy bobs in the water, and the wake from passing swells catches its mooring lines, sending ripples racing diagonally toward the distant shore."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A square buoy float sits in the water with initial ripple crests forming at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each ripple propagates diagonally away from the buoy, advancing one wave-length per step, until it reaches the shoreline at the grid's edge.
Grid: 10x10 dark ocean surface, buoy and ripples in one color.
"A chip sits on the circuit board, and certain pins have fired—current races diagonally along trace lines toward the edge connectors of the PCB."
120b: k=1
See: A square integrated circuit occupies the board with active signal pins at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each active pin drives current along its diagonal trace, lighting up one via per step, until the signal reaches the board's edge connector.
Grid: 10x10 dark PCB, all active copper in one color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with Y's placed. Output shows Y's shifted? Let's map coordinates. Use (row, col) 0-index. Input Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) Output Y positions: Row0: col7 Row1: col6 Row2: col4,5 Row3: col4,5 Row4: col6 Row5: col7 Row6: col8 Row7: col9 So pattern: original Y cluster (a shape) seems to be moved diagonally down-right? Let's see original cluster rows1-4. Output cluster rows0-7 includes original plus extended diagonal line from top-left? Actually output includes original Y's but also new Y's extending a diagonal line from (0,7) down to (7,9). The original Y's at (1,6),(2,4,5),(3,4,5),(4,6) are present in output? Check: output has Y at (1,6) yes. (2,4,5) yes. (3,4,5) yes. (4,6) yes. So original Y's unchanged. Additional Y's added at (0,7),(5,7),(6,8),(7,9). That's a diagonal line starting from one step up-right from the topmost Y? The topmost Y in input is at (1,6). One step up-right is (0,7) which appears. Then continue down-right each step until hitting edge? Starting from (0,7) go down-right: (1,8) but that's not present. Wait they have (5,7) not (1,8). Let's examine pattern: maybe each active pin at diagonal corners of a square integrated circuit? The description: square integrated circuit occupies board with active signal pins at certain diagonal corners. Each active pin drives current along its diagonal trace, lighting up one via per step, until the signal reaches the board's edge connector. Interpretation: Input has some colored cells representing active pins? The shape maybe a square region of non-black? In example, Y's form a shape maybe representing a square? Let's view shape: coordinates: (1,6) isolated top right; (2,4,5) two adjacent; (3,4,5) same; (4,6) isolated bottom right. This looks like a diagonal line of two blocks? Actually shape resembles a "square" of size? Not clear. Maybe rule: For each colored cell, extend a diagonal line (south-east direction) until hitting edge, but only if the cell is at a "corner" of a contiguous block? In example, the Y at (1,6) is a corner of shape? It extends up-right? Actually they added (0,7) which is up-right from (1,6) (north-east). Also they added (5,7) which is down-right from (4,6) (south-east). Also (6,8) and (7,9) continue further SE from (5,7). So they extended from both topmost and bottommost corners outward along diagonal away from shape? The shape maybe a square oriented with corners at (1,6) and (4,6) and (2,4) (3,4) etc. The diagonal traces go outward from the shape's corners along the diagonal direction away from interior. Thus rule: Identify the minimal bounding box of colored cells (the "integrated circuit"). Determine its four corners (NW, NE, SW, SE). For each corner that has a colored cell (active pin), draw a line of that color extending outward along the diagonal away from the box until edge. In example, the shape's bounding box: rows1-4, cols4-6. Corners: (1,4) NW, (1,6) NE, (4,4) SW, (4,6) SE. Input ... [2989 chars truncated]
"A sacred altar stands at the crossroads, and from its corners the gods have cast bolts of divine fire, each one scorching a path diagonally across the mortal plane until it strikes the world's edge."
120b: k=1
See: A consecrated square altar sits in the realm, with divine sparks already placed at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each spark burns forward along its diagonal, igniting one tile per moment, blazing a trail until it reaches the boundary of the world.
Grid: 10x10 void, all sacred fire in one color.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input grid 10x10 with Y's placed. Output shows Y's shifted? Let's map coordinates. Use (row, col) 0-index. Input Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) Output Y positions: Row0: col7 Row1: col6 Row2: col4,5 Row3: col4,5 Row4: col6 Row5: col7 Row6: col8 Row7: col9 So pattern: original Y's form a diagonal line? Let's see original shape: looks like a diagonal line from (1,6) down-left? Actually positions: (1,6) then (2,4,5) then (3,4,5) then (4,6). That's like a shape maybe representing "sparks" at diagonal corners of a square altar? The description: "consecrated square altar sits in the realm, with divine sparks already placed at certain diagonal corners." So maybe there is a square region (altar) defined by some color? In example, maybe the Y's are the sparks at corners of a square? Let's examine shape: maybe a 3x3 square? Coordinates: The cluster of Y's maybe forms a plus shape? Let's draw grid 10x10 with Y's. Rows 0-9. Row1 col6 Y. Row2 col4 Y, col5 Y. Row3 col4 Y, col5 Y. Row4 col6 Y. So shape looks like two vertical lines? Actually there is a gap: row2-3 have Y at cols4-5 (a 2x2 block). Row1 has Y at col6 (right of block). Row4 has Y at col6 (right of block). So maybe the square altar is the 2x2 block at (2-3,4-5). The sparks are at its diagonal corners? The diagonal corners of that 2x2 block are (2,4) top-left, (2,5) top-right, (3,4) bottom-left, (3,5) bottom-right. Those are all Y's. Additionally there are Y's at (1,6) and (4,6) which are maybe "sparks" placed at diagonal corners of a larger square? Not sure. Transformation: "Each spark burns forward along its diagonal, igniting one tile per moment, blazing a trail until it reaches the boundary of the world." So each spark moves along its diagonal direction (NE, NW, SE, SW) from its starting position, leaving a trail (color) until hitting grid edge. In output, we see Y's extended along diagonals from original Y's. Let's test: Starting Y at (1,6). Which diagonal direction? Possibly down-right (SE) or down-left (SW) or up-right (NE) etc. In output, we have Y at (0,7) (row0 col7) which is up-right from (1,6). Also Y at (5,7) (row5 col7) which is down-right from (4,6) maybe? Wait (4,6) original Y leads to (5,7) in output? Actually output has Y at (5,7). That's down-right from (4,6). Also (6,8) down-right from (5,7) etc. So seems each original Y spawns a diagonal line outward away from the central block? Let's examine each original Y: Original Y at (2,4). In output, we have Y at (2,4) unchanged, also maybe (1,5)? No output row1 col5 is '.'; row0 col6 '.'; So no extension from that one? Actually maybe the central block is considered altar and not moving. The sparks are at diagonal corners of the altar (maybe the outer Y's). The central block is the altar itself (2x2). The sparks are at its diagonal corners? For a 2x2 block, diagonal corners are (2,4) top-left, (2,5) top-right, (3,4) bottom-left, (3,5) bottom-right. Those are part of altar, not s ... [6219 chars truncated]
"A pair of dancers holds a tight formation at the center, but soloists have broken away at the corners, each chassé-ing diagonally across the ballroom floor toward the far wall."
120b: fail
See: A compact square formation of dancers holds position, with solo dancers poised at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each soloist performs a series of diagonal chassé steps, advancing one position per beat away from the formation, until they reach the edge of the dance floor.
Grid: 10x10 dark ballroom floor, all dancers in one color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "compact square formation of dancers holds position, with solo dancers poised at certain diagonal corners." So there is a block (square) of same color (maybe 2x2?) and solo dancers at diagonal corners of that block? They move diagonally outward one step per beat until edge. Look at Example1: Input has Y's. Let's map coordinates (0-index rows). Input grid 10x10. I'll write positions of Y in example1 input: Row1 (index0) all . Row1? Actually row0 all . Row1 (index1): column6? Let's count: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at col6 (0-index). Row1 col6. Row2 (index2): ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => Y at col4 and col5. Row3 (index3): same as row2: Y at col4,5. Row4 (index4): ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at col6. Rows5-9 all . . So shape: a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5 (a compact square). Solo dancers at diagonal corners? There are Y at (1,6) which is up-right from block? Actually block's top-right corner is at (2,5). Diagonal up-right from that is (1,6) which matches Y. Also there is Y at (4,6) which is down-right from block's bottom-right corner (3,5) diagonal down-right is (4,6). So two solo Y's at the two right-side diagonal corners (top-right and bottom-right). No left side solos. Output: Y's have moved diagonally outward away from block. Let's see output positions. Output grid Y positions: Row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => block unchanged at (2,4),(2,5) Row3: same block (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (4,6) unchanged? Wait original had Y at (4,6). Output still at (4,6). Actually output row4 same as input row4. So bottom-right solo hasn't moved? But row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => Y at (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => Y at (7,9) Rows8-9 all . So the top-right solo moved from (1,6) to (0,7) (one step up-right). Then continues moving further? Actually after one beat? The description says they advance one position per beat away from formation until they reach edge. So they should keep moving each step until edge. In output we see a trail of Y's along diagonal from (0,7) down to (7,9). Wait includes original positions? Let's list Y's after transformation: positions: (0,7), (1,6), (2,4),(2,5), (3,4),(3,5), (4,6), (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). That's a diagonal line from (0,7) down-right to (7,9) plus the block. The original solo at (1,6) is now part of line (still there). The original solo at (4,6) also part of line. So they didn't move; they stayed but also new Y's added along the diagonal outward beyond them until edge. Actually the line extends beyond both solos outward in both directions? Let's see: top-right solo at (1,6) had outward direction up-right (north-east). It moved to (0,7) which is one step further outward. Then continues? Edge reached at row0 col7; next step would be (-1,8) out of grid, so stop. So we added Y at (0,7). That's done. Botto ... [4984 chars truncated]
"A volcanic plug of hardened magma sits in the bedrock, and fracture lines have already begun propagating diagonally from its corners, splitting the crust one stratum at a time toward the tectonic boundary."
120b: k=1
See: A solid square intrusion of igneous rock sits in the formation, with initial fracture points at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each fracture propagates diagonally away from the intrusion, cracking one layer per step, until it reaches the edge of the geological survey area.
Grid: 10x10 dark bedrock, all igneous material and fractures in one color.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming some shape. Output shows Y's shifted diagonally? Let's map coordinates. Use (row, col) 0-index. Input Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) Output Y positions: Row0: col7? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) Row3: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So original Y cluster at rows1-4 columns4-6. Output shows same cluster but also extended diagonally outward from the "intrusion"? The description: solid square intrusion with initial fracture points at certain diagonal corners. Each fracture propagates diagonally away, cracking one layer per step, until edge. In example, the Y shape looks like a plus? Actually shape: a 2x2 block at (2,4)-(3,5) plus two single Y at (1,6) and (4,6). That's like a shape with diagonal corners? The propagation appears to extend a diagonal line from the top-right corner (1,6) upward-right to (0,7). Also from bottom-right corner (4,6) down-right to (5,7),(6,8),(7,9). So propagation along the diagonal direction (down-right) from the rightmost column of the shape? Actually both top-right and bottom-right corners propagate outward in same direction (down-right for bottom, up-right for top). Wait top-right corner (1,6) goes up-right to (0,7) which is up one row, right one column (north-east). Bottom-right corner (4,6) goes down-right to (5,7),(6,8),(7,9) which is south-east. So propagation from each corner outward along the diagonal away from the "intrusion". The intrusion maybe the central 2x2 block? The fracture points are at diagonal corners of that block? The block's corners are (2,4) top-left, (2,5) top-right, (3,4) bottom-left, (3,5) bottom-right. But the Y's at (1,6) and (4,6) are not those corners. Actually they are one step away diagonally from top-right and bottom-right corners? Let's see: top-right corner of block is (2,5). Diagonal up-right from there is (1,6) which is present. Bottom-right corner (3,5) diagonal down-right is (4,6) present. So initial fracture points are at those diagonal positions. Then they propagate further outward along same diagonal direction. Thus rule: Identify a solid square (maybe any size) of a color (intrusion). Then find cells of same color that are located one step diagonally from the square's corners (i.e., adjacent diagonal cells). Those are fracture points. Then extend lines of that color outward from each fracture point along the same diagonal direction until hitting grid edge, filling those cells. In test input, we have color A (azure). Need to find a solid square intrusion of A. Let's map positions. Input grid rows 0-9. Row3: col5? Actually row index 3: ". . . . . A . . . ." => A at (3,5) Row4: ". . . A A . . ... [2654 chars truncated]
"A pat of butter sits in a hot pan, and the rivulets of melted fat race away from it along the scratches in the surface."
120b: k=2
See: A solid square of butter occupies the center, with droplets of grease already forming at certain corners.
Do: Each droplet traces a groove in the pan's surface, leaving a trail of grease one spot at a time in a straight line until it hits the rim.
Grid: 10x10 black pan surface, butter and grease in a single color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "solid square of butter occupies the center, with droplets of grease already forming at certain corners. Each droplet traces a groove in the pan's surface, leaving a trail of grease one spot at a time in a straight line until it hits the rim." So we have a central block (square) of a color (butter) and droplets (same color?) at corners? Actually in examples, the color is Y in example1, G in example2. Input shows a cluster of Y forming a shape: Let's examine example1 input grid (10x10). Y positions: row1? Actually rows indexed 0-9. Input lines: Row0: all . Row1: . . . . . . Y . . . Row2: . . . . Y Y . . . . Row3: . . . . Y Y . . . . Row4: . . . . . . Y . . . Rows5-9 all . So shape: a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5 (center-ish) plus a single Y at row1 col6 (above right) and a single Y at row4 col6 (below right). So central square of butter? The 2x2 block maybe butter core. Droplets at corners? The droplet at (1,6) is top-right relative to block? The block's top-left corner is (2,4). The droplet at (1,6) is above and right of block (top-right). The droplet at (4,6) is below right (bottom-right). So we have droplets at two corners (top-right and bottom-right). The rule: each droplet leaves a trail in straight line until rim. In output, we see Y's extended diagonally? Let's see output grid: Row0: . . . . . . . Y . . Row1: . . . . . . Y . . . Row2: . . . . Y Y . . . . Row3: . . . . Y Y . . . . Row4: . . . . . . Y . . . Row5: . . . . . . . Y . . Row6: . . . . . . . . Y . Row7: . . . . . . . . . Y Rows8-9 all . So original Y's remain, plus new Y's extending down-right from (1,6) to bottom-right corner? Actually from (1,6) we have Y at (0,7) in output (one step up-left? Wait coordinates: row0 col7 is above and right of (1,6) (north-east). That's a diagonal upward? The droplet at (1,6) seems to have a line going up-right to rim (top edge). Indeed (1,6) -> (0,7) is up one row, right one column. Then stops at top edge (row0). Similarly droplet at (4,6) extends down-right: (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). Yes output shows Y at (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). So each droplet creates a line in direction away from the central block towards the rim, moving one step per cell, staying same color, until hitting grid edge. Now example2: Input G positions: a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols2-3 (center). Plus a single G at row4 col4 (below right). That's only one droplet at bottom-right corner. Output shows original block unchanged, plus a diagonal line from that droplet down-right to rim: positions (5,5), (6,6), (7,7), (8,8), (9,9). Indeed output shows G at those positions. So rule matches. Thus central square is 2x2 block of color (butter). Droplets are same color cells adjacent to block at corners? They are at positions offset by one row and one column from block corners? In example1, there were two droplets at top-right and bottom-right corners. In example2, only bottom-right droplet. Now test input: color A (azure). Let's locate positions. Rows ... [2784 chars truncated]
"A resonant chord hangs in the air, and certain overtones escape from it, each harmonic climbing its own staircase of octaves until it fades beyond hearing."
120b: k=2
See: A cluster of sustained notes forms the chord body, with stray harmonics vibrating at its diagonal edges.
Do: Each escaped harmonic ascends step by step along its own diagonal staircase, one tone per beat, until it reaches the edge of audible range.
Grid: 10x10 silence grid, all sounding tones in one color.
We need to infer rule. From description: "cluster of sustained notes forms the chord body, with stray harmonics vibrating at its diagonal edges. Each escaped harmonic ascends step by step along its own diagonal staircase, one tone per beat, until it reaches the edge of audible range." Interpretation: In grid, there is a cluster (maybe a shape) of a color (Y in example1, G in example2, A in test). There are stray harmonics at diagonal edges: maybe single cells that are isolated? In example1 input: Y's positions: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows 0-9. Input1 Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) That's a shape: a 2x2 block at (2-3,4-5) plus two single Y at (1,6) and (4,6) forming vertical line? Actually (1,6) above right of block, (4,6) below right of block. So cluster maybe central block plus stray at diagonal edges? The output moves Y's along diagonal up-right? Let's see output1 Y positions: Row0: col7? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) Row3: same (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So original Y's at (1,6) moved to (1,6) unchanged? Actually output row1 col6 Y same as input row1 col6 Y. Input had Y at (1,6). Output also Y at (1,6). So that one didn't move? Wait output row0 col7 new Y appears, which wasn't in input. That seems like a new Y created moving upward-right from (1,6)? Actually (1,6) moving up-right would go to (0,7). Indeed output has Y at (0,7). So the Y at (1,6) moved up one step diagonally (north-east) to (0,7). But also remains at original? No original (1,6) still present in output row1 col6 Y. So maybe the rule is to propagate along diagonal until edge, leaving trail? Let's see: Starting from (1,6), we have Y at (1,6) original, plus Y at (0,7) (one step up-right). Then also Y at (5,7) etc? Wait other stray Y at (4,6) moved to (5,7) (down-right). Indeed output row5 col7 Y appears, which is one step down-right from (4,6). Also further down-right chain continues: (6,8), (7,9). So the Y at (4,6) generated a diagonal line down-right to edge. Thus rule: For each Y that is "stray" at diagonal edge of cluster, we extend a diagonal line outward from the cluster, moving away from the cluster, one step per row, until hitting grid edge, leaving the original cell unchanged and adding new cells along that diagonal. But why (1,6) goes up-right, (4,6) goes down-right. Determine direction based on which side of cluster they are on. The cluster is the 2x2 block at (2-3,4-5). The stray at (1,6) is above and to the right of block (north-east). So direction outward is further north-east (i.e., up-right). Similarly (4,6) is south-east of block, direction outward is down-right. Thus rule: Identify the main block (maybe the largest contiguous region of same color) ... [3817 chars truncated]
"A rugby scrum holds firm at the center, but breakaway runners have already peeled off at the corners, sprinting diagonally toward the try line without looking back."
120b: k=1
See: A tight pack of players forms the scrum, with individual runners positioned just off certain corners.
Do: Each breakaway runner continues their sprint diagonally away from the pack, covering one yard per stride, until they reach the sideline or end zone.
Grid: 10x10 pitch, all players and their paths in one team color on black turf.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming a shape. Output shows Y's shifted diagonally down-right? Let's compare. Input example1 coordinates (row, col) zero-index? Let's list Y positions: Row1 (index1): row1? Actually rows 0-9. Input lines: 0: all . 1: . . . . . . Y . . . => Y at (1,6) 2: . . . . Y Y . . . . => Y at (2,4),(2,5) 3: . . . . Y Y . . . . => (3,4),(3,5) 4: . . . . . . Y . . . => (4,6) others none. Output lines: 0: . . . . . . . Y . . => Y at (0,7) 1: . . . . . . Y . . . => (1,6) 2: . . . . Y Y . . . . => (2,4),(2,5) 3: . . . . Y Y . . . . => (3,4),(3,5) 4: . . . . . . Y . . . => (4,6) 5: . . . . . . . Y . . => (5,7) 6: . . . . . . . . Y . => (6,8) 7: . . . . . . . . . Y => (7,9) 8,9 empty. So original Y cluster (a "scrum") at rows 1-4 columns 4-6 shape. The "breakaway runners" are at certain corners? In input, there are Y's at (1,6) top right corner of cluster? also (4,6) bottom right? Actually cluster shape: a 2x2 block at (2,4)-(3,5) plus single Y at (1,6) above right, and (4,6) below right. So corners: top-right (1,6) and bottom-right (4,6). In output, these have moved diagonally down-right (south-east) each step until hitting edge? Let's see: (1,6) moved to (0,7)?? Wait that's up-right (north-east). Actually output shows Y at (0,7) which is one row up, one column right from (1,6). That's north-east direction. (4,6) moved to (5,7) (south-east). So top runner moved up-right, bottom runner moved down-right. So each runner moves away from the pack diagonally outward. The pack is the central block (2x2). The runners are at corners just off certain corners: top-right and bottom-right. They move away from the pack: top-right moves up-right (away from block), bottom-right moves down-right (away). They continue moving each step until they reach edge (sideline) or end zone (grid boundary). In output, they continue beyond one step: top-right continues further? Actually after moving to (0,7), next step would be (-1,8) out of grid, so stop. So only one step. Similarly bottom-right moved to (5,7), then continues to (6,8), (7,9) as seen in output rows 6,7 have Y's at (6,8) and (7,9). So they kept moving each stride until edge. So they left a trail of Y's along diagonal path? Yes they left Y's at each cell they pass through, not just final position. So we need to fill all cells along diagonal from start (runner) outward until edge. Thus rule: Identify "pack" as a contiguous block of same color (maybe 2x2) of at least 2x2? The runners are same color cells that are adjacent diagonally? Actually they are cells of same color that are adjacent orthogonally to the pack? In example, the pack is the 2x2 block of Y at (2,4)-(3,5). The runners are Y cells that are adjacent orthogonally (or maybe diagonally) to the pack but not part of it, located at positions that are one step away from pack corners? They are at (1,6) which is up two rows? Wait distance from pack: pack top row is row2, ... [4997 chars truncated]
"The eye of the storm is eerily calm, but at certain edges the wind has already found a crack, and it spirals outward in straight jets toward the horizon."
120b: k=1
See: A dense pressure center sits in the grid with wisps of wind already escaping at diagonal gaps.
Do: Each wisp extends into a jet stream, pushing one cell diagonally per step away from the eye until it dissipates at the grid's edge.
Grid: 10x10 dark sky, storm material in a single color.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming a shape: Let's map coordinates. Use rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input Y positions: Row1 (index1): col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => col6 (0-index). Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => cols4,5. Row3 same. Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => col6. So shape: a vertical line? Let's list: Row1 (r1): (1,6) Row2 (r2): (2,4),(2,5) Row3 (r3): (3,4),(3,5) Row4 (r4): (4,6) Now output grid: Y's moved? Output rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) unchanged Row3: same as input row3 (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) unchanged? Wait input row4 had Y at (4,6). Output row4 also Y at (4,6). So unchanged. Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So pattern: The Y's that are at "diagonal gaps" from a central dense pressure? The description: dense pressure center sits in grid with wisps of wind already escaping at diagonal gaps. Each wisp extends into a jet stream, pushing one cell diagonally per step away from the eye until it dissipates at the grid's edge. Interpretation: There is a central cluster (dense pressure) maybe the block of Y's at rows2-3 cols4-5 (a 2x2 block). The "wisps" are Y's at diagonal positions adjacent to that block: at (1,6) (top right diagonal), (4,6) (bottom right diagonal). They then extend further diagonally outward (down-right direction?) Actually (1,6) moves to (0,7) in output (one step up-right? Wait from (1,6) to (0,7) is up one row, right one column: that's north-east direction. Similarly (4,6) moves to (5,7) (south-east). Then continue further: (5,7) to (6,8) to (7,9). So the wisp at bottom right continues down-right each step until edge. The top right wisp moves up-right each step until edge (but only one step because edge reached? Actually from (1,6) to (0,7) then next would be (-1,8) out of grid, so stops). So rule: For each cell of the same color that is adjacent diagonally to the central block (maybe the "eye"), we propagate that color along the same diagonal direction outward until hitting edge, filling those cells (including original? In output original positions maybe shift? In output, original wisp cells are now empty? Let's see: Input had Y at (1,6) and (4,6). Output has Y at (1,6) still? Actually output row1 (index1) has Y at col6? Yes row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." So original (1,6) remains Y. Wait row0 had Y at (0,7) new. So original stays, plus new cells further outward. Similarly (4,6) remains Y, plus new at (5,7),(6,8),(7,9). So we extend outward from each wisp, not moving original. Thus rule: Identify a central cluster (maybe the densest region) of a color. Then for each cell of that color that is diagonally adjacent to the cluster (i.e., at distance 1 diagonal), extend a line of that color outward along that diagonal direction until edge, add ... [2612 chars truncated]
"Flying buttresses spring from the corners of a cathedral tower, each one arching diagonally outward to brace against the distant foundation wall."
120b: k=1
See: A square tower stands in the grid, with the first stones of buttresses placed at certain diagonal corners.
Do: Each buttress extends itself stone by stone along its diagonal, one block per row, until it meets the outer wall of the grid.
Grid: 10x10 empty lot, all stonework in one color.
We need to infer rule. Description: "square tower stands in the grid, with the first stones of buttresses placed at certain diagonal corners. Each buttress extends itself stone by stone along its diagonal, one block per row, until it meets the outer wall of the grid." Interpretation: Input has a central shape (tower) maybe a block of same color? Buttresses are initial stones placed at diagonal corners of the tower. Then we extend each buttress along its diagonal direction (down-right? up-left? etc) one per row until reaching grid edge. Example 1: Input grid 10x10 with Y (yellow) cells. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input Y positions: Row1 (index1): col6? Actually line: ". . . . . . Y . . ." that's row1 (0-index row1). So (1,6) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) Row3: same as row2 (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) So shape looks like a plus? Actually central maybe a 2x2 block at (2,4)-(3,5) plus two single Y at (1,6) and (4,6). That's like a tower? The buttresses maybe at diagonal corners of the central 2x2? The corners would be (1,3) top-left, (1,6?) Not sure. Output shows Y extended diagonally down-right from each original Y? Let's list output Y positions: Row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (1,6) (original) Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) (original) Row3: same (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) (original) Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So we see original Y's remain, plus new Y's added at positions (0,7), (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). That's a diagonal line from (0,7) down to (7,9) maybe? Actually line goes (0,7) -> (1,6) -> (2,5?) Wait (2,5) is original but part of central block. The diagonal seems to be from top-right corner of central block? Let's examine: The central block is at (2,4)-(3,5). Its top-right corner is (2,5). The diagonal down-right from (2,5) would be (3,6),(4,7),(5,8)... Not matching. Maybe buttresses are at (1,6) and (4,6) which are above and below central block, aligned vertically. Their diagonal extension maybe down-right for the upper one and up-right for lower? Actually (1,6) extended up-right? It got new Y at (0,7) which is up one row and right one column (north-east). So extension direction for that buttress is up-right (north-east). For lower buttress (4,6) extended down-right (south-east) giving (5,7),(6,8),(7,9). So each buttress extends outward away from tower along diagonal away from center. Thus the "tower" is the central block (maybe 2x2). Buttresses are the first stones placed at diagonal corners of the tower? In input, we have Y at (1,6) which is north-east corner relative to central block? Let's compute relative positions: central block occupies rows2-3, cols4-5. The diagonal corners of that block are: north-west (1,3), north-east (1,6), south-west (4,3), south-east (4,6). In input we have Y at ... [3008 chars truncated]
"A fortress holds the center, but sappers have already breached at the corners and now tunnel outward, digging one trench segment per day until they reach the battlefield's edge."
120b: k=2
See: A fortified square garrison occupies the field, with sapper units positioned at diagonal breaches.
Do: Each sapper unit digs a trench extending diagonally away from the fortress, one segment per step, continuing until the trench reaches the border of the map.
Grid: 10x10 dark battlefield, all military positions in one color.
We need to infer rule. Description: fortified square garrison occupies the field, with sapper units positioned at diagonal breaches. Each sapper digs a trench extending diagonally away from the fortress, one segment per step, continuing until trench reaches border. Interpretation: Input has a block (square) of a color (maybe fortress) and some cells of same color at diagonal positions (sappers). They extend diagonally outward (like from each sapper cell, draw a line of same color along a diagonal direction away from the block). In examples, color Y in example1, G in example2. Let's examine example1. Input grid 10x10. Y cells: positions: (1-indexed rows, columns) Row2 col7? Actually row2: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => row2 col7 = Y. Row3: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => row3 col5, col6 = Y. Row4: same row4 col5, col6 = Y. Row5: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => row5 col7 = Y. So shape: a 2x2 block at rows3-4 cols5-6 (center). Plus two Y at (2,7) and (5,7) which are diagonal from the block? Let's see: The block's top-left corner at (3,5). Diagonal up-right from (3,5) is (2,6) not Y. Diagonal down-right from (4,6) is (5,7) which is Y. Also up-right from (3,6) is (2,7) which is Y. So Y's are at positions one step diagonally away from the block's top-right and bottom-right corners? Actually block is 2x2. The "sapper units positioned at diagonal breaches" maybe are the Y cells that are one step away diagonally from the block's corners. In this case, there are two Y cells at (2,7) (up-right from top-right corner (3,6)) and (5,7) (down-right from bottom-right corner (4,6)). Also there is Y at (3,5) etc part of block. Now output: Y cells extended diagonally away from the block, one segment per step, until border. Output Y positions: Row1 col8? Let's list output grid rows: Row1: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (1,8) Row2: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (2,7) Row3: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => Y at (3,5),(3,6) Row4: same (4,5),(4,6) Row5: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => Y at (7,9) Row8: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => Y at (8,10) Rows9-10 empty. So we see a diagonal line of Y from (2,7) down-right to border: (2,7) already present, then (3,8?) Wait (3,8) is not Y. Actually line goes from (2,7) to (8,10) but includes (3,8)?? Not present. Let's examine: The output includes Y at (1,8) (above?), (2,7), (5,7), (6,8), (7,9), (8,10). Also block remains same. It seems there are two diagonal lines: one from (2,7) up-right to border (1,8) (since moving up-right direction). Another from (5,7) down-right to border (8,10). So each sapper Y extends in both directions away from block? Actually each sapper is at a diagonal adjacent to block; they dig trench extending away from block, i.e., continue same direction away from block. For (2,7), direction from block to sapper is up-right (since block corner at (3,6) to (2,7) is up-right). Continue further up-right: (1,8) then out of grid. So we add ... [5013 chars truncated]
"The lead actors hold their positions at center stage, but spotlight operators have caught a cue—each beam slides diagonally toward the wings, illuminating one floor tile at a time."
120b: k=3
See: A cluster of actors stands together with individual spotlights already hitting the floor at certain diagonal corners of the group.
Do: Each spotlight glides away from center stage along its diagonal, marking one tile per beat, until it reaches the edge of the stage.
Grid: 10x10 dark stage, all lit areas in a single color.
We need to infer rule: In examples, there is a cluster of same color (Y, G, O) forming a shape. The description: "cluster of actors stands together with individual spotlights already hitting the floor at certain diagonal corners of the group. Each spotlight glides away from center stage along its diagonal, marking one tile per beat, until it reaches the edge of the stage." Interpretation: For each colored cell that is at a diagonal corner of the cluster? Actually in example 1 input: Y's positions: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input1 Y positions: (1,6) (2,4),(2,5) (3,4),(3,5) (4,6) So shape: a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5, plus two single Y at (1,6) and (4,6) forming diagonal corners? The cluster maybe considered the minimal bounding box containing all Y? That box rows1-4, cols4-6. The diagonal corners of that box are (1,4) top-left, (1,6) top-right, (4,4) bottom-left, (4,6) bottom-right. Among these, Y already present at (1,6) and (4,6). The rule: from each existing Y at a corner, extend a diagonal line outward away from center (i.e., away from the cluster) marking cells until edge. In output1 Y positions: original Y remain? Let's see output1 Y positions: Row0 col7? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => Y at (0,7) Row1: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (1,6) same as input? Input had Y at (1,6). Output has Y at (1,6) still? Wait row1 col6 is Y, yes. Row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => (2,4),(2,5) same. Row3: same (3,4),(3,5) Row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => (4,6) same. Row5: ". . . . . . . Y . ." => (5,7) Row6: ". . . . . . . . Y ." => (6,8) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . Y" => (7,9) Rows8-9 empty. So we see a diagonal line of Y from (0,7) down-right to (7,9). That's extension from the top-right corner (1,6) moving up-left? Wait direction: Starting from (1,6) moving up-right? Actually (1,6) to (0,7) is up one row, right one column (north-east). That's away from center? The cluster center maybe around (2.5,4.5). The corner (1,6) is top-right relative to cluster. Moving away from center would be further top-right direction (north-east). That matches: (1,6) -> (0,7) -> then continue beyond? Actually after (0,7) next would be (-1,8) out of grid, so stops. But we also see a line from (4,6) bottom-right corner moving down-right (south-east): (4,6) -> (5,7) -> (6,8) -> (7,9). Yes. Thus rule: For each colored cell that is at a diagonal corner of the cluster (i.e., the extreme cells in the four diagonal directions), extend a line of same color outward along that diagonal direction until hitting grid edge, adding cells. In example2: Input G positions: (2,2),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3) 2x2 block, plus (4,4) single G? Actually input row4 col4 has G (since row index 4, col4). So shape: block plus a cell at (4,4) which is bottom-right diagonal from block? Let's list: block at rows2-3 cols2-3. Single at (4,4) is bottom-right corner of bounding box rows2-4 cols2-4. The corners: (2,2) top-left, (2,4) top-right (empty), (4,2) botto ... [4100 chars truncated]
"A mature shrub sits in the garden bed, and runners have already sprouted from certain root nodes, creeping diagonally across the soil toward the garden fence."
120b: k=1
See: A dense root ball forms a square mass, with runner shoots emerging at diagonal corners.
Do: Each runner extends one node at a time along its diagonal path, growing steadily until it reaches the edge of the garden bed.
Grid: 10x10 dark soil, all plant matter in one color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with Y's forming a shape: Let's map coordinates. Input example1: Y's at positions: Row1 index0? Actually rows 0-9. Input: row0 all . row1 col5 Y? line: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => col6? Let's count: positions 0-9. The line shows 10 entries. At row1, there is Y at column6? Let's index: columns:0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 .,9 . So (1,6). row2: ". . . . Y Y . . . ." => Y at col4 and col5. row3 same as row2. row4: ". . . . . . Y . . ." => Y at col6. others none. So shape: a vertical line at col6 rows1-4 (except row0). plus a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols4-5. Output: Y's moved? Output shows Y's at positions: row0 col7 Y row1 col6 Y row2 col4 Y, col5 Y row3 col4 Y, col5 Y row4 col6 Y row5 col7 Y row6 col8 Y row7 col9 Y Rows8-9 none. So original shape seems to have been "extended" diagonally down-right from each corner? Let's see: The original shape had a "dense root ball forms a square mass, with runner shoots emerging at diagonal corners." The dense root ball is the 2x2 block at (2-3,4-5). Runner shoots at diagonal corners of that block: corners are (2,4) top-left, (2,5) top-right, (3,4) bottom-left, (3,5) bottom-right. In output, we see extension of each corner along its diagonal direction outward until edge. Check: Starting from top-left corner (2,4). Diagonal direction up-left? Actually runner shoots emerging at diagonal corners, and each runner extends one node at a time along its diagonal path, growing steadily until it reaches the edge of the garden bed. So from each corner, we extend outward away from the block? For top-left corner, outward direction is up-left (decreasing row, decreasing col). But output shows Y at (0,7)?? That's not up-left. Let's examine each corner's extension. Look at output Y positions beyond original block: there are Y's at (0,7), (1,6), (5,7), (6,8), (7,9). These form a diagonal line from (0,7) down-right to (7,9). That's a line of length 8? Actually coordinates: (0,7), (1,6) is down-left direction? Wait row increase downwards. So (0,7) to (1,6) is down-left (row+1, col-1). Then (2,5) would be next but (2,5) already part of block. Indeed block includes (2,5). Then (3,4) part of block. Then (4,3) would be next but not present. Instead we have (4,6) Y (original). Hmm. Let's map original Y's: (1,6), (2,4),(2,5),(3,4),(3,5),(4,6). Output adds Y at (0,7),(5,7),(6,8),(7,9). So extension seems to be from the existing Y's at (1,6) and (4,6) maybe extending outward diagonally? (1,6) extends up-right? (0,7) is up-right from (1,6). Yes row-1, col+1. So runner from (1,6) goes up-right until edge (row0 col7). Similarly (4,6) extends down-right? (5,7) is down-right from (4,6). Then (5,7) further extends down-right to (6,8) and (7,9). So that runner continues beyond original? Actually (4,6) is part of original shape (vertical line). It extends down-right. Thus rule: For each cell of a particular color (Y) that has exactly one neighbor of same color in orthogonal direc ... [6447 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black background with exactly one non-black colored cell located somewhere in the grid.
Do: 1. Locate the single colored cell at row R, column C. Note its color. 2. Determine the parity (even or odd) of column C. 3. Move the colored cell down by one row to position (R+1, C). 4. Fill every cell from row 0 through row R (inclusive) with yellow, but ONLY at columns that share the same parity as C. All other cells in those rows remain black. 5. All rows below the colored cell's new position remain unchanged (black).
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input. The background is black (.). The coordinate system is zero-indexed with row 0 at the top and column 0 at the left. The grid contains exactly one non-black cell in the input.
"A beacon sinks one step into the earth, and its light rains upward in alternating columns like prison bars against the night sky."
120b: k=1
See: A single beacon glows alone in a dark field — a solitary flame in an ocean of night.
Do: The beacon is heavy; it sinks one step deeper into the ground. As it falls, it casts its light upward like rain falling in reverse, illuminating every other column above where it once stood — golden bars of light striping the darkness. The columns that catch the light share a kinship with the beacon's own column, stepping in rhythm with it (every other one). The sky above fills with these golden stripes, but the darkness below the beacon remains untouched, as light cannot fall downward from a thing that has already fallen.
Grid: The dark field keeps its original shape. Night is black (.), and the beacon's golden rain is yellow (Y). The beacon itself keeps its original color and identity. Only the sky above the beacon's resting place is painted — the ground beneath stays dark and silent.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5 with a single M at (row2,col2) zero-index? Let's map coordinates: rows 0-4, columns 0-4. Input shows M at row2 col2 (center). Output: Y . Y . Y in rows 0-2? Actually output grid 5x5: rows 0-2 are Y . Y . Y, row3 is . . M . ., row4 all . . . . . So rule: beacon (M) "sinks one step deeper" meaning moves down one row? In output, M stays at same position? Wait input M at row2 col2, output M at row3 col2 (one row down). Yes M moved down one row. The "golden rain" Y appears in columns that are every other column (alternating) above the new position? Let's see: Y appears in columns 0,2,4 (every other column starting at 0) for rows 0-2 (above the new M row). So Y fills all cells above the new M row, but only in columns that are same parity as M column? M column is 2 (even). The Y columns are 0,2,4 (even columns). So rule: after moving beacon down one row, fill all cells above it (i.e., rows less than new row) in columns that have same parity (even/odd) as beacon's column with Y. The rest remain unchanged (original colors). Also note that original M's original location becomes . (black) because M moved down, leaving empty. Indeed row2 col2 becomes Y? Wait row2 col2 in output is Y (since row2 is above new M row (row3) and column 2 matches parity). So original M location becomes Y, not . So the original cell is overwritten by Y if column matches parity. So rule: shift the special element (beacon) down one row (if possible). Then for all cells above the new position (i.e., rows 0 to newRow-1), set Y in columns where (col - beaconCol) mod 2 == 0 (i.e., same parity). Keep other cells unchanged (including other colors). In example, there were only black cells elsewhere. Now test input: 12x12 grid with a single G at row3 col5? Let's count: rows 0-11, columns 0-11. Input shows G at row3 (0-index) column5? Let's verify: line: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." That's row3, columns: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 G,6 ., etc. So beacon color is G (green). According to rule, beacon moves down one row to row4 same column5. Then we fill Y in columns with same parity as column5 (odd columns) for rows above new row (rows 0-3). Column5 is odd (5). So Y in columns 1,3,5,7,9,11? Wait columns 0-11, odd columns are 1,3,5,7,9,11. So for rows 0-3, set Y at those columns. However need to consider that original G cell at row3 col5 will be overwritten by Y (since row3 is above new row4). So final grid: rows 0-3 have Y at odd columns, other cells remain . (black). Row4 will have G at col5 (the moved beacon). Row5-11 remain unchanged (all .). Also need to keep any other colors? None. Edge case: what if moving down goes out of bounds? Not here. Thus produce output 12x12. Let's construct rows. Row0: columns 0-11: col0 ., col1 Y, col2 ., col3 Y, col4 ., col5 Y, col6 ., col7 Y, col8 ., col9 Y, col10 ., col11 Y. So pattern . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Row1 same as row0. Row2 same. Row3 same (since still above new row). Row3 originally had G at col5, bu ... [624 chars truncated]
"A single spore settles one layer deeper into the tissue, and from where it was, hyphae streak upward through every other vein, staining them gold as they reach for the surface."
120b: k=1
See: A dark tissue sample with a single colored spore embedded within it.
Do: The spore burrows one cell deeper. Golden hyphae grow upward from its origin through alternating veins, colonizing every row above where the spore once sat.
Grid: Grid dimensions unchanged. Background is black. The spore's color is preserved one row below its original position. Yellow fills columns sharing the original column's parity, from the top row down to the spore's original row.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5 with a magenta M at (row2,col2) zero-index? Let's index rows 0-4, columns 0-4. Input: row2 col2 = M. Output: same M stays at same position? In output, M is at row3? Wait output shows M at row3 col2 (0-index row3). Let's list output rows: Row0: Y . Y . Y Row1: Y . Y . Y Row2: Y . Y . Y Row3: . . M . . Row4: . . . . . So M moved down one row (from row2 to row3). Yellow Y fills columns sharing original column's parity, from top row down to spore's original row. Original column index =2 (even). Parity even columns: 0,2,4. Indeed Y appears in those columns rows 0-2 (top to original row-1? Actually includes original row? original row was 2, Y appears rows0-2 inclusive? Row2 also Y at col0,2,4. Yes includes original row. So Y fills from top row (0) down to original row (2) inclusive, in columns with same parity as original column (even). That matches description. Background black '.' unchanged elsewhere. Thus rule: find the single non-black cell (spore). Move it down one row (if within bounds). Fill Y in columns with same parity as original column, rows from top to original row inclusive. Keep other cells unchanged (black). If moving down would go out of bounds? Not needed. Now test input: 12x12 grid with a single G at row3 col5? Let's count: rows 0-11. Row3 (0-index) has G at column? Input line: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." Actually there are spaces. Let's count: columns 0-11. Sequence: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 . So G at (row3, col5). Column index 5 (odd). Parity odd columns: 1,3,5,7,9,11. We need to move G down one row to row4 same column 5. Fill Y in columns with odd parity, rows from top (row0) down to original row (row3) inclusive. So rows 0,1,2,3 get Y in columns 1,3,5,7,9,11. But note column5 originally had G; after transformation, that cell at row3 col5 becomes Y (since Y fills up to original row inclusive). Then G moves to row4 col5 (original row+1). So row4 col5 will be G (overwrites whatever Y would be? Y only up to row3, not row4). So final grid: all other cells black '.'. Let's construct 12x12 rows. Define columns indices 0-11. Rows 0-3: Y at odd columns. Row0: col0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y => ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" Row1 same as row0. Row2 same. Row3 same (original row). Note original G replaced by Y. Row4: we have G at col5. Also Y? No Y only up to row3. So row4: Y only at odd columns? No. So row4: all '.' except col5 G. So pattern: col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 . => ". . . . . G . . . . . ." Rows5-11: all '.'. Now ensure spacing with spaces between characters. Let's write rows. Row0: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Row1: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Row2: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Row4: . . . . . G . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row7: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . Row10: . . . . . . . . ... [104 chars truncated]
"A lone star collapses one shell inward, and the radiation it shed fans outward through every other spoke of the nebula, painting them gold from the core to the outermost rim."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark void with one colored star at a given position.
Do: The star shifts one layer inward. Golden radiation fills alternating radial spokes from the star's former shell all the way to the edge of the field.
Grid: Same dimensions. Black background. Star's color one row below. Yellow occupies columns matching the star's column parity, from the top row down to the star's original row.
"An anchor drags one fathom deeper, and above where it caught, phosphorescent tides glow gold through every other channel from the surface down to the anchor's old depth."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sea with a single colored anchor at some depth.
Do: The anchor sinks one level. Golden bioluminescence fills alternating water columns from the surface down to where the anchor previously rested.
Grid: Dimensions unchanged. Black background. Anchor color one row lower. Yellow in same-parity columns from row zero through the anchor's original row.
"A charged component drops to the next bus line, and above its former trace, current surges through every other wire in the ribbon cable, glowing gold from the header to the component's old socket."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark circuit board with one colored component at a certain node.
Do: The component shifts down one row. Golden current flows through alternating wires above the component's former position, from the top edge down to its old row.
Grid: Same grid size. Black background. Component color one row lower. Yellow in columns of matching parity from row zero through original row.
"A fallen god descends one step into the underworld, and from the threshold they left, golden chains hang from the heavens through every other pillar of the celestial gate."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark realm with one uniquely colored divine figure at a position.
Do: The figure descends one level. Golden chains appear in alternating pillars stretching from the highest heaven down to the threshold the figure just vacated.
Grid: Dimensions match. Black background. Figure's color one row below origin. Yellow in same-parity columns, top row through figure's original row inclusive.
"The soloist glides one step downstage, and in their wake every other floor light behind them fires gold, creating luminous stripes from the back wall to the spot they departed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage floor with a single colored dancer at one position.
Do: The dancer moves one row forward. Golden floor lights activate in alternating columns behind the dancer, from the rear of the stage to the dancer's former position.
Grid: Same dimensions. Black background. Dancer's color one row down. Yellow fills columns of same parity as original column, from row zero through dancer's original row.
"A mineral deposit subsides one stratum, and above the fault line it left, veins of gold ore crystallize through every other fracture, running from the surface down to the old deposit layer."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark cross-section of rock with one colored mineral inclusion.
Do: The inclusion drops one stratum. Gold ore fills alternating vertical fractures from the surface to the inclusion's former depth.
Grid: Grid same size. Black background. Mineral color one row below. Yellow in same-parity columns from row zero through original row inclusive.
"A single raisin sinks to the next layer of batter, and above where it rested, saffron bleeds upward through every other strand of pastry lattice, dyeing them gold."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sheet of dough with one colored morsel placed somewhere within it.
Do: The morsel drops one layer. Saffron threads rise from its former position, coloring every other vertical strand of lattice from that level all the way to the top crust.
Grid: Same dimensions. Black background. The morsel keeps its color one row lower. Yellow occupies columns matching the original column's even-or-odd character, filling from row zero through the morsel's former row.
"A struck note descends one step on the staff, and its overtones shimmer upward through every other string, turning them gold from the resonance chamber to the tuning pegs."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A silent dark staff with a single colored note placed on it.
Do: The note slides down one position. Golden harmonics ripple upward along alternating strings from where the note originated to the very top of the instrument.
Grid: Dimensions match input. Black background. The colored note sits one row below its starting position. Yellow fills alternating columns (same parity as the note's column) from the top edge down through the note's original row.
"A lone player drops back one yard, and the floodlights above their former position cast golden stripes down every other lane of the field, illuminating the turf all the way to the end zone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark playing field with one uniquely colored player standing somewhere on it.
Do: The player retreats one position. Golden floodlight stripes activate above their old spot, lighting every other lane from the far boundary down to where the player stood.
Grid: Same grid size. Black background. Player's color preserved one row lower. Yellow appears in columns sharing the original column's parity, filling rows from zero to the player's original row inclusive.
"A single ember drifts one notch closer to the ground, and above its old altitude, golden rain falls in alternating curtains from the cloud ceiling down to where the ember hovered."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky with one colored ember suspended at some altitude.
Do: The ember descends one level. Curtains of golden rain appear above its former position, falling through every other vertical channel from the highest altitude to the ember's old height.
Grid: Grid unchanged in size. Black background. The ember's color is placed one row below origin. Yellow fills every column with the same parity as the ember's column, from row zero through the ember's original row.
"A cornerstone is lowered one course, and above where it was laid, golden pillars rise through every other bay of the facade, from the foundation line up to the rooftop cornice."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark facade with a single colored stone set into it.
Do: The stone is reset one course lower. Golden columns spring up in alternating bays from the stone's former course to the top of the structure.
Grid: Same dimensions. Black background. Stone's color one row below original. Yellow in columns matching original column parity, from top row through the stone's former row.
"A general retreats one trench line, and from the abandoned position upward, signal flares illuminate every other column of no-man's-land in gold, all the way back to headquarters."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield with a single colored marker at some position.
Do: The marker falls back one row. Golden signal flares light up alternating vertical columns from the marker's old position to the rearmost line.
Grid: Dimensions preserved. Black background. Marker color one row lower. Yellow fills same-parity columns from row zero to original marker row inclusive.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5 with a single M at (row2,col2) zero-index? Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-4. Input: row2 col2 = M. Output: M moved down one row? In output, M is at row3 col2 (one row lower). Yes. Also Y (yellow) fills same-parity columns from row zero to original marker row inclusive. Original marker row =2. Same-parity columns meaning columns with same parity as marker column? Marker column =2 (even). So columns with even index (0,2,4) get Y from row0 to row2 inclusive. Indeed output rows 0-2 have Y at columns 0,2,4. Row0: Y . Y . Y matches. Row1 same. Row2 same. Row3 has M at col2, rest . Row4 all . So rule matches description. Also "Golden signal flares light up alternating vertical columns from the marker's old position to the rearmost line." That seems to be the Y columns from old position downwards? Actually they fill from top to original row inclusive, not to rearmost line. But description says alternating vertical columns from marker's old position to rearmost line. However example shows Y only up to original row, not downwards. Maybe "rearmost line" means bottom? But they didn't fill below. So maybe they fill from top to original row inclusive (i.e., rows 0..original row). That's consistent. Now test input: 12x12 grid with a single G at row3 col5? Let's count: rows 0-11. Row3 (0-index) has G at column 5 (since . . . . . G . . . . . .). Yes column index 5 (odd). So marker color G. Transformation: Move marker down one row (to row4 same column). Fill Y in columns with same parity as marker column (odd columns) from row0 to original marker row inclusive (row0..3). So columns with odd index: 1,3,5,7,9,11 (since 0-11). Fill Y in those positions for rows 0,1,2,3. Note original marker row is 3, inclusive. So rows 0-3 get Y in odd columns. But need to ensure not to overwrite marker? In output, original marker moved down, so row4 col5 will have G. The Y fill does not affect row4 (since only rows up to original row). Also note that original marker's column is odd, so column5 will have Y in rows 0-3, but row3 originally had G, now G moves down, so row3 col5 becomes Y (since Y fill). In example, original marker column had Y in rows up to original row, but at original row there was M originally, but after moving down, that cell becomes Y (since output row2 col2 is Y). Indeed row2 col2 is Y. So we follow same. Thus output grid 12x12: rows 0-3: Y at odd columns, . at even columns. Row4: same as rows0-3? No Y only up to row3. Row4 will have . at even columns, . at odd columns except column5 where G is placed. So row4 col5 = G, others . . Rows5-11 all . (black). Also note that original marker row was 3, so row4 is new marker row. Row5 onward unchanged. Let's construct rows. Define columns 0-11. Row0: col0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y => ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" Row1 same as row0. Row2 same. Row3 same (original marker row). So row3 also Y pattern. Row4: all . except col5 G. So columns: 0 ... [657 chars truncated]
"The lead actor steps downstage by one mark, and the spotlight grid above their former blocking fires every other gel in amber, washing the stage from the flies to the mark they left."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with one colored performer at a specific mark.
Do: The performer moves one position downstage. Amber spotlights activate on alternating overhead tracks, illuminating from the grid ceiling down to the performer's vacated mark.
Grid: Same grid. Black background. Performer's color shifted one row down. Yellow in columns of same parity as original column, rows zero through original row.
"A bulb is pressed one inch deeper into the soil, and from where it rested, golden shoots push upward through every other furrow, breaking the surface all the way to the garden wall."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark soil with a single colored bulb buried at some depth.
Do: The bulb sinks one row deeper. Golden shoots emerge in every other furrow above the bulb's former depth, growing upward to the top edge of the garden.
Grid: Grid same size. Black background. Bulb color placed one row below original. Yellow in same-parity columns from row zero through bulb's original row.
See: The input grid contains three types of cells: G (green), B (blue), and . (black/empty). The G and B cells form a fixed structural framework, while the black cells fill the remaining spaces. The black cells naturally form connected components — groups of adjacent black cells linked by orthogonal (up/down/left/right) adjacency. Some of these connected components touch the border of the grid (i.e., at least one cell sits on the first or last row, or the first or last column), while others are entirely enclosed within the interior, surrounded on all sides by G and B cells.
Do: 1. Identify all cells containing G or B. These remain unchanged in the output. 2. Identify all black (.) cells. 3. Find the connected components of black cells using 4-connected (orthogonal) adjacency — two black cells belong to the same component if they share an edge horizontally or vertically. 4. For each connected component, determine whether any cell in the component lies on the grid border (row 0, last row, column 0, or last column). 5. If the component touches the border, replace every black cell in that component with R (red). 6. If the component is entirely interior (no cell on any border edge), replace every black cell in that component with X (grey).
Grid: The grid is a fixed 10×10 square. Rows are indexed 0–9 from top to bottom, columns 0–9 from left to right. The border consists of all cells in row 0, row 9, column 0, and column 9. The grid uses colors 0–9 encoded as single characters; only G (green), B (blue), and . (black) appear in the input, and the output additionally uses R (red) and X (grey) in place of black cells.
"A walled city where open ground exposed to the wilderness beyond the walls catches fire, while sheltered courtyards remain in cool shadow."
120b: k=2
See: The grid is a fortified city seen from above. Green and blue tiles are the stone buildings and towers — permanent, immovable architecture. The dark empty spaces between them are open ground, bare earth where no structure stands. Some patches of open ground wind their way to the city walls at the grid's edge, forming paths that lead outside. Others are hidden courtyards, completely enclosed by buildings with no route to the perimeter.
Do: A wildfire sweeps in from the untamed lands beyond the city walls. Any open ground connected to the city's edge — where the flames can reach by traveling through adjacent clearings — ignites and burns red. But the courtyards sealed off deep within the city's stone heart are shielded from the inferno; they merely fill with ash-grey smoke, untouched by the flames themselves. The buildings stand fireproof, unchanged by the blaze.
Grid: The city is a 10×10 block. Its outer walls run along all four edges. Buildings appear as green and blue stones. The bare ground is black. Fire spreads only through orthogonal passages — it cannot leap diagonally between clearings. After the fire passes, exposed ground glows red and sheltered ground turns grey.
We need to infer rule: From description: green and blue are buildings (unchanged). Black '.' is open ground. Fire spreads from edge through orthogonal connectivity of '.' cells. Those reachable from edge become red 'R'. Those '.' cells not reachable (enclosed) become grey 'X' (ash). Buildings unchanged. Also note that in examples, some '.' become R, some become X. Also note that some '.' become R even if adjacent to edge via path through other '.' cells. Also note that some '.' become X even if adjacent to edge? Let's verify. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Let's map '.' positions. Output shows R for many '.' reachable, X for enclosed. Also note that some '.' become R even if adjacent to edge? Edge cells: first row, first column, last row, last column. In example1, first row: ". G . G . . B G G B". Output first row: "R G R G R R B G G B". So '.' at (0,0) became R (edge). '.' at (0,2) became R (edge). '.' at (0,4) became R (edge). '.' at (0,5) became R (edge). So edge '.' become R. Now interior '.' that are reachable via path become R. Enclosed become X. Let's test a known interior '.' that became X: In example1 row2 (index1) input: ". B B B B G . . B B". Output: "R B B B B G X X B B". So positions (1,0) edge '.' -> R. Positions (1,6) and (1,7) interior '.' became X. Are they enclosed? Let's see connectivity: They are adjacent to each other, but surrounded by B and G? Input row1 col6 '.' (index1,6). Adjacent orthogonal: up (0,6) is B (building), down (2,6) is G, left (1,5) is G, right (1,7) '.' . So no path to edge. So enclosed -> X. Thus rule matches. Now also note that some '.' become X even if adjacent to edge via other '.' that become X? No, they would become R if reachable. Thus transformation: For each '.' cell, if there exists a path of '.' cells (including itself) to any edge cell (i.e., any '.' on border) via orthogonal moves, then change to R; else change to X. All other colors unchanged. Now we need to apply to test input. Let's parse test input 10x10. I'll label coordinates (r,c) 0-9. Row0: "B . . B . B B B B G" Indices: 0 B 1 . 2 . 3 B 4 . 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 G Row1: ". . . G . G . B . ." 0 . 1 . 2 . 3 G 4 . 5 G 6 . 7 B 8 . 9 . Row2: ". B . G G . B G G G" 0 . 1 B 2 . 3 G 4 G 5 . 6 B 7 G 8 G 9 G Row3: "G B G B B . G G . B" 0 G 1 B 2 G 3 B 4 B 5 . 6 G 7 G 8 . 9 B Row4: "B B G . B G . B B ." 0 B 1 B 2 G 3 . 4 B 5 G 6 . 7 B 8 B 9 . Row5: ". G . B G . B B . G" 0 . 1 G 2 . 3 B 4 G 5 . 6 B 7 B 8 . 9 G Row6: "B B G . . G . G G G" 0 B 1 B 2 G 3 . 4 . 5 G 6 . 7 G 8 G 9 G Row7: "G B B B B G B . G B" 0 G 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 G 6 B 7 . 8 G 9 B Row8: "G . . . G G B . B B" 0 G 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 G 5 G 6 B 7 . 8 B 9 B Row9: "B . G B B . . . B ." 0 B 1 . 2 G 3 B 4 B 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 . Now we need to find '.' cells reachable from edge via '.' connectivity. Edge cells are those on row0, row9, col0, col9. Let's list all '.' on edges: Row0: col1 '.' (0,1) edge. col2 '.' (0,2) edge. col4 '.' (0,4) edge. Others? col? col? (0,0) B, (0,3) B, (0, ... [7408 chars truncated]
"A tissue sample under the microscope: green and blue proteins form a structural lattice, while the unpigmented interstitial fluid between them reacts differently depending on whether it can diffuse to the membrane edge or is trapped in interior vacuoles."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are fixed protein structures. Empty (black) cells are interstitial fluid filling the gaps between them.
Do: Fluid pools that have any contact with the cell membrane (the grid's outer edge) undergo an inflammatory response and turn red. Fluid pools completely sealed inside the protein lattice, with no path to the membrane, become inert grey deposits.
Grid: 10×10 grid. Green, blue, and black in the input. Green and blue remain; black cells become red or grey based on their pool's relationship to the outer edge.
"A star chart where green and blue stars burn steadily. The dark void between them either glows red where cosmic radiation floods in from the edge of the observable universe, or remains grey where stellar clusters completely shield interior voids from the radiation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are stars. Black cells are dark void between them.
Do: Cosmic radiation streams in from every edge of the chart. Void regions touching the edge, or connected to it through adjacent void cells, glow red. Void regions completely enclosed by stars, shielded from the edge, remain inert grey.
Grid: 10×10 star chart. Stars fixed. Void becomes red (irradiated) or grey (shielded).
"An archipelago where green and blue islands sit in dark open water. Tidal surges crash in from the ocean beyond the chart's edge, staining reachable waters red with churning sediment, while landlocked lagoons sealed between islands settle into still grey."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are islands. Black cells are open water.
Do: Tidal surges enter from all four chart edges. Water connected to any edge turns red with sediment. Water completely enclosed by islands, with no channel to the open sea, remains calm grey.
Grid: 10×10 nautical chart. Islands stay. Water turns red (tidal) or grey (landlocked).
"A circuit board where green and blue components are soldered in place. The bare copper traces between them either carry a red signal if they connect to any pin along the board's edge connector, or show grey if they form isolated loops with no path to any edge pin."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are soldered components. Black cells are bare copper traces.
Do: A signal is driven from every pin along the board's edge. Traces connected to any edge pin light up red. Traces forming closed loops entirely surrounded by components, disconnected from all edge pins, remain inactive grey.
Grid: 10×10 PCB. Components fixed. Traces become red (signal-carrying) or grey (isolated).
"A sacred grove where green and blue standing stones hold ancient enchantments. The unmarked earth between them either burns red where the curse of the outer wastes seeps in from beyond the grove's boundary, or rests in grey peace where the stones form a complete protective circle."
120b: k=3
See: Green and blue cells are enchanted standing stones. Black cells are unmarked earth.
Do: A curse radiates inward from the grove's boundary (grid edges). Earth connected to the boundary is corrupted red. Earth completely encircled by stones, sealed from the boundary, is protected and turns grey.
Grid: 10×10 sacred grove. Stones fixed. Earth becomes red (cursed) or grey (protected).
We need to infer rule. From description: green and blue cells are stones (enchantments). Black cells are earth. Curse radiates inward from boundary (grid edges). Earth connected to boundary becomes red. Earth completely encircled by stones, sealed from boundary, becomes grey (X). So basically treat black cells (.) as region; stones are G and B (green and blue). The boundary is outer edge of grid. Perform flood fill from boundary through black cells (.) only? But also maybe through other colors? The curse radiates inward from boundary through earth (black) only, not through stones. So any black cell reachable from any edge via adjacent (4-direction) black cells becomes red (R). Any black cell not reachable (i.e., enclosed by stones) becomes grey (X). Also note that in outputs, some original stones remain unchanged (G, B). Also some original black cells become R or X. Let's verify with examples. Example1 Input size 10x10. Let's examine first row: ". G . G . . B G G B". Output first row: "R G R G R R B G G B". So black cells at positions 1,3,5,6 become R (since they are on boundary). Indeed they are reachable from edge (they are edge cells). Good. Second row input: ". B B B B G . . B B". Output: "R B B B B G X X B B". The black cells at col1 (edge) becomes R. The black cells at col7,8 (positions 7,8) are interior but maybe enclosed? Let's see: row2 col7 is '.' originally, adjacent to row1 col7 is B (stone), row2 col6 is G (stone), row3 col7 is G (stone), row2 col8 '.' adjacent to row1 col8 G, row2 col9 B, row3 col8 '.'? Wait row3 col8 is '.'? Input row3: ". G B . B . G . G .". So col8 is '.' (black). So row2 col8 is adjacent to row3 col8 black, which may be interior. Are they enclosed? The output shows X for both col7 and col8. So they become grey, meaning they are not reachable from boundary via black cells because stones block. Indeed they are surrounded by stones (B or G). Let's test connectivity: Starting from any edge black cell, can we reach row2 col7? Edge black cells are many. But there is a stone barrier? Let's map region: row2 col7 is adjacent left col6 G (stone), right col8 '.' (black), up row1 col7 B (stone), down row3 col7 G (stone). So only neighbor is row2 col8 black. Row2 col8 neighbor left col7 black, right col9 B stone, up row1 col8 G stone, down row3 col8 '.' black. So row3 col8 black neighbor down row4 col8 G stone, left row3 col7 G stone, right row3 col9 G stone, up row2 col8 black. So the black cells (2,7),(2,8),(3,8) form a small region isolated by stones, not touching boundary. So they become X. Good. Thus rule matches. Now also note that some black cells become R even if interior but connected via path of black cells to boundary. Example row3 col1 '.' becomes R in output? Row3 input first char '.'; output row3 first char 'R'. Yes reachable via column1 downwards etc. Now also note that some original black cells become R even if they are adjacent to stones but still connected to boundary. Thus algorithm: For each black c ... [8903 chars truncated]
"A ballroom floor where green and blue dancers stand in formation. The empty spaces between them either flush red as the spotlight sweeps in from every doorway along the room's walls, or remain in grey dimness where dancers' bodies completely block the light from reaching interior gaps."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are dancers in position. Black cells are empty floor.
Do: Spotlights blaze through every doorway along the ballroom walls (grid edges). Empty floor reachable from any wall lights up red. Empty floor completely enclosed by dancers, with no sightline to any wall, stays in grey shadow.
Grid: 10×10 ballroom. Dancers stay. Empty floor becomes red (spotlit) or grey (shadowed).
"A cross-section of bedrock where green and blue mineral veins are crystallized in place. The porous rock between them either fills with red magma seeping in from the exposed surface along every edge of the formation, or remains grey where mineral veins completely seal off interior cavities from the surface."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are mineral veins. Black cells are porous rock.
Do: Magma intrudes from the exposed surface (all four grid edges). Porous rock connected to any edge fills with red magma. Porous rock completely sealed off by mineral veins, with no path to the surface, stays cool grey.
Grid: 10×10 geological cross-section. Mineral veins stay. Porous rock becomes red (magma-filled) or grey (sealed).
"A mosaic pastry where the glaze seeps in from the edges of the pan, staining exposed dough red, while pockets of dough sealed beneath decorative toppings stay pale and unglazed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are baked toppings arranged on the pastry surface. Black cells are bare dough visible between them.
Do: Pour red glaze into the pan. It flows between toppings and stains any patch of dough it can reach from the pan's rim. Dough patches completely enclosed by toppings, unreachable from the rim, remain unglazed and turn pale grey.
Grid: 10×10 baking pan. Toppings (green, blue) are fixed. Bare dough becomes red (glaze-reached) or grey (sealed off).
"An orchestra hall where green and blue instruments hold their notes steady, while the silent rests between them either echo with the roar of the audience outside or settle into the muffled quiet of soundproofed inner chambers."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are instruments sustaining their tones. Black cells are rests — silent gaps in the score arranged across the hall.
Do: Audience noise bleeds in from every entrance along the hall's perimeter. Clusters of silent rests connected to any entrance absorb the noise and resonate red. Rest clusters fully enclosed by instruments, cut off from every entrance, remain in muted grey silence.
Grid: 10×10 concert hall grid. Instruments stay. Rests become red (noise-exposed) or grey (soundproofed).
"A playing field where green and blue players form a living wall, and the open spaces between them either connect to the sidelines — letting fans rush in and paint the grass red — or are completely corralled pockets where the turf stays scuffed grey."
120b: k=2
See: Green and blue cells are players standing in formation. Black cells are open grass between them.
Do: Fans flood in from every sideline and endzone (grid border). Any open grass patch they can reach by flowing between players turns red with their banners. Grass patches completely surrounded by players, with no path to any sideline, remain grey and undisturbed.
Grid: 10×10 field. Players fixed. Open grass turns red (fan-accessible) or grey (enclosed).
We need to infer rule: From description: green and blue cells are players (fixed). Black cells are open grass. Fans flood from border (grid edges) through black cells (open) and turn them red if reachable. Black cells that are completely enclosed by players (green/blue) with no path to border become grey (X). Also note that some cells originally not black (maybe other colors) remain unchanged? In examples, input includes . (black), G, B, maybe other colors? Output shows R for red, X for grey, other colors unchanged (G, B). Also note that some original black cells become R or X. Also some original non-black cells become R? Let's check Example1: Input first row: ". G . G . . B G G B". Output first row: "R G R G R R B G G B". So black cells at positions 1,3,5,6 become R (since reachable). Good. No X in first row. Check interior: Example1 row2: ". B B B B G . . B B" -> output "R B B B B G X X B B". So black at col1 becomes R (border reachable). Black at col7,8 become X (enclosed). Indeed they are surrounded by B and G? Let's see grid: row2 col7 is '.' originally, row2 col8 '.'; they are adjacent to each other and maybe enclosed by players. So rule matches. Thus algorithm: treat grid as graph of cells that are '.' (black) only. Starting from any '.' on border (any cell on outermost row or column), perform flood fill through adjacent '.' cells (4-directional). Those reachable become R. The remaining '.' cells become X. All other colors (G, B, etc.) stay same. Check Example2 to confirm: Input row1: ". G G . G B . B B G" -> output "R G G R G B R B B G". So border '.' at col1 and col4 become R. Good. Check interior '.' that become X: Example2 row3: "B . B . . B G . G G" -> output "B R B R R B G X G G". Here '.' at col2 becomes R (border? row3 col2 not border but reachable via path?). Let's see: row3 col2 adjacent to row2 col2 which is G? Actually row2 col2 is G. Not '.' So maybe reachable via other '.' path to border. Let's examine grid: row3 col2 '.' maybe connected to row3 col4 '.' etc. Hard to verify but likely reachable. Check X positions: Example2 row4: ". . G G B G G G . B" -> output "R R G G B G G G X B". The '.' at col9 becomes X (enclosed). Indeed maybe surrounded. Thus rule stands. Now apply to test input. We have 10x10 grid. Let's label coordinates (r1..r10, c1..c10). Input: Row1: "B . . B . B B B B G" Row2: ". . . G . G . B . ." Row3: ". B . G G . B G G G" Row4: "G B G B B . G G . B" Row5: "B B G . B G . B B ." Row6: ". G . B G . B B . G" Row7: "B B G . . G . G G G" Row8: "G B B B B G B . G B" Row9: "G . . . G G B . B B" Row10:"B . G B B . . . B ." We need to identify '.' cells (black). Determine which are reachable from border via '.' adjacency. Let's map grid with coordinates. I'll create a table marking each cell type: B (blue), G (green), . (black), others none. Row1: c1 B c2 . c3 . c4 B c5 . c6 B c7 B c8 B c9 B c10 G Row2: c1 . c2 . c3 . c4 G c5 . c6 G c7 . c8 B c9 . c10 . Row3: c1 . c2 B c3 . c4 G c5 G c6 . c ... [7490 chars truncated]
"A landscape of green forests and blue lakes where storm winds sweep in from every horizon, turning exposed clearings an angry red, while clearings nestled deep within the canopy sit in the grey calm of the eye."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are forests and lakes — solid terrain. Black cells are open clearings between them.
Do: A storm rolls in from all four horizons (the grid's edges). Wind penetrates any clearing that connects to the border, turning it red with churning dust. Clearings completely sheltered by surrounding terrain, with no wind corridor to any edge, settle into grey stillness.
Grid: 10×10 landscape. Terrain is fixed. Clearings become red (storm-exposed) or grey (sheltered).
"A floor plan where load-bearing green and blue pillars define the structure, and the open floor space between them is either exposed to the building's facade — letting daylight flood it red — or sealed in windowless interior rooms that glow only with grey fluorescent light."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are structural pillars. Black cells are open floor space between them.
Do: Sunlight enters from every exterior wall (grid perimeter). Floor areas connected to any exterior wall turn red with warm daylight. Floor areas completely enclosed by pillars with no line of adjacency to any exterior wall are lit in cool grey.
Grid: 10×10 floor plan. Pillars stay. Floor space becomes red (daylit) or grey (interior).
"A battlefield grid where green and blue fortifications stand firm. The no-man's-land between them either bleeds red where it faces the hostile frontier beyond the map's edge, or lies in grey shadow where it is completely enclosed behind fortification lines."
120b: k=2
See: Green and blue cells are fortifications. Black cells are undefended no-man's-land.
Do: Enemy fire pours in from the frontier (every edge of the grid). Any stretch of no-man's-land that connects to the frontier absorbs fire and turns red. Stretches completely enclosed by fortifications, isolated from the frontier, remain in grey safety.
Grid: 10×10 battle grid. Fortifications fixed. No-man's-land becomes red (under fire) or grey (protected).
We need to infer rule: Input grid with colors: . black, G green, B blue, maybe others. Output: some cells become R (red) or X (grey) while others unchanged. According to description: green and blue are fortifications (stay same). Black cells are no-man's-land. Fire from frontier (edges) spreads through connected black cells (4-directionally) that are reachable from any edge. Those become red. Black cells that are completely enclosed by fortifications (i.e., not reachable from edge) become grey (X). Also maybe some black cells adjacent to red become red? But rule: any stretch of no-man's-land that connects to frontier absorbs fire and turns red. Stretches completely enclosed remain grey. Thus we need to identify connected components of black cells (.) in input. For each component, if any cell touches border (grid edge), then all cells in that component become R in output. Else become X. Also note that in examples, some black cells become R, some become X, while other colors unchanged (G, B remain same). Let's verify with Example1. We need to test quickly: Example1 input grid 10x10. Let's locate black cells '.'. I'll map coordinates row1..10, col1..10. Row1: ". G . G . . B G G B" Positions: 1 '.' (edge) -> component touches edge => should become R. Output row1 col1 is R indeed. col3 '.' also edge? column3 not edge but connected? Let's see adjacency: row1 col3 '.' adjacent to row1 col2 G (not black) and row2 col3 B (blue) and row1 col4 G, row0 none. So isolated black component of size1 not touching edge (since row1 is edge row, but column3 not edge? Actually row1 is top edge, so any cell in row1 touches frontier regardless of column. So row1 col3 touches top edge, thus becomes R. Output row1 col3 is R. Good. Row1 col5 '.' (col5) also top edge => R output row1 col5 is R. Row1 col6 '.' also top edge => R output row1 col6 is R. So matches. Now interior black components not touching edge become X. Let's check row2: ". B B B B G . . B B". Row2 col1 '.' (row2 not edge? column1 is left edge, so touches frontier => R. Output row2 col1 is R. Row2 col7 '.' interior? row2 col7 '.' adjacent to row2 col8 '.' and row1 col7 B, row3 col7 G, col6 G. This component includes col7 and col8 maybe. Are any of these cells on edge? row2 col8 '.' also interior (col8 not edge). So component not touching edge, should become X. Output row2 col7 is X, col8 X. Indeed. Row3: ". G B . B . G . G ." Row3 col1 '.' left edge => R output row3 col1 R. col4 '.' interior? row3 col4 '.' adjacent to row2 col4 B, row4 col4 '.'? row4 col4 '.'? Row4 is "G G G . . G G G . ." col4 '.' interior but row4 col4 maybe part of same component? Let's see connectivity: row3 col4 '.' adjacent up row2 col4 B (not), down row4 col4 '.' (yes), left row3 col3 B, right row3 col5 B. So component includes row3 col4 and row4 col4 and maybe row4 col5 '.' etc. Row4 col5 '.' also interior. Row4 col9 '.' interior? row4 col9 '.' adjacent to row3 col9 '.'? row3 col9 '.' is '.'? Actually row3 co ... [8315 chars truncated]
"A stage where green and blue set pieces stand fixed under the lights. The dark unmarked floor between them either catches the red glow spilling in from the wings and footlights at the stage's edges, or remains in grey shadow where set pieces block all light from reaching enclosed backstage pockets."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are set pieces on stage. Black cells are unmarked dark floor.
Do: Red stage light floods in from the wings and footlights (all four edges). Dark floor connected to any edge is bathed in red. Dark floor completely walled off by set pieces, unreachable from any edge, stays grey.
Grid: 10×10 stage. Set pieces stay. Dark floor becomes red (lit from edges) or grey (blocked).
"A garden bed of green shrubs and blue flowers, with bare soil between them. Spring rain runs in from every border of the bed, soaking exposed soil red with wet clay, while soil pockets fully enclosed by root systems stay dry and grey."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Green and blue cells are planted shrubs and flowers. Black cells are bare soil.
Do: Rainwater enters from every edge of the garden bed. Bare soil patches connected to any edge absorb water and turn red. Bare soil completely surrounded by plants, cut off from the bed's perimeter, stays dry and grey.
Grid: 10×10 garden bed. Plants fixed. Bare soil becomes red (waterlogged) or grey (dry).
See: The grid is 13 rows by 14 columns. Columns 2, 5, 8, and 11 are fixed separator columns filled entirely with black (.). The remaining columns form five 2-column blocks: block 0 (cols 0-1), block 1 (cols 3-4), block 2 (cols 6-7), block 3 (cols 9-10), and block 4 (cols 12-13). Every even row (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) is fully filled with the grid's color in every block. Each odd row (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) has each block in one of two states: 'full' (both cells are the color, e.g. M M) or 'dotted' (first cell is the color, second is black, e.g. M .). This creates a 6-row by 5-column binary matrix where 1 = full and 0 = dotted.
Do: 1. Identify the five 2-column blocks and the six odd rows. 2. For each block (column of the binary matrix), compute its column sum — the number of odd rows where that block is full (1). 3. Sort the five block-columns by their column sum in ascending order (fewest full blocks on the left, most on the right). Ties may be broken by preserving relative input order. 4. Reconstruct the grid: even rows remain fully filled across all blocks, separator columns remain black, and each odd row's block values come from the rearranged column order. The content within each block-column (which specific odd rows are full vs dotted) is preserved — only the left-to-right ordering of the block-columns changes.
Grid: The grid is always 13 rows by 14 columns. A single non-black color is used throughout (blue, orange, magenta, etc.). Columns 2, 5, 8, and 11 are always black separators. The grid has a rigid alternating structure: even rows are uniform, odd rows encode binary block states. The output grid has identical dimensions and structure.
"A talent show lineup where the shyest performers shuffle to the front."
120b: k=1
See: A stage is divided into five booths by black curtain dividers. Each booth has six spotlight moments (the odd rows) where performers can either stand tall and fill their booth with color, or shrink back into shadow, leaving a gap. Between these moments, the full chorus line blazes across every booth in unison. Each booth has its own personality — some performers are bold and fill nearly every spotlight, while others are timid, retreating into darkness more often than not.
Do: The stage director watches the dress rehearsal and counts how many times each booth's performer steps into the spotlight versus shrinks away. Then she rearranges the lineup: the shyest performer — the one who hid in shadow most often — is moved to the leftmost booth, and the boldest — the one who filled the most spotlights — takes the rightmost position. Each performer keeps their own unique pattern of courage and shyness; only their position on stage changes. The chorus-line moments remain untouched — everyone still shines together on those beats.
Grid: The stage is always thirteen rows deep and fourteen columns wide, lit in a single color against a black backdrop. Four black curtains hang at regular intervals, carving the stage into five equal booths. The chorus rows blaze uniformly; the solo rows reveal each booth's character — full presence or partial retreat. After the reshuffle, the stage dimensions and curtains remain identical, only the order of booths has changed.
We need to understand transformation. Input grid 13 rows x 14 columns. There are black curtains dividing into five booths. Black curtain likely columns of '.'? In examples, '.' is black. In input, pattern: columns: pattern repeats every? Let's examine example 1 input (not given but output shown). Actually we have only output for example 1. Need to infer rule: It says rearrange booths based on count of filled vs empty in odd rows (spotlight moments). The odd rows (1-indexed?) are rows 1,3,5,...? They are "solo rows" where each booth either full color or partial retreat. Even rows are chorus rows where all booths have uniform color across? In description: "Between these moments, the full chorus line blazes across every booth in unison." So even rows are uniform across all columns (same color). In example, let's check output rows: Row1: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. That's pattern of booths: each booth maybe 2 columns? Let's see curtains: four black curtains dividing into five booths equal width. Total columns 14, so each booth width =? 14 columns, 4 curtains columns are black '.'? That would be 4 columns of '.' dividing, leaving 10 columns for booths, not equal. Maybe curtains are single column of '.' between booths. So 5 booths => 5*? +4 curtains =14 => booths width = (14-4)/5 =10/5=2 columns each. Yes each booth 2 columns, curtains are single column '.' between booths. Indeed pattern: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. So each booth 2 columns of B (blue) in row1. Row2: B . . B . . B B . B . . B B. Let's parse: columns: 1 B,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 .,7 B,8 B,9 .,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 B,14 B. Curtain columns at positions 3,6,9,12? Indeed after each 2 columns, a '.' curtain column. Let's check: Booth1 columns1-2, curtain col3, booth2 col4-5, curtain col6, booth3 col7-8, curtain col9, booth4 col10-11, curtain col12, booth5 col13-14. Good. Now rule: For each booth, count in odd rows (1,3,5,7,9,11,13) how many times the booth is "filled" vs "shrink". What defines filled? In odd rows, each booth either fully filled (both columns same color?) or partially empty (maybe one column '.'?). In example, look at odd rows: rows1,3,5,7,9,11,13. Row1: all booths fully B B. Row3 same as row1. Row5 same. Row7 same. Row9 same. Row11 same. Row13 same. So each booth always fully filled? Actually row2 is even (chorus) but not uniform? Row2 has pattern B . . B . . B B . B . . B B. That's not uniform across booths. Wait description says chorus rows blaze uniformly across every booth in unison. That would mean all booths same color across entire row? But row2 not uniform. Maybe I mis-index: maybe odd rows are the "chorus rows" (full across) and even rows are solo rows. Let's test: Row1 (odd) is B B . B B . ... not uniform across whole row because curtains are '.' but within booths both columns B. So across booths, same color B. So yes chorus rows have each booth filled with same color (maybe varying per test). Row2 (even) shows variation: some booths have B . (one filled one empty) e ... [9456 chars truncated]
"A row of cell cultures in petri dishes, each showing different levels of colony growth across their sample layers. The lab technician reorganizes the dishes on the shelf so the sparsest cultures sit nearest the door and the most flourishing ones are pushed to the back wall."
120b: fail
See: Striped tissue samples in parallel dishes, separated by sterile dividers. Each dish has layers that are either fully colonized or show bare patches.
Do: Rank the dishes by how much life they contain—the emptiest migrate to one end, the fullest to the other—while preserving each dish's unique pattern of growth and bareness.
Grid: Five two-column blocks separated by black divider columns. Even rows are uniformly filled. Odd rows encode full or dotted states per block.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids are 13 rows? Let's count. Example input appears 13 rows, each row length? pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) space B(5) space .(6) space B(7) space B(8) space .(9) space B(10) space B(11) space .(12) space B(13) space B(14). Yes 14 columns. There are 5 two-column blocks separated by black divider columns? Wait black is '.'? Actually color key: .=black. So black columns are dividers. The pattern: columns: maybe pattern of blocks: each block is two columns of B (blue) with occasional '.'? Let's examine structure: The description: "Five two-column blocks separated by black divider columns. Even rows are uniformly filled. Odd rows encode full or dotted states per block." So grid has 5 blocks of width 2 columns each, separated by a single column of black '.' (divider). So total columns = 5*2 + 4*1 = 10+4=14 matches. Rows: maybe 13 rows? There are 13 rows in example. So there are 13 rows, maybe representing dishes? The rule: "Rank the dishes by how much life they contain—the emptiest migrate to one end, the fullest to the other—while preserving each dish's unique pattern of growth and bareness." So we need to sort rows (dishes) based on amount of "life" (colored cells) within each row? But they say each dish has layers that are either fully colonized or show bare patches. Even rows are uniformly filled. Odd rows encode full or dotted states per block. Let's analyze. In input, rows alternate? Row1: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (pattern: block1: B B, divider ., block2: B B, divider ., etc). Row2: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B (here within each block of two columns, there may be B and . pattern). Row3 same as row1. Row4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B (different). Row5 same as row1. Row6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B (different). Row7 same as row1. Row8: B B . B . . B . . B B . B . (different). Row9 same as row1. Row10 similar to row2? Row10: B . . B . . B . . B B . B B (maybe). Row11 same as row1. Row12: B . . B . . B B . B B . B B (different). Row13 same as row1. Output shows rows reordered? Let's compare output row order vs input. Output row1: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (same as input row1). Row2: B . . B . . B B . B . . B B (this matches input row2? Input row2 is B . . B B . B . . B . . B B. Not same. Output row2 has second block B . . B . . B B . B . . B B. Let's check input row6 maybe? Input row6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B. Not match. Input row12: B . . B . . B B . B B . B B matches output row2? Input row12: B . . B . . B B . B B . B B yes matches output row2. So row12 moved up. Output row3: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (same as row1). Row4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B (matches input row4? Input row4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B yes). Row5: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (row1). Row6: B . . B . . B . . B B . B B (matches input row6? Input row6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B not same. Input row8? Row8: B B . B . . ... [8130 chars truncated]
"Five stars in a constellation are each observed across six nights. Some nights a star flares brightly, other nights it dims. The star chart is redrawn placing the most frequently dim star on one edge of the constellation and the most consistently bright star on the other."
120b: fail
See: Five stellar objects separated by dark voids. Across observation nights, each star either shines at full magnitude or fades.
Do: Rearrange the constellation map from the dimmest star to the brightest, preserving each star's individual pattern of flaring and fading across the nights.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black void columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show bright or dim states per block.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids appear similar but some rows changed pattern. Let's examine structure: Input grid 13 rows? Actually example 1 input has 13 rows? Let's count lines: Provided input lines: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row1) "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B" (row2) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row3) "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B" (row4) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row5) "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B" (row6) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row7) "B B . B . . B . . B B . B ." (row8) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row9) "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B" (row10) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row11) "B B . B B . B . . B . . B B" (row12) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" (row13) Output rows 13 as well. We need to see transformation: It seems they are sorting "stars" (blocks) by brightness? The description: five two-column blocks with black void columns. So grid consists of 5 blocks each 2 columns wide, separated by a column of '.' (black). Indeed pattern: columns: 2 columns of color (B) then '.' then 2 columns etc. So total columns = (2*5)+(4?) Actually there are 5 blocks => 5*2=10 colored columns, plus 4 separating '.' columns = 14 columns. Indeed rows have 14 entries. Each block corresponds to a "star". Each star has pattern across rows (nights). Even rows uniform; odd rows show bright or dim states per block. Let's examine: In input, rows 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 are odd (1-indexed) and appear to have pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" i.e., all blocks bright (B). Even rows (2,4,6,8,10,12) have variations: some blocks have B B, some have . . etc. Goal: Rearrange the constellation map from dimmest star to brightest, preserving each star's individual pattern across nights. So we need to sort the blocks based on some measure of brightness (maybe count of bright cells across all rows). Then output grid with blocks reordered accordingly, but each block's internal pattern unchanged. Thus we need to compute for each block (2 columns) its "brightness" maybe total number of B cells across all rows (or maybe number of bright nights?). Then sort ascending (dimmest to brightest). In example, input blocks all same? Let's compute quickly: There are 5 blocks. Let's label block1 columns 1-2, block2 columns 4-5, block3 columns 7-8, block4 columns 10-11, block5 columns 13-14. We need to count B's per block across all rows. Let's parse rows quickly. I'll write rows with indices: Row1 (odd): B B | . | B B | . | B B | . | B B | . | B B So each block has B B. Row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B" Let's split: cols1-2: B . ; block1: B . col3 '.' separator cols4-5: . B? Wait row2 string: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B" Let's index: positions: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 B 8 . 9 . 10 B 11 . 12 . 13 B 14 B Now block1 (1-2): B . block2 (4-5): B B block3 (7-8): B . block4 (10-11): B . block5 (13-14): B B Row3 same as row1: all B B. Row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B" Positions: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 B 5 . 6 . 7 B 8 . 9 . 10 B 11 . 12 . 13 B 14 B ... [7494 chars truncated]
"Five ships in a harbor have each weathered a different number of storms in the past season. The harbormaster reassigns berths so the most storm-battered vessel docks nearest the breakwater and the least damaged one sits in the most exposed slip."
120b: fail
See: Five vessels in slips separated by dock pilings. Across several storms, each ship was either safely sheltered or took damage.
Do: Reassign berths from most battered on one side to least battered on the other, keeping each ship's specific storm history unchanged.
Grid: Five two-column blocks separated by black piling columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show sheltered or damaged states.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids of size? Let's count columns. Input example 1: appears 14 columns? Let's count: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 tokens. Rows 13? Actually list shows 13 rows. So grid 13x14. There are black columns (.) as separators? The description: five two-column blocks separated by black piling columns. So pattern: columns: block of 2 columns, then a black column, repeated 5 times? That would be 5*2 + 4 separators = 14 columns. Yes. Rows: even rows uniform; odd rows show sheltered or damaged states. So rows alternate: maybe odd rows have pattern of . and colors? Let's examine input row1 (row index 1): B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. That's uniform? Actually pattern repeats B B . .? It's B B then . then B B then . etc. That's like each block: two B's then a . separator. So row1 is uniform (all B in ship cells). Row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". This row has variation: within each block of two columns, there are patterns: first block: B . ; second column? Actually block columns 1-2: B . ; then separator column 3 is . ; block columns 4-5: B B ; separator column6 . ; block columns7-8: B . ; separator9 . ; block10-11: B . ; separator12 . ; block13-14: B B. So pattern varies. Thus rule: "Reassign berths from most battered on one side to least battered on the other, keeping each ship's specific storm history unchanged." Might mean we need to sort rows within each block based on some metric? Let's compare input vs output to see transformation. Take block1 (columns1-2). Input rows (13 rows) column1-2 values: Row1: B B Row2: B . Row3: B B Row4: B . Row5: B B Row6: B B Row7: B B Row8: B B Row9: B B Row10: B . Row11: B B Row12: B . Row13: B B Output block1 columns1-2: Row1: B B (same) Row2: B . (same) Row3: B B (same) Row4: B . (same) Row5: B B (same) Row6: . .? Wait output row6: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B" row6 columns1-2 are B .? Let's check output row6: "B . . B . . B . . B B . B B". Actually output row6 line: "B . . B . . B . . B B . B B". So columns1-2: B . (same as input row6? Input row6 columns1-2: B B? Let's verify input row6: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B". So input row6 col1-2 = B B. Output row6 col1-2 = B . .? Wait there is extra? Let's parse output row6 tokens: "B . . B . . B . . B B . B B". Count: 14 tokens. Let's index: 1 B,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B,14 B. So columns1-2 are B and . (instead of B B). So changed. Thus transformation modifies within each block maybe sorting rows based on number of B's? Let's compute for each row the count of B in block? Actually each block is two columns; each row can have 0,1,2 B's. The rule maybe to reorder rows within each block based on "damage" (maybe number of . vs B). "Reassign berths from most battered on one side to least battered on the other, keeping each ship's specific storm history unchanged." Could be swapping columns within each block? Not rows. Maybe we need to flip the pattern horizontally within each block: mo ... [9826 chars truncated]
"Five capacitors on a circuit board each discharge during different clock cycles. The engineer redesigns the layout so the capacitor that discharges most frequently sits nearest the ground rail and the one that holds charge longest sits nearest the power rail."
120b: k=1
See: Five component pairs separated by insulating traces. During each clock cycle, a capacitor either holds full charge or discharges.
Do: Rearrange the components from most frequently discharged to least, preserving each capacitor's individual discharge pattern across cycles.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black insulator columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show charged or discharged states.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids both 13 rows? Let's count. Example input appears 13 rows, each row length? pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) space B(5) space .(6) space B(7) space B(8) space .(9) space B(10) space B(11) space .(12) space B(13) space B(14). So 14 columns. So grid 13x14. Pattern: five two-column blocks separated by black insulator columns? The description: five component pairs separated by insulating traces. So likely there are 5 pairs of columns (2 columns each) with a black column (.) between them? Indeed pattern: columns: 1-2 B B, column3 ., columns4-5 B B, column6 ., columns7-8 B B, column9 ., columns10-11 B B, column12 ., columns13-14 B B. So pattern: [pair][ins][pair][ins][pair][ins][pair][ins][pair] = 5 pairs. Rows: even rows uniform? In example, rows 2,4,6,... maybe have pattern of . . etc. Let's examine row2 input: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". That's columns: 1 B,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 B,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 B,14 B. So within each pair, the two columns may be B and . or . and . etc. The description: odd rows show charged or discharged states. So maybe each pair corresponds to a capacitor with two columns representing two states across cycles (rows). The rule: rearrange the components from most frequently discharged to least, preserving each capacitor's individual discharge pattern across cycles. Interpretation: For each pair (two columns), we have a pattern across rows (13 rows). The pattern of B (blue) maybe indicates "charged" (full) and . (black) indicates "discharged"? Or vice versa. Need to sort the pairs based on frequency of '.' (discharged) across rows, descending (most discharged first). Then output grid should have pairs reordered accordingly, while keeping each pair's column order? Also preserve each capacitor's individual discharge pattern across cycles (i.e., rows). So we need to compute for each pair (columns i and i+1) the count of '.' across all rows (maybe per pair total). Then sort pairs by that count descending, and place them left to right in that order, with black separator columns staying as '.'? The separator columns are always '.' (black). In output example, we can compare ordering. Let's label pairs in input example (call them P1..P5). We'll compute number of '.' in each pair across rows. I'll write rows (13) for input (I'll index rows 1-13). Input rows: 1: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 2: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B 3: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B 5: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B 7: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 8: B B . B . . B . . B B . B . 9: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 10: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B 11: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B 12: B B . B B . B . . B . . B B 13: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B Now separate pairs columns: Pair1 columns1-2 Pair2 columns4-5 Pair3 columns7-8 Pair4 columns10-11 Pair5 columns13-14 Let's compute ' ... [7689 chars truncated]
"Five gods sit on thrones in a celestial hall, each having answered a different number of mortal prayers across six ages. The divine council reorders the thrones so the most neglectful god sits at the threshold and the most benevolent sits nearest the sacred flame."
120b: fail
See: Five thrones divided by pillars of shadow. Across several ages, each god either answered prayers fully or turned away.
Do: Reorder the thrones from least responsive to most responsive, keeping each god's specific record of mercy and neglect intact.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black pillar columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show answered or unanswered states per block.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's examine pattern. Input and output appear similar but some rows/columns changed. Let's analyze example1 with B (blue). Input grid size? Let's count columns: pattern "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) B(5) .(6) B(7) B(8) .(9) B(10) B(11) .(12) B(13) B(14). So 14 columns, 13 rows? Actually there are 13 lines in input (as shown). So grid 13x14. Pattern: seems to be 5 two-column blocks with black pillar columns? The description: "Five two-column blocks with black pillar columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show answered or unanswered states per block." Let's think: The grid appears to have repeating pattern of two columns of same color (B) then a column of '.' (black pillar). So each block is two columns of color, separated by a black column. So 5 blocks => 5*2=10 color columns + 4 black columns =14 total columns. Yes. Rows: there are 13 rows, maybe representing ages? The description: "Five thrones divided by pillars of shadow. Across several ages, each god either answered prayers fully or turned away." So each block corresponds to a god (color). Each row corresponds to an age (maybe). Even rows uniform (maybe all answered?). Odd rows show answered or unanswered per block. Looking at input example1: Row1 (index1) is "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" - all blocks have B B (i.e., answered). Row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". Here pattern: first block: B . (first column B, second column .) meaning maybe unanswered? Actually answered fully maybe both B's, unanswered maybe one B and one .? Let's see. Row2: columns: block1: B . ; block2: B B ; block3: B . ; block4: B . ; block5: B B. So pattern of answered (both B) vs unanswered (B .). Row3 same as row1 (all answered). Row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B". So block1: B . ; block2: B . ; block3: B . ; block4: B . ; block5: B B. So only last block answered. Row5 same as row1. Row6: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B". Wait row6: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B". Let's parse: block1: B B (answered); block2: B . (unanswered); block3: B . ; block4: B . ; block5: B B. So pattern. Row7 same as row1. Row8: "B B . B . . B . . B B . B ." Wait row8: "B B . B . . B . . B B . B ." Actually input row8: "B B . B . . B . . B B . B ." Let's parse: block1: B B; block2: B .; block3: B .; block4: B B; block5: B . (since last two columns: B .). So pattern. Row9 same as row1. Row10: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B" same as row6. Row11 same as row1. Row12: "B B . B B . B . . B . . B B" same as row2? Actually row12: "B B . B B . B . . B . . B B". That's block1 B B; block2 B B; block3 B .; block4 B .; block5 B B. So similar to row2 but first block answered. Row13 same as row1. Now output example1: Let's compare differences. Output row2: "B . . B . . B B . B . . B B". Compare input row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". So changes: block2 column2 changed from B to . (so block2 becomes B . instead of B B). block3 column1 c ... [9326 chars truncated]
"Five dancers in a chorus line each sit out a different number of routines during the show. The choreographer rearranges the lineup so the dancer who sits out most is at one wing and the one who performs every routine is at center."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Five dancers separated by gaps in the line. Across several routines, each dancer either performs or sits out.
Do: Rearrange the lineup from most absent to most present, keeping each dancer's specific pattern of performing and sitting out unchanged.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black gap columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show performing or sitting-out states.
"Five rock columns in a canyon each show different patterns of mineral-rich and barren strata. A geologist's cross-section diagram reorders the columns so the most barren formation sits on the left margin and the most mineral-laden one sits on the right."
120b: fail
See: Five stone columns separated by fissures. Across several strata, each column either shows rich mineral deposits or bare rock.
Do: Rearrange the cross-section from most barren to most mineralized, preserving each column's unique layering of rich and bare strata.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black fissure columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show mineral-rich or barren states.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids appear same size 13 rows? Let's count: Example input lines: each line has 14 entries? Actually pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns. 13 rows. Output also 13 rows 14 columns. We need to see transformation: seems columns are groups of two columns separated by a black fissure column? The description: five two-column blocks with black fissure columns. So pattern: columns: block1 col1-2, fissure col3 (black '.'), block2 col4-5, fissure col6, block3 col7-8, fissure col9, block4 col10-11, fissure col12, block5 col13-14? Let's verify: Input row1: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. Yes pattern matches: two B, then ., then two B, ., two B, ., two B, ., two B. So fissure columns are '.' (black). So each block is two columns of either B (blue) or maybe other colors in test. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show mineral-rich or barren states. Let's examine rows: Row1 (odd) pattern: B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (both columns in each block are B). Row2 (even) pattern: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B. That's not uniform across blocks? Let's see block1 columns1-2: B . (so one B one .). block2 columns4-5: B B (both B). block3 columns7-8: B . (B .). block4 columns10-11: B . (B .). block5 columns13-14: B B (both B). So even rows have some . (black) within blocks. The description: "Even rows are uniform; odd rows show mineral-rich or barren states." Hmm maybe opposite: odd rows have uniform (both same) within each block (both B or both .?) Actually row1 each block both B. Row3 same as row1. Row5 same. Row7 same. Row9 same. Row11 same. Row13 same. So odd rows are uniform (both same). Even rows have variation (one B one .). So transformation likely sorts columns (blocks) based on some property across rows: "Rearrange the cross-section from most barren to most mineralized, preserving each column's unique layering of rich and bare strata." So we need to reorder the five blocks (each two columns) based on some metric: maybe count of B (mineral) vs . (barren) across rows? Most barren (few B) first, most mineralized (many B) last. Let's compute for each block in input example: For each block (two columns), count B across all rows? Let's compute quickly. We have 13 rows. For each block, we can count B cells. Block1 columns1-2: Let's list rows: Row1: B B (2) Row2: B . (1) Row3: B B (2) Row4: B . (1) (Row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B": columns1-2 = B .) Row5: B B (2) Row6: B B? Row6: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B": columns1-2 = B B (2) Row7: B B (2) Row8: B B? Row8: "B B . B . . B . . B B . B .": columns1-2 = B B (2) Row9: B B (2) Row10: B B? Row10: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B": columns1-2 = B B (2) Row11: B B (2) Row12: B .? Row12: "B . . B . . B B . B B . B B": columns1-2 = B . (1) Row13: B B (2) Sum B count: 2+1+2+1+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+1+2 = 23? Let's add: 2+1=3, +2=5, +1=6, +2=8, +2=10, +2=12, +2=14, +2=16, +2=18, +2=20, +1=21, +2=23. Total cells 13*2=26, so 23 B, 3 . . Block2 columns4-5: Let's extract ... [9191 chars truncated]
"Five baguettes cooling on a wire rack, each scored with a different number of slashes. The baker lines them up for the display case, placing the least-scored loaf on the left and the most-scored on the right, keeping each loaf's unique slash pattern intact."
120b: k=2
See: Parallel loaves on a rack with dividers between them. Each loaf has segments that are either plump and uncut or bear a distinctive score mark.
Do: Rearrange the loaves by how many scores each one carries—fewest cuts to one side, most cuts to the other—without changing any individual loaf's pattern.
Grid: Five paired columns separated by black spacers. Alternating rows show either full or notched states per column pair.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Input and output appear similar but rows/columns rearranged based on "scores" per loaf? Let's analyze pattern. Grid size: seems 13 rows, 14 columns? Let's count example 1: Input lines have 14 entries (B B . B B . B B . B B . B B) that's 14 columns. 13 rows. There are black spacers '.' columns? Actually '.' is black. The description: five paired columns separated by black spacers. So pattern: columns are in pairs (two columns) then a black column '.' as separator? Let's examine: pattern B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. That's pairs of B B, then '.' separator, repeated. So total columns: pair (2) + separator (1) repeated 4 times? Actually we have 14 columns: pattern: [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B]? Let's segment: columns 1-2 B B, col3 ., col4-5 B B, col6 ., col7-8 B B, col9 ., col10-11 B B, col12 ., col13-14 B B. That's 5 pairs of B B separated by '.' (black) columns, total columns = 5*2 + 4*1 = 10+4=14. Yes. Rows also alternate? The description: Alternating rows show either full or notched states per column pair. Means each row may have pattern of B B (full) or B . .? Let's examine row2: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B. That's within each pair maybe first column B, second column '.'? Actually pair columns: columns1-2: B . (so B then .) ; col3 '.' separator; columns4-5: B B (both B) ; col6 '.' ; columns7-8: B . ; col9 '.' ; columns10-11: B . ; col12 '.' ; columns13-14: B B. So each pair can be either "full" (both B) or "notched" (B .) maybe representing a cut? The metaphor: loaves with segments plump (uncut) or score mark (cut). So each loaf (pair) has either both B (uncut) or B . (cut). The '.' maybe cut mark. Goal: Rearrange loaves by how many scores each one carries—fewest cuts to one side, most cuts to the other—without changing any individual loaf's pattern. Thus we need to sort the column pairs based on number of cuts (i.e., number of '.' within the pair across rows?). Wait each loaf is a column pair across rows? Actually each loaf is a column pair (two columns) across all rows (like a vertical loaf). The cuts are per row? The description: Alternating rows show either full or notched states per column pair. So each row may have a cut in a loaf (i.e., second column '.'), representing a score. So across rows, each loaf may have varying number of cuts (i.e., number of rows where second column is '.' vs both B). The rule: rearrange loaves (column pairs) sorted by number of cuts (fewest to most) from left to right (or maybe from one side to other). The output shows column pairs reordered. Let's test with example 1. Compute for each of the 5 column pairs (pair index 0-4) the number of cuts (i.e., rows where second column is '.'?) Let's compute quickly using mental? Let's list rows (13 rows). Represent each pair as two characters (colA, colB). We'll count cuts where colB is '.' (i.e., second column not B). Also maybe first column could be '.'? In inputs, first column of pair always B ( ... [8626 chars truncated]
"An orchestra's string sections are seated in five chairs, each player resting during different movements of the piece. The conductor rearranges the seating so the musicians who rest the most sit closest to the wings, and those who play nearly every movement sit center stage."
120b: k=2
See: Five musicians behind dividers, performing across several movements. In each movement a player either performs fully or sits silent.
Do: Reseat the players from most idle on one side to most active on the other, preserving which specific movements each one sits out.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black separators. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show active or resting states per block.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's examine pattern. Input and output appear similar but some rows changed. Let's analyze example1 with B. We have 13 rows? Actually grid size: seems 13 rows, each row length? Input lines have 14 entries? Let's count: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns. So grid 13x14. Pattern: There are five two-column blocks with black separators. Indeed columns: pattern maybe: block of 2 columns, then a separator column (black '.'?), but '.' is black. Actually '.' denotes black. So pattern: two columns of color (B), then a '.' column, then two B, then '.' etc. So pattern repeats: [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B] [.] [B B]? Wait 5 blocks of two columns each, separated by single '.' columns. That would be 5*2 + 4 separators = 10+4=14 columns. Yes. Rows: Even rows are uniform (maybe all B except separators). Odd rows show active or resting states per block. Let's examine row indices starting 1. Row1 (odd): B B . B B . B B . B B . B B (full active? all B in blocks) Row2 (even): B . . B B . B . . B . . B B (here within each block, pattern maybe: first column B, second column '.'? Actually block of two columns: columns 1-2: B . ; separator column 3 '.' ; columns4-5: B B ; column6 '.' ; columns7-8: B . ; column9 '.' ; columns10-11: B . ; column12 '.' ; columns13-14: B B. Hmm not uniform. But description: Even rows are uniform; odd rows show active or resting per block. However row2 is even (2) but not uniform. Maybe they consider rows with all same pattern across blocks? Let's examine more. Maybe the transformation is to sort the rows (players) based on number of active cells (B) per row, moving idle rows to top? Let's compare input vs output. Take example1 input row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". Output row2: "B . . B . . B B . B . . B B". So some changes: columns 4-5 changed from "B B" to "B ."? Actually output row2 columns 4-5: "B .". columns 7-8: "B B" (was "B ."). So they swapped within row? Let's compute per block: blocks are (col1-2), (4-5), (7-8), (10-11), (13-14). Row2 input block values: Block1: B . Block2: B B Block3: B . Block4: B . Block5: B B Output row2: Block1: B . Block2: B . Block3: B B Block4: B . Block5: B B So they moved the "B B" block (full active) one step to the right? Actually block2 changed from BB to B., block3 changed from B. to BB. So they shifted the active block rightwards. Row4 input: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B" Output row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B" unchanged? Wait compare: row4 output same as input? Input row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B". Output row4: "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B". identical. Row6 input: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B" Output row6: "B . . B . . B . . B B . B B". Let's compute blocks: Input row6 blocks: 1: B B 2: B . 3: B . 4: B . 5: B B Output row6 blocks: 1: B . 2: B . 3: B . 4: B B 5: B B? Wait output row6: "B . . B . . B . . B B . B B". Let's parse: columns: 1 B,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B,14 B. Blocks: 1 ... [8920 chars truncated]
"Five sprinters at a track meet have each competed in six heats throughout the day. The officials rearrange the lane assignments for the photo, placing the runner with the fewest wins in lane one and the most decorated runner in the outermost lane."
120b: fail
See: Parallel lanes separated by painted lines. Across multiple heats, each lane shows either a victorious finish or a stumble.
Do: Reassign lane positions based on total victories—fewest wins toward the inside, most wins toward the outside—keeping each runner's specific win-loss record unchanged.
Grid: Five two-column blocks divided by black columns. Even rows are uniform headers; odd rows encode win or loss per block.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids of size? Let's count columns: Example input first line: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 entries. So grid 13 rows? Actually lines count: 13 rows. So 13x14 grid. There are black columns (.) separating blocks. Two-column blocks separated by black columns. So pattern: columns: [col1 B], [col2 B], [col3 .], [col4 B], [col5 B], [col6 .], etc. So each block is two columns of colors (non-black) separated by a black column. So total blocks: (14+1)/3? Actually pattern repeats every 3 columns: two data columns then a black column. For 14 columns, pattern: 2 data, 1 black, 2 data, 1 black, 2 data, 1 black, 2 data, 1 black, 2 data? Let's compute: 2+1+2+1+2+1+2+1+2 =14. Yes 5 blocks of two columns, with black columns after each except last? Actually after last block no black column. So 5 blocks. Rows: odd rows are headers? "Even rows are uniform headers; odd rows encode win or loss per block." In description: Even rows uniform headers (maybe all same color?). In example, rows 2,4,6,... have pattern: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B etc. Not uniform though. Hmm. But transformation: "Reassign lane positions based on total victories—fewest wins toward the inside, most wins toward the outside—keeping each runner's specific win-loss record unchanged." Interpretation: Each block corresponds to a lane (runner). Within each block, each odd row indicates win or loss? Maybe a win is represented by a certain color (e.g., B) and loss by .? Actually black column is separator, not part of data. Within block, two columns maybe represent something like start and finish? Let's examine block 1 (columns 1-2). Input rows odd (1,3,5,7,9,11,13) have B B, B B, B B, B B, B B, B B, B B (all B). Even rows (2,4,6,8,10,12) have B . , B . , B B? Wait row2 columns1-2: "B ." (B then .). Row4: "B ." Row6: "B B"? Actually row6 line: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B". columns1-2: B B. Row8: "B B . B . . B . . B B . B ." columns1-2: B B. Row10: "B B . B . . B . . B . . B B" columns1-2: B B. Row12: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B" columns1-2: B . .? Wait row12 has 14 entries: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". columns1-2: B . .? Actually there are three entries before first black? Let's parse row12: tokens: 1 B,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 B,6 .,7 B,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 B,14 B. So columns1-2: B . (since column3 is . separator). So pattern: some rows have B . (maybe loss), some have B B (win). So each block's two columns maybe represent two possible outcomes? But we need total victories per lane: count of wins per block across rows? Let's compute for block1: count rows where both columns are B? That's wins? Let's count odd rows (1,3,5,7,9,11,13) all B B => wins? Even rows maybe represent something else. Let's compute total B B occurrences per block across all rows: rows 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 (7 rows) all B B => 7 wins. Even rows: row2 B . (loss), row4 B . (loss), row6 B B (win), row8 B B (win), row10 B B (win), row12 B . (loss). So total win ... [9648 chars truncated]
"Five weather stations along a mountain ridge report sunshine or fog for each hour of the morning. The meteorological atlas reorders the stations from the foggiest outpost to the sunniest, preserving each station's exact hourly readings."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A ridge of monitoring stations separated by rocky gaps. Each station logs either clear skies or fog at each interval.
Do: Sort the stations left to right from most fog-prone to most sun-blessed, keeping each station's individual hourly pattern of fog and clarity intact.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black separators. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show clear or foggy states per block.
"Five townhouses on a street each have a different number of shuttered windows across their floors. The city planner redraws the block plan, sliding the most shuttered house to one end and the most open-windowed house to the other, without altering any house's facade."
120b: fail
See: A row of narrow buildings separated by alleyways. Each floor of each building either has its windows fully open or partly shuttered.
Do: Rearrange the buildings along the street by how many shuttered floors each has—most shuttered to one side, most open to the other—preserving each building's specific floor pattern.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black alleys between them. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show open or shuttered states.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Input and output appear similar but some rows changed ordering of columns? Let's examine pattern. We have grid with 13 rows? Example1 input: appears 13 rows, each row length? pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) B(5) .(6) B(7) B(8) .(9) B(10) B(11) .(12) B(13) B(14). So 14 columns. There are black alleys '.' between blocks? Actually '.' is black (color key). The description: five two-column blocks with black alleys between them. So pattern: two columns of building color (e.g., B) then a '.' alley column, repeated 5 times => total columns = 5*2 + 4*1 = 14. Yes. Thus each building is a 2-column vertical slice (two columns) across all rows. The '.' columns are separators. The transformation: "Rearrange the buildings along the street by how many shuttered floors each has—most shuttered to one side, most open to the other—preserving each building's specific floor pattern." Interpretation: For each building (2-column block), count number of "shuttered floors" i.e., maybe rows where windows are partially shuttered vs fully open. In the metaphor, each floor either fully open or partly shuttered. In grid, maybe open = both cells same color? shuttered = one cell '.'? Wait '.' is black alley, not part of building. Within building, each floor is represented by two cells (columns). In examples, building colors are B (blue). The building cells are either B (blue) or '.'? Actually '.' only appears in alley columns, not inside building. In input, building cells are always B (blue) for example1. Wait there are also '.' inside building? Let's examine row2 of example1 input: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". This row has pattern: B (col1), space, . (col2)?? Wait we need to parse columns: The pattern includes spaces between characters for readability. So actual columns: B, B, ., B, B, ., B, B, ., B, B, ., B, B? No that's not right. Let's write row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". Let's split: B, ., ., B, B, ., B, ., ., B, ., ., B, B. That's 14 entries. So there are '.' inside building columns (since building columns are positions 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, 10-11, 13-14). Let's map indices: columns 1-2 building1, col3 alley, 4-5 building2, col6 alley, 7-8 building3, col9 alley, 10-11 building4, col12 alley, 13-14 building5. Now row2 entries: col1 B (building1 left), col2 . (building1 right) -> indicates partially shuttered? building2: col4 B, col5 B (both B) open? building3: col7 B, col8 . (partial). building4: col10 B, col11 . (partial). building5: col13 B, col14 B (both B). So each floor (row) for each building can be either both colored (open) or one colored and one '.' (shuttered). Possibly also both '.'? Not seen. Thus rule: Count per building across all rows the number of rows where the building is partially shuttered (i.e., exactly one '.' among its two cells). Then sort buildings by that count, moving those with more shuttered floors to on ... [9848 chars truncated]
"Five regiments stand in a battle line, each having taken different casualties across six engagements. The general redeploys them so the most depleted regiment holds the safest flank and the strongest regiment anchors the most exposed position."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Five units separated by no-man's-land gaps. Across several battles, each unit is either at full strength or has taken a hit.
Do: Reorder the battle line from weakest to strongest, keeping each regiment's specific history of losses and full-strength engagements intact.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black separator columns. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show full or depleted states per block.
"Five spotlight rigs hang above the stage, each programmed to dim during different scenes of the play. The lighting director rehang them so the rig that dims most often is furthest stage-left and the one that stays brightest is furthest stage-right."
120b: fail
See: Five lighting rigs separated by dark gaps above the stage. During each scene, a rig is either blazing at full power or dimmed down.
Do: Rearrange the rigs from dimmest overall to brightest overall, preserving which specific scenes each rig dims for.
Grid: Five two-column blocks divided by black columns. Even rows are fully lit; odd rows show bright or dim states per block.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids are 13 rows? Let's count. Example input appears 13 rows, each row length? pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) space B(5) space .(6) space B(7) space B(8) space .(9) space B(10) space B(11) space .(12) space B(13) space B(14). So 14 columns. There are black columns (.) separating blocks. The description: five two-column blocks separated by black columns. Indeed 5 blocks *2 =10 columns of colors, plus 4 black columns between them =14 total. So each block is two columns of same color? In example, colors are B (blue) for all non-black cells. So each block is just blue columns. But there are variations: some rows have '.' in some positions within blocks? Actually rows have '.' only in black columns? Wait there are '.' also within blocks? Example row2: "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B". That's B then . then . then B B etc. So within block, there are '.' representing maybe dim state? The description: Even rows are fully lit; odd rows show bright or dim states per block. Let's examine: Row indices starting 1? Row1 (odd) is "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B": within each block (two columns) both are B (bright). Row2 (even) is "B . . B B . B . . B . . B B": within each block, first column B, second column .? Actually block1 columns 1-2: B . (dim?). block2 columns 4-5: B B (both bright). block3 columns 7-8: B . (dim). block4 columns 10-11: B . (dim). block5 columns 13-14: B B (bright). So pattern varies. Goal: Rearrange the rigs (blocks) from dimmest overall to brightest overall, preserving which specific scenes each rig dims for. So we need to compute for each block its overall brightness (maybe count of bright cells across rows). Then sort blocks ascending (dimmest to brightest) and reorder columns accordingly, while keeping within each block the pattern of bright/dim per row unchanged. In example, input all blocks are same color B, but patterns differ. Output shows blocks reordered. Let's compute brightness per block in input. We have 13 rows. Let's label blocks 1-5. For each row, we have two columns per block. Determine bright cells (non-.)? Actually bright = B, dim = .? In description, even rows fully lit (maybe all bright). But row2 had some '.' so not fully lit. Wait description: "Even rows are fully lit; odd rows show bright or dim states per block." In example, row1 (odd) all B in blocks (both columns B). Row2 (even) has some '.' so not fully lit. So maybe opposite: odd rows are fully lit (all bright), even rows have dim states. Let's check row3 (odd) "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B": all B again. Row4 (even) "B . . B . . B . . B . . B B": many '.'. Thus odd rows (1,3,5,7,9,11,13) are fully bright (both columns B). Even rows (2,4,6,8,10,12) have dim patterns. Thus overall brightness per block is determined by number of bright cells across even rows (since odd rows always bright). So each block gets same base count from odd ro ... [9685 chars truncated]
"Five trellises in a garden each support climbing vines that bloom on different days of the week. The gardener rearranges the trellises along the fence so the one with the fewest blooms stands at the gate and the most floriferous one stands at the far end."
120b: fail
See: A row of trellises separated by fence posts. On each blooming day, a trellis either bursts with flowers or shows only leaves.
Do: Move the trellises so they progress from least to most floriferous, keeping each trellis's specific blooming schedule unchanged.
Grid: Five two-column blocks with black post columns between them. Even rows are uniform; odd rows show blooming or bare states.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids are 13 rows? Let's count. Example 1 input appears 13 rows, each row length? pattern: "B B . B B . B B . B B . B B" that's 14 columns? Let's count: B(1) space B(2) space .(3) space B(4) B(5) .(6) B(7) B(8) .(9) B(10) B(11) .(12) B(13) B(14). So 14 columns. There are black posts columns between blocks? The description: five two-column blocks with black post columns between them. So pattern: block of 2 columns (trellis) then a column of black (post) then next block etc. 5 blocks => 5*2=10 columns of trellis + 4 black posts =14 columns. Yes. Rows: even rows uniform; odd rows show blooming or bare states. In input, rows alternate? Let's examine row indices starting 1. Row1: pattern B B . B B . B B . B B . B B. That's maybe "blooming"? Row2: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B. Row3 same as row1. Row4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B. Row5 same as row1. Row6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B. Row7 same as row1. Row8: B B . B . . B . . B B . B . (different). Row9 same as row1. Row10 similar to row2? B . . B . . B . . B B . B B. Row11 same as row1. Row12: B . . B . . B B . B B . B B. Row13 same as row1. Output shows rows rearranged? Let's compare row1 output same as input row1. Row2 output: B . . B . . B B . B . . B B. That's different from input row2. It seems rows are sorted within each block? Actually transformation: "Move the trellises so they progress from least to most floriferous, keeping each trellis's specific blooming schedule unchanged." So each trellis (2-column block) has a pattern across rows (blooming days). Need to sort the trellises (blocks) horizontally based on some measure (least to most floriferous). Floriferous likely number of "flowers" vs leaves. In grid, maybe '.' is black (post) but within trellis columns, there are B (blue) maybe representing leaves? Actually color key: B=blue, . = black. In example only B and . appear. So maybe B indicates flower? Or maybe '.' indicates empty? The description: "On each blooming day, a trellis either bursts with flowers or shows only leaves." So two states: flowers vs leaves. Represented by B (flowers) and . (leaves?) But . is black, maybe leaf? Not sure. But we can deduce sorting: Input blocks order maybe not sorted; output shows them sorted. Let's extract each block's column pairs across rows. There are 5 blocks: columns 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, 10-11, 13-14 (since column 3,6,9,12 are black posts). Let's label block A-E. We need to compute "floriferousness" per block: maybe count of B's across all rows? Let's compute quickly from input. We have 13 rows. Let's list rows with columns. I'll index columns 1-14. Row1: col1 B,2 B,3 .,4 B,5 B,6 .,7 B,8 B,9 .,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B,14 B. Row2: B . . B B . B . . B . . B B => col1 B,2 .,4 B,5 B,7 B,8 .,10 B,11 .,13 B,14 B. Row3 same as row1. Row4: B . . B . . B . . B . . B B => col1 B,2 .,4 B,5 .,7 B,8 .,10 B,11 .,13 B,14 B. Row5 same as row1. Row6: B B . B . . B . . B . . B B => col1 B,2 B,4 B,5 ., ... [9124 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 3×11 grid divided into three 3×3 panels separated by single columns of grey (X). The first panel contains a colored pattern using several distinct colors. The second and third panels are entirely black (empty), waiting to be filled.
Do: Copy the first 3×3 panel into panel 1 unchanged. Fill panel 2 by rotating the first panel 90 degrees clockwise: read the columns of panel 1 from bottom to top, left to right, so that column 0 (bottom to top) becomes row 0 of panel 2, column 1 (bottom to top) becomes row 1, and column 2 (bottom to top) becomes row 2. Fill panel 3 by rotating the first panel 180 degrees: reverse the order of the rows and within each row reverse the order of the cells, so the bottom-right cell of panel 1 becomes the top-left cell of panel 3.
Grid: The grid is 3 rows by 11 columns. It contains three 3×3 content panels at column positions 0–2, 4–6, and 8–10, separated by single-column grey (X) dividers at columns 3 and 7. The dividers are fixed and never change.
"A dancer performs before a triptych of mirrors, each catching her from a different angle."
120b: k=1
See: A dancer strikes a pose in the leftmost mirror of a triptych. The other two mirrors are dark, their silvered surfaces waiting to catch the light. Grey curtain-rods hang between the three frames.
Do: The second mirror doesn't face the dancer head-on — it watches from her side, catching the scene as if she'd spun a quarter-turn on her heel. What was at her feet now stretches across the top, read from left to right like a sentence. The third mirror hangs behind her: it sees everything the first mirror saw, but perfectly inverted — the dancer's reflection flipped upside-down and backwards, as though she gazed at herself from the opposite corner of the room.
Grid: The triptych hangs three square mirrors side by side, each three panes tall and three panes wide, separated by narrow grey curtain-rods that never move. Only the leftmost mirror holds the dancer's living colors; the other two must learn her shape by turning the light.
We need to infer rule. Input grid seems 3x? Actually examples: Input appears 3 rows, each row length? Example1 input: "M G G X . . . X . . ." that's 11 columns? Let's count: M G G X . . . X . . . = 11. So three mirrors side by side each 3x3 with grey curtain rods (X) separating. So pattern: 3 columns mirror1, then X column, then 3 columns mirror2, then X column, then 3 columns mirror3. So total 3*3 +2 =11 columns. Yes. Thus each mirror is 3x3 region. Mirror1 contains original pattern (colors). Mirror2 and mirror3 initially empty (dots). Output shows transformed patterns placed into mirror2 and mirror3 according to description. In example output: same dimensions 3 rows 11 columns. Mirror1 unchanged? Let's compare first row input mirror1: M G G ; output same M G G. Yes unchanged. Mirror2 (columns 5-7) output: first row "M M M". According to description: second mirror shows original rotated quarter-turn (90 degrees) clockwise? Let's test: Original mirror1 matrix: Row1: M G G Row2: M G G Row3: M G R Rotate 90 clockwise: becomes Row1: M M M (from column1 bottom to top? Actually original column1: M,M,M becomes top row after rotation? Let's compute: original matrix A (r,c). Rotated 90 cw B(r,c)=A(3-c+1, r). So B row1 col1 = A(3,1)=M, row1 col2 = A(2,1)=M, row1 col3 = A(1,1)=M => M M M matches. Row2: B row2 col1 = A(3,2)=G, col2 = A(2,2)=G, col3 = A(1,2)=G => G G G matches output row2 mirror2: G G G. Row3: B row3 col1 = A(3,3)=R, col2 = A(2,3)=G, col3 = A(1,3)=G => R G G matches output row3 mirror2: R G G. Yes! So second mirror is 90-degree clockwise rotation of first mirror. Third mirror: description says inverted (upside-down and backwards) i.e., rotated 180 degrees? Actually "flipped upside-down and backwards" suggests 180-degree rotation (or both vertical and horizontal flip). Let's see output mirror3 columns 9-11: first row: R G M. Original rotated 180 would be: original reversed both rows and columns: original matrix reversed rows and columns gives: Original: M G G M G G M G R Rotate 180: row1 becomes original row3 reversed: R G M. Yes matches output row1 mirror3: R G M. Row2: original row2 reversed: G G M matches output row2 mirror3: G G M. Row3: original row1 reversed: G G M? Wait original row1 reversed: G G M. Output row3 mirror3: G G M. Yes matches. So third mirror is 180-degree rotation. Thus rule: Input contains leftmost 3x3 pattern, other two are empty (dots). Output: copy original unchanged in leftmost; fill middle mirror with 90-degree clockwise rotation; fill rightmost mirror with 180-degree rotation. Now test input: Rows: 1: G G W X . . . X . . . 2: W W W X . . . X . . . 3: R W W X . . . X . . . So leftmost 3x3 matrix: Row1: G G W Row2: W W W Row3: R W W We need to produce output with same dimensions 3x11. Mirror1 unchanged. Mirror2 (columns 5-7) = 90 cw rotation. Compute rotation: Original matrix A: [ [G, G, W], [W, W, W], [R, W, W] ] Rotate 90 cw: B rows: Row1 = column1 bottom to top: A[3,1]=R, A[2,1]=W ... [869 chars truncated]
"A cell divides along its spindle, each daughter inheriting the mother's blueprint but oriented to face a new horizon, then a granddaughter turns to face directly back at the origin."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A living specimen pressed between glass slides, flanked by two empty culture wells separated by grey membranes.
Do: The organism replicates into the first well, twisting on its axis as daughter cells align perpendicular to the mother. In the second well, the granddaughter generation has fully inverted, a perfect mirror of ancestry.
Grid: Three 3×3 chambers divided by single-column grey barriers. The leftmost chamber holds the original specimen; the middle and right chambers receive transformed copies.
"A constellation is catalogued from three observatories on a spinning planet: the prime observatory records it at midnight, the eastern station sees it after the sky has wheeled a quarter-turn, and the antipodal station sees it fully inverted against the opposite horizon."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three square star-chart panels separated by grey meridian lines. The first chart maps a constellation; the other two are blank sky.
Do: Project the constellation onto each successive chart as the planet's rotation shifts the observer's frame—first a quarter-turn of the celestial sphere, then a half-turn.
Grid: Three 3×3 star charts in a 3×11 strip, separated by grey meridian columns.
"A signal-flag hoist is read by three ships in a convoy: the flagship sees it straight on, the escort on the beam reads the flags from a perpendicular bearing, and the ship astern sees everything in reverse."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three square signal boards separated by grey mast columns. The first board displays a pattern of colored signal flags; the others are bare.
Do: Transcribe what each ship's lookout would record in their logbook based on their bearing relative to the flagship—the beam ship sees the hoist turned sideways, the stern ship sees it completely reversed.
Grid: Three 3×3 signal panels in a 3×11 display, divided by single grey mast columns.
"A pixel pattern is loaded into the first register of a shift-display, then clocked through two successive transformation stages—the first stage applies a quarter-cycle phase shift, the second applies a half-cycle inversion."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A three-segment LED matrix separated by grey bus lines. The first segment displays a colored pixel pattern; the other two segments are off.
Do: Clock the pattern through each stage, applying the cumulative phase transformation so that stage two shows a quarter-cycle shift and stage three shows a half-cycle shift.
Grid: Three 3×3 LED segments in a 3×11 display strip, separated by single grey bus-line columns.
"A sacred glyph is inscribed on the first face of a trinity stone. The second face receives the glyph as the sun god would see it from his chariot crossing east to west. The third face receives the glyph as the underworld lord reads it from below, where all things are upended."
120b: k=2
See: A trinity stone with three square faces separated by grey mortar lines. The first face bears a colored glyph; the other two are blank.
Do: Carve the glyph onto each face as it would appear to its divine reader—the sun god's perspective rotates the glyph as he passes, the underworld lord's perspective reverses it entirely.
Grid: Three 3×3 stone faces in a 3×11 tablet, divided by single grey mortar columns.
We need to infer rule. Input is 3x11 grid: three 3x3 faces separated by column of X (grey) as mortar. So layout: columns 0-2 face1, column3 X, columns4-6 face2, column7 X, columns8-10 face3 (blank). In examples, face1 contains colored glyph (non-blank). Face2 and face3 initially blank (dots). Output shows all three faces filled with glyphs transformed according to perspectives: sun god rotates glyph as he passes, underworld lord reverses it entirely. Need to decode. Let's examine Example1. Input face1 (3x3): Row0: M G G Row1: M G G Row2: M G R So glyph pattern. Output face1 (same location) appears unchanged? Let's see output columns 0-2: rows: Row0: M G G Row1: M G G Row2: M G R Yes unchanged. Face2 output columns 4-6: rows: Row0: M M M Row1: G G G Row2: R G G Face3 output columns 8-10: rows: Row0: R G M Row1: G G M Row2: G G M Now need to see transformation: maybe rotate 90 degrees for sun god (face2) and reverse (mirror) for underworld (face3). Let's test. Take original 3x3 matrix A: [ [M,G,G], [M,G,G], [M,G,R] ] Rotate 90 degrees clockwise yields: Row0: M,M,M (col0 bottom to top?) Actually rotation: new[i][j]=A[2-j][i]. Compute: i=0 row0: A[2][0]=M, A[1][0]=M, A[0][0]=M => M M M matches face2 row0. i=1 row1: A[2][1]=G, A[1][1]=G, A[0][1]=G => G G G matches. i=2 row2: A[2][2]=R, A[1][2]=G, A[0][2]=G => R G G matches. Yes face2 is 90° clockwise rotation. Now face3 maybe 180° rotation? Let's compute 180° rotation of original: reverse rows and columns. That would be: Row0: R G M (original row2 reversed) Row1: G G M (row1 reversed) Row2: G G M (row0 reversed) Matches face3 output exactly. So underworld lord reverses it entirely = 180° rotation (or flip both axes). Good. Now Example2 to confirm. Input face1: Row0: B B R Row1: Y B B Row2: Y Y B Output face1 unchanged. Face2 output: Rows: Row0: Y Y B Row1: Y B B Row2: B B R Check rotation 90° clockwise of original: Original matrix A: [ [B,B,R], [Y,B,B], [Y,Y,B] ] Rotate 90 cw: compute: Row0: A[2][0]=Y, A[1][0]=Y, A[0][0]=B => Y Y B matches. Row1: A[2][1]=Y, A[1][1]=B, A[0][1]=B => Y B B matches. Row2: A[2][2]=B, A[1][2]=B, A[0][2]=R => B B R matches. Yes. Face3 output: Rows: Row0: B B R Row1: B B Y Row2: R B B Check 180° rotation of original: Original reversed rows and columns: Row0: B Y Y? Wait compute: original row2 reversed: B Y Y? Actually row2 = Y Y B, reversed = B Y Y. But output row0 is B B R, not match. Let's compute 180 rotation: new[i][j] = A[2-i][2-j]. Compute: i=0,j=0 => A[2][2]=B i=0,j=1 => A[2][1]=Y i=0,j=2 => A[2][0]=Y => row0: B Y Y (but output row0 B B R). So not 180 rotation? Let's examine output face3: Rows: Row0: B B R Row1: B B Y Row2: R B B What transformation yields that? Maybe reflect across vertical axis (mirror) then rotate? Let's compute 90° counterclockwise? Original 90 ccw would be: Row0: R B B Row1: B B Y Row2: B Y Y. Not match. Maybe it's 90° clockwise then 180? Actually ... [3884 chars truncated]
"A troupe freezes in formation for three photographs: the first taken from the front, the second from the wings as the ensemble has pivoted a quarter-turn in unison, and the third from backstage where every dancer now faces away."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three square stage marks separated by grey wing curtains. The first set of marks shows the dancers' positions and colors; the others are unmarked.
Do: Record the formation as each photograph would capture it—the wing shot shows the group turned, the backstage shot shows the formation completely reversed.
Grid: Three 3×3 formation grids in a 3×11 stage plan, divided by grey curtain columns.
"A crystal's face pattern is observed in three cross-sections as the specimen is rotated in a goniometer: the first section is the natural face, the second is cut after a quarter-turn of the crystal axis, and the third after a half-turn, revealing the pattern's full rotational symmetry."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three square cross-section windows separated by grey mounting brackets in a specimen tray. The first window shows a colored mineral pattern; the other two are uncut.
Do: Slice the crystal at each successive rotation of the goniometer and record the pattern visible in each cross-section—the quarter-turn section and the half-turn section.
Grid: Three 3×3 cross-section windows in a 3×11 specimen tray, separated by single grey bracket columns.
"A chef plates the same composed dish three times: once as written, once turned for the guest on the side, and once flipped for the guest seated across the table."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A rectangular tray with three square plating zones separated by steel dividers. Only the first zone has food arranged on it; the others are clean.
Do: Recreate the arrangement so each guest sees a version rotated to face them—the side guest gets a quarter-turn, the opposite guest gets a half-turn.
Grid: Three 3×3 squares on a 3×11 tray, separated by grey divider columns at positions 3 and 7.
"A composer writes a motif, then subjects it to successive inversions—first the voices swap registers like a clock hand sweeping, then the whole phrase plays in retrograde from the final note back to the first."
120b: fail
See: A score with three staves separated by barlines. The first staff carries a melodic figure; the other two are rests.
Do: Transcribe the motif onto the second staff so that low voices rise and the phrase reads as though the page were turned sideways. On the third staff, write the motif backwards and upside-down.
Grid: Three 3×3 panels in a 3×11 grid, separated by grey columns acting as barlines.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid is 3 rows, 11 columns? Actually 3x11 grid with three 3x3 panels separated by grey columns (X). So pattern: first 3 columns panel, column 4 is X (separator), columns 5-7 second panel, column 8 X, columns 9-11 third panel. In examples, input has first panel filled with colors, second and third panels are empty (dots '.' representing black). Output shows transformation: first panel unchanged? Let's examine Example1. Input panel1 (cols1-3): Row1: M G G Row2: M G G Row3: M G R Separator col4: X Panel2 (cols5-7): all '.' (black) Panel3 (cols9-11): all '.'. Output: Row1: M G G X M M M X R G M Let's split: cols1-3 same as input? Row1 output cols1-3: M G G matches input. Good. col4 X unchanged. Panel2 cols5-7: M M M (transformed). col8 X unchanged. Panel3 cols9-11: R G M. So rule: take motif (first panel) and transcribe onto second panel with some transformation: "low voices rise and the phrase reads as though the page were turned sideways." That suggests rotate 90 degrees? Let's see mapping. First panel matrix: M G G M G G M G R Second panel output: M M M G G G R G M Let's write first panel as matrix A (rows top to bottom). Second panel B appears to be maybe transpose? Let's compute transpose of A: columns become rows. A: [ [M,G,G], [M,G,G], [M,G,R] ] Transpose (rows become columns): Row1: M M M (col1) Row2: G G G (col2) Row3: G G R (col3) but output row3 is R G M. Not match. Maybe rotate 90° clockwise? Rotate A 90 cw yields: Row1: M M M? Let's compute: rotate cw: new row i = column from bottom to top. Original matrix: col1: M,M,M col2: G,G,G col3: G,G,R Rotate cw => rows: Row1 = M G G? Wait compute: cw rotation: new matrix B[i][j] = A[ n-1-j ][ i ] for n=3. Let's compute: B[0][0] = A[2][0] = M B[0][1] = A[1][0] = M B[0][2] = A[0][0] = M => Row0: M M M matches output row1 (M M M). Good. B[1][0] = A[2][1] = G B[1][1] = A[1][1] = G B[1][2] = A[0][1] = G => Row1: G G G matches output row2 (G G G). Good. B[2][0] = A[2][2] = R B[2][1] = A[1][2] = G B[2][2] = A[0][2] = G => Row2: R G G but output row3 is R G M. Not match; last element differs (M vs G). Let's double-check A[0][2] is G (yes). Output row3 col3 is M. So not simple rotation. Maybe also reflect? "low voices rise" maybe means invert vertical order? Let's examine third panel output: R G M (row1), G G M (row2), G G M? Wait actual third panel output rows: Row1 cols9-11: R G M Row2: G G M Row3: G G M From output: Row1: ... X R G M Row2: ... X G G M Row3: ... X G G M So third panel is motif backwards and upside-down. That suggests rotate 180 and reverse? Let's compute transformation for third panel: maybe take first panel, reverse both rows and columns (rotate 180) then maybe also something else. First panel A: M G G M G G M G R Rotate 180 (flip both axes) yields: R G M G G M G G M That matches third panel exactly! Yes third panel output matches 180-degree rotation of first panel. Good. Now second panel: "write the motif onto ... [7873 chars truncated]
"A formation drawn on the coach's whiteboard is shown to scouts from three camera angles: the press box, the sideline tower, and the blimp directly overhead after a half-time rotation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tactical board divided into three zones by grey lane markers. The first zone shows the starting formation; the others are blank.
Do: Project the formation into each subsequent zone as it would appear from each successive vantage point—one tilted, one fully reversed.
Grid: A 3×11 board with three 3×3 zones at columns 0–2, 4–6, and 8–10, divided by grey at columns 3 and 7.
"A storm system spirals across three radar panels: the first shows the current front, the second shows the system after the Coriolis effect has twisted it a quarter-turn, and the third shows the storm as it would appear from the antipodal station."
120b: k=2
See: Three radar windows separated by static interference bands. The leftmost window displays a weather pattern; the other two are dark.
Do: Let the atmospheric forces rotate the pattern into the second window, then carry it further into the third window where it has been completely turned around.
Grid: Three 3×3 radar panels in a 3×11 display strip, divided by single columns of grey static.
We need to infer rule. Input is 3x11 grid: three 3x3 panels separated by column of X (grey) static. So layout: columns 0-2 left panel, column3 X separator, columns4-6 middle panel (initially empty '.'?), column7 X separator, columns8-10 right panel empty.
In examples, left panel contains pattern, middle and right are empty (dots). Output shows pattern rotated and moved across panels.
Let's examine Example1.
Input left panel (3x3):
Row0: M G G
Row1: M G G
Row2: M G R
Middle panel initially all '.' (dots). Right panel also '.'.
Output grid 3x11: Let's extract panels.
Output row0: "M G G X M M M X R G M"
So columns:
0 M,1 G,2 G,3 X,4 M,5 M,6 M,7 X,8 R,9 G,10 M
Thus middle panel (cols4-6) row0: M M M
Right panel (8-10) row0: R G M
Row1 output: "M G G X G G G X G G M"
Middle row1: G G G
Right row1: G G M
Row2 output: "M G R X R G G X G G M"
Middle row2: R G G
Right row2: G G M
So pattern seems to have been rotated and moved. Let's see original left panel matrix:
L = [[M,G,G],
[M,G,G],
[M,G,R]]
Now middle panel after transformation is some rotation of L? Let's compare.
Middle panel M_mid = [[M,M,M],
[G,G,G],
[R,G,G]]
Right panel R_panel = [[R,G,M],
[G,G,M],
[G,G,M]]
Observe that middle panel appears to be L rotated 90 degrees clockwise? Let's compute L rotated 90 cw: rows become columns reversed: new[0][*] = L[2][0], L[1][0], L[0][0] => [M, M, M] matches middle row0? Actually middle row0 is M M M, yes matches. Next row: L[2][1], L[1][1], L[0][1] => [G, G, G] matches middle row1. Next row: L[2][2], L[1][2], L[0][2] => [R, G, G] matches middle row2. So middle panel = L rotated 90 cw.
Right panel appears to be L rotated 180? Let's compute L rotated 180: reverse both rows and columns: [[R,G,M],
[G,G,M],
[G,G,M]] matches right panel exactly. Yes.
Thus rule: take left panel pattern, copy it rotated 90 cw into middle panel, and rotated 180 into right panel. Also keep left panel unchanged? In output left panel remains same as input. Yes.
Now Example2 to verify.
Input left panel:
Row0: B B R
Row1: Y B B
Row2: Y Y B
Compute 90 cw rotation: new rows:
Row0: Y B B? Let's compute: column0 bottom to top: row2 col0 = Y, row1 col0 = Y, row0 col0 = B => [Y,Y,B] but output middle row0 is Y Y B? Wait output middle row0: "Y Y B" yes matches. Row1: column1 bottom to top: row2 col1=Y, row1 col1=B, row0 col1=B => [Y,B,B] output middle row1: Y B B matches. Row2: column2 bottom to top: row2 col2=B, row1 col2=B, row0 col2=R => [B,B,R] output middle row2: B B R matches. Good.
Right panel should be 180 rotation: reverse rows and columns: original L reversed rows: row2 row1 row0 each reversed: row2 reversed = B Y Y, row1 reversed = B B Y, row0 reversed = R B B. So right panel rows: [B Y Y], [B B Y], [R B B]. Output right panel rows: Row0: B Y Y matches, Row1: B B Y matches, Row2: R B B matches. Yes.
Thus rule confirmed.
Now test input.
Inpu
... [1422 chars truncated]
"A mosaic tile pattern is installed on three adjacent walls of a corner room—each wall inherits the same design but the craftsman must account for the turn of each wall, so the pattern pivots with the architecture."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three square wall panels separated by narrow grey pilasters. The first panel bears an ornamental tile pattern; the others await installation.
Do: Transfer the design onto each successive wall, adjusting its orientation as the walls turn the corner, so the second wall shows the design as if you've stepped to your right, and the third as if you've walked around to face it head-on from behind.
Grid: A 3×11 facade with three 3×3 panels separated by grey pilaster columns.
"A general's battle map shows troop positions in three successive dispatches: the original field report, then intelligence redrawn from the enemy's flank, and finally the view from the enemy's own command tent looking back at their own lines."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A triptych war table with three square sectors separated by grey no-man's-land strips. The first sector shows unit positions; the others are fog of war.
Do: Reconstruct the battlefield from each new vantage: the flank observer sees the formation turned on its edge, and the enemy commander sees everything reversed.
Grid: Three 3×3 map sectors in a 3×11 table, separated by single grey columns.
"A stage tableau is performed three times in a revolving theater: first for the front audience, then the stage rotates a quarter-turn for the side balcony, then a half-turn for the rear gallery."
120b: k=1
See: A revolving stage platform with three marked performance squares separated by grey curtain tracks. The first square holds the actors in position; the others are dark.
Do: As the stage turns, the actors maintain their relative positions but the audience sees the tableau from successive angles—the side view and then the rear view.
Grid: Three 3×3 stage areas in a 3×11 platform, divided by grey curtain columns.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is 3 rows, 11 columns? Actually description: three 3x3 stage areas in a 3x11 platform, divided by grey curtain columns (X). So layout: columns: first 3 columns = first square, column 4 is X separator, columns 5-7 second square, column8 X separator, columns9-11 third square. Input shows first square filled with colors, second and third squares empty (dots). Output shows transformation: actors maintain relative positions but view rotates: side view then rear view. So likely we take the first 3x3 block (leftmost) and generate two more 3x3 blocks: one is a rotation (maybe 90°) and another is 180°? Let's examine example.
Input left block (3x3):
Row1: M G G
Row2: M G G
Row3: M G R
Output middle block (columns5-7) appears to be something: Let's extract from output.
Output row1 columns5-7: M M M
Row2: G G G
Row3: R G G
So middle block is maybe a rotation of left block? Let's compute left block matrix:
L = [[M,G,G],
[M,G,G],
[M,G,R]]
If we rotate 90° clockwise, we get:
[[M,M,M],
[G,G,G],
[G,G,R]]? Let's compute: clockwise rotation: new[i][j] = L[2-j][i]. So:
new row0: L[2][0]=M, L[1][0]=M, L[0][0]=M => M M M correct.
new row1: L[2][1]=G, L[1][1]=G, L[0][1]=G => G G G correct.
new row2: L[2][2]=R, L[1][2]=G, L[0][2]=G => R G G matches output row3: R G G. Yes! So middle block is 90° clockwise rotation of left block.
Now rightmost block (columns9-11) output rows:
Row1: R G M
Row2: G G M
Row3: G G M
Let's see if that's 180° rotation? 180° rotation of left block would be reversed both rows and columns: original L reversed rows and columns gives:
Row0 (top) becomes original bottom reversed: [R,G,M]
Row1: original middle reversed: [G,G,M]
Row2: original top reversed: [G,G,M] matches output! Yes right block is 180° rotation.
Thus rule: given left 3x3 block, fill middle block with 90° clockwise rotation, right block with 180° rotation. The X columns remain as separators. Dots become whatever? In output, the empty squares become filled with rotated patterns; original left block stays same.
Now test input:
Input grid:
Row1: G G W X . . . X . . .
Row2: W W W X . . . X . . .
Row3: R W W X . . . X . . .
Left block (3x3):
[[G,G,W],
[W,W,W],
[R,W,W]]
We need to compute 90° clockwise rotation for middle block, and 180° for right block.
Compute.
First, define L matrix.
L00=G, L01=G, L02=W
L10=W, L11=W, L12=W
L20=R, L21=W, L22=W
90° clockwise: new[i][j] = L[2-j][i]
Compute rows:
i=0 (row0):
j=0: L[2-0][0]=L[2][0]=R
j=1: L[2-1][0]=L[1][0]=W
j=2: L[2-2][0]=L[0][0]=G
=> row0: R W G
i=1 (row1):
j=0: L[2][1]=L[2][1]=W
j=1: L[1][1]=W
j=2: L[0][1]=G
=> row1: W W G
i=2 (row2):
j=0: L[2][2]=W
j=1: L[1][2]=W
j=2: L[0][2]=W
=> row2: W W W
So middle block should be:
Row1: R W G
Row2: W W G
Row3: W W W
Now 180° rotation: reverse both rows and columns. Equivalent to rotate 180: new[i][j] = L[2-i][2-j].
Compute:
Row0 (i=0):
... [967 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants a knot-garden pattern in one bed, then must replicate it in two neighboring beds as seen by visitors approaching from the garden path to the east, and from the terrace above looking south."
120b: k=1
See: Three square planting beds separated by gravel paths. The first bed is planted in a colored pattern; the other two are bare soil.
Do: Plant each successive bed so that a visitor arriving from a new direction sees the design properly oriented to their approach—the second bed for someone coming from the right side, the third for someone arriving from the far end.
Grid: Three 3×3 beds in a 3×11 garden row, separated by grey gravel-path columns.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is 3 rows, 11 columns? Actually three 3x3 beds separated by columns of X (grey). Input example: "M G G X . . . X . . ." etc. Let's parse. Example 1 Input grid (3 rows): Row1: M G G X . . . X . . . Row2: M G G X . . . X . . . Row3: M G R X . . . X . . . So there are three 3x3 blocks: columns 1-3 (first bed), column 4 is X separator, columns 5-7 second bed (currently all '.' black), column 8 is X separator, columns 9-11 third bed (all '.' black). Output grid: Row1: M G G X M M M X R G M Row2: M G G X G G G X G G M Row3: R G G X R G G X G G M Let's see transformation: The first bed (cols1-3) unchanged. The second bed (cols5-7) now filled with pattern derived from first bed but rotated? Let's examine. First bed pattern: Rows1-3, cols1-3: M G G M G G R G R? Wait row3 col3 is R? Actually row3 col3 is R (since row3: M G R). So pattern: [ [M,G,G], [M,G,G], [R,G,R] ]? No row3 col2 is G, col3 is R. So row3: M G R. So pattern is: M G G M G G M G R? Wait row3 col1 is M, col2 G, col3 R. So first column all M, second column all G, third column G,G,R. Now second bed output (cols5-7): Row1: M M M Row2: G G G Row3: R G G That looks like first bed rotated 90 degrees? Let's compare: first bed columns become rows? First bed column1 (M,M,M) becomes row1 of second bed? Actually second bed row1 is M M M which matches first column (M,M,M). Second bed row2 is G G G matches second column (G,G,G). Third bed row3 is R G G matches third column (G,G,R) but order? First column of first bed: M M M -> row1 of second bed. Second column: G G G -> row2. Third column: G G R -> row3? But row3 is R G G (different order). Maybe it's transposed and then reversed? Let's compute transpose of first bed: rows become columns. Transpose would be: Row1 of transpose = M M M (col1) Row2 = G G G (col2) Row3 = G G R (col3) That matches second bed rows except third row order: we have G G R vs R G G. So maybe they also rotate 180? Actually if we rotate 90 clockwise, first bed becomes: Row1 = M G M? Not. Let's examine third bed output (cols9-11): Row1: R G M Row2: G G M Row3: G G M What is relation? Maybe third bed is first bed rotated 180? Let's compute 180 rotation of first bed: reverse rows and columns: Original: M G G M G G M G R? Wait row3 is M G R. So 180 rotation yields: R G M G G M G G M That matches third bed! Indeed third bed rows: Row1: R G M (matches) Row2: G G M (matches) Row3: G G M (matches) Great! So third bed is 180-degree rotation of first bed. Second bed appears to be 90-degree rotation? Let's compute 90-degree clockwise rotation of first bed: Take original matrix, rotate cw: new row i = column (n- i +1) of original. For 3x3, cw rotation yields: Row1 = M M M? Actually column3 reversed: column3 original = G,G,R (top to bottom). Reverse gives R,G,G. So row1 cw = R G G. Not match. 90-degree counterclockwise rotation: column1 reversed becomes row? Column1 original = M,M,M reversed = M,M,M -> row1 ccw = M M M (matches second ... [5093 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black (.) background containing several distinct rectangular regions composed entirely of blue (B) and red (R) cells. Each region is a solid rectangle of B cells with some R cells scattered within it. The regions vary in size — some are small and some are large. They are separated from each other and from the grid edges by black cells.
Do: 1. Identify all distinct rectangular regions of non-black cells in the input grid. Each region is a contiguous rectangle of blue and red cells surrounded by black cells. 2. For each region, count the number of red (R) cells it contains. 3. Select the region that contains the greatest number of red cells. 4. Extract that region and output it as the result, trimmed to its exact bounding rectangle with no surrounding black cells.
Grid: The input is a 20×20 grid with a black (.) background. The output grid dimensions match exactly the height and width of the selected region. The output contains only blue (B) and red (R) cells — no black cells.
"The kingdom with the most rebellions draws the chronicler's attention."
120b: k=2
See: Across a dark sea, several blue kingdoms float as islands of varying sizes. Within each kingdom, red rebels hide among the loyal blue citizens — some kingdoms harbor just a handful of dissidents, while others are riddled with unrest.
Do: A royal chronicler surveys the archipelago from above, counting the rebels in each kingdom. The kingdom seething with the most red insurgents is the one worth documenting — it is lifted from the sea and preserved in the chronicle, its borders trimmed tight around its walls.
Grid: The dark sea fills a 20×20 world. The chronicled kingdom appears alone in the output, fitting exactly within its own fortress walls — only loyal blue citizens and red rebels remain, with no trace of the surrounding waters.
We need to infer rule: From description: dark sea = '.' background. Blue kingdoms = contiguous region of B? Within each kingdom, red R cells are inside. Need to find kingdom with most red cells, then output that kingdom trimmed to its bounding box, preserving B and R only (no '.'), maybe also keep shape exactly as in input (including interior '.'? but there are none inside kingdom? In examples, output contains only B and R, no '.'. Let's analyze Example1. Input 20x20. Need to locate blue regions (connected orthogonally? likely 4-direction). There are many B clusters. The output is 9x9 grid. Let's find which region corresponds. We can try to locate region with most R cells. Count R per B region. But maybe simpler: The output appears to be a region extracted from input rows 2-10? Let's see output first row: B B B B R B B B B. In input, look at rows 2-? Actually row indices starting 0? Let's examine input snippet near top: rows 2-? Row2 (0-index) is ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . .". That's row index 2. The segment columns? Let's write columns: positions 0-? The pattern: . . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . . . So there is a B region from col2 to col10 inclusive (9 cells) with an R at col6? Actually col2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B. That's exactly B B B B R B B B B. That matches first row of output. Good. Next output row: B R B B B B B B R. Look at input row3: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". The first region columns 2-10: B R B B B B B B R. matches output second row. So output corresponds to the region from rows 2-10, columns 2-10 (a 9x9 block) which is a blue kingdom with many reds. Thus rule: Find the blue region (connected component of B) that contains the most R cells (i.e., count of R within that component). Then output the minimal bounding rectangle that contains that component, preserving B and R cells (and maybe '.' inside? but there were no '.' inside region). In example1, that region is 9x9. Check example2. Input: there are two separate blue clusters? Let's locate region with most reds. Output is 5x6? Actually output grid lines: 5 rows, each 6 columns. Let's see if matches a region. Find in input where there is a block of B with some Rs. Look at rows 13-17 (0-index). Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Actually row13 is all '.'? Wait example2 input lines: after many empty rows, there is a block starting at row13? Let's list rows with B: Row13 (index 13?) Actually lines after many empty rows: row13 (0-index) maybe line 13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". Not. Let's examine given example2 input: after row 12 (0-index) there are many '.' rows. Then row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". Actually they show rows 13-? Let's parse: Rows (starting 0): 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . B B B B B B B B . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . B B B B R B B B . . 3: . . B B B B B . . . B B B B B B B B . . 4: . . B B B R B . . . B R B B B B R B . . 5: . . B B R B ... [8350 chars truncated]
"Under the microscope, several tissue samples sit on dark slides. Each sample is a colony of healthy blue cells peppered with infected red mutations. The pathologist selects the sample showing the most aggressive outbreak for closer examination."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark field with distinct rectangular colonies of blue cells, each harboring scattered red mutations.
Do: Identify the colony with the highest count of red infected cells. Isolate and extract that colony for the report.
Grid: Blue cells form the tissue; red cells are mutations. The black background is the empty slide.
"Against the void of space, several nebulae glow in tranquil blue, but within each cloud, red dwarf stars are igniting. The telescope locks onto the nebula with the most stellar births."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Black void containing rectangular blue nebulae, each peppered with red stellar ignitions.
Do: Count the red stars forming in each nebula. Focus the lens on the most active one and capture it alone.
Grid: Blue is nebular gas, red is newborn stars, black is empty space.
"Across a dark sea, several ice floes drift independently — vast blue platforms with red buoys frozen into them marking old shipwrecks. The salvage captain steers toward the floe hiding the most sunken treasure."
120b: k=2
See: Dark ocean with rectangular blue ice floes, each containing scattered red buoy markers.
Do: Count the red buoys in each floe. Navigate to the one with the most and chart it exclusively.
Grid: Blue ice is the floe surface, red buoys mark wrecks, black is open water.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids larger, output smaller subgrid focusing on region with most red buoys within blue area? Metaphor: rectangular blue ice floes each containing scattered red buoys. Count red buoys in each floe. Navigate to the one with the most and chart it exclusively. So output is the blue region (floe) that has the most red cells, preserving its shape and red positions? In example1, input shows many blue B and red R scattered. Output is 9x9 grid? Let's examine: Output size 9 rows, each 9 columns. In input, there are multiple rectangular blue regions? Need to locate region with most reds. Let's analyze example1 quickly. Input size 20x20? Actually 20 rows, 20 columns. Output 9x9. So the selected floe is 9x9 region of blue with reds inside. Let's locate in input where there is a 9x9 block of mostly B with some R. Look at rows 3-11 maybe? Row indices starting 0? Let's map. I'll copy part of input rows with B and R (ignoring .). Row2 (0-index?) Actually first two rows all . . . So region starts row2 (index2). Row2: ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." That's columns 2-? Let's index columns 0-19. At col2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B, then col11 . etc. So there is a block of B's from col2 to col10 (9 columns) with one R at col6. Row3: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R" So there is B block col2-? up to col10 maybe? Actually after col10 there is . then later B B B B B B B R at end. So first block col2-10 includes B at col2, R at col3, B's etc, R at col10? Wait col10 is? Let's count: col2 B,3 R,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 R? Actually there are 9 positions col2-10 inclusive = 9 cells. Row3 shows "B R B B B B B B B B R". That's 11? Let's count: after initial ". .", we have B (col2), space, R (col3), space, B (col4), space, B (col5), space, B (col6), space, B (col7), space, B (col8), space, B (col9), space, B (col10), space, B (col11), space, B (col12), space, B (col13), space, R (col14). Hmm maybe block larger. But output is 9x9, maybe the selected floe is the top-left blue region (starting at row2 col2) of size 9x9. Let's verify output pattern: Output rows: 1: B B B B R B B B B 2: B R B B B B B B R 3: B B B B B R B B B 4: B B B R B B B R B 5: R B B B B B B B B 6: B B B B B B B B B 7: B B B B B R B B B 8: B R B B B B B B B 9: B B B R B B B B R This matches pattern of reds within that 9x9 region. Let's compare with input rows 2-10 columns 2-10 maybe. Extract from input rows 2-10 (indices 2-10) columns 2-10: Row2 (index2): B B B B R B B B B (matches output row1) Row3: B R B B B B B B R (matches output row2) Row4: B B B B B R B B B (matches row3) Row5: B B B R B B B R B (row4) Row6: R B B B B B B B B (row5) Row7: B B B B B B B B B (row6) Row8: B B B B B R B B B (row7) Row9: B R B B B B B B B (row8) Row10: B B B R B B B B R (row9) Yes! So the selected region is rows 2-10, cols 2-10 (0-index). That's a 9x9 block of blue with reds. So rule: find the rectangular region of contiguous blue cells (maybe maximal ... [7455 chars truncated]
"On a dark circuit board, several blue chip arrays are mounted in separate zones. Within each array, a few transistors have burned red. The quality inspector pulls the chip with the most failures off the board."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark PCB with rectangular blue chip arrays containing scattered red-burned transistors.
Do: Count the red failures in each array. Remove the most defective chip and output it for analysis.
Grid: Blue transistors are functional, red are burned out, black is the bare board.
"In the underworld's darkness, several frozen lakes of blue souls shimmer. Scattered among each lake are red-burning condemned spirits. Hades descends to judge the lake seething with the most tormented souls."
120b: k=1
See: Dark underworld with rectangular blue soul-lakes, each containing scattered red burning spirits.
Do: Count the red condemned souls in each lake. Hades claims the lake with the most and raises it alone.
Grid: Blue souls fill each lake, red are the condemned, black is the void of the underworld.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many colors: . black background, B blue lakes, R red points inside. Output is a smaller grid (9x9) containing only B and R? Let's examine example1: Input size? Looks like 20x20? Output 9x9. The rule: Identify each rectangular blue region (lake) containing red scattered. Count reds per lake, find lake with most reds, output that lake alone (its shape) as a grid of B and R (preserve reds positions). So we need to locate each contiguous region of B (maybe rectangular) that contains R inside. Count reds inside each region. Choose region with max reds. Output that region cropped to its bounding rectangle, with B and R as in original, maybe also keep background as B? In output example, only B and R appear, no '.'. Let's verify with example: Need to find lakes in input. Look at input lines: many B clusters separated by '.' maybe. The output is 9x9. Let's try to see shape: Output first row: B B B B R B B B B (9 cells). So top row has a red at column5. So the selected lake likely has that pattern. We need to locate in input where such a 9x9 region exists with that pattern. Hard manually but we can trust rule. Thus for test input, we must find all rectangular blue regions (connected B?) containing reds. Determine which has most reds. Then output its bounding rectangle with B and R. We need to parse test input grid (20x20). Let's index rows 0-19, columns 0-19. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." All dots. Row1: ". B B B B B . . . B B B B B B B B . . ." Let's write columns 0-19: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16 B 17 . 18 . 19 . Row2: ". B B B B B . . . B B B B B R B B . . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 R 15 B 16 B 17 . 18 . 19 . Row3: ". B R B B B . . . B R B B B B B B . . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 R 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 B 10 R 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16 B 17 . 18 . 19 . Row4: ". B B B R B . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 R 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . Row5: ". B B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . Row6: ". B B B B B . . B B B B R B B R B B . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 R 13 B 14 B 15 R 16 B 17 B 18 . 19 . Row7: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B B B B B B . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16 B 17 B 18 . 19 . Row8: ". B B R B B . . B B R B B B B B B B . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 R 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 B 10 R 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16 B 17 B 18 . 19 . Row9: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B R B B R B . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 B 13 R 14 B 15 B 16 R 17 B 18 . 19 . Row10: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B B B B B B . ." Cols: 0 . 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 B 10 B 11 B 12 B 13 B 14 B 15 B 16 B 17 B 18 . 19 . Row1 ... [7522 chars truncated]
"In a dark ballroom, several rectangular formations of dancers in blue pirouette in unison, but a few in each formation break into wild red solos. The choreographer spotlights only the formation with the most improvisers."
120b: fail
See: Dark ballroom floor with rectangular blue dance formations, some dancers breaking into red solos.
Do: Count the red soloists in each formation. Spotlight the formation with the most and present it alone.
Grid: Blue dancers move in sync, red dancers improvise, black is the dark floor.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many colors but only B and R and . (black). Output is a smaller grid of B and R only (no .). It seems we need to find each "formation": rectangular blue blocks with some red inside. Count red soloists in each formation, pick formation with most reds, output that formation alone. In example, input shows many blue rectangles? Let's examine output: 9x9 grid? Actually output lines: 9 rows each with 9 entries. Yes 9x9. So the selected formation is 9x9 region containing blues and reds. Need to locate in input where there is a rectangular region of blues with reds inside. Likely there are multiple such rectangles; we choose the one with most reds. In example input, there are many B clusters. The bottom left area has many B rows with occasional R. The output appears to be a subgrid extracted from input. Let's try to locate output pattern in input. Output first row: B B B B R B B B B. Search in input rows for that pattern horizontally. Look at row 3 (0-index?) Input line 3 (starting from 0): ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." That's B B B B R B B B B after two leading '.'? Actually after two '.' there is B B B B R B B B B then . . . So matches first row of output (9 cells). So the rectangle likely starts at column 2 (0-index) row 2? Let's verify subsequent rows. Row 4 input: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". Starting at col2: B R B B B B B B B? Wait need 9 cells. Let's extract columns 2-10: indices 2-10 inclusive (9 cells). Row4 columns: at col2 B, col3 R, col4 B, col5 B, col6 B, col7 B, col8 B, col9 B, col10 B? Actually there are 9 cells: B R B B B B B B B. Output second row is "B R B B B B B B R". Not same; last cell is R not B. Let's check maybe rectangle offset differently. Maybe rectangle starts at column 2 row 2 and width 9, height 9. Let's extract rows 2-10 (9 rows) columns 2-10. I'll write rows with indices: Row0: all . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." Row3: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R" Row4: ". . B B B B B R B B B . . . B B R B B B" Row5: ". . B B B R B B B R B . . . B B B B B B" Row6: ". . R B B B B B B B B . . . B B B R B B" Row7: ". . B B B B B B B B B . . . B B B B B B" Row8: ". . B B B B B R B B B . . . B R B B B B" Row9: ". . B R B B B B B B B . . . B B B B R B" Row10:". . B B B R B B B B R . . . B R B B B B" Row11:". . . . . . . . . . . . . . B B B B B B" ... Now extract columns 2-10 (9 columns) for rows 2-10 (9 rows). Let's compute each row slice: Row2 cols2-10: positions: col2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B => B B B B R B B B B matches output row1. Row3 cols2-10: col2 B,3 R,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B => B R B B B B B B B. Output row2 is B R B B B B B B R. So mismatch at last cell (col10). In input row3 col10 is B, but output expects R. Maybe rectangle width includes column 11? Let's check row3 col11 maybe R? Row3 after col10 there is space? Row3 string: ". . B R B B B B ... [9552 chars truncated]
"Across a dark basalt plain, several blue mineral deposits lie exposed in rectangular veins. Within each deposit, red crystal inclusions sparkle. The geologist excavates the vein richest in rare red crystals."
120b: k=3
See: Dark basalt plain with rectangular blue mineral veins containing scattered red crystal inclusions.
Do: Count the red crystals in each vein. Extract the deposit with the highest count.
Grid: Blue mineral is the host rock, red crystals are rare inclusions, black is barren basalt.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids have many '.' (black) background, blue B as host, red R as inclusions. Output seems to be a subgrid containing the "vein" (connected region of B) that has the most R count, and output includes that region trimmed to bounding box? Let's examine Example1. We need to parse. Input size 20x20? Output is 9x9. Let's see which region selected. In Example1 input, there are many B clusters. The output appears to be a 9x9 grid of B and R only (no .). So they extracted a rectangular region containing the vein with highest red count. Likely they find each connected component of B (blue) that contains at least one R? Actually B is host rock, R are inclusions within B. The "vein" is a rectangular shape? In description: "rectangular blue mineral veins containing scattered red crystal inclusions." So each vein is a rectangle of B (maybe with some R inside). The input shows many B rectangles separated by '.' (black). The output is the rectangle with most R. Thus rule: Identify all axis-aligned rectangular regions composed of B (and possibly R) that are surrounded by '.' (or edges). Count number of R inside each region. Choose region with highest R count. Output that region as a grid (preserving B and R, no '.'), trimmed to rectangle. Check Example1: Output 9x9. Let's see if there is a 9x9 rectangle of B in input with many R. Hard to manually verify but plausible. Example2: Input size 20x20 again. Output is 5x6? Actually output lines: 5 rows, each with 6 entries. So rectangle 5x6. That matches a region of B in input. Example3: Output 5 rows, each 16? Actually output lines: first row has 16 B's? Let's count: "B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B" that's 17? Let's count: maybe 17. Let's count: there are 17 B's. Next rows similar length. So rectangle maybe 5x17. Thus rule seems consistent. Now need to apply to test input. We must locate rectangular blue regions (connected B's) that are rectangular shape (i.e., contiguous block of B and R). The input includes many B clusters with '.' gaps. We need to find each rectangular region of B (including R). Count R inside each. Choose highest R count. Output that rectangle. Let's parse test input grid 20x20 (looks). Let's index rows 0-19, columns 0-19. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row1: ". B B B B B . . . B B B B B B B B . . ." Row2: ". B B B B B . . . B B B B B R B B . . ." Row3: ". B R B B B . . . B R B B B B B B . . ." Row4: ". B B B R B . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". B B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". B B B B B . . B B B B R B B R B B . ." Row7: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B B B B B B . ." Row8: ". B B R B B . . B B R B B B B B B B . ." Row9: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B R B B R B . ." Row10: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B B B B B B . ." Row11: ". B R B B B . . B R B R B B B B B B . ." Row12: ". B B B B B . . B B B B B B B R B B . ." Row13: ". B B B R B . . B B R B R B B B B B . ." Row14: ". B B B B B . . B ... [8175 chars truncated]
"Several trays of blueberry scones cool on a dark countertop, but a few scones in each batch have been swapped for raspberry ones by a mischievous baker. The food critic tastes only from the tray that's been most thoroughly sabotaged."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark surface holding rectangular arrangements of blue items with scattered red substitutions.
Do: Find the arrangement containing the greatest number of red substitutions and serve only that tray.
Grid: Blue represents blueberry scones, red represents raspberry imposters, black is the countertop.
"Several orchestral sections rehearse in separate soundproofed rooms of a dark concert hall. Most musicians play in the key of blue, but a few rebels in each section insist on playing in red. The conductor steps into whichever room has the most dissonant voices."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Isolated rectangular ensembles of blue notes with scattered red dissonances on a silent black stage.
Do: Count the red dissonances in each ensemble. Enter the room with the most and bring only that performance forward.
Grid: Blue notes are consonant players, red notes are dissonant rebels, black is silence.
"Several blue-uniformed teams train on separate fields in a darkened stadium complex. Each team has a few players wearing red penalty bibs. The scout only films the team that's accumulated the most penalties."
120b: k=1
See: Dark grounds with rectangular squads of blue players, some marked with red bibs.
Do: Count the red-bibbed players on each field. Extract the squad with the highest count.
Grid: Blue is the standard uniform, red is the penalty bib, black is the empty stadium.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many '.' black background. There are rectangular squads of blue (B) with some red (R) inside. Need to count red per squad, extract squad with highest count. Output appears to be a subgrid containing that squad (only B and R). Let's verify. In example1 input, there are multiple rectangular regions of B (blue) maybe separated by '.'? Let's examine roughly. The input shows many rows with B and R clusters. At bottom rows there are rows of B only etc. The output is 9x9 grid? Let's count rows: output lines: 9 rows each with 9 entries. Yes 9x9. So the selected squad is a 9x9 rectangle of B with some R. Need to find region with most R count. We need to locate in input where that 9x9 region is. Let's try to locate coordinates. Input rows 0-? 20 rows? Actually example input has 20 rows (0-19). The output appears to be extracted from somewhere maybe rows 2-10 and columns 2-10? Let's test: In input row2 (0-index) line: ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." That's row index 2. Columns: after two '.' then B B B B R B B B B (10 cells?) Let's map: columns 2-? The pattern B B B B R B B B B (9? actually count). Let's list: col2 B,3 B,4 B,5 B,6 R,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 B,11? there is a space then '.'? Wait row2: ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." So after the sequence there is a '.' at col? Let's count: indices:0 '.';1 '.';2 B;3 B;4 B;5 B;6 R;7 B;8 B;9 B;10 B;11 '.'; then rest '.'. So there is a 5 B then R then 4 B = total 9 cells from col2 to col10 inclusive (9 cells). That's a 9-length row of B/R. That matches output first row? Output first row: "B B B B R B B B B". Yes exactly matches row2 columns 2-10. Good. Second output row: "B R B B B B B B R". Let's see input row3: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". Starting at col2: B R B B B B B B R? Let's check: col2 B,3 R,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 R? Wait there are 9 cells from col2 to col10: col2 B,3 R,4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 B,10 ? The row shows "... B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". Actually after the first segment there is a '.' at col11 then more B's later. So col10 is B? Let's recount: row3 string: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". So after initial ". .", we have: col2 B, col3 R, col4 B, col5 B, col6 B, col7 B, col8 B, col9 B, col10 B?, then col11 R? Wait there is "B B B B B B R". That's 7 B then R. Let's parse: after B R, there are B B B B B B (six B) then R. So total: B,R, six B, R = 8 cells? Actually B,R + six B = 8, plus R =9. So sequence: B,R,B,B,B,B,B,B,R. That matches output row2. Good. Thus the selected squad is the rectangular region from rows 2-10 and columns 2-10 (9x9). So rule: find the largest rectangular region of contiguous B (blue) possibly with R inside, bounded by '.' (black) or edges. Among all such rectangular squads, choose the one with highest count of R. Output that subgrid. Thus we need to apply to test input. We must locate all rectangular squads of B (blue) possibly with R inside. They appear as contiguou ... [8476 chars truncated]
"Across a dark sky, several cloud banks drift independently. Each cloud mass is mostly calm blue vapor, but lightning strikes leave red scorch marks within them. The storm chaser pursues the cloud with the most electrical fury."
120b: fail
See: Dark sky with separate rectangular cloud formations of blue vapor containing scattered red lightning scars.
Do: Find the cloud bank bearing the most red scorch marks and isolate it for observation.
Grid: Blue is calm vapor, red is lightning damage, black is clear dark sky.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many '.' and B and R. Output is a smaller grid (9x9) containing only B and R. It seems we need to find the "cloud bank bearing the most red scorch marks" i.e., find the rectangular region (cloud) of blue (B) that contains the most red (R) cells, then output that region (maybe cropped to bounding rectangle of that cloud?). In example, output is 9x9. Let's analyze example input to see where that region is. We need to locate clusters of B (blue) maybe separated by '.' (black). The input has many B clusters. The output appears to be a 9x9 region of B and R only, no '.'. Let's try to locate in input where a 9x9 region of B and R appears. Look at rows 3-11 maybe? Let's index rows starting 0. Given input lines (I'll copy first few rows with indices): 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . . 3: . . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R 4: . . B B B B B R B B B . . . B B R B B B 5: . . B B B R B B B R B . . . B B B B B B 6: . . R B B B B B B B B . . . B B B R B B 7: . . B B B B B B B B B . . . B B B B B B 8: . . B B B B B R B B B . . . B R B B B B 9: . . B R B B B B B B B . . . B B B B R B 10: . . B B B R B B B B R . . . B R B B B B 11: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B B B B B B 12: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13: B B B B B B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . 14: B B B R B B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . 15: B R B B B B B R B . . B B B B B B . . . 16: B B B B R B B B B . . B B B R B B . . . 17: B B B B B B R B B . . B R B B B B . . . 18: B B R B B B B B B . . B B B B B B . . . 19: B B B B B B B B B . . . . . . . . . . . 20: (output lines?) Actually after input there is output grid 9x9. So the region likely is the top-left cluster of B's (rows 2-10, columns 2-? maybe 10?). Let's examine columns: In rows 2-10, there are B's from column 2 onward up to maybe column 10? Let's count: Row2: ". . B B B B R B B B B . . . . . . . . ." So B at col2-5, R at col6, B at col7-10. That's columns 2-10 inclusive (9 columns). Row3: ". . B R B B B B B B R . . . B B B B B R". So B at col2, R at col3, B at col4-9, R at col10, then later B at col13-? etc. So first cluster maybe columns 2-10 again. Row4: ". . B B B B B R B B B . . . B B R B B B". So B at col2-6, B at col7? Actually B at col2-6, B at col7? Wait there is B at col2-6, then B at col7? The pattern: B B B B B B B R B B B. So columns 2-8 B, col9 R, col10-12 B. So again cluster columns 2-12? But there is a gap after col12 maybe '.'. But output is 9x9, maybe the region is columns 2-10 (9 columns) rows 2-10 (9 rows). Let's extract that subgrid (rows 2-10, cols 2-10). Let's write them: Row2 (r2): cols2-10: B B B B R B B B B Row3: cols2-10: B R B B B B B B R Row4: cols2-10: B B B B B B B R B Row5: cols2-10: B B B R B B B R B Row6: cols2-10: R B B B B B B B B Row7: cols2-10: B B B B B B B B B Row8: cols2-10: B B B B B R B B B Row9: cols2-10: B R B B B B B B B Row10: cols2-10: ... [8398 chars truncated]
"In a sprawling dark city grid, several buildings stand as blue-tiled facades with occasional red warning tiles marking structural faults. The demolition crew is dispatched to the building showing the most distress."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark cityscape with rectangular blue-tiled structures, each containing scattered red fault markers.
Do: Survey all structures, count the red fault tiles in each, and pull out the most compromised building for the report.
Grid: Blue tiles are sound structure, red tiles are faults, black is empty city space.
"Several blue garrisons are stationed across a dark no-man's-land. Within each fortress, red spies have infiltrated the ranks. Intelligence command extracts the garrison that has been most deeply compromised."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark battlefield with rectangular blue garrisons, each harboring scattered red infiltrators.
Do: Count the red spies in each garrison. Extract the most compromised garrison entirely.
Grid: Blue soldiers fill each garrison, red marks the spies, black is the empty battlefield.
"On a darkened stage, several spotlight pools illuminate rectangular casts of actors in blue costumes. A few actors in each cast secretly wear red beneath their cloaks. The director calls forward the cast hiding the most red understudies."
120b: fail
See: Dark stage with separate rectangular ensembles of blue-costumed performers, some concealing red.
Do: Identify which ensemble contains the most red-costumed understudies and bring that cast to center stage alone.
Grid: Blue costumes are the leads, red costumes are hidden understudies, black is the unlit stage.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids have many rows, with black '.' background, blue B rectangles, red R inside. Output seems to be a cropped region containing the rectangle (ensemble) with most reds, and only that rectangle extracted, maybe with its reds preserved, and maybe trimmed to minimal bounding box? Let's examine Example1. We need to parse. Input1: large grid 19x20? Actually lines show 20 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 20 columns. Many rows. In input, there are multiple rectangular ensembles of blue with some reds inside. Output is 9x9 grid of B and R only (no dots). Output appears to be a rectangle extracted. Let's locate in input where that rectangle is. Need to find region with most reds. Let's approximate: The output pattern: Row1: B B B B R B B B B Row2: B R B B B B B B R Row3: B B B B B R B B B Row4: B B B R B B B R B Row5: R B B B B B B B B Row6: B B B B B B B B B Row7: B B B B B R B B B Row8: B R B B B B B B B Row9: B B B R B B B B R So 9x9. Let's see if there is a 9x9 region in input with that pattern. Look at input rows 3-11 maybe? Let's extract rows 3-11 columns 3-11? Row indices starting 0? Hard. But likely the rule: Find the blue rectangle (contiguous region of B) that contains the most R cells. Then output that rectangle (its bounding box) with B and R as they are, but maybe replace any other colors? In examples, there are only B and R inside rectangle; background '.' outside. In Example2, output is 5x6? Actually output lines: B B B B B B B R B R B B B B R B R B B R B B B B B B B R B B That's 5 rows, 6 columns. So rectangle size 5x6. In input2, there are multiple blue rectangles. Need to find one with most reds. Let's examine input2: there is a region near rows 14-18 columns maybe 7-12? Let's parse quickly. Rows (0-index): 0: all dots 1: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B B B B B B . ." So row1 has a horizontal line of B from col10 to col17 (8 B). Row2 similar with one R at col? row2: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B B R B B B . ." So B's with an R at col? Let's count: columns 0-9 dots, col10 B, 11 B,12 B,13 B,14 R,15 B,16 B,17 B, 18 dot,19 dot. Row3: ". . B B B B B . . . B B B B B B B B . ." So there is a block of B from col2-6 (5 B) then later B's from col10-? etc. Rows 4-8 have more B and R. Later rows 13-17 have another block: rows 13-17 columns 6-11 maybe. Let's locate rectangle with many reds: In lower part rows 13-17 (0-index) there is a 5x6 block of B with some Rs inside. Output is 5x6, matches that region. Thus rule: Identify the rectangular region of B (blue) that contains the most R cells (red). Then output that region (its bounding box) as a grid of B and R (preserving colors). Possibly also include any other colors? Not needed. Now need to apply to test input. We must parse test input grid (20 rows? Let's count). Provided lines: Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row1: ". B B B B B . . . B B B B B B B B . . ." Row2: ". B B B B B . ... [8980 chars truncated]
"In a dark greenhouse, several raised beds are planted with blue flowers, but weeds with red blossoms have crept into each plot. The gardener uproots the entire bed that's been most overrun for closer study."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dark greenhouse floor with rectangular flower beds of blue blooms and scattered red weeds.
Do: Count the red weeds in each bed. Lift out the bed with the most red invaders.
Grid: Blue flowers fill each bed, red marks the weeds, black is bare greenhouse floor.
See: The input is a 9×9 grid with a black background. Somewhere within the grid, a small shape made of a single non-black color occupies a 3×3 region. This shape consists of some colored and some black cells within that 3×3 bounding box. The rest of the grid is entirely black.
Do: Divide the 9×9 grid into a 3×3 arrangement of 3×3 blocks (rows 0-2/3-5/6-8, cols 0-2/3-5/6-8). Extract the 3×3 shape from the block where it appears. Read the shape's binary pattern: each cell is either 'on' (colored) or 'off' (black). This binary pattern tells you which of the nine 3×3 blocks in the meta-grid should receive a copy of the shape. Specifically, if the shape's cell at relative position (r, c) is colored, then stamp a copy of the shape into the 3×3 block at meta-grid position (r, c). If the shape's cell is black, leave that block empty. The original block where the shape appeared is also governed by this rule — it keeps its copy only if the pattern dictates it.
Grid: The grid is always 9×9, naturally partitioned into a 3×3 meta-grid of 3×3 blocks. The background color is black (.). Only one non-black color is used. The output grid has the same 9×9 dimensions.
"A signet stamp presses its own seal wherever its ink touches."
120b: k=2
See: A 9×9 dark canvas is divided into a 3×3 mosaic of nine chambers. In one chamber, a small signet seal has been carved — a pattern of colored wax against dark stone, filling exactly one 3×3 chamber.
Do: The seal is both the message and the address book. Each dot of wax in the seal points to a chamber in the mosaic — the seal's own shape is a map of where it wants to be stamped. Wherever the wax touches within its tiny 3×3 frame, it dispatches a perfect replica of itself to the corresponding chamber of the larger mosaic. Where the seal is blank, that chamber stays dark and empty. The seal reproduces itself across the canvas according to its own image — it is a self-replicating blueprint.
Grid: The canvas is always 9×9, a mosaic of nine 3×3 chambers arranged 3×3. The night-dark background (.) is the unmarked stone. Only one color of wax is used. The final mosaic keeps the same 9×9 dimensions.
We need to infer rule. The description: 9x9 grid divided into 3x3 chambers each 3x3. There is a "seal" pattern of colored wax within one 3x3 chamber (i.e., a 3x3 subgrid containing the colored cells). That pattern is replicated to other chambers according to its own shape: each colored cell in the seal corresponds to a chamber location (i.e., which of the 9 chambers). For each colored cell in the seal, we place a copy of the entire seal pattern into the corresponding chamber in the larger grid. Where seal is blank, that chamber stays empty (i.e., all .). So we need to locate the 3x3 region that contains the colored cells (the "seal") in the input. Then replicate that pattern across the 9x9 grid: for each cell (i,j) within the 3x3 seal that is colored, we copy the entire 3x3 seal pattern into the chamber at position (i,j) in the 3x3 arrangement of chambers. Let's test with Example 1. Input example 1: we have O's in a small 3x3 region? Let's locate. Input grid shows O's at positions: row4 col6? Actually rows indexed 0-8. Input lines: Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: ". . . . . O . . ." => O at (3,5) Row4: ". . . . O O . . ." => O at (4,4) and (4,5) Row5: ". . . O . . . . ." => O at (5,3) others empty. These O's form a shape within a 3x3 block? Let's see bounding box: rows 3-5, cols 3-5. That's a 3x3 block. Within that block, the pattern is: Rows 3-5, cols 3-5: Row3 (r=3): cols3-5 => positions (3,3) ., (3,4) ., (3,5) O => . . O Row4: (4,3) ., (4,4) O, (4,5) O => . O O Row5: (5,3) O, (5,4) ., (5,5) . => O . . So seal pattern: . . O . O O O . . Now output example 1: we need to see if this pattern is replicated across chambers. Output grid given: Let's map chambers. The output appears to have O's placed in a diagonal pattern across the whole grid. Let's compute expected: For each colored cell in seal (positions within 3x3), we copy the whole seal into the corresponding chamber. First, label positions within seal (i,j) where i,j =0..2 (top-left of block). The colored cells are at (0,2), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). So four cells. Thus we will place copies of the seal into chambers at those positions in the 3x3 arrangement of chambers. Chambers are arranged 3x3; each chamber is 3x3 cells. Chamber (0,0) corresponds to rows0-2, cols0-2; (0,1) rows0-2, cols3-5; etc. So we need to place seal pattern into chambers (0,2), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). Let's see output: O's appear in those chambers accordingly. Check chamber (0,2): rows0-2, cols6-8. Output rows0-2, cols6-8 should contain the seal pattern. Output row0: "... ... O" at col8? Actually output row0: ". . . . . . . . O" => O at col8 (index8). Row1: ". . . . . . . O O" => O at col7,8. Row2: ". . . . . . O . ." => O at col6. This matches pattern . . O / . O O / O . . placed at (0,2) chamber (cols6-8). Indeed row0 col8 O (position (0,2) within chamber). Row1 col7 O (1,1) and col8 O (1,2). Row2 col6 O (2,0). Good. Chamber (1,1): rows3-5, cols3-5. Output rows3-5, cols3- ... [6160 chars truncated]
"A cell divides according to the instructions written in its own DNA — each gene that is 'expressed' spawns a daughter cell in the corresponding tissue region, while silent genes leave those regions empty."
120b: fail
See: A small organism floats in one chamber of a nine-chambered petri dish. Its body is a cluster of active and dormant genes.
Do: The organism reads its own genetic code: wherever a gene is active, it buds a perfect clone into the matching chamber of the dish. Dormant genes leave their chambers sterile.
Grid: 9×9 grid, black background, one non-black color. Output is the same 9×9 grid with copies placed according to the self-replicating rule.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid 9x9 with black background '.' and one non-black color (in examples O, in test R). The rule: "organism reads its own genetic code: wherever a gene is active, it buds a perfect clone into the matching chamber of the dish. Dormant genes leave their chambers sterile." So we have a cluster of active/dormant genes in one chamber (maybe a shape). The organism replicates itself into other chambers according to pattern? Let's examine example. Input example 1: we have O's in certain positions. Let's map coordinates. Use row index 0-8, col 0-8. Input O positions: Row3 col4? Wait row indexing: row0 top. Input lines: Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: ". . . . O . . . ." => O at (3,4) Row4: ". . . . O O . . ." => O at (4,4) and (4,5) Row5: ". . . O . . . . ." => O at (5,3) Rows6-8 all . So shape is like a small cluster: coordinates relative maybe? Let's list: (3,4), (4,4), (4,5), (5,3). That's like a shape of 4 cells. Output grid shows many O's placed in a pattern across the whole grid. Let's list output O positions: Row0: ". . . . . . . . O" => (0,8) Row1: ". . . . . . . O O" => (1,7),(1,8) Row2: ". . . . . . O . ." => (2,6) Row3: ". . . . . O . . O" => (3,5),(3,8) Row4: ". . . . O O . O O" => (4,4),(4,5),(4,7),(4,8) Row5: ". . . O . . O . ." => (5,3),(5,6) Row6: ". . O . . . . . ." => (6,2) Row7: ". O O . . . . . ." => (7,1),(7,2) Row8: "O . . . . . . . ." => (8,0) Observing pattern: It seems the original shape is being reflected/rotated across diagonal? Let's see mapping: original shape coordinates relative to some origin maybe (3,4) is top-left of shape? Let's compute shape's bounding box: rows 3-5, cols 3-5. Within that 3x3 box, pattern: Rows relative: r0 (row3): col4 => position (0,1) within box (since box cols 3-5). So pattern: [ . O . ] Row4: col4,5 => (1,1) and (1,2) => [ . O O ] Row5: col3 => (2,0) => [ O . . ] So shape matrix: row0: . O . row1: . O O row2: O . . Now output seems to have this shape repeated along anti-diagonal? Let's examine output positions relative to bottom-left to top-right diagonal. The output O's appear to form same shape but shifted each step? Let's map output shape positions relative to some diagonal line. If we take the output O's and reflect across main diagonal (top-left to bottom-right) maybe we get original shape? Let's compute transpose of original shape (swap rows/cols). Original shape matrix (3x3) transposed: row0: . . O row1: O O . row2: . O . That is: [ . . O O O . . O . ] Now look at output pattern near bottom-left? Output O's at (8,0) (7,1)(7,2)(6,2)(5,3)(5,6)(4,4)(4,5)(4,7)(4,8)(3,5)(3,8)(2,6)(1,7)(1,8)(0,8). This seems like shape repeated along a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right (anti-diagonal). The positions form a line of slope -1 (i+j constant). Indeed (8,0) sum=8, (7,1) sum=8, (7,2) sum=9, (6,2) sum=8, (5,3) sum=8, (5,6) sum=11, etc not consistent. Maybe rule: For each O in inpu ... [10069 chars truncated]
"A constellation maps its own stars onto the sky — each bright star in the constellation projects the whole pattern onto a new quadrant, while dark gaps project nothing."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-quadrant sky chart has one quadrant containing a small star pattern with bright and dim positions.
Do: The constellation uses its own brightness map as a projection guide. For each bright star, the full constellation appears in the matching quadrant. Dim positions leave quadrants empty.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, single color for stars. Output places constellation copies per its own brightness map.
"A lighthouse flashes its own signal pattern across the harbor — each flash illuminates a matching berth with an identical beacon, while dark intervals leave berths unlit."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-berth harbor grid has one berth containing a small signal pattern of lit and unlit cells.
Do: The signal reads its own flash pattern as a harbor chart. Each lit cell means the full signal is replicated in the corresponding berth. Unlit cells stay dark.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one color. Output distributes the signal across berths per its own flash pattern.
"A circuit board etches copies of its own chip layout wherever the chip's own transistors are active — powered transistors propagate the full circuit to their corresponding board sectors."
120b: fail
See: A nine-sector motherboard has one sector containing a small chip pattern with active and inactive nodes.
Do: The chip reads its own activation pattern as a placement guide. For each active node, the full chip layout is etched into the matching sector. Inactive nodes leave sectors blank.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one color for active traces. Output replicates the chip per its own activation map.
We need to infer rule. Input is 9x9 grid with some colored cells (O in example). Output is also 9x9 with pattern of O's placed in a diagonal mirrored way? Let's examine example. Input grid: only O's in a small cluster near center-left? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Rows 0-8. Input O positions: Row3 col4? Wait row3 line: ". . . . O . . . ." Actually row3: ". . . . O . . . ." (since line: ". . . . O . . . .") yes O at (3,4) Row4: ". . . . O O . . ." O at (4,4) and (4,5) Row5: ". . . O . . . . ." O at (5,3) So shape is like a small L? Let's list: (3,4), (4,4), (4,5), (5,3). That's like a 2x2 block offset. Now output grid shows many O's across whole grid, seems like the pattern is replicated across 9 sectors (3x3 blocks). The description: nine-sector motherboard (3x3 sectors). One sector contains a small chip pattern with active and inactive nodes. The chip reads its own activation pattern as a placement guide. For each active node, the full chip layout is etched into the matching sector. Inactive nodes leave sectors blank. Interpretation: The 9x9 grid is divided into 3x3 sectors each of size 3x3 cells. Within the central sector (maybe?) there is a chip pattern (the active nodes). The pattern indicates which sectors (among the 9) should receive a copy of the chip pattern. For each active node (colored cell) in the chip pattern, we copy the entire chip pattern into the sector corresponding to that node's position (relative within the 3x3). Inactive nodes (empty) leave sector blank. Thus we need to identify the chip pattern: the pattern of colored cells within a 3x3 sector? In example, the colored cells are O's located in positions that span across sector boundaries? Let's see: The O's are at rows 3-5, cols 3-5. That's a 3x3 block region (rows 3-5, cols 3-5) which is the central sector (since sectors are 3x3). Indeed sector indices: sector row = floor(row/3), sector col = floor(col/3). Rows 3-5 => sector row 1 (middle). Cols 3-5 => sector col 1 (middle). So the chip pattern is located in the central sector (sector (1,1)). Within that sector, the O's pattern is at positions relative to sector: (0,1) (since row3-col3 offset?), let's compute: row3 (global) - sector start row 3 = 0, col4 - start col 3 =1 => (0,1). Row4 col4 => (1,1). Row4 col5 => (1,2). Row5 col3 => (2,0). So pattern within 3x3 sector: O at (0,1), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's the chip. Now output: we see O's placed across many sectors. Let's see output grid rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . . O" Row1: ". . . . . . . O O" Row2: ". . . . . . O . ." Row3: ". . . . . O . . O" Row4: ". . . . O O . O O" Row5: ". . . O . . O . ." Row6: ". . O . . . . . ." Row7: ". O O . . . . . ." Row8: "O . . . . . . . ." We can see O's forming a diagonal pattern from bottom-left to top-right, replicating the chip pattern rotated? Let's map sectors. Divide output into 3x3 sectors. Sector (0,0) rows0-2 cols0-2: all '.' (blank). Sector (0,1) rows0-2 cols3-5: all '.'? Row0 col3-5 ' ... [10547 chars truncated]
"A rune inscribes itself across the stone tablet wherever its own marks glow — each glowing stroke summons the full rune into the corresponding sacred tile, while faded marks invoke nothing."
120b: fail
See: A nine-tile tablet has one tile bearing a small rune with glowing and faded marks.
Do: The rune reads its own glow pattern as a summoning chart. Each glowing mark calls forth the complete rune in the corresponding tile. Faded marks leave tiles bare.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one non-black color. Output places rune copies per the rune's own glow pattern.
We need to infer rule. Input is 9x9 with one non-black color (example1 O, example2 A). Output shows many copies of that color placed according to pattern of the "rune" (the shape of the non-black cells in input). The description: "Each glowing mark calls forth the complete rune in the corresponding tile. Faded marks leave tiles bare." So the input has a pattern of colored cells (the rune). The output replicates the entire pattern at positions where the input had colored cells (glowing marks). So we need to take the shape of the colored cells (the "rune") and for each colored cell in the input, place a copy of the whole shape (with same color) anchored perhaps at that cell? Let's test with example1. Example1 input: O's at positions: (row4,col5) (0-index? Let's index rows 0-8, columns 0-8). Input grid lines: Row0: all . Row1: . Row2: . Row3: ". . . . O . . . ." => O at (3,4) Row4: ". . . . O O . . ." => O at (4,4) and (4,5) Row5: ". . . O . . . . ." => O at (5,3) Rows6-8 all . So shape consists of three O's forming a small L? Actually coordinates: (3,4), (4,4), (4,5), (5,3). That's 4 cells. Now output: we need to see where O's appear. Output grid given: Row0: ". . . . . . . . O" => O at (0,8) Row1: ". . . . . . . O O" => O at (1,7),(1,8) Row2: ". . . . . . O . ." => O at (2,6) Row3: ". . . . . O . . O" => O at (3,5),(3,8) Row4: ". . . . O O . O O" => O at (4,4),(4,5),(4,7),(4,8) Row5: ". . . O . . O . ." => O at (5,3),(5,6) Row6: ". . O . . . . . ." => O at (6,2) Row7: ". O O . . . . . ." => O at (7,1),(7,2) Row8: "O . . . . . . . ." => O at (8,0) We can see that the pattern of O's seems to be the original shape rotated? Let's map original shape coordinates relative to some origin. Suppose we treat the shape as a 3x3? Actually original shape coordinates: (3,4) (4,4) (4,5) (5,3). Let's compute relative positions to top-left of shape bounding box. Bounding box rows 3-5, cols 3-5. Top-left (3,3). Relative positions: (0,1), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). That's shape. Now output seems to have O's at many positions that correspond to placing this shape at each original O location? Let's test: For each original O location, we place the shape anchored such that the original O's relative position maybe the "glowing mark" corresponds to the "origin" of the shape? Which cell of the shape is considered the anchor? Possibly the top-leftmost O? In original shape, which cell is considered the "rune"? The description: "one tile bearing a small rune with glowing and faded marks." So the input has a single tile (maybe a single cell) that contains the rune pattern (colored marks) within that tile? But the grid is 9x9, each tile maybe 3x3? Wait nine-tile tablet maybe 3x3 tiles each of size 3x3? The input shows colored cells forming a shape within a 3x3 region? Let's examine: The O's occupy rows 3-5 and cols 3-5, which is a 3x3 block. Indeed they are within a 3x3 region (rows 3-5, cols 3-5). So perhaps the tablet is 3x3 tiles, each til ... [9887 chars truncated]
"A choreographer's opening pose dictates which stages across the venue will host the full routine — each limb that is extended points to a stage that receives the dance, while tucked limbs leave stages still."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-stage venue has one stage showing a small pose with extended and retracted positions.
Do: The pose reads its own extensions as a venue map. For each extended position, the full pose is performed on the corresponding stage. Retracted positions leave stages empty.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, single color. Output distributes the pose across stages per its own extension pattern.
"A crystal seed grows copies of its own lattice structure into every vein where its own mineral deposits are present — active deposits propagate the full crystal, while barren veins stay hollow."
120b: fail
See: A nine-vein rock formation has one vein containing a small crystal pattern with mineral-rich and empty sites.
Do: The crystal reads its own mineral pattern as a growth map. Each mineral-rich site triggers the full lattice to crystallize in the matching vein. Empty sites remain barren.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one color for crystal. Output fills veins with crystal copies per the seed's own mineral distribution.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 9x9 black except some O's forming a shape in lower-left? Let's map coordinates. Input example1: O's at positions: Row4 col5? Let's index rows 1-9, cols 1-9. Given input lines: 1: all . 2: all . 3: all . 4: ". . . . O . . . ." => O at (4,5) 5: ". . . . O O . . ." => O at (5,5) and (5,6) 6: ". . . O . . . . ." => O at (6,4) others none. So shape is like a small L? Actually coordinates: (4,5), (5,5),(5,6),(6,4). That's like a 2x2 block missing one? Let's visualize: Row4 col5 Row5 col5 col6 Row6 col4 Now output grid shows many O's forming pattern across whole grid. Output lines: 1: ". . . . . . . . O" => O at (1,9) 2: ". . . . . . . O O" => O at (2,8),(2,9) 3: ". . . . . . O . ." => O at (3,7) 4: ". . . . . O . . O" => O at (4,6),(4,9) 5: ". . . . O O . O O" => O at (5,5),(5,6),(5,8),(5,9) 6: ". . . O . . O . ." => O at (6,4),(6,7) 7: ". . O . . . . . ." => O at (7,3) 8: ". O O . . . . . ." => O at (8,2),(8,3) 9: "O . . . . . . . ." => O at (9,1) Observing pattern: It seems the original O shape is being reflected/rotated across diagonal? Actually original O positions relative to some vein? The description mentions nine-vein rock formation, each vein maybe a diagonal? The output shows O's placed along a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right (anti-diagonal). Indeed O's appear on positions where row+col = 10? Let's check: (9,1) sum=10, (8,2)=10, (7,3)=10, (6,4)=10, (5,5)=10, (4,6)=10, (3,7)=10, (2,8)=10, (1,9)=10. Yes all O's on anti-diagonal. Additionally there are extra O's at (5,6) sum=11, (5,8) sum=13, (5,9) sum=14, (4,9) sum=13, (2,9) sum=11, (1,9) already counted, (2,8) sum=10 already, (3,7) sum=10, (4,6) sum=10, (6,7) sum=13, (8,3) sum=11, (8,2) sum=10, (2,9) sum=11, (5,8) sum=13, (5,9) sum=14, (4,9) sum=13. So extra O's correspond to original shape pattern being "projected" onto each vein? The description: nine-vein rock formation has one vein containing a small crystal pattern with mineral-rich and empty sites. The crystal reads its own mineral pattern as a growth map. Each mineral-rich site triggers the full lattice to crystallize in the matching vein. Empty sites remain barren. Interpretation: There are 9 veins (maybe rows, columns, diagonals?). The seed pattern is placed in one vein (maybe the central diagonal?). Then for each mineral-rich site (colored cell) in the seed, we fill the entire corresponding vein across the whole grid with that color. The veins are perhaps the 9 lines of a 9x9 grid: the 9 rows, 9 columns, and 2 diagonals? But nine veins suggests maybe the 9 lines of a 3x3? Actually 9 veins could be the 9 rows (or columns). But the output shows O's along anti-diagonal (one vein) and also other positions not forming full rows/columns. Let's examine: The original O pattern occupies positions (4,5),(5,5),(5,6),(6,4). These are on rows 4,5,6 and columns 4,5,6. The output includes O's on anti-diagonal (row+col=10) which is a vein. Also includes O ... [9602 chars truncated]
"A spice rub seasons only the cuts of meat that mirror its own blend — where the rub has flavor, the platter fills; where it is bare, the plate stays clean."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-section bento box has one compartment holding a small garnish arrangement. The garnish contains some filled and some empty spots.
Do: The garnish inspects its own arrangement: for each spot that holds flavor, it fills the corresponding compartment of the bento box with an identical garnish. Empty spots in the garnish mean empty compartments.
Grid: 9×9 grid of black cells, one color used. Output preserves dimensions with copies distributed across sections.
"A chord rings out and listens to its own harmonics — each note that vibrates spawns an echo in the matching resonance chamber, while muted strings leave silence."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-room concert hall has one room containing a small arrangement of sounding and silent strings.
Do: The chord examines which of its own strings vibrate. For each vibrating string, it projects a full echo of itself into the corresponding room. Silent strings produce no echo.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, single color. Output 9×9 with the pattern replicated into designated sections.
"A playbook diagram sends players to every position it marks on its own formation — the play replicates itself across the field wherever its X's appear."
120b: fail
See: A nine-zone field has a formation sketched in one zone, with some positions marked and others left open.
Do: The coach reads the formation's own marked positions. For each marked position, the entire formation is drawn into the matching zone of the field. Unmarked positions leave their zones empty.
Grid: 9×9 grid, black background, one non-black color. Output has copies placed in zones matching the formation's own filled positions.
We need to infer rule. The description: 9x9 grid divided into nine zones (3x3 blocks). There's a formation sketched in one zone, with some positions marked and others left open. For each marked position, the entire formation is drawn into the matching zone of the field. Unmarked positions leave their zones empty. Interpretation: Input grid has a pattern (non-black color) located within one of the nine 3x3 subgrids (zones). That pattern is the "formation". The positions of that pattern within its 3x3 zone (i.e., which cells are colored) indicate which zones (among the 9) should receive a copy of the formation. The output grid places copies of the formation into those zones, preserving orientation? Likely same orientation (no rotation). The original zone may also be filled? In examples, we can test. Example1: Input has orange O pattern in some zone. Let's locate. Input grid 9x9, with O's at coordinates (row4,col5), (row5,col5),(row5,col6),(row6,col4). Using 1-indexed rows. Let's map zones: each zone is 3x3. Zone rows: rows 1-3 zone top, 4-6 middle, 7-9 bottom. Similarly columns. The O's are in rows 4-6 (middle zone rows) and columns 4-6 (middle zone columns). So they are within the central zone (zone (2,2) if indexing 0-2). The pattern shape: let's draw 3x3 central zone coordinates relative to zone (rows 1-3, cols1-3). O positions: (row1? Actually row4 corresponds to zone row1). Row4 col5 => within zone col2 (since col4-6). So (1,2). Row5 col5 => (2,2). Row5 col6 => (2,3). Row6 col4 => (3,1). So pattern matrix: [ . O . ] [ . O O ] [ O . . ] Now output: we need to see copies placed in zones where the pattern has O's. That is, for each O in the pattern, we copy the whole pattern into the corresponding zone of the 3x3 grid of zones. So there are 4 O's, thus 4 zones will get the pattern. Which zones? The positions of O's within the central zone correspond to zone coordinates relative to overall grid: central zone is zone (2,2). The O at (1,2) corresponds to zone row1, col2 relative to central zone? Actually zone coordinates: zone rows 1-3, columns 1-3. So (1,2) corresponds to top middle zone (zone (1,2)). (2,2) corresponds to middle middle zone (the original zone). (2,3) corresponds to middle right zone (zone (2,3)). (3,1) corresponds to bottom left zone (zone (3,1)). So we expect copies of pattern placed in those zones. Let's verify output grid. Output shows O's across many positions. Let's extract zone (1,2) top middle (rows1-3, cols4-6). Output rows1-3 cols4-6: Row1 col6? Actually output row1: ". . . . . . . . O" So row1 col9 O. Not in that zone. Let's compute systematically. I'll reconstruct output grid from example1: Rows (1-index): 1: . . . . . . . . O 2: . . . . . . . O O 3: . . . . . . O . . 4: . . . . . O . . O 5: . . . . O O . O O 6: . . . O . . O . . 7: . . O . . . . . . 8: . O O . . . . . . 9: O . . . . . . . . Now let's map zones (3x3). Zone (1,1): rows1-3 cols1-3. Contains all '.' (since first three columns rows1-3 ar ... [10220 chars truncated]
"A storm cloud rains copies of itself onto every patch of ground its own shadow touches — where the cloud is thick, rain falls; where it is thin, the earth stays dry."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-patch sky has one patch containing a small cloud formation with dense and clear spots.
Do: The cloud casts its own shape downward as a map. Wherever the cloud is dense, a duplicate storm forms in the matching patch. Clear spots yield no storm.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one color. Output is 9×9 with storm copies placed per the cloud's own density pattern.
"A blueprint contains its own zoning plan — each room drawn on the blueprint dictates which lots in the city block receive a building made from that same blueprint."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A city block divided into nine lots has one lot containing a small architectural sketch. The sketch has built and empty cells.
Do: The sketch reads itself as a zoning map. For each built cell in the sketch, the corresponding lot in the city block gets an identical building. Empty cells mean vacant lots.
Grid: 9×9 grid, black is vacant, one color is built. Output places copies according to the sketch's own layout.
"A battle standard plants copies of itself at every outpost its own banner marks — where the flag bears an emblem, a garrison rises; where the flag is bare, no troops are sent."
120b: fail
See: A nine-sector battlefield has one sector containing a small banner pattern with marked and unmarked positions.
Do: The commander reads the banner like a deployment map. Each marked position on the banner means the entire banner is raised in the corresponding sector. Unmarked positions remain unoccupied.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, single color. Output mirrors the banner's self-referential deployment.
We need to infer rule. The description: 9x9 black grid, single color? Actually input has some colored cells forming a small pattern (banner) in top-left? In examples, pattern appears in upper-left corner? Let's examine. Example1 input: only O's in a small shape near center? Coordinates: rows 4-6 columns 4-6 maybe. Output shows O's placed in a pattern across whole grid, like a rotated or mirrored? Let's map. Let's index rows 0-8, cols 0-8. Input1 O positions: (3,4) (4,4),(4,5) (5,3) That's a small shape: like a diagonal? Output1 O positions: many O's forming a larger pattern. Let's list output O coordinates: Row0 col8 Row1 col7,8 Row2 col6 Row3 col5,8 Row4 col4,5,7,8 Row5 col3,6 Row6 col2 Row7 col1,2 Row8 col0 Looks like the pattern is reflected across both axes? Actually original shape seems to be placed in each of the 9 sectors? The description: nine-sector battlefield (3x3 sectors). Each sector contains a small banner pattern with marked and unmarked positions. The commander reads the banner like a deployment map. Each marked position on the banner means the entire banner is raised in the corresponding sector. Unmarked positions remain unoccupied. Interpretation: Input grid is 9x9, divided into 3x3 sectors each of size 3x3. Within each sector, there is a pattern (the "banner") that indicates which sectors should be filled? Wait: "single color. Output mirrors the banner's self-referential deployment." Possibly the pattern within a sector indicates which sectors (of the 9) get the whole pattern replicated. In example1, the input has O's only in the central sector? Let's see sector layout: sectors are 3x3 blocks. Central sector is rows 3-5, cols 3-5. Indeed O's are within that block: positions (3,4) (4,4)(4,5)(5,3). That's a pattern within central sector. Output shows O's spread across many sectors forming a larger pattern that seems to be the original pattern replicated in each sector where the original pattern had a mark? Wait the original pattern within central sector has marks at certain positions relative to sector (i.e., within 3x3). Those positions correspond to which sectors to fill with the whole pattern? Let's map: Within central sector (3x3), coordinates relative (0-2). O positions relative: (0,1), (1,1), (1,2), (2,0). So a 3x3 pattern. Now output: O's appear in many cells across whole grid. Let's see which sectors have O's. Sector indices (sector row, sector col) each 0-2. For each sector, we can see if the pattern is placed there. For example, sector (0,2) (top right) has O at (0,8) which is within that sector at relative (0,2). Also (1,7),(1,8) etc. Let's compute: Output O positions list earlier. Determine sector for each O: (0,8): sector (0,2) rel (0,2) (1,7): sector (0,2) rel (1,1) (1,8): sector (0,2) rel (1,2) (2,6): sector (0,2) rel (2,0) (3,5): sector (1,1) rel (0,2)?? Wait row3 col5: sector row=1 (since rows 3-5), col=1 (cols3-5). rel (0,2). That's O. (3,8): sector (1,2) rel (0,2) (4,4): sector (1,1) rel (1,1) (4,5): s ... [9581 chars truncated]
"A script writes stage directions for its own performance — each scene that appears in the script places a full troupe on the matching stage, while omitted scenes leave stages dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-stage theater complex has one stage holding a small arrangement of lit and dark positions.
Do: The arrangement reads itself as a program guide. For every lit position in the arrangement, the corresponding stage in the complex receives an identical show. Dark positions stay unlit.
Grid: 9×9 grid, black background, one color. Output replicates the show across stages per its own lit pattern.
"A seed pod scatters copies of itself only into the plots its own pattern of fertile and barren seeds dictates — where a seed is viable, a garden blooms identically."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nine-plot nursery has one plot containing a small seed arrangement with some sprouted and some dormant.
Do: The seed pod reads its own viability pattern. Each sprouted seed directs a full copy of the pod into the corresponding plot. Dormant seeds leave plots fallow.
Grid: 9×9 black grid, one non-black color. Output fills plots based on the pod's own sprouting pattern.
See: The input grid contains two kinds of colored elements against a black background. First, there is a single prominent shape made of one color, formed by the largest diagonally-connected component of any color. Second, there are several scattered 'marker' cells of various other colors (and possibly isolated cells of the shape's own color that are not connected to it). Exactly one marker sits on a corner of the grid. The remaining markers have varying colors, and one color among them is the most frequent.
Do: 1. Identify the main shape: find the largest connected component of any single color, using 8-connectivity (diagonal adjacency counts). Preserve this shape in the output exactly as it appears. 2. Identify all other non-black cells as markers. This includes cells of any other color AND any cells of the shape's color that are not part of its connected component. 3. Count the total number of markers: call this N. The triangle's leg length is N − 1. 4. Find the marker that sits exactly on a corner of the grid. This determines where the triangle is placed. Remove this marker. 5. Among the remaining markers, find the most frequent color. This is the triangle's fill color. Remove all markers from the grid. 6. Draw a filled right isosceles triangle with legs of length N − 1, right angle at the identified corner, extending inward along both grid edges. Specifically: at row/column distance d from the corner (d = 0 to N − 2), fill all cells from the corner along the perpendicular edge out to distance N − 2 − d. The triangle does not overwrite cells of the main shape.
Grid: Grids vary in size (not necessarily square), with black (.) as the background. The coordinate system is row-major: row 0 is the top, column 0 is the left. The four grid corners are (0,0), (0,W−1), (H−1,0), and (H−1,W−1). Exactly one marker always occupies one of these four corners.
"A mountain casts its shadow from the corner where a sentinel stands watch."
120b: k=2
See: Against the darkness, a great landmark stands — a constellation of connected cells in one color, the largest such formation on the field. Scattered around it are sentinel figures, lone colored cells standing at various posts. One sentinel has claimed a corner of the world as its watchtower. The others mill about the interior, and among them, one color appears more often than the rest — these are the shadow-bearers.
Do: The sentinel standing at the corner of the world sounds a horn and vanishes. All the other scattered figures dissolve as well, but not before their number is counted — their collective presence determines the size of the shadow they leave behind. The shadow takes the color of whichever sentinel tribe had the most members. From the now-empty corner, a great triangular shadow spreads inward along both walls, growing narrower as it reaches deeper into the grid — a right triangle whose legs stretch one fewer cell than the total number of sentinels that once stood. The ancient landmark is sacred ground; the shadow flows around it, never darkening its cells.
Grid: The world is a rectangular expanse of darkness. Its four corners are places of power — watchtowers where a sentinel may stand guard. Exactly one sentinel always occupies one of these watchtowers, and from that corner the shadow is cast inward, hugging both edges and tapering as it goes.
We need to decode puzzle. From description: "great landmark stands — a constellation of connected cells in one color, the largest such formation on the field." That's likely a connected component of same color (largest). In examples, we need to see. Example1 input grid 6 rows? Let's list. Input rows: Row1: . Y . . . . R . . Row2: . . . . . R . . . Row3: . . . . R . R . . Row4: . . . . . . . R . Row5: . . . Y . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . G Output rows: Row1: . . . . . . R . . Row2: . . . . . R . . . Row3: . . . . R . R . . Row4: . . . . . . . R . Row5: . . . . . . . . Y Row6: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: In input, there are Y at (1,2) and (5,4). R's many. G at (6,9). Output: Y's moved to bottom right corner area forming triangle? Let's see. Sentinel corner: "Exactly one sentinel always occupies one of these watchtowers". Sentinel likely a single cell of a color that is not part of the landmark? In example1, which corner has a single colored cell? Input corners: top-left (1,1) is ., top-right (1,9) ., bottom-left (6,1) ., bottom-right (6,9) G. So G at bottom-right corner is sentinel. So sentinel at corner is G. It "sounds a horn and vanishes". So G disappears from corner. Indeed output has no G (except maybe other G? there were none else). So G removed. Other scattered figures dissolve as well, but before they vanish, their number is counted — determines size of shadow they leave behind. The shadow takes the color of whichever sentinel tribe had the most members. So we need to count other colored cells that are "sentinels"? Actually "sentinel figures, lone colored cells standing at various posts." So these are isolated cells (not part of the landmark) maybe of any color. In example1, besides corner G, there are Y at (1,2) and (5,4). Are they isolated? Yes they are singletons not adjacent to same color. Also there is maybe other colors? Only R's are many and connected? R's form a shape maybe the landmark? Let's see connectivity: R cells positions: (1,7), (2,6), (3,5), (3,7), (4,8). Are they connected orthogonally? (1,7) adjacent to (2,7) none, (1,6) ., (1,8) ., (0,7) out. So not connected. Actually they are not orthogonally adjacent. Maybe connectivity includes diagonal? Not sure. But they might be considered separate. However description says "constellation of connected cells in one color, the largest such formation on the field." So we need to find largest connected component of any color. In example1, maybe the Y's are not connected, each isolated. R's also isolated. G only one. So largest component size is 1 (multiple). But maybe they consider connectivity including diagonal? Let's test: R at (1,7) and (2,6) are diagonal adjacent, maybe considered connected? If diagonal counts, then many R's could be connected forming shape. Let's see adjacency via 8-neighbor: (1,7) diagonal to (2,6) yes. (2,6) orthogonal to (3,6) none, diagonal to (3,5) yes. (3,5) orthogonal to (3,7) two apart, but diagonal to (4,6) none, but (3,7) diag ... [10319 chars truncated]
"A coral reef grows undisturbed while free-floating spores drift through the water. One spore lodges in a corner of the petri dish and triggers a colony bloom — the colony spreads inward in a wedge, taking on the pigment of whichever spore strain was most abundant. The other spores are consumed in the process."
120b: fail
See: A fixed organic structure and several isolated colored spores scattered across a dark medium, one touching the edge of the dish at a corner.
Do: The reef persists. The corner spore anchors a triangular colony that fans inward along both walls, colored by the dominant spore type. All free spores vanish, absorbed into the bloom. The colony's reach matches the original spore count.
Grid: Black background. One multi-cell shape preserved in place. A filled right triangle appears at one corner, spreading inward. All isolated cells disappear.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns): Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size 6x9: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: The "fixed organic structure" maybe the pattern of R's? In input there are red cells forming some shape: positions: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). That's like a diagonal line? Output retains same R positions unchanged. Indeed output rows 0-3 have same R positions. So the "multi-cell shape preserved in place" is the red shape. Other colored spores: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). G at (5,8). In output, Y's moved? Output has Y at (4,8) and (5,7),(5,8). Actually output row4 col8 Y, row5 col7 Y, row5 col8 Y. That's a right triangle anchored at corner? Which corner? The corner spore: maybe the G at (5,8) is at bottom right corner? Actually bottom right corner is (5,8) (0-index). That's G. In output, that G disappears; replaced by Y's forming triangle? Wait triangle of Y's appears at bottom right corner: positions (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a right triangle of size 2 (cells count = 3). The original G count is 1. But triangle has 3 cells, not matching count. However maybe the triangle size equals number of spores of dominant type? Let's see: there were Y spores count =2 (positions (0,1) and (4,3)). G count =1. The triangle uses Y color (dominant spore type). The triangle size maybe equals total number of Y spores? Triangle of size 2 (right triangle with legs length 2) contains 3 cells (n(n+1)/2). For n=2, cells=3. Not equal to 2. Hmm. But description: "The colony's reach matches the original spore count." Could mean the triangle's leg length equals count? For Y count=2, leg length 2? That matches: triangle of leg length 2 (i.e., 2 cells along each leg) anchored at corner. That triangle occupies 3 cells (including corner). So yes leg length = count of that color. The corner spore is the one touching edge at a corner. In input, which spore touches a corner? G at (5,8) touches bottom right corner (since grid 6x9, bottom row index5, rightmost column index8). That's a corner spore. Its color is G, but the triangle uses Y (dominant spore type). So the corner spore's color is not used; it's just anchor point. The dominant spore type among the other isolated spores (excluding the corner spore) is Y (2 vs G 1). So triangle color = Y. Leg length = count of Y =2. Triangle placed with right angle at that corner (bottom right) and extends inward along both walls (i.e., up and left). So cells: (5,8) corner itself? In output, corner cell (5,8) is Y (part of triangle). Indeed Y at (5,8). Also (5,7) left of corner, and (4,8) above corner. That's exactly a right triangle of leg length 2 covering those three cells. The original corner spor ... [6610 chars truncated]
"A constellation holds its ancient pattern in the night sky while rogue stars drift between the figures. One rogue has reached the corner of the star chart — it collapses into a nebula that expands in a triangular plume along both chart edges, glowing in the spectral color of the most common rogue star type. The other rogues are drawn in and disappear."
120b: fail
See: A star pattern and scattered colored points on a dark sky chart, one point at a chart corner.
Do: The constellation persists. A triangular nebula fans from the corner along both edges, colored by the most frequent rogue star type. All rogue stars are absorbed. The nebula's extent equals the count of rogues.
Grid: Black sky. Constellation intact. Filled right triangle from corner. Isolated star-dots removed.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 input grid 6 rows? Let's count: Input lines: ". Y . . . . R . ." ". . . . . R . . ." ". . . . R . R . ." ". . . . . . . R ." ". . . Y . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . G" That's 6 rows, 9 columns. Output: ". . . . . . R . ." ". . . . . R . . ." ". . . . R . R . ." ". . . . . . . R ." ". . . . . . . . Y" ". . . . . . . Y Y" Observations: In input, there are some colored points: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). R's at various positions, G at (5,8). Output: The original R pattern seems unchanged (same positions). Y's moved? In output, Y's appear at bottom right triangle? Let's see output Y positions: (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). Actually output row4 (0-index) ". . . . . . . . Y" => Y at column8. Row5 ". . . . . . . Y Y" => Y at col7 and col8. So Y's formed a right triangle anchored at bottom right corner? The corner is bottom right? Input grid size 6x9, bottom right corner is (5,8). Indeed Y's occupy positions forming a filled right triangle with right angle at bottom right corner, extending up-left? Let's map: cells with Y in output: (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a triangle of size 2? Count of rogue stars? In input, rogue stars maybe Y's? There are two Y's in input (positions (0,1) and (4,3)). Also G at (5,8) maybe also rogue? The description: "scattered colored points on a dark sky chart, one point at a chart corner." In example1, there is a G at bottom right corner (5,8) which is a point at a corner. So that matches "one point at a chart corner". The other colored points are Y's (maybe rogue stars). The most frequent rogue star type? Y appears twice, G appears once (but G is at corner, maybe not considered rogue). So most frequent rogue star type is Y. So the triangle is colored by Y. Extent equals count of rogues (number of rogue points). There are 2 Y's, so triangle size maybe 2? Indeed triangle of size 2 (height 2) anchored at corner (bottom right). The triangle includes cells: for size n, fill right triangle of n rows along top and left edges? Let's define: right triangle with right angle at corner, legs along top row (going left) and left column (going up) of length n? For bottom right corner, legs go up and left. For n=2, cells: (5,8) corner maybe not filled? In output, corner (5,8) is Y (yes). Also (5,7) and (4,8) are Y. That's exactly the cells where either row index = bottom row and col >= bottom - (n-1)?? Actually coordinates: bottom row index 5, columns 8,7 (two cells). Row 4 column 8 (one cell). That's a right triangle of size 2 (including corner). So rule: fill triangle of size equal to count of rogue points, using the most frequent rogue color, anchored at the corner point (the one that is at a corner). Remove all rogue points (they are absorbed). The original other elements (like R) remain unchanged. Check example1: corner point is G at (5,8). After transformation, that G disappears (absorbed) and replaced by Y triangle. Indeed output has no G. So corner point is removed. Now example ... [11268 chars truncated]
"A reef formation lies beneath the surface while colored buoys bob across the dark water. The harbor buoy moored at the corner of the chart signals incoming tide — water rushes in as a triangular surge along both seawalls, colored by the sediment of whichever buoy type was most plentiful. All buoys are swept under as the tide fills in."
120b: fail
See: A submerged formation and scattered colored buoys on a dark chart, one buoy anchored at a corner.
Do: The reef is undisturbed. From the corner buoy, a triangular tidal fill advances along both walls, dyed by the dominant buoy color. All buoys are submerged. The tide's reach matches the buoy count.
Grid: Dark water. Reef shape preserved. Right triangle filled from corner. Buoy markers removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns): Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: Original had Y at (0,1) and (4,3). R at many positions. G at (5,8). Output: Y's moved? In output Y appears at (4,8) and (5,7),(5,8). Actually output row4 col8 Y, row5 col7 Y, row5 col8 Y. So Y's formed a right triangle anchored at bottom right corner? Let's see: The "corner buoy" maybe the bottom right corner? In input, there is a G at bottom right corner (row5 col8). That's a buoy (color G). In output, G is gone (replaced by Y?). Actually output has no G. So the "dominant buoy color" maybe the most frequent non-black color? In input, colors: Y appears 2, R appears many (maybe 5), G appears 1. Dominant is R. But triangle filled with R? In output, triangle of R? Let's see: Output has R at same positions as input except maybe some removed? Actually output row0 col6 R same as input. Row1 col5 R same. Row2 col4 R and col6 R same. Row3 col7 R same. So R unchanged. So triangle not R. Maybe the corner buoy is at a corner that has a buoy (non-black). In input, bottom right corner (row5 col8) is G. So corner buoy color G. Then triangular fill from that corner along both walls (i.e., up and left) with the dominant buoy color (maybe the most common color overall, which is R). The fill reaches number of buoys count (total buoys?). Count buoys: Y(2)+R(5)+G(1)=8. So triangle of size 8 cells? Let's see output: new Y's appear forming triangle of size? Actually Y's appear in bottom right area, not G. Wait triangle fill maybe of Y? Let's compute: The new Y's are at (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a small triangle of 3 cells. Not 8. Maybe the rule: Identify the unique color that appears only once (the corner buoy). Then fill a right triangle from that corner using the most frequent other color, and replace original corner color with that color? But output shows Y's (which were not dominant). Hmm. Let's examine: The corner buoy is at (5,8) G (unique). The dominant buoy color among others maybe Y? Actually Y appears 2, R appears 5. So dominant is R. But triangle filled with Y? Not matching. Maybe the "dominant buoy color" means the color that appears most along the border? Not. Let's think differently: The output removed all original buoys except those that are part of a right triangle anchored at corner buoy? In output, the original R's remain unchanged. The Y's moved to form triangle anchored at corner (bottom right). The original Y's were at (0,1) and (4,3). They got relocated to bottom right triangle. The G at corner disappeared. So maybe rule: Take the color that appears exactly twice (Y) and use it to fill triangle from corner b ... [9799 chars truncated]
"A circuit trace runs across a dark PCB while loose solder beads dot the board. One bead has rolled to the corner pad — it bridges the contact and a current fans out in a triangular flood fill along both board edges, glowing in the hue of whichever solder alloy was most common. The stray beads are vaporized by the surge."
120b: fail
See: A circuit path and scattered colored solder beads on a dark board, one bead on a corner pad.
Do: The trace is preserved. A triangular current surge flows from the corner along both edges, colored by the dominant solder type. All loose beads vanish. The surge's area corresponds to the bead count.
Grid: Dark board. Trace unchanged. Filled right triangle from corner. Isolated bead-dots removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns?). Let's write coordinates. Row0: ". Y . . . . R . ." (positions 0-8) Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . Y . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . G" Output grid same size 6x9. Output rows: Row0: ". . . . . . R . ." Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . Y" Row5: ". . . . . . . Y Y" Observations: The trace (maybe the R's?) unchanged? In input there are R's at (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). Output same positions unchanged. So red beads (R) are trace preserved. Other colored beads: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). G at (5,8). In output, Y's moved? Output has Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). Actually output row4 col8 Y, row5 col7 Y, row5 col8 Y. That's a right triangle filled with Y's? Let's see shape: corner maybe at (0,1)?? Wait triangular surge from corner along both edges. Which corner? "one bead on a corner pad". In input there is a Y at (0,1) not corner. But maybe corner is top-left? There is no bead at (0,0). However there is a Y at (4,3) not corner. Hmm. Maybe the rule: Identify the dominant non-trace color (most frequent) among non-R beads. In input, colors: Y appears twice, G once. So dominant is Y. Then fill a right triangle with that color, with right angle at the corner where a bead of that color is located? There is a Y at (0,1) near top edge but not corner. Another Y at (4,3). Which one is corner? Not clear. Output triangle appears in bottom right region: positions (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a 2x2 right triangle with right angle at (5,7)? Actually cells: (5,7) Y, (5,8) Y, (4,8) Y. That's a right triangle with right angle at (5,7) (bottom-left of triangle). The corner pad maybe (5,7) originally had no bead. So triangle area corresponds to bead count: there were 3 beads total (2 Y + 1 G) =3. Triangle of size 2 (right triangle with 3 cells). Indeed number of cells in right triangle of leg length n is n(n+1)/2. For n=2, cells=3. So matches bead count 3. So we need to create a right triangle of size such that number of cells equals total number of non-R beads? Let's test: total non-R beads = Y(2)+G(1)=3. Triangle of size 2 gives 3 cells. Good. Color of triangle: "colored by the dominant solder type" i.e., most frequent non-R color, which is Y. So triangle filled with Y. Placement: "triangular current surge flows from the corner along both edges". Which corner? Possibly the corner that is farthest from the trace? Or maybe the corner that is empty? In example, triangle placed at bottom right corner (row5 col8 is bottom right cell). Indeed bottom right corner of grid is (5,8). The triangle occupies bottom right corner area. So the surge originates from that corner (bottom right). So rule: fill right triangle anchored at bottom right corner (or maybe any corner) with dominant color, size determined by count of non-R beads, a ... [8920 chars truncated]
"A dragon sleeps coiled on the dark plain while enchanted gemstones are scattered around it. One gem has come to rest at the corner of the world — it shatters and releases a curse that spreads in a triangular shadow along both world-edges, taking the color of whichever gem type was most abundant. The remaining gems crumble to dust as the curse passes."
120b: fail
See: A sleeping beast and scattered colored gems on a dark plain, one gem at the world's corner.
Do: The dragon remains. A triangular curse expands from the corner along both borders, colored by the most common gem. All gems disintegrate. The curse's reach matches the total gem count.
Grid: Black plain. Beast shape intact. Filled right triangle from corner. Gem markers erased.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns?). Let's write coordinates. Row0: ". Y . . . . R . ." (positions 0-8). Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . Y . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . G Output grid same size 6x9. Output rows: Row0: ". . . . . . R . ." Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . Y" Row5: ". . . . . . . Y Y" Observations: Original had Y at (0,1) and (4,3). R at (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). G at (5,8). Output: Y's moved? In output Y appears at (4,8) and (5,7),(5,8). So Y's moved to bottom right corner region forming triangle? Also R's remain same positions? Let's compare: R positions unchanged? Input R at (0,6) output same (0,6). (1,5) same. (2,4) same. (2,6) same. (3,7) same. So all R unchanged. G at (5,8) disappeared (becomes Y). So rule: keep "beast" shape? The description: "dragon remains". Maybe the "beast" is a shape formed by red gems? The "most common gem" color is red (R appears 5 times). The triangular curse expands from corner along both borders, colored by most common gem. All gems disintegrate. The curse's reach matches total gem count. Interpretation: Count total gems (non-black cells) in input. In example1, total gems = Y(2)+R(5)+G(1)=8. The triangle from corner (which corner? "world's corner" maybe bottom right? In description: "one gem at the world's corner." In input there is a gem at corner? In example1, there is G at bottom right corner (row5 col8). That's the gem at world's corner. So corner is bottom right. The triangle expands from that corner along both borders (i.e., up and left) forming a right triangle with legs along bottom row and rightmost column. Fill triangle with most common gem color (R). But output shows triangle of Y not R. Wait triangle of Y appears at bottom right region: positions (4,8), (5,7),(5,8). That's a small triangle of size 2? Let's compute: total gems =8, triangle area (including corner) should have 8 cells? Right triangle with legs length n has n*(n+1)/2 cells. Find n such that n*(n+1)/2 = total gems =8. Solve n^2 + n -16 =0 => n≈3.5. Not integer. Maybe they count only gems other than the corner gem? Or maybe they fill with most common gem among remaining after removing corner? Let's compute most common gem among all gems? R is most common (5). But triangle filled with Y (yellow) which appears 2 times, not most common. Hmm. Maybe the "most common gem" among those that are not part of the beast (dragon). The beast maybe the shape formed by red gems (dragon). So the most common gem among the rest (non-dragon) is Y (2) vs G (1). So Y is most common among non-dragon gems. Then triangle filled with Y. That matches output: triangle of Y placed at bottom right corner, covering 3 cells? But total non-dragon gems count = 3 (2 Y + 1 G). Triangle area of size n=2 gives 3 cells (2*3/2=3). Yes! So tr ... [9351 chars truncated]
"A lead dancer holds a frozen pose on the dark floor while partner dancers stand scattered, each wearing a different color sash. The caller at the corner of the ballroom claps — a formation unfurls from that corner in a triangular sweep along both walls, all dancers joining in the color of the largest troupe. The scattered dancers dissolve into the formation."
120b: fail
See: A posed figure and scattered colored dancers on a dark floor, one dancer at a corner.
Do: The lead pose is unchanged. A triangular dance formation fans from the corner along both walls, taking the most common sash color. All scattered dancers are absorbed. The formation's depth equals the dancer count.
Grid: Dark floor. Lead shape preserved. Right triangle filled from corner. Isolated colored cells removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine. Example1 Input (6 rows, 9 columns?). Let's write coordinates. Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output (6 rows, 9 cols): Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: The "lead pose" unchanged: maybe the pattern of R's (red) forms a shape that stays same. Indeed red positions in input: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). Output red same positions? Check: output row0 col6 R yes. row1 col5 R yes. row2 col4 R yes, col6 R yes. row3 col7 R yes. So red unchanged. Other colors: Y (yellow) at (0,1) and (4,3). In output they moved to bottom right corner forming triangle? Output Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). That's a right triangle of Y's with corner at (5,7)? Actually positions: (5,7) and (5,8) and (4,8). That's a right triangle of size 2 (depth 2). The corner (right angle) at (5,7) which is bottom-left of triangle? Let's see: triangle occupies rows 4-5, cols 7-8. That's a 2x2 right triangle (including cells (5,7) (5,8) (4,8)). So depth equals dancer count? There were 2 Y cells originally. So depth = count =2. The triangle is placed at a corner along both walls: which corner? In description: "triangular dance formation fans from the corner along both walls". Which corner? Possibly bottom right corner? In output triangle is at bottom right corner (rows 4-5, cols 7-8) which is bottom right of grid (since 6 rows, 9 cols). Indeed corner cell (5,8) is bottom rightmost cell, but triangle includes (5,7) left of it and (4,8) above it. So right angle at (5,7) which is adjacent to bottom and right walls? Actually right angle at (5,7) touches bottom wall (row5) and not right wall (col7 not last). The triangle's legs go up and right along walls? Wait leg along bottom wall: cells (5,7) and (5,8) are along bottom row. Leg along right wall: cells (5,8) and (4,8) are along rightmost column. So the right angle is at (5,7) which is one cell left of corner, but the legs extend to walls. So the triangle "fans from the corner" meaning the right angle is one cell away from corner? Hmm. The triangle uses the most common sash color among scattered dancers? In example, scattered colors besides red: Y (2), G (1). Most common is Y (2). So triangle filled with Y. G at (5,8) originally? Actually G at (5,8) input row5 col8 G. In output that G is gone (absorbed). So scattered dancers are removed. Thus rule: Identify the color (excluding the "lead pose" color) that appears most frequently among non-lead cells. Then create a right triangle of that color anchored at bottom right corner (or maybe a specific corner) with size equal to count of that color. Fill triangle cells (including along bottom row and rightmost column) with that color, overwriting any existing cells (including black). Keep l ... [11309 chars truncated]
"A crystalline vein runs through dark bedrock while mineral deposits of various colors are scattered in the stone. One deposit has surfaced at the corner of the excavation — it triggers a landslide that fans inward in a triangular debris field along both quarry walls, colored by whichever mineral was most prevalent. The isolated deposits are buried as the slide settles."
120b: fail
See: A mineral vein and scattered colored deposits in dark rock, one deposit at an excavation corner.
Do: The vein persists. A triangular landslide fans from the corner along both walls, colored by the dominant mineral. All deposits are buried. The slide's extent matches the deposit count.
Grid: Dark rock. Vein unchanged. Filled right triangle from corner spreading inward. Scattered deposits removed.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with black '.' background, a "vein" maybe a line of a certain color? In example1 input: there are R's forming a diagonal? Let's view coordinates. Input 6 rows, 9 columns. Rows: 1: . Y . . . . R . . 2: . . . . . R . . . 3: . . . . R . R . . 4: . . . . . . . R . 5: . . . Y . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . G Output: 1: . . . . . . R . . 2: . . . . . R . . . 3: . . . . R . R . . 4: . . . . . . . R . 5: . . . . . . . . Y 6: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: The original R's remain unchanged (positions same). The Y's moved? Input Y at (1,2) and (5,4). Output Y's at (5,9) and (6,8),(6,9). So they moved to bottom right corner forming a right triangle? The description: "triangular landslide fans from the corner along both walls, colored by the dominant mineral." The corner is "excavation corner" maybe bottom right? In example1, corner appears bottom right (row6 col9). The slide forms a right triangle with legs along bottom row and rightmost column. The triangle filled with Y (dominant mineral color). The number of Y deposits originally? Input had 2 Y's. Output triangle has 3 Y's? Actually positions: (5,9), (6,8), (6,9) = 3 cells. That's more than 2. But maybe count includes original Y's? The slide's extent matches the deposit count. Maybe the triangle size is equal to number of Y deposits? Let's compute: number of Y =2. Triangle of size 2? Right triangle with legs length 2? That would have cells: (row5,col9) and (row6,col8) and (row6,col9) = 3 cells (size n yields n(n+1)/2 cells). For n=2, cells=3. So matches. So they fill triangle of size equal to count of that color, anchored at corner (bottom right). The triangle is filled with that color, overriding previous content (but original Y's are removed? Actually original Y's were at other places, they disappear; they are "buried". So they are removed, and new Y's appear in triangle. Now what about other colors? In example1, there is a G at (6,9) originally? Actually input row6 col9 is G (since row6: . . . . . . . . G). Output row6 col9 is Y (overwrites G). So G is removed. So only the dominant mineral (maybe the most frequent color among deposits?) is used to fill triangle. In example1, colors present besides R (vein) are Y (2) and G (1). Dominant is Y. So triangle filled with Y. Now example2: Input 11 rows, 10 columns? Let's count rows: given lines. Row0? Actually first line: ". . . . . . . . . . ." (10). So 11 rows, 10 columns. We need to see colors: O (orange), B (blue), R (red), G (green), A (azure). Also there is a row with "A . . . . . . . . . ." at row10 (index 10). Output shows many R's forming triangle at bottom left corner? Let's examine output. Output rows: 1: all . (row0) 2: all . 3: . . . . . . . O . . . 4: . . . . . . . . O . . 5: . . . . . . . . O O . 6: . . . . . . . O . . O 7: R . . . . . O . . . . 8: R R . . . . . . . . . 9: R R R . . . . . . . . 10: R R R R . . . . . . . 11: R R R R R . . . . . . So triangle of R's at bottom le ... [10675 chars truncated]
"A fondant sculpture sits on a baking sheet while scattered sugar crystals dot the surface. One crystal in the corner of the sheet melts first, sending a warm glaze flowing inward — a wedge of icing that takes the color of whatever sugar was most plentiful. The sculpture stays untouched beneath its glaze-proof shell."
120b: fail
See: A decorated form and loose colored sprinkles on a dark tray, with one sprinkle sitting precisely in a corner.
Do: The fondant form remains. The corner sprinkle melts into a triangular glaze spreading along both edges of the tray, dyed the most common sprinkle color. All sprinkles dissolve. The glaze thins as it moves away from the corner.
Grid: Dark background. Preserved shape unchanged. Triangular fill from one corner tapering inward. Scattered dots removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns? Actually given lines: first line ". Y . . . . R . ." that's 9 columns. So 6 rows, 9 cols. Output grid also 6 rows, 9 cols. Let's map positions. I'll index rows 0-5, cols 0-8. Input positions with non-black (non .) are: row0 col1 Y, col6 R. row1 col5 R. row2 col4 R, col6 R. row3 col7 R. row4 col3 Y. row5 col7 G. Output: row0 col6 R (same as input row0 col6). row1 col5 R (same). row2 col4 R, col6 R (same). row3 col7 R (same). row4 col8 Y (new). row5 col7 Y, col8 Y (new). Also note original Y at row0 col1 disappeared, Y at row4 col3 disappeared, G at row5 col7 disappeared. So only R's remain unchanged. The Y's and G are removed, replaced by a triangular fill of Y? Actually new Y's appear at bottom right corner region: row4 col8, row5 col7, row5 col8. That's a right triangle with right angle at bottom right corner (row5 col8). The fill color is the most common sprinkle color? In input, colors: Y appears twice, R appears five times, G appears once. Most common is R. But the new fill is Y, not R. Wait maybe the corner sprinkle is the one at a corner? In description: "one sprinkle sitting precisely in a corner." In input, there is a sprinkle at a corner? Let's see: any non- . at a corner (0,0), (0,8), (5,0), (5,8). Input has none. Hmm maybe the corner sprinkle is the one that is isolated? In example, there is a Y at row4 col3 not corner. G at row5 col7 near bottom right but not corner. The new triangle appears at bottom right corner (row5 col8). The color used is Y, which is the most common non-R? Actually Y appears twice, G once. So Y is most common among non-R? But rule says "corner sprinkle melts into a triangular glaze spreading along both edges of the tray, dyed the most common sprinkle color." The corner sprinkle maybe the one that is at a corner of the shape? The shape is "fondant form" maybe the pattern of R's? The R's form a shape that remains unchanged. The corner sprinkle maybe the one that is at a corner of the shape? Let's see R positions: they form a diagonal line from (0,6) down to (3,7) etc. Not a shape with corners. Hmm. Alternatively maybe the rule: Keep the most frequent color unchanged (R). Remove all other colors, and fill a right triangle at bottom right corner with the second most frequent color (Y). The triangle size maybe based on count of removed colors? In example, removed colors Y (2) and G (1). The triangle has 3 cells (row4 col8, row5 col7, row5 col8) = 3 cells. That's equal to total number of removed cells? Removed cells count = 3 (Y at (0,1), Y at (4,3), G at (5,7)). Yes exactly 3. The triangle of size 3 cells placed at bottom right corner, filling with the most common removed color (Y). That matches: The most common among removed colors is Y (2 vs G 1). So triangle filled with Y. Thus rule: Identify the most frequent color overall? In example, R is most frequent overall (5). Those stay unchanged. All oth ... [10328 chars truncated]
"A melody's notation hangs on the staff while stray notes have fallen off their lines. One note has drifted into the corner of the page and begins to resonate — its vibration fills a triangular region of the score with harmony, colored by whichever pitch class had the most fallen notes. The stray notes are silenced as the resonance absorbs them."
120b: fail
See: A composed motif on a dark score and several displaced note-dots of varying tones, one resting in a page corner.
Do: The motif is unchanged. From the corner note, a triangular wash of sound fills inward along both margins, taking the hue of the most common displaced pitch. All stray notes vanish. The triangle's depth reflects how many notes were displaced.
Grid: Black field. Original connected shape intact. Right triangle from corner, sized by marker count, colored by majority. Isolated dots erased.
We need to decode the puzzle. The description: "A composed motif on a dark score and several displaced note-dots of varying tones, one resting in a page corner." So there is an original connected shape (motif) unchanged. Several displaced note-dots (isolated cells) of varying colors, one in a corner. The rule: From the corner note, a triangular wash of sound fills inward along both margins, taking the hue of the most common displaced pitch. All stray notes vanish. The triangle's depth reflects how many notes were displaced. Thus: Input grid: black background '.'; there is a connected shape (maybe a line or shape) that stays unchanged. There are isolated single cells (dots) of various colors, not part of the main shape. One of those isolated dots is located in a corner of the grid (maybe top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The rule: create a right triangle (filled) from that corner, extending inward along both margins (i.e., along the two edges meeting at that corner). The size (depth) of triangle equals the number of displaced notes (i.e., number of isolated dots). The triangle is colored with the majority color among those displaced notes (excluding the corner note? Probably includes all displaced notes). All other stray notes (isolated dots) are erased (set to black). The original shape remains unchanged. Let's verify with examples. Example 1 Input grid (size? 6 rows, 9 columns). Let's map. I'll write coordinates row, col (0-index). Input: Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G We need to identify original connected shape: maybe the R's form a shape? Let's see positions of R: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). That's a diagonal line? They are connected via adjacency? Usually adjacency is orthogonal (4-neighbor). Let's see connections: (0,6) adjacent to (1,5) diagonally not orthogonal. (1,5) adjacent to (2,5) but that's '.'; (2,4) adjacent to (1,4) '.'; So maybe not connected. Maybe the shape is the Y's? Y at (0,1) and (4,3). Not connected. G at (5,8) isolated. So maybe the "motif" is the cluster of R's that are connected via orthogonal? Let's check connectivity: (2,4) adjacent to (2,6) not; (2,6) adjacent to (3,7) diagonal; So none are orthogonal. So maybe connectivity includes diagonal? If diagonal counts, they could be connected as a shape? Let's see: (0,6) diagonal to (1,5) yes; (1,5) diagonal to (2,4) yes; (2,4) orthogonal to (2,5) '.'; (2,6) diagonal to (1,5) and (3,7). So they form a diagonal line shape maybe considered the motif. That shape remains unchanged in output. Now output grid: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: The original R's remain same positions? Let's compare: Input R positions: (0,6) stays R; (1,5) stays R; (2,4) stays R; (2,6) stays R; (3,7) stays R. Yes unchanged. Now Y's: I ... [10681 chars truncated]
"The team's formation holds its shape on the field while substitute players wait on the sidelines. The referee standing in the corner flag signals the play — fans in that corner section rise in a wave, coloring the stands with the most popular team jersey. The substitutes leave the bench as the wave crescendos."
120b: fail
See: A tactical formation and scattered reserve players on a dark pitch, with one figure planted at a corner flag.
Do: The formation is unchanged. A triangular fan wave erupts from the corner flag inward, colored by the most common reserve jersey. All reserves exit. The wave's size matches the number of reserves plus the referee.
Grid: Dark ground. Shape preserved. Filled triangle from corner extending inward along both edges. Scattered cells removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns? Actually lines show 9 columns). Let's write coordinates. Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size 6x9. Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: In input, there are some colored cells: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). R at (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). G at (5,8). Output: many of those removed? Let's compare. R positions remain same? Check: (0,6) stays R. (1,5) stays R. (2,4) stays R. (2,6) stays R. (3,7) stays R. So all R unchanged. Y positions: input Y at (0,1) removed (output .). Y at (4,3) removed. Output has Y's at (4,8) and (5,7),(5,8). So Y moved to bottom right corner area forming a triangle? Indeed output Y's form a filled right triangle with right angle at bottom right corner (row5 col8 is corner). The triangle includes cells (5,8), (5,7), (4,8). That's a 2x2 triangle (size 2). Number of Y's = 3 (size of triangle = n(n+1)/2? For n=2, triangle cells = 3). Input had 2 Y's (reserves). Also there is G at (5,8) originally, but output G removed? Actually output at (5,8) is Y, not G. So G (maybe referee?) removed. Interpretation: "most common reserve jersey" = color that appears most among scattered reserves (non-formation). In example, reserves are Y and G? Y appears twice, G once. So most common is Y. So wave colored Y. Reserves exit: original reserve cells become empty (black .). Indeed Y cells removed, G removed. Wave size matches number of reserves plus the referee. Number of reserves = count of reserve cells? In example, reserves are Y (2) and G (1) maybe G is referee? Wait "plus the referee". The referee maybe a distinct color? In example, maybe G is referee (different color). So total = reserves (2) + referee (1) = 3. Triangle size (number of cells) = 3 matches. Triangle fan wave erupts from corner flag inward, colored by most common reserve jersey. Corner flag is a corner cell? In output, triangle anchored at bottom right corner (row5 col8). That's a corner of grid. So wave extends inward along both edges from that corner, forming a right triangle with legs along bottom row and rightmost column. Thus rule: Identify a corner cell that contains a distinct color? In example, corner (5,8) originally G (referee). That is the corner flag. The wave originates there, covering a right triangle of size N where N = number of reserve cells (including referee?) Actually includes referee as part of count. The triangle includes the corner cell itself? In output, corner cell becomes Y (most common reserve color), not G. So the corner cell is replaced by the wave color. Thus we need to count total number of "reserve" cells plus the corner cell (referee). The corner cell is the only non- ... [10897 chars truncated]
"A mountain range stands firm while raindrops are scattered across the valley. A storm cell anchors itself in the corner of the map, and precipitation fans out in a triangular downpour — the rain takes on the tint of whatever mineral dust was most common in the scattered drops. The old drops evaporate as the storm washes through."
120b: k=1
See: A terrain feature and isolated colored droplets on a dark map, one droplet pinned to a corner.
Do: The terrain endures. From the corner, a wedge-shaped deluge spreads inward along both map edges, colored by the most frequent droplet mineral. All prior droplets vanish. The storm's reach equals the original droplet count.
Grid: Black background. Shape untouched. Right isosceles triangle filled from corner. Isolated markers removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (I'll index rows): Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size 6x9? Let's list output rows: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: Original shape (maybe some pattern) remains? The "terrain feature" maybe the existing red line? In input there are red R's forming a diagonal? Let's map coordinates (col index 0-8). Input R positions: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7), (5,8). That's like a line from top right moving down-left? Actually they form a shape maybe a right isosceles triangle? Let's see output: R positions same as input except (0,6) moved? Output row0 col6 still R. Row1 col5 R same. Row2 col4 R same, col6 R same. Row3 col7 R same. Row5 col8? In output row5 col8 is Y, not R. So R at (5,8) disappeared. Also new Y's appear at (4,8) and (5,7),(5,8). Actually output row4 col8 Y, row5 col7 Y, row5 col8 Y. So a wedge of Y's (yellow) appears in bottom right corner, forming a right isosceles triangle with right angle at bottom right corner? Let's see shape: bottom right corner is (5,8). The triangle includes cells (5,8), (5,7), (4,8). That's a 2x2 right triangle (including corner). That's wedge of size equal to number of Y droplets originally? In input there were Y droplets: positions (0,1) and (4,3). That's two Y's. The wedge size seems to be 2? Actually number of Y droplets =2. The triangle of Y in output has 3 cells (including corner). Wait count: cells filled with Y in output: (4,8), (5,7), (5,8) = 3 cells. That's not 2. Maybe the wedge size equals total number of droplets of most frequent color? Let's count colors: Y appears 2 times, R appears 6? Actually R appears 6? Let's count: R at (0,6),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(3,7),(5,8) =6. G appears 0, O 0, etc. So most frequent droplet mineral is R (red). But wedge is colored by most frequent droplet mineral? The description: "colored by the most frequent droplet mineral." In output wedge is Y, not R. So maybe most frequent among isolated droplets (those not part of shape). The shape maybe the "terrain feature" which is the line of R's? Those are considered terrain, not droplets. Droplets are other colors (Y). In input there are Y droplets (2). So most frequent droplet color is Y (only color). So wedge colored Y matches. Good. Now wedge size equals original droplet count (number of droplets). There were 2 Y droplets, wedge size maybe 2? But we got 3 cells. How to define size? Perhaps wedge is a right isosceles triangle with leg length equal to droplet count? Leg length = count? If leg length =2, then triangle would have cells: corner (0,0), plus (0,1) and (1,0) maybe 3 cells. That's what we see: corner at bottom right (5,8) plus two cells adjacent along edges (upwards and leftwar ... [10696 chars truncated]
"A cathedral's flying buttresses arch across the blueprint while loose bricks lie scattered on the drafting table. One brick has slid to the corner of the paper — from there, a foundation is drawn: a triangular footprint spreading along both edges, shaded in the color of whichever brick type was most common. The loose bricks are swept away as the plan takes shape."
120b: fail
See: An architectural feature and stray colored blocks on a dark blueprint, one block at a precise corner.
Do: The buttress design stays. A triangular foundation radiates from the corner block along both borders, colored by the dominant brick. All loose blocks are cleared. The foundation's scale depends on how many blocks were scattered.
Grid: Dark field. Existing structure preserved. Filled right triangle from corner, tapering inward. Scattered elements removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns?). Let's write coordinates. Row0: ". Y . . . . R . ." (col0 '.' col1 Y col2 '.' ... col6 R col7 '.' col8 '.') Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . Y . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . G" Output grid same size 6x9: Row0: ". . . . . . R . ." Row1: ". . . . . R . . ." Row2: ". . . . R . R . ." Row3: ". . . . . . . R ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . Y" Row5: ". . . . . . . Y Y" Observations: The original "structure" maybe a "buttress" shape: there is a line of R's forming a diagonal? Let's see input R positions: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). That's like a shape maybe a "buttress" (vertical/horizontal?). Also Y at (0,1) and (4,3). G at (5,8). Output: R's remain same? Check: output R positions: (0,6) same, (1,5) same, (2,4) same, (2,6) same, (3,7) same. So R's unchanged. Y's moved: originally Y at (0,1) and (4,3). Output Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). Actually output Y's: row4 col8, row5 col7, row5 col8. That's a right triangle anchored at corner? The description: "triangular foundation radiates from the corner block along both borders, colored by the dominant brick." The corner block maybe the "loose block" that is at a precise corner? In input, there is a G at (5,8) which is bottom right corner? Actually bottom right corner is (5,8) (since 6 rows, 9 cols). That's G. In output, that G is gone (cleared). Instead Y's fill a right triangle with right angle at that corner? Let's see triangle from corner (5,8) along both borders (bottom row and rightmost column) moving inward. The triangle would include cells (5,8) corner, then (5,7), (4,8) maybe (5,6),(4,7),(3,8) etc. But output shows Y at (5,7),(5,8?) Actually output row5 col8 is Y, row5 col7 Y, row4 col8 Y. That's a small triangle of size 2? The dominant brick color maybe Y (since there were Y's in input). The number of scattered blocks maybe determines size: there were 2 Y's originally? Actually there were 2 Y's. The triangle size maybe equal to count of Y's? Let's test: count of Y in input = 2. Triangle of size 2 (i.e., leg length 2) would have cells: corner (5,8), then one step left (5,7), one step up (4,8), and maybe also (5,6)?? For size 2, the right triangle includes cells where row offset + col offset <= size? Usually a right triangle of leg length n includes n cells on each leg including corner? For n=2, legs have 2 cells each: corner plus one more each direction. That matches (5,8) corner, (5,7) left, (4,8) up. That's exactly output Y's (but also (5,8) is Y). So triangle of size equal to number of Y's? Yes. The original Y's were removed (cleared). The G at corner also cleared (replaced by Y). So rule: Identify a "corner block" which is a non-black cell located at a precise corner of the grid? In example, bottom right corner had G (maybe the "precise corner block"). The dominant brick color among scattered blocks (non-structure) ... [7512 chars truncated]
"A fortress holds its ground on the battlefield while scouts are deployed across the terrain. The scout posted at the corner of the map signals a flanking maneuver — troops advance in a triangular formation from that corner, wearing the colors of whichever regiment had the most scouts. All scouts fall back as the advance begins."
120b: fail
See: A fortification and dispersed colored scouts on a dark battlefield, one scout occupying a corner position.
Do: The fortress stands. From the corner scout's position, a triangular troop advance fans inward along both borders in the most common scout regiment's color. All scouts withdraw. The advance's depth matches the total scout count.
Grid: Black terrain. Fortification intact. Right triangle filled from corner. Scout markers erased.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns): Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: Some colored cells moved? Let's map. Input colored cells: Y at (0,1) R at (0,6) R at (1,5) R at (2,4) R at (2,6) R at (3,7) Y at (4,3) G at (5,8) Output colored cells: R at (0,6) unchanged? Actually output row0 col6 is R same. R at (1,5) unchanged. R at (2,4) unchanged. R at (2,6) unchanged. R at (3,7) unchanged. Y at (4,8) new? output row4 col8 Y. Y at (5,7) Y, and (5,8) Y (two Y's). Input had Y at (0,1) and (4,3). G at (5,8) disappears. So Y's moved to bottom right corner region forming a right triangle? Let's see pattern: corner scout? The description: "one scout occupying a corner position." In input, which corner has a colored cell? In example1, corner positions: (0,0) top-left, (0,8) top-right, (5,0) bottom-left, (5,8) bottom-right. Input has G at (5,8) bottom-right corner. That's the corner scout. The fortress stands (maybe other colored cells remain). From corner scout's position, a triangular troop advance fans inward along both borders in the most common scout regiment's color. So we need to fill a right triangle from that corner along both borders (i.e., along bottom row and rightmost column) moving inward, using the most common color among the other colored cells? The "most common scout regiment's color" likely is the color that appears most frequently among the other colored cells (excluding corner). In example1, colors present: Y appears twice, R appears five times, G appears once (corner). Most common is R (5). But the triangle in output is filled with Y, not R. Wait triangle appears with Y's at bottom right region. Actually triangle of Y's appears at bottom right corner (rows 4-5, cols 7-8). That's Y color, which is not most common. Maybe the most common color among the scouts (excluding corner) is Y? Let's count: Y appears at (0,1) and (4,3) =2. R appears 5. So R is most common. Yet triangle uses Y. So maybe "most common scout regiment's color" refers to the color that appears most among the border? Or maybe the color of the corner scout? Corner is G, but triangle uses Y, not G. Hmm. Maybe the rule: Identify the color that appears exactly twice? Not. Let's examine shape: The triangle depth matches total scout count. Total scout count maybe number of colored cells? Input has total colored cells = 8 (Y2,R5,G1). Depth of triangle? In output, triangle of Y's occupies positions: (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a right triangle of size 2 (depth 2). Depth maybe equals number of corner scouts? Not. Depth maybe equals number of scouts of the most common color? Most common color R count =5, but depth 2 not 5 ... [9877 chars truncated]
"The set piece stands on a dark stage while actors wait in the wings, each in a different costume color. The stage manager in the corner calls places — a spotlight fans out from that corner in a triangular wash, glowing in the color worn by the largest costume group. The actors exit as the light takes their place."
120b: fail
See: A stage set and scattered costumed figures on a dark stage, one figure positioned in a corner.
Do: The set is untouched. A triangular spotlight expands from the corner along both stage edges, colored by the most popular costume. All actors vanish. The light's spread corresponds to the cast size.
Grid: Dark stage. Set piece preserved. Filled triangle from corner. Isolated colored cells removed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine. Example1 Input (6 rows, 9 columns): Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output (6x9): Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: The set piece preserved? In description: "set is untouched". Which cells are set? Possibly the R's? In output, many R's remain same positions as input? Let's compare. Input R positions: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7). Output R positions: same? Row0 col6 R stays. Row1 col5 R stays. Row2 col4 R stays, col6 R stays. Row3 col7 R stays. So all R unchanged. Other colors: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). In output, Y moved? Output Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). So Y's moved to bottom right triangle? The description: triangular spotlight expands from corner along both stage edges, colored by the most popular costume. All actors vanish. Light's spread corresponds to cast size. Isolated colored cells removed. Interpretation: Determine most frequent non-R color? In input, colors besides R: Y appears twice, G appears once. So most popular is Y. The triangle from a corner (which corner?) "one figure positioned in a corner." In input there is a figure in a corner? In example, maybe a colored cell at a corner? Input has no colored cell at corner (0,0) is ., (0,8) ., (5,0) ., (5,8) G at (5,8) bottom right corner? Actually row5 col8 is G (since 9 columns index 0-8). That's a corner? bottom right corner is (5,8) yes there is G. So corner figure is G (magenta? Actually G is green). So corner figure maybe defines corner of triangle? The triangle expands from that corner along both edges (i.e., along bottom row and rightmost column). The triangle is filled with the most popular costume color (Y). The original actors (non-set) vanish (i.e., other colors removed). The set piece preserved (maybe R's). So we need to fill a right triangle with Y, with legs along bottom row and rightmost column, starting from corner where G was? But output Y's are at positions (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's a small triangle of size 2? Let's compute cast size maybe number of non-R cells? Input non-R colored cells count: Y (2) + G (1) =3. So triangle size maybe based on count? The triangle area maybe equals number of colored cells? In output we have Y cells count: 3 (positions). Indeed triangle of size? Let's see shape: bottom row (row5) columns 7 and 8 have Y, and row4 col8 Y. That's a right triangle of leg length 2 (including corner?). Area (including corner?) For leg length n, number of cells in right triangle (including corner) = n*(n+1)/2. For n=2, that's 3 cells. So matches count 3. The corner is at (5,8) originally G, but in output that corner becomes Y? Actually output at (5,8) is Y, yes. So the triangle's right angle corner is at the original corner figure location (G). Th ... [11813 chars truncated]
"A topiary stands sculpted in the garden while seeds of various colors lie scattered on the dark soil. One seed has landed in the corner of the plot — it germinates into a spreading ground cover, a triangular patch creeping along both fences, blooming in the color of whichever seed variety was most numerous. The ungerminated seeds rot away."
120b: fail
See: A shaped hedge and loose colored seeds on dark earth, one seed nestled in a corner of the garden.
Do: The topiary remains. From the corner seed, a triangular ground cover grows along both boundaries, taking the dominant seed color. All other seeds disappear. The patch's extent reflects the total seed count.
Grid: Black soil. Topiary preserved. Right triangle of fill from corner spreading inward. Seed markers erased.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input grid (6 rows, 9 columns?). Let's write coordinates. Row0: . Y . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . Y . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . G Output grid same size 6x9. Output rows: Row0: . . . . . . R . . Row1: . . . . . R . . . Row2: . . . . R . R . . Row3: . . . . . . . R . Row4: . . . . . . . . Y Row5: . . . . . . . Y Y Observations: Original topiary? The "hedge" maybe shape of R's? In input there are R's forming some shape: positions: (0,6), (1,5), (2,4), (2,6), (3,7), maybe also? That's like a diagonal line? Let's map. Coordinates (row,col): (0,6) (1,5) (2,4) and (2,6) (3,7) (5,8) is G not R. So R's form a shape maybe like a "topiary" that remains unchanged in output. Indeed output retains same R positions unchanged. Other colored seeds: Y at (0,1) and (4,3). G at (5,8). In output, Y's moved? Output has Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). Actually output shows Y at (4,8) and (5,7) and (5,8). That's three Y's. Input had two Y's and one G. The rule says: "From the corner seed, a triangular ground cover grows along both boundaries, taking the dominant seed color. All other seeds disappear. The patch's extent reflects the total seed count." Interpretation: There is a "corner seed" meaning a colored cell located in a corner of the grid? In input, which corner? The bottom right corner? Actually there is G at (5,8) which is bottom right corner (since rows 0-5, cols 0-8). That's a seed in a corner. Its color is G (green). Dominant seed color? Among seeds (non-black, non-topiary?) maybe count colors: Y appears twice, G appears once. Dominant is Y (most frequent). So the triangular patch uses Y color. The patch extends as a right triangle from the corner seed along both boundaries (i.e., along bottom row and rightmost column) covering area equal to total seed count (maybe number of seeds total?). Total seeds count = number of colored cells other than topiary? Input seeds: Y (2), G (1) = 3 seeds. So triangle area (including corner?) maybe number of cells = 3? In output we see Y placed at (4,8), (5,7), (5,8). That's three cells forming a right triangle with right angle at bottom right corner (5,8). Indeed cells: corner (5,8) is Y now (was G). Then one cell left (5,7) and one cell up (4,8). That's a 2x2 right triangle of size 2 (leg length 2) containing 3 cells (including corner). So matches seed count 3. All other seeds disappear: original Y at (0,1) and (4,3) removed. G at corner replaced by Y. Thus rule: Identify the corner cell that is non-black and not part of the "hedge" (topiary). Determine the most frequent color among all such non-black cells (including corner). Then fill a right triangle of that color anchored at that corner, extending along the two edges (row and column) inward, with number of cells equal to total count of those cells (including corner). The triangle is right-angled with legs of le ... [9372 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 7×7 grid containing black (empty) cells and several different colors. One color appears far more frequently than all others — this is the dominant color. The remaining non-black colors (such as W, X, Y, O, A, M) each appear only once or twice, scattered throughout the grid as distractors.
Do: 1. Count the occurrences of each non-black color in the input grid. Identify the dominant color — the one that appears most frequently. 2. Map the dominant color to a fixed 3×3 output pattern using azure (A) on a black background: If the dominant color is R (red), output a horizontal line: row 1 = '. . .', row 2 = 'A A A', row 3 = '. . .'. If the dominant color is G (green), output an inverted-L shape: row 1 = '. A A', row 2 = '. A .', row 3 = '. A .'. If the dominant color is B (blue), output a mirrored shape: row 1 = '. . A', row 2 = 'A A .', row 3 = '. A .'. 3. Output the corresponding 3×3 pattern. The specific positions and arrangement of colors in the input grid do not matter — only which color is most frequent.
Grid: The input grid is always 7×7. The output grid is always 3×3. The output uses only two colors: black (.) for background and azure (A) for the pattern. The output pattern is entirely determined by which non-black color dominates the input grid, not by spatial arrangement.
"In a noisy room, the loudest voice shapes the echo on the wall."
120b: k=2
See: A crowded square buzzes with chatter. Most voices are faint — a whisper of maroon here, a murmur of orange there — but one color is practically shouting over everyone else, filling the room with its presence. The rest are just passersby.
Do: Listen to the crowd and find the voice that drowns out all others. That dominant voice doesn't just win the argument — it chooses a signature gesture, a pose struck in azure light on a small dark stage. Each color-voice has rehearsed its own distinctive pose: one stands bold as a horizon line, another rises like a bent elbow, another traces a zigzag path. The loudest voice steps onto the stage and strikes the only pose it knows.
Grid: The crowded square is always seven paces on each side. The stage where the winner performs is a tiny three-by-three platform, lit only in azure against darkness. No matter how chaotic the crowd, only one pose appears — chosen not by where anyone stood, but simply by who was loudest.
We need to infer rule. Input 7x7 grid, output 3x3 grid with only azure (A) and black (.) maybe? In examples output contains only '.' and 'A'. So rule: find dominant color (most frequent) in input, then output a specific pattern (pose) associated with that color, placed on 3x3 azure stage (i.e., azure cells are the pose? Actually output shows A where pose is, '.' elsewhere). So each color maps to a particular 3x3 pattern of A's (maybe shape). Need to deduce mapping from examples. Example1 input: Let's count frequencies of each color (excluding .). Input grid 7x7. I'll list rows: 1: B . B . O . . => B,B,O 2: B B W B . B . => B,B,W,B,B => B4,W1 3: . . B B . R . => B,B,R 4: . . . . G . B => G,B 5: . Y . B . . B => Y,B,B 6: . . B . R . A => B,R,A 7: . . B . O G B => B,O,G,B Now tally: B: count? Row1 2, row2 4, row3 2, row4 1, row5 2, row6 1, row7 3 = total 15? Let's sum: 2+4=6, +2=8, +1=9, +2=11, +1=12, +3=15. Yes B=15. O: row1 1, row7 1 =2. W:1 R: row3 1, row6 1 =2. G: row4 1, row7 1 =2. Y:1 A:1 Dominant is B (blue). Output pattern corresponds to blue's pose. Output grid (3x3): . . A A A . . A . Let's map coordinates (row,col) 0-index. Pattern of A's: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a shape maybe like a bent elbow? Let's note. Now Example2: Input grid. Rows: 1: . G . G X G . => G,G,X,G => G3, X1 2: . . G G . . . => G,G => G2 3: A . . . . . G => A,G => A1,G1 4: G Y G W G . G => G,Y,G,W,G,G => G4,Y1,W1 5: . . W G B G G => W,G,B,G,G => G3,W1,B1 6: . G G G . G . => G4,G? actually row6: . G G G . G . => G4? there are G at col1,2,3,5 => 4 G. 7: . . . . . . G => G1 Now tally: G: count rows: row1 3, row2 2 =>5, row3 1 =>6, row4 4 =>10, row5 3 =>13, row6 4 =>17, row7 1 =>18. So G=18. X:1 A:1 Y:1 W:2? row4 W1, row5 W1 =>2 B:1 Dominant G (green). Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . A's at (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a vertical line plus top right two? shape maybe "Z"? Not. Now we need mapping for each possible dominant color to a pattern. We have only two examples: blue -> pattern1, green -> pattern2. Need to infer pattern for test input where dominant color maybe something else. Let's compute frequencies for test input. Test Input rows: 1: G . G . . . G => G,G,G => 3 G 2: G . W X . . X => G,W,X,X => G1,W1,X2 3: . G . G . R W => G,G,R,W => G2,R1,W1 4: A G . G . . O => A,G,G,O => A1,G2,O1 5: . G X . . G G => G,X,G,G => G3,X1 6: . . G G . . . => G,G => G2 7: . . G . Y . . => G,Y => G1,Y1 Now tally each color: G: row1 3, row2 1 =>4, row3 2 =>6, row4 2 =>8, row5 3 =>11, row6 2 =>13, row7 1 =>14. So G=14. W: row2 1, row3 1 =>2. X: row2 2, row5 1 =>3. R:1 A:1 O:1 Y:1 Dominant is G (green) again, same as example2. So output should be the pattern associated with green. Thus output should be same as example2 output: pattern for green. Pattern from example2: Row0: ... [343 chars truncated]
"In a petri dish teeming with competing colonies, the species that outgrows all others leaves its signature protein folded in a characteristic shape — not where it grew, but how it marks its territory."
120b: k=2
See: A crowded culture plate where several species of microorganism vie for resources. One species vastly outnumbers the rest, while rare mutant strains appear as isolated specimens.
Do: Identify which colony has achieved dominance through sheer population. Each dominant species, when it wins, expresses a unique molecular signature — a small, fixed fold pattern. Read off the winning species' signature.
Grid: The petri dish is a 7×7 field. The diagnostic result is always a 3×3 protein fold rendered in azure against a dark background.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 inputs, output 3x3 azure (A) pattern on black background (.). In examples, output shows A's forming some shape. Need to find which species dominates (most frequent color) and then output its "signature" pattern. Let's analyze Example1. First, count frequencies of each color in input. Let's list colors: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, etc. Need to find which is most numerous. Let's approximate. Example1 grid 7x7: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count each non-'.' maybe? Let's count B: Row1: positions 1,3 =>2. Row2: 1,2,4,6 =>4 (plus maybe others) total 6. Row3: col3,4 =>2 =>8. Row4: col7 =>1 =>9. Row5: col4,7 =>2 =>11. Row6: col3,7? row6 col3 B, col7 A not B. So +1 =>12. Row7: col3,7 =>2 =>14. So B count 14. Other colors: O appears row1 col5, row7 col5 =>2. W row2 col3 =>1. R row3 col6, row6 col5 =>2. G row4 col5, row7 col6 =>2. Y row5 col2 =>1. A row6 col7 =>1. '.' are rest. Thus B is dominant (most numerous). Output pattern uses A's (azure) shape. So signature of B is some fixed 3x3 pattern. Let's see output: Output grid (3x3): Row1: . . A Row2: A A . Row3: . A . Represent as coordinates (row,col) with A's at (1,3), (2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's shape like a small "L" rotated? Let's map. Now Example2: Need to find dominant color. Example2 input rows: Row1: . G . G X G . Row2: . . G G . . . Row3: A . . . . . G Row4: G Y G W G . G Row5: . . W G B G G Row6: . G G G . G . Row7: . . . . . . G Count each color: G many. Let's count quickly. Row1: G at col2,4,6 =>3 Row2: G at col3,4 =>2 total5 Row3: G at col7 =>1 total6; A at col1 (but A is azure, maybe not dominant) Row4: G at col1,3,5,7 =>4 total10; Y at col2, W at col4 Row5: G at col4,6,7 =>3 total13; W at col3, B at col5 Row6: G at col2,3,4,6 =>4 total17 Row7: G at col7 =>1 total18 So G count 18, others less. So dominant is G (green). Output pattern again same? Output: Row1: . A A Row2: . A . Row3: . A . A's at (1,2),(1,3),(2,2),(3,2). That's shape like a T? Actually coordinates: top row two A's, middle column A's down. Compare with previous pattern for B: A's at (1,3),(2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's different orientation. Thus each dominant species maps to a specific 3x3 pattern (signature). Need to deduce mapping from color to pattern. Possibly pattern corresponds to shape of that color's distribution? Maybe we need to extract a 3x3 subgrid that is most dense of that color? Or maybe we need to find the "minority" pattern? Let's examine pattern for B: shape maybe resembles letter "B"? Not. Let's visualize B pattern: coordinates (row,col) with A's: [ (0,2), (1,0), (1,1), (2,1) ] using 0-index. That's like a small shape of a "corner" with extra top right. For G pattern: A's at (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a vertical line of three with top row extra right cell, forming a "T" shap ... [9422 chars truncated]
"A crowded star field is surveyed, and the most abundant spectral class determines which constellation template is projected onto the observatory dome."
120b: k=2
See: A dense star field with stars of various spectral types. One class of star vastly outnumbers the rest, which appear as rare scattered points.
Do: Classify the stars and determine which spectral type dominates. Each dominant class triggers a specific constellation projection — a fixed pattern. Display it on the dome.
Grid: The star field is 7×7. The constellation projection is 3×3, illuminated in azure on the dark dome.
We need to infer rule. Input 7x7, output 3x3 azure pattern (A) placed based on dominant class? Let's examine examples. Example1 input 7x7 with many B (blue) maybe dominant. Output 3x3 pattern with A (azure) in certain shape. Let's map positions. Example1 output grid (3x3): row0: . . A row1: A A . row2: . A . Coordinates (r,c) zero-index: (0,2)=A (1,0)=A (1,1)=A (2,1)=A That's like a T shape? Actually shape looks like a rotated? Visual: ..A AA. .A. That's like a small arrow pointing up? Let's see example2 output: Example2 output: row0: . A A row1: . A . row2: . A . Coordinates: (0,1)=A (0,2)=A (1,1)=A (2,1)=A That's shape like a vertical line with a top right extra? Actually shape: column 1 all three rows A, plus top row column2 A. So shape like a T rotated? Not same as example1. So rule depends on dominant class maybe different pattern per dominant color. We need to identify which color dominates in each input. Example1 count colors: Let's approximate. Input grid lines: Row0: B . B . O . . => B count 2, O 1 Row1: B B W B . B . => B 4, W1 Row2: . . B B . R . => B2, R1 Row3: . . . . G . B => G1, B1 Row4: . Y . B . . B => Y1, B2 Row5: . . B . R . A => B1, R1, A1 Row6: . . B . O G B => B2, O1, G1 Total B: 2+4+2+1+2+1+2 =14? Let's sum: row0 2, row1 4 =>6, row2 2 =>8, row3 1 =>9, row4 2 =>11, row5 1 =>12, row6 2 =>14. Others: O 2, W1, R2, G2, Y1, A1. So B dominates. Output pattern for B-dominant is shape1 (..A / AA. /.A.) Example2 input: count colors. Rows: 0: . G . G X G . => G3, X1 1: . . G G . . . => G2 2: A . . . . . G => A1, G1 3: G Y G W G . G => G4, Y1, W1 4: . . W G B G G => W1, G3, B1 5: . G G G . G . => G4 6: . . . . . . G => G1 Total G: row0 3, row1 2 =>5, row2 1 =>6, row3 4 =>10, row4 3 =>13, row5 4 =>17, row6 1 =>18. Others: X1, A1, Y1, W2, B1. So G dominates. Output pattern for G-dominant is shape2 ( . A A / . A . / . A .) Thus rule: Identify most frequent color (excluding . maybe). Then output a 3x3 pattern of azure (A) shaped according to that dominant color's identity (maybe each color maps to a specific pattern). Need mapping for B and G only known. Need to infer pattern for other possible dominant colors? Test input likely has a dominant color maybe something else. Let's count test input. Test Input rows: Row0: G . G . . . G => G3 Row1: G . W X . . X => G1, W1, X2 Row2: . G . G . R W => G2, R1, W1 Row3: A G . G . . O => A1, G2, O1 Row4: . G X . . G G => G3, X1 Row5: . . G G . . . => G2 Row6: . . G . Y . . => G1, Y1 Now sum G: row0 3, row1 1 =>4, row2 2 =>6, row3 2 =>8, row4 3 =>11, row5 2 =>13, row6 1 =>14. Total G=14. Other colors counts: W: row1 1, row2 1 =>2 X: row1 2, row4 1 =>3 R:1 A:1 O:1 Y:1 So G dominates again (14 vs next X 3). So dominant is G, same as example2. Therefore output pattern should be same as for G-dominant: shape2. Thus output 3x3 grid with azure A in positions: (0 ... [194 chars truncated]
"A harbor crowded with ships flying many flags — the fleet with the greatest number of vessels gets its ensign woven into the harbormaster's signal pennant."
120b: k=3
See: A busy harbor where ships fly flags of many nations. One fleet vastly outnumbers the others, while a few foreign vessels dot the anchorage.
Do: Survey the harbor and identify the dominant fleet by flag count. Each fleet has a unique signal pennant pattern. The harbormaster hoists that pennant.
Grid: The harbor is 7×7. The signal pennant is 3×3, stitched in azure on a dark field.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 input, output is 3x3. The description: identify dominant fleet by flag count, each fleet has unique signal pennant pattern, the harbormaster hoists that pennant. So we need to find which color appears most (dominant fleet) and then output a 3x3 pattern (pennant) that is associated with that color? The output grid contains azure (A) and maybe other colors? In examples output contains only '.' and 'A' (azure) maybe also other? Let's examine. Example1 output: . . A A A . . A . That's 3x3 with A and '.'. Example2 output: . A A . A . . A . Again only A and '.'. Example3 output: . . . A A A . . . Only A and '.'. So output is a 3x3 pattern of azure (A) placed according to something. The description: "signal pennant is 3×3, stitched in azure on a dark field." So azure (A) on black (.) background. So we need to produce a 3x3 pattern that corresponds to the dominant fleet's unique pennant pattern. So each color (fleet) has a specific pattern of A's within 3x3. We need to deduce mapping from examples. We have to find which color is dominant in each input, then see output pattern to map color to pattern. Example1 input: Let's count each color frequency. I'll list grid 7x7: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count: B: many. Let's count: Row1 col1 B, col3 B =>2. Row2 col1 B, col2 B, col4 B, col6 B =>4 more total6. Row3 col3 B, col4 B =>2 total8. Row4 col7 B =>1 total9. Row5 col4 B, col7 B =>2 total11. Row6 col3 B =>1 total12. Row7 col3 B, col7 B =>2 total14. So B=14. Other colors: O appears row1 col5, row7 col5 =>2. W row2 col3 =>1. R row3 col6, row6 col5 =>2. G row4 col5, row7 col6 =>2. Y row5 col2 =>1. A row6 col7 =>1. . (black) many. Dominant is B (blue). So pattern corresponds to blue fleet. Output pattern for example1: . . A A A . . A . Let's note positions of A (1-indexed rows, cols): (1,3), (2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's shape like a small L? Visual: Row1: ..A Row2: AA. Row3: .A. That's like a rotated 'Z' maybe? Let's keep. Example2 input: Count colors. Rows: Row1: . G . G X G . Row2: . . G G . . . Row3: A . . . . . G Row4: G Y G W G . G Row5: . . W G B G G Row6: . G G G . G . Row7: . . . . . . G Count each non-black: G: many. Let's count: Row1 col2, col4, col6 =>3. Row2 col3, col4 =>2 total5. Row3 col7 =>1 total6. Row4 col1, col3, col5, col7 =>4 total10. Row5 col4, col6, col7 =>3 total13. Row6 col2, col3, col4, col6 =>4 total17. Row7 col7 =>1 total18. So G=18. Other colors: X row1 col5 =>1. A row3 col1 =>1. Y row4 col2 =>1. W row4 col4 and row5 col3 =>2. B row5 col5 =>1. Dominant is G (green). Output pattern for example2: . A A . A . . A . Positions of A: (1,2),(1,3),(2,2),(3,2). That's shape like a vertical line plus top right two? Actually pattern: Row1: .AA Row2: .A. Row3: .A. So shape like a T rotated? Not exact ... [4584 chars truncated]
"A circuit board buzzes with signals on many frequencies, but the dominant frequency triggers a specific LED pattern on the diagnostic display."
120b: k=4
See: A noisy circuit board carrying signals across many frequency bands. One frequency appears on far more traces than the others, which register as faint noise.
Do: Analyze the signal spectrum and identify the dominant frequency. Each frequency is mapped to a unique diagnostic LED pattern — a fixed indicator shape. Light up that pattern.
Grid: The circuit board is 7×7. The diagnostic display is 3×3, lit in azure on a dark panel.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 input, output 3x3 azure pattern (A) on black background. The description: dominant frequency appears on far more traces than others, faint noise. So we need to find most frequent color (excluding maybe something) and map to pattern shape. The output shows A's placed in certain shape. Let's analyze examples. Example1 input 7x7. Let's count frequencies. Colors present: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, M? Actually M not present. Let's count occurrences quickly? Might be heavy. But maybe dominant color is B (blue) appears many times. Output pattern: shape? Output grid: . . A A A . . A . So azure A's positions: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a T rotated? Let's map coordinates (row,col). Pattern looks like a "Z"? Actually shape: three in a diagonal? Let's draw: Row0: ..A Row1: AA. Row2: .A. Coordinates: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a small L shape plus extra? Visual: looks like a "corner" shape maybe representing the dominant color's shape? Let's see Example2 output: . A A . A . . A . Positions: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a vertical line of three with a top right extra? Actually shape: column 1 rows0-2 all A, plus (0,2). So like a T rotated? Example3 output: . . . A A A . . . Positions: row1 all three A. That's a horizontal line of three. Example4 output same as example3: horizontal line row1 all three. So pattern varies based on something. Maybe the dominant color frequency determines which shape (one of four possible patterns). Need to map dominant color to shape. Let's identify dominant color in each example. Example3 input: Let's count quickly. Grid: Row0: . . R . B X G Row1: . . R W . R . Row2: R R R Y R . . Row3: . R . R O R . Row4: R R . . R R M Row5: . R R . R . . Row6: X . Y R . R R Count R (red) appears many times. Likely dominant. Output pattern is horizontal line (row1 all A). So for dominant red, pattern = horizontal line. Example4 input: Let's count. Grid: R . . R R . X . R R . . . R . B . . . . . . . . . R . W . W . . . . R . . R B . . A R . . R R . . Count R appears many: positions many. Also maybe other colors but R likely dominant. Output same horizontal line. So red dominant => horizontal line. Example2 input: Let's count colors. Grid: . G . G X G . . . G G . . . A . . . . . G G Y G W G . G . . W G B G G . G G G . G . . . . . . . G Count G (green) appears many. Also maybe G is dominant. Output pattern is vertical line with extra top right (positions (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1)). That's like a T shape? Actually vertical line of three at column1 rows0-2, plus extra at (0,2). That's like a "┤" shape? Could correspond to green. Example1 input: Count B (blue) appears many. Output pattern is shape with three A's? Let's see pattern: positions (0,2),(1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a rotated T? Visual: looks like a "└" shape? Actually shape: row1 has two A at cols0,1; column1 has A at rows1,2; plus top right at (0,2). That's like a shape maybe representing blue. So we have ... [2434 chars truncated]
"Many minor spirits haunt a sacred grove, but the one whose presence is felt most strongly leaves its unique rune glowing on the altar stone."
120b: k=3
See: A sacred grove alive with many spiritual presences. One spirit manifests far more intensely than the others, whose traces are faint and scattered.
Do: Sense which spirit dominates the grove. Each spirit, when it prevails, inscribes its personal rune on the altar — a compact, fixed glyph. Read the glowing rune.
Grid: The grove is 7×7. The altar rune is 3×3, glowing azure on dark stone.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 inputs, output 3x3. The description: "sacred grove alive with many spiritual presences. One spirit manifests far more intensely than the others, whose traces are faint and scattered. Sense which spirit dominates the grove. Each spirit, when it prevails, inscribes its personal rune on the altar — a compact, fixed glyph. Read the glowing rune. Grid details: The grove is 7×7. The altar rune is 3×3, glowing azure on dark stone." So we need to find which color (spirit) is most frequent? Then output a 3x3 pattern corresponding to that spirit's "personal rune". The rune is fixed per spirit, maybe predetermined mapping from color to 3x3 pattern of A (azure) and . (black). In outputs we see only '.' and 'A' characters. So rune is pattern of azure (A) on black background. So each dominant color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern of A's. We need to deduce mapping from examples. Example1 input: we need to count frequencies of each color (excluding .?). Let's count quickly. Input1 grid 7x7: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count each color: B: let's count. Row1: positions 1,3 =>2. Row2: 1,2,4,6 =>4 (total6). Row3: 3,4 =>2 (8). Row4: 7 =>1 (9). Row5: 4,7 =>2 (11). Row6: 3 =>1 (12). Row7: 3,7 =>2 (14). So B=14. O: row1 col5, row7 col5 =>2. W: row2 col3 =>1. R: row3 col6, row6 col5 =>2. G: row4 col5, row7 col6 =>2. Y: row5 col2 =>1. A: row6 col7 =>1. So dominant is B (blue) with 14. Output pattern: . . A A A . . A . Let's denote pattern for B = that. Example2: Input2 grid: Row1: . G . G X G . Row2: . . G G . . . Row3: A . . . . . G Row4: G Y G W G . G Row5: . . W G B G G Row6: . G G G . G . Row7: . . . . . . G Count colors: G: many. Let's count. Row1: positions2,4,6 =>3 Row2: 3,4 =>2 (5) Row3: col7 =>1 (6) Row4: col1,3,5,7 =>4 (10) Row5: col4,6,7 =>3 (13) Row6: col2,3,4,6 =>4 (17) Row7: col7 =>1 (18) So G=18. Other colors: X row1 col5 =>1. A row3 col1 =>1. Y row4 col2 =>1. W row4 col4 =>1. B row5 col5 =>1. So dominant G (green). Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . So pattern for G is that. Example3: Input3 grid: Row1: . . R . B X G Row2: . . R W . R . Row3: R R R Y R . . Row4: . R . R O R . Row5: R R . . R R M Row6: . R R . R . . Row7: X . Y R . R R Count colors: R: many. Count. Row1 col3,5? Actually row1 col3=R, col5=B, col7=G. So R count row1:1. Row2: col3=R, col4=W, col6=R =>2 (total3) Row3: col1,2,3,5 = R,R,R,R =>4 (7) Row4: col2=R, col4=R, col6=R =>3 (10) Row5: col1=R, col2=R, col5=R, col6=R =>4 (14) Row6: col2=R, col3=R, col5=R =>3 (17) Row7: col4=R, col6=R, col7=R =>3 (20) So R=20. Other colors: B row1 col5=1. X row1 col6=1, row7 col1=1 =>2. W row2 col4=1. Y row3 col4=1, row7 col3=1 =>2. M row5 col7=1. Dominant R (red). Output pattern: . . . A A A . . . So pattern for ... [1552 chars truncated]
"A crowded dance floor where many styles collide — whichever style claims the most dancers gets its signature formation frozen in the spotlight."
120b: k=5
See: A vibrant dance floor with dancers performing in many different styles. One style clearly dominates by sheer numbers, while a few solo performers represent other traditions.
Do: Watch the floor and identify the dominant dance style. Each style, when it takes over, resolves into a characteristic formation — a compact arrangement. Capture that formation in the spotlight.
Grid: The dance floor is 7×7. The spotlight formation is 3×3, illuminated in azure on a dark stage.
We need to infer rule. From examples, output is 3x3 azure (A) pattern placed on black background (.) . The pattern seems to be a compact arrangement of A's corresponding to dominant color region in input? Let's analyze. Example1 input 7x7. Need to find dominant style (most frequent color?). Count? Let's approximate. Colors: B many, also others. Likely B is dominant. Output shows A's forming shape maybe representing B's compact arrangement? Output pattern: row1: . . A row2: A A . row3: . A . That's a plus shape missing top-left? Actually shape: coordinates (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a small L shape? Let's map: positions of A's maybe correspond to positions of B's that are isolated? Not sure. Example2 output same pattern? Output: . A A . A . . A . Positions: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a T shape? Actually shape: column at col1 rows0-2, plus extra at (0,2). Different. Example3 output: . . . A A A . . . That's a horizontal line of three A's in middle row. Example4 output same as example3: horizontal line. Example5 output: . A A . A . . A . That's same as example2. So output varies based on input. We need to deduce mapping: maybe find the minority color (least frequent) and output its shape? Let's test. Example3 input: many R's? Count: appears many R. Also other colors. The output is horizontal line of A's. Maybe the minority color forms that shape? Let's see minority maybe X? Not sure. Look at example3 input grid: I'll note positions of X (grey) at (0,5) and (5,0?) Actually row0 col5 X, row5 col0 X, row6 col0 X? row6 col0 X. That's three X's not forming line. Output is line of three A's horizontally. Not matching. Maybe rule: find the color that forms a contiguous region of size 3 (or shape) and output that shape as A's. The dominant color region is large; we need to extract its "compact arrangement" meaning the minimal bounding box of the most frequent color? For example3, most frequent color maybe R. Let's see R positions: many, seems many scattered but maybe they form a plus shape? Let's examine quickly: rows with many R's. Row0: positions 2? Actually row0: ". . R . B X G" => R at col2. Row1: ". . R W . R ." => R at col2 and col5. Row2: "R R R Y R . ." => R at col0,1,2,4. Row3: ". R . R O R ." => R at col1,3,5. Row4: "R R . . R R M" => R at col0,1,4,5. Row5: ". R R . R . ." => R at col1,2,4. Row6: "X . Y R . R R" => R at col3,5,6. So many R's, not a compact shape. Maybe we need to find the color that is NOT dominant but appears in a compact arrangement (like a 3x3 pattern) and then output that arrangement as A's. For example3, maybe the compact arrangement is the three R's in row2 columns0-2 (a horizontal line of three). That's exactly the output shape (horizontal line). Indeed row2 has "R R R". That's three consecutive R's horizontally. That's a compact arrangement of the dominant color? Actually R is dominant, but the compact arrangement is a line of three R's somewhere. Output replicates that shape ... [11043 chars truncated]
"A core sample reveals many minerals, but the one that saturates the rock determines which crystal habit is etched into the field notebook."
120b: k=2
See: A geological cross-section showing many mineral types embedded in rock. One mineral is pervasive throughout the sample, while others appear as rare inclusions.
Do: Examine the sample and identify the dominant mineral by abundance. Each mineral, when dominant, produces a characteristic crystal habit — a fixed geometric form. Sketch it in the notebook.
Grid: The core sample is 7×7. The crystal habit sketch is 3×3, drawn in azure on a dark page.
We need to infer rule. Input 7x7, output 3x3. The description: identify dominant mineral (most frequent color) in the 7x7. Then produce a fixed geometric form (crystal habit) drawn in azure (A) on dark page (black .). So output is 3x3 pattern of A's and . representing shape of dominant color's habit. Thus need to see examples: Example1 input, find most frequent color. Let's count quickly. Input1 grid 7x7: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count each non-.: B appears many. Let's count B: Row1 col1,3 =2. Row2 col1,2,4,6 =4 (total6). Row3 col3,4 =2 (8). Row4 col7 =1 (9). Row5 col4,7 =2 (11). Row6 col3 =1 (12). Row7 col3,7 =2 (14). Also maybe others B? Row5 col? that's it. So B=14. Other colors: O appears row1 col5, row7 col5 =2. W row2 col3 =1. R row3 col6, row6 col5 =2. G row4 col5, row7 col6 =2. Y row5 col2 =1. A row6 col7 =1. So dominant is B. Now output pattern (3x3) with A's shape representing B's habit. Output grid: . . A A A . . A . Let's map coordinates (row, col) 1-3. Pattern of A's: positions (1,3), (2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's like a shape maybe like a "Z" rotated? Let's visualize: Row1: ..A Row2: AA. Row3: .A. That's like a diagonal line from top right to bottom left with a block at middle left? Actually shape looks like a "L" rotated? Let's think of possible crystal habit shapes for each dominant color maybe predetermined mapping: each color corresponds to a specific 3x3 pattern of A's. Need to deduce mapping from Example2. Example2 input: Let's count frequencies. Grid 7x7: Row1: . G . G X G . Row2: . . G G . . . Row3: A . . . . . G Row4: G Y G W G . G Row5: . . W G B G G Row6: . G G G . G . Row7: . . . . . . G Count each color: G: many. Let's count: Row1 col2,4,6 =3. Row2 col3,4 =2 (5). Row3 col7 =1 (6). Row4 col1,3,5,7 =4 (10). Row5 col4,6,7 =3 (13). Row6 col2,3,4,6 =4 (17). Row7 col7 =1 (18). So G=18. Other colors: X row1 col5 =1. A row3 col1 =1. Y row4 col2 =1. W row4 col4 and row5 col3 =2. B row5 col5 =1. Others none. Dominant is G. Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . Positions of A: (1,2),(1,3),(2,2),(3,2). That's shape: a vertical line of three A's in column2, plus an extra A at top row column3. So like a T missing right side? Actually shape looks like a "┤" rotated? Let's list coordinates: (row, col) (1,2) (1,3) (2,2) (3,2) So shape is like a 2x2 block missing bottom right, plus an extra below column2. That's like a "L" shape with extra top right. Now compare to first shape: (1,3),(2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's like a rotated version maybe of same shape? Let's see if shape corresponds to dominant color's "crystal habit" maybe predetermined per color: B shape vs G shape. We need to find mapping for each possible dominant color (maybe 7 colors). We have only two examples: B and G. Need to deduce shape for other colors? For test input, we need to find dominant mineral in test grid, then output corresponding sh ... [1067 chars truncated]
"A chef tastes a complex stew and names the ingredient that overpowers everything else — each overpowering flavor gets plated in its own distinctive garnish pattern."
120b: k=2
See: A bubbling pot with many ingredients, but one flavor dominates the broth. Other seasonings — a pinch here, a dash there — are barely noticeable by comparison.
Do: Taste the stew and identify the overwhelming ingredient. Each dominant flavor has a traditional plating style — a specific arrangement of garnish on a small square plate. Present the garnish that corresponds to whatever took over the dish.
Grid: The stew pot is a 7×7 arrangement of ingredients. The plate is always 3×3, garnished in azure on a clean dark surface.
We need to infer rule. Input 7x7, output 3x3 with azure (A) placements on black background (.)? In examples output contains '.' and 'A' only. So rule: find dominant color in input (most frequent non-black?) Then output pattern corresponding to that color's "traditional plating style". Need to map each possible dominant color to a 3x3 pattern of A's. From example1: Input grid colors: let's count frequencies. Colors present: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A. Need most frequent. Let's approximate. Count B many. Likely B is dominant. Output pattern: . . A A A . . A . Positions of A: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's shape maybe like a T? Let's map coordinates (row,col). Pattern: row0: ..A row1: AA. row2: .A. That's like a small L rotated? Actually shape resembles a "Z"? Not sure. Example2: Input colors: many G (green). Likely G dominant. Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . Positions: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a vertical line with a top right extra. shape maybe like a "Γ"? Not. We need mapping: dominant color B -> pattern1, G -> pattern2. Need to predict for test input: find dominant color. Let's count frequencies quickly. Test input 7x7: Row0: G . G . . . G => G at col0,2,6 => 3 G Row1: G . W X . . X => G at0, W at2, X at3, X at6 => G+1, W+1, X+2 Row2: . G . G . R W => G at1,3 =>2 G, R at5, W at6 Row3: A G . G . . O => A at0, G at1,3 =>2 G, O at6 Row4: . G X . . G G => G at1,5,6 =>3 G, X at2 Row5: . . G G . . . => G at2,3 =>2 G Row6: . . G . Y . . => G at2, Y at4 Now tally counts: G: row0 3, row1 1, row2 2, row3 2, row4 3, row5 2, row6 1 = total 14? Let's sum: 3+1=4, +2=6, +2=8, +3=11, +2=13, +1=14. Yes G=14. W: row1 1, row2 1 =2 X: row1 2, row4 1 =3 A:1 R:1 O:1 Y:1 B:0 M:0 etc. So dominant is G (green) with 14, next X 3. So dominant color G. Thus output pattern should be same as example2 (dominant G). So output 3x3 pattern: From example2 output: . A A . A . . A . Let's verify pattern orientation maybe consistent. So answer grid: Row0: . A A Row1: . A . Row2: . A . Thus produce. Check if any other nuance: maybe pattern depends on which color dominates, but we only have two examples. Could be mapping: B -> pattern1, G -> pattern2. So we output pattern2. Thus final answer.
"An orchestra warms up in cacophony, but one section drowns out the rest — and the conductor's baton traces a gesture unique to that section's instrument family."
120b: k=4
See: A chaotic warm-up where many instruments play simultaneously. One instrumental section is far louder and more numerous than the scattered soloists from other sections.
Do: Listen for which section dominates the soundscape. The conductor responds with a specific baton gesture — a compact motion pattern unique to that instrument family. Transcribe the gesture.
Grid: The orchestra pit is 7×7. The conductor's gesture is a 3×3 notation in azure on silence.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 inputs, output is 3x3 with azure (A) and black (.) only. The description: "instrumental sections" maybe colors represent sections. One section dominates (most numerous). Conductor responds with a specific baton gesture — a compact motion pattern unique to that instrument family. So output pattern corresponds to dominant color's "gesture". Need to map dominant color to a 3x3 pattern of A and . (azure on silence). Look at examples. Example1 input: need to count colors? Let's tally quickly. Grid 7x7. Colors: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, M? Let's count occurrences of each non-blank? Actually '.' is black. Count each color frequency. I'll approximate: Write rows: 1: B . B . O . . => B:2, O:1 2: B B W B . B . => B:4, W:1 3: . . B B . R . => B:2, R:1 4: . . . . G . B => G:1, B:1 5: . Y . B . . B => Y:1, B:2 6: . . B . R . A => B:1, R:1, A:1 7: . . B . O G B => B:2, O:1, G:1 Total B count: sum: row1 2, row2 4, row3 2, row4 1, row5 2, row6 1, row7 2 =14. Others: O:2, W:1, R:2, G:2, Y:1, A:1. So dominant is B (blue). Output pattern: . . A A A . . A . So pattern for blue is that 3x3 arrangement. Example2: Input rows: 1: . G . G X G . => G:3, X:1 2: . . G G . . . => G:2 3: A . . . . . G => A:1, G:1 4: G Y G W G . G => G:4, Y:1, W:1 5: . . W G B G G => W:1, G:3, B:1 6: . G G G . G . => G:4 7: . . . . . . G => G:1 Count G: sum rows: 3+2+1+4+3+4+1 =18. Others: X1, A1, Y1, W2, B1. Dominant G (green). Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . So pattern for green is that. Example3: Input rows: 1: . . R . B X G => R1, B1, X1, G1 2: . . R W . R . => R2, W1 3: R R R Y R . . => R5, Y1 4: . R . R O R . => R3, O1 5: R R . . R R M => R5, M1 6: . R R . R . . => R3 7: X . Y R . R R => X1, Y1, R4 Count R: row1 1, row2 2, row3 5, row4 3, row5 5, row6 3, row7 4 =23. Others: B1, G1, X2, W1, Y2, O1, M1. Dominant red. Output pattern: . . . A A A . . . So pattern for red is that. Example4: Input rows: 1: R . . R R . X => R3, X1 2: . R R . . . R => R3 3: . B . . . . . => B1 4: . . . . R . W => R1, W1 5: . W . . . . R => W1, R1 6: . . R B . . A => R1, B1, A1 7: R . . R R . . => R3 Count R: row1 3, row2 3, row4 1, row5 1, row6 1, row7 3 =12. Others: X1, B2, W2, A1. Dominant red again. Output same as example3: . . . / A A A / . . . . Yes matches. Thus rule: Identify most frequent non-black color (excluding '.'), then output a fixed 3x3 pattern associated with that color. Need mapping for colors: Blue -> pattern1, Green -> pattern2, Red -> pattern3. Need to see if other colors appear in training? Not yet. So we need to infer pattern for each dominant color. Let's write patterns: Blue (B): Row1: . . A Row2: A A . Row3: . A . Green (G): Row1: . A A Row2: . A . Row3: . A . Red (R): Row1: . . . Row2: A A A Row3: . . . Thus patterns correspond maybe to shape of instrument family? But we just need for test input. Test input grid: Rows: 1: G . ... [937 chars truncated]
"On a field where players from many teams have wandered in, the team with the most jerseys gets to raise their unique pennant on the scoreboard."
120b: k=3
See: A chaotic scrimmage field with athletes in various team colors. One team's jersey color appears far more often than any other. A few lone players from other teams are scattered about.
Do: Count the jerseys and identify the team with the largest presence. Each team has a signature pennant shape. Hoist the winning team's pennant on the scoreboard.
Grid: The playing field is 7×7. The scoreboard pennant is 3×3, displayed in azure against a dark board.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input 7x7, output 3x3 with azure (A) placed where? In examples output contains A and . only. So rule: find most frequent color (excluding maybe something) and then output a 3x3 pattern of that color's "pennant shape"? Let's examine. Example1 input: count colors. Let's tally quickly. Grid 7x7. Row1: B . B . O . . => B2, O1 Row2: B B W B . B . => B4, W1 Row3: . . B B . R . => B2, R1 Row4: . . . . G . B => G1, B1 Row5: . Y . B . . B => Y1, B2 Row6: . . B . R . A => B1, R1, A1 Row7: . . B . O G B => B2, O1, G1 Total counts: B: let's sum: row1 2, row2 4, row3 2, row4 1, row5 2, row6 1, row7 2 =14. O: row1 1, row7 1 =2. W:1. R: row3 1, row6 1 =2. G: row4 1, row7 1 =2. Y:1. A:1. Most frequent is B (blue). Output shows A's placed where? Output 3x3: . . A A A . . A . Positions of A correspond to shape? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index within 3x3. Rows: 0: . . A => (0,2) 1: A A . => (1,0),(1,1) 2: . A . => (2,1) That's like a "pennant" shape maybe like a rotated L? Could be shape of most frequent color's cluster? Let's see where B's are in input maybe there is a 3x3 region where B's pattern matches? Look for a 3x3 window where B's are present in those positions? Let's scan quickly: maybe the shape corresponds to positions of B relative to something else? Another thought: The output is azure (A) placed at positions where the most frequent color (B) appears in the input's 3x3 region that is most dense? But output only 3x3, not location-specific. Maybe rule: Identify the color that appears most (dominant). Then output a 3x3 pattern that is the shape of that color's "signature pennant" which is predetermined: maybe each color has a specific 3x3 pattern, but only azure appears in output. So we always output azure pattern representing the dominant color. So we need to know which pattern corresponds to which dominant color? In examples, dominant colors: Example1 dominant B -> output pattern as shown. Example2: Let's count. Example2 input rows: Row1: . G . G X G . => G3, X1 Row2: . . G G . . . => G2 Row3: A . . . . . G => A1, G1 Row4: G Y G W G . G => G4, Y1, W1 Row5: . . W G B G G => W1, G3, B1 Row6: . G G G . G . => G4 Row7: . . . . . . G => G1 Total G count: row1 3, row2 2, row3 1, row4 4, row5 3, row6 4, row7 1 =18. Others: X1, A1, Y1, W2 (row4,5), B1. So dominant is G (green). Output pattern: . A A . A . . A . Positions: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a T shape? Actually shape: column 1 full, plus top row right two cells. That's like a "pennant" maybe representing green? Let's compare with example1 pattern: . . A / A A . / . A . That's like a rotated shape maybe representing blue. Example3: Count colors. Rows: 1: . . R . B X G => R1, B1, X1, G1 2: . . R W . R . => R2, W1 3: R R R Y R . . => R4, Y1 4: . R . R O R . => R3, O1 5: R R . . R R M => R5, M1 6: . R R . R . . => R3 7: X . Y R . R R => X1, Y1, R3 Total R count: ... [3939 chars truncated]
"A weather map swirls with many fronts, but one air mass dominates the region — and the forecast icon it produces on the bulletin board is uniquely its own."
120b: k=5
See: A satellite view shows a region with many competing weather systems. One type of front covers far more area than the scattered pockets of other conditions.
Do: Read the dominant weather pattern across the map. Each type of dominant front produces a characteristic forecast symbol — a compact icon. Display that icon on the forecast board.
Grid: The weather map spans a 7×7 region. The forecast icon is a 3×3 symbol rendered in azure on a dark bulletin board.
We need to infer rule. Input 7x7, output 3x3 with azure (A) pattern based on dominant color in input. In examples, output shows A's in certain positions forming shape. Need to see pattern. Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 7x7. Need to find dominant weather front: "One type of front covers far more area than the scattered pockets of other conditions." So find most frequent color (excluding maybe black '.'?). Count frequencies. Let's count quickly Example1 input. I'll list rows: 1: B . B . O . . 2: B B W B . B . 3: . . B B . R . 4: . . . . G . B 5: . Y . B . . B 6: . . B . R . A 7: . . B . O G B Count each non-'.' color. Initialize counts: B, O, W, R, G, Y, A. Row1: B (2), O (1) Row2: B (4), W (1) Row3: B (2), R (1) Row4: G (1), B (1) Row5: Y (1), B (2) Row6: B (1), R (1), A (1) Row7: B (2), O (1), G (1) Now sum B: row1 2 + row2 4 =6, row3 2=8, row4 1=9, row5 2=11, row6 1=12, row7 2=14. So B=14. Other counts: O: row1 1 + row7 1 =2. W:1. R: row3 1 + row6 1 =2. G: row4 1 + row7 1 =2. Y:1. A:1. Dominant is B (blue). Output shows A pattern (azure) shape maybe derived from positions of B? Let's see output 3x3: Output: . . A A A . . A . Positions (row,col) 0-index: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a shape maybe representing the "compact icon" of dominant front. Could be the shape of the most common color's bounding box? Let's compute bounding box of B cells in input. Find min row, max row, min col, max col of B. Rows with B: many. Let's locate extremes. Row0 (index0) has B at col0 and col2. So min row=0, max row maybe 6 (row6 has B at col2 and col6). So max row=6. Min col? B at col0 (row0). Max col? B at col6 (row6). So bounding box is whole grid 7x7. Not helpful. Maybe we need to find the shape of the dominant color after some reduction (e.g., downsample to 3x3 by majority in each 2x2 block?). 7x7 to 3x3 maybe by dividing into 3x3 regions (approx 2-3 cells each). Could be taking the dominant color in each of 9 subregions and mapping to A if dominant is the overall dominant? Let's test. Divide 7x7 into 3x3 blocks: each block size maybe floor(7/3)=2, with some remainder. Could be using 3x3 sliding window? Not. Look at output pattern: A's at positions maybe correspond to where the dominant color (B) is most dense relative to other colors? Let's compute a 3x3 grid of counts of B in each region. Define region rows: 0-1,2-3,4-6? Not equal. Better: maybe they compute the "centroid" of dominant color and then draw a 3x3 pattern centered on that? The pattern appears like a plus shape missing one corner? Actually pattern: . . A A A . . A . That's like a rotated 'L' shape? Coordinates: (0,2) top right, (1,0) left middle, (1,1) center, (2,1) middle bottom. That's like a shape of a "tetromino" (Z shape?). Not symmetrical. Let's examine Example2. Example2 input counts. Rows: 1: . G . G X G . 2: . . G G . . . 3: A . . . . . G 4: G Y G W G . G 5: . . W G B G G 6: . G G G . G . 7: . . . . . . G Count colors: G many, X, A, Y, W, B. Let' ... [4966 chars truncated]
"A city block is surveyed from above — whichever building material dominates the skyline determines which blueprint the city planner stamps onto the zoning permit."
120b: k=7
See: An aerial view of a city block with structures made of various materials. One material overwhelmingly dominates the landscape, while rare materials appear in isolated buildings.
Do: Survey the block and identify the prevailing construction material. Each material is associated with a specific zoning stamp — a small blueprint mark. Stamp the permit with the appropriate mark.
Grid: The city block is 7×7. The zoning stamp is 3×3, inked in azure on a dark permit.
We need to infer rule. We have 7x7 input, output is 3x3. Output contains only '.' and 'A' (azure) according to examples. So rule extracts a 3x3 pattern of azure based on dominant material? Let's analyze. We need to find which positions become A. Look at example1. Input 7x7, output 3x3: Output: . . A A A . . A . Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-6, cols 0-6. We need to see which cells in input correspond to something? Perhaps find the most frequent color (dominant) and then mark its positions relative? But output is only 3x3, maybe it's a 3x3 window that contains the rare material? Or maybe we need to locate the "rare material" (least frequent) and output a 3x3 mask where that material appears? Let's examine. Example1 input: Let's count frequencies quickly? Colors: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, X? Actually X appears? In example1 input there is X? I see none. Let's list grid: Row0: B . B . O . . Row1: B B W B . B . Row2: . . B B . R . Row3: . . . . G . B Row4: . Y . B . . B Row5: . . B . R . A Row6: . . B . O G B We need to find dominant material: maybe B (blue) appears many times. Count B: row0 col0,2; row1 col0,1,3,5; row2 col2,3; row3 col6; row4 col3,6; row5 col2,6? actually row5 col2 is B, col6 is A not B; row6 col2,6. That's many. So B is dominant. Rare materials: O appears at (0,4) and (6,4). Y at (4,1). A at (5,6). G at (3,4) and (6,5). W at (1,2). R at (2,5) and (5,4). So many rare. Output pattern maybe indicates location of dominant material relative to something? Let's see output A positions: coordinates in 3x3 output where A appears: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's shape like a small L. Maybe this corresponds to shape of dominant material cluster? Let's examine B positions in input: maybe there is a 3x3 region where B is missing? Not sure. Let's examine example2. Input grid: Row0: . G . G X G . Row1: . . G G . . . Row2: A . . . . . G Row3: G Y G W G . G Row4: . . W G B G G Row5: . G G G . G . Row6: . . . . . . G Dominant color? G appears many times. Count G: many. So dominant = G (green). Output: . A A . A . . A . Positions A: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a vertical line plus top right? Actually shape: column 1 rows0-2 all A, plus (0,2) extra. Maybe this corresponds to location of rare color A (azure) in input? Input has A at (2,0). That's azure. Output has A's not at same relative location? Let's see mapping: maybe we slide a 3x3 window over input to find where azure appears relative to dominant? Not. Example3 input: many R (red) dominant? Let's see: grid includes many R. Output: . . . A A A . . . A's across middle row all three columns. So shape is horizontal line. Example4 input: many R? Let's see: grid includes many R. Output same as example3: middle row all A. Example5 input: many G? Output same as example2? Actually output: . A A . A . . A . Same as example2. So pattern depends on something else. Example6 input: many R? Output same as example3 (middle row). Example7 input: many B? Output pattern same a ... [2401 chars truncated]
"Scouts survey a battlefield crowded with banners from many factions. The faction that fields the most soldiers gets its battle standard replicated on the war room map."
120b: k=3
See: A contested field where many factions have deployed forces. One faction vastly outnumbers the others, whose scattered units are too few to matter.
Do: Count the forces and determine which faction holds numerical superiority. Each faction carries a unique battle standard — a small, fixed emblem. Reproduce that emblem on the strategic map.
Grid: The battlefield is a 7×7 grid. The war room emblem is a 3×3 mark in azure on a dark map.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input 7x7, output 3x3. The description: count forces, determine which faction holds numerical superiority. Each faction carries a unique battle standard — a small, fixed emblem. Reproduce that emblem on the strategic map. War room emblem is a 3x3 mark in azure on a dark map. So output is 3x3 azure (A) pattern placed maybe where majority color? Let's examine examples. Example1 input grid 7x7 with many colors. Output: . . A A A . . A . So pattern of A's (azure) in 3x3 shape: positions (row1,col3), (row2,col1-2), (row3,col2). That's like a small shape maybe representing the majority faction? Let's compute counts of each color in input1. Let's list colors: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, M? Input1 lines: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count each non-.: B many, O 2, W1, R2, G2, Y1, A1. B is majority. So majority faction is B (blue). Their emblem is a small fixed 3x3 mark in azure (A). So we need to output that emblem (the azure shape) maybe always same shape? Let's see example2. Example2 input counts: Let's count quickly. Grid: Row1: . G . G X G . Row2: . . G G . . . Row3: A . . . . . G Row4: G Y G W G . G Row5: . . W G B G G Row6: . G G G . G . Row7: . . . . . . G Count colors: G many, X1, A1, Y1, W2, B1, others . . Let's count G: row1 positions 2,4,6 =3; row2 positions3,4=2 total5; row3 col7=1 total6; row4 col1,3,5,7 =4 total10; row5 col4,6,7 =3 total13; row6 col2,3,4,6 =4 total17; row7 col7=1 total18. So G=18. Others small. Majority G (green). Output is same pattern as before? Output2: . A A . A . . A . Positions: (1,2-3), (2,2), (3,2). That's different shape: row1 col2-3, row2 col2, row3 col2. That's like a vertical line with a top horizontal bar of length2. Compare to example1 shape: . . A / A A . / . A . That's like a rotated? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 1-indexed. Example1 shape coordinates: (1,3), (2,1),(2,2),(3,2). That's like a small L shape rotated? Example2 shape coordinates: (1,2),(1,3),(2,2),(3,2). That's like a T shape missing bottom? Actually shape looks like a small "└" rotated? Let's see. Example3 output: . . . A A A . . . That's a horizontal line of three A's in middle row. So shape varies per example. Likely shape corresponds to the emblem of the majority faction, which is predetermined per color. So each color (faction) has its own 3x3 azure emblem pattern. Need to map from majority color to pattern. We have three examples with majority colors: Example1 majority B (blue) => pattern1 (call pattern_B). Example2 majority G (green) => pattern2. Example3 majority R? Let's count example3. Example3 input: Row1: . . R . B X G Row2: . . R W . R . Row3: R R R Y R . . Row4: . R . R O R . Row5: R R . . R R M Row6: . R R . R . . Row7: X . Y R . R R Count R: many. Let's count quickly: Row1 col3=R (1). Row2 col3=R (2), col6=R (3). Row3 col1,2,3,5 =4 (total7). Row4 col2,4,6 =3 ... [1940 chars truncated]
"After a chaotic audition, the actor who appeared in the most scenes gets their signature mask hung on the marquee — each mask a different silhouette."
120b: k=2
See: A casting call where many performers appear on stage. One performer keeps showing up in scene after scene, while others make only fleeting cameos.
Do: Review the audition log and identify the performer with the most appearances. Each lead actor is known for a unique mask silhouette. Display that mask on the marquee.
Grid: The stage is 7×7. The marquee mask is 3×3, rendered in azure against a dark backdrop.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input 7x7, output 3x3. Need to find most frequent performer (color) that appears most times across grid? Then output its mask silhouette (unique shape) as azure (A) on black background. We need to find which color appears most in input, then extract its pattern? Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 7x7. Let's count occurrences of each color. I'll list rows: Row1: B . B . O . . Row2: B B W B . B . Row3: . . B B . R . Row4: . . . . G . B Row5: . Y . B . . B Row6: . . B . R . A Row7: . . B . O G B Count B: let's count. Row1: B at col1, col3 =>2. Row2: B at col1,2,4,6 =>4 (total6). Row3: B at col3,4 =>2 (8). Row4: B at col7 =>1 (9). Row5: B at col4,7 =>2 (11). Row6: B at col3 =>1 (12). Row7: B at col3,7 =>2 (14). So B appears 14 times. Other colors: O appears row1 col5, row7 col5 =>2. W appears row2 col3 =>1. R appears row3 col6, row6 col5 =>2. G appears row4 col5, row7 col6 =>2. Y appears row5 col2 =>1. A appears row6 col7 =>1. Thus most frequent is B (blue). Output grid shows azure A pattern. Let's see output 3x3: . . A A A . . A . So shape of B in input? Need to find a 3x3 region where B pattern matches? Let's locate B cluster maybe shape of B's most common 3x3 mask? Let's examine B positions relative to each other maybe shape of B's silhouette (connected component) maybe the most common shape of B? Let's map B positions coordinates (row, col) 1-indexed. (1,1),(1,3) (2,1),(2,2),(2,4),(2,6) (3,3),(3,4) (4,7) (5,4),(5,7) (6,3) (7,3),(7,7) We need to find a 3x3 pattern that appears somewhere? The output pattern . . A / A A . / . A . corresponds to shape like a T? Let's map A positions: (1,3), (2,1),(2,2), (3,2). That's shape: top right corner, middle left two, bottom middle. Could correspond to B pattern somewhere? Let's search for B pattern matching that shape within input. Need to find a 3x3 window where B's are at those relative positions (others maybe any color). Let's slide. Check window rows1-3 cols1-3: cells: (1,1) B, (1,2) ., (1,3) B (2,1) B, (2,2) B, (2,3) W (3,1) ., (3,2) ., (3,3) B Pattern of B's: positions (1,1),(1,3),(2,1),(2,2),(3,3). That's not same as output (which has (1,3),(2,1),(2,2),(3,2)). So not match. Window rows1-3 cols2-4: Rows1 cols2-4: . B . Row2: B W B Row3: . B B B positions: (1,3) relative (row1 col3) = B at (1,3) (relative col2?), let's compute relative coordinates within window (r,c) 1-3. B at (1,2) (since col3 overall). Actually window columns 2,3,4. So positions: (1,2) B, (2,1) B, (2,3) B, (3,2) B, (3,3) B. That's 5 B's shape: a plus missing center? Not match. Window rows2-4 cols1-3: Rows2: B B W Rows3: . . B Rows4: . . . B positions: (1,1),(1,2),(2,3). Not match. Window rows2-4 cols2-4: Rows2: B W B Rows3: . B B Rows4: . . . B positions: (1,1) B? Actually (row2 col2) B, (row2 col4) B, (row3 col3) B, (row3 col4) B. That's 4 B's. Window rows3-5 cols3-5: Rows3: B B . Rows4: . G . Rows5: B . . B positions: (1,1),(1,2),(3,1). Not m ... [8536 chars truncated]
"A garden overrun with many species yields to whichever plant spreads most aggressively — and the gardener marks the plot with that species' characteristic leaf pressed into clay."
120b: k=4
See: A wildly overgrown garden plot with many plant species. One species has spread everywhere, while rare specimens appear only once or twice.
Do: Identify the most prolific species by its sheer abundance. Each invasive species leaves a unique leaf impression. Press the dominant species' leaf into a small clay tile.
Grid: The garden plot is 7×7. The clay tile is 3×3, with the leaf print in azure on dark earth.
We need to infer rule. From examples, output is 3x3 grid with azure A marks where dominant species? Let's analyze. We have 7x7 input. Need to find most frequent color (excluding maybe something). Then output 3x3 pattern of A's corresponding to shape of that color? Let's examine Example1. Input1 grid 7x7. Let's count frequencies? Colors: B, ., O, W, R, G, Y, A, M? Actually M not present. Let's count quickly maybe B is most frequent. Output shows A's in certain positions: pattern: row1: . . A row2: A A . row3: . A . So shape like a plus missing top-left? Actually coordinates of A: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a small L shape? Let's see where B positions maybe correspond? Need to locate B pattern in input? Perhaps we need to find the most common 2x2 or 3x3 subpattern? Or find the most common color and then output its "leaf impression" which is a 3x3 pattern derived from the positions of that color relative to something. Maybe we need to find the most frequent color and then output a 3x3 mask where that color appears in the input's 3x3 sliding window that has highest count? Let's test. In Example1, find most frequent color: Let's approximate counts. B appears many times. Count B: Row1: B . B . O . . => 2 B. Row2: B B W B . B . => 4 B. Row3: . . B B . R . => 2 B. Row4: . . . . G . B => 1 B. Row5: . Y . B . . B => 2 B. Row6: . . B . R . A => 1 B. Row7: . . B . O G B => 2 B. Total B =14? Others less. So B dominant. Now output pattern of A's maybe corresponds to shape of B's occurrences within a 3x3 window that is most dense? Let's slide 3x3 over grid and count B's. Need to find window with max B count maybe 5? Then output pattern of where B's are within that window (relative positions) as A's. Let's test quickly. We need to compute 3x3 windows positions (top-left from (0,0) to (4,4)). Let's approximate maybe the window with most B's yields pattern . . A / A A . / . A . . Let's see if that matches B positions in that window. Let's try to locate such pattern in input. Look for B arrangement: positions relative: (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(2,1). That's shape like a small L with a tip at top right. Let's scan grid for that arrangement. Take rows 0-2, cols 0-2 window: rows0-2 cols0-2: Row0: B . B Row1: B B W Row2: . . B Positions of B: (0,0),(0,2),(1,0),(1,1),(2,2). That's 5 B's pattern not match. Window rows0-2 cols1-3: Rows0 col1-3: . B . Row1: B W B Row2: . B B B positions: (0,1),(1,0),(1,2),(2,1),(2,2). Not match. Window rows0-2 cols2-4: Rows0: B . O Row1: W B . Row2: B . . B positions: (0,0),(1,1),(2,0). That's 3. Window rows1-3 cols0-2: Rows1: B B W Row2: . . B Row3: . . . B positions: (0,0),(0,1),(1,2). Not match. Window rows1-3 cols1-3: Rows1: B W B Row2: . B B Row3: . . . B positions: (0,0),(0,2),(1,1),(1,2). That's 4. Window rows2-4 cols0-2: Rows2: . . B Row3: . . . Row4: . Y . B positions: (0,2). Not. Window rows2-4 cols1-3: Rows2: . B B Row3: . . G Row4: Y . B B positions: (0,1),(0,2),(2,2). Not. Window rows3- ... [9028 chars truncated]
See: The input is a rectangular grid with 8 rows and 4 columns, composed of two 4×4 halves stacked vertically. The top half contains a pattern made of green (G) cells and black (.) cells. The bottom half contains a pattern made of blue (B) cells and black (.) cells.
Do: Split the input grid into two 4×4 halves: the top half (green pattern) and the bottom half (blue pattern). For each cell position in the 4×4 grid, check whether that position is black (absent) in BOTH halves — that is, the cell is '.' in the top half AND '.' in the bottom half. If both are absent, place a red (R) cell at that position in the output. Otherwise, place a black (.) cell. The output is a single 4×4 grid.
Grid: The input grid is 4 columns wide and 8 rows tall, consisting of two equal 4×4 sub-grids stacked vertically. The output grid is 4×4. The background color is black (.).
"Two shields with holes reveal the vulnerable spots where arrows strike through."
120b: k=1
See: A warrior carries two shields stacked one behind the other — the front shield is forged from green iron, the rear from blue steel. Each shield has gaps where the metal was never filled in, leaving dark empty spaces.
Do: An archer fires arrows at the paired shields. Where both shields have holes — where neither green iron nor blue steel stands guard — the arrow passes clean through and leaves a red wound on the wall behind. Wherever at least one shield holds firm, the arrow is deflected and the wall stays unmarked.
Grid: The two shields sit one atop the other in the input, each a square slab four units across. The wall behind them, revealed in the output, is the same size as a single shield, dark except where it bleeds red.
We need to understand puzzle. Input consists of two 4x4 shields stacked vertically? In example, input grid appears 8 rows? Let's examine Example 1 input lines: ". G G ." ". G . G" ". . G ." "G G G G" "B B B B" "B B . ." "B B . ." ". B B ." That's 8 rows, each 4 columns. So top 4 rows are green shield (G) with some '.' (black) holes. Bottom 4 rows are blue shield (B) with holes '.'. Output is 4x4 grid: ". . . ." ". . R ." ". . . R" ". . . ." So red appears where both shields have holes (i.e., positions where top shield has '.' and bottom shield has '.'), else '.' (black). Indeed check: Let's map coordinates (row0-3 top shield, row4-7 bottom). For each column. Create matrix: Top rows (0-3): 0: . G G . 1: . G . G 2: . . G . 3: G G G G Bottom rows (4-7): 4: B B B B 5: B B . . 6: B B . . 7: . B B . Now compute holes: top '.' positions: (0,0),(0,3),(1,0),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,3),(3 none). bottom '.' positions: (5,2),(5,3),(6,2),(6,3),(7,0). Also bottom row 7 col0 '.'. Now intersection where both have '.' at same column row? Need align rows: The shields are stacked one atop the other, same size, so we compare each cell (i,j) where top row i (0-3) and bottom row i+4 (4-7). So pair rows: (0 with 4), (1 with5), (2 with6), (3 with7). Let's compute: Row0 vs Row4: top row0: . G G . ; bottom row4: B B B B . No '.' in bottom row4, so intersection none -> output row0 all '.'. Row1 vs Row5: top row1: . G . G ; bottom row5: B B . . . Intersection where both '.' at col2? top col2 '.' bottom col2 '.' yes. Also col3? top col3 G not '.'; col0 top '.' bottom B not '.'; col1 top G bottom B not '.' . So only col2 => output row1 col2 = R. Output row1: . . R . matches. Row2 vs Row6: top row2: . . G . ; bottom row6: B B . . . Intersection at col2 '.' both? top col2 G not '.'; col3 top '.' bottom '.' yes at col3. Also col0 top '.' bottom B not '.'; col1 top '.' bottom B not '.' . So col3 => R. Output row2 col3 R matches. Row3 vs Row7: top row3: G G G G ; bottom row7: . B B . . Intersection where top '.'? none, so all '.' output row3 all '.' matches. Thus rule: output cell is red if both top and bottom corresponding cells are '.' (black). Else output '.' (black). So essentially logical AND of holes. Now test input given: Test Input: ". G . G" "G G G ." ". . . G" "G G G ." ". . B B" ". . B B" ". B . ." "B B . ." Again 8 rows 4 columns. Top shield rows0-3, bottom rows4-7. Let's list rows: Row0: . G . G Row1: G G G . Row2: . . . G Row3: G G G . Row4: . . B B Row5: . . B B Row6: . B . . Row7: B B . . Now compute output 4x4 where red where both top and bottom cells are '.'. We need to pair rows: (0,4), (1,5), (2,6), (3,7). Create columns 0-3. Row0 vs Row4: Row0: col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 '.'; col3 G Row4: col0 '.'; col1 '.'; col2 B; col3 B Intersection '.' both: - col0: top '.' bottom '.' => red. - col1: top G not '.' => no. - col2: top '.' bottom B not '.' => no. - col3: top G not '.' => no. So output row0: R at col0, others '.'. Row1 v ... [1029 chars truncated]
"Two cell membranes, each with protein channels, are layered over a tissue. Only where both membranes have open pores can the staining dye seep through and mark the living tissue beneath."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A specimen slide divided into two layered membranes—one stained green, one stained blue—each with gaps in their coverage.
Do: Overlay the two membranes and find where both leave the tissue exposed. The dye penetrates only through shared openings, marking those sites red.
Grid: The input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 membrane layers stacked. The output is a single 4×4 tissue sample. Background is unstained black.
"Two nebulae—one emerald, one sapphire—drift across a star field. Only where both nebulae have voids in their dust does the red dwarf star behind them shine through to the observer."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A telescope view showing two overlapping nebula layers, one glowing green and one blue, each with dark gaps in their gas clouds.
Do: Where both nebulae have voids at the same position, the background red dwarf's light is visible. Mark those sightlines red in the observation chart.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 nebula maps. Output is a 4×4 stellar visibility chart. Background is empty space (black).
"Two coral reefs—one green with algae, one blue with sponges—guard a lagoon's floor. Only where both reefs have sandy gaps can the red anemones on the seabed below be spotted from the surface."
120b: k=2
See: A cross-section of two reef shelves stacked above a dark seabed, one encrusted green and one blue, each with bare sandy patches.
Do: Where both reef layers have gaps at the same position, the red anemones on the bottom are visible. Mark those positions red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 reef layers. Output is a 4×4 seabed view. Background is dark water (black).
We need to infer rule. Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, representing two 4x4 layers stacked: top 4 rows = upper reef layer? bottom 4 rows = lower reef layer? Output is 4x4 seabed view (maybe bottom layer view after marking red where both layers have gaps). Let's examine example1. Example1 Input rows (8): 1 . G G . 2 . G . G 3 . . G . 4 G G G G 5 B B B B 6 B B . . 7 B B . . 8 . B B . Interpretation: top 4 rows (1-4) are first reef layer (green and maybe gaps). bottom 4 rows (5-8) second layer (blue). Output 4x4: Rows: 1 . . . . 2 . . R . 3 . . . R 4 . . . . We need to see where both layers have gaps at same position. Gaps likely '.' (black). In top layer, '.' positions: row1 col1, col4? row1: . G G . => col1 and col4 are gaps. row2: . G . G => col1 and col3 gaps. row3: . . G . => col1,2,4 gaps. row4: G G G G => none. Bottom layer rows5-8: row5 B B B B => no gaps. row6 B B . . => col3,4 gaps. row7 B B . . => col3,4 gaps. row8 . B B . => col1,4 gaps. Now need positions where both layers have gaps at same (row, col) after aligning? Probably same relative coordinates within 4x4. So compare top row1 with bottom row5? Since stacked, row1 aligns with row5? Actually they are stacked vertically: top layer rows1-4, bottom layer rows5-8 correspond same columns but different depth. So position (r,c) in top layer corresponds to (r+4,c) in bottom layer. So we need positions where both are '.'. Let's compute: Row1 col1: top '.' ; bottom row5 col1 = B (not gap) => not both. Row1 col4: top '.' ; bottom row5 col4 = B => not. Row2 col1: top '.' ; bottom row6 col1 = B => not. Row2 col3: top '.' ; bottom row6 col3 = '.' => both gaps! So output should have red at (row2, col3). Output row2 col3 is R? Output row2: ". . R ." yes matches. Row3 col1: top '.' ; bottom row7 col1 = B => not. Row3 col2: top '.' ; bottom row7 col2 = B => not. Row3 col4: top '.' ; bottom row7 col4 = '.' => both gaps => output row3 col4 should be R. Output row3 col4 is R yes. Row4 none. Thus rule matches: output grid same size 4x4, mark red where both layers have '.' (gaps). All other cells become '.' (black). Indeed output only reds at those positions. Check Example2. Input rows: 1 G G G G 2 . G G . 3 . . G G 4 G . . . 5 . . . B 6 . . . B 7 . B . . 8 B . . B Top layer rows1-4. Bottom rows5-8. Find positions where both are '.'. Top layer '.' positions: Row1 none. Row2 col1, col4. Row3 col1, col2. Row4 col2, col3, col4? row4: G . . . => col2,3,4 are '.'. Bottom layer '.' positions: Row5: . . . B => col1,2,3 are '.'. Row6: . . . B => col1,2,3 '.'. Row7: . B . . => col1,3,4 '.'? Wait row7: ". B . ." => col1 '.', col2 B, col3 '.', col4 '.'. Row8: B . . B => col2,3 '.'. Now compare each row index: Row1 top vs row5 bottom: top row1 has no gaps, so none. Row2 top vs row6 bottom: top row2 gaps at col1,4. Bottom row6 gaps at col1,2,3. Intersection: col1 only. So output row2 col1 should be R. Output row2: "R . . ." yes. Row3 t ... [1802 chars truncated]
"Two circuit masks are layered during chip fabrication—one for the green oxide layer, one for the blue metal layer. Only where both masks are transparent does the red laser etch the silicon wafer beneath."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A fabrication stack showing two photolithography masks, one green-tinted and one blue-tinted, each with opaque and transparent zones.
Do: Align the masks. Where both are transparent at the same cell, the laser etches through and marks the wafer red. All other positions remain unetched.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 masks. Output is a 4×4 wafer surface. Background is unetched silicon (black).
"Two guardian spirits weave enchantments—one in threads of jade, one in threads of lapis—across a sacred threshold. Only where both spirits leave gaps in their wards can the red fire of the underworld seep through."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A threshold woven with two layers of magical protection, one shimmering green and one blue, each with unprotected gaps.
Do: Where both enchantments are absent at the same spot, infernal red flame breaks through the threshold. Mark those breaches red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 ward layers. Output is a 4×4 threshold map. Background is sealed stone (black).
"Two troupes rehearse on the same floor—one in green silks, one in blue. Each leaves certain tiles unoccupied. Only on tiles where both troupes leave space does the choreographer place a red rose for the finale."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A rehearsal floor divided into two practice sessions viewed from above, one troupe in green and one in blue, each occupying certain tiles.
Do: Compare both formations. Where neither troupe occupies a tile, the choreographer marks it with a red rose for the final number.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 floor plans. Output is a 4×4 rose placement map. Background is bare floor (black).
"Two mineral strata—one veined with malachite green, one with azurite blue—lie above a magma chamber. Only where both strata have fractures aligned can the red magma push through to the surface as a volcanic vent."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A geological cross-section showing two rock layers, one green-mineralized and one blue, each with fissures and solid sections.
Do: Where fractures in both strata align at the same position, magma erupts through, marking those surface vents red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 rock strata. Output is a 4×4 surface eruption map. Background is solid crust (black).
"Two sheets of pastry dough, each with different holes cut out, are stacked atop a filling. Only where both sheets have cutouts does the jam bubble up and caramelize red during baking."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A baking tray with two layers of dough—one tinged green, one tinged blue—each with irregular cutouts, pressed over a dark filling.
Do: Stack the two dough sheets and find where both have holes aligned. The filling rises through those double openings and turns red when baked.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 dough sheets vertically stacked. Output is a 4×4 grid showing where filling emerged. Background is black.
"Two musicians each play notes over a shared measure, leaving certain beats silent. Only on beats where both players rest does the resonance of the empty hall itself become audible—a haunting red tone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A score split into two staves—one for a green-toned instrument, one for a blue-toned instrument—each with notes and rests across a four-beat bar.
Do: Compare the two staves beat by beat. Where both instruments rest simultaneously, the hall's own voice fills the silence, marked in red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 staves stacked. Output is a single 4×4 grid of resonances. Background is silence (black).
"Two defensive formations cover the field, one in green jerseys, one in blue. Only the gaps left unguarded by both teams allow the striker's red-hot shot to reach the goal."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A playing field viewed from above, showing two defensive squads arranged in 4×4 zones—green defenders on one half, blue on the other—with gaps in their coverage.
Do: Overlay both formations. Where neither team has a defender stationed, the striker's shot blazes through, marked red in the goal grid.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 defensive zones stacked. Output is a 4×4 target grid. Background is empty pitch (black).
"Two cloud layers drift across the sky—one emerald-tinged, one sapphire. Only where both layers break apart simultaneously can the crimson sunset light reach the ground below."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sky cross-section with two stacked cloud decks, one green-hued and one blue-hued, each with scattered breaks in their cover.
Do: Find where gaps in both cloud layers align vertically. Sunset light passes through these double clearings and paints those ground spots red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 cloud layers. Output is a 4×4 ground illumination map. Background is shadow (black).
"Two perforated screens of colored glass—one jade, one cobalt—hang in a cathedral window. Only where both screens have missing panes does the rose-colored light from outside stream through to the nave floor."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cathedral window composed of two lattice screens stacked vertically, one of green glass and one of blue, each with certain panes absent.
Do: Align the two screens. Where both have absent panes at the same position, the rosy exterior light floods through, marking those floor tiles red.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 glass screens. Output is a 4×4 floor illumination pattern. Background is dark stone (black).
"Two fortress walls stand in sequence, each with arrow slits cut at different positions. Only where both walls have slits aligned can the enemy's fire arrows reach the inner keep and set it ablaze in red."
120b: k=1
See: A fortification cross-section: two defensive walls, one greenstone and one bluestone, each with narrow openings scattered across their face.
Do: Find positions where both walls have openings aligned. Fire arrows pass through these double slits and ignite the keep wall behind, marked red.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 wall faces stacked. Output is a 4×4 keep wall. Background is unburnt stone (black).
We need to infer rule. Input is 4 columns by 8 rows: two 4x4 walls stacked: first 4 rows maybe greenstone wall (G and .?), second 4 rows blue wall (B and .?). Output is 4x4 keep wall with red where double openings align. Let's examine example 1. Input rows (8): 1 . G G . 2 . G . G 3 . . G . 4 G G G G 5 B B B B 6 B B . . 7 B B . . 8 . B B . Interpretation: top 4 rows = green wall face (G and .). bottom 4 rows = blue wall face (B and .). Output 4x4: Row1 . . . . Row2 . . R . Row3 . . . R Row4 . . . . We need to see where openings align: openings are '.' cells in each wall. For each column and row position (within 4x4), if both top and bottom have '.' at same coordinates, then output red at that coordinate? Let's test. Create 4x4 grid positions (r1-4, c1-4). Top wall (rows1-4): r1: . G G . r2: . G . G r3: . . G . r4: G G G G Bottom wall (rows5-8): r1 (row5): B B B B r2 (row6): B B . . r3 (row7): B B . . r4 (row8): . B B . Now find positions where both are '.'. List top '.' positions: (1,1), (1,4) (2,1), (2,3) (3,1), (3,2), (3,4) (4, none) Bottom '.' positions: row5: none (all B) row6: (2,3), (2,4) row7: (3,3), (3,4) row8: (4,1) Now intersect: positions common: Check each top '.' if also bottom '.' same coordinates. (1,1): bottom row1 col1 is B -> no. (1,4): bottom row1 col4 B -> no. (2,1): bottom row2 col1 B -> no. (2,3): bottom row2 col3 . -> yes! So (2,3) should be red. Output row2 col3 is R? Output row2: . . R . yes matches. (3,1): bottom row3 col1 B -> no. (3,2): bottom row3 col2 B -> no. (3,4): bottom row3 col4 . -> yes (3,4) red. Output row3 col4 is R, matches. (4,1): top none, bottom (4,1) . but top not '.' so no. Thus rule matches: output red where both walls have '.' at same coordinate. All other cells black '.'? Output shows '.' for others. Yes. Thus transformation: produce 4x4 grid where each cell is red if both corresponding cells in top 4 rows (green wall) and bottom 4 rows (blue wall) are '.' (openings). Else black '.'. Now apply to test input. Test Input rows: 1 . G . G 2 G G G . 3 . . . G 4 G G G . 5 . . B B 6 . . B B 7 . B . . 8 B B . . Let's separate top (rows1-4) and bottom (rows5-8). Top wall (rows1-4): r1: . G . G r2: G G G . r3: . . . G r4: G G G . Bottom wall (rows5-8): r1 (row5): . . B B r2 (row6): . . B B r3 (row7): . B . . r4 (row8): B B . . Now find '.' positions in each. Top '.' positions: r1: (1,1), (1,3) r2: (2,4) r3: (3,1), (3,2), (3,3) r4: (4,4) Bottom '.' positions: r1: (1,1), (1,2) r2: (2,1), (2,2) r3: (3,1), (3,3), (3,4) r4: (4,3), (4,4) Now intersect coordinates: Check each top '.': (1,1): bottom (1,1) . => yes => red at (1,1) (1,3): bottom (1,3) is B (since row5 col3 B) => no (2,4): bottom (2,4) B => no (3,1): bottom (3,1) . => yes => red at (3,1) (3,2): bottom (3,2) B => no (3,3): bottom (3,3) . => yes => red at (3,3) (4,4): bottom (4,4) . => yes => red at (4,4) Thus red cells at (1,1), (3,1), (3,3), (4,4). All others black '.'. Now ... [369 chars truncated]
"Two stagehands each hold a shadow screen with cutouts. Only where both screens have openings does the red spotlight behind them reach the performer, bathing those spots in crimson."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A backstage view of two shadow screens held in sequence—one painted green, one blue—each with holes and solid patches, blocking a red spotlight.
Do: Overlay the two screens from audience perspective. Where both have cutouts aligned, the red light passes through and illuminates those stage spots.
Grid: Input is 4 wide by 8 tall, two 4×4 screens. Output is a 4×4 stage floor lit in red where light passes. Background is dark (black).
"Two trellises of climbing vines—one with jade leaves, one with indigo blooms—shade a garden bed. Only in patches where both trellises have bare spots do red wildflowers spring up, kissed by unfiltered sun."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A garden bed beneath two layered trellises, one covered in green growth and one in blue, each with gaps in their foliage.
Do: Find where both trellises leave the soil exposed to sunlight. Red wildflowers bloom only in those doubly-uncovered patches.
Grid: Input is 4 columns by 8 rows, two 4×4 trellis canopies. Output is a 4×4 flower bed. Background is bare soil (black).
See: The input grid has a black background with exactly two colored pixels: one red (R) and one blue (B), placed at different positions. No other non-black pixels exist.
Do: Draw a green path connecting R and B (the endpoints themselves remain their original colors; only the intermediate cells become green). To construct the path: (1) Compute the vertical distance dy and horizontal distance dx between R and B. (2) The path is built starting from R toward B. Take exactly one diagonal step (moving one cell toward B both vertically and horizontally). (3) Next, draw a straight segment in whichever axis has the greater distance (vertical if dy > dx, horizontal if dx > dy). This straight segment has length |dy - dx| and is placed immediately after that first diagonal step (i.e., near the R end of the path). (4) Finally, continue with diagonal steps (each moving one cell toward B in both row and column) until reaching B. The total path uses min(dy, dx) diagonal steps and |dy - dx| straight steps. The straight portion always sits near R's end of the path.
Grid: Rectangular grid of arbitrary dimensions (observed up to 16x16). Background is black (.). The grid uses a standard row-column coordinate system with (0,0) at top-left. The grid dimensions and positions of R and B vary across instances. The output grid has the same dimensions as the input, with the only change being the addition of green (G) cells forming the connecting path.
"A river finds its way down a mountainside, flowing straight where the slope is steep and cutting diagonally across gentle terrain."
120b: k=1
See: Two signal fires burn on a dark plain — one a red flame and one a blue flame — separated by empty night. They are beacons waiting to be linked.
Do: A green vine grows from the red flame toward the blue, seeking connection. The vine prefers to travel diagonally — cutting across the field at a slant — but where the distance in one direction far exceeds the other, it must first run straight like a river in a canyon, hugging close to the red flame's side before it can angle freely. The vine always gets its straight running out of the way early, near the red end, then sweeps diagonally the rest of the journey until it reaches the blue flame. The flames themselves are never overgrown — they remain their original colors, proud endpoints of the green bridge between them.
Grid: A dark rectangular plain of arbitrary size. Two lone colored embers — one red, one blue — sit somewhere on the field. After the vine grows, every cell it passes through turns green, but nothing else on the plain changes.
We need to infer rule. From description: two points red and blue. Draw a green path from red to blue. Preference: diagonal, but if distance in one direction far exceeds other, must first run straight near red, then diagonal rest. Essentially path is like: start at red, move straight (horizontal or vertical) for some steps to reduce the larger delta, then move diagonally (i.e., one step both row and column) until reaching blue. The straight segment is near red end. The diagonal segment continues to blue. In example 1: Input grid 15x15. Red at (row1? Let's index from 0). Let's map coordinates: rows 0-14, columns 0-14. Red at row1 col6 (since line 2 has R at column 6). Blue at row12 col3 (line 13 has B at col3). So red (1,6), blue (12,3). Compute delta rows = 12-1 = 11 downwards. delta cols = 3-6 = -3 leftwards. Absolute values: dr=11, dc=3. Larger is dr. According to rule, first run straight (vertical) near red to reduce dr until dr equals dc? Actually they said "where the distance in one direction far exceeds the other, it must first run straight like a river in a canyon, hugging close to the red flame's side before it can angle freely." So we need to run straight for the excess difference: excess = dr - dc = 8? Wait dr=11, dc=3, difference =8. So we should move vertically 8 steps first, then diagonal for remaining 3 steps (since after reducing dr to 3, both equal). Let's test output: In output, green cells from (2,5?) Let's list. Output shows green column at col5? Actually output rows 2-11 have G at column5? Let's examine: Row2 (index2) has G at column5? Input row2 (index2) originally all . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Output row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . .". That's column5 (0-index). Row3 same column5. Row4 same column5. Row5 same column5. Row6 same column5. Row7 same column5. Row8 same column5. Row9 same column5. Row10 same column5. Row11 has G at column4? Wait row11 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's column4. So path: Starting at red (1,6). Then green at (2,5) (down-left diagonal). Actually row2 col5 is diagonal step (down-left). Then continues down-left diagonal until row10 col5? Wait row10 col5 is same column5, row10 index10. Let's compute: Starting (1,6). Diagonal down-left moves to (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), (6,1), (7,0) would go out of bounds. But output shows vertical line at column5 not diagonal. Let's examine more carefully. Maybe we misread coordinates. Let's list output rows with indices: Row0: all . Row1: R at col6. Row2: G at col5. Row3: G at col5. Row4: G at col5. Row5: G at col5. Row6: G at col5. Row7: G at col5. Row8: G at col5. Row9: G at col5. Row10: G at col5. Row11: G at col4. Row12: B at col3. So path: from red (1,6) go straight down (vertical) at column5? Wait red column6, but green column5. So first step maybe left (horizontal) then vertical? Actually there is a shift left by 1 at start, then vertical down column5, then at row11 shift left again to column4 then down to blue at (12,3) which ... [10509 chars truncated]
"A nerve impulse travels from one synapse to another — it races straight along the axon where the myelin sheath is thickest, then branches dendritically as it nears its target receptor."
120b: k=2
See: Two synaptic terminals of different types rest in a field of dormant tissue.
Do: Fire a signal between the terminals: it accelerates linearly where the channel is narrow, then arcs dendritically toward the receiving end. The signal trace stains green; the terminals keep their original markers.
Grid: Black background represents dormant neural tissue. The two colored pixels are synaptic terminals. Green cells are the stained signal pathway.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has two colored pixels: one red (R) and one blue (B). Output adds green path connecting them, following a certain pattern: "accelerates linearly where the channel is narrow, then arcs dendritically toward the receiving end." Let's interpret. In Example1: Input grid 15x15. B at (row13, col4) (0-index? Let's use 0-index rows). R at (row1, col6). Output: green cells form a vertical line from just below R downwards (same column as R? Actually R at col6 (0-index maybe 5?). Let's map coordinates: Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14. Input1: Row1 (index1) has R at column6? The line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." So columns: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6? Actually there are 7th position after six dots. So column6 (0-index). B at row12 (index12) column3? Row12 line: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." So column3 (0-index). Output: green cells appear from row2 to row11 at column5? Let's see output lines: Row2 (index2) ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." So column5? Actually there is a G at column5 (0-index). Row3 same column5, etc. Up to row10 (index10) same column5. Row11 (index11) ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." So at column4? Wait row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's column4. So the path goes down vertically from just below R (row2) column5? Wait R column6, but G column5 (one left). Let's examine: R at col6, G column5 (one left). So path starts adjacent left of R, goes straight down (same column5) until near B, then at row11 column4 (one left again) then maybe diagonal to B? Actually B at row12 col3. The green path at row11 col4 is diagonal adjacent to B (row12 col3). So path is like a line that goes down then left diagonal to B. In Example2: Input 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: Input lines have 12 columns. R at row1 col1? Row1: ". R . . . . . . . . . ." So column1. B at row13 col8? Row13 line: ". . . . . . . . B . . ." So column8 (0-index). Output: green path starts from just right of R? Let's see output row2: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." So G at column2 (0-index). That's right of R (col1). Then continues down column2 until row7 (index7) same column2. Then at row8 (index8) ". . . G . . . . . . . ." G at column3 (one right). Then continues diagonal down-right each row until reaching B? Let's see rows: row9 ". . . . G . . . . . . ." column4, row10 column5, row11 column6, row12 column7, row13 column8? Actually B at row13 col8, but output row13 is ". . . . . . . G . . ." column7? Wait row13 line: ". . . . . . . G . . ." That's column7 (0-index). That's left of B (col8). Then B at col8 row13 unchanged. So path goes down from R column1 to row7 column1? Actually start at column2 (right of R). So path goes down vertically, then at some point shifts right one column and continues down-right diagonal to near B, ending one left of B. Thus rule: Connect the two terminals with a path of G that moves orthogonally (vertical) then diagonally (45-degree) to reach near the other terminal, staying adjacent ... [10447 chars truncated]
"A comet swings between two gravitational wells — it falls straight inward where one body's pull dominates, then curves diagonally through the shared gravity field as it approaches the second body."
120b: fail
See: Two celestial bodies of different spectral class sit in the void of space.
Do: Plot the comet's trajectory between them. Near one body, the path is drawn straight by dominant gravity; as both influences balance, the trajectory bends diagonally toward the other body. The comet trail glows distinctly from both bodies.
Grid: Black space is the background. The two colored pixels are celestial bodies. Green cells are the comet's luminous trail.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has two colored pixels: one red (R) and one blue (B). Output adds green trail (G) connecting them in a certain path: start near R? Let's examine Example1. Grid size 15x15. Input: R at (row1? Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14). Input shows R at row1 col6 (since row0 all ., row1 has . . . . . . R .). B at row12 col3 (row12 . . . B .). Output: R unchanged, B unchanged. Green cells form a path from near R downwards then leftwards to B? Let's map coordinates. R at (1,6). B at (12,3). Output green cells: many at column5? Let's list: rows 2-11 have G at column5? Actually output rows: Row2 (index2) has G at col5? Row2 line: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . .". That's col5 (0-index). Row3 same col5. Up to row10 (index10) same col5. Row11 (index11) has G at col4? Wait row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's col4. So path goes down from row2 to row10 at column5, then at row11 moves left one column to col4, then row12 has B at col3 (unchanged). No green at row12 col? Actually row12 line: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . .". So green stops before B. Thus path is vertical line from just below R (row2) down to row10 at column5 (same column as R? R column6, green column5, so left of R by 1). Then diagonal? Actually after row10, at row11 column4 (down-left diagonal). Then maybe would continue diagonal to B at (12,3) but they stop before B, leaving B unchanged. So path is like a line that goes straight down from near R, then when reaching same row as B? B row12, they shift left one column each step? But only one step left shown (col5 to col4). Not enough to reach col3. Maybe rule: draw line from R to B using Manhattan path: first vertical then horizontal? But they only moved one left, not all the way. Let's examine Example2. Input size 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: lines show 12 columns. R at row1 col1 (since row0 all ., row1 " . R . . . . . . . . . . "). B at row13 col8 (0-index). Output: green cells form a diagonal from near R down-right to B? Let's list output rows: Row2 (index2): ". . G . . . . . . . . .": G at col2. Row3: same col2. Row4: same col2. Row5: same col2. Row6: same col2. Row7: same col2. Row8: same col2. Row9: ". . . G . . . . . . . .": G at col3. Row10: ". . . . G . . . . . . .": col4. Row11: ". . . . . G . . . . . .": col5. Row12: ". . . . . . G . . . . .": col6. Row13: ". . . . . . . G . . . .": col7. Row14: B unchanged at col8. So path: start at row2 col2 (one down and one right from R at (1,1) -> (2,2)). Then continues straight down (vertical) at same column col2 for rows 2-8 (i.e., rows 2-8 inclusive). Then at row9, column shifts right to col3, then continues diagonal down-right each row until reaching column7 at row13, then B at row13 col8 (since B row13 col8). Actually B row13 col8, path ends at row13 col7 (one left of B). So pattern: vertical line from just below R, then at some point start moving diagonally towards B, ending one cell left of B (or above ... [10605 chars truncated]
"A ship tacks between two harbor lights — it sails close-hauled on a straight bearing where the wind allows, then comes about on diagonal reaches to make the distant light."
120b: k=2
See: Two harbor beacons of different color shine across a dark sea.
Do: Chart the ship's course between them. Near one beacon, the vessel holds a straight heading where one cardinal direction dominates; it then tacks diagonally to cover the cross-distance to the other beacon. The wake shows in a color distinct from both lights.
Grid: The dark water is the background. The two colored pixels are harbor beacons. Green cells are the ship's wake.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has two colored pixels: one B (blue) and one R (red). Output adds a line of G (green) connecting them in a specific pattern: a straight line in one cardinal direction from one beacon, then diagonal to the other. Let's examine Example1 coordinates. Grid 15x15. Input: R at (row1? Let's index from 0 top). Row1? Actually line 2: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." That's row index 1, column 6 (0-index). B at row12 (index 12), column3? line: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's row12, col3. Output shows G forming a path from R to B: Starting near R, vertical line downwards (same column 5? Wait R column 6). In output, G appears at column5? Let's check output rows: Row2 (index2) has ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . .". That's column5 (0-index). So G column is 5, one left of R column6. Row3 also column5, etc. So path goes from just left of R, downwards vertically until row11 (index11) where G at column5. Then at row11 (index11) output shows ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's column4? Wait row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's column4 (0-index). So at row11, G shifts left one column (diagonal) to column4. Then continues down? Actually after that row12 is B at column3 unchanged. So path: start at (row1, col5) (just left of R), go down vertically to row10 (col5). At row11, move diagonally down-left to (row11, col4). Then next row12 is B at col3, but there is no G at row12 col? Actually B at (12,3). The diagonal from (11,4) to (12,3) would be another step down-left, but they didn't place G at (12,3) because that's B. So path ends adjacent to B? Actually B is at (12,3). The G at (11,4) is diagonal neighbor to B. So path is L-shaped: vertical then diagonal. Example2: Input grid 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: lines show 12 columns. R at row1 col1? Actually second line: ". R . . . . . . . . . ." That's row1 col1 (0-index). B at row13 (index13) col8? line: ". . . . . . . . B . . ." That's row13 col8. Output shows G path: Starting at (row2, col2?) Let's examine output rows: Row2 (index2) ". . G . . . . . . . . .". That's col2. So G at column2 (0-index). That's one right of R? R at col1, so G at col2 (right). Then vertical down column2 until row? At row8 (index8) output ". . . G . . . . . . . .". That's col3? Wait row8 line: ". . . G . . . . . . . .". That's col3. So at row8, G shifts right one column (diagonal) to column3. Then continues down column3 until row13? At row13 (index13) output ". . . . . . . G . . . .". That's col7? Wait need to map. Let's list rows with G positions: Row2 (index2): col2 Row3 (3): col2 Row4 (4): col2 Row5 (5): col2 Row6 (6): col2 Row7 (7): col2 Row8 (8): col2? Actually row8 line: ". . . G . . . . . . . .". That's col3. So at row8, shift right. Row9 (9): ". . . . G . . . . . . .": col4 Row10 (10): ". . . . . G . . . . . .": col5 Row11 (11): ". . . . . . G . . . . .": col6 Row12 (12): ". . . . . . . G . . . .": col7 Row13 (13): B at col8 (unchanged). ... [11013 chars truncated]
"A signal trace routes between two pins on a circuit board — it runs straight along a bus line where clearance is tight, then angles diagonally through open board space to reach the destination pad."
120b: k=2
See: Two component pads of different voltage marking sit on a bare circuit board.
Do: Route a trace between them. Where one axis of separation greatly exceeds the other, the trace runs straight near one pad; it then cuts diagonally across open substrate to reach the other pad. The copper trace color differs from both pad markings.
Grid: The dark substrate is the background. The two colored pixels are component pads. Green cells are the routed copper trace.
We need to infer rule: Given two colored pads (B and R) placed on black background. Need to draw green trace connecting them, following pattern: trace runs straight near one pad then diagonal across open substrate to other pad. In examples, trace is green (G). Let's analyze Example1. Input grid 15x15. B at (row12, col4?) Let's index rows starting 0. Actually row indices: row0 top. In example1 input: line 13 (0-index row12) has ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . .". So B at column3 (0-index). R at row1 col6? line2 (row1) ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . .". So R at column6. So B lower left, R upper right. Output: green trace from R downwards vertically then diagonally to B? Let's see output: G cells from row2 to row11 at column5? Actually output shows G at column5 (0-index?) Let's map: Output rows: row2 (index2) has ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . .". That's column5 (0-index). Row3 same column5, etc until row10. Row11 has ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's column4? Wait row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's column4. So at row11 column4, then row12 has B unchanged at column3. So trace goes vertical down from just below R? R at (1,6). The trace starts at row2 column5? That's one left and one down from R? Actually R at (1,6). The trace at (2,5) is diagonal down-left from R. Then continues straight down column5 until row10 (row10 col5). Then at row11, trace moves diagonal down-left to column4 (row11 col4). Then B at (12,3) is adjacent diagonal? B at (12,3) is two left? Actually row12 col3. So trace ends adjacent? The pattern: When vertical distance > horizontal distance? Let's compute separation: delta rows = 12-1 =11. delta cols = 3-6 = -3 (abs 3). So vertical >> horizontal. According to description: "Where one axis of separation greatly exceeds the other, the trace runs straight near one pad; it then cuts diagonally across open substrate to reach the other pad." So they run straight along the dominant axis (vertical) near one pad, then diagonal to reach other pad. In example1, they started diagonal from R to get onto the vertical line (column5) then go straight down, then diagonal to B. Actually they started diagonal immediately from R to column5 (one left). Then vertical down many rows, then diagonal to B. So algorithm: Determine dominant axis (larger absolute difference). Choose the pad with larger coordinate difference? They run straight near one pad (maybe the one with larger separation axis?). In example1, vertical dominant, they run vertical near R? Actually they run vertical near column5 which is close to R column6 (one left). So they start near R, then vertical, then diagonal to B. Example2: Input 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's see. R at (1,1). B at (13,8). delta rows =12, delta cols =7. Vertical larger (12>7). Output: trace starts near R? Let's see output: G at (2,2) (row2 col2) diagonal down-right from R (since R at (1,1)). Then vertical down column2 until row7? Actually rows 2-7 have G at col2. ... [10750 chars truncated]
"A rainbow bridge extends between two realms — it stretches straight across the void where the gap is widest in one direction, then bends diagonally through the mists to touch the far shore."
120b: k=2
See: Two realm-gates of different divine aspect float in primordial darkness.
Do: Conjure a bridge between them. The span runs straight where one dimension of the void dominates, near one gate; it then arcs diagonally through the remaining distance to meet the other. The bridge shimmers in its own light; both gates retain their aspect.
Grid: The void is the black background. The two colored pixels are realm-gates. Green cells are the bridge spans.
We need to infer rule: Given two colored pixels (B and R) in input, output draws a green bridge connecting them: a line that goes straight vertically/horizontally then diagonally? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input grid 15x15. B at (row13, col4) (0-index? Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14). R at (row1, col6). Output: green cells from just below R downwards vertically in column 5? Let's map. Input1: R at (1,6). B at (12,3). Output: green cells positions: Starting at (2,5)?? Let's list output green coordinates from example1 output. Rows (0-index): 0: none 1: R at (1,6) 2: G at (2,5) 3: G at (3,5) 4: G at (4,5) 5: G at (5,5) 6: G at (6,5) 7: G at (7,5) 8: G at (8,5) 9: G at (9,5) 10: G at (10,5) 11: G at (11,4) 12: B at (12,3) So green path: starts at (2,5) directly below and left of R? R at (1,6). The first green is at (2,5) which is down one row and left one column (diagonal down-left). Then continues vertically down column 5 until row10. At row11, green shifts left to column4 (down-left diagonal) to meet B at (12,3) after another diagonal? Actually B at (12,3). At row11 col4 is G, then row12 col3 is B. So path: from R, go diagonally down-left one step, then go straight down (vertical) for several steps, then diagonal down-left again to reach B. So pattern: bridge runs straight where one dimension dominates near one gate, then arcs diagonally through remaining distance to meet other. Interpretation: Choose axis where distance in one dimension (row difference) is larger than column difference? Let's compute differences: R (1,6) to B (12,3). Row diff = 11, col diff = -3 (abs 3). Row diff larger. So path: start near R, go vertically (row direction) for most of distance, then diagonal to adjust column offset near B. In example, they first moved diagonal one step (maybe to align column to be same as B? Actually after diagonal, column becomes 5, still not equal to B's column 3. Then vertical down column 5 for many rows, then final diagonal steps to reach column 3 at row12. But they only did one diagonal at end (row11 col4). That's only one column shift left, not enough to go from col5 to col3 (needs 2). Wait they also had initial diagonal from col6 to col5 (shift -1). Then later diagonal from col5 to col4 (shift -1). That's total shift -2, matching col diff -3? Actually need shift -3 from 6 to 3. They shifted -1 initially, -1 later = -2, not -3. But B column is 3, final green at row11 col4, then B at row12 col3 (shift -1). So total shift -3 across path: -1 (first diagonal), -1 (second diagonal), -1 (final step into B not green). So okay. So algorithm: draw a line of green cells connecting the two gates using a "Manhattan+diagonal" path: first move one step diagonally towards the target, then move straight in the dominant direction (row) until near target, then finish with diagonal steps? Let's examine example2. Example2: Input grid 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: rows 0-14, columns 0-11. R at (1,1). B at (13,8). Row diff = ... [9670 chars truncated]
"A dancer crosses the floor from one partner to another — chasséing in a straight line where the floor is clear, then spiraling diagonally into the arms of the waiting partner."
120b: fail
See: Two dancers in different costumes stand apart on a darkened dance floor.
Do: Choreograph the crossing between them. Near one dancer, the steps travel straight where one direction of distance dominates; the remaining approach is made on the diagonal, step by step, until the other dancer is reached. The footwork marks the floor in a new color; both dancers hold their positions.
Grid: The dark floor is the background. The two colored pixels are dancers. Green cells mark the choreographed path.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input has two colored pixels: B (blue) and R (red). Output adds green path connecting them. The description: "Near one dancer, the steps travel straight where one direction of distance dominates; the remaining approach is made on the diagonal, step by step, until the other dancer is reached." So path is like L-shaped? Actually look at Example1: Input positions: R at (row1? Let's index 0-based). Grid 15x15. R at row1 col6? Let's count: row index 1 (second row) column 6 (0-based). B at row12 col3 (13th row, 4th column). Output shows green column at col5? Let's examine output: rows 2-11 have G at column5? Actually output rows 2-11 (0-index) show G at column5 (col5). Row11 (index 11) has G at col4? Wait row11 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's row11 (12th row) column4. So path goes vertically down from R's column (col6) to row? Let's map. Coordinates: Use (r,c). Input R at (1,6). B at (12,3). Output: G cells at (2,5)?? Let's list from output: Row0: all . Row1: same as input: R at (1,6) Row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." => G at col5 (0-index). Row2 index 2. Row3: same G at col5. Rows 4-10: G at col5. Row11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." => G at col4. Row12: B at (12,3) unchanged. Thus path: Starting from just below R? Actually R at (1,6). The path starts at (2,5) which is down one row and left one column (diagonal down-left). Then continues straight down column5 (c=5) until row10 (index10). At row11, path moves diagonal down-left again to (11,4). Then B at (12,3) is one more diagonal down-left from (11,4). So path is a diagonal line from R to B? Not exactly: It goes diagonal for one step, then vertical, then diagonal again. That's like moving in a "king's move" path that prefers vertical/horizontal when one direction distance dominates, else diagonal steps. Let's compute differences: R (1,6) to B (12,3). delta rows = 11, delta cols = -3. So absolute row diff > col diff. According to description: "Near one dancer, the steps travel straight where one direction of distance dominates; the remaining approach is made on the diagonal, step by step, until the other dancer is reached." Means we first move straight in the dominant direction (rows) until the remaining distance equals the other direction? Actually they did: first diagonal step reduces both row and col diff by 1 each: from (1,6) to (2,5). Now remaining delta rows = 10, delta cols = -2. Still rows dominate. Then they moved straight down (vertical) for 8 steps? Actually they moved down column5 from rows 2 to 10 (inclusive). That's 9 steps? Let's count: rows 2-10 inclusive = 9 rows. Starting at row2 col5, after moving down 9 steps you reach row11 col5? Wait row10 is index10, col5. Then they did diagonal step to row11 col4, then final diagonal to B at row12 col3? Actually B is at row12 col3, not part of path. The path includes G at row11 col4, then B at row12 col3 (no G). So they didn't place G on B cell. So path stops one step ... [10166 chars truncated]
"A fault line propagates between two tectonic stress points — it ruptures straight through homogeneous rock where pressure is unidirectional, then fractures diagonally through the shear zone to reach the second stress point."
120b: k=2
See: Two stress concentrations of different mineral signature sit in a uniform rock bed.
Do: Propagate a fault between them. Near one stress point, the rupture follows a straight line where one principal stress dominates; it then shifts to a diagonal shear path to connect with the other. The exposed fault plane reveals a new mineral color; both stress points retain their signatures.
Grid: The dark rock matrix is the background. The two colored pixels are tectonic stress points. Green cells are the exposed fault surface.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input has two colored points: one B (blue) and one R (red). Output adds green line connecting them? Let's examine Example1: Input grid 15x15. B at (row13, col4?) Let's index rows starting 0. Input shows B at row12 (0-index) line: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's row12 (13th row). R at row1 col6? Row1 line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." That's row1 col6 (0-index). Output: R unchanged, B unchanged. Green cells (G) form a path: Starting near R? In output, G column at col5? Let's see output rows: Row2 (index2) has G at col5? Output row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." That's row2 col5 (0-index). Row3 same, etc. It continues downwards until row11 (index11) where G at col5. Then row12 (index12) has G at col4? Actually output row12: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's row12 col3? Wait row12 line: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's col3 (0-index). So path goes vertical down from just right of R? Let's map coordinates: R at (1,6). B at (12,3). Path: Starting at (2,5) (row2 col5) then continues down same column col5 until row11 (row11 col5). Then at row12, path shifts left to col3? Actually row12 col3 is G, but also there is B at col3 same row? Wait B at row12 col3 (0-index). In output row12: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at col3, B also at col3? But B is at same location; output row12 also has B unchanged at col3. However row12 line shows ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." in input. Output row12 line: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait they replaced B with G? Actually output row12 line: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." According to given output: row12 (index12) is ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . .". And row13 (index13) is ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . .". So B moved down one row? Let's verify: Output rows list: Row0: all . Row1: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row3: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row4: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row7: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row10: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Row11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." Row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So B moved from row12 to row12? Actually original B at row12 col3 (0-index). In output B still at row12 col3 (same). Wait row12 line shows ". . . B ..." yes B at col3. Row11 has G at col4 (since ". . . . G ...") That's column4 (0-index). So path goes from (2,5) down to (10,5) then at row11 column4, then continues? Actually after row11, there is no more G; B at row12 col3. So path goes diagonal from (10,5) to (11,4) to (12,3) which is B location? But B remains B, not G. So path ends adjacent to B? Actually diagonal line connects to B's location? In example, the diagonal segment ends at cell directly above ... [10246 chars truncated]
"A crack spreads through a sheet of caramel cooling on marble — it runs straight where the sugar is thinnest, then angles sharply toward the stress point where a seed crystal sits."
120b: fail
See: Two crystallization points of different character sit embedded in a smooth caramel sheet.
Do: Let a fracture propagate between them. Where the sheet is uniformly thin, the crack runs straight; where thickness varies, it jags diagonally. The fracture line shows the exposed marble beneath.
Grid: The dark sheet is the caramel surface. The two colored dots are impurities or seed points. The green line is the exposed substrate visible through the crack.
We need to infer rule. From examples, we have black background '.' (black). Two colored points: B (blue) and R (red). Output adds green line G connecting them? Let's examine. Example1: Input has R at (row1? Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14). Input: R at row1 col6 (0-index). B at row12 col3. Output: green vertical line from row2 to row11 at column5? Wait output shows G at column5? Let's map. Output rows: row0 all ., row1 same R at (1,6). Row2 has G at column5? Actually row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." So G at col5 (0-index). Row3 same col5, etc down to row11. Row12: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait row12 output: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Actually given: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Let's check: In example1 output row12: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait they show row12: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." but original row12 had B at col3. In output row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." So B unchanged. The G line seems to go from just below R downwards leftwards? Let's examine coordinates. R at (1,6). B at (12,3). The green line appears to be a diagonal? Actually output shows G at column5 rows 2-11 (vertical line). Then at row12, G at column3? Wait row12 output shows G at column3? Let's recount: Row12 output line: ". . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ." That would be col3 (0-index). But B is at col3 as well, but B remains B, not overwritten. Actually row12 output line: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." So there is B at col3, not G. So where is G at row12? Let's look at given output for example1: Rows (I'll copy): 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1: . . . . . . R . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 3: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 5: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 10: . . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . 11: . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . . 12: . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . 13: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . So G appears at column5 rows2-10 (vertical line). Then at row11, G at column3 (col3). So the line goes down vertically then turns left (diagonal?) Actually from (2,5) down to (10,5) then at (11,3) which is two columns left and one row down? That's a diagonal shift? Let's compute path from R (1,6) to B (12,3). The line seems to start adjacent to R? R at (1,6). G at (2,5) which is down-left diagonal from R. Then continues downwards (south) at column5 until row10. Then at row11, moves left to column3 (down-left diagonal again?) Actually from (10,5) to (11,3) is down-left two columns. That's a diagonal of slope -2? Not consistent. Maybe the rule: draw a line of G connecting the two points using Manhattan moves: first go vertically/horizontally then diagonally? Let's examine other examples. Example2: Input R at (1,1). B at (13,8). Output: G forms a diagonal line from near R down-right to B ... [11217 chars truncated]
"A glissando connects two notes in different registers — it slides steadily through the scale where the interval is pure, then bends chromatically where the tonality shifts."
120b: k=2
See: Two notes of different timbres sit silently on an empty staff.
Do: Play a glissando between them. The passage holds a straight portamento where one dimension dominates, then slants through both pitch and time simultaneously as it approaches the resolving note. The glissando shimmers in a new color; the anchor notes keep their own voices.
Grid: The blank staff is the black background. Each colored pixel is a note. The green cells are the sounding glissando passage.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with black background '.' and some colored anchor notes: red R and blue B. Output adds green G path connecting them? Let's examine Example1. Input size 15x15. There is a red at (row1-index? Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14). Input shows R at row1 (second row) column6? Let's count: row1: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." So column6 (0-index). Blue B at row12 (13th row) column3? Row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." So column3. So red above left of blue? Actually red column6, row1; blue column3, row12. So red is higher (row1) and to the right (col6) relative to blue (row12, col3). Output adds green cells forming a path from red downwards then leftwards? Let's see output: green G appears from row2 col5? Actually output rows: Row0 unchanged. Row1 unchanged (R). Row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." => column5? Wait count: columns 0-4 '.' then column5 G? Actually there is a G at column5 (0-index). Row2 col5. Row3 same, row4 same, row5 same, row6 same, row7 same, row8 same, row9 same, row10 same. Row11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." => column4? Wait row11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." So column4 G. Row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." unchanged. So green forms a vertical line from row2 to row10 at column5, then at row11 column4 (shift left one). So path goes down from just below red (which is at row1 col6) moving downwards one column left? Actually red at (1,6). The green starts at (2,5) which is down one row and left one column (diagonal). Then continues straight down column5 until row10 (row10 col5). Then at row11 it shifts left to column4 (down one row left one column). Then stops before blue at (12,3). So path is like a glissando: first dominant dimension (vertical) then slants through both pitch and time simultaneously as it approaches the resolving note. So they go down vertically then diagonal to reach blue. Thus rule: draw a line of G from just after the first anchor (R) towards the second anchor (B) using a path that first moves primarily in one direction (vertical or horizontal) then at the end moves diagonally to meet B? Let's examine Example2. Example2 input size 15x12? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns. Red at row1 col1? Row1: ". R . . . . . . . . . ." So column1. Blue B at row13 col8? Row13: ". . . . . . . . B . . ." So column8. So red is above left of blue (row1 col1) vs (13,8). Output: green path appears as diagonal? Let's list output rows with G positions: Row0 unchanged. Row1 unchanged (R). Row2: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." => column2. Row3: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." column2. Row4: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." column2. Row5: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." column2. Row6: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." column2. Row7: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." column2. Row8: ". . . G . . . . . . . ." column3. Row9: ". . . . G . . . . . . ." column4. Row10: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." column5. Row11: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." column6. Row12: ". . . . . . . G . . . ." column7. Row13 unchanged ... [11490 chars truncated]
"A relay runner receives the baton and sprints down the straightaway before cutting diagonally across the infield to reach the next handoff zone."
120b: fail
See: Two relay stations of different team colors are positioned on an empty field.
Do: Trace the runner's path between stations. Near one station, the runner charges in a straight line; as the geometry demands, the runner cuts diagonally toward the other station. The footprints mark the grass in a third color; both stations remain as they were.
Grid: The dark field is the playing surface. The two colored pixels are relay stations. Green cells are the runner's footprint trail.
We need to infer rule. From examples, we have two colored stations: one B (blue) and one R (red). Output adds green G cells forming a path between them, like a line that goes vertically then diagonally? Let's examine example1.
Input grid 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 15 columns. B at (row13, col4) (0-index? Let's use 0-index rows). R at (row2, col7). Output: G cells from just below R downwards vertically in same column? Let's see output: G at (row2? Actually row2 is index 2? Let's list coordinates.
Rows 0-14.
Input example1:
Row1 (index0) all .
Row2 (index1) has R at col6? Wait row1: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." So column index 6 (0-based). Row12 (index12) has B at col3 (". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . .").
Output: G cells appear forming a diagonal from near R downwards to B? Let's list output G positions:
Row2 (index1) unchanged R.
Row3 (index2): G at col5? Actually output row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." So col5 (0-based). Row3 (index3): same col5. Row4 (index4): same col5. Row5 (index5): same col5. Row6 (index6): same col5. Row7 (index7): same col5. Row8 (index8): same col5. Row9 (index9): same col5. Row10 (index10): same col5. Row11 (index11): same col5. Row12 (index12): G at col4? Actually row12 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." So col4. Row13 (index13) B unchanged. So path: Starting from just below R, go straight down (same column) for many rows, then at row12 shift left one column (col5->col4) and then stop before B? B is at col3 row12? Wait B at row12 index12 col3. The G at row12 col4 is adjacent to B horizontally? Actually B at col3, G at col4 (right next). So path goes down column 5 (col5) from row2 to row11, then at row12 moves left one column to col4, ending adjacent to B. So path is like L-shaped: vertical then horizontal left one step.
Example2: Input 15x12? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns. R at (row1, col1). B at (row13, col8). Output: G forms a diagonal? Let's list.
Output rows:
Row0 all .
Row1: R unchanged at col1.
Row2: G at col2? Actually row2 output: ". . G . . . . . . . . ." So col2.
Row3: G at col2.
Row4: G at col2.
Row5: G at col2.
Row6: G at col2.
Row7: G at col2.
Row8: ". . . G . . . . . . . ." G at col3.
Row9: ". . . . G . . . . . . ." G at col4.
Row10: ". . . . . G . . . . . ." G at col5.
Row11: ". . . . . . G . . . . ." G at col6.
Row12: ". . . . . . . G . . . ." G at col7.
Row13: B at col8 unchanged.
So path: Starting from just below R? R at row1 col1. G starts at row2 col2 (down-right diagonal). Then continues vertical? Actually from row2 to row7, G stays at col2 (same column). That's vertical down column 2 (col2). Then at row8, G moves right to col3 (diagonal). Then continues moving right each row until reaching col7 at row12, then B at col8 row13. So path: vertical down from just below R (but shifted one column right) then diagonal down-right to B.
Example3: Input 16x15? Actually 16 rows, 15 columns. R at row13 col3 (0-index). B at row1 col11. Output: G forms a diagonal from B to R? Let's see.
... [11107 chars truncated]
"A bolt of lightning leaps between two charged regions of a thundercloud — it plunges straight where the voltage gradient is steepest, then forks sideways where the field disperses."
120b: fail
See: Two charged pockets of different polarity float in a dark storm cell.
Do: Discharge a bolt between them. The leader channel drops vertically (or runs horizontally) where one dimension of separation dominates, then zigzags diagonally to close the remaining gap. The plasma channel glows differently from both charge centers.
Grid: The black grid is the storm interior. The two colored pixels are charge centers. Green cells are the luminous discharge channel.
We need to infer rule. Example: Input grid 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 15 columns. Input has a red pixel at (row2, col7?) Let's index rows starting 0. Input example1: row1 (0-index) has R at column6? Let's count: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." That's 6 dots then R then rest. So column6 (0-index). Also a blue B at row12 (index12) column3? ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's column3. Output adds green G forming a vertical line from just below R downwards to near B, then a diagonal? Let's see output: G at (row2,col5?) Actually output row2 (index2) has G at column5? Row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." That's column5. Row3 same column5. Continue down to row10 column5. Row11 has G at column4? Row11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's column4. Then row12 has B unchanged at column3. So the green path goes vertically down from just below R (R at (1,6)). It goes down column5? Wait R at col6, G at col5 (one left). So vertical line at col5 from row2 to row10. Then at row11, it shifts left one column to col4 (diagonal). Then stops before B at col3 row12. So path is like: start from R, move vertically towards B if vertical distance > horizontal distance? The description: leader channel drops vertically (or runs horizontally) where one dimension of separation dominates, then zigzags diagonally to close remaining gap. So we have two charge centers: R and B. Need to draw a green path connecting them: first go straight in dominant direction (vertical if vertical distance > horizontal distance). Then after reaching same row as B? Actually they go vertical until one row above B? Then diagonal steps to reach B? In example, R at (1,6), B at (12,3). Δrow = 11, Δcol = -3. Absolute vertical > horizontal, so go vertical first. They moved vertical downwards at column5 (one left of R). Why column5 not column6? Possibly they offset to avoid overlapping with R? The path should be adjacent (orthogonal) to both? Maybe they start from a cell adjacent to R, not on R. The green channel glows differently from both charge centers, so not overlapping them. So start from a neighbor of R in direction of B? B is down-left. So direction vector (-3, +11). The primary direction is down. So they move down from a cell adjacent to R that is one step towards B horizontally? That would be left of R (col5). So they start at (2,5) (row2 col5) which is down-left from R (R at (1,6)). Then continue vertical down column5 until row10. At row10 col5, they are still above B (row12 col3). Now remaining offset: need to go down-left diagonally to reach B's neighbor? They go diagonal: row11 col4 (down-left). Then stop before B (row12 col3). So they didn't place green on B cell. So path ends adjacent to B? Actually they stop at row11 col4, which is one up and one right of B? B at (12,3). Adjacent cells: (11,3), (13,3), (12,2), (12,4). They placed at (11,4) which is diagonal adjacent (NE) to B. That's not orthogonal adjacency. But maybe they stop when next diagonal step would ... [7389 chars truncated]
"A flying buttress connects a tower to a nave wall — it extends straight outward where structural load demands a column, then arches diagonally to meet the wall at its stress point."
120b: k=2
See: Two structural anchors of different stone sit in an empty cathedral cross-section.
Do: Build a buttress between them. One segment runs straight to bear the primary load near one anchor; the remaining span angles diagonally to distribute force toward the other. The buttress stone differs from both anchors.
Grid: The dark void is the cathedral interior. The two colored pixels are structural anchor points. The green cells are the buttress masonry.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with two anchor colors: B (blue) and R (red). Output adds green G cells forming a buttress shape connecting them. The description: "One segment runs straight to bear the primary load near one anchor; the remaining span angles diagonally to distribute force toward the other." Observations Example1: Input size 15x15. B at (row12, col4) (0-index? Let's use row index starting 0). R at (row1, col6). Output: G column at col5 (0-index?) Actually look: In output, G cells from row2 to row11 at column5 (0-index?). Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-14, cols 0-14. Input1: R at row1 col6 (since row1 line: ". . . . . . R . ...", that's col6). B at row12 col3 (since row12 line: ". . . B . . . ...", col3). Output: G appears at column5? Let's check row2 (index2) line: ". . . . . G . . ..." So G at col5. Row3 also col5, etc. Row11 line: ". . . . G . . ..." Actually row11 line: ". . . . G . . . ..." Wait row11 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's col4? Let's count: row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". So G at col4 (0-index). Hmm maybe shift. Let's write out rows with indices: Row0: all . Row1: R at col6. Row2: G at col5. Row3: G at col5. Row4: G at col5. Row5: G at col5. Row6: G at col5. Row7: G at col5. Row8: G at col5. Row9: G at col5. Row10: G at col5. Row11: G at col4? Wait row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . .". That's col4. Row12: B at col3. Rows13-14: all . So pattern: Starting from just below R (row2) vertical line of G downwards, staying at column5 (one left of R's column? R col6, G col5). Continue down until row10 (just above row11). At row11, the vertical line shifts left one column (to col4) and then continues diagonally down-left to B at row12 col3? Actually row12 B at col3, row11 G at col4, row12 B at col3. So diagonal segment from row11 col4 to row12 col3 (down-left). So shape: vertical segment from just below R down to one row above B, then diagonal segment to B. Thus rule: Connect R to B with a path of G that first goes vertically (or maybe horizontally) then diagonally? Let's examine Example2. Example2 grid size 15x15? Actually 15 rows, 12 columns? Let's count: Input lines have 12 columns. R at row1 col1 (since line ". R . . . . . . . . . ."). B at row13 col8 (since row13 line ". . . . . . . . B . . ."). Output: G cells form a path: Starting at row2 col2? Let's see output row2: ". . G . . . . . . . . .". That's col2. Row3: same col2. Row4: same col2. Row5: same col2. Row6: same col2. Row7: same col2. Row8: same col2. Row9: ". . . G . . . . . . . .": col3. Row10: ". . . . G . . . . . . .": col4. Row11: ". . . . . G . . . . . .": col5. Row12: ". . . . . . G . . . . .": col6. Row13: ". . . . . . . G . . . .": col7. Row14: B at col8 unchanged. So path: Starting from just below R (row2) at column2 (one right of R's column? R col1, G col2). Continue vertical down column2 until row8 (row8 index). At row8, shift right one column to col3 (diagonal). Then conti ... [9811 chars truncated]
"A sapper digs a trench from the siege line toward the fortress gate — tunneling straight where the ground is soft, then angling the approach trench diagonally where defenders' fire forces a zigzag."
120b: fail
See: Two fortified positions of different allegiance occupy a dark no-man's-land.
Do: Excavate a sap between them. Near one position, the trench runs straight for efficiency; as the geometry shifts, it angles diagonally to cover the remaining distance. The excavated earth shows a new color; both positions stand unchanged.
Grid: The black field is no-man's-land. The two colored pixels are military positions. Green cells mark the excavated trench.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has a blue B at (row12 col4?) Let's index rows 0-14, columns 0-14. Input example1: B at row12 col3 (0-index). R at row1 col6. Output: R unchanged, B unchanged. Green G cells form a vertical line from row2 to row11 at column5? Let's see: Output shows G at column5 (0-index?) Actually output rows: row2 (index2) has G at col5? Input row2 originally all .; output row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." So column5 (0-index) = 5? Let's count: positions: columns 0-14. The G appears at column5 (the 6th position). Row2 col5. Row3 col5, ... up to row10 col5. Row11 has G at col4? Wait row11 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's column4. So the line goes vertical from row2 to row10 at col5, then at row11 shifts left one column to col4. That seems like a diagonal segment connecting to B? Let's locate B at row12 col3. The trench should connect B and R? R at row1 col6. So trench starts near one position runs straight then angles diagonally to cover remaining distance. In output, trench (green) starts near R? R at (1,6). The trench starts at row2 col5 (just below and left of R). Then goes straight down (vertical) until row10 col5, then diagonal left-down to reach B at (12,3). Indeed from (10,5) to (11,4) to (12,3) would be diagonal. But output only shows G at (11,4) but not at (12,3) because that's B. So trench stops before B, not overwriting B. So rule: draw a path of G from just adjacent to one colored pixel (maybe the one that is "higher" or "north"?). Path goes straight (vertical or horizontal) then diagonal to reach the other pixel, not overwriting either endpoint. Which endpoint is start? "Near one position, the trench runs straight for efficiency; as the geometry shifts, it angles diagonally to cover the remaining distance." So start near one position (maybe the one that is higher (north) or leftmost?). In example, R is north of B. So trench starts adjacent to R (just below-left?) Actually R at (1,6). Adjacent cell chosen is (2,5) which is down-left diagonal from R. That's not directly below. Why that? Maybe trench must be orthogonal then diagonal: first vertical down from row2 col5 (same column as R-1?). Wait column of R is 6. The trench column is 5, which is one left. So maybe trench starts at cell directly below R but shifted left to avoid overlapping? Not sure. Let's compute vector from R to B: R (1,6) to B (12,3). Δrow = +11, Δcol = -3. To connect, you could go vertical down 11 then left 3. But they did vertical down 9 (from row2 to row10) then diagonal down-left twice (row11 col4, row12 col3 would be B). Actually they did vertical down 9 (rows 2-10 inclusive =9 rows) then diagonal down-left twice? Wait from (10,5) to (11,4) is diagonal, then next would be (12,3) B. So they used one diagonal step, not two. That covers remaining Δcol -1 and Δrow +1. But still need Δcol -2 and Δrow +? Actually after vertical to row10, we are at (10,5). Need to get to (12,3): Δrow + ... [12469 chars truncated]
"A spotlight follows an actor crossing a darkened stage — the beam tracks in a straight line during the monologue, then sweeps diagonally as the actor moves toward their scene partner for the climactic exchange."
120b: fail
See: Two performers under differently colored spotlights stand on a dark stage.
Do: Trace the path of a follow-spot from one performer toward the other. The light sweeps straight where the blocking calls for a direct cross, then arcs diagonally to cover the remaining distance. The light trail glows in its own hue; each performer retains their original spotlight color.
Grid: The dark grid is the unlit stage. The two colored pixels are spotlit performers. Green cells are the traced path of the follow-spot.
We need to infer rule. Example: Input has R at (row1? let's index 0-based). Input grid 15x16? Actually given 15 rows? Let's count: Example input lines: appears 15 rows of 16 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 16 columns. Number of rows: list shows 15 rows? Let's count: lines from Input: row0 to row14? Actually there are 15 lines. Yes 15 rows, 16 columns. Positions: R at row1 col6? Let's index rows 0-14, cols 0-15. Row1: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." So col6 = R. B at row12 col3? Row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." So col3 = B. Output: R stays same. B stays same. Green G forms a path from R to B? Let's see output G cells: many G in column5? Actually output shows G at rows2-11 col5? Let's examine output lines: Row0 all . Row1 same as input: R at col6. Row2: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." => G at col5. Row3 same G at col5. Rows4-11 same G at col5. Row12: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." => G at col4? Wait row12 output: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's col4 = G. Row13: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." B unchanged at col3. Rows14-... all . (row14 empty) So path: Starting from R at (1,6). Then vertical downwards? Actually G column5 (col5) from row2 to row11. That's directly below R? R at col6, row1. The path goes down one row to row2 col5 (diagonal left-down). Then continues straight down column5 until row11. Then at row12, G at col4 (diagonal left-down again) to reach near B at (12,3). Then B at (12,3). So path is like a "L" shape with a diagonal at start and end? Let's think: The description: "Trace the path of a follow-spot from one performer toward the other. The light sweeps straight where the blocking calls for a direct cross, then arcs diagonally to cover the remaining distance." Might be: draw a line from R to B using Manhattan moves: first move diagonally (down-left) until aligned column? Actually from (1,6) to (12,3). Difference: rows +11, cols -3. Could draw path: first move down-left diagonally 3 steps to align column? That would go to (4,3). Then move straight down to (12,3). But output shows diagonal only at start (one step) and at end (one step). Not matching. Let's map actual path: Starting at R (1,6). G at (2,5) (down-left). Then continue down column5 until row11 (11,5). Then at row12, G at (12,4) (down-left). Then B at (12,3). So path goes down column5, then one more diagonal to column4 at same row as B, then B left one more column. So pattern: The path is a vertical line in column between the two points, offset by one column left of R? R col6, path column5 (Rcol-1). B col3, path ends at row of B but column4 (Bcol+1). So path is vertical line connecting rows between the two points, at column = min(Rcol, Bcol)+? Actually Rcol=6, Bcol=3. Path column = 5 which is between them? It's Rcol-1 =5, also Bcol+2? Bcol+2=5. So column = (Rcol + Bcol)/? Not average (4.5). So maybe rule: draw vertical line at column = max(Rcol, Bcol) -1? That's 6-1=5. Works. Then also draw diag ... [11712 chars truncated]
"A vine reaches from one trellis post to another — it climbs straight up where the post provides support, then sends tendrils diagonally through open air to grasp the distant post."
120b: fail
See: Two trellis posts of different wood stain stand in a bare garden bed.
Do: Train a vine between them. The growth runs straight along whichever axis offers the longer unsupported span near one post, then angles diagonally through the remaining distance to reach the other. New growth shows green; the posts keep their stain.
Grid: The dark soil is the background. The two colored pixels are trellis posts. Green cells are the vine growth.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has two colored pixels: R at (row1? Let's index 0-based). Input grid 15x15? Actually example 1 input shows 15 rows, 15 columns. R at row1 col6? Let's count: row index 1 (second row) column 6 (0-based). B at row12 col3 (13th row, 4th column). Output shows green line connecting them: vertical line from R downwards? Let's see output: R stays same at same position. B stays same. Green cells appear from row2 col6 down to row10 col6 (vertical). Then at row11 col5? Actually output row11 (index 10) shows G at col5? Let's examine output rows: Row0 all . Row1: ... R at col6 (same) Row2: ... G at col6 Row3: ... G at col6 Row4: ... G at col6 Row5: ... G at col6 Row6: ... G at col6 Row7: ... G at col6 Row8: ... G at col6 Row9: ... G at col6 Row10: ... G at col6 Row11: row index 11: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." So G at col4? Wait row11 shows G at column4 (0-based). Actually row11 line: ". . . . G . . . . . . . . . . ." That's col4. Then row12: ". . . B . . . . . . . . . . . ." B unchanged at col3. So after vertical line reaches row10 (index10) col6, then diagonal goes down-left to reach B at row12 col3. Let's compute: Starting from R at (1,6). The longer unsupported span near one post: Determine axis with longer distance? Distance horizontally between columns: |6-3|=3. Vertical distance: |1-12|=11. So vertical longer. So growth runs straight along vertical axis from R downwards (since B is below). It goes until the row where diagonal can connect to B. The diagonal path from that point to B is a straight line at 45 degrees? Let's see: From point (10,6) to B (12,3) difference: dr=2, dc=-3. Not equal magnitude, not 45 deg. But they used diagonal steps? Actually they placed G at (11,4) then B at (12,3). That's a diagonal down-left each step moves row+1 col-1. Starting from (10,6) to (11,5) would be down-left, but they placed at (11,4). Wait they skipped (11,5). Let's map coordinates: Indices: Row0 0 Row1 1: R at col6 Row2 2: G at col6 Row3 3: G col6 Row4 4: G col6 Row5 5: G col6 Row6 6: G col6 Row7 7: G col6 Row8 8: G col6 Row9 9: G col6 Row10 10: G col6 Row11 11: G col4 Row12 12: B col3 So after vertical line ends at row10 col6, then diagonal goes to row11 col5? but they placed at col4. So they moved two columns left in one step? Actually maybe they start diagonal earlier: maybe they go from row9 col6 to row10 col5 to row11 col4 to row12 col3. But output shows G at row10 col6 (vertical), row11 col4 (diagonal), missing row10 col5 and row9 col5 etc. Let's double-check output row10 (index10) line: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." That's col5? Wait row10 line: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." Counting: positions 0-4 are ., position5 is G, position6 is . So G at col5 (0-based). Actually earlier rows had G at col5? Let's recount row2 line: ". . . . . G . . . . . . . . . ." That's also col5. So maybe column index is 5 not 6. Let's recount original R column: Input row1 line: ". . . . . . R . . . . . . . . ." So R at co ... [11977 chars truncated]
See: The input grid is divided into two regions: an upper region filled entirely with a single background color, and a lower region containing a multi-colored pattern anchored to the bottom of the grid. The pattern region consists of the bottommost rows that contain at least one non-background color. The background color is the color that fills the upper region completely.
Do: 1. Identify the background color: the color that fills the top rows uniformly. 2. Identify the pattern: the contiguous block of rows at the bottom of the grid that contain non-background pixels. Call this block P, with P[0] being the topmost pattern row and P[n-1] being the bottommost. 3. Count the number of blank rows above the pattern (rows filled entirely with the background color). 4. Fill the blank rows by tiling the pattern upward, cycling through the pattern rows in reverse. Starting from the blank row immediately above the pattern, assign it the last row of P, the next blank row up gets the second-to-last row of P, and so on. When you exhaust the pattern rows, wrap around and continue from the last row of P again. 5. Keep the original pattern rows in place at the bottom.
Grid: The grid dimensions vary across instances. The width and height are not fixed. The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The pattern occupies the bottom portion and the remaining rows above are filled by tiling the pattern upward with wraparound.
"A reflection pool mirrors what stands at its edge, rippling upward into the sky."
120b: k=2
See: A quiet, empty expanse of still water stretches across the upper portion of the world. At the shore along the bottom edge, a colorful monument stands — a small sculptural arrangement of vivid tiles rising from the earth. The water above is perfectly calm, showing nothing yet, waiting to be disturbed.
Do: The monument at the water's edge gazes down into the pool and sees its own reflection climbing upward through the stillness. The reflection doesn't simply mirror once — it keeps echoing, like a stone's ripple that never fades. The monument's image scrolls upward through the water, its bottom reaching up first, then its middle, then its top, and when the whole shape has appeared, it begins again from the bottom, endlessly tiling its echo toward the horizon. The original monument never moves — it remains planted at the shore while its ghost fills every empty inch of sky-water above.
Grid: The world varies in size but the shore is always at the bottom. The still water is one uniform color. The monument is the cluster of living colors rooted to the bottom edge. After the reflection, every row of water has been claimed by the monument's upward echo, and the world is the same size as before.
We need to infer rule. From description: bottom edge contains monument (colored cluster). Water is uniform color (single color) above. The output fills water rows with repeated upward scrolling of monument pattern. Look at Example1. Input grid 10 rows? Let's count: lines: X X X X X (row1) ... up to row10? Actually there are 10 rows: rows 1-5 all X, row6: X R R R X, row7: X X R X X, row8: X A A X X, row9: X X A A X, row10: X X A X X. So bottom rows (6-10) contain colored pattern (R and A) forming a shape. The water color is X (grey). The monument is the cluster of non-X colors at bottom edge (rows 6-10). The output: rows 1-5 now contain the pattern repeated upward, shifting? Output rows: first row is X R R R X (which was row6 originally). second row X X R X X (row7). third row X A A X X (row8). fourth row X X A A X (row9). fifth row X X A X X (row10). Then rows 6-10 repeat same pattern again (same as rows1-5). So essentially the pattern of bottom 5 rows is tiled vertically to fill entire grid, preserving order. So the water region (originally rows1-5) is replaced by repeating the monument pattern upward, starting from bottom pattern's first row (closest to water) placed at topmost water row, then continue upward, then after reaching top, continue again? Wait we have 5 water rows, pattern height =5 (rows6-10). They tiled exactly once. If water rows > pattern height, they'd repeat multiple times. Example2: Input grid 10 rows, 7 columns. Water color is G (green). Bottom rows (7-10) contain pattern with W and R colors. Let's list rows 1-6 all G. Row7: G G G W R W G Row8: G G G R W R G Row9: G G G W W W G Row10: G G G G W G G So pattern height =4 rows (rows7-10). Output: rows1-10 show pattern tiled? Let's see output rows: Row1: G G G W W W G Row2: G G G G W G G Row3: G G G W R W G Row4: G G G R W R G Row5: G G G W W W G Row6: G G G G W G G Row7: G G G W R W G Row8: G G G R W R G Row9: G G G W W W G Row10: G G G G W G G We can see pattern of 4 rows appears repeated twice (rows1-4 then rows5-8 then rows9-10? Actually pattern of 4 rows repeated twice gives 8 rows, but we have 10 rows. Let's examine pattern sequence: original pattern rows7-10 are: A: W R W B: R W R C: W W W D: G W G (but note row10 has G G G G W G G? Wait row10 input: G G G G W G G. That's pattern row D: G W G with extra G at start? Actually pattern includes the surrounding G columns (since monument is only colored tiles not G). In input, the whole row is G G G G W G G (so only one W tile at column5). So pattern rows include the background G as water? Wait water color is G, but monument includes colored tiles (W,R) on top of G background? In example1, water color X, but monument rows also have X background with colored R/A. So the pattern includes the background color as part of rows. So the pattern is the entire rows (including water color) of bottom region. Thus pattern rows are exactly rows7-10 as given. Output rows1-4 correspond to rows9-10? Let's map: Output row1: G G G W W ... [9326 chars truncated]
"A cell's DNA unfurls upward from its nucleus, replicating its coiled sequence into the empty cytoplasm above until every space carries the organism's signature."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cell body rests at the base of a vacant cytoplasm, its genetic material compressed into a few layered strands of colored code.
Do: The genetic strands replicate upward from the nucleus, each new copy faithfully reproducing the sequence in reverse reading order, wrapping around when the code is exhausted, until the entire cell is saturated with genetic material.
Grid: The grid dimensions remain unchanged. The base pattern stays anchored and the empty rows above are overwritten with the cycling replication.
"A constellation anchored near the horizon casts its light upward through the dark, each band of sky catching the star pattern in reverse as it tiles toward the zenith."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small constellation of colored stars sits in the lowest rows of a uniform night sky.
Do: The starlight propagates upward, each empty band of sky receiving the constellation's rows in reverse order, wrapping through the pattern as needed until every band from horizon to zenith is illuminated.
Grid: The sky's dimensions remain fixed. The original constellation stays near the horizon; the dark bands above fill with the tiling star pattern.
"Coral formations on the seabed send their colors rippling upward through the water column, each wave crest carrying the reef's layers in reverse until the surface shimmers with the pattern below."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A colorful reef structure occupies the lowest rows of a deep, uniformly colored water column.
Do: The reef's coloration ripples upward through the empty water, each new depth band receiving the reef layers in reverse order, cycling through the formation until the entire column from floor to surface is filled.
Grid: The water column's dimensions stay the same. The reef at the bottom is preserved; empty water above fills with the cycling reef pattern.
"A signal pattern is loaded into the lowest registers of a shift buffer; the clock pulses it upward through the empty banks, each cycle reading the pattern backward until every register is charged."
120b: k=2
See: A sequence of colored voltage levels occupies the bottom registers of an otherwise zeroed-out buffer array.
Do: On each clock tick the signal propagates upward one bank, filling registers in reverse order of the source pattern, wrapping around when the sequence is exhausted, until all banks hold data.
Grid: The buffer dimensions are unchanged. The source registers at the bottom retain their values; the empty banks above are filled with the cycling signal.
We need to understand transformation. From description: bottom registers hold pattern, propagate upward one bank each tick, filling registers in reverse order of source pattern, wrapping around when sequence exhausted, until all banks hold data. Essentially we take bottom rows (source pattern) and copy them upward, but reversed order? Let's examine examples. Example1 input grid size? 10 rows, 5 columns. Bottom rows (last rows) contain pattern: rows 6-10? Let's list rows index 0 top. Rows: 0: X X X X X 1: X X X X X 2: X X X X X 3: X X X X X 4: X X X X X 5: X R R R X 6: X X R X X 7: X A A X X 8: X X A A X 9: X X A X X Output rows: 0: X R R R X 1: X X R X X 2: X A A X X 3: X X A A X 4: X X A X X 5: X R R R X 6: X X R X X 7: X A A X X 8: X X A A X 9: X X A X X So output is basically the bottom 5 rows (rows5-9) repeated upward to fill top rows, but shifted? Actually output rows0-4 are same as rows5-9 (the pattern). Then rows5-9 same as original rows5-9 (unchanged). So they duplicated pattern upward by one "bank"? Wait original bottom pattern occupies rows5-9 (5 rows). After transformation, pattern occupies rows0-9 (all rows). But the topmost copy is same as original bottom-most? Let's see order: original bottom pattern rows5-9 in order: row5: X R R R X, row6: X X R X X, row7: X A A X X, row8: X X A A X, row9: X X A X X. Output rows0-4: same order as rows5-9. So they just copied the block upward, not reversed. But description said reverse order of source pattern? maybe not. Check Example2. Input size 10 rows, 7 columns. Bottom rows (rows6-9) contain pattern? Let's list rows: 0-5 all G. Row6: G G G W R W G Row7: G G G R W R G Row8: G G G W W W G Row9: G G G G W G G Output rows: 0: G G G W W W G 1: G G G G W G G 2: G G G W R W G 3: G G G R W R G 4: G G G W W W G 5: G G G G W G G 6: G G G W R W G 7: G G G R W R G 8: G G G W W W G 9: G G G G W G G So output rows0-5 are pattern rows6-9 but in some order: Let's list original pattern rows6-9 order: 6: W R W 7: R W R 8: W W W 9: G W G (but with leading G G G). Actually row9: G G G G W G G. Now output rows0-5: 0: row8 (W W W) 1: row9 (G W G) 2: row6 (W R W) 3: row7 (R W R) 4: row8 (W W W) 5: row9 (G W G) So pattern repeated twice? Actually we have 4 rows pattern, and output top 6 rows consist of pattern repeated with some offset? Let's see pattern length = 4 rows. Output top 6 rows = pattern rows 8,9,6,7,8,9. That's like starting from row8 (third row of pattern), then row9, then wrap to start row6,7, then again row8,9. So they are shifting upward by 2 rows? The original bottom pattern occupies rows6-9. After transformation, the pattern is shifted upward such that the bottom rows (6-9) remain same, and the rows above are filled with the pattern cyclically, but starting from the row that is two rows above bottom? Wait. In Example1, pattern length 5 rows. Output top rows0-4 are rows5-9 (starting at row5). That's same as original bottom pattern start. So shift offset 0. In Example2, pattern length 4 ... [6157 chars truncated]
"An inscription at the base of a monolith chants itself upward into the blank stone, each verse carved in reverse order, the incantation looping until the entire pillar bears the sacred text."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored runes are carved into the bottommost rows of a tall, featureless monolith.
Do: The inscription propagates upward from the runes, each empty row of stone receiving the next verse in reverse order of the original text, cycling through the verses until the pillar is fully engraved.
Grid: The monolith's dimensions are preserved. The base inscription remains; the blank stone above fills with the cycling runic pattern.
"Dancers in the back row hold a formation; their choreography cascades forward through the empty floor, each wave of movement reversing through the formation's steps until the whole stage pulses in unison."
120b: k=2
See: A compact arrangement of colored dancers occupies the rearmost rows of an empty dance floor.
Do: The choreography flows forward row by row, each empty position receiving the formation in reverse row order, cycling through the full routine when it's exhausted, until every row of the floor is dancing.
Grid: The dance floor retains its dimensions. The rear formation stays in place; the empty rows in front fill with the cycling choreographic pattern.
We need to infer rule. From description: "compact arrangement of colored dancers occupies the rearmost rows of an empty dance floor. choreography flows forward row by row, each empty position receiving the formation in reverse row order, cycling through the full routine when it's exhausted, until every row of the floor is dancing. Grid retains dimensions. The rear formation stays in place; the empty rows in front fill with the cycling choreographic pattern." Interpretation: Input grid has some rows at bottom containing a pattern (non-empty) while top rows are all same filler (maybe X or G etc). Output moves that pattern upward? Let's examine Example1. Input size 10x5? Actually rows: 11 rows? Let's count: lines: X X X X X (row1) repeated 5? Actually list: first 5 rows all X. Then row6: X R R R X. Row7: X X R X X. Row8: X A A X X. Row9: X X A A X. Row10: X X A X X. That's total 10 rows? Wait count: rows 1-5 = X rows (5). Row6-10 = pattern rows (5). So total 10 rows. Output: rows appear to be pattern rows repeated? Output rows: first row X R R R X (which was row6 originally). Then row2 X X R X X (row7). Row3 X A A X X (row8). Row4 X X A A X (row9). Row5 X X A X X (row10). Row6 X R R R X (row6 again). Row7 X X R X X (row7). Row8 X A A X X (row8). Row9 X X A A X (row9). Row10 X X A X X (row10). So output is just pattern rows duplicated to fill all rows, preserving order, but starting from top with pattern rows (original bottom rows) and then repeating pattern rows again to fill remaining rows. Essentially the top empty rows are filled with the pattern rows in reverse row order? Wait they said "reverse row order". Let's see: original pattern rows order from top to bottom (row6 to row10) is: R row, then X R X, then A A, then X A A, then X A. Output top rows: first row is X R R R X (same as row6). That's not reverse; it's same order. But description says each empty position receiving the formation in reverse row order, cycling through full routine when exhausted. Let's test: The empty rows were rows1-5 (all X). They get filled with pattern rows in reverse order? Reverse of pattern rows (row10,9,8,7,6) would be: X X A X X, X X A A X, X A A X X, X X R X X, X R R R X. But output top rows are not that; they are forward order. So maybe they consider "reverse row order" meaning we take pattern rows from bottom to top and place them into empty rows from top to bottom? That would be reverse order indeed: bottommost pattern row (row10) goes to topmost empty row (row1). But output row1 is row6 not row10. So not. Let's examine Example2. Input size 10x7? rows: first 6 rows all G. Row7: G G G W R W G. Row8: G G G R W R G. Row9: G G G W W W G. Row10: G G G G W G G. So pattern rows are rows7-10 (4 rows). Output rows: row1: G G G W W W G (which was row9). Row2: G G G G W G G (row10). Row3: G G G W R W G (row7). Row4: G G G R W R G (row8). Row5: G G G W W W G (row9). Row6: G G G G W G G (row10). Row7: G G G W R W G (row7). Row8: G G G R W R G (row8). Row9: G G G W W ... [11865 chars truncated]
"A stratum of mineral veins lies deep in the bedrock; tectonic pressure pushes replicas of those layers upward through the blank stone, each thrust reversing through the vein sequence until the cliff face is fully banded."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored mineral bands occupy the deepest rows of an otherwise uniform rock column.
Do: The mineral layers are thrust upward through the empty rock, each new stratum receiving the vein pattern in reverse order, cycling through the sequence until the entire column from base to surface is layered.
Grid: The rock column dimensions remain fixed. The original mineral beds stay at the base; the blank rock above fills with the cycling vein pattern.
"A chef's mise en place sits at the bottom of the pan; as the heat rises, the layers of flavor climb upward, repeating their seasoning in waves until the whole dish is infused."
120b: k=2
See: A shallow layer of ingredients rests at the bottom of an otherwise empty vessel, each row a different stratum of spice and color.
Do: The flavors rise from the bottom, each layer depositing itself above in reverse order—topmost ingredient last, bottommost first—cycling through the recipe until every empty layer of the vessel carries taste.
Grid: The vessel keeps its original size. The ingredient layers at the bottom remain; the empty space above fills with repeated cycles of the ingredient rows, laid down from bottom-up in reversed order.
We need to infer rule. From description: bottom rows are ingredient layers, each row a different stratum. The flavors rise from bottom, each layer depositing itself above in reverse order—topmost ingredient last, bottommost first—cycling through the recipe until every empty layer of the vessel carries taste. Interpretation: Input grid has some bottom rows containing non-background colors (ingredients). The rest of rows above are empty (maybe X or some placeholder). The output should fill the empty rows with repeated cycles of those ingredient rows, placed from bottom up, reversed order. Let's examine Example1. Input grid size 10x5? Actually 10 rows, 5 columns. Let's list rows from top (row0) to bottom (row9). Input: Row0: X X X X X 1: X X X X X 2: X X X X X 3: X X X X X 4: X X X X X 5: X R R R X 6: X X R X X 7: X A A X X 8: X X A A X 9: X X A X X So bottom rows (maybe rows 5-9) contain colors R and A. The top rows 0-4 are all X (grey). Output: Row0: X R R R X 1: X X R X X 2: X A A X X 3: X X A A X 4: X X A X X 5: X R R R X 6: X X R X X 7: X A A X X 8: X X A A X 9: X X A X X So output has same pattern repeated twice: the block of rows 5-9 (the ingredient rows) appears at rows 0-4 and again at rows5-9. So the empty rows (top 5) were filled with a copy of the ingredient block, but reversed order? Wait the description says reverse order: "each layer depositing itself above in reverse order—topmost ingredient last, bottommost first". Let's see: The ingredient block original order from row5 to row9 (top to bottom within block) is: 5: X R R R X (call pattern1) 6: X X R X X (pattern2) 7: X A A X X (pattern3) 8: X X A A X (pattern4) 9: X X A X X (pattern5) Now reversed order would be pattern5,4,3,2,1. But output rows 0-4 are pattern1,2,3,4,5 (same order). So not reversed. However maybe they consider bottommost ingredient first (i.e., when filling upward, you start with bottommost row and place it at the lowest empty row, then next above etc). Since we fill from bottom up, the bottommost ingredient row ends up at the topmost empty row? Let's simulate: empty rows are rows0-4. Fill from bottom up: start with bottommost ingredient row (row9 pattern5) placed at row4 (lowest empty). Then next ingredient row up (row8 pattern4) placed at row3, etc. That would produce rows0-4 as pattern1? Let's compute: bottommost ingredient row pattern5 goes to row4, pattern4 to row3, pattern3 to row2, pattern2 to row1, pattern1 to row0. So rows0-4 become pattern1,2,3,4,5 (same order as original). So indeed the rule: copy the block of ingredient rows (the contiguous non-empty rows at bottom) and stack them above, preserving order, by filling empty rows from bottom up with the block reversed (i.e., bottommost ingredient row goes to highest empty row). Equivalent to repeating the block upward. Thus output is just the original grid with the top empty rows replaced by a copy of the bottom block, repeated as many times as needed to fill all rows. Since ther ... [6897 chars truncated]
"A bass riff sits low on the staff, and the echo chamber above repeats its phrase upward, each iteration a faithful inversion rolling back through the motif until the silence is filled with sound."
120b: k=2
See: A short musical phrase occupies the lowest lines of an otherwise silent score, its notes colored in distinct timbres.
Do: The phrase echoes upward into the rests above, playing back from its last note to its first, then looping again, stacking echoes until no silence remains on the staff.
Grid: The score's length and width are unchanged. The original phrase holds its position at the bottom while echoes fill the blank measures above.
We need to infer rule. From description: phrase at bottom rows, echoes upward, playing back from its last note to its first, then looping again, stacking echoes until no silence remains. So we have bottom pattern (non-grey? Actually X is grey, used as background). In example1, input grid 10x5? Actually 10 rows, 5 columns. Bottom rows contain pattern of R and A etc. Let's view input1 rows from top to bottom: Row1: X X X X X 2: X X X X X 3: X X X X X 4: X X X X X 5: X X X X X 6: X R R R X 7: X X R X X 8: X A A X X 9: X X A A X 10: X X A X X So bottom region rows6-10 contain pattern. Output moves that pattern upward to fill all rows, replicating with reversed order? Let's see output rows (10 rows): 1: X R R R X 2: X X R X X 3: X A A X X 4: X X A A X 5: X X A X X 6: X R R R X 7: X X R X X 8: X A A X X 9: X X A A X 10: X X A X X So output is just the bottom 5 rows repeated upward to fill top rows, preserving order. Actually bottom pattern of 5 rows (rows6-10) repeated twice to fill 10 rows. No reversal. But description said echo playing back from last note to first. However maybe the phrase is reversed when echoing? Let's examine example2. Input2 grid 10 rows, 7 columns. Let's list rows: 1: G G G G G G G 2: G G G G G G G 3: G G G G G G G 4: G G G G G G G 5: G G G G G G G 6: G G G G G G G 7: G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G Bottom region rows7-10 contain pattern. Let's extract rows7-10: 7: G G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G Output rows (10 rows): 1: G G G W W W G 2: G G G G W G G 3: G G G W R W G 4: G G G R W R G 5: G G G W W W G 6: G G G G W G G 7: G G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G So output top rows are rows9,10 then rows7,8,9,10,7,8,9,10? Let's see pattern: The bottom 4 rows repeated but with some shift? Actually output rows 3-6 correspond to original rows7-10 in same order. Output rows 7-10 also same as rows7-10. Output rows1-2 are rows9-10 (the last two rows of pattern) but not rows7-8. So pattern repeated upward but starting from the last two rows? Let's examine: pattern length = 4 rows. Output total rows = 10. Need to fill top 6 rows with echoes. The phrase echoes upward playing back from its last note to its first, then looping again. So maybe we take the bottom pattern and generate a repeating sequence that goes forward then backward? Let's think: phrase at bottom (rows7-10). Echo upward: first echo is reversed (last to first) placed directly above bottom? In example1, bottom pattern length 5, output top rows (1-5) are same as bottom rows (6-10) not reversed. So maybe reversal not applied because pattern symmetrical? Let's check pattern: rows6-10: RRR, X R X, A A, X A A, X A X. Not symmetric. If reversed order would be rows10,9,8,7,6: X A X, X A A, A A, X R X, RRR. That's not what output shows. So no reversal. But description says "playing back from its last note to its first". Could refer to horizontal reversal within each row? Let's test ... [9931 chars truncated]
"The starting lineup is posted on the bottom of the scoreboard; as the crowd's roar swells, the roster stamps itself upward through the empty tiers of the stadium."
120b: fail
See: A few rows of colored jerseys are assembled at the base of a monochrome stadium seating chart.
Do: The roster replicates upward tier by tier, reading backward through the lineup each cycle, wrapping around when it reaches the last player, until every seat displays a jersey.
Grid: The stadium dimensions stay the same. Original lineup remains at the bottom; empty tiers above are filled with the cycling roster pattern.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input grid 10x5? Actually shown as 10 rows, 5 columns. Input bottom rows contain pattern: rows 6-10 have colors R, A etc. The top 5 rows are all X (grey). Output moves the bottom pattern upward? Let's list input rows from top (row1) to bottom (row10): 1 X X X X X 2 X X X X X 3 X X X X X 4 X X X X X 5 X X X X X 6 X R R R X 7 X X R X X 8 X A A X X 9 X X A A X 10 X X A X X Output rows: 1 X R R R X 2 X X R X X 3 X A A X X 4 X X A A X 5 X X A X X 6 X R R R X 7 X X R X X 8 X A A X X 9 X X A A X 10 X X A X X So the bottom 5 rows (rows6-10) are repeated upward to rows1-5, preserving order? Actually output rows1-5 equal input rows6-10. Then rows6-10 equal same as rows6-10 (unchanged). So pattern duplicated upward by copying the bottom block (size equal to number of non-X rows?) The bottom block is 5 rows (rows6-10). The top empty rows (X) count also 5. So they filled with the same pattern. But description: "roster replicates upward tier by tier, reading backward through the lineup each cycle, wrapping around when it reaches the last player, until every seat displays a jersey." Hmm maybe more complex for other cases. But only one example. The pattern seems to be: take the non-empty rows at bottom (containing colors other than X) and repeat them upward to fill the X rows, preserving order (maybe same orientation). If there were more empty rows than pattern rows, would wrap? The description says reading backward through the lineup each cycle, wrapping around when it reaches the last player. That suggests maybe they fill upward by taking rows from bottom upward, but reading backward (i.e., reverse order) each cycle? Let's test: bottom block rows6-10 order: row6: X R R R X, row7: X X R X X, row8: X A A X X, row9: X X A A X, row10: X X A X X. Output rows1-5 are exactly same order as rows6-10, not reversed. So not backward. Maybe "reading backward through the lineup each cycle" refers to reading the roster backward (i.e., from last row to first) when filling upward? But they filled top rows with same order as bottom, which is forward relative to bottom to top? Actually when filling upward, you start from bottommost non-empty row (row10) and go upward? Let's simulate: empty rows above (rows1-5). If you read roster backward (starting from last row of roster, which is row10: X X A X X) and place it at row1, then row2 gets row9, etc. That would produce reversed order. Not matching. Thus maybe the description is metaphorical but actual rule is simple copy bottom block upward. Now test input: 10 rows, 5 columns. Let's list rows: 1 O O O O O 2 O O O O O 3 O O O O O 4 O O O O O 5 O O O O O 6 O O O O O 7 O M O M O 8 M O R O M 9 O R M R O 10 O M O M O We need to identify bottom block of non-X? Here there is no X; all rows have colors O, M, R. But maybe the "empty" rows are those that are uniform? In example, empty rows were all X (grey). Here there is no X, but maybe the "original lineup remains at the bottom; empty tiers above ... [2849 chars truncated]
"Storm clouds gather at the ground and their banded layers of pressure and color surge upward through the atmosphere, each altitude echoing the pattern below in rolling repetition."
120b: fig alone solves
See: At the base of a calm, uniform sky, a compact formation of colored cloud bands has settled.
Do: The cloud bands propagate upward through the empty atmosphere, each new altitude receiving the next band in reverse sequence, cycling back through the formation endlessly until the sky is full.
Grid: The sky retains its original dimensions. The ground-level clouds persist while the vacant atmosphere above fills with the repeating banded cycle.
"The foundation of a tower holds an ornate frieze; as the building rises, the mason lays each course by reading the frieze backward, returning to its end whenever the pattern is spent."
120b: k=2
See: A decorated foundation band sits at the base of an unfinished tower, its rows of colored stonework forming a compact design against a plain wall.
Do: The mason builds upward from just above the frieze, laying stone courses that mirror the frieze rows in reverse order, wrapping back to the bottom of the frieze sequence each time it's exhausted, until the tower is complete.
Grid: The tower's footprint and height remain unchanged. The frieze stays at the base and the bare wall above is filled with the cycling masonry.
We need to understand the transformation. The description: "decorated foundation band sits at the base of an unfinished tower, its rows of colored stonework forming a compact design against a plain wall. The mason builds upward from just above the frieze, laying stone courses that mirror the frieze rows in reverse order, wrapping back to the bottom of the frieze sequence each time it's exhausted, until the tower is complete. Grid details: The tower's footprint and height remain unchanged. The frieze stays at the base and the bare wall above is filled with the cycling masonry." Interpretation: Input grid has a "frieze" at bottom rows? In examples, we see bottom part contains colored pattern, above is uniform X or G etc. Output moves that pattern upward? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 10x5? Actually 10 rows, 5 columns. Let's list rows (top to bottom). Input rows: 1: X X X X X 2: X X X X X 3: X X X X X 4: X X X X X 5: X X X X X 6: X R R R X 7: X X R X X 8: X A A X X 9: X X A A X 10: X X A X X So bottom 5 rows (6-10) contain pattern: row6: X R R R X ; row7: X X R X X ; row8: X A A X X ; row9: X X A A X ; row10: X X A X X. Output rows (10 rows): 1: X R R R X 2: X X R X X 3: X A A X X 4: X X A A X 5: X X A X X 6: X R R R X 7: X X R X X 8: X A A X X 9: X X A A X 10: X X A X X So output is just the bottom 5 rows repeated upward to fill the whole grid, preserving order? Actually output rows 1-5 are same as rows6-10 (the frieze). Then rows6-10 are same as rows6-10 again (original). So they duplicated the frieze pattern to fill the top empty rows, but also kept original frieze at bottom unchanged. The rule: take the "frieze" rows (the non-uniform rows at bottom) and copy them upward, repeating cyclically if needed, until the whole grid is filled. In this case, there were 5 frieze rows, and 5 empty rows above, so just copy once. Now Example2: Input grid 10 rows, 7 columns. Rows: 1: G G G G G G G 2: G G G G G G G 3: G G G G G G G 4: G G G G G G G 5: G G G G G G G 6: G G G G G G G 7: G G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G So bottom rows 7-10 contain pattern (non-uniform). The top rows 1-6 are uniform G. Output rows: 1: G G G W W W G 2: G G G G W G G 3: G G G W R W G 4: G G G R W R G 5: G G G W W W G 6: G G G G W G G 7: G G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G Let's see: The frieze rows (7-10) are: 7: G G G W R W G 8: G G G R W R G 9: G G G W W W G 10: G G G G W G G Now output top rows (1-6) are: row1 = row9? Actually row1 = G G G W W W G (that's row9). Row2 = G G G G W G G (row10). Row3 = G G G W R W G (row7). Row4 = G G G R W R G (row8). Row5 = G G G W W W G (row9 again). Row6 = G G G G W G G (row10 again). So they repeated the frieze rows in reverse order? Let's examine: The description says "mirror the frieze rows in reverse order, wrapping back to the bottom of the frieze sequence each time it's exhausted". Mirror reverse order: Starting from just above the frieze (i.e., row6), we plac ... [5195 chars truncated]
"A regiment is dug in at the base of a hill; as reinforcements arrive, they stack into the empty terrain above, each wave a mirror-march of the original formation cycling through its ranks."
120b: k=2
See: A compact formation of colored battalions occupies the lowest rows of an empty battlefield grid.
Do: Reinforcements fill the empty ground above, deploying rank by rank in the reverse order of the original formation, looping back through the ranks when all have been placed, until the field is full.
Grid: The battlefield dimensions are preserved. The original regiment holds position while the empty terrain above fills with cycling deployments.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grid has some pattern at bottom rows, rest empty (X or G). Output moves that bottom pattern upward? Let's examine Example1. Input size 10x5? Actually rows: 11 rows? Let's count: lines: X X X X X (row1) ... up to row10? Wait list: there are 10 rows? Let's count: rows given: 1 X X X X X 2 X X X X X 3 X X X X X 4 X X X X X 5 X X X X X 6 X R R R X 7 X X R X X 8 X A A X X 9 X X A A X 10 X X A X X That's 10 rows, 5 columns. Output rows also 10 rows. Output appears to have the bottom 5 rows same as input bottom 5 rows? Let's compare. Input bottom 5 rows (rows6-10): 6 X R R R X 7 X X R X X 8 X A A X X 9 X X A A X 10 X X A X X Output rows1-5 are exactly those rows (same order). Output rows6-10 are same as rows6-10? Let's see output rows6-10: 6 X R R R X 7 X X R X X 8 X A A X X 9 X X A A X 10 X X A X X Yes output rows6-10 identical to input rows6-10. So output is just input shifted upward by 5 rows? Actually the top 5 rows of output are the original rows6-10, and bottom 5 rows are same as rows6-10 again (duplicate). So they duplicated the bottom pattern to fill the whole grid, preserving original bottom pattern in place, and filling above with same pattern repeated in same order. Thus rule: take the non-empty region at bottom (the "formation") and copy it upward repeatedly until grid full, preserving original at bottom. In Example1, the formation occupies rows6-10 (5 rows). The empty rows above are rows1-5 (all X). Output fills those with the formation rows in same order (topmost gets row6, then row7, etc). Since number of empty rows equals formation height, just one copy. Example2: Input size? Let's count rows: 10 rows, 7 columns. Rows1-6 are all G (green). Row7: G G G W R W G Row8: G G G R W R G Row9: G G G W W W G Row10: G G G G W G G So formation is rows7-10 (4 rows). Empty rows above are rows1-6 (all G). Output rows1-4 become rows7-10? Let's see output rows: Row1: G G G W W W G (that's input row9) Row2: G G G G W G G (input row10) Row3: G G G W R W G (input row7) Row4: G G G R W R G (input row8) Row5: G G G W W W G (row9) Row6: G G G G W G G (row10) Row7: G G G W R W G (row7) Row8: G G G R W R G (row8) Row9: G G G W W W G (row9) Row10: G G G G W G G (row10) So they repeated the formation rows (7-10) in order, but starting from row9? Wait order: The sequence in output rows1-4 is 9,10,7,8. That's not same order as original (7,8,9,10). Let's examine pattern: They said "reinforcements fill the empty ground above, deploying rank by rank in the reverse order of the original formation, looping back through the ranks when all have been placed". So reverse order of original formation: original formation rows order from top to bottom: 7,8,9,10. Reverse order would be 10,9,8,7. But output top rows are 9,10,7,8. Not matching. Maybe they treat formation as a stack and fill from bottom upward? Let's think: The empty rows are above. They fill rank by rank in reverse order of original formation, looping back ... [5186 chars truncated]
"The actors take their marks downstage; the mirror-curtain behind them multiplies their blocking upward into the wings, each reflection unspooling the scene in reverse until every fly bar carries a frozen tableau."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stage arrangement of costumed figures in distinct colors occupies the bottom rows, the rest of the stage an empty backdrop.
Do: The blocking pattern projects upward from the actors' positions, each row of empty stage receiving the next line of the arrangement in reverse, cycling through the full tableau until the entire stage is populated.
Grid: Stage dimensions are unchanged. The downstage positions remain and the empty upstage fills with repeated, reversed cycles of the blocking.
"Seeds planted in the lowest furrows sprout upward row by row, each new growth ring echoing the planting pattern in reverse until the entire bed blooms from soil to sky."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A patch of colored plantings occupies the bottom furrows of an otherwise bare garden bed.
Do: Growth pushes upward from the topmost planted row, each new row of shoots mirroring the plantings in reverse sequence, cycling back through the seed pattern when it runs out, until the bed is fully covered.
Grid: The garden bed keeps its original dimensions. The planted furrows at the bottom persist; empty rows above fill with the cycling growth pattern.
See: The grid is divided into two rectangular regions by background color: one region filled with A (azure) and one region filled with B (blue). The two regions share a boundary and together tile the entire grid (they may be side-by-side or stacked). Scattered within each region are one or more R (red) shapes — contiguous rectangular blocks of red cells.
Do: For each region, determine which edge of the region is the boundary shared with the other region, and which edge is the outer (non-shared) edge. Slide every R shape within that region horizontally or vertically — away from the shared boundary and toward the outer edge of its region — until the shape touches the outer edge. Each R shape preserves its size, orientation, and row/column position along the axis perpendicular to the slide direction. Specifically: if the two regions are stacked vertically, R shapes slide horizontally — in the A region they slide to the left edge, in the B region they slide to the right edge. If the regions are side by side, R shapes slide horizontally toward the far edge of their own region (away from the boundary between A and B). The background cells vacated by each shape return to the region's background color.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The two background regions (A and B) remain in exactly the same positions. Only the R (red) cells move; no cells change color except by R cells vacating old positions (restored to background) and occupying new positions.
"Magnets repel — red pieces flee from the border like opposite poles pushing apart."
120b: k=1
See: The grid is a world split into two kingdoms — one azure, one blue — sharing a tense border. Scattered across each kingdom are red refugees, huddled in small rectangular groups, caught between the contested frontier and the distant outer walls of their homeland.
Do: The border between the kingdoms is electrified, radiating a repulsive force. Every red group feels the push and flees from the shared border, sliding straight toward the farthest wall of its own kingdom until it presses flat against the outer edge. They keep their shape and their lane — they don't drift sideways, only retreat as far from the charged border as their kingdom's walls allow.
Grid: The two kingdoms hold their ground — azure stays azure, blue stays blue. Only the red refugees move, and the ground they abandon heals back to the local kingdom's color. The world's dimensions never change.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: two kingdoms azure (A) and blue (B) share a border. Red groups are rectangular groups (clusters) that are between the border and outer walls. They slide away from the border toward the farthest wall of its own kingdom, keeping shape, moving straight (presumably orthogonal direction) until they hit outer edge. The ground they leave becomes the kingdom's color (A or B). So basically, for each contiguous rectangular block of R that lies within a region of A or B, we need to move it away from the border between A and B, i.e., towards the outer edge of that region. We need to identify the border: the line separating A and B. In the grid, A and B are separate contiguous regions? In example, the top part is A rows, bottom part B rows. The border is a horizontal line between them. Indeed example input: first 8 rows are A, then rows 9-12 are B. So border is between row 8 and 9 (horizontal). Red groups appear in both kingdoms: some in A region (rows 3-4, columns 3-4 etc) and some in B region (rows 6-7, columns 6-8 etc). They slide away from border: For A region (above border), they move upward (toward top edge). For B region (below border), they move downward (toward bottom edge). They keep shape and column positions? Actually they slide straight (vertical) while staying in same columns (lane). So they shift vertically until they hit the outer edge (top row for A, bottom row for B). The output shows that. Let's verify with example: Input A region rows 1-8 (0-index?). Red block at rows3-4 (0-index maybe 2-3) columns3-4 (2-3). In output, those Rs moved to rows1-2? Actually output shows rows3-4 become A, rows1-2 become R? Let's examine output lines: Output rows (1-index): 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A A A A A A A A A A 3: R R A A A A A A A A A 4: R R A A A A A A A A A 5: A A A A A A A A A A A 6: R R R A A A A A A A A 7: R R R A A A A A A A A 8: A A A A A A A A A A A 9: B B B B B B B B B B B 10: B B B B B B B B B R R 11: B B B B B B B B B R R 12: B B B B B B B B B B R Let's map original red blocks: Block1: rows3-4 cols3-4 (2x2). In output they moved to rows3-4? Wait they are now at rows3-4 cols1-2 (shifted left?). Actually output shows R at rows3-4 cols1-2. That's not vertical shift; it's horizontal shift leftwards. Hmm maybe border is vertical? Let's examine original grid more: Input rows: Rows 1-8 are A region. Row1: A A A A A A A A A A A Row2: same Row3: A A R R A A A A A A A Row4: A A R R A A A A A A A Row5: A A A A A A A A A A A Row6: A A A A A R R R A A A Row7: A A A A A R R R A A A Row8: A A A A A A A A A A A Rows9-12 are B region. So there are two red blocks in A region: a 2x2 at (row3-4, col3-4) and a 2x3 at (row6-7, col6-8). In output, the first block moved to rows3-4 col1-2 (shift left). The second block moved to rows6-7 col1-3 (shift left). So they moved leftwards, not up. So border must be vertical between A and B? But A region is left side? Wait A region is top part, B bottom. However th ... [8704 chars truncated]
"Two tissues share a membrane. Red antibodies within each tissue detect the foreign neighbor and migrate to the far wall of their own cell, as far from the membrane as possible — an immune response pushing threats to the periphery."
120b: k=2
See: Two living tissues (azure and blue) pressed together along a shared membrane, with red antibodies scattered inside each.
Do: Each antibody retreats from the shared membrane, sliding through its own tissue until it lodges against the outermost wall, preserving its shape and lane.
Grid: Same dimensions. Tissue colors unchanged. Red shapes relocate to the far edge of their tissue, vacated positions heal to background color.
We need to infer rule. From description: two tissues azure (A) and blue (B) pressed together along a shared membrane, with red antibodies scattered inside each. Each antibody retreats from the shared membrane, sliding through its own tissue until it lodges against the outermost wall, preserving its shape and lane. Vacated positions become background (tissue color? Actually "heal to background color". In examples, background is tissue color? Let's examine. Example1 input: top part A region (azure) rows 0-7? Actually grid 12 rows, 11 columns. Rows 0-7 have A and R. Rows 8-11 have B and R. The shared membrane is the boundary between A and B rows: row 7 is A, row8 is B. Red clusters inside each tissue: In A region, there is a 2x2 block at rows2-3 cols2-3 (0-index). Also a 2x3 block at rows5-6 cols5-6? Actually rows5-6 have R R R at cols5-6-7? Input shows row5: A A A A A R R R A A A (col5-7). So shape is 2x3 rectangle. In output, these red shapes have moved downwards (away from membrane) to bottom of A region? Let's see output: rows2-3 now have R R at cols0-1 (moved left?). Wait output rows2: R R A A ... So the 2x2 block moved to leftmost columns (col0-1) not downwards. Actually they moved towards outermost wall of their tissue: For A region, outermost wall is left side? The membrane is between A and B horizontally? Actually A region is top part, B bottom. Shared membrane is horizontal line between row7 and row8. So "retreat from shared membrane" means move away from that line, i.e., upward for A region, downward for B region. But the 2x2 block moved upward? It was at rows2-3 originally, which is already away from membrane (which is at row7). In output it moved to rows2-3 still, but columns changed to leftmost. So maybe "outermost wall" refers to leftmost or rightmost side? Let's examine shape movement: In A region, the 2x2 block originally at columns2-3, rows2-3. Output at columns0-1, same rows. So moved leftwards to left edge. The 2x3 block originally at rows5-6, cols5-7. Output at rows5-6, cols0-2 (left edge). So indeed they moved horizontally to left edge, not vertical. So the "shared membrane" might be vertical boundary between A and B tissues (i.e., columns?). Let's check layout: In input, rows0-7 have A region left side? Actually columns? Let's view grid: 11 columns. The top 8 rows have A and R, bottom 4 rows have B and R. So the tissues are separated horizontally? No they are separated vertically? Wait rows0-7 are A region, rows8-11 are B region. So membrane is horizontal line. Then "outermost wall" for A region would be top edge (row0). But red shapes moved left, not up. So maybe orientation is swapped: A region is left side, B region right side? Let's examine columns: In input rows0-7, there are A's across entire row (no B). So A region occupies whole width. In rows8-11, there are B across entire width. So indeed tissues are stacked vertically. So outermost wall for A region could be leftmost? But leftmost is also outermost wall (edge). How ... [11664 chars truncated]
"Two nebulae press against each other in deep space. Red star clusters within each nebula experience tidal forces that fling them outward — away from the contact zone and toward the cold outer rim of their own nebula."
120b: k=1
See: Two nebulae (azure and blue) meeting at a boundary, with red star clusters scattered within each.
Do: Tidal forces push each star cluster away from the contact boundary toward the outer rim of its nebula, preserving cluster shape and perpendicular position.
Grid: Space dimensions unchanged. Nebula colors intact. Red clusters at the outer rims.
We need to infer rule. From description: two nebulae (azure and blue) meeting at a boundary, with red star clusters scattered within each. Tidal forces push each star cluster away from the contact boundary toward the outer rim of its nebula, preserving cluster shape and perpendicular position. So we have two regions of different colors (A azure and B blue) meeting at a boundary line. Red clusters inside each region are moved outward away from the boundary, preserving shape and perpendicular distance? Let's examine example. Input grid dimensions? Example 1 input appears 12 rows? Let's count rows: lines given: Row1: A A A A A A A A A A A (11 columns) Row2 same (11) Row3: A A R R A A A A A A A Row4 same Row5: A A A A A A A A A A A Row6: A A A A A R R R A A A Row7 same Row8: A A A A A A A A A A A Row9: B B B B B B B B B B B Row10: B B B R R B B B B B B Row11 same Row12: B B B B B B B B R B B Output grid same dimensions. We need to see transformation. Let's map coordinates. Let's define rows 1-12, cols 1-11. Region A (azure) appears rows 1-8 (top). Region B (blue) rows 9-12 (bottom). Boundary between them is between row8 and row9 (horizontal). Red clusters within each region: In A region, there are two clusters: a 2x2 block at rows3-4 cols3-4 (R). Another cluster: a 3x2? Actually rows6-7 cols6-8 (R R R) shape 2 rows x3 columns. In B region, there are clusters: rows10-11 cols4-5 (2x2 block). Also a single R at row12 col9. Now output: Let's see where reds moved. Output rows 1-8 (A region) after transformation: rows1-2 unchanged (all A). Row3 output: R R A A A A A A A A A (so the 2x2 block moved up? originally at rows3-4 cols3-4. Now appears at rows3-4 cols1-2? Actually row3 output has R at cols1-2. Row4 same. So block shifted leftwards (toward outer rim of A region). Outer rim of A region is top? Wait A region is top part, outer rim away from boundary (which is bottom of A region). So moving away from boundary means moving upward (north) not left. But shift is leftwards. Let's examine orientation: boundary between A and B is horizontal, so direction away from boundary for A region is upward (north). However the block moved leftwards (west). Maybe boundary is vertical? Let's examine grid: maybe A region is left side, B region right side? But rows show A rows top, B rows bottom. However there is also B region maybe left side? Let's examine columns: In input, rows9-12 are B rows across entire width. So B region is bottom block. So boundary is horizontal. So moving away from boundary for B region would be downwards (south). For A region upward. But the 2x2 block moved leftwards, not upward. Let's check maybe they moved away from the contact boundary (the line where colors meet) along the perpendicular direction to the boundary (i.e., vertical). But they also preserve perpendicular position? Wait "preserving cluster shape and perpendicular position." Means they keep same distance from boundary? Actually they push each star cluster away from the conta ... [9963 chars truncated]
"Two ocean currents — one azure, one blue — flow side by side. Red buoys caught in each current are carried by the diverging flow away from the current boundary, washing ashore on the far coast of their own current."
120b: k=1
See: Two parallel currents (azure and blue) meeting at a boundary, with red buoys floating in each.
Do: Each buoy drifts away from the current boundary toward the far shore of its own current, maintaining its position along the boundary axis.
Grid: Ocean layout unchanged. Current colors intact. Red buoys beached on far shores.
We need to infer rule. From description: Two parallel currents (azure and blue) meeting at a boundary, with red buoys floating in each. Each buoy drifts away from the current boundary toward the far shore of its own current, maintaining its position along the boundary axis. So we have two colored regions (azure A and blue B) adjacent, with a boundary line between them. Red R cells are within each region near the boundary. In output, red cells move away from boundary deeper into their region, preserving same column (or row) coordinate? Let's examine example. Input grid 12x11? Actually rows: 12 rows, 11 columns. Let's map. I'll index rows 0-11, cols 0-10. Input rows: 0: A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A R R A A A A A A A 3: A A R R A A A A A A A 4: A A A A A A A A A A A 5: A A A A A R R R A A A 6: A A A A A R R R A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A 8: B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B R R B B B B B B 10: B B B R R B B B B B B 11: B B B B B B B B R B B Output rows: 0: A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: R R A A A A A A A A A 3: R R A A A A A A A A A 4: A A A A A A A A A A A 5: R R R A A A A A A A A 6: R R R A A A A A A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A 8: B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B B B B B B B R R 10: B B B B B B B B B R R 11: B B B B B B B B B B R Let's see region separation: Azure A rows 0-7? Actually rows 0-7 are A region (azure). Blue B rows 8-11 are B region. Boundary between row 7 and 8 (horizontal). Red buoys in A region near boundary: In input, there are red blocks at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (a 2x2 block) and rows5-6 columns5-7 (3x2? Actually rows5-6 columns5-7 are R R R). Those are near top? Not near boundary row7. Wait boundary is between row7 and row8. The red blocks are not near boundary; they are somewhere inside azure region. But output shows they moved downwards (toward row8) i.e., away from boundary? Actually description says each buoy drifts away from the current boundary toward the far shore of its own current, maintaining its position along the boundary axis. So they should move away from boundary (i.e., deeper into region). For azure region, far shore is top (row0) if boundary is bottom? Wait azure region is above boundary (rows0-7). The far shore would be opposite side of boundary, i.e., top side (row0). So moving away from boundary means moving upward (decreasing row index). In output, the red block originally at rows2-3 columns2-3 moved to rows2-3? Actually they moved to rows2-3 columns0-1? Let's compare. Input red block at (2,2)(2,3)(3,2)(3,3). Output red at (2,0)(2,1)(3,0)(3,1). So they shifted left by 2 columns, not up/down. Hmm maybe boundary is vertical between azure and blue? Actually azure region left side? Let's examine grid: azure region is left side? In input, azure A appears in left side? Actually rows have A across all columns, not just left side. So azure region is whole top part. Blue region bottom part. So boundary is horizontal. Then "maintaining its position along the boundary axi ... [8942 chars truncated]
"Two circuit board regions share a bus line. Red components in each region experience a voltage differential that pushes them along their traces — away from the shared bus toward the board's outer edge connectors."
120b: k=1
See: A circuit board divided into two regions (azure and blue) by a shared bus, with red components mounted in each region.
Do: Voltage differential slides each component along its trace away from the bus toward the outer edge connector of its region, preserving component footprint and trace lane.
Grid: Board layout unchanged. Region colors intact. Red components at outer edge connectors.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 12x11? Actually example input lines: first line "A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 11 columns, 12 rows. Output same size. We have two regions: azure (A) top region, blue (B) bottom region, separated by a shared bus? In input, there is a horizontal line of maybe bus? Let's examine example input: rows 0-3 have A region, rows 4-7 also A? Actually rows 0-3 are A rows, row4 all A, row5-6 have A with R block, row7 all A. Then rows8-11 are B region. So bus maybe the line where A and B meet? In example, the boundary between A and B is between row7 and row8 (row index). The red components are in each region: there are red 2x2 block at rows2-3 columns2-3 (0-index). Another red 2x3 block at rows5-6 columns5-7. In B region, there is red 2x2 block at rows9-10 columns3-4? Actually rows9-10 have "B B B R R B B B B B B". That's columns3-4 (0-index). Also a single red at row11 column8? row11: "B B B B B B B B R B B" column8. Output: In A region, the red blocks have moved leftwards? Let's compare. Original red block at rows2-3 columns2-3 moved to columns0-1? Output rows2-3 columns0-1 are R R, rest A. Yes moved leftwards to edge (outer edge connector) of region (left side). The other red block at rows5-6 columns5-7 (size 2x3) moved to columns0-2? Output rows5-6 columns0-2 are R R R. Yes moved leftwards to left edge, preserving shape (2x3). So they slide leftwards until they hit region boundary (leftmost column). Similarly B region: red block at rows9-10 columns3-4 moved to right edge? Output rows9-10 columns9-10 are R R (since width 11). Indeed they moved rightwards to rightmost columns. The single red at row11 column8 moved to column10 (rightmost). So in B region they slide rightwards (away from bus) to outer edge (right side). So bus is the shared border between regions (horizontal line). For top region (A) they move leftwards (west), for bottom region (B) they move rightwards (east). So rule: For each region, shift all red cells in that region horizontally towards the outer edge of that region, preserving relative positions (i.e., maintain shape and orientation) and not overlapping other colors (but there are only reds). They slide until they hit region boundary. Now test input: grid size? Provided lines: 9 rows, each with 9 columns? Let's count: first line "B B B B B B B B B" 9 columns. So 9x9 grid. Rows0-3 are B region? Actually top rows are B (blue). Then rows4-8 are A (azure). So bus is between row3 and row4 (horizontal). So top region B will shift reds to right edge. Bottom region A will shift reds to left edge. Now locate reds in each region. Input rows: Row0: B B B B B B B B B (no R) Row1: B B R R B B B B B -> reds at columns2,3 (0-index) Row2: B B B B B R B B B -> red at column5 Row3: B B B B B B B B B (no R) Row4: A A A A A A A A A (no R) Row5: A A A A R R A A A -> reds at columns4,5 Row6: A A A A R R A A A -> same columns4,5 Row7: A R A A A A A A A -> red at column1 Row8: A A A A A A A A ... [3086 chars truncated]
"Two rival gods rule adjacent realms. Red spirits summoned in each realm are banished by divine decree — exiled to the outermost boundary of their god's domain, as far from the contested border as the realm allows."
120b: k=1
See: Two divine realms (azure and blue) sharing a contested border, with red spirits inhabiting each realm.
Do: Each spirit is banished outward from the border to the far edge of its own realm, gliding in a straight path while keeping its form and lateral position.
Grid: Realm dimensions unchanged. Domain colors intact. Red spirits at the far edges.
We need to infer rule. From description: two realms azure (A) and blue (B) sharing a contested border, with red spirits inhabiting each realm. Each spirit is banished outward from the border to the far edge of its own realm, gliding in a straight path while keeping its form and lateral position. So we have two colored regions: azure (A) top? In example, input grid: first rows A region (top 8 rows?) Actually example input 12 rows, columns 11. Let's examine: rows 0-7 are A region? Row0-7 have A and R. Row8-11 have B region. Indeed rows 0-7 contain A and R. Rows 8-11 contain B and R. So border between A and B is horizontal line between row7 and row8. Red spirits (R) appear near border within each region. They need to move outward away from border to far edge of its own realm, keeping same column (lateral position) and shape (maybe 2x2 blocks). In example, there are two clusters of R in A region: a 2x2 block at rows2-3 columns2-3 (0-index). Another 2x2 block at rows5-6 columns5-6 (actually 3x3? Let's see: rows5-6 columns5-6 are R R, also row5-6 columns5-6? Input shows rows5: "A A A A A R R R A A A" that's three Rs at columns5,6,7? Wait count: columns 0-10. Row5: positions 0-4 A, 5 R,6 R,7 R,8 A,9 A,10 A. Row6 same. So a 2x3 block? Actually 2 rows x3 columns. In output, those Rs moved to leftmost side of A region? Output rows5-6 become "R R R A A A A A A A A". So the 2x3 block moved to columns0-2 (left edge). So they moved outward (away from border) which is upward? Wait border is between A and B at row7/8. So outward for A region is upward (towards top). So they should move up to top edge, preserving column positions? But they moved leftwards, not upward. Let's examine more: The 2x2 block at rows2-3 columns2-3 moved to rows2-3 columns0-1 (left edge). So they moved leftwards, not upward. So maybe border is vertical between A and B? But A region is left side? Let's re-evaluate orientation: In example, columns maybe split: left side A, right side B? Let's look at input rows: Row0: all A. Row8: all B. So horizontal split. So border is horizontal. Then "outward" from border for A region would be upward (north). But they moved leftwards (west). So maybe "lateral position" means keep row (vertical) same, move horizontally to edge. So they move away from border horizontally, i.e., across the border direction? Wait border is horizontal, so direction away from border is vertical. But they moved horizontally. So maybe border is vertical between A and B, but the grid shows A rows top, B rows bottom. Could be that azure region is left side (A) and blue region is right side (B) but they are stacked vertically in example due to shape? Let's examine B region rows: rows8-11 have B and R. In input, row9: "B B B R R B B B B B B". That's a 2x2 block at columns3-4 rows9-10? Actually row9 and row10 have R at columns3-4. In output, those Rs moved to right edge columns9-10 rows9-10. So they moved rightwards (east) to far edge of B region. So for B region, outward direction ... [10260 chars truncated]
"Two dance troupes rehearse on opposite halves of a mirrored studio. Red dancers in each troupe, following the choreographer's 'scatter!' command, chassé away from the center mirror toward the far wall of their own half."
120b: k=1
See: A studio split into two halves (azure and blue) by a center mirror, with red dancers in each half.
Do: Each dancer slides away from the mirror toward the far wall of their half, maintaining their lateral spacing and formation shape.
Grid: Studio unchanged. Half colors intact. Red dancers pressed against far walls.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12 rows? Actually given 12 rows of 11 columns? Let's count: first line "A A A A A A A A A A A" = 11 columns. 12 rows. Output also 12x11. Interpretation: azure (A) top half, blue (B) bottom half, mirror center? In input, there is a horizontal line separating azure and blue? In example, rows 1-8 are A region, rows 9-12 are B region. Mirror likely between row 8 and 9? Actually center mirror maybe between halves: azure top half rows 1-8, blue bottom half rows 9-12. Red dancers (R) appear in both halves. They slide away from mirror toward far wall of their half, maintaining lateral spacing and formation shape. So for each half, we take the pattern of R's and shift them towards the far edge (top edge for azure? Actually far wall of their half: For top half (azure), far wall is top edge (row 1). For bottom half (blue), far wall is bottom edge (row 12). They slide away from mirror (which is the boundary between halves). So they move vertically outward, preserving relative positions horizontally and shape. Thus we need to move the block of R's in each half to the far side. Let's test with example. Input top half rows 1-8 (A). R's present at rows 3-4 columns 3-4 (a 2x2 block). Also at rows 6-7 columns 6-8 (3x2 block). In output, those blocks moved upward to rows 3-4? Wait they already at rows 3-4 originally. In output they appear at rows 3-4 columns 1-2? Actually output rows 3-4: "R R A A A A A A A A A". So the 2x2 block moved leftwards? Not vertical. Hmm maybe mirror is vertical center line, not horizontal. Let's reconsider. Studio split into two halves (azure and blue) by a center mirror. Could be vertical mirror dividing left and right halves. Azure left, blue right? But colors: azure (A) and blue (B). In example, top rows are A, bottom rows B. That's horizontal split. Mirror could be horizontal line between them. But "center mirror" maybe vertical line? Let's examine transformation: In top half, R block originally at columns 3-4 rows 3-4. After transformation, they are at columns 1-2 rows 3-4 (shifted leftwards towards far wall of that half, which would be left edge). So far wall for azure half is left side (west). Mirror is vertical line separating azure (left) and blue (right). So azure half is left side columns? But in input, azure region is left side? Actually grid shows A across whole rows, not just left side. Wait the grid is 11 columns, all A in top rows. So azure region occupies whole width, not half. So maybe split is vertical: left half azure, right half blue. But the input shows top rows all A, bottom rows all B. So not. Maybe the "studio split into two halves (azure and blue) by a center mirror" means the mirror is horizontal dividing top azure and bottom blue. The far wall for azure half is top edge (north), for blue half is bottom edge (south). But the R blocks moved leftwards, not up/down. So maybe orientation is rotated: Mirror is vertical, azure left, blue right. In input, azure re ... [8898 chars truncated]
"Two tectonic plates of different rock — one azure sandstone, one blue basalt — meet at a divergent boundary. Red mineral deposits within each plate are carried by the spreading motion toward the plate's trailing edge, away from the rift."
120b: k=1
See: Two tectonic plates (azure and blue) meeting at a rift zone, with red mineral deposits embedded in each plate.
Do: Plate spreading carries each deposit away from the rift toward the far trailing edge of its own plate, preserving deposit shape and position along the rift axis.
Grid: Crust dimensions unchanged. Plate colors intact. Red deposits at trailing edges.
We need to infer rule. From description: two tectonic plates azure (A) and blue (B) meeting at a rift zone, with red deposits embedded in each plate. Plate spreading carries each deposit away from the rift toward the far trailing edge of its own plate, preserving deposit shape and position along the rift axis. So we have input grid with A region top? In example, input shows A rows at top (first 8 rows?) Actually example input: 12 rows, columns 11. Let's examine: rows 0-7 have A and some R. rows 8-11 have B and some R. So A plate is top, B plate bottom, meeting at a rift zone between them? The rift zone likely the boundary where A meets B. In input, there is a line of A rows then B rows. The boundary is between row 7 and 8? Let's see row 7: "A A A A A A A A A A A" (all A). Row 8: "B B B B B B B B B B B" (all B). So rift zone is that line? The red deposits are within each plate near the boundary? In input, there are R clusters near the boundary: For A plate, there are R at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (0-index). Also at rows 5-6 columns 5-7 (a 2x3 block). Those are near top plate but not at boundary. For B plate, there are R at rows 9-10 columns 3-4 (2x2 block) and at row 11 column 8 (single). Those are near bottom plate. Output: The R clusters have moved away from the rift towards trailing edge (farther from boundary). For A plate (top), trailing edge is top side (since plate spreading away from rift outward). So R clusters moved upward (north) preserving shape and column positions relative to rift axis? Let's see: original A R cluster at rows 2-3 cols2-3. In output, they appear at rows 2-3? Wait output rows 2-3 (0-index) show "R R A A ..." Actually output row2: "R R A A A A A A A A A". Row3 same. So they moved to columns 0-1? Wait original cluster at cols2-3 (0-index). Output cluster at cols0-1. That's shift left? Not upward. Let's map coordinates: Input grid columns 0-10. Original cluster at (row2, col2-3) and (row3, col2-3). Output cluster at (row2, col0-1) and (row3, col0-1). That's shift left by 2 columns. That's not vertical. Maybe rift zone is vertical boundary between A and B plates? Actually A region is left side? Let's examine columns: In input, first rows are all A across all columns, not left side. So not vertical. Maybe the rift zone is the central vertical line where plates meet? But A and B are separated horizontally? Not. Let's reconsider: The description: "Two tectonic plates (azure and blue) meeting at a rift zone". Could be that A and B are side by side horizontally, with a vertical rift line between them. In example, A rows are top, B rows bottom, so rift is horizontal line. So spreading carries deposits away from rift toward far trailing edge of its own plate. For top plate, trailing edge is top (north). So deposits should move upward (decrease row index). For bottom plate, trailing edge is bottom (south), so deposits move downward (increase row index). Let's test with example: For A plate, original cluster at rows2-3 (near top) m ... [9557 chars truncated]
"A baking sheet is divided into two zones of colored dough. Red berry clusters baked into each half slowly melt and slide toward the outer crust edges as the pan tilts away from the center seam."
120b: fail
See: Two adjacent dough regions (azure and blue) filling a rectangular pan, with red berry clusters embedded in each half.
Do: Each berry cluster slides from its position toward the outer crust edge of its own dough zone, away from the center seam, keeping its shape and row/column alignment.
Grid: Pan dimensions unchanged. Dough colors stay. Red clusters settle against the far crust edge, leaving clean dough behind.
We need to infer rule. From description: two adjacent dough regions (azure and blue) filling a rectangular pan, with red berry clusters embedded in each half. Each berry cluster slides from its position toward the outer crust edge of its own dough zone, away from the center seam, keeping its shape and row/column alignment. So we have two colored regions (A azure and B blue) adjacent horizontally? In example, input grid shows top part A region (rows 0-7) and bottom part B region (rows 8-11). Actually example input: first 8 rows are A, then rows 9-12 are B. So vertical adjacency: A region on top, B region below. Red clusters within each region. They slide outward away from the seam (the border between A and B). So for A region (top), they slide upward (toward top edge). For B region (bottom), they slide downward (toward bottom edge). They keep shape and row/column alignment: meaning each cluster moves as a block, preserving relative positions, moving until they hit edge of region (or grid). In output example, we see A region top: originally red 2x2 block at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (0-index). In output, that block moved to rows 2-3? Wait output shows rows 2-3 have R R at columns 0-1? Let's examine. Input example rows (0-index): 0: A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A R R A A A A A A A 3: A A R R A A A A A A A 4: A A A A A A A A A A A 5: A A A A A R R R A A A 6: A A A A A R R R A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A 8: B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B R R B B B B B B 10: B B B R R B B B B B B 11: B B B B B B B B R B B Output rows: 0: A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: R R A A A A A A A A A 3: R R A A A A A A A A A 4: A A A A A A A A A A A 5: R R R A A A A A A A A 6: R R R A A A A A A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A 8: B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B B B B B B B R R 10: B B B B B B B B B R R 11: B B B B B B B B B B R Let's see movement: For top A region, there are two clusters: a 2x2 at (2,2)-(3,3) and a 2x3? Actually rows5-6 columns5-7 (3x2?). Input cluster at rows5-6 columns5-7 (R R R). That's 2 rows x3 columns. In output, first cluster moved to leftmost columns? Wait output shows at rows2-3 columns0-1 are R R (2x2). So moved leftwards? But description says slide toward outer crust edge away from center seam. The seam between A and B is horizontal line between row7 and row8. So outer crust for top region is top edge (row0). So sliding upward, not left. But output shows moved leftwards, not upward. Let's examine coordinates: In input, cluster at rows2-3 columns2-3. If slide upward, would go to rows0-1 columns2-3. But output shows rows2-3 columns0-1. So maybe orientation is vertical seam? Actually maybe the two dough regions are left (azure) and right (blue) adjacent horizontally. In example, A region is left side? Let's check input: first 7 rows have A across all columns, then rows8-11 have B across all columns. That's vertical stacking, not side-by-side. So seam is horizontal. But output shows movement leftwards, which contradicts. ... [12106 chars truncated]
"Two choirs face away from each other on a split stage. Red soloists in each choir, feeling the tension of the divide, drift backward toward their own choir's exit wing — retreating from the rivalry at center stage."
120b: fail
See: A stage split into two colored sections (azure and blue) with red soloists positioned within each choir's section.
Do: Each red soloist glides straight back toward the far wing of their own section, away from the dividing line, maintaining their lateral position in the formation.
Grid: Stage layout unchanged. Choir backgrounds remain. Red soloists end up pressed against their section's far wall.
We need to infer rule. From description: stage split into two colored sections (azure and blue) with red soloists positioned within each choir's section. Each red soloist glides straight back toward the far wing of their own section, away from dividing line, maintaining lateral position. So we have two sections: top part azure (A) and bottom part blue (B) maybe? In example input, there are A rows at top, B rows at bottom. Red blocks within each region move downwards (for A region) or upwards? Let's examine example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 12 rows, 11 columns? Let's count: first line "A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 11 columns. 12 rows. The top region (A) rows 0-7? Actually rows 0-7 are A region, rows 8-11 are B region. In input, red squares appear within A region at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (0-index). Also at rows 5-6 columns 5-7 (a 2x3 block). In B region, reds at rows 9-10 columns 3-4 (2x2 block) and at row 11 column 8 (single). Output: reds have moved within each region towards far wall away from dividing line. Dividing line is between A and B region (horizontal line). So for A region (top), far wall is top edge? Wait "glides straight back toward the far wing of their own section, away from the dividing line". For top region, dividing line is bottom of A region (where B starts). So far wing is top edge. So reds should move upward (north) within A region, maintaining column positions, until they hit top edge or other reds? In output, the red block originally at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 moved to rows 0-1 columns 0-1? Let's see output rows 0-1: they are "A A A ..." not red. Actually output rows 2-3 have reds at columns 0-1? Let's examine output lines: Row0: A A A A A A A A A A A Row1: A A A A A A A A A A A Row2: R R A A A A A A A A A Row3: R R A A A A A A A A A Row4: A A A A A A A A A A A Row5: R R R A A A A A A A A Row6: R R R A A A A A A A A Row7: A A A A A A A A A A A Rows 8-11 B region. So original red block at rows2-3 cols2-3 moved to rows2-3 cols0-1? Actually output rows2-3 have reds at cols0-1 (two columns). So they shifted leftwards, not upwards. Wait maybe orientation is vertical split? Let's reconsider: Stage split into two colored sections (azure and blue) with red soloists positioned within each choir's section. Could be left-right split: azure left side, blue right side. In input, A region is left side? Let's examine columns: In input, first 5 rows are all A across all columns, then rows 8-11 are B across all columns. So not left-right. But maybe the split is vertical: left side azure (A) columns 0-? and right side blue (B) columns ? In example, top rows are A, bottom rows B, not left-right. But output shows reds moved leftwards within A region, and within B region they moved rightwards? Let's examine B region output: Input B region rows 8-11. Input reds: rows9-10 cols3-4 (2x2 block) and row11 col8. Output rows9-10 have reds at cols9-10? Actually output rows9: "B B B B B B B B B R R" (cols9-10). Row10 same. Row11: all B ( ... [12355 chars truncated]
"Two teams occupy opposite halves of a field. Red players on each side, sensing the halftime whistle, jog back to their own endzone — retreating from the midfield line to regroup at home base."
120b: k=1
See: A playing field divided into two colored halves (azure and blue) with red players scattered across each half.
Do: Each red player runs directly away from the midfield line toward their own endzone, sliding until they reach the far boundary of their half, keeping their lateral lane.
Grid: Field dimensions and half colors unchanged. Red players pressed against their respective endzone edges.
We need to infer rule. From description: field divided into two colored halves (azure and blue). In examples, top half is A (azure) rows, bottom half B (blue). Red players scattered across each half. Each red runs directly away from midfield line toward their own endzone, sliding until they reach far boundary of their half, keeping their lateral lane. Thus for each red cell, we move it vertically towards the edge of its half (top half moves up, bottom half moves down) until it hits the boundary (the outermost row of that half). Keep same column. Also they "pressed against their respective endzone edges" meaning after transformation, reds are at the far edge rows of each half. Check example 1: Input grid size? Let's count rows: 12 rows, columns 11? Actually first line: "A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 11 columns. So 12x11. Midfield line is between row 6 and 7? Since top half azure rows maybe first 6 rows (0-5) are A, bottom half rows 6-11 are B. Indeed rows 0-5 have A, rows 6-11 have B. In input, reds appear in both halves. Let's see top half reds: rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (0-index). They are a 2x2 block at rows 2-3, cols 2-3. According to rule, they should move up to topmost row of top half (row 0). In output, we see rows 2-3 become R R A ... Wait output shows rows 2 and 3 have R R at columns 0-1? Let's examine output lines: Output rows (0-index): 0: A A A A A A A A A A A 1: A A A A A A A A A A A 2: R R A A A A A A A A A 3: R R A A A A A A A A A 4: A A A A A A A A A A A 5: R R R A A A A A A A A 6: R R R A A A A A A A A 7: A A A A A A A A A A A 8: B B B B B B B B B B B 9: B B B B B B B B B R R 10: B B B B B B B B B R R 11: B B B B B B B B B B R Wait bottom half reds: Input bottom half rows 9-11? Let's list input bottom half rows (rows 6-11). Input rows 6-11: Row6 (index6): B B B B B B B B B B B (all B) Row7: B B B R R B B B B B B Row8: B B B R R B B B B B B Row9: B B B B B B B B R B B So reds at (7,3-4), (8,3-4), (9,8). According to rule, they should move down to bottommost row of bottom half (row 11). Keep column. So reds at columns 3,4 should go to row11 col3,4. In output, row11 has B ... B R at last column? Actually output row11: "B B B B B B B B B B B R". That's column 10 (0-index) red. That's the red from column 8 moved to column 10? Wait column shift? Let's map. In output rows 9 and 10 have reds at columns 9-10? Row9: "... B B B B B B B B B R R". That's columns 9 and 10 (0-index). Row10 same. Row11 has red at column 10 only. So something else: maybe reds slide horizontally towards edge? Let's re-evaluate. Maybe "midfield line" is vertical dividing line between halves (left/right). But description says two colored halves azure and blue, likely left half azure, right half blue. In example, top half azure? Actually colors: A azure top half, B blue bottom half. So halves are horizontal (top/bottom). So "midfield line" is horizontal line separating halves. Red runs away from midfield line toward own endzone (i.e., top half reds move up, bott ... [9836 chars truncated]
"A weather front divides the sky into two pressure zones. Red storm cells in each zone are swept by diverging winds — pushed outward from the front line toward the far edges of their own air mass."
120b: fail
See: Two atmospheric zones (azure and blue) meeting at a front, with red storm cells embedded in each zone.
Do: Diverging winds carry each storm cell away from the front, sliding it to the outermost boundary of its zone while preserving its shape and cross-wind position.
Grid: Sky dimensions unchanged. Zone colors intact. Red cells accumulate at the far boundary of each zone.
We need to infer rule. From description: two zones azure (A) and blue (B) meeting at a front. Red cells embedded in each zone. Diverging winds carry each storm cell away from the front, sliding it to outermost boundary of its zone while preserving shape and cross-wind position. Interpretation: Input grid has top region A (azure) and bottom region B (blue) separated by a horizontal line? In example, A rows at top (first 8 rows?) Actually example input: 12 rows, columns 11. Let's examine: rows 0-7 are A region? Row0-1 all A. Row2-3 have R block at columns 2-3 within A region. Row4 all A. Row5-6 have R block at columns5-7 within A region? Wait row5: "A A A A A R R R A A A" that's columns5-7 (0-index). Row7 all A. Then rows8-11 are B region: rows8-9 all B. Row10-11 have R block at columns3-4? Actually row10: "B B B R R B B B B B B". Row11: "B B B B B B B B R B B". So B region includes some R cells. Output: In A region, the R blocks have moved leftwards to column0? Let's see output rows2-3: "R R A A A A A A A A A". So the 2x2 block moved to leftmost columns (0-1). Row5-6: "R R R A A A A A A A A". The 3x2 block moved to leftmost columns (0-2). So they slid horizontally towards left edge of A region (which is the outer boundary away from front). The front is the boundary between A and B zones (horizontal line). Diverging winds carry each storm cell away from the front: For A zone (above front), away from front is upward? Actually front is between zones; for A zone (top), away from front would be upward (north). But they moved leftwards, not up. Wait maybe orientation: front is vertical line where zones meet? In example, A region is left side? Let's examine columns: In input, A region occupies left side? Actually columns 0-? The grid has both A and B columns? Input rows have A and B intermix? Let's view columns: Row0: all A. Row8: all B. So zones are horizontal: top rows A, bottom rows B. So front is horizontal line between them. Diverging winds would push red cells away from front: For A zone (above front), away is upward (north). For B zone (below front), away is downward (south). But in output, red cells moved leftwards, not up/down. So maybe orientation is vertical: front is vertical line where zones meet left-right. Let's examine example: In input, there are A rows at top and also A columns? Actually row0-7 are A region, but also there are B rows at bottom. So front is horizontal. Yet red cells moved leftwards within each zone, which is perpendicular to front. The description says "preserving its shape and cross-wind position". Cross-wind position maybe column position relative to front? If wind diverges away from front, they slide outward along the direction perpendicular to front? Wait cross-wind could be along the front (horizontal) while wind direction is away (vertical). But they moved horizontally, which is along front, not away. Maybe we misinterpret zones: Azure (A) and blue (B) meeting at a front could be vertical front: left side azure, ... [12104 chars truncated]
"Two adjoining buildings share a party wall. Red furniture in each building is being evacuated — movers slide each piece away from the shared wall toward the building's exterior facade, flush against the outside."
120b: k=1
See: Two buildings (azure and blue) sharing a wall, with red furniture pieces placed in various rooms of each building.
Do: Each piece of furniture is pushed directly away from the party wall until it rests against the far exterior wall of its own building, staying in its corridor.
Grid: Building footprints unchanged. Wall colors remain. Red furniture ends up against each building's far exterior wall.
We need to infer rule. From description: two buildings azure (A) and blue (B) sharing a wall (party wall). Red furniture pieces (R) placed in various rooms of each building. Each piece is pushed directly away from the party wall until it rests against the far exterior wall of its own building, staying in its corridor. Interpretation: Input grid has two regions: top part maybe azure building (A) and bottom part blue building (B) sharing a wall? In example, we have A region at top rows, B region at bottom rows. The party wall is the boundary between them (horizontal line). Red pieces within each region are moved outward away from that boundary, i.e., for A region (top), move up towards top edge; for B region (bottom), move down towards bottom edge. They move in same column, staying in same column (corridor). They shift until they hit the far exterior wall (grid edge) or maybe until they encounter other red pieces? In example, let's examine. Example input grid size: 12 rows, 11 columns? Actually lines show 11 columns. Let's index rows 0-11. Rows 0-3 are A region (azure). Row 4 is A row all A. Row5-7 have A region with R blocks. Row8-11 are B region. Let's map coordinates of R in A region: In rows2-3 columns2-3 (0-index). That's a 2x2 block. In rows5-6 columns5-6 (0-index) also 2x2 block. In output, those R blocks have moved upward to top edge? Let's see output rows: Rows0-1 all A. Row2: "R R A ..." So the 2x2 block moved to rows2-3? Wait originally at rows2-3 columns2-3. In output rows2-3 columns0-1? Actually output row2: "R R A A A A A A A A A". So R at columns0-1. Row3 same. So block moved left? Not up. Hmm. Maybe orientation: The party wall is vertical shared wall between two buildings side by side (left-right). Let's examine: In input, A region on left side columns0-? B region on right side columns? Actually input rows show A rows first then B rows later, not side by side. So maybe building footprints unchanged but colors remain. The party wall is vertical line where A and B meet? In input, there is a region of A rows at top, B rows at bottom, not side by side. So party wall is horizontal line between them. Then moving away from party wall means A region pieces move up (north), B region pieces move down (south). In output, the A region R blocks moved up to top edge? Let's see: original A block at rows2-3 columns2-3. After moving up, they should be at rows0-1 same columns2-3. But output shows them at columns0-1 rows2-3. So not matching. Maybe the corridor is vertical (columns) and they move horizontally away from party wall (which is vertical). Let's consider that A region is left side, B region right side. In input, first rows are A rows, later rows B rows, but maybe columns also have A and B interleaved? Let's examine input rows: Row0: "A A A A A A A A A A A" all A. Row8: "B B B B B B B B B B B". So indeed A region occupies top rows, B bottom rows. So party wall is horizontal line between row7 and row8? Actually row7 is A row all A. Row ... [7534 chars truncated]
"Two kingdoms share a contested border. Red garrisons in each kingdom receive orders to fall back — retreating from the border to fortify the homeland's far frontier, leaving scorched earth behind."
120b: k=1
See: Two kingdoms (azure and blue) sharing a border, with red garrisons stationed within each territory.
Do: Each garrison withdraws from the shared border, marching to the far frontier of its own kingdom, maintaining its file position. Vacated ground returns to the kingdom's color.
Grid: Map unchanged. Territory colors intact. Red garrisons repositioned at each kingdom's far edge.
We need to infer rule. From description: Two kingdoms (azure and blue) sharing a border, with red garrisons within each territory. Each garrison withdraws from the shared border, marching to the far frontier of its own kingdom, maintaining its file position. Vacated ground returns to the kingdom's color. Interpretation: Input grid has two colored regions: azure (A) and blue (B). They share a border (adjacent rows maybe). Red (R) cells are inside each region, possibly near the border. The rule: For each column (file), the red cells move to the far edge of their region (i.e., to the side opposite the border) while staying in same column. The cells they vacate become the region's color (A or B). So essentially shift red cells within each region towards the outer side. Let's examine example 1 to confirm. Input grid dimensions: 12 rows? Let's list rows with indices. Row0: A A A A A A A A A A A Row1: A A A A A A A A A A A Row2: A A R R A A A A A A A Row3: A A R R A A A A A A A Row4: A A A A A A A A A A A Row5: A A A A A R R R A A A Row6: A A A A A R R R A A A Row7: A A A A A A A A A A A Row8: B B B B B B B B B B B Row9: B B B R R B B B B B B Row10: B B B R R B B B B B B Row11: B B B B B B B B R B B We need to see border between A and B: rows 0-7 are A region, rows 8-11 are B region. The border is between row7 and row8 (adjacent rows). Red garrisons within each region: In A region, there are two clusters: at rows2-3 columns2-3 (0-index) and rows5-6 columns5-7 (three columns). In B region, there are red at rows9-10 columns3-4 (two columns) and row11 column8 (single). According to rule, each red should move to far frontier of its own kingdom, maintaining column. For A region, far frontier is top side (row0) because border is bottom side? Actually A region is above border, so far edge is top (row0). So red should move upward within same column until hitting topmost row (row0) or until region boundary? In output, let's see. Output rows: Row0: A A A A A A A A A A A (unchanged) Row1: A A A A A A A A A A A (unchanged) Row2: R R A A A A A A A A A Row3: R R A A A A A A A A A Row4: A A A A A A A A A A A Row5: R R R A A A A A A A A Row6: R R R A A A A A A A A Row7: A A A A A A A A A A A Row8: B B B B B B B B B B B Row9: B B B B B B B B B R R Row10: B B B B B B B B B R R Row11: B B B B B B B B B B R Now compare: For first A cluster originally at rows2-3 cols2-3 (0-index). In output they are at rows2-3 cols0-1? Wait output rows2-3 have R R at columns0-1, not columns2-3. That's shift leftwards, not upward. Hmm maybe orientation different: "file position" maybe means column (file) stays same, but row changes. However output shows column changed. Let's map coordinates. Original cluster: rows2-3, cols2-3 (if zero-index). Output cluster: rows2-3, cols0-1. That's shift left by 2 columns. That's not same column. Maybe we misinterpret orientation: "file position" could refer to column index within region's width? Actually "file" could be column (like in chess). S ... [8627 chars truncated]
"The stage is split by a curtain into two colored wings. Red props in each wing are pulled offstage by stagehands — dragged away from the curtain toward the far exit of their respective wing."
120b: k=1
See: A stage divided by a curtain into two wings (azure and blue), with red props placed in each wing.
Do: Stagehands drag each prop directly away from the curtain until it sits against the far wall of its wing, preserving the prop's shape and its position along the curtain.
Grid: Stage dimensions unchanged. Wing colors remain. Red props rest against the far walls.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 12x11? Actually given rows: first line has 11 entries. Let's count: "A A A A A A A A A A A" = 11 columns, 12 rows. Output same dimensions. Interpretation: Stage divided by curtain into two wings (azure and blue). Azure = A, blue = B. Curtain likely the line separating them? In input, top rows are A, bottom rows B. So curtain is horizontal line separating azure (top) and blue (bottom). Red props (R) placed in each wing. Need to drag each prop directly away from the curtain until it sits against far wall of its wing, preserving shape and its position along the curtain. Thus for each contiguous red shape (maybe rectangle) in each wing, we shift it away from the dividing line (the curtain) towards the far edge (top for azure wing? Actually curtain divides stage into two wings: azure (top) and blue (bottom). The curtain is between them. So for azure wing (top), far wall is top edge. For blue wing (bottom), far wall is bottom edge. So we move red shapes vertically away from the curtain: upward for top wing, downward for bottom wing. Preserve shape and its horizontal position (i.e., column alignment). So we shift each red shape as far as possible until it hits border. Check example: Input top part (rows 0-7) are A region. Red shapes there: at rows 2-3 columns 2-3 (0-index?). Actually row indices: row0 A..., row1 A..., row2 has "A A R R A A A A A A A". So a 2x2 block at columns 2-3 rows2-3. In output, that block moved to rows0-1 columns0-1? Wait output rows 0-1 are unchanged A. Row2 output: "R R A A A A A A A A A". So the red block moved to rows2? Let's examine: Output row2 (index2) has R R at columns0-1. That's shifted left and up? Not just up. Let's map. Input top wing: rows0-7 (since later rows 8-11 are B). The curtain line maybe between row7 and row8? Actually row8 is B row. So curtain is between row7 and row8. So top wing rows0-7. Red shapes in top wing: there is a 2x2 block at rows2-3 columns2-3. Also another shape at rows5-6 columns5-6 (a 2x2 block). In output, we see first shape moved to rows2-3 columns0-1? Wait output rows2-3 have "R R A A ..." So rows2-3 columns0-1 are R. That's shifted leftwards to column0-1, not up. But rule says preserve position along curtain (i.e., horizontal alignment). So maybe "position along the curtain" means relative to the dividing line horizontally? Actually curtain is vertical? Let's reconsider. Maybe curtain is vertical line dividing left (azure) and right (blue). In example, top rows are A, bottom rows B, but also left side maybe azure? Wait colors: azure = A, blue = B. In input, top rows are A, bottom rows B. So curtain is horizontal line. "Preserving the prop's shape and its position along the curtain" meaning its horizontal offset relative to curtain (i.e., column position) stays same. So moving vertically only, not horizontally. But in output, the red block moved leftwards, which contradicts. Let's examine more carefully: Input row2: columns: 0 A,1 A,2 R, ... [10098 chars truncated]
"Two garden beds share a stone border. Red flowers in each bed are transplanted by a gardener who always moves them to the far fence — as far from the shared border as possible, keeping each bloom in its row."
120b: k=3
See: Two garden beds (azure and blue) separated by a border, with red flowers planted in various spots within each bed.
Do: Each red flower is transplanted away from the shared border to the far fence of its own bed, sliding along its row or column, preserving shape.
Grid: Garden layout unchanged. Bed colors remain. Red flowers pressed against the far fence of each bed.
We need to infer rule. From description: Two garden beds (azure and blue) separated by a border, with red flowers planted in various spots within each bed. Each red flower is transplanted away from the shared border to the far fence of its own bed, sliding along its row or column, preserving shape. Interpretation: Input grid has two regions: azure (A) and blue (B) separated by a border? In examples, there is a horizontal border? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? 12 rows x 11 columns? Actually given lines: first row: A A A A A A A A A A A (11). So 12 rows, 11 columns. Rows 0-7 are A region? Actually first 8 rows are A region (azure). Then rows 8-11 are B region (blue). So horizontal division: top part azure, bottom part blue. The border is maybe a row of something? In example, there is no explicit border row; just the change from A to B at row 8. So the "shared border" is the interface between the two colors (A and B). Red cells are within each region but may be adjacent to border. The rule: each red shape moves away from border to far edge of its region, sliding along row or column, preserving shape orientation. Specifically, for each contiguous red shape (connected orthogonally?) we slide it in direction away from border (i.e., for top region, move up; for bottom region, move down) until it hits the far edge of that region (i.e., topmost row for azure region, bottommost row for blue region). The shape may be rectangular block. Check Example1: In azure region (top), there are two red blocks: a 2x2 block at rows 2-3, cols 2-3 (0-index). Another 2x3 block at rows 5-6, cols 5-6-7? Actually rows 5-6 have R R R at cols 5-7. In output, these blocks moved up to top rows? Let's see output: rows 2-3 now have R R at cols 0-1 (moved left? Wait). Output rows 2-3: "R R A A A A A A A A A". So the 2x2 block moved to columns 0-1, rows 2-3 unchanged row positions? Actually original block at rows2-3, cols2-3. Output block at rows2-3, cols0-1. That's moving left, not up. Hmm maybe border is vertical? Let's examine region division: maybe azure region is left side, blue region right side? But in example, azure region is left side? Let's view grid: first 8 rows are A, last 4 rows are B. So horizontal division. The red block moved leftwards, which is away from border? The border between azure and blue is horizontal line, not vertical. So moving left doesn't make sense. Maybe the border is vertical: The azure region is left side columns? Let's examine columns: In example1, first 5 columns maybe A? Actually rows 0-7 have A across all columns. So azure region is whole top area. So border is between top and bottom. So moving away from border would be up for top region, down for bottom region. But the block moved left, not up. So maybe shape slides along row or column whichever direction leads away from border, but also preserving shape orientation relative to border? Wait maybe the shape slides along the axis perpendicular to border? For horizontal border, mov ... [12912 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains one or two L-shaped structures made of grey (X) cells against a black (.) background. Each L-shape consists of two perpendicular arms meeting at a corner. One arm is a straight line of grey cells (the 'length arm'). The other arm (the 'pattern arm') sits at the end of the length arm and contains either: (a) a single column or row of colored cells adjacent to the grey arm, where each cell is a different color — this is a 1D color sequence; or (b) a small rectangular block of colored cells (2 or more rows/columns) forming a 2D tile pattern. The L-shape defines a rectangular fill region: the area swept out by extending the pattern arm along the full length of the length arm.
Do: For each L-shaped grey structure in the grid: 1. Identify the two arms of the L. One arm is a straight bar of grey cells. The other arm meets it at a corner. 2. Determine which arm carries the pattern. The pattern arm has colored (non-black, non-grey) cells adjacent to it, either as a 1D sequence along the arm or as a 2D block at the end of the arm. The other arm (the length arm) defines how far the pattern should be replicated. 3. Count the number of cells along the length arm — this is how many times (or how far) the pattern must be extended. 4. If the pattern is 1D (one colored cell per row or column along the pattern arm): extend each color across the full span defined by the length arm. Each colored cell becomes a full row or column of that color, matching the length of the length arm. 5. If the pattern is 2D (a small rectangular tile of colored cells): tile that pattern repeatedly along the direction of the length arm to fill the rectangular region. The tile repeats cyclically until the full length is covered. 6. The grey cells and all other cells outside the fill region remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid is 10x10 with a black (.) background. Grey (X) cells form L-shaped borders that remain in place in the output. The fill regions are rectangular areas bounded by the L-shapes. Cells outside the L-shapes and their fill regions stay black. Multiple independent L-shapes may exist in the same grid, each processed separately.
"A paint roller loaded with a pattern stamps its design across a wall measured by its guide rail."
120b: k=1
See: On a dark canvas, grey steel scaffolding forms right-angled brackets — like an architect's L-square laid down. One arm of each bracket is a measuring rail, counting off how far the work must go. Where the other arm meets it, a painter has loaded a swatch — sometimes a single stripe of colors stacked like paint samples on a card, sometimes a small patchwork tile like a fabric sample. The swatch waits at the corner, ready to be rolled out across the empty wall the bracket frames.
Do: The painter picks up the swatch from the corner of the bracket and loads it onto a roller. Then, guided by the measuring rail, the roller presses the swatch across the blank wall — one stamp for every rung on the rail. If the swatch is a single column of colors, each color bleeds sideways into a full band stretching the length of the rail. If the swatch is a patchwork tile, it prints and reprints in a wallpaper pattern, tiling end to end until the rail runs out. The scaffolding itself is structural — it never takes paint, never moves. It just frames the workspace and dictates the reach of the roller.
Grid: The dark canvas is 10×10. Grey scaffolding brackets stand rigid, forming the borders of rectangular workspaces. The painter only fills inside the workspace each bracket defines — everything beyond the scaffolding stays bare. If two brackets appear on the same canvas, each painter works independently within their own frame.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: grey scaffolding brackets form right-angled brackets (L shape). One arm is a measuring rail (counting off how far the work must go). The other arm meets it at corner where a swatch (single column of colors stacked, or a patchwork tile) is placed. Then the painter picks up the swatch and rolls it across the empty wall inside the bracket, one stamp per rung on the rail. If swatch is a single column of colors, each color bleeds sideways into a full band stretching the length of the rail. If swatch is a patchwork tile, it prints and reprints in a wallpaper pattern, tiling end to end until the rail runs out. So we need to detect brackets formed by X (grey). The bracket is an L shape: vertical arm and horizontal arm meeting at a corner. The vertical arm is the measuring rail? Or the horizontal? The description: "One arm of each bracket is a measuring rail, counting off how far the work must go. Where the other arm meets it, a painter has loaded a swatch". So the other arm (the one not the rail) holds the swatch at the corner. The rail determines length of fill. In example 1: Input grid shows X's forming a horizontal line from (1,1?) Let's index rows 0-9, columns 0-9. Example 1 Input: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . X X X X X X . . . Row2: . R . . . . . . . . Row3: . B . . . . . . . . Row4: . R . . . . . . . . Row5: . M . . . . . . . . Row6: . B . . . . . . . . Row7: . B . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . So X's are at row1 columns1-6 (six X's). That's a horizontal line. No vertical line? Actually there is no vertical X's. So bracket? Maybe the vertical arm is the column of X's? But we only have horizontal. Wait maybe the bracket is formed by X's that are contiguous forming a right angle: a horizontal line and a vertical line meeting at a corner. In example 1, we have only horizontal line. But maybe the vertical arm is implied by the column of X's at column1? Let's check column1 rows1-? Row1 col1 is X, row2 col1 is R (not X). So no vertical X. Thus maybe the bracket is just a line of X's that serves as rail, and the swatch is at one end (the leftmost X?) Actually the swatch appears as colored cells adjacent to the X line? In example, we have colored cells (R,B,R,M,B,B) placed in column2? Let's see coordinates: Row2 col1 is R? Actually row2 col1 is R (since row2: . R . . . . . . . .). That's column1 (0-index). Row3 col1 B, row4 col1 R, row5 col1 M, row6 col1 B, row7 col1 B. So there is a vertical column of colors directly below the X line? The X line is at row1 columns1-6. The colored column is at column1 rows2-7. So the corner is at (row1,col1) where X meets the column of colors? The swatch is a vertical column of colors (R,B,R,M,B,B). That's a single column swatch. The rail is the horizontal line of X's extending to the right from the corner. So the rule: replicate the column of colors horizontally across the length of the rail (excluding the corner X maybe). Ou ... [12330 chars truncated]
"A strand of DNA unzips along its backbone, and the exposed nucleotide sequence is transcribed repeatedly by ribosomes traveling the length of the messenger RNA scaffold."
120b: k=2
See: Grey bones form right-angled scaffolds. At the joint of each scaffold, a sequence of colored nucleotides clings to one limb. The other limb stretches out bare, awaiting replication.
Do: Each nucleotide sequence copies itself outward along the bare bone, filling the rectangular tissue defined by the scaffold. A single-strand sequence extends each color into a full band; a multi-strand codon block tiles cyclically until the bone runs out.
Grid: 10x10 black membrane. Grey bones persist. Colored tissue fills the rectangular region bounded by the scaffold arms. Everything outside remains black.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: Grey bones form right-angled scaffolds. At the joint of each scaffold, a sequence of colored nucleotides clings to one limb. The other limb stretches out bare, awaiting replication. Each nucleotide sequence copies itself outward along the bare bone, filling the rectangular tissue defined by the scaffold. A single-strand sequence extends each color into a full band; a multi-strand codon block tiles cyclically until the bone runs out. Grid details: 10x10 black membrane. Grey bones persist. Colored tissue fills the rectangular region bounded by the scaffold arms. Everything outside remains black. Interpretation: The grey X cells form right-angle shapes (like an L shape). At the joint (the corner) there is a colored cell adjacent to one arm (the "clinging" side). The other arm is empty (black). The rule: replicate the colored pattern along the empty arm, filling the rectangle defined by the two arms (i.e., the area of the rectangle with corner at the joint, extending along both arms). In examples, we see. Example1 Input: Grey X row at row1 (index 1) columns 1-5? Actually grid 10x10. Input shows row1 (0-index?) Let's map coordinates. Row0 all .; Row1: . X X X X X X . . . (so X from col1 to col6). Then column? Also there are colored cells at rows2-7 column1? Let's see: Row2: . R . . . . . . . . (R at col1). Row3: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col1). Row4: . R . . . . . . . . (R at col1). Row5: . M . . . . . . . . (M at col1). Row6: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col1). Row7: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col1). So we have a vertical line of X from row1 col1-col6? Actually X row is horizontal line at row1 columns1-6. The colored cells are in column1 rows2-7. So the scaffold is an L shape: the corner at (row1,col1) where X meets? Actually the X line is horizontal, and there is also a vertical line of X? No, there is only horizontal X line. But the description says right-angled scaffold: maybe the X line is the "bone" that extends both right and down? Wait there is also X cells in column? In example1, there is no vertical X line, only horizontal. But the colored cells are attached to the vertical arm (col1) which is not X but black? Actually the vertical arm is black except colored cells at some rows. The rule: replicate colored cells horizontally across the rectangle defined by the horizontal X line (length 6) and vertical extent of colored cells (rows2-7). Output shows that each row with a colored cell now has that color repeated across columns1-6 (the X line region). Indeed output row2: . R R R R R R . . . (R repeated across columns1-6). Row3: . B B B B B B . . . etc. So the rectangle is rows2-7, columns1-6 (the region bounded by the horizontal X line (top) and the vertical line of colored cells (left side). The X line remains unchanged (still X). The colored cells fill the rectangle. Thus rule: Find a horizontal line of X (grey) that forms top edge of rectangle, and a vertical line of colored cells attached at ... [10971 chars truncated]
"A prism at the corner of a telescope splits starlight into spectral lines, and the telescope's focal length determines how far each spectral band is drawn across the detector array."
120b: k=3
See: Grey telescope tubes form L-shaped optical paths. Spectral colors emerge at the prism junction. One tube sets the focal length; the other carries the spectral signature.
Do: Draw each spectral line across the detector for the full focal length. A single spectrum stretches each wavelength into a complete band; a compound spectral pattern tiles cyclically across the array.
Grid: 10x10 dark sky. Grey optical elements persist. Spectral bands fill the rectangular detector region. Dark sky remains outside.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey telescope tubes form L-shaped optical paths. Spectral colors emerge at the prism junction. One tube sets focal length; other carries spectral signature. Draw each spectral line across detector for full focal length. A single spectrum stretches each wavelength into a complete band; a compound spectral pattern tiles cyclically across array. Grid details: 10x10 dark sky. Grey optical elements persist. Spectral bands fill rectangular detector region. Dark sky remains outside. Interpretation: Input has grey X forming L shape (like two perpendicular lines). At the corner (junction) there are colored cells (R,B,M etc) placed adjacent? In examples, the X's form a vertical line and a horizontal line meeting at a corner (like an L). The colored cells are placed at positions adjacent to the corner along one of the arms? Let's examine Example1. Input1: grid 10x10. Row1 all . Row2: . X X X X X X . . . (so horizontal line from col2 to col8). Row3: . R . . . . . . . . (R at col2). Row4: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col2). Row5: . R . . . . . . . . (R at col2). Row6: . M . . . . . . . . (M at col2). Row7: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col2). Row8: . B . . . . . . . . (B at col2). So X's form a horizontal line at row2 columns2-8. Also there is a vertical line? Actually there is no vertical X's in input. Wait there is only that horizontal line. But description says L-shaped optical paths. Maybe the vertical line is implied by the column of colored cells? In output, the colored cells are extended horizontally across the same rows as the horizontal X line? Let's see output1: Row2 unchanged X line. Row3: . R R R R R R . . . (R extended across columns2-7). Row4: . B B B B B B . . . (B extended). Row5: . R R R R R R . . . Row6: . M M M M M M . . . Row7: . B B B B B B . . . Row8: . B B B B B B . . . So the colored cells have been "stretched" horizontally across the length of the X line (from column2 to column8). So the X line defines the focal length (the length across which to repeat). The colored cells are at the start of the line (col2) and they get repeated across the line. Thus rule: For each row that contains a colored cell (non-grey) at the column where the X line starts (or maybe any column), we fill the same color across the contiguous X segment in that row (or maybe across the whole rectangle defined by X's). In example1, the X line is horizontal only, not vertical. So we just fill horizontally. Example2: Input2: Let's map. Row1 all . Row2: X . . . . . . . . . (X at col1). Row3: X . . . . . . . . . Row4: X . . . . . . . . . Row5: X . . . . . . . . . Row6: X . . . . . . . . . Row7: X . . . . . . . . . Row8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . Row9: X O G O O G G . . . Row10 all . So X's form a vertical line at column1 rows2-9 (8 cells). At rows8 and 9 there are colored cells adjacent to X line: row8 col2 Y, col3 G, col4 G, col5 Y, col6 Y, col7 Y. Row9 col2 O, col3 G, col4 O, col5 O, col6 G, col7 G. So the colored pattern is a 2-row bl ... [11021 chars truncated]
"A tide pushes a band of colored coral along a sea wall's corner, depositing the same striped pattern in every cove along the breakwater's reach."
120b: k=2
See: Grey breakwaters form L-shaped harbor walls. Colored coral bands cluster at the elbow. One arm of the wall measures the coastline; the other holds the coral pattern.
Do: The tide deposits the coral pattern into every cove along the breakwater. A single band of coral stretches each color into a full reef stripe; a mosaic tile of coral repeats cyclically along the wall's length.
Grid: 10x10 deep ocean. Grey breakwaters persist. Coral fills the rectangular harbor shallows. Open water remains dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey breakwaters (X) form L-shaped harbor walls. Colored coral bands cluster at the elbow. One arm of the wall measures the coastline; the other holds the coral pattern. The tide deposits the coral pattern into every cove along the breakwater. A single band of coral stretches each color into a full reef stripe; a mosaic tile of coral repeats cyclically along the wall's length. Interpretation: Input has grey X forming an L shape (vertical and horizontal). At the elbow (corner) there is a cluster of colored cells (non-X) forming a rectangular block? In examples, the colored pattern appears at the interior of the L? Let's examine Example1. Input1 grid 10x10. Row indices 0-9. Rows: 0: all . 1: . X X X X X X . . . 2: . R . . . . . . . . 3: . B . . . . . . . . 4: . R . . . . . . . . 5: . M . . . . . . . . 6: . B . . . . . . . . 7: . B . . . . . . . . 8: all . 9: all . So X's form a horizontal line at row1 columns1-6 (0-index?). Actually row1 col1-col6 are X. That's a horizontal line. No vertical line? Wait there is no vertical X column? So L shape maybe vertical line missing? Actually maybe the L shape is the X's forming a line, and the elbow is at (row1,col1?) Not sure. Output1: same X line unchanged. The colored cells (R,B,M) have been expanded horizontally across the same columns as X line? Let's see output rows 2-7: they have colors repeated across columns1-6 (same as X line). For each row, the original color at column1 (R,B,R,M,B,B) is repeated across columns1-6. So rule: For each row that contains a colored cell in column left of X line? Actually the X line is at row1, columns1-6. The colored cells are below that line, in column1 only. The output replicates that color across the X line's columns (i.e., horizontally) for each row where there is a colored cell. Thus the "tide" deposits the coral pattern into every cove along the breakwater: The breakwater is the X line (horizontal). The "cove" maybe each row below the line? The coral pattern (colored band) is a vertical column of colors at the elbow (the leftmost column). Then the pattern is repeated horizontally across the breakwater length. Now Example2. Input2: X's form a vertical line at column0 rows1-8 (since first column X). Also there is a horizontal line? Actually row7 has X at col0 then Y G G Y Y Y . . . So the elbow is at (row7,col0) where there is X and also colored pattern to the right? Let's view. Rows: 0: all . 1: X . . . . . . . . . 2: X . . . . . . . . . 3: X . . . . . . . . . 4: X . . . . . . . . . 5: X . . . . . . . . . 6: X . . . . . . . . . 7: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . 8: X O G O O G G . . . 9: all . So X vertical line column0 rows1-8. At rows7 and 8, there are colored patterns to the right of X (starting at column1). That's the "coral band cluster at elbow". The elbow is at row7 col0? Actually the elbow is where the vertical and horizontal meet? The horizontal part maybe rows7-8? The pattern forms a 2x? rectangle of colors (rows7-8, ... [11281 chars truncated]
"A bus line meets a data register at a junction; the register's bit pattern is clocked out onto every address line for as many cycles as the bus is wide."
120b: k=3
See: Grey bus traces form L-shaped circuit paths. Colored data bits sit in the register at the junction. One trace counts clock cycles; the other holds the bit pattern.
Do: Clock the register's pattern out along the bus. A single-bit-wide register drives each value across the full bus width; a multi-bit register tiles its pattern cyclically for every clock cycle.
Grid: 10x10 dark PCB. Grey traces remain. Data bits fill the rectangular address space. Unpowered board stays dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey bus traces form L-shaped circuit paths. Colored data bits sit in the register at the junction. One trace counts clock cycles; the other holds the bit pattern. Clock the register's pattern out along the bus. A single-bit-wide register drives each value across the full bus width; a multi-bit register tiles its pattern cyclically for every clock cycle. Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming L-shaped path (like a bus). At the junction (corner) there are colored cells (data bits) forming a rectangular region (register). The output replicates those colored bits along the bus lines: horizontally and vertically? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input: Grey X line row 1 (index 1) columns 1-5? Actually grid 10x10. Row1 (0-index?) Let's map. Input rows: Row0: all . Row1: . X X X X X X . . . Row2: . R . . . . . . . . Row3: . B . . . . . . . . Row4: . R . . . . . . . . Row5: . M . . . . . . . . Row6: . B . . . . . . . . Row7: . B . . . . . . . . Rows8-9 all . So grey X forms a horizontal line at row1 columns1-6 (0-index?). Actually column1 to column6 inclusive (6 cells). That's the bus. The register is a vertical column of colored cells at column2? Wait colored cells are at column1? Let's index columns: col0 '.'; col1 X; col2 X; col3 X; col4 X; col5 X; col6 X; col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'. The colored bits are at column1? Actually row2 col1 is R? Row2: ". R . . . . . . . ." So column1 is R. Row3 column1 B, row4 column1 R, row5 column1 M, row6 column1 B, row7 column1 B. So they are directly under the X line, same column as first X? The X line includes column1 as first X. So the register is a vertical column of colored cells directly under the bus line, starting at row2 to row7 (6 rows). So the register width is 1 (single-bit register). Output: The colored pattern is replicated horizontally across the bus width (the X line) for each row where register exists. Indeed output rows 2-7 have the colored cells extended across columns1-6 (the bus). For each row, the color repeats across the bus width (same as original color). So rule: For each row where there is a colored cell under the bus (i.e., at the column where bus starts), fill the entire bus line (the contiguous X cells) with that color. Now Example2: Input: Grey X forms vertical line? Let's see. Input rows: Row0: all . Row1: X . . . . . . . . . Row2: X . . . . . . . . . Row3: X . . . . . . . . . Row4: X . . . . . . . . . Row5: X . . . . . . . . . Row6: X . . . . . . . . . Row7: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . Row8: X O G O O G G . . . Row9: all . So X column at col0 rows1-8 (vertical line). At rows7 and 8 there are colored cells to the right of X (starting at col1?). Row7: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . So after X, there is a pattern of colors across columns1-6 (maybe register). Row8: X O G O O G G . . . So register is a 2-row tall rectangle (rows7-8) columns1-6 (width 6). The bus is vertical line at column0 rows1-8. Output: The colored pattern is replicated vertically al ... [11810 chars truncated]
"A runic inscription at the corner of a sacred threshold is chanted once for every stone in the temple wall, and each chant etches the rune pattern deeper across the chamber floor."
120b: fail
See: Grey temple walls form L-shaped thresholds. Colored runes are inscribed at the corner. One wall counts the chanting stones; the other bears the runic inscription.
Do: Chant the runes along the wall, etching the pattern across the floor for every stone. A single column of runes stretches each symbol into a full band; a runic block tiles cyclically until every stone has been honored.
Grid: 10x10 dark stone. Grey temple walls persist. Runes fill the rectangular chamber floor. Unmarked stone remains dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Grey temple walls form L-shaped thresholds. Colored runes are inscribed at the corner. One wall counts the chanting stones; the other bears the runic inscription. What to do: Chant the runes along the wall, etching the pattern across the floor for every stone. A single column of runes stretches each symbol into a full band; a runic block tiles cyclically until every stone has been honored." Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming L-shaped walls (like a border of X's). At the corner of the L there is a block of colored cells (runes). The rule seems to replicate that block across the interior area defined by the L shape, by tiling horizontally and vertically? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input: a vertical line of X from (1,1?) Actually grid 10x10. Row indices 0-9. Input shows row1 (index1) has X X X X X X X from col1 to col7? Actually row1: ". X X X X X X . . ." So a horizontal line of X across columns 1-6? Wait there are 7 X's? Let's count: positions: col0 '.'; col1 X; col2 X; col3 X; col4 X; col5 X; col6 X; col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'. So a horizontal line of X from col1 to col6 inclusive (6? Actually 1-6 inclusive is 6 cells). That's a wall. Also there is a column of X? Not in example1. The L shape maybe formed by that horizontal line and a vertical line of X? Let's see other rows: rows 2-7 have '.' at col0 then colored rune at col1 (R, B, R, M, B, B). So there is a vertical line of colored runes at column1, not X. The X line is only row1. So L shape maybe: the X line is the "wall" that counts stones? Actually description: one wall counts the chanting stones; the other bears the runic inscription. So maybe the X line is the counting wall (grey). The colored runes are at the corner (the cell at intersection of X line and first column of runes). In example1, the corner cell is at row1 col1? That's X, not colored. Wait colored runes start at row2 col1 (R). So the corner maybe at row2 col1? Not sure. The output: The colored runes are extended horizontally across the same rows as the X line? Let's see output rows 2-7 (indices 2-7) have the same colored pattern but repeated across columns 1-6 (matching length of X line). Indeed row2 (index2) originally had R at col1, output has R repeated across col1-6. Row3 B repeated across col1-6. Row4 R repeated across col1-6. Row5 M repeated across col1-6. Row6 B repeated across col1-6. Row7 B repeated across col1-6. So rule: take the column of colored cells adjacent to the X line (the "rune column") and replicate each cell horizontally across the length of the X line (the "wall"). Thus the X line defines width of replication. The colored column defines pattern to replicate. Example2: Input: there is a vertical line of X in column0 rows0-8? Actually rows0-8 have X at col0 (first column). Row0 has '.' at col0? Wait row0: ". . . . . . . . . ." no X. Row1: "X . . . . . . . . ." So X at (1,0). Row2 also X at (2,0) etc up to row7. Row8 also X at (8,0). So ver ... [11370 chars truncated]
"A choreographer places dancers in a formation at the corner of the stage, then the formation kicks-and-steps across the floor, repeating its shape for every beat counted along the barre."
120b: k=3
See: Grey barres form L-shaped stage edges. Colored dancers hold formation at the corner. One barre counts the beats; the formation fills the other arm.
Do: Step the formation along the barre, repeating it for every beat. A single line of dancers stretches each performer's color across the full count; a group formation tiles cyclically across the floor.
Grid: 10x10 dark stage. Grey barres persist. Dancers fill the rectangular performance area. Empty stage remains dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey barres form L-shaped stage edges. In examples, grey X forms an L shape: a vertical bar on left side and a horizontal bar at top? Let's examine. Example1 input: grid 10x10. Row1 all . Row2: . X X X X X X . . . So a horizontal line of X from col2 to col8 (positions 2-8). Also column1? Actually row2 col1 is '.'; column1 rows 3-8 have '.'? Let's see: rows3-8 have . R . etc. So vertical bar? Not present. Wait maybe the L shape is vertical bar at column2? Let's view: In example1, column2 rows2-8 are X? Row2 col2 X, row3 col2 R (not X). So not vertical X. So L shape maybe the horizontal bar only? But description says L-shaped stage edges: grey barres persist. In example2 input: first column has X from rows2-9 (vertical line). Also row8 has X at col1? Actually row8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . So column1 row8 X. Also row9 column1 X. So vertical bar of X at column1 rows2-9. Also there is a horizontal bar? Row1? No. So L shape maybe vertical bar plus a horizontal bar at bottom? In example2, there is also X at row8 col1? That's part of vertical. No horizontal. Example3 input: top row has X from col7-10 (horizontal). Also column1 rows2-9 have X (vertical). So that's an L shape: vertical bar at column1 rows2-9, horizontal bar at row1 col7-10. So L shape with corner at (row1,col1?) Actually they intersect? Not intersect; they are separate arms meeting at corner? The corner would be at (row2,col1?) Not exactly. In example3, vertical bar at col1 rows2-9, horizontal bar at row1 cols7-10. They form an L shape with corner at (row2,col7?) No. But description: "Grey barres form L-shaped stage edges. Colored dancers hold formation at the corner. One barre counts the beats; the formation fills the other arm." So one arm (the "beat" bar) is the vertical bar maybe, and the other arm (the "formation") is the horizontal bar where colored pattern repeats. In example1, there is only horizontal bar (row2). No vertical. So maybe the vertical is missing because the corner is at left side? Actually there is a vertical bar of X? Not in example1. Let's examine example1 output: The colored pattern (R,B,R,M,B,B) originally placed in column2 rows3-8 (vertical). In output, those colors are extended horizontally across the horizontal bar region (row2?). Wait output shows row3: . R R R R R R . . . So row3 originally had R at col2, now row3 has R across columns2-7 (same length as horizontal bar). Similarly row4 B across columns2-7, etc. So the horizontal bar (row2) is the "beat" bar that counts beats, and the formation (vertical column of colors) is tiled across that horizontal bar, replicating each color across the length of the bar. Thus rule: There is a vertical line of colored cells (non-grey) at a certain column, adjacent to a horizontal line of grey X cells at a certain row (forming an L shape). The vertical colored column is the "formation". The horizontal grey line is the "beat" bar. The transformation replicates each colored cell horizo ... [11941 chars truncated]
"A mineral vein is exposed at the bend of a fault line; tectonic pressure folds the vein's layered strata across the rock face for as many meters as the fault extends."
120b: k=2
See: Grey fault lines form L-shaped fractures. Colored mineral layers are exposed at the bend. One arm of the fault measures the fold distance; the other reveals the mineral strata.
Do: Fold the mineral strata along the fault line. A single-layer vein stretches each mineral into a uniform band across the rock face; a multi-layer deposit tiles its pattern cyclically for the full length of the fault.
Grid: 10x10 dark bedrock. Grey fault lines persist. Mineral bands fill the rectangular fold region. Solid bedrock remains dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey fault lines form L-shaped fractures. Colored mineral layers are exposed at the bend. One arm of the fault measures the fold distance; the other reveals the mineral strata. Fold the mineral strata along the fault line. A single-layer vein stretches each mineral into a uniform band across the rock face; a multi-layer deposit tiles its pattern cyclically for the full length of the fault. Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming an L shape (vertical and horizontal). The region inside the L (the rectangle?) contains colored cells (maybe a pattern). Output: replicate that pattern across the L arms? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input: 10x10. Grey X line: row1? Actually row index starting 0? Input shows second row (row1) has X X X X X X X from columns1-7 (0-index?). So a horizontal line of X from column1 to7 at row1. Also column1 (col1) from row2 to7 have colored cells: at (2,1) R, (3,1) B, (4,1) R, (5,1) M, (6,1) B, (7,1) B. So vertical line of X? Wait column0? Actually X's are at column1? Let's map: Row0 all '.'; Row1: . X X X X X X . . . (col0 '.' col1 X etc). Row2: . R . . . . . . . . So at column1 there is R. Row3: . B ... column1 B. Row4: . R ... Row5: . M ... Row6: . B ... Row7: . B ... So there is a vertical line of colored cells at column1, but not X. The X line is horizontal at row1 from col1 to col7. So the L shape is comprised of the X line (horizontal) and the vertical line of colored cells? But description says grey fault lines persist. In output, the X line remains same. The colored cells have been expanded horizontally across the same rows as they appear, filling from column1 to column6? Let's see output row2: . R R R R R R . . . So original R at column1 expanded to fill columns1-6 (six cells) (since X line length is 7? Actually columns1-6 inclusive? The X line goes from col1 to col7 (7 cells). In output, the band extends to column6 (maybe up to before the last X?). Let's check: Row2 output: . R R R R R R . . . That's 7 R's? Count: positions col1-col6? That's 6? Wait there are 6 R's after the leading '.'? Let's count: characters: '.' then 'R' then 'R' then 'R' then 'R' then 'R' then 'R' then '.' ... That's 6 R's? Actually there are 6 R's after the first '.'? Let's count indices: col0 '.'; col1 'R'; col2 'R'; col3 'R'; col4 'R'; col5 'R'; col6 'R'; col7 '.'; So 6 R's from col1 to col6 inclusive (6 cells). The X line length is 7 cells from col1 to col7 inclusive. So the band stops one before the X line's end? Maybe the band fills up to column before the X line's end (col6). Similarly row3 output: . B B B B B B . . . (B from col1 to col6). Row4: . R R R R R R . . . Row5: . M M M M M M . . . Row6: . B B B B B B . . . Row7: . B B B B B B . . . So each colored cell row is expanded horizontally to fill columns 1-6 (i.e., length equal to number of X's minus 1). So rule: For each row that contains a colored cell in the column where the vertical arm meets the horizontal arm (i.e., column of t ... [11590 chars truncated]
"A baker pipes a thin line of decorative frosting along the edge of a sheet cake, then drags a comb across the surface to streak the design from edge to edge."
120b: k=2
See: Grey fondant borders form L-shaped edges on a dark chocolate sheet. Colored frosting stripes or patterned sugar tiles sit along one edge of each L. The other edge is bare fondant.
Do: Drag the pattern from the decorated edge across the full span of the bare edge. Single stripes become full bands of icing; tiled patterns repeat their motif cyclically until the bare edge is fully covered.
Grid: 10x10 dark chocolate base. Grey fondant borders remain. Frosted regions fill rectangles bounded by the L-shaped edges. Undecorated areas stay dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: L-shaped borders of grey (X) form edges. Colored stripes or tiled patterns sit along one edge of each L. The other edge is bare. Drag pattern across bare edge, filling full rectangle. Look at examples. Example1 input: grid 10x10. Grey X's form a horizontal line row1? Actually row index 1 (0-based?) Let's view. Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: . X X X X X X . . . 2: . R . . . . . . . . 3: . B . . . . . . . . 4: . R . . . . . . . . 5: . M . . . . . . . . 6: . B . . . . . . . . 7: . B . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . So grey X's form a horizontal line from column1 to column6 on row1 (index1). That's the top edge of L? The L shape likely consists of that horizontal line plus a vertical line down column1? Actually column0 has '.' except row1? Wait column0 has '.' all rows. So L shape maybe the grey line plus the leftmost column? Not present. Let's see pattern: colored cells (R,B,M) are in column1 rows2-7 (vertical line). Indeed column1 rows2-7 have colors: row2 R, row3 B, row4 R, row5 M, row6 B, row7 B. So the L shape is comprised of the grey horizontal line (row1 columns1-6) and the vertical line (column1 rows2-7). The colored pattern sits along one edge of L: which edge? The vertical edge (column1) has colored cells; the horizontal edge (row1) is just grey X's (no colors). So the rule: replicate the pattern from the colored edge across the blank edge (the horizontal edge) to fill rectangle bounded by L. Output shows that rows2-7 columns2-7 are filled with same colors as column1 pattern repeated across horizontally. Indeed output rows2-7 columns2-7 become same color as column1 for each row. So we copy each row's color across the horizontal span. Thus rule: Identify L shape formed by grey X's: a contiguous line of X's forming a corner (horizontal and vertical). One of the two legs contains colored cells (non-X, non-.) that form a pattern (either single stripe or tiled pattern). The other leg is just X's (no colors). The rectangle defined by the legs (including interior) is currently empty (dots). Fill interior by extending the pattern from the colored leg across to the other leg, replicating horizontally or vertically as appropriate. Example2: Input: Grey X's form vertical line column0 rows1-8? Let's see rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: X . . . . . . . . . Row2: X . . . . . . . . . Row3: X . . . . . . . . . Row4: X . . . . . . . . . Row5: X . . . . . . . . . Row6: X . . . . . . . . . Row7: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . Row8: X O G O O G G . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . So X's form vertical line column0 rows1-8. That's one leg. The other leg is horizontal line? At row7 and row8 there are colored patterns starting at column1 onward. The horizontal edge of L is row7? Actually the L shape includes the vertical line and a horizontal line at row7? But row7 has X at column0 and then colored cells Y G G Y Y Y etc. Row8 also has X at column0 and colored O G O O G G. So the horizontal edge ... [11982 chars truncated]
"A short musical phrase is written at the foot of a staff, and each measure line of the staff demands the phrase be played again — the riff loops until the staff runs out of bars."
120b: fail
See: Grey bar lines form perpendicular staffs. At the corner where two staffs meet, a colored motif — a chord or a melodic phrase — is notated. One staff counts the repeats; the other carries the motif.
Do: Replay the motif along the counting staff. A single-note-per-line motif stretches each pitch into a sustained tone across the full measure. A multi-line arrangement tiles as a repeating loop.
Grid: 10x10 silent background. Grey bar lines persist. The filled rectangular region between the staffs rings with the repeated motif. Silence remains outside.
We need to understand the puzzle. It's an ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) style problem. Input grid 10x10 with colors. Grey bar lines (X) form perpendicular staffs: likely a vertical line of X and a horizontal line of X intersecting at a corner. In example 1, input shows a horizontal line of X from column 1 to 6 (0-index?) Actually grid: row1 (index0) all .; row2 has . X X X X X X . . . (so row index1 has X from col1 to col6). Also column? There is a vertical line of X? Let's see: In example 1, column 0? Actually row0 col0 '.'; row1 col0 '.'; row2 col0 '.'; row3 col0 '.'; etc. The vertical line maybe at column 1? Let's examine: In rows 2-8, there is a colored cell at column1 (R, B, R, M, B, B). So column1 has colored cells but also X? Wait column1 row2 is R, not X. So vertical line of X maybe at column? Look at input rows: row2: ". R . . . . . . . ." So column1 is R. Row3: ". B . . . . . . . ." column1 B. So vertical line of X is not there. Actually the X line is horizontal only? But description says perpendicular staffs (two lines). In example 1, there is also a vertical line of X at column? Let's check each row for X: row1 has X at columns1-6. Row2 has no X. Row3 none. Row4 none. Row5 none. Row6 none. Row7 none. Row8 none. Row9 none. So only one line of X. But description says grey bar lines persist. Maybe there is also a vertical line of X at column? Wait row0? No. So maybe the vertical line is the leftmost column of X? Not present. Hmm. Maybe the "bars" are the rectangle formed by X lines: In example 1, there is a horizontal line of X across row1 columns1-6, and also a vertical line of X at column6 rows1-? Actually row1 col6 is X, row2 col6 is '.'; row3 col6 '.'; So not. Let's examine shape: The rectangle region between the staffs is the area bounded by the X lines: maybe the X lines form a border: top horizontal line row1 col1-6, left vertical line column1 rows2-8? But column1 rows2-8 have colored cells (R,B,R,M,B,B) not X. So maybe the vertical line is column6? Let's see column6 rows2-8: row2 col6 '.'; row3 col6 '.'; etc. So not. Thus maybe the "bars" are just the X line(s) that remain unchanged in output. In output, the X line remains same. The region "between the staffs" is the rectangle to the right of the X line? In example, the rectangle region between the staffs rings with repeated motif. The motif is the colored pattern at the corner where two staffs meet. In example, the corner is at the intersection of the horizontal X line and the vertical line of colored cells? Actually the colored motif is at the corner where two staffs meet. In example, the corner is at (row2, col1) maybe? That's where the first colored cell R is located adjacent to the X line? Let's map coordinates: Row indices 0-9, col 0-9. Input example1: Row1 (index1) has X from col1 to col6. Row2 (index2) has R at col1. Row3 (3) B at col1. Row4 (4) R at col1. Row5 (5) M at col1. Row6 (6) B at col1. Row7 (7) B at col1. So there is a column of colored cells at co ... [10099 chars truncated]
"A coach draws a play on a whiteboard: the sideline marks the distance, and each player in the lineup sprints their lane across the full width of the field."
120b: k=2
See: Grey sidelines form L-shaped boundaries on a dark field. Colored players line up along one arm of the L. The other arm marks the length of the field they must cover.
Do: Each player runs their lane from the lineup across the field for the full distance marked by the sideline. A single file of players fills parallel lanes; a formation block repeats its pattern cyclically across the distance.
Grid: 10x10 dark field. Grey sidelines remain. Player lanes fill the rectangle bounded by the L. Empty field stays dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey sidelines form L-shaped boundaries on a dark field. Colored players line up along one arm of the L. The other arm marks the length of the field they must cover. Each player runs their lane from the lineup across the field for the full distance marked by the sideline. A single file of players fills parallel lanes; a formation block repeats its pattern cyclically across the distance. Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming an L shape: vertical line down left side? In examples. Example1 input: Row1 all .; Row2: . X X X X X X . . . (so a horizontal line of X from col2 to col7). Then rows3-8 have a single X? Actually rows3-8 column2? Let's see: row3: . R . . . . . . . . (col2 is R). No X there. Wait the L shape: In example1, the X's are only in row2 columns2-7 (horizontal). No vertical line? But description says L-shaped boundaries: maybe the vertical arm is column2 rows2-8? Let's check: In input example1, column2 rows2-8 are: row2 col2 = X, row3 col2 = R (not X), row4 col2 = B, row5 col2 = R, row6 col2 = M, row7 col2 = B, row8 col2 = B. So only row2 has X. So L shape maybe consists of a horizontal line of X and a vertical line of X at column? Not present. But output example1: The colored cells (R,B,R,M,B,B) have been expanded horizontally across the rectangle bounded by the X line? Indeed output rows3-8 columns2-7 are filled with the same color repeated across the width of the X line (col2-7). So the X line defines the width (distance) of the lane. The colored cells originally at column2 (the "lineup") are replicated across to column7. Thus rule: Find the contiguous block of X's forming a line (maybe horizontal) that defines the rectangle width. The colored cells that are aligned vertically along the column adjacent to X line (maybe column2) are replicated horizontally across to fill rectangle between the X line and the opposite side (maybe until before a dot). The pattern repeats for each row within the vertical range of colored cells. Example2: Input: X's form a vertical line at column1 rows2-9 (since first column). Also there is a horizontal line? Actually row8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (col1 X). Row9: X O G O O G G . . . So X's are column1 rows2-9. That's a vertical line. The colored pattern appears in rows8-9 columns2-7 (Y G G Y Y Y etc). In output, the pattern is repeated vertically across rows2-9, filling rectangle to the right of X line (columns2-7). Indeed output rows2-9 columns2-7 are alternating Y G G Y Y Y and O G O O G G repeating each row. So the original pattern (two rows) is repeated downwards to fill the rectangle defined by the X vertical line length. Thus rule: Identify the L-shaped grey boundary: one arm is a line of X (either horizontal or vertical) that defines the length of rectangle; the other arm is the line of X at the start of the rectangle? Actually the L shape comprises the X line (horizontal or vertical) and the adjacent side of the rectangle (the side where colored pl ... [11917 chars truncated]
"A weather front stalls against a mountain ridge, and the bands of precipitation it carries are stretched across the valley by prevailing winds blowing along the ridgeline."
120b: k=1
See: Grey ridgelines form angular barriers. Colored precipitation bands — rain, hail, sleet — cluster at the elbow of each ridge. One arm channels the wind; the other holds the storm's signature.
Do: The wind pushes the precipitation pattern along the ridge's length, smearing each band across the valley floor. Single-layer fronts stretch into uniform sheets; layered storm cells tile repeatedly until the ridge ends.
Grid: 10x10 clear sky. Grey ridges persist. Precipitation fills the valley rectangle bounded by the ridge arms. Clear sky remains elsewhere.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10. Grey ridge X forms a vertical line? Let's view example1 input. Row0 all . Row1: . X X X X X X . . . Row2: . R . . . . . . . . Row3: . B . . . . . . . . Row4: . R . . . . . . . . Row5: . M . . . . . . . . Row6: . B . . . . . . . . Row7: . B . . . . . . . . Rows8-9 all . So ridge: row1 columns1-6 are X (horizontal line). Actually it's a horizontal ridge across row1. The "arms" maybe vertical columns? The precipitation (colored cells) are placed below the ridge? In input, colored cells are in column1? Let's see coordinates: column1 (index1) has R at row2, B at row3, R at row4, M at row5, B at row6, B at row7. So a vertical line of colored cells directly under the ridge at column1. The ridge is horizontal line above them. Output: same ridge unchanged. The colored cells have been expanded horizontally across the valley rectangle bounded by ridge arms. Output rows2-7 columns1-6 are filled with the same color as original column1, replicating across the ridge length (columns1-6). Indeed row2 becomes R across columns1-6. Row3 B across columns1-6. Row4 R across columns1-6. Row5 M across columns1-6. Row6 B across columns1-6. Row7 B across columns1-6. Thus rule: For each column under the ridge (i.e., within the rectangle bounded by ridge arms), the color pattern from the "source column" (the column where colored cells originally appear) is replicated horizontally across the ridge length (i.e., across the X ridge's columns). Essentially, the ridge defines a horizontal band; the precipitation column(s) are at the leftmost side of the valley (maybe at the elbow). The wind pushes them along ridge length, smearing each band across valley floor. So algorithm: Identify the contiguous block of X cells forming a line (ridge). Determine its orientation: In example it's horizontal line (row1). The ridge arms: likely the ends of the line. The valley rectangle is the area directly below (or above?) the ridge, bounded by the ridge's columns (i.e., same columns as X). The precipitation cells are located in the column at the "elbow" (maybe the first column after ridge start). In example, they are in column1 (the first column of ridge). They extend vertically downwards. The transformation: For each row within the valley rectangle (i.e., rows below ridge until maybe a blank row or end), fill the cells in the columns spanned by ridge with the color found in that row's original column (the source column). So copy the color horizontally across the ridge width. Now test input. Let's parse test input grid 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: X X X X X . X . . . Row2: Y . . . . . X . . . Row3: R . . . . . X . . . Row4: R . . . . . X . . . Row5: R . . . . . X . . . Row6: B . . . . . X . . . Row7: . . . . . . X A M A Row8: . . . . . . X G G G Row9: . . . . . . . . . . Let's locate ridge X pattern. Row1 has X at cols0-4, then col5 is ., col6 X, others . . . So there is a horizontal line ... [11102 chars truncated]
"A corner column and its two connecting beams define a bay window; the stained glass pattern in the transom is repeated in every pane down the full height of the frame."
120b: fail
See: Grey beams form L-shaped structural frames. A stained glass pattern — one or more rows of colored panes — sits where the beams join. One beam sets the height; the pattern fills the width.
Do: Replicate the transom pattern downward (or across) to fill every bay in the frame. A single row of colored panes becomes repeated horizontal bands; a multi-row tile repeats cyclically through the full frame height.
Grid: 10x10 dark facade. Grey structural beams remain. Stained glass fills the rectangular bay. Unglazed wall stays dark.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid 10x10. Grey beams X form L-shaped frames. In example, there is a vertical beam column of X from row1? Let's examine example1. Input example1 grid (10x10). I'll index rows 0-9, columns 0-9. Row0: all . (black) Row1: . X X X X X X . . . Row2: . R . . . . . . . . Row3: . B . . . . . . . . Row4: . R . . . . . . . . Row5: . M . . . . . . . . Row6: . B . . . . . . . . Row7: . B . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . So there is a horizontal beam row1 columns1-6 (X). Also vertical beam column1 rows1-7? Actually column1 has X at row1, and then at rows2-7 there are colored cells (R,B,R,M,B,B) not X. Wait vertical beam maybe column0? Let's see column0 has '.' except row1 '.'? Actually column0 row1 is '.' not X. So the L shape: The beam is horizontal line of X at row1 columns1-6, and vertical line of X at column1 rows1? Actually column1 row1 is X, but column1 rows2-7 are colored not X. So vertical beam maybe column6? Let's examine column6: row1 X, rows2-7 '.'? Actually row2 column6 '.'; row3 column6 '.' etc. So not. Maybe the L shape is comprised of X's forming a corner: row1 columns1-6 (horizontal) and column1 rows1-? but only row1 has X at column1; there is no vertical continuation of X. Wait maybe the L shape is defined by the rectangle of X's: The X's form the top and left edges of a rectangular frame (like a transom). In example, the X's are at row1 columns1-6 (top edge) and column1 rows1-? Actually column1 rows1-? maybe also X's downwards but they are not present. So maybe the L shape is just the top edge and left edge of the rectangle, but left edge is just a single X at the corner (row1 col1). That seems odd. But the description: "Grey beams form L-shaped structural frames. A stained glass pattern — one or more rows of colored panes — sits where the beams join. One beam sets the height; the pattern fills the width." So there is an L-shaped beam: one beam vertical (height) and one horizontal (width). The intersection area (the rectangular bay) is filled with colored pattern rows. The pattern is originally given as a set of rows of colored cells within the rectangle, starting at the corner where beams meet (top-left of rectangle). The rule replicates the pattern across the rectangle: fill each row of the rectangle with the pattern row repeated across width; if multiple rows, repeat cyclically down height. In example, the pattern appears as a single column of colored cells (since only column0? Actually the colored cells are in column1? Let's see: In input, colored cells are at column1 rows2-7 (R,B,R,M,B,B). So they form a vertical column of colors. The rectangle width is 6 (columns1-6). Height is maybe 7? Actually rows1-7? The top beam row1 defines top edge; the vertical beam maybe column1 defines left edge? But there is no X vertical line; maybe the left edge is implied by the column of colored cells? Hmm. But output shows that the colored column is expanded h ... [12036 chars truncated]
"A signal flag sequence is hoisted at the yardarm of a mast; each deck of the warship below repeats the signal in semaphore, from crow's nest to waterline."
120b: k=3
See: Grey masts and yardarms form L-shaped signal posts. Colored signal flags hang at the junction. One arm counts the decks; the other carries the flag code.
Do: Broadcast the flag sequence to every deck along the mast. A single column of flags extends each color across the full yardarm width; a block of flag patterns tiles repeatedly down the mast's length.
Grid: 10x10 dark sea. Grey masts and yardarms persist. Signal colors fill the rectangular rigging area. Open sea remains dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey masts (X) and yardarms form L-shaped signal posts. Colored flags at junction. One arm counts decks; other carries flag code. Broadcast flag sequence to every deck along mast. A single column of flags extends each color across full yardarm width; a block of flag patterns tiles repeatedly down the mast's length. Interpretation: Input has an L shape of X (grey) forming a vertical column and a horizontal row at top? Let's examine examples. Example1 input: grid 10x10. Row1 all . Row2: . X X X X X X . . . (so a horizontal line of X from col2 to col8). Then column of X? Actually rows 3-8 have . R . etc at col2? Wait row3: . R . . . . . . . . So at column2 there is R (red). Row4: . B . ... column2 B. Row5: . R . ... column2 R. Row6: . M . ... column2 M. Row7: . B . ... column2 B. Row8: . B . ... column2 B. So there is a vertical line of colored cells at column2, below the horizontal X line (row2). So the L shape: horizontal X line row2 columns2-8, vertical column of X? Actually there is no vertical X, just colored cells. The X line is only horizontal. The vertical "mast" maybe the column of X? But there is no X in column2 rows3-8. So maybe the L shape is formed by X's: horizontal line row2 columns2-8, and vertical line column1? Wait column1 has '.' except row2 col1 '.'; not. Let's look at Example2 input: Row1 all . Row2: X . . . . . . . . . (X at col1). Row3: X . . . . . . . . . (col1). Row4: X . . . . . . . . . (col1). Row5: X . . . . . . . . . (col1). Row6: X . . . . . . . . . (col1). Row7: X . . . . . . . . . (col1). Row8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (col1 X, col2 Y, col3 G...). Row9: X O G O O G G . . . (col1 X, col2 O...). Row10 all . So we have vertical line of X from rows2-9 at column1. Also there is a horizontal line of X? Not; only column1. So L shape maybe vertical X line (mast) and horizontal X line at bottom? Actually row8 and row9 have X at col1 as part of vertical line, but also there is a block of colors to the right of that column, forming a rectangle (rows8-9, cols2-?). In output, the colored block (Y G etc) is tiled vertically down the mast length: The pattern of rows8-9 (two rows) repeats for rows2-7 as well, filling column2 onward? Let's see output Example2: Row2: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (same as row8). Row3: X O G O O G G . . . (same as row9). Row4: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (repeat). Row5: X O G O O G G . . . (repeat). Row6: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (repeat). Row7: X O G O O G G . . . (repeat). Row8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (original). Row9: X O G O O G G . . . (original). So indeed the colored block (2 rows) is tiled repeatedly up the vertical mast (column of X). The X column remains unchanged (still X). The rest of grid outside the L shape (i.e., beyond the rectangle) remains '.'. Thus rule: Identify the L-shaped region formed by X's: a vertical line of X (mast) and a horizontal line of X (yardarm) intersecting at a corner (the junction). At the junction, there is a colored pattern (a block) extending to th ... [11504 chars truncated]
"A spotlight gel is placed at the wing of the stage, and as the lighting rig sweeps along its track, the colored pattern is projected across every row of the set."
120b: k=4
See: Grey lighting tracks form L-shaped rigs at the edges of a dark stage. Colored gels sit where the tracks meet. One track determines the sweep distance; the gels determine the color pattern.
Do: Sweep the gel pattern along the track, projecting it across the stage. A single strip of gels paints parallel color washes; a composite gel arrangement tiles its design repeatedly across the sweep.
Grid: 10x10 dark stage. Grey tracks remain. Colored light fills the rectangular stage area bounded by the rig. Unlit stage stays dark.
We need to infer rule. From description: Grey tracks (X) form L-shaped rigs at edges. Colored gels sit where tracks meet. One track determines sweep distance; gels determine color pattern. Sweep gel pattern along track, projecting across stage. A single strip of gels paints parallel color washes; a composite gel arrangement tiles its design repeatedly across the sweep. Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming a line (maybe vertical/horizontal) that defines a rectangle region (rig). At the intersection (where X meets colored cells) there is a pattern of colored cells (gel). The pattern is repeated (tiled) across the rectangle defined by the X track length (sweep distance). Essentially we copy the pattern horizontally or vertically across the area bounded by X. Look at examples. Example1: Input: Row1 all .; Row2: . X X X X X X . . . (a horizontal line of X from col2 to col8). Then below that column 2 has colored cells: at rows3-8 column2: R, B, R, M, B, B respectively. So X line is horizontal, and colored cells are a vertical strip at column2 (just under the X line). Output: The colored vertical strip is extended horizontally across the same columns as X line (col2-8). So each row that had a colored cell at column2 now has that color repeated across columns 2-8 (the length of X line). So rule: For each row within the region bounded by X line (the horizontal line), replicate the color across the X line's length. Thus the X line defines sweep direction perpendicular to its orientation: horizontal X line sweeps vertically? Actually the pattern is vertical (single column) and sweeps horizontally across X line. Example2: Input: X column at leftmost column (col1) rows2-9 (vertical line). At bottom rows8-9 there is a pattern of colors in columns2-? Actually rows8: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . ; row9: X O G O O G G . . . . So the colored pattern is a 2-row block to the right of the X column, starting at column2. Output: The pattern is tiled vertically along the X column length: The 2-row pattern repeats for each X row (rows2-9). Indeed output rows2-9 each have the pattern of rows8-9 alternating? Let's see output: rows2: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (same as original row8). row3: X O G O O G G . . . (same as original row9). row4: X Y G G Y Y Y . . . (repeat). So pattern of two rows repeats downwards along the X column. So vertical X line sweeps horizontally? Actually pattern is to the right of X column, and repeats vertically along the X column. Thus rule: Identify the contiguous line of X that forms an L shape? In examples, it's either a straight line (horizontal or vertical). In example3: Input has X forming a shape: top row has X X X X from col7-10 (horizontal). Also column1 has X from rows2-9 (vertical). So they form an L shape: vertical line at col1 rows2-9, horizontal line at row1 col7-10. The colored pattern is in the rectangle bounded by the L? Let's examine: The colored cells are in region rows2-8, columns2-6 maybe? Actually there are colored cells at pos ... [12048 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants a row of flowers along a border wall's corner, then extends the same planting scheme into parallel furrows for as many rows as the wall is long."
120b: k=1
See: Grey garden walls form L-shaped borders. Colored flowers are planted along one arm of the wall at the corner. The other arm measures how many furrows to dig.
Do: Extend the planting pattern into parallel furrows matching the wall's length. A single-file flower row sends each variety across as a full stripe; a multi-row bed tiles its arrangement cyclically to fill the plot.
Grid: 10x10 dark soil. Grey walls persist. Flowers fill the rectangular bed bounded by the L-shaped walls. Bare soil remains elsewhere.
We need to infer rule. From description: L-shaped grey walls (X) form borders. Colored flowers planted along one arm of the wall at the corner. The other arm measures how many furrows to dig. Extend planting pattern into parallel furrows matching wall's length. Single-file flower row sends each variety across as a full stripe; a multi-row bed tiles its arrangement cyclically to fill the plot. Interpretation: Input grid has grey X forming an L shape: a vertical line of X and a horizontal line of X meeting at a corner. Inside the L shape (the rectangle bounded by the two arms) there are colored cells (non-X) placed in some pattern along the corner arm (maybe the top row of the rectangle). The other arm length determines number of rows to replicate pattern. In Example1: Input shows X line row 2 (index1) from col1 to col6 (0-index?). Actually grid 10x10. Row1 (0) all .; Row2 (1) has . X X X X X X . . . (so X from col1 to col6). That's horizontal arm. Also column1 (col1) from row2 downwards? Let's see: rows 2-7 have colored cells at column1 (col1) positions: row2 col1 is X (already part of arm). Row3 col1 is R, row4 col1 B, row5 col1 R, row6 col1 M, row7 col1 B, row8 col1 B. So vertical arm of X is only at row1? Actually only row1? Wait X vertical maybe column0? Let's map coordinates: Using 0-index columns. Row0: all . Row1: col0 '.' col1 X col2 X col3 X col4 X col5 X col6 X col7 '.'... So horizontal arm from (1,1) to (1,6). Also there is vertical arm maybe column1 from row1 downwards? Row2 col1 is R (not X). So vertical arm is not X but maybe the wall is only the horizontal X line, and the other arm is the column of colored cells? But description says grey walls persist. In output, X remain same. In output, the colored pattern (R,B,R,M,B,B) originally in column1 rows2-7 is extended horizontally across the rectangle bounded by X line (i.e., rows2-7, columns1-6) replicating each row's color across the width (columns1-6). Indeed output rows2-7 have colors repeated across columns1-6. Thus rule: For each row that lies within the rectangle defined by the L-shaped X border (i.e., rows below the horizontal X line and columns to the right of the vertical X line?), we fill the interior with the pattern from the first column (the "seed" column) repeated across the width. But also there could be multi-row pattern tiling cyclically. In example only single column pattern. Now test input: Let's map. Grid 10x10. Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: X X X X X . X . . . Row2: Y . . . . . X . . . Row3: R . . . . . X . . . Row4: R . . . . . X . . . Row5: R . . . . . X . . . Row6: B . . . . . X . . . Row7: . . . . . . X A M A Row8: . . . . . . X G G G Row9: . . . . . . . . . . We need to identify L-shaped X border. There is a horizontal line of X at row1 columns0-4, column6 also X? Actually row1: X X X X X . X . . . So X at cols0-4, and also at col6. That's a break: maybe the vertical arm is column6 (col6) from row1 downwards (rows1-8). Indeed column6 has X at rows1 ... [11790 chars truncated]
See: The input is a large grid divided into a smaller grid of rectangular cells by single-width separator lines of a uniform color (e.g., azure or red). Each cell is a square block of identical pixels — either filled with a non-separator, non-black color (like blue, green, red) or empty (all black/dot). The separator lines form a complete lattice of horizontal and vertical bands, creating an N×M arrangement of equally-sized cells.
Do: 1. Identify the separator color — the color that forms complete horizontal and vertical lines spanning the full grid width/height. 2. Use these separator lines to segment the grid into a matrix of rectangular cells. 3. Reduce each cell to a single value: if the cell is filled with a non-separator color, record that color; if the cell is all black (dots), record black (dot). This produces a small abstract grid. 4. Flip this abstract grid horizontally — reverse the order of columns (mirror left to right). 5. Output the resulting flipped grid.
Grid: The output grid has dimensions equal to the number of cell-rows by the number of cell-columns in the input's lattice structure. Each pixel in the output represents one cell from the input. The background color is black (dot). The output contains only the cell-fill colors and black — the separator color does not appear in the output.
"A stained-glass window reflected in a still pool of water"
120b: k=1
See: A cathedral window is divided into panes by leading — thin, unbroken veins of a single bold color that run from edge to edge, both across and down, forming a lattice. Each pane between the leading is either filled with a jewel-tone color or left as clear dark glass.
Do: Stand before the window and read each pane as a single gemstone — sapphire, emerald, ruby, or empty night. Arrange these gems into a mosaic matching the window's layout. Now walk to the reflecting pool on the opposite side of the chapel: the water mirrors the window, swapping left for right, so what hung on the eastern edge now shimmers on the west. Record what the water shows you.
Grid: The reflection is a small mosaic — one stone per pane. The leading itself dissolves in the water and never appears in the reflection. Only the jewel colors and the darkness between them remain, painted in the pool's quiet reversal.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid with leading lines? The description: leading are thin veins of single bold color that run across and down, forming a lattice. They are removed in output, only colors inside panes remain, reflected horizontally (mirror left-right). So we need to identify the "leading" color: likely azure 'A' maybe? In example, input shows many A forming grid lines (vertical and horizontal). The output is 4x4 grid (since there are 4 panes?). Let's examine example 1. We have input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 19 rows (since pattern). Output is 4 rows, 4 columns. The leading likely are the A's forming a grid of 5x5? Let's think: The input seems to have a pattern: top left area of '.' (black) then A column? Actually first rows: ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." repeated 4 rows. So there is a vertical line of A at column 5, then a block of R's, then A at column 10, then block of '.' then A at column 15 etc. So A's are vertical lines. Also there are horizontal lines of A rows: row 5 is all A's. Row 10 is ". . . . A . . . . A B B B B A . . . ." etc. Row 15 is all A's. Row 20? Actually there are 19 rows, with A rows at 5,10,15? Let's see: after row 4, row5 is all A's. Then rows 6-9 have pattern with A at start and after B block etc. Row10 is ". . . . A . . . . A B B B B A . . . ." etc. Row11-14 similar. Row15 is all A's. Row16-19 have pattern with G etc. So the A's form a grid dividing into 4x4 panes (since there are 3 vertical lines and 3 horizontal lines, making 4x4 cells). The colors inside each pane are either a solid color (R, B, G) or '.' (black). The output is 4x4 where each cell corresponds to a pane, showing the dominant color? Let's map. Pane positions: top-left pane (rows 1-4, cols 1-4) are '.' (black). Output top-left is '.'? Output first row first column is '.' (they show .). Indeed output first row: ". . R ." So first cell '.' matches. Top row second pane (rows1-4, cols6-9) contains R's. Output first row second column is '.'? Wait output first row second column is '.' (they have .). Actually output first row: ". . R ." So columns: 1 '.'; 2 '.'; 3 'R'; 4 '.'. So the pane with R's appears at column3. Let's map: The vertical A lines at columns 5,10,15. So panes are columns 1-4 (pane1), 6-9 (pane2), 11-14 (pane3), 16-19 (pane4). The R block is at columns 6-9 (pane2). So output should have R at column2, but they have at column3. Hmm maybe they also reflect horizontally (mirror). So after reflection, column order reversed: pane1 <-> pane4, pane2 <-> pane3. So R originally in pane2 becomes pane3 after reflection. Indeed output column3 is R. Good. Now top row third pane (cols11-14) is '.' (since there is A at col10 then '.' area). Output column2 is '.' (makes sense after reflection). Top row fourth pane (cols16-19) is '.'? Actually there is '.' after A at col15? In first rows, after A at col15 there are '.' . So pane4 is '.'; after reflection becomes column1 '.' (output column1 '. ... [6059 chars truncated]
"A tissue sample under the microscope reveals colonies of pigmented cells separated by connective membranes. The pathologist records each colony's dominant stain on a simplified chart, then views the slide through a mirror-image eyepiece that reverses left and right."
120b: k=1
See: Clusters of uniformly colored cells are partitioned by thin membranes of a single structural color. Some compartments are unstained (black). The membranes form a complete lattice.
Do: Log the stain color of each compartment (or mark it blank if unstained) to create a condensed chart. Then flip the chart as though viewing it through a mirror — reverse the column order left to right.
Grid: Each pixel in the output represents one compartment's stain. The structural membrane color vanishes from the record. The chart reads as a mirror image of the original layout.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid contains compartments separated by membranes of a single structural color. The membranes form a complete lattice. We need to log the stain color of each compartment (or blank if unstained) to create a condensed chart. Then flip the chart as though viewing it through a mirror — reverse column order left to right. Essentially we have a grid with "walls" of a particular color (maybe A?) forming compartments. Inside each compartment there may be a uniform color (the stain) or black (unstained). We need to produce a smaller grid where each cell corresponds to a compartment, containing the stain color (or blank if black). Then mirror horizontally. From example 1: Let's analyze. Input example 1 (I'll rewrite). It's 19x? Actually lines show 19 columns? Let's count: ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." That's 19 entries. So grid 19x19? Actually there are 19 rows as well. So 19x19. We see pattern: There are vertical/horizontal lines of A (azure) forming a lattice. The compartments are squares of size 4x4? Let's examine: The first 4 rows have ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . .". So there is a column of A at position 5, then a block of R's columns 6-9, then A at column10, then blanks etc. So A's form grid lines. Similarly rows 5 is all A's (full row). So A's are the membrane color. Thus compartments are the 4x4 blocks bounded by A lines. Inside each compartment there may be a uniform color (R, B, G) or black (.) (unstained). For example top-left compartment (rows1-4, cols1-4) is all '.' (black). So output should have '.' for that compartment. Top middle compartment (rows1-4, cols6-9) is all R. So output should have 'R'. Top right compartment (rows1-4, cols12-15?) Actually there is A at col14? Wait pattern: after second A at col10, there are ". . . . A . . . ." So there is another A at col14? Let's count: columns: 1-4 '.';5 A;6-9 R;10 A;11-14 '.';15 A;16-19 '.'? Actually row shows ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . .". That's 4 '.' then A then 4 R then A then 4 '.' then A then 4 '.' . So compartments: leftmost (col1-4) black; middle (col6-9) red; rightmost (col12-15?) Wait after second A at col10, there are 4 '.' (col11-14) then A at col15, then 4 '.' (col16-19). So there is a compartment of '.' (black) between A lines. So top row compartments: left black, middle red, right black. Now output grid given: ". . R ." ". . B R" ". B . ." "G . . ." That's a 4x4 grid. So there are 4 compartments per row/col? Let's see: The lattice likely creates 4x4 compartments (since there are 5 A lines horizontally and vertically, dividing into 4 cells each direction). Indeed there are 5 A rows (row5,10,15,20? Actually 19 rows, A rows at 5,10,15? plus maybe row? Let's check: row5 is all A; row10 is all A; row15 is all A; row? Actually row? The pattern shows A rows at 5,10,15,? maybe 20 but grid size 19 so last row maybe not A. So there are 4 compartments vertically. Thus output is 4x4. Now we need to map eac ... [7683 chars truncated]
"A telescope's CCD captures a grid of nebula segments separated by diffraction spikes of a single wavelength. Each segment glows in one emission color or is dark void. The image is then flipped by the telescope's mirror optics — left and right are swapped."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Segments of uniform emission color or void (black) separated by diffraction lines of one color forming a lattice.
Do: Reduce each segment to its emission color or void. Apply the mirror correction — reverse columns.
Grid: One pixel per segment. Diffraction-spike color is absent. Horizontally mirrored.
"A harbor master's chart divides the bay into berths using buoy lines of a single signal color. Each berth holds a vessel flying one hull color, or sits empty as open water. The chart is printed for use with a sextant mirror — left and right are reversed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular berths of solid color or empty black water, separated by buoy-line grids of one color.
Do: Log each berth's hull color or empty status. Reverse the chart left to right as the sextant mirror demands.
Grid: One pixel per berth. Buoy-line color gone. Columns mirrored.
"A circuit board is divided into component bays by copper traces of a single alloy color. Each bay houses a component marked by one LED color, or is unpopulated (dark). When the board is flipped for bottom-side soldering, the layout mirrors horizontally."
120b: fail
See: Component bays of uniform LED color or dark (black), separated by continuous copper traces of one color.
Do: Map each bay to its LED color or dark. Flip the board — reverse columns left to right.
Grid: One pixel per bay. Copper trace color absent. Layout is horizontally flipped.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have input grids with many rows and columns, containing colors and '.' (black). Output grids are small (4x4? Example1 output 4x4). So transformation extracts something. Metaphor: component bays of uniform LED color or dark (black), separated by continuous copper traces of one color. Map each bay to its LED color or dark. Flip board — reverse columns left to right. One pixel per bay. Copper trace color absent. Layout is horizontally flipped. Interpretation: Input grid consists of blocks (bays) separated by lines (traces) of a particular color (maybe A? azure). The bays are uniform color (or black). Need to map each bay to its color (or black) and produce a smaller grid where each bay becomes a pixel. Also flip horizontally (reverse columns). So we need to identify the pattern of separators. Look at Example1 input: It's 19x? Let's count rows: appears 19 rows (since pattern repeats). Output is 4x4. So there are 4 bays horizontally and 4 vertically. In input, there are rows of '.' and A etc. Let's examine structure: The grid seems to have repeating pattern: first 4 rows have ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." etc. So there is a vertical separator column of A? Actually pattern: columns: first 4 '.' then A then RRRR then A then ... etc. So A acts as separator (copper trace). The bays are blocks of uniform color: R block, B block, G block, etc. Let's parse: The grid likely consists of 4x4 bays each of size 4x4? Let's see: The first 4 rows correspond to top row of bays? They have pattern: . . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . . (maybe 4 columns of '.' then A then 4 columns of R then A then 4 columns of '.' then A then 4 columns of '.'?). Actually after the second A there are ". . . . A . . . ." etc. So there are three A separators horizontally? Let's count: pattern: 4 '.' then A then 4 R then A then 4 '.' then A then 4 '.'? Not sure. But output first row is ". . R .". That corresponds to top row of bays: leftmost bay black (.), second bay black, third bay red, fourth bay black. So mapping: The top row of bays includes a red bay in third column. Looking at input top rows: The first 4 rows have R block in columns after first A. So that matches third bay being red. The other bays are '.' (black). So indeed. Thus rule: Identify vertical and horizontal separator lines of a specific color (maybe A). The separators are continuous lines across entire grid (full rows/columns). They separate the grid into subgrid blocks (bays). Each bay is uniform (all same color or black). Output is a grid where each cell corresponds to a bay, colored with the bay's color (or '.' if black). Then flip horizontally (reverse column order). Also maybe flip vertically? The description says flip board — reverse columns left to right (horizontal flip). Not rows. Check Example1: After extracting, we need to flip horizontally. Let's test: Without flip, the top row of bays would be: first bay '.' second '.' thi ... [8501 chars truncated]
"A divine mosaic depicts realms of the gods separated by rivers of a single sacred hue. Each realm glows with its deity's color or lies in primordial darkness. Mortals can only see the mosaic reflected in a holy pool — the image appears reversed, as in a mirror."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Realms of solid divine color or darkness partitioned by sacred rivers of one color forming a lattice.
Do: Distill each realm to its deity's color or darkness. View through the reflecting pool — mirror left to right.
Grid: One pixel per realm. River color vanishes. Columns reversed as in a reflection.
"A ballroom floor is divided into colored tiles by silver ribbons of a single hue. Each tile is dyed a dancer's assigned color or left bare (black). The choreographer watches from a mirror wall — she sees every dancer's position laterally reversed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Tiles of uniform color or bare black, separated by ribbons of one color forming a complete grid.
Do: Note each tile's color or bare status. Record positions as the mirror shows them — reversed left to right.
Grid: One pixel per tile. Ribbon color absent. Mirrored horizontally.
"A cross-section of sedimentary rock reveals mineral deposits in colored pockets separated by veins of a single intrusive mineral. Each pocket is either rich with one ore color or barren (dark). The geologist's core sample was extracted and split — exposing the mirror face, so left and right are swapped."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Mineral pockets of uniform color or barren dark rock, separated by intrusive veins of one mineral color forming a grid.
Do: Catalog each pocket's ore color or barren status. Read from the split mirror face — reverse columns.
Grid: One pixel per pocket. Vein mineral color absent. Layout is horizontally mirrored.
"A waffle iron stamps deep wells into batter, separated by crisp ridges. The chef notes which wells hold colored jams and which are empty, then flips the waffle onto a plate — reversing left and right as the underside faces up."
120b: k=1
See: A grid of square wells divided by uniform ridges of one color. Each well is either filled with a single flavor-color or left empty (black).
Do: Record each well's filling on a small card. Then flip the card face-down onto the plate so left becomes right — mirror the columns.
Grid: One pixel per well. Ridge color disappears. The layout is horizontally reversed from the original arrangement.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid seems larger with pattern of wells separated by ridges of color A? Let's examine example 1. Input appears 19x? Actually lines: many rows. The pattern: there are blocks of 4 rows of something, then a row of A's, then 4 rows of something, etc. The description: grid of wells divided by uniform ridges of one color. Each well is either filled with a single flavor-color or left empty (black). So the input includes ridges (color A maybe) that separate wells. The output is a small grid representing each well's filling (color) or empty. Thus we need to identify wells: contiguous region bounded by ridge color A? In example, ridge color appears as A (azure). The wells are 4x4 blocks? Let's see: Input first 4 rows have pattern: ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." etc. So there is a vertical ridge column of A separating sections. Also horizontal ridge rows of A? Indeed row 5 is all A's. So the grid is partitioned into 4x4 wells separated by single column/row of A. Thus each well is 4x4 cells. Within each well, either all cells are same color (filled) or all black (.)? Let's check first well (top-left) rows 1-4 cols 1-4 are all '.' (black). So empty. Output first cell is '.'? Output grid first row first column is '.'? Output given: ". . R ." first row: . . R . So first cell '.' matches empty. Second well (top row, second column) rows1-4 cols6-9? Actually after first ridge column at col5 is A, then columns 6-9 are R's. So that well is filled with R. Output first row second column is '.'? Wait output first row: ". . R ." positions: col1 ., col2 ., col3 R, col4 . So second well corresponds to output col2 which is '.' but we expected R. Let's map correctly. Let's index wells: The pattern: columns: 1-4 well1, col5 ridge A, col6-9 well2, col10 ridge A, col11-14 well3, col15 ridge A, col16-19 well4? Actually total columns maybe 19. Output grid is 4x4 (since 4 wells per row). Output first row: . . R . So third well is R. Indeed well3 (cols11-14) maybe R? Let's check input: after second ridge at col10, columns 11-14 are '.'? Wait row1: ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." So after second ridge A at col10, we have ". . . ." (cols11-14) which are '.' not R. Hmm. Let's recount: Row1 tokens: . . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . . That's 19 tokens. Let's index: 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 A (ridge) 6 R 7 R 8 R 9 R 10 A (ridge) 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 A (ridge) 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . Thus wells: columns 1-4 (well1) = all . ; columns 6-9 (well2) = R ; columns 11-14 (well3) = . ; columns 16-19 (well4) = . . . . (empty). Output first row: . . R . So mapping: well1 -> ., well2 -> ., well3 -> R, well4 -> . . That's not matching. Maybe the output grid is rotated or mirrored? Description: flip the card face-down onto the plate so left becomes right — mirror the columns. So output is mirrored horizontally relative to original arrangement. So we need to mirror columns of wells. Thus original well order left to right: ... [6415 chars truncated]
"A composer's manuscript shows measures separated by heavy bar lines of a single ink. Each measure is either filled with a colored whole note or left as silence. The score is then read in retrograde — played from the last measure of each line to the first."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular blocks of uniform color sit in a lattice defined by bar-line separators. Empty blocks are rests (black).
Do: Reduce each measure to its note-color or rest. Read each line of the score backwards — reverse the order of measures within each row.
Grid: A miniature score where each cell is one measure. Bar-line ink is absent. Each row is reversed left to right.
"A stadium scoreboard is divided into team-colored panels by bright metal framing. The announcer reads off each panel's color for the broadcast graphic, but the camera is shooting from behind the board — so the image comes out mirror-flipped."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular panels of solid color (or unlit/black) separated by a single-colored metal frame that forms a complete grid.
Do: Record each panel as a single colored or blank dot. Then present the image as the camera sees it from behind — horizontally mirrored.
Grid: One pixel per panel. Frame color absent. Columns are reversed as if viewed from behind.
"A meteorologist's satellite mosaic shows storm cells in colored zones separated by thin jet-stream bands. She transcribes each zone's dominant color onto a simplified weather map, but the satellite feed is mirror-reversed because the dish is calibrated for the southern hemisphere."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Colored weather zones separated by continuous bands of a single atmospheric color forming a grid. Some zones are clear (black).
Do: Summarize each zone as a single color or clear. Correct for the mirror reversal by flipping the map horizontally.
Grid: One pixel per zone. Jet-stream bands disappear. The map is left-right reversed.
"A façade of colored glass panes is held together by lead caming in a single metallic hue. An architect sketches a thumbnail of each pane's color, but she's drawing while facing the building — so her sketch is the mirror image of what someone inside would see."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A wall of uniformly colored or empty glass panes divided by thin lead strips of one color forming a lattice.
Do: Reduce each pane to a single color dot (or black if empty). Mirror the sketch horizontally as though viewing from the opposite side.
Grid: One pixel per pane. Lead color is omitted. Columns are reversed left to right.
"A battlefield map is divided into sectors by fortified trenches of a single color. Intelligence marks each sector as occupied (by a colored regiment) or empty. But the intercepted map was drawn from the enemy's perspective — everything is laterally inverted."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Sectors of uniform color or emptiness separated by trench lines of one color that span the full map.
Do: Reduce each sector to its regiment color or empty. Flip the map horizontally to correct for the enemy's reversed perspective.
Grid: One pixel per sector. Trench color absent. Layout is mirrored left to right.
"A stage is divided into spotlight zones by beams of a single colored gel. Each zone bathes an actor in a costume of one hue, or stands empty in darkness. The audience sees the scene, but from their seats everything is reversed — stage left is their right."
120b: k=1
See: Zones of solid color or darkness separated by light-beams of a uniform gel color forming a complete grid.
Do: Note each zone's costume color or darkness. Present the scene as the audience perceives it — mirrored left to right.
Grid: One pixel per zone. Gel-beam color vanishes. Columns are reversed to match audience perspective.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is large grid with zones separated by "gel" color? In description: zones of solid color or darkness separated by light-beams of a uniform gel color forming a complete grid. Gel-beam color vanishes. Columns are reversed (mirrored left to right). Output is one pixel per zone. So we need to identify zones (areas) separated by a uniform color that forms a grid (like lines). The gel-beam color is maybe 'A' azure? In example, input shows many A's forming vertical and horizontal lines dividing the grid into zones. Indeed in example 1 input, there are rows of A's forming grid lines. The zones are blocks of other colors (R, B, G, .). The output is a 4x4 grid (since there are 4 zones per row/col?). Output shows . . R . etc. Let's analyze example 1: Input size? Looks like 19x19? Actually there are 19 rows each with 19 entries? Let's count: first row: ". . . . A R R R R A . . . . A . . . ." That's 19 entries. So grid 19x19. The A's form a grid: there are vertical lines of A at columns 5,10,15? Let's index columns 1-19. At col5 is A, col10 A, col15 A. Also horizontal lines of A rows at rows 5,10,15? Indeed row5 is all A's. Row10 all A's. Row15 all A's. So grid of 4x4 zones (since 3 lines divide into 4 sections). Zones are 4x4 blocks? Actually each zone size is 4 rows x4 columns (since between lines). So there are 4 zones per row/col, total 16 zones. Output is 4x4 grid, each cell representing a zone's "costume color or darkness". The rule: For each zone, note the dominant color? In example output: . . R . etc. Let's map zones. Let's label zones: rows 1-4,6-9,11-14,16-19 (since lines at rows5,10,15). Columns similarly 1-4,6-9,11-14,16-19. Now zone (top-left) rows1-4 cols1-4: all '.' (black). Output top-left is '.' (matches). Zone (top second) rows1-4 cols6-9: contains R's? Actually rows1-4 col6-9 are R R R R (since after A at col5, there are R's). So zone is all R. Output at (row1,col2) is '.'? Wait output first row: ". . R ." So positions: col1 '.' col2 '.' col3 'R' col4 '.'. So top row third zone is R. That corresponds to zone rows1-4 cols11-14? Let's check: columns 11-14 are '.'? Actually after second A at col10, there are '.'? Row1 col11-14 are . . . . So that's black. But output shows R at third column. Hmm maybe mapping is mirrored left to right (columns reversed). So after mirroring, zone order reversed: original leftmost zone becomes rightmost in output. Let's test: Original zones left to right: zone1 (col1-4) black, zone2 (col6-9) red, zone3 (col11-14) black, zone4 (col16-19) black? Actually col16-19 after third A at col15 are . . . . So black. After mirroring, order becomes zone4, zone3, zone2, zone1. So output row1 would be: zone4 black -> '.' ; zone3 black -> '.' ; zone2 red -> 'R'; zone1 black -> '.' matches ". . R .". Good. Now second output row: ". . B R". This corresponds to second row of zones (rows6-9). Let's examine zone rows6-9 cols1-4: rows6-9 col1-4 are R R R R (since row6 starts w ... [6507 chars truncated]
"A formal garden is divided into planting beds by gravel paths of a single stone color. Each bed blooms in one color or lies fallow (bare earth). A gardener photographs the layout from a second-floor window using a mirror periscope, flipping the image horizontally."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Rectangular beds of uniform flower-color or bare black soil, separated by continuous gravel paths of one color.
Do: Record each bed's bloom color or bare status. Flip the plan horizontally as the mirror periscope does.
Grid: One pixel per bed. Path color absent. Layout is left-right reversed.
See: The input grid contains cells of two types: azure (A) cells and black (.) cells. The azure cells form an irregular pattern scattered across the grid, while black cells serve as the background.
Do: For each cell in the grid: (1) If the cell is black (.), leave it unchanged. (2) If the cell is azure (A) at position (row, col), find its vertical mirror position at (H-1-row, col), where H is the grid height. Check what occupies that mirror position in the input grid. If the mirror position also contains azure (A), replace the current cell with red (R). If the mirror position contains black (.), replace the current cell with grey (X).
Grid: The grid is 6 rows by 6 columns. Black (.) is the background color and remains unchanged throughout the transformation. The coordinate system has row 0 at the top. The vertical reflection axis is the horizontal midline of the grid, pairing row r with row H-1-r.
"A still lake reflects the sky, but where the reflection meets solid ground, it turns to stone."
120b: k=3
See: A landscape of azure figures stands on a dark stage. Some areas are empty darkness, others are occupied by azure presences — scattered unevenly, as if a crowd milling about before a performance.
Do: A great lake lies along the horizon, perfectly still. Each azure figure gazes down into the water to find its reflection on the opposite shore. If the figure sees a twin gazing back — another azure soul standing at the mirrored spot — both blush red with recognition. But if the figure peers into the water and finds only empty darkness where a twin should be, it turns grey with loneliness, hardening to stone. The dark empty spaces, having no one to cast a reflection, remain untouched.
Grid: The stage is six steps wide and six steps tall. The lake's surface runs horizontally through the middle, so each figure on the upper shore has a counterpart position on the lower shore, and vice versa. The darkness is merely empty ground — it plays no part in the reflection and stays as it is.
We need to infer rule. From description: azure figures = A. Dark empty = . (black). Lake is horizontal middle line: each figure on upper shore has counterpart position on lower shore (mirrored vertically across middle). If both have A at mirrored positions, they both become red (R). If only one side has A and opposite side is ., then that A becomes grey (X). The dark empty spaces remain unchanged (stay .). Also note that after transformation, the lower side also changes accordingly: if upper A has counterpart A, both become R. If upper A has no counterpart, it becomes X, and lower side . stays .? Wait description: "If the figure sees a twin gazing back — another azure soul standing at the mirrored spot — both blush red with recognition. But if the figure peers into the water and finds only empty darkness where a twin should be, it turns grey with loneliness, hardening to stone. The dark empty spaces, having no one to cast a reflection, remain untouched." So for a solitary A, it becomes X. The counterpart is . (dark) stays . (unchanged). For a pair of As, both become R. Thus rule: For each cell (i,j) where i is row index (0-5). Mirror row = 5 - i (since 6 rows). For each pair (i,j) and (mirror_i,j). If both are A -> both become R. Else if one is A and other is . -> the A becomes X, . stays . . If both . -> stay . . Also note there may be As on both sides but after processing one side, the other also processed; but we must ensure not double change. So final output: For each column j, look at the two rows (top and bottom). Determine. Let's test with Example1 to verify. Example1 Input grid 6x6: Row0: . A . A A A Row1: A A A A A . Row2: A . A . A . Row3: . A A A . A Row4: A A . A A . Row5: A A . . . A Mirror pairs: row0 with row5, row1 with row4, row2 with row3. Compute column-wise. I'll compute row0 vs row5: col0: row0 '.' , row5 'A' => solitary A at row5 becomes X? Output row5 col0 is X (check output row5: X R . . . R) yes col0 X. row0 stays '.' (output row0 col0 '.'), matches. col1: row0 'A', row5 'A' => both become R. Output row0 col1 R, row5 col1 R. Yes. col2: row0 '.' , row5 '.' => both '.' output row0 col2 '.' row5 col2 '.'? Output row5 col2 '.' yes. col3: row0 'A', row5 '.' => solitary A at row0 becomes X, row5 stays '.' . Output row0 col3 X, row5 col3 '.'? Output row5 col3 '.' yes. col4: row0 'A', row5 '.' => solitary A at row0 X, row5 '.' . Output row0 col4 X, row5 col4 '.' yes. col5: row0 'A', row5 'A' => both R. Output row0 col5 R, row5 col5 R. Yes. Now row1 vs row4: Row1: A A A A A . Row4: A A . A A . col0: A & A => both R. Output row1 col0 R, row4 col0 R. Yes. col1: A & A => both R. Output row1 col1 R, row4 col1 R. Yes. col2: A & . => solitary A at row1 becomes X, row4 stays . . Output row1 col2 X, row4 col2 '.'? Output row4 col2 '.' yes. col3: A & A => both R. Output row1 col3 R, row4 col3 R. Yes. col4: A & A => both R. Output row1 col4 R, row4 ... [3158 chars truncated]
"Cells in a petri dish carry genetic markers. When a cell finds its twin across the body's axis of symmetry, their shared lineage blazes red. But a cell whose twin was never born bears the grey pallor of a recessive gene unexpressed."
120b: k=1
See: A culture of living cells (azure) scattered across an organism's body plan, with empty gaps (black) where no cells grew.
Do: Each living cell looks for its mirror-twin across the body's horizontal midline. Shared ancestry turns both cells red; an orphan cell with no twin turns grey. Empty space remains empty.
Grid: A 6x6 body plan. Black is void. The axis of symmetry runs horizontally through the middle.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 6x6. Azure cells (A) are living cells. Black '.' empty. Need to find mirror twin across horizontal midline (i.e., vertical axis? Wait "horizontal midline" means axis runs horizontally through middle, i.e., a line left-right across middle rows, so mirror across that line means reflect vertically (top-bottom). So each cell looks for its counterpart in the row symmetric about the middle horizontal line. For a 6x6 grid, rows 0-5. Horizontal midline between rows 2 and 3? Since even number, the axis is between rows 2 and 3. Mirror of row i is row 5 - i. So top rows reflect to bottom rows. If a cell has a twin (i.e., there is also an A at the mirrored position), then both become red (R). If no twin, becomes grey (X). Empty stays empty (.). Output example: Let's test. Example 1 Input grid (6x6). Let's label rows 0-5. Row0: . A . A A A Row1: A A A A A . Row2: A . A . A . Row3: . A A A . A Row4: A A . A A . Row5: A A . . . A Now compute mirror pairs: row0 with row5, row1 with row4, row2 with row3. Check each column. Row0 col0 '.' vs row5 col0 'A' -> '.' stays '.'? Output row0 col0 '.' matches. Good. Row0 col1 'A' vs row5 col1 'A' => both have A, so both become R. Output row0 col1 R, row5 col1 R. Indeed output row5 col1 R. Row0 col2 '.' vs row5 col2 '.' => both '.' remain '.'? Output row0 col2 '.' matches. Row5 col2 '.' output row5 col2 '.'? Output row5 col2 '.' yes. Row0 col3 'A' vs row5 col3 '.' => only top has A, bottom empty. So top becomes X (grey) and bottom remains '.'? Wait rule says orphan cell becomes grey. So top becomes X. Output row0 col3 X. Yes. Bottom row5 col3 '.' stays '.'? Output row5 col3 '.' yes. Row0 col4 'A' vs row5 col4 '.' => top becomes X, bottom '.' stays '.'; output row0 col4 X, row5 col4 '.' yes. Row0 col5 'A' vs row5 col5 'A' => both become R. Output row0 col5 R, row5 col5 R. Yes. Now row1 vs row4. Row1 col0 'A' vs row4 col0 'A' => both R. Output row1 col0 R, row4 col0 R. Yes. Row1 col1 'A' vs row4 col1 'A' => both R. Output row1 col1 R, row4 col1 R. Yes. Row1 col2 'A' vs row4 col2 '.' => top becomes X, bottom '.' stays '.'; output row1 col2 X, row4 col2 '.'? Output row4 col2 '.' yes. Row1 col3 'A' vs row4 col3 'A' => both R. Output row1 col3 R, row4 col3 R. Yes. Row1 col4 'A' vs row4 col4 'A' => both R. Output row1 col4 R, row4 col4 R. Yes. Row1 col5 '.' vs row4 col5 '.' => both '.' remain '.'; output row1 col5 '.'? Actually output row1 col5 '.'? In output row1 col5 '.'? Let's see output row1: "R R X R R ." matches. Yes. Row2 vs row3. Row2 col0 'A' vs row3 col0 '.' => top becomes X, bottom '.' stays '.'; output row2 col0 X, row3 col0 '.'? Output row2 col0 X, row3 col0 '.'? Output row3 col0 '.'? Actually output row3 line: ". X R X . X". Row3 col0 '.' matches. Row2 col1 '.' vs row3 col1 'A' => bottom becomes X? Wait orphan cell is the one that has A without twin. So row3 col1 A becomes X, row2 col1 '.' stays '.'; output row2 col1 '.'? ... [3226 chars truncated]
"Stars in a galaxy are caught in a gravitational fold along the galactic plane. When a star's antimatter twin exists on the other side, annihilation paints them both red. A star with no twin across the plane cools to grey dwarf status, burning alone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Stars (azure) scattered across a galaxy, with dark void (black) between them.
Do: Each star checks for a twin across the galactic midplane. Paired stars annihilate red. Lone stars cool grey. Void remains void.
Grid: A 6x6 galaxy. The galactic plane is the horizontal center.
"A captain reads a nautical chart split by the equator. Ports that have a sister port at the same longitude in the opposite hemisphere fly red ensigns — they are trade partners. Ports with no southern twin fly grey flags, isolated from commerce."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Ports (azure) dotted across a sea chart, with open water (black) filling the gaps.
Do: Each port looks for a counterpart mirrored across the chart's horizontal equator. Paired ports turn red. Unpaired ports turn grey. Open water stays open.
Grid: A 6x6 nautical chart. The equator is the horizontal midline.
"A circuit board is folded along its center trace. Wherever solder pads align across the fold, current flows and they glow red-hot. Pads that meet only bare board lose their charge and go grey. The bare substrate stays inert."
120b: k=1
See: Solder pads (azure) on a circuit board, with bare substrate (black) between them.
Do: Fold the board along the horizontal center trace. Aligned pads conduct and glow red. Misaligned pads discharge to grey. Bare board stays bare.
Grid: A 6x6 circuit board. The fold axis is the horizontal midline.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6 with colors: '.' black, 'A' azure, maybe other colors? Only '.' and 'A' present in input. Output contains '.' black, 'R' red, 'X' grey. So transformation: folding horizontally (midline). For each column, compare top half and bottom half cells. If both are 'A' (pads) aligned after folding, they become 'R' (red). If one is 'A' and the other is '.' (misaligned), result becomes 'X' (grey). If both '.' remain '.'? Let's check example. Let's label rows 0-5. Midline horizontal center trace: between rows 2 and 3? Since 6 rows, fold along horizontal center line (midline) meaning row 0 folds onto row5, row1 onto row4, row2 onto row3. So we pair rows (0,5), (1,4), (2,3). For each column, we need to combine. Let's compute for example 1. Input rows: 0: . A . A A A 1: A A A A A . 2: A . A . A . 3: . A A A . A 4: A A . A A . 5: A A . . . A Now pair: Pair (0,5): row0 vs row5: col0: '.' vs 'A' => misaligned => X? Output row? Which row does output correspond to? Output grid also 6x6. Probably after folding, we keep top half? Or maybe we produce combined result for each pair placed in top half? Let's see output rows. Output rows: 0: . R . X X R 1: R R X R R . 2: X . R . X . 3: . X R X . X 4: R R . R R . 5: X R . . . R Interesting output seems symmetric? Let's compute expected for each pair and see where they appear. Compute pair (0,5) results per column: c0: '.' vs 'A' => X c1: 'A' vs 'A' => R c2: '.' vs '.' => ? both '.' maybe '.'? In output row0 col2 is '.' matches. c3: 'A' vs '.' => X c4: 'A' vs '.' => X c5: 'A' vs 'A' => R So result row maybe row0? Output row0 is ". R . X X R" matches exactly! Good. So output row0 corresponds to pair (0,5) result. Now pair (1,4): row1: A A A A A . row4: A A . A A . Compute: c0: A vs A => R c1: A vs A => R c2: A vs . => X c3: A vs A => R c4: A vs A => R c5: . vs . => . (both .) Output row1 is "R R X R R ." matches! Good. Pair (2,3): row2: A . A . A . row3: . A A A . A Compute: c0: A vs . => X c1: . vs A => X? Wait both misaligned but one A one . => X c2: A vs A => R c3: . vs A => X c4: A vs . => X c5: . vs A => X? Actually . vs A => X But output row2 is "X . R . X ." Wait not matching. Let's compute again maybe rule different for positions where both '.' produce '.' else? Let's recompute carefully. Row2 col0: A (top) vs . (bottom) => X (output row2 col0 is X) matches. col1: . vs A => X but output row2 col1 is '.' not X. Hmm discrepancy. col2: A vs A => R matches. col3: . vs A => X but output row2 col3 is '.'. col4: A vs . => X output row2 col4 is X matches. col5: . vs A => X output row2 col5 is '.'. So output row2 has '.' in columns where top is '.' and bottom is A? Actually col1 top '.' bottom A gave '.' not X. col3 top '.' bottom A gave '.' not X. col5 top '.' bottom A gave '.' not X. So rule maybe: if top is '.' and bottom is A, result is '.' (keep top). If top is A and bottom '.' ... [5800 chars truncated]
"The gods placed mortal souls on a great tapestry, then folded it along the thread of fate. Where two souls touch through the fold, destiny binds them in red thread. A soul that touches only void is marked grey — fated to walk alone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Souls (azure) woven into a cosmic tapestry, with empty weave (black) between them.
Do: The tapestry folds along its horizontal center thread. Souls matched across the fold turn red. Unmatched souls turn grey. Empty weave stays empty.
Grid: A 6x6 tapestry. The thread of fate runs along the horizontal middle.
"Dancers line the ballroom floor. The dance master calls a grand révérence — each dancer bows toward the center of the hall, seeking a partner on the far side. Those who lock eyes with a partner flush red with the thrill of the dance. Those who bow toward an empty space turn grey with wallflower's shame."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dancers (azure) placed across a ballroom, with empty floor (black) between them.
Do: Each dancer looks for a mirror partner across the ballroom's horizontal center. Matched dancers turn red. Unmatched dancers turn grey. Empty floor stays empty.
Grid: A 6x6 ballroom. The center line divides the two halves of the floor.
"Tectonic plates press together along a fault line running through the earth's middle. Where mineral deposits on one plate meet deposits on the other, the pressure forges red garnet. Where deposits meet only hollow cavern, theyite to greyiteiteite."
120b: k=1
See: Mineral deposits (azure) embedded in rock strata, with hollow caverns (black) between them.
Do: The strata fold along the horizontal fault line. Deposits pressed against deposits crystallize red. Deposits pressed against cavernsite grey. Caverns remain hollow.
Grid: A 6x6 cross-section of earth. The fault line is the horizontal midline.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 6x6, output same size. Colors: . black, A azure, others appear in output: R red, X grey. So transformation: fold along horizontal midline (fault line). Horizontal midline is between rows 3 and 4? Since 6 rows, midline is between rows 3 and 4 (i.e., after row 3). "Strata fold along the horizontal fault line. Deposits pressed against deposits crystallize red. Deposits pressed against cavernsite grey. Caverns remain hollow." Interpretation: We have two halves: top 3 rows and bottom 3 rows. They fold onto each other (maybe mirror). When they overlay, cells where both have A (deposit) become R. Where one has A and other has . (cavern) become X (grey). Where both are . remain .? Caverns remain hollow (black). Also maybe other colors unchanged? In example, only A and . present in input. Output contains R and X and . . Let's test. Take input example 1. Let's write rows: Row1: . A . A A A Row2: A A A A A . Row3: A . A . A . Row4: . A A A . A Row5: A A . A A . Row6: A A . . . A Now fold: top rows 1-3 fold onto bottom rows 6-4? Probably row1 aligns with row6, row2 with row5, row3 with row4 (mirror vertically). Let's compute overlay: For each column, combine top cell and bottom cell. Define pair (top, bottom) where top = row i, bottom = row 7-i. Pairs: i=1: top row1, bottom row6. i=2: top row2, bottom row5. i=3: top row3, bottom row4. Now for each column j, we have two cells. Now rule: If both are A => R. If one A and other . => X. If both . => . (remain black). Let's test against output. Compute for each position. I'll create grid of output rows 1-6? Output given: Row1: . R . X X R Row2: R R X R R . Row3: X . R . X . Row4: . X R X . X Row5: R R . R R . Row6: X R . . . R Interesting output seems symmetric: rows 1-3 correspond to rows 6-4 maybe? Let's compute overlay results and see if they match. We'll compute overlay result for each pair and assign to both rows? Perhaps after folding, the result appears in both halves (mirrored). Let's compute overlay for each pair and assign to both rows (top and bottom) maybe. Pair 1 (row1 & row6): Row1: . A . A A A Row6: A A . . . A Now per column: col1: top '.' bottom 'A' => one A one . => X col2: top 'A' bottom 'A' => both A => R col3: top '.' bottom '.' => both . => . col4: top 'A' bottom '.' => X col5: top 'A' bottom '.' => X col6: top 'A' bottom 'A' => R So overlay result row = [X,R,.,X,X,R]. In output, row1 is . R . X X R (different first element). Row6 is X R . . . R (different). Hmm. Our computed first element X but output row1 col1 is '.' not X. Row6 col1 is X matches our X. So maybe after folding, the top half becomes result of overlay but with some rule about which side is "pressed against"? Maybe the top half is considered moving down onto bottom, so the bottom cells stay as they were unless overlapped? Or maybe the result is placed in the bottom half only, and top half remains original? Let's examine. Output ro ... [5445 chars truncated]
"A chef folds a crêpe in half along its center. Where batter meets batter in the fold, the layers caramelize to a warm red. Where batter meets only air, it dries to a dusty grey."
120b: k=1
See: Drops of batter (azure) spread unevenly on a flat griddle, with bare spots (black) where the pan shows through.
Do: Imagine folding the griddle top-to-bottom along its horizontal center. Where batter overlaps batter, it caramelizes red. Where batter folds onto a bare spot, it cools grey. Bare spots stay bare.
Grid: A 6x6 griddle surface. The fold line is the horizontal midline.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 6x6 with colors '.' black and 'A' azure. Output uses '.' black, 'R' red, 'X' grey. So transformation: fold horizontally (top to bottom) along middle line (between rows 3 and 4? Since 6 rows, horizontal center is between rows 3 and 4). So we fold top half onto bottom half (or vice versa). Overlap rules: where batter (A) overlaps batter => red (R). Where batter folds onto bare spot (.) => grey (X). Bare spots stay bare (.)? In output example, check. Let's map example 1. Input grid (6x6). Let's index rows 1-6. Input rows: 1: . A . A A A 2: A A A A A . 3: A . A . A . 4: . A A A . A 5: A A . A A . 6: A A . . . A Now fold top to bottom along horizontal center: rows 1-3 fold onto rows 6-4 respectively (mirror). So row1 maps onto row6, row2 onto row5, row3 onto row4. For each column, we consider pair of cells: top cell (from upper half) and bottom cell (from lower half). The folding presumably flips vertically, so row1 aligns with row6, row2 with row5, row3 with row4. The output grid is also 6x6? Yes same size. The result for each position is determined by overlapping of the two cells after folding. But also original bottom half maybe also considered? The description: "Where batter overlaps batter, it caramelizes red. Where batter folds onto a bare spot, it cools grey. Bare spots stay bare." So after folding, we have overlapping of two layers: top layer (folded) onto bottom layer. The resulting cell color depends on combination: if both are A => R. If top is A and bottom is . => X. If top is . and bottom is A? That would be bottom batter not overlapped? But description says batter folds onto bare spot => grey. If top is . and bottom is A, then no batter folding onto that spot (since top is bare). So maybe remains A? But output never shows A; only . R X. So maybe after folding, we only consider top half's content overlaying bottom half, and then we replace bottom cell with result, discarding original bottom? Let's test with example. Compute for each column. I'll create pairs (top, bottom) after folding. Row1 (top) vs Row6 (bottom): Row1: . A . A A A Row6: A A . . . A Pair per column: c1: top '.' bottom 'A' => top is bare, bottom batter. According to rule, top is . so no batter folding onto bottom. What output at row6 col1? In output row6: X R . . . R (from example). Row6 col1 is X. That's grey, not A. So something else. Maybe after folding, we consider both cells overlapping regardless of which is top. If either is A, result depends: if both A => R, else if exactly one A => X? But then case where both . => . . Let's test. For row6 col1: top '.' bottom 'A' => exactly one A => X. Output X matches. Row6 col2: top 'A' bottom 'A' => both A => R. Output row6 col2 is R. Yes. Row6 col3: top '.' bottom '.' => both . => .? Output row6 col3 is '.' . Yes. Row6 col4: top 'A' bottom '.' => one A => X. Output row6 col4 is '.'? Wait output row6 col4 is '.' according to given: ... [6872 chars truncated]
"Notes on a staff seek their harmonic counterpart in the octave below. When two notes resonate together, they ring out in a warm major chord. A note that finds only silence across the octave hums a hollow, muted tone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Notes (azure) placed at various positions on a musical staff, with rests (black) filling the silence between them.
Do: Each note searches for its reflection across the staff's center line. Two notes in harmonic alignment become red. A note facing silence becomes grey. Rests remain rests.
Grid: A 6x6 staff grid. The center line divides upper and lower registers.
"Two teams line up on opposite sides of the field for a scrimmage. Where an attacker faces a defender, the clash ignites red. Where an attacker charges into empty space, they stumble into grey irrelevance."
120b: k=1
See: Players (azure) positioned across a field, with open ground (black) between them.
Do: The field folds along the halfway line. A player matched against an opponent turns red with competition. A player facing nobody turns grey. Open ground stays open.
Grid: A 6x6 pitch. The halfway line is the horizontal midline.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 6x6. Colors: '.' black, 'A' azure (players). Output uses R red, X grey, others maybe unchanged? In output, '.' become '.'? Let's compare. Input Example1 grid (I'll index rows 1-6, cols 1-6): Row1: . A . A A A Row2: A A A A A . Row3: A . A . A . Row4: . A A A . A Row5: A A . A A . Row6: A A . . . A Output: Row1: . R . X X R Row2: R R X R R . Row3: X . R . X . Row4: . X R X . X Row5: R R . R R . Row6: X R . . . R Observations: '.' in input sometimes become '.' in output (e.g., row1 col1 stays '.'; row2 col6 stays '.'; row3 col2 stays '.'; row4 col1 stays '.'; row5 col3 stays '.'; row6 col4-6? row6 col4 '.' stays '.'; col5 '.' stays '.'; col6 A becomes R). So '.' may stay '.' unless something else? Actually some '.' become X (grey). Example: row1 col4 input A becomes X? Wait row1 col4 input A, output X. Row1 col5 input A -> X. Row2 col3 input A -> X. Row3 col1 input A -> X. Row3 col5 input A -> X. Row4 col2 input A -> X. Row4 col4 input A -> X. Row4 col6 input A -> X. Row6 col1 input A -> X. So many A become X or R. Rule described metaphorically: "Players (azure) positioned across a field, with open ground (black) between them. The field folds along the halfway line. A player matched against an opponent turns red with competition. A player facing nobody turns grey. Open ground stays open." Interpretation: We have a 6x6 grid, halfway line is horizontal midline (between rows 3 and 4? Since 6 rows, halfway line is after row3). Folding along that line means we overlay top half onto bottom half (mirror vertically). So each position in top half (rows 1-3) is matched with corresponding position in bottom half (rows 6-4) (mirrored). For each pair of cells, if both have a player (A), then they are "matched against an opponent" -> turn red (R). If only one side has a player (i.e., player facing nobody), then that player turns grey (X). Open ground (.) stays open (.) regardless. Now need to verify with example. Let's compute pairs: Rows mapping: row1 ↔ row6, row2 ↔ row5, row3 ↔ row4 (since folding along line between 3 and 4). For each column. Take column1: Row1 col1 '.' ; Row6 col1 'A' => only bottom has player, so that player should turn grey X. Output row6 col1 is X (yes). Row1 col1 stays '.' (since no player). Good. Column2: Row1 col2 A ; Row6 col2 A => both have players => both turn red? Output row1 col2 R, row6 col2 R. Yes. Column3: Row1 col3 '.' ; Row6 col3 '.' => none players => both stay '.' (output row1 col3 '.' row6 col3 '.'? Actually output row6 col3 '.' yes). Good. Column4: Row1 col4 A ; Row6 col4 '.' => only top player => turn grey X. Output row1 col4 X, row6 col4 '.' (since no player). Yes. Column5: Row1 col5 A ; Row6 col5 '.' => only top player => X. Output row1 col5 X, row6 col5 '.' yes. Column6: Row1 col6 A ; Row6 col6 A => both players => both R. Output row1 col6 R, row6 col6 R. Yes. Now row2 ↔ row5 ... [4211 chars truncated]
"Storm clouds gather and the sky mirrors itself in a frozen lake below. Where cloud meets cloud-reflection, lightning flashes red. Where cloud meets only dark water, frost creeps grey across the surface."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Clouds (azure) drifting across a sky, with clear patches (black) in between.
Do: The sky reflects vertically in the lake below. Where a cloud aligns with its own reflection, it sparks red. Where a cloud has no reflection, it frosts grey. Clear sky stays clear.
Grid: A 6x6 sky-and-lake grid. The reflection axis is the horizontal center.
"A building's blueprint is folded along the floor that divides upper and lower stories. Where load-bearing walls align perfectly across the fold, they are stamped red for structural integrity. Walls that meet only open air are marked grey — cantilevered and unsupported."
120b: k=1
See: Walls (azure) in an architectural plan, with open space (black) for rooms and corridors.
Do: Fold the blueprint along its horizontal middle floor. Aligned walls turn red. Unmatched walls turn grey. Open space remains open.
Grid: A 6x6 blueprint. The fold is the horizontal midline between floors.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 6x6 with colors '.' black and 'A' azure (walls). Output grid same size with '.' black, 'R' red, 'X' grey. The description: fold along horizontal middle floor (midline between rows 3 and 4). Align walls turn red, unmatched walls turn grey. Open space remains open. So we take top half rows 1-3 and bottom half rows 4-6, flip one half vertically to align? Fold along horizontal middle: imagine folding bottom half up onto top half (or top down). Align cells: for each column, compare cell from top row i with cell from bottom row (mirrored). Since fold line is between rows 3 and 4, row 4 maps to row3, row5 to row2, row6 to row1. So we pair rows: (1,6), (2,5), (3,4). For each column, we have two cells. If both are walls (A), they align => become red (R). If one is wall and other is open (.) then unmatched wall becomes grey (X). If both open, remain open (.)? The description says open space remains open. Also maybe if both walls but one is unmatched? Actually both walls align => red. If both walls but not aligned? Not possible. What about case where both are walls but after folding they overlap? That's red. If both are walls but they are not overlapping because one is missing? That's grey. Now need to produce output grid of same size? How to assign colors to each cell? Probably after folding, the overlapped region (top half) gets result? But output grid same size as input, with each cell representing result of that position after folding? In example, we can test. Let's compute example 1 to verify. Input example 1 (6x6): Row1: . A . A A A Row2: A A A A A . Row3: A . A . A . Row4: . A A A . A Row5: A A . A A . Row6: A A . . . A Now compute pairs: Pair rows (1,6): Row1: . A . A A A Row6: A A . . . A Compare each column: col1: . vs A => wall unmatched => grey X? Output row1 col1 is '.' in output? Let's see output row1 col1 is '.' (given). Hmm not X. So maybe rule applied to both cells: the wall becomes X, but the open stays '.'? Output shows '.' at row1 col1, but row6 col1 maybe X? Let's check output row6 col1 is X (output row6: X R . . . R). Indeed row6 col1 is X. So each cell gets result based on its own side? So after folding, we produce output grid where each original cell is transformed: if it is a wall and its counterpart matches (both walls) => both become R. If it is a wall and counterpart is not wall => becomes X. If it is '.' stays '.'. Thus we need to compute for each cell individually. Let's verify other columns. col2: Row1 A vs Row6 A => both walls => both become R. Output row1 col2 is R (yes). Row6 col2 is R (yes). col3: Row1 . vs Row6 . => both open => both stay '.'? Output row1 col3 is '.' (yes). Row6 col3 is '.' (output row6 col3 is '.'), matches. col4: Row1 A vs Row6 . => wall unmatched => Row1 becomes X? Output row1 col4 is X (yes). Row6 col4 becomes X? Output row6 col4 is '.'? Wait output row6 col4 is '.' (row6: X R . . . R). Actually row6 col4 is '.' (since ro ... [5147 chars truncated]
"Two armies deploy across a battlefield divided by a river. Where soldier faces soldier across the water, the front line burns red with engagement. Where a soldier faces an empty position, they stand grey in uneasy vigilance, guarding against nothing."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Soldiers (azure) deployed across a battlefield, with unoccupied terrain (black) in between.
Do: Mirror the battlefield across the river at its horizontal center. Matched soldiers turn red. Unmatched soldiers turn grey. Empty terrain stays empty.
Grid: A 6x6 battlefield. The river runs along the horizontal midline.
"Actors rehearse a scene where each performer must find their understudy standing in the wings on the opposite side of the stage. When actor meets understudy, the spotlight blazes red. When an actor looks across and finds an empty chair, a grey melancholy settles over them."
120b: k=1
See: Performers (azure) positioned across a stage, with empty marks (black) where no one stands.
Do: Each actor looks to their mirror position across the stage's horizontal center. Paired actors glow red. Unpaired actors fade grey. Empty positions stay dark.
Grid: A 6x6 stage. The axis divides upstage from downstage.
We need to infer rule. From description: performers (azure 'A') across stage, empty marks black '.' where no one stands. Each actor looks to their mirror position across the stage's horizontal center. Paired actors glow red. Unpaired actors fade grey. Empty positions stay dark. So we have a 6x6 grid. Horizontal center means mirror across horizontal axis (i.e., vertical flip? Actually horizontal center line divides upstage (top rows) from downstage (bottom rows). Mirror across horizontal center means reflect vertically (top to bottom). So for each cell, its mirror is the cell symmetric across the middle horizontal line. Since 6 rows, the center is between rows 3 and 4. So row i mirrors row (7 - i). So row1 ↔ row6, row2 ↔ row5, row3 ↔ row4. Thus we pair positions (r,c) with (7-r,c). For each pair, if both have A (actors) then they become red R. If only one has A (unpaired) then that cell becomes grey X (and the other maybe stays black? Actually unpaired actor fades grey, meaning the actor cell becomes grey, the empty counterpart stays black). Empty positions stay black '.'. Check example to verify. Let's map example input 6x6. I'll label rows 1-6. Input: Row1: . A . A A A Row2: A A A A A . Row3: A . A . A . Row4: . A A A . A Row5: A A . A A . Row6: A A . . . A Now compute mirror pairs: Rows1↔6, 2↔5, 3↔4. Consider each column. We'll produce output given. Let's compute for each cell. I'll create matrix of output from example to verify rule. Given output: Row1: . R . X X R Row2: R R X R R . Row3: X . R . X . Row4: . X R X . X Row5: R R . R R . Row6: X R . . . R Now test rule. Take column1: Rows1-6 values: row1 '.' ; row6 'A' . Pair (1,1) '.' with (6,1) 'A'. Since only one A, the A should become grey X, and '.' stays '.'? Output row6 col1 is X (yes). Row1 col1 output '.' (stays black). Good. Column1 row2 vs row5: row2 'A', row5 'A' both A => both become R. Output row2 col1 R, row5 col1 R. Good. Column1 row3 vs row4: row3 'A', row4 '.' => only one A => A becomes X, '.' stays '.'? Output row3 col1 X, row4 col1 '.' . Yes. So rule matches. Now column2: Rows1 A, row6 A => both A => both R. Output row1 col2 R, row6 col2 R. Yes. Rows2 A, row5 A => both R. Output row2 col2 R, row5 col2 R. Yes. Rows3 '.' , row4 A => only A at row4 becomes X, row3 stays '.'? Output row3 col2 '.' (yes), row4 col2 X (yes). Good. Column3: Rows1 '.' , row6 '.' => both '.' => stay '.'? Output row1 col3 '.' yes, row6 col3 '.' yes. Rows2 A, row5 '.' => only A at row2 becomes X? Output row2 col3 X yes, row5 col3 '.' stays '.' (output row5 col3 '.' yes). Rows3 A, row4 A => both A => both R. Output row3 col3 R, row4 col3 R. Yes. Column4: Rows1 A, row6 '.' => only A at row1 becomes X? Output row1 col4 X yes, row6 col4 '.' stays '.' (output row6 col4 '.' yes). Rows2 A, row5 A => both R. Output row2 col4 R, row5 col4 R. Yes. Rows3 '.' , row4 A => only A at row4 becomes X. Output ro ... [5080 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants seeds in a raised bed, then presses a board down across the middle to stamp the soil. Seeds that find a partner pressed against them through the earth bloom red. Seeds that press against bare soil wither to grey husks."
120b: k=3
See: Seeds (azure) scattered in a garden bed, with bare soil (black) between them.
Do: Fold the bed along its horizontal center. Seeds meeting seeds bloom red. Seeds meeting bare soil turn grey. Bare soil stays bare.
Grid: A 6x6 garden bed. The fold is along the horizontal middle row.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid 6x6 with colors: '.' black, 'A' azure (seed), maybe other colors appear after transformation: R red, X grey, etc. Metaphor: fold along horizontal center (i.e., middle row). For 6x6, horizontal center is between rows 3 and 4? Actually middle row would be row 3? Wait 6 rows, horizontal center line is between rows 3 and 4 (since even). Folding along that line means we flip bottom half up onto top half (or top onto bottom). So we pair each cell with its counterpart mirrored across the horizontal center line. So row i pairs with row (7 - i) (since 1-indexed). Row1 with row6, row2 with row5, row3 with row4. Now rule: "Seeds meeting seeds bloom red. Seeds meeting bare soil turn grey. Bare soil stays bare." So when we overlay, we consider each pair of cells (top and bottom). The result cell (maybe in top half?) becomes: if both are A (seed) => R. If one is A and other is '.' => X (grey). If both '.' => '.' (bare soil stays bare). Also maybe if both are something else? But only A and . appear in inputs. Output examples show only R, X, and . (and maybe other colors? Not in examples). Let's verify with Example1. Let's compute to confirm. Example1 Input grid (6x6). Let's label rows 1-6. Row1: . A . A A A Row2: A A A A A . Row3: A . A . A . Row4: . A A A . A Row5: A A . A A . Row6: A A . . . A Now pair rows: 1 with 6, 2 with5, 3 with4. Compute each column. Pair row1 & row6: col1: row1 '.' , row6 'A' => one A one . => X (grey). Output row1 col1 is '.'? Wait output row1 col1 is '.' according to given output: ". R . X X R". That's '.' not X. Hmm maybe they keep top cell unchanged if bottom is '.'? Let's compute again: row1 col1 '.' top, row6 col1 'A' bottom. According to rule "Seeds meeting bare soil turn grey." So seed (bottom) meets bare soil (top) => grey. So should be X. But output shows '.'. Let's examine output row1 col1: '.' indeed. So maybe they only consider folding upward: bottom half folds onto top half, but the resulting cell is the top cell after overlay? Actually when folding, the bottom cell moves onto top cell; if they overlap, transformation occurs; else top cell remains as is? But they are overlapping all positions because same dimensions. So top cell becomes result of combination. So row1 col1 should be result of top '.' overlapped by bottom 'A' => seed meets soil => grey X. But output shows '.'. Maybe they consider folding the top half onto bottom half, and output is bottom half? Let's test: bottom row6 col1 'A' overlapped by top '.' => same scenario, seed meets soil => grey X. Output row6 col1 is "X"? Output row6 line: "X R . . . R". Row6 col1 is X indeed. So output row6 col1 is X. So they output the bottom half after folding? Let's see row6 col2: input row6 col2 'A', top row1 col2 'A' => seed meets seed => red. Output row6 col2 is R. Yes row6 line: "X R . . . R". So matches. Thus output grid corresponds to bottom half after folding top onto bottom (i ... [11068 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black (.) background containing several distinct rectangular objects made of blue (B) cells. Embedded within some of these blue rectangles are one or more azure (A) cells, which replace blue cells at certain positions. Each object is a contiguous rectangular blob of blue and azure cells, separated from other objects by at least one column or row of black cells.
Do: 1. Identify each distinct rectangular object composed of blue (B) and azure (A) cells. Objects are separated by black (.) background cells. 2. For each object, count the number of azure (A) cells it contains. 3. If an object contains 0 or 1 azure cells, keep it in place unchanged. 4. If an object contains 2 or more azure cells, remove it entirely by replacing all of its cells with black (.) background. 5. All kept objects remain at their original positions; the rest of the grid stays black.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background is black (.). The grid coordinate system is row-major with (0,0) at the top-left. Objects do not overlap and do not touch the edges of other objects.
"Azure is a disease — too much infection and the host body is condemned."
120b: k=1
See: Against a dark void, blue organisms float like cells under a microscope. Some cells appear perfectly healthy — pure blue tissue. Others show signs of azure infection, where the pathogen has replaced healthy blue tissue with azure lesions.
Do: A quarantine protocol sweeps the grid. Each organism is examined for infection. Those with only a single azure lesion — or none at all — have a strong enough immune response to survive and remain in place. But organisms riddled with two or more azure lesions are too far gone; the quarantine team erases them completely, leaving only darkness where they once lived.
Grid: The petri dish remains the same size after the purge. Surviving organisms hold their original positions, untouched and unaware of their neighbors' fate. The void claims everything else.
We need to infer rule. From description: blue organisms (B) are cells, azure infection (A). Rule: For each organism (connected component?) those with only a single azure lesion — or none — survive; those with two or more azure lesions are erased (set to .). Output shows many rows cleared after certain rows. In example 1, input grid 14x14? Output shows only top 5 rows unchanged, rest all '.'. Let's analyze example 1: Input shows many B and A scattered. Output retains same top 5 rows exactly same as input. Rows 6-14 become all '.'. Thus rule likely: Identify each "organism" maybe a contiguous region of B (blue) cells? The azure lesions are A cells within that region. If a region has <=1 A, keep region unchanged; else erase entire region (turn all its cells to .). In example, rows 6-14 contain B and A but perhaps they belong to regions that have >=2 A, thus removed. Let's test: Row6: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." contains B B A B. That region maybe connected to other B's above? Let's see connectivity: likely orthogonal adjacency (4-direction). The top region of B's in left side maybe separate from right side region. Row6's B's at columns 10-12 maybe part of region that extends upward? Look at rows 1-5: there are B's in columns 10-13 etc. Row1: "... B B ." etc. So there is a region of B's in right side that continues down. That region includes many A's? Let's count A's in that region across whole grid: In rows 1-5 there are some A's: row1 col6? Actually row1: ". . . . . B A B . . . B B ." includes A at col7? Row1 col7 is A. Row2: ". . . . . B B B . . . B B ." no A. Row3: "B B B B . B B B . . . B B ." no A. Row4: "B A B B . . . . . . . . . ." includes A at col2. Row5: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . ." no A. So region maybe includes those A's. Count A's in that region: row1 col7, row4 col2. That's 2 A's. So region has >=2 A, thus should be erased. Indeed rows 1-5 in output still have those B and A? Wait output rows 1-5 unchanged, still have A's. So my hypothesis wrong. Maybe the "organism" is each individual B cell considered as organism, and azure lesions are adjacent A cells? But description: "Each organism is examined for infection. Those with only a single azure lesion — or none at all — have a strong enough immune response to survive and remain in place. But organisms riddled with two or more azure lesions are too far gone; the quarantine team erases them completely". So each organism maybe a connected component of B cells (blue). Azure lesions are A cells that are adjacent (maybe orthogonal) to that component? If component has >=2 A cells adjacent (touching) then component removed. In example, top region (rows1-5) maybe has only 0 or 1 adjacent A? Let's examine adjacency: The A cells are within the region (i.e., part of component?) Actually A cells are azure lesions inside the organism, maybe they replace B cells. So they are part of same component? If component includes both B and A cells (blue tissue and azu ... [8743 chars truncated]
"Blue colonies drift on a dark petri dish. Azure mutations appear within some colonies — a single mutation is benign, even advantageous. But when mutations accumulate beyond a threshold, the colony's genome destabilizes and the organism dissolves back into the medium."
120b: fail
See: Bacterial colonies (blue clusters) on a dark agar surface, some harboring azure mutant cells.
Do: Colonies that have kept their genetic integrity persist. Those riddled with too many mutations are cleared by the immune response of the medium.
Grid: The dark agar remains. Surviving colonies sit undisturbed in their original positions. Dissolved colonies leave no trace.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including .). Output shows same size but many rows cleared to all '.' after row5. Observing: In input, there are blue B clusters and azure A cells within them. The description: colonies (blue clusters) some harboring azure mutant cells. Colonies that have kept genetic integrity persist. Those riddled with too many mutations are cleared. So rule likely: For each connected component of B (blue) cells, if it contains at most some number of A (azure) cells, it survives (kept). If too many A, the whole component is removed (set to .). In example, after row5, all remaining B and A are removed. Let's examine input rows 1-5 contain B clusters with some A. After row5, there are B and A in later rows but they are removed in output. So perhaps rule: Only keep the topmost (or first) colony? Or maybe keep colonies that are rectangular? Let's analyze more. In example input rows 1-5: there are B clusters forming shapes. Row6 onward also have B clusters but they are removed. Maybe rule: Keep only colonies that are "intact" meaning they have no A inside? But rows 1-5 have A inside some clusters (e.g., row1 col6 is B, col7 A, col8 B). So they have A but still survive. So maybe rule: Keep colonies that have at most one A? Let's check counts. In rows1-5, each cluster maybe has exactly one A? Row1: pattern B A B at columns6-8. Row2: all B. Row3: B B B B . B B B ... Row4: B A B B ... Row5: B B B B ... So each cluster maybe has 1 A. Later rows may have more A per cluster, causing removal. Let's examine later rows in input (row6 onward). Row6: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." there is a cluster with B B A B (two B then A then B). That's one A. Yet removed. So maybe rule also about size? Maybe only keep colonies that are "connected to the top edge"? The surviving clusters are in top-left area? Actually they are in rows1-5, columns1-? They are near top-left. Later clusters are lower rows maybe removed because they are "mutated" (too many A) or maybe because they are not "connected to the agar"? Not. Let's compute connectivity: B cells are 4-directionally adjacent? Likely orthogonal. The top region forms a large connected component of B (including many B across rows1-5). Let's see if they are all connected: Row1 has B at col6,8,12,13. Row2 B at col6-8,12-13. Row3 B at col1-4,6-8,12-13. Row4 B at col1,3,4, etc. So there is connectivity across rows via columns. Likely all B in rows1-5 are part of a single large component. That component includes some A cells (azure). It survives. Later rows have separate components not connected to the top component. Perhaps rule: Keep only the largest component (or the component with most B) and remove others. That would explain removal of later components. Let's test: The top component likely is largest. So output retains only that component unchanged; all other B and A become '.'. Check row6 onward: there are B cl ... [9439 chars truncated]
"Blue nebulae hang in the dark void of space. Some contain azure hot spots — regions of intense radiation. A single hot spot is a sign of stellar birth. But nebulae saturated with too many hot spots are being torn apart by their own energy and fade into the void."
120b: fail
See: Blue nebulae against the black of space, some containing azure radiation points.
Do: Survey each nebula's energy state. Those with gentle warmth endure. Those burning too brightly consume themselves and vanish.
Grid: The dark void persists. Stable nebulae remain in their celestial positions. Overactive ones dissipate completely.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 columns (including spaces). Output shows same size but many rows cleared after row5. Observing: In input, there are blue B clusters (nebulae) and azure A points inside some. The rule: "Survey each nebula's energy state. Those with gentle warmth endure. Those burning too brightly consume themselves and vanish." So maybe clusters of B with A inside: if cluster contains exactly one A (gentle warmth) it stays; if more than one A (too bright) disappears. In example, after row5, all rows become empty (all .). Let's examine input rows 6-14: they contain some B and A scattered. Output rows 6-14 are all . So those nebulae vanished. Why? Perhaps those clusters are "overactive" meaning they have more than one A? Let's check cluster connectivity: B cells likely form clusters (connected orthogonally?). In rows 6-14, there are B's but also A's. Let's see if any cluster contains A? Row6: "... . . . . . . . . B B A B ." So there is a small cluster of B B A B maybe 4 cells with one A. Yet it vanished. So maybe rule is about size: clusters with size > something vanish. Or maybe "gentle warmth endure" means clusters that have exactly one A and are surrounded by black? Not sure. Look at rows 1-5: they remain unchanged. So clusters in top part survive. Let's examine those clusters: rows1-5 contain many B and A. They remain unchanged. So rule selects which part of grid to keep: maybe only the topmost contiguous region of B's (the largest cluster) stays, others removed. In example, the top-left cluster of B's (big shape) remains; lower clusters removed. Check connectivity: In input, there is a large block of B's spanning rows1-5 columns? Let's map roughly. Row1: positions 6 B,7 A,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row2: 6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row3: 1-4 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row4: 1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5: 1-4 B. So there is a big cluster of B's covering left side rows1-5 columns1-4 plus some at columns6-8 etc maybe connected via adjacency? Yes they are connected via adjacency (orthogonal). So that's one big cluster. There are also some isolated B's at right side columns12-13 rows1-3 etc maybe connected to same cluster via row3 column12? Actually row3 column12 B is separated by columns9-11 which are . . . So not connected. So there are separate clusters on right side. Yet output retains those right side B's as well (rows1-3 columns12-13). So multiple clusters survive, not just one. Thus rule maybe: Keep clusters that have at least one A? Let's see: Right side clusters have B's but no A? Row1 col12 B,13 B no A. Row2 col12 B,13 B. Row3 col12 B,13 B. Those survive. So not about A. Maybe rule: Keep clusters that are "stable" meaning they have no A? But top-left cluster has A's (positions row1 col7 A, row4 col2 A, row5 none). Yet it stays. So not. Maybe rule: Keep clusters that are "complete" i.e., rectangular? Not. Let's examine rows6-14: why they vanish? Perhaps they ar ... [8784 chars truncated]
"Blue islands emerge from a dark sea. Some islands have azure sinkholes opening in their surface. A single sinkhole is just a tide pool — picturesque and harmless. But islands honeycomed with sinkholes are unstable and sink beneath the waves."
120b: fail
See: Blue islands in a dark ocean, some pocked with azure sinkholes.
Do: The cartographer surveys each island. Stable ones are charted. Those undermined by too many sinkholes are struck from the map as they submerge.
Grid: The dark sea remains. Solid islands stay at their charted positions. Sunken islands leave only open water.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grid with various colors, output seems to keep some patterns and erase others (turn to .). In example1, output retains top-left region same as input for first few rows, but later rows become all . (cleared). Let's compare. Example1 input size? Looks 14x14? Output same size. In output, rows 1-5 same as input rows 1-5. Row6 onward all . . So rule maybe: keep islands (connected components) that are "stable" i.e., not too many sinkholes (azure A?). Blue islands B, azure A are sinkholes? In description: Blue islands in dark ocean, some pocked with azure sinkholes. So B = island, A = sinkhole within island. If too many sinkholes, island submerges (removed). So we need to evaluate each connected component of B (blue) maybe with A inside. If number of A within component exceeds some threshold, remove entire component (turn B and A to .). In example1, which components survive? Let's examine input example1 first few rows: there is a cluster of B and A in top-left area rows1-5 columns? Those remain. Later there are other B clusters with A maybe? They become removed. Let's check row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." In output row6 all . So that cluster removed. So perhaps rule: keep only the largest blue island? But top-left cluster maybe largest? Let's see later rows also have B clusters maybe similar size. Need more analysis. Example2: Input 14x14. Output retains some B and A but many removed. Let's see which remain. Output rows: row3 (index starting 0?) Actually output row3 (line 3) has "... B A .". Input row3 (0-index?) Let's map. I'll index rows 0-13. Example2 Input rows: 0: all . 1: ". B A B . . . . . . . . . ." 2: ". B B A . B B B . . B A . ." 3: ". . . . . B A B . . B B . ." 4: ". . . . . B B A . . . . . ." 5: ". . . . . A B B . . . B B B" 6: ". . . . . . . . . . . B A B" 7: ". B B A . . . . . . . B B B" 8: ". A B B . . . . . . . . . ." 9: ". B B B . . . B B B . . . ." 10: ". . . . . . . B B B . . . ." 11: ". . . . . . . A B B . . . ." 12: ". . . . . . . B B B . . . ." 13: all . Output rows: 0 all . 1 all . 2 "... B A . ." Actually output row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . B A . ." Wait need check: Output row2 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . B A . .". So only B A at columns 11,12? Input row2 had B B A at col? Let's map columns 0-13. Input row2: ". B B A . B B B . . B A . ." So B at col1,2; A at col3; then .; B at col5,6,7; . . ; B at col10; A at col11; . . So output only retains B at col10 and A at col11 (the rightmost pair). So the left cluster removed. Row3 output: ". . . . . . . . . . B B . ." (only B B at col10,11). Input row3 had B A B at col5,6,7 and B B at col10,11. Output kept right side B B, removed left cluster with A. Row4 output all . (no B). Input row4 had B B A at col5,6,7. Removed. Row5 output: ". . . . . . . . . . . B B B" (kept rightmost B B B at cols 11,12,13?). Input row5 had A B B at col5,6,7 and B B B at 11,12,13. Output kept rightmost B B B, removed left cluster with A. Row6 output ... [11748 chars truncated]
"Blue circuit modules sit on a dark board. Some modules have azure short circuits in their wiring. A single short can be bypassed — the module functions. But modules with cascading shorts are fried beyond repair and must be desoldered from the board."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Blue circuit blocks on a dark PCB, some containing azure short-circuit faults.
Do: Run diagnostics on each module. Those with isolated faults remain operational. Those with systemic failures are removed.
Grid: The dark board remains. Functional modules stay mounted in their original positions. Failed modules are cleanly removed.
"Blue stone guardians stand in a dark temple. Some bear azure curse marks etched into their forms. A guardian with a single mark carries a blessing in disguise. But those branded with many marks have been claimed by the underworld and crumble to dust."
120b: fail
See: Blue stone figures in a dark temple chamber, some inscribed with azure sigils.
Do: The oracle reads each guardian's marks. Those barely touched by fate endure. Those heavily cursed are reclaimed by darkness.
Grid: The dark temple floor remains. Blessed guardians stand in their posts. Cursed ones dissolve, leaving empty alcoves.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including .). Output shows same size but many rows become all '.' after row5. Observing: In input, there are clusters of B and A etc. Output retains top-left region same as input for first 5 rows, but rows 6-14 become all '.'. Specifically, rows 1-5 unchanged. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." output row6 all '.' (14 '.') Row7 input: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." output row7 all '.'. Row8 input: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." output row8 all '.'. Rows 9-14 also become '.'. Thus rule: Keep only the topmost contiguous block of rows that contain at least one non-'.' maybe? But row6 had non-'.' but got cleared. So maybe we keep only rows where there is at least one column that has a "blue stone figure" (B) that is "barely touched by fate" vs heavily cursed. Metaphor: "Those barely touched by fate endure. Those heavily cursed are reclaimed by darkness." Could be about count of B's per column? Or maybe about cells that are part of a shape that is not fully surrounded? Let's examine pattern: In rows 1-5, there are B and A patterns forming maybe a shape? Let's view columns. I'll write coordinates. Row1: positions: col6 B, col7 A, col8 B, col12 B, col13 B. Row2: col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row3: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B, col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row4: col1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B. So shape is a 5x4 block top-left (rows3-5 columns1-4) plus some other region columns6-8 rows1-3 etc. Row6 onward have other B's but they are cleared. Maybe rule: Keep only the region that is "connected" to the top-left corner? The retained cells are those that are part of the largest connected component of non-'.' that touches the top edge? Let's test: The top-left block (rows3-5 col1-4) is connected to top edge via row3 col1-4 (row3 is not top row but row1-2 have no B in those columns). Actually top edge row1 col6-8 etc not connected to that block. But they are also retained. So maybe keep all cells that are part of any component that is "barely touched by fate" meaning components that have at most some number of A? Not. Let's examine connectivity: All non-'.' cells in rows1-5 are part of two separate clusters: cluster1: the left block rows3-5 col1-4 plus row4 col2 A etc. cluster2: the right cluster rows1-3 col6-8 and col12-13. Are they connected? No, they are separate. Both are retained. So rule may be: Keep only the topmost N rows where there is at least one column that has a continuous vertical line of non-'.' maybe? Let's see columns: column6 has B in rows1-3, then row4 '.' row5 '.' row6 '.' etc. Column7 has A,B,B in rows1-3, then row4 '.' etc. Column8 B,B,B rows1-3. Column12 B,B,B rows1-3, row4 '.' etc. So these columns have a vertical segment of length 3 at top. Maybe rule: Keep rows that are part of any column where the topmost non-'.' appears in row <= something? Not. Row6 had B at col10,11,12,13 etc but those ... [9973 chars truncated]
"Blue dancers form tableaux on a dark floor. Some dancers have azure ribbons trailing from their costumes. A single ribbon adds grace to the formation. But when ribbons tangle a group — too many streaming everywhere — the choreographer pulls them from the number entirely."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Groups of blue dancers on a dark stage, some trailing azure ribbons.
Do: The choreographer watches each group. Elegantly accented groups dance on. Over-decorated groups are cut from the performance.
Grid: The dark stage remains. Remaining groups hold their formations in place. Cut groups leave empty floor.
"Blue mineral deposits sit in dark bedrock. Some deposits contain veins of azure crystal running through them. A single vein makes the deposit precious — worth preserving. But deposits fractured by too many crystal intrusions are geologically unstable and erode away."
120b: fail
See: Blue mineral formations in dark rock, some threaded with azure crystal veins.
Do: The geologist surveys each deposit. Lightly veined formations are stable and remain. Over-fractured deposits crumble and wash away.
Grid: The dark bedrock remains. Stable deposits sit undisturbed. Eroded formations leave bare rock behind.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including .). Output shows same size but many rows become all '.' after row5. Let's compare. In example1, rows 1-5 unchanged. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." output row6: all '.' (14). Row7 input: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." output row7 all '.' etc. So rows 6-14 become empty. Why? Perhaps rule: keep only the topmost contiguous region of blue (B) and azure (A) that is "stable" i.e., not over-fractured. Maybe condition: if a row contains any '.'? Not. Look at input rows 1-5: they contain B and A but also some '.' at left side. Row6 onward also have B and A but also have '.' at left side as well. So not just presence. Maybe rule: keep only the largest connected component of B/A that is "stable" meaning not adjacent to edge? Let's examine connectivity. In rows1-5, there is a cluster of B/A in left side? Actually rows1-5 have B and A forming shapes near left side? Let's map coordinates. Row1: positions 6 B,7 A,8 B, 12 B,13 B. Row2: 6 B,7 B,8 B, 12 B,13 B. Row3: 1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row4: 1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5: 1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B. So there is a big cluster of B/A in top-left area (columns 1-8). Also some B at columns12-13 separate. Rows6-14 have B/A clusters but maybe they are "over-fractured" meaning they have any adjacent '.'? But top cluster also has '.' around. Maybe rule: keep only the region that is "stable": i.e., any B/A cell that has at least 2 orthogonal B/A neighbors? Or maybe "lightly veined formations are stable and remain" meaning cells that have exactly one A neighbor? Not. Let's examine which cells were removed. Row6 input had B at col10,11, A at12, B at13. Those were removed. Row6 had no other B/A. So those were removed. Row7 similar. Row8 had B at4-7, B at10-12, A at13. All removed. Row9 had B at4-9, A at10? Actually row9: ". . . B B A B . . . . . . ." Wait row9 input: ". . . B B A B . . . . . . ." (positions 4 B,5 B,6 A,7 B). Removed. Row10: ". . . B A B B . . . . . . ." (positions 4 B,5 A,6 B,7 B). Removed. Row11: ". . . B B B B . . . B A B B" (positions 4-7 B, 11 B,12 A,13 B,14 B). Removed. Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B A" (positions 11 B,12 B,13 B,14 A). Removed. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . B A A B" (positions 11 B,12 A,13 A,14 B). Removed. Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B B" (positions 11-14 B). Removed. Thus all rows after row5 become empty. So rule maybe: keep only the topmost contiguous region that touches the top edge? The cluster in rows1-5 touches top row (row1). The lower clusters are separated by a row of all '.'? Actually row6 has '.' in columns1-9, then B at 10-13. So there is a gap of '.' between top cluster and lower cluster. So maybe rule: keep only the region that is connected to the top edge (or left edge) via B/A cells. The top cluster is connected to top edge (row1). The lower clusters are not connected to top edge because there is a row of '.' separa ... [6633 chars truncated]
"Blue dough pieces rest on a dark marble countertop. Some contain flecks of azure spice. A pinch of spice gives character, but overseasoned dough turns bitter and must be discarded before it ruins the batch."
120b: fail
See: Portions of blue dough on a dark surface, some studded with azure spice flecks.
Do: Taste each portion. If the spice is barely there, it stays. If the flavor is overwhelming, throw it away.
Grid: The countertop remains clean and dark. Only the properly seasoned dough pieces remain where they were placed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x? Let's count rows: Example 1 input appears 14 rows, each row length maybe 14? Let's examine first row: ". . . . . B A B . . . B B ." that's 14 columns. Output same size, but many rows become empty (all .). Observing: In input, there are clusters of B (blue) and A (azure) etc. Output retains only top-left region? Actually output rows 1-4 same as input rows 1-4. Row5 same. Row6 onward become all . (cleared). In input rows 6-14 had some B and A etc but output cleared them. So rule: Keep only the "portion of blue dough on a dark surface, some studded with azure spice flecks." The metaphor: blue dough = B cells, azure spice flecks = A cells. Dark surface = . (black). Taste each portion. If the spice is barely there, it stays. If the flavor is overwhelming, throw it away. So maybe we look at connected components of B (blue) with A inside. If component has few A (barely there) keep component; if many A (overwhelming) remove component (set to .). In example, the top-left region (rows1-5) contains B and A but maybe low A count relative to B? The lower region rows6-14 also have B and A but maybe have more A proportion? Let's test. We need to identify components. The grid likely 14x14. Let's map components. I'll label coordinates (r,c). Row1: columns 6 B,7 A,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row2: col6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row3: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row4: col1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B. So top-left cluster includes rows1-5 columns1-4? Actually rows1-5 have B/A in columns1-4? Row1 columns1-5 are . . . . . So cluster maybe separate: there is a cluster at columns1-4 rows3-5 (B's). Row4 also has B A B B at cols1-4. Row3 has B B B B at cols1-4. That's a block of B with one A at (4,2). That's a component. Another component is at columns6-8 rows1-3 etc: B A B etc. That's another component with some A. Also component at columns12-13 rows1-5 etc. Now rows6-14 have B and A scattered but maybe they form separate components that have more A proportion? Let's examine row6: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." columns10 B,11 B,12 A,13 B. Row7: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." columns10 B,11 A,12 B,13 B. Row8: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." columns4 B,5 B,6 B,7 B,10 B,11 B,12 B,13 A. Row9: ". . . . . . . . B B A B" etc. Seems many components with A present. But output cleared rows6-14 entirely, not just some components. So maybe rule: Keep only the topmost contiguous region of B (blue) that contains at most one A? Or keep only the region where A count <= something threshold? Let's compute counts. Component1 (top-left block rows3-5 cols1-4 plus row4 col2 A). B count: rows3 (4 B), row4 (3 B), row5 (4 B) = 11 B. A count: 1. Ratio low. Component2 (columns6-8 rows1-3). B count: row1 col6 B, col8 B =2; row2 col6-8 B B B =3; row3 col6-8 B B B =3 => total B=8. A count: row1 col7 A =1; row4? none. So A=1. Ratio low. Component3 (columns12-13 rows1-5). B count: row1 col12 B,13 B =2; row2 col12 B,13 B=2; row3 co ... [6498 chars truncated]
"Blue instruments form ensembles on a silent dark stage. Some players hit azure dissonant notes. A lone dissonance adds tension and beauty. But when dissonance overtakes harmony, the ensemble is dismissed from the concert."
120b: fail
See: Clusters of blue musicians on a dark stage, some producing azure off-key tones.
Do: The conductor listens to each ensemble. Those with controlled dissonance may play on. Those drowning in discord are silenced.
Grid: The stage is dark and quiet except where the surviving ensembles continue to perform in their original positions.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 columns (including spaces). Output shows same size but many rows cleared to all '.' after row5. Let's compare. We need to see which elements survive. In input, there are B (blue) and A (azure) and maybe others? Only B and A present. Output retains some B and A in top-left area, rest become '.'. Specifically rows 1-5 unchanged. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." output row6 all '.' (14 '.') Row7 input: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." output row7 all '.'. Row8 input: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." output row8 all '.'. Rows 9-14 all become '.'. Thus rule: keep only clusters that meet some condition, maybe "controlled dissonance" meaning clusters of blue with some azure? Let's examine top-left region rows1-5 columns? Input rows1-5 have B and A in certain pattern. Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 1-14, cols 1-14. Row1: cols6 B,7 A,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row2: cols6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row3: cols1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B,6 B,7 B,8 B,12 B,13 B. Row4: cols1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5: cols1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B. So there is a cluster of B's forming a block top-left (rows3-5 cols1-4) plus some B/A in columns6-8 rows1-3 etc. The surviving region seems to be those that are part of a "connected component" that is "controlled dissonance" maybe meaning that the component contains at most one A? Let's check: In top-left block rows3-5 cols1-4 all B, no A. In rows1-3 cols6-8 there are B and A mixture: Row1 col6 B,7 A,8 B; Row2 col6 B,7 B,8 B; Row3 col6 B,7 B,8 B. This component includes one A (row1 col7). It survived. Other components: Row1 col12 B,13 B; Row2 col12 B,13 B; Row3 col12 B,13 B; Row4 col? none; Row5 none. That's a vertical column of B's at cols12-13 rows1-3. That survived as well (since output rows1-3 keep those). So multiple components survive. Now components that got removed: Row6 col10 B,11 B,12 A,13 B. That's a small cluster of B/A but maybe it's isolated? It is separate from others (distance). It got removed. Row7 similar. Row8 etc. Thus rule might be: Keep only components that are "connected to the border"? But top-left block touches left border (col1) and top border (row1). The column 12-13 block touches top border (row1). The removed components are interior not touching border. So maybe rule: Keep only components that touch the edge of the grid. Let's test: The surviving components all touch top edge (row1) or left edge. Indeed row1 has B/A components. The left block touches left edge. The column 12-13 also touches top edge. So rule: Remove any component not connected to any border (i.e., interior). That matches. Check if any component touches right or bottom edge? Not in example. Thus transformation: For each color (maybe only B and A), keep cells that belong to a connected component (4-directionally) that includes at least one cell on the outer border of the grid. All other cells become '.'. Now test input: we need to apply same rul ... [9548 chars truncated]
"Blue players form teams scattered across a dark field. Some players wear azure penalty markers. A team can carry one foul and play on, but accumulate too many infractions and the referee ejects the entire squad from the match."
120b: fail
See: Teams of blue players on a dark pitch, some bearing azure foul markers.
Do: The referee reviews each team's disciplinary record. Clean or barely penalized teams stay. Repeat offenders are sent off entirely.
Grid: The dark field remains. Only teams with acceptable records continue playing in their original formations.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input has 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including . and letters). Output shows many rows cleared after row5. In output rows 6-14 are all '.' (black). So rule: keep only top part where there is at least one blue (B) maybe? Let's examine input rows 1-5 contain B and A etc. Row6 has some B's at columns 10-13 etc. In output row6 becomes all '.' meaning those rows removed. So maybe rule: keep only rows where there is at least one A (azure)?? Row1 has A at col6? Actually row1: ". . . . . B A B . . . B B ." includes A. Row2 has no A? Row2: ". . . . . B B B . . . B B ." no A. Yet row2 kept. Row3 has no A? Row3: "B B B B . B B B . . . B B ." no A, kept. Row4 has A at col2? Row4: "B A B B . . . . . . . . . ." yes A, kept. Row5 has no A, kept. Row6 has A at col12? Row6: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." includes A, but row6 cleared. So not about A. Maybe rule: keep only rows that contain at least one B in first 5 columns? Let's see rows 1-5 have B in early columns. Row6 has B only at columns 10-11 etc, not early. Row6 cleared. Row7 also B at columns 10-13 etc, cleared. Row8 B at columns 4-6 etc? Row8: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." has B at col4, but row8 cleared. So not that. Maybe rule: keep only rows that have any B in column <=? Not. Maybe rule: keep only rows that have any B in same column as any B in previous rows? Not. Let's examine pattern: Output retains first 5 rows exactly same as input. All rows after row5 become all '.' regardless of content. So rule could be: keep only the topmost contiguous block of rows that contain at least one B in column 1? Row1 col1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 B at col1; row4 B; row5 B; row6 '.'; So row3-5 have B at col1, row6 '.'; but row1-2 also kept though they have '.' at col1. So not. Maybe rule: keep only rows that contain any B in column 2? Row1 col2 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 B; row4 A; row5 B; row6 '.'; still not. Maybe rule: keep only rows that have any B in column 6? Row1 B at col6, row2 B, row3 B, row4 '.'? row4 col6 '.'; row5 '.'; row6 '.'; but row4 kept. Maybe rule: keep only rows that have any B in the left half (columns 1-7) and also any B in right half? Not. Let's think about metaphor: "Teams of blue players on a dark pitch, some bearing azure foul markers. The referee reviews each team's disciplinary record. Clean or barely penalized teams stay. Repeat offenders are sent off entirely. Grid details: The dark field remains. Only teams with acceptable records continue playing in their original formations." Interpretation: Blue players = B cells. Azure foul markers = A cells (azure). Teams = maybe connected components of B (and maybe A) forming clusters? The referee reviews each team's disciplinary record: maybe count number of A within each connected component (team). Clean or barely penalized teams stay (i.e., components with 0 or 1 A). Repeat offenders (more than 1 A) are removed entirely (all cells of that component become .). Th ... [8878 chars truncated]
"Blue clouds float in a dark sky. Some carry azure lightning within them. A single spark of lightning makes a cloud dramatic but stable. But clouds that crackle with too much electrical charge become unstable and dissipate into nothing."
120b: fail
See: Blue cloud formations against a dark sky, some flickering with azure electrical discharges.
Do: Observe each cloud's charge. Those barely electrified hold together. Those overloaded with lightning evaporate.
Grid: The dark sky persists. Stable clouds remain fixed in their positions. Overcharged clouds vanish without a trace.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input has 14 rows, each with 14 columns (including spaces). Output same size but many rows cleared to all '.' after row5. Observing: In input, there are clusters of B and A (blue and azure) forming shapes? The description: clouds (blue) with azure electrical discharges. Overcharged clouds evaporate. So maybe clusters containing both B and A (blue with azure) are considered overcharged and removed. Those with only B (barely electrified) stay. In example, output retains first few rows unchanged, but later rows become all '.'. Let's examine input rows 1-5: they contain B and A patterns. Output rows 1-5 identical. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." Output row6 is all '.' (cleared). Row7 input: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." Output row7 all '.' . Row8 input: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." Output row8 all '.' . Row9 input: ". . . B B A B . . . . . . ." Output row9 all '.' . Row10 input: ". . . B A B B . . . . . . ." Output row10 all '.' . Row11 input: ". . . B B B B . . . B A B B" Output row11 all '.' . Row12 input: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B A" Output row12 all '.' . Row13 input: ". . . . . . . . . . B A A B" Output row13 all '.' . Row14 input: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B B" Output row14 all '.' . So rows 6-14 cleared entirely. Why? Perhaps because they contain any A (azure) that is adjacent to B? But rows 1-5 also have A. Let's examine pattern: maybe there is a contiguous region (cloud) of B and A that is "overcharged" if it contains more than a threshold of A? Or maybe rule: keep only the topmost contiguous region of B/A that is connected to the top edge? The description: "Stable clouds remain fixed in their positions. Overcharged clouds vanish without a trace." Could be that clouds that are not connected to the top (sky) evaporate. The top rows are anchored to top edge; lower rows not connected to top become removed. In example, the B/A clusters appear in top-left area? Let's map coordinates. Row1 col6 B, col7 A, col8 B. Row2 col6 B,7 B,8 B. Row3 col1-4 B, col6 B,7 B,8 B. Row4 col1 B,2 A,3 B,4 B. Row5 col1-4 B. So there is a cluster spanning rows1-5 columns1-8 maybe. This cluster touches top edge (row1). So it stays. The other clusters (rows6-14) are separate clusters not touching top edge, thus removed. Check row6: there is B at col10,11, A at col12, B at13. This cluster is isolated, not connected to top. So removed. Thus rule: Keep only the connected component(s) of B and A (maybe also other colors?) that are connected to the top edge; set all other cells (including B, A, maybe other colors) to '.' (black). In output, rows6-14 become all '.' even though they had B and A. Also note that any other colors (R,G,Y etc) not present in example. So rule likely: preserve only the topmost "cloud" (connected region of B and A) that touches the top row; erase everything else. But also note that in output rows6-14 are all '.' even though there were B's not connected to ... [8602 chars truncated]
"Blue buildings stand on dark ground. Some have azure cracks running through their walls. A single crack is cosmetic — the structure holds. But buildings riddled with fractures are condemned and demolished, leaving empty lots."
120b: fail
See: Blue structures on a dark landscape, some showing azure stress fractures.
Do: Inspectors evaluate each building. Minor damage is acceptable. Structurally compromised buildings are razed.
Grid: The dark ground remains. Sound buildings stand in their original locations. Condemned sites are cleared to bare earth.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including .). Output shows same size but many rows cleared to . after certain point. Observing: In input, there are blue structures (B) and azure (A). The description: "Blue structures on a dark landscape, some showing azure stress fractures. Inspectors evaluate each building. Minor damage is acceptable. Structurally compromised buildings are razed. The dark ground remains. Sound buildings stand in their original locations. Condemned sites are cleared to bare earth." Interpretation: Blue = building, Azure = damage? Minor damage acceptable (maybe A adjacent to B?). Condemned sites cleared to . (black). So we need to keep some B's and A's, remove others. Look at example: Input first rows have B and A patterns. Output first rows identical to input for first 5 rows. Then rows 6-14 become all . (cleared). In input rows 6-14 contain some B and A but also many . . Let's examine row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." Output row6: all . (cleared). So row6 had B's but they were removed. So rule likely: keep only the topmost contiguous region of buildings? Maybe evaluate each building cluster: if cluster has any A (damage) maybe it's condemned? But rows 1-5 have B and A and remain. Row6 also has B and A but removed. So maybe only keep the largest connected component? Let's see connectivity: In rows 1-5, there is a cluster of B's forming maybe a shape. Row6's B's are separate? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 1-14, cols 1-14. I'll note positions of B in rows 1-5. Row1: col6 B, col8 A, col9 B, col12 B, col13 B. Row2: col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row3: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B, col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row4: col2 A, col3 B, col4 B, col5 B? Wait row4: "B A B B . . . . . . . . . ." Actually row4: B A B B then rest . So col1 B, col2 A, col3 B, col4 B. Row5: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . ." => col1-4 B. So there is a big cluster of B's in top-left area (rows1-5, cols1-4 etc) plus some B's on right side columns 12-13 etc maybe separate. Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . . B B A B ." Actually row6: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." Wait count: row6 has B at col10? Let's recount: row6 string: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." That's 14 entries: cols1-9 ., col10 B, col11 B, col12 A, col13 B, col14 . So isolated cluster on right side. Row7: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." => B at col10, A col11, B col12, B col13. Row8: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." => B at col4-7, col10-12 B, col13 A. Row9: ". . . B B A B . . . . . . ." => B col4,5, A col6, B col7. Row10: ". . . B A B B . . . . . . ." => B col4, A col5, B col6,7. Row11: ". . . B B B B . . . . . . ." => B col4-7. Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B A" => B col11,12,13, A col14. Row13: ". . . . . . . . . . B A A B" => B col11, A col12,13, B col14. Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . B B B B" => B col11-14. So there are many clusters. Output cleared rows 6-14 entirely, meaning ... [8816 chars truncated]
"Blue fortifications are positioned across a dark battlefield. Some walls have been breached by azure siege damage. A single breach can be patched and defended. But when too many walls have fallen, the fortress is abandoned and left to crumble."
120b: fail
See: Blue fortresses on dark terrain, some showing azure points of siege damage.
Do: The general assesses each stronghold. Those with minor damage are reinforced. Those too compromised are abandoned entirely.
Grid: The dark battlefield remains. Defensible fortresses hold their ground. Abandoned ones dissolve into the landscape.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with colors: . black, B blue, A azure, etc. The description: "Blue fortresses on dark terrain, some showing azure points of siege damage. The general assesses each stronghold. Those with minor damage are reinforced. Those too compromised are abandoned entirely. Grid details: The dark battlefield remains. Defensible fortresses hold their ground. Abandoned ones dissolve into the landscape." Interpretation: Blue cells are fortresses, azure (A) are damage points. Minor damage reinforced (maybe keep A?), too compromised abandoned (maybe removed). Output shows only some cells remain, others become . (black). Let's examine Example1. Input grid 14x14. Output grid same size but many rows become all . after row5? Actually output rows 6-14 are all . . So only top-left region retained. Let's compare input vs output for first 5 rows. Row1 input: ". . . . . B A B . . . B B ." Output same row unchanged. Row2 same unchanged. Row3 same unchanged. Row4 same unchanged. Row5 same unchanged. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." Output row6: all . . So row6 had some B and A but they disappeared. Row7 input had B etc, disappeared. Row8 etc all disappeared. So rule maybe: keep only fortresses (B) that are part of a contiguous region that is "defensible" maybe fully surrounded by other B? Let's see region shape: In top-left area, there is a block of B's forming a rectangle? Let's map coordinates. Rows 1-5 columns? Let's list positions of B/A in rows1-5. Row1: col6 B, col7 A, col8 B, col12 B, col13 B. Row2: col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row3: col1 B,2 B,3 B,4 B, col6 B,7 B,8 B, col12 B,13 B. Row4: col1 B, col2 A?, actually row4: "B A B B . . . . . . . . . .". So col1 B, col2 A, col3 B, col4 B. Row5: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . .": col1-4 B. So this forms a cluster of B/A in top-left corner (rows1-5, cols1-8). Also there are B's at columns12-13 rows1-3 etc separate cluster maybe? Those also retained. Indeed they are kept. Rows6 onward have B's but they are removed. Why? Perhaps because they are not part of a "fortress" that is fully surrounded by .? Or maybe rule: keep only B cells that are part of a shape that contains at least one A (damage) but not too many? Let's examine row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B .". This cluster is isolated (columns10-12). It has B B A B. In previous top-right cluster rows1-3 columns12-13 also have B B etc but no A? Actually row1 col12 B, col13 B; row2 col12 B,13 B; row3 col12 B,13 B. No A there. Yet they are kept. So presence of A not required. Maybe rule: keep only the largest connected component of B/A? In example1, there are two components: left component (size maybe 4x4) and right component (size 3x2). Which is larger? Left component includes many cells (maybe 4x4 plus some). Right component includes 6 cells. The left component is larger. Both are kept though. So not just largest. Maybe rule: keep only components that are "defensible": i.e., have no holes ... [10418 chars truncated]
"Blue set pieces stand on a dark stage. Some have been marked with azure chalk by the stage manager — notes for revision. A single note means a minor tweak; the piece stays. But pieces covered in notes are pulled from the production entirely."
120b: fail
See: Blue props and set pieces on a dark stage, some marked with azure revision notes.
Do: The director reviews marked pieces. Lightly annotated ones get a quick fix and remain. Heavily marked ones are struck from the set.
Grid: The dark stage floor is bare where removed pieces stood. Approved pieces remain exactly where they were placed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 14x14? Let's count rows. Example 1 input shows 14 rows, each with 14 entries (including .). Output shows same size but many rows become all '.' after certain row. Let's compare. In example 1, rows 1-5 appear unchanged. Row6 in input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." output row6: all '.' (14 '.') Row7 input: ". . . . . . . . . B A B B ." output row7 all '.'. Row8 input: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." output row8 all '.'. Rows 9-14 also become all '.'. Thus rule: keep top part up to some boundary, remove rest. What determines boundary? Possibly based on presence of azure (A) marks? The description: "some marked with azure revision notes. Lightly annotated ones get a quick fix and remain. Heavily marked ones are struck from the set." So maybe rows with A count? In rows kept (1-5), there are A's present: row1 has A at col7? row1: ". . . . . B A B . . . B B ." yes A present. Row2: ". . . . . B B B . . . B B ." no A. Row3: "B B B B . B B B . . . B B ." no A. Row4: "B A B B . . . . . . . . . ." has A. Row5: "B B B B . . . . . . . . . ." no A. So A presence not the factor. Maybe rule: keep rows that contain any B (blue) in leftmost 5 columns? Not. Look at row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." there is B's but later columns. Row6 becomes cleared. So maybe rule: keep rows where there is at least one A in first half? Row1 has A at col7 (first half? 7 of 14). Row4 A at col2. Row2 no A but kept. So not. Maybe rule: keep rows until a row that has a '.' in column 1? But all rows start with '.' or B. Row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 B; row4 B; row5 B; row6 '.'; but row6 cleared. So maybe stop when a row has no B in first 5 columns? Row6 first 5 columns are '.' all, yes. Row1 first 5 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 B B B B (has B). Row4 B A B B (has B). Row5 B B B B (has B). So not. Maybe rule: keep rows that contain any B in column 6? Row1 column6 B (yes). Row2 column6 B. Row3 column6 B. Row4 column6 '.' (but row4 kept). So not. Maybe rule: keep rows that have any B in column 1-5? Row1 col1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 B; row4 B; row5 B. Row6 '.'; row7 '.'; row8 '.'; row9 '.'; row10 '.'; row11 '.'; row12 '.'; row13 '.'; row14 '.' . So after row5, all rows start with '.' (col1). Indeed rows 6-14 start with '.' (looking at input). Let's verify row8 input: ". . . B B B B . . B B B A ." starts with '.' yes. Row9: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." actually row9 in example input is ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait row9 in example input: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Actually row9 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (looking at given). Row9 output all '.'. Thus rule: keep rows that have a B in column1? But row3-5 have B at col1, row1-2 have '.' but kept. So not. Maybe rule: keep rows until a row that is all '.' after column5? Not. Let's examine columns: maybe keep rows where there is any B in column 10? Row1 column10 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 '.'; row4 '.'; row5 '.'; row6 column10 B (but row6 cleared). So not. Maybe rule: keep rows that contain ... [9122 chars truncated]
"Blue hedges grow in a dark garden. Some hedges show azure blight on their leaves. A touch of blight is manageable — prune and move on. But when blight has spread deeply through a hedge, the gardener uproots the whole thing to protect the rest."
120b: fail
See: Blue hedges arranged in a dark garden, some showing spots of azure blight.
Do: The gardener inspects each hedge. Slightly affected ones survive. Heavily blighted hedges are removed root and branch.
Grid: The dark soil remains. Healthy hedges stand in place. Removed hedges leave bare ground.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grids have blue hedges (B) and azure (A) etc. Output seems to keep some parts and clear others (set to .). In Example1, output retains top-left region same as input up to row5, then rows6-14 become all . (cleared). Actually check: Input rows 1-5 have some B and A. Output rows 1-5 identical. Row6 input had some B etc but output row6 all . . Row7 also cleared, etc. So rule maybe: keep only the "connected component" of hedges that is not "heavily blighted"? The description: Slightly affected ones survive, heavily blighted removed. Maybe A indicates azure blight spots. So hedges (B) with adjacent A maybe removed? Let's examine Example1: In rows1-5, there are A's present. For example row1: B A B pattern. Those remain. Row6 input: ". . . . . . . . . B B A B ." (positions 10-13). Output row6 all . So those B's and A's removed. Why? Perhaps because they are isolated (no neighboring B's?) Let's see connectivity: In Example1, the top-left cluster of B's forms a 5x? shape. Row6's B's are separate region not connected to top cluster? Actually row6 column10-13 B B A B. Row5 had no B's in those columns (row5 all .). So that region is isolated. So rule: keep only the largest connected component of B (and maybe A) and remove others. Let's test Example2. Example2 Input: many B and A scattered. Output retains some region near bottom right? Let's examine. Input rows: row2 has ". B A B . . . . . . . . . .". Output row2 all . So that region removed. Row3 input: ". B B A . B B B . . B A . .". Output row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . B A . ." So only the rightmost B A at columns 11-12 remain? Actually output row3 shows B at col12? Wait count: columns 1-14. Output row3: positions 12 B, 13 A? Let's map: row3 output: ". . . . . . . . . . . B A . ." So B at col12, A at col13. In input row3, there is B at col5? Actually input row3: ". B B A . B B B . . B A . ." Let's index: col1 .,2 B,3 B,4 A,5 .,6 B,7 B,8 B,9 .,10 .,11 B,12 A,13 .,14 . So output kept only the B at col11? Wait output shows B at col12? Let's recount: output row3 has B at col12? Actually we need align: output row3: after 11 dots, then B, A, ., . So B at col12, A at col13. That corresponds to input B at col11? No shift. Let's compute: If output col12 = B, that matches input col11 B? Off by one. Maybe I miscount. Let's write positions: Input row3: columns:1.,2B,3B,4A,5.,6B,7B,8B,9.,10.,11B,12A,13.,14. Output row3: columns:1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,6.,7.,8.,9.,10.,11.,12B,13A,14.,15.? Wait grid width maybe 14? In example they have 14 columns? Actually example rows show 14 entries? Let's count row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." =14. So output row3 has 14 entries: first 11 are ., then B, A, ., . That's 14? 11+1+1+1+? Actually 11 dots + B + A + . + . = 15. Something off. Let's recount: maybe there are 15 columns? Row1 has 14? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 14? Let's count quickly: 1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,6.,7.,8.,9.,10.,11.,12.,13.,14. Yes 14. So output row3 must have 14 entr ... [8761 chars truncated]
See: A 10x10 grid bordered entirely by grey (X) cells. Inside the border, there is an irregular cavity of black (.) cells surrounded by grey (X) cells that protrude inward from the border, creating a jagged opening. The cavity is connected and roughly spans from one corner region of the interior to the opposite corner region.
Do: Draw a diagonal line of azure (A) cells through the open cavity. Consider both diagonal directions: top-left to bottom-right (\) and top-right to bottom-left (/). For each direction, find the starting cell and trace the diagonal one step at a time (moving +1 row and +1 or -1 column per step). A diagonal begins at the first black (.) cell encountered along the appropriate edge of the cavity and continues as long as each successive cell is black (.). The diagonal stops just before it would land on a grey (X) cell. Compare the two candidate diagonals and choose the one that is longer. Replace each black cell along the chosen diagonal with azure (A). All other cells remain unchanged.
Grid: Grid is always 10x10. Grey (X) cells form the complete outer border (all of row 0, row 9, column 0, column 9) plus irregular inward protrusions that shape the cavity. The interior contains only black (.) cells before transformation. After transformation, some black cells become azure (A) along exactly one diagonal line. Coordinates are (row, column) with (0,0) at top-left.
"A beam of light finds the longest path through a fractured stone wall."
120b: k=4
See: A fortress of grey stone encloses a dark cavern. The walls are uneven—chunks of stone jut inward like broken teeth, leaving a jagged hollow of shadow (black) within. The cavern stretches loosely from one corner of the chamber toward the opposite.
Do: A beam of azure light seeks passage through the darkness. It can only travel diagonally, slicing corner to corner like sunlight through a cracked ceiling. The light tests both slants—descending left and descending right—but stone snuffs it out on contact. Whichever angle lets the beam travel farther before striking wall, that is the path it takes. Where the light touches shadow, it leaves a glowing azure trace. The stone and the remaining darkness are unmoved.
Grid: The fortress is always a 10×10 chamber. Grey stone forms every outer wall and reaches inward in jagged formations, sculpting the shape of the cavern. The cavern itself is pure darkness (black) before the light arrives. After the beam passes, a single diagonal streak of azure marks its journey through the dark. Nothing else changes.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey stone X forms outer wall and jagged interior, black . is cavern. Azure A is beam path diagonal from some start point on edge? Actually beam originates from "azure light seeks passage through the darkness. It can only travel diagonally, slicing corner to corner like sunlight through a cracked ceiling. The light tests both slants—descending left and descending right—but stone snuffs it out on contact. Whichever angle lets the beam travel farther before striking wall, that is the path it takes. Where the light touches shadow, it leaves a glowing azure trace. The stone and the remaining darkness are unmoved." Interpretation: Starting point likely at a corner of the cavern? Possibly at a point where black region touches outer wall? The beam starts from a point on the boundary of black region (cavern) that is adjacent to stone? Actually "beam of azure light seeks passage through the darkness. It can only travel diagonally, slicing corner to corner". It tests both slants—descending left and descending right—but stone snuffs it out on contact. Whichever angle lets the beam travel farther before striking wall, that is the path it takes. Where the light touches shadow, it leaves a glowing azure trace." Thus we need to find a starting black cell that is adjacent to stone? In examples, azure A appears as a diagonal line from some point near outer wall into interior, ending before hitting X. Let's examine Example1 input and output to see pattern. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Example1 Input grid: 10x10. I'll write rows: 0: X X X X X X X X X X 1: X . . . . . X X X X 2: X X . . . . X . . X 3: X . . . . . . . . X 4: X X . . . . . . . X 5: X X . . . . . . X X 6: X . . . . . . . . X 7: X . . X X . . . . X 8: X X X X X . X X . X 9: X X X X X X X X X X Output same but with A's: Row1: X A . . . . X X X X (A at (1,1)) Row2: X X A . . . X . . X (A at (2,2)) Row3: X . . A . . . . . X (A at (3,3)) Row4: X X . . A . . . . X (A at (4,4)) Row5: X X . . . A . . X X (A at (5,5)) Row6: X . . . . . A . . X (A at (6,6)) Row7: X . . X X . . A . X (A at (7,7)) Row8: X X X X X . X X A X (A at (8,8)) So diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8). Starting point (1,1) is a black cell originally? Input row1 col1 was '.' yes black. It is adjacent to outer wall? At (1,1) its up neighbor (0,1) is X (stone). left neighbor (1,0) is X. So it's a black cell that is adjacent to stone on two sides (corner). The beam travels diagonally down-right (descending right) until just before hitting stone at (9,9) which is X (outer wall). Actually (8,8) is black originally? Input row8 col8 is '.'? Row8: "X X X X X . X X . X" So col8 (0-index) is '.' yes black. Next diagonal step would be (9,9) which is X, so stops before stone, leaving A at (8,8). So path is maximal diagonal from a starting black cell that is adjacent to stone (touching at corner?) The beam chooses direction (down-right or down-left) whichever yields longer pat ... [8798 chars truncated]
"A nerve impulse finds the longest unobstructed axon through tangled tissue."
120b: k=4
See: A mass of dense grey tissue surrounds an irregular gap of empty black intercellular space. The tissue forms a complete outer membrane with jagged projections reaching inward.
Do: A nerve signal (azure) fires along the longest possible diagonal axon through the open space. It starts where the gap begins and travels diagonally, one cell per step, until tissue blocks its path. Both diagonal directions are attempted; the longer viable path carries the impulse.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is tissue, black (.) is intercellular void, azure (A) is the fired nerve signal tracing a diagonal path through the void.
We need to infer rule: In each example, we have grey X as tissue forming outer border and interior shapes, black . as void. The rule: find longest diagonal path through void starting from the "gap begins" i.e., the first void cell adjacent to tissue? Let's analyze. Example1 input: Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. The output shows azure A placed along a diagonal from near top-left interior to bottom-right interior. Let's locate A positions. Example1 output A positions: Row1 col1? Actually row0 all X. Row1: "X A . . . . X X X X" So A at (1,1). Row2: "X X A . . . X . . X" A at (2,2). Row3: "X . . A . . . . . X" A at (3,3). Row4: "X X . . A . . . . X" A at (4,4). Row5: "X X . . . A . . X X" A at (5,5). Row6: "X . . . . . A . . X" A at (6,6). Row7: "X . . X X . . A . X" A at (7,7). Row8: "X X X X X . X X A X" A at (8,8). So diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8) inclusive, length 8 cells. Input void cells along that diagonal? Let's check input example1: Input grid row1 col1 is '.'? Row1 (index1) line: "X . . . . . X X X X" So col1 '.' yes. Row2 col2? Row2 line: "X X . . . . X . . X" col2 '.' yes. Row3 col3? Row3 line: "X . . . . . . . . X" col3 '.' yes. Row4 col4? Row4 line: "X X . . . . . . . X" col4 '.' yes. Row5 col5? Row5 line: "X X . . . . . . X X" col5 '.' yes. Row6 col6? Row6 line: "X . . . . . . . . X" col6 '.' yes. Row7 col7? Row7 line: "X . . X X . . . . X" col7 '.'? Let's count: columns 0-9. Row7: X (0) .(1) .(2) X(3) X(4) .(5) .(6) .(7) .(8) X(9). So col7 '.' yes. Row8 col8? Row8 line: "X X X X X . X X . X" col8 '.' yes. So the diagonal of void cells exists. The rule: find longest possible diagonal through void that starts at the "gap begins" where void region touches outer tissue? The void region is irregular shape inside grey border. The diagonal path goes from one edge of void region to another, moving along a diagonal direction (NE-SW or NW-SE). Both directions attempted; choose longer viable path. In example1, there are two possible diagonals? Let's see other diagonal direction (top-right to bottom-left). Starting maybe at (1,8?) but there is X there. So maybe only one long diagonal. Example2: Output A positions: Row1 (index1) "X X X . X . X . A X": A at (1,8). Row2: "X X . . X . . A . X": A at (2,7). Row3: "X . . . . . A . . X": A at (3,6). Row4: "X X . . . A . . . X": A at (4,5). Row5: "X X X . A . . . X X": A at (5,4). Row6: "X . . A . . . . . X": A at (6,3). Row7: "X . A . . . . X X X": A at (7,2). Row8: "X X . X . . X X X X": no A. So diagonal from (1,8) down-left to (7,2). That's a NW-SE? Actually direction is down-left (southwest). Coordinates decreasing column as row increases. That's a diagonal of length 7? Starting at (1,8) to (7,2). Check input void cells along that diagonal: Input example2 row1 col8 '.'? Row1 line: "X X X . X . X . . X" col8 '.' yes. Row2 col7 '.'? Row2 line: "X X . . X . . . . X" col7 '.' yes. Row3 col6 '.'? Row3 line: "X . . . . . . . . X" col6 '.' yes. Row4 col5 '.'? Row4 line: "X X . . . . . . . X" ... [7371 chars truncated]
"A comet traces the longest diagonal corridor through a nebula's dust lanes."
120b: k=1
See: Dense grey cosmic dust fills the field, with an irregular black clearing of empty space carved through it. The dust intrudes from all sides in uneven filaments.
Do: An azure comet streaks diagonally through the clearing, choosing the angle that lets it travel the farthest unobstructed. Each empty cell along its diagonal path becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is dust, black (.) is empty space, azure (A) is the comet's diagonal trail.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10 with X grey dust, . black empty. Output same X unchanged, but some . become A along a diagonal line (azure) starting somewhere in the empty region, traveling diagonally (presumably down-right?) until hitting dust or edge. Let's examine example. I'll map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input example1 rows: 0: X X X X X X X X X X 1: X . . . . . X X X X 2: X X . . . . X . . X 3: X . . . . . . . . X 4: X X . . . . . . . X 5: X X . . . . . . X X 6: X . . . . . . . . X 7: X . . X X . . . . X 8: X X X X X . X X . X 9: X X X X X X X X X X Output same X, but A placed: Row1 col1? Output row1: X A . . . . X X X X (col1 index1). So A at (1,1). Row2: X X A . . . X . . X => A at (2,2). Row3: X . . A . . . . . X => A at (3,3). Row4: X X . . A . . . . X => A at (4,4). Row5: X X . . . A . . X X => A at (5,5). Row6: X . . . . . A . . X => A at (6,6). Row7: X . . X X . . A . X => A at (7,7). Row8: X X X X X . X X A X => A at (8,8). So diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8). That's a main diagonal (down-right). Starting point appears to be the first empty cell (.) that is part of a contiguous empty region? Let's see input: At (1,1) there is '.' indeed. The diagonal path goes through empty cells; all those positions were '.' in input. Check (2,2) input row2 col2: row2 is "X X . . . . X . . X": col2 index2 is '.' yes. (3,3) input row3 col3 '.' yes. (4,4) row4 col4 '.' yes. (5,5) row5 col5 '.' yes. (6,6) row6 col6 '.' yes. (7,7) row7 col7 '.'? Row7: "X . . X X . . . . X": indices: 0 X,1 .,2 .,3 X,4 X,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 X. So col7 '.' yes. (8,8) row8: "X X X X X . X X . X": col8 '.' yes. So diagonal passes through empty cells. Why start at (1,1)? Could be the topmost-leftmost empty cell that can start a diagonal that goes farthest unobstructed (max length). The description: "azure comet streaks diagonally through the clearing, choosing the angle that lets it travel the farthest unobstructed. Each empty cell along its diagonal path becomes azure." So we need to find a diagonal direction (maybe four possible: down-right, down-left, up-right, up-left) that yields longest possible line of consecutive empty cells within the empty region (clearing). Choose angle that lets it travel farthest unobstructed. In example, the longest diagonal of empty cells is from (1,1) to (8,8) length 8? Actually includes 8 cells (positions (1,1) to (8,8) inclusive). Could there be longer diagonal elsewhere? Let's examine other diagonals: maybe down-left from some start? But the clearing shape irregular. The longest diagonal appears to be that main diagonal. Thus rule: find the longest contiguous line of '.' cells along any of the four diagonal directions (NW-SE or NE-SW). Then color those cells A. If multiple equal length, maybe choose one with some tie-breaking (maybe topmost-leftmost start). In example, there is also a diagonal from (1,6?) but that's X. Not. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid: Row0: X X X X X X X ... [6893 chars truncated]
"A current threads the longest diagonal channel through a jagged reef."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey coral reef forms a closed border with irregular spurs reaching inward, leaving a connected black channel of open water between them.
Do: An azure current flows diagonally through the channel, choosing whichever diagonal direction gives the longest unblocked run before hitting reef. Each open water cell on its path turns azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is reef, black (.) is open water, azure (A) is the current's diagonal path.
"A signal propagates along the longest diagonal trace through gaps in a circuit board's ground plane."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A grey ground plane fills the board with irregular cutouts forming a connected black void. The plane's edges jut inward unevenly.
Do: An azure signal trace is routed diagonally through the void, choosing the direction that allows the longest uninterrupted run. Each void cell the trace crosses becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is ground plane, black (.) is void, azure (A) is the signal trace's diagonal path.
"Ariadne's thread stretches along the longest diagonal passage through the labyrinth."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey stone walls form the outer boundary and irregular internal partitions of a labyrinth, leaving a connected black passage winding through the interior.
Do: An azure thread is drawn taut diagonally through the passage, choosing the direction that spans the most open cells before meeting a wall. Each passage cell it crosses becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is stone wall, black (.) is passage, azure (A) is the thread's diagonal line.
"A dancer leaps along the longest diagonal clearing across a cluttered stage."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey props and scenery clutter the stage, leaving an irregular connected black clearing of open floor. The clutter intrudes from the edges at odd angles.
Do: An azure trail marks the dancer's diagonal leap across the clearing, choosing the direction that lets them cover the most open floor. Each open cell on the leap's path turns azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is clutter, black (.) is open floor, azure (A) is the dancer's diagonal trail.
"A vein of crystal grows along the longest diagonal fracture through bedrock."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Solid grey bedrock contains an irregular black fracture network. The rock intrudes unevenly from the edges, shaping the fracture into a jagged connected void.
Do: An azure crystal vein mineralizes along the longest possible diagonal through the fracture, choosing the direction that extends farther before hitting solid rock. Each fracture cell on its path becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is bedrock, black (.) is fracture, azure (A) is the crystal vein's diagonal path.
"A skewer is threaded through the widest opening in a rough-cut roast."
120b: k=1
See: A thick grey crust encases a pocket of raw black filling. The crust is uneven, with ridges poking inward, leaving an irregular hollow inside.
Do: A long azure skewer is pushed diagonally through the raw filling, choosing the angle that lets it pass through the most filling before hitting crust. It enters at one edge of the cavity and exits at the other, marking each cell it passes through.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is crust, black (.) is raw filling, azure (A) marks the skewer's diagonal path through the filling.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid has grey X as crust, black . as filling. Output adds azure A along a diagonal line through the filling, starting at one edge of cavity (the interior region of black?) and exiting other side, maximizing length within filling before hitting crust. We need to find the longest diagonal line (any of 4 diagonal directions?) that passes through black cells only, staying within the region of black (i.e., not crossing X). The line must start and end at boundary of black region (i.e., adjacent to X or grid edge?) The description: "long azure skewer is pushed diagonally through the raw filling, choosing the angle that lets it pass through the most filling before hitting crust. It enters at one edge of the cavity and exits at the other, marking each cell it passes through." Thus we need to find the longest possible diagonal (45-degree) line of consecutive black cells (.) within the cavity, such that extending beyond the endpoints would hit X (crust) or grid edge? In example, we can verify. Let's map example input coordinates (0-index). I'll write grid 10x10. Row0: all X. Row1: X . . . . . X X X X Row2: X X . . . . X . . X Row3: X . . . . . . . . X Row4: X X . . . . . . . X Row5: X X . . . . . . X X Row6: X . . . . . . . . X Row7: X . . X X . . . . X Row8: X X X X X . X X . X Row9: all X. Now output shows A placed along a diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8?) Let's see coordinates where A appear. Row1 col1 = A (was .) Row2 col2 = A (was .) Row3 col3 = A (was .) Row4 col4 = A (was .) Row5 col5 = A (was .) Row6 col6 = A (was .) Row7 col7 = A (was .) Row8 col8 = A (was .) Actually row8 col8 is '.'? Input row8 col8 is '.' (since row8: X X X X X . X X . X) yes col5 is ., col8 is . So A at (8,8). So diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8) inclusive length 8 cells. That's a main diagonal (down-right). Are all those cells originally '.'? Let's check each: (1,1) row1 col1 '.' yes. (2,2) row2 col2 '.'? row2 col2 is '.'? Row2: X X . . . . X . . X, col0 X,1 X,2 ., yes. (3,3) row3 col3 '.' yes. (4,4) row4 col4 '.' yes. (5,5) row5 col5 '.' yes. (6,6) row6 col6 '.' yes. (7,7) row7 col7 '.'? Row7: X . . X X . . . . X, col7 is '.' yes. (8,8) row8 col8 '.' yes. Now are there any longer diagonal possible? Let's see other diagonals maybe longer? The cavity shape maybe irregular but this diagonal passes through many cells. Thus rule: find longest contiguous diagonal of '.' cells (NE-SW or NW-SE) that is fully within cavity (i.e., not crossing X). If multiple, choose one with maximum length; maybe tie-breaking? Not needed. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid: Row0: X X X X X X X X X X Row1: X X X . . . . . X X Row2: X X . . . . . . X X Row3: X X X . . . . . . X Row4: X . . . . . . X X X Row5: X . . . . . X X X X Row6: X . . . . . . . . X Row7: X . . X X . . X . X Row8: X X X X X X X X . X Row9: X X X X X X X X X X Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. We need to find longest diagonal of '.' cells. First, list positions of '.'. Row1: cols3 ... [7021 chars truncated]
"A glissando slides across the longest open interval between clusters of muted strings."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A frame of grey muted strings surrounds a region of black silent strings. The muted strings jut inward irregularly, shaping the silence into a jagged corridor.
Do: A bright azure glissando sweeps diagonally across the silent strings, choosing the diagonal direction that lets it ring through more strings before hitting a muted one. Each silent string it crosses becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) represents muted strings, black (.) represents silent strings, azure (A) marks the glissando's diagonal sweep.
"A ball is kicked on the longest diagonal run through a gap in the defensive wall."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey defenders form a complete perimeter with irregular formations pressing inward, leaving a jagged black corridor of open field between them.
Do: An azure ball is struck diagonally through the open corridor, choosing the angle that allows the longest uninterrupted run before hitting a defender. Each open cell along the ball's path is marked azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is defenders, black (.) is open field, azure (A) traces the ball's diagonal path.
"Lightning chooses the longest diagonal rift in the stormclouds to strike through."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dense grey stormclouds fill the sky, with an irregular black rift of clear air running through them. The clouds press inward from all edges, narrowing the opening unevenly.
Do: A bolt of azure lightning arcs diagonally through the clear rift, selecting whichever diagonal direction gives the longest unobstructed path. Each clear cell the bolt passes through turns azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is cloud, black (.) is clear sky, azure (A) is the lightning bolt's diagonal path.
"A beam of azure light is cast through the longest diagonal sightline in a ruined cathedral."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Crumbling grey stone walls form the shell of a cathedral, with rubble jutting inward irregularly. Between the rubble lies a connected black void of open air.
Do: Azure light enters the ruin and traces the longest possible diagonal sightline through the open void, one step per row. Both diagonal angles are tested; the one that passes through more open cells is chosen. Each cell it illuminates becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is stone, black (.) is open air, azure (A) is the light beam's diagonal path.
"An arrow is loosed through the widest diagonal gap in a fortress's broken battlements."
120b: k=1
See: Grey fortifications form a sealed outer wall with irregular parapets and buttresses projecting inward, creating a jagged black breach in the defenses.
Do: An azure arrow flies diagonally through the breach, choosing the angle that allows it to travel the farthest before striking stone. Each empty cell on its path is marked azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is fortification, black (.) is breach, azure (A) is the arrow's diagonal trajectory.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid with X grey walls, . black breach (a region). Output adds A azure along a diagonal from some start point at breach outward? Let's examine example. I'll rewrite coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input example1 grid 10x10. I'll map. Row0: all X. Row1: X . . . . . X X X X Row2: X X . . . . X . . X Row3: X . . . . . . . . X Row4: X X . . . . . . . X Row5: X X . . . . . . X X Row6: X . . . . . . . . X Row7: X . . X X . . . . X Row8: X X X X X . X X . X Row9: all X. Output same X unchanged, but some '.' become 'A' along a diagonal line. Let's list positions where output has A. Row1 col1? Output row1: X A . . . . X X X X => A at (1,1). Input had '.' there. Row2: X X A . . . X . . X => A at (2,2). Input '.'. Row3: X . . A . . . . . X => A at (3,3). Input '.'. Row4: X X . . A . . . . X => A at (4,4). Input '.'. Row5: X X . . . A . . X X => A at (5,5). Input '.'. Row6: X . . . . . A . . X => A at (6,6). Input '.'. Row7: X . . X X . . A . X => A at (7,7). Input '.'? Input row7 col7 was '.' (since row7: X . . X X . . . . X). Yes. Row8: X X X X X . X X A X => A at (8,8). Input row8 col8 was '.' (since row8: X X X X X . X X . X). Yes. Thus A's form a diagonal from (1,1) down-right to (8,8). That's a line of length 8. What about the breach? The black '.' region seems to be interior area. The diagonal passes through the "breach" which is the black cells? The description: grey fortifications form sealed outer wall with irregular parapets and buttresses projecting inward, creating a jagged black breach in the defenses. So black cells are the breach (holes) inside the grey wall. The azure arrow flies diagonally through the breach, choosing the angle that allows it to travel the farthest before striking stone. Each empty cell on its path is marked azure. Thus we need to find a diagonal line (NW-SE or NE-SW) that starts at a black cell on the outer edge of the breach? Actually the arrow flies diagonally through the breach, choosing angle that allows it to travel farthest before hitting stone (grey X). So we need to consider all possible diagonal lines that go through black cells (.) and continue until hitting X (grey). Choose the line that yields maximum number of '.' cells traversed before hitting X? Or farthest distance before hitting stone (X). In example, the diagonal from (1,1) to (8,8) passes through only '.' cells (since those positions were '.' originally) and ends at (9,9) which is X (border). Actually (9,9) is X (row9 col9). So the arrow traveled from entry point at (1,1) (which is adjacent to X? Row1 col1 is adjacent to X at row0 col0? Row0 col0 is X, also row1 col0 is X, row0 col1 is X). So the arrow started at the first '.' cell inside the breach along that diagonal, and continued until just before hitting X at (9,9). The length is 8 cells. Are there other possible diagonals? Let's see other '.' cells maybe form other diagonals but shorter. Thus rule: Find the longe ... [7905 chars truncated]
"A spotlight sweeps the longest diagonal across the stage between set pieces."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey set pieces and wings frame an irregular black stage area. The pieces jut out at odd angles, creating an uneven open performance space.
Do: An azure spotlight beam sweeps diagonally across the open stage, choosing the direction that illuminates the most floor before hitting a set piece. Each open cell in its path turns azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is set pieces, black (.) is open stage, azure (A) is the spotlight's diagonal path.
"A root pushes along the longest diagonal seam through compacted soil."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Dense grey clay surrounds an irregular pocket of loose black earth. The clay intrudes unevenly, creating a jagged underground cavity.
Do: An azure root grows diagonally through the loose earth, choosing the direction that lets it extend the farthest before hitting clay. Each loose cell it passes through becomes azure.
Grid: 10x10 grid. Grey (X) is clay, black (.) is loose earth, azure (A) is the root's diagonal growth path.
See: The input is a 10x10 grid with an orange (O) background containing scattered blobs of up to five non-orange colors: grey (X), red (R), azure (A), maroon (W), and magenta (M). Each color appears as one or more distinct connected components (clusters of same-colored cells connected horizontally, vertically, or diagonally via 8-connectivity). Some components are compact shapes (crosses, rectangles, L-shapes), while others are single isolated cells or irregular groups.
Do: 1. Identify every non-orange color present in the input. The five possible colors each have a fixed column assignment in the output: grey (X) → column 0, red (R) → column 1, azure (A) → column 2, maroon (W) → column 3, magenta (M) → column 4. 2. For each color, count the number of distinct 8-connected components (groups of same-colored cells where each cell touches at least one other cell in the group horizontally, vertically, or diagonally). 3. Let the maximum component count across all five colors be H. The output grid has H rows and 5 columns. 4. Fill the output with orange (O), then for each color, fill its assigned column from the bottom row upward for as many rows as that color's component count. Colors not present in the input get height 0 (their column stays all orange).
Grid: The input is always a 10x10 grid with orange (O) as the background color. The output is an H×5 grid, where H equals the largest number of 8-connected components found for any single color. The output background is orange (O). Columns are indexed 0–4 from left to right, each permanently assigned to one color: col 0 = grey, col 1 = red, col 2 = azure, col 3 = maroon, col 4 = magenta.
"A bartender pours drinks into five reserved glasses, each glass filling according to how many parties of that color showed up tonight."
120b: k=1
See: An orange dance floor hosts gatherings of up to five different colored crowds—grey, red, azure, maroon, and magenta. Some crowds cluster into tight formations like crosses or blocks, while others splinter into loners scattered across the floor. Each color may have thrown one big party or fragmented into several smaller cliques that don't touch each other, even at the corners.
Do: The bartender has five glasses lined up on the counter, each permanently reserved for one color. At closing time, she counts how many separate cliques each color brought to the dance floor—friends who stuck together count as one group, even if they're only touching diagonally. She then pours into each glass one unit for every clique that color fielded. The tallest glass determines how tall the counter display is; shorter pours just leave empty space above. Colors that never showed up get nothing in their glass.
Grid: The dance floor is always a 10×10 venue awash in orange. The counter display is a lineup of exactly five glasses arranged left to right—grey's glass, red's glass, azure's glass, maroon's glass, magenta's glass—each filled from the bottom up. The display is only as tall as the fullest glass, and any unfilled space above a pour remains orange, like air above the liquid line.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid 10x10 orange background with colored cells (M,R,A,W etc). Output is a small grid of 5 columns (glasses) and height equal to max number of connected components per color? Let's examine example. Example 1 Input grid 10x10 with colors: W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Output grid shown: Output: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. Columns correspond to order: grey (X), red (R), azure (A), maroon (W), magenta (M). In example, there is no grey or azure, so those columns maybe empty? Output shows first column O (orange) for both rows, meaning no fill in grey glass. Second column has R in bottom row only (since red had 1 component?). Third column O both rows (no azure). Fourth column W in bottom row only (maroon). Fifth column M in both rows (magenta). So height is 2 rows because max components among colors is 2 (magenta had 2 components). Let's verify. Count components in input example 1. Let's map positions. Input grid lines: Row0: O O O O O O O O W W Row1: O O M O O O O O W W Row2: O M M M O O O W O O Row3: O O M O O O W O O O Rows4-5 all O. Row6: R O R O O O O M O O Row7: O R O O O O M M M O Row8: R O R O O O O M O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O We need to count connected components for each color, using connectivity? The description: "friends who stuck together count as one group, even if they're only touching diagonally." So connectivity includes diagonal adjacency (8-direction). So components are 8-connected. Now count components: Red (R): positions: (6,0), (6,2), (7,1), (8,0), (8,2). Let's see connectivity: Are they all connected via 8-neighbor? Let's map coordinates (row,col). (6,0) adjacent to (7,1) diagonally, also (6,2) is two columns away not adjacent. (7,1) adjacent to (8,0) diagonal and (8,2) diagonal? (8,2) is two rows down and two columns right from (6,0) not directly. But via (7,1) they connect. Also (6,2) adjacent to (7,1) diagonal, and to (8,2) vertical? (8,2) is two rows down, same column, distance 2 rows, not adjacent. But (6,2) adjacent to (7,1) diagonal, so all reds are connected via (7,1). So single component. So red count =1. Maroon (W): positions: (0,8),(0,9),(1,8),(1,9),(2,7),(3,6). Let's see connectivity: (0,8) adjacent to (0,9) horizontally, also (1,8) diagonal, etc. (2,7) is at row2 col7, adjacent to (1,8) diagonal, so connected. (3,6) adjacent to (2,7) diagonal. So all W are connected as one component. So maroon count=1. Magenta (M): positions: (1,2), (2,1),(2,2),(2,3),(3,2),(6,7),(7,6),(7,7),(7,8),(8,7). Let's see connectivity: The cluster at top left (rows1-3) are connected together. The cluster at bottom right (rows6-8) are connected together. Are they connected via diagonal? Distance between (3,2) and (6,7) far, not. So two separate components. So magenta count=2. Thus max components =2, matches output height 2 rows. Now output grid: each column corresponds to color order: grey (X), red (R), azure (A), maroon (W), magenta (M). For each column, we fill from b ... [8732 chars truncated]
"A petri dish teems with colonies of different bacterial strains, each strain a different hue against the amber agar. The lab technician tallies how many separate colonies each strain has spawned, then records the results on a culture count chart—one column per strain, always in the same order, stacking marks upward from the baseline like a living histogram of microbial diversity."
120b: fail
See: An amber petri dish dotted with clusters of up to five different colored bacterial colonies, some compact, some scattered as lone cells.
Do: Count the separate colonies for each strain and record the tally on the chart, stacking each strain's column from the bottom to match its colony count.
Grid: The chart has one narrow column per strain in a fixed order, rising as many rows as the most prolific strain demands, with amber filling any empty space above.
We need to infer rule. From description: count separate colonies for each strain (color) and record tally on chart, stacking each strain's column from bottom to match its colony count. Chart has one narrow column per strain in fixed order, rising as many rows as the most prolific strain demands, with amber (O) filling empty space above. So output grid is a column per color (strain) in fixed order. Which order? Probably order of colors as they appear in key? maybe alphabetical? In examples, need to deduce. Example1: Input grid 10x10 with colors O, W, M, R. Output is 2 rows, 5 columns? Actually output shown: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. Colors present: O, W, M, R. Also maybe other colors not present? Output columns correspond to each strain in fixed order: maybe order is O, R, W, M, ... but there are 5 columns, maybe includes B? Let's list columns: column1 values: O, O (both O). column2: O, R. column3: O, O. column4: O, W. column5: M, M. So column order appears: O, R, ?, W, M. The third column maybe for another strain with zero colonies? Which color? Could be G? Let's see training examples to infer. Example2 output 3 rows, 5 columns: X O O O O X O O O O X O A W O Columns: 1: X,X,X (all X). 2: O,O,O (all O). 3: O,O,A. 4: O,O,W. 5: O,O,O. Colors present in input: O, X, A, W. Also maybe others like B, G, etc not present. Output columns correspond to maybe order: X, O, A, W, ? (maybe R?). But column5 all O (maybe placeholder for missing strain). Hmm. Example3 output 5 rows,5 columns: O O A O O O O A W O O O A W O O O A W O X R A W M Columns: 1: O,O,O,O,X. 2: O,O,O,O,R. 3: A,A,A,A,A. 4: O,W,W,W,W. 5: O,O,O,O,M. Colors present: O, A, W, X, R, M. That's six colors. Output has 5 columns, so one missing? Actually columns correspond to maybe order: O, ?, A, W, ?. Let's map: column3 is A (all A). column4 is W (mostly W). column5 is M (bottom M). column1 is O except bottom X. column2 is O except bottom R. So column1 and 2 are for O? Wait O appears many times. But they split O into two columns? Maybe each column corresponds to a specific color, but they stack counts from bottom: each column shows the color of the strain at each row representing count? Actually description: "stacking each strain's column from the bottom to match its colony count." So each column is a single color, filled from bottom up with that color for as many rows as the number of colonies of that strain. Empty spaces above filled with amber (O). So output grid should have each column filled with its color for number of colonies, else O. Thus each column's cells are either its strain color (at bottom rows) or O above. In example3, column3 is all A, meaning number of A colonies equals number of rows (5). So there are 5 A colonies. Column4 all W => 5 W colonies. Column5 bottom M only one? Actually column5 rows: O,O,O,O,M (top O). So only bottom row M, meaning 1 M colony. Column1: bottom X, rest O => 1 X colony. Column2: bottom R, rest O => 1 R colony. So co ... [8935 chars truncated]
"An astronomer scans an amber nebula where stars of five spectral classes have formed scattered clusters. She counts how many distinct clusters each spectral class has produced, then plots a luminosity chart—one column per class in the standard sequence, each column's brightness rising from the baseline like stacked photons."
120b: fail
See: An amber nebula with scattered star clusters in up to five spectral classes.
Do: Count the distinct clusters per spectral class and fill each class's column upward from the baseline to that count.
Grid: A five-column luminosity chart against an amber void, each column rising from the bottom by the cluster count of its spectral class.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids larger, output smaller 5 columns? In example1 output is 2 rows, 5 columns. Input 10x10. Output seems to be a column chart: each column corresponds to a spectral class (color). The description: count distinct clusters per spectral class and fill each class's column upward from baseline to that count. So we need to count clusters of each color (maybe non-background) in input, then produce a column of that height (count) using that color? Let's examine. Example1 input colors: O, M, W, R. Output grid 2 rows x5 columns: columns correspond to? Output shows columns: first column O, second O, third O, fourth O, fifth M in first row. Second row: O R O W M. So columns: col1: O,O ; col2: O,R ; col3: O,O ; col4: O,W ; col5: M,M. Thus each column is filled from bottom up with the color representing that class, count equals number of clusters? Let's compute clusters per color in example1. We need to identify clusters: contiguous cells? Likely orthogonal adjacency (4-direction). Let's count clusters of each non-background? What is background? Maybe O (orange) is background? In description "amber void" maybe O is background. In example1, O appears many places, likely background. Other colors: M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Count clusters of each. Let's quickly approximate. Input example1 grid 10x10. Let's locate M cells: rows1-4 etc. Row1: O O O O O O O O W W (no M). Row2: O O M O O O O O W W (one M at (2,3)). Row3: O M M M O O O W O O (M cluster of three horizontally plus one above? Actually positions (3,2),(3,3),(3,4) plus (2,3) above connects, so they form one cluster). Row4: O O M O O O W O O O (M at (4,3) connects to above cluster). So all M cells are connected as one cluster. So M cluster count =1. W cells: positions (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10),(3,8),(4,7?) Wait row3 col8 is W, row4 col7 is W. Also row6? Actually rows5-6 are all O. Row7: R O R O O O O M O O (no W). Row8: O R O O O O M M M O (no W). Row9: R O R O O O O M O O (no W). Row10 all O. So W cells: (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10) form a 2x2 block cluster =1 cluster. Also (3,8) isolated? Adjacent to (4,7) diagonally not orthogonal. (4,7) is W. Are they connected orthogonally? (3,8) adjacent to (4,8) which is O, (3,7) O, (2,8) O, (3,9) O. So isolated single cell cluster. (4,7) adjacent to (3,7) O, (5,7) O, (4,6) O, (4,8) O. So isolated. So total W clusters = 3? Wait also maybe (1,9)-(2,9) vertical adjacency, etc they are part of same cluster. So cluster count: big 2x2 block =1, plus two isolated =2 => total 3 clusters. R cells: positions rows7-9 etc. Let's list: Row7: R at col1, col3. Row8: R at col2. Row9: R at col1, col3. Also maybe others? That's it. Need to see connectivity: Are they orthogonally connected? Let's map coordinates (row, col). (7,1) adjacent to (8,1) O, (7,2) O, (6,1) O. So isolated. (7,3) adjacent to (8,3) O, (7,2) O, (7,4) O, (6,3) O. Isolated. (8,2) adjacent to (7,2) O, (9,2) O, (8,1) O, (8,3) O. Isolated. ( ... [9985 chars truncated]
"A harbor master surveys an amber sea where flotillas of five flag colors sail in scattered formations. She counts how many separate formations each fleet has deployed, then updates the port registry—one mooring column per fleet flag in a fixed dock order, each column filling from the waterline upward by as many berths as that fleet has formations."
120b: fail
See: An amber sea with scattered flotilla formations flying up to five different flag colors.
Do: Count each fleet's separate formations and fill their mooring column from the waterline upward to that count.
Grid: A five-column port registry on an amber sea, each column filled from the bottom to a height matching the fleet's formation count.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids larger (10x10?) and output smaller (maybe 2x5 etc). Example1 input 10x10, output 2x5. Example2 output 3x5. Example3 output 5x5? Actually output 5 rows, 5 columns. Observation: The description: "amber sea with scattered flotilla formations flying up to five different flag colors. Count each fleet's separate formations and fill their mooring column from the waterline upward to that count. Grid details: A five-column port registry on an amber sea, each column filled from the bottom to a height matching the fleet's formation count." Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells (non-O maybe) representing fleets? O is amber sea (background). Need to count separate formations (connected components?) of each color (up to five colors). Then output a 5-column grid where each column corresponds to a color? Fill from bottom upward to height equal to count of formations of that color. Output shows those colors in column? Let's test. Example1: Input colors present: W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Also O background. Output is 2 rows, 5 columns: rows: "O O O O M" and "O R O W M". Let's map columns: maybe order of colors sorted by something? Let's count formations of each color in input. We need to compute connected components (orthogonal adjacency?) of each color. Let's quickly approximate. Example1 grid 10x10. Let's list positions of W: appears in top rows? Input lines: Row1: O O O O O O O O W W (positions (1,9),(1,10)) Row2: O O M O O O O O W W (2,9),(2,10) Row3: O M M M O O O W O O (3,8) Row4: O O M O O O W O O O (4,7) Rows5-6 all O. Row7: R O R O O O O M O O (7,1 R, 7,3 R, 7,8 M) Row8: O R O O O O M M M O (8,2 R, 8,7-9 M) Row9: R O R O O O O M O O (9,1 R,9,3 R,9,8 M) Row10 all O. Now count connected components for each color using orthogonal adjacency. W cells: positions (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10),(3,8),(4,7). Are they all connected? Let's see adjacency: (1,9) adjacent to (1,10) and (2,9). (2,9) adjacent to (2,10) and (3,9) (which is O) and (1,9). (3,8) is adjacent to (2,8) O, (4,8) O, (3,7) O, (3,9) O. Not adjacent to others. (4,7) adjacent to (3,7) O, (5,7) O, (4,6) O, (4,8) O. So (3,8) and (4,7) are isolated separate components. So total W components: one component consisting of the 2x2 block at top right (positions (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10)) = component1. Then (3,8) component2. Then (4,7) component3. So 3 components. M cells: positions (2,3), (3,2-4), (4,3), (7,8), (8,7-9), (9,8). Let's see connectivity: Upper cluster: (2,3) adjacent to (3,3) etc. (3,2),(3,3),(3,4) connected, (4,3) also. So that's one component (upper). Lower cluster: (7,8) adjacent to (8,8) etc. (8,7),(8,8),(8,9) connected, (9,8) adjacent to (8,8). So second component. So total M components =2. R cells: positions (7,1),(7,3),(8,2),(9,1),(9,3). Let's see connectivity: (7,1) adjacent to (8,1) O, (7,2) O, (6,1) O. Not connected to others. (7,3) adjacent to (8,3) O, (7,2) O, (6,3) O, (7,4) O. (8,2) adjacent ... [9265 chars truncated]
"A technician examines an amber circuit board where five types of components are soldered in scattered clusters across the surface. She counts how many independent clusters each component type forms, then updates a diagnostic panel—one fixed LED column per component type, each column illuminating from the bottom up by as many segments as that type has clusters."
120b: fail
See: An amber circuit board with scattered clusters of up to five component types soldered across its surface.
Do: Count each component type's independent clusters and light up that many segments from the bottom of its LED column.
Grid: A five-column LED diagnostic panel on an amber background, each column lit from the base upward to the cluster count.
We need to infer rule. From description: count each component type's independent clusters and light up that many segments from bottom of its LED column. So output is a 5-column grid (since LED panel has five columns). Output shows for each color (component type) a column with that many cells lit from bottom upward, using that color? Let's examine examples. Example1 input is 10x10 grid with many colors O, M, W, R. Output is 2 rows? Actually output shown: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. So output grid size is variable? It seems output is 5 columns, rows equal to max cluster count among colors? Let's analyze. We need to count independent clusters of each component type in input. Then for each type, we create a column (maybe order predetermined) and fill from bottom up with that many cells of that color, leaving others blank? In output they show only colors present? Let's compute for Example1. First, identify colors present: O (orange), M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Need to count clusters of each. Let's map input 10x10. I'll label coordinates row1..10. I'll write grid quickly: Row1: O O O O O O O O W W Row2: O O M O O O O O W W Row3: O M M M O O O W O O Row4: O O M O O O W O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O O O Row7: R O R O O O O M O O Row8: O R O O O O M M M O Row9: R O R O O O O M O O Row10: O O O O O O O O O O Now count clusters. Color O: many cells, likely all connected? Need adjacency orthogonal? Usually clusters are orthogonal (4-direction). Let's see O cells: many, but there are gaps with other colors. Are all O cells connected? Let's see region: top left area O's contiguous across rows1-4 columns1-4 etc. Also O's in rows5-6 all O, connecting to above via adjacency (since rows5 col1 O adjacent to row4 col1 O). So whole area likely one big O cluster, except maybe isolated O's separated by other colors? There are O's in column9-10 top rows with W. Those O's maybe separate? Row1 col9 is W, col10 W. Row2 col9 W, col10 W. Row3 col9 O, col10 O. Row4 col9 W, col10 O. So O at (3,9) adjacent to (3,10) and (4,10) maybe? (4,10) O. (4,10) adjacent to (5,10) O (since row5 all O). So they connect to main O region via column10 downwards. So likely all O cells are connected as one cluster. Also O's in rows7-9 etc. So O cluster count =1. Color M: positions: (2,3), (3,2)(3,3)(3,4), (4,3), (7,8), (8,7)(8,8)(8,9), (9,8). Let's see connectivity: The top group rows2-4 columns2-4 are connected (forming a cluster). The bottom group rows7-9 columns7-9 also connected? Let's see: (7,8) adjacent to (8,8) etc. (8,7) adjacent to (8,8). (8,9) adjacent to (8,8) and (9,8). So bottom group is another cluster. Are they connected via any path through O? No, M only adjacent to M cells. So M clusters =2. Color W: positions: (1,9)(1,10)(2,9)(2,10)(3,8)(4,7)(4,9?) Actually row4 col7 W, row4 col9 W? row4 col9 is W, yes. Also row8? none. So list: (1,9)(1,10)(2,9)(2,10)(3,8)(4,7)(4,9). Are they connected? Let's see adjacency: (1,9) adjace ... [9971 chars truncated]
"An oracle gazes into an amber pool where spirits of five elemental houses have gathered in scattered covens. She counts how many separate covens each house has summoned, then inscribes the reckoning on a temple wall—one pillar per house in the sacred order, each pillar's runes climbing from the earth to mark the number of covens manifest."
120b: fail
See: An amber scrying pool with scattered covens of spirits in up to five elemental houses.
Do: Count each house's separate covens and inscribe that many runes climbing from the base of its pillar.
Grid: A five-pillar temple wall on an amber field, each pillar's runes rising from the bottom to match the coven count.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have input grids larger (10x10) and output smaller (maybe 2x5, 3x5, 5x5). The description: "five-pillar temple wall on an amber field, each pillar's runes rising from the bottom to match the coven count." So we have five pillars (columns) maybe each column corresponds to a "house" (element). Count covens (clusters) of each house (color) and then output a column of that many runes (maybe colored as the house) from bottom up? Output grid seems to have 5 columns (since pillar count 5). Indeed outputs have 5 columns each row? Example1 output: two rows, 5 columns. Example2 output: three rows, 5 columns. Example3 output: five rows, 5 columns. So number of rows equals max count among houses? Let's examine. We need to identify "houses" up to five elemental houses. Colors maybe correspond to elements: maybe red, blue, green, yellow, orange? But we have many colors: O, M, W, R, X, A, etc. In examples, which colors are considered houses? Let's examine Example1 input: many O (orange), some M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Output grid contains O, M, R, W? Output: rows: O O O O M O R O W M So output includes O, M, R, W. That's four colors. Maybe each house is a distinct color present in input (excluding background?). The background maybe is O? But O appears heavily. In description "amber field" maybe O (orange) is background. So houses are other colors: M, W, R maybe? In example1, there are three non-O colors: M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Output includes those plus O? Actually O appears in output as well. But maybe O is also a house (amber). Let's count clusters of each color (excluding O?) Let's compute clusters (connected orthogonally?) "covens" maybe connected components of same color. Let's test. Example1 input 10x10. Let's map coordinates quickly? Hard but we can approximate. We need to count separate covens per house. Then output a column of that many runes climbing from base of its pillar. So output grid: each column corresponds to a house (color). The column height equals number of covens for that house. The runes (cells) are colored with that house's color, placed from bottom up. So output grid will have rows equal to max coven count across houses, and each column will have that many colored cells at bottom, rest maybe background (maybe O?). In example1 output: 2 rows, 5 columns. So max coven count =2. Which houses? There are 5 columns (maybe fixed order). Which colors correspond to which column? Let's see output grid: Row1 (top): O O O O M Row2 (bottom): O R O W M So bottom row has colors: column1 O, col2 R, col3 O, col4 W, col5 M. Top row: column5 M again, column4 O, column2 O etc. Interpretation: For each house, we have a column of height equal to its coven count. The bottom cell is the house color; above cells maybe also same color? But in column5 we have M at both rows (both bottom and top). So M count =2 covens. Column4 has W only at bottom (since top is O). So W count =1. Colu ... [11567 chars truncated]
"A choreographer watches an amber ballroom where dancers in five troupe colors have broken into scattered circles across the floor. She counts how many separate circles each troupe has formed, then sketches the formation chart—one column per troupe in their lineup order, each column stepping upward from the floor by as many levels as that troupe has circles."
120b: fail
See: An amber ballroom floor with scattered dance circles formed by up to five color-coded troupes.
Do: Count each troupe's separate circles and step their column up from the floor by that many levels on the formation chart.
Grid: A five-column formation chart against an amber background, each column rising from the base to match the troupe's circle count.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 10x10? Actually examples show 10 rows, 10 columns. Output grids are smaller, maybe 2x5, 3x5, 5x5? Let's examine. Example1 Input 10x10. Output: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows,5 columns. Example2 Output 3 rows,5 columns: X O O O O X O O O O X O A W O Example3 Output 5 rows,5 columns: O O A O O O O A W O O O A W O O O A W O X R A W M So output always 5 columns, rows equal to number of distinct "troupes"? maybe count of circles? The metaphor: "amber ballroom floor with scattered dance circles formed by up to five color-coded troupes. Count each troupe's separate circles and step their column up from the floor by that many levels on the formation chart. Grid details: A five-column formation chart against an amber background, each column rising from the base to match the troupe's circle count." Interpretation: Input grid contains colored cells (non-O maybe). O is amber background. There are up to five colors (troupes). Need to count separate circles (connected components?) of each color. Then output a 5-column chart where each column corresponds to a color (maybe in order of appearance?) and we "step their column up from the floor by that many levels". So output grid likely has rows representing levels (height) and columns representing colors. The base (bottom row) maybe floor (row index 0). We need to place something (maybe the color code) at height equal to count of circles for that color. The output shows colors placed at certain rows. Let's analyze Example1. Input colors present: O (background), W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). That's 3 colors besides O: W, M, R. Up to five troupes, but only three present. Output is 2 rows x5 columns. But only 5 columns always? maybe columns correspond to colors in order: maybe R, W, M, etc? Let's map. Output grid: Row1: O O O O M Row2: O R O W M Columns 1-5. Let's label column indices 1-5. Column1: top O, bottom O => no color placed? column2: top O, bottom R => R placed at bottom row (row2). Column3: O,O none. Column4: O,W => W at bottom row. Column5: M,M both rows have M? Actually top M, bottom M. So M appears in both rows (two levels). That suggests count of circles for M is 2 (so placed at two levels). R count maybe 1 (placed at bottom). W count 1 (bottom). Others maybe 0. Let's verify counts in input. We need to count separate circles of each color (connected components). Define adjacency? Likely orthogonal (4-direction). Let's compute for Example1. Input grid (10x10). Let's list positions of R, W, M. I'll sketch quickly. Rows 1-10 (1-index). Provide grid: Row1: O O O O O O O O W W Row2: O O M O O O O O W W Row3: O M M M O O O W O O Row4: O O M O O O W O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O O O Row7: R O R O O O O M O O Row8: O R O O O O M M M O Row9: R O R O O O O M O O Row10: O O O O O O O O O O Now count components. Color M positions: (2,3), (3,2),(3,3),(3,4),(4,3) form a plus shape cluster? Let's see adjacenc ... [9272 chars truncated]
"A geologist examines an amber sandstone cross-section where veins of five mineral types appear in scattered deposits. She counts how many distinct deposits each mineral has formed, then draws a stratigraphic column chart—one column per mineral in the standard classification order, each column's strata building from bedrock upward by as many layers as that mineral has deposits."
120b: fail
See: An amber sandstone cross-section with scattered deposits of up to five mineral types.
Do: Count each mineral's distinct deposits and build its stratigraphic column upward from bedrock by that many layers.
Grid: A five-column stratigraphic chart on an amber field, each column rising from the base to a height matching the deposit count.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grids larger (10x10) and output smaller (maybe 2x5, 3x5, 5x5). The description: "amber sandstone cross-section with scattered deposits of up to five mineral types. Count each mineral's distinct deposits and build its stratigraphic column upward from bedrock by that many layers. Grid details: A five-column stratigraphic chart on an amber field, each column rising from the base to a height matching the deposit count." Interpretation: Input grid contains various colored cells representing mineral types (up to five types). Need to count distinct deposits (connected components?) of each mineral type. Then output a 5-column chart where each column corresponds to a mineral type? The output grid seems to have 5 columns (maybe each column corresponds to a mineral type sorted by something). Height equals count of deposits for that mineral. The output shows columns of that height stacked upward from bottom? Let's examine Example1. Example1 Input: 10x10 grid with colors O, M, W, R. Let's list mineral types present: O (orange), M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). That's 4 types, but description says up to five. Output grid is 2 rows x5 columns? Actually output shown: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. So 5 columns always? maybe columns correspond to the five possible mineral types (including maybe black '.'?), but only those present appear? In output, columns are: column1 O, column2 O, column3 O, column4 O, column5 M in first row; second row: O R O W M. So each column seems to represent a mineral type, and the cells in column are stacked bottom-up representing count of deposits. For example, column5 has M in both rows (two M's) meaning there are 2 deposits of M. Column4 has W only in second row (bottom) maybe 1 deposit of W. Column2 has R only bottom row (1 deposit of R). Column1 and 3 have O in both rows? Actually column1 top O, bottom O: two O's. Column3 top O, bottom O: two O's. So O appears in two columns? That seems odd. Maybe columns correspond to positions (x coordinate) of deposits? Wait. Let's compute distinct deposits of each color in Example1 input. We need to count connected components (maybe orthogonal adjacency). Let's map quickly. I'll sketch grid coordinates (row0 top). Input rows: 0: O O O O O O O O W W 1: O O M O O O O O W W 2: O M M M O O O W O O 3: O O M O O O W O O O 4: O O O O O O O O O O 5: O O O O O O O O O O 6: R O R O O O O M O O 7: O R O O O O M M M O 8: R O R O O O O M O O 9: O O O O O O O O O O Colors: O, M, W, R. Count components: - O: many O cells, likely all connected? Let's see if any O region separated by other colors. There are W and M and R islands. O likely forms a large background, maybe all O cells are connected (since O is the default). So O component count = 1. - M: positions: (1,2), (2,1-3), (3,2), (6,7), (7,6-8), (8,7). Are they connected? Let's see adjacency orthogonal. The cluster at top left: (1,2) adjacent to (2,2) etc. So those M cells (ro ... [10332 chars truncated]
"A chef surveys a cutting board covered in scattered piles of five different chopped ingredients against a marmalade glaze. She counts how many distinct little piles of each ingredient she's prepared, then portions them into five labeled mise en place towers—each tower rising one container for every pile, stacked from the counter up."
120b: fail
See: A marmalade-glazed cutting board strewn with separated clusters of up to five colorful chopped ingredients.
Do: Count the separate piles of each ingredient, then stack that many containers in each ingredient's designated tower, building upward from the base.
Grid: Five labeled towers side by side, each rising from the bottom, with marmalade filling the empty space above each stack.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grids larger (10x10) and output grids small (2x5? first example output 2 rows 5 columns). Example2 output 3 rows 5 columns. Interpretation: "towers side by side, each rising from the bottom, with marmalade filling the empty space above each stack." Colors: marmalade maybe orange? In description: marmalade-glazed cutting board = maybe orange O? The empty space above each stack filled with marmalade (orange). So output shows towers of each ingredient stacked upward from base, with orange filler above. We have clusters of up to five colorful chopped ingredients. Count separate piles of each ingredient, then stack that many containers in each ingredient's designated tower, building upward from the base. Thus we need to count number of separate clusters (connected components) of each color (excluding orange maybe) in input. Then output grid has columns representing each ingredient (color) maybe in order of some fixed set? The output grid shows for each ingredient a column of that color repeated count times from bottom up, with orange filler above to fill to same height? Let's examine Example1. Input Example1 grid 10x10. Let's identify colors besides O (orange) and maybe W (maroon) etc. Colors present: O, M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Also maybe others? Let's count clusters. We need to parse quickly. I'll write coordinates? Might be easier to count clusters visually. Example1 Input rows: 1: O O O O O O O O W W 2: O O M O O O O O W W 3: O M M M O O O W O O 4: O O M O O O W O O O 5: O O O O O O O O O O 6: O O O O O O O O O O 7: R O R O O O O M O O 8: O R O O O O M M M O 9: R O R O O O O M O O 10: O O O O O O O O O O We need clusters of each non-orange color: M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Let's count. First, M cells: positions: (2,3) row2 col3? Actually row2 col3 is M. Row3 col2-4 are M M M (positions (3,2),(3,3),(3,4)). Row4 col3 is M. Row7 col8 is M. Row8 col7-9 are M M M. Row9 col8 is M. So there are two separate groups? Let's see connectivity orthogonal? Usually adjacency 4-direction. Group1: top-left cluster: includes (2,3), (3,2-4), (4,3). They are all connected via adjacency. That's one cluster. Group2: bottom-right cluster: includes (7,8), (8,7-9), (9,8). Are they connected? (7,8) adjacent to (8,8) which is M (since row8 col8 is M). Row8 col7 and col9 also adjacent. Row9 col8 adjacent to (8,8). So they form one cluster. So total M clusters = 2. W cells: positions: rows1 col9-10, row2 col9-10, row3 col8, row4 col7, row7? none, row8? none, row9? none. Let's map: Row1 col9,10 are W W. Row2 col9,10 W W. Row3 col8 W. Row4 col7 W. Are these connected? Let's see adjacency: Row1 col9 adjacent to Row1 col10, Row2 col9. Row2 col9 adjacent to Row1 col9, Row2 col10, Row3 col9 (which is O), Row2 col8 (O). Row3 col8 is W adjacent to Row2 col8 O, Row4 col8 O, Row3 col7 O, Row3 col9 O. So not connected to the top cluster? Row4 col7 W adjacent to Row3 col7 O, Row5 col7 O, Row4 col6 O, Row4 co ... [10597 chars truncated]
"A sound engineer listens to a warm amber drone overlaid with bursts from five instrument families, each burst a separate phrase. She counts how many distinct phrases each family played during the piece, then builds an equalizer display—one fixed channel per family, bars rising from the floor to show how many phrases were heard."
120b: fail
See: A warm amber soundscape punctuated by scattered clusters of sound from up to five different instrument families.
Do: Tally the distinct phrases per instrument family, then raise each channel's bar accordingly from the bottom of the display.
Grid: A five-channel equalizer against an amber background, each bar rising from the baseline by the number of phrases counted for that family.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grids larger (10x10) and output small (2x5? first example output 2 rows 5 columns). Example2 output 3 rows 5 columns. So rule: count distinct phrases per instrument family? metaphor: warm amber soundscape = amber background? instrument families up to five different. Tally distinct phrases per instrument family, then raise each channel's bar accordingly from bottom of display. So output is a vertical bar chart of counts per family (color). Input contains colored cells representing instrument families? Colors: maybe O=orange (background), other colors represent families: M magenta, W maroon, R red, X grey, A azure. Need to count distinct "phrases" per family: maybe contiguous clusters? "scattered clusters of sound from up to five different instrument families." So clusters of same color (non-background) represent phrases. Count number of clusters per color (excluding background O?). Then output a bar chart with columns representing families (maybe sorted by something) and rows representing counts (bars rising from baseline). Output grid shows bars using the color of family? In example1 output: Input example1 grid 10x10. Let's analyze counts. I'll map colors: O, W, M, R. Those are families? O maybe background? In description "amber background" maybe O is amber? Actually amber could be orange (O). So O is background. So families are other colors: W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Up to five families. We need to count clusters of each family in input. Let's compute quickly. Example1 input grid lines: Row1: O O O O O O O O W W Row2: O O M O O O O O W W Row3: O M M M O O O W O O Row4: O O M O O O W O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O O O Row7: R O R O O O O M O O Row8: O R O O O O M M M O Row9: R O R O O O O M O O Row10: O O O O O O O O O O We need clusters of M, W, R. Let's locate W cells: rows1-2 columns9-10? Row1 col9 W, col10 W. Row2 col9 W, col10 W. That's a 2x2 block contiguous => one cluster. M cells: Row2 col3 M. Row3 col2-4 M M M (positions (3,2),(3,3),(3,4)). Row4 col3 M. Also Row7 col8 M. Row8 col7-9 M M M. Row9 col8 M. Need to see connectivity (adjacent orthogonal? Usually 4-direction). Let's map. Cluster1: top-left M region rows2-4 columns2-4 forms shape: (2,3), (3,2),(3,3),(3,4),(4,3). Are they all connected orthogonally? Yes they connect via adjacency. So that's one cluster. Cluster2: lower M region rows7-9 columns8? Row7 col8 M, Row8 col7-9 M M M, Row9 col8 M. These are connected forming another cluster. So total M clusters =2. R cells: Row7 col1 R, col3 R. Row8 col2 R. Row9 col1 R, col3 R. Let's see connectivity: Are they adjacent? Positions: (7,1) adjacent to (8,1) which is O, not R. (7,3) adjacent to (8,3) O. (8,2) adjacent to (7,2) O, (8,1) O, (8,3) O, (9,2) O. So each R is isolated? Also (9,1) adjacent to (8,1) O, (9,2) O. (9,3) adjacent to (8,3) O, (9,2) O, (10,3) O. So each R is separate cluster. Count R clusters =5? Let's list: (7,1), (7,3), (8, ... [10492 chars truncated]
"A referee surveys an orange clay court where five teams have left scattered huddles of players. She counts how many separate huddles each team formed, then updates the scoreboard—one column per team in a fixed lineup, each column's score climbing from the bottom like points on a ladder."
120b: fail
See: An orange clay field with scattered clusters of players in up to five team colors.
Do: Count each team's separate huddles and post the totals on the scoreboard, filling each team's column upward from the bottom.
Grid: A fixed five-column scoreboard against an orange backdrop, each column filled from the base to a height matching that team's huddle count.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger (10x10). Output grids are small (2x5, 3x5, 5x5). The description: "orange clay field with scattered clusters of players in up to five team colors. Count each team's separate huddles and post the totals on the scoreboard, filling each team's column upward from the bottom." So we have up to five team colors (maybe red, blue, green, yellow, grey?). In key, colors: R red, B blue, G green, Y yellow, X grey, M magenta, O orange, A azure, W maroon, .=black. The scoreboard is five columns against orange backdrop. Each column corresponds to a team color? The output shows columns of colors representing counts? Let's examine Example1. Input 10x10 with many O (orange) background, plus some M (magenta), W (maroon), R (red). Output is 2 rows, 5 columns: Row1: O O O O M Row2: O R O W M Interpretation: columns correspond to team colors? Let's list team colors present: R, M, W maybe? Up to five teams. Output includes colors: column1 O, column2 O, column3 O, column4 O, column5 M in top row; bottom row O R O W M. So column5 has M both rows (height 2). Column2 bottom has R. Column4 bottom has W. So counts: maybe number of separate clusters (huddles) of each color. For each team color, we count number of connected components (maybe orthogonal adjacency) of that color in input. Then we create a column of that many cells (stacked from bottom) with that team's color, placed in a fixed order (maybe alphabetical or some order). The scoreboard has five columns, each column corresponds to a team color, but there may be empty columns (filled with orange background). The output shows orange O as background for empty cells. Let's test with Example1. Input: colors present: R, M, W. Let's count clusters. We need to examine input grid (10x10). Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows. Row0: O O O O O O O O W W Row1: O O M O O O O O W W Row2: O M M M O O O W O O Row3: O O M O O O W O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O O O Row6: R O R O O O O M O O Row7: O R O O O O M M M O Row8: R O R O O O O M O O Row9: O O O O O O O O O O Now count clusters for each color. Color M (magenta): positions: (1,2), (2,1),(2,2),(2,3),(3,2) (that's a cluster). Also (6,7), (7,6),(7,7),(7,8),(8,7). Are these connected? Let's see adjacency orthogonal. The first group is at rows1-3 columns2-3 etc. The second group at rows6-8 columns7-8. They are far apart, not connected. So there are 2 separate clusters of M. Color W (maroon): positions: (0,8),(0,9),(1,8),(1,9),(2,7). Also maybe others? That's a cluster? Let's see adjacency: (0,8) adjacent to (0,9) and (1,8). (1,8) adjacent to (1,9) and (2,8?) but (2,8) is O. (2,7) is W adjacent to (1,7) O, (2,8) O, (3,7) O, (2,6) O. So (2,7) is isolated from the top-right block? Not orthogonally adjacent to (1,8) because diagonal not count. So (2,7) is separate cluster. So total W clusters: top-right block (positions (0,8),(0,9),(1,8),(1,9)) is one cluster (connected). And isolated (2,7) is ... [9043 chars truncated]
"A meteorologist studies a sunset-orange sky where storms of five different types have left scattered cloud formations. She logs how many distinct formations each storm type produced, then updates the forecast panel—one barometric column per storm type in a set order, each column's pressure bar rising from the ground to match the count of formations observed."
120b: k=3
See: A sunset-orange sky with scattered cloud formations in up to five distinct storm colors.
Do: Count the separate formations per storm type and raise each column's bar from the bottom of the forecast panel accordingly.
Grid: A five-column forecast panel on an orange field, bars rising from the base, as tall as the most prolific storm type demands.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have input grids larger (10x10) and output grids smaller (maybe 2x5, 3x5, 5x5). The description: "five-column forecast panel on an orange field, bars rising from the base, as tall as the most prolific storm type demands." So we count separate formations per storm type (color) and raise each column's bar accordingly. Likely we produce a 5-column output where each column corresponds to a color (storm type) among up to five distinct colors present in input (excluding orange maybe). Count number of separate connected components (formations) of each color. Then output a column of that height (bars) maybe using that color? The output grid shows columns of colors stacked from bottom? Let's examine Example1. Input colors: O (orange) background, plus W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). So up to three storm colors: W, M, R. Output grid is 2 rows x5 columns? Actually output shown: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. Columns: 1: O,O ; 2: O,R ; 3: O,O ; 4: O,W ;5: M,M. Interpretation: maybe each column corresponds to a storm type (color) sorted by something? But there are 5 columns fixed. The description: five-column forecast panel. So always 5 columns. Each column maybe corresponds to a specific color order: maybe order of colors in some list: R, G, B, Y, X? Not sure. Look at output: column 5 is M (magenta) both rows, column 4 has W at bottom row, column2 has R at bottom row, column1 and3 are O (orange). So bars: For each storm color, we have a vertical bar of that color of height equal to number of formations? Let's count components. In Example1 input, count separate formations of each storm color: We need to examine grid (10x10). Let's map. I'll quickly count components for M (magenta). Input lines: Row1: O O O O O O O O W W Row2: O O M O O O O O W W Row3: O M M M O O O W O O Row4: O O M O O O W O O O Rows5-6 all O. Row7: R O R O O O O M O O Row8: O R O O O O M M M O Row9: R O R O O O O M O O Row10 all O. Now find connected components (4-direction?) Usually ARC uses orthogonal adjacency. Let's locate M cells: Positions: (2,3) row2 col3 (3,2)(3,3)(3,4) (4,3) (7,8) (8,7)(8,8)(8,9) (9,8) Check connectivity: The cluster top-left: cells (2,3)-(4,3) etc are connected together (they form one component). That's component A. The cluster bottom-right: cells (7,8),(8,7-9),(9,8) are they all connected? Let's see adjacency: (7,8) adjacent to (8,8) vertically, (8,8) adjacent to (8,7) and (8,9) and (9,8). So they all connect, forming component B. So total M components = 2. Now W (maroon) cells: rows1 col9-10, row2 col9-10, row3 col8, row4 col7. Let's list: (1,9)(1,10)(2,9)(2,10)(3,8)(4,7). Are they connected? (1,9) adjacent to (1,10) and (2,9). (2,9) adjacent to (2,10) and (3,9) (which is O). (3,8) is adjacent to (2,8) O, (3,9) O, (4,8) O, (2,8) O. Not connected to others. (4,7) adjacent to (3,7) O, (4,8) O, (5,7) O. So seems there are multiple separate components: top block (1,9-10,2,9-10) is one component ( ... [9373 chars truncated]
"An urban planner surveys a terracotta plaza where buildings of five architectural styles stand in scattered clusters. She counts how many separate building clusters represent each style, then drafts a skyline elevation—one column per style in a fixed blueprint order, each column rising from the foundation by as many floors as that style has clusters."
120b: fail
See: A terracotta plaza dotted with scattered clusters of buildings in up to five architectural styles.
Do: Count the distinct clusters per style and draw each style's column upward from the foundation to that height.
Grid: A five-column elevation drawing on a terracotta background, each column built up from the base to its cluster count.
We need to infer rule. From description: "terracotta plaza dotted with scattered clusters of buildings in up to five architectural styles. Count the distinct clusters per style and draw each style's column upward from the foundation to that height. Grid details: A five-column elevation drawing on a terracotta background, each column built up from the base to its cluster count." So input grid contains various colors (O, W, M, R, X, A, etc). Need to count clusters per style (color) up to five styles? Output is a 5-column grid (maybe variable rows). In examples, output appears to be 5 columns wide. Let's examine Example1. Input 10x10. Output: O O O O M O R O W M That's 2 rows, 5 columns. Colors present in input: O (orange), W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Also maybe others? Input includes O, W, M, R. Count clusters per style? Let's compute clusters of each color (connected orthogonally? likely 4-direction). Need to count distinct clusters of each color. Then produce a column for each style (color) with height equal to cluster count, drawn upward from base (bottom). The output grid is 5 columns: maybe includes all colors that appear, sorted by some order? In example1 output columns correspond to colors? Let's map columns left to right: column1 O, column2 O, column3 O, column4 O, column5 M (top row). Bottom row: O R O W M. So column5 has M both rows (height 2). Column4 bottom has W, top O. Column2 bottom R, top O. Others O. Interpretation: For each color, we create a column of height equal to number of clusters of that color. The column is filled from bottom up with that color? But output shows column5 (M) both rows M, matches cluster count maybe 2? Let's count M clusters in input1. Input1 grid (10x10). Let's locate M cells: Row2 col3? Actually row2 (index starting 1) line: "O O M O O O O O W W" => M at (2,3). Row3: "O M M M O O O W O O" => M at (3,2),(3,3),(3,4). Row4: "O O M O O O W O O O" => M at (4,3). Row7: "R O R O O O O M O O" => M at (7,8). Row8: "O R O O O O M M M O" => M at (8,7),(8,8),(8,9). Row9: "R O R O O O O M O O" => M at (9,8). So many M cells. Need to count clusters (connected orthogonal). Let's see connectivity: The top-left group of M's (rows2-4, cols2-4) are connected forming one cluster. Then there is a separate cluster at (7,8) connected to (8,7-9) and (9,8) maybe all connected? Let's see adjacency: (7,8) adjacent to (8,8) (yes). (8,7) adjacent to (8,8). (8,9) adjacent to (8,8) and (9,8) adjacent to (8,8). So they form second cluster. So total M clusters = 2. Output column5 has height 2 (both rows M). Good. Now W clusters: Input has W at (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10),(3,8),(4,7),(4,8? actually row4 col8 O? Wait row4: "O O M O O O W O O O" => W at col7. Row5 none. Row6 none. Row7 none. Row8 none. Row9 none. Row10 none. So W cells: (1,9),(1,10),(2,9),(2,10) form a 2x2 block cluster1. Also (3,8) adjacent to (4,7)? (3,8) is row3 col8 W. (4,7) row4 col7 W. Are they orthogonally adjacent? (3,8) is above (4,8) ... [10163 chars truncated]
"A general surveys an amber desert battlefield where five armies have deployed scattered encampments. Intelligence officers count how many separate encampments each army maintains, then update the war room's threat board—one fixed column per army, each column's threat level stacking upward from the bottom like sandbags."
120b: fail
See: An amber desert with scattered encampments belonging to up to five different armies.
Do: Count each army's separate encampments and stack their threat column from the base accordingly.
Grid: A five-column threat board on an amber field, each column built from the bottom, rising to match the encampment count.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 10x10? Example1 input 10x10, output 2x5? Actually output shows 2 rows, 5 columns. Example2 output 3 rows,5 columns. Example3 output 5 rows,5 columns. So output is a 5-column board, rows equal to number of distinct "armies"? The metaphor: amber desert with scattered encampments belonging to up to five different armies. Count each army's separate encampments and stack their threat column from the base accordingly. So we have up to five different colors representing armies. Need to count separate encampments (connected components?) of each color, then produce a column of that color with height equal to count, stacked from bottom. Output grid is 5 columns (one per army) and rows equal to max count? Actually output shows columns correspond to colors present? In example1 output columns: O O O O M (first row) and O R O W M (second row). So columns: col1 O, col2 O, col3 O, col4 O, col5 M? Wait each column is vertical stack. Let's list output grid rows top to bottom: Row1: O O O O M Row2: O R O W M So column1: O,O (top O bottom O) column2: O,R column3: O,O column4: O,W column5: M,M. Thus each column corresponds to an army color? The colors present in output are O,R,W,M. That's four armies. In input example1, colors present: O (orange), W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Also maybe others? Input includes O, M, W, R. So each column corresponds to a distinct color (army). The column height equals number of separate encampments of that color. For each column, we fill from bottom up with that color? But output shows column5 (M) has both cells M (both rows). So count of M components =2. Column2 (R) has top O bottom R: top O maybe placeholder? Actually bottom cell is R (the army color), top cell O maybe filler (amber desert). Similarly column4 bottom W, top O filler. Column1 and 3 have only O (no army) meaning count zero? They have O both rows (since no component). So rule: For each of up to five armies, we create a column of height equal to max count among armies? Actually output rows = max count across armies? In example1 max count =2 (since each column height 2). So output grid has 2 rows. For armies with count less than max, the top cells are filled with O (amber desert). For armies with zero count, whole column O. Thus we need to identify up to five distinct army colors (excluding O which is desert). Which colors are considered armies? Possibly any non-O color that appears in input. Up to five distinct colors. In example2 input colors: X (grey), A (azure), W (maroon). Also O. So three armies. Output columns: X, O, A, W, O? Wait output grid 3 rows,5 columns: Rows: X O O O O X O O O O X O A W O Columns: 1: X,X,X (count 3) 2: O,O,O (zero) 3: O,O,A (count 1) 4: O,O,W (count1) 5: O,O,O (zero) So max count =3 (X components). Indeed column1 has three X's. Others have filler O. Thus we need to count connected components of each non-O color. Connectivity? Likely orthogonal (4-direction). Let's test example2 ... [11095 chars truncated]
"A stage manager peers into an amber-lit stage where actors in five costume colors have broken into scattered improvisational clusters. She counts how many separate scenes each color troupe is performing simultaneously, then updates the cue board—one spotlight column per troupe in program order, each column's intensity rising from the footlights to match the scene count."
120b: fail
See: An amber-lit stage with scattered clusters of actors in up to five costume colors performing separate scenes.
Do: Count each troupe's simultaneous scenes and raise their spotlight column from the base of the cue board to that height.
Grid: A five-column cue board against an amber wash, columns rising from the bottom to heights matching each troupe's scene count.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Example 1 input appears 10 rows, each row 10 entries. Output is 2 rows, 5 columns. So transformation reduces to 2x5 grid. Description: "five-column cue board ... columns rising from the bottom to heights matching each troupe's scene count." So we count something per column? The output shows some colors placed maybe at heights? Let's analyze example. First, list colors: O, W, M, R. Input grid 10x10 with many O (orange) background, some W (maroon) at top right region, M (magenta) cluster, R (red) cluster. We need to count each troupe's simultaneous scenes: maybe count connected components of each color? Up to five colors. Then raise their spotlight column from base to that height. So output is 2 rows (height?) maybe representing columns with heights indicated by colored cells stacked from bottom? Since output only 2 rows, maybe bottom row is base, top row is height 1? Actually height could be up to 2? In example, output has two rows: first row: O O O O M ; second row: O R O W M . Wait output given: O O O O M O R O W M So 2 rows, 5 columns. Let's map columns to colors? Maybe each column corresponds to a color (troupe). There are up to five colors present: O, W, M, R, maybe others. In example, colors present: O, W, M, R. That's four. But output has 5 columns. Maybe columns correspond to colors sorted by something, and empty column represented by O? But O is also a color (orange). Hmm. Maybe the output shows a vertical bar chart: each column height equals count of that color clusters? The base row (bottom) maybe always O? In output bottom row: O R O W M. Top row: O O O O M. So column 1: top O, bottom O => height 0? column2: top O, bottom R => maybe height 1 with R? column3: O,O => none. column4: O,W => height1 with W. column5: M,M => height2 with M? Actually both rows have M in column5, so height2 with M stacked. Thus maybe each column corresponds to a color, and the number of rows with that color equals count of something (maybe number of clusters). For column5 (M) there are two M's stacked, meaning count=2. For column2 (R) only bottom row has R, top O, count=1. For column4 (W) count=1. For column1 and 3 have no color (just O placeholder). So we have colors M,R,W each with counts 2,1,1 respectively. That matches maybe number of connected components of each color in input? Let's check. In example input, count connected components (4-direction?) of M: there is a cluster of M's? Let's view grid: rows: 1: O O O O O O O O W W 2: O O M O O O O O W W 3: O M M M O O O W O O 4: O O M O O O W O O O 5: O O O O O O O O O O 6: O O O O O O O O O O 7: R O R O O O O M O O 8: O R O O O O M M M O 9: R O R O O O O M O O 10: O O O O O O O O O O M positions: (2,3), (3,2-4), (4,3), (7,8), (8,7-9), (9,8). Are these two separate clusters? The top cluster: rows2-4 near column3 forms a plus shape connected. That's one component. The bottom cluster: rows7-9 near column8 forms another component. So to ... [10336 chars truncated]
"A gardener surveys an autumn-orange plot where five flower varieties grow in scattered patches. She counts how many separate patches each variety has colonized, then records the spread on a garden trellis—one vine column per variety in a fixed bed order, each vine climbing from the soil upward by as many rungs as that flower has patches."
120b: fail
See: An autumn-orange garden bed with scattered patches of up to five flower varieties.
Do: Count each variety's separate patches and let its vine climb from the soil up that many rungs on the trellis.
Grid: A five-column trellis on an orange background, each vine climbing from the bottom to a height matching the patch count.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger (10x10). Output grids are smaller (2x5, 3x5, 5x5). The metaphor: autumn-orange garden bed with scattered patches of up to five flower varieties. Count each variety's separate patches and let its vine climb from the soil up that many rungs on the trellis. Grid details: A five-column trellis on an orange background, each vine climbing from the bottom to a height matching the patch count. Interpretation: Input contains orange background (O) and other colors representing flower varieties (up to five). Need to count number of separate patches (connected components) of each color (excluding O). Then produce output grid: a 5-column trellis (so width 5). Height maybe equal to max count? In examples output heights vary: Example1 output 2 rows, 5 columns. Example2 output 3 rows, 5 columns. Example3 output 5 rows, 5 columns. So height equals the maximum number of patches among colors? Let's test. Example1: Input colors besides O: W (maroon), M (magenta), R (red). Let's count patches. We need to examine input grid 10x10. Let's map. I'll label coordinates row1..10, col1..10. Example1 Input rows: 1: O O O O O O O O W W 2: O O M O O O O O W W 3: O M M M O O O W O O 4: O O M O O O W O O O 5: O O O O O O O O O O 6: O O O O O O O O O O 7: R O R O O O O M O O 8: O R O O O O M M M O 9: R O R O O O O M O O 10: O O O O O O O O O O Now count patches for each non-O color. Colors: W, M, R. Define connectivity? Likely orthogonal (4-direction). Let's find patches. W cells: positions (row1,col9-10) two adjacent horizontally => same component. Row2 col9-10 also W W adjacent to row1? row2 col9 is below row1 col9, so connected => same component. Row3 col8 is W (col8). Row3 col8 adjacent to row2 col8? row2 col8 is O, not W. But row3 col8 is adjacent to row2 col8 (O) and row4 col8 O, row3 col7 O, row3 col9 O. So separate component. Row4 col7 is W (col7). Row4 col7 adjacent to row3 col7 O, row5 col7 O, row4 col6 O, row4 col8 O. So separate component. Row7? none. Row8? none. Row9? none. So total W components: component1 includes top right block (rows1-2, cols9-10) plus maybe row3 col8? Not connected. So component1 (size 4). component2 row3 col8 alone. component3 row4 col7 alone. So 3 patches of W. M cells: positions: row2 col3 (M). row3 col2-4 (M M M). row4 col3 (M). row7 col8 (M). row8 col7-9 (M M M). That's it. Let's see connectivity: The cluster at rows2-4 col2-4 likely all connected: row2 col3 adjacent to row3 col3 etc. Row3 col2-4 are contiguous. Row4 col3 connects. So that's one component (size 5). Then row7 col8 is isolated (since row6 all O, row8 col8 is M? row8 col8 is M (since row8 col7-9 are M). Actually row8 col8 is M, adjacent vertically to row7 col8, so they are connected. Also row8 col7 and col9 adjacent horizontally to row8 col8, so all three connect. So second component includes row7 col8 and row8 col7-9 (size 4). So total M patches = 2. R cells: positions: row7 col1, row7 col3, row9 col ... [10579 chars truncated]
See: The input is an 8×8 grid filled entirely with orange (O) cells except for exactly one cell that has a different color — the 'seed.' The seed can be any of the nine non-orange colors: black (.), blue (B), red (R), green (G), yellow (Y), grey (X), magenta (M), orange is excluded as it is the background, azure (A), or maroon (W).
Do: 1. Locate the single non-orange cell in the input. Record its color C and its position (r, c) using zero-indexed row and column coordinates. 2. Use the fixed 9-color cycle in this order: G, Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B (indices 0 through 8). 3. Determine the index of the seed color C within this cycle. Call it i. 4. For every cell (row, col) in the output grid, compute the Manhattan distance d = |row − r| + |col − c|. 5. Assign that cell the color at position (i + d) mod 9 in the cycle. 6. Fill the entire grid this way. The result is a diamond-shaped ripple of colors radiating outward from the seed position.
Grid: The grid is always 8×8. The input uses orange (O) as the uniform background with exactly one non-orange seed cell. The output grid has the same 8×8 dimensions but contains no orange — every cell is replaced by a color from the 9-color cycle determined by its Manhattan distance from the seed.
"A pebble dropped in a still pond sends out rings of color."
120b: k=1
See: A calm, uniform orange lake stretches across the grid — perfectly still, without a single ripple. Somewhere in this lake, a single colored pebble rests just beneath the surface, waiting to disturb the peace.
Do: The pebble drops. From the point of impact, concentric diamond-shaped waves radiate outward, each ring shifting to the next color in an endless chromatic heartbeat — a prayer wheel of nine hues spinning forever forward. The closer a spot is to where the stone fell, the younger its ripple; the farther away, the more the wave has aged and cycled through the spectrum. The particular color of the pebble determines which note the melody begins on, and every ring thereafter follows the same ancient song in order.
Grid: The once-tranquil orange lake is completely transformed — no trace of stillness remains. Every point on the water now shimmers with the color of whichever ripple has reached it, painting a diamond-shaped mandala centered on the point of impact. The lake keeps its original shores but is reborn entirely in the nine sacred colors of the wave.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: mostly O (orange) with a single '.' (black) at position (row3,col2) using 1-index? Let's map example. Example1 Input: 8x8 grid. All O except a G at (1,7?) Let's see: Input lines: Row1: O O O O O O G O (col7 G) Rows2-8 all O. Output 8x8 with many colors. Looks like a diamond pattern centered at the G? The description: lake orange, pebble colored determines start note. In example, pebble is G (green). So center is G. Then concentric diamond rings with colors cycling through nine hues in order. Need order of colors: given color key includes 9 colors? list: . black, B blue, R red, G green, Y yellow, X grey, M magenta, O orange, A azure, W maroon. That's 10 actually. But description says nine hues. Maybe black is not part of cycle? In output we see colors: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, etc. So cycle includes W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M? Let's see order from center outward. Find center at (1,7) where input G. Output at same position? Output row1 col7 is G? Row1: W A R X . Y G Y => col7 = G indeed. So center retains G (starting color). Then ring distance 1 (Manhattan distance) should be next color in cycle. Let's compute positions with Manhattan distance 1 from (1,7): (1,6), (1,8), (0,7 invalid), (2,7). Output values: (1,6)=Y, (1,8)=Y, (2,7)=? Row2: M W A R X . Y . => col7 = Y. So distance1 color = Y. So after G comes Y. Distance2 positions: Manhattan distance 2 diamond. Let's list some: (1,5), (1,9 invalid), (2,6), (2,8), (3,7). Output values: (1,5)=. ; (2,6)=. ; (2,8)=. ; (3,7)=? Row3: B M W A R X . X => col7 = . . So distance2 color = . (black). So after Y comes . . Distance3: positions distance3: (1,4), (2,5), (3,6), (4,7), (3,8), (2,9 invalid), (5,7) etc. Let's check some: (1,4)=X, (2,5)=X, (3,6)=X, (4,7)=? Row4: G B M W A R X R => col7 = X. So distance3 color = X (grey). So after . comes X. Distance4: color? positions distance4: (1,3)=R, (2,4)=R, (3,5)=R, (4,6)=R, (5,7)=? Row5: Y G B M W A R A => col7 = R. So distance4 color = R (red). So after X comes R. Distance5: color? (1,2)=A, (2,3)=A, (3,4)=A, (4,5)=A, (5,6)=A, (6,7)=? Row6: . Y G B M W A W => col7 = A. So distance5 color = A (azure). After R comes A. Distance6: color? (1,1)=W, (2,2)=W, (3,3)=W, (4,4)=W, (5,5)=W, (6,6)=W, (7,7)=? Row7: X . Y G B M W M => col7 = W. So distance6 color = W (maroon). After A comes W. Distance7: color? (2,1)=M, (3,2)=M, (4,3)=M, (5,4)=M, (6,5)=M, (7,6)=M, (8,7)=? Row8: R X . Y G B M B => col7 = M. So distance7 color = M (magenta). After W comes M. Distance8: color? (3,1)=B, (4,2)=B, (5,3)=B, (6,4)=B, (7,5)=B, (8,6)=B, (9,7 invalid). Row8 col6 = B. So distance8 color = B (blue). After M comes B. Distance9: color? (4,1)=G, (5,2)=G, (6,3)=G, (7,4)=G, (8,5)=G. Row8 col5 = G. So distance9 color = G again? That would complete cycle of 9 colors: starting G, then Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B, then back to G. That's 9 steps? Let's count: G (0), Y (1), . (2), X (3), R (4), A (5), W (6), M (7), B (8) then repeats G (9). T ... [3855 chars truncated]
"A single mutant cell in dormant tissue triggers a cascade of differentiation, each generation of daughter cells expressing the next phenotype in a fixed developmental program."
120b: fail
See: A uniform field of quiescent tissue with one aberrant cell expressing a distinct marker.
Do: The mutation radiates outward in diamond-shaped wavefronts; each successive ring of cells activates the next gene in a looping expression cassette, coloring the entire organism.
Grid: An 8×8 tissue sample. The quiescent background is replaced entirely by the differentiation spectrum emanating from the mutant cell.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8 with mostly O (orange) except one '.' (black) at position (row3,col2) using 1-index? Let's map example. Example1 input: 8x8 all O except one '.' at (row1? let's see). Input lines: Row1: O O O O O O G O Row2: O O O O O O O O Row3: O O O O O O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O Row7: O O O O O O O O Row8: O O O O O O O O Only G at (1,7) and '.' at? Actually row1 col7 is G. No '.'? Wait description says one aberrant cell expressing distinct marker. In example input there is a G (green) at (1,7). That's the distinct marker. So the "aberrant cell" is G, not '.'. Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors forming diamond rings around that G? Let's examine output grid. Output rows: 1: W A R X . Y G Y 2: M W A R X . Y . 3: B M W A R X . X 4: G B M W A R X R 5: Y G B M W A R A 6: . Y G B M W A W 7: X . Y G B M W M 8: R X . Y G B M B We see a diagonal pattern of colors forming a cycle: sequence maybe W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ... then repeats? Let's list the sequence order around the center G at (1,7). Actually output shows G at (1,7) same as input. Surrounding cells have other colors. Observe pattern: It seems like a repeating 8-color cycle: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, (maybe then back to W). Indeed row1: positions 1-8: W A R X . Y G Y (note last is Y not W). Hmm. Let's map coordinates relative to the G at (1,7). Compute Manhattan distance (diamond). For each cell, the color seems determined by distance modulo 8 maybe. Let's compute distances from G (row1,col7). For each cell (r,c), d = |r-1| + |c-7|. Now list some cells: Cell (1,7) distance 0 => G (green). Good. Cell (1,6) distance 1 => '.' (black) according to output row1 col6 is '.' yes. Cell (1,5) distance 2 => Y (yellow) row1 col5 is Y. Good. Cell (1,4) distance 3 => X (grey) row1 col4 X. Good. Cell (1,3) distance 4 => R (red) row1 col3 R. Good. Cell (1,2) distance 5 => A (azure) row1 col2 A. Good. Cell (1,1) distance 6 => W (maroon) row1 col1 W. Good. Cell (2,7) distance 1 => '.'? Output row2 col7 is Y? Wait row2 col7 is Y (looking row2: M W A R X . Y .) columns: 1 M,2 W,3 A,4 R,5 X,6 .,7 Y,8 . . So (2,7) distance = |2-1|+|7-7|=1 => should be '.' but it's Y. Hmm maybe orientation different: The pattern seems rotated? Let's compute (2,6) distance 2? (2,6) output is '.' at col6. That's distance |2-1|+|6-7|=2. But output '.' not Y. So maybe the pattern is not based on Manhattan distance from G but from the '.' cell? Wait there is also a '.' at (1,6) and (2,6) etc. Actually there are multiple '.' in output forming a diagonal line. Let's examine pattern more: It looks like a diagonal line of '.' from (1,6), (2,6), (3,7?), (4,8?), etc. Let's list positions of '.' in output: Row1 col5? Actually row1 col5 is '.'? Wait row1 col5 is '.'? Row1: W A R X . Y G Y => col5 '.' yes. Row2 col6 '.'. Row3 col7 '.'. Row4 col8 R? row4 col8 is R not '.'. Row5 col1 Y? not. Row6 col1 '.'? row6: . Y G B M W A W ... [9471 chars truncated]
"A newborn star ignites in a dark nebula, and shells of ionized gas expand outward — each successive shell glows with the next emission line in a cycling elemental spectrum."
120b: k=1
See: A uniform nebular cloud with one bright stellar ignition point.
Do: Ionization shells expand in diamond-shaped fronts from the star; each shell emits the next color in a nine-element spectral cycle, illuminating the entire nebula.
Grid: 8×8 nebula. The uniform cloud is entirely replaced by the expanding emission shells centered on the newborn star.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 grid all O except one G at (0,6?) Let's map coordinates: rows 0-7, columns 0-7. Input example first row: O O O O O O G O => G at column6 row0. Rest all O. Output is 8x8 with many colors forming diamond shells centered at that G? Let's examine output pattern. Output first row: W A R X . Y G Y. So at column6 row0 (same position) output is G (same as input). Surrounding pattern seems like a diamond of colors expanding outward. Colors cycle through nine-element spectral cycle: sequence maybe: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M? Wait need to see order from center outward. Center G. Next shell (Manhattan distance 1) should be Y? Let's check positions distance1 from (0,6): (0,5) column5 row0 output '.'? Actually row0 col5 is '.' (black). That's distance1. (0,7) col7 row0 output Y. (1,6) row1 col6 output '.'? Row1: M W A R X . Y . => col6 is Y? Wait row1 col0 M,1 W,2 A,3 R,4 X,5 .,6 Y,7 . So (1,6) is Y. So distance1 cells have colors: left '.' (black), right Y, down Y, up none (out of bounds). Not uniform. Maybe the pattern is a rotating cycle along diamond shells but also shifted due to orientation? Let's compute Manhattan distance from center (0,6). For each cell, output color seems to follow a sequence based on distance modulo 9 maybe, but also offset by direction? Let's list distances and colors. Create grid coordinates. I'll write output matrix with coordinates. Row0: col0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y Row1: col0 M,1 W,2 A,3 R,4 X,5 .,6 Y,7 . Row2: col0 B,1 M,2 W,3 A,4 R,5 X,6 .,7 X Row3: col0 G,1 B,2 M,3 W,4 A,5 R,6 X,7 R Row4: col0 Y,1 G,2 B,3 M,4 W,5 A,6 R,7 A Row5: col0 .,1 Y,2 G,3 B,4 M,5 W,6 A,7 W Row6: col0 X,1 .,2 Y,3 G,4 B,5 M,6 W,7 M Row7: col0 R,1 X,2 .,3 Y,4 G,5 B,6 M,7 B Now compute Manhattan distance d = |r-0|+|c-6|. Let's compute for each cell and see color mapping. I'll create list: Row0: c0: d=|0|+|0-6|=6 => W c1: d=5 => A c2: d=4 => R c3: d=3 => X c4: d=2 => . (black) c5: d=1 => Y c6: d=0 => G c7: d=1 => Y Row1: c0: d=|1|+|0-6|=1+6=7 => M c1: d=6 => W c2: d=5 => A c3: d=4 => R c4: d=3 => X c5: d=2 => . c6: d=1 => Y c7: d=2? |1|+|7-6|=1+1=2 => . (output .) yes. Row2: c0: d=|2|+6=8 => B c1: d=7 => M c2: d=6 => W c3: d=5 => A c4: d=4 => R c5: d=3 => X c6: d=2 => . (output .) matches c7: d=3? |2|+|7-6|=2+1=3 => X (output X) matches. Row3: c0: d=|3|+6=9 => G c1: d=8 => B c2: d=7 => M c3: d=6 => W c4: d=5 => A c5: d=4 => R c6: d=3 => X c7: d=4? |3|+|7-6|=3+1=4 => R (output R) matches. Row4: c0: d=|4|+6=10 => Y c1: d=9 => G c2: d=8 => B c3: d=7 => M c4: d=6 => W c5: d=5 => A c6: d=4 => R c7: d=5? |4|+1=5 => A (output A) matches. Row5: c0: d=|5|+6=11 => . c1: d=10 => Y c2: d=9 => G c3: d=8 => B c4: d=7 => M c5: d=6 => W c6: d=5 => A c7: d=6? |5|+1=6 => W (output W) matches. Row6: c0: d=|6|+6=12 => X c1: d=11 => . c2: d=10 => Y c3: d=9 =& ... [5038 chars truncated]
"A colored buoy dropped into a becalmed sea sends out diamond-shaped swells, each crest refracting into the next shade in a cycling nautical palette."
120b: k=1
See: A calm, featureless sea with one colored buoy placed at a specific position.
Do: Swells radiate from the buoy in diamond-shaped crests; each successive crest shifts to the next color in a nine-hue maritime cycle, painting the entire sea.
Grid: 8×8 sea surface. The calm water is entirely replaced by the chromatic swell pattern radiating from the buoy.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 grid with mostly O (orange) except one G at (row1? Let's index rows 0-7, columns 0-7). Input example shows first row: O O O O O O G O (so G at column6 row0). All other cells O. Output is 8x8 with pattern of colors forming diamond radiating from that G location? Let's examine output grid. I'll write coordinates. Output rows: 0: W A R X . Y G Y 1: M W A R X . Y . 2: B M W A R X . X 3: G B M W A R X R 4: Y G B M W A R A 5: . Y G B M W A W 6: X . Y G B M W M 7: R X . Y G B M B We see a diagonal pattern of colors shifting. The central G appears at row3 col0? Wait output row3 col0 is G. That's leftmost column. But input G was at row0 col6. So output seems rotated? Let's map colors: The sequence of colors appears to be a cycle of 9 hues: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M then repeats? Let's list order from output: Starting at (0,0) W, then (0,1) A, (0,2) R, (0,3) X, (0,4) ., (0,5) Y, (0,6) G, (0,7) Y (but Y repeats). Hmm maybe pattern is diamond centered at original G location, with Manhattan distance determining color offset. Let's compute Manhattan distance from original G (row0,col6). For each cell, distance d = |r-0|+|c-6|. Then assign color based on d modulo 9? Let's test: For cell (0,0): d=6. Color at (0,0) is W. Need mapping: d=0 would be original G? At (0,6) output is G (yes). So distance 0 -> G. Good. Distance 1 cells: (0,5) and (1,6). Output at (0,5) is Y. At (1,6) is Y. So distance1 -> Y. Distance2 cells: (0,4) (1,5) (2,6). Output (0,4) is . ; (1,5) is . ; (2,6) is . . So distance2 -> . (black). Distance3: (0,3) (1,4) (2,5) (3,6). Output (0,3) X ; (1,4) X ; (2,5) X ; (3,6) X. So distance3 -> X (grey). Distance4: (0,2) (1,3) (2,4) (3,5) (4,6). Output (0,2) R ; (1,3) R ; (2,4) R ; (3,5) R ; (4,6) R. So distance4 -> R (red). Distance5: (0,1) (1,2) (2,3) (3,4) (4,5) (5,6). Output (0,1) A ; (1,2) A ; (2,3) A ; (3,4) A ; (4,5) A ; (5,6) A. So distance5 -> A (azure). Distance6: (0,0) (1,1) (2,2) (3,3) (4,4) (5,5) (6,6). Output (0,0) W ; (1,1) W ; (2,2) W ; (3,3) W ; (4,4) W ; (5,5) W ; (6,6) W. So distance6 -> W (maroon). Distance7: (1,0) (2,1) (3,2) (4,3) (5,4) (6,5) (7,6). Output (1,0) M ; (2,1) M ; (3,2) M ; (4,3) M ; (5,4) M ; (6,5) M ; (7,6) M. So distance7 -> M (magenta). Distance8: (2,0) (3,1) (4,2) (5,3) (6,4) (7,5). Output (2,0) B ; (3,1) B ; (4,2) B ; (5,3) B ; (6,4) B ; (7,5) B. So distance8 -> B (blue). Distance9: (3,0) (4,1) (5,2) (6,3) (7,4). Output (3,0) G ; (4,1) G ; (5,2) G ; (6,3) G ; (7,4) G. That's G again? Wait distance9 -> G again (cycle length 9). Indeed after 9 steps returns to G. Distance10: (4,0) (5,1) (6,2) (7,3). Output (4,0) Y ; (5,1) Y ; (6,2) Y ; (7,3) Y. So distance10 -> Y (same as distance1). So cycle of 9 colors: order starting at distance0 G, then 1 Y, 2 ., 3 X, 4 R, 5 A, 6 W, 7 M, 8 B, 9 G again, etc. Thus rule: Find the unique non-O cell (the buoy) which is a color (maybe any). Then replace entire grid with pattern based on Manhattan distanc ... [5187 chars truncated]
"A single charged node on a blank circuit board sends voltage rippling outward — each successive diamond-shaped equipotential line glows with the next color in a cycling LED sequence."
120b: k=1
See: A dormant circuit board with one energized node at a specific position, glowing a particular color.
Do: Voltage propagates outward in diamond-shaped equipotential rings; each ring lights up as the next color in a nine-LED cycle, energizing the entire board.
Grid: 8×8 circuit board. The dormant surface is entirely replaced by the voltage ripple pattern radiating from the charged node.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8 all O except one '.' at (row3,col2?) Let's index rows 1-8, columns 1-8. Input example: they gave training example 1 input all O except a '.' at row3 col2? Let's map: lines: Row1: O O O O O O G O (note a G at col7) Row2: O O O O O O O O Row3: O O O O O O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O Row7: O O O O O O O O Row8: O O O O O O O O So there is a G at (1,7). Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors. Looks like a diamond propagation from that G? Let's examine output grid rows: Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B We see a pattern of colors cycling: sequence maybe W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ... then repeats? Let's list the diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Actually look at row4 col1 = G (original G). So original G at (1,7) becomes at output row4 col1? Wait original G at (1,7) input. Output row4 col1 is G. That's a shift? Let's compute Manhattan distance from original G? Original position (1,7). In output, the pattern seems centered maybe at (4,4)? Let's see output row4 col4 = W? Actually row4 col4 = W? Row4: G B M W A R X R. So col4 = W. Row4 col4 is center? Let's compute distances: The pattern appears to be a diamond of colors radiating outward from a central point (maybe the '.' in test). In training, the source is G at (1,7). The output shows a diamond pattern with colors cycling through a 9-color sequence: maybe order: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M then repeats? Let's check: Starting at center maybe '.'? In output, there are '.' at positions: row1 col5, row2 col6, row3 col7, row4 col8, row5 col1, row6 col2, row7 col3, row8 col4. That's a diagonal from (1,5) to (8,4) descending left? That's a line of '.' forming a diagonal. That seems like the original '.'? Wait original input had a G not '.'. But output has '.' forming a diagonal line. The pattern seems like each diagonal (southwest-northeast) is a constant color, shifting each step. Let's examine pattern: Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B Observe that each row is shifted version of previous row to the right by 1 (circular?) Let's compare row1 to row2: row2 is row1 shifted right by 1 with wrap? Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Shift right by 1 gives: Y W A R X . Y G (not match). Not that. Maybe pattern is based on Manhattan distance from original G (source). Let's compute Manhattan distance from (1,7) to each cell. For cell (1,7) distance 0. Output at (1,7) is G (makes sense). Distance 1 cells: (1,6),(1,8),(2,7). Output at (1,6) = Y, (1,8)=Y, (2,7)=Y. So distance1 color = Y. Distance2 cells: positions with Manhattan distance 2: (1,5),(2,6),(2,8),(3,7). Output: (1,5)=., (2,6)=., (2,8)=., (3,7)=. So distance2 color = '.' (black). Distance3: (1,4),(2,5),(3,6 ... [5879 chars truncated]
"A god plants a rune-stone in the void, and divine energy pulses outward in diamond-shaped auras — each aura ring manifests the next sigil color in a cycling pantheon of nine powers."
120b: k=1
See: A formless void with one rune-stone placed at a specific location, glowing with a divine color.
Do: Power radiates outward in diamond-shaped auras; each aura ring manifests the next color in a nine-power divine cycle, filling the entire void with sacred light.
Grid: 8×8 void. The emptiness is entirely replaced by the divine aura pattern radiating from the rune-stone.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8 with mostly O (orange) except one '.' (black) at position (row3,col2) using 1-index? Let's map coordinates. Example 1: Input is 8x8 all O except one G at (1,7?) Wait example input shows first row: O O O O O O G O (so G at row1 col7). Output is a pattern of many colors forming diamond rings around that G? Let's examine output grid 8x8. Write coordinates (r,c). Output row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B We see pattern of 8 colors: sequence maybe W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ? Actually the cycle described: nine-power divine cycle. Colors list maybe: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M? Let's see order around center. The original G at (1,7) is input. In output, at (1,7) we have G (same). So the source remains same color? The pattern seems to be a diagonal? Let's locate the '.' in output: there are many '.' positions: (1,5), (2,6), (3,7), (4,8), (5,1), (6,2), (7,3), (8,4). That's a diagonal from (5,1) to (1,5) etc. That's a line of '.' forming a diagonal (southwest-northeast). This looks like a diamond pattern centered maybe at some point? Let's compute Manhattan distance from some center. The pattern seems to be a repeating sequence along diagonals. Observe that each row seems to be a shift of previous row to right by 1 (cyclic). Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B Indeed each row is previous row shifted right by 1 (with wrap?). Let's test: Row1 shift right gives . W A R X . Y G? Not matching. Actually Row2 is Row1 shifted left? Row1: W A R X . Y G Y If we shift left by 1 (drop first, append at end) we get A R X . Y G Y W. Not Row2. Shift right by 1 (prepend last) gives Y W A R X . Y G. Not Row2. So maybe each row is previous row shifted but also colors cycle. Let's examine columns: Column1: W, M, B, G, Y, ., X, R. That's a sequence of 8 distinct colors (including .). Column2: A, W, M, B, G, Y, ., X. That's same sequence shifted down. So pattern is a diagonal shift. Thus the grid is a toroidal pattern of a 8-element cycle: [W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ?] Wait we have 8 elements: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ? The missing is maybe B or M? Let's list column1 sequence: W, M, B, G, Y, ., X, R. That's 8 distinct: W, M, B, G, Y, ., X, R. Column2: A, W, M, B, G, Y, ., X. That's same set but shifted. So the cycle order (starting at row1 col1) goes: W -> M -> B -> G -> Y -> . -> X -> R -> (back to W). That's 8-step cycle. Now where does A and other colors appear? Row1 col2 is A, which is not in that column1 cycle. So maybe there are two interleaved cycles? Let's examine full 8x8 pattern maybe it's a 8x8 Latin square of order 8 using 8 symbols (including .). Indeed each row is a cyclic shift of the previous row by one to the right (or left). Let's te ... [8024 chars truncated]
"A lone dancer stamps the floor and rhythmic energy ripples outward in diamond-shaped waves — each ring of dancers who feel the pulse strikes the next pose in a nine-move cycling choreography, each pose a different color."
120b: k=1
See: A still dance floor with one performer at a specific position, costumed in a distinctive color.
Do: The rhythm spreads in diamond-shaped waves from the dancer; each wave triggers the next color-coded pose in a nine-move loop, until the entire floor is alive with movement.
Grid: 8×8 dance floor. The stillness is entirely replaced by the choreographic wave pattern radiating from the lead dancer.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 all O except one? Let's examine example1 input: first row: O O O O O O G O (so a G at position (0,6) zero-index). Rest all O. Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors. Looks like a diamond wave from that G location, using a 9-color cycle: maybe sequence: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, Y? Wait output first row: W A R X . Y G Y. That's 8 cells. Starting from leftmost column? Let's map coordinates. Input G at (0,6). Output at same location? Output row0 col6 is G (yes). So original G stays G? Actually output row0 col6 = G matches input. The pattern seems to be a diagonal? Let's write output grid coordinates. I'll index rows 0-7, cols 0-7. Output rows: 0: col0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y 1: M W A R X . Y . 2: B M W A R X . X 3: G B M W A R X R 4: Y G B M W A R A 5: . Y G B M W A W 6: X . Y G B M W M 7: R X . Y G B M B We see a pattern of a 8x8 toroidal? Looks like each diagonal (southwest to northeast) has same sequence shifted. The sequence along a diagonal maybe: W A R X . Y G ?. Let's check diagonal starting at (0,0) down-right: (0,0) W, (1,1) W? Actually (1,1) is W? row1 col1 = W yes. (2,2) = W? row2 col2 = W yes. (3,3)=W? row3 col3 = W yes. So main diagonal all W. Good. Next diagonal offset +1 (col = row+1): (0,1) A, (1,2) A, (2,3) A, (3,4) A, (4,5) A, (5,6) A, (6,7) M? Wait row6 col7 = M, not A. Hmm maybe pattern wraps after reaching edge? Let's compute: row5 col6 = A (yes). row6 col7 = M (should be A if continuation). So maybe pattern cycles after 7 steps? Let's examine other diagonals. It seems pattern is based on Manhattan distance from the source G at (0,6). Let's compute distances: For each cell, distance = |r-0|+|c-6|. Then assign colors based on distance modulo something (9?). Let's test: distance 0 at (0,6) => G (color G). distance 1 cells: (0,5) Y, (1,6) Y? output (0,5)=Y yes, (1,6)=Y yes. distance2: cells (0,4)=., (1,5)=., (2,6)=., (1,7)=., (2,5)=X? Wait (2,5) = X, (0,4)=., (1,5)=., (2,6)=., (1,7)=., (2,5)=X, (0,3)=X? Actually (0,3)=X distance 3? Let's compute: (0,3) distance = |0|+|3-6|=3. So not distance2. So distance2 cells are (0,4) distance2 => output '.' yes. (1,5) distance2 => '.' yes. (2,6) distance2 => '.' yes. (1,7) distance2 => '.' yes. So distance2 maps to '.' (black). Good. Distance3 cells: (0,3) X, (1,4) X, (2,5) X, (3,6) X, (2,7) X, (3,5) R? Wait (3,5) is R distance = |3|+|5-6|=3+1=4 not 3. So distance3 mapping to X (grey). Output shows X at those positions: (0,3) X, (1,4) X, (2,5) X, (3,6) X, (2,7) X, (3,5)?? Actually (3,5) is R not X, but distance 4. So okay. Distance4 cells: (0,2) R, (1,3) R, (2,4) R, (3,5) R, (4,6) R, (3,7) R, (4,5) W? Wait (4,5) distance = |4|+|5-6|=4+1=5 not 4. So distance4 mapping to R (red). Output shows R at those positions: (0,2) R, (1,3) R, (2,4) R, (3,5) R, (4,6) R, (3,7) R, (5,? ) etc. Good. Distance5 cells: (0,1) A, (1,2) A, (2,3) A, (3,4) A, (4,5) A? Actually (4,5) distance =5? |4|+|5-6|=4+1=5 yes output row4 col5 = A. (5,6) A? row5 ... [7021 chars truncated]
"A single crystal nucleus forms in cooling magma, and mineral bands crystallize outward in diamond-shaped growth rings — each ring precipitates the next mineral in a nine-phase cycling sequence."
120b: k=1
See: A uniform magma field with one crystal seed formed at a specific point, showing a particular mineral color.
Do: Crystallization radiates outward in diamond-shaped growth bands; each band precipitates the next mineral color in a nine-phase cycle, solidifying the entire magma chamber.
Grid: 8×8 magma chamber. The molten uniformity is entirely replaced by the crystallization pattern radiating from the seed crystal.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 all O except one G at (0,6?) Let's map coordinates. Input example grid rows: Row0: O O O O O O G O (col6 G) Rows1-7 all O. Output is 8x8 with pattern of colors forming diamond bands radiating from seed. The seed G appears at same position? Output row0 col6 is G? Let's see output row0: "W A R X . Y G Y". Columns:0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y. Yes G at col6 matches seed. So seed stays same color? The pattern uses cycle of nine colors: sequence maybe W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ?, ?. Let's list order around seed outward. The output shows a diamond pattern: center G, then surrounding positions have next colors in cycle outward. We need to determine the nine-phase cycle order. Looking at output, we can map Manhattan distance from seed (0,6). Compute distances. Coordinates (r,c). Seed at (0,6). Distance d = |r-0|+|c-6|. Let's list output values with distances. Row0: c0 d=6 -> W c1 d=5 -> A c2 d=4 -> R c3 d=3 -> X c4 d=2 -> . c5 d=1 -> Y c6 d=0 -> G c7 d=1 -> Y Row1: "M W A R X . Y ." c0 d=7 -> M c1 d=6 -> W c2 d=5 -> A c3 d=4 -> R c4 d=3 -> X c5 d=2 -> . c6 d=1 -> Y c7 d=2? distance |1-0|+|7-6|=2 -> . (output .) yes. Row2: "B M W A R X . X" c0 d=8 -> B c1 d=7 -> M c2 d=6 -> W c3 d=5 -> A c4 d=4 -> R c5 d=3 -> X c6 d=2 -> . c7 d=3 -> X Row3: "G B M W A R X R" c0 d=9 -> G c1 d=8 -> B c2 d=7 -> M c3 d=6 -> W c4 d=5 -> A c5 d=4 -> R c6 d=3 -> X c7 d=4? |3-0|+|7-6|=4 -> R Row4: "Y G B M W A R A" c0 d=10 -> Y c1 d=9 -> G c2 d=8 -> B c3 d=7 -> M c4 d=6 -> W c5 d=5 -> A c6 d=4 -> R c7 d=5 -> A Row5: ". Y G B M W A W" c0 d=11 -> . c1 d=10 -> Y c2 d=9 -> G c3 d=8 -> B c4 d=7 -> M c5 d=6 -> W c6 d=5 -> A c7 d=6 -> W Row6: "X . Y G B M W M" c0 d=12 -> X c1 d=11 -> . c2 d=10 -> Y c3 d=9 -> G c4 d=8 -> B c5 d=7 -> M c6 d=6 -> W c7 d=7 -> M Row7: "R X . Y G B M B" c0 d=13 -> R c1 d=12 -> X c2 d=11 -> . c3 d=10 -> Y c4 d=9 -> G c5 d=8 -> B c6 d=7 -> M c7 d=8 -> B We see pattern repeats every 9 distances? Let's list colors by distance d (starting d=0): d0 G, d1 Y, d2 ., d3 X, d4 R, d5 A, d6 W, d7 M, d8 B, d9 G again? At d9 we have G (row3 col0, row4 col1, row6 col3, row7 col4). Yes G repeats at distance 9. So cycle length 9: [G, Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B] then repeats. Thus rule: given a single seed of some color (maybe any) in otherwise uniform background, fill entire grid with colors based on Manhattan distance from seed, using a fixed 9-color cycle starting with seed's color at distance 0, then next colors in order: Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B, then repeat. But note seed color in example is G. The next color Y is present at distance1. So the order after G is Y. So the cycle is predetermined independent of seed? Possibly the cycle is fixed sequence of colors: G, Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B. If seed were different color, maybe start at that ... [3561 chars truncated]
"A single spice dropped onto a warm flatbread melts outward, each concentric ring of heat unlocking the next flavor in a rotating spice rack."
120b: fail
See: A plain flatbread with one dot of spice placed somewhere on its surface.
Do: Heat carries the essence outward in diamond-shaped waves; each ring away from the source cycles through a fixed sequence of seasonings, transforming the entire bread.
Grid: 8×8 flatbread. The plain dough disappears entirely, replaced by bands of flavor radiating from where the spice was dropped.
We need to infer rule. Input is 8x8 with mostly O (orange) and a single '.' (black) at some position (row3 col2? Let's index from 1). Example1 input: all O except a '.' at row1? Wait given input grid lines: first line "O O O O O O G O". Actually there is a G (green) at position (1,7). No '.' there. Let's examine: Input example1 has a G at (1,7). No '.'? Actually there is no '.' in input example1. The description says plain flatbread with one dot of spice. But example input shows a G maybe representing the dot? The color key: '.' = black. So dot is black. But example input has a G (green) not '.' . Hmm maybe the dot is G? Let's examine output: output has '.' at some positions forming diamond pattern? Output grid shows many colors including '.' at some positions. Let's map. Example1 Input grid 8x8: Row1: O O O O O O G O Row2: O O O O O O O O Row3: O O O O O O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O Row7: O O O O O O O O Row8: O O O O O O O O Only non-O is G at (1,7). So the "dot of spice" is G? But description says dot of spice placed somewhere. Could be any color other than O? In test input, there is a '.' at (3,2). So dot is '.' (black). So the source can be any non-O? Let's see output pattern: Output grid shows many colors: W A R X . Y G Y etc. Looks like a cyclic pattern radiating outward from source location (the G). The pattern includes a sequence of colors: maybe order: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ... That's 8 colors? Let's list sequence as appears moving outward in diamond rings. Look at output grid coordinates relative to source (1,7). Let's compute distances (Manhattan? Diamond shape suggests Manhattan distance). For each cell, compute Manhattan distance d = |r - rs| + |c - cs|. Then assign color based on d modulo something (maybe 8). Let's test. Source at (1,7) (row1 col7). Output at that cell should be maybe the source color? In output row1 col7 is G? Let's check output row1: "W A R X . Y G Y". So col7 is G indeed. So source retains its original color G. Good. Now look at cells with distance 1 (Manhattan distance 1). Those are (1,6), (1,8), (2,7). Output values: row1 col6 = Y, row1 col8 = Y, row2 col7 = X? Wait row2 line: "M W A R X . Y ." So row2 col7 = Y? Let's parse row2: columns: 1 M,2 W,3 A,4 R,5 X,6 .,7 Y,8 . . Actually row2 col6 is '.' (dot), col7 Y, col8 . . So distance1 cells: (1,6) Y, (1,8) Y, (2,7) Y. So all Y. So distance1 => Y. Distance2 cells: positions with Manhattan distance 2 from source. Let's list: (1,5), (1,9 out of bounds), (2,6), (2,8), (3,7). Within board: (1,5) col5 row1 = '.'? Row1 col5 is '.'? Row1: "W A R X . Y G Y": col1 W,2 A,3 R,4 X,5 .,6 Y,7 G,8 Y. So (1,5) = '.' . (2,6) row2 col6 = '.' . (2,8) row2 col8 = '.' . (3,7) row3 col7 = X? Row3 line: "B M W A R X . X". col7 = '.'? Wait row3: B M W A R X . X => col1 B,2 M,3 W,4 A,5 R,6 X,7 .,8 X. So (3,7) = '.' . So distance2 => '.' (black). Good. Distance3 cells: (1,4), (2,5), (3,6), (4,7), (2,9 out), (3,8), (4,6), (5,7) etc ... [7486 chars truncated]
"A single note struck on a dulcimer resonates outward, each overtone ringing the next pitch in a nine-tone scale that wraps around endlessly."
120b: k=2
See: A silent instrument grid with one string plucked at a particular position.
Do: The vibration spreads in diamond-shaped wavefronts from the struck point; each successive wavefront sounds the next note in a cycling scale, filling every position with tone.
Grid: 8×8 soundboard. Silence is entirely replaced by the resonating pattern of pitches spreading from the plucked string.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8 with mostly O (orange) and a single special cell: in example1 input has a G at (0,6?) Let's map coordinates row0 col0 etc. Example1 Input: row0: O O O O O O G O (so G at (0,6)). All other O. Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors. Looks like a diamond wave from that G location, using a cycle of colors: maybe sequence W A R X . Y G ... Let's list the cycle observed in output: Starting at the G location? Output row0 col6 is G (same as input). Surrounding cells have other colors. Let's write output grid coordinates. I'll index rows 0-7, cols 0-7. Row0: W A R X . Y G Y col0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y Row1: M W A R X . Y . Row2: B M W A R X . X Row3: G B M W A R X R Row4: Y G B M W A R A Row5: . Y G B M W A W Row6: X . Y G B M W M Row7: R X . Y G B M B We see a pattern of diagonal lines? Looks like a repeating sequence along rows/cols: The pattern seems to be a 8-cycle: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ? then repeats? Let's see row0: W A R X . Y G Y (ends Y not back to W). Row1 starts M then W A R X . Y . So after G maybe next is M? Indeed row0 col7 is Y, row1 col0 is M. So the sequence maybe length 8: W A R X . Y G M? Let's check order along a diagonal? Let's list the sequence as we move right then down (south-east) maybe. Take diagonal from (0,0) W, (1,1) W? Actually (1,1) is W? Row1 col1 = W yes. (2,2) = W? Row2 col2 = W yes. So diagonal constant W. So pattern is based on Manhattan distance from source? Let's compute distance from source (0,6). Manhattan distance d = |r-0|+|c-6|. Let's compute some cells: Source (0,6) distance 0 => output G (matches source color G). Distance 1 cells: (0,5) Y, (0,7) Y, (1,6) Y, (-1,6) none. So distance1 => Y. Distance2 cells: (0,4) ., (0,8) none, (1,5) ., (1,7) ., (2,6) ., ( - )? Actually output at (0,4) is ., (1,5) is ., (1,7) is ., (2,6) is . . So distance2 => . (black). Distance3: (0,3) X, (1,4) X, (2,5) X, (3,6) X, (2,7) X? output (2,7) X yes. So distance3 => X (grey). Distance4: (0,2) R, (1,3) R, (2,4) R, (3,5) R, (4,6) R, (3,7) R, (4,5) A? Wait (4,5) is A? Row4 col5 = A yes. That's distance? (4,5) distance = |4-0|+|5-6|=4+1=5 not 4. So distance4 => R (red). Good. Distance5: (0,1) A, (1,2) A, (2,3) A, (3,4) A, (4,3) B? Wait (4,3) row4 col3 = M? Actually row4 col3 = M? Row4: Y G B M W A R A, col0 Y,1 G,2 B,3 M,4 W,5 A,6 R,7 A. So (4,3) = M. That's distance = |4|+|3-6|=4+3=7 not 5. Let's compute distance5 cells: positions where |r|+|c-6|=5. For r=0, c=1 (dist5) => A matches. r=1, c=0 (dist=1+6=7) not. r=1,c=2 (dist=1+4=5) => output row1 col2 = A matches. r=2,c=1 (dist=2+5=7) not. r=2,c=3 (dist=2+3=5) => row2 col3 = A matches. r=3,c=2 (dist=3+4=7) not. r=3,c=4 (dist=3+2=5) => row3 col4 = A matches. r=4,c=5 (dist=4+1=5) => row4 col5 = A matches. r=5,c=6 (dist=5+0=5) => row5 col6 = A matches. r=6,c=7 (dist=6+1=7) not. So distance5 => A (azure). Good. Distance6: (0,0) W, (1,1) W, (2,2) W, (3,3) W, (4,4) W, (5,5) W, (6,6) W, (7,7) B? Wait (7 ... [7689 chars truncated]
"A star player steps onto a featureless practice field and their influence radiates outward — each concentric zone of the field adopts the next color in the team's rotating jersey sequence."
120b: fail
See: A blank training pitch with one athlete standing at a specific spot, wearing a distinctive color.
Do: Influence spreads in diamond-shaped zones from the player; each zone farther out dons the next jersey in a cycling palette, until the entire field is claimed.
Grid: 8×8 pitch. The blank surface is completely overtaken by the radiating team colors centered on the player's position.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8 with mostly O (orange) and a single '.' (black) at position (row3,col2) using 1-index? Let's map coordinates. Example 1: Input grid 8x8 all O except a G at (1,7?) Wait example 1 input shows first row: O O O O O O G O (so G at row1 col7). Output shows pattern of colors radiating from that G? Let's examine output grid 8x8. Output row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B We see a diamond pattern centered at the G location? Let's locate G in output: there are multiple Gs. In output row4 col1 is G, row5 col2 G, row6 col3 G, row7 col4 G, row8 col5 G. That's a diagonal line. Also original G at input row1 col7 maybe becomes something else? In output row1 col7 is G (yes). So original G stays G? Actually output row1 col7 is G, matches input G location. So the pattern seems to be a diamond (Manhattan distance) from that G, with colors cycling outward. Let's list colors sequence: Starting at center (distance 0) = G? Actually center is G. Distance 1 cells (Manhattan distance 1) are maybe A? Let's check cells adjacent to (1,7): positions (1,6), (1,8), (2,7). Output values: (1,6) = '.' (black). (1,8) = Y. (2,7) = Y. Hmm not uniform. Maybe the pattern is a repeating 8-color cycle along diagonals? Let's compute Manhattan distance from some reference point maybe (4,4) center? Let's examine pattern: It looks like a repeating sequence along anti-diagonals: The output appears to be a shifted version of a base pattern. Observe that each row seems to be previous row shifted right by 1 with wrap? Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B Indeed each row is previous row shifted right by 1 (circular?) Let's test: Row1 shift right 1 gives last element Y becomes first? Row1 shifted right: Y W A R X . Y G (not matching Row2). Actually Row2 is M W A R X . Y . Not same. Maybe shift left? Row1 shifted left gives A R X . Y G Y W (not Row2). So not simple shift. But pattern seems to be a diagonal band of each color moving down-right. Let's map coordinates with colors: Create matrix with coordinates (r,c). Write color. r1: c1 W, c2 A, c3 R, c4 X, c5 ., c6 Y, c7 G, c8 Y r2: c1 M, c2 W, c3 A, c4 R, c5 X, c6 ., c7 Y, c8 . r3: c1 B, c2 M, c3 W, c4 A, c5 R, c6 X, c7 ., c8 X r4: c1 G, c2 B, c3 M, c4 W, c5 A, c6 R, c7 X, c8 R r5: c1 Y, c2 G, c3 B, c4 M, c5 W, c6 A, c7 R, c8 A r6: c1 ., c2 Y, c3 G, c4 B, c5 M, c6 W, c7 A, c8 W r7: c1 X, c2 ., c3 Y, c4 G, c5 B, c6 M, c7 W, c8 M r8: c1 R, c2 X, c3 ., c4 Y, c5 G, c6 B, c7 M, c8 B We see a repeating sequence of 8 colors: maybe order: G, A, R, X, ., Y, ?, etc. Let's list the cycle as we move southeast (down+right). Starting at (1,7) G. Move down+1, right+1 => (2,8) . (output row2 col8 is .). That's '.' after G. Next (3,9) out of ... [8720 chars truncated]
"A single lightning strike on a calm plain sends prismatic shockwaves rippling outward, each ring of atmosphere refracting into the next hue of a cycling spectrum."
120b: k=1
See: A featureless atmospheric plain with one point of electrical discharge.
Do: The shockwave expands in diamond-shaped fronts from the strike point; each front refracts into the next color of a nine-hue loop, painting the entire sky.
Grid: 8×8 sky. The uniform atmosphere is entirely replaced by the prismatic shockwave pattern radiating from the lightning strike.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 8x8. In example, input is mostly O (orange) except one '.' at (row3,col2?) Let's index rows 1-8, columns 1-8. Input example: rows: 1: O O O O O O G O (note a G at col7) 2: all O 3: all O 4: all O 5: all O 6: all O 7: all O 8: all O So there is a G (green) at (1,7). Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors forming diamond pattern radiating from that point? Let's examine output grid rows: Row1: W A R X . Y G Y Row2: M W A R X . Y . Row3: B M W A R X . X Row4: G B M W A R X R Row5: Y G B M W A R A Row6: . Y G B M W A W Row7: X . Y G B M W M Row8: R X . Y G B M B We see pattern of 9 colors loop: sequence maybe: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M then repeats? Let's list order as appears moving outward from the source? The source is G at (1,7) in input. In output at same position (row1,col7) is G (same). So source retains its color? Actually output row1 col7 = G matches input G. Good. Now pattern seems to be diamond (Manhattan distance) from source, each distance gets next color in loop. Let's compute Manhattan distance from source (1,7). For each cell, distance d = |r-1|+|c-7|. Then assign color based on (d mod 9) maybe starting with 0 -> G? Let's test. We need to map colors to distances. At distance 0 (source) color G. Check cell (1,6) distance 1: output row1 col6 = Y. So distance1 -> Y. Distance2: (1,5) output row1 col5 = . (black). So distance2 -> . Distance3: (1,4) output X. So distance3 -> X. Distance4: (1,3) output R. So distance4 -> R. Distance5: (1,2) output A. So distance5 -> A. Distance6: (1,1) output W. So distance6 -> W. Distance7: (2,7) distance1? Actually (2,7) distance = |2-1|+|7-7|=1 => should be Y. Output row2 col7 = Y correct. Distance8: (2,6) distance2 => . output row2 col6 = . correct. Distance9: (2,5) distance3 => X output row2 col5 = X correct. Distance10: (2,4) distance4 => R output row2 col4 = R correct. Distance11: (2,3) distance5 => A output row2 col3 = A correct. Distance12: (2,2) distance6 => W output row2 col2 = W correct. Distance13: (2,1) distance7 => M? Wait output row2 col1 = M. According to sequence after W should be M? Let's see earlier sequence: after W we had M at distance7? Let's list colors by distance from source based on observed: d0 G d1 Y d2 . d3 X d4 R d5 A d6 W d7 M d8 B? Check (3,1) distance = |3-1|+|1-7|=2+6=8? Actually 8. Output row3 col1 = B. So distance8 -> B matches. d9? (3,2) distance = |3-1|+|2-7|=2+5=7? Wait that's 7. Output row3 col2 = M (distance7). Good. d9 (3,3) distance = |3-1|+|3-7|=2+4=6 => W? Output row3 col3 = W correct. d10 (3,4) distance =5 => A? Output row3 col4 = A correct. d11 (3,5) distance=4 => R output row3 col5 = R correct. d12 (3,6) distance=3 => X output row3 col6 = X correct. d13 (3,7) distance=2 => . output row3 col7 = . correct. d14 (3,8) distance=|3-1|+|8-7|=2+1=3 => X output row3 col8 = X correct. Thus pattern is Manhattan distance from source, mapping to a ... [5891 chars truncated]
"A cornerstone is laid in an empty plaza, and mosaic tiles spiral outward from it — each successive diamond ring of pavement uses the next tile color in the architect's repeating palette."
120b: k=2
See: A bare plaza floor with one colored cornerstone set at a specific location.
Do: Tiles are laid outward from the cornerstone in diamond-shaped rings, each ring cycling to the next color in a fixed nine-color palette, until the entire plaza is paved.
Grid: 8×8 plaza. No bare ground remains; every tile reflects the radiating mosaic pattern from the cornerstone.
We need to infer rule. From description: "bare plaza floor with one colored cornerstone set at a specific location." Input has a single non-O cell (maybe '.' or 'X' etc) representing cornerstone. In example1 input: all O except maybe something? Let's examine example1 input grid: 8x8 all O? Actually first row: O O O O O O G O -> there is a G at position (0,6) (0-index). So cornerstone is G at (row0,col6). Output shows pattern of diamond rings outward from that point, cycling through nine-color palette. The palette order appears: maybe sequence: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ?, etc. Let's list output first row: W A R X . Y G Y. That's 8 cells. The cornerstone G appears at column6 (0-index) in output row0 col6? Indeed output row0 col6 is G. So cornerstone remains same color? In input G at (0,6). Output has G at same location. Surrounding cells follow pattern outward. We need to deduce palette order and how rings are assigned. Palette of nine colors: from key: . (black), B, R, G, Y, X, M, O, A, W? Actually O is orange but used as background maybe not part of palette. In output we see colors: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M. That's 9 distinct colors: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, B, M. Yes nine colors. So palette order likely: W -> A -> R -> X -> . -> Y -> G -> B -> M -> (back to W). That's the cycle. Now rings: distance measured in Manhattan? Diamond shape (Manhattan distance). The cornerstone is distance 0 (ring0) color G (the cornerstone's original color). Wait G is part of palette at position 6 in cycle. So maybe the cornerstone's color determines offset in cycle. The rings outward get next colors in cycle after cornerstone's color? Let's test. In example1, cornerstone G at distance0. The cells at distance1 (Manhattan distance 1) should be next color after G in cycle: after G comes B (since order ... Y, G, B, M, W...). But output shows at positions adjacent to G? Let's locate G at (0,6). Adjacent cells: (0,5) output '.'? Actually row0 col5 is '.' (black). That's not B. (0,7) output Y. (1,6) output X? Row1 col6 is X. ( -1,6) out of bounds. So not consistent. Maybe the cycle starts at W at top-left corner? Let's examine pattern: Output appears to be a repeating diamond pattern centered at G but rotated? Let's compute Manhattan distance from G (0,6). For each cell, compute distance d. Then assign color = palette[(index_of_G + d) mod 9]? Let's test for (0,5) distance 1. Palette order we need to know index of G. Let's assign order as list: W(0), A(1), R(2), X(3), .(4), Y(5), G(6), B(7), M(8). Index of G =6. Then color for d=1 would be palette[(6+1)%9]=palette[7]=B. But output at (0,5) is '.' not B. So not. Maybe the order is reversed? Let's try order starting with G then B then M then W then A then R then X then . then Y then G? Not. Let's examine more cells to deduce mapping. Let's compute distances and colors from output. I'll map coordinates (r,c). G at (0,6) color G. List some cells: (0,0) W distance = |0-0|+|0-6|=6. Output W. So di ... [7652 chars truncated]
"A signal flare fired from a position in no-man's land sends out expanding diamond-shaped blast rings, each ring scorching the earth a different color as it cycles through a munitions spectrum."
120b: k=1
See: A barren battlefield with one flare burning at a specific coordinate.
Do: The blast expands outward in diamond wavefronts from the flare; each ring chars the ground to the next color in a cycling sequence, consuming the entire field.
Grid: 8×8 battlefield. The barren ground is entirely replaced by the scorched-earth pattern radiating from the flare's position.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 all O except maybe something? Let's examine example 1 input: first row: O O O O O O G O (so a G at (0,6) zero-index?). Rest rows all O. Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors. Looks like a diamond pattern centered at that G? Let's map coordinates. Use row, col indices 0-7. Input G at row0 col6. Output at same position? Output row0 col6 is G? Let's see output row0: "W A R X . Y G Y". Columns:0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y. Yes G at (0,6) matches input G. So the flare is the G cell. The rest of grid transformed into pattern radiating outward in diamond (Manhattan distance) with colors cycling through sequence? Sequence appears: maybe order: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ... but need to see pattern. Let's compute Manhattan distance d from the source (0,6). At distance 0: G (source). At distance 1: cells (0,5),(1,6),(0,7)?? also (-1,6) out of bounds. Output at (0,5) is Y. (0,7) is Y. (1,6) is X? Wait row1 col6 in output row1: "M W A R X . Y ." columns:0 M,1 W,2 A,3 R,4 X,5 .,6 Y,7 . So (1,6) is Y. So distance1 cells are Y. So color for distance1 = Y. Distance2: cells with Manhattan distance 2: (0,4),(1,5),(2,6),(1,7),(0,8 out), etc. Output (0,4) is . ; (1,5) is . ; (2,6) row2 col6: row2 "B M W A R X . X": col6 is . ; (1,7) row1 col7 is . . So distance2 color = . (black). Good. Distance3: cells distance3: (0,3),(1,4),(2,5),(3,6),(2,7),(1,8 out),(0,9 out). Output (0,3) X ; (1,4) X ; (2,5) X ; (3,6) X? row3 "G B M W A R X R": col6 X yes. So distance3 color = X (grey). Distance4: distance4 cells: (0,2),(1,3),(2,4),(3,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8),(1,9),(0,10). Output (0,2) R ; (1,3) R ; (2,4) R ; (3,5) R ; (4,6) R? row4 "Y G B M W A R A": col6 R yes. So distance4 color = R (red). Distance5: distance5 cells: (0,1),(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5),(5,6),(4,7),(3,8)... Output (0,1) A ; (1,2) A ; (2,3) A ; (3,4) A ; (4,5) A ; (5,6) A? row5 ". Y G B M W A W": col6 A yes. So distance5 color = A (azure). Distance6: distance6 cells: (0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6),(5,7),(4,8)... Output (0,0) W ; (1,1) W ; (2,2) W ; (3,3) W ; (4,4) W ; (5,5) W ; (6,6) W? row6 "X . Y G B M W M": col6 W yes. So distance6 color = W (maroon). Distance7: distance7 cells: (1,0),(2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,4),(6,5),(7,6),(6,7),(5,8)... Output (1,0) M ; (2,1) M ; (3,2) M ; (4,3) M ; (5,4) M ; (6,5) M ; (7,6) M? row7 "R X . Y G B M B": col6 M yes. So distance7 color = M (magenta). Distance8: cells: (2,0),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(6,4),(7,5),(8,6)... Output (2,0) B ; (3,1) B ; (4,2) B ; (5,3) B ; (6,4) B ; (7,5) B. So distance8 color = B (blue). Distance9: cells: (3,0),(4,1),(5,2),(6,3),(7,4) etc. Output (3,0) G ; (4,1) G ; (5,2) G ; (6,3) G ; (7,4) G. So distance9 color = G (green). Wait G appears again, same as source color? The sequence cycles after 9? Let's see distance10: cells (4,0),(5,1),(6,2),(7,3) output (4,0) Y ; (5,1) Y ; (6,2) Y ; (7,3) Y. So distance10 color = Y again (same as distance1). So cycle length 9? Actually sequence from distance0: G (source). ... [6721 chars truncated]
"A single spotlight ignites on a dark stage, and colored gels cascade outward in diamond-shaped halos — each successive ring of light shifts to the next filter in a rotating gel wheel."
120b: k=1
See: A dim, uniform stage with one spotlight activated at a particular position, showing a specific color.
Do: The light cascades outward in diamond halos; each halo shifts to the next gel in a nine-filter wheel, until the entire stage is bathed in cycling color.
Grid: 8×8 stage. The uniform dimness is completely replaced by the cascading spotlight pattern from the single source.
We need to infer rule. Input example: 8x8 all O except one cell? Let's examine example 1 input: first row: O O O O O O G O (so a G at position (0,6) zero-index). Rest all O. Output is 8x8 with many colors forming pattern. Looks like a diamond propagation from that source, cycling through a sequence of colors: W A R X . Y G ... etc. The sequence maybe a 9-color wheel: W, A, R, X, ., Y, G, ?, maybe M, B? Let's list output rows. I'll write coordinates. Output grid rows: Row0: W A R X . Y G Y Row1: M W A R X . Y . Row2: B M W A R X . X Row3: G B M W A R X R Row4: Y G B M W A R A Row5: . Y G B M W A W Row6: X . Y G B M W M Row7: R X . Y G B M B We see pattern of diagonals? Looks like each row is shifted version of previous. The sequence of colors along a diagonal maybe cycles. Let's map positions relative to source at (0,6). The output at that position (0,6) is G. Indeed source G becomes G? In input source was G. Output at same location is G. Good. Now surrounding cells: The pattern seems like a diamond (Manhattan distance) with colors shifting outward. At distance 1 (Manhattan) from source, we have maybe Y at (0,5) and Y at (1,6) and ? At (0,7) is Y? Actually row0 col7 is Y. So three Y's around? Let's check: row0 col5 = Y, col6 = G, col7 = Y. Row1 col6 = Y? Row1 col6 = Y. Yes row1 col6 = Y. So distance1 cells are Y. Distance2 cells have X? Let's see (0,4) is . (dot). That's distance2 left. (0,8) out of bounds. (1,5) is .? Row1 col5 = . yes. (1,7) = .? Row1 col7 = . . (2,6) = .? Row2 col6 = . yes. So distance2 cells are '.' (black). Distance3 cells have R? Let's check (0,3) = X? Actually row0 col3 = X (distance3). Wait maybe sequence: distance0 G, distance1 Y, distance2 ., distance3 X, distance4 R, distance5 A, distance6 W, distance7 M, distance8 B, distance9 ? maybe loops. Check (0,3) distance3 from source (col diff 3). Output X. Good. (0,2) distance4 => R? Row0 col2 = R yes. (0,1) distance5 => A? Row0 col1 = A yes. (0,0) distance6 => W? Row0 col0 = W yes. So moving leftwards from source, we see sequence: G, Y, ., X, R, A, W, M? Actually continue: row1 col0 = M (distance? source at (0,6). Row1 col0 diff row+col = 1+6=7 distance7 => M matches. Row2 col0 distance8 => B matches row2 col0 B. Row3 col0 distance9 => G? Row3 col0 = G matches cycle back to G? Indeed after B maybe back to G. So sequence length 9: G, Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B then repeats G. Thus rule: For each cell, compute Manhattan distance d from the source cell (the unique non-O cell in input). Then assign color based on d modulo 9 mapping to sequence starting with source color at d=0, then next colors in wheel: after source color G, the next is Y, then ., then X, then R, then A, then W, then M, then B, then back to G. But note the wheel is fixed order independent of source color? In example source is G, and sequence follows a fixed order: G -> Y -> . -> X -> R -> A -> W -> M -> B -> G. This seems like a predetermined 9-color cycle. If so ... [3495 chars truncated]
"A single enchanted seed planted in fallow soil sends roots outward in diamond-shaped rings, each ring blooming into the next flower color in nature's rotating calendar."
120b: k=2
See: A plot of bare soil with one colored seed planted at a specific spot.
Do: Growth radiates from the seed in diamond-shaped rings; each ring blooms into the next color in a nine-flower cycle, until every inch of the garden is in flower.
Grid: 8×8 garden plot. The bare soil vanishes entirely, replaced by the blooming pattern radiating from the planted seed.
We need to infer rule. Input grids 8x8 with mostly O (orange) and a single different cell: Example1 input has a G at (0,6?) Let's map coordinates row0 col0 etc. Example1 Input grid: rows: 0: O O O O O O G O 1: O ... all O ... All O except row0 col6 = G. Output is an 8x8 pattern with many colors, seems like diamond rings radiating from that seed. The seed color G appears in output at same position? Let's check output row0 col6 = G? Output row0: "W A R X . Y G Y". Columns:0 W,1 A,2 R,3 X,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 Y. Yes G at (0,6) matches seed. So seed remains same color. The pattern seems to be a 9-color cycle: maybe order: . (black), Y, G, B, M, W, A, R, X? Let's see sequence outward. At seed (distance0) G. At distance1 (Manhattan distance?) diamond shape. Let's compute positions distance1 from (0,6): (0,5),(0,7),(1,6). Output values: (0,5)=Y, (0,7)=Y, (1,6)=. Wait (1,6) row1 col6 = .? Row1: "M W A R X . Y ." columns:0 M,1 W,2 A,3 R,4 X,5 .,6 Y,7 . . Actually row1 col6 = Y, col5 = . So (1,6) Y. So distance1 cells are Y (maybe same color). So ring1 is Y. Distance2 cells: positions with Manhattan distance 2: (0,4),(0,8 out), (1,5),(1,7),(2,6). Output: (0,4)=., (1,5)=., (1,7)=., (2,6)=. Row2: "B M W A R X . X" col6 = . yes. So ring2 is . (black). Distance3: (0,3),(1,4),(2,5),(3,6),(2,7),(1,8 out),(0,9 out) etc. Output values: (0,3)=X, (1,4)=X, (2,5)=X, (3,6)=X? Row3: "G B M W A R X R" col6 = X yes. So ring3 is X (grey). Distance4: (0,2),(1,3),(2,4),(3,5),(4,6),(3,7),(2,8...), etc. Output: (0,2)=R, (1,3)=R, (2,4)=R, (3,5)=R, (4,6)=R? Row4: "Y G B M W A R A" col6 = R yes. So ring4 is R (red). Distance5: (0,1),(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5),(5,6),(4,7),(3,8...), etc. Output: (0,1)=A, (1,2)=A, (2,3)=A, (3,4)=A, (4,5)=A, (5,6)=A? Row5: ". Y G B M W A W" col6 = A yes. So ring5 is A (azure). Distance6: (0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6),(5,7),(4,8...), etc. Output: (0,0)=W, (1,1)=W, (2,2)=W, (3,3)=W, (4,4)=W, (5,5)=W, (6,6)=W? Row6: "X . Y G B M W M" col6 = W yes. So ring6 is W (maroon). Distance7: (1,0),(2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,4),(6,5),(7,6),(6,7),(5,8...), etc. Output: (1,0)=M, (2,1)=M, (3,2)=M, (4,3)=M, (5,4)=M, (6,5)=M, (7,6)=M? Row7: "R X . Y G B M B" col6 = M yes. So ring7 is M (magenta). Distance8: (2,0),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(6,4),(7,5),(6,6?) already used, etc. Output: (2,0)=B, (3,1)=B, (4,2)=B, (5,3)=B, (6,4)=B, (7,5)=B. So ring8 is B (blue). Distance9: (3,0),(4,1),(5,2),(6,3),(7,4) output: (3,0)=G, (4,1)=G, (5,2)=G, (6,3)=G, (7,4)=G. So ring9 is G again? Wait cycle repeats after 9? Starting seed G distance0, then Y, ., X, R, A, W, M, B, G, then continues? In example grid size 8, max distance from seed (0,6) to opposite corner (7,0) is 13? Actually Manhattan distance from (0,6) to (7,0) =13. But we only see up to distance9 maybe because beyond grid? Let's check (7,0) output row7 col0 = R? Row7: "R X . Y G B M B" col0 = R which corresponds to distance? (7,0) distance =13. Let's compute cycle length 9. Starting at distance0 G (index0). distance1 Y (1), 2 . (2),3 ... [6567 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains exactly two 'center' pixels — one blue (B) and one red (R) — placed on a black background. Scattered around the grid are 'satellite' pixels: orange (O) pixels that share a row or column with the blue center, and green (G) pixels that share a row or column with the red center. Each satellite is aligned with its center in one of the four cardinal directions (directly above, below, left, or right), separated by some distance of black cells. There may also be stray colored pixels that do not align cardinally with either center; these are noise.
Do: 1. Identify the two center pixels: blue (B) and red (R). Note their positions. 2. For each center, find its associated satellites — orange (O) for blue, green (G) for red — that lie in the same row or same column as that center (i.e., directly above, below, left, or right of it at any distance). 3. For each satellite, determine its cardinal direction relative to its center (up, down, left, or right). 4. Clear the entire grid to black. 5. Place each center pixel back at its original position. 6. Place each satellite in the cell immediately adjacent to its center in the same cardinal direction it originally occupied. That is, if a satellite was anywhere above its center, place it one cell above; if it was to the left, place it one cell to the left; and so on.
Grid: The grid is 15 rows by 15 columns. The background is black (.). The output grid has the same dimensions. Only the center pixels and their collapsed satellites appear in the output; all other cells are black.
"Loyal pets hear their owner's whistle and come running home."
120b: k=1
See: Two homeowners live on a vast dark field — one in a blue house, one in a red house. Each owner has pets of a signature color: the blue owner keeps orange cats, and the red owner keeps green dogs. The pets have wandered off along the roads (rows and columns) leading away from home, some near, some far. A few stray animals roam the field too, but they belong to nobody.
Do: Each owner stands on the porch and calls their pets home. Every pet hears the whistle and bolts straight back along the road it wandered down, not stopping until it reaches the yard — curling up in the very first patch of grass next to the front door, on whichever side it came running from. The strays, hearing no familiar voice, simply vanish into the night. When morning comes, each home stands with its faithful companions huddled as close as possible, one on each side they returned from.
Grid: The dark field is 15 plots by 15 plots. Two homes — blue and red — anchor the scene. After the calling, only the homes and their returned pets remain; the rest of the field is empty darkness.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15. There are two homes: blue house B and red house R. Pets: orange cats O belong to blue, green dogs G belong to red. They are placed somewhere along rows/columns emanating from the house? In example, we see B at (row3 col4?) Let's index rows starting 0. Input example1 grid: I'll map coordinates. I'll rewrite input example1 rows with indices. Row0: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." Row1: all . Row2: "O . . B . . . . . O . . . . ." Row3: all . Row4: all . Row5: all . Row6: all . Row7: all . Row8: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." Row9: all . Row10: ". . . . . . G . . . . R . . ." Row11: all . Row12: all . Row13: all . Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." Output example1: Row0: all . Row1: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . O B O . . . . . . . . . ." Row3: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." Rows4-9 all . Row10: ". . . . . . . . . . . G R . ." Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." Rows12-14 all . Observations: In input, B at (2,3). O's at (0,3), (2,0), (2,9), (8,3). Also O at (6,0) and (6,14) in row6? Wait row6: "O . . . . B . . . . . . . . O" yes O at (6,0) and (6,14). That's far from B. In output, O's have moved to positions adjacent to B along same row or column direction they came from. Let's see: B at (2,3). Output O's at (2,2) left side, (2,4) right side, (1,3) above, (3,3) below. That's exactly one step away in each cardinal direction where there was at least one O somewhere along that line in input. Indeed there were O's in same column above (0,3) and below (8,3) and also maybe below further? Also O's in same row left (2,0) and right (2,9). So they returned to immediate neighbor cells. Similarly for R at (10,11). Input G's at (10,6) same row left, (14,11) same column below, maybe also (0,11?) No. Also G at (0,11?) Actually row0 col11 is '.'; row0 col? there is G at row0 col11? Row0: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." No G. Row14 col10? row14 has G at col10? Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." That's col11? Let's count: indices 0-14. Row14: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 G,12 .,13 .,14 . So G at (14,11) same column below R. Also maybe G at (10,6) left. Output shows G at (10,10) left neighbor? Wait output row10: ". . . . . . . . . . . G R . ." So G at col10 (one left of R at col11). Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." That's G at (11,11) below R (one down). So matches. Other stray O's at (6,0) and (6,14) are not aligned with B (row6 not same row/col). So they vanish. Similarly stray G's not aligned vanish. Thus rule: For each house (B or R), look along its row and column for same-colored pet (O for B, G for R). If any pet of that color exists in that direction (any distance), then place a pet of that color adjacent to the house on that side (up/down/left/right) in output. Remove all other elements; only houses and possibly adjacent pets remain. If multiple pets in same direction, still only one adjacent pet. Also note that if there are multiple house ... [3470 chars truncated]
"Two nuclei in a shared cell each emit chemical signals along their axes. Scattered organelles that detect the right signal retract along their microtubule, docking flush against the nucleus membrane. Organelles deaf to both signals dissolve."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cell with two distinct nuclei, each broadcasting along orthogonal fibers. Colored organelles drift at various distances along those fibers, while stray particles float freely.
Do: Each organelle that lies on its nucleus's fiber retracts to dock in the immediately adjacent position. Stray particles are digested. The cytoplasm clears.
Grid: 15x15 black grid. Two special pixels (B, R) are nuclei. O pixels on B's axes and G pixels on R's axes are organelles. Output: organelles dock one step from their nucleus in the same direction.
"Two stars anchor a binary system — a blue giant and a red dwarf. Orange comets orbit along the blue star's gravitational meridians; green asteroids drift along the red dwarf's. A gravitational pulse causes every body to fall inward, each settling into the closest stable orbit — one unit from its star, same bearing. Rogue debris with no gravitational parent is flung into the void."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A star chart with two stars and small bodies aligned along their cardinal axes at various distances, plus unbound debris.
Do: Collapse each body to one cell from its star, preserving direction. Remove debris.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are stars. O on B's axes, G on R's. Output: adjacent positions.
"Two lighthouses stand in a dark harbor — one flashing blue, one flashing red. Orange buoys have been set along the blue lighthouse's cardinal bearings, and green channel markers line the red lighthouse's. A harbor master orders all markers reeled in to the nearest mooring — one boat-length from their lighthouse, same heading. Driftwood is cleared from the water."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A harbor chart with two lighthouses and navigation markers along their cardinal bearings, plus floating debris.
Do: Reel each marker to one cell from its lighthouse, keeping the same heading. Clear debris.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are lighthouses. O on B's bearings, G on R's. Collapse to adjacent.
"Two ICs sit on a dark circuit board — one marked blue, one red. Orange capacitors are soldered at various points along the blue chip's trace lines running in the four cardinal directions. Green resistors sit on the red chip's traces. A design revision calls for all components to be moved to the pad immediately next to their chip, same trace direction. Floating components with no trace connection are desoldered."
120b: k=2
See: A PCB layout with two chips and passive components along their cardinal traces, plus stray components.
Do: Move each component to the pad adjacent to its chip on the same trace. Remove unconnected components.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are ICs. O on B's traces, G on R's traces. Output: one cell from chip.
We need to infer rule. From description: "PCB layout with two chips and passive components along their cardinal traces, plus stray components. Move each component to the pad adjacent to its chip on the same trace. Remove unconnected components. Output: one cell from chip." Interpretation: Input grid contains chips (B blue and R red). There are components (O orange, G green) placed along same row or column (cardinal trace) as chip. Need to move each component to the pad adjacent to its chip on same trace (i.e., shift component towards chip until adjacent cell next to chip). Remove unconnected components (components not on same row/col as any chip). Output includes only the chip cell? Actually "Output: one cell from chip." maybe means keep chip cell as is? In examples, output shows chips remain same location? Let's examine Example1. Input Example1: Let's map coordinates (row, col 0-index). 15x15. I'll note positions: - B at (2,3) (row2 col3) - R at (10,11) (row10 col11) - O's at (0,3), (2,0), (2,9), (8,3) - G's at (10,5), (14,11) Also maybe other O? That's all. Output Example1: - B still at (2,3) unchanged. - R still at (10,11) unchanged. - O's moved? Output shows O's at (1,3), (2,2), (2,4), (3,3). That's a cross around B. Indeed original O's on same row/col as B: O at (0,3) same column above B; O at (2,0) same row left; O at (2,9) same row right; O at (8,3) same column below. They have been moved to adjacent cells next to B: up (1,3), left (2,2), right (2,4), down (3,3). So they moved one step towards B, ending adjacent. What about G's around R? Input G at (10,5) same row left of R; G at (14,11) same column below R. Output shows G at (10,5) unchanged? Wait output shows G at (10,5) still? Let's see output rows: row10 (index10) line: ". . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." Actually output row10: columns: at col10? Let's count: row10 output: ". . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." So G at col10? Wait original R at col11. So G at col10 is left adjacent to R. Indeed original G at (10,5) far left; moved to (10,10) which is adjacent left of R (col10). That's not just one step; it's moved all the way to adjacent cell next to chip, regardless of distance. Similarly G at (14,11) below R moved to (11,11) (row11) which is adjacent below R. Output row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." Indeed G at (11,11). So rule: For each component of a given color (O for B chip, G for R chip) that lies on same row or column as its chip, move it to the cell directly adjacent to the chip on that side (i.e., same row/col, next to chip). Remove other components not aligned. Now Example2. Input positions: - B at (10,11) (row10 col11) - R at (4,3) (row4 col3) - G's at (0,3), (4,0), (4,8), (9,3) maybe also? Let's list: row0 col3 G; row4 col0 G; row4 col8 G; row9 col3 G. Also maybe others? That's it. - O's at (6,11)?? Actually row6 col11 O; row10 col13 O; row10 col14 O; row14 col11 O. Also O at (10,13?) Wait row10 line: ". . . . . O . . . . . B . . O" Actually row10: columns: 0-14. At col5 ... [5719 chars truncated]
"Two gods dwell in the void — one cloaked in blue flame, one in red. Their acolytes, scattered along the sacred axes of their temples, hear the summoning horn and rush to kneel at the threshold — one step from the divine seat, on whichever sacred road they traveled. Wandering souls with no patron are unmade."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A void with two divine seats and acolytes placed along cardinal sacred roads, plus wandering souls.
Do: Each acolyte moves to the cell adjacent to their god, preserving the sacred direction. Wandering souls vanish.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are gods. O acolytes on B's axes, G on R's. Collapse to adjacent cells.
"Two lead dancers hold their marks on a dark stage — one in blue, one in red. Their partners, positioned at various distances along the four cardinal lines, hear the music shift and glide inward, each finishing one step from their lead, maintaining the line they started on. Dancers without a lead drift offstage."
120b: k=1
See: A stage with two leads and partner dancers along their cardinal lines at various distances, plus extras.
Do: Each partner glides to one step from their lead, same direction. Extras exit.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are leads. O on B's lines, G on R's lines. Output: one cell from lead.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 15x15. Output shows some changes: In example, B at (row3,col4) (0-index? Let's index rows 1-15, columns 1-15). Input: row3 col4 B. O's at various positions: row1 col4 O, row3 col1 O, row3 col11 O, row9 col4 O, row11 col7 G, row11 col13 R, row15 col12 G. Output: B unchanged location? In output B still at row3 col4. O's changed: many O's moved? Output shows O's forming a cross around B? Let's see output O positions: row2 col4 O, row3 col3 O, row3 col5 O, row4 col4 O. That's a plus shape centered at B, one step away in cardinal directions. Also original O's elsewhere removed. Also G and R unchanged? Output shows G at row11 col7 unchanged, R at row11 col13 unchanged, G at row15 col12 unchanged. Also extra O at row2 col4 etc. So rule: For each lead (B and R) there are partner dancers (O for B, G for R?) Actually description: B and R are leads. O on B's lines, G on R's lines. In example, O's are placed along same row or column as B? Let's see: B at (3,4). O's in input: (1,4) same column above, (3,1) same row left, (3,11) same row right, (9,4) same column below. So O's are on same row/col as B at various distances. Similarly, G's on R's lines: R at (11,13). G's at (11,7) same row left, (15,12) not same row/col? Actually (15,12) is not same row or column as R (row15 col12). Wait also there is G at (15,12) maybe on same column? R column 13, G column12 not same. So maybe there is also G at (15,12) not aligned. But output retains G at (11,7) and (15,12). So maybe rule only applies to leads that have partner dancers (O for B, G for R) aligned cardinally. Then we move each partner one step towards lead? Actually description: "Each partner glides to one step from their lead, same direction. Extras exit." Means each partner moves to be one step away from lead, in same direction as originally relative? In example, O's originally at various distances; they all move to be exactly one step away from B, preserving direction (i.e., if O was above B, it moves to cell directly above B (one step). If left, moves left one step, etc.) So they all converge to the four adjacent cells around B. If multiple O's on same direction? Not in example. After moving, the original O positions are cleared (extras exit). So output shows O's only at adjacent cells. Similarly for R: partners are G. Input G's aligned with R: there is G at (11,7) same row left. Also maybe G at (15,12) not aligned, so it's extra and should be removed? In output, G at (11,7) remains? Actually output shows G at (11,7) unchanged? Wait output row11 col7 G present, also row12 col7 G? Let's check output: row11 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." Actually output row11: columns? Let's count: row11 in output: ". . . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." So G at col12? Wait need to map. Input row11: ". . . . . . . G . . . . . R . ." Actually original row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait need to re-evaluate. Let's list input rows with indices. I'll rewrite example input grid ... [8413 chars truncated]
"Two magma vents pierce a dark plain — one glowing blue-hot, one red-hot. Orange mineral deposits have crystallized along the blue vent's fracture lines extending in the four cardinal directions. Green mineral veins trace the red vent's fractures. A seismic compression event drives every deposit inward along its fracture until it fuses to the vent wall — one cell out, same bearing. Loose sediment is erased."
120b: k=1
See: A geological survey with two vents and mineral deposits along their cardinal fracture lines, plus loose sediment.
Do: Compress each deposit to one cell from its vent along the same fracture. Erase sediment.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are vents. O on B's fractures, G on R's. Collapse to adjacent positions.
We need to infer rule. From example 1: Input grid 15x15. Let's map coordinates. Use (row, col) 0-index. Input has B at (2,3). R at (10,11). O's at (0,3), (2,0), (2,9), (8,3). G's at (10,5), (14,11). Also maybe others? Let's list. Output: O's moved? Output shows O's around B: at (1,3), (2,2), (2,4), (3,3). That's a cross centered at B. In input, O's were at (0,3) above B two rows up? Actually B at (2,3). O at (0,3) is two rows above. O at (2,0) left far. O at (2,9) right far. O at (8,3) below far. In output, O's are compressed to adjacent cells (up, left, right, down) of B. So rule: For each vent (B or R), there are deposits (O for B, G for R) placed along same row or column (cardinal directions) possibly at any distance. They get collapsed to the immediate neighbor cell in that direction (adjacent) of the vent. Also original deposits removed (erased). Sediment (maybe other colors) erased? In example, there were no other colors besides O and G. Also note G's around R: Input G at (10,5) left of R (col 5 vs 11) same row. Also G at (14,11) below R same column. Output shows G at (10,10) left adjacent? Wait output shows row 10: ". . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." Let's index: row10 output: columns: 0-14. At col9? Let's count: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 G,10 R,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 . So G at col9, R at col10. In input R at col11. So left neighbor is col10? Actually immediate left of R is col10. But output shows R at col10, G at col9 (two left). Wait maybe they shift vent? Let's examine: Input R at (10,11). Output R at (10,10). So vent moved left one? Similarly B? Input B at (2,3). Output B at (2,2)? Let's check output row2: ". . O B O . . . . . . . . . ." Row2 columns: 0 .,1 .,2 O,3 B,4 O. So B stays at col3 same as input. So R moved? Let's verify row10 output: ". . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." So R at col10, B at col3 unchanged. Why R moved left? Maybe because there was a G deposit to its left, and they collapse to adjacent cell, but vent stays same, deposit moves to adjacent cell. However deposit should be at col10 (left neighbor). But output shows G at col9, R at col10. So deposit is left of vent? Actually vent at col11, left neighbor col10. Output shows vent at col10, deposit at col9. So both shifted left by one. Could be that vent also moves towards deposit? Let's examine other direction: deposit below R at (14,11). That's same column, below. In output, there is G at (11,9?) Wait output row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." Row11 col? Count: col0-10 ., col11 G? Actually row11: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 G,12 .,13 .,14 . So G at col11. That's directly below R's new position (col10)? No column mismatch. Let's compute: R new at (10,10). Below that same column is col10. But G appears at (11,11) which is down-right diagonal. Something off. Maybe I mis-copied output. Let's re-evaluate output grid lines from example: Output lines: 1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 2: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." 3: ". . ... [5005 chars truncated]
"Two master chefs stand at their stations, each calling back their scattered ingredients. The orange spices fly to the blue chef's cutting board; the green herbs rush to the red chef's. Each ingredient lands on the side it was fetched from, right next to the chef's hand. Anything unclaimed is swept off the counter."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A kitchen counter with two chefs and various ingredients scattered in straight lines from each chef. Some stray crumbs sit between them.
Do: Each ingredient slides along its line until it rests one space from its chef, on the same side it started. Crumbs are wiped away.
Grid: 15x15 grid. B and R are chefs. O and G are ingredients aligned cardinally. Output collapses ingredients to adjacent cells.
"Two conductors stand on a vast stage, each commanding their own section of the orchestra. The brass players scattered along the blue conductor's sightlines gather close, taking the seat directly beside the podium in whichever direction they were sitting. The woodwinds do the same for the red conductor. Musicians not in anyone's line of sight leave the stage."
120b: k=1
See: A stage with two conductors and musicians placed at various distances along their cardinal sightlines, plus a few stagehands milling about.
Do: Each musician slides inward to occupy the chair immediately next to their conductor, preserving the compass direction. Stagehands exit.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are conductors. O on B's axes, G on R's axes. Collapse to adjacent positions.
We need to infer rule. From description: stage with two conductors (B and R). O on B's axes, G on R's axes. Musicians slide inward to occupy chair immediately next to their conductor, preserving compass direction. Stagehands exit. Interpretation: B and R are conductors. O are musicians associated with B, placed along same row or column (axes) as B. G are musicians associated with R, placed along same row or column as R. They slide inward towards the conductor, moving one step towards B or R, ending adjacent to conductor. O's that are already adjacent? In example, we see. Let's analyze Example 1. Input grid coordinates (0-index). Let's map. I'll list positions: Row0: col3 O (0,3) Row2: col0 O (2,0); col3 B (2,3); col9 O (2,9) Row8: col3 O (8,3) Row10: col5 G (10,5); col11 R (10,11) Row14: col11 G (14,11) Also maybe other O? That's all. Output grid: Row1: col3 O (1,3) moved down? Actually output row1 col3 O. Row2: col2 O (2,2); col3 B unchanged; col4 O (2,4) Row3: col3 O (3,3) Row10: col6 G (10,6); col11 R unchanged Row11: col6 G (11,6) So transformation: O's moved one step towards B (which is at (2,3)). Let's see each O's original relative direction to B. - O at (0,3) is north of B (same column). Moves one step south to (1,3). Yes. - O at (2,0) is west of B (same row). Moves east one step to (2,1)? But output shows O at (2,2). Wait there is O at (2,2) not (2,1). Actually there is also O at (2,4) east side. Let's examine. Original O at (2,0) west of B. Should move east one step to (2,1). But output shows O at (2,2). Maybe there were two O's on same row: left and right of B. They both slide inward to become adjacent to B on both sides, but they cannot occupy same cell as B. So left O moves to (2,2)? That would be two steps east, not one. Let's check also O at (2,9) east of B. It moves west to (2,4) (since output O at col4). That's 5 steps left, not one. Hmm maybe rule: O's slide towards B until they become adjacent to B, i.e., occupy the cell directly next to B on that side, regardless of distance, moving all the way inward. So they "collapse" onto the adjacent cell next to conductor, preserving direction (i.e., they end up on the cell adjacent to B in the direction from B to O). So O's on same row left side end up at B's left adjacent cell (col2). O's on right side end up at B's right adjacent cell (col4). O's above end up at B's up adjacent cell (row1). O's below would end at row3. Thus O's all converge to the four neighboring cells of B, possibly multiple O's overlapping? In example, there were O's on left and right and above. They each occupy distinct adjacent cells. No O below. Similarly G's relative to R at (10,11). G at (10,5) same row left side, moves to left adjacent cell (col10). Output G at (10,6) actually column6? Wait B's column is 11, left adjacent is col10. But output shows G at col6? Let's compute: Input G at (10,5) left of R (col11). Distance 6 columns. Adjacent left cell to R is col10. But output G at (10,6) which ... [6764 chars truncated]
"Two quarterbacks drop back in the pocket. Their receivers, spread wide along the yard lines and sidelines, run tight comeback routes, stopping exactly one step from the QB. Receivers wearing orange answer the blue QB's cadence; green jerseys respond to the red QB. Players from neither roster walk off the field."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A field with two QBs and receivers spread along straight lines at varying distances. Some bystanders stand in random spots.
Do: Each receiver runs directly toward their QB and stops one yard away, maintaining the same compass bearing. Bystanders are removed.
Grid: 15x15 grid. B=blue QB, R=red QB, O=blue receivers on cardinal axes, G=red receivers. Output places each one step from their QB.
"Two storm eyes form on the radar, one cold-blue, one angry-red. Orange lightning bolts crackle along the blue eye's meridians; green rain bands spiral along the red eye's. As the storms intensify, all that distant energy contracts until each bolt and band hugs the eyewall — one pixel from the calm center. Scattered cloud wisps dissipate."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A radar map with two storm centers and colored weather phenomena extending along their cardinal axes, plus faint noise.
Do: All phenomena contract to the cell immediately adjacent to their storm center, preserving direction. Noise vanishes.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are eyes. O along B's axes, G along R's axes. Collapse inward by one cell from center.
"Two monuments stand in an empty plaza. Along the avenues radiating north, south, east, and west from the blue monument, orange lanterns have been placed at various distances. Green banners line the streets extending from the red monument. A decree orders every lantern and banner moved to the nearest lamppost — the one directly beside its monument. Decorations not on any avenue are removed."
120b: k=1
See: A plaza with two monuments and decorations placed along straight roads extending from each.
Do: Move each decoration to the position immediately adjacent to its monument, keeping the same street direction. Remove everything else.
Grid: 15x15 grid. B, R are monuments. O on B's cardinal lines, G on R's. Output: one cell away from center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 15x15. In example, there are two monuments: B (blue) and R (red). Decorations: O (orange) on B's cardinal lines, G (green) on R's. Output: each decoration moved to position immediately adjacent to its monument, keeping same street direction. Remove everything else. Let's examine example to confirm. Input example coordinates (0-index rows). Let's map. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." => O at (0,3) Row2: "O . . B . . . . . O . . . . ." => O at (2,0), B at (2,3), O at (2,9) Row8: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." => O at (8,3) Row10: ". . . . . G . . . . . R . . ." => G at (10,5), R at (10,11) Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." => G at (14,11) Also maybe other O? That's all. Now output grid: Row1: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." => O at (1,3) Row2: ". . O B O . . . . . . . . . ." => O at (2,2) left of B, O at (2,4) right of B Row3: ". . . O . . . . . . . . . . ." => O at (3,3) Row10: ". . . . . . . . . . G R . . ." => G at (10,10) left of R? Wait R at (10,11) in input. Output shows G at (10,10) left of R, and R stays at (10,11). Row11: ". . . . . . . . . . . G . . ." => G at (11,11) below R. So rule: For each monument (B,R), there are decorations (O for B, G for R) placed somewhere along same row or column (cardinal lines) extending from monument (i.e., same row or same column). In input, there may be multiple decorations along each direction (maybe multiple O's). In output, we keep only those decorations that are exactly one cell away from the monument, in the same direction as they were originally relative to the monument. So we shift each decoration towards the monument until distance 1? Actually we "move each decoration to the position immediately adjacent to its monument, keeping the same street direction." That means for each decoration, we compute direction from monument to decoration (up/down/left/right). Then place a decoration of same type at the cell adjacent to monument in that direction (i.e., one step from monument). Remove all other cells (including original decorations and other elements). Also keep monuments themselves? In output, B and R remain at same positions. Yes. Also note that if there are multiple decorations in same direction, they all map to same adjacent cell? In example, there were O's at (0,3) above B (same column). Also O at (8,3) below B. Also O at (2,0) left of B, O at (2,9) right of B. Output shows O at (1,3) (above B), O at (3,3) (below B), O at (2,2) left, O at (2,4) right. So each direction got one O. Even though there were two O's left? Actually only one left (2,0). So fine. For R: G at (10,5) left of R, G at (14,11) below R. Output shows G at (10,10) left (adjacent), and G at (11,11) below. So works. Thus rule: For each monument (color B or R), find all decorations of its associated color (O for B, G for R) that share same row or column (i.e., aligned). For each such decoration, place a c ... [3261 chars truncated]
"Two generals plant their banners on the battlefield — one blue, one red. Their scouts, deployed far along the cardinal roads, receive the recall signal. Each scout marches back and takes up a guard position one pace from the banner, on whichever road they were patrolling. Deserters with no allegiance vanish in the fog of war."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A battlefield with two banners and scouts stretched along straight roads from each. A few unaffiliated figures stand elsewhere.
Do: Each scout returns to the position one step from their general's banner, preserving their patrol direction. Unaffiliated figures are removed.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are banners. O scouts on B's axes, G scouts on R's. Collapse to adjacent.
"Two spotlight operators sit in the rigging above a dark stage. Each has colored gel filters stored at various distances along the catwalks running north-south and east-west from their chair. When the director calls 'places,' every filter slides along its catwalk rail to the slot right next to its operator. Filters that fell off the catwalks are lost."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage grid with two operators and colored filters at varying distances along perpendicular catwalks from each.
Do: Slide each filter along its rail to the slot immediately beside its operator. Remove any filter not on a catwalk.
Grid: 15x15 black grid. B and R are operators. O filters on B's cross, G on R's cross. Output: adjacent to center.
"Two ancient trees grow in a vast garden — one with blue bark, one with red. Orange mushrooms have sprouted along the roots extending in the four cardinal directions from the blue tree, while green moss patches cling to the red tree's roots. Come autumn, the roots contract, pulling each growth tight against the trunk — one handspan away, same direction. Weeds with no root connection wither."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A garden with two trees and growths along their root lines. Stray weeds dot the soil.
Do: Pull each growth to the cell adjacent to its tree, preserving direction. Remove weeds.
Grid: 15x15 black. B and R are trees. O on B's cardinal axes, G on R's. Collapse to one cell from trunk.
See: The input grid has a fixed row of azure (A) cells along the bottom. Above this azure row, one or more distinct colored shapes (connected groups of non-orange, non-azure cells) rest on or near the azure floor. The rest of the grid is filled with orange (O) background cells.
Do: For each colored shape in the grid, count its total number of cells (its area). Then move that entire shape upward by exactly that many rows. The azure bottom row remains fixed in place. All vacated cells become orange background. Shapes maintain their exact internal arrangement — only their vertical position changes.
Grid: The grid is 8 columns wide and 8 rows tall. The bottom row is always entirely azure (A). The background color is orange (O). Shapes occupy the rows above the azure floor and are composed of non-orange, non-azure colored cells.
"Helium balloons rising by the breath it took to fill them"
120b: k=1
See: An orange sky stretches above an azure launchpad. Clustered on or near the pad, colorful balloons of various shapes wait, freshly inflated and straining against the ground. Each balloon is a tight knot of same-colored or distinctly colored cells, full of lift.
Do: Release the balloons. Each one rises into the orange sky — the more air inside it, the higher it floats. A balloon's buoyancy is measured by its fullness: every breath of color it holds carries it one story higher. The launchpad stays bolted to the earth, and the sky fills in behind each balloon as it ascends.
Grid: The sky is 8 columns wide and 8 stories tall. The azure launchpad is the ground floor, permanent and immovable. The orange atmosphere fills every space not claimed by a balloon. Each balloon keeps its shape perfectly as it drifts upward — no stretching, no tumbling, just a clean vertical ascent.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input 8x8 grid. Output same size. Interpretation: orange sky = O, azure launchpad = A at bottom row? In input, bottom row is A's across entire row. That's launchpad, stays same in output (bottom row unchanged). Balloons are clusters of same-colored cells (non-O, non-A) that are "tight knots". They rise upward, moving vertically until they hit something? The sky fills behind each balloon as it ascends (i.e., cells vacated become O). The launchpad stays. In example1 input: Let's map. Rows index 0 top to 7 bottom. Input rows: 0: O O O O O O O O 1: O O O O O O O O 2: O O O O O O O O 3: O O O O O O O O 4: O O O O O O O O 5: O W O O O O O O 6: W W W O O R R R 7: A A A A A A A A We have colors: W (maroon) cluster at rows5-6 columns0-2? Let's locate. Row5 col1 = W (since row5: O W O O O O O O) column index1. Row6: W W W O O R R R (col0,1,2 are W; col5,6,7 are R) So there are two balloons: one of W (maroon) shape: cells at (5,1), (6,0),(6,1),(6,2). That's a shape maybe 4 cells. Another balloon of R (red) shape: cells at (6,5),(6,6),(6,7) three cells. They rise upward. In output: Rows: 0: O O O O O O O O 1: O W O O O O O O 2: W W W O O O O O 3: O O O O O R R R 4: O O O O O O O O 5: O O O O O O O O 6: O O O O O O O O 7: A A A A A A A A We see W cluster moved up: originally bottom rows5-6 now at rows1-2. Specifically output row1 col1 = W (was row5 col1). Output row2 col0-2 = W (was row6 col0-2). So they moved up by 4 rows? Let's compute shift: original topmost W cell at row5 moved to row1 => shift -4 rows (up 4). Original bottommost W at row6 moved to row2 => also up 4. So whole cluster moved up 4 rows. R cluster originally at row6 col5-7 moved to row3 col5-7 (output). That's shift -3 rows (up 3). Wait topmost R row6 -> row3 shift -3. Why different shift amounts? Possibly each balloon rises until it hits either top of grid or another balloon that has already risen? But they rise simultaneously? The rule may be: each balloon rises as far as possible until it would collide with another balloon or the top, but they cannot pass through each other; order maybe based on size (fullness) i.e., more cells rise higher (more buoyancy). The description: "the more air inside it, the higher it floats. A balloon's buoyancy is measured by its fullness: every breath of color it holds carries it one story higher." So number of cells determines how high it goes (i.e., vertical offset). So each balloon moves up by number of cells in its cluster? Let's test: W cluster size = 4 cells. It moved up 4 rows. Yes! R cluster size = 3 cells, moved up 3 rows. That matches. Thus rule: For each non-O, non-A colored connected component (4-directionally?) treat as balloon. Compute its size (number of cells). Move the entire component upward by that many rows, preserving shape, as long as within grid (no overflow). The launchpad (A row) stays bottom. The vacated cells become O (sky). If moving would go out of bounds (above top), mayb ... [2318 chars truncated]
"Spores releasing from the forest floor"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nutrient-rich azure substrate lines the bottom of a petri dish. Colonies of various pigmented organisms cling to the substrate surface, each a distinct cluster of colored cells against an orange growth medium.
Do: Each colony undergoes sporulation — the more cells in the colony, the higher its spores are launched into the medium. The substrate remains rooted. The colonies lift intact, carried by the collective metabolic energy of every cell in the cluster.
Grid: 8 columns by 8 rows. Bottom row is the azure substrate. Orange fills empty medium. Colored clusters are the organisms.
"Stellar bodies escaping a gravity well by their combined luminosity"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure event horizon marks the bottom of the observation field. Colored stellar formations sit near this boundary, each constellation a distinct hue, against the deep orange nebular glow.
Do: Each formation achieves escape velocity proportional to its total luminosity — the more stars burning in the cluster, the farther it climbs from the horizon. The event horizon is immovable. Each constellation preserves its shape as it ascends through the nebula.
Grid: 8 sectors wide, 8 layers of space. Azure bottom is the event horizon. Orange is the nebula. Colored groups are stellar formations.
"Cargo crates buoyed upward by the air pockets sealed inside"
120b: k=1
See: An azure dock line runs along the bottom of the harbor cross-section. Colored cargo bundles rest near the dock, submerged in the murky orange water of the harbor.
Do: Each cargo bundle floats upward — the more crates lashed together, the more trapped air buoys them higher. The dock stays anchored at the bottom. Each bundle rises intact through the orange water, preserving its packing arrangement.
Grid: 8-berth harbor, 8 fathoms deep. Azure bottom is the dock. Orange is harbor water. Colored clusters are cargo bundles.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input 8x8 grid. Bottom row is A (azure) dock. Above that row 7 has some W (maroon) and R (red). Row6 has W at col1? Let's index columns 1-8. Input example1 rows top to bottom: 1: O O O O O O O O 2: O O O O O O O O 3: O O O O O O O O 4: O O O O O O O O 5: O O O O O O O O 6: O W O O O O O O 7: W W W O O R R R 8: A A A A A A A A Output rows: 1: O O O O O O O O 2: O W O O O O O O 3: W W W O O O O O 4: O O O O O R R R 5: O O O O O O O O 6: O O O O O O O O 7: O O O O O O O O 8: A A A A A A A A Observation: The dock (A row) stays same at bottom. The colored clusters (W and R) have moved upward. They seem to "float" upward through orange water (O). The clusters maintain shape but move up until they hit something? In output, the W cluster originally at rows6-7 columns? Let's map. Input W positions: Row6 col2 = W Row7 col1-3 = W W W Also row7 col6-8 = R R R So there are two clusters: a cluster of W (size 4) shaped like a L? Actually positions: (6,2), (7,1),(7,2),(7,3). That's a 2x3 block missing (6,1) and (6,3). In output, W cluster appears at rows2-3? Output rows2 col2 = W, row3 col1-3 = W W W. So same shape moved up 4 rows (from rows6-7 to rows2-3). So moved upward until topmost row? It moved until row2-3, not row1-2. Why not further? Possibly because there is another cluster above? No other colored above. Maybe because the cluster cannot go beyond the topmost row (row1) but shape height is 2 rows, so topmost position would be rows1-2. But they stopped at rows2-3. So maybe they stop when they would intersect another cluster that is also moving? Let's see R cluster. R positions input: row7 col6,7,8. That's a horizontal line of length3 at row7. In output, R appears at row4 col6-8. So moved up 3 rows (from row7 to row4). Could have moved further up to row1? But maybe limited by something else: maybe they stop when they encounter the top of the grid or another cluster that is "more buoyant"? The W cluster moved more (4 rows) than R (3 rows). The description: "the more crates lashed together, the more trapped air buoys them higher." So larger cluster rises higher (more rows). So each cluster moves upward a number of rows proportional to its size (maybe number of cells). In example, W cluster size =4 cells, moved up 4 rows? Let's check: original topmost cell of W cluster at row6 (col2). After moving, topmost cell at row2 (col2). That's 4 rows upward (6->2). Yes moved up 4 rows. R cluster size =3 cells, moved up 3 rows (row7->row4). Yes. Thus rule: each connected component of non-O, non-A? Actually colored cargo bundles (any color except O and A) move upward by number of cells in that component. They keep same relative arrangement. They cannot move beyond top row (row1). If movement would exceed top, maybe they stop at top? Not seen. Also they cannot overlap; maybe they move simultaneously but larger clusters move more, possibly overlapping? In example they didn't overlap because they were separate columns. ... [1780 chars truncated]
"Charge packets climbing a potential ladder by their electron count"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure ground rail runs along the bottom of the circuit board. Colored charge clusters sit near the rail, each a different signal type, against the orange copper substrate.
Do: Each charge packet is driven up the potential gradient — the more electrons it carries, the more rungs it climbs. The ground rail stays fixed. Each packet maintains its waveform shape as it migrates upward through the substrate.
Grid: 8-trace board, 8 layers. Azure bottom is the ground rail. Orange is the substrate. Colored groups are charge packets.
"Offerings ascending to the heavens by the devotion poured into them"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure altar stretches across the base of the sacred column. Colored offerings of various sizes rest upon the altar, each a different tribute, glowing against the orange ethereal mist.
Do: Each offering levitates toward the heavens — the more pieces laid in tribute, the higher the gods lift it. The altar remains earthbound. Each offering holds its sacred arrangement as it ascends through the mist.
Grid: 8 pillars wide, 8 tiers of heaven. Azure bottom is the altar. Orange is the ethereal mist. Colored groups are the offerings.
"Troupes leaping by the collective spring of their dancers"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure dance floor spans the bottom of the stage. Troupes of differently colored dancers hold formation near the floor, surrounded by the warm orange spotlight wash.
Do: Each troupe performs a grand jeté — the more dancers pushing off together, the higher the ensemble soars. The dance floor stays grounded. Each troupe holds its choreographed arrangement mid-leap, orange light filling the space below.
Grid: 8-position stage, 8 heights. Azure bottom is the dance floor. Orange is the spotlight wash. Colored formations are the troupes.
"Mineral veins thrust upward by tectonic pressure proportional to their mass"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure bedrock layer lies at the base of the geological cross-section. Colored mineral deposits sit near the bedrock, each a different ore cluster, embedded in orange sedimentary matrix.
Do: Each mineral vein is thrust upward by tectonic forces — the more crystalline mass in the deposit, the greater the uplift. The bedrock stays immovable. Each deposit preserves its crystal structure as it's pushed through the sediment, orange matrix backfilling the void.
Grid: 8-column cross-section, 8 strata deep. Azure bottom is bedrock. Orange is sedimentary matrix. Colored clusters are mineral deposits.
"Dough rising in the oven's heat"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure baking sheet sits at the bottom of the oven. Lumps of differently colored dough rest on or near the sheet, surrounded by the warm orange glow of the oven cavity.
Do: Each lump of dough rises — the more flour kneaded into it, the higher it climbs. Bigger lumps contain more yeast and lift proportionally higher. The baking sheet stays put, and the dough holds its shape as it ascends through the heat.
Grid: 8-wide, 8-tall oven interior. Azure bottom is the baking sheet. Orange is ambient heat. Colored lumps are the dough pieces.
"Notes leaping off the staff by the weight of their chord"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure bass clef line anchors the bottom of the score. Clusters of colored notes sit near this foundation, each group a different timbre, resting against an orange parchment backdrop.
Do: Each chord ascends the staff — the richer the voicing, the higher it soars. A chord's leap is measured by how many notes sound together. The bass line holds steady while the harmonies float upward, preserving their internal intervals.
Grid: 8 measures wide, 8 lines tall. The azure bottom is the bass anchor. Orange is blank parchment. Colored clusters are note groupings.
"Athletes vaulting from the springboard by the size of their team"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure springboard stretches across the bottom of the arena. Teams of differently colored athletes stand huddled on or near the board, surrounded by the orange mat of the competition floor.
Do: Each team launches off the springboard in formation — the larger the squad, the higher their vault carries them. They hold their huddle shape mid-air. The springboard stays bolted to the floor, and the mat fills where they stood.
Grid: 8-lane arena, 8 rows high. Azure bottom is the springboard. Orange is the mat. Colored groups are athlete teams.
"Storm clouds lifted by their own turbulence"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure pressure front lies along the ground. Pockets of colored precipitation hang low in an orange hazy sky, each cloud bank a distinct hue and shape.
Do: Each cloud formation is pushed upward by convective force proportional to its mass — the more condensation in the cloud, the more violent its updraft. The pressure front stays grounded, and clear orange sky fills the void beneath each risen cloud.
Grid: 8 columns of atmosphere, 8 layers high. Azure ground-level front at bottom. Orange is ambient sky. Colored masses are the cloud formations.
"Floors of a building jacked up by their own square footage"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure foundation slab spans the base of the blueprint. Colored structural modules sit atop or near the foundation, each a different material, against the orange drafting paper background.
Do: Each module is hydraulically raised — the more floor area it occupies, the higher the jacks push it. The foundation never moves. Modules keep their exact blueprint shape as they ascend, leaving empty orange draft space below.
Grid: 8-unit wide, 8-story blueprint. Azure bottom is the foundation. Orange is blank paper. Colored blocks are structural modules.
"Siege towers elevated by the garrison within"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure fortification wall runs along the bottom of the battlefield. Colored war engines of various sizes sit near the wall, surrounded by the orange dust of the siege ground.
Do: Each war engine is hoisted skyward by the soldiers manning it — the larger the crew, the higher they raise their tower. The fortification wall holds firm. Each engine maintains its battle formation as it ascends through the dust.
Grid: 8-span battlefield, 8 levels high. Azure bottom wall is the fortification. Orange is the siege ground. Colored shapes are war engines.
"Props ascending on rigging by the number of stagehands pulling"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An azure stage floor stretches across the bottom. Variously colored set pieces rest on the stage, each a different prop cluster, surrounded by the orange warmth of the stage lights.
Do: Each set piece is flown up into the flies — the more stagehands assigned to it (one per piece of the prop), the higher it's pulled. The stage floor stays fixed. Each prop keeps its silhouette intact as it rises on its rigging cables.
Grid: 8-wing stage, 8 battens high. Azure bottom is the stage floor. Orange is the lit void. Colored clusters are the set pieces.
"Seedlings sprouting by the vigor of their root mass"
120b: k=1
See: An azure layer of rich soil beds the bottom of the garden box. Colored seedling clusters push up from near the soil, each species a different hue, in a bed of warm orange mulch.
Do: Each seedling cluster shoots upward — the more roots in its mass, the taller it grows. The soil bed stays at the base. Each cluster maintains its leaf arrangement as it stretches skyward, orange mulch filling where stems once pressed.
Grid: 8-plot garden, 8 layers tall. Azure bottom is the soil. Orange is the mulch. Colored groups are seedling clusters.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 8x8. Bottom row is azure A (soil). Above that row 7 has some colored clusters: in example row7: "W W W O O R R R". Row6: "W O O O O O O O"? Actually input row6: "W O O O O O O O"? Let's list example1 input rows from top (row0) to bottom (row7): Row0: O O O O O O O O Row1: O O O O O O O O Row2: O O O O O O O O Row3: O O O O O O O O Row4: O O O O O O O O Row5: O W O O O O O O Row6: W W W O O R R R Row7: A A A A A A A A Output rows: Row0: O O O O O O O O Row1: O W O O O O O O Row2: W W W O O O O O Row3: O O O O O R R R Row4: O O O O O O O O Row5: O O O O O O O O Row6: O O O O O O O O Row7: A A A A A A A A Interpretation: clusters of non-A, non-O? Actually O is orange mulch. A is azure soil base stays same. The rule: each "seedling cluster" (colored group) shoots upward, taller based on number of roots (maybe count of cells in cluster). The cluster maintains leaf arrangement as it stretches skyward, orange mulch filling where stems once pressed. In input, there are two clusters: maroon W cluster at rows5-6 columns0-2? Let's map coordinates (col0-7). Row5: O W O O O O O O (W at col1). Row6: W W W O O R R R (W at col0,1,2). So W cluster shape: a 2x? Actually cells: (5,1), (6,0),(6,1),(6,2). That's like a shape of 4 cells. In output, the W cluster moved upward: appears at rows1-2? Output rows1: O W O O O O O O (same as input row5). Row2: W W W O O O O O (same as input row6 but R removed). So the W cluster shifted up by 4 rows? Input rows5-6 become output rows1-2. That's shift of -4 rows (upwards). The number of rows moved equals maybe the height of the cluster? Or number of rows of empty space below? Let's see R cluster: input row6 columns5-7 are R R R. In output they appear at row3 columns5-7. That's shift up by 3 rows (from row6 to row3). So shift amount differs per cluster. The rule: each cluster "shoots upward" by a number of rows equal to its size (number of cells) maybe? W cluster size = 4 cells, moved up 4 rows (from row6 to row2? Actually the lowest cell of cluster originally at row6 moved to row2 (difference 4). Yes. R cluster size = 3 cells, moved up 3 rows (from row6 to row3). That matches. Also the orange mulch (O) fills where stems once pressed: meaning the cells that the cluster vacated become O. Indeed in output, rows5-6 become all O (except A row). In output rows5-6 are all O. So the original positions of clusters become O (orange). Also the original O cells that were above clusters remain O. Thus rule: For each contiguous group of same non-O, non-A color (seedling cluster), shift the entire group upward by N rows where N = number of cells in the group. The shape is preserved (relative arrangement). The cells vacated become O. The bottom row A stays unchanged. Need to consider overlapping after shift? Not in example. Now test input: Rows (0-7): 0: O O O O O O O O 1: O O O O O O O O 2: O O O O O O O O 3: O O O O O O O O 4: O O O O O O O O 5: O O O O O O O O 6: X X X X X X O M 7: A ... [1537 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains exactly two colored pixels on a black background. These two pixels share either the same row or the same column, forming an axis between them. They are separated by some distance D (measured cell-to-cell).
Do: 1. Identify the two colored pixels and the axis (row or column) they share. Call them P1 and P2, where P1 is closer to the top or left edge. Let D be the distance between them along the shared axis. 2. Each pixel grows into an open-ended cross shape directed toward the other pixel: a. From P1, extend an arm along the shared axis toward P2, covering (D-3)/2 cells beyond P1 (not counting P1 itself). Call the endpoint of this arm the crossbar position. b. At the crossbar position, draw a perpendicular crossbar centered on the axis, extending 2 cells in each perpendicular direction (5 cells total including the axis cell). c. From the two ends of the crossbar, extend 1 additional cell toward P2 along the shared axis. These form corner pieces. 3. Repeat symmetrically for P2: extend an arm from P2 toward P1 for (D-3)/2 cells, draw a perpendicular 5-cell crossbar at the arm's end, and extend the crossbar endpoints 1 cell toward P1. 4. This leaves a 2-cell gap between the two shapes along the shared axis. The corner extensions from each crossbar face each other across this gap. 5. Each shape is drawn in the color of its originating pixel. The original pixel positions remain colored as part of their respective arms.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input exactly. The background is black (.). The two colored pixels are always aligned on the same row or same column, with enough surrounding space for the cross shapes to be drawn without clipping the grid edges.
"Two jousting knights lower their lances and charge, meeting shield-to-shield in the middle of the field."
120b: k=2
See: Two lone knights of different colors stand on a dark tournament field, facing each other across a shared lane — either the same row or the same column.
Do: Each knight charges toward the other, dragging their lance along the shared lane. Halfway to meeting, each knight plants a shield — a broad crossbar perpendicular to their charge — and the edges of the shield curl forward like pauldrons reaching toward the opponent. The two knights never collide; they halt with a narrow no-man's-land between their shields, close enough to lock eyes through the gap. Each knight's trail, shield, and pauldrons are forged in that knight's own heraldic color.
Grid: The tournament field keeps its original dimensions. The dark grass remains untouched except where each knight has carved a colored path. The two knights always share the same row or column, and the field is wide enough that no shield or lance stroke flies off the edge.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1: Input grid 10 rows? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines show 10 rows? Actually first example input shows 10 rows of 13 columns? Let's count: lines: row0 to row9? They show 10 rows. Input has G at (6,1?) Let's index rows 0-9, columns 0-12. Input: row6: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at column1, B at column12. So two knights of different colors in same row (row6). Output shows pattern: a cross shape? Let's examine output rows. Output row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So looks like knights at same row, they move towards each other, leaving a path (lance) of their color from original position towards center, stopping before meeting, leaving a gap of one cell? Actually they meet at column? Let's compute. Original positions: G at (6,1). B at (6,12). Distance = 11 cells apart. They move towards each other. In output, G's lance extends from its original position to some point near center. Let's see G cells: row6 columns 0? Actually row6 output: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So G occupies columns 1-5? plus column0? Wait column0 is '.'; column1 is G (original). columns2-5 also G. So G occupies columns1-5 inclusive (5 cells). B occupies columns8-12? Actually columns8-12 are B (5 cells). There's a gap at columns6-7? Row6 column6 '.' column7 '.' (gap). So they stopped with two empty cells between? Actually gap of two columns. Also there are vertical extensions: rows4-8 have G and B in column5? Let's see G vertical line at column5? Row4: columns5? Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So columns5=G,6=G,7=B,8=B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." So column5=G, column8=B. Row7 similar. Row8 same as row4. Thus shape: each knight creates a "cross" shape: a central shield (a perpendicular bar) at the midpoint? The description: each knight charges, dragging lance along lane (row). Halfway to meeting, each knight plants a shield — a broad crossbar perpendicular to their charge — and the edges of the shield curl forward like pauldrons reaching toward the opponent. So the shield is a perpendicular bar (vertical if lane is horizontal) centered at the knight's halfway point? The "edges curl forward" meaning the bar extends forward (toward opponent) maybe like a T shape? Actually output shows for G: vertical line at column5 (the shield) extending up and down from row6 (the lane) and also forward (right) from column5? Wait G's shield is vertical line at column5 rows4-8 (5 cells). That's perpendicular to lane (horizontal). The "edges curl forward" meaning at the ends of the vertical bar (top and bottom) there are horizontal extensions towards opponent? In output, at row4, there is also a G at column6 (right of vertical line) forming a small horizontal extension (pauldron). Similarly at row8 column6 G. So the vertical bar plus rightward extensions at its ends. Simil ... [11650 chars truncated]
"Two nerve cells reach across the void, sprouting dendrite branches as they stretch toward one another, their synaptic boutons flaring wide just before the gap where neurotransmitters must leap."
120b: fail
See: Two living cells resting in empty tissue, aligned along a shared nerve fiber.
Do: Each cell extends an axon toward the other, then fans out a dendritic arbor at the tip. The arbor's outermost fingers curl inward, reaching across the synaptic cleft but never quite touching.
Grid: The tissue stays dark. Each cell's growth is drawn in its own stain color, preserving the original soma.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x13? Actually example input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given input lines: first 5 rows of dots, then row with G at column2? Let's map. Example1 Input grid size: appears 10 rows, 13 columns. Row indices 0-9. Row6 (0-index) has " . G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at col1, B at col12? Actually columns 0-12. So two cells: one green, one blue, separated horizontally with many empty rows above and below. Output shows pattern: a shape connecting them: a line of G and B forming something like a plus? Let's visualize. Output rows (10 rows, 13 cols). Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So at row4, columns 5-6 G, 7-8 B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So pattern: looks like each cell extends a line (axon) towards each other horizontally? Actually cells at (row6,col1) G and (row6,col12) B. In output, there is a horizontal line of G from col1 to col5? Let's see row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". Starting at col1 G (original), then G at col2-5? Actually col0 is dot, col1 G (original), col2 G, col3 G, col4 G, col5 G, col6 dot, col7 dot, col8 B, col9 B, col10 B, col11 B, col12 B (original). So a continuous block of G from col1-5, then gap col6-7, then B block col8-12. So they extended towards each other, meeting at a gap of two columns (col6-7). Then vertical lines? At rows4-8 there are vertical arms forming a "dendritic arbor" at tip? At the tip of each line (the ends near the gap) there is a branching outward: For G side, at column5 (the tip) there is vertical line up and down: rows4-8 column5 have G? Let's check: row4 col5 G, row5 col5 G, row6 col5 G (already), row7 col5 G, row8 col5 G. Indeed column5 has G from rows4-8. Similarly for B side, tip at column8 has B vertical line rows4-8 col8 B. Also there are horizontal branches at top and bottom connecting to tip? At row4, there is also G at col6? Actually row4 shows "G G B B" at cols5-6 G? Wait row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B. So at row4, there is extra G at col6 (one right of tip) and B at col7 (one left of tip) forming a crossing? Actually tip columns are 5 (G) and 8 (B). Row4 has G at col6 (adjacent to tip) and B at col7 (adjacent). Row8 similarly: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." same. Thus pattern: each cell extends a straight line (axon) towards the other, stopping two cells before meeting (gap of two). At the tip, a vertical line (dendrite) extends up and down for 2 cells (maybe length 2). At the top and bottom of that vertical line, there are horizontal "fingers" curling inward: at top row (row4) there is a G at col6 (one step towards other) and B at col7 (one step towards other). At bottom row (row8) same. Thus shape resembles a "U" shape at each tip curling inward but not touching. Now test input: grid size appears 19 rows, 9 columns? Let's count rows: many lines. Provided 19 row ... [12338 chars truncated]
"Two stars on the same galactic arm flare into opposing jets of plasma, each jet widening into an accretion bow shock just before the streams would collide, their radiation fronts curving inward across a narrow void of cold space."
120b: fail
See: Two colored stars aligned on the same arm of the dark galaxy.
Do: Each star fires a jet along the arm toward the other, then the jet flares into a wide perpendicular bow at the leading edge. The bow's wingtips push one step inward. Dark space remains between the two bows.
Grid: Space is black. Each jet and bow glows in its parent star's color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x13? Actually example input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given input lines: first 5 rows of dots, then row with G at column2? Let's map coordinates. Input example: rows 0-9? Let's list: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . G . . . . . . . . . . B Row7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . So grid 10 rows, 13 columns. Two stars: G at (6,1) (row6 col1) and B at (6,12). Same row (arm). Output shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G and B expanding outward? Let's examine output rows. Output rows (10 rows, 13 cols): Row0: all dots Row1: all dots Row2: all dots Row3: all dots Row4: . . . . . G G B B . . . . Row5: . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row6: . G G G G G . . B B B B B Row7: . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row8: . . . . . G G B B . . . . Row9: all dots Interpretation: The two stars fire jets toward each other along row6 (same row). The jets are colored same as star, moving horizontally towards center. Then at leading edge (where they meet?) they flare into a wide perpendicular bow (i.e., vertical? Actually perpendicular to arm, which is horizontal, so bow is vertical). The bow's wingtips push one step inward (i.e., the top and bottom of bow extend one cell inward towards center). Dark space remains between the two bows (i.e., gap). So final shape: two "bow" shapes facing each other with a gap. Let's visualize: For G star left, jet moves rightwards, creating a line of G cells from star to some point? In output row6 has G from col1 to col5 (positions 1-5) inclusive? Actually row6: . G G G G G . . B B B B B. So G occupies cols1-5 (col0 is dot). Star originally at col1, now there is a line of G extending to col5. Similarly B occupies cols7-12? Actually B at col12 originally, now B occupies cols7-12 (col6 dot). So jets extended to meet at center? The meeting point maybe between col5 and col7 (col6). That's the gap (dark space). Then bows: vertical shapes at columns5 and7? Let's see rows4-8 have G and B patterns. At column5 (index5) there is G in rows4,5,6,7,8 forming vertical line of G from row4 to row8 (center row6). Similarly column7 has B vertical line rows4-8. Additionally at rows4 and8, there are extra G at col4? Actually row4: . . . . . G G B B . . . . => G at col5 and col6? Wait row4 col5 is G, col6 is G? Actually row4 shows G G at columns5 and6? Let's index: columns 0-12. Row4: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 B,8 B,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 . So there are two G adjacent at col5 and6, and two B at col7 and8. That suggests the bow flares outward horizontally at top and bottom rows (perpendicular bow). The wingtips push one step inward: meaning at top row of bow (row4) the G extends one extra cell inward (col6) beyond the vertical line (col5). Similarly ... [11667 chars truncated]
"Two ships on the same heading unfurl their yardarms as they close distance, the canvas spreading wide across the beam just before they'd collide, jib tips straining toward each other across the narrow channel of open water."
120b: fail
See: Two colored buoys on the same sea lane in dark water.
Do: Each ship sails along the lane toward the other, then extends wide yardarms perpendicular to the heading near the meeting point. The tips of each yardarm reach one step further inward. A narrow channel of water remains.
Grid: The sea is black. Each ship's rigging is drawn in its hull color.
We need to infer rule. The metaphor: two colored buoys on same sea lane in dark water. Each ship sails along lane toward the other, then extends wide yardarms perpendicular to heading near meeting point. Tips of each yardarm reach one step further inward. A narrow channel of water remains. Sea is black. Each ship's rigging drawn in its hull color. Interpretation: Input has two colored cells (different colors) placed somewhere on same row? In examples, they are on same row? Let's examine. Example1 input: grid 10 rows x13 columns? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count rows: Input lines show 10 rows? Actually they show 10 rows of 13 columns. The colored cells: G at row7 col2 (0-index?) and B at row7 col12? Wait row7 (0-index 6) has " . G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G and B on same row, far apart. Output shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G and B connecting? Let's view output rows: row5 (index4) ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So there is a block of G's and B's near middle. Row6 (index5) ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row7 (index6) ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". Row8 (index7) ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row9 (index8) ". . . . . G G B B . . . .". So pattern looks like two ships moving towards each other horizontally, then extending vertical yardarms (perpendicular) at meeting point, forming a cross shape? Actually they meet at column around 6? Let's map coordinates: columns 0-12. G at col1, B at col12. In output, there is a central region columns 5-7? Let's compute: Row7 (index6) has G from col1 to col5? Actually ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So G's from col1 to col5 (5 cells) and B's from col8 to col12 (5 cells). So they have expanded outward from original positions towards each other, filling contiguous block of their color up to a gap of two columns? The gap columns 6-7 are '.'? Actually row7 shows ". G G G G G . . B B B B B": after G block, there is '.' at col6? Wait index: col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 G; col3 G; col4 G; col5 G; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 B; col9 B; col10 B; col11 B; col12 B. So gap of two '.' columns (6,7). That's the narrow channel of water. Also rows above and below have vertical extensions: column1-5 have G vertical lines? Row5 (index4) ". . . . . G G B B . . . .": G at col5? Actually row5 has G at col5? Let's count: columns 0-4 '.'; col5 G; col6 G; col7 B; col8 B; rest '.' . So there is a 2x2 block of G and B at columns5-6 and 7-8? Row6 (index5) ". . . . . G . . B . . . .": G at col5, B at col7. Row8 (index7) same as row6. Row9 (index8) same as row5. Thus shape resembles two ships moving towards each other horizontally, meeting at central columns (5-8). Then they extend vertical "yardarms" (perpendicular) i.e., vertical lines of each color at the meeting point, extending outward one step further inward (i.e., into the channel). The channel remains narrow (two columns of '.' between the colors). So rule: Given two same-row colored cells of different colors, produce a symmetric pattern: fill contiguous block of each color extending from each ... [11077 chars truncated]
"Two charged terminals on the same trace reach toward each other, each building up a capacitor plate at the point of nearest approach, the plate edges curving inward across the dielectric gap where current cannot flow."
120b: fail
See: Two colored terminals on the same PCB trace, separated by empty board.
Do: Each terminal extends a trace toward the other, then widens into a broad perpendicular plate near the center. The plate's outer edges extend one pad closer. A dielectric gap separates the two plates.
Grid: The board is black. Each terminal's copper is drawn in its marker color.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1: Input grid 10x13? Actually lines count 10? Input shows 10 rows? Let's count: there are 10 rows of input? Actually given 10 rows of input then output 10 rows. Input has G at (row7 col2?) and B at (row7 col12?). Coordinates: rows indexed from 0. Row6 (0-index) has G at col1 and B at col12? Wait row7? Let's map: Input rows: Row0: all . Row1: . Row2: . Row3: . Row4: . Row5: . Row6: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B" So G at col1, B at col12 (0-index). Others empty. Output shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G and B connecting? Let's view output rows: Row0-3 all . Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row9: all . So appears like each terminal (G and B) extends a trace toward each other horizontally and then widens into a plate near center, with a gap between plates. The plates are perpendicular? Actually description: each terminal extends a trace toward the other, then widens into a broad perpendicular plate near the center. The plate's outer edges extend one pad closer. A dielectric gap separates the two plates. Interpretation: Starting from each colored cell, we draw a line (trace) horizontally towards the other colored cell, stopping before meeting? Then at some central region, we create a rectangular plate perpendicular (vertical) maybe? Let's examine pattern: G plate appears as vertical column? In output, G occupies positions forming a plus shape? Let's map coordinates. Let's index columns 0-12. Row4: G at col5,6 ; B at col7,8? Actually row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . .": So G at 5,6; B at 7,8. Row5: G at 5; B at 8. Row6: G at 1-5? Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B": G at 1-5; B at 8-12. Row7: G at5; B at8. Row8: G at5,6; B at7,8. So pattern: central gap between plates: columns 6? Actually G plate occupies columns 1-5 (row6) and also column5 rows4-8. B plate occupies columns8-12 (row6) and column8 rows4-8. So plates are vertical bars (columns) at col5 for G and col8 for B? Wait G vertical bar at col5 rows4-8, plus horizontal bar at row6 columns1-5. That's like a T shape? Actually description: trace extends toward other, then widens into broad perpendicular plate near center. So each terminal draws a horizontal trace from its start to near center, then at near center draws a vertical plate (perpendicular) of width maybe 2? For G, trace from col1 to col5 at row6 (horizontal). Then at column5, vertical plate extends rows4-8 (5 rows). Similarly B trace from col12 to col8 at row6, then vertical plate at col8 rows4-8. Also outer edges extend one pad closer: meaning the plate's outer edges extend one pad closer to the other plate? In output, the plates have outer edges at rows4 and 8 (two rows beyond the central row). That's one pad beyond the trace? Not sure. Example2: Input has R at (row1 col4) and A at (row10 col4). Two terminals vertical aligned same column. Output ... [10655 chars truncated]
"Two river gods stretch their arms along the same canyon, each spreading a crown of tributaries just before their waters would mingle, the outermost streams bending inward across the sacred dry ford neither may cross."
120b: fail
See: Two divine springs colored differently, sharing the same canyon floor in darkness.
Do: Each god's river flows along the canyon toward the other, then fans into a wide crown of streams perpendicular to the flow near the center. The crown's outer streams bend one step inward. A dry ford remains between them.
Grid: The canyon is black. Each god's water is drawn in the color of its spring.
We need to infer rule. The metaphor: two divine springs colored differently, sharing same canyon floor in darkness. Each god's river flows along canyon toward the other, then fans into a wide crown of streams perpendicular to the flow near the center. The crown's outer streams bend one step inward. A dry ford remains between them. Canyon is black (.) . Each god's water is drawn in color of its spring. Interpretation: Input has two colored cells (maybe more) placed somewhere in black grid. They represent sources (springs). Output draws lines (rivers) from each source towards each other along same row or column? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input grid 10 rows x 13 columns? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines show 10 rows? Actually they show 10 rows of 13 columns. The colored cells: G at row7 col2 (0-index? row6 col1) and B at row7 col12 (col12?). So same row, far apart, with black between. Output shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G's from left source to center, and B's from right source to center, meeting at center region where they fan out vertically? Let's examine output rows. I'll map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-12. Input: G at (6,1). B at (6,11). Output: Let's list rows. Row0 all . Row1 all . Row2 all . Row3 all . Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So at row4 col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at (5,5), B at (5,7) Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" => G from col1 to col5? Actually row6 col1 G, col2 G, col3 G, col4 G, col5 G, col6 ., col7 ., col8 B, col9 B, col10 B, col11 B, col12 B. Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at (7,5), B at (7,7) Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." => G at (8,5),(8,6); B at (8,7),(8,8) Row9 all . So pattern: The original row (6) had sources at col1 and col11. In output, they remain at same positions? Row6 col1 G unchanged, col11 B unchanged. Also row6 now has a horizontal line of G from col1 to col5 (including source) and B from col7 to col12 (including source). There's a gap at col6 (center) maybe the "dry ford". Indeed column 6 (0-index) is the middle column between them (since distance 10 columns apart). That column remains empty (.) in row6. Also vertical fan: At rows 4-8, columns around center have G and B forming a crown shape: basically a plus shape? Let's see: At column5 (one left of center) there is vertical line of G from rows4-8 (col5). At column7 (one right of center) vertical line of B from rows4-8 (col7). At rows4 and 8, there are extra G at col6? Actually row4 col6 G (that's center column? Wait col6 is center column). Row4 col6 G, row8 col6 G. Similarly row4 col7 B, row8 col8 B? Let's examine: Row4 col6 G (center column). Row4 col7 B (right of center). Row8 col6 G, col7 B? Row8 col6 G, col7 B? Actually row8 col6 G, col7 B? Row8 line shows ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B. So there is a pair of G at col5-6, B at col7-8. So the crown's outer streams bend one step inward: meaning at top and ... [11248 chars truncated]
"Two dancers glide toward each other along the same line, each sweeping into a grand port de bras at arm's length, fingertips arcing inward across the breath of space the choreographer insists they never close."
120b: fail
See: Two colored dancers poised on the same line of a dark stage.
Do: Each dancer travels along the line toward the other, then extends both arms wide in a perpendicular sweep near the center. Their fingertips curl one step closer. A sliver of empty stage remains between them.
Grid: The stage is black. Each dancer's movement is traced in their costume color.
We need to infer rule from examples. Description: two colored dancers on same line of dark stage. They travel toward each other, then extend arms wide in perpendicular sweep near center. Their fingertips curl one step closer. A sliver of empty stage remains between them. Interpretation: Input has two colored cells on same row? Example1 input: grid 10x13? Actually 10 rows, 13 columns. Input has G at row7 col2? Let's index rows starting 0. Row6 (0-index) has G at col1? Actually line: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at column1, B at column12? Wait there are 13 columns, indices 0-12. G at col1, B at col12. Same row. Output shows pattern: they move towards each other, forming a plus shape? Let's examine output rows around that row. Output row6 (same index) is ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So they expanded horizontally? Actually they created a block of G's from col1 to col5? B's from col8 to col12? There's a gap of two columns (col6-7) maybe empty? Let's map. Row6 output: columns:0 '.';1 G;2 G;3 G;4 G;5 G;6 '.';7 '.';8 B;9 B;10 B;11 B;12 B. So G expanded rightwards to col5 (5 cells total). B expanded leftwards to col8 (5 cells). They left a gap of two '.' between them (col6-7). Also there are vertical arms? Look at rows above and below. Row4 output: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." (row index 4). That's two rows above row6? Actually row4 is two rows above row6 (since rows 0-9). Row4 has G G at col5-6? Wait columns: after 5 '.' then G G then B B then '.' etc. So at row4, G at col5-6, B at col7-8? Actually need count: row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . .". That's 13 columns. So positions: col0-4 '.'; col5 G; col6 G; col7 B; col8 B; col9-12 '.'. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at col5, B at col8. Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." same as row5. Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." same as row4. Thus pattern: a diamond shape? Actually looks like two triangles meeting near center, leaving a gap of one column? The description: dancers move toward each other, then extend arms wide in a perpendicular sweep near the center. Their fingertips curl one step closer. A sliver of empty stage remains between them. Interpretation: Starting positions are two points on same row. They move towards each other (so they approach). Then they extend arms perpendicular (i.e., up and down) near the center, forming a cross shape? The fingertips curl one step closer (so the arms' ends are one cell away from each other, leaving a sliver). So final shape is like two triangles pointing towards each other with a gap of one column? In example1, the gap is two columns (col6-7). But maybe the "sliver" is one column of empty cells? Actually there are two '.' columns. But maybe because each dancer's arms are width 2? Let's compute distances. Original distance between G at col1 and B at col12 = 11 columns apart (excluding endpoints). They move towards each other: maybe they meet at center column? The final central gap maybe 2 columns? Let's compute final positions: G's rightmost co ... [10889 chars truncated]
"Two magma plumes rise along the same rift, each spreading into a broad sill of molten rock just below the surface, the sill margins creeping inward across a thin septum of unmelted crust."
120b: fail
See: Two colored hotspots on the same fault line in dark bedrock.
Do: Each plume extends along the rift toward the other, then spreads into a wide perpendicular sill near the center. The sill's outer edges intrude one layer closer. A thin wall of solid rock separates the two intrusions.
Grid: The bedrock is black. Each intrusion glows in its hotspot's color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x13? Actually example input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given input lines: first 5 rows of all dots, then row with G at column2? Let's map coordinates. Input example: rows 0-9? Let's list: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . G . . . . . . . . . . B Row7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . So grid 10 rows, 13 columns. Two hotspots: G at (6,1) (row6 col1) and B at (6,12). Output shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G's extending leftwards? Actually output rows show central region with G and B forming shapes. Let's examine output rows (10 rows, 13 cols): Row0: all dots Row1: all dots Row2: all dots Row3: all dots Row4: . . . . . G G B B . . . . Row5: . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row6: . G G G G G . . B B B B B Row7: . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row8: . . . . . G G B B . . . . Row9: all dots Interpretation: The two hotspots are on same row (row6) with distance. The rule: create a "plume" extending towards each other along the row (horizontal) from each hotspot, filling with its color, until they meet? In output, row6 has G's from col1 to col5 (including original at col1) and B's from col7 to col12 (original at col12). There's a gap at col6 (index?) Actually row6 col6 is '.' (since after G's there is '.' then B's start at col7). So they stop one cell before each other, leaving a thin wall of black (dot) separating. Also there is a perpendicular "sill" near the center: a vertical column of each color extending up and down from the meeting region? Let's see: column5? Actually central region maybe at columns5-7? Let's map coordinates: columns 0-12. Row6: G at col1-5 (5 cells), dot at col6, B at col7-12 (6 cells). So the "center" is between col5 and col7 with a dot at col6. Now vertical extensions: At column5 (the last G column) there is vertical line of G extending up and down: rows4-8 have G at col5? Let's check output rows: Row4: col5 G, col6 G? Actually row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So row4 col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B. So row4 has G at col5 and col6? Wait col6 is also G? row4 col6 G (makes sense). Row4 col7 B, col8 B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at col5, B at col7. Row6: as above. Row7: same as row5. Row8: same as row4. Thus we have a 3x3 block centered at rows6, cols5-7? Actually shape: a 3x3 block of G and B forming a square? Let's view coordinates: Rows4-8, cols5-8 maybe. Let's list grid with coordinates: Row4: col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B Row5: col5 G, col6 ., col7 B, col8 . Row6: col5 G, col6 ., col7 B, col8 . Wait row6 col8? Actually row6 col8 is B? Row6 has B from col7 to col12, so col8 B yes. Row6 col6 is '.'. Row7: same as row5. Row8: same as row4. Thus we have a "sill" shape: a 2x2 block of G G on left side ... [10893 chars truncated]
"Two pats of butter on a warm skillet begin to melt toward one another, each spreading a slick tongue along the pan before pooling into a wide puddle-edge that drips inward, almost merging but kept apart by a thin dry strip."
120b: fail
See: Two dabs of different-colored sauce on an otherwise clean plate, sitting on the same line.
Do: Each dab melts along the shared line toward the other, then spreads sideways into a broad front at the leading edge, with the corners curling forward. A narrow dry gap remains between them.
Grid: The plate is black. Each sauce keeps its own color as it spreads.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has two colored cells G and B on same row? Let's examine example1 input grid size? appears 10 rows, 13 columns? Actually lines: first 10 rows? Let's count: Input shows 10 rows? Wait list: rows from . . . . . . . . . . . . . repeated 5 rows then row with G and B at positions? Let's index columns 0-12. Row6 (0-index) has ". G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at col1, B at col12? Actually there are 13 columns, positions: col0 '.' col1 'G' col2 '.' ... col11 '.' col12 'B'. So they are on same row, far apart. Output shows a pattern: a "bridge" of G and B spreading towards each other, meeting with a gap. Looks like each color expands outward in a diamond shape? Let's visualize output rows (10 rows). Row0 all dots. Row1 all dots. Row2 all dots. Row3 all dots. Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So at row4 (two rows above original row6?), there is a block of two G then two B adjacent with a gap? Actually pattern: positions col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row9 all dots. So shape looks like each color expands in a "cone" towards each other, meeting with a narrow gap (one column?) Actually at row6 (original row), G occupies cols1-5? Let's see: row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So G from col1 to col5 inclusive (5 cells). B from col9 to col13? Wait col13 out of range (max 12). Actually B from col9 to col13? Let's count: columns 0-12. Row6: col0 '.' col1 'G' col2 'G' col3 'G' col4 'G' col5 'G' col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 'B' col9 'B' col10 'B' col11 'B' col12 'B'. So B from col8 to col12 (5 cells). Gap of two '.' at col6-7. Thus each color spreads outward horizontally and also vertically forming a diamond shape (Manhattan distance). The original points are at row6 col1 and col12. The spread seems to be limited to a certain radius? The shape appears to be a diamond of radius 5? Let's compute Manhattan distance from original G at (6,1). At row6 same row distance 0 -> original cell. At row5 (one up) we have G at col5? Actually row5 has G at col5 only? Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." So G at col5 (distance 4 horizontally from original col1, vertical -1). Manhattan distance = 5. So shape includes cells where Manhattan distance <=5? Let's test: For row4 (two up), G at col5 and col6? Row4 has G at col5 and col6? Actually row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So G at col5 and col6 (col5 distance 4, col6 distance 5). Row3 (three up) none. So shape limited to rows within 2 of original? Wait original row6, we have rows 4-8 showing shape. That's vertical distance up to 2. So radius maybe 2? But horizontal spread up to 5. So shape is like each color expands along line towards each other (horizontal) and also spreads sideways at leading edge forming a "broad front" with corners curling forward. That description matches: they melt along shared line (horizontal) toward each other, then spread sideways at ... [12255 chars truncated]
"Two soloists at opposite ends of the stage play toward each other, their sound swelling into broad chords just before the notes collide in the resonant silence between them."
120b: fail
See: Two lone notes placed on the same staff line, separated by empty measures.
Do: Each note sends a melodic run along the staff toward the other, then blooms into a wide chord at the end of its run, with the outer chord tones bending one step closer. A rest hangs between the two chords.
Grid: The staff is silent (black). Each voice keeps its own tonal color.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1: Input grid 10 rows x13 columns? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines: 10 rows? Actually list shows 10 rows. Output also 10 rows. Input has G at row7 col2? Let's index rows starting 0 top. Input row6 (0-index) has G at col1? Actually line: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B" That's row6 (7th row). So G at column1, B at column12? Wait columns count 13. So G at col1, B at col12. Output shows pattern: a diagonal line of G and B spreading outward forming a shape like two triangles meeting? Let's examine output rows. Row0 all dots. Row1 all dots. Row2 all dots. Row3 all dots. Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." Row9 all dots. So pattern: Starting from original G and B positions, they each expand outward horizontally and vertically forming a plus shape? Actually G forms a cross shape centered at original G? Original G at (6,1). In output, there is a vertical line of G from row4 to row8 at column5? Wait need coordinates. Let's map coordinates: columns 0-12. Row6 (original row) output: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" So G occupies columns1-5? Actually positions: col0 '.'; col1 'G'; col2 'G'; col3 'G'; col4 'G'; col5 'G'; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 'B'; col9 'B'; col10 'B'; col11 'B'; col12 'B'. Original G at col1 row6 matches leftmost G of that line. Original B at col12 row6 matches rightmost B. Rows above and below have G and B forming a diamond shape? Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . .": G at col5, B at col8? Wait row5 col5 G, col8 B. Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . .": G at col5,6; B at col7,8. Row8 similar. So seems each note sends a run toward the other along the staff (horizontal line) and then blooms into a wide chord at the end, with outer chord tones bending one step closer. The rest (empty measures) between chords becomes a rest (maybe black). So basically we take two colored cells on same row, separated horizontally. We draw a line of that color from each towards the other, meeting at middle? Then at the meeting point we create a block (chord) of both colors? Let's analyze. Original positions: G at col1, B at col12, same row (row6). Distance = 11 columns apart. In output, there is a horizontal line of G from col1 to col5? Actually G extends to col5 (col1-5). B extends from col8-12 (col8-12). Gap between them columns6-7? Actually row6 has '.' at col6-7. So they didn't meet; they left a gap of two columns (6,7). In rows above and below, the gap shrinks? Row5 has G at col5, B at col8, gap col6-7 '.'? Actually row5: G at col5, B at col8, gap col6-7 '.' (two columns). Row4: G at col5-6, B at col7-8, gap zero? Actually they are adjacent: G at col6, B at col7 adjacent. So chord formed at row4? Row4 has G G B B adjacent pairs. Similarly row8 symmetrical. Thus pattern: Starting from original positions, we draw diagonal lines upward and downward toward each other, fo ... [11629 chars truncated]
"Two rugby players charge down the same lane, each diving into a spread-eagle tackle just before they meet, arms flung wide and fingertips almost interlocking across the narrow no-man's-land."
120b: k=2
See: Two players positioned on the same track line, separated by open field.
Do: Each sprints toward the other along the line, then throws out a wide lateral lunge at the end, with the tips of the lunge curling one step inward. They stop just short of contact.
Grid: The pitch is black. Each player's motion trail is drawn in their jersey color.
We need to infer rule. From description: two players on same track line separated by open field. They sprint toward each other along the line, then throw out a wide lateral lunge at the end, with tips curling one step inward. They stop just short of contact. Grid black background. Each player's motion trail drawn in their jersey color. Interpretation: Input has two colored cells (players) on same row? In example1 input: there is G at (row6,col1?) Let's index rows 0-9? Actually grid 10 rows? Input example1 shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given 10 rows of 13 columns? Let's count: Input lines: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." (13). Then many rows, total 10 rows? Let's count: lines after that: row1 to row9? Actually they show 10 rows (0-9). The G is at row6 (0-index) column1? B at row6 column12? So they are on same row, far apart. Output shows a pattern: a line of G and B moving towards each other, forming a shape like a "track" with lateral lunge at ends. Specifically output rows show a diamond shape? Let's visualize: output rows 0-9 same size. Row4 (index4) has " . . . . . . G G B B . . . ." So two blocks of G and B adjacent? Row5: " . . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: " . G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row7: " . . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row8: " . . . . . G G B B . . . ." Looks like they moved towards each other along row6 (original row) and also created vertical column of G and B moving up/down? Actually they form a plus shape? Let's think: The players start at positions (6,1) G and (6,12) B. They sprint towards each other along the row, leaving trail of their color. They stop just short of contact: maybe they stop when one cell apart? In output, the central region where they meet: there is a block of G and B adjacent but not overlapping. At row6, we have G's from col1-5? Actually row6 output: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So G occupies columns1-5 (5 cells) and B occupies columns8-12 (5 cells). There's a gap of two columns (col6,7) empty? Actually there is ". ."? Yes columns6-7 are '.' . So they stopped with a gap of two cells? The original distance between them was 11 columns apart (col1 vs col12). They moved inward maybe 5 steps each, leaving 2 gap. Also lateral lunge: At ends of their movement, they throw out a wide lateral lunge with tips curling one step inward. That could create the vertical arms seen at rows4-8 columns? For G side, there is a vertical column of G at column? In output rows4-8 column5? Let's map coordinates: Row4 has G G at columns5-6? Actually row4: ". . . . . . G G B B . . . ." So G at col6-7? Wait count: columns start 0. Row4: positions: 0 '.' 1 '.' 2 '.' 3 '.' 4 '.' 5 '.' 6 'G' 7 'G' 8 'B' 9 'B' 10 '.' 11 '.' 12 '.'. So G at col6-7, B at col8-9. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at col5, B at col8. Row6: G at col1-5, B at col8-12. Row7: same as row5. Row8: same as row4. Thus shape is like a diamond/lunge outward from the central row: at rows above and below, the G and B blocks are n ... [11290 chars truncated]
"Two storm fronts approach along the same pressure ridge, each unfurling a broad squall line as they near the point of collision, their flanking rain bands curving inward across a thin dry eye."
120b: fail
See: Two pressure points on the same isobar, separated by calm air.
Do: Each front advances along the ridge toward the other, then broadens into a perpendicular squall line near the middle. The ends of each squall line push one step closer, framing a narrow gap of still air.
Grid: Clear sky is black. Each front is colored by its air mass.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with black '.' background. Two "pressure points" on same isobar separated by calm air. Each front advances along ridge toward the other, then broadens into a perpendicular squall line near the middle. Ends push one step closer, framing narrow gap. Interpretation: Input has two colored cells (maybe of different colors) placed somewhere. Output draws a shape connecting them: a thick line (like a plus shape) connecting them horizontally? Let's examine Example1. Input: grid 10 rows x 13 columns? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines show 10 rows? Actually there are 10 rows of 13 columns. In input, there is a G at row7 col2 (0-index?) and B at row7 col12? Let's index rows starting 0. Row6 (0-index) has " . G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at column1, B at column12. So two points on same row, separated by many '.'. Output: shows a shape: a thick horizontal band connecting them with some vertical extensions forming a rectangle? Let's view output rows (10 rows). Row4 (index4) has ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So at columns5? Actually need coordinates. Let's map. Let's reconstruct grid coordinates. Input width 13. Output also 13. Let's write coordinates: columns 0-12. Input: G at (row6, col1). B at (row6, col12). So same row. Output: Let's list each row: Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: all . Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." => columns5? Actually there are 5 leading '.' then G G B B then rest '.' . So G at col5, G at col6, B at col7, B at col8. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at col5, B at col7. Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" => G at col1-5? Actually start ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So col1 G, col2 G, col3 G, col4 G, col5 G, col6 '.'? Wait there is ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So after 5 G's, there is '.' at col6, '.' at col7? Actually there are two '.' after G's before B's. So B's start at col8? Let's count: col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 G; col3 G; col4 G; col5 G; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 B; col9 B; col10 B; col11 B; col12 B. Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." => G at col5, B at col7. Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." => G at col5,6; B at col7,8. Row9: all . So shape looks like a thick "X"? Actually it's like a rectangle connecting the two points with a central vertical line? Let's visualize: The two points originally at (6,1) G and (6,12) B. Output shows a thick band connecting them horizontally across row6 from col1 to col5 G, then gap, then B from col8 to col12. Also there is a vertical column of G at col5 rows4-8, and vertical column of B at col8 rows4-8. And also a central 2x2 block of G and B overlapping? Actually rows4-8 have G G and B B at columns5-8 forming a 5x5 square? Let's map region columns5-8 rows4-8: Rows4: col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B Row5: col5 G, col6 ., col7 B, col8 . Row6: col5 G, col6 ., col7 ., col8 B Row7: col5 G, col6 ., col7 B, col8 . Row8: col5 G, col6 G, col7 B, col8 B So shape is like two fronts (G and B) mo ... [12069 chars truncated]
"Two flying buttresses spring from opposite walls along the same axis, each arching out into a broad stone fan vault just before meeting, their carved finials reaching across the keystone gap that holds the cathedral together."
120b: fail
See: Two foundation stones set on the same beam line in an empty blueprint.
Do: Each stone projects a buttress arm along the beam toward the other, flaring into a wide vault at the tip. The vault's outermost ribs extend one course inward. A narrow void remains at the center.
Grid: The blueprint background is black. Each buttress is rendered in its foundation stone's color.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with black background '.' and two "foundation stones" placed on same "beam line" (same row? column?). In example1 input: grid size? appears 10 rows? Actually input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Input shows rows 1-10? Actually example1 input lines: first 5 rows all dots, row6 all dots, row7: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B" (so G at column2, B at column12). Then rows8-10 all dots. So grid 10 rows, 13 columns? Let's count columns: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B" that's 13 entries (including leading dot). So grid 10x13. Output shows pattern: a shape connecting G and B with arms and vault etc. Let's examine output rows (10 rows). Row5: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." (row index 5). Row6: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row7: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" Row8: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So shape looks like two buttresses from each stone extending towards each other, forming a "vault" at meeting point with a hollow center (narrow void). Essentially like a rectangle with thick edges? Let's map coordinates: G at (row7, col2). B at (row7, col13). Output adds many G cells extending rightwards from G, and B cells extending leftwards from B, forming a shape that meets in middle with a 2x? void. Specifically, G cells occupy columns 2-6? Row7 has G from col2 to col6 (5 cells). Row5 has G at col6? Actually row5 has G at col6? Row5: positions: col6 G, col7 G? Wait row5: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So col6 G, col7 G, col8 B, col9 B. So G extends to col7, B starts at col8. Row9 similar. Row6 and Row8 have single G at col6? Actually row6: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." So G at col6, B at col9? Wait B at col9? Row6: after G there are two dots then B at col9? Let's count: columns: 1 dot,2 dot,3 dot,4 dot,5 dot,6 G,7 dot,8 dot,9 B,10 dot... So B at col9. Row8 same. Row7 has B from col9 to col13? Actually row7: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So B from col9 to col13 (5 cells). So shape is like two triangles? Actually looks like a "buttress" shape: each stone projects an arm (a line) towards the other, flaring into a wide vault at tip (like a triangle). The outermost ribs extend one course inward (so the outermost edges of the vault go one cell inward). A narrow void remains at the center (the space between the two vaults). So overall shape is like two pyramids meeting with a 1-cell gap. Thus rule: Given two colored cells on same row (or column?) they are foundation stones. Output draws a shape: For each stone, draw a "buttress" extending towards the other stone: a vertical line? In example, they are on same row, and shape extends vertically up and down from that row, forming a triangle pointing towards the other stone. The "arm" is a vertical line of the stone's color at the column of the stone? Actually look: G column is 2. In output, G appears at column2 row7 (original), plus column2 rows? Actually there are no G above row7 except row5? Wait row5 has G at col6 and 7, not colum ... [11189 chars truncated]
"Two siege towers roll toward each other along the same rampart, each lowering a wide drawbridge at the last moment, the bridge planks overlapping the void but never quite meeting across the burning moat."
120b: fail
See: Two colored banners planted on the same wall line, with empty battlements between them.
Do: Each tower advances along the wall toward the other, then drops a broad crosspiece perpendicular to the wall at its forward position. The edges of each crosspiece extend one step further inward. A fiery gap separates them.
Grid: The battlefield is black. Each army's structures are in its banner color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x13? Actually example input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given input lines: first 5 rows of all dots, then row with G at column2? Let's map coordinates. Input example: rows 0-9? Let's list: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: same Row2: same Row3: same Row4: same Row5: same Row6: . G . . . . . . . . . . B Row7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . So grid 10 rows, 13 columns. Two colored cells: G at (row6,col1) (0-index) and B at (row6,col12). So they are on same row, with empty between. Output grid 10x13 shown. Let's examine output pattern: appears like cross shapes extending outward? Let's visualize. Output rows: 0: all dots 1: all dots 2: all dots 3: all dots 4: . . . . . G G B B . . . . 5: . . . . . G . . B . . . . 6: . G G G G G . . B B B B B 7: . . . . . G . . B . . . . 8: . . . . . G G B B . . . . 9: all dots So pattern: a plus shape? The original G and B were at row6 col1 and col12. In output, there is a horizontal line of G's from col1 to col5? Actually row6 has G from col1 to col5 (positions 1-5) and B from col7? Wait row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". Let's index columns 0-12. Row6 col0 '.'; col1 G; col2 G; col3 G; col4 G; col5 G; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 B; col9 B; col10 B; col11 B; col12 B. So G line extends rightwards from original G at col1 to col5 (4 steps). B line extends leftwards from original B at col12 to col8 (4 steps). So each "tower" moves towards each other? Actually they advance along the wall (row) toward each other, then drop a crosspiece perpendicular (vertical) at its forward position, edges extend one step further inward (i.e., towards center). The gap between them is "fiery" maybe left empty. Thus rule: For each colored cell (banner) on same row, we create a horizontal line from original position towards the other banner, stopping one cell before meeting? In example, distance between original positions: col12 - col1 = 11 cells apart. They each advance towards each other until they are adjacent? In output, the forward positions are at col5 (G) and col8 (B) leaving a gap of columns 6-7? Actually there is '.' at col6 and col7 between them. So they stopped with a gap of 2 columns (maybe the "fiery gap"). The crosspiece vertical extends one step further inward from each forward position: meaning at column5 (G forward), vertical line of G extends up and down one cell? Let's check: column5 has G at rows4,5,6,7,8? Actually column5 (0-index) corresponds to 6th column. In output, row4 col5 G, row5 col5 G, row6 col5 G, row7 col5 G, row8 col5 G. That's a vertical line of G from rows4-8 (5 cells). Similarly column8 (B forward) has B at rows4-8. Indeed row4 col8 B, row5 col8 B, row6 col8 B, row7 col8 B, row8 col8 B. So crosspiece is vertical line of length 5 centered at row6 (original row) extending 2 up and 2 down (since grid height 10). So edges extend one step further inward? Actuall ... [11075 chars truncated]
"Two spotlight beams slide along the same catwalk from opposite wings, each widening into a dramatic fan of light just before center stage, their outermost rays curling inward across the dark sliver where no light falls."
120b: fail
See: Two colored spots resting on the same rigging bar in a dark theater.
Do: Each spot glides along the bar toward the other, then opens into a wide perpendicular wash near the middle. The edges of each wash bend one step inward. A thin dark seam stays unlit between them.
Grid: The stage is black. Each beam keeps its gel color.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x13? Actually example input shows 10 rows? Let's count: lines: there are 10 rows? Actually given input lines: first 5 rows of dots, then row with G at col2? Let's map coordinates. Input example: rows 0-9? Let's count lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . G . . . . . . . . . . B 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . So 10 rows, 13 columns. Two colored spots: G at (row6, col1?) zero-index? Actually row7 (index6) column2 (index1). B at same row, column13 (index12). They are on same "rigging bar" meaning same row. They glide toward each other, then open into wide perpendicular wash near middle. The edges of each wash bend one step inward. A thin dark seam stays unlit between them. Output grid shows a pattern: a horizontal line of G and B spreading outward? Let's view output rows (10 rows, 13 cols). Row5 (index4) has . . . . . G G B B . . . . So at row4 (0-index) there are two G adjacent then two B adjacent. Row6 (index5) . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row7 (index6) . G G G G G . . B B B B B Row8 (index7) . . . . . G . . B . . . . Row9 (index8) . . . . . G G B B . . . . So pattern forms a plus shape? Actually looks like a vertical bar of G and B centered at column? Let's locate columns: In row6 (index5) G at col5 (index4). B at col9 (index8). Row7 (index6) G from col2 to col6 (indexes1-5) and B from col9 to col13 (indexes8-12). So they expanded outward horizontally from original spots towards each other, meeting near middle, then also vertical expansion? The description: each spot glides along the bar toward the other, then opens into a wide perpendicular wash near the middle. The edges of each wash bend one step inward. A thin dark seam stays unlit between them. Interpretation: Starting positions are two colored cells on same row. They move towards each other until they meet? In output, they have created a shape: a "wash" perpendicular (vertical) near middle? Actually the wash is perpendicular to bar (horizontal), so vertical bars of each color emanating from near middle? Let's examine: For G, vertical column at col5? Actually G appears in rows 4-8 (indexes4-8) at column5 (index4) and also a horizontal line at row7 (index6) from col2-6. So shape is like a plus sign (cross) for each color? For G, a plus centered at (row7, col5). Similarly B plus centered at (row7, col9). The plus arms length: vertical arms length 2 up/down from center (rows5-9). Horizontal arms length 2 left/right from center (col7-11?). Wait B plus: horizontal line at row7 from col9 to col13 (5 cells). vertical line at col9 rows5-9. Thus each original spot moved towards each other until they are 4 columns apart? Original G at col2, B at col13. They moved to new centers at col5 and col9 (distance 4). They each expanded into plus shape of size 5 (center ... [11886 chars truncated]
"Two vines planted on the same trellis wire grow toward each other, each bursting into a broad fan of tendrils just before they meet, the outermost tendrils curling inward across the gap where neither root can claim the soil."
120b: fail
See: Two colored seeds planted on the same row of dark earth.
Do: Each vine grows along the wire toward the other, then spreads a wide tendril fan perpendicular to the wire near the midpoint. The fan's outer tips extend one node closer. A bare patch of soil remains between them.
Grid: The earth is black. Each vine grows in the color of its seed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has two seeds G and B on same row (row 6? zero-index?). In example input grid 10 rows? Actually given 10 rows? Let's count: Input lines show 10 rows? Actually they show 10 rows of 13 columns. The seeds at row 6 (0-index?) line: ". G . . . . . . . . . . B". So G at column1, B at column12? Actually columns: positions: index0 '.'; index1 'G'; then many '.'; last column index12 'B'. So seeds on same row, far apart. Output shows vines growing towards each other along row (horizontal) and also vertical fan near midpoint. Let's examine output rows. Output grid same size 10x13. Row indices 0-9. Row0 all '.'. Row1 all '.'. Row2 all '.'. Row3 all '.'. Row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So at row4 (two rows above seed row?), there is a segment of G's and B's near middle: G G then B B. Row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." Row6: ". G G G G G . . B B B B B" This is the seed row? Actually original seed row was row6 (0-index). Output row6 shows G's extending from seed G at col1 to right up to col5? Actually pattern: col1 G (seed), then G at col2-5 (four more) making a line of G's from col1 to col5. Then '.' at col6? Actually after G's there is '.' at col6? The output shows ". G G G G G . . B B B B B". So after col5 G, col6 '.'? col7 '.'? Then B's from col8 to col12 (5 B's). So B line extends leftwards from seed B at col12 to col8. Thus vines grew horizontally towards each other, stopping one cell apart? Actually there is a gap of two '.' between G line and B line? Let's see: G line ends at col5, B line starts at col8, so columns 6 and7 are '.' (two cells gap). That's the "bare patch of soil remains between them." Now also vertical fans: At rows 4,5,7,8 there are G and B patterns forming a fan shape near midpoint. The midpoint between seeds is roughly column (1+12)/2 = 6.5, so middle columns 6-7. The fan appears centered around column6-7? Let's examine row5: G at col5? Actually row5: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." So G at col5, B at col8. Row4: G at col5? row4: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." So G at col5 and col6? Actually columns: index0 '.';1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 'G';6 'G';7 'B';8 'B'; rest '.' So G at col5,6; B at col7,8. Row7: ". . . . . G . . B . . . ." same as row5. Row8: ". . . . . G G B B . . . ." same as row4. Thus fan shape: a diamond of width 2 at rows 4 and 8, and width 1 at rows5 and7, with center row6 having full lines. Interpretation: The vines grow horizontally, and also grow vertically outward from the midpoint, forming a plus shape? Actually they spread a wide tendril fan perpendicular to the wire near the midpoint. The fan's outer tips extend one node closer. So near midpoint, they create a perpendicular fan (vertical) that extends outward one node beyond the horizontal line? In output, the vertical fan extends two rows above and below the seed row (row6). At those rows, the G and B colors appear near the midpoint columns. Specifically, the fan is like a 2x2 block of G and B at rows 4 and 8, and a ... [10391 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has an orange (O) background containing one or more connected components (4-connected) made of magenta (M) cells. Scattered across the grid are single cells of other non-orange, non-magenta colors (e.g., yellow, blue, green, azure, maroon, grey). Each of these colored cells may or may not be 4-adjacent (sharing an edge) to a magenta connected component.
Do: 1. Identify every connected component of magenta (M) cells using 4-connectivity (up, down, left, right). 2. For each non-orange, non-magenta colored cell in the grid, check whether it is 4-adjacent to any cell belonging to a magenta connected component. 3. If the colored cell is adjacent to a magenta component, replace every magenta cell in that component with the colored cell's color. Then replace the colored cell itself with orange (O). 4. If the colored cell is NOT adjacent to any magenta component, simply replace it with orange (O) — it disappears. 5. Any magenta component that has no adjacent colored marker remains magenta. 6. The result is the transformed grid.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The background color is orange (O). All non-orange, non-magenta marker cells from the input are removed (set to orange). Magenta shapes that were painted are replaced entirely by the color of their adjacent marker; unpainted magenta shapes remain as magenta.
"A single drop of dye falls into water and stains whatever clay sculpture it touches."
120b: k=1
See: An orange lake stretches across the grid. Rising from the water are sculptures made of magenta clay, their cells fused together in connected formations. Floating on the surface nearby are single droplets of vivid color — green, yellow, blue — each one a potent dye waiting to be absorbed.
Do: Each dye droplet reaches out to whatever it touches. If a droplet is brushing against a clay sculpture, the sculpture drinks in the color completely — every cell of connected clay transforms to match the dye. The droplet, spent, dissolves back into the orange water and vanishes. Droplets that float alone, touching no sculpture, simply sink and disappear without a trace. Any sculpture that no droplet touched remains its original magenta clay.
Grid: The lake remains the same size. The orange water fills every space it did before. All the little dye droplets are gone — absorbed or dissolved. Where magenta sculptures once stood, you may now see shapes dyed a new color, or sculptures still wearing their original magenta if no dye ever reached them.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5? Actually example 1 input 5x5. Let's map. Input: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Interpretation: O = orange water (lake). M = magenta clay sculptures. G,Y are droplets (green, yellow). Possibly also other colors but only G,Y present. Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Observations: Original orange O remain same except where changed? In output, many O turned into other colors (G,Y) where M were replaced. Let's see mapping. Identify connected components of M (magenta). Need to see which are adjacent (4-direction?). Let's label coordinates (r,c). Input M positions: (1,2),(1,3) adjacent horizontally -> component A size2. (1,4) is G droplet. (2,4) Y droplet. (3,4) M at (3,4) isolated? Adjacent to (4,4) M? Actually (4,4) M, (4,5) M, (4,3) M, (5,4) M. So there is a larger component B of M's at rows 3-5 columns 3-5 maybe. List M positions: (1,2),(1,3) (3,4) (4,3),(4,4),(4,5) (5,4) These are connected? (3,4) adjacent to (4,4) vertically, so part of same component as lower block. Also (4,3) adjacent to (4,4) etc. So component B includes (3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). That's 5 cells. Component A is (1,2),(1,3) size2. Now droplets: G at (1,4) adjacent to M? It touches (1,3) left neighbor which is M component A. So G droplet touches component A. According to description, droplet reaches out to whatever it touches; if brushing against a clay sculpture, the sculpture drinks in the color completely — every cell of connected clay transforms to match the dye. Droplet disappears. So component A should become all G. Indeed output rows: (1,2) becomes G, (1,3) becomes G. Yes. Droplet Y at (2,4) touches which M? Adjacent to (3,4) below which is part of component B. So Y should recolor component B to Y. Output shows component B cells become Y: positions (3,4) Y, (4,3) Y, (4,4) Y, (4,5) Y, (5,4) Y. Indeed output matches. All other cells become O (orange) unchanged. Droplets themselves disappear (become O). Indeed (1,4) G droplet becomes O in output? Row1 col4 originally G, output row1 col4 O. Yes. (2,4) Y droplet becomes O. Good. Thus rule: Identify each connected component of M (magenta). If any droplet (any non-O, non-M) of a particular color is orthogonally adjacent to any cell of that component, then recolor entire component to that droplet's color. If multiple droplets of different colors touch same component? Not seen. Probably not happen. If multiple droplets same component maybe same color anyway. If component not touched by any droplet, remains M? In description says remains original magenta. But in output, there were no untouched M. So rule. Also droplets that are not adjacent to any M become O (disappear). So they vanish. Now apply to test input grid (7x7). Let's parse. Rows: 1: Y O M O O O X 2: M M M O O O O 3: O O M O B O O 4: O O O O M M O 5: O O O O M M O 6: M M A O O O O 7: O M O O ... [5170 chars truncated]
"A virus touches a host organism and rewrites its entire DNA, then disintegrates. Organisms never contacted by any pathogen remain unchanged. Free-floating viruses with no host simply decay."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A warm habitat with clay-colored organisms and scattered microbes of various strains.
Do: Each microbe that physically contacts an organism infects it completely, recoloring every cell of the organism to match the microbe's strain. The infecting microbe is consumed in the process. Microbes that touch nothing simply dissolve. Uninfected organisms persist.
Grid: Same dimensions. Background is orange. Infected organisms display the color of their infecting microbe. Uninfected organisms remain magenta. All lone microbes are gone.
"A comet grazes a nebula and its trail paints every particle of the cloud in the comet's spectral hue, while the comet itself burns away."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A warm void with nebula formations and lone comets of various spectral colors.
Do: A comet touching a nebula recolors the entire connected gas cloud to match its spectrum. The comet is consumed. Comets that pass through empty space simply fade. Untouched nebulae keep their original glow.
Grid: Same void. Background is the amber cosmos. Painted nebulae display the comet's color. Untouched nebulae remain magenta. No comets survive.
"A flare tossed against the hull of a ghost ship illuminates every plank in its color, and the flare sinks beneath the waves."
120b: k=2
See: A warm sea with drifting vessel wreckage and individual signal flares of different colors.
Do: A flare touching a vessel lights up the whole connected hull in the flare's color. The flare is extinguished. Flares in open water fizzle out. Ships no flare reaches keep their ghostly appearance.
Grid: Same sea. Background is the amber ocean. Illuminated ships show the flare's color. Unlit ships remain magenta. All flares are gone.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: O=orange (background sea), M=magenta (unlit ship hull?), G=green, Y=yellow, B=blue, etc. The metaphor: flares of different colors, vessels (ships) are magenta? In description: "All flares are gone. Ships no flare reaches keep their ghostly appearance." Ghostly appearance likely magenta (M). Flare touching a vessel lights up whole connected hull in flare's color. Flare extinguished. Flares in open water fizzle out (disappear). So input grid contains flares (colored cells other than O and M?) and ship hulls (magenta M). Output: ship hulls that are connected to a flare become that flare's color (maybe propagate through connected M region). Flare cells themselves disappear (become O? maybe become background). In output, flares are gone (replaced by O?). Let's test. Example1 Input grid 5x5: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Interpretation: M are ship hull cells. G and Y are flares? G at (1,4) (row1 col4). Y at (2,4). Also there is M at (1,2),(1,3) etc. Output grid: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Observations: The original M cells have been replaced: some become G, some become Y, some become O (background). The flares G and Y have disappeared? In output, there is no G at original location (1,4) becomes O? Actually output row1 col4 is O (since row1: O G G O O). Wait row1 col2 is G, col3 is G. So original M at (1,2) and (1,3) turned into G. That suggests the G flare at (1,4) lit up connected hull (M) to its left? Let's see connectivity: M cells are adjacent orthogonally? The ship hull likely consists of connected M cells (maybe 4-direction). In input, M cells positions: (1,2),(1,3) (3,4) (4,3),(4,4),(4,5) (5,4) Also there is M at (3,4) (row3 col4). That's separate? Let's map connectivity: Are (1,2)-(1,3) adjacent to each other, but not to others. (3,4) is isolated? (4,3)-(4,4)-(4,5) are connected line, and (5,4) adjacent to (4,4). So there are three ship components: component A: (1,2)-(1,3). component B: (3,4). component C: (4,3)-(4,4)-(4,5)-(5,4). Now flares: G at (1,4) adjacent to component A? (1,4) is next to (1,3) horizontally, so touches component A. Y at (2,4) adjacent to component B (3,4) vertically? Actually (2,4) is above (3,4) so touches component B. Also Y maybe also touches component C? (2,4) is also above (3,4) which is part of component C? Wait component C includes (4,4) etc, not (3,4). So Y touches component B only. Output: component A turned to G (both cells). Indeed row1 col2,3 become G. component B turned to Y (row3 col4 becomes Y). component C turned to Y as well? Output rows 4 and 5 show Y's: row4 col3-5 become Y, row5 col4 Y. Yes component C turned to Y, even though Y flare was not directly adjacent to those cells? But Y flare at (2,4) is not adjacent to component C (distance 2). However component C is connected to component B via adjacency? Let's see: component B is (3,4) ... [7645 chars truncated]
"A charged capacitor touches one node of a circuit and every connected trace adopts its voltage color — then the capacitor is spent."
120b: k=1
See: A warm circuit board with trace networks and scattered charged capacitors of various voltage colors.
Do: A capacitor adjacent to a trace network energizes the whole connected path in its voltage color. The capacitor discharges and vanishes. Capacitors near no trace simply drain. Unenergized traces keep their default state.
Grid: Same board. Background is the substrate. Energized traces display the capacitor's color. Unenergized traces remain magenta. No capacitors remain.
We need to infer rule from description and example. Let's parse. We have grid with colors: O (orange), M (magenta), G (green), Y (yellow), B (blue), A (azure), X (grey). The description: "capacitor adjacent to a trace network energizes the whole connected path in its voltage color. The capacitor discharges and vanishes. Capacitors near no trace simply drain. Unenergized traces keep their default state." Interpretation: There are two types of elements: capacitors (colored maybe B,R,G,Y?) and trace networks (magenta default). In description: "Unenergized traces remain magenta." So trace network cells are magenta (M). Capacitors are colored other than M (maybe B,R,G,Y, etc). They are adjacent to trace network (maybe orthogonal adjacency). When a capacitor is adjacent to a trace network, the whole connected component of trace network (connected via orthogonal adjacency) becomes the capacitor's color (voltage). The capacitor disappears (becomes background? maybe becomes empty? In output, there are no capacitors left; they vanish, maybe become background (which is O? Actually background is substrate maybe O? In example, input had O's as background? Let's examine example. Example 1 Input grid 5x5: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Let's map. Input: M cells are trace network. G, Y are capacitors? G at (1,4) (row1 col4). Y at (2,4). Also maybe other colors? Only G and Y besides M and O. O is background. In output: M cells have been replaced by either G or Y depending on adjacency to capacitors. Let's see. Identify trace network components: M cells positions: (1,2),(1,3) (3,4) (4,3),(4,4),(4,5) (5,4) Also (4,2?) Actually row4 col2 is O. So components: Let's see connectivity orthogonal. Component A: (1,2)-(1,3) adjacent horizontally. Are they connected to other M cells? (2,2) is O, (1,4) is G (capacitor). So component A is isolated 2 cells. Component B: (3,4) alone? Adjacent to (4,4) which is M, so connected. So component includes (3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Let's map adjacency: (3,4) adjacent to (4,4). (4,4) adjacent to (4,3) left, (4,5) right, (5,4) down, (3,4) up. So component B is 5 cells. Now capacitors: G at (1,4) adjacent to M at (1,3) (left) and (2,4) Y? Actually Y is also capacitor. So G adjacent to component A (since (1,3) is M). So component A should become G color. Indeed output row1 col2, col3 become G G. Yes. Y at (2,4) adjacent to M at (3,4) (down) which is part of component B. So component B should become Y. Output rows 3-5 show Y in those positions: row3 col4 Y, row4 col3-5 Y Y Y, row5 col4 Y. Yes. Capacitors themselves vanish: In output, G at (1,4) disappears (becomes O). Y at (2,4) disappears (becomes O). Indeed output row1 col4 O, row2 col4 O. Capacitors not adjacent to any M would just disappear (drain). Not present in example. Thus rule: For each non-M colored cell (capacitor) that is ... [4850 chars truncated]
"A demigod touches a stone idol and their divine essence flows through every crack, transforming the whole statue — then the demigod ascends, leaving no trace."
120b: k=1
See: A mythic landscape with stone idols and wandering demigods of various divine essences.
Do: A demigod adjacent to an idol imbues the entire connected statue with their essence color. The demigod ascends and vanishes. Demigods near no idol ascend anyway. Unblessed idols keep their stone color.
Grid: Same landscape. Background is the mortal plane. Blessed idols glow with divine color. Unblessed idols remain magenta. No demigods remain.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5? Actually example 1 input 5x5. Output also 5x5. Let's map. Input: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Interpretation: Colors: O=orange (maybe background), M=magenta (demigod?), G=green (idol?), Y=yellow (idol?), etc. According to metaphor: idols are stone (maybe magenta?) and demigods are colored? Let's deduce. In input, there are M's scattered, also G and Y present. Output: G and Y appear in new places, M disappear? Indeed output has no M. So M likely demigods that vanish after blessing idols. Idols are maybe G and Y? In input, there are G at (1,4) and Y at (2,4). Those are idols? In output, G appears at (1,2) and (1,3) (two cells) and Y appears at (3,4) unchanged, also Y appears at (4,3-5) and (5,4). So Y spread. Interpret rule: "A demigod adjacent to an idol imbues the entire connected statue with their essence color." So demigod (M) adjacent to an idol (G or Y) will cause the whole connected component of that idol (connected via orthogonal adjacency?) to become the demigod's color? Wait demigod's essence color maybe its own color (M is magenta) but output shows G and Y not M. Actually demigod's color maybe the idol's color? Hmm. Maybe demigods are colored (B,R,G,Y,X,M,O,A,W) and idols are magenta? But input idols are magenta? In example, M are many, maybe idols. Demigods are G and Y? But demigods vanish after ascending, so they disappear. In output, G and Y remain (they are idols now blessed). So demigods are G and Y? Let's test: In input, G at (1,4) adjacent to M at (1,3) left? Actually (1,4) G adjacent left to M (1,3). So demigod (G) adjacent to idol (M) would bless idol turning its connected component to G. Output: M's connected component? Let's see M component near that G: there is M at (1,2) and (1,3) and maybe others connected? Input M positions: (1,2),(1,3); (3,4); (4,3),(4,4),(4,5); (5,4). Also (2,?) none. So there are multiple M clusters. The G at (1,4) adjacent to M at (1,3). The connected statue (connected M's?) maybe the cluster of M's that are orthogonally connected? Let's see cluster: (1,2)-(1,3) are adjacent; (2,?) none; (3,4) not connected to them (distance). So cluster of two M's. In output, those two become G (positions (1,2),(1,3) become G). Indeed output row1 col2-3 are G. So that matches: demigod G adjacent to M cluster, blesses that cluster turning them to G, and demigod disappears (G removed from its original location? In output, original G at (1,4) becomes O (background). Indeed output row1 col4 is O. So demigod moved? Actually demigod disappears, leaving background O. Now Y demigod at (2,4) adjacent to M at (3,4) below. That M is part of larger cluster of M's at rows4-5 etc? Let's see connectivity: M at (3,4) adjacent to (4,4) and (4,5) etc. So cluster includes (3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). That's a plus shape. In output, those po ... [5394 chars truncated]
"A soloist brushes against a formation and every dancer in the troupe mirrors the soloist's costume color — then the soloist takes a final bow and exits."
120b: k=2
See: A warm stage with dancer formations and lone soloists in vivid costumes.
Do: A soloist touching a formation recolors the entire connected troupe to match. The soloist exits. Soloists near no formation simply leave. Unmatched formations keep their original costumes.
Grid: Same stage. Background is the floor. Recolored formations wear the soloist's hue. Unchanged formations remain magenta. No soloists are present.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: O orange, M magenta, G green, Y yellow, B blue, A azure, X grey. Interpretation: "soloist" likely a single cell of a certain color (maybe non-magenta?) touching a "formation" (connected region) of magenta? In description: "soloist touching a formation recolors the entire connected troupe to match. The soloist exits. Soloists near no formation simply leave. Unmatched formations keep their original costumes." So we have soloists (maybe non-M cells) that are adjacent (touching) a magenta region (formation). When they touch, the whole magenta region becomes that soloist's color, and the soloist disappears (becomes background? maybe becomes O? Actually background is floor maybe O? In output, there are no soloist colors left, only background O and recolored formations. Also "Unchanged formations remain magenta." Wait description says unchanged formations remain magenta, but output shows magenta replaced by other colors? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid 5x5: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Let's map. Identify magenta cells (M) in input: positions: (1,2),(1,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Also maybe others? Row4 col3-5, row5 col4. Also there is G at (1,4) and Y at (2,4). Those are soloists? They are non-M colors. Now output: Magenta cells have been recolored to G or Y depending? Let's see. Output row1 col2 becomes G (was M). Row1 col3 becomes G (was M). So the magenta region connected? Let's see connectivity: M cells adjacent orthogonal? (1,2) adjacent to (1,3) yes. (1,2) also adjacent to (2,2) which is O, not M. (1,3) adjacent to (2,3) O. So that forms a small region of two M cells at top row. They got recolored to G, which matches the soloist G at (1,4) which is adjacent to (1,3) (touching). So soloist G touches that magenta region, recolors entire region to G, and soloist disappears (becomes O). Indeed output (1,4) becomes O (was G). Yes row1 col4 output O. Good. Now other magenta region: cells at (3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Are they all connected? Let's see adjacency: (3,4) adjacent to (4,4). (4,3) adjacent to (4,4). (4,5) adjacent to (4,4). (5,4) adjacent to (4,4). So they form a plus shape region of 5 cells. In output, these become Y (yellow). Indeed row3 col4 output Y, row4 col3-5 output Y Y Y, row5 col4 output Y. So recolored to Y, matching soloist Y at (2,4) which is adjacent to (3,4) (touching). Soloist Y disappears (output (2,4) becomes O). Yes. Other M cells? That's all. Thus rule: For each non-M cell (soloist) that is orthogonally adjacent to any magenta cell, that magenta connected component is recolored to the soloist's color, and the soloist cell becomes O (background). If multiple soloists adjacent to same magenta component? Possibly only one? Not in examples. What about soloists not adjacent to any magenta? They "simply ... [6295 chars truncated]
"A mineral vein touches a rock formation and its pigment seeps through every fissure, staining the entire mass — then the vein is depleted."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A warm bedrock with rock formations and scattered mineral veins of various pigments.
Do: A mineral vein adjacent to a formation stains the whole connected mass in its pigment. The vein is exhausted. Veins near no formation simply erode. Unstained formations keep their original mineral color.
Grid: Same bedrock. Background is the warm substrate. Stained formations display the vein's pigment. Unstained formations remain magenta. No loose veins remain.
"A pinch of saffron dropped beside a block of tofu saturates it entirely with color and flavor, while the spice itself vanishes into the broth."
120b: fail
See: A cutting board with pale dough shapes and individual spice grains scattered about.
Do: Any spice grain resting against a dough shape infuses the entire connected piece with its hue. The grain dissolves. Spices that touch no dough wash away. Unseasoned dough keeps its original color.
Grid: Same size board. Background is the bare surface. Infused dough takes the spice color throughout. Plain dough stays pale. No loose spices remain.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: O (orange) background? In description: background is bare surface. In examples, O seems background. Dough shapes are maybe non-O colors? In example1 input grid 5x5. Input contains O, M (magenta), G (green), Y (yellow). Output: O, G, Y. M disappears (spice grains). So M are spices. G and Y are dough shapes? In description: "Any spice grain resting against a dough shape infuses the entire connected piece with its hue. The grain dissolves. Spices that touch no dough wash away. Unseasoned dough keeps its original color." So M are spices (magenta). G and Y are dough shapes (green, yellow). O is background. In example1, we need to see connectivity. Input grid: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Let's map coordinates (r,c). Identify dough pieces: G at (1,4). Y at (2,4). Are they connected? Adjacent orthogonal? (1,4) G adjacent to (2,4) Y vertically, so they are part of same connected component? They are different colors originally. But maybe each color is a dough shape; they are separate shapes even if adjacent? Usually in such puzzles, each color region is a shape. Here G and Y are different colors, so they are separate dough shapes. They are adjacent but distinct. Spice grains are M cells. They can be adjacent to dough shapes. If a spice grain touches a dough shape (orthogonal adjacency?), then the entire connected piece (the dough shape) becomes that spice's color, and the grain disappears (becomes background O). If multiple spices touch same dough shape? Possibly first? In example1 output: Let's see. Output grid: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Interpretation: G region expanded? In input, G at (1,4) had adjacent M at (1,2) (two cells away) not adjacent. Actually M at (1,2) and (1,3) are left of G with O between? Wait positions: Row1 col1 O, col2 M, col3 M, col4 G, col5 O. So M at (1,3) adjacent to G at (1,4) horizontally. So that M touches G. According to rule, G becomes M color (magenta) but output shows G becomes G? Actually output row1 col2 is G, col3 G. So the M cells turned into G (the dough's original color) and G expanded to those cells. So spice color transferred to dough? Wait description: "Any spice grain resting against a dough shape infuses the entire connected piece with its hue. The grain dissolves." That suggests dough takes spice color, not spice takes dough color. But output shows opposite: dough kept its original color, and spice cells become dough color. Let's examine other case: Y dough at (2,4) originally Y. Adjacent M at (3,4) (row3 col4) is M. In output, row3 col4 is Y (so M turned into Y). Also Y region expanded downwards: row4 col3-5 become Y, row5 col4 Y. Those were M cells originally (row4 col3-5 M, row5 col4 M). So indeed M cells adjacent to Y become Y, and Y expands to fill them. So rule: M disappears, replaced by color of adjacent dough shape, and that dough ... [10737 chars truncated]
"A tuning fork struck near a crystal glass makes the entire glass resonate at the fork's pitch, and in doing so, the fork goes silent."
120b: k=2
See: A silent concert hall with glass sculptures and scattered tuning forks of different pitches.
Do: A tuning fork touching a sculpture makes the whole sculpture sing in the fork's key. The fork falls mute. Forks near no sculpture simply fade. Untouched sculptures hold their original hum.
Grid: Same hall dimensions. Background is silence. Resonating sculptures show the fork's color. Unreached sculptures stay magenta. All forks are gone.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: O (orange), M (magenta), G (green), Y (yellow), B (blue), X (grey), A (azure). Background is silence maybe represented by O? In description: background is silence. Sculptures are maybe magenta? In description: "Untouched sculptures stay magenta." So magenta (M) are sculptures initially. Forks are other colors? Tuning forks of different pitches: maybe other colors (G, Y, B, A, X). When a fork touches a sculpture, the sculpture becomes the fork's color, and the fork disappears. Forks near no sculpture fade (disappear). Untouched sculptures stay magenta. All forks are gone. Thus rule: For each magenta cell (M) that is adjacent (maybe orthogonal or maybe any direction) to a non-M colored cell (fork), that M becomes that fork's color, and the fork disappears (cell becomes something else maybe background O). Forks that are not adjacent to any M disappear (become background O). M cells not adjacent to any fork stay M? But description says "Untouched sculptures stay magenta." However output examples show that some M become other colors, some stay M? Let's check. Example1 Input grid 5x5: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Let's map. Input M positions: (1,2),(1,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Also maybe others? That's all. Fork colors present: G at (1,4), Y at (2,4). Also maybe others? No. Now output: M cells changed to G or Y or O? Let's see output positions: (1,2) becomes G (was M). (1,3) becomes G (was M). (3,4) becomes Y (was M). (4,3) becomes Y, (4,4) becomes Y, (4,5) becomes Y, (5,4) becomes Y. So all M cells turned into either G or Y, none stayed M. So each M got a color from a fork. Which fork? Possibly nearest? Let's compute distances. Fork G at (1,4). Fork Y at (2,4). M cells near G: (1,2) distance 2 horizontally, (1,3) distance 1. Those turned G. M cells near Y: (3,4) distance 1 vertical, (4,3) distance? (4,3) to (2,4) distance sqrt? Manhattan distance = |4-2|+|3-4|=2+1=3. (4,4) distance 2, (4,5) distance 3, (5,4) distance 3. All turned Y. So maybe rule: each M cell takes color of nearest fork (by Manhattan distance). If tie? Not in example. Also forks disappear: In output, original fork cells become O (background). Indeed (1,4) G becomes O, (2,4) Y becomes O. Also other non-M non-fork cells remain O. Thus rule: For each magenta cell, find nearest non-M colored cell (fork). Replace magenta with that color. Then set all non-M colored cells to O (background). If a magenta cell has no fork reachable? maybe stays M. Example2. Example2 Input 6x5? Actually rows: let's list. Rows: 1: O O O M 2: G O M M 3: O O M O 4: O O O O 5: B M M M 6: O O M O So grid 6 rows, 4 columns. M positions: (1,4),(2,3),(2,4),(3,3),(5,2),(5,3),(5,4),(6,3). Also maybe others. Fork colors: G at (2,1), B at (5,1). That's it. Output: Row1: O O O M (unchanged? Actuall ... [8436 chars truncated]
"A coach standing at the sideline taps a player, and suddenly the whole team dons that coach's jersey color — but the coach steps off the field."
120b: k=1
See: A playing field with clusters of uniformed players and individual coaches positioned around the edges.
Do: A coach adjacent to a team re-uniforms every connected player in the coach's color, then the coach leaves. Coaches near no team simply exit. Uncoached teams keep their original kit.
Grid: Same field. Background is the pitch. Recolored teams wear the coach's hue. Uncoached teams stay in their original jerseys. No coaches remain on the field.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5? Actually example 1 input 5x5. Output also 5x5. Let's map. Input: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Interpretation: Colors: O=orange (maybe background), M=magenta (coaches?), G=green (team?), Y=yellow (team?), etc. We need to see pattern: Coaches adjacent to a team recolor connected players. Identify "coaches" maybe magenta M? In description: "coach adjacent to a team re-uniforms every connected player in the coach's color, then the coach leaves. Coaches near no team simply exit. Uncoached teams keep their original kit." So coaches are maybe M (magenta). Teams are uniform colors like G, Y? In input, there are G at (1,4) and Y at (2,4). Also M's scattered. Let's label coordinates (row,col). Input M positions: (1,2),(1,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Also maybe others? Actually row4 has three Ms at cols3-5. Row5 has M at col4. Teams: G at (1,4). Y at (2,4). Also maybe other colors? No. Now output: G's appear at (1,2),(1,3) originally M's turned into G? Actually output row1: O G G O O. So positions (1,2) and (1,3) become G. Those were M adjacent to G? Yes G at (1,4) is adjacent left to (1,3) and (1,2) is two steps away but still adjacent via (1,3) after recolor? Let's see rule: coach adjacent to a team recolors every connected player in the coach's color. So a coach (M) adjacent to a team (G) will recolor the entire connected component of that team (players of same color) to the coach's color (magenta). But output shows G turned into G? Wait they recolor players to coach's color, but output shows G's not M. Actually output shows G at positions where M were, not M. So maybe coaches are G and they recolor team of M? Let's test. Maybe coaches are G (green) and they recolor adjacent magenta clusters to green. In input, there is a G at (1,4) adjacent to M at (1,3) and (2,4) Y not M. So G adjacent to M cluster (positions (1,2),(1,3)). The connected component of M that is adjacent? M's at (1,2),(1,3) are connected to each other and also maybe to other M's via adjacency? They are also adjacent to other M's? (3,4) not connected. So the component of M at top left includes (1,2),(1,3). So G coach recolors that component to G. That matches output: those become G. The original G maybe disappears? In output, original G at (1,4) becomes O (background). Indeed output (1,4) is O. So coach leaves after recoloring, turning its own cell to background O. So G disappears. Similarly Y at (2,4) is a coach adjacent to M component at bottom? Let's see M component at (3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4). Are they connected? Yes they form a cluster. Y at (2,4) is adjacent (down) to M at (3,4). So Y recolors that whole M component to Y. In output, those positions become Y. Indeed output rows 3-5 show Y's in those positions. Also original Y at (2,4) becomes O (background). Output row2 col4 i ... [5917 chars truncated]
"A single lightning bolt strikes one edge of a cloud and electrifies the entire formation with its color, while the bolt itself flickers out."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A warm sky with cloud formations and scattered sparks of colored lightning.
Do: A bolt touching a cloud charges the whole connected cloud mass with the bolt's color. The bolt vanishes. Bolts that strike empty sky dissipate. Uncharged clouds hold their original shade.
Grid: Same sky. Background is orange warmth. Charged clouds glow in the bolt's hue. Uncharged clouds remain magenta. All lightning is gone.
"A mason places a colored keystone beside an arch, and every brick in the connected structure adopts that stone's glaze — then the keystone crumbles to dust."
120b: k=1
See: A construction site with brick structures and scattered colored keystones.
Do: A keystone adjacent to a structure glazes the entire connected building in the keystone's color. The keystone dissolves. Keystones beside nothing crumble away. Unglazed structures keep their raw brick.
Grid: Same site. Background is bare ground. Glazed structures show keystone color throughout. Unglazed structures remain magenta. No keystones remain.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: "construction site with brick structures and scattered colored keystones." In grid, structures likely are contiguous region of magenta? In example, input grid has O, M, G, Y etc. Output shows glazed structures colored keystone color, keystones disappear, keystones beside nothing crumble away. Unglazed structures keep their raw brick (magenta). No keystones remain. So we need to identify "structures" (buildings) and "keystones". Likely structures are contiguous region of magenta (M) maybe representing bricks. Keystones are other colors (non-M) adjacent to structure? In example, input: let's write coordinates. Example1 Input 5x5: Row0: O M M G O Row1: O O O Y O Row2: O O O M O Row3: O O M M M Row4: O O O M O Output: Row0: O G G O O Row1: O O O O O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O Y Y Y Row4: O O O Y O Observations: In output, many O become something else? Actually O remains O except where glazed? Let's see. Input magenta positions (M): (0,1),(0,2),(2,3),(3,2),(3,3),(3,4),(4,3). That's a cluster? Let's see connectivity orthogonal. (0,1)-(0,2) adjacent. (0,2) not adjacent to others. (2,3) adjacent to (3,3). (3,2)-(3,3)-(3,4) line. (4,3) adjacent to (3,3). So there are two separate clusters: cluster A: (0,1),(0,2) top row. cluster B: (2,3),(3,2),(3,3),(3,4),(4,3). So two structures. Keystones: other colors adjacent to structures: G at (0,3) adjacent to (0,2) (structure A). Y at (1,3) adjacent to (0,3) but not directly to M? Actually Y adjacent to (0,3) which is G, not M. Also Y at (3,1)? Wait input Y at (1,3) only? Actually input row1 col3 Y. Also maybe other colors? That's it. Also there is G at (0,3) which is keystone adjacent to structure A. Y at (1,3) adjacent to G but not to M. In output, structure A becomes glazed with G color: output row0 col1? Actually output row0: O G G O O. So positions (0,1) and (0,2) become G. Yes both M turned to G. Also the keystone G at (0,3) disappears? In output (0,3) is O (original O). So G removed. Good. Structure B: adjacent keystone? There is Y at (3,1)? Wait input row3 col1 O. No Y there. Actually Y at (1,3) not adjacent to structure B. But there is Y at (3,? ) none. However output shows structure B glazed with Y: output rows3 and4 have Y's. Indeed output row3 col2? Actually output row3: O O Y Y Y (positions 2,3,4 become Y). Row4: O O O Y O (position 3 Y). So all M in cluster B turned to Y. Where did Y come from? Input Y at (1,3) is not adjacent to cluster B. But maybe Y is considered a keystone adjacent to structure B via connectivity through empty O? Not likely. Maybe rule: For each color (non-M) that is adjacent (orthogonal) to any M cell, that color spreads to the entire connected component of M cells (the building). The keystone disappears. If multiple keystones adjacent to same building? maybe choose one? In example, building A had adjacent G at (0,3) (right side). So G spreads. Building B had adjacent Y at (1,3) which is not directly adjacent but maybe diag ... [5196 chars truncated]
"A spy infiltrates a fortress through a single gate and raises their banner over every tower — then vanishes into legend."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A battlefield with fortifications and lone agents carrying colored banners.
Do: An agent touching a fortress wall plants their banner across every connected rampart. The agent disappears. Agents near no fortress simply desert. Unconquered fortresses fly their original colors.
Grid: Same battlefield. Background is open terrain. Conquered fortresses display the agent's banner color. Unconquered ones stay magenta. All agents are gone.
"A spotlight operator touches a prop and the entire set piece floods with that light's color, while the operator slips backstage into darkness."
120b: k=2
See: A dark stage with set pieces and individual spotlight operators carrying colored gels.
Do: An operator adjacent to a set piece bathes the whole connected prop in their gel's color. The operator exits. Operators near no set piece leave anyway. Unlit set pieces keep their original look.
Grid: Same stage. Background is the dark boards. Lit set pieces glow in the operator's color. Unlit pieces stay magenta. No operators remain visible.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: O (orange) maybe background? M (magenta) maybe operators? G (green) maybe set piece? Y (yellow) maybe set piece? B (blue) maybe set piece? A azure etc. Interpretation: Operators are adjacent to set pieces, they "bathe" whole connected prop (connected component) in their color, then operator disappears. Operators near no set piece leave anyway (i.e., disappear). Unlit set pieces keep original look (magenta). Output: no operators remain visible. Background stays same? Let's map. In Example1 Input grid 5x5: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Let's label cells: maybe O = background (dark stage). M = operator? G/Y/B etc are set pieces? In output, we see G and Y appear where previously there were M? Actually output row1 col2 originally M becomes G. Row1 col3 M becomes G. Row1 col4 G stays G? Wait original row1 col4 is G, output row1 col4 O. So G changed to O? Hmm. Let's map: Input row1 col4 G (green) becomes O (orange) in output. So green set piece got turned to orange? Not consistent. Maybe operators are O? Let's think. Alternative: Operators are colored cells (maybe O) that cause adjacent set pieces (M?) to change? Let's examine. In input, there are many O's (orange) maybe background. M's maybe set pieces? Output shows many G and Y where M were. So M's turned into G/Y depending on adjacency to something. Look at Example1: Input M positions: (1,2),(1,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4) Also (2,?) none, (2,4) Y, (1,4) G. Output: M positions become: (1,2) G, (1,3) G, (3,4) Y, (4,3) Y, (4,4) Y, (4,5) Y, (5,4) Y. So M's turned into either G or Y. The color depends on something: maybe each connected component of M's is "prop" and gets colored by adjacent operator's color. Operators maybe are G and Y in input? Indeed there is a G at (1,4) and Y at (2,4). Those could be operators (colored gels). They are adjacent to M's? Let's see adjacency (orthogonal? maybe 4-direction). G at (1,4) adjacent to M at (1,3) (left) and (1,5) O (right) and (2,4) Y (down) and (0,4) none. So G adjacent to M (1,3). Y at (2,4) adjacent to M at (3,4) (down) and (2,3) O left, (2,5) O right, (1,4) G up. So Y adjacent to M (3,4). Also Y adjacent to M? Not directly to others. Now output shows that the M component connected to G becomes G, and component connected to Y becomes Y. Let's see connectivity of M's: Are they all connected via orthogonal adjacency? Let's map M positions adjacency: (1,2) adjacent to (1,3) and (2,2) O and (0,2). (1,3) adjacent to (1,2) and (1,4) G and (2,3) O. So (1,2) and (1,3) are a small component adjacent to G. (3,4) adjacent to (4,4) M, (2,4) Y, (3,3) O, (3,5) O. (4,4) adjacent to (3,4) M, (4,3) M, (4,5) M, (5,4) M. (4,3) adjacent to (4,4) M, (3,3) O, (5,3) O, (4,2) O. (4,5) adjacent to (4,4) M, (3,5) O, (5,5) O, (4,6) none. (5,4) adjacent to (4,4) M, (5,3 ... [7709 chars truncated]
"A single bee dusted with pollen lands on one petal and the entire flower blooms in that pollen's color — then the bee flies away, never to return."
120b: k=1
See: A garden bed with flower clusters and individual pollen-carrying bees.
Do: A bee touching a flower transforms the whole connected bloom to match its pollen color. The bee departs. Bees that find no flower simply drift off. Unpollinated flowers keep their original hue.
Grid: Same garden. Background is soil. Pollinated flowers show the bee's pollen color. Unpollinated flowers remain magenta. All bees are gone.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x5? Actually example 1 input 5x5. Output also 5x5. Let's map. Input: Row1: O M M G O Row2: O O O Y O Row3: O O O M O Row4: O O M M M Row5: O O O M O Output: Row1: O G G O O Row2: O O O O O Row3: O O O Y O Row4: O O Y Y Y Row5: O O O Y O Interpretation: Colors: O=orange (background soil), M=magenta (unpollinated flower), G=green (bee?), Y=yellow (bee?), maybe bees are G and Y? In description: bees carry pollen of some color. In output, pollinated flowers become bee's pollen color. Unpollinated remain magenta. All bees gone. So in input, there are bees (maybe G and Y) and flowers (magenta). After transformation, each connected component of magenta (flower cluster) that is adjacent (touching) a bee becomes recolored to bee's color. Bees disappear (become background O). Bees that have no adjacent flower just disappear (become O). Flowers not adjacent to any bee stay magenta? But output shows no magenta left; all M turned into G or Y? Let's check. Input positions of M: many. Output shows G and Y in those positions? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 1-5, cols 1-5. Input: (1,2)=M, (1,3)=M, (1,4)=G (bee?), (2,4)=Y (bee?), (3,4)=M, (4,3)=M, (4,4)=M, (4,5)=M, (5,4)=M. Output: Row1: O G G O O => (1,2)=G, (1,3)=G, (1,4)=O (bee gone), (1,5)=O. Row2: all O, so (2,4) Y disappeared. Row3: O O O Y O => (3,4)=Y (was M now Y) Row4: O O Y Y Y => (4,3)=Y, (4,4)=Y, (4,5)=Y Row5: O O O Y O => (5,4)=Y So all M cells turned into either G or Y depending on which bee they are connected to. Bees G at (1,4) turned its adjacent M cluster to G. Bee Y at (2,4) turned its adjacent M cluster to Y. The clusters: Let's see connectivity (4-direction?). The M cells form two clusters? Let's see adjacency. Cluster near top left: M at (1,2) adjacent to (1,3) M, also maybe to (2,2) O not M. (1,3) adjacent to (1,2) and (2,3) O and (1,4) G (bee). So this cluster of M (1,2)-(1,3) touches bee G at (1,4) (adjacent horizontally). So they become G. Other M cells: (3,4), (4,3),(4,4),(4,5),(5,4) form a cluster connected together (vertical/horizontal). They are adjacent to bee Y at (2,4) (above (3,4)). So they become Y. Thus rule: For each bee (color not magenta? maybe any non-O, non-M), find the connected component of magenta cells that are reachable via adjacency (4-dir) from the bee (i.e., touching). Then recolor that component to bee's color. Then remove bee (set to O). If a bee has no adjacent magenta, just disappears (becomes O). If a magenta component is adjacent to multiple bees? Possibly ambiguous; maybe not present. Thus we need to apply to test input. Test Input grid dimensions: 7 rows, 7 columns. Let's write coordinates. Row1: Y O M O O O X Row2: M M M O O O O Row3: O O M O B O O Row4: O O O O M M O Row5: O O O O M M O Row6: M M A O O O O Row7: O M O O O O O Colors: Y=yellow bee, B=blue bee, A=azure bee? maybe also bee. X=grey maybe bee? In description, bees are various colors (pollen). So any non-O, non-M ... [4256 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 3×3 grid where each cell is either black (background) or one of several distinct colors. The number of unique non-black colors present in the grid varies from puzzle to puzzle.
Do: 1. Count the number of unique non-black colors in the input grid. Call this number N. 2. Create an output grid of size (3×N) by (3×N). 3. Replace each cell in the 3×3 input with an N×N block of that cell's color. Black cells become N×N blocks of black. The spatial arrangement of blocks in the output mirrors the arrangement of cells in the input.
Grid: The input is always a 3×3 grid. The output is a (3N)×(3N) grid, where N is the count of unique non-black colors in the input. The background color is black (.). The output is effectively the input scaled up by a factor of N in both dimensions.
"Each voice in a choir grows louder the more singers join the ensemble."
120b: k=2
See: A small stage with nine positions arranged in a square — some occupied by performers in colored costumes, others left dark and empty. Each performer is a distinct voice in the ensemble.
Do: The more voices present in the choir, the more space each one claims. Every performer swells in presence proportional to the total number of singers — as if each voice resonates with every other, amplifying itself. The empty seats swell too, but remain silent darkness. The chorus arranges itself exactly as they stood on the original stage, just grander.
Grid: The intimate 3×3 rehearsal stage becomes a full concert hall. Each performer's single seat blooms into a square throne whose size is dictated by the richness of the ensemble — a solo act barely grows, but a quintet commands enormous territory. The darkness between performers expands in kind, a respectful silence scaled to match the music.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output larger grid. In example1 input: Row1: . A . Row2: . M M Row3: W A . Output is 9x9? Let's see dimensions: output shown 9 rows each 9 columns. So scaling factor? Possibly each input cell becomes a 3x3 block? Since 3x3 input -> 9x9 output, factor 3. But pattern not simple uniform scaling: For example input cell '.' at (1,1) becomes top-left 3x3 block of '.'? Output rows1-3 cols1-3 are '.' indeed. Input (1,2) = A becomes block of A? Output rows1-3 cols4-6 are A. Yes. Input (1,3) '.' becomes block of '.' at cols7-9 rows1-3. So each cell expands to 3x3 block of its color. But check other cells: Input (2,1) '.' becomes rows4-6 cols1-3 '.'? Output rows4-6 cols1-3 are '.'? Actually rows4-6 cols1-3 are '.'? Let's see output row4: ". . . M M M M M M". So first three are '.' yes. Input (2,2)=M becomes block rows4-6 cols4-6 all M. Indeed row4 cols4-6 M, row5 same, row6 same. Input (2,3)=M becomes block rows4-6 cols7-9 M. Yes. Input (3,1)=W becomes rows7-9 cols1-3 W. Output rows7-9 first three are W. Input (3,2)=A becomes rows7-9 cols4-6 A. Yes. Input (3,3)=. becomes rows7-9 cols7-9 '.'. Thus rule: each cell expands to a 3x3 block of same color. That's simple scaling factor 3. Check example2: Input 3x3, output 6x6? Actually output rows: 6 rows, each 6 columns. That's scaling factor 2. Let's verify: Input: Row1: B . Y Row2: . Y . Row3: . B . Output rows1-2 cols1-2 should be B block? Output row1: "B B . . Y Y". So first two columns B B, matches scaling factor 2. Row1 col3-4 '.' '.' matches input (1,2) '.' block. Row1 col5-6 Y Y matches input (1,3) Y block. So scaling factor equals number of distinct colors? Wait example1 scaling factor 3, example2 scaling factor 2. Maybe scaling factor equals number of non-empty (non-.) cells? Example1 non-'.' cells: A, M, M, W, A =5 distinct? Actually count non-'.' cells =5. Not 3. Maybe scaling factor equals number of unique colors present? Example1 colors: A, M, W => 3 unique colors => scaling factor 3. Example2 colors: B, Y => 2 unique colors (since '.' not counted) => scaling factor 2. That matches! So rule: Determine number of distinct non-'.' colors in input; call that N. Then each cell expands to an N x N block of its color (including '.' becomes block of '.'), preserving arrangement. Thus for test input, we need to find distinct colors (excluding .). Input: Row1: . B . Row2: . A O Row3: W W . Colors present: B, A, O, W. That's 4 distinct colors. So scaling factor N=4. Output will be 12x12 (since 3*4 =12). Each input cell becomes 4x4 block. We need to construct output grid rows 1-12, cols 1-12. Let's map each input cell to block coordinates: Input rows i=1..3, cols j=1..3. Block rows: (i-1)*4+1 to i*4. Block cols: (j-1)*4+1 to j*4. Now fill with the cell's character. Let's create. Input (1,1) = '.' => rows1-4, cols1-4 are '.'. Input (1,2) = B => rows1-4, cols5-8 are B. Input (1,3) = '.' => rows1-4, cols9-12 are '.'. Input (2,1) = '.' => ... [889 chars truncated]
"Cells in a tissue multiply through mitosis, each dividing more aggressively the more diverse the population around them becomes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A petri dish of colored organisms scattered among empty medium, each species distinct.
Do: Each organism replicates itself into a colony whose size reflects the biodiversity of the dish — the richer the ecosystem, the larger every colony swells.
Grid: The dish scales outward uniformly; empty medium expands in lockstep with living colonies, preserving the original spatial arrangement of the culture.
"Stars in a constellation inflate their apparent magnitude when the sky grows crowded with distinct celestial bodies — as if competing for an observer's attention."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small star chart with colored celestial objects and dark void between them.
Do: Each object and each void region expands into a square zone proportional to the count of distinct luminaries in the chart.
Grid: The star chart scales uniformly outward, preserving the original constellation pattern as each point becomes a block.
"Ships in a harbor unfurl more sail the moment they spot additional flags on the horizon — each vessel demands presence proportional to the fleet's diversity."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small harbor chart with colored vessels and open water.
Do: Every ship and every stretch of open water swells into a square berth whose size matches the number of distinct flags flying in the harbor.
Grid: The harbor chart scales uniformly, each original position expanding into a square block while preserving the fleet's formation.
"Components on a circuit board demand larger footprints when the bill of materials lists more unique part types — as if each resistor and capacitor needs breathing room from diversity."
120b: k=1
See: A small PCB layout with colored components and empty pads.
Do: Each component and each empty pad scales into a square region whose side equals the number of unique part types on the board.
Grid: The PCB layout grows uniformly, maintaining the original component placement as every position becomes a larger square footprint.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input is 3x3? Let's see: lines: ". A ." ". M M" "W A ." That's 3 rows, each 3 columns. Output is 9x9? Let's see output lines: appears 9 rows, each 9 columns. Indeed scaling factor 3? Actually side equals number of unique part types on the board. Unique part types in input: colors present: . (black), A (azure), M (magenta), W (maroon). That's 4 unique types (including .?). Does . count as a part type? Probably yes, as black empty pad. Number of unique part types = 4. So each cell becomes a 4x4 block? But output is 9x9, not 12x12. Let's examine mapping. Input 3x3, output 9x9 => scaling factor 3. So side equals number of unique part types on the board? Unique types maybe excluding .? Let's count non-blank types: A, M, W = 3. So scaling factor = 3. That matches output size: each input cell becomes 3x3 block. Indeed output shows each original cell expanded to 3x3 region of same color? Let's verify. Input cell (row1,col2) = A. In output, rows 1-3, cols 4-6 are A. Indeed output first three rows have A A A in columns 4-6. Good. Input cell (row2,col2) = M. Output rows 4-6, cols 4-6 are M. Actually output rows 4-6, cols 4-9 are M? Let's check: output row4: ". . . M M M M M M". That's 9 columns: first three are ., then six M. Wait scaling factor 3 would give each cell 3 columns. Input row2: ". M M". So columns: col1 '.' => should become 3 '.' in output rows4-6 cols1-3. Indeed they are '.' . Good. col2 M => should become 3 M in cols4-6. But we see M in cols4-9 (six M). That's because col2 and col3 both M, each expands to 3 columns, so combined they make 6 M. So pattern matches. Input cell (row3,col1) = W. Output rows7-9 cols1-3 are W. Indeed row7: "W W W A A A . . .". Good. Thus rule: Determine number of distinct non-blank colors (excluding .) in input. That number N is scaling factor. Then each cell expands to N x N block of its original color. Now test input: ". B ." ". A O" "W W ." We need to count distinct non-blank colors: B, A, O, W. That's 4 distinct colors. So scaling factor N=4. Input grid 3x3 => output 12x12 (since 3*4=12). Each cell becomes 4x4 block. Let's construct output. Define rows of output: for each input row i (0-index), produce N rows (4) identical. Input row1: ". B ." Columns: col1 '.' => 4 '.'; col2 'B' => 4 'B'; col3 '.' => 4 '.'. Thus each of the 4 rows for this input row will be: "....BBBB...."? Wait need 12 columns: 4 '.' + 4 'B' + 4 '.' = 4+4+4=12. Represent as characters separated by spaces later. So rows 1-4: columns 1-4 '.'; 5-8 'B'; 9-12 '.'. Row2 input: ". A O" => 4 '.'; 4 'A'; 4 'O'. Rows 5-8: '.'*4, 'A'*4, 'O'*4. Row3 input: "W W ." => 4 'W'; 4 'W'; 4 '.'. Rows 9-12: 'W'*4, 'W'*4, '.'*4. Now produce output grid lines with spaces between characters. Let's write rows: Rows1-4: . . . . B B B B . . . . Rows5-8: . . . . A A A A O O O O Rows9-12: W W W W W W W W . . . . Check counts: each row 12 entries. Now produce final answer block. ... [2 chars truncated]
"Gods in a pantheon claim dominion over larger realms when more deities join their council — divine ego scales with divine company."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small celestial map with colored divine domains and primordial void.
Do: Each god's domain and each stretch of void expands into a square territory proportional to the number of distinct deities in the pantheon.
Grid: The cosmic map scales uniformly, each original position becoming a block, preserving the divine arrangement.
"Dancers on a floor take wider steps the more partners join the ensemble — each performer's personal space grows with the troupe's headcount."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small dance floor with colored performers and empty spaces in a grid.
Do: Every dancer and every gap claims a square area whose side equals the number of distinct performers, as if the choreography breathes with ensemble size.
Grid: The floor expands uniformly, preserving the original formation as each position becomes a square block.
"Mineral deposits in a cross-section crystallize into larger formations when the sample reveals greater mineral diversity — each vein feeds on the complexity of its neighbors."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small geological cross-section with colored mineral deposits and barren rock.
Do: Each mineral deposit and each barren zone grows into a square crystal whose dimensions match the number of distinct minerals in the sample.
Grid: The cross-section scales uniformly, preserving the original stratigraphy as every position expands into a square block.
"Ingredients on a cutting board swell when they sense company — the more flavors in the pot, the more each one insists on being tasted."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sparse arrangement of ingredients resting on a neutral surface, some spaces left bare.
Do: Each ingredient puffs up into a generous portion proportional to how many distinct flavors share the recipe, while bare spaces become equally generous servings of nothing.
Grid: The cutting board grows to accommodate every inflated ingredient, each occupying a square region, preserving the original mise en place layout.
"Notes on a staff demand space proportional to the richness of the chord they belong to — a solo note whispers, but in harmony each voice insists on resonance."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sparse score with colored notes placed among silent rests on a small staff.
Do: Every note and rest expands its duration based on how many distinct pitches appear in the composition — fuller orchestration stretches every beat equally.
Grid: The expanded score preserves the original arrangement of notes and rests, each now occupying a square block whose side length matches the number of distinct tones.
"Players on a field claim territory based on how many rival teams showed up to the tournament — more competitors, more ground each must defend."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Athletes and empty patches scattered across a small playing field.
Do: Each player stakes out a square territory whose size reflects the total number of teams competing; unoccupied zones grow by the same proportion.
Grid: The field expands uniformly, each original position becoming a block, maintaining the spatial formation of the original lineup.
"Storm fronts on a weather map expand their pressure zones when more distinct weather systems converge on the same region."
120b: k=1
See: A small forecast map with colored weather systems and calm patches.
Do: Each system — and each calm zone — inflates its area based on how many distinct fronts are present, as if mutual atmospheric pressure forces them all to swell equally.
Grid: The map scales uniformly outward, each original cell becoming a square region, preserving the original meteorological layout.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . A . Row2: . M M Row3: W A . So 3x3. Output is 9x9? Let's see output rows: appears 9 rows, each 9 columns. Indeed each original cell becomes 3x3 block? Actually scaling factor maybe number of distinct colors? Let's examine mapping. We need to map each original cell to a 3x3 block of something? Let's map. Input positions (r,c): (1,1) '.' becomes output region? In output top-left 3x3 block appears '.'? Let's view output first 3 rows, first 3 columns: they are '.' '.' '.' each row. So '.' maps to '.' block of size 3? Yes. (1,2) 'A' maps to region of A's? Output rows 1-3, columns 4-6 are A A A each row. So A block size 3x3 of A. (1,3) '.' maps to columns 7-9 rows1-3 '.' block. Row2 input: (2,1) '.' maps to rows4-6 cols1-3 '.'? Let's check output rows4-6 cols1-3: they are '.' '.' '.' each row. Yes. (2,2) 'M' maps to rows4-6 cols4-6? Actually output rows4-6 cols4-6 are M M M each row. Yes. (2,3) 'M' maps to rows4-6 cols7-9 also M block. Indeed rows4-6 cols7-9 are M. Row3 input: (3,1) 'W' maps to rows7-9 cols1-3 W block. Yes. (3,2) 'A' maps to rows7-9 cols4-6 A block. (3,3) '.' maps to rows7-9 cols7-9 '.' block. Thus rule: each cell expands to a 3x3 block of same color. So scaling factor 3. Why 3? Possibly number of distinct colors present in input? Let's count distinct non-blank? Input colors: . (black), A, M, W. That's 4 distinct. Not 3. Maybe number of distinct "systems" (non-.)? That's A, M, W =3. So scaling factor equals number of distinct non-blank colors. That matches: 3 distinct colors => each cell becomes 3x3 block. Check: In example, distinct non-blank colors are A, M, W =3. So scaling factor 3. Thus transformation: Determine N = number of distinct colors excluding '.' (black). Then each cell expands to N x N block of its original color. Now test input: Input grid 3x3: Row1: . B . Row2: . A O Row3: W W . Colors present (excluding .): B, A, O, W. That's 4 distinct colors. So N=4. Thus each cell becomes 4x4 block. Output grid size = 3*4 =12 rows and columns. We need to produce 12x12 grid where each original cell is replaced by 4x4 block of same character. Let's construct. Define rows of output as groups of 4 rows per input row. Input row1: columns: (1) '.' (2) 'B' (3) '.' So for rows 1-4 of output: - columns 1-4: '.' block - columns 5-8: 'B' block - columns 9-12: '.' block Thus rows1-4 each: 4 '.' then 4 'B' then 4 '.'. Row2 input: . A O Rows5-8 output: - cols1-4 '.' block - cols5-8 'A' block - cols9-12 'O' block Row3 input: W W . Rows9-12 output: - cols1-4 'W' block - cols5-8 'W' block - cols9-12 '.' block Now produce each row string with spaces between characters. Rows1-4: " . . . . B B B B . . . . " (12 chars). Let's write without leading space. Row pattern: 4 '.' then 4 'B' then 4 '.' So row: . . . . B B B B . . . . Rows1-4 identical. Rows5-8: 4 '.' then 4 'A' then 4 'O' Row: . . . . A A A A O O O O Rows9-12: 4 'W' then 4 'W' t ... [344 chars truncated]
"Rooms in a blueprint demand more square footage the moment more tenants sign leases in the building."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small floorplan with colored rooms and vacant lots arranged in a grid.
Do: Every room and every vacancy scales up its footprint equally, determined by how many distinct tenants occupy the building — more tenants, grander rooms for all.
Grid: The blueprint grows proportionally, each original unit becoming a square block, maintaining the spatial relationships of the original design.
"Banners on a battlefield spread wider formation lines whenever intelligence reports more factions entering the conflict."
120b: k=2
See: A tactical map with colored banners marking factions and neutral ground between them.
Do: Each faction's territory — and each no-man's-land — expands its footprint in proportion to how many distinct armies have taken the field.
Grid: The battlefield scales uniformly, preserving the original deployment pattern as each position swells into a square zone.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples.
Example1 input 3x3? Actually input lines:
". A ."
". M M"
"W A ."
That's 3 rows, 3 columns.
Output is 9x9? Let's see output lines: appears 9 rows, each row length 9. So scaling factor 3? Each input cell becomes 3x3 block? But pattern seems more complex: The output shows three zones: top-left 3x3 all '.'? Actually first three rows: ". . . A A A . . ." So first three rows: columns 1-3 '.'; 4-6 'A'; 7-9 '.'.
Corresponds to input: first row ". A .". So each cell expanded to 3x3 block: '.' becomes 3x3 of '.'; 'A' becomes 3x3 of 'A'; '.' becomes 3x3 of '.' . That matches first three rows.
Second three rows correspond to second input row ". M M". Output rows 4-6: ". . . M M M M M M". Wait that's 9 columns: first three '.' (from '.'), then columns 4-6 'M' (from first M), columns 7-9 'M' (from second M). So each cell expanded to 3x3 block of its color. Yes.
Third three rows correspond to third input row "W A .": output rows 7-9: "W W W A A A . . .". So each cell expanded.
Thus rule: each input cell expands to a square of size N where N = number of distinct colors present in the whole input? Let's check: In example1 distinct colors: '.' , A, M, W . That's 4 distinct. But scaling factor is 3, not 4. Maybe scaling factor equals number of distinct non-'.' colors? That's A, M, W =3. Yes scaling factor 3. Example2: Input 3x3 with colors B, Y, B. Distinct non-'.' colors: B and Y =2. Output size? Input 3x3, output appears 6x6. Scaling factor 2. Indeed each cell expands to 2x2 block.
Thus rule: Determine number of distinct non-blank colors (excluding '.'), call it k. Then each cell expands to k x k block of its color (including '.' cells become '.' block). Output grid size = original rows * k, columns * k.
Check example2: Input:
B . Y
. Y .
. B .
Distinct non-'.' colors: B, Y => k=2. Output 6x6. Let's verify mapping: Input cell (1,1) B becomes 2x2 block of B at top-left rows1-2 cols1-2. Output first two rows start "B B". Yes. Input (1,2) '.' becomes 2x2 '.' block at cols3-4 rows1-2. Output shows ". .". Good. Input (1,3) Y becomes 2x2 Y at cols5-6 rows1-2. Output shows "Y Y". Works.
Thus rule is simple scaling.
Now test input:
". B ."
". A O"
"W W ."
We need distinct non-'.' colors: B, A, O, W. That's 4 distinct. So scaling factor k=4.
Thus output will be 3*4 =12 rows, 3*4=12 columns.
We need to expand each cell to 4x4 block.
Let's label input grid coordinates:
Row1: col1 '.' ; col2 'B' ; col3 '.'
Row2: col1 '.' ; col2 'A' ; col3 'O'
Row3: col1 'W' ; col2 'W' ; col3 '.'
Now produce output rows.
We'll create 12 rows grouped in blocks of 4 per input row.
First block rows 1-4 correspond to input row1.
Within each of these rows, columns 1-4 correspond to input col1 ('.'), columns5-8 to col2 ('B'), columns9-12 to col3 ('.').
Thus rows1-4: columns1-4 '.'; columns5-8 'B'; columns9-12 '.'.
So rows1-4 each: " . . . . B B B B . . . . " (with spaces). Represent as 12 characters.
Second block rows5-8 correspond
... [672 chars truncated]
"Spotlights on a stage widen their beams in proportion to the size of the cast — the more characters, the more commanding each presence becomes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small stage grid with colored spotlights and dark unlit areas.
Do: Each spotlight and each shadow expands into a square region whose dimensions equal the number of distinct characters performing.
Grid: The stage grows uniformly, maintaining the original blocking while every lit and unlit zone swells equally.
"Seeds planted in a garden bed spread their roots wider when they sense more species growing nearby — biodiversity feeds ambition."
120b: k=1
See: A small plot with colored plantings and bare soil arranged in a grid.
Do: Each plant and each bare patch claims a square territory whose side equals the number of distinct species in the garden.
Grid: The garden expands uniformly from its original layout, every plot position becoming a larger square block.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input is 3x3? Let's see: lines: ". A ." ". M M" "W A ." That's 3 rows, each 3 columns. Output is 9x9? Actually output shown 9 rows, each 9 columns. So scaling factor? The description: each plant and each bare patch claims a square territory whose side equals the number of distinct species in the garden. Number of distinct species in garden = count of distinct colors present in input? In example1 distinct colors: . (black), A (azure), M (magenta), W (maroon). That's 4 distinct symbols. So side length = 4. Each cell expands to 4x4 block? But output is 9x9, not 12x12. Wait maybe each cell expands to side = number of distinct non-blank? Or maybe side equals number of distinct colors excluding '.'? Distinct non-blank: A, M, W =3. Side length 3. Then each cell becomes 3x3 block, making output 9x9 (3*3). That matches. So rule: each cell expands to a square of size N where N = number of distinct non-'.' colors in input grid. The block is filled with the original cell's color? Let's verify output pattern. Input grid coordinates: Row0: . A . Row1: . M M Row2: W A . N=3. So each cell becomes 3x3 block of its color. Thus output rows 0-2 correspond to first input row expanded. First input row: . A . So first 3 columns of output rows 0-2 should be '.' block (3x3). Next 3 columns should be 'A' block. Next 3 columns '.' block. Looking at given output first three rows: ". . . A A A . . ." Yes matches. Rows 3-5 correspond to second input row: . M M Thus first block '.' (cols0-2), then M block (cols3-5), then M block (cols6-8). Output rows 3-5: ". . . M M M M M M" Wait that's 9 columns: first three '.' then six M? Actually they show ". . . M M M M M M" which is 3 '.' then 6 M. That would be two M blocks adjacent: each 3 columns, total 6 M. Good. Rows 6-8 correspond to third input row: W A . Thus first block W (cols0-2) => "W W W". Next A block (cols3-5) => "A A A". Last '.' block (cols6-8) => ". . .". Output rows 6-8: "W W W A A A . . .". Yes. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input: ". B ." ". A O" "W W ." We need distinct non-'.' colors: B, A, O, W. That's 4 distinct. So N = 4. Each cell expands to 4x4 block. Input grid 3x3 => output 12x12. We must produce output grid with each cell replaced by 4x4 block of its color. Let's construct. Define rows of output: for each input row i (0..2), we produce 4 rows (i*4 to i*4+3). Within each row, for each input column j (0..2), we produce 4 columns of that cell's color. Let's list input matrix: Row0: col0 '.' ; col1 'B' ; col2 '.' Row1: col0 '.' ; col1 'A' ; col2 'O' Row2: col0 'W' ; col1 'W' ; col2 '.' Now produce output. We'll create 12 rows. Rows 0-3 correspond to input row0. Each of these rows will be: 4 '.' then 4 'B' then 4 '.'. Thus rows 0-3: " . . . . B B B B . . . . " (spaces between characters). Need 12 columns. Rows 0-3 identical. Rows 4-7 correspond to input row1: pattern '.' block, 'A' block, 'O' block. Thus each row: 4 '.' then 4 ' ... [492 chars truncated]
See: A 3-row grid composed entirely of yellow (Y) and black (.) cells. The middle row (row 1) is solid yellow. Rows 0 and 2 alternate between Y and . in a checkerboard pattern, with opposite phases — where row 0 has Y, row 2 has ., and vice versa. The grid width varies but is always odd for rows starting with Y and can be even or odd otherwise.
Do: Some yellow cells are recolored to magenta (M); black cells are never changed. Apply the following rules based on column index (0-based): 1. Middle row (row 1): Replace Y with M at every column that is divisible by 3 (columns 0, 3, 6, 9, ...). 2. For rows 0 and 2, the rule depends on whether the row starts with Y or with .: - If the row starts with Y: Replace Y with M at every column divisible by 6 (columns 0, 6, 12, 18, ...). - If the row starts with .: Replace Y with M at every column where column mod 6 equals 3 (columns 3, 9, 15, 21, ...). All other cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid is always exactly 3 rows tall. The width varies across instances. The coordinate system is 0-indexed with row 0 at the top and column 0 at the left. The only colors present are yellow (Y) and black (.), with magenta (M) introduced by the transformation. No cells outside the grid boundary are involved.
"A marching band performs a parade where every third drummer strikes a magenta cymbal."
120b: k=1
See: A three-lane parade route stretches across the town. The center lane is packed shoulder-to-shoulder with yellow-uniformed marchers. The outer two lanes have marchers spaced out in an alternating pattern — where one lane has a marcher, the other has an empty gap, like two interlocking combs.
Do: A drumbeat sounds every three steps along the center lane, and each marcher standing on that beat swaps their yellow uniform for a magenta one. The outer lanes hear a slower rhythm — a cymbal crash every six steps. But the two outer lanes are offset from each other: whichever lane has a marcher standing at the start of the route hears the crash on the downbeat, while the lane that begins with a gap hears it on the off-beat, halfway between crashes. Wherever a crash lands on an occupied position, that marcher also turns magenta. Empty gaps stay empty — you can't dye what isn't there.
Grid: The parade route is always exactly three lanes wide (top to bottom) but varies in length. The center lane is always full. The top and bottom lanes alternate presence and absence in opposite lockstep. Only yellow marchers can turn magenta; the black gaps between them are just open road.
We need to decode puzzle. The description: three-lane parade route (grid 3 rows). Center lane always full of Y (yellow). Outer lanes have alternating pattern: one lane has a marcher (Y) then gap (.) then Y etc, the other lane opposite (gap then Y). So pattern like top row: . Y . Y . Y ... bottom row: Y . Y . Y . ... or vice versa. Transformation: drumbeat every three steps along center lane: each marcher standing on that beat swaps Y to M (magenta). So in center row, positions that are multiples of 3? Starting at step 0? "every three steps along the center lane" likely means positions 0,3,6,...? Let's examine example 1. Example 1 Input: Let's write rows. Row1: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" (length 13?) Actually count: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y = 13? Let's count: positions 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 Y. So length 13. Row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" (13 Y's) Row3: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." (13) Output rows: Row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Row2: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Let's analyze transformation. Center row (row2) input all Y. Output: M at positions? Output row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. So M at positions 0,3,6,9,12 (0-index). That's every 3 steps starting at 0. Good. Now outer rows: Row1 input pattern Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starting with Y). Output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. So M at positions 0,6,12? Actually output row1: positions:0 M,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 M,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 M. So M at 0,6,12. That's every 6 steps? Wait pattern: crash every six steps, offset depending on lane start. For top lane, it starts with Y (occupied). So it gets crash on downbeat (i.e., at positions 0,6,12...). Indeed M at those positions. For bottom lane (row3) input pattern . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starts with .). Output row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y .". M at positions 3,9? Let's see: positions:0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 . . So M at 3 and 9 (and maybe 15 if longer). That's offset by 3 (half of 6) relative to top lane. So rule matches description: crash every 6 steps, lane that starts with a marcher gets crash at positions 0,6,12,... lane that starts with gap gets crash at positions 3,9,15,... Thus transformation: For each cell that is Y (yellow) in any row, we may turn to M if its column index satisfies certain condition: For middle row: index %3 ==0. For top row: if top row starts with Y (i.e., first cell Y), then index %6 ==0 else index %6 ==3? Actually for top row in example, starts with Y, so M at indices 0,6,12 => index %6 ==0. For bottom row, starts with . so M at indices 3,9 => index %6 ==3. Thus rule: For outer rows, M if (index %6 == offset) where offset = 0 if cell at index 0 is Y, else offset = 3. Equivalent to (index+ (if start with . then 3 else 0)) %6 ==0? Actually offset = (start with .) ? 3 : 0. Now test input: Test Input: Row1: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." Row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" Row3: "Y . Y . ... [3047 chars truncated]
"A colony of golden cells stretches across three tissue layers. The central artery pulses strongest, and at regular intervals a mutation blooms magenta — twice as often along the artery as in the capillaries above and below, where the infection surfaces only at every other pulse point, always aligned with the artery's rhythm."
120b: k=3
See: Three horizontal layers of golden tissue with a dense central artery and sparser capillary rows flanking it in alternating patterns.
Do: A magenta mutation erupts periodically along the artery. In the flanking capillaries, the same mutation appears at half the frequency, landing on whichever golden cells coincide with every second arterial eruption.
Grid: Three rows. The central row is fully golden. The outer rows alternate golden and empty in opposite phase. Magenta replaces certain golden cells at periodic intervals.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: Y=yellow, M=magenta, . = black (empty). Input grids have three rows. The central row fully Y (all yellow). Outer rows have alternating Y and . pattern, opposite phase: first example input row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starts Y). Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starts .). So pattern alternating. Output: some Y become M (magenta) according to rule. Let's map positions. Example1: width? Input row1 length: let's count: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 13? Actually sequence: Y (1) space . (2) Y (3) . (4) Y (5) . (6) Y (7) . (8) Y (9) . (10) Y (11) . (12) Y (13). So 13 columns. Row2: all Y length 13. Row3: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." also 13. Output row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M". Let's list columns 1-13: 1 M,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 M,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y,12 .,13 M. So M appears at columns 1,7,13. Those are every 6 columns? Starting at 1 then +6 =7 then +6=13. So period 6. Row2 output: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Columns: 1 M,2 Y,3 Y,4 M,5 Y,6 Y,7 M,8 Y,9 Y,10 M,11 Y,12 Y,13 M. So M at columns 1,4,7,10,13. That's period 3? Actually start 1 then +3 =4 then +3=7 etc. So every 3 columns. Row3 output: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Columns: 1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 M,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 M,11 .,12 Y,13 . . M at columns 4,10. That's every 6 columns offset by 3? Starting at 4 then +6=10. Observation: central row (full Y) gets M at every 3 columns (period 3). Outer rows get M at every 6 columns, but offset such that they align with every second arterial eruption (central row). The description: "magenta mutation erupts periodically along the artery. In the flanking capillaries, the same mutation appears at half the frequency, landing on whichever golden cells coincide with every second arterial eruption." Interpretation: central row is artery, outer rows are capillaries. Magenta appears on central row at some period (maybe every 3 cells). Then on outer rows, appears at half that frequency (i.e., every 6 cells) but only where outer row has Y (golden) and aligns with every second central M (i.e., positions where central M occurs at positions that are multiples of 6? Actually central M at columns 1,4,7,10,13. Every second central M would be columns 1,7,13? That's period 6 offset 1. Indeed outer row M at columns 1,7,13 for top row, and columns 4,10 for bottom row (since bottom row pattern offset). So rule: central row M at period p (maybe 3). Outer rows M at period 2p (6) but aligned with central M positions that also have Y in outer row. Now check Example2. Input row1: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." Length? Let's count: pattern . Y repeated, starting with . . So columns 1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 Y? Actually given string: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y .". That's 11? Let's count tokens: .(1) Y(2) .(3) Y(4) .(5) Y(6) .(7) Y(8) .(9) Y(10) .(11). So 11 columns. Row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" length 11 all Y. Row3: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" length 11 starting Y. Output row1: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M ... [6515 chars truncated]
"Three bands of golden stars stretch across the ecliptic. The central band is a dense river of light, while the upper and lower bands blink in alternating patterns — where one shines, the other is dark. At regular intervals along the central band, a star flares magenta. The outer bands experience the same phenomenon but at half the frequency, with flares only where a star burns at the right orbital resonance."
120b: k=1
See: Three horizontal bands of golden stars: a continuous central band and two outer bands with alternating stars and voids in opposite phase.
Do: Magenta flares erupt periodically in the central band. The outer bands flare at double the interval, only on stars positioned at the resonant points.
Grid: Three rows. Center row solid golden. Outer rows alternate golden/dark oppositely. Magenta replaces golden at regular intervals — twice as dense in the center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3 rows. Let's write example1 input rows (I'll index columns). Input: Row0: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" So pattern Y . repeated, length? Count: appears 13? Let's count: Y (1) space . (2) Y (3) . (4) Y (5) . (6) Y (7) . (8) Y (9) . (10) Y (11) . (12) Y (13). So 13 columns. Row1: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" all Y, 13 columns. Row2: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." pattern . Y repeated, length 13. Output rows: Row0: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Row1: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Row2: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Let's compare positions. We need to see where M appears. In row0 input had Y at positions 0,2,4,... even indices (0-based). Output row0: M at positions 0,6,12? Let's list columns 0-12. Input row0: 0 Y 1 . 2 Y 3 . 4 Y 5 . 6 Y 7 . 8 Y 9 . 10 Y 11 . 12 Y Output row0: 0 M 1 . 2 Y 3 . 4 Y 5 . 6 M 7 . 8 Y 9 . 10 Y 11 . 12 M So M replaces Y at positions 0,6,12 (every 6 columns). That's interval 6. Row1 input all Y. Output row1: M at positions 0,3,6,9,12? Let's see: output row1: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M". So pattern M at 0,3,6,9,12 (every 3). Row2 input: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (Y at odd positions 1,3,5,7,9,11). Output row2: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y .". M at positions 3 and 9? Let's list: col0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 . So M at 3 and 9 (every 6 starting offset 3). So rule: central row (row1) gets M at every 3 columns (i.e., double density compared to outer rows which get every 6). Outer rows: top row gets M at columns where (col mod 6 ==0). Bottom row gets M at columns where (col mod 6 ==3). That matches description: central band flares more frequently (twice as dense). Outer bands flare at double interval, only on stars positioned at resonant points (maybe offset). The pattern of alternating stars in outer rows: top row stars at even columns, bottom row stars at odd columns. The resonant points are where the star aligns with central row's star? Let's think: central row all stars, so resonant points maybe every other star? But we have offset. Thus rule: For each column, if central row has Y (always), we place M at that column in central row at a regular interval: every N columns where N = something (maybe 3). For outer rows, we place M at positions where central row also has M? Not exactly: In example, central row M at 0,3,6,9,12. Top row M at 0,6,12 (subset of central M positions where column index mod 6 ==0). Bottom row M at 3,9 (subset where column index mod 6 ==3). So outer rows get M at every other central M, offset. Thus algorithm: Determine period = length of row /? In example length 13, central M period 3 columns (i.e., every 3 columns). Outer rows period 6 columns, offset top 0, bottom 3. Now test input: Provided test input grid (different size). Let's parse. Test Input: Row0: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." Let's count columns. Sequence . Y repeated, starting with . then Y, total? Let's count tokens: . (0) Y(1) .(2) Y(3) .(4) Y(5) .(6) Y(7) .(8) Y(9) .(10) ... [3835 chars truncated]
"Three tidal rows of golden buoys mark a shipping channel. The center line is packed without gaps, while the port and starboard lines alternate buoys with open water, each offsetting the other. A lighthouse beam sweeps the channel, painting certain buoys magenta — striking the center line most often and the flanking lines only where a buoy drifts into every second beam rotation."
120b: k=1
See: Three horizontal lines of golden buoys: a solid center channel marker flanked by two alternating lines with buoys and gaps in opposite arrangement.
Do: A periodic lighthouse beam turns some golden buoys magenta. The center line is swept most often; flanking lines are caught at half the frequency, only where buoys sit at the right positions.
Grid: Three rows. Center row all golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty in antiphase. Magenta replaces golden at regular spacings.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows? Example 1 Input lines: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" That's 13 columns? Let's count: pattern Y . repeated, starting Y, ending Y? Actually sequence: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y => that's 13 items (Y . repeated 6 times =12 plus final Y =13). Row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 13 Ys. Row3: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." that's 13 items starting . ending . (alternating). So three rows. Output rows: Row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Row2: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Let's map positions. Let's index columns 0-12. Input row1 pattern: Y at even indices (0,2,4,...,12). Row3 pattern: Y at odd indices (1,3,5,...,11). Row2 all Y. Output: Row1: M at columns 0,6,12? Let's see: output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. So M at col0, col6, col12. Yes every 6 columns? spacing 6. Row2: M at col0,3,6,9,12? Actually output row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. That's M at 0,3,6,9,12. So every 3 columns. Row3: M at col3,9? Output row3: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . => M at col3 and col9. So every 6 but offset? Row3 had Y at odd positions; M appears where? col3 (odd) and col9 (odd). So pattern: central row (row2) gets M at every 3 columns starting at 0. Outer rows get M at every 6 columns, but row1 at 0,6,12 (starting 0) and row3 at 3,9 (starting 3). So offset half period. Interpretation: "Three horizontal lines of golden buoys: a solid center channel marker flanked by two alternating lines with buoys and gaps in opposite arrangement." That's the input: center row all Y (golden buoys). Outer rows alternating Y and . (gaps) opposite phase. "What to do: A periodic lighthouse beam turns some golden buoys magenta. The center line is swept most often; flanking lines are caught at half the frequency, only where buoys sit at the right positions." Thus rule: For each row, replace some Y with M according to a periodic pattern: central row every N (maybe 3) columns; outer rows every 2N (6) columns, but offset for bottom row. General: The period seems to be 3 columns for central row. For outer rows, period 6, with top row offset 0, bottom row offset 3 (i.e., half period shift). So basically a "beam" moving across columns, hitting central row each step, outer rows only when beam aligns with their Y positions (since they have gaps). The beam moves with period 3? Let's test: beam positions columns 0,3,6,9,12... At each beam position, central row Y becomes M. For outer rows, only if there is a Y at that column (i.e., not a gap). Top row has Y at even columns (0,2,4,...). Beam at 0,3,6,9,12: intersect Y at 0,6,12 (since 3,9 are odd -> top row has .). So M at 0,6,12. Bottom row has Y at odd columns (1,3,5,...). Beam at 0,3,6,9,12: intersect Y at 3,9 (since 0,6,12 are even -> .). So M at 3,9. That matches. Thus rule: Identify the "beam" positions: columns where central row Y is turned to M. The beam repeats every 3 columns (i.e., every third column starting at column 0). So replace Y ... [2884 chars truncated]
"Three traces of golden circuitry run across a board. The center bus is a solid conductor, while the upper and lower signal lines alternate pads and gaps in complementary patterns. A clock pulse fires at a base frequency, energizing certain pads on the center bus to magenta. The outer traces respond to a divided clock — they only energize at half the tick rate, where a pad coincides with the slower signal."
120b: k=2
See: Three parallel traces of golden pads: a solid center bus and two outer signal lines with alternating pads and gaps, offset from each other.
Do: A clock pulse converts golden pads to magenta at regular intervals along the center bus. The outer traces fire at a frequency-divided rate, activating only pads aligned with every other pulse.
Grid: Three rows. Center row fully golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty in opposite phase. Magenta replaces golden periodically — the center at base frequency, outer rows at half frequency.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have three rows. Input rows: center row fully Y (yellow). Outer rows have alternating Y and . (black) in opposite phase: first outer row pattern . Y . Y ... second outer row Y . Y . ... In example1 input: Row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starts Y then .) Row2: all Y. Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starts .). Output: Row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M (so some Y become M at positions where? Let's index columns starting 0. Input row1: Y at even indices (0,2,4...). Output row1: M at 0, then . at1, Y at2, . at3, Y at4, . at5, M at6, .7, Y8, .9, Y10, .11, M12. So M appears at positions 0,6,12... every 6 columns? pattern period 6? Let's see row2: Input all Y. Output row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. So M at columns 0,3,6,9,12... every 3 columns. Row3: Input . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (Y at odd indices). Output: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . So M at columns 3,9,... every 6? Actually positions where input Y and output M: column3 (input Y), column9 (input Y). So pattern offset. Interpretation: center row (bus) gets M at base frequency: every 3 columns? In example1, center row length 13? Actually input row2 length 13? Let's count: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" that's 13 Y's. Output row2 length 13 with M at 0,3,6,9,12 => every 3 columns starting at 0. So base frequency period = 3. Outer rows get M at half frequency: i.e., every 6 columns, but offset such that they align with every other pulse of center. Also outer rows are opposite phase: first outer row (top) has Y at even positions; second outer row (bottom) has Y at odd positions. In output, top row M at 0,6,12 (positions where Y originally). bottom row M at 3,9 (positions where Y originally). So they are offset by 3 relative to top. Thus rule: For each column, there is a clock pulse every 3 columns (starting at column 0). At those columns, center row Y becomes M. Outer rows: only those pulses where the outer row has Y (i.e., pad present) and pulse occurs on every other pulse (i.e., every 6 columns) cause conversion to M. So effectively, outer rows get M at columns where (col mod 6 == 0) for top row, and (col mod 6 == 3) for bottom row, assuming top row has Y at even columns (0 mod2) and bottom row Y at odd columns (1 mod2). That matches. Check example2. Example2 Input: Row1: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y .": length 11? Actually pattern . Y repeated, starting . at col0. Row2: all Y length 11. Row3: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y": starts Y at col0. Output Row1: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M .": M at col3 and 9? Let's index: columns 0 '.';1 Y;2 '.';3 M;4 '.';5 Y;6 '.';7 Y;8 '.';9 M;10 '.' . So M at 3,9 (col mod6 ==3). Top row originally had Y at odd columns (1,3,5,7,9). M appears at 3 and 9 (where Y present). So pattern matches top row (which in this example is opposite phase compared to example1). So top row Y at odd columns, M at columns where col mod6 ==3 (since start offset). Bottom row output: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y": Wait output row3: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y". Let's list colu ... [4424 chars truncated]
"Three threads of golden fate are woven on the Loom of Moirai. The central thread is unbroken destiny, while the upper and lower threads alternate presence and absence in mirrored patterns. At measured intervals, the Fates dip their needle in magenta ichor — marking the central thread most often, and touching the outer threads only where fate and thread align at every second dip of the needle."
120b: k=1
See: Three golden threads on a cosmic loom: a solid center thread and two flanking threads that alternate woven/unwoven in opposite pattern.
Do: Magenta ichor marks the threads at regular intervals. The center thread is marked most densely; the outer threads receive marks at half the rate, only where thread is present at the right interval.
Grid: Three rows. Center row solid golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty oppositely. Magenta replaces some golden cells at periodic spacings.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows? Example 1 Input lines: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" That's 13 cells? Let's count: Y,.,Y,.,Y,.,Y,.,Y,.,Y,.,Y = 13. Second row: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" = 13 Y's. Third row: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." = 13 cells. So pattern: middle row all Y (solid). Top row: Y at odd positions (1,3,5...), '.' at even positions. Bottom row: '.' at odd, Y at even (alternating opposite). Output grid same dimensions 13. Output row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Let's map positions 1-13: 1 M,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 M,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y,12 .,13 M Row2 output: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Positions: 1 M,2 Y,3 Y,4 M,5 Y,6 Y,7 M,8 Y,9 Y,10 M,11 Y,12 Y,13 M Row3 output: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Positions:1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 M,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 M,11 .,12 Y,13 . Observations: Magenta M appears replacing some Y cells at regular intervals. In row2 (solid), M at positions 1,4,7,10,13 i.e. every 3 cells starting at 1. So period 3. In row1 (alternating Y . Y . ...), M appears at positions 1,7,13 (every 6? Actually positions 1,7,13 difference 6). That's every 6 cells, which is double period because outer rows have half density of Y. Also note that M only placed where there is Y originally (since row1 had Y at odd positions). At positions 1,7,13 are odd, yes Y originally. So M replaces Y at those positions. Row3 (alternating opposite), M appears at positions 4,10 (positions where Y originally? Row3 had Y at even positions: 2,4,6,8,10,12. M at 4 and 10, which are even, yes Y originally). So pattern: M placed every 6 cells starting at offset 4? Actually row3 M at 4 and 10 (difference 6). So also period 6 but offset different due to phase. Thus rule: For central row (full), replace every third Y with M starting at first column. For outer rows, replace every sixth Y with M, aligning such that overall pattern forms three parallel threads with M marks at regular intervals: central thread denser (every 3), outer threads half density (every 6). Offsets ensure they are aligned vertically? Let's see columns where M appear across rows: Column1: M in row1, row2, not row3 (since row3 has .). Column4: row1 ., row2 M, row3 M. Column7: row1 M, row2 M, row3 . . Column10: row1 ., row2 M, row3 M. Column13: row1 M, row2 M, row3 . So pattern of M across rows forms three threads: central column positions 1,4,7,10,13 have M in middle row always. Outer rows have M at alternating columns offset by 3? Actually top row M at 1,7,13 (every 6). Bottom row M at 4,10 (every 6). So they are offset by 3 relative to top. Thus rule: Starting from leftmost column, place M in middle row every 3 cells. For top row, place M at those same columns where middle row has M and top row also has Y (i.e., every 3 but only on Y cells, which are at odd positions). That would give M at columns 1,4,7,10,13 but top row only has Y at odd columns, so M at 1,7,13 (since 4,10 are even). For bottom row, similarly M at columns where middle row M and bottom row Y ... [3650 chars truncated]
"Three lines of golden-costumed dancers perform across a stage. The center line holds a continuous chorus, while the front and back lines step in and out in alternating beats, each mirroring the other's rests. A choreographer's count triggers certain dancers to unfurl magenta ribbons — the center line reveals them most often, while the outer lines flourish only at every second count, wherever a dancer is mid-step at that moment."
120b: k=2
See: Three lines of golden dancers: a full center chorus and two outer lines that alternate dancing and resting in opposite rhythm.
Do: Magenta ribbons are unfurled at a steady count. The center chorus unfurls most frequently; the outer lines do so at half the rate, only where a dancer is active at the right beat.
Grid: Three rows. Center row all golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty in antiphase. Magenta replaces golden at regular intervals — denser in the center.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with 3 rows, many columns. Colors: Y (yellow) and . (black) in inputs. Output introduces M (magenta) replacing some Y's. Description: "Three lines of golden dancers: a full center chorus and two outer lines that alternate dancing and resting in opposite rhythm." So center row all Y (golden). Outer rows alternate Y and . in antiphase (i.e., first outer row pattern Y . Y . ... ; second outer row . Y . Y ...). Indeed example1 input: Row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starts Y). Row2: all Y. Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starts .). That's antiphase. Output: "Magenta ribbons are unfurled at a steady count. The center chorus unfurls most frequently; the outer lines do so at half the rate, only where a dancer is active at the right beat." Interpretation: Replace some Y's with M according to a periodic pattern. Center row gets M at every other? Let's examine example1 output rows. Example1 output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M Positions (index starting 0): 0 M (was Y) 1 . unchanged 2 Y (was Y) 3 . unchanged 4 Y (was Y) 5 . unchanged 6 M (was Y) 7 . unchanged 8 Y (was Y) 9 . unchanged 10 Y (was Y) 11 . unchanged 12 M (was Y) So pattern: M at positions 0,6,12 ... every 6 columns? Input length 13? Actually row length 13? Let's count: Input row1 length 13? "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 13 elements (alternating). Output row1 also 13. M appears at positions 0,6,12 (every 6). So period 6. Row2 (center): M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Positions: 0 M,1 Y,2 Y,3 M,4 Y,5 Y,6 M,7 Y,8 Y,9 M,10 Y,11 Y,12 M. So M at positions 0,3,6,9,12 => every 3 columns. So center row M every 3. Row3 output: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . Positions: 0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 . . M at positions 3,9 (every 6) same as row1 but offset? Row1 had M at 0,6,12. Row3 has M at 3,9 (shifted by 3). So outer rows have M every 6 columns, but only where there is Y (active dancer). Row3 pattern of Y's at odd positions (1,5,7,11). M appears at position 3 (which is . originally? Wait row3 position3 originally Y? Let's check input row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (positions: 0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y,12 .). So at position3 there is Y, becomes M. At position9 Y becomes M. So yes M replaces Y at those positions. Row1 had Y at even positions (0,2,4,6,8,10,12). M at 0,6,12 (positions where Y). So outer rows each have M every 6 columns, but offset such that they are in antiphase (shifted by 3). So rule: For outer rows, replace Y with M at positions where (col index mod 6 == row-specific offset) and Y present. Center row: replace Y with M at positions where col index mod 3 == 0 (i.e., every third column starting at 0). That matches example1: length 13, M at 0,3,6,9,12. Now check example2. Example2 input rows length? Row1: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." that's 11? Let's count: pattern . Y repeated, starting . ends .? Actually string: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." that's 11 elements (positions 0 .,1 Y,2 . ... [4638 chars truncated]
"Three strata of golden ore run through a cliff face. The central vein is a solid seam, while the upper and lower layers alternate ore deposits with barren rock in complementary patterns. At periodic fault lines, pressure transforms golden ore into magenta crystal — the central vein crystallizes most frequently, while the outer strata transform only at every second fault, wherever ore is exposed at that interval."
120b: k=1
See: Three horizontal strata of golden ore: a solid central vein flanked by two layers alternating ore and barren rock in opposite arrangement.
Do: Magenta crystals form at periodic fault intervals. The central vein crystallizes most often; outer strata crystallize at half the rate, only where ore deposits align with every other fault.
Grid: Three rows. Center row solid golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty in antiphase. Magenta replaces golden at regular spacings — twice as dense in the center.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3 rows? Example 1 input appears 3 rows of length maybe 13? Let's count: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 13 elements (alternating Y and .). Row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 13 Ys. Row3: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." also 13. Output rows: Row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" length 13. Row2: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M". Row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Observations: Central row (row2) originally all Y, output has M at positions 1,4,7,10,13? Let's index 1-13. Row2 output: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. So pattern: M at positions 1,4,7,10,13 (every 3). That's twice density? central row gets M at every third cell starting at 1. Input had Y everywhere, output replaces some Y with M. Outer rows: Row1 input pattern Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (Y at odd positions, . at even). Output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. So at odd positions (1,3,5,7,9,11,13) originally Y, now some become M. Which ones? positions 1,7,13 become M. That's every 6? Actually positions 1,7,13 are spaced 6 apart. That's half the density of central row (central had every 3). So outer rows get M at every 6 positions, aligned with central? central M at 1,4,7,10,13. Outer M at 1,7,13 (subset of central positions where outer row has Y). So rule: place M at positions where central row has M and outer rows have Y? But also outer rows have . at even positions, they stay . unchanged. Row3 input: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." (Y at even positions). Output row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y .". M at positions 4 and 10? Actually positions: index 1 '.';2 Y;3 '.';4 M;5 '.';6 Y;7 '.';8 Y;9 '.';10 M;11 '.';12 Y;13 '.'. So M at positions 4 and 10, which correspond to central M positions 4 and 10 where row3 has Y (since row3 Y at even positions). So outer rows get M at central M positions where they have Y. Thus rule: Identify central row (row2) which is solid (all same color). Replace its cells with M at regular interval: every third cell starting at first column (i.e., positions where (col-1) mod 3 ==0). Then for outer rows, replace Y with M at those same columns where central row got M, but only if outer cell is Y (i.e., not .). So basically overlay pattern of M on central row at period 3, and propagate to other rows where they have Y. Now test input: Provided after example: "Test Input: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" Let's count columns. Row1: pattern . Y repeated? Starting with . then Y etc. Let's count: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." That's 17? Let's count tokens: 1 '.';2 Y;3 '.';4 Y;5 '.';6 Y;7 '.';8 Y;9 '.';10 Y;11 '.';12 Y;13 '.';14 Y;15 '.';16 Y;17 '.' . Yes 17 columns. Row2: 17 Ys (all Y). Row3: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's Y at odd positions, . at even, length 17. We need to apply rule: central row (row2) replace Y with M at positions where (col-1) mod 3 ==0 (i.e., columns 1,4,7,10,13,16?). Let's compute for 17 columns: columns 1,4,7,10,13,16. Also column 19 ... [1562 chars truncated]
"A baker lays out three rows of golden dough balls on a long sheet. The middle row is packed solid, the top and bottom are spaced with gaps like lattice crust. She dabs saffron glaze on every third roll in the center row, and garnishes the outer rows more sparingly — only where the glaze pattern and the lattice openings align just so."
120b: k=1
See: Three rows of golden pastries on a baking sheet: a dense center row and two lattice rows with alternating gaps, offset from each other.
Do: Saffron glaze (magenta) is dabbed on the center row at a steady interval. The outer rows receive glaze at half the rate, placed only on rolls that sit at the intersections of the glazing rhythm.
Grid: Three rows of golden and empty cells. Center row is fully filled. Outer rows alternate in opposite phase. Some golden cells turn magenta at regular spacings.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3 rows. Let's parse example 1. Input rows (I'll index columns). Represent as characters: '.' black, Y yellow. Row0: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (looks like alternating Y and . starting with Y, length? count: let's count: pattern Y . repeated 7? Actually given: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 13? Let's count: positions 0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 Y => 13 columns. Row1: Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (all Y) length 13. Row2: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starts with ., then Y alternating, length 13) Output rows: Row0: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M Row1: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Row2: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . Let's compare. Observation: Center row (row1) originally all Y, output has M at some positions, Y elsewhere. Pattern: M at columns 0,3,6,9,12? Let's see: output row1: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. That's M at positions 0,3,6,9,12 (every 3 columns). So interval 3. Row0 originally Y at even columns (0,2,4,...). Output row0: M at columns 0,6,12? Actually output row0: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. Let's list columns: 0 M,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 M,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 M. So M at 0,6,12 (every 6?). That's half the rate compared to center row (every 3 vs every 6). Also only placed where there is a Y originally (since row0 only has Y at even columns). Indeed at 0,6,12 are Y positions originally (even). So rule: center row gets M at interval 3 (steady). Outer rows get M at half rate (interval 6) but only at positions where they have Y and also align with "intersections of the glazing rhythm". The phrase "intersections of the glazing rhythm" maybe means positions where the outer rows' Y align with the center row's M positions? Let's check: center M at 0,3,6,9,12. Outer row0 M at 0,6,12 which are subset of those (every other). Row2 output: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . . Let's list: columns: 0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 .,13? Wait length 13, column12 ?. Output row2: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." That's 13 columns: positions:0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 . . So M at 3,9 (every 6 offset by 3). Those correspond to center M positions 3,9 (every other). So outer rows get M at every other center M, but only where they have Y (since row2 has Y at odd columns). Indeed row2 Y at odd columns (1,3,5,7,9,11). M placed at 3 and 9 (odd positions that are also center M positions). So rule: For each column where center row gets M (every N columns), outer rows get M if they have Y at that column and also maybe only on every other such column (i.e., half the frequency). But description says outer rows receive glaze at half the rate, placed only on rolls that sit at the intersections of the glazing rhythm. So they get M at half the frequency, aligned with center row's M positions, but only where outer row has Y. Thus algorithm: Determine period = distance between M in center row. In example, period = 3 (since center row length 13, M at 0,3,6,9,12). How derived? ... [6311 chars truncated]
"Three strings of a golden harp vibrate in unison. The middle string rings brightest, and every third harmonic resonates into magenta overtones. The outer strings, tuned in antiphase, catch that same resonance but only at every other harmonic node — their magenta shimmer is sparser, appearing where their vibration peaks meet the central string's cycle."
120b: k=2
See: Three horizontal strings of golden notes, the center one continuous, the outer two plucked in alternating on-off patterns that mirror each other inversely.
Do: Magenta overtones appear on the center string at every third position. The outer strings develop magenta only at every sixth position, wherever their active notes coincide with the deeper resonance cycle.
Grid: Three rows. Center row all golden. Top and bottom rows alternate golden/silent in opposite phase. Magenta replaces golden at periodic intervals — denser in the center, sparser on the edges.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: Y=yellow, . = black, M=magenta. Input grids have three rows. Example1 Input rows (I'll index columns). Row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (alternating Y and . starting with Y). Row2: all Y (13 Y). Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (alternating starting with .). So top and bottom rows are opposite phase alternating. Output rows: Row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M Row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Row3: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . Observations: Center row: originally all Y, output has M at positions 1,4,7,10,13? Let's check: length 13. Output row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M. So pattern: M then two Y, repeat. So every third position starting at 1 (index1) is M. That's consistent with description: magenta appears on center string at every third position. Top row: originally Y at odd positions (1,3,5...). Output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. Let's list positions 1-13: 1 M,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 M,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y,12 .,13 M. So M appears at positions 1,7,13 (every 6 positions). Indeed every sixth position (starting at 1) where original had Y (active note). The pattern: positions 1,7,13 are M. Those correspond to every 6th (1+6k). So rule: on outer rows, replace Y with M at positions that are multiples of 6 offset 1, but only where original had Y (active). Since outer rows have alternating Y and ., the positions where Y occurs are odd indices. Among those, every 6th overall column (i.e., columns 1,7,13) are Y, so become M. That matches. Bottom row: originally . Y . Y ... starting with . at col1. Output row3: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . So M at positions 4,10? Let's list: col1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 M,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 M,11 .,12 Y,13 . . So M at columns 4 and 10 (every 6th starting at 4). Indeed because bottom row's Y are at even columns (2,4,6,8,10,12). Among those, every 6th column overall (col4,10) get M. So rule: outer rows: replace Y with M at columns where column index ≡ 1 mod 6 for top row (since Y at odd columns) and column index ≡ 4 mod 6 for bottom row (since Y at even columns). Equivalent: every 6th position of the alternating pattern, i.e., every sixth column overall where there is a Y. Now Example2. Input rows: Row1: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (length 11?) Actually given: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y .". That's 11 columns, starting with . then Y alternating, ending with .? Let's count: positions:1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 . So Y at even columns. Row2: Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (11 Y) Row3: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starting Y at col1, alternating, length 11, ending Y at col11). So Y at odd columns. Output rows: Row1: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . (positions: 1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 M,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 M,11 .) So M at columns 4 and 10 (every 6th starting at 4). That's consistent with top row (which originally had Y at even columns). So replace Y at columns 4,10 with M. Row2: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y (positions: 1 M,2 Y,3 Y,4 M,5 Y,6 Y,7 M,8 Y,9 Y,10 M,11 Y). So M at columns 1,4,7,10 (every th ... [2870 chars truncated]
"Runners in golden jerseys line three lanes of a track. The middle lane is packed shoulder to shoulder, while the inner and outer lanes stagger runners in offset formation. A photographer's strobe fires at fixed intervals, catching middle-lane runners in magenta flash. The outer lanes are lit only by every second strobe burst, and only the runners standing in those positions get bathed in magenta."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Three lanes of golden runners: a full center lane and two flanking lanes with staggered positions, offset from one another.
Do: A periodic strobe paints certain runners magenta. The center lane catches it most often. The outer lanes catch it at half the frequency, only where runners happen to stand at the right beat.
Grid: Three horizontal rows. Center is solid golden. Outer rows alternate golden and empty in opposite patterns. Magenta replaces some golden cells at regular intervals.
"A golden sandstorm sweeps across three atmospheric layers. The middle jet stream is dense and unbroken, while the upper and lower currents carry sand in alternating gusts and calm pockets, flipped between the two. At steady intervals, lightning strikes turn sand grains magenta — the jet stream is struck most frequently, while the outer layers are hit only at every other lightning cycle, where their gusts align with the storm's deeper cadence."
120b: k=3
See: Three horizontal bands of golden sand: a solid central jet stream and two flanking bands with alternating sand/clear patches in opposite rhythm.
Do: Lightning periodically transforms golden sand to magenta. The central band is struck at a base interval; the outer bands are struck at double that interval, only where sand is present.
Grid: Three rows. Middle row fully golden. Top and bottom rows alternate golden and black in antiphase. Magenta appears at regular spacings — twice as dense in the center as in the outer rows.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: Y = yellow (golden sand). . = black (maybe empty). M = magenta (transformed). Input rows: three rows. Example1 Input rows (I'll index columns). Row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (alternating Y and . starting with Y). Row2: all Y (full). Row3: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (alternating starting with .). Output rows: Row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. So positions where input had Y become either M or Y. Pattern: M appears at columns 1,7,13? Let's count: columns 1 Y->M, 2 . stays ., 3 Y->Y, 4 . stays .,5 Y->Y,6 . .,7 Y->M,8 . .,9 Y->Y,10 . .,11 Y->Y,12 . .,13 Y->M. So every third Y? Actually positions 1,7,13 are spaced 6 apart. Row length 13? Input length 13. So central row output: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M (row2). Input row2 all Y. Output row2: pattern M Y Y repeated, starting with M at col1, then Y Y, then M at col4, etc. So period 3, with M at positions 1,4,7,10,13... That's every third column. Row3 output: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . . Input row3 had . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . . Output: at columns where input Y, some become M. Which columns? Input Y at col2,4,6,8,10,12. Output: col2 Y (unchanged), col4 M, col6 Y, col8 Y, col10 M, col12 Y. So M at columns 4 and 10 (every 6 columns starting at 4). So pattern: outer rows have M at every 6 columns, central row every 3 columns. Also only where Y present (sand). The description: central band struck at base interval; outer bands at double interval, only where sand present. Thus rule: For each row, replace some Y with M according to periodic pattern. Period for middle row = base interval (maybe 3). For top and bottom rows = double interval (6). Starting offset maybe such that first M appears at first Y in middle row, and for outer rows first M appears at second Y? Let's check example2. Example2 Input rows: Row1: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (starting .). Row2: all Y (length 11?). Row3: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starting Y). Output Row1: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . (M at columns 4 and 10). Input Y at columns 2,4,6,8,10. M at 4 and 10 (every 6 columns starting at 4). Row2 output: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y (M at 1,4,7,10). Row3 output: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y (M at columns1,7?). Input Y at columns1,3,5,7,9,11. Output M at 1,7? also maybe 13 not present. So pattern matches: middle row M every 3 columns starting at 1. Outer rows M every 6 columns starting at column where first Y appears? For top row, first Y at col2, but M at col4 (offset +2). For bottom row, first Y at col1, M at col1 (offset 0). So offset may be such that M appears at first Y of bottom row, but top row offset is 2 columns later (maybe because pattern aligns across rows? Let's examine example1: top row first Y at col1, M at col1 (offset 0). Bottom row first Y at col2, M at col4 (offset +2). So opposite of example2. So offset depends on phase? The description: top and bottom rows alternate golden and black in antiphase. So they are opposite patterns. The M placements maybe aligned verti ... [6198 chars truncated]
"A golden colonnade spans three tiers of an ancient facade. The central frieze is an unbroken band of gilded stone, while the upper and lower tiers alternate columns and open archways in mirrored opposition. At measured intervals a mason sets magenta keystones into the frieze, and in the outer tiers he places them more sparingly — only where a column stands at every second keystone interval."
120b: fail
See: Three horizontal tiers of golden stone: a solid central frieze flanked by two arcaded rows whose columns and openings alternate in opposite phase.
Do: Magenta keystones are set into the central frieze at regular intervals. The outer tiers receive keystones at half that rate, placed only on columns that align with every other central keystone.
Grid: Three rows. Center row solid golden. Top and bottom rows alternate golden/empty oppositely. Magenta replaces golden at periodic intervals — denser in the center.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3 rows. Input patterns: central row solid Y (yellow) all across. Top and bottom rows alternate Y and . (black) in opposite phase: top starts with Y then . then Y etc. Bottom starts with . then Y etc. Indeed example1 input: top row: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (length 13). middle row: all Y (13). bottom row: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (13). Output: top row: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M (so M at positions where top had Y at certain intervals). middle row: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M (so M at positions 0,3,6,9,12? Let's index 0-12. Input middle all Y. Output middle: positions 0 M,1 Y,2 Y,3 M,4 Y,5 Y,6 M,7 Y,8 Y,9 M,10 Y,11 Y,12 M. So pattern: every 3 cells, first becomes M, next two stay Y. So period 3. Top row output: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M. Let's index top input Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y. Output: at positions 0 M (was Y),1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 M (was Y),7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 M. So M at positions 0,6,12 (every 6?). Actually period 6: positions 0,6,12. So top row gets M at half the rate of middle (every 6 vs 3). Also only on columns aligning with every other central keystone. Central keystones at positions 0,3,6,9,12. Every other central keystone would be positions 0,6,12 (skip one each). Those align with top M positions. Good. Bottom row output: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . (from example). Let's index bottom input . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . . Output: positions 0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M (was Y),4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M,10 .,11 Y,12 . . So M at positions 3,9 (maybe also 15 if longer). Those correspond to central keystones at positions 3,9 (the other set). Since bottom row is opposite phase, its columns aligning with every other central keystone (the ones not used by top). So rule: central row: replace every third Y with M (starting at first column). Top row: replace Y with M at positions where central row has M and column index mod 6 ==0? Actually central M at 0,3,6,9,12. Top gets M at 0,6,12 (every other central M). Bottom gets M at 3,9 (the others). Also only where there is Y originally (not .). So pattern. Check example2 to confirm. Example2 input: top row: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . (length 11). bottom row: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y (starts with Y). middle row all Y (11). Output top: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . (M at positions 3,9?). Let's index: positions 0 .,1 Y,2 .,3 M (was Y),4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 M (was Y),10 . . So M at 3,9. Central row output: M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y (M at 0,3,6,9). Bottom row output: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y (M at 0,6?). Let's index bottom input Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y. Output bottom: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y. So M at positions 0 and 6 (and maybe 12 if longer). Indeed central M at 0,3,6,9. Bottom gets M at 0,6 (every other starting at 0). Top gets M at 3,9 (the other set). So consistent. Thus rule: For three rows, middle row all Y (or maybe any color?) but pattern: replace every third cell (starting at first) with M, leaving others unchanged. For top and bottom rows, which are alternating Y and . opposit ... [7986 chars truncated]
"Three ranks of golden-shielded soldiers stand in formation. The center rank holds the unbroken line; the front and rear ranks deploy in staggered positions, each filling the other's gaps. At every third position in the center, a soldier raises a magenta war banner. In the outer ranks, banners appear at only half that frequency — wherever a soldier's position coincides with the deeper rhythm of the battle drums."
120b: k=3
See: Three ranks of golden shields: a solid center line and two staggered outer ranks with alternating soldiers and gaps, offset from each other.
Do: Magenta banners are raised periodically in the center rank. The outer ranks raise banners at double the spacing, only where soldiers are positioned at the right intervals.
Grid: Three rows. Center row all golden. Outer rows alternate golden/empty in antiphase. Magenta replaces golden at regular intervals — the center row most densely.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have three rows. Input patterns: central row all Y (golden). Outer rows have alternating Y and . (black) in antiphase: first outer row pattern: Y . Y . ...? In example1 input first row: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" (starts Y). Third row: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y .". So they are opposite phase. Output: Magenta M replaces some Y in rows. According to description: Magenta banners raised periodically in center rank (most dense). Outer ranks raise banners at double spacing, only where soldiers are positioned at right intervals. Thus we need to replace some Y with M in each row according to periodic intervals. Let's examine example1 output. Input row1: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Output row1: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M Positions (index starting 0): 0 Y->M 1 . stays . 2 Y stays Y 3 . . 4 Y stays Y 5 . . 6 Y -> M 7 . . 8 Y stays Y 9 . . 10 Y stays Y 11 . . 12 Y -> M 13 . . 14 Y? Wait length? Input length 14? Actually given 14? Let's count: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 15? Let's count: positions:0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 .,12 Y,13 .,14 Y. So 15 cells. Output row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" that's 13? Let's count: M(0), .1, Y2, .3, Y4, .5, M6, .7, Y8, .9, Y10, .11, M12. That's 13 cells, missing some? maybe they omitted trailing? Actually maybe output same length but truncated in description. Let's examine pattern: M at positions 0,6,12 (every 6?). So spacing 6 cells (including both Y and .?). The pattern: start at 0 then every 6 cells (0,6,12). That matches "center row most densely" but outer rows have double spacing (i.e., 12?). Let's check row2 (center row) input: all Y length 13? Actually row2: "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 13 Y's. Output row2: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M". So M at positions 0,3,6,9,12 (every 3). So spacing 3. Row3 input: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." length 13? Output row3: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." M at positions 3 and 9 (every 6). So outer rows have spacing 6, center row spacing 3. That matches description: outer rows double spacing of center? Actually center spacing 3, outer 6 (double). Also outer rows only where there is Y (soldier) at that position (since they have alternating Y). Indeed row1 M at positions 0,6,12 where there is Y originally. Row3 M at positions 3,9 where Y originally. Thus rule: For each row, replace Y with M at regular intervals: For middle row interval = 3 (i.e., every third cell starting at 0). For outer rows interval = 6 (every sixth cell starting at 0 for top row, maybe offset for bottom row?). But note bottom row M at positions 3 and 9, not 0,6,12. Because bottom row pattern starts with . at index0, Y at 1, . at2, Y at3. So the first Y is at index1. The M appears at index3 (which is Y) which is offset 2 from start? Let's compute: bottom row Y positions are odd indices (1,3,5,...). M placed at positions where (index mod 6 == 3)? Let's test: index3 mod6=3, index9 mod6=3. So pattern offset 3. For top row Y pos ... [5655 chars truncated]
"Golden spotlights illuminate three rows of a stage. The center row blazes continuously while the front and back rows flicker on and off in alternating patterns, each the inverse of the other. A stage manager periodically swaps certain golden lights for magenta gels — frequently along the center row, and more rarely in the flickering rows, only where a lit lamp falls on the deeper cue cycle."
120b: k=2
See: Three rows of golden stage lights: a fully lit center row and two outer rows that alternate on/off in opposite patterns.
Do: Magenta gels replace golden lights at periodic intervals. The center row changes most often; the outer rows change at half the rate, only on lamps that are lit at the right cue points.
Grid: Three rows. Center all golden. Outer rows alternate golden/dark oppositely. Some golden cells become magenta at regular intervals.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have three rows. Input patterns: outer rows alternate Y and . (black) opposite each other. Center row all Y. Example1 Input rows length? Let's count: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" that's 13? Actually pattern Y . repeated, starting Y, ending Y? Let's count: positions:1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 Y,12 .,13 Y. So length 13. Row2: 13 Y's. Row3: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." length 13, starting ., ending . (alternating opposite to row1). So outer rows are opposite patterns. Output Example1: Row1: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Let's map positions 1-13. Input row1 had Y at odd positions, . at even. Output row1: at positions 1,7,13 become M (magenta) where input Y. Others: at odd positions not M remain Y? Let's see: positions 3,5,9,11 are Y. Indeed output row1: pos3 Y,5 Y,9 Y,11 Y. So some Y turned to M at periodic intervals: positions 1,7,13 (every 6? distance 6). So pattern: every 6 cells starting at 1? 1,7,13 (increment 6). For length 13, that fits. Row2 output: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Input row2 all Y. Output has M at positions 1,4,7,10,13 (every 3? Actually distance 3). Let's list: 1 M,2 Y,3 Y,4 M,5 Y,6 Y,7 M,8 Y,9 Y,10 M,11 Y,12 Y,13 M. So pattern: M at positions where (index-1) mod 3 ==0. So every 3 cells. Row3 output: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Input row3 pattern . Y . Y ... . at even? Actually row3 had . at odd positions, Y at even. Output row3: at positions 4,10 become M (where input Y). Positions 4,10 are Y positions (since even). So M at every 6 cells starting at 4? Let's see positions with Y originally: 2,4,6,8,10,12. M at 4 and 10 (every 6). So similar to row1 but offset. Thus rule: For each row, replace some Y with M at regular intervals. The interval differs per row: outer rows interval 6, center row interval 3. Also outer rows offset: top row start at position1, bottom row start at position4 (i.e., shift by 3). So pattern maybe based on "phase" of alternating pattern. Now Example2. Input Example2 rows length? Row1: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y .": that's 11? Let's count: positions 1 .,2 Y,3 .,4 Y,5 .,6 Y,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 Y,11 . . length 11. Row2: 11 Y's. Row3: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y": length 11, starting Y. Output Row1: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M ." Positions: M at 4 and 10? Let's see: positions 4 M, 10 M. That's every 6 starting at 4. Input row1 had Y at even positions (2,4,6,8,10). M at 4 and 10 (every 6). So matches outer row pattern (interval 6) but offset maybe start at 4 (since top row? Wait earlier top row started at 1). Here top row start at 4. Because length 11 maybe shift. Row2 output: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y" Positions M at 1,4,7,10 (every 3). Same as center row interval 3. Row3 output: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y" Positions M at 1,7? Let's list: output row3: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y". That's length 11. M at positions 1 and 7 (every 6). Input row3 had Y at odd positions (1,3,5,7,9,11). M at 1 and 7 (every 6). So bottom row interval 6 starting at 1. Thus pattern: For outer row ... [6851 chars truncated]
"Three rows of golden marigolds line a garden bed. The center row is planted wall-to-wall, while the border rows alternate marigolds with bare earth, each row offsetting the other's gaps. The gardener walks the rows, replacing certain marigolds with magenta dahlias at a steady pace — planting most densely along the center and more sparingly along the borders, only where a marigold sits at every other planting beat."
120b: k=2
See: Three rows of golden flowers: a solid center row flanked by two rows alternating flowers and bare patches in opposite arrangement.
Do: Magenta dahlias replace golden marigolds at periodic intervals. The center row is replanted most frequently; border rows receive dahlias at half the rate, only where flowers coincide with the longer cycle.
Grid: Three horizontal rows. Center row fully golden. Top and bottom rows alternate golden/empty in antiphase. Magenta replaces some golden cells at measured spacings.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have three rows. Input patterns: top row alternates Y and . starting with Y? Example1 top row: "Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y" length 13? Actually pattern: Y . repeated, starting Y, ending Y? Let's count: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y => that's 13 cells, ends with Y. So pattern: Y at even indices (0,2,4...), . at odd indices. Middle row: all Y (full golden). Bottom row: ". Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y ." pattern starting with . then Y alternating, ending with . (13 cells). So bottom is opposite phase. Output Example1: Top row: "M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M" Let's map positions index 0-12. Input top: Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y Output top: M . Y . Y . M . Y . Y . M So at some Y positions replaced by M (magenta). Which indices? 0 -> M (was Y). 2 -> Y (unchanged). 4 -> Y unchanged. 6 -> M (was Y). 8 -> Y unchanged. 10 -> Y unchanged. 12 -> M (was Y). So pattern: every 6? Actually indices 0,6,12 replaced. That's every 6 cells (period 6). So center row maybe influences. Middle row output: "M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M Y Y M" Input middle: all Y. Output has M at indices 0,3,6,9,12? Let's see: indices 0 M,1 Y,2 Y,3 M,4 Y,5 Y,6 M,7 Y,8 Y,9 M,10 Y,11 Y,12 M. So period 3? Actually M every 3 cells starting at 0. So period 3. Bottom row output: ". Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y ." Input bottom: . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Y . Output bottom: . Y . M . Y . Y . M . Y . Indices 0 . unchanged,1 Y unchanged,2 . unchanged,3 M (was Y),4 . unchanged,5 Y unchanged,6 . unchanged,7 Y unchanged,8 . unchanged,9 M (was Y),10 . unchanged,11 Y unchanged,12 . unchanged. So M at indices 3,9 (i.e., every 6 starting at 3). So bottom row gets M at positions where Y and also align with some periodicity. Observation: Center row gets M at every 3rd cell (period 3). Top row gets M at every 6th cell (period 6) starting at 0. Bottom row gets M at every 6th cell starting at 3 (offset). So rule: The "magenta dahlias replace golden marigolds at periodic intervals. The center row is replanted most frequently; border rows receive dahlias at half the rate, only where flowers coincide with the longer cycle." Thus: Determine base period = length of center row's replacement interval = maybe 3 (since center row full Y). Then border rows get half the frequency (i.e., double period = 6) and only where there is Y (golden) and also aligns with the longer cycle (i.e., positions that are offset such that they line up with the center's M positions? Let's see: center M positions at indices 0,3,6,9,12. Border top gets M at indices 0,6,12 (every other center M). Bottom gets M at indices 3,9 (the other set). So border rows get M at every other center M, alternating between top and bottom. Thus rule: For each column index i, if center row cell is Y, then we consider a repeating pattern of M every 3 cells (starting at 0). Then for top row, we place M at those center M positions where (i mod 6 == 0). For bottom row, M at those where (i mod 6 == 3). Equivalent to top gets ... [6653 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 4-row by 9-column grid. A vertical column of grey (X) cells at column index 4 divides the grid into two 4×4 sub-grids: a left grid and a right grid. The left grid contains a pattern of blue (B) cells and black (.) cells. The right grid contains a pattern of a single non-black color (such as red, magenta, orange, or green) and black (.) cells.
Do: 1. Split the input along the grey (X) column to extract the left 4×4 grid and the right 4×4 grid. 2. Identify all positions that are black (.) in the left grid — these are the 'empty slots.' 3. Identify all positions occupied by the colored (non-black) cells in the right grid. 4. Compare the two sets of positions. If they are exactly equal (same positions, same count), replace every black cell in the left grid with the color from the right grid and output the result. 5. If the positions do NOT exactly match, output the left grid unchanged.
Grid: The input grid is always 4 rows by 9 columns. Column 4 is always grey (X) and serves as a separator. The output grid is always 4×4. The left sub-grid uses only blue (B) and black (.), and the right sub-grid uses only one non-black, non-blue color and black (.). The output grid uses at most two colors: blue and either black or the color from the right grid.
"A lock only turns when the right key fits perfectly into its grooves."
120b: k=1
See: A grey wall divides two rooms. On the left, a blue vault door has gaps cut into it — empty keyholes waiting. On the right, a colored key floats in darkness, its teeth shaped from a single vivid color.
Do: Slide the key into the lock. If every tooth fits perfectly into every keyhole — no extra teeth, no empty holes left over — the key merges with the vault door, filling each gap with its color. If the key doesn't match the lock, the vault stays sealed and unchanged, its empty keyholes still dark.
Grid: The grey wall always stands in the center, separating lock from key. The vault door is always built from blue steel and dark gaps. The key is always carved from a single color. What emerges is either a door transformed — blue and the key's color fused together — or the same cold, unturned lock.
We need to infer rule. From description: grey wall (X) separates left side (vault door) and right side (key). Vault door built from blue (B) with gaps (.)? In example input: grid 4x9? Actually example1 input shows 4 rows, 9 columns. Left side columns before X are vault door region: columns 0-3 are B pattern forming a rectangle with interior maybe? Let's view:
Row0: B B B B X . . . .
Row1: B . . B X . M M .
Row2: B . . B X . M M .
Row3: B B B B X . . . .
So left of X (col0-3) is a blue border rectangle with interior '.' (black) holes. Right of X (col5-8) is key region: colors M (magenta) forming a 2x2 block at rows1-2 cols6-7? Actually columns after X: col5 is '.' (black), col6 M, col7 M, col8 '.'.
Key is a single color (magenta) shape maybe rectangular? The key shape is contiguous region of same color on right side.
The rule: If key shape exactly fits the pattern of holes ('.') in the blue door (i.e., same shape), then fill those holes with key color, merging. Output shows only the left side region (door) with holes filled with M. Output grid is 4x4 (only left side). Indeed output is:
B B B B
B M M B
B M M B
B B B B
So they removed the wall and key region, output only the door region after merging. The key shape matched the holes shape (a 2x2 interior). So they filled interior with M.
If key does not match, output would be unchanged door? Let's infer from test input.
Test Input:
Row0: B B B B X R . . .
Row1: . B B . X R R R R
Row2: . B B . X R . . .
Row3: . . . . X . . . .
Let's parse dimensions: 4 rows, 9 columns.
Left side (cols0-3) door region: columns before X (col4). Let's extract:
Row0 cols0-3: B B B B
Row1: . B B .
Row2: . B B .
Row3: . . . .
So door shape: border maybe? Not full rectangle. Let's view pattern: It seems a 2x2 blue block at rows1-2 cols1-2, with top row full B's, bottom row empty. Actually row0 all B's across 4 columns. Row1 has B at col1,2. Row2 same. Row3 all '.'.
So the door region is not a solid rectangle; maybe the shape of door is defined by B cells (blue). The gaps are '.' cells within the bounding rectangle? In example, door region was a solid rectangle of B border with interior '.' holes. Here door region maybe shape of B cells forms something like a "U" shape? Let's map coordinates (r,c):
B cells:
(0,0)(0,1)(0,2)(0,3)
(1,1)(1,2)
(2,1)(2,2)
That's like a top row full, then a 2x2 block below offset one column in.
The gaps ('.') within the convex hull? Not sure.
Key region: columns after X (col5-8). Let's extract:
Row0 col5-8: R . . .
Row1: R R R R
Row2: R . . .
Row3: . . . .
Key color is R (red). Shape: positions of R:
Row0: (0,5)
Row1: (1,5)(1,6)(1,7)(1,8)
Row2: (2,5)
So shape is like a T? Actually coordinates relative to key region (col5 is first after X). Let's shift to key local coordinates (col5->0). Then shape cells: (0,0), (1,0)(1,1)(1,2)(1,3), (2,0). That's like an upside-down L? Not matching door holes.
We need to determine if key shape matches the door's gaps. What are the gaps? In
... [1986 chars truncated]
"A cell membrane only absorbs molecules whose shape perfectly matches its receptor sites. Mismatched molecules bounce off harmlessly."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue tissue sample with empty receptor cavities sits beside a colored molecular cluster, separated by a grey membrane wall.
Do: If every colored molecule aligns precisely with every cavity in the tissue, the molecules bind and fill the receptors. If even one molecule has no matching cavity or one cavity has no molecule, the tissue rejects the cluster entirely.
Grid: The left 4x4 region is the tissue; black cells are receptor cavities. The right 4x4 region holds the molecular cluster. The grey column is the membrane. Output is the 4x4 tissue, either filled or unchanged.
"An eclipse is total only when the shadow perfectly covers every exposed surface — partial alignment and the sky remains unchanged."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue celestial body with exposed bright patches sits beside a colored shadow pattern, divided by a grey orbital plane.
Do: If the shadow fills every exposed patch exactly, the color of the shadow replaces the brightness. If alignment is off, the celestial body appears as it was before the transit.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the body. Right 4x4 is the shadow. Grey column is the orbital divider. Output is 4x4.
"Cargo loads into a hull only when every crate fits a hold and every hold gets a crate — mismatched manifest and the ship sails empty."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue ship hull with open cargo holds sits beside colored crates on a grey dock.
Do: If every crate maps to an open hold and every hold has a crate, the cargo is loaded and colors fill the hull. Otherwise the ship departs with empty holds.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the hull. Right 4x4 is the dock cargo. Grey column is the gangway. Output is the 4x4 hull.
"A circuit board powers on only when every socket receives a component and no component is left unplaced — an incomplete board stays dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue circuit board with empty sockets sits beside colored components on a grey anti-static mat.
Do: If every component aligns with a socket and every socket gets a component, the board powers up and the components appear in place. Mismatch means the board stays in its original unpowered state.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the board. Right 4x4 is the component tray. Grey column is the divider. Output is 4x4.
"A cursed mask lifts its enchantment only when every rune carved into it is matched by a counter-sigil — incomplete rites leave the curse intact."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue enchanted mask with carved rune-slots faces a set of colored counter-sigils across a grey altar stone.
Do: If every counter-sigil corresponds to a rune-slot and every slot is matched, the sigils fill the mask and transform it. Imperfect alignment leaves the mask cursed and unchanged.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the mask. Right 4x4 is the sigil array. Grey column is the altar. Output is 4x4.
"A partner dance is complete only when every open hand finds a matching grip — unmatched dancers stand still in their original positions."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue dance formation with open positions faces colored dancers waiting across a grey stage divide.
Do: If every dancer finds an open position and every position has a dancer, partners join and color fills the formation. If not, the original formation holds.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the formation. Right 4x4 is the waiting dancers. Grey column is the divide. Output is 4x4.
"Magma fills a cavern system only when every chamber has a lava channel feeding it and every channel reaches a chamber — partial eruptions leave the rock cold."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue rock formation with hollow chambers sits beside a colored magma flow pattern, divided by a grey fault line.
Do: If every magma channel maps to a chamber and every chamber has a channel, the lava fills the voids with color. Incomplete alignment means the rock stays cool and unchanged.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the rock. Right 4x4 is the magma map. Grey column is the fault line. Output is 4x4.
"A pastry chef fills a mold only when the batter volume is the exact shape of the hollow — too much or too little and the mold stays empty."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue pastry mold with hollow spaces sits on one side of a grey countertop divider, and a colored batter shape sits on the other.
Do: If the batter's shape is a perfect negative of the mold's hollows, pour it in and the color fills the gaps. If the shapes don't match perfectly, the mold remains unfilled.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the mold (blue = walls, black = hollows). Right 4x4 is the batter (color = batter, black = air). Grey column divides them. Output is 4x4.
"A melody only harmonizes with a silence pattern when every note lands exactly in a rest — otherwise the orchestra plays the original score unaltered."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue musical score with silent rests is separated by a grey bar line from a colored sequence of notes.
Do: If every colored note corresponds to a rest in the score and every rest has a note, the notes fill the silences. If the correspondence is imperfect, the original score plays as written.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the score (blue = sustained tones, black = rests). Right 4x4 is the note pattern. Grey column separates them. Output is the 4x4 score.
"A defensive formation only breaks when attackers fill every single gap simultaneously — if even one gap is uncovered, the defense holds firm."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue defensive wall with openings faces a colored attacking squad across a grey midfield line.
Do: If attackers perfectly occupy every gap in the wall, they break through and appear in those positions. If any gap is left unfilled or any attacker has no gap, the wall stands unchanged.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the defensive wall. Right 4x4 is the attacking formation. Grey column is the midfield. Output is the 4x4 wall, breached or intact.
"Rain saturates parched earth only when every raindrop finds dry ground — if rain falls on stone or dry patches stay unwatered, the drought persists."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue landscape with patches of dry earth sits beside a colored rain pattern, divided by a grey cloud bank.
Do: If the rain pattern is the exact complement of the dry patches, the rain soaks in and colors the earth. Otherwise the land remains unchanged, as if the storm passed over.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the terrain. Right 4x4 is the rainfall pattern. Grey column is the cloud bank. Output is 4x4 terrain.
"Stained glass is installed only when every pane matches every empty window frame precisely — a single mismatch and the frames stay open."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue cathedral wall with empty window frames stands beside colored glass panes, separated by a grey stone pillar.
Do: If each glass pane aligns with an empty frame and no frame is left without glass, the panes are installed. If the fit is imperfect, the wall remains as it was.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the wall (blue = stone, black = frames). Right 4x4 is the glass layout. Grey column is the pillar. Output is 4x4.
"A siege engine breaches a fortress only when every battering ram targets a weak point — scattered or misaligned strikes leave the walls untouched."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue fortress with structural weak points faces a colored siege formation across a grey no-man's-land.
Do: If every siege weapon aligns with a weak point and every weak point faces a weapon, the walls fall and the color fills the breaches. Misalignment means the fortress stands.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the fortress. Right 4x4 is the siege. Grey column is the buffer zone. Output is the 4x4 fortress.
"Understudies take the stage only when there is exactly one understudy for every absent lead — otherwise the curtain stays down and the original cast performs."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue stage arrangement with empty marks sits beside colored understudies waiting in the wings, separated by a grey curtain.
Do: If every empty mark has a corresponding understudy and every understudy has an empty mark, the understudies take their positions. Otherwise the original arrangement holds.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the stage. Right 4x4 is the wing. Grey column is the curtain. Output is 4x4.
"Seeds take root only when every seed finds a plot of tilled soil and no soil is left unseeded — partial planting yields nothing."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blue garden bed with patches of tilled soil sits beside colored seeds on a grey potting bench.
Do: If every seed aligns with tilled soil and every plot receives a seed, the garden blooms in color. If the match is imperfect, the bed stays as it was.
Grid: Left 4x4 is the garden bed. Right 4x4 is the seed tray. Grey column is the bench. Output is 4x4.
See: The input is a 5-row by 7-column grid with a single non-black color. Colored cells appear only in the two leftmost columns (0 and 1) and the two rightmost columns (5 and 6). The middle three columns (2, 3, 4) are always black. The grid has a vertical axis of symmetry in its structure: the left pair of columns (0–1) and the right pair (5–6) encode two overlapping copies of a 3-column pattern, sharing their inner columns (1 and 5). Row 2 (the middle row) is always entirely black, creating a similar horizontal split: rows 0, 1 and rows 3, 4 encode two overlapping copies of a 3-row pattern sharing their inner rows (1–3).
Do: Produce a 3×3 output grid by combining the left and right column pairs and compressing the five rows into three, using an OR-merge (a cell is colored if either of its source cells is colored, otherwise black): 1. Output column 0 comes from input column 0. 2. Output column 1 is the OR-merge of input column 1 and input column 5 (colored if either is colored). 3. Output column 2 comes from input column 6. For rows: 1. Output row 0 comes from input row 0. 2. Output row 1 is the OR-merge of input rows 1, 2, and 3 (colored if any of those rows has a colored cell in that column). 3. Output row 2 comes from input row 4. Apply both column and row mappings simultaneously to determine each of the 9 output cells.
Grid: The input grid is always 5 rows by 7 columns. The background is black (.). Exactly one non-black color is used per puzzle. Columns 2, 3, and 4 are always entirely black, serving as a separator between the left column pair (0–1) and the right column pair (5–6). The output grid is always 3 rows by 3 columns, using the same single color on a black background.
"Two distant shores reflected in a shrinking lake, merging as the water drains away."
120b: k=1
See: A wide landscape stretches across seven columns, but the heart of it—three columns in the center—is nothing but still, dark water. Life clings only to the narrow shores on the far left and far right, two columns wide on each side. A similar emptiness runs through the middle row, a quiet channel dividing north from south. The colored marks are like campfires lit on these shores, mirrored signals calling to each other across the void.
Do: The dark water evaporates and the land folds inward like a closing book. The left shore and the right shore slide together until they overlap, their inner edges merging into a single shared column. Where either shore had a campfire burning, the merged land keeps the flame—darkness only wins where both sides were dark. The same folding happens vertically: the northern and southern banks collapse toward the center channel, and wherever any of those middle rows carried a signal, the fire persists in the compressed land.
Grid: The wide world is five rows by seven columns, with a single color of campfire against the black night. The three central columns are always empty water. After the fold, only a small three-by-three island remains—the essence of both shores unified, fires combined, darkness only where silence reigned on every side.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: grid 5 rows x 7 columns. Central three columns are empty (black). The leftmost two columns and rightmost two columns may have colored cells (single color per grid? In examples, only one color appears). The transformation: fold horizontally (left onto right) merging inner edges (column 3? Actually central three columns are empty, so after folding left two columns onto right two columns, they overlap into a single column? Let's parse. We have 7 columns: indices 0-6. Central three columns are columns 2,3,4 (0-index). Those are always empty (black). Left shore: columns 0,1. Right shore: columns 5,6. Folding: left shore slides right, right shore slides left, overlapping. The inner edges (columns 1 and 5) merge into a single shared column (maybe column 2 after folding). The outer edges (columns 0 and 6) become outer columns of final 3x3 grid. Similarly vertical folding: rows 0-4 (5 rows). Middle row is row 2 (0-index). That's empty (black). Top shore rows 0,1. Bottom shore rows 3,4. Fold vertically: top rows slide down, bottom rows slide up, merging inner edges (rows 1 and 3) into a single row (row 1 after folding). Outer edges rows 0 and 4 become outer rows of final 3x3. Thus final grid is 3x3: rows correspond to top outer, middle merged, bottom outer; columns correspond to left outer, middle merged, right outer. Now rule for colors: "Where either shore had a campfire burning, the merged land keeps the flame—darkness only wins where both sides were dark." Means after folding, for each overlapping cell (i.e., where left and right overlapped, or top and bottom overlapped), we take OR of colors: if either side has a colored cell (non-black), that color appears. But what if both sides have colors, possibly different? In examples, only one color appears overall, so not needed. But we need to decide tie-breaking: maybe if both have colors, they are same? Could be that they are same color always. We'll assume they are same or we can pick any? Might be that they never conflict. Also for non-overlapping cells (outer edges), they just stay as they were (since only one side). So final 3x3 grid is composed of: - Top row: from original row 0 (leftmost column 0) becomes top-left, row0 col0; top-middle from overlapping of row0 col1 (left inner) and row0 col5 (right inner?) Wait need mapping. Let's map coordinates. Original grid indices: rows 0-4, cols 0-6. After folding horizontally: columns mapping to final 3 columns: - Final column 0 (left outer) corresponds to original column 0 (leftmost) after folding (since right side outer column 6 also maps to final column 2 maybe). Actually final grid width 3: left outer, middle merged, right outer. Left outer final column = original column 0 (leftmost). Right outer final column = original column 6 (rightmost). Middle final column = result of merging original column 1 (left inner) and column 5 (right inner). Since central columns 2,3,4 are empty and disappe ... [3239 chars truncated]
"Two chromosomes carrying partial genetic codes align during meiosis, their genes overlapping to express a complete organism in miniature."
120b: fail
See: A rectangular membrane holds two clusters of living cells at its far edges, separated by a barren gap of empty cytoplasm. The middle corridor is devoid of life.
Do: The cell divides inward — the two distant gene clusters fold toward each other like chromosomes pairing up, and wherever either carries an active gene, the trait expresses in the compressed offspring.
Grid: The parent cell is wide and sparse. The daughter cell is small and dense, carrying the union of both parents' active sites.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. We have input grids larger (5 rows x 7 columns maybe). Output grids smaller (3x3). Seems we take two clusters at far edges (top and bottom rows?) and compress inward. Observation: Input dimensions: Example1 input 5 rows, 7 columns. Output 3 rows, 3 columns. Positions of colored cells: In example1, Y at (row1,col1) and (row1,col7). Also Y at (row5,col1) and (row5,col5) and (row5,col6) and (row5,col7). Output: 3x3 with Y at (1,1), (1,3), (3,1),(3,2),(3,3). Let's map. Maybe rule: take leftmost and rightmost columns of input, overlay them onto a 3x3 grid? Let's examine. Input1 leftmost column: rows1-5: Y, ., ., ., Y. Rightmost column: rows1-5: Y, ., ., ., Y. Also there are Y's in row5 col5,6,7 (near right side). Hmm. Output grid seems to be combination of top and bottom rows? Let's list top row of input1: Y . . . . . Y. Bottom row: Y . . . . Y Y. Output rows: row1: Y . Y (matches top row leftmost Y, middle ., rightmost Y). Row2: . . . (maybe middle row of something). Row3: Y Y Y (matches bottom row leftmost Y, col6 Y, col7 Y?) Actually bottom row had Y . . . . Y Y (positions 1,6,7). Output row3 has Y Y Y (positions 1,2,3). So not direct. Maybe rule: take the two clusters at far edges (top and bottom) and fold them onto each other, overlapping cells where both have color produce that color, else if only one has color produce that color? The output size equals the width of the cluster region? Let's think. In example1, top cluster: row1 has Y at col1 and col7. Bottom cluster: row5 has Y at col1, col5, col6, col7. When folding inward, the top row folds downwards, bottom row folds upwards, meeting in middle (row3). The resulting 3 rows correspond to top row, middle row (merged), bottom row? Output rows: row1 corresponds to top row after folding? It shows Y . Y (same as top). Row3 corresponds to bottom after folding? It shows Y Y Y, which is not same as bottom (Y . . . . Y Y). So maybe after folding, the bottom row is shifted leftwards? Let's examine other examples. Example2 input 5x7. Colors R. Input rows: 1: R R . . . R R 2: . . . . . . R 3: . . . . . . . 4: . R . . . R . 5: R . . . . . R Output 3x3: R R R . R R R . R Let's see top row of input: R R . . . R R -> output row1: R R R (three Rs). So maybe we take leftmost three columns after folding? Not. Bottom row input: R . . . . . R -> output row3: R . R (matches leftmost and rightmost). So output row3 matches bottom row but only three columns (col1, col4?, col7?). Actually bottom row had R at col1 and col7. Output row3 has R at col1 and col3. So rightmost maps to col3. Middle row output row2: . R R. Which corresponds to something like merging rows2 and4? Row2 input has R at col7 only. Row4 input has R at col2 and col6. After folding, maybe col7 maps to col3, col2 maps to col2, col6 maps to col3? That would give . R R (col2 from row4, col3 from row2 or row4 col6). Indeed row4 col2 -> output col2, row4 col6 -> output col3, row2 col7 -> a ... [10737 chars truncated]
"Two galaxies on a collision course — their scattered stars merge into a single compact cluster, and every position that held a star in either galaxy shines in the result."
120b: k=3
See: A wide field of view shows stars gathered only at the far-left and far-right edges, with dark void between them.
Do: Gravity pulls the two galaxies together into one. Every stellar position from either galaxy persists in the merged cluster.
Grid: The wide dark expanse collapses into a small, bright cluster combining all stars from both galaxies.
We need to infer rule. The description: stars at far-left and far-right edges, dark void between. Gravity pulls two galaxies together into one. Every stellar position from either galaxy persists in the merged cluster. The wide dark expanse collapses into a small bright cluster combining all stars from both galaxies. Interpretation: Input grid has colored cells (non-.) at leftmost column(s) and rightmost column(s). Output grid is a smaller grid that contains all those colored cells but compressed towards center? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid size? Let's count rows: 5 rows, columns: 7? Input lines: "Y . . . . . Y" => 7 columns. Row2: ". . . . . . ." (7) Row3: same Row4: same Row5: "Y . . . . Y Y" (7) So left edge column0 has Y at rows1 and5. Right edge column6 has Y at rows1,5,5? Actually row5 has Y Y at columns5 and6? Wait row5: "Y . . . . Y Y": positions: col0 Y, col5 Y, col6 Y. So right edge column6 has Y at rows1 and5. Also there is Y at column5 row5 (near right edge). Output grid: 3 rows, 3 columns: Row1: "Y . Y" Row2: ". . ." Row3: "Y Y Y" So output seems to be a compacted version where the leftmost and rightmost columns are brought together, maybe overlapping? Let's map positions. Input Y positions: (0,0), (0,6), (4,0), (4,5), (4,6). (using row, col) Output Y positions (in 3x3): (0,0), (0,2), (2,0), (2,1), (2,2). That's 5 Y's same count. So transformation: take the minimal bounding rectangle that contains all non-blank cells? Input bounding rectangle: rows 0-4, cols 0-6 => size 5x7. Output size 3x3. Not just bounding box. Maybe they collapse empty columns between left and right groups: The left group (col0) and right group (col5-6) are merged, removing empty columns between them, and also maybe rows with only empties are removed? Let's see rows: Input rows 0-4 all have some Y except rows1-3 are empty. Output rows 0-2 have Y rows at top and bottom, middle row empty. So they removed empty rows (rows1-3) compressing to top and bottom? Actually they kept relative order: topmost non-empty row becomes top row, bottommost becomes bottom row, middle maybe empty row? Wait there were three empty rows between top and bottom Y rows. They collapsed them into a single empty row? In output there is exactly one empty row (row1). So they compressed vertical distance to minimal needed to keep relative ordering? Possibly they map the positions onto a smaller grid where the distance between left and right groups is reduced to 2 columns (i.e., left column index 0, right column index 2). So they keep relative order of columns: leftmost group becomes column0, rightmost group becomes column2, and any columns between become column1 (maybe empty). Similarly rows: topmost group row0, bottommost row2, middle row1 empty. Thus rule: take the set of occupied cells, compute their row indices and column indices. Then map them to a new grid where rows are re-indexed based on their order among distinct occupied rows (preserving order) but compressing ... [7638 chars truncated]
"Two flotillas converge from port and starboard toward a rendezvous point — the harbormaster's log marks every berth occupied by either fleet in the final anchorage."
120b: fail
See: A wide harbor chart shows vessels moored only at the far-left and far-right piers, with open water filling the channel between.
Do: The fleets sail inward and anchor together. Every berth claimed by either flotilla is filled in the combined mooring plan.
Grid: The wide harbor compresses to a small anchorage showing every occupied slip from both fleets.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5 rows? Example1 input: "Y . . . . . Y" row1 length 7. Row2 all dots length 6? Actually row2: ". . . . . . ." length7. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: "Y . . . . Y Y" length7. So 5x7 grid. Output: "Y . Y" row1 length3. Row2 ". . ." length3. Row3 "Y Y Y" length3. So output is 3x3. Interpretation: "wide harbor compresses to a small anchorage showing every occupied slip from both fleets." So we have leftmost and rightmost columns have Y's (vessels). They compress inward: combine left and right sides into center? Output shows Y's where any Y existed in either leftmost or rightmost column? Let's examine. Input leftmost column (col1): rows: Y, ., ., ., Y. Rightmost column (col7): Y, ., ., ., Y. So both columns have Y at rows1 and5. Output 3x3 grid: maybe rows correspond to original rows that had any Y in either side? Output rows: row1 Y . Y (Y at left and right). Row2 . . . (no Y). Row3 Y Y Y (all three Y). Hmm. Let's map: maybe we take the union of left and right columns and compress them to three columns: leftmost, center, rightmost? The center column maybe indicates rows where both sides have Y? In output row3 (original row5) has Y Y Y (both sides Y, plus center Y). Row1 (original row1) has Y . Y (both sides Y, center empty). Row2 (original row2-4?) Actually row2 output corresponds to original row2? Row2 input had no Y on sides, output all dots. But why row3 has center Y? Because maybe there is Y also in middle column of input? Let's check input row5: "Y . . . . Y Y". There is Y at col1, col6, col7. So there are three Y's on right side (col6 and col7). After compression, maybe we shift all Y's towards center, merging overlapping? Let's think: The "fleets sail inward and anchor together. Every berth claimed by either flotilla is filled in the combined mooring plan." So we take left fleet (leftmost column) and right fleet (rightmost column) and move them inward until they meet, overlaying. So we compress the width: basically we take the leftmost non-empty column and rightmost non-empty column and bring them together, maybe overlapping if they meet. In example, leftmost column has Y at rows1,5. Rightmost column has Y at rows1,5. When compressing, they become adjacent columns? Output width 3: maybe left column = original leftmost, middle column = original rightmost after moving leftwards by some amount? But why three columns not two? Perhaps there is also a middle column representing original middle column (col4?) but not. Let's compute distances: Input width 7. If we compress to minimal width that contains all Y's after moving them inward symmetrically? Suppose we shift left fleet rightwards and right fleet leftwards until they meet or overlap. The left fleet Y's at rows1,5 start at col1. Right fleet Y's at rows1,5 start at col7. They move towards center. The distance between them is 6 columns apart (col1 to col7). They could meet after moving 3 steps each, ending at col4 (center). So final positions wou ... [6036 chars truncated]
"Two partial circuit boards are sandwiched together — wherever either board has a trace, current flows through the combined layer."
120b: k=4
See: A wide PCB layout shows conductive traces only along the far-left and far-right rail zones, with bare substrate spanning the middle.
Do: Laminate the two edge zones together into one compact board. Apply an OR gate: any position with a trace on either layer becomes conductive in the merged circuit.
Grid: The wide board shrinks to a compact chip where every trace from either original rail is active.
We need to infer rule. From description: "wide PCB layout shows conductive traces only along the far-left and far-right rail zones, with bare substrate spanning the middle. What to do: Laminate the two edge zones together into one compact board. Apply an OR gate: any position with a trace on either layer becomes conductive in the merged circuit. Grid details: The wide board shrinks to a compact chip where every trace from either original rail is active." Interpretation: Input grid is wide (maybe 5 rows, many columns). Edge zones are leftmost columns and rightmost columns? The output is narrower (maybe 3 columns). It seems they take leftmost and rightmost columns (maybe two columns each?) and combine them into a single column? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid: 5 rows, 7 columns? Let's count: "Y . . . . . Y" that's 7 columns. Row2: ". . . . . . ." 7 columns. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: "Y . . . . Y Y" 7 columns. Output: 3 columns, 3 rows? Actually output shows 3 rows, 3 columns: "Y . Y", ". . .", "Y Y Y". So output size is 3x3. Input size 5x7. So transformation reduces rows and columns. Maybe they take leftmost 2 columns and rightmost 2 columns? Let's map. Input rows 5, output rows 3. So maybe they compress vertical dimension by taking top, middle, bottom? Actually maybe they take leftmost and rightmost "rail zones" which are columns 1 and 7? But output has 3 columns, not 2. Maybe they overlay left and right zones onto a 3-column board: left zone becomes column1, middle zone becomes column2 (maybe from something?), right zone becomes column3? But description says "Laminate the two edge zones together into one compact board." So maybe they overlay left and right zones onto each other, merging them (OR). That would produce a board of width equal to the width of one zone (maybe half?). But output width is 3, while each zone maybe 3 columns? Let's examine. In input1, left zone maybe columns 1-3? Right zone columns 5-7? Middle column 4 is blank. If we overlay left and right zones (OR) we get a board of width 3 (since each zone width 3). That matches output width 3. So they take leftmost 3 columns and rightmost 3 columns, overlay them column-wise (i.e., column1 of left with column7 of right? Actually need mapping). Let's test. Input1 left 3 columns (col1-3): Row1: Y . . Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: . . . Row5: Y . . Right 3 columns (col5-7): Row1: . . Y (col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 Y) Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: . . . Row5: . Y Y (col5 '.' col6 Y col7 Y) Now overlay with OR: combine each corresponding position (row same, column index within zone). So result 5 rows x3 columns where each cell is Y if either left or right has Y. Compute: Row1: left (Y . .) OR right (. . Y) => Y . Y Row2: . . . OR . . . => . . . Row3: . . . OR . . . => . . . Row4: . . . OR . . . => . . . Row5: left (Y . .) OR right (. Y Y) => Y Y Y? Wait left row5 col1 Y, col2 ., col3 . ; right row5 col1 '.' (col5), col2 Y (col6), col3 Y (col7). So combine: ... [10125 chars truncated]
"Two shattered halves of a divine tablet are brought together by a questing hero — wherever either shard bears a rune, the restored tablet glows with power."
120b: fail
See: A wide stone slab has ancient runes inscribed only near its left and right broken edges, with smooth blank stone between the fractures.
Do: Press the two halves together, closing the gap. Every rune surviving on either fragment appears on the restored whole.
Grid: The wide broken tablet becomes a compact sacred stone bearing every rune from both shards.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are 5 rows? Example1 input: 5 rows, 7 columns. Output: 3 rows, 3 columns. So transformation compresses left and right edges together, discarding middle blank area. Essentially take leftmost non-blank column(s) and rightmost non-blank column(s) and overlay? Let's examine. Example1 input grid (5x7): Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y Interpretation: runes (Y) at left edge column1 rows1 and5, and right edge columns6? Actually column7 has Y at row1, column6? Row5 has Y at column6 and column7. So left fragment: column1 maybe? Right fragment: columns6-7? The description: runes near left and right broken edges, blank middle. Press halves together, closing gap, every rune surviving appears on restored whole. So we need to overlay left side and right side onto each other, aligning edges? Probably we take leftmost column(s) and rightmost column(s) and bring them together side by side, maybe overlapping at the seam? Output 3x3 grid: rows? Let's map. Left fragment: columns 1? maybe more if there are runes near left edge. Right fragment: columns 6-7? Let's extract left fragment (non-blank columns on left side). In example1, left side has Y at (1,1) and (5,1). Right side has Y at (1,7), (5,6), (5,7). When we bring halves together, we might align the inner edges (the broken edges) together, meaning column1 aligns with column7? Or column1 aligns with column6? Let's test. If we take left fragment (col1) and right fragment (col6-7) and bring them together, we might produce a 3x3 output: maybe rows correspond to original rows? Output rows 3, columns 3. So maybe we compress vertical dimension also? Let's examine output: Output: Row1: Y . Y Row2: . . . Row3: Y Y Y Positions: (1,1)=Y, (1,3)=Y, (3,1)=Y, (3,2)=Y, (3,3)=Y. These correspond to original Y positions? Original Y at (1,1) maps to output (1,1). Original Y at (1,7) maps to output (1,3). Original Y at (5,1) maps to output (3,1). Original Y at (5,6) maps to output (3,2). Original Y at (5,7) maps to output (3,3). So mapping seems to preserve relative positions: leftmost column becomes leftmost column in output, rightmost column becomes rightmost column, but also middle column (col6) becomes middle column? Wait output width 3 corresponds to three columns: left edge, middle (maybe inner edge), right edge. In original, left edge column1, right edge columns6 and7. That's three columns total (col1, col6, col7). So output width equals number of distinct columns that contain any non-blank cells (runes). Similarly rows: original rows with any runes are rows1 and5 (maybe also row? row5). That's two rows, but output has 3 rows. Actually output rows correspond to rows1,5? plus maybe row? Let's list original rows with runes: row1 has Y at col1 and col7. row5 has Y at col1,6,7. That's rows1 and5 only. Output rows: row1 corresponds to original row1, row3 corresponds to original row5, row2 is blank (no runes). So they kept ... [12275 chars truncated]
"Two lines of dancers advance from opposite wings and interleave at center stage — every position that either line touched is marked in the choreographer's notation."
120b: k=2
See: A wide dance floor shows performers only in the far-left and far-right wings, with empty space across the middle.
Do: The two lines converge and merge. The final notation marks every floor position that either line of dancers occupied.
Grid: The wide floor plan compresses into a compact notation square showing every step from both lines.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are rectangular (maybe 5 rows x 7 columns?). Example1 input: 5 rows, 7 columns. Output: 3x3. Example2 input also 5x7, output 3x3. So transformation compresses left and right wings into a smaller square representing union of positions occupied by lines? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid (I'll index rows 1-5, cols1-7). Represent Y as Y, . as empty. Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y So there are Y's at (1,1), (1,7), (5,1), (5,6), (5,7). Two lines? The description: performers only in far-left and far-right wings, empty middle. So left wing column1 has Y at rows1 and5. Right wing columns6-7 have Y at row1 col7, row5 col6 and col7. So maybe two lines: left line vertical? Actually left line maybe from top-left to bottom-left (col1 rows1 and5). Right line maybe from top-right to bottom-right (col7 rows1 and5) plus extra at (5,6). Output 3x3: Row1: Y . Y Row2: . . . Row3: Y Y Y Interpretation: compress columns: leftmost column corresponds to left wing, rightmost column to right wing, middle column maybe merging? Let's map positions: Output rows correspond to original rows? Output rows 1-3 correspond to top, middle, bottom? Input had 5 rows; output 3 rows. So maybe they take the convex hull of Y positions and then project onto a 3x3 grid? Let's compute bounding box of Y's: rows 1 to5, cols1 to7. That's 5x7. But output 3x3 maybe representing pattern of Y's after "converge and merge": The two lines converge to center? The rule might be: take leftmost column of Y's and rightmost column of Y's, then overlay them onto a 3x3 grid where each row corresponds to top, middle, bottom of original (maybe compress by factor?). Let's examine mapping. Original Y positions: (1,1) top-left (1,7) top-right (5,1) bottom-left (5,6) bottom-right-ish (5,7) bottom-right Output Y positions: (1,1) top-left (1,3) top-right (3,1) bottom-left (3,2) bottom-middle (3,3) bottom-right So bottom row has three Y's, matching three Y's at bottom of input (col1,6,7). Top row has two Y's at left and right, matching top two Y's. So seems they compress columns: original columns 1..7 map to output columns 1..3. Mapping maybe: leftmost column(s) -> col1, middle columns -> col2, rightmost column(s) -> col3. For bottom row, there were Y's at col1,6,7. So col1 maps to output col1, col6 and col7 both map to output col3? But output also has Y at col2 (bottom middle). That suggests col6 maps to col2? Let's test: bottom row Y at col6 becomes output col2. Y at col7 becomes output col3. So mapping: maybe compress by taking three zones: leftmost column (col1) -> left zone, middle columns (col2-? maybe col3-5) -> middle zone, rightmost columns (col6-7) -> right zone. In bottom row, we have Y at col6 (right zone) but output shows Y at middle column, not rightmost. Hmm. Let's examine Example2. Input Example2 grid 5x7: Row1: R R . . . R R Row2: . . . . . . R Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: ... [11493 chars truncated]
"Two tectonic plates bearing scattered mineral deposits collide and compress — every vein present on either plate surfaces in the new mountain range."
120b: fail
See: A wide cross-section shows ore deposits only along the far-left and far-right plate edges, with empty mantle between them.
Do: The plates converge and crumple together. Every mineral vein from either plate is pushed upward into the compressed range.
Grid: The wide geological section folds into a compact mountain core combining all deposits from both plates.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5 rows? Example1 input: "Y . . . . . Y" that's 7 columns. Then rows: total 5 rows. Output: "Y . Y" (3 cols) then ". . ." then "Y Y Y". So output size reduced: width 3, height 3. The description: wide cross-section with ore deposits only along far-left and far-right plate edges, empty mantle between them. Plates converge and crumple together. Every mineral vein from either plate is pushed upward into the compressed range. So we take leftmost column and rightmost column of input, combine them into a narrower central region, stacking upward? Let's examine example. Input grid (5x7): Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y Left edge column (col1): row1 Y, row2 ., row3 ., row4 ., row5 Y. Right edge column (col7): row1 Y, row2 ., row3 ., row4 ., row5 Y. But also there is Y at col6 row5? Actually row5: "Y . . . . Y Y": columns: 1 Y, 2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y,7 Y. So rightmost edge col7 Y, also col6 Y adjacent. But description says deposits only along far-left and far-right plate edges. In input we have Y at leftmost column rows1 and5. Rightmost column rows1 and5. Also extra Y at col6 row5 (near right edge). Maybe considered part of right plate? The right plate includes rightmost two columns? Let's think. Output 3x3: Row1: Y . Y Row2: . . . Row3: Y Y Y Interpretation: after folding, we have combined left and right deposits into central columns. How to map? Perhaps we take leftmost non-empty column(s) and rightmost non-empty column(s) and overlay them, moving right side upward (pushed upward) onto left side? The output shows Y at top left (from left top), Y at top right (from right top). Bottom row has Y Y Y: left bottom Y, middle Y (maybe from right bottom col6?), right bottom Y (from right bottom col7). Indeed bottom row of output has three Y's, corresponding to three Y's in input bottom row across columns 1,6,7. So they got compressed into three columns. Thus rule: compress horizontally by removing empty columns (all black) between leftmost and rightmost non-empty columns, shifting everything towards center? Actually we keep relative order left to right but collapse empty columns. In input, columns 2-5 are all '.' (black). So we drop them, resulting in columns: col1, col6, col7? Wait col6 has Y only in row5, else '.'; col6 is not all empty because row5 Y. So we keep columns that contain any colored cell (non-black). So we keep col1 (Y at rows1,5), col6 (Y at row5), col7 (Y at rows1,5). That yields 3 columns, matching output width 3. The rows remain same? Output height is 3 rows, not 5. So also we compress vertically by removing empty rows (all black). Input rows 2-4 are all '.' (empty). So we drop them, leaving rows1 and5 (two rows). But output has 3 rows. Hmm. Maybe we also "push upward" meaning we stack the two plates together, overlapping rows? The description: plates converge and crumple together. Every mineral vein from either plate is pus ... [2855 chars truncated]
"Two halves of a broken cracker, each with scattered toppings, are pressed together into a single bite — whatever was on either half stays on the finished canapé."
120b: fail
See: A long rectangular platter has ingredients placed only near its left and right edges, with a clean empty stretch of plate running down the middle.
Do: Fold the platter in half so the garnished edges meet, then press down. Any topping present on either side remains on the combined appetizer.
Grid: The platter shrinks into a small square plate holding the merged arrangement of all toppings from both ends.
We need to infer rule. Input grid rectangular, with ingredients near left and right edges, empty middle. Output is smaller square merging both sides. Example1: Input size? Let's count rows: 5 rows, columns? "Y . . . . . Y" => 7 columns. So 5x7. Ingredients (Y) appear near left and right edges. Output is 3x3. So they folded horizontally? Actually "long rectangular platter" likely width > height. Fold in half so left and right edges meet, combine toppings (Y). So we take left half and right half, overlay them (mirrored) onto a square of size equal to height? Output 3x3 while input height 5. Hmm not matching. Let's map positions. Input grid coordinates (row, col). Let's write rows: Row0: col0 Y, col1 ., col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 Y Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: all . Row4: Y . . . . Y Y So left edge Y at (0,0) and (4,0). Right edge Y at (0,6), (4,5), (4,6). Output grid 3x3: Row0: Y . Y Row1: . . . Row2: Y Y Y Interpretation: maybe they take leftmost 3 columns and rightmost 3 columns, fold them onto each other (mirrored) resulting in 3 columns (since half width). Height maybe 3 (since only rows that have any toppings?). Actually output height 3, maybe they also fold vertically? Let's see. If we take left side columns 0-2 (3 columns) and right side columns 4-6 (3 columns). Middle column 3 is empty stretch. Then fold: right side reversed horizontally onto left side. So for each row, combine: left cell OR right mirrored cell (if any topping). Let's test. Left side matrix (rows 0-4, cols0-2): Row0: Y . . Row1: . . . Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: Y . . Right side matrix (cols4-6): Row0: . . Y Row1: . . . Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: Y Y Y (since cols4=Y? Wait row4 col4 is '.'? Actually row4: "Y . . . . Y Y": columns:0 Y,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 Y,6 Y. So col4 '.'; col5 Y; col6 Y. So right side cols4-6: . Y Y. Now mirror right side horizontally (flip left-right) to align with left side: mirrored right side becomes (col6->0, col5->1, col4->2). So for each row: Row0 right side original . . Y => reversed Y . . (since col6 Y, col5 ., col4 .). So mirrored row0: Y . . Row1: . . . => . . . Row2: . . . => . . . Row3: . . . => . . . Row4: . Y Y => Y Y . (since col6 Y, col5 Y, col4 .) reversed => Y Y . Now combine with left side using OR (if any Y present). Left side row0: Y . . ; right mirrored row0: Y . . => combine => Y . . (but output row0 col0 Y, col1 ., col2 Y). Wait output row0 is Y . Y. So column2 should be Y from right side? But our right mirrored row0 col2 is . . So not match. Maybe they also fold vertically (top-bottom) after horizontal? Let's examine output size 3x3: maybe they also take top 2 rows and bottom 2 rows? Input height 5, middle row 2 empty. So they fold top and bottom edges together, resulting in 3 rows (top half + bottom half). Let's test similar process: top rows 0-1 (2 rows) and bottom rows 3-4 (2 rows) with middle row 2 empty. Fold vertically: bottom half reversed vertically onto top ... [11468 chars truncated]
"Two musicians playing the same song from opposite ends of a cathedral — their scattered notes echo inward and fuse into one rich chord at the center."
120b: fail
See: A wide score sheet shows notes clustered at the left and right margins, with silent measures filling the space between them.
Do: The two performances collapse toward the middle, and wherever either musician played a note, sound rings in the combined piece.
Grid: The expansive silent score condenses into a compact arrangement where every note from both players is heard.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is rectangular, with colored cells at left and right margins, rest empty (black '.' maybe). Output is a compact arrangement where notes from both sides collapse to middle, and wherever either musician played a note, sound rings in combined piece. So likely we take leftmost non-empty column and rightmost non-empty column, and overlay them? Let's examine example. Example1 Input grid (7 columns? Let's write rows): Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y So notes (Y) at left margin column1 rows1 and5. Right margin column7 rows1,5,5? Actually row5 has Y at col6? Wait row5: "Y . . . . Y Y" that's columns:1 Y,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y,7 Y. So right side has Y at col6 and col7 row5, and col7 row1. Output: Y . Y . . . Y Y Y Output grid size 3x3. Let's see mapping: maybe we take left side notes and right side notes and compress horizontally to middle, overlapping if same row? Let's list left notes positions: (row1,col1), (row5,col1). Right notes positions: (row1,col7), (row5,col6), (row5,col7). After collapse, we maybe take left notes as leftmost column of output, right notes as rightmost column, and combine overlapping rows? Output rows correspond to original rows that had any notes? There are rows 1 and5 have notes; row2-4 empty. Output has 3 rows: maybe they kept rows with notes plus one empty row? Actually output rows: row1: Y . Y (both left and right notes present). row2: . . . (empty). row3: Y Y Y (both left and right notes? left Y at row5, right Y at col6 and col7 maybe produce two Y's? output row3 has three Y's.) Let's map: Output columns 1,2,3 correspond to left margin, middle (maybe empty), right margin collapsed? In row1, left Y present, right Y present => Y . Y. Good. Row3: left Y present (from row5 col1) => Y at col1. Right side had two Y's (col6 and col7) maybe both collapse into two rightmost columns? Output row3 has Y Y Y (three Y's). That suggests left Y plus two right Y's produce three Y's across columns 1-3. So maybe rule: take all notes from each row, keep their relative order left-to-right, but compress columns to remove empty columns, preserving order. So we take each row, extract the sequence of colored cells (ignoring '.'), and output that sequence as a row, left-aligned, with '.' filling rest to match max width across rows. Let's test: Row1 input sequence: Y (col1) then Y (col7) => "Y Y". Output row1: Y . Y (has a dot in middle). Not just "Y Y". So they inserted a dot between? Maybe they keep original spacing between left and right groups? Actually there were many empty columns between left and right notes. They collapsed the whole grid to minimal width that still separates left and right groups? Wait row1 had left note at col1, right at col7, distance 6 columns apart. After collapse, they maybe keep a single column gap between groups, resulting in three columns: left note, gap, right note. Row3 had left note at col1, right notes ... [8808 chars truncated]
"Two relay teams sprint from opposite sidelines toward center court — their footprints overlap on the final scoreboard wherever either team stepped."
120b: fail
See: A wide playing field has players positioned only along the far-left and far-right sideline zones, with the entire center of the field empty.
Do: Collapse the field inward so both sideline formations overlap. The final formation marks every position that either team occupied.
Grid: The wide field compresses to a compact court showing the combined footprint of both squads.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is wide with players only on far-left and far-right columns (sidelines). Center empty. Output is compressed overlapping both sides, marking any position that either side had a player. Essentially we take leftmost column and rightmost column patterns and overlay them onto a smaller grid of width maybe 3? In example: Input 5 rows, 7 columns? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid (rows): Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y So leftmost column (col1) has Y at rows1 and5. Rightmost column (col7) has Y at rows1,5,5? Actually row5 col7 is Y, row5 col6 also Y? Wait row5: "Y . . . . Y Y" meaning columns: 1 Y, 2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y,7 Y. So rightmost column col7 Y at rows1 and5. Also there is Y at col6 row5 (adjacent to right side). But description said only far-left and far-right sideline zones. However there is also Y at col6 (second from right). Maybe the "sideline zones" include the outer two columns? Let's see. Output grid: Y . Y . . . Y Y Y Dimensions: 3 columns, 3 rows. So they collapsed width from 7 to 3. How? Possibly they took leftmost 2 columns and rightmost 2 columns and overlapped? Let's map. Input rows 5, output rows 3. So also collapsed height? Actually they collapsed vertical? The description says collapse field inward so both sideline formations overlap. That suggests we take left side and right side and bring them together, overlapping rows as well? The output rows correspond to rows that had any players? Input had players only in rows 1 and 5 (and maybe row5 also). Output rows are 3 rows: maybe they keep top, middle, bottom? Let's analyze mapping. Let's label input coordinates (r,c). Left side players: at (1,1) Y, (5,1) Y. Right side players: at (1,7) Y, (5,6) Y, (5,7) Y. Output grid 3x3 rows 1-3, cols1-3. Output shows Y at (1,1), (1,3), (3,1), (3,2), (3,3). So pattern: top row Y . Y, middle row . . ., bottom row Y Y Y. How could this be derived? Perhaps we take left side column (col1) and right side column (col7) and overlay them onto a 3-column grid where left side maps to col1, right side maps to col3, and overlapping middle column (col2) gets any players that were in the second-from-right column (col6) maybe? Indeed there is a Y at (5,6) which maps to middle column bottom row Y. That matches output bottom middle Y. Also left side column (col1) maps to output col1. Right side column (col7) maps to output col3. The middle column (col2) maybe corresponds to column 6? So they compress by taking outer two columns and merging them into three columns: leftmost -> left, rightmost -> right, and the column just inside rightmost (col6) becomes middle? But why not also column2 (just inside leftmost) maybe not present. In example, there were no players in column2, so middle column only gets from column6. Thus rule: take the leftmost non-empty column(s) and rightmost non-empty column(s) and bring them together, preserving relative order from ... [12041 chars truncated]
"Two storm fronts approach from opposite horizons across a calm valley — when they collide, every place that felt rain from either system is marked on the flood map."
120b: fail
See: A wide atmospheric chart shows precipitation cells gathered at the far left and far right edges, separated by a broad band of clear sky.
Do: The two fronts converge into one compact system. Anywhere that either front carried moisture becomes a rain cell in the merged storm.
Grid: The wide radar image shrinks to a small, dense storm cell combining all wet zones from both approaching fronts.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example1 input: 5 rows? Let's count: lines: "Y . . . . . Y" (7 columns) ". . . . . . ." (7) ". . . . . . ." (7) ". . . . . . ." (7) "Y . . . . Y Y" (7) So 5 rows x7 cols. Output: "Y . Y" (3 cols) ". . ." (3) "Y Y Y" (3) So output size 3x3. Interpretation: "wide atmospheric chart shrinks to a small, dense storm cell combining all wet zones from both approaching fronts." So we take leftmost and rightmost columns that have Y (rain) maybe? Input has Y at (row1,col1) and (row1,col7). Also row5 col1, col6, col7. So Y's are at left edge column1 rows1,5; right edge columns6,7 rows5, and column7 row1. So two fronts: left edge Y's and right edge Y's. Merge into compact storm: output includes Y wherever either front had Y, but compressed. How to compress? Possibly take bounding box of Y's from left and right edges and collapse horizontally to center? Output 3x3 maybe corresponds to rows that had Y? Input rows with Y: rows1 and5. That's two rows, but output has 3 rows. Hmm. Let's map: Output grid rows correspond to original rows? maybe we take rows that contain any Y (wet zones) from either front, and also include a middle row (maybe empty) representing space between fronts? In example, rows with Y are 1 and5, distance 4 rows apart. Output has 3 rows: top row corresponds to top front, middle row corresponds to middle empty area, bottom row corresponds to bottom front. So they compress vertical dimension to three: top front row, middle row (maybe all '.'), bottom front row. Similarly horizontally, we compress columns: left front columns (col1) and right front columns (col6,7) into three columns: left front column, middle column (maybe '.'), right front column. Output shows Y at left top (row1 col1) and Y at right top (row1 col3). Also bottom row has Y Y Y across all three columns (since bottom front had Y at col1,6,7). So rule: For each front (left edge and right edge), we take the pattern of Y's across rows (i.e., which rows have Y at that edge) and map to leftmost column of output. Similarly for right edge pattern map to rightmost column. The middle column maybe always '.'? In output middle column top row '.'; middle row all '.'; bottom row Y at middle column also Y (since bottom front had Y at both left and right edges, maybe they both map to left and right columns, but middle column also Y? Actually bottom row output "Y Y Y": left, middle, right all Y. That suggests that when both fronts have Y in same row, they merge to fill all columns? Let's examine: Bottom row (original row5) had Y at col1, col6, col7 (two right edge Y's). So left front Y present, right front Y present (maybe multiple). Output row3 (bottom) has Y at left, middle, right. So middle column gets Y because both fronts present? Or because there were Y's on both sides, they combine to fill middle. Similarly top row (original row1) had Y at col1 and col7 (both sides). Output top row "Y . Y": middle column '.' not Y. So why not Y? Beca ... [6046 chars truncated]
"Two mirror-image blueprints of a ruined façade are overlaid on a lightbox — wherever either blueprint shows a surviving brick, the restoration fills it in."
120b: k=4
See: A wide architectural elevation shows structural elements only in its far-left and far-right bays, with hollow emptiness spanning the central columns.
Do: Stack the two wing plans on top of each other, aligning them. Any bay marked as intact on either plan gets rebuilt in the restored design.
Grid: The wide elevation compresses into a compact façade where every brick present in either wing appears in the final restoration.
We need to infer rule. From description: "wide architectural elevation shows structural elements only in its far-left and far-right bays, with hollow emptiness spanning the central columns. Stack the two wing plans on top of each other, aligning them. Any bay marked as intact on either plan gets rebuilt in the restored design. Grid details: The wide elevation compresses into a compact façade where every brick present in either wing appears in the final restoration." Interpretation: Input grid is wide (maybe 5 rows, 7 columns). The left wing is leftmost columns? Right wing is rightmost columns? The central columns are empty. Output is compressed (maybe only three columns) representing union of left and right wings. Look at examples. Example1 Input 5 rows x7 columns: Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y Output 3 rows x3 columns: Row1: Y . Y Row2: . . . Row3: Y Y Y So output size is 3x3. Input 5x7. How derived? Possibly take leftmost 2 columns? Actually left wing maybe columns 0-2? Right wing columns 4-6? Let's map. Input columns index 0-6. Left wing maybe columns 0-2 (first three). Right wing maybe columns 4-6 (last three). Central column index 3 is empty. Now we "stack the two wing plans on top of each other, aligning them". Means overlay left wing and right wing (maybe one on top of other) to produce a 3x3 output where each cell is union (if either wing has a colored cell, output that color; if both have colors maybe something else). Let's test. Extract left wing (cols0-2): Rows: 0: Y . . 1: . . . 2: . . . 3: . . . 4: Y . . So left wing matrix: [ [Y,.,.], [.,.,.], [.,.,.], [.,.,.], [Y,.,.] ] Right wing (cols4-6): Rows: 0: . . Y 1: . . . 2: . . . 3: . . . 4: Y Y Y (since row5: Y . . . . Y Y -> cols4-6 are Y Y? Wait row5: Y . . . . Y Y: indices:0 Y,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 Y,6 Y. So cols4-6 = . Y Y? Actually col4 is ., col5 Y, col6 Y. So row5 right wing = . Y Y) Let's list rows 0-4: Row0: col4 '.' col5 '.'? Wait row0: Y . . . . . Y: indices:0 Y,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 Y. So cols4-6 = . . Y. Row1: . . . . . . . => . . . Row2: . . . . . . . => . . . Row3: . . . . . . . => . . . Row4: Y . . . . Y Y => . Y Y Now we need to "stack" them aligning. Possibly we overlay rows: left wing rows 0-4 stacked on top of right wing rows 0-4? But output only 3 rows. Maybe we compress vertically as well: combine top and bottom? Let's see output rows: Output row0: Y . Y Row1: . . . Row2: Y Y Y How could that be derived? Perhaps we take union of left and right wing per column, but also compress rows by taking topmost and bottommost rows where there are elements? Let's compute union per cell (if either wing has a colored cell, keep that color; if both have colors maybe choose something). For each position (row, col) within 5x3? Actually both wings have 5 rows. Union would be 5x3 matrix. Let's compute union: Rows 0-4: Row0: left (Y . .) right (. . Y) => union: Y . Y (since ... [8484 chars truncated]
"Two flanking battalions close in from opposite edges of the battlefield — the general's map marks every square that either flank can threaten."
120b: fail
See: A wide battlefield map shows troop positions clustered at the far-left and far-right flanks, with no-man's-land stretching empty between them.
Do: The pincers close: fold the flanks inward until they overlap, and mark every position that falls under either battalion's zone of control.
Grid: The sprawling theater of war shrinks to a tight tactical grid showing the combined threat coverage of both flanks.
We need to infer rule. Input grid example 1: Let's write coordinates. Input 6 rows? Actually given as 5 rows? Let's parse: Example 1 Input: Row1: Y . . . . . Y Row2: . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . Y Y So 5 rows, 7 columns. Output: Row1: Y . Y Row2: . . . Row3: Y Y Y So output is 3 rows, 3 columns. Interpretation: "fold flanks inward until they overlap, and mark every position that falls under either battalion's zone of control." So we have left flank positions (Y) on far left column? In input, Y at (row1,col1) and (row5,col1). Right flank Y at (row1,col7), (row5,col6), (row5,col7). So left flank cluster left side, right flank cluster right side. Folding: maybe we take left half and right half and overlay (mirror) onto center. Overlap positions where either has Y become Y. Specifically, we might take leftmost columns and rightmost columns and bring them together by folding horizontally (mirroring) onto central columns. The output size seems to be width = distance between flanks? Let's compute: Input width 7. After folding, output width 3. That suggests we took leftmost 3 columns (including left flank) and rightmost 3 columns (mirrored) overlapping onto 3 columns. The middle column maybe from both sides overlapping. Let's map: Left side columns 1-3? Right side columns 5-7? Middle column 4 maybe empty. If we fold right side onto left side: column7 maps to column1, column6 to column2, column5 to column3. Then combine with original left side columns 1-3. Then output columns correspond to columns 1-3 after overlay. Now compute overlay: Input left side columns 1-3: col1: Y at rows1 and5. col2: all . col3: all . Right side columns 5-7: col5: all . col6: row5 Y, others . col7: row1 Y, row5 Y. When mirrored: col7 -> col1, col6 -> col2, col5 -> col3. Overlay rule: if either side has Y, output Y. Now compute output grid rows? Need to also fold rows? The output has 3 rows, while input has 5 rows. So also folding vertically? Perhaps we also fold top and bottom flanks inward (since clusters at top and bottom?). In example, Y also at top row (row1) and bottom row (row5). So we fold vertically similarly: top rows onto bottom rows. Thus we take top 2 rows? Let's see: Input height 5, output height 3. So fold top rows onto bottom rows: row1 maps to row5, row2 maps to row4, row3 stays center. Overlay Y where either. Now compute combined overlay both dimensions: So final output cell (i,j) corresponds to overlay of four possible positions: (i,j) from original left/top quadrant, (i, mirrored col) from right side, (mirrored row, j) from bottom side, and (mirrored row, mirrored col) from opposite corner? Actually folding both axes leads to overlapping of up to 4 cells. Simplify: For each cell in output grid of size ceil(n/2) x ceil(m/2) maybe? Input 5x7 => output 3x3 (ceil(5/2)=3, ceil(7/2)=4? Actually ceil(7/2)=4, but output width 3, not 4. So maybe floor? floor(7/2)=3. So output dimensions = floor(rows/ ... [11907 chars truncated]
"Two spotlights aim from opposite wings of the stage — wherever either beam falls, the audience sees an actor illuminated in the final tableau."
120b: k=2
See: A wide stage has performers standing only in the far-left and far-right wings, while the center stage sits dark and empty.
Do: The wings fold inward for the curtain call. Every position lit by either spotlight becomes visible in the compact final scene.
Grid: The expansive stage compresses into a small tableau where every illuminated mark from either wing appears.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1 Input 6x? Actually grid: rows 5? Let's count: Input lines: "Y . . . . . Y" (7 columns) ". . . . . . ." (7) ". . . . . . ." (7) ". . . . . . ." (7) "Y . . . . Y Y" (7) So 5 rows, 7 columns. Output: "Y . Y" (3 columns) ". . ." (3) "Y Y Y" (3) So output is 3x3. Interpretation: "performers only in far-left and far-right wings, center empty". So leftmost column and rightmost column have colored cells (Y). The rest empty. Then compress: "fold inward" meaning bring left and right columns together, overlapping? Output shows positions where either left or right had a colored cell become visible. Let's map: Input left column (col0) rows: Y, ., ., ., Y. Right column (col6) rows: Y, ., ., ., Y Y? Wait row5 (index4) has "Y Y Y" at columns 5,6? Actually row5: "Y . . . . Y Y": leftmost Y at col0, then Y at col5, Y at col6. So rightmost column col6 has Y in rows 0,4. Also there is Y at col5 row4 (second from right). But output only 3x3, maybe they compress both wings into center of width 3: left wing maps to left column of output, right wing maps to right column of output, and middle column maybe from overlapping? Let's examine. Output rows 3: row0: Y . Y. So leftmost Y corresponds to left wing Y at row0. Rightmost Y corresponds to right wing Y at row0. Good. Row1: . . . (both wings empty). Input row1 had no Y in left/right columns. So output row1 all empty. Row2: Y Y Y. Input row4 (index4) had left Y at col0, right Y at col6, and also Y at col5 (second from right). Output row2 has three Y's across. So maybe the middle column of output captures any Y that were in the interior (not just far right) but within the right wing? Wait interior Y at col5 is one column left of rightmost. That could be considered part of right wing? The description: performers standing only in far-left and far-right wings, while center empty. But there is Y at col5 which is not far-right wing (col6). However maybe the "wing" includes all columns except the central empty region? But they said far-left and far-right wings. In example, there are Y's at col5 (second from right) maybe considered part of right wing because right wing width maybe 2 columns? Let's think. The output width is 3: left, center, right. So they compress the whole width into three columns: leftmost column of output corresponds to any colored cells in leftmost column of input? Rightmost column of output corresponds to any colored cells in rightmost column of input? Center column of output corresponds to any colored cells that are in any column that is not leftmost or rightmost? But in example1, there were Y's at col5 (second from right) which would map to center column? Output row2 center column is Y, yes. So rule: For each row, output three columns: left = presence of any colored cell in leftmost column of input row; center = presence of any colored cell in any interior column (excluding leftmost and rightmost); right = presence of any colored cell in rightmost c ... [11983 chars truncated]
"Two garden beds flanking a gravel path have scattered seedlings — when the path is removed and the beds are pushed together, every spot with a root from either bed blooms."
120b: fail
See: A wide plot has plants only along its far-left and far-right borders, with bare soil running through the center.
Do: Slide the two planted borders together, eliminating the barren middle. Wherever either bed had a seedling, a flower appears in the merged garden.
Grid: The wide plot becomes a compact bed dense with blooms from both original borders.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is rectangular, with "plants only along its far-left and far-right borders, with bare soil running through the center." So leftmost column and rightmost column have colored cells (non-black) maybe. The rest are black '.'. Goal: slide the two planted borders together, eliminating middle. Wherever either bed had a seedling, a flower appears in the merged garden. So we compress columns: take left border and right border and bring them adjacent, overlapping? The output grid becomes compact bed dense with blooms from both original borders. So output width is maybe number of columns = something like left border + right border combined? In example 1: Input grid 5 rows? Let's examine. Example 1 Input lines: Y . . . . . Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y . . . . Y Y Let's count columns: 7 columns. Leftmost column: column0 values: row0 Y, row1 ., row2 ., row3 ., row4 Y. Rightmost column: column6 values: row0 Y, row1 ., row2 ., row3 ., row4 Y. Also there are Y's at row4 column5? Actually row4: "Y . . . . Y Y" meaning columns:0 Y,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 Y,6 Y. So there is also Y at column5 (second from right). So right border includes column5 and column6? The description says far-right border maybe includes multiple columns? Let's see pattern: maybe there are plants along both far-left and far-right edges, possibly multiple columns of plants (maybe contiguous). In example, right side has Y at column5 and column6 in bottom row, and Y at column6 top row. So not just border column. Goal: slide the two planted borders together, eliminating barren middle. So we need to take left side region (columns with any non-black) and right side region (columns with any non-black) and bring them together side by side, removing empty columns between. Essentially compress the grid horizontally by removing columns that are all '.' (black). The output grid will have only columns that contain at least one non-'.' in the input. Also when overlapping? "Wherever either bed had a seedling, a flower appears in the merged garden." Means if after sliding, there may be overlapping columns (if left and right regions overlap after removal) then we combine: if either side had a colored cell, output that color? But which color? Possibly if both have colors, maybe they both appear? But output cell can only hold one color. Maybe they overlay, and if both have a color, maybe they become something else? Let's examine example. We need to compute output for example 1 to infer rule. Input grid 5 rows x7 cols. Let's list columns: col0: Y . . . Y col1: . . . . . col2: . . . . . col3: . . . . . col4: . . . . . col5: . . . . Y col6: Y . . . Y Now remove columns that are all '.' (col1-4). That leaves columns 0,5,6. So output width 3 columns. Output rows 5. Now we need to map colors. Output given: Y . Y . . . Y Y Y Let's map rows: Row0 output: Y . Y Row1: . . . Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: Y Y Y Now compare with input rows for columns 0,5,6. Row0 in ... [1870 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains exactly two colors. One color (the border color) forms an L-shape consisting of one complete row and one complete column that share a single corner cell (the L-corner). The other color (the fill color) occupies the remaining rectangular region. The L-corner is always at one of the four corners of the grid.
Do: 1. Identify the border color (the L-shaped row+column) and the fill color (the rectangle). Identify the L-corner where the border row and column meet. 2. Layer 0 (outermost): Replace every cell in the border row and border column with the fill color, then set the L-corner cell to azure (A). 3. Layer 1 (one step inward): On the row adjacent to the border row (toward the grid center) and the column adjacent to the border column (toward the grid center), write the border color into all cells that are not already part of Layer 0. Then set the corner cell where this inner row and inner column meet to azure (A). 4. Interior: Fill all remaining cells (those not in Layer 0 or Layer 1) with azure (A). Then draw a diagonal of the fill color starting from the interior corner nearest the L-corner and extending one cell per step toward the diagonally opposite corner of the interior, for min(interior_height, interior_width) cells.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. It uses the same two colors from the input plus azure (A). The grid can be any rectangular shape; the L-shaped border may appear in any of the four corner orientations (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right).
"A corner fortress wall collapses inward, leaving rubble layers and a crack running through the foundation."
120b: k=3
See: A fortress stands at one corner of the land. Its walls form an L-shaped rampart — one wall running the full length of a border row and another running the full length of a border column, meeting at a watchtower in the corner. The interior courtyard is filled with a single color of stone.
Do: The fortress is struck and its walls collapse inward. The outermost rampart crumbles: the wall stones transform into courtyard stone, and the watchtower corner is replaced by azure rubble. One step inward, the fallen wall leaves a shadow — a single row and column of the original wall color mark where the debris landed, with another piece of azure rubble at their intersection. Beyond this debris line, azure dust fills the entire interior — except for a deep diagonal crack of courtyard stone that splits the foundation, running from the corner nearest the old watchtower outward toward the opposite corner, one cell per step, as far as the smaller dimension of the interior allows.
Grid: The land keeps its original shape. The ruins are built from three materials: the old wall stone, the courtyard stone, and azure rubble. The fortress watchtower may have stood at any of the four corners of the land.
We need to decode rule. We have description: fortress L-shaped rampart along border row and column meeting at corner (watchtower). Interior courtyard filled with single color. So input grid: one corner has a different color? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid 5x6? Actually lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 rows, then "O O O O O O". So dimensions 5 rows? Wait count rows: first four rows are "W W W W W O" (6 columns). Then fifth row "O O O O O O". So 5 rows, 6 columns. The L-shaped rampart: walls are W (maroon) along top row? Actually top row is W W W W W O: first five cells W, last O. Left column? Let's view grid: column0 all rows? Row0 col0 W, row1 col0 W, row2 col0 W, row3 col0 W, row4 col0 O. So left column has W for first four rows, then O at bottom row. Bottom row is all O. Rightmost column? column5 values: rows0-3 O, row4 O. So the L shape maybe along top row (full length) and left column (full length) meeting at top-left corner? But top row has W except last cell O. So top row length 5 W then O. Left column has W for rows0-3, then O at row4. So L shape of W along top row (first 5 cells) and left column (first 4 rows). The interior courtyard is O (orange) filling rest of grid (including bottom row and rightmost column). So indeed fortress at top-left corner. Output example1: Let's see transformation. Output grid same size 5x6. Provided output rows: Row0: A W A A O W Row1: A A W A O W Row2: A A A W O W Row3: O O O O A W Row4: W W W W W A Interpretation: Azure (A) appears where walls collapsed? The outermost rampart crumbles: wall stones become courtyard stone (O) and watchtower corner replaced by azure (A). In output, the original W walls (top row and left column) have been transformed: The outermost wall (the original W) becomes A? Actually look at top row: original W W W W W O. Output top row: A W A A O W. So first cell (corner) becomes A (azure). The next cells? original W at col1 becomes W still? Actually output col1 is W (unchanged). col2 original W becomes A. col3 original W becomes A. col4 original O becomes O (unchanged). col5 original O becomes W (now W). Hmm. Let's map rule more concretely: The description says: outermost rampart crumbles: wall stones transform into courtyard stone, and watchtower corner replaced by azure rubble. One step inward, the fallen wall leaves a shadow — a single row and column of the original wall color mark where the debris landed, with another piece of azure rubble at their intersection. Beyond this debris line, azure dust fills the entire interior — except for a deep diagonal crack of courtyard stone that splits the foundation, running from the corner nearest the old watchtower outward toward the opposite corner, one cell per step, as far as the smaller dimension of the interior allows. So we need to produce output with three materials: old wall color (W), courtyard stone (O), azure (A). The interior after transformation is azure except a diagonal of courtyard stone. Let's test ... [11600 chars truncated]
"A cell membrane folds inward during endocytosis, its outer proteins retreating as cytoplasm rushes to fill the vacuole, while a strand of DNA threads diagonally through the new organelle."
120b: fail
See: Two cellular substances form an L-shaped membrane along one corner, enclosing a uniform cytoplasm.
Do: The membrane inverts inward layer by layer, the cytoplasm claims the outer surface, and a new neutral medium floods the interior while a protein filament stretches corner to corner through the void.
Grid: Same dimensions. Original two colors swap at the boundary layers, azure fills the interior, and a diagonal trace of the original fill color appears inside.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input grid dimensions? Input lines: 5 rows? Actually given: W W W W W O W W W W W O W W W W W O W W W W W O O O O O O O That's 5 rows, 6 columns. So shape: left 5 columns are W, rightmost column O for first 4 rows, bottom row all O. Output grid same dimensions 5x6: A W A A O W A A W A O W A A A W O W O O O O A W W W W W W A Let's map positions. Let's index rows 0-4, cols0-5. Input: Rows0-3: cols0-4 = W, col5 = O. Row4: all O. So there is an L-shaped membrane: W region (blue? Actually W is maroon) forms vertical bar left side and top rows? Actually W occupies a rectangle of 4 rows x5 cols (top-left). O occupies rightmost column of first 4 rows and entire bottom row. So two colors: W and O. L shape: W region is like a block, O region is like an L shape? Let's visualize: W block top-left, O forms an L around bottom and right side. Output: Colors swapped at boundary layers, azure (A) fills interior, diagonal trace of original fill color appears inside. Let's see output: A appears in many positions interior. The original fill color? Which is the original fill color? In description: "original two colors swap at the boundary layers, azure fills the interior, and a diagonal trace of the original fill color appears inside." So original fill color maybe the interior of original L? Not sure. Look at output: Many A's (azure) appear in interior region where originally W? Let's map. Output grid: Row0: A W A A O W Row1: A A W A O W Row2: A A A W O W Row3: O O O O A W Row4: W W W W W A Let's compare to input. Input row0: W W W W W O Output row0: A W A A O W Positions: col0: W->A (changed to A) col1: W->W (same) col2: W->A (changed) col3: W->A (changed) col4: W->O (changed to O) col5: O->W (changed) Row1 input: W W W W W O Output: A A W A O W col0: W->A col1: W->A col2: W->W (same) col3: W->A col4: W->O col5: O->W Row2 input: W W W W W O Output: A A A W O W col0 A, col1 A, col2 A, col3 W, col4 O, col5 W Row3 input: W W W W W O Output: O O O O A W col0 O (was W), col1 O, col2 O, col3 O, col4 A, col5 W Row4 input: O O O O O O Output: W W W W W A col0-4 W (was O), col5 A (was O) Observations: The outermost layer (boundary) seems to swap colors: W becomes O? Actually at row3 col0-3, W became O (swap). Row4 col0-4 O became W (swap). Row0 col4 W became O (swap). Row0 col5 O became W (swap). Row1 col4 W->O, col5 O->W. Row2 col4 W->O, col5 O->W. So the outer boundary (the L shape) swapped colors. Inside the interior (non-boundary) cells become A (azure). Also there is a diagonal trace of original fill color appears inside: In output we see a diagonal of W? Let's see: positions where original fill color (maybe W) appears inside interior besides boundary? In output we have W at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,5?) Actually (3,5) is W but that's boundary. The diagonal from top-left to bottom-right inside the interior: (0,1) W, (1,2) W, (2,3) W. That's a dia ... [11852 chars truncated]
"A corona flaring from the corner of a binary star system collapses inward; the companion star's light claims the outer halo, dark matter fills the void between them, and a jet of plasma shoots diagonally from the point of gravitational collapse."
120b: fail
See: Two stellar bodies: one radiates an L-shaped corona along the corner, the other uniformly fills the remaining field.
Do: The corona inverts—companion light takes the outer shell, the original star retreats one layer, dark energy floods the interior, and a plasma jet of the companion color streaks diagonally from the corner.
Grid: Same field dimensions, three colors: swapped luminosity layers, dark interior, diagonal jet.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have colors: Input and output grids. Example1 Input 5x6? Let's count rows: lines: W W W W W O (6) repeat 4 rows same, then O O O O O O (6). So 5 rows, 6 columns. Output 5 rows 6 columns. Let's map. Input grid: top 4 rows: first 5 columns W, last column O. Bottom row all O. So pattern: a vertical stripe of O on rightmost column for top rows, and bottom row all O. So shape: an L-shaped corona? The description: one star radiates L-shaped corona along corner, other fills remaining field. So maybe O is the "companion" color? In input, O forms L shape (right column + bottom row). The rest (W) is other color. Output: Let's write coordinates. I'll index rows 0-4, cols0-5. Input: Rows0-3: cols0-4=W, col5=O. Row4: cols0-5=O. Output rows: Row0: A W A A O W Row1: A A W A O W Row2: A A A W O W Row3: O O O O A W Row4: W W W W W A Let's see transformation: The L shape (O) seems to have moved outward? In output, O appears at row3 col0-3 (four O's) and also at row0-2 col4? Actually O at col4 rows0-2? Let's check: Row0 col4 = O, Row1 col4=O, Row2 col4=O. So O forms a vertical line at column4 rows0-2, plus a horizontal line at row3 col0-3. That's an L shape shifted one layer inward? In input L was at rightmost column (col5) rows0-3 and bottom row row4 all columns. Output L is at column4 rows0-2 and row3 columns0-3. So moved one step towards interior (up and left) i.e., the original star retreats one layer, dark interior (A) fills interior, and companion color (O) forms outer shell? Wait O is still the L shape but moved inward by one cell (both directions). The rest of cells become? The original W (maroon) appears now at bottom row row4 col0-4 (W) and at column5 rows0-3 (W). So W forms the opposite L shape (right column and bottom row) but shifted outward? Actually W appears at column5 rows0-3 (same as original O column) and row4 col0-4 (same as original O bottom row). So W swapped positions with O? Not exactly: In input, O L shape at right column and bottom row. In output, O L shape moved one step inward (col4 rows0-2, row3 col0-3). W L shape moved outward? It occupies original O positions? Yes column5 rows0-3 (original O column) and row4 col0-4 (original O bottom row). So W now occupies original O L shape. So they swapped? But O moved inward, not to original W area (which was interior). The interior (non-L) originally W (except O column) becomes A (azure) in output. So interior turned to new color A (maybe dark energy). Also there is a diagonal jet of companion color? In description: "plasma jet of the companion color streaks diagonally from the corner." In output we see A's forming diagonal? Let's see A positions: Row0 col0,2,3? Actually row0: A at col0,2,3? Row0: A W A A O W => A at col0,2,3. Row1: A A W A O W => A at col0,1,3. Row2: A A A W O W => A at col0,1,2. Row3: O O O O A W => A at col4. Row4: W W W W W A => A at col5. So A forms a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Let's map: positions ... [9808 chars truncated]
"A breakwater sheltering a harbor corner is overtopped by the tide; the open-water current sweeps over the seawall, harbor water retreats behind the inner jetty, calm shallows fill the basin, and a rip current of harbor water pulls diagonally from the breakwater's elbow."
120b: fail
See: Two waters: a breakwater of one color forms an L along the corner, open water of another color fills the harbor.
Do: The tide reverses—open water claims the outer breakwater, harbor water retreats one layer inward, calm azure fills the basin, and a rip current of the harbor color runs diagonally from the corner.
Grid: Same basin shape with three colors: swapped water layers, azure interior, diagonal current.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with shape: seems rectangular. Input example1: dimensions? Input lines: 5 rows? Actually list: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 rows then "O O O O O O". So 5 rows, 6 columns. Output also 5 rows 6 columns. Interpretation: Colors: W=maroon, O=orange, A=azure. Input pattern: left side columns 1-5 are W, column6 is O for first 4 rows. Bottom row all O. So shape: a breakwater L: vertical bar of W on left side? Actually W forms a block of 5x5? Wait columns 1-5 rows1-4 are W, column6 rows1-4 O, bottom row all O. So shape: L of W? The W region is a rectangle 4 rows x5 columns (top-left). That's like a breakwater of one color forming an L along the corner? Hmm. Output: Let's map. Output rows: 1: A W A A O W 2: A A W A O W 3: A A A W O W 4: O O O O A W 5: W W W W W A Let's write coordinates (row, col). Input had W region top-left 4x5. O region right column and bottom row. Output seems to have azure A filling interior area (maybe the basin). The outer breakwater (original W) now becomes outermost? The description: tide reverses—open water claims the outer breakwater, harbor water retreats one layer inward, calm azure fills the basin, and a rip current of the harbor color runs diagonally from the corner. Interpretation: Original "open water" is O (orange). "breakwater" is W (maroon). Harbor water maybe also O? Actually open water fills harbor originally? Let's think. In input, O occupies rightmost column (vertical) and bottom row (horizontal). That's like an L shape of O along the outer edges (right and bottom). W occupies top-left block. In output, O appears still at column5? Let's see: column5 values rows1-4 are O, row5 column5 is W? Actually row5 col5 is W (since row5 is "W W W W W A": col5 W). So O column5 (col5) rows1-4 remain O. Column6 values rows1-4 are W, row5 col6 A. So O moved? Not exactly. Also there is a diagonal of O? Let's see diagonal from corner (top-left?) In output, O appears at (1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,1?) Actually row4 col1 is O, row5 col? row5 col? Not O. So diagonal O from top-right to bottom-left? Let's list O positions: Row1: col5 O, col6 W? Wait row1: A W A A O W => O at col5. Row2: A A W A O W => O at col5. Row3: A A A W O W => O at col5. Row4: O O O O A W => O at col1-4, also col5 A, col6 W. Row5: W W W W W A => no O. So O forms a vertical line at col5 rows1-3, plus a horizontal line at row4 col1-4. That's like original O shape shifted inward? Original O shape was vertical line at col6 rows1-4, and bottom row row5 all O. So they moved one step inward (toward interior) and changed orientation? Actually they moved left/up by one? The vertical line moved from col6 to col5 (left one). The horizontal line moved from row5 to row4 (up one). So "harbor water retreats one layer inward". Yes. Now "open water claims the outer breakwater": The original breakwater W (maroon) was top-left block. In output, W appears now on outer perimeter? Let's see W positions: Row1 ... [11257 chars truncated]
"A corner-grounded circuit trace carrying one signal is desoldered and its pads are claimed by the adjacent signal; the original trace retreats to an inner bus, a neutral dielectric fills the board, and a via of the pad color punches diagonally from the ground corner across layers."
120b: fail
See: Two signals on a PCB: one routes an L-shaped trace along the corner, the other fills the remaining copper pour.
Do: Swap the outer trace with the pour signal, push the original trace one layer inward, flood the interior with a dielectric, and route a diagonal via of the pour color from the ground corner.
Grid: Same board dimensions with three layers: swapped edge traces, dielectric interior, diagonal via.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x6? Let's see: Input example 1 lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 rows, then "O O O O O O". So 5 rows? Actually first four rows have 6 columns, last row also 6. So 5 rows x6 columns. Output grid also 5x6. We need to see transformation: description: Two signals on a PCB: one routes an L-shaped trace along the corner, the other fills the remaining copper pour. Swap outer trace with pour signal, push original trace one layer inward, flood interior with dielectric, route diagonal via of pour color from ground corner. Interpretation: Input has L-shaped trace of one color along outer edges? Let's examine input: outermost? Input has W (maroon) in first 4 rows columns 1-5, and O (orange) in column6 for first 4 rows. Bottom row all O. So pattern: top-left area (first 4 rows, first 5 columns) is W, rightmost column (col6) rows1-4 is O, bottom row all O. So L-shaped trace maybe W along top and left edges? Actually W occupies a rectangle 4x5 top-left, not just edges. O occupies rightmost column and bottom row, forming an L shape (right column down, bottom row left). So maybe pour is W (fills interior) and trace is O (L shape). Output: we need to swap outer trace with pour, push original trace inward, flood interior with dielectric (maybe new color A azure), and route diagonal via of pour color from ground corner. Output grid: let's map. Output rows: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A Let's write coordinates (r,c). Input size 5x6. We need to see new pattern: The pour color (originally W) now becomes outer trace? In output, W appears along rightmost column? Actually column6 values: row1 W, row2 W, row3 W, row4 W, row5 A. So not exactly. Let's list each color. Original colors: W and O. Output also includes A (azure) new dielectric. Interpretation: The outer trace (originally O L shape) swapped with pour (W). So now outer trace should be W? In output, W appears along bottom row (row5 columns1-5) and also column6 rows1-4? Actually column6 rows1-4 are W, bottom row col6 is A. So W forms an L shape along bottom row and rightmost column, same as original O L shape. So indeed O (original trace) swapped with W (pour). So now trace color is W (makes L shape). Good. Push original trace one layer inward: original trace O moved inward (diagonal?) In output, O appears in rows1-4 column5? Let's see column5 values: row1 O, row2 O, row3 O, row4 A, row5 W. Actually column5 rows1-3 O, row4 A. Also O appears in row4 columns1-4 (O O O O). So O forms a block? Let's map O positions: (1,5), (2,5), (3,5), (4,1-4). That's like an L shape shifted one cell inward (up-left?) Original O L shape was right column (col6) rows1-4 and bottom row (row5) cols1-5. Shifted inward would be col5 rows1-3 and row4 cols1-4. That's exactly O positions. So original trace moved one layer inward (towards interior). Good. Flood interior with dielectric (new color A). The interior region (the area n ... [10649 chars truncated]
"A river god guarding the L-shaped banks of a sacred confluence cedes the shore to a forest spirit; the god retreats one step into the current, divine light floods the waters, and a serpent of the forest spirit's color slithers diagonally from the confluence point."
120b: fail
See: Two divine realms: one claims an L-shaped riverbank at the corner, the other fills the hinterland.
Do: The bank deity yields the outer shore to the forest spirit, retreats one layer inward, celestial light fills the interior, and a serpent traces diagonally from the corner where the banks met.
Grid: Same map size, three divine colors: swapped boundary layers, light interior, diagonal serpent.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with three colors: boundary region (L-shaped riverbank) and interior (hinterland). The description: "Two divine realms: one claims an L-shaped riverbank at the corner, the other fills the hinterland. What to do: The bank deity yields the outer shore to the forest spirit, retreats one layer inward, celestial light fills the interior, and a serpent traces diagonally from the corner where the banks met." Interpretation: Input has an L-shaped region of one color (maybe O) at corner (top-left?) and rest another color (maybe G). Output: swap boundary layers? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid 5x6? Actually rows: 5 rows? Let's count: Input lines: W W W W W O (6) W W W W W O W W W W W O W W W W W O O O O O O O (5 rows, 6 columns). So shape: leftmost column? Actually O column is rightmost column? In rows 1-4, last column O, rest W. Row5 all O. So O forms an L shape: top rows have O at rightmost column, bottom row all O. That's an L shape at bottom-right corner? Actually corner at bottom-right? The L shape is along right edge (vertical) and bottom edge (horizontal). That's an L shape at bottom-right corner. Other color W fills rest (top-left area). So "bank deity" maybe O (riverbank) yields outer shore to forest spirit (W) -> outermost layer becomes W? Let's see output. Output grid 5x6: A W A A O W A A W A O W A A A W O W O O O O A W W W W W W A Now colors: A azure, W maroon, O orange. So after transformation, we have new colors: A appears inside, O appears on some border, W appears on outermost? Let's map. Original O L shape: rightmost column rows1-4, bottom row all O. Output: O appears in column5? Actually output row1: positions: col1 A, col2 W, col3 A, col4 A, col5 O, col6 W. So O at col5 (second last) row1. Row2 O at col5. Row3 O at col5. Row4 O at col1-4? Row4: O O O O A W (so O at col1-4). Row5: W W W W W A (no O). So O region shifted? It seems O moved one layer inward: originally O formed L at outermost border (rightmost column and bottom row). After transformation, O is now one cell inward: rightmost column becomes W (outermost), O now at column5 (one left) for rows1-3, and bottom row O now at column1-4? Wait bottom row originally row5 all O. After transformation row4 (since indexing shift?) Actually bottom row originally row5 all O. After transformation row4 (second last) has O O O O A W (so O at columns1-4). Row5 (last) has no O. So O moved up one row and left one column (inward). So "bank deity yields the outer shore to the forest spirit, retreats one layer inward". Yes O moved inward by one cell from outer border. Now "celestial light fills the interior": interior becomes A (azure). Indeed many A appear inside region where previously W? Let's see interior area (excluding outermost border after O moved). The interior (non-border) now filled with A except where O line? In output, many A's forming diagonal? Actually there is also a "serpent traces diagonally from the corner wher ... [11132 chars truncated]
"A lead dancer holding the corner of the formation peels away as the ensemble surges forward to claim the edge; the lead steps one mark upstage, a spotlight wash floods the vacated floor, and a solo dancer chassés diagonally from the corner across the empty stage."
120b: fail
See: Two groups of dancers: one forms an L-shape in the corner, the other fills the remaining formation.
Do: The corner group retreats one position, the ensemble claims the outer line, a neutral wash covers the floor, and a soloist of the ensemble's color moves diagonally from the corner.
Grid: Same stage grid, three colors: swapped edge formations, wash interior, diagonal soloist.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with three colors: In each example, input has two colors? Actually example1 input uses W and O. Output uses A, W, O. So new color A appears. Example2 input uses G and M. Output uses M, G, A. Example3 input uses B and X. Output uses A, B, X. Example4 input uses B and M. Output uses A, B, M. So rule: Introduce A (azure) as new color. Metaphor: Two groups of dancers: one forms an L-shape in the corner, the other fills the remaining formation. The corner group retreats one position, the ensemble claims the outer line, a neutral wash covers the floor, and a soloist of the ensemble's color moves diagonally from the corner. Interpretation: Input has an L-shaped region of one color (maybe the "corner group") and the rest filled with another color (the "ensemble"). The L shape is at top-left corner? Let's examine examples. Example1 input: 5x6? Actually rows: 5 rows? Let's count: Input lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 times, then "O O O O O O". So grid 5 rows, 6 columns. The pattern: first 4 rows have W in first 5 columns, O in last column. Last row all O. So L shape? The corner group maybe O? Let's see: O occupies rightmost column (vertical line) and bottom row (horizontal line) forming an L shape at bottom-right corner? Actually O forms an L shape at bottom and right edges, meeting at bottom-right corner. That's an L shape in corner (bottom-right). The rest (W) fills remaining area (top-left rectangle). So corner group = O (color O). Ensemble = W. Output: Let's view output grid 5x6: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A We need to see transformation: "corner group retreats one position" meaning the L shape moves one step inward? In output, O's appear? O's originally at rightmost column rows1-4 and bottom row all columns. In output, O's now at column5 rows1-3? Actually row1 col5 is O, row2 col5 O, row3 col5 O, row4 col1-4 O, row4 col5 A, row4 col6 W, row5 col6 A. Let's map coordinates (1-index). Input O positions: (r,6) for r=1..4, and (5,c) for c=1..6. That's L shape along right edge and bottom edge. Output O positions: (1,5), (2,5), (3,5) (vertical line shifted left by 1). Also bottom row O? Row4 has O O O O (columns1-4) (that's one row above bottom). So bottom horizontal line moved up one row. So indeed L shape retreats one position (up and left) i.e., moves one step towards interior (northwest). So corner group (O) shifted one cell up and left. Now "ensemble claims the outer line": The ensemble color (W) now occupies the outermost border? Let's see output: W appears at many positions: Row1 col2 is W, col6 W; Row2 col3 W, col6 W; Row3 col4 W, col6 W; Row4 col6 W; Row5 col1-5 W. So outermost border (top row, left column, right column, bottom row) are W except where other things placed? Actually top row col1 is A, not W. So not exactly. Let's think: After moving L shape, the remaining area (previously W) maybe gets transformed: "a neutral wash c ... [11860 chars truncated]
"A basalt dike intruding along two edges of a corner outcrop is weathered back one layer; the surrounding sandstone claims the exposed surface, freshite fills the eroded interior, and a quartz vein of sandstone color streaks diagonally from the dike's junction."
120b: fail
See: Two rock types: one forms an L-shaped intrusion along the corner, the other fills the host rock.
Do: Erode the outer dike layer and replace it with host rock, push the dike material one layer inward, fill the interior with a new mineral, and run a quartz vein diagonally from the corner junction.
Grid: Same outcrop dimensions with three minerals: swapped edge layers, new mineral interior, diagonal vein.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid transformation described metaphorically: "Two rock types: one forms an L-shaped intrusion along the corner, the other fills the host rock. What to do: Erode the outer dike layer and replace it with host rock, push the dike material one layer inward, fill the interior with a new mineral, and run a quartz vein diagonally from the corner junction." Interpretation: Input grid has two colors: one forms L-shaped intrusion along corner (maybe a border of one color along top row and left column?). The other fills rest (host rock). Output: outer layer replaced with host rock (so outermost border becomes host rock color). Then push dike material one layer inward (so the L shape moves inward by one cell). Fill interior with new mineral (maybe azure A). And run a quartz vein diagonally from corner junction (maybe a line of some other color along diagonal from corner where L meets?). Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid size? Input lines: 5 rows? Actually given: W W W W W O W W W W W O W W W W W O W W W W W O O O O O O O So 5 rows, 6 columns. Colors: W (maroon) and O (orange). The L-shaped intrusion likely is O? Let's see pattern: O appears in last column of first four rows, and entire bottom row is O. That's an L shape along rightmost column and bottom row (corner at bottom-right). So O is the dike (intrusion) forming L shape along outer edges (right column and bottom row). Host rock is W filling rest. Output grid: A W A A O W A A W A O W A A A W O W O O O O A W W W W W W A Let's map dimensions: output also 5x6. Now we need to see transformation: outer dike layer eroded and replaced with host rock. The outermost layer of O (the L) is replaced with W? Let's see output: bottom row originally O O O O O O becomes? Output bottom row: W W W W W A. So bottom row now mostly W (host rock) except last cell is A (new mineral). Rightmost column originally O in rows 1-4, now? Output column 6 values: row1 O? Actually row1 col6 is W (since row1: A W A A O W). Wait row1 col5 is O, col6 W. So rightmost column now: row1 W, row2 W, row3 W, row4 W, row5 A. So O's have been removed from outermost border, replaced by W except maybe some new A. Now "push the dike material one layer inward": The O's should move one cell inward from original L shape. Indeed we see O appears now at column5 rows1-4 (one column left from original column6). Also bottom row O's moved up one row? Actually bottom row originally O across columns1-6. In output, row4 (second last) is O O O O A W (row4). That's O across columns1-4, column5 A, column6 W. So O's now occupy row4 columns1-4 (one row up from original bottom row). So the L shape moved inward (up and left) by one cell. Now "fill the interior with a new mineral": The interior of the L shape (the area enclosed by the L?) In output we see many A's (azure) inside. Let's see positions of A: row1 col1 A, col3 A, col4 A? Actually row1: A W A A O W => A at col1, col3, col4. Row2: A A W A ... [10929 chars truncated]
"A crêpe folded into a corner pocket is unfolded and flipped—its browned side now faces out, the batter side faces in, and a drizzle of honey traces a line from where the fold began across the open surface."
120b: fail
See: Two ingredients form a corner-folded shape: one lines the edges, the other fills the center.
Do: Unfold and invert the layers so the filling coats the outside, the crust retreats one step inward, and a golden glaze floods the open interior with a syrup line running diagonally from the crease.
Grid: Output matches input size with swapped border layers, azure interior, and a diagonal of the original fill color.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with border of one color and interior of another? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: lines show 5 rows? Actually Input lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 times, then "O O O O O O". So 5 rows, 6 columns. So input: first 4 rows have W in first 5 columns, O in last column. Last row all O. Thus border? The left/top edges are W, rightmost column O, bottom row O. So two ingredients: W lines edges (except bottom and right?), O fills rest? Actually interior (non-edge) cells? Let's see interior cells: rows 1-4, columns 1-5 are W (edge). The interior (if any) would be rows 2-3? but still W. So maybe shape is corner-folded: one lines edges (W) and other fills center (O). Indeed O fills bottom row and rightmost column, making an L shape (corner). So two colors: W (edge) and O (center fill). Output: size same 5x6. Output shows swapped border layers, azure interior, and diagonal of original fill color. Let's view output grid: Row1: "A W A A O W" Row2: "A A W A O W" Row3: "A A A W O W" Row4: "O O O O A W" Row5: "W W W W W A" Let's map positions. Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-5. Input colors: If col0-4 rows0-3 = W, col5 rows0-3 = O, row4 all O. So shape: a corner L of O along bottom row and rightmost column, with W elsewhere. Now output: appears to have swapped border layers: The previous edge W becomes interior? Let's see output border: top row has A W A A O W. Not uniform. Rightmost column (col5) values: rows0-4 = W,W,W,W,A. That's similar to original left edge? Original left edge (col0) rows0-3 = W, row4 = O. Not same. Maybe rule: rotate 90 degrees? Let's compare. If we take original O L shape (bottom row + right column). In output, there is a diagonal of original fill color (O) running from top right? Actually diagonal of original fill color (O) appears? Let's see O positions in output: row0 col4 = O, row1 col4 = O, row2 col4 = O, row3 col0-3 = O O O O, row4 col0-4 = W? Wait row4 col0-4 are W, col5 A. So O's form a shape: column 4 rows0-2 (vertical line) and row3 columns0-3 (horizontal line). That's like original O shape but shifted inward one step? Indeed original O L was bottom row (row4) and rightmost column (col5). In output, O L is moved one step up and left: column 4 (instead of 5) rows0-2 (instead of rows0-3) and row3 (instead of row4) columns0-3 (instead of 0-5). So the "crust retreats one step inward". So the O shape moves inward by one cell (both directions). Good. Now the "filling coats the outside": The other color (W) becomes border? In output, W appears along top row col1? Actually W appears at positions: row0 col1 = W, row0 col5 = W, row1 col2 = W, row1 col5 = W, row2 col3 = W, row2 col5 = W, row3 col5 = W, row4 col0-4 = W. So W forms a diagonal line from top-left? Not exactly. Let's see pattern: W appears along a diagonal from (0,1) to (2,3) and also rightmost column and bottom row. This seems like original edge W moved outward? The "crust retreats one step inw ... [12299 chars truncated]
"A bass drone note anchoring the corner of a chord progression yields its position to the melody, which swells outward while a new harmonic tone saturates the middle register and a glissando slides diagonally across the score."
120b: fail
See: Two voices in a composition: one sustains an L-shaped drone along the edges, the other fills the remaining harmonic space.
Do: The drone retreats inward by one voice, the melody expands to claim the outer register, a shimmering new tone floods the center, and a sliding note traces a diagonal from the corner of the original drone.
Grid: Same dimensions. Three tonal colors in the output: swapped edge layers, a new tone in the interior, and a diagonal line.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 1: Let's write dimensions. Input: Row1: W W W W W O (6 columns) Rows1-4 same? Actually rows 1-4 are "W W W W W O". Row5: O O O O O O. So grid 5 rows, 6 cols. Interpretation: L-shaped drone along edges: maybe a column of W on left side and a row of O at bottom? Let's see input: leftmost column is all W (rows1-4) and also row5 all O. Also column6 (rightmost) is O for rows1-4? Actually each row1-4 ends with O, so rightmost column also O. So shape: top rows have W across first 5 columns, O at column6. Bottom row all O. So L shape? Actually W forms a rectangle 4x5 top-left, O forms rightmost column and bottom row. Output grid 5x6: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A Let's analyze transformation. Output seems to have swapped edge layers: The outermost layer (border) maybe swapped colors? In input, border consists of W on top row? Actually top row: W W W W W O (border includes top row, left column, right column, bottom row). In output, top row becomes A W A A O W. Not just swap. Let's map positions. Create coordinates (r,c) 0-index. Input matrix I: Rows0-3: columns0-4 = W, column5 = O. Row4: all O. Output O: Row0: col0 A, col1 W, col2 A, col3 A, col4 O, col5 W Row1: col0 A, col1 A, col2 W, col3 A, col4 O, col5 W Row2: col0 A, col1 A, col2 A, col3 W, col4 O, col5 W Row3: col0 O, col1 O, col2 O, col3 O, col4 A, col5 W Row4: col0 W, col1 W, col2 W, col3 W, col4 W, col5 A Observations: The original W region (top-left 4x5) seems to have been shifted down/right? In output, W appears along a diagonal from (0,1) to (3,5) and also bottom row all W (row4 col0-4). Actually bottom row row4 col0-4 are W (original top-left region maybe moved down). Also column5 rows0-4 are W? Let's see column5: rows0-4 values: W,W,W,W,W? Actually row0 col5 W, row1 col5 W, row2 col5 W, row3 col5 W, row4 col5 A. So column5 is W except bottom cell A. In input column5 rows0-3 were O, row4 O. So W moved to column5. Seems like the "drone" (L shape) retreats inward by one voice: original L shape comprised of W (vertical left edge) and O (horizontal bottom edge) plus O right edge? Actually L shape maybe W along left edge and O along bottom edge, forming an L. In output, that L shape moved inward (right and up) by one cell: new L shape of W? Let's see new L shape: W now appears along bottom row (row4) columns0-4 (original left edge moved down? Not exactly). And also along rightmost column (col5) rows0-3 (original bottom edge moved right?). So the L shape rotated? Wait. Original L: left column of W (rows0-3) and bottom row of O (row4). That's an L shape (vertical left, horizontal bottom). Output: left column now? Not W but O at rows3? Actually column0 rows0-2 are A, row3 O, row4 W. So left column not L. But maybe the L shape is composed of two colors: W vertical, O horizontal. In output, those colors swapped positions: W becomes horizontal bottom (row4) and vertical right (col5). O ... [11555 chars truncated]
"A defensive line holding the corner of the field is pushed back one yard; the offense surges into the vacated territory while a referee's flag traces a diagonal from the original line of scrimmage into open field."
120b: fail
See: Two teams occupy the pitch: one forms an L-shaped defensive wall along one corner's edges, the other fills the interior.
Do: The defense falls back one layer, the offense claims the perimeter, neutral ground opens across the interior, and a marker cuts diagonally from where the corner defender stood.
Grid: Same grid size with three colors: the two originals swapped at the edges and a new color flooding the interior with a diagonal.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with two colors: one forms L-shaped wall along edges (defense) and other fills interior (offense). The transformation: defense falls back one layer, offense claims perimeter, neutral ground opens across interior, and a marker cuts diagonally from where the corner defender stood. Interpretation: Input has L shape of one color along top row and left column? Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's list rows. Example1 Input: Row1: W W W W W O Row2: W W W W W O Row3: W W W W W O Row4: W W W W W O Row5: O O O O O O So dimensions 5x6? Actually 5 rows, 6 columns. Colors: W (maroon) and O (orange). L-shaped defensive wall? Let's see: W occupies first 4 rows, first 5 columns (a rectangle). O occupies column 6 all rows, plus row5 all columns. So shape: W forms a block top-left, O forms rightmost column and bottom row. That's like an L shape of O? Wait O occupies rightmost column (col6) rows1-5, and bottom row (row5) all columns. That's an L shape of O along bottom and right edges. W fills interior (top-left block). So defense = O (L shape), offense = W interior. Output Example1: Rows: 1: A W A A O W 2: A A W A O W 3: A A A W O W 4: O O O O A W 5: W W W W W A Now colors: A (azure) new color, W, O. Interpretation: defense (O) falls back one layer: originally O at rightmost column and bottom row. After transformation, O appears where? In output, O appears at column5 rows1-3? Actually row1 col5 is O, row2 col5 O, row3 col5 O, row4 col1-4 O O O O, row4 col6 W, row5 col1-5 W, row5 col6 A. So O moved inward one layer from edges: originally at rightmost column (col6) rows1-5, now at col5 rows1-3 (since row4 col5 is A). Also bottom row originally row5 all O, now O appears at row4 col1-4 (one row up). So O shifted up/left by one cell (defense falls back one layer). Good. Offense (W) claims perimeter: originally interior W (top-left block). After transformation, W appears on outer perimeter? In output, W appears at row1 col2? Actually row1 col2 is W, row1 col6 is W, row2 col3? Let's map. Let's write coordinates (r,c). Input size 5x6. Output grid: Row1: col1 A, col2 W, col3 A, col4 A, col5 O, col6 W Row2: col1 A, col2 A, col3 W, col4 A, col5 O, col6 W Row3: col1 A, col2 A, col3 A, col4 W, col5 O, col6 W Row4: col1 O, col2 O, col3 O, col4 O, col5 A, col6 W Row5: col1 W, col2 W, col3 W, col4 W, col5 W, col6 A We see W now occupies a diagonal from (1,2) to (5,5) plus rightmost column rows1-5? Actually rightmost column col6 rows1-5 are W. Also bottom row row5 col1-5 are W. So W claims perimeter (rightmost column and bottom row) plus maybe also some interior diagonal? Wait bottom row row5 col1-5 are W (perimeter). Rightmost column col6 rows1-5 are W (perimeter). Also there is a diagonal of W from (1,2) to (4,5?) Actually (1,2) W, (2,3) W, (3,4) W, (4,5) A not W. So diagonal of W stops before hitting O? Hmm. But description: "neutral ground opens across the interior, and a marker cuts diagonally from where ... [10748 chars truncated]
"A cold front hugging the corner of a pressure map retreats as warm air rushes over it, leaving a calm eye across the interior and a jet stream slicing diagonally from the point where the fronts first collided."
120b: fail
See: Two air masses meet at an L-shaped front along one corner of the map, with a uniform mass filling the remainder.
Do: The front inverts—warm air claims the outer boundary, cold air shrinks one layer inward, clear sky fills the interior, and a wind shear traces a diagonal from the collision corner.
Grid: Output grid matches input dimensions with swapped frontal layers, azure interior, and a diagonal streak.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: Input has two regions: one L-shaped front? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 5x6? Actually lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 rows, then "O O O O O O". So 5 rows, 6 columns. Input: top 4 rows: first 5 columns W, last column O. Bottom row all O. So pattern: a vertical stripe of O on rightmost column, and bottom row O across. So L-shaped region of O covering rightmost column and bottom row (including corner). Rest is W. Output grid same dimensions 5x6. Output rows: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A Let's map positions. Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-5. Input O positions: (r,5) for r=0..3, and (4,c) for c=0..5. So L shape. Output: seems to have swapped? The O's moved? In output, O appears at (0,4), (1,4), (2,4), (3,0-3?), actually row4 (index3) has O O O O A W: first four columns O, column4 A, column5 W. Row5 (index4) has all W except last column A. So O region now is top rows? Let's see: Output O positions: (0,4), (1,4), (2,4), (3,0-3). That's an L shape rotated? The original L was along rightmost column and bottom row. New L is along column 4 (second last) for top three rows, and row3 (index3) first four columns. So it's shifted inward one layer? The description: "warm air claims the outer boundary, cold air shrinks one layer inward, clear sky fills the interior, and a wind shear traces a diagonal from the collision corner." Colors: warm = maybe A (azure). cold = O? Actually O is orange (maybe cold?). Clear sky = maybe A? Wait azure is A. In output, azure appears interior? In example1, azure A appears in many interior cells (positions not O or W). Let's see: Output A positions: many. They seem to fill interior of L shape? Let's map. Original W region (warm?) becomes outer boundary? In output, outer boundary (edges) are W except some A? Row0 col0 is A (not W). Hmm. Let's think differently: The transformation seems to rotate the L shape 90 degrees clockwise? Original L: vertical line on rightmost column (col5) rows0-3, horizontal line bottom row (row4) cols0-5. After transformation, L appears at column4 rows0-2 (vertical) and row3 cols0-3 (horizontal). That's like moved one step up and left (inward). So the "cold air shrinks one layer inward". So O region (cold) moved inward by one cell (both directions) forming new L shape one cell away from outer boundary. The "warm air claims the outer boundary": W region (warm) now occupies outermost border? In output, outermost border cells are W except where overwritten by O? Let's check border: top row col0-5: A W A A O W. Not all W. So not exactly. Maybe warm air (W) moves to fill previous O positions? In output, W appears at positions where O was originally? Original O at col5 rows0-3 and row4 all cols. Output W at col5 rows0-3? Yes row0 col5 W, row1 col5 W, row2 col5 W, row3 col5 W, row4 col0-4 W. So W moved to original O positions (outer boundary). So warm claims outer boundary (o ... [10034 chars truncated]
"Two walls forming an L-shaped corridor are demolished from the outside in; the façade material replaces the corridor's inner lining, exposed sky fills the atrium, and a skylight crack runs diagonally from the original corner joint."
120b: fail
See: A building with an L-shaped corridor of one material bordering a room of another material, meeting at one corner.
Do: Strip the outer corridor and reclad it in the room's material, push the corridor material one layer inward, flood the interior with glass, and let a fracture of the room material trace diagonally from the corner.
Grid: Same footprint, three materials visible: swapped layers at the edge, new material inside, diagonal line.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have colors: Input shows L-shaped corridor of one material bordering a room of another material, meeting at one corner. In examples, corridor is one material (maybe W in ex1, G in ex2, B in ex3) forming L shape: top row and left column? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid size? Provided lines: 5 rows? Actually lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 times, then "O O O O O O". So 5 rows, 6 columns. Visualize: first 4 rows have W in first 5 columns, O in last column. Last row all O. So corridor: left side? The W region forms a 4x5 block (top-left) and O region forms bottom row and rightmost column, forming L shape? Actually O region is bottom row (row5 all O) and rightmost column (col6 rows1-4 O). That's an L shape of O bordering a room of W? Wait description: building with L-shaped corridor of one material bordering a room of another material, meeting at one corner. So corridor is O (the L) bordering room of W (the interior). Indeed O forms L shape around W interior (top-left interior). The corner where they meet is bottom-right of interior? Actually O L shape meets at bottom-right corner of interior (row4 col5?). Now output: "A W A A O W" etc. Let's map transformation. We need to "Strip the outer corridor and reclad it in the room's material, push the corridor material one layer inward, flood the interior with glass, and let a fracture of the room material trace diagonally from the corner." Interpretation: Outer corridor (the L) is removed (strip) and replaced with room material (W). Then the corridor material (O) is pushed one layer inward (so O becomes interior L one cell inside). Then interior (the original room) is filled with glass (maybe A? azure?). And a fracture (line) of room material (W) traces diagonally from the corner (where L meets). So we get diagonal line of W from that corner outward? Let's verify with output. Input dimensions 5x6. Let's label coordinates (r,c). Input: W region: rows1-4, cols1-5. O region: rows1-4, col6 and row5 all cols1-6. Output grid given: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A Let's map. First, outermost border? The original O L shape (rightmost column rows1-4, bottom row) is now partly changed: bottom row now is W W W W W A (so first five cells become W (room material) and last cell A (glass). Rightmost column rows1-4 now are W (last column values row1 col6 = W, row2 col6 = W, row3 col6 = W, row4 col6 = W). So outer corridor replaced with room material W. Good. Now the corridor material O is pushed one layer inward: we see O appears at row4 col1-4 (the bottom of original interior? Actually row4 col1-4 are O O O O). Also O appears at rows1-3 col5 (col5 values row1 O, row2 O, row3 O). That's an inner L shape one cell inside original O L. Indeed original O L was at col6 and row5. Move inward one cell: col5 rows1-3 and row4 col1-4 (since row5 moved up to row4). Yes matches. Now interior (original room) which ... [11755 chars truncated]
"A garrison holding the L-shaped ramparts of a corner bastion is flanked; the besiegers seize the outer wall, the garrison retreats one trench inward, no-man's-land fills the interior, and a sapper's tunnel cuts diagonally from the bastion's cornerstone."
120b: fail
See: Two forces: one occupies an L-shaped fortification along the corner, the other holds the interior courtyard.
Do: The outer force breaches the wall and claims the rampart, the defenders fall back one layer, neutral ground opens across the interior, and a tunnel of the courtyard color diagonals from the corner.
Grid: Same dimensions, three colors: two swapped at the perimeter layers, neutral interior with a diagonal.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 5x6? Let's see example1 input: rows: "W W W W W O" (6 columns) repeat 4 rows same, then "O O O O O O" (6 columns). So 5 rows, 6 cols. Output grid 5x6: Row1: "A W A A O W" Row2: "A A W A O W" Row3: "A A A W O W" Row4: "O O O O A W" Row5: "W W W W W A" We need to map transformation described metaphorically: "Two forces: one occupies an L-shaped fortification along the corner, the other holds the interior courtyard. What to do: The outer force breaches the wall and claims the rampart, the defenders fall back one layer, neutral ground opens across the interior, and a tunnel of the courtyard color diagonals from the corner. Grid details: Same dimensions, three colors: two swapped at the perimeter layers, neutral interior with a diagonal." Interpretation: Input has two colors: maybe outer L shape (like top rows and left column?) and interior color. In example, input colors: W (maroon) and O (orange). The grid: first 4 rows have W in first 5 columns, O in last column. Last row all O. So shape: an L shape of W along top rows and leftmost columns? Actually W occupies top 4 rows, columns 1-5 (a rectangle). O occupies rightmost column of first 4 rows, plus entire bottom row. So O forms an L shape along bottom row and rightmost column. So two forces: one occupies L-shaped fortification along the corner (maybe W along top-left corner), other holds interior courtyard (O interior?). But interior courtyard maybe the area not occupied by either? In this case there is no interior neutral area; whole grid is filled with W or O. Transformation: "The outer force breaches the wall and claims the rampart, the defenders fall back one layer, neutral ground opens across the interior, and a tunnel of the courtyard color diagonals from the corner." Result output: three colors appear: A (azure), W, O. So new color A introduced (maybe neutral). In output, we see A appears in a diagonal from top-left corner downwards right? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Output grid: Row1: A W A A O W Row2: A A W A O W Row3: A A A W O W Row4: O O O O A W Row5: W W W W W A Let's write matrix 5x6. Positions of O: column5 rows1-3 have O, column1-4 rows4 have O, column6 rows1-4 have W? Wait column6 rows1-4 are W, row5 column6 is A. Actually row5 col6 = A. Positions of W: many. Positions of A: forms a triangle? Let's see coordinates of A: (1,1), (1,3), (1,4), (2,1),(2,2),(2,4),(3,1),(3,2),(3,3),(4,5),(5,6). That's like a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right but with some extra. Maybe rule: swap outer perimeter colors (W and O) and fill interior with new color A, plus a diagonal of original interior color? But original interior color? In input there is no interior distinct color; only two colors. So maybe treat one as outer force (the L shape) and other as interior courtyard (the other L shape). Then after transformation, outer force breaches wall and claims rampart: meaning outer color expands outward by one layer (into previous interio ... [12904 chars truncated]
"A spotlight illuminating the corner of the stage dims and the chorus steps forward into its beam; the lead retreats to the wings by one mark, the stage floods with a neutral wash, and a follow-spot traces a diagonal from downstage corner to the opposite wing."
120b: fail
See: Two lighting zones: one forms an L-shape in the corner, the other fills the rest of the stage.
Do: Swap the lighting at the edge—chorus light moves out, lead light steps back one layer—then wash the interior in a new hue while a spotlight traces diagonally from the corner.
Grid: Same stage dimensions, three light colors with swapped edges, new wash, and a diagonal beam.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colors. Input shows L-shaped region of one color? Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions? Let's count rows: 5 rows? Actually given lines: W W W W W O (6 columns) repeat 4 rows then O O O O O O (6 columns). So 5 rows, 6 columns. Input pattern: first 4 rows have first 5 columns W, last column O. Fifth row all O. So shape: L shape of O? Actually O occupies rightmost column of first 4 rows, and entire bottom row. That's an L shape (corner at bottom right). The rest (top-left 4x5) is W. Output grid same dimensions 5x6. Output: A W A A O W A A W A O W A A A W O W O O O O A W W W W W W A Let's map positions. We need to see transformation: edges swapped? "Swap the lighting at the edge—chorus light moves out, lead light steps back one layer—then wash the interior in a new hue while a spotlight traces diagonally from the corner." Interpretation: The L-shaped region (O) maybe moves outward? In output, O appears where? In output, O appears in column5 rows1-3? Actually output rows: Row1: A W A A O W (col5 O) Row2: A A W A O W (col5 O) Row3: A A A W O W (col5 O) Row4: O O O O A W (col1-4 O, col5 A) Row5: W W W W W A (col6 A) So O now occupies leftmost 4 columns of row4 (previous bottom row) and column5 rows1-3 (previous rightmost column). So O moved one step left/up? Actually original O shape: rightmost column rows1-4, bottom row all columns. In output, O shape is top? Let's see: O now occupies column5 rows1-3 (instead of column6) and row4 columns1-4 (instead of row5). So O shifted up one row and left one column? Not exactly: original bottom row (row5) becomes row4 columns1-4 O, but column5? original bottom row had O in all columns, now row4 col5 is A (new hue). So O lost the bottom-right corner cell (row5 col6) which becomes A. Also O lost the top-left? Actually O didn't appear in row5 at all; row5 col6 is A. So transformation: The L shape moved diagonally up-left by one cell (i.e., each O cell moved to (row-1, col-1) maybe). Let's test: original O at (row1,col6) would move to (0,5) out of bounds, maybe disappears? Indeed not present. Original O at (row2,col6) -> (1,5) which is row2 col5 O in output? Yes row2 col5 O. Original O at (row3,col6) -> (2,5) row3 col5 O. Original O at (row4,col6) -> (3,5) row4 col5 A (not O). So not consistent. Original O at (row5,col1) -> (4,0) out of bounds, disappears. Original O at (row5,col2) -> (4,1) row5 col2 W (not O). So not simple shift. Maybe rule: swap edge colors: The "edge" meaning the L shape's two arms (the vertical and horizontal) swap colors? In output, the vertical arm (rightmost column) becomes O? Actually vertical arm now is column5 rows1-3 O (still vertical). Horizontal arm now is row4 columns1-4 O (still horizontal). So shape remains L but moved one step inward (away from outer border) i.e., the L shape shrinks by moving one cell away from outer edges (the outermost border). The new interior (the area inside ... [10599 chars truncated]
"A hedge border running along two edges of a corner plot is pruned back one row; wildflowers from the interior spill over the old hedge line, fresh mulch covers the opened bed, and a vine creeps diagonally from the corner post across the garden."
120b: fail
See: A garden with an L-shaped hedge of one species bordering a plot filled with another, sharing a corner post.
Do: Cut the hedge back one row, let the plot flowers claim the outer border, lay mulch across the interior, and train a vine of the plot color diagonally from the corner post inward.
Grid: Same plot dimensions with three colors: swapped border layers, mulch interior, and a diagonal vine.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids with L-shaped region: one species border (like a column of one color on left and a row of same color on top?) Actually description: L-shaped hedge of one species bordering a plot filled with another, sharing a corner post. So input likely has a solid block of one color (say left column) and top row? Let's examine Example1 input: 5x6? Actually lines: "W W W W W O" repeated 4 rows, then "O O O O O O". So grid 5 rows? Wait count rows: first four rows are "W W W W W O" (5 W then O). That's 5 columns? Actually there are 6 entries per row: W W W W W O => 5 W then O. So width 6. Height 5. The pattern: left 5 columns are W, rightmost column is O for first four rows. Bottom row all O. So shape: an L-shaped region of W (vertical bar left side? Actually W occupies first 5 columns of top 4 rows, forming a rectangle, not L). But O occupies rightmost column of top rows and entire bottom row. That's like an L shape of O? Let's think: O forms a border: rightmost column (height 4) plus bottom row (width 6). That's an L shape of O, sharing corner at bottom-right. W fills the rest (a rectangle). So the "hedge" maybe O? The description: L-shaped hedge of one species bordering a plot filled with another, sharing a corner post. So O is hedge, W is plot. Transformation: "Cut the hedge back one row, let the plot flowers claim the outer border, lay mulch across the interior, and train a vine of the plot color diagonally from the corner post inward." Interpretation: Output: border layers swapped? Let's see output Example1: grid same size 5x6. Output rows: "A W A A O W" "A A W A O W" "A A A W O W" "O O O O A W" "W W W W W A" Let's map colors: A=azure (new color), W=original plot color, O=original hedge color. The output shows new color A appears in many places, seems to be mulch interior? Let's analyze. Original plot (W) interior (excluding border?) In input, W region is 5x4 rectangle (rows 0-3, cols 0-4). The hedge O region is L shape: column 5 rows0-3, and row4 all columns. Transformation: "Cut the hedge back one row" meaning reduce the L shape by removing its outermost row? In output, O appears where? Output shows O in column 4 rows0-2? Actually row0: "A W A A O W": positions: col0 A, col1 W, col2 A, col3 A, col4 O, col5 W. So O at col4 row0 (originally W). Row1: "A A W A O W": O at col4 row1. Row2: "A A A W O W": O at col4 row2. Row3: "O O O O A W": O at cols0-3 row3 (originally O bottom row). Row4: "W W W W W A": no O. So O now forms a border of width 1 around interior? Actually O appears along left side? Not exactly. Let's think of rule: maybe we rotate colors? The new color A appears in interior where originally W? Actually interior of W (excluding border) becomes A? Let's compute interior of original W region: original W region 5x4 rectangle. Its border cells are those on outer edge of that rectangle: rows0 and3, cols0 and4. The interior cells are rows1-2, cols1-3 (a 2x3 area). In output, ... [11146 chars truncated]
See: The input grid consists of concentric rectangular rings, each filled with a single color. The outermost ring is one color, the next ring inward is a second color, the next is a third, and so on. There are exactly three distinct colors used across all rings. If there are more than three rings, the colors cycle, so the fourth ring reuses the first color, the fifth reuses the second, and so on.
Do: 1. Identify the concentric rectangular rings from outermost to innermost, noting the color of each ring. 2. List the distinct colors in the order they first appear going inward, producing a sequence [C1, C2, C3]. 3. Apply a cyclic shift backward (rotate left by one position): C1 maps to C3, C2 maps to C1, and C3 maps to C2. In other words, each color is replaced by the one that preceded it in the sequence, with the first color wrapping around to become the last. 4. Rebuild the grid with the same ring structure but with each ring's color replaced according to this mapping. The grid dimensions and ring geometry remain unchanged.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input grid. The structure of concentric rectangular rings is preserved exactly — only the color assigned to each ring changes. The rings are axis-aligned rectangles, uniformly one cell thick, nested from the border inward to the center.
"Russian nesting dolls rotate their painted shells inward"
120b: k=1
See: The grid is a set of nested picture frames, each painted a different color, stacked like matryoshka dolls from the outer wall to the hidden center. Three paint colors take turns dressing each successive frame as they spiral inward.
Do: The dolls play a game of musical chairs: when the music stops, each doll puts on the coat of the doll that was standing just inside it. The outermost doll inherits the innermost color, as if the smallest doll's secret heart has been turned inside out to become the new skin of the world.
Grid: The frame structure is sacred — no frame moves, shrinks, or grows. Only the paint on each frame changes, as though every shell has been carefully unscrewed, the colors passed one neighbor inward, and the whole thing reassembled in place.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with nested frames. Example 1: Input grid 8x8. Let's write coordinates. Input outer border is A (azure). Next inner border (one cell inside) is . (black) except corners? Actually row2: A . . . . . . A. So second row has A at ends, interior . . . . . . . So inner border is . (black). Next inner border (third row) has A . X X X X . A. So third row: first A, then ., then X X X X, then ., then A. So third layer: X (grey) interior rectangle. Then fourth row: A . X A A X . A. So inside that, there is A region (azure) inside X region. So pattern: nested frames of colors: outermost A, then . , then X, then A, then inner core maybe .? Actually inner core is 2x2 of A? Let's see rows 4-5 columns 4-5 are A A. So inner core is A. So frames: colors sequence from outer to inner: A, ., X, A (inner core). Output grid: colors shifted? Output shows outermost border now X (previous third layer). Let's examine output: first row all X. So outermost becomes X (previous third layer). Second row: X A A A A A A X. So second row border X, interior A's. So second layer becomes A (previous outermost). Third row: X A . . . . A X. So third layer becomes . (previous second layer). Fourth row: X A . X X . A X. So fourth layer becomes X (previous third layer). Fifth row same. Sixth row: X A . . . . A X. Seventh row: X A A A A A A X. Eighth row all X. Thus rule: rotate colors of frames inward? Actually each frame takes color of the next inner frame (the one just inside it). The innermost frame takes color of outermost? Let's see innermost (center 2x2) in output: rows4-5 cols4-5 are X X (from previous third layer). In input innermost was A. So innermost got color of previous third layer (one step outward). So seems each frame takes color of the frame just outside it? Wait outermost took color of third layer (two steps inward). Let's map layers indices: layer0 outermost, layer1 next, layer2 next, layer3 innermost (core). Input colors: L0=A, L1=., L2=X, L3=A. Output colors: L0=X (was L2), L1=A (was L0), L2=. (was L1), L3=X (was L2). So it's a cyclic shift of colors forward by one layer? Actually mapping: each layer gets color of layer+2? Let's see shift: L0 gets L2, L1 gets L0, L2 gets L1, L3 gets L2. That's like each layer takes color of the layer just inside it (i.e., inner neighbor) but outermost takes innermost? Wait L0 takes L1? No L0 took L2 not L1. So maybe they rotate three colors taking turns? The description: "Three paint colors take turns dressing each successive frame as they spiral inward." So there are three colors rotating. In example, colors involved are A, ., X (three colors). They rotate inward: each frame gets color of the next inner frame, but the innermost gets color of outermost? Let's test: If we rotate inward (each frame takes color of inner neighbor), then L0 would get L1 (.), but output L0 is X, not . So not that. If rotate outward (each frame takes color of outer neighbor), then L0 would get L-1 (none) maybe innermos ... [6750 chars truncated]
"Cell membranes exchange their protein coats during mitotic inversion"
120b: k=3
See: A cell with nested membrane layers, each stained a different color, three pigments cycling through the layers from cortex to nucleus
Do: Each membrane sheds its identity and adopts the pigment of the layer that was once deeper within — the outermost membrane takes on the hue of the innermost, as though the cell turned partially inside-out in a single enzymatic pulse
Grid: Same concentric layered structure, same dimensions, but each layer now wears a different stain than before
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Example1: Input is 8x8 with outer border A, then inner layers: second layer '.' border, third layer X, fourth layer A (a 2x2 block), etc. Output: outer border becomes X (was outer A). Next layer becomes A (was '.'?), inner becomes '.'? Let's map. Let's label layers from outermost to innermost. Input layers: Layer0 (outermost border cells): A Layer1 (next border): . (the cells at positions with distance 1 from edge) Layer2: X (distance 2) Layer3: A (distance 3) but only a 2x2 block at center? Actually input shows a 2x2 A block at positions (3,3)-(4,4) (0-index). That's innermost. So three pigments cycling: A, ., X, A? Wait pigments: A, ., X, A (same as outer). The description says three pigments cycling through layers from cortex to nucleus. So maybe there are three distinct colors: A, ., X. The innermost also A repeats outer. Transformation: each membrane sheds its identity and adopts pigment of layer that was once deeper within — outermost takes hue of innermost, etc. So shift colors outward by one layer (inner to outer). So new outer layer becomes color of previous inner layer (layer1 becomes layer0? Actually outermost takes hue of innermost). In example, outermost becomes X? Wait innermost was A (center). But output outermost is X, not A. Let's examine deeper. Maybe the mapping is: each layer takes color of the layer just inside it (i.e., shift outward). So layer0 (outer) takes color of layer1 (which was .). But output outer is X, not . So not that. Let's compute layers of output: Output outer border is X. Which layer originally had X? That's layer2. So outer took color of layer2 (two layers deeper). Next layer (layer1) output is A. Original layer0 was A. So layer1 took outer's original color. Next layer (layer2) output is . (original layer1). Next layer (layer3) output is A (original layer2? Actually original layer2 was X, not A). Wait output inner 2x2 block is A (same as original outer). So seems rotation of colors among layers: maybe cyclic shift outward by two layers? Let's list original colors per layer (from outer to inner): L0: A L1: . L2: X L3: A (inner) But note L3 same as L0, duplicate. Output layers: L0': X L1': A L2': . L3': A So mapping: L0' = L2, L1' = L0, L2' = L1, L3' = L0 (or L3 original). Not consistent. Maybe rule is: each layer takes color of the layer that was once deeper within, but "deeper within" meaning the next inner distinct color region, not counting repeats? The description: three pigments cycling through layers from cortex to nucleus. So there are three pigments: A, ., X. They appear in order from outer to inner: A (outer), . (next), X (next), then repeats A (inner). So cycle length 3. The transformation: each membrane sheds its identity and adopts pigment of the layer that was once deeper within — outermost takes hue of innermost, as though cell turned partially inside-out. So we rotate the cycle: each layer takes color of the layer that is one step ... [10542 chars truncated]
"Nested orbital shells exchange their spectral signatures in a retrograde cascade"
120b: k=1
See: Concentric rectangular orbital zones around a stellar core, each emitting one of three spectral colors that cycle as you approach the center
Do: A gravitational perturbation sends each shell's spectral emission one orbit inward — the outermost halo's light wraps down to the core, while every other shell absorbs the wavelength of its former outer neighbor, completing one retrograde color shuffle
Grid: Same nested orbital geometry, same dimensions, but each shell now radiates a different spectral color
We need to infer rule from example. Input is a grid with concentric rectangular shells. Example 1 input: outermost border A, then inner border . (black), then next inner border X, then inner region A etc. Let's map. Input grid 8x8. Let's label coordinates (0-7). Input: Row0: A A A A A A A A Row1: A . . . . . . A Row2: A . X X X X . A Row3: A . X A A X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X X X X . A Row6: A . . . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A A A So shells: outermost (layer0) = A. Next layer (layer1) = . (black) except corners? Actually row1 col1-col6 are . etc. Next layer (layer2) = X (grey) forming a rectangle from (2,2) to (5,5) but with inner region of A at (3,3)-(4,4). So layer3 = A (inner core). So we have 4 layers. Output grid: Row0: X X X X X X X X Row1: X A A A A A A X Row2: X A . . . . A X Row3: X A . X X . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . . . . A X Row6: X A A A A A A X Row7: X X X X X X X X Now layers: outermost becomes X (previous layer2). Next layer becomes A (previous outermost). Next layer becomes . (previous layer1). Next inner core becomes X (previous layer2?) Wait inner core originally A, now X. Let's see mapping: It seems each shell's color moves one layer inward, with outermost receiving color from next outer? Actually description: "outermost halo's light wraps down to the core, while every other shell absorbs the wavelength of its former outer neighbor, completing one retrograde color shuffle". So each shell takes color of the shell just outside it (outer neighbor), and outermost takes color of innermost? Let's test. Layers list from outer to inner: L0=A, L1=., L2=X, L3=A (core). According to rule: each shell gets color of its outer neighbor (i.e., shift inward). So new L1 should become old L0 = A. Indeed output layer1 (second outermost) is A. New L2 should become old L1 = . . Indeed output layer2 is . . . . . . (the . region). New L3 (core) should become old L2 = X. Indeed core becomes X. Outer layer L0 should become old L3 (wrap) = A? But output outermost is X, not A. Wait outermost became X, which is old L2, not old L3. Hmm maybe outermost takes color of the next inner layer (L2) rather than wrap from core. Let's examine: old L2 = X, output outermost = X. So outermost takes color of layer just inside it (inner neighbor). That would be a forward shift outward? But description says outermost wraps down to core. Actually "outermost halo's light wraps down to the core" meaning outermost color moves to core, not core to outermost. So outermost loses its color, core receives outermost. That matches core becomes old outermost (A) but core became X, not A. So maybe I misinterpret. Let's compute mapping based on observed: old L0=A -> new L1 = A (shift inward). old L1=. -> new L2 = . (shift inward). old L2=X -> new L0 = X (shift outward). old L2 also -> new L3 = X (core). Wait core also X. So old L2 appears to copy to both outermost and core. That's weird. But maybe there are only three spectral colors cycling ... [5468 chars truncated]
"Nested tidal bands shift their water colors one current inward at the turning of the tide"
120b: k=2
See: A rectangular harbor viewed from above, ringed by concentric bands of differently colored water — three hues cycling as bands narrow toward a central pool
Do: As the tide turns, each band's water drains inward and fills the next smaller basin, while the central pool's water spills outward to flood the outermost ring — a single tidal rotation recoloring every concentric channel
Grid: Same harbor shape, same nested bands, but each ring of water now carries the color that previously filled a different channel
We need to infer rule. The description: concentric bands of three hues cycling as bands narrow toward central pool. The transformation: each band's water drains inward and fills next smaller basin, while central pool's water spills outward to flood outermost ring — a single tidal rotation recoloring every concentric channel. Interpretation: Input has nested rectangular rings (like frames) each with a color. The transformation rotates colors inward: outermost ring becomes color of next inner ring? Wait description: each band's water drains inward and fills the next smaller basin, while central pool's water spills outward to flood the outermost ring — a single tidal rotation recoloring every concentric channel. So we have a set of concentric layers (rings). The innermost (central pool) moves outward to outermost ring. All other rings shift outward? Actually "drains inward and fills the next smaller basin" means outer ring's water moves inward to fill the next inner ring. So outermost ring's color moves to the next inner ring. The innermost pool's water spills outward to flood the outermost ring. So it's a cyclic rotation of colors among the layers, but direction? Let's think: Suppose we have layers L0 outermost, L1, L2, ..., Ln innermost. According to description: each band's water drains inward (so L0 moves to L1, L1 moves to L2, ...). The central pool (Ln) spills outward to flood outermost ring (L0). So overall colors rotate outward? Actually L0's color goes to L1, L1 to L2, ..., Ln to L0. That's a rotation where each layer takes color of previous outer layer, and outermost takes color of innermost. That's a cyclic shift inward (i.e., colors move one step inward, but innermost moves to outermost). Equivalent to rotate colors outward? Let's test with example. Example1 Input grid: Let's identify layers. The grid is 8x8 with border of A (azure). Inside border there is a ring of '.' (black) maybe? Actually input shows: Row0: A A A A A A A A (outermost border A) Row1: A . . . . . . A (second row: border A at col0 and col7, interior '.') Row2: A . X X X X . A Row3: A . X A A X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X X X X . A Row6: A . . . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A A A So layers: outermost border A (layer0). Next inner ring (layer1) consists of '.' cells forming a rectangle 6x6 border? Actually positions where row1 col1-6 '.' etc. That's layer1 color '.' (black). Next inner ring (layer2) is X (grey) forming a rectangle 4x4 border? Let's see: rows2-5 col2-5 X except where there are A inside (positions (3,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4) are A). So layer2 is X border. Innermost region (layer3) is a 2x2 block of A (azure) at center. Thus layers colors: L0=A, L1='.', L2='X', L3='A'. Now output grid: Let's see layers colors after transformation. Output rows: Row0: X X X X X X X X (outermost now X) Row1: X A A A A A A X Row2: X A . . . . A X Row3: X A . X X . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . . . . A X Row6: X A A A A A A X Row7: X X X X X X X X ... [11863 chars truncated]
"Nested shielding layers cycle their charge states one shell toward ground"
120b: k=1
See: A rectangular circuit board with concentric shielding rings, each carrying one of three voltage colors that repeat as layers approach the core
Do: A discharge event cascades through the shielding: each ring transfers its charge state to the ring one level deeper, while the innermost ring's state arcs back to the outermost casing — a single rotational shift through the entire stack
Grid: Same concentric shielding layout, same board dimensions, each ring now displays a different voltage color than before
We need to infer rule. Input is a rectangular grid with concentric rings. Example: Input 8x8 with outermost ring A, then inner ring . (black), then ring X, then inner region with A etc. Let's map. Input example grid: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So rings: outermost ring (layer 0) = A. Next inner ring (layer1) = . (black). Next inner ring (layer2) = X (grey). Next inner region (layer3) = A (center 2x2). So there are 4 layers. Output grid: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now layers: outermost becomes X (previous layer2). Next becomes A (previous outermost). Next becomes . (previous layer1). Next center becomes X? Wait center 2x2 originally A, now X? Actually output center 2x2 (rows4-5 cols4-5) are X X. Yes they become X (previous layer2). So transformation: each ring's color shifts outward? Let's see mapping: original layers (from outer to inner): L0=A, L1=., L2=X, L3=A (center). Output layers (outer to inner): L0 = X (was L2), L1 = A (was L0), L2 = . (was L1), L3 = X (was L2). So it's like rotate the list of layer colors by one step outward? But note L3 becomes X which was L2, not L0. So rotation: each layer takes color of the layer one level deeper (inner). Innermost wraps to outermost? Wait innermost (L3) gets color of L2 (one deeper). L2 gets color of L1. L1 gets color of L0. L0 gets color of L3? No L0 got X which was L2, not L3. So not simple rotation. Let's examine description: "each ring transfers its charge state to the ring one level deeper, while the innermost ring's state arcs back to the outermost casing — a single rotational shift through the entire stack". That suggests each ring passes its state to the next inner ring, and innermost passes to outermost. That would be: new inner ring gets outer's color, etc. So new layer = previous outer layer? Wait "transfers its charge state to the ring one level deeper": So outermost transfers to next inner (L0 -> L1). So L1 new = L0 old. Similarly L2 new = L1 old, L3 new = L2 old, and innermost (L3) old transfers to outermost (L0 new = L3 old). That would be rotation outward (inner gets outer). Let's test: L0 new = L3 old = A (but output L0 is X). So not matching. Maybe they defined "deeper" as towards core (inner). So each ring gives its state to the ring one level deeper (i.e., inner). So inner becomes outer's old. That's what we just did. Not match. Alternative: each ring transfers its charge to the ring one level deeper, while innermost arcs back to outermost: So innermost's old goes to outermost new. That is rotation outward (inner to outer). So new outer = old innermost. That would give L0 new = A (old L3). Not match. Our observed mapping: L0 new = L2 old (skip one). L1 new = L0 old. L2 ... [8673 chars truncated]
"The nested veils of the underworld pass their enchantments one threshold deeper"
120b: k=1
See: Concentric rectangular veils guarding the underworld's heart, each woven from one of three magical essences that cycle as you descend through successive gates
Do: At the solstice, each veil surrenders its enchantment to the threshold within — the outermost ward's magic sinks to the innermost sanctum, and every other veil absorbs the spell of the gate that once stood beyond it
Grid: Same nested rectangular thresholds, same number of veils, but each gate now shimmers with an enchantment that previously guarded a different depth
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with concentric rectangular "veils" (borders). Example 1 input: outermost border A, then inner border .? Let's view. Input grid 8x8: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So there are three layers: outermost A border (layer0). Next inner border is '.' (layer1) forming a rectangle from (2,2) to (7,7) but with interior. Actually '.' border: positions where row2 col2-7 are ., row7 col2-7 ., col2 rows2-7 ., col7 rows2-7 . So yes a rectangle of '.'. Inside that, there is a rectangle of X border (layer2) from (3,3) to (6,6) with X border, interior contains A's at (4,4),(4,5),(5,4),(5,5) (a 2x2 block). So inner-most region is A. Output grid: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now outermost border becomes X (previously outermost A). Next layer becomes A (previously '.'), next layer becomes '.' (previously X), innermost becomes X? Wait innermost region originally A becomes X? Let's see: In output, the 2x2 block at center is X (positions (4,4),(4,5),(5,4),(5,5) are X). Yes originally they were A. So transformation appears to rotate the colors of layers inward: each layer takes the color of the layer outside it (outermost moves to innermost). But also the innermost moves to outermost? Let's map: Layers (from outer to inner): L0 outer border: A -> becomes X (which was L2 color) L1 next: . -> becomes A (L0 color) L2 next: X -> becomes . (L1 color) L3 innermost region (filled): A -> becomes X (L2 color) Wait L2 color is X, yes. So it's a cyclic shift of colors outward to inward? Actually each layer takes color of the layer just outside it (i.e., shift inward). The outermost takes color of innermost? In example, outermost becomes X which was the color of layer2 (second inner). Not innermost (layer3). Let's list colors per layer depth: Depth0 (outermost border) = A Depth1 = . Depth2 = X Depth3 (center region) = A Shift rule: each depth's color becomes color of depth+1 (i.e., the next inner layer). For depth0 becomes depth1? That would be . but it's X, not . So not that. Maybe each depth becomes color of depth+2? Let's see: depth0 becomes depth2 (X) yes. depth1 becomes depth3 (A) yes. depth2 becomes depth0 (A) but output depth2 is . not A. So not consistent. Maybe the rule is rotate colors among the three "magical essences" that cycle as you descend through successive gates. The description: "each veil surrenders its enchantment to the threshold within — the outermost ward's magic sinks to the innermost sanctum, and every other veil absorbs the spell of the gate that once stood beyond it". That suggests outermost's color moves to innermost, and each other veil takes color of the one that was outside it (beyond it). So sh ... [10954 chars truncated]
"Concentric rings of dancers pass their sashes one circle inward on the downbeat"
120b: k=1
See: Dancers arranged in nested rectangular formations, each ring wearing sashes of one of three colors that cycle as rings tighten toward the center
Do: On the downbeat, every dancer unties their sash and hands it to the dancer one ring closer to the center — the innermost ring's sashes are tossed outward to the perimeter, completing a single rotation of colors across all formations
Grid: Same nested rectangular dancer formations, same stage dimensions, each ring now wears sashes of a different color than before the step
We need to infer rule. Example: Input is 8x8 with outer border A, then inner layers etc. Output shows colors shifted outward? Let's map. Input grid (I'll index rows 0-7, cols 0-7). Input: Row0: A A A A A A A A Row1: A . . . . . . A Row2: A . X X X X . A Row3: A . X A A X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X X X X . A Row6: A . . . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A A A So there are nested rectangles: outermost ring (border) all A. Next inner ring (positions where row=1 or 6 or col=1 or 6, but not border) are '.' (black). Next inner ring (row=2 or5 or col=2 or5) are X (grey). Next inner ring (row=3 or4 or col=3 or4) are A (azure) in corners? Actually row3 col3 = A, row3 col4 = A, row4 col3 = A, row4 col4 = A. So innermost 2x2 is A. Output grid: Row0: X X X X X X X X Row1: X A A A A A A X Row2: X A . . . . A X Row3: X A . X X . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . . . . A X Row6: X A A A A A A X Row7: X X X X X X X X Now outermost ring becomes X (previously A). Next ring becomes A (previously .). Next ring becomes . (previously X). Next innermost becomes X? Wait innermost 2x2 originally A, now they are X? Actually positions (3,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4) in output are X. Yes. So colors have rotated outward by one ring: each ring's color moves to the next outer ring, and outermost ring receives color from innermost ring? Let's see: innermost A moved to outermost X? Not exactly. The innermost A moved to outermost ring? Outer ring now X, not A. The innermost A moved to second outermost? Let's track. Rings: Ring0 (outermost border) color A -> becomes X (color of ring2? Actually ring2 is X) Ring1 (next) color . -> becomes A (color of ring0) Ring2 (next) color X -> becomes . (color of ring1) Ring3 (innermost) color A -> becomes X (color of ring2) So it's like each ring takes color of the ring two steps outward? Wait mapping: ring index i (0 outer) gets color from ring i+2? Let's compute: ring0 gets from ring2 (X). ring1 gets from ring0 (A). ring2 gets from ring1 (.). ring3 gets from ring2 (X). That's not consistent shift of one ring outward; it's like a rotation but with 4 rings, they rotate colors forward by one ring outward? Let's list original colors per ring (starting outermost): [A, ., X, A]. After transformation: [X, A, ., X]. That's a rotation of the list to the right by 1? Original list: A, ., X, A. Rotated right by 1 gives A (last) becomes first? Actually rotate right: last element A becomes first, then A, ., X. That would be [A, A, ., X] not match. Rotate left by 1: [., X, A, A] not match. So not simple rotation. Maybe rule: each ring's color moves outward by one step, but innermost ring's color moves outward to outermost, and outermost's color moves inward to second ring? Let's simulate: shift outward: each ring's color moves to outer ring (i-1). So outermost gets from second outermost? Actually outward shift means color moves to larger radius (outer). So ring i gets color from ring i+1 (inner). For i from outermost to inner-1. Innermo ... [11403 chars truncated]
"Concentric sedimentary strata rotate their mineral deposits one layer toward the surface"
120b: k=3
See: A cross-section of rectangular geological strata nested like a topographic bullseye, each band colored by one of three mineral deposits that cycle as layers deepen toward the core
Do: Tectonic upheaval inverts the depositional order by one step: each stratum's mineral composition shifts to the layer above it, while the surface deposit subducts to the deepest core — a single cyclic displacement through the entire column
Grid: Same nested rectangular strata, same cross-section dimensions, each geological band now shows a mineral color that was previously deposited at a different depth
We need to infer rule. The description: nested rectangular strata like bullseye. Each band colored by one of three mineral deposits that cycle as layers deepen toward the core. The transformation: invert depositional order by one step: each stratum's mineral composition shifts to the layer above it, while the surface deposit subducts to the deepest core — a single cyclic displacement through the entire column. Interpretation: Input grid has concentric rectangular layers (like frames). Each layer has a uniform color (maybe except interior). The rule rotates colors outward/inward by one layer: each layer takes color of layer just inside it? Wait "shifts to the layer above it" meaning each stratum's mineral composition shifts to the layer above it (i.e., moves outward). Surface deposit subducts to deepest core (i.e., outermost layer moves to innermost). So it's a cyclic shift of layer colors inward? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input: outermost border A, then next inner border .? Actually grid 8x8. Let's map layers. Input1: Row1: A A A A A A A A (outer border A) Row2: A . . . . . . A (second row: left/right A, interior .) Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So layers: outermost (layer0) = A border. Next layer (layer1) = positions where distance from edge =1: they are '.' except some X? Actually at row2 col2-col7 are '.' (layer1). Row3 col2 '.' etc. So layer1 is '.' (except interior). Next layer (layer2) = positions distance=2: these are X in many places, but also some A inside? Let's see: positions (3,3) etc. At row3 col3 is X (distance2). Row4 col3 X, row4 col4 A (distance3?). Wait compute distances: For 8x8, center region maybe 2x2? Let's compute layers: distance from nearest border (0-index). Outer border distance0 = A. distance1 = row2-7 col2-7 but not border: those are '.' (except maybe some X?). Indeed row3 col3 is X but distance from border = min(row-1, col-1, 8-row, 8-col). Row3 (index2) col3 (index2) distance = min(2,2,5,5)=2. So X is distance2. So layer2 = X (mostly). Then there is inner 2x2 region of A at rows4-5 col4-5 (indices3-4) distance = min(3,3,4,4)=3? Actually distance3. So layer3 = A. Thus layers colors: layer0 A, layer1 ., layer2 X, layer3 A. Output1: Row1: X X X X X X X X (outermost now X) Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now layers of output: outermost (distance0) = X. distance1 = A. distance2 = . (except some X inside). distance3 = X? Wait inner 2x2 region now X? Actually rows4-5 col4-5 are X in output? Let's see row4 col4 is X (since row4: X A . X X . A X). Yes inner 2x2 region X. So layer3 = X. Thus mapping: original layers [0:A,1:.,2:X,3:A] become [0:X,1:A,2:.,3:X]. That's a cyclic shift outward? Let's see: each layer takes color of layer below it (deeper) i.e., shift outward (toward surface) ... [11324 chars truncated]
"The layered pastry rotates its fillings one shell inward during baking"
120b: k=1
See: A cross-section of a rectangular baklava — concentric bands of dough, each glazed with one of three flavors that repeat as layers deepen
Do: The heat causes each flavor to migrate inward by one shell: the outermost glaze sinks to where the deepest flavor was, and every other flavor shifts to fill the gap left behind, like a conveyor of taste
Grid: The pastry keeps its shape and number of layers, but each concentric band now carries the flavor that previously belonged to its neighbor
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with concentric layers (like a border). In example, input has outer border A, then inner border . (black), then inner region X, etc. Let's examine.
Input example 1 grid 8x8.
Let's label coordinates. Input:
Row1: A A A A A A A A
Row2: A . . . . . . A
Row3: A . X X X X . A
Row4: A . X A A X . A
Row5: A . X A A X . A
Row6: A . X X X X . A
Row7: A . . . . . . A
Row8: A A A A A A A A
So layers: outermost border A (layer0). Next inner border (layer1) is '.' (black) except corners? Actually row2 col2-col7 are '.'; row7 col2-col7 '.'; column2 rows2-7 '.'; column7 rows2-7 '.' . So layer1 is '.'.
Layer2: the region of X forming a ring: positions (3,3)-(3,6), (4,3),(4,6),(5,3),(5,6),(6,3)-(6,6). That's a ring of X.
Layer3: inner 2x2 block of A at positions (4,4),(4,5),(5,4),(5,5). That's inner core.
Now output grid:
Row1: X X X X X X X X
Row2: X A A A A A A X
Row3: X A . . . . A X
Row4: X A . X X . A X
Row5: X A . X X . A X
Row6: X A . . . . A X
Row7: X A A A A A A X
Row8: X X X X X X X X
Now layers: outermost border becomes X (previous layer2). Next inner border becomes A (previous outermost). Next inner border becomes '.' (previous layer1). Next inner border becomes X (previous layer2?) Wait inner core now is X? Actually positions (4,4)-(5,5) are X in output? Let's see row4 col4 is X, row4 col5 X, row5 col4 X, row5 col5 X. Yes inner core becomes X (previous layer2). So transformation: each layer shifts outward? Let's map: original layers from outermost to innermost: L0=A, L1='.', L2=X, L3=A (core). Output layers: L0 becomes L2 (X), L1 becomes L0 (A), L2 becomes L1 ('.'), L3 becomes L2 (X). So each layer moved outward by one? Actually they moved "inward by one shell" according to description: outermost glaze sinks to where deepest flavor was, and every other flavor shifts to fill the gap left behind. That suggests each layer moves inward (toward center) by one, and the innermost moves to outermost? Wait description: outermost glaze sinks to where the deepest flavor was (so outermost moves to innermost). Every other flavor shifts to fill the gap left behind (so each moves outward? Let's think: If outermost moves inward, then the spot it vacated is filled by next outermost moving outward? Actually "shifts to fill the gap left behind" could mean each layer moves outward to fill the previous outer layer's spot. That would be a rotation outward, with innermost moving to outermost. But output shows outermost becomes X (which was layer2, not innermost). Let's compute rotation: Suppose we have layers L0 outermost, L1, L2, L3 innermost. If we rotate outward (each moves outward one), then L0 becomes L1, L1 becomes L2, L2 becomes L3, L3 becomes L0. That would give outermost = L1='.', not X. Not match.
If rotate inward (each moves inward one), then L0 becomes L3 (innermost), L1 becomes L0, L2 becomes L1, L3 becomes L2. That would give outermost = L3=A (but output outermost X). Not match.
Our observed mapping: L0->L2
... [11338 chars truncated]
"Nested resonance chambers pass their tones one register to the left"
120b: fail
See: A series of rectangular sound boxes nested inside each other, each humming one of three tones that cycle as you listen deeper
Do: A harmonic shift propagates through the instrument — each chamber surrenders its tone and begins vibrating at the pitch of the chamber that was one step further inside, with the innermost tone wrapping around to the outermost shell
Grid: Same nested rectangular chambers, same dimensions, but each resonator now sounds a different pitch than it held before
We need to infer rule. Input is nested rectangular chambers. Example: Input grid 8x8 with outer border A, then inner rectangle of . etc. Output shows shift of colors: outermost becomes X (previous inner? Let's map. Input example1 grid coordinates. Let's write layers: Layer0 (outermost border): all A. Layer1 (next rectangle): positions where row 1 col 1..6 etc? Actually second row: A . . . . . . A => border A at edges, interior . . . . . . . So layer1 is the border of inner rectangle? Let's think of nested rectangles: There is outermost A border (size 8). Inside that, there is a rectangle of . (size 6) with border .? Actually second row has A at ends, . inside. So the rectangle of . is the next layer (layer1). Inside that, there is rectangle of X (size 4) with border X? Row2: A . X X X X . A. So inside . rectangle, there is X rectangle. Inside that, there is A rectangle (size2?) Row3: A . X A A X . A. So inner A rectangle of size2x2. So layers from outer to inner: A, ., X, A. Output grid shows outermost becomes X, next becomes A, next becomes . , innermost becomes X? Wait output outer border is X. Next layer (row1 col1..6) are X A A A A A A X. So second row: X A ... A X. So the second layer (previously .) becomes A. Third layer (previously X) becomes .? Let's see interior: rows 2-5 columns 2-5 etc. Output row2 col2 is A? Actually row2 (index2) is "X A . . . . A X". So at position (2,2) is '.'? Wait row2 col2 is '.'? Let's map: Row2 string: X A . . . . A X. So after outer X, then A, then . . . ., then A, then X. So the third layer (previously X) becomes . . . . (i.e., .). The innermost (previously A) becomes ? At row3 col3 is '.'? Actually row3: X A . X X . A X. So inner area includes X X (previously A?). Wait inner 2x2 region originally A A; now becomes X X. So innermost A becomes X. Thus transformation: each layer takes the color of the layer one step deeper (inner), with innermost wrapping to outermost. So shift outward: colors move outward by one layer. Thus rule: rotate colors of nested rectangular shells outward by one. Now apply to test input. Test input 8x8 with outermost G border. Next layer O rectangle (size6). Next layer M rectangle (size4). Inside that there is a rectangle of G? Let's examine rows: Row0: G G G G G G G G (outer border) Row1: G O O O O O O G Row2: G O M M M M O G Row3: G O M G G M O G Row4: G O M G G M O G Row5: G O M M M M O G Row6: G O O O O O O G Row7: G G G G G G G G So layers: Layer0 outer G. Layer1 O border. Layer2 M border? Let's see rectangle of M: rows2-5 cols2-5? At row2 col2 is M, row2 col3 M etc. Row3 col2 M, col3 G (inner). So M rectangle border includes positions where row2 or row5 or col2 or col5 within inner area. Indeed border of inner rectangle is M, interior is G (2x2). So layers: outer G, then O, then M, then inner G (2x2). So colors per layer: L0=G, L1=O, L2=M, L3=G. Now shift outward: each layer takes color of inner layer, innermost wraps to outermost. Thus new layers: New L0 = previo ... [2196 chars truncated]
"Relay runners on nested oval tracks hand their jersey colors backward"
120b: fail
See: Concentric rectangular tracks, each lane painted in one of three team colors, the palette repeating as lanes narrow toward the center
Do: At the whistle, each runner strips their jersey and tosses it to the runner one lane further out, while the outermost runner's jersey wraps around to the innermost lane — a backward hand-off that shifts every team's presence
Grid: Same nested lanes, same arena dimensions, but each track now displays the color of a different team
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with concentric rectangular tracks (layers). In example, input uses colors A (azure) outer border, . black interior, X grey inner rectangle, etc. Output shows colors shifted outward? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid 8x8. Let's label layers: outermost border (layer0) all A. Next inner layer (layer1) positions where row=1 or col=1 or row=6 or col=6 (0-index). Those are '.' except corners? Actually input row1: "A . . . . . . A" so layer1 is '.' except corners are A (since outer border). So layer1 is '.'. Layer2 (row2/col2 etc) forms a rectangle: row2: "A . X X X X . A". So positions (2,2)-(2,5) are X, also (5,2)-(5,5) X, and columns 2-5 rows 2-5 have X except where A appears? Let's see row3: "A . X A A X . A". So at (3,3) and (3,4) are A (inner inner). So layer2 is X except inner 2x2 region of A. Layer3 (innermost) is a 2x2 block of A at positions (3,3),(3,4),(4,3),(4,4). That's inner most. So layers: outermost A, then '.' , then X, then A. Output grid: outermost border becomes X (was A). Next layer becomes A (was .). Next layer becomes . (was X). Next inner becomes A (same as before?). Let's see output row2: "X A . . . . A X". That's layer2 now '.'? Actually row2 corresponds to original layer2 positions (2,2)-(2,5) now '.' . Yes. So rule: rotate colors of layers outward by one step (circular shift). The outermost layer takes color of next inner layer? Wait outermost becomes X which was layer2 color. So shift outward by two? Let's map: original layers colors: L0=A, L1='.', L2=X, L3=A. Output layers: L0=X (from L2), L1=A (from L0), L2='.' (from L1), L3=A (from L3 unchanged?). Actually inner most stayed same? Let's check inner most (2x2) originally A, output also A. So innermost unchanged. So shift for all layers except innermost? The outermost takes color of second innermost? Not exactly. Maybe rule: each runner (color) moves one lane outward (i.e., each layer's color moves outward to next outer layer), and outermost wraps to innermost. But description says "each runner strips their jersey and tosses it to the runner one lane further out, while the outermost runner's jersey wraps around to the innermost lane — a backward hand-off that shifts every team's presence". That suggests each layer's color moves outward (to larger radius). So outermost receives color from innermost (wrap). But in example, outermost became X, which was from layer2, not innermost (layer3). So maybe there are three team colors repeating, not all layers distinct. In example, colors sequence maybe A, ., X, A (repeat). The pattern repeats as lanes narrow toward center: palette repeating. So there are three colors repeating: A, ., X, then repeats A, ., X... In example we have A outer, . next, X next, A inner (repeat). So indeed pattern repeats every 3 layers. The rule: shift each color outward by one lane (i.e., each layer takes color of the layer just inside it). Since pattern repeats, outermost takes color of inner-most (which ... [6087 chars truncated]
"Pressure bands in a rectangular storm rotate their thermal signatures one ring outward"
120b: fail
See: A top-down view of a blocky cyclone — concentric rectangular isobars, each coded with one of three thermal colors that cycle as you approach the eye
Do: The storm's rotation shears each thermal layer loose and pushes it one band toward the periphery, with the outermost band curling back into the eye — a single atmospheric shuffle that recolors every pressure zone
Grid: Same rectangular storm structure, same dimensions, each isobar now carries the thermal signature that previously belonged to a different ring
We need to infer rule. Input is a rectangular "storm" with concentric rectangular rings. In example, input has outer ring A, then inner ring ., then inner ring X, then inner region A etc? Let's examine. Input grid 8x8: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So concentric rectangular layers: outermost ring (border) = A. Next inner ring (positions with row2-7 col2-7 but not deeper) = . (dot). Next inner ring (positions row3-6 col3-6 but not deeper) = X. Next inner region (positions row4-5 col4-5) = A. Thus pattern: colors cycle A -> . -> X -> A as we go inward (three colors cycle). The description says three thermal colors cycle as you approach the eye. So indeed. Now output grid: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now let's see transformation: The outermost ring becomes X (previously innermost X ring). The next ring becomes A (previously outermost A). The next ring becomes . (previously second ring .). The innermost region becomes X? Wait innermost region (center 2x2) originally A, now becomes X? Actually output rows 4-5 col4-5 are X X (yes). So innermost region becomes X (previously outermost? No outermost was A). Let's map: It seems each ring shifts outward by one position (i.e., each thermal layer moves one band toward periphery), and the outermost band curls back into the eye (i.e., outermost becomes innermost). So it's a cyclic rotation of rings outward. Thus rule: Identify concentric rectangular layers (rings). There are N layers. Perform a rotation where each layer's color moves outward to the next outer layer, and the outermost layer's color moves to innermost layer. In example, layers from outermost to innermost: L0=A, L1=., L2=X, L3=A (center). After rotation outward: new L0 = previous L2? Wait outermost becomes X (previous L2). That's two steps? Let's compute: If each layer moves outward by one, then L0 gets previous L1? Actually moving outward means each layer's colors shift outward: the inner layer moves outward to replace outer layer, outermost moves to innermost. So mapping: new L0 = previous L1? Wait inner layer moves outward, so L1 moves to L0, L2 moves to L1, L3 moves to L2, L0 moves to L3. Let's test: previous L1 = . ; but new L0 is X, not . So not that. Maybe each layer moves outward by one band, meaning each color shifts outward by one ring, but the outermost band curls back into the eye (i.e., becomes innermost). So outermost becomes innermost, inner becomes outermost? That would be a rotation opposite direction: new L0 = previous L2? Let's compute rotation of 3 steps? Let's list layers order from outermost to innermost: [A, ., X, A]. After transformation we have [X, A, ., X]. That's a shift of two positions? Let's see mapping: previo ... [8767 chars truncated]
"The nested courtyards of the fortress trade their stone façades in a leftward rotation"
120b: k=1
See: A fortress built as concentric rectangular walls, each faced with one of three types of stone, the materials cycling as you pass through successive gateways toward the keep
Do: The masons dismantle each wall's facing and reassemble it on the wall that stood one ring deeper — the outermost battlements receive the stone that once lined the innermost chamber, completing a full rotation of materials through the stronghold
Grid: Same fortress blueprint, same number of concentric walls, but each wall now shows a different stone facing than before
We need to understand the transformation. Input is a grid with concentric rectangular walls (like a frame). In example, input uses colors A, ., X. Output rotates the materials outward by one ring: outermost becomes inner's material, etc. Let's examine example 1. Input grid 8x8: Row0: A A A A A A A A Row1: A . . . . . . A Row2: A . X X X X . A Row3: A . X A A X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X X X X . A Row6: A . . . . . . A Row7: A A A A A A A A So there are concentric walls: outermost border (positions where row=0 or row=7 or col=0 or col=7) all A. Next inner wall (row=1 or row=6 or col=1 or col=6) are '.' (except corners? Actually corners are A because they belong to outermost). So second ring is '.'. Third ring (row=2 or row=5 or col=2 or col=5) are X (except some positions maybe). Indeed row2 col2-5 are X, row5 col2-5 X, col2 rows2-5 X, col5 rows2-5 X. So third ring X. Fourth ring (row=3 or row=4 or col=3 or col=4) are A (inner core). Indeed row3 col3-4 A, row4 col3-4 A. Thus we have 4 rings: outer A, then ., then X, then A (center). Output grid: Row0: X X X X X X X X Row1: X A A A A A A X Row2: X A . . . . A X Row3: X A . X X . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . . . . A X Row6: X A A A A A A X Row7: X X X X X X X X Now outermost ring becomes X (previous third ring). Next ring becomes A (previous outermost). Next ring becomes . (previous second). Next inner ring becomes A (previous fourth? Wait inner core originally A, after rotation becomes ? In output, inner core (positions row3-4 col3-4) are X? Actually output row3 col3 = X, row3 col4 = X, row4 col3 = X, row4 col4 = X. Yes inner core becomes X (previous third ring). So rotation: each ring takes material from the ring just inside it (deeper). The innermost ring takes material from outermost? Let's see: innermost (center) originally A, after transformation becomes X (which was third ring). That's not outermost. Wait there are 4 rings; rotation by one step outward: each ring's material moves outward to the next outer ring, and outermost receives material from innermost? The description: "outermost battlements receive the stone that once lined the innermost chamber, completing a full rotation of materials through the stronghold". So yes, outermost gets innermost's material. In example, outermost becomes X, but innermost originally A, not X. So maybe there are 3 types of stone cycling, not each ring unique. Let's examine materials per ring: outermost A, second ., third X, fourth A (same as outermost). So there are only three distinct materials: A, ., X. The innermost uses A same as outermost. So rotation of materials: outermost gets material from innermost (which is A) but outermost becomes X, not A. Hmm. Maybe the rule is: rotate the three distinct materials cyclically across rings, regardless of which ring they are in. The order maybe A -> . -> X -> A (cycle). Let's test: outermost originally A becomes X (next in cycle after X? Actually cycle A->.->X->A, so ... [5269 chars truncated]
"Nested defensive perimeters rotate their banner colors one rank toward the rear"
120b: fail
See: Concentric rectangular battle lines, each flying one of three colored banners, the colors cycling as formations deepen toward the command post
Do: A tactical redeployment: each perimeter lowers its banner and raises the one that flew from the line immediately inside it, while the innermost banner cycles out to the vanguard — a single coordinated shuffle of allegiance
Grid: Same defensive geometry, same grid dimensions, each perimeter now flies a banner that belonged to a different formation
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with concentric rectangular "battle lines" each with a color. In example, input has outer border A, then inner border .? Wait let's examine example 1. Input grid 8x8: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So we have outermost border of A (azure). Inside that, a border of . (black) forming a rectangle (positions (2,2)-(7,7) border). Inside that, a border of X (grey) forming rectangle (3,3)-(6,6) border. Inside that, a 2x2 block of A at positions (4,4)-(5,5). So three layers: outer A, middle ., inner X, innermost A. Output grid: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A . . . . A X Row3: X A . X X . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Let's see layers now: outermost border becomes X (previous inner X). Next layer becomes A (previous outer A). Next layer becomes . (previous middle .). Next inner 2x2 becomes A? Wait innermost originally A, after transformation becomes A? Let's examine: In output, the 2x2 block at positions (4,4)-(5,5) is X? Actually output rows 4 and5 columns 4,5 are X X (since row4: X A . X X . A X). So innermost block becomes X (previous inner X). Wait but there is also inner X border earlier. Let's map. Original layers (from outer to inner): L0 (outermost): A L1: . (border) L2: X (border) L3: A (2x2 block) After transformation: L0 becomes X (was L2) L1 becomes A (was L0) L2 becomes . (was L1) L3 becomes X? Actually L3 becomes X (was L2). But L2 already moved outward. So seems each layer takes color of the layer just inside it (i.e., shift colors outward), and innermost takes color of outermost? Wait description: "each perimeter lowers its banner and raises the one that flew from the line immediately inside it, while the innermost banner cycles out to the vanguard". So each layer takes color of inner layer, and innermost takes color of outermost (cycling). That matches: L0 gets L1? Actually "lowers its banner and raises the one that flew from the line immediately inside it": So outermost lowers its banner (i.e., gives up its color) and raises the one from line immediately inside (inner). So outermost becomes color of L1. But in output outermost became X, which was L2, not L1. Wait maybe there are three colored banners cycling: only three colors used? In example, colors used are A, ., X. The innermost also A (same as outermost). So maybe they consider only three distinct colors: A, ., X. The innermost A is same as outermost, so cycle among three colors: outermost becomes inner-most (X), middle becomes outermost (A), inner becomes middle (.). That matches shift outward by one layer (inner to outer) and outermost cycles to innermost? Actually innermost becomes outermost's color? Let's see: innermost originally A, after transformation becomes X (which was outermost? No outermost was A). ... [6537 chars truncated]
"Nested stage curtains pass their spotlight colors one layer backstage"
120b: k=2
See: A proscenium framed by concentric rectangular curtain borders, each lit in one of three gel colors that repeat as you look deeper into the wings
Do: The lighting operator shifts every gel one curtain-depth inward: the footlights' color retreats to the deepest scrim, and each intermediate curtain inherits the color of the one that hung just outside it — a single rotation of the color plot
Grid: Same nested curtain frames, same stage dimensions, each border now glows with a color that was previously assigned elsewhere
We need to understand the transformation. The description: concentric rectangular curtain borders, each lit in one of three gel colors that repeat as you look deeper into the wings. The operator shifts every gel one curtain-depth inward: the footlights' color retreats to the deepest scrim, and each intermediate curtain inherits the color of the one that hung just outside it — a single rotation of the color plot. Interpretation: The grid has nested rectangular frames (borders). Each frame (border) is colored uniformly (maybe with a single color). The transformation rotates colors inward: the outermost border's color moves to the next inner border, etc., and the innermost border's color moves to the outermost? Wait "footlights' color retreats to the deepest scrim" suggests the innermost (deepest) gets the outermost? Actually footlights are at front (outermost) maybe? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input grid 8x8. Let's label colors: A (azure) outer border? Input shows A on outermost border (first and last rows all A, first and last columns all A). Inside there is a pattern: there is a rectangle of X (grey) inside, and inside that A again? Let's view. Input1: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So nested frames: outermost border A. Next inner border (one cell inside) is '.' (black) on top/bottom rows? Actually row2 col2-col7 are '.'; row7 col2-col7 '.'; column2 rows2-7 '.'; column7 rows2-7 '.' So inner border of '.' (black). Next inner border (row3 col3-col6 etc) is X (grey). Next inner border (row4 col4-col5) is A again (a 2x2 block). So there are 4 layers: A outer, . next, X next, A innermost. Output1: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now layers: outermost border X (was previously third layer). Next inner border A (was outermost). Next inner border . (was second layer). Next inner border X (was third? Wait inner border now is X at positions row4 col4-col5? Actually row4 col4-col5 are X X (same as previous X). Let's examine: In output, the innermost 2x2 block is X X / X X? Actually rows4-5 col4-5 are X X each. Yes innermost is X (previously third layer). So mapping: colors shift outward? Let's map layers: Input layers (outer to inner): L1: A L2: . L3: X L4: A (inner 2x2) Output layers: L1: X L2: A L3: . L4: X So it's a rotation of colors among layers: each layer takes color of the layer just outside it (i.e., shift inward). The outermost takes color of the innermost? Wait outermost got X which was L3, not innermost L4. So maybe there are only three colors repeating? The description says three gel colors repeat as you look deeper. Indeed we have three colors repeating: A, ., X, A, ., X, ... but in this case we have 4 layers, pattern A, ., X, A (repeat). S ... [12368 chars truncated]
"Concentric garden borders rotate their plantings one bed inward at season's turn"
120b: k=1
See: A rectangular garden of nested planting borders, each bed filled with one of three flower varieties that cycle as beds narrow toward the center
Do: At the turn of the season, the gardener transplants each border's flowers one ring inward — the outermost bed's blooms fill the center plot, and every other bed receives the variety that previously grew just outside it
Grid: Same rectangular garden layout, same bed structure, but each concentric border now holds a different flower variety than last season
We need to infer rule. Input is a rectangular grid with nested borders. In example, input has outer border of A, then inner border of .? Let's examine. Example input 8x8: Row1: A A A A A A A A Row2: A . . . . . . A Row3: A . X X X X . A Row4: A . X A A X . A Row5: A . X A A X . A Row6: A . X X X X . A Row7: A . . . . . . A Row8: A A A A A A A A So there are concentric layers: outermost layer (border) all A. Next layer (one cell inside) consists of . on top/bottom rows and . on left/right columns? Actually row2 col2-col7 are .; row7 col2-col7 .; column2 rows2-7 .; column7 rows2-7 . So second layer is . (black). Third layer (next inside) consists of X on top/bottom rows (row3 col3-col6 X, row6 col3-col6 X) and X on left/right columns (col3 rows3-6 X, col6 rows3-6 X). So third layer is X (grey). Fourth layer (innermost) is A in a 2x2 block at rows4-5 cols4-5 (A). So pattern: three colors cycling: A outer, . next, X next, A inner. Output grid 8x8: Row1: X X X X X X X X Row2: X A A A A A A X Row3: X A . . . . A X Row4: X A . X X . A X Row5: X A . X X . A X Row6: X A . . . . A X Row7: X A A A A A A X Row8: X X X X X X X X Now outermost layer becomes X (previously third layer). Next layer becomes A (previously outermost). Next layer becomes . (previously second). Next inner becomes X (previously third)?? Wait innermost 2x2 block becomes X? Actually output rows4-5 cols4-5 are X X (yes). In input those were A. So innermost becomes X (previously third layer). So rule: each border shifts inward by one ring, with outermost receiving the previous innermost? Let's see mapping: In input layers from outer to inner: L1=A, L2=., L3=X, L4=A (inner). Output layers: L1 becomes X (was L3), L2 becomes A (was L1), L3 becomes . (was L2), L4 becomes X (was L3). So it's like rotate layers outward? Actually each layer takes the color of the layer just outside it (one ring outward), except outermost takes color of innermost? Wait outermost took color of L3 (two steps inside). Let's think of "transplant each border's flowers one ring inward — the outermost bed's blooms fill the center plot, and every other bed receives the variety that previously grew just outside it". The description: outermost moves to center, each other moves one inward (i.e., receives from outside). So mapping: For each cell, its new color = color of cell that is one step outward (i.e., previous outer neighbor). For outermost cells, there is no outward neighbor, they get color from innermost? Actually description says outermost bed's blooms fill the center plot. So outermost moves to center (innermost). So outermost's color goes to innermost region. Meanwhile each other border receives variety that previously grew just outside it (i.e., moves inward). So effectively shift colors inward by one layer, with outermost color wrapping around to innermost. Thus transformation: For each layer index i (0 outermost), new color = color of layer i-1 (previous outer layer), with i=0 (outermost) gets color ... [11298 chars truncated]
See: The grid is divided into a 3×3 arrangement of 2×2 blocks, separated by single rows and columns of black (.) cells acting as dividers. Each 2×2 block is filled with blue (B) by default. Some blocks contain one or more non-blue colored cells at specific positions within their 2×2 area — these are 'marked' blocks. The marked blocks appear along the edges of the 3×3 arrangement (the top row, bottom row, left column, and right column of blocks). The center block and other interior-edge blocks may start as plain all-blue blocks.
Do: For each row of blocks (top, middle, bottom) and each column of blocks (left, center, right), examine the two edge blocks that bookend that row or column. If both edge blocks in a row share a non-blue color at the same position within their 2×2 block, copy that color into the corresponding position of the middle block in that row. Similarly, if both edge blocks in a column share a non-blue color at the same position within their 2×2 block, copy that color into the corresponding position of the middle block in that column. If only one edge block has a non-blue color at a given position (and the opposite edge block does not), the middle block is not affected at that position. Apply all such propagations to produce the output.
Grid: The grid is 8 columns × 8 rows. It consists of a 3×3 arrangement of 2×2 content blocks. The blocks are separated by single-cell-wide dividers filled with black (.) — specifically, rows 2 and 5 are entirely black, and columns 2 and 5 are entirely black. The 2×2 blocks occupy the remaining cells. Colors used are blue (B) as the default fill, with up to a few non-blue accent colors (such as orange, green, yellow, red, azure, magenta, maroon) appearing in marked blocks.
"Gatekeepers on opposite walls signal to the hallway guard between them."
120b: k=1
See: A walled city is laid out as a 3×3 grid of guard towers, separated by dark empty corridors. Most towers are staffed entirely by blue-uniformed soldiers. A few towers along the city walls have a special officer — someone wearing a distinctive colored sash — standing at a particular post within the tower.
Do: When two towers on opposite walls of the same street both have an officer wearing the same colored sash at the same post, the tower in the middle of that street recruits a matching officer for that post — as if the two sentries are signaling across the corridor, and the middle tower answers the call. A lone officer with no counterpart on the far wall sends no signal, and the middle tower ignores them.
Grid: The city is 8×8 cobblestones. Nine 2×2 guard towers sit in a 3×3 arrangement, divided by single-width dark corridors (rows 2 and 5, columns 2 and 5). Blue is the standard uniform. Colored sashes — orange, green, yellow, red, and others — mark the special officers.
We need to infer rule. From description: 8x8 grid with 3x3 towers each 2x2 separated by corridors rows 2 and5 (0-index?). Actually rows 0-7. Corridors are rows 2 and5, columns 2 and5 (single width). So towers are blocks: top-left rows0-1 cols0-1, top-middle rows0-1 cols3-4, top-right rows0-1 cols6-7, middle-left rows3-4 cols0-1, etc. Within each tower, most cells are blue (B). Some cells have colored sashes (non-blue). The rule: when two towers on opposite walls of same street both have an officer wearing same colored sash at same post (position within 2x2), then middle tower gets that colored sash at that same position. So we need to look at each "street": horizontal street: left and right towers (west/east) opposite each other across middle column corridor? Actually street is row corridor? Let's think: towers on opposite walls of same street: For horizontal street, towers left and right of middle column (i.e., same row block) across the vertical corridor column 2? Wait towers are arranged 3x3. Streets are rows and columns of corridors. So there are vertical corridors (columns 2 and5) separating left-middle-right towers. Horizontal corridors (rows 2 and5) separating top-middle-bottom towers. Thus for each pair of towers opposite each other across a corridor, we compare corresponding positions (relative within 2x2). If both have same non-blue color at same relative position, then the tower in middle (the one adjacent to both across the corridor) gets that color at that position. Specifically: For vertical street: left tower (col block 0-1) and right tower (col block 6-7) across middle tower (col block 3-4). If both left and right have same colored sash at same relative cell (e.g., top-left of their 2x2), then middle tower gets that color at that same relative cell. Similarly for horizontal street: top tower (rows0-1) and bottom tower (rows6-7) across middle tower (rows3-4) for each column block. Also there are diagonal? No. Now check Example1 to verify. Example1 Input grid (I'll map). Let's write towers. Rows0-1, cols0-1: top-left tower: Row0 col0 B, col1 B Row1 col0 B, col1 G (green at position (1,1) relative bottom-right) Top-middle tower rows0-1 cols3-4: Row0 col3 O (orange) at (0,0) relative? Actually within tower coordinates (0,0) top-left is col3 row0. Row0 col4 B Row1 col3 B, col4 B Top-right tower rows0-1 cols6-7: Row0 col6 B, col7 B Row1 col6 B, col7 G (green at bottom-right) Middle-left tower rows3-4 cols0-1: Rows3-4: row3 col0 B, col1 B; row4 col0 B, col1 B (all blue) Middle-middle tower rows3-4 cols3-4: row3 col3 B, col4 B; row4 col3 B, col4 B (all blue) Middle-right tower rows3-4 cols6-7: row3 col6 B, col7 B; row4 col6 B, col7 B (all blue) Bottom-left tower rows6-7 cols0-1: row6 col0 B, col1 B; row7 col0 B, col1 B (all blue) Bottom-middle tower rows6-7 cols3-4: row6 col3 O, col4 B; row7 col3 B, col4 B Bottom-right tower rows6-7 cols6-7: row6 col6 B, col7 B; row7 col6 B, col7 G Now output: they changed some cells. Ou ... [8977 chars truncated]
"Genes express only when both parents carry the trait — recessive alleles in flanking cells activate the dormant center."
120b: k=1
See: A tissue sample divided into a 3×3 grid of 2×2 cell clusters, separated by membrane walls of black (.) cells. Most clusters are homogeneous blue (B) — healthy baseline tissue. Some clusters along the outer edges carry mutations: single cells within the 2×2 cluster have changed color, representing variant alleles.
Do: For each row and column of clusters, examine the two outer clusters that flank the center one. When both flanking clusters carry the same mutation at the same position within their 2×2 structure, the gene expresses in the center cluster — that position inherits the mutant color. If only one flank carries a variant, the trait remains recessive and the center stays blue. Apply this inheritance rule across all rows and columns.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 cell clusters arranged 3×3, separated by single-cell-wide black (.) membrane rows (rows 2, 5) and columns (cols 2, 5). Blue (B) is the default healthy state. Accent colors (O, G, Y, R, A, M, W) appear as mutations in edge clusters.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: 8x8 grid with 3x3 clusters of 2x2 cells separated by black rows/cols at indices 2 and 5 (0-index?). Let's map coordinates. Input grid 8x8, with black '.' cells forming walls: rows 2 and 5 are all '.'; columns 2 and 5 are all '.'. Thus clusters are at positions: rows 0-1, 3-4, 6-7; columns 0-1, 3-4, 6-7. Each cluster is 2x2. The rule: For each row and column of clusters, examine the two outer clusters that flank the center one. When both flanking clusters carry the same mutation at the same position within their 2x2 structure, the gene expresses in the center cluster — that position inherits the mutant color. If only one flank carries a variant, the center stays blue. Thus we need to look at each line of three clusters horizontally (row of clusters) and vertically (column of clusters). For each of the four cells within the 2x2 center cluster, we check the corresponding position in the left and right clusters (for horizontal) and top and bottom clusters (for vertical). If both flanking clusters have same non-blue color at that position, then center cluster cell becomes that color. Possibly if both flanking have same color but maybe also if they are same as each other (could be blue? but default is blue). The rule says "both flanking clusters carry the same mutation at the same position". So they must be non-blue? The example: Let's analyze Example 1 to confirm. Example 1 Input grid (I'll index). Let's write clusters. Rows 0-1, cols0-1: cluster (0,0) top-left: Row0 col0 B, col1 B Row1 col0 B, col1 G So pattern: B B B G Cluster (0,1) top-middle: rows0-1, cols3-4 (since col2 is .). Values: Row0 col3 O, col4 B Row1 col3 B, col4 B Pattern: O B B B Cluster (0,2) top-right: rows0-1, cols6-7: Row0 col6 B, col7 B Row1 col6 B, col7 G Pattern: B B B G Middle row of clusters (row index 1 of clusters) rows3-4. Cluster (1,0): rows3-4, cols0-1: Row3 B B Row4 B B Pattern all B. Cluster (1,1): rows3-4, cols3-4: Row3 B B Row4 B B All B. Cluster (1,2): rows3-4, cols6-7: Row3 B B Row4 B B All B. Bottom row of clusters (2,0): rows6-7, cols0-1: Row6 B B Row7 B B All B. Cluster (2,1): rows6-7, cols3-4: Row6 O B Row7 B B Pattern: O B B B Cluster (2,2): rows6-7, cols6-7: Row6 B B Row7 B G Pattern: B B B G Now output grid: Let's see changes. Output rows0-1 same as input except some changes? Row0 unchanged. Row1: originally "B G . B B . B G". Output row1: "B G . B G . B G". So at position (row1,col4) changed from B to G. That's within cluster (0,1) top-middle, cell (row1 relative index 1, col4 relative index 1) i.e., bottom-right cell of that 2x2 cluster. In input, that cell was B. In output, becomes G. Why? Look at horizontal row of clusters: left cluster (0,0) and right cluster (0,2) flanking (0,1). At same position (bottom-right) of each flanking cluster: (0,0) bottom-right is G (since pattern B G). (0,2) bottom-right is G (since pattern B G). Both are G, same mutation. So center cluster gets G at ... [8893 chars truncated]
"Binary stars on opposite edges of a constellation align their light on the void between them — a lone star's radiance fades before reaching the center."
120b: fail
See: A star chart divided into a 3×3 grid of 2×2 celestial quadrants, separated by black (.) dark-matter lanes. Most quadrants glow steady blue (B). Some quadrants at the chart's edges contain a distinctly colored star at a particular position within the quadrant.
Do: For each row and column, compare the two edge quadrants. Where both hold the same colored star at the same internal position, their combined light illuminates the center quadrant at that position with their shared color. A star with no matching counterpart opposite it cannot reach the center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 quadrants in 3×3 layout. Black (.) dark lanes at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) ambient glow. Colored stars in edge quadrants.
We need to understand rule. From description: 8x8 grid with 3x3 layout of 2x2 quadrants separated by black lanes rows 2,5 and cols 2,5 (0-index?). Actually grid 8x8, with black '.' lines at rows 2 and 5 (0-indexed rows 2 and 5) and columns 2 and 5. That creates nine 2x2 quadrants: positions (0-1,0-1) top-left, (0-1,3-4) top-center, (0-1,6-7) top-right, etc. Edge quadrants are those on outer border: top-left, top-center, top-right, middle-left, middle-right, bottom-left, bottom-center, bottom-right. Center quadrant is middle (rows 3-4, cols 3-4). The rule: For each row and column, compare the two edge quadrants. Where both hold the same colored star at the same internal position, their combined light illuminates the center quadrant at that position with their shared color. So we need to look at opposite edge quadrants across the center: left vs right for same row of quadrants, and top vs bottom for same column of quadrants. For each of the four positions within a quadrant (2x2), if both opposite quadrants have same non-blue colored star at same internal position, then set that position in center quadrant to that color. If not, center remains unchanged (presumably stays blue B). Also maybe if multiple matches, they all apply. Check Example 1 to verify. Let's parse Example1 input and output. I'll label quadrants coordinates. Use rows 0-7, cols 0-7. Rows 0-1 top band, rows 2 black lane, rows 3-4 middle band, row5 black lane, rows6-7 bottom band. Columns similarly. Now extract quadrants: Top-left (TL): rows0-1, cols0-1: Row0 col0 B, col1 B Row1 col0 B, col1 G So TL has a G at internal position (row1,col0) relative to quadrant (i.e., bottom-left cell). Others B. Top-center (TC): rows0-1, cols3-4 (since col2 is black lane). Row0 col3 O, col4 B. Row1 col3 B, col4 B. So O at top-left of that quadrant (relative position (0,0)). Good. Top-right (TR): rows0-1, cols6-7. Row0 col6 B, col7 B. Row1 col6 B, col7 G. So G at bottom-right (relative (1,1)). Middle-left (ML): rows3-4, cols0-1. Row3 B B, Row4 B B. All B. Middle-center (MC) is center quadrant rows3-4, cols3-4. Input: Row3 col3 B, col4 B. Row4 col3 B, col4 B. All B. Middle-right (MR): rows3-4, cols6-7. Row3 B B, Row4 B G. So G at bottom-right (1,1) of MR. Bottom-left (BL): rows6-7, cols0-1. Row6 B B, Row7 B B. All B. Bottom-center (BC): rows6-7, cols3-4. Row6 O B, Row7 B B. So O at top-left (0,0) of BC. Bottom-right (BR): rows6-7, cols6-7. Row6 B B, Row7 B G. So G at bottom-right (1,1) of BR. Now rule: compare opposite edge quadrants for each row and column. Rows: For top row of quadrants (TL vs TR) compare same internal positions. TL has G at (1,0). TR has G at (1,1). Not same position, so no match. TL has no other colored star besides G. TR only G at (1,1). So no matches. Middle row of quadrants (ML vs MR): ML all B, MR has G at (1,1). No match. Bottom row (BL vs BR): BL all B, BR G at (1,1). No match. Columns: left column (TL vs BL): TL G at (1,0). BL none. No match. Center column ... [11364 chars truncated]
"When matching signal flags fly from ships on opposite shores, the harbor vessel between them hoists the same colors — a lone ship's pennant is just decoration on the horizon."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nautical chart with a 3×3 formation of 2×2 berths, separated by black (.) channel markers. Most berths are calm blue (B) water. Some berths along the outer shores fly a colored signal flag at a specific mast position within the berth.
Do: For each row and column of berths, check the two shore berths at opposite ends. When both fly the same signal color at the same mast position, the harbor berth between them hoists that flag at the matching position. A flag flying from only one shore goes unacknowledged by the center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 berths in 3×3 layout. Black (.) channels at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) water. Signal colors in shore berths.
"A logic gate in the center only fires when it receives the same voltage on both input pins from opposite ends of the bus — a signal on one pin alone doesn't meet the threshold."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A circuit board with a 3×3 array of 2×2 component pads, separated by black (.) insulating traces. Most pads carry blue (B) — ground level. Some pads on the board's periphery have an active signal (colored cell) at a specific pin position.
Do: For each row and column, check the two peripheral pads. When both carry the same signal color at the same pin position, the AND-gate condition is met and the center pad activates at that pin with the matching color. A signal present on only one side fails the gate and the center stays at ground.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 pads in 3×3 layout. Black (.) insulation at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) ground. Signal colors at pin positions on edge pads.
"Twin guardian spirits stationed at opposite thresholds awaken the sleeping idol between them — a solitary spirit lacks the power to rouse the center shrine alone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A temple floor plan: a 3×3 grid of 2×2 shrine chambers, separated by black (.) sacred passages. Most chambers contain blue (B) dormant energy. Some chambers along the outer thresholds house a colored spirit at a specific altar position.
Do: For each row and column of chambers, examine the two threshold chambers at opposite ends. When both harbor the same spirit color at the same altar position, the dormant center chamber awakens at that position with the spirit's color. A spirit with no twin at the opposing threshold cannot breach the center's slumber.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 chambers in 3×3 layout. Black (.) passages at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) dormant. Spirit colors in threshold chambers.
"Partners mirroring the same step from opposite wings cue the center dancer to join in — a solo flourish from one side is admired but not repeated."
120b: k=2
See: A dance floor divided into a 3×3 formation of 2×2 performance squares, separated by black (.) resting strips. Most squares show blue (B) — dancers at rest. Some squares in the outer wings feature a dancer performing a colored step at a specific position.
Do: For each row and column, compare the two wing squares at opposite ends. When both feature the same colored step at the same position, the center square's dancer mirrors that step at the corresponding position. A step performed from only one wing goes unmatched and the center dancer stays at rest.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 squares in 3×3 layout. Black (.) resting strips at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) rest position. Step colors in wing squares.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: 8x8 grid, with black strips at rows 2,5 and cols 2,5? Actually rows indexed starting 0? In examples, there are black '.' cells forming lines separating 2x2 squares. Let's examine example 1 input. I'll write grid coordinates. 8x8. Row0: B B . O B . B B Row1: B G . B B . B G Row2: . . . . . . . . Row3: B B . B B . B B Row4: B B . B B . B B Row5: . . . . . . . . Row6: B B . O B . B B Row7: B B . B B . B G We see black '.' at column2 and column5 (0-index). Also rows2 and5 are all '.'. Thus the grid is divided into nine 2x2 blocks: top-left block rows0-1 cols0-1, top-middle rows0-1 cols3-4, top-right rows0-1 cols6-7, middle-left rows3-4 cols0-1, middle block rows3-4 cols3-4, middle-right rows3-4 cols6-7, bottom-left rows6-7 cols0-1, bottom-middle rows6-7 cols3-4, bottom-right rows6-7 cols6-7. The "wing squares" are outer squares? The description: For each row and column, compare the two wing squares at opposite ends. When both feature the same colored step at the same position, the center square's dancer mirrors that step at the corresponding position. A step performed from only one wing goes unmatched and the center dancer stays at rest. Interpretation: For each of the three rows of squares (top, middle, bottom), we have left wing square (leftmost block) and right wing square (rightmost block). Similarly for each of three columns of squares (left, middle, right), we have top wing square (top block) and bottom wing square (bottom block). The center square is the middle block (row 2, col 2 of blocks). The rule: For each position within the 2x2 block (i.e., each of the four cells), if the left and right wing squares have the same color at that same relative position, then the center block gets that color at that position. Otherwise remains B (blue) (rest). Similarly for column wise? Wait we need to consider both row and column comparisons? The description says "For each row and column, compare the two wing squares at opposite ends. When both feature the same colored step at the same position, the center square's dancer mirrors that step at the corresponding position." So we need to consider both horizontal (row) and vertical (column) comparisons, and maybe combine? Let's test with example 1. We need to compute output grid. Let's see differences between input and output. Example1 output row0 same as input. Row1 changed: input row1: B G . B B . B G ; output row1: B G . B G . B G . So only change is at column4 (index4) changed from B to G. That's the top-middle block (rows0-1, cols3-4). The position (row1,col4) corresponds to lower-left cell of that 2x2 block? Let's map block coordinates: top-middle block rows0-1, cols3-4. Its four cells: (0,3) (0,4) top row; (1,3) (1,4) bottom row. Input values: (0,3)=O, (0,4)=B, (1,3)=B, (1,4)=B. Output: (0,3)=O unchanged, (0,4)=B unchanged, (1,3)=G changed from B to G, (1,4)=G changed from B to G? Wait output row1 col3 is G? Actually row1 col3 is column index3? ... [9356 chars truncated]
"Matching mineral veins running in from opposite edges of the formation crystallize in the chamber between them — an isolated vein terminates before reaching the core."
120b: fail
See: A cross-section of rock: a 3×3 grid of 2×2 mineral chambers, separated by black (.) fault lines. Most chambers are filled with blue (B) base rock. Some chambers along the formation's edges contain a colored mineral deposit at a specific position within the chamber.
Do: For each row and column of chambers, examine the two edge chambers. When both contain the same mineral color at the same internal position, the mineral crystallizes in the center chamber at that position. A mineral vein present on only one edge peters out before reaching the center and has no effect.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 chambers in 3×3 layout. Black (.) fault lines at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) base rock. Mineral colors in edge chambers.
We need to understand rule. From description: 8x8 grid with 3x3 chambers each 2x2 separated by black lines rows 2,5 and cols 2,5 (0-index?). Actually grid indices 0-7. Black lines at rows 2 and 5 (third and sixth rows) and columns 2 and 5. So chambers are 2x2 blocks at positions: top-left block rows0-1 cols0-1, top-middle rows0-1 cols3-4, top-right rows0-1 cols6-7, middle-left rows3-4 cols0-1, middle rows3-4 cols3-4, middle-right rows3-4 cols6-7, bottom-left rows6-7 cols0-1, bottom-middle rows6-7 cols3-4, bottom-right rows6-7 cols6-7. Edge chambers are those on outer perimeter of 3x3 layout: i.e., chambers that are on outer rows or columns: top row (three chambers), bottom row, left column, right column. Center chamber is middle one (rows3-4 cols3-4). Rule: For each row and column of chambers, examine the two edge chambers. When both contain the same mineral color at the same internal position, the mineral crystallizes in the center chamber at that position. So we look at each line (row of chambers) i.e., top row: left and right chambers (since middle is center? Actually row of chambers includes three chambers: left, middle, right. Edge chambers are left and right. If they have same color at same internal position (i.e., within their 2x2 block, same relative cell), then that color appears in the center chamber at that same position. Similarly for each column of chambers: top and bottom chambers (edge) compare; if same color at same internal position, set that position in center chamber. Also maybe both row and column can affect same cell; maybe they combine? In example 1 we can test. Let's parse example1 input and output to deduce. Example1 Input grid (8x8). Let's write rows: 1: B B . O B . B B 2: B G . B B . B G 3: . . . . . . . . 4: B B . B B . B B 5: B B . B B . B B 6: . . . . . . . . 7: B B . O B . B B 8: B B . B B . B G Output grid differs in some cells: compare. Row2 output: B G . B G . B G (changed at column5? Actually columns: 1 B,2 G,3 .,4 B,5 G,6 .,7 B,8 G. Input row2 column5 was B, changed to G. So center chamber got G at position? Let's map chambers. Indices (1-based). Black columns at 3 and 6? Actually column3 is '.'? Wait column3 is '.' in all rows? Input row1 col3 '.' yes black line. column6 '.' also black line. So chambers columns: 1-2 left, 4-5 middle, 7-8 right. Similarly rows: row3 and row6 are black lines. Thus center chamber is rows4-5 cols4-5 (since middle block). Let's extract center chamber values from input: Rows4-5, cols4-5: Row4 col4 B, col5 B Row5 col4 B, col5 B All B (blue). Output rows4-5 same? Row4 output: B B . O B . B B (unchanged). Row5 output same. So center chamber unchanged? Wait but rule says mineral may appear in center chamber (the middle chamber). In example1, output shows changes in row2 column5 (which is in top-middle chamber? Actually row2 is within top row of chambers (rows1-2). Row2 col5 is within top-middle chamber (rows1-2, cols4-5). That's not center chamber. Hmm maybe I misinterpret: ... [9385 chars truncated]
"Two matching spices on opposite ends of the counter infuse the dish sitting between them — a lone spice jar flavors nothing but itself."
120b: k=1
See: A kitchen counter divided into a 3×3 arrangement of 2×2 cutting boards, with black (.) cleaning strips between them. Most boards hold plain blue (B) ingredients. Some outer boards have a dash of color — a spice accent at a particular corner of the board.
Do: Look across each row and down each column of boards. When two outer boards share the same spice color in the same corner position, their flavor diffuses into the center board at that same corner. A single unmatched spice stays put and doesn't spread. Infuse all matching pairs simultaneously.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 boards in a 3×3 layout, separated by black (.) strips at rows 2, 5 and columns 2, 5. Blue (B) is the base ingredient. Spice colors (O, G, Y, R, etc.) appear at specific positions within edge boards.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's parse grid layout. 8x8 with separators at rows 2,5 and columns 2,5 (0-index?). Actually 8 rows, columns 0-7. The pattern: 2x2 boards separated by a column of '.' at col 2 and 5, and row of '.' at row 2 and 5. So there are 3 boards per row/col: top-left board rows0-1 cols0-1, top-middle rows0-1 cols3-4, top-right rows0-1 cols6-7, middle-left rows3-4 cols0-1, etc. In example1 input: Let's map boards. I'll write coordinates. Rows0-1, cols0-1: Row0: B B Row1: B G So board TL has B B / B G. Contains a G at bottom-left corner? Actually positions within board: (0,0) top-left, (0,1) top-right, (1,0) bottom-left, (1,1) bottom-right. So G at (1,0) bottom-left corner. Top-middle board rows0-1 cols3-4: Row0 col3 O, col4 B Row1 col3 B, col4 B So O at top-left corner of that board. Top-right board rows0-1 cols6-7: Row0 B B Row1 B G So G at bottom-right? Wait positions: col6 B, col7 B top row; row1 col6 B, col7 G => G at bottom-right corner. Middle-left board rows3-4 cols0-1: Rows3: B B Row4: B B All B. Middle board rows3-4 cols3-4: Rows3: B B Row4: B B Middle-right board rows3-4 cols6-7: Rows3: B B Row4: B B Bottom-left board rows6-7 cols0-1: Rows6: B B Row7: B B Bottom-middle board rows6-7 cols3-4: Rows6: O B Row7: B B So O at top-left corner again. Bottom-right board rows6-7 cols6-7: Rows6: B B Row7: B G G at bottom-right. Now output: Let's compare changes. Output rows0-1 same as input except row1 col4 changed? Actually output row1: "B G . B G . B G". Wait row1 originally "B G . B B . B G". So at column4 (index4) changed from B to G. That's within top-middle board at position (row1, col4) which is bottom-right corner of that board? Let's see board top-middle coordinates: rows0-1, cols3-4. Positions: (0,3) top-left O, (0,4) top-right B, (1,3) bottom-left B, (1,4) bottom-right B originally. Output changed (1,4) to G. So G diffused into that corner. Which G? There is a G at top-right board bottom-right corner (row1,col7). Also G at bottom-right board bottom-right (row7,col7). Also G at top-left board bottom-left (row1,col0). The rule: "When two outer boards share the same spice color in the same corner position, their flavor diffuses into the center board at that same corner." So we need to consider pairs of outer boards (i.e., boards on the perimeter) that are opposite each other across the center board? For each corner position (relative within board) that matches same color in two outer boards, the center board gets that color at its corresponding corner. The center board is the middle board (rows3-4, cols3-4). In output, we see changes in center board? Let's check output rows3-4: they remain all B except maybe some changes? Output rows3: "B B . O B . B B" Wait row3 originally "B B . B B . B B". Output row3 col3 changed to O? Actually row3 col3 is column index3 (first column of middle board). Row3 col3 originally B, now O. Row3 col4 originally B, unchanged? Row3 col5 is '.' separator. Row3 col6 B ... [10692 chars truncated]
"When the first and last chairs in a section play the same accidental, the principal in the middle picks it up — a solo accent goes unechoed."
120b: fig alone solves
See: An orchestra seating chart: a 3×3 arrangement of 2×2 musician pods separated by black (.) aisle strips. Most seats are blue (B) — playing the standard part. Some pods along the outer sections have a colored note: a musician playing an accidental (non-blue) at a specific seat position.
Do: For each row and column of pods, check whether the two end-section pods share the same accidental at the same chair position. If they do, the middle pod's corresponding chair adopts that accidental. Unmatched accidentals remain isolated solos. Resolve all sections.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 pods in 3×3 layout. Black (.) aisles at rows 2, 5 and columns 2, 5. Blue (B) default. Accent colors at specific positions in outer pods.
"A play only reaches midfield when both sideline coaches flash the same signal — a lone flag is just noise in the stands."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A playing field partitioned into a 3×3 formation of 2×2 player zones, with black (.) boundary lines between them. Zones are mostly blue (B) — neutral players. Some zones along the edges carry a colored signal flag at a particular position within the zone.
Do: Scan each row and each column of zones. When both edge zones in a line display the same colored flag at the same internal position, the midfield zone between them raises that flag at the matching position. A flag with no matching counterpart on the opposite side has no effect on the center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 zones in 3×3 layout. Black (.) lines at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) baseline. Signal colors in edge zones.
"When identical pressure fronts converge from opposite horizons, the calm eye between them takes on their character — a lone front dissipates before reaching center."
120b: fail
See: A weather map divided into a 3×3 array of 2×2 atmospheric cells, separated by black (.) calm bands. Most cells are uniform blue (B) — stable air. Some peripheral cells carry a colored disturbance at a specific position within the cell.
Do: Along each row and column, compare the two outermost cells. Where both carry the same disturbance color at the same position, the intervening center cell develops that disturbance at the corresponding position. A disturbance appearing on only one side fails to propagate and the center remains stable.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 cells in 3×3 pattern. Black (.) bands at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) default. Weather colors at positions in edge cells.
We need to understand rule. From description: 8x8 grid with 3x3 array of 2x2 cells separated by black rows/cols at indices 2 and 5 (0-index?). Let's map coordinates. Grid 8x8, rows 0-7, cols 0-7. Black rows at 2 and 5 (full row of .). Black columns at 2 and 5. So cells are 2x2 blocks at positions: top-left cell rows 0-1 cols 0-1, top-middle rows0-1 cols3-4, top-right rows0-1 cols6-7, middle-left rows3-4 cols0-1, middle rows3-4 cols3-4, middle-right rows3-4 cols6-7, bottom-left rows6-7 cols0-1, bottom-middle rows6-7 cols3-4, bottom-right rows6-7 cols6-7. Each cell may be uniform blue (B) or have a colored disturbance at a specific position within the cell. The disturbance is a non-B color placed in one of the four positions of the 2x2 cell. In examples, we see O at top-left? Let's examine Example1 input and output. Example1 Input grid lines: Row0: B B . O B . B B Row1: B G . B B . B G Row2: . . . . . . . . Row3: B B . B B . B B Row4: B B . B B . B B Row5: . . . . . . . . Row6: B B . O B . B B Row7: B B . B B . B G Let's map cells. Cell (0,0) rows0-1 cols0-1: [B B; B G] => top-left cell has G at position (row1,col1) i.e., bottom-right of cell? Actually cell coordinates: positions: (0,0) top-left, (0,1) top-right, (1,0) bottom-left, (1,1) bottom-right. Here we have B at (0,0), B at (0,1), B at (1,0), G at (1,1). So disturbance G at bottom-right. Cell (0,1) rows0-1 cols3-4: row0 col3 O, col4 B; row1 col3 B, col4 B. So O at top-left of that cell. Cell (0,2) rows0-1 cols6-7: row0 col6 B, col7 B; row1 col6 B, col7 G. So G at bottom-right. Middle row cells (row3-4). Cell (1,0) rows3-4 cols0-1: both rows B B; B B => all B (no disturbance). Cell (1,1) rows3-4 cols3-4: all B. Cell (1,2) rows3-4 cols6-7: all B. Bottom row cells rows6-7. Cell (2,0) rows6-7 cols0-1: row6 B B; row7 B B => all B. Cell (2,1) rows6-7 cols3-4: row6 O B; row7 B B => O at top-left. Cell (2,2) rows6-7 cols6-7: row6 B B; row7 B G => G at bottom-right. Now output grid: Row0 same as input. Row1: B G . B G . B G (changed). Let's see changes: previously row1 col4 was B, now G at col4? Actually row1 col4 is column index 4 (since col0 B,1 G,2 .,3 B,4 ?,5 .,6 B,7 G). Output row1: B G . B G . B G. So at col4 now G (was B). Also col3 remains B. So the top-middle cell (0,1) got G at position (row1,col4) which is bottom-right of that cell. Indeed earlier top-middle cell had O at top-left. Now after transformation, it gets G at bottom-right because both outer cells (top-left and top-right?) Wait rule: Along each row and column, compare the two outermost cells. Where both carry same disturbance color at same position, the intervening center cell develops that disturbance at corresponding position. We need to consider rows of cells: For each row of three cells (left, center, right). Compare leftmost and rightmost cells. If they have same colored disturbance (same color) and at same relative position within their 2x2 cell, then the middle cell gets that disturbance at sa ... [8883 chars truncated]
"Twin gargoyles on opposing towers cast their likeness onto the courtyard facade between them — a solitary ornament adorns only its own wall."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A building facade with a 3×3 grid of 2×2 window bays, separated by black (.) structural columns and beams. Most bays are plain blue (B) glass. Some bays on the outer walls feature a colored ornament at a specific pane position.
Do: For each row and column of bays, examine the two bays at opposite ends. When both bear the same ornamental color at the same pane position, the central bay between them receives a matching ornament at that position. An ornament without a twin across the way leaves the center unchanged.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 bays in 3×3 arrangement. Black (.) structural elements at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) plain glass. Ornament colors in outer bays.
"Crossfire requires two flanking positions — when sentries on opposite borders share the same banner color and stance, the no-man's-land between them falls under their combined influence."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A battlefield map: a 3×3 grid of 2×2 outposts separated by black (.) trenches. Most outpost positions fly blue (B) — neutral flags. Some outposts on the perimeter have a colored banner at a specific position within their 2×2 footprint.
Do: Along each row and column of outposts, check whether the two perimeter outposts display the same colored banner at the same internal position. If so, the central outpost between them is claimed: that position adopts the banner color. A banner with no matching opposite has no reach into the center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 outposts, 3×3 layout. Black (.) trenches at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) neutral. Banner colors in perimeter outposts.
"When the same character appears in the wings on both sides of the stage, a phantom of that character materializes center stage — a lone understudy waits in the wings unseen."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stage divided into a 3×3 arrangement of 2×2 spotlight zones, separated by black (.) curtain gaps. Most zones are lit blue (B) — empty stage light. Some wing zones (outer edges) have a costumed character (colored cell) at a specific spotlight position.
Do: For each row and column of zones, look at the two wing zones on opposite sides. When both wings have the same character color at the same spotlight position, the center-stage zone gains that character at the corresponding position. Characters appearing in only one wing remain offstage and don't manifest center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 zones in 3×3 stage layout. Black (.) curtains at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) stage lighting. Character colors in wing zones.
"Cross-pollination requires matching flowers on both borders of the garden row — pollen from a lone bloom has nothing to fertilize in the center bed."
120b: fail
See: A garden plot arranged as a 3×3 grid of 2×2 planting beds, separated by black (.) stone paths. Most beds are filled with blue (B) ground cover. Some beds along the garden borders have a colored bloom at a specific planting position.
Do: For each row and column of beds, examine the two border beds. When both carry the same colored bloom at the same planting position, cross-pollination succeeds and the center bed sprouts that color at the matching spot. A bloom with no matching partner across the row or column pollinates nothing in the center.
Grid: 8×8 grid. Nine 2×2 beds in 3×3 layout. Black (.) paths at rows 2, 5 and cols 2, 5. Blue (B) ground cover. Bloom colors in border beds.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: 8x8 grid, with 3x3 layout of 2x2 beds separated by black rows/cols at indices 2 and 5 (0-index?). Actually grid shown: 8 columns, rows. The pattern: rows 0-1 are first band, row2 is black line, rows3-4 second band, row5 black line, rows6-7 third band. Similarly columns 0-1 first band, col2 black line, col3-4 second band, col5 black line, col6-7 third band. So each 2x2 block is a "bed". The border beds are those on outer edges of the 3x3 arrangement: top row of beds (positions (0,0),(0,1),(0,2)), bottom row, left column, right column. The center bed is the middle block (row block 1, col block 1) i.e., rows 3-4, cols 3-4. The rule: For each row and column of beds, examine the two border beds. When both carry the same colored bloom at the same planting position, cross-pollination succeeds and the center bed sprouts that color at the matching spot. A bloom with no matching partner across the row or column pollinates nothing in the center. Interpretation: For each of the 4 directions? Actually each row of beds (top row and bottom row) have two border beds? Wait row of beds: there are three beds per row (left, center, right). The border beds are left and right. For each row (top, middle, bottom) we compare the left and right border beds. If they have same colored bloom at same position within the 2x2 block, then the center bed (the middle bed of that row) gets that color at that position. Similarly for each column of beds (left column, middle column, right column) compare top and bottom border beds; if they match, the center column's middle bed gets that color at that position. Thus the center bed (the middle 2x2 block) can receive colors from both row and column matches. If both row and column produce same position maybe same color? Could be overlapping but likely consistent. In examples, we can verify. Example1 Input and Output: Let's parse. Input grid (8x8). Let's label coordinates. I'll write the 2x2 blocks: Top-left block (rows0-1, cols0-1): B B / B G (since row0 col0 B, col1 B; row1 col0 B, col1 G). So top-left has a G at position (row1,col1) within block (i.e., bottom-right cell of block). Top-middle block (rows0-1, cols3-4): O B / B B? Wait row0 col3 O, col4 B; row1 col3 B, col4 B. So O at top-left of that block. Top-right block (rows0-1, cols6-7): B B / B G (row0 col6 B, col7 B; row1 col6 B, col7 G). So G at bottom-right. Middle row of blocks: rows3-4. Middle-left block (rows3-4, cols0-1): B B / B B (all B). Middle block (center) rows3-4, cols3-4: B B / B B (all B). Middle-right block rows3-4, cols6-7: B B / B B (all B). Bottom row of blocks: rows6-7. Bottom-left block rows6-7, cols0-1: B B / B B (all B). Bottom-middle block rows6-7, cols3-4: O B / B B (same as top-middle). Bottom-right block rows6-7, cols6-7: B B / B G (same as top-right). Now output: Let's see changes. Output grid shows modifications: In top row of blocks, the middle block (top-middle) now has a G at position ( ... [11483 chars truncated]
See: The input is a small grid of N rows by M columns containing a pattern made of one color and black (background) cells. The grid functions as a single tile or motif.
Do: Tile the input grid to fill a larger output grid by repeating it M times horizontally and N times vertically. That is, place copies of the input side by side to form a row of M tiles, then stack N such rows on top of each other. The result is an (N×N) by (M×M) output grid where the input pattern repeats seamlessly in both directions.
Grid: The input grid has dimensions N rows by M columns. The output grid has dimensions (N×N) rows by (M×M) columns. The number of horizontal repetitions equals M (the column count of the input) and the number of vertical repetitions equals N (the row count of the input). Colors are preserved exactly; no cells change color.
"A fabric swatch dreams of becoming the whole bolt of cloth."
120b: k=1
See: A small swatch of fabric displays a motif woven from a single dye color against an undyed background. This fragment remembers the dimensions of the loom it was cut from.
Do: The swatch is placed on the loom and allowed to replicate itself — it knows how many times to repeat across the warp by counting its own columns, and how many times to stack along the weft by counting its own rows. The pattern propagates like a crystal growing from a seed, each copy seamlessly kissing its neighbor at the edges until the bolt is complete.
Grid: The seed swatch carries its own multiplication instructions in its shape. A wider swatch stretches further across; a taller swatch grows further down. The dye never bleeds or shifts — every copy is a perfect echo of the original.
We need to infer rule. Input is a small pattern; output is larger tiled pattern replicating based on its dimensions. In example 1, input grid size? Let's parse. Example 1 Input (3 rows, 3 columns): Row1: . . A Row2: A A A Row3: A . . Output appears 9x9? Let's see: Output rows count: they show 9 rows, each with 9 entries (space separated). Indeed output is 9x9. So they tiled the 3x3 pattern 3 times across and 3 times down (i.e., repeat both dimensions). But not simple repetition; pattern seems interleaved? Let's examine output first row: ". . A . . A . . A". That's three copies of row1 concatenated horizontally. Row2: "A A A A A A A A A" = three copies of row2. Row3: "A . . A . . A . ." = three copies of row3. So first three rows correspond to first copy row1-3. Then rows 4-6 repeat same three rows again? Let's see row4: ". . A . . A . . A" same as row1. Row5: "A A A A A A A A A" same as row2. Row6: "A . . A . . A . ." same as row3. Row7-9 repeat again. So output is just tiling the input pattern 3x3 times (both dimensions). So rule: replicate input pattern across both axes as many times as its own size (i.e., repeat N times where N = number of rows = number of columns? Actually input is square? In example, 3x3, repeated 3 times each direction, resulting size = 3*3 =9. So repeat count equals dimension size (rows count). If non-square? Might be repeat rows count times vertically and columns count times horizontally. So output dimensions = rows*rows by cols*cols? But if rows != cols, maybe repeat rows times vertically and columns times horizontally. Let's test with test input: size? Provided test input grid: appears 5 rows, each 5 columns? Let's list: Row1: . A A . . Row2: A A A A A Row3: . A A . . Row4: A A A A A Row5: . A A . A That's 5x5. So we would repeat 5 times horizontally and vertically, resulting 25x25 grid. That's huge. But maybe they expect that. In ARC tasks, output often is larger but manageable. 25x25 is okay. Thus output will be each input row repeated 5 times horizontally to make a long row, and then that block repeated 5 times vertically. So we need to produce 25 rows each of 25 characters. Let's compute. First, define input rows as strings of characters (with spaces). We'll produce concatenated horizontally 5 times. Row1 pattern: ". A A . ." Concatenate 5 times: ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ."? Wait need to ensure spaces between cells. Actually each row is sequence of 5 cells. Repeating 5 times yields 25 cells: pattern repeated. Let's write row1 repeated 5 times: Sequence of 5 cells: [.,A,A,.,.] Repeat 5 times: indices 1-25. Let's write as characters separated by spaces. I'll produce row1_out = ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." Count: each repeat adds 5 cells, total 25. Let's count groups: we have 5 repeats, each ". A A . ." So row1_out = ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." Now row2 input: "A A A A A" (all A). Repeating 5 times yields ... [2484 chars truncated]
"A single cell carries the blueprint of the whole organism. Watch it undergo mitosis — not just once, but enough times that its own proportions dictate the size of the colony."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A living cell — a small organism whose colored parts are organelles and whose dark parts are cytoplasm.
Do: The cell divides and multiplies, spreading copies of itself outward. Its height determines how many generations stack vertically; its width determines how many sisters line up side by side.
Grid: The output is a colony of identical cells arranged in a seamless rectangular sheet. Every organelle and every void is faithfully copied in each daughter cell.
"A constellation is glimpsed through a small telescope aperture. Pull back, and the universe reveals that pattern repeating like a crystalline lattice — the aperture's own shape governing the cosmic tiling."
120b: k=1
See: A small patch of sky: colored stars against the dark void.
Do: Zoom out to reveal the cosmic lattice: the patch repeats across the sky as many times as it is wide, and down as many times as it is tall.
Grid: The full sky map is an infinite-seeming mosaic of the original star pattern, each copy abutting its neighbors with no gaps.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input 3x3? Actually input grid: Row1: . . A Row2: A A A Row3: A . . That's 3x3. Output is 9x9? Let's see output rows count: they show 9 rows each with 9 entries. So output is 3 times larger in both dimensions (scale factor = input size?). Input size = 3, output size = 9 = 3*3. So rule: tile the input pattern both horizontally and vertically as many times as its width and height respectively. That matches metaphor: repeat across sky as many times as it is wide, and down as many times as it is tall. So output is a repetition of the input pattern tiled width times horizontally and height times vertically. So output dimension = width*width? Wait width=3, height=3, output width = 3*3 =9, height = 3*3 =9. So tile count = width times horizontally and height times vertically. So each tile is the original input pattern. So output is a grid where each block of size input dimensions is the original input. Thus for test input, we need to tile it width times horizontally (width = number of columns) and height times vertically (height = number of rows). Let's compute. Test Input grid given: Rows: 1: . A A . . 2: A A A A A 3: . A A . . 4: A A A A A 5: . A A . A So it's 5 rows, 5 columns (since each row has 5 entries). So width=5, height=5. Output will be 5*5 =25 rows and 25 columns, tiled 5x5 copies of the original 5x5 pattern. Thus output is a 25x25 grid where each 5x5 block corresponds to the input pattern. We need to produce the full 25x25 grid. Let's label input pattern P[i][j] for i=0..4, j=0..4. Rows (0-index): 0: . A A . . 1: A A A A A 2: . A ... wait row2: . A A . . (same as row0) 3: A A A A A (same as row1) 4: . A A . A Let's write them as strings: Row0: . A A . . Row1: A A A A A Row2: . A A . . Row3: A A A A A Row4: . A A . A Now output grid O of size 25x25 where O[ i*5 + r ][ j*5 + c ] = P[r][c] for tile at (i,j) where i=0..4, j=0..4. Thus we can construct by repeating rows. Essentially each output row is formed by concatenating 5 copies of a particular input row, but the row index cycles every 5 rows. Specifically, for output row index R (0..24), let r = R mod 5 (the row within tile). Then the output row is the input row r repeated 5 times horizontally. Thus we can produce 5 groups of 5 rows each (tiles vertically). Each group corresponds to a particular r (0..4) repeated across vertical tiles? Wait vertical tiling means we repeat the whole pattern vertically, not just rows. So the first 5 rows of output correspond to tile row i=0 (topmost tile). Within those 5 rows, each row is the input row repeated horizontally 5 times. Then rows 5-9 correspond to tile row i=1 (second tile down), which is again the same pattern of 5 rows (the whole input) repeated horizontally. So essentially the output is just the input pattern repeated both horizontally and vertically, which yields a grid where each row is the input row repeated 5 times, and the sequence of rows repeats the input rows 5 times. Thus we can p ... [3276 chars truncated]
"A cartographer charts one square of ocean with its islands and depths. The admiralty then tiles the chart to fill the entire navigation table — the chart's own grid lines deciding the mosaic."
120b: k=1
See: A single nautical chart tile: colored shallows and islands against deep dark water.
Do: Tile the chart across the navigation table: lay as many copies across as the chart has longitude lines, and stack as many down as it has latitude lines.
Grid: The navigation table displays a seamless patchwork of identical charts, every island and depth marking recurring in perfect periodicity.
We need to infer rule. Input is a small grid, output is larger tiled pattern. Description: "Tile the chart across the navigation table: lay as many copies across as the chart has longitude lines, and stack as many down as it has latitude lines." So output is repeating the input pattern both horizontally and vertically, number of repeats equal to dimensions? Example 1: Input grid size? Let's parse. Example 1 Input: Row1: ". . A" Row2: "A A A" Row3: "A . ." So 3x3 grid. Output shown is 9x9? Let's count rows: they list many rows. Let's count rows: 1 ". . A . . A . . A" 2 "A A A A A A A A A" 3 "A . . A . . A . ." 4 ". . A . . A . . A" 5 "A A A A A A A A A" 6 "A . . A . . A . ." 7 ". . A . . A . . A" 8 "A A A A A A A A A" 9 "A . . A . . A . ." That's 9 rows, each 9 columns. So they tiled the 3x3 pattern 3 times across and 3 times down (i.e., repeat count equals size dimension). So output = input tiled both dimensions equal to its own size (i.e., repeat N times where N = number of rows = number of columns). So for a square input, repeat N times each direction, resulting in N^2 size. But test input may not be square? Let's see test input: Provided after example: "Test Input:" with 5 rows? Let's parse: Row1: ". A A . ." Row2: "A A A A A" Row3: ". A A . ." Row4: "A A A A A" Row5: ". A A . A" That's 5 rows, each 5 columns? Row1 length 5, row2 length5, row3 length5, row4 length5, row5 length5 (though last row ends with A). So 5x5 square. So rule: repeat 5 times across and down, making 25x25 output. Thus output grid is 25 rows, each 25 columns, formed by tiling the 5x5 pattern in a 5x5 block. We need to generate output. Let's define input matrix I[i][j] for i=0..4, j=0..4. Rows: 0: . A A . . 1: A A A A A 2: . A A . . 3: A A A A A 4: . A A . A Now output O of size 25x25 where O[i*5 + r][j*5 + c] = I[r][c] for block row i (0..4) and block col j (0..4). Equivalent to repeating pattern. Thus each row of output is the input row repeated 5 times horizontally. So we can construct each of the 5 distinct row patterns repeated horizontally 5 times, and then repeat those 5 rows vertically 5 times. Let's compute horizontal repetition for each input row: Row0 pattern: ". A A . ." Repeated 5 times: concatenate 5 copies separated by space? Actually just characters. So sequence length 25: ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." Let's write as characters with spaces between for readability. Row0 repeated: Copy1: . A A . . Copy2: . A A . . Copy3: . A A . . Copy4: . A A . . Copy5: . A A . . Thus row0 output line: ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." Similarly Row1: "A A A A A" repeated 5 times => 25 A's. Row1 output line: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" Row2 same as Row0: ". A A . ." Row3 same as Row1: all A. Row4: ". A A . A" repeated 5 times. Let's compute Row4 pattern: ". A A . A". Repeating 5 times yields: ". A A . A . A A . A . A A . A . A A . A . A A . A" Check length: each copy 5, times5 =25. ... [3216 chars truncated]
"An engineer etches a single circuit module onto a wafer. The module's own pin count determines how many copies are stamped across the silicon — width pins across, height pins down."
120b: k=2
See: A small circuit module: colored traces and components on a dark substrate.
Do: Stamp the module across the wafer: as many copies horizontally as the module has columns of pins, and as many vertically as it has rows of pins.
Grid: The finished wafer is a uniform array of identical modules, every trace and pad in perfect registration with its neighbors.
We need to infer rule. The description: "small circuit module: colored traces and components on a dark substrate. Stamp the module across the wafer: as many copies horizontally as the module has columns of pins, and as many vertically as it has rows of pins. The finished wafer is a uniform array of identical modules, every trace and pad in perfect registration with its neighbors." Interpretation: Input grid is a module. Output is tiling of the module repeated both horizontally and vertically, number of repeats equal to number of columns and rows of pins? Possibly the module is repeated to form a larger grid where each cell of the original becomes a block? Let's examine Example1. Input1 is 3x3? Actually lines: ". . A" "A A A" "A . ." That's 3 rows, 3 columns. Output is 9x9? Let's see: Output lines show 9 columns each row? First line: ". . A . . A . . A" that's 9 entries. Number of rows also 9. So output is 3 times larger in each dimension? Actually 3x3 input -> 9x9 output, factor 3. So repeated 3 times horizontally and vertically. That matches "as many copies horizontally as the module has columns of pins" i.e., number of columns = 3, so repeat 3 times horizontally; similarly rows = 3 repeat vertically. So output is input tiled 3x3 grid (i.e., each cell becomes a block of size 3x3? Wait tiling 3x3 copies of the whole module yields size 9x9. That's exactly what we see: the output appears to be the input repeated in a 3x3 block pattern. Let's verify pattern: Input rows: r1: . . A r2: A A A r3: A . . If we tile 3x3 copies, the output rows would be: first three rows correspond to first copy row1 repeated 3 times? Actually tiling means we place copies side by side. So first row of output would be row1 of copy1 + row1 of copy2 + row1 of copy3. Since each copy row1 is ". . A". So concatenated three times gives ". . A . . A . . A". matches. Second row of output would be row2 of copy1 + row2 of copy2 + row2 of copy3: "A A A A A A A A A". matches. Third row: row3 repeated thrice: "A . . A . . A . .". matches. Then rows 4-6 repeat same pattern for second vertical copy: again row1, row2, row3 etc. Indeed output rows 4-6 are same as rows1-3. So yes it's simple tiling. Example2: Input is 2x2? Actually lines: "B ." "B B" That's 2 rows, 2 columns. Output is 4x4? Let's see: Output lines: "B . B ." "B B B B" "B . B ." "B B B B" That's 4 rows, 4 columns. So tiled 2x2 copies (since input size 2). So rule: output = input tiled both dimensions by factor equal to its own dimensions (i.e., repeat input N times horizontally where N = number of columns, and M times vertically where M = number of rows). Equivalent to Kronecker product with a matrix of ones of size (rows, cols). So output size = rows*rows? Wait horizontal repeat count = number of columns, vertical repeat count = number of rows. So output dimensions = rows * rows? Actually vertical repeats = number of rows, horizontal repeats = number of columns. So output rows = rows * rows? No, each vertical re ... [5021 chars truncated]
"A god carves a single rune into the void. The rune's own geometry compels it to propagate — its width spawning echoes across the horizon, its height summoning reflections into the abyss."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sacred rune: colored sigils inscribed against the dark primordial void.
Do: The rune obeys its nature and replicates: it manifests across the firmament as many times as it has columns, and descends as many times as it has rows.
Grid: The cosmos is inscribed with a perfect lattice of identical runes, each sigil touching its twin, the void between them shared and seamless.
"A dancer marks a small square of floor with their routine. The company then fills the ballroom — each dancer performing the same steps, the original square's proportions deciding how many dancers fit."
120b: k=2
See: A small dance floor tile: colored footprints and positions against dark empty floor.
Do: Fill the ballroom: place as many dancers across as the tile has steps wide, and as many rows as the tile has steps deep. Each performer mirrors the original routine.
Grid: The ballroom is a grid of synchronized dancers, every footprint and pause replicated — the floor a seamless repetition of the original choreography.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is small, output seems larger. Example1: Input 3x3? Actually input lines: ". . A" (3), "A A A", "A . ." => 3x3. Output is 9x9? Let's see output lines: first line ". . A . . A . . A" that's 9 columns. Number of rows? Provided 9 rows. So output is 3 times larger in both dimensions (scale factor 3). Pattern appears to be tiling the input pattern repeatedly both horizontally and vertically, but also maybe each tile is mirrored? Let's examine: Input matrix: Row0: . . A Row1: A A A Row2: A . . Output first 3 rows correspond to first tile row? Let's break output into 3x3 blocks each of size 3? Actually output 9x9 can be seen as 3x3 blocks each of size 3x3 replicating input? Let's check block (0,0) rows0-2 cols0-2: rows0-2 of output: Row0 cols0-2: . . A matches input row0. Row1 cols0-2: A A A matches input row1. Row2 cols0-2: A . . matches input row2. So block (0,0) is original. Block (0,1) rows0-2 cols3-5: Row0 cols3-5: . . A matches row0 again. Row1: A A A matches row1. Row2: A . . matches row2. So repeated horizontally. Thus output is just tiling the input pattern both horizontally and vertically to fill a grid of size (n*m) where n = input rows, m = input cols? Actually scaling factor equals input size? For 3x3 input, output is 9x9 = 3*3 each dimension. So factor = input dimension (size). For non-square? Example2: Input 2x2? Actually lines: "B ." (2 columns) and "B B" (2 columns) => 2 rows, 2 cols. Output is 4x4. That's factor 2 (input rows) = 2, also input cols =2. So output size = input rows * input rows? Wait input rows=2, output rows=4 = 2*2. Input cols=2, output cols=4 = 2*2. So factor = input rows (or cols) which are equal? For square it's same. So rule: repeat the input pattern both horizontally and vertically a number of times equal to the number of rows (or columns) of the input. Essentially create a tiled grid of size (R*R) x (C*R) where R = number of rows, C = number of columns. But if non-square, maybe factor = number of rows? Let's test with example1: rows=3, cols=3, output rows=9 = 3*3, cols=9 = 3*3. Works. Thus for test input: we need to count rows. Input grid lines: 1: ". A A . ." 2: "A A A A A" 3: ". A A . ." 4: "A A A A A" 5: ". A A . A" That's 5 rows, each 5 columns. So output will be 5*5 = 25 rows and 5*5 = 25 columns, tiled 5x5 copies of the original. Thus we need to produce a 25x25 grid where each 5x5 block is the original pattern. We can generate by repeating each row 5 times horizontally, and then repeat the whole set of rows 5 times vertically. Let's write original rows as strings of characters separated by spaces? Output format expects spaces between characters. We'll produce rows of 25 characters separated by spaces. First compute the 5 original rows as arrays: R0: . A A . . R1: A A A A A R2: . A ... wait row2: ". A A . ." same as row0. R3: A A A A A same as row1. R4: ". A A . A" Now horizontal tiling: each row repeated 5 times side by side. For R0 repeated 5 times: seque ... [2507 chars truncated]
"A crystal seed holds a unit cell — the smallest repeating structure. Under pressure, the crystal grows, stacking that cell into a lattice whose extent is governed by the cell's own axes."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A mineral unit cell: colored atoms bonded against dark empty lattice points.
Do: Let the crystal grow: the unit cell replicates along its horizontal axis as many times as it has columns, and along its vertical axis as many times as it has rows.
Grid: The mature crystal is a perfect lattice of identical unit cells, every atom and void in periodic alignment — the macroscopic form a faithful multiplication of the microscopic seed.
"A baker scores a single decorative tile into fondant, then rolls out enough copies to frost the entire cake — the tile's own shape decides how many cuts to make in each direction."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small fondant tile with colored sugar decorations pressed into a dark chocolate base.
Do: Repeat the tile across the countertop: lay as many copies side-by-side as the tile is wide, and stack as many rows as the tile is tall.
Grid: The finished sheet is a seamless mosaic of identical fondant squares. No gaps, no overlaps, every sugar crystal in its mirrored position.
"A short musical phrase insists on being heard — it echoes across the orchestra pit, each instrument picking it up until the phrase's own meter fills the entire score."
120b: k=1
See: A brief motif: colored notes against silent rests on a small staff.
Do: Let the motif repeat itself: it sounds across as many voices as it has beats, and cascades down through as many measures as it has lines.
Grid: The full score is a seamless wall of sound — the motif tiled perfectly so that every entrance and rest aligns with its neighbors.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3? Actually example input grid: ". . A" "A A A" "A . ." That's 3 rows, 3 columns. Output is 9x9? Let's see output lines: first line ". . A . . A . . A" that's 9 columns. There are 9 rows. So output is 3 times larger in both dimensions? Actually 3x3 input -> 9x9 output, scaling factor 3. Pattern seems to tile the input motif across both dimensions, but also maybe rotate? Let's examine output pattern: It appears to be repeating the input motif in a 3x3 block grid, each block is the original 3x3? Let's check: The output first 3 rows correspond to first block row? Output rows 1-3: Row1: . . A . . A . . A Row2: A A A A A A A A A Row3: A . . A . . A . . That looks like three copies of the input placed side by side horizontally: Input rows are: r1: . . A r2: A A A r3: A . . If we repeat horizontally three times, we get: r1 repeated: . . A . . A . . A matches row1. r2 repeated: A A A A A A A A A matches row2. r3 repeated: A . . A . . A . . matches row3. So first three rows are horizontal tiling. Then rows 4-6: . . A . . A . . A etc. That's same as rows1-3 repeated vertically. Indeed rows4-6 equal rows1-3 again. And rows7-9 equal rows1-3 again. So output is just the input tiled 3x3 (both dimensions) to make a larger grid of size (n*3) where n is original dimension? Actually scaling factor equals original size (3). So output size = input size squared? For 3x3 input, output 9x9 = 3*3 each dimension. So factor = input dimension (3). For general input of size N x N, output size N*N? Let's test with test input: it's 5x5? Let's count rows: given test input lines: ". A A . ." "A A A A A" ". A A . ." "A A A A A" ". A A . A" That's 5 rows, each 5 columns. So N=5. According to rule, output should be tiled 5x5 blocks, each block is the original 5x5 motif, resulting in 25x25 grid. That seems huge. But maybe that's expected. Check if any other transformation like also vertical tiling same as horizontal. So output is just repeat the whole input grid both horizontally and vertically N times. Thus output grid = input repeated N times in both dimensions. So for test input N=5, produce 25 rows each of length 25, where each row is the input row repeated 5 times horizontally, and the block of 5 rows repeated 5 times vertically. Let's construct. First define input rows as strings of characters separated by spaces? We'll output with spaces. Input rows: Row0: . A A . . Row1: A A A A A Row2: . A A . . Row3: A A A A A Row4: . A A . A Now repeat each row 5 times horizontally: concatenate the row 5 times. Row0 repeated: ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." That's 5 copies, each 5 elements => 25 elements. Similarly Row1 repeated: "A A A A A" repeated 5 times. Row2 same as Row0. Row3 same as Row1. Row4: ". A A . A" repeated 5 times. Now vertical repetition: we need to output these 5 block rows each repeated 5 times in order. So final output rows 0-4 = Row0 repeated horizontally. Rows 5-9 = Row1 re ... [2884 chars truncated]
"A coach draws a play on a small whiteboard, then discovers the stadium jumbotron mirrors the diagram across the whole field — the play's dimensions dictating how many times it appears."
120b: k=1
See: A small play diagram with colored player positions on a dark field.
Do: Project the diagram onto the full field: repeat it horizontally as many times as the diagram is wide, and vertically as many times as the diagram is tall.
Grid: The jumbotron shows a massive formation of identical play diagrams tiled edge-to-edge, filling the screen perfectly.
We need to infer rule: The description says repeat diagram horizontally as many times as diagram is wide, and vertically as many times as diagram is tall. So tile the input pattern to fill a larger grid? In example 1, input is 3x3? Let's see: Input lines: ". . A" (3), "A A A", "A . ." => 3x3. Output is 9x9? Let's count rows: output lines shown: there are 9 rows. Each row length? first row: ". . A . . A . . A" that's 9 cells. So output is 3 times larger in both dimensions (since width=3, height=3). So they tiled the 3x3 pattern 3 times horizontally and 3 times vertically, making a 9x9 grid. Indeed each 3x3 block repeats. Check pattern: Input pattern: Row0: . . A Row1: A A A Row2: A . . Now tile 3x3 blocks: The output first three rows correspond to first tile row? Let's compute: Tiling 3x3 pattern across 3 columns yields each row repeated 3 times horizontally. For row0: . . A repeated 3 times => . . A . . A . . A matches output row0. Row1: A A A repeated => A A A A A A A A A matches output row1. Row2: A . . repeated => A . . A . . A . . matches output row2. Then next three rows correspond to second vertical tile: same as rows0-2 again. Indeed output rows3-5 repeat rows0-2. And rows6-8 repeat again. So rule: output = input tiled both dimensions by factor equal to its own size (i.e., repeat N times where N = number of rows = number of columns). So output size = N^2 x N^2? Actually input is N x N (square). Output is N*N rows and N*N columns (i.e., N times larger each dimension). So tile N x N pattern N times each direction. Now test input: Provided grid is not square? Let's see: lines: ". A A . ." "A A A A A" ". A A . ." "A A A A A" ". A A . A" Count columns: first row has 5 entries. So width=5. Number of rows = 5 as well (5 lines). So it's 5x5 square. Good. Thus output should be 5*5 = 25 rows and 25 columns, tiling the 5x5 pattern 5 times horizontally and vertically. We need to produce 25x25 grid. Let's denote input pattern rows (R0..R4) each length 5. R0: . A A . . R1: A A A A A R2: . A A . . R3: A A A A A R4: . A A . A Now output rows: For each tile row index t from 0 to 4 (vertical repetition), we output the 5 rows of pattern, each repeated horizontally 5 times. So overall output rows order: For t=0: rows0-4 repeated horizontally. Then t=1: rows0-4 again, etc total 5 groups. Thus we need to construct a 25x25 grid. Let's compute horizontal repetition of each row: repeat the 5-element sequence 5 times concatenated. Define function repeatRow(row): row repeated 5 times. Row0 pattern: . A A . . => sequence: . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . (that's 5 repeats). Let's write as 25 entries. Let's produce each repeated row as string with spaces. I'll write each row as list of 25 characters. Row0 repeated: Repeat1: . A A . . Repeat2: . A A . . Repeat3: . A A . . Repeat4: . A A . . Repeat5: . A A . . So row0_out = ". A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . . . A A . ." Count: each repeat 5, total 25. Row1 pattern ... [1690 chars truncated]
"A single storm cell is photographed by satellite. The pressure system then clones itself across the map — its own footprint determining how far the front extends."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small weather cell: colored bands of precipitation against calm dark skies.
Do: The cell replicates across the radar screen, spawning copies equal to its own width across the horizon and copies equal to its own height from pole to equator.
Grid: The radar map becomes a repeating mosaic of identical storm cells, seamless and perfectly periodic.
"An architect designs one window panel, then lets the window's own proportions determine how many panels fill the cathedral wall — width begets columns, height begets rows."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small stained-glass panel with colored glass pieces set in a dark leading frame.
Do: Install copies of the panel into the cathedral window: as many columns as the panel has panes across, and as many rows as the panel has panes down.
Grid: The finished rose window is a grid of identical panels fitted edge to edge, each piece of colored glass in its proper place.
"A general arranges one squadron into formation, then deploys the formation across the battlefield — the squadron's own rank-and-file count dictating how many units fill the theater of war."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small squadron: colored soldiers standing in formation against empty dark ground.
Do: Marshal the army by copying the squadron: deploy as many units across the front as there are soldiers in a row, and as many ranks deep as there are rows in the squadron.
Grid: The battlefield is covered in a seamless grid of identical squadrons, every soldier in lockstep with their counterpart in neighboring units.
"A choreographer blocks one scene on a tiny stage model. Opening night, the scene is performed simultaneously on a grid of stages — the model's own dimensions deciding the size of the theater complex."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A miniature stage with colored actors positioned against a dark backdrop.
Do: Replicate the scene: build as many stages side by side as the model is wide, and stack as many tiers as the model is tall. Each stage performs the identical blocking.
Grid: The audience sees a vast wall of identical stages, every actor in the same position, every dark space preserved — a seamless theatrical mosaic.
"A gardener designs a planting square — then lets the square's own dimensions tell them how many times to repeat it across the plot, filling the garden bed edge to edge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A small planting template: colored flowers set among dark soil patches.
Do: Lay the template down repeatedly: as many times across as there are columns in the template, and as many times down as there are rows.
Grid: The garden bed is a uniform quilt of identical planting squares, every flower and every bare patch in perfect periodic alignment.
See: The input consists of two 4×4 grids stacked vertically, separated by a horizontal row of yellow (Y) cells. The top grid contains blue (B) and black (.) cells. The bottom grid contains red (R) and black (.) cells. The yellow row always spans the full width and acts as a divider.
Do: 1. Split the input at the yellow divider row to obtain the top grid (blue/black) and the bottom grid (red/black). 2. Create an output grid of the same dimensions as either sub-grid. 3. For each cell position: if the top grid has blue OR the bottom grid has red at that position, set the output cell to green (G). Otherwise, set it to black (.). This is a logical OR of the two grids' non-black cells.
Grid: The input grid is 4 columns wide and 9 rows tall (4-row top grid + 1 yellow divider row + 4-row bottom grid). The output grid is 4×4. Background color is black (.). The only colors in the output are green (G) and black (.).
"Two armies join forces across a golden bridge to form a united front."
120b: k=3
See: Two kingdoms sit on opposite sides of a golden bridge. The northern kingdom flies blue banners from some of its towers, while the southern kingdom lights red fires atop others. The darkness between them marks empty watchtowers where no one stands guard.
Do: The golden bridge opens and the two kingdoms merge their defenses. Any watchtower that had a blue banner flying OR a red fire burning sends a soldier to the unified army, marked in green. Only towers that were dark and abandoned in BOTH kingdoms remain empty in the new realm.
Grid: The world is a tall fortress split by a golden bridge spanning the full width. Above and below the bridge lie matching castle walls. The united army's banner—green against the darkness—flies only where at least one kingdom once kept watch.
We need to infer rule. From description: two kingdoms north and south separated by golden bridge (maybe a row of Y's? In examples, there is a row of Y Y Y Y in middle). Input grids have top part (north) with B's and . (black) maybe representing blue banners and empty towers. Bottom part (south) with R's and . representing red fires and empty. The Y row is the bridge. Output only includes top part? In examples output only shows top part rows (same number as top part?). Let's examine Example1. Input dimensions: Let's count rows. Provided as lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows, each 4 columns. The Y row is row5 (index 4). So top part rows 1-4 (north), bottom part rows 6-9 (south). Output: G G . G G . G . G G . G G G G G That's 4 rows, 4 columns. So output corresponds to top part rows (north) transformed: each cell becomes G if either north cell was B (blue) OR corresponding south cell (same column) was R (red). If both are '.' (black) then output '.'? Let's test. We need mapping: For each column, row position? The rule likely merges the two halves: For each position (i,j) in north half (rows above Y), look at north cell (maybe B or .) and the corresponding south cell (same column, but row mirrored? The description: "Only towers that were dark and abandoned in BOTH kingdoms remain empty". So if both north and south have '.' (black), output '.'; else output G (green). So output is green wherever at least one of the two corresponding cells (north and south) is not '.' (i.e., B or R). Let's verify with Example1. Create arrays: North rows (1-4): 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B South rows (6-9): 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . Now compute per column per row (same row index? The description says "merge their defenses" maybe aligning rows: row1 north aligns with row1 south? But there are 4 north rows and 4 south rows, same count. So row1 north aligns with row1 south (row6). Let's test. Row1 north: B B . . Row1 south: R R . R Combine: any B or R => G, else . So positions: col1: B or R => G col2: B or R => G col3: . and . => . (both .) => . col4: . and R => G Result row1: G G . G matches output row1. Good. Row2 north: B . B . Row2 south: . . R . Combine: col1 B or . => G; col2 . and . => . ; col3 B or R => G ; col4 . and . => . => G . G . matches output row2: G . G . correct. Row3 north: B B . B Row3 south: . R . . (row8) Combine: col1 B or . => G ; col2 B or R => G ; col3 . and . => . ; col4 B or . => G => G G . G matches output row3: G G . G correct. Row4 north: B B B B Row4 south: R . R . (row9) Combine: col1 B or R => G ; col2 B or . => G ; col3 B or R => G ; col4 B or . => G => G G G G matches output row4. Good. Thus rule confirmed. Now Example2. Input rows count? Let's list. Rows: 1 B B B . 2 . B . B 3 . . B B 4 B B . B 5 Y Y Y Y 6 . . . R 7 . . . R 8 R R R R 9 R R . R North rows 1-4, South ro ... [3440 chars truncated]
"Two strands of DNA, one coding for cold pigment and one for warm, are spliced together across a membrane. Wherever either strand carries an active gene, the hybrid organism expresses a new phenotype—a living mosaic of merged inheritance."
120b: k=3
See: A two-chambered petri dish divided by a golden membrane. The upper culture shows cold-pigment colonies; the lower shows warm-pigment colonies. Empty sites are sterile.
Do: Fuse the two cultures through the membrane. Any site where at least one chamber harbored a living colony blooms into a hybrid organism of a novel hue. Sterile sites remain barren.
Grid: Output is a single 4×4 dish. Hybrid colonies appear where either parent culture was active. Empty where both were sterile.
We need to infer rule. From description: two chambers: upper culture shows cold-pigment colonies; lower shows warm-pigment colonies. Input appears to be 10 rows? Actually examples: Input shows 10 rows of 4 columns? Let's examine Example1 Input: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows? Count: 1-4 rows of B (blue) maybe upper chamber? Then row5 Y Y Y Y (maybe separator? Actually Y is yellow). Then rows 6-9 are R etc. So total 9 rows. Output is 4x4 grid. Interpretation: Upper chamber is first 4 rows (cold pigment colonies) using blue B. Lower chamber is last 4 rows (warm pigment colonies) using red R. The row of Y Y Y Y maybe the golden membrane? Actually description: two-chambered petri dish divided by a golden membrane. So Y (yellow) maybe the membrane row separating chambers. So input consists of top 4 rows (blue pattern), a row of Y (membrane), then bottom 4 rows (red pattern). Output is 4x4 where each cell is G (green) if either top or bottom had a colony (i.e., B or R) at that position; else . (black) if both were empty (.) . Indeed check Example1: top 4x4 pattern of B and . ; bottom 4x4 pattern of R and . ; output G where either B or R present. Let's verify Example1: top rows: Row1: B B . . Row2: B . B . Row3: B B . B Row4: B B B B Bottom rows (rows6-9): Row6: R R . R Row7: . . R . Row8: . R . . Row9: R . R . Now compute OR: For each column, if top B or bottom R => G else . Let's compute: Create 4x4 grid positions (r1-4, c1-4). Top matrix T, bottom matrix Btm. T: 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B Btm: 1: R R . R 2: . . R . 3: . R . . 4: R . R . Now OR: cell (1,1): top B => G. (1,2): top B => G. (1,3): top . bottom . => . matches output row1 col3 '.' yes output row1: G G . G (col4 top . bottom R => G). So matches. Check row2: top row2: B . B . ; bottom row2: . . R . => OR: col1 B => G, col2 ./. => ., col3 B or R => G, col4 ./. => . Output row2: G . G . matches. Row3: top row3: B B . B ; bottom row3: . R . . => OR: col1 G, col2 G, col3 ./. => ., col4 B => G. Output row3: G G . G matches. Row4: top row4: B B B B ; bottom row4: R . R . => OR all G. Output row4: G G G G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Example2: top 4 rows B pattern, bottom 4 rows R pattern (with some .). Output matches OR. Example3 also matches. Thus transformation: Input consists of 9 rows: first 4 rows of blue/., row5 all Y (separator), last 4 rows of red/., output 4x4 where each cell is G if either top or bottom cell is non-blank (i.e., B or R), else . (black). So basically logical OR. Now test input: Given: B . B . B . B . . B . . B . B . Y Y Y Y R R . . . . R . . R . R R R R . Let's parse. Top 4 rows (rows1-4): 1: B . B . 2: B . B . 3: . B . . 4: B . B . Bottom 4 rows (rows6-9): 6: R R . . 7: . . R . 8: . R . R 9: R R R . Now compute OR per position. Create grid positions (r1-4, c1-4). We'll compute. I'll label columns 1-4. Top matrix T: Row1: col1 ... [1287 chars truncated]
"Two nebulae—one of cool plasma, one of hot plasma—drift on opposite sides of a golden accretion band. When they collide through the band, every region where either nebula had matter ignites into a new kind of star."
120b: k=2
See: A starfield bisected by a golden band. Above: patches of cool nebular gas. Below: patches of hot nebular gas. The rest is void.
Do: Collapse both nebulae through the band. Any region containing gas from either nebula ignites into a newborn star. Void remains only where both sides were empty.
Grid: A 4×4 star chart with newborn stars where either nebula contributed matter.
We need to infer rule. The description: starfield bisected by a golden band. Above: patches of cool nebular gas. Below: patches of hot nebular gas. The rest is void. Collapse both nebulae through the band. Any region containing gas from either nebula ignites into a newborn star. Void remains only where both sides were empty. Interpretation: Input grid is 10 rows? Actually examples show 10 rows: first 4 rows maybe top region (above band), then a row of Y Y Y Y (the golden band?), then rows of R etc (below). Let's examine Example1 input: rows: 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B 5: Y Y Y Y 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . Output: 4 rows? Actually output shows 4 rows: G G . G etc. So output corresponds to the band-collapsed result? Probably we take the top 4 rows (above band) and bottom 4 rows (below band) each of size 4x4, collapse them (like overlay) through the band: For each column/row position, if either top or bottom has a colored cell (non-.) then output G (green) else .? But output shows G where either top had B (blue) or bottom had R (red) etc. Let's test. Take Example1 top region (rows1-4): Row1: B B . . Row2: B . B . Row3: B B . B Row4: B B B B Bottom region (rows6-9): Row6: R R . R Row7: . . R . Row8: . R . . Row9: R . R . Now combine: For each position, if either top or bottom has a non-., output G else .? Let's compute. Create 4x4 grid positions (col1-4). We'll compute. Pos (1,1): top row1 col1 = B (non-.) => G. Output row1 col1 = G (yes) (1,2): top row1 col2 = B => G. Output G (yes) (1,3): top row1 col3 = . ; bottom row6 col3 = .? Wait bottom row6 col3 = . (since row6: R R . R) col3 '.' . So both empty => output should be . . Output row1 col3 = . (yes) (1,4): top row1 col4 = . ; bottom row6 col4 = R (non-.) => G. Output row1 col4 = G (yes) Row2: top row2: B . B . ; bottom row7: . . R . Combine: col1: top B => G (output row2 col1 G) yes. col2: top . ; bottom . => . output row2 col2 '.'? Output row2 col2 is '.' (yes) col3: top B => G output row2 col3 G yes. col4: top . ; bottom . => . output row2 col4 '.'? Output row2 col4 '.'? Actually output row2: "G . G ." matches. Row3: top row3: B B . B ; bottom row8: . R . . Combine: col1: top B => G (output G) yes. col2: top B => G (output G) yes. col3: top . ; bottom . => . output '.'? Output row3 col3 '.' yes. col4: top B => G output G yes. Row4: top row4: B B B B ; bottom row9: R . R . Combine: col1: top B => G (output G) yes. col2: top B => G (output G) yes. col3: top B => G (output G) yes. col4: top B => G (output G) yes. Matches! So rule: output is 4x4 grid where each cell is G if either the top region cell (above golden band) or the bottom region cell (below band) is non-blank (i.e., not '.'), else '.'. Now Example2 to verify. Example2 input top rows (1-4): 1: B B B . 2: . B . B 3: . . B B 4: B B . B Bottom rows (6-9) (since row5 is Y Y Y Y): 6: . . . R 7: . . . R 8: R R R R 9: R R . R Now compute output expe ... [2563 chars truncated]
"Two fleets—one flying cold-water pennants, the other warm-water pennants—are separated by a golden sandbar. When the tide erases the bar, every anchorage occupied by either fleet flies a unified ensign."
120b: k=2
See: A harbor chart split by a golden sandbar. Above: one fleet's anchorages marked in cool tones. Below: another fleet's in warm tones. Empty berths are open water.
Do: Erase the sandbar and merge the harbor. Any berth occupied by either fleet now flies a combined ensign. Only berths empty in both charts remain open water.
Grid: A 4×4 harbor with unified ensigns where either fleet had a ship.
We need to understand puzzle. Input seems to be two 4x? Actually description: 4x4 harbor with unified ensigns where either fleet had a ship. The input appears to be 10 rows? Let's examine example 1 input: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows? Count: 1-4 are blue rows (first fleet?), then row5 Y Y Y Y (maybe separator sandbar?), then rows6-9 red rows? Actually there are 9 rows total. 4 rows of blue, then a row of Y (yellow) maybe sandbar, then 4 rows of red? But we have rows6-9: R R . R ; . . R . ; . R . . ; R . R . That's 4 rows. So total 9 rows: 4+1+4 =9. So grid is 4 columns, 9 rows. The sandbar is the row of Y (yellow) across entire width. The description: "harbor chart split by a golden sandbar". So Y row is sandbar. Above are "cool tones" (blue) representing one fleet. Below are "warm tones" (red) representing another fleet. The transformation: erase sandbar and merge the harbor. Any berth occupied by either fleet now flies a combined ensign (green). Only berths empty in both charts remain open water (black '.' maybe). So output is 4x4? Actually after merging, we only keep the 4x4 region? The output example 1 is 4 rows, 4 columns. So they removed the sandbar row and maybe also removed the empty rows? Wait they output 4 rows, which correspond to the 4 columns and 4 rows? The original above and below each have 4 rows. After merging, we combine the two 4x4 grids (top and bottom) into a single 4x4 grid where each cell is green if either top or bottom had a ship (blue or red), else black if both empty. So we overlay the two 4x4 quadrants (top and bottom) aligning them? Probably they are stacked vertically separated by sandbar; after removing sandbar, we overlay them (i.e., combine corresponding positions). So output is 4x4. Thus rule: For each column (0-3) and each row index 0-3 (relative to top quadrant), look at cell in top quadrant (rows 0-3) and bottom quadrant (rows 5-8) (since row 4 is sandbar). If either is B or R (i.e., not '.'), output G. Else output '.'. Check example 1: Let's compute quickly to verify. Top quadrant (rows0-3): Row0: B B . . Row1: B . B . Row2: B B . B Row3: B B B B Bottom quadrant (rows5-8): Row5: R R . R Row6: . . R . Row7: . R . . Row8: R . R . Now overlay: For each position, if any B or R present => G else '.'. Compute row0: top B B . . ; bottom row5 R R . R. So each column: col0: B or R => G col1: B or R => G col2: . and . => . (both empty) => . col3: . and R => G Thus row0 output: G G . G matches example output row0: G G . G correct. Row1: top B . B . ; bottom row6 . . R . => col0 B => G; col1 ./. => . ; col2 B or R => G ; col3 ./. => . => G . G . matches example row1: G . G . correct. Row2: top B B . B ; bottom row7 . R . . => col0 B => G; col1 B or R => G; col2 ./. => . ; col3 B/. => G => G G . G matches example row2: G G . G correct. Row3: top B B B B ; bottom row8 R . R . => col0 B/R => ... [2211 chars truncated]
"Two circuit layers—one carrying cool-band signals, one carrying warm-band signals—are laminated across a golden bus. The output board lights an indicator wherever either layer carried current."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A two-layer PCB split by a golden bus trace. The upper layer has active traces in some cells; the lower layer has active traces in others. Dead cells carry no current.
Do: Laminate the layers through the bus. Any cell where either layer carried current lights a unified indicator. Cells dead on both layers stay off.
Grid: A 4×4 output board with lit indicators wherever either layer was active.
"The god of winter scatters frost runes on one side of a golden river; the god of summer scatters fire runes on the other. A mortal hero fords the river and collects every rune from both banks, each transmuted into a rune of life."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A mythic river of gold divides two banks. One bank bears scattered frost runes; the other bears scattered fire runes. Some ground on each bank is bare.
Do: Ford the river and unite the banks. Every position bearing a rune from either god transforms into a life rune. Only ground bare on both banks remains empty.
Grid: A 4×4 map of life runes where either bank had a rune placed.
"Two dance companies rehearse on opposite sides of a golden ribbon stretched across the floor. One leaves cool chalk marks, the other warm chalk marks. For the finale, every spot marked by either company is danced upon in unison."
120b: k=4
See: A rehearsal floor split by a golden ribbon. Above: chalk marks from one company in cool tones. Below: marks from another in warm tones. Unmarked floor is bare.
Do: Remove the ribbon and combine choreographies. Any floor tile marked by either company is danced upon, leaving a unified mark. Only doubly-unmarked tiles stay clean.
Grid: A 4×4 floor showing unified dance marks wherever either company rehearsed.
We need to infer rule. The description: 4x4 floor showing unified dance marks wherever either company rehearsed. Input seems to have 10 rows? Actually each example input shows 10 rows: first 4 rows maybe blue pattern, then a row of Y's, then 5 rows of red? Let's examine. Example1 Input rows: 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B 5: Y Y Y Y 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . Output: 4 rows: G G . G G . G . G G . G G G G G So output is 4x4 grid. It seems we combine top 4 rows (blue) and bottom 4 rows (red) after the Y row separator. The Y row is the golden ribbon? The description: floor split by golden ribbon. Above: chalk marks from one company in cool tones (blue). Below: marks from another in warm tones (red). Unmarked floor is bare (black '.' maybe). Remove ribbon and combine choreographies. Any floor tile marked by either company is danced upon, leaving a unified mark. Only doubly-unmarked tiles stay clean. Thus we take the 4x4 top region (rows 1-4) and bottom region (rows 6-9) (since row5 is Y separator). For each corresponding cell (same column, same relative position), if either top or bottom has a mark (i.e., not '.'), output G (green). If both are '.' then output '.'? In examples output shows '.' only where both are '.'? Let's verify. Example1 top matrix (4x4): [ [B,B,.,.], [B,.,B,.], [B,B,.,B], [B,B,B,B] ] Bottom matrix rows 6-9: row6: R R . R row7: . . R . row8: . R . . row9: R . R . Now combine: For each cell, if either top or bottom is not '.' => G else '.'. Compute: Row1 col1: top B (not .) => G col2: top B => G col3: top . ; bottom .? bottom row6 col3 is '.' => both . => '.' (output row1 col3 is .) matches output .? Output row1: G G . G yes. col4: top . ; bottom row6 col4 R => G. matches. Row2: top row2: B . B . bottom row7: . . R . col1: B => G (output G) col2: . and . => . (output .) matches. col3: B or R => G (output G) col4: . and . => . (output .) matches. Row3: top row3: B B . B bottom row8: . R . . col1: B => G (output G) col2: B or R => G (output G) col3: . and . => . (output .) col4: B => G (output G) matches. Row4: top row4: B B B B bottom row9: R . R . col1: B => G col2: B => G col3: B or R => G col4: B => G matches output all G. Thus rule holds. Check Example2. Input top rows 1-4: 1: B B B . 2: . B . B 3: . . B B 4: B B . B Bottom rows 6-9 (since row5 Y): 6: . . . R 7: . . . R 8: R R R R 9: R R . R Combine: Compute output expected per rule. Let's compute quickly. Row1 top: B B B . bottom row6: . . . R col1: B => G (output G) col2: B => G col3: B => G col4: . and R => G Thus row1: G G G G matches output. Row2 top: . B . B bottom row7: . . . R col1: . and . => . (output .) col2: B => G (output G) col3: . and . => . (output .) col4: B or R => G (output G) => . G . G matches output. Row3 top: . . B B bottom row8: R R R R col1: . or R => G col2: . or R => G col3: B or R => G col4: B or R => G ... [1884 chars truncated]
"Two mineral deposits—one of cool ore, one of hot ore—lie on opposite sides of a golden fault line. When tectonic pressure fuses them, every vein from either deposit crystallizes into a new gemstone."
120b: k=2
See: A cross-section of earth split by a golden fault. Above: veins of cool mineral in some positions. Below: veins of hot mineral in others. The rest is barren rock.
Do: Apply tectonic pressure to fuse the layers across the fault. Any position containing ore from either deposit crystallizes into a new gem. Barren-on-both positions remain plain rock.
Grid: A 4×4 geological layer with gemstones wherever either deposit had a mineral vein.
We need to infer rule. From description: 4x4 geological layer with gemstones wherever either deposit had a mineral vein. Input seems to be 9 rows? Actually examples show 9 rows input, output 4 rows. Let's examine. Example1 Input lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows, each 4 columns. Output 4 rows 4 columns: G G . G G . G . G G . G G G G G Interpretation: top 4 rows maybe "above fault" (cool mineral) represented by B (blue). Bottom 4 rows maybe "below fault" (hot mineral) represented by R (red). The middle row (row5) Y Y Y Y maybe the fault line? Actually Y is yellow maybe the fault line (golden fault). In description: "split by a golden fault". So Y row is the fault. So input consists of top 4 rows (above), then a row of Y (fault), then bottom 4 rows (below). Output is 4x4 grid representing fused layer: any position where either above or below had a mineral (B or R) becomes G (green gem). Positions where both are empty (.) remain . (black). Indeed output only contains G and . . Let's test. Take column positions. For each of the 4x4 positions, we look at the cell above (in top 4 rows) and below (in bottom 4 rows). If either is B (above) or R (below) then output G else . Let's verify with example1. Top 4 rows (rows1-4): 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B Bottom 4 rows (rows6-9): 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . Now compute for each column row index (1-4). Let's compute position (row1,col1): top row1 col1 = B, bottom row6 col1 = R => either => G. Output row1 col1 = G matches. (row1,col3): top row1 col3 = ., bottom row6 col3 = . => none => . Output row1 col3 = . matches. Check (row2,col2): top row2 col2 = . , bottom row7 col2 = . => none => . Output row2 col2 = . matches. (row4,col4): top row4 col4 = B, bottom row9 col4 = . => G output row4 col4 = G matches. Thus rule holds. Example2: Input top 4 rows rows1-4: B B B . . B . B . . B B B B . B Bottom rows rows6-9: row6: . . . R row7: . . . R row8: R R R R row9: R R . R Compute output given: Row1: G G G G (since any B or R). Let's test col4: top row1 col4 = ., bottom row6 col4 = R => G yes. Row2: . G . G . Let's compute: col1 top '.' bottom '.' => . matches. col2 top B bottom . => G matches. col3 top '.' bottom '.' => . matches. col4 top B bottom R => G matches. Row3: G G G G. Check col3 top B bottom R => G etc. Row4: G G . G. Let's compute col3 top '.' bottom '.'? bottom row9 col3 = . => none => . matches. Thus rule consistent. Thus transformation: Input 9x4 grid: first 4 rows = above deposit (blue), row5 = fault (yellow) ignored, last 4 rows = below deposit (red). Output 4x4 grid where each cell is G if either corresponding cell in top 4 rows or bottom 4 rows is non-blank (i.e., not '.'), else '.'. Note: In examples, top rows only contain B or . ; bottom rows only contain R or . . So rule: any non-'.' (i.e., B or R) becomes G. Now apply to test input. Test Input ... [1497 chars truncated]
"A chef layers two flatbreads—one studded with sapphire berries, one with chili flakes—separated by a ribbon of saffron. The final tasting plate reveals a fused crêpe: wherever either filling touched, a fresh herb blooms."
120b: k=2
See: Two flatbreads stacked with a saffron ribbon between them. The top bread has scattered blue filling; the bottom has scattered red filling. Gaps are plain dough.
Do: Press the breads together through the saffron ribbon. Every spot that carried any filling from either layer transforms into a single herbal garnish. Plain-on-plain spots stay bare.
Grid: A single flatbread emerges, 4×4. Garnished spots appear where either original layer had filling.
We need to understand puzzle. Input seems to be two layers? In examples, input grid appears to be 10 rows? Let's examine Example1 input: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows? Actually count: 1-4 rows of B and . (blue and black). Then row5 Y Y Y Y (yellow). Then rows6-9 with R and . (red). So total 9 rows, each 4 columns. Output is 4x4 grid of G and .? Actually output example1: G G . G G . G . G G . G G G G G That's 4 rows, 4 columns. So transformation: combine top layer (first 4 rows) and bottom layer (last 4 rows?) Wait there are 9 rows: maybe first 4 rows = top bread (blue filling), next row Y Y Y Y is the saffron ribbon (separator). Then next 4 rows = bottom bread (red filling). Indeed that matches description: two flatbreads stacked with saffron ribbon between them. So top 4 rows = layer1, bottom 4 rows = layer2, row5 is separator (yellow). Output is 4x4 grid where each cell is G (herbal garnish) if either top or bottom layer had filling (blue or red) at that position; else . (black) if both were plain (.)? Let's verify with example1. Top layer (rows1-4): Row1: B B . . Row2: B . B . Row3: B B . B Row4: B B B B Bottom layer (rows6-9): Row6: R R . R Row7: . . R . Row8: . R . . Row9: R . R . Now compute OR: For each column, if either top has B (filling) or bottom has R (filling) then output G else . Let's compute. Create 4x4 matrix. Positions (r,c): (1,1): top B, bottom row6 col1 R => filling => G (1,2): top B, bottom row6 col2 R => G (1,3): top ., bottom row6 col3 . => both plain => . (output row1 col3 is .) matches. (1,4): top ., bottom row6 col4 R => G (output G) matches. Row2: top row2 B . B . ; bottom row7 . . R . col1: top B => G (output G) col2: top . bottom . => . (output .) matches. col3: top B => G (output G) col4: top . bottom . => . (output .) matches. Row3: top row3 B B . B ; bottom row8 . R . . col1: top B => G (output G) col2: top B => G (output G) col3: top . bottom . => . (output .) col4: top B => G (output G) Row4: top row4 B B B B ; bottom row9 R . R . col1: top B => G (output G) col2: top B => G (output G) col3: top B => G (output G) col4: top B => G (output G) Matches output. So rule confirmed. Example2: Input rows: first 4 rows top layer, row5 Y Y Y Y separator, rows6-9 bottom layer. Top rows: 1: B B B . 2: . B . B 3: . . B B 4: B B . B Bottom rows (6-9): 6: . . . R 7: . . . R 8: R R R R 9: R R . R Now compute OR: produce G where top B or bottom R. Let's compute quickly to verify output. Row1: top B B B . ; bottom row6 . . . R col1: B => G (output G) col2: B => G col3: B => G col4: . top ., bottom R => G (output G) matches row1 all G. Row2: top . B . B ; bottom row7 . . . R col1: ./. => . (output .) matches row2 col1 '.'. col2: B => G (output G) col3: ./. => . (output .) col4: B top, bottom R => G (output G) matches. Row3: top . . B B ; bottom row8 R R R R col1: . top, R ... [1938 chars truncated]
"Two musicians play behind a golden curtain—one on cool-toned bells, the other on warm-toned drums. When the curtain lifts, every beat where either instrument sounded rings out in a new, harmonized timbre."
120b: k=2
See: A score split into upper and lower staves by a shimmering bar line. The upper staff has cool notes scattered across four measures; the lower staff has warm notes in different positions.
Do: Merge the two staves into one. Wherever either staff carried a note, the combined score sounds a harmonized tone. Rests persist only where both staves were silent.
Grid: One 4×4 staff of harmonized tones and rests.
We need to infer rule. The description: two staves upper and lower separated by bar line. Upper staff has cool notes (blue?) lower staff warm notes (red?). Input grid seems to be 9 rows? Let's examine example 1 input: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows, each 4 columns. Probably first 4 rows are upper staff (cool notes) using B (blue) and . (black). Then a row of Y Y Y Y maybe the bar line? Actually Y is yellow, maybe the shimmering bar line separating staves. Then lower staff rows: rows 6-9 (4 rows) with R (red) and . etc. Output is 4x4 grid of G (green) and . (black). So rule: combine upper and lower staff: wherever either staff had a note (i.e., non-blank?), output green; rests only where both were silent (i.e., both .). In example 1, upper staff notes are B (blue) maybe considered note; lower staff notes are R (red). Output G where either B or R present, else . where both . . Let's test. Take position (row1,col1): upper B, lower row6? Wait mapping: need to align rows: upper staff rows 1-4 correspond to output rows 1-4. Lower staff rows 6-9 correspond also to same rows? Probably they align: row1 of output corresponds to combination of row1 of upper and row6 of lower? Let's check. Example1: Upper row1: B B . . ; Lower row6: R R . R . Actually row6 is "R R . R". Combine: positions: col1: B and R => note => G (output row1 col1 is G). Yes. col2: B and R => G (output G). col3: . and . => both silent => . output .? Output row1 col3 is . yes. col4: . and R => note => G output G. So matches. Row2: Upper row2: B . B . ; Lower row7: ". . R ." (row7). Combine: col1 B + . => G output row2 col1 G yes. col2 . + . => . output row2 col2 .? Output row2 col2 is . (since output row2: "G . G .") yes. col3 B + R => G output G yes. col4 . + . => . output . yes. Row3: Upper row3: B B . B ; Lower row8: ". R . R". Combine: col1 B+. => G output G yes. col2 B+R => G output G yes. col3 .+. => . output .? Output row3 col3 is . yes. col4 B+R => G output G yes. Row4: Upper row4: B B B B ; Lower row9: "R . R ." combine: col1 B+R => G output G yes. col2 B+. => G output G yes. col3 B+R => G output G yes. col4 B+. => G output G yes. Thus rule confirmed. Now Example2: Input rows 1-4 upper, row5 Y line, rows6-9 lower. Upper rows: 1: B B B . 2: . B . B 3: . . B B 4: B B . B Lower rows: 6: . . . R 7: . . . R 8: R R R R 9: R R . R Combine each column. Compute output given: rows1-4 output: Row1: G G G G Row2: . G . G Row3: G G G G Row4: G G . G Let's verify. Row1 combine upper row1 with lower row6: upper B B B . ; lower . . . R col1 B+. => G matches output G. col2 B+. => G. col3 B+. => G. col4 .+R => G. Output G. Good. Row2 combine upper row2 ". B . B" with lower row7 ". . . R" col1 .+. => . output . matches. col2 B+. => G matches. col3 .+. => . matches. col4 B+R => G matches. Row3 combine upper row3 ". . B B" with lower row8 "R ... [1718 chars truncated]
"Two relay teams train on opposite halves of a field divided by a golden lane. When they combine for the final race, every position that either team had covered is claimed by the unified squad."
120b: k=1
See: A split field with a golden dividing lane. The upper half shows one team's occupied positions; the lower half shows the other team's. Empty squares are unoccupied.
Do: Merge both rosters onto one field. Any position held by at least one team is now staffed by a combined-jersey player. Only doubly-vacant spots stay open.
Grid: A single 4×4 field with combined-jersey players filling any previously occupied position.
We need to infer rule. Input appears to be two 4x4 halves stacked? In example, input shows 8 rows? Actually example input shows 9 rows? Let's count: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows, each 4 columns. Probably first 4 rows = upper half (team A) with blue B positions. Next row Y Y Y Y maybe separator? Actually description: split field with golden dividing lane. Upper half shows one team's occupied positions; lower half shows other team's. Empty squares are unoccupied. So there is a golden dividing lane maybe represented by Y (yellow). Indeed row of Y's separates halves. Then lower half rows with R (red) positions. So input: top 4 rows: B and . (blue and empty). Then a row of Y's as divider. Then bottom 4 rows: R and . (red and empty). Output: a 4x4 grid (only one field) with G (green) where either team had a piece (i.e., occupied by B or R). Empty where both empty. Indeed output shows G where any B or R present. Let's verify: For each column row of top 4 rows, combine with corresponding bottom rows (mirrored? Actually same coordinates). The bottom rows correspond to same positions relative to divider. So we need to overlay top and bottom halves onto a single 4x4 field. So output size is 4x4 (same as each half). In example, output row1: G G . G. Let's compute: top row1: B B . . ; bottom row1 (after divider) corresponds to row6? Actually bottom half rows are rows6-9? Let's map: rows after Y: rows6-9 (4 rows). Row6: R R . R ; row7: . . R . ; row8: . R . . ; row9: R . R . . Wait row9 is "R . R ." (4). So bottom row1 corresponds to row6? So overlay row1 top with row6 bottom: B B . . over R R . R => any occupied => G. So positions: col1 B and R => G; col2 B and R => G; col3 . and . => . ; col4 . and R => G. That matches output row1 G G . G. Good. Thus rule: For each cell, if either top half (blue) or bottom half (red) is occupied (non '.'), output G; else '.'. Now test input: Provided similar format. Test Input lines: B . B . B . B . . B . . B . B . Y Y Y Y R R . . . . R . . R . R R R R . Let's list top 4 rows (rows1-4): 1: B . B . 2: B . B . 3: . B . . 4: B . B . Divider row5: Y Y Y Y Bottom 4 rows rows6-9: 6: R R . . 7: . . R . 8: . R . R 9: R R R . Now overlay each corresponding row: Row1 top vs row6 bottom: Top: B . B . Bottom: R R . . Combine: col1 B or R => G col2 . or R => G (since bottom R) col3 B or . => G col4 . or . => . (both empty) So output row1: G G G . Row2 top vs row7 bottom: Top: B . B . Bottom: . . R . Combine: c1 B => G c2 . => . c3 B or R => G c4 . => . => G . G . Row3 top vs row8 bottom: Top: . B . . Bottom: . R . R Combine: c1 . . => . c2 B or R => G c3 . . => . c4 . or R => G => . G . G Row4 top vs row9 bottom: Top: B . B . Bottom: R R R . Combine: c1 B or R => G c2 . or R => G c3 B or R => G c4 . . => . => G G G . Thus output 4x4 grid rows as above. Now produce answer block with sp ... [46 chars truncated]
"Above a belt of perpetual sunshine, a cold front scatters frost crystals. Below it, a warm front deposits embers. When the sun belt dissolves, every location touched by frost or fire transforms into a spring shower."
120b: k=4
See: The sky is divided by a radiant sunband. Above: scattered frost patches against clear sky. Below: scattered ember patches against clear sky.
Do: Collapse the atmosphere. Wherever frost or embers existed, spring rain falls. Only locations that were clear in both halves remain dry.
Grid: A 4×4 sky showing rain where either front had activity, clear skies elsewhere.
We need to decode puzzle. The description: "sky divided by a radiant sunband. Above: scattered frost patches against clear sky. Below: scattered ember patches against clear sky. Collapse the atmosphere. Wherever frost or embers existed, spring rain falls. Only locations that were clear in both halves remain dry. Grid details: A 4×4 sky showing rain where either front had activity, clear skies elsewhere." Interpretation: Input grid appears to be 10 rows? Actually examples show 10 rows: first 4 rows are something (maybe blue B?), then a row of Y's, then rows of R's etc. Let's examine Example1 input: lines: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . That's 9 rows? Wait count: 4 rows of B/. pattern, then a row of Y Y Y Y, then 4 rows of R etc? Actually after Y row there are 4 rows? Let's list: Rows: 1 B B . . 2 B . B . 3 B B . B 4 B B B B 5 Y Y Y Y 6 R R . R 7 . . R . 8 . R . . 9 R . R . That's 9 rows. But description says 4x4 sky? Maybe the grid is 4 columns and 9 rows? The top half (above sunband) is first 4 rows (blue and .). The sunband row is Y Y Y Y (yellow). The bottom half is 4 rows of red and . (R). So total rows = 4 + 1 + 4 = 9. Output is 4 rows of G and . (green and .). Indeed output for example1 is 4 rows (same as top half). So transformation: take top half (blue region) and bottom half (red region) combine: wherever either top half had a B (blue) or bottom half had R (red) at same column position (i.e., same column index) produce G (green) in output; else if both were '.' (black) produce '.'. But need to verify with examples. We need to map coordinates: The top half is 4 rows, each 4 columns. Bottom half also 4 rows, each 4 columns. The output is 4 rows, 4 columns. So rule: For each column (and row) position (i,j) where i from 0..3 (row index), we look at top half row i (same column) and bottom half row i (maybe row i+5? Actually bottom half rows correspond to rows after the Y row, but there are 4 rows. So mapping: top row i corresponds to bottom row i (same relative position). So combine. Now we need to see mapping of colors: top half uses B (blue) and '.' (black). bottom half uses R (red) and '.' (black). Output uses G (green) where either top had B or bottom had R (or both). Output '.' where both were '.'. Check Example1: Let's compute. Top rows: 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B Bottom rows (rows 6-9): 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . Now compute per position: Row1 col1: top B, bottom R => G (yes output G) col2: B,R => G col3: ., . => . (output .) col4: ., R => G (output G). Output row1: G G . G matches. Row2: top B . B . ; bottom . . R . (row7). Wait bottom row2 corresponds to row7? Actually row index 2 (0-based) corresponds to bottom row2 (row7). Row7: . . R . . So compute: col1: B vs . => G (output G) col2: . vs . => . (output .) col3: B vs R => G (output G) col4: . vs . => . (output .) Output row2: G . G . matches. Row3: top row3 B B . B ... [2423 chars truncated]
"An architect overlays two translucent blueprints—one drawn in cool ink, the other in warm—against a golden lightbox. Wherever either blueprint shows a wall, the final plan marks a standing structure in a new color."
120b: k=1
See: Two blueprint transparencies pinned above and below a golden lamp strip. Each has walls and open spaces in a 4×4 layout.
Do: Stack the transparencies on the lightbox. Any cell where at least one blueprint drew a wall becomes a built structure in the final plan. Only mutually open cells stay as open floor.
Grid: A single 4×4 floor plan with structures wherever either blueprint had a wall.
We need to understand puzzle. Input seems to have two 4x4 grids stacked? In example, input lines: first 4 lines are B B . . etc (blue and .). Then next 4 lines Y Y Y Y etc (yellow). Then next 4 lines R R . R etc (red). Then next 4 lines . . R . etc? Wait example input shows many lines: Let's count. Example 1 Input: B B . . B . B . B B . B B B B B Y Y Y Y R R . R . . R . . R . . R . R . Output: 4x4 grid of G and . etc. So input appears to be three 4x4 grids? Actually there are 9 lines before output. Let's list them: 1: B B . . 2: B . B . 3: B B . B 4: B B B B 5: Y Y Y Y 6: R R . R 7: . . R . 8: . R . . 9: R . R . That's 9 rows. Maybe the format: first 4 rows = top transparency (blue). Next 4 rows = bottom transparency (yellow?) but there are 9 rows, not 8. Wait maybe there are two transparencies each 4x4, but they are interleaved? Actually description: "Two blueprint transparencies pinned above and below a golden lamp strip. Each has walls and open spaces in a 4×4 layout." So each transparency is 4x4. The golden lamp strip maybe a row of Y (yellow) representing the lamp? In input we see a row of Y Y Y Y (row5). That could be the lamp strip separating the two transparencies. So first 4 rows = top blueprint (blue B and .). Row5 = Y row (lamp). Then rows6-9 = bottom blueprint (red R and .). Indeed rows6-9 are 4 rows: R R . R ; . . R . ; . R . . ; R . R . That's bottom blueprint. Thus transformation: combine top and bottom blue/red walls: any cell where at least one blueprint has a wall (i.e., not .) becomes built structure (green G). Only mutually open cells (both .) stay open floor (.)? In output we see G and . only. Indeed output 4x4 grid: G G . G ; G . G . ; G G . G ; G G G G. Let's verify with top blueprint (B) and bottom (R). Let's compute OR: For each position, if top has B (wall) or bottom has R (wall) => G else . . Let's test first cell (row1 col1): top B, bottom row6 col1 = R => wall => G. Output G matches. Row1 col3: top . (since row1: B B . .) col3 is . ; bottom row6 col3 = .? row6 is R R . R, col3 '.' . So both open => output should be . . Indeed output row1 col3 is '.' . Good. Row2 col2: top row2: B . B . => col2 '.' ; bottom row7: . . R . => col2 '.' ; both open => output '.'? Output row2 col2 is '.' yes. Row2 col3: top B, bottom row7 col3 = R => wall => G output G. Works. Thus rule: output is 4x4 grid where each cell is G if either top (blue) or bottom (red) cell is not '.' (i.e., is a wall), else '.'. Now test input: Provided after description. Test Input: B . B . B . B . . B . . B . B . Y Y Y Y R R . . . . R . . R . R R R R . Let's parse. Top blueprint rows 1-4: 1: B . B . 2: B . B . 3: . B . . 4: B . B . Bottom blueprint rows 6-9: 6: R R . . 7: . . R . 8: . R . R 9: R R R . Now compute OR. We'll create 4x4 grid. I'll index rows 1-4. Row1 top: B . B . Bottom row6: R R . . Combine: cell1 top B (wall) => G. cell2 top . bottom R => G. cell3 top B => G. cell4 top . bottom . => bo ... [894 chars truncated]
"Two signal corps—one using cold flares, one using hot flares—communicate across a golden no-man's-land. Intelligence merges both maps: every position that either corps flagged becomes a confirmed target on the consolidated battle map."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two tactical maps separated by a golden demarcation line. Each map marks positions with its signature flare color against dark terrain.
Do: Overlay both maps. Any position flagged by either corps is marked as confirmed on the unified map in a new indicator color. Unflagged-by-both positions remain dark.
Grid: One 4×4 consolidated map with confirmed markers where either corps reported activity.
"Two shadow-puppet troupes perform behind opposite sides of a golden scrim. One casts cool silhouettes, the other warm. When the scrim is removed, every spot where either troupe cast a shadow glows under a unified spotlight."
120b: k=1
See: A stage divided by a golden scrim. Above: cool-toned shadow puppets in various positions. Below: warm-toned shadow puppets in other positions. Dark where no puppet appears.
Do: Remove the scrim and merge the performances. Wherever either troupe cast a shadow, a unified spotlight illuminates that spot in a new color. Only doubly-dark areas stay unlit.
Grid: A 4×4 stage with spotlit positions wherever either troupe performed.
We need to infer rule. Input seems to be two 4x4 quadrants? Actually description: stage divided by golden scrim (maybe a horizontal line). Above: cool-toned shadow puppets (blue and maybe other cool colors). Below: warm-toned (red, yellow). Dark where no puppet appears (black '.' maybe). Output: unified spotlight where either troupe cast a shadow, new color (green). Only doubly-dark areas stay unlit (i.e., where both above and below are black?). Look at example 1. Input given as 9 lines? Let's parse. Example 1 Input lines: "B B . ." "B . B ." "B B . B" "B B B B" "Y Y Y Y" "R R . R" ". . R ." ". R . ." "R . R ." That's 9 rows, each 4 columns. So stage divided by a golden scrim maybe a horizontal line separating top 4 rows (cool) and bottom 5 rows (warm). Indeed first 4 rows have B and . (blue and black). Next rows have Y, R, etc (yellow and red). Output is 4x4 grid (only top part?) Output lines: "G G . G" "G . G ." "G G . G" "G G G G" That's 4 rows, 4 columns. So output corresponds to the top 4 rows? Actually output size matches the top part (cool side). So rule: combine the two halves (above and below) into a single 4x4 grid where each cell is green if either half had a non-black (i.e., colored) cell? Let's test. We need to map bottom part (5 rows) onto top 4 rows? How? Maybe the bottom part is shifted? Let's align columns? The bottom part has 5 rows, but we need 4 rows output. Perhaps we overlay bottom onto top by ignoring the scrim line (maybe the line is between row4 and row5). So we have two 4x4 quadrants: top-left 4x4 (rows1-4, cols1-4) is cool side. Bottom-left? Actually bottom side also 4x4? But there are 5 rows of warm side, maybe the first row of warm side is the scrim? Wait description: golden scrim dividing stage. Could be a vertical line? But they said stage divided by golden scrim, above and below. So horizontal division. So maybe the warm side is also 4 rows, but they gave 5 rows because includes a row of Y (yellow) which maybe is the scrim? Actually Y Y Y Y row maybe the scrim (golden). But Y is yellow, not gold. But maybe Y stands for yellow representing the scrim? The description says golden scrim, but color key includes Y=yellow. So maybe the scrim is represented by Y row. So top 4 rows are blue and black (cool). Then a row of Y (scrim). Then bottom 4 rows are red and black (warm). That matches total 9 rows: 4 + 1 + 4 =9. Indeed after Y row we have 4 rows of R and . etc. Let's check: rows after Y row: "R R . R" ". . R ." ". R . ." "R . R ." That's 4 rows. Yes. So the transformation: remove the scrim (Y row) and merge the two 4x4 halves (top and bottom) into a single 4x4 output where each cell is green if either top or bottom cell is colored (i.e., not black). If both are black (.) then output is . (black). In example output, we see green where either side had B or R. Let's verify with a cell. Take column1 row1: top cell B, bottom cell R (row1 of bottom corresponds to row5? Actually bottom row1 corresponds to row6 overall) ... [1956 chars truncated]
"A gardener tends two raised beds separated by a row of golden marigolds. One bed has cool-season seedlings, the other warm-season starts. Come transplant day, a single bed is planted wherever either season had something growing."
120b: k=1
See: Two planting beds flanking a golden marigold border. Each bed has seedlings in some cells and bare soil in others.
Do: Consolidate into one bed. Any cell that held a seedling in either bed is planted with a hybrid cultivar. Only cells bare in both beds remain as empty soil.
Grid: A single 4×4 bed with hybrid plants where either original bed had seedlings.
We need to understand puzzle. Input seems to have multiple rows? In example, Input shows many rows: first 4 rows maybe bed1? Then Y Y Y Y line? Then R R . R etc. Let's parse. Metaphor: Two planting beds flanking a golden marigold border. Each bed has seedlings in some cells and bare soil in others. Consolidate into one bed. Any cell that held a seedling in either bed is planted with a hybrid cultivar. Only cells bare in both beds remain as empty soil. Grid details: A single 4×4 bed with hybrid plants where either original bed had seedlings. Thus we have two 4x4 beds separated by a border row of Y (golden marigold). So input grid consists of 4 rows (top bed), then a row of Y's (border), then 4 rows (bottom bed). Output is a 4x4 grid (single bed) where each cell is G (green) if either top or bottom had a seed (non-blank) else . (black). In example, output shows G and . only. In example input, top 4 rows are B and . pattern. Bottom 4 rows are R and . pattern. The Y row separates. We need to see mapping: In example, output G where either top or bottom had a B or R (i.e., any non-blank). Let's verify. Example Input top rows: Row1: B B . . Row2: B . B . Row3: B B . B Row4: B B B B Bottom rows after Y row: Row6? Actually after Y row: R R . R Row7: . . R . Row8: . R . . Row9: R . R . Now compute OR: For each column, if top or bottom has B or R (non-.) then output G else . Let's compute 4x4. Top matrix T: t11 B, t12 B, t13 ., t14 . t21 B, t22 ., t23 B, t24 . t31 B, t32 B, t33 ., t34 B t41 B, t42 B, t43 B, t44 B Bottom matrix Btm: b11 R, b12 R, b13 ., b14 R b21 ., b22 ., b23 R, b24 . b31 ., b32 R, b33 ., b34 . b41 R, b42 ., b43 R, b44 . Now OR: cell (1,1): B or R => G. (1,2): B or R => G. (1,3): . and . => . (1,4): . and R => G. Output row1: G G . G matches. Row2: (2,1) B or . => G. (2,2) . or . => . . (2,3) B or R => G. (2,4) . or . => . Output row2: G . G . matches. Row3: (3,1) B or . => G. (3,2) B or R => G. (3,3) . or . => . (3,4) B or . => G. Output row3: G G . G matches. Row4: (4,1) B or R => G. (4,2) B or . => G. (4,3) B or R => G. (4,4) B or . => G. Output row4: G G G G matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input: Given: B . B . B . B . . B . . B . B . Y Y Y Y R R . . . . R . . R . R R R R . Let's parse top 4 rows (rows1-4): Row1: B . B . Row2: B . B . Row3: . B . . Row4: B . B . Bottom 4 rows (rows6-9): Row6: R R . . Row7: . . R . Row8: . R . R Row9: R R R . Now compute OR: For each of 4 columns. I'll create table. Top rows T: t11 B, t12 ., t13 B, t14 . t21 B, t22 ., t23 B, t24 . t31 ., t32 B, t33 ., t34 . t41 B, t42 ., t43 B, t44 . Bottom rows Btm: b11 R, b12 R, b13 ., b14 . b21 ., b22 ., b23 R, b24 . b31 ., b32 R, b33 ., b34 R b41 R, b42 R, b43 R, b44 . Now OR per cell: Row1: c1: B or R => G c2: . or R => G c3: B or . => G c4: . or . => . (both .) => . Row2: c1: B or . => G c2: . or . => . c3: B or R => G c4: . or . => . Row3: c1: . or . ... [359 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 4×14 grid containing three 4×4 panels separated by two vertical columns of red (R) cells. The left panel contains yellow (Y) cells and black (.) cells. The middle panel contains maroon (W) cells and black (.) cells. The right panel contains blue (B) cells and black (.) cells. Each panel represents a layer of colored positions against a black background.
Do: Extract the three 4×4 panels by removing the two red divider columns. Overlay the three panels into a single 4×4 output grid using the following priority: yellow (Y) takes highest priority, then maroon (W), then blue (B), then black (.). For each cell position, check the left panel first — if it contains Y, the output is Y. If the left panel is black at that position, check the middle panel — if it contains W, the output is W. If both the left and middle panels are black, check the right panel — if it contains B, the output is B. If all three panels are black at that position, the output is black (.).
Grid: The input grid is 4 rows by 14 columns. It consists of three 4×4 content panels separated by two 4×1 columns of red (R) cells at columns 4 and 9. The output grid is 4×4. Colors used are yellow (Y), maroon (W), blue (B), red (R) as dividers, and black (.) as background.
"Three stained glass windows shine through each other, and the brightest light wins."
120b: k=2
See: A triptych of stained glass windows is mounted in a cathedral wall, separated by pillars of red stone. The left window glows with golden sunlight (Y), the center with a deep wine-colored warmth (W), and the right with a cool blue moonlight (B). Where the glass is clear (.), no light passes through at all.
Do: Remove the red stone pillars and stack the three windows one behind the other, letting light shine through. Golden sunlight is the most powerful — wherever it streams through the left window, it dominates. Where the golden pane is clear, the wine-colored warmth from the middle window seeps through instead. Only where both the gold and wine panes are clear can the blue moonlight from the farthest window reach the viewer. Where all three windows are clear glass, only darkness remains.
Grid: The cathedral wall holds three square panes of equal size, braced apart by two narrow columns of red stone. Each pane is a mosaic of colored and clear tiles. When the pillars are removed and the panes are layered, the congregation sees a single window where the nearest light always outshines the farther ones.
We need to infer rule. The description: three windows side by side separated by red pillars (R columns). Input grid contains three panes separated by columns of R? Let's examine example1 input dimensions. Input lines: appears 4 rows? Actually given as space-separated? Let's reconstruct. Example1 Input lines (maybe 4 rows, each row length 15?). Let's write rows: Row1: . . . Y R . . . W R . . . . Row2: Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . . Row3: Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B Row4: . Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B So 4 rows, 15 columns. There are two red columns (R) acting as pillars separating three windows each of width? Let's locate R columns: column indices (0-based). Row1: positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 Y,4 R,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 W,9 R,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 ?. Actually row1 length 15, last char maybe . . Let's count: given ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 15 entries: indices 0-14. So R at index4 and index9. So windows: columns 0-3 (left window width 4), columns5-8 (center window width 4), columns10-14 (right window width5?). Wait after second R at index9, remaining columns 10-14 =5 columns. But maybe right window also width 4 but extra column? Let's check other rows: Row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." also 15 entries, R at 4 and 9. After second R, columns10-14 =5 entries: . . . . ?. Actually row2 after R at 9, we have ". . . ."? Let's list: Row2 entries: 0 Y,1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 R,5 W,6 .,7 W,8 .,9 R,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 ?. Wait there are 15 entries, last maybe . . Let's count: given "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." that's 15: after R at 9, we have . (10), . (11), . (12), . (13), . (14). So right window width 5 columns of all '.' in this row. Row3: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" 15 entries, R at 4 and 9. Right side columns10-14: B B . B (that's 4 entries) but we need 5 columns; maybe column10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B,14 ??? Actually there are 5 entries after index9: B (10), B (11), . (12), B (13). That's only 4. Wait maybe missing one at end? The row ends with B, so maybe there are 5 entries: B (10), B (11), . (12), B (13), (nothing). Let's recount: row3 tokens: Y(0) .(1) Y(2) Y(3) R(4) .(5) W(6) W(7) .(8) R(9) B(10) B(11) .(12) B(13). That's 14 tokens, not 15. Maybe there is missing token at end? The given row: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" that's 14 tokens. So maybe the grid is 4x14? Let's check row1 tokens count: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 14? Count: .0, .1, .2, Y3, R4, .5, .6, .7, W8, R9, .10, .11, .12, .13. That's 14 tokens. So grid width 14. Good. So windows: left width 4 (cols0-3), middle width 4 (5-8), right width 4 (10-13). The red pillars at col4 and col9 separate. So each pane is 4x4. Thus transformation: we have three 4x4 windows. Need to stack them: nearest (left) overrides, then middle, then right, with priority: Y > W > B > .? Actually description: golden (Y) most powerful, where gold present dominates. Where gold clear (i.e., .) then wine (W) from middle shows. Only where both gold and wine clear can blue (B) from farthest show. Where all three ... [4633 chars truncated]
"Three genes compete for expression in the same tissue, and dominance determines which phenotype shows."
120b: fail
See: A chromosome with three coding regions separated by silent introns. The first region glows gold, the second bruises dark, and the third pulses faintly blue — all against inert junk DNA.
Do: Splice out the introns and let the three genes fight for expression in the same cell. The golden allele is fully dominant, the dark one is intermediate, and the blue one is recessive. Only the most dominant trait that's present at each locus gets expressed.
Grid: The chromosome shrinks to just one gene's length once the introns are removed. Each locus displays whichever competing allele dominates.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are larger, output smaller. Example 1: Input dimensions? Let's count rows. Input lines: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 15 columns? Let's count: tokens: .(1) .2 .3 Y4 R5 .6 .7 .8 W9 R10 .11 .12 .13 .14? Actually there are 15? Let's count precisely: tokens: . , . , . , Y , R , . , . , . , W , R , . , . , . , . , ?. Wait there are 15 tokens maybe last is . . Let's recount: string: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." That's 15 tokens: positions 1-15. Good. Second row: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." also 15. Third row: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" also 15. Fourth row: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B" also 15. So input 4x15. Output grid: 4 rows, 4 columns: ". . . Y", "Y Y W Y", "Y W Y Y", "B Y Y Y". So output 4x4. Thus transformation reduces width from 15 to 4. Likely each column corresponds to a "locus" after splicing introns (non-coding). The description: three coding regions separated by silent introns. So input contains three gene regions (gold, dark, blue) separated by introns (junk). The output is a single gene length (maybe number of loci equals number of columns in each coding region). The three genes fight for expression: golden allele fully dominant, dark intermediate, blue recessive. Only most dominant trait present at each locus gets expressed. Thus we need to identify three coding regions in input: first region (gold) maybe represented by Y (yellow) as gold? Actually gold allele maybe Y (yellow). Dark allele maybe R (red) or B (blue?) Wait dark could be "bruise dark" maybe B (blue) or R (red). Blue allele is faintly blue (maybe B). But description: first region glows gold, second bruises dark, third pulses faintly blue. So colors: gold = Y (yellow). Dark = maybe R (red) or maybe something else like maroon? But dark could be R (red) as "bruise dark". Blue = B (blue). In example, output includes Y, W, B. W is maroon? Actually W is maroon per key. But output includes W (maroon) which is not Y or B. Hmm. Let's examine example to deduce mapping. We need to locate three coding regions in input. Possibly each region is a vertical slice of columns? Introns are columns of '.' (black) maybe? Let's look at input columns: we have many '.' and other colors. Maybe introns are columns where all rows are '.'? Let's check column by column. I'll write columns 1-15 with rows: Row1: . . . Y R . . . W R . . . . Row2: Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . . Row3: Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B Row4: . Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B Now column wise: 1: row1 ., row2 Y, row3 Y, row4 . => not all '.'. 2: . , Y , . , Y => not all '.'. 3: . , . , Y , Y => not all '.'. 4: Y , Y , Y , Y => all Y. 5: R , R , R , R => all R. 6: . , W , . , . => mix. 7: . , . , W , W? Wait row4 column7 is W? row4 col7 is W (since row4: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B": columns: 1 .,2 Y,3 Y,4 Y,5 R,6 .,7 W,8 .,9 .,10 R,11 B,12 B,13 B,14 B,15 ? maybe missing? Actually row4 has 15 tokens, last is ?. Let's recount row4 tokens: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B ... [11526 chars truncated]
"Three nebulae drift into alignment and the brightest emission overwhelms the others at each pixel of the telescope."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A wide-field image showing three nebular regions separated by bands of red-shifted hydrogen. The first nebula glows gold, the second smolders in dark hues, and the third shimmers faintly blue — all against the void.
Do: Filter out the hydrogen bands and stack the three regions into a single deep-field composite. At each pixel, the golden emission saturates the sensor first; the dark nebula registers only where gold is absent; the blue glow appears only where both brighter sources are dark.
Grid: The final image is a compact square where each pixel shows whichever nebula's light was most luminous.
"Three tidal charts overlap at the same harbor, and the strongest current dictates flow at each mooring."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A long nautical chart showing three harbor zones separated by breakwaters marked in red. Gold currents swirl in the first zone, dark undertows pull in the second, and blue eddies circle in the third — each against still water.
Do: Remove the breakwater markings and let the three zones flood into one compact harbor. Gold currents overpower anything beneath them. Dark undertows assert themselves where gold water is still. Blue eddies only form where both stronger currents are absent.
Grid: A single small harbor chart where each mooring point shows whichever current was most powerful.
"Three circuit layers are etched on the same board, and the highest-voltage trace burns through at each junction."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A wide circuit board with three trace regions separated by red power rails. Gold traces carry high voltage on the left, dark traces carry medium voltage in the center, and blue traces carry low voltage on the right — each against bare substrate.
Do: Remove the power rail dividers and collapse all three layers onto one compact board. At each junction, the gold high-voltage trace dominates. The dark medium trace connects only where gold is absent. The blue low trace only appears where both higher traces left bare substrate.
Grid: A single compact PCB where each junction carries whichever trace had the highest voltage.
"Three pantheons claim the same mortal realm, and divine rank settles who rules each sacred site."
120b: fail
See: A sprawling realm divided into three divine territories by rivers of fire. Golden gods inhabit the first territory, shadowed demigods the second, and blue spirits the third — each dwelling at scattered shrines against empty land.
Do: The fire rivers dry up and the three territories collapse into one contested realm. Gods claim any shrine they occupied. Demigods hold sites the gods ignored. Spirits haunt only those places left untouched by both higher orders.
Grid: A single compact realm where each shrine serves whichever divine being held the highest rank.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid larger, output smaller 4x4. Need to see mapping. Example1 Input (let's write coordinates). Input appears 4 rows? Actually given lines with spaces. Let's count columns. Row1: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 15 cells. Row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." also 15. Row3: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" 15. Row4: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B" 15. Output 4x4: ". . . Y" "Y Y W Y" "Y W Y Y" "B Y Y Y" So output is 4x4 derived from 4x15 input. Likely each column group of 3? maybe collapse three territories into one. The metaphor: three territories separated by rivers of fire. Fire rivers maybe represented by R (red). So red columns separate territories. In input, there are vertical lines of R? Let's examine columns: column indices 1-15. Let's list column values per row. I'll index 1..15. Row1: 1 . ,2 . ,3 . ,4 Y ,5 R ,6 . ,7 . ,8 . ,9 W ,10 R ,11 . ,12 . ,13 . ,14 . ,15 . Row2: 1 Y ,2 Y ,3 . ,4 Y ,5 R ,6 W ,7 . ,8 W ,9 . ,10 R ,11 . ,12 . ,13 . ,14 . ,15 . Row3: 1 Y ,2 . ,3 Y ,4 Y ,5 R ,6 . ,7 W ,8 W ,9 . ,10 R ,11 B ,12 B ,13 . ,14 B Row4: 1 . ,2 Y ,3 Y ,4 Y ,5 R ,6 . ,7 W ,8 . ,9 . ,10 R ,11 B ,12 B ,13 B ,14 B ,15 B? Wait row4 has 15 entries: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B" that's 14? Let's count: .(1) Y2 Y3 Y4 R5 .6 W7 .8 .9 R10 B11 B12 B13 B14 .? Actually there are 14? Let's recount: string: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B". That's 14 tokens. maybe missing one at end? But output 4x4 suggests we consider groups between Rs (fire rivers). The Rs are at column5 and column10 maybe act as separators. So three territories: columns 1-4 (left of first R), columns 6-9 (between Rs), columns 11-15 (right of second R). Indeed each territory width 4,4,5? Actually after second R, columns 11-15 = 5 columns. But output is 4 columns, maybe they collapse each territory into one column by some rule (e.g., majority color per column across rows). Let's test: For each territory, we need to produce a column in output? Output width 4 suggests maybe each territory yields one column, plus maybe something else. Wait output 4 columns, but there are 3 territories. So maybe also include something else like the river columns become something? Let's examine output columns vs input. Output rows 4, columns 4. Let's compute for each row, maybe they take the "shrines" (non-empty?) within each territory? The metaphor: shrines are scattered against empty land. Colors other than '.' maybe represent shrines. The three divine orders: golden gods (maybe Y? gold/yellow), shadowed demigods (maybe B? blue? but blue is B, but demigods maybe magenta? Not sure). Blue spirits (maybe W? maroon? Actually W is grey? Wait color key: X=grey, M=magenta, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon. So W is maroon (maybe blue? Not). But maybe colors correspond: golden gods = Y (yellow). shadowed demigods = B (blue). blue spirits = W (maroon?) Not matching. But maybe mapping: gold=Y, demigods=R? but R is fire river. Hmm. Let's analyze output: first row ". . . Y". That matc ... [10060 chars truncated]
"Three dance troupes rehearse on a triptych floor, and the prima claims every mark she touches when the panels fold together."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A wide dance floor split into three panels by ribbons of scarlet. The prima ballerinas trace golden paths on the left, the soloists step in dark shoes through the center, and the corps de ballet marks blue positions on the right — each against empty floor.
Do: Fold the scarlet ribbons away and compress the three panels into one intimate stage. Wherever a prima stood, her mark holds. A soloist's position survives only where no prima claimed the spot. The corps fills in only what both others left bare.
Grid: A single compact floor plan where each mark belongs to whichever dancer held the highest rank in the company.
"Three mineral veins are compressed into one stratum, and the hardest crystal wins each pocket in the rock."
120b: k=3
See: A wide cross-section of bedrock showing three mineral zones separated by seams of red jasper. Gold ore fills pockets in the first zone, darkite in the second, and blue chalcedony in the third — each embedded in empty matrix stone.
Do: The jasper seams erode away and tectonic pressure crushes the three zones into one thin stratum. Gold ore, being hardest, fills any pocket it occupies. Dark mineral claims spaces where gold is absent. Blue chalcedony crystallizes only in pockets both harder minerals left vacant.
Grid: A single compressed stratum where each pocket holds whichever mineral was hardest on the Mohs scale.
We need to infer rule. The metaphor: three mineral zones separated by red jasper seams (R). Gold ore (hardest) fills pockets in first zone, darkite (second) (maybe second hardest), blue chalcedony (third) (softest). After erosion of jasper seams and crushing zones into one thin stratum, each pocket holds whichever mineral was hardest on Mohs scale. Interpretation: Input grid contains multiple rows, with R acting as separators (seams). Within each zone (between R columns?), there are pockets of Y, B, W etc? Actually colors: Y=yellow, B=blue, W=maroon (maybe representing gold, darkite, blue chalcedony?). Need mapping: Hardness order: gold hardest, then dark mineral, then blue chalcedony softest. So after compression, each column (or maybe each cell) gets the hardest mineral present among the zones at that position (ignoring R). So we overlay zones: For each column, look at cells in each zone (i.e., rows?) Actually zones are vertical? The description: "wide cross-section of bedrock showing three mineral zones separated by seams of red jasper." So imagine three horizontal zones stacked vertically, separated by rows of R? In grid, R appears as vertical lines? Let's examine example 1. Input example1 grid size? Let's write rows: Row1: . . . Y R . . . W R . . . . Row2: Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . . Row3: Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B Row4: . Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B So there are 4 rows, many columns. R appears at column5 and column10? Let's count: columns: 1 .;2 .;3 .;4 Y;5 R;6 .;7 .;8 .;9 W;10 R;11 .;12 .;13 .;14 . . So R at col5 and col10. So there are three zones: columns 1-4 (zone1), columns6-9 (zone2), columns11-14 (zone3). Within each zone, there are other colors: Y, W, B, etc. Output grid is 4 rows, 4 columns: . . . Y / Y Y W Y / Y W Y Y / B Y Y Y So output columns correspond to the three zones compressed into one stratum? Actually output width is 4 columns, which matches the width of each zone (zone width = 4). So they collapsed the three zones side by side into one zone of width 4, where each column corresponds to the same column index within each zone? Wait zone width is 4 columns (1-4,6-9,11-14). So they overlay the three zones: for each row, for each position within zone (i.e., column offset 1-4), we have three values (from each zone). The rule: choose the hardest mineral among those three (ignoring R). Hardness ranking: gold (maybe Y?), darkite (maybe B?), blue chalcedony (maybe W?). Need to map colors to hardness. Look at output row1: . . . Y. Input row1 zone1 columns1-4: . . . Y. zone2 columns6-9: . . . W. zone3 columns11-14: . . . . . Actually row1 col11-14 are . . . . . So for each offset: Offset1 (col1,6,11): values: '.' , '.' , '.' => output '.' (makes sense) Offset2 (col2,7,12): '.' , '.' , '.' => '.' Offset3 (col3,8,13): '.' , '.' , '.' => '.' Offset4 (col4,9,14): Y , W , '.' => output Y. So Y beats W? Y is gold (hardest). So Y chosen. Row2 output: Y Y W Y. Input row2 zone1 cols1-4: Y Y . Y. zone2 cols6-9: W . W .? ... [6083 chars truncated]
"Three sauces are layered over the same dish, and only the richest flavor survives at each bite."
120b: k=1
See: A long plating board divided into three seasoning stations by strips of hot pepper. Gold butter sauce on the left, dark reduction in the middle, berry coulis on the right — each dabbed onto a grid of tasting portions.
Do: Remove the pepper dividers and stack all three sauces onto one small plate. Where butter was spooned, its richness overpowers everything beneath. Where only reduction was placed, it dominates the berry. The coulis only shines through where the plate was otherwise bare.
Grid: The final plate is a single small square where each bite carries whichever sauce was most assertive at that spot.
We need to infer rule. Input description: long plating board divided into three seasoning stations by strips of hot pepper. So input grid likely consists of three vertical sections separated by a column of a specific color representing pepper. In example, we need to see input and output. Example 1 Input: they show as rows with spaces? Let's rewrite. Input rows (maybe 4 rows? Actually they show many columns). Let's count columns. Row1: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." That's 14 entries. Row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." Row3: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" Row4: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B" Output is 4x4 grid: ". . . Y" "Y Y W Y" "Y W Y Y" "B Y Y Y" So transformation reduces width from 14 to 4. Likely three sections (left, middle, right) each of width maybe 4? plus separators? Let's examine. If there are three stations separated by pepper strips. Pepper maybe represented by a specific color, maybe black '.'? But '.' is black. However pepper strips maybe a column of a distinct color like 'R' red? Not sure. Let's try to segment input columns into three groups of equal width? 14 columns maybe 4+1+4+1+4 =14 (two separators). So three sections of width 4 each, separated by single column of pepper (maybe column of something). Let's test. Take columns indices 0-13. We need to identify separator columns: maybe column 4? Let's list column values per row. I'll write rows as arrays: Row1: [0] . ,1 . ,2 . ,3 Y ,4 R ,5 . ,6 . ,7 . ,8 W ,9 R ,10 . ,11 . ,12 . ,13 . Row2: Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . . Row3: Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B Row4: . Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B Now look for a column that is consistent across rows maybe representing pepper. Column 4 is R in all rows? Row1 col4 = R, row2 col4 = R, row3 col4 = R, row4 col4 = R. So column 4 is all R (red). Could be pepper strip. Next possible separator column maybe after middle section: column 9? Row1 col9 = R, row2 col9 = R, row3 col9 = R, row4 col9 = R. Yes column 9 all R. So two pepper columns at 4 and 9 (both red). So three sections: columns 0-3 (left), 5-8 (middle), 10-13 (right). Each width 4. Now output 4x4 grid likely result of stacking sauces: left sauce (butter) over middle reduction over right coulis? Actually description: left butter over everything beneath, middle reduction dominates berry, coulis only shines where plate otherwise bare. So rule: For each cell position (row, col) within the 4x4 output, we look at the three corresponding cells from the three sections (same row, same relative column). Determine which color wins based on hierarchy: left (first) overrides others, then middle overrides right, else right if others are blank? But also blank (black '.'?) maybe considered empty. Let's test with example to see if output matches. Take position (row0, col0) relative within sections: left section column0 row0 = '.' (black). middle section column5 row0 = '.' . right section column10 row0 = '.' . So all '.' => output '.' (matches output row0 col0 '.') Row0 col1: left col1 '.' ; ... [5068 chars truncated]
"Three instrument sections rehearse separately, and the loudest voice claims each beat in the final score."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A long musical staff divided into three rehearsal rooms by walls of percussion. Brass fills the first room, strings hum in the second, and woodwinds whisper in the third — each playing their part against silence.
Do: Tear down the percussion walls and merge the three rooms into one ensemble. At each beat, the brass plays over everything, the strings fill in where brass rests, and the woodwinds only sound where both others are silent.
Grid: The final score is one compact arrangement where each beat belongs to whichever section's voice carried farthest.
"Three relay teams pass through the same lane, and the fastest runner at each checkpoint holds the baton."
120b: k=4
See: A long track with three zones separated by hurdle barriers. Gold jerseys sprint through the first zone, dark uniforms through the second, and blue kits through the third — some lanes occupied, some empty.
Do: Collapse the hurdle barriers and overlay every zone onto a single stretch. At each position, the gold runner claims the spot if present; otherwise the dark uniform holds it; otherwise the blue kit stands there. Empty positions stay vacant.
Grid: One short stretch of track where each position is held by whichever team's runner arrived with the highest rank.
We need to infer rule. From description: three zones separated by hurdle barriers. Gold jerseys (maybe Y? gold = yellow) first zone, dark uniforms second (maybe R? red?), blue kits third (maybe B? blue). At each position, gold runner claims if present; else dark; else blue. Empty stays vacant. So input grid seems to have three zones horizontally? Let's examine example1 input dimensions: appears 4 rows, 15 columns? Actually lines: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 15 entries. Output is 4x4. So they collapsed zones into one stretch of length 4 (maybe number of zones?). How? Let's see mapping. We need to identify zones: maybe separated by R (red) as barrier? In description: hurdle barriers separate zones. In inputs, there is a column of R? Let's examine example1 rows: each row has pattern ... Y R ... W R ... etc. There are multiple R's. Perhaps the barrier is column of R's? Let's locate positions of R in each row: row1: column4? Actually indices: 0 . 1 . 2 . 3 Y 4 R 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 W 9 R 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 ?. Wait row length 15, there is R at col4 and col9. So two R's maybe barriers dividing three zones: zone1 columns 0-3 (before first R), zone2 columns 5-8 (between R's), zone3 columns 10-14 (after second R). Output width 4 corresponds to number of columns in each zone? Let's check zone widths: zone1 length 4 (cols0-3). zone2 length 4 (cols5-8). zone3 length 5 (cols10-14) actually 5. But output width 4, maybe they take min width? Let's examine output row1: ". . . Y". That's 4 columns. So they collapsed each zone's column into one column? Wait maybe they overlay zones: for each position index within zone (relative), they overlay three zones: gold (Y) from zone1, dark (R?) from zone2, blue (B) from zone3. But they said gold runner claims if present; else dark; else blue. So we need to take for each column index (0..zone_width-1) look at three zones' cells at that relative position, choose Y if any, else R, else B, else . (empty). That would produce output width equal to zone width (maybe the smallest zone width). In example1 zone widths: zone1 4, zone2 4, zone3 5. So output width 4 matches min zone width (4). They ignore extra column in zone3? Let's test with data. Let's extract zone1 (cols0-3) rows: Row1: . . . Y Row2: Y Y . Y Row3: Y . Y Y Row4: . Y Y Y Zone2 (cols5-8) rows (col5-8 inclusive? Actually after first R at col4, zone2 starts col5 up to before second R at col9 exclusive? So cols5-8 (4 columns). Let's extract: Row1 cols5-8: . . . W (col5 .,6 .,7 .,8 W) Row2: . . . .? Wait row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R B B . B" Let's index: 0 Y,1 Y,2 .,3 Y,4 R,5 W,6 .,7 W,8 .,9 R,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B. So cols5-8: 5 W,6 .,7 W,8 . => W . W . Row3: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B": indices:0 Y,1 .,2 Y,3 Y,4 R,5 .,6 W,7 W,8 .,9 R,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 B. cols5-8: 5 .,6 W,7 W,8 . => . W W . Row4: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B": indices:0 .,1 Y,2 Y,3 Y,4 R,5 .,6 W,7 .,8 .,9 R,10 B,11 B,12 B,13 B. cols5-8: 5 .,6 W,7 .,8 . => . W . . Zone3 (cols10-? after ... [7405 chars truncated]
"Three weather fronts converge on the same valley, and the most violent system dominates each patch of sky."
120b: k=4
See: A long weather map split into three forecast zones by lines of thunderstorms. Sunshine blazes in the first zone, fog creeps through the second, and frost settles in the third — each against clear skies.
Do: Let the storm walls dissolve and the three fronts collapse into one small region. Sunshine burns away everything beneath it. Fog rolls in wherever sun doesn't reach. Frost only crystallizes on patches both clear and fog-free.
Grid: The final forecast covers a small square of sky where each cell shows whichever weather pattern was most forceful.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger, output smaller (4x4). Seems they collapse three zones into one small region. Probably they take three vertical sections separated by red line? In inputs, there is a column of R (red) that acts as divider? Let's examine Example1 input dimensions: appears 4 rows? Actually input lines: first line ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's many columns. Count: let's count tokens: .(1) .2 .3 Y4 R5 .6 .7 .8 W9 R10 .11 .12 .13 .14 => 14 columns. 4 rows. Output 4x4. So they take columns between red columns? There are red columns at positions 5 and 10? Actually there are two R's per row: at col5 and col10. Those may be the "storm walls". The three zones: left of first R, between Rs, right of second R. They collapse each zone into one column? Output 4x4 maybe each zone becomes a column? Let's see output columns correspond to zones? Output rows 4 same as input rows. Output columns 4, but there are 3 zones. Hmm maybe they also compress rows? Wait rows unchanged (4). Output columns 4 maybe each zone compressed to one column, plus something else? Let's test. Take Example1 row1 input: columns left of first R (cols1-4): . . . Y. That's zone1. Between Rs (cols6-9): . . . W .? Actually after first R at col5, then cols6-9: . . . W (col9). That's zone2. After second R (col10) to end (cols11-14): . . . . (all .). That's zone3. Now output row1: ". . . Y". That's 4 columns. Hmm maybe they take the most frequent color in each zone? Let's compute zone1: . . . Y => most frequent . (3) vs Y (1) => . So output col1 maybe . . .? Output row1 col1 is '.' matches. Zone2: . . . W => most frequent . (3) => '.' but output row1 col2 is '.'? Actually output row1 is ". . . Y": columns: 1 '.' 2 '.' 3 '.' 4 'Y'. So col2 '.' matches zone2. Zone3: . . . . => all '.' => '.' but output col3 '.' matches. Then what is col4 Y? Maybe from something else like the red column? The red column maybe indicates which zone's "most forceful" pattern? Or maybe they also consider the red column itself as a "sunshine" that burns away? Let's examine other rows. Row2 input: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." Let's split: before first R (col1-4): Y Y . Y => zone1. Between Rs (col6-9): W . W . => zone2. After second R (col11-14): . . . . => zone3. Output row2: "Y Y W Y". Columns: 1 Y,2 Y,3 W,4 Y. Our zone1 most frequent? Y Y . Y => Y appears 3, . 1 => Y matches output col1 Y. Zone2: W . W . => W appears 2, . 2 tie. Output col2 Y? Wait output col2 is Y, not W or . So not zone2. Hmm maybe output col2 corresponds to something else. Let's compute zone2 majority maybe choose the element directly above? Not. Maybe the output columns correspond to original columns at positions of the red lines? Let's see column5 is R (first red). Column10 is R (second). Maybe they take the column just left of each red? Not. Let's list output columns mapping: maybe output col1 = zone1 majority, col2 = zone2 majority, col3 = zone3 majorit ... [8580 chars truncated]
"Three blueprints are printed on translucent vellum and stacked — the boldest ink shows through at each point."
120b: k=1
See: A wide drafting table holds three floor plans separated by load-bearing columns drawn in red. Golden walls in the first plan, dark timber in the second, and blue tile in the third — all on transparent sheets.
Do: Remove the red column markers and align the three vellum sheets directly atop one another. Wherever golden ink was drawn, it dominates. Dark timber shows only where gold is absent. Blue tile peeks through only where both upper sheets are blank.
Grid: The composite blueprint is a single compact plan where each cell displays the topmost layer of ink.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are larger, output smaller. Example 1: Input appears 4 rows? Actually given Input lines: first line ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 15 cells. second line 15, third line 15, fourth line 15. Output is 4x4 grid. So transformation extracts something? Possibly overlay three layers separated by red columns? The description: three floor plans separated by load-bearing columns drawn in red. So red columns act as separators. So input contains three sub-grids separated by vertical red columns (R). Need to split into three sections left, middle, right? Then overlay: golden walls (Y) dominate, dark timber (maybe B? Actually dark timber maybe B? In description: first plan golden walls, second dark timber, third blue tile. Colors: golden = Y, dark timber = maybe B? but B is blue. Wait color key: B=blue, G=green, etc. Dark timber could be maybe G? Not sure. But description: third plan blue tile (maybe B). So second plan dark timber maybe something else like maybe W (maroon) or something. In example, we have colors Y, R, W, B. So likely Y = gold, W = dark timber, B = blue tile. So three sections: leftmost (first plan) contains Y and maybe other colors? middle contains W, rightmost contains B. Red columns separate them. Goal: remove red columns and align three sheets atop each other. Where gold (Y) present, it dominates (top). Dark timber (W) shows only where gold absent. Blue tile (B) appears only where both upper sheets are blank (i.e., no Y or W). So overlay rule: For each column position across three sections, we take topmost non-blank according to priority Y > W > B > else . (black). The blank is '.'. Thus we need to split each row into three parts using red columns as separators. In example, there are red columns maybe multiple R cells? Let's examine first row of example input: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." Let's index: positions 1-15. Red at position5? Actually after Y at pos4, then R at pos5. Then later W at pos9? Wait after R, there are ". . . W". Let's list: 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 Y,5 R,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 W,10 R,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 .? Actually there are 15 cells, we need count: Let's write sequence: . . . Y R . . . W R . . . . That's 15. So red at pos5 and pos10. So two red columns separate three sections: columns 1-4 (section1), columns6-9 (section2), columns11-15 (section3). Indeed each section width maybe 4,4,5? Let's see: section1 columns1-4 = . . . Y (contains Y). section2 columns6-9 = . . . W (contains W). section3 columns11-15 = . . . . . (all .). But output is 4x4, not 4x5. So maybe we take minimal width equal to smallest section width? Or maybe we overlay only first 4 columns of each? Let's examine other rows. Row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." Let's split: before first R (col1-4): Y Y . Y. After R, columns6-9: W . W . (positions6-9). After second R, columns11-15: . . . . . (all .). Output row2 is "Y Y W Y". That matches: combine Y from first section, W from second, Y from first? Wait overlay rule: For each ... [6356 chars truncated]
"Three armies converge on contested ground, and rank determines who holds each square of the battlefield."
120b: k=3
See: A long battlefield divided into three encampments by walls of fire. The imperial guard holds the first camp in gold, mercenaries occupy the second in dark armor, and conscripts huddle in the third in blue — each scattered across their zone.
Do: The fire walls fall and all three forces rush to claim the same territory. Imperial guards seize any ground they touch. Mercenaries hold positions the guard ignored. Conscripts only occupy what both others left vacant.
Grid: The contested ground is a small square where each position flies the banner of whichever force outranked the rest.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have input grids of size? Example1 input appears 4 rows? Actually given as lines with spaces. Let's count columns. Example1 Input first line: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." that's 14 columns. There are 4 rows. Output is 4x4 grid. So transformation extracts a 4x4 subgrid? Possibly the "contested ground" small square where each position flies the banner of whichever force outranked the rest. The description: three zones separated by fire walls. The zones correspond to colors: first camp gold (maybe Y? Actually gold maybe Y? In key Y=yellow, maybe gold). second dark armor (maybe B=blue? Or black?). third blue (B=blue). In examples, colors present: Y, R, W, B. R maybe fire walls? Actually fire walls maybe R (red). The zones separated by walls of fire (red). So red columns/rows act as separators. The three zones are left of first red column, between reds, right of last red? Let's examine Example1 input grid 4x14. Let's locate red columns. Row1: positions: columns index 0..13. Row1: . . . Y R . . . W R . . . . So reds at col4 and col9. Row2: Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . . reds at col4 and col9 again. Row3: Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B reds at col4 and col9. Row4: . Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B reds at col4 and col9. So two vertical fire walls at columns 4 and 9 dividing into three zones: columns 0-3 (first camp), columns5-8 (second), columns10-13 (third). Within each zone, there are colors: first zone has Y and . and maybe others. Second zone has W and . etc. Third zone has B and . etc. Output 4x4 corresponds to contested ground small square where each position flies banner of whichever force outranked the rest. Likely we need to combine the three zones into a 4x4 result: For each row, we take the cell from each zone according to some rule: Imperial guard (first camp) "seize any ground they touch" meaning they dominate any cell they occupy. Mercenaries hold positions the guard ignored (i.e., where guard had .). Conscripts only occupy what both others left vacant (i.e., where both guard and mercenaries had .). So final cell is: if first zone cell is not '.' (i.e., has a color), output that color. Else if second zone cell is not '.' output that color. Else if third zone cell is not '.' output that color. Else '.'? But output shows no '.' maybe? Let's test. Construct for each row, columns? Need to map zones to single column each? Actually output is 4x4, same rows as input (4). Columns correspond to zones? Probably each zone contributes one column to output: maybe we take the "most left column of each zone"? Let's examine Example1 output grid: Rows: Row1 output: ". . . Y" Row2: "Y Y W Y" Row3: "Y W Y Y" Row4: "B Y Y Y" Let's compute using rule per column: For each row, we need 4 columns output. Input zones width: first zone columns0-3 (4 columns). second zone columns5-8 (4 columns). third zone columns10-13 (4 columns). So each zone width equals output width (4). So maybe output is just the three zones stacked? ... [7906 chars truncated]
"Three casts rehearse the same scene on a triptych stage, and the star's spotlight always wins."
120b: k=3
See: A wide stage split into three panels by curtains of crimson. The leads stand in gold on the left panel, the understudies in somber tones in the middle, and the chorus in blue on the right — each hitting their marks against darkness.
Do: Draw back the crimson curtains and collapse all three panels into one intimate stage. A lead always takes center mark over an understudy; an understudy takes it over a chorus member. The chorus only occupies marks left entirely empty.
Grid: The final blocking diagram is a single compact stage where each mark belongs to whichever performer had highest billing.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger, output smaller (4x? maybe 4x4). Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions? Let's count rows: Input lines show 4 rows? Actually Example1 Input shows 4 rows each with many columns. Output is 4x4. So transformation extracts a 4x4 region? Let's map. Example1 Input row1: ". . . Y R . . . W R . . . ." Count columns: let's count tokens: .(1) .2 .3 Y4 R5 .6 .7 .8 W9 R10 .11 .12 .13 .14 => 14 columns. Row2: "Y Y . Y R W . W . R . . . ." => count: Y1 Y2 .3 Y4 R5 W6 .7 W8 .9 R10 .11 .12 .13 .14 => 14. Row3: "Y . Y Y R . W W . R B B . B" => count: Y1 .2 Y3 Y4 R5 .6 W7 W8 .9 R10 B11 B12 .13 B14 =>14. Row4: ". Y Y Y R . W . . R B B B B" => .1 Y2 Y3 Y4 R5 .6 W7 .8 .9 R10 B11 B12 B13 B14 =>14. Output 4x4: Row1: ". . . Y" Row2: "Y Y W Y" Row3: "Y W Y Y" Row4: "B Y Y Y" So output seems to be derived from columns maybe 4-? Let's see mapping: maybe we collapse three panels separated by crimson curtains (R). The description: three panels split by curtains of crimson (R). So R columns act as separators. Input has vertical lines of R? Let's examine columns where R appears. In each row, there is an R at column5? Row1 column5 is R. Row2 column5 R. Row3 column5 R. Row4 column5 R. So column5 is a vertical curtain of R across all rows. Also there is another R later column10? Row1 column10 R, row2 column10 R, row3 column10 R, row4 column10 R. So there are two curtains? Actually description says three panels split by curtains of crimson. So two curtains dividing into three panels: left panel columns 1-4, middle columns 6-9? Wait column5 is curtain, then columns6-9 middle, column10 curtain, columns11-14 right panel. Thus left panel (columns1-4) contains leads (gold) maybe Y? Actually gold maybe Y (yellow). Understudies somber tones maybe B (blue) or black? Chorus in blue (B). Wait description: leads stand in gold on left panel, understudies in somber tones in middle, chorus in blue on right. So left panel should have Y (gold). Middle panel somber tones maybe . (black) or maybe W (maroon)?? Actually maroon is W (given). But "somber tones" could be grey X or black . Let's see data: In left panel columns1-4 of input example1: rows: Row1: . . . Y Row2: Y Y . Y Row3: Y . Y Y Row4: . Y Y Y These are . and Y. So Y is gold leads, . is black maybe empty. So left panel contains Y and . (black). Good. Middle panel columns6-9 (since column5 is curtain, column10 curtain). Let's extract rows columns6-9: Row1 col6 . col7 . col8 . col9 W => . . . W Row2 col6 W col7 . col8 W col9 . => W . W . Row3 col6 . col7 W col8 W col9 . => . W W . Row4 col6 . col7 W col8 . col9 . => . W . . These contain W (maroon) and . and maybe other colors. So "somber tones" maybe W (maroon) representing understudies. Right panel columns11-14: Row1 col11 . col12 . col13 . col14 . => all . Row2 col11 . col12 . col13 . col14 . => all . Row3 col11 B col12 B col13 . col14 B => B B . B Row4 col11 B col12 B col ... [8486 chars truncated]
"Three seed trays are pressed into one bed, and the most aggressive root system claims each plot."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A long garden bed sectioned into three planting trays by hedgerows of red roses. Sunflowers fill the first tray, nightshade the second, and forget-me-nots the third — each sprouting from scattered plots against bare soil.
Do: Uproot the rose hedgerows and press all three trays into one small bed. Sunflowers choke out everything at their plots. Nightshade takes over wherever sunflowers didn't root. Forget-me-nots survive only in doubly vacant soil.
Grid: One compact flower bed where each plot grows whichever plant's roots were most aggressive.
See: A 3×3 grid with a black (.) background containing a small number of non-black colored cells scattered at various positions. Each non-black cell represents a 'seed' that will generate a diagonal streak in the output.
Do: Create an output grid of 6×3 (6 rows, 6 columns — double the input dimensions). Initialize all cells to black. For every non-black cell at position (row, col) in the input, place that color repeatedly along a diagonal streak: at (row, col), (row+1, col+1), (row+2, col+2), and so on, continuing until the position falls outside the output grid boundaries. If two streaks overlap at the same position, the cell retains whichever color is placed there (in practice, streaks from distinct input cells do not collide).
Grid: The input is always a 3×3 grid. The output is a 6×6 grid (exactly double the input dimensions in both rows and columns). The background color is black (.). The coordinate system is zero-indexed with (0,0) at the top-left corner, rows increasing downward, and columns increasing to the right.
"Shooting stars streak across a night sky from where they ignite."
120b: k=2
See: A small patch of night sky holds a few bright stars scattered among the darkness. Each star burns with its own unique color — these are meteors caught at the moment of ignition, frozen just before they begin their descent.
Do: The sky expands as night deepens, and each meteor finally falls. Every star streaks diagonally downward and to the right, leaving a trail of its own light — an afterimage that repeats its color at each step of the descent. The meteors fall in parallel, each one tracing its own luminous scar from wherever it first appeared, tumbling until it passes beyond the edge of the visible sky.
Grid: The initial sky is a small square window. As the meteor shower unfolds, the visible sky doubles in both height and width to accommodate the full length of every falling streak. The void of space remains black wherever no star has burned its path.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input is 3x3? Example1 input 3x3. Output 6x6 (double size). The rule: each non-black cell (colored) creates a diagonal line down-right across the expanded grid, repeating its color each step, starting at its original position scaled? Let's examine. Example1 input grid coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input: row0: . Y . row1: . A . row2: R . . So colors: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). Output 6x6. Let's map. Output rows (0-5) columns (0-5): Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A We can see diagonal lines: Y appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal down-right from its original position (0,1) extending to edge. A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). So each colored cell creates a diagonal line down-right, including its original cell, extending until hitting bottom or right edge of output grid. Output grid size is double input dimensions (3->6). Why double? Because the longest diagonal from top-leftmost cell may need extra space? Actually if we just extend diagonally within same size, some lines would go out of bounds. Doubling ensures enough space for all lines to fit. Specifically, output size = input size *2. The original positions are placed at same coordinates? Let's check: Input (0,1) Y appears at output (0,1) same. Input (1,1) A appears at output (1,1) same. Input (2,0) R appears at output (2,0) same. So original grid placed at top-left corner of output (same coordinates). Then for each colored cell, we fill cells (r + k, c + k) for k=0..(N*2 - max(r,c) -1) maybe until hitting edge. Thus rule: For each non-'.' cell, copy its color along the diagonal down-right across the expanded grid. Now Example2: Input 3x3: row0: M B . row1: G . . row2: . . . Colors: M (0,0), B (0,1), G (1,0). Output 6x6: Row0: M B . . . . Row1: G M B . . . Row2: . G M B . . Row3: . . G M B . Row4: . . . G M B Row5: . . . . G M Check diagonals: M at (0,0) appears at (0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5). B at (0,1) appears at (0,1),(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5). G at (1,0) appears at (1,0),(2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,4). Works. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input 3x3: row0: . . G row1: . . . row2: . Y W Coordinates: G at (0,2). Y at (2,1). W at (2,2). Also maybe other colors? That's all. We need output 6x6. Place original cells at same positions. Now extend each diagonal down-right. First G at (0,2). Diagonal positions: (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). Continue until out of bounds (col 6 would be out). So positions: (0,2) G, (1,3) G, (2,4) G, (3,5) G. Second Y at (2,1). Positions: (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Also (6,5) out. So Y at those. Third W at (2,2). Positions: (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Now we need to fill rest with '.'. Let's construct 6x6 grid rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Initialize all '.'. Place G line: (0,2)=G (1,3)=G (2,4)=G (3,5)=G Place Y line: (2,1)=Y (3,2)=Y (4,3)=Y (5,4)=Y P ... [871 chars truncated]
"Spores released from scattered fungi drift on a gentle southeast wind, each one depositing copies of itself as it floats further from the parent organism."
120b: k=1
See: A petri dish with a few fungal colonies on a dark growth medium.
Do: Each colony releases spores that drift and replicate along their dispersal path, leaving a trail of identical organisms behind them.
Grid: The dish doubles in size to accommodate the full dispersal range of every spore trail.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3? Example1 input grid appears 3x3: rows: ". Y ." ". A ." "R . ." Output is 6x6. So dish doubles size (maybe each dimension doubles). The rule: each colored cell (non-.) acts as a source that creates a diagonal line? Let's examine mapping. Input coordinates (row, col) 0-index: (0,1)=Y (1,1)=A (2,0)=R Output 6x6 grid rows given: Row0: ". Y . . . ." Row1: ". A Y . . ." Row2: ". R . A Y ." Row3: ". R . A Y ."? Wait row3 given: ". R . A Y ."? Actually output lines: ". Y . . . ." ". A Y . . ." "R . A Y . ." ". R . A Y ." ". . R . A Y" ". . . R . A" Let's list rows 0-5, columns 0-5. Row0: col1 Y Row1: col1 A, col2 Y Row2: col0 R, col2 A, col3 Y Row3: col1 R, col3 A, col4 Y Row4: col2 R, col4 A, col5 Y Row5: col3 R, col5 A Observations: It seems each original cell spawns a diagonal line (south-east direction?) of its color, replicating across the enlarged grid. Also maybe also north-west? Let's see. Original Y at (0,1) in input. In output, Y appears at positions (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal down-right (south-east) from its original location, extending until hitting edge. So Y replicates along SE direction. Original A at (1,1). In output, A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). That's also SE diagonal. Original R at (2,0). Output R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). That's also SE diagonal. Thus rule: For each non-black cell in input, copy it along the SE diagonal (down-right) across the enlarged grid, which is double size (maybe to accommodate longest path). The output grid size is (input rows *2) by (input cols *2). Indeed 3x3 -> 6x6. Also note that the original positions are preserved (they are part of diagonal). The output cells that are not filled remain black '.'. Thus for test input 3x3: Rows: 0: ". . G" 1: ". . ." 2: ". Y W" Coordinates: (0,2)=G (2,1)=Y (2,2)=W We need to produce 6x6 output with each color replicating SE diagonal. Let's compute. Initialize 6x6 with '.'. For each source: 1) G at (0,2). In output coordinates same as input? Since we double size, we map input coordinates directly to same positions in output (top-left). So (0,2) in output gets G. Then replicate SE: (1,3), (2,4), (3,5) until column 5 max. Row also increments. So positions: (0,2) G (1,3) G (2,4) G (3,5) G (4,6) out of bounds, stop. 2) Y at (2,1). Output (2,1) Y. Replicate SE: (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). So positions: (2,1) Y (3,2) Y (4,3) Y (5,4) Y 3) W at (2,2). Output (2,2) W. Replicate SE: (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). So: (2,2) W (3,3) W (4,4) W (5,5) W Now we need to ensure no conflicts (overlap). Overlaps? Let's see positions: (3,3) already W, (3,3) also maybe from Y? Y path includes (3,2) not (3,3). G path includes (3,5). So no overlap. Now produce final grid rows 0-5 each 6 columns. Let's fill. Create 6x6 matrix. Row0 col0-5: positions: (0,2)=G. Others '.'. Row0: col0 ., col1 ., col2 G, col3 ., col4 ., col5 . => ". . G . . ." Row1: (1,3)=G. Others '.'. => ". . . G ... [559 chars truncated]
"Comets originating from different points in a star chart streak across the void along parallel trajectories, each painting a tail of its own spectral color at every position it crosses."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky chart with a few colored celestial objects at scattered coordinates.
Do: Each object streaks along the same diagonal vector, depositing its color at every grid crossing until it exits the chart.
Grid: The chart doubles in extent to capture each comet's full visible trail.
"Dye markers dropped from different positions on a dark sea are carried by the same diagonal current, each leaving a ribbon of color in the water at every league it travels."
120b: k=1
See: A dark ocean grid with a few colored dye markers at scattered positions.
Do: The current carries each marker along the same diagonal heading, and each marker stains the water at every position along its drift.
Grid: The chart expands to show the full drift path of every dye ribbon.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . Y . Row2: . A . Row3: R . . Output is 6x6? Let's map. Input positions: coordinates (row,col) starting 0. (0,1)=Y, (1,1)=A, (2,0)=R. The description: "current carries each marker along the same diagonal heading, and each marker stains the water at every position along its drift." So each marker moves along a diagonal direction (maybe down-right?) and leaves trail. The output expands to show full drift path of every dye ribbon. We need to see output pattern. Output grid 6x6: Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A Let's index output rows 0-5, cols 0-5. We see diagonal lines of each color? Let's trace Y: appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a down-right diagonal starting at original Y position (0,1) moving (+1,+1) each step until hitting edge. So Y drifts down-right. A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). That's also down-right diagonal starting at (1,1). So A drifts down-right. R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). That's also down-right diagonal starting at (2,0). So all markers drift down-right. Thus rule: For each non-blank cell in input, extend a line of same color down-right (south-east) until reaching bottom or right edge, filling those cells. Output grid size expands to accommodate longest diagonal? Input 3x3, max diagonal length from top-leftmost? The farthest down-right from (0,1) goes to column 5 row 4? Actually grid expanded to 6x6. How determined? Possibly size = original rows + original cols -1? For 3x3, that would be 5? But output is 6. Let's compute: maybe they create square of size (rows+cols)? 3+3=6. Yes output 6x6. So new dimension = rows+cols. Starting positions placed at same coordinates as input? In output, original positions appear at same coordinates? Input (0,1) Y appears at output (0,1) yes. Input (1,1) A at (1,1). Input (2,0) R at (2,0). So they keep original top-left anchored, and expand grid to size N+M where N rows, M cols. Thus for test input 3x3 as well, output will be 6x6. Test input: Row0: . . G Row1: . . . Row2: . Y W Positions: (0,2)=G, (2,1)=Y, (2,2)=W. We need to extend each down-right. Compute grid size 6x6. Initialize all '.'. Place original markers. Now extend each: G at (0,2): positions (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). Continue until row or col exceed 5. Next would be (4,6) out of bounds. So fill those. Y at (2,1): positions (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Fill. W at (2,2): positions (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Fill. Check for overlaps: none overlapping? Let's see: G path includes (2,4) which is not used by others. Y path includes (5,4) which is also used by G? G path includes (3,5) only. So no overlap. Now produce output rows 0-5 each 6 columns. Let's construct. Initialize 6x6 '.'. Place G path: (0,2)=G (1,3)=G (2,4)=G (3,5)=G Place Y path: (2,1)=Y (3,2)=Y (4,3)=Y (5,4)=Y Place W path: (2,2)=W (3,3)=W (4,4)=W (5, ... [629 chars truncated]
"Charged particles emitted from scattered sources on a dark circuit board are deflected by the same electromagnetic field, each tracing a diagonal path of glowing pulses across the board."
120b: k=1
See: A dark circuit board with a few glowing colored emitters at various positions.
Do: Each emitter sends a particle along the same diagonal vector, leaving a pulse of its color at every node it passes.
Grid: The board extends to accommodate the full trace length of every particle path.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . Y . Row2: . A . Row3: R . . Output is 6x6? Let's map. Input positions: coordinates (row,col) starting 0. Emitters? Colors: Y, A, R are colored cells. Others '.' black. Interpretation: each emitter sends particle along same diagonal vector. Which diagonal? Probably down-right? Let's see output pattern. Output grid 6x6: Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A We can see diagonal lines of each color moving down-right each step. Starting positions correspond to original positions placed in top-left corner of larger grid? Let's map coordinates. Original grid 3x3 placed at top-left of output? Input (0,1)=Y appears at output (0,1) same. Input (1,1)=A appears at output (1,1). Input (2,0)=R appears at output (2,0). So original positions preserved. Now each emitter leaves a trail of its color along down-right diagonal (increase row and col) until hitting edge of output grid. The output grid size seems to be (n+m-1?) Actually input size 3, output size 6. Maybe size = rows+cols? 3+3=6. Yes. So we extend board to accommodate full trace length of every particle path. For a grid of size N rows, M cols, output size = N+M-1 rows and columns? Actually output is square 6x6. Input 3x3 => N+M-? 3+3=6. So square of size N+M? maybe. Thus we need to generate a square of size N+M? For rectangular maybe. The rule: For each colored cell at (r,c) in input, fill cells (r+k, c+k) for k=0..(N+M-2 - max(r,c))? Actually until reaching bottom/right edge of output grid (size S = N+M). So we fill diagonal down-right. Check: For Y at (0,1). Output has Y at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Indeed row+col increase each step. In output we see Y at those positions: row0 col1, row1 col2, row2 col3, row3 col4, row4 col5. Yes. For A at (1,1): appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Indeed output shows A at those positions. For R at (2,0): appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). Output shows R at those positions. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input: 3x3 grid: Row0: . . G Row1: . . . Row2: . Y W Positions: G at (0,2). Y at (2,1). W at (2,2). Colors: G green, Y yellow, W maroon. We need output size 6x6. Create empty 6x6 '.' initially. Place each emitter and its diagonal down-right. Compute for each: G at (0,2): positions (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). (4,6) out of bounds (col 6). So fill those. Y at (2,1): positions (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). (6,5) out. W at (2,2): positions (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Now we need to consider overlapping? Not in this case maybe overlapping at (3,3) is W, (3,3) also maybe from something else? No other. Check (3,3) also from? Y diagonal passes (3,2) not (3,3). So fine. Now produce output grid rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Initialize all '.'. Set G positions: (0,2)=G (1,3)=G (2,4)=G (3,5)=G Set Y positions: (2,1)=Y (3,2)=Y (4,3)=Y (5,4)=Y Set W positions: (2,2)=W (3,3)=W (4,4)=W (5,5)= ... [580 chars truncated]
"Heroes set out from different villages on a dark map, each following the same enchanted compass that pulls them along a diagonal quest-line, planting their banner at every waystation."
120b: k=2
See: A dark realm map with a few colored banners marking scattered starting villages.
Do: Each hero marches along the same enchanted diagonal bearing, planting a copy of their banner at every stop until they pass beyond the edge of the known world.
Grid: The map of the realm is expanded to contain every hero's full pilgrimage.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grid is some size (3x3). Output is larger (6x6). Looks like they are extending diagonally copying elements along a diagonal direction (maybe down-right). Let's examine Example1. Input 3x3: Row0: . Y . Row1: . A . Row2: R . . Coordinates (r,c). Non-blank (non-.) cells: (0,1)=Y, (1,1)=A, (2,0)=R. Output 6x6 grid shown: Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A Let's map positions. Output size 6. It seems they are extending the pattern along diagonal direction (down-left? down-right?). Let's see original positions relative to output. Maybe they placed original grid in top-left corner? Input 3x3 placed at top-left of output? Let's check output rows 0-2 columns 0-2: Rows0-2 cols0-2: Row0: . Y . Row1: . A Y? Wait row1 col2 is Y, but input row1 col2 is . . Actually input row1 col2 is . (col2). So not same. Let's write output matrix coordinates. I'll index rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Row0: col0 '.'; col1 'Y'; col2 '.'; col3 '.'; col4 '.'; col5 '.' Row1: '.'; 'A'; 'Y'; '.'; '.'; '.' Row2: 'R'; '.'; 'A'; 'Y'; '.'; '.' Row3: '.'; 'R'; '.'; 'A'; 'Y'; '.' Row4: '.'; '.'; 'R'; '.'; 'A'; 'Y' Row5: '.'; '.'; '.'; 'R'; '.'; 'A' We see a diagonal pattern of each color moving down-right? Let's trace Y: appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal line with slope +1 (down-right). Starting at (0,1) which matches original Y at (0,1). So Y is replicated along that diagonal until hitting edge. A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). That's diagonal starting at (1,1) original A. R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). That's diagonal starting at (2,0) original R. Thus rule: For each non-blank cell in input, copy its color along the down-right diagonal (south-east) until reaching grid boundary. Output grid size is such that all copies fit; seems output dimension = input size *2? Input 3 => output 6. Example2 also 3->6. Check Example2. Input: Row0: M B . Row1: G . . Row2: . . . Non-blank: (0,0)=M, (0,1)=B, (1,0)=G. Output 6x6: Row0: M B . . . . Row1: G M B . . . Row2: . G M B . . Row3: . . G M B . Row4: . . . G M B Row5: . . . . G M Let's see diagonals: M at (0,0) then (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Yes. B at (0,1) then (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Yes. G at (1,0) then (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Yes. Thus rule: Output grid size = (input rows + input cols -1?) Wait input is square 3x3, output 6x6 = 2*input size. In general maybe output size = input rows + input cols - 1? For square n, that would be 2n-1 = 5 for n=3, but we have 6. So maybe they double size (n*2). Let's test: For n=3, output 6. So rule: output dimension = 2 * input dimension (assuming square). Could be they extend until each diagonal reaches edge; the furthest needed is original farthest cell plus its diagonal length. The maximum needed rows = max row index + (max possible steps) where steps = (output size - 1 - col). But they choose size such tha ... [4955 chars truncated]
"Dancers in different colored costumes begin at scattered positions on a dark stage, each performing the same diagonal chassé, leaving an afterimage of themselves at every step."
120b: k=3
See: A dark stage with a few costumed dancers at different starting marks.
Do: Each dancer executes identical diagonal steps, and a ghostly afterimage in their costume's color is left at every position they pass through.
Grid: The stage floor doubles in size to give every dancer room to complete their full sequence of steps.
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input grid is 3x3? Example1 input 3x3. Output is 6x6. So stage doubles size (2x). The dancers are colored cells (non-.)? In example1 input: positions: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). Output shows pattern: seems each dancer moves diagonally down-right each step, leaving afterimage of its color at each visited cell. Also grid expands to accommodate full sequences until they exit? Let's examine. Define coordinates row, col. Input size N=3. Output size 2N=6. In example1, dancer R at (2,0) (bottom left). Moves diagonal down-right? Starting at (2,0) in input. In output, we see R appears at (2,0) (original location) and also at (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). Indeed output rows 0-5 columns 0-5. Let's map: Output row2 col0 = R (original). Row3 col1 = R, row4 col2 = R, row5 col3 = R. So moves down-right each step. Dancer A at (1,1). Output shows A at (1,1) original, then at (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Indeed pattern. Dancer Y at (0,1). Output shows Y at (0,1) original, then (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Yes. Thus each colored cell replicates along diagonal down-right until hitting bottom/right edge of output grid (size 2N). Starting positions are placed in top-left quadrant? Actually original grid occupies top-left N x N of output? Let's see: Input placed at rows0-2 cols0-2 of output? In example1 output, first three rows and columns contain original pattern? Row0 col0 '.' row0 col1 Y row0 col2 '.' matches input row0. Row1 col0 '.' col1 A col2 '.' matches input row1. Row2 col0 R col1 '.' col2 '.' matches input row2. Yes original placed at top-left quadrant. Thus rule: For each non-blank cell in input, copy its color along the diagonal (down-right) across the expanded grid of size 2N, filling cells with that color (overwrites? but they don't overlap because different colors may intersect? In examples they seem to create a pattern where colors shift; overlapping maybe not happen because they are offset). Let's test overlapping scenario: Example2 input: M at (0,0), B at (0,1), G at (1,0). Output shows pattern: Row0: M B . . . . (original). Row1: G M B . . . (G original at (1,0) then M at (1,1) B at (1,2)). Row2: . G M B . . (G at (2,1) etc). So each moves down-right. Thus rule: Expand grid to double dimensions (2N x 2N). Place original grid in top-left N x N. Then for each colored cell, fill its diagonal down-right line across the rest of the grid (including original cell). The line continues until reaching bottom or right edge (i.e., until row index = 2N-1 or col index = 2N-1). The cells along the line are set to that color. If multiple colors would occupy same cell, maybe priority? Not needed. Now test input: 3x3 grid: Row0: . . G Row1: . . . Row2: . Y W Coordinates: G at (0,2). Y at (2,1). W at (2,2). We need output size 6x6. Place original in top-left 3x3. Initialize 6x6 with '.'. Set original cells. Now for each colored cell, fill diagonal down-right. Let's compute. Grid indices rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Cell G a ... [1294 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins of different ores originate at scattered points in a dark rock face and run along parallel diagonal fault lines, depositing their characteristic color at every stratum they cross."
120b: k=1
See: A dark cross-section of rock with a few colored mineral deposits at scattered positions.
Do: Each deposit extends as a vein along the same diagonal fault angle, coloring every stratum it passes through.
Grid: The rock face cross-section is enlarged to reveal the full extent of every mineral vein.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . Y . Row2: . A . Row3: R . . Output is 6x6? Let's see output rows: Row1: . Y . . . . Row2: . A Y . . . Row3: R . A Y . . Row4: . R . A Y . Row5: . . R . A Y Row6: . . . R . A So output is 6x6. Input had three colored cells: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). They seem to be placed along a diagonal? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Input size 3. Output size 6 = 2*input? maybe each cell expands along diagonal direction (south-east?) The description: each deposit extends as a vein along same diagonal fault angle, coloring every stratum it passes through. So each colored cell creates a diagonal line (maybe down-right) across the enlarged grid. Look at output: we see pattern of Y, A, R forming diagonal lines? Let's examine output grid coordinates. I'll index rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A We can see three diagonal lines of each color? Let's trace Y: appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal from top row col1 down-right. So Y line length 5 (maybe input size+2?). Starting point corresponds to original Y at (0,1) in input. In output, Y appears shifted? Input Y at (0,1) becomes start of diagonal at same relative position? Output grid larger, maybe each original cell becomes start of a diagonal that extends to bottom/right until hitting edge. Similarly A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). That's diagonal from (1,1) down-right to bottom-right corner. Input A at (1,1) matches start. R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). That's diagonal from (2,0) down-right. Thus rule: For each colored cell in input, copy it into output grid of size (input rows + input cols -1?) Actually output size 6 = input rows + input cols -? Input 3x3 => output 6x6 = 2*3? maybe output dimension = input rows + input rows? Let's compute: diagonal length for Y is 5, which equals (output size - start col). Starting col 1, length 5 => goes to col5. So output size 6. General rule: output grid is square of size (input rows + input cols - 1) = 3+3-? =5? Not 6. Hmm. Maybe they double the size: each original cell becomes a 2x2 block? Not. Let's think: The diagonal lines extend until they hit the bottom or right edge. The output grid must be large enough to accommodate the longest diagonal from any starting cell to bottom/right. Starting cell at top row may need length = (output size - start col). For Y start col 1, length 5 => output size 6. So output size = input rows + (input rows -1) = 2*input rows? For 3 =>6. So maybe they expand each row/col by factor 2? Let's test: If we double dimensions, each original cell coordinates map to same coordinates in larger grid? Input (0,1) maps to output (0,1) same. So they just embed original grid in top-left of larger grid? But output includes original cells plus new ones. The original grid size 3 fits within 6 top-left? Actu ... [2767 chars truncated]
"Ingredients placed on a tilted cutting board slide slowly toward the corner, leaving a smear of their color behind like dragged sauce on a plate."
120b: k=2
See: A small dark plate with a few dollops of colored sauces at various positions.
Do: Tilt the plate so each dollop streaks diagonally, painting a repeating trail of itself as it slides.
Grid: The plating canvas expands to catch every streak before it runs off the edge.
We need to infer rule. Input grid small (3x3). Output larger (6x6). It seems they are extending diagonally repeating pattern of each colored cell sliding down-right? Let's examine example1. Input 3x3: row0: . Y . row1: . A . row2: R . . Coordinates (r,c). Non-black cells: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). Output 6x6 grid shown. Let's write output rows (0-5): 0: . Y . . . . 1: . A Y . . . 2: R . A Y . . 3: . R . A Y . 4: . . R . A Y 5: . . . R . A Observe pattern: each colored element creates a diagonal line down-right (south-east) repeating itself, but also seems to shift each step? Let's map. Take Y at (0,1) in input. In output, Y appears at positions: (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal line length 5? Starting at same relative position? Input grid size 3, output size 6. So Y line length maybe output size - column index? Actually start at row0 col1, then each step row+1 col+1 until hitting edge (col5). So Y replicates down-right until edge. Similarly A at (1,1) appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Diagonal. R at (2,0) appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). Diagonal until edge. Thus rule: For each non-black cell in input, copy it along the diagonal down-right (south-east) until reaching bottom or right edge of output grid. Output grid size appears to be (input rows + input cols -1?) Input 3x3 => output 6x6 (maybe double?). Actually 3+3 =6. So output dimension = rows+cols? Let's test example2. Input 3x3: row0: M B . row1: G . . row2: . . . Non-black: M (0,0), B (0,1), G (1,0). Output 6x6: Row0: M B . . . . Row1: G M B . . . Row2: . G M B . . Row3: . . G M B . Row4: . . . G M B Row5: . . . . G M Check positions: M at (0,0) appears at (0,0), (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Diagonal length 6. B at (0,1) appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Diagonal. G at (1,0) appears at (1,0), (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Diagonal. Thus same rule. Output size = input rows + input cols? Input rows=3, cols=3 => 6. Works. If input not square? Not given but likely same. Thus for test input 3x3: row0: . . G row1: . . . row2: . Y W Non-black cells: G at (0,2), Y at (2,1), W at (2,2). Also maybe others? That's all. Output size 6x6. We need to place each along diagonal down-right. Compute coordinates. Grid indices rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Start with all '.' (black). Then for each source cell (r,c) copy to (r+i, c+i) for i >=0 while within bounds. Let's process. 1) G at (0,2): Positions: (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). Next (4,6) out of bounds col>5. So four positions. 2) Y at (2,1): Positions: (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Next (6,5) out of rows. 3) W at (2,2): Positions: (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Now need to consider overlapping? No overlapping among these sets? Let's check: (3,3) is both from W and maybe from something else? Not from Y (Y at (5,4) final). G at (3,5). So only W at (3,3). No conflict. Thus output grid rows: Initialize 6x6 '.'. Row0: columns 0-5: only G at col2. So row0: . . G . . . Row1: ... [672 chars truncated]
"Notes struck on a dulcimer ring out in cascading echoes, each echo displaced one beat later and one step higher, until the resonance fades beyond the staff."
120b: k=1
See: A few notes placed on a small musical staff against silence.
Do: Each note echoes repeatedly, with every echo shifted in both time and pitch, producing cascading repetitions that extend the composition.
Grid: The staff lengthens to contain the full decay of every echoing note.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input appears 3 rows, each with 3 entries. Output is 6x6? Actually output shows 6 rows each with 6 entries. So transformation expands grid. Interpretation: notes echo shifting in time (right) and pitch (down). So each non-black cell (colored) replicates diagonally down-right repeatedly, forming a diagonal line of copies until hitting edge? Let's examine. Input example1 grid coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Row0: . Y . => Y at (0,1) Row1: . A . => A at (1,1) Row2: R . . => R at (2,0) Output 6x6 grid. Let's map positions of colors. I'll write output rows: 0: . Y . . . . 1: . A Y . . . 2: R . A Y . . 3: . R . A Y . 4: . . R . A Y 5: . . . R . A Let's index rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Positions: Y at (0,1), also at (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal down-right from original Y (0,1) moving (1,1) each step until edge. A at (1,1), also at (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Diagonal down-right. R at (2,0), also at (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). Diagonal down-right. Thus each original colored cell replicates along diagonal down-right until hitting bottom or right edge of output grid. Output grid size appears to be original size + max distance? For each original cell, its diagonal extends to bottom/right edges. The overall output dimensions are (rows + cols -1) maybe? Input 3x3 => output 6x6? That's rows+cols? 3+3=6. Yes output dimension = N+M where N rows, M cols? Actually both 3, sum 6. So output is (rows+cols) x (rows+cols). Let's test: If we have 3x3 input, output 6x6. So formula: size = rows + cols? For square, double size. For rectangular maybe rows+cols? We'll assume. Now test input: 3x3 as well. Input: Row0: . . G => G at (0,2) Row1: . . . => none Row2: . Y W => Y at (2,1), W at (2,2) We need to produce 6x6 output with diagonals for each colored cell. Let's list each colored cell coordinates (r,c) in input. G: (0,2) Y: (2,1) W: (2,2) Now we need to map them into output grid coordinates? The original positions likely map to same coordinates in output? In example, original Y at (0,1) appears at same location (0,1) in output. Yes. So we embed input grid in top-left corner of output grid (size rows+cols). So output rows 0-5, cols 0-5. Input occupies rows 0-2, cols 0-2. The rest initially black '.'. Now we propagate each colored cell down-right diagonally until hitting bottom or right edge (i.e., row index up to 5, col up to 5). Fill those positions with same color. Potential overlapping? In example, diagonals overlapped? Let's see: At (2,3) there is Y from original Y diagonal, also maybe from A? No A diagonal at (2,2). So no overlap. Overlap could happen if two diagonals intersect; maybe later one overrides? Not needed. Now compute for each cell. First G at (0,2). Diagonal positions: (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). Continue until row 5 or col 5. Next would be (4,6) out of bounds col>5, stop. So positions: (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). Second Y at (2,1). Po ... [1040 chars truncated]
"Billiard balls struck from their starting positions roll toward the far pocket along identical angles, leaving colored chalk traces on the felt as they travel."
120b: k=2
See: A few colored billiard balls resting on a dark felt table.
Do: Each ball rolls along the same diagonal trajectory, marking the felt with its color at every position it passes through.
Grid: The table extends to give each ball room to complete its full roll to the cushion.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are 3x3? Example1 input 3x3, output 6x6. Example2 input 3x3, output 6x6. So output size double? Actually 3x3 to 6x6 (2x). The rule: balls roll along same diagonal trajectory marking color at each position. Likely each non-black cell (colored) moves down-right diagonal (south-east) repeatedly, filling cells, creating diagonal lines of same color across output grid. Also maybe they also propagate in other direction? Let's examine example1. Input1: Row0: . Y . Row1: . A . Row2: R . . Coordinates (r,c). Colors: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). Output 6x6 grid given: Let's write coordinates 0-5 rows/cols. Output rows: 0: . Y . . . . 1: . A Y . . . 2: R . A Y . . 3: . R . A Y . 4: . . R . A Y 5: . . . R . A Let's map each color's diagonal line. Take Y: appears at (0,1) in input. In output, Y appears at positions: (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's a diagonal down-right from its original location (0,1) extending to bottom right edge. So Y line length 5? Actually from row0 col1 to row4 col5 (since grid 6). That's 5 steps inclusive? Count: rows 0-4 (5 cells). So line length = output size - max(row, col) maybe. Take A: input at (1,1). Output A appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). That's diagonal down-right from its original location to bottom right edge. Take R: input at (2,0). Output R appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). That's diagonal down-right from its original location to bottom edge (col+row). So rule: each colored cell extends a diagonal line down-right (south-east) filling same color until hitting bottom or right edge of output grid. But also note that output grid includes original positions shifted? Actually original grid 3x3 placed in top-left of 6x6? Let's see: Input R at (2,0) appears at output (2,0) same coordinates. Y at (0,1) appears at (0,1). A at (1,1) appears at (1,1). So original positions are preserved (top-left alignment). So output grid is larger, but original placed at same coordinates (top-left). Then each colored cell draws a diagonal line down-right until hitting border. Now check Example2. Input2: Row0: M B . Row1: G . . Row2: . . . Colors: M at (0,0), B at (0,1), G at (1,0). Output 6x6: Rows: 0: M B . . . . 1: G M B . . . 2: . G M B . . 3: . . G M B . 4: . . . G M B 5: . . . . G M Let's map lines. M at (0,0) appears at (0,0), (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Diagonal down-right to bottom right. B at (0,1) appears at (0,1), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Diagonal down-right. G at (1,0) appears at (1,0), (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). Diagonal down-right. Matches rule. Thus transformation: output size = input size *2? Actually input 3 -> output 6. Could be double each dimension. But maybe rule: extend each diagonal until reaching size = input rows + input cols? For 3x3, max dimension 3, output 6 = 2*3. Could be because need space for longest diagonal from top-leftmost cell to bottom-rightmost after extension. For a cell at (r,c), the line length to botto ... [2526 chars truncated]
"Storm cells born at scattered origins drift in the prevailing wind, each depositing a line of identical weather along its track like a jet stream painting the sky."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky map with a few colored storm cells at different positions.
Do: Each cell drifts along the same bearing, stamping its signature at every waypoint until it dissipates beyond the map's edge.
Grid: The forecast map doubles to show the full projected path of every storm.
"Colored lanterns hung at different floors of a glass atrium cast their light diagonally through the building, each beam illuminating a staircase of windows in its own hue."
120b: k=1
See: A small building facade with a few illuminated colored windows against a dark exterior.
Do: Each lantern projects its glow through a diagonal series of windows, coloring each one it touches as the beam descends through the structure.
Grid: The building's facade extends to reveal the full diagonal reach of every beam of light.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input appears 3x3: rows: ". Y ." ". A ." "R . ." Output is 6x6? Let's see output rows: ". Y . . . ." ". A Y . . ." "R . A Y . ." ". R . A Y ." ". . R . A Y" ". . . R . A" That's 6x6. So transformation expands grid, maybe each colored cell projects diagonally down-right? The metaphor: each lantern projects its glow through a diagonal series of windows, coloring each one it touches as the beam descends through the structure. So each colored cell (non-.) creates a diagonal line down-right (south-east) filling with its color? But output shows multiple colors along diagonals, maybe overlapping? Let's map. Input coordinates (row, col) 0-index: (0,1)=Y (1,1)=A (2,0)=R Now output 6x6. Let's see where Y appears: output grid coordinates: Row0: col1 Y (same as input?) plus later? Row0: ". Y . . . ." So Y at (0,1). Row1: ". A Y . . ." Y at (1,2). Row2: "R . A Y . ." Y at (2,3). Row3: ". R . A Y ." Y at (3,4). Row4: ". . R . A Y" Y at (4,5). Row5: ". . . R . A" no Y. So Y forms a diagonal from (0,1) to (4,5) inclusive. That's length 5 cells. Starting at original Y location (0,1) and extending down-right until hitting edge? Grid size 6, so max row index 5, col 5. Starting at (0,1) diagonal positions: (0,1),(1,2),(2,3),(3,4),(4,5),(5,6 out of bounds). So stops at (4,5). Good. Now A appears: original at (1,1). In output: Row1 col1 A (original). Row2 col2 A. Row3 col3 A. Row4 col4 A. Row5 col5 A. That's diagonal from (1,1) to (5,5). So extends down-right until edge. R appears: original at (2,0). Output: Row2 col0 R (original). Row3 col1 R. Row4 col2 R. Row5 col3 R. That's diagonal from (2,0) to (5,3). So extends down-right. Thus rule: For each colored cell in input, copy it to output grid of size (input rows + input cols -1?) Actually input 3x3 => output 6x6. That's size = rows+cols? 3+3=6. So output dimension N = rows+cols? Let's test: If we have m rows, n cols, output size = m+n? Both dimensions equal? Output is square of size m+n? In example, both rows and cols become 6. So output is (m+n) x (m+n). Probably they create a larger grid where each diagonal line can be fully drawn without clipping. Starting positions are same as input coordinates within top-left corner of larger grid. So we embed input at top-left of larger grid, then extend each colored cell down-right until hitting bottom or right edge. Thus for test input 3x3 as well: ". . G", ". . .", ". Y W". Let's map coordinates: Rows 0-2, cols 0-2. Colored cells: (0,2)=G (2,1)=Y (2,2)=W Now output size will be 6x6 again. We need to place each color and extend diagonally down-right. Let's compute for each: G at (0,2). Diagonal positions: (0,2),(1,3),(2,4),(3,5),(4,6 out). So up to (3,5). So G appears at those coordinates. Y at (2,1). Diagonal: (2,1),(3,2),(4,3),(5,4),(6,5 out). So up to (5,4). W at (2,2). Diagonal: (2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6 out). Up to (5,5). Now we need to construct 6x6 grid with '.' for empty cells, and fill ... [1127 chars truncated]
"Signal flares launched from scattered positions in a dark battlefield arc toward the same compass bearing, each burning its color into the sky at regular intervals as it travels."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield map with a few colored signal positions.
Do: Each flare traces an identical trajectory from its launch point, marking its color at every interval along the way.
Grid: The battlefield map expands to track each flare's full flight path.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3? Example1 input grid 3x3: rows: ". Y ." ". A ." "R . ." Output is 6x6? Let's see output rows 6 columns each: ". Y . . . ." ". A Y . . ." "R . A Y . ." ". R . A Y ." ". . R . A Y" ". . . R . A" Observations: seems like we are extending diagonally? Input has three colored cells: Y at (0,1), A at (1,1), R at (2,0). Output appears to have a diagonal line of each color shifting? Let's map coordinates (row, col) zero-index. Input positions: Y at (0,1) A at (1,1) R at (2,0) Output 6x6 grid: Let's list non-black cells (non .). Row0: col1 Y. Row1: col1 A, col2 Y. Row2: col0 R, col2 A, col3 Y. Row3: col1 R, col3 A, col4 Y. Row4: col2 R, col4 A, col5 Y. Row5: col3 R, col5 A. Pattern: each color seems to propagate along a vector direction. For each original colored cell, we trace a line (trajectory) across grid, marking its color at each step. The description: "Each flare traces an identical trajectory from its launch point, marking its color at every interval along the way. Grid expands to track each flare's full flight path." Identical trajectory meaning same direction vector for all? Let's see vectors: For Y at (0,1) appears also at (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5) ... that's direction (+1,+1) (down-right). For A at (1,1) appears at (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5) also (+1,+1). For R at (2,0) appears at (3,1), (4,2), (5,3) also (+1,+1). So each original cell spawns a diagonal line down-right until hitting grid boundary. The output grid size is expanded to accommodate the longest line: original grid 3x3, but R at (2,0) plus 3 steps down-right gives row5 col3, so need 6 rows and 6 columns (since max col index 5). So rule: take input grid, for each non-blank cell, extend a line in direction (1,1) (south-east) adding copies of that color until hitting edge of expanded grid. The output grid size is such that all lines fit: size = original rows + original cols -1? For 3x3 => 5? Actually 3+3-? Output 6. Let's compute: max steps = max(row index + col index?) For each cell, the line length until bottom/right edge of expanded grid: we need to extend until row index reaches new height-1 and col index reaches new width-1 simultaneously? Since direction increments both, the line ends when either row or col would exceed bounds. To include all steps, we need size = original rows + original cols - 1? For 3+3-1=5, but output is 6. Let's test: maybe size = original rows + original cols? 3+3=6 matches. Let's test with positions: bottommost start row 2, col0. To extend to bottom-right corner, need rows = original rows + original cols - start col? Not sure. But we can apply to test input. Test Input 3x3: Row0: ". . G" Row1: ". . ." Row2: ". Y W" Positions: G at (0,2) Y at (2,1) W at (2,2) We will extend each down-right. First, determine needed output size. For each cell, the line will go until hitting bottom/right edge. The bottommost row index after extension = original rows -1 + (max possible steps). Since we can extend beyon ... [3490 chars truncated]
"Spotlights of different colors, mounted at various positions on the rigging, each cast a stepping diagonal of light across the darkened stage as the gel rotates."
120b: k=1
See: A dark stage grid with a few colored spotlights mounted at different positions.
Do: Each spotlight throws its color along a diagonal sequence of floor tiles, stepping one tile over and one tile down with each beat of the show.
Grid: The stage floor expands to catch every spotlight's full diagonal wash.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . Y . Row2: . A . Row3: R . . So positions: (0,1)=Y, (1,1)=A, (2,0)=R. Output grid appears larger: 6x6? Let's see output rows: Row1: . Y . . . . Row2: . A Y . . . Row3: R . A Y . . Row4: . R . A Y . Row5: . . R . A Y Row6: . . . R . A So output is 6x6. It seems each original colored cell creates a diagonal line down-right (south-east) of its color, extending until hitting edge of output grid. Also original positions maybe shifted? Let's map coordinates. Assume input grid placed top-left of output? Input 3x3 placed at top-left of 6x6? Let's map: Input (0,0) '.' corresponds output (0,0) '.'; (0,1) Y corresponds output (0,1) Y; (0,2) '.' corresponds output (0,2) '.'; So first row matches first three columns of output row1: . Y . matches. Output row1 has extra three '.' after column2? Actually row1: . Y . . . . So after column2 (index2) there are three more '.'. Row2 input: . A . ; output row2: . A Y . . . . Wait row2 output: ". A Y . . ." (6 columns). The first three columns: . A Y. Input had . A . . So output column2 (index2) is Y, which is from Y original at (0,1) shifted down one row? Indeed Y diagonal down-right from (0,1) goes to (1,2). That matches output row2 col2 (0-index). So Y appears at (1,2). Good. Row3 input: R . . ; output row3: R . A Y . . . First three columns: R . .? Actually output row3 first three: R . A. Input row3 first three: R . . So output col2 (index2) is A, which is from A at (1,1) shifted down two rows? A diagonal from (1,1) goes to (2,2). Yes. Also output row3 col3 (index3) is Y from (0,1) shifted down three rows? Actually Y from (0,1) down 3 rows to (3,2)? Wait coordinates: start (0,1). Down-right each step increments row and col by 1. So after 3 steps: (3,4). Not (2,3). Let's compute: (0,1) -> (1,2) -> (2,3) -> (3,4). So Y appears at (2,3) in output row3 col3? Row3 col3 index3 is Y indeed. So Y appears at (2,3). Good. Thus rule: For each colored cell in input, propagate its color along diagonal down-right across the output grid, filling cells. Output grid size seems to be input size + (max diagonal length?) Actually output is 6x6 for 3x3 input. That's double size? Maybe output size = input size *2? Let's test: Input 3 => output 6. Possibly output dimension = input dimension *2. Because diagonal propagation continues until reaching bottom or right edge of output grid, which is larger. How far does propagation go? For each source, we fill cells along diagonal until hitting bottom or right edge of output grid. Output grid size maybe determined by number of distinct colors? Let's compute needed size to accommodate longest diagonal from top-leftmost colored cell to bottom-rightmost after propagation. The farthest distance is number of colored cells? Not. Let's see: Input has colored cells at (0,1), (1,1), (2,0). The furthest down-right from (0,1) would be after steps equal to output rows-1 - row0 = 5 steps to row5, col would be ... [3049 chars truncated]
"Seeds planted at various spots in a garden bed send runners diagonally through the soil, sprouting identical blooms at every node until they reach the garden wall."
120b: k=1
See: A dark garden bed with a few colored flowers planted at scattered positions.
Do: Each flower sends a runner that produces a clone of itself at every step along a diagonal path through the bed.
Grid: The garden bed is extended to give every runner space to reach its full length.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Example1 input: Row1: . Y . Row2: . A . Row3: R . . Output is larger: appears 6x6? Let's map. Input positions: coordinates (row, col) 0-index. (0,1)=Y, (1,1)=A, (2,0)=R. Output grid 6x6: Row0: . Y . . . . Row1: . A Y . . . Row2: R . A Y . . Row3: . R . A Y . Row4: . . R . A Y Row5: . . . R . A Observations: It seems each colored cell spawns clones along a diagonal direction (maybe down-right?) The description: each flower sends a runner that produces a clone of itself at every step along a diagonal path through the bed. The garden bed is extended to give every runner space to reach its full length. So each original cell creates a diagonal line of same color extending down-right? Let's test: Y at (0,1) appears at (0,1) in output, also at (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). Indeed Y appears along diagonal down-right from its original position. In output, Y also appears at (0,1) original, then (1,2) row1 col2, (2,3), (3,4), (4,5). That's 5 Y's total. Output shows Y at those positions: row0 col1 Y, row1 col2 Y, row2 col3 Y, row3 col4 Y, row4 col5 Y. Yes. A at (1,1) appears at (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Indeed output shows A at those positions. R at (2,0) appears at (2,0), (3,1), (4,2), (5,3). Output shows R at those positions. Thus rule: For each non-black cell in input, extend a diagonal line down-right (south-east) until hitting grid boundary, filling with same color. The output grid size is extended to accommodate the longest diagonal from any original cell, i.e., size = original rows + original cols -1? Input 3x3 => output 6x6 (3+3). Indeed rows = cols = n+m-1 where n rows, m cols. So output is square of size (rows+cols-1). Fill with black '.' initially, then for each original colored cell at (r,c) (0-index), set cells (r + k, c + k) for k=0..(max) where within output dimensions. Thus for test input 3x3: Input: Row0: . . G Row1: . . . Row2: . Y W Positions: G at (0,2), Y at (2,1), W at (2,2). Also maybe others? No. We need output size 6x6. Create empty 6x6 '.'. Now for each: G at (0,2): diagonal positions (0,2), (1,3), (2,4), (3,5). (4,6) out of bounds (col 6). So fill those. Y at (2,1): positions (2,1), (3,2), (4,3), (5,4). (6,5) out. W at (2,2): positions (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5). Now we need to consider overlapping? Not in this case maybe overlapping none. Check if any same cell gets multiple colors: none. Now produce output rows 0-5 each with 6 columns. Let's construct. Initialize all '.'. Row0 col0-5: positions: col2 G. So row0: . . G . . . (col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 G col3 '.' col4 '.' col5 '.') Row1: G at (1,3). So row1: . . . G . . (col3 G) Row2: G at (2,4); Y at (2,1); W at (2,2). So row2 columns: col0 '.' col1 Y col2 W col3 '.' col4 G col5 '.' Thus row2: . Y W . G . Row3: G at (3,5); Y at (3,2); W at (3,3). So row3: col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 Y col3 W col4 '.' col5 G Row3: . . Y W . G Row4: Y at (4,3); W at (4,4). So row4: . . . Y W .? Wait also maybe G? No ... [407 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains cells of black (.), maroon (M), and yellow (Y). Yellow cells appear in pairs that share either the same row or the same column. Between each Y pair, the intervening cells are composed of M and . values. No orange (O) or azure (A) cells appear in the input.
Do: 1. Locate all yellow (Y) cells in the grid. 2. Match each Y cell with its partner: the other Y cell that lies in the same row or same column. Each Y belongs to exactly one pair. 3. For each Y pair, identify every cell strictly between them along their shared row or column. 4. Transform each intervening cell: replace maroon (M) with orange (O), and replace black (.) with azure (A). 5. Leave all other cells unchanged, including the Y cells themselves.
Grid: The grid dimensions vary across instances. The grid uses a sparse palette: black (.) as background, maroon (M) as structural fill, and yellow (Y) as boundary markers. Y cells always occur in pairs aligned along a single row or column. The output grid has the same dimensions as the input, with orange (O) and azure (A) appearing only in the segments between Y pairs.
"Yellow lanterns illuminate the corridor between them, revealing what the maroon shadows were hiding."
120b: k=3
See: A dark landscape of shadow (black) and maroon brick walls, with pairs of yellow lanterns mounted at key positions. Each lantern has a twin somewhere along its row or column, but the corridor between them sits unlit — you can only see the bricks and darkness filling the gap.
Do: When two lanterns face each other, their combined glow floods the corridor between them. The light transforms everything it touches: maroon bricks glow orange in the warmth, and the empty darkness brightens to azure, like a night sky at dawn. The lanterns themselves remain steady yellow — they are the source, not the subject, of the change.
Grid: The world is built from black emptiness and maroon masonry, with yellow lanterns always placed in facing pairs along a shared line. Outside the lanterns' shared gaze, everything stays as it was. Only the space caught between twin flames is transfigured — orange where brick stood, azure where nothing was.
We need to infer rule. From description: black '.' and maroon 'W'? Wait color key: . = black, B=blue, R=red, G=green, Y=yellow, X=grey, M=magenta, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon. In examples, we see only ., M, Y, O, A, etc. No W appears. So maroon is W but not used. In inputs, we have '.' (black), M (magenta), Y (yellow), O (orange), A (azure). In outputs, some cells change: In example1, input row2: Y O A O A A A A Y becomes output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So many changes. Let's analyze. We need to identify lanterns: yellow Y are sources. They appear in pairs along same row or column with only '.' (black) or maybe other colors between? The description: pairs of yellow lanterns mounted at key positions. Each lantern has a twin somewhere along its row or column, but the corridor between them sits unlit — you can only see the bricks and darkness filling the gap. When two lanterns face each other, their combined glow floods the corridor between them. The light transforms everything it touches: maroon bricks glow orange, and the empty darkness brightens to azure. Lanterns remain Y. Thus rule: For each pair of Y in same row or column with no other Y between them? The cells between them (exclusive) are transformed: any M (magenta) becomes O (orange) (since maroon bricks? Wait maroon is W, but we have M as magenta representing bricks? In description maroon bricks become orange. In grid, maroon is W but not present. However M is magenta maybe representing bricks. In examples, M cells between Y become O? Let's check. Example1: Input row2: Y O A O A A A A Y. Between the two Y's are O A O A A A A (positions 2-8). Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So O turned to M? A turned to .? Not matching description. Let's examine column wise maybe. Better to map colors: In description, maroon bricks (W) become orange (O). Empty darkness (.) becomes azure (A). So transformation: W -> O, . -> A. But we have M (magenta) maybe representing bricks? In examples, M appears a lot as background. Maybe M corresponds to maroon bricks? But color key says M=magenta, W=maroon. However maybe they used M as maroon bricks (since W not used). Let's test: In example1, between Y's there were O and A originally, not M. So maybe O and A are the transformed colors already? Wait input row2 had O and A already. Output row2 changed them to M and . . So transformation seems opposite: O -> M, A -> . (black). That suggests that the corridor between Y's is being "cleared" to something else? Let's examine other rows. Example1, row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y. Output row5: Y . M M M M . . Y. So between Y's, A O O O O A A become . M M M M . . . So A turned to . (black), O turned to M (magenta). So indeed rule: within corridor, O becomes M, A becomes . (black). So O (orange) becomes M (magenta) and A (azure) becomes . (black). That seems like shifting colors outward? Let's see other examples. Example2: Input row6: Y . . M M M M . Y. Output row6: Y A A O O O O A Y. So between Y's, . . M ... [9160 chars truncated]
"Twin enzymes activate along a membrane, inverting the polarity of every protein caught between their binding sites."
120b: k=2
See: A tissue of dark and maroon cells, with rare yellow enzyme markers embedded in rows or columns.
Do: Each enzyme finds its twin along their shared axis. The cellular material trapped between them undergoes a reaction — its chemical identity flips to a complementary form.
Grid: Yellow markers remain fixed. Between paired enzymes, maroon transforms to orange and black transforms to azure. All other cells are inert.
We need to decode puzzle. We have colors: . = black, M = magenta, Y = yellow, O = orange, A = azure, W = maroon. The description: "tissue of dark and maroon cells, with rare yellow enzyme markers embedded in rows or columns." Dark likely black (.)? maroon is W. But in grids we see . and M and Y etc. Actually . is black, M is magenta, Y is yellow, O orange, A azure, W maroon. In examples, input contains . M Y O A etc. No W appears. So maroon maybe represented by M? Wait M is magenta, not maroon. But description may be metaphorical not matching colors. Let's examine transformation: "Each enzyme finds its twin along their shared axis. The cellular material trapped between them undergoes a reaction — its chemical identity flips to a complementary form. Grid details: Yellow markers remain fixed. Between paired enzymes, maroon transforms to orange and black transforms to azure. All other cells are inert." Thus: Yellow cells (Y) are fixed. For each pair of Y markers that are aligned either in same row or same column (i.e., share axis), we consider the cells between them (exclusive). Those cells that are maroon become orange, black become azure. Others unchanged. We need to map colors: Which symbols correspond to maroon, orange, black, azure? In key: . = black, O = orange, A = azure, W = maroon. But we also have M = magenta. In examples, transformation appears to change some cells from M to something else? Let's examine Example1. Input grid (10x9? Actually rows count). Let's write first few rows. Example1 Input: Row1: . M . M M . M . M Row2: Y O A O A A A A Y Row3: . M M M M M M M . Row4: . . M . M M . . M Row5: Y A O O O O A A Y Row6: . . . . M . . . M Row7: M . M . M . . M . Row8: Y O A A O A O O Y Row9: M M . M . M M . . Output: Row1: . M . M M . M . M (unchanged) Row2: Y M . M . . . . Y Row3: . M M M M M M M . Row4: . . M . M M . . M Row5: Y . M M M M . . Y Row6: . . . . M . . . M Row7: M . M . M . . M . Row8: Y M . . M . M M Y Row9: M M . M . M M . . We need to see changes: In row2 input: Y O A O A A A A Y -> output: Y M . M . . . . Y. So between the Y's (row2 col1 and col9) there are cells col2-8. The Y's are in same row, so axis row. Between them, original cells: O A O A A A A. According to rule, maroon transforms to orange, black to azure. But we see O (orange) became M (magenta)?? A (azure) became . (black). So mapping: maybe maroon = M? Wait original had O and A, output has M and . So O->M, A->. So O (orange) turned into M (magenta) and A (azure) turned into . (black). That suggests the transformation is swapping orange<->magenta and azure<->black? But description said maroon transforms to orange and black transforms to azure. Not matching. Let's examine other rows where changes happen: Row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y -> output: Y . M M M M . . Y. So between Y's, we have A O O O O A A. Output: . M M M M . . .? Actually output row5: Y . M M M M . . Y (col2 '.'; col3 M; col4 M; col5 M; col6 M; col7 '.'; col8 '.' ... [9264 chars truncated]
"Binary yellow dwarfs orbit along the same plane, and every body caught in their tidal corridor undergoes spectral shift."
120b: fail
See: A star chart of void and maroon nebulae, with yellow dwarf stars positioned along shared axes.
Do: Each yellow dwarf is gravitationally bound to its twin along the same orbital plane. Matter between them is tidally stressed — its spectral signature shifts to a complementary wavelength.
Grid: Yellow dwarfs hold position. Between paired stars, maroon nebulae shift to orange and void becomes azure. Space outside the corridors is unaffected.
We need to infer rule. Let's decode metaphor: Yellow dwarfs (Y) are paired along same row or column? "twin along the same orbital plane" meaning each Y has another Y in same row or column? Between them, maroon nebulae (W) shift to orange (O) and void (.) becomes azure (A). In examples, we need to see mapping. We have colors: . black, M magenta, Y yellow, O orange, A azure, W maroon. In examples, input contains . M Y O A W? Let's examine Example1 input and output. I'll write rows with indices. Example1 Input (10x9? Actually seems 9 columns? Let's count first row: ". M . M M . M . M" that's 9 items. So grid 9x9? Let's count rows: there are 9 rows. Yes 9x9. I'll map coordinates. Row1: . M . M M . M . M Row2: Y O A O A A A A Y Row3: . M M M M M M M . Row4: . . M . M M . . M Row5: Y A O O O O A A Y Row6: . . . . M . . . M Row7: M . M . M . . M . Row8: Y O A A O A O O Y Row9: M M . M . M M . . Output rows: Row1 same as input. Row2: Y M . M . . . . Y Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: Y . M M M M . . Y Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8: Y M . . M . M M Y Row9 same. So changes occur only rows with Y's (rows 2,5,8). In those rows, Y's stay Y. Between paired Y's, the cells originally were O, A, etc become something else: In row2 input: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output: Y M . M . . . . Y. So between the two Y's (positions col1 and col9), the interior cells changed: O->M, A->., etc. Let's see mapping: Input col2 O becomes M. col3 A becomes . . col4 O becomes M. col5 A becomes . . col6 A becomes . . col7 A becomes . . col8 A becomes . . So pattern: O -> M, A -> . . So O turned to M (magenta), A turned to . (black). Also note that original M cells elsewhere unchanged. Row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y. Output: Y . M M M M . . Y. So mapping: A -> . (col2), O -> M (col3-6), A -> . (col7-8). So same mapping. Row8 input: Y O A A O A O O Y. Output: Y M . . M . M M Y. Let's map: col2 O->M, col3 A->., col4 A->., col5 O->M, col6 A->., col7 O->M, col8 O->M. So consistent. Thus rule: For each row that contains exactly two Y's (maybe more?), treat the segment between them (exclusive) and transform: O (orange) becomes M (magenta), A (azure) becomes . (black). Also maybe other colors? In examples only O and A appear between Y's. Also note that in row2 there were also O and A only. So transformation: O->M, A->. . Also maybe W (maroon) becomes O? Not in examples. Now Example2: Input grid size? Let's count rows: 7 rows, each 9 columns? Row1: ". M . . . M M . ." (9). Row2: "M M M M M M M M M". Row3: ". M M M M . . . ." Row4: "M M . . . M M . ." Row5: ". M M M . . M . M" Row6: "Y . . M M M M . Y" Row7: ". M M M . M M . ." Output: rows 1-5 same as input, row6 changed, row7 same. Row6 input: Y . . M M M M . Y Output: Y A A O O O O A Y So between Y's (col1 and col9) interior cells: col2 '.' becomes A, col3 '.' becomes A, col4 M becomes O, col5 M becomes O, col6 M becomes O, col7 M becomes O, col8 '.' becomes A. So mapping: . (black) -> A (a ... [10052 chars truncated]
"Golden buoys mark the channel entrance and exit, and everything between them is charted in the harbor master's colors."
120b: k=3
See: A sea chart of deep water and maroon shallows, with golden buoys anchored at points along rows or columns.
Do: Each buoy is paired with the one marking the other end of its channel. The water between them is recharted — depths and shallows are recolored to show safe passage.
Grid: Buoys stay gold. Between paired buoys, maroon shallows become orange and deep water becomes azure. Waters outside marked channels keep their original chart colors.
We need to infer rule. From description: gold buoys = Y? Wait color key: Y=yellow, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon, M=magenta, etc. In description: "gold buoys" likely Y (yellow). "maroon shallows" = W. "deep water" = black? Actually black is '.' (black). In description: "deep water and maroon shallows, with golden buoys". So deep water = '.' (black). Maroon shallows = W (maroon). But in grids we have no W in examples. Actually examples have only . M Y O A etc. No W. So maybe maroon is represented by M? Wait M is magenta. But description says maroon shallows become orange (O) and deep water becomes azure (A). In examples, transformation changes some cells from Y, O, A, etc. Let's examine Example1. Input grid (I'll write coordinates). Example1 Input rows: 1: . M . M M . M . M 2: Y O A O A A A A Y 3: . M M M M M M M . 4: . . M . M M . . M 5: Y A O O O O A A Y 6: . . . . M . . . M 7: M . M . M . . M . 8: Y O A A O A O O Y 9: M M . M . M M . . Output rows: 1: . M . M M . M . M (same) 2: Y M . M . . . . Y 3: . M M M M M M M . (same) 4: . . M . M M . . M (same) 5: Y . M M M M . . Y 6: . . . . M . . . M (same) 7: M . M . M . . M . (same) 8: Y M . . M . M M Y 9: M M . M . M M . . (same) Observations: Only rows 2,5,8 changed (those containing Y at ends). The Y's remain at ends (first and last column). Between them, transformation occurs: original row2: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So between Y's, original colors O, A etc changed to M or . etc. Let's see mapping: O->M? A->. ? Let's map positions: col2: O -> M col3: A -> . col4: O -> M col5: A -> . col6: A -> . col7: A -> . col8: A -> . So O became M, A became . (black). In row5: input Y A O O O O A A Y -> output Y . M M M M . . Y. So A->., O->M. Row8: input Y O A A O A O O Y -> output Y M . . M . M M Y. So O->M, A->. consistent. Thus rule: For rows that have Y at both ends (buoys), between them, replace O (orange) with M (magenta) and A (azure) with . (black). Also maybe other colors? In example2, input row6: Y . . M M M M . Y -> output Y A A O O O O A Y. So here Y at ends, between them there were . . M M M M . .? Wait row6 input: Y . . M M M M . Y (9 columns). Output: Y A A O O O O A Y. So mapping: . -> A, M -> O. So transformation swapped: deep water '.' becomes azure A, and magenta M becomes orange O. But earlier example1 had '.' unchanged (since not between Y?). Actually row2 had no '.' originally, only O and A. So rule may be: between Y buoys, swap colors: O<->M? Wait earlier O became M, A became . . In example2, . became A, M became O. That's different mapping. Let's examine example3. Input rows with Y at ends? Row1: M . M Y M . . Y M (Y at col4 and col8). Output row1 unchanged (since Y not at ends? Actually Y not at ends). Row2: M . M . . M . . M (no Y). Row3: . M M . . . . M . (no Y). Row4: M M M . . . . M M (no Y). Row5: M . . M M . . . M (no Y). Row6: M M M Y . M M Y . (Y at col4 and col8? Actually row6: M M M Y ... [10208 chars truncated]
"Gold terminals define the endpoints of a circuit trace, and the components between them light up when current flows."
120b: fail
See: A circuit board of empty pads and maroon resistors, with gold terminals at certain positions along traces.
Do: Each terminal is connected to its mate along the same trace. When power is applied, every component between them activates — changing state to show current is flowing.
Grid: Gold terminals stay. Between paired terminals, maroon resistors glow orange and empty pads glow azure. Components off the active traces remain dark.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output grids same size? Example 1 input appears 9x9? Let's count rows: given lines: ". M . M M . M . M" (9) "Y O A O A A A A Y" (9) ". M M M M M M M ." (9) ". . M . M M . . M" (9) "Y A O O O O A A Y" (9) ". . . . M . . . M" (9) "M . M . M . . M ." (9) "Y O A A O A O O Y" (9) "M M . M . M M . ." (9) So 9x9. Output also 9x9. We need to see transformation: According to metaphor, gold terminals (maybe O? gold?) stay. Between paired terminals along same trace, maroon resistors (W?) become orange (O) and empty pads become azure (A). But in color key, maroon is W, orange is O, azure is A. In example, input has Y, O, A, M, etc. Need mapping. Let's identify which are terminals: "gold terminals" maybe Y? In description gold terminals at certain positions along traces. In input, there are Y's at borders. In output, Y's remain? Let's compare. Row1 input: . M . M M . M . M Row1 output: . M . M M . M . M (unchanged) Row2 input: Y O A O A A A A Y Row2 output: Y M . M . . . . Y So Y at ends stayed Y. O and A changed to M, ., etc. So terminals maybe Y? They stay Y. Between them, along same trace, resistors (W) become O and empty pads become A. But we see M appears where O was? Actually O turned to M. M is magenta. In input, there are many M's (magenta) maybe represent empty pads? Wait color key: . = black, B=blue, R=red, G=green, Y=yellow, X=grey, M=magenta, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon. In example, input has M, O, A, Y, . . Output has M, Y, ., etc. So transformation seems to replace O and A with something else based on connections. Let's examine trace concept: maybe each row/column forms a trace connecting two Y's (terminals). Between Y's, we fill with something? In row2, Y at col1 and col9. Between them, there are O A O A A A A A. Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So positions: col2 became M, col3 became ., col4 M, rest . . . . . So pattern maybe alternating? Not clear. Look at column wise? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 1-9, cols 1-9. Input grid: I'll write matrix. R1: c1 .,2 M,3 .,4 M,5 M,6 .,7 M,8 .,9 M R2: 1 Y,2 O,3 A,4 O,5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 Y R3: 1 .,2 M,3 M,4 M,5 M,6 M,7 M,8 M,9 . R4: 1 .,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 M,6 M,7 .,8 .,9 M R5: 1 Y,2 A,3 O,4 O,5 O,6 O,7 A,8 A,9 Y R6: 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 M,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 M R7: 1 M,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 M,6 .,7 .,8 M,9 . R8: 1 Y,2 O,3 A,4 A,5 O,6 A,7 O,8 O,9 Y R9: 1 M,2 M,3 .,4 M,5 .,6 M,7 M,8 .,9 . Output grid: R1 same as input. R2: Y M . M . . . . Y R3 same as input. R4 same as input. R5: Y . M M M M . . Y R6 same as input. R7 same as input. R8: Y M . . M . M M Y R9 same as input. So only rows 2,5,8 changed. Those rows contain Y at ends and have O/A mixture. So rule: For each row that starts and ends with Y (terminals), we process the interior cells: maybe we find pairs of O (orange) that act as terminals? Actually O are orange (maybe resistors). In row2, interior pattern O A O A A A A A. Output becomes M . M . . . . . . Wait output row2 interior: col2 M, col3 ., col4 M, r ... [4836 chars truncated]
"Golden idols face each other across a sacred corridor, and all who walk between them are transfigured by the gods' gaze."
120b: k=2
See: A temple floor of dark stone and maroon tiles, with golden idols placed along certain rows or columns.
Do: Each idol is paired with the one it faces along the same axis. Mortals and materials between them are transformed by divine radiance into new sacred forms.
Grid: Golden idols endure. Between facing idols, maroon tiles become orange and dark stone becomes azure. The profane spaces beyond remain unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Let's decode metaphor: golden idols = maybe 'Y' (yellow) or 'O' (orange) or 'A' azure? Actually colors: Y=yellow, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon. In description: "golden idols placed along certain rows or columns." Golden likely 'Y' (yellow) maybe representing gold. In examples, we see Y present in input and output. Let's examine Example1. Input grid 9x9? Let's list rows with characters. Example1 Input rows: 1: . M . M M . M . M 2: Y O A O A A A A Y 3: . M M M M M M M . 4: . . M . M M . . M 5: Y A O O O O A A Y 6: . . . . M . . . M 7: M . M . M . . M . 8: Y O A A O A O O Y 9: M M . M . M M . . Output rows: 1: . M . M M . M . M (same) 2: Y M . M . . . . Y 3: . M M M M M M M . 4: . . M . M M . . M (same) 5: Y . M M M M . . Y 6: . . . . M . . . M (same) 7: M . M . M . . M . (same) 8: Y M . . M . M M Y 9: M M . M . M M . . Observations: Rows 2,5,8 changed. Those rows contain Y at both ends (golden idols). In each such row, between the Y's there are other colors (O, A, etc). The rule: For each row that has Y at both ends (facing idols), transform the cells between them: maroon tiles become orange and dark stone becomes azure. Need mapping of colors: In key, W=maroon, . =black (dark stone), M=magenta, O=orange, A=azure, Y=yellow (idol). In example, between Y's originally row2: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So O turned into M? A turned into .? Let's map: O->M, A->. (makes sense: maroon tiles become orange? Wait maroon is W, not present. But maybe M (magenta) is maroon? Actually key says M=magenta, W=maroon. So maroon tiles are W, not present. Hmm. But transformation described: "Between facing idols, maroon tiles become orange and dark stone becomes azure." So maroon (W) -> orange (O). Dark stone (.) -> azure (A). However in example, we see O->M and A->. So opposite? Let's examine other rows. Row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y Output: Y . M M M M . . Y Mapping: A->., O->M. Same as before. Row8 input: Y O A A O A O O Y Output: Y M . . M . M M Y Mapping: O->M, A->., consistent. Thus rule: Between Y's, O becomes M, A becomes . (dot). So O->M, A->., while other colors unchanged? In row2, there were also maybe other colors? Only O and A. So transformation is swapping O and A with M and . respectively. Now what about columns? Possibly also vertical facing idols (Y at top and bottom of column). Let's check if any column transformation occurs. Look at column positions where Y at both top and bottom? In example1, column1: rows1 '.' row2 Y row3 '.' row4 '.' row5 Y row6 '.' row7 M row8 Y row9 M. Not both ends Y (top row1 '.' not Y). Column9: row1 M row2 Y row3 '.' row4 M row5 Y row6 M row7 . row8 Y row9 . . Not both Y. But maybe transformation also applies to columns where Y at both ends (top and bottom). Let's see if any column changed besides rows. Compare column values between input and output for changed rows: For row2 col2 originally O becomes M (changed). Row2 col3 A becomes . ... [9168 chars truncated]
"Partners in gold hold their positions at the ends of a formation line, and every dancer between them mirrors into the complementary pose."
120b: k=3
See: A dance floor of empty positions and maroon-costumed dancers, with gold-costumed anchors at certain points along rows or columns.
Do: Each gold anchor finds their partner along the same line. The dancers between them perform the mirror transformation — each takes on the complementary costume and pose.
Grid: Gold anchors hold still. Between paired anchors, maroon dancers become orange and empty positions become azure. Dancers outside the formation lines don't move.
We need to infer rule. From description: gold anchors = maybe Y? Actually gold color is not in key; but description says gold-costumed anchors. In key, gold not defined. But maybe Y (yellow) is gold? In examples, Y appears as anchor? Let's examine. Example1 Input and Output differences: Let's write rows. Ex1 Input row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y" Output row2: "Y M . M . . . . Y" So Y at ends remain Y (gold anchors). Between them, O (orange) and A (azure) become something: output has M and . etc. Let's map. Positions: columns 1-9. Input row2: col1 Y (anchor), col2 O, col3 A, col4 O, col5 A, col6 A, col7 A, col8 A, col9 Y. Output row2: col1 Y unchanged, col2 M, col3 ., col4 M, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 ., col9 Y unchanged. So between Y anchors, O turned to M, A turned to . (black). Also note transformation seems like mirror? Let's see row5 Input: "Y A O O O O A A Y" Output row5: "Y . M M M M . . Y". So between Y anchors, A becomes ., O becomes M. So rule: between two Y anchors on same row, replace O with M, A with . (maybe also other colors?). Also maybe swap? Let's check row8 Input: "Y O A A O A O O Y" Output row8: "Y M . . M . M M Y". So O->M, A->., but also note pattern: positions: O M, A ., A ., O M, A ., O M, O M. Yes matches. Thus Y are gold anchors. The transformation: between a pair of Y on same row, O becomes M, A becomes . . Also maybe other colors like B,R,G,X,W? Not present. Now also column anchors? Example2: Input row6: "Y . . M M M M . Y" Output row6: "Y A A O O O O A Y". So between Y anchors on row6, . becomes A, M becomes O? Wait input row6: columns: Y, ., ., M, M, M, M, ., Y. Output: Y, A, A, O, O, O, O, A, Y. So transformation: . -> A, M -> O. So rule depends on which colors are between anchors: they get swapped to complementary colors: maybe mapping: M<->O, A<->. (black). Indeed earlier O->M, A->., and .->A, M->O. So it's a mirror transformation swapping each color with its complement: M<->O, A<->. (black). That matches description: "maroon dancers become orange and empty positions become azure." Wait maroon is W? Actually maroon is W per key. But in examples, maroon not present. However description says maroon dancers become orange and empty become azure. In key, maroon = W, orange = O, azure = A, empty = . (black). But in examples, we see . (black) becomes A (azure) and M (magenta) becomes O (orange). So maybe maroon is M? But key says M=magenta. Hmm maybe metaphor uses maroon but actual color is magenta. So mapping: M (magenta) <-> O (orange), . (black) <-> A (azure). Y are gold anchors. Thus rule: For each row that contains at least two Y, consider the segment between the leftmost and rightmost Y (including maybe multiple Y pairs?). In examples, there are Y at both ends of row. Could be multiple Y pairs per row? In example1 row2 had Y at both ends only. Row5 also. Row8 also. So transformation applied to all cells between the outermost Y's (including interior Y? ... [7819 chars truncated]
"Sulfur crystals mark the vents at either end of a fissure, and the mineral deposits between them are pressure-cooked into new ores."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cross-section of bedrock and maroon mineral veins, with yellow sulfur crystals deposited along certain rows or columns.
Do: Each sulfur crystal is paired with the one sharing its fissure. Geothermal pressure transforms everything between them — minerals and voids alike are metamorphosed into new formations.
Grid: Sulfur crystals persist. Between paired crystals, maroon minerals become orange ore and dark bedrock becomes azure crystal. Strata outside the fissures are unaltered.
"Saffron clamps seal the edges of a pastry fold, and the filling between them caramelizes into new colors under the heat."
120b: k=3
See: A sheet of dough made from dark and maroon patches, with yellow saffron pins holding certain seams.
Do: Find each pair of saffron pins along their shared fold line. The filling between them changes character — what was dense becomes bright, what was hollow becomes glazed.
Grid: Saffron pins stay. Between matched pins, maroon filling turns orange and dark filling turns azure. The rest of the pastry is untouched.
We need to infer rule. From description: "sheet of dough made from dark and maroon patches, with yellow saffron pins holding certain seams." Colors: dark = maybe black? maroon = W? In key, W=maroon. Yellow = Y. So saffron pins are Y. Dark patches maybe black '.'? Actually '.' is black. So dough made from dark (.) and maroon (W) patches. But in examples, we see only '.' and M, Y, O, A etc. No W appears. So maybe maroon corresponds to M? Wait M is magenta. But description says maroon patches. However examples use M heavily. So maybe M stands for maroon? But key says M=magenta. Could be metaphorical mismatch. Anyway. Rule: Find each pair of Y along their shared fold line. Between them, maroon filling turns orange and dark filling turns azure. The rest unchanged. So Y pins stay. Between matched Y pins, W (maroon) becomes O (orange) and . (dark) becomes A (azure). In examples, we need to see mapping. Example1: Input grid 9x9? Let's compare input vs output to see changes. I'll write coordinates. Let's parse example1 input rows: Row0: . M . M M . M . M Row1: Y O A O A A A A Y Row2: . M M M M M M M . Row3: . . M . M M . . M Row4: Y A O O O O A A Y Row5: . . . . M . . . M Row6: M . M . M . . M . Row7: Y O A A O A O O Y Row8: M M . M . M M . . Output rows: Row0 same as input. Row1: Y M . M . . . . Y Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4: Y . M M M M . . Y Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7: Y M . . M . M M Y Row8 same. So changes occur only in rows with Y at ends (row1, row4, row7). In each such row, the Y's remain Y. Between them, some cells changed: originally row1 had O A O A A A A A between Y's. Output row1 becomes M . M . . . . . . Wait output row1: Y M . M . . . . Y (positions 0-8). Let's map: Input row1: [0]Y,1 O,2 A,3 O,4 A,5 A,6 A,7 A,8 Y. Output: 0 Y,1 M,2 .,3 M,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 Y. So O turned to M? A turned to .? Let's see mapping: O->M, A->. . Indeed O became M, A became . (dot). That matches description: maroon filling turns orange? Wait O is orange, M is magenta. So maybe maroon (M) becomes orange (O) and dark (.) becomes azure (A). But here O became M (reverse). Let's examine other rows. Row4 input: Y A O O O O A A Y. Output: Y . M M M M . . Y. So A->., O->M. Same mapping. Row7 input: Y O A A O A O O Y. Output: Y M . . M . M M Y. So O->M, A->. . Yes. Thus rule: Between each pair of Y in same row (i.e., horizontally), replace O with M, and A with . . The rest unchanged. Also Y stay. What about other colors like B,R,G,X,W? Not present. Now check Example2: Input rows 7x9? Let's see row5 (index5) has Y . . M M M M . Y. Output row5: Y A A O O O O A Y. So between Y's, . became A, M became O? Wait mapping reversed? Let's examine. Input row5: Y . . M M M M . Y Output row5: Y A A O O O O A Y So . -> A, M -> O. That's opposite of previous mapping. Hmm maybe orientation matters: In example2, the Y's are vertical? Let's see grid shape: Example2 input rows: Row0: . M . . . M M . . Row1: M M M M M M M M M Row2: . M M M M . . . . Row3 ... [9937 chars truncated]
"Golden tuning forks resonate across the staff, and every note caught in their vibration shifts to its harmonic complement."
120b: fail
See: A musical grid of rests and maroon notes, punctuated by rare golden tuning forks.
Do: Each tuning fork finds its partner on the same staff line or measure column. The notes vibrating between them are transposed — each voice shifts to its complementary register.
Grid: Tuning forks hold their pitch. Between resonating pairs, maroon notes become orange and rests become azure. Notes outside the resonance are unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's decode colors: . black, M magenta, Y yellow, O orange, A azure, etc. In description: "maroon notes" correspond to W? Actually color key: W=maroon. In example input there is no W. So maybe maroon notes are represented by something else? In description: "rare golden tuning forks" maybe color G=green? golden? but gold not in key. Maybe Y=yellow? golden? hmm. We need to map transformation: "Each tuning fork finds its partner on the same staff line or measure column. The notes vibrating between them are transposed — each voice shifts to its complementary register. Between resonating pairs, maroon notes become orange and rests become azure. Notes outside the resonance are unchanged." Interpretation: There are two special elements: tuning forks (golden) and maroon notes (W). Between each pair of tuning forks aligned horizontally or vertically, the cells between them (excluding the forks themselves) get transformed: maroon (W) -> orange (O), rests (.) -> azure (A). Others unchanged. Also tuning forks hold their pitch (stay same). Notes outside resonance unchanged. In example, we need to see which colors correspond to tuning forks and maroon notes. Look at input vs output differences. Example1 Input vs Output: Let's write rows with indices. Row0: ". M . M M . M . M" Output row0 same: ". M . M M . M . M" unchanged. Row1 input: "Y O A O A A A A Y" Output row1: "Y M . M . . . . Y" So many changes. Let's compare each column. Columns 0-8. Input row1 col0 Y stays Y (same). col1 O -> M. col2 A -> . . col3 O -> M. col4 A -> . . col5 A -> . . col6 A -> . . col7 A -> . . col8 Y stays Y. So O turned into M, A turned into . (black). That's opposite of description (maroon to orange, rests to azure). So maybe mapping different. Let's see other rows. Row2 input: ". M M M M M M M ." Output same unchanged. Row3 input: ". . M . M M . . M" Output same unchanged. Row4 input: "Y A O O O O A A Y" Output: "Y . M M M M . . Y" So changes: col1 A -> . ; col2 O -> M ; col3 O -> M ; col4 O -> M ; col5 O -> M ; col6 A -> . ; col7 A -> . . So O->M, A->., similar. Row5 input: ". . . . M . . . M" Output same unchanged. Row6 input: "M . M . M . . M ." Output same unchanged. Row7 input: "Y O A A O A O O Y" Output: "Y M . . M . M M Y" Changes: O->M, A->., A->., O->M, A->., O->M, O->M. Row8 input: "M M . M . M M . ." Output: "M M . M . M M . .": unchanged. Thus transformation only occurs in rows 1,4,7 (maybe columns also). Those rows contain O and A. O becomes M, A becomes . . So O (orange?) becomes M (magenta). A (azure) becomes . (black). So O and A are being transformed, not W. Thus perhaps "tuning forks" are O (orange) and "maroon notes" are W but not present. However transformation says between resonating pairs, maroon notes become orange and rests become azure. But we see opposite: orange becomes magenta, azure becomes black. So maybe our ma ... [5555 chars truncated]
"Yellow cones mark the ends of a drill lane, and every player caught between them switches to the alternate jersey."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A practice field grid of open ground and maroon-shirted players, with yellow cones placed at intervals along rows or columns.
Do: Each cone is paired with the other cone sharing its lane. Every player and every patch of ground between them takes on the opposite team's colors.
Grid: Cones stay fixed. Between paired cones, maroon jerseys become orange and open ground becomes azure. Outside the drill lanes, nothing changes.
"Twin lightning rods channel a storm between them, and the atmosphere in their corridor is supercharged into new states of matter."
120b: k=3
See: A sky-map of dark clouds and maroon storm cells, with yellow lightning rods anchored at certain points along rows or columns.
Do: Each rod discharges toward its partner along their shared axis. The weather between them is transformed — dense matter becomes radiant, and voids become electrified.
Grid: Lightning rods remain. Between paired rods, maroon cells become orange and dark cells become azure. The rest of the sky is unaffected.
We need to infer rule. From description: yellow lightning rods anchored at certain points along rows or columns. Each rod discharges toward its partner along their shared axis. Between paired rods, maroon cells become orange and dark cells become azure. In color key, maroon = W, orange = O, dark cells? "dark cells" maybe black '.'? Actually black is '.' (black). Azure = A. So between paired yellow rods (Y) along same row or column, the cells between them transform: maroon (W) become orange (O), and black (.) become azure (A). The rods (Y) remain unchanged. Rest unchanged. Check examples. We need to map colors: Input uses M (magenta), Y (yellow), O (orange), A (azure), etc. Also there is '.' black. No W in examples? Actually maroon is W but not present. In examples, maybe maroon cells are represented by M? Wait M is magenta per key. But description says maroon storm cells. However training uses M heavily. So maybe M corresponds to maroon? But key says M=magenta. Hmm maybe metaphor uses maroon but actual color is magenta. So "maroon cells" correspond to M in grid. And "dark cells" correspond to '.' (black). The transformation: between paired Y rods, M become O, '.' become A. Let's test. Example1 Input vs Output. Let's locate Y positions in Example1 Input. Row1: ". M . M M . M . M" no Y. Row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y" Y at col1 and col9 (assuming 9 columns). So a pair along same row. Between them columns 2-8. In input between them we have O A O A A A A. Output row2: "Y M . M . . . . Y". So transformation: O->M? A->. ? Let's see mapping: Input col2 O becomes M. col3 A becomes . . col4 O becomes M. col5 A becomes . col6 A becomes . col7 A becomes . col8 A becomes . So pattern: O turned into M, A turned into . . That's not matching earlier rule. But maybe the rule is: between Y rods, O become M, A become . (i.e., orange to magenta, azure to black). However description said maroon become orange, dark become azure. That would be opposite direction. Let's examine other rows. Row5 input: "Y A O O O O A A Y". Output row5: "Y . M M M M . . Y". So between Y's, A becomes . (black), O becomes M (magenta). Yes matches: O->M, A->. So transformation: O (orange) becomes M (magenta), A (azure) becomes . (black). That is opposite of description but matches examples. Now also note that in rows where Y are in columns (vertical pairs) maybe similar. Check Example2: Input row6: "Y . . M M M M . Y". Output row6: "Y A A O O O O A Y". So between Y's, '.' become A, M become O. Wait earlier we saw O->M, A->. but now '.'->A, M->O. That's different. Let's analyze: In this case, the Y's are at row6 col1 and col9 (same row). Between them columns 2-8: ". . M M M M .". Output: "A A O O O O A". So '.' became A, M became O. So transformation: '.' -> A, M -> O. That's consistent with earlier rule? In previous example, between Y's we had O and A, not '.' and M. So maybe rule depends on which colors are present between Y's: they swap: O<->M, A< ... [9287 chars truncated]
"Gold keystones brace opposite ends of an archway, and the masonry between them is revealed as stained glass when the scaffolding falls."
120b: fail
See: A wall of dark mortar and maroon bricks, with gold keystones set into certain rows or columns.
Do: Each keystone is paired with its counterpart across the arch. When the scaffolding is removed, every brick and gap between them is revealed in its true luminous colors.
Grid: Keystones stay gold. Between matched keystones, maroon bricks become orange glass and dark mortar becomes azure glass. The rest of the wall is unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Let's decode metaphor: keystones are gold (maybe Y? Actually gold color maybe Y? In key, Y=yellow. Gold likely Y. In examples, keystones are Y? Let's examine Example1 input and output. Input grid 9x9? Let's list rows with characters. Row1: ". M . M M . M . M" Row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y" Row3: ". M M M M M M M ." Row4: ". . M . M M . . M" Row5: "Y A O O O O A A Y" Row6: ". . . . M . . . M" Row7: "M . M . M . . M ." Row8: "Y O A A O A O O Y" Row9: "M M . M . M M . ." Output rows: Row1 same as input. Row2: "Y M . M . . . . Y" Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: "Y . M M M M . . Y" Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8: "Y M . . M . M M Y" Row9: "M M . M . M M . ." Observations: Y's (gold) remain Y in output (keystones stay gold). Indeed rows 2,5,8 have Y at ends unchanged. Between matched keystones (across the arch) maroon bricks become orange glass and dark mortar becomes azure glass. In key, maroon = W, orange = O, dark mortar = . (black), azure = A. In example, maroon bricks are W? But there is no W in input. Actually input uses M (magenta), O (orange), A (azure), Y (yellow), . (black). So maybe mapping different: In metaphor, maroon bricks correspond to M? Wait color key: M=magenta, W=maroon. So maroon bricks are W, but not present. So maybe metaphor uses different colors: "maroon bricks" correspond to M (magenta) maybe? And "dark mortar" is . (black). "gold keystones" are Y (yellow). "orange glass" is O (orange). "azure glass" is A (azure). That matches: In input, we have M, O, A, Y, . . Output changes some M to O? Let's see. In row2 input: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So between the Y's (keystones) there were O A O A A A A A. They transformed to M . M . . . . . . Wait not exactly. Let's identify "matched keystones across the arch". Possibly each Y pairs with another Y in same row? In row2, Y at column1 and column9. So the segment between them (columns 2-8) is transformed: M becomes? Actually original had O A O A A A A A. Output has M . M . . . . . . So O turned to M, A turned to . (black). So O->M, A->. That's like swapping colors: O (orange) becomes M (magenta) which is "maroon bricks become orange glass"? Not matching. Let's examine row5: Input row5: Y A O O O O A A Y. Output row5: Y . M M M M . . Y. So between Y's, A O O O O A A transformed to . M M M M . . . Wait output: columns: 2 '.' (was A), 3 M (was O), 4 M (O),5 M (O),6 M (O),7 '.' (A),8 '.' (A). So O->M, A->. again. Row8: Input: Y O A A O A O O Y. Output: Y M . . M . M M Y. So O->M, A->., O->M, A->., O->M, O->M? Let's map: columns: 2 O->M,3 A->.,4 A->.,5 O->M,6 A->.,7 O->M,8 O->M. Yes O->M, A->. So rule: Between the two Y's in a row, replace O with M, replace A with . (black). Keep Y unchanged. What about other rows without Y? They stay same (row1,3,4,6,7,9 unchanged). Indeed row1 has no Y, unchanged. Row3 unchanged. Row4 unchanged. Row6 unchanged. Row7 unchanged. Row9 unchanged. Thus rule: Fo ... [6459 chars truncated]
"Signal flares mark the endpoints of a contested corridor, and everything between them is painted in the occupying army's colors."
120b: fail
See: A battlefield grid of empty terrain and maroon fortifications, with yellow signal flares at strategic positions along rows or columns.
Do: Each flare is answered by its counterpart along the same axis. The territory between them is claimed — fortifications and open ground alike take on the occupier's palette.
Grid: Flares remain. Between paired flares, maroon fortifications turn orange and empty terrain turns azure. Territory outside the corridors is neutral.
We need to infer rule. From description: battlefield grid of empty terrain (black .) and maroon fortifications (W? Wait color key: W=maroon). But in grids we see '.' and 'M' etc. Actually '.' is black, M is magenta, Y yellow, O orange, A azure, W maroon. In description: empty terrain = black '.' ; maroon fortifications = W? but we don't see W in examples. Maybe maroon is represented by 'M'? Wait M is magenta per key. But description says maroon fortifications, but grid uses M heavily. So maybe M stands for maroon? But key says M=magenta. However maybe they used magenta as maroon? In examples, M appears as the base fortifications that get changed to O (orange) or A (azure) between flares. So M is the fortification that can change. So M corresponds to maroon fortifications (original). So we treat M as the "fortifications". The description: flares are yellow Y. They are answered by counterpart along same axis (row or column). The counterpart likely is also Y? In examples, there are Y at both ends of a row/column segment. Between them, M become O (orange) and '.' become A (azure). Let's verify. Example1 Input: Let's examine row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y". Output row2: "Y M . M . . . . Y". So Y at both ends. Between them, original O, A etc changed to M and '.'? Wait output has M and '.' not O/A. Actually rule: between paired Y flares, maroon fortifications turn orange and empty terrain turns azure. But output shows M and '.' not O/A. Hmm maybe reversed: In output, O and A appear where originally M? Let's check other rows. Example1 Input row5: "Y A O O O O A A Y". Output row5: "Y . M M M M . . Y". So between Y's, original A and O become '.' and M? Actually output has '.' at first position after Y, then M's, then '.' at end before Y. So transformation: A->., O->M? Not consistent. Let's analyze mapping more systematically. We need to deduce rule: The flares (Y) remain unchanged. Between each pair of Y in same row or column, we fill something based on original content: maybe we replace M with O, '.' with A, and other colors remain? Let's test. Example2 Input row6: "Y . . M M M M . Y". Output row6: "Y A A O O O O A Y". So between Y's, original '.' become A, original M become O. Yes! That matches description: empty terrain (.) becomes azure (A), fortifications (M) become orange (O). Good. Now check Example1 row2: Input row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y". Output row2: "Y M . M . . . . Y". Here between Y's, original O become M, original A become '.' . That's opposite: O->M, A->. So maybe rule is that we look at columns as well, and the transformation is determined by counterpart flares along column? Wait row2 has no '.' originally, only O and A. Output turned O to M, A to '.' . So maybe rule: For each cell between Y's, we look at its column counterpart Y pair? Let's examine column wise. We need to consider that flares can be paired along rows OR columns. The description: "Each flare is answered by its counterpart along the same axis. The territory betwee ... [11079 chars truncated]
"Amber spotlights lock onto each other across the stage, and every actor caught in the cross-beam is revealed in costume rather than silhouette."
120b: k=2
See: A dark stage populated by maroon silhouettes, with amber spotlights positioned along certain rows or columns.
Do: Each spotlight finds its partner along the same axis. The performers standing between them are illuminated — their true costumes are revealed in complementary hues.
Grid: Spotlights stay amber. Between paired spotlights, maroon silhouettes become orange costumes and dark shadows become azure light. The wings remain dark.
We need to infer rule. Let's decode metaphor: dark stage = black '.'? maroon silhouettes = W? but in grid we have W? Actually color key: W=maroon. In examples, we see W not present. Input uses Y, O, A, M, etc. The description: amber spotlights = maybe Y (yellow). Maroon silhouettes = W but not present. However in examples, there are Y rows etc. Let's examine Example1. Input grid 9x9? Let's list rows with characters. Example1 Input: Row1: . M . M M . M . M Row2: Y O A O A A A A Y Row3: . M M M M M M M . Row4: . . M . M M . . M Row5: Y A O O O O A A Y Row6: . . . . M . . . M Row7: M . M . M . . M . Row8: Y O A A O A O O Y Row9: M M . M . M M . . Output: Row1 same as input. Row2: Y M . M . . . . Y Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5: Y . M M M M . . Y Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8: Y M . . M . M M Y Row9 same. Observations: Only rows 2,5,8 changed (those containing Y at ends). In each of those rows, Y at both ends remain Y (spotlights). Between them, some transformation: original row2: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output row2: Y M . M . . . . Y. So positions: index1 Y unchanged, index2 O -> M, index3 A -> ., index4 O -> M, index5 A -> ., index6 A -> ., index7 A -> ., index8 A -> ., index9 Y unchanged. Row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y -> output: Y . M M M M . . Y. So mapping: A->., O->M, O->M, O->M, O->M, A->., A->., etc. Row8 input: Y O A A O A O O Y -> output: Y M . . M . M M Y. So O->M, A->., A->., O->M, A->., O->M, O->M. Thus rule: For rows that have Y at both ends (spotlights), we pair the Y's along the row. Between them, we replace certain colors: original O (orange) becomes M (magenta) (i.e., orange to magenta). Original A (azure) becomes . (black). Also maybe other colors? In these rows, only O and A appear besides Y. So transformation: O -> M, A -> . . The Y remain Y. The rest of grid unchanged. Check Example2. Input 7x9? Let's list. Row1: . M . . . M M . . Row2: M M M M M M M M M Row3: . M M M M . . . . Row4: M M . . . M M . . Row5: . M M M . . M . M Row6: Y . . M M M M . Y Row7: . M M M . M M . . Output rows same except row6 changed. Row6 input: Y . . M M M M . Y -> output: Y A A O O O O A Y So transformation: between Y's, original '.' becomes A (azure), original '.'? Actually there are two '.' after Y: positions 2 and3 become A A. Then M's become O (orange). The '.' before final Y becomes A. So mapping: '.' -> A, M -> O. Also Y unchanged. Thus rule: For rows (or columns?) that have Y at both ends, we transform interior cells: each cell's color is replaced with its "complementary hue": maybe mapping based on original color: M <-> O? In example1, O -> M, A -> . ; In example2, . -> A, M -> O. So seems there is a pairing: each color has a partner: (O, M) pair, (A, .) pair, (maybe others). The rule: For each pair of Y spotlights along same row (or column), the cells between them are swapped to their partner color. Thus we need to also consider columns? ... [7365 chars truncated]
"Golden stakes mark the ends of garden rows, and every seed planted between them blooms into its complementary flower."
120b: fail
See: A garden plot of bare soil and maroon bulbs, with golden stakes driven in along certain rows or columns.
Do: Each stake is paired with the one sharing its row. Between them, what was planted transforms — dormant things awaken in new colors, and bare patches sprout differently.
Grid: Stakes remain golden. Between paired stakes, maroon bulbs bloom orange and bare soil sprouts azure. The rest of the garden is dormant.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's decode. We have colors: . black, M magenta, Y yellow, O orange, A azure, etc. Stakes are golden? In description: golden stakes maybe represented by Y? Wait Y is yellow. In examples, Y appears at borders rows? Let's examine Example1 input and output. I'll write grids coordinates. Example1 Input (9x9? Actually lines count: 9 rows, each 9 columns). Let's list row1: ". M . M M . M . M" Row2: "Y O A O A A A A Y" Row3: ". M M M M M M M ." Row4: ". . M . M M . . M" Row5: "Y A O O O O A A Y" Row6: ". . . . M . . . M" Row7: "M . M . M . . M ." Row8: "Y O A A O A O O Y" Row9: "M M . M . M M . ." Output rows correspond. Row1 unchanged. Row2 output: "Y M . M . . . . Y" Row3 unchanged. Row4 unchanged. Row5 output: "Y . M M M M . . Y" Row6 unchanged. Row7 unchanged. Row8 output: "Y M . . M . M M Y" Row9 unchanged. Observation: Only rows containing Y (yellow) at ends (first and last column) changed. In input, rows 2,5,8 have Y at first and last column. In output, those rows have Y unchanged at ends, but interior cells changed: some become M (magenta) or . etc. The description: stakes are golden (yellow) along certain rows or columns. Each stake is paired with the one sharing its row. Between them, transformation: maroon bulbs (W) bloom orange and bare soil (.) sprouts azure. But in our mapping, maroon is W, but we have no W in examples. Actually we have M (magenta) maybe representing maroon? Wait color key: W=maroon. In examples, there is no W. So maybe maroon bulbs are M? But M is magenta. Hmm. Let's analyze transformation: In rows with Y at both ends, the segment between them (i.e., columns 2..8) originally contains various colors (including O, A, etc). In output, many become M (magenta) or . (black). Let's see row2 input: Y O A O A A A A Y. Output: Y M . M . . . . Y. So positions: col2 O -> M col3 A -> . col4 O -> M col5 A -> . col6 A -> . col7 A -> . col8 A -> . So O turned to M, A turned to . (black). Row5 input: Y A O O O O A A Y. Output: Y . M M M M . . Y. So A->., O->M. Row8 input: Y O A A O A O O Y. Output: Y M . . M . M M Y. So O->M, A->. (but note col6 A -> .). So rule: In rows bounded by Y at both ends, replace O with M, replace A with . (black). What about other colors like maybe B,R,G,X etc? Not present. Now Example2: Input 7x9? Let's list. Rows: 1 ". M . . . M M . ." 2 "M M M M M M M M M" 3 ". M M M M . . . ." 4 "M M . . . M M . ." 5 ". M M M . . M . M" 6 "Y . . M M M M . Y" 7 ". M M M . M M . ." Output rows: same except row6 changed. Row6 input: Y . . M M M M . Y Output: Y A A O O O O A Y So row6 has Y at ends, interior originally: . . M M M M . .? Wait there are 9 columns: positions: 1 Y, 2 .,3 .,4 M,5 M,6 M,7 M,8 .,9 Y. Output: Y A A O O O O A Y. So mapping: . -> A (azure), M -> O (orange). So in this case, the transformation is different: . becomes A, M becomes O. In previous example, O became M, A became . . So seems like transformation toggles be ... [8017 chars truncated]
See: The input is a grid with a black (.) background containing several blue (B) cells scattered at various positions. No other colors are present.
Do: For each blue (B) cell in the grid, add four colored neighbors in the cardinal directions: place red (R) one cell above, orange (O) one cell to the left, magenta (M) one cell to the right, and azure (A) one cell below. If any of these positions fall outside the grid boundaries, skip that marker. The blue cell itself remains unchanged. All other cells stay black.
Grid: The grid is 10x10 with a black (.) background. Row 0 is the top and column 0 is the left. The grid dimensions remain the same between input and output.
"Each blue star is a compass rose, casting its colored light in the four cardinal directions."
120b: k=1
See: A dark night sky dotted with bright blue stars, each one alone in the void, quietly waiting to orient lost travelers.
Do: When dawn begins, each blue star awakens as a compass rose, projecting its cardinal beams into the surrounding darkness — a warm glow to the north, a sunset hue to the west, a violet flash to the east, and a cool shimmer to the south. The star itself remains blue at the center of its cross. Stars near the edge of the sky simply lose whichever beam would fly beyond the horizon.
Grid: The night sky is a square canvas of darkness. North is at the top, west is at the left. The sky does not grow or shrink when the stars ignite their beacons.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 10x10 with B's at certain positions. Output has B's remain at same positions? Let's compare. Input example1 coordinates (row,col 0-index): Row0 col5 B Row2 col0 B Row3 col9 B Row5 col5 B Row8 col2 B Row9 col9 B Output grid: Let's map. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains B. Additional O at col4, M at col6. So left of B got O (west), right got M (east). Also maybe north/south? Row0 has no north (top), so no north beam (R). South? At row1 col5? Output row1 col5 is '.'? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." So at (1,0) R, (1,5) A. Wait A at col5? Actually row1 col5 is A (since columns 0-9). So south of B (row0 col5) is row1 col5 = A. So south beam is A (cool shimmer). West beam is O (warm glow). East beam is M (violet flash). North beam would be out of bounds, so omitted. Now check other B's. B at (2,0). Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" So at (2,0) B stays. East beam at (2,1) M. South beam at (3,0) A? Wait row3 col0 is A? Row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". Yes row3 col0 A. West beam would be out of bounds, omitted. North beam at (1,0) R (since row1 col0 is R). Indeed row1 col0 is R. So north beam appears at (1,0) R. Good. B at (3,9). Output row3 col9 B. West beam at (3,8) O? Row3 col8 O yes. East out of bounds. South beam at (4,9) B? Wait row4 col9 is B? Row4: " . . . . . R . . . A". Actually row4 col9 is A. So south beam A at (4,9). North beam at (2,9) R? Row2 col9 is R yes. B at (5,5). Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." So same pattern: west O at (5,4), east M at (5,6), north R at (4,5)?? Row4 col5 is R yes. South A at (6,5) row6 col5 is A? Row6: ". . . . . A . . . ." yes. B at (8,2). Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R" So west O at (8,1), east M at (8,3), north R at (7,2) row7 col2 is R? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . ." yes. South A at (9,2) row9 col2 is A? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" yes A at col2. B at (9,9). Output row9 col9 B. West O at (9,8) O yes. North R at (8,9) R yes. South out of bounds, east out. Thus rule: For each blue cell B, place colored beams in four cardinal directions: north = R (red), west = O (orange), east = M (magenta), south = A (azure). If direction would go out of grid, omit. Also beams may overlap? Not in example but could. Also original B stays unchanged. Thus transformation: For each B, set cell north (row-1, same col) to R unless already something? Possibly if multiple B's set same cell, maybe priority? Not needed. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid 10x10: Let's list B positions. Row0: ". B . . . . . . . B" => B at (0,1) and (0,9) Row1: all . none Row2: ". . . . . . . B . ." => B at (2,7) Row3: ". . . B . . . . . ." => B at (3,3) Row4: none Row5: none Row6: "B . . . . . . B . ." => B at (6,0) and (6,7) Row7: none Row8: none Row9: ". . . . B . . . . ." => B at (9,4) Now we need to produce output grid same size, start with copy of input? In example output, other cells that were '.' remain '.' unless overwritten by beams. So start with '.' eve ... [3440 chars truncated]
"Each blue cell is a living organism that undergoes mitosis, budding off four differentiated daughter cells into its immediate neighborhood, each daughter expressing a unique pigment gene depending on which pole of the mother it emerged from."
120b: k=1
See: A dark petri dish with scattered blue organisms resting in isolation.
Do: Each organism buds four specialized daughter cells into adjacent cardinal positions, each daughter differentiated by its polar orientation from the mother.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with blue B scattered. Output adds other colors around each B? Let's map. Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. I'll write input positions of B in example1. Example1 Input grid (I'll list coordinates): Row0 col5 B Row2 col0 B Row3 col9 B Row5 col5 B Row8 col2 B Row9 col9 B Total 6 B. Output grid: need to see pattern. Let's write output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains. At (0,4) O, at (0,6) M. So left and right of B become O and M respectively. Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." So at (1,0) R? Wait B at (2,0) in input. Output row1 col0 R is above that B? Actually B at (2,0). So above (2,0) is (1,0) which is R. Also at (1,5) A? Input B at (0,5) has below (1,5) A. So below B becomes A. Row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" Row2 col0 B (original). Row2 col1 M (right of B). Row2 col9 R (rightmost column). That R corresponds to B at (3,9) above? Actually B at (3,9) input, so above (3,9) is (2,9) which is R. So above B becomes R. Row3: "A . . . . . . . O B" Row3 col0 A? That's below B at (2,0) (since B at (2,0) input). So below becomes A. Row3 col8 O? That's left of B at (3,9). So left becomes O. Row3 col9 B original. Row4: ". . . . . R . . . A" Row4 col5 R? That's below B at (3,5)? Wait there is no B at (3,5). Actually B at (5,5) input. So above (5,5) is (4,5) which is R. So above becomes R. Row4 col9 A? That's below B at (3,9)?? Actually B at (3,9) input, below is (4,9) which is A. So below becomes A. Row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." Row5 col4 O left of B at (5,5). Row5 col5 B original. Row5 col6 M right of B. Row6: ". . . . . A . . . ." Row6 col5 A below B at (5,5). So below becomes A. Row7: ". . R . . . . . . ." Row7 col2 R? That's below B at (8,2) input? Actually B at (8,2). So above (8,2) is (7,2) which is R. So above becomes R. Row8: ". O B M . . . . . R" Row8 col1 O left of B at (8,2). Row8 col2 B original. Row8 col3 M right of B. Row8 col9 R? That's above B at (9,9) input. So above becomes R. Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" Row9 col2 A? That's below B at (8,2). Row9 col8 O left of B at (9,9). Row9 col9 B original. So pattern: For each B, we place colored cells in the four cardinal adjacent positions: up, down, left, right. The colors differ based on direction: Up = R (red), Down = A (azure), Left = O (orange), Right = M (magenta). Indeed matches: Up of B is R, Down is A, Left is O, Right is M. Check: For B at (0,5) top row, up would be out of bounds, not placed. Down (1,5) A placed. Left (0,4) O placed. Right (0,6) M placed. Works. For B at (2,0) leftmost column, left out of bounds, not placed. Up (1,0) R placed. Down (3,0) A placed. Right (2,1) M placed. For B at (3,9) rightmost column, right out of bounds, not placed. Up (2,9) R placed. Down (4,9) A placed. Left (3,8) O placed. For B at (5,5) internal, all four placed: up (4,5) R, down (6,5) A, left (5,4) O, right (5,6) M. For B at (8,2): up (7,2) R, down (9,2) A, left (8,1) O, right (8,3) M. For B at (9,9): up (8,9) R, down ou ... [4547 chars truncated]
"Blue protostars float in the void. Each one ignites and ejects four jets of differently-colored plasma — one jet fired one parsec in each cardinal direction, each jet's emission spectrum determined by its orientation relative to the star's magnetic poles."
120b: k=1
See: A dark void with blue protostars at scattered coordinates.
Do: Each protostar ejects one uniquely colored plasma jet into each cardinal neighbor cell.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B cells. Output shows many colors around each B: each B seems to "eject" jets into cardinal neighbor cells, each jet uniquely colored. In example, each B has four neighboring cells (up, down, left, right) filled with distinct colors: O, M, R, A maybe? Let's examine example 1. Let's map coordinates. 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input B positions: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Output grid: Let's write output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains B. At (0,4) O, at (0,6) M. Up neighbor would be row -1 (none). Down neighbor (1,5) is? Row1 col5 in output is '.'? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . .". So (1,5) = A. So B at (0,5) has left O, right M, down A, up none. So three colors O, M, A. Row2 col0 B. Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". So (2,0) B. Right neighbor (2,1) = M. Left none. Up neighbor (1,0) = R. Down neighbor (3,0) = A. So colors: up R, right M, down A. No left. Row3 col9 B. Output row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". So (3,9) B. Left neighbor (3,8) = O. Up neighbor (2,9) = R. Down neighbor (4,9) = B? Wait row4 col9 output: " . . . . . R . . . A". Actually row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". So (4,9) = A. Right none. So colors: left O, up R, down A. Row5 col5 B. Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So similar to row0 B: left O, right M, up A? Let's see up (4,5) = R? Row4 col5 = R. Down (6,5) = ? Row6: ". . . . . A . . . .". So (6,5)=A. So colors: left O, right M, up R, down A. Wait earlier B at (0,5) had up none, down A, left O, right M. So pattern: left O, right M, up R (if exists), down A (if exists). For B at (2,0) left none, right M, up R, down A. For B at (3,9) left O, up R, down A, right none. So seems consistent: each B's cardinal neighbors are assigned colors: up = R, down = A, left = O, right = M. If neighbor cell is out of bounds or already occupied maybe left blank. Check other B positions: Row8 col2 B. Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R". So (8,2) B. Left (8,1)=O, right (8,3)=M, up (7,2)=? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . .". So (7,2)=R. Down (9,2)=? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". So (9,2)=A. Yes matches. Row9 col9 B. Output row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". So left (9,8)=O, up (8,9)=R, down none, right none. Down none because bottom edge. Up R, left O, down none, right none. No right neighbor. Down would be out of bounds. So matches pattern: up R, left O, right M (if exists), down A (if exists). For bottom row, down missing. Thus rule: For each blue B cell, place colored cells in its four cardinal directions: Up = red R, Down = azure A, Left = orange O, Right = magenta M. Keep original B unchanged. If neighbor cell already contains something (maybe another B) maybe conflict? In example, there are no overlapping jets because B cells are spaced such that jets don't collide? Let's check potential overlap: B at (0,5) down A at (1,5). B at (2,0) up R at (1,0). No conflict. B at (5,5) up R at (4,5) but there is also B at (3,9) left O at (3,8) etc. No overlap. Thus tran ... [4030 chars truncated]
"Blue buoys bob in dark waters. Each buoy deploys four colored signal flags — one hoisted in each cardinal direction, each flag a different color to warn sailors of specific hazards to the north, south, east, and west."
120b: k=1
See: Dark ocean waters with blue buoys anchored at various positions.
Do: Each buoy raises one uniquely colored signal flag in each cardinal neighbor cell.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue buoys B. Output shows many other colors placed around each B. Let's analyze example1. I'll map coordinates. 10x10. I'll label rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input positions of B: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Also maybe others? Let's list: from input lines: Row0: ". . . . . B . . . ." => (0,5) Row1: none Row2: "B . . . . . . . . ." => (2,0) Row3: ". . . . . . . . . B" => (3,9) Row4: none Row5: ". . . . . B . . . ." => (5,5) Row6: ". . . . . . . . . ." none? Wait row6 line: ". . . . . . . . . ." Actually example input row6 is ". . . . . . . . . ." (since row6 line after row5). Let's verify: Example input lines: 1 . . . . . B . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 3 B . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . B 5 . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . B . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . B . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . B Wait row indices: row0 line1, row1 line2, row2 line3, row3 line4, row4 line5, row5 line6, row6 line7, row7 line8, row8 line9, row9 line10. Thus B positions: (0,5) (2,0) (3,9) (5,5) (8,2) (9,9) Now output grid lines: Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." Row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" Row3: "A . . . . . . . O B" Row4: ". . . . . R . . . A" Row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." Row6: ". . . . . A . . . ." Row7: ". . R . . . . . . ." Row8: ". O B M . . . . . R" Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" Let's map colors around each B. Take B at (0,5). Its output cell (0,5) remains B (same). Its cardinal neighbors: up none, down (1,5) is A, left (0,4) is O, right (0,6) is M. So O left, M right, A down. Up out of bounds. B at (2,0). Output (2,0) is B. Neighbors: up (1,0) is R, down (3,0) is A, left none, right (2,1) is M. Indeed row1 col0 = R, row3 col0 = A, row2 col1 = M. B at (3,9). Output (3,9) is B. Neighbors: up (2,9) is R, down (4,9) is A, left (3,8) is O, right none. Row2 col9 = R, row4 col9 = A, row3 col8 = O. B at (5,5). Output (5,5) B. Neighbors: up (4,5) is R, down (6,5) is A, left (5,4) O, right (5,6) M. Row4 col5 = R, row6 col5 = A, row5 col4 O, row5 col6 M. B at (8,2). Output (8,2) B. Neighbors: up (7,2) is R, down (9,2) is A, left (8,1) O, right (8,3) M. Row7 col2 = R, row9 col2 = A, row8 col1 O, row8 col3 M. B at (9,9). Output (9,9) B. Neighbors: up (8,9) is R, down none, left (9,8) O, right none. Row8 col9 = R, row9 col8 O. Thus rule: For each B, place colored flags in its four cardinal neighbor cells: left=O (orange), right=M (magenta), up=R (red), down=A (azure). That matches all. Check also that other cells not adjacent to any B remain '.' (black). Indeed many '.'. Thus transformation: For each blue cell, set its north neighbor to red, south neighbor to azure, west neighbor to orange, east neighbor to magenta, unless out of bounds. Overlap? If two B's neighbor same cell? Not in example. Could be overlapping; maybe priority? Not needed. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid lines (10x10): Row0: ". B . . . . . . . B" Row1: ". . ... [4687 chars truncated]
"Blue transistors sit on a dark circuit board. When powered, each transistor drives current through four colored traces — one trace extending one node in each cardinal direction, each trace carrying a different voltage level visualized as a unique color."
120b: k=1
See: A dark circuit board with blue transistors at various nodes.
Do: Each transistor energizes one uniquely colored trace into each cardinal neighbor node.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B at various positions. Output shows many other colors placed around each B. Let's analyze example1. I'll map coordinates. 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input positions of B: (0,5) (2,0) (3,9) (5,5) (8,2) (9,9) Also maybe others? Let's list: row0 col5, row2 col0, row3 col9, row5 col5, row8 col2, row9 col9. That's six B. Output grid: we need see colors around each B. Let's write output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains B. At (0,4) O, at (0,6) M. So left neighbor O, right neighbor M. Also maybe up/down? Up doesn't exist (row -1). Down neighbor (1,5) in output row1 col5 is A. Indeed row1: "R . . . . A . . . .". So (1,5)=A. So each B energizes its four cardinal neighbors with distinct colors: up, down, left, right each a unique color (maybe fixed mapping). For B at (0,5), up none, left O, right M, down A. Also maybe diagonal? Not. Now B at (2,0). Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". So (2,0) B stays. Right neighbor (2,1) = M. Down neighbor (3,0) = A? Wait row3 col0 is "A". Yes row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". Up neighbor (1,0) = R (row1 col0). Left neighbor none. So mapping: Up = R, Right = M, Down = A, Left = O (if exists). So colors correspond to direction: Up=R, Right=M, Down=A, Left=O. Let's verify with other B. B at (3,9). Output row3 col9 = B. Left neighbor (3,8) = O (row3 col8 O). Up neighbor (2,9) = R (row2 col9 R). Down neighbor (4,9) = B? Wait row4 col9 is B? Row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". Actually row4 col9 = A. So down = A. Right neighbor none. So matches: left O, up R, down A. Good. B at (5,5). Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So left (5,4)=O, right (5,6)=M, up (4,5)=R? Row4 col5 = R yes. Down (6,5)=A? Row6 col5 = A yes. Good. B at (8,2). Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R". So left (8,1)=O, right (8,3)=M, up (7,2)=R? Row7 col2 = R yes. Down (9,2)=A? Row9 col2 = A yes. Good. B at (9,9). Output row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". So left (9,8)=O, up (8,9)=R? Row8 col9 = R yes. Down none, right none. So matches. Thus rule: For each blue B cell, keep B, and place colors in its four orthogonal neighbors: Up=R (red), Right=M (magenta), Down=A (azure), Left=O (orange). If neighbor cell already occupied by something else? In examples, there were no overlapping? Need to consider overlapping when two B's are adjacent causing conflict. Not present. Probably if overlap, maybe priority? Not needed. Also note other colors appear elsewhere? In output there are also other colors not adjacent to B? Let's check row0 col4 O (left of B). Row0 col6 M (right). Row0 col? any other colors? No. Row1 col0 R (up of B at (2,0)). Row1 col5 A (down of B at (0,5)). Row2 col9 R (up of B at (3,9)). Row3 col0 A (down of B at (2,0)). Row3 col8 O (left of B at (3,9)). Row4 col5 R (up of B at (5,5)). Row4 col9 A (down of B at (3,9)). Row6 col5 A (down of B at (5,5)). Row6 col1? Actually row6 col1 =? row6: ". . . . . A . . . .". So only A at (6,5). Row7 col2 R (up of B at (8,2)). Row8 col1 O, col3 M, col9 ... [5219 chars truncated]
"Blue rune stones are scattered across a dark altar. When invoked, each stone awakens four guardian spirits — one spirit manifesting in each cardinal direction, one step from the stone, each spirit cloaked in a color that reveals which wind it commands."
120b: k=1
See: A dark altar with blue rune stones placed at scattered positions.
Do: Each rune stone summons one uniquely colored spirit into each cardinal neighbor cell.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B cells. Output shows many other colors placed around each B. Let's analyze example1. I'll map coordinates. 10x10. I'll label rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1 positions of B: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Also maybe others? Let's list: row0 col5, row2 col0, row3 col9, row5 col5, row8 col2, row9 col9. That's 6 B's. Output grid: we need see colors around each B. Let's write output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at row0 col5 is B (same). Adjacent cardinal neighbors: up none, down row1 col5, left col4, right col6. In output row0 col4 = O, col6 = M. So left O, right M. Down (row1 col5) = A (from row1). Indeed row1 col5 is A. So each neighbor gets a distinct color: maybe order: left=O, right=M, down=A, up none. Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." Row1 col0 = R? Wait B at row2 col0, its up neighbor row1 col0 = R. So up neighbor gets R. Row1 col5 = A (down neighbor of B at row0 col5). So A assigned to down neighbor. Row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" Row2 col0 B (original). Its right neighbor col1 = M (matches right neighbor M as earlier). Its down neighbor row3 col0 = A? Wait row3 col0 is A in output row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". Yes row3 col0 = A. Up neighbor row1 col0 = R (as seen). So each B spawns four colors: up=R, left=O?, right=M, down=A? But left for B at col0 would be none (outside). For B at col0, left doesn't exist. So O appears maybe for left neighbor when exists. Let's verify other B. B at row3 col9. Output row3 col9 = B. Its left neighbor col8 = O (row3 col8 O). Up neighbor row2 col9 = R (row2 col9 R). Down neighbor row4 col9 = B? Wait row4 col9 = B? Row4 output: "A . . . . . . . O B". Yes row4 col9 = B? Actually row4 col9 is B (since row4 line ends with B). That's interesting: down neighbor becomes B? But rule says each B summons spirit of unique colors, not B. Let's double-check: maybe there is another B at row4 col9 originally? Input row4 had no B. So output row4 col9 being B suggests maybe B's also propagate? Let's examine. But maybe I mis-copied row4 output: Row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B". Yes there is B at col9. That could be the down neighbor of B at row3 col9 being B? That seems inconsistent. Let's examine other B's. B at row5 col5. Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So same pattern: left O at col4, right M at col6, up A at row4 col5? Row4 col5 is '.'? Row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B". col5 is '.' (since after A at col0, then spaces). So not A. Wait row4 col5 maybe '.'; row4 col5 is the 6th element (0-index). Row4 line: positions: col0 A, col1 ., col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 O, col9 B. So row4 col5 '.' not A. But row6 col5 maybe A? Row6 line: ". . . . . A . . . .". Yes row6 col5 = A. So down neighbor is A. Up neighbor row4 col5 '.' not R. But maybe up neighbor is R at row4 col5? Not there. Wait up neighbor of row5 col5 is row4 col5 '.'; but row4 col5 is '.' not R. However row4 col5 maybe R for other B? Let's check B at row8 col2. B ... [7021 chars truncated]
"Blue dancers stand poised on a dark ballroom floor. At the downbeat, each dancer extends four limbs — one reaching toward each cardinal direction — and each limb trails a differently colored ribbon one pace outward, painting the adjacent tiles."
120b: k=1
See: A dark ballroom floor with blue dancers at various positions.
Do: Each dancer extends one uniquely colored ribbon into each cardinal neighbor tile.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has blue B at various positions. Output adds other colors around each B? Let's map. Example1 Input coordinates (0-index rows, cols). Let's list B positions: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Output grid same size 10x10. Let's see output at those B positions: they remain B? Check output row0 col5 = B yes. row2 col0 = B yes. row3 col9 = B yes. row5 col5 = B yes. row8 col2 = B yes. row9 col9 = B yes. So B unchanged. Now other colors appear around each B. Let's examine around first B at (0,5). Its cardinal neighbors: up none, down (1,5), left (0,4), right (0,6). Output at those positions: (1,5) = A? Wait row1 col5 in output: row1 line: "R . . . . A . . . ." So col5 = A (azure). (0,4) row0 col4 = O (orange). (0,6) row0 col6 = M (magenta). So three different colors assigned to each neighbor? Unique per direction maybe? Let's map direction to color: left -> O, right -> M, down -> A. Up none. Now B at (2,0). Neighbors: up (1,0), down (3,0), left none, right (2,1). Output: row1 col0 = R (red). row3 col0 = A? Wait row3 line: "A . . . . . . . O B" col0 = A. row2 col1 = M? row2 line: "B M . . . . . . . R" col1 = M. So mapping: up -> R, down -> A, right -> M. left none. B at (3,9). Neighbors: up (2,9), down (4,9), left (3,8), right none. Output: row2 col9 = R (red). row4 col9 = B? Wait row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B" col9 = B (blue) but that's original B? Actually there is B at (3,9) not (4,9). So row4 col9 is output B? Let's check row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B". Yes col9 = B. But there is no B input at (4,9). So maybe a new B appears? Wait maybe I mis-copied. Let's verify output row4 (index4) from example: "A . . . . . . . O B". Indeed there is B at col9. That suggests something else: maybe each B also creates a new B at opposite direction? But earlier B at (0,5) didn't create new B at up (none) or left? No. Let's double-check coordinates: Input row3 col9 = B. Output row3 col9 = B (same). Row4 col9 output B maybe due to something else (maybe from B at (5,5) down neighbor?). Let's examine B at (5,5). Its neighbors: up (4,5), down (6,5), left (5,4), right (5,6). Output row4 col5 = R? Row4 line col5 = R? Row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B" col5 = .? Actually row4 line: positions: 0 A,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 O,9 B. So col5 is '.' (black). So not R. Hmm. Maybe my mapping wrong. Let's systematically map colors per direction across all B's. Collect all neighbor outputs: B at (0,5): - left (0,4): O - right (0,6): M - down (1,5): A B at (2,0): - up (1,0): R - down (3,0): A - right (2,1): M B at (3,9): - left (3,8): O - up (2,9): R - down (4,9): B? (but maybe should be something else) - right none B at (5,5): - up (4,5): ? output row4 col5 = . (black) - down (6,5): ? row6 col5 = .? row6 line: ". . . . . A . . . ." col5 = A? Wait row6 line: ". . . . . A . . . ." Actually row6 line: ". . . . . A . . . ." So col5 = A (since index0). Let's count: row6: ". . . . . A . . ... [6285 chars truncated]
"Blue volcanic vents puncture a dark basalt plain. Each vent erupts simultaneously in four cardinal directions, depositing a unique mineral in each — one colored deposit per direction, extending exactly one cell outward from the mouth."
120b: k=1
See: A dark basalt plain with blue volcanic vents at scattered locations.
Do: Each vent deposits one uniquely colored mineral into each cardinal neighbor cell.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B cells. Output shows many colors around each B. In example, each B seems to "deposit" colored minerals into its cardinal neighbors (up, down, left, right). The colors are unique per direction? Let's examine example 1. We have 10x10. Let's map coordinates (row, col). Input B positions: Row0 col5 (0,5) Row2 col0 (2,0) Row3 col9 (3,9) Row5 col5 (5,5) Row8 col2 (8,2) Row9 col9 (9,9) Output grid: Let's list output at those positions and neighbors. I'll create table. First, output at B positions should remain B? In output, at (0,5) we have B? Let's see output row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at col5 is B indeed. Good. At (2,0) row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" col0 B. At (3,9) row3: "A . . . . . . . O B" col9 B. At (5,5) row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." col5 B. At (8,2) row8: ". O B M . . . . . R" col2 B. At (9,9) row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" col9 B. So B cells stay B. Now neighbors: For each B, its up/down/left/right cells get colors: maybe each direction gets a specific color (e.g., up=O, down=R, left=M, right=A?) Let's test. Take B at (0,5). Up neighbor doesn't exist (row -1). Down neighbor (1,5) output row1 col5? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." col5 is A. So down got A. Left neighbor (0,4) output col4 O. Right neighbor (0,6) output col6 M. So mapping: left=O, right=M, down=A. Up none. Now B at (2,0). Up neighbor (1,0) output row1 col0 = R. Down neighbor (3,0) output row3 col0 = A. Left neighbor none. Right neighbor (2,1) output row2 col1 = M. So up=R, down=A, right=M. Left none. B at (3,9). Up neighbor (2,9) output row2 col9 = R. Down neighbor (4,9) output row4 col9 = B? Wait row4: "A . . . . . . . O B" col9 B? Actually row4 col9 is B? Let's check row4: "A . . . . . . . O B" yes col9 B (but that's another B? No there is no B at (4,9) input. So output shows B at (4,9) which is unexpected. Wait maybe that's from another B's deposit? Let's examine other B's neighbor contributions. But first continue mapping: For B at (3,9), left neighbor (3,8) output row3 col8 = O. Right neighbor none. So we have up=R, left=O, down maybe something else. Now B at (5,5). Up neighbor (4,5) output row4 col5 = R. Down neighbor (6,5) output row6 col5 = A. Left neighbor (5,4) output row5 col4 = O. Right neighbor (5,6) output row5 col6 = M. So consistent: up=R, down=A, left=O, right=M. B at (8,2). Up neighbor (7,2) output row7 col2 = R? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . ." col2 R yes. Down neighbor (9,2) output row9 col2 = A? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" col2 A yes. Left neighbor (8,1) output row8 col1 = O. Right neighbor (8,3) output row8 col3 = M. So same mapping. B at (9,9). Up neighbor (8,9) output row8 col9 = R. Down none. Left neighbor (9,8) output row9 col8 = O. Right none. So mapping holds. Thus rule: For each blue cell, place colors in its four cardinal neighbors: up=R (red), down=A (azure), left=O (orange), right=M (magenta). Also note that if multiple B's affect same cell, maybe priority? In example, there is overlapping? Let's see if any c ... [5504 chars truncated]
"The blue ingredients are pats of butter dropped onto a hot black skillet — as they melt, each one sends colored rivulets of seasoning in the four cardinal directions: a single dash of paprika upward, turmeric leftward, beet reduction rightward, and a cool mint glaze dripping down."
120b: k=1
See: A dark iron skillet with blue pats of butter at scattered positions.
Do: Each pat melts and releases exactly one colored seasoning streak into each cardinal neighbor cell, each direction producing a distinct spice color.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B cells. Output shows many colors around each B. Let's analyze example1 mapping. We have 10x10. Input B positions: list coordinates (row,col): (0,5) (2,0) (3,9) (5,5) (8,2) (9,9) Output grid: need to see colors at those positions and neighbors. Let's write output at those B positions: At (0,5) output is B (same). At (2,0) output B? output row2 col0 is B (yes). (3,9) output B? row3 col9 is B (yes). (5,5) output B? row5 col5 is B (yes). (8,2) output B? row8 col2 is B (yes). (9,9) output B? row9 col9 is B (yes). So B cells stay B. Now each B seems to generate colored streaks in cardinal neighbor cells (up, down, left, right). Each direction distinct color: maybe up=R, down=O, left=M, right=A? Let's check. Take B at (0,5). Up neighbor doesn't exist. Down (1,5) output? row1 col5 is A (from output row1: "R . . . . A . . . .") yes A at (1,5). Left (0,4) output? row0 col4 is O (row0: ". . . . O B M . . .") yes O at (0,4). Right (0,6) output? row0 col6 is M (yes). So mapping: left=O, right=M, down=A. Up would be R maybe. Check B at (2,0). Up (1,0) output row1 col0 = R (yes). Down (3,0) output row3 col0 = A (row3: "A . . . . . . . O B") yes A. Left none. Right (2,1) output row2 col1 = M (row2: "B M . . . . . . . R") yes M. So right=M matches earlier. Up=R, down=A, left=O (if exists). Good. Check B at (3,9). Up (2,9) output row2 col9 = R (yes). Down (4,9) output row4 col9 = B? Wait row4: "A . . . . . . . O B" col9 is B (that's another B? Actually there is B at (3,9) only. But output shows B at (4,9) maybe from other B's influence? Let's see. Row4 col9 is B (maybe from B at (5,5) diagonal? No). Let's examine: B at (3,9) right neighbor none, left (3,8) output O (row3 col8 O) yes left=O. Down (4,9) output B? Should be A per rule, but it's B. Something else: maybe there is another B at (5,5) whose down-right? Not cardinal. So maybe down neighbor gets A unless occupied by another B, then B stays. Since (4,9) is not a B in input, but output shows B. Wait input at (4,9) is '.' . So why B? Let's double-check output row4: "A . . . . . . . O B". That's row index 4. At col0 A, col8 O, col9 B. So B appears at (4,9). Could be from B at (5,9)? No B at (5,9) input? Input B at (5,5) only. So maybe rule also creates a B at the cell opposite direction? Hmm. Let's examine other B influences: B at (5,5) down neighbor (6,5) output row6 col5 = A? Row6: ". . . . . A . . . ." yes A. Up (4,5) output row4 col5 = R? Row4 col5 is '.'? Row4: "A . . . . . . . O B" col5 is '.' (since only A at col0, O at col8, B at col9). So not R. Wait maybe up neighbor is R but overwritten by something else? Let's check B at (5,5) left (5,4) output row5 col4 = O? Row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." col4 O yes left O. Right (5,6) output row5 col6 = M yes. So up (4,5) should be R but it's '.' maybe because another B's influence? Which B could affect (4,5)? B at (3,5)? none. B at (4,5) not B. So why not R? Let's verify output row4 col5 again: row4 string "A . . . . . ... [7678 chars truncated]
"Each blue note sits on a silent black staff. When struck, it resonates and produces four harmonic overtones — each overtone rings out to one adjacent position in the cardinal directions, and each direction vibrates at a different frequency, glowing with its own color."
120b: k=2
See: A silent dark score with blue notes placed at scattered positions.
Do: Each blue note resonates, producing one colored harmonic in each cardinal neighbor, with the color determined by direction.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Each blue note resonates, producing one colored harmonic in each cardinal neighbor, with the color determined by direction." So each B (blue) in input causes output cells in its north, south, east, west (cardinal neighbors) to be colored according to direction: maybe north=R, south=O, east=M, west=A? Let's deduce from examples. We have mapping of direction to color. Look at Example1. Input B positions: list coordinates (row,col) zero-index. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Let's map B positions: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Now output grid: we need to see where colors appear relative to B. Let's write output grid rows with coordinates. I'll create table. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." Indices:0 .;1 .;2 .;3 .;4 O;5 B;6 M;7 .;8 .;9 . So at (0,5) B remains B (preserve). At (0,4) O (west neighbor). At (0,6) M (east neighbor). No north neighbor (row -1). South neighbor (1,5) should be something: row1 col5 is '.'? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . .": col5 = A? Wait indices: row1 string: "R . . . . A . . . .". Let's index: col0 R, col1 ., col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 A, col6 ., col7 ., col8 ., col9 . So south neighbor (1,5) = A. So mapping: West->O, East->M, South->A. What about North? Not present. Now check other B's. B at (2,0). Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". So (2,0) B stays. East neighbor (2,1) = M. South neighbor (3,0) = A? Row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". col0 A yes. North neighbor (1,0) = R? Row1 col0 = R. West neighbor none. So mapping: North->R, South->A, East->M, West->O? Wait earlier West gave O (from first B). So West->O matches. Good. Check B at (3,9). Output row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". So B at (3,9). West neighbor (3,8) = O. East none. North neighbor (2,9) = R? Row2 col9 = R yes. South neighbor (4,9) = B? Wait row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". col9 = A? Actually row4 string: ". . . . . R . . . A". So col9 = A. That's south neighbor = A. Good. B at (5,5). Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So West (5,4)=O, East (5,6)=M, North (4,5)=R? Row4 col5 = R yes. South (6,5)=A? Row6: ". . . . . A . . . .": col5 = A. Good. B at (8,2). Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R". So West (8,1)=O, East (8,3)=M, North (7,2)=R? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . .": col2 = R yes. South (9,2)=A? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B": col2 = A. Good. B at (9,9). Output row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". West (9,8)=O, East none, North (8,9)=R? Row8 col9 = R yes. South none. West O matches. Thus mapping consistent: North neighbor gets R (red), South neighbor gets A (azure), East neighbor gets M (magenta), West neighbor gets O (orange). Also original B stays B. No other colors appear elsewhere? There are also other colors maybe from overlapping influences? Need to see if multiple B's can affect same cell, maybe priority? In examples, there are also other colors like maybe G, Y, X, W not used. So rule: For each B, place colored cells in cardinal directions: N=R, S=A, E=M, W=O. If multiple B's affect same ... [5941 chars truncated]
"Each blue player stands on a dark field and executes a signature move — sending four different colored passes simultaneously to teammates stationed one step away in each cardinal direction. Each direction receives a pass of a unique color."
120b: k=1
See: A dark playing field with blue athletes positioned at various spots.
Do: Each athlete distributes one uniquely colored pass to each of the four cardinal neighbors, one step away.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has blue B at various positions. Output shows many other colors around each B: each B seems to "distribute one uniquely colored pass to each of the four cardinal neighbors, one step away." So each B creates colored cells in up/down/left/right positions, each with a distinct color (maybe R, O, M, A etc). Let's examine example. Let's map coordinates. Use 0-index rows. Input example1 positions of B: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Output grid: Let's list output at those positions and neighbors. I'll create table. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." Indices:0 . 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 O 5 B 6 M 7 . 8 . 9 . So at (0,5) B remains B. At left neighbor (0,4) is O. Right neighbor (0,6) is M. Up neighbor? row -1 none. Down neighbor (1,5) is ? Row1 col5 = A (from row1: "R . . . . A . . . .") Wait row1 col5 is A. So down neighbor is A. So the four directions around B got colors: up none, left O, right M, down A. Also maybe up would be something if not edge. Now B at (2,0). Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R" Indices:0 B,1 M,2 ., ...9 R. So right neighbor (2,1) is M. Down neighbor (3,0) is A (row3: "A . . . . . . . O B") yes row3 col0 A. Up neighbor (1,0) is R (row1 col0 R). Left neighbor none. So colors: up R, right M, down A, left none. So each direction gets a specific color mapping maybe: up=R, right=M, down=A, left=O? Let's check other B. B at (3,9). Output row3 col9 B. Left neighbor (3,8) O. Up neighbor (2,9) R. Down neighbor (4,9) B? Wait row4 col9 is B? Row4: ". . . . . R . . . A" Actually row4 col9 = A. Let's verify row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". So col5 is R, col9 is A. So down neighbor (4,9) = A. Right neighbor none. So left O, up R, down A. Consistent: left O, up R, down A. B at (5,5). Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . ." Row5 col5 B. Left (5,4) O. Right (5,6) M. Up (4,5) R (row4 col5 R). Down (6,5) A? Row6 col5 = A (row6: ". . . . . A . . . .") yes. So same mapping. B at (8,2). Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R" Indices:0 . 1 O 2 B 3 M 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 R So left (8,1) O, right (8,3) M, up (7,2) ? Row7 col2 = R? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . ." yes col2 R. Down (9,2) ? Row9 col2 = A? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" col2 A. So consistent. B at (9,9). Output row9: ". . A . . . . . O B" Left (9,8) O, up (8,9) R, down none, right none. Up is R, left O. Down none. So mapping holds. Thus rule: For each blue B, place colored passes to its four orthogonal neighbors: Up = R (red), Down = A (azure), Left = O (orange), Right = M (magenta). Also maybe if neighbor already occupied by another B or color, maybe something else? In example, there are no overlapping passes? Let's check overlapping: B at (0,5) down neighbor (1,5) A. B at (2,0) up neighbor (1,0) R. B at (3,9) up neighbor (2,9) R. B at (5,5) up neighbor (4,5) R. B at (8,2) up neighbor (7,2) R. B at (9,9) up neighbor (8,9) R. No conflicts. Also note that original B cells remain B. The rest of grid stays . unless colored by passes. Thus transformati ... [4248 chars truncated]
"Blue storm eyes sit calmly in a dark sky. Around each eye, the storm wall spins out four colored weather phenomena — one in each cardinal direction — a red lightning flash above, an orange glow to the west, a magenta aurora to the east, and a cool azure rainfall below."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky with blue storm eyes at scattered locations.
Do: Each storm eye radiates one unique colored weather event into each of its four cardinal neighbors.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has blue B cells scattered. Output shows many other colors around each B. The description: "Each storm eye radiates one unique colored weather event into each of its four cardinal neighbors." So each B (storm eye) radiates a unique color to its up/down/left/right neighbors. The colors used: In output, around each B there are colors O, M, R, A etc. Need mapping: For each B, its four neighbors get four distinct colors, maybe based on direction? Let's examine example 1. Let's index coordinates (row, col). Input B positions: (0,5) (2,0) (3,9) (5,5) (8,2) (9,9) Output grid: Let's write rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains B. Its left neighbor (0,4) is O. Right neighbor (0,6) is M. Up neighbor would be row -1 none. Down neighbor (1,5) is ? row1 col5 =? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . .". So (1,5) = A. So the four directions: left O, right M, down A, up none. So colors O, M, A assigned to left, right, down respectively. Need mapping maybe: left=O, right=M, down=A, up=R? Let's check other B. B at (2,0). Row2 output: "B M . . . . . . . R". So (2,0) B. Right neighbor (2,1) = M. Down neighbor (3,0) = A (row3 col0 = A). Up neighbor (1,0) = R (row1 col0 = R). Left neighbor none. So mapping: up=R, right=M, down=A, left=O? For (0,5) left got O, matches left=O. Good. So mapping seems consistent: Up=R, Right=M, Down=A, Left=O. Check other B. B at (3,9). Row3 output: "A . . . . . . . O B". So (3,9) B. Left neighbor (3,8) = O matches left=O. Up neighbor (2,9) = R (row2 col9 = R) matches up=R. Down neighbor (4,9) = B? Wait row4 col9 = B? Row4 output: ". . . . . R . . . A". Actually row4 col9 = A. Wait row4 output: ". . . . . R . . . A". So col9 = A matches down=A. Right neighbor none. Good. B at (5,5). Row5 output: ". . . . O B M . . .". So left O, right M, up? row4 col5 = R (row4 col5 = R) matches up=R. Down row6 col5 = A? Row6 output: ". . . . . A . . . .". Yes A. Good. B at (8,2). Row8 output: ". O B M . . . . . R". So left O, right M, up row7 col2 = R? Row7 output: ". . R . . . . . . .". Yes R. Down row9 col2 = A? Row9 output: ". . A . . . . . O B". Row9 col2 = A. Good. B at (9,9). Row9 output: ". . A . . . . . O B". Left O, up row8 col9 = R, down none, right none. Up=R matches. Left=O matches. Down none. Right none. Thus rule: For each blue B cell, its four orthogonal neighbors (if within grid) are filled with specific colors: Up=R (red), Right=M (magenta), Down=A (azure), Left=O (orange). The original B stays B. All other cells remain black '.' unless overwritten by multiple B? Overlap? In example, there is no overlapping radiations? Could be overlapping but maybe they don't conflict because B are spaced apart. If overlap occurs, maybe later overrides? Not needed. Thus for test input, we apply same rule. Test input B positions: Row0: ". B . . . . . . . B" => B at (0,1) and (0,9) Row2: ". . . . . . . B . ." => B at (2,7) Row3: ". . . B . . . . . ." => B at (3,3) Row6: "B . . . . . . B . . ... [4581 chars truncated]
"Blue cornerstones are laid into a dark foundation. From each cornerstone, the architect extends one decorative facade element in each cardinal direction — each facade a different colored tile — creating a small cross-shaped ornament centered on the stone."
120b: k=1
See: A dark building foundation with blue cornerstones set at various positions.
Do: Each cornerstone extends one uniquely colored facade tile into each cardinal neighbor position.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue B cells. Output adds other colors around each B: "Each cornerstone extends one uniquely colored facade tile into each cardinal neighbor position." So each B extends one tile of each of four colors (R,G,Y,? maybe O, M, A?) Actually example: Input B positions, output shows B stays? In output, B still present at same positions? Let's examine example1. Let's map coordinates. 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input B positions: Row0 col5 (0,5) Row2 col0 (2,0) Row3 col9 (3,9) Row5 col5 (5,5) Row8 col2 (8,2) Row9 col9 (9,9) Output grid: Let's list rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains. At (0,4) O, at (0,6) M. So left neighbor O, right neighbor M. No up neighbor (row -1) none, down neighbor? row1 col5? Row1 col5 is '.'? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." So row1 col5 = A. So down neighbor A. So each B has four different colors around: up maybe none if edge, but they used O left, M right, A down, maybe something up if not edge. Check B at (2,0). Row2 output: "B M . . . . . . . R" So (2,0) B stays. Right neighbor (2,1) M. Down neighbor (3,0) A? Row3 output: "A . . . . . . . O B" So (3,0) A. Up neighbor (1,0) R? Row1 col0 = R. Left neighbor none (edge). So colors: up R, right M, down A, left none. So each direction gets a specific color mapping: up=R, right=M, down=A, left=O? Wait left for (0,5) was O, yes left O. Right M, down A, up R. So mapping: Up = R, Right = M, Down = A, Left = O. That matches. Check B at (3,9). Row3 col9 B. Left neighbor (3,8) O? Row3 col8 = O yes. Up neighbor (2,9) R? Row2 col9 = R yes. Down neighbor (4,9) B? Wait row4 col9 output: "A . . . . . . . O B" Actually row4 is " . . . . . R . . . A"? Wait need to read row4 output: from given: Row4 line: "A . . . . . . . O B"? Let's re-evaluate list. Given output lines: 1: ". . . . O B M . . ." 2: "R . . . . A . . . ." 3: "B M . . . . . . . R" 4: "A . . . . . . . O B" 5: ". . . . . R . . . A" 6: ". . . . O B M . . ." 7: ". . . . . A . . . ." 8: ". . R . . . . . . ." 9: ". O B M . . . . . R" 10: ". . A . . . . . O B" Let's index rows 0-9. Row0: . . . . O B M . . . Row1: R . . . . A . . . . Row2: B M . . . . . . . R Row3: A . . . . . . . O B Row4: . . . . . R . . . A Row5: . . . . O B M . . . Row6: . . . . . A . . . . Row7: . . R . . . . . . . Row8: . O B M . . . . . R Row9: . . A . . . . . O B Now B at (3,9). Up neighbor (2,9) = R correct. Left neighbor (3,8) = O correct. Down neighbor (4,9) = A correct. Right neighbor none (edge). So mapping consistent. Check B at (5,5). Row5 col5 B. Up neighbor (4,5) = R? Row4 col5 = R yes. Down neighbor (6,5) = A? Row6 col5 = A yes. Left neighbor (5,4) = O? Row5 col4 = O yes. Right neighbor (5,6) = M? Row5 col6 = M yes. B at (8,2). Row8 col2 B. Up neighbor (7,2) = R? Row7 col2 = R yes. Down neighbor (9,2) = A? Row9 col2 = A yes. Left neighbor (8,1) = O? Row8 col1 = O yes. Right neighbor (8,3) = M? Row8 col3 = M yes. B at (9,9). Row9 col9 B. Up neighbor (8,9) = R? Row8 col9 = R yes. Left n ... [3898 chars truncated]
"Blue command posts are established across a dark battlefield. Each post deploys four differently-flagged scouts — one marching one step in each cardinal direction, each scout carrying a banner of a distinct color to mark their assigned heading."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield with blue command posts at scattered positions.
Do: Each command post sends one uniquely colored scout one step into each cardinal direction.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has blue B at various positions. Output shows additional colors around each B: each B sends scouts one step in each cardinal direction, each scout uniquely colored. So from each B, we place colors in up, down, left, right cells (if within bounds). The scouts have unique colors per direction? Let's examine example. Example 1 Input positions of B (list coordinates row,col): Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Now output grid: Let's map. I'll create grid 10x10 output. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." Indices:0-9. So at row0 col5 is B (same). At col4 is O, col6 is M. So left of B got O, right got M. Up would be row -1 (none). Down row1 col5? Row1 col5 in output is? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . .". At col5 is A. So down got A. So mapping: left=O, right=M, down=A. Up missing. Row1: "R . . . . A . . . ." There is R at col0? That's from B at row2 col0 maybe? Let's see B at (2,0). Its up cell (1,0) gets R. So up direction gets R. Down cell (3,0) gets? Row3 col0 is "A". Indeed row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". So down got A. Left of (2,0) none, right (2,1) gets? Row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". At col1 is M. So right got M. So for B at (2,0): up=R, right=M, down=A, left none. Now B at (3,9). Output row3 col9 is B. Left (3,8) is O. Right none. Up (2,9) is R. Down (4,9) is B? Wait row4 col9 is "B"? Row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". Actually col9 is A. So down got A. So mapping: left O, up R, down A. B at (5,5). Output row5 col5 B. Left (5,4) O. Right (5,6) M. Up (4,5) R? Row4 col5 is R. Down (6,5) A? Row6 col5 is A. Yes. B at (8,2). Output row8 col2 B. Left (8,1) O. Right (8,3) M. Up (7,2) R? Row7 col2 is R. Down (9,2) A? Row9 col2 is A. Indeed row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". Yes. B at (9,9). Output row9 col9 B. Left (9,8) O. Up (8,9) R. Down none. Right none. So left O, up R. Thus mapping of direction to color appears consistent across all B's: Up -> R (red) Down -> A (azure) Left -> O (orange) Right -> M (magenta) Thus each B sends scouts: up red, down azure, left orange, right magenta. Now also note that some cells may receive multiple scouts from different B's? In example, there is no overlap? Let's check maybe overlapping could happen but not in given. Also note that original B cells remain B. All other cells remain '.' unless filled by scouts. Thus rule: For each blue cell, place R above, A below, O left, M right (if within grid). Keep original B. Now apply to test input. Test Input grid 10x10: Row0: ". B . . . . . . . B" Row1: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . . . . . B . ." Row3: ". . . B . . . . . ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row6: "B . . . . . . B . ." Row7: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row8: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row9: ". . . . B . . . . ." Let's list coordinates (row,col) of B: (0,1) (0,9) (2,7) (3,3) (6,0) (6,7) (9,4) Now we will create output grid initially copy of input (B's stay). Then for each B, place scouts. Define direction offsets: Up: ... [3872 chars truncated]
"On a darkened stage, blue spotlights mark the positions of solo performers. As the scene begins, each performer gestures outward and four differently-colored follow spots ignite — one illuminating the space directly above, below, left, and right of the performer, each gel a different hue."
120b: k=1
See: A dark stage with blue spotlights marking performer positions.
Do: Each performer triggers four uniquely colored follow spots, one in each cardinal neighbor cell.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule. Input has blue spots B. Output shows many other colors around each B. Let's analyze example1. I'll map coordinates. 10x10. I'll label rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1 positions of B: Row0 col5 Row2 col0 Row3 col9 Row5 col5 Row8 col2 Row9 col9 Output example1 grid: need to see colors at those positions and neighbors. Let's write output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at (0,5) B remains B? Yes output has B at col5. Also O at col4, M at col6. So left neighbor O, right neighbor M. Also maybe up/down? Up doesn't exist, down neighbor row1 col5 is? Row1: "R . . . . A . . . .". At col5 row1 has A. So down neighbor is A. Up neighbor none. So each B triggers colors in four cardinal directions: up, down, left, right. The colors are unique per direction: maybe up=R, down=A, left=O, right=M. Let's verify with other B. B at (2,0). Output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". So at (2,0) B stays B. Right neighbor (2,1) is M. Down neighbor (3,0) is A? Row3: "A . . . . . . . O B". At col0 row3 is A. Up neighbor (1,0) is R? Row1 col0 is R. Left neighbor none. Also maybe left neighbor would be O but none. So mapping: up=R, down=A, left=O, right=M. Consistent. Check B at (3,9). Output row3 col9 is B. Left neighbor (3,8) is O. Up neighbor (2,9) is R? Row2 col9 is R. Down neighbor (4,9) is B? Wait row4: ". . . . . R . . . A". At col9 row4 is A. Actually row4 col9 is A. So down neighbor A. Right neighbor none. So left O, up R, down A. Good. B at (5,5). Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So left O at (5,4), right M at (5,6), up (4,5) is R? Row4 col5 is R. Down (6,5) is A? Row6: ". . . . . A . . . .". Yes A at (6,5). Good. B at (8,2). Output row8: ". O B M . . . . . R". So left O at (8,1), right M at (8,3), up (7,2) is R? Row7: ". . R . . . . . . .". Yes R at (7,2). Down (9,2) is A? Row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". At col2 row9 is A. Good. B at (9,9). Output row9: ". . A . . . . . O B". So left O at (9,8), up (8,9) is R, down none, right none. Up R matches. So rule: For each blue cell B, place colored markers in its four orthogonal neighbor cells (if within grid) with specific colors: up=R, down=A, left=O, right=M. Also original B stays B. No other changes. Check that other cells not affected remain '.' (black). Indeed. Thus transformation rule identified. Now apply to test input. Test Input B positions: Let's list coordinates. Row0: ". B . . . . . . . B" => B at (0,1) and (0,9) Row1: none Row2: ". . . . . . . B . ." => B at (2,7) Row3: ". . . B . . . . . ." => B at (3,3) Row4: none Row5: none Row6: "B . . . . . . B . ." => B at (6,0) and (6,7) Row7: none Row8: none Row9: ". . . . B . . . . ." => B at (9,4) Now we need to produce output grid 10x10, initially all '.' then place B at same positions, and for each B place R up, A down, O left, M right (if within bounds). If multiple B affect same cell, what happens? In example, there were no overlaps? Could be overlapping colors maybe priority? Need to consider. Let's see if ... [3193 chars truncated]
"Blue seed pods rest in dark soil. When spring arrives, each pod splits open and sends four differently-colored roots and shoots into the cardinal directions — each tendril emerges one cell away and blooms in a color unique to its compass bearing."
120b: k=1
See: Dark soil with blue seed pods scattered at various positions.
Do: Each seed pod sprouts one uniquely colored tendril into each cardinal neighbor.
Grid: 10x10 grid, black background. Row 0 is top, column 0 is left. Dimensions unchanged.
We need to infer rule from example. Input has blue B seeds on black background. Output shows additional colors around each B: each B sprouts one uniquely colored tendril into each cardinal neighbor (up, down, left, right). Colors: there are 5 colors total? In output we see B remains, plus O, M, R, A around. Let's map directions to colors maybe. Take example 1. Let's list coordinates (row, col) of B in input. Grid 10x10. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1: Row0: col5 B Row2: col0 B Row3: col9 B Row5: col5 B Row8: col2 B Row9: col9 B Also maybe others? Row? That's all. Now output: we need to see colors around each B. Let's write output grid coordinates. I'll parse output rows. Row0: ". . . . O B M . . ." So at row0 col4 O, col5 B, col6 M. Thus left neighbor (col4) O, right neighbor (col6) M. Up neighbor would be row -1 none, down neighbor row1 col5? Row1 col5 is? Row1 output: "R . . . . A . . . .". So row1 col5 A. So down neighbor is A. Thus for B at (0,5): left O, right M, down A. Up none. Now B at (2,0): output row2: "B M . . . . . . . R". So at (2,0) B remains. Right neighbor (2,1) M. Down neighbor (3,0) A? Row3 output: "A . . . . . . . O B". So (3,0) A. Up neighbor (1,0) R? Row1 col0 R. Yes. Thus mapping: Up = R, Left = O, Right = M, Down = A. That matches earlier B at (0,5) left O, right M, down A, up none (since top edge). Good. Now check B at (3,9): output row3 col9 B. Left neighbor (3,8) O. Right none. Up neighbor (2,9) R? Row2 col9 R. Down neighbor (4,9) B? Wait row4 output: "A . . . . . . . O B". Row4 col9 B? Actually row4 output: "A . . . . . . . O B". So col9 B? That's a B at (4,9). But there is already a B there originally? Input had B at (5,5) and (9,9) etc. Not at (4,9). So new B appears? Wait maybe that's a different B from input? Let's check input B list: there is B at (5,5) and (9,9). Not at (4,9). So output shows B at (4,9) maybe from seed sprouting? But rule said only original B remain, and neighbors get colored (O,M,R,A). Not new B. So maybe there is also a B at (4,9) originally? Let's double-check input row4 (index 4) line: ". . . . . . . . . .". No B. So why B appears at (4,9) in output? Let's examine output row4: "A . . . . . . . O B". So at (4,0) A, (4,8) O, (4,9) B. That B could be from original B at (5,5) maybe? No. Let's examine B at (5,5) input. Output row5: ". . . . O B M . . .". So B at (5,5) remains. Left O at (5,4), right M at (5,6). Up neighbor (4,5) ? Row4 col5 is '.' (since row4 output: "A . . . . . . . O B", col5 is '.' ), but down neighbor (6,5) row6 output: ". . . . . A . . . .", col5 A. So down A at (6,5). Up is '.'? Wait there is no R above because maybe there is a B above at (0,5) but not adjacent. So up neighbor of (5,5) is (4,5) which is '.' not R. So rule maybe only place R if there is a B above? No earlier B at (2,0) had up neighbor R at (1,0) even though there is no B above. So why not R at (4,5)? Let's check if (4,5) is occupied by something else maybe O or M from other B? N ... [7175 chars truncated]
See: A grid with exactly 3 rows. Each column contains exactly one grey (X) cell; all other cells are black (.). The grey cells trace a zigzag path across the columns.
Do: Determine the index of the last column (width minus 1) and note whether it is even or odd. For every grey (X) cell in the grid, check the parity of its column index. If the column index shares the same parity (even/odd) as the last column index, recolor that cell green (G). Otherwise, leave it as grey (X). All black (.) cells remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid is always exactly 3 rows tall. Width varies but each column contains exactly one non-background cell. The background color is black (.). The only non-background colors are grey (X) in the input, and grey (X) plus green (G) in the output.
"A strand of holiday lights where every other bulb switches on at dusk"
120b: k=1
See: A single strand of holiday lights is strung across three hooks, zigzagging up and down. Each vertical post holds exactly one unlit grey bulb; the rest of the strand is dark wire.
Do: As evening falls, the strand checks which side of the street the last post stands on. Bulbs that stand on the same side as that final post flicker to life in green. The others stay dormant and grey, waiting for a different night.
Grid: The strand always spans exactly three hooks tall. The dark wire is black (.), unlit bulbs are grey (X), and bulbs that catch the evening current glow green (G).
We need to infer rule. From description: three hooks tall (grid height = 3). Strand is a path zigzagging across three hooks? Input shows black '.' and grey 'X' positions. Output changes some X to G based on side of final post? Need to interpret. Look at Example1. Input grid 3 rows, columns? Let's write coordinates. I'll parse. Input rows: Row0: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's count: tokens separated by space. Row0: [.,.,X,.,.,X,.,X,.,.,.,X,.] length 13? Let's count: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 X,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 X,13 . => 13 columns. Row1: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" => length 13. Row2: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." => length 13. Output rows: Row0: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." Row1: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" Row2: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So rule: some X become G. Which ones? Let's map positions. Create coordinates (r,c). Input X positions: Row0 col2,5,7,11? Wait col indices starting 0. Row0: col2 X, col5 X, col7 X, col11 X. Row1: col0 X, col4 X, col6 X, col9 X, col12 X. Row2: col1 X, col3 X, col8 X, col10 X. Output: G positions: Row0 col2 becomes G (was X). Others unchanged: col5 stays X, col7 X, col11 X unchanged. Row1: col0 becomes G (was X). col4 becomes G (was X). col6 becomes G (was X). col9 stays X. col12 becomes G (was X). Row2: col8 becomes G (was X). col10 becomes G (was X). Others unchanged. So which X become G? It seems maybe those that are part of a continuous diagonal "strand" that goes from top-left to bottom-right? Let's visualize pattern: maybe the strand is a path that moves down-right or up-right each step, like a zigzag across three rows. Starting at some column, goes through rows 0-2 repeatedly. The X's represent bulbs (grey). The strand is the set of X's that are connected in a zigzag pattern (adjacent horizontally? maybe diagonal?). The rule: turn those X that are on same side as final post? Need to interpret description: "single strand of holiday lights is strung across three hooks, zigzagging up and down. Each vertical post holds exactly one unlit grey bulb; the rest of the strand is dark wire." So each column (vertical post) has exactly one X (bulb) among three rows. Indeed check input: each column should have exactly one X? Let's verify column wise for example1. Column0: row0 ., row1 X, row2 . => one X. Column1: row0 ., row1 ., row2 X => one X. Column2: row0 X, row1 ., row2 . => one X. Column3: row0 ., row1 ., row2 X? Wait column3 row2 X yes. So each column has exactly one X. Good. Thus the strand is the sequence of X's across columns, forming a path that moves up/down each column (maybe staying same row? but each column only one X). The path zigzags: row index changes each column, moving up or down by 1? Let's check example1 sequence of rows per column (0-12): col0 row1 col1 row2 col2 row0 col3 row2 col4 row1 col5 row0 col6 row1 col7 row0 col8 row2 col9 row1 col10 row2 col11 row0 col12 row1 Now see transitions: 1->2 (down), 2->0 (up two?), that's not just +/-1. Actually rows are ... [8072 chars truncated]
"A strand of DNA where certain nucleotides fluoresce under UV light, but only those that fall on the same breathing rhythm as the final base in the chain."
120b: k=1
See: A single-file procession of marked cells winding through three narrow lanes, like nucleotides along a twisted backbone.
Do: Let the terminal nucleotide set the cadence. Every marked cell that pulses in sync with it lights up green; those on the off-beat remain inert grey.
Grid: Three rows forming the backbone. Each column holds exactly one marked cell. Background is black (.), marked cells begin grey (X) and some become green (G).
We need to infer rule. Input grid: 3 rows, many columns. Each column has exactly one marked cell (X) and others are '.'? Let's check example 1 input. Example1 Input rows (I'll index columns): Row0: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row1: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row2: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Count columns: let's count: row0 length? tokens separated by space. Let's write indices: col0: row0 '.' row1 'X' row2 '.' col1: '.' '.' 'X' col2: 'X' '.' '.' col3: '.' '.' 'X' col4: '.' 'X' '.' col5: 'X' '.' '.' col6: '.' 'X' '.' col7: 'X' '.' '.' col8: '.' '.' 'X' col9: '.' 'X' '.' col10: '.' '.' 'X' col11: 'X' '.' '.' col12: '.' 'X' '.' Indeed each column has exactly one X. Good. Output example1: Row0: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row1: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row2: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Now we see some X turned to G (green) while others remain X. Which columns changed? Let's compare column by column. I'll list columns with input X row and output char at that position. col0: input X at row1. output row1 is G (changed). So column0 changed to G. col1: input X at row2. output row2 is X (unchanged). So not changed. col2: input X at row0. output row0 is G (changed). So column2 changed. col3: input X at row2. output row2 is X (unchanged). So not changed. col4: input X at row1. output row1 is G (changed). column4 changed. col5: input X at row0. output row0 is X (unchanged). column5 unchanged. col6: input X at row1. output row1 is G (changed). column6 changed. col7: input X at row0. output row0 is X (unchanged). column7 unchanged. col8: input X at row2. output row2 is G (changed). column8 changed. col9: input X at row1. output row1 is X (unchanged). column9 unchanged. col10: input X at row2. output row2 is G (changed). column10 changed. col11: input X at row0. output row0 is X (unchanged). column11 unchanged. col12: input X at row1. output row1 is G (changed). column12 changed. Pattern: seems alternating columns? Let's list changed columns indices: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 (even indices). Unchanged: 1,3,5,7,9,11 (odd). Indeed all even columns changed to G, odd remain X. But also note column0 is even (0). So rule: terminal nucleotide sets cadence? "Let the terminal nucleotide set the cadence." Maybe the last column (rightmost) determines pattern? In example, rightmost column index 12 is even and changed to G. Maybe the terminal nucleotide (the X in last column) defines whether to start with green at that column and then alternate leftwards? Let's test: In example, last column (col12) has X at row1, output G. So terminal becomes green. Then moving leftwards, alternate: column11 should be X (off-beat) - indeed unchanged. column10 green - changed. So pattern matches alternating from rightmost column. Thus rule: Starting from rightmost column, set that X to G, then moving left, alternate between G and X (i.e., every other column becomes G). So essentially columns with same parity as rightmost column become G. Check: rightmost column index parity determines w ... [4851 chars truncated]
"Stars along a three-band constellation chart — the terminal star's position in the sky determines which stars flare into green brilliance during the alignment and which remain dim grey dwarfs."
120b: k=1
See: Grey stars placed one per column across three celestial bands, tracing a serpentine constellation.
Do: The final star in the sequence sets the resonance. Stars whose orbital positions harmonize with it ignite green; the others stay grey.
Grid: Three rows (sky bands). One X per column. Black is void. Some X turn G.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows, columns? Let's count. Example1 input rows: Row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's count tokens: 13? Let's count: 1 . ,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 X,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 X,13 . =>13 columns. Row2: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" count: 13 as well. Row3: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." count 13. Output rows: Row1: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." Row2: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" Row3: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." We need to see transformation: Some X become G, some remain X. Also some . become G? In output row2 col1 is G while input row2 col1 was X? Wait input row2 col1 = X, output row2 col1 = G. So X turned to G. Also row2 col5 input X -> output G. Row2 col7 X -> G. Row2 col13 X -> G. Row1 col3 input X -> output G (since row1 col3 was X, output G). Row1 col6 X stays X (unchanged). Row1 col8 X stays X. Row1 col12 X stays X. Row3 col9 input X -> output G. Row3 col11 input X -> G. Others X remain X. So rule selects certain X to turn green based on "final star in the sequence sets the resonance. Stars whose orbital positions harmonize with it ignite green; the others stay grey." Interpretation: There is one X per column across three rows (i.e., each column has exactly one X). Let's verify: In example, each column should have exactly one X. Let's check column wise. Create columns 1-13: col1: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' => one X yes. col2: row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 'X' => one X. col3: row1 'X'; row2 '.'; row3 '.' => one X. col4: row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 'X' => one X. col5: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' => one X. col6: row1 'X'; row2 '.'; row3 '.' => one X. col7: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' => one X. col8: row1 'X'; row2 '.'; row3 '.' => one X. col9: row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 'X' => one X. col10: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' => one X. col11: row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 'X' => one X. col12: row1 'X'; row2 '.'; row3 '.' => one X. col13: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' => one X. Yes each column exactly one X. So we have a permutation mapping columns to rows (positions). The "final star in the sequence" maybe the last X in reading order? "Grey stars placed one per column across three celestial bands, tracing a serpentine constellation." Could be that the X's form a path moving left to right, maybe snake pattern: each column's X is in a row, and the rows may change gradually (like serpentine). The final star (last column) sets resonance; then we select X's whose row index matches something relative to final? Let's examine which X turned green. List columns where X turned G (output G). From output: Row1 col3 G (col3) Row2 col1 G (col1) Row2 col5 G (col5) Row2 col7 G (col7) Row2 col13 G (col13) Row3 col9 G (col9) Row3 col11 G (col11) Also maybe row1 col? none else. So columns turned green: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13? Wait also col13 yes. That's odd: all odd columns? Let's check: columns 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 are odd. Indeed all odd columns turned green. But note c ... [4421 chars truncated]
"Buoys marking a channel through three depth zones, one buoy per berth. The harbor master at the channel's end raises a flag — buoys whose berths match the flag's signal turn green to mark safe passage; the rest stay grey warning markers."
120b: k=1
See: Grey buoys zigzag across three depth lanes, one per column, charting a serpentine channel.
Do: The final buoy's berth sets the harbor code. Buoys sharing that code's character flip to green; the rest hold grey.
Grid: Three rows (depth zones). One X per column on black (.) water. Some X become G.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows, many columns. Represent '.' black, 'X' grey. Output same size, with some X turned to G (green) and others remain X. Also some '.' become G? In output example row1 col3 originally X becomes G. Row2 col1 originally X becomes G? Wait row2 col1 in input is X (since first column row2 is X). Output row2 col1 is G. Row3 col? Let's map. Let's index columns. Example1 input rows: Row0: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's write indices 0-12. Row0:0 '.';1 '.';2 'X';3 '.';4 '.';5 'X';6 '.';7 'X';8 '.';9 '.';10 '.';11 'X';12 '.' Row1: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" Indices:0 X;1 .;2 .;3 .;4 X;5 .;6 X;7 .;8 .;9 X;10 .;11 .;12 X Row2: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." Indices:0 '.';1 X;2 '.';3 X;4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 X;9 '.';10 X;11 '.';12 '.' Output rows: Row0: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." So at col2 X->G. Others same: col5 X stays X, col7 X stays X, col11 X stays X. Row1: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" So col0 X->G, col4 X->G, col6 X->G, col12 X->G. col9 X stays X. Row2: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So col8 X->G, col10 X->G. Others unchanged. Thus rule: some X become G based on "final buoy's berth sets the harbor code. Buoys sharing that code's character flip to green; the rest hold grey." Interpretation: There is a serpentine path of X across three rows, one per column, zigzag. The "final buoy's berth" maybe the column where the path ends? The path likely goes through X cells forming a continuous line moving left to right across columns, moving up/down rows each column (like a snake). The final buoy's row determines a code (maybe character). Then all X that are in same row as final buoy become G? Let's test. Find path: Starting column 0: there is X at row1 col0. That's start? Then column1: there is X at row2 col1. column2: X at row0 col2. column3: X at row2 col3? Wait column3 has X at row2 (since row2 col3 X). column4: X at row1 col4. column5: X at row0 col5. column6: X at row1 col6. column7: X at row0 col7. column8: X at row2 col8. column9: X at row1 col9. column10: X at row2 col10. column11: X at row0 col11. column12: X at row1 col12. Indeed each column has exactly one X (except maybe some columns have none?). Let's verify: column0 has X row1. column1 X row2. column2 X row0. column3 X row2. column4 X row1. column5 X row0. column6 X row1. column7 X row0. column8 X row2. column9 X row1. column10 X row2. column11 X row0. column12 X row1. Yes each column exactly one X. So it's a path that snakes across rows. Now which X become G? In output, the X that are in rows 0? Let's list G positions: (row0,col2) row0; (row1,col0,4,6,12) row1; (row2,col8,10) row2. That's all X except those at columns5,7,11,9? Wait column5 row0 X stayed X. column7 row0 X stayed X. column11 row0 X stayed X. column9 row1 X stayed X. So not all X become G. Which ones? Let's see pattern: maybe every other X along the path? Starting from first column? Let's list columns order with X rows and whether G: col0 ... [5369 chars truncated]
"A shift register with grey bits loaded across three parallel buses — the terminal bit's state sets a clock phase, and every bit on that phase energizes green while off-phase bits stay dormant grey."
120b: k=1
See: One grey bit per column across three buses, forming a zigzag signal pattern.
Do: The last bit's phase becomes the reference clock. Bits synchronized to that clock activate green; out-of-phase bits remain grey.
Grid: Three rows (buses). One X per column. Black is ground. Some X become G.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows, many columns. Each column has exactly one X? Let's verify. Example1 input rows length? Row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." that's 13? Count: positions 1-13. Row2: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" also 13. Row3: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." also 13. Check each column: column1: row1 '.' row2 'X' row3 '.' => one X. col2: row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 'X' => one X. col3: row1 'X' row2 '.' row3 '.' => one X. So indeed exactly one X per column across three rows, forming a "zigzag" pattern. Output: some X become G (green) based on rule: "last bit's phase becomes reference clock. Bits synchronized to that clock activate green; out-of-phase bits remain grey." Interpretation: The X in each column is a "bit". The "last bit's phase" meaning the X in the last column? The phase maybe which row (bus) the X is in. That row becomes reference. Then for each column, if the X is in same row as reference, turn to G; else keep X (grey). Also maybe the reference column itself becomes G? Let's test. Find last column (13). Input column13: row1 '.' row2 'X' row3 '.' => X in row2. So reference row = row2. Output column13: row1 'X' row2 'G' row3 '.'? Let's see output row1 column13: from output row1 ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." column13 is '.'? Wait need map. Let's write output rows: Row1 output: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." Row2: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" Row3: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." Let's index columns 1-13. Row1 col1 '.'; col2 '.'; col3 'G'; col4 '.'; col5 '.'; col6 'X'; col7 '.'; col8 'X'; col9 '.'; col10 '.'; col11 '.'; col12 'X'; col13 '.' Row2 col1 'G'; col2 '.'; col3 '.'; col4 '.'; col5 'G'; col6 '.'; col7 'G'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'; col10 'X'; col11 '.'; col12 '.'; col13 'G' Row3 col1 '.'; col2 'X'; col3 '.'; col4 'X'; col5 '.'; col6 '.'; col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 'G'; col10 '.'; col11 'G'; col12 '.'; col13 '.' Now compare with input X positions. Input column1: X at row2. Output column1: row2 is G (yes). So turned green because same row as reference (row2). Column2: X at row3. Output column2: row3 is X (still grey) because not same row. Column3: X at row1. Output column3: row1 is G (green) because same row as reference? Wait reference row is row2, not row1. But column3 output G at row1, not row2. So maybe reference is not last column but something else. Let's examine pattern: Which columns turned green? List columns where output has G (any row). Column1 row2 G. Column3 row1 G. Column5 row2 G. Column7 row2 G. Column9 row3 G. Column11 row3 G. Column13 row2 G. Corresponding input X rows: col1 row2 (same as output G row2). col3 row1 (output G row1). col5 row2 (output G row2). col7 row2 (output G row2). col9 row3 (output G row3). col11 row3 (output G row3). col13 row2 (output G row2). So all columns where X turned to G are those where X row matches something? Actually all X turned to G except columns 2,4,6,8,10,12 where X remained X (grey). Let's see rows of those columns: col2 X at row3 (remains ... [5826 chars truncated]
"Runes carved along three branches of Yggdrasil, one per notch. The final rune's nature — root or crown — determines which runes glow with green seiðr and which remain dormant grey stone."
120b: k=1
See: Grey runes placed one per column across three branches of a great tree, winding in a serpentine pattern.
Do: The last rune reveals its nature. All runes sharing that nature awaken in green; the mismatched ones stay cold grey.
Grid: Three rows (branches). One X per column on black (.) bark. Some X glow G.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows, many columns. Represent '.' black, 'X' grey, maybe some G already? In input example 1, there are only '.' and 'X' (no G). Output has some G replacing some X? Let's compare. I'll write columns index. Input row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's index: 1 '.' 2 '.' 3 X 4 '.' 5 '.' 6 X 7 '.' 8 X 9 '.' 10 '.' 11 '.' 12 X 13 '.' Output row1: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." So at column3 X became G. Others unchanged: column6 X stays X, column8 X stays X, column12 X stays X. So only one X turned G. Row2 input: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" Output row2: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" So columns: 1 X -> G, 5 X -> G, 7 X -> G, 10 X stays X, 13 X -> G. So many X turned G, but not all. Row3 input: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." Output row3: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So column2 X stays X, column4 X stays X, column9 X -> G, column11 X -> G. So some X become G. Pattern: "The last rune reveals its nature. All runes sharing that nature awaken in green; the mismatched ones stay cold grey." Interpretation: There is a serpentine pattern across columns (maybe like a path). The "last rune" maybe the last X in reading order along that path determines a "nature" (maybe direction? color?). Then all X that share that nature become G. We need to deduce which X become G based on something like parity of column? Let's list positions of X in input and which become G. Create list of coordinates (row, col). Input X positions: Row1: (1,3), (1,6), (1,8), (1,12) Row2: (2,1), (2,5), (2,7), (2,10), (2,13) Row3: (3,2), (3,4), (3,9), (3,11) Now output G positions: Row1: (1,3) Row2: (2,1), (2,5), (2,7), (2,13) Row3: (3,9), (3,11) So which X turned G? Not turned: (1,6), (1,8), (1,12), (2,10), (3,2), (3,4). So pattern maybe based on connectivity along serpentine path: maybe the path goes through columns sequentially but snakes rows: e.g., start at top left, go right across row1, then down to row2, go left, etc. Let's simulate serpentine: Row1 left to right, Row2 right to left, Row3 left to right. That would create a single path covering all cells. The "last rune" would be the last X encountered along that path. Then "nature" maybe orientation (horizontal vs vertical?) Not. Let's list X order along serpentine path (assuming start at row1 col1). Row1 left->right: columns 1-13. X at 3,6,8,12. Row2 right->left: columns 13 to1. X at 13,10,7,5,1. Row3 left->right: columns1-13. X at 2,4,9,11. Combine order: (1,3),(1,6),(1,8),(1,12),(2,13),(2,10),(2,7),(2,5),(2,1),(3,2),(3,4),(3,9),(3,11). The last X in this order is (3,11). In output, (3,11) became G (yes). So "last rune reveals its nature". So nature maybe something like "is at odd/even column"? Let's see which other X share that nature: which other X became G? Those that share same column parity? (3,11) column 11 odd. Among X, which are odd columns? (1,3) odd, (1,6) even, (1,8) even, (1,12) even, (2,13) odd, (2,10) even, (2,7) odd, (2,5) odd, (2, ... [3544 chars truncated]
"Dancers on a three-row stage taking positions one per beat in a zigzag — the final dancer's footing (left or right) determines which dancers' costumes shimmer green under the lights and which stay matte grey."
120b: k=1
See: Grey dancers placed one per beat across three rows, stepping in an alternating zigzag pattern.
Do: The closing dancer's footing sets the ensemble's color cue. Dancers whose beats share that footing shimmer green; the rest stay grey.
Grid: Three rows. One X per column. Black is empty stage. Some X become G.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: "Grey dancers placed one per beat across three rows, stepping in an alternating zigzag pattern. What to do: The closing dancer's footing sets the ensemble's color cue. Dancers whose beats share that footing shimmer green; the rest stay grey. Grid details: Three rows. One X per column. Black is empty stage. Some X become G." Interpretation: Input grid has three rows, columns variable. Each column has exactly one X (grey dancer) across three rows. So each column has a single X, others are '.' (black). That's like a pattern of a single X per column, forming a zigzag across rows. The "closing dancer's footing" maybe the last column's X row determines something. Dancers whose beats share that footing (i.e., same row as the last X) become green. Others stay grey (X). So output: replace X with G if they are in same row as the last column's X; otherwise keep X. Check example 1. Let's write input columns. Example1 Input rows: Row0: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row1: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row2: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Count columns: let's index. I'll write columns with rows (r0,r1,r2): col0: . , X , . => X at row1 col1: . , . , X => row2 col2: X , . , . => row0 col3: . , . , X => row2 col4: . , X , . => row1 col5: X , . , . => row0 col6: . , X , . => row1 col7: X , . , . => row0 col8: . , . , X => row2 col9: . , X , . => row1 col10: . , . , X => row2 col11: X , . , . => row0 col12: . , X , . => row1 So last column (col12) has X at row1. So row1 is the "closing dancer's footing". According to rule, all X in row1 become G, others stay X. Now output example1 rows: Row0 output: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row1: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row2: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Let's verify: Row0 originally had X at columns 2,5,7,11. In output row0: at col2 is G (yes), col5 is X (unchanged), col7 X unchanged, col11 X unchanged. Wait col5 originally X at row0, but output shows X (unchanged). So rule not all X become G only those in row1. Indeed row0 X remain X. Good. Row1 originally X at cols0,4,6,9,12. Output row1: G at col0, G at col4, G at col6, X at col9 (unchanged), G at col12. So col9 remained X, but row1 is the target row, why not G? Let's check: col9 originally X at row1? Input col9: row1 had X? Let's verify earlier list: col9 had X at row1 (since we had . , X , .). Yes row1. But output shows X at col9, not G. So rule not simply all X in that row become G. Something else: maybe only those X that share the same "beat" (i.e., column) as the closing dancer? Wait "Dancers whose beats share that footing shimmer green; the rest stay grey." Could mean columns where the X is in same row as the last column's row? Actually "beats share that footing" maybe means columns where the X is in the same row as the closing dancer's row? That's what we thought. But col9 contradicts. Let's examine pattern: Which X turned to G? In output, G positions: (row0,col2), (row1,col0), (row1,co ... [8075 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins threading through three strata of rock, one crystal per column. The outermost crystal's bedding plane determines which veins oxidize to green copper patina and which remain unweathered grey ore."
120b: k=4
See: Grey mineral deposits zigzag through three rock layers, one crystal per vertical shaft.
Do: The terminal crystal's bedding sets the oxidation pattern. Crystals sharing its bedding weather to green; the rest persist as grey ore.
Grid: Three strata (rows). One X per column on black (.) matrix. Some X oxidize to G.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 3 rows (strata). Input has '.' black and 'X' grey. Output may have 'G' green replacing some X, others stay X. Also sometimes '.' become G? In examples, first row: Example1 input row1: . . X . . X . X . . . X . ; output row1: . . G . . X . X . . . X . So first X at col3 became G, second X at col6 stayed X, third X at col8 stayed X? Wait output row1 col8 is X (same). Actually output row1 col8 is X (unchanged). So only some X become G. Row2: input row2: X . . . X . X . . X . . X ; output row2: G . . . G . G . . X . . G. So first X became G, second X at col5 became G, third X at col7 became G, fourth X at col10 stayed X, last X at col13 became G. Row3: input row3: . X . X . . . . X . X . . ; output row3: . X . X . . . . G . G . . . So X at col9 became G, X at col11 became G, others unchanged. Observation: Some columns have exactly one X per column across rows? The description: "One X per column on black (.) matrix." Means each column has exactly one X in the three rows? Let's verify example1: Count columns. Let's index columns 1-13? Input rows length 13? Row1: . . X . . X . X . . . X . => 13 columns. Row2: X . . . X . X . . X . . X => 13. Row3: . X . X . . . . X . X . . => 13. Check each column: col1: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col2: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col3: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col4: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col5: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col6: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col7: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col8: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col9: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col10: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col11: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col12: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col13: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. Yes each column exactly one X. Thus we have three rows representing three strata, each column has a vertical shaft with a crystal (X) at a particular layer (row). The "terminal crystal's bedding sets the oxidation pattern. Crystals sharing its bedding weather to green; the rest persist as grey ore." Interpretation: The "terminal crystal" maybe the bottommost X? Or the one in the last column? Or maybe the X that is at the bottom row (row3) in the rightmost column? Let's examine which X become G. In example1, which X turned G? Row1 col3 (X) became G. Row2 col1,5,7,13 became G. Row3 col9,11 became G. So pattern: maybe those X that are in same row as the "terminal crystal's bedding". Which row is terminal? Possibly the row that contains the X in the rightmost column (col13). In example1, column13 has X at row2. So terminal crystal is at row2. Then all X that are also in row2 become G (they share its bedding). Indeed row2 X at col1,5,7,13 all turned G. Also row2 X at col10 stayed X (but row2 col10 is X? Wait column10 has X at row2, yes row2 col10 is X, but output row2 col10 stayed X, not G. Hmm contradictory. Let's check: column10 input row2 X, output row2 ... [9700 chars truncated]
"A skewer of alternating ingredients laid across a grill — the last morsel on the stick determines which pieces catch the flame's kiss and which merely warm."
120b: k=1
See: A single thread of grey morsels threaded through three rails, one morsel per vertical slot, zigzagging like food on a kebab.
Do: Glance at the final morsel's position on the skewer and let its alignment choose which pieces char to green. The rest stay pale and uncooked.
Grid: Exactly three rows. One grey (X) cell per column on a black (.) field. Some grey cells transform to green (G) in the output.
We need to infer rule. Let's examine example. Input grid 3 rows, many columns. Each column has exactly one X (grey) and other cells are '.' (black). Output: some X become G (green) based on final morsel's position on the skewer and its alignment choose which pieces char to green. "single thread of grey morsels threaded through three rails, one morsel per vertical slot, zigzagging like food on a kebab." So X's form a path moving down/up across rows as we go columns left to right. It's like a snake that moves one row up or down each column? Let's map positions. Example1 input rows (I'll index rows 0,1,2). Write columns: I'll parse quickly. Row0: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row1: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row2: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Let's list column indices with X rows. col0: row1 X col1: row2 X col2: row0 X col3: row2 X? Wait row0 col3 '.' row1 '.' row2 X? row2 has X at col3 yes. col4: row0 '.' row1 X row2 '.' => row1 X col5: row0 X row1 '.' row2 '.' => row0 X col6: row0 '.' row1 X row2 '.' => row1 X col7: row0 X row1 '.' row2 '.' => row0 X col8: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 X => row2 X col9: row0 '.' row1 X row2 '.' => row1 X col10: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 X => row2 X col11: row0 X row1 '.' row2 '.' => row0 X col12: row0 '.' row1 X row2 '.' => row1 X So sequence of rows: [1,2,0,2,1,0,1,0,2,1,2,0,1] Now output grid: we need to see which X turned to G. Output rows: Row0: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row1: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row2: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Let's list X positions in output (some changed to G). Determine for each column which char. col0: row0 '.' row1 G (was X) row2 '.' => changed to G. col1: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 X (unchanged) col2: row0 G (was X) row1 '.' row2 '.' => G col3: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 X unchanged col4: row0 '.' row1 G (was X) row2 '.' => G col5: row0 X unchanged (was X) row1 '.' row2 '.' => X stays X col6: row0 '.' row1 G (was X) row2 '.' => G col7: row0 X unchanged row1 '.' row2 '.' => X unchanged col8: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 G (was X) => G col9: row0 '.' row1 X unchanged row2 '.' => X unchanged col10: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 G (was X) => G col11: row0 X unchanged row1 '.' row2 '.' => X unchanged col12: row0 '.' row1 G (was X) row2 '.' => G So which columns turned to G? columns: 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 (even indices?) Indeed they are even columns (0-based) where X existed. Let's check column5 (odd) remained X. Column7 odd remained X. Column9 odd X unchanged. Column11 odd X unchanged. So rule: turn X to G on columns where the "final morsel's position on the skewer" maybe last X row? Let's see pattern: maybe we look at the path and take every other X starting from first? The sequence rows: 1,2,0,2,1,0,1,0,2,1,2,0,1. The columns where we turned to G correspond to columns 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 i.e., every other column starting with first. So we color every X in even-indexed columns (0-based) to G, leaving odd columns X unchanged. But is that always? Let's verify wit ... [5231 chars truncated]
"Notes on a three-line staff where the conductor's baton, raised or lowered at the final measure, determines which notes ring out and which are muted."
120b: k=1
See: A sequence of grey notes placed one per beat across a three-line staff, stepping up and down in a zigzag melody.
Do: The last note whispers its footing to the rest. Notes sharing that same footing sing out in green; the others hold silent in grey.
Grid: Three rows (staff lines), one note (X) per column on black (.) background. Output replaces select X with G.
We need to infer rule. From description: three rows staff, one note per column on black background. Input has X marks (grey notes) placed one per column across three rows? Actually each column may have X in one of three rows (maybe multiple?). In examples, each column seems to have exactly one X (maybe). Let's verify Example1 input grid 3 rows, length? Let's write columns: Row1: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row2: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row3: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Count columns: Row1 length 13? Let's count: positions 1-13. Row2 also 13. Row3 13. Check each column for X: col1: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => X in row2 col2: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => row3 col3: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => row1 col4: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => row3 col5: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => row2 col6: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => row1 col7: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => row2 col8: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => row1 col9: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => row3 col10: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => row2 col11: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => row3 col12: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => row1 col13: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => row2 So indeed exactly one X per column. Now output grid: same size, but some X become G (green). Let's see which columns turned green. Output rows: Row1: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row2: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row3: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Now compare column by column: col1: input X at row2, output G at row2 (since row2 now G). So column1 turned green. col2: input X at row3, output X remains X (row3 still X). So not green. col3: input X at row1, output G at row1 (green). So column3 green. col4: input X at row3, output X remains X (row3 X). Not green. col5: input X at row2, output G at row2. green. col6: input X at row1, output X remains X (row1 X). Not green. col7: input X at row2, output G at row2. green. col8: input X at row1, output X remains X (row1 X). Not green. col9: input X at row3, output G at row3. green. col10: input X at row2, output X remains X (row2 X). Not green. col11: input X at row3, output G at row3. green. col12: input X at row1, output X remains X (row1 X). Not green. col13: input X at row2, output G at row2. green. Pattern: alternating columns? Let's list green columns: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 (odd columns). Non-green: 2,4,6,8,10,12 (even). Indeed seems every other column starting with first column green. But description: "The last note whispers its footing to the rest. Notes sharing that same footing sing out in green; the others hold silent in grey." Maybe "footing" refers to row (staff line) of the last note (last column). The last note's row determines which notes share that same row become green. Let's test: last column (13) has X at row2. In output, all columns where X is at row2 become green? Let's see: columns where X at row2 are 1,5,7,10?,13. Actually column10 X at row2 but output column10 remained X (not green). So not all. Check columns with X at row2: col1 (green), col5 (green), col7 (green), col10 (not green ... [4014 chars truncated]
"Runners on a three-lane track, each occupying one lane per stride. At the finish line, the final runner's lane assignment decides which teammates earn jerseys and which stay in practice grey."
120b: k=2
See: A zigzag of grey markers across three lanes, exactly one marker per stride-length column.
Do: Check the finish post's alignment. Runners whose stride positions match that alignment receive green jerseys; the rest keep their grey ones.
Grid: Three rows (lanes), one X per column. Black (.) is empty track. Some X become G based on their relationship to the final column.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse examples. We have 3 rows, columns variable. Input has X markers (grey) exactly one per column? Let's check example1 input rows length? Row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." that's 13 columns? Count: positions 1-13. Row2: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" also 13. Row3: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." also 13. Indeed each column has exactly one X across three rows? Let's verify column by column: col1: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col2: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col3: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. So yes each column exactly one X. Output: some X become G (green) based on relationship to final column? Description: "Check the finish post's alignment. Runners whose stride positions match that alignment receive green jerseys; the rest keep their grey ones." So maybe we look at pattern of X positions (which row) across columns, treat as a path (zigzag). The final column's X row is the "finish post alignment". Then we compare each column's X row to that of final column? If matches, turn to G else keep X? Let's test. Example1: final column (col13) input: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => X in row2. So finish row = row2. Output: column13: row1 ., row2 G, row3 . (X turned to G). Indeed matches. Check other columns: column1 input X in row2, output row2 G? Output column1 row2 is G (yes). Column2 input X in row3, output row3 X? Output column2 row3 is X (unchanged). Column3 input X in row1, output row1 G? Output column3 row1 is G (yes). Column4 input X in row2? Wait column4 input row1 ., row2 ., row3 X? Actually column4: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X (since row3 pattern . X . X ...). So X in row3, output column4 row3 is X (unchanged). Column5 input X in row1? Row1 column5 is .? Let's list input rows with indices: Row1: 1 .;2 .;3 X;4 .;5 .;6 X;7 .;8 X;9 .;10 .;11 .;12 X;13 . Row2: 1 X;2 .;3 .;4 .;5 X;6 .;7 X;8 .;9 .;10 X;11 .;12 .;13 X Row3: 1 .;2 X;3 .;4 X;5 .;6 .;7 .;8 .;9 X;10 .;11 X;12 .;13 . Now output rows: Row1 out: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row2 out: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row3 out: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Let's compare column by column: For each column, if the X row equals finish row (row2), then X becomes G; else stays X. Check column1: X row2 => G (yes). Column2: X row3 => stays X (row3 X). Output column2 row3 is X (yes). Column3: X row1 => becomes G (row1 G). Column4: X row3 => stays X (row3 X). Column5: X row2 => becomes G (row2 G). Column6: X row1? Wait column6 input row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => X row1, output row1 X (still X). Indeed column6 output row1 is X (unchanged). Column7: X row2 => becomes G (row2 G). Column8: X row1? Actually column8 input row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => X row1, output row1 X (unchanged). Column9: X row3 => stays X? Output column9 row3 is G? Wait output column9 row3 is G (looking at row3 out: ". X . X . . . . G . G . .": column9 is G). But input column9 X row3 (since row3 column9 X). Finish row is row2, so should stay X, but output shows G. Let's verify column ... [7086 chars truncated]
"A barometric ribbon where pressure readings alternate between troughs and ridges — the final reading on the chart determines which systems intensify into green storms and which dissipate."
120b: k=1
See: Grey pressure markers placed one per column across three atmospheric layers, undulating like a weather front.
Do: The rightmost reading sets the phase. Markers in phase with it deepen to green; markers out of phase fade to grey calm.
Grid: Three rows of atmosphere. One X per column on black. Output selectively greens certain X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3 rows, many columns. There are '.' black cells, 'X' grey markers, maybe other colors? In example input only '.' and 'X'. Output has some X unchanged, some become G (green), some '.' become G? Let's examine. Example1 Input row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's index columns 1..13. Row1 input: 1 . 2 . 3 X 4 . 5 . 6 X 7 . 8 X 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 X 13 . Output row1: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." So at col3 X became G? Wait output col3 is G (green). Input col3 was X. So X turned to G. col6 remains X (unchanged). col8 X unchanged. col12 X unchanged. So only some X become G. Row2 input: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" Output row2: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" So col1 X -> G, col5 X -> G, col7 X -> G, col10 X stays X, col13 X -> G. So many X become G, but col10 stays X. Row3 input: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." Output row3: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So col2 X unchanged, col4 X unchanged, col9 X -> G, col11 X -> G. Observation: Some X become G based on "rightmost reading sets the phase". Perhaps we look at each column? "Grey pressure markers placed one per column across three atmospheric layers". Means each column has exactly one X? Let's verify: In example input, each column should have exactly one X across three rows. Let's check columns 1-13: col1: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X yes. col2: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col3: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col4: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col5: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col6: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col7: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col8: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col9: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col10: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. col11: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X. col12: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X. col13: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X. Yes each column has exactly one X. So the grid is like three rows, each column has a marker in one of the rows. Now rule: "The rightmost reading sets the phase. Markers in phase with it deepen to green; markers out of phase fade to grey calm." Interpretation: The rightmost column (last column) determines a "phase" maybe which row is considered "in phase". The marker (X) in that column is at some row (1,2,3). Then for other columns, if the marker is in same row as rightmost marker, turn to G; else stay X (grey). That matches example: Rightmost column is column13, marker at row2 (since row2 has X). So phase row = 2. Then any column where X is in row2 should become G. Let's test. Columns where X in row2: col1 (row2 X) -> G yes. col5 -> G yes. col7 -> G yes. col10 -> X? Wait col10 row2 X, but output kept X (not G). Hmm contradictory. col13 row2 X -> G yes. So col10 didn't follow. Check column10: In input row2 X, output row2 column10 is X (unchanged). So why not G? Maybe there is additional condition: "rightmost reading sets the phase. Markers in phase with it deepen to green; markers out of ... [6727 chars truncated]
"A colonnade of grey pillars across three stories, where the cornerstone pillar's placement dictates which columns receive green marble cladding and which remain bare stone."
120b: k=1
See: One grey pillar per vertical bay, placed at varying heights across three floors, creating an undulating roofline.
Do: The cornerstone — the rightmost pillar — sets the pattern. Pillars whose bay positions echo its character are clad in green; the rest stay grey.
Grid: Three rows (floors). One X per column (bay). Black (.) is open air. Some X become G.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: "One grey pillar per vertical bay, placed at varying heights across three floors, creating an undulating roofline." So each column has exactly one X in input? Let's check Example1 input grid 3 rows, many columns. Let's list columns: I'll index. Row0: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row1: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row2: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Count columns: let's count positions: I'll write as list of columns with three entries. col0: row0 '.'; row1 'X'; row2 '.' => one X at row1. col1: '.' '.' 'X' => X at row2. col2: 'X' '.' '.' => X at row0. col3: '.' '.' 'X' => X at row2. col4: '.' 'X' '.' => X at row1. col5: 'X' '.' '.' => X at row0. col6: '.' 'X' '.' => X at row1. col7: 'X' '.' '.' => X at row0. col8: '.' '.' 'X' => X at row2. col9: '.' 'X' '.' => X at row1. col10: '.' '.' 'X' => X at row2. col11: 'X' '.' '.' => X at row0. col12: '.' 'X' '.' => X at row1. Indeed each column has exactly one X (grey pillar). Good. Output: some X become G (green) based on rule: "The cornerstone — the rightmost pillar — sets the pattern. Pillars whose bay positions echo its character are clad in green; the rest stay grey." Interpretation: Rightmost pillar = column with rightmost X (i.e., last column). In example, last column index 12 has X at row1 (since row1 'X'). Its "character" maybe its row position (height). So pattern: columns whose X are in same row as rightmost X become G. Others stay X. Check output: column 12 becomes G? Output row0 col12 '.'? Wait output grid row0 col12 is '.'? Let's see output rows: Row0 output: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row1: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row2: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Let's map columns. col0: row0 '.'; row1 'G'; row2 '.' => X turned G (since original X at row1). Good matches rightmost row1. col1: row0 '.'; row1 '.'; row2 'X' (since output row2 col1 is X) original X at row2, stays X (since not row1). Indeed output shows X at row2 col1? Wait row2 output col1 is X (since row2 line: ". X . X . . . . G . G . .") yes column1 is X. col2: original X at row0, output row0 col2 is G (since row0 col2 G). So turned G? But rightmost row is row1, not row0. Hmm contradictory. Let's verify column indices: maybe I misaligned due to spaces. Let's write input columns with indices and rows. I'll write strings: Row0: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." But there are 13 columns? Let's count tokens: . (0) .(1) X(2) .(3) .(4) X(5) .(6) X(7) .(8) .(9) .(10) X(11) .(12) => 13 columns. Row1: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" Indices: 0 X,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 X,5 .,6 X,7 .,8 .,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 X Row2: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." Indices:0 .,1 X,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 X,11 .,12 . Now output rows: Row0: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." Indices:0 .,1 .,2 G,3 .,4 .,5 X,6 .,7 X,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 X,12 . Row1: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" Indices:0 G,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 G,5 .,6 G,7 .,8 .,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 G Row2: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." Indices:0 .,1 X,2 . ... [6653 chars truncated]
"Sentries posted along a three-tiered battlement, one per watchtower slot. The commander at the far end of the wall signals — and every sentry standing in lockstep with her position lights a green flare; the others hold dark."
120b: fail
See: Grey sentries zigzag across three tiers of wall, one per tower position.
Do: The end-of-wall commander's stance sets the code. Sentries whose positions share her alignment light green flares; misaligned ones stay grey.
Grid: Three rows (battlement tiers). One X per column. Black background. Some X turn G.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have grid with '.' black background, 'X' grey sentries. Output changes some X to G (green) based on alignment with "end-of-wall commander's stance". Probably the last column? Let's examine. Example1 input 3 rows, columns? Let's count first row: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." that's 13? Let's count: positions 1-13. Output row1: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." So X at col3 turned to G? Actually input row1 col3 is X, output row1 col3 is G. Also other X remain X? Input row1 col6 X stays X? output col6 X unchanged. Input col8 X stays X. Input col12 X stays X. So only first X turned green. Row2 input: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" output: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G". So X at col1 turned G, col5 turned G, col7 turned G, col10 stays X, col13 turned G. So many. Row3 input: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." output: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So X at col9 turned G, col11 turned G. Others unchanged. What determines which X become G? Possibly those aligned vertically with a "commander" at end of wall: maybe the rightmost X in each row? In example1, rightmost X per row? Row1 rightmost X at col12 (since col13 is .). That X stays X not G. So not that. Maybe "end-of-wall commander" is the leftmost X? Row1 leftmost X at col3 turned G. Row2 leftmost X at col1 turned G. Row3 leftmost X at col2 is X but stays X (not G). So not. Maybe alignment means same column as a special X in bottom row? Let's examine columns where G appear across rows: In output example1, G at (row1,col3), (row2,col1,5,7,13), (row3,col9,11). Not obvious. Let's look at example2. Input rows length? Row1: ". X . X . . X . X . . ." (12). Output row1: ". G . G . . X . X . . ." So X at col2 turned G, col4 turned G, others unchanged. Row2 input: "X . . . X . . X . . X ." output: "X . . . X . . G . . X ." So X at col8 turned G. Row3 input: ". . X . . X . . . X . X" output: ". . X . . G . . . G . G". So X at col6 turned G, col10 turned G, col12 turned G. So rule seems to turn some X to G based on something like "positions share her alignment". Maybe there is a "commander" at end of wall: maybe the last column (rightmost) that contains an X? In each column, there is a "tower position"? The description: "Grey sentries zigzag across three tiers of wall, one per tower position." So each column has exactly one X? Let's verify. In examples, each column seems to have exactly one X across three rows? Let's test example1: column1: row1 '.' row2 'X' row3 '.' => one X. col2: row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 'X' => one X. col3: row1 X row2 '.' row3 '.' => one X. col4: row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 X => one X. col5: row1 '.' row2 X row3 '.' => one X. col6: row1 X row2 '.' row3 '.' => one X. col7: row1 '.' row2 X row3 '.' => one X. col8: row1 X row2 '.' row3 '.' => one X. col9: row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 X => one X. col10: row1 '.' row2 X row3 '.' => one X. col11: row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 X => one X. col12: row1 X row2 '.' row3 '.' => one X. col13: row1 '.' r ... [10136 chars truncated]
"Actors positioned across three catwalks for a promenade performance — the stage manager at the wings' edge cues which performers step into the green spotlight and which remain in shadow."
120b: k=1
See: One grey figure per column, staggered across three elevated walkways in a zigzag blocking pattern.
Do: The stage manager at the final wing sets the cue. Performers whose marks align with the cue step into green light; the rest remain grey silhouettes.
Grid: Three rows (catwalks). One X per column on black. Select X become G.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 3 rows, many columns. In each column there is exactly one X? Let's check example1 input columns count. Let's write columns: I'll index. Row1: . . X . . X . X . . . X . Row2: X . . . X . X . . X . . X Row3: . X . X . . . . X . X . . Count columns: let's count positions: I'll write as list per column: col1: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' col2: '.'; '.'; 'X' col3: 'X'; '.'; '.' col4: '.'; '.'; 'X' col5: '.'; 'X'; '.' col6: 'X'; '.'; '.' col7: '.'; 'X'; '.' col8: 'X'; '.'; '.' col9: '.'; '.'; 'X' col10: '.'; 'X'; '.' col11: '.'; '.'; 'X' col12: 'X'; '.'; '.' col13: '.'; 'X'; '.' Indeed each column has exactly one X (grey). So rule: select some X's to become G (green) based on "stage manager cue" maybe based on pattern: "One grey figure per column, staggered across three elevated walkways in a zigzag blocking pattern." The description: "One grey figure per column, staggered across three elevated walkways in a zigzag blocking pattern." So the X's are arranged in a zigzag across rows. The transformation: "Performers whose marks align with the cue step into green light; the rest remain grey silhouettes." So we need to select X's that align with some cue (maybe a diagonal line?). In output example, some X become G, others stay X. Let's compare which columns turned G. Output example1 rows: Row1: . . G . . X . X . . . X . Row2: G . . . G . G . . X . . G Row3: . X . X . . . . G . G . . Now mark columns where G appears. col1: row2 G (was X) -> selected col2: none (row3 X remains X) col3: row1 G (was X) selected col4: none (row3 X remains X) col5: row2 G (was X) selected col6: row1 X unchanged (was X) not selected col7: row2 G (was X) selected col8: row1 X unchanged (was X) not selected col9: row3 G (was X) selected col10: row3 G (was X) selected? Wait column10 row3 is G, originally X at row3 col10? Let's check input col10: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.'? Actually earlier we had col10: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' . Wait my earlier list maybe off. Let's recompute columns with indices: I'll write rows strings with indices: Row1: positions 1-13: 1 '.';2 '.';3 'X';4 '.';5 '.';6 'X';7 '.';8 'X';9 '.';10 '.';11 '.';12 'X';13 '.' Row2: 1 'X';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 'X';6 '.';7 'X';8 '.';9 '.';10 'X';11 '.';12 '.';13 'X' Row3: 1 '.';2 'X';3 '.';4 'X';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 'X';10 '.';11 'X';12 '.';13 '.' Now column10: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' -> X at row2. Output column10 row2 is '.'? Output row2 col10 is 'X' (unchanged). So not selected. Column11: row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 'X' -> X at row3. Output row3 col11 is 'G' selected. Column12: row1 'X'; row2 '.'; row3 '.' -> X at row1. Output row1 col12 is 'X' unchanged. Column13: row1 '.'; row2 'X'; row3 '.' -> X at row2. Output row2 col13 is 'G' selected. Thus selected columns: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13 (odd columns) except column? also column? Let's list selected columns: 1 (row2),3(row1),5(row2),7(row2),9(row3),11(row3),13(row2). That's all odd-numbered ... [4198 chars truncated]
"Seeds planted in a three-row bed, one per furrow-width, in a zigzag pattern. The gardener checks the last seed's position and waters every seed that shares its row-rhythm — those sprout green while the dry ones stay dormant."
120b: k=1
See: Grey seeds dot three rows of soil, one seed per column, zigzagging between rows.
Do: The final seed's placement sets the watering schedule. Seeds on the same cadence drink and sprout green; the others remain grey and dormant.
Grid: Three rows. One X per column on black (.) soil. Some X become green (G).
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3 rows, columns? Let's parse example1. Input rows (I'll index columns). Row1: ". . X . . X . X . . . X ." Let's count: tokens separated by space. Row1: [.,.,X,.,.,X,.,X,.,.,.,X,.] length 13? Let's count: 1 .,2 .,3 X,4 .,5 .,6 X,7 .,8 X,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 X,13 . => 13 columns. Row2: "X . . . X . X . . X . . X" length 13 as well. Row3: ". X . X . . . . X . X . ." length 13. Output rows: Row1: ". . G . . X . X . . . X ." Row2: "G . . . G . G . . X . . G" Row3: ". X . X . . . . G . G . ." So transformation: some X become G (green). Others stay X. Which ones? Let's map positions. Create coordinate (r,c). Mark X in input, see if output G. Row1 col3 X -> output col3 G (changed). Row1 col6 X stays X. Row1 col8 X stays X. Row1 col12 X stays X. So only first X changed. Row2: X at col1 becomes G. col5 X becomes G. col7 X becomes G. col10 X stays X. col13 X becomes G. So many changed. Row3: X at col2 stays X? Wait row3 col2 is X in input, output row3 col2 is X (unchanged). col4 X unchanged. col9 X becomes G. col11 X becomes G. Others none. Pattern: "Grey seeds dot three rows of soil, one seed per column, zigzagging between rows." Means there is exactly one X per column across three rows? Let's check columns: For each column, there is exactly one X in input? Let's verify column wise for example1. Column1: row1 ., row2 X, row3 . => one X (row2) Col2: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X => one X (row3) Col3: row1 X, row2 ., row3 . => one X (row1) Col4: row1 ., row2 ., row3 X? Wait row3 col4 is X yes. So column4 has X in row3 only. So indeed each column has exactly one X (seed) across three rows. Let's verify all columns up to 13. I'll list column values (r1,r2,r3): 1: . X . 2: . . X 3: X . . 4: . . X 5: . X . 6: X . . 7: . X . 8: X . . 9: . . X 10: . X . 11: . . X 12: X . . 13: . X . Yes each column exactly one X. So pattern: seeds (X) placed one per column, zigzagging rows. Now transformation: "The final seed's placement sets the watering schedule. Seeds on the same cadence drink and sprout green; the others remain grey and dormant." Interpretation: There is a "final seed" maybe the last column? The placement (row) of the final seed determines a cadence (maybe a step pattern) and seeds that are on same cadence become green. Maybe we need to find a repeating pattern of rows (like a cycle) based on the final seed's row, and then mark those X that follow that pattern as G. Let's examine example1: final column is column13, X is at row2 (since row2 col13 X). So final seed row = 2 (middle row). The cadence maybe a sequence of rows visited when moving leftwards? Starting from final column moving left, maybe we step up/down? Let's see which X became G: columns where row matches some pattern. List columns with X row and whether G: col1: row2 X -> G (yes) col2: row3 X -> not G (remains X) col3: row1 X -> G col4: row3 X -> not G col5: row2 X -> G col6: row1 X -> not G col7: row2 X -> G ... [7088 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains exactly one 2x2 block of green (G) cells, which serves as a central anchor. Scattered across the grid are individual colored dots (non-green, non-black single cells). Some of these dots share a row or column with one or more cells of the green block; others do not.
Do: For each non-green colored dot in the grid, check whether it lies on the same row or the same column as any cell of the 2x2 green block. If it does, draw a line of that dot's color from the dot toward the nearest edge of the green block, filling every empty (black) cell between the dot and the adjacent edge of the green block. The dot itself and the green block cells remain unchanged. If a dot does not share a row or column with any green block cell, leave it unchanged. All other cells remain as they are.
Grid: The grid is 10x10 with a black (.) background. The 2x2 green block can appear anywhere in the grid. Colored dots are single cells scattered at various positions. The grid uses a 0-indexed coordinate system with row 0 at the top and column 0 at the left.
"The emerald hearth draws travelers home by the roads they already walk."
120b: k=1
See: A glowing emerald hearth (the 2×2 green block) sits in the darkness, while lonely travelers of various colors are scattered across the land. Some travelers happen to stand on a road—a shared row or column—that leads straight to the hearth; others wander paths that never cross it.
Do: Each traveler who finds themselves on a road aligned with the hearth feels its warmth and leaves a trail of their own color behind them as they are pulled toward it—like footprints glowing in the snow. The trail stretches from where the traveler stands all the way to the hearth's doorstep, but the traveler never moves and the hearth is never disturbed. Those who share no road with the hearth remain where they are, unaware of its light.
Grid: The land is a 10×10 expanse of night (black). The emerald hearth is a 2×2 square of green warmth. The travelers are single colored sparks scattered across the darkness, each a different hue marking which road they would illuminate.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with black '.' default. There's a 2x2 green block (G) somewhere. In example1, locate G block: rows 3-4 (0-index? Let's index rows 0-9). Input example1 rows: Row0: ". O . . . . A . . ." Row1: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row2: ". . . O . G G . . A" Row3: ". . . . . G G . . ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". A . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . . . . . . . A ." Row7: ". . . A . . . . . ." Row8: ". O . . . . . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . O . . . O" Green block at (row2,col5),(row2,col6),(row3,col5),(row3,col6). That's 2x2. Now output: see changes. Let's compare. Output rows: Row0 unchanged: ". O . . . . A . . ." Row1: ". . . . . . A . . ." (A added at col6? Actually row1 col6 originally '.' now 'A') Row2: ". . . O O G G A A A" Row3: ". . . . . G G . . ." Row4: ". . . . . O . . . ." Row5: ". A . . . O . . . ." Row6: ". . . . . O . . A ." Row7: ". . . A . O . . . ." Row8: ". O . . . O . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . O . . . . O" Observations: The "travelers" are colored cells other than G and O? Actually there are A (azure) and O (orange) in input. In output, many O's appear forming lines connecting those colored cells to the green block? Let's see. In input, there are A at (0,6), (2,9), (5,1), (6,8), (7,3). O at (0,1), (2,3), (8,1), (9,5), (9,9). Also maybe others. The rule: For each traveler (non-green) that shares a row or column with any cell of the green block, we fill the cells between them (including traveler? maybe not) with that traveler's color, forming a line segment to the nearest green cell? In output, we see O's added along columns/rows aligning with green block. Let's test: Green block rows 2-3, cols5-6. Check traveler A at (0,6). Same column 6 as green block (col6). So line from (0,6) down to green block row2? In output, row1 col6 becomes A (added). Row2 col6 already G (green). So they added A at row1 col6 (the cell between traveler and block). Not at row0 col6 (traveler stays). So rule: fill cells between traveler and block, exclusive of both ends? Actually they fill all cells between traveler and the block, not including traveler (original stays) and not overwriting green. So they added A at row1 col6. Traveler A at (2,9). Same row 2 as green block (row2). Columns 5-6 are green. So line from col9 leftwards to col6? In output row2: after original O at col3? Wait row2 output: ". . . O O G G A A A". Let's map columns 0-9: col0 '.',1'.',2'.',3'O',4'O',5'G',6'G',7'A',8'A',9'A'. Input row2 had O at col3, G at 5,6, A at col9. So they added O at col4 (between O at col3 and green block? Actually O at col3 shares row with green block, so fill between col3 and col5? That would be col4 becomes O. Indeed output col4 O. Also they added A's at col7,8 (between A at col9 and green block at col6). So fill cells between traveler and nearest green cell along row. Traveler A at (5,1). Same column? column1 not aligning with green block columns 5-6, rows 2-3. Not same row or column, so no change. Indeed output ... [8626 chars truncated]
"A green organ pulses at the body's core, and only those cells flowing through its arteries extend their cytoplasm to kiss its membrane."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green organ sits amid scattered single-colored cells on a black field.
Do: Each colored cell whose vascular channel passes through the organ stretches its substance along that channel until it touches the organ wall. Cells on disconnected capillaries remain dormant.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green cluster, scattered single colored cells.
"The green binary star burns at the center of the void. Planets orbiting in its ecliptic planes blaze tidal tails of their own light inward toward the nearest stellar limb."
120b: k=1
See: A 2x2 green star among scattered colored planets on a black void.
Do: Planets sharing an ecliptic plane with the star stream luminous tails of their color toward the star's nearest edge. Off-plane wanderers drift cold.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output given. Let's analyze. We have 10x10 grid. Colors: O orange, A azure, G green. There's a 2x2 green block at positions? In input example1, locate G G pattern: row3 col6-7? Let's index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1 rows: 0: . O . . . . A . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . O . G G . . A 3: . . . . . G G . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: . A . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . A . 7: . . . A . . . . . . 8: . O . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . O . . . O Output example1 rows: 0: . O . . . . A . . . 1: . . . . . . A . . . 2: . . . O O G G A A A 3: . . . . . G G . . . 4: . . . . . O . . . . 5: . A . . . O . . . . 6: . . . . . O . . A . 7: . . . A . O . . . . 8: . O . . . O . . . . 9: . . . . . O . . . O We need to see transformation: seems that colored cells (non-green) are moving towards the green block? The description: "Planets sharing an ecliptic plane with the star stream luminous tails of their color toward the star's nearest edge. Off-plane wanderers drift cold." So star is 2x2 green block. Planets (colored single cells) that are aligned (same row or column?) with the star will stream tails toward nearest edge of star, i.e., fill cells between planet and star with its color? In output, we see new O's added along lines towards green block. Let's examine: In input, there is O at (0,1). In output, O remains at (0,1). Also new O's appear at (1,6?) Wait check. Input O positions: (0,1), (2,3), (5,1), (8,1), (9,5), (9,9). Also maybe others? Let's list. Row0 col1 O. Row2 col3 O. Row5 col1 A (not O) Row8 col1 O. Row9 col5 O. Row9 col9 O. Also maybe O at row? That's all. Output O positions: many more. Let's list O in output: Row0 col1 O (same) Row1 col6 O? Actually row1 col6 is A? Wait row1: ". . . . . . A . . ." So col6 is A, not O. O at row1? none. Row2: col3 O, col4 O (new), also maybe others later. Row4: col5 O (new) Row5: col5 O (new) Row6: col5 O (new) Row7: col5 O (new) Row8: col5 O (new) Row9: col5 O (same) So O's have formed a vertical line at column5 (0-index?) Actually column5 (since row0 col5 is '.' originally). In output O at rows2-9 col5, plus original O at row0 col1 and row2 col3 and row8 col1 and row9 col9 remain? Wait row9 col9 O remains unchanged. Row8 col1 O remains. Row2 col3 O remains. So O's have extended downwards from row2 col5? Let's see original O at (2,3) is left of green block? Green block occupies rows2-3 cols5-6? Actually green block positions: (2,5),(2,6),(3,5),(3,6). Yes. Now O at (2,3) is same row as green block (row2) and left of it. So "stream luminous tails toward the star's nearest edge": nearest edge horizontally is column5 (left edge of block). So O should fill cells between its column3 and column5? That would be columns4 and5? Indeed output has O at (2,4) and (2,5) (col5 is part of block? Actually block at col5 is G, not O. Wait output at (2,5) is G? Let's check row2 output: ". . . O O G G A A A". So col0 .,1 .,2 .,3 O,4 O,5 G,6 G,7 A,8 A,9 A. So O at c ... [9114 chars truncated]
"The green reef breaks the open water. Ships sailing on a bearing that crosses the reef trail their wake in colored foam until the hull grazes coral."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green reef amid scattered colored ships on dark water.
Do: Ships whose heading intersects the reef leave a colored wake stretching from their position to the reef's nearest edge. Ships on clear headings leave no trace.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
"The green chip sits on the board. Only components wired along its bus lines send current of their own color racing through the traces until it reaches the chip's nearest pin."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green chip with colored components scattered on a dark circuit board.
Do: Components sharing a bus line with the chip energize the trace between them and the chip's nearest pin with their signal color. Unconnected components stay inert.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
"The green altar awaits offerings. Pilgrims walking the sacred axes lay down petals of their soul-color along the processional path until they reach the altar's threshold."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green altar surrounded by scattered colored pilgrims on dark ground.
Do: Pilgrims aligned with the altar's sacred axes scatter their color along the path between themselves and the altar's nearest edge. Off-axis wanderers pass unseen.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
"The green dais holds the rhythm. Dancers standing in its grooves glissade toward the platform, leaving ribbons of their costume color across the dark floor until toe meets stage-edge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green dais with colored dancers scattered across a dark ballroom floor.
Do: Dancers in the dais's grooves glide toward it, painting the floor in their color from where they stand to the platform's nearest edge. Dancers off the grooves hold still.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
"The green magma chamber sits beneath the surface. Mineral veins running through its fault lines bleed their ore-color through the rock until they breach the chamber wall."
120b: k=2
See: A 2x2 green magma chamber with colored mineral dots scattered in dark rock.
Do: Minerals sharing a fault line with the chamber seep their color through empty rock toward the chamber's nearest wall. Off-fault minerals stay locked in stone.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
We need to infer rule. From description: 2x2 green magma chamber (green block) with colored mineral dots scattered in dark rock. Minerals sharing a fault line with the chamber seep their color through empty rock toward the chamber's nearest wall. Off-fault minerals stay locked in stone. Interpretation: Input grid has a 2x2 green block (G G in a square). There are other colored single cells (like O, A, etc.) that are "minerals". If a mineral is aligned (same row or column) with the green block (i.e., shares a "fault line") and there is empty rock (black .) between them, then the mineral's color propagates (fills) along that line towards the nearest wall of the green block? Let's examine example 1. Example1 Input grid 10x10. Let's locate green block: rows 3-4 (0-index? Let's index from 0). Input lines: Row0: . O . . . . A . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . O . G G . . A Row3: . . . . . G G . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . A . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . A . Row7: . . . A . . . . . . Row8: . O . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . O . . . O Green block at rows2-3, cols5-6 (0-index). Indeed 2x2. Now output: Let's compare. Output rows: Row0 unchanged: . O . . . . A . . . Row1: . . . . . . A . . . (A appears at col6? Actually row1 col6 = A). In input row1 all . . So A moved? Which mineral? There is an A at row0 col6 originally? Actually input row0 col6 = A (since row0: . O . . . . A . . .). That's at (0,6). In output row1 col6 = A, moved down one? Let's see. Row2 output: . . . O O G G A A A Row2 input: . . . O . G G . . A So O at (2,3) stays? Actually O at (2,3) same. Additional O at (2,4) appears (new). G G unchanged. A's: originally A at (2,9). Output has A at (2,7),(2,8),(2,9) three As. Also A at (2,6) maybe? Actually output row2 col6 = G, col7 = A, col8 = A, col9 = A. So A extended leftwards? Wait original A at (0,6) and (5,1) and (6,8) and (7,3) and (9,5) and (9,9). Many As. Let's analyze propagation rule: Minerals sharing a fault line with the chamber (green block) seep their color through empty rock toward the chamber's nearest wall. So for each mineral that is aligned with the green block (same row or column) and there is a clear path of empty cells (.) between them, the mineral's color will fill the cells along that line up to the nearest wall of the green block (i.e., the edge of the 2x2 block). The mineral may also fill beyond? Let's test. Consider mineral O at (0,1). Is it aligned with green block? Green block columns 5-6, rows2-3. O at (0,1) same column? No. Same row? Row0 vs rows2-3 no. So not aligned, stays unchanged. Indeed output row0 col1 O unchanged. Mineral O at (2,3) is same row as green block row2. Column 3 left of block. Path: cells (2,4) is '.' (empty) then (2,5) is G (block). So O shares row with block, and there is empty rock between O and block. According to rule, O's color should seep toward the block's nearest wall (which is column5? Actually block occupies columns5-6, nearest wall from left sid ... [9686 chars truncated]
"The green pat of butter melts nothing on its own, but ingredients resting in its pan-lines weep their juices toward it until they kiss the sizzle."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green square sits among scattered colored dots on a dark surface.
Do: Ingredients aligned in the butter's griddle-channels leak a trail of their own color toward the nearest edge of the butter. Those off the griddle-lines stay dry.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, various single colored dots.
"The green chord resonates at center stage, and only those notes tuned to its frequency sustain their tone along the staff line until they reach the chord's edge."
120b: k=1
See: A 2x2 green chord anchors the score; single colored notes are scattered across the staves.
Do: Notes sharing a staff line or ledger line with the chord ring out, filling silence between themselves and the chord with their pitch-color. Off-key notes remain silent.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10. There's a 2x2 green block (G G in two rows, columns?). In example 1 input: Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-9, cols 0-9. Input example1 rows: 0: . O . . . . A . . . 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . O . G G . . A 3: . . . . . G G . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: . A . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . A . 7: . . . A . . . . . . 8: . O . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . O . . . O Output example1 rows: 0: . O . . . . A . . . 1: . . . . . . A . . . 2: . . . O O G G A A A 3: . . . . . G G . . . 4: . . . . . O . . . . 5: . A . . . O . . . . 6: . . . . . O . . A . 7: . . . A . O . . . . 8: . O . . . O . . . . 9: . . . . . O . . . O We need to see transformation: The 2x2 green block at rows2-3 cols5-6 (0-index). That's the chord anchor. The rule: "Notes sharing a staff line or ledger line with the chord ring out, filling silence between themselves and the chord with their pitch-color. Off-key notes remain silent." Interpretation: For each colored single cell (non-green) that is aligned horizontally or vertically (maybe same row or column) with the green block, we fill the cells between that note and the green block with that note's color. The note itself maybe stays? In output, we see new colors added. Let's examine: In input, there is O at (0,1). Is it aligned with green block? Same column? Green block columns 5,6. O column 1 not same. Same row? Row0 not same as green rows 2,3. So not aligned. In output, O remains unchanged at (0,1). No new O added. There is A at (0,6). That's same column as green block (col6). Row0 above green rows. In output, at (1,6) becomes A (was .). Indeed row1 col6 now A. Also row2 col6 already G (part of block). Row2 col5 G. Row2 col7? In output row2 col7 becomes A (was .). Row2 col8 A (was .). Row2 col9 A (was A originally at col9). So the A at (0,6) extended downwards to fill cells between it and the green block? The green block top row is row2. So cells between row0 and row2 exclusive are row1. At (1,6) we placed A. Also after the block? The description says "filling silence between themselves and the chord". So between note and chord, not beyond. So only row1 col6 filled. Indeed. Also note at (2,9) A is to the right of block same row2. Between col7-8 are empty; they become A in output (col7,8). Indeed. Note at (5,1) A same column as block? column1 vs 5/6 no. Same row? row5 vs block rows2-3 no. Not aligned, stays. Note at (6,8) A same row? row6 vs block rows2-3 no. Same column? col8 vs 5/6 no. So unchanged. Note at (7,3) A same column? col3 vs 5/6 no. Same row? row7 vs block rows2-3 no. unchanged. Note at (8,1) O same column? col1 vs 5/6 no. same row? row8 vs block rows2-3 no. unchanged. Note at (9,5) O same column as block col5. Row9 below block rows3. Between row4-8? Actually block bottom row is 3. So rows4-8 col5 become O in output: check output rows4-8 col5: row4 col5 O, row5 col5 O, row6 col5 O, row7 col5 O, row8 col5 O. Yes. Row9 col5 already O stays. Als ... [6430 chars truncated]
"The green goal sits on the pitch, and only strikers with a clear lane charge straight toward the nearest post, leaving cleat marks in their color all the way."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green goal and scattered colored players on a dark pitch.
Do: Players with an unobstructed lane to the goal sprint toward the nearest goalpost, stamping their color along the path. Players without a lane hold position.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered single colored cells.
"The green pressure system sits still while winds carrying colored rain stream toward it along the cardinal corridors, staining the sky from cloud to eye-wall."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green eye amid scattered colored rain-dots on a dark sky.
Do: Each rain-dot caught in a cardinal corridor with the eye sends a colored streak along that corridor until it meets the eye-wall. Off-corridor dots drift harmlessly.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, various single colored dots.
"The green cornerstone anchors the cathedral; only those gargoyles perched along its load-bearing axes weep colored streaks down toward the foundation."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green cornerstone with colored gargoyle-dots scattered across a dark facade.
Do: Gargoyles aligned with the cornerstone's structural axes stain the wall between themselves and the cornerstone with their own hue. Others remain dry.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered single colored cells.
"The green fortress holds the field. Scouts that can see its walls along a siege-line advance, planting their banners in every empty square until they reach the ramparts."
120b: k=3
See: A 2x2 green fortress surrounded by scattered colored scouts on dark terrain.
Do: Scouts with line-of-sight to the fortress march forward along that line, coloring each empty cell until they reach the fortress wall. Scouts behind cover stay put.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
We need to infer rule. From description: 2x2 green fortress (block of G). Scouts are colored cells scattered. They have line-of-sight to fortress; they march forward along that line, coloring each empty cell until they reach fortress wall. Scouts behind cover stay put. Interpretation: For each colored cell (non-green) that is aligned horizontally, vertically, or maybe diagonally with the green 2x2 block, and there are no other colored cells blocking? They move towards the block, filling cells along the line until adjacent to block? In examples, see. Example1: Input grid 10x10. Green block at rows 2-3? Let's map coordinates (0-index). Input lines: Row0: . O . . . . A . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . O . G G . . A Row3: . . . . . G G . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . A . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . A . Row7: . . . A . . . . . . Row8: . O . . . . . . . . Row9: . . . . . O . . . O Output changes: many O's added along lines towards green block? Let's see. Green block at (2,5),(2,6),(3,5),(3,6). In output, O's appear at positions: row0 col1 unchanged O. Row1 col6 becomes A? Wait output row1: ". . . . . . A . . ." So A moved? Input had A at (0,6) and (2,9) and (5,1) and (6,8) and (7,3). Output shows A at (0,6) unchanged, also new A's at (1,6), (2,8?), (2,9) unchanged? Let's compare. Input row2: ". . . O . G G . . A" Output row2: ". . . O O G G A A A" So O at (2,4) originally '.' becomes O? Actually output row2 col4 is O (since positions: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 O,4 O,5 G,6 G,7 A,8 A,9 A). Input had O at col3, '.' at col4, G G at 5,6, '.' at 7, '.' at8, A at9. Output added O at col4, A at col7,8,9? Actually A at col7,8,9 (three As). Input had A only at col9. So A extended leftwards? Let's see line-of-sight: A at (0,6) above green block column 5-6? Actually A at (0,6) is same column as green block column6. So line vertical downwards: cells (1,6) empty, (2,6) G (block). So A should march downwards until reaching block wall? It would fill (1,6) with A. Indeed output row1 col6 is A. Good. Also A at (5,1) left side? Not aligned with block. A at (6,8) maybe diagonal? Not. A at (7,3) maybe diagonal? Not. But output shows new A's at (2,7) and (2,8) also? Actually (2,7) originally '.' becomes A. That's to the right of block? The block occupies columns5-6. Right side column7 is adjacent to block. There is A at (0,6) above block, but also maybe A at (5,1) left side? Not. Maybe rule: For each colored cell, extend its color in its direction towards the nearest green cell (if any) until hitting green block, filling empty cells. The direction is determined by the vector from the scout to the nearest green cell? For A at (0,6), nearest green is (2,5) or (2,6). Direction downwards (south). So fill cells (1,6) with A until just before green? Actually they fill up to adjacent? They filled (1,6) but not (2,6) because it's green. Good. Now O's: Input O at (0,1), (2,3), (8,1), (9,5), (9,9). Output O's added at (1,5?) Let's see output row1 col5? Row1: ... [9948 chars truncated]
"The green spotlight marks center stage. Actors standing in its beam walk their soliloquy toward the light, trailing costume-colored ribbons behind them through the dark."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green spotlight and scattered colored actors on a dark stage.
Do: Actors caught in the spotlight's cross-beams trail their color toward the light's nearest edge. Those in the wings stay in shadow.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered single colored cells.
"The green hedge sits at the garden's heart. Flowers planted along its trellised rows send creeping vines of their own color until tendrils brush the hedge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 2x2 green hedge with colored flower-dots scattered across dark soil.
Do: Flowers sharing a trellis row or column with the hedge extend vines of their color through empty soil toward the hedge's nearest edge. Untethered flowers stay rooted.
Grid: 10x10, black background, one 2x2 green block, scattered colored single cells.
See: A 5x5 grid containing scattered cells of a single non-black color (blue, red, or green) against a black (.) background. The specific spatial arrangement of the colored cells varies but is irrelevant to the transformation. The only thing that matters is which color is present.
Do: Identify which color appears in the input grid. Produce a 3x3 output grid based solely on the color identity: (1) If the color is blue (B), output a plus/cross shape: row 1 = . X ., row 2 = X X X, row 3 = . X . (2) If the color is red (R), output an inverted-T shape: row 1 = X X X, row 2 = . X ., row 3 = . X . (3) If the color is green (G), output a bottom-right L shape: row 1 = . . X, row 2 = . . X, row 3 = X X X. Each output shape contains exactly 5 grey (X) cells and 4 black (.) cells.
Grid: Input: a 5x5 grid with cells that are either black (.) or one of three possible colors (blue B, red R, or green G). Only one non-black color appears per grid. Output: a 3x3 grid using grey (X) for the pattern and black (.) for background.
"Every tribe has a sacred sigil, and scattering the warriors across the battlefield doesn't change the banner they march under."
120b: k=3
See: A battlefield (5×5) is strewn with warriors of a single tribe — blue, red, or green — scattered among empty darkness. Their positions are chaotic, as if flung by a storm, but every warrior wears the same color, and that color is the name of their tribe.
Do: Ignore where the warriors fell — their arrangement is a feint. Instead, read the color of their armor to learn which tribe has taken the field. Each tribe carries an ancestral sigil, a compact grey emblem stamped onto a 3×3 seal. The blue tribe's sigil radiates outward from the center in four directions. The red tribe's sigil stands tall, crowned with a broad brim. The green tribe's sigil hunkers into one corner, bracing two walls that meet at the foundation. Summon the correct sigil and the battle resolves.
Grid: The battlefield is a 5×5 expanse of darkness dotted with a single tribe's colored warriors. The ancestral seal is a 3×3 tablet where the sigil is rendered in grey (X) against black emptiness — always five stones placed, four spaces left bare.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with only one color (B,R,G) plus . (black). Output is 3x3 with X's forming a pattern based on tribe. We have three patterns described metaphorically: - Blue tribe's sigil radiates outward from the center in four directions. That suggests a plus shape: center plus up/down/left/right. That's 5 cells (center + 4). In output example 1 (blue), output grid: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape indeed. So blue => plus. - Red tribe's sigil stands tall, crowned with a broad brim. That suggests maybe a T shape? "stands tall" vertical line, "crowned with a broad brim" horizontal line at top. That's a T shape (5 cells). Output example 2 (red): X X X . X . . X . That's a T shape (top row three X, middle column down). Yes. - Green tribe's sigil hunkers into one corner, bracing two walls that meet at the foundation. That suggests an L shape (corner). Output example 3 (green): . . X . . X X X X That's an L shape rotated? Let's see: bottom row full three X, rightmost column top two X, forming an L shape with corner at bottom right? Actually shape: cells (row3,col1-3) all X, plus (row1,col3) and (row2,col3). That's like a reversed L (like a corner with vertical line on right side and horizontal line at bottom). That's an L shape (5 cells). So green => L shape (corner) with the corner at bottom right? But orientation may be determined by something else? In example, green pattern appears oriented with corner at bottom left? Wait coordinates: 3x3 grid rows 1-3, columns 1-3. Output: Row1: . . X (col3) Row2: . . X (col3) Row3: X X X (row3 all) So shape is like an L rotated 90 degrees clockwise? Actually typical L shape (like corner) could be vertical line on left and horizontal bottom. Here vertical line on right, horizontal bottom. So corner at bottom right? The corner cell is bottom right (row3,col3) which is part of both lines. So orientation is bottom right corner. Thus green => L shape anchored at bottom right. Now we need to determine which tribe is present in test input. Input grid includes G and . only? Let's see test input: Row1: . G . G G Row2: . . G . . Row3: G . . . . Row4: . . G . G Row5: . . . . G Only G present, no B or R. So tribe is green. So output should be the green sigil: L shape anchored at bottom right (as per example). However maybe orientation could depend on something else like distribution of G's? But description says ignore arrangement, just color determines pattern. So output is fixed L shape. Thus output 3x3 grid with X's as described. Let's verify pattern: Example 3 matches L shape bottom right. So we output same. Thus answer grid: Row1: . . X Row2: . . X Row3: X X X Using '.' for black, 'X' for grey. Provide as block with spaces.
"Cells of a single species colonize the petri dish in unpredictable clusters, but every species folds into the same genus-specific protein regardless of where the colonies took root."
120b: k=3
See: A culture dish with scattered colonies of one microbial species staining the medium a characteristic hue.
Do: Ignore the colony placement entirely. Identify the species by its color and express its signature protein — a compact molecular shape unique to that lineage.
Grid: Input: 5x5 dish with one colored species scattered among empty medium. Output: 3x3 protein structure in grey on black, determined solely by species identity.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with colored cells (single color among B,R,G etc) and empty '.' black. Output 3x3 with X (grey) and '.' black. The rule depends only on species identity (color) not placement. So output pattern is determined by which color appears in input (the species). For each example, color is B, R, G respectively. Output patterns differ. We need to map color to a 3x3 pattern of X and . . Let's list. Example1: color B (blue). Input has many B scattered. Output: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center X and arms up/down/left/right, corners . . So pattern is a plus. Example2: color R (red). Output: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted T? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like a vertical line with top horizontal bar. So shape maybe "T" pointing up? Actually T shape: top row full, middle column full. That's exactly a T (upwards). So pattern is T shape. Example3: color G (green). Output: . . X . . X X X X That's like rotated T pointing right? Let's see: rightmost column full X, bottom row full X. That's a T rotated 90° clockwise (pointing right). So pattern is T shape rotated right. Thus mapping: B -> plus shape (cross). R -> T up. G -> T right. We need to infer mapping for other colors maybe based on orientation? Maybe each color corresponds to a specific orientation of T or plus? Let's think: maybe the shape corresponds to the first letter of color? B -> plus (maybe looks like a "B" shape? Not). R -> T up (maybe R looks like a "R" shape? Not). G -> T right (maybe G looks like a rotated T? Not). Could be based on alphabetical order? B (2) -> plus (maybe 2 lines intersect). R (18) -> T up (maybe 18 looks like T?). G (7) -> T right (maybe 7 looks like rotated T?). Not clear. Maybe rule: The output shape is the convex hull of the colored cells? But they said ignore placement entirely. So shape determined solely by color identity. Thus we need to know mapping for G (green) already given: T right. Test input also uses G. So output should be same as example3? Probably yes. The test input is also green species, so output same pattern: T right. Thus output grid 3x3 with X's as in example3. Let's write that: Row1: . . X Row2: . . X Row3: X X X Using '.' for black, 'X' for grey. Thus answer. Check if any nuance: maybe orientation depends on distribution of that color in input (like shape of cluster). But they said ignore placement entirely. So consistent. Thus final answer.
"Stars of a single spectral class flicker across the observation plate, but the astronomer doesn't care about the constellation — she cares about the class, because each spectral type always collapses into the same remnant silhouette."
120b: k=3
See: Stars of one spectral color scattered across a dark sky plate.
Do: Classify the spectral type by color and predict the stellar remnant — a small fixed shape that spectral class alone determines.
Grid: Input: 5x5 sky with one star color. Output: 3x3 remnant silhouette in grey, per spectral class.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one star color (blue, red, green). Output 3x3 grey shape (X) pattern depends on spectral class (color). So each color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern. We have three examples: blue input yields output pattern: Example1 output: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. Red input yields output: X X X . X . . X . That's like a shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. So like a T rotated? Actually looks like a vertical line with top bar: a T shape pointing down? T shape with stem downwards. Green input yields output: . . X . . X X X X That's like rotated T pointing up? Actually bottom row full, rightmost column full. That's like an L rotated? Let's see: shape is like a reversed L? Coordinates: (row0,col2), (row1,col2), (row2,0),(2,1),(2,2). That's like a shape of a "Γ" rotated 180? Actually it's like a T pointing up? No T pointing up would have top row full, center column. This is bottom row full and right column full. That's like a rotated T 90 degrees clockwise? Let's compare: Red output had top row full, middle column? No red output: row0: X X X (full top), row1: . X . (center), row2: . X . (center). That's a T pointing down (stem down). Green output: bottom row full, right column full (stem up?). That's like a T pointing left? Wait T pointing left would have left column full and middle row full. Not this. Actually shape is like an L shape with extra bottom row full? Let's think: shape consists of bottom row full (3 cells) and rightmost column full (3 cells) overlapping at bottom-right corner counted twice. That's like a "┘" shape (corner). Blue output is plus shape. Thus mapping: Blue -> plus, Red -> T-down, Green -> corner bottom+right. Now test input is green color (G). So output should be same pattern as green example: bottom row full, right column full. Thus output 3x3 grid with X at positions: (2,0),(2,1),(2,2) bottom row; (0,2),(1,2),(2,2) right column. So grid: Row0: . . X Row1: . . X Row2: X X X Same as example 3 output. So answer identical. Thus output grid: . . X . . X X X X We must use spaces between characters. Provide final block.
"Flotsam of one cargo type bobs across the dark water in no discernible pattern, but the harbormaster knows: cotton drifts into one mooring shape, silk another, spice a third — the cargo declares its own berth."
120b: k=3
See: Floating debris of one color scattered across dark ocean.
Do: Identify the cargo type by its color and assign the mooring configuration — each cargo has one berth pattern, regardless of where the flotsam drifts.
Grid: Input: 5x5 ocean with one cargo color. Output: 3x3 mooring pattern in grey, fixed per cargo.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one cargo color (blue, red, green). Output 3x3 pattern of grey X. The pattern seems to be based on shape of that color in input? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input color B (blue). Let's map positions of B in 5x5. Represent coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) So many B's. Output 3x3: . X . X X X . X . Positions of X: (0,1),(1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1). That's a plus shape (cross) with center at (1,1). So pattern is a plus. Example2: Input color R. Let's list R positions. Row0: R . R . R => (0,0),(0,2),(0,4) Row1: R . . . R => (1,0),(1,4) Row2: R R . . . => (2,0),(2,1) Row3: R . . R R => (3,0),(3,3),(3,4) Row4: R R R . R => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4) Output: X X X . X . . X . Positions: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like an L rotated? Actually shape: top row full three X, then a vertical line down from middle column (col1) rows1-2. So like a T? Wait T would be top row full, middle column down. That's exactly a T shape (upside-down? Actually T shape with stem down). So pattern is a T. Example3: Input color G. Positions: Row0: . G . G . => (0,1),(0,3) Row1: G G . . . => (1,0),(1,1) Row2: . G . . . => (2,1) Row3: . . G . . => (3,2) Row4: G G G . . => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2) Output: . . X . . X X X X Positions: (0,2),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2). That's like an upside-down T? Actually top two rows have X only at rightmost column (col2). Bottom row full three X. That's a T rotated 180 degrees (stem up). So pattern is inverted T. So mapping: each cargo color corresponds to a specific 3x3 pattern (berth). Blue => plus, Red => T (pointing up), Green => inverted T (pointing down). Need to deduce mapping maybe based on color semantics? Not needed; we just need for test input which is green G again. So output should be same pattern as example3 (since same cargo color). Let's verify if any variation due to orientation? Example3 green pattern is inverted T (stem up). So for test input green, output should be same. Thus output grid 3x3 with X's as described: rows: Row0: . . X Row1: . . X Row2: X X X Check orientation: In example3, they used . . X (col2) top rows, bottom row full. So we output same. Thus answer grid: . . X . . X X X X Make sure spaces between characters.
"Charge carriers are scattered randomly across the semiconductor, but the dopant type determines the junction geometry — each impurity, no matter how it diffuses, always produces the same circuit signature on the output pin."
120b: k=4
See: One type of dopant carrier scattered across a dark silicon substrate.
Do: Identify the dopant by its color and read off the junction geometry — a fixed output pattern intrinsic to that impurity type.
Grid: Input: 5x5 substrate with one dopant color. Output: 3x3 junction pattern in grey, per dopant type.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one dopant color (i.e., one non-black color appears). Output 3x3 pattern of X (grey) and . (black) depending on dopant type. We have examples mapping each dopant color to a specific 3x3 pattern. Let's list. Example1: Input contains B (blue) as dopant. Output pattern: . X . X X X . X . So pattern is a plus shape (cross) with center and arms? Actually plus shape with center X and up/down/left/right X, but also corners? The pattern shows X at (0,1), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1). That's a plus shape (center plus up/down/left/right). So for B, output is plus. Example2: Input dopant R (red). Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: top row all X, middle column X (center and below). So shape like an inverted L? Actually coordinates: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like a T rotated 90? It's like a T pointing down? Wait typical T shape is top row full, middle column below center. That's exactly shape: a T with stem downwards. So for R, output is T shape. Example3: Input dopant G (green). Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: bottom row full X, rightmost column X (top two rows). That's like an L shape rotated 90? Actually it's a rotated T? It's like a reversed L (vertical line on right, horizontal line at bottom). So shape like a gamma. Example4: Input dopant B again? Wait example4 input includes B as dopant but also other colors? Input grid: there are B's only (blue) and . (black). So same as example1? Output same plus shape. Indeed output matches plus shape. Thus mapping: Blue -> plus shape (center + up/down/left/right) Red -> T shape (top row full, middle column down) Green -> L shape (right column full, bottom row full) We need to see if other colors exist maybe Y, etc but not needed. Now test input: contains G (green) as dopant (maybe also other colors? Let's see grid: Row0: . G . G G Row1: . . G . . Row2: G . . . . Row3: . . G . G Row4: . . . . G Only G appears (green). So same as green mapping: output should be the L shape pattern as in example3. Thus output 3x3 grid: Row0: . . X Row1: . . X Row2: X X X Check orientation: In example3, green pattern is that. So answer same. Thus produce output grid with '.' and 'X'. Answer block.
"The oracle's bones land differently every cast, but the god who stained them has already chosen the omen — each deity's dye reveals one and only one sacred glyph, and the throw pattern is mere theater."
120b: k=3
See: Oracle bones tinted in one deity's sacred color, scattered across a dark cloth.
Do: Read the dye color to identify the deity and inscribe the sacred glyph — each god commands one eternal symbol, indifferent to how the bones fell.
Grid: Input: 5x5 casting cloth with one sacred color. Output: 3x3 divine glyph in grey, fixed per deity.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one sacred color (the colored cells are a single non-black color: B, R, G). Output is 3x3 pattern of X (grey) and . (black). The pattern depends on which color appears (deity). So each color maps to a fixed 3x3 glyph. We have three examples: color B (blue) yields output pattern: . X . X X X . X . That's like a plus sign with center and arms, but missing top middle? Actually pattern: row1: . X . (center top) row2: X X X (full row) row3: . X . (center bottom). That's a cross shape (plus). So B => plus. R (red) yields: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted L? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like a T rotated? Let's visualize: a vertical line down middle, plus top row full. That's like a "T" shape (top bar across, vertical stem down middle). So R => T. G (green) yields: . . X . . X X X X That's like rotated T opposite: vertical line on right side, bottom row full. That's like a "Γ" shape (mirror of T). So G => rotated T (right side vertical). So each color corresponds to a specific orientation of T shape. Thus rule: Identify the unique non-black color in input (the "sacred color"). Output a 3x3 glyph corresponding to that color: B => plus, R => T (top bar), G => reversed T (right side). Possibly other colors would map to other glyphs. Now we need to apply to test input: Input grid includes G (green) as the only colored cells? Let's check: test input grid 5x5: Row1: . G . G G Row2: . . G . . Row3: G . . . . Row4: . . G . G Row5: . . . . G Only G appears (green). So deity = green => output pattern same as example 3 (green). That pattern is: . . X . . X X X X Check orientation: In example 3 output exactly that. So answer should be that same 3x3 grid. Thus output: . . X . . X X X X We must use color codes: . for black, X for grey. Provide as rows with spaces. Answer block.
"Dancers wander the darkened stage during the overture, but when the spotlight hits, each company snaps into its signature lift — the choreography is written in the color of their shoes, not in their wandering."
120b: k=3
See: Dancers in one color of slippers scattered across a dark stage.
Do: Identify the company by slipper color and call the signature lift — a compact formation each company always performs, regardless of starting positions.
Grid: Input: 5x5 stage with one slipper color. Output: 3x3 lift formation in grey, unique per company.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one color (non-black) scattered. Output 3x3 pattern of X (grey) forming a compact formation (like a shape) unique per company (color). So each color corresponds to a specific 3x3 pattern of X and . (black). Need to map from examples. Example1: color B (blue). Input 5x5 with B positions. Output 3x3: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. So pattern for blue is plus. Example2: color R (red). Output: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted L? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. So a vertical line of three with top row full. That's like a T rotated? Let's visualize coordinates (row,col) 0-index in 3x3: (0,0) X, (0,1) X, (0,2) X (1,0) ., (1,1) X, (1,2) . (2,0) ., (2,1) X, (2,2) . So shape is a column at col1 rows0-2 plus extra X at (0,0) and (0,2). So like a T shape with stem downwards, top bar full. Example3: color G (green). Output: . . X . . X X X X That's like rotated version of red? Actually it's like a mirrored L: bottom row full, rightmost column full. So shape: bottom row all X, right column rows0-2 X. That's like a rotated version of red shape (90 deg clockwise). Indeed red shape had top row full and middle column full. Green shape has right column full and bottom row full. So orientation depends on something about input arrangement maybe direction of something. Thus rule: Identify orientation based on distribution of colored cells in input. For each color, there is a base shape (maybe plus for blue, L/T for red/green). The orientation (rotation) is determined by the "center of mass" or bounding box of colored cells? Let's analyze. Example2 red input: Let's map red positions. Input 5x5: Row0: R . R . R => positions (0,0),(0,2),(0,4) Row1: R . . . R => (1,0),(1,4) Row2: R R . . . => (2,0),(2,1) Row3: R . . R R => (3,0),(3,3),(3,4) Row4: R R R . R => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4) So many reds. Determine maybe the "missing" direction? The shape output is top row full, column center. That suggests orientation pointing up? Maybe the empty corner is bottom left? Not sure. Example3 green input: Rows: 0: . G . G . => (0,1),(0,3) 1: G G . . . => (1,0),(1,1) 2: . G . . . => (2,1) 3: . . G . . => (3,2) 4: G G G . . => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2) Output orientation: bottom row full, right column full (i.e., shape pointing down-right). So maybe orientation corresponds to direction of "majority" of colored cells? Let's compute bounding box of green cells: min row 0, max row 4, min col 0, max col 3? Actually max col 3 (since (0,3)). So rectangle 5x4. Center maybe? Not. Maybe they compute the "missing" corner of the 5x5 where there are no colored cells? For green, which corner is empty? Let's see corners: (0,0) empty, (0,4) empty, (4,0) has G, (4,4) empty. So three corners empty, one corner (4,0) filled. Output orientation bottom row full and right column full corresponds to missing top-left? Not. ... [6843 chars truncated]
"Mineral deposits surface in random veins, but the assayer needs only the color of the ore to know its crystal habit — each mineral, no matter how its veins run, always cleaves into the same lattice."
120b: k=3
See: One mineral's colored deposits scattered through dark rock.
Do: Identify the mineral by ore color and predict its crystal habit — a compact lattice unique to that mineral, independent of vein placement.
Grid: Input: 5x5 rock face with one ore color. Output: 3x3 crystal lattice in grey, fixed per mineral.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one ore color (blue, red, green). Output 3x3 grey X pattern representing crystal habit. Need to deduce mapping from examples. Let's analyze Example1: Input has B (blue) cells scattered. Output 3x3 pattern: . X . X X X . X . So shape is a plus sign (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. That's a plus shape. Example2: Input red cells. Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: a shape like a T? Actually grid: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . That's a vertical line of three with top row full three. That's like a T rotated 180? Actually shape looks like a "T" with stem downwards: top row full, middle column continues down two more. So shape is a T pointing down. Example3: Input green cells. Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: rotated T pointing up? Let's see: bottom row full three, rightmost column has three (top to bottom). That's like an L rotated? Actually shape: bottom row full, right column full, overlapping at bottom-right corner. That's like a reversed L shape (like a corner). But compare to Example2: top row full, middle column full. That's a T shape. Example3: bottom row full, right column full. That's like a rotated T? Wait T shape would have a full row and a column intersecting at middle of that row. In Example2, full row is top row, column is middle column intersecting at top middle? Actually column passes through middle of top row (center). In Example2, top row X X X, column at column 2 (0-index 1) has X at rows 0,1,2. So intersection at (0,1) which is top middle. That's a T pointing down. In Example3, full row is bottom row (row2), column is rightmost column (col2). Intersection at (2,2) bottom right corner. That's like an L shape (corner). Not a T. Maybe the shape corresponds to convex hull of ore cells? Let's compute positions. Example1 B positions (5x5). Let's list coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input1: Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) So many B's. The output shape is plus. Maybe the shape is the pattern of the most frequent relative arrangement? Or maybe we need to find the "mineral" which is the color, and each mineral has a fixed crystal habit: blue => plus, red => T, green => L (or rotated). So rule: map color to a specific 3x3 pattern. Thus we just need to map green to pattern from Example3. Example3 output is: . . X . . X X X X So for test input, which also uses green as ore color, output should be same pattern (maybe orientation depends on something else like orientation of cluster). But test input may have different orientation? Let's see if orientation changes based on distribution of ore cells (maybe direction of "vein" influences rotation). In Example2 red output T pointing down. In Example3 green output L (or rotated T?). Could be that orientation is determined by the "center of mass" of ore cells rel ... [1668 chars truncated]
"No matter how you scatter the spice across the cutting board, when it hits the heat, it always crystallizes into the same garnish pattern — cumin curls one way, paprika another, dried basil a third."
120b: k=3
See: A single spice sprinkled haphazardly across a dark surface.
Do: Identify which spice was used and plate its signature garnish — each spice has exactly one crystallization pattern it always forms.
Grid: Input: 5x5 dark board with one colored spice scattered randomly. Output: 3x3 plated garnish in grey, shape determined by spice identity.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one colored spice scattered randomly? Actually each example has many colored cells of same color (B, R, G). The output is 3x3 pattern of X (grey) forming a shape that seems to be the "crystallization pattern" of that spice. So we need to identify which color is present (the spice) and output its pattern. Look at Example1: Input color B (blue). Output pattern: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. That's a plus sign. Example2: Input color R (red). Output: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted L? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like a T rotated? Let's visualize coordinates (row,col) 0-index: X at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a T shape (upside-down T? Actually T shape with stem downwards). So pattern is a T. Example3: Input color G (green). Output: . . X . . X X X X That's like a rotated L shape: bottom row full, rightmost column full. That's like a mirrored L (like a gamma). So pattern is an L shape (right angle) with long side bottom row, vertical side right column. Thus each color corresponds to a specific shape: B => plus, R => T, G => L (rotated). Need to map test input: color present is G (green). So output should be same pattern as example3 (since same spice). Let's verify if there are any variations based on distribution? In example3, the green cells are scattered. Output is L shape. So for any green input, output L shape. Thus output grid 3x3 with X's forming L shape as in example3. Example3 output: . . X . . X X X X We need to output same. Check orientation: In example3, the L shape is bottom row full, rightmost column full. That's a rotated L (like a gamma). So answer should be that. Thus final answer grid: . . X . . X X X X Make sure using spaces.
"The notes are scattered across the staff like a child's first attempt at composition, but every instrument, when it hears its own timbre echoed back, reflexively plays the same signature riff — the melody is in the voice, not the score."
120b: k=3
See: Random notes written in a single instrument's color of ink splashed across a dark staff.
Do: Recognize the instrument by its ink color and play its signature riff — a compact motif that never changes regardless of what was written on the page.
Grid: Input: 5x5 staff with one ink color. Output: 3x3 riff pattern in grey, fixed per instrument.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one ink color (non-black). Output 3x3 pattern of X (grey) and . (black). The pattern depends on instrument (color). So each color yields a fixed 3x3 pattern. We have examples for B (blue), R (red), G (green). Need to deduce pattern for each. Example1 (blue): Input 5x5 with B positions. Output: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and arms, but missing corners. Actually pattern: center X, up, down, left, right all X, corners . So a plus. Example2 (red): Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like an L rotated? Actually shape: a vertical line down middle plus top row full. So like a T but missing right side? Wait T would be top row full, middle column full. That would be X X X top, . X . middle, . X . bottom. That's exactly output. So red yields T shape. Example3 (green): Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: rightmost column full X, bottom row full X. That's like an inverted L (mirror of T?). Actually shape: bottom row full, right column full. That's like a rotated T? It's like a L shape with bottom row and right column. So each color corresponds to a specific 3x3 pattern: blue = plus, red = T (top full), green = L (bottom row + right column). Need to map test input which is green (G). So output should be green pattern: bottom row full X, right column full X. Thus output grid 3x3: Row1: . . X Row2: . . X Row3: X X X Check if matches example3 exactly. Yes. Thus answer same as example3. Provide output.
"The players scramble across the field in chaos, but when the referee blows the whistle, each team falls into formation — and every team only knows one formation, branded into muscle memory by the color of their jersey."
120b: k=3
See: Players in matching jerseys scattered across a dark playing field.
Do: Identify the jersey color and call the team's one and only formation — a compact tactical shape burned into their playbook.
Grid: Input: 5x5 field with one jersey color scattered. Output: 3x3 formation diagram in grey, unique to that team.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with scattered cells of a particular color (the "jersey color") among black '.' background. Output 3x3 pattern in grey 'X' representing formation shape unique to that color. So we need to detect the color present (non '.' cells) and output a 3x3 pattern based on that color. We have three training examples: color B (blue), R (red), G (green). Output patterns differ. Let's map. Example1 (B): Input 5x5 with B positions. Output 3x3: . X . X X X . X . So pattern is a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, but missing corners. That's a plus sign. Example2 (R): Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: a vertical line of three X in middle column? Wait grid 3x3: rows: Row1: X X X (top row all X) Row2: . X . (center) Row3: . X . (bottom center) That's like a T shape? Actually top row full, then column down from center. That's a T shape (upside-down T? Actually T with stem down). So shape: top row full, middle column full (center already counted). So shape like a T. Example3 (G): Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: bottom row full, rightmost column full (including bottom right already). That's like an inverted T (stem up). Actually shape like a rotated T: bottom row full, column up from rightmost column. That's like a L rotated? Let's see: bottom row full, right column full. That's like a reversed L shape? Actually shape is like a "Γ" shape (Greek gamma) with bottom horizontal and right vertical. So each color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern. We need to deduce mapping: B -> plus, R -> T (top bar), G -> inverted T (right bar). Possibly mapping based on orientation of the scattered cells in input? Maybe the pattern is derived from the convex hull or distribution of the color in input. Let's examine input patterns. Example1 B input grid: Row0: B . B . . Row1: B . . B B Row2: B B . B . Row3: . B . B . Row4: B . . . B Let's mark coordinates (row,col). Let's compute shape maybe like a plus? Let's see distribution: many B's scattered. Maybe we need to find the "center of mass" and then orientation? Not sure. Example2 R input: Row0: R . R . R Row1: R . . . R Row2: R R . . . Row3: R . . R R Row4: R R R . R Seems many R's, maybe shape of letter? Let's see pattern of R's maybe forms a T shape? Let's visualize quickly: positions of R: many. Hard. Example3 G input: Row0: . G . G . Row1: G G . . . Row2: . G . . . Row3: . . G . . Row4: G G G . . Again many G's. Maybe rule: Identify the color that appears most frequently? But each input only contains one non-black color (the jersey). So that's the color. Then output pattern is predetermined per color: B => plus, R => T (top bar), G => inverted T (right bar). So we just need to output pattern for G (green) as per example3. The test input also uses G. So output should be same as example3? Possibly yes. But need to verify if there are variations per arrangement? Example3 output pattern is bottom row full, right column full. That's like a rot ... [1954 chars truncated]
"Storm cells gather in different patterns each day, but every front — cold, warm, or occluded — always leaves behind the same pressure signature on the barograph, as if the atmosphere has only three fingerprints."
120b: k=3
See: A weather map with scattered storm cells all tinted in one front's characteristic color.
Do: Read the color of the front and draw its invariant pressure signature — a small fixed pattern the atmosphere always stamps down for that front type.
Grid: Input: 5x5 map with one colored front scattered. Output: 3x3 pressure signature in grey, fixed per front type.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with scattered cells of a single color (front). Output 3x3 pattern of grey X. The pattern depends on color of front (B,R,G). Let's examine examples. Example1: front color B (blue). Input grid 5x5 with B scattered. Output 3x3 pattern: . X . X X X . X . So pattern is a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. That's a plus. Example2: front color R. Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: a T shape? Actually first row all X, second row center X, third row center X. That's like an inverted T? Let's visualize coordinates (row,col) 0-index in 3x3: (0,0) X, (0,1) X, (0,2) X (1,0) ., (1,1) X, (1,2) . (2,0) ., (2,1) X, (2,2) . So shape is a vertical line down middle plus top row full. That's like a "Γ" rotated? Could be shape of letter "T" (top bar across, stem down middle). Yes T shape. Example3: front color G. Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: rotated T opposite direction? Actually top row rightmost X, middle row rightmost X, bottom row all X. That's like a T rotated 180 degrees (stem up). So shape is T pointing down? Wait original T shape (example2) had top bar across, stem down. That's T pointing downwards (like typical T). Example3 has bottom bar across, stem up (upside-down T). So orientation depends on something. Thus each front color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern orientation maybe based on distribution of front cells in input? Let's analyze input patterns to see orientation. Example1 (B): Input pattern maybe symmetric? Let's map B positions coordinates (row, col): Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) Seems many B's. Maybe compute centroid? The pattern output is plus shape centered maybe at centroid? But output is fixed per front type, not dependent on positions? The description says "draw its invariant pressure signature — a small fixed pattern the atmosphere always stamps down for that front type." So pattern is fixed per front type, independent of distribution. So B => plus shape. R => T shape (top bar). G => upside-down T shape. Thus we need mapping: B->plus, R->T (top bar), G->upside-down T. Need to confirm with test input color G, so output should be same as example3 (since same front color). So output 3x3 pattern for G is: . . X . . X X X X Check orientation: In example3 output matches that. So answer should be that grid. Thus produce output grid 3x3 with '.' for black, 'X' for grey. Write as rows with spaces. Answer block.
"Bricks tumble from the demolition in random heaps, but the mason who sees their glaze knows exactly which keystone to carve — each clay has one destiny, and the rubble's arrangement is irrelevant to the arch it will become."
120b: k=3
See: Rubble of one type of glazed brick scattered across a dark foundation.
Do: Identify the glaze color and carve the keystone pattern that clay was always meant to form.
Grid: Input: 5x5 foundation with one colored brick type. Output: 3x3 keystone pattern in grey, determined by glaze.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one colored brick type (non-black). Output 3x3 pattern in grey X, determined by glaze (color). The output pattern seems to be a "keystone" shape maybe like a plus or something. Let's examine examples. Example1 input: color B (blue). Grid 5x5 with B's scattered. Output 3x3: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, but missing corners. Actually pattern: X at (0,1), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1). That's a plus. Example2 input: color R. Output: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted L? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like a T rotated? Let's map coordinates: rows0-2, cols0-2. X at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a T shape (top bar, vertical stem down from middle). So shape differs. Example3 input: color G. Output: . . X . . X X X X Coordinates: (0,2),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2). That's like rotated T opposite direction (stem up from bottom bar). So shape orientation depends on something about input distribution. So rule: Determine orientation of keystone based on arrangement of colored bricks in input. Perhaps find the "center of mass" or direction of majority? Let's analyze. In each input, there is a pattern of colored bricks maybe forming a line? Let's view example1 B positions. Write coordinates (row,col) 0-index. Input1: Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) So many B's. Maybe we need to find the "missing" pattern? The output plus shape maybe corresponds to the location of the "hole" in the distribution? Not sure. Example2 R positions: Row0: R . R . R => (0,0),(0,2),(0,4) Row1: R . . . R => (1,0),(1,4) Row2: R R . . . => (2,0),(2,1) Row3: R . . R R => (3,0),(3,3),(3,4) Row4: R R R . R => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4) Output T shape (top bar). Maybe orientation corresponds to direction where colored bricks are most dense? Let's compute bounding box of colored bricks. Example1: min row 0, max row 4, min col 0, max col 4 (full). Not helpful. Maybe we need to find the "missing" color cell that would complete a 3x3 pattern somewhere within the 5x5? For each possible 3x3 subgrid, count colored cells? The output pattern maybe indicates where the missing cells are? Let's test. Take example1: Look for a 3x3 region where the pattern of B's matches a plus shape missing? Actually output is plus shape of X (grey). Maybe we need to locate the 3x3 region where the colored bricks are absent (i.e., black) and fill with X? Let's examine 5x5 input for a 3x3 region that is all black (.)? Not likely. Check each 3x3 subgrid of example1 for pattern of B's maybe forming a shape that is complement of plus? Let's compute subgrid at rows1-3, cols1-3 (center). The cells: Rows1-3, cols1-3: (1,1)=., (1,2)=., (1,3)=B (2,1)=B, (2,2)=., (2,3)=B (3,1)=B, (3,2)=., (3,3)=B Pattern: B at (1,3), ... [10499 chars truncated]
"Scouts report skirmish positions scattered across the map, but the general cares only about the color of the enemy banner — each kingdom deploys to a single siege formation, no matter how their scouts were arranged."
120b: k=3
See: Enemy positions marked in one banner color scattered across a dark war map.
Do: Identify the kingdom by banner color and deploy its predetermined siege formation — a compact tactical shape.
Grid: Input: 5x5 war map with one colored force. Output: 3x3 siege formation in grey, fixed per kingdom.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one colored force (one banner color) scattered across dark map (black '.' is background). Output is 3x3 shape in grey X, fixed per kingdom (color). So each input color corresponds to a particular 3x3 pattern of X and . (maybe also other colors?). Let's examine examples. Example1: Input color B (blue). Output pattern: . X . X X X . X . That's a plus shape (cross) with center and four orthogonal arms, missing corners. So pattern is a plus. Example2: Input color R (red). Output: X X X . X . . X . That's like an inverted L? Actually shape: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. So shape is a T rotated? Let's visualize: coordinates (row,col) 0-index. X at (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's a T shape (top bar across, vertical down from middle). So pattern is a T. Example3: Input color G (green). Output: . . X . . X X X X That's like rotated T (right side). X at (0,2),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2). That's a T rotated 90° clockwise (vertical bar on right, base at bottom). So pattern is a rotated T. Thus each color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern orientation maybe based on something about distribution of that color in input? Let's see: Input patterns maybe indicate orientation. For B example, the B positions maybe form a plus shape? Let's examine B input grid: Row0: B . B . . Row1: B . . B B Row2: B B . B . Row3: . B . B . Row4: B . . . B Plot coordinates of B. Let's see shape: many B's. Could be a plus? Not exactly. But maybe we need to find the "kingdom" by majority color? Actually each input has only one non-black color (the banner). So we just need to map that color to predetermined shape. So mapping: B -> plus, R -> T (up), G -> T (right). So we need mapping for G? Already have G mapping to rotated T (right). Test input also uses G. So output should be same as example3? Possibly same pattern regardless of arrangement of G cells. So output for G should be the same pattern: . . X / . . X / X X X. But need verify if orientation maybe depends on something else like the distribution of G in input (maybe orientation determined by bounding box of G). Let's examine example3 input to see orientation: Input G positions: Row0: . G . G . Row1: G G . . . Row2: . G . . . Row3: . . G . . Row4: G G G . . Let's compute bounding box: min row 0, max row 4; min col 0? there is G at (1,0) and (4,0). So min col 0, max col 3? there is G at (0,3) and (3,2). So width 4 columns (0-3). Not square. Maybe orientation determined by where the "center" of mass is? Not sure. Example2 input R positions: Rows: 0: R . R . R 1: R . . . R 2: R R . . . 3: R . . R R 4: R R R . R Many R's. Output is T up (top bar). Could orientation be based on something like the "missing" corners? Not. Example1 B input: many B's. Output plus shape (symmetrical). So maybe each color maps to a specific shape independent of arrangement. So for G we already have shape rotated T right. So answer should be that shape. Let's double-ch ... [264 chars truncated]
"The actors mill about backstage in disarray, but when the curtain rises, each troupe — distinguishable only by the color of their masks — strikes a single iconic tableau that has been theirs since antiquity."
120b: k=3
See: Performers in identical colored masks milling about a dark backstage.
Do: Note the mask color and reveal the troupe's eternal tableau — one frozen pose per company, regardless of where they stood in the wings.
Grid: Input: 5x5 backstage with one mask color scattered. Output: 3x3 tableau in grey, unique per troupe.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one mask color scattered? Actually each example has a specific color (B, R, G) appearing multiple times. Output is 3x3 with X (grey) pattern representing something like convex hull? Let's examine. Example1 input 5x5 with B's and . (black). Output 3x3 with X pattern: Input1 grid coordinates (row, col 0-4). Let's map B positions: Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) So many B's. Output 3x3: . X . X X X . X . Positions of X: (0,1),(1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,1). That's a plus shape (cross) with center and arms. So rule maybe: find the "center of mass" of B's? The plus shape maybe indicates something like the pattern of B's relative to something else. Let's examine Example2 with R. Input2 R positions: Row0: R . R . R => (0,0),(0,2),(0,4) Row1: R . . . R => (1,0),(1,4) Row2: R R . . . => (2,0),(2,1) Row3: R . . R R => (3,0),(3,3),(3,4) Row4: R R R . R => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4) Output2: X X X . X . . X . X positions: (0,0),(0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,1). That's like an L shape rotated? Actually shape: top row all X, then a vertical line down from middle column. Example3 with G. Input3 G positions: Row0: . G . G . => (0,1),(0,3) Row1: G G . . . => (1,0),(1,1) Row2: . G . . . => (2,1) Row3: . . G . . => (3,2) Row4: G G G . . => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2) Output3: . . X . . X X X X X positions: (0,2),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1),(2,2). That's like a rotated L shape (bottom row full, rightmost column top two). Actually shape similar to example2 but rotated 180? Let's compare. Example2 X positions: top row full, middle column vertical down from row1 to row2 (positions (1,1),(2,1)). That's like a T shape? Wait shape: top row full (3 X), then column at col1 rows1-2 X. That's like a "Γ" shape (like rotated L). Example3 shape: bottom row full, column at col2 rows0-1 X. That's same shape rotated 180 degrees (mirror). Example1 shape: plus shape. So maybe rule depends on orientation of the mask color distribution? Perhaps we need to compute bounding box of the colored cells, then produce a 3x3 pattern representing something like the shape of the convex hull of the colored cells after scaling down to 3x3? Let's test. For each example, compute minimal bounding rectangle of colored cells. Example1 B bounding box: min row 0, max row 4, min col 0, max col 4 (full). So 5x5. If we downscale to 3x3 by some rule (maybe majority per 2x2 block?), we might get plus shape? Let's try dividing 5x5 into 3x3 cells each covering approx 5/3 ≈1.67 rows/cols. Not straightforward. Maybe rule: find the "center of mass" of colored cells, then output a 3x3 pattern where X marks cells that are at Manhattan distance <=1 from center? That would produce plus shape (center and orthogonal neighbors). Example1 output is plus shape. Does the center of mass of B's lie at (2,2)? Let's comp ... [9692 chars truncated]
"Seeds blow in the wind and land wherever they please, but when the gardener finds them, she knows by their hue which trellis shape to build — every flower climbs its own geometry, indifferent to where it was sown."
120b: k=3
See: Seeds of one flower type scattered across dark soil.
Do: Identify the flower by seed color and construct its trellis — a compact frame that each species requires, always the same shape.
Grid: Input: 5x5 soil with one seed color. Output: 3x3 trellis pattern in grey, fixed per species.
We need to infer rule. Input 5x5 with one seed color (the colored cells are same color? In examples, each input has a single non-black color: Example1 uses B (blue). Example2 uses R (red). Example3 uses G (green). So seed color is the colored cells. Output is 3x3 pattern of X (grey) and . (black) forming a shape specific to seed color. Need to map seed color to a fixed 3x3 pattern. Let's examine each example. Example1 Input B pattern: Let's map coordinates. 5x5 grid indices (row0-4, col0-4). Represent B positions. Row0: B . B . . => (0,0),(0,2) Row1: B . . B B => (1,0),(1,3),(1,4) Row2: B B . B . => (2,0),(2,1),(2,3) Row3: . B . B . => (3,1),(3,3) Row4: B . . . B => (4,0),(4,4) So shape maybe like a plus? Not sure. Output pattern for B: . X . X X X . X . That's a cross shape (plus) with center X and arms up/down/left/right. So pattern is a plus. Example2 Input R positions: Row0: R . R . R => (0,0),(0,2),(0,4) Row1: R . . . R => (1,0),(1,4) Row2: R R . . . => (2,0),(2,1) Row3: R . . R R => (3,0),(3,3),(3,4) Row4: R R R . R => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4) Output: X X X . X . . X . Pattern: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. That's like a T shape rotated? Actually shape looks like a vertical line with a top horizontal bar: a "T" shape (upside-down? Wait typical T: horizontal bar on top, vertical stem down from center). Yes that's exactly: top row all X, middle row center X, bottom row center X. So T shape. Example3 Input G positions: Row0: . G . G . => (0,1),(0,3) Row1: G G . . . => (1,0),(1,1) Row2: . G . . . => (2,1) Row3: . . G . . => (3,2) Row4: G G G . . => (4,0),(4,1),(4,2) Output: . . X . . X X X X Pattern: bottom row all X, rightmost column X (top two rows). That's like an L shape rotated 90 degrees? Actually shape is like a rotated L: vertical line on right side, horizontal line at bottom. That's like a "Γ" shape (mirror L). So shape is an L with vertical on right, horizontal bottom. Thus each seed color maps to a specific 3x3 pattern: B => plus, R => T, G => L (right-bottom). Need to determine mapping for other colors maybe but only need for G (green) as test input uses G. So output should be same pattern as example3: bottom row all X, rightmost column X (top two rows). Let's verify. But need to ensure orientation maybe depends on something else like distribution of seeds? However all examples show same pattern per color regardless of arrangement. So rule: Identify the unique non-black color; output a 3x3 pattern associated with that color: B => plus, R => T, G => L (right-bottom). So for test input with G, output same as example3. Thus answer grid: Row0: . . X Row1: . . X Row2: X X X Check format: characters separated by spaces. Let's produce.
See: The input is a rectangular grid filled entirely with black (.) cells except for a single blue (B) cell located at the bottom-left corner (last row, first column). The grid has a fixed height of 10 rows and a variable width.
Do: Replace every black cell with azure (A). Then trace a diagonal bouncing path for the blue (B) cell starting from the bottom-left corner (last row, column 0), moving upward one row at a time. The B cell moves diagonally toward the right wall: each row up, the column index increases by 1. When the column reaches the rightmost position (width − 1), the direction reverses and the column decreases by 1 each row. When the column reaches 0, it reverses again, bouncing back to the right. Continue this zigzag until every row has exactly one B cell. Specifically, for each row from bottom (row H−1) to top (row 0), compute the column as follows: take the row's distance from the bottom (d = H−1 − row_index), compute d modulo (2 × (width − 1)), and if the result is less than or equal to width − 1 the column equals the result, otherwise the column equals 2 × (width − 1) minus the result. Place B at that column and A everywhere else in that row.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the input (same number of rows and columns). The background color is azure (A). Each row contains exactly one blue (B) cell. The grid uses a coordinate system where row 0 is the top and the last row is the bottom; column 0 is the left edge.
"A blue ball bouncing between the walls of a hallway"
120b: k=1
See: A dark, empty hallway stretches upward, ten stories tall. At the very bottom-left corner, a blue ball rests on the floor, ready to be launched.
Do: The lights come on — the darkness everywhere turns to a cool azure glow. The blue ball is kicked upward and to the right, ricocheting off the walls like a bouncing DVD screensaver logo. Each floor it rises, it drifts one step sideways. When it hits the right wall, it bounces back toward the left; when it hits the left wall, it bounces right again. It leaves its blue mark on every floor it passes through, painting exactly one footprint per story as it zigzags its way to the top.
Grid: The hallway keeps its original shape. The azure light fills every tile except where the ball has bounced — those tiles stay blue. Every floor has exactly one blue scuff mark. The ball starts its journey from the bottom-left corner and works its way upward.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with '.' black everywhere except a single B at bottom-left corner (row bottom, column left). Output in example 1 is a 10x3 grid (same dimensions as input). Output contains A (azure) and B (blue) placed in pattern. Let's examine pattern. Input 10 rows, 3 columns. B at row10 (bottom), col1. Output rows correspond? Let's list output rows (top to bottom): Row1: A B A Row2: B A A Row3: A B A Row4: A A B Row5: A B A Row6: B A A Row7: A B A Row8: A A B Row9: A B A Row10: B A A We need to see pattern of B's: positions of B in each row. Row1 col2 Row2 col1 Row3 col2 Row4 col3 Row5 col2 Row6 col1 Row7 col2 Row8 col3 Row9 col2 Row10 col1 So B moves like a bouncing ball moving up rows, shifting sideways each row, bouncing off walls (col1 and col3). Starting at bottom-left (row10 col1). Then moves up one row to row9, shift right one column => col2 (B). Row8 shift right => col3 (B). Row7 would shift right but hits wall, so bounce left => col2 (B). Row6 shift left => col1 (B). Row5 shift left would hit wall, bounce right => col2 (B). Row4 shift right => col3 (B). Row3 shift right would bounce left => col2 (B). Row2 shift left => col1 (B). Row1 shift left would bounce right => col2 (B). That matches pattern. All other cells become A (azure). So rule: fill all cells with A except the path of the moving B which retains B. The path is a diagonal bounce pattern starting from the B's original location (bottom-left) moving upward each row, shifting horizontally by +1 each step, bouncing off left/right edges. Now test input: grid 10 rows, 5 columns (since given 5 columns). B at bottom-left (row10 col1). Need to produce output 10x5 with A everywhere except B's path. We need to simulate bounce across width 5 columns. Columns indices 1..5. Start: row10 col1 (B). Direction: moving up each row, horizontal direction initially to the right (+1). At each step (row-1), we attempt to move horizontally by current direction. If next column would be out of bounds (0 or 6), we reverse direction before moving? In example, when at col3 (rightmost) with direction +1, next would be col4 out of bounds, so bounce: direction becomes -1, then move to col2. That matches pattern. Similarly at leftmost col1 with direction -1, bounce to +1 then move to col2. Thus we can simulate. Let's simulate rows from bottom (row10) up to row1. Initialize col =1, dir = +1. We'll record B positions per row. Row10: col1 (given). After marking, move to next row (row9): attempt col+dir =2 (within 1..5) so no bounce. col=2. dir stays +1. Row9: col2. Next row8: col+dir=3 within, col=3. Row8: col3. Next row7: col+dir=4 within, col=4. Row7: col4. Next row6: col+dir=5 within, col=5. Row6: col5 (rightmost). Next row5: attempt col+dir=6 out of bounds, so bounce: dir = -1, then col = col + dir = 5-1=4. Row5: col4. Next row4: col+dir=3 within, col=3. Row4: col3. Next row3: col+dir=2 within, col=2. Row3: col2. Next row2: col+dir=1 wit ... [1129 chars truncated]
"A single nerve impulse zigzagging through a column of tissue"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dormant tissue sample—rows of silent black cells—with one activated blue neuron at the base.
Do: The impulse fires upward through the tissue, ricocheting off the cell membrane walls on each side, lighting every cell it passes through blue while the resting tissue turns azure with oxygenated blood.
Grid: Same dimensions. Azure background with one blue cell per row tracing the impulse path.
"A comet oscillating between the gravitational pulls of two binary stars"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark void of black space with a single blue comet at the lower-left edge.
Do: The comet drifts upward, pulled diagonally toward one star, then slung back toward the other when it nears the boundary. The void fills with azure cosmic dust from its tail, while the comet's blue nucleus occupies one position per row.
Grid: Same void dimensions. Azure dust background, one blue comet per row.
"A ship tacking against the wind up a narrow channel"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark channel of black water with a blue-hulled vessel anchored at the bottom-left.
Do: The ship sails upward, tacking diagonally toward one shore then turning about to angle toward the other. The water lightens to azure with the morning tide, while the blue ship occupies a single cell in each row of the channel.
Grid: Same channel dimensions. Azure water throughout, one blue hull per row.
"An electron bouncing between the plates of a vertical capacitor"
120b: k=1
See: A de-energized black circuit element with a single blue electron at the bottom-left plate.
Do: Voltage is applied and the electron accelerates upward, deflecting off the conductive plates on alternating sides. The dielectric medium between the plates charges to azure, while the electron's blue position is marked once per row.
Grid: Same capacitor dimensions. Azure dielectric with one blue electron per row.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with many rows, black '.' except a single 'B' at bottom-left (row last, column 0). Output is same dimensions? Example 1 input is 10 rows, 3 columns. Output also 10 rows, 3 columns. Input had B at row 9 (0-index) column0. Output shows pattern of A and B alternating. Let's examine output grid. Rows (0 to9): 0: A B A 1: B A A 2: A B A 3: A A B 4: A B A 5: B A A 6: A B A 7: A A B 8: A B A 9: B A A We need to see pattern: seems like a diagonal of B moving upward right? Let's map coordinates where B appears. Row0 col1 B Row1 col0 B Row2 col1 B Row3 col2 B Row4 col1 B Row5 col0 B Row6 col1 B Row7 col2 B Row8 col1 B Row9 col0 B So B positions follow a pattern: starting at bottom-left (row9 col0) then moving up one row and right one column (row8 col1), then up one row left? Actually row8 col1 is B? Wait row8 col1 is B yes. That's up one row, right one column from row9 col0. Next row7 col2 B (up one, right one). Row6 col1 B (up one, left one). Row5 col0 B (up one, left one). Row4 col1 B (up one, right one). Row3 col2 B (up one, right one). Row2 col1 B (up one, left one). Row1 col0 B (up one, left one). Row0 col1 B (up one, right one). So B moves in a zigzag: right, right, left, left, right, right, left, left... basically bouncing between columns 0,1,2? The grid width 3. Starting at col0 bottom. It moves up each row, and column changes direction when hitting edges? Let's simulate: start col0, direction +1 (right). Row9 col0. Move up to row8, col1 (within bounds). Continue direction +1, row7 col2. Next step would be col3 out of bounds, so bounce direction -1, row6 col1. Continue direction -1, row5 col0. Next would be col-1 out, bounce +1, row4 col1. Continue +1, row3 col2. Next bounce -1, row2 col1. Continue -1, row1 col0. Next bounce +1, row0 col1. That's exactly pattern. So rule: starting from the B at bottom-left, propagate a "electron" upward one row per step, moving horizontally each step, bouncing off left/right edges, marking its position with B in each row. All other cells become azure 'A' (dielectric). So output fills all cells with A except the B path. Thus transformation: Input grid with a single B at bottom-left (maybe any column?) The output grid same size, fill all cells with A, then draw a path of B moving upward each row, column changes by +1 each step, reflecting at edges (0 and width-1). That's like a diagonal bounce. Now test input: 10 rows, 5 columns. Input has B at bottom-left (row9 col0). So we need to produce output 10x5 grid. Fill all with A, then compute B positions per row using bounce rule. Width =5 columns indices 0-4. Starting row9 col0 direction +1 (right). We'll compute for rows 9 up to 0. Initialize col=0, dir=+1. Row9: col0 B. Row8: col = col+dir =1. Within bounds. Row8 col1 B. Row7: col=2. Row7 col2 B. Row6: col=3. Row6 col3 B. Row5: col=4. Row5 col4 B. Row4: next col would be 5 out of bounds, so bounce: dir = -1, col = col+dir =3. Row4 col3 B. Row3: col=2. Row3 col2 B. ... [606 chars truncated]
"Hermes ascending Olympus, his winged sandals carrying him wall to wall through the zigzag passage of the gods"
120b: k=2
See: A dark obsidian corridor with a single blue divine spark at the bottom-left threshold.
Do: The messenger god springs upward, his path angling between the narrow corridor walls, reversing at each side. His passage awakens the stone to glowing azure, while his blue sandal-print marks one tile per level.
Grid: Same corridor dimensions. Azure awakened stone, one blue footprint per row.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid with many rows, columns. In examples, input has a single B at bottom-left (row last, column 0). Rest are '.' (black). Output shows pattern of A and B alternating in some pattern. Example 2: Input size? Let's count rows: lines show 10 rows? Actually example 2 input: ". ." repeated 9? Let's count: lines: ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." ". ." "B ." That's 11 rows, 2 columns. Output is 11 rows, 2 columns with pattern: A B B A A B B A ... alternating each row, starting with A B at top row, then B A, etc. The bottom row (row 10 index) corresponds to input B .? Let's see output bottom row is "B A". So bottom row has B at column0, A at column1. Input bottom row had B at column0, . at column1. So B stays B? In output bottom row column0 is B (same). The other cells become A (azure). So rule: fill all '.' with A except some pattern? Actually top rows also have A and B alternating, not all A. So pattern seems like a diagonal or zigzag path of B's? Let's examine example 2 output grid 11x2: Row0: A B Row1: B A Row2: A B Row3: B A Row4: A B Row5: B A Row6: A B Row7: B A Row8: A B Row9: B A Row10: B A Wait row9 is B A, row10 also B A. That's two consecutive same? Let's list: Starting with row0 A B, then alternating each row. With 11 rows, pattern would be: row0 A B, row1 B A, row2 A B, row3 B A, row4 A B, row5 B A, row6 A B, row7 B A, row8 A B, row9 B A, row10 A B (if alternating). But actual bottom row is B A, not A B. So pattern maybe starts from top with A B, then alternates, but bottom row forced to have B at column0 (original B). So maybe rule: there is a "messenger god" path that starts at bottom-left B and moves upward, bouncing off walls, marking a B each step? The description: "messenger god springs upward, his path angling between the narrow corridor walls, reversing at each side. His passage awakens the stone to glowing azure, while his blue sandal-print marks one tile per level." So path of B (blue) goes upward diagonally, bouncing off left/right walls, leaving a B each row (one per row). The rest become A (azure). Input corridor is black '.' initially. The bottom-left tile is B (starting point). The path goes upward, at each step moves up one row and right one column? Since corridor width maybe 2 columns in example 2. Starting at (row10, col0). Move up-right to (row9, col1) -> B? Output row9 col1 is A? Wait row9 col1 is A (since row9 is B A). Actually row9 col0 B, col1 A. So not right. Let's simulate: Starting at bottom-left (row10 col0) B. Next row up (row9) maybe B at col0 again? But rule says one blue per row, maybe column alternates between 0 and 1 as it bounces. Let's examine output column positions of B in each row for example2: Rows index 0 top to 10 bottom. Row0: col1 B Row1: col0 B Row2: col1 B Row3: col0 B Row4: col1 B Row5: col0 B Row6: col1 B Row7: col0 B Row8: col1 B Row9: col0 B Row10: col0 B (starting point) So pattern: B moves right then left alternating, but at bo ... [6197 chars truncated]
"A dancer chassé-ing diagonally across the stage, reversing at each wing"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A darkened black dance floor with a single blue dancer poised at the downstage-left mark.
Do: The dancer leaps diagonally upstage, chassé-ing one step per beat, pivoting when they reach a wing and cutting back across. The floor lights shift to azure, while the dancer's blue position is marked once per row of the stage.
Grid: Same stage dimensions. Azure floor, one blue dancer position per row.
"A vein of sapphire crystal zigzagging through sedimentary layers"
120b: k=2
See: A dark cross-section of black bedrock with a single blue mineral deposit visible at the lowest-left stratum.
Do: Tectonic pressure forces the crystal vein upward at an angle, fracturing and redirecting each time it hits the formation boundary. The surrounding rock metamorphoses to azureite, while the sapphire-blue vein occupies one point per stratum.
Grid: Same cross-section dimensions. Azure rock matrix with one blue crystal point per layer.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are tall (10 rows) with a single B at bottom left (row 10 column 1). Output grids have same dimensions? Example1 input 10 rows, 3 columns. Output 10 rows, 3 columns. Example2 input 10 rows, 2 columns. Output 10 rows, 2 columns. So output same size. Pattern: Output seems to be a checkerboard of A and B, but with a diagonal pattern? Let's examine Example2 (2 columns). Input: B at bottom left (row10 col1). Output rows: Row1: A B Row2: B A Row3: A B Row4: B A Row5: A B Row6: B A Row7: A B Row8: B A Row9: A B Row10: B A So it's alternating pattern starting with A B at top row. That's like a checkerboard where (row+col) even => A, odd => B? Let's test: row1 col1 (1+1=2 even) => A matches. row1 col2 (1+2=3 odd) => B matches. Row2 col1 (2+1=3 odd) => B matches. Row2 col2 (2+2=4 even) => A matches. So yes. Now Example1 3 columns. Output rows: Row1: A B A Row2: B A A Row3: A B A Row4: A A B Row5: A B A Row6: B A A Row7: A B A Row8: A A B Row9: A B A Row10: B A A Let's compute checkerboard pattern (row+col even => A, odd => B). For 3 columns: Row1: col1 even => A, col2 odd => B, col3 even => A => matches row1. Row2: col1 odd => B, col2 even => A, col3 odd => B. But output row2 is B A A (col3 A not B). So pattern deviates. Let's examine pattern maybe is a diagonal line of B moving upward each row? Input B at bottom left. Output seems to have B's forming a diagonal that moves up-right each row, but also some extra B's? Let's list positions of B in each row (1-indexed rows top to bottom). Row1: column2. Row2: column1. Row3: column2. Row4: column3. Row5: column2. Row6: column1. Row7: column2. Row8: column3. Row9: column2. Row10: column1. So pattern repeats every 3 rows? Sequence: 2,1,2,3,2,1,2,3,2,1. That's like a wave moving between columns 1-3, centered at column2. Looks like a "bouncing" pattern: start at col2 (row1), then move left to col1 (row2), then right to col2 (row3), then right to col3 (row4), then left to col2 (row5), left to col1 (row6), etc. So it's like a point moving diagonally up-right each step, but reflecting at boundaries (leftmost/rightmost). Starting from bottom left B at row10 col1. The rule described: "crystal vein upward at an angle, fracturing and redirecting each time it hits the formation boundary. The surrounding rock metamorphoses to azureite, while the sapphire-blue vein occupies one point per stratum." So we have a moving point (blue) that moves up one row each step, and also moves right one column each step (diagonal up-right). When it would go beyond right boundary, it reflects (bounce) and moves left instead. Similarly left boundary? Starting at bottom left (row10 col1). Move up-right: next row9 col2 (that's B at row9 col2). Next row8 col3 (B at row8 col3). Next would be col4 but width is 3, so bounce: direction reverses horizontal, so move up-left: row7 col2 (B). Next row6 col1 (B). Next would be col0, bounce again, move up-right: row5 c ... [3592 chars truncated]
"A single blueberry rolling across a layered crepe cake as it's tilted side to side"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stack of pale crepe layers with a lone blueberry resting at the bottom-left corner.
Do: The cake is gently rocked, and the blueberry rolls diagonally upward, reversing direction each time it hits the edge of the plate. Each layer it crosses is stained azure with butter glaze, while the berry leaves its blue mark at one position per layer.
Grid: Same dimensions as the stack. Butter-glazed azure layers with one blueberry-blue mark per row.
"A single note glissanding between the lowest and highest strings of a harp"
120b: k=1
See: A silent harp of black strings with one blue note struck at the bottom-left string.
Do: The note slides upward across the strings, sweeping toward the highest pitch then back down, each string it touches resonating blue while all other strings hum with a soft azure overtone.
Grid: Same frame of strings. Azure resonance everywhere, with one blue vibrating string per row.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid of black '.' except one blue 'B' at bottom-left (row last, column first). Output is a pattern of A (azure) and B (blue) arranged in some pattern. Example 1: Input is 10 rows, 3 columns? Actually input shows 10 rows, each with 3 entries: first 9 rows are ". . .", last row "B . .". Output is 10 rows, 3 columns with A and B. We need to see pattern: Output rows: Row1: A B A Row2: B A A Row3: A B A Row4: A A B Row5: A B A Row6: B A A Row7: A B A Row8: A A B Row9: A B A Row10: B A A Looks like a diagonal pattern of B moving? Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input B at (9,0). Output B's positions: list rows with B at which columns. Row0: col1 Row1: col0 Row2: col1 Row3: col2 Row4: col1 Row5: col0 Row6: col1 Row7: col2 Row8: col1 Row9: col0 So pattern repeats every 4? Sequence of column indices: 1,0,1,2,1,0,1,2,1,0. That's like a wave: start at col1 (one right of input), then move left to col0, then right to col1, then right to col2, then back left to col1, then left to col0, etc. This matches description: note slides upward across strings, sweeping toward highest pitch then back down. So starting from bottom-left B, the blue note moves upward (row decreasing) while moving horizontally: first step up one row, move right? Actually from input B at bottom-left (row9 col0). Output row9 (same row) has B at col0 (same). Row8 (one up) has B at col1 (right). Row7 (two up) has B at col0? Wait row7 output is A A B (col2). Actually row7 is row index 7 (third from bottom). Output row7: A A B => B at col2. That's two steps right from original? Let's list from bottom upward: Row9 (bottom): B at col0 (original) Row8: B at col1 (right) Row7: B at col2 (right) Row6: B at col1 (left) Row5: B at col0 (left) Row4: B at col1 (right) Row3: B at col2 (right) Row2: B at col1 (left) Row1: B at col0 (left) Row0: B at col1 (right) So pattern: start at col0, then move right each step until reach rightmost column (col2) then move left back, etc. It's like a bouncing ball horizontally as it moves up each row. The width is 3 columns, so bounce between 0 and 2. Starting direction is right. So each row up, column index increments by direction (+1 or -1). When hitting edge, direction reverses. Thus rule: For each row from bottom to top, place a B at a column that moves like a ping-pong across columns, starting at the original B column at bottom row, moving right initially. All other cells become A (azure). So azure everywhere else. Now test input: grid 10 rows, 5 columns, B at bottom-left (row9 col0). So we need to generate output 10x5 with B moving horizontally bouncing between 0 and 4 as we go up rows. Start at row9 col0 (B). Direction initially right (+1). For each step up (row-1), column = col + dir. If next column would be out of bounds (col+dir >4 or <0), reverse direction before moving? In example, when at col2 (rightmost) direction was +1, next step would be out, so they reversed direction to -1 and moved to col1. ... [1830 chars truncated]
"A squash ball caroming between the side walls on its way to the front wall"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A black court viewed from above, with a blue squash ball in the near-left corner.
Do: The ball is struck and travels forward, bouncing off the left and right side walls alternately. Each row of the court it crosses gets scuffed azure by shoe marks, while the ball itself leaves a single blue impact point per row.
Grid: Court dimensions unchanged. Azure floor with one blue bounce mark per row.
"A bolt of lightning forking back and forth between storm cloud walls"
120b: k=1
See: A dark black thunderhead with a single blue spark glowing at its base on the left side.
Do: The lightning bolt crackles upward, deflecting off the charged walls of the cloud channel, switching direction each time it hits a boundary. The entire cloud interior illuminates azure, with the bolt's bright blue core visible at one point per layer.
Grid: Same cloud dimensions. Azure illumination throughout, one blue bolt-point per row.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is a grid of 10 rows, 3 columns? Actually example input shows 10 rows, each with 3 entries: first 9 rows are ". . ." (black). Last row is "B . .". Output is 10x3 grid with A, B, etc. Pattern appears like a diagonal of B's moving? Let's write coordinates: rows 0-9, cols 0-2.
Input has a single B at row9 col0 (bottom left). Output shows pattern of A and B. Let's map output rows:
Row0: A B A
Row1: B A A
Row2: A B A
Row3: A A B
Row4: A B A
Row5: B A A
Row6: A B A
Row7: A A B
Row8: A B A
Row9: B A A
We see a repeating pattern of length 3 rows? Let's list B positions per row: row0 col1, row1 col0, row2 col1, row3 col2, row4 col1, row5 col0, row6 col1, row7 col2, row8 col1, row9 col0. So B moves: start at bottom left (row9 col0). Then moving upward, each step the B moves right? Actually from row9 col0 to row8 col1 (up one row, right one col). Row7 col2 (up one, right one). Row6 col1 (up one, left one). Row5 col0 (up one, left one). Row4 col1 (up one, right one). Row3 col2 (up one, right one). Row2 col1 (up one, left one). Row1 col0 (up one, left one). Row0 col1 (up one, right one). So pattern: B moves diagonally up-right until hits right boundary (col2), then reflects and moves up-left, etc. This matches metaphor: lightning bolt bouncing off walls.
Thus rule: Input has a single blue cell (B) at some location (maybe bottom left). Output fills entire grid with azure (A) except for a path of B that starts at the original B location and moves upward one row each step, changing horizontal direction when hitting leftmost or rightmost column, i.e., reflecting off vertical walls, creating a zigzag line covering all rows. The path includes exactly one B per row.
Also azure illumination throughout: all other cells become A.
Thus for test input: grid size? Provided test input: 10 rows, 5 columns (". . . . .") repeated 9 rows, last row "B . . . .". So 10x5 grid, B at bottom left (row9 col0). Need to generate output 10x5 with A everywhere except B path.
We need to simulate bounce. Columns indices 0-4. Starting at row9 col0, direction initially up-right (dx = -1 row, dy = +1 col). At each step move up one row, col += direction (right). If next col would be out of bounds (col<0 or col>=5), reflect direction horizontally (multiply dy by -1) before moving? In example, when at col2 (rightmost) they moved to col1 next row (i.e., reflected). So algorithm: before moving to next row, check if current col is at boundary; if so, reverse horizontal direction. Then move up one row and col += dy.
Let's simulate for 10 rows (rows 9 down to 0). We'll produce B positions for each row.
Initialize row=9, col=0, dir=+1 (right). Record B at row9 col0.
Now for next row (row8): before moving, check if col at boundary? col=0 left boundary, but direction is +1, not hitting left? Actually hitting left boundary only matters when direction is -1 (moving left). Since direction is +1, we can continue. Move up: row8, col=0+1=1. Record B at
... [2354 chars truncated]
"A lantern carried up a zigzagging staircase inside a lighthouse"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark lighthouse interior—black floors stacked vertically—with a blue lantern placed at the ground floor on the left.
Do: The keeper ascends, and the staircase forces them to walk diagonally, reversing at each wall. Every floor is bathed in ambient azure glow, while the lantern's blue flame marks exactly one position per floor.
Grid: Same tower dimensions. Azure ambient light on every cell, one blue lantern per floor.
"A tracer round ricocheting between bunker walls as it travels upward through a vertical shaft"
120b: k=1
See: A dark fortified shaft viewed in cross-section, with a single blue tracer at the bottom-left.
Do: The tracer is fired upward and pings off the left and right walls alternately, each ricochet changing its horizontal direction. The muzzle flash paints the shaft walls azure, while the tracer itself burns blue at one point per level.
Grid: Shaft dimensions unchanged. Azure walls with one blue tracer point per row.
We need to infer rule. Input is a grid of black '.' except a single B at bottom-left (row last, column first). Output is a pattern of A (azure) and B (blue) arranged in a 10x3 grid (same dimensions as input). Let's examine example. Input dimensions: 10 rows, 3 columns. B at (row10, col1). Output 10x3 with A and B. Let's write coordinates (row1 top). Output rows: 1: A B A 2: B A A 3: A B A 4: A A B 5: A B A 6: B A A 7: A B A 8: A A B 9: A B A 10: B A A Pattern seems like a diagonal bouncing? Let's map B positions in output: rows where B appears: row1 col2, row2 col1, row3 col2, row4 col3, row5 col2, row6 col1, row7 col2, row8 col3, row9 col2, row10 col1. So B moves like a zigzag: starting at bottom-left? Input B at (10,1). Output row10 col1 is B (matches). Then moving upward each row, B moves right one column each step until hits right wall (col3) then bounce left. Let's simulate: start at row10 col1 direction up-right? Actually moving upward each row (decreasing row index). Starting at row10 col1, direction up-right (col+1). Row9 col2 B (yes). Row8 col3 B (yes). At right wall, bounce: direction up-left. Row7 col2 B (yes). Row6 col1 B (yes). At left wall bounce: direction up-right. Row5 col2 B (yes). Row4 col3 B (yes). Row3 col2 B (yes). Row2 col1 B (yes). Row1 col2 B (yes). So pattern matches. All other cells are A (azure). So rule: fill entire grid with azure (A) except trace a single blue (B) moving from the original B position upward each row, bouncing off left/right walls, like a ping-pong. Thus for test input: dimensions? Provided grid 10 rows, 5 columns. B at bottom-left (row10 col1). Need to produce output 10x5 with A everywhere except B trace. Let's simulate. Columns 1..5. Start at row10 col1. Direction up-right (col+1). We'll track row decreasing. Initialize col=1, dir=+1 (right). For each row from 10 down to 1: Row10: col1 B. Row9: col = 1+1=2 B. Row8: col = 2+1=3 B. Row7: col = 3+1=4 B. Row6: col = 4+1=5 B. At right wall (col=5). Next step will bounce: direction becomes -1. Row5: col = 5-1=4 B. Row4: col = 4-1=3 B. Row3: col = 3-1=2 B. Row2: col = 2-1=1 B. At left wall, bounce direction +1. Row1: col = 1+1=2 B. Thus B positions per row (top to bottom): Row1 col2 Row2 col1 Row3 col2 Row4 col3 Row5 col4 Row6 col5 Row7 col4 Row8 col3 Row9 col2 Row10 col1 All other cells A. Now produce output grid rows top to bottom, each row 5 chars separated by spaces. Row1: col1 A, col2 B, col3 A, col4 A, col5 A => A B A A A Row2: B A A A A Row3: A B A A A Row4: A A B A A Row5: A A A B A Row6: A A A A B Row7: A A A B A Row8: A A B A A Row9: A B A A A Row10: B A A A A Check pattern symmetrical. Now produce answer block.
"A single spotlight weaving across the stage as it rises on an invisible wire"
120b: k=1
See: A blacked-out stage with one blue spotlight pooled at the downstage-left corner.
Do: The spotlight ascends and sweeps laterally, reversing direction when it hits the wings. The stage wash fades to azure as the house lights come up, but the spotlight's blue beam marks one position per row of seats from orchestra to balcony.
Grid: Same stage dimensions. Azure wash everywhere, one blue spotlight per row.
We need to infer rule. Input is grid with black '.' everywhere except a single B at bottom left? In example 1 input: 10 rows, 3 columns. All '.' except last row first column B. Output is 10x3 grid with A and B pattern. Let's view output pattern: rows: 1: A B A 2: B A A 3: A B A 4: A A B 5: A B A 6: B A A 7: A B A 8: A A B 9: A B A 10: B A A Looks like a diagonal pattern of B moving across rows, maybe sweeping laterally, reversing direction when hits edge. Starting at row1 column2? Actually row1 col2 is B. Row2 col1 is B. Row3 col2 B. Row4 col3 B. Row5 col2 B. Row6 col1 B. Row7 col2 B. Row8 col3 B. Row9 col2 B. Row10 col1 B. So pattern: B moves left-right across columns 1-3, one per row, like a "spotlight" moving laterally, reversing at edges. Starting position? Input had B at bottom left (row10 col1). That is the starting point? The description: spotlight ascends (upwards) and sweeps laterally, reversing direction when hits wings. So starting at bottom left, moving up each row, while also moving horizontally each step? Actually each row has exactly one B. The column changes according to a bouncing pattern: columns sequence for rows from bottom to top? Let's list rows bottom to top (row10 to row1). Input bottom row has B at col1. Output bottom row (row10) B at col1 (matches). Row9 (one up) B at col2. Row8 B at col3. Row7 B at col2. Row6 B at col1. Row5 B at col2. Row4 B at col3. Row3 B at col2. Row2 B at col1. Row1 B at col2. So moving up, column increments until edge (col3) then decrements, etc. Starting direction to the right (since from col1 to col2). So rule: given a grid with a single B at some position (likely bottom row?), produce output where all cells become A (azure) except a single B per row forming a bouncing horizontal line moving up from the original B position, with direction initially to the right (if possible) else left? Also maybe if B not at bottom? But test input: 10 rows, 5 columns, B at bottom left (row10 col1). So we need to generate pattern across 5 columns. We need to produce 10x5 grid with A everywhere except B positions per row following bounce pattern across columns 1..5. Let's simulate: start at row10 col1. Direction initially to the right (+1). For each step moving up one row, column = previous column + direction. If column reaches 5 (right edge) then direction flips to -1 after placing B at edge? In example with 3 columns, sequence from bottom: 1,2,3,2,1,2,3,2,1,2 (10 rows). That's bounce pattern length 4? Actually pattern period 4: 1,2,3,2 then repeat. Starting at 1 moving right. So algorithm works. Now for 5 columns, bounce pattern would be: 1,2,3,4,5,4,3,2,1,2,... etc. Need 10 rows. Starting at row10 col1. Let's generate upward rows (row10 to row1). We'll produce list: Row10 (bottom): col1 Row9: col2 Row8: col3 Row7: col4 Row6: col5 Row5: col4 Row4: col3 Row3: col2 Row2: col1 Row1: col2 That's 10 rows. So output grid rows from top (row1) to bottom (row10) will be: Row1 col2 B, others A. Row2 col1 B. Row3 ... [678 chars truncated]
"A vine climbing a trellis, weaving left and right between the posts"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A bare black trellis frame with a single blue bud planted at the bottom-left post.
Do: The vine grows upward one row at a time, angling diagonally and reversing when it reaches an edge post. The trellis wood weathers to azure in the growing season, while the vine's blue flowers bloom at exactly one lattice point per row.
Grid: Same trellis frame. Azure wood with one blue bloom per row.
See: The input is a 15×15 grid containing single-character color codes. In the top-left corner there is a distinctive cross or L-shaped structure made of X cells: the entire fourth row (row 3) is X X X X, and the entire fourth column (column 3) is X for rows 0 through 3. This creates a 4×4 region where row 3 and column 3 are all X, leaving a 3×3 sub-grid of non-X colored cells in rows 0–2, columns 0–2. This 3×3 sub-grid is the 'key pattern.' Somewhere else in the grid, a copy of this exact 3×3 pattern of colors exists at another location.
Do: 1. Extract the 3×3 key pattern from the top-left corner of the grid (rows 0–2, columns 0–2 — the non-X portion of the cross structure). 2. Search the rest of the grid for a 3×3 region that exactly matches this key pattern, cell by cell. 3. Once found, draw a 5×5 rectangular border of X cells centered on that 3×3 region. That is, if the matching 3×3 occupies rows r to r+2 and columns c to c+2, replace the border cells of the 5×5 rectangle spanning rows (r−1) to (r+3) and columns (c−1) to (c+3) with X. Specifically, the top and bottom rows of the 5×5 rectangle become all X, and the leftmost and rightmost columns of the three middle rows become X. The interior 3×3 cells (the matched pattern) remain unchanged. All other cells in the grid remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid is 15×15. It uses the standard ARC color palette (0–9) rendered as single characters: .=black, B=blue, R=red, G=green, Y=yellow, X=grey, M=magenta, O=orange, A=azure, W=maroon. The grid has no uniform background color; cells contain a variety of colors. The top-left 4×4 region always contains the cross template (row 3 all X, column 3 all X for rows 0–3). The output grid has the same dimensions as the input; the only change is the addition of the 5×5 X-border around the located pattern.
"A wanted poster leads bounty hunters to fence in the fugitive."
120b: k=1
See: In the top-left corner of the grid, a grey stone wall forms an L-shaped jail—bars running across the fourth row and down the fourth column. Locked behind those bars sits a 3×3 'mugshot' of colored suspects. Somewhere out in the wider grid, those same three-by-three suspects are hiding in plain sight among the crowd, wearing identical colors in the same arrangement.
Do: The sheriff studies the mugshot pinned to the jailhouse wall, then rides out into the grid to hunt for the fugitives. When the matching trio is found—same faces, same positions—the posse erects a grey stone fence around them: a 5×5 perimeter of X-bars that encircles the hideout one cell out in every direction. The fugitives inside remain untouched, but the fence announces they've been caught. Nothing else in the town changes—only the fence is new.
Grid: The town is a 15×15square of colored buildings. Grey (X) is the material of walls, bars, and fences. The jailhouse always occupies the top-left four rows and four columns, with its signature cross of grey bars. Every other color is a civilian going about their day. After the capture, the grid looks the same except for the new rectangular grey fence surrounding the discovered hideout.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output differ only in certain area: In example, there is a 5x5 grey X fence added around a matching 3x3 pattern that appears both in jail (top-left 4x4 cross) and elsewhere. Let's examine example 1. Input grid 15x15. The jail is top-left 4x4 with grey bars: rows 0-3, cols 0-3? Actually description: "grey stone wall forms an L-shaped jail—bars running across the fourth row and down the fourth column." So row index 3 (fourth row) all X across columns 0-3? And column index 3 (fourth column) all X down rows 0-3. In example input, we see first rows: Row0: G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . . Indices: col3 is X, col8 is X? Wait there is X at col3 and col8. But jail only first 4 columns? Actually row0 col3 X matches vertical bar. Row1 col3 X also. Row2 col3 X. Row3 row3 is X X X X (four X across). Indeed row3 (fourth row) columns 0-3 are X. So jail is 4x4 L shape: column 3 rows 0-3 X, row 3 columns 0-3 X. Now inside the top-left 3x3 (rows0-2, cols0-2) there is a 3x3 pattern of colors (the mugshot). Let's extract from example input: Rows0-2, Col0-2: Row0: G Y . Row1: . . Y Row2: . A G That's the 3x3 pattern. Now elsewhere in grid there is same 3x3 pattern somewhere else. Need to locate. In output, they added a 5x5 X fence around that location (one cell border). Let's find where X's added. Compare input vs output differences. Look at output rows 8-12 maybe. In output row8 (index8): "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" In input row8: "B . . . B . . . . . O . . . G" So at row8, columns 5-9 become X's (5 X's). That's part of fence. Row9 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" So X at col5 and col9. Row10 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output row10: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" X at col5 and col9. Row11 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output row11: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" X at col5 and col9. Row12 input: ". W . . R . . . . . . . B M" Output row12: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" X at col5-9. Thus fence is a 5x5 block of X covering rows8-12, cols5-9. Inside that block, the original 3x3 pattern should be at rows9-11, cols6-8? Let's check those cells: Rows9-11, cols6-8 (center 3x3): Row9 col6-8: G Y . (from output) Actually row9: "... X G Y . X ..." Wait row9 after fence: columns: let's index: col0 B,1 .,2 .,3 B? Wait row9 is ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". Let's map indices: 0 .,1 .,2 B,3 R,4 .,5 X,6 G,7 Y,8 .,9 X,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 R,14 W. So center 3x3 (rows9-11, cols6-8) = rows9: G Y . ; row10: . . Y? Wait row10: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y". Indices: 0 .,1 W,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 X,6 .,7 .,8 Y,9 X,10 .,11 M,12 .,13 A,14 Y. So cols6-8: col6 ., col7 ., col8 Y. Row11: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O": indices: 0 O,1 O,2 M,3 .,4 .,5 X,6 .,7 A,8 G,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 A,13 R,14 O. So cols6-8: ., A, G. Thus the 3x3 inside fence is: Row9: G Y . Row10: . . Y Row11: . A G Which matches the mugshot pattern exactly (G Y ., . . Y, . A G). Yes. Thus rule: ... [6958 chars truncated]
"A mother cell's nucleus carries the genetic signature. When the daughter cell bearing the same DNA is found in the tissue, the immune system encapsulates it in a membrane."
120b: fail
See: A tissue sample of colored cells. One cell cluster near the origin has its genetic code framed by a structural scaffold. Somewhere in the organism, a matching genetic sequence hides among the noise.
Do: Read the genetic signature from the scaffolded origin. Scan the tissue for the identical sequence. When found, the immune response walls it off with a containment membrane, leaving the interior genes untouched.
Grid: 15x15 grid of single-character color codes. The scaffold is made of X cells forming a cross in the top-left region. The membrane is also built from X cells surrounding the matched cluster.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. In example1, input and output differ: some region changed to X (grey) forming cross around a cluster? Let's compare. I'll copy input1 first few rows? Actually we have both. Let's compute differences. I'll mark coordinates (row, col) 0-index. We need to see where X's appear in output but not in input, and vice versa. From example1 input row0: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." output row0: same except maybe? Actually output row0: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." identical. So no change. Row1 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." output row1: same. Row2 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" output row2: same. Row3 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." output row3: same. Row4 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." output row4: same. Row5 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." output row5: same. Row6 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." output row6: same. Row7 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" output row7: same. Row8 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" output row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So row8 columns 5-9 changed to X's (positions 5,6,7,8,9). Input had ". G O . .". Actually row8 input: indices:0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 G,7 O,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G. Output row8: indices 5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X. So a horizontal line of X's length 5 starting at col5. Row9 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" output row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col5 (0-index) originally W becomes X. col9 originally . becomes X. So X at col5 and col9. Row10 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col5 .? Actually input col5 '.'? Let's index: row10: 0 .,1 W,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 .,11 M,12 .,13 A,14 Y. Output: col5 X (was .), col9 X (was .). So X at col5 and col9. Row11 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col5 . -> X, col9 . -> X. Row12 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col5 . -> X, col6 . -> X, col7 . -> X, col8 . -> X, col9 . -> X (five X's). So horizontal line length5 starting at col5. Row13 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row14 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." output same. So pattern: a region of X's appears forming a rectangle? Let's map coordinates of X added: rows8-12, columns5-9 maybe forming a 5x5 block? Let's see: Rows8-12 inclusive (5 rows) and columns5-9 inclusive (5 columns) become X, except some cells originally had other colors (like row8 col6 G, col7 O, col8 ., col9 .). In output they become X, overwriting original colors (including G,O). Row9 col5 originally W becomes X, col9 originally . becomes X. Row10 col5 ., col9 . become X. Row11 col5 ., col9 . become X. Row12 col5-9 all become X (overwrites .). So indeed a 5x5 square of X placed at rows8-12, cols5-9. What determines location and si ... [9342 chars truncated]
"A constellation template etched into the observatory's cornerstone is matched against the night sky. When the same star pattern is found, the astronomer draws a finder-scope reticle around it."
120b: fail
See: A star field of colored points. In one corner, a small constellation is bordered by instrument markings. The same stellar arrangement appears elsewhere in the sky.
Do: Read the constellation from the instrument corner. Scan the sky for the matching star pattern. Overlay a finder-scope reticle around the match, leaving the stars inside unchanged.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Instrument markings and reticle borders are X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output differ: seems a region (instrument corner) is a pattern with X border. In output, that pattern is overlaid elsewhere, and X border placed around match, leaving interior unchanged. Also original X border maybe removed? Let's compare example 1 input vs output. I'll copy first few rows. Input row1: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row1: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Same. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So row9 changed: after B . . . B there were ". G O . . . O . . G". In output, after B . . . B we have "X X X X X . O . . G". So a block of X's inserted. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." So modifications occur rows 9-13 columns around some region. Looks like a 5x5 block of X's placed around a matching pattern. We need to locate "instrument corner" pattern. In description: "instrument markings and reticle borders are X cells." So the pattern includes X border around a subgrid (the constellation). In input, there is a small region with X border? Let's locate X's in input that form a rectangle. In example input, there are many X's scattered. At top left, row1 col4 is X, row1 col9 X, row2 col4 X, row2 col... etc. But there is a region of X's forming a rectangle maybe rows4-8 columns1-4? Actually rows4-5 have "X X X X" at start. That's a row of four X's. Row4: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M .". Row5: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . .". So not rectangle. But later rows9-13 we see X's inserted in output but not in input. So the rule: find a pattern elsewhere that matches a region that is currently not X, then overlay X border around it. Specifically, there is a pattern of colors (non-X) that appears twice: one with X border (instrument) and another without. The output adds X border around the second occurrence, leaving interior unchanged. Thus we need to locate the "instrument corner" pattern in input: a region that includes X border. Then find another region with same interior pattern (colors) but without X border. Then add X border around that region. In example, the instrument pattern likely is at top-left? Let's examine rows1-5 columns? Look for a rectangle of X border with interior pattern of colors. Search: In input rows1-5 columns? Row1 col4 X, row1 col9 X. Not rectangle. Maybe the instrument pattern is a 5x5 block of X's? In input rows9-13 columns? Actually output added ... [9117 chars truncated]
"The harbor master's chart has a signal-flag pattern pinned to the wharf corner. When a vessel flying that same pattern is spotted in the open water, the coast guard deploys a boom perimeter."
120b: fail
See: An ocean chart with colored markers. Near the wharf, a small flag pattern is enclosed by dock pilings. The same flag arrangement appears on the open water.
Do: Read the signal flags from the wharf. Scan the water for the matching flag arrangement. Deploy a containment boom around that vessel, leaving the flags inside untouched.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Dock pilings and containment booms are X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Compare input and output of example 1. Let's write them side by side to see changes. I'll copy input grid (15x15). Let's index rows. Input1 Row1: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output1 Row1: same? "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Row1 unchanged. Row2 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Output row2: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." unchanged. Row3 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Output row3: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" unchanged. Row4 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Output row4: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." unchanged. Row5 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Output row5 same. Row6 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Output row6 same. Row7 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Output row7 same. Row8 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Output row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So changes: positions 6-10? Let's count columns 1-15. Row9 input columns: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So columns 6-10 turned to X (grey). In input they were ". G O . ." (col6 .,7 G,8 O,9 .,10 .). So a contiguous block of X inserted covering columns 6-10 inclusive (5 cells). Row9 originally had a pattern maybe matching something from earlier rows (wharf). Let's see other rows changed. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: column6? Let's map columns. Input row10: 1 . 2 . 3 B 4 R 5 . 6 W 7 G 8 Y 9 . 10 . 11 B 12 . 13 . 14 R 15 W Output row10: 1 . 2 . 3 B 4 R 5 . 6 X 7 G 8 Y 9 . 10 X 11 B 12 . 13 . 14 R 15 W So column6 changed from W to X, column10 changed from . to X. So X's placed at positions aligning with something. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output row11: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: column6 from . to X, column10 from . to X. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: column6 from . to X, column10 from . to X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: columns6-10 become X (col6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .) all X. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. So pattern: a rectangular region of X's placed somewhere rows 9-13 columns 6-10, forming a 5x5 block? Let's see rows 9-13 inclusive (5 rows) and columns 6-10 inclusive (5 columns) all X except some cells originally had other colors that remain? Actually row9 col7 originally G changed to X, col8 O changed to X. So they were overwritten. Row10 col6 W changed to X, col10 . changed to X. Row11 col6 . to X, col10 . to X. Row12 col6 . to X, col10 . to X. Row13 col6-10 all . changed to X. Thus a 5x5 block of X placed over region rows ... [8979 chars truncated]
"A reference signal is etched into the calibration corner of the circuit board. When the same signal pattern appears on a distant trace, the engineer solders a shielding cage around it."
120b: fail
See: A circuit board of colored components. In the calibration corner, a small pattern is enclosed by ground traces. The same component arrangement appears elsewhere on the board.
Do: Read the reference pattern from the calibration corner. Locate the matching component arrangement on the board. Solder a shielding cage around it, preserving the components inside.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Ground traces and shielding cages are X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Compare input and output of example 1. Let's write them side by side to see changes. I'll copy first few rows. Row1 input: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Row1 output same: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." No change. Row2 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Output same. Row3 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Output same. Row4 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Output same. Row5 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Output same. Row6 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Output same. Row7 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Output same. Row8 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Output same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So changes start row9. Row9 columns? Let's index columns 1-15. Row9 input: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So a block of X's from col6 to col10 inserted, replacing original cells (col6 '.'; col7 G; col8 O; col9 '.'; col10 '.' ), now all X except col11 remains '.'. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6 was W becomes X? Wait col6 input W, output X. col9 '.' becomes '.'? Actually output col9 '.'? Let's see: output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". So col6 X, col9 '.' unchanged, col10 X (was '.'), col? Let's map: columns: 1 . 2 . 3 B 4 R 5 . 6 W -> X 7 G unchanged 8 Y unchanged 9 . unchanged 10 . -> X 11 B unchanged 12 . unchanged 13 . unchanged 14 R unchanged 15 W unchanged Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 '.'? Actually col6 '.' becomes X? Wait column list: col1 .,2 W,3 .,4 .,5 A,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 Y,10 .,11 .,12 M,13 .,14 A,15 Y. Output: col6 X, col10 X. So inserted X at col6 and col10. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col10 '.' -> X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col7 Y -> X, col8 . -> X, col9 . -> X, col10 . -> X, col11 . -> X? Wait output shows after col10 X, then '.'? Let's list: output row13: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M". So columns: 1 .,2 W,3 .,4 .,5 R,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 X,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 B,15 M. So X from col6 to col10 inclusive, replacing original Y at col7 and others. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. So pattern: a rectangular region of X's inserted covering rows 9-13 and columns 6-10 (maybe). Let's see rows 9-13 inclusive, columns 6-10 inclusive become X, except some cells already X maybe remain X. In original, there were some X's elsewhere (like row4 etc). The region seems to correspond to a "matching compo ... [10385 chars truncated]
"A sacred rune is carved into the temple's foundation stone. When the same rune manifests in the wild mosaic of the world, the gods raise a stone circle to consecrate the site."
120b: fail
See: A mosaic of colored symbols. In the foundation corner, a small rune is enclosed by divine markers. The same rune appears hidden among the scattered symbols elsewhere.
Do: Decipher the rune from the foundation. Search the mosaic for its twin. Raise a stone circle around the twin, leaving the sacred symbols inside untouched.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Divine markers and stone circles are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. Input and output differ: seems some X (grey) cells are added forming a rectangle (stone circle) around a "twin rune". The description: "foundation corner, a small rune is enclosed by divine markers. The same rune appears hidden among the scattered symbols elsewhere. Raise a stone circle around the twin, leaving the sacred symbols inside untouched. Grid details: 15x15 grid. Divine markers and stone circles are X cells." So X cells are markers and circles. In input, there are some X cells already (maybe the "foundation corner" rune). In output, we see additional X cells forming a rectangle around a region containing the twin rune. Let's examine Example1. Compare input vs output. I'll copy first few rows of input vs output. Row1 input: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row1: same: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." No change. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So row9 columns 6-10 changed to X (positions?). Let's index columns 1-15. Row9 input columns: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So a block of X from col6 to col10 (5 cells) inserted, replacing original cells (including G at col7, O at col8). So they turned a region into X, but left some interior? Actually they replaced everything with X except maybe some interior? Let's see other rows. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6 changed from W to X, col10 changed from . to X. So X's placed at col6 and col10, but not all interior. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 from . to X, col10 from . to X. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 from . to X, col10 from . to X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6-10 become X (col6 X, col7 X, col8 X, col9 X, col10 X). So row13 similar to row9. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. Thus the X rectangle appears rows 9-13, columns 6-10 (5x5 block). In input, some X cells already existed? Let's check original X positions in that area. Input rows 9-13 columns 6-10: Row9 col6 .,7 G,8 O,9 .,10 . Row10 col6 W,7 G,8 Y,9 .,10 . Row11 col6 .,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 . Row12 col6 .,7 .,8 G,9 .,10 . Row13 col6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 .,10 . So no X originally there. The rectangle of X added encloses something? The "twin rune" maybe a pattern of non-X cells inside? Let's see interior of rectangle after transformation: In output, interior cells (rows 10-12, cols7- ... [10099 chars truncated]
"The choreographer's notation in the corner of the floor shows a pas de trois arrangement. When the dancers elsewhere on the floor fall into that same formation, a spotlight ring descends."
120b: fail
See: A dance floor with colored performers. In the corner, a small formation is marked off by floor tape. The same arrangement of dancers appears spontaneously elsewhere on the floor.
Do: Learn the formation from the taped corner. Watch for the matching arrangement on the open floor. Lower a spotlight ring around it, framing the formation while leaving the dancers inside in place.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Floor tape and spotlight rings are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. In example1, input and output differ: some region replaced with X (grey) forming a rectangle? Let's compare. I'll copy input1 rows (I'll index 0-14). Input1 row0: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row0 same? "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." identical. Row1 same. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So columns 5-9 (0-index) changed to X. Row8 originally had ". . G O . . . . O . . G"? Wait need to map. Let's write row8 indices: 0 B,1 space? Actually row8: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Indices:0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 G,7 O,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G. Output row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" Indices:0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G. So a block of X from col5 to col9 inclusive (5 cells) inserted, replacing original cells (.,G,O,.,.)? Actually original at col5 '.'; col6 G; col7 O; col8 '.'; col9 '.'; they become X. Row9 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col5? Let's index: 0 .,1 .,2 B,3 R,4 .,5 W,6 G,7 Y,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 R,14 W. Output: col5 becomes X (instead of W). col9 becomes X (instead of .). So X inserted at col5 and col9. Row10 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col5 becomes X (was .), col9 becomes X (was .). So X at same columns as previous row? Row9 had X at col5 and col9. Row10 also. Row11 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col5 becomes X (was .), col9 becomes X (was .). So pattern. Row12 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col5-9 become X (5 cells). Row12 originally: col5 '.';6 Y;7 .;8 .;9 .; they become X. Row13 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row14 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. Observation: The region of X forms a rectangle? Let's see rows 8-12 columns 5-9 maybe. Row8 had X from 5-9 (5 cells). Row9 had X at 5 and 9 only (edges). Row10 same. Row11 same. Row12 X from 5-9. So shape is a hollow rectangle (border X) with interior maybe not X? Actually rows 9-11 have X only at columns 5 and 9 (vertical edges). Row8 and Row12 have full horizontal edges. So it's a rectangle border of X covering rows 8-12 and cols 5-9. Inside (rows 9-11, cols 6-8) remain original (except some were overwritten? Row9 col6 G unchanged, col7 Y unchanged, col8 . unchanged). Row10 col6 . unchanged, col7 . unchanged, col8 Y unchanged? Wait row10 col8 Y? Actually row10 col8 Y originally? Row10: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" col8 is Y (index 8). Output row10 col8 Y unchanged. Row11 col8 G unchanged. So interior unchanged. Thus rule: Find a pattern (formation) in corner (taped co ... [9717 chars truncated]
"A mineral signature in the bedrock corner of the survey map is catalogued. When the same crystalline pattern surfaces in a distant stratum, geologists stake a sample perimeter around it."
120b: fail
See: A geological survey of colored mineral deposits. In the bedrock corner, a small crystal pattern is bounded by fault lines. The same mineral arrangement appears in a distant part of the survey.
Do: Catalogue the crystal pattern from the faulted corner. Scan the survey for the matching mineral arrangement. Stake a sample perimeter around the discovery, leaving the minerals inside undisturbed.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Fault lines and sample perimeters are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Observations: In each example, output seems to copy input but with modifications: a rectangular region (bounded by X cells) is replaced with X's? Let's examine Example1. Input vs output differences: Look at rows where changes occur. Compare row9 (index starting 1). Input row9: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So a block of X's inserted from column6 to column10? Let's map coordinates. Row9 col6 originally '.' becomes X, col7 'G' becomes X, col8 'O' becomes X, col9 '.' becomes X, col10 '.' becomes X. So a 5x? region of X's. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6 '.'? Wait col6 in input is 'W', output col6 'X' (changed). col9 '.' becomes '.'? Actually col9 '.' stays '.'? Let's see: output col9 '.'? It shows ". X"? Wait row10 output: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". So columns: 1 '.';2 '.';3 B;4 R;5 '.';6 X;7 G;8 Y;9 '.';10 X;11 B;12 '.';13 '.';14 R;15 W. So col6 changed from W to X, col10 changed from '.' to X. So X's placed forming a shape. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 '.' becomes X, col10 '.' becomes X. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col10 '.' -> X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col7 'Y' -> X, col8 '.' -> X, col9 '.' -> X, col10 '.' -> X. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. So the region of X's seems to be a rectangle from rows 9-13 and columns 6-10 (inclusive). Indeed rows 9-13 (5 rows) and cols 6-10 (5 columns) become X, except some cells originally X remain X? In input, there were already X's elsewhere (like row1 col4 is X). Those remain unchanged. Thus rule: Find a pattern (a "template") in a corner (faulted corner) and locate matching pattern elsewhere, then overlay X's (sample perimeter) around that matching region? Let's examine example1: The "corner" pattern maybe a 5x5 block of X's? In input, top-left corner? Let's look at input rows1-5 columns? Actually there is a block of X's in rows1-4 columns1-4? Input rows1-4 columns1-4: row1: G Y . X ; row2: . . Y X ; row3: . A G X ; row4: X X X X . That's a shape: a 4x4 region where the rightmost column is X's, and bottom row all X's. That's like a corner of X's forming an L shape (a filled rectangle of X's? Actually rows1-4 cols1-4: pattern: Row1: G Y . X Row2: . . Y X Row3: . A G X Row4: X X X X So the X's form a border: rightmost column all X, bottom row all X, forming a corner shape (like a filled L). This is the "fault lines" bounding a small crystal pattern (the non-X cells inside). The pattern inside (the "crystal") is the 3x3 area top-left o ... [10179 chars truncated]
"The chef stamps a cookie cutter into the corner of the dough to learn the pattern, then hunts the baking sheet for a matching cluster of sprinkles and rings it with fondant."
120b: fail
See: A baking sheet of colorful sprinkles. In one corner, a mold defines a small pattern of flavors. Elsewhere, the same arrangement of flavors appears by coincidence among the scattered toppings.
Do: Lift the flavor pattern from the corner mold. Search the sheet for a matching arrangement. Pipe a fondant border around the matching cluster, leaving the sprinkles inside untouched.
Grid: 15x15 grid. The mold is formed by X cells in the top-left. The fondant border is a rectangle of X cells around the discovered match.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output differ: look at example. Compare input vs output. Identify region changed: In output, there is a rectangle of X (grey) added around a matching pattern found elsewhere. We need to locate "mold" in top-left corner formed by X cells. In example input, top-left corner has a 4x? shape of X's? Let's view first few rows of example input (15x15). I'll write coordinates. Row0: G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . . Row1: . . Y X A A . . . . O G G . . Row2: . A G X . . X . . B . R . . W Row3: X X X X M B . W . . G G . M . Row4: G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . . Row5: . Y . . X X M . . . . . B X . Row6: . R B . . . . . Y W . W . . . Row7: . . . . A . . . O R R . . W A Row8: B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G Row9: . . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W Row10: . W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y Row11: O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O Row12: . W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M Row13: . . . . . . . G . . Y . W A . Row14: Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A . Output differences: Let's compare rows where X rectangle appears. Output row8 (index8): B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G In input row8: B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G So a rectangle of X's from columns? Let's index columns 0-14. Row8 input: col0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 G,7 O,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G Output row8: col0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G So X's placed columns5-9 (5 cells) row8. Row9 input: . . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W Output row9: . . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W So X at col5 and col9. Row10 input: . W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y Output: . W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y X at col5 and col9. Row11 input: O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O Output: O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O X at col5 and col9. Row12 input: . W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M Output: . W . . R X X X X X . . . B M X at col5-9. Thus rectangle rows8-12, cols5-9 filled with X, border? Actually interior also X, seems full rectangle of X (5x5). The rectangle corresponds to pattern matching? The "mold" is top-left corner X cells. Let's see top-left corner region of X's in input: rows0-3 columns? Row0 col3 is X. Row1 col3 X. Row2 col3 X. Row3 col0-3 are X X X X. So shape maybe a 4x4 L? Actually rows0-2 have single X at column3. Row3 has four X's at columns0-3. That's like a shape of a "corner" (like a 4x4 block missing top rows except column3). That's the mold pattern. Now we need to find same arrangement elsewhere: In output, rectangle of X's is 5x5? Wait mold is 4x4? Let's examine pattern: The rectangle placed is 5x5 of X's, not same shape. But maybe the mold defines the rectangle size: The mold is a rectangle of X's? Let's examine top-left region rows0-3 cols0-3: Rows0-3, cols0-3: Row0: G Y . X Row1: . . Y X Row2: . A G X Row3: X X X X So the X's form a shape: a column of X at col3 rows0-3, plus row3 full X across cols0-3. That's like an L shape (a corner). This shape appears elsewhere: In output, rows8-12 cols5-9 have full X rectangle (5x5). That's not L shape. Wait maybe the rectangle border is X's ... [9840 chars truncated]
"A leitmotif is inscribed in the margin of the score. When the orchestra unknowingly reprises it in a later passage, the conductor draws a fermata box around the recurrence."
120b: fail
See: A colorful score of notes scattered across a page. In the margin, a short motif is set apart by bar lines. Somewhere deeper in the composition, the same sequence of notes appears again.
Do: Learn the motif from the marginal notation. Find where it recurs in the body of the score. Frame that recurrence with held-note borders, leaving the melody inside intact.
Grid: 15x15 character grid. Bar lines are X cells forming cross-shaped scaffolding. The fermata box is a rectangular X-border around the matched passage.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. Input and output differ: seems to add X border around a region that matches a motif from margin. In description: marginal motif is short sequence set apart by bar lines. In grid, bar lines are X cells forming cross-shaped scaffolding. The motif appears in margin (maybe first column/row?). Then find same sequence elsewhere and frame with X border rectangle. Look at Example1: Compare input vs output. Let's locate differences. I'll copy first few rows of input vs output. Row1 input: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row1: same? "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." identical. Row2 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Output row2: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." same. Row3 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Output row3 same. Row4 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Output row4 same. Row5 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Output row5 same. Row6 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Output row6 same. Row7 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Output row7 same. Row8 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Output row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So row9 changed: columns 6-10 become X's (positions?). Let's index columns 1-15. Row9 input columns: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So a horizontal line of X from col6 to col10 inserted, replacing original cells (., G, O, ., .). So a rectangle border maybe. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6 becomes X (was W), col10 becomes X (was .). So vertical X at column6? Actually row10 col6 originally W now X. Row10 col10 originally . now X. So seems rectangle border around region rows9-13? Let's see. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output row11: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 X (was .), col10 X (was .). So same columns. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 X (was .), col10 X (was .). Row12 col6 originally . now X, col10 originally . now X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6 X (was .), col7 X (was .), col8 X (was .), col9 X (was .), col10 X (was .). So row13 columns6-10 become X. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output same. Thus rectangle border of X's from rows9-13, columns6-10. The border includes top row (row9) columns6-10 all X, bottom row (row13) columns6-10 all X, left column (col6) rows9-13 X, right column (col10) rows9-13 X. Inside region (rows10-12, cols7-9) remain original (some unchanged). Indeed inside region we have original values: row10 col7 G, col8 Y, col9 . ; row11 col7 ., col8 ., col9 Y ; row12 ... [10218 chars truncated]
"The referee memorizes a formation from the playbook pinned in the corner. When the same formation appears on the field, the ref throws down boundary cones."
120b: fail
See: A playing field with colored jerseys scattered across it. In the corner, a clipboard shows a specific small formation bracketed by sideline markers. Somewhere on the field, players have unknowingly arranged themselves in the same pattern.
Do: Study the formation on the clipboard. Scan the field for the matching arrangement of jerseys. Set up boundary cones in a rectangle around that formation, leaving the players inside undisturbed.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Sideline markers and boundary cones are both X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Observations: Input and output grids same size 15x15. The transformation seems to locate a pattern (clipboard) and draw rectangle of X (grey) around it, leaving interior unchanged. In examples, they added X rectangle around a region that matches a pattern somewhere else? Let's analyze. In Example1, compare input vs output. Many cells changed: In output, there are new X's forming a rectangle somewhere. Let's locate rectangle: In output rows 9-13 (0-index?). Let's index rows 0-14. I'll write rows of output example1 (I'll copy): Row0: G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . . Row1: . . Y X A A . . . . O G G . . Row2: . A G X . . X . . B . R . . W Row3: X X X X M B . W . . G G . M . Row4: G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . . Row5: . Y . . X X M . . . . . B X . Row6: . R B . . . . . Y W . W . . . Row7: . . . . A . . . O R R . . W A Row8: B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G Row9: . . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W Row10: . W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y Row11: O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O Row12: . W . . R X X X X X . . . B M Row13: . . . . . . . G . . Y . W A . Row14: Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A . We see a rectangle of X's from rows8-12 and columns? Let's locate: Row8 has "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G". So columns 5-9 are X (0-index). Row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" => X at col5 and col9. Row10: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" => X at col5 and col9. Row11: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" => X at col5 and col9. Row12: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" => X at cols5-9. So rectangle corners (rows8-12, cols5-9). Inside rectangle (rows9-11, cols6-8) are unchanged from input? Let's check input rows9-11 columns6-8. Input row9 (index9): ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" same as output except interior? Actually interior cells are columns6-8: col6=G, col7=Y, col8='.'? Wait row9 col8 is '.'? Let's count: row9 string: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". Indices:0 '.';1 '.';2 B;3 R;4 '.';5 X;6 G;7 Y;8 '.';9 X;10 B;11 '.';12 '.';13 R;14 W. So interior (col6-8) = G Y . . In output same. So rectangle just adds X border around region that already existed? The interior originally had some pattern maybe matches clipboard pattern. Now what is clipboard pattern? In description: "clipboard shows a specific small formation bracketed by sideline markers." In grid, X cells are sideline markers? Actually X are grey used for rectangle and also appear elsewhere as markers? In examples, there are many X's originally forming lines etc. The rectangle added uses X as boundary cones. So rule: Find a subgrid pattern that matches a given pattern (maybe a 5x5 pattern of X's forming a rectangle?) Wait the clipboard pattern likely is a 5x5 rectangle of X's with interior not X? Let's examine the pattern that appears elsewhere in grid unchanged. In example1, there is a region of X's already forming a rectangle? Look at rows3-7 columns0-4? Row3: X X X X M ... not rectangle. Another region: rows0-4 columns3? Not. Maybe the pattern is a 5x5 block of X's with a cross? Let ... [8179 chars truncated]
"A barometric fingerprint forms in the corner of the weather map. When the same pressure signature appears elsewhere, a storm wall crystallizes around it."
120b: fail
See: A weather map of varied atmospheric readings. In one corner, a distinctive small pressure pattern is bordered by frontal lines. The same pressure signature hides somewhere else on the map.
Do: Read the pressure fingerprint from the frontal-line corner. Locate its twin elsewhere on the map. Enclose the twin in a storm wall, preserving the interior readings.
Grid: 15x15 grid of color codes representing atmospheric data. Frontal lines and storm walls are both made of X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Input and output differences: compare. Let's write side by side first few rows. Row1 input: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row1: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Same unchanged. Row2 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Output row2: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Same. Row3 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Output row3 same. Row4 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Output row4 same. Row5 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Output row5 same. Row6 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Output row6 same. Row7 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Output row7 same. Row8 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Output row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So changes start row9. Row9 input had pattern: positions: let's index columns 1-15. Row9 input: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So columns 6-10 changed to X (grey). That's a horizontal line of X's length 5 starting at col6 to col10. In input there were . . G O . . .? Actually col6 '.' col7 G col8 O col9 '.' col10 '.' . So they replaced a region with X's. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6? Input col6 W, output col6 X (changed). col9 '.' unchanged? Wait output col9 '.'? Actually output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". Let's map columns: 1 . 2 . 3 B 4 R 5 . 6 X (was W) 7 G (same) 8 Y (same) 9 . 10 X (was .) 11 B (same) 12 . 13 . 14 R (same) 15 W (same) So X placed at col6 and col10. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 '.' -> X? Actually input col6 '.' output col6 X. col10 '.' -> X. So similar pattern. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col10 '.' -> X. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6 '.' -> X, col7 '.'? Actually input col7 '.'? Wait row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M". Let's index: 1 .,2 W,3 .,4 .,5 R,6 .,7 Y,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 .,14 B,15 M. Output row13: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M". So col6 X, col7 X, col8 X, col9 X, col10 X. So a block of X from col6-10, replacing ". Y . . ."? Actually original had Y at col7, but now replaced with X, losing Y. So interior replaced. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. Observation: The transformation seems to locate a pattern (the "pressure fingerprint") in a corner, then find its twin elsewhere, and enclose twin in X wall preserving interior? In example, the pattern appears in top-left corner? Let's examine input for a distinctive small pattern bordered ... [9154 chars truncated]
"A mosaic fragment preserved in the cornerstone reveals the original artisan's pattern. When the same fragment is discovered in a distant wall, restorers frame it with protective stonework."
120b: fail
See: A wall of colored tiles. The cornerstone region holds a small mosaic fragment bordered by structural beams. Somewhere in the broader wall, the same mosaic pattern appears unframed.
Do: Record the mosaic from the cornerstone. Search the wall for the matching tile arrangement. Build a protective stone frame around the discovered fragment, leaving the mosaic intact inside.
Grid: 15x15 character grid. Structural beams and protective frames are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. In example1, input and output differ: some region replaced with X frames around a pattern that matches a "cornerstone region". Let's locate. In example1 input, there is a small mosaic fragment "bordered by structural beams". The description: "cornerstone region holds a small mosaic fragment bordered by structural beams. Somewhere in the broader wall, the same mosaic pattern appears unframed." So we need to find the mosaic pattern in the corner region (maybe top-left?) and then locate its duplicate elsewhere, then surround that duplicate with X (grey) frame, leaving mosaic intact. Let's compare input vs output for example1 to see changes. I'll copy input rows with indices. Row0: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Row1: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Row2: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Row3: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Row4: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Row5: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Row6: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Row7: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Row8: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Row9: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Row10: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Row11: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Row12: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Row13: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Row14: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output rows: Row0 same as input. Row1 same. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" Row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Row10: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Row11: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Row12: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Row13: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Row14 same as input. So changes are in rows 8-12 columns around some region. Let's locate pattern. In input rows 8-12 columns 0-? Let's extract subgrid rows8-12, cols0-? (0-index). Input: Row8: col0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 G,7 O,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G Row9: . . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W Row10: . W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y Row11: O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O Row12: . W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M In output, rows8-12 changed to have X frames around something. Output rows8-12: Row8: B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G Row9: . . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W Row10: . W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y Row11: O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O Row12: . W . . R X X X X X . . . B M So we see a 5x5 block of X's (grey) forming a frame? Let's map coordinates. The X's appear in rows8-12 and columns5-9 maybe. Let's index columns 0-14. Row8: X at col5,6,7,8,9? Actually row8 output: after B . . . B (col0-4), then X X X X X (col5-9), then . at col10, O at 11, .12, .13, G14. So X's at cols5-9. Row9: pattern: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W". So X at col5 and col9. So vertical edges. Row10: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y": X at col5 and col9. Row11: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O": X at col5 and col9. Row12: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M": X at cols5-9 again. Thus a rectangular frame of X's: top row (row8) columns5- ... [8882 chars truncated]
"Intelligence decodes an insignia from a captured flag in the command post. When reconnaissance spots the same insignia on the battlefield, sappers dig a trench perimeter around the position."
120b: fail
See: A battlefield map with colored unit markers. In the command post corner, a captured insignia is bordered by fortification lines. The same insignia pattern appears among the scattered units elsewhere.
Do: Decode the insignia from the fortified corner. Locate the matching unit arrangement on the field. Dig a trench perimeter enclosing that position, leaving the units inside undisturbed.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Fortification lines and trench perimeters are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have 15x15 grids. In each example, output differs from input in certain region: a rectangle of X's (grey) placed around a pattern that matches a "insignia" located in corner fortified area. Observation Example1: Input vs Output differences: In output, many X's added forming a rectangle around a region that matches pattern from top-left corner? Let's compare. In Example1 input, top-left corner (maybe 4x4?) there is a pattern with X's forming a border? Let's view first few rows of input Example1: Row1: G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . . Row2: . . Y X A A . . . . O G G . . Row3: . A G X . . X . . B . R . . W Row4: X X X X M B . W . . G G . M . Row5: G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . . ... In output, many X's added forming rectangle around region starting at row9? Let's see output rows 9-14 changed. Output row9: B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G Row10: . . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W Row11: . W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y Row12: O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O Row13: . W . . R X X X X X . . . B M Row14: . . . . . . . G . . Y . W A . Row15: Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A . So rectangle of X's from rows9-13 columns6-10? Let's map coordinates (1-index). Row9 col6-col10 are X X X X X. Row10 col6 is X, col10 X. Row11 col6 X, col10 X. Row12 col6 X, col10 X. Row13 col6-col10 X X X X X. So rectangle 5x5 border of X's (filled border). Inside rectangle (rows10-12, cols7-9) contains original pattern? Let's see inside: rows10-12, cols7-9: Row10 col7 G, col8 Y, col9 . (original? Actually row10 col7 G, col8 Y, col9 .) Row11 col7 ., col8 ., col9 Y. Row12 col7 ., col8 A, col9 G. So interior is 3x3 pattern. Now, the "insignia" pattern likely is the 3x3 pattern that appears elsewhere (maybe top-left corner). Let's extract pattern from top-left corner region maybe rows1-3 cols1-3? That is: Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1: G Y . Row2: . . Y Row3: . A G That's a 3x3 pattern: G Y . . . Y . A G But interior of rectangle we saw is: Row10-12, cols7-9: G Y . . . Y . A G Exactly matches! So the rule: Find a 3x3 pattern that appears in the "fortified corner" (maybe top-left corner with X border). Then locate another occurrence of that pattern elsewhere in grid (maybe not overlapping). Then draw a rectangle of X's (border) around that occurrence, leaving interior unchanged. In Example1, the "fortified corner" is top-left corner where there is a border of X's? Actually top-left corner has X at (1,4) and (2,4) etc. Not a full border. But maybe the "insignia" is defined as a pattern that is adjacent to X's forming a border in corner. Let's examine: In Example1, the pattern appears at rows1-3 cols1-3, and there is an X at (1,4) and (2,4) and (3,4) and (4,1-4) etc forming a L shape? Actually there is a vertical line of X at column4 rows1-3, and a horizontal line of X at row4 columns1-4. That forms a corner shape (like a fortification). So the "corner" is a right-angle of X's forming a border around the pattern? The pattern is to the left and above ... [8521 chars truncated]
"The blocking diagram in the stage-left wing shows a precise arrangement of actors. When that tableau forms spontaneously during the scene, the lighting designer drops a spotlight frame around it."
120b: fail
See: A stage full of colorful performers. In the wings, a small blocking diagram is enclosed by set walls. Somewhere on stage, the performers have arranged themselves into that exact tableau.
Do: Study the blocking diagram from the wings. Watch for the matching arrangement on stage. Lower a rectangular spotlight frame around the tableau, illuminating only the border while the performers inside remain as they were.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Set walls and spotlight frames are X cells.
We need to infer rule from examples. Observations: Input and output same except some region changed: a rectangular frame of X's placed around a subgrid that matches a pattern (blocking diagram) somewhere else? Let's analyze. In Example1, compare input vs output. Look for differences. Let's compute manually. I'll copy first few rows. Row1 same? Input row1: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row1 identical. Row2 same. Row3 same. Row4 same. Row5 same. Row6 same. Row7 same. Row8 same. Row9 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row9: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So columns 6-10 changed to X's (positions?). Let's index columns 1-15. Row9 input columns: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 . 7 G 8 O 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G Output row9: 1 B 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 B 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 . 12 O 13 . 14 . 15 G So a horizontal line of X from col6 to col10 inserted, replacing original cells (., G, O, ., .). So a rectangle border maybe. Row10 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row10: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col6 becomes X (was W), col10 becomes X (was .). So border vertical lines? Let's see. Row11 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col6 X (was .), col10 X (was .). So vertical border. Row12 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col6 X (was .), col10 X (was .). So vertical. Row13 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col6-10 become X (was ., Y, ., ., .). So bottom border horizontal. Row14 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output same? Actually output row14: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row15 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output same. Thus rectangle from rows9-13, columns6-10 turned into X border, interior unchanged? Let's see interior cells (rows10-12, cols7-9) remain original: row10 col7 G, col8 Y, col9 . ; row11 col7 ., col8 Y, col9 . ; row12 col7 ., col8 G, col9 . . They remain unchanged. So rule: find a subgrid that matches a pattern (blocking diagram) somewhere else? The rectangle border is X's, interior unchanged. Now need to locate the "blocking diagram" in the wings (maybe a small pattern of X's in input). In example1, there is a block of X's somewhere else that matches the rectangle shape? Let's search input for a rectangle of X's (maybe 5x5?) In example1 input, there is a region of X's at rows4-5? Actually row4: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." That's a row of four X at start. Row5: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." has a single X at col6. Row6: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." has X X at col5-6 and X at col15. Row7: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." no X. Row8: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" none. Row9: no X. Row10: none. Row11: none. Row12: none. Row13: none. Row14: none. Row15: none. But there is a pattern of X's forming a rectangle? Let's examine rows4-8 columns? Actually rows4-8 columns1-4 have X's forming a 4x? Row4 col ... [10255 chars truncated]
"A seed packet in the corner of the garden shows the bloom arrangement. When that exact cluster of flowers sprouts wild elsewhere in the bed, the gardener builds a trellis frame around it."
120b: fail
See: A garden bed of various colored blooms. In the corner, a small arrangement is enclosed by wooden stakes. The same cluster pattern has sprouted spontaneously somewhere else in the garden.
Do: Note the bloom arrangement from the staked corner. Search the garden for the matching wild cluster. Erect a trellis frame around it, leaving the flowers inside undisturbed.
Grid: 15x15 grid. Stakes and trellis frames are X cells.
We need to infer rule from example. Compare input and output of example 1. Let's write them side by side to see differences. I'll label coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input row0: "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." Output row0: same? "G Y . X . . G . X A . O . . ." identical. Row1 input: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." Output row1: ". . Y X A A . . . . O G G . ." identical. Row2 input: ". A G X . . X . . B . R . . W" Output row2: same. Row3 input: "X X X X M B . W . . G G . M ." Output row3: same. Row4 input: "G O . . . X . . . . Y . . . ." Output row4: same. Row5 input: ". Y . . X X M . . . . . B X ." Output row5: same. Row6 input: ". R B . . . . . Y W . W . . ." Output row6: same. Row7 input: ". . . . A . . . O R R . . W A" Output row7: same. Row8 input: "B . . . B . G O . . . O . . G" Output row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So changes start at row8. Let's compare rows 8-13. Row8 input: columns: 0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 .,6 G,7 O,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G Output row8: "B . . . B X X X X X . O . . G" So columns 5-9 become X (grey). Specifically col5 was '.' becomes X, col6 was G becomes X, col7 O becomes X, col8 . becomes X, col9 . becomes X. col10 stays '.'? output col10 '.'? Actually output shows '.' at col10? Wait output row8: after the X's there is a space then '.'? Let's count: positions 0 B,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 B,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 .,11 O,12 .,13 .,14 G. Yes. Row9 input: ". . B R . W G Y . . B . . R W" Output row9: ". . B R . X G Y . X B . . R W" Changes: col5? input col5 W? Wait index: row9 col0 .,1 .,2 B,3 R,4 .,5 W,6 G,7 Y,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 .,12 .,13 R,14 W. Output: col5 becomes X (was W), col9 becomes X (was .). Also col8? remains .? output col8 '.' same. So X inserted at col5 and col9. Row10 input: ". W . . A . . . Y . . M . A Y" Output: ". W . . A X . . Y X . M . A Y" Changes: col5 becomes X (was .), col9 becomes X (was .). Also col? col? check: col5 index? Actually row10 col0 .,1 W,2 .,3 .,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 Y,9 .,10 .,11 M,12 .,13 A,14 Y. Output: col5 X, col9 X. Good. Row11 input: "O O M . . . . A G . . . A R O" Output: "O O M . . X . A G X . . A R O" Changes: col5 becomes X (was .), col9 becomes X (was .). Also col? col? col? col? col? col? also col? there is X at col5 and col9. Row12 input: ". W . . R . Y . . . . . . B M" Output: ". W . . R X X X X X . . . B M" Changes: col5 becomes X (was .), col6 Y becomes X, col7 . becomes X, col8 . becomes X, col9 . becomes X, col10 . becomes X? Wait output shows '.' at col10? Let's count: row12 output: positions:0 .,1 W,2 .,3 .,4 R,5 X,6 X,7 X,8 X,9 X,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 B,14 M. So X from col5-9 inclusive, col10 remains '.'. Row13 input: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." Output: ". . . . . . . G . . Y . W A ." No change. Row14 input: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." Output: "Y . . . W . B B O W . . . A ." No change. Observations: A rectangular region of X's appears in rows 8-12, columns 5-9 (some rows partially). It seems to be a frame (trellis) placed around a matching pattern ... [10444 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains two or three rectangular blocks of non-background cells, separated by borders of black (.) cells. Each block is composed of azure (A) cells forming a background within the block, with a small number of blue (B) and red (R) cells scattered among them.
Do: 1. Identify all distinct rectangular blocks of non-dot cells in the input grid. Blocks are separated from each other by rows or columns of dot cells. 2. For each block, count the number of red (R) cells it contains. 3. Select the block with the highest red cell count. 4. Extract that block exactly as it appears and output it.
Grid: The input grid is approximately 10x10 with black (.) cells serving as background and separators between blocks. Each block is a contiguous rectangle of non-dot cells. The output grid has the exact dimensions of the selected block, containing only the cells from that block with no surrounding dots.
"The hottest ember escapes the dying campfires"
120b: k=1
See: Scattered across the darkness like campfires in a valley, you see several glowing hearths — each a patch of pale azure coals with sparks of red flame and blue smoke drifting among them. The darkness between them is cold night air.
Do: Each campfire burns with a different intensity. Count the red-hot embers in each hearth — they are the true measure of its heat. The fire burning hottest, the one with the most living flame, refuses to die. Rescue it from the night and carry it forward whole.
Grid: The valley floor is dark (black). Each campfire is a compact rectangular bed of azure coals speckled with red embers and blue cinders. You must lift the hottest fire out intact — every coal, ember, and cinder in its exact arrangement — leaving the cold night behind.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10 with many colors. Output is 3x3 subgrid: A R R / R R B / R B A. So they extracted the "hottest fire": rectangular region (campfire) with azure (A) coals, red (R) embers, blue (B) cinders. Need to find region with most red count? Let's analyze example input to locate such region. Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows with indices 0-9. Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to find rectangular clusters of A,R,B maybe contiguous? Let's locate region that matches output 3x3: pattern: A R R R R B R B A Search in input. Look at rows7-9 columns? Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . If we take columns1-3? Row7 col1=A, col2=R, col3=R => matches first row A R R. Row8 col1=R, col2=R, col3=B => matches second row R R B. Row9 col1=R, col2=B, col3=A => matches third row R B A. Yes! So the 3x3 region at rows7-9, cols1-3 is output. Thus rule: find rectangular region (maybe minimal bounding rectangle) that contains only colors A,R,B (azure, red, blue) and maybe is the "hottest" meaning most reds count. Among all such rectangular "campfires" (compact rectangular bed of azure coals speckled with red embers and blue cinders). Need to extract the one with highest number of red cells. If tie maybe something else. Let's verify there are other A,R,B rectangles elsewhere. For example rows0-3 columns0-3 have many B and A but also maybe other colors? Row0 col0-3: B B B A (contains B and A, no R). Row1 col0-3: B A B B (no R). Row2 col0-3: A R A B (has R). Row3 col0-3: B B B A (no R). That's a 4x4 region but includes rows with no R maybe still qualifies? But maybe campfire must be contiguous region of only A,R,B (no other colors). The region we found rows7-9 cols1-3 includes only A,R,B (no other colors). Check other possible rectangles: rows2-4 cols0-3? Row2: A R A B (A,R,B). Row3: B B B A (B,A). Row4: A B A A (A,B). Contains only A,R,B. That's 3x4 region (rows2-4, cols0-3). Count reds: row2 has 1 R, row3 none, row4 none => 1 red. The selected region has reds count: rows7-9: row7 has 2 R, row8 has 2 R, row9 has 1 R => total 5 reds. So indeed highest. Thus algorithm: Find all maximal rectangular subgrids that consist solely of the three colors A,R,B (no other colors). Among them, select the one with the greatest number of R cells. Output that subgrid exactly. But need to consider "compact rectangular bed" maybe means any rectangle (not necessarily maximal) that contains only those colors. Could be many overlapping. The one with most reds likely is the rectangle that encloses the region with most reds, maybe the minimal bounding rectangle of the connected component of A,R,B? In example, the region rows7-9 cols1-3 is a connected compone ... [7542 chars truncated]
"Among the petri dishes, the colony with the most aggressive infection is isolated for study"
120b: k=3
See: Several tissue samples sit in separate culture wells, each a pale azure matrix hosting scattered red pathogens and blue nutrients
Do: The pathologist selects the specimen showing the most virulent red spread and transfers it to the slide
Grid: Azure cell walls form each sample's body; red marks are infection sites, blue marks are benign inclusions; black is the empty tray between wells
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 10x10 with many colors, output is a smaller subgrid (3x3, 4x4, 6x6). It seems we select a region (sample) that has most red spread? The metaphor: several tissue samples sit in separate culture wells, each a pale azure matrix hosting scattered red pathogens and blue nutrients. Azure cell walls form each sample's body; red marks are infection sites, blue marks are benign inclusions; black is empty tray between wells. So azure (A) forms each sample's body (like a region). Red (R) infection sites inside. Blue (B) nutrients. Black (.) empty tray between wells. Goal: select specimen showing most virulent red spread and transfer it to slide. So output is the selected sample region (maybe trimmed to its bounding box) containing the most red cells? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input: 10x10. Output is 3x3 grid: A R R R R B R B A Let's locate in input where this appears. Search for that pattern. Input rows (I'll index). Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to find a region of azure (A) forming a sample. Perhaps each sample is a contiguous region of A cells (including maybe B and R inside). The black '.' separate wells. Let's identify clusters of A (azure) that are contiguous orthogonally? Look at region around rows7-9 columns0-3 maybe? Row7 col1 A, col2 R, col3 R, row8 col1 R, col2 R, col3 B, row9 col1 R, col2 B, col3 A. That's exactly the output 3x3 (starting at row7 col1). Indeed those cells are within a region of A? The surrounding cells maybe '.' at row6 col0-? Row6 col0 '.' etc. So that region is a sample with azure border? Let's see azure cells around: At row7 col0 '.'; row7 col4 '.'; row8 col0 '.'; row8 col4 '.'; row9 col0 '.'; row9 col4 '.' . So the sample is isolated by black '.' border. Within that sample, azure cells are at corners maybe? In output we have A at (0,0), (2,2) etc. So sample includes azure cells at some positions, red and blue inside. Thus rule: find the isolated region (connected component) of azure cells (A) that is surrounded by black '.' (or edge) and contains red and blue. Among all such samples, select the one with most red cells (virulent spread). Then output the subgrid of that sample (its bounding box) exactly as appears. Check Example2. Input: many A region maybe multiple? Let's locate output 4x4? Actually output is 5x4? Wait output lines: A A A A A R R A A A A A A R B A A A A A That's 5 rows, 4 columns? Actually each line has 4 entries. So 5x4. Let's find in input where such pattern appears. Input rows 0-9. Let's view region near rows6-9 columns3-6 maybe? Input rows6: ". . . A A A A A A ." Row7: ". . . A A A R A A ." Row8: ". . . A R A B A A ." Row9: ". . . A B A A A A ." If we take columns3-6 (0-index) maybe? Let's extract subgr ... [8513 chars truncated]
"The astronomer scans each nebula in the field of view and trains the telescope on the one pulsing with the most red giants"
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky holds several distinct nebulae, each a cloud of azure gas peppered with red giant stars and blue dwarf stars
Do: Count the red giants in each nebula and focus the observatory's full aperture on the most evolved cluster
Grid: Azure gas fills each nebula, red points are giant stars, blue points are dwarf stars, black void separates the nebulae
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Output is 3x3. So rule extracts something: "Count the red giants in each nebula and focus the observatory's full aperture on the most evolved cluster". Metaphor: nebulae separated by black void ('.' cells). Azure gas (A) fills each nebula, red points (R) are giants, blue points (B) dwarfs. So each nebula is a region of contiguous non-black cells? Black void separates nebulae. So we need to identify connected components of non-'.' cells (using orthogonal adjacency likely). For each component, count red cells. Then "focus the observatory's full aperture on the most evolved cluster" meaning select the component with the most reds? Then output something derived from that component: maybe the bounding box of that component, with original colors? In example, output is 3x3 grid: A R R / R R B / R B A. Let's examine input example to see component with most reds.
Let's reconstruct example input grid (10x10). I'll label rows.
Row0: B B B A . . . . . .
Row1: B A B B . B A A B A
Row2: A R A B . A B A R A
Row3: B B B A . A A A A B
Row4: A B A A . A B R A R
Row5: . . . . . A A A B A
Row6: . . . . . B B A B A
Row7: . A R R . A B B A R
Row8: . R R B . . . . . .
Row9: . R B A . . . . . .
We need to identify nebulae (connected non-'.' cells). Let's map.
I'll mark coordinates (r,c). '.' are void.
First region left side maybe includes many cells. Let's see connectivity across '.'? The '.' column at col4 separates left and right? Actually column4 (0-index) is '.' in rows0-4, and rows5-9 also '.'? Row5 col0-4 are '.'; row6 col0-4 '.'; row7 col0 '.' then col1 A etc. So there is a vertical line of '.' at col0-? Wait row7 col0 '.' yes. So left side region maybe columns0-3 rows0-4? Let's examine.
Region1: cells with non-'.' in top-left block rows0-4, cols0-3 (since col4 is '.'). Let's list reds in that region: Row2 col1 is R, Row7? not in region. Row8 col1 R, col2 R, row9 col1 R? Actually row9 col1 is R? Row9: ". R B A . . . . . ." yes col1 R. But rows8-9 are below row5 where column0-4 are '.' so they are separated by void? Row5 col0-4 are '.' so region1 ends at row4. So region1 includes rows0-4, cols0-3. Count reds: Row2 col1 R (1). Row4? any R in that block? Row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? row4 col? Row4 col? row4 col? Actually row4 col0 A, col1 B, col2 A, col3 A none red. Row0 none. Row1 none. So total reds =1.
Region2: maybe right side block columns5-9 rows0-4? Let's see: there are non-'.' cells there. Row0 col5-9 are '.' all? Row0 col5 '.' etc. Row1 col5 B, col6 A, col7 A, col8 B, col9 A. Row2 col5 A, col6 B, col7 A, col8 R, col9 A. Row3 col5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 B. Row4 col5 A,6 B,7 R,8 A,9 R. So region2 includes rows1-4, cols5-9 (maybe also row0 none). Count reds: Row2 col8 R (1), Row4 col7 R (2), Row4 col9 R (3). Also any other reds? Row7 etc not in this region. So reds=3.
Region3: lower left area rows5-9 columns5-9? Actually there is region bottom right maybe.
... [7302 chars truncated]
"The harbor pilot eyes each vessel at anchor and boards the one flying the most red distress flags"
120b: fail
See: A dark harbor holds several ships at anchor, each hull painted azure with red distress pennants and blue courtesy flags along their rigging
Do: Count the distress signals on each vessel and row out to the one most urgently calling for help
Grid: Azure hulls form each vessel, red pennants signal distress, blue flags are routine signals, black water separates the ships
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids 10x10 with various colors. Output seems to be a subgrid extracted: maybe the "vessel" with most red pennants? Let's analyze. Example1 Input: Let's map coordinates. Output is 3x3 grid: A R R R R B R B A We need to locate where this appears in input? Look for that pattern. In input, there are azure hulls (A) forming vessels separated by black water (.). Red R are distress, blue B routine. Likely each vessel is a contiguous region of A (azure) maybe with interior? Let's examine example1 input quickly (I'll sketch). Row0: B B B A . . . . . . (col0-9) Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to find a region of A's maybe forming a ship hull. The output 3x3 includes A,R,R etc. Let's search for that pattern in input. Look at rows7-9 columns? Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . If we take subgrid rows7-9 cols1-3? rows7 col1=A, col2=R, col3=R => A R R matches first row of output. Row8 col1=R, col2=R, col3=B => R R B matches second row. Row9 col1=R, col2=B, col3=A => R B A matches third row. Yes! So output is that 3x3 subgrid extracted from location where? That region appears to be a "vessel"? Let's see hull azure A maybe outlines? The subgrid includes A at top-left, but also other colors. The region maybe the "most distressing" vessel: count red R within each vessel and choose the one with most reds. Let's identify vessels: azure hulls likely contiguous A cells (maybe shape). In example1, there are multiple A clusters separated by . (black). The region we extracted includes many reds (R). Let's count reds in that 3x3: there are R at positions (0,1),(0,2),(1,0? actually row8 col0 is . not part), within subgrid: row0: two Rs, row1: two Rs? row1 col0=R, col1=R, col2=B (so two Rs), row2: R at col0, B at col1, A at col2 (one R). Total 5 Rs. Maybe that's highest among vessels. Check other possible vessel subgrids? Not needed. Example2: Output is 5x4? Actually output shows 5 rows, 4 columns? Let's see: Output lines: A A A A A R R A A A A A A R B A A A A A That's 5 rows, 4 columns. Input 10x10. Need to locate that subgrid. Look at input rows? Input has top rows with . . . . . . A A A A etc. Let's locate region of A's with some Rs and B. Starting at row1? Let's examine rows1-5 columns? Input rows1-5 (0-index). Row1: . A A A A . A R R A Row2: . A B A A . A A A A Row3: . A A R A . A R B A Row4: . A A A A . A A A A Row5: . . . . . . . . . . So maybe the vessel is the block of columns 1-4 (A's) plus column6? Actually output is 5x4, maybe columns 1-4 of rows1-5 (excluding row5 which is all .). Let's extract rows1-5, cols1-4 (0-index). Row1 cols1-4: A A A A -> matches first output row. Row2 cols1-4: A B A A -> but output second row is A R R A. Not match. So maybe ... [9597 chars truncated]
"The technician tests each circuit board on the bench and pulls the one with the most overheating components"
120b: fail
See: A dark workbench holds several PCBs side by side, each board an azure substrate with red-hot resistors and blue capacitors
Do: Thermal-scan each board, identify which has the most red-hot components, and remove it for rework
Grid: Azure substrate fills each board, red components are overheating, blue components are nominal, black bench space separates the boards
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 10x10 with '.' black spaces separating boards. Output is a smaller grid (maybe the board with most red components). In description: "dark workbench holds several PCBs side by side, each board an azure substrate with red-hot resistors and blue capacitors. Thermal-scan each board, identify which has the most red-hot components, and remove it for rework". So we need to find subgrid (board) that is azure substrate (A) background, with red (R) and blue (B) components. The board with most red components is selected, and output is that board (maybe trimmed to its bounding box). Let's test with Example1. We need to parse input1. Let's reconstruct quickly. Example1 Input (10x10): Row1: B B B A . . . . . . Row2: B A B B . B A A B A Row3: A R A B . A B A R A Row4: B B B A . A A A A B Row5: A B A A . A B R A R Row6: . . . . . A A A B A Row7: . . . . . B B A B A Row8: . A R R . A B B A R Row9: . R R B . . . . . . Row10: . R B A . . . . . . We see '.' columns separate boards. Likely there are three boards side by side? Let's locate columns of '.' vertical separators. In row1, after column4 (A) there is '.' at col5 onward? Row1: columns 5-10 are '.' . So board1 occupies columns1-4? Let's see other rows: Row2 has '.' at col5 then B at col6 etc. So board2 maybe columns6-10? But there are '.' columns also at start rows6-10 where first five columns are '.' then board continues columns6-10. So there are two boards: left board columns1-4 (size 5 rows? Actually rows1-5 have data, rows6-10 have '.' in those columns). Right board columns6-10 (rows1-5 have data, rows6-10 have data). So board1 is 5x4? Actually rows1-5, cols1-4. Let's extract board1: Rows1-5, cols1-4: Row1: B B B A Row2: B A B B Row3: A R A B Row4: B B B A Row5: A B A A Board2: rows1-5, cols6-10: Row1: . . . . . (actually row1 col6-10 are '.'? row1 had '.' from col5 onward, so board2 maybe rows6-10? Wait row2 col6 is B, col7 A, col8 A, col9 B, col10 A. So board2 occupies rows2-5? Let's examine rows2-5 columns6-10: Row2: col6 B,7 A,8 A,9 B,10 A -> B A A B A Row3: col6 A,7 B,8 A,9 R,10 A -> A B A R A Row4: col6 A,7 A,8 A,9 A,10 B -> A A A A B Row5: col6 A,7 B,8 R,9 A,10 R -> A B R A R Rows6-10 also have data in cols6-10: Row6: col6 A,7 A,8 A,9 B,10 A -> A A A B A Row7: col6 B,7 B,8 A,9 B,10 A -> B B A B A Row8: col6 A,7 B,8 B,9 A,10 R -> A B B A R Row9: col6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 . (all .) Row10: col6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 . (all .) So board2 maybe 8 rows? Actually rows1-5 have '.' at col5, but board2 starts at col6. Row1 col6 is '.' (since row1 after col5 all '.'), so row1 has no data for board2. So board2 rows2-8 maybe? Let's consider board2 region defined by non-'.' cells: rows2-8, cols6-10 (except row9-10 are all .). So board2 size 7 rows (2-8) x5 columns. Now output for example1 is: A R R R R B R B A That's a 3x3 grid. Which board does that correspond to? Let's see board2 maybe contains many reds. Let's count reds in board1: boar ... [8458 chars truncated]
"The oracle peers into each sacred pool and chooses the vision stained deepest with blood prophecy"
120b: fail
See: Several still pools lie in a dark temple floor, each shimmering azure water marred by red blood-visions and blue spirit-lights
Do: Read the omens in each pool, select the one where red prophecy bleeds most thickly, and deliver that vision alone
Grid: Azure water fills each pool, red stains are blood omens, blue lights are benign spirits, black stone separates the pools
We need to infer rule. The description: "Several still pools lie in a dark temple floor, each shimmering azure water marred by red blood-visions and blue spirit-lights. What to do: Read the omens in each pool, select the one where red prophecy bleeds most thickly, and deliver that vision alone. Grid details: Azure water fills each pool, red stains are blood omens, blue lights are benign spirits, black stone separates the pools." Interpretation: Input grid contains multiple "pools" separated by black cells (.)? Actually '.' is black. In examples, there are regions of non-black cells separated by rows/columns of '.' maybe forming rectangular subgrids. The output is a subgrid (pool) that has the most red cells? "select the one where red prophecy bleeds most thickly" meaning choose the region with highest count of red (R). Output that region exactly as is. Let's test with Example1. Input 10x10. Let's locate black '.' cells. In example1 input, there are '.' in column 5 (0-index?) Actually row1: "B B B A . . . . . ." So after first 4 cells, rest are '.' (black). Row2: "B A B B . B A A B A" So column5 is '.' then rest non-black. Row3: "A R A B . A B A R A". Row4: "B B B A . A A A A B". Row5: "A B A A . A B R A R". Row6: ". . . . . A A A B A". Row7: ". . . . . B B A B A". Row8: ". A R R . A B B A R". Row9: ". R R B . . . . . .". Row10: ". R B A . . . . . ." So black '.' form a vertical line column5 (index4) and also rows6-10 have leading '.' columns 1-5 maybe? Actually rows6-10 have first five '.' then rest non-black. So there are multiple pools: left side of column5? Let's think: The black stones separate pools. Likely each pool is a contiguous region of non-black cells (A,B,R) connected orthogonally (4-neighbor) not crossing '.'. We need to find each connected component of non-black cells. Then choose the component with most red cells (R). Output that component's subgrid (its bounding rectangle?) The output in example1 is: A R R R R B R B A That's a 3x3 grid. Let's see which component matches that. Look at input region near rows8-10 columns2-4 maybe? Let's extract rows8-10 columns2-4 (1-index). Row8: ". A R R . A B B A R" columns2-4 = A R R. Row9: ". R R B . . . . . ." columns2-4 = R R B. Row10: ". R B A . . . . . ." columns2-4 = R B A. That's exactly the output. So component is the cluster of non-black cells in rows8-10 columns2-4 (plus maybe more cells adjacent?). Are there any other non-black cells adjacent to that region? Row8 column5 is '.' so stops. Row9 column5 '.' etc. Row8 column1 '.'; row9 column1 '.'; row10 column1 '.'; So that component is isolated. Count reds: In that 3x3, reds: positions: (row8 col2 A not red), (row8 col3 R), (row8 col4 R), row9 col2 R, col3 R, col4 B, row10 col2 R, col3 B, col4 A. So reds count = 5? Actually R's at (8,3),(8,4),(9,2),(9,3),(10,2) =5. That's maybe the highest among components. Check other components: For example, top-left region rows1-5 columns1-4 maybe? Let's count reds there. Row1 col1-4: B B B ... [8509 chars truncated]
"The choreographer watches each troupe rehearse and selects the company whose dancers blush the most with exertion"
120b: k=1
See: Several dance studios separated by dark hallways, each filled with azure-clad dancers, some flushed red with effort, others cool blue with reserve
Do: Observe which studio holds the most red-flushed performers and invite that entire company to the gala
Grid: Azure leotards fill each studio, red flush marks passionate dancers, blue calm marks reserved ones, black corridors divide the studios
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Output is 3x3. The description: "studios separated by dark hallways" black corridors (.) separate regions. Each studio filled with azure (A) background, red (R) and blue (B). Need to find studio with most red and output that entire company (i.e., the region) maybe as a cropped subgrid? In example, output is 3x3 containing only that region? Let's analyze example. We need to parse input grid of example 1. Let's write coordinates. I'll copy input rows (10 columns each). Use spaces: Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We have black '.' corridors dividing studios. Let's identify connected components of non-'.' cells (i.e., A,R,B). Connectivity likely orthogonal (4-direction). Let's find components. We can map grid coordinates (r,c). Let's mark '.' positions: many. Component 1: top-left area before first '.' column? At columns 0-3 maybe. Let's see rows 0-4 have non-'.' in columns 0-3. Row0 col0-3: B B B A. Row1 col0-3: B A B B. Row2 col0-3: A R A B. Row3 col0-3: B B B A. Row4 col0-3: A B A A. All these are contiguous (no '.' inside). So component1 is a 5x4 block (rows0-4, cols0-3). Contains many B, A, and some R at (2,1). Count reds? Only one R at (2,1). Blues many. Component2: maybe region right of column4? There is '.' column4 separating. After column4, there are cells in columns5-9 but also some '.' rows5-9 etc. Let's examine rows0-4 columns5-9: Row0 col5-9 are . . . . . (all .). Row1 col5-9: B A A B A (col5 B,6 A,7 A,8 B,9 A). Row2 col5-9: A B A R A (col5 A,6 B,7 A,8 R,9 A). Row3 col5-9: A A A A B (col5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 B). Row4 col5-9: A B R A R (col5 A,6 B,7 R,8 A,9 R). So these are contiguous region (since column4 is '.' barrier). Also rows5-9 have some cells in columns5-9 but there are '.' rows5-9 columns0-4 maybe separate. Rows5: col5-9: A A A B A (5 A,6 A,7 A,8 B,9 A) Row6: col5-9: B B A B A (5 B,6 B,7 A,8 B,9 A) Row7: col5-9: A B B A R (5 A,6 B,7 B,8 A,9 R) Row8: col5-9: . . . . . (all .) Row9: col5-9: . . . . . (all .) But note rows5-7 columns5-9 are connected to rows1-4 region via vertical adjacency at rows5-7 column5 etc? Row5 col5 is A, above row4 col5 is A, not '.' so they are connected. So component2 includes rows1-7 columns5-9 (except rows8-9). Also row7 col9 is R. Thus component2 is large region containing many reds: positions: (2,8) R, (4,7) R, (4,9) R, (7,9) R, maybe others? Also (7,2?) Wait (7,2) is R but column2 is left side of '.'? Actually row7 col2 is R, but column2 is left of column4 '.'? Row7 col0 is '.'; col1 A; col2 R; col3 R; col4 '.' So row7 col2,3 are part of a separate region maybe? Let's examine rows7-9 columns0-3 area. Rows5-6 columns0-4 are '.' (row5 col0-4 all .). Row7 col0 '.'; col1 A; col2 R; col3 R; col4 '.' So there is a small re ... [6147 chars truncated]
"The geologist cores each outcrop and keeps only the sample richest in ruby deposits"
120b: fail
See: A dark landscape exposes several rock formations, each a mass of azure mineral matrix embedded with red ruby crystals and blue sapphire inclusions
Do: Assay each outcrop for ruby concentration and extract the formation with the greatest red gem density
Grid: Azure matrix forms each rock body, red crystals are rubies, blue crystals are sapphires, black terrain separates the outcrops
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with colors. Output seems to be a subgrid extracted: maybe the outcrop with greatest red density. The description: azure matrix forms each rock body, red crystals rubies, blue sapphires, black terrain separates outcrops. So we need to find connected components (outcrops) composed of azure (A) with red and blue inside? The black '.' separates. Need to assay each outcrop for ruby concentration (red count) and extract the formation with greatest red gem density (maybe highest proportion of red within that component). Output is the subgrid of that component? Let's test. Example1 Input 10x10. Output is 3x3 grid: A R R R R B R B A Let's locate in input where that pattern appears. Search manually. Input rows (index 0-9). Write them: 0: B B B A . . . . . . 1: B A B B . B A A B A 2: A R A B . A B A R A 3: B B B A . A A A A B 4: A B A A . A B R A R 5: . . . . . A A A B A 6: . . . . . B B A B A 7: . A R R . A B B A R 8: . R R B . . . . . . 9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to find a region of azure (A) matrix with red and blue inside. Look at region around rows7-9 columns? Let's extract subgrid rows7-9 cols0-2 maybe? rows7: . A R ; row8: . R R ; row9: . R B . Not match output. Output pattern: Row0: A R R Row1: R R B Row2: R B A Where does that appear? Let's scan. Rows2-4 cols0-2: Row2: A R A Row3: B B B Row4: A B A -> not. Rows2-4 cols2-4? Row2 col2 A, col3 B, col4 . ; not. Rows7-9 cols1-3 maybe: Rows7 col1 A, col2 R, col3 R => A R R matches first row! Good. Row8 col1 R, col2 R, col3 B => R R B matches second row. Row9 col1 R, col2 B, col3 A => R B A matches third row. Yes! So output is subgrid rows7-9, cols1-3 (0-index). That region includes azure A at (7,1) and (9,3) etc. So the selected outcrop is that component. Now we need to see why that component is chosen: maybe it's the component with highest red density among azure components. Let's identify components of azure (A) that are contiguous (maybe orthogonal) and include red and blue inside? The region rows7-9 cols1-3 includes A at (7,1) and (9,3) and also other A maybe? Let's see connectivity: The component likely includes A cells that are adjacent orthogonally (maybe 4-direction). Let's map all A cells in that area: (7,1) A, (7,5?) not in region. (8,?) none. (9,3) A. Are they connected via red/blue? The component may be defined as the set of cells that are not black (i.e., any color) but separated by black '.'? The description: black terrain separates outcrops. So outcrops are contiguous regions of non-black cells (any color). So we need to find each connected component of non-'.' cells (using orthogonal adjacency). Then compute ruby concentration: maybe number of red cells divided by total cells in component. Choose component with greatest red density. Then output the minimal bounding rectangle of that component? In example, component rows7-9 cols1-3 includes also maybe other cells beyond that rectangle? Let's see ... [7352 chars truncated]
"The chef tastes each simmering pot and serves only the spiciest one"
120b: k=3
See: A stovetop holds several pots side by side, each filled with a pale broth dotted with red chili flakes and blue herbs
Do: Taste each pot, judge which has absorbed the most heat from its red chili, and plate that dish alone
Grid: Azure is the broth base, red flecks are chili, blue flecks are mild herbs, black is the cold iron stovetop between burners
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids 10x10, output smaller subgrid containing something. The metaphor: stovetop with pots side by side, each filled with azure broth base, red chili flakes, blue herbs, black stovetop between burners. Need to "taste each pot, judge which has absorbed the most heat from its red chili, and plate that dish alone". So we likely need to find region (pot) with most red cells? Output is that region's content? Let's examine Example1. We need to locate "pots": maybe contiguous region of azure (A) with red (R) and blue (B) inside, separated by black (.) columns? In input1, there are many '.' columns maybe separating sections. Let's view input1 grid (10x10). I'll rewrite rows with spaces: Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We see a vertical line of '.' at column4 (0-index). So left side columns0-3 maybe pot1, right side columns5-9 maybe pot2? Actually there are also '.' columns 5-9 after column4? Wait row0 columns5-9 are '.'; row1 column5 is B not '.'; So not uniform. But output is 3x3 grid: A R R R R B R B A That seems like a subgrid extracted from somewhere. Let's locate that pattern in input. Search for that 3x3 pattern. Look at rows7-9 columns? Row7: . A R R . A B B A R. At columns1-4: A R R . (not). columns2-5: R R . A (no). Row8: . R R B . . . . . . ; columns1-3: R R B matches top row? Output top row A R R, not R R B. Row8 columns0-2: . R R. Not. Maybe pattern appears elsewhere. Let's scan left side region columns0-3 rows0-3: rows0-3 col0-3 matrix: Row0: B B B A Row1: B A B B Row2: A R A B Row3: B B B A Not match. What about region rows1-3 col5-7? Row1 col5-7: B A A ; Row2: A B A ; Row3: A A A . Not. Maybe output is the pot with most red count. Need to identify each pot region (connected component of non-black maybe). Black '.' are stovetop separators. So each pot is a contiguous region of non-'.' cells (A,B,R). Let's find components. In example1, there are two main regions left of column4 and right of column4? Let's see connectivity across column4: column4 is all '.'? rows0-9 column4 values: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 '.' row4 '.' row5 '.' row6 '.' row7 '.' row8 '.' row9 '.' Yes column4 all '.' So separates left and right halves. Left half columns0-3: contains many B, A, R. Right half columns5-9: also contains cells. We need to find which half has more red? Count reds left vs right. Count reds left (cols0-3). Let's list rows: Row0 col0-3: B B B A (0 reds) Row1: B A B B (0) Row2: A R A B (1) Row3: B B B A (0) Row4: A B A A (0) Row5: . . . . (none) Row6: . . . . (none) Row7: . A R R (col0 '.' col1 A col2 R col3 R) => 2 reds Row8: . R R B => 2 reds (col0 '.' col1 R col2 R col3 B) Row9: . R B A => 1 red Total left reds = 1+2+2+1 =6. Right half columns5-9: need c ... [8933 chars truncated]
"The conductor auditions each ensemble and advances the one whose brass section roars loudest"
120b: fail
See: Separate rehearsal rooms each hold a chamber group — mostly azure-robed strings with a few red-costumed brass players and blue-costumed woodwinds
Do: Count the brass voices in each room and send the ensemble with the richest brass presence to the concert stage
Grid: Azure players fill each ensemble; red players are brass, blue are woodwinds; black silence divides the rehearsal spaces
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have grid with colors. Description: "Separate rehearsal rooms each hold a chamber group — mostly azure-robed strings with a few red-costumed brass players and blue-costumed woodwinds". So azure = A (strings), red = R (brass), blue = B (woodwinds). Black '.' are silence dividing rehearsal spaces. Goal: "Count the brass voices in each room and send the ensemble with the richest brass presence to the concert stage". So we need to find region (room) separated by black cells (maybe contiguous area of non-black). Count number of red cells in each region. Choose region with highest count of red. Then output that region's grid? The output examples show smaller grids. Example1: Input 10x10. Output is 3x3 grid: A R R R R B R B A Let's locate region with most reds. Need to parse input. I'll map coordinates. Let's write rows. Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . Black '.' separate rooms. Let's identify contiguous non-black regions (8-connectivity? likely orthogonal). Usually ARC tasks use orthogonal adjacency (up/down/left/right). Let's consider. Region1: top-left area before first column of '.' at column4? Actually column4 is '.' in rows0-4. So left side columns0-3 rows0-4 form a region. Let's count reds there. List cells (rows0-4, cols0-3) non-black. Row0: B B B A (no reds) Row1: B A B B (no reds) Row2: A R A B (one R at col1) Row3: B B B A (no reds) Row4: A B A A (no reds) Total reds =1. Region2: middle area columns5-9 rows0-4? Actually there are '.' at column4 separating. At rows0-4 columns5-9 have mixture. Rows0 col5-9: . . . . . (all .) Actually row0 col5 is '.'? Row0 after column4 '.' there are '.' all the way. So region maybe not there. Rows1 col5-9: B A A B A (no reds) Row2 col5-9: A B A R A (one R at col8) Row3 col5-9: A A A A B (no reds) Row4 col5-9: A B R A R (two Rs at col7 and col9) Total reds = 1+2=3. Region3: bottom area rows5-9 columns0-4? Let's see rows5-9 have '.' in first five columns? Row5 col0-4 are '.' all. So region maybe right side columns5-9 rows5-9. Rows5 col5-9: A A A B A (no reds) Row6 col5-9: B B A B A (no reds) Row7 col5-9: A B B A R (one R at col9) Row8 col5-9: . . . . . (all .) Row9 col5-9: . . . . . (all .) Total reds =1. Region4: there is also region rows7-9 columns0-4 maybe? Let's see rows7 col0-4: . A R R . (two Rs at col2,3). Row8 col0-4: . R R B . (two Rs at col1,2). Row9 col0-4: . R B A . (one R at col1). So region of left bottom area separated by '.' column0? Actually column0 row7 is '.' but column0 row8 '.' row9 '.'; column0 row5 '.' etc. So region includes rows7-9 columns1-4 maybe. Count reds: row7 col2,3 =2; row8 col1,2 =2; row9 col1 =1 => total 5 reds. That's highest. Now output grid is 3x3: A R R / R R B / R B A ... [9782 chars truncated]
"The scout watches every scrimmage and drafts the squad that drew the most blood"
120b: k=3
See: Several practice fields are laid out on a training ground, each team wearing azure jerseys with a few players marked in red penalty cards and blue captain bands
Do: Survey each field, tally the red cards, and recruit the team that played hardest
Grid: Azure jerseys fill each squad; red marks are fouls committed, blue marks are leadership badges; black grass separates the fields
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are 10x10 with '.' black separating fields? Output is a smaller subgrid extracted. In Example1 output is 3x3. Example2 output 5x5. Example3 output 6x6. So output corresponds to a region (field) defined by azure (A) background with red (R) and blue (B) marks, separated by black '.' rows/columns. The description: "Several practice fields are laid out on a training ground, each team wearing azure jerseys with a few players marked in red penalty cards and blue captain bands. Black grass separates the fields." So the grid contains multiple subgrids (fields) separated by rows/columns of '.' (black). Within each field, azure (A) is background, red (R) and blue (B) are marks. The task: "Survey each field, tally the red cards, and recruit the team that played hardest". So we need to count red marks in each field, and select the field with the most reds (hardest played). Then output that field (the subgrid) as is? Let's verify with examples. Example1 input: Let's map. Need to locate fields separated by '.' rows/columns. Input 10x10. Let's write rows with indices. Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We see a vertical line of '.' at column4? Actually column4 (0-index) is '.' in rows0-4, then rows5-9 also '.'? Row5 col0-4 are '.'? Row5: ". . . . . A A A B A" so columns0-4 are '.'; row6 same; row7 col0 '.' then col4 '.'; row8 col0 '.' col4 '.'; row9 col0 '.' col4 '.'. So there is a block of '.' forming a separator: columns0-4 rows5-9 are '.' (a 5x5 black area). Also column4 rows0-4 are '.' vertical line. So fields likely are top-left 5x5 region (rows0-4, cols0-3?) Actually columns0-3 rows0-4 contain colors B/A/R etc. That's a 5x4? Wait columns0-3 inclusive is 4 columns. But output is 3x3. Maybe field is 3x3 region of azure with reds and blues? Let's identify distinct fields: maybe there are three fields: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right? Let's examine. Top-left region rows0-4 cols0-3 (5x4). Contains B, A, R etc. Not square. Top-right region rows0-4 cols5-9 (5x5). Contains .? Actually columns5-9 rows0-4 have '.' in row0 col5-9 are '.'; row1 col5 is B, col6 A, col7 A, col8 B, col9 A; row2 col5 A,6 B,7 A,8 R,9 A; row3 col5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 B; row4 col5 A,6 B,7 R,8 A,9 R. So there is a mix. Bottom region rows5-9 columns5-9 (5x5) contains A, B, R etc. But output is 3x3: "A R R / R R B / R B A". Let's see where that appears in input. Search for that pattern. Look at rows7-9 columns? Row7: ". A R R . A B B A R". Starting at col1? Row7 col1 A, col2 R, col3 R, col4 ., col5 A, col6 B, col7 B, col8 A, col9 R. Row8: ". R R B . . . . . .". Row9: ". R B A . . . . . .". If we take subgrid rows7-9 cols1-3 (3x3): rows7 col1-3 = A R R ; row8 col1-3 = R R B ; row9 col1-3 = R B A . That's exa ... [8726 chars truncated]
"The storm chaser surveys the radar mosaic and drives toward the cell crackling with the most lightning"
120b: k=1
See: A weather radar shows several isolated storm cells against a dark sky, each a mass of azure cloud with scattered red lightning cores and blue rain shafts
Do: Read each cell's electrical intensity by its red signatures, then zoom the camera on the most electrified system
Grid: Azure is cloud mass, red is lightning activity, blue is precipitation, black is clear sky between cells
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Output is 3x3. So rule extracts a subgrid around something. Description: "weather radar shows several isolated storm cells ... each a mass of azure cloud with scattered red lightning cores and blue rain shafts". Azure = A, red = R, blue = B. Need to read each cell's electrical intensity by its red signatures, then zoom the camera on the most electrified system. So find region (cell) with most red? Probably each "storm cell" is a cluster of A with some R and B. Need to identify clusters of non-black? Black is '.'. In example input, we need to locate clusters. Let's map quickly? Hard but maybe output is 3x3 showing the most electrified cell (most reds). Output grid is: A R R R R B R B A That's a 3x3 pattern with many reds. So likely the cluster with highest count of R, and then output the minimal bounding box of that cluster? Let's see cluster shape maybe 3x3. In input, find a region where pattern matches? Let's search mentally: Look at rows near bottom? Input rows (index 0-9). I'll write them: 0: B B B A . . . . . . 1: B A B B . B A A B A 2: A R A B . A B A R A 3: B B B A . A A A A B 4: A B A A . A B R A R 5: . . . . . A A A B A 6: . . . . . B B A B A 7: . A R R . A B B A R 8: . R R B . . . . . . 9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to find clusters of non-'.' maybe separated by '.' columns/rows. There are multiple clusters. The output 3x3 seems to correspond to cluster at rows 7-9, columns 1-3? Let's extract that region: Rows 7-9, cols 0-3 maybe: Row7: . A R R Row8: . R R B Row9: . R B A If we take columns 1-3 (excluding leading .) we get: Row7 cols1-3: A R R Row8 cols1-3: R R B Row9 cols1-3: R B A That matches output exactly! So rule: find the cluster with most reds, then output its minimal bounding rectangle (maybe trimmed of surrounding black). In this case cluster includes those cells plus maybe surrounding '.'? The cluster includes also maybe other cells? Let's see cluster includes also at row7 col0 '.' not part. So bounding box of that cluster is rows7-9, cols1-3 (since col0 is '.' and col4 maybe '.'?). Indeed those cells are all non-'.' (A,R,B). So cluster is contiguous orthogonally? Check connectivity: cells at (7,1) A adjacent to (7,2) R etc. So cluster of non-'.' cells. There may be other clusters with similar size but less reds. Need to count reds per cluster. Let's count reds in this cluster: positions: (7,2)R, (7,3)R, (8,1)R, (8,2)R, (9,1)R => 5 reds. Also maybe (8,?) there is R at (8,2) already counted. So 5 reds. Other clusters: top left cluster maybe rows0-3 cols0-3 etc. Count reds there? Let's see: rows0-3 cols0-3 contain many B and A but any R? Row2 col1 is R, row2 col? also maybe none else. So reds count maybe 1. So the most reds cluster is the bottom-left one. Thus rule: Identify connected components of non-'.' cells (using orthogonal adjacency). Compute number of R cells in each component. Choose component with highest count of R (if tie maybe something else). Then ... [3739 chars truncated]
"The demolition crew inspects every condemned building and topples the one most riddled with fire damage"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A city block shows several structures separated by empty lots, each building made of azure stone with red scorch marks and blue water stains
Do: Survey each structure's fire damage, then extract the one bearing the deepest burns for the wrecking ball
Grid: Azure stone forms each building's walls; red is fire scarring, blue is water damage; black lots separate the structures
"The general studies the battlefield map and commits reserves to the sector bleeding the most"
120b: fail
See: A war map is divided into separate engagement zones by dead ground, each zone filled with azure troop markers, red casualty flags, and blue supply depots
Do: Assess each zone's red casualty count and extract the sector suffering heaviest losses for the dispatch
Grid: Azure markers are standing units, red flags mark casualties, blue marks are supply points, black terrain is no-man's-land between sectors
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 10x10? Output is 3x3. The description: zones separated by dead ground (black '.'), each zone filled with azure (A), red (R), blue (B). Need to assess each zone's red count and extract sector suffering heaviest losses for the dispatch. So likely we need to find connected components (zones) of non-black cells (i.e., cells not '.'), separated by '.' which are black terrain. Within each zone, count number of red cells. Choose the zone with highest red count. Then output that zone's subgrid? The output in example is 3x3 grid containing only that zone's pattern? Let's test. We need to parse example input. Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows. Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We need to identify zones separated by '.' (black). Let's mark '.' positions. They form vertical line at column4? Actually column indices 0-9. Column4 (0-index) appears '.' in rows0-4, and rows5-9 also '.'? Row5 col0-4 are '.' (first five). Row6 col0-4 '.' . Row7 col0 '.'? Row7 col0 '.' yes, col1 A, col2 R, col3 R, col4 '.' . Row8 col0 '.' col1 R col2 R col3 B col4 '.' . Row9 col0 '.' col1 R col2 B col3 A col4 '.' . So there is a big black region left side rows5-9 columns0-4, plus column4 vertical line top rows0-4. So zones: left top region (columns0-3 rows0-4) maybe one zone; right top region (columns5-9 rows0-4) another; bottom region (rows5-9 columns5-9) maybe third; also bottom left region (rows7-9 columns1-3?) but those are separated by '.'? Actually rows7-9 columns1-3 are not '.' and left of column4 but above row5 there is '.' region, but rows7-9 column1-3 are adjacent to the black region rows5-9 col0-4 which are '.'; but they are not connected to top left zone because there is a gap of '.' rows5-6 col0-3? Row5 col0-4 are '.' so separation. So bottom left small region (rows7-9 col1-3) is isolated zone. Thus zones: Zone1: top-left (rows0-4, cols0-3). Contains many B, A, R etc. Zone2: top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9). Contains A, B, R etc. Zone3: bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9). Contains A, B, R etc. Zone4: bottom-left small (rows7-9, cols1-3). Contains A,R,R etc. Now we need to count red cells in each zone. Let's list. Zone1 cells (rows0-4, cols0-3): Row0: B B B A -> reds? none. Row1: B A B B -> none. Row2: A R A B -> one R at col1. Row3: B B B A -> none. Row4: A B A A -> none. Total reds =1. Zone2 (rows0-4, cols5-9): Rows: Row0 cols5-9: . . . . .? Actually row0 col5 is '.'? Row0 col4 '.' col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 '.' col9 '.' all '.' So zone2 maybe empty? Wait row0 col5 is '.' because after column4 there are '.' all the way. So top-right zone maybe starts at row1 col5 etc. Row1 col5 B, col6 A, col7 A, col8 B, col9 A -> reds none. Row2 col5 A, col6 B, col7 A, col8 R, col9 A -&g ... [9033 chars truncated]
"The critic watches each act through opera glasses and gives the standing ovation to whichever scene burned brightest"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stage divided into spotlit tableaux by dark curtains — each scene features azure-costumed chorus members with a few performers in scarlet and sapphire
Do: Judge which tableau radiates the most scarlet passion and pull that scene forward for the encore
Grid: Azure costumes fill each tableau, scarlet is dramatic fire, sapphire is cool composure, black curtains divide the scenes
"The gardener walks between raised beds and harvests only from the one bursting with the most ripe tomatoes"
120b: k=3
See: Several raised garden beds separated by dark mulch paths, each bed a carpet of azure foliage dotted with red ripe fruit and blue flowers
Do: Count the red ripeness in each bed and carry away the entire harvest from the most productive plot
Grid: Azure leaves fill each bed, red fruit signals ripeness, blue flowers are still blooming, black mulch paths divide the beds
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids 10x10 with various colors. Output is a smaller subgrid extracted? Example1 output is 3x3. Example2 output 5x5. Example3 output 6x6. Looks like they extract region (bed) containing most red (R) count? Metaphor: raised garden beds separated by dark mulch paths (black '.' maybe). Each bed is area of azure (A) with red fruit (R) and blue flowers (B). Count red in each bed and carry away entire harvest from most productive plot. So we need to find connected region (bed) of azure (A) maybe with other colors inside, bounded by black '.' paths. Then count number of R within each region, pick region with highest R count, and output that region (the whole region) as a grid (cropped to its bounding box). In examples, output grids contain only colors from that region (including A, R, B). Let's verify. Example1 input: Let's map. I'll quickly sketch. 10x10. There are '.' columns maybe separating? Input rows: Row0: B B B A . . . . . . Row1: B A B B . B A A B A Row2: A R A B . A B A R A Row3: B B B A . A A A A B Row4: A B A A . A B R A R Row5: . . . . . A A A B A Row6: . . . . . B B A B A Row7: . A R R . A B B A R Row8: . R R B . . . . . . Row9: . R B A . . . . . . We see '.' columns at positions 4-9? Actually column4 is '.' for rows0-4, then rows5-9 column0-4 are '.' etc. So there are two beds? One left side (columns0-3) with A,R,B etc, and right side (columns5-9) maybe another bed. The '.' path vertical at column4 separates. Also bottom rows have '.' left side? Actually rows5-9 columns0-4 are '.' making lower left area empty, maybe separate bed. We need to find each contiguous region of non-'.' cells (i.e., not black). Let's identify region1: top-left area columns0-3 rows0-4 (since rows5-9 have '.' there). That's a 5x4 block. Contains many A,R,B. Count R's there. Let's count: Row0 col0-3: B B B A -> 0 R. Row1: B A B B ->0. Row2: A R A B -> 1 R. Row3: B B B A ->0. Row4: A B A A ->0. So total 1 R. Region2: top-right area columns5-9 rows0-4? Actually rows0-4 columns5-9 have some cells: Row0 col5-9 are . . . . . (all .) So none. Row1 col5-9: B A A B A (col5 B,6 A,7 A,8 B,9 A) -> includes 0 R. Row2 col5-9: A B A R A (col5 A,6 B,7 A,8 R,9 A) -> 1 R. Row3 col5-9: A A A A B (col5 A,6 A,7 A,8 A,9 B) ->0. Row4 col5-9: A B R A R (col5 A,6 B,7 R,8 A,9 R) -> 2 R. So total R = 1+2=3. Region3: bottom-right area rows5-9 columns5-9? Let's see rows5-9 columns5-9 have many cells: Row5 col5-9: A A A B A (5 A,6 A,7 A,8 B,9 A) ->0 R. Row6: B B A B A (5 B,6 B,7 A,8 B,9 A) ->0. Row7: A B B A R (5 A,6 B,7 B,8 A,9 R) ->1 R. Row8: . . . . . (col5-9 all .) Row9: . . . . . So region maybe includes rows5-7 columns5-9. Count R =1. Region4: bottom-left area rows5-9 columns0-4? But those are all '.' except maybe some? Row7 col1-3 have A R R etc but column0 is '.' row7 col0 '.' row7 col1 A row7 col2 R row7 col3 R col4 '.' So there is a region of non-'.' cells isolated? Let's see rows7-9 columns0-4: Row7 ... [8514 chars truncated]
See: A 3x3 grid of colored cells. Each cell contains one of several possible colors. The grid has three rows and three columns, with no special background color or distinguished elements — every cell is equally significant.
Do: Expand the 3x3 input grid into a 5x5 output grid by duplicating the border rows and columns while keeping the center row and column single. Specifically: (1) Duplicate each column: the first column appears twice, the middle column appears once, and the last column appears twice, producing 5 columns per row. (2) Duplicate each row: the first row appears twice, the middle row appears once, and the last row appears twice, producing 5 rows total. In index terms, output row i maps to input row [0,0,1,2,2][i], and output column j maps to input column [0,0,1,2,2][j].
Grid: Input is always a 3x3 grid. Output is always a 5x5 grid. There is no background color; all cells carry meaningful color values. The transformation preserves all original colors and spatial relationships, only scaling the grid by stretching the border rows and columns.
"A photograph printed with extra-thick borders, like a Polaroid that bleeds at the edges."
120b: k=2
See: A tiny mosaic tile, three paces by three paces — a miniature world where every colored stone carries equal weight, none more important than another.
Do: The edges of the mosaic are sticky — they cling to the frame and leave an echo of themselves as the tile is stretched onto a larger wall. The outermost stones on every side press themselves into the plaster twice, as if they're bracing against the border, while the center stones, confident in their position, sit calmly without doubling. Think of bread dough rolled outward: the crust thickens at the rim while the middle stays thin.
Grid: The miniature mosaic is always three-by-three. The wall it's mounted on is always five-by-five. No stone changes color during the stretching — they simply leave shadows of themselves along the edges, like footprints pressed deeper at the margins of a path.
We need to infer rule: Input 3x3, output 5x5. The description: edges double (appear twice) while center stays single. Essentially each cell of input is expanded to a 2x2 block if it's on outer border? Let's examine example1. Input: Row1: B G X Row2: B R A Row3: A G A Output 5x5: Row1: B B G X X Row2: B B G X X Row3: B B R A A Row4: A A G A A Row5: A A G A A Let's map positions. Output coordinates (0-4). Input coordinates (0-2). The rule maybe: For each input cell, we place it in output at positions (i*? + offset). Since output larger by 2 rows/cols. Possibly each input cell maps to a 2x2 block, but interior cells (center) maybe map to 1x1? Let's test. Input (0,0) B (top-left corner). In output, top-left 2x2 block (rows0-1, cols0-1) are B B; B B. Indeed output rows0-1 cols0-1 are B. Good. Input (0,1) G (top edge, not corner). Should expand to 2x? maybe 2 rows, 1 column? Let's see output rows0-1, col2? Output col2 is G at rows0-1? Row0 col2 = G, row1 col2 = G. Yes column2 (index2) has G for rows0-1. So a 2x1 vertical block. Input (0,2) X (top-right corner). Output rows0-1, cols3-4? Row0 col3 X, col4 X; row1 col3 X, col4 X. Yes 2x2 block. Input (1,0) B (left edge middle). Output rows2-? Actually row index 2? Let's see output row2 col0-1? Row2 col0 B, col1 B. Row3 col0 A? Wait row3 col0 A not B. So B appears only rows2? Actually output row2 col0 B, col1 B. Row3 col0 A. So B occupies a 1x2 horizontal block? Let's examine: Input (1,0) is left edge middle. Output rows2 (index2) col0-1 are B B. Row3 col0-1 are A A (different). So B appears only in row2, not row3. So left edge middle expands horizontally (1 row, 2 columns). Similarly input (1,2) A (right edge middle) appears in output row2 col3-4? Row2 col3 A, col4 A. Yes. Input (2,0) A (bottom-left corner) appears rows3-4 cols0-1 as A A; A A. Yes 2x2. Input (2,1) G (bottom edge middle) appears rows3-4 col2? Row3 col2 G, row4 col2 G. That's 2x1 vertical. Input (2,2) A (bottom-right corner) rows3-4 col3-4 A A; A A. Now interior cell (1,1) R (center). Output row2 col2 = R? Row2 col2 is R. Only single cell. Yes. Also interior cell (1,2) A? Wait (1,2) is A (right middle edge) not interior. interior only (1,1). Also (1,0) left edge middle. Thus rule: Expand 3x3 to 5x5 by duplicating border cells outward: corners become 2x2 blocks, edge (non-corner) cells become 2x1 or 1x2 blocks depending orientation, and center stays 1x1. Specifically mapping: Output size = input size + 2 (since each side adds one extra column/row). For each input cell (i,j): - If i==0 (top row) and j==0 (left col) => corner: occupies rows 0-1, cols 0-1. - If i==0 and j==2 (right corner) => rows0-1, cols3-4. - If i==2 and j==0 => rows3-4, cols0-1. - If i==2 and j==2 => rows3-4, cols3-4. - If i==0 (top edge, not corner) => rows0-1, col j+1? Actually j=1 maps to col2 (single column). So top edge cells become vertical 2x1 block at column j+1 (since corners occupy 0-1 and 3-4). So column index = j+1. - If i==2 (bottom ... [4503 chars truncated]
"A cell whose membrane thickens before division, reinforcing its outer walls while the nucleus stays lean."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A tiny organism — a 3×3 colony of pigmented cells, each carrying its own color. No cell is more important than another; together they form a living tile.
Do: The colony undergoes defensive growth: peripheral cells replicate outward, doubling the organism's skin layer, while interior cells hold steady. The edges bulk up as though bracing against osmotic pressure, and the whole body swells from a compact square into a plumper one.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 colony. Output is a 5×5 organism. Every original color is preserved — only the boundary cells have divided.
"A constellation whose outer stars undergo gravitational lensing, each appearing twice in the sky, while the central star shines undistorted."
120b: k=1
See: A 3×3 star field — nine celestial objects, each a different spectral color. A simple, compact cluster.
Do: Space-time warps near the edges of the cluster: every star along the boundary is gravitationally lensed into a double image. The star at the exact center of mass, shielded from distortion, remains a single point of light. The cluster's apparent size doubles at the fringes.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 cluster. Output is a 5×5 field. Spectral colors are preserved; the boundary stars appear twice.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 5x5. The description: boundary cells duplicated (double image) expanding size, center stays single. So likely each cell in input maps to a 2x2 block if it's on boundary, and 1x1 block if center. But output is 5x5, not 6x6. How to get 5? For 3x3, boundary cells duplicated outward, maybe each boundary cell appears twice in its row/col direction, but overlapping leads to 5. Let's examine example. Input grid (3x3): Row0: B G X Row1: B R A Row2: A G A Output 5x5: Row0: B B G X X Row1: B B G X X Row2: B B R A A Row3: A A G A A Row4: A A G A A Let's map positions. Indices input (r,c): (0,0)=B top-left corner (boundary) (0,1)=G top edge (0,2)=X top-right corner (1,0)=B left edge (1,1)=R center (1,2)=A right edge (2,0)=A bottom-left corner (2,1)=G bottom edge (2,2)=A bottom-right corner Output 5x5 indices (0-4). Let's see mapping. Output rows 0-1 correspond to top boundary duplication? Row0 and Row1 both start with B B G X X. So top row duplicated vertically (two rows). Similarly leftmost columns duplicated horizontally? Let's examine. Take top-left corner B appears at output positions (0,0),(0,1),(1,0),(1,1) = a 2x2 block of B. Indeed output rows0-1 cols0-1 are B B; B B. So corner becomes 2x2 block. Top edge G (input (0,1)) appears at output positions (0,2) and (1,2) (vertical duplication) but also maybe horizontally? Actually output col2 is G for rows0-1. So G appears as 2x1 vertical block (since it's edge not corner). Similarly X (0,2) corner appears as 2x2 block at cols3-4 rows0-1: X X; X X. Indeed output rows0-1 cols3-4 are X X each row. Now middle row (input row1). Left edge B (1,0) appears at output rows2-? Let's see output row2 col0-1 are B B (horizontal duplication) and row3-4 col0-1 are A A (that's from bottom-left corner). Wait need mapping. Input (1,0) B left edge should become vertical duplication? Actually left edge is not corner, so should duplicate horizontally? The description: "every star along the boundary is gravitationally lensed into a double image." Could be duplication both horizontally and vertically? But example shows left edge B appears as a 2x2 block? Let's check output rows2-? Row2 col0-1 are B B (two columns). Row3 col0-1 are A A (different). So B only appears in row2, not row3. So B appears as a 1x2 horizontal block (two columns) at row2. So left edge duplicates horizontally (to the right) but not vertically. Similarly right edge A (1,2) appears at output row2 col3-4 as A A (horizontal duplication). Indeed row2 col3-4 are A A. Center R (1,1) appears at output row2 col2 only? Actually row2 col2 is R. Yes single. Now bottom edge G (2,1) appears at output rows3-4 col2? Let's see rows3-4 col2 are G G (vertical duplication). Indeed row3 col2 = G, row4 col2 = G. So bottom edge duplicates vertically. Bottom corners A (2,0) and A (2,2) become 2x2 blocks at rows3-4 cols0-1 and cols3-4 respectively. Indeed rows3-4 cols0-1 are A A; rows3-4 cols3-4 are A A. Thus rule: ... [2715 chars truncated]
"A ship's flag where the border stripes bleed wide from salt spray, while the central emblem stays crisp."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 signal flag — nine colored patches stitched together. Each patch carries a distinct hue, forming a compact nautical ensign.
Do: Weather the flag: the outermost stripes and bands — exposed to wind and wave — fray and spread, each doubling in width. The protected center patch, sheltered by its neighbors, retains its original slim profile. The flag billows into a larger, border-heavy banner.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 ensign. Output is a 5×5 banner. Patch colors hold; the outer bands have widened.
"A circuit board where the peripheral traces are laid down in redundant double-width for noise immunity, while the core signal path stays single-trace."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 circuit layout — nine components, each color-coded by function. A minimal, compact design.
Do: Harden for production: every trace running along the board's edge is doubled for redundancy and interference shielding. The single trace at the center of the board, already shielded by its neighbors, stays at standard width. The board footprint expands but the circuit topology is unchanged.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 board. Output is a 5×5 board. Component colors are unchanged; edge traces are doubled.
"A magic mirror that fattens the frame of any vision it shows — the edges of the scene echo and repeat, but the heart of the image stays true."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 vision in the scrying glass — nine colored tiles of prophecy, each carrying a distinct hue. The vision is compact and unadorned.
Do: The mirror's enchantment activates: the outermost tiles of the vision bleed outward, each reflected once more at the boundary like a hall of mirrors — but only at the edges. The single tile at the center, the truest part of the prophecy, remains unduplicated. The vision swells in its frame.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 vision. Output is a 5×5 vision. Tile colors remain; the edges are magically doubled.
"A formation where the dancers on the perimeter take one step outward and leave a shadow of themselves behind, while the dancer at the center holds perfectly still."
120b: k=2
See: A 3×3 dance formation — nine dancers, each in a uniquely colored outfit. A tight, square arrangement on the ballroom floor.
Do: The music swells and the formation expands: every dancer along the outside edge steps outward, but their afterimage lingers in the original spot — doubling their visual presence. The center dancer, the anchor of the formation, neither moves nor echoes. The troupe's footprint grows while the choreography's structure holds.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 formation. Output is a 5×5 formation. Costume colors stay; the border dancers are doubled.
We need to infer rule. Input 3x3, output 5x5. The description: border cells are duplicated outward, center stays same, no echo. So likely each border cell appears twice: original position and also in adjacent outward direction, expanding grid.
Let's examine example1.
Input grid (3x3):
Row0: B G X
Row1: B R A
Row2: A G A
Output 5x5:
Row0: B B G X X
Row1: B B G X X
Row2: B B R A A
Row3: A A G A A
Row4: A A G A A
Let's map coordinates. Input indices (r,c) 0-2.
Output indices 0-4.
Observation: The central cell (1,1) = R stays at output (2,2)? Let's see output row2 col2 = R. Yes.
The central cell's value appears only once (no duplication). The border cells appear duplicated in a 2x2 block? Let's see top-left corner input B (0,0). In output, appears at positions (0,0) and (0,1) and (1,0) and (1,1)? Actually output rows0-1 cols0-1 are B B / B B. Yes a 2x2 block of B.
Similarly top middle input G (0,1) appears at output rows0-1 col2? Wait output row0 col2 = G, row1 col2 = G. Also maybe col? Actually output row0 col2 = G, row1 col2 = G. That's a vertical 2x1? But also maybe also at col? Let's examine output row0 col2 = G, row1 col2 = G. Row0 col3 = X, row1 col3 = X. So G appears as a 2x1 vertical block (height 2). Input top middle is border (edge but not corner). So duplication maybe extends outward in direction away from center, i.e., outward direction from center: for top edge cells, duplicate upward? But grid expands outward, so they occupy two rows (original row and one extra row outward). For top edge, outward is upward (negative row). Since output bigger, they occupy rows 0 and 1 (top two rows). Original row (0) becomes rows 0-1? Let's think.
Mapping: Input row0 (top edge) maps to output rows0-1. Input row1 (middle row) maps to output rows2? Actually central row (row1) maps to output row2 (since central row becomes middle of 5). Input row2 (bottom edge) maps to output rows3-4.
Similarly columns: Input col0 (left edge) maps to output cols0-1. Input col1 (middle) maps to output col2. Input col2 (right edge) maps to output cols3-4.
Thus rule: Expand each dimension by factor 2 for border rows/cols, but central row/col stay single.
Specifically, output size = (2*border_rows + 1) = 5. For each cell (r,c):
- If r is 0 (top edge) -> output rows 0 and 1 get that value.
- If r is 2 (bottom edge) -> output rows 3 and 4.
- If r is 1 (center) -> output row 2 only.
Similarly for columns.
Thus each input cell maps to a block of size (row_factor x col_factor) where row_factor = 2 if r is edge else 1; col_factor = 2 if c is edge else 1.
Thus output cell at (R,C) corresponds to input cell at (r,c) where r = 0 if R in {0,1}, r=1 if R=2, r=2 if R in {3,4}. Similarly for columns.
Check other cells: Input (0,2) = X appears at output rows0-1 cols3-4? Output rows0-1 cols3-4 are X X / X X. Yes.
Input (1,0) = B appears at output row2? Wait row2 col0-1? Output row2 col0-1 = B B. Indeed row_factor=1 (center row) but col_factor=2 (left edge) => bloc
... [2721 chars truncated]
"A crystal whose outer faces grow thicker laminations under pressure while the core lattice stays a single layer deep."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 mineral cross-section — nine zones, each a different color representing different mineral inclusions. A compact, even specimen.
Do: The crystal undergoes diagenesis: the outermost zones, exposed to groundwater and pressure, accrete additional layers of the same mineral, doubling in thickness. The innermost zone, insulated by its neighbors, remains a single lamination. The crystal's cross-section widens but its composition doesn't change.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 cross-section. Output is a 5×5 cross-section. Mineral colors are preserved; the boundary zones are thicker.
"A dumpling whose crimped edges are pinched extra-thick, while the filling in the center stays a single thin layer."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 arrangement of colored ingredients laid out on a pastry sheet — think of a mosaic tart where each square holds a different flavor.
Do: Seal the edges: the outer ring of ingredients gets folded over on itself, doubling in presence, like dough crimped around the rim of a pie. The center filling stays as-is — one layer only. The result is a puffier, border-heavy version of the original arrangement.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 tart. Output is a 5×5 tart. Colors stay true; only the perimeter has been reinforced.
"A chord whose root and fifth are doubled in the bass and treble registers while the third rings out alone in the middle voice."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 score — three voices, three beats. Each cell is a note colored by its timbre. The arrangement is simple and symmetrical.
Do: Orchestrate for a fuller ensemble: the outermost voices and the opening and closing beats are doubled by additional instruments playing in unison. The inner voice and the middle beat remain solo. The melody doesn't change — it just sounds richer at the extremes.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 score. Output is a 5×5 score. Every note keeps its original color; the edges simply resonate with more weight.
"A coach who stations extra defenders along the sidelines and end zones but leaves a single midfielder anchoring the center."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 playing field divided into zones, each painted a different team color. Every zone matters equally in the original formation.
Do: Reinforce the flanks and the goal lines: any position touching the edge of the field gets a backup clone standing in the same spot. The heart of the pitch — the true center — stays occupied by a lone player. The formation swells outward without changing who stands where.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 field. Output is a 5×5 field. All colors (jerseys) remain; the perimeter positions are simply doubled.
"A pressure system whose outer bands intensify and widen while the eye remains eerily calm and singular."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 weather map — each cell a different atmospheric condition coded by color. A compact, self-contained system.
Do: The storm matures: its outermost bands swell, each replicating along the periphery as energy builds at the edges. The core of the system — the innermost cell — neither grows nor splits. The map expands as the storm's footprint bloats outward.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 system. Output is a 5×5 system. Colors (conditions) are unchanged; the boundary bands have thickened.
"A building whose corner pillars and outer walls are doubled in thickness for load-bearing, while the central atrium is left open and unadorned."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 floor plan — nine rooms, each with its own color-coded function. A simple, symmetrical blueprint.
Do: Reinforce the structure: the rooms along every exterior wall are widened, their footprint doubled as though buttressed from outside. The single room at the heart of the building keeps its original dimensions. The layout stretches but the room assignments never change.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 blueprint. Output is a 5×5 blueprint. Room colors persist; the perimeter has been structurally reinforced.
"A fortress that doubles its outer garrison walls but keeps only a single watchtower at the center of the keep."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 battlefield grid — each square held by a different colored regiment. A compact, even deployment.
Do: Fortify the perimeter: every unit along the border digs in, reinforcing its position so each edge cell holds twice the ground. The unit at dead center remains a single post. The entire formation expands outward as the front lines thicken.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 deployment. Output is a 5×5 deployment. Regimental colors hold; the borders are fortified.
"A stage where the actors on the wings and in the back row deliver each line twice for emphasis, while the soloist at center stage speaks once, crystal clear."
120b: k=1
See: A 3×3 stage — nine performers, each in a distinctly colored costume. They stand in a tight grid, equidistant.
Do: The director calls for dramatic weight at the margins: every performer along the edges of the stage echoes their presence, appearing to multiply. The lone figure at center stage remains singular and still. The tableau grows but the casting stays identical.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 cast. Output is a 5×5 tableau. Costume colors remain; the edge performers are doubled.
We need to infer rule from example. Input 3x3, output 5x5. Edge cells are duplicated (appear twice) expanding outward? Let's examine example. Input grid: Row1: B G X Row2: B R A Row3: A G A Output 5x5: Row1: B B G X X Row2: B B G X X Row3: B B R A A Row4: A A G ... wait let's write full output matrix. Given output lines: "B B G X X" "B B G X X" "B B R A A" "A A G A A" "A A G A A" Let's map coordinates. Output size 5x5. Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-4. Row0: col0 B, col1 B, col2 G, col3 X, col4 X Row1: same as row0. Row2: B B R A A Row3: A A G A A Row4: A A G A A Now, how derived from input? Input 3x3 coordinates (0-2). Edge cells: positions where row=0 or row=2 or col=0 or col=2. Center is (1,1) = R. Edge cells: (0,0)=B, (0,1)=G, (0,2)=X, (1,0)=B, (1,2)=A, (2,0)=A, (2,1)=G, (2,2)=A. The output seems to have each edge cell duplicated into a 2x2 block? Let's see. Take top-left corner B (0,0). In output, appears at rows0-1, cols0-1 as B B; B B (2x2 block). Indeed rows0-1 cols0-1 are B. Top edge middle G (0,1) appears at rows0-1, cols2? Actually output col2 row0-1 is G. That's a 2x1? Wait row0 col2 = G, row1 col2 = G. So G appears as vertical 2x1 block (since it's edge but not corner). Similarly X (0,2) appears at rows0-1, cols3-4? Actually row0 col3 X, col4 X; row1 col3 X, col4 X. That's a 2x2 block for corner? Wait (0,2) is top-right corner, should be 2x2 block at top right. Indeed rows0-1 cols3-4 are X. Now left edge middle B (1,0) appears at rows2-? Actually output rows2? Let's see rows2 col0-1 are B B (2x2 block). That's for left edge middle (1,0) becomes 2x2 block at rows2-3? Wait rows2-? Actually rows2 col0-1 B B, row3 col0-1 A A (different). So B appears only rows2 col0-1? Row2 col0 B, col1 B. Row3 col0 A not B. So B appears as a 1x2? Let's examine mapping more systematically. Maybe rule: each cell expands outward by one in each direction, but overlapping cells take precedence from original positions? Another view: output is like input scaled by factor 2, but center cell stays single (not scaled). Let's test scaling factor 2: If we double each dimension, 3x3 becomes 6x6, but output is 5x5, so not simple scaling. Maybe rule: Insert duplicate rows and columns between original rows/cols, but keep center unchanged? Let's try: Starting with 3x3, we want 5x5. Insert an extra row after each original row except after middle? Actually we need 2 extra rows and 2 extra columns. Could be that we duplicate the outer rows and columns (i.e., copy first and last rows/cols) to expand. Take input rows: r0: B G X r1: B R A r2: A G A Output rows: row0: B B G X X (looks like r0 with first element duplicated at start, last duplicated at end) row1: same as row0 (duplicate of row0) row2: B B R A A (looks like r1 with first duplicated, last duplicated) row3: A A G A A (looks like r2 with first duplicated, last duplicated) row4: same as row3 (duplicate of row2) So pattern: For each original row, we create two output rows: one is the row with first and ... [2989 chars truncated]
"A raised bed whose border plants are set in double rows for a lush hedge effect, while the centerpiece stands alone."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A 3×3 garden plot — nine plants, each a different color of bloom. A tidy square arrangement.
Do: Fill in the borders: every plant along the edge of the bed is paired with an identical clone beside it, thickening the garden's frame. The single plant at the very center stays solitary. The garden expands into a lusher, wider plot without introducing new varieties.
Grid: Input is a 3×3 bed. Output is a 5×5 bed. Bloom colors are unchanged; the perimeter rows are doubled.
See: The input grid is organized into two or more horizontal groups of 3×3 colored blocks, separated by rows of all-black cells. Within each group, there are N colored blocks (e.g., R, G, B, X) arranged left to right, each occupying a 3×3 region and separated by a single column of black cells. Every block uses exactly one non-black color but has its own unique pattern of filled and empty cells within its 3×3 space. The same set of colors appears in the same left-to-right order in every group. From one group to the next, the patterns (filled/empty arrangements) shift cyclically among the color positions: each color adopts the pattern that belonged to the color immediately to its right in the previous group, with the rightmost color's pattern wrapping around to the leftmost color.
Do: 1. Identify the horizontal groups separated by all-black rows. Each group is exactly 3 rows tall. 2. Within each group, identify the N colored 3×3 blocks arranged left to right, noting their color order (e.g., R, G, B, X). 3. Extract the 3×3 pattern (which cells are filled vs. black) for each color block in the last group. 4. Produce the output by applying one more cyclic left-shift of patterns: assign to each color position the pattern that belonged to the color one step to its right in the last group. The rightmost color receives the pattern from the leftmost color. 5. Render the output as a single 3-row group with the same color order and column spacing, filling each color's 3×3 region with its new pattern in that color.
Grid: The input grid has a width of (N × 3 + (N−1)) columns, where N is the number of colored blocks per group, and a height of (G × 3 + (G+1)) rows, where G is the number of groups (the extra rows are all-black separator rows including top and bottom borders). The output grid is always exactly 3 rows tall and the same width as the input, containing a single group with no surrounding black separator rows. The background color is black (.).
"A dance troupe passes choreography down the line at each rehearsal, and the final performance reveals the next routine."
120b: k=1
See: Troupes of colored dancers—R, G, B, and sometimes X—stand in a line on a dark stage, each performing their own signature 3×3 choreography. The stage is divided into rehearsal rounds stacked vertically, separated by blackout curtains. In each new round, every dancer has learned the moves of the neighbor to their right, while the dancer on the far right loops back to mimic the one on the far left—a rolling relay of stolen choreography passing through the lineup.
Do: Watch the dancers rehearse through all their rounds, paying close attention to the final rehearsal. Now predict the opening night performance: each dancer steps forward wearing their own color but performing the choreography that belonged to the dancer one step to their right in that last rehearsal. The dancer at the end of the line inherits the first dancer's routine, completing the circle. The curtain rises on a single, final performance—no blackouts, no intermissions.
Grid: The dark stage spans enough room for each dancer's 3×3 spotlight with a single dark column between them. Blackout rows frame each rehearsal round top and bottom. Opening night strips away all the darkness—just one three-row performance under the lights, same stage width, no curtains.
We need to understand the puzzle. Input grid includes multiple "rehearsal rounds" separated by rows of all '.' (black). In example 1, input has 5 rows? Let's examine. Example 1 Input (as shown): ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So 5 rows, 15 columns. The pattern: first row all '.' (top blackout). Then three rows of data (the three rows of each dancer's 3x3 choreography? Actually each dancer occupies a 3x3 block with a column of '.' between dancers). Then bottom row all '.' (bottom blackout). So there are 3 data rows (height of choreography). The output is 3 rows (no black rows). Output given: "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X" "R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X" "R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X" That's also 3 rows, 15 columns. So transformation: For each dancer column (i.e., each 3x3 block), we need to shift the block's pattern to the left? Actually description: each dancer inherits choreography of dancer to right in final rehearsal. The final rehearsal is the last round before output? In example, there is only one round? Actually input has only one round (since only one set of data rows). But description says multiple rounds stacked vertically separated by blackout rows. In example 1, there is only one round (the three rows). So the final rehearsal is that same round. Then output: each dancer's 3x3 block is replaced by the block of the dancer to its right (wrapping). Let's test. Identify dancer blocks: In input, we have columns with colors: Let's map columns indices 0-14. Row1 (index1): "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" Row2: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" Row3: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" We need to parse 3x3 blocks separated by a column of '.' (maybe multiple '.'?). Let's locate '.' columns that separate. At column 3 is '.' after first block? Let's see columns: col0 R, col1 R, col2 R, col3 ., col4 G, col5 ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 B, col9 ., col10 ., col11 ., col12 X, col13 ., col14 X Seems pattern: each dancer's block width 3 columns, then a single '.' column separator. So first dancer occupies cols0-2 (R,R,R; .,.; .,.)? Actually rows: first dancer block (3x3) should be: Rows: R R R . . R . . R That's a shape: a vertical line on right side? That's the block for dancer 1 (color maybe R?). Indeed block contains R's only. Second dancer block columns 4-6? Let's see col4 G, col5 ., col6 .; row2 col4 G, col5 ., col6 .; row3 col4 G, col5 G, col6 G. So block: G . . G . . G G G That's a shape for G dancer. Third dancer block columns 8-10: col8 B, col9 ., col10 .; row2 col8 ., col9 B, col10 B; row3 col8 B, col9 ., col10 . . So block: B . . . B B B . . That's B dancer. Fourth dancer block columns 12-14: col12 X, col13 ., col14 X; row2 col12 X, col13 ., col14 X; row3 col12 X, col13 ., col14 X. So block: X . X X . X X . X That's X dancer. Now output rows: Let's extract blocks after transformation. Output rows: Row1 ... [10790 chars truncated]
"Cells in a tissue pass their expressed phenotypes to the neighbor on their left during each division cycle. After the final mitosis, predict what the next generation's expression will look like."
120b: fail
See: Rows of colored cell colonies sit in layered petri dishes, separated by empty agar bands. Each colony has its own unique protein-fold shape rendered in a single stain color. The same species appear in the same order on every dish, but their shapes keep migrating.
Do: Observe the inheritance pattern across dishes. After the last dish, perform one more handoff: each colony receives the shape from the colony to its right, with the rightmost inheriting from the leftmost. Culture only the resulting generation.
Grid: Each colony is a 3×3 region of stained (colored) and unstained (black) cells. Dishes are 3-row bands separated by empty (all-black) rows. The output is a single 3-row dish.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3-row bands separated by a blank row (all black). Each band contains several 3x3 colonies placed side by side? Actually each colony is 3x3 region of colored and black cells. The dishes are 3-row bands separated by empty rows (all black). Output is a single 3-row dish (i.e., one band). The rule: "After the last dish, perform one more handoff: each colony receives the shape from the colony to its right, with the rightmost inheriting from the leftmost. Culture only the resulting generation." Interpretation: For each 3x3 colony, we need to replace its pattern with the pattern of the colony to its right (within the same row of colonies?) across the whole input? The input has multiple dishes (bands). The colonies appear in same order on every dish. So each column of colonies (i.e., same position across dishes) is same species (color). The shapes (patterns) migrate across dishes (i.e., each dish's colony shape is derived from previous dish's colony? Not needed). The rule: after the last dish, we do one more handoff: each colony receives the shape from the colony to its right, with the rightmost inheriting from the leftmost. Then output only the resulting generation (i.e., the new dish after this handoff). So we need to take the last dish (the bottommost 3-row band before final blank row?) Actually input includes multiple dishes separated by blank rows, and after the last dish we need to produce a new dish (output) which is the result of shifting colony patterns to the right (circular) within that last dish? Wait "each colony receives the shape from the colony to its right, with the rightmost inheriting from the leftmost." That suggests we take the set of colonies (in order left to right) from the last dish, and rotate their patterns rightwards (i.e., each colony gets pattern of its right neighbor, and the rightmost gets pattern of leftmost). Then output that new dish. But examples: Let's test. Example1 Input: Let's parse. Input grid size? Provided as rows with spaces. Let's reconstruct. Rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X 3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X 4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X 5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Output rows (3 rows): Row1: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X Now let's identify dishes. Input has 5 rows: first row all dots? Actually row1 is all dots (black). Row2-4 contain data (3 rows). Row5 is all dots (separator). So there is one dish? Wait there is a blank row after the dish. The description says dishes are 3-row bands separated by empty rows. So there may be multiple dishes stacked vertically. In Example1, we have rows: row1 all dots (maybe empty row before first dish). Then rows2-4 are dish1. Row5 empty row after dish1. No more rows. So only one dish? But rule says after the last dish, perform handoff. So we take the only dish (the last) and rotate patterns. O ... [10848 chars truncated]
"Planets in a resonant chain swap their ring configurations with their outward neighbor at each conjunction. Predict the rings after the next alignment."
120b: fail
See: Colored planets sit in a fixed orbital sequence across multiple conjunction snapshots, separated by void bands. Each planet has a unique ring structure in its spectral color, but the structures shift between planets at each conjunction.
Do: Map the ring-swapping pattern. After the last conjunction, apply one more exchange: each planet takes the ring structure from the planet to its right, with the outermost wrapping to the innermost. Show only the resulting configuration.
Grid: Each planet is a 3×3 block of colored (ring material) and black (void) cells. Conjunctions are 3-row bands separated by void (black) rows. Output is one 3-row snapshot.
We need to infer rule. From examples. We have grid with multiple 3x3 blocks separated by empty rows (all .). Input shows several snapshots (conjunctions). Output is a single 3-row snapshot (presumably after transformation). Need to map ring-swapping pattern: each planet (3x3 block) has a "ring structure" pattern of colors (non-black cells) that shift between planets across snapshots. The rule: after last conjunction, apply one more exchange: each planet takes the ring structure from the planet to its right, with outermost wrapping to innermost. Interpretation: We have sequence of snapshots (conjunctions) each being a row of 3x3 blocks? Actually each snapshot is 3 rows tall (since each planet is 3x3). The input shows multiple snapshots stacked vertically separated by a blank row (all .). So each snapshot consists of 3 rows of blocks side by side? Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions: appears 4 rows? Actually given lines: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 columns). second line "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". third line ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X". fourth line ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X". fifth line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". That's 5 rows. So there is a blank row after 3 rows of data (snapshot). So snapshot is rows 2-4 (3 rows). There are 3 planets side by side? Let's see columns: 15 columns, maybe 5 columns per planet (including a column of void between?). Let's segment: maybe each planet 3 columns wide, with a column of . separator? Let's examine row2: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". Break into groups of 4? Actually pattern: first planet: columns 1-3 = R R R (top row of planet). column4 = . separator. Next planet: columns5-7 = G . .? Wait column5 is G, column6 is ., column7 is . . That's weird. Let's map indices: Row2 tokens: 1 R,2 R,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X. So after first planet (3 cols), a separator column (col4). Then second planet maybe columns5-7: G . . (top row). Then separator column8? col8 is . (makes sense). Third planet columns9-11: B . . (top row). Separator column12? col12 is . . Actually col12 is . (makes sense). Fourth planet columns13-15: X . X (top row). So there are 4 planets in this snapshot. Similarly rows3 and 4 give their 3x3 patterns. Thus each snapshot consists of 4 planets (maybe variable). The output is also 3 rows with same number of planets? Example1 output has 3 rows, 15 columns as well. Let's see output row1: "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X". That's 15 tokens. So same 4 planets but transformed. Now need to understand transformation: "ring-swapping pattern" across snapshots. There are multiple snapshots (conjunctions) in input: In Example1, there is only one snapshot? Actually there is only one blank row after the 3 rows, no further snapshot. So maybe the input includes multiple snapshots stacked vertically, and we need to map pattern of ring structures across snapshots (i.e., each planet's pattern changes over time). Then after last snapsho ... [11677 chars truncated]
"Ships in a convoy pass their signal flag arrangements to the vessel on their port side each watch. Hoist the flags for the next watch."
120b: fail
See: Colored ships hold station in a fixed sequence across multiple watches, separated by calm water. Each ship flies a unique flag pattern in its hull color, but the patterns circulate down the convoy between watches.
Do: Decode the signal-passing rule. After the final watch, execute one more pass: each ship hoists the flag pattern from the ship to its right (starboard), with the last ship wrapping to the first. Display only that watch.
Grid: Each ship is a 3×3 block of colored (flags) and black (empty rigging) cells. Watches are 3-row bands separated by calm (black) rows. Output is one 3-row watch.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple "watches" (3-row blocks) separated by a row of all '.' (black). Each watch contains ships: each ship is a 3x3 block of colored cells (non-black) with black cells inside? Actually description: each ship is a 3×3 block of colored (flags) and black (empty rigging) cells. So each ship occupies a 3x3 region, possibly with some black cells inside (like shape). In examples, we see pattern: In each watch, there are three ships side by side horizontally? Let's examine Example1. Input grid lines (16 columns?). Let's reconstruct. Example1 Input (as given): Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Output (3 rows): Row1: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X So input had 5 rows: top row all '.' (maybe separator before first watch?), then rows 2-4 contain three ships? Actually there are 3 rows of ship data (rows2-4) then a separator row (row5). Output is 3 rows (the watch after transformation). So the input includes a watch (rows2-4) and maybe preceding empty row? Wait they said watches are 3-row bands separated by calm (black) rows. So there is a black row before each watch? In example1, row1 is black row, then rows2-4 watch1, then row5 black row (maybe after). Output is just the watch after transformation (the next watch after final watch). So we need to take the watch(s) present? Actually there is only one watch in input (rows2-4). Output is transformed watch (rows?). So rule: shift flag patterns (colored cells) among ships to the right (starboard) after final watch, then display that watch. Thus we need to identify each ship's pattern (the arrangement of colors within its 3x3 block). Then shift each ship's pattern to the right neighbor (wrapping). The colors themselves stay same? Actually each ship has a hull color (the main color of its block) and flag pattern (maybe arrangement of other colors). In description: "Each ship is a 3×3 block of colored (flags) and black (empty rigging) cells. ... each ship flies a unique flag pattern in its hull color, but the patterns circulate down the convoy between watches." So each ship's hull color is the dominant color? In examples, each ship seems to have a primary color (R, G, B, X) and within that block there are other colors? Let's examine Example1 watch rows2-4. Let's map columns. Row2: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" Indices: 1 R,2 R,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X Row3: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" Row4: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" We can see three ships: first ship columns1-3? Actually columns1-3 have R's forming a shape. That's a red ship. Second ship columns5-7? column5 G, column6 ., column7 . maybe shape of green ship. Third ship columns9-11? column9 B, column10 ., column11 . maybe blue ship. Fourth ... [10174 chars truncated]
"Registers in a shift chain pass their bit patterns one position left on each clock pulse. Read the output after the next tick."
120b: k=3
See: Colored registers sit in a fixed bus order across multiple clock cycles, separated by dead bands. Each register holds a unique bit pattern rendered in its indicator color, but the patterns propagate through the chain between cycles.
Do: Trace the shifting pattern. After the last clock cycle, apply one more tick: each register loads the bit pattern from the register to its right, with the last wrapping to the first. Output only the resulting register state.
Grid: Each register is a 3×3 block of colored (high) and black (low) cells. Clock cycles are 3-row bands separated by dead (black) rows. Output is one 3-row cycle.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3-row cycles separated by a blank row (all .). Each cycle is 3 rows tall, each register is a 3x3 block? Actually description: each register is 3x3 block of colored (high) and black (low) cells. Clock cycles are 3-row bands separated by dead (black) rows. Output is one 3-row cycle. So input contains multiple cycles (maybe 2 cycles). Need to trace shifting pattern: "After the last clock cycle, apply one more tick: each register loads the bit pattern from the register to its right, with the last wrapping to the first. Output only the resulting register state." Thus we need to identify registers within each cycle: each register is a 3x3 block. Within a cycle, registers are placed horizontally across columns, separated maybe by a column of black? Let's examine Example 1. Example1 Input grid dimensions: appears 5 rows? Actually given lines: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 columns). second line "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". third line ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X". fourth line ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X". fifth line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". So 5 rows, 15 columns. The dead row is row5 (all .). So there is one cycle of 3 rows (rows2-4) and then dead row. Output is 3 rows (same width 15). Output rows: "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X", etc. Thus we need to parse registers: In the input cycle rows2-4, there are three registers? Let's locate colored blocks of size 3x3. For example, red block at left: rows2-4 columns1-3? Row2: R R R, row3: . . R, row4: . . R. That's a 3x3 block with pattern: top row all R, middle row last column R, bottom row last column R. That's a shape like a vertical line on right side plus top row full. That's a pattern. Next register green maybe columns5-7? Row2 col5 G, row3 col5 G, row4 col5 G G G? Actually row2 col5 is G, row3 col5 G, row4 col5 G G G (col5-7). So block columns5-7 rows2-4: pattern: top row: G . .? Wait row2 col5 G, col6 ., col7 . (since row2 string "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X": after G there is space then . then . then .? Let's map columns: Let's index columns 1-15. Row2 tokens: 1 R,2 R,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X. Row3: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" Tokens:1 .,2 .,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 B,11 B,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X Row4: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" Tokens:1 .,2 .,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X Thus green block columns5-7 rows2-4: Row2: col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; Row3: col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; Row4: col5 G, col6 G, col7 G. That's similar shape as red but shifted? Actually red block columns1-3 rows2-4: Row2: R R R ; Row3: . . R ; Row4: . . R. So red top row full, right column vertical line. Green top row only leftmost cell? Wait top row of green block is G . . (only leftmost). So not same orientation. Hmm. Blue block columns9-11? Row2 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . ; Row3 col9 ., col10 B, col11 B ; Row4 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . . So pattern: top row B . . ; ... [10041 chars truncated]
"Gods seated at a divine council pass their sacred emblems to the deity on their left at each age of the world. Reveal the emblems of the coming age."
120b: k=4
See: Colored deities sit in a fixed pantheon order across multiple ages, separated by twilight bands. Each deity bears a unique emblem shape in their divine color, but the emblems circulate through the council between ages.
Do: Follow the emblem passing. After the last age, enact one more transfer: each deity receives the emblem from the deity to their right, with the last wrapping to the first. Show only the new age's council.
Grid: Each deity is a 3×3 block of colored (emblem) and black (void) cells. Ages are 3-row bands separated by twilight (black) rows. Output is one 3-row age.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid contains multiple ages separated by a row of all '.' (black) rows? In examples, there are 5 rows total? Let's examine Example1. Input grid dimensions? Provided as lines with spaces. Example1 Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So 5 rows, 15 columns. The middle rows (rows 2-4) contain three 3x3 blocks? Let's see: Age1 maybe rows 2-4? Actually there are three ages? The description: Ages are 3-row bands separated by twilight (black) rows. So each age occupies 3 rows. The input includes a top black row, then 3 rows of data, then a bottom black row. That's one age? Wait there are 5 rows: top black row, then 3 rows (age), then bottom black row. So only one age present? But output is also 3 rows (age). So transformation takes the input which includes a top and bottom black rows (twilight) and maybe multiple ages? In examples 2, input has 9 rows? Let's count. Example2 Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . ." "R . R . G . . . B B B" ". R . . G G G . . B ." "R . R . . . G . . B ." ". . . . . . . . . . ." "R . . . G G G . B . B" "R R R . . G . . . B ." ". . R . . G . . B . B" ". . . . . . . . . . ." That's 9 rows, 11 columns. So there are two ages: rows 2-4 (first age), rows 6-8 (second age). Row5 is black separator. Row1 and row9 are black borders. Output is 3 rows (one age). Which age? According to description: "Show only the new age's council." The transformation: "After the last age, enact one more transfer: each deity receives the emblem from the deity to their right, with the last wrapping to the first." So we have multiple ages (councils). Emblem shapes circulate through the council between ages. So each deity (block) has an emblem shape (pattern of colored cells within its 3x3 block). The emblem passes from one deity to the next across ages? Let's decode. In each age, there are multiple deities (blocks) arranged horizontally? In example1, there are three deities: red, green, blue, X? Actually there are four colors: R, G, B, X. Let's view the 3x3 blocks. Rows 2-4, columns maybe 1-3 for R block, columns 5-7 for G block, columns 9-11 for B block, columns 13-15 for X block. Indeed each block is 3 columns wide, separated by a column of '.'? Let's check row2: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". That's 15 columns. Pattern: columns 1-3 R, column4 '.' separator, column5 G, column6 '.'? Actually there is "G . . ." maybe G at col5, then '.' at col6, '.' at col7? Wait we need to map. Let's index: row2 tokens: 1 R,2 R,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X. So each block maybe not contiguous? The pattern seems each block's emblem occupies some cells within its 3x3 area, but the rest are '.' (black). The block area includes the 3 columns (e.g., columns 1-3 for first block). Within that, the emblem shape is defined by colored cells (R). For other blocks, the color is G ... [9485 chars truncated]
"Performers in a line trade their signature poses with the dancer beside them at every beat change. Strike the pose after the final beat."
120b: fail
See: Colored dancers hold positions in a fixed line across multiple beats, separated by stillness. Each dancer holds a unique pose silhouette in their costume color, but poses travel along the line between beats.
Do: Track the pose migration. After the last beat, advance one more: each dancer takes the pose from the dancer to their right, with the end wrapping to the beginning. Freeze only that moment.
Grid: Each dancer is a 3×3 block of colored (body) and black (empty space) cells. Beats are 3-row bands separated by stillness (black) rows. Output is one 3-row beat.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3x3 blocks (dancers) arranged in rows, separated by a blank row (all .) between beats. Each beat is a 3-row band of blocks. The output is a single 3-row beat (i.e., the result after transformation). The rule: "After the last beat, advance one more: each dancer takes the pose from the dancer to their right, with the end wrapping to the beginning. Freeze only that moment." Interpretation: We have a sequence of beats (time steps). Each beat is a 3-row band of 3x3 blocks (dancers). Within each beat, each dancer has a pose (pattern of colored cells within its 3x3 block). Over beats, the pose moves along the line (i.e., horizontally across dancers) from left to right each beat? Actually "poses travel along the line between beats." So each beat shows the pose shifted right by one dancer relative to previous beat. The transformation: after the last beat, we advance one more (i.e., compute the next beat) where each dancer takes the pose from the dancer to their right (i.e., shift left? Wait: each dancer takes pose from dancer to their right, meaning the pose moves leftwards? Let's think: If dancer A takes pose from dancer to its right (B), then after shift, A's pose becomes B's previous pose. So the pose moves left (from right to left). Equivalent to shifting the sequence of poses one position left, wrapping around. But we need to verify with examples. Example 1: Input grid: Let's parse. Input rows (15 columns?). Actually they show 15 columns. Let's reconstruct. Rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X 3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X 4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X 5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Output rows (3 rows): Row1: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X We need to see beats. Input has 3 rows of data (rows 2-4) then a blank row (row5). So there is only one beat? Wait they said beats are 3-row bands separated by stillness rows. In example 1, there is only one beat (rows 2-4). Output is also 3 rows (one beat). So transformation is within a single beat? But description says "After the last beat, advance one more: each dancer takes the pose from the dancer to their right, with the end wrapping to the beginning." So we need to shift poses within the beat. Thus we need to identify dancers: each dancer is a 3x3 block. In a beat, there are multiple dancers placed horizontally across columns, separated by maybe a column of black? Let's examine example 1 rows 2-4. Write them as grid 3x? Let's list columns 1-15. Row2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X We need to partition into 3x3 blocks. Likely each dancer occupies 3 columns width, with a column of '.' between dancers? Let's try. Columns 1-3: first dancer (R,R,R; .,.,R; .,.,R) forms a shape of red vertical line? Actually pattern: rows2-4, cols1-3: Row2: R R R Row3: . . R Ro ... [10887 chars truncated]
"Mineral veins in layered strata pass their crystal habits to the vein on their left with each epoch of metamorphism. Predict the crystals after the next epoch."
120b: fail
See: Colored mineral veins sit in a fixed sequence across multiple strata, separated by barren rock layers. Each vein has a unique crystal habit in its mineral color, but the habits shift between veins from stratum to stratum.
Do: Trace the crystal migration across strata. After the deepest stratum, project one more epoch: each vein adopts the crystal habit from the vein to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost. Expose only the resulting stratum.
Grid: Each vein is a 3×3 block of colored (crystal) and black (matrix) cells. Strata are 3-row bands separated by barren (black) rows. Output is one 3-row stratum.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3x3 blocks (veins) arranged horizontally across rows, separated by black rows (all .). Each stratum is 3 rows tall, then a black row separator. So we have multiple strata (layers). Within each stratum, there are several 3x3 blocks (veins) placed side by side, maybe with a column of black between? Actually description: "Each vein is a 3×3 block of colored (crystal) and black (matrix) cells. Strata are 3-row bands separated by barren (black) rows." So each 3x3 block may be adjacent horizontally with no spacing? In examples, there are spaces (.) between blocks? Let's examine Example1 input. Example1 Input grid (looks 5 rows? Actually they show 5 rows: first row all .; second row: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X"; third row: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X"; fourth row: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X"; fifth row all .). So there are 5 rows: top black row, then 3 rows of data, then bottom black row. So one stratum (3 rows) between black rows. Within those 3 rows, there are multiple 3x3 blocks separated by a column of .? Let's parse. Columns: Let's index. Row2: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". That's 15 columns? Count: R(1) space R(2) space R(3) space .(4) space G(5) space .(6) space .(7) space .(8) space B(9) space .(10) space .(11) space .(12) space X(13) space .(14) space X(15). So 15 columns. Now 3x3 blocks would be columns 1-3 (first block), columns 5-7 (second block), columns 9-11 (third block), columns 13-15 (fourth block). Indeed each block separated by a single column of . (col4, col8, col12). So pattern: block, separator column of ., block, separator, block, separator, block. Thus each stratum contains 4 veins (blocks). Good. Now output for Example1 is also 3 rows (one stratum). Output rows: "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X" etc. Let's see pattern: they have same number of columns (15). So they output a single stratum after transformation. Now rule: "After the deepest stratum, project one more epoch: each vein adopts the crystal habit from the vein to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost. Expose only the resulting stratum." Interpretation: We have multiple strata (layers). For each vein (block) we look at the vein directly below it? Wait "Trace the crystal migration across strata. After the deepest stratum, project one more epoch: each vein adopts the crystal habit from the vein to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost." So we need to see how veins change from one stratum to the next (i.e., mapping of colors). Then after the last stratum, we apply one more step where each vein takes the pattern of the vein to its right (within same stratum?) Actually "after the deepest stratum, project one more epoch: each vein adopts the crystal habit from the vein to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost." That suggests we treat the sequence of veins across strata as moving downwards (migration). The "rightmost wrapping to the leftmost" ... [9811 chars truncated]
"Chefs at a long counter rotate their plating styles one seat to the left with each course. Predict the plating of the next course after the meal ends."
120b: fail
See: Identical ingredients sit at stations along the counter in the same order every course. Each station's garnish arrangement is distinct, but the arrangements migrate steadily down the line between courses, separated by clean passes of the counter.
Do: Study how the garnish patterns travel between courses. After the last course, apply one more rotation—each station adopts the arrangement from the station to its right, wrapping around—and present only that final plate.
Grid: Each station is a 3×3 block of colored (garnished) and black (empty plate) cells. Courses are 3-row bands divided by blank rows. Output is one 3-row course.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid consists of stations 3x3 blocks, courses are 3-row bands separated by blank rows (all .). Input has multiple courses (maybe 3?). Output is one 3-row course (the final after rotation). The rule: "garnish patterns travel between courses. After the last course, apply one more rotation—each station adopts the arrangement from the station to its right, wrapping around—and present only that final plate." Interpretation: Each station is a 3x3 block. Within each course (3 rows), there are multiple stations horizontally across columns, separated by maybe a column of .? Actually looking at example 1 input: grid width 16? Let's examine. Example1 Input lines (I'll index). Provided as rows with spaces. Let's reconstruct. Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row2: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row3: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X Row4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row5: (output? Wait example includes only input then output). Actually example1 input includes rows 0-4? Let's count: they show 5 rows input (0-4). Output 3 rows. So there is one course? Actually there is a blank row (row4) after the 3 rows of data (rows1-3). So the 3 rows of data constitute a course. The blank row separates courses. In example1, there is only one course? But output is 3 rows derived from that course after some transformation (maybe rotation of stations). Let's examine pattern. We need to identify stations: 3x3 blocks. In a 3-row band, each station is 3 columns wide? Let's look at row1-3 columns. Row1: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row2: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row3: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X Let's segment into 3x3 blocks: columns 0-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, 12-14, 15-? Actually width 16 columns (0-15). Let's group 3 columns each: 0-2 (first block), 3-5 (second), 6-8 (third), 9-11 (fourth), 12-14 (fifth), 15-? leftover column 15 maybe part of block? But pattern maybe stations are separated by a column of .? Let's examine column 3 is '.' in row1, row2 '.' row3 '.' So column3 is blank separator. Similarly column6? Row1 column6 '.' row2 column6 '.' row3 column6 '.'? Row1 col6 '.' yes, row2 col6 '.' row3 col6 '.' So separators at columns 3,6,9,12,15? Let's check column9: row1 col9 '.' row2 col9 'B' (not .) So not separator. Hmm. Maybe stations are 3x3 but there is a column of . between them, making each station 3 columns plus 1 separator, so width = n*4 -1? Let's test: Suppose stations count = 4? Then width = 4*3 + 3 separators = 12+3=15. Input width 16 maybe includes trailing .? Let's compute: columns 0-2 station1, column3 separator, columns4-6 station2, column7 separator, columns8-10 station3, column11 separator, columns12-14 station4, column15 maybe extra? Let's map. Take row1: indices: 0 R 1 R 2 R 3 . 4 G 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 B 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 X 13 . 14 X 15 (maybe nothing) Actually row length 16 includes column15 maybe empty? In row1 after X at col14 there is space then maybe nothing ... [9475 chars truncated]
"In a round, each voice picks up the melody that the voice to its right just finished singing. The encore reveals the next passage."
120b: fail
See: Colored instrument sections sit side by side in repeated staves separated by rests. Each section plays a unique rhythmic figure in its own timbre, but the figures circulate through the sections from one stave to the next.
Do: Track which rhythmic figure each section inherits between staves. After the final stave, let each section take up the figure from its right neighbor (the last section wraps to the first) and write out that single stave.
Grid: Each section is a 3×3 region; notes are colored cells, silences are black. Staves are 3-row horizontal bands separated by rest rows (all black). Output is one stave.
We need to understand puzzle. The description: grid with sections 3x3, staves separated by rows of all black (.). Input has multiple staves (horizontal bands) each 3 rows tall, separated by a row of all black. Each stave contains several sections side by side (columns of width 3). Each section is a 3x3 region with colored cells (notes) and black cells (silence). The transformation: "Track which rhythmic figure each section inherits between staves. After the final stave, let each section take up the figure from its right neighbor (the last section wraps to the first) and write out that single stave." Interpretation: For each 3x3 section, there is a pattern (figure) that may change from one stave to the next, moving rightwards? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input: Let's parse dimensions. Input lines: first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 columns). Then rows 2-4 contain data, row5 all black separator, rows6-8 maybe? Actually example1 input shows 5 rows total? Wait they show: Input: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Output: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X So input has 5 rows: row1 all black, rows2-4 have data, row5 all black. So there is one stave? Actually there is a top black row (maybe rest row) then 3 rows of data (stave), then bottom black row (separator). Output is 3 rows (single stave). So transformation: we have multiple staves? In this example only one stave? But output derived by shifting sections? Let's examine sections: width 3 each. Input width 15 columns => 5 sections (since 5*3=15). Let's label sections 1-5. Extract each 3x3 region (rows2-4, columns 1-3 etc). Let's compute. I'll write rows2-4: Row2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X Now sections: Section1 columns1-3: Rows2-4: R R R . . R . . R That's pattern. Section2 columns4-6: col4-6 values: Row2: . G . Row3: . G . Row4: . G G So pattern: . G . . G . . G G Section3 columns7-9: Row2: . . B Row3: . . . Row4: . B . Pattern: . . B . . . . B . Section4 columns10-12: Row2: . . . Row3: B B . Row4: . . . Pattern: . . . B B . . . . Section5 columns13-15: Row2: X . X Row3: X . X Row4: X . X Pattern: X . X X . X X . X Now output rows (3 rows) columns 15? Output: Row1: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X Let's split into sections of width3: Section1 output cols1-3: R . . R . . R R R? Wait need to map. Let's write rows: Row1 output: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X Now sections: Sec1 (cols1-3): Rows: R . R . R R R? Actually rows: Row1 col1-3 = R . . ; Row2 col1-3 = R . . ; Row3 col1-3 = R R R. So pattern: R . . R . . R R R Sec2 (cols4-6): Row1: . G . Row2: . . G Ro ... [8852 chars truncated]
"Relay runners pass batons in a circle—each leg, every runner carries the baton style of the teammate who just ran to their right. Show the handoff after the final leg."
120b: fail
See: Teams in colored jerseys line up in lanes across multiple heats, separated by rest intervals. Each runner has a unique stride pattern in their color, but these patterns shift systematically between heats.
Do: Follow the baton pass pattern across heats. After the last heat, execute one more handoff: each lane adopts the stride pattern from the lane to its right, wrapping the last to the first. Display only the resulting heat.
Grid: Each lane is a 3×3 colored/black pattern block. Heats are 3-row horizontal bands separated by blank rows. Output is a single 3-row heat.
We need to infer rule. From description: lanes are 3x3 blocks, heats are horizontal bands separated by blank rows (all .?). Input grids have multiple heats (3 rows each) separated by a row of all '.' (blank). Output is a single 3-row heat (i.e., one band). The rule: "Follow the baton pass pattern across heats. After the last heat, execute one more handoff: each lane adopts the stride pattern from the lane to its right, wrapping the last to the first." Interpretation: For each heat, there are lanes (columns) each lane is a 3x3 block. The pattern (the 3x3 block) shifts between heats according to some pattern (maybe each lane's pattern moves to next lane?). The baton pass across heats: maybe each lane's pattern moves down to next heat? Let's examine examples. We need to parse example 1. Input example1: Let's reconstruct. Provided as lines with spaces? Input grid 4 rows? Actually they show 5 rows? Let's count. Example1 Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So 5 rows, 15 columns. The blank row is row5 all '.'? Actually row5 is all '.' (separator after heat?). The heat is rows 2-4 (3 rows). So there is only one heat? Wait there is also top row all '.' maybe preceding blank? Row1 all '.' maybe preceding blank? Actually row1 is all '.' as well. So there are two blank rows: row1 and row5. So the heat is rows2-4. Output is 3 rows (same as heat). So rule maybe extracts the heat and transforms lanes within that heat based on pattern across heats? But there is only one heat in example1, yet transformation occurs (output differs from input). So there must be multiple heats within input: maybe each heat is 3 rows, but there are multiple heats stacked vertically, separated by a single blank row. In example1, there are 2 blank rows (row1 and row5). That suggests there are two heats: rows2-4 is first heat, rows? Actually after row5 blank, there is no more rows. So only one heat. Hmm. But output differs: Let's compare input heat rows2-4 to output rows. Input heat: Row2: R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X Row3: . . R . G . . . . B B . X . X Row4: . . R . G G G . B . . . X . X Output: Row1: R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X Row2: R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X Row3: R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X We need to see lane structure. Lanes are 3x3 blocks. Since each lane is 3 columns wide? Actually 3x3 block: width 3 columns, height 3 rows. So each lane occupies 3 columns across the 3 rows of a heat. So the heat width is multiple of 3 columns. In example1, width 15 columns => 5 lanes. Let's segment columns into groups of 3: Columns 1-3,4-6,7-9,10-12,13-15. Let's extract each lane's 3x3 pattern from input heat. I'll label lanes L1..L5. L1 (cols1-3): Rows2-4: Row2: R R R Row3: . . R Row4: . . R So pattern: R R R . . R . . R L2 (cols4-6): Rows2-4: Row2: . G . Row3: . G . Row4: . G G Pattern: . G . . G . . G G L3 (cols7-9): Rows2-4: Row2: ... [9356 chars truncated]
"Storm fronts traveling along a jet stream trade their cloud formations with the system to their west each day. Forecast tomorrow's sky."
120b: k=2
See: Colored weather systems sit in a fixed east-to-west sequence across multiple daily snapshots, divided by calm bands. Each system has a unique cloud formation in its signature color, but formations drift between systems from day to day.
Do: Observe how formations migrate between daily snapshots. After the last snapshot, advance one more day: each system inherits the formation from the system to its right (east), wrapping the easternmost to the westernmost. Show only that forecast.
Grid: Each system is a 3×3 block of colored (cloud) and black (clear) cells. Days are 3-row bands separated by calm (black) rows. Output is one 3-row day.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple days (snapshots) separated by a row of all '.' (black) rows? In examples, there are 5 rows total: first row all '.'? Let's examine Example1. Input (given as lines): ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." So 5 rows, 15 columns. The middle three rows (rows 2-4) are a day? Actually description: days are 3-row bands separated by calm (black) rows. So there is a black row at top and bottom? In example1, first row all '.' (black) is calm band before first day? Then rows 2-4 are day1? Then row5 is calm after? So only one day present? Output is also 3 rows (a day). So rule: shift each 3x3 block (system) to the left? Wait description: "colored weather systems sit in a fixed east-to-west sequence across multiple daily snapshots, divided by calm bands. Each system has a unique cloud formation in its signature color, but formations drift between systems from day to day. What to do: Observe how formations migrate between daily snapshots. After the last snapshot, advance one more day: each system inherits the formation from the system to its right (east), wrapping the easternmost to the westernmost. Show only that forecast." Thus we have multiple days (snapshots) stacked vertically. Each day consists of a sequence of 3x3 blocks (systems) arranged horizontally (east-west). The blocks are separated by maybe a column of '.'? Not sure. In example1, we have 3 systems? Let's parse. Rows 2-4 (3 rows) contain pattern: columns maybe groups of 3? Let's segment columns into 3-col blocks: columns 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-15. That's 5 blocks. The description says fixed east-to-west sequence across multiple daily snapshots, divided by calm bands. The calm bands are rows, not columns. So each system is a 3x3 block, but there may be empty columns (black) between them? In example1, look at block 1 (cols1-3): rows2-4 show: Row2: R R R Row3: . . R Row4: . . R That's a red system with formation shape (R's). Block2 (cols4-6): columns 4-6 values: Row2: . G . Row3: . G . Row4: . G G That's green system with formation shape (some G). Block3 (cols7-9): Row2: . . . Row3: . . . Row4: . . . All '.'? Actually column7-9 are all '.' maybe representing empty? Wait row2 col7 is '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'; row3 col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.'; row4 col7 '.'; col8 '.'; col9 '.' So that's a blank system? But maybe there are only 3 systems: red, green, blue, and X? Let's continue. Block4 (cols10-12): Row2: B . . Row3: B B . Row4: B . . That's blue system. Block5 (cols13-15): Row2: . X . Row3: X . X Row4: X . X That's grey X system. Thus there are 5 systems across the day: colors R,G,?,B,X. The middle blank maybe is a placeholder for something else? In description, each system has a unique cloud formation in its signature color, but formations drift between systems from day to day. So each system's color is fixed (si ... [11127 chars truncated]
"Façade panels on a building rotate their ornamental motifs one bay to the left with each floor. Design the floor above the roofline."
120b: fail
See: Colored panels in a fixed sequence of bays repeat on each floor, separated by horizontal cornices. Each bay displays a unique decorative pattern in its color, but the patterns shift positions from floor to floor.
Do: Study how motifs migrate across floors. After the top floor, project one more shift: each bay receives the motif from the bay to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost. Render only that new floor.
Grid: Each bay is a 3×3 region of colored (ornamented) and black (plain) cells. Floors are 3-row bands divided by cornice (black) rows. Output is a single 3-row floor.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid includes multiple floors separated by a row of all '.' (black) rows? In examples, there is a row of '.' separating floors. Each floor is 3 rows tall (since each bay is 3x3). The pattern: Input includes several floors (maybe 3 floors) and output is a single floor (the next floor after top floor, shifted right). Let's analyze. Example1 Input dimensions: appears 5 rows? Actually given as 5 rows? Let's count: Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's 5 rows, 15 columns. The pattern: first row all '.' (cornice top?), then three rows of data (floor 1?), then a row of '.' (bottom cornice). Output is 3 rows (floor after top floor?). Actually output rows: 3 rows, 15 columns. So input includes top cornice row, then floor (3 rows), then bottom cornice row. Output is the floor after shifting motifs right by one bay. The floor is same size as the floor region (3 rows). So we need to extract the 3 rows of data (the floor) and apply transformation: shift each 3x3 bay's motif to the right (wrapping). The bays are arranged horizontally across columns, each bay is 3 columns wide? Since each bay is 3x3 region. So each bay occupies 3 columns and 3 rows. In example1, there are 5 bays? Let's compute: total columns 15, each bay 3 columns => 5 bays. Indeed. Now each bay contains a pattern of colored cells (non-'.') within its 3x3 region. The pattern shifts positions from floor to floor (i.e., each floor's bays have different motifs). The rule: after the top floor, project one more shift: each bay receives the motif from the bay to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to leftmost. So we need to take the top floor (the only floor present) and produce a new floor where each bay's 3x3 pattern is replaced by the pattern of the bay to its right in the original floor. So essentially rotate the bays horizontally by -1 (left shift) or right shift? Let's read: "each bay receives the motif from the bay to its right, with the rightmost wrapping to the leftmost." That means new bay at position i gets motif from original bay i+1 (right neighbor). So motifs move leftwards (since they receive from right). Equivalent to shifting the whole floor left by one bay (wrapping). Let's test with example1. We need to compute original floor (rows 2-4). Let's write them as 3 rows of 15 columns. Row1 (R1): "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" Row2 (R2): ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" Row3 (R3): ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" Now split into 5 bays of 3 columns each. Bay0 columns 0-2: R1: R R R R2: . . R R3: . . R Pattern: looks like a vertical line of R at col2? Actually R's at (0,0-2) all R top row, bottom rows have R at col2. That's motif A. Bay1 columns 3-5: R1: . G . R2: . G . R3: . G G Pattern: G's vertical line plus extra G at bottom middle? Actually columns 4? Let's list: col3 '.' col4 'G' col5 '.' for ro ... [10540 chars truncated]
"Regiments in a battle line inherit the formation of the unit to their right at each changing of the guard. Issue the next set of orders."
120b: fail
See: Colored regiments hold positions in a fixed sequence across multiple watches, separated by ceasefire lines. Each regiment has a unique battle formation in its heraldic color, but formations pass along the line between watches.
Do: Decode the formation-passing pattern. After the final watch, issue one more order: each regiment assumes the formation of the regiment to its right, with the flank wrapping to the opposite end. Deploy only that formation.
Grid: Each regiment is a 3×3 block of colored (troops) and black (empty ground). Watches are 3-row bands separated by ceasefire (black) rows. Output is one 3-row deployment.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid consists of multiple 3-row bands separated by a row of all '.' (black). Each band contains 3x3 blocks (regiments) placed horizontally? Let's examine example1. Input dimensions? Example1 input lines: appears 5 rows? Actually given as 5 rows of 15 columns? Let's count: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 15 columns. second line "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" 15 columns. third line ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" 15. fourth line ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" 15. fifth line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 15. So 5 rows: top row all '.' (separator?), then three rows of data, then bottom row all '.'. Thus there is one watch (band) of 3 rows (rows 2-4) between black rows (row1 and row5). Output is 3 rows (same size 15). Output rows: first row "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X". second "R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X". third "R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X". So output seems to be transformation of the 3x3 blocks within the band. Let's identify blocks: In input, there are colored regiments each 3x3 block of a specific color pattern? Let's locate red regiment: appears as a 3x3 block of R's? Input rows 2-4 columns 1-3: rows2: R R R, row3: . . R, row4: . . R. That's not full 3x3 of R; shape like an L? Actually pattern maybe a specific formation shape for each color. Similarly green block columns 5-7? Input rows2-4 columns5-7: row2 col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; row3 col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; row4 col5 G, col6 G, col7 G. That's also L shape rotated. Blue block columns9-11: row2 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . ; row3 col9 ., col10 B, col11 B ; row4 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . . That's another shape. Grey X block columns13-15: row2 col13 X, col14 ., col15 X ; row3 col13 X, col14 X, col15 X ; row4 col13 X, col14 ., col15 X. That's a plus shape? Actually pattern similar to red but with X. So each regiment is a 3x3 pattern of its color placed in a 3x3 block region, with other cells '.' (black). The pattern seems to be a specific shape: maybe a "T" shape? Let's map red pattern: coordinates (row offset 0-2, col offset 0-2). Red pattern cells: (0,0)(0,1)(0,2) top row all red; (1,2) red; (2,2) red. That's like an L rotated? Actually shape: top row full, rightmost column full (including top row). So it's like a "Γ" shape (top row + right column). Green pattern: top cell at (0,0) (col5) only? Wait green block top row: row2 col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; row3 col5 G, col6 ., col7 . ; row4 col5 G, col6 G, col7 G. So shape: left column full, bottom row full. That's like rotated L (mirror). Blue pattern: row2 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . ; row3 col9 ., col10 B, col11 B ; row4 col9 B, col10 ., col11 . . That's shape: top-left cell, middle row right two cells, bottom-left cell. That's like a "Z" shape? Actually pattern: positions (0,0), (1,1),(1,2),(2,0). That's like a "S" shape? Grey X pattern: row2 col13 X, col14 ., col15 X ; row3 col13 X, col14 X, col15 X ; row4 col13 X, col14 ., col15 X. That's shape: corners plus middle row full? ... [10201 chars truncated]
"Actors in a repertory troupe swap costumes one position down the cast list between acts. The curtain call reveals the final costume change."
120b: fail
See: Colored performers sit in a fixed cast order across multiple acts, separated by intermissions. Each performer wears a unique costume silhouette in their spotlight color, but the silhouettes circulate through the cast between acts.
Do: Track the costume circulation. After the last act, apply one more swap: each performer dons the silhouette from the performer to their right, with the last wrapping to the first. Stage only the curtain call.
Grid: Each performer is a 3×3 block of colored (costumed) and black (bare stage) cells. Acts are 3-row bands separated by intermission (black) rows. Output is one 3-row scene.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3x3 blocks (performers) arranged in rows, separated by a blank row (all .) between acts? Let's examine example. Example 1 Input grid dimensions: appears 5 rows? Actually given lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X" ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X" ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X" ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." That's 5 rows, 15 columns. So there are 3 rows of performers (act) then a blank row at top and bottom? Actually first row all . maybe top margin. Then rows 2-4 contain data. Row5 all . bottom margin. So the performers are 3x3 blocks within rows 2-4, columns groups? Let's segment columns into groups of 3? 15 columns => 5 blocks per row. Indeed each performer is 3x3 block. Let's extract first block columns 1-3 rows 2-4: Rows2-4, cols1-3: R R R . . R . . R That's a 3x3 block representing performer A? Contains red and black. Second block columns4-6: col4-6 rows2-4: . G . . G . . G G? Wait need actual values: Let's list rows: Row2: columns4-6 = ". G ." Row3: ". G ." Row4: ". G G"? Actually row4 columns4-6: ". G G"? Row4 is ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X". Let's index: columns: 1 R,2 R,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X. Wait row4 col6 is '.' not G. Let's re-evaluate: Row4 string: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X". So columns:1 .,2 .,3 R,4 .,5 G,6 G,7 G,8 .,9 B,10 .,11 .,12 .,13 X,14 .,15 X. So block columns4-6 rows2-4: Row2 col4-6: ". G ." Row3 col4-6: ". G ." Row4 col4-6: ". G G" Thus block is: . G . . G . . G G Third block columns7-9: Row2 col7-9: ". . B" Row3 col7-9: ". . B" Row4 col7-9: " . B ."? Actually row4 col7=G, col8=., col9=B. So block: . . B . . B G . B Fourth block columns10-12: Row2 col10-12: ". . ." Row3 col10-12: "B B ."? Wait row3: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X". So columns10-12: B B . (col10 B, col11 B, col12 .) Row4 col10-12: ". . ." Thus block: . . . B B . . . . Fifth block columns13-15: Row2 col13-15: "X . X" Row3 col13-15: "X . X" Row4 col13-15: "X . X" So block: X . X X . X X . X Now output grid is 3 rows, 15 columns (no blank rows). Output rows: "R . . . G . . . B . B . X X X" "R . . . . G G . B . B . . . X" "R R R . G . . . B . B . . . X" Let's segment into 5 blocks again. Block1 columns1-3 rows output: Rows1-3: R . . R . . R R R That's same as original block1 but rotated? Actually original block1 was: R R R . . R . . R Now output block1 is: R . . R . . R R R So seems the silhouettes (pattern of colors) have been shifted right? The rule: each performer gets silhouette from performer to right, with wrap. So block1 gets silhouette of block2? Let's see block2 original pattern: . G . / . G . / . G G. Output block1 is R . . etc not matching. Wait maybe silhouette is shape of colored cells ignoring colors? Actually each performer has a unique costume silhouette (pattern of colored cells) but colors may differ? The description: each performer wears a unique costume silhouette in their spotlig ... [10889 chars truncated]
"Garden beds in a row trade their bloom patterns with the bed to their left each season. Predict what blooms next spring."
120b: fail
See: Colored flower beds line up in a fixed sequence across multiple seasons, separated by fallow strips. Each bed has a unique bloom arrangement in its petal color, but the arrangements migrate between beds from season to season.
Do: Follow the bloom migration. After the last observed season, advance one more: each bed inherits the bloom pattern from the bed to its right, wrapping the last to the first. Show only the spring planting.
Grid: Each bed is a 3×3 block of colored (blooming) and black (soil) cells. Seasons are 3-row bands separated by fallow (black) rows. Output is one 3-row season.
We need to understand puzzle. Input grid consists of multiple 3x3 blocks (beds) arranged horizontally? Actually description: colored flower beds line up in a fixed sequence across multiple seasons, separated by fallow strips. Each bed is a 3x3 block. Seasons are 3-row bands separated by fallow (black) rows. Output is one 3-row season (spring planting). So we have multiple seasons stacked vertically, each season is 3 rows of blocks, separated by a row of all black (.)? In examples, there is a row of all '.' between seasons. Let's examine Example 1. Input grid (I'll rewrite with coordinates). Provided as 5 rows? Actually they show 5 rows: first row all '.' (15 columns). second row: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". third row: ". . R . G . . . . B B . X . X". fourth row: ". . R . G G G . B . . . X . X". fifth row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". So 5 rows, 15 columns. Interpretation: There are 3 rows of data (rows 2-4) representing a season (spring?). Row1 and row5 are black separator rows (fallow). So there is only one season? But description says multiple seasons across multiple rows. However example only has one season? Output is 3 rows (same as season). Output grid: 3 rows, 15 columns. So transformation: "After the last observed season, advance one more: each bed inherits the bloom pattern from the bed to its right, wrapping the last to the first. Show only the spring planting." Thus we need to shift the 3x3 blocks horizontally to the left? Actually each bed inherits pattern from the bed to its right, meaning each bed's new pattern = pattern of its right neighbor in previous season. So we shift patterns leftwards (since each bed takes from right). Wrap last to first. Thus we need to identify the 3x3 blocks within the season. In example, there are maybe 5 beds? Let's parse. Columns 1-15. Let's segment into 3x3 blocks separated by a column of black? The description: "separated by fallow strips". In grid, there are '.' columns maybe representing separators. Let's look at row2: "R R R . G . . . B . . . X . X". So pattern: three Rs, then a dot, then G, then dot dot dot, then B, then dot dot dot, then X, dot, X. That's not uniform width. Maybe each bed is 3 columns wide, and there is a column of '.' between beds. Let's test: columns 1-3: R R R (bed1). column4: . separator. columns5-7: G . .? Wait column5 is G, column6 is ., column7 is . . That's not 3 columns of pattern. Hmm. Maybe each bed is 3x3 block but not necessarily contiguous; they are arranged in a 3x3 grid of cells (like each bed is 3x3 cells). The whole season is a 3x3 arrangement of beds? Actually each bed is 3x3 block, and there are multiple beds lined up in a fixed sequence across the row (horizontally). So each bed occupies 3 columns, and there is a column of '.' between beds (fallow strip). So pattern: bed1 columns 1-3, separator column4, bed2 columns5-7, separator column8, bed3 columns9-11, separator column12, bed4 columns13-15? Let's test with row2: columns1-3 = R R R (makes ... [9962 chars truncated]
See: The input grid has a black (.) background with grey (X) cells that form one or more snake-like connected components. Each component is a path one cell wide, meaning X cells connect to each other orthogonally (up, down, left, right) to form continuous, non-branching shapes. The components are spatially separated from one another — no X cell in one component is orthogonally adjacent to an X cell in another.
Do: 1. Identify all grey (X) cells in the input grid. 2. Determine the number of distinct connected components formed by these X cells, where two X cells are connected if they are orthogonally adjacent (share an edge horizontally or vertically). 3. Count the total number of connected components and add 1 to that count. 4. Produce an output grid that has exactly that many rows (count + 1), each row containing a single black (.) cell.
Grid: The output grid is always a single column (width 1). Its height equals the number of connected components of grey cells in the input plus one. Every cell in the output is black (.).
"A night sky remembers each river it has swallowed, plus the darkness that was there before."
120b: k=1
See: Against a vast dark sky, grey rivers wind across the landscape — each one a single, unbroken current that never forks or touches another. They twist and turn like serpents asleep on the void, each keeping a respectful distance from its neighbors.
Do: The sky is an ancient scribe who tallies every river it has absorbed. For each grey river swallowed into the darkness, the scribe places one drop of ink on a scroll. But the scribe always begins with one drop already on the page — a mark for the original emptiness that existed before any river flowed. Roll up the scroll when the counting is done.
Grid: The scroll is a single column of pure night. Its length is the scribe's tally — one drop for the void, one for each river the sky consumed.
We need to infer rule. Input grid contains '.' black and 'X' grey, maybe other colors not present. Output is a single column of '.'? In example 1, input is 7x7 grid with '.' and X. Output is three rows each '.'? Actually output shown: . . . So three rows, each a single '.' (black). That matches description: count of grey rivers (continuous lines) plus one for void. Need to count number of grey rivers (connected components) that are single unbroken lines that never fork or touch another. In example, we need to count number of such rivers. Output length = count + 1? Wait description: scribe always begins with one drop already on the page — a mark for the original emptiness that existed before any river flowed. So total drops = 1 + number of rivers. Output is a column of that many '.'? In example output length is 3, so there were 2 rivers in input. Let's verify: Input 7x7 grid. Let's map X positions. Row0: . X . . . . . (col1) Row1: . X X . . . . (col1,2) Row2: . . X . . X X (col2,5,6) Row3: . X X . . X . (col1,2,5) Row4: . X . . X X . (col1,4,5) Row5: . X . . X . . (col1,4) Row6: . X . . X . . (col1,4) We need to identify "grey rivers": each is a single, unbroken current that never forks or touches another. Likely each river is a connected component of X cells that forms a path (maybe orthogonal adjacency). Let's find components. Component A: column1 (col1) many X's rows0-6, plus some adjacent X at row1 col2, row2 col2, row3 col2? Actually row1 col2 is X adjacent to col1 row1 (horizontal). Row2 col2 X adjacent to row1 col2 (vertical). Row3 col2 X adjacent to row2 col2. So that forms a shape maybe branching? At row3 col2 also adjacent to row3 col1 (X). So component includes many cells: basically a thick shape maybe branching? But rule says rivers never fork or touch another. This component may have a branch? Let's see connectivity: Starting at (0,1) downwards column1. At row1, there is also (1,2) to the right, then (2,2) down, then (3,2) down, also (3,1) left. So shape like a T? At (3,2) also maybe (3,5) far away not connected. So component includes a branch at (1,2) and (2,2) and (3,2) making a line that goes right then down then left? That's still a single path without forks? Actually there is a branch at (1,2) which is a dead end? The path could be: start at top (0,1) down to (3,1) then right to (3,2) then up to (2,2) then up to (1,2) then maybe stop. That's a snake shape, no branching (each cell degree <=2). Let's check degrees: (0,1) degree1 (down). (1,1) degree2 (up/down). (2,1) degree2. (3,1) degree2 (up/right). (3,2) degree3? Adjacent to (3,1) left, (2,2) up, (4,2?) not X, (3,3?) none. So degree2 actually (left and up). Wait also (1,2) adjacent to (2,2) down, (1,1) left? Actually (1,2) adjacent left to (1,1) which is X? row1 col1 is X yes. So (1,2) degree2 (left and down). (2,2) degree2 (up/down). So all degrees <=2, so it's a simple path (maybe with bends). So that's one river. Component B: there are X's at columns5-6 etc. ... [4965 chars truncated]
"A petri dish holds grey colonies separated by sterile void. The lab notebook records one tally mark for each colony, then adds a final mark for the agar medium itself — nothing but empty wells in a single column."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey cells form distinct bacterial colonies on a dark nutrient field. Each colony is a connected chain of cells, isolated from its neighbors.
Do: Count the separate living colonies, then add one for the medium that sustains them all. Produce a single-column output with that many empty wells.
Grid: Output is one column wide. Height equals the number of grey connected groups plus one. Every cell is black.
"Grey nebulae stretch in wispy filaments across the void, each nebula a connected strand of dust isolated from its sisters. The observatory logs one dark pixel for each nebula detected, plus one for the void that holds them — a single narrow readout."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey filaments form separate connected nebulae against a black cosmos. Each nebula's dust connects only to itself.
Do: Count the distinct nebulae, add one, and output a single-column readout with that many dark pixels.
Grid: Output is one cell wide, all black, with height equal to grey connected components plus one.
"Grey currents weave through a dark sea, each current a connected ribbon of water that never merges with another. The navigator marks one dark fathom line for each current charted, and one more for the still deep beneath — a single sounding column."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected grey ribbons flow through a dark ocean, each ribbon a separate isolated current.
Do: Count the separate currents, add one, and record that many dark soundings in a single vertical column.
Grid: Single column output, all black, height equals number of grey connected currents plus one.
"Grey traces snake across a dark circuit board, each trace a connected wire that carries its own signal, isolated from every other. The oscilloscope displays one flat dark pulse for each trace, plus one for the ground — a single vertical channel of silence."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected grey traces form separate wiring paths on a dark board. No trace touches another.
Do: Count the isolated traces, add one, and display that many dark pulses in a single vertical channel.
Grid: Output: one column, all black cells, height is number of grey connected traces plus one.
"Grey serpents coil through the underworld's darkness, each serpent a single unbroken body that never entwines with another. The oracle places one obsidian stone for each serpent glimpsed, and one more for the darkness that birthed them — a single column of black stones."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey serpentine shapes wind through a dark void, each a connected body isolated from the rest.
Do: Count the serpents, add one, and stack that many black stones in a single column.
Grid: One column of black cells, height equals grey serpent count plus one.
"Grey ribbons trace separate winding choreographies across a dark floor, each ribbon the path of one dancer who never crosses another's trail. The choreographer notes one beat of silence for each dancer, plus one for the stillness before the music — a single vertical score of dark beats."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected grey ribbons mark distinct dance paths on a dark floor. Each dancer's ribbon is isolated from every other.
Do: Count the dancers' paths, add one, and write that many silent beats in a single vertical column.
Grid: Output is a single column, all black, height equals number of grey ribbon paths plus one.
"Grey veins of ore twist through dark bedrock, each vein a connected seam that never joins another. The surveyor drills one dark core sample for each vein discovered, plus one for the barren rock itself — a single narrow column of dark cores."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected grey mineral veins wind through dark stone. Each vein is an isolated connected seam.
Do: Count the distinct ore veins, add one, and produce a single column of dark core samples equal to that total.
Grid: Single column, all black cells, height equals number of grey connected veins plus one.
"A dark cutting board bears grey noodles in tangled portions. The chef plates one empty black bowl for each portion, then sets out an extra bowl for the broth that has no noodle at all."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey strands sit on a black surface, forming separate tangled portions that never touch each other.
Do: Count the separate noodle portions, add one, and line up that many empty bowls in a single stack.
Grid: Output is a single column of black cells. Its height is one more than the number of distinct grey groups.
"Grey notes wind through a silent score in separate melodic phrases. The conductor marks one rest for every phrase heard, then adds a rest for the silence that frames them all — a column of nothing but pauses."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey marks form winding phrases across a dark, silent background. Each phrase is a connected run of marks, separated from others by empty space.
Do: Count the distinct phrases, add one, and write that many rests in a single vertical staff.
Grid: A single column of black cells, one row per phrase plus one additional row.
"Grey relay teams snake across a darkened track, each team passing batons among its own runners but never to another team. The scorekeeper posts one blank lane marker for each team, plus one for the empty track itself."
120b: k=1
See: Connected chains of grey cells form separate relay teams on a black field. No team's members touch another team's.
Do: Count the relay teams, add one, and post that many blank markers in a single vertical column.
Grid: Output is one cell wide. Row count equals teams plus one. All cells are black.
We need to infer rule. Input grid with colors: . black, X grey, others maybe not present. The description: "Connected chains of grey cells form separate relay teams on a black field. No team's members touch another team's. What to do: Count the relay teams, add one, and post that many blank markers in a single vertical column. Grid details: Output is one cell wide. Row count equals teams plus one. All cells are black." So we count connected components of X (grey) using orthogonal adjacency? Likely 4-direction connectivity. Count number of separate components. Then output a column of '.' (black) with rows = count + 1. So output is a single column of '.' repeated count+1 times. Check Example 1: Input grid 7x7. Need to count components of X. Let's map quickly. Rows: 0: . X . . . . . 1: . X X . . . . 2: . . X . . X X 3: . X X . . X . 4: . X . . X X . 5: . X . . X . . 6: . X . . X . . Let's label coordinates (r,c). Determine components. Component A: Starting at (0,1). Connected downwards: (1,1) adjacent, (1,2) adjacent to (1,1)? (1,2) is X adjacent horizontally to (1,1). (2,2) X adjacent to (1,2). (3,1) X adjacent to (2,1?) but (2,1) is .; however (3,1) adjacent to (2,1) no. But (3,1) adjacent to (2,1) not X. However (3,1) adjacent to (2,1) . but also adjacent to (3,2) X? (3,2) is X. (3,2) adjacent to (2,2) X, so part of same component. Continue: (4,1) X adjacent to (3,1). (5,1) X adjacent to (4,1). (6,1) X adjacent to (5,1). Also (4,4) X? That's separate maybe. Also there are X at column 4/5 etc. Let's list all X coordinates: (0,1) (1,1),(1,2) (2,2),(2,5),(2,6) (3,1),(3,2),(3,5) (4,1),(4,4),(4,5) (5,1),(5,4) (6,1),(6,4) Now find components. Component 1: Starting (0,1) includes all X in left cluster: (0,1),(1,1),(1,2),(2,2),(3,1),(3,2),(4,1),(5,1),(6,1). Also (4,? maybe (4,2) is .) So that's one component. Check connectivity to (2,5) etc: Not connected because gap. Component 2: X at (2,5) adjacent to (2,6) horizontally, also (3,5) below, (4,5) below, (4,4) left of (4,5), (5,4) below (4,4)?? Actually (5,4) is X, adjacent to (4,4). (6,4) X adjacent to (5,4). So these form another component: (2,5),(2,6),(3,5),(4,5),(4,4),(5,4),(6,4). Also (5,? maybe (5,5) .). So component 2. Thus total components = 2. Then output rows = teams + 1 = 3. Output column of '.' of length 3. Example output shows three rows each with '.' (single column). Indeed output: . . . Matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now test input grid 9x10? Let's parse. Rows given: Row0: ". . X . . . X . . ." Row1: ". . X . . . X X . ." Row2: ". . X X . . . X . ." Row3: ". . . X . . . X X ." Row4: ". X X X . . . . X ." Row5: ". X . . . . X X X ." Row6: ". X . . . . X . . ." Row7: ". X X . . X X . . ." Row8: ". . X . . X . . . ." Let's index columns 0-9. List X coordinates: Row0: col2, col6 Row1: col2, col6, col7 Row2: col2, col3, col7 Row3: col3, col7, col8 Row4: col1, col2, col3, col8 Row5: col1, col6, col7, col8 Row6: col1, col6 Row7: col1, col2, col5, col6 Row8: col2, col5 Now n ... [3954 chars truncated]
"Grey storm fronts drift across a black sky, each front a connected ribbon of cloud. The barometer drops once for each front and once more for the calm eye that watches over all — recording only darkness in a narrow glass tube."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Ribbons of grey cloud snake across a dark sky, each an unbroken connected mass separated from the others by clear air.
Do: Count the separate storm fronts, add one, then produce a single narrow column of dark readings equal to that total.
Grid: Single-column output, all black cells, height equals number of grey connected regions plus one.
"Grey walls wind through a dark blueprint, forming separate labyrinths that never share a corridor. The architect stamps one blank foundation tile for each labyrinth, plus one for the ground beneath them all."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected grey walls form distinct winding structures on a dark plan. Each structure's walls connect to its own but never to another's.
Do: Count the distinct walled structures, add one, and stack that many blank tiles in a single column.
Grid: Output is a single column of black tiles. Height is the number of grey structures plus one.
"Grey supply lines thread across a dark battlefield, each line a connected chain of outposts belonging to one regiment. The general drops one black marker into the sand table for each regiment, and one more for the contested ground between them."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Grey outposts form separate connected supply lines across a dark field. Each regiment's line is isolated from every other.
Do: Count the regiments, add one, and place that many dark markers in a single vertical column.
Grid: A single column of black cells, height equal to the number of distinct grey connected chains plus one.
"Grey spotlights trace separate winding paths across a dark stage, each path illuminating one actor's journey. The stagehand hangs one dark curtain panel for each journey performed, plus one for the darkness waiting in the wings."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Connected trails of grey light form distinct paths on a dark stage. Each path is a continuous thread, separated from every other path.
Do: Count the separate lit paths, add one, and hang that many dark panels in a single vertical row.
Grid: Output: single column, all black cells, height equals number of grey paths plus one.
"Grey vines creep through dark soil, each vine a single connected tendril that never grafts onto another. The gardener places one empty seed pot for each vine, then one more for the bare earth — a single column of dark pots."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Winding grey vines grow through dark soil. Each vine is a connected chain of cells, separate from every other vine.
Do: Count the individual vines, add one, and stack that many empty dark pots in a column.
Grid: One column of black cells, height equals the count of grey vine components plus one.
See: The input is a rectangular grid divided into four quadrants by a yellow cross — a horizontal row of all yellow cells and a vertical column of all yellow cells that intersect at one point. This cross splits the grid into four equally-sized rectangular regions. Each quadrant contains a pattern made from one signature color on a black background: the top-left quadrant uses orange (O), the top-right uses white (W), the bottom-left uses red (R), and the bottom-right uses azure (A). Each quadrant has the same dimensions.
Do: 1. Identify the yellow cross (one full yellow row and one full yellow column) and extract the four quadrants, ignoring the yellow dividers. All four quadrants share the same dimensions — this will be the output size. 2. For each cell position in the output grid, examine the corresponding cell in all four quadrants. Each quadrant cell is either its signature color or black. 3. Determine which quadrants have a non-black (colored) value at that position. If none do, the output cell is black. 4. If one or more quadrants are non-black at that position, select the winner using the fixed priority order: azure (A) > orange (O) > white (W) > red (R). The highest-priority non-black color wins and is placed in the output cell.
Grid: The input grid is 11 rows by 9 columns, with a yellow row (row 5) and a yellow column (column 4) forming a cross that divides the grid into four 5×4 quadrants. The output grid matches the quadrant dimensions: 5 rows by 4 columns. The background color is black (.). The four signature colors — orange, white, red, azure — each appear exclusively in their respective quadrant in the input but may all appear in the output.
"Four royal houses compete for territory, and the crown goes to whoever has the strongest claim."
120b: k=3
See: A golden cross — like two roads meeting at a crossroads — carves the land into four kingdoms. Each kingdom flies a single banner over its domain: orange in the northwest, white in the northeast, red in the southwest, and azure in the southeast. Within each kingdom, some plots are settled (colored) and some lie fallow (black).
Do: The golden borders dissolve, and all four kingdoms collapse onto the same contested map. Where no kingdom has planted a flag, the land remains barren. Where multiple houses claim the same plot, the dispute is settled by ancient right of succession: the Azure throne outranks all, Orange bows only to Azure, White yields to both Orange and Azure, and Red — the least of the four — wins only when no other house stands on the ground.
Grid: The golden crossroads splits the realm into four provinces of equal size. When the borders fall, the contested map matches the size of a single province. Every plot on this final map bears the color of whichever surviving house holds the strongest claim there.
We need to understand puzzle. The description: golden cross splits grid into four quadrants (kingdoms). Input grid includes a central row/column of Y (yellow) representing the golden cross? In examples, there is a row of Y across middle and column of Y across middle. Indeed each input shows a 11x9? Let's examine Example1 input dimensions: lines? Let's count rows: appears 11 rows? Actually list: Row1 ". O . . Y W . W ." Row2 "O O . . Y W . . ." Row3 ". . . . Y W . W W" Row4 ". O O O Y . . . ." Row5 ". . O O Y . . W W" Row6 "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" Row7 ". R R . Y A A . ." Row8 "R R . R Y A . A A" Row9 "R . R R Y . A . A" Row10 "R . R R Y . A A ." Row11 "R . . . Y . . A ." So 11 rows, 9 columns. The central row (row6) all Y. Also central column (col5) all Y. So cross splits into four quadrants each of size 5 rows x 4 columns? Actually above cross, there are 5 rows (rows1-5) and below cross 5 rows (rows7-11). Left side columns1-4, right side columns6-9. So each quadrant 5x4. Goal: "golden borders dissolve, and all four kingdoms collapse onto the same contested map. The contested map matches the size of a single province." So output grid size is 5 rows x 4 columns (size of one quadrant). Indeed example outputs have 5 rows and 4 columns. Now rule: For each cell position within a quadrant (relative coordinates), we look at the four quadrants' cells at that position (same offset from cross). Each quadrant has its own color (orange, white, red, azure) as "banner" meaning the dominant house for that quadrant? Actually description: each kingdom flies a single banner over its domain: orange in the northwest, white in the northeast, red in the southwest, azure in the southeast. Within each kingdom, some plots are settled (colored) and some lie fallow (black). So the colors present in each quadrant are the "settled" cells (non-black). The banner color maybe not directly present; but the rule for conflict: Azure outranks all, Orange bows only to Azure, White yields to both Orange and Azure, Red wins only when no other house stands. Thus for each position, we consider the colors present in each quadrant at that relative position. If multiple non-black colors, we select according to hierarchy: Azure > Orange > White > Red. If none (all black), output black (.)? The description says "Where no kingdom has planted a flag, the land remains barren." So black. Thus we need to map colors: Azure = A, Orange = O, White = W, Red = R. Also there may be other colors? In examples only these four appear plus Y (cross) and . (black). So rule: For each cell (i,j) in output (size 5x4), look at four quadrants: NW quadrant: rows 1-5, cols1-4 (relative positions (r,c)) NE: rows1-5, cols6-9 SW: rows7-11, cols1-4 SE: rows7-11, cols6-9 Take the character at each quadrant cell. If it's '.' (black) treat as empty. Among non-'.' choose highest rank: A > O > W > R. Output that character. If multiple same highest? they are same char anyway. Let's test with Example1 to ... [4983 chars truncated]
"Four strains of bacteria colonize a petri dish divided by nutrient barriers. When the barriers dissolve, they compete for each microsite — but some strains have natural antibiotic resistance that lets them dominate weaker neighbors."
120b: k=2
See: A culture plate quartered by bright nutrient channels, each quadrant teeming with a different colored colony against dark agar.
Do: Remove the nutrient barriers and let the colonies overlap. Where multiple strains claim the same site, the one with the strongest resistance outcompetes the rest. Empty sites remain barren.
Grid: The nutrient channels form a bright cross. Each quarter-plate is the same size. The output is one quarter-plate showing the surviving colony colors after competition.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grid appears larger (maybe 11x9?) Let's examine example1 input dimensions: lines? Provided as rows with spaces? Let's count: first line ". O . . Y W . W ." that's 9 columns. There are 11 rows (since after that many). So grid 11x9. Output is 5x4? Actually output lines: "A A W ." (4 cols) then 5 rows? Let's count rows: output has 5 rows, each 4 columns. So output is quarter size: input divided by 2? Input 11 rows, 9 cols. Quarter would be about 5x4 (floor). Indeed output 5 rows, 4 cols. So rule: take quadrants separated by central cross (row of Y's and column of Y's?). In input, there is a full row of Y across middle (row 6) and a full column of Y across middle (col 5). Indeed row 6 is all Y. Column 5 is all Y. That forms a bright cross dividing into four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The description: remove nutrient barriers (the cross) and let colonies overlap; where multiple strains claim same site, the one with strongest resistance outcompetes. Need to define strength ordering among colors. Probably based on some hierarchy: maybe alphabetical? Let's infer from example1. We need to overlay quadrants onto one quarter (maybe top-left?) after removing cross, i.e., superimpose the four quadrants onto each other aligning at the cross intersection? The output is one quarter showing surviving colors after competition. Which quarter? Probably top-left quadrant (northwest). Let's test. Take example1 input quadrants: size? Since there are 11 rows, middle row index 6 (1-index). So top part rows 1-5, bottom rows 7-11. Similarly columns 1-4 left, columns 6-9 right. So each quadrant is 5 rows x4 cols. Now we need to overlay them: maybe overlay all four quadrants onto same coordinate system (like top-left) by rotating? Or maybe they are just stacked: each quadrant contributes its colors to same positions, and competition resolves. But output is 5x4, same size as each quadrant. So we need to combine the four quadrants cell-wise: for each position (i,j) within quadrant, we have up to four colors from the four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The cross removed, so they all occupy same area. Then we pick the strongest color among those present (maybe based on some ranking). If a quadrant has '.' (black) meaning empty, then it's like no colony. Let's test with example1 to deduce ranking. First, extract quadrants. I'll label rows 1-11, cols1-9. Row1: . O . . Y W . W . Cols1-4: . O . . (TL) Cols6-9: W . W . (TR) (col5 is Y) Row2: O O . . Y W . . . TL: O O . . TR: W . . . Row3: . . . . Y W . W W TL: . . . . TR: W . W W Row4: . O O O Y . . . . TL: . O O O TR: . . . . Row5: . . O O Y . . W W TL: . . O O TR: . . W W Row6 is Y row (ignored) Row7: . R R . Y A A . . TL: . R R . TR: A A . . Row8: R R . R Y A . A A TL: R R . R TR: A . A A Row9: R . R R Y . A . A TL: R . R R TR: . A . A Row10: R . R R Y . A A . TL: R . R R TR: . A A . Row11: R . . . Y . . A . TL: R . . . ... [8504 chars truncated]
"Four nebulae glow in different quadrants of a sky map divided by a golden celestial meridian cross. When their light is composited, the most luminous nebula always outshines dimmer ones at each pixel of the image."
120b: k=2
See: A star chart quartered by golden coordinate lines, each quadrant showing a different-colored nebula against the void of space.
Do: Composite all four quadrants into a single deep-sky image. Where nebulae overlap, the most luminous one dominates the pixel. Empty sky stays dark.
Grid: Golden coordinate lines form a cross creating four equal chart quadrants. The composited image matches one quadrant in size.
We need to infer rule. The description: "star chart quartered by golden coordinate lines, each quadrant showing a different-colored nebula against the void of space. Composite all four quadrants into a single deep-sky image. Where nebulae overlap, the most luminous one dominates the pixel. Empty sky stays dark. Grid details: Golden coordinate lines form a cross creating four equal chart quadrants. The composited image matches one quadrant in size." Interpretation: Input grid contains a cross (maybe a row and column of a particular color) dividing into four quadrants. In examples, there is a central row of Y's (yellow) across entire width, and a central column of Y's? Let's examine Example 1 input. I'll rewrite grid with coordinates. Example1 input size? Let's count rows: lines given: 1 ". O . . Y W . W ." 2 "O O . . Y W . . ." 3 ". . . . Y W . W W" 4 ". O O O Y . . . ." 5 ". . O O Y . . W W" 6 "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 7 ". R R . Y A A . ." 8 "R R . R Y A . A A" 9 "R . R R Y . A . A" 10 "R . R R Y . A A ." 11 "R . . . Y . . A ." So 11 rows, 9 columns? Actually each row length: row1 has 9 entries. So grid 11x9. There is a central row of Y's at row6 (index 6). Also a central column of Y's at column5 (since each row has Y at position 5). Indeed column5 is all Y's. So cross of Y's dividing into four quadrants each of size 5 rows above/below? Since total rows 11, central row index 6 (1-indexed). So top quadrants rows 1-5, bottom rows 7-11. Columns left of column5 are columns1-4, right columns6-9. So each quadrant is 5x4. Goal: composite four quadrants into a single quadrant-sized image (size of one quadrant: 5 rows x 4 columns). Overlap rule: where nebulae overlap, the most luminous dominates. Need ordering of luminosity among colors. Probably based on some hierarchy: maybe A (azure) brightest, then O (orange), then W (maroon), then R (red), then G etc. Need deduce from example. We need to take each quadrant's pattern (excluding the cross) and overlay them onto each other to produce output of size 5x4 (same as quadrant). Which quadrant is output? Probably top-left quadrant? Let's see output example1: Output grid 5 rows x 4 columns (matches quadrant size). Output rows: 1 "A A W ." 2 "A O A A" 3 "W A W A" 4 "R A A O" 5 "R . A O" Now we need to see if this matches composition of quadrants. Let's extract quadrants from input. Define quadrants: Top-left (TL): rows1-5, cols1-4. Rows1-5, cols1-4: r1: . O . . r2: O O . . r3: . . . . r4: . O O O r5: . . O O TL matrix: [ [.,O,.,.], [O,O,.,.], [.,.,.,.], [.,O,O,O], [.,.,O,O] ] Top-right (TR): rows1-5, cols6-9 (since col5 is Y). Let's extract: Rows1-5, cols6-9: r1 col6 W,7 .,8 W,9 . r2: col6 W,7 .,8 .,9 . r3: col6 W,7 .,8 W,9 W r4: col6 .,7 .,8 .,9 . r5: col6 .,7 .,8 W,9 W TR matrix: [ [W,.,W,.], [W,.,.,.], [W,.,W,W], [.,.,.,.], [.,.,W,W] ] Bottom-left (BL): rows7-11, cols1-4. Rows7-11: r7 ". R R ." r8 "R R . R" r9 "R . R R" r10 "R . R R" r11 "R . . ." BL matrix: [ [.,R,R,.], [R,R,.,R], ... [8114 chars truncated]
"Four colored currents flow through quadrants of a sea chart divided by golden shipping lanes. Where currents converge, the strongest always pushes weaker ones aside and claims the water."
120b: fail
See: A nautical chart quartered by golden shipping lanes, each quadrant showing a different-colored current against calm dark water.
Do: Let the currents flow into one shared zone. Where multiple currents meet, the most powerful one dominates. Calm waters stay undisturbed.
Grid: Golden shipping lanes form a cross dividing the chart into four equal zones. The merged current map matches one zone in size.
We need to infer rule. Input grid includes a cross of Y (yellow) row and column? In examples, there is a central row of Y across entire width, and a central column of Y down entire height. That is the "golden shipping lanes". The quadrants are top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right each containing other colors. Goal: "Let the currents flow into one shared zone. Where multiple currents meet, the most powerful one dominates. Calm waters stay undisturbed." Means we need to merge the four quadrants into a single quadrant sized same as one quadrant (i.e., output size equals quadrant size). The Y lanes are like boundaries, they become maybe ignored? The output appears to be a 5x4? Let's examine example. Example 1 input dimensions: Let's count rows. Input lines: 1 ". O . . Y W . W ." 2 "O O . . Y W . . ." 3 ". . . . Y W . W W" 4 ". O O O Y . . . ." 5 ". . O O Y . . W W" 6 "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 7 ". R R . Y A A . ." 8 "R R . R Y A . A A" 9 "R . R R Y . A . A" 10 "R . R R Y . A A ." 11 "R . . . Y . . A ." So 11 rows, 9 columns. The Y cross: row 6 is all Y. Column 5 is all Y. So quadrants each 5 rows x4 columns? Top-left rows1-5 cols1-4 (5x4). Top-right rows1-5 cols6-9 (5x4). Bottom-left rows7-11 cols1-4 (5x5? Wait rows7-11 is 5 rows, cols1-4 is 4 columns). Bottom-right rows7-11 cols6-9 (5x4). So each quadrant 5x4. Output grid given: 5 rows? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" "R . . . Y . . A ."? Wait that's extra? Actually output lines after "Output:" there are many lines? Let's re-express. The problem statement after Example 1 shows Output: then lines: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O But then there are extra lines? Let's read: After output lines, there is maybe leftover? The given text: Output: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O Test Input: ... So output is 5 rows, 4 columns. Yes matches quadrant size. Thus rule: For each position within a quadrant (relative coordinates), we need to consider the four quadrants' colors at that position and combine according to dominance hierarchy. "most powerful dominates". Need to infer hierarchy from example. Let's map quadrants: Top-left (TL) 5x4: Rows1-5, Col1-4: Row1: . O . . Row2: O O . . Row3: . . . . Row4: . O O O Row5: . . O O Top-right (TR) rows1-5, cols6-9: Row1: W . W . Row2: W . . . Row3: W . W W Row4: . . . . Row5: . . W W Bottom-left (BL) rows7-11, cols1-4: Rows7: . R R . Row8: R R . R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . R R Row11: R . . . Bottom-right (BR) rows7-11, cols6-9: Rows7: A A . . Row8: A . A A Row9: . A . A A Row10: . A A A . Row11: . . A . . Now output 5x4 grid (rows correspond to TL rows order). Let's list output rows: 1: A A W . 2: A O A A 3: W A W A 4: R A A O 5: R . A O Now we need to see how each output cell derived from the four quadrants at same relative position. Let's create table of positions (r,c) 1-5,1-4. I'll list TL, TR, BL, BR values. Pos (1,1): TL='.' ; TR='W' (since row1 col6) ; BL='.' (row7 col1) ; BR='A' (row7 ... [6786 chars truncated]
"Four signal channels feed through quadrants of a circuit board separated by golden bus traces. When signals are multiplexed onto one output, a priority encoder always passes the highest-priority active signal at each bit position."
120b: fail
See: A circuit board quartered by golden bus traces, each quadrant carrying a different-colored signal pattern against inactive low states.
Do: Multiplex all four channels through a priority encoder. At each bit position, the highest-priority active signal passes through. Inactive positions output low.
Grid: Golden bus traces form a cross dividing the board into four equal channel blocks. The output matches one block in size.
We need to infer rule. From description: golden bus traces form a cross dividing board into four quadrants. In inputs, there is a row of Y across middle? Indeed all examples have a full row of Y across middle (row 6 of 11?). Input grids are 11x9? Let's check example1 input dimensions: lines count? Provided 11 rows each with 9 columns. Yes 11x9. The middle row (row 6) is all Y. That's the bus trace horizontal. Also there is a column of Y? Actually column? In examples, there is a column of Y? Let's see column 5 maybe? In example1, column 5 (0-index?) Let's count: row strings: ". O . . Y W . W ." => positions: 1 '.' 2 'O' 3 '.' 4 '.' 5 'Y' 6 'W' 7 '.' 8 'W' 9 '.' So column 5 is Y across all rows? Check row2: "O O . . Y W . . ." column5 Y yes. Row3: ". . . . Y W . W W" column5 Y yes. Row4: ". O O O Y . . . ." column5 Y yes. Row5: ". . O O Y . . W W" column5 Y yes. Row6: all Y. Row7: ". R R . Y A A . ." column5 Y yes. Row8: "R R . R Y A . A A" column5 Y yes. Row9: "R . R R Y . A . A" column5 Y yes. Row10: "R . R R Y . A A ." column5 Y yes. Row11: "R . . . Y . . A ." column5 Y yes. So column5 is all Y, forming vertical bus trace. So cross of Y dividing into four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. The output matches one block in size (maybe quadrant size). Output dimensions: 5 rows x 4 columns? Example1 output has 5 rows each 4 columns. Indeed quadrant size: Since original 11x9, cross splits into quadrants of size (rows above bus =5 rows, rows below =5 rows) and columns left of bus =4 columns, right =4 columns. So each quadrant is 5x4. Output is 5x4, matches one quadrant (maybe top-left? but need to see). Let's compare output to quadrants. Example1 output: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O Now look at top-left quadrant of input (rows1-5, cols1-4). Extract: Rows1-5, cols1-4: Row1: . O . . Row2: O O . . Row3: . . . . Row4: . O O O Row5: . . O O That's 5x4 grid. Top-right quadrant (rows1-5, cols6-9): Rows1: W . W . Row2: W . . . Row3: W . W W Row4: . . . . Row5: . W W W Bottom-left quadrant (rows7-11, cols1-4): Rows7: . R R . Row8: R R . R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . R R Row11: R . . . Bottom-right quadrant (rows7-11, cols6-9): Rows7: A A . . Row8: A . A A Row9: . A . A Row10: . A A . Row11: . . A . Now output seems to be some combination of these quadrants after applying priority encoder across channels? The description: "Multiplex all four channels through a priority encoder. At each bit position, the highest-priority active signal passes through. Inactive positions output low." So we have four quadrants each representing a channel with colors (signals). At each cell position (relative within quadrant), we look at the four corresponding cells from each quadrant (same relative coordinates). Choose the highest priority active signal (non-black '.' maybe). Priority order? Probably based on color hierarchy: maybe A > W > O > R > ... Not sure. Let's test. Take position (row1,col1) within quadrant (top-left). Va ... [7534 chars truncated]
"Four elemental gods each rule a quarter of a realm divided by golden divine boundaries. When the boundaries shatter, their powers flood inward — but a celestial hierarchy ensures the mightiest god's essence prevails wherever powers clash."
120b: fail
See: A realm map quartered by golden divine boundaries, each domain infused with a different god's colored essence against mortal darkness.
Do: Shatter the boundaries and let all essences merge. Where multiple gods' powers contest the same ground, the highest in the celestial hierarchy claims it. Mortal ground stays dark.
Grid: Golden boundaries form a cross dividing the realm into four equal domains. The unified realm matches one domain in size.
We need to infer rule. From description: golden boundaries form a cross dividing realm into four equal domains. The unified realm matches one domain in size. So input grid has a cross of Y (yellow) maybe? In examples, there is a row of Y across middle and column of Y across middle. Indeed each input has a full row of Y across middle (row 6) and a column of Y across middle (col 5). That's the golden boundaries (yellow). They divide into four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Each quadrant contains colored "essences": O (orange), W (maroon), R (red), A (azure) etc. The description: each domain infused with a different god's colored essence against mortal darkness (black .). So each quadrant has a dominant color? The transformation: "Shatter the boundaries and let all essences merge. Where multiple gods' powers contest the same ground, the highest in the celestial hierarchy claims it. Mortal ground stays dark." Thus we need to overlay the four quadrants onto a single quadrant size (the unified realm matches one domain in size). Likely we take one quadrant (maybe top-left) as the output size, and fill it with colors from all quadrants, with priority hierarchy among colors. From examples: Input size 11x9? Let's check example1 input dimensions: lines count 11 rows, each row length 9? Actually first line ". O . . Y W . W ." that's 9 entries. So 11 rows x9 columns. The cross: row 6 (index 5) all Y, column 5 (index 4) all Y. So quadrants each 5x4? Since left side columns 0-3, right side columns 5-8 (since column 4 is Y). So each quadrant size 5 rows (top rows 0-4) and 4 columns (left) etc. Output size appears 5 rows x4 columns (matching one quadrant). Example1 output: 5 rows each 4 entries. Yes. Thus rule: For each cell in a quadrant (relative position), we consider the four cells from the four quadrants that map onto that position (i.e., same offset from center). Then we choose the "highest" color according to hierarchy. Need to deduce hierarchy order from examples. Colors present: O (orange), W (maroon), R (red), A (azure), maybe others. Hierarchy maybe: A > O > W > R? Let's test. Example1: Let's compute top-left quadrant (rows0-4, cols0-3). Input top-left quadrant values: Rows0-4, cols0-3: Row0: . O . . Row1: O O . . Row2: . . . . Row3: . O O O Row4: . . O O Top-right quadrant (rows0-4, cols5-8): Row0: W . W . Row1: W . . . Row2: W . W W Row3: . . . . Row4: . W W Bottom-left quadrant (rows6-10, cols0-3): Rows6-10: Row6: . R R . Row7: R R . R Row8: R . R R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . . . Bottom-right quadrant (rows6-10, cols5-8): Rows6-10, cols5-8: Row6: A A . . Row7: A . A A Row8: . A . A Row9: . A A . Row10: . . A . Now output 5x4 grid (rows0-4, cols0-3) is: Row0: A A W . Row1: A O A A Row2: W A W A Row3: R A A O Row4: R . A O Let's see mapping: For each position (i,j) (0-4,0-3), we have four candidates: TL, TR, BL, BR. Need to see which chosen. Take position (0,0): TL '.' ; TR (row0 col5?) Actually TR offse ... [10753 chars truncated]
"Four dance troupes rehearse in quadrants of a ballroom separated by golden ribbon dividers. When the ribbons drop, all troupes perform on the same floor — but when dancers collide, the troupe with the higher billing always holds the position."
120b: k=2
See: A ballroom floor quartered by golden ribbon lines, each section occupied by dancers in a different color against empty floorspace.
Do: Drop the ribbons and let all troupes dance on one floor. Where dancers from multiple troupes claim the same mark, the higher-billed troupe keeps the position. Empty marks stay open.
Grid: Golden ribbons form a cross dividing the floor into four equal sections. The combined choreography fills one section's worth of space.
We need to infer rule. The description: golden ribbon lines forming a cross dividing floor into four equal sections. Input shows a cross of Y (yellow) across middle row and column? Let's examine examples. Example1 input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 11 rows? Actually list: lines: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, each 9 columns. The cross is column 5 (0-index?) all Y's, and row 6 (index 5) all Y's. Indeed row 6 is all Y. Column 5 (0-index 4) is Y in all rows. So golden ribbon = Y line. The four quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Each quadrant contains different colors: top-left has O and . and W etc. top-right similar. bottom-left has R and A etc. bottom-right has A etc. Goal: "Drop the ribbons and let all troupes dance on one floor. Where dancers from multiple troupes claim the same mark, the higher-billed troupe keeps the position. Empty marks stay open." Means we need to overlay the four quadrants onto one quadrant (maybe top-left?) after removing the cross. The higher-billed troupe: ranking of colors? Need to infer from output. Output for example1 is 5 rows by 4 columns? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" "R . . ."? Wait output lines given: ``` A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O ``` That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So output size is quadrant size: original 11x9, cross splits into 5 rows above cross, 5 rows below (since cross row removed). Similarly columns: 4 left of cross, 4 right. So quadrant size = (rows-1)/2 =5, (cols-1)/2=4. Output is 5x4. Now need to combine the four quadrants into one, perhaps by overlaying them with priority order (higher-billed troupe). Which troupe has higher priority? Colors: maybe order: A > O > W > R > ... Not sure. Let's extract quadrants from example1. Define top-left quadrant (rows 0-4, cols 0-3): Rows0-4, cols0-3: Row0: . O . . Row1: O O . . Row2: . . . . Row3: . O O O Row4: . . O O Top-right quadrant (rows0-4, cols5-8): Row0 cols5-8: W . W . Row1: W . . . Row2: W . W W Row3: . . . . Row4: . . W W Bottom-left quadrant (rows6-10, cols0-3): Rows6-10: Row6: . R R . Row7: R R . R Row8: R . R R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . . . Bottom-right quadrant (rows6-10, cols5-8): Row6: A A . . Row7: A . A A Row8: . A . A Row9: . A A . Row10: . . A . Now output 5x4 grid. Let's see which quadrant contributed each cell based on priority. Output rows correspond to rows0-4 (top half) maybe? Actually output rows 0-4 correspond to rows0-4? Let's map. Output row0: "A A W ." Row0 col0 = A. Where does A appear in quadrants? A only in bottom-right quadrant. So they are taking bottom-right quadrant and moving it to top-left? Let's see mapping: bottom-right quadrant rows0-4 correspond to original rows6-10. So output row0 corresponds to original row ... [8497 chars truncated]
"Four mineral deposits sit in quadrants of a cross-section separated by a golden volcanic intrusion. Under tectonic pressure, the layers compress together — but harder minerals always displace softer ones wherever veins intersect."
120b: k=3
See: A geological cross-section quartered by a golden igneous intrusion, each quadrant showing a different-colored mineral deposit against bare rock.
Do: Compress all four quadrants under tectonic force into a single layer. Where mineral veins overlap, the harder mineral displaces the softer one. Bare rock stays empty.
Grid: The golden intrusion forms a cross dividing the section into four equal quadrants. The compressed layer matches one quadrant in size.
We need to infer rule. The description: golden intrusion forms a cross dividing into four quadrants. In inputs, there is a row of Y across middle? Indeed all examples have a full row of Y across entire width (the golden intrusion). Also a column of Y? Actually cross: both row and column of Y? Let's examine example 1 input: grid size? Let's count rows: appears 11 rows? Actually example 1 input lines: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, 9 columns. The Y row is row 6 (index 5). Also there is a column of Y? Let's check column 5 (0-index?) Actually column 5 (the 5th index) maybe all Y? Let's see each row column 5 (0-index 4) is Y indeed: row1 col5 Y, row2 col5 Y, etc. So there is a vertical line of Y as well, forming a cross dividing into four quadrants of equal size (since grid 11x9, cross at row6 and column5). So quadrants are top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right each of size 5x4? Actually rows above cross: 5 rows, below: 5 rows. Columns left of cross: 4 columns, right: 4 columns. So each quadrant is 5x4. The output grid size matches one quadrant: 5 rows, 4 columns. Indeed output example 1 is 5 rows, 4 columns. Now rule: compress quadrants into single layer, overlapping with hardness ordering: "harder mineral displaces softer". Need to know hardness ranking among colors: maybe based on typical order? Not given. We need infer from examples. We have four quadrants each containing colors (excluding Y and .). The compression likely overlays the four quadrants onto each other, aligning them onto same coordinates (like stacking). The order of stacking maybe top-left over top-right over bottom-left over bottom-right? Or some order based on "hardness". Need to deduce. Let's extract quadrants for example1. Define quadrants: Top-left (TL): rows 0-4, cols 0-3. Top-right (TR): rows 0-4, cols 5-8? Wait column index after cross: columns 5-8 (since col4 is Y). Actually columns 5-8 (4 columns). Bottom-left (BL): rows 6-10, cols 0-3. Bottom-right (BR): rows 6-10, cols 5-8. Let's list TL grid (5x4): Rows0-4, cols0-3: Row0: . O . . Row1: O O . . Row2: . . . . Row3: . O O O Row4: . . O O TR (rows0-4, cols5-8): Row0: W . W . Row1: W . . . Row2: W . W W Row3: . . . . Row4: . . W W BL (rows6-10, cols0-3): Row6: . R R . Row7: R R . R Row8: R . R R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . . . BR (rows6-10, cols5-8): Row6: A A . . Row7: A . A A Row8: . A . A Row9: . A A . Row10: . . A . Now output (5x4): Row0: A A W . Row1: A O A A Row2: W A W A Row3: R A A O Row4: R . A O We need to see how each cell derived from overlapping four quadrants at same relative position. Let's compute for each position (i,j) (0-4 rows,0-3 cols) the four values from quadrants TL, TR, BL, BR. I'll create table. i0 j0: TL '.' ; TR 'W' (since TR row0 col0 corresponds to original col5) ; BL '.' ... [8020 chars truncated]
"Four sauces are prepared in separate compartments of a divided pan. When the dividers are lifted, flavors blend at each spot — but some flavors are bolder and always dominate milder ones in the final taste."
120b: fail
See: A sectioned cooking vessel with bright dividers, each compartment holding dollops of a different colored sauce against a dark base.
Do: Lift the dividers and let the sauces mingle position by position. Where multiple sauces overlap, the boldest flavor prevails. Spots with no sauce stay clean.
Grid: The dividers form a bright cross splitting the pan into four equal sections. The finished plate matches the size of one section.
We need to infer rule. The description: "sectioned cooking vessel with bright dividers, each compartment holding dollops of a different colored sauce against a dark base. Lift the dividers and let the sauces mingle position by position. Where multiple sauces overlap, the boldest flavor prevails. Spots with no sauce stay clean. Grid details: The dividers form a bright cross splitting the pan into four equal sections. The finished plate matches the size of one section." Interpretation: Input grid contains a cross (bright) dividing into four quadrants. The cross likely is the row of Y (yellow) across middle and column of Y? In examples, there is a full row of Y across entire width (row 6) and a column of Y across entire height (col 5). Indeed in example 1 input, there is a row of Y's (row index 5 zero-based?) Let's examine: Example1 input grid size? Let's count rows: lines given: 1 ". O . . Y W . W ." 2 "O O . . Y W . . ." 3 ". . . . Y W . W W" 4 ". O O O Y . . . ." 5 ". . O O Y . . W W" 6 "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 7 ". R R . Y A A . ." 8 "R R . R Y A . A A" 9 "R . R R Y . A . A" 10 "R . R R Y . A A ." 11 "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, 9 columns. The Y row is row 6 (index 5) all Y. Also there is a column of Y? Let's check column 5 (0-index?) Actually column 5 (the 5th element) appears Y in many rows: row1 col5 Y, row2 col5 Y, row3 col5 Y, row4 col5 Y, row5 col5 Y, row6 col5 Y, row7 col5 Y, row8 col5 Y, row9 col5 Y, row10 col5 Y, row11 col5 Y. Yes column 5 is all Y. So cross of Y dividing grid into four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The cross is bright (Y). The quadrants contain other colors: top-left has O, W etc; top-right also; bottom-left has R; bottom-right has A etc. Goal: "Lift the dividers and let the sauces mingle position by position. Where multiple sauces overlap, the boldest flavor prevails. Spots with no sauce stay clean. The finished plate matches the size of one section." Interpretation: We need to overlay the four quadrants onto each other (like stacking) after removing the cross, resulting in a grid the size of one quadrant (i.e., half rows and half columns). The "boldest flavor" maybe priority order of colors? Possibly based on some ranking: maybe order of colors in key? Or maybe based on brightness: Y is bright cross, but not used after removal. Among overlapping colors, the "boldest" could be determined by some hierarchy: maybe R > A > W > O > etc? Let's deduce from example. We need to compute output for example1 and see mapping. First, define quadrants: Since cross at row6 (index5) and column5 (index4? Wait columns count 9, column index 4 is the 5th column). So quadrants each size: rows 0-4 (5 rows) top, rows 6-10 (5 rows) bottom. Columns 0-3 (4 columns) left, columns 5-8 (4 columns) right. So each quadrant 5x4. Output size in example1 is 5 rows? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. Yes matches quadrant size. Now we n ... [8826 chars truncated]
"Four instrumental parts are written on a quartered score separated by golden bar lines. When performed together, only the loudest instrument rings through at each beat — the rest are drowned out by its resonance."
120b: k=3
See: A musical manuscript divided by golden staff lines into four voice parts, each notated in a different color ink against blank measures.
Do: Layer all four parts into a single performance. At each beat, the instrument with the greatest volume carries through. Silent beats in all parts remain rests.
Grid: Golden lines cross the score horizontally and vertically, creating four equal voice blocks. The combined performance fills a space the size of one block.
We need to infer rule. The description: grid divided by golden lines horizontally and vertically creating four equal voice blocks. The combined performance fills a space the size of one block. So input grid likely 11x9? Let's examine example 1 input dimensions. Count rows: lines given: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, each 9 columns. So grid 11x9. Golden lines cross horizontally and vertically creating four equal voice blocks. Likely the central row of Y's (all Y) is a horizontal golden line? Indeed row 6 is all Y. That could be a horizontal staff line dividing top and bottom halves. Also there may be vertical golden lines of Y column? Let's see column 5 is all Y? Check each row column 5 (0-index?). Let's index columns 1-9. Column 5 appears Y in all rows: row1 col5 Y, row2 col5 Y, row3 col5 Y, row4 col5 Y, row5 col5 Y, row6 col5 Y, row7 col5 Y, row8 col5 Y, row9 col5 Y, row10 col5 Y, row11 col5 Y. Yes column 5 all Y. So vertical line of Y's dividing left and right halves. So the grid is divided into four quadrants (blocks) by the central cross of Y's (both row and column). The Y's are like golden staff lines. Thus each quadrant contains colored cells (non-Y, non-.) representing a voice part. The rule: "Layer all four parts into a single performance. At each beat, the instrument with the greatest volume carries through. Silent beats in all parts remain rests." So we need to overlay the four quadrants onto a single block (size of one block). That means we take each quadrant (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) and combine them into a single 5x4? Wait block size: Since grid is 11x9, with central row and column of Y's, each quadrant is (rows above/below) 5 rows (since 11 rows total, central row is row6, leaving 5 rows above, 5 below). Columns left/right: 4 columns each (since 9 columns total, central column col5, leaving 4 left, 4 right). So each block is 5 rows x 4 columns. The output examples are 5 rows x 4 columns indeed. Example1 output has 5 rows each 4 entries. So we need to combine the four quadrants into one 5x4 output. Now rule: At each position (i,j) within block, we have up to four colors from the four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). Need to select the one with greatest "volume". Likely a priority ordering of colors. Maybe based on some ranking: maybe order: A > O > W > R > ... Not sure. Let's examine example1 to deduce priority. First, extract quadrants from example1 input. I'll label rows 1-11, cols 1-9. Top-left quadrant: rows 1-5, cols 1-4. Rows1-5, cols1-4: r1: . O . . r2: O O . . r3: . . . . r4: . O O O r5: . . O O Top-right quadrant: rows1-5, cols6-9 (since col5 is Y). cols6-9: r1 col6 W,7 .,8 W,9 . => W . W . r2: col6 W,7 .,8 .,9 . => W . . . r3: col6 W,7 .,8 W,9 W = ... [8242 chars truncated]
"Four teams train on quadrants of a field separated by chalk lines. On game day, players from all teams rush onto a single field — but a strict pecking order determines who claims each position when two players collide."
120b: fail
See: A playing field quartered by bright boundary lines, with differently-uniformed players scattered across each section against dark turf.
Do: Collapse all four quadrants onto one field. Where players from multiple teams want the same spot, the higher-ranked team's player takes it. Unclaimed spots stay empty.
Grid: Bright chalk lines divide the field into four equal quadrants. The final game field is the size of one quadrant.
We need to infer rule. From description: grid divided by bright boundary lines into four quadrants. In examples, there is a row of Y's across middle? Indeed both inputs have a full row of Y across entire width, likely the bright boundary line separating top and bottom halves. Also there is a column of Y? Let's examine example1 input dimensions: appears 11 rows? Let's count: lines given: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, 9 columns. The Y row is row 6 (index 5). Also there is a column of Y? Let's check column 5 (0-index?) Actually each row has Y at position 5? Let's see first row: ". O . . Y W . W ." Y at column 5 (1-index 5?). Row length 9, columns 0-8. Y appears at column 4? Let's index: characters: 0 '.';1 'O';2 '.';3 '.';4 'Y';5 'W';6 '.';7 'W';8 '.' So Y at col4. Row2: "O O . . Y W . . ." Y at col4. Row3: ". . . . Y W . W W" Y at col4. Row4: ". O O O Y . . . ." Y at col4. Row5: ". . O O Y . . W W" Y at col4. Row6: all Y across all columns. Row7: ". R R . Y A A . ." Y at col4. Row8: "R R . R Y A . A A" Y at col4. Row9: "R . R R Y . A . A" Y at col4. Row10: "R . R R Y . A A ." Y at col4. Row11: "R . . . Y . . A ." Y at col4. So there is a vertical line of Y at column 4 (the middle column) and a horizontal line of Y at row 5 (middle row). So the grid is divided into four quadrants by a cross of Y's. The quadrants are top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right, each of size 5x4? Actually total rows 11, columns 9. The cross occupies row 5 (index5) and column 4 (index4). So quadrants are 5 rows above, 5 rows below, and 4 columns left, 4 columns right. So each quadrant size 5x4. The output grid size is one quadrant (4 columns? Actually output example1 is 5 rows? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. Yes matches quadrant size (rows = 5, cols = 4). So rule: collapse quadrants onto one field (size of one quadrant). For each position (i,j) within quadrant, we need to consider the four corresponding cells from each quadrant (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) that map onto that position when collapsed onto one quadrant. The higher-ranked team's player takes it. Need ranking order of colors? Based on examples. We need to map: For each position in output (row r, col c) where r from 0..4 (top quadrant rows), c from 0..3 (left quadrant columns). The four source cells are: - top-left quadrant: at (r, c) - top-right quadrant: at (r, c+5?) Actually right side columns start after column 4 (Y). So column index = c + 5? Since column 4 is Y, column 5 is first right column. So right quadrant column = c + 5 (since left quadrant width 4). So top-right cell = (r, c+5) - bottom-left quadrant: row = r+6? Since row 5 is Y, row 6 is first bottom row. So bottom-left = (r+6, c) - bottom-right = ... [7670 chars truncated]
"Four weather fronts press inward from the quadrants of a radar map divided by a golden jet stream cross. Where fronts collide, the most powerful system always overwrites the weaker ones on the forecast."
120b: fail
See: A radar screen split by bright jet stream bands into four zones, each showing a different-colored weather pattern against clear skies.
Do: Merge the four zones into a single forecast. Where multiple fronts compete for the same area, the most energetic system dominates. Clear zones stay clear.
Grid: The jet stream forms a bright cross creating four equal radar quadrants. The merged forecast occupies the area of one quadrant.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 11 rows? Let's count: lines given: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, each 9 columns. Output grid appears 5 rows, 4 columns? Let's see lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So transformation: take one quadrant (maybe lower-left?) of input? The description: jet stream forms bright cross creating four equal radar quadrants. Merged forecast occupies area of one quadrant. So output is size of quadrant (half rows, half cols). Input 11x9 not even. But there is a central row of Y's (all Y) and central column of Y's? Let's examine input: row 6 is all Y. Column 5 maybe all Y? Let's check each row column 5 (index starting 1): row1 col5 Y, row2 col5 Y, row3 col5 Y, row4 col5 Y, row5 col5 Y, row6 col5 Y, row7 col5 Y, row8 col5 Y, row9 col5 Y, row10 col5 Y, row11 col5 Y. Yes column 5 all Y. So cross of Y's dividing grid into four quadrants: top-left (rows1-5, cols1-4), top-right (rows1-5, cols6-9), bottom-left (rows7-11, cols1-4), bottom-right (rows7-11, cols6-9). The central row (row6) and column (col5) are Y's. Output size 5x4 corresponds to quadrant size (rows 5, cols 4). Which quadrant? Output contains colors from various quadrants merged according to rule: "Where multiple fronts compete for the same area, the most energetic system dominates. Clear zones stay clear." The colors: A azure, O orange, W maroon, R red, . black. We need to see mapping: For each position in quadrant (relative), we need to consider the four quadrants' corresponding cells? Actually each quadrant cell corresponds to same relative position across quadrants. For each relative position (i,j) within quadrant, we have four cells: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Need to combine them according to dominance hierarchy (most energetic). Determine hierarchy from example. Let's list for each relative coordinate (r=1..5, c=1..4). We'll extract the four cells. I'll index rows 1-5 top-left quadrant rows1-5, cols1-4. Create table of TL cells (rows1-5, cols1-4): Row1: . O . . Row2: O O . . Row3: . . . . Row4: . O O O Row5: . . O O TR cells (rows1-5, cols6-9): Rows1 cols6-9: W . W . Row2: W . . . Row3: W . W W Row4: . . . . Row5: . . W W BL cells (rows7-11, cols1-4): Rows7: . R R . Row8: R R . R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . R R Row11: R . . . BR cells (rows7-11, cols6-9): Rows7: A A . . Row8: A . A A Row9: . A . A A Row10: . A A A . Row11: . . A . Now output 5x4 grid: Row1: A A W . Row2: A O A A Row3: W A W A Row4: R A A O Row5: R . A O Now we need to see how each output cell derived from the four inputs. Let's compute for each position (r,c). I'll list the four values TL, TR, BL, BR. Pos (1,1): TL '.' ; TR 'W' ; BL '.' ; BR 'A' => output 'A'. So among ... [6739 chars truncated]
"Four architects each design a floor plan for one wing of a building separated by golden load-bearing walls. When the plans are overlaid, a strict building code determines whose design element takes precedence at each contested space."
120b: fail
See: A blueprint quartered by golden structural walls, each wing sketched in a different color against empty floor space.
Do: Overlay all four wing plans into one unified blueprint. Where designs overlap, the code-mandated priority determines which architect's element is built. Undesigned spaces remain open.
Grid: Golden walls form a cross dividing the blueprint into four equal wings. The unified plan matches the dimensions of a single wing.
We need to infer rule. The description: golden walls form a cross dividing blueprint into four equal wings. In examples, there is a row of Y across middle? In example input, there is a row of Y across entire width at row 5 (0-index?). Let's examine example 1 input grid dimensions: looks like 11 rows? Let's count lines: 1 ". O . . Y W . W ." 2 "O O . . Y W . . ." 3 ". . . . Y W . W W" 4 ". O O O Y . . . ." 5 ". . O O Y . . W W" 6 "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" 7 ". R R . Y A A . ." 8 "R R . R Y A . A A" 9 "R . R R Y . A . A" 10 "R . R R Y . A A ." 11 "R . . . Y . . A ." So 11 rows, 9 columns. The golden walls likely are the Y row (yellow) across middle row (row 6) and a column of Y? Let's see column of Y: column 5 (0-index?) Actually each row has Y at column 5 (the 5th element). Indeed each row has Y at position 5 (1-index?). So there is a cross of Y forming golden walls dividing into four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The output grid matches dimensions of a single wing (i.e., quadrant). Output is 5 rows? Let's see output lines: 5 rows, each varying length? Output given: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O R . . . Y . . A .? Wait that's not output. Actually output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So quadrant size is 5 rows (half of 11? Actually 11 rows, cross row is row 6, so top half rows 1-5 =5 rows. Bottom half rows 7-11 =5 rows. Similarly columns left of Y column (col1-4) =4 columns, right side col6-9 =4 columns. So quadrant size 5x4 matches output. Now rule: overlay four wing plans into one unified blueprint. Each wing originally contains colored elements (non-Y, non-.)? The cross Y is walls, not part of wings. The quadrants contain various colors: top-left quadrant (rows1-5, cols1-4) includes O, ., etc. top-right quadrant (rows1-5, cols6-9) includes W etc. bottom-left quadrant (rows7-11, cols1-4) includes R etc. bottom-right quadrant (rows7-11, cols6-9) includes A etc. Goal: overlay all four quadrants onto a single quadrant (size same as each). Overlap priority determines which color appears where. Need to deduce priority order. Let's compute overlay: For each position (i,j) within quadrant (size 5x4), we have four cells: TL (top-left), TR (top-right), BL (bottom-left), BR (bottom-right). We need to combine them into output cell. Let's map coordinates: Use row index 0-4 for quadrant rows (top half). Column index 0-3 for left half. TL cell = input row i, col j. TR cell = input row i, col (j+5?) Actually Y column is at index 4 (0-based). So right side starts at col 5 (0-based). So TR = row i, col j+5. BL = row i+6? Actually bottom rows start at row 6 (0-based) after Y row (row5). So BL = row i+6, col j. BR = row i+6, col j+5. Now we need to see output values. Let's compute for each position using example. I'll write TL matrix (5x4): Rows1-5, cols1-4: Row1: ". O . ." Row2: "O O . ." Row3: ". . . ." Row4: ". O O O" Row5: ". . O O" TR matrix (rows1-5, cols6-9) ... [7129 chars truncated]
"Four armies occupy quadrants of a battlefield separated by a scorched no-man's-land cross. When the ceasefire ends, they advance inward — but a strict chain of command means the superior force always holds contested ground."
120b: k=3
See: A battlefield map divided by bright scorched corridors into four sectors, each occupied by a differently-bannered army against empty terrain.
Do: All four armies advance onto a single contested zone. Where forces overlap, the army with higher rank holds the ground. Unoccupied positions stay neutral.
Grid: The scorched corridors form a bright cross creating four equal sectors. The contested zone matches one sector in size.
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. Input grid seems larger (11x9?) Actually each input appears 11 rows, 9 columns? Let's count Example1 input rows: lines show 11 rows, each with 9 entries separated by spaces. Output appears 5 rows, 4 columns. So transformation reduces to quadrant? The description: cross dividing into four sectors, contested zone matches one sector in size. So likely we take one quadrant (sector) and overlay armies moving towards center? Let's analyze. In inputs, there is a horizontal line of Y across middle row (row 6) all Y. That's the bright cross corridor (scorched corridor). Also a vertical line of Y column 5? Let's check column 5 (index starting 1). In example1 input rows: first row: ". O . . Y W . W ." column5 Y. second row: "O O . . Y W . . ." column5 Y. So column5 all Y. So cross of Y dividing grid into four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right). The Y cross is the contested zone? Actually description: contested zone matches one sector in size. So maybe we take one quadrant (e.g., top-left) as contested zone? The armies: colors O (orange), W (maroon), R (red), A (azure) appear in quadrants. O appears in top-left quadrant? Let's map quadrants: rows 1-5 top, rows 7-11 bottom (since row6 is Y). Columns 1-4 left, columns 6-9 right (col5 Y). So quadrants: TL rows1-5 cols1-4, TR rows1-5 cols6-9, BL rows7-11 cols1-4, BR rows7-11 cols6-9. In example1, TL contains O and . and maybe some W? Let's view TL 5x4 region: rows1-5, cols1-4: Row1: . O . . Row2: O O . . Row3: . . . . Row4: . O O O Row5: . . O O So colors: O and . only. TR (rows1-5, cols6-9): Rows1: W . W . Row2: W . . . Row3: W . W W Row4: . . . . Row5: . W W So colors: W and . maybe. BL (rows7-11, cols1-4): Rows7: . R R . Row8: R R . R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . R R Row11: R . . . Colors: R and . . BR (rows7-11, cols6-9): Rows7: A A . . Row8: . A . A Row9: . . A . A Row10: . A A . Row11: . . A A Colors: A and . . So each quadrant has a distinct army color (O, W, R, A). The output is 5x4 grid. Let's see output example1: Rows: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O R . . A . Wait output lines: Actually given output 5 rows each 4 columns: Row1: A A W . Row2: A O A A Row3: W A W A Row4: R A A O Row5: R . A O But there are 5 rows? Actually output shows 5 rows, each 4 entries. Yes. Now how derived? Possibly each cell in output corresponds to overlapping of armies moving towards center (the Y cross). The contested zone matches one sector in size: maybe we take the sector (quadrant) that is contested (center) size equals quadrant (5x4). The armies advance onto that zone from each quadrant, overlapping according to rank hierarchy. Rank order maybe: A > O > W > R? Let's infer from overlapping results. We need to simulate each army moving into the contested zone (which is maybe the central area originally Y cross? But contested zone matches one sector in size, maybe we take the TL quadrant as the zone and overlay other quadrants onto it afte ... [9837 chars truncated]
"Four spotlight colors illuminate different quarters of a stage divided by golden curtain tracks. When the curtains open, all lights hit the same stage — but brighter spotlights always wash out dimmer ones where they overlap."
120b: k=1
See: A stage divided by golden curtain rails into four acting areas, each lit by a different colored spotlight against darkness.
Do: Open all curtains and let the spotlights merge onto one stage. Where multiple colors overlap, the brightest light dominates. Unlit areas stay dark.
Grid: Golden curtain tracks form a cross dividing the stage into four equal areas. The lit stage matches the size of one area.
We need to infer rule. The description: golden curtain tracks form a cross dividing stage into four equal areas. The lit stage matches size of one area. So input grid contains a cross (maybe a row and column of a certain color) dividing into quadrants. The output is a smaller grid equal to one quadrant size, merging the four quadrants' colored patterns with priority brightest (maybe order of colors). Let's examine example. Example 1 Input grid size? Let's count rows: lines given: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, each 9 columns? Let's count first row: ". O . . Y W . W ." = 9. So 11x9. Cross likely the row of Y's? Indeed there is a full row of Y across row 6 (index 5) all Y. Also a column of Y? Let's check column 5 (0-index?) Actually column 5 maybe the 5th column (index 4) appears Y in many rows: each row has Y at column 5 (the middle column). Indeed each row has Y at position 5 (0-index 4). So cross of Y's dividing grid into four quadrants each 5 rows x4 columns? Since total rows 11, cross row at row 6 (index5) splits top 5 rows and bottom 5 rows. Columns 9, cross column at column5 splits left 4 columns and right 4 columns. So each quadrant is 5x4. Output grid size appears 5 rows x4 columns? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. Yes matches quadrant size. Now rule: "Open all curtains and let the spotlights merge onto one stage. Where multiple colors overlap, the brightest light dominates. Unlit areas stay dark." Interpretation: For each position in the quadrant (relative coordinates), we have four corresponding cells from the four quadrants (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) that are aligned relative to the cross. When we "open curtains", we overlay them onto one stage (maybe top-left quadrant becomes base, then overlay others). The brightest light dominates: need ordering of colors brightness. Which is brightest? Possibly based on given color key order? Not sure. Let's deduce from example. We need to map each output cell to combination of four input cells at same relative position in each quadrant. Let's label quadrants: TL (rows 0-4, cols 0-3), TR (rows 0-4, cols 5-8), BL (rows 6-10, cols 0-3), BR (rows 6-10, cols 5-8). (Rows 5 is Y row, column 4 is Y column). Output cell (i,j) corresponds to TL[i][j], TR[i][j], BL[i][j], BR[i][j] (where i 0-4, j 0-3). Need to combine. Let's compute for a few positions using example to infer priority. I'll write TL matrix (5x4): Rows 0-4, cols0-3: Row0: . O . . Row1: O O . . Row2: . . . . Row3: . O O O Row4: . . O O TR matrix (rows0-4, cols5-8): Row0: W . W . Row1: W . . . Row2: W . W W Row3: . . . . Row4: . . W W BL matrix (rows6-10, cols0-3): Row6: . R R . Row7: R R . R Row8: R . R R Row9: R . R R Row10: R . . . BR matri ... [9361 chars truncated]
"Four varieties of flower are planted in quadrants of a garden bed separated by golden stone paths. When they spread, some species are more aggressive and always choke out gentler neighbors where their root zones overlap."
120b: fail
See: A garden bed quartered by golden stone walkways, each section planted with a different-colored flower against bare soil.
Do: Let the flowers spread across all sections. Where multiple varieties compete for the same patch, the most invasive species wins. Bare patches remain unplanted.
Grid: Golden paths form a cross dividing the bed into four equal planting zones. The mature garden fills the space of one zone.
We need to infer rule. The description: golden paths cross dividing grid into four quadrants. In examples, there is a row of Y across middle? Indeed in inputs, there is a full row of Y across entire width (row of Y's). That's the golden path? Actually Y is yellow, maybe representing golden walkway. The cross: also a column of Y? In examples, there is a column of Y? Let's examine Example1 input: grid size? Let's count rows: Input lines: ". O . . Y W . W ." "O O . . Y W . . ." ". . . . Y W . W W" ". O O O Y . . . ." ". . O O Y . . W W" "Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y" ". R R . Y A A . ." "R R . R Y A . A A" "R . R R Y . A . A" "R . R R Y . A A ." "R . . . Y . . A ." That's 11 rows, 9 columns. The Y row is row 6 (index 5) all Y. Also there is a column of Y? Let's check column 5 (0-index?) Actually column 5 (the 5th index) maybe all Y? Let's look at each row column 5 (starting 0): Row1: positions: . O . . Y W . W . => column 5 is Y (index 4). Row2: O O . . Y W . . . => column5 Y. Row3: . . . . Y W . W W => Y. Row4: . O O O Y . . . . => Y. Row5: . . O O Y . . W W => Y. Row6: Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y => Y. Row7: . R R . Y A A . . => Y. Row8: R R . R Y A . A A => Y. Row9: R . R R Y . A . A => Y. Row10: R . R R Y . A A . => Y. Row11: R . . . Y . . A . => Y. So indeed there is a full column of Y (the 5th column) and a full row of Y (the 6th row). So cross of Y dividing grid into four quadrants. The description says golden paths (Y) form a cross dividing bed into four equal planting zones. The mature garden fills the space of one zone. In each example, there is a region (one quadrant) filled with other colors (maybe O, W, etc) representing "flowers". The rule: "Let the flowers spread across all sections. Where multiple varieties compete for the same patch, the most invasive species wins. Bare patches remain unplanted." Interpretation: The non-Y colors in each quadrant are to be replicated (mirrored?) into other quadrants across the Y cross, perhaps overlapping where they conflict, with a priority order (most invasive species wins). The output grids are smaller? In Example1 output: 5 rows, 4 columns? Let's see output lines: "A A W ." "A O A A" "W A W A" "R A A O" "R . A O" That's 5 rows, 4 columns. So output is quadrant size? Input quadrants each are maybe 5x4? Input size 11x9. The cross splits into quadrants: top-left quadrant rows 0-4 (5 rows) and columns 0-3 (4 columns). Indeed top-left quadrant size 5x4. Output appears to be that quadrant after transformation? Let's verify: In Example1, top-left quadrant (rows 0-4, cols 0-3) values: Rows0-4, cols0-3: Row0: . O . . Row1: O O . . Row2: . . . . Row3: . O O O Row4: . . O O That's 5x4 grid. Output is: A A W . A O A A W A W A R A A O R . A O So output is not same as original quadrant; it's transformed based on spreading of colors from other quadrants. Let's examine other quadrants: top-right quadrant (rows0-4, cols5-8) (since column5 is Y, columns after Y are 6-8? Actually columns index: 0- ... [11349 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 10x10 grid divided into four 5x5 quadrants. Each quadrant uses exactly one non-black color paired with black (.) cells: Top-Left uses Yellow (Y), Top-Right uses Green (G), Bottom-Left uses Maroon (W), and Bottom-Right uses Azure (A). Each quadrant forms a sparse pattern of its color against a black background.
Do: To produce the 5x5 output grid, overlay all four quadrants cell by cell. For each position (r, c) where r ranges 0-4 and c ranges 0-4, examine the corresponding cell in each quadrant: Top-Left at (r, c), Top-Right at (r, c+5), Bottom-Left at (r+5, c), Bottom-Right at (r+5, c+5). Each quadrant cell is either its designated color or black. Assign the output cell using this strict priority order from highest to lowest: Green (G) > Maroon (W) > Azure (A) > Yellow (Y) > black (.). That is, if Green is present in any quadrant at that position, output Green. Otherwise if Maroon is present, output Maroon. Otherwise if Azure is present, output Azure. Otherwise if Yellow is present, output Yellow. Otherwise output black (.).
Grid: The input grid is always 10x10, composed of four non-overlapping 5x5 quadrants arranged in a 2x2 layout. The output grid is always 5x5. Each input quadrant contains exactly one chromatic color (Yellow, Green, Maroon, or Azure) plus black cells. The output uses all four colors plus black.
"Four voices singing in a round, but the strongest voice always wins the note."
120b: k=1
See: A stage is divided into four equal chambers. In each chamber, a single singer performs against silence — Yellow hums in the top-left, Green belts from the top-right, Maroon growls from the bottom-left, and Azure whispers from the bottom-right. Each performer's song is scattered across their chamber: some notes ring out, others are rests.
Do: The four chambers collapse into one shared stage, and at every position the singers compete for who is heard. Green has the most powerful voice and drowns out everyone. Maroon cuts through all but Green. Azure overpowers only the timid Yellow. Yellow is barely audible, singing only where no one else stands. Where all four singers rest, the audience hears nothing but silence.
Grid: The full concert hall is a 10×10 space with four 5×5 sound booths arranged in a square. When the walls come down, a single 5×5 performance remains — a chord at each position determined by whichever voice carries the farthest. The final song shimmers with all four colors and pockets of silence.
We need to infer rule. Input is 10x10 with four 5x5 quadrants: top-left (rows0-4, cols0-4), top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9), bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4), bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9). Output is 5x5 representing merged quadrant according to priority: Green > Maroon > Azure > Yellow > empty (.)? Let's verify with example. We need to map colors: G=green, W=maroon, A=azure, Y=yellow, . black (silence). In description: Green most powerful, drowns out everyone. Maroon cuts through all but Green. Azure overpowers only Yellow. Yellow only where no one else stands. Where all four rest, silence. Thus priority order: Green > Maroon > Azure > Yellow > . (silence). Also if multiple same? Not needed. Now we need to combine corresponding cells from four quadrants: For each position (i,j) within 5x5, look at four cells: TL[i][j], TR[i][j], BL[i][j], BR[i][j]. Determine which color appears according to priority. If a cell is '.' (black) meaning no note. So we need to pick highest priority non-'.' among the four. If all '.' then '.'. Let's test with example 1 to ensure matches output. We need to extract quadrants from example input. Example Input 10x10 lines: Row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" Row1: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." Row2: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." Row3: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." Row4: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G" Row5: ". W . W W . . . A ." Row6: "W . . W W . A A . A" Row7: ". . . W . . . A A ." Row8: ". . W W . A . A . ." Row9: "W W . W . . A . A A" Let's index rows 0-9, cols0-9. Now TL quadrant rows0-4 cols0-4: Rows0-4, cols0-4: r0: . Y Y Y . r1: Y Y . . . r2: Y . . Y Y r3: . . Y . Y r4: . . Y Y Y TR quadrant rows0-4 cols5-9: r0 cols5-9: . . . G G r1: G . G G . r2: . G G G . r3: G . . G . r4: G G G G G BL quadrant rows5-9 cols0-4: r5: . W . W W r6: W . . W W r7: . . . W . r8: . . W W . r9: W W . W . BR quadrant rows5-9 cols5-9: r5: . . . A . r6: . A A . A r7: . . A A . r8: A . A . . r9: . A . A A Now compute output 5x5 using priority. Let's list each position (i,j) 0-4. I'll create table. i0 row0: j0: TL '.' ; TR '.' ; BL '.' ; BR '.'? Wait BR row5 col5? Actually position (0,0) corresponds to rows0 TL, rows0 TR, rows5 BL, rows5 BR? No mapping: For each i (0-4) corresponds to row i in TL and row i in TR; for BL and BR rows i+5. Similarly columns j. So for (0,0): TL r0c0 = '.' TR r0c5 = '.' (col5) BL r5c0 = '.' (row5 col0) BR r5c5 = '.' (row5 col5) All '.' => output '.' matches example output row0 col0 '.' yes. j1 (0,1): TL r0c1 = 'Y' TR r0c6 = '.' (col6) BL r5c1 = 'W' BR r5c6 = '.' (col6) Now priority: Green > Maroon (W) > Azure (A) > Yellow (Y). No G, have W and Y. Maroon higher than Yellow, so output should be W. Example output row0 col1 = 'W' yes. j2 (0,2): TL r0c2 = 'Y' TR r0c7 = '.' (col7) BL r5c2 = '.' (row5 col2) BR r5c7 = '.' (row5 col7) Only Y => output Y. Example row0 col2 = 'Y' yes. j3 (0,3): TL r0c3 = 'Y' TR r0c8 = 'G' BL r5c3 = 'W' BR r5c8 = 'A' Now we have G, W, A, Y. Highest priority G => output G. ... [5990 chars truncated]
"Four colonies compete for territory in a shared petri dish, but some species are simply more dominant."
120b: fail
See: A microscope slide divided into four culture zones, each teeming with a different single-colored organism against sterile black medium.
Do: The cultures are released into a shared dish. Where multiple organisms claim the same site, the more dominant species always colonizes it. One species reigns supreme over all others, while the weakest only survives where no competitors reach.
Grid: The shared dish is half the size of the slide in each dimension. Each site shows whichever organism outcompeted the rest at that location, or remains sterile if none arrived.
We need to infer rule. From description: Input grid is larger (maybe 10x10) and output is half size (5x5). Each 2x2 block? Let's examine example1: Input size? Let's count rows: given lines 10 rows each with 10 entries? Example1 input lines: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 columns. So 10x10 input. Output is 5x5. So transformation: each 2x2 block maps to one cell based on dominance hierarchy. We need to deduce hierarchy of colors. Description: "more dominant species always colonizes it. One species reigns supreme over all others, while the weakest only survives where no competitors reach." So there is total ordering of colors. Need to infer from examples. We have colors: Y, G, W, A, maybe others. In outputs we see only Y, G, W, A, maybe . (black). So hierarchy among Y, G, W, A. Let's see example1: Input 2x2 blocks produce output. Let's map first block (rows1-2, cols1-2): Rows1: . Y Row2: Y Y So colors present: . (black), Y. Output cell (row1 col1) is '.'? Let's see output grid row1 col1 is '.' (from output: ". W Y G G" first row). Yes '.'. So rule: if Y present but also . maybe . dominates? But . is black sterile medium, maybe considered lowest? But output is '.' meaning maybe if any '.' present, output '.'? Let's test other blocks. Block rows1-2 cols3-4 (col3 col4): Rows1: Y Y Row2: . . (since row2 col3 is '.'? Wait row2 line: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." Actually row2 col3 is '.' col4 is '.' ) So colors: Y and . . Output row1 col2 is 'W' according to output row1: ". W Y G G". So not '.'. So need to compute dominance: maybe each color has a strength, and the strongest among the four cells wins. But why first block gave '.'? Maybe '.' considered strongest? But later block gave W, which is not present in that block (Y and .). Wait W not present in block rows1-2 cols3-4. So maybe rule involves neighboring blocks? Hmm. Maybe transformation is like each output cell is result of competition among four corresponding quadrants of the input after "releasing cultures into shared dish". The input is four quadrants each of size 5x5 (since slide divided into four culture zones). The shared dish is half size each dimension (5x5). So each output cell corresponds to the same position across the four quadrants (i.e., overlay of four 5x5 zones). So input 10x10 is composed of four 5x5 quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. They are placed like: Rows 0-4, cols0-4 = quadrant1 (maybe zone1) Rows 0-4, cols5-9 = quadrant2 Rows5-9, cols0-4 = quadrant3 Rows5-9, cols5-9 = quadrant4 Then each output cell (i,j) is result of competition among the four cells at same relative position in each quadrant. That matches description: slide divided into four culture zones each with single-colored organism against black medium. So each quadrant contains only one color plus black? Let's check example1 input quadrants. Take top-left quadrant (rows1-5, cols1-5). Let's list (using 1-index). Rows1-5, cols1-5: Row1: . Y Y Y . Row2: Y Y . . . Row3: Y . . Y Y Row4: . . Y ... [10414 chars truncated]
"Four nebulae drift into the same region of space, and wherever their gases mix, only the densest cloud remains visible."
120b: fail
See: A star chart quartered into four sectors, each showing a different colored nebula's gas clouds scattered against the void.
Do: The nebulae overlap into one sector. Where multiple gases coexist, the densest cloud absorbs all light and dominates the view. There is a strict density hierarchy — the heaviest element always wins. The void persists only where no gas has drifted.
Grid: The merged sector is one quadrant in size. Each point shows the densest nebula present, or empty space where no cloud reached.
We need to infer rule. From description: merging quadrants? Input grids are larger (10x10?) Output smaller (5x5). Likely each output cell corresponds to a 2x2 block of input? Let's examine example1: Input size? Provided lines: first line ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 columns. There are 10 rows. Output is 5x5. So rule: combine each 2x2 block into one cell, picking "densest" according to hierarchy. Hierarchy: "heaviest element always wins". Need order of colors. From description: colors represent gases with density hierarchy. Need to deduce order from examples. We need to map each 2x2 block to output cell. Let's test with example1. Compute first 2x2 block (rows1-2, cols1-2): Rows1: . Y Row2: Y Y So block: . Y / Y Y => colors: . (black), Y, Y, Y. Output cell (row1 col1) is '.' according to output? Output first row: ". W Y G G". So first cell is '.' matches? Yes output (1,1) = '.' . So rule picks '.' over Y? That suggests hierarchy: '.' (black) is highest density? But description says void persists only where no gas reached, i.e., '.' only when no gas present. In block there are Y present, so why '.'? Maybe we misaligned. Maybe output grid is not 2x2 but something else like overlapping quadrants? Let's compute other cells. Output (1,2) = 'W'. Which block corresponds? columns 3-4? Let's compute block rows1-2, cols3-4: Rows1 col3-4: Y Y Row2 col3-4: . . Block: Y Y / . . => contains Y and '.' . Output is W, which is not present. So rule not simple. Maybe transformation is overlay of four quadrants onto one quadrant: each quadrant of input (size 5x5) overlapped onto output (5x5) with hierarchy. Input 10x10 consists of four 5x5 quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. They are overlapped onto a single 5x5 output, with hierarchy: densest (heaviest) wins. The void '.' persists only where no gas in any quadrant. Thus we need to take each position (i,j) in 5x5 output, look at four corresponding cells from each quadrant: TL (i,j), TR (i, j+5), BL (i+5, j), BR (i+5, j+5). Choose according to hierarchy. Let's test with example1. Input 10x10. Let's extract quadrants. I'll label rows 1-10, cols 1-10. Top-left (TL) rows1-5 cols1-5. Rows1: . Y Y Y . Row2: Y Y . . . Row3: Y . . Y Y Row4: . . Y . Y Row5: . . Y Y Y Top-right (TR) rows1-5 cols6-10. Rows1 cols6-10: . . . . G G? Wait row1: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" columns: 1 .;2 Y;3 Y;4 Y;5 .;6 .;7 .;8 .;9 G;10 G. So TR rows1: cols6-10 = . . . G G? Actually col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 '.' col9 G col10 G => "...GG". Row2: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." => cols6-10: G . G G . => "G.GG." Row3: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." => cols6-10: . G G G . => ".GGG." Row4: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." => cols6-10: G . . G . => "G..G." Row5: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G" => cols6-10: G G G G G => "GGGGG". Bottom-left (BL) rows6-10 cols1-5. Rows6: ". W . W W" Row7: "W . . W W" Row8: ". . . W ." Row9: ". . W W ." Row10:"W W . W ." Bottom-right (BR) rows6-10 cols6-10. Rows6 cols6-10: ". . . A ." Row7: ". A A . A" Row ... [8952 chars truncated]
"Four currents carrying different colored dyes converge in a bay, and the strongest current's color always prevails."
120b: fail
See: A nautical chart divided into four sea quadrants, each streaked with a different colored current against still dark water.
Do: All currents pour into a shared bay. Where they meet, the most powerful current pushes its dye to the surface and drowns out weaker tints. One current is an unstoppable tide; another is so gentle it only colors water no other current touches.
Grid: The bay is one quadrant in size. Each patch of water shows the dye of the strongest current flowing through it, or remains dark and still where no current enters.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger (10x10?) Output grids are 5x5? Let's examine Example1: Input appears 10 rows, each 10 columns? Actually first line: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 entries. So 10x10 input. Output is 5x5. So transformation reduces size by factor 2? Possibly each 2x2 block maps to one output cell based on rule of "currents" mixing. The metaphor: four quadrants each with a colored current (different colored streaks) against dark water. All currents pour into a shared bay (one quadrant in size). Where they meet, the most powerful current pushes its dye to the surface and drowns out weaker tints. One current is unstoppable tide; another is gentle only colors water no other current touches. Interpretation: Input grid contains four colored "currents" each occupying a quadrant (maybe top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) with streaks (lines) of a specific color. The output is a 5x5 representing the "bay" where they converge? Possibly we overlay the four quadrants onto a central 5x5 region, taking the strongest color per cell. Let's analyze Example1 to deduce mapping. I'll label colors: Y=yellow, G=green, W=white? Actually W=maroon per key but treat as distinct. A=azure. Input 10x10. Let's split into quadrants of size 5x5 each? Top-left rows 0-4, cols0-4; top-right rows0-4, cols5-9; bottom-left rows5-9, cols0-4; bottom-right rows5-9, cols5-9. Let's extract each quadrant. I'll write rows with indices. Row0: . Y Y Y . . . . G G Indices0-9. Row1: Y Y . . . G . G G . Row2: Y . . Y Y . G G G . Row3: . . Y . Y G . . G . Row4: . . Y Y Y G G G G G Row5: . W . W W . . . A . Row6: W . . W W . A A . A Row7: . . . W . . . A A . Row8: . . W W . A . A . . Row9: W W . W . . A . A A Now quadrants: Top-left (rows0-4, cols0-4): Rows0 cols0-4: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y So TL contains Y and . only. Top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9): Rows0 cols5-9: . . . G G Row1: G . G G . Row2: . G G G . Row3: G . . G . Row4: G G G G G Colors: G and . maybe. Bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4): Rows5: . W . W W Row6: W . . W W Row7: . . . W . Row8: . . W W . Row9: W W . W . Colors: W and . maybe. Bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9): Rows5 cols5-9: . . . A . Row6: . A A . A Row7: . . A A . Row8: . A . A . . Row9: . A . A A Colors: A and . maybe. Thus each quadrant has a dominant color: TL=Y, TR=G, BL=W, BR=A. That matches metaphor: four currents each colored. Now output 5x5 grid: Output rows: . W Y G G G A G G W Y G G G Y G . W G Y G G G G G Let's see mapping: maybe each output cell corresponds to a position where the four currents intersect? Since each quadrant is 5x5, maybe we overlay them with some offset? The "bay" is one quadrant in size (5x5). The currents pour into shared bay: maybe we take each cell of output as combination of the four quadrants' cells at same relative position? For each position (i,j) within 5x5, we have four colors from each quadrant (TL, TR, BL, BR) at that ... [7888 chars truncated]
"Four signal buses share a common output line, but higher-priority signals always override lower ones."
120b: fail
See: A circuit board with four input quadrants, each carrying a different colored signal scattered among grounded (black) pins.
Do: All buses are multiplexed onto one output. At each pin, if multiple signals are active, the one with the highest priority wins the line. Priority is hardwired — one channel can never be overridden, while the lowest-priority channel only appears where no other signal is asserted.
Grid: The output bus is one quadrant in size. Each pin shows the highest-priority active signal, or stays grounded if no signal is present.
We need to infer rule. From description: four input quadrants each carrying different colored signal scattered among grounded (black) pins. Output quadrant size same as one quadrant. At each pin, highest priority active signal wins; lowest priority appears only where no other signal. Thus input grid is larger (maybe 10x10) composed of four quadrants (each 5x5). Each quadrant corresponds to a channel/color? In examples, output is 5x5 grid. Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Provided lines: looks 10 rows, each with 10 entries (space separated). Yes 10x10. Output 5x5. So quadrants: top-left (rows0-4, cols0-4) maybe channel1, top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9) channel2, bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4) channel3, bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9) channel4. Each quadrant contains colored signals (non-black) of various colors? Let's check Example1 input top-left quadrant (rows0-4, cols0-4): Rows0: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y Colors present: Y and maybe others? only Y and . So top-left channel is Y (yellow). top-right quadrant (rows0-4, cols5-9): Rows0 cols5-9: . . . . G G Row1: G . G G . Row2: . G G G . Row3: . . . . G . Row4: G G G G G Colors: G (green) and maybe . So channel2 is G. Bottom-left quadrant (rows5-9, cols0-4): Rows5: . W . W W Row6: W . . W W Row7: . . . W . Row8: . . . W . Row9: W W . W . Colors: W (maroon) and maybe . So channel3 is W. Bottom-right quadrant (rows5-9, cols5-9): Rows5: . . . A . Row6: A A . A Row7: . . A A . Row8: . A . A . Row9: . A . A A Colors: A (azure) and . So channel4 is A. Thus each quadrant has a distinct color (Y,G,W,A). Output 5x5 shows mixture of these colors based on priority. Need to deduce priority order. Output example1 grid: Row0: . W Y G G Row1: G A G G W Row2: Y G G G Y Row3: G . W G Y Row4: G G G G G We need to see at each position (i,j) (0-4) the highest priority among the four quadrants' signals at that coordinate (i,j). Since each quadrant provides a signal at its own coordinate (i,j) within its 5x5 area. So we need to overlay them. Thus for each (i,j), we have four possible colors: from TL quadrant at (i,j), from TR quadrant at (i,j), from BL quadrant at (i,j), from BR quadrant at (i,j). Some may be '.' (ground). The output picks highest priority among non-'.' according to some ordering. We need to infer ordering from example. Let's compute for a few positions. Create matrices: TL (Y): 0: . Y Y Y . 1: Y Y . . . 2: Y . . Y Y 3: . . Y . Y 4: . . Y Y Y TR (G): 0: . . . . G G (col5-9) but need 5 columns: indices 0-4 correspond to cols5-9. Row0: . . . . G G? Wait there are 5 columns: from input row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G". So after first 5 entries (0-4) we have entries 5-9: ". . . . G G". That's 5? Actually that's 5 entries: positions 5 '.' 6 '.' 7 '.' 8 'G' 9 'G'. So row0 TR: . . . G G? Wait we have 5 entries: col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 'G' col9 'G' => . . . G G. Row1 input: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." first 5: Y Y . . . ; last 5: G . G G . =&g ... [10153 chars truncated]
"Four gods paint their colors across a shared canvas, but divine rank determines whose mark endures."
120b: k=3
See: A celestial tablet divided into four divine domains, each bearing the sigil of a different god in colored marks against a dark void.
Do: The gods merge their domains onto one tablet. Where sigils overlap, the higher-ranking deity's mark obliterates the lesser. The supreme god's color is inviolable; the humblest deity's mark persists only in spaces no other god has claimed.
Grid: The merged tablet is one domain in size. Each cell bears the sigil of the highest-ranking god who marked it, or void where none staked a claim.
We need to infer rule. The description: four divine domains each bearing sigil of different god in colored marks against dark void. Gods merge domains onto one tablet. Where sigils overlap, higher-ranking deity's mark obliterates lesser. Supreme god's color inviolable; humblest deity's mark persists only in spaces no other god has claimed. Thus input likely contains four quadrants? The examples: Input grids are 10x10? Example1 input appears 10 rows each with 10 entries (including spaces). Output is 5x5. So merging reduces size: each domain maybe 5x5 quadrant? The input likely contains four 5x5 quadrants placed in a 10x10 grid (2x2). Each quadrant corresponds to a god's domain with its own color marks. When merging, we overlay them onto a single 5x5 grid, with priority ranking among gods. Thus we need to split input into four 5x5 blocks: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Then combine per priority order. We need to deduce ranking order from examples. Colors: Y, G, W, A etc. In example1 output includes colors . W Y G G etc. Let's attempt to reconstruct. Example1 input: 10x10. Let's label quadrants size 5. TL rows1-5 cols1-5, TR rows1-5 cols6-10, BL rows6-10 cols1-5, BR rows6-10 cols6-10. Let's extract TL (rows1-5, cols1-5): Row1: . Y Y Y . Row2: Y Y . . . Row3: Y . . Y Y Row4: . . Y . Y Row5: . . Y Y Y So TL contains . and Y only. So god1 maybe Y (yellow) domain. TR (rows1-5, cols6-10): Row1 cols6-10: . . . . G G? Wait row1 has "... G G" after first 5? Row1: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 entries. So cols6-10 are ". . . G G". Actually positions: col6 '.', col7 '.', col8 '.', col9 'G', col10 'G'. So TR contains . and G. BL (rows6-10, cols1-5): Rows6-10: Row6: ". W . W W" Row7: "W . . W W" Row8: ". . . W ." Row9: ". . W W ." Row10:"W W . W ." So BL contains W and . maybe also? So god2 maybe W (maroon). BR (rows6-10, cols6-10): Rows6: ". . . A ." Row7: "A A . A" Row8: ". . A A ." Row9: "A . A . ." Row10:". A A A A" So BR contains A and . (azure). So god3 maybe A. Thus we have three colors Y, G, W, A across quadrants. Output 5x5 includes . W Y G G etc. So merging rule: For each cell position (i,j) within 5x5, we have up to four marks from each quadrant (maybe each quadrant provides a color at that position). The highest ranking deity's color appears. We need ranking order. Let's compute for each position combine. Take position (1,1) (row1 col1 of 5x5). TL has '.'; TR has from row1 col6? Actually position (1,1) corresponds to TL row1 col1 '.'; TR row1 col6 '.'; BL row6 col1 '.'; BR row6 col6 '.'? Wait row6 col6 is '.' (since row6: ". W . W W . . . A . A"? Actually row6 of input: ". W . W W . . . A . A"? Let's re-evaluate row6: from example1 input row6: ". W . W W . . . A .". That's 10 entries: col1 '.', col2 'W', col3 '.', col4 'W', col5 'W', col6 '.', col7 '.', col8 '.', col9 'A', col10 '.'. So BR row6 col6 '.'. Thus all four are '.' -> output at (1,1) is '.' according to output? Output row1 col1 is '.' yes. Now positio ... [8077 chars truncated]
"Four dance troupes in different costumes perform on a shrinking stage — when dancers collide, the lead company holds its ground."
120b: k=6
See: A rehearsal hall quartered into four zones, each occupied by dancers in a different colored costume scattered among empty floor spaces.
Do: All troupes are called to perform on a single shared stage. When dancers from different companies land on the same mark, the troupe with the higher billing takes the spot. The principal company is never displaced; the understudy troupe only fills marks no other dancer wants.
Grid: The shared stage is one zone in size. Each mark shows the costume color of the highest-billed dancer present, or empty floor where no one stands.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input is larger grid (10x10?) Output is smaller (5x5). Seems they compress quadrants? The description: rehearsal hall quartered into four zones, each occupied by dancers in different colored costume scattered among empty floor spaces. All troupes called to perform on a single shared stage. When dancers from different companies land on same mark, higher billing takes spot. Principal company never displaced; understudy only fills marks no other dancer wants. Shared stage is one zone in size. Each mark shows costume color of highest-billed dancer present, or empty floor where no one stands. Interpretation: Input grid is 10x10 divided into four quadrants (each 5x5). Each quadrant corresponds to a "company" (color set). Output is a 5x5 grid representing the result of overlaying the four quadrants onto each other, with priority ordering among companies. Need to determine priority order: "principal company is never displaced; the understudy troupe only fills marks no other dancer wants." So there is a hierarchy: maybe order: W (maroon) > Y > G > A? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input 10x10. Let's split into quadrants: top-left (rows0-4, cols0-4), top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9), bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4), bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9). Output 5x5. We need to compute overlay: For each position (i,j) in 5x5 output, we consider four cells: TL[i][j], TR[i][j], BL[i][j], BR[i][j]. Choose according to priority. Let's test with Example1. I'll write TL (5x5): Rows0-4, cols0-4: Row0: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y TR (rows0-4, cols5-9): Row0 cols5-9: . . . . G G? Wait row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" length 10. indices 0-9. So cols5-9 are positions 5,6,7,8,9: . . . . G G? Actually there are 10 entries: let's list row0: [0].,1 Y,2 Y,3 Y,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 G,9 G. So TR row0 = cols5-9 = . . . G G? Wait col5 is ., col6 ., col7 ., col8 G, col9 G => ". . . G G". Good. Row1: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." => cols5-9: G . G G . => "G . G G ." Row2: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." => cols5-9: . G G G . => ". G G G ." Row3: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." => cols5-9: G . . G . => "G . . G ." Row4: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G" => cols5-9: G G G G G => "G G G G G" Now BL (rows5-9, cols0-4): Rows5: ". W . W W . . . A ." => cols0-4: . W . W W Row6: "W . . W W . A A . A" => cols0-4: W . . W W Row7: ". . . W . . . A A ." => cols0-4: . . . W . Row8: ". . W W . A . A . ." => cols0-4: . . W W . Row9: "W W . W . . A . A A" => cols0-4: W W . W . BR (rows5-9, cols5-9): Row5 cols5-9: . . . A . => ". . . A ." Row6: ". A A . A" => ". A A . A" Row7: ". . A A ." => ". . A A ." Row8: "A . A . ." => "A . A . ." Row9: ". A . A A" => ". A . A A" Now output grid (5x5) given: Row0: . W Y G G Row1: G A G G W Row2: Y G G G Y Row3: G . W G Y Row4: G G G G G Now we need to see rule: For each position (i,j), we have four candidates: TL, TR, BL, BR. Choose based on priority or ... [7937 chars truncated]
"Four mineral veins intersect in a cross-section, and at every point the hardest mineral displaces the softer ones."
120b: fail
See: A rock face quartered into four strata, each shot through with a different colored mineral vein against dark empty matrix.
Do: The strata are compressed into a single cross-section. Where veins intersect, the mineral with the greater hardness always fills the space. Diamond-hard veins are never displaced; the softest mineral only fills voids left by all the rest.
Grid: The compressed section is one stratum in size. Each point shows the hardest mineral present, or empty matrix where no vein runs.
We need to infer rule. The description: rock face quartered into four strata, each shot through with a different colored mineral vein against dark empty matrix. Strata compressed into a single cross-section. Where veins intersect, the mineral with greater hardness fills the space. Diamond-hard veins never displaced; softest mineral only fills voids left by all the rest. So we have four quadrants each with a color vein? Input grid seems larger (10x10). Output smaller (5x5). So compression: each quadrant (size maybe 5x5) compressed into one cell? Actually input 10x10, output 5x5. So each 2x2 block corresponds to one output cell? Let's test with example1. Example1 input 10x10, output 5x5. Let's map first 2 rows and columns? Let's write input1 grid (I'll index). Input1 rows: 1: . Y Y Y . . . . G G 2: Y Y . . . G . G G . 3: Y . . Y Y . G G G . 4: . . Y . Y G . . G . 5: . . Y Y Y G G G G G 6: . W . W W . . . A . 7: W . . W W . A A . A 8: . . . W . . . A A . 9: . . . W . A . A . . 10: W W . W . . A . A A Output1 5x5: row1: . W Y G G row2: G A G G W row3: Y G G G Y row4: G . W G Y row5: G G G G G We need to see mapping. Let's divide input into four quadrants? Since description: rock face quartered into four strata. So maybe each quadrant (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) corresponds to a "stratum". Each stratum has its own vein color (maybe Y, G, W, A?). In example1, top-left quadrant (rows1-5, cols1-5) contains Y and . and maybe other colors? Let's extract TL 5x5: Rows1-5, Col1-5: r1: . Y Y Y . r2: Y Y . . . r3: Y . . Y Y r4: . . Y . Y r5: . . Y Y Y Colors present: Y and . (black). So vein color Y. Top-right quadrant (rows1-5, cols6-10): Rows1-5, cols6-10: r1: . . . . G G (col6-10: . . . . G G) actually row1 col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 '.' col9 G col10 G r2: G . G G . (col6 G,7 .,8 G,9 G,10 .) r3: . G G G . (col6 .,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 .) r4: G . . G . (col6 G,7 .,8 .,9 G,10 .) r5: G G G G G (col6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G) Colors: G and . So vein G. Bottom-left quadrant (rows6-10, cols1-5): Rows6-10, cols1-5: r6: . W . W W r7: W . . W W r8: . . . W . r9: . . . W . r10: W W . W . Colors: W and . So vein W. Bottom-right quadrant (rows6-10, cols6-10): Rows6-10, cols6-10: r6: . . . A . r7: . A A . A r8: . . A A . r9: . A . . . r10: . A A . A Colors: A and . So vein A. Thus each quadrant has a primary vein color (Y,G,W,A). Output grid shows mixture of these colors based on intersections? Output size 5x5 corresponds to each row/col representing a "compressed" stratum? Actually output 5x5 maybe each cell corresponds to a position across the four quadrants overlapped? The compression "single cross-section" maybe we overlay the four quadrants onto each other (like stacking) and for each position (i,j) we consider the four cells from each quadrant at that same relative position (i,j) within quadrant, and choose the hardest mineral present (hardness ranking). Hardness order: Diamond-hard veins never displaced (hardest). Softest only fills voids left by ... [9084 chars truncated]
"Four spices are layered onto a single flatbread, but the bolder flavors always overpower the subtle ones."
120b: fail
See: A large cutting board sectioned into four quadrants, each dusted with a different colored spice over bare dough.
Do: Fold the flatbread so all four quadrants stack into one. Where multiple spices overlap, only the most pungent one can be tasted. The others vanish beneath it. One spice dominates everything; another is so mild it only registers where the bread was otherwise plain.
Grid: The folded bread is a quarter of the original size. Each bite reveals only the strongest spice present at that spot, or bare dough if no spice reached there.
We need to infer rule. The description: folding quadrants onto each other, taking most pungent (dominant) spice where overlap. One spice dominates everything; another is mild only registers where bread otherwise plain. So we have 4 quadrants of input grid (original size). Output is quarter size (folded). For each position in output, we consider the 4 corresponding cells from each quadrant (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right) that map onto that spot after folding. Then we choose the "most pungent" (dominant) color among them, according to some hierarchy. Also there is a "mild" that only appears where no other spice (i.e., only if all are blank?). Let's deduce hierarchy from examples.
First, need to know dimensions. Example1 input appears 10 rows? Let's count: lines: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 columns. There are 10 rows. Output is 5x5. So indeed quarter size (fold both dimensions by 2). So folding halves rows and columns: top-left quadrant (rows 0-4, cols0-4), top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9), bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4), bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9). Then for each output cell (i,j) (0-index), we take four cells: TL[i][j], TR[i][j], BL[i][j], BR[i][j] (where TR uses column offset +5, etc). Then choose according to hierarchy.
Now need hierarchy. Let's list colors present: . (black), Y, G, W, A, maybe others. In example1 output grid 5x5 includes . , W, Y, G, A. No other colors. So hierarchy among Y, G, W, A, . . Determine by looking at each output cell and its four inputs.
Let's compute for example1 first cell (0,0) output '.' . Input quadrants: TL (row0 col0) = '.' ; TR (row0 col5) = '.'? row0 col5 is '.' (since row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G": indices 0 '.' 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 '.' 5 '.' 6 '.' 7 '.' 8 G 9 G). So TR cell '.' . BL (row5 col0) = 'W' (row5: ". W . W W . . . A .": col0 '.'? Wait row5 is ". W . W W . . . A .": col0 '.' . Actually row5 col0 '.' . So BL '.' . BR (row5 col5) = '.'? row5 col5 is '.' (since indices: 0 '.' 1 W 2 '.' 3 W 4 W 5 '.' 6 '.' 7 '.' 8 A 9 '.'). So all four are '.' -> output '.' matches.
Second cell (0,1) output 'W'. Let's compute: TL row0 col1 = Y. TR row0 col6 = '.' (col6). BL row5 col1 = W. BR row5 col6 = '.' . So set {Y, W}. Output is W, meaning W dominates over Y. So hierarchy: W > Y.
Third cell (0,2) output 'Y'. TL row0 col2 = Y. TR row0 col7 = '.' . BL row5 col2 = '.' . BR row5 col7 = '.' . So only Y present -> Y.
Fourth cell (0,3) output 'G'. TL row0 col3 = Y. TR row0 col8 = G. BL row5 col3 = W. BR row5 col8 = A. So set {Y,G,W,A}. Output G. So G dominates over Y,W,A. So hierarchy: G > others (maybe top). Let's see.
Fifth cell (0,4) output 'G'. TL row0 col4 = '.' . TR row0 col9 = G. BL row5 col4 = W. BR row5 col9 = '.' . So set {G,W}. Output G, so G > W.
Now row1 col0 output G. Input: TL row1 col0 = Y. TR row1 col5 = G? row1: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." indices: 0 Y 1 Y 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 G 6 . 7 G 8 G 9 . . So TR col5 = G. BL row6 col0 = W? row6: "W . . W W . A A . A": col0 W. BR row6 col5 =
... [7522 chars truncated]
"Four instruments play the same passage simultaneously, but louder instruments mask the quieter ones at every beat."
120b: k=1
See: A score divided into four parts, each written for a different instrument in its own colored ink against silent rests.
Do: All four parts are performed together. At each beat, only the loudest instrument playing at that moment is heard. The brass drowns out the strings, the strings cover the woodwinds, and so on down the chain. Silence only persists where every part rests.
Grid: The listener hears a single condensed passage where each beat carries only the one instrument that rang loudest, or silence where none played.
We need to infer rule. The metaphor: four parts each instrument colored ink. At each beat, only loudest instrument (priority order) is heard. Brass drowns strings, strings cover woodwinds, etc. So there is hierarchy of colors. Need to map input grid (multiple layers?) Actually input grid is a single grid with many colors. Perhaps each color corresponds to instrument part. The four parts are maybe quadrants? Or four separate layers encoded by colors? The output is smaller grid (condensed). In example, input is 10x10? Let's count: Example1 input lines: first line ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 columns. There are 10 rows. Output is 5x5. So transformation reduces size by factor 2? Possibly each 2x2 block corresponds to a beat, and we pick the highest priority color present among the four parts (maybe each part is a quarter of the original grid). But output 5x5 suggests each output cell corresponds to a 2x2 region of input (since 10/5=2). So rule: For each 2x2 block, choose the color with highest priority according to hierarchy. Need to deduce hierarchy from example. Let's compute for a few blocks to infer mapping. I'll label colors: . black (silence), Y yellow, G green, W maroon, A azure, etc. We need priority order: brass > strings > woodwinds > ... Not given mapping. But we can infer from example. Take top-left 2x2 block of input (rows1-2, cols1-2): Rows: 1: . Y 2: Y Y So colors present: . , Y. Output top-left cell (row1 col1) is '.' according to output? Let's see output grid first row: ". W Y G G". So first cell is '.' indeed. So among . and Y, '.' chosen, meaning '.' has higher priority than Y? That seems odd; maybe '.' is silence, but rule says silence only where every part rests (i.e., all are .). But here not all . So maybe we misinterpret block mapping. Maybe each of four parts are separate quadrants of the whole grid (like four instruments each occupying a quarter of the grid). Then we overlay them with priority. The output size same as each part (maybe 5x5). Indeed input 10x10 could be composed of four 5x5 quadrants: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right each representing a part. Then we overlay them to produce final 5x5 grid, picking highest priority per cell. Let's test: Partition input into four 5x5 quadrants: rows 1-5, cols1-5 = top-left; rows1-5, cols6-10 = top-right; rows6-10, cols1-5 = bottom-left; rows6-10, cols6-10 = bottom-right. Now output is 5x5. For each position (i,j) we have four colors (one from each quadrant). Choose according to hierarchy. Let's compute for position (1,1): top-left quadrant cell (row1 col1) = '.' ; top-right quadrant cell (row1 col6) = '.' (since row1 col6 is '.'), bottom-left quadrant cell (row6 col1) = '.'? row6 is ". W . W W . . . A ." Wait row6 col1 = '.' . bottom-right quadrant cell (row6 col6) = '.'? row6 col6 is '.' (since row6 col6 is '.' ), so all '.' => output '.' matches. Position (1,2): top-left (row1 col2) = Y ; top-right (row1 col7) = '.' ; bottom-left (row6 col ... [8388 chars truncated]
"Four teams draft players onto a shared field, but when two claim the same position, rank decides who plays."
120b: fail
See: A stadium split into four practice zones, each occupied by a different team's colored jerseys scattered among empty spots.
Do: All teams merge onto one field. When multiple players want the same position, the higher-seeded team's player takes it. The top seed never yields; the bottom seed only fills unclaimed gaps.
Grid: The merged field is a single zone the size of each practice area. Each position shows the jersey of whichever team had the highest rank among those claiming it.
We need to infer rule. The description: stadium split into four practice zones, each occupied by a different team's colored jerseys scattered among empty spots. Merge onto one field. When multiple players want same position, higher-seeded team's player takes it. Top seed never yields; bottom seed only fills unclaimed gaps. Merged field is a single zone the size of each practice area. Each position shows jersey of highest rank among those claiming it. Interpretation: Input grid is larger, composed of four quadrants (practice zones). Each quadrant corresponds to a team (color). They are merged into a smaller grid equal to size of each quadrant (so each quadrant size maybe N x M). The output grid is of that size, each cell is determined by taking the corresponding cells from each quadrant and selecting according to priority ranking of colors (seed). Need to deduce ordering of colors (seed ranking). From examples. First, need to determine quadrant layout. Input examples appear to be 10x10? Example1 input lines: looks 10 columns each row? Let's count: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 entries. There are 10 rows. So 10x10 grid. Output is 5x5 grid. So each quadrant is 5x5. So the input is composed of four 5x5 quadrants arranged in 2x2: top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right. Output is 5x5 merging them. Thus rule: For each position (i,j) within quadrant size, we have four cells: TL(i,j), TR(i,j), BL(i,j), BR(i,j). Choose color based on priority ranking of colors (teams). The top seed never yields (i.e., highest priority always wins). Bottom seed only fills unclaimed gaps (i.e., lowest priority only used if others are empty '.' maybe). So we need ranking order. Let's deduce ranking from examples. Example1: Input quadrants? Let's split 10x10 into 5x5 quadrants. I'll label rows 0-9, cols 0-9. I'll write TL (rows0-4, cols0-4), TR (rows0-4, cols5-9), BL (rows5-9, cols0-4), BR (rows5-9, cols5-9). Let's extract TL from example1 input: Rows0-4, cols0-4: Row0: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y So TL matrix: [.,Y,Y,Y,.] [Y,Y,.,.,.] [Y,.,.,Y,Y] [.,.,Y,.,Y] [.,.,Y,Y,Y] TR (rows0-4, cols5-9): Row0 cols5-9: . . . . G G -> actually row0 entries after col5: positions 5-9: . . . . G G? Wait there are 10 columns total, indices 0-9. Row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G". So col0='.',1='Y',2='Y',3='Y',4='.',5='.',6='.',7='.',8='G',9='G'. So TR rows0-4, cols5-9: Row0: . . . G G (col5='.',6='.',7='.',8='G',9='G') Row1: . G . G G .? Wait row1: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." that's 10 entries: col0 Y,1 Y,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 G,6 .,7 G,8 G,9 . . So TR row1 cols5-9: G . G G . Row2: ". . G G G ." row2: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." Actually row2: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." So cols5-9: . G G G . Row3: ". Y G . . G ?" row3: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." => cols5-9: G . . G . Row4: ". . G G G G G G G G"? row4: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G". cols5-9: G G G G G Thus TR matrix 5x5: Row0: . . . G G Row1: G . G G . Row2: . G G G . Row3: G . . G . Row4: G G G G G BL (rows5-9, co ... [8360 chars truncated]
"Four weather fronts converge on the same region, but the most severe system always dictates local conditions."
120b: k=2
See: A weather map quartered into four zones, each showing a different colored atmospheric pattern against calm black skies.
Do: The fronts collide over a single region. Where multiple systems overlap, the most violent one determines the weather. A hurricane overwrites a thunderstorm, which overwrites drizzle, which overwrites a light breeze. Clear skies remain only where no front reaches.
Grid: The forecast region is one quarter the map's area. Each cell shows the color of the most severe weather system present, or clear skies if untouched.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger than output; output seems quarter size? In example1 input size? Let's count rows: Input lines appear 11 rows? Actually example1 input lines: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" (10 columns) "Y Y . . . G . G G ." (10) "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." (10) ". . Y . Y G . . G ." (10) ". . Y Y Y G G G G G" (10) ". W . W W . . . A ." (10) "W . . W W . A A . A" (10) ". . . W . . . A A ." (10) ". . W W . A . A . ." (10) "W W . W . . A . A A" (10) So 10x10 input. Output is 5x5. So quarter area (half rows, half cols). Likely we partition input into 2x2 blocks and combine according to hierarchy: hurricane overwrites thunderstorm etc. Colors correspond to severity order? Need mapping: In description: hurricane > thunderstorm > drizzle > light breeze > clear. Colors correspond? Probably: red? Not sure. Look at example: Input contains colors Y, G, W, A etc. Output contains Y, G, W, A. So rule picks most severe among the 2x2 block? Let's test: Take top-left 2x2 block of example1 input: Rows1-2 cols1-2: . Y Y Y So colors: . (black), Y, Y, Y. Output top-left cell is '.'? Actually output first row first column is '.' (from output grid). So most severe among those is Y? But output is '.' meaning maybe we take something else like majority? Let's compute: maybe we overlay quadrants: The input is quartered into four zones each showing different colored pattern against black. The fronts collide over a single region. Where multiple systems overlap, the most violent one determines the weather. A hurricane overwrites a thunderstorm, which overwrites drizzle, which overwrites a light breeze. Clear skies remain only where no front reaches. Thus each quadrant is a "front" of a certain color (severity). They overlap in central region (the quarter area). The output is that central region showing the most severe color per cell after overlay of four quadrants. So input is 10x10, each quadrant maybe 5x5? The quadrants are placed in corners? Let's examine example1 input: top-left quadrant (rows0-4, cols0-4) seems to have Y and . etc. top-right quadrant (rows0-4, cols5-9) has G etc. bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4) has W and . etc. bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9) has A etc. So each quadrant is a pattern of its color (Y, G, W, A). Output 5x5 likely corresponds to overlapping region where all four quadrants intersect? That would be the central 5x5 region where they overlap? But quadrants are non-overlapping; they are separate corners. How do they overlap? Perhaps they are "folded" onto each other: each quadrant is overlaid onto the central region by mirroring? For example, top-left quadrant is reflected onto output? Let's test: Output first row: ". W Y G G". Compare with top-left quadrant rows? Top-left quadrant rows0-4 cols0-4: Row0: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y If we rotate 180? Not matching. Maybe the rule: For each position (i,j) in output (size N/2), we take the four cells from input a ... [7547 chars truncated]
"Four translucent blueprints are stacked, but some inks bleed through and obscure the layers beneath."
120b: k=1
See: A drafting table with four separate blueprint quadrants, each drawn in a different colored ink on transparent vellum, with unmarked areas left clear.
Do: Stack all four sheets into one view. Where multiple inks align, the most opaque ink dominates and hides the rest. One ink is completely opaque; another is nearly transparent, visible only where no other ink overlaps.
Grid: The composite view is a single sheet the size of each quadrant. Each cell shows the most opaque ink present, or remains blank where all sheets are clear.
We need to infer rule. The description: four quadrants each drawn in different colored ink on transparent vellum, stack them, most opaque dominates, one ink completely opaque; another nearly transparent visible only where no other ink overlaps. So we have four layers? Input grid maybe contains four quadrants? In example, input is 10x10? Actually example input shows 10 rows each with 10 entries? Let's count first row: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 columns. So 10x10 grid. Output is 5x5 grid. So transformation reduces size by half? Possibly each quadrant is 5x5, stacked to produce 5x5 output. The four quadrants are top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right each 5x5. Each quadrant uses a distinct color (ink) and maybe blank cells are transparent. When stacking, the most opaque ink dominates. One ink is completely opaque (covers any below), another is nearly transparent (only visible where no other ink overlaps). So we need to determine which quadrant corresponds to which opacity order. Given input 10x10, we can split into four 5x5 quadrants: Rows 0-4, cols 0-4 = top-left (TL) Rows 0-4, cols 5-9 = top-right (TR) Rows 5-9, cols 0-4 = bottom-left (BL) Rows 5-9, cols 5-9 = bottom-right (BR) Now each quadrant contains colors (Y,G,W,A etc). The output 5x5 shows final visible color per cell after stacking. We need to deduce stacking order and opacity levels. Let's extract example 1 data. I'll label TL matrix (5x5): Rows0-4, cols0-4: Row0: . Y Y Y . Row1: Y Y . . . Row2: Y . . Y Y Row3: . . Y . Y Row4: . . Y Y Y TR matrix (rows0-4, cols5-9): Row0 cols5-9: . . . . G G -> actually columns 5-9 (indices 5-9) values: col5 '.'? Wait row0: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" indices:0 '.' 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 G 9 G. So TR row0: cols5-9 = . . . G G? Wait col5 is '.' col6 '.' col7 '.' col8 G col9 G => ". . . G G" Row1: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." => cols5-9: G . G G . => "G . G G ." Row2: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." => cols5-9: . G G G . => ". G G G ." Row3: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." => cols5-9: G . . G . => "G . . G ." Row4: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G" => cols5-9: G G G G G => "G G G G G" BL matrix rows5-9, cols0-4: Row5: ". W . W W . . . A ." => cols0-4: . W . W W Row6: "W . . W W . A A . A" => cols0-4: W . . W W Row7: ". . . W . . . A A ." => cols0-4: . . . W . Row8: ". . W W . A . A . ." => cols0-4: . . W W . Row9: "W W . W . . A . A A" => cols0-4: W W . W . BR matrix rows5-9, cols5-9: Row5 cols5-9: . . . A . => ". . . A ." Row6: ". A A . A" => from row6: "W . . W W . A A . A": cols5 '.' col6 A col7 A col8 . col9 A => ". A A . A" Row7: ". . A A ." => row7: ". . . W . . . A A .": cols5 '.' col6 . col7 A col8 A col9 . => ". . A A ." Row8: "A . . . ." => row8: ". . W W . A . A . .": cols5 A col6 . col7 A col8 . col9 . => "A . A . ."? Wait need check: row8 values: indices:0 '.'1 '.'2 W3 W4 .5 A6 .7 A8 .9 . So cols5-9: A . A . . => "A . A . ." Row9: ". A . A A" => row9: "W W . W . . A . A A": cols5 '.' col6 ... [8485 chars truncated]
"Four armies converge on a contested map, and at every stronghold the mightiest force claims the banner."
120b: fail
See: A war table divided into four theaters, each showing a different army's colored banners planted among unoccupied black terrain.
Do: All armies advance onto shared ground. Where forces meet, the stronger army seizes the position. There is a strict chain of command among the four — the imperial guard never falls, the militia only holds ground no one else wanted.
Grid: The contested ground is one theater in size. Each position flies the banner of the strongest army present, or lies empty if none advanced there.
We need to infer rule from examples. Input grids are larger (10x10?) Output grids are 5x5? Let's examine Example1: Input appears 10 rows each with 10 columns? Let's count first line: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10 entries. Yes 10x10. Output is 5x5. So transformation reduces size by factor 2? Possibly each 2x2 block maps to one cell based on rule: "contested ground is one theater in size" maybe each quadrant? The description: war table divided into four theaters, each showing a different army's colored banners planted among unoccupied black terrain. All armies advance onto shared ground. Where forces meet, the stronger army seizes the position. There is a strict chain of command among the four — the imperial guard never falls, the militia only holds ground no one else wanted. So four armies correspond to four colors? Which colors? In key: maybe B=blue, R=red, G=green, Y=yellow, etc. But examples use colors Y, G, W, A. So maybe four armies are Y, G, W, A? In example1 input includes Y, G, W, A plus black '.' . Output includes Y, G, W, A plus '.' maybe. So each 2x2 block contains some of these colors; rule picks strongest according to hierarchy: imperial guard never falls (maybe highest rank), militia only holds ground no one else wanted (lowest). Need hierarchy order among colors. Let's deduce from example. Take Example1 input first 2 rows, first 2 columns block: Rows1-2, Col1-2: Row1: . Y Row2: Y Y So block contains Y and '.' . Output cell (row1 col1) is '.' according to output? Let's see output grid first row: ". W Y G G". So first cell is '.' . So Y lost to '.'? That seems odd. Maybe '.' is empty, and if no army advances there (i.e., no color present) output '.' . But there is Y present. So maybe rule is not per 2x2 block. Maybe the transformation extracts the "contested ground" which is one theater in size (maybe central 5x5 region) where armies overlap after advancing? Could be that each army occupies its own quadrant initially (top-left Y, top-right G, bottom-left W, bottom-right A). Then they all advance onto shared ground (the central 5x5). Overlap resolved by hierarchy. So output is central 5x5 region after merging. Let's test: In Example1 input, we need to locate quadrants: maybe each theater is 5x5? Input 10x10, divided into four 5x5 quadrants: top-left (rows0-4, cols0-4), top-right (rows0-4, cols5-9), bottom-left (rows5-9, cols0-4), bottom-right (rows5-9, cols5-9). Each quadrant contains one army's colors plus '.' . Indeed top-left appears Y and '.' . top-right appears G and '.' . bottom-left appears W and '.' . bottom-right appears A and '.' . Let's verify: Example1 top-left quadrant rows0-4 cols0-4: rows: 0: . Y Y Y . 1: Y Y . . . 2: Y . . Y Y 3: . . Y . Y 4: . . Y Y Y These contain Y and '.' only. Good. Top-right quadrant rows0-4 cols5-9: Row0 cols5-9: . . . G G Row1: . G . G G . Row2: . . G G G . Row3: . Y G . . G . Row4: G G G G G Contains G, Y maybe? Actually there is Y at row3 col6? Wait row3 col6 is G? Let's map: row3 ... [10448 chars truncated]
"Four spotlight operators aim colored gels at the same stage, but brighter lights wash out the dimmer ones."
120b: k=1
See: A theater rigged with four lighting zones, each casting a different colored light in scattered patterns against a dark stage.
Do: All spotlights converge on a single stage area. Where beams overlap, the brightest light defines the color seen. The most powerful lamp always dominates; the dimmest only tints the stage where no other light falls.
Grid: The illuminated stage is one zone in size. Each spot shows the color of the brightest beam hitting it, or darkness where no light reaches.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid larger (10x10?) Output is 5x5. So transformation reduces size: maybe each 2x2 block? Let's examine. Example1 Input: 10 rows, each 10 columns? Let's count first row: ". Y Y Y . . . . G G" that's 10. Output 5x5. So likely each 2x2 block maps to a single cell based on "brightest light dominates". Colors have hierarchy: most powerful lamp always dominates; dimmest only tints where no other light falls. Need ordering of colors. Probably hierarchy: W (maroon) > A (azure) > G > Y > ... Not sure. Let's compute mapping: For each 2x2 block of input, we need to decide output color based on brightest among cells that are not '.'? Also '.' is black (dark). The "brightest" maybe defined by some ordering given by metaphor: "most powerful lamp always dominates; the dimmest only tints the stage where no other light falls." So there is ranking of colors. We need to deduce ranking from example. Let's list 2x2 blocks and output. Input grid rows 1-10, cols1-10. I'll index. Row1: col1 '.';2 Y;3 Y;4 Y;5 .;6 .;7 .;8 .;9 G;10 G Row2: "Y Y . . . G . G G ." (col1 Y,2 Y,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 G,7 .,8 G,9 G,10 .) Row3: "Y . . Y Y . G G G ." (col1 Y,2 .,3 .,4 Y,5 Y,6 .,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 .) Row4: ". . Y . Y G . . G ." (col1 .,2 .,3 Y,4 .,5 Y,6 G,7 .,8 .,9 G,10 .) Row5: ". . Y Y Y G G G G G (col1 .,2 .,3 Y,4 Y,5 Y,6 G,7 G,8 G,9 G,10 G) Row6: ". W . W W . . . A ." (col1 .,2 W,3 .,4 W,5 W,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 A,10 .) Row7: "W . . W W . A A . A" (col1 W,2 .,3 .,4 W,5 W,6 .,7 A,8 A,9 .,10 A) Row8: ". . . W . . . A A ." (col1 .,2 .,3 .,4 W,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 A,9 A,10 .) Row9: ". . W W . A . A . ." (col1 .,2 .,3 W,4 W,5 .,6 A,7 .,8 A,9 .,10 .) Row10:"W W . W . . A . A A" (col1 W,2 W,3 .,4 W,5 .,6 .,7 A,8 .,9 A,10 A) Now output 5x5 rows: Row1: ". W Y G G" Row2: "G A G G W" Row3: "Y G G G Y" Row4: "G . W G Y" Row5: "G G G G G" So each output cell corresponds to 2x2 block: block (rows 1-2, cols1-2) => output (1,1) = '.' . Let's compute block rows1-2 cols1-2: [ (1,1) '.' , (1,2) Y ; (2,1) Y ; (2,2) Y ] => colors: Y,Y,Y plus '.' . Output '.' meaning maybe black if there is no "brightest"? But there are Y's. So maybe rule not simple 2x2. Maybe they take 2x2 but also consider overlapping? Or maybe they take 2x2 but choose the "least bright" (dim) where no brighter present? But Y present, output '.' contradicts. Let's examine other block: output (1,2) = W corresponds to rows1-2 cols3-4? Actually columns 3-4? Let's map: output grid 5x5 each cell corresponds to 2x2 region: output (i,j) corresponds to input rows (2i-1,2i) and cols (2j-1,2j). So (1,2) uses rows1-2, cols3-4. Rows1-2 cols3-4: row1 col3 Y, col4 Y; row2 col3 ., col4 . => colors Y,Y plus '.' . Output W, not Y. So not. Maybe they are doing some kind of convolution where each output cell is the most frequent color among a 3x3? Not. Let's compute output (5,5) = G corresponds to rows9-10 cols9-10: rows9 col9 ., col10 . ; row10 col9 A, col10 A => colors A,A plus '.' . Output G ... [9090 chars truncated]
"Four gardeners plant different flowers in overlapping beds, but the most aggressive species always chokes out the rest."
120b: fail
See: A garden plot quartered into four beds, each planted with a different colored flower species among bare soil patches.
Do: The beds are merged into one. Where roots compete, the most invasive species claims the ground. One flower spreads so aggressively nothing can displace it; the gentlest bloom only survives where the soil is otherwise untended.
Grid: The merged bed is one quarter of the original plot. Each patch shows whichever flower outgrew the competition, or bare soil where nothing was planted.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example1 input appears 10 rows? Let's count: lines given:
". Y Y Y . . . . G G" (10 columns)
"Y Y . . . G . G G ." (10)
"Y . . Y Y . G G G ." (10)
". . Y . Y G . . G ." (10)
". . Y Y Y G G G G G" (10)
". W . W W . . . A ." (10)
"W . . W W . A A . A" (10)
". . . W . . . A A ." (10)
". . W W . A . A . ." (10)
"W W . W . . A . A A" (10)
So 10x10 input. Output is 5x5 grid. So transformation reduces size by factor 2 (quarter). Likely each 2x2 block of input maps to one output cell based on some rule (competition). The metaphor: four beds merged into one quarter of original plot. So each quadrant? Actually "merged bed is one quarter of the original plot". Means output is quarter area (size half each dimension). So each 2x2 block becomes one cell.
Now rule: "Where roots compete, the most invasive species claims the ground. One flower spreads so aggressively nothing can displace it; the gentlest bloom only survives where the soil is otherwise untended."
Interpretation: There is hierarchy of colors: some dominate others. One species (maybe 'W' maroon?) spreads aggressively and cannot be displaced. The gentlest bloom (maybe '.' black?) only survives where nothing else (i.e., empty). Need to deduce hierarchy from example.
We need to map each 2x2 block to output color based on composition.
Let's compute for each 2x2 block of example input and see output.
I'll label colors: . black, Y yellow, G green, W maroon, A azure, etc.
Create 10x10 grid coordinates rows 0-9, cols 0-9.
I'll write rows as arrays:
r0: . Y Y Y . . . . G G
r1: Y Y . . . G . G G .
r2: Y . . Y Y . G G G .
r3: . . Y . Y G . . G .
r4: . . Y Y Y G G G G G
r5: . W . W W . . . A .
r6: W . . W W . A A . A
r7: . . . W . . . A A .
r8: . . W W . A . A . .
r9: W W . W . . A . A A
Now partition into 2x2 blocks: block (i,j) where i block row = floor(row/2), j block col = floor(col/2). Output 5x5.
Let's compute each block's 4 cells.
Block (0,0): rows0-1 cols0-1:
r0c0 '.' ; r0c1 'Y'; r1c0 'Y'; r1c1 'Y' => set {.,Y}. Output cell (0,0) in output grid is '.' according to output first row first column? Output grid rows:
Output:
". W Y G G"
"G A G G W"
"Y G G G Y"
"G . W G Y"
"G G G G G"
So (0,0) = '.' . So rule picks '.' over Y. So '.' dominates Y? But '.' is black (maybe empty). The description: "gentlest bloom only survives where the soil is otherwise untended." Could be '.' is bare soil, only appears if no other colors? But here there is Y present, yet output is '.' meaning '.' wins over Y. So '.' is most invasive? Or maybe rule: if any '.' present, output '.' else something else? Let's test other blocks.
Block (0,1): rows0-1 cols2-3:
cells: r0c2 'Y', r0c3 'Y', r1c2 '.', r1c3 '.' => {Y, .}. Output (0,1) = 'W' according to output row0 col1 = 'W'. Wait that's not '.' or Y. So there is 'W' present? Not in block. So maybe I misaligned columns: block (0,1) corresponds to columns 2-3 indeed. No W there. So output 'W' cannot be derived from
... [7502 chars truncated]
See: The input is a 5×9 grid with a black background. Embedded within it are two 3×3 patterns made of grey (X) cells, separated by a column of black cells. The left pattern occupies rows 1-3, columns 1-3, and the right pattern occupies rows 1-3, columns 5-7. Each pattern is a distinct arrangement of grey cells against the black background.
Do: 1. Extract the left 3×3 subgrid (rows 1-3, columns 1-3) and the right 3×3 subgrid (rows 1-3, columns 5-7). 2. Identify the shape of the left subgrid to determine the output color: (a) If the left pattern is a T-shape (top row all filled, middle and bottom rows only center filled: XXX / .X. / .X.), the color is Blue (B). (b) If the left pattern is an S-shape (top row right two filled, middle row center filled, bottom row left two filled: .XX / .X. / XX.), the color is Green (G). (c) If the left pattern is a Z-shape (top row left two filled, middle row center filled, bottom row right two filled: XX. / .X. / .XX), the color is Red (R). 3. Create a 3×3 output grid by taking the right subgrid and replacing every grey (X) cell with the determined color. Black (.) cells remain black.
Grid: The input grid is always 5 rows by 9 columns with a black (.) background. Row 0 and row 4 are entirely black, forming borders. The two 3×3 patterns are always located at fixed positions: left pattern at rows 1-3, columns 1-3 and right pattern at rows 1-3, columns 5-7, separated by a black column (column 4). The output grid is always 3×3.
"A secret society's signet ring stamps its color onto a wax seal."
120b: k=3
See: A dark hall holds two artifacts side by side on a velvet display, separated by a thin shadow. On the left sits a signet ring — a grey emblem whose silhouette belongs to one of three ancient orders. On the right lies a blank wax seal, also shaped in grey, waiting to receive the ring's impression.
Do: Read the heraldry of the left signet ring to learn which order it belongs to — each order claims a sacred color. Then press the ring into the wax seal on the right: wherever the seal bears grey, it absorbs the order's color, and wherever the seal is empty darkness, it stays untouched. The seal, now branded, is all that remains.
Grid: The display case is a narrow corridor of darkness. The two artifacts always sit in the same positions within it, like twin pedestals in a museum wing, divided by a single strip of shadow. Only the branded seal — small and square — is carried out of the hall.
We need to infer rule. Input grids are 5 rows x 9 columns? Actually examples show 5 rows, 9 columns. Output grids are 3x3? Yes output is 3 rows, 3 columns. So transformation extracts a 3x3 region (the "seal") on right side, and fills with colors based on left artifact (ring) order color. We need to map: left artifact shape (grey X pattern) determines a color (order's sacred color). Then the right artifact shape (grey X pattern) is the mask: wherever there is X (grey) in right artifact, output gets that color; wherever there is . (black) stays black (represented as .). Output is 3x3. Thus we need to identify left and right artifact positions. The corridor is narrow, with two artifacts side by side separated by a single column of shadow (maybe a column of .?). In examples, the left artifact appears in columns 2-4? Let's examine Example1 input. I'll write coordinates. Row1 all . (top border). Row2: ". X X X . X . X ." Let's index columns 0-8. Row2: col0 '.'; col1 'X'; col2 'X'; col3 'X'; col4 '.'; col5 'X'; col6 '.'; col7 'X'; col8 '.' Row3: ". . X . . X X X ." => col0 '.';1 '.';2 'X';3 '.';4 '.';5 'X';6 'X';7 'X';8 '.' Row4: ". . X . . X X . ." => col0 '.';1 '.';2 'X';3 '.';4 '.';5 'X';6 'X';7 '.';8 '.' So left artifact likely columns 1-3? Let's see pattern of left artifact shape: In example1 left side (columns 1-3) rows 2-4: Rows2-4, cols1-3: Row2: X X X Row3: . X . Row4: . X . That's a shape: a vertical line of X at col2 rows2-4, plus top row full X across 1-3. That's like a T shape? Actually looks like a "signet ring" shape maybe representing order. Right artifact likely columns 5-7? Let's extract columns5-7 rows2-4: Row2 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X => X X X Row4 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => X X . That's shape: top row X . X, middle row X X X, bottom row X X . That's like a different shape. Now output for example1 is: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right artifact shape but with color B (blue) where X present, and . where . present. Indeed compare: right artifact pattern (X . X / X X X / X X .) matches output B . B / B B B / B B . So rule: output = right artifact pattern colored with order's color. Now need to determine order's color based on left artifact shape. In example1 left shape (T shape) maps to color B (blue). Example2 left shape? Let's extract left shape for example2. Example2 input rows2-4 columns? Row2: ". . X X . X . X ." => columns: 0 '.';1 '.';2 'X';3 'X';4 '.';5 'X';6 '.';7 'X';8 '.' Row3: ". . X . . X . X ." => col2 X, col3 ., col4 ., col5 X, col6 ., col7 X Row4: ". X X . . X X . ." => col1 X, col2 X, col3 ., col4 ., col5 X, col6 X, col7 ., col8 . Left artifact columns maybe 1-3? Let's see columns1-3 rows2-4: Row2 col1 '.'; col2 'X'; col3 'X' => . X X Row3 col1 '.'; col2 'X'; col3 '.' => . X . Row4 col1 'X'; col2 'X'; col3 '.' => X X . Pattern: . X X / . X . / X X . That's a shape maybe different order. Output is G . G / G . G / G G . (from exam ... [3003 chars truncated]
"A enzyme reads the folding pattern of a receptor protein and activates a pigment gene, dyeing a nearby cell cluster in the color that receptor demands."
120b: k=4
See: Two cellular colonies float side by side in a dark petri dish, separated by a membrane channel. Each colony is a 3×3 cluster of living (grey) and dead (black) cells. The left colony has folded into a distinctive protein shape; the right colony awaits activation.
Do: Identify the left colony's protein fold — its shape determines which pigment gene activates. The right colony's living cells absorb that pigment, becoming colored, while dead cells remain inert. The membrane and surrounding dish dissolve, leaving only the transformed right colony.
Grid: Input: 5×9 dark dish, two 3×3 colonies at fixed positions. Output: 3×3 grid — the right colony recolored by the left colony's fold identity.
We need to infer rule. We have 5x9 input with border rows of dots (black). Two 3x3 colonies at fixed positions: left colony at columns? Let's map coordinates. Input grid 5 rows, 9 columns. The colonies likely occupy rows 2-4 (1-indexed maybe ignoring border). Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-8. Example1 Input rows: row0: . . . . . . . . . row1: . X X X . X . X . row2: . . X . . X X X . row3: . . X . . X X . . row4: . . . . . . . . . We can extract left 3x3 region: columns 1-3? Let's see left colony likely columns 1-3 (indices 1,2,3) rows 1-3. Extract: rows1-3, cols1-3: row1 col1 X, col2 X, col3 X -> XXX row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . -> .X. row3 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . -> .X. That's a shape: a vertical line of X in middle column plus top row full. Right colony likely columns 5-7? columns 5,6,7 (0-index). Extract rows1-3, cols5-7: row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X -> X.X row2 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X -> XXX row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . -> XX. So right colony pattern. Output for example1: B . B B B B B B . That's 3x3 grid. It seems right colony recolored based on left colony shape? Let's compare left shape (L) and output (O). Left shape pattern of X's maybe determines which color to use for each cell in right colony? Output shows B where right colony had X? Let's map right colony original X positions: positions (relative) where X present: (0,0), (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1). That's 7 cells. Output B appears at many positions: row0 col0 B, col2 B, row1 col0 B, col1 B, col2 B, row2 col0 B, col1 B. That's exactly same positions as X in right colony. The dot (.) output at (2,2) corresponds to original '.' (dead) in right colony. So rule: copy right colony pattern, but color determined by something from left colony. In example1, color is B (blue). So left colony shape maps to color B. Example2: Input left colony? Let's extract left 3x3 columns 1-3 rows1-3: Rows: row1: . . X X . X . X . -> columns1-3: . X X? Wait row1 col1 '.'? Actually row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Let's index: col0 '.', col1 '.', col2 'X', col3 'X', col4 '.', col5 'X', col6 '.', col7 'X', col8 '.'. So left colony columns 1-3 = col1 '.', col2 'X', col3 'X' => .XX row2: ". . X . . X . X ." => col1 '.', col2 'X', col3 '.' => .X. row3: ". X X . . X X . ." => col1 'X', col2 'X', col3 '.' => XX. So left pattern: .XX .X. XX. Right colony columns 5-7 rows1-3: row1 col5 'X', col6 '.', col7 'X' => X.X row2 col5 'X', col6 '.', col7 'X' => X.X row3 col5 'X', col6 'X', col7 '.' => XX. Right pattern: X.X X.X XX. Output example2: G . G G . G G G . Positions of G correspond to X positions in right colony? Let's see: output G at (0,0) G, (0,2) G, (1,0) G, (1,2) G, (2,0) G, (2,1) G. That's same as X positions. So color G (green) determined by left colony shape. Example3: Input left colony columns1-3 rows1-3: row1: . X X X . X . X . => col1 X, col2 X, col3 X => XXX row2: . . X . . . X X . => col1 ., col2 X, col3 . => .X. row3: . . X . . X . X . => c ... [5103 chars truncated]
"A constellation's shape in the left quadrant of the night sky tells the astronomer which spectral class it belongs to, and the stars in the right quadrant glow in that class's characteristic color."
120b: k=2
See: A dark night sky is divided into two 3×3 star-chart quadrants by a dark meridian. Grey dots mark star positions; black is empty sky. The left quadrant's stars trace a recognizable constellation pattern.
Do: Identify the left constellation's pattern to determine its spectral classification color. Every star in the right quadrant takes on that spectral color, while empty sky stays dark. The left quadrant and meridian fade; only the colored right star field remains as the observation.
Grid: Input: 5×9 sky chart, two 3×3 quadrants. Output: 3×3 — right quadrant stars colored by the left constellation's spectral class.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 5x9, with two 3x3 quadrants separated by a column? Let's examine example 1. Input example1 grid (5 rows, 9 columns). Let's write coordinates. Row0: . . . . . . . . . (all .) Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . . X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to identify left quadrant (3x3) and right quadrant (3x3). Likely columns 1-3 left, column 4 maybe meridian, columns 5-7 right? Let's see: total 9 columns, maybe pattern: columns 1-3 left, column4 is meridian (dark), columns5-7 right, columns8-? Actually 9 columns, maybe left quadrant columns 1-3, meridian column 4, right quadrant columns5-7, and columns8-9 are padding? But output is 3x3, representing right quadrant after coloring. Let's extract left quadrant positions (3x3) from input. Which rows correspond? Probably rows 1-3 (since row0 and row4 are empty). So left quadrant rows 1-3, columns 1-3 (0-index?). Let's index columns 0-8. Row1: col0 '.' col1 'X' col2 'X' col3 'X' col4 '.' col5 'X' col6 '.' col7 'X' col8 '.' Row2: col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' col4 '.' col5 'X' col6 'X' col7 'X' col8 '.' Row3: col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' col4 '.' col5 'X' col6 'X' col7 '.' col8 '.' Left quadrant (rows1-3, cols1-3): Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1 cols1-3: X X X Row2 cols1-3: . X . Row3 cols1-3: . X . So pattern: X X X . X . . X . That's a shape like a vertical line with top row full. That resembles maybe letter "T"? Actually shape: top row three X, middle column X, bottom column X. That's a "T" shape. Right quadrant (rows1-3, cols5-7): Rows1-3, cols5-7: Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X Row2 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X => X X X Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => X X . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Output grid (3x3) is: B . B B B B B B . So they replaced each X in right quadrant with color B (blue) and kept '.' as '.'? Indeed output matches: positions where right quadrant had X become B, '.' remain '.'. Thus rule: Determine color based on left quadrant pattern's "spectral classification". In example1, left pattern is T shape, which maps to color B (blue). So we need to map shape to a color. Example2: Input2. Rows: Row0 all . Row1: . . X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X . X . Row3: . X X . . X X . . Row4 all . Extract left quadrant rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1 cols1-3: . X X Row2 cols1-3: . X . Row3 cols1-3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . That's shape maybe like "L" rotated? Let's visualize: coordinates of X: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,0),(2,1). That's like a shape of a "Z"? Actually shape looks like a "S"? Let's see. Right quadrant rows1-3, cols5-7: Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X Row2 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => X X . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . So color G (green) applied to X positions. Thus left pattern maps to green. So we need to map left pattern shape to a color. Likely each of the 7 possible colors correspond to a specific constellation shape (maybe known constell ... [5491 chars truncated]
"A ship reads the semaphore flag arrangement on a lighthouse to its port side, then paints its own starboard signal lanterns in the color that message demands."
120b: k=2
See: A dark sea chart shows two 3×3 signal grids flanking a narrow channel. Grey marks lit signals or raised flags; black marks dark positions. The port-side grid displays flags in a recognizable semaphore arrangement.
Do: Decode the port-side semaphore arrangement to determine the ordered signal color. Light every active lantern on the starboard grid in that color, leaving inactive positions dark. The port-side signals and channel vanish; the starboard lantern display is the final signal.
Grid: Input: 5×9 sea chart, two 3×3 signal grids. Output: 3×3 — starboard lanterns colored by the port-side semaphore's decoded message.
We need to decode puzzle. Input is 5x9 grid with two 3x3 signal grids flanking a narrow channel. Likely left 3x3 (port side) and right 3x3 (starboard side) separated by a column (channel). The input shows '.' black background, 'X' grey marks lit signals. So we need to interpret left 3x3 pattern of X's as semaphore arrangement to determine ordered signal color. Then output is 3x3 grid of colors (letters) for starboard side: we light every active lantern (positions where X present in starboard grid) with that color, inactive positions become '.' (black). The port side and channel vanish. Thus we need to map left 3x3 pattern to a color (single color). The examples: Example1 left grid pattern yields output color B (blue). Example2 left pattern yields output color G (green). Need to deduce mapping from pattern to color. Let's extract left 3x3 from each example. Example1 Input grid (5x9). Let's index rows 0-4, columns 0-8. Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . 1: . X X X . X . X . 2: . . X . . X X X . 3: . . X . . X X . . 4: . . . . . . . . . We need to locate two 3x3 grids flanking a narrow channel. Likely columns 1-3 left grid, column 4 channel, columns 5-7 right grid? Let's test. Columns 0-8. Look at pattern: At row1 col1 X, col2 X, col3 X (three X). Row1 col5 X, col7 X (two X). Row2 col2 X, col5 X, col6 X, col7 X. Row3 col2 X, col5 X, col6 X. Seems left grid maybe columns 1-3 (col1-3). Right grid columns 5-7 (col5-7). Column 4 is channel (all .). Yes column4 is '.' in all rows. So left grid is 3x3 at cols1-3 rows1-3. Right grid at cols5-7 rows1-3. Let's extract left grid for Example1: Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1 (index1): col1 X, col2 X, col3 X => X X X Row2 (index2): col1 .? Wait row2 col1 is '.' (since row2 col0 '.' col1 '.'?), Actually row2 col1 is '.' (since row2 pattern ". . X . . X X X .": positions: col0 '.', col1 '.', col2 'X', col3 '.', col4 '.', col5 'X', col6 'X', col7 'X', col8 '.'). So left grid row2 col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' => . X . Row3 (index3): row3 pattern ". . X . . X X . .": col0 '.', col1 '.', col2 'X', col3 '.', col4 '.', col5 'X', col6 'X', col7 '.', col8 '.'. So left grid row3: . X . Thus left grid pattern: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Now right grid (starboard) for Example1: cols5-7 rows1-3. Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X? Wait row1 pattern ". X X X . X . X .": col5 is after column4 '.'; col5 is 'X' (since at index5). col6 is '.' (index6). col7 is 'X' (index7). So row1: X . X Row2: row2 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X => X X X Row3: row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => X X . Thus right grid pattern: Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . Now output for Example1 is: B . B B B B B B . That's exactly same pattern as right grid but with X replaced by B (blue) and '.' remain '.'? Let's compare: Right grid pattern X . X / X X X / X X . matches output B . B / B B B / B B . Yes. Thus rule: output is right grid pattern colored with the color determined by decoding left grid pattern as semaphore to a color. Now need to decode left ... [4553 chars truncated]
"A logic chip reads the pin configuration on the left socket to determine the voltage rail color, then powers the LED matrix on the right socket in that rail's hue."
120b: k=4
See: A dark circuit board holds two 3×3 IC sockets separated by a trace gap. Grey marks active pins or lit LEDs; black marks inactive positions. The left socket's active pins form a recognizable chip configuration.
Do: Read the left socket's pin configuration to select the voltage rail color. Power every LED in the right socket with that rail color, leaving inactive positions dark. Remove the left socket and board; the lit right LED matrix is the output display.
Grid: Input: 5×9 PCB, two 3×3 sockets. Output: 3×3 — right socket LEDs powered in the left chip configuration's rail color.
We need to infer rule. Input is 5x9 grid with two 3x3 sockets separated by a column gap? Let's examine example 1 input. I'll map coordinates. Input 5 rows, 9 columns. The pattern: row0 all '.'; row4 all '.'; middle rows have X marks. We need to identify left socket (3x3) and right socket (3x3). Likely columns 1-3 left, columns 5-7 right? Let's check. Example1 input rows: Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Indices 0-8. So pattern: col1 X, col2 X, col3 X, col4 ., col5 X, col6 ., col7 X, col8 . Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." We need to locate two 3x3 blocks. Probably left block columns 1-3 (indices 1-3) rows 1-3. Right block columns 5-7 rows 1-3. Let's extract left 3x3 (rows1-3, cols1-3): Rows: r1 cols1-3: X X X r2 cols1-3: . X . r3 cols1-3: . X . So left pattern: X X X . X . . X . Right 3x3 (cols5-7): r1 cols5-7: X . X r2: X X X r3: X X . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Now output for example1: 3x3 grid: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right socket LEDs powered with rail color determined by left socket configuration. The left socket's active pins (X) form a recognizable chip configuration; we need to map that configuration to a color (B, G, R, etc). Then output grid is right socket pattern of X's replaced with that color, while '.' remain '.'? Let's test. Left pattern X's shape: looks like a "T" maybe? Actually pattern: XXX .X. .X. That's like a "T" rotated? That's a "T" shape (top row full, middle column vertical). Which color corresponds? Output uses B (blue) for all X positions in right socket? Right socket pattern X's positions: X . X / X X X / X X . . Output: B . B / B B B / B B . So indeed each X in right socket becomes B, '.' remain '.'. Thus left pattern maps to color B. Example2: Input left pattern? Let's extract. Example2 input rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Left block cols1-3 rows1-3: r1 cols1-3: . X X r2: . X . r3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Right block cols5-7: r1: X . X r2: X . X r3: X X . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . So right X's become G. So left pattern maps to G. What is left pattern shape? .XX / .X. / XX. That's like an L shape? Let's visualize: coordinates of X: (0,1),(0,2),(1,1),(2,0),(2,1). That's like a "S" maybe? Not sure. Example3: Input left pattern? rows: Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . . X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X . X ." Left block cols1-3: r1: X X X r2: . X . r3: . X . Same as example1 left pattern (T). Right block cols5-7: r1: X . X r2: . . X X r3: . X . X Pattern: X . X . . X X . X . X Output: B . B . B B B . B Right X's become B again (since left pattern same as example1). Indeed output matches: positions of X become B. Check: Right pattern X positions: (0,0),(0,2),(1,2),(1,3? wait 3 columns only) Actually right block is 3x3, columns 5-7. Let's index within block (col0-2). Row0: X . X => positions (0,0),(0,2). Row1: . . X X? but only 3 columns, maybe pattern . X X? Wait row1 original: ". . X . . ... [8151 chars truncated]
"A rune carved on the left standing stone reveals which god claims dominion, and the altar stones on the right glow with that deity's sacred color."
120b: k=3
See: A dark ritual ground holds two 3×3 stone arrangements flanking a sacred threshold. Grey marks carved or consecrated stones; black marks bare earth. The left arrangement's carvings trace a recognizable divine rune.
Do: Read the left rune to identify the presiding deity and their sacred color. Every consecrated stone on the right altar absorbs that divine color, while bare earth stays dark. The left standing stones and threshold crumble; only the glowing right altar remains as the blessing.
Grid: Input: 5×9 ritual ground, two 3×3 stone sets. Output: 3×3 — right altar stones glowing in the left rune's deity color.
We need to infer rule. Input is 5x9 grid with border rows of dots (black). There are two 3x3 blocks left and right separated by a column? Let's examine example1 input. I'll map coordinates. 5 rows, 9 columns. Row0 all dots. Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." (positions 0-8). Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." Row4 all dots. So left 3x3 block likely columns 1-3? Let's extract left block rows1-3, cols1-3 (0-index). Row1 col1-3: X X X. Row2 col1-3: . X .? Wait row2 col1 is '.' col2 is 'X' col3 is '.' => . X . . That's not 3x3? Actually left block maybe columns 1-3 inclusive (3 columns). Row3 col1-3: . X . .? Row3 col1 '.' col2 '.'? Wait row3 is ". . X . . X X . .". So col1 '.' col2 '.' col3 'X'. So left block: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . . X That's a pattern: looks like a diagonal? That's a rune maybe representing something. Right block columns maybe 5-7? Let's extract columns 5-7 (0-index). Row1 col5-7: X . X. Row2 col5-7: X X X. Row3 col5-7: X X . . Wait row3 col5 is X, col6 X, col7 '.' . So right block: Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . Now output is 3x3: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right block transformed: X become B (blue) maybe? But note some X become '.'? In output, positions where right block had '.' remain '.'? Right block had pattern: row1 col6 '.' (middle column) becomes '.' in output (position (0,1) is .). Row3 col7 '.' becomes '.' (position (2,2) is .). So rule: replace X with a color determined by left block's "deity color". In example1, output color is B (blue). So left block rune corresponds to deity color blue. Now need to map left block pattern to color. Example2 left block? Input2 rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Extract left block columns 1-3? Row1 col1-3: . X X? Wait row1 col0 '.' col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 'X' . So columns 2-4 maybe? Let's think: The left block likely columns 2-4? In example1 left block columns 1-3 gave pattern X X X; . X .; . . X. That seems like a diagonal from top-left to bottom-right? Actually pattern: row1 all X, row2 middle X, row3 bottom right X. That's like a shape maybe representing a "rune". In example2 left block pattern maybe different shape representing another deity color (green). Output color is G (green). Let's extract left block for example2 using same columns 1-3? Row1 col1-3: . X X (since row1 col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 'X') => . X X. Row2 col1-3: . X . (col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.') => . X . Row3 col1-3: X X . (col1 'X' col2 'X' col3 '.') => X X . So pattern: Row1: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Is that a recognizable rune? Maybe corresponds to green. Now right block columns 5-7: Row1 col5-7: X . X (same as before). Row2: X . X? Row2 col5 X col6 '.'? Wait row2 is ". . X . . X . X .": col5 is X, col6 '.'? Actually col5 index? Let's index: columns 0-8. Row2: positions:0'.',1'.',2'X',3'.',4'.',5'X',6'.',7'X',8'.' So col5 X, col6 '.', col7 X. So right block row2: X . X. Row3: ". X X . . X X . .": col5 X, col6 X, col ... [3491 chars truncated]
"A lead dancer's frozen pose on the left of the floor tells the troupe which emotion to embody, and the dancers on the right glow in that emotion's stage color."
120b: k=2
See: A dark dance floor is split by a center mark into two 3×3 formations. Grey marks dancer positions; black marks empty floor. The left formation's dancers have frozen into a recognizable expressive pose.
Do: Read the left formation's pose to determine the emotional theme and its associated stage-light color. Every dancer in the right formation is bathed in that color, while empty floor stays dark. The left formation exits; only the illuminated right formation remains as the tableau.
Grid: Input: 5×9 floor, two 3×3 formations. Output: 3×3 — right formation dancers lit in the left pose's emotional color.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 5x9 with two 3x3 formations separated by a center column? Let's examine example 1. Input example1 grid (5 rows, 9 cols). Let's map coordinates. I'll write rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . . X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to locate two 3x3 formations. Likely left formation occupies columns 1-3? Let's extract left 3x3 region rows1-3, cols1-3? Let's see: Rows1-3, cols1-3 (0-index): Row1 col1 X, col2 X, col3 X ; Row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . ; Row3 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . . That yields pattern: X X X . X . . X . That's a pose maybe? Right formation maybe columns5-7? Let's extract rows1-3, cols5-7: Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X ; Row2 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X ; Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Now output is 3x3 with colors B (blue) and . (black). Output: B . B B B B B B . So output corresponds to right formation pattern but with X replaced by B (blue) and . stays .? Let's compare: Right formation pattern had X at positions (0,0), (0,2), (1,0),(1,1),(1,2),(2,0),(2,1). Output has B at those same positions, and . at (0,1) and (2,2) which were . in right formation. Yes matches. Thus rule: Determine color based on left formation pose (emotional theme). In example1 left pose corresponds to blue. So left pose pattern maps to color blue. Then apply that color to right formation's X cells. Now need to map left pose patterns to colors. Example2. Example2 input: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X . X . Row3: . X X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . Left formation rows1-3 cols1-3: Row1 col1 ., col2 X, col3 X ; Row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . ; Row3 col1 X, col2 X, col3 . . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Right formation rows1-3 cols5-7: Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X ; Row2 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X ; Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . So right formation X replaced with G (green). So left pose maps to green. Thus we need to identify mapping from left pose pattern to a color. Likely each pose corresponds to a specific emotion/color mapping known (maybe like "peace" = blue, "growth" = green, etc). But we just need to infer for test input. Test input: Rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . 1: . . X X . X X . . 2: . . X . . X X X . 3: . X X . . X . X . 4: . . . . . . . . . Left formation rows1-3 cols1-3: Row1 col1 ., col2 X, col3 X ; Row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . ; Row3 col1 X, col2 X, col3 . . Same as example2? Let's check: Example2 left pattern was . X X / . X . / X X . . Indeed identical! Let's verify row3 col1 X, col2 X, col3 . matches. Yes same pattern. Thus left pose corresponds to green (as in example2). So color = G. Now right formation rows1-3 cols5-7: Need to extract. Columns indices: 0-8. Right formation likely columns5-7 (since center column maybe 4?). Let's extract. Row1: col5 X, col6 X, col7 .? Wait row1: ". . X X . X X . ." Let's index: col0 .,1 .,2 X,3 X,4 .,5 X,6 X,7 ... [585 chars truncated]
"A crystal's fracture pattern in the left outcrop reveals its mineral family, and the ore veins in the right outcrop fluoresce in that mineral's diagnostic color under UV light."
120b: k=2
See: A dark rock face exposes two 3×3 mineral outcrops separated by a barren seam. Grey marks crystalline deposits or ore veins; black marks empty rock. The left outcrop's crystal deposits form a recognizable fracture pattern.
Do: Identify the left outcrop's fracture pattern to determine the mineral family and its diagnostic fluorescence color. Illuminate every ore vein in the right outcrop with that fluorescence color, leaving empty rock dark. The left outcrop and seam erode away; only the fluorescing right outcrop remains as the assay result.
Grid: Input: 5×9 rock face, two 3×3 outcrops. Output: 3×3 — right outcrop veins fluorescing in the left fracture pattern's mineral color.
We need to infer rule. Input is 5x9 grid with border rows of all '.' (black). The middle three rows contain pattern. The description: two 3x3 outcrops separated by a barren seam. So within the 5x9, there are two 3x3 blocks: left outcrop columns 2-4? Let's examine example 1. Example1 Input rows (I'll index columns 0-8). Row0 all '.'. Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." Row4 all '.'. Let's extract left 3x3 outcrop: columns 1-3? Let's see pattern: columns 1-3 rows1-3. Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1 col1 X, col2 X, col3 X => XXX Row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . => .X. Row3 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . => .X. That's a pattern: a vertical line of X in middle column, top row full X. That's like a fracture pattern. Right outcrop: columns 5-7? columns 5-7 rows1-3. Rows1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X.X Row2 col5 X, col6 X, col7 X => XXX Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => XX. So right outcrop pattern of X's. Output is 3x3 grid: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right outcrop shape but colored B (blue) where there were X in right outcrop? Let's compare: Right outcrop X positions: (row1,col5) X => output row1 col1? Need mapping. We need to map right outcrop's X positions to output colored with the mineral color determined from left pattern. The left pattern's fracture pattern determines mineral family and its diagnostic fluorescence color. In example1, left pattern gave color B (blue). So output uses B for positions where right outcrop has X (ore veins). And '.' for empty rock (where right outcrop has .). Let's verify. Right outcrop X layout (3x3): Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . Now output: Row1: B . B matches. Row2: B B B matches. Row3: B B . matches. Yes. Thus rule: Identify left 3x3 pattern of X's; map that pattern to a color (B, G, etc.) based on some classification. Then output a 3x3 grid equal to right outcrop's X pattern, colored with that color, '.' elsewhere. Now need to determine mapping from left pattern to color. Example2. Example2 Input rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Extract left outcrop columns 1-3 rows1-3: Rows1 col1 ., col2 X, col3 X => .XX Row2 col1 ., col2 X, col3 . => .X. Row3 col1 ., col2 X, col3 X => .XX Pattern: a vertical line of X in middle column, plus top row rightmost X, bottom row rightmost X (like a U shape missing left column). Actually shape: column2 all X, column3 X at rows1 and3. Right outcrop columns 5-7 rows1-3: Rows1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X.X Row2 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X.X Row3 col5 X, col6 X, col7 . => XX. Right outcrop X pattern: Row1: X . X Row2: X . X Row3: X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . Matches right outcrop X positions colored G (green). So left pattern maps to G. Thus we need to map left pattern to a color. Need to infer mapping rule: maybe based on shape classification (e.g., which of 2 possible patterns correspond to which color). Could be that each distinct left pattern ... [1438 chars truncated]
"A chef examines the shape of a cookie cutter to choose the icing color, then frosts only the raised parts of a second pastry mold."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark baking sheet holds two grey dough impressions side by side, separated by a clean strip. The left impression is a recognizable cookie-cutter shape; the right impression is an undecorated pastry waiting to be iced.
Do: Read the left cookie cutter's silhouette to determine which color of icing to use. Apply that icing to every raised surface of the right pastry mold, leaving the flat areas bare. Discard the cookie cutter and baking sheet; serve only the iced pastry.
Grid: Input: 5×9 baking sheet with two 3×3 dough shapes at fixed positions. Output: 3×3 iced pastry — right mold's raised cells colored, flat cells black.
"A conductor glances at the shape of a tuning fork to choose the key signature, then orchestrates the neighboring instrument section in that key's color."
120b: k=3
See: A dark concert stage has two grey instrument clusters arranged side by side with a silent gap between them. Each cluster is a small 3×3 arrangement of occupied and empty chairs. The left cluster's seating pattern forms a recognizable tuning-fork silhouette.
Do: Identify the left cluster's tuning-fork shape to determine the key signature — each shape corresponds to a unique tonal color. Paint the occupied chairs of the right cluster in that key's color, leaving empty chairs dark. Remove the left cluster and stage; the colored right section is your score.
Grid: Input: 5×9 stage with two 3×3 chair arrangements. Output: 3×3 — right cluster's occupied seats recolored by the left cluster's shape-determined key.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse examples. We have 5x9 input with two 3x3 clusters side by side with a silent gap column? Let's view coordinates. Example1 Input grid (5 rows, 9 cols). Represent rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . . X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to locate two 3x3 clusters. Likely left cluster columns 1-3? Let's extract 3x3 subgrids. Columns indices 0-8. Probably left cluster occupies columns 1-3 (since there are X's there). Right cluster columns 5-7 maybe. Let's extract left 3x3 (rows 1-3, cols 1-3): Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1 col1-3: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . So pattern: X X X . X . . X . That's a tuning-fork shape? Looks like vertical line with top bar. Right cluster columns 5-7: Rows1-3, cols5-7: Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Now output is 3x3: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right cluster pattern but recolored: where right cluster had X (occupied) become B (blue) maybe? Let's compare: Right cluster pattern X . X / X X X / X X . . Output B . B / B B B / B B . So yes, X's become B, '.' remain '.'. Thus rule: Determine color based on left cluster shape (tuning-fork). The left cluster shape determines which color to paint right cluster's occupied cells. In example1, left shape corresponds to blue (B). So mapping: left shape (tuning-fork) -> color B. Example2 Input: Rows: Row1: . . X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X . X . Row3: . X X . . X X . . Left cluster columns 1-3? Let's extract left 3x3 rows1-3 cols1-3: Row1 col1-3: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . What shape is that? Output color is G (green). Right cluster columns 5-7 pattern? Let's extract right 3x3 cols5-7: Row1 col5-7: X . X Row2: X . X Row3: X X . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output grid: G . G G . G G G . Matches: X->G, '.' stays '.'. Thus left shape maps to G. Example3 Input: Rows: Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . . X X . Row3: . . X . . X . X . Left cluster cols1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Same as example1? Wait example1 left cluster same pattern. But output color is B? Actually example3 output includes both B and . pattern: Output: B . B . B B B . B Right cluster pattern? Let's extract right cluster cols5-7: Row1 col5-7: X . X Row2: . X X Row3: X . X Pattern: X . X . X X X . X Now output: B . B / . B B / B . B matches mapping X->B, '.' stays '.'. So left shape same as example1 (tuning-fork) leads to B again. Good. Thus mapping: left shape determines color. Need to identify which shape corresponds to which color. So far we have two shapes: shape A (tuning-fork) -> B (blue). shape B (different) -> G (green). Possibly more colors exist for other shapes. Now test input: Rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . X X . X X . . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . X X . . X . X . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to extract left and right clusters. Left cluster columns 1-3 rows1-3: Row1 col1-3: . X X Row2: ... [588 chars truncated]
"A referee recognizes the formation a team is running on the left side of the field and raises the corresponding colored flag, which the right squad then wears as their jersey color."
120b: k=2
See: A dark playing field is divided in half by a center line. On each side, a 3×3 zone contains grey player positions and empty spots. The left squad has arranged itself into a recognizable tactical formation.
Do: Read the left squad's formation to determine which colored flag the referee raises. The right squad adopts that flag color on every occupied position, while empty spots stay dark. Clear the field; only the right squad's colored jerseys remain as the final scoreboard.
Grid: Input: 5×9 field, two 3×3 zones. Output: 3×3 — right zone's occupied positions colored by the left formation's identity.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: Input 5x9 grid, two 3x3 zones. Likely left zone columns 2-4? Let's examine example 1. Input example1 grid (5 rows, 9 columns). Let's index rows 0-4, cols 0-8. Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . . X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to locate two 3x3 zones. Probably left zone columns 1-3? Actually center line dividing field. Maybe column 4 is center line? Let's see: columns 0-8, center line maybe column 4 (0-index). Then left zone columns 1-3? Wait need 3x3 zone each side. Could be columns 1-3 for left, columns 5-7 for right, with column 4 empty line. Let's test. Extract left zone (rows 1-3, cols 1-3): Rows 1-3: Row1 cols1-3: X X X Row2 cols1-3: . X . Row3 cols1-3: . X . So left zone pattern: X X X . X . . X . Right zone (rows1-3, cols5-7): Row1 cols5-7: X . X Row2 cols5-7: X X X Row3 cols5-7: X X . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Now output is 3x3: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right zone positions colored B where there was X? Let's compare: Right zone pattern X . X / X X X / X X . . Output B . B / B B B / B B . So indeed wherever right zone had X, output B, and where right zone had . (empty), output . . So output is just right zone colored with a color determined by left formation. Left formation: pattern X X X / . X . / . X . This looks like a "T" shape? Actually shape of a "T" (top row full, middle column). That could correspond to a specific flag color: In example1 output color is B (blue). So left formation maps to color B. Example2: Input2. Rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X . X . Row3: . X X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . Left zone cols1-3 rows1-3: Row1: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Right zone cols5-7 rows1-3: Row1: X . X Row2: X . X Row3: X X . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . So right zone X positions become G (green). So left formation pattern . X X / . X . / X X . maps to color G. Thus rule: Identify left 3x3 pattern, map to a color based on some dictionary of formations. Then apply that color to right zone X positions. We need to deduce mapping for other possible patterns. In test input, left zone pattern will be something; we need to know which color corresponds. Let's compute test input. Test Input rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . X X . X X . . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . X X . . X . X . Row4: . . . . . . . . . Left zone cols1-3 rows1-3: Row1 cols1-3: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Right zone cols5-7 rows1-3: Row1 cols5-7: X X . Row2: X X X Row3: X . X Pattern: X X . X X X X . X Now we need to map left pattern . X X / . X . / X X . to a color. We have seen two patterns mapping to B and G. Need to infer mapping maybe based on shape representing letters? Let's visualize patterns. Pattern1 (example1) (call P1): XXX .X. .X. That's like a "T" shape (vertical line in middle, top bar). Could c ... [927 chars truncated]
"A cloud formation on the western horizon tells the barometer what kind of storm is coming, and the eastern sky's patches light up in that storm's signature hue."
120b: k=3
See: A dark sky stretches across the view, split by a calm column in the center. Two clusters of grey cloud patches hang on either side — the western formation has taken a distinctive meteorological shape, while the eastern patches drift formlessly.
Do: Read the western cloud formation's shape to determine the storm type and its signature color. The eastern cloud patches take on that color while clear sky remains dark. The western clouds dissipate; only the colored eastern sky remains as the forecast.
Grid: Input: 5×9 sky, two 3×3 cloud clusters. Output: 3×3 — eastern patches colored by the western formation's storm identity.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. We have 5x9 input with two 3x3 clusters (western and eastern). Output is 3x3 representing eastern cluster colored based on western shape. Interpretation: The western cluster shape determines a "storm type" and its signature color. Then eastern cluster cells become that color, while clear sky remains dark (black). Western cluster disappears. So we need to map shape to a color. In examples, we can see. First, define coordinates. Input grid 5 rows, 9 columns. The central column? "calm column in the center" maybe column 5? Let's view example 1 input. I'll write rows with indices. Example1 Input rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . X X X . X . X . 3: . . X . . X X X . 4: . . X . . X X . . 5: . . . . . . . . . We have two 3x3 clusters: western cluster likely columns 2-4 rows2-4? Let's extract. Columns 2-4 rows2-4: Row2 col2 X, col3 X, col4 X Row3 col2 ., col3 X, col4 . Row4 col2 ., col3 X, col4 . That's a shape: a top row of three X, middle row with X in middle, bottom row with X in middle. That's like a T shape? Actually shape: a column of X in middle rows2-4 plus top row full. That's like a "T" (upside-down?). Eastern cluster columns maybe 6-8 rows2-4: Rows2 col6 X, col7 ., col8 X Row3 col6 X, col7 X, col8 X Row4 col6 X, col7 X, col8 . Let's list: Row2: X . X Row3: X X X Row4: X X . That's shape maybe like a reversed L? Not needed. Output for example1: B . B B B B B B . That's a 3x3 grid. It seems to correspond to eastern cluster shape but colored B (blue). Let's compare: Eastern cluster shape (X positions) vs output B positions. Eastern cluster X pattern: Row2 (top) X . X -> output row1: B . B matches. Row3 (middle) X X X -> output row2: B B B matches. Row4 (bottom) X X . -> output row3: B B . matches. Thus output is exactly eastern cluster shape, colored with a color determined by western cluster shape. In example1, color is B (blue). So western shape maps to blue. Now example2. Input example2 rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . 2: . . X X . X . X . 3: . . X . . X . X . 4: . X X . . X X . . 5: . . . . . . . . . Western cluster columns 2-4 rows2-4: Rows2 col2 ., col3 X, col4 X Row3 col2 ., col3 X, col4 . Row4 col2 X, col3 X, col4 . Pattern: Row2: . X X Row3: . X . Row4: X X . That's shape maybe like a "Z"? Not sure. Eastern cluster columns 6-8 rows2-4: Rows2 col6 X, col7 ., col8 X Row3 col6 X, col7 ., col8 X Row4 col6 X, col7 X, col8 . Pattern: Row2: X . X Row3: X . X Row4: X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . Matches eastern shape colored G (green). So western shape maps to green. Example3. Input: Row2: . X X X . X . X . Row3: . . X . . . X X . Row4: . . X . . X . X . Western cluster columns 2-4 rows2-4: Rows2 col2 X, col3 X, col4 X Row3 col2 ., col3 X, col4 . Row4 col2 ., col3 X, col4 . Pattern same as example1 (T shape). So western shape same as example1, which gave blue earlier. But output colors are B and also some '.'? Let's see. Eastern cluster columns 6-8 rows2-4: Rows2 col6 X, col7 . ... [1639 chars truncated]
"A keystone's silhouette identifies which guild built the arch, and the neighboring mosaic tiles are glazed in that guild's heraldic color."
120b: k=3
See: A dark wall contains two recessed 3×3 tile panels set side by side, separated by a mortar column. Grey tiles mark the carved areas; black spaces are empty recesses. The left panel's carved pattern forms a recognizable architectural keystone shape.
Do: Identify the left panel's keystone shape to determine which guild's heraldic color applies. Glaze every carved tile in the right panel with that guild color, leaving empty recesses dark. Remove the left panel and wall frame; the glazed right panel is the finished mosaic.
Grid: Input: 5×9 wall, two 3×3 tile panels. Output: 3×3 — right panel's carved tiles glazed in the left keystone's guild color.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 5x9, with '.' black empty, 'X' grey carved tiles. There are two 3x3 panels side by side separated by a column (mortar). The pattern: columns? Let's examine example 1 input. I'll map coordinates. 5 rows, 9 columns. Row0: all '.' (top border) Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Indices 0-8. Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." Row4: all '.' bottom. We need to locate two 3x3 panels. Likely rows 1-3 (3 rows) and columns 1-3 for left panel, columns 5-7 for right panel? Let's see: left panel columns 1-3 (positions 1,2,3). Right panel columns 5-7 (positions 5,6,7). Column 4 is mortar column (all '.' maybe). Indeed column 4 in rows 1-3 is '.' (row1 col4 '.'; row2 col4 '.'; row3 col4 '.'). So panels are 3x3 each. Extract left panel (rows1-3, cols1-3): Rows: r1: cols1-3 = X X X r2: cols1-3 = . X . r3: cols1-3 = . X . So pattern: X X X . X . . X . That's a keystone shape? Looks like a T? Actually shape: top row full, middle column vertical line. Right panel (cols5-7): Rows: r1: col5-7 = X . X r2: = X X X r3: = X X . Pattern: X . X X X X X X . Now output is 3x3 grid: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right panel pattern but colored B (blue) where X were, and '.' where '.' originally? Let's compare: Right panel pattern had X at positions (1,1), (1,3), (2,1-3), (3,1-2). Output has B at those same positions, and '.' at (1,2) and (3,3) where right panel had '.' . Indeed output matches right panel pattern with color B. Thus rule: Determine color based on left panel shape (keystone). The left panel shape corresponds to a particular guild color. In example1, left panel shape is that T shape (maybe representing "blue guild"). So output uses B. Example2: Input pattern left panel? Let's extract. Example2 input rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Left panel cols1-3: Row1 cols1-3 = . X X Row2 = . X . Row3 = X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Right panel cols5-7: Row1 col5-7 = X . X Row2 = X . X Row3 = X X . Pattern: X . X X . X X X . Output: G . G G . G G G . So color G (green) applied to right panel X positions. So left panel shape determines green. What is left panel shape here? Pattern: . X X . X . X X . That's like an L shape rotated? Let's note shape: positions (1,2)(1,3)(2,2)(3,1)(3,2). That's like a "corner" shape maybe representing green guild. Example3: Input left panel pattern? Rows: Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . . X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X . X ." Left panel cols1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Same as example1 left panel (keystone). Wait example3 left panel same as example1. But output colors differ: Output: B . B . B B B . B Right panel pattern? Right panel cols5-7: Row1: X . X Row2: . . X X Row3: X . X Pattern: X . X . . X X X . X Now output has B at positions where X in right panel? Let's compare: Right panel X positions: (1,1),(1,3),(2,3),(2,4?) Wait 3x3 only columns 5-7, so indices within panel: row2 col5-7 = . . X? Actually row2 col5- ... [2172 chars truncated]
"A scout reads the enemy's banner silhouette on the left flank and signals the color code to the right flank, which lights its torches accordingly."
120b: k=5
See: A dark battlefield stretches across the view, bisected by a no-man's-land column. Two 3×3 encampments of grey signal fires and dark ground occupy either flank. The left flank's fires form the shape of a recognized enemy banner.
Do: Decode the left flank's banner shape to determine the threat-level color code. Light the right flank's signal fires in that color, leaving unoccupied ground dark. The left flank and battlefield dissolve; only the right flank's colored signal pattern remains as the dispatch.
Grid: Input: 5×9 battlefield, two 3×3 encampments. Output: 3×3 — right flank fires colored by the left banner's decoded threat level.
We need to infer rule. Input is 5x9 grid with border rows all '.' (black). Middle three rows contain pattern: a column of '.'? Actually description: battlefield bisected by no-man's-land column. Two 3x3 encampments of grey signal fires (X) and dark ground (.) occupy either flank. So left 3x3 block (columns 2-4?) and right 3x3 block (columns 6-8?) with column 5 as no-man's-land? Let's examine example 1 input. Write coordinates: 5 rows, 9 columns. Row0 all '.'; row4 all '.'. Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Indices 0-8. So pattern: columns 1-3 X, column4 '.'? Actually column4 is '.' (index4). column5 X (index5). column6 '.' (index6). column7 X (index7). column8 '.'. Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." So left 3x3 encampment likely columns 1-3 rows1-3? Let's extract left block (col1-3 rows1-3): Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . That's a 3x3 shape of X's forming maybe a banner shape. Right block columns5-7? Actually column5 is index5 (X), column6 index6 '.'? Wait right block maybe columns5-7 (indices5,6,7). Let's extract rows1-3, cols5-7: Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . That's shape. Output for example1 is 3x3: B . B B B B B B . Corresponds to right block colored B (blue) where X were? Let's compare: Right block X pattern: row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X matches output B . B (blue where X). Row2: X X X => B B B matches. Row3: X X . => B B . matches. So rule: output is right block pattern, with color determined by decoding left block shape to a color code. In example1 left block shape (X pattern) is: X X X . X . . X . That's like a "T" shape? Actually looks like a column with top row full. This shape corresponds to color B (blue) in output. So mapping: left shape -> color B. Example2: Input left block? Let's extract. Example2 input rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Left block columns1-3 rows1-3: Row1: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . What shape is that? Output color is G (green). Right block columns5-7 rows1-3: Row1: X . X Row2: X . X Row3: X X . Pattern matches output: G . G G . G G G . Yes. So left shape maps to G. Example3: Input left block columns1-3 rows1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Same as example1? Wait row2 is ". . X . . . X X ." Actually need to re-evaluate example3 input. Example3 input rows: Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . . X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X . X ." Left block cols1-3 rows1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Same as example1 left shape (T). Output is: B . B . B B B . B Right block pattern from input: rows1-3 cols5-7: Row1: X . X Row2: . . X Row3: . X . Let's check: Row1 col5 X, col6 ., col7 X => X . X Row2 col5 ., col6 ., col7 X => . . X Row3 col5 X, col6 ., col7 .? Wait row3 col5 X, col6 ., col7 .? Actually row3: ". . X . . X . X ." indices: 0 '.' 1 '.' 2 X 3 '.' 4 '.' 5 X 6 '.' 7 X 8 '.' So col5 index5 = X, col6 index6 = ., col7 index7 = X. So pattern X . X. Hmm ... [8635 chars truncated]
"A shadow puppet's pose behind the left screen tells the lighting designer which gel to load, bathing the actors on the right stage in that hue."
120b: k=4
See: A dark proscenium arch frames two side-by-side 3×3 stage areas separated by a wing flat. Grey spots mark performer positions or puppet cutouts; black is empty stage. The left area's puppet cutout has assumed a recognizable dramatic pose.
Do: Read the left puppet's pose to select the correct lighting gel color. Illuminate every performer position on the right stage with that color, leaving empty spots in darkness. Strike the puppet screen and proscenium; only the lit right stage remains as the scene.
Grid: Input: 5×9 proscenium, two 3×3 stage areas. Output: 3×3 — right stage performers lit in the color dictated by the left puppet's pose.
We need to decode puzzle. Input grid 5x9, with '.' black empty, 'X' grey spots. The description: proscenium arch frames two side-by-side 3x3 stage areas separated by a wing flat. So the 5x9 grid includes top and bottom rows of '.' (empty). The middle three rows contain the two 3x3 areas separated by a column? Let's examine layout. In examples, input 5x9 with pattern: row0 all '.'; row4 all '.'; rows1-3 have X's. We need to identify left 3x3 area (columns 1-3?) and right 3x3 area (columns 5-7?) with column 4 maybe the wing flat (separator). Let's index columns 0-8. Look at example1 input: Row1: ". X X X . X . X ." Indices:0 '.';1 X;2 X;3 X;4 '.';5 X;6 '.';7 X;8 '.' Row2: ". . X . . X X X ." Row3: ". . X . . X X . ." We need to extract left 3x3 area: columns 1-3? Let's see left area 3x3 would be rows1-3, cols1-3. For example1, those cells: Row1 col1-3: X X X Row2 col1-3: . X . Row3 col1-3: . X . That forms a shape: a "pose". Right area columns5-7: Row1 col5-7: X . X ; Row2: X X X ; Row3: X X . . Wait col5-7 row3: X X .? Actually row3 col5-7: X X . (since row3: ". . X . . X X . .": indices:0 '.';1 '.';2 X;3 '.';4 '.';5 X;6 X;7 '.';8 '.'). So right area is: Row1: X . X Row2: X X X Row3: X X . Now output for example1 is: B . B B B B B B . So output is 3x3 grid where each X in right area turned into B (blue) and '.' remain '.'? Let's compare: Right area pattern had X at positions (row1,col1) (relative) = X becomes B; (row1,col2) '.' stays '.'; (row1,col3) X becomes B. Row2 all X become B B B. Row3 col1 X -> B, col2 X -> B, col3 '.' stays '.' . Indeed output matches mapping: replace X with B, keep '.' as '.'. Thus rule: Determine color based on left puppet pose, then apply that color to right stage's X positions. Now need to map left pose to a color. In example1 left area pattern: X X X . X . . X . What color chosen? Output uses B (blue). So left pose corresponds to blue. Example2 left area? Input2 rows: Row1: ". . X X . X . X ." Row2: ". . X . . X . X ." Row3: ". X X . . X X . ." Left area columns1-3: Row1 col1-3: . X X Row2: . X . Row3: X X . Pattern: . X X . X . X X . Output color G (green). So this left pose maps to green. Example3 left area columns1-3: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . Same as example1? Wait example3 input row2: ". . X . . . X X .": left area col1-3: . X . (same). Row3: ". . X . . X . X .": left area col1-3: . X . (same). So left area same as example1 (X X X; . X .; . X .). Yet output color is B (blue) again? Let's see output3: B . B . B B B . B Right area columns5-7 pattern? Let's compute right area for example3: rows1-3, cols5-7. Row1 col5-7: X . X (same as example1) Row2 col5-7: . . X X? Wait row2: ". . X . . . X X .": indices:0 '.';1 '.';2 X;3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 X;7 X;8 '.'. So cols5-7 = '.' X X? Actually col5 index5 '.'; col6 index6 X; col7 index7 X. So pattern: . X X Row3: row3 ". . X . . X . X .": cols5-7 = X . X? indices:5 X;6 '.';7 X. So X . X. Thus right area pattern differs from example1. Output shows ... [2301 chars truncated]
"A topiary's pruned silhouette tells the gardener which season's bloom color to plant in the adjacent bed, and only the prepared soil patches receive seeds."
120b: k=4
See: A dark garden plot contains two 3×3 planting beds separated by a stone path. Grey marks either shaped hedge or prepared soil; black is bare ground. The left bed's hedge has been pruned into a recognizable topiary silhouette.
Do: Identify the left topiary's silhouette to determine the seasonal bloom color. Plant that color of flower in every prepared soil patch of the right bed, leaving bare ground dark. Remove the topiary and garden borders; the blooming right bed is your harvest.
Grid: Input: 5×9 garden, two 3×3 beds. Output: 3×3 — right bed's soil patches blooming in the left topiary's seasonal color.
We need to infer rule. Let's parse description: Input grid 5x9, with two 3x3 beds separated by a stone path. Grey marks either shaped hedge or prepared soil; black is bare ground. The left bed's hedge has been pruned into a recognizable topiary silhouette. Need to identify left topiary silhouette to determine seasonal bloom color. Plant that color of flower in every prepared soil patch of the right bed, leaving bare ground dark. Remove the topiary and garden borders; the blooming right bed is output (3x3). So output is 3x3 grid representing right bed after transformation: each cell either colored (some color) if that cell in right bed was grey (prepared soil) and we fill with the color determined by left topiary silhouette; else if black (bare ground) we output '.' (black). Also we remove borders (the path and outer rows/cols). So we need to map left topiary shape to a color. From examples, we can deduce mapping: In each example, left 3x3 region (columns 2-4? Actually need to locate). Input 5x9: likely pattern: first column maybe border? Let's index columns 0-8. The two beds are 3x3 each, separated by a column of path? Let's examine Example1 input: Row0: . . . . . . . . . Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X X X . Row3: . . X . . X X . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . We need to locate left 3x3 region of X's (grey). Let's extract columns 1-3 maybe? Row1 columns1-3: X X X (makes sense). Row2 col1-3: . X . (since row2 col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' ), Row3 col1-3: . X . . Actually row3 col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' . So left 3x3 pattern: Row1: X X X Row2: . X . Row3: . X . That's a shape like a T? Actually looks like a vertical line with top row full. That's a topiary silhouette maybe representing letter T? Or maybe shape corresponds to a color: output is B . B / B B B / B B . (blue). So left shape maybe corresponds to blue. Let's see Example2 left shape: Input2 rows: Row1: . . X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . X . X . Row3: . X X . . X X . . Extract left 3x3 columns? Which columns contain left bed? Let's guess columns 2-4? Let's test: Row1 col2-4: X X . (since row1: indices 0 '.' 1 '.' 2 'X' 3 'X' 4 '.' ), Row2 col2-4: X . . (row2: 0 '.' 1 '.' 2 'X' 3 '.' 4 '.' ), Row3 col2-4: X X . (row3: 0 '.' 1 'X' 2 'X' 3 '.' 4 '.' ), So left 3x3 pattern: Row1: X X . Row2: X . . Row3: X X . That's shape maybe like a 'L' rotated? Output color is G (green). So that shape maps to green. Example3 left shape: Input3 rows: Row1: . X X X . X . X . Row2: . . X . . . X X . Row3: . . X . . X . X . Left 3x3 columns maybe 1-3 again? Row1 col1-3: X X X, Row2 col1-3: . X ., Row3 col1-3: . X . . Actually row3 col1 '.' col2 'X' col3 '.' . So same as Example1? Wait Example3 left shape appears same as Example1? Let's compute: Row1 col1-3: X X X, Row2 col1-3: . X ., Row3 col1-3: . X . . That's same as Example1 left shape (top row full, middle column). But output is B . B / . B B / B . B (blue pattern but different arrangement). Output colors are B (blue) again? Actually output grid ... [4740 chars truncated]
See: The grid is divided into two regions by a solid horizontal row of a single color at row 7. Above that divider (rows 0–6) is a mostly black section with exactly three single-pixel colored indicators placed in column 0 at rows 1, 3, and 5. Below (rows 7–19) is a rectangular grid whose background color matches the divider row; scattered across this lower grid are small connected shapes in various colors, some matching the indicator colors and some not.
Do: 1. Identify the three indicator colors from column 0 at rows 1, 3, and 5 in the top section. These are the 'kept' colors. 2. Identify the background color of the lower grid (the color filling the solid divider at row 7). 3. In the lower grid (rows 7–19), find all connected components of each kept color (4-connected adjacency). Count how many distinct components exist for each kept color. 4. Update the top section: for each indicator at row r, extend that color rightward from column 0 so the total number of filled cells in that row equals the component count for that color. If the count is 0, clear the indicator entirely (replace with black). All other cells in the top section remain black. 5. In the lower grid, remove every shape whose color is NOT one of the three kept colors by replacing those cells with the background color. Shapes in kept colors remain unchanged.
Grid: The grid is always 10 columns wide and 20 rows tall. Row 7 is a solid horizontal divider whose color defines the background of the lower 13-row region (rows 7–19). The upper 7 rows (0–6) use black as background, with indicator pixels only at (row 1, col 0), (row 3, col 0), and (row 5, col 0). Odd rows in the top section hold indicators; even rows are entirely black.
"A talent scout watches a parade from a balcony, then reports how popular each act really is."
120b: k=1
See: A balcony overlooks a grand plaza. Three scouts sit stacked along the left railing, each wearing a distinctive color sash. Below, a bustling plaza paved in a single uniform color hosts a fair — small booths and troupes scattered about, each group wearing matching costumes of various colors. Some troupe colors match a scout's sash; others are uninvited performers who snuck in.
Do: Each scout leans over the railing and counts how many separate troupes in the plaza share their sash color — not the number of performers, but the number of distinct groups. The scout then unfurls a banner along the balcony railing, stretching it one tile for each troupe counted. A scout who finds no matching troupes pulls their banner down entirely and disappears. Meanwhile, down in the plaza, security sweeps through and escorts out every uninvited troupe — any group whose costume color doesn't match any scout's sash is absorbed back into the plaza floor, leaving only the scouted acts standing.
Grid: The balcony fills the upper floors (the top seven rows), a quiet black space where scouts sit only on the odd-numbered landings along the leftmost pillar. A solid colored cornice separates balcony from plaza. The plaza stretches below — thirteen rows paved in the cornice's color, with small clustered acts dotted throughout.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 20 rows? Let's count: example input has 20 rows? Actually given 20 rows (top 7 rows balcony, then a row of cornice? Let's examine. In example 1 input: first 7 rows have single colored cells at left column: rows 2 R, 4 A, 6 Y. Others empty. Row 8 is G G G ... (full row of G). That's the cornice? Actually description: balcony top seven rows, quiet black space where scouts sit only on odd-numbered landings along leftmost pillar. So scouts are at rows 2,4,6 (odd-numbered landings? maybe rows 2,4,6). They have colors R, A, Y. Then row 8 is cornice of uniform color (G). Then rows 9-20 are plaza with groups of colors. In output: the scouts rows have been extended horizontally: row2 now has R repeated 4 times then rest empty. Row4 A repeated 2 then rest empty. Row6 Y unchanged? Actually row6 Y . . . . . . . . . (no extension). Wait row6 Y unchanged because maybe no matching groups? Let's see. In plaza, groups: we need to count distinct groups of each scout color. Then extend banner length equal to number of groups. Also remove groups whose color not matching any scout. Let's analyze example. Scouts colors: R, A, Y. Plaza rows (starting row9?). Let's list groups in input. Rows 9-20 (12 rows) after cornice row8. I'll write grid of those rows (10 columns). Row9: G B B G G G R G A G Row10: G B B G G G R G A G Row11: G G G G G G R G A G Row12: G G R R G G G G A G Row13: G G G G G G G G G G Row14: G G A A G G G G G G Row15: G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row16: G G G G G G G G G G Row17: G R R G G G G G G G Row18: G R R G G G G R R G Row19: G G G G G G G G G G Row20: G G G G G G G G G G Now groups: groups are contiguous clusters of same color (connected orthogonally?). Likely groups of same color that are adjacent (4-direction). Need to count distinct groups of each scout color. Scout R: find groups of red (R) in plaza. Let's locate R cells. Rows9-10: column7 is R (positions (9,7) and (10,7)). They are vertically adjacent, forming one group? Also column? Row11 column7 R. Row12 column3-4 are R R (two adjacent). Row17 column2-3 are R R. Row18 column2-3 are R R, also column8-9 are R R. So groups: Group1: the vertical column at col7 rows9-11 (three cells). That's one group. Group2: row12 col3-4 (two cells) adjacent horizontally, separate from above (since row11 col3 is G). So second group. Group3: rows17-18 col2-3 (a 2x2 block? rows17 col2-3 R R, row18 col2-3 R R). That's one group. Group4: row18 col8-9 R R (two cells) separate. Thus total 4 groups of R. Scout A (azure) color A: locate A cells. Rows9-11 column9? Actually column9 is A in rows9-11. That's vertical group of three cells (col9 rows9-11). That's one group. Row12 column9 A (single) adjacent vertically to above? row11 col9 A, so actually continues: row9-12 col9 A forms a vertical group of 4 cells. So group1. Row14 columns3-4 are A A (row14 col3-4). That's separate group2. Row15 columns3-4 A A (row15 col3-4) adjacent vertically to row14 col3-4, so th ... [9544 chars truncated]
"Three antibodies are displayed on a membrane above a petri dish. Each antibody binds only to colonies of its matching antigen below, while foreign organisms are lysed away. The membrane then reports how many colonies each antibody captured by replicating itself that many times."
120b: k=1
See: A thin membrane separates a sterile strip from a crowded culture plate. Three lone antibody markers sit along the left edge of the strip. Below, clusters of colored microbes float in a nutrient medium.
Do: Each antibody identifies and protects colonies of its color in the culture below. Foreign-colored colonies are dissolved into the medium. Then each antibody replicates along its row — one copy per surviving colony it matched.
Grid: The membrane is a solid colored row dividing upper (sterile, black) and lower (culture) zones. Antibody markers occupy column 0 at every other row in the upper strip.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. Upper part: rows with antibodies at column0 at rows 1,3,5? In example input: rows index starting 0: row0 all .; row1 R at col0; row2 all .; row3 A at col0; row4 .; row5 Y at col0; row6 .; then rows7-... have culture with many colors. Output: antibodies replicate along row, but only over columns where matching color colony exists below? Let's examine: In example, after membrane row? The membrane is a solid colored row dividing upper and lower zones. In input, row7 is G G G ... all G? Actually row7: G G G G G G G G G G (all G). That's the membrane? It says solid colored row dividing upper (sterile, black) and lower (culture) zones. In example, row7 is all G (green). So membrane color is G. Upper rows 0-6 are sterile (black .) except antibodies at column0 rows1,3,5 with colors R, A, Y. Lower rows 8-... are culture with various colors. Rule: Each antibody identifies and protects colonies of its color in the culture below. Foreign-colored colonies are dissolved into the medium. Then each antibody replicates along its row — one copy per surviving colony it matched. Interpretation: For each antibody (color) at column0 in upper zone, look at the column below the membrane? Actually "protects colonies of its color in the culture below". So we need to find in the lower zone (rows after membrane) the columns where that color appears in that column? Or any location? Probably each column corresponds to a "colony" vertical line. Antibody replicates along its row (the same row as antibody) one copy per surviving colony it matched. So we need to count number of colonies of that color in the lower zone, and place that many copies of antibody color in its row, starting from leftmost? In output example: Row1 (R antibody) originally at col0, output row1 has R R R R . . . . . . (four Rs). So there were 4 red colonies protected. Where are red cells in lower zone? Look at lower zone rows after membrane (row8 onward). Let's list columns where red appears in lower zone (any row?). In example lower zone rows (8-...): we see many rows with R in various columns. Let's count distinct columns that have at least one R in lower zone? Row8: G B B G G G R G A G -> R at col6. Row9 same. Row10 same. Row11: G G G G G G R G A G -> R at col6. Row12: G G R R G G G G A G -> R at col2,3. Row13: all G. Row14: G G A A G G G G G G -> no R. Row15: G G A A G Y Y Y G G -> no R. Row16: all G. Row17: G R R G G G G G G G -> R at col1,2. Row18: G R R G G G G R R G -> R at col1,2,7,8. Row19: all G. Row20: all G. So columns with R: col1,2,3?,6,7,8? Let's list unique columns: col1 (index1) appears rows17,18. col2 appears rows12,17,18. col3 appears row12 (col3). col6 appears rows8-11. col7 appears row18 (col7). col8 appears row18 (col8). That's 6 distinct columns. But output row1 has only 4 Rs. So maybe rule is count of contiguous clusters? Or maybe only those R colonies that are directly be ... [11134 chars truncated]
"Three spectral filters are mounted on a telescope's eyepiece column. They peer down at a star chart full of colored nebulae on a uniform sky. Nebulae outside every filter's passband fade to background sky, and each filter widens its aperture slit — one increment per nebula of its wavelength that still glows."
120b: fail
See: A telescope column has three colored filter dots along its left edge above a solid horizon. Below, a star chart shows scattered colored nebulae on a uniform sky background.
Do: Nebulae whose color passes no filter dissolve into the sky. Each filter extends its slit rightward — one unit per nebula cluster of its passband color still visible on the chart.
Grid: The horizon is the divider row. Sky color matches it. Filters are at column 0 on odd rows above the horizon.
We need to infer rule. From description: telescope column with three colored filter dots along its left edge above a solid horizon. Below, star chart shows scattered colored nebulae on uniform sky background. Filters extend slit rightward one unit per nebula cluster of its passband color still visible. Interpretation: Input grid has top part (above horizon) with three colored dots in column 0 at odd rows? In examples, horizon is a row of uniform color (maybe G? In example1 horizon row appears at row 7? Let's examine. Example1 input: 20 rows? Actually grid 20x10? Let's count rows: Provided lines: first line . . . . . . . . . . (row0). Then R . . . . . . . . . (row1). Row2 . . . . . . . . . . Row3 A . . . . . . . . . Row4 . . . . . . . . . . Row5 Y . . . . . . . . . Row6 . . . . . . . . . . Row7 G G G G G G G G G G Row8 G B B G G G R G A G Row9 G B B G G G R G A G Row10 G G G G G G R G A G Row11 G G R R G G G G A G Row12 G G G G G G G G G G Row13 G G A A G G G G G G Row14 G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row15 G G G G G G G G G G Row16 G R R G G G G G G G Row17 G R R G G G G R R G Row18 G G G G G G G G G G Row19 G G G G G G G G G G So horizon is row7? Row7 is all G (green). Above horizon rows 0-6 have three colored filter dots at column0: rows1 R, row3 A, row5 Y. Indeed three colored filters (R, A, Y) at odd rows (1,3,5). They are above horizon. The rest of top area is black '.'. Below horizon rows 8-19 contain various colors (nebulae) on background same as horizon (G). The rule: For each filter color, we look at clusters of that color in the lower region (below horizon). For each cluster, we extend a slit rightward from the filter dot, one unit per cluster still visible (i.e., per cluster that remains after transformation?). In output, we see that the filter rows have their colors extended horizontally across some columns. Example1 output: rows1 (R) becomes R R R R . . . . . . (four Rs). Row3 (A) becomes A A . . . . . . . . (two As). Row5 (Y) remains Y . . . . . . . . . (only one Y). So number of Rs extended = 4, As =2, Y=1. Let's count clusters of each color in lower region (below horizon) that are of that color and not removed? In input lower region, there are many R, A, Y clusters. Let's identify clusters of red (R) below horizon: Look at rows8-19. Row8: ... R at col6? Row8: G B B G G G R G A G => R at col6. Row9 same. Row10: G G G G G G R G A G => R at col6. Row11: G G R R G G G G A G => two Rs at col2,3. Row12: all G. Row13: G G A A ... => As at col2,3. Row14: G G A A ... Y Y Y at col5,6,7? Actually row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G => Y at col5,6,7. Row15 all G. Row16: G R R G ... => Rs at col1,2. Row17: G R R G ... R R at col1,2 and also at col7,8? Row17: G R R G G G G R R G => Rs at col1,2 and col7,8. Row18 all G. Row19 all G. Now clusters: Need to define cluster as contiguous orthogonal? Likely each connected component of same color. Let's count clusters of red: - Cluster1: the vertical line at column6 rows8-10 (R at (8,6),(9,6), ... [9291 chars truncated]
"Three pennants fly from a harbor mast above the waterline. Each pennant claims a fleet color. Ships flying unclaimed colors sink beneath the waves. Each pennant then stretches along its yardarm — one length per fleet of its color still afloat."
120b: k=2
See: A harbor mast with three colored pennants at the left edge rises above a waterline. Below, small flotillas of colored ships dot a uniform sea.
Do: Ships whose color matches no pennant sink into the sea. Each pennant extends across its yardarm — one segment per surviving flotilla of its color.
Grid: The waterline is the solid divider. The sea color matches it. Pennants are at column 0 on alternating mast rows.
We need to infer rule. From description: harbor mast with three colored pennants at left edge rises above waterline. Below, small flotillas of colored ships dot a uniform sea. Ships whose color matches no pennant sink. Each pennant extends across its yardarm — one segment per surviving flotilla of its color. Interpretation: Input grid: top part (above waterline) contains three colored cells in column 0 at alternating rows? In examples, there are three colored cells (R, A, Y etc) at column 0 rows 1,3,5? Actually example1 input: rows (0-index): 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: R . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . 3: A . . . . . . . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: Y . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . 7: G G G G G G G G G G ... So top 7 rows include three colored cells at column0 rows1,3,5 (R, A, Y). Those are the pennants? They are three colors. Waterline is solid divider: appears at row 7? Actually row7 is all G (sea color matches waterline). In description waterline is solid divider, sea color matches it. So row7 is waterline and also sea color (G). Below that, the sea region (rows 8-... ) contains various colors (ships). The rule: For each color of pennant, we keep only flotillas (connected groups?) of that color? "Ships whose color matches no pennant sink into the sea." So any ship (colored cell) whose color is not among the three pennant colors should be removed (turned to sea color?). In output example1, we see that only colors R, A, Y survive? Let's check output rows 8 onward. Output example1 rows 8-... (starting row index 7? Actually output same size). Row7 (index7) unchanged: G G G G G G G G G G (waterline). Row8: G G G G G G R G A G (original row8: G B B G G G R G A G). So B's turned to G (sea color) because B not a pennant color. R and A remain because they match pennants (R and A). Row9 same. Row10: G G G G G G R G A G (original row10: G B B G G G R G A G) same. Row11: G G R R G G G G A G (original row11: G G R R G G G G A G) unchanged because colors are R and A (both present). Row12: all G unchanged (original all G). Row13: G G A A G G G G G G (original same). Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G (original same). Row15: all G unchanged. Row16: G R R G G G G G G G (original same). Row17: G R R G G G G R R G (original same). So indeed only colors R, A, Y survive; B turned to G. Also note that Y appears only at row14 column5-7 etc; Y is a pennant color, remains. Thus rule: Identify the three colors present in column0 above waterline (non-zero rows). Those are the allowed colors. Then replace any cell below waterline that is not one of those colors with the sea color (the color of waterline row). Also maybe the allowed colors also extend across yardarm: "Each pennant extends across its yardarm — one segment per surviving flotilla of its color." Means that for each surviving flotilla (connected component) of a given allowed color, we extend the pennant horizontally across its row? In output example1, we see that row1 (R row) origina ... [10255 chars truncated]
"Three colored LEDs sit on a header strip above a circuit board. Components on the board that don't match any LED's color are desoldered, leaving bare copper. Each LED then illuminates additional pads along its trace — one pad per component cluster of matching color still on the board."
120b: k=2
See: A header strip has three colored LEDs at the left edge on alternating pins. Below a bus bar, a circuit board shows small colored component clusters on a uniform copper ground.
Do: Components not matching any LED color are desoldered to bare copper. Each LED lights additional pads across its trace — one per surviving component cluster of its color.
Grid: The bus bar is the solid divider row. Copper ground matches it. LEDs are at column 0 on odd rows above.
We need to infer rule. From description: header strip has three colored LEDs at left edge on alternating pins. Below a bus bar, a circuit board shows small colored component clusters on a uniform copper ground. What to do: Components not matching any LED color are desoldered to bare copper. Each LED lights additional pads across its trace — one per surviving component cluster of its color. Interpretation: Input grid: top rows have single colored cells in column 0 (leftmost) at odd rows? Those are LEDs. Then there is a solid divider row (bus bar) maybe a row of all G? In examples, after some rows, there is a row of many G's (ground). Indeed in example1, rows 7-? Actually input example1: rows 0-? Let's count: 21 rows? Output also 21 rows. The bus bar appears as row of G's (maybe row 7). In example1 input, row 7 (0-index) is "G G G G G G G G G G". That's the bus bar. Above that, rows 0-6 have single colored cells at column0 (R, A, Y etc) interspersed with empty rows. Those are LEDs. After bus bar, there are many rows of G with other colors (clusters). The rule: For each LED color, we keep only components of that color below the bus bar; other colors become G (copper ground). Also each LED lights additional pads across its trace — one per surviving component cluster of its color. That seems to mean that in the rows above the bus bar (LED rows), we fill a horizontal line of that LED color across the row, with length equal to number of clusters of that color below? In example1 output: Row1 (index1) originally had R at column0 only. Output row1 has "R R R R . . . . . ." i.e., four Rs. How many red clusters below? Let's examine input after bus bar (rows 8-20). Need to count red clusters (connected components?) In example1 input after bus bar: rows 8-... Let's list rows after bus bar (starting row8 index). Actually row7 is bus bar (all G). Row8: "G B B G G G R G A G". Row9 same. Row10: "G G G G G G R G A G". Row11: "G G R R G G G G A G". Row12: all G. Row13: "G G A A G G G G G G". Row14: "G G A A G Y Y Y G G". Row15 all G. Row16: "G R R G G G G G G G". Row17: "G R R G G G G R R G". Row18 all G. Row19 all G. Row20 all G. Now count red clusters: Look at positions of R. Row8 col6 (0-index?) Actually columns 0-9. Row8 col6 is R. Row9 col6 R. Row10 col6 R. Row11 col2-3 are R R (adjacent). Row11 also maybe other R? No. Row16 col1-2 are R R. Row17 col1-2 R R and col7-8 R R. So clusters: Let's identify connected components orthogonal adjacency? Likely 4-direction. Cluster1: column6 rows8-10 (vertical line of three). That's one cluster. Cluster2: rows11 col2-3 (two adjacent horizontally) that's second cluster. Cluster3: rows16-17 col1-2 (vertical 2x2 block) that's third cluster. Cluster4: rows17 col7-8 (two adjacent) that's fourth cluster. So total 4 red clusters. Output row1 has 4 Rs horizontally starting at column0? Actually output row1: "R R R R . . . . . ." So exactly 4 Rs placed leftmost contiguous. So rule: For each LED row (color), replace the ... [9443 chars truncated]
"Three patron gods occupy shrines along a sacred column above the mortal realm. Each god favors one color of offering. Offerings in unclaimed colors crumble to dust. Each god then extends their divine aura across their shrine row — one emanation per cluster of offerings in their sacred color that endures below."
120b: k=3
See: A sacred column with three colored shrine marks on its left edge rises above a divine threshold. Below, the mortal realm shows scattered colored offering clusters on a uniform ground.
Do: Offerings not sacred to any god dissolve into the ground. Each god extends their aura rightward — one pulse per cluster of their sacred color still present below.
Grid: The divine threshold is the solid divider. Ground color matches it. Shrine marks are at column 0 on alternating rows above.
We need to infer rule. From description: "sacred column with three colored shrine marks on its left edge rises above a divine threshold. Below, the mortal realm shows scattered colored offering clusters on a uniform ground. What to do: Offerings not sacred to any god dissolve into the ground. Each god extends their aura rightward — one pulse per cluster of their sacred color still present below." Interpretation: Input grid has top part (above a solid divider) with column 0 having colored cells (shrine marks) on alternating rows? In examples, top rows (first 6 rows?) have single colored cells at column 0 (R, A, Y etc). Then there is a divider: a row of all G? Actually in example 1, after row 6 (index 0-5) there is row 7 with "G G G G G G G G G G". That's the threshold (solid divider). Below that, ground color matches it (G). So rows 7 onward are ground with various colors (clusters). The top column 0 has colored marks (R, A, Y, etc) at rows 1,3,5 maybe? Let's examine example1 input: rows (0-index): 0: . . . . . . . . . . 1: R . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . 3: A . . . . . . . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . 5: Y . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . 7: G G G G G G G G G G <-- threshold row 8-... ground rows. So there are three colored marks: R at row1, A at row3, Y at row5. They are "gods". The ground rows have clusters of colors: many G, B, R, A etc. The rule: "Offerings not sacred to any god dissolve into the ground." Means colors in ground that are not among the sacred colors (R, A, Y) become replaced by ground color (G). In output example1, we see that many non-sacred colors turned to G? Let's compare input vs output for ground rows. Input row8: "G B B G G G R G A G" Output row8: "G G G G G G R G A G" -> B's turned to G (since B not sacred). R and A remain (since sacred). Row9 same. Row10: "G G G G G G R G A G" unchanged (already only G,R,A). Row11: "G G R R G G G G A G" unchanged (R and A sacred). Row12: all G unchanged. Row13: "G G A A G G G G G G" unchanged (A sacred). Row14: "G G A A G Y Y Y G G" unchanged (Y sacred). Row15: all G unchanged. Row16: "G R R G G G G G G G" unchanged (R sacred). Row17: "G R R G G G G R R G" unchanged (R). Row18-19 all G unchanged. Thus rule matches: only sacred colors (those appearing in column0 above threshold) are kept; others become ground color (same as threshold row color). Also "Each god extends their aura rightward — one pulse per cluster of their sacred color still present below." Means for each cluster of sacred color in ground, we extend a line to the right? In output, we see that for each sacred color, there is a horizontal line of that color extending rightward from column0? Let's see: In output, rows 1,3,5 (the rows with marks) have extended to the right: Row1 output: "R R R R . . . . . ." (four Rs). Row3: "A A . . . . . . . ." (two As). Row5: "Y . . . . . . . . ." (only Y at column0? Actually output row5: "Y . . . . . . . . ." unchanged? Wait output row5 shows "Y . ... [10110 chars truncated]
"Three choreographers sit at the left edge of a viewing gallery above the dance floor. Each wears a signature color. Dancers whose costumes match no choreographer leave the floor. Each choreographer then extends a ribbon across their gallery row — one streamer per troupe of their color still performing."
120b: fail
See: A viewing gallery with three colored choreographer seats at the left edge overlooks a dance floor below a railing. Small troupes of colored dancers cluster on the uniform floor.
Do: Troupes not matching any choreographer's color exit the floor. Each choreographer unfurls ribbon across their row — one streamer per remaining troupe of their color.
Grid: The railing is the solid divider row. Floor color matches it. Choreographer seats are at column 0 on odd gallery rows.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's analyze. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 20 rows? Let's count: lines given: from . . . . . . . . . . (row0) then R row1, etc up to row? The output also 20 rows. So grid 20x10? Actually each row has 10 columns. Yes 20 rows, 10 columns. Interpretation: "gallery with three colored choreographer seats at the left edge overlooks a dance floor below a railing. Small troupes of colored dancers cluster on the uniform floor. What to do: Troupes not matching any choreographer's color exit the floor. Each choreographer unfurls ribbon across their row — one streamer per remaining troupe of their color. Grid details: The railing is the solid divider row. Floor color matches it. Choreographer seats are at column 0 on odd gallery rows." So there is a "railing" row that separates gallery (top part) from floor (bottom part). In example, which row is railing? Look at input: rows 0-6 have mostly empty except some colored at column0 (R, A, Y). Row7 is "G G G G G G G G G G" all G. That likely is the railing row (solid divider). Floor below that has various colors. In output, rows 0-6 unchanged except modifications: row1 (R at col0) becomes R across row? Actually output row1: "R R R R . . . . . ." So first four columns become R, rest unchanged (dots). Row3 (A) becomes "A A . . . . . . . ." So two As across row. Row5 (Y) unchanged? Input row5 had Y at col0 only, output row5 still "Y . . . . . . . . .". So no ribbon beyond column0. Thus rule: For each choreographer seat (color at column0 on odd gallery rows), we look at floor rows below the railing: there are "troupes" of that same color (clusters). For each troupe of that color, we extend a ribbon across the row of the choreographer, one per troupe, maybe starting from column0 moving right, filling with that color, up to number of troupes? In example, for R seat, there are how many red troupes on floor? Let's examine floor (rows 8-19). Input floor rows (starting row8 after railing row7). Let's list rows 8-19 (0-index). Row8: "G B B G G G R G A G". Row9 same. Row10: "G G G G G G R G A G". Row11: "G G R R G G G G A G". Row12: all G. Row13: "G G A A G G G G G G". Row14: "G G A A G Y Y Y G G". Row15: all G. Row16: "G R R G G G G G G G". Row17: "G R R G G G G R R G". Row18-19 all G. We need to count red troupes (clusters) on floor. Red cells: positions: row8 col6 (R). row9 col6 (R). row10 col6 (R). row11 col2-3 (R R). row16 col1-2 (R R). row17 col1-2 (R R) and col7-8 (R R). So clusters: Let's identify connected components (adjacent orthogonal?). Likely clusters are contiguous orthogonal groups. Let's map: - Cluster A: column6 rows8-10 (vertical three). That's one troupe. - Cluster B: rows11 col2-3 (two adjacent horizontally). That's second troupe. - Cluster C: rows16-17 col1-2 (a 2x2 block). That's third troupe. - Cluster D: rows17 col7-8 (two adjacent). That's fourth troupe. Thus 4 red troupes. Output row1 (R seat) has ribbon of length 4 (R R R R) starting fr ... [10000 chars truncated]
"Three mineral samples are pinned to a survey column above a cross-section of bedrock. Veins in the bedrock that match no sample's mineral are weathered away to base rock. Each sample then extends a core line across its row — one mark per vein of its mineral type still visible in the section below."
120b: k=2
See: A survey column with three colored mineral pins at its left edge sits above a solid stratum line. Below, a bedrock cross-section shows scattered colored mineral veins on a uniform rock matrix.
Do: Veins not matching any pinned mineral erode to base rock. Each mineral pin extends a core line rightward — one tick per surviving vein cluster of its type.
Grid: The stratum line is the solid divider. Base rock color matches it. Mineral pins are at column 0 on alternating survey rows.
We need to infer rule. From description: "survey column with three colored mineral pins at its left edge sits above a solid stratum line. Below, a bedrock cross-section shows scattered colored mineral veins on a uniform rock matrix. What to do: Veins not matching any pinned mineral erode to base rock. Each mineral pin extends a core line rightward — one tick per surviving vein cluster of its type. Grid details: The stratum line is the solid divider. Base rock color matches it. Mineral pins are at column 0 on alternating survey rows." Interpretation: Input grid has top part rows with single colored cells at column 0 (leftmost) on alternating rows (maybe rows 1,3,5 etc). Those are "pins". Then there is a solid line (maybe a row of uniform color) that separates top from bottom. In examples, after some rows, there is a row of many same color (like G row). That is the stratum line. Below that, there is a region of many rows with many colors (the "bedrock"). The rule: For each pin color, we look at clusters of that same color in the bottom region (below the line). Only clusters that are contiguous (maybe orthogonal adjacency) survive; others are eroded (turned into base rock color, which matches the stratum line). Then for each surviving cluster, we extend a line (core line) rightward from the pin position (row of pin) across the number of surviving clusters? Actually "one tick per surviving vein cluster of its type." Means we extend the pin horizontally to the right, marking cells (maybe same color as pin) for each cluster that remains, one cell per cluster, placed adjacent to the pin? In examples, we see that the pins rows have multiple same-colored cells extending rightwards. Let's analyze Example1. Input grid size? 20 rows, 10 columns. Let's list rows with pins (col0) before the stratum line. In Example1 Input: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: R . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: A . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . Row7: G G G G G G G G G G Row8: G B B G G G R G A G Row9: G B B G G G R G A G Row10: G G G G G G R G A G Row11: G G R R G G G G A G Row12: G G G G G G G G G G Row13: G G A A G G G G G G Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row15: G G G G G G G G G G Row16: G R R G G G G G G G Row17: G R R G G G G R R G Row18: G G G G G G G G G G Row19: G G G G G G G G G G So stratum line appears at row7? Row7 is all G. That matches description: "solid stratum line". Base rock color matches it: G. Pins: rows 1 (R), 3 (A), 5 (Y). So three pins. Now output: Let's see rows 1,3,5 after transformation. Output rows: Row0 same . . . . . . . . . . Row1: R R R R . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: A A . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . Rows7-... same as input? Let's check row7 output: G G G G G G G G G G (same) Row8: G G G G G G R G A G (changed: originally G B B G G G R G A G -> B's turned to G) Row9: G G G G G G ... [10154 chars truncated]
"A chef glances at three spice jars on a shelf, then sweeps the cutting board clean of every ingredient that doesn't match those spices. Each jar then fills its shelf row with portions — one per cluster of matching ingredient that survived the purge."
120b: k=2
See: A spice rack with three jars sits above a wide cutting board. The board is covered with clustered piles of colorful ingredients, some matching the jar labels and some not.
Do: Ingredients that don't match any jar are swept off the board. Then each spice jar multiplies across its shelf — one copy for each remaining pile of its flavor below.
Grid: The cutting board is the lower colored region below the divider. The spice rack is the black upper region. Jars are single pixels in column 0.
We need to infer rule. From description: black upper region (.)? Actually black is '.' per key. Upper region is black (.) rows above a divider line? In examples, there is a horizontal line of non-black rows (colored region) below. The "spice rack" is black upper region with jars as single pixels in column 0 (first column) of that region. So the input has some colored pixels in column 0 above the main colored region. Those are the jars. Then lower region contains many colored cells (ingredients). The rule: "Ingredients that don't match any jar are swept off the board. Then each spice jar multiplies across its shelf — one copy for each remaining pile of its flavor below." Interpretation: For each jar color (pixel) in column 0 of upper region, we look at lower region (below some divider) and count the number of piles of that same color present (maybe contiguous groups?). Then we replicate the jar across its row (or across the shelf?) "one copy for each remaining pile of its flavor below." In output examples, we see that the jar's color expands horizontally to the right for a number of cells equal to count of that color piles in lower region after removing non-matching colors. Also "Ingredients that don't match any jar are swept off the board." Means we remove (set to black?) any colored cells in lower region whose color does not appear among the jar colors (i.e., not present in column 0 of upper region). In outputs, we see that lower region retains only colors that match jars; others become black? Let's check Example1. Input Example1: Upper region rows (first 7 rows?) Let's list column0 values: row0 '.' (black), row1 'R', row2 '.', row3 'A', row4 '.', row5 'Y', row6 '.' . So jars: R, A, Y. Lower region starts at row7 onward (since row7 is G G G...). In lower region there are many colors: G, B, R, A, Y etc. Colors present among jars: R, A, Y. Others like G, B should be swept off (set to black). In output, we see lower region rows: many G remain! Wait output still has G's. So maybe the "swept off" only applies to colors not matching any jar *in that column*? But G is not a jar, yet G remains. Let's examine output: rows 7 onward (starting index 7) output row7: G G G G G G G G G G (same as input). So G not removed. So my interpretation wrong. Maybe the "spice rack" is black region above a divider line (maybe a row of all G? Actually in examples, the lower region is the region of many colors, but the "spice rack" is the black region above the first row that contains any non-black color besides column0? Wait in Example1, rows 0-6 have only column0 colored, rest black. That's the rack. Then row7 onward is the board with many colors. The rule: For each jar (color in column0), we look at the board and keep only those piles (connected components) of that color that are *aligned* vertically under the jar? Not sure. Let's analyze transformation: In Example1, input column0 jars: R at row1, A at row3, Y at row5. Output: In rows 1 and 3 and 5 (same rows ... [11028 chars truncated]
"Three soloists wait in the wings, each tuned to a different key. When the curtain rises on the orchestra pit below, instruments not in any soloist's key fall silent. Each soloist then hums a note for every surviving ensemble of their key — the longer the hum, the more ensembles they heard."
120b: fail
See: An upper balcony holds three soloists stacked vertically along the left wall. Below a dividing rail, an orchestra pit teems with small clusters of colored instruments on a uniform stage floor.
Do: Instruments whose color matches no soloist are muted — absorbed into the stage. Each soloist then extends a sustained tone across their row, one beat per cluster of matching instruments still playing below.
Grid: The dividing rail is the solid colored row. The stage floor color matches the rail. Soloists sit at column 0 on alternating rows above.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. Upper part: rows 0-5 have soloists at column0: R at row1, A at row3, Y at row5. Also row? there is also maybe other soloists? In example, there are three soloists stacked vertically along left wall: rows 1,3,5 have colors R, A, Y. The dividing rail is solid colored row: row7? In example, row7 is "G G G G G G G G G G" (all G). That is rail color G. Below that, many rows with clusters. Rule: Instruments whose color matches no soloist are muted — absorbed into the stage. Means in lower area, any cell whose color does not match any of the soloist colors (R, A, Y) becomes the rail color (G). So they turn into G (the floor color). In output example, we see that many cells changed to G. Let's verify: In input lower area rows 8-... there are colors B, R, A, etc. Only colors that match soloists (R, A, Y) remain; others become G. Indeed output rows 8-... show G everywhere except where original had R or A (and maybe Y?). Let's check row8 input: "G B B G G G R G A G". Output row8: "G G G G G G R G A G". So B's turned to G. Row9 same. Row10 input: "G B B G G G R G A G". Output row10: "G G G G G G R G A G". Row11 input: "G G G G G G R G A G". Output unchanged (since only G and R and A). Row12 input: "G G R R G G G G A G". Output unchanged (R and A). Row13 input: all G. unchanged. Row14 input: "G G A A G G G G G G". unchanged (A). Row15 input: "G G A A G Y Y Y G G". Y present, stays. Row16 all G unchanged. Row17 "G R R G G G G G G G" unchanged (R). Row18 "G R R G G G G R R G" unchanged (R). Row19 all G unchanged. Row20 all G unchanged. So rule matches. Also top soloists rows: they extend a sustained tone across their row, one beat per cluster of matching instruments still playing below. Means for each soloist color, we fill its row (above rail) with that color across columns where there is at least one matching instrument in the same column below? Actually output shows row1 (R soloist) changed: originally "R . . . . . . . . ." becomes "R R R R . . . . . .". So first four columns turned to R. Why four? Look at lower area columns 0-? The clusters of matching instruments: For R soloist, look at columns where there is at least one R in the lower area (below rail). In input, below rail (rows 8-... ) there are R's at certain columns: column0? row8 col0 G, row9 G, row10 G, row11 G, row12 G, row13 G, row14 G, row15 G, row16 G, row17 G, row18 G, row19 G. So column0 no R. Column1? row8 B, row9 B, row10 B, etc none. Column2? B etc. Column3? G etc. Column4? G etc. Column5? G etc. Column6? R appears at column6 in many rows. Column7? G etc. Column8? A appears column8. Column9? G. But output row1 has R in columns 0-3 (four positions). That's not matching column6. So maybe rule: extend across row until first non-matching instrument? Wait. Look at A soloist row3: output row3 "A A . . . . . . . .". So two A's at columns0-1. In lower area, A appears at column8 and maybe column? Actually ... [10976 chars truncated]
"Three team captains stand at the sideline, each wearing a different jersey color. They scout the field below for squads wearing their colors. Teams in unclaimed colors are eliminated from the tournament. Each captain then raises flags along the sideline — one flag per squad they claimed."
120b: k=2
See: A sideline strip runs above a playing field separated by a painted boundary line. Three captains in different jerseys stand at the left edge of the sideline. The field is dotted with small squads of colored players.
Do: Squads whose color no captain wears are removed from the field. Each captain plants flags across their sideline row, one per squad of their color remaining on the field.
Grid: The boundary line is the solid divider row. The field's turf color matches this line. Captains occupy column 0 on odd rows above.
We need to infer rule. From description: "sideline strip runs above a playing field separated by a painted boundary line. Three captains in different jerseys stand at the left edge of the sideline. The field is dotted with small squads of colored players. What to do: Squads whose color no captain wears are removed from the field. Each captain plants flags across their sideline row, one per squad of their color remaining on the field." Interpretation: Input grid has top part (sideline) rows above a solid divider row (boundary line). Captains occupy column 0 on odd rows above? Let's examine examples. Example1 input: 20 rows? Let's count. Provided grid 20 rows (0-19). Row 0: . . . . . . . . . . (all black). Row1: R . . . . . . . . . (red at col0). Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: A . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . Row7: G G G G G G G G G G Row8: G B B G G G R G A G Row9: G B B G G G R G A G Row10: G G G G G G R G A G Row11: G G R R G G G G A G Row12: G G G G G G G G G G Row13: G G A A G G G G G G Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row15: G G G G G G G G G G Row16: G R R G G G G G G G Row17: G R R G G G G R R G Row18: G G G G G G G G G G Row19: G G G G G G G G G G So top 7 rows (0-6) are sideline? Row7 is boundary line? Actually description: boundary line is solid divider row. In example, row7 is all G (green). That matches "field's turf color matches this line." So boundary row color is G. Indeed row7 all G. Above rows 0-6 are sideline with captains at column0 on odd rows? Let's see: row1 col0 = R (captain red). row3 col0 = A (azure). row5 col0 = Y (yellow). Those are three captains (different colors). They are on odd rows (1,3,5). Good. So captains colors are R, A, Y. The field below row7 contains squads of various colors (players). The rule: remove squads whose color no captain wears. So we keep only squads of colors R, A, Y? Wait captains colors are R, A, Y. In output, we see modifications: Row1 (captain row) now has R R R R . . . . . . (four Rs across row). That corresponds to number of squads of color R remaining in field. Let's count squads of red in field (below boundary). In input field rows 8-19 (since row7 boundary). Need to identify "squads" meaning contiguous groups? Probably each column? Let's examine: In field, there are many reds scattered. But output shows row1 has 4 Rs at columns 0-3. So there are 4 red squads? Let's analyze field: Look at input rows 8-19. Let's map colors. I'll write rows with indices: 8: G B B G G G R G A G 9: G B B G G G R G A G 10: G G G G G G R G A G 11: G G R R G G G G A G 12: G G G G G G G G G G 13: G G A A G G G G G G 14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G 15: G G G G G G G G G G 16: G R R G G G G G G G 17: G R R G G G G R R G 18: G G G G G G G G G G 19: G G G G G G G G G G Now, squads likely are contiguous clusters of same color (connected orthogonally?) Let's identify red clusters: At rows8-10 column6 (0-index). That's a vertical line of R at (8,6),(9,6),(10,6). ... [10037 chars truncated]
"Three barometric sensors are mounted on a mast above a weather map. Each sensor is tuned to a different pressure system color. Storm cells that match no sensor dissipate, and each sensor extends its reading bar proportional to how many matching systems persist on the map."
120b: fail
See: A vertical mast with three colored sensors rises above a solid horizon line. Below, a weather map shows scattered colored pressure cells on a uniform atmospheric background.
Do: Pressure cells not matching any sensor's color dissolve into the background atmosphere. Each sensor then stretches a bar along its row — one unit per surviving cell of its color on the map below.
Grid: The horizon line is the colored divider row. The atmosphere color matches it. Sensors are single points at column 0 on alternating mast rows.
We need to infer rule. From description: vertical mast with three colored sensors at column 0 on alternating rows? In examples, first column rows 1,3,5 have colors (R, A, Y etc). Those are sensors. The horizon line is a colored divider row, and atmosphere color matches it. In inputs, after some rows of empty (black) and sensors, there is a block of rows with many colors (the map). The horizon line appears as a row of uniform color? Let's examine Example1 input: rows (0-index?). Let's list. Example1 Input grid 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. Row0: all '.' (black). Row1: "R . . . . . . . . ." sensor R at col0 row1. Row2: all '.' Row3: "A . . . . . . . . ." sensor A row3. Row4: '.' Row5: "Y . . . . . . . . ." sensor Y row5. Row6: '.' Row7: "G G G G G G G G G G" row7 all G. Row8: "G B B G G G R G A G". Row9: same as row8. Row10: "G G G G G G R G A G". Row11: "G G R R G G G G A G". Row12: all G. Row13: "G G A A G G G G G G". Row14: "G G A A G Y Y Y G G". Row15: all G. Row16: "G R R G G G G G G G". Row17: "G R R G G G G R R G". Row18: all G. Row19: all G. Output: same top part but sensors rows have extended bars: Row1 output: "R R R R . . . . . ." i.e., sensor R at col0 row1 extended horizontally to right for each surviving R cell in map below? Let's see map below horizon: horizon line likely row7? Actually row7 is all G, maybe horizon line is row7? The description: horizon line is colored divider row. The atmosphere color matches it. So the row of uniform color (G) is horizon, and below that is map. The atmosphere color matches it (i.e., same G). So cells below horizon that are not matching any sensor's color dissolve (become G). Sensors then stretch a bar along its row — one unit per surviving cell of its color on the map below. Thus we need to count, for each sensor color, how many cells of that color appear in the map region (below horizon). Then in the sensor row, we fill that many cells (starting from column0?) with that color, rest become '.'? In example1, sensors: R at row1, A at row3, Y at row5. Map region: rows 8-? Actually horizon row is row7 (all G). So map rows are rows8-? up to row19. Let's count R cells in map: Look at rows8-19. Row8: "G B B G G G R G A G" has one R at col6. Row9 same. Row10: "G G G G G G R G A G" has one R at col6. Row11: "G G R R G G G G A G" has two R at col2,3. Row12: all G none. Row13: none R. Row14: none R. Row15: none. Row16: "G R R G G G G G G G" two R at col1,2. Row17: "G R R G G G G R R G" four R at col1,2,7,8. Row18,19 none. Total R count = 1+1+1+2+2+4 =11? Wait compute: row8 1, row9 1 =>2, row10 1 =>3, row11 2 =>5, row16 2 =>7, row17 4 =>11. So 11 R cells. In output row1: "R R R R . . . . . ." that's only 4 Rs, not 11. Hmm maybe only count R cells in same column as sensor? No. Maybe the bar length equals number of contiguous R cells in map column? Let's examine map columns for R: column0? all G. column1? rows16-17 have R at col1 (two). column2? rows16-17 have R at col2 (two). co ... [9299 chars truncated]
"Three colored blueprints are pinned to a drafting strip above a floor plan. The architect erases every room whose color isn't represented by a blueprint, returning those spaces to bare flooring. Then each blueprint extends across its row — one panel per room of its color that remains on the plan."
120b: k=1
See: A drafting strip with three colored pins along its left edge hangs above a detailed floor plan. The plan shows rooms of various colors on a uniform flooring background, divided from the strip by a solid molding line.
Do: Rooms not matching any pinned color are erased back to bare floor. Each pin then extends rightward across its strip row, one unit per matching room that survived below.
Grid: The molding is the solid divider. The floor color matches the molding. Pins are at column 0 on odd rows of the upper strip.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. Upper strip: first 7 rows? Let's examine: In example input, rows 0-6 have pins at column0 on odd rows? Row0: . . . . . . . . . . (no pin). Row1: R . . . . . . . . . (pin R at col0). Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: A . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: Y . . . . . . . . . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . Row7 onward is floor plan with colors and molding line? Row7: G G G G G G G G G G (maybe molding line? Actually molding is solid divider line separating strip from floor. In description: molding is solid divider. The floor color matches the molding. In example, after row7, there is a row of G's (green) which likely is the molding line? Row7 all G. Then rows8-... have floor colors with various colors. The molding line is row7? It says floor color matches molding. So floor background color is G (green). Indeed rows8 onward have many G's as background, plus other colors. Pins are at column0 on odd rows of upper strip (rows 1,3,5,...). In example, pins: row1 R, row3 A, row5 Y. Those are three pins. Transformation: "Rooms not matching any pinned color are erased back to bare floor. Each pin then extends rightward across its strip row, one unit per matching room that survived below." Interpretation: For each pin color, look at the floor plan below (rows after molding line). Identify contiguous "rooms" of that color? Or count number of cells of that color that are not erased? The rule: rooms not matching any pinned color are erased (set to floor color G). So only cells whose color matches one of the pin colors (R, A, Y) remain; others become floor color G. Then each pin extends rightward across its strip row, one unit per matching room that survived below. Means for each pin row, we fill cells to the right of the pin (in the upper strip) with the pin color, for as many columns as there are surviving rooms of that color? In example output: Row1 originally had R at col0, rest . . . . . . . . . . Output row1: R R R R . . . . . . So 4 Rs extended. How many R rooms survived? In floor plan, look at rows after molding (row8 onward). Count distinct rooms of red? Let's examine example floor after molding (starting row8). I'll list rows 8-? (0-index). Row8: G B B G G G R G A G Row9: G B B G G G R G A G Row10: G G G G G G R G A G Row11: G G R R G G G G A G Row12: G G G G G G G G G G Row13: G G A A G G G G G G Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row15: G G G G G G G G G G Row16: G R R G G G G G G G Row17: G R R G G G G R R G Row18: G G G G G G G G G G Row19: G G G G G G G G G G Now which colors match pins: R, A, Y. So we keep cells of those colors, others become G. Indeed output rows 8-19 show that: Row8 becomes G G G G G G R G A G (B's turned to G). Row9 same. Row10 same. Row11: G G R R G G G G A G (unchanged). Row12 all G. Row13: G G A A G G G G G G (unchanged). Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G (unchanged). Row15 all G. Row16: G R R G G G G G G G (unchanged). Row17: G R R G G G G R R ... [10330 chars truncated]
"Three signal flags fly from a command tower overlooking a battlefield. Each flag claims allegiance to one color of regiment. Unaligned regiments are routed from the field. Each flag then unfurls further along its crossbar — one length per regiment of its color still holding position below."
120b: fail
See: A command tower rises above a battlefield divided by a fortified wall. Three signal flags hang from the tower's left edge. Below, small colored regiments are arrayed across terrain whose color matches the wall.
Do: Regiments whose color matches no signal flag are routed — they vanish into the terrain. Each flag extends along its crossbar, adding one segment per allied regiment still standing below.
Grid: The fortified wall is the solid divider row. Terrain color matches it. Flags are at column 0 on alternating tower rows.
We need to infer rule from example. Let's analyze. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 20 rows? Let's count: lines given: from . . . . . . . . . . (row1) to G G G G G G G G G G (row20). Yes 20 rows, 10 columns. There is a "fortified wall" row: "solid divider row". In description: "The fortified wall is the solid divider row. Terrain color matches it. Flags are at column 0 on alternating tower rows." Looking at example input: rows 8-? Let's see rows 8-? Row8: G G G G G G G G G G (all G). Row9: G B B G G G R G A G. Row10: G B B G G G R G A G. Row11: G G G G G G R G A G. Row12: G G R R G G G G A G. Row13: G G G G G G G G G G. Row14: G G A A G G G G G G. Row15: G G A A G Y Y Y G G. Row16: G G G G G G G G G G. Row17: G R R G G G G G G G. Row18: G R R G G G G R R G. Row19: G G G G G G G G G G. Row20: G G G G G G G G G G. So the "wall" likely is row8? Row8 is all G, matches terrain color G (green). The rows above are tower area? Row1-7 have some colored single cells at column0: row2 R at col0, row4 A at col0, row6 Y at col0. Also row1 is all . (black). Row3 all . etc. So flags at column0 on alternating tower rows: maybe rows 2,4,6? Indeed they have colors R, A, Y. Those are the "signal flags". So flags colors are R, A, Y. Now rule: "Regiments whose color matches no signal flag are routed — they vanish into the terrain. Each flag extends along its crossbar, adding one segment per allied regiment still standing below." Interpretation: For each flag color, we look at rows below the wall (terrain) that have that color (regiments). Those that match a flag survive; others disappear (become terrain color?). In output example, we see changes: In rows 9-... the colors B (blue) and maybe others vanish? Let's compare input vs output. Row9 input: G B B G G G R G A G. Output row9: G G G G G G R G A G. So B's turned to G (terrain color). So blue regiments (B) not matching any flag (R, A, Y) are removed (replaced by G). Row10 same. Row11 input: G G G G G G R G A G unchanged (since only R, A present). Output same. Row12 input: G G R R G G G G A G unchanged. Row13 input: all G unchanged. Row14 input: G G A A G G G G G G unchanged. Row15 input: G G A A G Y Y Y G G unchanged (Y matches flag Y). Row16 input: all G unchanged. Row17 input: G R R G G G G G G G unchanged. Row18 input: G R R G G G G R R G unchanged. Rows 1-7: output shows changes: Row2 input: R . . . . . . . . . ; output row2: R R R R . . . . . . . So flag R extended horizontally across row2 (tower row) adding one segment per allied regiment still standing below. How many R regiments below? Count R cells in terrain rows (below wall) that survived (i.e., not removed). Let's count R in rows 9-20 after removal (i.e., after transformation). In input, R appears in rows 9 (col6), 11 (col6), 12 (col2-3), 15 (col6-8? actually Y Y Y), 17 (col1-2), 18 (col1-2 and col7-8). Let's count total R cells that survive (i.e., not removed). In output, B removed, but R remain. So count R cells in output r ... [11310 chars truncated]
"Three spotlight gels hang in the rigging loft above a stage. When the show begins, any prop whose color isn't filtered by a gel fades into the backdrop. Each gel then widens its beam along its batten — one notch per cluster of matching props still illuminated on stage."
120b: fail
See: A rigging loft holds three colored gels at the left end of alternating battens. Below a proscenium arch, the stage is set with small clusters of colored props on a uniform backdrop.
Do: Props not matching any gel color fade into the backdrop. Each gel widens across its batten — one increment per matching prop cluster that remains visible on stage.
Grid: The proscenium arch is the solid colored divider. The backdrop matches its color. Gels sit at column 0 on odd rows above.
We need to infer rule. From description: "rigging loft holds three colored gels at the left end of alternating battens. Below a proscenium arch, the stage is set with small clusters of colored props on a uniform backdrop. What to do: Props not matching any gel color fade into the backdrop. Each gel widens across its batten — one increment per matching prop cluster that remains visible on stage. Grid details: The proscenium arch is the solid colored divider. The backdrop matches its color. Gels sit at column 0 on odd rows above."
Interpretation: Input grid has top part (some rows) with single colored cells at column 0 on odd rows (maybe rows 1,3,5...). Those are gels. Then there is a solid colored divider (a horizontal line?) The "proscenium arch" is the solid colored divider. In examples, after some rows of single colored cells, there is a block of rows with many colors forming a rectangle (the stage). The divider appears as a row of uniform color? Let's examine Example1 input.
We need to parse dimensions: appears 20 rows, 10 columns? Actually each line has 10 entries. Yes 20 rows.
Rows 0-6 have single colored cell at column0 (R, A, Y etc) and rest '.' (black). Row7 onward is stage with many colors. Let's list rows:
Row0: . . . . . . . . . .
Row1: R . . . . . . . . .
Row2: . . . . . . . . . .
Row3: A . . . . . . . . .
Row4: . . . . . . . . . .
Row5: Y . . . . . . . . .
Row6: . . . . . . . . . .
Row7: G G G G G G G G G G
Row8: G B B G G G R G A G
Row9: G B B G G G R G A G
Row10: G G G G G G R G A G
Row11: G G R R G G G G A G
Row12: G G G G G G G G G G
Row13: G G A A G G G G G G
Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G
Row15: G G G G G G G G G G
Row16: G R R G G G G G G G
Row17: G R R G G G G R R G
Row18: G G G G G G G G G G
Row19: G G G G G G G G G G
So the "divider" is maybe row7? Actually row7 is all G's, which matches the gel color? The gels are at column0 rows 1 (R),3 (A),5 (Y). The divider is row7 all G (the color of the "backdrop"?). In output, we see changes: The gels rows have expanded horizontally: row1 becomes R R R R . . . . . . (four Rs). Row3 becomes A A . . . . . . . . (two As). Row5 remains Y . . . . . . . . . (unchanged). So each gel expands across its batten (row) by one increment per matching prop cluster that remains visible on stage.
What are "prop clusters"? In stage area (rows 7-19), there are clusters of colors. The gel colors are R, A, Y. For each gel, we count clusters of that color that are "visible" (i.e., not faded). Fading occurs for props not matching any gel color (i.e., colors other than R, A, Y). Those become backdrop color (which matches divider color). The divider color is G (the uniform color of row7 and also many other rows). So any color not in {R,A,Y} becomes G.
Thus we need to transform stage: replace any cell whose color is not one of the gel colors with the divider color (G). In output example1, let's check: Row8 originally: G B B G G G R G A G. B is not a gel color, so becomes G. Indeed output row8: G G G
... [10526 chars truncated]
"Three seed markers are staked along the edge of a garden plan. Below a stone border, flower beds bloom in many colors on the soil. The gardener pulls every flower that doesn't match a marker, and then extends each marker's row with tally sticks — one per surviving bed of that color."
120b: fail
See: A planting guide strip has three colored seed markers along its left edge above a stone border row. Below, a garden plot shows small flower beds in various colors on uniform soil.
Do: Flowers not matching any seed marker are uprooted, leaving bare soil. Each marker extends rightward with tally sticks — one per remaining flower bed of its color below the border.
Grid: The stone border is the solid divider. Soil color matches it. Seed markers are at column 0 on alternating rows above.
We need to infer rule. From description: left column markers above a border row (stone border). In examples, input grid has top part with markers in column0 on alternating rows? Let's examine Example1 input: 20x10? Actually grid 20 rows, 10 columns. Row0 all '.'; row1 column0 'R'; row2 all '.'; row3 column0 'A'; row4 '.'; row5 column0 'Y'; row6 '.'; row7 row of G's across entire row (stone border?). Actually row7: "G G G G G G G G G G". That's border row? In description: stone border row is solid divider. In examples, after the markers rows, there is a row of uniform color (maybe G) that acts as border. Then below that, there is a garden plot with various colors. In Example1 output: markers rows have been extended rightward with tally sticks: For each marker color, we count remaining flower beds of that color below the border (i.e., in the garden plot) and fill that many cells to the right of the marker in its row, starting from column1 onward, with that color? Let's verify. In Example1 input, after border row (row7) there are many rows with G and other colors. Need to count number of cells of each marker color (R, A, Y) in the garden plot (rows 8-? maybe rows 8-19). Let's compute quickly. Rows after border (starting row8): Row8: G B B G G G R G A G Row9: G B B G G G R G A G Row10: G G G G G G R G A G Row11: G G R R G G G G A G Row12: G G G G G G G G G G Row13: G G A A G G G G G G Row14: G G A A G Y Y Y G G Row15: G G G G G G G G G G Row16: G R R G G G G G G G Row17: G R R G G G G R R G Row18: G G G G G G G G G G Row19: G G G G G G G G G G Now count R cells: Row8 has one R at col6. Row9 one R. Row10 one R. Row11 none? Actually row11 has none R? row11: G G R R ... there are two R at col2,3 (0-index?). That's two R. Row12 none. Row13 none. Row14 none? row14 has Y Y Y but no R. Row15 none. Row16 has one R at col1? row16: G R R ... two R at col1,2. Row17 has R at col1,2 and also at col7,8? row17: G R R G G G G R R G => three R? Actually positions: col1,2,7,8 = four R? Wait there are two R at col1,2 and two R at col7,8 = total 4 R. Row18 none. Row19 none. Total R count = row8 1 + row9 1 + row10 1 + row11 2 + row16 2 + row17 4 = 11? Let's sum: 1+1+1=3, +2=5, +2=7, +4=11. So 11 R cells. Now output row1 (marker row for R) shows: "R R R R . . . . . ." Actually row1 output: "R R R R . . . . . ." That's 4 R's to the right of column0? Wait row1 originally had R at column0, rest '.' . Output row1 has R at columns0-3 (four Rs). Not 11. So maybe rule is not counting total cells but counting contiguous groups? Let's examine. Maybe the border row is row7 (all G). The garden plot is rows 8-? but maybe only the first column after border? Actually tally sticks extend rightward one per remaining flower bed of its color below the border, but maybe only counting in the same column? Let's think: "Each marker extends rightward with tally sticks — one per remaining flower bed of its color below the border." Could be that each column below border that has th ... [10207 chars truncated]
See: The input is a rectangular grid with a black (.) background containing a small number of colored cells (all the same non-black color) scattered at various positions. Some columns contain one or more colored cells, while other columns contain no colored cells at all.
Do: 1. Identify which columns contain at least one colored cell. These are 'active' columns. 2. For each active column, fill every cell in that column with azure (A), then restore the original colored cells at their original row positions. 3. Leave all inactive columns (those with no colored cells) entirely black (.). This produces a transformed tile the same size as the input. 4. Tile this transformed grid in a 2×2 arrangement: place the tile in the top-left, top-right, bottom-left, and bottom-right, producing an output whose height is twice the input height and whose width is twice the input width.
Grid: The input grid can be any rectangular dimensions. The output grid is exactly twice the width and twice the height of the input, formed by repeating the transformed tile in a 2×2 pattern. The background color is black (.). Azure (A) is used exclusively as the fill color for activated columns and does not appear in the input.
"Colored stars cast pillars of light, and their constellation is printed on four panes of a window."
120b: k=1
See: A dark night sky dotted with a few colored stars. Some vertical lanes of the sky hold stars; others are completely empty and dark.
Do: Each star casts a pillar of azure light that floods its entire vertical lane from horizon to horizon, like a searchlight pointed straight up and down. The stars themselves burn through the glow, keeping their original color. Lanes with no stars remain pitch dark — the light has no source there. Once the illuminated sky is complete, it is photographed and printed identically onto all four panes of a divided window, two across and two down.
Grid: The night sky can be any size. The window is always twice as tall and twice as wide as the original sky, perfectly tiling four identical prints. Black is the darkness of empty space, and azure is the glow that only stars can summon — it never appears on its own.
We need to infer rule. Input grid: black '.' and maybe other colors (stars). In example, input has '.' and X (grey). Output is 2x size? Input size 6x6? Actually input lines: ". X . . . ." (6 columns) and 6 rows. Output appears 12x12 (twice dimensions). Indeed output is 12 rows each 12 columns. The rule: For each column (vertical lane), if any star (non-black?) present, then entire column in output becomes azure A, except original star cells retain their original color. Also the output is tiled 2x2 copies of this transformed grid? Let's examine: Input column 2 (index1) has X at row0 and row4? Actually input rows: row0: . X . . . . ; row4: X . . . . X. So column1 has X at row0, column0 has X at row4, column5 has X at row4. So stars are X (grey). In output, we see many A's and X's. Let's see output first row: "A X . . . A A X . . . A". That's 12 columns. It seems they tiled 2x2: top-left 6x6 transformed, top-right same, bottom-left same, bottom-right same. Let's verify: The transformed 6x6 would have azure A in columns that have any X in original, but keep X where originally. Original columns with X: col0 (row4), col1 (row0), col5 (row4). So transformed grid should have A in those columns for all rows, except at original X positions keep X. Other columns remain black '.'? Let's construct transformed 6x6: rows 0-5, cols0-5. Initialize all '.'. For each column with any X, set entire column to A. Then set original X cells back to X. Columns with X: 0,1,5. Thus column0 all A, but row4 col0 should be X. Column1 all A, but row0 col1 X. Column5 all A, but row4 col5 X. Result grid: Row0: col0 A, col1 X, col2 ., col3 ., col4 ., col5 A => "A X . . . A" Row1: A A . . . A Row2: A A . . . A Row3: A A . . . A Row4: X A . . . X Row5: A A . . . A That matches the top-left 6x6 of output? Let's check output rows 0-5 columns 0-5: Row0 "A X . . . A" yes. Row1 "A A . . . A" yes. Row2 same, Row3 same, Row4 "X A . . . X" yes, Row5 "A A . . . A". Good. Then output repeats this block horizontally and vertically to make 12x12. Indeed rows 0-5 columns 6-11 repeat same pattern. Rows 6-11 repeat same as rows0-5. Thus rule: Identify columns that contain any non-black (colored) cell (any color other than .). Fill entire column with azure A, but keep original colored cells unchanged. Then tile the resulting transformed grid 2x2 (duplicate both horizontally and vertically) to produce output of double dimensions. Now test input: 4x4 grid. Input: Row0: . . G . Row1: . . . . Row2: . . . G Row3: G . . . Colors: G (green) at (0,2), (2,3), (3,0). So columns with any colored cell: column0 (row3), column2 (row0), column3 (row2). Column1 has none. Thus transformed 4x4: set columns 0,2,3 to A, except keep G at original positions. Construct: Initialize all '.'. Column0 all A, but row3 col0 = G (original). Column2 all A, but row0 col2 = G. Column3 all A, but row2 col3 = G. Result rows: Row0: col0 A, col1 ., col2 G, col3 A => "A . G A" Row1: col0 A, col1 ., col2 A, col3 ... [1167 chars truncated]
"Certain cells carry a gene that activates their entire chromosome, flooding it with expression markers while the gene itself remains visible. The organism then undergoes mitosis, duplicating into a 2×2 colony."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A petri dish of mostly dormant cells, with a few carrying an active gene scattered across certain chromosomal columns.
Do: Each chromosome bearing at least one active gene expresses fully in azure, with the original genes still glowing through. Dormant chromosomes stay silent. The culture then divides twice to fill four quadrants.
Grid: Output is twice the height and width of the input, four identical tiles of the transformed dish.
"A few colored stars ignite in an otherwise dark sky. Each star's gravitational pull compresses its entire meridian into a glowing azure band, while the star itself retains its spectral color. The sky is then observed through a quadrant telescope."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky with a few colored stars at scattered positions.
Do: Compress each meridian (column) containing a star into an azure band; stars keep their color. Empty meridians stay dark. View through a 2×2 quadrant lens.
Grid: Output is four identical sky tiles, doubling both dimensions.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid size? Example 1 input appears 6x6? Let's count rows: lines: ". X . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "X . . . . X" ". . . . . ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. Output appears 12x12 (double dimensions). Indeed output lines count 12 rows, each row length 12. So rule: compress each column containing a star (X) into azure band (A) and stars keep color. Empty columns stay black (.)? But output shows many A's and X's. Let's examine. Input columns with X: column 2 (index1) has X at row0? Actually first row ". X . . . ." column1 has X. Also row4 "X . . . . X": column0 X, column5 X. So columns containing any X are columns 0,1,5. Those three columns become azure band? In output, we see many A's across many columns, not just three. Let's map. Output first row: "A X . . . A A X . . . A". That's 12 columns. Let's split into 2x2 quadrants? The description: "View through a 2×2 quadrant lens. Grid details: Output is four identical sky tiles, doubling both dimensions." Means output is 2x2 tiling of a transformed version? Possibly we take input, apply column compression to azure band, then scale up by factor 2 (both dimensions) replicating each cell into 2x2 block? But output shows pattern not simple replication. Let's attempt to compute transformation: For each column in input, if column has any X, then in output that column becomes azure (A) across all rows, but stars (X) remain at their positions. Also empty columns become black (.)? However output shows many A's even in columns that originally had no X. Let's examine column mapping. Input columns 0-5. Output columns 0-11. Maybe each input column expands to two output columns (doubling width). So column0 -> output columns 0,1; column1 -> 2,3; column2 ->4,5; column3 ->6,7; column4 ->8,9; column5 ->10,11. Let's test. Column0 had X at row4. So output columns 0,1 should be azure band with X at appropriate rows (maybe duplicated). Output rows also doubled: each input row becomes two output rows. Check output rows 0-1 correspond to input row0? Input row0: ". X . . . .". So after transformation, columns 0,1 (from col0) should be azure (A) because column0 has X somewhere (not in this row). So rows 0,1 columns0,1 should be A. Indeed output row0 col0 = A, col1 = X? Wait row0 col1 is X. That's interesting: X appears at column1 (output) not column0. So maybe the X from column1 (input) maps to output column1? Let's map: Input column1 has X at row0. That column is "has star". So output columns 2,3 correspond to input column1? Actually mapping earlier: col1 -> output 2,3. But X appears at column1, not 2 or 3. So maybe mapping is different: each input column expands to two output columns, but the first of the pair is azure (A) and second retains original content? Let's test: Input column0 had X at row4. Output column0 maybe A, column1 maybe X (if star present). Indeed row4 output column0? Let's check output row4 (index4) line: "X A . . . ... [11229 chars truncated]
"Colored buoys float at scattered positions in a dark sea. Wherever a buoy is anchored, the entire shipping lane beneath it is marked with azure dye, though the buoy keeps its painted color. The chart is then printed on four adjoining navigation tiles."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark ocean chart with a few colored buoys at various positions.
Do: Mark every shipping lane (column) containing a buoy with azure dye; buoys retain their color. Unmarked lanes stay dark. Tile the chart in a 2×2 arrangement.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions as four identical chart tiles.
"A few colored LEDs are soldered onto a dark circuit board. Each LED energizes its entire trace, which lights up azure, while the LED itself glows its original color. The board design is then stamped into a 2×2 panel array."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark circuit board with a few colored LEDs at scattered positions.
Do: Energize every trace (column) containing an LED with azure current; LEDs keep their color. Dead traces stay dark. Stamp the board into a 2×2 panel.
Grid: Output is four identical boards, doubling both dimensions.
"Colored runes are carved into a dark stone tablet. Each rune awakens the power of its entire ley line, which glows azure, while the rune itself burns with its original fire. The tablet is then mirrored by the gods across four realms."
120b: k=3
See: A dark tablet with a few colored runes at scattered positions.
Do: Awaken every ley line (column) containing a rune in azure; runes keep their color. Dormant lines stay dark. Mirror the tablet into a 2×2 arrangement of realms.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions as four identical realm tiles.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Awaken every ley line (column) containing a rune in azure; runes keep their color. Dormant lines stay dark. Mirror the tablet into a 2×2 arrangement of realms. Output doubles both dimensions as four identical realm tiles." Interpretation: Input grid with various colors. Identify columns that contain azure (A). Those columns become "awakened": maybe fill entire column with azure? But examples: In example 2, input has R at (0,0) and (2,2). No azure in input. Output shows many A's. So maybe azure is the "new" color used to fill columns that have any non-black? Wait description: "Awaken every ley line (column) containing a rune in azure; runes keep their color. Dormant lines stay dark." Means columns that have an azure rune become fully azure (except original colored runes stay). But input may not have azure; maybe azure is the default fill for all columns that have any rune (any non-black). Let's examine. Example 2 input 3x3: Row0: R . . Row1: . . . Row2: . . R Columns: col0 has R at (0,0). col2 has R at (2,2). No azure. Output is 6x6 (double dimensions). Let's view output grid 6x6. Provided as 6 rows each of 6? Actually output lines: R . A R . A A . A A . A A . R A . R R . A R . A A . A A . A A . R A . R That's 6 rows, 6 columns. So dimensions doubled (3*2=6). The output appears to be tiled 2x2 of a 3x3 "realm tile". Let's extract top-left 3x3 tile (rows0-2, cols0-2): Rows0-2, cols0-2: R . A A . A A . R That's a 3x3 tile. The other tiles are copies? Let's check top-right tile (cols3-5): Rows0-2, cols3-5: R . A A . A A . R Same as left tile. Bottom-left (rows3-5, cols0-2): R . A A . A A . R Same. Bottom-right same. So indeed output is 2x2 tiling of identical tile derived from input. Now what is transformation from input to tile? Input 3x3: R . . . . . . . R Output tile (3x3): R . A A . A A . R Observations: Original R's remain R at same positions (0,0) and (2,2). Azure (A) appears in columns that contain a rune? Which columns have any non-black? Column0 has R at (0,0). Column2 has R at (2,2). Column1 has none. In output tile, column0: rows0 R, row1 A, row2 A. So column0 filled with A except original R stays. Column2: rows0 A, row1 A, row2 R. So column2 filled with A except original R. Column1 remains all '.'? Actually output tile column1: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 '.'? Wait output tile column1 values: from tile rows: row0 col1 '.'; row1 col1 '.'; row2 col1 '.' . Yes column1 stays '.' (black). So rule: For each column that contains any non-black rune (any color) in input, fill entire column with azure (A) in output, but keep original colored runes unchanged (they stay their original color). Other columns stay black. Now example 1: Input size? Let's count rows: 6 rows, 6 columns. Input grid includes '.' and X (grey). X is a rune (colored). No azure. Output is 12x12 (double). Let's examine column behavior. Input columns with X? Let's list positions: Row0 col1 X? Actually first row: ". X . . . ." (co ... [3504 chars truncated]
"A few dancers in colored costumes take their marks on a dark stage floor. Each occupied lane of the stage is bathed in azure follow-spot, while the dancers themselves shimmer in their original hues. The choreography is then performed simultaneously on four mirrored stages."
120b: k=1
See: A dark dance floor with a few costumed dancers at scattered marks.
Do: Bathe every lane containing a dancer in azure light; dancers keep their color. Empty lanes stay dark. Repeat the tableau across a 2×2 stage arrangement.
Grid: Output is four identical stages, double the original dimensions.
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid size? Input appears 6x6? Let's count lines: Input lines: ". X . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "X . . . . X" ". . . . . ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. Output is 12x12 (double dimensions). Output shown 12 rows each with 12 entries. It says "four identical stages, double the original dimensions." So output is 2x2 tiling of transformed version? Let's examine output pattern. We need to see transformation: "Bathe every lane containing a dancer in azure light; dancers keep their color. Empty lanes stay dark. Repeat the tableau across a 2×2 stage arrangement." Interpretation: "lane" maybe row or column? "dancer" are colored cells (non-black?). In input, there are X (grey) at (0,1) and (4,0) and (4,5). Those are dancers? X is grey. Output shows many A (azure) added. Let's map: Input positions of X: (row0,col1), (row4,col0), (row4,col5). Output 12x12: Let's see top-left 6x6 quadrant? Output first 6 rows, first 6 columns? Row0: "A X . . . A". That's 6 entries. So top-left quadrant (size 6) row0 col0 = A, col1 = X, col2-4 = ., col5 = A. So original X at (0,1) remains X. Also new A at (0,0) and (0,5). So azure added to lanes containing a dancer. Which lanes? Row0 contains X at col1, so entire row becomes azure? In output row0 first 6 columns: A X . . . A. Not all azure; only positions at columns where original had something? Actually original row0 had X at col1, rest . . . . . . So after transformation, row0 has A at col0 and col5 (edges) but not at other columns (col2-4 remain .). So not whole row. Maybe "lane" means column? Column1 contains X at row0 and also maybe other X? Column1 also has no other X. In output column1 (first 6 rows) values: row0 X, row1 A, row2 A, row3 A, row4 A, row5 A. Indeed column1 becomes A except where original X stays X. So column1 is "bathed" azure. Similarly column0 has X at row4, so column0 becomes A except at row4 where X stays X. Check output column0 rows0-5: row0 A, row1 A, row2 A, row3 A, row4 X, row5 A. Yes matches. Column5 has X at row4, so column5 becomes A except at row4 where X stays X. Output column5 rows0-5: row0 A, row1 A, row2 A, row3 A, row4 X, row5 A. Yes. Thus rule: For each column that contains at least one non-black (i.e., dancer) in the input, set all cells in that column to azure (A) in the output, except preserve original non-black colors at their positions. Rows unchanged? The output also includes tiling 2x2 of this transformed grid. Now check bottom-right quadrant (rows6-11, cols6-11) should be same as top-left? Let's see row6 (which is row0 of second tile) output: "A X . . . A". Indeed same as row0. So they tiled the transformed 6x6 grid into 2x2 arrangement to make 12x12. Thus algorithm: - Input grid size N x N (maybe rectangular). Identify columns that have any non-'.' (i.e., any colored cell other than black). For each such column, in the output transformed tile, set all cells in that column to A, except keep original cell' ... [2382 chars truncated]
"Colored mineral deposits are discovered at scattered depths in a dark cross-section of rock. Each vein containing a deposit is permeated with azure groundwater, though the mineral itself keeps its natural color. The geological survey is then mapped across four adjacent quadrants."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark rock cross-section with a few colored mineral deposits at scattered positions.
Do: Permeate every vein (column) containing a deposit with azure groundwater; minerals keep their color. Barren veins stay dark. Map the survey as a 2×2 quadrant display.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions with four identical survey quadrants.
"A few spice seeds land in certain lanes of a baking tray. Wherever a seed falls, its flavor bleeds through the entire column of dough, staining it blue—though the seed itself keeps its original color. Then the pastry sheet is quartered and reassembled into a doubled display."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A rectangular tray of plain dough with a handful of colored spice seeds dropped at scattered positions.
Do: Any column touched by a seed is saturated with azure glaze from top to bottom, seeds remaining visible. Untouched columns stay plain. The finished sheet is replicated into a 2×2 arrangement.
Grid: The output is a 2×2 tiling of the glazed tray, doubling both dimensions.
"On a silent staff, a few notes ring out. Each string they touch resonates completely, humming in azure, while the struck notes keep their original timbre. The entire passage is then repeated in a four-part canon."
120b: k=1
See: A mostly silent grid-staff with a few colored notes placed on scattered strings.
Do: Every string holding at least one note vibrates fully in azure, original notes persisting in color. Silent strings remain mute. The resonating staff is echoed in a 2×2 arrangement.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions via four identical copies of the transformed staff.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is some size, output is double dimensions (2x). Example: Input size? Let's count. Input example 1 lines: appears 6 rows, each 6 columns? Let's check: ". X . . . ." that's 6. So 6x6 input. Output appears 12x12 (double both dimensions). Indeed output lines count: appears 12 rows, each 12 columns. The output is composed of four identical copies of transformed staff? The description: "The resonating staff is echoed in a 2×2 arrangement. Grid details: Output doubles both dimensions via four identical copies of the transformed staff." So we take input, apply transformation (some cells become azure A, others stay same). Then tile that transformed grid in a 2x2 block to make double size. Now need to determine transformation: "Every string holding at least one note vibrates fully in azure, original notes persisting in color. Silent strings remain mute." Strings likely rows? Or columns? "staff" with strings maybe rows (like musical staff lines). "notes placed on scattered strings." So each row that contains at least one colored note (non-black? maybe non '.'?) becomes fully azure (A) except original notes keep their color. Silent strings (rows with no notes) remain mute (i.e., stay black '.'?). In example, input has '.' black and X grey? Wait X is grey. In example input, there are X's at (0,1) and (4,0) and (4,5). Those are grey notes? So they are colored notes (non-black). So rows containing at least one non-'.' become azure across entire row, but original colored cells keep their original color (X). Rows with only '.' remain '.'? Let's test. Input rows (0-index): 0: . X . . . . -> contains X, so row becomes azure A across all columns, but X stays X. Output top-left quadrant (first 6 rows, first 6 cols) should reflect that. Let's look at output first 6 rows, first 6 columns (since tiled 2x2). Output row0 col0-5: "A X . . . A". Indeed row0: A X . . . A. So positions originally '.' become A, X stays X, and last column originally '.' became A (since row length 6). Good. Row1 input: . . . . . . (all .) -> silent row, should remain '.'? Output row1 first 6: "A A . . . A". Wait row1 has A's even though input row had no notes. So my assumption wrong. Let's examine: Row1 in output has A at columns 0,1,5. So row became azure partially? Let's see maybe columns (strings) are columns not rows. Let's consider columns as strings. Each column that has at least one note becomes azure across entire column, preserving original notes. Silent columns remain '.'. Check input columns: column0: row0 '.' row1 '.' row2 '.' row3 '.' row4 X row5 '.' => contains X, so column0 should become azure. In output, column0 (first column) across all rows should be A except X stays X. Indeed output first column rows: row0 A, row1 A, row2 A, row3 A, row4 X, row5 A, row6 A, row7 A, row8 A, row9 A, row10 X, row11 A. Yes matches. Column1: input has X at (0,1) and maybe others? Row0 X, others '.' => contains note, so column1 becomes azure. Ou ... [2879 chars truncated]
"Players take positions on a field. Any lane with a player gets the floodlights turned on, bathing the whole lane in light, though the players' jerseys still show through. The stadium jumbotron then mirrors the field across four screens."
120b: k=2
See: A dark playing field with a few colored players standing in scattered positions.
Do: Illuminate every lane containing a player with azure light, keeping player colors intact. Dark lanes stay unlit. Display the result on four screens in a 2×2 grid.
Grid: Output is double the width and height, four copies of the illuminated field.
We need to infer rule. From description: "Illuminate every lane containing a player with azure light, keeping player colors intact. Dark lanes stay unlit. Display the result on four screens in a 2×2 grid. Grid details: Output is double the width and height, four copies of the illuminated field." Interpretation: Input grid with colored cells (players) and '.' black (dark). "Lane" likely means row and column? Or maybe both row and column lines? "Illuminate every lane containing a player" meaning any row or column that has at least one non-black cell gets filled with azure (A) except where original colored cells remain. So we produce a grid where all cells in rows or columns that contain any colored cell become A, unless they already have a colored cell (keep original). Cells in rows and columns with no colored cells remain '.' (black). Then output is double width and height, four copies in 2x2 arrangement (i.e., tile the transformed grid 2x2). Let's test with Example 1. Example1 input size? Let's count rows: given lines: ". X . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "X . . . . X" ". . . . . ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. Now compute transformation: Identify rows with any non-'.' (i.e., X). Row0 has X at col1 => row illuminated. Row1 none => not illuminated. Row2 none. Row3 none. Row4 has X at col0 and col5 => illuminated. Row5 none. Columns with any non-'.': col0 has X at row4 => illuminated. col1 has X at row0 => illuminated. col5 has X at row4 => illuminated. Others none. Now produce new grid: For each cell, if its row is illuminated OR its column is illuminated, set to A unless original is non-'.' (keep original). If both row and column not illuminated, keep '.'. Let's compute resulting 6x6 grid. Create matrix. Row0 (illuminated): original: . X . . . . Columns: col0 not illuminated? col0 illuminated (yes). col1 illuminated (yes). col2 not, col3 not, col4 not, col5 not. But row illuminated overrides: all cells become A unless original non-'.' (X). So row0: col0 becomes A (original '.'), col1 stays X, col2 A, col3 A, col4 A, col5 A. So row0: A X A A A A. But output first row in example: "A X . . . A". Wait they have '.' not A in some positions. Let's check output first row: "A X . . . A". That's 6 columns: A, X, ., ., ., A. So they didn't fill all row cells with A, only some. So my interpretation wrong. Let's examine output more fully. Provided output is 12x12 (double size). They said four copies of illuminated field. So first we need to compute illuminated field (same size as input) then tile 2x2 to get 12x12. Let's see if first 6 rows of output correspond to tiled version? Output first 6 rows (since 12 rows total). Let's list first 6 rows of output: 1: A X . . . A A X . . . A 2: A A . . . A A A . . . A 3: A A . . . A A A . . . A 4: A A . . . A A A . . . A 5: X A . . . X X A . . . X 6: A A . . . A A A . . . A These are 12 columns each. If we split each row into two halves of 6 columns, we might see the ... [6940 chars truncated]
"Colored lightning strikes hit a flat landscape. Each bolt electrifies the entire vertical column of sky it descends through, leaving an azure afterglow, while the strike point itself retains its original hue. The storm is reflected in four mirrored cloud layers."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky with a few colored lightning strikes at scattered positions.
Do: Every column of sky struck by lightning glows azure from top to bottom; strike points keep their color. Unaffected columns remain dark. The sky is tiled 2×2.
Grid: Output is four identical copies of the electrified sky, doubling dimensions.
"An architect surveys a dark blueprint. Wherever a colored rivet is placed, the entire supporting column is drawn in azure, with the rivet itself staying its original color. The blueprint is then printed in quadruplicate across a fourfold sheet."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A blank blueprint with a few colored rivets at various positions.
Do: Draw full azure columns wherever a rivet exists; rivets remain their color. Empty columns stay blank. Print the blueprint as a 2×2 mosaic.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions with four identical blueprint copies.
"Signal flares of various colors are launched from scattered positions on a dark battlefield. Each flare illuminates its entire trench line in azure, though the flare itself burns its original color. Command then projects the battlefield onto four map quadrants."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield grid with a few colored signal flares at scattered coordinates.
Do: Each trench line (column) containing a flare is fully lit azure; flares keep their color. Quiet lines stay dark. The map is reproduced in a 2×2 tactical display.
Grid: Output is four identical map tiles, double the original dimensions.
We need to infer rule. Input grid size? Example1 input appears 6x6? Let's count rows: lines show 6 rows each with 6 entries. Output appears 12x12 (double dimensions). Output pattern: four identical tiles? Let's examine. Input has '.' black and 'X' grey flares. Output: azure 'A' fills columns that contain a flare? Description: "Each trench line (column) containing a flare is fully lit azure; flares keep their color. Quiet lines stay dark. The map is reproduced in a 2×2 tactical display. Output is four identical map tiles, double the original dimensions." Interpretation: For each column in input that has at least one flare (X), the entire column in output becomes azure (A) except where original flare positions retain X. Columns without flare become black '.'? But output shows many A's also in rows where input had '.'? Let's test. Input columns (0-index): col0: row0 '.'; row1 '.'; row2 '.'; row3 '.'; row4 'X'; row5 '.' => contains X, so column should be azure in output. Output size 12x12, each original column expands to two columns? Since double dimensions, each original cell becomes 2x2 block? But description: "map is reproduced in a 2×2 tactical display." Means output is 2x scaling both dimensions, replicating each cell into 2x2 block? However output shows pattern not simple replication because azure columns appear across both tiles. Let's examine output first few rows: Row0: "A X . . . A A X . . . A". That's 12 entries. Let's split into two tiles horizontally? Maybe each tile is 6x6 (original size) and they are placed side by side, and also vertically duplicated, making 12x12 with four copies of transformed 6x6 grid. Let's check: The transformed 6x6 grid would have azure columns where flare present, else black, with flares staying X. Let's compute transformed 6x6. Original 6x6 grid with X at (0,1?) Wait input row0: ". X . . . ." So row0 col1 X. Row4: "X . . . . X" so X at (4,0) and (4,5). That's all. Now apply rule: columns with any X are col0, col1, col5. Those columns become azure A, except X cells remain X. Other columns (2,3,4) become black '.'. Thus transformed 6x6 grid would be: Rows: 0: col0 A? original '.' but column 0 has X elsewhere, so A. col1 X (keep). col2 . col3 . col4 . col5 A (since column5 has X elsewhere, but original '.' -> A). So row0: A X . . . A Row1: original all '.'; columns 0,1,5 become A. So: A A . . . A Row2: same: A A . . . A Row3: same: A A . . . A Row4: original X . . . . X ; column0 X stays X, column1 A (since column1 has X elsewhere), col2 . col3 . col4 . col5 X (keep). So: X A . . . X Row5: all '.' -> A A . . . A That matches the first 6 rows of output? Let's compare output rows 0-5: Row0: "A X . . . A A X . . . A" That's 12 columns. If we split into two 6-col tiles: first 6: A X . . . A matches our transformed row0. Second 6: A X . . . A again same. So output row0 is two copies side by side. Row1: "A A . . . A A A . . . A" first 6: A A . . . A matches row1. second 6: A A . . . A ... [2161 chars truncated]
"A few costumed actors stand on a dark stage. The spotlight operator floods each occupied wing with azure light, though the actors' costumes still show their true colors. The scene is then projected onto four backdrop panels."
120b: k=2
See: A dark stage with a few brightly costumed actors at scattered positions.
Do: Flood every wing containing an actor with azure spotlight; actors keep their costume color. Empty wings stay dark. Project the scene onto a 2×2 arrangement of panels.
Grid: Output is double width and height, four copies of the spotlit stage.
We need to infer rule. From description: "dark stage" = black '.' maybe. "actors" are brightly costumed actors at scattered positions: colored cells (non '.' and non X?). In examples, input includes '.' and X and maybe other colors? Example1 input grid 6x6 with '.' and X only. Output is 12x12 (double width and height). Output shows many A (azure) and X preserved? Let's examine.
Input1: positions of X at (0,1) and (4,0) and (4,5). Output: appears to have pattern where each original cell becomes a 2x2 block? Actually output size double each dimension, so each input cell maps to 2x2 block. Let's test: Input cell (0,0) is '.' (black). Output top-left 2x2 block (rows0-1, cols0-1) are A and A? Wait output first row: "A X . . . A A X . . . A". That's 12 columns. Let's map: Input row0: ". X . . . .". So 6 cells. For each cell produce 2 columns. So columns 0-1 correspond to input (0,0) '.' => output columns 0-1 are "A X"? That's not uniform. Hmm maybe transformation is more complex: "Flood every wing containing an actor with azure spotlight; actors keep their costume color. Empty wings stay dark. Project the scene onto a 2×2 arrangement of panels. Output is double width and height, four copies of the spotlit stage."
Interpretation: "wing" maybe row or column? "Flood every wing containing an actor with azure spotlight" meaning fill entire row and column (like wings) that contain an actor (non '.'?) with azure A, but keep actors' original color (X). Empty wings (rows/cols without any actor) stay black '.'.
Then "Project the scene onto a 2×2 arrangement of panels" meaning replicate the transformed grid 2x2 (i.e., tile it 2 times horizontally and vertically) resulting in double width and height (since each dimension doubled). So output is 2x tiling of the transformed grid.
Let's test with example1.
First compute transformed grid (same size as input 6x6) where rows/cols containing any X become A except X cells stay X. Input has X at (0,1), (4,0), (4,5). So rows with X: row0 and row4. Columns with X: col1, col0, col5.
Thus for each cell:
- If cell is X, keep X.
- Else if its row is in {0,4} OR its column in {0,1,5}, then set to A.
- Else keep '.' (black).
Let's compute transformed grid.
Create 6x6.
Row0: original ". X . . . ."
Columns: 0 '.' -> row0 is a wing, so becomes A (since row0 has actor). col0 also in column set, but anyway A. col1 is X keep X. col2 '.' row0 => A. col3 '.' => A. col4 '.' => A. col5 '.' column5 in set => A. So row0 transformed: A X A A A A.
Row1: original all '.'.
Check each column: col0 is in column set => A. col1 column set => A. col2 not row1 not in row set, col2 not column set => '.' . col3 '.' . col4 '.' . col5 column set => A. So row1: A A . . . A.
Row2: similar to row1 (row2 not in row set). So row2: A A . . . A.
Row3: same: A A . . . A.
Row4: original "X . . . . X"
Row4 is in row set, so all non-X become A. col0 is X keep X. col1 '.' column set also A. col2 '.' => A. col3 '.
... [5456 chars truncated]
"A few colored flowers are planted in rows of a dark garden bed. Wherever a flower takes root, its entire furrow is watered, turning the soil azure, while the bloom keeps its original hue. The garden is then reflected in a four-pane greenhouse window."
120b: k=1
See: Dark garden soil with a few colored flowers planted at scattered positions.
Do: Water every furrow (column) containing a flower, turning soil azure; flowers keep their color. Dry furrows stay dark. Display the garden as a 2×2 tiling.
Grid: Output doubles both dimensions with four identical garden tiles.
We need to infer rule. Input grid is some size? Example1 input appears 6x6? Let's count rows: given lines: ". X . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." ". . . . . ." "X . . . . X" ". . . . . ." That's 6 rows, 6 columns. Output is larger: appears 12x12 (double dimensions). Indeed output lines count 12 rows, each row length 12. The output seems to be tiling of 2x2 identical tiles? Actually description: "Display the garden as a 2×2 tiling. Grid details: Output doubles both dimensions with four identical garden tiles." So output is 2x2 tiling of transformed garden (maybe each tile is same as transformed original?). Let's examine output pattern. Take first tile (top-left 6x6?) Actually output 12x12, could be composed of four 6x6 blocks each identical. Let's check first 6 columns of first 6 rows correspond to something. Row1 output: "A X . . . A A X . . . A". That's 12 entries. Split into two 6-length halves: first half "A X . . . A", second half "A X . . . A". Row2: "A A . . . A A A . . . A" halves "A A . . . A" and "A A . . . A". So indeed each half identical. Similarly rows 1-6 vs rows7-12? Row7: "A X . . . A A X . . . A" same as row1. So 2x2 tiling of same 6x6 pattern. Thus transformation: Input 6x6 with '.' black and 'X' grey. Output 6x6 transformed: columns containing a flower (colored) become azure (A). In example, flowers are X? Wait X is grey in key. But description says colored flowers; maybe X is a flower? In example, input has X at (0,1) and (4,0) and (4,5). Those are grey cells. Output shows those X remain X, but other cells become A (azure) in columns that contain X. Let's verify: Input columns with X: column 0 has X at row4. column1 has X at row0. column5 has X at row4. So columns 0,1,5 are "furrows containing a flower". In output, all cells in those columns become A except where original X stays X? Let's check column0 in output (first column of 12? Actually after tiling, each tile column0 corresponds to original column0). Row1 col0 = A (original row0 col0 was .) Row2 col0 = A (original .) Row3 col0 = A etc. Row5 (original row4) col0 = X (original X stays X). So rule: For each column that has at least one non-black (i.e., colored flower) in input, set all cells in that column to azure (A) except preserve original colored cells (non-black) unchanged. Also columns without any flower remain black '.'? Let's check column2 (index2) original all '.'; output column2 is '.' across rows? Row1 col2 '.' yes. Row2 col2 '.' etc. So unchanged black. Thus transformation: For each column, if any cell is not '.' (i.e., any colored cell), then in output, that column becomes azure (A) for all cells that were '.'; original non-'.' cells keep their original color. Now test input: 4x4 grid. Rows: 0: ". . G ." 1: ". . . ." 2: ". . . G" 3: "G . . ." Colors: G = green. So columns with any G: column0 has G at row3. column2 has G at row0. column3 has G at row2. So columns 0,2,3 are "flower columns". Column1 has none. Thus output tile (same size as input ... [1341 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains a pattern made of three colors: azure (A) cells forming a shape, a single green (G) cell at the center of that shape, and one or more red (R) cells positioned among or adjacent to the azure cells. The azure cells surrounding the green cell define a template shape. The red cells mark target locations where copies of that template should be placed.
Do: 1. Locate the single green (G) cell — this is the origin of the template. 2. Identify all azure (A) cells and compute each one's offset relative to the green cell (row_offset, col_offset). This set of offsets defines the template shape. 3. Locate all red (R) cells — these are the stamp targets. 4. Start with a blank grid (all black/background). 5. For each red cell, stamp a copy of the template: for every offset in the template, place an azure cell at (red_row + offset_row, red_col + offset_col), provided it falls within the grid bounds. 6. The original pattern (all G, A, and R cells) is removed — only the stamped copies remain.
Grid: The grid dimensions match the input (typically 13×13). The background is black (.). The output contains only azure (A) cells on a black background — no green or red cells remain. The coordinate system is row, column with (0,0) at top-left.
"A rubber stamp carved around a missing center is pressed wherever ink drops have fallen."
120b: k=2
See: On a dark desk sits a rubber stamp carved from azure material. At its heart, where the handle meets the block, is a single green pivot point — the grip you hold it by. Scattered nearby are red ink drops splattered on the desk, each marking a spot where someone wants an impression.
Do: Lift the stamp off the desk by its green handle, removing it entirely from view. Now press the stamp down once onto each red ink drop — the red vanishes beneath the impression, and the azure carved pattern appears around where the drop was. The original stamp and all the ink drops disappear, leaving only the fresh impressions behind on the dark surface.
Grid: The desk is a dark field. Each stamped impression is rendered in azure. Nothing remains of the original stamp or the red ink drops — only the ghost-impressions left behind, perfectly reproducing the stamp's carved shape at every spot where ink once sat.
We need to understand the puzzle. The metaphor: a stamp (azure) with a green pivot point (handle). Red ink drops are positions where we need to stamp. The stamp shape is the azure pattern (A) with a green pivot point (G) at its handle. In input, we have a stamp shape (A's and a G) somewhere, plus red R's scattered. The rule: remove the original stamp and red drops, and place copies of the stamp (azure shape) centered at each red drop location, but with the green pivot point removed? Wait: In output examples, we see only azure A's, no G. Indeed output has only A's, no G. The original stamp (including G) disappears. The red R's disappear. The azure pattern appears at each location where a red R was, but the pattern is the same as the original stamp shape (the arrangement of A's relative to the G pivot). However, the output shows A's placed at positions that correspond to the original stamp shape but shifted so that the G (green) aligns with the original R location? Let's verify. Example 1 Input: Let's map coordinates. We'll index rows 0-12, columns 0-12. Input has A's forming a plus shape? Let's list coordinates of A's and G. Rows: Row3: col6 = A (since row index 3, column 6). Actually row3: ". . . . . . A . . . . . .". So A at (3,6). Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . .": A at (4,5),(4,6),(4,7). Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . .": A at (5,4) and (5,8). G at (5,6). R at (5,3) and (5,9). Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . .": A at (6,5),(6,6),(6,7). Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . .": A at (7,6). So the stamp shape is a cross of A's with a G at center? Let's see shape: coordinates relative to G at (5,6). Offsets: A at (3,6) offset (-2,0). Row4 A's at (4,5) (-1,-1), (4,6) (-1,0), (4,7) (-1,1). Row5 A at (5,4) (0,-2) and (5,8) (0,2). Row6 A's at (6,5) (1,-1), (6,6) (1,0), (6,7) (1,1). Row7 A at (7,6) (2,0). So shape is a diamond? Actually it's like a plus with arms length 2 horizontally and vertically, plus the four diagonal positions at distance sqrt(2) (the ones at (-1,-1), (-1,1), (1,-1), (1,1)). So shape includes 13 cells: center G, plus 12 A's? Wait count: A's: row3 (1), row4 (3), row5 (2), row6 (3), row7 (1) =10 A's. plus G =1 => total 11 cells. Actually we have 10 A's. Now output Example1: The output shows A's at positions where the stamp was placed at each red R location. There were two R's at (5,3) and (5,9). In output, we see A's forming the shape centered at those positions? Let's check output coordinates. Output rows: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . .": A at (3,3) and (3,9). That's two A's. Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . .": A at (4,2),(4,3),(4,4) and (4,8),(4,9),(4,10). Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A .": A at (5,1),(5,5),(5,7),(5,11). Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . .": A at (6,2),(6,3),(6,4) and (6,8),(6,9),(6,10). Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . .": A at (7,3) and (7,9). These correspond to two copies of the original A pattern, shifted so that the G (center) would be at the original R positions (5,3) and (5,9). Let's verify: For ... [7107 chars truncated]
"A virus carries its protein coat encoded around a dormant nucleus; wherever receptor sites glow on the membrane, the coat self-assembles anew, and the original virion dissolves."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cellular membrane with a single dormant nucleus surrounded by protein structures, and receptor sites marked nearby.
Do: The virus replicates its protein coat at each receptor site, arranging the same structure around each new anchor point, while the original virion disintegrates entirely.
Grid: Output grid matches input dimensions. Background is black. Only azure protein-coat cells remain at the replicated sites.
"An accretion disk orbits a dark singularity; wherever a nova flashes in the void, the disk's pattern reforms around the flash point, and the original black hole evaporates."
120b: fail
See: Matter arranged in a disk pattern around a dark center, with nova bursts appearing in surrounding space.
Do: Each nova seeds a new accretion disk with the same orbital structure. The original system vanishes.
Grid: Output shows only the new accretion disks (azure) against the void (black).
We need to infer rule. The description: "Matter arranged in a disk pattern around a dark center, with nova bursts appearing in surrounding space. Each nova seeds a new accretion disk with the same orbital structure. The original system vanishes. Output shows only the new accretion disks (azure) against the void (black)." So input contains patterns of colors: A azure is central? In examples, output only contains A's arranged in a disk pattern (like a plus shape?) Let's examine Example1. Input grid 13x13. There is a pattern: central region with A's and some R, G etc. Let's map coordinates. The pattern appears like a cross shape? Let's write coordinates (row, col) starting 0. Rows 3-7 have A's forming a diamond? Actually row3 col5 A (single). Row4 col4-6 A A A. Row5: col3 R, col4 A, col5 ?, col6 G, col7 ?, col8 A, col9 R. Wait row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." So A at col4, G at col6, A at col8. Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." A at col5-7. Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." A at col6. So shape: looks like a plus sign with center at (5,6?) Actually central A at row5 col4? Let's locate central? The pattern maybe a "disk" of A's around a center (maybe G). In input there is G at row5 col6 (0-index). That's the "dark center"? Actually description says dark center (black) but here G is green. Hmm. Output for Example1: Only A's appear, arranged similarly but shifted? Output rows 3-7 show A's pattern but with no other colors. Let's see output rows: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So there are two copies of the original disk pattern? Actually appears like two disks side by side horizontally. The original input had one disk (A's) with some other colors (R, G). Output shows two disks of A's, maybe each "nova" (R?) seeds a new disk. In input there were R's at positions (5,3) and (5,9) maybe? Actually row5 col3 R and col9 R. Also maybe other R's? Row5 also had R at col9. So two R's left and right of the central pattern. In output we see two disks of A's centered at those R positions? Let's check: Output shows A at row3 col3? Wait row3 col3 is A? Row3: positions: col0-12. Row3 has A at col3 and col9. Yes row3 col3 and col9. Row4 has A's at col2-4 and col8-10. Row5 has A at col1, col5, col7, col11? Actually row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." So A at col1, col5, col7, col11. Row6: A at col2-4 and col8-10. Row7: A at col3 and col9. Thus there are two identical patterns of A's centered at (5,5?) Wait first disk centered at column5? Let's compute center of left disk: pattern spans columns 1-5? Actually left disk A's positions: rows 3-7, columns 1-5 maybe. Center likely at (5,3)? Let's see left disk: row5 col5 is A (center?). Row5 col5 is A (since row5 col5 is the middle of left disk). That matches original R at (5,3) maybe? Not exactly. Let's map original R positions: (5,3) and (5,9). Output left disk center maybe at (5,5) ... [8629 chars truncated]
"A reef grows in formation around a deep sinkhole; wherever a buoy is anchored, the same coral pattern colonizes the seabed, and the original reef crumbles to sand."
120b: fail
See: Coral structures encircling a dark hole in the ocean floor, with buoys anchored at various positions.
Do: Coral replicates its formation at each buoy's anchor point. The source reef dissolves.
Grid: Only the new coral formations (azure) remain on the bare seabed (black).
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has a pattern of A (azure) forming a plus-like shape? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-12, cols 0-12. Input example1: There's a central A at (3,5). Then a horizontal line of three A at row4 cols5-7? Actually row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." positions (4,5),(4,6),(4,7). Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." So A at (5,4) and (5,8). Also A at (5,5?) Actually row5 col5 is A? Wait row5: pattern "R A . G . A". Let's write row5 columns: col0 '.' etc. At col3? Let's count: row5 string: ". . . R A . G . A R . . .". So col3=R, col4=A, col5='.', col6=G, col7='.', col8=A, col9=R. So A at (5,4) and (5,8). Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." A at (6,5-7). Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." A at (7,6). So overall shape looks like a diamond/plus shape of A with center at (5,5?) Actually there is no A at (5,5). The shape is like a ring? Let's visualize: coordinates of A: (3,5), (4,5-7), (5,4), (5,8), (6,5-7), (7,6). That's like a hollow diamond shape (a rotated square) with empty interior (positions (5,5) empty, (5,6) empty, (5,7) empty, (4,6) is A, etc). Also there are R at (5,3) and (5,9) and G at (5,6). So R and G are "buoys"? The description: coral replicates its formation at each buoy's anchor point. The source reef dissolves. Only new coral formations (azure) remain on bare seabed (black). So the original A shape disappears, and copies appear at each buoy location (R and G). In output, we see A's placed at positions relative to each buoy. Let's examine output example1: Output has A's at positions: row3 col3? Actually output row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So A at (3,3) and (3,9). Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." A at (4,2-4) and (4,8-10). Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." A at (5,1), (5,5), (5,7), (5,11). Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." A at (6,2-4) and (6,8-10). Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." A at (7,3) and (7,9). So indeed the original shape (centered at (5,5) originally) has been replicated at each buoy location: there were buoys at R at (5,3) and (5,9) and G at (5,6). The shape appears centered at each of those positions? Let's see: The shape's pattern relative to its center? Need to define shape's anchor point. Original shape's "center" maybe at (5,5) (the empty interior). The shape is a diamond of radius 2? Let's compute relative coordinates of A's in original shape relative to (5,5): positions: (-2,0) (row3 col5) ; (-1,-1) (4,4?) Actually A at (4,5) is (-1,0). Wait we have A at (4,5-7) includes (4,5) (-1,0), (4,6) (-1,1), (4,7) (-1,2). Also (5,4) (0,-1), (5,8) (0,3). (6,5-7) (1,0),(1,1),(1,2). (7,6) (2,1). Hmm not symmetric. Let's list all A coordinates: (3,5) (4,5),(4,6),(4,7) (5,4),(5,8) (6,5),(6,6),(6,7) (7,6) If we consider center at (5,6)? That would be (row5 col6) which is G originally. Not center. Let's compute relative to (5,6): positions: (-2,-1) (3,5), (-1,-1) (4,5), (-1,0) (4,6), (-1,1) (4,7), (0,-2) (5,4), (0,2) (5,8), (1,-1) (6,5), (1,0) (6,6), (1,1) (6,7), (2,0) (7,6). That's a ... [8497 chars truncated]
"A circuit traces paths around a dead socket; wherever a solder joint glows hot, the same circuit is etched onto the board, and the prototype is wiped clean."
120b: fail
See: Conductive traces routed around an unpowered socket, with hot solder joints marked on the PCB.
Do: Etch identical trace patterns at each solder joint, preserving the layout relative to the socket. Strip the original circuit.
Grid: Output shows only the new etched traces (azure) on a blank board (black).
We need to infer rule. From examples: Input contains pattern of A (azure) and other colors (R,G). Output shows only A's placed in new positions, original A's removed? Let's examine Example1. Input grid 13x13. There is a central pattern: looks like a plus shape of A with R at left/right of center? Actually lines: Row3 (0-index?) Let's index rows 0-12. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . . . . A . . . . . . ." Row7: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." Row8: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." Row9: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." Row10: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." Rows 11-12 empty. So pattern: a central cross of A's (like a plus) with R at left/right of top row? Actually row8 (index 8) has R at col3, A at col4, . at col5, G at col6, . at col7, A at col8, R at col9. So there are two R's flanking a central A with G between? Not exactly. Output shows only A's placed in a larger pattern: It seems they replicated the A pattern around each original A? Let's see output rows: Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row6: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." Row7: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row8: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." Row9: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row10: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So output shows A's placed at positions that correspond to original A's? Let's map coordinates. Original A positions (row, col) (0-index): Row6 col5? Actually row6 (index6) has A at col5? Let's count columns 0-12. Row6: ". . . . . A . . . . . . .": A at col5. Row7: ". . . . . A A A . . . . .": A at col5,6,7. Row8: ". . . R A . G . A R . . .": A at col4, col8. Row9: ". . . . . A A A . . . . .": A at col5,6,7. Row10: ". . . . . . A . . . . . .": A at col6. So shape is like a plus with arms length 2? Actually central column col5? Wait central column maybe col5? Let's list coordinates: (6,5) (7,5),(7,6),(7,7) (8,4),(8,8) (9,5),(9,6),(9,7) (10,6) That's like a diamond shape? Not symmetrical. Now output A positions: Row6 (index6) has A at col3 and col9? Actually row6 output: ". . . A . . . . . A . . .": A at col3 and col9. Row7: ". . A A A . . . A A A . .": A at col2,3,4 and col8,9,10. Row8: ". A . . . A . A . . . A .": A at col1,5,7,11. Row9: ". . A A A . . . A A A . .": A at col2,3,4 and col8,9,10. Row10: ". . . A . . . . . A . . .": A at col3 and col9. So output seems to be original pattern of A's but shifted left/right? Actually appears to be original pattern duplicated horizontally mirrored around central column? Let's compare: original A's at columns 4-8 region. Output A's at columns 1-11 region, with two groups left and right of a central gap? It looks like they took the original pattern and replicated it at each original R location? Wait original R's at (8,3) and (8,9). Output A's appear at columns 3 and 9 (row6) etc. So maybe rule: For each R (hot solder joint), copy the A pattern centered at that R, preserving relative layout, and then remov ... [9313 chars truncated]
"Runes are carved in a ring around a hollow altar stone; wherever a blood offering stains the earth, the same rune circle manifests, and the original shrine crumbles to dust."
120b: fail
See: Carved runes encircling an empty altar, with offering marks on the ground.
Do: Each offering site spawns an identical rune circle. The source shrine is destroyed.
Grid: Only the manifested rune circles (azure) remain on barren ground (black).
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. We have grid with colors: A azure, R red, G green, etc. Input shows a pattern: a central "shrine" maybe a cross of A with R and G? In example1 input: there is a plus shape? Let's map coordinates. Example1 input: 13x13. At rows (0-index). Row3 col5 = A (since row3: ". . . . . A . . . . . . .") Actually row3 col5? Let's index columns 0-12. Row3: positions: col5 = A. Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => col5,6,7 = A. Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." => col3=R, col4=A, col5='.', col6=G, col7='.', col8=A, col9=R. Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => col5-7 A. Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => col6 A. So pattern looks like a "rune circle": a ring of A around a central G? Actually central maybe G at (5,6). Surrounding A in a plus shape? Let's visualize: coordinates (row, col). Center G at (5,6). Surrounding A at (3,5), (4,5-7), (5,4), (5,8), (6,5-7), (7,6). That's like a diamond shape? Actually forms a circle of radius 2? It's like a pattern of A forming a ring around G, with R at two positions (5,3) and (5,9) maybe "offering sites"? In output, those R disappear, and new A appear at positions where R were? Let's see output example1: Output shows A at positions where previously R were? Output rows: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9? Wait row3 output: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." That's row3 (index3). In input row3 had A at col5 only. Output row3 has A at col3 and col9. Those correspond to positions of R in row5? Not same row. Let's examine output pattern: It seems the original A ring is replicated at two new locations, offset left and right, and the original ring is removed? Actually output shows multiple A circles: one centered at (5,4?) Let's map output example1: Row3 col3 = A, row4 col2-4 = A A A, row5 col1 = A, col5? Wait row5 output: " . A . . . A . A . . . A ." Let's write row5 (index5) output: ". A . . . A . A . . . A .". So A at col1, col5, col7, col11. Row6 output: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at col2-4 and col8-10. Row7 output: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9. So there are two identical circles of A (same shape as original) placed left and right of original location, with original removed. The circles are centered at positions where R were? Original R at (5,3) and (5,9). Those are left and right of center G. Indeed circles appear centered at those R positions? Let's check: The original circle had center G at (5,6). The new circles appear centered at (5,3) and (5,9) (the R positions). In output, at those centers there is no G (they are black). The circles consist of A only (no G). So rule: For each R (red) adjacent to the central pattern? The R are "offering sites". Each offering site spawns an identical rune circle (the A ring) and the source shrine (original circle) is destroyed. So we copy the pattern of A ring (including its shape) to each R location, removing original. In example2: Input shows a small cross shape? Let's map. In ... [9551 chars truncated]
"Dancers freeze in tableau around an absent partner's empty space; wherever a rose is thrown onto the floor, the same tableau reforms, and the original pose breaks apart."
120b: fail
See: Dancers arranged around an empty spot on the dance floor, with roses tossed to various locations.
Do: At each rose, dancers reassemble in the identical arrangement. The original tableau dissolves.
Grid: Output contains only the reformed dancer positions (azure) on an empty floor (black).
We need to infer rule. From example: Input grid has azure A, red R, green G. Output only azure A positions, arranged around empty spot? Let's examine example. Input size 13x13. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input A pattern: looks like a plus shape? Let's list A positions: Row3 col5? Actually row3 (0-index) line: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." Wait row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." Actually given: row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ."? Let's re-read example input lines: Example 1 Input lines: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . . . . A . . . . . . . 5: . . . . . A A A . . . . . 6: . . . R A . G . A R . . . 7: . . . . . A A A . . . . . 8: . . . . . . A . . . . . . 9-13 all dots. Let's index rows 0-12. Row3 (index3) has A at col5? Actually row4 line: ". . . . . A . . . . . . ." So col5 (0-index) = A. Row4 (index4): ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at col5,6,7. Row5 (index5): ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." => R at col3, A at col4, G at col6? Wait positions: columns: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." So col3=R, col4=A, col5='.', col6=G, col7='.', col8=A, col9=R. Row6 (index6): ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at col5,6,7. Row7 (index7): ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => A at col6? Wait there are 6 dots then A then rest. So col6 = A. Thus A forms a diamond shape? Let's map coordinates: (3,5) (4,5)(4,6)(4,7) (5,4) (5,8) (6,5)(6,6)(6,7) (7,6) Also there are A at (5,4) and (5,8) are left/right arms. So shape is like a hollow diamond? Actually shape resembles a plus with extra corners? Let's visualize: It's like a rotated square (diamond) of size 3? The pattern of A forms a shape of a "X"? Wait. Now output: Only A's appear, but repositioned? Output lines: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So output A positions are now at two mirrored copies? It seems the original A shape is duplicated and placed at two locations symmetric around something (maybe the original R positions?). In input there were two R at (5,3) and (5,9). In output, A appear at columns 3 and 9? Let's check. Output row5 (index5) has A at col1? Wait row5 output: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." Let's count: positions: col0='.', col1='A', col2='.', col3='.', col4='.', col5='A', col6='.', col7='A', col8='.', col9='.', col10='.', col11='A', col12='.' So A at cols1,5,7,11. Original A shape width 5? The original shape spanned columns 4-8 (col4 to col8). In output, there are two copies: one shifted left, one shifted right. The left copy seems centered at col3? Let's compute left copy coordinates: maybe original shape centered at col6 (since diamond). Left copy appears centered at col3? Right copy at col9? Indeed original R positions at col3 and col9 maybe act as centers for duplication. Thus rule: For each "rose" (R) in input, copy the pattern of A (the da ... [8967 chars truncated]
"Crystal lattices radiate from a hollow geode center; wherever magma vents breach the surface, the same crystalline pattern solidifies, and the mother geode shatters."
120b: fail
See: A crystal structure growing around an empty geode cavity, with magma vents breaking through nearby.
Do: Each vent produces an identical crystal lattice in the same geometry. The original geode is destroyed.
Grid: Only the new crystal formations (azure) remain on bare rock (black).
We need to infer rule. Look at examples. We have grid with colors: A azure, R red, G green, etc. Input shows a pattern: a central shape maybe a cross? Output shows multiple copies of that shape placed symmetrically? Let's analyze Example1. Input grid size 13x13. There's a pattern: a plus shape? Let's map coordinates. I'll index rows 0-12, columns 0-12. Input example1: At row3 col5 = A (since row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Wait row3 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Actually row3 is ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Let's read: Example1 Input lines: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . (but they show ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Wait they have ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Actually row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Let's re-check: Example1 Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." But they show some A, R, G etc. Let's copy exactly: Example 1 Input: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . But the given includes A etc. Let's re-read the problem statement: Example 1 Input lines: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." But the description includes A etc. Something off. Possibly formatting lost. Let's reconstruct from given: Example 1 Input lines (as in problem): ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." But they show A etc. Actually the Input lines in problem statement for Example1 are: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . ... [8504 chars truncated]
"A cookie cutter is shaped by the dough left around a cherry pressed into its center; wherever drops of jam land on the baking sheet, the cutter stamps out identical pastries, and the original dough is scraped away."
120b: k=1
See: A sheet of dough with a cherry at the center defining the cutter's shape, and drops of jam scattered on the tray.
Do: Press the cutter at each jam spot, leaving identical dough shapes. Remove the original piece along with the cherry and jam.
Grid: Output grid is all black except for azure dough shapes stamped at each former jam location.
We need to infer rule. From description: "sheet of dough with a cherry at the center defining the cutter's shape, and drops of jam scattered on the tray. Press the cutter at each jam spot, leaving identical dough shapes. Remove the original piece along with the cherry and jam. Output grid is all black except for azure dough shapes stamped at each former jam location." Interpretation: Input has a "cutter" shape defined by a central "cherry" (maybe a specific color) and surrounding shape (dough). The jam spots are other colors? In example, input shows azure A shapes around a red R and green G? Let's examine example 1. Input grid: there is an azure shape (A) forming a plus-like shape? Let's map coordinates. The pattern: At row3 (0-index?), but easier: The shape appears centered at (row5, col5?) Let's list rows (0-index). Row0-2 all dots. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Actually row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Wait example input row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." No, row3 is line with ". . . . . . . . . . . . ."? Let's recount: Provided input lines: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . . . . . A . . . . . . . Row5: . . . . . A A A . . . . . Row6: . . . R A . G . A R . . . Row7: . . . . . A A A . . . . . Row8: . . . . . . A . . . . . . Row9-12 all dots. So there is a central pattern: At row6 col3 is R (red), row6 col4 is A, col5 is ., col6 is G, col7 is ., col8 is A, col9 is R. So there are two reds left and right, a green in middle? Actually green at col6? Wait col6 is G. So pattern: R A . G . A R horizontally. Also there is a plus shape of A's around that? Let's see: Row4 col5 A (above center). Row5 col4-6 A A A (horizontal). Row6 col4 A (center left of green?), row6 col8 A (right). Row7 col4-6 A A A (horizontal). Row8 col5 A (below). So shape of A's forms a diamond? Actually looks like a 5x5 plus shape with center at (row6,col5?) Let's locate center: The central A at row6 col4? Wait row6 col4 is A (since row6: . . . R A . G . A R . . .). So at col4 is A. The green at col6. The red at col3 and col9? Actually col9 is R. So the shape of A's is like a "cutter" shape maybe defined by the pattern of A's (azure). The cherry maybe the red? Or green? The description: "sheet of dough with a cherry at the center defining the cutter's shape". So the cutter shape is defined by a central cherry (maybe a distinct color) and the surrounding dough (azure). In example, the central cherry could be the green G? Or maybe the red R? But there are two reds. The central piece maybe the green G (unique color among A's). The shape of A's around it forms a pattern (like a cross). The jam spots are other colors? In example, there are two reds at left and right of the shape, maybe jam spots? Output shows azure shapes at those jam spots. Let's examine output: Output grid shows azure A's placed at positions where reds were? Output rows: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." R ... [9684 chars truncated]
"A chord is voiced by the notes ringing around a silent root; wherever a fermata appears in the score, the chord is restruck in the same voicing, and the original passage is erased from the manuscript."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A cluster of sounding notes arranged around a silent root note, with fermata marks elsewhere in the score.
Do: At each fermata, rewrite the chord with identical intervals relative to the new position. Erase the original cluster entirely.
Grid: Output contains only the restruck chords (azure) on an otherwise empty staff (black background).
"A team drills a formation around their captain's position; wherever the coach drops a cone on the field, the players replicate that exact formation, and the practice huddle disperses."
120b: k=2
See: Players arrayed in formation around a captain, with cones placed at various spots on the field.
Do: Each cone becomes the new center for the formation. Players clone themselves at each cone maintaining their relative positions. The original huddle clears.
Grid: Only the replicated player positions (azure) remain on the empty field (black).
We need to understand the transformation rule. We have grid with colors: A azure, R red, G green, etc. Input examples show pattern: there is a central formation of A's with some other colors (R, G) maybe representing "players" and "cones"? The description: Players arrayed in formation around a captain, with cones placed at various spots on the field. Each cone becomes the new center for the formation. Players clone themselves at each cone maintaining their relative positions. The original huddle clears. Only the replicated player positions (azure) remain on the empty field (black). So output only azure A's appear, at positions that are translations of the original formation relative to each cone location. Thus input contains a pattern of A's (players) arranged around a central point (captain?) maybe the central A? And there are other colors (R, G) representing cones? In example 1, input shows a plus-shaped cluster of A's with R at two positions left and right? Let's examine. Example1 Input grid (13x13). Let's map coordinates (row, col). I'll index rows 0-12, cols 0-12. Rows with data: Row3: col5 A (since row3: ". . . . . A . . . . . . .") Actually row3: ". . . . . A . . . . . . .". So A at (3,5). Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at (4,5),(4,6),(4,7) Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." => R at (5,3), A at (5,4), G at (5,6), A at (5,8), R at (5,9) Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at (6,5),(6,6),(6,7) Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => A at (7,6) So the formation of A's looks like a diamond shape? Let's plot coordinates relative to a center maybe at (5,6)? Actually there is a G at (5,6) which is not A. The A's form a shape around that G? Let's list A positions: (3,5), (4,5-7), (5,4), (5,8), (6,5-7), (7,6). That's like a hollow diamond shape with missing center (5,6) which is G. Also there are R's at (5,3) and (5,9) maybe representing cones? In output, we see A's placed at new positions: output shows A's at positions that correspond to original A pattern shifted to each cone location? Let's see output A positions: Output grid (same size). Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at (3,3) and (3,9). Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (4,2-4) and (4,8-10). Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." => A at (5,1), (5,5), (5,7), (5,11). Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (6,2-4) and (6,8-10). Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at (7,3) and (7,9). So the pattern of A's appears twice, centered at two positions: one around (5,3?) Actually first cluster appears around left side: positions roughly columns 2-4 etc. Let's compute relative to leftmost cone maybe at (5,3) which is R in input. The output cluster left side seems centered at (5,3)? Let's see: The original A pattern relative coordinates: Let's define pattern coordinates relative to some origin (maybe the G location (5,6) which is the "captain"?). Original A positions relative to (5,6): (3,5) => (-2,-1). (4,5) (-1,-1). (4,6) (-1,0). (4,7) (-1,1). ... [8269 chars truncated]
"A cyclone's spiral arms whirl around a calm eye; wherever lightning strikes the plain, the same spiral pattern crystallizes in frost, and the original storm dissipates."
120b: fail
See: A storm pattern with a calm eye at center and cloud bands radiating outward, with lightning strikes on the ground.
Do: At each lightning strike, frost traces the storm's spiral pattern around the strike point. The original storm vanishes completely.
Grid: Output shows only frost patterns (azure) centered on former strike points, on clear ground (black).
We need to infer rule. Input has colors: A azure, R red, G green. Output only shows A azure and . black. In example, original A pattern (storm) disappears, replaced by new A patterns centered on R positions? Let's examine example1. Input grid 13x13. Let's locate R positions: In example1 input, there are R at (row5,col2?) Let's index rows starting 0. Actually row5 (0-index) line: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." That's row5 (0-index 5). So R at col3 and col9 (0-index). Also maybe other R? No other R. A pattern: there is a plus-like shape? Let's map coordinates of A in input: Row3 col5? Actually row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." (row3 col4). Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." (row4 col5,6,7). Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." (row5 col4, col8). Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." (row6 col5,6,7). Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." (row7 col6). So shape is like a diamond/spiral? Actually looks like a small plus with center at (row5,col6?) Wait center maybe at (row5,col6) which is '.'? Actually row5 col6 is '.' (since row5: R at col3, A at col4, '.' at col5, G at col6, '.' at col7, A at col8). So center is G at (5,6). So G is the "eye"? In description: calm eye at center. So G is eye. A is storm cloud. R are lightning strikes. Output shows A patterns centered on former strike points (R). Let's see output: At positions where R were, we have new A patterns radiating outward in a spiral pattern? Let's examine output around first R (row5,col3). Output rows: row3? Actually output row3 (index3) has ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So at row3 col3? Wait row3 col3 is A? Let's map. Output grid same size. Let's list coordinates of A in output. Row3 (index3): ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9. Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at cols2,3,4 and cols8,9,10. Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." => A at col1, col5, col7, col11. Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at cols2,3,4 and 8,9,10. Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9. These form two identical patterns centered at (row5,col3) and (row5,col9). Indeed pattern is a 5x5 diamond? Let's see shape: coordinates relative to center (0,0) at (row5,col3). The pattern includes positions: (0,0)?? Actually at center (row5,col3) there is A? In output row5 col3 is '.'? Wait row5 col3 is index? Row5 line: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." columns: 0 '.' 1 A 2 '.' 3 '.' 4 '.' 5 A 6 '.' 7 A 8 '.' 9 '.' 10 '.' 11 A 12 '.' . So at col3 it's '.' not A. So center is not A. The pattern seems like a ring around center? Let's compute relative positions where A appear around (5,3). Offsets: (row3,col3) offset (-2,0) A. (row4,col2-4) offsets (-1,-1) (-1,0) (-1,1) A. (row5,col1) offset (0,-2) A. (row5,col5) offset (0,2) A. (row5,col7) offset (0,4)?? That's far. Wait maybe pattern is two concentric squares? Let's examine more systematically. Better: The pattern appears to be a "spiral" shape: Starting from top of center go down, right, down, left, down, left, up, left, up, right, up, right, down ... [9303 chars truncated]
"A blueprint traces the walls around an empty courtyard; wherever a cornerstone is laid across the lot, the same blueprint is built in miniature, and the drafting table is cleared."
120b: fail
See: Walls sketched around an open courtyard on a blueprint, with cornerstones placed at various building sites.
Do: Construct the blueprint's layout at each cornerstone location, preserving all wall positions relative to the courtyard center. Discard the original plans.
Grid: Output grid shows only constructed walls (azure) at each cornerstone site against vacant land (black).
We need to infer rule. Input has various colors; output only azure A and black . . In example, input had A, R, G etc. Output shows A placed at positions relative to some "cornerstones". The description: walls sketched around an open courtyard on a blueprint, with cornerstones placed at various building sites. Construct blueprint's layout at each cornerstone location, preserving all wall positions relative to courtyard center. Discard original plans. Output shows only constructed walls (azure) at each cornerstone site against vacant land (black). Interpretation: There is a pattern (a shape) made of A's (azure) in input? Actually in example input, there is a central pattern of A's with some R and G inside. Output shows A's placed at multiple locations: appears to be the original A pattern duplicated at positions of R? Let's examine. Example input grid size 13x13. Let's map coordinates (row, col) 0-index. Input A positions: Row3 col5? Actually row3 (0-index) line: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." Wait row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." Actually given: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ."? Let's read: Example input row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ."? Wait original: Row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ."? Let's copy from problem: Example 1 Input lines: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13: . . . . . . . . . . . . . But actual given earlier: Let's re-evaluate: Example 1 Input: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." But that's not matching description. Actually the example input includes A, R, G etc. Let's copy from problem statement: Example 1: Input: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . A A A . . . . . . . . R A . G . A R . . . . . . . . A A A . . . . . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... So rows 0-12. Let's index. Row0: all . Row1: all . Row2: all . Row3: ". . . . . A . . . . . . ." Actually there is A at col5? Let's count: positions: columns 0-12. Row3: columns: 0 .,1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 A,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 .,11 .,12 . So A at (3,5). Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at (4,5),(4,6),(4,7). Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." => R at (5,3), A at (5,4), . at (5,5), G at (5,6), . at (5,7), A at (5,8), R at (5,9). Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at (6,5),(6,6),(6,7). Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => A at (7,6). ... [8475 chars truncated]
"Trenches are dug in formation around a command bunker; wherever signal flares burst, the same trench pattern is entrenched anew, and the original position is abandoned."
120b: k=1
See: A network of trenches surrounding a central bunker, with signal flares marking new positions.
Do: At each flare, sappers dig the identical trench layout. The original fortification is leveled and left barren.
Grid: Only the newly dug trench networks (azure) remain on featureless terrain (black).
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid shows a pattern: central shape of A (azure) with some other colors R and G inside. Output shows only azure shapes, but relocated? Let's examine example1. Input coordinates (0-index). Let's map. I'll write rows 0-12, columns 0-12. Input has A at (3,5). Also a cross shape? Let's list A positions: Row3 col5 = A Row4 col5,6,7 = A A A (positions (4,5),(4,6),(4,7)) Row5: pattern "R A . G . A R" at columns? Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . .". So A at col4? Wait indexing: row5 col0-12. Let's count: col0 '.';1 '.';2 '.';3 'R';4 'A';5 '.';6 'G';7 '.';8 'A';9 'R';10 '.';11 '.';12 '.'. So A at (5,4) and (5,8). Also there is A at (5,5?) No it's '.'. Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => A at (6,5),(6,6),(6,7) Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => A at (7,6) So overall shape looks like a diamond? Let's plot coordinates relative to center maybe (5,6) is central? Actually there is G at (5,6) (green) inside shape. R at (5,3) and (5,9). So shape of A forms a ring around G? Let's see positions of A: (3,5); (4,5,6,7); (5,4,8); (6,5,6,7); (7,6). That's like a hollow diamond shape (a rotated square) with center at (5,6) which is G. The R's are left and right of shape at (5,3) and (5,9) maybe "signal flares". The description: network of trenches surrounding a central bunker, with signal flares marking new positions. At each flare, sappers dig identical trench layout. The original fortification is leveled and left barren. Only newly dug trench networks (azure) remain on featureless terrain (black). So rule: For each R (red) in input, we copy the pattern of A (azure) shape (the trench network) centered at that R? Actually output shows A's at positions corresponding to original shape but shifted to each R location? Let's examine output. Output grid shows A's at positions: Row3 col3? Let's list output A positions. Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at (3,3) and (3,9) Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (4,2),(4,3),(4,4) and (4,8),(4,9),(4,10) Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." => A at (5,1),(5,5),(5,7),(5,11) Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (6,2),(6,3),(6,4) and (6,8),(6,9),(6,10) Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at (7,3) and (7,9) So indeed there are two copies of the original A pattern, centered at the two R positions (5,3) and (5,9). The original A pattern (the "trench network") is the shape of A's around G. In output, the original pattern is removed (original A's gone) and replaced by copies at each R location. Also the G (green) disappears (since only azure remain). So rule: Identify the pattern formed by A (azure) in input (the "template"). Then for each occurrence of a specific marker color (maybe R), place a copy of that pattern centered at that marker's location, preserving orientation (same shape). Remove original pattern and other colors, leaving only the copies of A (azure) on black background. Check: The pattern's center is at G (green) originally. In output, th ... [5652 chars truncated]
"Actors hold their blocking marks around an empty spotlight; wherever a stage manager tapes a new X on the floor, the ensemble re-forms in the same arrangement, and the rehearsal positions are struck."
120b: k=1
See: Performers positioned around a central spotlight with tape marks placed elsewhere on the stage.
Do: The cast clones their relative positions at each tape mark. Original blocking is cleared from the stage.
Grid: Output shows only the repositioned cast (azure) on a bare stage (black).
We need to infer rule. From example: Input has A azure, R red, G green. Output only azure A placed at new positions, others cleared. The description: performers around central spotlight with tape marks elsewhere. Cast clones their relative positions at each tape mark. Original blocking cleared. So there is a central pattern (cast) of azure? In input, azure forms a plus shape? Let's examine example input grid coordinates (13x13). Let's map positions of A. Input lines (0-index rows). Row3 col5? Actually row3 (0-index) line: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." Wait row3: ". . . . A . . . . . . . ." (since row index 3). Row4: ". . . . A A A . . . . . ." Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." So azure pattern is like a diamond? Let's list coordinates (row,col) where A appears: Row3 col4 (0-index) Row4 col4,5,6 Row5 col4, col8? Actually row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." So A at col4 and col8. Row6 col5,6,7? Wait row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." So A at col5,6,7. Row7 col6? row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." So A at col6. So shape is like a rotated square? It's like a plus with arms length 2? Actually coordinates: (3,4); (4,4-6); (5,4,8); (6,5-7); (7,6). That's not symmetric. Maybe the central spotlight is the G green at (5,6?) Actually G at row5 col6? Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." So G at col6 (0-index). That's central? The azure pattern surrounds G? Let's see relative positions of A to G: G at (5,6). A positions relative: (3,4) diff (-2,-2); (4,4) diff (-1,-2); (4,5) diff (-1,-1); (4,6) diff (-1,0); (5,4) diff (0,-2); (5,8) diff (0,2); (6,5) diff (1,-1); (6,6) diff (1,0); (6,7) diff (1,1); (7,6) diff (2,0). That's like a pattern of A's around G but missing some positions: missing (-2,0), (-2,2), (-1,2), (0,-1), (0,1), (1,2), (2,-2), (2,-1), (2,1), (2,2). So not full. Now output shows A's at new positions: Let's list output A coordinates: Row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9? Wait row3 output: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So col3 and col9. Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at col2,3,4 and col8,9,10. Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." => A at col1,5,7,11. Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at col2,3,4 and col8,9,10. Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at col3 and col9. So pattern is same shape but shifted? Compare input shape coordinates relative to something else. It seems the pattern of A's is duplicated at two locations: left side and right side symmetrical about center column? Indeed output shows two clusters of A's: one cluster left side (columns 2-4 etc) and another cluster right side (columns 8-10 etc). In input there was only one cluster left side plus some isolated A's at (5,8) and (7,6) maybe representing tape marks? Actually there were A's at (5,8) and (7,6) which are right side of G. So maybe the tape marks are the red R positions? In input there are R at (5,0?) Actually row5 has R at col0? Wait row5 line: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ... [6020 chars truncated]
"Hedges grow in a topiary frame around a bare pedestal; wherever a gardener plants a seed flag, the same topiary sprouts, and the mother hedge withers to mulch."
120b: fail
See: Shaped hedges surrounding an empty pedestal, with seed flags stuck into the soil nearby.
Do: At each flag, identical topiary emerges in the same arrangement relative to the flag. The original topiary decomposes.
Grid: Only the new topiaries (azure) stand in the otherwise empty garden (black).
We need to infer rule. From description: "Shaped hedges surrounding an empty pedestal, with seed flags stuck into the soil nearby. At each flag, identical topiary emerges in the same arrangement relative to the flag. The original topiary decomposes. Grid details: Only the new topiaries (azure) stand in the otherwise empty garden (black)." So input contains some pattern of A (azure) plus other colors (R,G etc). Output only contains A's placed at positions relative to flags? Flags maybe R? In examples, input has R and G etc. Output shows A's arranged in pattern around each R? Let's examine. Example1 input: there is a central pattern of A's with R at two positions left/right of central? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-12, cols 0-12. Input example1: row3 col5 = A? Actually row3 (0-index) line: ". . . . . A . . . . . . ." So at (3,5) A. Row4: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => (4,5),(4,6),(4,7) A. Row5: ". . . R A . G . A R . . ." => (5,3) R, (5,4) A, (5,6) G, (5,8) A, (5,9) R. Row6: ". . . . . A A A . . . . ." => (6,5,6,7) A. Row7: ". . . . . . A . . . . . ." => (7,6) A. So there is a shape of A's forming a plus-like shape with a hole? Actually looks like a diamond? Let's view pattern of A's: coordinates relative to center maybe (5,5) is A. Surrounding A's at (4,5-7), (5,4,8), (6,5-7), (3,5), (7,6). That's like a shape of a "topiary" maybe. R's at (5,3) and (5,9) left and right of shape. G at (5,6) inside? Actually G at (5,6) which is between the two R's? Wait (5,6) is column 6 (0-index). The shape's center maybe (5,5) A, (5,8) A etc. G at (5,6) is between A at (5,5) and A at (5,8). So G is inside shape. Output example1: only A's appear, no R,G. The A's are placed at positions that were previously empty but correspond to pattern around each R? Let's see output coordinates: Row3 col3 = A? Actually output row3: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." So A at (3,3) and (3,9). Row4: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (4,2,3,4) and (4,8,9,10). Row5: ". A . . . A . A . . . A ." => A at (5,1), (5,5), (5,7), (5,11). Row6: ". . A A A . . . A A A . ." => A at (6,2,3,4) and (6,8,9,10). Row7: ". . . A . . . . . A . . ." => A at (7,3) and (7,9). So pattern of A's appears duplicated left and right of original shape, shifted outward by 2 columns? Original shape centered around column 5-7 region. Output shows two copies: one left side centered at col3-5? Actually left copy columns 2-4 maybe. Right copy columns 8-10. So the original shape (the A pattern) has been replicated at each R location? R's were at (5,3) and (5,9). The new A shapes appear centered around those R positions? Let's see left R at (5,3). In output, there is A at (5,1) and (5,5) etc. The shape around left R seems to be same as original shape but centered at (5,3)? Let's compute original shape coordinates relative to its center? Need to define shape: In input, the A pattern maybe centered at (5,5) (the central A). Let's list relative coordinates of A's in input (relative to ... [9121 chars truncated]
See: The input grid is composed of 2×2 colored blocks arranged in a regular grid pattern, separated by single-cell-wide black (.) borders. One color serves as the dominant background, appearing far more frequently than the others. The remaining minority colors each appear in one or more 2×2 block positions scattered among the background blocks.
Do: 1. Identify all distinct 2×2 colored blocks by scanning the grid at every position where blocks occur (they are spaced 3 cells apart both horizontally and vertically, starting at row 1, column 1). 2. Count the occurrences of each color across all block positions. 3. The color with the highest count is the background color — set it aside. 4. For each remaining minority color, record its count. 5. Sort the minority colors in descending order by count (most frequent first). 6. Output each minority color as a single row, one per line, from most frequent to least frequent.
Grid: The output grid is a single column with one row per minority color (typically 3 rows, 1 column). Each cell contains the color code of a minority color, ordered from most to least frequent. The input grid dimensions vary but always follow the pattern (2k+1) rows by (2m+1) columns, where k and m reflect the number of block rows and columns, with single-cell black borders separating all 2×2 blocks.
"A popularity contest among rare wildflowers in a vast meadow"
120b: k=1
See: A meadow stretches before you, tiled with patches of flowers. One species dominates the landscape so thoroughly it has become the grass itself — the wallpaper of the world. But scattered among this sea of sameness, a few rare wildflowers have taken root, their colors defiant against the monotony. Each flower bed is a small square plot, and the black soil paths between them form a quiet grid.
Do: The meadow keeper conducts an annual census of the rare species. She walks every plot, ignoring the common ground-cover entirely — it is invisible to her practiced eye. For each rare bloom she encounters, she places a tally mark in her notebook. When the walk is done, she ranks the rare species from most abundant to least, crowning the one closest to overtaking the meadow as the first name on her list. The rarest flower, barely clinging to existence, goes last.
Grid: The keeper's final report is a single column in her ledger — one flower color per line, written top to bottom from the most commonly spotted rarity down to the loneliest bloom in the field.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has many rows, with pattern: black '.' as background, and colored squares appear in 2x2 blocks? Let's examine Example 1 input (provided). Let's reconstruct mentally. Rows (I'll index): Row0: . . . . . . . . . . Row1: . G G . G G . G G . Row2: . . . . . . . . . . Row3: . B B . G G . G G . Row4: . . . . . . . . . . Row5: . G G . A A . G G . Row6: . . . . . . . . . . Row7: . G G . A A . G G . Row8: . . . . . . . . . . Row9: . G G . R R . R R . Row10: . . . . . . . . . . Row11: . R R . G G . G G . Row12: . . . . . . . . . . Output: R A B So output is a column listing colors: R, A, B (top to bottom). According to description: count rare species (non-dominant). The dominant species is the "wallpaper" i.e., the most common color? In example, which color is most frequent? Let's count occurrences of each color in input. We have colors: G, B, A, R. Let's count approximate: Each 2x2 block appears multiple times. Let's list blocks: Row1 has G G pairs at columns 1-2 and 4-5 and 7-8? Actually pattern . G G . G G . G G . So three 2x2? Actually each block is 2 cells horizontally, but vertical? The pattern repeats every other row with blank rows between. So each block is a 2x2 square of same color? Let's see rows 1 and 3 maybe form vertical pairs? Row1 has G G at positions (1,2), (4,5), (7,8). Row3 has B B at (1,2), G G at (4,5), G G at (7,8). So at columns 1-2, rows1-3 we have G on row1, B on row3, not same. So maybe each "plot" is a 2x2 block formed by two rows: rows1-2? But row2 is all dots. So maybe each plot is a 2x2 block formed by rows1 and 3? Not contiguous. Actually pattern: there are rows with colors, separated by empty rows. So each "plot" is a 1x2 horizontal pair? The description says "small square plot". Could be 2x2 but due to empty rows, they are separated. Let's examine: Row1 has G G . G G . G G . (positions). Row3 has B B . G G . G G . So there are three columns of pairs: first pair (col1-2) has G on row1, B on row3. So maybe each plot is a 2x2 formed by rows1 and 3 (with a blank row between). That would be a square of size 2 rows (with a blank row considered part of grid but not part of plot). So each plot consists of two colored rows separated by a blank row. So each plot is a 2x2 block of same color? Not exactly. But maybe the rule: Count each distinct color that appears in at least one 2x2 block (i.e., a "flower") and ignore the most common color (the "grass") which is considered background. Then output the remaining colors sorted by frequency descending. In example, output includes R, A, B. So G is omitted (most common). Let's verify counts: G appears many times (lots of G blocks). R appears maybe 2 blocks (row9 and row11). A appears 2 blocks (rows5 and7). B appears 1 block (row3). So order: R (most among rare), A (next), B (least). That matches output. Thus rule: Identify the most frequent color (excluding black '.'), treat it as background and ignore it. Then list other colors sorted ... [3036 chars truncated]
"A cell colony where the dominant species overwhelms the culture dish, but the researcher only cares about the rare mutations"
120b: k=1
See: A tissue sample teeming with identical cells arranged in a regular matrix, punctuated by clusters of mutant cells in different colorations. One cell type vastly outnumbers all others.
Do: Ignore the dominant colony entirely. Catalog each mutant strain by how many clusters it has formed. File your lab report listing the mutants from most prolific to least prolific, one per line.
Grid: The lab report is a single narrow column — one row per mutant strain, colored to match, ordered from the most widespread mutation at the top to the rarest at the bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has many rows with patterns: seems like 2x2 blocks? Let's examine example1 input (given). Let's rewrite in mind: It's a 13x10? Actually lines: appears 13 rows? Let's count: Input lines: 1 ". . . . . . . . . ." 2 ". G G . G G . G G ." 3 ". . . . . . . . . ." 4 ". B B . G G . G G ." 5 ". . . . . . . . . ." 6 ". G G . A A . G G ." 7 ". . . . . . . . . ." 8 ". G G . A A . G G ." 9 ". . . . . . . . . ." 10 ". G G . R R . R R ." 11 ". . . . . . . . . ." 12 ". R R . G G . G G ." 13 ". . . . . . . . . ." Output: R A B Interpretation: dominant color? The grid has many G clusters, also A, B, R. Need to count clusters of each non-dominant? The description: "One cell type vastly outnumbers all others. Ignore the dominant colony entirely. Catalog each mutant strain by how many clusters it has formed. File your lab report listing the mutants from most prolific to least prolific, one per line." Thus we need to find which color appears most frequently (by count of cells?) and ignore it. Then for each other color, count number of clusters (connected components). Then output colors sorted descending by number of clusters, each on its own line (single character). In example, output order: R, A, B. So R has most clusters, then A, then B. Let's verify counts. Need to define connectivity: likely orthogonal (4-direction) adjacency? The pattern shows clusters are 2x2 blocks? Let's examine positions: In example, G appears many times in 2x2 blocks separated by a dot column. For instance row2: ". G G . G G . G G .". That's three 2x2 blocks? Actually row2 only has G G pairs separated by dot. Row4 has ". B B . G G . G G .". So B appears in a 2x2 block at columns 2-3 rows4-5? Wait row5 is all dots, so B block maybe only 1 row? Actually pattern: each colored block appears as 2x2? Let's check rows 2 and 3? Row3 is all dots, so maybe blocks are 1x2? Hmm. Maybe clusters are 2x2 squares formed by two rows of same color separated by a dot row. For example, rows2 and 4? Not contiguous. Let's map coordinates: Use columns 1-10. Row2: col2 G, col3 G, col5 G, col6 G, col8 G, col9 G. Row4: col2 B, col3 B, col5 G, col6 G, col8 G, col9 G. Row6: col2 G, col3 G, col5 A, col6 A, col8 G, col9 G. Row8: same as row6. Row10: col2 G, col3 G, col5 R, col6 R, col8 R, col9 R. Row12: col2 R, col3 R, col5 G, col6 G, col8 G, col9 G. Thus each color appears in pairs of rows? For G: appears in rows2,4,6,8,10,12 at columns 2-3,5-6,8-9 etc. So many clusters maybe each 2x2 block formed by two adjacent rows with same columns? Let's see G at rows2 and 4: rows2 has G at col2-3, row4 has B at col2-3, not G. So not vertical adjacency. However G appears at rows2 and 4 at columns5-6 and 8-9. Row4 has G at those columns, so rows2 and 4 have G at same columns, but there is a dot row (row3) between them, so not adjacent. Thus clusters might be defined as contiguous via orthogonal adjacency ignoring gaps. So each colored cell is isolated? Actually G cells are adj ... [4513 chars truncated]
"An astronomer filtering out the background stars to catalog the unusual objects in a star field"
120b: k=1
See: A telescope's field of view divided into a grid of observation cells. Most cells contain the same common stellar classification. A few cells register objects of unusual spectral signatures — some signatures appearing in several cells, others just once or twice.
Do: Filter out the dominant stellar background. Catalog each anomalous spectral signature and count its occurrences across the field. Publish your findings listing anomalies from most frequently observed to rarest.
Grid: The published catalog is a single column, one spectral color per entry, ordered from the most common anomaly at top to the rarest at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid is larger with many rows, pattern: seems like 2x2 blocks? Let's examine Example1 input and output. Example1 input (looks like 13 rows? Actually lines show pattern). Let's rewrite quickly: It seems grid of 13 rows, each row length 10? Actually first line ". . . . . . . . . ." (10). Then second line ". G G . G G . G G ." etc. So pattern: rows alternate between empty rows (all .) and rows with pattern of two same colors repeated with . separators. The pattern appears in columns: positions 2-3 have G G, then dot, then G G, dot, G G, dot? Actually length 10: indices 0-9. Row2: ". G G . G G . G G ." => pattern: . G G . G G . G G . So three groups of G G separated by dots, ending with dot. Row4: ". B B . G G . G G ." Row6: ". G G . A A . G G ." Row8: ". G G . A A . G G ." Row10: ". G G . R R . R R ." Row12: ". R R . G G . G G ." So overall there are three distinct colors appearing in the "anomalous" cells: G, B, A, R? Actually G appears many times, B appears in row4 only, A appears rows6,8, R appears rows10,12. The output is: R A B So output lists colors (excluding G?) in order of frequency? Let's count occurrences of each color in the "non-dot" cells? Let's compute counts: For each row with pattern, there are 3 groups of two same colors = 6 cells per such row. Number of such rows: rows2,4,6,8,10,12 = 6 rows. So total non-dot cells = 6 rows *6 =36 cells. Now count each color: Row2: G appears 6 cells (3 groups of G G). So G count +6. Row4: B B (2), G G (2), G G (2) => B 2, G 4. So cumulative G 10, B 2. Row6: G G (2), A A (2), G G (2) => G +4 =14, A 2. Row8: same as row6 => G +4 =18, A +2 =4. Row10: G G (2), R R (2), R R (2) => G +2 =20, R +4. Row12: R R (2), G G (2), G G (2) => R +2 =6, G +4 =24. So final counts: G 24, R 6, A 4, B 2. Dominant background is G (most common). The output lists R, A, B in order of most frequent among the non-dominant colors: R (6), A (4), B (2). Yes matches. Thus rule: Identify the most frequent color (excluding .) as background, then list other colors sorted descending by frequency, each on its own line (single column). Output only those colors (not background). If ties? Not needed. Now apply to test input. Test input grid: Let's parse. It seems 15 rows? Actually lines show pattern similar but with more colors: R, Y, B, A. Let's list rows. I'll index rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." (12 columns) Row1: ". R R . Y Y . R R . R R ." Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row3: ". B B . R R . Y Y . R R ." Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row5: ". A A . R R . R R . A A ." Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row7: ". R R . R R . B B . R R ." Row8: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row9: ". Y Y . R R . R R . R R ." Row10: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row11: ". R R . B B . R R . Y Y ." Row12: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row13: ". R R . R R . Y Y . R R ." Row14: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." So 15 rows, 12 columns. We need to count occurrences of each col ... [3356 chars truncated]
"A harbor master logging the foreign flags among a fleet of local vessels"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A harbor grid of uniform berths separated by narrow docks. Most berths hold vessels flying the same local pennant. A few berths are occupied by foreign ships displaying different colored ensigns.
Do: Ignore the local fleet. Count how many berths each foreign ensign occupies. Enter them in the harbor log from the nation with the most ships present to the one with the fewest.
Grid: The harbor log is a single column, one foreign ensign color per row, from largest foreign contingent at top to smallest at bottom.
"A technician scanning a circuit board for the components that differ from the standard resistors"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A printed circuit board with components mounted in a regular grid pattern, separated by traces. The vast majority of component pads hold identical standard parts of the same color. A few pads hold non-standard components in distinctive colors.
Do: Ignore the standard components. Identify each non-standard part type by color and count how many pads it occupies. Generate a bill of materials listing non-standard components from most used to least.
Grid: The bill of materials is a single column, one component color per line, from most frequently placed at top to least at bottom.
"A pantheon of forgotten gods — the mortal masses worship one deity, but the oracle must rank the minor gods by the size of their remaining cults"
120b: k=1
See: A temple mosaic of uniform tiles arranged in a sacred grid. Most tiles bear the sigil of the dominant deity. Scattered tiles carry the marks of lesser gods in different sacred colors.
Do: Set aside the dominant deity's sigil. Count the tiles devoted to each lesser god. Deliver the oracle's pronouncement ranking the minor deities from the one with the largest following to the smallest.
Grid: The oracle's scroll is a single column, one sacred color per line, listing minor deities from largest cult at top to smallest at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid appears to have pattern: rows with groups of two same color separated by spaces? Let's examine Example 1 input and output. Example 1 Input (looks like 13 rows? Actually given lines). Let's rewrite quickly. Rows (I'll index): 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G . G G . G G . 3: . . . . . . . . . . 4: . B B . G G . G G . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6: . G G . A A . G G . 7: . . . . . . . . . . 8: . G G . A A . G G . 9: . . . . . . . . . . 10: . G G . R R . R R . 11: . . . . . . . . . . 12: . R R . G G . G G . 13: . . . . . . . . . . Output: R A B So output is a column of colors: R, A, B each on separate line. According to description: "Set aside the dominant deity's sigil. Count the tiles devoted to each lesser god. Deliver the oracle's pronouncement ranking the minor deities from the one with the largest following to the smallest." So we need to find dominant color (most frequent) and ignore it, then count remaining colors and output them sorted descending by count. In example, we need to see which colors appear. Colors present: G, B, A, R. Need to find dominant (most frequent). Let's count approximate. The grid is 13 rows x 10 columns? Actually each row length 10. Let's count occurrences. Rows with patterns: Row2: . G G . G G . G G . => three pairs of G (6 G). Row4: . B B . G G . G G . => B B (2 B) and G G (2) and G G (2) => total B2, G4. Row6: . G G . A A . G G . => G2 + A2 + G2 = G4, A2. Row8 same as row6: G4, A2. Row10: . G G . R R . R R . => G2, R2, R2 = G2, R4. Row12: . R R . G G . G G . => R2, G2, G2 = R2, G4. So total counts: G: row2 6 + row4 4 + row6 4 + row8 4 + row10 2 + row12 4 = 24? Let's sum: 6+4=10, +4=14, +4=18, +2=20, +4=24. B: row4 2 =2. A: rows6+8 each 2 =>4. R: row10 4 + row12 2 =6. Thus most frequent is G (24). So dominant deity is G, set aside. Remaining counts: R=6, A=4, B=2. Sorted descending: R, A, B. Output matches. Thus rule confirmed. Now apply to test input. We need to count colors in test grid, find most frequent, ignore it, then list remaining colors sorted by count descending, each on its own line (single column). Output grid is a column of characters (one per line). No extra spaces? In example output they just listed each color on separate line, no spaces. So we will output lines with single character. Now parse test input. Test Input grid lines (looks 15 rows? Let's count). Provided: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R . Y Y . R R . R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B B . R R . Y Y . R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A A . R R . R R . A A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R . R R . B B . R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y Y . R R . R R . R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R . B B . R R . Y Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R R . R R . Y Y . R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Let's count rows: 15 rows, each with 12 columns (since there are 12 entries). Yes. We need to count occurrences of each color (excluding '.' which is black). Colors present: R, ... [2170 chars truncated]
"A choreographer noting which guest dancers appear on a stage full of corps de ballet performers"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stage floor marked into a grid of uniform positions separated by narrow gaps. Most positions are held by corps dancers in matching costumes. A few positions feature guest artists in distinctive costume colors.
Do: Look past the corps de ballet. Count how many stage positions each guest artist's color occupies. Write the curtain-call order listing guest artists from the one holding the most positions to the one holding the fewest.
Grid: The curtain-call card is a single column, one guest artist color per line, from most stage positions at top to fewest at bottom.
"A geologist core-sampling a uniform sediment layer to find and rank the trace mineral intrusions"
120b: k=1
See: A cross-section of bedrock divided into a grid of uniform sample cells by fracture lines. Most cells contain the same dominant mineral. A few cells hold intrusions of different colored minerals, some minerals appearing in several cells.
Do: Disregard the dominant mineral matrix. Identify each trace mineral by its color and count the cells it occupies. Write your assay report listing trace minerals from the most abundant intrusion to the rarest.
Grid: The assay report is a single column, one mineral color per row, from most abundant trace mineral at top to rarest at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid appears to have pattern: rows with pairs of colors separated by spaces? Actually grid is 13 rows? Let's examine Example 1 input and output. Example 1 Input (looks like 13 rows? Let's count). Provided lines: ". . . . . . . . . ." ". G G . G G . G G ." ". . . . . . . . . ." ". B B . G G . G G ." ". . . . . . . . . ." ". G G . A A . G G ." ". . . . . . . . . ." ". G G . A A . G G ." ". . . . . . . . . ." ". G G . R R . R R ." ". . . . . . . . . ." ". R R . G G . G G ." ". . . . . . . . . ." That's 13 rows, each 10 columns. Pattern: there are rows with two same colored cells separated by a dot? Actually pattern: ". G G . G G . G G ." meaning columns: dot, G, G, dot, G, G, dot, G, G, dot. So pattern of three groups of double G separated by dots. Similarly other rows. The output is: R A B So list of colors sorted by abundance? Let's count occurrences of each non-dominant mineral. Dominant mineral maybe '.' (black) considered background. The "trace minerals" are colors other than '.'? In example, colors present: G, B, A, R. Need to count cells each occupies. Let's count quickly. We have rows with G groups: many. Let's count G cells. Rows with G groups: Row2: ". G G . G G . G G ." => 6 G cells. Row4: ". B B . G G . G G ." => 4 G cells. Row6: ". G G . A A . G G ." => 4 G cells. Row8: ". G G . A A . G G ." => 4 G cells. Row10: ". G G . R R . R R ." => 4 G cells. Row12: ". R R . G G . G G ." => 4 G cells. Total G = 6+4+4+4+4+4 = 26? Wait compute: 6+4=10, +4=14, +4=18, +4=22, +4=26. Yes 26 G cells. Now B cells: Row4 has ". B B . ..." => 2 B cells. Row? any other B rows? Not else. So B =2. A cells: Row6 has ". A A . ..." =>2 A. Row8 also 2 A. Total A=4. R cells: Row10 has ". R R . ..." =>2 R. Row12 has ". R R . ..." =>2 R. Also maybe other rows? Not else. So R=4. Thus counts: G 26, A 4, R 4, B 2. But output lists R, A, B (no G). So they disregarded the dominant mineral matrix (most abundant) which is G. So they list trace minerals sorted from most abundant to rarest, excluding the most abundant (dominant). Among remaining: A and R both 4, B 2. Need tie-breaking? Output order: R then A then B. So among A and R tie, they placed R before A. Maybe alphabetical? R after A alphabetically, but they placed R first. Could be order of appearance in grid? Let's see first occurrence of each trace mineral after ignoring dominant. Scan rows top to bottom left to right: Row2 has G only. Row4 has B first (col2). Row4 also G later. Row6 has A first (col2). Row8 A again. Row10 R first (col2). Row12 R first (col2). So order of first appearance: B, A, R. But output is R, A, B reverse? Not that. Maybe they sort by descending count, and for ties sort by descending alphabetical? R > A? R later alphabetically, but descending alphabetical would be R then A. That matches. So rule: sort by count descending, ties broken by alphabetical descending (or maybe by color code order?). Let's test: coun ... [8075 chars truncated]
"Picking out the spices from a pot of plain rice"
120b: k=1
See: A large serving tray divided into uniform compartments, most filled with the same staple grain. Scattered among them are compartments holding different colorful spices — some appearing in several compartments, others in just one or two.
Do: Discard the base ingredient that fills most compartments. Gather the remaining spices and arrange them on a tasting strip from the one you used the most of down to the one you used the least.
Grid: A single vertical tasting strip, one spice per slot, colored accordingly, running from most abundant seasoning at the top to scarcest at the bottom.
We need to infer rule. From description: "large serving tray divided into uniform compartments, most filled with same staple grain. Scattered among them are compartments holding different colorful spices — some appearing in several compartments, others in just one or two. Discard the base ingredient that fills most compartments. Gather the remaining spices and arrange them on a tasting strip from the one you used the most of down to the one you used the least. Grid details: A single vertical tasting strip, one spice per slot, colored accordingly, running from most abundant seasoning at the top to scarcest at the bottom." Interpretation: Input grid is like many 2x? compartments? In examples, pattern: rows with groups of three cells? Let's examine Example 1 input. It shows 13 rows? Actually lines: . . . . . . . . . . (row0) . G G . G G . G G . (row1) . . . . . . . . . . (row2) . B B . G G . G G . (row3) . . . . . . . . . . (row4) . G G . A A . G G . (row5) . . . . . . . . . . (row6) . G G . A A . G G . (row7) . . . . . . . . . . (row8) . G G . R R . R R . (row9) . . . . . . . . . . (row10) . R R . G G . G G . (row11) . . . . . . . . . . (row12) So grid 13 rows, 10 columns? Actually each row has 10 entries (including spaces). The pattern: every other row is empty (all .). The non-empty rows have pattern: . X X . X X . X X . (three groups of two same color separated by .). So each "compartment" maybe a 2x2 block? Actually groups of two horizontally. Thus each non-empty row contains three pairs of same color. Colors: G, B, A, R etc. The "base ingredient that fills most compartments" likely is the color that appears most frequently across all compartments (pairs). In example, we need to count occurrences of each color across all pairs (each pair counts as one compartment). Let's count. Rows with pairs: Row1: G G, G G, G G => three G compartments. Row3: B B, G G, G G => B, G, G => two G, one B. Row5: G G, A A, G G => G, A, G => two G, one A. Row7: G G, A A, G G => same as row5. Row9: G G, R R, R R => G, R, R => one G, two R. Row11: R R, G G, G G => R, G, G => one R, two G. Now tally compartments (each pair counts as one). Count per color: G: Row1 3, Row3 2, Row5 2, Row7 2, Row9 1, Row11 2 = total 12? Let's sum: 3+2+2+2+1+2 =12. B: Row3 1 =1. A: Row5 1, Row7 1 =2. R: Row9 2, Row11 1 =3. Thus most abundant is G (12). So discard G. Remaining spices: B (1), A (2), R (3). Arrange on vertical strip from most abundant to least: R (3) top, A (2) middle, B (1) bottom. Output grid given: R, A, B each on separate rows (single column). Indeed output shows three rows: R, A, B. Thus rule matches. Now test input: need to count compartments (pairs) of each color, ignoring '.'. Let's parse test input. Provided rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12 columns? Actually 13? Let's count: there are 13 entries? Let's count: ". . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 13? Let's count: positions: 1 .,2 .,3 .,4 .,5 .,6 .,7 .,8 .,9 .,10 ... [2615 chars truncated]
"An orchestra tuning up — the drone of the strings drowns everything, but the conductor listens for the soloists"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A concert hall seating chart with uniform sections, most occupied by the same instrument group. A few seats here and there are held by different solo instruments, some appearing more often than others.
Do: Tune out the droning ensemble that fills most chairs. Listen for each soloist's voice and note how many chairs each claims. Write the program listing soloists from the one with the most seats to the one with the fewest.
Grid: The printed program is a single column, one soloist per line in their signature color, ordered from most represented to least.
"A stadium full of home fans with pockets of away supporters — the announcer ranks the visiting teams"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stadium seating grid broken into uniform block sections separated by aisles. The vast majority of blocks wear the home team's color. Scattered blocks of visiting fans display different team colors.
Do: Ignore the home crowd entirely. Count the sections claimed by each visiting team and announce them over the PA system, starting with the away team that brought the biggest contingent.
Grid: The scoreboard ticker is a single vertical column showing one visiting team color per row, from largest away contingent at top to smallest at bottom.
"A meteorologist scanning a radar map of calm skies for scattered storm cells"
120b: k=1
See: A weather radar display divided into uniform cells in a grid. Most cells show the same calm-weather reading. A few cells flash with different storm signatures — some storm types appear in multiple cells, others in just one or two.
Do: Dismiss the prevailing fair weather that dominates the map. Identify each distinct storm type and count its occurrences. Issue an alert bulletin listing storm types from the most widespread disturbance to the rarest.
Grid: The alert bulletin is a single vertical column, one storm type per row in its radar color, ordered from most widespread at top to most isolated at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid is 13 rows? Let's examine example 1. Input shows pattern: many rows with groups of two same colors separated by dots. Output is three rows: R, A, B (vertical column). So they listed distinct colors that are not the majority? Let's analyze. In example 1 input, colors present: G, B, A, R. The grid seems to have many G groups, also B groups, A groups, R groups. Need to count occurrences of each distinct color (excluding background .). Then output column sorted descending by count (most frequent top). Output shows R, A, B. So R most frequent, then A, then B. G is missing. Why? Perhaps G is the "prevailing fair weather" i.e., the most common color overall, which is dismissed. So we ignore the most common color and list the rest sorted by frequency descending. Let's test counts. Need to count occurrences of each color in example 1. Let's parse quickly. Input grid lines (I'll index). Provided as 13 rows? Actually they show many rows with blank lines? Let's rewrite: Row1: . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . G G . G G . G G . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . B B . G G . G G . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . G G . A A . G G . Row7: . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . G G . A A . G G . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . Row10: . G G . R R . R R . Row11: . . . . . . . . . . Row12: . R R . G G . G G . Row13: . . . . . . . . . . So grid 13 rows, 10 columns. Count each color: Row2: G G (2) then G G (2) then G G (2) total 6 G. Row4: B B (2) G G (2) G G (2) => 2 B, 4 G. Row6: G G (2) A A (2) G G (2) => 2 G, 2 A, 2 G => total 4 G, 2 A. Row8: same as row6 => 4 G, 2 A. Row10: G G (2) R R (2) R R (2) => 2 G, 4 R. Row12: R R (2) G G (2) G G (2) => 2 R, 4 G. Now sum: G: row2 6 + row4 4 + row6 4 + row8 4 + row10 2 + row12 4 = 24? Let's compute: 6+4=10, +4=14, +4=18, +2=20, +4=24. Yes G=24. B: row4 2 =2. A: rows6+8 each 2 => total 4 A. R: row10 4 + row12 2 =6 R. Thus counts: G 24, R 6, A 4, B 2. Most common is G (24) which is omitted. Remaining sorted descending: R (6), A (4), B (2). Output matches. Thus rule: Identify the most frequent non-background color (excluding .). Remove it. Then list remaining colors in descending order of frequency, each on its own row, as a single column grid (height = number of remaining colors). Use the color character as cell content. If tie? Not seen. Probably any order? Might be alphabetical? But not needed. Now apply to test input. We need to count colors in test input grid. Test Input grid appears 15 rows? Let's list rows: Row1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . R R . Y Y . R R . R R . Row3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row4: . B B . R R . Y Y . R R . Row5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row6: . A A . R R . R R . A A . Row7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row8: . R R . R R . B B . R R . Row9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row10: . Y Y . R R . R R . R R . Row11: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row12: . R R . B B . R R . Y Y . Row13: . . . . . . . . . . . . . Row14: . R R . R R . Y Y . R R . Row1 ... [1986 chars truncated]
"A city inspector cataloging the odd buildings in a neighborhood of identical houses"
120b: fig alone solves
See: An aerial view of a city block laid out in a perfect grid of uniform lot parcels separated by narrow alleyways. Most lots contain identical buildings of the same color. A handful of lots hold buildings painted in distinctive colors, some colors appearing on multiple lots.
Do: Skip the cookie-cutter houses that dominate the neighborhood. Tally each unique architectural accent color and rank them. File your inspection report listing nonconforming buildings from most numerous to least.
Grid: The inspection report is a single narrow column — one colored entry per nonconforming type, ranked from most common deviation at top to rarest at bottom.
"A general surveying a battlefield map, ignoring his own legions to count the scattered enemy banners"
120b: k=1
See: A battlefield map divided into uniform encampments on a grid. The vast majority fly the same banner — the general's own forces. Scattered among them are small detachments flying foreign banners of various colors.
Do: Disregard your own forces entirely. Count how many encampments each enemy faction holds. Prepare your intelligence briefing ranking hostile forces from the largest presence to the smallest.
Grid: The intelligence briefing is a single column, one enemy banner color per row, from the faction occupying the most positions at top to the fewest at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid seems pattern: rows with groups of two same color separated by spaces? The output is a column listing colors sorted by count descending, but only enemy colors (excluding "own forces"). Which color is "own"? In description: "vast majority fly same banner — the general's own forces." So majority color in grid is own, to be ignored. In example 1, we need to see which color is majority. Input grid 1: colors present: G, B, A, R. Let's count approximate. The grid seems 13 rows? Actually given lines: many rows with patterns. Let's count occurrences: each row with groups of two same color repeated. For example row2: ". G G . G G . G G ." that's three groups of G (each 2 cells) => 6 G. Row4: ". B B . G G . G G ." => 2 B, 4 G. Row6: ". G G . A A . G G ." => 4 G, 2 A. Row8 similar. Row10: ". G G . R R . R R ." => 4 G, 4 R. Row12: ". R R . G G . G G ." => 2 R, 4 G. So total G appears many times, likely majority. So own forces = G. Then we count other colors: A, B, R. Count each: Let's tally. We'll compute counts: Initialize counts: B, A, R. Row2: G only, ignore. Row4: B B (2 B), G G (4 G) ignore. Row6: G G (2 G), A A (2 A), G G (2 G) => 2 A. Row8: same as row6 => another 2 A. Row10: G G (2 G), R R (2 R), R R (2 R) => 4 R. Row12: R R (2 R), G G (2 G), G G (2 G) => 2 R. Row? also there is row? Actually after row12 there is maybe more rows? Let's list all rows from example: Given Input lines: 1: . . . . . . . . . . 2: . G G . G G . G G . 3: . . . . . . . . . . 4: . B B . G G . G G . 5: . . . . . . . . . . 6: . G G . A A . G G . 7: . . . . . . . . . . 8: . G G . A A . G G . 9: . . . . . . . . . . 10: . G G . R R . R R . 11: . . . . . . . . . . 12: . R R . G G . G G . 13: . . . . . . . . . . So total rows 13. We counted all colored rows: rows2,4,6,8,10,12. Good. Now compute totals: B: only row4 has 2 B. So B count =2. A: rows6 and8 each have 2 A => total 4 A. R: row10 has 4 R, row12 has 2 R => total 6 R. Thus counts: R=6, A=4, B=2. Output column is: R A B Matches example output. So rule: Identify majority color (most frequent) and ignore it. Then list remaining colors sorted descending by count, each on its own row (single column). If tie? Not shown. Now apply to test input. We need to count colors in test grid. Colors present: R, Y, B, A maybe? Let's parse test input lines. Given test input lines (with spaces). Let's list rows: 1: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . R R . Y Y . R R . R R . 3: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4: . B B . R R . Y Y . R R . 5: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6: . A A . R R . R R . A A . 7: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8: . R R . R R . B B . R R . 9: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10: . Y Y . R R . R R . R R . 11: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12: . R R . B B . R R . Y Y . 13: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14: . R R . R R . Y Y . R R . 15: . . . . . . . . . . . . . So grid 15 rows, 13 columns? Actually each row has 13 entries (including .). Good. Now count o ... [1834 chars truncated]
"A casting director reviewing headshots pinned to a board — most are extras, but a few are named roles"
120b: k=1
See: A casting board arranged in a neat grid of headshot slots separated by thin borders. Most slots are filled with the same type of extra. A few slots feature performers in distinctive costume colors, some costume colors appearing multiple times.
Do: Ignore the extras who fill most of the board. Count how many slots each named-role costume appears in. Print the playbill listing featured roles from the one with the most appearances to the one with the fewest.
Grid: The playbill is a single column, one featured role per line in its costume color, from most appearances at top to fewest at bottom.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid is larger with many rows, pattern of 2x2 blocks? Let's examine Example1 input and output. Input grid (looks like 13 rows? Actually given lines). Let's reconstruct: It seems pattern of rows with . and colors. The grid appears to have rows of 10 columns? Let's count first line: ". . . . . . . . . ." =10 columns. Then second line: ". G G . G G . G G ." =10 columns. So grid 13 rows? Let's count lines: Provided lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . 2 . G G . G G . G G . 3 . . . . . . . . . . 4 . B B . G G . G G . 5 . . . . . . . . . . 6 . G G . A A . G G . 7 . . . . . . . . . . 8 . G G . A A . G G . 9 . . . . . . . . . . 10 . G G . R R . R R . 11 . . . . . . . . . . 12 . R R . G G . G G . 13 . . . . . . . . . . So 13 rows, 10 columns. Output: R A B So output is a column listing colors (roles) sorted by frequency descending. In input, we have many G, B, A, R. Need count each colored cell (non-dot). Let's count. We need to count occurrences of each color (excluding the filler?). The description: "Ignore the extras who fill most of the board." The filler likely is the most common color? In example, which color appears most? Let's count quickly. Rows with G G etc. Row2: pattern ". G G . G G . G G ." => three pairs of G: positions 2-3,5-6,8-9 => total 6 G. Row4: ". B B . G G . G G ." => B B (2), G G (2), G G (2) => 2 B, 4 G. Row6: ". G G . A A . G G ." => G G (2), A A (2), G G (2) => 4 G, 2 A. Row8: same as row6: 4 G, 2 A. Row10: ". G G . R R . R R ." => G G (2), R R (2), R R (2) => 2 G, 4 R. Row12: ". R R . G G . G G ." => R R (2), G G (2), G G (2) => 2 R, 4 G. Now sum: G: row2 6 + row4 4 + row6 4 + row8 4 + row10 2 + row12 4 = 24? Let's compute: 6+4=10, +4=14, +4=18, +2=20, +4=24. Yes G=24. B: row4 2 =2. A: rows6+8 each 2 => total 4. R: row10 4 + row12 2 =6. Thus counts: G 24, R 6, A 4, B 2. But output lists R, A, B (excluding G). So they ignored the most common filler (G). So rule: Identify the most frequent color (excluding .) and ignore it; then list remaining colors sorted descending by count. Thus output column includes colors other than the most frequent, sorted by count descending. Now test input: need to count colors. Test input grid dimensions: appears 15 rows? Let's count lines: 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . R R . Y Y . R R . R R . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . B B . R R . Y Y . R R . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . A A . R R . R R . A A . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 . R R . R R . B B . R R . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . Y Y . R R . R R . R R . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 . R R . B B . R R . Y Y . 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . R R . R R . Y Y . R R . 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . So 15 rows, 13 columns. We need to count each color: R, Y, B, A. Possibly others? Let's tally. We'll go row by row. Row2: ". R R . Y Y . R R . R R ." Positions: R R (2), Y Y (2), R R (2), R R (2) => total R: 2+2+2 =6? Wait there are three R pairs: firs ... [1857 chars truncated]
"A groundskeeper inventorying the unusual blooms that have sprouted among the uniform lawn squares"
120b: fig alone solves
See: A formal garden parterre divided into uniform planting beds by narrow gravel paths. Most beds contain the same common ground cover. A few beds have sprouted distinctive flowering plants in various colors.
Do: Ignore the ground cover that blankets most beds. Count how many beds each unusual bloom occupies. Write your planting inventory listing the flowers from most widespread to rarest.
Grid: The inventory card is a single vertical column, one flower color per row, from the bloom occupying the most beds at top to the one in the fewest at bottom.
See: The input grid contains a pattern of colored cells that tiles periodically in both rows and columns, forming a repeating 2D mosaic. A rectangular region of the grid has been replaced with black (.) cells, creating a 'hole' in the otherwise regular tiling pattern. The non-black portion of the grid is fully consistent with a single repeating tile.
Do: 1. Identify the repeating tile by finding the row period and column period of the non-black cells. Compare rows and columns in the intact (non-black) region to determine the smallest periods P_r (row period) and P_c (column period) such that the pattern repeats every P_r rows and every P_c columns. 2. Extract one copy of the repeating tile: a P_r × P_c subgrid from any fully intact region of the grid. 3. Locate the rectangular region of black (.) cells. 4. For each black cell at position (r, c), compute the tile value as tile[r mod P_r][c mod P_c]. 5. Output only the rectangular block of restored values that replaces the black cells, matching the dimensions of the hole.
Grid: The grid dimensions vary across instances. The grid is composed entirely of colored cells arranged in a periodic tiling pattern, with one contiguous rectangular region of black (.) cells representing the missing portion. The output grid has the same dimensions as the missing rectangular region and contains the tile values that fill the hole.
"A tapestry weaver mends a moth-eaten hole by reading the rhythm of the surviving threads."
120b: k=1
See: A grand tapestry hangs on the wall, its colored threads woven in a endlessly repeating motif — a small melodic phrase played over and over across rows and columns. But moths have eaten through one corner, leaving a rectangle of bare black canvas where the pattern should continue. The surviving fabric hums with perfect regularity, every stitch loyal to the same small refrain.
Do: Listen to the tapestry's song — find the shortest melodic phrase that, when looped, reproduces every intact thread. Once you know the refrain by heart, hold it up to the moth-eaten hole and let the melody fill in what the moths stole. Sing only the missing notes — the patch that makes the tapestry whole again.
Grid: The tapestry varies in size but is always woven from a small repeating motif of colored threads tiling seamlessly in both directions. The moth-eaten hole is a contiguous rectangle of bare black canvas. Your repair patch matches the hole's dimensions exactly, carrying only the colors the refrain demands at each position.
We need to infer the puzzle: given a grid with a repeating pattern and a rectangular hole of '.' (black). Need to output the patch that fills the hole: the colors that should be there according to the repeating motif. In example 1: Input grid: A M . M M A M A A M A M M A M A Output: A So the hole is a single '.' at position (row1,col3) (0-index?). The repeating motif appears to be a 2x2 pattern? Let's examine grid without hole. Rows: 1: A M . M 2: M A M A 3: A M A M 4: M A M A Looks like a checkerboard of A and M alternating both rows and columns. Pattern: A M M A repeating. Indeed a 2x2 tile. So the missing cell should be M? Wait pattern: coordinates (r,c) parity: if (r+c) even => A? Let's test: (0,0) A (even) => A. (0,1) M (odd) => M. (0,2) missing should be A? Actually (0+2)=2 even => A. But output is A. Yes matches. So output is A. Good. Thus rule: Determine smallest repeating tile (both dimensions) that tiles the grid (ignoring '.'), then fill the '.' rectangle with appropriate colors from that tile. Now test input grid: We have 7 columns? Let's write rows: Row0: A B A A . . . Row1: B A A B . . . Row2: A A B A . . . Row3: A B A A B A A Row4: B A A B A A B Row5: A A B A A B A Row6: A B A A B A A So grid 7x7? Actually rows 0-6 (7 rows) and columns 0-6 (7 columns). The hole is a rectangle of '.' in top right corner? Let's locate '.' positions: rows 0-2 have '.' at columns 4,5,6? Row0: columns 4,5,6 are '.' '.' '.' (three). Row1: columns 4,5,6 '.' '.' '.' . Row2: columns 4,5,6 '.' '.' '.' . So a 3x3 rectangle at rows 0-2, cols 4-6. Goal: find repeating motif that tiles entire grid (including hole area). The rest of grid (non '.' cells) should be consistent with some small pattern. We need to find smallest tile dimensions that repeat both horizontally and vertically. Let's extract the known part: rows 3-6 are fully filled (no holes). Let's write them: Row3 (index3): A B A A B A A Row4: B A A B A A B Row5: A A B A A B A Row6: A B A A B A A Observe pattern maybe period 4? Let's examine columns. Write grid as matrix: r\c:0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0: A B A A . . . 1: B A A B . . . 2: A A B A . . . 3: A B A A B A A 4: B A A B A A B 5: A A B A A B A 6: A B A A B A A We can try to see if pattern is 4x4? Let's look at rows 3-6 maybe repeat rows 0-3? Row3 equals row0? Row0 is A B A A ... Row3 is A B A A B A A (extra). Not same because row0 has '.' after col3. But ignoring hole, first 4 columns of row3: A B A A matches row0 first 4 columns A B A A. Row4 first 4 columns: B A A B matches row1 first 4 columns B A A B. Row5 first 4 columns: A A B A matches row2 first 4 columns A A B A. Row6 first 4 columns: A B A A matches row0 first 4 columns again. So seems pattern repeats every 3 rows? Actually rows 0-2 pattern repeats in rows 3-5? Row3 matches row0, row4 matches row1, row5 matches row2, row6 matches row0 again. So vertical period 3? Let's check: rows 0,3,6 are same (first 4 columns). rows1,4 same. rows2,5 same. So period 3 rows. Now hori ... [3383 chars truncated]
"A geneticist reconstructs a corrupted segment of DNA by recognizing the codon repeat cycle that governs the rest of the strand."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A chromosome laid out in colored nucleotides, repeating in a known periodicity — except one stretch has gone dark, its bases erased by radiation damage.
Do: Read the healthy portion of the sequence to identify the repeating codon unit. Clone that unit's pattern into the damaged region, aligning by phase, and report only the repaired segment.
Grid: Nucleotides are colored cells tiling in fixed row and column periods. The dark (black) cells are the radiation-damaged gap. The output is the restored nucleotide block.
"An astronomer reconstructs a corrupted region of a star map by exploiting the crystalline periodicity of stars in a lattice galaxy."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A star chart where colored stars repeat in a perfectly regular 2D lattice — except one rectangular field of view is obscured by a dust cloud (black).
Do: Measure the lattice constants from the visible stars. Predict which stars lie behind the dust cloud and report only that rectangular field.
Grid: Colored cells are stars in a periodic lattice. Black cells are the dust-obscured region. Output is the predicted star field.
"A cartographer restores a sea chart's missing corner by continuing the periodic pattern of colored depth soundings that tile the rest of the map."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A nautical chart where colored depth markers repeat in a rigid grid pattern — but one rectangular corner has been torn off, leaving blank parchment (black).
Do: Identify the repeating sounding unit from the intact chart. Extrapolate the missing soundings into the torn corner and present only the restored rectangle.
Grid: Colored cells are periodic depth soundings. Black cells are the missing corner. Output matches the torn rectangle's dimensions.
"A technician repairs a damaged circuit board by replacing a burned-out rectangular cluster of components, reading their values from the board's repeating module layout."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A PCB where colored components repeat in a fixed modular pattern — but one rectangular cluster has burned out, leaving dead traces (black).
Do: Determine the module dimensions from the working sections of the board. Solder in replacement components matching the repeating layout and document only the repaired cluster.
Grid: Colored cells are components in a periodic module. Black is the burned cluster. Output is the replacement component block.
"A scribe restores a damaged section of a divine tapestry by invoking the eternal pattern that the gods wove into every repeating panel."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A celestial tapestry where colored threads form a small divine motif repeated endlessly in both directions — but one rectangular section has been scorched by divine fire, leaving void (black).
Do: Discern the sacred motif's dimensions from the unburned cloth. Reweave the scorched rectangle to match the eternal pattern and present only the restored section.
Grid: Colored threads tile as the divine motif. Black is the scorched void. Output is the reweaving for the burned rectangle.
"A choreographer fills an empty rectangle on the dance floor by extending the repeating formation that every other dancer follows in lockstep."
120b: k=1
See: A ballroom floor where dancers in colored costumes stand in a strictly periodic formation — but one rectangular section of the floor is empty (black), its dancers missing.
Do: Identify the formation's repeat unit from the occupied positions. Assign dancers to the empty spots so the pattern continues seamlessly, and list only the placements for the vacant rectangle.
Grid: Colored cells are costumed dancers in periodic formation. Black cells are the empty spots. Output is the missing dancers' placement.
We need to infer rule. Example: Input grid 4x4? Actually Example 1 Input: A M . M M A M A A M A M M A M A Output: A (single cell). So output is just the color that should fill the black cell? The black cell is '.' at position (0,2) (0-index). The pattern seems periodic. Let's examine pattern: It looks like a checkerboard of A and M alternating? Let's see grid: Row0: A M . M Row1: M A M A Row2: A M A M Row3: M A M A If we ignore the '.' at (0,2), the rest forms a pattern where A and M alternate like a chessboard: positions where (row+col) even maybe A? Let's compute: (0,0) even sum 0 => A. (0,1) sum1 odd => M. (0,2) sum2 even would be A but it's missing. (0,3) sum3 odd => M matches. Row1: (1,0) sum1 odd => M matches. (1,1) sum2 even => A matches. (1,2) sum3 odd => M matches. (1,3) sum4 even => A matches. So pattern is indeed A on even parity, M on odd parity. So missing cell should be A. Output is A. So rule: fill missing black cells with the color that continues the periodic pattern (likely a 2-color checkerboard). But there could be larger periodicities. Now test input: 7 columns? Let's write grid rows: Row0: A B A A . . . Row1: B A A B . . . Row2: A A B A . . . Row3: A B A A B A A Row4: B A A B A A B Row5: A A B A A B A Row6: A B A A B A A So grid size 7x7? Actually rows 0-6 (7 rows) and columns 0-6 (7 columns). Black cells '.' appear in top left region? Let's map coordinates. I'll create matrix with coordinates. Row0 col0 A 0,1 B 0,2 A 0,3 A 0,4 . 0,5 . 0,6 . Row1: 1,0 B 1,1 A 1,2 A 1,3 B 1,4 . 1,5 . 1,6 . Row2: 2,0 A 2,1 A 2,2 B 2,3 A 2,4 . 2,5 . 2,6 . Rows 3-6 have no '.' (full). So missing rectangle is top right 3x3? Actually rows 0-2, cols 4-6 are '.' all black. That's a 3x3 rectangle. We need to infer pattern from rest of grid (occupied cells). Determine periodic formation. Likely a repeating tile of size maybe 2x2? Let's examine pattern of colors A,B maybe also other colors? Only A and B appear in given grid (no other colors). So pattern likely a checkerboard of A and B? Let's test parity: For positions (row+col) even maybe A? Let's compute some known cells. (0,0) sum0 even => A (yes) (0,1) sum1 odd => B (yes) (0,2) sum2 even => A (yes) (0,3) sum3 odd => A (but expected B if checkerboard). So fails. Maybe pattern is more complex, maybe period 3? Let's look at rows 3-6 which are full, maybe they reveal pattern. Rows 3: A B A A B A A Indices: (3,0) A (3,1) B (3,2) A (3,3) A (3,4) B (3,5) A (3,6) A Row4: B A A B A A B Row5: A A B A A B A Row6: A B A A B A A Seems pattern maybe like a 4x4 tile? Let's try to see if rows 3-6 repeat rows 0-3 shifted? Compare row3 with row0? Row0: A B A A . . . ; row3: A B A A B A A. So first four columns match row0 first four columns. Row3 has extra B A A after column3. Row4 maybe matches row1? Row1: B A A B . . . ; row4: B A A B A A B. So matches first four columns, then extra A A B. Row5 matches row2? Row2: A A B A . . . ; row5: A A B A A B A. Yes first four ... [7527 chars truncated]
"A mineralogist reconstructs a shattered section of a crystal cross-section by extending the unit cell that repeats throughout the intact lattice."
120b: k=1
See: A crystal thin-section where colored mineral grains repeat in a perfect 2D unit cell — but one rectangular region has fractured away, leaving void (black).
Do: Measure the unit cell dimensions from the surviving lattice. Predict the mineral arrangement in the fractured region and report only that rectangular section.
Grid: Colored cells are mineral grains tiling as a unit cell. Black is the fractured void. Output is the predicted mineral arrangement for the missing rectangle.
We need to infer rule from example. Only one training example given: Input 4x4 grid with colors A, M, . (black). Output is a single cell "A". So rule: find missing rectangle (black region) and fill with pattern from unit cell. In example, input:
Row1: A M . M
Row2: M A M A
Row3: A M A M
Row4: M A M A
We need to see pattern: seems like a checkerboard of A and M alternating, but with a missing black cell at (1,3) (1-indexed). The pattern would be A M A M in row1 if no missing. Indeed row1 currently A M . M, missing should be A. Output is A (the predicted mineral for that missing cell). So output is just the missing region's predicted arrangement. In this case missing region is 1x1, output single cell.
Thus rule: Identify the rectangular region of black cells ('.') which is contiguous rectangle (maybe could be larger). Determine the repeating unit cell pattern from the rest of grid (tiling). Then fill the rectangle with appropriate colors according to pattern, output only that rectangle (same dimensions as black region). So we need to apply to test input.
Test Input grid dimensions? Let's write rows:
Row1: A B A A . . .
Row2: B A A B . . .
Row3: A A B A . . .
Row4: A B A A B A A
Row5: B A A B A A B
Row6: A A B A A B A
Row7: A B A A B A A
So 7 rows, 7 columns.
We need to locate black rectangle(s). There are '.' in rows 1-3 columns 5-7? Let's map.
Row1 col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 '.'
Row2 col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 '.'
Row3 col5 '.' col6 '.' col7 '.'
Rows 4-7 have no '.'.
Thus black region is rows 1-3, columns 5-7: a 3x3 rectangle of black cells.
We need to infer the unit cell pattern from the rest of grid (non-black). The rest appears to be a tiling pattern of colors A and B maybe? Let's examine.
We have colors A and B only (maybe also others). Let's list the known pattern.
Create a 7x7 grid with coordinates (r,c). Fill known cells.
I'll write matrix:
r1: c1 A, c2 B, c3 A, c4 A, c5 ., c6 ., c7 .
r2: B A A B . . .
r3: A A B A . . .
r4: A B A A B A A
r5: B A A B A A B
r6: A A B A A B A
r7: A B A A B A A
We need to find smallest repeating unit cell that tiles the whole grid (excluding black region). Likely a 2x2 or 3x3 pattern.
Let's examine rows 4-7 (full rows) to see pattern. Rows 4-7 are 4 rows, 7 columns.
Rows 4: A B A A B A A
Row5: B A A B A A B
Row6: A A B A A B A
Row7: A B A A B A A
Looks like maybe a 3x3 unit? Let's try to see periodicity.
Check columns pattern: column1 values rows4-7: A, B, A, A. Not repeating simple.
Maybe the pattern is a 4x4? But grid size 7 not multiple.
But maybe the pattern is a checkerboard of A and B with some offset? Let's see if it's like a pattern where A and B positions follow some rule like (r+c) mod something.
Compute (r+c) parity: For row4 col1 (4+1=5 odd) -> A. Row4 col2 (6 even) -> B. Row4 col3 (7 odd) -> A. Row4 col4 (8 even) -> A (but would expect B if simple checker). So not simple.
Maybe pattern is a 3x3 tile:
Let's extract a candidate tile from rows4-6, cols1-3 maybe:
Rows4-6,
... [2767 chars truncated]
"A baker patches a torn sheet of decorative fondant by studying the repeating motif stamped across the surviving surface."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sheet of fondant pressed with a small colored stamp in a repeating grid pattern covers a cake — but a rectangular piece has been torn away, leaving bare cake (black) showing through.
Do: Determine the stamp's dimensions from the intact fondant. Cut a new patch using the same stamp, aligned to the surrounding pattern, and present only the patch itself.
Grid: Colored cells are the stamped fondant pattern; black cells are the torn-away gap. The output patch matches the hole's dimensions.
"A conductor reconstructs a water-damaged measure by listening to the ostinato that loops unchanged through every other bar."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A musical score in which a short colored motif repeats across rows (instruments) and columns (beats) — but ink has washed away from one rectangular block of the page, leaving silence.
Do: Identify the motif's length and voicing from the legible bars. Transcribe what must fill the silent block so the ostinato continues unbroken, and hand over only that fragment.
Grid: Each colored cell is a note assigned to an instrument-beat position. Black cells are the washed-out silence. The output is the reconstructed fragment.
"A choreographer restores a marching band's formation chart after coffee spills over one corner, using the drill's strict repeating pattern."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A stadium field diagram where colored uniforms tile in a precise repeating formation — but a rectangular section of the chart is stained and illegible (black).
Do: Read the cadence of the repeating formation block from the clean portion. Fill in the stained rectangle with the marchers who must stand there, and submit only that rectangle.
Grid: Colored cells represent uniformed marchers in a periodic formation. Black is the coffee stain. The output is the restored corner of the chart.
"A meteorologist fills in a satellite image's dead pixels by extending the perfectly periodic pressure-front pattern visible everywhere else."
120b: k=1
See: A weather map rendered in colored pressure bands that repeat with clockwork regularity — except one rectangular patch of the satellite feed has dropped out, leaving black static.
Do: Measure the pressure band's repeat interval in both latitude and longitude from the working pixels. Infer what the dead-pixel rectangle should show and transmit only that recovered patch.
Grid: Colored cells are repeating pressure bands. Black cells are the dead-pixel dropout. The output is the recovered image patch.
We need to infer rule. Example 1: Input 4x4 grid with colors A (azure) and M (magenta) and a black '.' at position (0,2?) Let's map coordinates row0: "A M . M". row1: "M A M A". row2: "A M A M". row3: "M A M A". Output: "A". So output is a single cell containing A. How derived? The pattern seems like a checkerboard of A and M alternating. The black cell is at (0,2) which would be expected to be A or M based on pattern. Let's compute expected pattern: Starting top-left (0,0) = A. Then (0,1) = M, (0,2) = A, (0,3) = M. Indeed pattern is alternating like chessboard. Black cell at (0,2) should be A. Output is A. So rule: Identify repeating pattern (periodic) of colors, infer missing black region's content, output the recovered patch (maybe the minimal rectangle covering all black cells). In example, black region is a single cell, output that cell's inferred color.
Now test input: 7x7 grid? Let's write rows:
Row0: "A B A A . . ."
Row1: "B A A B . . ."
Row2: "A A B A . . ."
Row3: "A B A A B A A"
Row4: "B A A B A A B"
Row5: "A A B A A B A"
Row6: "A B A A B A A"
So there is a rectangular block of black '.' in top right corner: columns 4,5,6 rows 0,1,2 (3x3 block). Need to infer pattern from rest of grid.
We need to find repeat interval in both dimensions (latitude/longitude). Likely pattern repeats with some period. Let's examine grid ignoring black region.
We have colors A, B only? Yes only A and B appear elsewhere. So pattern likely a checkerboard but maybe with offset.
Let's write coordinates (r,c). We'll list known cells.
Row0: col0 A,1 B,2 A,3 A,4 .,5 .,6 .
Row1: 0 B,1 A,2 A,3 B,4 .,5 .,6 .
Row2: 0 A,1 A,2 B,3 A,4 .,5 .,6 .
Row3: 0 A,1 B,2 A,3 A,4 B,5 A,6 A
Row4: 0 B,1 A,2 A,3 B,4 A,5 A,6 B
Row5: 0 A,1 A,2 B,3 A,4 A,5 B,6 A
Row6: 0 A,1 B,2 A,3 A,4 B,5 A,6 A
We need to find periodicity. Let's see pattern maybe period 3? Let's examine rows 3-5 similar to rows 0-2 but shifted? Compare row3 (index3) to row0: row0: A B A A ... row3: A B A A B A A. Not same because extra columns.
But maybe pattern repeats every 3 rows and 3 columns. Let's extract subgrid of size 3x3 that repeats.
Take rows 0-2, cols0-2:
[ [A,B,A],
[B,A,A],
[A,A,B] ]
Now rows 3-5, cols0-2:
Row3 cols0-2: A B A
Row4: B A A
Row5: A A B
Exactly same as above! Good. So period 3 rows, 3 columns. So pattern repeats every 3 rows and 3 columns.
Now we need to infer missing 3x3 block at rows0-2, cols4-6. Since period 3, columns 4-6 correspond to columns 1-3? Actually modulo 3: column index mod 3. Let's compute mapping: col0 mod3=0, col1=1, col2=2, col3=0, col4=1, col5=2, col6=0. So columns 4,5,6 correspond to mod 1,2,0 respectively, i.e., same as columns 1,2,0.
Rows 0-2 mod 3 are 0,1,2 (same as themselves). So missing block should be pattern values at (row mod3, col mod3) = rows 0-2, cols 1,2,0.
Thus we can compute using base 3x3 pattern we identified.
Base pattern P[r][c] where r,c in {0,1,2}:
r0: c0 A, c1 B, c2 A
r1: c0 B, c1 A, c2 A
r2: c0 A, c1 A, c2 B
Now compute missing
... [1124 chars truncated]
"A restorer replaces missing tiles in a Roman mosaic floor by deducing the small repeating unit that generates the entire design."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A mosaic floor of colored tesserae arranged in a strictly periodic pattern — one rectangular section has crumbled away, exposing bare stone (black) beneath.
Do: Identify the smallest rectangular tile unit from the surviving mosaic. Lay new tesserae into the gap following the same phase alignment, and present only the replacement section.
Grid: Colored cells are tesserae; black cells are the crumbled gap. Output dimensions match the missing rectangle.
"A signals officer deciphers a garbled section of an encrypted message by recognizing the cipher key repeats on a fixed grid cycle."
120b: k=1
See: An encoded message grid of colored symbols tiling in a rigid repeating key — but one rectangular block was lost to radio interference, replaced by static (black).
Do: Recover the key's dimensions from the intact transmission. Apply the repeating key to reconstruct the garbled block and relay only the restored portion to command.
Grid: Colored cells form the repeating cipher grid. Black cells are the interference gap. The output is the decrypted block.
We need to infer the puzzle. We have a description: repeating key grid, black cells are missing block. Output is the restored block. Training example: Input grid 4x4? Let's see. Example 1 Input: A M . M M A M A A M A M M A M A Output: A So input is 4x4 with a single black cell (.) at position (row1,col3). The rest are A and M pattern. Output is just "A". So the restored block is a single cell? The missing block is black cell; we need to reconstruct what should be there based on repeating pattern. The pattern appears to be a checkerboard of A and M? Let's examine: rows: Row1: A M . M Row2: M A M A Row3: A M A M Row4: M A M A If we ignore the black cell, pattern seems to be alternating A and M like a chessboard where top-left is A. Indeed typical checkerboard: (i+j) even => A, odd => M. Let's test: Row1 col1 (i=0,j=0) even => A matches. col2 (0+1=1) odd => M matches. col3 would be even => A, but it's black. col4 odd => M matches. Row2 col1 (1+0=1) odd => M matches. col2 even => A matches. So pattern holds. So missing cell should be A. Output is A. So rule: Identify repeating pattern (like a tiling) and fill missing black cells with appropriate color based on pattern, then output only the restored portion (maybe the block of black cells replaced). In example, only one black cell, output that cell's color. Now test input: Provided grid 7x7? Let's count rows: Row1: A B A A . . . Row2: B A A B . . . Row3: A A B A . . . Row4: A B A A B A A Row5: B A A B A A B Row6: A A B A A B A Row7: A B A A B A A So 7 rows, each 7 columns. There are black cells (.) in first three rows columns 5-7? Let's map. Row1 columns: 1 A,2 B,3 A,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 . Row2: 1 B,2 A,3 A,4 B,5 .,6 .,7 . Row3: 1 A,2 A,3 B,4 A,5 .,6 .,7 . Rows4-7 have no black cells (full of A/B). So missing block is a rectangular region? The black cells form a 3x3 block at top right? Actually rows1-3, cols5-7 are all black. That's a 3x3 rectangle. Goal: Determine repeating key dimensions from intact transmission (the rest of grid). The pattern likely repeats with some period (maybe 2x2 or 3x3). Need to infer pattern using the known cells and then fill the missing 3x3 block accordingly. Then output only the restored block (the 3x3 colors) as grid. We need to find the repeating pattern. Let's examine rows4-7 (full). They may reveal the tile. Rows4: A B A A B A A Row5: B A A B A A B Row6: A A B A A B A Row7: A B A A B A A Looks like pattern of A and B maybe like a larger repeating tile. Let's try to see if it's a 4x4 tile? Let's compute maybe a 2x2? Let's check parity: If we treat A as 0, B as 1 maybe? Let's see if pattern is like a chessboard? Row4 col1 A (even sum 0) maybe A, col2 B (odd) B, col3 A (even) A, col4 A (odd?) but odd would be B if chessboard, but it's A. So not simple checkerboard. Maybe pattern is a 3x3 tile? Let's attempt to find smallest repeating rectangle that fits rows4-7 and columns1-7. We can attempt to see periodicity in rows: Compare row4 and row ... [7074 chars truncated]
"A stage manager re-blocks a scene after a lighting rig failure blacks out one section, inferring positions from the perfectly mirrored blocking pattern elsewhere."
120b: k=1
See: A stage grid where colored spotlight pools repeat in a precise periodic arrangement — but one rectangular zone has gone completely dark (black) from a blown fuse.
Do: Study the surviving spotlight pattern to determine the repeating blocking unit. Determine which colors belong in the dark zone and cue only those lights.
Grid: Colored cells are spotlight pools in periodic arrangement. Black cells are the blown-fuse zone. Output is the restored light cues.
We need to infer the puzzle. Input grid with colors and black '.' representing missing zone. Output is a grid? In example 1, input 4x4 with pattern of A and M and '.'? Actually example 1 input: A M . M M A M A A M A M M A M A Output: A So output is just a single character? That seems odd. Maybe the task is to output the color that should fill the black zone? In example, there is a single '.' at position (0,2). The pattern is a checkerboard of A and M. The missing cell should be A? Let's see pattern: coordinates (row+col) even maybe A? Let's compute: (0,0) A, (0,1) M, (0,2) ., (0,3) M. So pattern maybe alternating A and M like a chessboard but not exactly because (0,3) M matches (0,1) M (both same parity). Let's check (1,0) M, (1,1) A, (1,2) M, (1,3) A. So indeed it's a checkerboard where (row+col) even = A, odd = M. At (0,2) sum=2 even => A. So output A matches. Thus the task: given a grid with a rectangular region of black cells (maybe contiguous rectangle), we need to infer the periodic pattern and fill the rectangle with appropriate colors, then output the filled rectangle? But output in example is just a single character because rectangle size 1x1. So output is the subgrid that was black, filled with correct colors. Now test input: we have a grid 7x7? Let's count rows: lines: A B A A . . . B A A B . . . A A B A . . . A B A A B A A B A A B A A B A A B A A B A A B A A B A A That's 7 rows, each 7 columns. Black region appears as '.' in top right corner maybe a rectangle of size 3x3? Let's map coordinates (row, col). Row0: columns 4,5,6 are '.' '.' '.' (positions 4-6). Row1: same columns 4-6 '.' '.' '.'. Row2: same columns 4-6 '.' '.' '.'. Rows 3-6 have no '.'. Thus black rectangle is rows 0-2, cols 4-6 (3x3). Need to determine pattern of colors elsewhere, which seems periodic. Let's examine pattern of A and B (only two colors). Likely a checkerboard pattern but maybe with some offset. Let's write grid with coordinates. I'll create matrix: r0: c0 A, c1 B, c2 A, c3 A, c4 ., c5 ., c6 . r1: B A A B . . . r2: A A B A . . . r3: A B A A B A A r4: B A A B A A B r5: A A B A A B A r6: A B A A B A A We need to infer periodic tiling. Let's look at pattern of A/B across whole grid ignoring blacks. Maybe it's a 2x2 repeating block? Let's examine rows 3-6 (full). Write them: r3: A B A A B A A r4: B A A B A A B r5: A A B A A B A r6: A B A A B A A Observe maybe pattern of size 3? Let's try to see if it's a 3x3 tile repeated. Take subgrid rows3-5, cols0-2: Rows3-5, cols0-2: r3: A B A r4: B A A r5: A A B That's a 3x3 pattern. Does it repeat to the right? Let's check cols3-5 for same rows. Rows3-5, cols3-5: r3 cols3-5: A B A r4: B A A r5: A B A? Wait r5 col3 = A, col4 = A, col5 = B => A A B (actually row5 col3 A, col4 A, col5 B) So pattern matches? Row5 col3-5 = A A B which matches row5 col0-2 = A A B. Good. Row4 col3-5 = B A A matches row4 col0-2 = B A A. Row3 col3-5 = A B A matches row3 col0-2 = A B A. So 3x3 tile repeats horizontally. N ... [2133 chars truncated]
"A groundskeeper reseeds a rectangular bare patch in a formal garden by matching the strict color rotation of the surrounding flower beds."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A parterre garden where flower colors repeat in a small fixed pattern across rows and columns — but one rectangular bed has died off, leaving bare earth (black).
Do: Determine the planting pattern's repeat dimensions from the living flowers. Plant the dead bed with the correct species to continue the pattern, and list only the replanted section.
Grid: Colored cells are flower species tiling periodically. Black cells are the dead patch. Output is the replanting plan for the bare rectangle.
See: The input grid contains a black background with one or more vertical pairs of same-colored non-black cells. Each pair consists of two cells of the same color in the same column, separated by exactly one row between them. The row between the two cells of each pair is entirely black. All pairs use the same color.
Do: 1. Create an output grid with double the width and double the height of the input, filled entirely with black cells. 2. Copy the entire input grid into the top-left quadrant of the output (rows 0 to H-1, columns 0 to W-1, where H and W are the input height and width). 3. For each vertical pair of colored cells, fill the entire row between them (across the full output width) with green (G). 4. Create a diagonal copy: copy the input grid again into the bottom-right quadrant (rows H to 2H-1, columns W to 2W-1). 5. For each vertical pair in this copied region, again fill the entire row between them (across the full output width) with green (G).
Grid: The output grid is exactly twice the height and twice the width of the input grid. The background is black. Green separator rows span the full width of the output grid. The input content appears in the top-left quadrant, and a shifted copy appears in the bottom-right quadrant, forming a diagonal tiling pattern.
"A mirror placed at the corner of a room doubles the world, and every doorway gets a welcome mat."
120b: k=2
See: On a dark stage, pairs of colored lanterns hang in vertical columns, each pair separated by a single dark gap—like eyes peering through a slot. They all glow the same hue, watching and waiting.
Do: The stage expands diagonally: the original scene sits in one corner, and its echo appears in the far opposite corner, as if reflected in a mirror placed at the room's center. Wherever two lanterns stare at each other across a dark gap, a green carpet unrolls between them—not just beneath their feet, but stretching wall to wall across the entire widened stage. Each pair of watchful eyes earns its own green bridge, in both the original scene and its echo.
Grid: The new stage is twice as tall and twice as wide as the original, mostly darkness. The original performance occupies one corner, its twin occupies the diagonal opposite corner, and vivid green runways cut horizontally across the full width wherever paired lanterns face each other.
We need to understand the transformation. Let's parse description: Input grid with colored lanterns (non-black?) placed in vertical columns, each pair separated by a single dark gap. They all glow same hue, watching and waiting. So input likely has pairs of same color in same column with a dot between them? Let's examine examples. Example1 Input (3x3): Row1: . A . Row2: . . . Row3: . A . So there are two A's in column 2? Actually column indices: col1 ., col2 A, col3 .; row2 all ., row3 col2 A. So A's are vertically aligned with a gap of one row between them (row2). So they are a pair separated by a single dark gap. They are same hue (A). Output is 6x6 (twice dimensions). Let's view output. Output rows (6): 1: . A . . . . 2: G G G G G G 3: . A . . . . 4: . . . . A . 5: G G G G G G 6: . . . . A . Let's map coordinates. The original 3x3 placed in top-left corner? Let's see top-left 3x3 of output: Rows1-3, cols1-3: Row1: . A . Row2: G G G Row3: . A . But output row2 col1-3 are G G G, not . . . . So they inserted a full row of G across entire width (6) at row2 (the row between the two A's). Indeed original had gap row2 (all .). In output, that row becomes all G across width. Also original top-left 3x3 appears unchanged except that row2 is now G row across width. Also there is a copy (echo) placed in opposite corner (bottom-right). Let's examine bottom-right 3x3 (rows4-6, cols4-6): Rows4-6, cols4-6: Row4: . A . Row5: G G G Row6: . A . Matches same pattern. Indeed output rows4-6, cols4-6 replicate original pattern (with G row). Also there are other cells: rows4-6, cols1-3 and rows1-3, cols4-6 are mostly . except some A's? Let's see output row4: ". . . . A ." Actually row4 col5 is A (since original A at column2 row1? Wait). Row4 is ". . . . A .": So there is an A at column5 (col5). That's part of the echo? In echo, original A's are at column5? Let's compute: Echo placed at bottom-right corner offset by (original rows, cols). Original size 3x3, output size 6x6. So echo origin at row4, col4 (since 3+1). In echo, the A's should be at (row4+0, col4+1) = (4,5) and (row4+2, col4+1) = (6,5). Indeed row4 col5 A, row6 col5 A. Good. So echo works. Now also there is a G row across full width at row5 (the row between the two A's in echo). Indeed row5 is all G. Thus rule: For each column where there are two same-colored non-blank cells separated by exactly one blank cell (i.e., pattern color, blank, same color vertically), we create a full horizontal line of G across entire output grid at the row corresponding to the blank row (i.e., the middle row). Also we duplicate the original pattern into opposite corner (mirror across both axes). The output grid is double size (2x width and height). The original pattern placed top-left, the copy placed bottom-right. The rest is filled with . except the G rows (full width) at appropriate rows (both for original and copy). Also maybe there are multiple columns with such pairs; each pair yields a G row (maybe multiple rows). ... [7142 chars truncated]
"A cell undergoes mitosis along its diagonal axis, and wherever chromosomes face each other across the cytoplasm, a band of chlorophyll bridges the divide."
120b: k=2
See: A cellular organism with paired organelles hovering one membrane apart in the same column.
Do: The cell divides diagonally, producing a twin shifted to the opposite corner. Every membrane between paired organelles floods with chlorophyll across the full body.
Grid: The organism doubles in both dimensions. The original cell occupies one corner, its clone the opposite. Green membranes stretch wall to wall wherever paired organelles flank a gap.
We need to infer rule. Let's analyze examples. Example1 Input grid 3x3? Actually given: . A . . . . . A . So 3 rows, 3 columns. Output appears larger: let's count rows. Output lines: . A . . . . G G G G G G . A . . . . . . . . A . G G G G G G . . . . A . That's 6 rows, 6 columns. So doubled dimensions (2x). Input placed in corners? Original cell occupies one corner, its clone opposite. In output, original pattern appears at top-left? Let's map. Input has A at (0,1) and (2,1) (using 0-index). So two A's in same column (col1) rows 0 and 2, with a gap between them (row1). That's "paired organelles hovering one membrane apart in same column". So they are vertical pair with a dot between. Output: size 6x6. Let's see where A's appear. Output lines: Row0: ". A . . . ." Row1: "G G G G G G" Row2: ". A . . . ." Row3: ". . . . A ." Row4: "G G G G G G" Row5: ". . . . A ." So there are four A's now: two in left half (rows0,2 col1) same as original positions but shifted? Actually original grid 3x3 doubled to 6x6. Possibly each cell becomes 2x2 block? Let's see mapping: Input cell at (0,1) becomes output at (0,1) and also at (3,4)? Wait there is A at row3 col4 (0-index). That's opposite corner relative to original? Let's compute: original grid size N=3. Output size 2N=6. The original pattern appears in top-left quadrant (rows0-2, cols0-2?) Actually output rows0-2, cols0-2 contain pattern? Row0 col1 A, row2 col1 A. That's same as input positions within top-left 3x3 region. Indeed rows0-2, cols0-2 correspond to original grid scaled? Let's check other cells: Input had '.' elsewhere. Output top-left region rows0-2 cols0-2: rows0: ". A .", row1: "G G G"? Wait row1 col0-2 are G G G, not '.' . So transformation adds green rows between? Actually row1 is all G across entire width, not just left region. Observation: The output has horizontal rows of G across entire width at rows 1 and 4 (every other row). Those correspond to "membranes between paired organelles flood with chlorophyll across the full body". The paired organelles are vertical pair with a gap. The membrane between them is the row between them (row1 in input). In output, that row becomes a full row of G across entire grid (both halves). Similarly, after duplication, there is also a second pair? The clone at opposite corner also has a vertical pair? In output, there are A's at rows3-5? Actually rows3-5 contain A at (3,4) and (5,4). That's a vertical pair in right half (col4). The gap between them is row4, which is G row across entire width. So duplication created a copy of the original pattern shifted to opposite corner (bottom-right). So rule: take input grid, double dimensions (both axes). Place original pattern in top-left quadrant (size N x N). Also place a copy rotated? Actually same orientation placed in bottom-right quadrant (offset N rows, N cols). The gap rows between paired A's become rows of G across whole width, both in top-left region and bottom-right region? In output, the G rows are a ... [6483 chars truncated]
"A constellation duplicates itself at the far diagonal of an expanding universe, and wherever binary stars face each other, a nebular band of green light stretches across the entire sky."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sky with binary star pairs one row apart in the same column.
Do: The sky doubles. The constellation appears in one quadrant and its twin in the opposite. A green nebula fills the full row between each binary pair.
Grid: Doubled cosmos. Identical constellations on the diagonal. Green nebulae span the full width between binary stars.
"A captain charts the same route twice on a doubled map, once from port and once from the far corner, and between every pair of buoys, a seaweed line drifts across the full channel."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark sea chart with paired buoys one row apart in the same lane.
Do: Double the chart. Plot the original route top-left and its echo bottom-right. Between each pair of buoys, a line of seaweed stretches from shore to shore.
Grid: Doubled chart. Two identical routes on the diagonal. Green seaweed lines run the full width between paired buoys.
"A circuit board is tiled diagonally on a doubled substrate, and wherever two components share a trace one row apart, a ground plane of copper-green floods the entire row."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark PCB with paired components one row apart in the same column.
Do: Double the board. Place the original layout top-left and a copy bottom-right. Flood entire rows with a green ground plane between paired components.
Grid: Doubled substrate. Two identical layouts on the diagonal. Green ground planes span full width between component pairs.
"The gods duplicate their temple on the opposite corner of Olympus, and between every pair of sacred pillars, a vine of divine emerald grows unbroken across the heavens."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark firmament with paired sacred pillars one tier apart in the same column.
Do: Olympus doubles in expanse. The temple appears in one corner and its divine echo in the far corner. Emerald vines grow across the full width between paired pillars.
Grid: Doubled realm. Two identical temples on the diagonal. Green vines span full width between each pair of pillars.
"A troupe performs the same routine twice on a diagonally expanded stage, and wherever two dancers face each other across one empty row, a ribbon unfurls across the entire floor."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with paired dancers one row apart in the same column.
Do: Double the stage. The first performance fills one corner, the reprise fills the opposite. Green ribbons unfurl across the full width between facing dancers.
Grid: Doubled stage. Two identical performances on the diagonal. Full-width green ribbons between every pair of facing dancers.
"A mineral vein replicates along the diagonal of a doubled cross-section, and wherever two crystals face each other across a fault line, a stratum of green serpentine fills the gap from edge to edge."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark rock cross-section with paired crystals one layer apart in the same column.
Do: Double the cross-section. The original vein sits in one corner, its replicate in the opposite. Green serpentine strata fill entire rows between paired crystals.
Grid: Doubled cross-section. Two identical veins on the diagonal. Green serpentine layers span the full width between crystal pairs.
"A chef plates the same dish twice on a diagonal, and between every pair of garnishes, a stripe of pesto is drizzled across the entire table."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A plate with matched garnishes sitting one row apart in their columns, like paired capers on a dark tasting board.
Do: Duplicate the plate onto a board twice the size, once in the upper-left and once in the lower-right. Between each pair of garnishes, spread pesto across the full width of the board.
Grid: The board is doubled in both directions. Two identical platings sit diagonally opposed. Pesto lines run edge to edge between paired garnishes.
"A melody echoes in canon from the opposite corner of the concert hall, and wherever two notes bracket a rest, a drone of strings sustains across every seat."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A sparse score with paired notes separated by a single silent measure in the same voice.
Do: The score doubles its staves and measures. The original phrase sits in one corner; its echo in the other. Every rest flanked by twin notes becomes a full-width sustained drone.
Grid: Twice the staves, twice the measures. Two copies of the phrase sit diagonally. Sustained green drones fill entire rows between bracketing notes.
"The playing field expands for a tournament rematch in the far corner, and between every pair of goal posts, the groundskeeper paints a vivid line across the entire pitch."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark field with pairs of same-colored posts planted one row apart in their lanes.
Do: Expand the field to double dimensions. Replay the formation in the opposite corner. Paint a bright line across the full width between each pair of posts.
Grid: Double-sized pitch, black grass. Original formation top-left, rematch formation bottom-right. Bright green lines span the full width between paired posts.
"A storm system clones itself on the diagonal, and wherever twin lightning bolts frame a calm row, an aurora sweeps unbroken from horizon to horizon."
120b: k=1
See: A dark sky with vertical pairs of bright flashes separated by one calm row in the same column.
Do: The sky doubles in expanse. The original storm holds one corner; its echo takes the far corner. Between each pair of flashes, an aurora fills the row from edge to edge.
Grid: Doubled sky. Two identical storm patterns on the diagonal. Full-width auroras glow between every pair of lightning strikes.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Actually example input: ". A ." ". . ." ". A ." That's 3 rows, 3 columns. Output is 6 rows, 6 columns? Let's see output lines: ". A . . . ." "G G G G G G" ". A . . . ." ". . . . A ." "G G G G G G" ". . . . A ." That's 6 rows, each 6 columns. So doubled size (2x). Input pattern appears in top-left quadrant? Let's map. Input coordinates (r,c) 0-index. Positions with A at (0,1) and (2,1). So vertical pair separated by one row (row1). That's like description: vertical pairs of bright flashes separated by one calm row in same column. Output: size 6. The original storm holds one corner; its echo takes the far corner. So original pattern appears in top-left? Let's see top-left 3x3 of output: Rows0-2, cols0-2: Row0: . A . Row1: G G G Row2: . A . Matches input but with row1 filled with G instead of . . . . Wait input row1 was all . but output row1 is G G G. That's the aurora row between flashes, full width across the quadrant (edge to edge). So rule: between each pair of A vertically, fill the row between them with G across entire width of the quadrant. Also there is a second identical storm pattern on the diagonal (far corner). In output bottom-right 3x3 (rows3-5, cols3-5): Rows3-5, cols3-5: Row3: . . . . A . But need extract columns3-5: columns 3,4,5: row3 values: . A .? Wait row3 is ". . . . A .": that's 6 columns. So columns3-5 are positions 3,4,5: col3='.', col4='A', col5='.'. So pattern matches A at (row3, col4) which corresponds to original A at (0,1) shifted to bottom-right corner (offset +3 rows, +3 cols). Row5: ". . . . A .": same A at (5,4). Row4 is "G G G G G G": full G row across entire width, corresponds to aurora between the two A's in that quadrant (rows3-5). Indeed row4 is all G. Thus transformation: double dimensions (2x). Place original pattern in top-left quadrant. Also copy it to bottom-right quadrant (i.e., shift by N rows and N cols where N = original size). Fill rows that are between the two A's (i.e., the row(s) that are exactly between the two A's vertically) with G across entire width of each quadrant. Also maybe fill columns? Not in example. Also note that there is also a column of A's? In input there are two A's same column. In output, the bottom-right quadrant also has same column offset (col offset +3). So column of A's stays same relative within quadrant. Now test input: 4x4 grid: Row0: W . . . Row1: . . . . Row2: W . . . Row3: . . . . So size N=4. Two W's (maroon) vertical pair same column (col0) separated by one row? Actually rows0 and2 have W, with row1 between them (row1 is .). So separation of one row (row1). There is also row3 empty. Thus pattern similar: vertical pair of W with one row between. We need to double size to 8x8. Place original pattern in top-left 4x4 quadrant. Also copy to bottom-right 4x4 quadrant (rows4-7, cols4-7). Fill the row between the two W's (i.e., row1 of original) with G across entire width of each quadrant. In example, they ... [3229 chars truncated]
"A building's blueprint is tiled diagonally across an expanded lot, and wherever two windows face each other across a floor, a green awning runs the entire length of the facade."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark facade with paired windows one story apart in the same column.
Do: Double the lot in both directions. Place the original blueprint top-left and a copy bottom-right. Install awnings spanning the full building width between paired windows.
Grid: Twice the height and width. Two identical facades on the diagonal. Green awnings stretch edge to edge between window pairs.
"A general deploys the same formation twice on a diagonal battlefield, and between every pair of sentries facing each other, a wall of shields stretches across the entire front."
120b: k=1
See: A dark battlefield with pairs of sentries posted one row apart in their columns.
Do: Expand the battlefield to double size. Place the original formation in one corner and its mirror deployment in the far corner. Between paired sentries, a shield wall spans the full width.
Grid: Doubled terrain. Two formations on the diagonal. Unbroken green shield walls run edge to edge between facing sentries.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 3x3? Actually example input: ". A ." ". . ." ". A ." That's 3 rows, 3 columns. Output is 6x6? Let's see output lines: ". A . . . ." "G G G G G G" ". A . . . ." ". . . . A ." "G G G G G G" ". . . . A ." That's 6 rows, each 6 columns. So doubled size (2x). Original formation placed in top-left corner? Let's map. Original input positions of A (azure) at (0,1) and (2,1) (0-index). In output, top-left 3x3 region? Let's see output rows 0-2, cols 0-2 correspond to original? Row0 col0-2: ". A ." matches original row0. Row1 col0-2: "G G G" but original row1 was ". . .". So not same. Actually they placed original formation in top-left corner but also added green rows between sentries? Let's analyze description: pairs of sentries posted one row apart in their columns. In input, A's are in same column (col1) rows 0 and 2, one row apart (row1 between). So they are sentries. Transformation: expand battlefield to double size. Place original formation in one corner and its mirror deployment in far corner. Between paired sentries, a shield wall spans full width. So output 6x6: original formation (the A's) placed in top-left corner? Let's locate A's in output: positions: (0,1) same as original top-left? also (2,1) same? Actually output row0 col1 = A, row2 col1 = A. So original A's remain at same relative positions within top-left 3x3 block. Good. Mirror deployment in far corner (bottom-right). Mirror of original across both axes? So we expect A's also at bottom-right block (rows 3-5, cols 3-5) mirrored. Let's see output: there are A's at (3,4) and (5,4). Indeed row3 col4 = A, row5 col4 = A. That's column offset 3 (since original col1 -> 1+3=4). Row offset 3 (0->3,2->5). So mirrored (same orientation) placed in opposite corner. Now shield walls (green G) run edge to edge between facing sentries. Between each pair of sentries (original and mirror?) Actually between paired sentries (original pair) there is a row of G across full width. In output, row1 (index1) is all G across 6 columns. That's between original sentries rows 0 and 2 (original pair). Also between mirrored pair rows 3 and5 there is row4 all G. Indeed row4 is all G. So rule: For each column where there are two sentries separated by exactly one row (i.e., a pair with a row between), after doubling, we insert a full row of G between the rows of the pair (i.e., at the row that is halfway between them in the doubled grid). Since size doubled, the original rows are spaced with one empty row between them? Actually after doubling, original rows are at same indices (0,2, etc) but there is an extra row inserted between each original row? Not exactly; they kept original rows at same indices, but added new rows of G at index1 and 4. So they inserted rows of G at positions that are one row after the first sentry row? Let's think: original pair rows 0 and2. In doubled grid, they occupy rows 0 and2 (same). The row between them is row1, which they fill wi ... [3461 chars truncated]
"The same scene is staged twice on a diagonal split stage, and wherever two spotlights bracket an empty row, a green curtain drops across the full proscenium."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark stage with paired spotlights one row apart in the same wing.
Do: Double the stage. The first scene plays top-left, the encore bottom-right. A curtain falls across the full width between every pair of spotlights.
Grid: Stage doubled in both dimensions. Twin scenes sit diagonally. Green curtains span the full width between spotlight pairs.
"A gardener plants the same bed twice along the diagonal of a doubled plot, and between every pair of blooms sharing a trellis, a hedge of ivy is trained across the full width."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A dark plot with paired flowers one row apart on the same trellis column.
Do: Expand the garden to double dimensions. Plant the original bed top-left and a copy bottom-right. Train ivy hedges across the full width between paired blooms.
Grid: Doubled garden. Two identical beds on the diagonal. Full-width ivy hedges grow between every pair of flowers.
See: The input grid has an azure (A) background containing one or more rectangular regions of colored pattern (repeating motifs of a non-azure color on every other cell). Exactly two grey (X) marker cells appear on one edge of the grid, positioned two cells apart from each other along that edge. The X markers always sit on the outermost row or column.
Do: 1. Locate the two X marker cells. They will be on the same edge (top row, bottom row, left column, or right column), spaced 2 cells apart. 2. Determine the axis the X markers define: if they are on the top or bottom row, the axis is vertical (columns); if on the left or right column, the axis is horizontal (rows). 3. Halve the grid along that axis, splitting it into two equal parts. If the axis is vertical, split into a left half and right half; if horizontal, split into a top half and bottom half. 4. Keep the half that contains the X markers; discard the other half. 5. In the kept half, replace every X cell with azure (A). The result is the output grid.
Grid: The input grid has even dimensions along the axis being halved (so it splits cleanly in two). The output grid is exactly half the size of the input along the halved axis and the same size along the other axis. The background color is azure (A). The colored pattern regions and their internal spacing are preserved unchanged in the output, except that X markers become A.
"A pair of scissors snips along the dotted line, and the scrap paper falls away."
120b: k=1
See: An azure canvas stretches out, decorated with repeating tapestry patterns woven in various colors. Somewhere along one edge, two grey pins have been pressed into the frame — a perforation mark, like the tear-here dots on a coupon.
Do: The two pins mark where the scissors should cut. They whisper which direction to slice — across or down — like a dotted line on wrapping paper. Cut the canvas in half along that line. The half with the pins is the keeper; the other half flutters to the floor like a trimmed margin. Once you've kept your piece, pull out the pins and patch the tiny holes with azure, leaving no trace they were ever there.
Grid: The canvas is always sized so the scissors cut cleanly in two — no ragged edges. The kept piece is exactly half the original in one direction, unchanged in the other. The woven tapestry patterns survive the cut perfectly intact; only the pin-holes vanish.
We need to infer rule. From description: canvas azure (A) background, repeating tapestry patterns in various colors. Two grey pins (X) mark where to cut. They indicate direction across or down. Cut canvas in half along that line. The half with the pins is kept; other half discarded. Then remove pins (replace with azure A). So output is half of input (the half containing X's) with X replaced by A. We need to determine orientation: cut line is across (horizontal) or down (vertical) depending on arrangement of X's? In example, input grid size? Let's parse example 1. Input appears 20 rows? Let's count rows: Provided lines: 1: X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 3: X B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 4: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 5: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 6: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 7: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 8: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 9: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 10: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 11: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 12: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 13: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 14: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 15: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 16: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 17: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 18: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 19: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 20: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 21: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Actually there are 21 rows? Let's count lines: after row 20 maybe 21. Output has 10 rows? Output lines: 1: A A ... (20 columns) 2: A A ... 3: A B A B... 4: A A... 5: A B... 6: A A... 7: A B... 8: A B... 9: A A... 10: A B... So output is 10 rows, half of 20? Input maybe 20 rows, but we counted 21. Let's recount: maybe first line is row0? Let's count again with numbers: 1 X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 3 X B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 4 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 5 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 6 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 7 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 8 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 9 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 10 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 11 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 12 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 13 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 14 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 15 A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 16 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 17 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 18 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 19 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 20 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 21 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Actually there are 21 rows, but output has 10 rows. Maybe cut is vertical? Let's examine columns: Input width 20 columns. Output width also 20 columns. So cut is horizontal, halving row ... [7846 chars truncated]
"Two enzyme markers bind to the membrane wall, triggering mitosis in reverse — the cell cleaves along the marked axis, and only the half bearing the binding sites survives, its scars healing over with fresh cytoplasm."
120b: k=2
See: A living cell with organelles scattered across its interior and two enzyme markers embedded in one wall of its membrane.
Do: The cell divides along the axis the enzymes indicate, and the half carrying the enzymes persists while the other half dissolves. The enzyme sites heal over, becoming indistinguishable from the membrane.
Grid: The output is half the input along the marked axis. Enzyme markers become background.
We need to understand the puzzle. The description: "cell with organelles scattered across its interior and two enzyme markers embedded in one wall of its membrane. The cell divides along the axis the enzymes indicate, and the half carrying the enzymes persists while the other half dissolves. The enzyme sites heal over, becoming indistinguishable from the membrane. Grid details: The output is half the input along the marked axis. Enzyme markers become background." So we have input grid with some markers (maybe X?) that indicate axis. The output is half the input along that axis, and the markers become background (i.e., replaced by the background color). Need to infer which axis (horizontal or vertical) based on markers. Look at Example 1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: Provided lines: appears 20 rows (since output has 10 rows). Input rows: list lines: 1: X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 2: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 3: X B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 4: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 5: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 6: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 7: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 8: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 9: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 10: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 11: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 12: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 13: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 14: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 15: A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B 16: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 17: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 18: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 19: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 20: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Output has 10 rows, each 20 columns? Let's see output lines: first line: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A (20). So output is 10 rows, 20 columns. So they halved vertically (i.e., kept top half? Actually which half contains the markers?). The markers X appear in input at positions: row1 col1 is X, row3 col1 is X. Also maybe other X? Only those two? So markers are in first column (leftmost) at rows 1 and 3. They are embedded in one wall of its membrane (i.e., left wall). So axis is vertical line? The cell divides along the axis the enzymes indicate. The half carrying the enzymes persists while the other half dissolves. So we keep the half that contains the markers (X). In example 1, markers are on left side (column 1). So we keep left half? But output is 10 rows (half height) not half width. Wait we need to examine: Input 20 rows, output 10 rows. So they halved along horizontal axis (top vs bottom). Which half contains the markers? Markers are at rows 1 and 3 (top). So top half kept. Indeed output rows correspond to rows 1-10 of input? Let's compare: Output row1 is all A's (matches input row2? Actually input row1 had X at col1 then A's. Output row1 is all A's, no X. So X turned into background (A). Output row2 is all A's (matches in ... [5653 chars truncated]
"Two binary pulsars orbit at the edge of a galaxy. Their synchronized pulses trigger a gravitational shear that bisects the galaxy — the far arm spirals into the void, while the pulsar-side endures. The pulsars themselves collapse into dark matter, invisible against the cosmic background."
120b: fail
See: A galaxy with star clusters in repeating patterns and two pulsars positioned at one rim.
Do: The galaxy is sheared in half along the pulsar axis. The far half disperses. The pulsars go dark.
Grid: Output is the pulsar-side half. Pulsar positions become empty space.
We need to infer rule. From description: galaxy with star clusters repeating patterns and two pulsars positioned at one rim. Shear in half along pulsar axis. Far half disperses. Pulsars go dark. Output is pulsar-side half. Pulsar positions become empty space. Interpretation: Input grid contains two special cells (pulsars) maybe marked X (grey). In examples, X appears at certain positions on one side (rim). Output removes half of grid beyond the line through those X's, keeping side with pulsars? Actually "pulsar-side half" meaning keep side containing pulsars, discard other half. Pulsars become empty (maybe turned to .? but in outputs they become A? Let's examine. Example1: Input size 20x20? Actually 20 rows, each row 20 columns. X appears at (row1,col1) and (row3,col1?) Let's see first row: "X A A A ..." So X at (0,0). Also row3: "X B A B ..." X at (2,0). So two X's at leftmost column rows 0 and 2. Output: size 10x20? Actually output rows 10, columns 20. They kept right half? Let's see output first row: all A's (no X). So they removed left half? The pulsars were on left rim, so pulsar-side half is left side? But output doesn't contain X, they become empty space (maybe removed). Output dimensions: 10 rows (half of 20). So they cut horizontally? Wait they kept rows? Input 20 rows, output 10 rows. So they cut along vertical axis? Actually they kept top half? Let's see which rows are kept: Output rows correspond to rows 0-9 of input? Let's compare row0 input: X A A ... Output row0: A A A ... (X removed). Row1 input: A A A ... Output row1: A A A ... matches. Row2 input: X B A B ... Output row2: A B A B ... (X removed). So they kept rows 0-9 (first half). So they cut horizontally at row10? The pulsars are at rows 0 and 2 (top). So pulsar-side half is top half. So they cut along horizontal line through pulsars? "Sheared in half along the pulsar axis." Pulsars positioned at one rim (top). Axis maybe vertical line through them? But they cut horizontally. Let's examine Example2: Input 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. X appears at (0,9) and (2,9) maybe? Row0: ... X at col9. Row2: ... X at col9. So rightmost column top rows. Output size 10x10 (rows 0-9). So they kept top half again. Pulsars on right rim, but they cut horizontally, keeping rows 0-9. So rule: keep the half of grid that contains the pulsars (they are on one side of the grid, i.e., top side). Remove the other half (bottom). Also remove the pulsar cells (replace with empty? In outputs they just omitted them because they are cut off? Actually X cells were in rows kept, but they become something else: In Example1, X at (0,0) and (2,0) were in kept rows, but output shows A at those positions (since X replaced by A?). Wait output row0 col0 is A (since first row all A). So X turned into A (maybe background color of that row). In Example2, X at (0,9) and (2,9) are in kept rows. Output row0 col9 is A (since row0 ends with A). So X replaced by A. So pulsars become empty space? But they become A (az ... [3638 chars truncated]
"Two buoys bob at one edge of the nautical chart. The harbormaster draws a line between them and declares everything beyond the channel's midpoint off-limits — that half of the chart is torn away and discarded. The buoys are then erased, their purpose served."
120b: fail
See: A nautical chart with shoal markings in repeating patterns and two buoys along one margin.
Do: Tear the chart in half along the buoy axis, keep the buoy side, and erase the buoy symbols.
Grid: Output is the buoy-side half with buoy marks replaced by open water.
We need to infer rule. Metaphor: nautical chart with shoal markings in repeating patterns and two buoys along one margin. Tear chart in half along buoy axis, keep buoy side, erase buoy symbols. So input grid has buoys (maybe X?) along one margin? In example, input is 20x20? Actually given lines: first line "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" length 20. So grid 20x20. Output is 10 rows? Actually output shows 10 rows? Let's count output lines: they list 10 rows. Yes output is half height? They "tear chart in half along the buoy axis" maybe vertical axis? Keep buoy side. Buoys along one margin maybe leftmost column? In input, first column has X in rows 1,3, etc. Let's examine input pattern: Row1: X A A ... Row2: A A A ... Row3: X B A B ... Row4: A A A ... Row5: A B A B ... Row6: A A A ... Row7: A B A B ... Row8: A B A B ... Row9: A A A ... Row10: A B A B ... Row11: A B A B ... Row12: A A A ... Row13: A B A B ... Row14: A A A ... Row15: A B A B ... Row16: A A A ... Row17: A A A ... Row18: A A A ... Row19: A A A ... Row20: A A A ... So first column has X in rows 1,3 maybe others? Row1 X, row3 X, row5 A, row7 A, row9 A, row11 A, row13 A, row15 A, row17 A, row19 A. So only two X's? Actually row1 and row3 have X. That's two buoys? The metaphor says two buoys along one margin. So X marks buoys. So we need to cut along buoy axis: maybe vertical line through the column containing buoys? Keep buoy side (the side containing buoys) and erase buoy symbols (replace X with something like open water '.'? In output, there is no X; first column becomes A? Let's see output first row: "A A A A ..." So X replaced by A? Actually output row1 first element is A (since they removed X). So they replaced X with A (maybe background). So they kept the side that includes the column with X? But they also removed rows beyond half? Output has 10 rows, which is half of 20 rows. So they cut horizontally? "Tear the chart in half along the buoy axis" maybe axis is horizontal line through buoys? Buoys are along one margin (left side). So axis is vertical line? But they cut in half along that axis, meaning cut the grid in half horizontally? Actually they kept buoy side (the side containing buoys) which would be left side of the chart? But output width is still 20 columns (same as input). So they didn't cut columns. They cut rows: keep top half? Let's see which rows are kept: Output rows correspond to rows 1-10 of input? Let's compare row1 output: all A's (20). Input row1 had X then many A. After removing X becomes A, matches. Row2 output: all A's matches input row2 (all A). Row3 output: "A B A B ..." matches input row3 after X replaced with A. Row4 output: all A matches input row4. Row5 output: "A B A B ..." matches input row5 (which had A B pattern). Row6 output: all A matches input row6. Row7 output: "A B A B ..." matches input row7 (which had A B pattern). Row8 output: "A B A B ..." matches input row8 (which had A B pattern). Row9 output: all A matches input row9. Row10 output ... [1456 chars truncated]
"Two test probes touch down on one edge of the circuit board. A voltage spike along their axis fries every trace beyond the midpoint — that half of the board goes dead and is snapped off. The probe contacts are soldered over, flush with the copper ground plane."
120b: fail
See: A PCB with repeating component patterns and two probe contact points on one edge.
Do: The board is split at its center along the probe axis. The dead half is removed. Probe points are soldered flat.
Grid: Output is the probe-side half. Probe locations become ground plane.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid 20x20? Actually given lines: first line "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 20 entries. So 20x20 grid. Output is 10x20? Let's count output lines: appears 10 lines. Yes output is half height (10 rows) same width 20. So rule: split at center along probe axis (maybe vertical axis?). The description: board split at its center along the probe axis. The dead half is removed. Probe points are soldered flat. Output is the probe-side half. Probe locations become ground plane. Interpretation: Input has two probe contact points on one edge. In example, maybe there are X's representing probe points? In input, first row starts with X then many A. Also third row starts with X B A B... So X maybe probe points? In output, those X's are gone? Output first row is all A (no X). So the half containing X's is removed? Let's see: Input rows 1-20. Output rows 1-10 correspond to rows 11-20? Let's compare: Input rows 11-20 (starting from row 11): row11: "A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B" matches output row3? Wait output row3 is "A B A B ..." yes. Output row1 is "A A A ..." which matches input row12? Row12 is "A A A ..." yes. So output rows correspond to bottom half (rows 11-20) of input. So they removed top half (rows 1-10). The "probe side half" is bottom half? The probe points maybe on top edge (X). So they keep the side with probe? Actually they removed dead half (maybe top). So rule: take bottom half of grid (rows after middle). Also maybe need to replace any X (probe) with A (ground plane). In output there is no X. In bottom half there were no X originally. So just cropping. Thus transformation: given input grid, output the lower half (rows floor(n/2)+1 to n). If odd? Not needed. Now test input: 4 rows, 8 columns. Need to output bottom half: rows 3-4? Since 4 rows, half is 2 rows. Bottom half rows 3 and 4. Input rows: 1: "A W A W A X A X" 2: "A A A A A A A A" 3: "A W A W A W A W" 4: "A A A A A A A A" So output rows 3 and 4 unchanged. Thus output: Row1: A W A W A W A W Row2: A A A A A A A A Check if any X present? No. So final. Provide grid with spaces.
"Two runes are carved into one wall of the labyrinth. When read aloud, the labyrinth folds upon itself — the far half crumbles to dust, leaving only the corridors nearest the inscriptions. The runes fade into the stone, their magic spent."
120b: fail
See: A labyrinth with patterned mosaics on its floors and two glowing runes on one outer wall.
Do: The labyrinth collapses its far half. The rune-bearing half remains. The runes extinguish.
Grid: Output is the rune-side half with rune positions returning to bare stone.
We need to infer rule. Description: labyrinth collapses its far half, rune-bearing half remains, runes extinguish. So input grid has two halves? The outer wall with two glowing runes on one outer wall. So likely there is a vertical line of X (grey) representing runes? In examples, we see X's at certain positions. Example1 input is 20x20? Actually 20 rows, 20 columns. Output is 10 rows? Wait output has 10 rows? Let's count: Output lines: appears 10 rows. Indeed output is half height (top half?) Let's examine example1: Input first row: "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". That's 20 columns. Second row all A. Third row: "X B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B A B". So X at column1? Actually first char X then B A B... So X at column1. Many rows have X at column1? Let's see rows: row5 "A B A B ..." no X. Row7 "A B A B ..." etc. Row9 all A. Row10 "A B A B ..." etc. Row13 "A B A B ..." etc. Row15 "A B A B ..." etc. Row17 all A. Row18 all A. Row19 all A. Row20 all A. Output: 10 rows, each 20 columns? Let's count first output row: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" 20 columns. Output rows count: appears 10 rows. So they collapsed far half: maybe they kept top half (first 10 rows) and removed bottom half (last 10 rows). Also they removed X's (runes) turning them to A (bare stone). Indeed in output row1 column1 is A not X. Row3 column1 is A not X. So they removed X's. Thus rule: take top half of grid (first N/2 rows) and replace any X with A (or maybe with background color of that half). Keep other colors unchanged. Check example2: Input is 20x10? Actually 20 rows, 10 columns. Output is 10 rows, 10 columns. Let's see input first row: "A A A A A A A A A X". X at column10. Row2: "A O A O A O A O A A". Row3: "A A A A A A A A A X". So X at column10 rows 1,3,5? Actually row5 all A. Row7 has O pattern etc. So X's appear at column10 in rows 1,3,9? Let's see. Output first row: "A A A A A A A A A A" (no X). So they removed column10? Wait output still has 10 columns, but X replaced by A? In output row1 column10 is A (since all A). So they kept same width, just removed X's (replace with A). Also they kept top half rows (first 10 rows). Input rows 1-10 become output rows 1-10. Indeed output row1 corresponds to input row1 but X changed to A. Row2 same as input row2 unchanged. Row3 input had X at col10, output row3 col10 A. Row4 same. Row5 all A unchanged. Row6 all A unchanged. Row7 same as input row7 (O pattern). Row8 all A unchanged. Row9 same as input row9 (O pattern). Row10 all A unchanged. So rule matches: keep top half rows, replace X with A. Example3: Input is 16 rows? Actually count: rows listed 16? Let's count: rows 1-16? Actually there are 16 rows listed? Let's count: lines: 1: A A ... (30 columns). 2: A A ... (30). 3: A A G ... (30). 4: A A A ... (30). 5: A A G ... (30). 6: A A A ... (30). 7: A A G ... (30). 8: A A A ... (30). 9: A A G ... (30). 10: A A A ... (30). 11: A A G ... (30). 12: A A A ... (30). 13: A A G ... (30). 14: X A A ... (30). 15 ... [1260 chars truncated]
"Two dancers freeze in position at one wing of the stage. The choreographer claps — the ensemble retreats, and the stage itself contracts to half its width toward the frozen pair. They bow out, replaced by empty floorboard."
120b: fail
See: A stage with dancers arranged in repeating formations and two dancers frozen at one wing.
Do: The stage halves along the axis of the frozen dancers, keeping their side. They exit, leaving bare floor.
Grid: Output is the frozen-dancer side. Their positions become bare stage.
We need to infer rule. From description: "stage halves along the axis of the frozen dancers, keeping their side. They exit, leaving bare floor." So there are two frozen dancers at one wing. The stage halves along axis of frozen dancers, keeping their side. They exit, leaving bare floor. Means we take half of grid that contains the frozen dancers? Let's examine examples. Example1: Input is 20x20? Actually lines count: seems 20 rows, each 20 columns. Output is 10 rows? Let's count output rows: appears 10 rows, each 20 columns? Wait output lines: first line "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 20 columns. Number of rows: output shows 10 rows. So output is top half? Let's see input: there are X's at (row1,col1) and (row3,col1) etc? Actually first row: "X A A A ..." So first column has X at rows 1,3,5? Let's examine pattern: Input seems to have X at (1,1) and (3,1) and maybe (??). Also there are X at (??). The "frozen dancers" maybe X's? They are grey. In example1, X appears at (1,1) and (3,1) and maybe others? Let's scan: row1 col1 X, row3 col1 X, row? row? also row? there is X at row? Actually row5 col? Not. So two X's in first column rows 1 and 3. They are "frozen dancers". The stage halves along axis of frozen dancers, keeping their side. Which side? The side containing the X's? They exit, leaving bare floor (maybe replace X with A?). Output: first two rows become all A (no X). Indeed output rows 1-2 are all A. So X's removed. Also output rows count reduced to 10 (half). Which half? Probably the side that does NOT contain X? Wait we kept side with X? The description: "keeping their side. They exit, leaving bare floor." Means we keep the side that contains the frozen dancers, but they exit (so become blank/ground). So we keep that half, but remove X's (replace with background color maybe A). Output rows 1-10 correspond to rows 1-10 of input? Let's compare: Input rows 1-10: rows 1-10 include X at rows1,3. Output rows 1-10: row1 all A (X replaced), row2 all A (was all A), row3 becomes "A B A B ..." which matches input row3 after X removed? Input row3: "X B A B A B ..." Output row3: "A B A B ..." So X replaced with A. Row4 unchanged. Row5: input row5 "A B A B ..." output row5 same. So indeed output is first 10 rows (top half) with X replaced by A. So rule: take top half (including the frozen dancers side) and replace X with background color (maybe the most common color? In example1 background is A). So output size is half rows (maybe number of rows divided by 2). The axis is horizontal? The frozen dancers are at left side? Actually they are at column1, not row. But halving along axis of frozen dancers: maybe vertical axis (column) because X's are in column1 (leftmost). Halving along axis of frozen dancers (vertical line through them) keeping their side (left side). But output kept top half not left half. Wait rows halved, not columns. So maybe frozen dancers are at top? Let's examine example2. Example2 input is 20x10? Actually rows 20, c ... [7077 chars truncated]
"Two fault markers are exposed in one cliff face of the canyon. A seismic event splits the plateau along their axis — the far half calves away like an iceberg. Erosion smooths the marker outcrops until they are indistinguishable from the surrounding bedrock."
120b: fig alone solves
See: A geological cross-section with mineral vein patterns and two exposed fault markers on one face.
Do: The formation splits at its midline along the marker axis. The far half falls away. The markers erode flush.
Grid: Output is the marker-side half with marker positions weathered to match the surrounding rock.
"Two cloves pressed into the crust mark where the chef's knife will fall. The blade bisects the pastry along their line, and the garnished half is plated while the other returns to the kitchen. The cloves are plucked before serving."
120b: fail
See: A decorated pastry with two clove studs pressed into one edge, and various frosted patterns across the surface.
Do: Slice through the pastry along the axis the cloves define, plate only the half that bore the cloves, and remove them before serving.
Grid: Output is the clove-bearing half with cloves replaced by plain crust.
We need to infer rule. Metaphor: pastry with two clove studs pressed into one edge, slice along axis the cloves define, keep half that bore the cloves, remove them. So input grid has two special markers (cloves) maybe X? In examples, X appears as grey. In example1 input, there are X at (0,0) and (2,0) maybe? Actually first row starts with X then many A. Also row3 starts with X? Let's examine example1: grid size 20x20? Output is 10x20? Actually output has 10 rows, 20 columns. Input had 20 rows, 20 columns. So they cut in half (preserve half that contains the X's). The X's are at left edge column 0 rows 0 and 2? Also maybe other X's? In input example1, there are X at (0,0) and (2,0) and also maybe other X's? scanning: row0 col0 X, row2 col0 X, row? also row? there is X at row? Actually row? Not many. So two X's define an axis (line) maybe vertical? They are on same column (left edge). Slice along axis they define: maybe line connecting them (vertical line). Keep half that bore the cloves (the side containing the X's). Remove them (replace with plain crust i.e., A). Output shows only rows 0-9 (top half) of original? Let's see output rows correspond to first 10 rows of input? Input rows 0-9: rows 0-9 include X at row0 col0, row2 col0, etc. Output row0 is all A (no X). Indeed X replaced by A. Output rows 0-9 correspond to input rows 0-9 but with X replaced by A. Also note that input rows 10-19 are discarded. So they kept top half (rows 0-9). The axis defined by the two X's is vertical line at column0? But they kept the half that contains the X's (left side). However they also cut horizontally? Actually they kept top half, not left half. Wait X's are on left edge, same column, but they kept rows 0-9 (top half). So maybe the axis is defined by the two X's positions: they are at (0,0) and (2,0). The line connecting them is vertical segment from row0 to row2 at column0. The axis direction is vertical, so slice along that axis (i.e., cut horizontally across the pastry, perpendicular to axis?). The metaphor: "Slice through the pastry along the axis the cloves define" Means cut along the line defined by the two cloves (i.e., cut along that line). Then "plate only the half that bore the cloves" So keep the side that contains the cloves. If you cut along the line connecting the two X's (vertical line), then you would cut the grid into left and right halves? Actually cutting along a vertical line would separate left side (maybe column0) from right side (columns 1+). The half that contains the cloves would be the left side (including column0). But output kept many columns (20) not just column0. So maybe they cut perpendicular to the axis: slice through pastry along the axis the cloves define (i.e., cut across the pastry perpendicular to the axis? ambiguous). Let's examine other examples. Example2: Input 20x10? Actually rows 20, columns 10. X appears at (0,9) and (2,9) maybe? Row0 col9 X, row2 col9 X. Also maybe other X's? Output is 10x10 (first 10 rows). Indeed ... [8268 chars truncated]
"Two tuning pegs sit at one end of the instrument's neck. When tightened, they silence everything beyond the halfway fret, leaving only the resonance closest to the headstock. The pegs themselves fall silent, blending into the wood."
120b: fail
See: A stringed instrument with vibrating patterns along its body and two special tuning pegs mounted on one end.
Do: The pegs define which end is kept. Everything past the midpoint is muted. The pegs themselves become inert wood.
Grid: The half nearest the pegs remains; the rest vanishes. Peg positions become background.
We need to infer rule. Metaphor: stringed instrument with vibrating patterns along its body and two special tuning pegs mounted on one end. Pegs define which end is kept. Everything past the midpoint is muted. Peg positions become background. Interpretation: Input grid contains two special cells (pegs) maybe marked X? In examples, X appears as grey. In example1, input grid 20x20? Actually 20 rows, 20 columns. X appears at (row1,col1) and (row1,col? Actually first row: "X A A A ..." first cell X. Also row3: "X B A B ..." first cell X. So two X's in column1 rows1 and3? Also maybe other X's? Let's examine example1: first row starts with X then many A. second row all A. third row starts with X then pattern B A B... So there are two X's at (1,1) and (3,1). Those are the "pegs". Output: those X's become A (background) and the half nearest the pegs remains; rest vanishes. Output grid is 10 rows? Actually output shows 10 rows (since after transformation half size?). Let's count output rows: lines: 10 rows. So they cut the grid in half (nearest the pegs). The pegs are on left side (column1). So they keep left half (including pegs) and discard right half. Output width is 20? Actually output rows have 20 entries? Let's count first output row: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 20 columns. So width unchanged. Height reduced from 20 to 10 (half). So they kept top half? Wait pegs are at rows 1 and 3 (top). The "half nearest the pegs" maybe means keep rows up to midpoint (i.e., top half) because pegs are near top? Actually pegs are at left side, not top. But they said "two special tuning pegs mounted on one end." Could be at one end of instrument (left side). The half nearest the pegs remains; the rest vanishes. So we keep columns nearest the pegs (left half). But output still has 20 columns, not 10. So maybe they keep rows, not columns. Let's examine: In output, rows 1-10 correspond to original rows 1-10? Let's compare original rows 1-10: rows 1-10 of input: row1 starts with X then A's. Output row1 is all A's (no X). Row2 all A matches. Row3 input starts with X B A B... Output row3 is "A B A B ..." (X replaced by A). Row4 input all A, output row4 all A. Row5 input "A B A B ..." output row5 same. Row6 input all A output row6 all A. Row7 input "A B A B ..." output row7 same. Row8 input "A B A B ..." output row8 same. Row9 input all A output row9 all A. Row10 input "A B A B ..." output row10 same. So indeed output rows 1-10 correspond to input rows 1-10, with X replaced by A (background). Rows 11-20 are omitted. So they kept top half (nearest the pegs?) But pegs were at rows 1 and 3 (top). So the half nearest the pegs is top half. So rule: Identify the two X cells; they are in same column? In example1 they are in column1 rows1 and3. The "end" is the side where pegs are located (top side). Keep the half of the grid that is closer to that side (i.e., rows up to midpoint). Discard the other half. Also replace X with background color (maybe the most co ... [2381 chars truncated]
"Two referees stand at one sideline, arms raised. At their signal the pitch splits down the center parallel to their position — only their half of the field stays in play, the other half swallowed by fog. The referees step off the line and disappear into the crowd."
120b: fail
See: A playing field with formations of players arranged in patterns, and two referees positioned along one boundary line.
Do: The field is halved along the axis the referees define. The active half is the one nearest the referees. The referees then vacate their positions.
Grid: Output is the referee-side half, with referee positions replaced by empty field.
We need to infer rule. Input grid 20x20? Example 1 input is 20 rows each 20 columns. Output is 10 rows? Let's count output rows: appears 10 rows. Indeed output is half height. The description: two referees positioned along one boundary line. Halve along axis the referees define. Active half nearest referees. Referees then vacate positions. So we need to find two special elements that act as referees. In example, which elements are referees? Look at input: there are X's at positions (row1 col1) and (row3 col1) maybe? Actually first row: "X A A A ..." So first cell is X. Row3 starts with "X B A B ..." So there are X at (1,1) and (3,1). Also maybe other X? scanning: only those two X's? Also maybe other X's elsewhere? Not in rest. So two X's along left boundary column (col1). They define axis: line through them? They are on same column, so axis is vertical line? Halve along axis the referees define. The active half is nearest the referees. Since referees are on left side, the half nearest them is left half of grid (columns 1-10). Output is left half (10 columns) and rows? Output has 10 rows, not 20. Wait they also halved along axis defined by referees: maybe axis is horizontal line connecting them? They are at rows 1 and 3, same column. So line connecting them is vertical segment. Halve along that axis? Could be we cut the grid in half perpendicular to the line connecting referees? Let's examine output: It has 10 rows and 20 columns? Actually output rows show 20 entries? Let's count first output row: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 20 columns. So output retains full width but half height (10 rows). So they cut horizontally, keeping rows nearest referees (top half). Indeed referees are near top (rows 1 and 3). So active half is top half (rows 1-10). Output rows 1-10 of input, but with X replaced by A? Let's compare: Input rows 1-10: rows 1-10 as given. Output rows 1-10: row1 output is all A's (no X). Input row1 had X at col1 then A's. Output row1 replaced X with A. Row2 unchanged (all A). Row3 output: "A B A B ..." (starting with A not X). Input row3 had X at col1 then B A B... So X replaced with A. Row4 output all A matches input row4 all A. Row5 output "A B A B ..." matches input row5 (which started with A B...). Row6 output all A matches input row6 all A. Row7 output "A B A B ..." matches input row7 (starts with A B...). Row8 output "A B A B ..." matches input row8 (starts with A B...). Row9 output all A matches input row9 all A. Row10 output "A B A B ..." matches input row10 (starts with A B...). So rule: take top half (rows 1-10) because referees on left side near top define active half as nearest. Remove referees (replace with background color? maybe the color of the majority? In example they replaced X with A (azure). So maybe replace with the color that fills the rest of that row? The background is A. So we replace X with A. Thus transformation: Identify two X's on left boundary (or maybe any color) that are on same column? T ... [1413 chars truncated]
"Two lightning rods stand on the roof's edge, and when the storm breaks, a curtain of rain erases everything on the far side of the building. The rods, their work done, rust into the same grey as the slate beneath them."
120b: fail
See: A rooftop with weathervanes and tile patterns, plus two lightning rods mounted along one edge.
Do: A storm wipes away the half of the structure opposite the rods. The rods corrode into the roofing material.
Grid: The rod-bearing half persists; rods become indistinguishable from the roof surface.
We need to infer rule. Metaphor: rooftop with weathervanes and tile patterns, plus two lightning rods mounted along one edge. Storm wipes away half opposite the rods. Rods corrode into roofing material. So input grid has some pattern representing roof and rods along one edge. Output retains half with rods, other half removed (maybe set to background color?). Let's examine examples. Example1: Input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 20 rows (since output has 10 rows?). Actually output shows 10 rows. Input has 20 rows. So transformation reduces height by half? Let's see: Input first row: "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". Output first row: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". So first row changed: X replaced by A. So maybe the half opposite rods is removed (set to roof color A). The rods are maybe X? In input, there are X at some positions: first row first column X, third row first column X, etc. Let's locate pattern: In example1, there are X at (row1,col1), (row3,col1), maybe also other X? Actually row3: "X B A B A B ..." So X at col1. Row? Also row? Row? Let's see row? Row? The pattern seems that X appears in first column of rows 1,3,? maybe also row? Row? Row? Let's list rows with X: row1 col1 X, row3 col1 X, maybe row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Row? Not many. Output has no X; they become A. So X maybe rods? But rods corrode into roof (A). So they become A. Also output size is half rows (10) compared to input (20). So storm wipes away half opposite rods: maybe keep top half (where rods are) and discard bottom half? Let's see: Input rows 1-20, output rows 1-10 correspond to rows 1-10 of input after transformation? Let's compare row2 input: "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" output row2 same. Row3 input: "X B A B A B ..." output row3: "A B A B A B ..." So X replaced by A. Row4 input: "A A A ..." output row4 same. Row5 input: "A B A B ..." output row5 same. So output rows 1-10 correspond to input rows 1-10, with X replaced by A. So transformation: keep top half (first N/2 rows) and replace X with A (rod corrode). Discard bottom half rows (rows 11-20). Indeed output has only 10 rows. Check example2: Input size? Let's count rows: appears 20 rows as well (since output 10 rows). Input first row: "A A A A A A A A A X". Output first row: "A A A A A A A A A A". So X at last column replaced by A. Row2 input: "A O A O A O A O A A" output row2 same. Row3 input: "A A A A A A A A A X" output row3: "A A A A A A A A A A". So X replaced by A. So again top half rows kept, X replaced by A. Bottom half rows (rows 11-20) are discarded. Indeed output rows 1-10 correspond to input rows 1-10. Thus rule: Input grid of even number of rows, with some special color X representing rods along one edge (maybe left or right). Output is top half of grid (first N/2 rows) with all X replaced by A (the roof color). That's it. Now test input: Provided grid: Rows: 1: "A W A W A X A X" 2: "A A A A A A A A" 3: "A W A W A W A W" 4: "A A A A A A A A" So 4 rows. To ... [587 chars truncated]
"Two keystones are embedded in one facade of the cathedral. The master builder declares the wing beyond the nave redundant — it is demolished, and the keystones are plastered over to match the surrounding wall."
120b: fail
See: A cathedral floor plan with repeating column patterns and two special keystones set into one outer wall.
Do: Demolish the half of the building opposite the keystones. Plaster over the keystones so they blend with the wall.
Grid: Output is the keystone-side half with keystones rendered as plain wall.
We need to infer rule. The description: cathedral floor plan with repeating column patterns and two special keystones set into one outer wall. Demolish half opposite keystones. Plaster over keystones so they blend with wall. Output is keystone-side half with keystones rendered as plain wall. Interpretation: Input grid has pattern columns repeating, with two special cells (keystones) on one outer wall (maybe leftmost column?). Need to output half of grid that contains keystones, after removing opposite half and turning keystones into wall color (maybe background). Let's examine example. Input grid size? Let's count rows: Provided lines: first line "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" that's 20 columns? Let's count: X then 19 A's =20. Number of rows: list lines: appears 20 rows. So 20x20 grid. Output grid: appears 10 rows? Let's count output lines: there are 10 lines. Indeed output is half height? Actually output lines: first line "A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A" (20 columns). Then second line same. Third line "A B A B ..." pattern. So output is 10 rows (half of 20). So they kept top half? Which side contains keystones? Let's locate keystones in input: The special keystones maybe X cells? In input there are X at (row1,col1) and also at (row3,col1?) Actually first line starts with X then A's. Row3: "X B A B A B ..." starts with X at col1. Also maybe other X elsewhere? Row1 col1 X, row3 col1 X. Those are two X cells on leftmost column (outer wall). So keystones are X cells on left wall. The rule: keep the half of the grid that contains the keystones (i.e., left side? Actually half opposite keystones is demolished, so we keep the side with keystones). But output is 10 rows, not columns. Wait half opposite keystones maybe vertical half? Let's think: Cathedral floor plan with repeating column patterns and two special keystones set into one outer wall. So outer wall is left side (column). Keystones are at two positions on that wall. Demolish half of building opposite the keystones (i.e., the right half). So we keep left half (including keystones). Then plaster over keystones so they blend with wall (i.e., replace X with A, the wall color). Output is keystone-side half with keystones rendered as plain wall. Thus we need to take left half of grid (columns 1..10) and replace X with A. Output should be 20 rows? But output has 10 rows. Hmm maybe they also cut rows? Let's examine output rows correspond to which rows? Input rows 1-20. Output rows 1-10 correspond to rows that had X? Actually rows with X are rows 1 and 3. Output includes rows 1-10, which are top half of grid (rows 1-10). So maybe the keystones are on top wall (row1?) Wait X at (row1,col1) and (row3,col1). That's not top wall. But maybe the outer wall is top? Let's examine pattern: The grid seems to have repeating columns of A and B pattern after first two rows. The first two rows are all A (except X at row1 col1). So maybe the keystones are on top wall (row1) and row3? Not consi ... [3527 chars truncated]
"Two signal flags are planted along the front line. The general orders a strategic withdrawal: everything beyond the midfield is ceded to the enemy. The flags are struck and the posts left bare so the enemy cannot read the retreat's intent."
120b: fail
See: A battlefield with troop formations and two signal flags posted along one edge.
Do: Retreat from the far half, keeping only the territory nearest the flags. Remove the flags from their posts.
Grid: The flag-side half remains. Flag positions become empty ground.
We need to infer rule. From description: "battlefield with troop formations and two signal flags posted along one edge. What to do: Retreat from the far half, keeping only the territory nearest the flags. Remove the flags from their posts. Grid details: The flag-side half remains. Flag positions become empty ground." Interpretation: Input grid contains flags (maybe X?) along one edge? In examples, there are X's at certain positions (grey). They seem to be flags. The rule: keep only the half of grid that is nearer to the flags (i.e., the side of the grid containing the flags), discard the far half (remove rows/columns beyond middle?). Also remove the flags themselves (replace X with something else, maybe background color A?). Let's examine Example1. Input grid size? Let's count rows: appears 20 rows (since output has 10 rows). Input rows 20, output rows 10. So they halved vertically, keeping top half? Let's see where X's are. In Example1 input first row: "X A A A ..." first cell X then many A. Row 3 has X at start? Actually row3: "X B A B ..." first cell X. Row? Also there are X's maybe at column 1? Let's examine pattern: X appears at column1 in rows 1,3,? Also maybe other X's? In input, row1 col1 X, row3 col1 X, row? Row? Row? Not many X's. Output first row is all A (no X). So X removed. Output rows count 10, which is half of 20. Which half kept? Let's compare content. Input rows 1-20. Output rows correspond to rows 1-10? Let's see output row1: all A. Input row1: X A A ... after removing X becomes A A A... matches output row1 (all A). Output row2: all A matches input row2 (all A). Output row3: "A B A B ..." matches input row3 after removing leading X? Input row3: X B A B A B ... after removing X, shift? Actually output row3 starts with A then B etc. Input row3 after X removed would start with B, not A. Wait output row3 first element is A, second B, third A... So maybe they also removed column1 entirely (the flag column). So they cut off the flag side column(s) and keep the rest? Let's examine. Input row3: columns: 1 X, 2 B, 3 A, 4 B, 5 A, 6 B... Output row3: columns: 1 A,2 B,3 A,4 B,... So output row3 corresponds to input columns 2-? but with column2 B becomes column2 B, column3 A becomes column3 A, etc. But output column1 is A, not B. So maybe they also set the flag positions to A (background) rather than removing column. Let's compare: Input row3 col2 = B, output row3 col1 = A (different). So maybe they shifted left after removing column1? Let's test: If we drop column1, then output row3 col1 would be B (from input col2). But it's A. So not shift. Maybe they kept only the half of grid nearest the flags, meaning the side containing flags is kept, but the flags themselves become empty (maybe replaced by A). The "half" refers to vertical half (top vs bottom) because flags are along one edge (maybe left edge). In Example1, flags (X) are on left edge (column1). So we keep left half of grid (columns near flags) and discard right half. Output wid ... [4403 chars truncated]
"Two stagehands pin marks on one edge of the curtain. When the cue comes, the curtain is cut along its center seam and the unmarked half drops into the pit. The pins are pulled from the surviving drape, leaving no trace of the cut."
120b: fail
See: A grand curtain with embroidered patterns and two small pins along one selvedge edge.
Do: Cut the curtain in half along the axis the pins indicate, drop the unpinned half, and remove the pins from what remains.
Grid: Output is the pinned half, pin locations replaced by curtain fabric.
We need to understand the puzzle. The metaphor: curtain with embroidered patterns and two small pins along one selvedge edge. Cut the curtain in half along the axis the pins indicate, drop the unpinned half, and remove the pins from what remains. Output is the pinned half, pin locations replaced by curtain fabric. Interpretation: Input grid contains a pattern (curtain) and two pins (maybe special color X?). The pins are along one edge (selvedge). The axis indicated by pins: maybe a line through the two pins? The curtain is cut in half along that axis, and we keep the half that contains the pins? Actually "drop the unpinned half" meaning we keep the half that has the pins. Then "remove the pins from what remains" meaning replace pin cells with the underlying fabric (maybe the pattern that would be there if pin removed). So output is the half of the grid that contains the pins, with pins replaced by whatever pattern is in that half. Thus we need to identify pins: likely X (grey) as per examples. In Example1 input, there are X at (row1 col1?) Let's examine Example1 input: first row: "X A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A". So X at (0,0). Also later rows have X at other positions: row3 (index2) "X B A B A B ..." X at (2,0). So there are two X's in first column (col0) at rows 0 and 2. Those are the pins along one selvedge edge (left edge). So axis indicated by pins: maybe a vertical line through those pins? But they are on the edge, so axis is vertical line at column0? Cutting curtain in half along that axis would split grid into left half (col0) and right half (col1+). Since pins are on left edge, the pinned half is the left side? But output in Example1 is 10 rows by 20 columns? Wait input is 20 rows by 20 columns? Actually input appears 20 rows each 20 columns. Output is 10 rows by 20 columns? Let's count output rows: they list 10 rows. Indeed output has 10 rows, each 20 columns. So they cut the curtain in half horizontally? Let's examine: pins are at (0,0) and (2,0) - two pins not aligned horizontally. Maybe the axis is horizontal line through the pins? But pins are on left edge, maybe they indicate a horizontal cut line across the grid at the row of the pins? There are two pins at rows 0 and 2, maybe they indicate the cut line is between rows? Let's see output rows: they kept rows 0-9? Actually output rows correspond to first half of input (top half). Input had 20 rows; output has 10 rows (top half). So they cut horizontally in half, keep top half (pinned half). The pins are on left edge of top half? Indeed pins at rows 0 and 2 are within top half. So the pins indicate the axis: maybe the line connecting the two pins (vertical line? Actually they are at same column, different rows, so line is vertical segment along left edge. The axis to cut is horizontal line that passes through the midpoint between the pins? Not sure. But the rule seems: Find the two X cells on the border (edge). They are on same column (left edge). The line connecting them ... [7977 chars truncated]
"Two stakes are driven into the soil at one border of the garden. Come autumn, the gardener folds the plot in half along their line and mulches everything on the far side. The stakes are pulled up, leaving only soft earth behind."
120b: fail
See: A garden plot with various plantings in repeating rows, and two wooden stakes along one edge.
Do: Fold the garden at its midline toward the stakes, discard the far half, and pull out the stakes.
Grid: The stake-side half of the garden remains. Stake holes fill with soil.
We need to infer rule. Description: garden with repeating rows, two wooden stakes along one edge. Fold at midline toward stakes, discard far half, pull out stakes. Stake-side half remains. Stake holes fill with soil. Interpretation: Input grid has two columns of X (grey) representing stakes? In examples, X appears in leftmost column? Let's examine Example1 input: first row: "X A A A ...". So first column has X at row1, also row3 has X at start? Actually row3: "X B A B ..." So X appears at column1 rows 1,3,? Also later rows maybe none. Output: first column no X, all A etc. So X removed? Output grid is smaller: 10 rows vs 20? Input 20x20? Output 10x20? Let's check dimensions. Example1 input appears 20 rows, each 20 columns. Output appears 10 rows, each 20 columns. So they folded vertically (top-bottom?) Actually they kept stake-side half. Stakes are along one edge (maybe left edge). The X's are at leftmost column, representing stakes. They fold at midline toward stakes (i.e., fold the right half onto left half). Then discard far half (the part that was folded over). Pull out stakes (remove X). Stake holes fill with soil (maybe fill with the color that was overlapped). So result is left half of grid (including stakes) after folding, with overlapped cells combined? Let's test. In Example1, input 20 rows, output 10 rows. So folding along horizontal midline (mid row) not vertical. Stakes along one edge (maybe top edge?). X appears in rows 1 and 3 at column1. That's not along top edge. Hmm. But output rows count halved, columns same. So fold horizontally (top half onto bottom half) or bottom onto top? The stake side half remains. Stakes are along one edge (maybe top edge). X appears in first row (top edge) and third row (also near top). So stakes along top edge. So we fold along horizontal midline (mid row) towards the stakes (top). So we fold bottom half up onto top half, overlapping. Then discard far half (the bottom half after folding). Pull out stakes (remove X). Stake holes fill with soil (the overlapped cell's color replaces X). So final grid is top half (rows 1-10) after overlay of bottom half rows onto them (mirrored vertically). Let's test with Example1. Input rows 1-20. Top half rows 1-10. Bottom half rows 11-20. When folding upward, row 11 maps onto row10, row12 onto row9, etc. Let's compute overlay rule: For each cell, if top cell is X (stake), after pulling out stake, fill with the overlapped bottom cell's color? Or maybe if top cell is X, replace with bottom cell's color; else keep top cell? Let's test with Example1 row1 col1 is X. Bottom counterpart row20 col1? Row20 is "A A A ...". So bottom row20 col1 = A. Output row1 col1 is A (yes). Row3 col1 is X, bottom counterpart row18 col1? Row18 is "A A A ...". Output row3 col1 is A (yes). So that matches. Now other cells: For positions where top cell not X, output should be top cell (since stake removed only). Let's verify row2 col1 is A (top). Bottom counterpart row19 col1 is A. Output ro ... [8752 chars truncated]
See: The input grid contains two hollow rectangles outlined in the same color (e.g., blue, red, or green), one larger and one smaller. Their borders are drawn as single-cell-thick lines of that color. Scattered across the grid, both outside and inside the rectangles, are dots of a second, different color. The rest of the grid is black (background). The interior dots inside the larger rectangle occupy specific positions within its interior.
Do: 1. Identify the two hollow rectangles in the grid. They share the same border color. One is larger than the other. 2. Identify the second color — the color of the scattered dots found outside the rectangles. 3. Extract the larger rectangle (including its border and interior). 4. Replace every cell that uses the rectangle's border color with the scattered-dot color. Interior cells that are black remain black; interior cells that already contain the scattered-dot color remain that color. 5. Output the resulting rectangle as the answer grid.
Grid: The output grid has the same dimensions as the larger rectangle found in the input (height and width matching its bounding box, inclusive of borders). The border of the output is entirely the scattered-dot color. Interior cells are either black (.) or the scattered-dot color, preserving the positions of any dots that appeared inside the larger rectangle in the input.
"A castle's walls absorb the color of the invading army's banners."
120b: k=2
See: Two fortresses stand on a dark battlefield, their walls built from the same stone color. One fortress is grand, the other modest. Scattered across the battlefield like campfires are sparks of a rival color — an invading force that has spread its banners everywhere, even slipping agents inside the fortress walls.
Do: The invaders conquer the larger fortress. Their banners replace every stone in its walls, claiming it entirely. The spies already inside hold their positions. Empty rooms remain empty — the conquest changes the flag, not the furniture. The smaller fortress is forgotten, lost to history.
Grid: The conquered fortress stands alone as the output — same shape, same size, but now every wall stone flies the invader's color. Inside, rooms that were empty stay dark, and any invader agents who had already infiltrated remain where they stood. The fortress's silhouette is unchanged, but its allegiance has shifted completely.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have metaphor: two fortresses built from same stone color. One larger, one smaller. Invaders of rival color spread everywhere, even inside fortress walls. Conquer larger fortress: replace every stone in its walls with invader's color, but keep interior empty cells unchanged, and any invader agents already inside remain. Smaller fortress is ignored. Thus we need to identify two shapes (fortresses) made of same color (stone). Larger shape will be transformed: its border cells become invader color, interior stays same (empty or invader). The invader color is the other color that appears scattered across grid (like "sparks"). In examples, we need to see. Example1 Input: many colors: G (green) appears as border? B (blue) appears as interior? Let's examine. Input grid size? Looks like 13 rows? Actually list: lines show 13 rows? Let's count: lines from Input example1: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . G . ." that's 16 columns. There are 13 rows (since output is 6x7). The output is a shape of size 6x7 with G border and interior '.' and some G inside? Let's view output: Output: G G G G G G G G . . G . . G G . . . . . G G G . G . . G G . . . . . G G G G G G G G That's a shape of a fortress: border G, interior '.' except some internal G at positions (2,4) and (4,2?) Actually row2 col4 is G, row4 col2 is G? Let's map coordinates (1-index). Row1 all G. Row2: G . . G . . G (so G at col1,4,7). Row3: G . . . . . G (col1,7). Row4: G G . G . . G (col1,2,4,7). Row5: G . . . . . G (col1,7). Row6: all G. So shape is like a rectangle with some internal G "walls"? Might correspond to original larger fortress border (stone color) being G? In input, G appears as scattered? Let's examine input: there are many B's forming a big block maybe representing fortress walls? Actually B appears as large rectangle of B's maybe the larger fortress. G appears as scattered points inside and border? Let's look: Input rows (I'll rewrite with coordinates). Row1: ... G at col14? Row2: G at col5. Row3: G at col4, then B's from col9-15? Row4: B at col9, G at col13? Row5: G at col2, G at col6, B at col9, B at col15? Row6: G at col7, B at col9, G at col11, G at col13, B at col15. Row7: B's at col2-8? Actually row7: ". B B B B B B . B B B B B B B ." So B's from col2-8, then dot, then B's col10-15? Row8: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . ." B at col2 and col8. Row9: ". B . . . G B . . . . . . . . ." B at col2, G at col6, B at col7. Row10: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . ." B at col2 and col8. Row11: "G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . ." B from col2-7, G at col1 and col12. Row12: "G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . ." G at col1,8,11,12. So there is a large rectangle of B's roughly rows3-11 columns2-15 maybe? Let's see: B's form a shape maybe like a fortress walls of B (stone). G are scattered inside and also on border? The output shape is G border, interior '.' except some G internal (maybe original G that were inside). Indeed output shows G border (the st ... [9440 chars truncated]
"A host organism's membrane absorbs the pigment of the dominant parasite, while the smaller symbiont withers away unnoticed."
120b: fail
See: Two cell-like enclosures share the same membrane color. A second pigment drifts like spores through the surrounding medium and sometimes lodges inside the cells.
Do: The larger cell undergoes chromatic infection — its membrane adopts the pigment of the free-floating spores. The smaller cell is discarded. Interior spore positions remain fixed within the surviving cell.
Grid: The output is the larger cell's footprint, with every membrane pixel now showing the spore color. Interior pixels keep their original state — either empty cytoplasm or embedded spores.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output is a smaller shape (the larger cell). Let's analyze example 1. We have input with colors: G, B, etc. The description: Two cell-like enclosures share same membrane color. So there are two "cells" (enclosed shapes) with same border color. A second pigment drifts like spores through surrounding medium and sometimes lodges inside the cells. So there are interior pixels of another color (spores) inside cells. What to do: Larger cell undergoes chromatic infection — its membrane adopts the pigment of the free-floating spores. The smaller cell is discarded. Interior spore positions remain fixed within the surviving cell. Thus output is the larger cell's footprint (its shape) with border color changed to spore color, interior unchanged. So we need to detect two enclosed regions (cells) that share same border color. Among them, choose larger (by area). Then output a grid that contains only that region (cropped to its bounding box?) The output in example is 6x7? Let's see. Example output grid: Rows: G G G G G G G G . . G . . G G . . . . . G G G . G . . G G . . . . . G G G G G G G G That's 6 rows, 7 columns. Now look at input to find a region with border G? In input there are many G and B. Let's locate cells: maybe there are two rectangular-ish shapes formed by B border? Actually border color maybe B? Let's examine input lines (I'll rewrite with coordinates). Input grid size? Let's count columns: first line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . G . ." that's 16 columns? Let's count: there are 16 entries. So grid 16x? many rows. We need to find two enclosures sharing same membrane color. In output border is G. So membrane color is G. So there are two G-bordered cells in input. Larger one becomes output with border changed to spore color (which is maybe B? Wait spore color is second pigment that drifts; in example interior spores maybe B? Let's see interior of larger cell: inside there are B pixels (blue) maybe representing spores. Indeed output interior shows '.' for empty cytoplasm and maybe some B? Actually output interior shows '.' and also some G? Wait output interior includes '.' and also some G? Let's examine output rows: row2: G . . G . . G (so border G at left, right, top row all G). interior includes '.' and also a G at column4? That's interior G maybe representing spore? But rule says interior spore positions remain fixed within surviving cell. So interior spore color should be the spore color (maybe B). But output shows G not B. Hmm maybe spore color is also G? Let's examine input: inside larger cell there are B's? Let's locate region. Look at input lines near middle: there is a big block of B forming a rectangle? For example rows 7-9 have many B's. Let's map. I'll index rows 0-? Let's write rows: 0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . 1: . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . 2: . . . G . . . . B B B B B B B . 3: . . . . . . . . B . . G . . B . 4: . G . . . G . . B . . . . . B . 5: . . . . ... [9758 chars truncated]
"The larger nebula's shell ionizes to the wavelength of the scattered pulsars, while the smaller nebula drifts beyond observation."
120b: k=3
See: Two nebula shells drawn in one emission color. Pulsar points of a different wavelength are scattered across the starfield, some embedded within the nebulae.
Do: The larger nebula's shell shifts to the pulsar wavelength. Interior pulsars keep shining. The smaller nebula and external pulsars fade from the observation window.
Grid: Output is the larger nebula's extent — shell pixels in pulsar color, interior pixels either dark space or pulsar-bright.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have input grids with many colors, output is a smaller grid? In example1 input size? Let's count rows: appears 13 rows? Actually example1 input lines: first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . G . ." that's 16 columns. There are 13 rows. Output is 6x7? Output lines: 6 rows, each 7 columns. So output is shape of larger nebula's shell? The description: larger nebula's shell shifts to pulsar color. interior pulsars keep shining. smaller nebula and external pulsars fade. Interpretation: Input contains two "nebula shells" drawn in one emission color (maybe a color like B?). Pulsar points of different wavelength scattered (different color). Larger nebula's shell shifts to pulsar color. Interior pulsars keep shining. Smaller nebula and external pulsars fade. Thus we need to identify larger contiguous region of a particular color (the nebula). Its shell (border) becomes the color of pulsars (another color). Inside region, keep original interior? Actually interior pulsars keep shining (i.e., remain their color). The rest interior maybe become background? Output shows only the larger nebula's extent, with shell colored as pulsar color, interior maybe '.' or pulsar colors. Let's examine example1. Input colors: many B (blue) forming large shape? Also G (green) scattered as points. Output is 6x7 grid with G as border? Output uses G as border color, interior '.' and some G interior? Let's see output grid: Row1: G G G G G G G Row2: G . . G . . G Row3: G . . . . . G Row4: G G . G . . G Row5: G . . . . . G Row6: G G G G G G G So border of shape is all G. Inside there are some G at positions (2,4), (4,2), (4,4). Those correspond to interior pulsars? In input, G points scattered. Let's locate G positions within the larger nebula region. The larger nebula likely is the big B region. The B region shape maybe rectangular? Let's map approximate coordinates. Input 13x16. B region appears as big block of B's forming shape maybe like a donut? Let's quickly sketch: rows with B: Row3: ". . . G . . . . B B B B B B B ." So B from col9-15 (7 B's). Row4: ". . . . . . . . B . . G . . B .": B at col9 and col15. Row5: ". G . . . G . . B . . . . . B .": B at col9 and col15. Row6: ". . . . . . G . B G . G . . B .": B at col9 and col15. Row7: ". . . . . . . . B . . . . . B .": B at col9 and col15. Row8: ". B B B B B B . B B B B B B B .": B from col2-8, then col10-16? Actually col2-8 B, col9 '.' , col10-16 B. Row9: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . .": B at col2 and col7. Row10: ". B . . . G B . . . . . . . . .": B at col2 and col7? plus G at col6. Row11: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . .": B at col2 and col7. Row12: "G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . .": B at col2-7. Row13: "G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . .": B none. So B region forms a shape maybe like a thick border shape? The outermost B's maybe define larger nebula. The interior of that shape includes some G points (pulsars). Output shows shape of size 6x7, which seems to be bound ... [10396 chars truncated]
"The hull of the flagship is encrusted with the bioluminescence drifting through the sea, while the dinghy sinks without a trace."
120b: fail
See: Two vessel hulls outlined in the same paint. Bioluminescent plankton of a different color drift throughout the waters, some inside the hulls.
Do: The flagship's hull planks take on the bioluminescent glow. Plankton trapped inside remain. The dinghy and all plankton outside are lost to the depths.
Grid: Output is the flagship hull — every plank now glowing, interior cells either dark water or luminous where plankton settled.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have metaphor: two vessel hulls outlined in same paint. Bioluminescent plankton of different color drift throughout waters, some inside hulls. What to do: flagship's hull planks take on the bioluminescent glow. Plankton trapped inside remain. The dinghy and all plankton outside are lost to depths. Output is the flagship hull — every plank now glowing, interior cells either dark water or luminous where plankton settled. Interpretation: Input grid contains two shapes (hulls) outlined with same color (maybe a border). Inside each hull there may be cells of another color (plankton). One hull is the flagship (maybe larger?) The output should be the hull shape of the flagship, filled with the plankton color where they were inside, and the hull color replaced by plankton color? Actually "hull planks take on the bioluminescent glow" meaning hull cells become the plankton color. Plankton trapped inside remain (so interior cells that were plankton stay same). The dinghy hull is discarded, and all plankton outside hulls are lost. Thus output is a shape (the hull of flagship) with border color changed to plankton color, interior cells either empty (black) or plankton where originally present. Let's examine Example1. Input grid: many colors: '.' black, G green, B blue. The hull color appears to be B? Let's see: there is a large rectangle of B forming a shape? In input, there is a big block of B forming maybe two hulls? Let's visualize quickly. Rows (I'll index). Row0: ... G . (positions). Row1: ... G ... Row2: ... G ... B B B B B B B . So row2 has B's from col? Let's count columns: there are 16 columns? Actually row strings show 16 entries. Row2: ". . . G . . . . B B B B B B B ." So B from col8 to col14 (7 B). Row3: ". . . . . . . . B . . G . . B ." B at col8 and col14. Row4: ". G . . . G . . B . . . . . B ." B at col8 and col14. Row5: ". . . . . . G . B G . G . . B ." B at col8 and col14. Row6: ". . . . . . . . B . . . . . B ." B at col8 and col14. Row7: ". B B B B B B . B B B B B B B ." Row7 has B from col1-6, then dot, then B from col8-14. Row8: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . ." B at col1 and col6. Row9: ". B . . . G B . . . . . . . . ." B at col1 and col6? Actually row9: ". B . . . G B . . . . . . . . ." B at col1 and col6? Wait there is G at col5, B at col6? Let's count: col0 '.' col1 'B' col2 '.' col3 '.' col4 '.' col5 'G' col6 'B' rest '.'. Row10: ". B . . . . B . . . . . . . . ." B at col1 and col6. Row11: "G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . ." B from col1-6, G at col0 and col11. Row12: "G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . ." G at col0, col7, col10, col11. Output grid is 7x7? Output rows: 6 rows? Actually output shows 6 rows of 7 columns? Let's count: first row "G G G G G G G" (7). There are 6 rows. So output is a 6x7 shape. Interpretation: The flagship hull is maybe the larger rectangular hull formed by B's? Let's identify hull outlines: There is a big rectangular shape of B's maybe forming a border: rows ... [9000 chars truncated]
"The main circuit board's traces are overwritten by the voltage of stray signals, while the daughter board is desoldered."
120b: k=2
See: Two printed circuit boards with traces in the same conductor color. Stray signal points of a different color are scattered across the workbench and both boards.
Do: The main board's traces adopt the stray signal voltage color. Signal points already on the main board persist. The daughter board and all external stray signals are removed.
Grid: Output is the main board — traces in signal color, interior nodes either unpowered (black) or carrying the signal color.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have grid with colors. The metaphor: main board traces adopt stray signal voltage color. Daughter board removed. So likely we have two regions: main board (maybe a shape of a particular color) and daughter board (another shape). Stray signals are other colors scattered. Output is main board region filled with stray signal color, interior nodes either black or signal color. Look at Example1. Input grid large (maybe 13x16?). Output is 6x7 grid. So output is a cropped region (the main board). The output shows only G and . (black). In input, there are G and B and maybe other colors. The main board traces are B? Let's examine. Example1 Input: many rows. I see B forming a rectangular shape maybe? Let's visualize: rows with many B's. There is a big block of B's forming a shape like a board. Also G scattered. Output is a shape of G's forming border? Output grid 6x7 with G border and interior . except some G inside? Let's see output: Row1: G G G G G G G Row2: G . . G . . G Row3: G . . . . . G Row4: G G . G . . G Row5: G . . . . . G Row6: G G G G G G G So shape is like a board with border G, interior . except some interior G at (2,4) and (4,2?) Actually row2 col4 is G, row4 col2 is G, row4 col4 is G? Wait row4: G G . G . . G => positions 1,2,4,7 are G. So interior G at (row4,col2) and (row4,col4). So pattern maybe corresponds to stray signal points (G) that were originally on the main board (B) and they persist. The main board traces adopt stray signal color (G). So the B region becomes G, but any G that were already on B remain G (same). The stray signals outside are removed. The daughter board removed (maybe another color region). So output is just the B region recolored to G, with interior . where there were no stray signals? Wait interior . corresponds to black (unpowered). In input, inside B region there were . (black) cells? Let's check input snippet: there is a region of B's forming a shape with interior . maybe. Indeed rows with B's and . inside. So output shows . where interior was . (black). So rule: Identify the largest contiguous region of a particular color (the "main board") maybe the most frequent non-black color? Then recolor that region to the color of the stray signals (the other non-black color that appears outside the region). Remove other colors. In Example1, colors present: G, B. B is main board (traces). G are stray signals scattered. Output is region of B recolored to G, interior . unchanged. So output shape is the bounding shape of B region (maybe its exact shape). Indeed B region shape appears like a rectangular shape with some holes? Let's verify: Input B region appears as a big block of B's with some . inside. Output shape is 6x7, which may correspond to that B region's shape after cropping to minimal bounding rectangle? Let's compute: In input, B region maybe 8 rows tall? Not sure. Example2: Input colors: Y, R. R forms a big block (board). Y are stray signals scattered. Output i ... [9759 chars truncated]
"The great labyrinth's walls turn to gold wherever a scattered dragon scale has touched the earth, while the lesser maze crumbles to myth."
120b: fail
See: Two labyrinths with walls of the same stone color. Dragon scales of a different color lie scattered across the land, some within the labyrinth passages.
Do: The greater labyrinth transmutes its walls to the dragon-scale color. Scales inside its corridors remain. The lesser labyrinth and all external scales vanish into legend.
Grid: Output is the greater labyrinth — walls now dragon-scale colored, interior cells either empty passage or scale-colored where scales rested.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output smaller 7x7? Let's examine example 1. Input dimensions? Let's count rows: appears 13 rows? Actually list: lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . . G . ." etc. Count rows: 13? Let's count: 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . ; 2) . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ; 3) . . . G . . . . B B B B B B B . ; 4) . . . . . . . . B . . G . . B . ; 5) . G . . . G . . B . . . . . B . ; 6) . . . . . . G . B G . G . . B . ; 7) . . . . . . . . B . . . . . B . ; 8) . B B B B B B . B B B B B B B . ; 9) . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . ; 10) . B . . . G B . . . . . . . . . ; 11) . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . ; 12) G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . . ; 13) G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . . . Wait row 13 maybe longer. Output is 6 rows? Actually output shown 6 rows of 7 columns. Output: G G G G G G G G . . G . . G G . . . . . G G G . G . . G G . . . . . G G G G G G G G That's a 6x7? Count rows: 6 rows, each 7 columns. So transformation extracts the "greater labyrinth" (larger shape) and recolors its walls to dragon-scale color (which is G in example? Let's see: In input, there are B walls? The labyrinth walls are B (blue). Dragon scales are G (green). The description: walls same stone color, scales different color. Greater labyrinth transmutes its walls to dragon-scale color. So output walls become G, interior cells either empty or G where scales were. Thus we need to find the larger of two labyrinths (connected region of walls) composed of B cells. There are two labyrinths of B walls. The larger one is selected. Its walls become G. Inside that labyrinth, any G cells that were originally inside become G (remain). All other cells become empty? Output shows only G and . (empty). Indeed output only G and . . So we need to produce a cropped grid that contains only the selected labyrinth region (maybe trimmed to bounding box). The output grid dimensions correspond to bounding box of larger labyrinth? Let's test. In input, B walls form shapes. Let's locate larger labyrinth. Hard to visualize but output shape is like a rectangular ring with some interior walls? Let's map output pattern: 6 rows x7 columns. Rows: 1: G G G G G G G (top wall full) 2: G . . G . . G 3: G . . . . . G 4: G G . G . . G 5: G . . . . . G 6: G G G G G G G (bottom wall full) This looks like a maze shape with interior walls at certain positions. Now compare to input: The larger labyrinth likely corresponds to B walls forming that shape, with some G cells inside (scales). Indeed there are G cells inside that shape in input. Thus rule: Identify all connected components of B (walls). Determine which component has larger area (count of B cells). That is the greater labyrinth. Then produce output: a cropped grid that includes the bounding rectangle of that component (maybe minimal rectangle that contains all its cells). Within that rectangle, replace all B cells with the color of the scales (which is the other color present inside the component? In ex ... [8268 chars truncated]
"The principal dancer's costume is re-sequined in the color of confetti raining down on the stage, while the understudy exits into the wings."
120b: k=1
See: Two dancer silhouettes outlined in matching costume color. Confetti of a contrasting color drifts everywhere — on stage, on both dancers, in the audience.
Do: The principal's costume outline is re-sequined in confetti color. Confetti that landed on the principal stays. The understudy and all confetti beyond the principal's frame disappear.
Grid: Output is the principal's silhouette — outline in confetti color, interior cells either bare or confetti-colored as they fell.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output is 6x7? Actually output shown 6 rows, 7 columns. Input seems larger with many colors. The description: two dancer silhouettes outlined in matching costume color. Confetti of contrasting color drifts everywhere — on stage, on both dancers, in audience. Output is principal's silhouette — outline in confetti color, interior cells either bare or confetti-colored as they fell. So we need to find principal silhouette (one of two outlines) and replace its outline color with confetti color, keep confetti that landed on principal (i.e., cells inside principal that are confetti color) remain, other confetti outside principal disappear. Understudy silhouette disappears. Thus we need to identify two shapes (silhouettes) of same outline color. In example, likely color G (green) outlines? Input contains many G and B etc. Let's examine example input snippet: many G and B. Output is only G and . (black). Output shows outline in G (confetti color) and interior maybe . (bare) or G where confetti landed? In output, there are G interior cells at some positions: row2 col2? Actually output grid: Row1: G G G G G G G Row2: G . . G . . G Row3: G . . . . . G Row4: G G . G . . G Row5: G . . . . . G Row6: G G G G G G G So shape is like a figure maybe? Outline G forms border, interior some G at (2,4) and (4,2?) Actually row2 col4 is G, row4 col2 is G, row4 col4 is G. Those are interior confetti that landed. Thus principal silhouette outline originally maybe B? Wait input includes many B (blue) forming a shape? Let's look at input: there is a big block of B forming something like a rectangle with some holes. Also G scattered. The output outline is G, not B. So confetti color is G (contrasting). Principal's costume outline is re-sequined in confetti color. So original principal outline color is something else (maybe B). Understudy outline also same color as principal (matching costume). So both silhouettes have same outline color (maybe B). Confetti color is G. In output, we see outline in G (confetti color). So we need to find the principal silhouette among the two B outlines, and output its shape with outline colored G, interior cells that were G in input remain G, others become . (black). Also remove other silhouette and all other colors. Thus we need to detect two shapes of same outline color (B). Determine which is principal (maybe larger? or positioned? maybe the one that contains more confetti inside?). In example, there are two B shapes? Let's examine input: there is a big B shape central, plus maybe another B shape elsewhere? Looking at input rows: many B forming a big rectangle from rows 3-9 columns maybe 8-? Also there are B in other places like row2 column? Actually row2 has . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . (no B). Row3: . . . G . . . . B B B B B B B . So B block starts row3 col9? Row4: . . . . . . . . B . . G . . B . So B single at col9 and col15. Row5: . G . . . G . . B . . . . . B . So ... [9641 chars truncated]
"The larger crystal geode's outer shell mineralizes to match the trace element flecks embedded in the surrounding rock, while the smaller geode erodes away."
120b: fail
See: Two geode cross-sections with shells of the same mineral color. Trace element flecks of a different color are distributed through the rock matrix and inside both geodes.
Do: The larger geode's shell crystallizes into the trace element color. Flecks inside its cavity remain. The smaller geode and all external flecks are weathered away.
Grid: Output is the larger geode — shell in trace-element color, interior cells either void (black) or flecked where trace elements were found.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large with many colors. Output is a smaller grid (7x6?) Actually output shown 6 rows, 7 columns. Input seems larger (maybe 14x14). The description: two geodes with shells same mineral color, trace element flecks different color. Larger geode's shell crystallizes into trace element color. Flecks inside its cavity remain. Smaller geode and external flecks are removed. Thus we need to detect two "geodes": likely shapes of a particular color (shell). In example, which colors? Input includes G (green) and B (blue) etc. Let's examine example 1 input snippet: many B's forming large shape, also G's scattered. Output is all G's forming a border shape with interior . and some G inside? Output grid: 7x6? Actually lines: G G G G G G G G . . G . . G G . . . . . G G G . G . . G G . . . . . G G G G G G G G That's 7 columns, 6 rows. Looks like a shape of a geode: outer shell G, interior some G at certain positions (maybe flecks). The interior . are black (void). The pattern maybe corresponds to larger geode in input: a shape of B? Let's see input: there is a big block of B's forming a rectangular shape with some interior B's and G flecks. Also there are G's outside. Probably the larger geode is the B region (blue) with shell of B? But output uses G as shell (trace element color). In description: larger geode's shell crystallizes into trace element color. So shell color becomes trace element color (which is different). In input, trace element flecks are a different color distributed through rock matrix and inside both geodes. So we need to identify the trace element color (the flecks). In example, trace element color likely G (green). Because output shell is G. Indeed input has many G scattered, maybe flecks. The larger geode's shell originally maybe B (blue). In output, shell becomes G. Inside cavity, flecks remain (i.e., original G positions inside the geode). In output we see some G inside interior (positions where there were G flecks inside the larger geode). Let's verify: In output, interior G positions: row2 col4? Actually row2: G . . G . . G => positions 1,4,7 are G. Row3: G . . . . . G => only edges. Row4: G G . G . . G => positions 1,2,4,7. Row5: G . . . . . G => edges. So interior G's at (2,4), (4,2), (4,4). These correspond to where G flecks were inside the B region. Thus rule: Identify the larger contiguous region of a particular "shell" color (maybe the most abundant non-fleck color). The shell is a contiguous region of a single color that encloses an interior (hole). The interior may contain flecks of another color (trace). The output is a cropped minimal bounding box of that larger geode, with shell recolored to trace element color, interior cells set to black except where original flecks existed (keep trace color). Remove everything else. Now test input: we have colors: A (azure), B (blue), maybe others. Need to find two geodes: likely one larger region of B (blue) forming a shell, a ... [9251 chars truncated]
"The larger mold soaks up the sauce splattered across the counter, while the smaller mold is tossed in the sink."
120b: k=2
See: Two cookie-cutter outlines of the same color sit on a messy countertop. Droplets of a sauce in a contrasting color are splashed everywhere — on the counter, inside the molds, even on their rims.
Do: Lift the larger mold and dip it entirely in the sauce so its walls change color. Any sauce drops already inside stay put. Throw away the smaller mold and wipe the counter clean.
Grid: The output is the larger mold, now fully glazed in the sauce color. Interior cells are either clean or sauce-spotted, matching what was inside originally.
We need to infer rule. From description: two cookie-cutter outlines of same color, larger and smaller. Sauce of contrasting color. Output is larger mold fully glazed in sauce color, interior cells either clean or sauce-spotted matching original interior. Thus input contains two shapes (outlines) of same color (maybe border). Larger shape contains interior with possibly some other color (sauce) spots. Smaller shape is to be discarded. Output is the larger shape's outline changed to sauce color, interior preserved (original interior colors? but description says interior cells are either clean or sauce-spotted, matching what was inside originally). In examples, we can deduce. Example1: Input grid includes many colors: G, B, etc. Output is 7x7 grid of G and . (black). Let's examine: Output shape is a border of G (the sauce color?) Actually output shows G border and interior . except some interior G? Let's see output lines: Row1: G G G G G G G Row2: G . . G . . G Row3: G . . . . . G Row4: G G . G . . G Row5: G . . . . . G Row6: G G G G G G G So shape is a 6x7? Actually 6 rows, 7 columns. The border is G except some missing? Row2 col4 is G (makes interior shape). Row4 col2 is G, col4 G. So interior contains some G spots that correspond to original sauce inside larger mold. Thus larger mold outline originally maybe B? Let's examine input example1: many B's forming a shape. Also G's scattered. The larger mold likely B outline, smaller mold maybe something else? Let's locate B region: In input, there is a big rectangle of B's forming a shape. Also there are G's inside that rectangle. The output is the B outline turned into G (sauce color). Indeed output border is G. So sauce color is G. The interior retains original G spots (some inside). In output interior we see G at positions (2,4) and (4,2) and (4,4). Those correspond to original G inside B shape. Thus rule: Identify the larger of two shapes that share same outline color? Actually both molds same color. In example1, there are two B outlines? Let's see smaller mold maybe also B but smaller. Input also has a small B shape elsewhere? At top left maybe? There is a small B cluster? At rows 1-4 there are B's forming something? Hard to parse. But rule: Find the color that appears as a closed outline (i.e., border of shape) that encloses other cells. There are two such outlines of same color; choose the larger one. Then output a grid that is just that shape (cropped to bounding box) with its outline recolored to the interior color (the contrasting sauce) which is the other color present inside (maybe the most frequent interior color). The interior cells become either '.' (black) if they were empty originally, or retain the interior color if there was sauce droplet. In example2: Input includes Y (yellow) as sauce? Let's see output: border Y, interior . except some Y interior spots. Output shape is 7x7 with Y border. Input likely had a large rectangle of Y? Actually input shows Y scattered and R shape? ... [9148 chars truncated]
"The grand piano absorbs the timbre of the scattered grace notes, drowning out the ukulele entirely."
120b: k=1
See: Two rectangular instruments drawn in the same tone sit among scattered accent notes of a different pitch. One instrument is large, one is small.
Do: The larger instrument re-voices itself in the pitch of the scattered accents. The smaller instrument goes silent. Notes that were already resonating inside the larger frame keep ringing.
Grid: Output is the larger instrument's frame, every border pixel re-pitched to the accent color. Interior pixels are silent (black) or sustaining the accent tone where notes existed.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid has many colors; output is a smaller grid? In example output is 6x7? Actually output lines: 6 rows, each 7 columns. Input seems larger (maybe 13x15?). The description: two rectangular instruments drawn in same tone among scattered accent notes of different pitch. Larger instrument re-voices itself in pitch of scattered accents. Smaller instrument goes silent. Notes already resonating inside larger frame keep ringing. Interpretation: There are two rectangles (frames) of same color (instrument) in input. One larger rectangle, one smaller rectangle. The scattered accent notes are other colors (different pitch). The rule: output is the larger rectangle's frame, with border pixels recolored to accent color (maybe the most common accent color?). Interior pixels become black (.) except where there were accent notes inside the larger rectangle—they stay as accent color. In example: Let's analyze input colors. Need to identify rectangle colors. Look at input example 1: many B (blue) forming large rectangle? Let's view roughly: rows 1-14? The B region seems like a big rectangle from row3 col? Let's map coordinates quickly? Hard. But output uses G as border color. In input, G appears scattered as accent notes. The larger rectangle's original color maybe B? Actually B is the instrument color (same tone). The accent notes are G. Output border is G (accent color). Interior is '.' except where there were G inside original rectangle (they stay G). Let's verify: Output interior positions have '.' except some G inside? Output grid shows pattern: first row all G. Second row: G . . G . . G. So interior has some G at positions where original had G inside rectangle? Possibly. Thus rule: Identify the largest rectangle composed of a single color (instrument). Replace its border with the most common other color (accent) present in the whole grid (or maybe the color that appears outside rectangle). Fill interior with '.' except keep any accent-colored cells that were originally inside rectangle (they remain accent color). Also smaller rectangle of same color is ignored (goes silent). Output is just the rectangle (cropped to its bounding box) with modifications. Now test input: need to find two rectangles of same color. Likely B again? Let's examine test input lines (I'll index rows). Provide grid 18 rows? Let's count rows: lines given from ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . ." that's row1. Row2 ". . . . B B B B B B B B . . . . ." row2. Row3 "B B B . B . A . A . . B A . . . ." row3. Row4 "B . B . B . . . . . . B A . A . ." row4. Row5 "B B B . B . . . . . . B . . A . ." row5. Row6 ". . . . B . . . . . . B . . . . ." row6. Row7 ". . . . B . A . . . . B . . . . A" row7. Row8 ". . . . B . . . . A . B . . . . ." row8. Row9 ". . . . B B B B B B B B . A . . ." row9. Row10 ". A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." row10. Row11 ". . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . ." row11. Row12 ". A . . . . . . . . B B B B B B ." row12. Row13 ". . . ... [7222 chars truncated]
"The championship arena's lines are repainted in the visiting team's color after fans storm the field."
120b: k=1
See: Two playing fields outlined in the home team's color occupy a larger space. Fan confetti of the visiting team's color is scattered everywhere — in the stands, on both fields.
Do: The larger arena absorbs the visiting color into its boundary lines. Confetti that landed inside its lines stays. The smaller practice court is abandoned.
Grid: The output shows the larger arena with all boundary lines in the visiting color. Interior positions are either bare ground or visiting-color confetti.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid larger with many colors; output is a smaller grid? In example, output is 6x7? Actually output lines: 6 rows, each 7 columns. Input appears larger (maybe 13x16). The description: two playing fields outlined in home team's color occupy a larger space. Fan confetti of visiting team's color scattered everywhere — in the stands, on both fields. Larger arena absorbs visiting color into its boundary lines. Confetti that landed inside its lines stays. Smaller practice court is abandoned. Interpretation: There are two rectangular regions (fields) outlined in a certain color (home team). The larger rectangle is the "arena". The smaller rectangle is "practice court". The visiting team's color appears as scattered cells (confetti). The transformation: output shows only the larger rectangle, with its boundary lines colored in visiting team's color, interior cells either empty (black) or visiting color confetti that were originally inside the rectangle. The smaller rectangle is removed. Thus we need to detect two rectangles outlined by a particular color (home team). Determine which is larger. Then produce a grid that is exactly the size of that rectangle (including its border). Fill border cells with the visiting color (the other color that appears as scattered). Inside cells: keep original visiting color where present, else black (.)? In example output, border is G (green) while interior has G only where there were G originally? Let's examine example. Input example: colors present: G (green) and B (blue). Likely home team color is B? Actually rectangle outlines maybe B? Let's see input: there are many B forming big shape. Also there are G scattered. Output border is G, interior includes G where originally G inside rectangle. So home team color = B (blue) outlines rectangle(s). Visiting team color = G (green) confetti. In output, border is G (visiting color) not B. So rule: replace boundary lines of larger rectangle (originally B) with visiting color G. Inside keep G where originally present, else . (black). Indeed output interior cells are '.' except where G existed originally inside rectangle. Check output: Row1: G G G G G G G (top border all G). Row2: G . . G . . G . Let's map interior: original rectangle interior had some G at positions? Input row2 (0-index?) Let's locate rectangle coordinates. Need to verify. But seems plausible. Thus for test input: we need to identify two rectangles outlined in a home color. Which colors present? Input includes B (blue), A (azure), maybe others. Let's list colors: B, A. Possibly also others? I see only B and A. So home color likely B (blue) outlines rectangles, visiting color A (azure) confetti. We need to find two rectangular perimeters made of B. Let's examine test input grid coordinates. Let's index rows. I'll copy grid with row numbers. Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A . ." Row1: ". . . . B B B B B B B B . . . . ." Row2: "B B B . B . A . A . . B A ... [8183 chars truncated]
"The larger storm cell's eye wall takes on the hue of lightning flashing across the sky, while the smaller disturbance dissipates."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two closed pressure systems share the same isobar color. Lightning strikes of a different color are scattered across the entire weather map, some falling inside the systems.
Do: The dominant storm absorbs the lightning color into its pressure walls. Interior strikes persist. The weaker system fades from the map.
Grid: Output is the dominant storm's bounding box. Its walls are now lightning-colored. Interior cells are calm (black) or electrified where strikes landed.
"The cathedral's stone walls are stained by the pigment of wildflowers growing through the ruins, while the garden shed crumbles to nothing."
120b: fail
See: Two hollow structures share the same wall material. Wildflower specks of a contrasting color dot the landscape, including inside both buildings.
Do: The cathedral's walls are recolored to match the wildflowers. Flowers inside its nave remain. The shed vanishes along with everything outside.
Grid: The output is the cathedral footprint — walls in wildflower color, interior cells either bare floor or flower-colored where blossoms grew.
We need to infer rule from example. Input grid large, output is smaller 7x7? Let's examine example1. Input dimensions? Let's count rows: appears 13 rows? Actually list: lines from ". . . . . . . . . . . . . G . ." etc. Count rows: 13? Let's count: 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . ; 2) . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . ; 3) . . . G . . . . B B B B B B B . ; 4) . . . . . . . . B . . G . . B . ; 5) . G . . . G . . B . . . . . B . ; 6) . . . . . . G . B G . G . . B . ; 7) . . . . . . . . B . . . . . B . ; 8) . B B B B B B . B B B B B B B . ; 9) . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . ; 10) . B . . . G B . . . . . . . . . ; 11) . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . ; 12) G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . . ; 13) G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . . . Wait row13 maybe longer. Output is 6 rows? Actually output shown 6 rows of 7 columns. Output: G G G G G G G G . . G . . G G . . . . . G G G . G . . G G . . . . . G G G G G G G G That's a 6x7? Count rows: 6 rows, each 7 columns. So transformation extracts a "cathedral" shape: two hollow structures share same wall material. In input, there are two rectangular hollow shapes made of B (blue) maybe? Let's examine input: there is a big rectangle of B forming a building? Row8: . B B B B B B . B B B B B B B . That's a row of B with a dot at start and after 7 B's a dot then 7 B's etc. Looks like two adjacent rectangular structures sharing a wall? Actually row8 has B's from col2-8, then dot col9, then B's col10-16. So two rectangles separated by a dot column (wall maybe?). The "wall material" maybe B (blue). The "wildflower specks of a contrasting color" are G (green) scattered inside and outside. Goal: recolor cathedral walls to match wildflowers (i.e., change B to G). Flowers inside its nave remain (i.e., keep G inside). The shed vanishes along with everything outside (i.e., remove the second structure and everything outside the main cathedral). Output shows only one rectangle (cathedral) with walls colored G, interior cells either '.' (black) or G where flowers were. Thus we need to identify the larger left rectangle? Let's see output shape: 6 rows high, 7 columns wide. That matches left rectangle dimensions? In input, left rectangle appears rows 3-12? Let's locate left rectangle: Starting at row3 col4? Row3: ". . . G . . . . B B B B B B B ." So B's start at col9? Actually count columns: Let's index columns 1-16. Row3: col1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 'G';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 'B';10 'B';11 'B';12 'B';13 'B';14 'B';15 'B';16 '.' So left rectangle maybe columns 9-15? That's width 7. Row8 also has B's columns 2-8 (left rectangle) and 10-16 (right). Wait mismatch. Maybe the cathedral is the right rectangle? Let's examine rows 3-12 columns 9-15: Row3 B's all across. Row4: ". . . . . . . . B . . G . . B ." => B at col9, also B at col15? Actually there is B at col9 and B at col15. Row5: ". G . . . G . . B . . . . . B ." => B at col9 and col15. Row6: ". . . . . . G . B G . G . . B ." => B at col9 and col15. Row7: ". . . . . . . . B ... [9119 chars truncated]
"The fortress raises captured enemy flags along every parapet, while the outpost is razed and forgotten."
120b: fig alone solves
See: Two fortifications share the same wall color. Enemy flags of a different color are planted across the battlefield, some within the fortress walls.
Do: Strip the fortress walls of their original color and replace with the enemy flag color. Flags planted inside remain. The smaller outpost and all battlefield flags outside are removed.
Grid: Output is the fortress — every wall segment now flies the enemy color. Interior cells are either empty or enemy-flagged as they were.
"The main stage's curtains are dyed to match the roses thrown by the audience, while the rehearsal room goes dark."
120b: k=3
See: Two stages framed in the same curtain color. Rose petals of a different color are strewn across the entire theater — aisles, stages, balconies.
Do: The main stage's curtain fabric takes on the rose color. Petals that landed on the main stage stay. The rehearsal room and all petals outside are struck from the set.
Grid: Output is the main stage rectangle — frame in rose color, interior cells either dark or rose-colored matching petal positions.
We need to infer rule from examples. Let's analyze. We have input grids with many colors, output is a rectangle (smaller) with frame of a certain color (rose color) and interior cells either dark (.) or rose-colored matching petal positions. Metaphor: Two stages framed in same curtain color. Rose petals of a different color are strewn across entire theater — aisles, stages, balconies. What to do: The main stage's curtain fabric takes on the rose color. Petals that landed on the main stage stay. The rehearsal room and all petals outside are struck from the set. Output is the main stage rectangle — frame in rose color, interior cells either dark or rose-colored matching petal positions. Interpretation: Input contains a rectangular region (main stage) defined by a border of a certain color (curtain). Inside that rectangle there are some cells of another color (rose petals). The output should be that rectangle, with border changed to the rose color (i.e., the border color becomes the petal color), and interior cells: keep the rose-colored cells (petals) as that color, others become black (.)? In examples, output uses only two colors: the border color (which is the petal color) and '.' for empty interior cells, but also sometimes interior includes the border color where petals were originally? Let's examine. Example1: Input colors: many B (blue), G (green). Output uses G as border and interior G where there were G in original? Let's see. Input example1: I need to locate rectangle. Look at grid: appears there is a rectangle of B's forming a big block? Actually output is 6x7 rectangle (rows 6, cols 7). Output border all G. Inside pattern: some '.' and some G. Let's map input: The region maybe defined by G? In input, there are many G scattered. The rectangle maybe defined by G border? Let's check coordinates: In input, there is a region of B's forming a big rectangle from row 2? Let's examine quickly. But output border is G, not B. So the "curtain color" maybe B (blue) originally, and rose petals are G (green). The rule: The main stage rectangle is defined by the outermost rectangle formed by the most frequent color? Let's analyze. In example1, the output rectangle size 6x7. Where does that come from? Let's locate in input: maybe there is a rectangle of B's with interior containing G's? Let's see rows with B pattern: Row 7 (0-index?) Actually list: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . G . . Row1: . . . . G . . . . . . . . . . . Row2: . . . G . . . . B B B B B B B . Row3: . . . . . . . . B . . G . . B . Row4: . G . . . G . . B . . . . . B . Row5: . . . . . . G . B G . G . . B . Row6: . . . . . . . . B . . . . . B . Row7: . B B B B B B . B B B B B B B . Row8: . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . Row9: . B . . . G B . . . . . . . . . Row10: . B . . . . B . . . . . . . . . Row11: G B B B B B B . . . . G . . . . Row12: G . . . . . . G . . G G . . . . We need to find a rectangle whose border is maybe B? Let's see rectangle of B's: rows 7-11 maybe? ... [9836 chars truncated]
"The larger raised bed's wooden border weathers to the same shade as the wildflower seeds scattered by the wind."
120b: fail
See: Two garden beds with matching wooden borders. Seeds of a contrasting color have blown across the entire garden, landing inside and outside both beds.
Do: The larger bed's border weathers to the seed color. Seeds already inside it remain rooted. The smaller bed and all seeds beyond the borders are cleared away.
Grid: Output is the larger bed — border now seed-colored, interior cells either bare soil or sprouted seeds in their original positions.
We need to infer rule from examples. We have metaphor: two garden beds with matching wooden borders. Larger bed's border becomes seed color; seeds inside remain; smaller bed and all seeds beyond borders cleared away. Output is larger bed border now seed-colored, interior cells either bare soil or sprouted seeds in original positions. Interpretation: Input grid contains two rectangular frames (borders) of some color? The "seed color" is a contrasting color that has "blown across entire garden, landing inside and outside both beds". So there is a color that appears scattered across grid, both inside and outside the two rectangular frames. The larger frame's border changes to that seed color; interior retains original seed positions (i.e., the scattered color cells inside the larger frame remain as they were). The smaller frame and all seeds beyond borders are cleared (set to background? maybe '.' black). Output is just the larger frame region (cropped to that rectangle) with border colored seed color, interior cells either '.' or seed color where they were originally. Thus we need to detect two rectangular shapes (borders) of same color (maybe a particular color like G, Y, R). In examples, let's examine. Example1 Input: many colors: G, B, etc. Output is 6x7 grid (looks like rectangle). Output border is G (seed color?) Actually output border is G. In input, there are two rectangular borders of G? Let's see input lines: I will map coordinates. But easier: In output, border cells are G, interior some '.' and some G? Actually interior includes '.' and maybe G? Let's see output example1: Row1: G G G G G G G (top border) Row2: G . . G . . G Row3: G . . . . . G Row4: G G . G . . G Row5: G . . . . . G Row6: G G G G G G G (bottom border) So border all G. Inside there are some G at positions (2,4) and (4,2) and (4,4?) Wait row4 col2 is G (since row4: G G . G . . G). So interior G's correspond to original seed positions? Let's check input: there are many B's forming a big rectangle maybe? Actually B appears as large block. G appears scattered. Maybe the larger bed is the rectangle formed by B? But output border is G, not B. So seed color is G (contrasting color). The larger bed's border becomes seed color (G). So original border color maybe B? Let's examine input: there is a big rectangle of B's forming a border? Look at rows 7-9 maybe. Input lines show B B B B B B B . B B B B B B B . That's row8 (0-index?). That looks like a rectangle of B with interior maybe '.' and some G inside. So larger rectangle border is B. Seed color is G (scattered). Output border becomes G (seed color). Inside we keep G where they were originally inside the rectangle. Indeed interior G's appear at positions where G existed inside B rectangle. Thus rule: Identify the largest rectangular shape formed by a uniform color (the "bed border"). Replace its border with the other color that appears elsewhere (the "seed color") which is the most frequent other color? Actually seed co ... [9647 chars truncated]
See: The input is a single row of 5 cells. Some cells are black (background) and some are non-black (colored). The non-black cells form a pattern embedded within the row, with black cells acting as spacers between or around them.
Do: 1. Count the number of non-black cells in the input row. Call this number N. 2. Create a square output grid of size (5×N) by (5×N), filled entirely with black cells. 3. Place the input row as the bottom row of the output grid, left-aligned (occupying the first 5 columns, with the remaining columns filled with black). 4. For each row above the bottom, shift the entire 5-cell input pattern one column to the right compared to the row below it. Cells that shift beyond the right edge of the output grid are discarded. Cells vacated on the left become black. 5. Continue this diagonal shifting upward until the top row, where the pattern has been shifted right by (5×N − 1) positions. Only the non-black cells that still fall within the grid bounds are drawn; all other cells remain black.
Grid: The output grid is always square. Its side length equals 5 times the number of non-black cells in the input row (e.g., 2 non-black cells → 10×10, 4 non-black cells → 20×20). The background color is black. The input's 5-cell pattern traces a diagonal stripe from the bottom-left area to the top-right corner, with each row offset one column to the right from the row below.
"A shooting star streaks across the night sky, its colored fragments trailing behind it."
120b: k=4
See: A handful of colored sparks sit loaded in a launch rail at the bottom of a dark night sky. The black cells are empty sky; the colored cells are the glowing fragments of a firework about to be launched diagonally upward.
Do: Light the fuse. The colored sparks launch from the bottom-left and streak toward the upper-right corner, leaving a diagonal trail across the darkness. Each moment the cluster of sparks drifts one step higher and one step to the right, painting a luminous streak across the sky. The brighter the firework — the more colored sparks it carries — the bigger the sky it needs to cross.
Grid: The night sky is a square canvas whose size grows with the brilliance of the firework — more sparks demand a grander stage. The streak runs from the bottom-left corner to the upper-right, a single glowing diagonal ribbon of color against a field of pure darkness.
We need to infer rule. From examples, input is a single row? In examples, input appears as a row of 5 cells. Output is a square grid of size (input length *? maybe 5x5? Actually output size seems larger: Example1 input length 5, output is 15x15? Let's count rows: they show 15 rows, each row 15 columns. So output size = (input length *3)? 5*3=15. Example2 input length 5, output 5x5? Wait example2 output shows 5 rows, each 5 columns. Actually they show 5 rows. So size = input length? Example2 output is 5x5. Example3 input length 5, output 15x15 again. Example4 input length5, output 5x5. So pattern: sometimes output size 5, sometimes 15. What determines? Possibly number of non-black (colored) cells in input. Example1 input: ". W . A Y" has three colored cells (W, A, Y). Output size 15. Example2 input: ". . R . ." has one colored cell (R). Output size 5. Example3 input: "Y . M . A" has three colored cells (Y, M, A). Output size 15. Example4 input: ". Y . . ." has one colored cell (Y). Output size 5. Thus size = 5 * number of colored cells? For 3 colored -> 15. For 1 colored ->5. So output dimension = 5 * count(colored). Good. Now transformation: It seems to create diagonal from bottom-left to top-right, placing the colored sequence along that diagonal, repeated? Let's examine example2: Input sequence left to right: . . R . . . Only R at position 3 (0-index 2). Output 5x5 grid: Row0: . . . . . Row1: . . . . . Row2: . . . . R Row3: . . . R . Row4: . . R . . So diagonal from bottom-left (row4 col0) upward right? Actually bottom-left is row4 col0 (since rows top to bottom). The diagonal of R's appears as a line of length 3? Wait there are three R's placed? Let's list coordinates with R: (row2,col4), (row3,col3), (row4,col2). That's a diagonal of length 3, sloping down-left to up-right? Actually as row increases (downwards), column decreases. That's a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left. But description says from bottom-left to upper-right. However orientation may be reversed due to coordinate system. Let's see example1: Input colored sequence: W A Y (positions 2,4,5?). Actually input row: ". W . A Y" positions: col0 ., col1 W, col2 ., col3 A, col4 Y. Output 15x15 shows many rows. Let's examine first few rows: Row0: all . (15). Row1: ... W at column? Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" So W at far right column 14. Row2: W at column13. Row3: W at col12, A at col13? Actually row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" So W at col11? Wait need to count. Let's think pattern: It seems they are drawing the colored sequence along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left? Let's examine bottom rows: last row (row14): ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." So bottom row has W at col1, A at col3, Y at col4. That's same as input positions but shifted left? Actually bottom row corresponds to original input row placed at bottom-left? Let's see bottom row: columns: 0 .,1 W,2 .,3 A,4 Y, rest . . So bottom row replicates input row at left side. Then each row above shi ... [6868 chars truncated]
"A strand of DNA unzips and migrates across an electrophoresis gel, its colored nucleotides drifting at an angle through the dark medium, each band offset slightly from the last."
120b: k=2
See: A short genetic sequence resting in a single row — some bases are active (colored), others silent (black).
Do: The sequence migrates diagonally through a dark gel matrix, replicating itself on every new row but shifted one position further in its journey. The gel expands to accommodate the full migration path.
Grid: The dark gel is black. The colored bases trace a diagonal ribbon from one corner to the other, with the original sequence repeated at each step of the migration.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1: Input is a single row of length 5: ". W . A Y". Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see output lines count: appears 15 rows, each row length 15. The pattern: diagonal replication of the original sequence (excluding leading black?) Let's examine. Input sequence: positions 0 '.' (black),1 'W',2 '.',3 'A',4 'Y'. We need to produce a diagonal ribbon from top-left to bottom-right, where each step down shifts the sequence right by one? Let's view output row 0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". all black. Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column). Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at column13, then '.'? Actually row2 shows "... W .". So W at column13, dot at column14. Row3: "... W . A" etc. Let's index columns 0-14. Row1 (index1) has W at col14. Row2 (index2) has W at col13, A at col14? Wait row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." So W at col13, '.' at col14. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" => W at col12, '.' at col13, A at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" => W at col11, '.' at col12, A at col13, Y at col14. Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." => W at col10, '.' at col11, A at col12, Y at col13, '.' at col14. Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." => W col9, '.' col10, A col11, Y col12, '.' col13, '.' col14. Continue shifting left each row, adding more of the sequence? Actually pattern seems to be moving the original row (with its colors) diagonally down-left across the grid, replicating each step. Essentially we take the input row of length N (5). Output grid size is (2N-1) maybe? Here N=5, output size 15? That's 3N? Wait 2N-1 =9. Not 15. Maybe output size = (N*3)? 5*3=15. Indeed output is 15x15. Example2: Input length 5, output size? Let's count rows: output shows 5 rows? Actually example2 output: 5 rows each length 5. So size = N? Not consistent. Let's examine example2: Input ". . R . .". Output grid 5x5 with diagonal of R moving from bottom-left to top-right? Output rows: Row0: ". . . . ." Row1: ". . . . ." Row2: ". . . . R" Row3: ". . . R ." Row4: ". . R . ." So pattern: original row has R at position2 (0-index). Output shows R moving diagonally down-left? Starting at row2 col4 (bottom right?), then row3 col3, row4 col2. That's a diagonal of length 3 (including original?). The original row length 5, but only three rows have R. The output grid size is 5x5 same as input. So rule may be: take the colored cells (non-black) from input row, and create a diagonal line of those colors moving down-left across rows, replicating the pattern each step, until they reach bottom-left corner? In example2, there is only one colored cell (R). It appears at original column 2. In output, we see R at (row2,col4), (row3,col3), (row4,col2). That's moving down-left each row, shifting left by 1 column each step, starting from row where? Row index equals original column? Let's compute: original column of R =2. In output, the first occurrence of R is at row2 (s ... [8540 chars truncated]
"Light from a distant quasar is gravitationally lensed, its spectral signature smeared diagonally across the dark detector array, the same emission pattern repeating at each pixel offset."
120b: k=1
See: A single row of spectral readings — some colored emission lines, some dark gaps.
Do: Gravitational lensing smears the spectrum diagonally across an expanding detector, replicating the emission pattern at each successive row with a one-pixel offset.
Grid: The detector background is black. The colored emission lines form a diagonal smear of the same spectral fingerprint repeated across the full array.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is a single row of 5 cells: ". W . A Y". Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's count rows: output shown 15 rows, each row 15 columns. Input length 5, output size 15 = 3*5? Actually 5*3 =15. So rule expands each element into a diagonal smear across whole grid, replicating pattern shifted each row. Observing output: The pattern seems to be the original row placed diagonally from top-right to bottom-left? Let's map coordinates. Output rows indexed 0..14, columns 0..14. Row0: all '.' (black). Row1: only column13 has W (since row1 shows many '.' then W at second last? Actually row1 line: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W". That's column14? Wait there are 15 entries; last is W. So row1 col14 = W. Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." => W at col13. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" => W at col12, A at col14? Actually there are 15 entries; positions: col0..14. Row3 shows W at col11? Let's count: there are 12 '.' then W then '.' then A? Let's count precisely: Row3 string: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". That's 12 '.' then W then '.' then A = total 15. So W at col12, A at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" => 11 '.' then W at col10, '.'? Wait after W there is '.' then A then Y? Actually pattern: 11 '.' then W then '.' then A then Y = columns 0-10 '.'; col11 W; col12 '.'; col13 A; col14 Y. Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." => 10 '.' then W at col9, '.' at col10, A col11, Y col12, '.' col13? Wait need count: 10 '.' (0-9?), then W at col10? Let's compute: If 10 '.' indices 0-9, then element at index10 is W, index11 '.' , index12 A, index13 Y, index14 '.' . That matches pattern shifting left each row. Thus pattern: original row ". W . A Y" placed along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left, replicating each element along that diagonal? Actually each row contains a slice of the original row shifted left by one each row, with blanks elsewhere. Specifically, output grid size N = input length * 3? But why 3? Input length 5, output 15. Maybe rule: expand to square of size (input length * 3). The factor maybe equals number of non-black elements? Input has 3 colored cells (W, A, Y). But factor 3? Not sure. Let's examine mapping: For each column offset k from 0 to 14, the row index i where colored cells appear seems to be i = (some) such that the diagonal runs from top-right (row1 col14) down-left. If we overlay original row onto diagonal: original row positions (col indices) 0..4 with colors: [.,W,.,A,Y]. In output, these appear along diagonal: row1 col14 = W (original col1). Row2 col13 = W (col1). Row3 col12 = W, col14 = A (col3). Row4 col11 = W, col13 = A, col14 = Y. Row5 col10 = W, col12 = A, col13 = Y. Row6 col9 = W, col11 = A, col12 = Y, col13 = ?. Actually row6: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." => W at col9, A at col11, Y at col12. So pattern: each row shifts left by one, and the colored sequence appears contiguous? The relative spacing between colors matches original spacing: original ... [10385 chars truncated]
"Colored signal flags strung along a halyard are reflected in the dark water, each wave crest displacing the reflection one position further, until the pennants streak diagonally across the harbor."
120b: fail
See: A single halyard with a few colored flags hung among empty positions.
Do: Each successive wave reflects the flag pattern one position offset, the harbor surface expanding to show the full diagonal streak of reflected pennants.
Grid: The dark water is black. The colored flag reflections form a diagonal streak of the repeating pennant pattern across the harbor.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of 5 cells (maybe variable length). Output is a square grid of size? In examples, input length 5 yields output 15x15? Let's see Example1 input length 5, output appears 15 rows each with 15 columns. Indeed pattern: diagonal of repeating pattern of the input flags (non-black cells) moving down-right each row, with black elsewhere. Essentially we take the input row as a sequence of colored cells (including '.' as black). The output is a square of size (2*len-1)? For len=5, size=15 = 3*5? Wait 5*3 =15. In example2 input length5, output 5x5? Actually example2 output shows 5 rows each with 5 columns. Let's examine: Input . . R . . (R at position 3). Output: row1: . . . . . row2: . . . . . row3: . . . . R row4: . . . R . row5: . . R . . That's a diagonal of single R moving up-left? Actually pattern: R appears on anti-diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Let's map coordinates: rows 1-5 top to bottom, columns 1-5 left to right. R appears at (3,5), (4,4), (5,3). That's a diagonal descending leftwards (southwest) starting at row3 col5. That's like reflecting the input pattern offset each successive wave? Hmm. Example4 input . Y . . . (Y at position2). Output 5x5: row1: . . . . . row2: . . . . Y row3: . . . Y . row4: . . Y . . row5: . Y . . . That's Y moving down-left from (2,5) to (5,2). So similar to example2 but with Y. Example1 and 3 have longer outputs 15x15. Input length5 but output 15x15. Why bigger? Because there are multiple colored flags (non '.'), they create a diagonal streak of repeating pattern across the grid. In example1 input: . W . A Y (positions 2,4,5). Output shows a diagonal of pattern "W A Y" repeating? Let's examine first few rows: Row1 all dots. Row2 has W at column14? Actually row2: ... W at column14? Let's count: row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" that's column15? Wait 15 columns. So W at col15. Row3: W at col14, row4: W at col13, A at col14? Actually row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" So W at col13, A at col15? Wait need to map. Let's write coordinates: Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." So W at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" => W at col13, A at col15. Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" => W col12, A col14, Y col15. So pattern: each row shifts leftwards, adding next flag to the rightmost side, building diagonal of pattern W A Y moving down-left. Thus rule: take input row, treat as sequence of colored cells (including '.' as empty). Create a square grid of size N = (len)*(len?) Actually for example1 len=5, output size 15 = len*3? Because there are 3 non-blank flags? Maybe size = len + (len-1)*(k-1) where k = number of non-blank? Let's compute: non-blank count =3. Output size = len + (len-1)*(k-1) =5 +4*2=13 not 15. Not match. Alternatively maybe output size = len + (len-1) =9? Not. Maybe output size = len * (number of non-blank +1)? For example1: 5*(3+1)=20 not 15. Let's examine example3: input Y . M . A (non-blank count 3). Output size 15 as well. ... [6680 chars truncated]
"A shift register clocks a pattern of colored signals diagonally across a dark LED matrix, each clock cycle advancing the data one position while a new row latches the same bit pattern."
120b: k=2
See: A single register loaded with a few colored bits among dark zeros.
Do: Each clock cycle shifts the register contents one position and latches the pattern onto the next row of the LED matrix, which expands to display the full diagonal sweep of data.
Grid: The unlit matrix is black. The colored signals trace a diagonal sweep of the same bit pattern repeated at each row with one-position offset.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of colors (with '.' as black). Output is a larger grid showing diagonal sweep pattern repeated each row offset. Example1: Input row length? Input: ". W . A Y" that's 5 columns. Output is 15x15? Let's count rows: they show 15 rows, each row length 15. So output size = N*? Input length =5, output size = 5*3? Actually 5*3 =15. So output dimension = input length *3? Example2: Input length 5, output is 5x5. Wait example2 output is 5 rows each 5 columns. So not consistent. Let's examine pattern. Example2 input: ". . R . ." (positions: col3 = R). Output grid 5x5 with diagonal of R moving from bottom-left to top-right? Let's list rows: Row1: . . . . . Row2: . . . . . Row3: . . . . R Row4: . . . R . Row5: . . R . . So pattern: R appears on diagonal from (row5,col3) up to (row3,col5). That's a diagonal of length 3? Actually positions: (5,3), (4,4), (3,5). That's a diagonal moving up-right. Input had R at column3 (index 3). Output shows R repeated on successive rows offset by -1 row and +1 column? Starting row = input length? Let's think: The pattern seems to be that the input row is placed on each row of output, shifted right each time? In example1, input row ". W . A Y". Output rows show pattern: each row contains the sequence "W . A Y" etc shifting left? Let's examine first few rows of example1 output (15x15). Row1: all dots. Row2: ... W at column14? Actually row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column). Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at column13). Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at col12, A at col14). Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" (W col11, A col13, Y col15). So pattern: the input sequence "W . A Y" (ignoring leading dot) is being placed diagonally down-left to up-right? Actually as rows increase, the pattern moves leftwards. Let's map coordinates: Use 1-index columns 1-15. Row2: W at col15. Row3: W at col14. Row4: W at col13, A at col15. Row5: W at col12, A at col14, Y at col15. Row6: W at col11, A at col13, Y at col14, .? Actually row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y .". That's W col10? Wait count: row6 string: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y .". Let's count: positions: 1-10 are dots, 11 is W? Actually there are 10 dots then W at position11, then dot at12, A at13, Y at14, dot at15. So W col11, A col13, Y col14. So pattern: each row adds next element of input moving leftwards, maintaining relative spacing as in original input? Input pattern: columns: 1 '.' ,2 'W',3 '.',4 'A',5 'Y'. So relative offsets: W at offset +1 from start, A at +3, Y at +4 (if start at col1). In output, the diagonal seems to place these at positions shifting left each row. Essentially we are creating a diagonal matrix where each row i (starting from 1) contains the input pattern shifted left by (i-1) positions, and truncated to fit within grid of size N*? The grid size appears to be (input length * something). In example1, output size 15 = 3*5. Why 3? Maybe they repeat pattern three times verti ... [8501 chars truncated]
"A rainbow serpent slithers diagonally across the void, its body a repeating pattern of colored scales separated by darkness, each coil offset by one scale-width as it crosses the expanding cosmos."
120b: k=1
See: A single coil of the serpent's body — a few colored scales among dark gaps.
Do: The serpent stretches diagonally across the void, each body segment repeating the same scale pattern but shifted one position, the cosmos expanding to contain its full passage.
Grid: The void is black. The colored scales form a diagonal serpent body of the repeating pattern crossing from one corner to the other.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is a 1x5 row: ". W . A Y". Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see output lines count: appears 15 rows, each row 15 columns. The pattern: diagonal serpent body repeating pattern shifted one position each row, filling whole grid with pattern along diagonal from top-right? Let's examine output: first row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." all dots? Actually first row shows ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 dots). second row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column). third row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at column 14). fourth row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at col13, A at col15?). Wait need index. Let's map pattern: The original input pattern is ". W . A Y". Dots are black (void). The colored scales are W, A, Y at positions 2,4,5 (1-indexed). The output seems to have a diagonal of these three colors repeating shifted each row down-left? Let's list rows with positions of colors: Row1: none (all .) Row2: col15: W Row3: col14: W Row4: col13: W, col15: A? Actually row4 shows "... W . A". So W at col13, A at col15. Row5: "... W . A Y" => W col12, A col14, Y col15. Row6: "... W . A Y ." => W col11, A col13, Y col14, . at col15? Actually row6 shows "... W . A Y .". So shift left one more. Row7: "... W . A Y . ." etc. It seems each subsequent row shifts the pattern left by one column, adding more of the pattern as it moves down, until row15 has the full pattern starting at col1? Let's check last row: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." Actually last row (row15) shows ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". So pattern appears at columns 2,4,5? Wait row15: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." So W at col2, A at col4, Y at col5. That's the original pattern placed starting at column2? The original input row had . W . A Y (positions 1-5). So pattern is . W . A Y. In output row15, we have . W . A Y at columns 1-5? Actually row15 shows ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". That's columns 1-5 exactly same as input. So the diagonal serpent goes from top-right corner (row2 col15) moving down-left each row, eventually reaching bottom-left? Let's see row2 col15 W, row3 col14 W, row4 col13 W, row5 col12 W, row6 col11 W, row7 col10 W, row8 col9 W, row9 col8 W, row10 col7 W, row11 col6 W, row12 col5 W, row13 col4 W, row14 col3 W, row15 col2 W. So W moves along diagonal from top-right to bottom-left, one step down-left each row. Similarly A appears offset one column to the right of W? Let's track A positions: Row4 col15 A, Row5 col14 A, Row6 col13 A, Row7 col12 A, Row8 col11 A, Row9 col10 A, Row10 col9 A, Row11 col8 A, Row12 col7 A, Row13 col6 A, Row14 col5 A, Row15 col4 A. So A is also moving down-left, but starts later (row4). Y positions: Row5 col15 Y, Row6 col14 Y, Row7 col13 Y, Row8 col12 Y, Row9 col11 Y, Row10 col10 Y, Row11 col9 Y, Row12 col8 Y, Row13 col7 Y, Row14 col6 Y, Row15 col5 Y. Thus the pattern of three colored cells (W, A, Y) repeats along diagonal, preserving relative offsets (W then A two columns later? ... [8557 chars truncated]
"Dancers in colored costumes perform a grand chaîné diagonally across a dark ballroom floor, each line of dancers one step offset from the last, the same formation echoing across the expanding hall."
120b: k=2
See: A single line of dancers — some in colored costumes, some positions vacant.
Do: Each new line enters one step further along the diagonal, repeating the same dancer arrangement, the ballroom expanding to fit the full cascading procession.
Grid: The dark ballroom is black. The colored dancers trace a diagonal cascade of the repeating formation from one corner to the other.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1: Input is a single row of length 5: ". W . A Y". Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see: output appears 15 rows, each row length 15. The pattern: diagonal cascade of the input row repeated? Let's examine. Input row: positions 0 '.' (black),1 'W',2 '.',3 'A',4 'Y'. In output, we see diagonal from top-right? Let's view rows: Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." Row6: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." Row7: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . . ." Row8: ". . . . . . . W . A Y . . . ." Row9: ". . . . . . W . A Y . . . . ." Row10: ". . . . . W . A Y . . . . . ." Row11: ". . . . W . A Y . . . . . . ." Row12: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . ." Row13: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . ." Row14: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." So it's like we take the input row and slide it along a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Actually row14 has ". W . A Y" starting at column1? Row14: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". That's the original row placed starting at column1 (index1). Row13: ". . W . A Y ..." starting at column2? Wait row13: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . .". That's starting at column2 (index2). Row12: start at column3, etc. Row0 has nothing (all .). So we are creating a diagonal of the input row moving up-left direction (i.e., each row moves the pattern one column left). The grid size appears to be (len(input)*3?) Actually input length 5, output size 15. That's 3*5. Why 15? Maybe they create a square of size (len(input)*3). Let's check example2. Example2 Input: ". . R . ." length5. Output is 5x5 grid? Actually output shown: Row0: ". . . . ." Row1: ". . . . ." Row2: ". . . . R" Row3: ". . . R ." Row4: ". . R . ." That's 5 rows, 5 columns. That's not 15. So size equals length? Wait length5 => output 5x5. Example1 length5 => output 15x15. So why bigger? Maybe because there are non-black cells in input (colored). In example1 there are 3 colored cells (W, A, Y) plus blanks. Output size maybe (len(input) + number of colored cells * something). Let's compute: there are 3 colored cells. Output size 15 = 5 + 2*5? Not. Maybe rule: create a diagonal cascade where each step moves the pattern one column left and one row down, until pattern reaches bottom-left corner. The grid size is (len(input) + number of colored cells?) Actually pattern length is 5, and we need enough rows to shift pattern fully left until its last element aligns with leftmost column? In example1, the pattern includes a leading '.' at column0, then W at col1, '.' at col2, A at col3, Y at col4. When shifting left each row, the pattern moves leftwards. The furthest left shift is when the first non-blank (W) reaches column0? In row14, pattern starts at column1 (since first element '.' at col0). Actually row14 has ". W . A Y" starting at col1, meaning the pattern's firs ... [9626 chars truncated]
"Colored mineral veins cut diagonally through dark bedrock, the same crystallization pattern repeating in each successive stratum, offset by tectonic shear one layer at a time."
120b: k=2
See: A single stratum with a few colored mineral deposits among dark rock.
Do: Tectonic shear offsets each successive stratum by one position, repeating the mineral pattern diagonally through the expanding cross-section of bedrock.
Grid: The bedrock is black. The colored minerals form a diagonal vein of the repeating crystallization pattern cutting through the full rock face.
We need to infer rule. From examples. Example1: Input is a single row: ". W . A Y" (5 columns). Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see output lines count: appears 15 rows, each row 15 columns. Pattern: diagonal replication of the input pattern across larger grid, with shear offset each successive stratum by one position, repeating the mineral pattern diagonally through expanding cross-section. Observations: Input pattern: positions: col1 '.' (black), col2 'W' (maroon), col3 '.' , col4 'A' (azure), col5 'Y' (yellow). Output seems to have diagonal lines of the pattern moving down-right? Let's examine first few rows. Row1: all '.' (15). Row2: '.' ... 'W' at column? Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" So W at column15? Actually row2 has W at last column (col15). Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." W at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" W at col13, A at col15? Wait row4 shows "... W . A". So W at col13, A at col15. Row5: "... W . A Y" W at col12, A at col14, Y at col15. Row6: "... W . A Y ." W col11, A col13, Y col14, '.' col15? Actually row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y .". So W col11, A col13, Y col14. Row7: W col10, A col12, Y col13, '.' col14, '.' col15? Row7: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . .". So pattern shifting left each row, adding more to right? It seems the input pattern is placed along a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Let's think: The pattern ". W . A Y" length 5. In output, we see a diagonal band of width 5 moving from bottom-left to top-right across 15x15. The band contains the pattern as it appears left to right across the diagonal? For each row, the pattern appears starting at some column such that the pattern's relative positions are preserved but shifted left each row (i.e., shear). At row5 (index starting 1), pattern occupies columns 12-15 (W at 12, A at 14, Y at 15). Row6 pattern occupies columns 11-14 (W 11, A13, Y14). Row7 columns 10-13, etc. Row15 (last row) pattern occupies columns 1-5? Let's check last row: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . .". Actually row15: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." So W at col2, A at col4, Y at col5. That's pattern starting at col2. Row14: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . ." W at col3, A col5, Y col6. Row13: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . ." W col4, A col6, Y col7. Row12: ". . . . W . A Y . . . . . . ." W col5, A col7, Y col8. Row11: ". . . . . W . A Y . . . . . ." W col6, A col8, Y col9. Row10: ". . . . . . W . A Y . . . . ." W col7, A col9, Y col10. Row9: ". . . . . . . W . A Y . . . ." W col8, A col10, Y col11. Row8: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . . ." W col9, A col11, Y col12. Row2 earlier had only W at col15 (since pattern truncated). So basically the pattern slides left each row, and when parts go off left edge they disappear, and when off right edge they appear? Actually pattern length 5, grid size 15. Starting row1 (top) pattern is fully off-grid to the right? Row1 all '.' (no pattern). Row2 only W appears at col15 (the second element of pattern). Row3 W at col14, etc. So pattern appears gra ... [8967 chars truncated]
"A chef drags a palette knife loaded with colored sauces diagonally across a dark slate plate, the garnish pattern repeating with each steady pull."
120b: k=2
See: A single line of sauce dots on the edge of a plate — some vibrant, some empty.
Do: The chef draws the knife diagonally across the plate, stamping the sauce pattern one row at a time, each stroke offset by a single position. The plate grows to fit the full decorative sweep.
Grid: The slate plate is black. The sauce dots trace a diagonal band of repeating flavor marks from corner to corner.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of colors (including . as black). Output is a larger grid, seems to be diagonal replication of the input pattern across a square? Let's examine Example1. Input row: ". W . A Y" (5 columns). Output is 15x15? Let's count rows: appears 15 rows, each row length 15. Indeed output is 15x15. Pattern: The input sequence appears along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left? Let's view output rows. Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (all dots) Actually first row shows all dots? Wait row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." yes all dots. Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column) Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at column 13? Actually 14? Let's index 1-15. Row2 has W at col15. Row3 has W at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at col13, A at col15) Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" (W col12, A col14, Y col15) Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." (W col11, A col13, Y col14) Row7: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." (W col10, A col12, Y col13) Row8: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . . ." (W col9, A col11, Y col12) Row9: ". . . . . . . W . A Y . . . ." (W col8, A col10, Y col11) Row10: ". . . . . . W . A Y . . . . ." (W col7, A col9, Y col10) Row11: ". . . . . W . A Y . . . . . ." (W col6, A col8, Y col9) Row12: ". . . . W . A Y . . . . . . ." (W col5, A col7, Y col8) Row13: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . ." (W col4, A col6, Y col7) Row14: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . ." (W col3, A col5, Y col6) Row15: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." (W col2, A col4, Y col5) So pattern: Input row of length 5 placed along a diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Actually the sequence appears shifted each row: W appears moving left each row, A appears two columns right of W, Y appears one column right of A? Let's map positions relative. In input: positions: col1 '.' (ignore), col2 'W', col3 '.', col4 'A', col5 'Y'. In output, we see a diagonal band of width 3 (non-dots) representing the non-dot elements of input, placed such that each row corresponds to a shift. Essentially we are drawing the input row as a diagonal line across a larger square, offset each row by one column to the left (or right). The output size seems to be (input length * 3?) Actually input length 5, output size 15 = 3*5. Example2: Input length 5, output size 5? Wait Example2 output is 5x5. Let's examine. Input: ". . R . ." (5). Output 5x5. Rows: 1: . . . . . 2: . . . . . 3: . . . . R 4: . . . R . 5: . . R . . So pattern: R appears along diagonal from bottom-left to top-right? Row5 col3? Actually row5 has R at col3 (since row5: ". . R . .") That's bottom row, column3. Row4: R at col4. Row3: R at col5. Row2: none. Row1: none. So diagonal from bottom-left upward rightwards, but only for the non-dot elements (R) placed accordingly. Input had R at position 3 (col3). Output shows R's along diagonal where each row shift left? Let's compute: Input length 5, output size 5 (not 15). So why example1 bigger? Maybe because t ... [8704 chars truncated]
"A musical phrase echoes through a vast concert hall, each repetition arriving a beat later than the last, the colored notes cascading diagonally across the silence of the score."
120b: k=1
See: A short motif written in a single measure — some beats carry notes (colored), others are rests (black).
Do: The motif repeats on successive staves, each entry delayed by one beat, creating a cascading canon that stretches the score to fit every echo.
Grid: The silence is black. The notes form a diagonal cascade of the original motif, each repetition one beat further along.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of colors (including black '.' as silence). Output is larger grid where motif repeats diagonally down-right, each repetition shifted one column to right and one row down? Let's examine example. Input row: ". W . A Y" (5 columns). Output is 15x15? Actually output shown as 15 rows each with 15 columns. Let's see pattern: The original motif seems to be the non-black cells in order: W, A, Y (positions 2,4,5). Output shows diagonal cascade: first row all '.'? Actually first row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (all black). Second row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at far right column). Third row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W one left from rightmost). Fourth row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W then A). Fifth row: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" (W A Y). Then continues shifting leftwards and downwards. It seems they are creating a diagonal where each repetition of motif is placed starting at a different column offset, moving leftwards each row, forming a diagonal from top right to bottom left? Let's map coordinates. Let's index rows 0-14, cols 0-14. Row 0 all '.'. Row 1: W at col 14. Row 2: W at col 13. Row 3: W at col 12, A at col 14? Wait row3 shows "... W . A". Actually row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". So W at col 12, A at col 14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" => W at col 11, A at col 13, Y at col 14. Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." => W col10, A col12, Y col13. Row6: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." => W col9, A col11, Y col12. Row7: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . . ." => W col8, A col10, Y col11. Row8: ". . . . . . . W . A Y . . . ." => W col7, A col9, Y col10. Row9: ". . . . . . W . A Y . . . . ." => W col6, A col8, Y col9. Row10: ". . . . . W . A Y . . . . . ." => W col5, A col7, Y col8. Row11: ". . . . W . A Y . . . . . . ." => W col4, A col6, Y col7. Row12: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . ." => W col3, A col5, Y col6. Row13: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . ." => W col2, A col4, Y col5. Row14: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." => W col1, A col3, Y col2? Wait row14 shows ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". That's W at col1, A at col3, Y at col4? Actually there is a dot after Y? Let's count: row14: positions: 0 '.';1 'W';2 '.';3 'A';4 'Y'; rest '.'. So Y at col4. So pattern: each row shifts motif left by one column, and also moves down one row, until motif reaches left side. The output grid size is (input length * 3?) Actually input length 5, output size 15 (3*5). Why 3? Because number of non-black cells? Input has 3 colored cells (W A Y). Output size equals number of colored cells * input length? Let's compute: 3 colored cells, each row shift left until leftmost colored cell reaches column 0? In final row, W at col1, not 0. Because there is preceding '.' maybe due to original black at start? The motif includes a leading '.' (black) before W. The original input row: . W . A Y (positions 0 '.' 1 W 2 '.' 3 A 4 Y). So motif length ... [9686 chars truncated]
"A relay team passes a baton across lanes on a dark track, each runner slightly ahead and to the right of the one before, their jersey colors tracing a diagonal across the field."
120b: k=3
See: A lineup of athletes in a single lane — some wearing colored jerseys, some absent.
Do: Each successive runner appears one lane over and one position forward, carrying the same pattern of jerseys diagonally across an expanding track until the formation spans the full stadium.
Grid: The dark track is black. The jersey colors form a diagonal stripe of repeating team formations from one corner to the opposite.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of length N (5). Output is a square grid of size? In examples, input length 5 yields output 15x15? Let's see Example1 input row: ". W . A Y" length5. Output is 15 rows each 15 columns. Pattern: diagonal stripe of the input pattern repeated along diagonal from top-right? Let's examine output: Row0: all dots? Actually first row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 dots). Row1: same but last element W at column13? Wait row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W". So W appears at far right column (index14). Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." W at col13. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" W at col12, A at col14? Actually row3 shows "... W . A". So pattern shifts leftwards each row, adding next element of input to the right side? Let's map. Input pattern: positions: 0 '.' (black),1 'W',2 '.',3 'A',4 'Y'. Output seems to create diagonal of the pattern moving down-left, filling a triangle? Actually final row (row14) is ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". That's the original pattern at leftmost side. So the pattern slides from rightmost top to leftmost bottom, creating a diagonal band of width equal to input length? Let's view rows: row i (0-index) has pattern placed starting at column (N-1 - i) maybe? For i from 0 to N-1? But output size is 2N-1 =9? Wait N=5, output size 15 = 3N? Actually 15 = 3*5. Let's examine: rows 0-14 (15 rows). The pattern appears from row N-1 (4) onward? Let's check row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y". That's row index4, pattern starts at col10? Actually columns 0-14. Row4 has W at col10, A at col12, Y at col14? Wait there are spaces between. Let's compute: pattern length 5 includes dots. The pattern placed with its first element at column (something). Row4 shows "... W . A Y". So there are spaces between W and A etc. Means pattern placed with original spacing (including dots) but shifted left. Thus rule: take input row of length N. Create output grid of size (2N-1)?? But we have 15 for N=5 => 3N? Let's check Example2: input length5, output size? Provided output 5 rows each 5 columns. Wait Example2 output is 5x5, not 15x15. Let's examine Example2 input ". . R . .". Output: Row0: ". . . . ." Row1: ". . . . ." Row2: ". . . . R" Row3: ". . . R ." Row4: ". . R . ." That's 5x5. So size = N? Actually N=5, output 5x5. Example1 output 15x15, not 5x5. Something else: maybe output size = (2*#non-dots?)? Let's count non-dots in input1: W, A, Y =3. 2*3+? Not 15. Maybe output size = (N + (N-1)*2) = 3N-? For N=5 => 13? Not 15. Let's examine Example3: input length5, output size 15x15 as well. Input pattern Y . M . A (non-dots Y,M,A). Output 15 rows. So why Example2 output only 5? Let's look at pattern: input has only one non-dot (R) in middle. Output shows diagonal of R moving down-left from bottom-right? Actually output rows 0-1 all dots, rows 2-4 have R shifting left each row. That's like a diagonal of length 3? Wait rows 2,3,4 have R at columns 4,3,2 respectively. So pattern length 5 bu ... [11429 chars truncated]
"A band of colored rain sweeps diagonally across a dark radar screen, the same cluster of precipitation cells repeating at each scan line, shifted by the prevailing wind."
120b: k=2
See: A single radar scan line with a few colored cells indicating precipitation amid darkness.
Do: The wind pushes the rain band one pixel sideways with each new scan line, painting a diagonal swath across the expanding radar display.
Grid: The radar background is black. The colored precipitation cells form a diagonal band repeated at every row, shifted steadily by the wind.
We need to infer rule. Example1: Input is a single row of length5: ". W . A Y". Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see output lines count: appears 15 rows, each row length 15. The pattern: diagonal band of the input sequence repeated shifted each row down-right? Let's examine: Input sequence positions: col0 '.', col1 'W', col2 '.', col3 'A', col4 'Y'. Output first row: all '.' (15). second row: '.' ... 'W' at column? row2 (index1) has W at column13? Wait need to map. Let's index columns 0-14. Row0 all '.'. Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" Actually row1 shows many '.' then W at last column? The printed row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W". That's 16 entries? Let's count: they show 15? Let's count: there are 15 '.' then W? That would be 16 columns. Let's recount: maybe they have 15 columns total, with W at column13? Let's compute pattern: The diagonal seems moving leftwards? Let's look at later rows: Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." So W shifted left one column, and '.' after. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". So W at col12, A at col14? Actually pattern: each row adds next element of input sequence after shifting. It seems they are creating a diagonal of the input row repeated across a square of size (len*3?) Wait length 5 input leads to 15 output size (3*len). Possibly they are expanding each cell into a diagonal line of length equal to input length? Let's examine pattern more concretely. Take input sequence: positions with colors: index1=W, index3=A, index4=Y. Output shows diagonal band where these colors appear along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left? Row1 has W at far right. Row2 has W one left, and '.' after. Row3 has W further left, and A appears two right of W? Actually row3: "... W . A". So W at col? Let's map columns 0-14. Row3 string: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". That's 13 '.' then W then '.' then A then maybe rest '.'? Count: there are 12 '.'? Let's count: indices: 0-11 '.' (12), index12=W, index13='.', index14='A'. So A at col14 (rightmost). Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y". That's 11 '.' then W at col11, '.' at col12, A at13, Y at14. So pattern: each row adds next element of input to the rightmost side, while shifting previous elements left. Thus they are creating a diagonal where the input row is placed along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left, preserving order left-to-right of input as you go down rows? Let's see: Row4 has W A Y at columns 11,13,14 (with a dot between W and A). Actually there is a dot between W and A because input had '.' at index2. So the pattern replicates the input row as a sliding window across rows, moving left each row. Essentially output is a square of size (len*3?) Wait number of rows = 15 = 3*5. Why 3? Maybe they are expanding each input cell into a diagonal of length equal to input length? Let's think: The rule might be: take input row, and produce a square where each successive row shifts the input row one column left, and repeats until the input row has moved com ... [8361 chars truncated]
"Colored tiles are laid in a staircase pattern across a dark floor, the same mosaic fragment repeated on each step, climbing diagonally from one corner of the room to the other."
120b: k=2
See: A small mosaic fragment in a single row — some tiles are colored, others match the dark floor.
Do: The mason repeats the fragment on ascending steps, each one offset by a single tile width, expanding the floor to accommodate the full diagonal stairway of pattern.
Grid: The floor is black. The colored tiles trace a diagonal band of the repeated mosaic fragment climbing from bottom-left toward the top-right.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row of length N (example1 length5, example2 length5). Output is a square grid of size? Example1 output appears 15x15? Let's count rows: they show 15 rows, each row length 15. Input length 5. Output size = 3*input length? 5*3 =15. Example2 output size? They show 5 rows of length5. Wait example2 output is 5x5, not 15. Input length5, output size5. Hmm maybe output size = input length? But example1 output is 15x15, not 5. Let's examine pattern: Example1 input row: ". W . A Y". So colored tiles: W at position2, A at position4, Y at position5 (1-index). Output shows diagonal band of repeated fragment offset each step. Looks like they tiled the fragment along diagonal, creating a larger square where each step shifts right by 1 and down by 1, replicating the fragment. The size becomes (input length) * (input length)?? Actually they repeated fragment N times along diagonal, each offset by one column, resulting in a square of size N + (N-1) = 2N-1? Let's test: N=5, 2N-1=9, but output is 15. So not. Maybe they repeat fragment N times both horizontally and vertically, creating N*N grid where each row is the fragment shifted? For N=5, that would be 5x5, not 15. But output 15 suggests they repeated fragment 3 times? Maybe they repeat until the diagonal reaches top right corner of a square where each step offset by one tile width, and the fragment length is 5, so diagonal length = 5 + (5-1) =9? Not 15. Let's examine output pattern more concretely. Write rows with indices. Row1: all dots (15). Row2: dot ... W at column14? Actually row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W". So W at column15? Wait count: there are 15 entries. Row2 has W at last column (15). Row3: W at column14, dot after? Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W .". So W at col14. Row4: W at col13, A at col15? Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". So W col13, A col15. Row5: W col12, A col14, Y col15. Row6: W col11, A col13, Y col14, dot? Actually row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y .". So W col11, A col13, Y col14. Row7: W col10, A col12, Y col13, dot? Row7: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . .". So pattern shifting leftwards each row. Essentially they are drawing the fragment as a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right across a larger square. The fragment appears repeated along that diagonal? Actually each row contains a segment of the fragment placed such that the fragment's first colored tile appears at a certain column, and subsequent colored tiles follow to the right, but the fragment is placed such that its leftmost tile aligns with the diagonal offset. Observing row15 (last row): ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . .". That's the original fragment at leftmost side. Row14: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . .". Row13: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . .". So the fragment moves leftwards each row upward. Thus output size = input length + (input length -1) * (input length?) Wait number of rows = 15 = 3*5. Why 3? Because maybe they repeat fragment three times along diagonal? L ... [11575 chars truncated]
"Signal flares arc across the night battlefield, each volley launched one trench further down the line, the same color-coded message repeated in a diagonal barrage across the darkness."
120b: k=1
See: A single trench with a few colored flares loaded and some empty positions.
Do: Each successive trench fires the same flare pattern, but one position offset along the front line, creating a diagonal curtain of signal lights across an expanding battlefield.
Grid: The night sky is black. The colored flares form a diagonal curtain of the repeating signal pattern from one edge to the other.
We need to infer rule from example. Input is a single row: ". W . A Y" (5 columns). Output is a 15x15 grid? Let's see output lines count: appears 15 rows, each row 15 columns. Pattern: diagonal curtain of repeating pattern "W A Y" maybe? Let's examine output: first row all dots. second row has W at column 14? Actually row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column). Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at column 13). Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at col12, A at col14). Row5: ". . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" (W col11, A col13, Y col15). Row6: ". . . . . . . . . . W . A Y ." (W col10, A col12, Y col14). Row7: ". . . . . . . . . W . A Y . ." (W col9, A col11, Y col13). Row8: ". . . . . . . . W . A Y . . ." (W col8, A col10, Y col12). Row9: ". . . . . . . W . A Y . . . ." (W col7, A col9, Y col11). Row10: ". . . . . . W . A Y . . . . ." (W col6, A col8, Y col10). Row11: ". . . . . W . A Y . . . . . ." (W col5, A col7, Y col9). Row12: ". . . . W . A Y . . . . . . ." (W col4, A col6, Y col8). Row13: ". . . W . A Y . . . . . . . ." (W col3, A col5, Y col7). Row14: ". . W . A Y . . . . . . . . ." (W col2, A col4, Y col6). Row15: ". W . A Y . . . . . . . . . ." (W col1, A col3, Y col5). So pattern: original input row ". W . A Y" (positions: col2 W, col4 A, col5 Y). Output is a diagonal repetition of that pattern moving leftwards each row, forming a diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right? Actually bottom row (row15) matches original pattern placed starting at column1: ". W . A Y" then rest dots. Row14 shifts right by 1? Row14 has W at col2, A at col4, Y at col6 (shifted right 1). Row13 shift right 2, etc. Up to row2 where only W appears at column14 (since pattern truncated). Row1 all dots. Thus rule: take input row (single trench) and produce a square output of size N where N = length of input *? Here input length 5, output size 15 (3*5?). Actually pattern repeats three colored elements (W A Y) across length? The output size seems to be (input length) * (number of colored elements?) Not exactly. Let's compute: Input length =5. Output size = 3*5 =15. Because there are 3 colored flares (non-dot) in input. So maybe output dimension = number of colored elements * input length? Let's test: colored count =3, input length=5 => 15. That matches. The pattern: we repeat the colored sequence (preserving order) diagonally across square. Essentially we tile the colored elements along a diagonal, each step moving one column left (or right) per row, forming a diagonal of the pattern repeated. General rule: For each colored element in input (in order left to right), we create a diagonal line of that element across the output grid, offset such that the first occurrence of each element appears at its original column in the bottom row, and then each subsequent row moves the element one column to the left, until it disappears at left edge. The output grid size is (num_colored * input_length) rows and columns. But need to verify with othe ... [8274 chars truncated]
"Spotlights sweep diagonally across a dark stage, each beam picking up the same arrangement of costumed performers but finding them one step further in their choreographed march across the boards."
120b: k=2
See: A row of performers at stage edge — some in colored costumes, some positions empty.
Do: Row by row upstage, the same cast arrangement reappears, each time shifted one mark to the side, the stage expanding to let the procession trace a full diagonal crossing.
Grid: The dark stage is black. The colored costumes form a diagonal procession of the same ensemble repeated at each successive row.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row? In examples, input is a row of 5 cells. Output is a larger grid (15x15 in example1, 5x5 in example2). Looks like they create a diagonal repetition of the input row across rows, shifting right each row, forming a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left? Let's examine example2. Input: . . R . . (positions 0-4). Output 5x5 grid: Row0: . . . . . Row1: . . . . . Row2: . . . . R Row3: . . . R . Row4: . . R . . So pattern: The original row appears on each row, shifted left? Actually row2 has R at column4 (rightmost). Row3 has R at column3. Row4 has R at column2. So it's moving left each subsequent row downwards, starting from row index = (input length -1) -? Let's see: Input length 5, non-empty at col2 (0-index). In output, the R appears on diagonal from bottom-left? Actually positions: (row2,col4), (row3,col3), (row4,col2). That's a diagonal descending leftwards. The top rows are empty. So rule: Place the input row as a diagonal from bottom-right to top-left? Wait example1 more complex. Example1 input: . W . A Y (positions: col1=W, col3=A, col4=Y). Output is 15x15. Let's see pattern: The output seems to have the sequence W A Y appearing diagonally down-left across rows, with preceding '.' filler. Let's examine some rows: Row0: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (all dots) Actually first row in output: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (15 dots). Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at col14). Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at col13). Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at col12, A at col14?). Wait need to count. Let's index columns 0-14. Row1: W at col14. Row2: W at col13. Row3: W at col12, A at col14. Row4: W at col11, A at col13, Y at col14. Row5: W at col10, A at col12, Y at col13. Row6: W at col9, A at col11, Y at col12. Row7: W at col8, A at col10, Y at col11. Row8: W at col7, A at col9, Y at col10. Row9: W at col6, A at col8, Y at col9. Row10: W at col5, A at col7, Y at col8. Row11: W at col4, A at col6, Y at col7. Row12: W at col3, A at col5, Y at col6. Row13: W at col2, A at col4, Y at col5. Row14: W at col1, A at col3, Y at col4. So pattern: The input row of length 5 is placed repeatedly along a diagonal from top-right to bottom-left, each row shifting left by one, and the elements appear in same relative order but spaced? Actually the relative positions maintain same spacing as in input: original input had . W . A Y (positions 0 '.' 1 W 2 '.' 3 A 4 Y). The pattern shows that in each row, the three colored cells appear with same gaps between them: W then one dot then A then Y (adjacent?). In input, there is a dot between W and A (col2). In output rows, between W and A there is one dot (col? e.g., row4: W at col11, A at col13 => one dot at col12). Between A and Y there is no dot? In input, A at col3, Y at col4 (adjacent). In output rows, A and Y are adjacent (col13 and col14). So they preserve relative offsets. Thus rule: Take the input row, treat it as a pattern of colore ... [11681 chars truncated]
"A gardener plants the same sequence of colored bulbs in diagonal furrows across a dark plot, each row offset by one space, so that come spring the blooms trace a ribbon across the bed."
120b: k=2
See: A single furrow with a few colored bulbs planted among empty dark spaces.
Do: The gardener digs parallel furrows, planting the same bulb pattern in each but shifted one position sideways, expanding the bed until the diagonal ribbon of blooms is complete.
Grid: The soil is black. The colored blooms trace a diagonal ribbon of the repeated planting pattern across the expanded bed.
We need to infer rule. Input is a single row? Example1 input: ". W . A Y" that's 5 columns. Output is 15x15? Actually output shown is 15 rows each 15 columns. Looks like they expanded to square where diagonal contains repeated pattern shifted each row. Pattern: Input row: . W . A Y (positions 0-4). Output: a 15x15 grid where along diagonal from top-right? Let's examine output rows. Row0: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (all dots) length 15. Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" (W at last column index14) Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." (W at col13) Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" (W at12, A at14?) Wait row3 shows "... W . A". Let's index: row3 length 15. At col? Let's write positions 0-14. Row3: columns: 0-? all dots until maybe col11? Let's count: there are 12 dots then W then dot then A? Actually string: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". That's 13 dots? Let's count: there are 13 entries before W? Let's count: entries: 0 '.';1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 '.';11 '.';12 '.';13 'W';14 '.';15 'A'? Wait length 15 only, can't have 16. Something off. Let's count properly: Provided row: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A". That's 15 entries? Let's count: 1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 '.';11 '.';12 '.';13 '.';14 'W';15 '.';16 'A' => 16 entries. But grid should be 15x15 maybe 16? Let's check other rows. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" count? That's 15? Let's count: 1 '.';2 '.';3 '.';4 '.';5 '.';6 '.';7 '.';8 '.';9 '.';10 '.';11 '.';12 '.';13 'W';14 '.';15 'A';16 'Y' => 16 again. So maybe grid is 16x16? Let's see number of rows: they listed rows 0-14? Actually they listed 15 rows (starting with row0). Let's count rows: they gave rows from first line ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." (row0) then row1 with W at end, row2, row3, row4, row5, row6, row7, row8, row9, row10, row11, row12, row13, row14. That's 15 rows. So grid is 15 rows, but each row appears to have 16 columns? Let's verify row0: they show 15 dots? ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . ." that's 15 entries. So row0 length 15. Row1: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W" that's 15 entries (14 dots + W). Row2: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . W ." that's 15 entries? Let's count: 13 dots? Actually pattern: 13 dots, W, dot = 15. So row2 has W at column13, dot at 14. Row3: ". . . . . . . . . . . . . W . A" that's 15 entries: 12 dots, W, dot, A = 15. So W at col12, A at col14. Row4: ". . . . . . . . . . . . W . A Y" that's 15 entries: 11 dots, W, dot, A, Y = 15. So pattern: each row adds next element of input pattern shifted leftwards. Thus grid size = (input length)*(input length?) Input length =5. Output size = 5*3? Actually 15 rows = 3*5. So maybe output size = input length * (input length -? )? Let's see: 5 -> 15 = 3*5. Why 3? Maybe number of non-dot elements in input? Input has 3 colored bulbs: W, A, Y (since '.' are black). So number of colored =3. Output rows = input length * number of colored? 5*3=15. Columns = same 15. S ... [9277 chars truncated]